17716 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401– 

2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the 

EAA has been in lapse and the President, through 

Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR., 

2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended 

by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent 

being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August 

11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect 

under the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. § 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. 

IV 2010)). 

Plan in Washington, DC. The SEIS will 

provide new analysis based on changes 

to the original master development plan, 

and changes in governing regulations. 

DATES: Effective: April 3, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Justin Seffens, Corporate Facilities 

Director, AFRH, at (202) 541–7549, or 

Tim Sheckler, Project Manager, GSA, at 

(202) 401–5806. The U.S. General 

Services Administrator (GSA) is 

preparing the SEIS on behalf of AFRH. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to the requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA), 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 

4321–4347; the Council on 

Environmental Quality Regulations 

(Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 

Title 40, chapter V, parts 1500–1508); 

and AFRH’s Environmental Policy, 38 

CFR part 200, AFRH plans to prepare a 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement (SEIS) for the proposed 

Master Plan Development at the Armed 

Forces Retirement Home in Washington, 

DC. 

AFRH intends to prepare an SEIS to 

analyze the potential impacts resulting 

from the proposed changes to the 

original master development plan. 

Factors known to have changed since 

the previous study include construction 

of a new building, the Scott Building, on 

the AFRH campus; a $15 million 

restoration and expansion of the 

Lincoln’s Cottage historic site; closure of 

the Heating Plant and inclusion of the 

Plant in the development area; the 

anticipated development of the 

McMillan Reservoir parcel immediately 

south of AFRH; and other area 

development. 

Background 

Established in 1851, the AFRH in 

Washington, DC continues its mission 

as a retirement community for military 

veterans. The 276-acre site is currently 

developed with 93 structures including 

the U.S. Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home 

National Landmark District. 

In 2002, the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 

(Pub. L. 107–107, 24 U.S.C. 411, et seq.) 

gave the AFRH, with approval of the 

Secretary of Defense, authority to 

dispose of any property by sale, lease, 

or otherwise that is excess to the needs 

of the AFRH. In 2010, The National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111–84, 24 U.S.C. 

411) modified this authority to allow the 

Secretary of Defense (acting on behalf of 

AFRH) to lease non-excess property 

upon such terms as the Secretary 

considers will promote the purpose and 

financial stability of the Retirement 

Home or be in the public interest. 

Proceeds from such a lease are 

deposited to AFRH’s Trust Fund. To 

implement these authorities, AFRH 

prepared a Master Development Plan 

and issued a Record of Decision in 2008 

for its 276-acre campus in Washington, 

DC to guide the long-term use and 

development of the site. AFRH was 

unable to reach agreement with the 

initially selected developer. AFRH now 

anticipates releasing a new solicitation 

and selecting a new development 

partner. 

Alternatives Under Consideration 

AFRH will analyze the proposed 

action and no action alternatives for the 

proposed Master Development Plan. 

The proposed action alternative(s) will 

include development of a portion of the 

site for office, commercial, institutional, 

and residential uses. As part of the EIS, 

AFRH will study the impacts of each 

alternative on the human environment. 

Scoping Process 

In accordance with 40 CFR 

1502.9(c)(4), there will be no scoping 

conducted for this SEIS. 

Steven G. McManus, 

Chief Operating Officer, Armed Forces 

Retirement Home. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07621 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE CODE 3030–ZA–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

In the Matter of: Precision Image 

Corporation, 22424 76th Avenue 

Southeast, Woodinville, WA 98072 

Order Denying Export Privileges 

On October 28, 2013, in the U.S. 

District Court, Western District of 

Washington at Seattle, Precision Image 

Corporation, was convicted of violating 

Section 38 of the Arms Export Control 

Act (22 U.S.C. § 2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’). 

Specifically, Precision Image 

Corporation willfully exported from the 

United States technical data designated 

on the United States Munitions List, 

International Traffic in Arms 

Regulations, namely, a PCB, Sensor 

Motherboard, H–1 Gyro, PESK–7571, 

which is covered by Category XII(f) of 

the United States Munitions List, 

without having obtained from the 

United States Department of State a 

license or written approval for the 

export of this technical data. Precision 

Image Corporation was sentenced to 3 

years of probation, criminal fine of 

$300,000 and an assessment of $400. 

Section 766.25 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or 

‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent 

part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of 

Exporter Services, in consultation with 

the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny the export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of the Export 

Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR, 

or any order, license or authorization 

issued thereunder; any regulation, 

license, or order issued under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. § 1701–1706); 18 

U.S.C. §§ 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) 

of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 

U.S.C. § 783(b)), or section 38 of the 

Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

§ 2778).’’ 15 CFR. § 766.25(a); see also 

Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 

§ 2410(h). The denial of export 

privileges under this provision may be 

for a period of up to 10 years from the 

date of the conviction. 15 CFR. 

§ 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. app. 

§ 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of 

the Regulations states that the Bureau of 

Industry and Security’s Office of 

Exporter Services may revoke any 

Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) 

licenses previously issued in which the 

person had an interest in at the time of 

its conviction. 

BIS has received notice of Precision 

Image Corporation’s conviction for 

violating the AECA, and have provided 

notice and an opportunity for Precision 

Image Corporation to make a written 

submission to BIS, as provided in 

Section 766.25 of the Regulations. BIS 

has received and reviewed a submission 

from Precision Image Corporation. 

Based upon my review and 

consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Export Enforcement, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Precision Image 

Corporation’s export privileges under 

the Regulations for a period of 10 years 

from the date of Precision Image 

Corporation’s conviction. I have also 

decided to revoke all licenses issued 

pursuant to the Act or Regulations in 

which Precision Image Corporation had 

an interest at the time of its conviction. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices 17717 

1See Letter from Petitioners, Honey from the 

People’s Republic of China: Request for Thirteenth 

Administrative Review, dated December 31, 2014. 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 

6041, 6044 (February 4, 2015) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

3The three companies are: Dongtai Peak Honey 

Industry Co., Ltd.; Kunshan Xinlong Food Co., Ltd.; 

and Lee Hoong Kee Ltd. 

4See Letter from Petitioners, Thirteenth 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Honey from the PRC: Petitioners’ 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review, 

dated March 17, 2015. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

October 28, 2023, Precision Image 

Corporation, with a last known address 

of 22424 76th Avenue Southeast, 

Woodinville, WA 98072, and when 

acting for or on its behalf, its successors, 

assigns, directors, officers, employees, 

agents, or representatives, (the ‘‘Denied 

Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Precision Image 

Corporation by ownership, control, 

position of responsibility, affiliation, or 

other connection in the conduct of trade 

or business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Precision Image 

Corporation may file an appeal of this 

Order with the Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Industry and Security. 

The appeal must be filed within 45 days 

from the date of this Order and must 

comply with the provisions of Part 756 

of the Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to the Precision Image 

Corporation. This Order shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until October 28, 2023. 

Issued this 26th day of March, 2015. 

Thomas Andrukonis, 

Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07640 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–863] 

Honey From the People’s Republic of 

China: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) 

for the period December 1, 2013 through 

November 30, 2014. 

DATES: Effective April 2, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3927. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 31, 2014, based on a 

timely request for review 1 by the 

American Honey Producers Association 

and Sioux Honey Association 

(collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’), the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

the PRC covering the period December 

1, 2013 through November 30, 2014.2

The review covers three companies.3 On 

March 17, 2015, Petitioners withdrew 

their request for an administrative 

review on all the three companies listed 

in the Initiation Notice.4 No other party 

requested a review of these companies 

or any other exporters of subject 

merchandise. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested the 

review withdraws its request within 90 

days of the publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. In 

this case, Petitioners timely withdrew 

their request by the 90-day deadline, 

and no other party requested an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order. As a result, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we 

are rescinding, in its entirety, the 

administrative review of honey from the 

PRC for the period December 1, 2013 

through November 30, 2014. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Because the 

Department is rescinding this 

administrative review in its entirety, the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES