alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.35


 


Below is the Power of Attorney issued by Xiaoli
Lou to Pure Value Trading Company (Shanghai) Limited (referred to below as “Zhifu Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.”). Certain
identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both immaterial and is the type that the registrant treats as
private and confidential.


 


POWER OF ATTORNEY


 


I, Xiaoli Lou (娄晓丽),
a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) and holder of PRC resident ID card number [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX],
in my capacity as a shareholder of Jihuiduo (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd, (积惠多(北京)科技有限公司,
“Company”), hereby irrevocably grant to any individual appointed in writing (“Authorised Person”)
by Zhifu Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (志福商贸(上海)
有限公司) in its sole discretion the authority to exercise the following powers and rights during the term
of this Power of Attorney:


 


		(a)	to receive all notices on my behalf regarding the shareholders’ meetings of the Company;



 


		(b)	to vote on my behalf at such shareholders meetings;



 


		(c)	to make any decisions on my behalf in accordance with my rights as a shareholder of the Company as granted
to me by law and in accordance with the Company’s articles of association; and



 


		(d)	to sign any relevant documents on my behalf and to take any action on my behalf as a shareholder of the
Company,



 


During the term of this Power of Attorney, I shall
not, without the prior written consent of the Authorised Person, exercise any of the powers and/or rights listed above.


 


This Power of Attorney will enter into effect
upon signing and will remain effective and irrevocable until all of my equity in the Company has been transferred to the Company or an
Authorised Person (or both). This Power of Attorney will survive and remain valid and effective in the event of my death or mental or
physical incapacity.


 


	 	Name:	Xiaoli Lou (娄晓丽)
	 	 	 
	 	Signature:	/s/ Xiaoli Lou
	 	Date:
Order entered December 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00472-CV

ROBBIE LESA HAMES HORTON, Appellant

V.

JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-01162-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellee’s December 4, 2016 unopposed second motion to extend 

time to file appellee’s brief. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED. Appellee’s brief shall be filed 

by January 4, 2017. We caution appellee that further extensions may not be granted absent 

extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 13.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of API Electronics Group Corp. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Claudio Mannarino, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report for the period ended May 31, 2004 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Claudio MannarinoClaudio MannarinoChief Financial Officer




November 7, 2005



144
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   31,029
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                57,818
<PP&E>                                         184,694
<DEPRECIATION>                                  17,333
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,650
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,103
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           22,651
<PREFERRED>                                     23,000
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      52,730
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   304,650
<SALES>                                        322,979
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               322,979
<CGS>                                          295,387
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  330,586
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (17,083)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,042
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (566)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,242)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                676
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  3,849
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,173)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2942 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2942

   To reauthorize the Crossroads of the American Revolution National 
                 Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2021

  Mr. Booker (for himself and Mr. Menendez) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To reauthorize the Crossroads of the American Revolution National 
                 Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Crossroads of the American 
Revolution National Heritage Area Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF FUNDING LIMITATION; REAUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Removal of Funding Limitation.--Section 297G(a) of the National 
Heritage Areas Act of 2006 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 109-338, 
120 Stat. 1844) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this subtitle $1,000,000 for each fiscal year.''.
    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 297H of the National Heritage Areas 
Act of 2006 (54 U.S.C. 320101 note; Public Law 109-338, 120 Stat. 1844) 
is amended by striking ``terminates on the date that is 15 years after 
the date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting ``terminates on 
September 30, 2036''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, John A. Morelli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 29, 2004



/S/    JOHN A.
MORELLIJohn A. Morelli Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
**EXHIBIT 31**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Ruairidh Campbell certify that:  

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Montana Mining Corp.;  

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;   

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;   

 

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;   

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and  

 

c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and  

 

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and   

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: July 20, 2007  

 

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 17, 2016

Order 

Clerk

December 7, 2016

154527(107)

COALITION PROTECTING AUTO NO-FAULT,

MARTHA E. LEVANDOWSKI, GERALD E. 

CLARK, MARY ELLEN CLARK, A. MICHAEL

DELLER, PAULINA M. DELLER and M. THOMAS

DELLER,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION OF

MICHIGAN, ILENE IKENS, RICHARD IKENS,

KENNETH WISSER, SUSAN WISSER,

GREGORY WOLFE and KAREN WOLFE, Plaintiffs-Appellees, SC: 154527

v COA: 314310

Ingham CC: 12-000068-CZ

MICHIGAN CATASTROPHIC CLAIMS

ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the joint motion of the Michigan Association of 

Broadcasters and the Michigan Press Association to participate as amici curiae and to file 

an amicus brief in support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The 

amicus brief submitted on December 1, 2016, is accepted for filing.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints George L. Lippe, Robert E. Sulentic and William P. Leiser the true and
lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998, and to sign any or all amendments to such
Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, each of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their
substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
                                        /s/  J. McDonald Williams
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                             J. McDonald Williams
Exhibit 10(a)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of
Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 3, 2013, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Financial Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 22, 2013,
with respect to the financial statements of the subaccounts of the TFLIC Separate Account BNY, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 39 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 033-83560) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related
Prospectus of Transamerica LandmarkSM NY Variable Annuity.

 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 
 April 22, 2013
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00362-CV

CLAYTON ARMSTRONG AND UTURN WORLD MINISTRIESAPPELLANTS

V.

HARTFORD CASUALTY 

INSURANCE COMPANY AS

SUBROGEE OF A.P. EQUIPMENT 

& RENTALS, INC. D/B/A AIR 

POWER SUPPLY & SERVICE

APPELLEE

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2016-001179-3

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 7, 2016, and November 7, 2016, we notified appellants in 

accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c) that we would dismiss this 

appeal unless the $205 filing fee was paid. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). 

Appellants have not paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

Because appellants failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of 

appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court’s order of August 28, 2015,

2

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; WALKER and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: December 1, 2016

 

2See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil 

Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi-district 

Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Aug. 28, 2015) (listing courts of appeals’

fees).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          87,946
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,845
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,977)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               292,745<F1>
<PP&E>                                          35,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                (18,230)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 468,515
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          178,262<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           345
<OTHER-SE>                                     191,667
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   468,515
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               517,523
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  431,121
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 76,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,674
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             46,451
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    46,451
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.28
<FN>
<F1>Includes real estate held for sale of $91,501.
<F2>Includes notes payable of real estate held for sale of $56,344.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-5018
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DANA LEE HUNTER, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:06-cr-00105-JAB) Submitted: May 23, 2007 Decided: July 10, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William C. Ingram, Jr., First Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anna Mills Wagoner, United States Attorney, Kearns Davis, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dana Lee Hunter entered a conditional plea of guilty to one count of possession of a firearm by a felon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2) (2000), reserving the right to challenge the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment. Hunter appeals, contending that his predicate state conviction, cruelty to animals, did not satisfy § 922(g)(1) as a matter of law. Finding no error, we affirm. Section 922(g)(1) prohibits anyone who has been convicted of a crime punishable by more than a year in prison to possess a firearm. 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Hunter asserts that, under North Carolina’s structured sentencing scheme law, his maximum sentence was less than twelve months because no aggravating factors were either admitted or found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. However, as Hunter concedes, his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Harp , 406 F.3d 242, 246-47 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 297 (2005). Thus, because it is undisputed that a sentence of over twelve months could be imposed on a defendant convicted of cruelty to animals in North Carolina, Hunter’s prior conviction was properly considered a predicate felony under § 922(g)(1). Accordingly, we affirm Hunter’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are- 3 - adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 2, 2019

No. 04-18-00762-CV

Anthony Chijioke NGWU,

Appellant

v.

Vera Amuche TONI,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-19833

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellee’s Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of April, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 133833 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 133833 

 COA: 271957 

Saginaw CC: 92-006519-FH 

LAMONT DONALE WIMBLEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 30, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d0723 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

July 30, 2007 

 Clerk