alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32



CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
 TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
 connection with the report on Form 10-Q ofMontana
 Mining Corp. forthe quarterly period ended March 31,
 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,Ruairidh
 Campbell, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

| | (1) | Thisreport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in this report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of
the registrant for the period covered by this report.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date:
 May10, 2010



/s/
 Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh
 Campbell

Chief
 Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



Thiscertification
 accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
 except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the
 registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report),
 irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.   A signed original of this written
 statement required by §906 has been provided to the registrant
 and will be retained by the registrant
 and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



23
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    the Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
    
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/  Michael K. RobinsonMichael K. RobinsonChief Executive Officer, President and Assistant Treasurer  28
#### LYMAN H. BALDWIN, *Plaintiff in*Error, *vs.*JOHN MARYGOLD and PATRICK DONAHU, *Defendants in Error.*

ERROR TO CALUMET COUNTY COURT.

The statute of 1853, in relation to change of venue, is imperative upon the judge or court.

The court has no discretion to grant or deny the petition, if it he in conformity •with the provisions of the statute.

Seasonable notice of an application for change of venue is sufficient,

where .the petition was presented in open court, in the'presence of the counsel of the adverse party: held sufficient notice.

• This was an action Brought before a justice of the peace of Calumet county by the plaintiff in error against the defendants in error, to recover a balance due on book account, where he obtained judgment, from which the defendants appealed to the County Court. On the first day of the next succeeding term the plaintiff in error filed in said court his petition for a change of venue, on account that the judge was prejudiced. This motion was resisted by the defendants below, on the ground that they had not received previous notice, and the Court overruled the petition. The plaintiff suffered judgment to go against him by default, and judgment was rendered in favor of the defendants below for costs. To reverse which this writ of error is now brought.

*It. P. Eaton*for the plaintiff in error.

*E. 8. Bragg*for the defendant in error.

*By the Oourt,*

Smith, J.

The error complained of in this case is, the refusal of the County Court to *420C^ange the venue on tlie petition of the plaintiff in who was plaintiff below.

brought an action of assumpsit, founded on book account, against the defendant, before a justice of the peace of Calumet county, and obtained judgment for $57.19. The defendants appealed to the County Court. On the first day of the next term the plaintiff filed his petition and affidavit for a change of venue, on account of the prejudice of the judge. The petition was opposed by the defendant’s attorneys, who were then in court, the petition being presented in open court, on the ground that they had not had eight days’ notice of the petition.

Seasonable notice is all that is required, and when a petition of this kind is presented in open court, in the presence of the attorney or counsel of the adverse party, it is sufficient notice of the filing. If time is desired to prepare for the hearing, it may doubtless be had on application. If the application be made in vacation, of course another kind of notice is necessary’ and what would be reasonable notice must depend upon the circumstances of the case.

The statute of 1858, *{Session laws, p.*51) is imperative upon the judge or court, and the venue should have been changed in accordance with the prayer of the petition, and with the provisions of the Statute. The court had no discretion in the premises and by proceeding afterwards to “ default” or non-suit the plaintiff, the court acted without authority, and the judgment is therefore erroneous.

The judgment of the County Court is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded, with directions to the County Court to order a change of venue in accordance with the prayer of the petition.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-40516

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MALONE BURNS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-135-1

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Malone Burns appeals the 188-month sentence imposed for his conviction

for possession with intent to distribute cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a)(1). In his sole issue on appeal, he contends that the district court erred

by refusing to apply the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA) to his sentence. His

argument is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Tickles, 661 F.3d 212,

215 (5th Cir. 2011), petitions for cert. filed (Dec. 15, 2011) (No. 11-8023) and

(Dec. 27, 2011) (No. 11-8268), which held that the FSA does not apply

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-40516 Document: 00511823818 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
No. 11-40516

retroactively to defendants whose sentencing occurred after the FSA’s effective

date but whose offenses occurred before the effective date. Although the

Supreme Court has recently granted certiorari in two Seventh Circuit cases that

held that the FSA does not apply retroactively, our precedent is nevertheless

binding. See United States v. Lopez-Velasquez, 526 F.3d 804, 808 n.1 (5th Cir.

2008).

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2

Case: 11-40516 Document: 00511823818 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/17/2012
Exhibit 32


                           Section 1350 Certifications
     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     with Respect to the North Valley Bancorp Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                      for the Quarter ended March 31, 2004

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of North Valley Bancorp, a California corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

         1.       The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended March 31, 2004 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





Dated: May 7, 2004                       /s/ MICHAEL J. CUSHMAN
       -----------                       ----------------------------------
                                         Michael J. Cushman
                                         President and Chief
                                         Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: May 7, 2004                       /s/ EDWARD J. CZAJKA
       -----------                       ----------------------------------
                                         Edward J. Czajka
                                         Executive Vice President
                                         and Chief Financial Officer
                                         (Principal Financial Officer)

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to North Valley Bancorp and will be retained by North Valley
Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

                                       213
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 45973

STATE OF IDAHO

,

Plaintiff

- Respondent

,

v.

K ENNY THOMAS MC DONALD

,

Defendant

- Appellant

. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Filed: January 15, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Jonathan Medema , District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of forty years, with a minimum period of confinement of seventeen years, for robbery, affirmed

.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Justin M. Curtis , Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lo ri A. Fleming , Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;
and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Kenny Thomas McDonald pled guilty to robbery . Idaho Code §§ 18

- 6501, 18

- 6502 . The

district court sentenced McDonald to a unified te rm of forty years with seventeen years

determinate

. McDonald appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing

and excessive sentence

. Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez , 121 Idaho 114, 117

- 18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014

-
15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez , 106 Idaho 447, 449

- 51, 680 P.2d 869, 871

- 73 (Ct. App.2 1984); State v. Toohill , 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver , 144 Idaho

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, McDonald ’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit
23.2





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






PLX
Technology, Inc.








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Prospectus
constituting a part of this Registration Statement of our reports dated March 5,
2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements, the effectiveness of
PLX Technology, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, and schedule
of PLX Technology, Inc. appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.




We also
consent to the reference to us under the caption “Experts” in the
Prospectus.






/s/ BDO
Seidman, LLP





BDO
Seidman, LLP


San
Francisco, California


June 1,
2009
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWERS OF ATTORNEY
                               MAZEL STORES, INC.

       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that MAZEL STORES, INC., an Ohio
corporation, and each person whose name is signed below hereby constitutes and
appoints Peter Hayes and Edward Cornell, and each of them, their
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for and on behalf of Mazel Stores, Inc. and the undersigned
directors and/or officers of Mazel Stores, Inc., and each of such directors and
officers, to sign the Mazel Stores, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended February 2, 2002, and any and all amendments thereto, and
related documents, and to file the same, with Exhibits thereto and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting such attorneys-in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary in connection with
such matters and hereby ratifying and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact
and agents or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

       This Power of Attorney of Mazel Stores, Inc., and the directors and
officers of Mazel Stores, Inc. may be executed in multiple and counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing
it.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed this 3rd day
of May 2002.

      MAZEL STORES, INC.                 By: /s/ Peter J. Hayes
                                            ---------------------
                                                 Peter J. Hayes,
                                                 Chairman of the Board and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:

/s/ Edward Cornell
-----------------------
Edward Cornell
Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President

 /s/ Reuven Dessler               /s/ William A. Shenk
----------------------------     ---------------------------
     Reuven Dessler,                  William A. Shenk
     Director

/s/  Brady Churches               /s/ Jacob Koval
----------------------------     ---------------------------
     Brady Churches                   Jacob Koval

/s/  Jerry Sommers                /s/ Mark Miller
----------------------------     ---------------------------
     Jerry Sommers                    Mark Miller

 /s/  Ned L. Sherwood             /s/ Charles Bilezikian
----------------------------     ---------------------------
      Ned L. Sherwood                 Charles Bilezikian

 /s/  Robert Horne                /s/ Joseph Nusim
----------------------------    ----------------------------
      Robert Horne                    Joseph Nusim
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 3086 

To require the Energy Information Administration to submit to Congress 

and make publicly available an annual report on Federal agency policies 

and regulations and Executive orders that have increased or may increase 

energy prices in the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 27, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida (for himself, Mr. MARSHALL, Ms. LUMMIS, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. JOHNSON, Mr. MORAN, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Energy Information Administration to submit 

to Congress and make publicly available an annual report 

on Federal agency policies and regulations and Executive 

orders that have increased or may increase energy prices 

in the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Give Americans Sta5 bility at Pumps as Rising Inflation Causes Emergencies 

6 Act’’ or the ‘‘GAS PRICE Act’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3086 IS

1 SEC. 2. REPORT ON POLICIES, REGULATIONS, AND EXECU2 TIVE ORDERS AFFECTING ENERGY PRICES. 

3 Not later than 60 days after the date of enactment 

4 of this Act, and every year thereafter, the Energy Infor5 mation Administration shall submit to Congress and make 

6 publicly available a report detailing each Federal agency 

7 policy or regulation and each Executive order with an ef8 fective date of January 20, 2021, or later that the Energy 

9 Information Administration determines has increased or 

10 may increase energy prices in the United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
21865 Copley Drive

Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4178Dear Dr. Liu:

Thank you for your timely submission of the 2008 South Coast Air Quality

Management District’s Annual Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan in July, 2009. We

have reviewed the submitted document and have found that the plan is complete,

informative, very detailed and meets all of the requirements for annual network plans as

required by our regulations set forth under 40 CFR Part 58.10. We also specifically

approve the proposed network changes as discussed on pages 8 - 9 of the submitted plan.

If you have any questions regarding this letter or the enclosed comments, please

feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4226 or Meredith Kurpius at (415) 947-4534.

/ Sinoçrely, //

JQph pka, Acting Manager

,

Air DivisionAir ality Analysis Office

cc: Dr. Phil Fine, SCAQMD

Meredith Kurpius

Printed on Recycled Paper
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Planton Tzouvalis, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|1. | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Acrongenomics Inc.
      for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Acrongenomics Inc.                                                                

Date: August 20, 2010

| | /s/
      Platon Tzouvalis   
| | -----------------------------
| | Platon Tzouvalis             
| | President and Director       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

---
Exhibit
13.2




CARTHEW
BAY TECHNOLOGIES INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Carthew Bay Technologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Brian D. Clewes, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Brian D. ClewesBrian
      D. ClewesSecretary,
      Treasurer, and Chief Financial OfficerSeptember
      15, 2010
ex4_3.htm


Exhibit 4.3




 


Dear   Mr. Yu Chun Ming(余春明):


 


It is my pleasure to extend the following offer of employment to you on behalf of Maxclean Holdings Ltd.


 


Title:      Interim Chief Executive Officer.


 


Reporting Relationship: The position will report to:


 


Board of Directors


 


Job Goals:


 


To manage and develop the sales, production and the whole operation of the Company to achieve the following target net profit for the coming years:


 


2013 - Targeted Net Profit of RMB 5 millions


 


2014 - Targeted Net Profit of RMB 10 millions


 


2015 - Targeted Net Profit of RMB 20 millions


 


Base Salary:  Will be paid monthly of US$8,000  which is equivalent to US$96,000  on an annual basis.


 


Vacation and Personal Emergency Time Off: Vacation is accrued at 21 days on an annual basis. Personal emergency days are generally accrued per company policy.


 


Phone/Travel Allowance: Normal and reasonable expenses will be reimbursed on a monthly basis per company policy and upon completion of the appropriate expense request form.


 



	Start Date:  	04/09/2013	 





 




  





  











  






 


Your employment with Maxclean Holdings Ltd. is at-will and either party can terminate the relationship with 1 month notice.


 


You acknowledge that this offer letter, along with the final form of any referenced documents (such Stock Repurchase Plan, Job Description, Bonus Goals, etc.), represents the entire agreement between you and Maxclean Holdings Ltd. and that no verbal or written agreements, promises or representations that are not specifically stated in this offer, are or will be binding upon Maxclean Holdings Limited.


 


If you are in agreement with the above outline, please sign below. This offer is in effect for five days.


 


 







 


 


 


Signatures:


 


 


 


 



	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	(Maxclean Holdings Ltd.) 	 	(Mr. Yu Chun Ming余春明)
	 	 	 
	

Date:04/09/2013