alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2846 

To require Federal agencies to acknowledge, accept, and agree to truthfully 

present, natural immunity pertaining to COVID–19 pursuant to promulgating certain regulations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To require Federal agencies to acknowledge, accept, and 

agree to truthfully present, natural immunity pertaining 

to COVID–19 pursuant to promulgating certain regulations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Natural Immunity Is 

5 Real Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATURAL IMMUNITY TO COVID–19. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Pursuant to any regulation pro8 mulgated by a Federal agency and related to the public 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2846 IS

1 health emergency declared by the Secretary of Health and 

2 Human Services under section 319 of the Public Health 

3 Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to COVID–19, 

4 the applicable agency shall acknowledge, accept, agree to 

5 truthfully present, and incorporate, the consideration of 

6 natural immunity as it pertains to COVID–19 with re7 spect to the individuals subject to the applicable regula8 tions. 

9 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

10 term ‘‘natural immunity’’ means immunity that is natu11 rally existing. 

12 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec13 tion shall be construed to allow for, or authorize, a Federal 

14 vaccination mandate. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Susan H. Reeves, Chief Financial Officer of Peoples First,Inc., certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Peoples First, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4.  The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation

 

----

 

of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial report.

 

 
| Date:   November  12, 2003 |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                      |
|                                      | /s/ Susan H.  Reeves |   |
|                                      | Susan H.  Reeves |
|                                      | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

2

----
***Exhibit 32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q of Montana Mining Corp. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)   This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: August 15, 2011

 

 

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 

----
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB/A for the quarter ending April 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Jean
      Perrotti, Chief Financial Officer and Principle Accounting Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
                December 20, 2007
            
            /s/ Jean
              PerrottiName:
              Jean PerrottiTitle:
                Chief Financial Officer
              And
                Principle Accounting Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Kneifle vs. The State.

The ruling of the court below on an application for a change of venue in a criminal action, and the instructions given to the jury on the trial, are not a part of the record, unless made so by bill of exceptions, and cannot be reviewed ■ by this court.

ERROR to the Circuit Court for *Juneau*County.

The case is stated in the opinion of the court.-

*K. Fox*Cook, for plaintiff in error.

March 12.

*By the*Cowrt,

Cole, J.

This case was before the court on writ of error to the circuit court of Juneau county. The *370plaintiff in error was indicted, with five others, in the circuit court of La Crosse county, for tbe murder of one "William Dennison. He made application for a change of venue, and the cause was sent to Janeau county for trial. On the trial in the circuit court in that county, the jury found him guilty of manslaughter in the second degree. The court therefore sentenced him to confinement at hard labor in the state prison for seven years, the first day in each month during the confinement to be solitary imprisonment. No objection is taken to the form or sufficiency of the indictment. Neither do we perceive any error in the verdict or judgment of the court. It is now alleged that the circuit court of La Crosse county first improperly refused to change the venue on application being made therefor by the plaintiff in error, and that when the venue was changed it was improperly changed as to the defendants who made no application for such change. It is further alleged, that the circuit court of Juneau county committed various errors upon the trial, and gave improper instructions to the jury. But there is an insuperable difficulty to our considering these various objections, which is, that there is no bill of exceptions in the case, and these questions are not therefore before us. "We can only consider matters and errors apparent upon the record. The indictment charges the offense in apt and proper words, and the verdict and judgment axe legal and sufficient. If any errors occurred on the trial, exceptions should have been taken, and a bill of exceptions prepared embracing those matters, so that this court could review them. We must therefore affirm the judgment.

The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: 

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-07748 Filed 4-1-15; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
The HONORABLE SCOTT O. WRIGHT, United States District Judge for the 1 Weste rnDistrict of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of th e HONORABLE WILLIAM A. KNOX, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3105

___________ Arizona Hall, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the George Lombardi; Cranston Mitchell; * Western District of Missouri. R. Dale Riley; Myrna E. Trickey; John * Bell; Ernest Cowles; Pat Smith; Jo * [UNPUBLISHED] Ellen Jones, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 7, 1998 Filed: October 16, 1998

___________ Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Missouri inmate Arizona Hall appeals the district court & s order dismissing his 1 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 for failure to state a claim. In his-2-

complaint, Hall alleged defendants improperly computed his conditional release date, thereby causing him to suffer various deprivations of his constitutional rights. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the judgment of the district court is correct and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court & s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a). We deny Hall & s motions on appeal as moot. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# CE2004088EN.01027701.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/277 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/277

---

(2004/C 88 E/0281)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1039/04

by Daniel Cohn-Bendit (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(29 March 2004)

Subject:   Commissioner Reding standing in the European elections

Subject:

Commissioner Reding will be standing in the European election, without taking any leave, for the duration of her electoral campaign, from her current duties, as agreed with former Employment Commissioner Mrs Diamontopolou.

Why is there no general rule that applies during electoral campaigns within the College of Commissioners? Is it because the Commission does not think it appropriate to draw up an unambiguous rule within its college because it wishes to avoid conflicts of interest between the Commissioners' duties and the candidates' interests?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(28 April 2004)

(28 April 2004)

Current practice within the Commission requires Members to give the President sufficient notice of their intention of standing for elective office and of their intended level of participation in the electoral campaign. If their intention is to play an active part in the election campaign, they must withdraw from the work of the Commission for the duration of the campaign (1). This avoids the risk of conflicts of interest and ensures that the Member of the Commission concerned can speak and act as freely as possible, while respecting the principle of collective action by the Commission.

1

As regards the situation of Members of the Commission who appear on an electoral list but do not participate actively in the electoral campaign, Members must decide, in consultation with the President, and taking account of the particular circumstances of the case, whether this is compatible with their participation in the work of the Commission.

Since Ms Reding agreed with the President not to participate actively in the election campaign, it was felt that her standing for office would not interfere with her availability to work with the Commission and that there would be no conflict of interests. Her undertaking means that there is no reason why Ms Reding should not continue her duties at the Commission during the period in question.

This conclusion is compatible with the Code of Conduct for Members of the Commission, which provides that Members of the Commission may be active members of political parties provided that such activities do not affect their availability to carry out their duties as Members of the Commission.

The future President of the Commission will be able to decide whether, in light of experience, is necessary to lay down general rules governing election campaigns by Members of the Commission.

---

(1)  See answers to Written Questions No 124/68, OJ C 83, 23.8.1968, No 858/76, OJ C 70, 21.3.1977 and No 2752/94, OJ C 88, 10.4.1995.

1

---
Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

June 11, 2020
Data Sources

June 11, 2020

June 2020 Ag Yield Sample Sizes
United States Winter Wheat Condition

Percent Rated Good to Excellent

June 11, 2020

Percent
United States Winter Wheat Progress

Percent Headed

June 11, 2020

Percent
June 2020 Winter Wheat

Acreage, Yield, and Production

June 11, 2020
June 2020 Winter Wheat Yield

United States

June 11, 2020

Bushels per Acre
June 2020 Winter Wheat Yield

Bushels and Percent Change from Previous Month

June 11, 2020
June 2020 Winter Wheat Objective Yield

Percent of Samples Processed in the Lab

June 11, 2020

Percent
June 2020 Winter Wheat Objective Yield

Heads per Square Foot and Yield for 10 State Region

June 11, 2020

Heads per Square Foot Bushels per Acre
June 2020 Winter Wheat Production

United States

June 11, 2020

Billion Bushels
June 2020 Winter Wheat Production

United States, by Class

June 11, 2020
2020 U.S. Winter Wheat Production

Industry Expectations vs NASS

June 11, 2020
June 11, 2020

June 2020 Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts

Production
June 11, 2020

June 2020 Maple Syrup

Production
June 2020 Citrus

Utilized Production

June 11, 2020
2019 Corn

Acreage, Yield, and Production

June 11, 2020
December 2019 Corn

Stocks

June 11, 2020
2019 Soybeans

Acreage, Yield, and Production

June 11, 2020
December 2019 Soybeans

Stocks

June 11, 2020
Upcoming Reports

June 11, 2020

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/index.php
#StatChat

June 11, 2020
All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

202-720-2127

800-727-9540

nass@usda.gov
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.9


                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Eric W. Golden, Bobby G. Jenkins and Barry F.
Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the PANAVISION INC. (the
"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and
on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or
officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any
instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the
Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of
attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable
securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  undersigned  has signed these
presents this 22nd day of March, 2004.



                                                      /S/ ROBERT S. WIESENTHAL
                                                     -------------------------
                                                     ROBERT S. WIESENTHAL
# CA2015179EN.01000101.xml

| 2.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 179/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AD/277/14

ADMINISTRATORS (AD 5) IN THE FIELD OF AUDIT

(2015/C 179 A/01)

| BOULANGER | Joël |
| --- | --- |
| BRAZ | Paulo |
| BUGARELLA | Davide |
| CIABATTI | Ingrid |
| COBO BENITO | Silvia |
| COLAVITA | Antonella |
| DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ | Maria Jesús |
| DONGIOVANNI | Leonardo |
| FALCINELLI | Alessandra |
| FARA | Guido |
| GERLI | Letizia |
| GIRETTI | Mario |
| HANSSENS | Kristof |
| HIRVONEN | Tuija |
| IACONISI | Mirko |
| JÄÄSKELÄINEN | Tuomo Markus |
| KILJUNEN | Aino |
| KONSTANTOPOULOS | Michail |
| LINTU | Dan Andrei |
| MANOILOV | Gueorgui |
| MARCOS FIGUERUELO | Ángela |
| MARTIN PÉREZ | Fernando |
| MIÑANO SICILIA | Alejandro |
| MOLDOVAN | Felix Hadrian |
| MORENO RODRIGUEZ | Antonio |
| MÜLLER-HELLMANN | Julia |
| NEGREAN | Mirela Loredana |
| POSTI | Cesare |
| RIVOIRA | Marzia |
| ROCES FERNÁNDEZ | Pelayo |
| SANDU | Raluca Elena |
| SANTINELLI | Valentina |
| STASIA | Antonella |
| SUCILA | Cristina |
| VARANDA RIBEIRO | Ricardo Antonio |
| VERBAL | Dana Gabriela |
| ZAGORDO | Michele |
| ZOIA BOLZONELLO | Francesco |

BOULANGER

Joël

BRAZ

Paulo

BUGARELLA

Davide

CIABATTI

Ingrid

COBO BENITO

Silvia

COLAVITA

Antonella

DOMINGUEZ MARTINEZ

Maria Jesús

DONGIOVANNI

Leonardo

FALCINELLI

Alessandra

FARA

Guido

GERLI

Letizia

GIRETTI

Mario

HANSSENS

Kristof

HIRVONEN

Tuija

IACONISI

Mirko

JÄÄSKELÄINEN

Tuomo Markus

KILJUNEN

Aino

KONSTANTOPOULOS

Michail

LINTU

Dan Andrei

MANOILOV

Gueorgui

MARCOS FIGUERUELO

Ángela

MARTIN PÉREZ

Fernando

MIÑANO SICILIA

Alejandro

MOLDOVAN

Felix Hadrian

MORENO RODRIGUEZ

Antonio

MÜLLER-HELLMANN

Julia

NEGREAN

Mirela Loredana

POSTI

Cesare

RIVOIRA

Marzia

ROCES FERNÁNDEZ

Pelayo

SANDU

Raluca Elena

SANTINELLI

Valentina

STASIA

Antonella

SUCILA

Cristina

VARANDA RIBEIRO

Ricardo Antonio

VERBAL

Dana Gabriela

ZAGORDO

Michele

ZOIA BOLZONELLO

Francesco

The reserve list will be valid until 18 April 2016.

18 April 2016

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
Order entered December 1, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00552-CR

ELIAS MUNOZ GUTIERREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1512656-L

ORDER

Appellant has informed the Court that he wishes to file a pro se response to the Anders

brief filed by appellate counsel. Accordingly, this is the ORDER of the Court:

We ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to provide appellate counsel Tara 

Cunningham with a paper copy of the clerk’s record that is redacted to delete the addresses, dates 

of birth, and social security numbers of individuals other than appellant on all documents on 

which they appear. 

We ORDER Victoria Franklin, official court reporter of the Criminal District Court No. 

5, to provide Tara Cunningham with a paper copy of the reporter’s record, redacted to delete the 

addresses, dates of birth, and social security numbers of individuals other than appellant on all 

documents on which they appear.
 We ORDER counsel Tara Cunningham to send appellant copies of the clerk’s and 

reporter’s records, as redacted in accordance with this order, and to provide this Court, within 

FORTY DAYS of the date of this order, with written verification that the record has been sent to 

appellant.

Appellant’s pro se response is due by January 17, 2016.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Carter Thompson, 

Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 5; Victoria Franklin, Official Court Reporter, 

Criminal District Court No. 5; Felicia Pitre, Dallas County District Clerk; Tara Cunningham; and 

the Dallas County District Attorney’s Office.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send a copy of this order, by first class mail, to Elias Munoz 

Gutierrez.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE