alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016100EN.01000301.xml

| 16.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/3

---

Special Report No 5/2016

‘Has the Commission ensured effective implementation of the Services Directive?’

(2016/C 100/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 5/2016 ‘Has the Commission ensured effective implementation of the Services Directive?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
NO. 07-03-0200-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL C

	AUGUST 4, 2003

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF DAE GENARO LEE GRADY QUINTANILLA, 

	A MINOR CHILD

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 320TH DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

	NO. 65,940-D; HON. DON EMERSON, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and QUINN and REAVIS, JJ.

	Appellant Kristeen Quintanilla (Kristeen) filed a notice of appeal on May 7, 2003.  However, she did not pay the $125 filing fee required from appellants pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5.  Nor did she file an affidavit pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20, which may have relieved her of her duty to pay the fee.  By letter from this Court dated May 9, 2003, we informed Kristeen that "[f]ailure to pay the filing fee may result in a dismissal."  Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F. F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.--Amarillo 1998, pet. ref'd).  To date, the filing fee of $125 has not been paid.  Consequently, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c).  Finally, our having disposed of the case as we do renders moot the request by the Potter County Clerk’s office for an extension of time to file the clerk’s record.

							Per Curiam
TELEPHONE CONTACT SUMMARY

F ROM : Richard Marinshaw

RTI International

D ATE OF CONTACT : July 19 and 25 , 2007

ORGANIZATION CONTACTED:

South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control

2 600 Bull Street

Columbia, SC 29201

P ERSON CONTACTED :

James Myers

, Environmental Engineer ing Associate

(803) 898

- 4621

PURPOSE OF CONTACT:

For in formation on the emissions from the chromium electroplating operations at the

AVM, Inc. facility in Marion, South Carolina.

SUMMARY OF CONTACT:

The South Caroli na Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC) was

contacted to request emissions estimates and other information on the chromium

electroplating operations at the AVM, Inc. plant in Marion, South Carolina. Mr. Myers

stated that the most recen t emission estimate submitted by the facility to SC D H EC with

their permit application, dated November 26, 2006, indicated th e potential to emit

hexavalent chromium for their decorative chromium electroplating operations w as

0.00088 tons per year (1.76 pou nds per year). Emissions from the chromium

electroplating tanks are controlled with a scrubber and mist eliminator.

When asked if SC DHEC could provide copies of the emissions estimate and other

documents for the facility, Mr. Myers indicated that we wou ld have to submit a Freedom

of Information Act (FOIA) request for the information. RTI submitted a FOIA request

on July 23, 2007.
EXHIBIT 31.2







CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION





I, Shelly Schaffer, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Form 10-Q/A of Support.com, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;








Date: December 19, 2012

By:
/s/ SHELLY SCHAFFERShelly SchafferChief Financial Officer and Executive

Vice

President of Finance

and Administration
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2713 

To amend the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability 

Act of 2015 to require that any trade agreement subject to expedited 

procedures under that Act contain certain requirements relating to the 

origination of goods in nonmarket economy countries. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 13, 2021 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. BROWN, and Ms. WARREN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and 

Accountability Act of 2015 to require that any trade 

agreement subject to expedited procedures under that 

Act contain certain requirements relating to the origination of goods in nonmarket economy countries. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Market Economy 

5 Sourcing Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2713 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON TRADE AUTHORITIES PROCEDURES 

2 RELATING TO REQUIREMENTS ON CONTENT 

3 OF GOODS FROM NONMARKET ECONOMY 

4 COUNTRIES. 

5 Section 106(b) of the Bipartisan Congressional Trade 

6 Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (19 U.S.C. 

7 4205(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(7) LIMITATIONS ON PROCEDURES RELATING

9 TO ORIGINATION OF CONTENT OF GOODS FROM NON10 MARKET ECONOMY COUNTRIES.— 

11 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The trade authorities 

12 procedures shall not apply to an implementing 

13 bill submitted with respect to a trade agreement 

14 or trade agreements entered into under section 

15 103(b) unless the rules of origin requirements 

16 under such agreement or agreements— 

17 ‘‘(i) with respect to rules of origin 

18 based on value content of a good, require 

19 that, of the content of a good qualifying 

20 for preferential treatment under the agree21 ment or agreements that does not originate 

22 (as specified in those rules) in a country 

23 that is party to the agreement or agree24 ments— 

25 ‘‘(I) during the 5-year period fol26 lowing the entry into force of the 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2713 IS

1 agreement or agreements, not more 

2 than 20 percent of that content may 

3 originate in a nonmarket economy 

4 country; and 

5 ‘‘(II) after the period specified in 

6 subclause (I), not more than 10 per7 cent of that content may originate in 

8 a nonmarket economy country; and 

9 ‘‘(ii) with respect to rules of origin 

10 that are not based on value content of a 

11 good, are consistent with the requirements 

12 under clause (i) based on processing re13 quirements or tariff shifts as opposed to 

14 value content. 

15 ‘‘(B) NONMARKET ECONOMY COUNTRY DE16 FINED.—In this paragraph, the term ‘non17 market economy country’ has the meaning 

18 given that term in section 771(18) of the Tariff 

19 Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1677(18)).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Yearly Certificateholders' Statement (K)
                         
           CAPITOL REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN TRUST 1996-1
                         
     Under subsection 5.3(b) of the Pooling and Servicing  Agreement dated as of
     September  1, 1996 by and between  Chevy Chase  Bank,  F.S.B.,  a federally
     chartered savings bank, as Transferor and Servicer, and the Chase Manhattan
     Bank, as Trustee and Custodial  Agent  (hereinafter  as such  agreement may
     have been, or may from time to time be, amended,  supplemented or otherwise
     modified, the Pooling and Servicing Agreement"),  Chevy Chase Bank, F.S.B.,
     as the  Servicer,  is required  to prepare  certain  information  each year
     regarding current  distributions on the Certificates and the performance of
     the  Capitol  Revolving  Home Loan Trust  1996-1 (the  "Trust")  during the
     related  Collection Period. The information that is required to be prepared
     with respect to the distribution to Holders (the  "Certificateholders")  of
     the Certificates for the calendar year ended December 31, 1998 is set forth
     below.  Certain of the information is presented on the basis of an original
     principal amount of $1,000 per Certificate, as the case may be. Capitalized
     terms used and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned them
     in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.
                         
A.   Information Regarding the Current Year Distribution to Certificateholders
     (Per $1,000 Original Principal Amount of a Certificate).
                         
                         
     1.   The amount, if any, of principal included in
          such distribution, separately stating the    
          components thereof (including the portion    
          thereof attributable to collections in respect of
          the Mortgage Loans)...............................     $294.38
                         
     2.   The amount of Investor Certificate Interest  included in
            such distribution, the related Investor Certificate
            Rate and the portion        
          thereof attributable to collections in  
          respect of the Mortgage Loans.....................     $38.88
                         
                         
                         
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Certificate 
to be duly executed this 25th day of March, 1999  
              
                              CHEVY CHASE BANK, F.S.B.
                              as Servicer         
                         
                                  By:   Carol Thomas
                                        ------------------
                                        Carol Thomas   
                                        Vice President
                                        Carol Thomas   
                                        Vice President
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending April 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Sandro
Natale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.       the
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Dated:
      May 27, 2010
              /s/
      Sandro NataleName:  Sandro
      NataleTitle:
      President  & Chief Executive
  Officer
### UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION VII 901 NORTH 5TH STREET KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101 

### OCI 'i. 

### 7 2010

Mr. James Kavanaugh Director Missouri Department ofNatural Resources Air Pollution Control Program P.O. Box 176 Jefferson City, Missouri 65102-0176 Dear Mr. Kavanaugh: OFFICE OF REGIONAL ADMINISTRATOR

I am pleased to approve the 2010 Missouri Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Plan and Five-yearAirMonitoring Network Assessment submittedto EPA R7 by the Missouri Department ofNatural Resources on June 28, 2010. The plans were reviewed and found to be in accordance with the provisions of40 CFR Part 58. Your air monitoring staffis to be commended for its hard work and attention to detail while completing these plans. Your actions and dedication directly support the EPA's strategic air quality goals by maintaining a well designed monitoring network.**Sincer**..elY' 

### " 

# ''Ie'
Karl Brooks Regional Administrator

cc: Ronald Hammerschmidt, ENSV

### RECYCLE~ PIlPER CONTAINS RECYCLED AllERS
# C_2016058EN.01000101.xml

| 13.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7926 — Goldman Sachs/Northgate)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 58/01)

On 3 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7926. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7926. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q.  Please refer to those financial
statements contained herein.  This summary financial data schedule is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
#### Ludrof v. Bethlehem Contracting Company

*467
      *Donald Corriere,*for plaintiff.

*Robert E. Donatello,*for defendants.

December 7, 1977

GRIFO, *J.,*

This matter is before us on defendants’ preliminary objections in the form of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a cause of action and a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The issues were combined for briefing and will be so dealt with here.

According to the complaint, plaintiff’s employment with defendants was terminated on or about April 1, 1977. Thereafter, plaintiff and defendants entered into an oral agreement concerning the termination of plaintiff’s employment. One term of the agreement was that defendants would provide plaintiff with a letter of recommendation for his future employers. The terms of the letter were agreed upon by the parties. Plaintiff avers that he has fulfilled all his obligations under the agreement; however, despite requests, defendants have failed to provide such a letter. Wherefore, plaintiff requests that this court order defendants specifically to comply with the agreement.

In their brief in support of preliminary objections, defendants cite cases for the propositions that a court of equity will not specifically enforce a contract for personal services, and that “seniority rights and other benefits” are not independent rights, but are rights which terminate with the cessation of employment. Defendants equate *468plaintiff’s demand for a letter of recommendation with a demand for reinstatement, or for personal services, and conclude, on the above cases, that the court should not enforce the demand. The proper remedy, it is asserted, is for damages at law, and therefore, this court lacks jurisdiction.

Simply stated, we are not convinced that the agreement is one for personal services within the traditional meaning of that term. It is not a contract, the performance of which would involve lengthy service, difficulty of enforcement, close personal association of the parties, or any other of the factors which impede the enforcement of “personal service” contracts (see 5A Corbin on Contracts §1204); nor is the right here sought to be enforced one which depends on the existence of the employment relationship for its vitality. Rather, it is, according to the pleadings, the subject of a separate and distinct agreement between the parties, made subsequent to the termination of plaintiff’s employment.

Further, we are of the opinion that money damages would not adequately compensate plaintiff for defendants’ failure to perform. Money damages would not help secure plaintiff’s future employment, nor would they place him in the position he would have occupied had there been no breach.

Wherefore, we feel that there is no adequate remedy at law, and we enter the following

ORDER OF COURT

And now, to wit, December 7, 1977, defendants’ preliminary objections are denied and dismissed.

Defendants are given leave to file an answer within 20 days of the date of this order.
# C_2014108EN.01000101.xml

| 10.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 April 2014

2014/C 108/01

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3794 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,73 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4660 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82375 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9953 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2184 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2195 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,406 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,20 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1708 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4629 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9185 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4727 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5082 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6950 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5890 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7251 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 432,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4216 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5523 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6325 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 656,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4520 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,534 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,2924 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,520 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0459 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0025 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,9502 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3794

JPY

Japanese yen

140,73

DKK

Danish krone

7,4660

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82375

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9953

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2184

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2195

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,406

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,20

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1708

RON

Romanian leu

4,4629

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9185

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4727

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5082

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6950

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5890

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7251

KRW

South Korean won

1 432,26

ZAR

South African rand

14,4216

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5523

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6325

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 656,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4520

PHP

Philippine peso

61,534

RUB

Russian rouble

49,2924

THB

Thai baht

44,520

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0459

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0025

INR

Indian rupee

82,9502

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### Martin , Michae l (OST) From : Ranel l Fencha k <ranellfenchak@flyjohnstownairport.com > Sent : Thursday , Apri l 12 , 201 2 2:0 3 P M To : Devany , Denni s (OST) ; Martin , Michae l (OST ) Cc : cpillar@embarqnnail.com ; 'Ric h Weaver' ; 'Willia m C . Polacek ' Subject : Silve rAinway s Importance : Hig h Mr . DeVan y an dMr . Martin , C O 

## ^ po o I woul dlike t o expres s ou r interes t an dsuppor t

o f Silver Airway s servin g a s th e carrie r fo r John'S^awrt^ dAltoon a Markets . "" " W e hav e spok e t o Micke y Bowma nan dh e ha s give nu s a ninformativ e presentatio no f SUve r Airway s an dar e i n continu e correspondenc e wit hthe mregardin g question s an didea s o f ho w the y ar e abl e t o bes t serv e ou r communities . W e hop e t o se e Silver

b e place di nou r

marke t fo r continue dai r

service . RaNel l Fenchak Manage r Phone : 814-536-000 2 Fax : 814-539-578 7 ranellfenchak@flyjohnstownairport.co m
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

M arch 10 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk March 10 , 2017

15 4836 ( 70 )

In re ESTATE OF LINDA ROBERDEAUX.

_______________________________________

DENNIS ROBERDEAUX, SR., Personal

Representative of the ESTATE OF LINDA

ROBERDEAUX

Plaintiff

- Appell ee

, MSC: 154836

v COA: 323802

Washtenaw CC: 13

- 000675

- NH

EVANGELICAL HOMES OF MICHIGAN

, d /b/a

EVANGELICAL HOME

- SALINE and

MICHIGAN SPORTS MEDICINE &

ORTHOPEDIC CENTER,

Defendants,

and

WASHTENAW MEDICINE

, P.C., d /b/a

WASHTENAW INTERNAL MEDICINE

ASSOCIATES , and CHERYL A. HUCKJNS, M

. D

. , Defendants

- Appellees,

and

MARK A. KELLEY, M.D.,

Defendant

- Appellant.

___________________________________________ /

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of plaintiff

- appellee to extend the time

for filing its answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

submitted on March 7, 2017, is accepted for filing.