alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
 STATE OF DELAWARE 
  

			
	CERTIFICATE NO.	  	NUMBER OF SHARES
	 [    ]
	  	[                ]           
 

 JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 Authorized [                ] Shares of 
 Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series Q, Par Value $1.00 Per Share 
 This certifies that Computershare Shareowner Services LLC, as Depositary, is the owner of [                ] shares of
Fixed-to-Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series Q, par value $1.00 per share, of JPMorgan Chase & Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), fully paid and non-assessable, transferable only upon the books of
the Corporation, in person or by attorney, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly authorized officers this [    ] day of [            ],
[        ]. 
  

					
	  
	 		 	  

	[                ]	 		 	[                ]
	[                ]	 		 	[                ]

 The Corporation will furnish, without charge to each stockholder who so requests, the powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights of each class of stock or series thereof and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions of such preferences and/or rights. 







 FOR VALUE RECEIVED,
                     does hereby sell, assign and transfer unto
                                        
(                ) Shares represented by within Certificate, and does hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
                                 as its attorney to transfer such Shares on the books and
records of the Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated:
            , 20    . 
  

					
	In presence of:	 		 	Stockholder:
			
	  
	 		 	  

	Name:	 		 	Name:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
      302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Impart Media Group,
      Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Joseph
      F. Martinez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
            August
                21, 2006
            
            By:
            /s/Joseph
                F. MartinezJoseph
                F. MartinezChief
                Executive Officer andChief
                Financial Officer





This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FILED

September 18, 1997

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

 AT KNOXVILLE

 AUGUST 1997 SESSION

ANTHONY E. SANDERS, ) 

) C.C.A. No. 03C01-9610-CR-00356 

Appellant, )

) Knox County

V. )

) Honorable Ray L. Jenkins, Judge

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) (Post-Conviction)

) 

Appellee. )

FOR THE APPELLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE:

Anthony E. Sanders, Pro Se Charles W. Burson

P.O. Box 2000 Attorney General & Reporter 

Wartburg, TN 37887

Peter M. Coughlan 

Assistant Attorney General

Criminal Justice Division

450 James Robertson Parkway

Nashville, TN 37243-0493

Randall E. Nichols

District Attorney General

City-County Building

Knoxville, TN 37902

OPINION FILED: ___________________

AFFIRMED

PAUL G. SUMMERS,

Judge
1

The appellant relies on an opinion of this Court, Carter v. State, No. 03C01-9509-CC-00270 (Tenn. Crim. App., at

Knoxville, July 11, 1996), to support his assertion that his petitions are not time-barred. We note that the Tennessee

Supreme Court granted permission to appeal in Carter because of the disagreem ent over its holding among different panels

of this Court and has since reversed that ruling, ordering that the 1995 am endm ent to the Post-Conviction Procedure Act did

not revive any claims that had previously been time-barred. Carter v. State, No. 03-S-01-9612-CR-00117 (Tenn., Sept. 8,

1997). 

-2-

O P I N I O N

The appellant, Anthony E. Sanders, pled guilty to aggravated assault and

felony escape in January 1992. In April 1996, he filed two post-conviction relief 

petitions. The trial court, after preliminary consideration, ruled that both petitions

were time-barred. He appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petitions.1 He

alleges that this Court's holding in State v. Hill, No. 01C01-9508-CC-00267

(Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, June 20, 1996) renders the indictment brought

against him for felony escape fatally defective. 

The appellant's most recent conviction became final in 1992. At that time

the law allowed three years to file a petition for post-conviction relief. Tenn.

Code Ann. § 40-30-102 (1990). The appellant's time period for filing his petition

expired in 1995. Therefore, both petitions are barred by the statute of limitations.

We find appellant's pro se brief artfully drafted, and we understand his

allegations. We, however, find no error of law mandating reversal of the trial

court's determinations. Pursuant to Tenn. R. Ct. Crim. App., Rule 20, we

AFFIRM.
-3-

____________________________

PAUL G. SUMMERS, Judge

CONCUR:

_________________________

GARY R. WADE, Judge

_________________________

WILLIAM M. BARKER, Judge
Exhibit 13.2  Section 906 Certification  Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland, a chartered corporation incorporated under the laws of Ireland (Bank of Ireland), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:  The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014 (the Report) of The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Bank of Ireland.   Date: 25 March 2015/s/ ANDREW KEATINGName:
Andrew KeatingTitle:
Group Chief Financial Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00100-CV

Latanya Ann Wilson, Appellant

v.

Ditech Financial, LLC, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY

NO. 3779, THE HONORABLE JOE WEBER, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant Latanya Ann Wilson has filed an emergency motion for temporary 

relief. We grant the motion and temporarily stay enforcement of the trial court’s judgment and 

execution of the writ. See Tex. R. App. P. 29.3. Appellee Ditech Financial, LLC, is ordered to 

file a response to appellant’s motion for emergency relief no later than March 31, 2021.

It is ordered on March 23, 2021.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.04

                         CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE

                         CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

                         FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC.

         FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES HEREBY
CERTIFY THAT:

         1.       In accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the
Delaware General Corporation Law, an amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of this Corporation has been duly adopted by the Corporation.

         2.       Said amendment amends the first paragraph of ARTICLE FOURTH to
the Certificate of Incorporation to read as follows:

         "The Corporation is authorized to issue three classes of shares to be
         designated as Preferred Stock, Class A Common Stock and Class B
         Non-Voting Common Stock. The total number of shares of Preferred Stock
         the Corporation shall have authority to issue shall be 100,000, $.10
         par value, and the total number of shares of Class A Common Stock the
         Corporation shall have the authority to issue shall be 100,000,000,
         $.000006 par value, and the total number of shares of Class B
         Non-Voting Common Stock the Corporation shall have the authority to
         issue shall be 6,200,000, $.000006 par value."

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC. has caused this
Certificate of Amendment to be signed this 25th day of August, 2000.


                                        FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC.


                                        By: /s/ John A. Morelli
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            John A. Morelli
                                            Secretary
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc., (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David L. Osborn, the President of Hudson's Grill International, Inc.,
certify that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

| | (Registrant)

HUDSON'S GRILL INTERNATIONAL, INC.

By: s/s David L. Osborn

David L. Osborn, President

Date: May 11, 2006
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

f\sec\o01.060331
TRTM_TYPE FINAL_STATUS 1947 1948 1949

FRAC ABANDONED LOCATION

FRAC DRY HOLE, TEMPORARILY ABANDONED 219 259 247

FRAC GAS WELL 273 272 258

FRAC INJ, SRV, CO2, STORAGE, WDW, PSEUDO ORIG, MINING BOREHOLE 25 38 24

FRAC JUNKED AND ABANDONED WELL 6 8 3

FRAC LOCATION 1

FRAC MULTIPLE COMPLETION, GAS 10 5 6

FRAC MULTIPLE COMPLETION, OIL 1 2 4

FRAC MULTIPLE COMPLETION, OIL AND GAS 1 2

FRAC OIL WELL 1470 1966 1787

FRAC SUSPENDED

FRAC WELL START 1

REFRAC DRY HOLE, TEMPORARILY ABANDONED

REFRAC GAS WELL

REFRAC MULTIPLE COMPLETION, GAS

REFRAC MULTIPLE COMPLETION, OIL AND GAS

REFRAC OIL WELL
1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966

343 437 519 713 952 1124 1058 943 886 931 869 857 830 700 729 597 527

367 622 758 1265 1222 1599 1881 1912 1846 1794 2012 2175 1965 1635 1817 1910 1741

97 155 69 86 234 378 341 348 293 327 205 244 313 250 299 186 159

8 2 3 3 2 3 4 2 2 5 6 2 6 3 2 2 2

1 1 2 3 1

2 13 23 26 44 50 92 192 197 228 198 217 155 131 157 171 147

20 30 75 165 198 209 295 495 507 626 532 808 699 569 513 367 320

9 7 8 28 49 52 61 73 97 108 118 169 162 149 116 125 86

2324 3678 4441 6060 8757 10691 10878 9753 8264 8240 6201 6079 5777 5788 5726 5841 4919

1 1

1 2 1 1 1 1

1
1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

1

487 467 486 443 429 464 558 663 692 796 1048 1048 938 1492 1948 1313

1432 1322 1871 1924 2124 3202 4226 3724 4518 5061 7013 7937 7630 9077 10690 9277

157 144 111 114 113 91 105 140 172 165 156 211 269 290 366 245

1 1 1 3 1 2 2 1 6 5 6 8 7 6

1

106 93 102 100 79 98 161 105 126 136 196 229 288 463 421 345

207 124 108 70 55 32 34 63 108 107 105 116 130 233 297 168

72 43 46 40 31 25 26 35 44 32 23 35 48 91 121 88

5097 5142 5441 5203 5291 5485 5363 7305 8417 9506 10219 10579 12492 20328 24895 20018

4 7 5 7 5 5 10 11 8 11 6 2 6 6

1
1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999

1 1 1 2

1328 1312 1053 490 431 363 329 379 250 198 214 226 212 265 280 224 221

7264 9255 7420 4602 5126 5668 6892 8706 5744 8256 5867 7781 6437 7359 8658 8553 8030

347 322 317 197 370 370 217 253 220 222 156 107 205 236 265 123 138

4 4 4 1 3 1 2 1 2 6 2 1

201 419 401 308 353 346 310 300 259 330 259 339 230 226 263 287 227

142 241 260 162 132 93 64 47 31 35 23 26 28 27 34 10 5

58 99 74 42 28 30 37 21 10 15 12 24 26 18 14 14 14

20240 22878 18178 7791 8089 5965 5025 5721 4908 4400 4094 3250 3888 4792 5534 3009 2459

3 3 1 2

1 1 5

1 1 1 1 1

1 1 1 1
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

1 1 1 4

260 312 244 251 252 283 365 358 357 171 120

10569 13791 11889 14856 17791 21186 25640 27531 27311 12335 10103

336 261 219 265 215 298 526 700 591 529 607

1 3 2 4 2 4 8 14 6 3

1

328 389 403 471 498 500 604 641 618 372 238

21 19 9 22 14 16 21 14 22 7 12

20 12 6 26 22 17 21 10 11 2 11

4363 4588 3533 4247 5228 6556 7950 7949 10172 6369 10084

1 2 1 4 2 2 2 1

1 2 5 8 8 15 28 96 23 26

2 2 1 1

2 11 21 30 60 66 50 50 58 53 146

1 1 1

1

1 9 8 1 7 9 13 9 9 6 12
MEMORANDUM

To: DOE Office of General Counsel

From: William T. Miller

Date: August 20, 2014

Re: August 20, 2014 meeting with DOE representatives regarding the remand of the DOE Direct Final Rule as it relates to efficiency standards for non

- weatherized gas furnace s

This memorandum provides an overview of the meeting between representatives of the American Public Gas Association (APGA) and of the Department of Energy (DOE). Present for APGA were Dave Schryver and Dan Lapato and its General Counsel, William T. Mi ller of McCarter & English, LLP. Present for DOE were John Cymbalski and Dan Cohen.

The purpose of the meeting was for APGA to discuss several issues regarding the remanded notice

- and

- comment rulemaking resulting from the Court’s order in APGA v. DOE, No. 11

- 1485, issued April 24, 2014. The key points discussed at the meeting were the following:

 The fuel switching survey done by GTI, showing that adoption of a condensing furnace standard for all non

- weatherized gas furnaces would cause substantial fuel sw itching from natural gas to electricity; the survey is publicly available on the web sites of APGA and the American Gas Association.

 The impact analysis done by AGA with the assistance of GTI, showing that the impact of adopting a condensing furnace standa rd for all non

- weatherized gas furnaces , and utilizing the fuel switching survey data noted above, would be to increase overall energy costs, increase source energy usage, and increase CO 2 emissions. This impact analysis was provided to the DOE Representa tives, who indicated they would post it on the DOE web site.

 The importance and reasons for identifying condensing and non

- condensing furnaces as separate product classes under the EPCA and relevant DOE precedents.

 The expected timing of the release of th e Technical Support Document

.

ME1 18787897v.1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6946

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHANEL ELEASE FAISON, a/k/a Chanel Faison Faison,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, 

Chief District Judge. (4:12-cr-00004-RBS-TEM-2; 4:13-cv-00093-

RBS)

Submitted: December 22, 2014 Decided: January 7, 2015

Before DUNCAN and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Chanel Elease Faison, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward 

Bradenham, II, Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Andrew Lamont Creighton, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Newport News, Virginia; Kelly Kathleen Pearson, UNITED 

STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; John Curtis 

Hanley, Kevin Louis Rosenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Chanel Elease Faison seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Faison has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
4

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
SEANPARNELL. GOVERNOR 

41111 AVI A TION A VENUE 

PO Box 196900 

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6900 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

FAX: 

PHONE: 

(907) 269-0730 

(907) 269-0489 

August 4, 2011 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket 1998-3621 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

fSJ) -T50^ ' 

mrr j 

T-; PD 

f T l 

.i>-s: 

—tzr^—' 

o 

This letter is to express support for the continuation of the Essential air Service (EAS) program 

in Alaska and the crucial connection it brings to our remote communities. 

Due to the isolated location of these communities and the complete lack of any road system 

connection, this subsidized air service is their only form of scheduled transportation. The 

communities of Circle and Central depend on scheduled air freight, passenger and mail service 

for basic necessities, routine medical and heahh services, and economic v^elfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are best positioned to comment on 

particular schedules or air carriers and therefore we leave those specific areas for the community 

to comment on. 

I respectfully urge USDOT to support and continue the EAS service at Circle and Central and 

support the carrier selection that applied to provide this service. 

Steven D. Hatter 

Deputy Commissioner - Aviation 

cc: Marc Luiken, Commissioner, DOT&PF 

"Providing for the safe movement of people and goods and the delivery of state services.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40069

Conference Calendar

 

OSSIE ROBERT TRADER,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES SENTENCING COMMISSION,

Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:03-CV-1411

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ossie Robert Trader, prisoner number 32019-066, was

convicted of one charge of aiding and abetting robbery and one

charge of using and carrying a firearm during a crime of

violence. He was sentenced to serve 248 months in prison and a

five-year term of supervised release. Trader filed a purported

28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition to challenge this sentence. The

district court determined that Trader’s purported 28 U.S.C.

§ 2241 petition was best construed as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 04-40069

-2-

and dismissed it. Trader now appeals that dismissal. He argues

that his sentence should be vacated because it was imposed in

violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause.

The district court’s findings of fact are reviewed for clear

error, and issues of law are reviewed de novo. Jeffers v.

Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 830 (5th Cir. 2001). Trader has not

shown that the district court erred in construing his pleading as

a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion that should be dismissed for want of

jurisdiction. See Tolliver v. Dobre, 211 F.3d 876, 877-78 (5th

Cir. 2000); Cox v. Warden, Fed. Detention Ctr., 911 F.2d 1111,

1113 (5th Cir. 1990); Solsona v. Warden, 821 F.2d 1129, 1132 (5th

Cir. 1987). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
ex106.htm




Ex.  10.6


 


Bedrick Employment Understanding


 







 


(i)       Salary. Executive shall receive initial base monthly salary Compensation in the amount of $ 20,000 ("Base Salary").


 


(ii)      Payment. The Base Salary Compensation shall be payable in accordance with the customary payroll practices of the Company, but in no event less frequently than monthly.


 







 


Employee to enter into a comprehensive employment agreement during Q2 2013
Exhibit 31.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
David Simon, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



|Date: March 16, 2007 |  |                                                                                                  
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ David SimonDavid Simon
Chief Executive Officer of Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner

121

---



QuickLinks