18144 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 64 / Friday, April 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 300 

[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1991–006; FRL–9925– 

52–Region 8] 

National Oil and Hazardous 

Substances Pollution Contingency 

Plan National Priorities List 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: On February 5, 2015, the 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

published a Notice of Intent to Delete 

and a direct final Notice of Deletion for 

the Midvale Slag from the National 

Priorities List. The EPA is withdrawing 

the Final Notice of Deletion due to 

adverse comments that were received 

during the public comment period. 

After consideration of the comments 

received, if appropriate, EPA will 

publish a Notice of Deletion in the 

Federal Register based on the parallel 

Notice of Intent to Delete and place a 

copy of the final deletion package, 

including a Responsiveness Summary, if 

prepared, in the Site repositories. 

DATES: This withdrawal of the direct 

final action published February 5, 2015 

(80 FR 6458) is effective as of April 3, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: Information Repositories: 

Comprehensive information on the Site, 

as well as the comments that we 

received during the comment period, 

are available in the docket EPA–HQ– 

SFUND–1991–0006 accessed through 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., CBI or other information whose 

disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy. Publicly 

available docket materials are available 

electronically at http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

Ruth Tyler Branch Library, 8041 South 

Wood, Midvale, UT 84047; Phone: (801– 

944–7641); Hours: M–Th: 9 a.m.–9 p.m.; 

Fri-Sat: 9:00 a.m.–5:30 p.m. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erna 

Waterman, Remedial Project Manager, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 8, Mail code: 8EPR–SR, 1595 

Wynkoop Street, Denver, CO 80202– 

1129; Phone: (303) 312–6762; Email: 

waterman.erna@epa.gov. You may 

contact Erna to request a hard copy of 

publicly available docket materials. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous 

waste, Hazardous substances, 

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Superfund, Water 

pollution control, Water supply. 

Dated: March 24, 2015. 

Shaun L. McGrath, 

Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

For the reasons set out in this 

document, 40 CFR part 300 is amended 

as follows: 

PART 300—NATIONAL OIL AND 

HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES 

POLLUTION CONTINGENCY PLAN 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 300 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 

9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 

2013 Comp., p.306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 

3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p.351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 

2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p.193. 

■ 2. Accordingly, the amendment to 

Table 1 of Appendix B to CFR part 300 

to remove the entry ‘‘UT’’ ‘‘Midvale 

Slag’’ ‘‘Midvale’’ published February 5, 

2015 (80 FR 6458) is withdrawn as of 

April 3, 2015. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07472 Filed 4–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 90 

[WP Docket No. 07–100, FCC 15–28] 

Private Land Mobile Radio Services 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal 

Communications Commission 

(Commission) grants an unopposed 

petition filed by the Public Safety 

Communications Council (PSCC) for 

partial reconsideration of the Fifth 

Report and Order in this proceeding. 

Specifically, for applicants seeking 

authority to operate centralized trunked 

stations on Public Safety Pool channels, 

we eliminate the requirement that the 

applicant demonstrate that the proposed 

station’s service contour will not be 

overlapped by any incumbent station’s 

interference contour. We also amend the 

rule changes adopted in the Fifth Report 

and Order regarding treatment of mobile 

stations to clarify how to protect 150– 

174 MHz band mobile stations that are 

associated with a base station. This 

proceeding is part of our continuing 

effort to provide clear and concise rules 

that facilitate new wireless technologies, 

devices and services, and are easy for 

the public to understand. 

DATES: Effective May 4, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rodney P. Conway, at Rodney.Conway@

FCC.gov, Wireless Telecommunications 

Bureau, (202) 418–2904, or TTY (202) 

418–7233. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

summary of the Commission’s Second 

Order on Reconsideration in WP Docket 

No. 07–100; FCC 15–28, adopted on 

March 9, 2015, and released March 11, 

2015. The full text of this document is 

available for inspection and copying 

during normal business hours in the 

FCC Reference Center, 445 12th Street 

SW., Washington, DC 20554. The full 

text may also be downloaded at: 

www.fcc.gov. Alternative formats are 

available to persons with disabilities by 

sending an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or 

by calling the Consumer & 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202– 

418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (tty). 

Summary 

1. A trunked radio system employs 

technology that can search two or more 

available channels and automatically 

assign a user an open channel. In the 

Fifth Report and Order, the Commission 

revised, clarified, and streamlined 

§ 90.187 of its rules, which specifies the 

manner in which trunking may be 

accomplished in the 150–174 MHz and 

421–512 MHz private land mobile radio 

bands. PSCC seeks reconsideration with 

respect to two of those rule changes. 

2. Section 90.187(d)(3). As noted in 

the Fifth Report and Order, § 90.187 

requires that a trunked system monitor 

the frequencies and employ equipment 

that prevents transmission on a 

frequency if a signal from another 

system is present on it, with certain 

exceptions. One of these exceptions is if 

the licensee obtains the written consent 

of all ‘‘affected licensees.’’ Whether an 

incumbent is an affected licensee 

depends on both the spectral proximity 

of the existing and proposed 

frequencies, and the physical proximity 

of the existing and proposed facilities. 

In the Fifth Report and Order, the 

Commission modified § 90.187 to 

require that the contour analysis used to 

determine physical proximity be 

performed by an applicant for a new 

centralized trunked system to 

demonstrate both that (1) the proposed 

system’s interference contour will not 

overlap any spectrally proximate 

incumbent system’s service contour; 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with RULES