Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices 17717 

1See Letter from Petitioners, Honey from the 

People’s Republic of China: Request for Thirteenth 

Administrative Review, dated December 31, 2014. 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 80 FR 

6041, 6044 (February 4, 2015) (‘‘Initiation Notice’’). 

3The three companies are: Dongtai Peak Honey 

Industry Co., Ltd.; Kunshan Xinlong Food Co., Ltd.; 

and Lee Hoong Kee Ltd. 

4See Letter from Petitioners, Thirteenth 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order on Honey from the PRC: Petitioners’ 

Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review, 

dated March 17, 2015. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

October 28, 2023, Precision Image 

Corporation, with a last known address 

of 22424 76th Avenue Southeast, 

Woodinville, WA 98072, and when 

acting for or on its behalf, its successors, 

assigns, directors, officers, employees, 

agents, or representatives, (the ‘‘Denied 

Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly, 

participate in any way in any 

transaction involving any commodity, 

software or technology (hereinafter 

collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’) 

exported or to be exported from the 

United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, after notice and opportunity for 

comment as provided in Section 766.23 

of the Regulations, any other person, 

firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Precision Image 

Corporation by ownership, control, 

position of responsibility, affiliation, or 

other connection in the conduct of trade 

or business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with Part 756 of 

the Regulations, Precision Image 

Corporation may file an appeal of this 

Order with the Under Secretary of 

Commerce for Industry and Security. 

The appeal must be filed within 45 days 

from the date of this Order and must 

comply with the provisions of Part 756 

of the Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to the Precision Image 

Corporation. This Order shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until October 28, 2023. 

Issued this 26th day of March, 2015. 

Thomas Andrukonis, 

Acting Director, Office of Exporter Services. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07640 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–863] 

Honey From the People’s Republic of 

China: Rescission of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘the Department’’) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

the People’s Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) 

for the period December 1, 2013 through 

November 30, 2014. 

DATES: Effective April 2, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexis Polovina, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 

482–3927. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 31, 2014, based on a 

timely request for review 1 by the 

American Honey Producers Association 

and Sioux Honey Association 

(collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’), the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register a notice of initiation of an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on honey from 

the PRC covering the period December 

1, 2013 through November 30, 2014.2

The review covers three companies.3 On 

March 17, 2015, Petitioners withdrew 

their request for an administrative 

review on all the three companies listed 

in the Initiation Notice.4 No other party 

requested a review of these companies 

or any other exporters of subject 

merchandise. 

Rescission of Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Department will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if the party that requested the 

review withdraws its request within 90 

days of the publication of the notice of 

initiation of the requested review. In 

this case, Petitioners timely withdrew 

their request by the 90-day deadline, 

and no other party requested an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order. As a result, 

pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), we 

are rescinding, in its entirety, the 

administrative review of honey from the 

PRC for the period December 1, 2013 

through November 30, 2014. 

Assessment 

The Department will instruct CBP to 

assess antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries. Because the 

Department is rescinding this 

administrative review in its entirety, the 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
17718 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 63 / Thursday, April 2, 2015 / Notices 

1The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2014). The Regulations issued pursuant to the 

Export Administration Act (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401– 

2420 (2000)) (‘‘EAA’’). Since August 21, 2001, the 

EAA has been in lapse and the President, through 

Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 

2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended 

by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent 

being that of August 7, 2014 (79 FR 46959 (August 

11, 2014)), has continued the Regulations in effect 

under the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701, et seq. (2006 & Supp. 

IV 2010)). 

entries to which this administrative 

review pertained shall be assessed 

antidumping duties at rates equal to the 

cash deposit of estimated antidumping 

duties required at the time of entry, or 

withdrawal from warehouse, for 

consumption, in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). The Department 

intends to issue appropriate assessment 

instructions to CBP 15 days after the 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register, if appropriate. 

Notifications 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this review period. Failure to 

comply with this requirement could 

result in the Department’s presumption 

that reimbursement of the antidumping 

duties occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of doubled antidumping 

duties. 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: March 27, 2015. 

Christian Marsh, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping 

and Countervailing Duty Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07599 Filed 4–1–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Order Denying Export Privileges 

In the Matter of: Ivon Castaneda, Inmate 

Number—99682–004, FCI Coleman Medium 

Federal Correctional Institution, P.O. Box 

1032, Coleman, FL 33521, 

Washington, DC 20230 

On December 18, 2012, in the U.S. 

District Court, Southern District of 

Florida, Ivon Castaneda (‘‘Castaneda’’), 

was convicted of violating Section 38 of 

the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 

2778 (2012)) (‘‘AECA’’). Specifically, 

Castaneda conspired, knowingly and 

willfully attempted to export defense 

articles, that is AR–15/M–16 firearm 

barrels, receivers, components, parts, 

and accessories, from the United States 

to Honduras without having first 

obtained a license or written approval 

from the U.S. Department of State. 

Castaneda was sentenced 37 months of 

imprisonment, two years of supervised 

release and fined a $200 assessment. 

Section 766.25 of the Export 

Administration Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or 

‘‘Regulations’’) 1 provides, in pertinent 

part, that ‘‘[t]he Director of the Office of 

Exporter Services, in consultation with 

the Director of the Office of Export 

Enforcement, may deny the export 

privileges of any person who has been 

convicted of a violation of the Export 

Administration Act (‘‘EAA’’), the EAR, 

or any order, license or authorization 

issued thereunder; any regulation, 

license, or order issued under the 

International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706); 18 

U.S.C. 793, 794 or 798; section 4(b) of 

the Internal Security Act of 1950 (50 

U.S.C. 783(b)), or section 38 of the Arms 

Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778).’’ 15 

CFR 766.25(a); see also Section 11(h) of 

the EAA, 50 U.S.C. app. § 2410(h). The 

denial of export privileges under this 

provision may be for a period of up to 

10 years from the date of the conviction. 

15 CFR 766.25(d); see also 50 U.S.C. 

app. § 2410(h). In addition, Section 

750.8 of the Regulations states that the 

Bureau of Industry and Security’s Office 

of Exporter Services may revoke any 

Bureau of Industry and Security (‘‘BIS’’) 

licenses previously issued in which the 

person had an interest in at the time of 

his conviction. 

BIS has received notice of Castaneda’s 

conviction for violating the AECA, and 

has provided notice and an opportunity 

for Castaneda to make a written 

submission to BIS, as provided in 

Section 766.25 of the Regulations. BIS 

has not received a submission from 

Castaneda. 

Based upon my review and 

consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Export Enforcement, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Castaneda’s 

export privileges under the Regulations 

for a period of 10 years from the date of 

Castaneda’s conviction. I have also 

decided to revoke all licenses issued 

pursuant to the Act or Regulations in 

which Castaneda had an interest at the 

time of her conviction. 

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

December 18, 2022, Ivon Castaneda, 

with a last known address of Inmate 

Number—99682–004, FCI Coleman 

Medium, Federal Correctional 

Institution, P.O. Box 1032, Coleman, FL 

33521, and when acting for or on her 

behalf, her successors, assigns, 

employees, agents or representatives 

(the ‘‘Denied Person’’), may not, directly 

or indirectly, participate in any way in 

any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, License Exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or in any 

other activity subject to the Regulations; 

or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or in 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export or reexport to or on behalf 

of the Denied Person any item subject to 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES