alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE> 14

FiNet.com TO ANNOUNCE RESULTS FOR PERIOD ENDING OCTOBER 31, 1999 -
Company announces change to fiscal calendar year effective January
1, 2000

WALNUT CREEK, CA, November 9, 1999 - FiNet.com Inc. (NASDAQ: FNCM)
owner and operator of www.FiNet.com, "America's Home Finance
Network," today announced that on December 7, 1999 it will release
results from the period ending October 31, 1999. The company will
issue a press release and hold a conference call for investors on
Tuesday, December 7, 1999, at 4:30 p.m. Eastern time.

The conference call can be accessed by calling 888-316-9406 from
the continental U.S., and 415-228-4729 internationally. A replay
of the call will be available through December 10, 1999 by calling
800-627-9894 from the continental U.S., and 402-220-0238
internationally. The call will also be simulcast over the Internet
on the Vcall web site at http://www.vcall.com. Listeners should go
to the web site before the call and download the necessary audio
software.

FiNet.com Chairman and CEO, Mark Korell is the host of the
conference call. The passcode to participate is FiNet.

FiNet.com also announced that it will change its financial
reporting period from a fiscal year to a calendar year, with
quarterly reporting on calendar quarters.  FiNet.com's most recent
fiscal year ended April 30, 1999.  There will be a transition
period consisting of the eight-month period ending December 31,
1999, and the company expects to report its results for the final
three months of 1999. The new reporting year will begin January 1,
2000, with the first quarter of the 2000 reporting year ending
March 31, 2000.

About FiNet.com
FiNet.com, Inc., "America's Home Finance Network" including its
wholly owned subsidiaries (the "Company"), is a leading provider
of e-commerce home financing services that facilitates home
ownership through a variety of technology-based products and
automated, multi-lender services for consumers and mortgage broker
businesses. The Company offers automated financing solutions
directly to consumers through its www.interloan.com on-line home
financing web site and to mortgage broker businesses through
Monument Mortgage.

Safe Harbor
Certain statements in this press release, including statements
regarding the anticipated development and expansion of the
Company's business, and the intent, belief or current expectations
of the Company, its directors or its officers, are
"forwardlooking" statements (as such term is defined in the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Because such
statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, actual results
may differ materially from those expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements.
# C_2016092EN.01000101.xml

| 9.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7922 — Nordic Capital/Greendeli Investment Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 92/01)

On 2 March 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7922. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7922. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18234-18235]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07708]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Federal Open Market Committee; Domestic Policy Directive of 
January 27-28, 2015

    In accordance with Section 271.3 of its rules regarding 
availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below 
the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market 
Committee at its meeting held on January 27-28, 2015.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee 
at its meeting held on January 27-28, 2015, which includes the 
domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon 
request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 
Washington, DC 20551. The minutes are published in the Federal 
Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's Annual Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Federal Open Market 
Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster 
maximum employment and price stability. In particular, the Committee 
seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds

[[Page 18235]]

trading in a range from 0 to \1/4\ percent. The Committee directs the 
Desk to undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain such 
conditions. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its policy of 
rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and its 
policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency 
mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. The 
Committee also directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll and coupon 
swap transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal 
Reserve's agency mortgage-backed securities transactions. The System 
Open Market Account manager and the secretary will keep the Committee 
informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet 
that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
objectives of maximum employment and price stability.

    By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, March 24, 2015.
Thomas Laubach,
Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.
[FR Doc. 2015-07708 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
EXHIBIT 99.1


                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)

            Pursuant  to  section  906  of  the   Sarbanes-Oxley   Act  of  2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,  chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code),  each of the  undersigned  officers of Brilliant  Digital  Entertainment,
Inc., a Delaware  corporation (the "Company"),  does hereby certify with respect
to  Amendment  No. 2 to the Annual  Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the
year  ended  December  31,  2001 as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission (the "10-KSB/A Report") that:

(1)      the 10-KSB/A  Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section
         13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information  contained in the 10-KSB/A Report fairly  presents,  in
         all  material  respects,   the  financial   condition  and  results  of
         operations of the Company.




Date:  July 3, 2003                                  /s/ KEVIN BERMEISTER
                                                     --------------------------
                                                        Kevin Bermeister
                                                        President and
                                                        Chief Executive Officer






Date:  July 2, 2003                                  /s/ TYLER TARR
                                                     --------------------------
                                                        Tyler Tarr
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001022344
<NAME> SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                        124,466
<SECURITIES>                                        0         
<RECEIVABLES>                                 231,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                   14,476
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0<F1>
<PP&E>                                     11,662,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                709,114
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             13,112,916
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     7,972,381
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                 1,057,245
<COMMON>                                    3,550,306
<OTHER-SE>                                   (19,750)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               13,112,916
<SALES>                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            1,400,189
<CGS>                                               0         
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 753,581 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                6,599
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            420,280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               233,256
<INCOME-TAX>                                  233,256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           233,256
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 7,146
<CHANGES>                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                  240,402
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.05
<FN>
<F1>The SPG Operating Partnership does not report using a classified balance 
sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Generalized scheme for the atmospheric oxidation of a halogenated organic compound, CF 3 CXYH (X = Cl or F, and Y = Cl, H, Br, or CF 3 ). Radical intermedi ates are enclosed in ellipses. Ty

pical lifetime estimates are given in parenthesis.

http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/ozone/docs/UNEP98/UNEP98p56.html
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 40879 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
GREGORIO CASTORENA

- HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:14

- CR

- 332

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Gregorio Castorena

Hernandez raises an argument that is foreclosed by Unites States v. Morales

Mota, 704 F.3d 410, 412 (5th Cir. 2013) , which rejected the argument that the Texas offense of “burglary of a ha bitation” is broader than the generic, contemporary definition of “burglary of a dwelling” under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it defines the “owner” of a habitation as a person

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 2 2 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-40879 Document: 00513242125 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015No. 14

- 40879

2 with a “greater right to possession of the property than the actor.” Accordingly,
the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the
district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 14-40879 Document: 00513242125 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3104 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3104

To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District 
 of Columbia to receive Federal funding under such Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 28, 2021

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 to allow the District 
 of Columbia to receive Federal funding under such Act, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Prevention Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FOR FEDERAL FUNDING UNDER 
              THE COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT ACT OF 1972.

    Section 304(4) of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 
U.S.C. 1453(4)) is amended by inserting ``the District of Columbia,'' 
after ``the term also includes''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2339 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2339

To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to the ethanol waiver for Reid 
               vapor pressure limitations under such Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2021

Mrs. Fischer (for herself, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Grassley, Ms. Duckworth, 
 Mr. Thune, Ms. Smith, Ms. Ernst, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Durbin, 
 Mr. Moran, and Mr. Marshall) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 
                                 Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Clean Air Act with respect to the ethanol waiver for Reid 
               vapor pressure limitations under such Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Consumer and Fuel Retailer Choice 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ETHANOL WAIVER.

    (a) Reid Vapor Pressure Limitation.--Section 211(h) of the Clean 
Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(h)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (4)--
                    (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A), by 
                inserting ``or more'' after ``10 percent''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``additional 
                alcohol or''; and
            (2) in paragraph (5)(A), by inserting ``or more'' after 
        ``10 percent''.
    (b) Existing Waivers.--Section 211(f)(4) of the Clean Air Act (42 
U.S.C. 7545(f)(4)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``The Administrator, upon'' and inserting 
        the following:
                    ``(A) The Administrator, upon''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(B) A fuel or fuel additive that has been granted 
                a waiver under subparagraph (A) prior to January 1, 
                2017, and meets all of the conditions of that waiver, 
                other than the waiver's limits for Reid Vapor Pressure, 
                may be introduced into commerce if the fuel or fuel 
                additive meets all other applicable Reid Vapor Pressure 
                requirements.''.
                                 <all>
```
|                                                 | State      or   |     |
|------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|----------|
|                                                 | Country      of |     |
| Subsidiary      Name                                 | Incorp.         | Status   |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Migration, Inc.                        | Delaware        | Active   |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Europe,  AG                  | Germany         | Active   |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Micro Paint Repair, Inc.               | Nevada          | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Technologies de Mexico, S. A. de C. V. | Mexico          | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Migration de Mexico, S. A. de C. V.    | Mexico          | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Technologies de Guatemala, S. A.       | Guatemala       | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| "NeoMedia"      EDV - GmbH                           | Austria         | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Technologies UK Limited                | UK              | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Technologies Holding Company, B.V.     | Netherlands     | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Technologies of Canada, Inc.           | Canada          | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Technologies do Brasil Ltda            | Brazil          | Inactive |
|                                                 |            |     |
| NeoMedia      Tech, Inc.                             | Delaware        | Inactive |

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA F I L E D

NOV 30 2016

) Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Courts for the District of Columbla
)
)

ve ) Case No: 97-cr-293-RCL
)
WALTER PARKER, JR. )
)
)
Defendant. y
)
ORDER

Without objection, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of
Magistrate Judge Harvey.

Defendant’s use of medical marijuana is a violation of federal law. Defendants under
federal supervision are prohibited from using medical marijuana even if that use is in compliance
with D.C. law or the law of any other state.

The Court agrees, however, that in this case the defendant’s use was not a willful
violation of his supervised release, and therefore defendant’s term of supervised release shall not
be revoked.

Moreover, the Court agrees with Magistrate Judge Harvey that the conduct of the
defendant and the interests of justice lead to the conclusion in this case that the motion for early
termination of supervision as recommended shall be, and it hereby is, GRANTED.

It is SO ORDERED.

Date: November 30, 2016 Cae ¢ Fonte

Royed C. Lamberth
United States District Judge
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A2059. BALDRIDGE v. STUCKEY et al.

Ashley Baldridge appeals from the trial court’s order terminating her parental

rights in her minor son and granting the petition of relatives Orville and Jodi Stuckey

to adopt the boy. After filing her notice of appeal, but within the period of time in

which a motion for new trial may be filed, Baldridge filed a motion asking, among

other things, for the trial court to grant her a new trial. In that motion, Baldridge

asserted, among other things, that the trial court denied her requestfor the termination

hearing to be transcribed. From the record, it appears that the trial court did not

conduct any proceedings on Baldridge’s motion or rule on it, and the motion remains

pending.

The fact that Baldridge filed a notice of appeal before filing her motion seeking

a new trial

did not divest the trial court of jurisdiction since such divestiture does

not become effective during the period of time in which a motion for

new trial may be filed. In the event a motion for new trial is timely filed

as provided in OCGA § 5-5-40, the effectiveness of the divestiture is

then delayed until the motion for new trial is ruled upon and a notice of

appeal to the ruling has been filed or the period for appealing the ruling

has expired.

Hood v. State, 282 Ga. 462, 465 (651 SE2d 88) (2007) (quoting Housing Auth. of

Atlanta v. Geter, 252 Ga. 196, 197 (312 SE2d 309) (1984); other citation and

punctuation omitted). We have the authority to remand the appeal for the trial court

December 05, 2016
to rule on the motion, and remand is especially appropriate in this case, because the

motion raised a factual issue – whether the trial court denied Baldridge the

opportunity to have the termination hearing transcribed – that is particularly within

the trial court’s knowledge and is a central, disputed point in this appeal.

Accordingly, this case is hereby REMANDED to the trial court for that court

to consider Baldridge’s pending motion. The parties shall have the right to pursue

appellate review of orders entered by the trial court on remand by filing a timely

notice of appeal or application, or taking other appropriate action, pursuant to and

consistent with Georgia’s appellate practice act.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/05/2016
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

MAY Z 8 2015 

Mr. Craig Greer 

F edEx Express 

3131 Democrat Road 

Memphis, Tennessee 38118 

Dear Mr. Greer: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton , Washington 98057-3356 

This is in regard to your petition letter dated May 8, 2015, in which you requested 

exemption from the requirements of§§ 25.7850), 25.812(e), 25.857(e), and 25.1447(c)(2)(i) 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. The exemption, if granted, would allow the 

carriage of up to two supernumeraries in a Crew Rest Module (CRM) located in the Class E 

cargo compartment of Boeing Model 767-300F, 767-300BCF, and 767-300BDSF freighter 

airplanes. 

This request was posted to the Department of Transportation's Federal Docket Management 

System (at Regulations.gov) on May 15, 2015, and has been assigned Docket No. FAA20 15-1731. We are in the process of reviewing your request. We will contact you if we 

need additional information. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mr. John Shelden at (425) 227-2785, or by e-mail at John.Shelden@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

Deana M. Stedman 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service