alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ending April 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Jean Perotti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:  Date: June 15, 2006           /s/ Jean Perotti
                                      --------------------------------
                                      Name:  Jean Perotti
                                      Title: Chief Financial Officer
                                      And Principle Accounting Officer
Exhibit 4.1

 

	
Certificate   No.                  
    	
No.   of shares      
    


 

Light In The Box Limited

 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ORDINANCE OF HONG KONG AUTHORIZED CAPITAL: HK$10,000.00 divided into 10,000 shares of HK$1.00 each.

 

THIS IS TO CERTIFY that                                              of                                                                               is the Registered Holder of                                        fully paid Share(s) of H.K.$1.00 each numbered                        to                           inclusive in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association thereof.

 

GIVEN under the Common Seal of the said Company in Hong Kong, this                          day of                               20         .

 

The common Seal of the Company is hereunto affixed in the presence of:

 

 


	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Director
    	
 
    	
Director/Secretary
    




 

N.B. — No transfer of any portion of the shares comprised in this Certificate can be registered unless accompanied by this Certificate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         146,399                 146,399
<SECURITIES>                                    13,084                  13,084
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,901                   1,901
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (150)                   (150)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,101                   3,101
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               171,384                 171,384
<PP&E>                                          12,904                  12,904
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (894)                   (894)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 200,031                 200,031
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,239                  29,239
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            66                      66
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,726                 170,726
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   200,031                 200,031
<SALES>                                          4,505                   6,605
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,505                   6,605
<CGS>                                            9,208                  11,193
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,208                  11,193
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,175                  75,041
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50                     150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (38,088)                (77,941)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,088)                (77,941)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,088)                (38,088)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.82)                 (28.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.82)                 (28.40)


</TABLE>
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential

. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: SINY CORP., Appellant

______________________

2018

- 1077

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board in No.

86754400.

______________________

O R D E R

______________________

Before P ROST

, Chief Judge, L OURIE and S TOLL

, Circuit Judges.

P ER C URIAM

.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office filed a request to reissue the nonprecedential opinion in thiscase as a precedential opinion. The court grants the request and recalls t he mandate of this court issued on March 7, 2019. T he precedential opinion issues concurrently with

this order. The clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.I N RE : SINY CORP

. 2

F OR THE C OURT

April 10, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      12,058,798
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,780,364
<ALLOWANCES>                                    79,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,259,977
<PP&E>                                       3,880,759
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,050,697
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              35,826,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,630,768
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,362,326
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,285,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                35,826,355
<SALES>                                     30,760,452
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,760,452
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            25,881,622
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                55,845
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             575,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,247,414
<INCOME-TAX>                                   612,748
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,634,666
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,634,666
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        






                                                                      



</TABLE>
#### Jackson, *ex dem.*Wadsworth, *against*Woodworth.

where a rule *slortto0TMam-*l!obta¡nedSa£ non^r^oui" ¡'¡“does not SW Pr°-ceedmgs, un-^ss the Court rect that it is feci;and¡f the obrnfeed with! d’aysf'it w¡u stay the proceedings of ,. course, though nothing is said m the rule as to its effect. It is, therefore, unnecessary to state in the rule, whether it is to operate as a stay of proceedings or not; unlegs by the special direction of the Court, on application for thatpurpose, 1 °

*FOOT,*for the plaintiff)

moved, in this, and several other suits by the same plaintiff) against different defendants; that the defendants pay to the plaintiff the costs of noticing and preparing the causes for trial at the last *Seneca*circuit. A rule for a commission to take the examination of witnesses residing in Hartford, in the state of *Connecticut,*was obtained by the defendant on the 13th of *Man*last, and the interroga- . . _ ^ ° tones settled on the 2d of *June,*and with the commission, were forwarded the next day. There was an affidavit of merits, and of the materiality of the evidence intended to be obtain ed under the commission. On the 12th of *June,*J820, the defendant’s attorneys informed the plaintiff’s attorney, that *136it would not be possible to have the commission executed in time for the circuit, and that they should rely on the issuing of the commission, as a stay of proceedings, &c. It appeared that the suit was commenced after *January*term, 1819, and that issues were joined in these causes, on the 14th of June, 1819, and that they were noticed for trial at the last *Seneca*circuit, held before Mr. Justice *Van Ness,*in *June*last, when the trml was put off on motion of the defendant’s counsel, the question as to the payment of the plaintiff’s costs being reserved by the Judge. Nothing was said in the rule entered for the commission about its operating, or not, as a stay of proceedings.

*Per Curiam.*

If a commission is obtained within the time required by the rules of the Court, that is, four days in term next after issue joined in the cause, it will stay proceedings, of course, without any thing being said to that effect in the rule. If the rule is obtained after the four days, it does not stay proceedings, unless so directed by the Court on application for that purpose. Though it may be the practice' of the bar to insert in the rule, when obtained after the four days, that it is *not*to operate as a stay of proceedings, such a precaution is unnecessary, as under the rules of the Court, it could not have that effect. In the present case, the commission was moved for long after the expiration of the four days; and the defendants must pay the costs of putting off the cause at the last circuit.

Motion granted.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO					18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO					SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

****

****

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xinhua China Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xianping Wang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.		
Dated: February 22, 2006                                                                                    /s/ Xianping Wang                                                                                                                                                          Xianping Wang, President, Chief			                                                                                                                            Executive Officer and Director
[Civ. No. 8416.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

June 18, 1934.]

#### E. B. SPENCER, Appellant, v. ASSOCIATED ROCK COMPANY (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

*317Davis & Thorne for Appellant.

John B. Haas and John D. Home for Respondent Associated Rock Company.

CRAIG, Acting P. J.

A former director and vice-president having instituted suit against the Associated Rock Company, a corporation, for alleged compensation for services, and joined others alleged to have assumed the indebtedness, a nonsuit as to the latter and judgment in favor of the corporation were granted, from which plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff and the company owned adjoining lands which became the subject of negotiations for financing and sale. A share of stock was issued to plaintiff, he was elected director and vice-president and the board as so constituted endeavored to consummate various transactions toward accomplishment of the common design. The defendants denied any agreement to pay him except from proceeds of their united efforts. It was testified by plaintiff in support of his claim that his associates had expressed a desire to pay a salary each month for such portion of his time as might be needed; that they visited the properties and made trips to other parts of the state, and that at one time when pressed for funds with which to pay taxes he received certain notes of the company, but that the same were returned by him; that “every time we had a transaction under way, why they said we would wait until we got through with that matter ór finished that transaction” in order that funds should be available for each of the parties, and that he *318“naturally figured, it would come out of tbe finances of that transaction”. Evidence on behalf of the defendants was to the effect that at no time did they have funds or consummate á transaction.

It is contended that findings that plaintiff was not employed at an agreed monthly compensation and that the rock company’s co-defendants did not for a consideration assume his claim therefor or guarantee the same were contrary to the evidence. It lay within the province of the trial court to accept or reject the testimony of any witness. The plaintiff swore that his associated directors agreed both “as individuals” and “as stockholders” that they would pay for services rendered in said transactions. This statement as to the capacity in which they agreed, if at all, amounted to a mere conclusion, and since the contingency failed the subject of the alleged guaranty fell therewith, and its validity became immaterial. Hence the findings of the trial court are conclusive, and other errors, if any, including the granting of a nonsuit^ need not be considered.

The attempted appeal from the order denying a new trial is dismissed and the judgment is affirmed.

Desmond, J., and Scott, J., pro *iem.,*concurred.
Exhibit 4.16

 

Power of Attorney

 

THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY (hereinafter, the “Power of Attorney”) is executed by Weijie MA (Domicile [*], ID card No.: [*]) as of December 5, 2011 and issued to Xin ZHOU (Domicile [*], ID card No.: [*]) (hereinafter, the “Entrusted Person”).

 

I, Weijie MA, hereby entrust the Entrusted Person with full representative power to exercise the following rights owned by me in the capacity of a shareholder of Shanghai Yi Xin E-Commerce Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “Company”) on my behalf:

 

(1)              As my representative, to propose to convene and attend shareholders’ meetings of the Company according to the articles of association of the Company;

 

(2)              As my representative, to exercise, on my behalf, voting rights on all matters requiring discussion or resolutions of the shareholders’ meetings of the Company, including without limitation, the appointment and election of the Company’s directors and other officers, who should be appointed and removed by the shareholders;

 

(3)              As my representative, to exercise other voting rights of a shareholder as specified in the articles of association of the Company (including any other shareholder voting rights as specified in the amended articles of association).

 

I hereby irrevocably confirm that this Power of Attorney shall continue to be valid until the Shareholder Voting Right Proxy Agreement executed by and between Shanghai Yi Yue Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “WFOE”), the Company and the shareholders of the Company as of December 5, 2011 expires or is early terminated, unless the WFOE gives me a direction to replace the Entrusted Person.

 

Authorization is hereby made.

 

	
 
    	
Name: Weijie MA
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/ Weijie MA
    
	
 
    	
Date: December 5, 2011
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 23.2
 
                      Consent of Independent Accountants


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Nos. 333-18165 and 333-18167) on Form S-8 of TCI Satellite
Entertainment, Inc. of our report dated February 14, 1997, except as to Note 13,
which is as of March 9, 1997, relating to the financial statements of Primestar
Partners L.P., which report appears in the December 31, 1996 Annual Report on
Form 10-K of TCI Satellite Entertainment, Inc.

PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP


Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 25, 1997
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWERS OF ATTORNEY
                               MAZEL STORES, INC.

       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that MAZEL STORES, INC., an Ohio
corporation, and each person whose name is signed below hereby constitutes and
appoints Reuven Dessler, Brady Churches and Sue Atkinson, and each of them,
their attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for and on behalf of Mazel Stores, Inc. and the undersigned
directors and/or officers of Mazel Stores, Inc., and each of such directors and
officers, to sign the Mazel Stores, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended January 30, 1999, and any and all amendments thereto, and
related documents, and to file the same, with Exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with
such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact
and agents or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

       This Power of Attorney of Mazel Stores, Inc., and the directors and
officers of Mazel Stores, Inc. may be executed in multiple and counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing
it.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed this 12th day
of April 1999.

          MAZEL STORES, INC.                By: /s/ Reuven Dessler
                                               --------------------------
                                                Reuven Dessler,
                                                Chairman of the Board and
                                                Chief Executive Officer

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:

 /s/ Reuven Dessler                            /s/ Brady Churches
------------------------------                ---------------------------
Reuven Dessler,                               Brady Churches
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer

 /s/ Jacob Koval                               /s/ Jerry Sommers
------------------------------                ---------------------------
Jacob Koval                                   Jerry Sommers

 /s/ Ned L. Sherwood                           /s/ Charles Bilezikian
------------------------------                ---------------------------
Ned L. Sherwood                               Charles Bilezikian

 /s/ Robert Horne                              /s/ Phillip Cohen
------------------------------                ---------------------------
Robert Horne                                  Phillip Cohen

                                /s/ Sue Atkinson
                               -------------------------------------
                               Sue Atkinson
                               Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                               (Principal Accounting Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00139-CR

Virginia Shanta MCKINLEY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR5186

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 7, 2016

MOTION TO DISMISS GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and for expedited issuance of the mandate. 

The motion is granted and this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We order the 

clerk of this court to immediately issue the mandate. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1(c).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 29 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 29

To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain 
    programs relating to nonpoint source management, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2021

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize certain 
    programs relating to nonpoint source management, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Local Water Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. NONPOINT SOURCE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS.

    Section 319 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1329) is amended by striking subsection (j) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(j) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            ``(1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        to carry out subsections (h) and (i) $200,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2021 through 2025, of which not more than 
        $7,500,000 for each fiscal year may be used to carry out 
        subsection (i).
            ``(2) Availability.--Amounts made available under paragraph 
        (1) shall remain available until expended.''.
                                 <all>
```