alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1(1)

STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350

I, Joshua Pickus, the chief executive officer of SupportSoft, Inc. (the Company), certify for the purposes of section
1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code that, to the best of my knowledge,



|(i) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: November 6, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/ JOSHUA PICKUS                    
|                       |  |  |  | Joshua Pickus                        
|                       |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President

A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided to
SupportSoft, Inc. and will be retained by SupportSoft, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|(1) | The material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 is not deemed
filed with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof
and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. In addition, the material contained in this Exhibit 32.1 shall not be deemed to
constitute a part of the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# C_2016348EN.01001101.xml

| 23.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 September 2016

(2016/C 348/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1238 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4543 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85925 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5833 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0867 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1073 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,37 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2852 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4498 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3153 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4674 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4623 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7157 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5341 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5221 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 238,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1567 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4949 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5055 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 691,06 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6156 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,806 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,5987 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,951 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5940 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 22,0510 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,8720 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1238

JPY

Japanese yen

113,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4543

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85925

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5833

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0867

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1073

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,37

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2852

RON

Romanian leu

4,4498

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3153

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4674

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4623

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7157

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5341

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5221

KRW

South Korean won

1 238,31

ZAR

South African rand

15,1567

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4949

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5055

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 691,06

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6156

PHP

Philippine peso

53,806

RUB

Russian rouble

71,5987

THB

Thai baht

38,951

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5940

MXN

Mexican peso

22,0510

INR

Indian rupee

74,8720

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenu e, S.E. Washington , D C 2059 0 Mr. Mark W. Atwood C o ze n 

### 0' Connor 162 7 I S t. , NW, Ste. 1100 Washington , D.C. 2 0006 I ss ue date: October 17 , 20 14 Authority ex pir es: D ece mber 2 , 20 14



# r , Office ofl nte m ationa l Aviat ion CORRECTED COPY 1 NOTICE OF CONSISTENCY Kalitta Air, L.L.C. i s a properly certificated carr i er that holds a uth o rity to cond uct c harter ope ra tion s to and from C hin a . Based on a proposal s ubmitted by the carrier , we h ave determ in ed tha t th e operati ons co mpl y w ith the app lic abl e Department r egu lations and the provision s of the 2014

- 20 15 U.S.-C hina Protoco l. N umb er of F lights: five (5) o ne - way chart er s2 Flight Date(s): Nove mb er l- 2, 8-9 , 1 5 -1 6 ,22 -23 , and 29-3 0 ,20 14 Points: S han g hai (P VG ) - Anchorage (ANC*)

- C hi cago (ORD) E quipm en t: Boein g 747-200 or -400 The U
. S. carrier opera tin g the above charter fli g ht s h o uld rep ort , in writing , to the U
. S. Air Carrier Licen s ing Divi s ion ( X-44 ), Office ofl ntemational Av i ation , Department of Transportation , on it s operat io n for th e prece di ng month b y the tenth o f eac h month whe th er the flights opera te d. This notice i s valid o nl y for the flight containe d in th e above pro gram. 

## * Denote s techni cal s top o nl y. An e l ec troni c v e r s i o n of th i s documen t i s availab l e o n th e W o rld Wid e W eb a t : www. reg u la /

i o ns. gov

1 On October 16 , 2 014 , th e Department i ss u ed a Notice of Con s is te n c y w ith Eq uipment of Bo ei n g 7 47-400 , wh i c h we have corrected to Boein g7 47

- 2 00 o r -400 at th e reque s t of the carrier. 2 Fo ll ow in g o ur g ra nt of Ka l itta Ai r L.L.C. 's req u es t for fiv e (5) on e -way c harter a ll ocati on , 46 on e -w ay c h arter a ll ocations rema in avai l ab l e in th e Zone I c harter poo l for th e 2 0 ! 4/15 charte r yea r .
# Support Documents for

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on

Premanufacture Notice (PMN)

P-00-1108

EPA Docket EPA

- HQ

- OPPT -2011-0577

# Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for

PMN P -00-1108

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for

PMN P -00-1108

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for

PMN P -00-1108

# A-001

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P -00-1108

### STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 08/22/00

CASE NUMBER: P00-1108

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 1-2 3

KEYWORDS: LIVER THYROID

MUTA DEVEL

SENS-L,S

AQUATOX

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE: Liquid

LogKow = 2.47(M); S (mg/L, 25 E C) = 0.238(M); H = 4.09E-3(E)

MP (C) < 20(E); BP (C) = 386( ) based on 217 E C @ 4mm(M);

VP @ 25C (mm) = 1.8E-6(M)

LogKoc = 4.20(E); LogBCF = 1.20(E);

POTW removal (%) = 90 via biodeg;

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

PBT Potential: P1B1T1

Hydrolysis Halflife $ mo for epoxide

Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate - strong

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow - moderate

Volatilization Halflife Rivers = 12 da; Lake (da) = 140

Atmospheric Oxidation (halflife, hrs) OH = 4.7

HEALTH: Expect poor absorption via all routes (pchem); expect

some ester hydrolysis. Concern for liver and thyroid toxicity

based on submitted test data; mutagenicity based on test data for

an analogue ( positive for chromosome aberrations in bone

marrow of rats at 2100 mg/kg but not 1050 mg/kg); respiratory and

dermal sensitization from the epoxide; and developmental toxicity

based on the 2-ethylhexanol hydrolysis product and the effects on

the thyroid.

*CEB HEALTH: Low moderate concern (Dermal, inhalation)

Test data: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-)

E. coli with and without activation; (-) for chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes; rat oral LD

50 

### >1000 mg/kg, 1 death at

1000 mg/kg, liver and thyroid effects

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L

(ppm) are:

### fish 96-h LC50 = * P

fish (RT) 96-h LC50 = * M SR,N

daphnid 48-h LC50 = * P

daphnid 48-h LC50 = * M S,N

green algal 96-h EC50 = 0.030 or * P

green algal 72-h EC50 = * M S,N

fish chronic value = 0.008 P

daphnid ChV = 0.005 P

algal ChV = 0.030 or * P

algal ChV = * M S,N

Predictions are based on SARs for epoxides; SAR chemical class =

; MW411; log Kow = 6.2 (ClogP), 7.3 (SRC),

2.47 (M); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0

mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

high concern;

assessment factor = 10.0

concern concentration = 0.001

*CEB ECOTOX: All releases to water

SAT Co-chair: Leonard Keifer 260-1548

# A-002

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P -00-1108

# A-003

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P -00-1108
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION DERIVED FROM THE QUARTERLY
REPORT ON FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           9,159
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          10,448
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                16,881
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     49,267
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           3,255
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             3,255
<LOANS>                                        222,370
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,852
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,935
<DEPOSITS>                                     255,421
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,675
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,198
<LONG-TERM>                                     19,847
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,053
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,741
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 324,935
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,081
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,236
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   943
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                17,260
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,722
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,803
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,457
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      360
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,976
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,707
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,707
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,334
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.09
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.03
<LOANS-NON>                                        407
<LOANS-PAST>                                       408
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,343
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       28
<RECOVERIES>                                       177
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,852
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,764
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,088


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 21.1


                      BRILLIANT DIGITAL ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

               1.   Brilliant Interactive Ideas Pty. Ltd., an Australian
                    corporation.
               2.   Brilliant Digital Entertainment Pty. Ltd., an Australian
                    corporation.
               3.   B3D, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
               4.   Brilliant Studios, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
               5.   Digital Hip Hop, Inc.*
               6.   Altnet, Inc., a Delaware corporation.**


               *    Brilliant Digital Entertainment, Inc. owns seventy-five
                    percent (75%) of the outstanding shares of this corporation.

               **   Brilliant Digital Entertainment, Inc. owns fifty-one percent
                    (51%) of the outstanding shares of this corporation.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-6349

ANTIONE A. WEST, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus THOMAS CORCORAN; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-97-2280-WMN) Submitted: August 4, 1998 Decided: August 25, 1998 Before ERVIN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Antione A. West, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Annabelle Louise Lisic, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Antione A. West seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See West v. Corcoran , No. CA-97-2280- WMN (D. Md. Feb. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Wilson’s Estate.

*Executors*— Counsel *performing duties of executor*— Fees.

1. Where an estate was much involved and required the constant attention of counsel, who *performed many of the*functions *of*the executor, greatly to the benefit of the estate, counsel may be compensated for services not strictly professional.

*Commissions*— Executor *dying before completing administration.*

2. When a deceased executor had partially administered the estate with the assistance of counsel, his estate was allowed commissions at less than the full rate of 5 per cent.

Exceptions to adjudication. O. C. Phila. Co., Jan. T., 1914, No. 646.

*Samuel J. Taylor,*for exceptions.

*Daniel A. Stewart*and *F. J. Shoyer,*contra.

Nov. 18, 1921.

Henderson, J.,

The record in this estate discloses an unusual state of affairs, in that the estate of the deceased accountant has been allowed full commission at 5 per cent, when he did not complete the administration nor make any distribution under the will. Indeed, it is difficult to determine from the record just what he did do.

The estate was very involved, it needed the constant advice of counsel, it needed sound business judgment, and it would be extremely difficult to draw a line and say where the legal assistance began and ended. From the testimony it appears that counsel practically performed the functions of the executor, and the estate has greatly benefited therefrom. We are not prepared to say when the estate has profited from such services beyond those strictly legal in character, that counsel may not be compensated therefor. See Knight’s Estate, 20 Dist. R. 788; Lancaster’s Estate, 14 Phila. 237, and Parry’s Estate, 188 Pa. 38.

The record is remitted to the learned auditing judge with his consent, to take further testimony as to what services were performed by the deceased executor and consider what commissions should be allowed to his estate in view thereof, and in view of the fact that he did not complete the administration, also to consider what the compensation of counsel should be, taking into consideration such services beyond those strictly legal in character, as have benefited the estate.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jerome R Mahoney, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge and belief, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        Date: November 19, 2008

                                        By /s/ Jerome R Mahoney
                                        ------------------------------
                                        Jerome R Mahoney
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Principal Financial Officer
**Exhibit 13.2****Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 906 Certification**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of The Governor and Company of the Bank ofIreland, a chartered corporation incorporated under the laws of Ireland (“Bank of Ireland”), herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that Bank of Ireland’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for theyear ended 31 March 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or §15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof Bank of Ireland.       Date: July 24, 2007          /s/ John P. O’Donovan      Name:
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00262-CR

EX PARTE JOHN TIMOTHY BRANTLEY

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16-0339A

ORDER

On August 8, 2016, John Timothy Brantley filed a notice of appeal challenging the 

trial court’s August 1, 2016 denial of his application for writ of habeas corpus. On 

September 1, 2016, we informed Appellant, the trial court, and the trial court clerk that 

the record does not contain a certification of his right of appeal and requested that the 

certification to be filed in a Supplemental Clerk’s Record within thirty days. This Court 

has not received the certification of Appellant’s right to appeal.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) provides that:

If the defendant is the appellant, the record must include the trial court’s 

certification of the defendant’s right of appeal under Rule 25.2(a)(2). The 

certification shall include a notice that the defendant has been informed of 
Ex parte Brantley Page 2

[her] rights concerning an appeal, as well as any right to file a pro se petition 

for discretionary review. This notification shall be signed by the defendant, 

with a copy given to him. The certification should be part of the record 

when notice is filed, but may be added by timely amendment or 

supplementation under this rule or Rule 34.5(c)(1) or Rule 37.1 or by order 

of the appellate court under Rule 34.5(c)(2). 

TEX. R. APP P. 25.2(d) (emphasis added). 

Pursuant to Cortez v. State, under Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1, if the trialcourt clerk does not file the certification after notice from the appellate clerk, as was the 

case here, the appellate clerk "must refer the matter to the appellate court, which will 

make an appropriate order under this rule or Rule 34.5(c)(2)." Cortez v. State, 420 S.W.3d 

803, 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). Consequently, we abate the appeal and remand the cause 

to the trial court for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court may utilize whatever 

means its finds necessary to secure and file with this Court a certificate of right of appeal 

that complies with Rule 25.2(d), including the requirement that it indicate appellant’s 

appellate rights and that it be signed by appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). Once 

properly completed and executed, the certification shall be included in a Supplemental 

Clerk’s Record. See id. at R. 34.5(a)(12). The trial court shall cause the Supplemental 

Clerk’s Record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court within forty-two days of the date 

of this order.

PER CURIAM
Ex parte Brantley Page 3

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed December 7, 2016

Do not publish 

[CR25]