alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TNTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANASupremeCourtCauseNo.DA20-0518KARLKNUCHELKnuchel&Oden,P.C.101NorthEStreetP.O.Box953Livingston,MT59047Telephone:406/222-0135Email:karl@knuchelandoden.comATTORNEYFORRESPONDENT/APPELLANTTHERESACARBAH,))PetitionerandAppellee,)v.))ORDERFOREXTENSIONCHRISTOPHERCARBAH,)OFTIMETOFILEOPENING)BRIEF)RespondentandAppellant.))UPONreviewoftheUnopposedMotionforExtensionofTimetoFileOpeningBriefbycounselfortheRespondent/Appellanthereinandgoodcauseappearingtherefor,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatthetimetofileAppellant'sreplybriefisextendedtothe22nddayofJanuary,2021.DATEDthis22nddayofDecember,2020.12/28/2020Case Number: DA 20-0518JUSTICEOFTHESUPREMECOURTOFMONTANAcc:KarlKnuchelKirstenMullCoreElectronically signed by:Bowen GreenwoodClerk of the Supreme CourtDecember 28 2020
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 63 (Thursday, April 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17783]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07529]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--3d Pdf Consortium, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on February 23, 2015, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), 3D PDF Consortium, Inc. 
(``3D PDF'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Leslie Miller (individual member), Greenville, SC; and 
Olivier Rigolett (individual member), Lyon, FRANCE, have been added as 
parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and 3D PDF intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 27, 2012, 3D PDF filed its original notification pursuant 
to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a 
notice in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on 
April 20, 2012 (77 FR 23754).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on December 4, 
2014. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on January 5, 2015 (80 FR 260).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-07529 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2964 

To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 

National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2021 

Ms. BALDWIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and 

New England National Scenic Trails as units of the 

National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Scenic Trails 

5 Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

7 Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2964 IS

1 inserting ‘‘as a unit of the National Park System’’ before 

2 the period at the end. 

3 SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

4 Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act 

5 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third 

6 and fourth sentences and inserting ‘‘The trail shall be ad7 ministered by the Secretary of the Interior as a unit of 

8 the National Park System.’’. 

9 SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

10 Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act 

11 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence 

12 by inserting ‘‘as a unit of the National Park System,’’ 

13 after ‘‘administer the trail’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
#### O’Boyle v. Soundarajan

Before us is defendant’s motion for reconsideration of our order dated June 11, 1979, in which we dismissed a demurrer to the assumpsit count in plaintiffs complaint. Defendant argues that the count merely reiterates the allegations of the trespass count and should be dismissed as redundant.

Our attention is directed to Peterman v. Geisinger Medical Center, 8 D. & C. 3d 432 (Montour Co. 1978), in which assumpsit counts in a complaint alleging medical malpractice were dismissed on grounds that the gravamen of plaintiffs’ action was in tort. We find this holding unpersuasive and note that to dismiss plaintiffs assumpsit count at this time would be improper for the following reasons:

*730(1) It would violate § 102 of the Health Care Services Malpractice Act of October 15, 1975, P.L. 390, as amended, 40 P.S. §1301.102, which specifically authorizes actions for breach of contract: McKlveen v. Latrobe Area Hospital, 12 D. & C. 3d 712 (1979).

(2) It would improperly anticipate the evidence plaintiff might intend to offer at the arbitration hearing: Sacks v. Thomas Jefferson Hospital, opinion of Judge Takiff dated January 24, 1978, Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, no. 3160, July term, 1977;

(3) It would violate Pa.R.C.P. 1020(d)(3) by requiring plaintiff to elect his remedy in advance. See 2Goodrich-Amram 2d § 1020(d): 1, pps. 195 and 196.

Accordingly, the instant motion for reconsideration must be dismissed: Dillard v. St. Francis General Hospital, 124 Pitts. 235 (1976).

ORDER

And now, June 29, 1979, upon consideration of defendant’s motion for reconsideration filed June 15, 1979, it is hereby ordered and decreed that said motion is dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the          t
consolidated balance sheet and statements of operations of Phoenix Metal U.S.A.,
Inc., as of and for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         111,091
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     91,329
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               225,004
<PP&E>                                       1,132,194
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,177
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,069,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,935
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        18,385
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,255,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,069,342
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  326,949
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (339,224)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.002)


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 2266

JOSEPH CRUSSIAH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

GOVERNOR LAWRENCE HOGAN; MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND

,

Defendants

- Appell ees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Paula Xinis , District Judge. ( 8:21

- cv

- 02418

- PX )

Submitted : January 20, 2022 Decided: January 24, 2022

Before WILKINSON, DIAZ, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Joseph Crussiah, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-2266 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Joseph Crussiah appeals the district court’s order dismissing his c ivil complaint as

frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) . We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order . We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are ad equately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-2266 Doc: 6 Filed: 01/24/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2293 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2293

     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
 Assistance Act to provide certain employment rights to reservists of 
    the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2021

Mr. Peters (for himself and Mr. Portman) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
 Assistance Act to provide certain employment rights to reservists of 
    the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Civilian Reservist Emergency 
Workforce Act of 2021'' or the ``CREW Act''.

SEC. 2. PERSONNEL PERFORMING SERVICE RESPONDING TO PRESIDENTIALLY 
              DECLARED MAJOR DISASTERS AND EMERGENCIES.

    Section 306 of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 
Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5149) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(d) Personnel Performing Service Responding to Disasters and 
Emergencies.--
            ``(1) USERRA employment and reemployment rights.--The 
        Administrator shall, in a manner similar to the program 
        described in chapter 43 of title 38, United States Code, afford 
        protections, rights, benefits, and obligations to intermittent 
        personnel appointed pursuant to subsection (b)(1) to perform 
        service to the Federal Emergency Management Agency under 
        sections 401 and 501 or to train for such service.
            ``(2) Notice of absence from position of employment.--
        Preclusion of giving notice of service by necessity of service 
        under subsection (b)(1) to perform service to the Federal 
        Emergency Management Agency under sections 401 and 501 or to 
        train for such service shall be considered preclusion by 
        `military necessity' for purposes the protections, rights, 
        benefits, and obligations afforded under paragraph (1) 
        pertaining to giving notice of absence from a position of 
        employment. A determination of such necessity shall be made by 
        the Administrator and shall not be subject to review in any 
        judicial or administrative proceeding.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10(b)



 EXHIBIT 10(b) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of
Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 10, 2013, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, and (2) dated April 22, 2013,
with respect to the financial statements of the subaccounts of the WRL Series Annuity Account, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 18 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 333-82705) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related
WRL Freedom Premier®. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 

April 22, 2013
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2783 

To provide resettlement benefits for certain nationals of Afghanistan, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 

Mr. MERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide resettlement benefits for certain nationals of 

Afghanistan, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Welcoming Evacuees 

5 Coming from Overseas to Mitigate Effects of Displace6 ment Act of 2021’’ or the ‘‘WELCOMED Act of 2021’’. 

7 SEC. 2. RESETTLEMENT BENEFITS FOR AFGHAN EN8 TRANTS. 

9 (a) DEFINITION OF AFGHAN ENTRANT.—In this Act, 

10 the term ‘‘Afghan entrant’’ means a national of AfghaniVerDate Sep 11 2014 04:22 Sep 22, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2783.IS S2783

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2783 IS

1 stan (or in the case of an alien having no nationality, a 

2 person who last habitually resided in Afghanistan) who is 

3 paroled into the United States pursuant to section 

4 212(d)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

5 U.S.C. 1182(d)(5)) during the period beginning on July 

6 1, 2021, and ending on July 1, 2025. 

7 (b) RESETTLEMENT SUPPORT AUTHORIZED.—Not8 withstanding any other provision of law, an Afghan en9 trant shall be eligible for resettlement assistance (includ10 ing services for unaccompanied refugee minors) and any 

11 other Federal public benefit (as defined in section 401(c) 

12 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Reconciliation 

13 Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1611(c))) in the same manner as 

14 an alien admitted to the United States under section 207 

15 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1157). 

16 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

17 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 

18 necessary to carry out this section. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.3


 



 


 


Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm


We have issued our report
dated October 7, 2021, with respect to the financial statement of SmartTrust 536 contained in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-6 (File No. 333-258215) and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned report in the Registration Statement
and Prospectus, and to the use of our name as it appears under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm”.


 


/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


 


Chicago, Illinois


October 7, 2021
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of Cardima,  Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-K for the year  ending  December  31, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: May 5, 2006

/s/ Gabriel B. Vegh
--------------------
Gabriel B. Vegh
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Order entered November 28, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00496-CV

JAMES MARK DUNNE, Appellant

V.

BRINKER TEXAS, INC., CHILI'S BEVERAGE COMPANY, INC., AND BRINKER 

INTERNATIONAL PAYROLL COMPANY, L.P., D/B/A CHILI'S GRILL & BAR, AND 

LOIS AHLGRIM, Appellees

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13853

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ November 22, 2016 unopposed third motion for extension of 

time to file their brief and extend the time to DECEMBER 2, 2016. No further extensions will 

be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.7
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints George L. Lippe and William P. Leiser the true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him
and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998, and to sign any or all amendments to such
Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, each of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their
substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
                                       /s/ Robert E. Sulentic
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                           Robert E. Sulentic
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-47928) of Oplink Communications, Inc. of our
report dated August 26, 2004 relating to the financial statements of Oplink
Communications, Inc., which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated August 26, 2004 relating to the
financial statement schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
September 10, 2004
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: ARMANDO MADRID,

 Relator.

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-16-00292-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Armando Madrid, a Texas inmate, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus

against the Honorable Martin Muncy, Judge of the 109th District Court of Andrews County, 

Texas, alleging that Respondent has not ruled on a motion to recuse purportedly filed on 

August 5, 2016.

To obtain mandamus relief, Relator must demonstrate that he does not have an adequate 

remedy at law and that the act he seeks to compel is ministerial. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth 

Judicial District Court of Appeals, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). To be entitled 

to a writ of mandamus compelling a trial court to consider and rule on a properly filed motion, 

Relator must establish that the trial court: (1) had a legal duty to rule on the motion; (2) was 

asked to rule on the motion; and (3) failed or refused to rule on the motion within a reasonable 

time. In re Molina, 94 S.W.3d 885, 886 (Tex.App.--San Antonio 2003, orig. proceeding); see In 

re Layton, 257 S.W.3d 794, 795 (Tex.App.--Amarillo 2008, orig. proceeding). Relator has not 
- 2 -

presented sufficient evidence to establish he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the 

petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

December 7, 2016

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
Document

EXHIBIT 10.38




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC. EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2020


I.


Effective February 1, 2021, the Walgreen Co. 2011 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”) is discontinued as a separate plan, and the Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. Executive Retirement Savings Plan (the “ERSP”) is amended by adding the following Appendix A thereto, to incorporate the 2011 Plan into the ERSP:


“APPENDIX A


Effective February 1, 2021, this Appendix A covers the administration of remaining accounts under the Walgreen Co. 2011 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the “2011 Plan”), as follows:


1.ARTICLE VI – PLAN ACCOUNTING. These ERSP provisions covering Accounts and investments shall apply to all accounts previously maintained under the 2011 Plan (“2011 Plan Accounts”) in the same fashion as they apply to Employee Deferral Subaccounts under the Plan.


2.ARTICLE VII – PAYMENT OF BENEFITS. These Plan provisions covering payment of Accounts shall apply to 2011 Plan Accounts in the same fashion as they apply to Non-Grandfathered Accounts that are credited to Employee Deferral Subaccounts under Section 7.3(b) of the Plan.


3.ARTICLES VIII - X. These ERSP provisions shall apply to 2011 Plan Accounts, just as they apply to other Accounts under the Plan.”


II.


Effective retroactive to January 1, 2020 (to correct a drafting error in the Plan as restated as of that date), Section 6.2(c) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


“Investment Options. For purposes of this Section 6.2, “Investment Options” shall mean the investment funds offered under the Retirement Savings Plan from time to time, except
– with respect to the Employee Deferral Subaccounts – for any such funds investing primarily in Company stock.”
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1867 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 22 ) ll-B-7 6 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/2/20086:27:20AM

Sheet 22 of 95P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-B-7 6 

## PENDING CONFIDEN

Th e following informatio n i s locate d i n th e confidentia l file s o f th e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc h Triangl e Park , Nort hCarolin a 27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pending fina l determinatio n b yth e Administrato r an

d i s no t availabl e fo r publi c inspection . W . Floyd , Radia n Corporation , t o Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-19 , January1991 , HONNESHAP : Industry Characteristics/Ketene . 2 4 pages . CB I Documen t Contro l No . 86/23 , PPS-76 .