alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                   |   |                      |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                                                   |   |                      |
| Name of Entity                                         |   | Jurisdiction of Formation |
| Emit Technology Co., Ltd                               |   | Taiwan                    |
| OCP Asia Investment, Inc.                              |   | Taiwan                    |
| OCP Asia, Inc.                                         |   | Taiwan                    |
| Oplink Communications Limited                     |   | Hong Kong                 |
| Oplink Communications (HK) Limited                |   | Hong Kong                 |
| Oplink HK I Limited                                    |   | Hong Kong                 |
| Oplink HK II Limited                                   |   | Hong Kong                 |
| Oplink International Ltd.                              |   | Cayman Islands            |
| Oplink Macau Commercial Services Company Limited       |   | Macau, China              |
| Oplink Technology, Inc.                                |   | Cayman Islands            |
| Optical Communication Products, Inc.                   |   | Delaware                  |
| Shanghai Oplink Communications, Inc.                   |   | Shanghai, China           |
| Taiwan Oplink Communications, Inc.                     |   | Taiwan                    |
| Wuhan Oplink Smart-Command-Network Technology Co., Ltd |   | Wuhan, China              |
| Zhuhai FTZ Oplink Communications, Inc.                 |   | Zhuhai, China             |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6414

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES ROBERT COBLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Graham C. Mullen, Senior 

District Judge. (5:12-cr-00026-GCM-1; 5:15-cv-80856-GCM)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: December 1, 2016

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Robert Cobler, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Spodick Healey, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Robert Cobler seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, in which he 

claimed counsel was ineffective, and but for counsel’s deficient 

performance, he would not have pled guilty. The order is not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate 

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Cobler has not established that his counsel was ineffective. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2016121EN.01000201.xml

| 6.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 April 2016

(2016/C 121/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1367 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4421 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80160 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2560 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0892 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4995 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,036 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,62 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2448 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4660 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2165 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5085 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4968 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8164 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6780 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5430 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 317,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0187 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3595 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5110 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 035,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4635 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,593 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 78,4507 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,103 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1395 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9963 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,5435 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1367

JPY

Japanese yen

125,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4421

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80160

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2560

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0892

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4995

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,036

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,62

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2448

RON

Romanian leu

4,4660

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2165

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5085

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4968

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8164

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6780

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5430

KRW

South Korean won

1 317,17

ZAR

South African rand

17,0187

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3595

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5110

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 035,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4635

PHP

Philippine peso

52,593

RUB

Russian rouble

78,4507

THB

Thai baht

40,103

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1395

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9963

INR

Indian rupee

75,5435

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
****
```
Exhibit 3.3
```

```
                             ARTICLES OF CORRECTION
                                       OF
                         HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC.

Pursuant to Section 607.0124 of the Florida Business Corporation Act of the
State of Florida, the undersigned corporation hereby submits these Articles of
Correction for the purpose of correcting a document filed with the Secretary of
State:

1.       The name of the corporation is High Speed Net Solutions, Inc.

2.       On the 3rd day of March, 2000, the corporation filed with the
         Secretary of State Articles of Amendment dated February 24, 2000,
         which Articles of Amendment designated a new series of preferred stock
         referred to therein as Series A Convertible Preferred Stock.

3.       The Statement of Rights and Preferences of the 8% Series A Convertible
         Preferred Stock attached to the foregoing Articles of Amendment were
         incorrect with respect to Paragraph 1, "Number and Designation," in
         that The Statement of Rights and Preferences contained a typographical
         error and incorrectly stated that the Series A Convertible Preferred
         Stock has "no par value," instead of "$.001 par value," which was the
         intent of the corporation.

         This the 22nd day of June, 2000.

                                             HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC.

                                             By: /s/ Andrew Fox
                                             --------------------------------
                                                 Andrew Fox, Acting President
```

****
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Top Image Systems Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ido Schechter, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)    
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: March 31, 2005

| |  | /s/ Ido Schechter 
Name: Ido SchechterTitle: Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Exhibit 32.1

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2009 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2009.



/s/ Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of DirectorsAugust 7, 2009




-45-
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 276 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to include a prohibition 

on the listing of a living nonnative species as a threatened species 

or an endangered species, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2021 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to include 

a prohibition on the listing of a living nonnative species 

as a threatened species or an endangered species, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Saving America’s Vul5 nerable and Endangered Species Act’’ or the ‘‘SAVES 

6 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 276 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LISTING OF LIVING NONNATIVE 

2 SPECIES AS THREATENED SPECIES OR EN3 DANGERED SPECIES. 

4 (a) LIMITATION.—The Endangered Species Act of 

5 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is amended by adding at 

6 the end the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 19. PROHIBITION ON LISTING OF LIVING NONNATIVE 

8 SPECIES AS THREATENED SPECIES OR EN9 DANGERED SPECIES. 

10 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Sec11 retary shall not list under section 4(c) any living nonnative 

12 species.’’. 

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of con14 tents for the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 

15 prec. 1531) is amended by inserting after the item relating 

16 to section 17 the following: 

‘‘Sec. 18. Annual cost analysis by the Fish and Wildlife Service. 

‘‘Sec. 19. Prohibition on listing of living nonnative species as threatened species 

or endangered species.’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Filed 12/5/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 220

Mike Allen Delvo, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160102

Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Todd N. Ewell, Bismarck-Mandan Public Defender Office, 410 East Thayer Avenue, Suite 201, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Julie A. Lawyer, Burleigh County Assistant State’s Attorney, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, ND 58501, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Delvo v. State

No. 20160102

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Mike Delvo appeals from a district court order denying post-conviction relief.  In 2011, while on probation for an earlier criminal conviction, Delvo was charged with several drug related offenses.  Delvo remained incarcerated for 99 days before his release on bond.  Thereafter, Delvo’s probation was revoked based upon the new charges.  Delvo served 408 days on the probation revocation before pleading guilty to the new charges.  The district court sentenced Delvo to incarceration for twenty years on counts one and two and five years on count three with five years suspended and five years of probation following release.  In addition, the district court ordered Delvo receive 99 days credit for time served on the new charges from the time of his arrest until his release on bond.  The district court ordered the sentences run concurrently with the sentence imposed in the earlier conviction for which his probation was revoked.  Delvo applied for post-conviction relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel and failure to receive credit for the 408 days served on the revocation of probation.  After a hearing, the district court denied Delvo post- conviction relief.

[¶2]On appeal, Delvo argues the district court erred by denying post-conviction relief and denying credit for 408 days served.  Delvo has not met his burden to show he is entitled to credit for additional time.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2) and (7).  Gust v. State, 2006 ND 114, ¶¶ 7-9, 714 N.W.2d 826.

[¶3]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

LARRY ROJAS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-3051

DYCK-O'NEAL, INC.,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 9, 2016

Non-Final Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Orange County,

John E. Jordan, Judge.

N. James Turner, Orlando, for Appellant.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Aluia v. Dyke-O’Neal, Inc., 41 Fla. L. Weekly D1660 (Fla. 2d DCA 

July 15, 2016) (holding that debtor’s motion to dismiss was correctly denied because 

debtor failed to plead and prove that creditor was “debt collector” as defined by the Fair 

Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§1692-1692p).

ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.
# C_2016146EN.01000501.xml

| 26.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 146/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Finland

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 100th anniversary of the birth of philosopher Georg Henrik von Wright

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : At the inner part of the coin is an ancient Doric pillar, and an oak branch at the left. The inscription ‘GEORG HENRIK VON WRIGHT’ is placed in semi-circle from left to right and the year of issuance ‘2016’ is placed on the top at the right. On the top at the left is the indication of the issuing country ‘FI’ and the mint mark.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : October 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Exhibit 32.1

 (a) Certification of Annual Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       --------------------
                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       March 30, 2007



<PAGE>


(b) Certification of Annual Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ William Swain
                                       -----------------
                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       March 30, 2007
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2850 

To exempt individuals from complying with a Federal COVID–19 vaccine 

mandate on the basis of a personal belief, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. LEE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To exempt individuals from complying with a Federal 

COVID–19 vaccine mandate on the basis of a personal 

belief, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Biden Can’t Force Me 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PERSONAL BELIEF EXEMPTION FROM COVID–19 

7 VACCINE MANDATES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Any COVID–19 vaccine mandate 

9 issued by an Act of Congress or by an executive agency 

10 shall include an exemption for any individual who has a 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2850 IS

1 sincerely held belief that inclines the individual to refuse 

2 the receipt of a COVID–19 vaccine. 

3 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

4 (1) COVID–19 VACCINE MANDATE.—The term 

5 ‘‘COVID–19 vaccine mandate’’ means any require6 ment that an individual receive a COVID–19 vac7 cine, including any requirement that an employer re8 quire an employee or independent contractor to re9 ceive such a vaccine. 

10 (2) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term ‘‘executive 

11 agency’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

12 105 of title 5, United States Code. 

13 (c) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this sec14 tion shall be construed to allow for or otherwise authorize 

15 a COVID–19 vaccine mandate issued by an Act of Con16 gress or by an executive agency. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# CA2014304EN.01000301.xml

| 9.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 304/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 304/3

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 304 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 293 | (NL) |
| 295 | (MT) |
| 297 | |
| 299 | |
| 304 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

293

(NL)

295

(MT)

297

299

304

---