alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2959 

AN ACT 

To provide that, due to the disruptions caused by COVID– 

19, applications for impact aid funding for fiscal year 

2023 may use certain data submitted in the fiscal year 

2022 application. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2959 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supplemental Impact 

3 Aid Flexibility Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. IMPACT AID PROGRAM. 

5 Due to the public health emergency directly relating 

6 to COVID–19 and notwithstanding sections 7002(j) and 

7 7003(c) of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act 

8 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7702(j), 7703(c)), a local educational 

9 agency desiring to receive a payment under section 7002 

10 or 7003 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 7702, 7703) for fiscal 

11 year 2023 that also submitted an application for such pay12 ment for fiscal year 2022 shall, in the application sub13 mitted under section 7005 of such Act (20 U.S.C. 7705) 

14 for fiscal year 2023— 

15 (1) with respect to a requested payment under 

16 section 7002 of such Act— 

17 (A) use the data described in section 

18 7002(j) of such Act relating to calculating such 

19 payment that was submitted by the local edu20 cational agency in the application for fiscal year 

21 2022; or 

22 (B) use the data relating to calculating 

23 such payment for the fiscal year required under 

24 section 7002(j) of such Act; and 

25 (2) with respect to a requested payment under 

26 section 7003 of such Act— 
3 

†S 2959 ES

1 (A) use the student count data relating to 

2 calculating such payment that was submitted by 

3 the local educational agency in the application 

4 for fiscal year 2022, provided that payments for 

5 fiscal year 2023 shall be calculated by the Sec6 retary using the expenditures and rates de7 scribed in clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) of sec8 tion 7003(b)(1)(C) of such Act that would oth9 erwise apply for fiscal year 2023; or 

10 (B) use the student count data relating to 

11 calculating such payment for the fiscal year re12 quired under section 7003(c) of such Act. 

Passed the Senate December 13, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2959 

AN ACT 

To provide that, due to the disruptions caused by 

mitted in the fiscal year 2022 application. for fiscal year 2023 may use certain data subCOVID–19, applications for impact aid funding
EXHIBIT 32.21



STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350



I, Brian M. Beattie, the chief financial officer of SupportSoft, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



|(i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 8, 2005



/s/ BRIAN M. BEATTIEBrian M. BeattieExecutive Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer




A signed original of this
written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to SupportSoft, Inc. and will be retained by SupportSoft, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

|1 | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed filed with the SEC and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

REBECCA CATHERINE STEIN :

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 3041 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

(Allegheny County Court of Common
Pleas, No. CP

- 02

- CR

- 0007485

- 2023 )

Attorney Registration No. 321862

(Allegheny County)

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5 th day of April , 2024, upon consideration of the Joint Petition to

Temporarily Suspend an Attorney , the rule to show cause entered on March 25, 2024

, is

discharged

, and the Joint Petition is granted

. Rebecca Catherine Stein is placed on

temporary suspension

, see Pa.R.D.E. 214(d)(5) , and shall comply with the provisions of

Pa.R.D.E 217.
Order entered August 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01540-CV

STEVEN V. TIPPS, Appellant

V.

PURPLE TREE, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-18-04540-B

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 13, 2019 second motion for an extension of time 

to file his brief on the merits. He requests a forty-eight hour extension of time “through August 

14, 2019.” As of today’s date, appellant has not tendered his brief. Accordingly, we DENY

appellant’s motion as moot.

On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER appellant to file his brief on the merits by 

August 26, 2019, and caution him that failure to do so may result in dismissal of this appeal for 

want of prosecution without further notice. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1).

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 7 0 2 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A ,
P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
.
P H I L L I P R O B I N E T T E ,
D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 4 : 0 9

- C R

- 7 0

- 1 0

B e f o r e K I N G , H I G G I N B O T H A M , a n d B E N A V I D E S , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t P h i l l i p R o b i n e t t e h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e
t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 ) , a n d U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. F l o r e s , 6 3 2 F

. 3 d 2 2 9 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 1 1 )

. R o b i n e t t e h a s f

i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. T h e r e c o r d i s i n s u f f i c i e n t l y d e v e l o p e d t o a l l o w

c o n s i d e r a t i o n a t t h i s t i m e o f R o b i n e t t e ’ s c l a i m s o f i n e f f e c t i v e a s s i s t a n c e o f

c o u n s e l

. S e e U n i t e d S t a t e s v
. C a n t w e l l , 4 7 0 F

. 3 d 1 0 8 7 , 1 0 9 1 ( 5 t h C i r
. 2 0 0 6 )

. W e h a v e r e v i e w e d c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f a n d t h e r e l e v a n t p o r t i o n s o f t h e r e c o r d r e f l e c t e d U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 8, 201 1 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-40702 Document: 00511501846 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2011N o
. 1 0

- 4 0 7 0 2

t h e r e i n , a s w e l l a s R o b i n e t t e ’ s r e s p o n s e
. W e c o n c u r w i t h c o u n s e l ’ s a s s e s s m e n t
t h a t t h e a p p e a l p r e s e n t s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e l l a t e r e v i e w
. A c c o r d i n g l y , t h e m o t i o n f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r

r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

.

2 Case: 10-40702 Document: 00511501846 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2011
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2404

In Re: MARY D. SLAEY,

Debtor.

---------------------------------

MARY D. SLAEY,

Debtor – Appellee,

v.

P.H. HARRINGTON, JR.,

Creditor - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-01210-TSE-JFA)

Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: December 7, 2016

Before WILKINSON, TRAXLER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alan J. Cilman, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellant. Gregory Counts, 

TYLER, BARTL, RAMSDELL & COUNTS, PLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

P.H. Harrington, Jr., appeals from the district court orders 

determining that Harrington’s claim asserted in Mary D. Slaey’s 

bankruptcy case was barred by the statute of limitations, and 

denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record 

and the arguments presented on appeal and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Harrington v. Slaey, No. 1:14-cv-01210-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. 

Sept. 1, 2015 & filed Oct. 14, 2015; entered Oct. 15, 2015). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 05, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 05, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0083. SIERRA HARDIMAN, AS NATURAL MOTHER AND NEXT FRIEND TO 

JACOB MORRIS, MINOR v. NEWTON HEALTH SYSTEM, INC..

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2015CV2431
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STEVEN R. HANEY

, §

§ No. 5 75 , 2015

Defendant Below

, §

Appellant, §

§ Court Below:

v. §

§ Superior Court of the

BANK OF AMERICA, § State of Delaware

§

§ C. A. No. S14L

- 10

- 029

Plaintiff Below

, §

Appellee. §

Submitted: May 4, 2016

Decided: May 5 , 2016

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; HOLLAND and VALIHURA

, Jus tices

.

O R D E R

This 5 th day of May 201 6 , the Court, having considered this matter on the b riefs of

th e parties, has concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its decision of October 16, 2015

.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment of the

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
**Exhibit 24.8**

** **

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

** **

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E.Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher Kirk and eachof them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitutionand resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and to sign anyor all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each andevery act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do inperson, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-factor their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof.

 

 
|   | /s/ JEFFREY M. HELLER |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Jeffrey M. Heller     |   |

 

----
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3050 

To remove limitations under Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, and the Department 

of Veterans Affairs on benefits for persons in custody pending disposition 

of charges. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2021 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. BROWN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. 

BOOKER, Mr. PADILLA, and Ms. BALDWIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To remove limitations under Medicaid, Medicare, CHIP, and 

the Department of Veterans Affairs on benefits for persons in custody pending disposition of charges. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equity in Pretrial 

5 Health Coverage Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3050 IS

1 SEC. 2. REMOVAL OF INMATE LIMITATION ON BENEFITS 

2 UNDER MEDICAID, MEDICARE, CHIP, AND 

3 THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) MEDICAID.—The subdivision (A) of section 

5 1905(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)) 

6 that follows paragraph (31) is amended by inserting ‘‘or 

7 in custody pending disposition of charges’’ after ‘‘patient 

8 in a medical institution’’. 

9 (b) MEDICARE.—Section 1862(a)(3) of the Social Se10 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395y(a)(3)) is amended by insert11 ing ‘‘in the case of services furnished to individuals who 

12 are in custody pending disposition of charges,’’ after 

13 ‘‘1880(e),’’. 

14 (c) CHIP.—Section 2110(b)(2)(A) of the Social Se15 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1397jj(b)(2)(A)) is amended by in16 serting ‘‘(except as an individual in custody pending dis17 position of charges)’’ after ‘‘inmate of a public institu18 tion’’. 

19 (d) MODIFICATION OF INMATE LIMITATION ON

20 HEALTH CARE BENEFITS FROM DEPARTMENT OF VET21 ERANS AFFAIRS.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 

22 modify section 17.38(c)(5) of title 38, Code of Federal 

23 Regulations, or successor regulations, to ensure that the 

24 exclusion of veterans who are inmates from eligibility for 

25 health care from the Department of Veterans Affairs 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3050 IS

1 under such section does not apply to veterans who are in 

2 custody pending disposition of charges. 

3 (e) EFFECTIVE DATES.— 

4 (1) IN GENERAL.—The amendments made by 

5 subsections (a), (b), and (c) shall take effect on the 

6 1st day of the 1st calendar quarter that begins more 

7 than 60 days after the date of enactment of this Act 

8 and shall apply to items and services furnished for 

9 periods beginning on or after such date. 

10 (2) DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.— 

11 Subsection (d) shall take effect on the date of enact12 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3103 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.3103

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
   To amend title 18, United States Code, to eliminate the statute of 
limitations for the filing of a civil claim for any person who, while a 
minor, was a victim of a violation of section 1589, 1590, 1591, 2241(c), 
2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of such 
                                 title.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Eliminating Limits to Justice for 
Child Sex Abuse Victims Act of 2022''.
SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.
    Section 2255 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (b) and inserting the following:
    ``(b) Statute of Limitations.--There shall be no time limit for the 
filing of a complaint commencing an action under this section.''.
SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICABILITY.
    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall--
        (1) take effect on the date of enactment of this Act; and
        (2) apply to--
            (A) any claim or action that, as of the date described in 
        paragraph (1), would not have been barred under section 2255(b) 
        of title 18, United States Code, as it read on the day before 
        the date of enactment of this Act; and
            (B) any claim or action arising after the date of enactment 
        of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### Reynolds Street Sewer

(No. 3).

October 7, 1907:

Opinon by

Henderson, J.,

The appellants own property affected by a sewer constructed by the city of Pittsburg on Reynolds street and other intersecting streets as provided for in an ordinance approved October 2, 1900. The present appeal was heard in connection with that of Joseph Woodwell at No. 5, April Term, 1907, in which an opinion has this day been filed, ante, p. 209. The conclusion in that case was adverse to the appellant’s contention. For the reasons there given the assignments in this case are overruled and the decree affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending April 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Sandro Natale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated:  June 15, 2006                    /s/ Sandro Natale
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Sandro Natale
                                         Title:  Interim Chief Executive Officer




                                       42
Order filed December 8, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-01089-CV

____________

ROGUE INVESTMENTS, LIMITED LIABILITY CO., Appellant

V.

TEXAS TARTS, INC., AND KRISTIN TROSTLE, Appellees

On Appeal from the 165th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-52509

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due November 14, 2016. No brief or motion for 

extension of time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before December 29, 2016, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00207-CV

Antonio JIMENEZ and Mary Louise Jimenez,

Appellants

v.

Carlos GONGORA,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-02692

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 7, 2016

DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. We grant the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). Because the motion does not disclose an agreement of the parties regarding the 

assessment of costs, we order all costs assessed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d)

(absent agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against appellant).

PER CURIAM
1

Aerial Inspection Resources,Inc.

4380 SW Macadam Ave.

Suite 515

Portland, OR 97239

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com

U.S. Department of Transportation January 12, 2016

Docket ManagementSystem

1200 New Jersey Ave. S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Amendment to Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. ExemptionNo. 11467

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0261

Dear Sir or Madam:

Aerial Inspection Resources, Inc. (AIR) request amendment to our FAA Exemption No. 11467, 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0261 for the purpose of conducting commercial UAS operations. AIR is 

requesting the authority to operate all aircraft listed on FAA Exemption No. 11467 to include the ability 

to operate with a tethered line attached to the aircraft.

If we can provide any additional information to assist your understanding or review of this 

document, please do not hesitate to contact us at 503-312-9804 or via email at 

Drew.p@aerialinspectionresources.com.

Thank you,

Drew Pairamore

Director ofRegulatory Compliance

Aerial Inspection Resources,Inc.
2