alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 4 DB 2023 (No. 23 RST 2023)

:

PATRICIA FLYNN HENRY : Attorney Registration No. 87873

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION : (Delaware County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 16th day of March, 2023, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated March 3, 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED that

PATRICIA FLYNN HENRY, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has 

demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency and learning in law 

required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby 

reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses 

incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by 

the Petitioner.
EX-4.2



 Exhibit 4.2 
 




 
 No.: Class B Shares 

QIWI PLC 
 Incorporated under the Companies Law, Cap 113 

SHARE CAPITAL 
 Authorised Share Capital: Euro divided into Class shares of Euro each and Class B shares of EURO each. 
 Issued Share Capital: Euro divided into Class B shares of Euro each. 
 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT of is the Registered Proprietor of () Class B shares of EURO each, in the above-named Company, numbered from to inclusive, subject to the Memorandum and Articles of
Association of the Company, and that upon each of such Shares the sum of EURO has been paid. 
 GIVEN under the
Common Seal of the above Company, this th day of 20. 
 DIRECTOR SECRETARY 

SPECIMEN
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 06, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 06, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0091. SPENCER TRACY MASON v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

R145835
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Sally Goff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.       /s/ SALLY L. GOFF     Sally L. Goff    *Chief Financial Officer*  Date: May 9, 2007
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-60245 Conference Calendar

AWA KALU, Petitioner,

versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

- - - - - - - - - - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Administrative Record No. A29 574 173

- - - - - - - - - - August 28, 1996 Before KING, DUHÉ, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Awa Kalu filed a petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ final order of exclusion issued pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(C) and 1182 (a)(2)(A)(i)(II). The Immigration and Naturalization Service has filed a motion to dismiss Kalu’s petition for lack of jurisdiction, arguing that under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(b) an alien against whom a final order ofNo. 96-60245 - 2 - exclusion has been issued “may obtain judicial review of such order by habeas corpus proceedings and not otherwise.” “Any appeal from an exclusion proceeding . . . can only be brought by a habeas corpus petition to the district court.” Delgado-Carrera v. INS , 773 F.2d 629, 631 (5th Cir. 1985). Kalu’s petition for review is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Kalu’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. Kalu’s motions for release pending review, and summary judgment are DENIED as moot.
IFP MOTION DENIED; OTHER MOTIONS DENIED AS MOOT; PETITION DISMISSED.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

SALVATORE JOHN RUSSO

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2460

[ October 18, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for the

Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County ; Lawrence M. Mirman , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 432015CF000767AXMX

.

Salvatore John Russo, Stuart, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., G ROSS and K UNTZ , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.'s 333-87944 and 333-27973 of Weider Nutrition
International, Inc. on Forms S-8 of our report dated August 9, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Weider Nutrition
International, Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2002.

Our
audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the financial statement schedule of Weider Nutrition
International, Inc., listed in Item 14. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits. In
our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information
set forth therein.

DELOITTE &
TOUCHE LLP

Salt
Lake City, Utah
August 28, 2002

---

QuickLinks
4 

Order issued September 02 , 2012 

In The 

(Court of Apprats 

Bistrirt uf &rxasatDallas 

No. 05-12-00701-CV 

CITY OF DALLAS, Appellant 

V. 

FREDERICK SALYER, Appellee 

ORDER 

The Court has before it appellee's September 18, 2012 unopposed second motion for 

extension. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS appellee to file his brief by October 20, 

2012. No further extensions will be granted absent a showing of extraordinary circumstances. 

MOLLY F IS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
23.1




Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





Board of
Directors


NeoMedia
Technologies, Inc.







We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference to the previously filed Registration
Statements (File Nos. 333-110189 and 333-109778) of our report dated
April 14, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements of
NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008,
which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.










/s/
Kingery & Crouse, P.A.


Tampa,
Florida


April14, 2009
Process flow diagram for the use of the new chemical at sites controlled by submitter 

Processing of emulsion containing PMN substance with additives to make
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO					18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,					AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO					SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xinhua China Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Xianping Wang, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

> 
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and				(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: December 12, 2005                                                      /s/ Xianping Wang                                                                                                                    Xianping Wang, President,			                                                                                                Chief Executive Officer and 			                                                                                                Director

----
# C_2016291EN.01000102.xml

| 11.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8093 — EQT/Bilfinger Real Estate Solutions and Bilfinger Efficiency)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 291/02)

On 1 August 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8093. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8093. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
* The Honorable James D. Todd, Un ited States District Judge for the Western District of Tennessee, sitting by designation. -1- NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 05a0134n.06 Filed: February 18, 2005 No. 04-5159 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
LYDIA WISEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. WHAYNE SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

Before: NORRIS and GIBBONS, Circuit Judges; TODD, District Judge. *
PER CURIAM . Lydia Wiseman was employed as an environmental specialist at Whayne Supply Company (“Whayne Supply”) from October 1995 until December 2000. Wiseman filed a complaint alleging that Whayne Supply violated the Kentucky Civil Rights Act, Ky. Rev. Stat. Chapter 344, by discriminating against her on the basis of her sex and by creating a hostile work environment in the Jefferson County, Kentucky, Circuit Court on February 15, 2001. Whayne Supply removed the action to the United States Dist rict Court for the Western District of Kentucky on March 2, 2001. Whayne Supply subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment on May 15, 2003. The district court granted the motion on January 12, 2004.-2- Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having studied the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to Whayne Supply. Because the reasons for this determination have been fully articulated by the district court, the issuance of a detailed opinion by this court would be duplicative and would serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, we affirm the j udgment of the district court on the basis of the reasoning set out by that court in its opinion and order entered on January 12, 2004.
Unassociated Document


Exhibit 10.2


 
 



	 
GC Barnes Group, LLC







 




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties execute this Agreement as of the date set forth above.


 



	
RVPIus, Inc., Holding Company


of ECCO2 Tech


 


2500 Plaza 5 25th Floor 


Harborside Financial Center 


Jersey City, NJ 07311

	
GC BARNES GROUP, LLC


 


 


10 G Street NE Suite 710 


Washington, DC. 20002







 




	By:	/s/ Cary Lee Peterson	 	By:  	/s/ Greg Barnes	 
	Name:   	
Cary Lee Peterson

	 	 
Name:  

	
Greg Barnes

	 
	Title: 	
 
Chairman-CEO



	 	Title:	
Managing Member

	 
	Date:	 
21 April 2013

	 	Date:	
4-21-2013

	 







 


April 19, 2013


 


CONSULTANT AND ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT


Page 5 of 5


 


GC Barnes Group, LLC Proprietary and Confidential
EXHIBIT 31(a)

| |  |  |  | CERTIFICATION |  | OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
| |  |  |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I, Dr. Nafi Onat, chief executive officer of Star Energy Corporation (Registrant) certify that:

1.     I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (Report) of Registrant;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this Report;

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Registrant and have:

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared;

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2005

/s/ Dr. Nafi Onat

Dr. Nafi Onat

Chief Executive Officer

---
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S NO. WR-30,349-03 IN RE DAVID LEE COOPER, Re lator

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF M ANDAM US CAUSE NO. 1434976-A IN THE 232 DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Relator has f

iled a motion for leave to file an application for a wr it of mandamus pursuant to the orig inal jurisdiction of this Court. I n it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of habea s corpus in the 232nd District Court of Harris C ounty , that more than 35 day s have elapsed, and that the application has not y et been forwa rded to this Court. Relator contends that the district court order ed a response from trial co u n s el on J anuar y 25, 2019, but counsel has not complied. Additionally , the court has not enter ed an ODI or timel y fo rw ar d ed the habea s application to this Court. Respondent, the J udg e of the 232 District Court of Har ris County , shall file a response with n d2

this Court by having the District Clerk submit the rec ord on such habea s corpus application. I n the alternative, Respondent m ay obtain a response from trial counsel and then have the Dis trict Clerk submit the rec ord on such application. I n either case , Respondent’s answe r shall be submitt ed within 30 day s of the date of this order

. This application for leave to file a writ of mandamus will be held in abey ance until R espondent ha s submitt ed his response

.
Filed: Aug ust 21, 2019 Do not publish
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL15-53-000]

                    On March 16, 2015, the Commission issued an order in Docket Nos. EL15-53-000, and ER15-861-000 pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation to determine the justness and reasonableness of the Energy Imbalance Market provisions in the California Independent System Operator Corporation's existing tariff related to the imbalance energy price spikes in PacifiCorp's balancing authority areas.                     *California Independent System Operator Corporation*, 150 FERC ¶ 61,191 (2015). On March 17, 2015, the Commission issued a notice establishing a refund effective date.                

                    Any interested persons desiring to be heard in Docket No. EL15-53-000 should file a notice of intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate, in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214) by 5 p.m. ET on April 15, 2015. The Commission encourages electronic submission of interventions in lieu of paper using the “eFiling” link at                     *http://www.ferc.gov*. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original hard copy of the intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.                

Dated: March 26, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-07537 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE CODE 6717-01-P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3095 

To address Federal employees who comply with Executive Order 14043, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 28, 2021 

Ms. LUMMIS (for herself, Mr. MARSHALL, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Mr. ROUNDS, 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mrs. BLACKBURN, and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To address Federal employees who comply with Executive 

Order 14043, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Having Employees Re5 turn to Duty Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘HERD Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXECUTIVE ORDER 14043. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

8 (1) the terms ‘‘agency’’ and ‘‘employee’’ have 

9 the meanings given the terms in section 3 of the ExVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:43 Nov 01, 2021 Jkt 029200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3095.IS S3095

pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3095 IS

1 ecutive Order, except that the term ‘‘agency’’ does 

2 not include the Department of Defense; 

3 (2) the term ‘‘covered employee’’ means an em4 ployee who has complied with the requirements of 

5 the Executive Order; and 

6 (3) the term ‘‘Executive Order’’ means Execu7 tive Order 14043 (86 Fed. Reg. 50989; relating to 

8 requiring Coronavirus Disease 2019 vaccination for 

9 Federal employees). 

10 (b) REQUIREMENT.— 

11 (1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraphs (2) 

12 and (3), beginning on the date that is 60 days after 

13 the date of enactment of this Act, the head of each 

14 agency shall, with respect to each covered employee 

15 employed by the agency, require the covered em16 ployee to work from the duty station of the covered 

17 employee, and to work the hours worked by the cov18 ered employee, as of February 15, 2020. 

19 (2) NEWLY HIRED EMPLOYEES.—If a covered 

20 employee was not employed by the applicable agency 

21 as of February 15, 2020, the requirements under 

22 paragraph (1) shall apply to the covered employee 

23 with respect to the duty station and hours of the in24 dividual who occupied the position of the covered 

25 employee, as of that date. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 3095 IS

1 (3) SIGNIFICANT COMMUNITY SPREAD.—The 

2 head of an agency may implement different policies 

3 than, or supplemental policies to, the requirements 

4 under paragraph (1), including by requiring social 

5 distancing at a particular work site, if the agency 

6 head finds that— 

7 (A) there is substantial transmission of 

8 COVID–19 within a community in which the 

9 requirements of that paragraph would otherwise 

10 be carried out, as determined by the Centers for 

11 Disease Control and Prevention; and 

12 (B) implementing those different or sup13 plemental policies will not degrade the level of 

14 service that the agency provides to the public. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 CERTIFICATION OF CUSTODIAN
  
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Corporate Filing Services, Inc. , a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on 10-QSB for the June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Curtis Wade Fox , Sole Officer/Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:
  
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
 the Company.
  
 Dated August 14, 2003
  /s/Curtis Wade Fox
 Curtis Wade Fox
 Sole Officer/Director