alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32



Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NYMEX Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Mitchell Steinhause as Principal Executive Officer of the Company, and Kenneth D.
Shifrin, as Principal Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:  November 8,
2005



By:

/s/    MITCHELL
STEINHAUSEName:

Mitchell SteinhauseTitle:

Chairman (Principal Executive
Officer)




Date:  November 8, 2005



By:

/s/    KENNETH D.
SHIFRINName:

Kenneth D. ShifrinTitle:

Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Financial Officer)
[Crim. No. 1799.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

July 10, 1934.]

#### THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. THOMAS SCHEFFEL, Appellant.

*629No appearance for Appellant.

U. S. Webb, Attoiney-Goneral, and Seibert L. Sefton, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.

SCHMIDT, J., *pro tem.*

In the above-entitled matter the attorney-general has moved that the judgment and order appealed from be affirmed as no briefs have been filed by appellant.

Although no briefs have been filed we have read the entire record. The evidence amply sustains the verdict of the jury finding the defendant guilty of violating chapter 339, section 1, of the, Statutes of 1923 as charged in count one of the indictment filed in the lower court. The record does not disclose any reversible error.

Judgment affirmed.

Nourse, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.1

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                  KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Glenn P. Dickes, Joseph P. Page, Scott L.
Seybold and Barry F. Schwartz or any of them, each acting alone, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and
in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
PANAVISION INC. (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1999 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form
10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the
undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to
the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in
connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with
all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including
this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any
applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto
said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might
or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents
this 22nd day of March, 2000.


                                        /S/ RONALD O. PERELMAN
                                        ----------------------
                                        RONALD O. PERELMAN
**EXHIBIT 32.2****(1)**

**STATEMENTOF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

I, Ken Owyang, the chieffinancial officer of SupportSoft, Inc. (the “Company”), certify for thepurposes of section 1350 of chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Codethat, to the best of my knowledge,
| (i)    |   | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for  the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the “Report”), fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
| (ii)   |   | the information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company.                                                              |

 
| Date: May 9, 2007 |                               |
|-------------------|------------------------------------|
| ** **        |                               |
| ** **        | /s/ KEN OWYANG                     |
|              | **Ken  Owyang**                    |
|              | **Chief  Financial Officer and**   |
|              | **Senior  Vice President**         |
|              | **of  Finance and Administration** |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by 18 U.S.C. § 1350 has been provided toSupportSoft, Inc. and will be retained by SupportSoft, Inc. and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

----

(1)                                     Thematerial contained in this Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC andis not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under theSecurities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether madebefore or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporationlanguage contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrantspecifically incorporates it by reference.

----
To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

From: Theresa Nguyen/DC/USEPA/US Date: 08/30/2010 11:11AM Subject: Re: Revised Substitute Data Percents John, I thought I sent this to you last week, but when checked my Sent box, it wasn't there. Sorry. Here it is.
PARAMETER CD TOTAL OPERATING TIME WITH SUBSTITUTE DATA TOTAL OPERATING TIME TOTAL SUBSTITUTE OPERATING TIME / TOTAL OPERATING TIME CO2C 37,727 7,725,372 0.5% FLOW 71,547 6,584,739 1.1% NOXC 35,208 12,231,074 0.3% NOXR 116,005 11,903,499 1.0% SO2C 74 ,487 6,028,639 1.2%

John Schakenbach --- 08/30/2010 11:06:28 AM ---Thuy, From: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US To: Theresa Nguyen/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 08/30/2010 11:06 AM Subject:Revised Substitute Data Percents
Thuy, Any luck with the revised d ata substitution percents? Last week we discussed that the substitute data operating time by parameter should be divided by the total operating time for all units having that parameter, instead of the total operating time for all units.
John Schakenbach U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Clean Air Markets Division schakenbach.john@epa.gov Phone: 202 - 343 - 9158 Fax: 202 - 343 - 2359
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

	In connection with the Annual Report of Camden Mines Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the
"report"), I, Hugh Grenfal, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

	Dated this 12th day of November, 2003.


/s/

_______________________________________
Hugh Grenfal, Jr.
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Jeffrey C. Smith, as Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/    JEFFREY C. SMITHJeffrey C. Smith Chief Executive Officer  June 4, 2003
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------



This certification
accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except underthe limited circumstancessetforth inLocalRule

47.5.4.

 

1

386 U.S. 738 (1967).

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-40772

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KENNETH WAYNE MITCHELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Eastern District of Texas

(1-95-CR-44)

March 1, 1996

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, GARWOOD and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kenneth Wayne Mitchell was convicted, pursuant to a guilty plea, of possession with

intent to distribute cocaine base and of distribution of same. He was sentenced as a career

offender to imprisonment for 151 months, the low end of the guideline range, together with

supervised release for three years. Mitchell directed his appointed counsel to notice an

appeal.

Mitchell’s appointed counsel has filed the brief mandated by Anders v. California1
2

and a motion to withdraw. On December 4, 1995, the clerk of this court notified Mitchell

of his right to file a response to counsel’s motion within 30 days. No response has been

filed.

Neitherthe brief nor our independentreview of the record discloses any nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. The motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is relieved of further

responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
#### Marcus v. Woods.

*Pleading and practice*— Practice *Act of 1915*— Affidavit *of defence*— Coun*ter-claim*— Notice—Expenses *of trial*— Damages.

1. A counter-claim alleging damages caused by the filing of the suit cannot be set-oil.

2. Under the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483, where an affidavit of defence is not endorsed and plaintiff not notified to reply, plaintiff is not required to reply and defendant cannot prove his set-off.

Rule to strike off counter-claim. C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1921, No. 715.

*Levy & Levy,*for plaintiff; *John F. Glockner,*for defendant.

Oct. 5, 1921.

Ford, J.,

This action is to recover commission *alleged*to be due on account of the sale of real estate. The answer filed by defendant denies that plaintiff was employed or that he procured a purchaser to whom the property was sold. He further alleges that he was damaged by the filing of this suit, said damage consisting of his loss of time, payment of witness fees and attorney’s fees, a total damage of $500, for which defendant asks a certificate.

The case is now before the court on a rule to show cause why the averments of the affidavit of defence relating to a set-off or counter-claim should not be stricken from the record. The affidavit was not endorsed, nor was plaintiff notified to reply thereto, in compliance with the Practice Act of May 14, 1915, P. L. 483. The cause is now at issue. The statement of damages is vague, indefinite and lacks the clearness necessary to make a complete set-off. It includes a reference to expenses not incurred and matters dependent upon the length of trial. There is force in the contention that damages caused by the “filing of this action” cannot be set off, otherwise such a counter-claim might be urged in any action. The affidavit not having been endorsed, plaintiff was not required to reply, nor has he made answer. On trial, the defendant could not prove his set-off; the mere averment could do plaintiff no harm. However, the set-off, as alleged, does not conform to the provisions of the Practice Act nor state a good cause of action, and the rule must, therefore, be made absolute.

*Order.*

And now, Oct. 5,1921, rule absolute, and so much of the affidavit of defence as reads “defendant claims damages from the said plaintiff for the filing of this suit, said damages consisting of his loss of time, payment of witness fees and attorney fees, total damages $500,” for which defendant asks a certificate, is stricken from the record, with leave to defendant to amend.

From Edwin *L.*Mattern, Pittsburgh, Pa.
February Crop Production

Executive Summary

Lance Honig, Chief

Crops Branch

February 9, 2021
Data Sources

February 9, 2021

Objective Measurement

Florida Citrus

Row Count

Florida Citrus

Utilization Florida Citrus Administrative Committee

Data Quantity of Fruit Packed or Processed

Field Surveys

1,613 Groves January 11-25

120,674 Rows January 26-27
February 9, 2021

February 2021 Citrus

Utilized Production

All Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↑ 2.0

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 11.4

Non-Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate ↑ 3.4

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 13.6

Valencia Oranges

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 7.9

Grapefruit

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 5.4

Lemons

% Change from Previous Estimate NC

% Change from Previous Season ↓ 5.8

Tangerines

% Change from Previous Estimate ↓ 0.2

% Change from Previous Season ↑ 4.5

970

4,624

2,725

1,899

564

1,036

Production

(1,000 Tons)

11.63

11.07

9.37 9.03 8.73

7.70

6.08

8.14 7.78

7.19

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

10.0

12.0

14.0

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Million Tons

All Citrus Production

United States

8.98

8.27

6.77

6.35 6.09

5.09

3.88

5.43 5.22

4.62

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

10.0

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Million Tons

All Orange Production

United States
February 9, 2021

2020 Field Crops

Acreage, Yield, and Production

Unit Unit

Sugarcane Ton Ton

% Change from Previous Estimate N/A ↑ 0.9 ↑ 0.5 ↑ 1.5

% Change from Previous Season N/A ↑ 3.9 ↑ 8.3 ↑ 12.7

Production

(1,000 Units)

N/A 949 37.9 35,985

Yield

(Units per Acre)

Harvested

(1,000 Acres)

Planted

(1,000 Acres)
Selected Upcoming Reports

February 9, 2021

https://www.nass.usda.gov/Publications/index.php

Farm Labor

Vegetables - Annual

Cattle on Feed

Farms and Land in Farms

County Estimates: Corn, Sorghum, Soybeans

Crop Values

February 26 Agricultural Prices

Cotton System - Monthly & Annual

Fats & Oils - Monthly & Annual

Grain Crushings - Monthly & Annual

March 4 County Estimates: Rice

Cotton Ginnings

Crop Production

February 11

February 19

March 9

February 25

March 1
USDA AGRICULTURAL OUTLOOK FORUM

February 9, 2021

Registration is Now Open to USDA's 97th Agricultural Outlook Forum!

Building on Innovation: A Pathway to Resilience

Join us for this virtual event on February 18-19, 2021

The Forum is free to attend

Register Today
#StatChat

February 9, 2021
All Reports Available At

www.nass.usda.gov

For Questions

(202) 720-2127

(800) 727-9540

nass@usda.gov
----

| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:           April 29, 2014 | CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                                                                   | (Registrant)             |
|                                                                                   |                     |   |
|                                                                                   | By:                      | /s/ Douglas J. McCrosson |
|                                                                                   |                     | Douglas J. McCrossonChief Executive Officer, President and Director(Principal executive officer) |

| Dated:           April 29, 2014 | CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                                                                   | (Registrant)             |
|                                                                                   |                     |   |
|                                                                                   | By:                      | /s/ Vincent Palazzolo |
|                                                                                   |                     | Vincent PalazzoloChief Financial Officer and Secretary(Principal financial and accounting officer) |

----
#### Andrew McClure, Appl’t, *v.*New York Central & Hudson River R. R. Co., Resp’t.

*(Supreme Court, General Term, Third Department,*

*Filed December,*1886.)

NEGLIGENCE — CONTRIBTJTOBY.

The plaintiff, while standing on defendant’s track at the end of one of the ties, bent forward so that the back part of his body protruded toward the rails, and while in this position he was struck by one of defendant’s engines, which was moving at low rate of speed, and injured thereby. *Held,*that the injury to plaintiff was caused by his own negligence.

*B. R. Heyward,*for appl’t; *Harris Rudd,*for resp’t

The plaintiff’s work was at a forge which stood on the north track of the bridge over the Hudson river at Troy. The south track was entirely completed and was being constantly used, locomotives passing every five minutes. Plaintiff and all the workmen had orders to look out for locomotives and to keep off the track. He left his forge on the north track, and crossed oyer on to the south and running track. In going over he looked both ways for locomotives and saw an engine at Green Island and another on the Troy side about the entrance of the draw. He stepped over on to the south track, and stood on the extreme southern end of one of the ties of that track, in a leaning position, with his left hand on his knee, looking down and talking with a man who was on a scaffold suspended below the tracks, at work riv#ing. In about two seconds after he reached the tie he looked up and down and saw two engines. The one at the east of him at the time he saw it last was about 30 or 40 feet from him. Plaintiff did not look again, but stood there twenty-eight seconds without looking when the engine either struck him or frightened him so that he sprung out from the ties ten or fifteen feet,- and fell upon some timbers on the water below.

The locomotive protruded about six inches over the rails so that there were at least twelve inches between the locomotive and the plaintiff if he had not leaned over.

By the Court.

We have examined the evidence in this *141case and there can be no doubt as to the facts. *We*think that the injury which happened to the plaintiff, was caused by his own negligence. The engine was moving very slowly — about four miles an hour. The plaintiff placed himself in a position of danger. He probably thought that, as he was at the extreme end of the tie, the engine would not touch him. And this might have been the case had he not. leaned forward and thus protruded the back part of his body, so that it came within the reach of the engine.

It does not seem to be necessary to go over the evidence in this opinion.

The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Bocees and LeabNed, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Xinhua  China  LTD.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Xianping  Wang,  Acting as  Interim  Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Dated: February 16, 2009


                                       By: /s/ XIANPING WANG
                                       _________________________________________
                                       Xianping Wang
                                       Acting as Interim Chief Financial Officer
^E; 

06/15/2011 '-Vlf' 

'L 

To; Docket Management Facility 

U.S. Department of Transportation -^'' '0 A IC- 59 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

From: Coastal Helicopters, LLC 

Lawrence Ihle 

PO Box 715 

Nags Head, NC 27959 

Office Phone: 252^75-4354/Fax: 252-441-9066 

Email: obxhelicopters@gmail.com 

To whom it may concern. 

On March 7, 2011 we were issued an exemption number 10220 that allows Coastal 

Helicopters, LLC to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug testing 

program. Please be advised that we are now petitioning the FAA to add OBX Biplanes 

to this exemption. 

OBX Biplanes, LLC, (LOA number OBBJ0001) is a sightseeing tour company that is 

being operated and controlled by Lawrence Ihle, manager of Coastal Helicopters, LLC. 

We find it simpler to include all covered employees under our current exemption, please 

take the appropriate action and advise us as soon as possible of your decision. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me anytime at the following: 

Cell 262-928-8074. Thank you very much. 

Sincerely, 

LawrenceThle 

Coastal Helicopters, LLC