alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 60 (Monday, March 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16660-16661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07214]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Proposed Subsequent Arrangement

AGENCY: Office of Nonproliferation and Arms Control, Department of 
Energy.

ACTION: Proposed subsequent arrangement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document is being issued under the authority of the 
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. The Department is providing 
notice of a proposed subsequent arrangement under the Agreement for 
Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Nuclear Energy Between the 
Government of the United States of America and the Government of Canada 
and the Agreement for Cooperation in the Peaceful Uses of Nuclear 
Energy Between the United States of America and the European Atomic 
Energy Community.

DATES: This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than 
April 14, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Katie Strangis, Office of 
Nonproliferation and Arms Control, National Nuclear Security 
Administration, Department of Energy. Telephone: 202-586-8623 or email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#bff4decbd6da91eccbcdded1d8d6ccffd1d1ccde91dbd0da91d8d0c9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fbb09a8f929ed5a88f899a959c9288bb9595889ad59f949ed59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This subsequent arrangement concerns the 
retransfer of 221,893 kg of U.S.-origin natural uranium hexafluoride 
(UF6) (67.6% U), 150,000 kg of which is uranium, from Cameco 
Corporation (Cameco) in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, to Urenco Ltd. 
(URENCO) in Almelo, The Netherlands. The material, which is currently 
located at Cameco in Port Hope, Ontario, will be used for toll 
enrichment by URENCO at its facility in Almelo, The Netherlands. The 
material was originally obtained by Cameco from Power Resources, Inc., 
Cameco Resources-Crowe Butte Operation, and White Mesa Mill pursuant to 
export license XSOU8798.
    In accordance with section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, 
as amended, it has been determined that

[[Page 16661]]

this subsequent arrangement concerning the retransfer of nuclear 
material of United States origin will not be inimical to the common 
defense and security of the United States of America.

    Dated: March 11, 2015.

    For the Department of Energy.
Anne M. Harrington,
Deputy Administrator, Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation.
[FR Doc. 2015-07214 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2010

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JAMES A. HUNT,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (5:11-cv-00035-D)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order denying his motion for reconsideration in a closed 

42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Davis v. Hunt, No. 5:11-

cv-00035-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2016). We deny Davis’ motions to 

remand and to appoint a guardian ad litem. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2978 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2978

     To require the Secretary of the Treasury to consider certain 
  transactions related to precious metals for purposes of identifying 
   jurisdictions of primary money laundering concern, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2021

   Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Tillis, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Secretary of the Treasury to consider certain 
  transactions related to precious metals for purposes of identifying 
   jurisdictions of primary money laundering concern, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING PRECIOUS 
              METALS FOR PURPOSES OF IDENTIFYING JURISDICTIONS OF 
              PRIMARY MONEY LAUNDERING CONCERN.

    Section 5318A(c)(2) of title 31, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by redesignating clauses (iii) through (vii) as 
                clauses (iv) through (viii), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after clause (ii) the following:
                            ``(iii) the extent to which the 
                        jurisdiction or financial institutions 
                        operating in that jurisdiction facilitate 
                        transactions that are related to precious 
                        metals and are subject to being blocked 
                        pursuant to sanctions imposed by the United 
                        States under any statute or Executive order;''; 
                        and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by redesignating clauses (ii) and (iii) as 
                clauses (iii) and (iv), respectively; and
                    (B) by inserting after clause (i) the following:
                            ``(iv) the extent to which such financial 
                        institutions, transactions, or types of 
                        accounts are used to facilitate transactions 
                        that are related to precious metals and are 
                        subject to being blocked pursuant to sanctions 
                        imposed by the United States under any statute 
                        or Executive order;''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

Iraq

Kuwait

Lebanon

Libya

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

Syria

United Arab Emirates

Yemen

Danielle Rolfes,

International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 2015-07309 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-25-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17080-17081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07467]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings; National Science Board

    The National Science Board's Committee on Programs and Plans (CPP) 
and Subcommittee on Facilities (SCF), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 
CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 
U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 
552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for 
the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, April 3, 2015 at 1 p.m. EDT.

SUBJECT MATTER: Chairmen's remarks and discussion of NSF's draft 
response

[[Page 17081]]

to the Decadal Survey of Ocean Sciences (DSOS) report.

STATUS:  Closed.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference. Please refer to the 
National Science Board Web site www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional 
information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status 
of meeting) which may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. 
Point of contact for this meeting is John Veysey at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f25392a363c2a360f213c2961282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85eff3e0fcf6e0fcc5ebf6e3abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>.

Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-07467 Filed 3-27-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of K.M.F. and B.E.F. v. Department of Family and 

Protective Services

Appellate case number: 01-16-00868-CV

Trial court case number: 2015-04873J

Trial court: 314th District Court of Harris County

Appellant has filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to file her brief. We grant 

the motion and extend the time to file appellant’s brief until December 19, 2016. No further 

extensions will be granted.

Appellee’s brief is due on January 13, 2017. No extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Michael Massengale

 Acting individually 

Date: December 1, 2016
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Wyomissing Area School District, :

Appellant :

:

v. :

:

Zoning Hearing Board of Wyomissing :

Borough, and Wyomissing Borough :

:

Wyomissing Area School District :

:

v. :

:

Wyomissing Borough, and Michelle :

Bare, in her official capacity as the :

Building and Zoning Official of :

Wyomissing Borough : No. 447 C.D. 2015

O R D E R

NOW, December 29, 2015, having considered appellees’ application 

for reargument en banc and appellant’s response in opposition thereto, the 

application is denied.

_____________________________

DAN PELLEGRINI, 

President Judge
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**Certificate
      of Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      1350)**





The
      undersigned, Michael A. Grollman, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief
      Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of National Scientific
      Corporation (the “Company”), has executed this certification in connection with
      the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Company’s Annual
      Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 (the
“Report”). The undersigned hereby certifies that:





1. The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial results of operations of the Company.





IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certificate as of the
      December 29, 2007.








/s/
                Michael A. GrollmanMichael
                A. Grollman
              Chairman,
                Chief Executive Officer,
              and
                Acting Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

THEODORE MADISON TOWNER , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 21

- 3548

[ July 14, 2022 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; Lawrence Michael Mirman , Judge; L.T. Case No. 56

- 2010

- CF

- 002781A

.
Theodore Madison Towner, Crestview, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

G ROSS , D AMOORGIAN and C ONNER , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 13.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of API Electronics Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Jason DeZwirek, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S)
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/  Jason DeZwirek
-------------------------------
Jason DeZwirek
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
November 25, 2003
Exhibit 32.2

              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In   connection   with   the   quarterly   report   (the   "Report")   of  China
Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof, I, HUANG Chentai, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



Date: August 14, 2005                                 By: /s/ HUANG Chentai
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         HUANG Chentai
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2890 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2890

  To allow participants in the National Health Service Corps to defer 
their obligated service in order to receive training in palliative care 
                               services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2021

 Ms. Rosen (for herself, Ms. Murkowski, and Ms. Smith) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow participants in the National Health Service Corps to defer 
their obligated service in order to receive training in palliative care 
                               services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Provider Training in Palliative Care 
Act''.

SEC. 2. DEFERRAL OF OBLIGATED SERVICES FOR TRAINING IN PALLIATIVE CARE.

    Section 331 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254d) is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (j) as subsection (k); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (i) the following:
    ``(j) In carrying out subpart III, the Secretary may issue 
deferrals of the period of obligated service to individuals who have 
entered into a contract for obligated service under the Scholarship 
Program or the Loan Repayment Program and who apply for such a deferral 
in order to receive training in palliative care. The Secretary may 
grant such a deferral to such an individual for a period of up to 1 
year.''.
                                 <all>
```
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 24-10406

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

James L. Rudzavice, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:07-CR-138-1

______________________________

Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

James L. Rudzavice, federal prisoner # 36844-177, appeals the denial 

of his motion for compassionate release, filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). He argues that the district court failed to explain why his 

sentence is longer than the sentences imposed on similar defendants with 

more aggravating factors. He further faults the district court for “brush[ing]

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

September 17, 2024

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 24-10406 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/17/2024
No. 24-10406

2

aside” the facts he presented as “untruthful” and for failing to address every 

claim raised in his motion, and he maintains that his “unusually long” 

sentence and his postconviction conduct constitute extraordinary and 

compelling reasons for a sentence reduction. Additionally, Rudzavice

contends that the district court abused its discretion by refusing to lower his 

sentence when (i) he would face a lower sentence under “the new 

amendments” if he were sentenced today; (ii) he “has not received a shot in 

over ten years”; (iii) the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) “has confidence in [him] 

to have him monitor: suicide watch”; and (iv) the BOP labels him as “low 

recidivism.”

We review the denial for abuse of discretion. See United States v. 

Chambliss, 948 F.3d 691, 693-94 (5th Cir. 2020). Here, the district court 

conducted an independent review of the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors and 

determined that Rudzavice was not entitled to relief. Rudzavice’s 

disagreement with the balancing of those factors is insufficient to show an 

abuse of discretion. See id. at 694. Moreover, the district court’s analysis 

was thorough and “relied upon the record, while making clear that [the 

court] considered [Rudzavice’s] arguments and [took] account of the 

§ 3553(a) factors.” Chavez-Meza v. United States, 585 U.S. 109, 116 (2018). 

Accordingly, the reasons provided are sufficient. See id.

Because the district court’s independent consideration of the 

§ 3553(a) factors provides a sufficient basis for affirmance, we need not 

consider whether the district court erred in determining that Rudzavice failed 

to show extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting relief. See United 

States v. Jackson, 27 F.4th 1088, 1093 n.8 (5th Cir. 2022). The order of the 

district court is AFFIRMED. All outstanding motions are DENIED.

Case: 24-10406 Document: 44-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/17/2024
Opinion issued December 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00685-CV

———————————

DAVID SOLIZ, LETICIA SOLIZ AND SOLIZ AUTOMOTIVE, INC. D/B/A 

1ST COLLISION SPECIALIST, INC., Appellants

V.

LESLIE WM. ADAMS, ATTORNEY AT LAW, PLLC D/B/A LESLIE WM. 

ADAMS & ASSOCIATES, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Civil Court at Law No. 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 1032263

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants, David Soliz, Leticia Soliz, and Soliz Automotive, Inc. d/b/a 1st 

Collision Specialist, Inc., have neither paid the required fees nor established 

indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (requiring payment 
2

of fees in civil cases unless indigent), 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing 

indigence); see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a) (West 2013), § 

101.041 (West Supp. 2016) (listing fees in court of appeals); Order Regarding Fees 

Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before 

the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158 (Tex. Aug. 

28, 2015) (listing fees in court of appeals). After being notified that this appeal was 

subject to dismissal, appellants did not adequately respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 

(allowing enforcement of rule); 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case).

We dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees.

We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CHARLES VOLK,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 299 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.