Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices 17715 

assessment tool, which allows users to 

monitor their daily food intakes and 

physical activity information. Based on 

the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 

the SuperTracker delivers nutrition 

education by allowing users to monitor 

their intake and explore ways to 

improve their food and physical activity 

choices. Motivational education 

messages are generated and tailored to 

the user’s personal assessment results. 

Individuals can use the SuperTracker 

without registration. However, all users 

may voluntarily enter and save 

information by registering with a 

username and password. The historical 

and trend data entered allows users to 

identify areas for improvement and 

reference short- and long-term changes 

to diet and physical activity behaviors. 

SuperTracker includes optional 

functions that consumers may use at 

their discretion, including a journaling 

feature to capture information for a 

selected category. Consumers may also 

post system-generated congratulatory 

and tip messages to Facebook or Twitter 

using their personal social media 

account. Through leveraging the user’s 

existing social network, the user is more 

likely to experience positive feedback 

and encouragement in achieving their 

dietary and/or physical activity goals. 

Social media functionality is provided 

as a consumer benefit but does not 

impact consumer results or reports. 

Access to the SuperTracker is obtained 

at SuperTracker.usda.gov. 

Affected Public: Individual/ 

Households. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

The following total annual burden 

estimates are based on the data obtained 

from current web trend tool, Google 

Analytics from January 2014–December 

2014. 

• The number of annual visitors to 

the Web site is expected to be about 11.2 

million, and they will spend 

approximately 5 minutes one time only. 

• Approximately 30 percent of annual 

visitors will complete a one-time 

registration, log-in and assessment for 

the revised online assessment tool. This 

information is based on data from 

Google Analytics (rounded up = 3.3 

million). 

• The average number of weekly 

visitors is approximately 200,000. 

• 30 percent of the weekly visitors 

return each week to complete tracking 

activities (approximately 60,000). 

Estimated Number of Responses per 

Respondent: 4.5. 

Estimated Total Annual Responses: 

11,200,000. 

Estimated Time per Response: 

0.236448065. 

For the SuperTracker, it will take 

individuals approximately 1 minute 

(.0167) to initially register for a system 

logon ID and password. It typically 

takes users 30 seconds (.0083) to 

routinely login to the system and 

approximately 15 minutes (.25) to 

complete food and physical activity data 

entry log for 1 day. Repeat users will 

enter data on average 3 times per week. 

The amount of time spent completing 

entry and using functionality is 

estimated at 45 minutes per week. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden on 

Respondents: 3,787,898 hours. 

SUPERTRACKER BURDEN ESTIMATES

Affected public Description of 

activity (b) Form No. 

(c) Number 

annual 

respondents 

(d) Annual 

frequency of 

responses per 

respondent 

(e) Estimated 

total annual 

responses 

(c×d) 

(f) Hours per 

response 

(g) Total 

annual burden 

(e×f) 

Reporting Burden 

Individual and 

households.

Annual Website 

Visitors.

........................ 11,200,000 1 11,200,000 0 .05 560,000 

One time SuperTracker registration.N/A 3,300,000 1 3,300,000 0 .0167 55,110 

One time SuperTracker Log-in.N/A 3,300,000 1 3,300,000 0 .0083 27,390 

Food/Physical 

Activity Data 

Entry for 1 

Week.

N/A 3,300,000 1 3,300,000 0 .25 825,000 

Repeat Log-ins 

for 1 Year.

N/A 60,000 51 3,060,000 .00 0 .0083 25,398 

Repeat Food/ 

Physical Activity Data Entries 

for 1 Year.

N/A 60,000 51 3,060,000 .00 0 .75 2,295,000 

Total Annual 

Burden 

Est..

............................ ........................ 3,600,000 4 .45 16,020,000 0 .236448065 3,787,898 

Dated: March 25, 2015. 

Angela M. Tagtow, 

Executive Director, Center for Nutrition Policy 

and Promotion. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07592 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE CODE 3410–30–P 

ARMED FORCES RETIREMENT HOME 

Notice of Intent To Prepare a 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement for the Proposed Master 

Development Plan for the Armed 

Forces Retirement Home in 

Washington, DC 

AGENCY: Armed Forces Retirement 

Home (AFRH). 

ACTION: Notice of Intent to prepare a 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the requirements 

of the National Environmental Policy 

Act of 1969 (NEPA), AFRH plans to 

prepare a Supplemental Environmental 

Impact Statement (SEIS) for the 

proposed AFRH Master Development 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17716 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401– 

2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the 

EAA has been in lapse and the President, through 

Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR., 

2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended 

by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent 

being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August 

11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect 

under the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. § 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. 

IV 2010)). 

Plan in Washington, DC. The SEIS will 

provide new analysis based on changes 

to the original master development plan, 

and changes in governing regulations. 

DATES: Effective: April 3, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Justin Seffens, Corporate Facilities 

Director, AFRH, at (202) 541–7549, or 

Tim Sheckler, Project Manager, GSA, at 

(202) 401–5806. The U.S. General 

Services Administrator (GSA) is 

preparing the SEIS on behalf of AFRH. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant 

to the requirements of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA), 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 

4321–4347; the Council on 

Environmental Quality Regulations 

(Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 

Title 40, chapter V, parts 1500–1508); 

and AFRH’s Environmental Policy, 38 

CFR part 200, AFRH plans to prepare a 

Supplemental Environmental Impact 

Statement (SEIS) for the proposed 

Master Plan Development at the Armed 

Forces Retirement Home in Washington, 

DC. 

AFRH intends to prepare an SEIS to 

analyze the potential impacts resulting 

from the proposed changes to the 

original master development plan. 

Factors known to have changed since 

the previous study include construction 

of a new building, the Scott Building, on 

the AFRH campus; a $15 million 

restoration and expansion of the 

Lincoln’s Cottage historic site; closure of 

the Heating Plant and inclusion of the 

Plant in the development area; the 

anticipated development of the 

McMillan Reservoir parcel immediately 

south of AFRH; and other area 

development. 

Background 

Established in 1851, the AFRH in 

Washington, DC continues its mission 

as a retirement community for military 

veterans. The 276-acre site is currently 

developed with 93 structures including 

the U.S. Soldiers’ and Airmen’s Home 

National Landmark District. 

In 2002, the National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2002 

(Pub. L. 107–107, 24 U.S.C. 411, et seq.) 

gave the AFRH, with approval of the 

Secretary of Defense, authority to 

dispose of any property by sale, lease, 

or otherwise that is excess to the needs 

of the AFRH. In 2010, The National 

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 

Year 2010 (Pub. L. 111–84, 24 U.S.C. 

411) modified this authority to allow the 

Secretary of Defense (acting on behalf of 

AFRH) to lease non-excess property 

upon such terms as the Secretary 

considers will promote the purpose and 

financial stability of the Retirement 

Home or be in the public interest. 

Proceeds from such a lease are 

deposited to AFRH’s Trust Fund. To 

implement these authorities, AFRH 

prepared a Master Development Plan 

and issued a Record of Decision in 2008 

for its 276-acre campus in Washington, 

DC to guide the long-term use and 

development of the site. AFRH was 

unable to reach agreement with the 

initially selected developer. AFRH now 

anticipates releasing a new solicitation 

and selecting a new development 

partner. 

Alternatives Under Consideration 

AFRH will analyze the proposed 

action and no action alternatives for the 

proposed Master Development Plan. 

The proposed action alternative(s) will 

include development of a portion of the 

site for office, commercial, institutional, 

and residential uses. As part of the EIS, 

AFRH will study the impacts of each 

alternative on the human environment. 

Scoping Process 

In accordance with 40 CFR 

1502.9(c)(4), there will be no scoping 

conducted for this SEIS. 

Steven G. McManus, 

Chief Operating Officer, Armed Forces 

Retirement Home. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07621 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE CODE 3030–ZA–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

In the Matter of: Precision Image 

Corporation, 22424 76th Avenue 

Southeast, Woodinville, WA 98072 

Order Denying Export Privileges 

On October 28, 2013, in the U.S. 

District Court, Western District of 

Washington at Seattle, Precision Image 

Corporation, was convicted of violating 

Section 38 of the Arms Export Control 

Act (22 U.S.C. § 2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’). 

Specifically, Precision Image 

Corporation willfully exported from the 

United States technical data designated 

on the United States Munitions List, 

International Traffic in Arms 

Regulations, namely, a PCB, Sensor 

Motherboard, H–1 Gyro, PESK–7571, 

which is covered by Category XII(f) of 

the United States Munitions List, 

without having obtained from the 

United States Department of State a 

license or written approval for the 

export of this technical data. Precision 

Image Corporation was sentenced to 3 

years of probation, criminal fine of 

$300,000 and an assessment of $400. 

Section 766.25 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or 

‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent 

part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of 

Exporter Services, in consultation with 

the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny the export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of the Export 

Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR, 

or any order, license or authorization 

issued thereunder; any regulation, 

license, or order issued under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. § 1701–1706); 18 

U.S.C. §§ 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) 

of the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 

U.S.C. § 783(b)), or section 38 of the 

Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

§ 2778).’’ 15 CFR. § 766.25(a); see also 

Section 11(h) of the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. 

§ 2410(h). The denial of export 

privileges under this provision may be 

for a period of up to 10 years from the 

date of the conviction. 15 CFR. 

§ 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. app. 

§ 2410(h). In addition, Section 750.8 of 

the Regulations states that the Bureau of 

Industry and Security’s Office of 

Exporter Services may revoke any 

Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) 

licenses previously issued in which the 

person had an interest in at the time of 

its conviction. 

BIS has received notice of Precision 

Image Corporation’s conviction for 

violating the AECA, and have provided 

notice and an opportunity for Precision 

Image Corporation to make a written 

submission to BIS, as provided in 

Section 766.25 of the Regulations. BIS 

has received and reviewed a submission 

from Precision Image Corporation. 

Based upon my review and 

consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Export Enforcement, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Precision Image 

Corporation’s export privileges under 

the Regulations for a period of 10 years 

from the date of Precision Image 

Corporation’s conviction. I have also 

decided to revoke all licenses issued 

pursuant to the Act or Regulations in 

which Precision Image Corporation had 

an interest at the time of its conviction. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES