alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07639]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Clinical Laboratory Improvement Advisory Committee

    Correction: This notice was published in the Federal Register on 
March 24, 2015, Volume 80, Number 56, Pages 15621-15622. The times and 
dates should read as follows:
    Times and Dates: 12:30 p.m.--5:00 p.m., April 15, 2015; 8:30 a.m.--
12:00 p.m., April 16, 2015.

Contact Person for Additional Information:  Nancy Anderson, Chief, 
Laboratory Practice Standards Branch, Division of Laboratory Programs, 
Standards, and Services, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology and 
Laboratory Services, Office of Public Health Scientific Services, CDC, 
1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop F-11, Atlanta, Georgia 30329-4018; 
telephone (404) 498-2741; or via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89c7c8e7edecfbfae6e7c9eaedeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4eae5cac0c1d6d7cbcae4c7c0c78ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities for 
both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for 
Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Catherine Ramadei,
Acting Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-07639 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of deCODE genetics, Inc. (the "Registrant") for the year ended December 31,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, Kari Stefansson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, and
Lance Thibault, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Registrant, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (2) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

|                      |  |  | /s/KARI STEFANSSONKari Stefansson
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|--------------------- |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: March 17, 2008 |  |  |                                                                                  
|                      |  |  | /s/LANCE THIBAULTLance Thibault
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer            
|Dated: March 17, 2008 |  |  |                                                                                  

---



QuickLinks
Home Deadliest Most Expensive Blowouts Collapse Sunk Rigs Hurricanes Rig List Guestbook Links



# Ensco 51

1. Ensco 51 blowout: before ignition

2. Ensco 51: fire and

collapsed derrick

3. Ensco 51: fire and

collapsed derrick

4. Ensco 51: Rig and platform damage 

### Rig: Ensco 51 Jack-Up
Date: 01 March 2001
Location: Platform A, Eugene Island Block 273, Gulf of Mexico Operator: Forest Oil Corporation

Summary Working offshore Louisiana, the crew of the Ensco 51 had just set casing when the well experienced an uncontrolled flow, causing a blowout and fire.

The 14-3/4" hole had been TD'd at 1700 ft and 10-3/4" casing run and circulated with no gas observed. The casing was then cemented and left to cure. In the early hours of 01 March, the casing was cut to length at surface and the slip-on wellhead positioned over the casing. Welding operations on the wellhead began, during which time a small blue flame was observed and extinguished. The source was thought to be grease. No gas was detected. Welding then continued and a second flame was observed, slightly larger than the previous flame. The area was again checked for gas resulting in the gas detector showing its maximum level. At 0130 hours, the driller observed flow from 10+ valve on the conductor below the platform.

Attempts were made to stem the increasing flow of gas and fluids from 10+ valve using sea water and weighted drilling mud but sufficient volume could not be added to slow the flow. The flow continued to increase and the decision was made to abandon both the rig and platform at 0300 hours. The 10+ valve was opened to divert the flow of gas away from the rig and platform, and all 43 personnel were then safely evacuated via two lifeboats to Platform B.

Specialist personnel from Wild Well Control were called in to help with capping and killing operations but the gas flow ignited in the early hours of 02 March, due to an unknown ignition source. The well partially bridged on 03 March, causing the fire to go out, and the well was subsequently killed. Production on the platform had been shut-in during drilling ops, which probably prevented a greater fire.

During the fire, the Ensco 51's derrick and substructure were completely destroyed, with the derrick collapsing onto the platform. The platform and its production equipment were also extensively damaged. In the 2nd quarter of 2002, Keppel FELS won the contract to upgrade and repair the Ensco 51 in Singapore for re-deployment in the Asia-Pacific region by November 2002.

Sources: Minerals Management Service: MMS 2001-084 Investigation

Photos
1. MMS 2001-084 Investigation 2. Source not known 3. Canadian Wellsite
4. MMS 2001-084 Investigation

[ Home | Deadliest | Most Expensive | Blowouts | Collapse | Sunk Rigs | Hurricanes | Rig List | Links ] 

# Pa g e 1 of 1 Ensco 51 Blowout - Oil Ri g Disasters - Offshore Drillin g Accidents

11/30/2011 htt p ://home.versatel.nl/the

_ sims/ri g /ensco51.htm
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 21

                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


       Name                        State of Organization     Percentage Owned
       ----                        ---------------------     ----------------
Odd-Job Holdings, Inc.                    Delaware                  100%

Odd-Job Acquisition Corp.                 Delaware                  100% (1)

ZS Peddlers Mart, Inc.                    Delaware                  100% (2)

Odd Job Trading Corp.                     New York                  100% (2)

HIA Trading Associates                    New York                  100% (3)

VCM, Ltd.                                 Ohio                      50%

--------------

(1)   Wholly-owned subsidiary of Odd-Job Holdings, Inc.

(2)   Wholly-owned subsidiary of Odd-Job Acquisition Corp.

(3)   General partnership with Odd-Job Acquisition Corp. and Odd Job Trading
      Corp. as partners.



                                       48
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF VYYO INC. FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,824
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      788
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        906
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,694
<PP&E>                                           1,087
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,722
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     15,285
<COMMON>                                       14,1959
<OTHER-SE>                                    (34,421)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (4,941)
<SALES>                                          3,076
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,076
<CGS>                                            3,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,495
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (556)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,866)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,866)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,866)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.76)


</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 1049

_____________________________
E ZELL G EDDIS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

___________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. James C. Hankinson , Judge.

March 21, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
J AY , W INSOR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General
, for Appellee.
Akutan Traditional Council 

P. 0. Box89 

Akutan, Alaska 99553-0089 

(907) 698-2300 I 2301 Fax 

• • • • • • • • • • ·' • ¥ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .,., .. ~ .... • '!';....,.,-: · • ·1· # • ~-- ··";'·L~ · ~ ·1~ 

October 26, 2012 

Mr. Dennis J. Devany 

ChiefEAS and Domestic Analysis 

U.S. Department ofT ransportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington DC 20590 

Re: Native Village of Akutan comments on EAS by Grant Aviation at Ak.un, Alaska. 

Dear Mr. Devany, 

Just recently, unexpectedly, Pen Air halted all air service to Akutan with the use of the 

Grumman Goose. The Grumman Goose was our only air service we depended on for 

mail, freight and passenger service to connect to the mainland and the lower 48 states. 

Furthermore, the residents depend on this air service for their medication, social security 

checks, and longevity checks to arrive. This will have a huge negative impact on our 

elders that are on a set income. Without the Grumman Goose, we are stranded here on 

Akutan Island, or on Amaknak: Island ( where there is a large airport for larger planes to 

land) while travelling from Anchorage, Alaska, or from the lower 48 waiting to get back 

home to Akutan. Akutan is only accessible by motor vessels, or by seaplane. 

After reviewing the proposal submitted by Grant Aviation to the U.S. D.O.T. for 

Essential Air Seniice (EAS) between Dutch Harbor Alaska and Ak.un Island Alaska, the 

Native Village of Akutan strongly supports Grants Aviation's proposal for air 

transportation of passengers, mail, and freight between Dutch Harbor and the runway 

built on Akun Island. 

The·Native Village of Akutan requests that the U.S. Department of Transportation 

approves Grant Aviations EAS proposal, so we can continue to have reliable air service 

from Akun Island to Dutch Harbor. 

Sin~~ 

f:b Stepetffi, Admirii,_, 

Native Village of Akutan
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

###### Veterans' Rural Health Advisory Committee

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the Veterans Rural Health Advisory Committee will meet on April 21-22, 2015, in Room 156, at the VA Medical Center, 17273 State Route 104, Chillicothe, Ohio from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. on both days. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on health care issues affecting enrolled Veterans residing in rural areas. The Committee examines programs and policies that impact the provision of VA health care to enrolled Veterans residing in rural areas, and discusses ways to improve and enhance VA services for these Veterans.

The agenda will include updates from the Committee Chairman and the Director of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Rural Health (ORH), as well as presentations on general health care access and quality topics.

                    Public comments will be received at 4:30 p.m. on April 22, 2015. Interested parties should contact Mr. Elmer D. Clark, by mail at 810 Vermont Avenue, Mail Code 10P1R, Washington, DC 20420, or via email at                     *VRHAC@va.gov*, or by fax at (202) 632-8609. Individuals scheduled to speak are invited to submit a 1-2 page summary of their comments for inclusion in the official meeting record.                

Dated: March 27, 2015.

Rebecca Schiller,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-07509 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE CODE 8320-01-P
#### Strong *against*Beardslee.

Under the act to extend jurisdiction of justices of the peace" (sess 41) passed April 10th 1818 where the demand exceeds ther party has mallei' that the jury should consist of *twelve;*but he , must make his demand, for that purpose, *before*the *venire*issues, in order that *twenty*may be summoned: if he waits until a *venire*is returned with twelve, *sice*of which are swovn, he is too late^ and must be concluded*

IN ERROR, on *certiorari,*to a Justice’s Court,

*Beardslee*sued *Strong,*for beating and wounding his dog, an(I c^a’me(I fifty dollars damages. *S.*pleaded not guilty, 311^ th0. plaintiff demanded a trial by jury. The cause was then adjourned, and at the adjourned day, the parties appeared, when the *venire*was returned with a panel of *twelve*jurors, from which the justice drew *six,*who were sworn ; the defendant insisted, that the cause ought to be tried be*131fore twelve jurors, as the damages claimed were above 25 dollars *•,*the justice overruled the objection, and there was a verdict and judgment for the. plaintiff, for 17 dollars., and Costs*

*Per*Curiam.

According to the true construction of the 22d section of the “ act to extend the jurisdiction of justices of the peace,’’ (sess. 41. ch. 94.) passed *April*10th> 1818, where the sum demanded exceeds 25 dollars, either party has a right to insist,- that the jury shall consist of *twelve,*instead of six jurors : but the party must make his demand of the justice, that the jury should consist of twelve, before the *venire*is issued, so. that *twenty*may be summoned. Here the *venire*was for *twelve*jurors, and there was no demand or claim to have more summoned, until *six*were drawn and sworn. The defendant was then too late. The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2015299EN.01000101.xml

| 11.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7498 — Compagnie de Saint Gobain/SIKA)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 299/01)

On 22 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7498. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7498. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**
**Exhibit 31.3**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, Dan Mondor, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed thisAmendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Inseego Corp.; and 

2. Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report. 

Date: April 30, 2019 

 
/s/ Dan Mondor**Dan Mondor**
*Chief Executive Officer*

*(principalexecutive officer)*
**
NUMBER 13-11-00082-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

VICTOR AMAYA RIOS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36th District Court 

of San Patricio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Victor Amaya Rios, was convicted of bail jumping. Appellant filed a pro 

se notice of appeal and on August 18, 2011, appointed counsel filed a motion to dismiss 

the appeal. Counsel advised this Court that the appellant did not wish to proceed with 

his appeal, but was unwilling to sign the motion to dismiss. On August 25, 2011, this
2

Court denied the motion to dismiss because it did not contain the appellant’s signature 

and abated the appeal with instructions to the trial court to make findings as to whether 

the appellant had abandoned his appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2 (a). 

Based on the trial court hearing, the trial court judge found that appellant does not 

desire to prosecute the appeal. Although no written motion has been filed in compliance 

with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, based upon the evidence at 

the hearing that appellant does not want to continue his appeal, we conclude that good 

cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the 29th

day of September, 2011.
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 17, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00149-CV

LESLIE ANN SHERRILL, Appellant 

V.

HOWARD S. LAW II, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 247th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-58434 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 1, 2018. The notice of 

appeal was filed February 26, 2018. To date, our records show appellant has not paid 

the appellate filing fee, and no evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed.. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 5; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207. On March 27, 2018, this court ordered 

appellant to pay the appellate filing fee by April 6, 2018, or the appeal would be 

dismissed. The filing fee has not been paid.
2

Further, no clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing 

the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to 

pay for the record. On April 17, 2018, the court notified all parties of the court’s 

intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, 

appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court 

with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No such proof has been filed.

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) 

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant failed to comply with 

order or notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Busby.