alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rajesh Raniga, Chief Financial Officer of EYI Industries, Inc. (the
"Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

      (i)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal
            quarter ended June 30, 2005, and to which this certification is
            attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "Report") fully complies with the
            requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
            Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                        By:
                                            /s/ Rajesh Raniga
                                            ------------------------------------
                        Name:               Rajesh Raniga

                        Title:              Chief Financial Officer

                        Date:               August  19, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not
deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after
the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L UI S MANU E L OC HO A- C ON T R E R AS an dMAR I S OL OC HO A, P et i t i o n ers, v. E R I C H . H O L D E R , J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 08- 75014 A ge nc yN os . A 096- 071- 364

A 096- 071- 363 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r13, 2010 ** B e f o r e : S I L V E R M A N , C A L L A H A N , an dN .R . S M I T H , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . L ui s M anue l O c hoa - C ontr e r a s a nd M ar i s ol O c hoa , na t i ve s a nd c i t i z e ns of M exi co, pet i t i on for r evi ew of the B oard of Im m i grat i on A pp ea l s’ (“ B IA ”) order d e n y in g th e irm o tio n to r e o p e n . O u rju r is d ic tio n is g o v e rn e db y8 U .S .C . § 1 2 5 2 . W e r e v ie w f

o rab u s e o f

d is c r e tio n th e d e n ia l o f am o tio n to r e o p e n , Cano-Me r i da



# FI LED SEP 29 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS08- 75014 2 v . I NS , 3 1 1 F . 3 d9 6 0 , 9 6 4 (9 th C i r. 2 0 0 2 ), an dd e n o v o cl ai m s o f du e p ro cess v i o l at i o n s, To rr es -Ag u i la rv . I NS , 246 F . 3d 1267, 1271 ( 9th C i r . 2001) . W e de ny th e p e titio n f

o rr e v ie w . T h e B I A d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in d e n y in g p e titio n e r s ’ m o tio n to r e ope n be c aus e the B I A c ons i de r e d the e vi de nc e of pe t i t i one r s ’ U . S . c i t i z e n s on an dd au g h te r ’s m e d ic a l c o n d itio n s a n da c te dw ith in its b r o a dd is c r e tio n in d e te rm in in g th a t th e e v id e n c e w a s in s u f f ic ie n t to e s tab lis h p r im af a c ie e lig ib ility f o rc an c e lla tio n o f

r e m o v a l. Se e S i n gh v . I NS , 295 F . 3d 1037, 1039 ( 9th C i r . 2002) (B IA ’ s d en i al o f a m o t i o n t o reo p en sh al l b e rev ersedo n l y i f i ti s “ arb i trary, irr a tio n a l, o rc o n tr aryto law ” ) . P e titio n e r s ’ c o n te n tio n th a t th e B I A f a ile dto c ons i de rthe c um ul a t i ve i m pa c tof the i rhar ds hi p e vi de nc e f a i l s be c aus e i ti s not s upport e d bythe r e c or d. P E T I T I ON F OR RE V I E W DE NI E D.
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of PLX Technology, Inc.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of
  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of Moventis Capital,
  Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2006, Blake Ponuick,
  the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with
  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in
  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: May 19, 2006 | /s/ BLAKE
      PONUICK              
|------------------- | -------------------------------------
|                    | Blake Ponuick,                       
|                    | Chief Executive Officer and President

---
EXHIBIT 32(b)

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Star Energy Corporation (Registrant) for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (Report), I, Ruairidh Campbell, chief financial officer, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

|(1) |  | This Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in this Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition of Registrant at the end of the period covered by this Report and results of operations of Registrant for the period covered by this Report.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell

Chief Financial Officer

May 12, 2006

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by §906 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2524 

AN ACT 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska 

Natives or descendants of Alaska Natives from being 

used to determine eligibility for certain programs, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2524 ES

1 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS. 

2 Section 29(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 

3 Act (43 U.S.C. 1626(c)) is amended, in the undesignated 

4 matter following paragraph (3), by striking subparagraph 

5 (E) and inserting the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) an interest in a Settlement Trust or an 

7 amount distributed from or benefit provided by a 

8 Settlement Trust to a Native or descendant of a Na9 tive who is an aged, blind, or disabled individual (as 

10 defined in section 1614(a) of the Social Security Act 

11 (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)).’’. 

Passed the Senate December 22, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2524 

AN ACT 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 

for certain programs, and for other purposes. Natives from being used to determine eligibility disabled Alaska Natives or descendants of Alaska to exclude certain payments to aged, blind, or
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael K. RobinsonMichael K. RobinsonChief Executive Officer, President and Assistant
Treasurer  31
EX-4.56



 Exhibit 4.56 
 English Summary 
 of 

Agreement on the Disposal of Equity Interest in E-surfing Media Co., Ltd. 

Between 

China Telecommunications Corporation 
 and 
 Registrant 

On April 26, 2013, the Registrant and China Telecommunications Corporation entered into an agreement (the “Disposal Agreement”), pursuant
to which the Registrant has agreed to sell and China Telecommunications Corporation has agreed to purchase 80% of the equity interests in E-surfing Media Co., Ltd. (the “E-surfing Media”), a subsidiary of the Registrant. 

Consideration 
 Pursuant to the Disposal
Agreement, the initial consideration for the Registrant’s disposal of its 80% equity interest in E-surfing Media (the “Initial Consideration”) is RMB1,195 million, which is based on the valuation of the equity interests in E-surfing
Media as at of 31 December 2012 as filed for the state-owned assets appraisals. In addition, adjustment will be made to the Initial Consideration to arrive at the final consideration (the “Final Consideration”) based on 80% of the
change in the net book value of the net assets of E-surfing Media during the period from December 31, 2012 to the date of competion of the transaction (the “Completion Date”). China Telecommunications Corporation is required to settle
the Final Consideration in cash within 5 business days after the Completion Date. 
 Conditions Precedent 

The transaction contemplated under the Disposal Agreement is conditional upon, among others: 

 

	1.	relevant shareholders’ resolution passed by the shareholders of E-surfing Media to approve the share transfer as set out in the Disposal Agreement; and


  

	2.	written consent by all other shareholders of E-surfing Media to approve the share transfer as set out in the Disposal Agreement and to waive their pre-emptive rights.


 Completion 

The transaction will be completed upon the completion of the relevant business registration of the transfer of shares of the E-surfing Media, and in any
event not later than 180 days from the date of the signing of the Disposal Agreement. 

  
 -1-
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

Consent of IndependentAuditors

Weconsent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Selected FinancialData”and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements onForm S-8 (Nos. 333-05415, 333-05417, 333-27031 and 333-33357) pertaining to theGalagen Inc. 1992 Stock Plan, Employee Stock Purchase Plan, Non-Statutory StockOption Agreements and the 1997 Incentive Plan of Galagen Inc. and in therelated Prospectus, of our report dated February 16, 2001, with respect to thefinancial statements and schedule of Galagen Inc. included in this AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.

 

 

 

                                                                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

 

Minneapolis,Minnesota

March28, 2001
# C_2016080EN.01000301.xml

| 2.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 80/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 80/3

---

Special Report No 25/2015

‘EU support for rural infrastructure: potential to achieve significantly greater value for money’

(2016/C 80/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 25/2015 ‘EU support for rural infrastructure: potential to achieve significantly greater value for money’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| Email: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

Email: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-21074 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MYRA “MARIA” GONZALEZ, also known as Maria Gonzalez-Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------------- CONSOLIDATED WITH No. 03-41500

-------------------------- UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARIA ELENA RINCON-MACARENA, also known as Maria Myra Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC Nos. H-00-CR-726-5 B-03-CR-432-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 23, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-21074 c/w 03-41500 -2- Myra “Maria” Gonzalez appeals her guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being found illegally present in the United States after deportation. She argues, pursuant to Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (2) are elements of the offense, not sentence enhancements, making those provisions unconstitutional. She concedes that this argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), and she raises it for possible review by the Supreme
Court. This argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , 523 U.S. at 235. We must follow the precedent set forth in Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation and citation omitted). Gonzalez does not brief any argument concerning how or why any potential reduction in her sentence for the 8 U.S.C. § 1326 conviction would have any bearing on the sentence the district court imposed upon revocation of her supervised release for her 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) conviction. She has therefore abandoned her appeal from the revocation of her supervised release. United States v. Valdiosera-Godinez , 932 F.2d 1093, 1099 (5th Cir. 1991).
AFFIRMED.
LOIS CAP PS 

23RD OlETRtCT, CALIPOPNJ A 

1110 LoiGwoHTH Huuat Oei'Kt SUILUNCI 

WASHINGTON. DC 2O&1&-052: 

(302) 3£S-3eU1 

COMMITTEE ON 

ENERGY AND COMMERCE 

COMMirreE ON 

NATURAL RESOURCES 

Congrefis of tije Winitth Btatti 

^oujse of iitprescntatfljefif 

August 18. 2010 

OISTRCT OffiCES 

D 1*11 M*,BW STMtT, S^TE 106 

S^^l LUIS OtNSrO, CA 93401 

(B05I 5dM34B 

D 301 fASrCAlMLIOSTHEtl. SUDF A 

SANTA BAnuAnA, CA SJ101 

(80G)730-1710 

D 267G NoHTH VrmuNA HOAD. Sum; 10S 

(805) ees-OBo? 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street, SW, Suite J 0200 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

C D 

1 

XT 

r n 

> ga o9§ 1 am writing to express my support for a Small Community Air Service Development Program grtm for 

Ventura County/Oxnard Airport, which is located in my congressional district. The grant request^s *^ 

$520,000 with a local contribution and ticket purchase program of $480,000 as an incentive for''new air 

service, 

Oxnard Airport has had continuous passenger air service since 1946. Unfortunately, United Express 

terminated its scheduled air service eariier this year leaving the community's airport with no air service. 

Ventura County has a population in excess of 820,000 people and will now be the largest unserved air 

passenger market in the country. Aiiport management has been actively seeking new air service and has met 

and discussed the market potential with eight airlines and all of them have requested some form of revenue 

guarantee to offset the initial start up cost. 

It is my understanding that Horizon Air has expressed the most interest at this time and could provide nonstop 

service to San Jose with flights continuing on to its markets in the Pacific Northwest. Horizon Air has 

requested an incentive package that includes a revenue guarantoe, airport fee waivers, local advertising and 

marketing, and a pic-purchase ticket program by local Ventura County businesses. The initial service would 

include two daily round trip flights with 76 seat Q-400 aircraft at feres that are competitive with fares at 

Burbank Airport and Los Angeles hitemational Airport. This is a major upgrade from previous air service. 

This route will be well received by our local business and military community. The high-tech and bio-tech 

industries in Ventura County will gieatly benefit with nonstop service to Silicon Valley. The Navy operations 

at Point Mugu and Port Hueneme (Naval Base Ventura County) also need a link to Navy bases in the Bay 

Area and Montei*ey. This service by Horizon Air will also keep Oxnard Airport connected to the National 

Transportation System. 

Thank you for your attention to this important request. Again, 1 offer my support for the Ventura 

Coimty/Oxnard Airport application and hope that you will give full and fair consideration to consistent with all 

relevant rules and regulations. 

Sincerely, 

LOIS^PPS 

Member of Congress 

pRifHEn ON fiEcvcLEO r^n n
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0577. QAZZAFI BUTT v. TAJ ONLINE, LLC d/b/a MEENA

JEWELERS.

This case began as an action for damages in magistrate court. Following an

adverse ruling in that court, plaintiff Qazzafi Butt appealed to the superior court,

which ruled in favor of Taj Online, LLC. Butt then appealed directly to this Court. 

We, however, lack jurisdiction.

“[A]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of lower

courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings shall be by application for discretionary

appeal.” Bullock v. Sand, 260 Ga. App. 874, 875 (581 SE2d 333) (2003) (punctuation

omitted); see also OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1). Butt’s failure to follow the proper

appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby

DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

December 06, 2016

12/06/2016
# •'•lEPARTMEN TO F VRAMSPORTATION - ..•i::CKE TOPERATIONS ' 

# City o f 

# SantaRosa•'"'"-"'^^^^

^

Augus t 20 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra yLaHoo d Secretar yo f Transportatio n U.S . Depjirtmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenu e S E Washingto n D C Subject : Docke t OST-2010-012 4 Dea rSecretar

yLaHood ; I strongl ysupport th e Charle s M . Schulz-Sonom a Count yAirport applicatio n fo ra gran t unde rth e Small CommunitYAi rServic e Developmen t Program . Thi s gran t alon g wit h loca l fund s wil l provid e fo r mailtetin g an d advertisin g t o attrac t Inboun d passengar e t o Sonom a Courttyo n Horizo n Air . Horizo n At rha s bee n a n excellen t partne rfo rSonom a Count yan d Sant a Ros a i n providin g nonsto p air servic e l o LO B Angeles , LB S Vegas , Portland , an d Seattle . Traffi crespons e fro m th e loca l Sonom a Countymarke t ha s bee n excellent . Unfortunately , th e Inboun d passenge rnumber s hav e no t bee n a s larg e a s expected , therefore , th e Sonom a CountyAirpor t an d it s marketin g partner s hav e develope d a progra m t o attrac t Inboun d visitor s t o Sonom a Count yan d increas e th e revenu e fo rHorizo n Air . Th e award o fth e requeste d gran t vtril l giv e th e Airpor t an d it s partner s th e fundin g tha t i t need s t o d o a n effectiv e jo b o fpromotin g Sonom a Count yan d Increas e th e numbe ro fvlattor s t o ou rarea , ( t i s estimate d tha t th e additiona l passenger s arrtwn g fro m thi s progra m wil l generat e ove r$1 1 millio n i n visito rspendin g i n th e loca l community . W e als o knov

/ tha t highe rItla d factor s fo rHorizo n Ai rca n mea n mor e flight s t o existin g market s an d t o ne wmarkets . Thi s program , wit h th e support o f fundin g fro m th e Smal l Communit yProgram , wil l definitel yb e a win-wi n situatio n to rloca l business, th e touris m community , th e airiine , tti e airport , variou s vendors , an d th e travelin g public . You rsupport o fou rreques t i s mos t appreciated . Pleas e cal l m e a t (707 ) 543-330 0 I fyo u hav e questions .

, E . 0OUI N Directo r

ECONOWH C DEVELOPMEN TAN D HOUSIN G 9 0 Sant a Ros a Avenu e • Sant a Rosa , C A95402-180 5 Phone : (707 ) 543-330 0 • Fax ; (707 } 543-331 7

www-srcity.or g

Smal l Cuniniimil yAi rServic e Developmen t Prognii n l'.^i: e 2 7 Clinrlo s M . Sduil ^

- Sono'i wCnuni yAirpo n Pcopo^^a l
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00257-CV

IN RE LARRY JOE MORGAN RELATOR

----------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 236-282599-15

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, GARDNER, and WALKER, JJ.

DELIVERED: July 26, 2016

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.