alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

           CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Foamex  L.P.  and  Foamex  Capital
Corporation  on Form 10-K for the period ended January 2, 2005 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, K.
Douglas Ralph,  Executive Vice President and Chief  Financial  Officer of Foamex
L.P. and Foamex Capital Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of Foamex L.P.
     and Foamex Capital Corporation.

Foamex L.P.                                  Foamex Capital Corporation


/s/ K. Douglas Ralph                         /s/ K. Douglas Ralph
----------------------------------           -----------------------------------
K. Douglas Ralph                             K. Douglas Ralph
Executive Vice President and Chief           Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer                            Financial Officer
April 4, 2005
~P~i♦

. . 5 ,

' r

.

~ - 

# IRt i 

# charls ° 

# Comp 

# an y



## ~ ° ~ 

# .ck FACE BRICK MORTAR COLOR GLASS BLOCKS (618) 656-0230 

### Since 9890 PAVING BRICK MASONRY CEM£NT 

### Fax (698) 656-0944 MANUFACTURERS AND DISTRIBUTORS CONCRETE BLOCK 

### www.dchardsbrick.com 

### 234 Springer Avenue STONE VENEER NATURAL STONE 

### ED'WARDSVILLE, IL 62025 TFfIN BRiCK

April 10, 2013



### Alex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency David Rostker, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy Cortney Higgins, U.S. Office of Management and Budget Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: 

### I am writing today as the president of a small brick manufacturing company that has the potential to be significantly impacted by the upcoming MACT standard for major sources in the brick and structural clay 

### processing industry. We are not a formal Small Entity Representative (SER) in the current review panel being conducted under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). We are also not members of the Brick Industry Association (BIA). However, all of our industry is working together with the BIA on this critical rulemaking and they are keeping us apprised of the activities on this ruie. Vlle consider them to be speaking on all industry's behalf as they work with you.
Sincerely,

John Motley President
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: KNA Partners, A Texas Joint Venture v. Lopez Steel Erectors

Appellate case number: 01-16-00686-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-66186

Trial court: 165th District Court of Harris County

The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal in accordance with the parties’ 

settlement agreement and Rule 42.1(a)(2)(B). The parties also ask that we tax costs in 

accordance with the agreement. 

The parties did not file their signed agreement with the clerk, as required by Rule 

42.1(a)(2). To the extent the parties wish to seek voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(2), 

they should file a copy of their signed agreement within 10 days of the date of this order. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually 

Date: November 29, 2016
EXHIBIT 32.1

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of River  Capital  Group,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Howard
Taylor,  Chairman  (Principal  Executive and Financial  Officer) of the Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ HOWARD TAYLOR
---------------------------------------
Howard Taylor President
(Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF 18 U.S.C.

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Cardima, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry D. Michaels, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to § 1350 of Chapter 63 of 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|/s/    BARRY D. MICHAELS                     
|Barry D. Michaels                            
|Interim Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
|March 31, 2005
### R eg u l a t or y Eva l u a tion Doc ket N o. 

### F AA - 20 1 4- 1 1 30 D i rectora te Ide n tifie r : 

### 2 0 15
-NE-04-A D 

### (!

. 1 ' 11111111/AL' clulllg<'\ to IIi<' t •ttfllt's 

### in IIi<' tahiL' 

### /w/111r . . I 'll// IIIII\ I 

### ensw·e the

**tofu/**
**~** upt!ult' 

### acconlingh ·. 1/ 

### tflc : t· do 1101. click ( or TnhJ i111o 1111tf till!/ I 0111 

## 1d th e l'llllll,!!.ed 

### n-11. Es tim a t e d Cos t s: Action C os t s p er Prod u ct (e.g ., aircraft, e ng in e, (e.g . , Inspection , prop e ll e r , app l iance) Work-hours Labor Part s C o s t Total Costs Number of Total Cost rep lacement) (include cost (labor + 

## u .s. fo r U.S . Fleet D o not inclu de on co ne/ilion c osts here acce ss, testing , ( @ $85/ h parts) R eg is t er e d and clo se -up) ou r ) P ro du c t s 

### I n s pe ction and 48 . 0 $1 , 356 

### 72 

### Re torquing

The kn o w n number of produc t s in compl i anc e : Total C o s t s of compliance for 

### U.S. fl e e t : $391 ,392 Co s t s cov e r e d u n der 

### wan·a nt y (if /mown) $ O n -Co nditi o n Co s t s :



## ~ Action Work-hou r s L abor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product ( e .g. , Inspect ion , ( include access, ( @ $85 / hour)

replacement) te s ting , and c loseup)



### S p ec i a l c on s id e r atio n s f o •

· Eco no mi c An a l ys is (U s e this .fi eld to e xplain anylhing in th e Eslimale d Costs f t lble that was assumed or m ight n o t b e obvious. This .fi e ld c an al s o b e used to e.xpla in warranty

**ost ~~:**  

### 7

### Exec u t i ve Ord er 12866: 

### Cou l d the AD be con s id e r ed a "s i g ni ficant regu l atory action"? YES* 

# D

**NO~** 

### *Exp l a nati o n: DOT Reg ul a t ory Po li cies a nd P r oced u res : 

### I s the AD s ig nificant ? YES*0

**NO~** 

### *Exp lanatio n: Regu l atory F le xibil ity Act: 

### Will the AD ha ve a s i g nifi ca nt eco no mic impact o n a s ub s tan tial number of sma ll e ntiti es? Exp lain for either a Yes or No an swer. YESO

**NO~** 

### Explanat i on: In t rasta te Av ia ti o n in A las l <a: 

### Thi s AD cou ld affect intr astate av i at i o n i n Ala s ka. I s it appropr i ate to in clude s pec ifi e req ui reme nts for a irc raft o pe rated in Alaska w he r e aviation might be th e on l y mod e of tran spo rtati on ? YES*0

**NO~** 

### *Exp l anation:



### 8
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed February 08, 2017.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-2284

Lower Tribunal No. 11-23587

________________



### Erick Pacheco

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Daryl E. Trawick

, Judge.

Erick Pacheco

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before WELLS, ROTHENBERG, and LAGOA, JJ.

ROTHENBERG, J.Erick Pacheco (“Pacheco”) was convicted of lewd and lascivious

molestation on a child between the age of twelve and sixteen (Count 1); lewd and

lascivious conduct on a child twelve to sixteen years of age by the defendant who

was eighteen years of age or older (Count 3); and lewd and lascivious battery on a

child less than sixteen years of age (Count 4). 1 The record reflects that the victim

was thirteen or fourteen years old and Pacheco was thirty-eight years old when

Pacheco committed the charged offenses upon the victim.

On direct appeal, this Court affirmed the convictions for the offenses

charged in Counts 1 and 4, but based on the State’s proper confession of error

(double jeopardy grounds), this Court reversed the conviction for the offense

charged in Count 3 with instructions to the trial court to vacate the conviction and

sentence imposed for Count 3, recalculate Pacheco’s sentencing scoresheet, and

resentence Pacheco. Pacheco v. State

, 170 So. 3d 913 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015). The

trial court fully complied with this Court’s directive and substantially reduced

Pacheco’s sentence.

Pacheco now appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for

postconviction relief, in which Pacheco alleged eleven separate grounds of

ineffective assistance of trial counsel, which he contends requires a new trial.

After review of Pacheco’s motion, the State’s lengthy (seventy-seven page) and

1 During trial, the trial court granted a judgment of acquittal as to Count 2 on

double jeopardy grounds.

2very thorough response, the record, the relevant statutes and case law, and the trial

court’s order, we find no error and affirm. The claims raised by Pacheco were

refuted by the record and/or were without merit.

Affirmed.

3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Earth Dragon Resources, Inc. (“Earth Dragon”) because it has not filed a periodic report since it filed its Form 10-Q for the period ending August 31, 2011, filed on October 3, 2012. Earth Dragon's common stock (ticker “EARH”) is quoted on OTC Link (previously “Pink Sheets”) operated by OTC Markets Group, Inc.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of Earth Dragon.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of Earth Dragon is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 31, 2015 through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 14, 2015.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-07674 Filed 3-31-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE CODE 8011-01-P
GLD
- 395 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 13

- 2108

___________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. RODNEY GUY GREENE,

Appellant

____________________________________ On Appeal from the United States Di strict Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (D.C. C riminal No. 88

- cr - 00358

- 001 ) District Judge: Honorable Mary A. McLaughlin

____________________________________ Submitted for Possible Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O. P. 10.6

August 22, 2013 Before: FUENTES, FISHER and VANASKIE , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed: September 4, 2013 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Rodney Guy Greene appeals the District Court’s order denying his “ Nunc Pro
Tunc Petition to Correct an Illegal Sentenc e .” For the reasons below, we will summarily affirm the District Court’s order.2

In 1988, Greene pleaded guilty to bank fraud, possession of stolen mail, and uttering a forged check. He was sentenced to seven years in prison and five years of probation. His many attempts to challenge his conviction and sentence have been unsuccessful. In October 1993, after Greene was arrested on state charges of forgery in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, the District Court revoked his probation and sentenced Greene to fiv e years in prison to be served consecutively to any other term of imprisonment or parole violation sentence previously imposed. Greene appealed, and we determined that the sentence was lawful. See C.A. No. 93

- 1998. In April 2013, Greene filed his Nunc P ro Tunc petition pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(a). The District Court denied the petition without comment, and Greene filed a notice of appeal. Greene contends that Article III(e) of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act mandated a concurrent sente nce for his probation violation. However, the language he quotes permits a concurrent sentence but does not mandate one: “[n]othing in this paragraph shall prevent the imposition of a concurrent sentence if otherwise permitted by law.” Greene’s motion i s meritless. Summary action is appropriate if there is no substantial question presented in the appeal. See Third Circuit LA R 27.4. For the above reasons , we will summarily affirm the District Court’s order. See Third Circuit I.O.P. 10.6.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2823 

To ensure that all fast-tracked reconciliation bills are subject to a committee 

hearing, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself, Mr. BURR, Mr. INHOFE, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. BARRASSO, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CRAPO, Ms. ERNST, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. 

RISCH, Mr. RUBIO, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. HAGERTY, 

Mr. HOEVEN, and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Budget 

A BILL 

To ensure that all fast-tracked reconciliation bills are subject 

to a committee hearing, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Hearing, No Vote 

5 Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2823 IS

1 SEC. 2. COMMITTEE HEARINGS FOR RECONCILIATION 

2 BILLS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 310 of the Congressional 

4 Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 641) is amended by adding 

5 at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(h) COMMITTEE HEARINGS FOR RECONCILIATION

7 BILLS.—It shall not be in order in the Senate to consider 

8 any reconciliation bill or reconciliation resolution, unless— 

9 ‘‘(1) the reconciliation bill or reconciliation res10 olution was— 

11 ‘‘(A) ordered reported to the Senate under 

12 subsection (b)(1) by the committee of the Sen13 ate receiving reconciliation instructions; or 

14 ‘‘(B) reported by the Committee on the 

15 Budget of the Senate under subsection (b)(2) 

16 after receiving recommendations ordered to be 

17 reported to the Committee on the Budget by 1 

18 or more committees of the Senate receiving rec19 onciliation instructions; and 

20 ‘‘(2) each committee that ordered reported the 

21 reconciliation bill or reconciliation resolution or or22 dered recommendations to be reported to the Com23 mittee on the Budget held not less than 1 hearing 

24 regarding any major provision of the reconciliation 

25 bill or reconciliation resolution within the jurisdic26 tion of such committee.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2823 IS

1 (b) WAIVER AND APPEAL.—Section 904 of the Con2 gressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 621 note) is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (c)(1), by inserting ‘‘310(h),’’ 

5 after ‘‘310(d)(2),’’; and 

6 (2) in subsection (d)(2), by inserting ‘‘310(h),’’ 

7 after ‘‘310(d)(2),’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3069 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3069

  To reauthorize the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 
                     1990, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 26, 2021

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Portman, Ms. Stabenow, and Mr. Young) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To reauthorize the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 
                     1990, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife 
Restoration Reauthorization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE GREAT LAKES FISH AND WILDLIFE 
              RESTORATION ACT OF 1990.

    (a) Reports.--Section 1008 of the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife 
Restoration Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 941f) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and not later than December 31, 
                2027,'' after ``2021,'';
                    (B) by striking ``Committee on Resources'' and 
                inserting ``Committee on Natural Resources''; and
                    (C) by inserting ``, with respect to the period 
                covered by the report'' after ``describes''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding paragraph 
        (1), by striking ``2016 through 2020'' and inserting ``2022 
        through 2027''.
    (b) Reauthorization.--Section 1009(a) of the Great Lakes Fish and 
Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 941g(a)) is amended, in the 
matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``2016 through 2021'' and 
inserting ``2022 through 2027''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016069EN.01000201.xml

| 23.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 February 2016

(2016/C 69/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1026 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4620 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78243 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3572 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1008 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4930 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,022 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3646 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4767 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2512 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5322 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5128 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5679 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6521 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5469 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 351,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8486 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1909 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6300 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 824,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6171 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,517 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,4916 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,418 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3755 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9350 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,5948 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1026

JPY

Japanese yen

124,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4620

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78243

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3572

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1008

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4930

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,022

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3646

RON

Romanian leu

4,4767

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2512

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5322

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5128

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5679

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6521

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5469

KRW

South Korean won

1 351,19

ZAR

South African rand

16,8486

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1909

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6300

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 824,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6171

PHP

Philippine peso

52,517

RUB

Russian rouble

83,4916

THB

Thai baht

39,418

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3755

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9350

INR

Indian rupee

75,5948

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey C. Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 16, 2005



/s/    JEFFREY C.
SMITH

Jeffrey C. Smith

Chief Executive Officer



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.