alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.B



 Exhibit 10 (b) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of
Additional Information included in Post-Effective No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-185573) under the Securities Act of 1933 for Separate Account VA B and related Prospectus of Partners Variable Annuity Series and
to the use of our report dated April 3, 2013, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 

April 22, 2013
#### Joseph Geneva et al., Respondents, v Jeffrey Lash, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 832]

*545In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Peck, J.), dated July 3, 2003, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

On December 31, 2000, at approximately 10:40 p.m., the plaintiff Joseph Geneva slipped and fell on an accumulation of snow on the sidewalk in front of the house owned by his next-door neighbor, the defendant Jeffrey Lash.

The defendant established his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that any purported negligence on his part was not a proximate cause of the injured plaintiffs injuries (see *Maliszewska v Premier Distrib. Servs.,*306 AD2d 517 [2003]). In opposition, the plaintiffs’ conclusory and speculative evidence failed to demonstrate the existence of any genuine issue of fact (see *Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Florio, J.P., Schmidt, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.
# oe..___

6H IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 23 - 0711 IN THE PARENTING OF: B.C.H. and T.C.H.: PAUL HENION,

Petitioner and Appellee, v. GENAVIERE BRADFORD,

Respondent and Appellant. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPO INTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c), IT IS ORDERED THAT **David F. Stufft,** whose name appears next on the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Domestic Relations appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P ., 7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment. A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof. DATED this January 5, 2024.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court c: Caydon Keller, David J. Lee, Tiffany B. Lonnevik 01/05/2024
Case Number: DA 23-0711
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHRISTOPHER ALPHA HOLDER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 294 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference to our reserve
reports for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, each of which is
included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Ultra Petroleum Corp. for the year
ended December 31, 2002.

                                  NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.





                                  By: /s/ Frederic D. Sewell
                                      -----------------------------------------
                                           Frederic D. Sewell
                                           Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Dallas, Texas
March 24, 2003
#### Edward J. Kelsey, *v.*James Sargent.1

*(Court of Appeals,*

*Filed January*25, 1887.)

1. Judgment — Rendering a ¡reference necessary is interlocutory. A judgment rendering a reference necessary is interlocutory, not final.

2. Appeal — Order denying new trial appeal arle — Code Civ. Pro., § 190, subd. 2.

Prom such a judgment rendered hy a special term an appeal was taken to the general term and the defendant also moved for a new trial upon exceptions under Code Civ. Pro., § 1001. *Held,*that under Code Civ. Pro., § 190, suhd. 2, the appeal was well taken so far as it affected an order denying the motion for a new trial.

3. Same — When in part well taken, motion to dismiss as a whole will BE DENIED.

*Held,*that the appeal being in part well taken, a motion to dismiss it as % whole should be denied.

Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of tbe supreme court, general term, fifth department.

*Theodore Bacon,*for the motion; *J. & Q. Van Voorhis,*opposed.

1

 Affirming 3 N. Y. State Reporter, 477; 41 Hun, 637*mem.*

Per Curiam.

Tbe judgment rendered at special term made a reference necessary, therefore it was not final, but interlocutory. *Barker*v. *White,*58 N. Y., 204.

An appeal, however, was taken to tbe general term, and upon exceptions the defendant also moved that court for a new trial under section 1001 of tbe Code. Tbe judgment was affirmed and tbe motion for a new trial denied. One order embraced both decisions, and from the whole of that order tbe defendant appealed.

So far as tbe appeal affects tbe order denying a new trial, it was well taken (§ 190, subd. 2; *Raynor*v. *Raynor,*94 N. Y., 248, 251,) and as tbe motion to dismiss relates to tbe whole appeal, and not a part only, it should be denied, and as tbe plaintiff asks for too much, be should pay costs.

Motion denied, with $10 costs.

All concur.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2889 

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 to address the timing 

for the use of funds with respect to grants made to shuttered venue operators. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2021 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 

and Entrepreneurship 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 to 

address the timing for the use of funds with respect 

to grants made to shuttered venue operators. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Our Stages Ex5 tension Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR SHUTTERED VENUE OPERATORS. 

7 Section 324(d) of title III of division N of the Con8 solidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116–260) 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2889 IS

1 is amended by striking paragraph (1) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(1) TIMING.— 

4 ‘‘(A) EXPENSES INCURRED.—Amounts re5 ceived under a grant under this section may be 

6 used for costs incurred during the period begin7 ning on March 1, 2020, and ending on March 

8 11, 2023. 

9 ‘‘(B) EXPENDITURE.—An eligible person 

10 or entity shall return to the Administrator any 

11 amounts received under a grant under this sec12 tion that are not expended on or before April 

13 15, 2023, with respect to costs incurred during 

14 the period described in subparagraph (A).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
###### **EXHIBIT 32.1**

# ***Certificate of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002***

 

               In connection with the quarterly report of Summus, Inc. (USA) (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bjorn D. Jawerth,the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

> - The Report fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and 
- The information contained in this    Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions    and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date:          August 13, 2003 |  /s/ Bjorn D.JawerthBjorn D. JawerthChairman of the Board and    ChiefExecutive Officer |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order entered April 8, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00073
- CV
IN THE ESTATE OF IRA E. TOBOLOWSKY, DECE ASED

On Appeal from the 95th District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 18
- 17620



### O RDER
This is an appeal from the trial court’s Dece mber 30, 2018 order concerning appellee’s Rule 202 petition . The order is challenged by the City of Dallas, Dallas County, and the Dallas County Medical E xaminer. Appellee has filed a conditional cross

- appeal. Before the Court is the
C ity’s April 4, 2019 unopposed motion for extension of time to file its opening brief

. The City seeks an extension because a hearing on a motion for reconsideration of the De cember 30 th order is set in the trial court for April 10, 2019 , and the trial court’s ruling “could allow the parties to resolve the remaining issues in this appeal.”
We note that w e questioned our jurisdiction over the County and the Medical Examiner’s
ap peal , and a determination as to whether we have jurisdiction over that portion of the appeal remains pending

. In light of this and the upcoming trial court hearing, we SUSPEND the briefing deadlines. We ORDER the City to file a status report following th e trial court hearing and no later than April 18, 2019. The Court will set new briefing deadlines as necessary once thestatus report is filed and a determination is made as to our jurisdiction over the County and

Medical Examiner’s appeal.

/s/ BI LL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT
31.1


SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION





I,
Michael S. Wasik, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10−KSB of Roomlinx, Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report.





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a−15(e) and 15d−15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such


disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our


supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the small


business
issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known


to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period


in which
this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's


disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our


conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and


procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on


such
evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's


internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the


small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business


issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that


has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,


the small
business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;


and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design


or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are


reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's


ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information;


and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or


other
employees who have a significant role in the small business


issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.





Date:
10/8/08





By:
            /s/ Michael S.
      WasikMichael
      S. WasikChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2880 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2880

To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 to 
   modify certain deadlines relating to the Commission on Combating 
                     Synthetic Opioid Trafficking.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2021

  Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020 to 
   modify certain deadlines relating to the Commission on Combating 
                     Synthetic Opioid Trafficking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN DEADLINES FOR COMMISSION ON 
              COMBATING SYNTHETIC OPIOID TRAFFICKING.

    Section 7221(f)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for 
Fiscal Year 2020 (Public Law 116-92; 133 Stat. 2273) is amended by 
striking ``270 days'' and inserting ``390 days''.
                                 <all>
```
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Fieldbridge Associates, LLC, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Blond Taylor, Appellant, and Ledner Taylor, Defendant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Steven Z. Mostofsky, J.), entered May 20, 2015. The order denied tenant Blond Taylor's motion to vacate an income execution.</p><p>ORDERED that the.order is reversed, without costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new determination, following a hearing, of tenant Blond Taylor's motion to vacate the income execution.</p><p>After the execution of a stipulation of settlement in this nonpayment proceeding, a final judgment was entered on August 7, 2014 awarding landlord possession and the principal sum of $2,690.44. Thereafter, Blond Taylor (tenant) moved to vacate an income execution, alleging, among other things, that the security deposit had not been properly credited toward the amount owed to landlord. Landlord opposed the motion. By order entered May 20, 2015, the Civil Court denied the motion.</p><p>On appeal, tenant again contends that the security deposit in the sum of $975, and a payment by the Human Resources Administration (HRA) in the sum of $1,762, were not properly credited toward payment of the judgment.</p><p>Upon the record before us, we are unable to determine whether tenant was given credit for the security deposit or the alleged payment by HRA in the sum of $1,762. Accordingly, the order denying tenant's motion to vacate the income execution is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new determination, following a hearing, of tenant's motion.</p><p>Aliotta, J.P., Pesce and Solomon, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: December 07, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Eric W. Golden, Bobby G. Jenkins and Barry F.
Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the PANAVISION INC. (the
"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and
on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or
officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any
instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the
Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of
attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable
securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents
this 30th day of March, 2004.




                                                      /S/ RONALD O. PERELMAN
                                                     --------------------------
                                                     RONALD O. PERELMAN
# C_2016231EN.01002001.xml

| 25.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/20

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 June 2016

(2016/C 231/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1066 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4371 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80750 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4610 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0808 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,103 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 317,90 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4550 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5345 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2457 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4910 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4392 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5887 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5613 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4973 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 296,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7318 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3301 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5250 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 837,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5511 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,947 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,6282 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,085 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8063 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8811 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,2540 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1066

JPY

Japanese yen

113,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4371

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80750

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4610

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0808

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,103

HUF

Hungarian forint

317,90

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4550

RON

Romanian leu

4,5345

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2457

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4910

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4392

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5887

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5613

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4973

KRW

South Korean won

1 296,89

ZAR

South African rand

16,7318

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3301

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5250

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 837,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5511

PHP

Philippine peso

51,947

RUB

Russian rouble

72,6282

THB

Thai baht

39,085

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8063

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8811

INR

Indian rupee

75,2540

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah L. Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-07755 Filed 4-1-15; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 6735-01-P