alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent, <br><br>against<br><br>John Anderson, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Michelle A. Armstrong, J.), rendered January 17, 2014. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal trespass in the third degree. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]) seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>; <i>Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>Elliot, J.P., Pesce and Aliotta, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: November 28, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
### Government

- to Government Consultations

Date: July 18, 2014

Time: 9:00

– 3:30 pm (Mountain Time Zone)

Where: EPA Region 8 Office, Denver, CO

Attendees: EPA R8 Tribes (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY);

EPA Region 8 Staff ; EPA Headquarters Staff

Email notifications were sent to the Region 8 Tribes listed below and to Rollie Wilson,

Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP

– Attorney for MHA Nation (Three Affiliated Tribes). Rollie

also forwarded the consultation notification to their list of “energy” trib es.

Region 8 Tribes

1 Blackfeet Nation MT

2 Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe SD

3 Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes MT

4 Crow Creek Sioux Tribe SD

5 Crow Nation MT

6 Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe SD

7 Fort Belknap Reservation

– Gros Ventre Tribe and Assiniboine Tribe MT

8 Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes MT

9 Lower Brule Sioux Tribe SD

10 MHA Nation

– Three Affiliated Tribes ND

11 Northern Cheyenne Tribe MT

12 Northwest Band of Shoshone Nation UT

13 Oglala Sioux Tribe SD

14 Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah UT

15 Rosebud Sioux Tribe SD

16 Sisseton Wahpeton Sioux SD/ND

17 Southern Ute Indian Tribe CO

18 Spirit Lake Tribe CO

19 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe ND

20 The Chippewa Cree Tribe MT

21 The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa ND

22 Ute Indian Tribe UT

23 Ute Mountain Ute Tribe CO

24 Wind River Reservation

– Northern Arapaho Tribe and Eastern Shoshone WY

25 Yankton Sioux Tribe SD
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS

Peter Leparulo, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of
Novatel Wireless, Inc. (the Company), and Kenneth Leddon, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2010 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and the results of operations of the Company for the
period covered by the Annual Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned have set their hands
hereto as of the 16thday of March, 2011.



/S/    PETER
LEPARULOPeter LeparuloChairman and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/S/    KENNETH
LEDDONKenneth LeddonSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
February Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

February 9, 2022
Special Note

February 9, 2022

Temperatures fell below freezing in Florida January 28-January 30. The full impact 

on the citrus crops in Florida may not be fully reflected in this report. The March 

Crop Production report will include the next update on citrus crops.
Data Sources

February 9, 2022

Objective Measurement

Florida Citrus

Row Count

Florida Citrus

Utilization Florida Citrus Administrative Committee

Data Quantity of Fruit Packed or Processed

Field Surveys

1,564 Groves January 10-24

114,782 Rows January 25-26
February 9, 2022

February 2022 Citrus

Utilized Production

All Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↓ 1.1

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 12.4

Non-Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 12.2

Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↓ 2.9

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 12.6

Grapefruit

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 11.3

Lemons

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 10.4

Tangerines

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 24.7

878

3,879

2,361

1,518

378

976

Production

(1,000 Tons)

11.07

9.37 9.03 8.73

7.70

6.08

8.14 7.85

6.90

6.11

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Million Tons

All Citrus Production

United States

8.27

6.77

6.35 6.09

5.09

3.88

5.43 5.25

4.43

3.88

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022

Million Tons

All Orange Production

United States
February 9, 2022

2021 Field Crops

Acreage, Yield, and Production

Unit Unit

Sugarcane Ton Ton

% Change from Previous Estimate N/A ↓ 0.3 ↑ 1.7 ↑ 1.3

% Change from Previous Season N/A ↓ 1.4 ↓ 6.0 ↓ 7.3

Production

(1,000 Units)

N/A 935 35.8 33,461

Yield

(Units per Acre)

Harvested

(1,000 Acres)

Planted

(1,000 Acres)
Selected Upcoming Reports

February 9, 2022

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/index.php

February 16 Vegetables - Annual

February 17 National Hemp Report

February 18 Farms and Land in Farms

February 24 County Estimates: Corn, Sorghum, Soybeans

Crop Values

Februray 25 Cattle on Feed

February 28 Agricultural Prices

Cotton System - Monthly & Annual

Fats and Oils - Monthly & Annual

Grain Crushings - Monthly & Annual

March 3 County Estimates: Rice

Cotton Ginnings

Crop Production

March 1

March 9
USDA AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK FORUM

February 9, 2022

Register Today

https://www.usda.gov/oce/ag-outlook-forum
#StatChat

February 9, 2022
#StatChat

February 9, 2022
All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

(202) 720-2127

(800) 727-9540

nass@usda.gov
**EXHIBIT 32.1****(1)**

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Joshua Pickus, thechief executive officer of SupportSoft, Inc. (the “Company”), certify for thepurposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Codethat, to the best of my knowledge,

(i)                            theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2007 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(ii)                        theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 2, 2007 |       |                                       |
|----------------------|------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                 |       |                                       |
|                 |       | /s/ JOSHUA  PICKUS                         |
|                 | ** ** | **Joshua  Pickus**                         |
|                 | ** ** | **Chief  Executive Officer and President** |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided toSupportSoft, Inc. and will be retained by SupportSoft, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----

(1)                  The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 isnot deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference intoany filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof andirrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing,except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it byreference.

----
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 09-1699

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the Northern

* District of Iowa.

Noel Perez-Plascencia, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 4, 2010

Filed: January 14, 2010

___________

Before MURPHY, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to a written plea agreement, Noel Perez-Plascencia (Perez) pleaded

guilty to being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§

922(g)(5) and 924(a)(2). The district court1

 sentenced him to 57 months in prison and

3 years of supervised release, and he appeals. His counsel has filed a brief under

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that a special condition of

supervised release limiting Perez’s association with gang members violates his

constitutional right to freedom of association. 

1

The Honorable Linda R. Reade, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Northern District of Iowa. 
Perez’s plea agreement contains an appeal waiver which we will enforce,

because the record shows that he entered into the plea agreement and appeal waiver

knowingly and voluntarily, and we conclude that enforcement of the appeal waiver

would not result in a miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886,

889-92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc). Although the appeal waiver does not cover

counsel’s argument--Perez reserved the right to appeal an “unconstitutionally

defective” sentence--we do not address the argument, because Perez will not be

subject to the condition until he is released from prison and is likely to be removed

from the country upon completion of his sentence. See United States v. Thomas, 198

F.3d 1063, 1064-65 (8th Cir. 1999) (appellate court will decline to determine

constitutional question if it is so premature that court would have to speculate as to

presence of real injury). 

Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75

(1988), to the extent required after enforcing the appeal waiver, we find no

nonfrivolous issues that are not encompassed by the waiver. Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal. 

______________________________

-2-
#### Commonwealth v. Pless

May 27, 1982

*Barry Gross,*assistant district attorney for Commonwealth.

*Joseph E. Hagan,*for defendant.

KELLY, *J.,*

On August 28, 1981, defendant, Gregory Pless, was found guilty of robbery, theft by unlawful taking or disposition, and simple assault. Subsequently he filed post-trial motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial.

In his brief in support of these post-trial motions, defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant the challenge for cause of a potential juror made by defendant. Defendant alleges that because the challenge for cause was not granted he was forced to use one of his peremptory challenges *476on this juror. Defendant claims that because of the cumulative effect of three facts about the juror: (1) the Folcroft Chief of Police was a relative, (2) a cousin was recently a victim of crime and (3) her mother was on a jury which heard another of defendant’s cases in the previous two days, the juror should have been stricken from the jury for cause.*

The Superior Court has stated that there are two situations in which potential jurors should be kept off the jury:

> “(1) when the potential juror has such a close relationship, be it familial, financial or situational, with parties, counsel, victims or witnesses, that the court will presume the likelihood of prejudice; and (2) when the potential juror’s likelihood of prejudice is exhibited by his conduct and answers to questions at *voir dire.”*

Commonwealth v. Colon, 223 Pa. Super. 202, 205-06, 229 A.2d 326, 327 (1972).

The facts alleged about the juror stricken in this case do not rise to the level that would have required the trial court to have removed the potential juror for cause. See also, Commonwealth v. Yohn, 271 Pa. Super. 537, 540-41, 414 A.2d 383, 385 (1979).

Other contentions made by defendant are without merit.

For all of the above reasons defendant’s motions in arrest of judgment and for a new trial are denied.

*

 This issue was not raised in any way at trial.
Exhibit 21 

 

**Subsidiaries of Firearms Training Systems, Inc.**

 

The Company has one wholly owned subsidiary, FATS, Inc., which is the operating subsidiary (the Operating Subsidiary). As of March 31, 2004, FATS, Inc.had six wholly owned subsidiaries: Firearms Training Systems Limited, which is based in the United Kingdom; F.A.T.S. Singapore Pte, Ltd.; Firearms Training Systems Netherlands, B.V.; FATS Canada, Inc., which is based in Montreal, Canada (Canada);FATS Canada Holdings, Inc. and Firearms Training Systems Australia Pty Ltd. On April 1, 2004, FATS Canada, Inc. and FATS Canada Holdings, Inc. completed an amalgamation under Section 185 of the *Canada Business Corporations Act* with FATSCanada, Inc. continuing as the amalgamated corporation.
# C_2016003EN.01000301.xml

| 7.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 January 2016

(2016/C 3/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0742 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4603 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2330 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0846 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6225 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,026 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,81 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3374 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5224 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2315 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5187 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5137 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3271 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6166 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5409 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 289,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0032 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0388 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6405 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 988,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7388 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,588 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 79,9893 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,917 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3331 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7480 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,8242 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0742

JPY

Japanese yen

127,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4603

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73440

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2330

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0846

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6225

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,026

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,81

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3374

RON

Romanian leu

4,5224

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2315

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5187

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5137

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3271

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6166

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5409

KRW

South Korean won

1 289,20

ZAR

South African rand

17,0032

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0388

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6405

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 988,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7388

PHP

Philippine peso

50,588

RUB

Russian rouble

79,9893

THB

Thai baht

38,917

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3331

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7480

INR

Indian rupee

71,8242

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### NUMBER 13

- 11

- 00 082

- CR



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ VICTOR AMAYA RIOS , Appellant,

v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 36 th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and P erkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, Victor Amaya Rios , was convicted of bail jumping. A ppellant filed a pro

se notice of appeal and on August 18, 2011, appointed counsel filed a motion to dismiss

the appeal. Counsel advised this Court that the appellant did not wish to proceed with

his appeal, but was unwilling to sign the motion to dismiss. On August 25, 2011, this2

Court denied the motion to dismiss because it did not contain the appellant’s signature

and abated the appeal with instruct ions to the trial court to make findings as to whether

the appellant had abandoned h is appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.2 (a).

Based on the trial court hearing, the trial court judge found that appellant does not

desire to prosecute the appeal. A lthough no written motion has been filed in compliance

with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, based upon the evidence at

the hearing that appellant does not want to continue h is appeal, we conclude that good

cause exists to suspend th e operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 2.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

P ER CURIAM

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

D elivered and filed the 29th d ay of September , 20 11

.
<PAGE> 1
==================================================================
                             =========
                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                       WASHINGTON, DC 20549
                          ---------------

                             FORM 8-K

          CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D)
              OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                      -----------------------

                         DECEMBER 15, 1999

         Date of report (Date of earliest event reported)

                     ------------------------

                  Commission File Number: 0-18108

                     ------------------------

                          FINET.COM, INC.
       Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                             DELAWARE
                     (State or jurisdiction of
                  incorporation or organization)

                   2527 CAMINO RAMON, SUITE 200
                        SAN RAMON, CA 94583
              (Address of principal executive office)

                            94-3115180
               (IRS Employer Identification Number)

                 Telephone Number: (925) 242-6550
       (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)



==================================================================
                            ==========

<PAGE> 2


ITEM 5. OTHER EVENTS

On December 15, 1999, the Company announced the retirement of Mark
Korell as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director effective
January 15, 2000. A copy of the press release is attached as
Exhibit 99.1.



ITEM 7. EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT  99.1   Press Release dated December 15, 1999 entitled
"FiNet.com Announces Retirement of Chief Executive Officer - Board
of Directors Names Interim CEO"


PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934, THE REGISTRANT HAS DULY CAUSED THIS REPORT TO BE SIGNED ON
ITS BEHALF BY THE UNDERSIGNED, THEREUNTO DULY AUTHORIZED.

FINET.COM, INC.

<TABLE>
<S>                                     <C>
Date: December 29, 1999                  /s/       GARY A. PALMER
                                         -------------------------
-----------
                                         GARY A. PALMER
                                        (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER)
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AS OF AND FOR THE
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA).
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          12,338
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,722
<PP&E>                                           1,080
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (477)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,843
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,021
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,813
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,843
<SALES>                                          2,481
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,481
<CGS>                                               44
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,274
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,305)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,305)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,305)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)


</TABLE>