alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Roomlinx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 
 2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated..
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  
 Date: April 30, 2012
 
 By: /s/ Michael S. Wasik
  Chief Executive Officer
 Chief Financial Officer
  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Roomlinx, Inc. and will be retained by Roomlinx, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
of Medical Manager Corporation on Forms S-8 (File Nos. 333-32717 and 333-73367)
and the Post Effective Amendment on Form S-4 (File No. 333-25215) of our report
dated February 5, 1999, except for the second paragraph of Note 13, the second
paragraph of Note 14 and the first paragraph of Note 14, as to which the dates
are March 2, 1999, March 15, 1999, and March 17, 1999, respectively, on our
audits of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule
of Medical Manager Corporation as of December 31, 1998 and 1997 and for the
three years ended December 31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
 
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Tampa, Florida
March 23, 1999
 
                                       65
<PAGE>   2
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of our reports dated March 7, 1997 on our audits of Systems Plus, Inc. and
Systems Plus Distribution, Inc.; dated February 28, 1997 on our audits of RTI
Business Systems, Inc.; dated March 14, 1997 on our audits of Systems
Management, Inc.; and dated February 28, 1997 on our audits of National Medical
Systems, Inc. which reports are included in Medical Manager Corporation's Form
8-K filed April 8, 1997.
 
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Tampa, Florida
March 23, 1999
 
                                        4
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 9, 2018

No. 04-18-00092-CR

Michael Lewis ARCE,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17-2118-CR-C

Honorable William Old, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The reporter’s record was due June 29, 2018. Court reporter Patricia M. Wagner has filed 

a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting an extension to July 29, 2018. Court reporter 

Lori Schmid has also filed a notification of late reporter’s record, requesting an extension to July 

29, 2018. We GRANT the requests and ORDER court reporters Wagner and Schmid to file the 

reporter’s record on or before July 29, 2018.

Court reporter Sheri Linder has not filed her portion of the reporter’s record, nor has she 

filed a notification of late reporter’s record. We, therefore, ORDER Sheri Linder to file the 

reporter’s record no later than July 23, 2018. If the reporter’s record is not received by such date, 

an order may be issued directing Sheri Linder to appear and show cause why she should not be 

held in contempt for failing to file the record. 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of July, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joseph J. Meuse, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hudsons Grill International, Inc.;



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.







/s/ Joseph J. Meuse

Joseph J. Meuse

Title:  President

Date:  November 24, 2008
Filed 12/5/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 224

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Linda Theresa Wygal, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160226

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce B. Haskell, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Brian L. Johnson, Burleigh County Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave.,  Bismarck, ND 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.

Kent M. Morrow, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant; on brief.

State v. Wygal

No. 20160226

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Linda Wygal appeals after conditionally pleading guilty to drug charges, reserving the right to appeal the denial of her motion to suppress evidence.  Wygal argues the district court erred in denying the motion to suppress, contending the officers lacked probable cause to search her bedroom.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) because officers possessed a search warrant that was not challenged. 

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers
##### 



Exhibit 10.8
 Restricted Stock Agreement
 MARINER ENERGY, INC.
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
 Employee:Date of Grant:RS Grant Number:Number of Restricted Shares Granted:
 Notice of Grant
 Vesting of Restricted Stock
  Disability
 Death
 By the Company other than for Cause




---



##### 



Termination for Cause or other than for Good Reason
 For Good Reason
 Change of Control
    th
 Book Entry
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Nontransferability of Restricted Stock
 Entire Agreement; Governing Law
 Withholding of Tax
 Amendment Company
 Status of Stock
 - 3 -




---



##### 



General
 MARINER ENERGY, INC.By:Name:Title:[NAME]Signature
 - 4 -
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6913

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ERIC MICHAEL TURNER, a/k/a Boo, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater, District Judge. (CR-97-20, CA-01-4-3) Submitted: September 6, 2001 Decided: September 14, 2001 Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Michael Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Eric M. Turner seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded sixty days if the United States is a party after entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). Thisappeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on February 21, 2001. Turner’s notice of appeal was filed on May 29, 2001. Because Appellant failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-OII-AD

Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? YES () explain NO (X) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: Is the AD significant? YES () explain NO (X) Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on asubstantial number ofsmall entities? YES () explain NO (X) Intrastate Aviation inAlaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation inAlaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES () explain NO (X)
E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule

Higgins, Cortney

to: RobertJ Wayland

03/07/2011 05:15 PM

Cc: Karen Thundiyil, Charlotte Bertrand, Bill Maxwell, Mary Johnson

2 Attachments

Mar7_2011_CERES_Handout1.pdf Mar7_2011_CERES_Handout2.pdf

Hi Bob,

Consistent with our EOs, attached are the handouts from the meeting today.

Regards,

Cortney

-----Original Appointment-----

When: Monday, March 07, 2011 1:30 PM

‐ 2:00 PM (UTC

‐ 05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: 10103 NEOB

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Angela Bonarrigo, Ceres has requested this meeting.
**EXHIBIT 99.2**

**CERTIFICATION OFPERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

The undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial conditions and results of operations of Summus, Inc.(USA).

 

| Date:      August 14, 2002 |      /s/Robert S. Lowrey                                            Robert S. Lowrey Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
NO. 12-16-00294-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

CHRISTOPHER CARREA, JR., 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Christopher Carrea, Jr. filed this original mandamus proceeding complaining of actions taken by 

the probate court. Generally, a party seeking mandamus relief must bring forward all that is necessary to 

establish his claim for mandamus relief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52. This entails filing a petition that 

includes the identity of parties and counsel, a table of contents, an index of authorities, a certification, as 

well as a statement of the case, jurisdiction, issues presented, and facts. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.5, 52.3(a)-(g), 

(j). Relator’s petition does not comply with these requirements. 

Additionally, a relator must file an appendix and record as part of his petition. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 52.3(k), 52.7. The contents of both are prescribed by the rules of appellate procedure. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a). Here, Relator provided neither an appendix nor a record. Without an appendix 

and a record, we are unable to determine that Relator is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we 

deny Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Opinion delivered November 22, 2016.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

NOVEMBER 22, 2016

NO. 12-16-00294-CV

CHRISTOPHER CARREA, JR.,

Relator

V.

HON. CHRIS DAVIS,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed by 

CHRISTOPHER CARREA, JR., who is the relator in Cause No. P12314, pending on the 

docket of the County Court of Cherokee County, Texas. Said petition for writ of mandamus 

having been filed herein on November 7, 2016, and the same having been duly considered, 

because it is the opinion of this Court that the writ should not issue, it is therefore 

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, 

and the same is, hereby denied.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Deltic Timber Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Clefton D. Vaughan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/Clefton D. Vaughan

Clefton D. Vaughan
Chief Financial Officer
March 25, 2003
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-22349 and 333-31219) of Firearms Training Systems,Inc. of our report dated May 21, 2004, except for Note 3 as to which the date is June 23, 2004, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended March 31, 2004, which appears in this Form 10-K.

 

**/s/    PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP**

 

Atlanta, Georgia 

June 28, 2004
- 51 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . MUELLER Cite as 302 Neb. 51



### S tate of 

### N ebraska 

### , appellee 

### , v



### . Z a c hary 

### A

. M ueller 

### , appella n t



### . ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed January 18, 2019. No. S-17-387.

suppleme n tal opi n io n 

### Appeal from the District Court for Morrill County: L eo 

### P

. D obrovol n y 

### , Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motion for rehearing overruled. Sarah P. Newell, of Nebraska Commission on Public Advocacy, for appellant. Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Stacy M. Foust for appellee.
H eavi c a n 

### , C.J., M iller


### ‐ L erma n 

### , C assel 

### , S ta c y 

### , F u n ke 

### , and P

apik 

### , JJ.

P er 

### C uriam



### . This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the appellant, Zachary A. Mueller, concerning our opinion in State v. Mueller

. 1 

### We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion as follows: In the statement of facts section, we withdraw the word “no” in the second sentence in the 16th paragraph and substitute the word “another” in the quotation. 2

1 State v. Mueller , 301 Neb. 778, 920 N.W.2d 424 (2018).
2 Id . at 786, 920 N.W.2d at 432. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 04/12/2019 12:07 AM CDT- 52 - N ebraska S upreme C ourt A dva nc e S heets 302 N ebraska R eports STATE v . MUELLER Cite as 302 Neb. 51 

### In the analysis section, we withdraw the fifth paragraph 3 

### under the subheading “ Venue Instruction ” and substitute the following: We note that although Mueller argued that the court should have given a venue instruction based on § 29

- 1306, he did not actually tender such an instruction, and that therefore, to the extent Mueller asserts on appeal that the court erred when it refused a requested instruction, under the applicable standards set forth above, we do not ordi

narily review whether the “tendered instruction” was a correct statement of the law or whether it was warranted by the evidence. See State v. Swindle , 300 Neb. 734, 915 N.W.2d 795 (2018). Here, we can review whether the venue instruction the court actually gave was proper under the circumstances; a consideration of whether the instruction should have included the content of § 29

- 1306 is an incidental part of that analysis. The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. F ormer opi n io n modified



### . M otio n for reheari n g overruled



### . F reude n berg 

### , J., not participating.

3 Id. at 791, 920 N.W.2d at 435.
# C_2016276EN.01002201.xml

| 29.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/22

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 July 2016

(2016/C 276/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1090 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,14 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4398 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84220 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5497 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0892 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4405 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,045 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3636 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4585 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3491 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4735 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4595 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6022 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5646 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4977 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7968 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3838 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4855 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 530,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5018 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,242 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,6747 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,676 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6306 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8716 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,3543 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1090

JPY

Japanese yen

116,14

DKK

Danish krone

7,4398

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84220

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5497

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0892

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4405

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,045

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3636

RON

Romanian leu

4,4585

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3491

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4735

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4595

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6022

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5646

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4977

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,17

ZAR

South African rand

15,7968

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3838

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4855

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 530,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5018

PHP

Philippine peso

52,242

RUB

Russian rouble

73,6747

THB

Thai baht

38,676

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6306

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8716

INR

Indian rupee

74,3543

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---