alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

                    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this notice appears in the                     **Federal Register**                    . A copy of the agreement is available through the Commission's Web site (                    *www.fmc.gov*) or by contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or                     *tradeanalysis@fmc.gov*.                

*Agreement No.:*                     012324.                

*Title:*                     NMCC/Grimaldi Space Charter Agreement.                

*Parties:*                     Grimaldi Deep Sea S.p.A; Grimaldi Euromed S.p.A.; Nissan Motor Car Carrier Co., Ltd.; World Logistics Service (U.S.A.), Inc.                

*Filing Party:*                     Eric. C. Jeffrey, Esq.; Nixon Peabody LLP; 401 9th Street NW., Suite 900, Washington, DC 20004.                

*Synopsis:*                     The Agreement authorizes the parties to charter space to/from one another for the transportation of vehicles and other Ro/Ro cargo in the trade between the United States, on the one hand, and Europe, Africa, the Mediterranean, and the Middle East on the other hand.                

By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

Dated: March 27, 2015.

Karen V. Gregory, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-07487 Filed 4-1-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE CODE 6730-01-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0160. ALONZO Q. HILL v. CHANESTIA P. DAVIS.

Alonzo Hill seeks discretionary review of the superior court’s final order

granting sole legal and physical custody of his child to the child’s mother and

establishing a visitation schedule. Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (11), direct appeals are

permitted from “[a]ll judgments or orders in child custody cases awarding, refusing

to change, or modifying child custody or holding or declining to hold persons in

contempt of such child custody judgment or orders.” Thus, the order Hill seeks to

appeal is directly appealable.

Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j), this Court will grant a timely discretionary

application if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. Accordingly, this

application is hereby GRANTED. Hill shall have ten days from the date of this order

to file a notice of appeal with the superior court, if he has not already done so. The

clerk of the superior court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/29/2016

November 29, 2016
Exhibit
13.1




CARTHEW
BAY TECHNOLOGIES INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Carthew Bay Technologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Michael Liik, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Michael LiikMichael
      LiikPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerSeptember
      15, 2010
AFS-12-311-E 

May 25, 2012 

 Exemption No. 10545 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0399 

Mr. Michael D. Vollmer 

Director, Operations 

Dynamic Airways 

701 North Terminal Service Road 

Greensboro, NC 27409 

Dear Mr. Vollmer: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated April 3, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Dynamic Airways (Dynamic) for an exemption from § 121.434(c)(1)(ii) of Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations to the extent to allow Dynamic to substitute a qualified and 

authorized check airman in place of an FAA inspector to observe a qualifying pilot in 

command (PIC) while that PIC is performing prescribed duties during at least one flight leg 

that includes a takeoff and a landing when completing initial or upgrade training as specified 

in § 121.424. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to Dynamic. 

The FAA issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10430 (copy enclosed), the 

FAA found that a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest and would not 

provide a level of safety equivalent to that provided by the current regulations. The FAA 

considered it necessary to require the PIC to be observed by an FAA inspector during at least 

one flight leg of initial operating experience, which includes a takeoff and landing, if the 
2 

certificate holder uses a course of training in an airplane simulator as provided in § 

121.409(c). That requirement was set forth in Amendment 121-91 and has continued in effect 

until the present. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

 they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial 

of Exemption No. 10430; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 10430 

also apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Dynamic Airways for an exemption from 

14 CFR § 121.434(c)(1)(ii). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John S. Duncan 

Deputy Director, Flight Standards 

 Service 

Enclosure
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 60 (Monday, March 30, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16577]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07330]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

45 CFR Part 800

RIN 3206-AN12


Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Establishment of the 
Multi-State Plan Program for the Affordable Insurance Exchanges; 
Correction

AGENCY: Office of Personnel Management.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is correcting a final 
rule that appeared in the Federal Register of February 24, 2015 (80 FR 
9649). The document implementing modifications to the Multi-State Plan 
(MSP) Program based on the experience of the Program to date.

DATES: Effective March 26, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cameron Stokes by telephone at (202) 
606-2128, by FAX at (202) 606-4430, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1b76686b6b5b746b76357c746d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cf1efececdcf3ecf1b2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2015-03421, appearing on page 
9649 in the Federal Register of Tuesday, February 24, 2015, the 
following corrections are made:
    1. On page 9655, in the third column, the heading ``List of 
Subjects in 5 CFR part 800'' is revised to read, ``List of Subjects in 
45 CFR part 800.''
    2. On page 9655, in the third column, the last paragraph should be 
revised to read:
    ``Accordingly, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management is revising 
part 800 to title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, to read as 
follows:''

U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Steve Hickman,
Regulatory Affairs, Office of the Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2015-07330 Filed 3-26-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6325-64-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2




Section
1350Certificate of Chief Financial Officer


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summus, Inc.  (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald T. Locke, the
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:       May 13, 2005
    /s/ Donald T.
      LockeDonald T. LockeChief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.2
                                  ------------

              Commodore Environmental Services, Inc. & Subsidiaries
                    Certification Of Chief Financial Officer
           Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                  Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

         In  connection   with  the  annual   report  of  Commodore   Separation
Technologies,  Inc. (the  "Company") on form 10-KSB for the year ended  December
31, 2003, Andrew Oddi hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to the
best of his knowledge:

(3)      The annual report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)      The information  contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all
         material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Date:    March 29, 2004


/s/ Andrew Oddi
---------------
President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q OF VYYO INC. FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             331
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      170
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,168
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,976
<PP&E>                                             930
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,189
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     10,335
<COMMON>                                         2,649
<OTHER-SE>                                    (24,267)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,906
<SALES>                                            942
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   942
<CGS>                                              864
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      864
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   785
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (198)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,712)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,712)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,712)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.63)


</TABLE>
The HONORABLE SCOTT O. WRIGHT, United States District Judge for the 1

Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

HONORABLE WILLIAM A. KNOX, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3105

___________

Arizona Hall, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

George Lombardi; Cranston Mitchell; * Western District of Missouri.

R. Dale Riley; Myrna E. Trickey; John *

Bell; Ernest Cowles; Pat Smith; Jo * [UNPUBLISHED]

Ellen Jones, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: October 7, 1998

 Filed: October 16, 1998

___________

Before FAGG, BEAM, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Arizona Hall appeals the district court&s order dismissing his 1

42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 for failure to state a claim. In his
-2-

complaint, Hall alleged defendants improperly computed his conditional release date,

thereby causing him to suffer various deprivations of his constitutional rights. Having

carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the judgment of the district court is correct

and affirm for the reasons set forth in the district court&s order. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

We deny Hall&s motions on appeal as moot. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

APR 20, 2011

JOHN LEY

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-10187

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 6:08-cv-00749-JA-GJK

THOMAS C. RIDLEY,

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

SEARS HOME IMPROVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., 

d.b.a. Sears, Roebuck And Co.,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(April 20, 2011)

Before TJOFLAT, WILSON and SEYMOUR, Circuit Judges.

*

PER CURIAM:

 Honorable Stephanie K. Seymour, United States Circuit Judge for the Tenth Circuit, *

sitting by designation.
Thomas C. Ridley appeals the district court’s entry of partial summary

judgment in favor of Sears on his sexual harassment, race discrimination, and

constructive discharge claims, as well as a jury verdict for Sears on his retaliation

claim, all brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.

§ 2000e et seq. Ridley, an African American male, claimed he was sexually

harassed by his male supervisor, who displayed pictures and videos of himself

engaging in sex acts with Ridley’s female co-workers. Ridley also claimed the

same supervisor assigned sales leads in a racially discriminatory manner, giving

Ridley fewer “prime” leads than his non-African-American co-workers. 

After receiving evidence from both parties, the district court entered

summary judgment for Sears on all grounds, except Ridley’s retaliation claim. At

trial, the parties stipulated that Ridley engaged in protected activity; thus, he

would not introduce evidence of his underlying claims. The jury ultimately found

Sears did not retaliate against Ridley. 

Ridley raises four issues on appeal. First, he argues the district court

applied an inappropriate legal standard in determining that he was not sexually

harassed. Second, he contends the district court erroneously concluded that he

was not subjected to racial discrimination, despite direct and circumstantial

evidence to the contrary. Third, he argues his work environment was so

2
intolerable that he was forced to abandon his job, and the district court erred in

concluding otherwise. And finally, he contends that the district court unfairly

excluded evidence of his underlying sexual harassment and racial discrimination

claims from trial, depriving him of the ability to present the “full weight of

evidence” supporting his retaliation claim. 

1

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record in this case,

and having the benefit of oral argument, we find no merit to the issues Ridley

raises on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm. 

AFFIRMED. 

 Ridley does not allege in his initial brief that the evidence introduced at trial was

1

insufficient to support a verdict in favor of Sears on his retaliation claim. Accordingly, he has

abandoned this argument, and we decline to address it. See Davis v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

Consol., 516 F.3d 955, 972 (11th Cir. 2008). 

3
1 5 1 7 WE S T F R O N T S T R E E T S U I T E 3 5 4 TYL E R , TX 7 5 7 0 2 T E L : 9 0 3 - 5 9 3 - 8 4 7 1 FA X : 9 0 3 - 5 9 3 - 2 1 9 3 Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith , Trinity, Upshur, Van Zandt and Wood Counties www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us C HIEF J USTICE J AMES T. W ORTHEN J USTICES B RIAN H OYLE G REG N EELEY 

# T W E L F T H 

# C O U R T O F 

# A P P EA L S C LERK C ATHY S. L USK C HIEF S TAFF A TTORNEY M ARGARET H USSEY 

## June 2, 2015 Ms. Lois Rogers District Clerk, Smith County Courthouse, Suite 204 100 North Broadway Avenue Tyler, TX 75702-7201 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Case Number: 12-14-00072-CR Trial Court Case Number: 114-0302-13 Style: Sir Ortiz v. The State of Texas Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the information below and to return the attached copy to this office. Very truly yours, CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK By:_____________________________ Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk C C : Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) Sir Ortiz Mandate executed on _ 3RD __ day of ___JUNE_____________, 2015. Brief explanation of action taken: ___ SCANNED ________________________________________

____________LINDA RHYMES _________________________________District/County Clerk FILE COPY
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.5
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints George L. Lippe, Robert E. Sulentic and William P. Leiser the true and
lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998, and to sign any or all amendments to such
Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, each of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their
substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
                                       /s/ Jeffrey M. Heller
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Jeffrey M. Heller
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 
 Special Retention Bonus Program Overview 
 Bonus Pool: Aggregate bonus pool equal to
$91.112M 
 Eligibility: Executive Leadership Team, Vice-Presidents, and Executive Directors 

Performance Metrics: Operating free cash flow (OFCF) tied to the FY14 Incentive Bonus Plan (IBP) 

Payout: Ranges from 0 to 100% of base salary based on OFCF performance and payable on the same the date as the FY14 IBP payout 

Termination without Cause: Employees will forfeit right to retention bonus if the employee is not employed on the bonus payout date unless
employee is terminated by Dell without cause which results in a payout equal to 75% of maximum payout amount. 
 Bonus Opportunity:
Executive Leadership Team equal to 100% of base salary and all other executives based on increments of 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of base salary 

Change in Control: Retention bonus will be payable regardless of whether a change in control takes place or Dell remain a publicly traded company.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         This Certification is intended to accompany the Annual Report of NCO
Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), and is given solely for the purpose of satisfying the requirements of
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002. To the best of his knowledge, the undersigned, Michael J. Barrist,
Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies that:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


         /s/  Michael J. Barrist, Chief Executive Officer
              -------------------------------------------
              Date: 3/21/03