alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69849-69850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27962]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK OF THE UNITED STATES

[Public Notice 2013-6008]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and comments request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 69850]]

    Form Title: EIB 92-36 Application for Issuing Bank Credit Limit 
(IBCL) Under Lender or Exporter-Held Policies.
SUMMARY: The Export-Import Banks of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as 
part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent 
burden, invites the general public and other Federal Agencies to 
comment on the proposed information collection, as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
    This collection of information is necessary, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. 
Sec. 635(a)(1), to determine eligibility of the applicant for Ex-Im 
Bank assistance.
    The application tool can be reviewed at: http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/Form%20EIB%2092-36%20v3.pdf.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 21, 2014 to be 
assured of consideration.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically on 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV or by mail to Michele Kuester, Export-Import Bank 
of the United States, 811 Vermont Ave. NW., Washington, DC.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title and Form Number: EIB 92-36 Application for Issuing Bank 
Credit Limit (IBCL) Under Lender or Exporter-Held Policies.
    OMB Number: 3048-0016.
    Type of Review: Regular.
    Need and Use: This form is used by an insured exporter or lender 
(or broker acting on its behalf) in order to obtain approval for 
coverage of the repayment risk of an overseas bank. The information 
received allows Ex-Im Bank staff to make a determination of the 
creditworthiness of the foreign bank and the underlying export sale for 
Ex-Im Bank assistance under its programs.
    This form has been updated to include a new Certification and 
Notices section as well as a new statement explaining Ex-Im Bank's 
limitation on support for goods subject to trade measures or sanctions.

Affected Public

    This form affects entities involved in the export of U.S. goods and 
services.
    Annual Number of Respondents: 480.
    Estimated Time per Respondent: 1 hour.
    Annual Burden Hours: 480 hours.
    Frequency of Reporting of Use: As needed.

Government Expenses

    Reviewing time per year: 480 hours.
    Average Wages per Hour: $42.50.
    Average Cost per Year: $20,400.
    (time * wages)
    Benefits and Overhead: 20%.
    Total Government Cost: $24,480.

Kalesha Malloy,
Agency Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2013-27962 Filed 11-20-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2728 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2728

To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the coverage of 
        Coronavirus Relief Fund payments to Tribal Governments.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2021

 Mr. Sullivan (for himself, Ms. Murkowski, Ms. Hirono, and Mr. Schatz) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title VI of the Social Security Act to extend the coverage of 
        Coronavirus Relief Fund payments to Tribal Governments.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF COVERAGE OF CORONAVIRUS RELIEF FUND PAYMENTS TO 
              TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS.

    Section 601(d)(3) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 801(d)(3)) 
is amended by inserting ``(or, in the case of a Tribal government, 
December 31, 2022)'' after ``December 31, 2021''.
                                 <all>
```
CONWAY ORLANDO
THOMAS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 495

____ _________________________/

Opinion filed August 11, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County

. James B. Fensom , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Danielle Jorden, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR

.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Accesspoint, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the for the three months ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, William Barber, President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                     ACCESSPOINT CORPORATION

                                     By /S/ WILLIAM R. BARBER
                                        ------------------------------
                                        William R. Barber,
                                        Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and President
May 17, 2004
# C_2016146EN.01000301.xml

| 26.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 146/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Belgium

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : International Missing Children’s Day

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The inner part of the coin displays in its centre the face of a child surrounded by the words ‘MISSING-DISPARU-VERMIST’, ‘WWW.CHILDFOCUS.BE’ and the trilingual indication of nationality ‘BELGIQUE-BELGIE-BELGIEN’ followed by the year 2016. The mark of the Brussels mint, a helmeted profile of the archangel Michael and the signature mark of the Master of the Mint appear to the left and right respectively of the face.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 1 020 000 coins

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : May 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# OAR Box 1828

Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 201 ) ll-K-(I)-1 4 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:55AM Sheet 201 of 325 P. 1P. 2

II-K-(I)-1 4
TH E SUBSTITUTIO N

POTENTIA L O F ALTERNATIV E FUEL S FO R NATURAL GA S I

N SELECTE D INDUSTRIES . EEA , Inc . Jun e 8 , 1978 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)-1 4
### 78 Additional Recordkeeping

Inspection As Required by 40 CFR 61 Subpart FF Quarterly Inspection Certification Quarterly

Tank 390 Throughput Supplier invoices Purchase frequency Emergency Generat ors Hours of operation and description of use Install a n on

- resettable hour meter as required by 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ During operation

Inspection Records of inspection of air cleaner,

hoses and belts as required by 40 CFR

63 Subpart ZZZZ Annually

Star tup, Shutdown

Malfunction time and

duration Operating record and maintenance

records for oil and filter changes as required by 40 CFR 63 Subpart ZZZZ Per Occurrence and annually



### Veolia utilizes an extensive preventative maintenance (PM) program to keep e quipment operational and prevent breakdowns and failures. This includes aspects such as documenting detailed maintenance histories on equipment, routine inspection

, and lubrication programs for high

- wear equipment and non

- destructive testing of piping and vessels using techniques like ultrasound to assess integrity. The frequency of these activities varies depending upon the equipment, PM activity

, and the incinerator’s shutdown schedule.

B. Reporting Requirements

Veolia reports information as required b y the Hazardous Waste Combustor MACT standard, 40 CFR 63. Unit 2, 3, 4, Material Processing Area 1 and 2, Bulk Feed Building, Lab Pack Repack Area and all tanks that are used for the storage of liquid waste are also subject to requirements of 40 CFR 61 Su bpart FF (Benzene NESHAP). In addition to the general reporting requirements summarized in the following tables, these units comply with all applicable reporting requirements as required by 40 CFR 61 Subpart FF.

General Reporting Requirements

Reference Report

63.10(d)(4) Compliance progress reports, if required as a condition of an

extension of the compliance date granted under Sec. 63.6(i). 63.10(d)(5)(i) Periodic startup, shutdown, and malfunction reports. 63.10(d)(5)(ii) Immediate startup, shutdown , and malfunction reports.

63.10(e)(3) Excessive emissions and continuous monitoring system

performance report and summary report.

63.1206 (c) (2)(ii)(B) Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan.

63.1206 (c) (3)(vi) Excessive exceedances reports.

63.1206 (c) (4)(iv) Emergency safety vent opening reports.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 10-3859

___________

Raymond Gearhart, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Marty C. Anderson, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: May 6, 2011

Filed: June 16, 2011

___________

Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Gearhart is involuntarily committed under 18 U.S.C. § 4246, and is

confined at the United States Medical Center for Federal Prisoners in Springfield,

Missouri. He filed this pro se civil action complaining, among other things, that he

was being forced to take antipsychotic drugs. The district court construed the action

as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and denied relief after considering the

government’s evidence. To the extent that Mr. Gearhart’s pleadings sounded in

habeas corpus, we agree that his custody was lawful for the reasons the district court

stated. 
As we review Mr. Gearhart’s filings, however, we conclude that the gravamen

of his complaint was a challenge to the lawfulness of his forced medication, which

could be raised as a Bivens1

 action, see Papantony v. Hedrick, 215 F.3d 863, 864-65

(8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), or as a constitutional claim for injunctive relief, see

Simmat v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons, 413 F.3d 1225, 1231-32, 1236 (10th Cir. 2005);

see also Washington v. Harper, 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Thus, we remand for the district

court to consider such claims after affording Mr. Gearhart an opportunity to amend

his complaint. Cf. Young v. Armontrout, 795 F.2d 55, 56 (8th Cir. 1986) (remanding

to district court with instructions to treat pro se habeas petition as 42 U.S.C. § 1983

complaint and to grant leave to amend complaint liberally as justice requires). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of habeas relief, and otherwise

remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

______________________________

1

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S.

388 (1971). 

-2-
#### Zook v. Zook

*505
      *D. Patrick Zimmerman,*for plaintiff.

*Hassel, Yost & Sorrentino,*for defendant.

December 17, 1976.

BUCHER, *J.,*

The matter before the court involves preliminary objections filed by plaintiff to defendant’s counterclaim.

This is an equity action between divorced parties for the partition of jointly owned real estate.

The parties were married January 28, 1967, and divorced April 30, 1976. Between those dates they acquired the real estate which is the subject of this action. One parcel was purchased January 6, 1973, and the other on August 9, 1974.

In his counterclaim defendant alleges that the parties are indebted to defendant’s father on a note dated April 10, 1970, in the amount of $3,000 and to defendant’s father and mother on a note dated August 19, 1974, in the amount of $4,000. Defendant avers “that said sum(s) should be deducted from the proceeds of any sale of joint property before distribution is made.”

Plaintiff in her preliminary objections contends that defendant’s parents are the real parties in interest on the notes and are not parties to this suit. She alleges a misjoinder of a cause of action. Defendant contends that the allegation of a joint liability is not a “cause of action” and that the counterclaim is really an action for an accounting and/or a contribution.

Defendant can’t have it both ways. If the counterclaim is not a cause of action then it violates Pa. R.C.P. 1510 which provides that “only a cause of action . . . which arises from the same transaction ...” may be pleaded. We hold that paragraphs 12 and 13 of the counterclaim do not constitute a cause of action within the meaning of the *506aforesaid role. Nor is this a case where an accounting can be demanded in equity.

Accordingly, the court enters the following

ORDER

And now, December 17, 1976, for the foregoing reasons plaintiff’s preliminary objections to defendant’s counterclaim are sustained and paragraphs 12 and 13 of the counterclaim are stricken.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001022644
<NAME> ELDORADO RESORTS LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           8,087
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,881
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,620
<INVENTORY>                                      2,904
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,640
<PP&E>                                         237,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                  82,473
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,572
<BONDS>                                        122,999
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,258
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,315
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  134,705
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   842
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,151
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,617
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              9,617
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,617
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2494

MEREDITH COOK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Greenville. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (6:14-cv-01294-JMC)

Submitted: October 25, 2016 Decided: December 6, 2016

Before MOTZ, THACKER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sarah H. Bohr, BOHR & HARRINGTON, LLC, Atlantic Beach, Florida, 

for Appellant. Nora Koch, Acting Regional Chief Counsel, 

Charles Kawas, Acting Supervisory Attorney, Jillian Quick, 

Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; William N. Nettles, United States 

Attorney, Barbara Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Meredith Cook appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and upholding the 

Commissioner’s denial of her application for supplemental 

security income. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Cook v. Colvin, No. 6:14-cv-01294-JMC 

(D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Lula V. Jones, Resp’t, *v.*Lewis Jones, *et al,*Appl’t.

*(Court of Appeals,*

*Filed January*18, 1887.)

Appeal fbom coubt of Common Pleas of New Yobk. — Obdeb hecessaby Code Civ. Pbo., § 190.

An appeal to the court of appeals from a judgment of the general term of the court of common pleas of New York county cannot be taken, where the case originated in the city court of New York, without first obtaining leave from the court of common pleas to appeal as required by Code Civ. Pro. § 190.

Constitutionality of Laws, 1886, Chap. 418.

All the provisions of chapter 418, Laws 1886, are connected as parts of a single scheme and the main purpose of the act, being unconstitutional the incidental provisions must fall.

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the general term court of common pleas of New York county, affirming a judgment of the general term of the city court, in favor of plaintiff.

*N. W.*Lazetr, for motion. *E. P. Wilder,*opposed.

Rapallo, J.

In this case the defendant took an appeal from the judgment of the general term of the city court to the court of common pleas, where the judgment was affirmed after the passage of chapter 418 of Laws of 1886. From the judgment of affirmance the defendant appealed to this court without first obtaining leave from the court of common pleas to appeal, as required by section 190 of the Code, and the respondent now

moves on that ground to dismiss the appeal. The appellant contends that although the act of 1886 is held to be unconstitutional in so far as it dispenses with an appeal to the court of common pleas, it should still be held valid and effectual in so far as it has the effect of dispensing with the necessity of an order of the court of common pleas allowing an appeal from its judgment.

After giving the point due consideration we have concluded that the main object of the act of 1886 having failed, we should not divide it into parts and sustain the portion which is claimed to obviate the necessity of an order allowing the’ appeal, but that all the provisions are connected as parts of a single scheme, and that the incidental provisions must fall with the failure of the main purpose of the act.

An order allowing the appeal was consequently necessary, and for want of such an order the appeal should be dismissed, without costs.

All concur.
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Jean
      Perrotti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:
                Date: February 19, 2008
            /s/
                Jean PerrottiName:
                Jean PerrottiTitle:
                Chief Financial OfficerAnd
                Principle Accounting Officer