alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

**Plant ID** 00001 **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1** 

### File Name x 04242\04242_Part A.xls x 04242\04242_Part B.xls x 04242\04242_Part C.xls x 04242\04242_Part D.xls x 04242\04242_Part H.xls 04242\Certification Statement Plant ID 04242.pdf 04242\Supplemental Documents\Closure Plan\04242_Gallagher D4-21 Landfill Closure Plan.pdf x 04242\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\04242_Attachment A5-3_Station Water Diagram rev2.pdf x 04242\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\04242_Diagram D3-1.pdf x 04242\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\04242_Gallagher A5-2 Aerial Site Location Map.pdf x 04242\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\04242_Gallagher C2-31.pdf x 04242\04242_Checklist.xls x 04242\04242_Completeness_Checklist.xls

1

### Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

.

### Description

Plant submitted survey file Plant submitted survey file Plant submitted survey file Plant submitted survey file Plant submitted survey file Plant certification statement Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook EPA Completeness Review Checklist**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04242**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** x 04242\04242_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04242\04242_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04242\04242_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04242\04242_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 04242\04242_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

04242\Certification Statement Plant ID 04242.pdf Plant certification statement 04242\Supplemental Documents\Closure Plan\04242_Gallagher D4-21 Landfill Closure Plan.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04242\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\04242_Attachment A5-3_Station Water Diagram rev2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04242\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\04242_Diagram D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04242\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\04242_Gallagher A5-2 Aerial Site Location Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04242\Supplemental Documents\Diagrams\04242_Gallagher C2-31.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04242\04242_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04242\04242_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

_________________________________________ 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 131546(68)(69) Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

HASTINGS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

Plaintiff-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee, 

 SC: 131546 

v COA: 265621 

Oakland CC: 04-056508-CK 

MOSHER, DOLAN, CATALDO & KELLY, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee/ 

Cross-Appellant, 

and 

LISA FEINBLOOM and DAVID FEINBLOOM, 

Defendants. 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion for adjournment of the oral 

argument to a later date is considered and it is DENIED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
1

The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-2504

___________

Dennis Yates, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Western

* District of Missouri.

Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner *

of Social Security, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: October 13, 2009

Filed: October 15, 2009

___________

Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Yates appeals from the district court’s1

 order affirming the final decision

of the Commissioner of Social Security, which denied his application for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income. Yates alleged he became

disabled on February 25, 2002, after falling off a box car at work. After a hearing, an

administrative law judge (ALJ) determined that Yates’s impairments of degenerative

disc disease of the lumbar spine, shoulder pain with history of rotator cuff repair, and
-2-

COPD, were severe but did not equal a listed impairment, either singly or in

combination; his allegations regarding the degree of his pain and limitations were not

fully credible; he had the residual functional capacity (RFC) to perform light work

with some additional limitations; and he could perform his past relevant work (PRW)

as car salesman and service writer. We reject Yates’s arguments for reversal as

follows.

Yates argues that the ALJ disregarded the opinion of his treating physician, Dr.

Eric Sollars, and instead credited the RFC assessment of Dr. David W. Cathcart, a

consulting physician who examined him one time. We hold that the record supports

the ALJ’s decision to credit Dr. Cathcart’s RFC assessment, as he conducted a

thorough physical examination and considered the objective medical evidence in the

record, while Dr. Sollars’s notes do not indicate extensive physical examinations, and

his extreme limitations are not supported by the record. See Wagner v. Astrue, 499

F.3d 842, 849 (8th Cir. 2007) (ALJ may credit other medical evaluations over that of

treating physician when other assessment is supported by better or more thorough

medical evidence, or where treating physician renders inconsistent opinions that

undermine credibility of such opinions). In addition, while Yates argues that the ALJ

failed to consider the functional demands of his PRW as he performed it and compare

it to his RFC, the ALJ elicited testimony from the vocational expert that, given the

RFC the ALJ found supported by the record, Yates could perform his PRW. See 20

C.F.R. § 404.1560(b)(2) (VE may offer evidence concerning demands of claimant’s

PRW, either as claimant actually performed it or as generally performed in national

economy); Wagner, 499 F.3d at 853-54 (ALJ may properly elicit testimony from VE

in evaluating claimant’s capacity to perform PRW, and may look at functional

demands as required by employers in national economy).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

______________________________
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: November 13, 2007
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: November 13, 2007





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT24.4

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESEPRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each ofDamien M. Sullivan, Ross G. Landsbaum and Barry F. Schwartz or any ofthem, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact andagent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, placeand stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with thePANAVISION INC. (the "Corporation")Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 underthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, withoutlimiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in thename and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersignedas a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to theForm 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, ofor in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to filethe same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connectiontherewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities andExchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange orsecurities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-factand agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do andperform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be donein and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as hemight or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all thatsaid attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substituteor substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtuehereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed thesepresents this 30th day of March, 2006.

|  | /S/ EDWARD GREBOW EDWARDGREBOW |
|--|--------------------------------|

----
<PAGE>

Exhibit 10.6



                                    ADDENDUM


         This Addendum amends that certain Employment Agreement dated September
1, 1996 by and between CHARLES C. PIOLA, JR. and NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC., a
Pennsylvania corporation (the "Agreement"), and this Addendum shall be effective
as of May 1, 1998 (the "Effective Date").

         For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.       Paragraph 3 of the Agreement is amended by deleting the text of the
         second paragraph thereof in its entirety and replacing it with the
         following:

         "The Employee shall become a part-time employee as of the Effective
         Date, being required to devote three (3) business days per week to the
         performance of his duties under the Agreement." The Term of the
         Agreement shall remain as set forth in the Agreement.

2.       Paragraph A of Exhibit "A" of the Agreement is amended by providing for
         a Base Salary of $135,000 per annum, commencing on the Effective Date.
         The Base Salary shall be payable in installments, in arrears, in
         accordance with the Company's regular payroll practices, but not less
         often than monthly.

3.       In the event any term or condition of this Addendum is inconsistent
         with any term or condition of the Agreement, the terms of this Addendum
         will control. Except as stated above, all the terms and conditions of
         the Agreement, including all restrictions and covenants, shall remain
         in full force and effect and are incorporated herein by reference as
         though set forth at length.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Addendum to become
effective on the Effective Date.

NCO FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, INC.


By:_________________________________              ______________________________
                                                  Charles C. Piola, Jr.
**O,~IAHOMA fl!pAallll~HI**  01 EIlVIRON>Ul;rAI QU'\IlT BRAD HENRY STEVEN A. THOMPSON 

### OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY , Governor u8Gl1ive Director 

# RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT GWENDOLYN NERO 

### 4901 CHANDLER RD MUSKOGEE. OK 74403

Type of Pee: AIR 

### QUAT ..IIY PERMIT FR"ijS Invoice: AQ 99-113-lY (M-S) Form of Payment: 

# o Cash 

## 0 Check/MO (j) <;:tedit Card 

## 0 Prepaid**Acc:~unt** 

## 0 Electronic Payment 

## 0 Purchase Order 

### Fax # 

### 404-232-4189 

### FaxTo DUSTIN GIVENS' 

### Date Received:**O~/30/2007** Amount Received: ..:,;$5;..,;00;..;;.;.;::..00""""'-

____ Check Number. Logged in By: MESTRADA 

### Receipt Number: .;.,3...... ______ 89_7_44

. 707 NORTH ROBINSON, P.O. BOX 1677, OKLAHOMA (nY, OKLAHOMA 73101·1677 prinlod 00 Illcycilld p;lPIlI WIllI Ally ink 

# o .
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40069 Conference Calendar

OSSIE ROBERT TRADER, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:03-CV-1411

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Ossie Robert Trader, prisoner number 32019-066, was convicted of one charge of aiding and abetting robbery and one charge of using and carrying a firearm during a crime of violence. He was sentenced to serve 248 months in prison and a five-year term of supervised release. Trader filed a purported 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to challenge this sentence. The district court determined that Trader’s purported 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition was best construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D August 18, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 04-40069 -2- and dismissed it. Trader now appeals that dismissal. He argues that his sentence should be vacated because it was imposed in violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. The district court’s findings of fact are reviewed for clear error, and issues of law are reviewed de novo
. Jeffers v. Chandler , 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001). Trader has not shown that the district court erred in construing his pleading as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tolliver v. Dobre , 211 F.3d 876, 877-78 (5th Cir. 2000); Cox v. Warden, Fed. Detention Ctr. , 911 F.2d 1111, 1113 (5th Cir. 1990); Solsona v. Warden , 821 F.2d 1129, 1132 (5th Cir. 1987). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41421

Summary Calendar 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee 

v. 

ADALBERTO VALDEZ-PORRAS, also known as Jose Gabriel HernandezAbundiz, 

Defendant-Appellant 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 7:15-CR-715-1 

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Adalberto ValdezPorras has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Valdez-Porras has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41421 Document: 00513786391 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
No. 15-41421

2 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-41421 Document: 00513786391 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00028-CR

CHARLES SALAS JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 431st District Court

of Denton County (F18-3564-431)

October 29, 2020

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
March 4, 2016 Requested amendment to Section 333 exemption petition Regulatory DocketNo. FAA-2015-4063 Submitted September 21, 2015. Indiana UAS Services, LLC 2216 Osman Greenfield, IN 46140 1_. <;·•:

......! . ·.,, f i**~**

We ask that you considerthe following amendments to the existing exemptionpetition. '-' '· ; I t

1) Addition ofa DJI Phantom 4 to the IndianaUAS Services fleet. This is a stockready to fly system and is comparable to the Blade QX350 included in the existing exemptionpetition. 2) Addition ofa Yuneec Typhoon H to the IndianaUAS Services fleet. This is a stock ready to fly system and is comparable to the Blade QX350 included in the existing exemptionpetition. There has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for the original exemptionpetition. .·. '-

Thank you for your consideration ofthis amendment request. I have been advisedthat it was not necessary to attachthe operations manual for each UAV as long as they were stock equipment and the information was readily available online. Please let me know ifthere is any additional information required. We are looking forward to expanding our operations in a safe and legal manner.

Jack Morton IndianaUAS Services, LLC

r'

·.. :**-~** .l ".
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302




I, Curtis Wade Fox certify that:




1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Electronic Corporate Filing Services, Inc . ;




2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;




3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;




4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:




a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is


made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly


report (the "Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the


Evaluation Date;




5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and




6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.






Date: **May 14, 2003**
By:  Curtis Wade Fox
**/s/ *Curtis Wade Fox*****Title Sole Officer/Director**
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FAMOUS
DAVE'S OF AMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR
THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 3, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FORM 10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           JAN-3-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                JAN-3-1999
<CASH>                                           1,951
<SECURITIES>                                     1,624
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        908
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,307
<PP&E>                                          39,186
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,096
<BONDS>                                          1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           42,809
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        42,809
<OTHER-SE>                                     (9,736)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,169
<SALES>                                         40,761
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,761
<CGS>                                           14,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,758
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (27)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (261)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,709)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,709)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (120)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,829)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.55)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.55)
        

</TABLE>