alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015324EN.01000102.xml

| 2.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 324/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 324/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7753 — Sacyr/Fluor Corporation/Fluor Spain)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 324/02)

On 24 September 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7753. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Search Help More Search Options Search

EERE Information Center

Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts 

Framework Meeting 

The Department of Energy (DOE) will hold an informal public 

meeting as a first step in the rulemaking process to amend 

energy conservation standards for fluorescent lamp ballasts and 

adopt standards for additional fluorescent lamps ballasts, if such 

additional standards are warranted. 

Please note that foreign nationals visiting DOE headquarters are 

subject to advance security screening procedures. Foreign 

nationals wishing to attend this meeting must inform DOE of this 

fact by contacting Brenda Edwards before January 30, 2008, at 

(202) 586-2945. 

The following documents are available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. 

Download Acrobat Reader. 

Meeting Materials 

z Notice of Public Meeting and Availability of the Framework 

Document, issued by DOE January 14, 2008 (PDF 55 KB) 

z Rulemaking Framework Document for Fluorescent Lamp 

Ballasts, January 14, 2008 (PDF 1 MB) 

Comments 

All comments submitted must identify the Fluorescent Lamp 

Ballast Rulemaking activity to which it corresponds, with the 

appropriate docket number and/or regulatory information number

(RIN). The docket number and RIN for the fluorescent lamp 

ballast rule are: 

z Docket number EERE-2007-BT-STD-0016 and RIN 1904-

AB50 

Comments may be submitted using any of the following methods:

z Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov

and follow the instructions for submitting comments. 

z E-mail: ballasts.rulemaking@ee.doe.gov

Please be sure to include the docket number and/or RIN in 

the subject line of the message. 

DATE: Wednesday, February 6, 2008 

TIME: 9:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. EDT 

LOCATION: U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Room 1E-245 

Washington, DC 20585 

Appliances & Commercial Equipment Standards: Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Framework Meeting Page 1 of 2

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/ballast_framework_mtg.html 1/17/2008

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0007 COMMENT 02
z Mail: 

Mrs. Brenda Edwards 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Mailstop: EE-2J 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585-0121 

Please submit one signed paper original. 

z Hand Delivery/Courier: 

Mrs. Brenda Edwards 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585-0121 

Telephone: (202) 586-2945 

Please submit one signed paper original. 

Printable Version

Webmaster | Security & Privacy | Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home

U.S. Department of Energy 

Content Last Updated: 01/15/2008 

Appliances & Commercial Equipment Standards: Fluorescent Lamp Ballasts Framework Meeting Page 2 of 2

http://www.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/ballast_framework_mtg.html 1/17/2008

EERE-2008-BT-TP-0007 COMMENT 02
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B L US GU I N O T ON I E L AL VA R E NG AM ELG A R, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 73687 A ge nc yN o. A 088- 423- 377 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

an O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d M ay24, 2011 ** B efo re: P R E G E R S O N , T H O M A S , an dP A E Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. B l u sg u i n O t o n i el A l v aren g a-M el g ar, a n at i v e an dci t i zen o f H o n du ras, pet i t i on s f

or re vi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d is m is s in g h is ap p e a l f

r o m an im m ig r a tio n ju d g e ’s d e c is io n d e n y in g h is m o tio n to r e o p e n r e m o v a l p r o c e e d in g s . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e 

# FI LED JU N 01 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 73687 2 r e vi e w f orabus e of

di s c r e t i on the de ni a l of am ot i on t o r e ope n and de novo c o n s titu tio n a l c la im s . L in v . A s h c r o ft , 3 7 7 F .3 d1 0 1 4 , 1 0 2 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e d e n yth e p e t i t i o n f

o rr e v i e w. T he a ge nc ydi d notabus e i t s di s c r e t i on i n de ny i ng the m ot i on t o r e ope n on the gr ound tha tA l var e nga - M e l garf a i l e d t o de m ons tr a t e pr i m af a c i e e l i gi bi l i tyf

or a s y lu m w h e r e h e f

a ile dto id e n tif

yas o u r c e o f

p e r s e c u tio n o rd e m o n s tr a te aw e llfoun ded fear . See Mendez- G ut i errez v . G on zales , 44 4 F . 3d 11 68 , 11 71 (9th C i r. 2 0 0 6 ) ( th e B I A m ayd e n yam o tio n to r e o p e n f o rf a ilu r e to e s tab lis h ap r im af a c ie c a s e f o rth e u n d e r ly in g r e lie f

s o u g h t) ; s e e a l

s o Kh o u ra s s a n

yv . I NS , 208 F . 3d 1096, 11 01 (9th C i r. 20 00 ) ( ho l di ng si m i l ar l y s i tuat ed, un harm ed fam i l y m em bers u n d e rm i n e f

u tu r e f e arwh e n an a l i e n c l a i m s f e arb a s e do n f

a m i l yg r o up ) . I tf

o l l o ws th a t A lv ar e n g a - M e lg arh a s n o t e s tab lis h e dav io la tio n o f du e p r o c e s s . See L ata v. I NS , 204 F . 3d 1241, 1246 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( r e qui r i ng e rr orand pr e j udi c e f oradue proces s vi ol at i on ). PETI TI O N FO R R EVI EW D EN I ED .
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

# SUMMARY:

                        This document corrects a notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on March 12, 2015 Volume 80, Number 48, page 13012. The time and date should read as follows:                    

*Time and Date:*                         11:00 a.m.-6:00 p.m., April 1, 2015 (Closed).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        M. Chris Langub, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway NE., Mailstop F46, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3585,                         *EEO6@cdc.gov*.                    

                        The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                         **Federal Register**                         notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                    

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2015-07545 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE CODE 4163-18-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00121-CV

Evans P. Weaver, Appellant

v.

James Korenek and Kelli Korenek, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 201ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-04-000697, HONORABLE SUZANNE COVINGTON, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On February 27, 2007, Evans P. Weaver filed a notice of appeal from a June 15, 2004

order granting final summary judgment for James and Kelli Korenek on their claims alleging breach

of a settlement agreement byWeaver and Weaver Companies, L.L.C. As it appears to the Court that

Weaver filed for bankruptcy during the pendency of the underlying proceedings, and they remain

subject to the automatic stay, see 11 U.S.C.A. § 362(a) (2004), this appeal is abated until further

order of the court. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2, 8.3. 

____________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Pemberton and Waldrop

Bankruptcy

Filed: September 19, 2007
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
# C_2016261EN.01000101.xml

| 19.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 261/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 261/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8000 — DCC/Dansk Fuels)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 261/01)

On 20 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8000. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8000. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
NEOMEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


                                      125

<PAGE>


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on F orm S-8 (File No. 333-42477) of
our report dated October 24, 1997, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31,
1996 and for the year then ended, which is included in Company's Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 1997.


/s/ COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
-----------------------------
COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Chicago, Illinois
March 30, 1998

                                      126
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Capella Education
Company;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Stephen G. ShankStephen G. ShankChairman and Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 30, 2016

NO. 03-16-00479-CR

Edgar Penaloza, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00002-CR

JASON PAUL TIJERINA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 15-03-28549-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 31, 2018
For Immediate Release





Harmonic Completes Acquisition of Thomson Video Networks





SAN JOSE, Calif. - Feb. 29, 2016 - Harmonic (NASDAQ: HLIT), the worldwide leader in video delivery infrastructure, today announced that it has completed the acquisition of Thomson Video Networks (TVN), a global leader in advanced video compression solutions.


“We are pleased to announce the closing of the TVN acquisition,” said Patrick Harshman, President and CEO of Harmonic. “By bringing together two powerhouses in the video industry, we further extend our position as the market leader. With expanded global R&D, sales and support teams, we are accelerating innovation and driving delivery of best-in-class solutions, products, capabilities and support services for our customers.”





Further information about Harmonic and the company’s products is available at www.harmonicinc.com .





# # #





About Harmonic


Harmonic (NASDAQ: HLIT) is the worldwide leader in video delivery infrastructure for emerging television and video services. Harmonic enables customers to produce, deliver and monetize amazing video experiences, with unequalled business agility and operational efficiency, by providing market-leading innovation, high-quality service and compelling total cost of ownership. More information is available at www.harmonicinc.com.





Forward Looking Statements


This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements relating to our market leading position and accelerating innovation.  Our expectations and beliefs regarding these matters may not materialize and are subject to risks and uncertainties, including that anticipated business opportunities or acceleration of innovation for the combined company do not fully materialize; unanticipated difficulties and delays with integrating the two companies; failure to retain key employees; economic conditions in the markets that the companies operate in; and other risks and uncertainties such as those more fully described in Harmonic’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2014, its Quarterly











More...




---




Reports on Form 10-Q and its Current Reports on Form 8-K. The forward-looking statements in this press release are based on information available to Harmonic as of the date hereof, and Harmonic disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements.





EDITOR’S NOTE - Product and company names used herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.





CONTACTS:


Hal CovertChief Financial OfficerHarmonic542.2500+1.408.490.7021hal.covert@harmonicinc.comBlair KingDirector, Investor RelationsHarmonic+1.408.490.6172blair.king@harmonicinc.com






































































































































ENDS
**U.S. Access Board: Rail Vehicles Access Advisory Committee On**  **- board Circulation and Seating Subcommittee (Meeting #6)** 

**June 12, 2014 1:00 -**  **3:00 (ET) Agenda: Continuation of May 7 conference call (Meeting #5)**  **Handouts: Those provided for May 7 conference call**  **Regulations.gov Link to May 7 material:** http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=ATBCB- 2013 - 0006 - 0058
#### Kay v. McKay Chevrolet Corp.

*Chester T. Cyzio,*for plaintiff.

*Charles H. Greenberg,*for defendant.

March 1, 1978

McDEVITT, *J.,*

This case arises out of an appeal from an arbitration award for defendant, dated September 15,1977. The back of the arbitrator’s report indicates that it was filed on September 16 and indexed on September 19. The docket entry for the award also shows these two dates. The appeal herein by plaintiff was filed on *368October 4, and the notice thereof was apparently mailed on October 6.

Defendant has moved to quash plaintiff’s appeal on the ground that his attorney failed to comply with Rule VI of the Philadelphia Rules of Arbitration which provide that the notice of appeal and service thereof upon the adverse party must be accomplished within 20 days “after the entry of the Award of the Board on the docket of the Office of the Prothonotary.” Defendant asks us to regard September 16, the date the award was filed, as the starting date for computing the 20-day period. Under this theory, service of the *notice*of the appeal was made one day late. However, the applicable rule makes clear that the date of docketing, rather than the date of filing, controls. This is a reflection of the fact that some lag between filing and docketing is inevitable in view of the staggering volume of papers handled each day by our prothonotary. Therefore, September 19 was the starting date here, putting the date of service within the 20-day period outlined by Rule VI of Rules of Arbitration. As such, the motion to quash is denied: See Gould v. Lampley, 225 Pa. Superior Ct. 107, 310 A. 2d 420 (1973).

ORDER

And now, March 1, 1978, it is herein ordered and decreed that defendant’s motion to quash plaintiffs appeal be dismissed.