alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31**

I, Ruairidh Campbell certify that: 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB (“Report”) of Montana Mining Corp.; 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report; 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the period presented in this Report; 

4.     I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: 

a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is being prepared; 

b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this Report based on such evaluation; and 

c)     Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

Date: May 11, 2007 

/s/ Ruairidh Campbell

Ruairidh Campbell 

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer 

**16**

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Patrick J. Kealy, Chief Executive Officer of Star Energy Corporation (the Company), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                    
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Patrick J. Kealy                                               
|                   |  |  |  | Patrick J. Kealy                                                   
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President (Principal
Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

Of Transportation 

January 20, 2015 

Ms. Lisa A. Harig 

Counsel for Compass Airlines, LLC 

McBreen & Kopko 

1501 Lee Highway, Suite 180 

Arlington, VA 22209 

Dear Ms. Harig: 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Thank you for promptly responding to our letter of January 8, 2015, pertaining to the 

request of Compass Airlines, LLC ("Compass") for confidential treatment of certain 

documents submitted to the Department in connection with the air carrier's request for 

amended authority. We have reviewed the submission and find that it does not fully 

respond to our January 8 letter with respect to Exhibit 2. Specifically, we only granted 

confidential treatment to the projected revenues and projected net income portions of the 

exhibit. We did not grant confidentiality to the air carrier's projected expenses. Thus, we 

ask that Compass provide us with a revised Exhibit 2. 

Also, since our last informal fitness review for Compass in 2011, we ask that the air 

carrier submit income statements for the 12-month periods ending September 30, 2012, 

and 2013. 

Lastly, Compass provided updated resumes for its key technical personnel and stated in 

its application that there have been no changes to its key management personnel since the 

air carrier's last fitness review. Considering that nearly three years have elapsed since 

our last review of the air carrier, please provide a list of Compass' key management 

personnel so that we are able to verify that we have reviewed each person's qualifications 

and compliance information. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free 

to contact me at 202-366-9721 or Vanessa.balgobin@dot.gov. 

Vanessa R. Balgobin 

Analyst, Air Carrier Fitness Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 
cc: Docket DOT-OST-2014-0178 

Mr. David J.A. Hayes III, Esq. 

Vice President & General Counsel 

Trans States Holdings, Inc. 

11495 Navaid Road 

Bridgeton, MO 63044 

2
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CalifAcquisitions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

August 3, 2006
Filed 12/5/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 227

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Marcus Benjamin Peltier, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160148

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Ryan A. Keefe, Assistant State’s Attorney, Burleigh County Courthouse, 514 E. Thayer Ave., Bismarck,  ND 58501, plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Thomas J. Glass, 418 E. Rosser Ave., Ste. 102, Bismarck, ND 58501; defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. Peltier

No. 20160148

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Marcus Peltier appeals a criminal judgment after a jury trial.  He argues the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a mistrial.  Peltier claims the State engaged in prosecutorial misconduct by using the word “felony” in its closing arguments.  The State argues it was not prejudicial to use the word “felony” in its closing arguments, because Peltier was charged with preventing arrest or discharge of other duties, and “felony” is an element of that crime.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4), concluding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Peltier’s motion for a mistrial.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
1


                                                             EXHIBIT 21




                  CONSOLIDATED FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION
                      SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                           December 31, 2001

 The subsidiaries of the Company were:

                                                         State or
                                             Percent of  Province or
                                             Stock Owned Country of
Subsidiaries                                 by Company  Incorporation

Consolidated Freightways
   Corporation of Delaware                      100      Delaware
   Canadian Freightways, Limited                100      Alberta, Canada
   Milne & Craighead, Inc.                      100      Alberta, Canada
   Canadian Freightways Eastern Limited         100      Ontario, Canada
   United Terminals Ltd.                        100      B.C., Canada
   Blackfoot Logistics Ltd.                     100      B.C., Canada
   Transport CFQI, Inc., d.b.a.
     Epic Express and Universal Contract
       Logistics                                100      Quebec, Canada
   Click Express Inc.                           100      Alberta, Canada
   Interport Sufferance Warehouses              100      Ontario, Canada
   Panorama Mainland Ltd.                       100      Alberta, Canada
   724567 Alberta Ltd.                          100      Alberta, Canada
   724569 Alberta Ltd. d.b.a. Evergreen
     Logistics                                  100      Alberta, Canada
   CF Funding LLC                               100      Delaware
   Consolidadora De Fletes Mexico S.A. de C.V.   99      Mexico, D.F.
   Transportes CF Dominican Republic             34      Dominican Republic
   Transportes CF Guatemala S.A.                 99.9    Guatemala
   Transportes CF Costa Rica S.A.               100      Costa Rica
Leland James Service Corporation                100      Delaware
Redwood Systems, Inc.                           100      Delaware
   Redwood Systems Logistics de Mexico          100      Mexico - Jalisco
   Redwood Systems Services de Mexico           100      Mexico - Jalisco
CF AirFreight Corporation                       100      Delaware
CF Risk Management                              100      Bermuda
Grupo Consolidated Freightways S.A. de C.V.     100      Mexico, D.F.
   CF Alfri-Loder, S. de R.L. de C.V.            50      Mexico - Nuevo Leon
   Transportes CF Alfri-Loder de R.L. De C.V.    49      Mexico - Nuevo Leon
CF MovesU.com Incorporated                      100      Delaware
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jose Hernandez a/k/a Jose Irriaza, * From the 35th District Court

of Brown County,

Trial Court No. CR22622.

Vs. No. 11-14-00314-CR * November 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

The
Board of Directors
Tumbleweed Communications Corp.:

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-84683, 333-43194, 333-48636 and 333-49492) on
Form S-8 of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. of our report dated January 24, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Tumbleweed Communications Corp.

/s/
KPMG LLP

Mountain
View, California
March 27, 2002

---

QuickLinks
---

---

Exhibit 15.3

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements (No. 333-119885, No. 333-101990 and No.
333-125064) on Form F-3 and Form S-8 of Top Image Systems Ltd. of our report dated April
1, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Asiasoft Global Pte. Ltd. as of
December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
shareholders equity, and cash flows for the six months then ended, which report
appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 20-F of Top Image Systems Ltd.

KPMG

Singapore
April 1, 2008



---

---

# Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Asiasoft Global Pte. Ltd.

We have audited the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet of Asiasoft Global Pte. Ltd. (the Company) and its
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the six months then
ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our
audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, as well as assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2007,
and the consolidated results of their operations and the changes in Shareholders
equity and cash flows for the six months then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.

KPMG

April 1, 2008
Singapore



---

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen

Kurtis T. Wilder,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 1 , 2017 

# Order

Clerk September 1 , 2017

15 6086 ( 63 )

RITA KENDZIERSKI, BONNIE HAINES,

GREG DENNIS, LOUISE BERTOLINI, JOHN

BARKER, JAMES COWAN, VINCENT

POWIERSKI, ROBERT STANLEY, ALAN

MOROSCHAN, and GAER GUERBER, on

Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly

Situated

, Plaintiff s

- Appellee s

, SC: 15 6086

v COA: 328929

Macomb CC: 2010

- 001380

- CK

MACOMB COUNTY

, Defendant

- Appellant.

__________________________________ ____ _

/

On order of the C hief Justice , the motion of the Public Corporation Law Section of

the State Bar of Michigan, the Michigan Municipal League, the Michigan Association of

Counties, and the Michigan Townships Association to f ile a brief amicus curiae in

support of the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted

on August 2 8 , 2017, is accepted for filing.
... REGISTER 

MEDIA 

A GANNETT COMPANY 

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION 

State of Iowa 

County of Polk, ss.: 

The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath, states that The Des Moines Register and Tribune Company, a 

corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Iowa, with its principal place of business in 

Des Moines, Iowa, the publisher of 

THE DES MOINES REGISTER 

newspaper of general circulation printed and published in the City of Des Moines, Polk County, Iowa, and that an 

advertisement, a printed copy of which is attached as Exhibit "A" and made part of this affidavit, was printed and published 

in The Des Moines Register on the following dates: 

Ad No. Start Date: 

0000695490 09/04/15 

Copy of Advertisement 

Exhibit "A" 

Run Dates: Cost: 

09/04/15, 09/21/15 $37.82 

Subscribed and sworn to before me by said affiant this 

22th day of September. 2015 

Qjc in and .for Polk County, Iowa 

~t-"''"t ~ ANDREA HOUGHTON 

{~ ..... • .r,C tOM.MISSION NO .. 7539.56 "'~ * COMMISSION EXPIRES .. 101'1" I c 1 LJ- '251 ?!>,-, 

u 
PUBLIC NOTICE 

Notice is hereby given that . on Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 9;30 

a.m. in Room 120 Polk County Administrative o{tlce building, 111 Court Avenues, Des Moines, Iowa, the Polk CountY Board of Supervisors acting In· its 

capacity as the Local Board of Health will hold a hearing on 

proposed amendments to Polk County Local Board of Health Rules and Regulations, Chapter V- Air Pollution. The proposed amendments are a routine 

update for consistency with 567 Iowa Administrative Code (lAC) references, definitions, procedures, standards and exemptions. The proposal amends the following sections; 5-1, 5-2, 5-16, 5-20, 5-33 and 5-39. The summary of proposed regulation amendments (Exhibit A) Is available on file in the 

Polk County Auditor's Office located at the Polk County Administration Building, 111 

Court Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa, Room 230. Anyone desiring to comment on the proposed amendments may appear and be heard. 

By: Jamie Fitzgerald Polk County Auditor
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

**SHEILA LLOYD - THE BENEFACTOR (A LIVING WOMAN),** 

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**PENNYMAC CORP. ET AL; PHELAN, HALLINAN, DIAMOND & JONES, ET AL.,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 83 EM 2016** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 22nd day of July, 2016, the Application for Ext raordinary and** 

**King’s Bench Jurisdiction is** DENIED

**.**

**Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration o r decision of this matter.**
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-69,251-10

EX PARTE TORY GRAY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. W03-74017-H(H) 

IN THE CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 

OF DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of capital murder

and sentenced to life imprisonment.

In his present application,Applicant raises two grounds. This application, however, presents

a more serious question. This Court’s records reflect that Applicant has filed six prior applications

pertaining to this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues

that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented
2

in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders

v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his 

repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant’s claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4,

and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.

Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Abel Acosta, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals,

not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application

pertaining to this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims

presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous

application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

Copies of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Filed: December 7, 2016

Do not publish