alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April 2, 2015 at 2:00 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Piwowar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: March 26, 2015.

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-07422 Filed 3-27-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
RAOUL LORJUSTE,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3693

Opinion filed December 6, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Raoul Lorjuste, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 

807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          10,283
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,656
<ALLOWANCES>                                       191
<INVENTORY>                                        363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,870
<PP&E>                                           4,324
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,395
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,758
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        23,625
<OTHER-SE>                                    (10,499)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,799
<SALES>                                         24,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,434
<CGS>                                           20,070
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,113
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   155
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 147
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,051)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (78)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,973)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.90)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         I , Daniel A. France, certify that:

         1.) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kushi
Natural Foods Corp.

         2.) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

         4.) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

         a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

         b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

         c. Presented in the quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

         5.) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the Audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

         a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

         b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls;

         6.) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2003

/s/ DANIEL A. FRANCE
--------------------
Daniel A. France, Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

                                       11
<PAGE>


                                   Exhibit 8.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of API Electronics Group Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Phillip
DeZwirek, Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


/s/ Phillip DeZwirek
-------------------------

Phillip DeZwirek
Vice Chairman, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
November 27, 2002
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00611-CV

Sandra Campos VIDALES,

Appellant

v.

Raymond CAMPOS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CV04500

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. We order 

appellee recover appellee’s costs in this appeal from appellant. 

SIGNED December 7, 2016.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of Oplink Communications, Inc.
 Name of Subsidiary
    
    Jurisdiction of IncorporationShanghai Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Shanghai, ChinaZhuhai FTZ Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Zhuhai, ChinaZhuhai FTZ Oplink Optical Communications, Inc.
    
    Zhuhai, ChinaZhuhai FTZ Telelight Communications, Inc.
    
    Zhuhai, ChinaOplink Macau Commercial Services Company Limited
    
    Macau, ChinaAccumux Technologies, Inc.
    
    California, USACayman Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Cayman Islands, B.W.I.King Galaxy International Limited
    
    British Virgin Islands
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07451]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Art Advisory Panel--Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of closed meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in New 
York, NY.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 15, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held at 
290 Broadway, New York, NY 10007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John P. O'Dea, 290 Broadway, New York, 
NY, 10007. Telephone (212) 298-2132 (not a toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a 
closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held at 290 Broadway, 
New York, NY 10007. The agenda will consist of the review and 
evaluation of the acceptability of fair market value appraisals of 
works of art involved in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. 
This will involve the discussion of material in individual tax returns 
made confidential by the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103. A determination 
as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act has 
been made that this meeting is concerned with matters listed in section 
552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), of the Government in Sunshine Act and 
that the meeting will not be open to the public.

Kirsten B. Wielobob,
Chief, Appeals.
[FR Doc. 2015-07451 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                      21,108,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               50,923,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 3,374,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            72,525,000
<PP&E>                                      27,262,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,658,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             379,912,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       42,815,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                   174,133,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  21,385,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               379,912,000
<SALES>                                    178,976,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           178,976,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              151,100,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             1,163,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,341,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             25,372,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                10,656,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         14,716,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                14,716,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1 – CEO 906
Certification




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Iain. A. McCready,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.      The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.      The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.







Date:   April14,
    2009
            /s/ Iain A. McCreadyIain
      A. McCreadyChief
      Executive Officer and PrincipalExecutive
      Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Velocity Energy Inc. (the “Company”) for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald E. Vandenberg, Chief
Executive Officer, and I, Donald J. Sebastian, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to our
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/S/
      Donald E. Vandenberg
                  
                  /s/
      Donald J. SebastianDonald
      E. Vandenberg
                  
                  Donald
      J. SebastianChief
      Executive Officer/Principal Executive Officer
                  
                  Chief
      Financial Officer/Principal Financial OfficerAugust
      14, 2009
                  
                  August
      14, 2009
#### Huffman *v.*Thompson, Appellant.

October 7, 1907:

Argued April 15, 1907.

Appeal, No. 171, April T., 1907, by J. Y. Thompson, from judgment of C. P. Greene Co., Feb. T., 1906, No. 95, on case stated-to determine the marketable title to real estate in suit of Elizabeth S. Huffman and Joseph Huffman v. J. V. Thompson.

Before Rice, P. J., Henderson Morrison, Orlady, Head and Beaver, JJ.

Affirmed.

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The same question arises in this case which was considered and determined in an opinion this day filed in the case of Louie Throckmorton and Charles Throckmorton v. J. V. Thompson, ante, p. 214. We there held that Louie Throckmorton took an estate in a fee under the will of her father, David W. Frye, as a result of which she had capacity to convey a good title to the defendant. It follows that the title of the plaintiffs set forth in the case stated is a valid title.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

ORDER AMENDING RULES

906 AND 1911 OF THE 

PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF 

APPELLATE PROCEDURE

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 265

APPELLATE PROCEDURAL RULES 

DOCKET 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of December, 2016, upon the recommendation of the 

Appellate Court Procedural Rules Committee; the proposal having been submitted 

without publication pursuant to Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(a) in the interest of efficient 

administration:

It is ORDERED pursuant to Article V, Section 10 of the Constitution of 

Pennsylvania that Rules 906 and 1911 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate 

Procedure are amended in the attached form.

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective January 1, 2017.

Additions to the rules are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rules are shown in bold and brackets.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 31, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10954 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ANANIAS DEMETRIUS NICKERSON, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:99-CR-112-6

--------------------

Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Ananias Nickerson pleaded guilty of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base; he was sentenced to 27 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release. He appeals the threeyear term of imprisonment imposed following the revocation of his term of supervised release. Nickerson argues that the district court erred by refusing to hold his revocation hearing within a reasonable time under FED. R.No. 05-10954 -2- CRIM. P. 32.1. The Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial is not applicable to revocation hearings. See United States v. Tippens , 39 F.3d 88, 89-90 (5th Cir. 1994). The right to a revocation hearing accrues once the warrant has been executed and the defendant has been taken into federal custody. Id. Nevertheless, due process rights may be impeded by a delay in the execution of a warrant “if the delay undermines [defendant’s] ability to contest the issue of the violation or to proffer mitigating evidence.” Id. The record does not reflect that Nickerson suffered any specific prejudice from the delay in executing the warrant. Moreover, the two-month delay between the execution of the warrant and the revocation hearing was not unreasonable. Nickerson argues that the sentence is unreasonable. Although the three-year term of imprisonment imposed on revocation of supervised release exceeded the sentencing range indicated by the policy statements in chapter 7 of the sentencing guidelines, it did not exceed the statutory maximum term of imprisonment the district court could have imposed. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Accordingly, Nickerson’s revocation sentence was neither “unreasonable” nor “plainly unreasonable.” See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 1804 (2006). AFFIRMED.
{"id":645652,"date":"2024-04-17T16:15:00","date_gmt":"2024-04-17T20:15:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/?post_type=topic&p=645652"},"modified":"2024-04-17T16:15:01","modified_gmt":"2024-04-17T20:15:01","slug":"gfssp-download-page","status":"publish","type":"topic","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/gfssp-download-page\/","title":{"rendered":"GFSSP Download Page"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":true},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":true},"author":675,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"template":"","meta":{"nasa_hds_core_meta_l10n":"en-US","nasa_hds_core_meta_article_editor":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_article_contacts":[],"nasa_hds_core_meta_article_topic":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_linked_locations":[],"nasa_hds_core_meta_article_related_articles":[],"hds_migrate_meta_pr_release_id":"","hds_migrate_meta_pr_release_type":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_location_x":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_location_y":"","nasa_hds_core_meta_gallery_images":[]},"categories":[],"news-tags":[],"internal-terms":[],"coauthors":[13229],"parsely":{"version":"1.1.0","meta":[],"rendered":"","tracker_url":"https:\/\/cdn.parsely.com\/keys\/nasa.gov\/p.js"},"read_time":1,"time_ago":"2 months","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic\/645652"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/topic"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/675"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic\/645652\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":649314,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/topic\/645652\/revisions\/649314"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=645652"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=645652"},{"taxonomy":"news-tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/news-tags?post=645652"},{"taxonomy":"internal-terms","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/internal-terms?post=645652"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=645652"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
#### Jackson, *ex dem.*Bond and others, *against*Root.

Thefeespaid for *exempHfi-cords,*pvodu-cedtn evidence on the trial of a cause, may be taxed in the covered in the suit,

A question arose as to the taxation of the costs in this cause, in which judgment was given for the defendant in term last: (vide *S. C.ante,*60.) namely, whether the *°*' *ri*• cost of the *exemplifications of the records*given in evidence, - at the trial, on the part of the defendant, could be taxed as part of the costs to be recovered by him against the plaintiff.

*T.*Birdseye, for the defendant.

*E. Griffin,*contra.

*Per Curiam.*

The cost of the exemplifications are a pro» per charge, and ought to be taxed.