alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001022644
<NAME> ELDORADO RESORTS LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           9,005
<SECURITIES>                                     2,239
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,548
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,975
<INVENTORY>                                      3,361
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,030
<PP&E>                                         247,178
<DEPRECIATION>                                  93,239
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,226
<BONDS>                                        127,942
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      79,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,778
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,870
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  139,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,203
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,768
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,768
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cloud Medical Doctor SoftwareCorporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended September 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Pamela Thompson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, That to thebest of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

By /s/ Pamela Thompson

Pamela Thompson

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer

December 1, 2014
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06748]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-72-2014]

Approval of Subzone Status, The Coleman Company, Inc., Sauk 
Rapids, Minnesota

    On June 9, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones 
(FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Greater 
Metropolitan Area Foreign Trade Zone Commission, grantee of FTZ 119, 
requesting subzone status subject to the existing activation limit of 
FTZ 119 on behalf of The Coleman Company, Inc., in Sauk Rapids, 
Minnesota.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (79 FR 33903-33904, 6-13-2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed 
the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval.
    Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board's Executive 
Secretary (15 CFR Sec. 400.36(f)), the application to establish Subzone 
119I is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, 
including Section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 119's 2,000-acre 
activation limit.

    Dated: March 18, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06748 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
```
# C_2016201EN.01000201.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7956 — Johnson Controls/Tyco International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 201/03)

On 1 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7956. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7956. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### HELDEN *vs.*HELDEN.

APPEAL PROM CIRCUIT COURT, DANE COUNTY.

Heard February 19.]

[Decided June *4,*1860.

*Alimony*— Divorce.

The circuit court has authority in its discretion to allow to the wife and compel the husband to pay reasonable sums for her expenses in conducting -a litigation, upon a question which may arise after divorce, touching the allowance of alimony.

After the decision of the motion in this case reported 9 Wis., 557, the main appeal came on to be argued by the counsel. The facts of the appeal appear sufficiently in the opinion of the court.

*Nat. Rollins*for the appellant.

*J. C. Hopkins*for the respondent.

*By the Oourt,*

Paine, J.

This was an appeal from an order allowing the respondent $200 for her attorney and counsel fees, on the proceedings in the issue whether she had been guilty of adultery, which issue was made up on a pe*555tition of the husband, for the purpose’of reducing the alimony, after the original decree of divorce. It is objected that as the parties were already divorced, the court had no authority under the statute to make this allowance. But we think the power still remained. The proceedings taken by the husband to re-open the litigation, were taken by virtue of sec. 28, chap. 111, R. S., 1858, which authorizes the court, after ■ the original decree, on the petition of either party, to revise the whole matter of alimony, and expressly gives the power to “ make any judgment respecting any of said matters which such court might have made in the original action.” There can be no question that under sections' 15 and 16, the court in the original action, would have had power to compel the husband to pay reasonable sums for her expenses in conducting the litigation. And as section 28, notwithstanding a divorce, reserves the power for the parties still to litigate concerning the alimony, we think the intent was to reserve to court the same power to protect the wife in regard to the expenses of the litigation, which it had in the original action. Otherwise a husband might by renewing the litigation in respect to the alimony, compel the wife to exhaust her entire allowance, without any power in the court to protect her.

Section 16 left the sums to be paid -to the discretion of the court, and we think the discretion was properly exercised, in this case, whether it included the services of her counsel in this court or not, There is no doubt of the power of the court under that action, to compel the husband to furnish the wife the means to conduct the litigation in this court as well as in the court betow.

The order is affirmed with costs.
# C_2016345EN.01000101.xml

| 21.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 345/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 345/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8171 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/TREZZO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 345/01)

On 14 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8171. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8171. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03649

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03649\03649_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03649\03649_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 03649\03649_Followup Questions answered.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

03649\03649_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03649\03649_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03649\03649_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03649\03649_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03649\03649_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03649\03649_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03649\03649_telecon1.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 03649\03649_telecon2.pdf Plant submitted survey file

x 03649\03649_telecon3.pdf Plant submitted survey file

03649\Certification Statement_03649.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS BA12 BA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U1 FA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U2 FA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U3 BA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U3 FA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U4 BA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJSG U4 FA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_WTS-1 ICR SJGS.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03649\Supporting Documentation\WB1 ICR SJGS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Eric Ramirez and LA Public Insurance Adjusters, Inc. v. Dick Law

Firm, PLLC and Eric Dick

Appellate case number s : 01

- 2 1

- 00 392

- C V

Trial court case number: 201 9

- 301 83

Tr ial court: 1 13 th District Court of Harris C ounty

Appel lees, Dick Law Firm, PLLC and Eric Dick, have filed a motion for extension of

ti me to file their motion for rehearing and m otion for en banc reconsideration. The motion is

granted , and the time to file a pp ell ees ’ motion f or rehearing and motion for en banc

reconsid eration is ex tended to November 15 , 2022

.

It is s o ORDERED.

Judge’s signat ure:

___________ /s/ Ju lie Countiss

_____ ______________ Acting individually

Date: September 15 , 2 022
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 58 (Thursday, March 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06924]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Mid-Tier Bank Holding Company To Conduct a Minority Stock 
Issuance

    The bank holding company listed in this notice has applied to the 
Board for approval to conduct a minority stock issuance in accordance 
with the Board's regulations governing mutual holding companies.
    The application listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, is available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 23, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston (Prabal Chakrabarti, Senior Vice 
President) 600 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02210-2204:
    1. Provident Bancorp and Provident Bancorp, Inc., both in Amesbury, 
Massachusetts; to conduct a minority stock issuance in accordance with 
the Board's Regulation MM. Provident Bancorp and Provident Bancorp, 
Inc. control Provident Bank.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 23, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-06924 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 35,572

5 EDITH OLIVAS-VALENZUELA, 

6 Defendant,

7 and

8 HANK’S BAIL BOND,

9 Surety-Appellant.

10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF ROOSEVELT COUNTY

11 Donna J. Mowrer, District Judge 

12 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

13 Santa Fe, NM 

14 for Appellee

15 Henry W. Bayless d/b/a Hank’s Bail Bond

16 Clovis, NM 

17 Pro Se Appellant
2

1 MEMORANDUM OPINION

2 VANZI, Judge.

3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

5 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

6 {2} AFFIRMED.

7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 __________________________________

9 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

10 WE CONCUR:

11 _________________________________

12 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge

13 _________________________________

14 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
# C_2016199EN.01000701.xml

| 4.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 June 2016

(2016/C 199/06)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1154 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4382 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77285 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2605 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1050 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2853 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,025 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,44 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3861 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5188 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2902 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5397 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4594 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6683 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6287 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5351 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 322,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,3778 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3468 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4958 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 146,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6261 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,821 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,9088 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,719 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9973 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8803 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,0110 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1154

JPY

Japanese yen

121,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4382

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77285

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2605

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1050

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2853

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,025

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,44

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3861

RON

Romanian leu

4,5188

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2902

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5397

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4594

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6683

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6287

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5351

KRW

South Korean won

1 322,41

ZAR

South African rand

17,3778

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3468

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4958

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 146,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6261

PHP

Philippine peso

51,821

RUB

Russian rouble

74,9088

THB

Thai baht

39,719

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9973

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8803

INR

Indian rupee

75,0110

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
VICTOR KEITH WILSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5717

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 23, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tatiana Salvador, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and David A. Davis, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6253

ARYEE HENDERSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LASHAWN PEEPLES, Associate Warden; GREGORY WASHINGTON, Associate 

Warden; JAMES PARRISH, Associate Warden; MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden; MS. 

GASQUE, Grievance Coordinator,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. 

Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (4:19-cv-01861-BHH)

Submitted: April 14, 2023 Decided: May 10, 2023

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aryee Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian L. Craven, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY 

FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6253 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/10/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Aryee Henderson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation and granting summary judgment to Defendants on Henderson’s 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 complaint. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court correctly 

determined that Henderson failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies prior to 

filing his complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Henderson v. 

Peeples, No. 4:19-cv-01861-BHH (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2020). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-6253 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/10/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.1


 


 





 


 


February 19, 2013


 


Mr. David Cote


c/o Honeywell International Inc.


101 Columbia Road


Morristown, New Jersey 07962


 


 


Dear Dave:


 


This letter constitutes an amendment to
the February 18, 2002 letter agreement between you and Honeywell International Inc., as subsequently amended (the “Letter
Agreement”). You understand and agree that if the calculation of your retirement benefit from Honeywell International Inc.
(including the Additional Retirement Benefit described in Section 4(e) of the Letter Agreement) includes the annual incentive amount
paid to you in 2013, then solely for purposes of calculating your retirement benefit, such amount shall not exceed $4,300,000.
This letter does not modify any other provisions of the Letter Agreement, which will otherwise remain in full effect.


 


Your signature below signifies your agreement.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ Mark James


 


Mark James


Senior Vice President – Human Resources and Communications


Honeywell International Inc.


 


 


Read and Accepted


 


 


/s/ David Cote


David Cote


 


Date: February 20, 2013
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 2, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00762

- CV

Anthony Chijioke NGWU,

Appellant

v.

Vera Amuche TONI,

Appellee

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 19833

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The A ppellee ’ s Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

co urt on this 2nd day of April, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court