18374 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices 

11On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The Web site location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

12See Certain Lined Paper Products From India: 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2010–2011, 78 FR 22232 (April 15, 2013). 

this changed circumstances review are 

addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, which is hereby adopted 

by this notice. A list of the issues which 

parties have raised, and to which we 

have responded in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum, is attached to 

this notice as an Appendix. 

The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System 

(‘‘ACCESS’’).11 ACCESS is available to 

registered users at http://

access.trade.gov and is available to all 

parties in the Central Records Unit, 

room 7046 of the main Department of 

Commerce building. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at http://

enforcement.ita.doc.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed and electronic version of the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum are 

identical in content. 

Final Results of Changed 

Circumstances Review 

For the Preliminary Results, the 

Department found that Kokuyo was the 

successor-in-interest to Riddhi based on 

evidence on the record. For these final 

results, the Department continues to 

find that the business transfer from 

Riddhi to Kokuyo resulted in no 

significant changes to management, 

production facilities, supplier 

relationships, and customers with 

respect to the production and sale of the 

subject merchandise. Thus, we 

determine that Kokuyo operates as 

essentially the same business entity as 

Riddhi with respect to the subject 

merchandise. 

Accordingly, the Department 

determines that Kokuyo is the 

successor-in-interest to Riddhi for the 

purpose of determining antidumping 

duty liability. 

Instructions to U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection 

As a result of this determination, we 

find that Kokuyo should receive the 

cash deposit rate previously assigned to 

Riddhi in the most recently completed 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain lined paper products from 

India. Consequently, the Department 

will instruct U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection to collect estimated 

antidumping duties for all shipments of 

subject merchandise exported by 

Kokuyo and entered, or withdrawn from 

warehouse, for consumption on or after 

the publication date of this notice in the 

Federal Register at the current cash 

deposit rate for Riddhi, which is de 

minimis.12 This cash deposit 

requirement shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Notification 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective order (APO) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.306. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a sanctionable 

violation. 

This notice is published in 

accordance with sections 751(b)(1) and 

777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.216(e). 

Dated: March 30, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Discussion of Interested Party Comments 

Comment 1: Time Periods Analyzed When 

Conducting a Successor-in-Interest CCR 

Analysis 

Comment 2: Whether Kokuyo’s Management 

Structure Is Similar to That of Riddhi 

Comment 3: Whether Kokuyo’s Production 

Facilities Are Similar to Those of Riddhi 

Comment 4: Whether Kokuyo’s Customer 

Base Is the Same as Riddhi’s 

Comment 5: Whether Kokuyo’s Supplier Base 

Is the Same as Riddhi’s 

V. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2015–07826 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Census Bureau 

Submission for OMB Review; 

Comment Request 

The Department of Commerce will 

submit to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for clearance the 

following proposal for collection of 

information under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

chapter 35). 

Agency: U.S. Census Bureau. 

Title: American Community Survey 

(ACS) Methods Panel Envelope 

Mandatory Messaging Test. 

OMB Control Number: 0607–0936. 

Form Number(s): ACS–1, ACS–1 

(Spanish), ACS CATI, ACS CAPI, ACS 

Internet. 

Type of Request: Emergency review. 

Number of Respondents: 24,000. 

Average Hours Per Response: 40 

minutes. 

Burden Hours: 16,000. 

Needs and Uses: 

The American Community Survey 

collects detailed socioeconomic data 

from about 3.5 million households in 

the United States and 36,000 in Puerto 

Rico each year. The ACS also collects 

detailed socioeconomic data from about 

195,000 residents living in Group 

Quarter (GQ) facilities. An ongoing data 

collection effort with an annual sample 

of this magnitude requires that the ACS 

continue research, testing and 

evaluations aimed at improving data 

quality, achieving survey cost 

efficiencies, and improving ACS 

questionnaire content and related data 

collection materials. The ACS Methods 

Panel is a research program that is 

designed to address and respond to 

issues and survey needs. One of those 

issues relates to respondent concerns 

about the tone of the mandatory 

message on the ACS mail materials. 

The outside of the envelopes that 

contain the instructions to respond 

online and the paper ACS questionnaire 

display the bold message, ‘‘YOUR 

RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW.’’ 

The prominent references to the 

mandatory participation in the ACS are 

concerning to many respondents. The 

Census Bureau developed the current 

presentation of the mandatory nature of 

participation based on previous research 

that identified a significant positive 

impact of these messages in encouraging 

high self-response rates and reducing 

the need for follow-up by phone or 

personal visits by Census Bureau 

interviewers. In order to be responsive 

to respondent concern with the 

prominence of the mandatory message 

on the envelopes, we are conducting the 

Envelope Mandatory Messaging Test. 

This test will measure the impact of 

removing the phrase ‘‘YOUR 

RESPONSE IS REQUIRED BY LAW’’ 

from the envelopes (Attachment C) used 

to mail the initial package (second 

mailing) as well as the replacement 

package (fourth mailing). This phrase 


tkelley on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 65 / Monday, April 6, 2015 / Notices 18375 

1See Notice of Amendment of Final 

Determinations: Certain Cut-To-Length CarbonQuality Steel Plate From India and the Republic of 

Korea; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: 

Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 

From France, India, Indonesia, Italy, and the 

Republic of Korea, 65 FR 6587 (February 10, 2000) 

(Order). 

2See Hyundai’s new shipper request dated 

February 27, 2015. 

3 Id., at Exhibit 1. 

4 Id. 

5 Id. 

6 Id., at Exhibits 2, and 3. 

7 Id., at Exhibit 1. 

8See the memorandum to the file entitled 

‘‘Certain Cut-To-Length Carbon-Quality Steel Plate 

from the Republic of Korea: Initiation Checklist for 

Countervailing Duty New Shipper Review of 

Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd.’’ dated concurrently with 

this notice. 

9See section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act. 

does not appear on other envelopes. We 

will continue to examine other possible 

revisions to the presentation of the 

mandatory nature of participation in the 

ACS, and will make future 

recommendations for additional testing. 

We have divided the monthly 

production sample of 295,000 addresses 

in 24 nationally representative groups of 

approximately 12,000 addresses each. 

For this test, planned for the May 2015 

ACS panel, we will use two randomly 

assigned groups for the experimental 

treatment group. The total sample size 

for the experimental treatment group is 

approximately 24,000 addresses. The 

remaining cases in the May 2015 panel 

will comprise the control and receive all 

standard ACS mailings (envelopes with 

the mandatory language still included). 

As we are using production cases for the 

test, the test will run through the 

complete three-month data collection 

period. 

Our primary evaluation measure for 

this test is the self-response rate. 

Comparing the self-response rates 

between the two treatments allows us to 

detect at least a 1.0 percentage point 

difference with 80% power and a=0.1; 

this calculation assumes a 50% selfresponse rate. Additional metrics of 

interest include total response rate, cost 

analysis and the impact on ACS 

estimates. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households, 

Frequency: One-time test as part of 

the monthly American Community 

Survey, 

Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. 

Legal Authority: Title 13, United 

States Code, Sections 141, 193, and 221. 

This information collection request 

may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov. 

Follow the instructions to view 

Department of Commerce collections 

currently under review by OMB. 

Written comments and 

recommendations for the proposed 

information collection should be sent 

within 16 days of publication of this 

notice to OIRA_Submission@

omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806. 

Dated: April 1, 2015. 

Sarah Brabson, 

NOAA PRA Clearance Officer, submitting for 

Census. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07862 Filed 4–3–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–07–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–580–837] 

Certain Cut-to-Length Carbon-Quality 

Steel Plate From the Republic of 

Korea: Initiation of Countervailing Duty 

New Shipper Review 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: April 6, 2015. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(the Department) received a timely 

request for a new shipper review of the 

countervailing duty order on certain 

cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate 

from the Republic of Korea. The 

Department has determined that the 

request meets the statutory and 

regulatory requirements for initiation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric 

Greynolds, AD/CVD Operations Office 

III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; Telephone: 

(202) 482–6071. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The countervailing duty order on 

certain cut-to-length carbon-quality steel 

plate from the Republic of Korea 

published in the Federal Register on 

February 10, 2000.1 Pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act), we received a 

timely request for a new shipper review 

of the order from Hyundai Steel Co., 

Ltd. (Hyundai).2 Hyundai certified that 

it is both the producer and exporter of 

the subject merchandise upon which the 

request was based.3

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(i)(I) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(b)(2)(i), 

Hyundai certified that it did not export 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the period of investigation 

(POI).4 In addition, pursuant to section 

751(a)(2)(B)(i)(II) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iii)(A), Hyundai certified 

that, since the initiation of the 

investigation, it has never been affiliated 

with any exporter or producer who 

exported subject merchandise to the 

United States during the POI, including 

those respondents not individually 

examined during the POI.5

In addition to the certifications 

described above, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.214(b)(2)(iv), Hyundai submitted 

documentation establishing the 

following: (1) The date on which it first 

shipped subject merchandise for export 

to the United States; (2) the volume of 

its first shipment; and (3) the date of its 

first sale to an unaffiliated customer in 

the United States.6 Finally, pursuant to 

19 CFE 351.214(b)(2)(v), Hyundai 

submitted a certification that it 

informed the government of the 

Republic of Korea that it will be 

required to provide a full response to 

the Department’s questionnaire.7

Period of Review 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.214(g)(2), in countervailing duty 

proceedings, the period of review (POR) 

for new shipper reviews initiated in the 

month immediately following the 

anniversary month will be the most 

recently completed calendar year. 

Therefore, the POR is January 1, 2014, 

through December 31, 2014. 

Initiation of New Shipper Review 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.214(d)(1), the 

Department finds that the request from 

Hyundai meets the threshold 

requirements for initiation of a new 

shipper review for shipments of certain 

cut-to-length carbon-quality steel plate 

from the Republic of Korea produced 

and exported by Hyundai.8

The Department intends to issue the 

preliminary results of this new shipper 

review no later than 180 days from the 

date of initiation and final results of the 

review no later than 90 days after the 

date the preliminary results are issued.9

We will instruct U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection to allow, at the option 

of the importer, the posting, until the 

completion of the review, of a bond or 

security in lieu of a cash deposit for 

each entry of the subject merchandise 

from Hyundai in accordance with 

section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 

19 CFR 351.214(e). Because Hyundai 

certified that it produced and exported 


tkelley on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES