alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## OfRARTMEN TO F •JpSPOpriO N • ^^-^0;\t TOPERATION S Stuar t Frase r Mayo r August 11 , 201 0 Departmen t o f Transportatio n I n th e Matte ro f Gran t Application s Smal l Commifliit yAi rServic e Developmen t Progra m Unde r4 9 U.S.C . 4174 3 e t seq . Docke t DOT-O5T-2010-012 4 I a m writin g i n support o f th e Tellurid e Airpor t Authorit yreques t fo ra Smal l Communit yAi rService Developmen t Progra m gran t awar d fro m th e Departmen t o f Trcirisportation . I n th e pas t fe wyears v ^ hav e see n a reductio n i n servic e ou t o f th e Tellurid e Airport . Thi s ha s raise d fare s an d cause d loca l resident s an d visitor s alike , t o driv e a grea t distanc e t o trave l fro m othe rairports . Ou r communities ' access t o a n ai rservic e gran t awar d vril l giv e Tellurid e a competitiv e chanc e t o increas e ai r service , reduc e airfare s an d recove rai rsea t capacit ytha t ha s bee n los t ove rth e las t coupl e o f years . tellurid e ha

s a regiona l econom yvrtiic h i s highl ydependen t o n touris m an d ai rservic e access ; sustainin g an d grovrin g ou rpresen t ai racces s i s critica l t o th e developmen t o f othe rloca l industrie s an d t o suppor t ou rloca l school s an d medica l needs . Th e Tellurid e Regiona l Airpor t i s th e highes t altitud e commercia l airpor t I n th e Unite d States ! Thi s present s additiona l challenge s t o attractin g ne wai rservic e an d require s mor e fundin g i n orde rt o d o so . Start-u p fundin g support vi a th e Smal l CommunityAi rServic e Gran t progra m woul d g o a lon g v«i yi n helpin g u s wit h ou rai rservic e attractio n goals . Than k yo u i n advanc e fo ryou rconsideratio n o f th e Tellifrid e Airpor t Authorit ySmal l CommunityAi rServk e Developmen t Progrjw n Gran t reqiffis L Your ^ truly , Stuart Frase r Mayo ro f tellurid e

11 3 W . Columbi a Avenu e • P O Bo x39 7 • Telluride . C O • 970.728.013 6 • Fa x970.728.249 6 email : sfraser@roadmnner.co m
13 CA ADC § 2269 Page 1

13 CCR s 2269
Cal. Admin. Code tit. 13 , s 2269

© 2010 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. BARCLAYS OFFICIAL CALIFORNIA CODE OF

REGULATIONS
TITLE 13. MOTOR VEHICLES DIVISION 3. AIR RESOURCES BOARD CHAPTER 5. STANDARDS FOR MOTOR V EHICLE FUELS ARTICLE 1. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE
SUBARTICLE 2. STANDARDS FOR GASOLINE SOLD BEGINNING MARCH 1, 1996 This database is current through 12/26/2003, Register

2003, No. 52.

s 2269. Submittal of Compliance Plans.

(a) Each producer shall, by September 1, 2000, submit to the executive officer a plan showing the producer's sch edule for achieving compliance with the CaRFG Phase 3 standards set forth in this subarticle. Each prod ucer shall, by September 1, 2001, September 1, 2002, and September 1, 2003 submit an update of the plan. Each compliance plan and update shall include the projected sequence and dates of all key events pertaining to planning, financing,
and construction of necessary refinery modifications.

< General Materials (GM)

- References, Annotations, or

Tables >

Note: Authority cited: Sections 39600, 39601, 43013, 43013.1, 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code;
andWestern Oil and Gas Ass'n. v.Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975). Reference: Sections 39000, 39001, 39002, 39003, 39010, 39500, 39515, 39516, 41511, 43000, 43013.1, 43016, 43018 and 43101, Health and Safety Code; andWestern Oil and Gas Ass'n. v.Orange County Air Pollution Control District, 14 Cal.3d 411, 121 Cal. Rptr. 249 (1975).

HISTORY

1. New section filed 11

- 16

- 92; operative 12

- 16

- 92 (Register 92, No. 47).

2. Amendment of section a nd Note filed 8

- 3

- 2000; operative 9

- 2

- 2000 (Register 2000, No. 31).

3. Amendment filed 12

- 24

- 2002; operative 12

- 24

- 2002 pursuant to Goverment Code section 11343.4 (Register 2002, No. 52).

13 CA ADC s 2269
END OF DOCUMENT
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7672
CURTIS J. BROWN, SR., Petitioner - Appellant, versus STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-97-2199-2-18-AJ) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 20, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis J. Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find noreversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. South Carolina , No. CA-97-2199-2-18-AJ (D.S.C. Nov. 10, 1997). We deny Brown's motions for appointment of counsel and an injunction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Corn for Grain 2022

Harvested Acres by County

for Selected States

U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service

Acres

Not Estimated

< 10,000

10,000 - 24,999

25,000 - 49,999

50,000 - 99,999

100,000 - 149,999

150,000 +
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to**

**Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Héctor Alonso, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared, 

 

(b) [omitted pursuant to the guidance of Release No. 33-8283 (June 5, 2003)], 

 

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation, and 

 

(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and 

 

(b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

 

March 31,2006
[Civ. No. 9316.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

June 13, 1934.]

#### SPROUL McCLOY, etc., Respondent, v. HUNTINGTON PARK UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY (a Corporation), Appellant; HARRY W. FLETCHER et al., Defendants.

Everett W. Mattoon, County Counsel, and Ernest Pur-dum, Deputy County Counsel, for Appellant.

Ezra Neff for Respondent.

SCHMIDT, J., *pro tem.*

This appeal is from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the Huntington Park Union High School District arising from injuries to plaintiff claimed to have been caused through the negligence of a fellow student; the additional claim being made that said fellow student acted under the order or direction of one of the teachers of the school.

Several questions are raised. Only one need be considered as it is determinative of this appeal. In an action for damages for personal injuries to a student arising from the negligent act of a fellow student, even though such fellow student act upon the order, direction or instruction of an instructor of the school, can such injured student maintain an action for damages against the school district?

*238Since the trial of this action in the court below £.nd the taking of this appeal, this department of the appellate court held to the contrary in *Hack*v. *Sacramento City Junior Col. Dist.,*131 Cal. App. 444 [21 Pac. (2d) 477], Commencing bottom page 447: "By the amendment of section 1623 of the Political Code” (Stats. 1923, p. 298 — which is now School Code, sees. 2.800-2.804), "the state consented that a school district could be sued for the negligent acts of the officers or employees of the district *(Ahern*v. *Livermore Union High School Dist.,*208 Cal. 770 [284 Pac. 1105]), but counsel have cited no authority and we know of none that holds that a school district may be sued for the negligent acts of the students.

"The fact that the students were attempting to carry out certain requests made by their instructor, Mr. Halstead, does not change the rule. In conducting elasswork a teacher must frequently give directions. While carrying out such directions the students may, in many ways, act without due care. But for their negligence in such matters the statutes have not gone to the extent of imposing a liability on the school district.

"From what has been said we think it clearly appears that no act of negligence was alleged, proved or found against an officer or employee of the defendant. The utmost that can be claimed is that negligence was committed by the students Hunt and Thorne, who are not parties to the action. ’ ’

A petition for hearing in the Supreme Court was denied. Analogous decisions are found in *Ellis*v. *Burns Valley School District,*128 Cal. App. 550 [18 Pac. (2d) 79], and *Underhill v. Alameda Elementary School District,*133 Cal. App. 733 [24 Pac. (2d) 849].

At the close of plaintiff’s ease at bar defendant and appellant moved the trial court for a nonsuit as well as for a directed verdict. In view of the foregoing, the motion for a directed verdict should have been granted.

Judgment reversed.

Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.
SHAWN BOYD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-756

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 10, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Jonathan E. Sjostrom, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kathleen Stover, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1318, -1319

INVISIBLE FENCE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PERIMETER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.

Larry L. Barnard , Carson Boxberger LLP, of Fort Wayne, Indiana, argued for

plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jon A. Bragalone

.

Gregory F. Ahrens , Wood, Herron & Evans, L.L.P., of Cincinnati, Ohio, argued

for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief was John P. Davis

.

Appealed from: United States District C ourt for the Northern District of Indiana

Magistrate Judge Roger B. CosbeyNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2007-1318, -1319

INVISIBLE FENCE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

PERIMETER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Defendant-Cross Appellant.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

in CASE NO(S). 1:05-CV-361

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (LOURIE, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED: January 8, 2008 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2001, and to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on Forms S-8, as amended (File Nos. 333-91601,
333-85979, 333-18411 and 333-44710) and Forms S-3, as amended (File Nos.
333-70031, 333-56519, 333-91573, 333-82103, 333-34782 and 333-40794) or our
report dated March 26, 2002, relating to the audit of the consolidated balance
sheet of Brilliant Digital Entertainment, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and the
consolidated results of their operations and comprehensive loss, cash flows and
stockholders' deficit for the year ended December 31, 2001, which appears in
this Form 10-KSB.


/s/   BDO Seidman, LLP

Los Angeles, CA
March 26, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 13, 2011 

d0112 

Order 

 

January 13, 2011 

141634 

CLAUDE McMANUS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

VALERIE McMANUS-ZOERHOF, 

 Plaintiff, 

v SC: 141634 

 COA: 290249 

Kent CC: 05-002677-CK 

KEVIN M. TOLER, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 27, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 MARILYN KELLY and HATHAWAY, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
EPA Reg. No. 67071-12

Vol. 1 – part 1
# C_2016026EN.01000101.xml

| 23.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7779 — Trafigura/Nyrstar)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 26/01)

On 15 December 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7779. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7779. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Vertrue Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period  ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, James B.  Duffy,
Executive Vice President,  Chief Operating Officer,  and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, to my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ James B. Duffy
-----------------------------------
James B. Duffy
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating
Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
Vertrue Incorporated

September 12, 2006



























A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

Calendar No. 189 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2932 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

430 South Knowles Avenue in New Richmond, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Robert C. Harmon and Private John R. Peirson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 5, 2021 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself and Mr. JOHNSON) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Reported by Mr. PETERS, without amendment 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 430 South Knowles Avenue in New Richmond, 

Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain Robert C. Harmon and Private John R. Peirson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2932 RS

1 SECTION 1. CAPTAIN ROBERT C. HARMON AND PRIVATE 

2 JOHN R. PEIRSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

3 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

4 Postal Service located at 430 South Knowles Avenue in 

5 New Richmond, Wisconsin, shall be known and designated 

6 as the ‘‘Captain Robert C. Harmon and Private John R. 

7 Peirson Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

10 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

11 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Captain Robert C. 

12 Harmon and Private John R. Peirson Post Office Build13 ing’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS

pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 189 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2932 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office Building’’. Robert C. Harmon and Private John R. Peirson in New Richmond, Wisconsin, as the ‘‘Captain al Service located at 430 South Knowles Avenue 

DECEMBER 16, 2021 

Reported without amendment 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.4
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints George L. Lippe, Robert E. Sulentic and William P. Leiser the true and
lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998, and to sign any or all amendments to such
Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, each of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their
substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
                                      /s/ James R. Erwin
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                          James R. Erwin
Exhibit 99.12

News
Release
March 1, 2000

Trading Symbols:TRBD (EASDAQ)

TURBODYNE REVISES THE FINANCIAL RESULTS RELEASE SCHEDULE FOR 2000

Carpinteria, CAMarch 1, 2000Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD)
announces the following revised schedule for the release of Turbodyne's financial results:

Annual
Financial Results 1999 - March 30, 2000
    First quarter 2000 - May 15, 2000
    Second quarter and first half 2000 - August 14, 2000
    Third quarter and nine months 2000 - November 14, 2000

The
date of the Annual Shareholder Meeting is Friday, May 12, 2000.

Turbodyne
Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company, specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion engines plus the development and
manufacturing of high-tech assemblies for electrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business
location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Contacts:

Corporate
Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group FinanceInvestor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Investor Relations, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665

---

QuickLinks