alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3056 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3056

   To prohibit the implementation of new requirements to report bank 
                   account deposits and withdrawals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2021

 Mr. Scott of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Toomey, Mr. 
McConnell, Mr. Thune, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Tillis, Ms. Lummis, 
Mr. Daines, Mr. Kennedy, Mr. Moran, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Shelby, Mr. Rounds, 
Mr. Grassley, Mr. Burr, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Young, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Hyde-
 Smith, Mr. Wicker, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Risch, Mr. Braun, Mrs. Capito, 
Mr. Sasse, Mr. Cotton, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Romney, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Blunt, 
Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Cruz, Mr. Hawley, Mr. Sullivan, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Hagerty, 
  Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Graham, Mr. Johnson, Mr. 
Paul, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Lee, Ms. Collins, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr. Portman) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
            Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prohibit the implementation of new requirements to report bank 
                   account deposits and withdrawals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Prohibiting IRS Financial 
Surveillance Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON NEW REQUIREMENTS TO REPORT BANK ACCOUNT DEPOSITS 
              AND WITHDRAWALS.

    The Secretary of the Treasury (including any delegate of the 
Secretary) may not require any financial institution to report--
            (1) the inflows or outflows of any account maintained by 
        such institution; or
            (2) any balances, transactions, transfers, or similar 
        information with respect to any such account,
except to the extent that such reporting is required under any program, 
or other provision of law, as in effect on the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Commonwealth v. Patler.

*Grand jury*— Imposition *of costs*— Relief *from payment of costs*— Power *of court.*

1. Before the court can set aside the imposition of costs by the grand jury, if at all, it must be supplied with the evidence submitted to the grand jury.

2. The presumption is that the grand jury, which had full information, was justified in its action relative to costs.

Rule to show cause why prosecutor should not be relieved from payment of costs imposed by grand jury. Q. S. Dauphin Co., June Sess., 1921, No. 59.

*James G. Hatz,*for rule; *Philip S. Moyer,*District Attorney, contra.

Jan. 25, 1922.

Fox, J.,

Upon petition, a rule was granted “upon the County of Dauphin to show cause why the said petitioner, the prosecutor in the above stated case, should not be relieved from the payment of the costs as above set forth” (to wit, in the petition), to which an answer was filed by the district attorney.

We think there is no merit in the petition. The indictment charged the defendant with larceny of a key; the grand jury heard the witnesses, four in number, ignored the bill and placed the costs upon the prosecutor, Howard R. Kleinfelter. This is a power reposed in the grand jury under the Act of May 25, 1897, P. L. 89.

The power of setting aside the decision of the grand jury should not be exercised by the court without full knowledge of all of the evidence submitted to the grand jury. We are unable, without this knowledge, to pass upon the merit of the conclusion and finding of the grand jury. It heard all of the witnesses — four in number. We do not know what testimony these witnesses gave to the grand jury. It is to be presumed that the evidence submitted to and heard by it was fully and carefully considered, and that it acted correctly. We have nothing before us except the petition of the prosecutor, which sets forth alleged facts, but does not state what evidence was submitted to the grand jury, and *before*the *court can*correct an error made by the grand jury, if at all, it must be supplied with the evidence submitted to the grand jury.

If we were to make this rule absolute, it would amount to a declaration that the court, which has not heard the evidence, is better able to determine what disposition should be made of the costs than the grand jury, which did hear the evidence. The presumption is that the grand jury, which had the full information, was justified in its action.

For these reasons, we think it would be unfair and improper for the court to interfere with the finding and return of the grand jury, and we discharge the rule, at the cost of the petitioner.

From George R. Barnett, Harrisburg, Pa.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Constantine Poulios, President, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date: May 19, 2006

By:/s/ Constantine Poulios

Name:  Constantine Poulios

Title:    President (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I,
Ed Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting of LightTouch Vein
& Laser, Inc.. (“the Registrant”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge, based upon the review of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 28,  2008
            /s/ Ed
      Bailey


Ed
      Bailey


Chief
      Executive Officer


And
      Principal Accounting Officer











* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44084

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RAMON LARIOS-MENDOZA,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 808

Filed: December 7, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Minidoka County. Hon. Michael R. Crabtree, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and concurrent, unified life sentences, with a minimum period of 

confinement of twenty years, for rape and lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, 

affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Ramon Larios-Mendoza pleaded guilty to rape, Idaho Code § 18-6101(1), and lewd 

conduct with a minor under sixteen, I.C. § 18-1508. For each charge, the district court imposed a 

unified life sentence, with twenty years determinate, to run concurrently. Larios-Mendoza

appeals, contending that his sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Larios-Mendoza’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the filing of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the Report) of Moventis Capital, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006, Blake Ponuick, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |                                      
|------------------------ | -------------------------------------
|                         |                                      
|Dated: February 20, 2007 | /s/ BLAKE PONUICK                    
|                         | Blake Ponuick,                       
|                         | Chief Executive Officer and President







---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3040 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 3040

  To prohibit Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from purchasing or otherwise 
       acquiring investor property loans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2021

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from purchasing or otherwise 
       acquiring investor property loans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No GSE Subsidies for Investor 
Properties Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Conventional mortgage.--The term ``conventional 
        mortgage'' has the meaning given the term in section 302(i) of 
        the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Act (12 U.S.C. 1451(i)).
            (2) Enterprise.--The term ``enterprise'' has the meaning 
        given the term in section 1303 of the Federal Housing 
        Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 (12 
        U.S.C. 4502).
            (3) Investor property loan.--The term ``investor property 
        loan'' means a conventional mortgage secured by a property 
        comprising 1-to-4 family dwelling units that is not the 
        principal residence or a second home of the borrower.

SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON PURCHASE OR ACQUISITION OF INVESTOR PROPERTY 
              LOANS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
including the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act (12 
U.S.C. 1716 et seq.) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.), on and after the date that is 18 months after 
the date of enactment of this Act, an enterprise may not purchase or 
otherwise acquire an investor property loan.
    (b) Transition Plans.--The Federal Housing Finance Agency shall 
require each enterprise to develop and implement a plan to gradually 
reduce the purchase and acquisition of investor property loans by the 
enterprise to achieve compliance with subsection (a) while mitigating 
the risk of disruption to the housing finance market in the United 
States.
                                 <all>
```
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 23-11250 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Servando Alcala Gonzalez, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21-CR-252-3

______________________________ Before Elrod, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represen t Servando Alcala Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Alcala Gonzalez has no t filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 25, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-11250 Document: 56-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/25/2024No. 23-11250

2 concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordin gly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 23-11250 Document: 56-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/25/2024
Opinion issued December 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00751-CV

———————————

IN RE TYRONE RICHARD, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Relator, Tyrone Richard, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus, seeking a 

response to a motion that he filed. Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is 

denied.

 

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Approximately $3,698.00, cause 

number 2012-13937, pending in the 269th District Court of Harris County, Texas, 

the Honorable Dan Hinde presiding.
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and JusticFes Jennings and Bland.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form 10-Q
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                         6,542
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  67,791
<ALLOWANCES>                                   4,542
<INVENTORY>                                    32,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               110,408
<PP&E>                                         59,418
<DEPRECIATION>                                 43,721
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,705
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          65,714
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          9,923
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,610
<OTHER-SE>                                     45,810
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,705
<SALES>                                        227,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               227,359
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  82,934
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               101,248
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               345
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                11,204
<INCOME-TAX>                                   3,585
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            7,704
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   7,704
<EPS-BASIC>                                  2.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  2.03


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 65 (Monday, April 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07741]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Academic-
Community Partnership Conference Series (R13).
    Date: April 13, 2015.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Renaissance M Street Hotel, 1143 New Hampshire Avenue 
NW., Washington, DC 20037.
    Contact Person: Marita R. Hopmann, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6911, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#97fff8e7faf6f9f9fad7faf6fefbb9f9feffb9f0f8e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="791116091418171714391418101557171011571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 31, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-07741 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 21

List of Subsidiaries of Simon Property Group, L.P.

|Subsidiary                                                     |  | Jurisdiction  
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------
|The Retail Property Trust                                      |  | Massachusetts 
|Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.                          |  | Illinois      
|Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.                             |  | Texas         
|Shopping Center Associates                                     |  | New York      
|Simon Capital Limited Partnership                              |  | Delaware      
|M.S. Management Associates, Inc.                               |  | Delaware      
|Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd.                                       |  | Bermuda       
|Marigold Indemnity, Ltd.                                       |  | Delaware      
|Bridgwood Insurance Company, Ltd.                              |  | Bermuda       
|Simon Business Network, LLC                                    |  | Delaware      
|Simon Brand Ventures, LLC                                      |  | Indiana       
|Simon Global Limited                                           |  | United Kingdom
|Simon Services, Inc.                                           |  | Delaware      
|Simon Property Group Administrative Services Partnership, L.P. |  | Delaware      
|SPGGC, LLC                                                     |  | Virginia      
|Kravco Simon Investments, L.P.                                 |  | Pennsylvania  
|SPG ML Holdings, LLC                                           |  | Delaware      
|Simon Management Associates II, LLC                            |  | Delaware      
|Simon Management Associates, LLC                               |  | Delaware      
|CPG Partners, L.P.                                             |  | Delaware      

Omits
names of subsidiaries that as of December 31, 2007 were not, in the aggregate, a "significant subsidiary."

---



QuickLinks
**Exhibit 13.1****Sarbanes Oxley Act Section 906 Certification**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of The Governor and Company of the Bank ofIreland, a chartered corporation incorporated under the laws of Ireland (“Bank of Ireland”), herebycertifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that Bank of Ireland’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for theyear ended 31 March 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or §15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof Bank of Ireland.       Date: July 24, 2007          /s/ Brian J. Goggin      Name: