alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex10_3.htm




EXHIBIT 10.3







RESIGNATION


 



 


To the Board of Directors of


Accelerated Acquisitions XXII, Inc.


a Delaware corporation







The undersigned, being an officer and director of the above-named corporation, does hereby resign from President, Secretary, Treasurer, and as a Director of the Company.







Said resignation is contingent and expressly conditioned upon (a) the sale of 23,350,000 shares of the Company’s common shares to NorthShore Variables LLC and (b) the appointment of successor directors and officers of the corporation. 







Said resignation shall be effective on the date of the Closing of the transaction contemplated by the Subscription Agreements between the Company and NorthShore Variables LLC.


 




 


Dated as of April 19, 2013


/S/ Timothy Neher


Timothy Neher
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.3

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Glenn P. Dickes, Scott L. Seybold and Barry F.
Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact
and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and in his name, place and
stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the PANAVISION INC. (the
"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and
on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or
officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any
instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the
Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits
thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of
attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable
securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in
and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or
could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 28th
day of March, 2001.



                                         /S/ EDWARD GREBOW
                                         ------------------
                                         Edward Grebow
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

TOMMY E. CRAWFORD,

Claimant-Appellant

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee

______________________ 

2016-1681

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 14-3920, Judge Mary J. Schoelen.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MAXWELL DOUGLAS KINMAN, Alexander, Webb, and 

Kinman, Mason, OH, argued for claimant-appellant.

JAMES R. SWEET, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil 

Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR.,

SCOTT D. AUSTIN; Y. KEN LEE, JONATHAN KRISCH, Office of 

General Counsel, United States Department of Veterans 

Affairs, Washington, DC. 
 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 8, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 2, 2016

No. 04-16-00307-CV

JAMRO LTD.,

Appellant

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-21267

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s unopposed motion for a continuance and to reset the date for oral arguments

is GRANTED. The cause is reset for formal submission and oral argument before this Court on 

February 2, 2017, at 9:00 a.m., before a panel consisting of Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, 

Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, and Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sangui Biotech International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas Striepe, Chief Executive Officer and I, Joachim Fleing, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Dated: May 2, 2011 /s/ Thomas Striepe By: Thomas Striepe Chief Executive Officer  Dated: May 2, 2011 /s/ Joachim Fleing By: Joachim Fleing Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Cite as Saini v. Cook, 2016-Ohio-8067.]

COURT OF APPEALS 

FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO 

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

PARDEEP SINGH SAINI : JUDGES: 

SOUTHEASTERN CORR. INST. : 

 : Hon., William B. Hoffman P.J. 

 Petitioner : Hon., Sheila G. Farmer J. 

 : Hon., Patricia A. Delaney, J. 

-vs- : 

 : 

BRIAN COOK, WARDEN : Case No. 15-CA-58 

SOUTHEASTERN CORR. INST. : 

 : 

 Respondent : O P I N I O N 

CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Writ of Habeas Corpus 

JUDGMENT: Dismissed 

DATE OF JUDGMENT: December 2, 2016 

APPEARANCES: 

For Relator: Pro Se For Respondent: 

Pardeep Saini #687093 Michael DeWine 

Southeastern Correctional Inst. Ohio Attorney General 

5900 BIS Rd. Maura O’Neill Jaite (0058524) 

Lancaster, Ohio 43130 Senior Assistant Attorney General 

 Ohio Attorney General’s Office 

 Criminal Justice Section 

 150 East Gay Street, 16th Floor 

 Columbus, Ohio 43215 

 

 
Fairfield County, Case No. 15-58 2 

Hoffman, J. 

{¶1} Petitioner Pardeep Singh Saini has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus claiming he is entitled to release from prison because (1) his right to counsel was 

violated, and (2) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. Respondent has filed a 

Motion to Dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may granted and in the 

alternative, a motion for summary judgment. 

{¶2} Respondent avers Petitioner has presented a materially false affidavit of 

prior civil actions. R.C. 2969.25 requires an incarcerated litigant to file an affidavit 

detailing all civil actions filed within the last five years. The affidavit presented by 

Petitioner fails to include a prior case Petitioner initiated in this Court. Further, 

Respondent maintains Petitioner has also filed a federal habeas action which was not 

included in the affidavit. Although the affidavit is incomplete, we will address the merits 

of the petition. 

{¶3} All of the claims raised by Petitioner are couched in terms of the denial of 

counsel and ineffective assistance of counsel. 

{¶4} The Supreme Court has explained neither “[c]laims involving the ineffective 

assistance of counsel [nor] the alleged denial of the right to counsel are . . . cognizable in 

habeas corpus,” Bozsik v. Hudson, 110 Ohio St.3d 245, 2006-Ohio-4356, 852 N.E.2d 

1200, ¶ 7. 

{¶5} Because the claims raised by Petitioner are not cognizable in habeas 

corpus, we grant the motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a claim upon 

which relief may be granted. 
Fairfield County, Case No. 15-58 3 

By Hoffman, P. J. 

Farmer, J. and 

Delaney, J. concur. 

 

 

 
[Cite as Saini v. Cook, 2016-Ohio-8067.]
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Superclick, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending January 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Periodic
Report"), I, Sandro Natale, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. the Periodic Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Dated:  March 6, 2006                    /s/ Sandro Natale
                                         -----------------------
                                         Name:  Sandro Natale
                                         Title:  Interim Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 4.9

 

Power of Attorney

 

THIS POWER OF ATTORNEY (hereinafter, the “Power of Attorney”) is executed by Zuyu DING (Domicile [*], ID card No.: [*]) as of September 10, 2011 and issued to Xin ZHOU (Domicile [*], ID card No.: [*]) (hereinafter, the “Entrusted Person”).

 

I, Zuyu DING, hereby entrust the Entrusted Person with full representative power to exercise the following rights owned by me in the capacity of a shareholder of Beijing Yisheng Leju Information Services Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “Company”) on my behalf:

 

(1)              As my representative, to propose to convene and attend shareholders’ meetings of the Company according to the articles of association of the Company;

 

(2)              As my representative, to exercise, on my behalf, voting rights on all matters requiring discussion or resolutions of the shareholders’ meetings of the Company, including without limitation, the appointment and election of the Company’s directors and other officers, who should be appointed and removed by the shareholders;

 

(3)              As my representative, to exercise other voting rights of a shareholder as specified in the articles of association of the Company (including any other shareholder voting rights as specified in the amended articles of association).

 

I hereby irrevocably confirm that this Power of Attorney shall continue to be valid until the Shareholder Voting Right Proxy Agreement executed by and between Shanghai SINA Leju Information Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter, the “WFOE”), the Company and the shareholders of the Company as of September 10, 2011 expires or is early terminated, unless the WFOE gives me a direction to replace the Entrusted Person.

 

Authorization is hereby made.

 

	
 
    	
Name:  Zuyu DING
    
	
 
    	
Signature:
    	
/s/ Zuyu DING
    
	
 
    	
Date: September 10, 2011
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

 v.

MARK NOOTH, 

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 15-35835

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-02283-JE

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, Chief Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 10, 2016

Portland, Oregon

Before: McKEOWN and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and DORSEY,**

District Judge.

 

In his federal habeas petition, Christopher Williams argues that his guilty

plea was not knowing and voluntary because he was incompetent to enter the plea. 

He also argues that the state trial court’s failure to raise his competency sua sponte

FILED

DEC 02 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Jennifer A. Dorsey, United States District Judge for

the District of Nevada, sitting by designation.
violated his due process rights. The district court denied Williams’s habeas

petition but issued a certificate of appealability. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

We review de novo a district court’s decision to grant or deny a petition for a

writ of habeas corpus. Lambert v. Blodgett, 393 F.3d 943, 964 (9th Cir. 2004). 

However, “[f]actual findings and credibility determinations made by the district

court in the context of granting or denying the petition are reviewed for clear

error.” Id. Because no state court has adjudicated Williams’s claims on the merits,

the deferential standard of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) does not apply and review is de

novo. See James v. Ryan, 733 F.3d 911, 914 (9th Cir. 2013).

The district court did not clearly err in concluding that Williams was

competent when he entered his guilty plea. A defendant is incompetent when he

lacks either the “sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a

reasonable degree of rational understanding” or “a rational as well as factual

understanding of the proceedings against him.” Dusky v. United States, 362 U.S.

402, 402 (1960) (per curiam) (internal quotation marks omitted). While the

psychiatric reports in the record indicate that Williams likely suffered from

significant mental health issues, they also reflect the possibility that Williams was

malingering and being purposefully noncooperative. The district court closely

2
reviewed the record and reasonably determined that Williams was competent to

enter the plea.

Additionally, the state trial court’s failure to inquire into Williams’s

competency did not violate his due process rights. A trial court is required to “sua

sponte inquire into a defendant’s competency if a reasonable judge would be

expected to have a bona fide doubt as to the defendant’s competence.” Clark v.

Arnold, 769 F.3d 711, 729 (9th Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted). On

this record, a reasonable judge could have lacked a bona fide doubt as to

Williams’s competence. 

AFFIRMED.

3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               1
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                     8,680
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     19,210
<COMMON>                                     7,127,785
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                       1
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                377,460
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (349,979)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (377,460)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (349,979)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Rupprecht Law P. A. 

324 Datura Street, Suite 200 | West Palm Beach, FL 33401 

P: (561) 222-6979 | E: jon@jrupprechtlaw.com | W: www.jrupprechtlaw.com 

June 10, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE, 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sir or Madam:

Precision Aerial Filmworks, Inc.’s Motion Picture and TV Operating Manual has been 

confidentially submitted to 333exemptions@faa.gov on June 10, 2015. If I can be of any assistance to 

further expedite this petition, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561)222-6979 or at my email 

jon@jrupprechtlaw.com

Sincerely yours,

_____________________

Jonathan Rupprecht, Esq.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 58 (Thursday, March 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16022]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLMT924000-L1430000-ET0000; SDM 104697]


Public Land Order No. 7831; Transfer of Administrative 
Jurisdiction, Wind Cave National Park Addition; South Dakota

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Public land order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This order transfers administrative jurisdiction over 76.60 
acres of public lands from the Bureau of Land Management to the 
National Park Service for administration as part of the Wind Cave 
National Park in Custer County, South Dakota.

DATES: Effective Date: March 26, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doris Morrow, National Park Service, 
601 Riverfront Drive, Omaha, Nebraska 68102-4226, 402-661-1784, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#45212a372c361a282a37372a32052b35366b222a33"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9bfff4e9f2e8c4f6f4e9e9f4ecdbf5ebe8b5fcf4ed">[email protected]</span></a>, or Tamara Lorenz, Bureau of Land Management, 5001 
Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, 406-896-5053, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#186c74776a7d766258756c367a7475367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="285c44475a4d465268455c064a4445064f475e">[email protected]</span></a>. Persons who use a telecommunications device for the 
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
800-877-8339 to reach the Bureau of Land Management or National Park 
Service contact. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 
to leave a message or question with either of the above individuals. 
You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public Law 109-71, enacted September 21, 
2005, revised the Wind Cave National Park boundary and directed the 
Secretary of the Interior to transfer administrative jurisdiction of 
the public lands described in this order to the National Park Service 
for administration as part of Wind Cave National Park.

Order

    By virtue of the authority vested in the Secretary of the Interior 
and as directed by Public Law 109-71 (119 Stat. 2011) (2005), it is 
ordered as follows:
    Administrative jurisdiction of the following described lands is 
hereby transferred from the Bureau of Land Management to the National 
Park Service:

Black Hills Meridian, South Dakota

T. 5 S., R. 6 E.,
    Sec. 28, SW\1/4\SW\1/4\.
T. 6 S., R. 6 E.,
    Sec. 30, lot 1.

    The areas described aggregate 76.60 acres in Custer County.

    Dated: March 7, 2014.
Janice M. Schneider,
Assistant Secretary--Land and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2015-07000 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>