alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Simon Property Group, L.P. (the "Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/ David SimonDavid Simon
Chief Executive Officer,
Simon Property Group, Inc.
March 30, 2004                 |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Stephen E. SterrettStephen E. Sterrett
Chief Financial Officer,
Simon Property Group, Inc.
March 30, 2004 |  | 

111

---

QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-7807

THERL TAYLOR,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CATHERINE AMASON, SCDC Mailroom Supervisor; MISHA MICHELLE, 

Mailroom Attendant; WAYNE THOMPSON, SCDC Lieutenant; A. 

SELLARS, SCDC Disciplinary Hearing Officer; D. SEWARD, SCDC 

Major; JEANNE MCKAY, SCDC Associate Warden; JANE DOES, 

Employee; JANE CHISUM, CO; JOHN EVRY, CO; CHRIS FLORIAN, 

SCDC Office of General Counsel Attorney; WILLIAM BYERS, SCDC 

Director,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JON DOES, Inmate; SCDC,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-03449-RMG)

Submitted: April 21, 2016 Decided: April 25, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Therl Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Thomas Lowndes 

Pope, Jayme Leigh Shy, Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY, POPE & LANEY,

LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Therl Taylor appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint, its order denying his 

Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, and the magistrate judge’s order 

denying as moot his discovery motion. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Amason, No. 

2:13-cv-03449-RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2015; Oct. 14, 2015; Nov. 

18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 25, 2019. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 25, 2019 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A20I0041. DIANE BUCKNER-WEBB et al. v. THE STATE. Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 13SC117954
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of --

Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. 

Under Contract No. DAAA09-02-D-0007 et al. 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

) 

) 

) ASBCA Nos. 58518, 59005 

) 

) 

Jason N. Workmaster, Esq. 

Patrick J. Stanton, Esq. 

Covington & Burling LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Douglas R. Jacobson, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Bloomington, MN 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute which is the subject of the appeals having been settled, the appeals 

are hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the 

settlement is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeals must be 

filed not later than 7 March 2017. 

Dated: 5 December 2016 

Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 58518, 59005, Appeals of Kellogg 

Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 06 5

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Soybeans 2022

Production by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Bushels

Not Estimated

< 250,000

250,000 - 749,999

750,000 - 1,999,999

2,000,000 - 3,999,999

4,000,000 - 7,999,999

8,000,000 +
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capella Education Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Lois M. Martin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lois M. Martin                               
|Lois M. Martin                                   
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 1, 2007                                 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         112,005
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  604,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    33,626
<INVENTORY>                                    660,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,557,790
<PP&E>                                         311,641
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,019,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,054,207
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,000
<COMMON>                                         4,273
<OTHER-SE>                                     830,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,019,124
<SALES>                                      5,618,892
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,618,892
<CGS>                                        2,816,523
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,321,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                97,088
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,272
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              57,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                200,112
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (18,103)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            218,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   218,215
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




Board of
Directors


NeoMedia
Technologies, Inc.




We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration
Statements (File Nos. 333-110189 and 333-109778) of our report dated March 26,
2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of NeoMedia Technologies,
Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, which appears in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/
Kingery & Crouse, P.A.


Tampa,
Florida


March 26,
2010
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-4034

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JERRELL MARKES BROADIE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Senior

District Judge. (3:15-cr-00115-JRS-1)

Submitted: September 21, 2016 Decided: December 2, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Geremy C. Kamens, Federal Public Defender, Patrick L. Bryant, 

Appellate Attorney, Elizabeth W. Hanes, Assistant Federal Public 

Defender, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente, 

United States Attorney, Angela Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerell Markes Broadie appeals the 84-month sentence imposed 

upon his guilty plea to theft of firearms from a federally 

licensed firearms dealer, 18 U.S.C. § 922(u) (2012). Broadie 

claims, first, that the district court improperly assigned a 

base offense level of 20 under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual

(USSG) § 2K2.1(a)(4)(B)(i)(I) (2014), based upon its findings

that the offense involved a semiautomatic weapon capable of 

accepting a large capacity magazine and that Broadie qualified 

as a “prohibited person.” Second, Broadie claims that the 

district court erred in applying the four-level enhancement 

under USSG § 2K2.1(b)(5) for engaging in firearms trafficking. 

We review a sentence for reasonableness, applying an abuseof-discretion standard. Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 

(2007); United States v. Howard, 773 F.3d 519, 527-28 (4th Cir. 

2014). We review the sentencing court’s factual findings for 

clear error. United States v. Flores-Alvarado, 779 F.3d 250, 

254 (4th Cir. 2015). With these standards in mind, we have 

reviewed the record before the court and the parties’ briefs and 

find no clear error and no abuse of discretion by the district 

court in imposing Broadie’s sentence. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
T. O., A Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1570

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Henry E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Section
      302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of River Capital Group, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Howard Taylor, Chairman (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.








Date:
      November 14 ,
      2007





/s/
      Howard Taylor


_________________________________________


Howard
      Taylor President


(Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2208
YVONNE E. FLETCHER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHERATON HOTEL BWIN ASSOCIATION LIMITED; SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-97- 751-MJG) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 16, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Yvonne E. Fletcher, Appellant Pro Se. George McKnight Church, Christine Tryphena Altemus, CHURCH & HOUFF, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland; Edward J. Longosz, II, Susan Hall Snively, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, McLean, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fletcher v. Sheraton Hotel BWIN Assoc., Ltd. , No. CA-97-751-MJG (D. Md. July 22, 1997). We denyAppellee's motion for sanctions against Appellant. We further dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12.1  Section 302 Certification  I, Richie Boucher, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bank of Ireland;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting;  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: 27 March 2013Richie Boucher/s/Richie BoucherName:
Richie BoucherTitle:
Group Chief ExecutiveBank of Ireland
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ron Lizée, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Acrongenomics Inc.
      for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Acrongenomics Inc.                                                                 

June 4, 2012

| | /s/ Ron Lizée                                                       
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Ron Lizée                                                           
| | Chief Financial Officer and Director                                
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
      Accounting Officer)

---
***Exhibit******32***

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERAND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report on Form 10-Qof Montana Mining Corp. for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to        §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:          

|  | (1)      | This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2)      | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrantat the endof the period covered by this report and resultsof operations of the registrantfor the period covered by this report. |
|--|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: August 4, 2009

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrantfor the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be        incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.                  A signed original of this written statement required by §906 hasbeen provided to the registrantand will be retained by the registrantand furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

26