alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

v.

DAVID LEE THOMAS

, also known as

ABDULLAH MALIK THOMAS,

Defendant

. Criminal Action No. 17

- 194 (RDM)

E

- MAIL DECLARATION OF MS. GWENDOLYN GEOHAGHAN

I am the third

- party custodian for Mr. David Lee Thomas. By order of the Court, Mr. Thomas is

confined to my home at

. I attest that during the

period of his release, Mr. Thomas has not left my home except as authorized by the Court’s order or

by pretrial services and that he has fully abided by the terms of his pretrial release. I attest that

, if Mr.

Thomas violates a condition of release or is no longer in my custody, I will notify the Court and

pretrial services immediately.

By submitting this statement, I, Gwendolyn Geohaghan, declare, under the penalty of perjury, that

the statements contained in this email are true and correct. I further understand that I could be

prosecuted for perjury for making a false statement under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 if the statements made

in this email are not true and correct.

/s/ Gwendolyn Geohaghan

Date : DD/MO/YEAR
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2932 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 430 South Knowles Avenue in New Richmond, 

Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Robert C. Harmon and Private John R. Peirson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2932 ES

1 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN ROBERT C. HARMON AND PRIVATE 

2 JOHN R. PEIRSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 430 South Knowles Avenue in 

5 New Richmond, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Captain Robert C. Harmon and Private John R. 

7 Peirson Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Robert C. 

12 Harmon and Private John R. Peirson Post Office Build13 ing’’. 

Passed the Senate May 25, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2932 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Robert C. Harmon and Private John R. Peirson in New Richmond, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain al Service located at 430 South Knowles Avenue
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00475-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.B., Jr., Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-PA-00828

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 6, 2014

DISMISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of 

service to appellee, which has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       5,641,500
<SECURITIES>                                 7,472,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,454,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                   454,400
<INVENTORY>                                 14,565,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            45,033,800
<PP&E>                                       3,964,600
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,103,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,807,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,402,200
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        88,900
<OTHER-SE>                                  59,521,500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                59,610,400
<SALES>                                     72,758,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            72,758,800
<CGS>                                       52,026,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               66,475,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               605,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               263,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             667,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,677,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,010,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,666,800
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,666,800
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.57


</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending January 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic Report"), I, Sandro
Natale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





1.       the
Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.       the
information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Dated:
      March 12, 2010
                    
                    /s/
      Sandro NataleName:  Sandro
      NataleTitle:
      President  & Chief Executive
  Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RIVER MASCARI,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00281-CR

Appeal from the

210th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D06125)

O R D E R

The trial court judge has verbally informed the Clerk’s Office that Appellant does not 

have a right to appeal. The trial court has not, however, entered a written certification of the 

Appellant’s right to appeal as required by the Rules of Appellate Procedure. See TEX.R.APP.P.

25.2(d), Appendix D. Accordingly, the trial court is ordered to enter the required certification 

and file it with the trial court clerk within thirty days of the date of this order. See Cortez v. 

State, 420 S.W.3d 803 806-07 (Tex.Crim.App. 2013). If the trial court is unable to obtain the 

defendant’s signature on the certification, the trial court should nevertheless certify whether 

Appellant has a right to appeal and file the certification without the Appellant’s signature. The 

trial court clerk shall provide a copy of the certification to this Court as soon as possible, but not 

later than three days after it is filed. See TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(e). 

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7

th day of December, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 4.40


 


Execution Copy


 


[Note: Translation from the original agreement
in Chinese]


 


Power of Attorney


 


I, Guangfu Cui, a citizen
of the People’s Republic of China (“China”), hold a 50.0% equity interest in Beijing Asiamedia Interactive
Advertising Co., Ltd. (the “Company”). I hereby irrevocably agree to authorize eLong, Inc., or any entity or
person (including such party’s successor) designated in writing by eLong, Inc., (the “Authorized Party”) to hold
and exercise the following rights related to this equity interest during the period of validity of this Power of Attorney:


 


Authorize the Authorized
Party to have full rights and authority to represent me, in my name as holder of 50.0% equity interest, according to the law and
the company’s articles of incorporation, to exercise any and all shareholder rights, including but not limited to: the right
to convene shareholders’ meetings, receive any notices or procedures regarding shareholders’ meetings, to attend shareholders’
meetings and exercise full voting power as the holder of 50.0% equity interest (including, as my authorized representative, designating
or appointing the Company’s Directors, General Manager, Finance Controller and other senior management, determining dividends,
and other matters), to sell or transfer my 50.0% equity interest in the Company, etc.


 


The Authorized Party
has the right to designate its Directors (or Executive Director) to appoint a person to exercise the rights granted by this Power
of Attorney.


 


This Power of Attorney
shall become binding, effective and enforceable upon my signature. The Power of Attorney shall have a term of 20 years, which may
be automatically extended for successive additional 20 year terms without limit, as long as I remain a holder of any equity interest
in the Company.


 


[remainder of page intentionally left blank]


 




    	- 1 -



    	 



    

 


[Power of Attorney signature page]


 


	Authorizing
    Party :	 
	 	 
	Signature
    :	/s/Guangfu Cui	 
	 	 
	Date
    : 12/26/2012	 



 


	Authorized Party :	 	 
	 	 	 
	eLong, Inc.	 	 
	 	 	 
	Signature of authorized representative :	/s/ Sami Farhad	 
	 	 	 
	Date	 	 




 




    	- 2 -
**Exhibit99(ii)**

 

**Certifications**

 

I, Daryl S. Meddings, Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer of Ocean West Holding Corporation, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ocean West Holding Corporation; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisquarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a datewithin 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on ourevaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): 

 

d) all significant deficiencies inthe design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses ininternal controls; and 

 

e) any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significantchanges in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3030230-AUG-201108:35 AM
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-60753

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NATHANIEL COOPER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:14-CR-2-2

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Nathaniel Cooper appeals his 22-month sentence for making false or 

fraudulent claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 287. He 

challenges the district court’s determination of the amount of loss attributable 

to him and its denial of a minor role adjustment. The Government moves to 

dismiss the appeal, arguing that it is barred by the appeal waiver in Cooper’s 

plea agreement. In the alternative, the Government moves for summary 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-60753 Document: 00513786557 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
No. 15-60753

2

affirmance based on the appeal waiver. Cooper opposes both motions. Because 

we conclude that Cooper’s challenges to his sentence fail on the merits, we 

pretermit the question whether the waiver bars the instant appeal and, 

accordingly, deny the Government’s motions. See United States v. Story, 439 

F.3d 226, 230-31 (5th Cir. 2006).

Cooper argues first that the loss amount, which resulted in a six-level 

guidelines enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2B1.1(b)(1)(D), was erroneous. 

Although he objected to the loss amount in the district court, Cooper withdrew 

that objection, thereby waiving any claim of error. See United States v. Conn, 

657 F.3d 280, 286 (5th Cir. 2011). “Waived errors are entirely unreviewable[.]” 

United States v. Musquiz, 45 F.3d 927, 931 (5th Cir. 1995).

Next, Cooper asserts that the district court erred by denying him a minor 

role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 because he was merely a “runner” for 

a codefendant, who was the ringleader. We have reviewed the record in light 

of Cooper’s arguments. Cooper fails to show that the district court’s ruling was 

clearly erroneous. See United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203-04 (5th 

Cir. 2005).

The Government’s motions to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary 

affirmance are DENIED. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 15-60753 Document: 00513786557 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOUND IN THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-K AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED 12/31/97
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,410
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,816
<PP&E>                                          25,143
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,737
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 123,369
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,012
<BONDS>                                        123,072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          105,306
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                   (129,718)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   123,369
<SALES>                                          3,275
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,275
<CGS>                                            3,471
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                31,174
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (96,806)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (96,806)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (123,650)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. LORRAINE M. DUTILL, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 120 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 15, 2018

NO. 03-17-00806-CR

Christopher Lynn Newberry, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 403RD DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES FIELD AND TOTH

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the court’s

judgment requiring reversal. However, there was error in the judgment that requires correction. 

Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment in trial court cause number D-1-DC-16-

301799 to indicate that appellant was found guilty of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, 

a second-degree felony, pursuant to Texas Penal Code section 22.02(a)(2). The judgment, as 

modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-6574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JONATHAN TREWAYNE CLANTON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior 

District Judge. (4:05-cr-00031-JLK) 

Submitted: April 28, 2009 Decided: May 13, 2009 

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Jonathan Trewayne Clanton, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew 

Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Jonathan Trewayne Clanton appeals the district court’s 

order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. 

Clanton, No. 4:05-cr-00031-JLK (W.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2008). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
TIMMURPH Y 18T H DISTRICT , PENNSYLVANI A COMMITTE E O N ENERG Y AN D COMMERC E HEALT H COMMERCE , TRAD E AN D CONSUME R PROTECTIO N 

## (EflngreB H o f ti| e Mnitt b ^tatc a Hafiiitngton

. iO I 2fl5X 5 CO-CHAIR , STEE L CAUCU S CO-CHAIR , 21=

^ CENTUR Y HEALT H CAR E CAUCU S CqtCHAiR , MENTA L HEALT H CAUCU S CO^CHAIR , FRIEND S O F IRELAN D SUBURBA N CAUCU S

WEBSITE : murphy.house.go v

Jul y 19,201 1 Aloh aLe y Associat e Director Smal l Communit

y Air Servic e Developmen

t Program , X-5 5 U s Departmen

t O f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jersey Ave , S E Washington , D.C

. 2059 0 (N O 1 >

C D
Dea r Associat e Directo r

Ley : I a mi n receip t o f correspondenc e fro

mth e Westmoreland Count y Airpor t Authorit y (WCAA) , operator s o

f the Arnol d Palme

r Regiona l Airpor t (LBE) locate d i

n Unit y Township , Pennsylvania

. WCA

A ha s applie d fo

r the Smal l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Program , an d I writ e to yo u toda y o n their behalf

. Westmoreland Count

y ha s apopulation o

f approximatel

y 400,000 , and the airpor

t ha s the potentia l o f servin g u p t o 750,00 0 resident s o

f the Greate

r Pittsburgh area . Th e Arnol d Palme r Regiona l Airpor t bega n servicing commercia

l flight s to Pittsburgh Internationa l (PIT ) i n the 1980's

. The departur

e o f U S Airway s fromthe regio n an d the bankruptc y o

f Northwes t

Airline s commercia

l servic e a t the hu b hav e lef t LB E solel y servicin g charte

r flights

. I n February , LB E contracted ; Spiri t

Airline s t o provide commercia

l servic e to Ft

. Lauderdale , Florida , an d Myrtl e Beach , Sout

h Carolina

. Sinc e then , mor e tha n 30,00 0 passenger s hav e flow n through the terminal , an d wit h fundin g through thi s program , LB E will expand it s marketing abilitie s to attrac t mor e businesses , educationa

l institutions , an

d recreationa

l travelers

. Th e Westmorelan d Count y Airpor t Authorit y als o plan s to us e thi s fundin g t o expand awarenes s o

f the airport' s potentia

l a s ahu b to PIT , know n a s 'Th e Pittsburgh Connector. " I urg e yo u t o giv e thi s proposa

l fo r fundin g you r ful l an d fai r consideration

. Than

k yo u fo r you r tim e an d attentio n to thi s matter
. Sincerely ,

Ti mMurph y Membe r o f Congres s

Q 32 2 CANNO N HOUS E OFFIC E BUILDIN G

WASHINGTON , D C 2051 5 (202)225-230 1 FAX:(202 ) 225-184 4 n 50 4 WASHINGTO N ROA D PITTSBURGH , P A 1522 8 (412)344-558 3 FAX : (412)429-509 2 L J 204 0 FREDERICKSO N PLAC E ROUT E 13 6 GREENSBURG , P A 1560 1 (724)850-731 2 FAX : (724)850-731 5