alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7216

ISAAC SHELDON BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department

of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (CA-03-227-AM)

Submitted: February 12, 2004 Decided: February 20, 2004

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Isaac Sheldon Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Isaac Sheldon Brown appeals from the denial of his 28

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition by the district court. An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding

unless a circuit judge or justice issues a certificate of

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(2000). This court will not

issue a certificate of appealability as to claims dismissed by a

district court on procedural grounds unless the movant can

demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial

of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its

procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 684 (4th Cir.

2001) (quoting Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have reviewed the record and determine that Brown has

not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537

U.S. 322, 336 (2003). Accordingly, we deny Brown’s motion for a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# CA2014432EN.01000101.xml

| 2.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 432/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 432/1

---

Call for competition for the selection of the T2S Board non-central bank members and the creation of a reserve list

Ref.: PRO-000373

(2014/C 432 A/01)

With this call for competition, the European Central Bank (ECB) is launching the process for the selection of the T2S Board non-central bank members and the creation of a reserve list.

1.   Background information

Background information

In line with the Treaty and the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, the Eurosystem will offer its T2S services to central securities depositories (CSDs) in Europe. The overall objective of T2S is to facilitate post-trading integration by supporting core, borderless and neutral pan-European cash and securities settlement in central bank money so that CSDs can provide their customers with harmonised and commoditised settlement services in an integrated technical environment with cross-border capabilities.

The T2S Board includes members who provide the perspective of the clients/users of T2S services without being associated with any specific client/user (i.e. non-central bank members). These members do not have a voting right.

The ECB organises this call for competition for the selection of non-central bank members for the T2S Board and the creation of a reserve list for their replacement.

2.   Place of performance of services

Place of performance of services

The place of provision of services is mainly at the ECB premises, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, and involves travel to other European locations.

3.   Type of procedure: call for competition

Type of procedure: call for competition

The ECB invites applications with a view to select two candidates as non-central bank members of the T2S Board and to create a reserve list for their replacement. The selection is solely based on the quality of the applications made.

The procedure shall be governed by Annex IV to Decision ECB/2012/6 of the European Central Bank of 29 March 2012 on the establishment of the TARGET2-Securities Board and repealing Decision ECB/2009/6 (1).

1

4.   Complete documentation

Complete documentation

The complete documentation (in English version) laying down, inter alia, the criteria for the inclusion on the list and the conditions for submission of applications can be downloaded from the ECB website under the following link:

Documentation for the call for competition:

Documentation for the call for competition:

http://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/t2s/progress/pdf/2014-11-05_call_for_expression_of_interest.pdf

T2S website: http://www.ecb.europa.eu/paym/t2s/about/spotlight/html/index.en.html

T2S website:

---

(1)  OJ L 117, 1.5.2012, p. 13.

1

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

James B. Bonham Corp., Appellant

No. 06-16-00026-CV v.

The City of Corsicana, Appellee

Appeal from the 13th District Court of 

Navarro County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 08-

17240-CV). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We further order that the appellant, James B. Bonham Corp., pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 29, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2719

ROGER PARSONS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KENNETH S. APFEL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. James P. Jones, District

Judge. (CA-97-251-B)

Submitted: May 13, 1999 Decided: May 18, 1999

Before WIDENER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Wolfe, WOLFE & FARMER, Norton, Virginia, for Appellant.

James A. Winn, Chief Counsel, Patricia M. Smith, Deputy Chief

Counsel, Nora R. Koch, Assistant Regional Counsel, Office of General Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Robert P. Crouch, United States Attorney, Alonzo H. Long,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Roger D. Parsons appeals from the district court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of disability

benefits. We have reviewed the briefs and administrative record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Parsons v. Apfel, No. CA-97-251-

B (W.D. Va., Oct. 1, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,578                     907
<SECURITIES>                                     4,270                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      308                      98
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (40)                    (30)
<INVENTORY>                                        532                     377
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   261                     229
<PP&E>                                           3,814                   2,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (1,326)                   (701)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,674                   3,964
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,300                   3,731
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                  17,453
<COMMON>                                        45,597                     595
<OTHER-SE>                                     (31,153)                (18,676)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,674                   3,964
<SALES>                                          1,261                     593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,261                     593
<CGS>                                            2,011                   1,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2011                   1,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,976                   7,009
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (148)                    (57)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,272)                 (7,754)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (12,272)                 (7,754)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (2.64)                  (2.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (2.64)                  (2.29)


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 29, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 29, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A2200. IRFAN MERCHANT v. WESTERN UNION FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18268]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07671]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Effective date April 3, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
March 27, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail 
Contract 121 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2015-43, CP2015-54.

Stanley F. Mires,
Attorney, Federal Requirements.
[FR Doc. 2015-07671 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: John Scherer v. Texas Coast Yachts, LLC and Fountaine Pajot, S.A.

Appellate case number: 01-20-00412-CV

Trial court case number: CV-0078309

Trial court: County Court at Law No. 2 of Galveston County

Appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Richard Hightower

Acting for the En Banc Court

En Banc Court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Kelly, Goodman, Landau, Hightower, 

Countiss, Rivas-Molloy, Guerra, and Farris.

Date: September 1, 2022
"h'ú1i4v 

L. KtÀÀot

Aw ?oll*tøw hh.,þroL OfflÂlt

Gnn.tr BnsrN UNrrrnD AIR Pol,l,uuoN CoNrnoL DrsrRrcr

L 5 7 S l^ârt S-tree*, Bí.1.1'oV, hll for n;n' q 3 5 L4 -3 53 7

ToL: 76O-872-82LL F*x¿ 76O-872-GLOq

May I1,2015

Jared Blumenfeld

Regional Administrator

EPA Region 9

75 Hawthorne Street

SanFrancisco, CA 94105

In accordance with 40 CFR Part 58.26, this letter certifies that the ambient air monitoring data for

the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control District (GBUAPCD) contained in the EPA Air

Quality System (AQS) as of May lI,2015 are accurate and complete for the calendar year 2014.

Both ambient concentration data and the quality assurance data have been completely submitted to

AQS. These data are accurate to the best of my knowledge taking into consideration the quality

asstnance findings for the calendar year 2074. A summary report generated by AQS would,

therefore, depict accurate sunìmary statistics for 2014. Both precision and accuracy data for all

GBUAPCD monitoring of criteria pollutants in2014 have also been submitted to AQS.

Attached are copies of the AQS Quick Look All Parameters Report (AMP450NC) and the Data

Certification Report (AMP600).

Air Pollution Control Off,rcer

Cc: (Via Email)

Matthew Lakin, USEPA Chief Air Quality Analysis Office

Fletcher Clover, USEPA Region 9 Air Quality Office

Meredith Kurpius, USEPA Region 9 Air Quality Offrce

David Lutz, USEPA Air Monitoring Group Data Certification Contact

Phillip
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50156

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER CHAD GAMMON,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-186-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Christopher Chad Gammon appeals his conviction and sentence for 

failing to register as a sex offender. Gammon has been released from prison 

but challenges the three-year term of supervised release that he is still serving.

Gammon first contends that the district court committed plain error by 

initially advising him that he faced a supervised release term of five years to 

life, when he actually faced a term of only one to three years. Any error did 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 28, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50156 Document: 00513774416 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2016
No. 16-50156

2

not affect Gammon’s substantial rights because there is no reasonable 

probability that the correct and more favorable information would have 

dissuaded him from pleading guilty. See United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 

542 U.S. 74, 83 (2004); United States v. Williams, 120 F.3d 575, 578 (5th Cir. 

1997).

Concerning the three-year term of supervised release, Gammon fails to 

show that the district court committed a procedural error by determining that 

Gammon was a Tier II sex offender. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 

(2007). Moreover, the sentence was within the properly calculated guideline 

range and is presumed to be reasonable. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 

551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). Gammon’s argument that we should adopt his 

assessment of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors is contrary to the 

deferential appellate review dictated by Gall and does not rebut the 

presumption of reasonableness. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; United States v. Ruiz, 

621 F.3d 390, 398 (5th Cir. 2010). 

The judgment is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-50156 Document: 00513774416 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2016
# C_2016338EN.01000101.xml

| 15.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8173 — CPPIB/OTPP/IDEAL/Arco Norte)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 338/01)

On 8 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8173. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8173. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 10.2

February 28, 2005
Mr. Paul E. Rubeli
Chairman of the Board and CEO
Aztar Corporation
2390 E. Camelback Road
Suite 400
Phoenix, Arizona  85016
Re:     409A Indemnification
Mr. Rubeli,
                        This Letter Agreement confirms the understanding between you and Aztar Corporation (the "Company") that, in the event that you incur any tax (the "409A Tax") under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code with respect to amounts paid or to be paid to you under the Aztar Corporation Nonqualified Retirement Plan for Senior Executives ("Plan IV") and pursuant to your individual deferred compensation agreement with the Company, dated December 1, 1983 (the "Deferred Compensation Agreement"), the Company shall pay to you an additional amount (the "Gross-Up Payment") such that the net amount of the Gross-Up payment retained by you, after payment of all applicable taxes thereon, will be equal to the amount of such 409A Tax.
                        The indemnification provided to you pursuant to this Letter Agreement is contingent upon (i) your receiving payments under Plan IV in a lump sum that does not include benefits for your service in 2005 and (ii) your benefits under the Deferred Compensation Agreement being paid to you according to the schedule previously provided to you by the Company.
                        If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please execute this Letter Agreement as provided below and return one copy to Robert Haddock at the Company.
AZTAR CORPORATIONROBERT M. HADDOCK
By:  Robert M. Haddock
Title:  President and Chief Financial Officer
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:PAUL E. RUBELI     February 28, 2005
Paul E. Rubeli                            Date
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending July 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"),
I, John Glazik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
     and

         2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  January 18, 2005                    /s/ John Glazik
                                            --------------------
                                            Name   John Glazik
                                            Title  CEO
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TacAsset Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 3, 2006