alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
***Exhibit32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

** **

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of Montana Mining Corp. for the quarterly period ended September30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof, I, Ruairidh Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

 

Date: November 11, 2010

 

 

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant and willbe retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

** **

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2998 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2998

  To prohibit the Commissioner of Social Security and any officer or 
employee of the Social Security Administration from requiring that any 
 individual be vaccinated against COVID-19 as a condition of receiving 
      benefits under titles II or XVI of the Social Security Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 19, 2021

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Commissioner of Social Security and any officer or 
employee of the Social Security Administration from requiring that any 
 individual be vaccinated against COVID-19 as a condition of receiving 
      benefits under titles II or XVI of the Social Security Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING COVID-19 VACCINATION AS A CONDITION 
              OF RECEIVING SOCIAL SECURITY OR SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY 
              INCOME BENEFITS.

    Neither the Commissioner of Social Security nor any officer or 
employee of the Social Security Administration shall establish or 
enforce any requirement that an individual receive a COVID-19 vaccine 
as a condition of receiving a benefit under title II or XVI of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.; 1381 et seq.).
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 12.1

Guitar Center, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)

|                                                         |                       | Year Ended December 31,
|-------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- | -----------------------
|
|Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary loss |                       | 59,509                 
|                                                         | Add: Interest expense |                        
|                                                         |                       |                        
|                                                         |                       |                        
|                                                         |                       |                        
|Fixed charges:                                           |                       |                        
|                                                         |                       |                        
|                                                         |                       |                        
|                                                         |                       |                        
|                                                         |                       |                        
|Ratio of earnings fixed charges                          |                       | 3.5                    
|                                                         |                       |                        

---

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated March 2, 2015 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in Harmonic Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


San Jose, California


November 6, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-26-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,240
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,036
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                     53,676
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,788
<PP&E>                                          14,644
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,926
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   113,884
<SALES>                                        208,326
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          136,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   55,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 943
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,919
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.93
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0589. VICTOR B. HARRIS v. THE STATE.

In 2003, a jury found Victor Harris guilty of one count of aggravated child

molestation and two counts of child molestation. The trial court imposed a 20-year

prison term on the aggravated child molestation conviction, to be followed by

concurrent 10-year prison terms on the remaining convictions. We affirmed Harris’s

judgment of conviction in an unpublished opinion on direct appeal. Harris v. State,

No. A05A1280 (Sept. 22, 2005).

In July 2016, Harris filed a motion to correct an illegal and/or void sentence,

arguing that the trial court erred by failing to consider on the record whether to

exercise its discretion under OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (c) to impose sentences below the

mandatory minimums. The trial court denied Harris’s motion, and he filed this direct

appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

A direct appeal may lie from an order denying a motion to vacate or correct a

void sentence only if the defendant raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in

fact, void. See Harper v. State, 286 Ga. 216, 217, n. 1 (686 SE2d 786) (2009); Burg

v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 119 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). “Motions to vacate a void

sentence generally are limited to claims that – even assuming the existence and

validity of the conviction for which the sentence was imposed – the law does not

authorize thatsentence, most typically because it exceedsthe mostsevere punishment

for which the applicable penal statute provides.” von Thomas v. State, 293 Ga. 569,

572 (2) (748 SE2d 446) (2013). When a sentence is within the statutory range of

punishment, it is not void. Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004).

November 30, 2016
Here, Harris does not claim that his sentences fell outside the statutory range

of punishments.

1 Because Harris has not raised a valid void-sentence claim, we lack

jurisdiction to consider his appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See Burg, 297 Ga.

App. at 120.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

1

In any event, OCGA § 17-10-6.2 had not yet been enacted when Harris was

convicted and sentenced in 2003 and thus does not apply here. See Ga. L. 2006,

p. 379, § 21; Searcy v. State, 162 Ga. App. 695, 698 (2) (291 SE2d 557) (1982) (this

Court applies the sentencing law in effect at the time the crime was committed).

11/30/2016
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

June 5, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00246

- CV

Anselma RODRIGUEZ, Norma Rodriguez, Amadora R. Mariscal, Homero Rodriguez and Elisa R. Alaniz

, Appellant s

v.

Arturo RODRIGUEZ, Sant os R. Olmeda, Pablo Rodriguez, Jr., David Rodriguez, Elva R. Smith, Children of Alberto Rodriguez (deceased), Alberto Rodriguez, Jr., Nadia Rodriguez, and Manuel Rodriguez, Appellee s

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC

- 09

- 538 The Honorable Baldemar Garza, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

A ppellant’s brief was originally due to be filed on June 5, 2019

. On June 3, 2019, appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief until August 4, 2019

— an extension of sixty (60) days. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that appellant’s brief is due no later than Monday, August 5, 2019. Appell ant is advised that further requests for extension of time to file the brief will be disfavored.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN W ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 10.13 


 


FORFEITURE AGREEMENT


 


This Forfeiture Agreement (this “Agreement”)
is entered into as of October 12, 2021, by and between A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners (the “Transferor”) and Industrial
Human Capital, Inc. (the “Transferee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, the Transferor desires to transfer 450,000
shares (the “Shares”) of common stock of the Transferee back to the Transferee.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, for good and
valuable consideration which each party acknowledges the receipt of, hereby agree as follows:


 


		1.	Transfer of the Shares.



 


The Transferor hereby transfers to the Transferee
the Shares, and the Transferee hereby cancels the Shares.


 


		2.	Representations and Warranties of the Transferor.



 


The Transferor represents and warrants that it
has full legal capacity and authority to enter into the Agreement and to transfer the Shares to the Transferee hereunder, and is not bound
by any agreement, instrument or governmental order prohibiting such transfer. The Transferor also represents that it is transferring such
interests free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than those created by the terms of the Transferee’s organizational
documents or imposed by applicable federal and state securities laws.


 


		3.	Binding Effect.



 


This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and assigns.


 


		4.	Entire Agreement.



 


This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement
of the parties hereto.


 


		5.	Governing Law.



 


This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
the State of New York without regard to its conflict of laws principles.


 


		6.	Modification.



 


This Agreement may not be amended or supplemented
at any time unless by a writing executed by the parties hereto.


 


		7.	Headings.



 


The headings in this Agreement are solely for convenience
or reference and shall not affect its interpretation.


 






    1 


     


    

 


		8.	Counterparts; Facsimile.



 


This Agreement may be executed in any number of
counterparts, each of which when so executed shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together shall constitute one and
the same instrument. This Agreement or any counterpart may be executed via facsimile or other electronic transmission, and any such executed
facsimile or electronic copy shall be treated as an original.


 


[The balance of this page is intentionally
left page.]


 






    2 


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed
this Agreement as of the date first set forth above.


 


Transferor:


 


	 	A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:	                
	 	Name:
	 	Title:





 


Transferee:


 


	 	Industrial Human Capital, Inc.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By:	              
	 	Name: Scott W. Absher
	 	Title: Chief Executive Officer




 






    3
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 7807** 

THERL TAYLOR ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
CATHERINE AMASON, SCDC Mailroom Supervisor; MISHA MICHELLE, Mailroom Attendant; WAYNE THOMPSON, SCDC Lieutenant; A. SELLARS, SCDC Disciplinary Hearing Officer; D. SEWARD, SCDC Major; JEANNE MCKAY, SCDC Associate Warden; JANE DOES, Employee; JANE CHISUM, CO; JOHN EVRY, CO; CHRIS FLORIAN, SCDC Office of General Counsel Attorney; WILLIAM BYERS, SCDC Director ,
Defendant s
- Appellees ,
and

JON DOES, Inmate; SCDC ,
Defendants

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Richard Mark Gergel , District Judge. ( 2:13

- cv
- 03449

- RMG )

Submitted : April 21 , 2016 Decided: April 25, 2016

Before WILKINSON, KING , and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Therl Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Roy F. Laney, Thomas Lowndes Pope, Jayme Leigh Shy, Damon C. Wlodarczyk, RILEY, POPE & LANEY, LLC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Therl Taylor appeals the district court ’ s order accepting
the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (20 12 ) complaint , its order denying his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion, and the magistrate judge’s order
denying as moot his discovery motion . We have re viewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Taylor v. Amason , No.

2:13

- cv
- 03449

- RMG (D.S.C. Sept. 28, 2015; Oct. 14, 2015 ; Nov.

18, 2014 ) . We dispense with oral argument because th e facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 12.2  Section 302 Certification  I, Andrew Keating, certify that:  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Bank of Ireland;  2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:  (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b)Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  (c)Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (d)Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting;  5.The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.  Date: 28 March 2014Andrew KeatingName:
Andrew KeatingTitle:
Group Chief Financial OfficerBank of Ireland
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3012 

To provide a moratorium on all Federal research grants provided to any 

institution of higher education or other research institute that is conducting gain-of-function research. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 19, 2021 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. PAUL, Ms. ERNST, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mrs. 

BLACKBURN, Mr. HAGERTY, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. LANKFORD, Mr. RUBIO, 

Mr. COTTON, and Mr. WICKER) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide a moratorium on all Federal research grants 

provided to any institution of higher education or other 

research institute that is conducting gain-of-function research. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Viral Gain of Function 

5 Research Moratorium Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3012 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON FEDERAL RESEARCH GRANTS 

2 FOR INSTITUTIONS AND RESEARCH INSTI3 TUTES CONDUCTING GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RE4 SEARCH. 

5 (a) DEFINITION OF GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RE6 SEARCH.—In this section, the term ‘‘gain-of-function re7 search’’ means any research that— 

8 (1) may be reasonably anticipated to confer at9 tributes to influenza, MERS, or SARS viruses such 

10 that the virus would have enhanced pathogenicity or 

11 transmissibility in any organism; or 

12 (2) involves the enhancement of potential pan13 demic pathogens or related risky research with po14 tentially dangerous pathogens. 

15 (b) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding any other provi16 sion of law, no research grants supported by Federal funds 

17 may be awarded to institutions of higher education, or 

18 other research institutes, that are conducting gain-of-func19 tion research. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO				18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,				AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO				SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2006 of Xinhua China Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Xianping Wang, President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
- The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 			   			Dated: February 14, 2007                                                                /s/ Xianping Wang                                                                                                                               Xianping Wang, President, CEO			                                                                                                        and a Director