alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Opinion issued September 10, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-19-00430-CV

———————————

BRANDI HAGGERTON, Appellant

V.

DANNY LE, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Bell County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 88872

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, Brandi Haggerton, has failed to timely file a brief. Appellant’s 

brief was due by July 31, 2019. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file 

appellant’s brief). On August 15, 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant 

that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution, unless she filed a 
2

brief or a motion for an extension of time to file a brief by August 26, 2019. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief), 42.3(b) 

(allowing involuntary dismissal of case). To date, appellant has not filed a brief or 

a motion for an extension of time.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of Lighthouse Landings, Inc. and Subsidiaries as at and for
the years ended December 31, 1999 is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          95,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     40,948
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               299,481
<PP&E>                                      13,445,131
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,156,251
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,753,060
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,471,675
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,058
<OTHER-SE>                                     168,217
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,753,060
<SALES>                                      3,285,978
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,285,978
<CGS>                                        2,493,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,797,901
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,473,735
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,975,910)
<DISCONTINUED>                               (547,001)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,522,911)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.70)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99

                                Certification
                                     of
 Accessory Specialists Incorporated pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
 Oxley Act of 2002 regarding Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
                             ended June 30, 2002


     Pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a)  and  (b)  of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States  Code),
each  of  the  undersigned officers of Accessory Specialists Incorporated,  a
Nevada corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

     1.  The  Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended
         June   30,  2002  (the  "Form  10-QSB")  fully  complies  with   the
         requirements  of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
         Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2.  Information  contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly  presents,  in  all
         material   respects,  the  financial  condition   and   results   of
         operations of the Company.



     Dated:   August 12, 2002          /s/ Anthony N. DeMint
                                        Anthony N. DeMint
                                       President/ Chief Accounting Officer
DFW Area Fourth Highest 8-hour Ozone Concentrations and Design Values (ppm),1

 2011-2013 

Site 

Name and Number

4th Highest Daily Max Design Value 

(2011-2013)

2011 2012 2013 

Fort Worth Northwest 

48-439-1002 

0.082 0.077 0.084 0.081 

Keller 

48-439-2003 

0.097 0.079 0.080 0.085 

Frisco 

48-085-0005 

0.091 0.084 0.078 0.084 

Midlothian OFW 

48-139-0016 

0.080 0.078 0.075 0.077 

Denton Airport South 

48-121-0034 

0.095 0.081 0.085 0.087 

Arlington Municipal Airport 

48-439-3011 

0.080 0.092 0.068 0.080 

Dallas North No. 2 

48-113-0075 

0.088 0.086 0.077 0.083 

Rockwall Heath 

48-397-0001 

0.080 0.080 0.073 0.077 

Grapevine Fairway 

48-439-3009 

0.091 0.086 0.083 0.086 

Kaufman 

48-257-0005 

0.074 0.073 0.075 0.074 

Eagle Mountain Lake 

48-439-0075 

0.080 0.087 0.077 0.081 

Parker County 

48-367-0081 

0.088 0.076 0.074 0.079 

Cleburne Airport 

48-251-0003 

0.079 0.082 0.077 0.079 

Dallas Hinton St. 

48-113-0069 

0.084 0.087 0.081 0.084 

Dallas Executive Airport 

48-113-0087 

0.082 0.085 0.074 0.080 

Pilot Point 

48-121-1032 

0.091 0.078 0.084 0.084 

Italy 

48-139-1044 

0.075 0.071 0.072 0.072 

 

1

 Design value calculations for the 1997 ozone standard are based on a rolling three-year average of the annual 4th 

highest values (40 CFR Part 50, Appendix I).
# C_2016281EN.01000301.xml

| 3.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8032 — RAM/Termica Milazzo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 281/05)

On 26 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the Italian language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8032. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8032. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Acrongenomics Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Platon Tzouvalis hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|August 18, 2008 |                              
|--------------- | -----------------------------
|                |                              
|                | /s/ Platon Tzouvalis         
|                | Platon Tzouvalis             
|                | President                    
|                | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Acrongenomics Inc. and will be retained by
Acrongenomics Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 4.1


		 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARPAI, INC. Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share CUSIP :571354109 This is to certify that is the registered holder of fully paid and non-assessable shares of Class A Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, of Marpai, Inc., hereinafter designated the “Corporation”, transferable only on the books of the Corporation in person or by a duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate, properly endorsed.. This certificate and the shares represented thereby are subject to the provisions of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation (both as may be amended from time to time), a copy of each of which is on file at the office of the Corporation. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the transfer agent and registered by the registrar. WITNESS THE SEAL OF THE CORPORATION AND THE SIGNATURES OF ITS DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICERS, DATED: /s/ Chief Executive Officer/s/ Secretary 236 420-100 01 







    


     


    

 


		 For value received,hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated:20Signature: Signature(s) Guaranteed: BY: THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions) WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE MEDALLION PROGRAM, PURSUANT TO S.E.C RULE 17Ad-15. Signature: Notice: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER 21336629.2 236420-10001
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06825]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD850


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Habitat Committee to consider 
actions affecting New England fisheries in the exclusive economic zone 
(EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be brought to the full 
Council for formal consideration and action, if appropriate.

DATES: This meeting will be held on Thursday, April 9, 2015 at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: 
    Meeting address: The meeting will be held at the Radisson Airport 
Hotel, 2081 Post Road, Warwick, RI 02886; telephone: (401) 739-3000; 
fax: (401) 732-9309.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Habitat committee's goal is to continue 
development of Omnibus Essential Fish Habitat Amendment 2 and finalize 
preferred alternative recommendations for the full Council. They will 
discuss other business as necessary.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before these groups for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meetings. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, provided the public has 
been notified of the Council's intent to take final action to address 
the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Thomas A. Nies, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 20, 2015.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-06825 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-16-00109-CV 

Thomas Florence 

v. 

Martinay Davenport III; James 

Stivers, Grievance Investigator; 

James Anders, Assistant Warden; 

Mark Roth, Step II Grievance 

Investigator; TDCJ-CID 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From the 78th District Court 

of Wichita County (183,643-B) 

December 1, 2016 

Opinion by Justice Dauphinot 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s order. It is ordered that the order of the trial 

court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Lee Ann Dauphinot_____________ 

 Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot
Exhibit 32.1

                              STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Darryl Cohen,  Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of Ocean
West Holding Corporation (the "Company"),  hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(a)   the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended
      March 31, 2006, to which this  certification  accompanies  (the  "Periodic
      Report"),  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   the information  contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents,  in all
      material  respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

Dated: May 22, 2006


                                        /s/ Darryl Cohen
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Darryl Cohen,
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chief Financial Officer

      A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section  906,  has been  provided  to Ocean West  Holding
Corporation and will be retained by Ocean West Holding Corporation and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 20, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-50549 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus THURMAN D. PAYNE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-899-3

-------------------- Before JONES, WIENER, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Thurman D. Payne has moved for leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief pursuant
to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Payne has filed a response to the motion, contending that the district court’s determination of drug quantity was arbitrary, that he should have been granted an offense-level reduction as a minimal participant, that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at sentencing, and that his counsel had a conflict of interest.No. 02-50549 -2- Payne moves for leave to file supplements to his Anders response, in which he asserts additional sentencing and counsel-conflict issues; those motions are GRANTED. Our independent review of the brief, the record, and Payne’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Payne waived the right to appeal his sentence except upon limited grounds. The sentencing issues he asserts are waived. See United States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 567 (5th Cir. 1992). Although Payne’s appeal waiver excepted his claims pertaining toineffective assistance of counsel, including his conflict-ofinterest claim, we decline to address those issues on direct appeal, without prejudice to Payne’s right to assert such claims in a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Massaro v. United
States , ___ U.S. ___, 123 S. Ct. 1690, 1694 (2003); see also United States v. Bounds , 943 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH C IR . R. 42.2.
#### Bowen vs. Malbon.

1. An order granting a new trial upon the ground of iucompotency of a juror, will not be reversed although the juror was competent, if the motion was heard, in part, upon “minutes of the judge,” and the “minutes” are not made part of the record.

2. In such case the court will presume that the new trial was properly allowed. So held where several grounds for a new trial were assigned in the motion.

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for *Winnebago*County.

Replevin. Verdict for plaintiff. Tbe defendant moved on *“*tbe minutes of the judge and all tbe papers in tbe cause,” and certain affidavits, for anew trial, because of misdirection of tbe judge, newly discovered evidence, incompetency of one of tbe jurors and other reasons. Tbe court granted a new trial on tbe ground, as stated in tbe order, that one of tbe jurors was disqualified to act by reason of consanguinity with one Buck-staff, who is alleged in tbe answer to be tbe real party in interest in maintaining tbe action.

No case was settled, and tbe “minutes of tbe judge” were not made part of tbe record.

*Whittemore é Weisbrocl,*for appellant.

*H. B. Jaclcson,*for respondent.

*492Cole, J.

It appears that the motion for a new trial was heard upon the “ minutes of the judge,” as well as upon the affidavits returned on this appeal. Those “ minutes” are not before us, as they should be, in order to enable us to say that the new trial was improperly granted. We must presume, in the absence of these minutes, that a new trial was properly allowed, and that the circuit court decided rightfully upon the matters before it. It is true, the order granting a new trial recites, as a reason for granting it, that it appeared to the court that McCurdy was disqualified to act as a juror on account of existing consanguinity with Buckstaff. Now it is contended that the affidavits show most conclusively that no consanguinity existed between those persons. Grant that this is so, and yet how can we assume that if the whole case were before us upon which the circuit court acted, it would appear that a new trial ought not to be granted upon some other ground ? Obviously we cannot. We must assume that the matters contained in the minutes amply justified the order granted.

*By the Court.*— The order is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07338]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute on Aging; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis 
Panel; Fibroblast Growth Factor And Aging.
    Date: May 1, 2015.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 
2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone 
Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Alicja L. Markowska, Ph.D., DSC., Scientific 
Review Branch, National Institute On Aging, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, 
Suite 2c212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-9666, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging 
Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 26, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-07338 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```