alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       3,960,991
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      30,845,417
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        40,414,788
<LOANS>                                    128,961,641
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,200,586
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             218,085,514
<DEPOSITS>                                 194,687,494
<SHORT-TERM>                                 3,520,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          2,265,913
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,895
<OTHER-SE>                                  17,594,212
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             218,085,514
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             12,217,381
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,717,566
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               986,139
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            15,921,086
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           9,049,314
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,251,275
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,669,811
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  637,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,813,090
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,280,176
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,502,501
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,502,121
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.83
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.10
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,218,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                 3,571,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,234,309
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  717,722
<RECOVERIES>                                    46,999
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,200,586
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### Van Dresar vs. Coyle and others.

*Vacating Judgment.*

It is the settled law in this state that the circuit court has no jurisdiction to review a judgment rendered at a former term, for the purpose of correcting its own errors, or to vacate such judgment for errors in law or fact committed by the court in rendering it or in the proceedings prior thereto.

APPEAL from the- Circuit Court for *Fond du Lac*County.

This .action was brought to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant *Coyle*to the plaintiff. The summons was personally served on all the defendants, and all of them made default. Judgment of foreclosure, etc., in the usual form was rendered by the court, and was followed by a sale of the mortgaged premises and by confirmation of the report of sale. At a term subsequent to that at which the judgment was entered, the court granted a motion of the defendants to vacate the judgment and for leave to answer; which motion was founded upon certain alleged errors and irregularities in the judgment and prior proceedings. The plaintiff appealed from the order.

*Boland & Matteson,*with *F. S. Bragg*of counsel, for appellant.

*Priest &*Carter, for respondent.

LyoN, J.

No rulé of law is better settled in this state than the rule that the circuit court has no jurisdiction to review a judgment rendered at a former term for the purpose of correcting its own errors, or to vacate such judgment for errors inlaw or fact committed by the court in rendering it or in the proceedings prior thereto. The cases in which this court has so held are numerous. Among them are *Pinger v. Van Click,*36 Wis., 141; *Bonnell v. Gray,*id., 374; *Quaw v. Lameraux,*id., 626; in which are cited many others to the same effect.

*673In this case tbe motion is made exclusively upon the ground that there were errors in the judgment and prior proceedings. Such errors (if they exist) were committed by the court. Hence, the court had no power to correct them at a term subsequent to that at which the judgment was rendered. That can only be done on an appeal from the judgment.

It follows that the order from which this appeal was taken, must be reversed.

*By the Court.*— Order reversed.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


By signing below, the Principal Financial Officer hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report on Form 10-QSB fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hybrid Fuels Inc.



Signed this 20th day of November 2006:



By: /s/ Douglas Dickie
---------------------------
Douglas Dickie
Principal Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hybrid Fuels Inc. and will be
retained by Hybrid Fuels Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

The Board of Directors and Stockholders 

Tumbleweed Communications Corp.: 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-84683, 333-43194, 333-48636, 333-49492, 333-61076, 333-101018, 333-103043, 333-106913, 333-114340, and 333-114780) on Form S-8 of TumbleweedCommunications Corp. of our reports dated March 14, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements ofoperations, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reportingas of December 31, 2006, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in this December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Tumbleweed Communications Corp.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions ofStatement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based Payment.* Also, as discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of quantifying financial statement errors in2006. 

/s/    KPMG LLP 

Mountain View, California 

March 14, 2007
Pursuant to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 30069 C onfer enc e Cal endar
UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee
v. F RA NKI E L
. HI L L I AR D D e fe nda nt
- Appe l l ant

A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f ort he M i ddl e D i st r i c t of Loui si ana U SD C N o. 3: 04- C R
- 144- 2
B ef ore H IG G IN B O T H A M , D AV IS, an d C L E M E N T , C i rcui t Ju dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * The Fed e r alPubl i c D e fe nde r a ppo i nt e d t o r e pr e s e nt F ran ki e L. H i l l i ar d has m o ve d f

o rl e av e t o w i t hdr aw and has f i l e d a b r i e f

i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d ers v . C a lif o rn ia , 38 6 U
. S. 73 8 ( 19 67 )
. H i l l i ar d has f i l e d a r e s po ns e . O ur i n dep en den trevi ew of t h e rec ord, coun sel ’ s bri ef, an d H i l l i ard ’ s r espon se di scl oses n o non f

ri vol o u s i ssue f

or app eal
. A ccor di n gl y, coun sel ’ s m ot i on f or l eave to w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r espon sibi l i t i es h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D
. S ee 5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D Aug ust18, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
Exhibit 10.1 


 


AMENDMENT
TO

Employment AGREEMENT


 


This
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”)
is made and entered into on October 13, 2021, by and between Hyliion Holdings Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”),
and Patrick Sexton (“Employee”).
Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings given to them in the Agreement (as defined below). 


 


WHEREAS,
the parties entered into that certain Employment Agreement on December 2, 2020, which was retroactively effective as of October 1, 2020
(as amended, the “Agreement”);
and


 


WHEREAS,
the parties desire to make certain amendments to the Agreement to reflect their mutual understanding and agreement with respect to Employee’s
compensation.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the promises and mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows:


 


1. Amendment.
Section 3(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


“(a) Base
Salary. During the Employment Period, the Company shall pay to Employee an annualized base salary of $325,000 (the “Base
Salary”) in consideration for
Employee’s services under this Agreement, payable in
substantially equal installments in conformity with the Company’s
customary payroll practices for similarly situated employees as may exist from time to time, but no less frequently than monthly.
Employee’s Base Salary will be reviewed annually by the CEO
based on the performance of the Employee and the Company. The CEO may, but will not be required to, increase the Base Salary during
the Initial and any Renewal Term.”


 


2.  Miscellaneous.
This Amendment shall constitute an amendment pursuant to and in accordance with Section 16 of the Agreement. Except as specifically modified
by this Amendment, the terms of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect after the date hereof, and any reference to the Agreement
shall mean the Agreement, as amended and modified hereby. The provisions of Sections 14-20 and 26 of the Agreement shall apply to this
Amendment, mutatis mutandis.


 


[Signature Page Follows]


 






    HYLN - Amendment to P. Sexton Employment Agreement


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties have duly executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.


 


	 	EMPLOYEE
	 	 	 
	 	/s/ Patrick Sexton
	 	 	 
	 	HYLIION HOLDINGS CORP.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Thomas Healy
	 	Name:  	Thomas Healy
	 	Title: 	Founder and CEO



 


[Signature Page to Amendment to Employment Agreement]
Exhibit 99.32

News
Release
September 1, 2000

Trading Symbols:TRBD (EASDAQ)

TURBODYNE UPDATES LEGAL AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS

Carpinteria, CaliforniaSeptember 1, 2000Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.
(EASDAQ: TRBD) reports the following updates on legal affairs and financial matters:

TST Files Motion for Prejudgment Writ of Attachment

Turbodyne announced today that it was served with a motion for a prejudgment writ of attachment by TST on August 23, 2000. The motion is scheduled to be
heard on September 19, 2000, in the Superior Court of the County of San Bernardino. The Company expects to file an opposition to the motion. However, the Company is currently conferring with
its counsel and the other named defendants regarding all of its alternatives.

TST's
original claim was made against Pacific Baja Light Metals in its bankruptcy proceedings for approximately $1.5 million. Subsequently, TST, Inc. filed suit against
Turbodyne and other defendants on March 13, 2000 and increased their claim to approximately $1.8 million plus interest, costs and attorneys' fees for materials sold to Pacific Baja and
guaranteed by Turbodyne. Turbodyne has filed its response to the complaint and has been involved in limited discovery, but to date, no hearings have taken place.

Turbodyne Updates Financial Matters

Turbodyne further announces that it has secured funds in the amount of $262,000.00 and commitments for funding in the amount of $100,000.00, through private
placements to accredited investors and/or directors of the Company of 812,405 shares and option exercises by existing optionees of 40,000 shares, that will provide the Company with operating capital
through approximately the first week of October, 2000. The Company continues to work on securing both short-term and long-term financing. In a renewed effort to reduce expenditures, the Company has
done another round of personnel cutbacks, further reducing its workforce by 30%, and continues to seek alternative ways to reduce its operating costs. The most recent personnel cutbacks will not
affect the Turbodyne joint development program with Honeywell in any way.

As
of the date of this release, Turbodyne has 53,411,067 issued and outstanding shares and 1,914,997 warrants.

Turbodyne
Technologies, Inc., a California based high technology company, specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion engines and the
development and manufacturing of high-tech assemblies for electrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies' headquarters is located in Carpinteria, California, and its
European office is located in Frankfurt, Germany.

Contacts:

Kenneth
FitzpatrickInvestor Relations at California Headquarters: (805) 684-4551
Markus KumbrinkInvestor Relations at Frankfurt: +49-69-69-76-73-13

This
release contains forward-looking statements as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including statements about future business operations, financial
performance and market conditions. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties inherent in business forecasts.

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                     AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

         In connection with the Report of Accesspoint, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
D. Lindberg, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                        ACCESSPOINT CORPORATION

November 9, 2005                        By /S/ WILLIAM D. LINDBERG
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William D. Lindberg,
                                        Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
                                        Officer and President
# C_2016311EN.01000201.xml

| 26.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 August 2016

(2016/C 311/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1290 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4441 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85570 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4956 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0905 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2771 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,026 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3123 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4526 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3219 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4840 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4597 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7553 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5453 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5277 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 260,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,9528 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5146 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4916 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 973,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5474 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,347 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,2200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,032 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6365 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8385 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,6974 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1290

JPY

Japanese yen

113,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4441

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85570

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4956

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0905

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2771

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,026

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3123

RON

Romanian leu

4,4526

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3219

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4840

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4597

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7553

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5453

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5277

KRW

South Korean won

1 260,33

ZAR

South African rand

15,9528

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5146

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4916

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 973,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5474

PHP

Philippine peso

52,347

RUB

Russian rouble

73,2200

THB

Thai baht

39,032

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6365

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8385

INR

Indian rupee

75,6974

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016187EN.01000301.xml

| 26.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/3

---

Notice of invitation to tender for the buying-in of skimmed milk powder by the paying agencies

(2016/C 187/03)

| 1. | A tendering procedure for the buying-in of skimmed milk powder by the paying agencies has been opened by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/826 (1). The applicable provisions are laid down in Section III of Chapter I of Title II of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 (2). |
| --- | --- |

1.

A tendering procedure for the buying-in of skimmed milk powder by the paying agencies has been opened by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/826 (1). The applicable provisions are laid down in Section III of Chapter I of Title II of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 (2).

1

2

| 2. | The time limit for the submission of tenders for the first individual invitation to tender shall be 7 June 2016. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The time limit for the submission of tenders for the first individual invitation to tender shall be 7 June 2016.

7 June 2016

| 3. | Tenders shall be submitted to the paying agencies. The addresses of the paying agencies are available on the European Commission website: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/milk/policy-instruments/index_en.htm |
| --- | --- |

3.

Tenders shall be submitted to the paying agencies. The addresses of the paying agencies are available on the European Commission website: http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/milk/policy-instruments/index_en.htm

---

(1)  OJ L 137, 26.5.2016, p. 19.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 of 11 December 2009 laying down common detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards buying-in and selling of agricultural products under public intervention (OJ L 349, 29.12.2009, p. 1).

2

---
DFW Area Fourth Highest 8-hour Ozone C oncentrations and Design Values (ppm), 1 2011-2013 Site Name and Number 4 th Highest Daily Max Design Value (2011-2013) 2011 2012 2013 Fort Worth Northwest 48-439-1002 0.082 0.077 0.084 0.081 Keller 48-439-2003 0.097 0.079 0.080 0.085 Frisco 48-085-0005 0.091 0.084 0.078 0.084 Midlothian OFW 48-139-0016 0.080 0.078 0.075 0.077 Denton Airport South 48-121-0034 0.095 0.081 0.085 0.087 Arlington Municipal Airport 48-439-3011 0.080 0.092 0.068 0.080 Dallas North No. 2 48-113-0075 0.088 0.086 0.077 0.083 Rockwall Heath 48-397-0001 0.080 0.080 0.073 0.077 Grapevine Fairway 48-439-3009 0.091 0.086 0.083 0.086 Kaufman 48-257-0005 0.074 0.073 0.075 0.074 Eagle Mountain Lake 48-439-0075 0.080 0.087 0.077 0.081 Parker County 48-367-0081 0.088 0.076 0.074 0.079 Cleburne Airport 48-251-0003 0.079 0.082 0.077 0.079 Dallas Hinton St. 48-113-0069 0.084 0.087 0.081 0.084 Dallas Executive Airport 48-113-0087 0.082 0.085 0.074 0.080 Pilot Point 48-121-1032 0.091 0.078 0.084 0.084 Italy 48-139-1044 0.075 0.071 0.072 0.072

1 Design value calculations for the 1997 ozone standard are based on a rolling three-year average of the annual 4th highest values (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix I).