alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
​

Exhibit 10.20
Form of amendment agreements to the employment agreement entered into between Robert Piconi and the Company's subsidiary Energy Vault, SA
​
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement
dated as of 04 December 2020
by and between
​
​
	Energy Vault SA
	(the Company)

	Via Pessina 13
	​

	6900 Lugano
	​

	Switzerland
	​

	​
	​

	​
	​



​
and
​
​
	​


	​



	Robert Piconi
	(the Employee)

	Date of Birth: [***]
	​

	[***]
	​

	​
	​

	​
	​



​
​
(The Company and the Employee are also referred to as Party or Parties)
​
​



​

​
Employment Agreement
Preamble
The Company and the Employee entered into an employment agreement dated 1 January 2018 (the Employment Agreement).
The Employee has access to very confidential and sensitive information of the Company and is considered a "key employee". Given additional undertakings for the non-competition and non­solicitation agreements, additional updates have been made to various severance and compensation elements in line with Swiss law.
Now therefore, the Parties wish to amend the Employment Agreement as outlined hereinafter (the Amendment).
Effective Date
This Amendment shall become effective at the date noted above upon execution by the Employee and approval of the Board of Directors.
Integration / modification to Employment Agreement.
1.Base Salary
Effective 1 December 2020, the Employee's annual gross base salary is CHF 395'000 paid in 12 instalments
2.Variable Incentive Bonus
The Employee shall be entitled to participate in a variable bonus program, whereby the annual bonus target is set 50% of the Employee's annual gross salary (subject to statutory deductions). The entitlement of the Target bonus will be based on the achievement of qualitative and quantitative objectives, as approved annually by the Board of Directors. The Employee shall not be eligible to receive any bonus if he is terminated from the Company for cause or disciplinary action.
3.Ancillary Benefits
The Company shall provide the Employee with a standard car allowance according to local norms (subject to statutory deductions). Reasonable expenses for foreign tax preparation and other expenses as they relate directly to the Employee's engagement with the Company may be submitted for reimbursement.
​

2



​

4.Notice Period and Severance
In the event this Agreement is unilaterally terminated by the Company with an ordinary notice of 90 days, a one-time severance payment equal to 12 months of the Employee's annual salary+ target bonus (subject to statutory deductions) will be made to the Employee. This severance payment shall be paid concurrent with and in addition to the final salary payment of the 90 day notice period. The severance payment shall not apply in the event the Employee chooses to resign from his position with the Company, or if the Employee is terminated from the Company for cause or disciplinary action.
​
​

3



​

Signatures
​
Energy Vault, Inc.
​
	/s/ Robert Piconi
	​

	Director
	​

	​
	​



​
The Employee:
	Lugano, CH
	/s/ Robert Piconi

	​
	​

	Place, date
	Robert Piconi



​

​
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries of the Operating Partnership

|Subsidiary                                                     |  | Jurisdiction  
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|The Retail Property Trust                                      |  | Massachusetts 
|Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.                          |  | Illinois      
|Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.                             |  | Texas         
|Shopping Center Associates                                     |  | New York      
|DeBartolo Capital Partnership                                  |  | Delaware      
|Simon Capital Limited Partnership                              |  | Delaware      
|M.S. Management Associates, Inc.                               |  | Delaware      
|Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd.                                       |  | Bermuda       
|Marigold Indemnity, Ltd.                                       |  | Delaware      
|Simon Business Network, LLC                                    |  | Delaware      
|Simon Brand Ventures, LLC                                      |  | Delaware      
|Simon Global Limited                                           |  | United Kingdom
|Simon Services, Inc.                                           |  | Delaware      
|Simon Property Group Administrative Services Partnership, L.P. |  | Delaware      
|SPGGC, Inc.                                                    |  | Virginia      
|Kravco Simon Investments, L.P.                                 |  | Pennsylvania  
|Kravco Simon Company                                           |  | Pennsylvania  
|Chelsea Property Group, Inc.                                   |  | Delaware      
|CPG Partners, LP                                               |  | Delaware      

Omits
names of subsidiaries which as of December 31, 2004 were not, in the aggregate, a "significant subsidiary".

120

---



QuickLinks
# C_2014358EN.01000201.xml

| 10.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 358/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 358/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 October 2014

2014/C 358/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2763 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78750 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1262 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2107 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1910 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,470 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,27 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1758 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4038 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8836 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4408 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4180 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8991 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6081 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6185 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 356,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0531 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,8269 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6461 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 525,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1343 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,021 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 50,9955 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,342 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0212 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0061 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,8001 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2763

JPY

Japanese yen

137,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78750

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1262

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2107

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1910

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,470

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,27

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1758

RON

Romanian leu

4,4038

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8836

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4408

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4180

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8991

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6081

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6185

KRW

South Korean won

1 356,70

ZAR

South African rand

14,0531

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,8269

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6461

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 525,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1343

PHP

Philippine peso

57,021

RUB

Russian rouble

50,9955

THB

Thai baht

41,342

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0212

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0061

INR

Indian rupee

77,8001

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2976 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to permit a Federal student 

loan borrower to elect to terminate repayment pursuant to income-based 

repayment and repay such loan under any other repayment plan for 

which the borrower is otherwise eligible. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2021 

Ms. MURKOWSKI (for herself, Mr. REED, and Mr. BRAUN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to permit 

a Federal student loan borrower to elect to terminate 

repayment pursuant to income-based repayment and 

repay such loan under any other repayment plan for 

which the borrower is otherwise eligible. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Repay5 ment Freedom Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2976 IS

1 SEC. 2. SWITCHING FROM INCOME-BASED REPAYMENT 

2 PLAN. 

3 Section 493C(b)(8) of the Higher Education Act of 

4 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1098e(b)(8)) is amended to read as fol5 lows: 

6 ‘‘(8) a borrower who is repaying a loan made 

7 under part B or D pursuant to income-based repay8 ment may elect, at any time, to terminate repayment 

9 pursuant to income-based repayment and repay such 

10 loan under any other repayment plan for which the 

11 borrower is otherwise eligible under this title; and’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-60178

ALL AMERICAN CHECK CASHING, INCORPORATED, A Mississippi 

Corporation; MID-STATE FINANCE, INCORPORATED, 

 Plaintiffs–Appellants,

v.

CHARLOTTE CORLEY, in her capacity as Commissioner of the Mississippi 

Department of Banking and Consumer Finance; VARIOUS JOHN DOES 

AND JANE DOES, Agents employed by the Mississippi Department of 

Banking and Consumer Finance, in their individual capacities; TAFT WEBB, 

an individual in his personal capacity; KRIS BOOKER, an individual in his 

personal capacity; KATHERINE CHRISTIAN, an individual in her personal 

capacity, 

 Defendants–Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:16-CV-55

Before CLEMENT, PRADO, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. See 5TH CIR. R. 47.6.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-60178 Document: 00513786839 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0443. ERIC JERRELL JACKSON v. THE STATE.

In 2013, Eric Jackson pled guilty to armed robbery (Count 1) and attempted

armed robbery (Count 2). For Count 1, the trial court imposed a 20-year sentence,

with the first 15 years to be served in prison, and the balance to be served on

probation. For Count 2, the court imposed a sentence of 5 years’ probation, to be

served consecutively to the sentence for Count 1. Consequently, the total sentence

consisted of 15 years in prison, to be followed by 10 years of probation, for a total

of 25 years.

In 2016, Jackson filed a motion to correct an illegal and/or void sentence,

arguing that his 25-year total sentence exceeded the statutory maximum sentence for

armed robbery. The trial court denied Jackson’s motion, and he filed this direct

appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA§ 17-10-1 (f), a court may modify a sentence during the year after

its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct appeal, whichever

is later. See Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 348 (691 SE2d 247) (2010). Once

this statutory period expires, a trial court may modify only a void sentence. Id. A

sentence is void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Jones

v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004). When a sentence falls within the

statutory range of punishment, it is not void and is not subject to post-appeal

modification beyond that provided in § 17-10-1 (f). Id. A direct appeal does not lie

from the denial of a motion to modify a sentence filed outside the statutory time period

November 23, 2016
unless the motion raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. Frazier,

302 Ga. App. at 348.

Jackson’s void-sentence claim is affirmatively refuted by the record. Contrary

to his assertion, the trial court did not impose a 25-year sentence for his armed

robbery conviction. Rather, the court imposed a 20-year sentence for his armed

robbery conviction and a 5-year sentence for his attempted armed robbery conviction,

each of which is within the statutory range of punishment. See OCGA §§ 16-4-6 (a)

(“A person convicted of the offense of criminal attempt to commit a crime punishable

by death or by life imprisonment shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than

one year nor more than 30 years.”); 16-8-41 (b) (“A person convicted of the offense

of armed robbery shall be punished by death or imprisonment for life or by

imprisonment for not less than ten nor more than 20 years.”).

Because Jackson has not raised a colorable void-sentence claim, we lack

jurisdiction to consider his appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Frazier, 302

Ga. App. at 348-349.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certif y that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/23/2016
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC



### Notice of GRANTAVIATION, INC. Docket

**DOT·OST~** 

### Intent to terminate service atTwin Hills, Alaska Pursuant 

### to 49 USC 

### 41734
90-Day Notice 

### ofTermination ofService
Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: R. Bruce McGlasson CEO 

### Grant Aviation, Inc P.O. Box 92200 

### Anchorage, AK 99509 907 529-6999 

### bmcglasson@flygrant.com



### May 30,2015

### Notice of GRANTAVIATION, INC. Intent to terminate service atTwin Hills, Alaska Pursuant to 

### 49 USC41734 Docket DOT-OST90 Day Notice ofTermination ofService Pursuant 

### to 49 

### USC 41734, Grant Aviation, Inc. hereby gives notice ofits intent 

### to terminate scheduled service toTwin Hills, Alaska, effective August 

### 28,2015. In accordance with Section 

### 41734, Grant Aviation, Inc. supplies the following information: 

### 1. Identification ofCarrier Grant Aviation, Inc P.O. Box 

### 92200 Anchorage, AK 

### 99509 Communications with respect 

### to this document should 

### be directed to: 

### R. Bruce McGlasson 

### CEO Grant Aviation, Inc P.O. Box 92200 Anchorage, AK 99509 

### 907 529-6999 bmcglasson @flygrant.com 

### 2. At the time ofthis notice Grant Aviation provides scheduled service 

### toTwin Hills, Alaska. 

### 3. Grant Aviation's service to Twin Hills consists of

### 6 flights weekly 

### 4. Grant Aviation, Inc provides the only scheduled air service to Twin Hills, Alaska, transporting passengers, cargo, and U.S. Mail 

### to this isolated community. 

### 5. The effective date ofthis notice is May 

### 30, 2015. Grant Aviation Is hereby providing public notice ofits intent to terminate scheduled air service toTwin Hills, Alaska on August 

### 28, 2015, providing 90days notice as required. Any objections tothis Notice toTerminate Service must be filed within 

### 20 days from the date ofthis filing.



# ?.~:«·~/) R. Bruce McGlasson



# /~ CEO Grant Aviation, Inc 

### P.O. Box 92200 Anchorage AK 99509-2200

### Certificate ofService
I hereby certify that Ihave caused 

### a copy ofthe foregoing Notice ofTermination to be served on May 30, 2015 to each of the persons named below. Kevin Schlemmer Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

### U.S. Department of

### Transportation kevin.schlemmer@dot.gov 

### Rich Sewell Aviation Policy Planner Division of

### Statewide Aviation Alaska DOT/PF rich.sewell@alaska.gov John Sharp Twin Hills Village Council P.O. Box TWA 

### Twin Hills, AK 99576 thvc@hotmail.com George Pleasant, Sr. 

### Twin Hills Native Corporation P.O. BoxTWA 

### Twin Hills, AK 99576-8996 WilliamlS@huges.net
# C_2016026EN.01000201.xml

| 23.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 January 2016

(2016/C 26/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0808 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,77 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4621 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,75459 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2738 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0950 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4685 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,026 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4587 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5273 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2572 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5380 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5316 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4204 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6606 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5421 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 292,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,8143 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1104 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6690 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 952,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6308 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,580 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,8930 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,921 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4550 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,0160 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,0945 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0808

JPY

Japanese yen

127,77

DKK

Danish krone

7,4621

GBP

Pound sterling

0,75459

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2738

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0950

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4685

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,026

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4587

RON

Romanian leu

4,5273

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2572

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5380

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5316

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4204

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6606

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5421

KRW

South Korean won

1 292,83

ZAR

South African rand

17,8143

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1104

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6690

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 952,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6308

PHP

Philippine peso

51,580

RUB

Russian rouble

85,8930

THB

Thai baht

38,921

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4550

MXN

Mexican peso

20,0160

INR

Indian rupee

73,0945

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3009 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 150
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3009

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove the prohibition 
        on States and territories against lowering their taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2021

 Mr. Braun introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

                            October 20, 2021

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove the prohibition 
        on States and territories against lowering their taxes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Let States Cut Taxes Act''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF RESTRICTION OF USE OF CORONAVIRUS STATE FISCAL 
              RECOVERY FUNDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 602(c) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 802(c)) is amended to read as follows:
            ``(2) Further restriction on use of funds.--No State or 
        territory may use funds made available under this section for 
        deposit into any pension fund.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 602 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 802) 
is further amended--
            (1) in subsection (d)(2)(A), by striking ``, including, in 
        the case of a State or a territory, all modifications to the 
        State's or territory's tax revenue sources during the covered 
        period'';
            (2) in subsection (e), by striking ``such subsection,'' and 
        all that follows through the period and inserting ``such 
        subsection.''; and
            (3) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (1); and
                    (B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (7) as 
                paragraphs (1) through (6), respectively.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if enacted on March 12, 2021.
                                                       Calendar No. 150

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 3009

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to remove the prohibition 
        on States and territories against lowering their taxes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 20, 2021

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED MA Y 2, 2013

NO. 03

- 11

- 00228

- CV

Appellants, Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland// Cross

- Appellant, Financial Indemnity Company, or properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Co mpany f/k/a

Charter County Mutual Insurance Company

v.

Appellee, Financial Indemnity Company, or properly Unitrin County Mutual Insurance Company f/k/a Charter County Mutual Insur ance Company// Cross

- Appellees,

Edmond L. Bisland III and Rhonda T. Bisland

APPEAL FROM 428TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PE MBERTON AND HENSON REVERSED AND RENDERED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

JUSTICE HENSON NOT P ARTICIPATING

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and t he same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the trial court’s

judgment: IT IS THEREFORE considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgment of the

trial court is reversed, and judgment is rendered in favor of t he appellee / cross

- appellant in

accordance with the jury’ s verdict. It is FURTHER ordered that the appellants/cros s

- appellees

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below; and that this decision

be certified below for obser vance.