alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.2  Section 302 Certification  I, Andrew Keating, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bank of Ireland;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting;  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: 25   March 2015Andrew Keating/s/ ANDREW KEATINGName:
Andrew KeatingTitle:
Group Chief   Financial OfficerBank of Ireland
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 7, 2016

a1130

Order 

Clerk

December 7, 2016

153904

RONALD W. LECH, II,

Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellee,

v SC: 153904

COA: 320028

Livingston CC: 08-024045-CH

HUNTMORE ESTATES

CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION,

Defendant/Counterplaintiff,

and

JACOBSON ORE CREEK LAND 

DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., and SCOTT R.

JACOBSON, d/b/a S. R. JACOBSON

LAND DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.,

Defendants-Appellants.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the 

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the 

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound 

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 22-BG-674

IN RE MICHAEL D. EPHRAIM,

DDN2020-D227

An Inactive Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 433642

BEFORE: Deahl and AliKhan, Associate Judges, and Washington, Senior Judge.

O R D E R

(FILED— November 10, 2022)

On consideration of the certified order from the Commonwealth of Virginia

suspending respondent from the practice of law for 90 days with terms by consent; 

this court’s September 2, 2022, order suspending respondent pending final 

disposition of this proceeding and directing him to show cause why reciprocal 

discipline should not be imposed; respondent’s D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit 

filed on September 28, 2022; and the statement of Disciplinary Counsel; and it 

appearing that respondent has not filed a response, it is

ORDERED that Michael D. Ephraim is hereby suspended from the practice 

of law in the District of Columbia, nunc pro tunc to September 28, 2022, for a period 

of 90 days subject to the probationary terms in Virginia. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 

483, 487-88 (D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor 

of imposition of identical discipline and exceptions to this presumption should be 

rare); In re Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (explaining that a rebuttable 

presumption of identical reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the 

respondent does not participate). 

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

                           AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO TO THE
                JCC HOLDING COMPANY 1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

         This Amendment Number Two (the "Amendment") to the JCC Holding Company
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is made and executed as of the __ day
of _______, 2001, to be effective as of March 29, 2001.

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of JCC Holding Company (the "Company")
has approved an amendment to the Plan, pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Plan, to
grant awards based on the common stock, par value $0.01 per share authorized
pursuant to the Joint Plan of Reorganization Under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code as of February 8, 2001;

         NOW, THERFORE, in accordance with Section 15.1 of the Plan, the Plan is
hereby amended as follows:

         1. Section 3.1(v) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and
following is substituted therefor:

                  3.1(v) "Stock" means the $0.01 par value Common Stock of the
         Company, and any such other securities of the Company as may be
         substituted for Sock pursuant to Article 14.

         2. As modified hereby, the provisions of the Plan, as heretofore
amended, shall remain in full force and effect, and the Plan may be restated, as
amended hereby, in its entirety.

         IN WITNESS WEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the date first above written.



                                         JCC HOLDING COMPANY



                                     By:
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  Paul. D. Debban
                                         Title:   President
Explanatory Comment

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has amended Rules 410, 430, and 1065 

and reconstituted Rule 1064 to update the requirements for the service by publication 

authorized by special order of court for actions to quiet title of subsurface mineral rights. 

Currently, when a plaintiff is unable to serve original process on a defendant pursuant to 

Rules 400 et seq., the Rules of Civil Procedure allow a plaintiff to serve original process 

by publication pursuant to Rule 430 governing service by special court order. For 

service by publication to be allowed, the plaintiff must file a motion with an affidavit 

describing the good faith efforts on the part of the plaintiff to locate the defendant. The 

note to Rule 430 currently provides illustrations of what constitutes a good faith effort to 

locate a defendant. The proposed amendment would expand the sources to be 

searched to include courthouse records and a reasonable internet search. By including 

these sources, the amendment is intended to update the rule to use modern technology 

in an effort to locate a defendant as well as records that are already available at the 

courthouse. In many instances, courthouse records are available on-line as well.

With regard to actions to quiet title of subsurface mineral rights, the amendment 

reconstitutes Rule 1064, which formerly governed service generally for actions to quiet 

title. The reconstituted rule requires a plaintiff, who seeks to serve original process 

pursuant to Rule 430 and obtains actual knowledge of a last known address of the 

defendant outside of the county in which the property at issue is located, to explain in 

the affidavit required by Rule 430(a) the search for the defendant in that locale.

The Court has also amended Rule 1065 governing the content of a complaint in 

actions to quiet title of subsurface mineral rights to require a verified land description in 

the complaint by attaching a summary of the abstract of the mineral title, or the full 

abstract of the mineral title if documents to the property are not available in the 
2

courthouse records, and a statement of acreage involved with a metes and bounds 

description, if available or other description sufficient to identify the subject land.

Cross-references to reconstituted Rule 1064 have been provided in the notes to 

Rule 430(a) governing service by special order of court and Rule 410(c)(1) governing 

service in real property actions in order to aid the practitioner in finding the additional 

requirements set forth in that rule for service by publication in quiet title actions involving 

subsurface mineral rights.

By the Civil Procedural Rules 

Committee

William S. Stickman IV

Chair
# C_2015415EN.01000101.xml

| 15.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 415/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 415/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7847 — EQT Services/TOP-TOY)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 415/01)

On 8 December 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7847. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7847. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LEONARD S. JACKSON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 330 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 27

THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM COMBINED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K FILED AS OF APRIL 9, 
1997.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                       1,764,946
<SECURITIES>                                   202,488
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,779,142
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,864,331
<PP&E>                                       1,150,464
<DEPRECIATION>                                (645,730)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,530,168
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,699,622
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,700
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,649,520
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,530,168
<SALES>                                     11,955,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,955,636
<CGS>                                        1,831,513
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,831,513
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,677,586
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,551,097
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,551,097
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,551,097
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION

(Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350)



The undersigned hereby certifies that
(i) the foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-KSB filed by March 30, 2004 (the Registrant) for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



|                     |  |                                                                    
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 26, 2004 |  | /s/ Ronald Leon Moore                                              
|                     |  | Ronald Leon Moore                                                  
|                     |  | Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer                      
|                     | 
|Date: March 26, 2004 |  | /s/ Ray A. Fleming                                                 
|                     |  | Ray A. Fleming                                                     
|                     |  | Executive Vice President, Comptroller & Principal Financial Officer
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2997 

To prohibit a COVID–19 vaccination requirement for eligibility in nutrition 

programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To prohibit a COVID–19 vaccination requirement for 

eligibility in nutrition programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF COVID–19 VACCINATION RE4 QUIREMENT FOR ELIGIBILITY IN NUTRITION 

5 PROGRAMS. 

6 (a) DEFINITION OF NUTRITION PROGRAM.—In this 

7 section, the term ‘‘nutrition program’’ means— 

8 (1) the special supplemental nutrition program 

9 for women, infants, and children established under 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2997 IS

1 section 17 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 

2 U.S.C. 1786); 

3 (2) the supplemental nutrition assistance pro4 gram established under the Food and Nutrition Act 

5 of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.); 

6 (3) the school breakfast program established 

7 under section 4 of the Child Nutrition Act of 1966 

8 (42 U.S.C. 1773); and 

9 (4) the school lunch program established under 

10 the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act 

11 (42 U.S.C. 1751 et seq.). 

12 (b) PROHIBITION.—In carrying out a nutrition pro13 gram, the Secretary of Agriculture— 

14 (1) may not require a person to have received 

15 a COVID–19 vaccination for eligibility to participate 

16 in the nutrition program; and 

17 (2) shall prohibit a State agency carrying out 

18 the nutrition program from requiring a person to 

19 have received a COVID–19 vaccination for eligibility 

20 to participate in the nutrition program. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2014394EN.01000301.xml

| 8.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 394/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 394/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 November 2014

2014/C 394/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2393 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,89 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4386 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78340 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2125 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2040 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4965 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,705 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,84 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2284 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4350 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8189 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4418 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4168 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6087 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6096 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6056 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 356,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0040 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5876 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6610 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 115,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1467 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,813 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 57,1802 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,745 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1987 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8944 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,3857 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2393

JPY

Japanese yen

142,89

DKK

Danish krone

7,4386

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78340

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2125

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2040

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4965

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,705

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,84

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2284

RON

Romanian leu

4,4350

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8189

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4418

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4168

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6087

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6096

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6056

KRW

South Korean won

1 356,41

ZAR

South African rand

14,0040

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5876

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6610

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 115,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1467

PHP

Philippine peso

55,813

RUB

Russian rouble

57,1802

THB

Thai baht

40,745

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1987

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8944

INR

Indian rupee

76,3857

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary consolidated financial information extracted from
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 and is
qualified in it's entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               Dec-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                  Jan-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    Dec-31-1997
<CASH>                                           34,698,000
<SECURITIES>                                     23,098,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 58,930,000
<PP&E>                                            3,286,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (414,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   61,878,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8,683,000
<BONDS>                                             478,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                             20,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       52,697,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     61,878,000
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 41,182,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (37,668,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (37,668,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (37,668,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (2.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (2.00)
        


</TABLE>