alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.21

STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350

I, Ken Owyang, the chief financial officer of SupportSoft, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of
title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



|(i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 10, 2006



/s/ KEN OWYANGKen OwyangChief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Finance and Administration


A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to
SupportSoft, Inc. and will be retained by SupportSoft, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---

|1 | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed filed with the SEC and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2794 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2794

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase automatic maximum 
coverage under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance program and the 
    Veterans' Group Life Insurance program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 22 (legislative day, September 21), 2021

  Mr. Tuberville (for himself, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. 
  Braun, Mr. Barrasso, and Ms. Lummis) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase automatic maximum 
coverage under the Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance program and the 
    Veterans' Group Life Insurance program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Supporting Families of the Fallen 
Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AUTOMATIC MAXIMUM COVERAGE UNDER SERVICEMEMBERS' 
              GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE.

    (a) In General.--Section 1967(a)(3)(A)(i) of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by striking ``$400,000'' and inserting 
``$500,000''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on the later of--
            (1) the date that is 60 days after the date of the 
        enactment of this Act; or
            (2) the date on which the Secretary of Veterans Affairs 
        determines that--
                    (A) the amount for which a member will be insured 
                pursuant to the amendment made by subsection (a) and 
                the premiums for such amount are administratively and 
                actuarially sound for the Servicemembers' Group Life 
                Insurance program under subchapter III of chapter 19 of 
                title 38, United States Code, and the Veterans' Group 
                Life Insurance program under section 1977 of such 
                title; and
                    (B) the increase in such amount carried out 
                pursuant to the amendment will not result in such 
                programs operating at a loss.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17786]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07526]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Petroleum Environmental Research Forum Project 
No. 2013-07, Stream Speciation Update

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 23, 2015, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Petroleum Environmental 
Research Forum Project No. 2013-07, Stream Speciation Update (``PERF 
Project No. 2013-07'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
(1) the identities of the parties to the venture and (2) the nature and 
objectives of the venture. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of invoking the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances.
    Pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act, the identities of the parties 
to the venture are: ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company, 
Fairfax, VA; Chevron U.S.A., Inc., San Ramon, CA; BP Products North 
America Inc., Naperville, IL; and Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc., 
Houston, TX. The general area of PERF Project No. 2013-07's planned 
activity is, through cooperative research efforts, to explore whether 
sufficient changes in refinery stream compositions have occurred to 
warrant updating the existing PERF report (API, Refinery Stream 
Speciation, Publication Number 4723, November 2002). If justified, the 
project will consider utilizing a combination of Participant data 
already existing (blinded and de-identified) and/or publicly available 
company data to update the existing PERF report.

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-07526 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE P
Exhibit 10.2


 


	Original

Amount	 	Bank	 	Payment

Terms/Monthly

Installment	 	Due Date	 	Interest

Rate	 	Collateral	 	Comments
	R$560,167	 	Itau	 	12 Installment	 	June 18, 2014	 	1.40% am	 	Sewing Machinery and Personal Guarantee of Officer of our Brazilian Subsidiary	 	We will have a three-month grace period for installment payments
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Bruce D. Horn, Chief Financial Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



|1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Annual
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and
results of operations of the Company for the periods covered by the Annual Report.
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 26th day of September, 2003.



|/s/ Bruce D. Horn                    
|-------------------------------------
|Bruce D. Horn Chief Financial
Officer



This certification accompanies the
Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Oplink Communications, Inc. and will be retained by Oplink Communications, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
March Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

March 8, 2023
Data Sources

March 8, 2023

Objective Measurement

Florida Citrus

Row Count

Florida Citrus

Utilization Florida Citrus Administrative Committee

Data Quantity of Fruit Packed or Processed

Field Surveys

914 Groves February 13-21

70,782 Rows February 22-23
March 8, 2023

March 2023 Citrus

Utilized Production

All Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↑ 0.2

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 24.6

Non-Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↑ 0.3

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 12.7

Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 42.7

Grapefruit

% Change from Previous Estimate ↑ 1.2

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 12.3

Lemons

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 9.1

Tangerines

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 23.5

904

2,618

1,833

785

328

940

Production

(1,000 Tons)

9.37 9.03 8.73

7.70

6.08

8.14 7.85

6.91

5.61

4.79

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Million Tons

All Citrus Production

United States

6.77

6.35

6.09

5.09

3.88

5.43 5.25

4.39

3.47

2.62

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

Million Tons

All Orange Production

United States
March 8, 2023

2022 Field Crops

Acreage, Yield, and Production

Unit Unit

Sugarcane Ton Ton

% Change from Previous Estimate N/A ↑ 0.3 ↓ 1.1 ↓ 1.0

% Change from Previous Season N/A ↓ 0.5 ↑ 6.3 ↑ 5.6

Production

(1,000 Units)

N/A 930 37.3 34,671

Yield

(Units per Acre)

Harvested

(1,000 Acres)

Planted

(1,000 Acres)
Selected Upcoming Reports

March 8, 2023

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/index.php

Price Reactions After USDA Crop Reports

Price Reactions After USDA Livestock Reports

March 17 Cattle on Feed

March 30 Hogs and Pigs

Agricultural Prices

Grain Stocks

Prospective Plantings

Rice Stocks

Cotton System

Fats & Oils

Grain Crushings

Crop Progress

April 10 Crop Production Historical Track Records

April 11 Crop Production

March 10

April 3

March 31
2022 Census of Agriculture

March 8, 2023
2023 USDA Spring Data Users’ Meeting

March 8, 2023

Join Us Online or in Omaha

Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City - Omaha Branch

2201 Farnam Street

Omaha, NE 68102

For more information and to register please go to

www.nass.usda.gov/Education_and_Outreach/Meeting/index.php
#StatChat

March 8, 2023
All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

(202) 720-2127

(800) 727-9540

nass@usda.gov
M A N D A T E

THE STATE OF TEXAS

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF WEBB COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on January 27, 2016, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

E & S Oil Field Services, LLC, Appellant

V.

Juan Carlos Garza, Appellee

No. 04-15-00735-CV and Tr. Ct. No. 2014CVZ000131 C3

was determined, and therein our said Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. Costs of the appeal are taxed

against appellant.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of

Texas, with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on April 18, 2016.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTH DISTRICT, AT SAN ANTONIO

No. 04-15-00735-CV

E & S Oil Field Services, LLC

v.

Juan Carlos Garza

(NO. 2014CVZ000131 C3 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 2 OF WEBB COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID BY

FILING $205.00 NOT PAID N/A

Balance of costs owing to the Fourth Court of Appeals, San Antonio, Texas: $205.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK OF THE FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF

TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of

THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and

payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for

the Fourth District of Texas, this April 18, 2016.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
Exhibit
      32.2




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
      TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Jean
      Perrotti, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





1.
      the
      Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      the
      information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:
              February 23, 2007
            
            /s/
              Jean
              PerrottiName:
                Jean Perrotti
              Title:
                Chief Financial Officer
              And Principle Accounting Officer
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00173-CR

RAVEN FAYE THIEBAUD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 355th District Court

of Hood County (CR13249)

February 28, 2019

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment, the incorporated order to 

withdraw funds, and the bill of costs are modified to delete the $15 filing fee for the 

State’s motion to revoke probation. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court 

is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
# C_2015145EN.01000102.xml

| 1.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7476 — Holtzbrinck Publishing Group/Springer Science+Business Media GP Acquisition SCA/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 145/02)

On 31 March 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7476. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7476. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00286

- CV

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS

- PAN AMERICAN v. MARION AYALA
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 2 of Hidalgo County , Texas

Trial Cause No. CL

- 11

- 0015

- B

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, havi ng considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for obs ervance. January 9, 2014
Pima Cotton 2022

Production by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Bales

Not Estimated

< 50,000

50,000 - 99,999

100,000 +
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL CLOTHES WASHERS AND RESIDENTIAL DISHWASHERS,

DEHUMIDIFIERS, AND COOKING PRODUCTS

U.S. Department of Energy

Room GE-086

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

April 27, 2006

Purpose : The Department will present its methodology for conducting the energy

conservation standards rulemaking for commercial clothes washers and residential

dishwashers, dehumidifiers, and cooking products. The Department also will seek input

from stakeholders on its planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.

Agenda

9:00 - 9:05 a.m.

9:05 - 9:30 a.m.

9:30 - 9:45 a.m.

9:45 - 11:15 a.m.

11:15 -11:30 a.m.

11:30 - 12:00 p.m.

12:00 - 1:00 p.m.

1:00 - 2:15 p.m.

2:15 - 2:55 p.m.

2:55 - 3:15 p.m.

3:15 - 3:30 p.m.

3:30 - 4:00 p.m.

4:00 - 4:45 p.m.

Welcome

Opening Remarks, Introductions, and Agenda

Review

Introduction and Analytical Methodology

Market and Technology Assessment, Screening

Analysis, and Engineering Analysis

Break

Market and Technology Assessment, Screening

Analysis, and Engineering Analysis (continued)

Break for Lunch

Energy and Water Use, Markups for Equipment

Price Determination, and Life-Cycle Cost and

Payback Period Analysis

Shipments Analysis, National Impact Analysis, and

LCC Subgroup Analysis

Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Break

Utility Impact Analysis, Employment Impact

Analysis, Environmental Assessment, and

Regulatory Impact Analysis

Other Issues and Comments / Closing Remarks

4:45 p.m. Adjourn

 EE-2006-STD-0127 COMMENT 04.2
# C_2016100EN.01000102.xml

| 16.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 100/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 100/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7799 — Schlumberger/Cameron)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 100/02)

On 4 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7799. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7799. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

RONALD EVANS, §
§ No. 421, 2016
Defendant Below- §
Appellant, §
§
v. § Court Below: Superior Court
§ of the State of Delaware
STATE OF DELAWARE, §
§ Cr. ID Nos. 0808023433 and
Plaintiff Below- § 0807012992
Appellee. §

Submitted: December 1, 2016
Decided: December 7, 2016

ORDER

This 7" day of December 2016, it appears to the Court that, on
November 16, 2016, the Chief Deputy Court Clerk issued a notice to the
appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for his failure
to file his opening brief on appeal. The appellant failed to respond to the
notice to show cause within the required ten-day period; therefore, dismissal
of this action is deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, under Supreme
Court Rules 3(b) and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Randy J. Holland
Justice