alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.
-------------------------------------------------
Robert B. Nolen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2006
-------------------------------------------------
(Date)

      A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1806

JOHN S. STRITZINGER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JOHN STRATTON, Verizon Business; CHRISTIANA CARE; JAMES 

CLAPPER, NSC; DIANA GOWEN, Centurylink; SUSAN ZELENIAK, 

Verizon Gov; JOHN SPEARS, ATT; LOCKHEED MARTIN, PC; NORTHROP 

GRUMMAN; JACK GALLANT, U of California Berkeley; TERENCE 

MCAULIFFE, Governor Commonwealth of Virginia; SENTARA 

HEALTHCARE; JOSEPH BIDEN, Vice President of the United 

States; WILMERHALE, Brian Boyton, Verizon Outside Counsel; 

JAMES R. STRITZINGER, SR.; JACK MARKELL, Governor of 

Delaware; LEWIS; DAVID A. STRITZINGER; PA STATE POLICE; 

WILLIAM R. STRITZINGER; MD TRANSIT AUTHORITY; VA STATE 

POLICE; LOUIS FREEH; JAMES R. STRITZINGER, JR.; TX STATE 

POLICE; VERNON H. C. WRIGHT; FL STATE POLICE; FEDERAL BUREAU 

OF INVESTIGATIONS; MD STATE POLICE; DE STATE POLICE; MR. 

MILCH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Paige Jones Gossett, Magistrate

Judge. (3:15-cv-03211-TLW-PJG)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

John S. Stritzinger seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s 

order denying his motion to reopen his case. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 

28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The 

order Stritzinger seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor 

an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(b) (2012). Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, deny Stritzinger’s pending motions, and dismiss the 

appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Phœnixville Borough, Appellant, *v.*Brownback.

February 25, 1907:

Opinion bv

Henderson, J.,

It was agreed by counsel that the decision in this case should follow that of the Burgess and Town Council of the Borough of Phoenixville, against John B. Miller, ante, *10p. 6, in which an opinion has been this day filed reversing the judgment .and entering judgment in favor of the plaintiff on the verdict. The judgment in this case is therefore reversed and judgment is now entered in favor of the plaintiff on the verdict.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

.



# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

AUBREY BEASLEY,

Petitioner

v.

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent

______________________

2023

- 2352

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection

Board in No. CH

- 0752

- 17

- 0273

- I

- 1.

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the court’s December 19, 2023

order and Aubrey Beasley’s Federal Circuit Form 10, ECF

No. 20,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

This case and all transmittals are transferred to the

United States District Court for the Northern District of Case: 23-2352 Document: 21 Page: 1 Filed: 02/26/2024BEASLEY v. DVA 2

Illinois pursuant to the court’s December 19, 2023 order

and 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

February 26 , 2024

Date F OR THE C OURT Case: 23-2352 Document: 21 Page: 2 Filed: 02/26/2024
#### Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Lectro-Media, Ltd.

*Robert*P. *Lipkin,*for plaintiff.

*James W. Adelman,*for defendant.

October 20, 1977

BULLOCK, *J.,*

Plaintiff, a corporation of undisclosed origin, has sued defendant, a Pennsylvania resident, claiming moneys due and payable. Defendant has filed preliminary objections on the grounds that plaintiff is a foreign corporation which does not have a certificate of authority to conduct business in Pennsylvania. Despite the fact that the preliminary objections aver facts, there is no affidavit attached in accordance with Pa. R.C.P. 1024.

Determination whether plaintiff is presently eligible to sue in Pennsylvania requires determination whether (a) plaintiff has been doing business in Pennsylvania, (b) whether plaintiff is engaged in interstate commerce and, (c) whether the *256specific transaction which is the subject of this suit itself may be characterized as doing business in Pennsylvania, interstate commerce, or both. Once the factual situation has been determined, there remains a legal question as to the proper interpretation of the Act of May 5, 1933, P.L. 364, secs. 1001 and 1014, as amended, 15 P. S. §§2001 and 2014.

Although the complaint herein states no jurisdictional facts, the exhibits to the complaint already suggest the possibility of interstate commerce. Under the circumstances, we believe the most appropriate method of resolving the issue raised by the preliminary objections would be the taking of depositions by plaintiff to establish the factual basis upon which his right to sue exists. Defendant should, of course, be permitted to take counter-depositions. Consequently, we enter the following

ORDER

And now, October 20, 1977, plaintiff is directed to take depositions within 30 days hereof for the purpose of establishing the factual basis upon which it maintains the right to sue. Defendant shall have the right to take counter-depositions within 20 days from the date of plaintiff’s depositions. The time for the taking of depositions may be extended by written agreement of counsel. Upon transcription of depositions, which shall be no more than ten days after taking, said depositions or counter-depositions shall be immediately filed with this court. An argument on this matter shall be held on December 9, 1977, at 9:00 a.m. in room 604 City Hall, Philadelphia, Pa.
2013.03.29 Ex-10.9






Exhibit 10.9




AMENDMENT THREE
TO THE
COCA-COLA REFRESHMENTS SEVERANCE PAY PLAN
FOR EXEMPT EMPLOYEES


WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company established the Coca-Cola Refreshments Severance Pay Plan for Exempt Employees (“Plan”); and
WHEREAS, The Coca-Cola Company Benefits Committee (“Benefits Committee”) is authorized to amend the Plan at any time; 
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Plan is amended as follows, effective as stated below:
		
	1.
	Effective January 1, 2013, subparagraph (b) in the definition of Participant is amended to read as follows:




“(b)    a regular full-time or regular part-time Exempt Employee of The Coca-Cola Company or an Affiliate who is performing services for the North America Group and who ultimately reports up to the President of Coca-Cola Americas in accordance with the personnel and organizational systems of the Company and/or The Coca-Cola Company and who is actively at work or on an Approved Leave of Absence, excluding, however, any such employee whose compensation structure is based on job grade in accordance with the personnel and organizational systems of the Company and/or The Coca-Cola Company, or”
		
	2.
	Effective February 1, 2013, the following entities are added to Appendix A (Participating Affiliates):




“Southwest Canners, Inc.
Southwest Canners of Texas, Inc.
Sacramento Coca-Cola Bottling Company”
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Benefits Committee has caused this Amendment to be signed by its duly authorized member as of this  19th day of March 2013.




THE COCA-COLA COMPANY
BENEFITS COMMITTEE


/s/ Sue Fleming ______________            
Sue Fleming
Benefits Committee Chairperson
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1
                                  SUBSIDIARIES


NAME                                                   JURISDICTION OF FORMATION
----                                                   -------------------------

NCO Funding, Inc.                                      Delaware
Financial Collection Agencies (International), Inc.    Canada
FCA Funding, Inc.                                      Delaware
NCO Portfolio Management, Inc. *                       Delaware
Compass International Services Corporation             Delaware
Financial Collection Agencies, Limited                 United Kingdom
Financial Collection Agencies, Inc.                    Puerto Rico
JDR Holdings, Inc.                                     Delaware
NCO Financial Systems, Inc.                            Pennsylvania
NCO Holdings, Inc.                                     Delaware
MCA Holdings, Inc.                                     Delaware
International Account Systems, Inc.                    Florida

* Owns 21 subsidiaries operating in the United States engaged in the ownership
  of delinquent receivables.

Note: This table does not include any subsidiary that is not required to be
      listed pursuant to Item 601(b)(21) of Regulation S-K.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JERRY EUGENE SHRUBB,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 283 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
1 In The 

### Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________ N O . 09
- 20
- 00253
- CR

__________________ COD E Y PAUL BARNES , Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 9th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 19
- 06
- 07983
- CR

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Cod e y Paul Barnes 1 appealed from a sentence , which the court pronounced

on September 18, 2020. The notice of appeal that Barnes filed in the trial court showed he file d the appeal on November 5, 2020, a date more than thirty days from the date the trial court sentenced him, which is beyond the time in which he could have request ed an extension in which he could have filed a timely appeal

. And the

1 Barnes’ first name is spelled “Cody” on the notice of appeal.2 record does not demonst rate that Barnes qualifies for the extended deadlines since it fails to show he moved for a new trial.
On November 9, 2020, we notified the parties that Barnes’ notice of appeal did not appear to have been timely filed. Barnes did not respond to the notice

. We find Barnes did not file a timely notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. He also did not file a timely request to extend the appellate deadlines pursuant to Rule 26.3.
Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. It also does not appear that Barnes obtain ed permission from the Court of Criminal Appeals to file an out

- of

- time appeal.
We find the Court is without jurisdiction to entertain Barnes’ appeal. For that reason, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM

Submitted on D ecember 29, 2020 Opinion Delivered D ecember 30, 2020 Do Not Publish Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Attachment N

Work Sheets used to Calculate EPA and Federal Government Labor

Costs

NAICS: 999100

EPA or Federal Government

Labor Category: Formula Managerial Technical Clerical

Unloaded Hourly Rate1 = W $55.67 $36.02 $20.38 

Benefits Percentage2 Lb = B/W 44% 44% 44%

Benefits per hour B = W*Lb $24.54 $15.88 $8.98 

Loaded Hourly Rate Wb = W + B = 

W(1+Lb)

$80.21 $51.90 $29.36 

Overhead Percentage3 Lo = OH/Wb 50% 50% 50%

Overhead per hour OH = Wb*Lo $40.11 $25.95 $14.68 

Fully Loaded Hourly 

Rate

Wf = Wb + OH

= W + B + OH 

$120.32 $77.85 $44.05 

1. Data Source: BLS (http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics4_999100.htm ); May 2011 data

 NAICS 999100 - Federal Executive Branch 

 Standard Occupational Codes:

 Management: 11-0000, Management Occupations

 Technical: 19-0000, Life, Physical, and Social Science Occupations

 Clerical: 43-0000, Office and Administrative Support Occupations

2. Fringe benefits/wage per hour. The average for non farm, non federal civilian workers.

3. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Air Pollution Control Cost Manual, Sixth Edition, 

EPA-452-02-001, January 2002, pg. 2-34. The loading for indirect costs is within the range of 20-

70% of the load labor rate (wage + benefits) suggested in EPA guidance.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07544]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Using Longitudinal Data to 
Characterize the Natural History of Fragile X Syndrome to Improve 
Services and Outcomes, DD15-003, initial review.
SUMMARY: This document corrects a notice that was published in the 
Federal Register on March 25, 2015 Volume 80, Number 57, page 15798. 
The time and date should read as follows:
    Time and Date: 11:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., April 15, 2015 (Closed).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: M. Chris Langub, Ph.D., Scientific 
Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop F46, Atlanta, 
Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3585, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d0808027b0d2e292e632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90d5d5dfa6d0f3f4f3bef7ffe6">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-07544 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2016327EN.01000101.xml

| 6.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 September 2016

(2016/C 327/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1156 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,24 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4407 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83643 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5478 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0925 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2458 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,33 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3541 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4495 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2872 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4696 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4436 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6517 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5252 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5135 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 234,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0116 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4496 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5010 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 658,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5472 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,907 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,4024 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,711 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6258 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6487 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,1400 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1156

JPY

Japanese yen

115,24

DKK

Danish krone

7,4407

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83643

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5478

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0925

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2458

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,33

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3541

RON

Romanian leu

4,4495

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2872

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4696

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4436

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6517

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5252

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5135

KRW

South Korean won

1 234,36

ZAR

South African rand

16,0116

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4496

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5010

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 658,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5472

PHP

Philippine peso

51,907

RUB

Russian rouble

72,4024

THB

Thai baht

38,711

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6258

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6487

INR

Indian rupee

74,1400

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 30, 2016

t1121 

# Order

Clerk November 30, 2016

152526 (22)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152526

COA: 328106

Wayne CC: 88

- 011919

- FC

CHARLES EDWARD GOODMAN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September

27, 2016 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.
IN I T I A L REV I EW ENG I N EER I NG REPORT PMN : 1 5 - 0689 0690 Focu s Ready Draft 8/3 1 /2015 ENG I N EER : Au s t in \ JAS 

# ....IN I T I A L REV I EW ENG I N EER I NG REPORT PMN : 1 5 - 0689 0690 

# -·

ENV I RONMENTAL R EL EAS E S EST I MAT E SUMMARY 

# -

IRER Note : The da i ly re l eases listed for any source be l ow may coinc i de wi th da i l y re l ease s from t he o t her sources to the same med i um .Wate r Hi gh End :

Wate r Low End of Range : 1 . 8E + O k g/ s i t e - day ove r 1 5 day s /yr fr om 

# 111111 or 2 . 7E + 1 k g/ s i t e - y r f rom 

## 111111 o r 2 . 7 E + 1 kg/yr 4111111111 Hi gh End of Ra n ge : 9 . 0E + O**day** over 1 5**day ~**  

# 111111 r - al l s i t e s

Wate r Outp ut 2 : 2 . 2E - 4 kg/s i te - day over 1 5 days/yr from or 3 . 3E - 3 k g/si t e - y r f rom o r 3 . 3 E- 3 kg/yrRE LEASE TOTAL 8 . 3E+3 kg/yr - a ll sites OCCU PATI ONAL EXPOSURE S EST I MATE SUMMARY

# -
Exhibit
32.1(1)

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Joshua Pickus, the chief executive officer of Support.com, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63
of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



|(i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ JOSHUA
PICKUS                    
|                  |  |  |  | Joshua Pickus                        
|                  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to Support.com, Inc. and will be retained by
Support.com, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





|(1) | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that
the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MEMORANDUM

TO: Portland Cement NESHAP Docket

FROM: Keith Barnett, USEPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

DATE: June 2, 2008

SUBJECT: Meeting on Portland Cement NESHAP

On August 28 and September 4, 2009 teleconferences were held between representatives 

of the USEPA and several cement companies. The purpose of the call was to discuss the 

THC testing program. Underlined attendees attended both meetings.

Attendees for September 4, 2009 Conference on THC Test Plan

John Holmes AEMS

Curtis Lesslie Ash Grove Cement Co.

Dan Nugent Buzzi Unicem USA Inc.

Rich Alonso Bracewell & Giulliani

Desirea Haggard CalPortland

Satish Sheth CEMEX

Lillian DePrimo CEMEX

Peter Tsirigotis EPA

Steve Fruh EPA

Keith Barnett EPA

Doug Roark GCC of America, Inc.

Hector Ybanez Holcim (US) Inc.

Jason Morin Holcim (US) Inc.

Michael Pelan Lafarge North America Inc.

Tim Matz Lehigh Cement Co.

David Novello Law Offices of David Novello LLC

Andy O’Hare Portland Cement Association

Jay Willis Titan AmericaLLC

Nancy Garnett TXI