alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016034EN.01000401.xml

| 29.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 January 2016

(2016/C 34/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0903 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4626 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,76228 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3046 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1053 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4465 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,37 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4534 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5400 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2485 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5419 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5357 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4955 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6874 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5556 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 316,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7785 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1705 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6593 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 116,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5772 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,116 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 83,5018 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,067 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4753 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9966 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,3857 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0903

JPY

Japanese yen

129,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4626

GBP

Pound sterling

0,76228

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3046

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1053

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4465

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,37

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4534

RON

Romanian leu

4,5400

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2485

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5419

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5357

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4955

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6874

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5556

KRW

South Korean won

1 316,36

ZAR

South African rand

17,7785

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1705

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6593

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 116,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5772

PHP

Philippine peso

52,116

RUB

Russian rouble

83,5018

THB

Thai baht

39,067

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4753

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9966

INR

Indian rupee

74,3857

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7447

GREGORY VAN COLLINS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM D. CATOE, Director of South CarolinaDepartment of Corrections; CHARLIE CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofSouth Carolina, at Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-00-1430-2-17) Submitted: February 28, 2001 Decided: March 20, 2001 Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gregory Van Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, ChiefDeputy Attorney General, Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Gregory Van Collins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’sopinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Collins v. Catoe , No. CA-00-1430-2-17 (D.S.C. Sept. 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE O F FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME E XPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JOSEPH W. ROBINSON

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 23

- 1910

LT Case No. 2011

- CF

- 010567

- A

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. ________________________________/

Decision filed July 25, 2023

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Duval County

, London M. Kite , Judge.

Joseph W. Robinson, Carrabelle,

pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS

, LAMBERT and HARRIS , JJ., concur

.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Timothy G. Conley, as Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: March 16, 2005



/s/    TIMOTHY G.
CONLEY

Timothy G. Conley

Senior Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
EXHIBIT 99.2
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection   with  the  annual   report  of  Commodore   Separation
Technologies,  Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
2002, hereby certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes  - Oxley Act of 2002,  that to the best of his
knowledge:

         (1)  The annual report fully complies with the  requirements of section
              13 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in
              all  material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of
              operations of the Company.


Date: March 28, 2003               /s/  Andrew P. Oddi
                                 ----------------------------------
                                 Andrew P. Oddi
                                 Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MGA Insurance Company, Inc. d/b/a 

Gainsco Auto Insurance and/or Gainsco 

Auto Insurance Agency, Inc.,

 Appellant, 

v.

Samla Jift Velasquez-Ramirez,

 Appellee. 

§

 

§

§

§

§

§

'

'

'

'

No. 08-16-00192-CV

Appeal from the

353rd District Court

of Travis County, Texas 

(TC# D-1-GN-16-002546)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s first motion to abate appeal. The motion

is GRANTED. We therefore abate the appeal until February 3, 2017. The appellant’s shall file their

motion to dismiss the appeal or their motion for continuation of abatement on or before February 3,

2017.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of December, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Sally Edwards, Chief Financial Officer of DDi Corp. (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report. 

 

Date: July 31, 2008
##### 



EXHIBIT 32
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and
for the periods covered in the Report.
 /s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.

Robert B. Nolen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer andChief Financial OfficerMarch 30, 2007

(Date)
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report") of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in
                  the Report.

/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.
-------------------------------------------------
Robert B. Nolen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer

March 30, 2004
--------------
(Date)

         A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.
# C_2015112EN.01000101.xml

| 2.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7109 — Deutsche Telekom/GTS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 112/01)

On 14 April 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7109. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7109. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Order entered November 28, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00487-CR

No. 05-16-00488-CR

ANTHONY EARL LIGHTNER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 6

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-60367-X and F13-60368-X

ORDER

Before the Court are appellant’s November 10, 2016 motions to suspend TEX. R. APP. P.

9.3 and for appointment of new appellate counsel. We GRANT appellant’s motion to suspend 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.3.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file appellant’s pro se response titled “Objection to 

Appellate Counsel’s Motion to Withdraw” as of November 10, 2016.

We DENY appellant’s motion to appoint new counsel.

We further ORDER the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Anthony 

Lightner, TDCJ No. 02062031, McConnell Unit, 3001 South Emily Drive, Beeville, Texas,

78102.
/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
### ^E ;

06/15/201 1 '-Vlf ' ' L
To ; Docke t Managemen t Facilit y U.S

. Departmen t o fTransportatio n -^' ' ' 0 AIC
- 5 9 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , SE

. Wes t Buildin g Groun d Floor , Roo m W12-14 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 From : Coasta l Helicopters , LL C Lawrenc e Ihl e P O Bo x71 5 Nag s Head , N C 2795 9 Offic e Phone : 252^75-4354/Fax : 252-441-906 6 Email : obxhelicopters@gmail.co m T o who m i t ma yconcern
. O n Marc h 7 , 201 1 w e wer e issue d a n exemptio n numbe r1022 0 tha tallow s Coasta l Helicopters , LL C t o cove rit s safety-sensitiv e employee s unde ron e dru g testin g program
. Pleas e b e advise d tha t w e ar e no wpetitionin g th e FAAt o ad d OB XBiplane s t o thi s exemption

. OB XBiplanes , LLC , (LO Anumbe rOBBJ0001 ) i s a sightseein g tou rcompan ytha ti s bein g operate d an d controlle d b yLawrenc e Ihle , manage ro fCoasta l Helicopters , LLC

. W e fin d i t simple rt o includ e al l covere d employee s unde rou rcurren texemption , pleas e tak e th e appropriat e actio n an d advis e u s a s soo n a s possibl e o fyou rdecision

. I fyo u hav e an yquestions , pleas e fee l fre e t o contac tm e anytim e a t th e following : Cel l 262-928-8074

. Than k yo u verymuch

. Sincerely , LawrenceThl e Coasta l Helicopters , LL C
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
  I, Curtis Wade Fox certify that:
  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Electronic Corporate Filing Services, Inc . ;
  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
  c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
  5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
  6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
  Date: August 14, 2003
 
 /s/Curtis Wade Fox
 Curtis Wade Fox
 Sole Officer/Director
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: William J. Gonyea Junior v. Orian Scott

Appellate case number: 01-16-00292-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-51066

Trial court: 152nd District Court of Harris County

On October 4, 2016, this Court issued an order, abating the appeal and directing the trial 

court to file findings regarding whether the portion of the reporter’s record recorded by Peggy 

Hershelman was necessary to the issues appellant intended to raise on appeal. On November 3, 

2016, a supplemental clerk’s record was filed containing the trial court’s findings. The trial 

court found that the Hershelman reporter’s record was relevant but not necessary to the appeal. 

The trial court found that appellant was required to pay for preparation of the additional 

reporter’s record.

Accordingly, we lift the abatement, reinstate the appeal on the active docket and order the 

remaining portion of the reporter’s record to be filed on or before December 20, 2016 at 

appellant’s cost. Appellant’s brief shall be filed on or before January 19, 2017. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually 

Date: December 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-6645

NARAYAN SAHEFD HURT, Petitioner - Appellant,
versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-413-2) Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 21, 2004 Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Narayan Sahefd Hurt, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Andrew Witmer, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Narayan Sahefd Hurt seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on March 2, 2004. According Hurt the benefit of Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1), the notice of appeal was filed no earlier than April 2, 2004, one day late. Because Hurt failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016246EN.01000102.xml

| 7.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8079 — RPC Group/British Polythene Industries)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 246/02)

On 1 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8079. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8079. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---