alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


By signing below, the Principal Executive Officer hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report on Form 10-QSB fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hybrid Fuels Inc.



Signed this 19th day of February 2008:



By: /s/ Douglas Dickie
----------------------
Douglas Dickie
Principal Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hybrid Fuels Inc. and will be
retained by Hybrid Fuels Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 14 - 00390 - CV

MICHAEL REDLICH APPELLANT V. STONEWOOD RANCH APPELLEE

---------- FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. CV

- 2014

- 02521

---------- 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

---------- On December 10, 2014, we notified Appellant Michael Redlich of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over his attempt to appeal from a county court order sustaining a contest to his affidavit of inability to pay and denying an appeal to the county court from an adverse judgment in the justice court

. See Tex. R.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

Civ. P. 510.9(a), (c) (1)‒(3)

. Redlich fil ed a response, but it does not show grounds for continuing the appeal. “Unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal, appellat e courts generally only have jurisdiction over final judgments.” CMH Homes v. Perez , 340 S.W.3d 444, 447 (Tex. 2011). We are aware of no statute that authorizes an appeal to this court from the county court’s decision on appeal from the justice
court deny ing Redlich’s attempt to appeal without furnishing a bond or paying a cash deposit. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 510.9(c)(4) (stating only that if county court denies appeal, the appellant may post an appeal bond or make a cash deposit); McGaughy v. Lamm , No. 03

- 9 9

- 00643

- CV, 2000 WL 147649, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Austin Feb. 10, 2000, no pet.) (“We find no statute authorizing appeal to us from the county court’s decision on appeal from the justice court rejecting McGaughy’s attempt to appeal without paying costs; it is n ot among the list of appealable interlocutory orders.”); see also Torrance

- Be y v. Bank of Am., N.A. , No. 02

- 13

- 00131

- CV , 2013 WL 5517906, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Fort Worth Oct. 3, 2013, no pet.) (mem. op.) (dismissing attempted appeal from county court order sus taining contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigency seeking to proceed in trial court without prepayment of costs). Accordingly, because the order is neither a final judgment n or an appealable interlocutory order, we dismiss this appeal for want of juri sdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM3

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: January 15 , 2015
GARDEN

MORRILL

SIOUX

BOX BUTTE SHERIDAN

GRANT HOOKER

CHERRY

SCOTTS BLUFF

BANNER

KIMBALL CHEYENNE

DEUEL

ARTHUR

KEITH

PERKINS

CHASE

McPHERSON 

HAYES 

North Platte NRD

Upper Niobrara White NRD

South Platte NRD

Upper Republican NRD Middle Rep

Twin Platte NRD

Upper Loup NRD

Pu mpkinseed Creek

North

Platte

River

Lodgepole

Creek

Lake McConaughy

0 20 40 60 80 

5 10 15

R46W R45W R44W R43W R42W R50W R49W R48W R47W R53W R52W R51W R56W R55W R54W R59W R58W R57W

R39W R38W R37W R36W R35W R34W R33W R32W R41W R40W R31W 

T

1

2

N

T

1

3

N

T

1

4

N

T

1

5

N

T

1

6

N

T

1

7

N

T

1

8

N

T

1

9

N

T

2

0

N

T

2

1

N

T

2

2

N

T

2

3

N

T

2

4

N

T

2

5

N

T

2

6

N

T

2

7

N

T

2

8

N

T

1

1

N

South Platte River

This map represents the geographic area within which it has been determined that surface water is

 hydrologically connected to ground water for the purpose of designating the surface water resources 

within the Platte River Basin above the Kearney Canal Diversion, the North Platte River Basin including 

Pumpkinseed Creek and the South Platte River Basin including Lodgepole Creek as overappropriated. 

Additional information regarding the designation can be found in the Order issued by 

the Department of Natural Resources on September 15, 2004.

Hydrologically Connected Surface and Ground WaterNatural Resources District (NRD) BoundariesCounty Boundaries

Township Boundaries

Mapping Section 

Geographic Area Determined to Have Surface Water Hy

to Ground Water for the Purpose of Overappropri

Determination made by the Department of Natural Resources
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.








February
11, 2010





By:
                /s/ Pengcheng
      ChenPengcheng
      Chen, CEO
SANGUI BIOTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
                             A COLORADO CORPORATION
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sangui Biotech International,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Wolfgang Barnikol, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant
to SS 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authentication, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed from within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sangui Biotech
International, Inc., and will be retained by Sangui Biotech International, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.





Dated:  March 7, 2005                      /s/ Wolfgang Barnikol
                                            _________________________________
                                            By:   Wolfgang Barnikol
                                            Its:  Chief Executive Officer,
                                                  President and Chief Financial
                                                  Officer
# C_2016235EN.01000301.xml

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7849 — Mol Hungarian Oil and Gas/Eni Hungaria/Eni Slovenija)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/02)

On 7 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7849. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7849. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Order entered December 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00784-CV

TONYA PARKS AND PARKS REALTY FIRM, LLC, Appellants

V.

AFFILIATED BANK AND JOSHUA CAMPBELL, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-04540-C

ORDER

We GRANT, in part, and DENY, in part, appellants’ July 6, 2016 motion to extend the 

time to file a notice of appeal. We GRANT the motion as it pertains to Affiliated Bank only. 

The notice of appeal filed in the trial court on July 1, 2016 is deemed timely as it pertains to 

appellants’ appeal regarding Affiliated Bank. We DENY the motion as it pertains to Joshua 

Campbell and DISMISS Joshua Campbell as a party to this appeal because the notice of appeal 

was untimely as to him. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 27.008(b) (West 2015). We 

DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to remove Joshua Campbell as a party to this appeal.

We DENY appellees’ August 18, 2016 motion for involuntary dismissal for want of 

jurisdiction.

We GRANT appellants’ August 22, 2016 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. 

and extend the time to JANUARY 2, 2017.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2016244EN.01000301.xml

| 5.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 July 2016

(2016/C 244/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1138 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4410 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83905 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3910 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0839 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2538 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,095 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 316,93 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4304 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5133 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2284 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4792 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4328 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6418 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5452 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4989 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 278,83 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1416 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4229 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5180 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 586,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4459 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,176 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,0115 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,028 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6131 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4241 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,9065 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1138

JPY

Japanese yen

114,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4410

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83905

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3910

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0839

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2538

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,095

HUF

Hungarian forint

316,93

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4304

RON

Romanian leu

4,5133

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2284

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4792

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4328

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6418

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5452

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4989

KRW

South Korean won

1 278,83

ZAR

South African rand

16,1416

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4229

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5180

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 586,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4459

PHP

Philippine peso

52,176

RUB

Russian rouble

71,0115

THB

Thai baht

39,028

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6131

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4241

INR

Indian rupee

74,9065

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mikel H. Williams, President, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer,
principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of DDi Corp. (the Company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



/s/ MIKEL H. WILLIAMSMikel H. WilliamsPresident, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer


Date: October 28, 2009
Order entered December 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00274-CV

WIN SHIELDS PRODUCTIONS, INC. AND WINFRED L. SHIELDS, Appellants

V.

SERNERICK GREER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-13903

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ November 30, 2016 second motion for extension of 

deadline to file appellants’ reply brief. Appellants’ motion is GRANTED. Appellants’ reply 

brief shall be filed by December 30, 2016.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2015408EN.01000202.xml

| 9.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7832 — Gunvor Group/Kuwait Petroleum Europoort)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 408/04)

On 2 December 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7832. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7832. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
###### **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

#### **Section 1350Certificate of Chief Executive Officer**

                In connection with theQuarterly Report of Summus, Inc. (USA)  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theQuarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Gary E. Ban, the Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

                1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

| Date:          August 12, 2004      | /s/ Gary E. Ban                                       Gary E. Ban    Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
J-S78006-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

RANDY P. HARTZFELD 

Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

 PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1356 WDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence July 1, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Jefferson County 

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-33-CR-0000645-2014

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., OTT, and FITZGERALD, JJ.

CONCURRING/DISSENTING MEMORANDUM BY OTT, J.:FILED NOVEMBER 29, 2016

While I agree with the decision of the Majority to vacate the no-contact 

condition imposed on Hartzfeld’s sentence with respect to the victim’s 

mother,1I see no reason to vacate the no-contact provision with respect to 

the victim. For that reason, I respectfully concur and dissent.

As the Majority aptly explains, while “the trial court lacked authority to 

set the terms of [Hartzfeld’s] parole,” Section 6134(b) of the Probation and

____________________________________________



Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

1

I note, however, my reason for vacating that portion of Hartzfeld’s 

sentence differs from that of the Majority. Here, Bortz was not a victim of 

Hartzfeld’s crime, and, in fact, “fully intended to marry [him] even after a 

jury of his peers found him guilty of endangering her child’s welfare.” Trial 

Court Opinion, 3/14/2016, at 3. Although I understand the court’s concern 

that Bortz will be ill-equipped to protect her minor child, the victim herein, 

from Hartzfeld if she continues to have a relationship with him, that issue is 

one for Children and Youth Services, rather than the court.
J-S78006-16

- 2 -

Parole Act permits a trial court to make a recommendation respecting the 

terms of a defendant’s parole which should be considered as “advisory only.” 

Majority Memorandum at 5 (citations omitted). For that reason, I believe 

the “condition” imposed by the trial court, which has no real legal effect, 

should be considered simply a recommendation by the court upon 

Hartzfeld’s release. Although I recognize the panel decision of this Court in 

Mears, supra, supports the Majority’s ruling, I emphasize that Mears

involved a condition which subjected the defendant to random searches 

upon his parole. It did not, as here, seek to protect the welfare of a minor 

child who was physically abused by the defendant. In my opinion, a 

“condition” concerning the protection of a minor should constitute a 

legitimate exception to the Mears decision.

Accordingly, I would not strike from Hartzfeld’s sentencing order, the 

no-contact condition with respect to the minor victim.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6385

KHEMALL JOKHOO , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LOLA VELAQUEZ

- AGUILU, Assistant U.S. Attorney , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Louise W. Flanagan , District Judge. ( 5:19

- ct

- 03125

- FL )

Submitted : September 29, 2020 Decided: October 6, 2020

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE , and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Khemall Jokhoo , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Khemall Jokhoo appeals the district court’s order constru ing his complaint as an
action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed eral Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) , and dismissing it under 18 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, w e affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jokhoo v. Velaquez

- Aguilu , No. 5:19

- ct

- 03125

- FL (E.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*Tuesday, September 14, 1999*

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

99-1110.

#### State ex rel. Murray v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-773. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due September 7, 1999, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court *1482and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*