alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014182EN.01001701.xml

| 14.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 June 2014

2014/C 182/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3534 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,08 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4588 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79790 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0232 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2178 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1255 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,440 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,60 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1265 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3952 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8752 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4414 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4683 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4909 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5634 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6922 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 379,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5789 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4018 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5785 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 962,62 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3576 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,382 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,6002 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,858 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0289 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6047 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,9130 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3534

JPY

Japanese yen

138,08

DKK

Danish krone

7,4588

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79790

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0232

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2178

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1255

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,440

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,60

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1265

RON

Romanian leu

4,3952

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8752

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4414

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4683

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4909

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5634

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6922

KRW

South Korean won

1 379,66

ZAR

South African rand

14,5789

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4018

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5785

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 962,62

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3576

PHP

Philippine peso

59,382

RUB

Russian rouble

46,6002

THB

Thai baht

43,858

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0289

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6047

INR

Indian rupee

80,9130

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 10.18



February 16, 2005



_____________________



_____________________



_____________________



Dear :



Pursuant to a decision by the Executive Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of Deltic Timber Corporation, attached is the basis of remuneration and other items should our company experience a Change-in-Control*



I am pleased the Committee agreed to extend this potential benefit to you.



Sincerely,



Ray C. Dillon



---

|* | Change-in-control shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Deltic Timber Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







---

A Change-in-Control (CIC) Agreement with a double trigger where in the event a change in control occurs and a
direct report to the President and CEO who is an officer of the Company is dismissed within two years without cause or suffer (i) a reduction in salary and potential bonus and/or (ii) a meaningful diminution of job responsibility as a consequence of
such a change, he would receive the following:



| | a) | One year base salary and target bonus
| | -- | -------------------------------------



| | b) | One year of health and welfare benefits
| | -- | ---------------------------------------



| | c) | Accelerated vesting of all stock options and restricted stock
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------



| | d) | Comprehensive executive outplacement services
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------



| | e) | Should any of these actions attract excise tax, they would be grossed up
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | f) | Any cash payments will be paid in one payment as soon as practicable following the event
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### Williams *against*Baldwin.

A new trial will not be granted,* on the ground of newly discovered evidence, if it appeal* that the evidence might, with reasonable attention and dili-fence, have een procured before the first trial.

It *seems t*that on a motion for a new trial, oh the ground of newly discovered evidence, it is competent to the aaverse party tq show, by affidavit, that the witness whose testimony is stated to be material, and newly discovered, is wholly unworthy of credit.

MOTION, on behalf of the defendant, for a new trial, on the ground of newly discovered evidence. The affidavits on both sides, were submitted to the Court, without argument.

Woodworth, J.

delivered the opinion of the Court. The defendant makes oath, *that since the trial, and not before,*he has discovered that *Stephen Tappen*was a material witness for him on the trial of this cause.

The question submitted to the jury was, whether a certain note of about 200 dollars, in favour of the defendant, against *Rayner*& *Pinney,*and which the defendant had sold to the plaintiff, was, or was not, included in the endorsement of 293 dollars and 50 cents, on the note, upon which the pre sent suit was commenced. The jury believing it was included, gave a verdict for the plaintiff for the whole amount claimed, deducting the endorsement on the note *only.*The affidavit of *Stephen Tappen,*the witness, states, that the note of 200 dollars against *Rayner*& *Pinney,*was *not the consideration of, nor was it included*in, the endorsement of 293 dollars and 50 cents. The testimony, then, if true, is material; and the further inquiry is, whether *laches*is not imputable to the defendant ? If he knew that *Tappen*was a material witness, and that he could'not procure his attendance in time, he ought to have applied to postpone the trial. (2 *Caines,*155. 3 *Caines,*182. 186. 307.)

It appears, from the affidavit of *William H. Sabin,*that, the endorsement is in the hand writing of *Tappen;*that for five or six years last past, he has been in the service of the defendant, and resided near him at the time of trial; that *Harvey Baldwin,*a son of the defendant, who served the notice of motion for a new trial, and who stated, that he was agent for his father, and took upon him the defence of the suit, admitted that he had seen the note, and knew that the *490endorsement was in the hand writing of *Tappen.*These facts seem to establish great inattention in not procuring the testimony of the witness, or in not putting off the trial of the cause; they excite strong suspicion, that the defence is colourable only. The plaintifl has proved, by a number of witnesses, that *Tappen*is wholly unworthy of credit under oath. This it was competent for .him to do. In *Pomeroy*v. *The Columbian Ins. Co.*(2 *Caines,*260.) the plaintiff was permitted to read affidavits to question the credibility of the witness newly discovered.

On the whole, I am of opinion, that there has not been proper diligence to obtain the testimony of *Tappen,*and there are strong grounds to believe his character is infamous.

The motion for a new trial must, therefore, be denied.

Motion denied.
- 1 - 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director and 

Associate General Counsel 

Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

1212 New York Avenue NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

202.842.4184 

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com 

 

February 28, 2012 

Ms. Dorothy Beard 

Chief-Docket Operations 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Delta Air Lines, Inc. Notice of Intent for 

Beyond-Perimeter Slot Usage (DCA-Salt Lake City) 

 Docket DOT-OST-2012-0029 

Dear Ms. Beard: 

Pursuant to Order 2012-2-21, Delta Air Lines, Inc. hereby provides notice of its intent to institute 

new daily nonstop service between Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) and Salt 

Lake City (SLC). Delta plans to begin service on or about June 7, 2012 using B-737, B-757, or 

other suitable aircraft in its fleet. The new schedule is as follows: 

Depart DCA 0745 Arrive SLC 1022 (B-757-200) 

Depart SLC 1650 Arrive DCA 2255 (B-737-800) 

Delta has contacted the FAA Slot Administration Office and informed them of the following daily 

slots to be converted: slot #1643, 2000 hour; slot #1424, 2200 hour. The identified slots are 

currently used for service between DCA and New York LaGuardia, a large hub airport. 

Sincerely, 

Alexander Van der Bellen 

Managing Director, Government Affairs 

 and Associate General Counsel 

cc: brian.ctr.meehan@faa.gov; carl.nelson@aa.com; howard.kass@usairways.com; 

benjamin.slocum@usairways.com; dan.weiss@united.com; steve.morrissey@united.com
1

The Honorable Henry Edward Autrey, United States District Judge for the

Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 02-2178 

 __________

David Brady, *

*

 Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States 

* District Court for the

Michael Dewayne Kennedy, et al., * Eastern District of Arkansas

 * 

 Appellees. * 

 [UNPUBLISHED]

 ___________ 

 

Submitted: January 15, 2003 

Filed: March 11, 2003

____________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, Circuit Judges, and AUTREY,1

 District Judge. 

_____________

PER CURIAM 

 David Brady brought this Civil Rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C §1983

against Michael Kennedy, Arkansas State Police, Larry Norris, Sgt. Williams, Lt.

Dickerson, Marvin Evans, Christopher Morledge, Didi Stallings, and Don Trimble
2

 The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Arkansas. 

3

 The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Judge Dan Felton, Lee County

Sheriff Carl Oxner, Lee County Circuit Clerk Willa Dean Spath, Lee County, Lee County

Quorum Court, Lee County Judge James Keasler, and Lee County Attorney Don Trimble.

4

 The district court dismissed the complaint as to Michael Kennedy, the Arkansas State

Police, Larry Norris, Sgt. Williams, Lt. Dickerson, Marvin Evans, Jr., Christopher Morledge,

DiDi Stallings, Don Trimble, and Judge Harvey Yates.

-2-

in his capacity as a State Prosecuting Attorney. Appellant also asserted claims

pursuant to 42 U.S.C §§1981, 1985, and 1986. This action arose out of his arrest,

conviction, and incarceration on Arkansas state traffic violations. The Appellees

filed a motion for summary judgment as to some claims and motions for dismissal

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) on other claims, wherein Brady sought

damages, declaratory, and injunctive relief. The district court2

 granted summary

judgment3

 in favor of the Appellees and also granted the motion to dismiss4 on

other claims. Brady appeals from both orders. Having reviewed the record, we

find no error in the district court’s rulings. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir.

Rule 47B.

 A true copy.

 Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Exhibit 24.6

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher
Kirk and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his
behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and
perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

| |  | /s/ WILLIAM F. CONCANNONWilliam F. Concannon
| |  | --------------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 60 (Monday, March 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16661]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07142]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Commission Staff Attendance

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives 
notice that members of the Commission's staff may attend the following 
meeting related to the transmission planning activities of the Southern 
Company Services, Inc.
    The Southeastern Regional Transmission Planning (SERTP) Process 
First Quarter Meeting.

March 26, 2015, 10:00 a.m.-1:00 p.m. (Central Time)

    The above-referenced meeting will be via web conference.
    The above-referenced meeting is open to stakeholders.
    Further information may be found at: www.southeasternrtp.com.
    The discussions at the meeting described above may address matters 
at issue in the following proceedings:

Docket Nos. ER13-83, ER13-1928, Duke Energy Carolinas/Carolina Power & 
Light
Docket Nos. ER13-908, ER13-1941, Alabama Power Company et al.
Docket Nos. ER13-913, ER13-1940, Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
Docket Nos. ER13-897, ER13-1930, Louisville Gas and Electric Company 
and Kentucky Utilities Company
Docket Nos. ER13-107, ER13-1935, South Carolina Electric & Gas Company
Docket Nos. ER13-80, ER13-1932, Tampa Electric Company
Docket No. ER13-86, Florida Power Corporation
Docket Nos. ER13-104, ER13-1929, Florida Power & Light Company
Docket No. ER13-1922, Duke Energy Florida (Progress Energy Florida)
Docket Nos. ER13-195, ER13-198, ER13-1927, ER13-1936, PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C.
Docket No. ER13-90, Public Service Electric and Gas Company and PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C.
    For more information, contact Valerie Martin, Office of Energy 
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (202) 502-
6139 or [email protected].

    Dated: March 19, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07142 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
FILED11/13/2015 10:37:52 AMDonna Kay McKinneyBexar County District ClerkAccepted By: Consuelo GomezACCEPTED04-15-00670-CVFOURTH COURT OF APPEALSSAN ANTONIO, TEXAS11/13/2015 4:52:01 PMKEITH HOTTLECLERK
# SanJoaquin Valley AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT

October 8,2007 IWr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluations Section California Air Resources Board P.O. Box 281 5 Sacramento, CA 9581 2 Dear Mr. Guzzetta: Attached isthe Rule Action Packagefor Rule 4682 (Polystyrene Foam, Polyethylene, and Polypropylene Manufacturing), which was adopted bythe San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Governing Board on September 20, 2007;. We request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB)transmit Rule4682 and the appropriate documentation to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. Included with this Rule Action Package are the following attachments: 1. ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 2. ARB APCDIAQMD Rule Evaluation Form 3. Clean Copy of Rule 4682 4. StrikeoutIUnderline Copy of Rule 4682 5. Governing Board Resolution 6. Evidence of Public Hearing 7. Governing Board Memo 8. Staff Report with appendices. -The Rule Action Package is being transmitted by e-mail to ARB staff. Ifyou have any questions, please contact Manuel Salinas at (559) 230-5833 or by e-mail at manuel.salinas@valleyair.org. The District thanks you and your staff for your assistance. Si cerely,



# LJbt

# hi.& Scott Nester Director of Planning Attachments

Printed on recycled paper. 0
# C_2016271EN.01000301.xml

| 26.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 July 2016

(2016/C 271/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0982 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5070 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0839 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4102 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,025 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,64 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3578 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4480 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3277 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4666 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4465 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5190 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5709 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4944 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 250,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,6755 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3356 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4853 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 426,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4692 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,751 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,2651 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,482 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5758 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4059 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,9624 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0982

JPY

Japanese yen

116,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83670

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5070

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0839

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4102

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,025

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,64

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3578

RON

Romanian leu

4,4480

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3277

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4666

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4465

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5190

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5709

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4944

KRW

South Korean won

1 250,46

ZAR

South African rand

15,6755

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3356

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4853

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 426,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4692

PHP

Philippine peso

51,751

RUB

Russian rouble

71,2651

THB

Thai baht

38,482

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5758

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4059

INR

Indian rupee

73,9624

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Wagner v. Wagner.

*Divorce*— Deputization *of sheriff of another county*— Return *of n. e. i. by him invalid*— Necessity *of return of n. e. i. by sheriff of county in which suit is brought.*

The sheriff of the county in which an action of divorce is brought cannot adopt the return of *n. e. i.*of the sheriff of another county whom he has deputized. He must make such return himself in order to make a valid return after he has made diligent search in his own county and certifies that the respondent cannot be found therein.

Divorce. C. P. Allegheny Co., July T., 1920, No. 883.

*Robert R. Elder,*for libellant.

April 15, 1921.

Evans, J.,

The subpoena in this case was issued on May 10, 1920, and the same day the sheriff of this county endorsed upon that subpoena as follows: “I hereby deputize the Sheriff of Beaver County, Penna., to serve the within writ, this 10th day of May, 1920.” For a return of the subpoena the Sheriff of Allegheny County returns as follows: “For return of subpoena, see sheriff’s return hereto attached, by Sheriff of Beaver County. So answers W. S. Haddock, Sheriff of Allegheny County.” Attached to the subpoena is an affidavit of George S. Niver, who makes affidavit that he is deputy for Charles R. Anderson, Sheriff of Beaver County, and that the subpoena was placed in his hands for service, and that he made diligent search and inquiry for the respondent in Midland, Beaver County, Penna., up to and including July 5, 1900, which was the return-day of the writ.

This is not a return of *n. e. i.*of this writ, and the publication of the sheriff’s proclamation on the return of *n. e. i.*to an *alias*writ did not amount to a service on the respondent. The fact that the respondent could not be found in .Beaver County is not material in a divorce case brought in Allegheny County. In order to make a return of *n. e. i.*effective, that return must be made by the Sheriff of Allegheny County. I cannot see how the Sheriff of Allegheny County could make proof of a diligent search for the respondent in this case, for he did not have possession of the writ from the day it was issued until after the return-day of the writ, so that he could not say that he had made diligent search for the respondent in Allegheny County and that he could not be found. A divorce cannot be granted under the present condition of the record. It is returned in order to give the libellant, if she so desires, an opportunity to complete the service and proceed in the cause.

And now, April 15, 1921, this record is returned to the prothonotary’s office, as it is not in proper shape for disposition, there not having been any service upon the respondent.

From Edwin B. Mattern, Pittsburgh, Pa.
CONSENT OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL

EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The
Board of Directors
Turbodyne Technologies Inc.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No. 333-64133) on Form S-8 of Turbodyne Technologies Inc. of our report dated March 15, 1999 relating to the consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows of Turbodyne Technologies Inc. and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December 31, 2000
annual report on Form 10-K of Turbodyne Technologies Inc.

Our
report dated March 15, 1999, contains an explanatory paragraph that states that the Company has suffered recurring losses, has used cash in its operating activities in each of the last three
years, has violated covenants of its debt facilities, has received an adverse award and a judgment in the aggregate amount of $7.1 million related to an arbitration matter and a building lease,
respectively, is subject to class-action lawsuits brought against it by certain of its stockholders, and based upon the Company's projected cash flows for the ensuing year, it will be required to seek
additional financing in order to continue its present operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The aforementioned consolidated
financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

KPMG
LLP

Los
Angeles, California
April 15, 2001

---

QuickLinks
CLIFTON MCNEIL BROOKS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3249

Opinion filed December 6, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition -- Original Jurisdiction.

Clifton McNeil Brooks, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied on the merits.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.