### 34389 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Notices

32 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(57). 4. Do commenters agree with ISE’s
assertion that market makers in the regular market would reduce the size of their quotations across multiple options series in the regular market because they are at risk of executing the cumulative size of their quotations without an opportunity to adjust their quotes? Please explain, and, to the extent possible, provide supporting data.

5. Do commenters agree with ISE’s
assertion that the execution of directional complex orders could result in artificially large transactions that
distort the market for other related instruments, including the underlying security or related options series? Why or why not? Please explain, and, to the extent possible, provide supporting
data.

6. According to the Exchange, the proposed rule change is designed to limit a market maker’s risk against executions of directional complex orders. Please provide data, if available, showing how the execution of such complex orders against market maker quotes in the regular market affects a market maker’s risk exposure.

7. Do commenters agree with ISE’s
assertion that the number of directional complex orders is small relative to the total number of complex orders executed on ISE on a given day? Why or why not? Please explain, and, to the extent possible, provide supporting
data.

8. Do commenters agree with ISE’s assertion that the potential risk to market makers in the regular market of allowing directional complex orders to leg into the regular market outweighs the potential benefits of continuing to allow directional complex orders to interact with the regular market? Why or why not? Please explain, and, to the extent possible, provide supporting
data.

9. Do commenters agree with ISE’s assertion that the proposed rule change would encourage market makers to provide tighter and more liquid markets on the Exchange? Why or why not? Please explain, and, to the extent possible, provide supporting data.

10. Do commenters believe that any potential benefits to investors resulting from ISE’s proposal would exceed any benefits of continuing to allow directional complex orders to interact with the regular market? Why or why not? Please explain, and, to the extent possible, provide supporting data.

Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments

• Use the Commission’s Internet comment form ( http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– ISE–2014–10 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

• Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090.

All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2014–10. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site ( http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the accommodation proposal that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the accommodation proposal between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filings also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–ISE–
2014–10 and should be submitted on or before July 7, 2014. Rebuttal comments should be submitted by July 21, 2014.

For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority. 32
Kevin M. O’Neill,
Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2014–13934 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 8011–01–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE** 

**[Public Notice: 8765]**

**Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Magna**  **Carta: Cornerstone of Liberty,’’ ‘‘Radical Words: From the Magna Carta**  **to the Constitution’’ and ‘‘Magna Carta:**
**Muse and Mentor’’ Exhibitions**

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat.

2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et

seq. ), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be included in the exhibition ‘‘Magna Carta: Cornerstone of Liberty’’ at the Museum of Fine Arts; the exhibition ‘‘Radical Words: From the Magna Carta to the Constitution’’ at the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, and exhibition ‘‘Magna Carta: Muse and Mentor’’ at the Library of Congress, imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, MA, from on or about July 2, 2014, until on or about September 1, 2014; the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, Williamstown, MA, from on or about September 6, 2014, until November 2, 2014, and the Library of Congress, Washington, DC, from November 6, 2014, until on or about January 19, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest.
I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in
the Federal Register

.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  For further information, including a list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202–632–6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505.


### 34390 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 115 / Monday, June 16, 2014 / Notices

Dated: June 9, 2014. Kelly Keiderling, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2014–14053 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4710–05–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity**  **and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q)**  **During the Week Ending May 24, 2014**

The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation’s Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et

seq. ). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.

Docket Number: DOT–OST–1996–

2008.

Date Filed: May 21, 2014. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: June 11, 2014.

Description: Application of China Southern Airlines Company Limited (‘‘China Southern ’’) requesting exemption authority and an amended foreign air carrier permit authorizing China Southern to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China and New York, NY.

Docket Number: DOT- OST–2014–

0080.

Date Filed: May 22, 2014. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: June 12, 2014.

Description: Application of Eurofly Service S.p.A. (‘‘Eurofly Service’’) requesting a foreign air carrier permit to the full extent authorized by the Air Transport Agreement between the United States and the European Community and the Member States of the European Community to enable it to engage in: (i) Charter foreign air transportation of persons and property from any point or points behind any Member State of the European Union via any point or points in any Member State and via intermediate points to any point or points in the United States and beyond; (ii) foreign charter air transportation of persons and property between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in any member of the European Common Aviation Area; (iii) charter transportation consistent with any future, additional rights that may be granted to foreign air carriers of the Member States of the European Union; (iv) other charter services pursuant to the prior approval requirements. Eurofly Service further requests exemption authority to the extent necessary to enable it to provide the services described above pending issuance of a foreign air carrier permit and such additional or other relief as the Department may deem necessary or appropriate.

Cheryl F. Collins, Docket Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2014–13984 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity**  **and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q)**  **During the Week Ending May 31, 2014**

The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation’s Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et. seq.). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2014–

0085.

Date Filed: May 27, 2014. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: June 17, 2014.

Description: Hyperion Aviation Ltd (‘‘Hyperion’’) requesting issuance of an exemption and a foreign air carrier permit authorizing Hyperion to engage in: (i) Foreign charter air transportation of persons, property and mail from any point or points behind any Member State of the European Union, via any point or points in any EU Member State and via intermediate points, to any point or points in the United States and beyond; (ii) foreign charter air transportation of persons, property and mail between any point or points in the United States and any point or points in any member of the European Common Aviation Area; (iii) foreign charter air transportation of cargo between any point or points in the United States and any other point or points; (iv) other charters pursuant to the prior approval requirements set forth in the Department’s regulations governing charters; and (v) charter transportation authorized by any additional route rights made available to European Union carriers in the future, to the extent permitted by Hyperion’s homeland license on file with the Department.

Docket Number: DOT–OST–2014–

0087.

Date Filed: May 28, 2014. Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope: June 18, 2014.

Description: Application of United Airlines, Inc. (‘‘United’’) requesting an exemption, a certificate of public convenience and necessity, and allocation of two weekly U.S.-China frequencies to permit United to provide twice-weekly scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between Guam and Shanghai, People’s Republic of China.

Cheryl F. Collins, Dockets Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2014–13985 Filed 6–13–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**

**Federal Aviation Administration**

**Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and Disapprovals** 

**AGENCY :**  Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

**ACTION :**  Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In May 2014, there were six applications approved. This notice also includes information on one application, approved in April 2014, inadvertently left off the April 2014 notice. Additionally, five approved amendments to previously approved applications are listed.