alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2734 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2734

   To require Senate confirmation of the Director of the Centers for 
                    Disease Control and Prevention.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2021

Mr. Lee (for himself, Mr. Tuberville, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Sullivan, and 
  Mr. Braun) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require Senate confirmation of the Director of the Centers for 
                    Disease Control and Prevention.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Trust in Public Health 
Act''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL 
              AND PREVENTION.

    Part A of title III of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 241 
et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 310B. APPOINTMENT OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE 
              CONTROL AND PREVENTION.

    ``The President shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent 
of the Senate, the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention.''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 23, 2016

s1116

Order 

Clerk

November 23, 2016

153733

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153733

COA: 331222

Livingston CC: 15-022673-FC

SABREYIA ALTERESE COLLINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2016 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases of 

People v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos. 152946-

8) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases may 

resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the 

application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Bruce J. Wood, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Weider Nutrition International, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
August 28, 2003

| | /s/BRUCE J. WOOD | 
| | ---------------- | 

| | Bruce J. Wood
Chief Executive Officer | 
| | ------------------------------------- | 

---

QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION 

Appellate case name: Premium Valve Services, LLC v. Comstock Oil & Gas, Comstock Oil 

& Gas—Louisiana, LLC; and Certain Underwriters

Appellate case number: 01-15-00108-CV

Trial court case number: 2009-65461

Trial court: 270th District Court of Harris County

Party filing motion: Appellees

The en banc panel voted unanimously to deny appellees’ motion for en banc 

reconsideration.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd 

 Acting for the Court

En Banc Panel consists of: Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Brown, Huddle, and Lloyd.

J. Massengale, not participating. 

Date: December 1, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               2
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,007
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      5,912
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,243
<PP&E>                                         403,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                 167,846
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 262,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          107,360
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      27,534
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   262,342
<SALES>                                         56,690
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,690
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,291
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,749
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,421)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (58,421)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Summary PBT Profiler Results _TOFA TETA Sanitized
# C_2015327EN.01000701.xml

| 3.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 327/08)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Latvia

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Endangered nature – the Black Stork

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows a black stork (Ciconia nigra) which is considered to be one of the nature conservation flagship species in Europe. In 2005 the Black Stork Protection Plan was adopted in Latvia. At the bottom of the design is the name of the issuing country ‘LATVIJA’ and underneath the year of issuance ‘2015’.

Description of the design

Ciconia nigra

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : October 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Top Image Systems Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ido Schechter, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: April 8, 2008

| |  | /s/ Ido Schechter
Ido SchechterChief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
EXHIBIT 32.2 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ending December31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Héctor Alonso, Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that: 

 

1. The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant. 

 

Date: March 30, 2004
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15213]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06478]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, March 26, 2015 6:30 p.m. to 
March 27, 2015, 4 p.m., Bethesda North Marriott Hotel & Conference 
Center, 5701 Marinelli Road, Bethesda, MD 20852 which was published in 
the Federal Register on February 17, 2015, 80FR8331.
    The meeting notice is amended to change the date and start time to 
be held on March 27, 2015 at 7:30 a.m. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

     Dated: March 17, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-06478 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Civ. No. 8363.

Second Appellate District, Division Two.

June 13, 1934.]

#### ARTHUR J. HERRMANN, Respondent, v. HENRY RIESENBERG et al., Appellants.

Hubert W. Swender for Appellants.

Pease, Holley & Elson for Respondent.

DESMOND, J.

Defendants appeal from a default judgment inadvertently entered prior to disposition of issues raised by their answer, which contained a first and second defense. A demurrer had been interposed to the second defense, and according to the minute order of the court the demurrer “to the complaint” was sustained and ten days given to amend. No amendment being made in ten days, a default was entered, as well as judgment thereon, although the first defense still stood and in itself constituted an answer, raising issues that could be determined only by a trial. A motion was then made by plaintiff under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the default and judgment which had been entered in his favor, but this motion was denied by the trial judge for lack of jurisdiction, the defendants having already taken an appeal to this court. Later 'another judge of the superior court *250undertook to straighten out the record by entering certain *nunc pro tunc*orders sustaining the demurrer “as to the second defense” and allowing ten days for amendment.

Admitting, without deciding, that these *nunc pro tunc*orders may be considered as effectual for the purpose intended, “to make such minute entries speak the truth”, we still are confronted with a judgment taken against defendants who have never had their day in court, at least as to matters of defense raised by the first portion of their answer. It is apparent then that the judgment must be reversed. Since this is so, we believe that the surest and most convenient way to see that justice is done to all parties and at the same time to eliminate the results of errors that may have occurred is to direct that in case a new trial is had, consideration first be given by the court to the motion to strike and to the demurrer which plaintiff has interposed. We are not making an order affirming or reversing the actions of the lower court on either of these matters because of confusion as to what the court did or intended to do in connection therewith.

Judgment reversed,' with directions to the trial court to act in accordance with the foregoing instructions, if the case be retried.

Stephens, P. J., and Scott, J., *pro tem.,*concurred.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16980]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07319]

[[Page 16980]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2015-0066]

Notice of Enforcement for Special Local Regulations; RiverFest; 
Port Neches, TX

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce Special Local Regulations for the 
RiverFest Power Boat races on the Neches River in Port Neches, TX from 
2 p.m. on May 1, 2015, through 6 p.m. on May 3, 2015. This action is 
necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew, 
spectators, participating vessels, non-participating vessels and other 
users of the waterway. During the enforcement periods no person or 
vessel may enter the zone established by the Special Local Regulation 
without permission of the Captain of the Port (COTP) Port Arthur or his 
designated on-scene Patrol Commander.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 100.801 will be enforced from 2 p.m. 
to 6 p.m. on May 1, 2015; and from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. on May 2 and 3, 
2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice 
of enforcement, call or email Mr. Scott Whalen, U.S. Coast Guard Marine 
Safety Unit Port Arthur, TX; telephone 409-719-5086, email 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    The Coast Guard will enforce Special Local Regulation for the 
annual boat races in 33 CFR 100.801(60) on May 1, 2015, from 2 p.m. to 
6 p.m. and on May 2 and 3, 2015 from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.801, a vessel may not enter the 
regulated area, unless it receives permission from the Captain of the 
Port or his designated on-scene Patrol Commander. Spectator vessels may 
safely transit outside the regulated area but may not anchor, block, 
loiter, or impede participants or official patrol vessels. The Coast 
Guard may be assisted by other federal, state or local law enforcement 
agencies in enforcing this regulation.
    This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 100.801 and 33 
U.S.C. 1233. In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the 
Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with notification of 
this enforcement period via Local Notice to Mariners, Safety Marine 
Information Broadcasts, and Marine Safety Information Bulletins.
    If the Captain of the Port or his designated on-scene Patrol 
Commander determines that the regulated area need not be enforced for 
the full duration stated in this notice, he or she may use a Broadcast 
Notice to Mariners to grant general permission to enter the regulated 
area.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
R. S. Ogrydziak,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Port Arthur.
[FR Doc. 2015-07319 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
```
Order entered December 1, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01312-CV

IN RE KENNETH L. BUHOLTZ, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-51173-2010

ORDER

Before the Court is relator’s November 8, 2016 petition for writ of mandamus. The 

Court requests that the Real Party in Interest and Respondent file their responses to the petition, 

if any, on or before December 15, 2016. 

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Mr. J. R. Stroble 

Manager, National TRU Program 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

MAY 3 0 2013 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

This letter forwards two documents we referenced in the enclosure to our April 1 0 letter transmitting 

actions we may take to improve efficiency when evaluating Department of Energy's (DOE) Tier I (Tl) 

change requests. We have provided these documents previously. Enclosure 1 is an annotated outline 

indicating which waste characterization-related documents EPA uses when evaluating site-specific 

transuranic (TRU) waste characterization programs and reporting results of our evaluation. Enclosures 

2A and 28 are checklists that EPA inspectors use to determine the completeness ofDOE Tl change 

requests and baselines and request additional documents, as necessary. We believe that implementation 

of these enclosures by TRU Sites' waste characterization staff in preparing EPA's approval request 

package will facilitate efficient transfer of documents to EPA. In turn, these actions will support EPA's 

timely evaluation ofTI change requests. 

We look forward to learn what actions CBFO intends to undertake to meet the essence of the 

streamlined approach both DOE and EPA agreed upon at the November 2012 meeting. 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422 or 

Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462. 

~~ Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Enclosures 

lntemet Address (URL) • http:/lwww.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper 
cc: Electronic Distribution 

Doug Tonkay, DOE HQ EM 

Alton Harris, DOE HQ EM 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Tom Morgan, CBFO NTP 

Marcus Pinzel, CBFO NTP 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO NTP 

Manager, CBFO QA 

Ben Roberts, DOE ID 

Jerry Wells, DOE ID 

Dave Haar, AMWTP ITG 

Tim Hall, NMED 

Raymond Lee, EPA HQ 

Site Documents
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 60 (Monday, March 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16642-16643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

    The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of 
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
    Agency: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
    Title: Deep Seabed Mining Exploration Licenses.
    OMB Control Number: 0648-0145.
    Form Number(s): None.
    Type of Request: Regular (extension of a currently approved 
information collection).
    Number of Respondents: 1.
    Average Hours per Response: License renewals, 200 (annualized over 
5 years to 40 hours); annual reports, 20 hours.
    Burden Hours: 60.
    Needs and Uses: This request is for extension of a currently 
approved information collection.
    NOAA's regulations at 15 CFR part 970 govern the issuing and 
monitoring of exploration licenses under the Deep Seabed Hard Mineral 
Resources Act. Any persons seeking a license must submit certain 
information that allows NOAA to ensure the applicant meets the 
standards of the Act. Persons with licenses are required to conduct 
monitoring and make reports, and they may request revisions, transfers, 
or extensions of licenses.

[[Page 16643]]

    Affected Public: Business or other for-profit organizations.
    Frequency: Annually and every five years.
    Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or maintain benefits.
    This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov. 
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections 
currently under review by OMB.
    Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information 
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice 
to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b8f7f1eaf9e7ebcddad5d1cbcbd1d7d6f8d7d5da96ddd7c896dfd7ce"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="47080e1506181432252a2e34342e282907282a256922283769202831">[email protected]</span></a> or fax to (202) 395-5806.

    Dated: March 24, 2015.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-07149 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-08-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2015 - 1986 Directorate Identifier: 2012NM100AD

ATR42 - 27 - 0104 --- 12/17/10 ATR42 - 27 - 0105 --- 2/17/11 ATR72 - 27 - 1065 --- 4/15/10 ATR72 - 27 - 1065, R01 --- 12/17/10 ATR72 - 27 - 1066 --- 2/17/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008