alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTHONY A. STRINGER, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

LINCOLN COUNTY JAIL; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-35783 

D.C. No. 6:16-cv-01428-MO 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 11, 2019**

Before: WALLACE, CANBY, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges. 

Anthony A. Stringer appeals pro se from the district court’s summary 

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging inadequate medical care while he 

was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review 

de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange, 888 F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir. 2018). We 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 18 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-35783 

may affirm on any basis supported by the record. Kohler v. Bed Bath & Beyond, 

LLC, 780 F.3d 1260, 1263 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant Tam 

because Stringer failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether

Tam’s conduct in providing medical care to Stringer was objectively unreasonable. 

See Gordon, 888 F.3d at 1124-25 (setting forth objective deliberate indifference 

standard for Fourteenth Amendment inadequate medical care claims brought by 

pretrial detainees). 

Summary judgment for defendant Lincoln County Jail was proper because 

Stringer failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether a policy or 

custom caused him to suffer constitutional injuries. See Castro v. County of Los 

Angeles, 833 F.3d 1060, 1073-76 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (discussing 

requirements to establish municipal liability under Monell v. Department of Social 

Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)).

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court. See

United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts not 

presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

Stringer’s motion to file a supplemental brief (Docket Entry No. 20) is 

granted. The Clerk shall file the supplemental brief submitted at Docket Entry 

No. 18. Stringer’s request for appointment of an expert witness in video forensics, 
3 18-35783 

set forth in his opening and supplemental briefs, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00252-CR

Kenneth Eugene Drone, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, 20TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. CR23,046, HONORABLE JOHN YOUNGBLOOD, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Kenneth Eugene Drone has filed a motion to dismissthis appeal. We grant

the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: August 30, 2012

Do Not Publish
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 97-60436

___________________________

ANNIE LEE BROWN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

KENNETH S. APFEL,

 Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

 ___________________________________________________

January 6, 1999

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Annie Lee Brown was denied widow's Social Security benefits

administratively and this denial was affirmed by the district

court. The Commissioner denied benefits based on a determination

that, under Mississippi law, Annie Lee Brown was never legally

married to Amos Brown because Amos Brown had been previously

married to Curly Mae Brown and their marriage was never terminated

by divorce, annulment, or death. 

The issue on appeal is whether the Social Security

Administration satisfied the strenuous proof Mississippi requires

to establish the invalidity of a second marriage. 

Under Mississippi law, a subsequent marriage raises a strong
2

presumption that the former marriage has been terminated by divorce

or death of the previous spouse. See, e.g., Erwin v. Hodge, 317

So. 2d 55, 57 (Miss. 1975) (presumption is “one of the strongest

known to the law”). In order to rebut this strong presumption, a

party challenging the validity of a second marriage must “show

where each party to the prior marriage had resided up to the time

of the second marriage, and then [] procure from the clerk of the

proper court in each such county a certificate of search showing

that no divorce or annulment had been granted by the court of which

he is clerk.” Pigford Bros. Construction Co. v. Evans, 83 So. 2d

622, 625 (Miss. 1955); see also Smith v. Weir, 387 So. 2d 761, 764

(Miss. 1980); Erwin, 317 So. 2d at 57.

In the administrative hearing, the Social Security

Administration did not present records from all the counties in

which Amos and Curly Mae Brown lived subsequent to their marriage

and prior to the marriage of Amos and Annie Lee Brown.

Specifically, they did not present records from Cook County,

Illinois and LeFlore County, Mississippi. Therefore, under

Mississippi law, the presumption in favor of the second marriage

was not rebutted. The district court therefore erred in affirming

the Commissioner's determination that Annie Lee Brown's marriage to

Amos Brown was a nullity. 

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is

remanded to the Commissioner with directions to recognize Appellant

Annie Lee Brown as the surviving widow of Amos Brown and to pay

benefits accordingly.
3

REVERSED and REMANDED.
# C_2016138EN.01000101.xml

| 20.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 April 2016

(2016/C 138/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1343 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78975 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1773 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0922 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2578 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,51 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3027 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4813 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2136 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4547 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4418 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7971 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6127 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5197 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 277,28 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2034 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3372 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5005 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 858,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3700 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,290 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,4242 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,587 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0408 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5947 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,4905 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1343

JPY

Japanese yen

124,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78975

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1773

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0922

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2578

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,51

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3027

RON

Romanian leu

4,4813

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2136

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4547

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4418

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7971

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6127

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5197

KRW

South Korean won

1 277,28

ZAR

South African rand

16,2034

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3372

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5005

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 858,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3700

PHP

Philippine peso

52,290

RUB

Russian rouble

74,4242

THB

Thai baht

39,587

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0408

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5947

INR

Indian rupee

75,4905

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March  31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Eleftherios Georgakopoulos, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  May 16, 2005

By: /s/

ELEFTHERIOS GEORGAKOPOULOS



Name:  Eleftherios Georgakopoulos

Title:    Chief Executive Officer
# C_2016338EN.01000201.xml

| 15.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8178 — First Reserve/Morrison Utility Services)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 338/03)

On 7 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8178. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8178. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2 – CFO 906
Certification






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In
connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Michael W. Zima,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







Date:  April14,
    2009
            /s/ Michael W. ZimaMichael
      W. ZimaChief
      Financial Officer and Principal
              Financial
      and Accounting Officer
EVIDENCE OF THE RULE'S ADOPTION 

40 CFR Part 51, Appendix V, 2.1(b) 
JILL K. SIEVEKING 

ACTING DIRECTOR 

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 

DFFICE DF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES 

STATE HOUSE 

107 NORTH MAIN STREET, ROOM 109 

CONCORD, NEW HAMPSHIRE 03301-4951 

September 20, 2011 

Received from Commissioner, Department of Environmental Services 

the following certified rule(s) filed with the Director of Legislative Services, in accordance with RSA 541-A, the 

Administrative Procedures Act, 

Docurnent # #9999 

Relative.to: Env-A 1500 - Conformity of Transportation Plans and Federal Actions . 

Number of Pages : 12 

Adopted Date : 

Filing Date: . 

Effective Date: 

Expiration Date: 

Notes: N/A 

09-19-11 

09-19-11 

10-01-11 

10/01/2019 

In all communications with-this office concerning the above rule(s), please cite the appropriate document 

number, as indicated above, 

Jill K, Sieveking, Acting Director 

Office of Legislative Services 

TDD Access: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964 

DIRECTOR (603) 271-3432 RESEARCH (603) 271-3326 

LEGAL STAFF (603) 271-3435 FAX: (603) 271-6607 ADMINISTRATIVE RULES (603) 271-3680
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                             Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
333-42743, 333-62131, 333-73807, 333-83229, 333-87493, and 333-61746 on Form S-8
and No. 333-61748 on Form S-3 of NCO Group, Inc. of our report dated February
11, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
NCO Group, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended
December 31, 2002.


                                                           /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2003
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00679-CR

RENE ZAMORA

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

331st District Court of Travis County, Texas

Trial Cause No. D-1-DC-13-904011

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 2, 2015
Attachment A

Rule Amendment that Address 110(a)(2)(J) Requirements
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                            4011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    33263
<ALLOWANCES>                                       510
<INVENTORY>                                       8756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 48081
<PP&E>                                           82502
<DEPRECIATION>                                   33068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  129058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            37062
<BONDS>                                          85000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1140)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    (1140)
<SALES>                                         211462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                211462
<CGS>                                           180998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   180998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 15644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   5798
<INCOME-TAX>                                      2105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3693
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   1153
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      2540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
David Simon, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Simon Property Group, L.P.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for
the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date: March 11, 2011/s/ DAVID SIMON David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors and
Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner


116

---



QuickLinks
Order entered August 1 5 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01540
- CV STEVEN V. TIPPS, Appellant

V. PURPLE TREE, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the County Cour t at Law No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 04540
- B



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s August 13, 2019 second motion for an extension of time to file his brief on the merits. He requests a forty

- eight hour extension of time “throu gh August 14, 2019.” As of today’s date, appellant has not tendered his brief. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion as moot. On the Court’s own motion, we ORDER appellant to file his brief on the merits by August 26, 2019 , and caution him that failure to do so may result in dismissal of this appeal for want of prosecution without further notice. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1). /s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Notice of 

GRANT AVIATION, INC. Docket DOT·OST~ 

Intent to terminate service at Twin Hills, Alaska 

Pursuant to 49 USC 41734 

90-Day Notice of Termination of Service 

Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: 

R. Bruce McGlasson 

CEO 

Grant Aviation, Inc 

P.O. Box 92200 

Anchorage, AK 99509 

907 529-6999 

bmcglasson@flygrant.com 

May 30,2015 
Notice of 

GRANT AVIATION, INC. 

Intent to terminate service at Twin Hills, Alaska 

Pursuant to 49 USC 41734 

Docket DOT-OST90 Day Notice of Termination of Service 

Pursuant to 49 USC 41734, Grant Aviation, Inc. hereby gives notice of its intent to terminate scheduled service to Twin Hills, 

Alaska, effective August 28,2015. 

In accordance with Section 41734, Grant Aviation, Inc. supplies the following information: 

1. Identification of Carrier 

Grant Aviation, Inc 

P.O. Box 92200 

Anchorage, AK 99509 

Communications with respect to this document should be directed to: 

R. Bruce McGlasson 

CEO 

Grant Aviation, Inc 

P.O. Box 92200 

Anchorage, AK 99509 

907 529-6999 

bmcglasson @flygrant. com 

2. At the time of this notice Grant Aviation provides scheduled service to Twin Hills, Alaska. 

3. Grant Aviation's service to Twin Hills consists of 6 flights weekly 

4. Grant Aviation, Inc provides the only scheduled air service to Twin Hills, Alaska, transporting passengers, cargo, 

and U.S. Mail to this isolated community. 

5. The effective date of this notice is May 30, 2015. Grant Aviation Is hereby providing public notice of its intent to 

terminate scheduled air service to Twin Hills, Alaska on August 28, 2015, providing 90 days notice as required. Any 

objections to this Notice to Terminate Service must be filed within 20 days from the date of this filing. 

?.~:«·~/) R. Bruce McGlasson /~ CEO 

Grant Aviation, Inc 

P.O. Box 92200 

Anchorage AK 99509-2200 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that I have caused a copy of the foregoing Notice of Termination to be served on May 30, 2015 to each of 

the persons named below. 

Kevin Schlemmer 

Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

kevin.schlemmer@dot.gov 

Rich Sewell 

Aviation Policy Planner 

Division of Statewide Aviation 

Alaska DOT/PF 

rich.sewell@alaska.gov 

John Sharp 

Twin Hills Village Council 

P.O. Box TWA 

Twin Hills, AK 99576 

thvc@hotmail.com 

George Pleasant, Sr. 

Twin Hills Native Corporation 

P.O. Box TWA 

Twin Hills, AK 99576-8996 

WilliamlS@huges.net
** **

**Exhibit32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANNES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Peoples First, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Susan H. Reeves, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted to Section 906 of the Sarbannes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)               the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)               the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|   | BY:                       | /s/ Susan H. Reeves |
|--------|---------------------------|---------------------|
|   | Susan H. Reeves           |
|   | Senior Vice President and |
|   | Chief Financial Officer   |
|   |                      |
|   | November 12, 2003         |

 

----
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ron Lizée, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 14, 2006

 

/s/ Ron Lizée ______________________

Ron Lizée

Chief Financial Officer 

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)