Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 59 / Friday, March 27, 2015 / Notices 16463 

Brown (240–888–9835) to be escorted to 

the meeting room. 

Dated: March 18, 2015. 

Mark L. Banks, 

Chief, Technical Support Branch, Advisory 

Committee on Reactor Safeguards. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07087 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

NUCLEAR REGULATORY 

COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. 50–327 and 50–328; NRC– 

2013–0037] 

Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 

AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission. 

ACTION: Supplemental environmental 

impact statement; issuance. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission (NRC) is issuing a final 

plant-specific supplement, Supplement 

53, to NUREG–1437, ‘‘Generic 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

License Renewal of Nuclear Plants 

(GEIS),’’ regarding the renewal of 

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) 

operating licenses DPR–77 and DPR–79 

for an additional 20 years of operation 

for Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 

2 (SQN). 

DATES: The supplemental environmental 

impact statement referenced in this 

document is available on March 27, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID 

NRC–2013–0037 when contacting the 

NRC about the availability of 

information regarding this document. 

You may obtain publicly-available 

information related to this document 

using any of the following methods: 

• Federal Rulemaking Web site: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov and search 

for Docket ID NRC–2013–0037. Address 

questions about NRC dockets to Carol 

Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463; 

email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For 

technical questions, contact the 

individual listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section of this 

document. 

• NRC’s Agencywide Documents 

Access and Management System 

(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the 

ADAMS Public Documents collection at 

http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/

adams.html. To begin the search, select 

‘‘ADAMS Public Documents’’ and then 

select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS 

Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, 

please contact the NRC’s Public 

Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 

1–800–397–4209, 301–415–4737, or by 

email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The final 

Supplement 53 to the GEIS is available 

in ADAMS under Accession No. 

ML15075A438. 

• NRC’s PDR: You may examine and 

purchase copies of public documents at 

the NRC’s PDR, Room O1–F21, One 

White Flint North, 11555 Rockville 

Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. 

• Chattanooga-Hamilton County 

Library, Northgate Branch: The final 

Supplement 53 to the GEIS is available 

for public inspection at 520 Northgate 

Mall Road, Chattanooga, TN 37415. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David Drucker, Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001; telephone: 800–368– 

5692, ext. 6223, email: David.Drucker@

nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

In accordance with § 51.118 of Title 

10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 

the NRC is issuing the final Supplement 

53 to the GEIS regarding the renewal of 

TVA operating licenses DPR–77 and 

DPR–79 for an additional 20 years of 

operation for SQN. Draft Supplement 53 

to the GEIS was noticed by the NRC in 

the Federal Register on August 11, 2014 

(79 FR 46878), and noticed by the 

Environmental Protection Agency on 

August 15, 2014 (79 FR 48140). The 

public comment period on draft 

Supplement 53 to the GEIS ended on 

September 29, 2014, and the comments 

received are addressed in final 

Supplement 53 to the GEIS. 

II. Discussion 

As discussed in Chapter 5 of the final 

Supplement 53 to the GEIS, the NRC 

determined that the adverse 

environmental impacts of license 

renewal for SQN are not so great that 

preserving the option of license renewal 

for energy-planning decisionmakers 

would be unreasonable. This 

recommendation is based on: (1) The 

analysis and findings in the GEIS; (2) 

information provided in the 

environmental report and other 

documents submitted by TVA; (3) 

consultation with Federal, State, local, 

and Tribal agencies; (4) the NRC staff’s 

independent environmental review; and 

(5) consideration of public comments 

received during the scoping process and 

on the draft supplemental 

environmental impact statement. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 19th day 

of March, 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Brian D. Wittick, 

Chief, Projects Branch 2, Division of License 

Renewal, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06961 Filed 3–26–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

PACIFIC NORTHWEST ELECTRIC 

POWER AND CONSERVATION 

PLANNING COUNCIL 

Amended Columbia River Basin Fish 

and Wildlife Program; Corrected Notice 

AGENCY: Pacific Northwest Electric 

Power and Conservation Planning 

Council (Northwest Power and 

Conservation Council, Council), an 

interstate compact agency organized 

under the authority of the Pacific 

Northwest Electric Power Planning and 

Conservation Act of 1980, 16 U.S.C. 839 

et seq. (Northwest Power Act). 

ACTION: Notice of final action adopting 

the amended Columbia River Basin Fish 

and Wildlife Program. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to Section 4(h) of 

the Northwest Power Act, the Council 

has amended its Columbia River Basin 

Fish and Wildlife Program (program). 

The final amended program may be 

found on the Council’s Web site at 

http://www.nwcouncil.org/fw/program/

2014-12. In the Council’s earlier notice 

of the amended program (Doc #2015– 

06299, published 3/19/2015) the URL 

link was incorrectly stated as http://

www.nwcouncil.org/fw/

2014F&WProgram/. 

Background: Pursuant to Section 4(h) 

of the Northwest Power Act, in March 

2013 the Northwest Power and 

Conservation Council requested in 

writing that state and federal fish and 

wildlife agencies, Indian tribes, and 

others submit recommendations for 

amendments to the Council’s Columbia 

River Basin Fish and Wildlife Program. 

The Council received over 1,500 pages 

of recommendations and supporting 

information from 68 entities and 412 

individuals. The Council subsequently 

received extensive written public 

comment on the program amendment 

recommendations. 

In May 2014, after reviewing the 

recommendations, the supporting 

information, the comments received on 

the recommendations, and other 

information in the administrative 

record, the Council released for public 

review a draft revised program. The 

Council received over 1,500 pages of 

substantial written comments on the 

draft amendments. The Council also 

took oral testimony at ten public 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES