alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 24.2**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E.Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, and J. Christopher Kirk and each of them, his trueand lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution andresubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and to sign anyor all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each andevery act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do inperson, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-factor their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof.

 

 
|   | /s/ ARLIN  E. GAFFNER |   |
|--------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Arlin  E. Gaffner     |   |

 

----
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-16-00365-CV

CLYDE F. HILL,

Appellant

v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR BY MERGER 

TO CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 1

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 20160637CV1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Clyde F. Hill appeals from a summary judgment rendered against him on a 

petition for forcible detainer and issued on August 1, 2016. By letter dated November 16, 

2016, the Clerk of this Court notified Hill that his original filing fee for the appeal was 

past due. Hill was warned in the same letter that failure to pay the filing fee within 10 

days from the date of the letter would result in the appeal being dismissed. See TEX. R.
Hill v. JPMorgan Chase Bank Page 2

APP. P. 42.3(c). More than 10 days have passed, and Hill has failed to pay his original 

filing fee.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Id.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 7, 2016

[CV06]
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-3859

___________ Raymond Gearhart, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Missouri. Marty C. Anderson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: May 6, 2011 Filed: June 16, 2011

___________ Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Raymond Gearhart is involuntarily committed under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 , and is confined at the United States Medical Cen ter for Federal Prisoners in Springfield, Missouri. He filed this pro se civil ac tion complaining, among other things, that he was being forced to take antipsychotic drugs . The district court construed the action as a petition for a writ of habeas corpus and denied relief after considering the government’s evidence. To the extent that Mr. Gearhart’s pleadings sounded in habeas corpus, we agree that his custody was lawful for the reasons the district court stated.As we review Mr. Gearhart’s filings, however, we conclude that the gravamen of his complaint was a challenge to the lawfulness of his forced medication, which could be raised as a Bivens 1 action, seePapantony v. Hedrick , 215 F.3d 863, 864-65 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), or as a c onstitutional claim for injunctive relief, see Simmat v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons , 413 F.3d 1225, 1231-32, 1236 (10th Cir. 2005); see also Washington v. Harper , 494 U.S. 210 (1990). Thus, we remand for the district court to consider such claims after affo rding Mr. Gearhart anopportunity to amend his complaint. Cf. Young v. Armontrout , 795 F.2d 55, 56 (8th Cir. 1986) (remanding to district court with instructions to treat pro se habeas petition as 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and to grant leave to amend co mplaint liberally as justice requires). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’ s denial of habeas relief, and otherwise remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

______________________________

1 Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). -2-
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 9074]

      ( print page 17541)    
The United States actively supports efforts to provide protection, assistance, and durable solutions for refugees. The U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is a critical component of the United States' overall refugee protection efforts around the globe. In Fiscal Year 2015, the President established the ceiling for refugee admissions into the United States at 70,000 refugees.

                    As we begin to prepare the FY 2016 U.S. Refugee Admission Program, we welcome the public's input. Information about the Program can be found at                     *http://www.state.gov/​g/​prm/​*. Persons wishing to submit written comments on the appropriate size and scope of the FY 2016 U.S. Refugee Admissions Program should submit them by 5 p.m. on Thursday, May 14, 2015 via email to                     *spruellda@state.gov*                     or fax (202) 453-9393.                

                    If you have questions about submitting written comments, please contact Delicia Spruell, PRM/Admissions Program Officer at                     *spruellda@state.gov.*

Dated: March 25, 2015.

Simon Henshaw,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2015-07460 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-33-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREA VILLA BELLO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 05-75947

Agency No. A095-306-083

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 19, 2010** 

Before: O’SCANNLAIN, TALLMAN, and BEA, Circuit Judges. 

Andrea Villa Bello, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily dismissing her appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for

cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. §1252. We

FILED

OCT 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 05-75947

review for substantial evidence the BIA’s determination of continuous physical

presence. Landin-Zavala v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 1150, 1151 (9th Cir. 2007). We

deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Bello was

ordered expeditiously removed in 1998 under the name Theresa Martinez Lopez,

which she conceded was her alias, and that Bello therefore did not meet the

continuous physical presence requirement for cancellation of removal. See

Juarez-Ramos v. Gonzales, 485 F.3d 509, 511-12 (9th Cir. 2007) (holding that an

expedited removal order interrupts an alien’s continuous physical presence for

cancellation purposes). Substantial evidence also supports the agency’s

determination that Bello had not accrued ten years of continuous physical presence

at the time she was served with the Notice to Appear (“NTA”) in April 2002. See

8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(1).

We lack jurisdiction to review Bello’s challenge to the IJ’s denial of her

request for a continuance because Bello failed to exhaust this issue before the BIA. 

See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
3 05-75947
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries of Simon Property Group, L.P.

|Subsidiary                                                     |  | Jurisdiction  
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|The Retail Property Trust                                      |  | Massachusetts 
|Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.                          |  | Illinois      
|Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.                             |  | Texas         
|Shopping Center Associates                                     |  | New York      
|Simon Capital Limited Partnership                              |  | Delaware      
|M.S. Management Associates, Inc.                               |  | Delaware      
|Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd.                                       |  | Bermuda       
|Marigold Indemnity, Ltd.                                       |  | Delaware      
|Simon Business Network, LLC                                    |  | Delaware      
|Simon Brand Ventures, LLC                                      |  | Indiana       
|Simon Global Limited                                           |  | United Kingdom
|Simon Services, Inc.                                           |  | Delaware      
|Simon Property Group Administrative Services Partnership, L.P. |  | Delaware      
|SPGGC, Inc.                                                    |  | Virginia      
|Kravco Simon Investments, L.P.                                 |  | Pennsylvania  
|Kravco Simon Company                                           |  | Pennsylvania  
|Simon Management Associates, LLC                               |  | Delaware      
|CPG Partners, L.P.                                             |  | Delaware      

Omits
names of subsidiaries that as of December 31, 2006 were not, in the aggregate, a "significant subsidiary."

119

---



QuickLinks
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-20-00253-CR

__________________

CODEY PAUL BARNES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 19-06-07983-CR

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Codey Paul Barnes1 appealed from a sentence, which the court pronounced 

on September 18, 2020. The notice of appeal that Barnes filed in the trial court 

showed he filed the appeal on November 5, 2020, a date more than thirty days from 

the date the trial court sentenced him, which is beyond the time in which he could 

have requested an extension in which he could have filed a timely appeal. And the 

1

Barnes’ first name is spelled “Cody” on the notice of appeal. 
2

record does not demonstrate that Barnes qualifies for the extended deadlines since it 

fails to show he moved for a new trial. 

On November 9, 2020, we notified the parties that Barnes’ notice of appeal 

did not appear to have been timely filed. Barnes did not respond to the notice. We 

find Barnes did not file a timely notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2. He also 

did not file a timely request to extend the appellate deadlines pursuant to Rule 26.3. 

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. It also does not appear that Barnes obtained permission from 

the Court of Criminal Appeals to file an out-of-time appeal. 

We find the Court is without jurisdiction to entertain Barnes’ appeal. For that 

reason, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 29, 2020

Opinion Delivered December 30, 2020

Do Not Publish 

Before McKeithen, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Patrick J. Kealy,
Chief Executive Officer of Star Energy Corporation (the Company), certifies,
under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and information contained in that Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                    |                            
|------------------- | ---------------------------
|Date: June 18, 2007 | Patrick J. Kealy           
|                    | Patrick J. Kealy           
|                    | Chief Executive Officer and
|                    | President (Principal       
|                    | Executive Officer)         

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
**Exhibit 31.2**

I, Carol Yu, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sohu.com Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this reportis being prepared; 

b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generallyaccepted accounting principles; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Dated: August 8, 2006
EXHIBIT 24.1

                               POWERS OF ATTORNEY
                               ODD JOB STORES, INC.

       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that ODD JOB STORES, INC., an Ohio
corporation, and each person whose name is signed below hereby constitutes and
appoints Steve Furner and Edward Cornell, and each of them, their attorneys-in-
fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and on
behalf of Odd Job Stores, Inc. and the undersigned directors and/or officers of
Odd Job Stores, Inc., and each of such directors and officers, to sign the Odd
Job Stores, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the eleven months ended
December 31, 2002, and any and all amendments thereto, and related documents,
and to file the same, with Exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting such attorneys-
in-fact and agents full power and authority to do and perform each and every act
and thing requisite and necessary in connection with such matters and hereby
ratifying and confirming all that such attorneys-in-fact and agents or their
substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

       This Power of Attorney of Odd Job Stores, Inc., and the directors and
officers of Odd Job Stores, Inc. may be executed in multiple and counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original with respect to the person executing
it.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed this 21st day
of March 2003.

      ODD JOB STORES, INC.                 By: /s/ Steve Furner
                                            ---------------------
                                             Steve Furner,
                                             Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS:

/s/ Edward Cornell
-----------------------
Edward Cornell
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

 /s/ Reuven Dessler               /s/ Philip Carter
----------------------------     ---------------------------
     Reuven Dessler,                  Philip Carter,
     Director                         Director

/s/  Jacob Koval                  /s/ Mark Miller
----------------------------     ---------------------------
     Jacob Koval,                     Mark Miller,
     Director                         Director

 /s/  Ned L. Sherwood             /s/ Charles Bilezikian
----------------------------     ---------------------------
      Ned L. Sherwood,                Charles Bilezikian,
      Director                        Director

 /s/  Robert Horne                /s/ Joseph Nusim
----------------------------    ----------------------------
      Robert Horne,                   Joseph Nusim,
      Director                        Director
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Barry D. Michaels, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cardima, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date:  March 31, 2005