alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 14-743V 

Filed: December 30, 2015 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

NANCY RIGGS, *

 * Joint Stipulation on Damages; Influenza 

Petitioner, * (Flu) Vaccine; Transverse Myelitis 

 * 

v. * 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * 

 * 

Respondent. *

 *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Isaiah R. Kalinowski, Esq., Maglio Christopher and Toale, Washington, DC, for petitioner. 

Althea W. Davis, Esq., US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Roth, Special Master: 

 Nancy Riggs [“petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine 

Injury Compensation Program2on August 18, 2014. Petitioner alleges that she developed 

transverse myelitis as a result of receiving an influenza vaccination on December 6, 2012. See 

Stipulation, filed December 30, 2015, at ¶¶ 1-4. Respondent denies that the influenza 

vaccination caused petitioner’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6. 

 Nevertheless, the parties have agreed to settle the case. On December 30, 2015, the 

parties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms. 

 

Respondent agrees to issue the following payment: 

 

1

 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this 

decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 

Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). In 

accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), a party has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other 

information, that satisfies the criteria in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B). Further, consistent with the rule 

requirement, a motion for redaction must include a proposed redacted decision. If, upon review, I agree that the 

identified material fits within the requirements of that provision, I will delete such material from public access. 

2

 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of 

citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
2

A lump sum of $95,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Nancy 

Riggs. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available 

under § 300aa-15(a). 

 I adopt the parties’ stipulation attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount 

and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in 

accordance with this decision.3 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Mindy Michaels Roth 

 Special Master 

 

 

3

 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the 

right to seek review.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-132152 and333-132800 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-141742 on Form S-3 of our report datedFebruary 29, 2008, relating to the financial statements of Mariner Energy, Inc., and theeffectiveness of Mariner Energy Inc’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in theAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Mariner Energy, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPDeloitte & Touche LLPHouston, Texas
# C_2016125EN.01000101.xml

| 8.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 125/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 125/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7952 — Bridgepoint Group/Smyk Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 125/01)

On 1 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7952. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7952. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Motion Denied as Moot and Order filed December 1, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00236-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF M.S.G., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-72168

ORDER

This case is scheduled to be submitted on the briefs on December 21, 2016. 

On November 8, 2016, appellant Meagan Nicole Wiler filed a motion for a one-day 

extension to file her reply brief. The reply brief has not been filed.

Because the date requested by the motion for extension has passed and the 

reply brief has not been filed, the motion is denied as moot. However, the court will 

consider a reply brief that is filed by December 12, 2016.

PER CURIAM
EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-27973 of Weider Nutrition International, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report
dated July 9, 1998, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Weider
Nutrition International, Inc. for the year ended May 31, 1998.

Our audit of the financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
also included the financial statement schedule of Weider Nutrition
International, Inc., listed in Item 14. This financial statement schedule is the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, such financial statement schedule,
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
August 27, 1998
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
    
    The Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Michael K. RobinsonMichael K. RobinsonChief Executive Officer,
President and Assistant Treasurer
**CERTIFICATION        OF **

**CHIEF        EXECUTIVE OFFICER **

**PURSUANT        TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (i)   | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company, for the fiscal                quarter                ended June 30, 2006, and to which this certification is attached                as                Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended;                and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (ii)   | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         |            |   |                                      |
|--------------|-----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|    |       |   |                                 |
|         | By:   |   | /s/ Rajesh                    Raniga |
|         | Name:           |   | Rajesh                    Raniga          |
|         | Title:          |   | Chief Financial Officer                   |
|         | Date:           |   | August 23, 2006                           |
|         |            |   |

*A        signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained        by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or        its        staff upon request.*

*This        certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated        by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933        or        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date        of        the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained        in such filing.*
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

VSE Corporation ) ASBCA No. 63617

)

Under Contract No. N00024

- 11

- D

- 4229 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Nicole J. Owren

- Wiest, Esq.

Erin N. Rankin, Esq.

Charles Baek, Esq.

Crowell & Moring LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Adrianne L. Goins, Esq.

Trial Attorney

Defense Contract Management Agency

Chantilly, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 4, 2024

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63617

, Appeal of VSE

Corporation , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 5, 2024 JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**288 CAF 10-00644**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND GREEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF STEUBEN COUNTY SUPPORT COLLECTION UNIT AND JUDITH A. ROSE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
NEIL T. KELLY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ROSEMARIE RICHARDS, SOUTH NEW BERLIN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. ALAN P. REED, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BATH (RUTH A. CHAFFEE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), entered March 2, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order determined, inter alia, that respondent had willfully failed to obey an order of the court. It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Matter of Hess v Flint , 5 AD3d 1079).

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan Clerk of the Court
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00734

- CV

IN THE MATTER OF A.J.R.P.

From the 386th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013JUV00669

Honorable Laura Parker, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

SIGNED July 16, 2014.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

OF

VYYO INC.



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Vyyo Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Davidi
Gilo, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Arik Levi, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of
his knowledge, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Davidi Gilo        
|Davidi Gilo            
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 12, 2005        
|                       
|/s/ Arik Levi          
|Arik Levi              
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 12, 2005
EX-4.36



 Exhibit 4.36 
 EQUITY INTEREST TRANSFER AGREEMENT 
 This transfer agreement (the
“Agreement”) is made and entered into on March 20, 2012 (the “Effective Date”) in Shanghai by and between the following two parties: 
 Transferor (the “Party A”): Shanghai Zhengduo Information Technology Co., Ltd 

Registered Place of Business: Room 1006, No.165, Caoxi Road, Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China 

Transferee (the “Party B”): Shanghai Giant Network Technology Co., Ltd 
 Registered Place of Business: Room 708, Building No.29, No. 396, Guilin Road, Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China 
 RECITALS 
 WHEREAS, the registered capital of Shanghai Juxi Network Technology Co.,
Ltd. (the “Target Company”) is 3.09643 million RMB, among which 1.3 million RMB was contributed by Party A that accounts for 41.9838% of the entire registered capital. 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of relevant laws and regulations of the People’s Republic of China, and of the mutual covenants and
agreements hereinafter set forth based on the principles of equity, good faith, open, fair and impartial, the parties agree as follows: 
  

	1.	SUBJECT MATTER AND PRICE 

  

	1.1	Party A agree to transfer the 41.9838% equity interest it held in the Target Company to Party B for the price of 1.3 million RMB. 


 

	1.2	Other interest collateral to the equity interest shall be transferred with the equity interest. 


 

	1.3	The Transferee should pay off the entire purchase price of the equity interest to the Transferor within five days from the date of signing of this Agreement.


  

	2.	PROMISES AND WARRANTIES 


Party A promises that the equity interest it transferred to Party B under Article 1 of this Agreement was legally owned by it, and Party A
has completed and effectual right of disposition on the equity interest. Party A also ensures that there are no mortgages, other rights of security or third-party right of recourse on the transferred equity interest. 

  
 1 









	3.	LIABILITIES FOR BREACH 


The defaulting party shall reimburse the damages of the other party. 

 

	4.	RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES 


This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the People’s Republic of China. 

If any dispute shall arise in connection with this Agreement, the parties may solve the disputes by good faith negotiations. If the
dispute cannot be resolved through good faith negotiations, either party may submit the dispute to be resolved by the People’s Court of Shanghai Xuhui District. 
  

	5.	MISCELLANEOUS 

  

	5.1.	This Agreement is made in four counterparts. Each party of this Agreement has one counterpart and the Target Company holds two counterparts that shall be used during
relevant procedures. 

  

	5.2.	This Agreement shall take effect upon seal by both parties. 

  

			
	 PARTY A (SEAL): SHANGHAI ZHENGDUO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

		
	DATE:	 	
	
	 PARTY B (SEAL): SHANGHAI GIANT NETWORK TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD

		
	DATE:	 	


  
 2
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Deltic Timber Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statements (No. 333-34317, No. 333-76294, and No. 333-90026) on Form S-8 of Deltic Timber Corporation of our reports dated March 8, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Deltic Timber Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006,
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2006 annual report on Form 10-K of Deltic Timber Corporation.

Our report refers to changes in the method of accounting for:
(1) quantifying errors in 2006; (2) accounting for share-based compensation awards in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment, effective January 1, 2006; and (3)
accounting for defined benefit pension and other post retirement plans in accordance with SFAS

No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Post Retirement Plans, effective December 31, 2006.



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP                       
|                                   
|KPMG LLP                           
|Shreveport, Louisiana March 8,
2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8130

LARRY COCHRAN, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. KUMA DEBOO, Warden; BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:08-cv-00126-JPB-JSK)

Submitted: November 19, 2008 Decided: December 5, 2008

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Cochran, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Larry Cochran, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cochran v. Deboo , No. 3:08-cv-00126-JPBJSK (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 22, 2008). We deny the motion for preparation of a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2015413EN.01000301.xml

| 12.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7785 — Triton/Imtech Nordic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 413/02)

On 29 October 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7785. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7785. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015421EN.01001001.xml

| 17.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/10

---

Special Report No 16/2015

‘Improving the security of energy supply by developing the internal energy market: more efforts needed’

(2015/C 421/06)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 16/2015 ‘Improving the security of energy supply by developing the internal energy market: more efforts needed’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
Public Burden Statement

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a 

collection of information unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. Public 

reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 20.25 hours per 

response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering 

and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. 

The obligation to respond to this collection is required to obtain or retain benefit (Assistance 

under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act as amended by No Child Left Behind, Title 

VIII, Section 8003). Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this 

collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the U.S. Department 

of Education, 400 Maryland Ave., SW, Washington, DC 20210-4537 or email 

ICDocketMgr@ed.gov and reference the OMB Control Number 1810-0687. Note: Please do not 

return the completed Application for Section 8003 Assistance to this address.