### 23755 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules

[Revise 9.4.3a as follows:]

Intelligent Mail package barcodes must bear a human-readable service banner with the text ‘‘ USPS TRACKING
# ’’ printed in accordance with Exhibit 708.5.1.4. Other approved extra services barcodes must bear a human-readable service banner with the text ‘‘ USPS DELIVERY CONFIRMATION ’’ prepared in accordance with 708.5.0.

* * * * * 10.0 Signature Confirmation

* * * * *

10.4 Barcodes

* * * * * 10.4.3 Printing

* * * Labels used for Signature Confirmation must meet these additional specifications: [Revise 10.4.3a as follows:]

a. Intelligent Mail package barcodes must bear a human-readable service banner with the text ‘‘ USPS SIGNATURE TRACKING # ’’ printed in accordance with Exhibit 708.5.1.4. Other approved extra services barcodes must bear a human-readable service banner with the text ‘‘ USPS SIGNATURE CONFIRMATION ’’ prepared in accordance with 708.5.0.

* * * * * 700 Special Standards

* * * * * 705 Advanced Preparation and Special Postage Payment Systems

* * * * * 7.0 Combining Package Services and Parcel Select Parcels for Destination Entry 7.1 Combining Parcels—DSCF and DDU Entry 7.1.1 Qualification [Revise the last sentence of 7.1.1 as follows:] * * * Parcels claiming destination entry pricing must bear a unique Intelligent Mail package barcode or extra services barcode, including a postal routing code, prepared under
708.5.0.
* * * * * 708 Technical Specifications

* * * * * 5.0 Standards for Package and Extra Service Barcodes 5.1 Intelligent Mail Package Barcode

* * * * * 5.1.4 Physical Barcode Requirements * * * Physical barcode requirements are as follows:

* * * * * [Revise 5.1.4d as follows:]

d. Barcode Height: unless allowed by exception, the minimum height must be at least 0.75 inch.

* * * * *

g. Human-Readable Representation of Barcode Data and Service Banner: text must be printed in accordance with Exhibit 5.1.4 and as follows:

* * * * * [Revise 5.1.4g2 as follows:]

2. Service Banners must include the human-readable text ‘‘ USPS SIGNATURE TRACKING # ’’ for mailpieces requiring a signature at delivery and ‘‘ USPS TRACKING # ’’ for all other mailpieces (service banner text shown in Exhibit 5.1.4 is an example). See Publication 91 (addendum appendix H) at http://ribbs.usps.gov for additional information.

* * * * * Exhibit 5.1.4 Barcode Specifications [Replace Exhibit 5.1.4 with a revised label illustrating the proposed generic human-readable service banner text.]

* * * * *

We will publish an appropriate amendment to 39 CFR Part 111 to reflect these changes if our proposal is adopted.

Stanley F. Mires, Chief Counsel, Legislative.
[FR Doc. 2011–10244 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 7710–12–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Parts 50 and 58**

**[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0699; FRL–9300–4]**

**RIN 2060–AP38**

**Release of Draft Risk and Exposure Assessments and Final Integrated**  **Review Plan for the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of availability.

**SUMMARY :**  On or about April 22, 2011, the EPA is making available for public review the documents titled, ‘‘ Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards: Scope and Methods Plan for Health Risk and Exposure Assessment, ’’ (REA Plan for the primary ozone NAAQS) and ‘‘ Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards: Scope and Methods Plan for Welfare Risk and Exposure Assessment’’ (REA Plan for the secondary ozone NAAQS). These documents contain the plans for the risk and exposure analyses that EPA is preparing to conduct in support of the reviews of ozone NAAQS. EPA is also making available to the public the final document ‘‘ Integrated Review Plan for the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards ’’ (IRP). This document contains the plans for the review of the air quality criteria and national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone. The Ozone NAAQS provide for the protection of public health and the environment from ozone in ambient air.

**DATES :**  Comments should be submitted by June 27, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  These documents will be available via the Internet at the following Web site: http://www.epa.gov/ ttn/naaqs/standards/ozone/

s

_ o3

_index.html. Submit your comments on the REAs, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 0699 by one of the following methods:

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

• E-mail: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov.

• Fax: 202–566–9744.

• Mail: EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0669, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail code 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please include a total of two copies.

• Hand Delivery: Environmental Protection Agency, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket’s normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 0699. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov (or e-mail). The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is

an ‘‘ anonymous access ’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you


### 23756 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules

provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http:// www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http:// www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http:// www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center is (202)
566–1742.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  REA Plan for the primary ozone standard: John Langstaff, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (Mail code C539–07), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: 919–541–1449; fax number: 919–541– 5315; e-mail address: langstaff.john@epa.gov. REA Plan for the secondary ozone standard: Travis Smith, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (Mail code C539–07), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; telephone number: 919–541–2035; fax number: 919–541–5315; e-mail address: smith.jtravis@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  I. General Information A. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, remember
to:

• Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).

• Follow directions—The agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.

• Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes.

• Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used.

• If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced.

• Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives.

• Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.

• Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. Information Specific to This Document

Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS. Section 108 (42 U.S.C. 7408) directs the Administrator to identify and list certain air pollutants and then to issue air quality criteria for those pollutants. The Administrator is to list those air pollutants that in her

‘‘judgment, cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare; ’’ ‘‘the presence of which in the ambient air results from numerous or diverse mobile or stationary sources; ’’ and ‘‘ for which * * * [the Administrator] plans to issue air quality criteria * * * ’’ Air quality criteria are intended to ‘‘ accurately reflect the latest scientific knowledge useful in indicating the kind and extent of all identifiable effects on public health or welfare which may be expected from the presence of [a] pollutant in the ambient air * * * ’’ (42 U.S.C. 7408(b)). Under section 109 (42 U.S.C. 7409), EPA establishes primary (health-based) and secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS for pollutants for which air quality criteria are issued. Section 109(d) requires periodic review and, if appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria. The revised air quality criteria reflect advances in scientific knowledge on the effects of the pollutant on public health or welfare. The EPA is also required to periodically review and revise the NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the revised criteria. Section 109(d)(2) requires that an independent scientific review committee ‘‘ shall complete a review of the criteria * * * and the national primary and secondary ambient air quality standards * * * and shall recommend to the Administrator any new * * * standards and revisions of existing criteria and standards as may be appropriate * * *. ’’ Since the early 1980s, this independent review function has been performed by the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee (CASAC).

Presently, EPA is reviewing the NAAQS for ozone. Key components of this review include a quantitative population exposure analysis and health risk assessment and a quantitative ecosystem exposure and welfare risk analysis. OAQPS has developed Risk and Assessment Plans (REA Plans) for Ozone Health Risk and Exposure and Ozone Welfare Risk and Exposure which include a discussion of the scope, approaches, and methods that staff is planning to use in conducting the exposure analysis and health and welfare risk assessment. The draft REA Plans and final IRP document announced today have been developed as part of the planning phase for the review. These documents will be available on the EPA’s Technology Transfer Network (TTN) Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ standards/ozone/s

_ o3

_index.html in the

‘‘Documents for Review Initiated in
2008 ’’ section under ‘‘Planning Documents. ’’

The REA Plans are being made available for consultation with CASAC and for public comment. Comments


### 23757 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules

should be submitted to the docket, as described above, by June 27, 2011. The CASAC consultation on these planning documents is scheduled for May 19–20, 2011. A separate Federal Register notice will provide details about this meeting and the process for participation.

Dated: April 25, 2011. Mary Henigin, Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2011–10340 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1179; FRL–9299–8]**

**Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;**  **Infrastructure SIP Requirements for 1997 8-Hour Ozone and PM**  2.5 **National Ambient Air Quality Standards** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is proposing to approve some elements and conditionally approve other elements of certifications submitted by Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin regarding the infrastructure requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 1997 eight-hour ground level ozone national ambient air quality standards (1997 ozone NAAQS) and 1997 fine particle national ambient air quality standards (1997 PM 2.5 NAAQS). The requirements are designed to ensure that the components of each State’s air quality management program are adequate to meet the State’s responsibilities under the CAA.

**DATES :**  Comments must be received on or before May 31, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2007–1179, by one of the following methods:

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.

2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (312) 692–2551.
4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.

5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney, Chief, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1179. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is

an ‘‘ anonymous access ’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http:// www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.

Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http:// www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend that you telephone Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886– 0258 before visiting the Region 5 office.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer, Attainment Planning and Maintenance Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0258, chang.andy@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Throughout this document whenever

‘‘we, ’’ ‘‘us, ’’ or ‘‘ our’’ is used, we mean EPA. This **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section is arranged as follows:
I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA? II. What is the background of these submittals? A. What State submittals does this

rulemaking address? B. Why did the States make these

submittals? III. What criteria is EPA using to judge these submittals? IV. What did EPA find from its review of these submittals? A. Section 110(a)(2)(A)—Emission Limits

and Other Control Measures B. Section 110(a)(2)(B)—Ambient Air

Quality Monitoring/Data System C. Section 110(a)(2)(C)—Program for

Enforcement of Control Measures D. Section 110(a)(2)(D)—Interstate

Transport E. Section 110(a)(2)(E)—Adequate

Resources F. Section 110(a)(2)(F)—Stationary Source

Monitoring System G. Section 110(a)(2)(G)—Emergency Power H. Section 110(a)(2)(H)—Future SIP

Revisions I. Section 110(a)(2)(I)—Nonattainment Area

Plan or Plan Revisions Under Part D J. Section 110(a)(2)(J)—Consultation With

Government Officials; Public Notifications; Prevention of Significant Deterioration; Visibility Protection K. Section 110(a)(2)(K)—Air Quality

Modeling/Data L. Section 110(a)(2)(L)—Permitting Fees M. Section 110(a)(2)(M)—Consultation/

Participation by Affected Local Entities V. What action is EPA taking? VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

When submitting comments, remember to:

1. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date, and page number).

2. Follow directions—EPA may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.