alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-15-011]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# TIME AND DATE:

April 3, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

# PLACE:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS: 

Open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. No. 731-TA-1269 (Preliminary) (Silicomanganese from Australia). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determination on April 6, 2015; views of       ( print page 16697)    the Commission are currently scheduled to be completed and filed on April 13, 2015.

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

Dated: Issued: March 25, 2015.

By order of the Commission.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-07282 Filed 3-26-15; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7258

WESLEY CHASE,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Intervenor/Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden of the Powhatan Correctional Center, he is sued in his personal and official capacities; PARKER, Ms., Principal of the Powhatan Correctional Center, she is sued in her perso nal and official capacities; P. M. HENICK, Regional Ombudsman, Virginia Department of Corrections, he or she is sued within he or she personal and official capacities; S. TRIMMER, Ms., Special Education, director for the Virginia Department of Education, she is sued in her personal and official capacities,

Defendants – Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District Judge. (3:04-cv-759-HEH)

Submitted: November 25, 2008 Decided: December 31, 2008

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Mark R. Davis, Assistant Attorney General, William Eugene Thro, Special Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellants. Wesley Chase, Appellee Pro Se. Sarah Elaine Harrington, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Robert P. McIntosh, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for the United States.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

23 PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying

their motion to dismiss Appellee’s Rehabilitation Act claims on

the basis of sovereign immunity. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Chase v. Baskerville , No.

3:04-cv-759-HEH (E.D. Va. Aug. 2, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capella Education Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
J. Kevin Gilligan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ J. Kevin Gilligan  
|J. Kevin Gilligan      
|Chief Executive Officer
|April 30, 2009         

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 7135

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
WILLIAM TURNER SMITH , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:07

- cr - 00011

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : February 4, 2022 Decided: February 9, 2022

Before WILKINSON and KING , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

William Turner Smith , Appellant Pro Se. David A. Bragdon, Assistant United States Attorney, Kristine L. Fritz, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer P. May

- Parker , Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
William Turner Smith appeals the district court’s or der granting his motion for a sentence reduction in part . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Smith , No. 5:07

- cr - 00011

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C. July 28, 202 1 ) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the Special Medical Advisory Group (Group) will meet on May 13, 2015, in Room 830 at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 a.m. to 3:45 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of disabled Veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Department's Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

The agenda for the meeting will include clarification of the roles and expectations for the reconstituted Group, the current state of the VA presented by the Interim Under Secretary of Health, discussion regarding various options/enhancements available to VA to provide quality care and access to Veterans, and a discussion regarding the Interagency Collaborations between Department of Defense and VA to provide quality care and access for transitioning Servicemembers/Veterans.

                    There will be time for public comment from 3:00 p.m. until 3:30 p.m.; however, members of the public may also submit written statements for review by the Group to Barbara Hyduke, Designated Federal Officer, Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Patient Care Services (10P4), Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, or by email at                     *Barbara.Hyduke@va.gov.*                     Because the meeting is being held in a government building, a photo I.D. must be presented at the Guard's Desk as a part of the clearance process; therefore, you should allow an additional 15 minutes before the meeting begins for a security check. Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting or seeking additional information should contact Ms. Hyduke at (202) 461-7800 or by email.                

Dated: March 23, 2015.

Rebecca Schiller,

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-07021 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
# C_2016185EN.01000101.xml

| 24.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7992 — Starwood Capital Group/Banco Sabadell/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 185/01)

On 17 May 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7992. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7992. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 99.2


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ENACTED UNDER
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Domenic N. Golato, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION] 1350, as
enacted under [SECTION] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company as of March 31, 2003 (the end of the period covered by the Report).

Date:  May 8, 2003

                                       /s/ Domenic N. Golato
                                       ---------------------
                                           Domenic N. Golato

                                       Senior Vice President & Chief
                                        Financial Officer


<PAGE>
T. L-G., Mother of Z. L., Minor 

Child,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN 

AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4064

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 1, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

David M. Gooding, Judge.

Jeffrey Lewis, General Counsel, and Joshua Goldsborough, Assistant Regional 

Conflict Counsel, Office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Region 

One, Jacksonville; Crystal McBee Frusciante, Sunrise, for Appellant.

Ward L. Metzger, Appellate Counsel, Department of Children and Families, 

Jacksonville, for Appellee; David P. Krupski, Appellate Counsel, Guardian ad 

Litem Program, Sanford.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-15667

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:15-cr-00038-WTH-PRL-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANDREW JOHN EVANS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Florida

________________________

(November 30, 2016)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, HULL and WILSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 15-15667 Date Filed: 11/30/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

John E. Fernandez, appointed counsel for Andrew Evans in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel=s assessment of 

the relative merit of Evans’s appeal is correct. Because independent examination 

of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel=s motion to 

withdraw is GRANTED, and Evans’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 15-15667 Date Filed: 11/30/2016 Page: 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ERIC X. RAMBERT,

 Appellant

v.

BOARD OR PROBATION AND PAROLE, 

JOHN DEITRICT, CORRECTIONS 

COUNSELOR, CARRINGTON, PAROLE 

AGENT SUPERVISOR, JOHN/JANE 

DOE, RECORDS SUPERVISOR, JOHN 

E. WETZEL, SECRETARY,

 Appellees 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 30 WAP 2016

Notice of Appeal and Jurisdictional 

Statement

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2

nd day of December, 2016, the Notice of Appeal is Quashed.
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40498

MICHAEL A. CAMPBELL, Individually and on behalf of other similarly situated former policyholders of John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN HANCOCK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; ET AL., Defendants, JOHN HANCOCK FINANC IAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED; JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSUR ANCE COMPANY; JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL, JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana

(5:01-CV-48)

-------------------- February 13, 2003
Before JONES, WIENER, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: 1 AFFIRMED. See Rule 47.6.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EYI Industries,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-2 for the quarter ended June 30th,
  2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
  (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated
  below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.        The Report fully
  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
  Act of 1934; and

2.        The information
  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operation of the Company.

|Date:            October 7
      th, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Rajesh Raniga      
|----------------------------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                                          | Name:  | Rajesh Raniga          
|                                          | Title: | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
  the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
  written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to EYI Industries,
  Inc. and will be retained by EYI Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
<PAGE>

                         CONSENT OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2


McGowan
Gunterman    TM
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS AND CONSULTANTS


INDEPENDENT  AUDITOR'S  CONSENT


Board  of  Directors  and  Shareholders
Turbodyne  Technologies,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries
Carpinteria,  California

We  consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
43852)  on  Form  S-8  of  Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our
report  dated  April  6,  2001  relating  to  the consolidated balance sheets of
Turbodyne  Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 1999,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash  flows  for  the years then ended, which report appears in the December 31,
2000  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  of  Turbodyne  Technologies,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries.

Our  report,  dated April 6, 2001, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that  the  Company  has  suffered  net losses in each of the last five years, is
subject  to  numerous  lawsuits,  including  those  brought  against  it  by
shareholders,  and  based  on  projected  cash  flows  for  the ensuing year the
Company  will  require  additional equity or debt financing in order to continue
its  present  operations.  These  matters  raise  substantial  doubt  about  the
Company's  ability  to  continue as a going concern.  The consolidated financial
statements  do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
these  uncertainties.


/s/ McGowan  Guntermann

McGOWAN  GUNTERMANN

Santa  Barbara,  California
April  17,  2001
#### Hull vs. The State.

*Evidence*— Rape—Consent.

Proof of the woman's consent (not produced by fear) is always fatal to a charge of an assault with intent to commit a rape.- -

ERROR to the Circuit Court for *Monroe*County.

*Montgomery, Tyler $• Dickinson,*for plaintiff in error.

*The Attorney General,*for the state.

Dixon, C. J.

This was an indictment against the plaintiff in error for assault with intent to commit the crime of rape. The testimony was very voluminous, and the charge of the court long; hut it is unnecessary to notice either, except as to the single question on which the case is here decided.

The judge, among other things, instructed the jury that much had been said on the question whether the prosecu-trix consented or not; that for the purpose of the case it was immaterial whether she did actually consent or not; and that the evidence upon that point was only relevant in so far as it tended to show what the intention of the accused was. It is sufficient to observe that the consent here spoken of is not that yielding through force or fear which, when *581the ravisher accomplishes his purpose, still constitutes the crime of rape, but the voluntary consent of the prosecutrix. The instruction was obviously erroneous. It was not immaterial whether the prosecutrix voluntarily consented or not; for if she did, and the jury had so found, the accused was not guilty of the offense charged. He was not, in the language of the indictment, guilty of an assault upon her with intent carnally to know and ravish her by force and *against her will,*which is of the essence of the offense complained of.

*By the Court.*— Exception sustained, and cause remanded with directions that the motion for a new trial he granted.
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

## CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consentto the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3****(No. 333-105414and No. 333-111270) and Form S-8 (No. 333-22217, No. 333-41754, No. 333-53380, No.333-75060 and No. 333-111275) of Overland Storage, Inc. of our report datedSeptember 1, 2004 relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedule, which appear in this Form 10-K.

 

 
|                  | /s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |   |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------|--------|
|                  |
| San Diego, California |
| September  10, 2004   |

 

----
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

 

**Section      1350Certificate of Chief Executive Officer**

                     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summus, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form      10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary E. Ban, the Chief      Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,      that:

                     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15      (d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                     2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the      Company.

 

 

| Date:                    August 12, 2005 | /s/              Gary E.              Ban                                                 Gary E. BanChief Executive              Officer |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|