alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 17, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00149- CV

LESLIE ANN SHERRILL, Appellant

V. HOWARD S. LAW II, Appellee

On Appeal from the 247th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-58434

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N This is an appeal from a judgment signed February 1, 2018 . The notice of appeal was filed February 26, 2018 . To date, our records show appellan t has not paid the appellate filing fee , and n o evidence that appellant is excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed.

. See Tex. R. App. P. 5; Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 51.207. On March 27, 2018 , this court o rdered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee by April 6, 2018, or the appeal would be
dismissed. The filing fee has not been paid.2

Further, no clerk’s record has been filed. The clerk responsible for preparing the record in this appeal informed the court appellant did not make arrangements to pay for the record. On April 17, 2018 , the court notified all parties of the court’s intention to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within fifteen days, appellant paid or made arrangements to pay for the record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). No such proof has been filed.
Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant failed to comply with
order or notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher , and Busby

.
Phone: 701.663.6501 or 800.234.0518 

 3201 Nygren Drive NW • P.O. Box 727 • Mandan, ND 58554-0727 Fax: 701.663.3745 www.ndarec.com

 

November 5, 2010 

The Honorable Lisa Jackson 

Administrator 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Ariel Rios Building (Mail Code 1101) 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, D.C. 20460 

Re: Petition for Reconsideration of Portions of the Final Rule: National Emission Standards for 

Hazardous Air Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines 

Dear Administrator Jackson: 

On behalf of the North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives (NDAREC), I am writing in 

support of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association’s (NRECA) Petition for Reconsideration, 

dated October 19, 2010, relating to portions of the Final National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air 

Pollutants for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines promulgated on August 20, 2010, 

(75 Fed. Reg. 51,570). 

NDAREC is the state trade association for 16 electric distribution cooperatives and five generation and 

transmission cooperatives operating in North Dakota. Together, our distribution cooperatives account for 

50% of the state’s retail electric sales, and our generation and transmission cooperatives generate and 

transmit much of the electric power used throughout the Upper Midwest and Mountain West from coal 

generation plants and wind farms located in North Dakota. 

North Dakota’s electric cooperatives serve some of the most rural and least populated counties in the 

United States. The co-op serving the most densely populated rural territory in North Dakota still serves 

less than eight consumers per mile of line, and most of our cooperatives serve less than one customer per 

mile of line. Our service territories have clean air and we support keeping it that way. But, our 

cooperatives also serve in a state that has had more than its share of weather-related disasters, including 

blizzards, ice storms, tornadoes, and floods. Earlier this year, one of our small cooperatives (about 5,000 

members) experienced two major ice storms resulting in $35 million in damages and causing power 

outages that lasted in some cases up to four weeks. I bring this up to underscore the challenges our 

distribution cooperative members face in delivering electric power reliably and affordably to their 

consumers. That’s why NDAREC works to find solutions to problems that impose least cost alternatives 

for our members. 

NDAREC relies on NRECA to provide guidance on complex regulatory issues that may be of concern to 

our membership. NRECA has an excellent staff that works primarily with environmental professionals 

from the generation and transmission cooperatives on environmental regulations, such as hazardous air 

pollution rules.
Vertex Energy, Inc. 8-K


Exhibit 10.1


 


FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY
NOTE


 


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE (the “First Amendment”) is
made and entered into effective as of this 11th day of October, 2021, by and between Vertex Energy Operating, LLC, a Texas
limited liability company (“Vertex”), and HPRM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“HPRM”).


 


W I T N E S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, HPRM and Vertex entered into
that certain Promissory Note dated July 1, 2021, reference to which is hereby made for all purposes (the “Note”);
and


 


WHEREAS, Vertex and HPRM desire
to amend the Note to extend the maturity date as provided for herein.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of
the mutual promises herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, it is agreed as follows:


 


1.     
Amendment of Section 2. Section 2 of the Note is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:


 


Due Date. The principal amount of this
Note together with accrued interest (the sum of such principal and accrued interest being hereinafter referred to as the “Amount
Due”) shall be due on or before the earlier of (the “Due Date”): (i) February 28, 2022; and (ii) five (5) calendar
days following the closing of the transaction between Vertex Energy Operating LLC, and/or any of its affiliates, and Safety-Kleen Systems,
Inc. and/or any of its affiliates, as more particularly described in the Asset Purchase Agreement between them dated June 29th,
2021. This Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time without premium or penalty and without the consent of the Lender.


 


2.     
Continuation of Note. Except as amended hereby, the Note shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.     
Execution in Counterparts. This First Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and by different parties hereto
in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which taken together
shall constitute but one and the same instrument. Signatures delivered by facsimile or via e-mail in portable document format (“pdf”)
shall be binding for all purposes hereof. Section headings are intended for convenience of reference only and shall not affect in any
way the meaning or interpretation of this instrument.


 


[Signature pages follow.]


 




 


 


1




      


     


    

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have execute this First
Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


 


VERTEX:


 


VERTEX ENERGY OPERATING LLC


 


 


 


By:





Print Name: Benjamin Cowart


Title: President & CEO




      


     


    

 


HPRM:


 


HPRM LLC


Tensile-Heartland
Acquisition Corporation


Its: Managing Member


 


 


 By:





Douglas J. Dossey




Its:   


Authorized Representative
EXHIBIT
      32.1





SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION




The
      certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
      Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) for the
      purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
      Title 18 of the United States Code.




Jiri
      Nor,
      the Chief Executive Officer and Anthony Durkacz, the Vice President, Finance
      of
      Astris Energi Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




1.
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Exchange Act; and





2. the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of Astris Energi
      Inc.





By:
            /s/
              Jiri
              K. NorPresident and Chief Executive Officer
              Date: May 18,
                2006


By:
              /s/
                Anthony DurkaczVice President, Finance
                Date: May 18,
                  2006
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Ron Lizée, the Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)          
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)         
 the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2007

/s/ Ron
Lizée
Ron Lizée Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

---
#### Holmes vs. Braman and others.

October 11.

An appeal from a judgment in an action for partition, was dismissed because no printed “ case;” nor any brief on either side, had been filed.

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for *Jefferson*County.

*G-. T. Thorn,*for appellant.

*J. IS. Holmes, in pro. per.*

*By the Court,*

Cole, J.

This suit was instituted for tbe partition of certain real estate among tenants 'in common. From tbe judgment of partition this appeal is taken. We have not been furnished with any printed cases, nor with briefs and arguments on either side, and we are ignorant of what objections are taken to the judgment. We cannot take upon ourselves the labor of carefully examining such records to see if there is any error in the proceedings. In foreclosure cases which are submitted to us upon the record, we do this, but we are unwilling to do it in partition cases. And as an affirmance of the judgment might perhaps affect injuriously the rights of the parties, we deem it more advisable to dismiss the appeal, under the rule, for want of proper printed cases.

Tbe appeal is dismissed.
Summary PBT Profiler Results_TOFA TETA Sanitized
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         $10,161
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,225<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     23,192
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                81,578
<PP&E>                                         302,849<F2>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 528,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,956
<BONDS>                                        214,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              280
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,748
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   528,583
<SALES>                                        118,440
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               326,588
<CGS>                                           93,621
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  218,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,538
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   768
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              35,997
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,967
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,023
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              6,944
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  4,917
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,027
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
<FN>
<F1>Net of Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
<F2>Includes Equipment for rent and is net of Accumulated Depreciation
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# CA2015265EN.01000101.xml

| 13.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 265/1

---

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION

(2015/C 265 A/01)

The selection procedure CONS/AD/113:

| — | Director, Legal Service, Directorate 3 (External Relations) |
| --- | --- |

—

Director, Legal Service, Directorate 3 (External Relations)

for which the notice was published in the Official Journal of the European Union
   (1) is cancelled.

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

(1)  OJ C 119 A, 14.4.2015, p. 18.

1

---
# C_2016207EN.01000101.xml

| 10.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7904 — Bekaert/OTPP/Bridon Bekaert Ropes JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 207/01)

On 22 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7904. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7904. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15617-15618]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06651]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    The meeting announced below concerns Economic Studies of 
Immunization Policies and Practices, Funding Opportunity Announcement 
(FOA) IP15-001 and US Platform to Measure Influenza Vaccine

[[Page 15618]]

Effectiveness against Laboratory-Confirmed Influenza-Associated 
Hospitalizations, FOA IP15-002, initial review.
    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:
    Time And Date: 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m., April 15, 2015 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., and 
the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters For Discussion: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response 
to ``Economic Studies of Immunization Policies and Practices'', FOA 
IP15-001 and ``US Platform to Measure Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness 
against Laboratory-confirmed Influenza-associated Hospitalizations'', 
FOA IP15-002.
    Contact Person For More Information: Gregory Anderson, M.S., 
M.P.H., Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road NE., Mailstop 
E60, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 718-8833.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-06651 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
San Joaquin Valley 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

October 8,2007 

IWr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager 

Rule Evaluations Section 

California Air Resources Board 

P.O. Box 281 5 

Sacramento, CA 9581 2 

Dear Mr. Guzzetta: 

Attached is the Rule Action Package for Rule 4682 (Polystyrene Foam, Polyethylene, 

and Polypropylene Manufacturing), which was adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air 

Pollution Control District Governing Board on September 20, 2007;. We request that the 

California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit Rule 4682 and the appropriate 

documentation to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. 

Included with this Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 

1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 

2. ARB APCDIAQMD Rule Evaluation Form 

3. Clean Copy of Rule 4682 

4. StrikeoutIUnderline Copy of Rule 4682 

5. Governing Board Resolution 

6. Evidence of Public Hearing 

7. Governing Board Memo 

8. Staff Report with appendices. 

-The Rule Action Package is being transmitted by e-mail to ARB staff. If you have any 

questions, please contact Manuel Salinas at (559) 230-5833 or by e-mail at 

manuel.salinas@valleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for your 

assistance. 

Si cerely, 

LJbt hi.& 

Scott Nester 

Director of Planning 

Attachments 

Printed on recycled paper. 0
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17076]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07335]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JOINT BOARD FOR THE ENROLLMENT OF ACTUARIES


Meeting of the Advisory Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Executive Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment 
of Actuaries gives notice of a closed meeting of the Advisory Committee 
on Actuarial Examinations.

DATES: The meeting will be held on April 27, 2015, from 8:30 a.m. to 
5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Savitz Organization, 1845 
Walnut Street, 14th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick W. McDonough, Executive 
Director of the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, 703-414-
3163.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the Advisory 
Committee on Actuarial Examinations will meet at The Savitz 
Organization, 1845 Walnut Street, 14th Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103.
    The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions that 
may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in 
actuarial mathematics, pension law and methodology referred to in 29 
U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B).
    A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that the subject of the 
meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting requirement set 
forth in Title 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest 
requires that such meeting be closed to public participation.

    Dated: March 25, 2015.
Patrick W. McDonough,
Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.
[FR Doc. 2015-07335 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





May 23, 2011





By:
/s/ Pengcheng ChenPengcheng Chen, CEO
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

### ★ ▲ ▲
▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6417

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES TERRENCE BARLOW,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-94-74, CA-98-138-2)

Submitted: October 8, 1998 Decided: October 23, 1998

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Terrence Barlow, Appellant Pro Se. Janet S. Reincke, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Terrence Barlow seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis,

and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

United States v. Barlow, Nos. CR-94-74; CA-98-138-2 (E.D. Va. Mar.

3, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED