alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v William Robinson, Also Known as Duane Winston, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 716]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered March 30, 2000, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance *611in the seventh degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing (Rotker, J.), of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress his statement to law enforcement officials.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his statement to the police was spontaneous and not the result of the functional equivalent of interrogation *(see People v Stockdale,*270 AD2d 294 [2000]; *People v Little,*204 AD2d 351 [1994]; *People v Hawthorne,*145 AD2d 569 [1988]). Therefore, the hearing court properly declined to suppress the statement.

The defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, is primarily based on matter dehors the record which cannot be reviewed on direct appeal *(see People v Zimmerman,*309 AD2d 824 [2003], *lv denied*1 NY3d 603 [2004]; *People v Wingate,*297 AD2d 761 [2002]). However, to the extent that such claim is reviewable, the record demonstrates that the defendant received meaningful representation *(see People v Baldi,*54 NY2d 137, 147 [1981]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Ritter, J.P., H. Miller, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 281 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for Disease Control 

and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety 

or gun violence prevention. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2021 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. SCHATZ, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. CARPER, Mr. 

COONS, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. CASEY, Mr. BROWN, Ms. WARREN, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. DURBIN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. KING, Ms. ROSEN, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. MERKLEY, Mr. 

REED, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. MENENDEZ, Ms. BALDWIN, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, 

Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. SMITH, Mr. 

CARDIN, Mr. WARNER, Mr. BENNET, Mr. KAINE, Mr. LEAHY, Mrs. 

GILLIBRAND, Mr. WYDEN, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. HEINRICH, and Mr. 

PETERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To authorize the appropriation of funds to the Centers for 

Disease Control and Prevention for conducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun violence prevention. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 281 IS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gun Violence Preven3 tion Research Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR RESEARCH BY CDC ON FIREARMS 

5 SAFETY OR GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION. 

6 There is authorized to be appropriated to the Centers 

7 for Disease Control and Prevention $50,000,000 for each 

8 of fiscal years 2022 through 2027 for the purpose of con9 ducting or supporting research on firearms safety or gun 

10 violence prevention under the Public Health Service Act 

11 (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.). The amount authorized to be ap12 propriated by the preceding sentence is in addition to any 

13 other amounts authorized to be appropriated for such pur14 pose. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### J. W. Byers v. E. A. Humphrey.

I. *Practice—On Appeals from*Justices.—Where an appeal from a justice is taken by filing a bond in the court to which the appeal is taken, such court is without jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal or to make any order in the case adversely to either party, without his consent, until the appellee has been summoned or entered his appearance ten days before the commencement of the term at which such action is had.

Assumpsit.—Error to the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Jonas Hutchinson, Judge, presiding.

Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1900.

Reversed and remanded.

Opinion filed July 23, 1901.

J. M. H. Burgett, attorney for plaintiff in error.

No appearance by defendant in error.

Mr. Presiding Justice Shepard

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error recovered a judgment against the plaintiff in error in a suit before a justice of the peace. The plaintiff in error took an appeal to the Superior Court, and at the same time of filing his appeal bond, the justice’s transcript was filed. A supersedeas thereupon was issued on the same day, and was served, the day following, on the justice.

At a subsequent term the case was called in the Superior Court, and in the absence of the plaintiff in error, on the motion of the defendant in error, the appeal was dismissed at the costs of the plaintiff in error. The defendant in error had never been summoned, and had not entered his appearance in the Superior Court until the making of such motion.

The court was without jurisdiction to dismiss the appeal or make any order in the" case adversely to either party, without his consent, until the defendant in error had been summoned or entered bis appearance ten days before the commencement of the term at which the order was entered. *203Bridge and Structural Iron Workers’ Union v. Sigmund, 88 Ill. App. 344.

The judgment that was rendered dismissing the appeal was void for want of jurisdiction in the Superior Court to render it, and it is reversed and the cause remanded.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00054-CV

____________________

JEFFREY D. WESTBROOK, Appellant

V.

DAVID A. DOUGHTY, FRANKIE L. RESCANO, SANDRA R. JOHNSON 

AND ANITA R. BREAUX, Appellees

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 129046

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Jeffrey D. Westbrook appealed from a judgment signed January 8, 2018. On

May 29, 2018, we notified the parties that the clerk’s record had not been filed due 

to the appellant’s failure to pay or, to arrange to pay the District Clerk’s fee for 

preparing the clerk’s record. Further, the notice warned Westbrook that the appeal 

would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless a response was filed by June 28, 

2018. Westbrook filed a response on June 11, 2018. 
2

The trial court denied Westbrook’s claim of indigence on January 10, 2017, 

approximately one year before the trial court signed the order that is the subject of 

this appeal. Westbrook did not challenge the order within ten days of the date it was 

signed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(g)(2). The clerk responsible for preparing the record 

in this appeal informed the Court that Westbrook did not arrange to pay for the 

record. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a).

There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to file the clerk’s 

record, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); 

see also Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

 

Submitted on June 27, 2018

Opinion Delivered June 28, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
```

[Federal Register: April 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 83)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 22699]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30ap10-6]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 98

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0508; FRL-9143-5]
RIN 2060-AQ15

 
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases: Minor Harmonizing 
Changes to the General Provisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Because EPA received comments which could be construed as 
adverse, we are withdrawing the direct final rule to amend the general 
provisions for the Mandatory Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Reporting Rule, 
published on March 16, 2010.

DATES: Effective April 30, 2010, EPA withdraws the direct final rule 
published at 75 FR 12451 on March 16, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carole Cook, Climate Change Division, 
Office of Atmospheric Programs (MC-6207J), Environmental Protection 
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone 
number: (202) 343-9263; fax number: (202) 343-2342; e-mail address: 
GHGReportingRule@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 16, 2010, we published a direct 
final rule (75 FR 12451) and a parallel proposal (75 FR 12489) amending 
the general provisions for the GHG Reporting Rule. These amendments 
were issued as a direct final rule, along with a parallel proposal to 
be used as the basis for final action in the event EPA received any 
adverse comments on the direct final amendments. Because EPA received 
comments which could be construed as adverse, we are withdrawing the 
direct final rule to amend the general provisions for the Mandatory GHG 
Reporting Rule, published on March 16, 2010. We stated in that direct 
final rule that if we received adverse comment by April 15, 2010, the 
direct final rule would not take effect and we would publish a timely 
withdrawal in the Federal Register. We subsequently received comments 
that could be construed as adverse on that direct final rule. We will 
address those comments in a subsequent final action based on the 
parallel proposal published on March 16, 2010 (75 FR 12489). As stated 
in the direct final rule and the parallel proposed rule, we will not 
institute a second comment period on this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 98

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, 
Greenhouse gases, Suppliers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: April 23, 2010.
Gina McCarthy,
Assistant Administrator for Office of Air and Radiation.

0
Accordingly, the amendments to the rule published in the Federal 
Register on March 16, 2010 (75 FR 12451) are withdrawn as of April 30, 
2010.

[FR Doc. 2010-10147 Filed 4-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________

No. 21-1937

________________

JOSEPH LAPORTE,

 Appellant

v.

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; POLICE OFFICER KEENAN; 

OFFICER BUTLER

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

(D.C. Civil No. 2-20-cv-03920)

________________

ORDER AMENDING 

________________

The opinion and judgment entered on April 21, 2023 erroneously identified the 

Honorable Gene E.K. Pratter as the District Court judge. An amended opinion and 

judgment shall be entered listing the Honorable Gerald J. Pappert as the lower court 

judge. As this correction is not substantive in nature, the filing dates for the opinion and 

judgment will not be altered.

For the Court,

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

Date: April 26, 2023

Tmm/cc: Adrian R. Reid, Esq.

Meghan Byrnes, Esq.

Jane L. Istvan, Esq.
Rule 3.5 Impartiality and Decorum of the Tribunal

A lawyer shall not:

(a) seek to influence a judge, juror, prospective juror or other official by 

means prohibited by law;

(b) communicate ex parte with such a person during the proceeding unless 

authorized to do so by law or court order;

(c) communicate with a juror or prospective juror after discharge of the jury if:

 (1) the communication is prohibited by law or court order;

 (2) the juror has made known to the lawyer a desire not to 

communicate; or

 (3) the communication involves misrepresentation, coercion, duress 

[of] or harassment; or

(d) engage in conduct intended to disrupt a tribunal.

Comment:

[1] Many forms of improper influence upon a tribunal are proscribed by 

criminal law. Others are specified in the [ABA Model] Code of Judicial Conduct and/or 

the Rules Governing Standards of Conduct for Magisterial District Judges, with 

which an advocate should be familiar. A lawyer is required to avoid contributing to a 

violation of such provisions.

* * *

Rule 8.2 Statements Concerning Judges and Other Adjudicatory Officers

(a) A lawyer shall not make a statement that the lawyer knows to be false or 

with reckless disregard as to its truth or falsity concerning the qualifications or integrity 

of a judge, adjudicatory officer or public legal officer, or of a candidate for election or 

appointment to judicial or legal office.

(b) A lawyer who is a candidate for judicial office shall comply with the 

applicable provisions of the Code of Judicial Conduct and/or the Rules Governing 

Standards of Conduct for Magisterial District Judges, as applicable.

* * *
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, March 26, 2015 at 2 p.m.

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.

Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session, and determined that no earlier notice thereof was possible.

The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Adjudicatory matter; and

Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting items.

For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: March 19, 2015.

Brent J. Fields,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-06720 Filed 3-20-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# C_2016141EN.01000201.xml

| 22.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 April 2016

(2016/C 141/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1355 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4411 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78693 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1845 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0989 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2015 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,024 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,70 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3085 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4815 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1962 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4496 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4346 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8088 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6262 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5252 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 286,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0999 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3525 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4870 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 903,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4105 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,822 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,8545 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,743 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0043 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6232 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,2595 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1355

JPY

Japanese yen

124,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4411

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78693

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1845

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0989

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2015

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,024

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,70

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3085

RON

Romanian leu

4,4815

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1962

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4496

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4346

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8088

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6262

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5252

KRW

South Korean won

1 286,36

ZAR

South African rand

16,0999

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3525

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4870

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 903,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4105

PHP

Philippine peso

52,822

RUB

Russian rouble

73,8545

THB

Thai baht

39,743

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0043

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6232

INR

Indian rupee

75,2595

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**YESHTILA AWOKE AMESHE,**

**Petitioner**

**v.**

**HON. WILLIAM J. FURBER, JR.,**
**PRESIDENT JUDGE,**

**Respondent :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 138 MM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 29th day of October, 2015, the Application for Leave to File** 

**Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are**  GRANTED **. The Court of**

**Common Pleas of Montgomery County is** DIRECTED **to adjudicate Petitioner’s pending**

**filing within 90 days. The Prothonotary is** DIRECTED **to strike the name of the jurist**

**from the caption.**
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15604]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06802]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Election Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday March 17, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. and Its 
Continuation on Thursday March 19, 2015 at the Conclusion of the Open 
Meeting.

PLACE: 999 E Street NW., Washington, DC.

STATUS: This Meeting Will Be Closed To The Public.

Federal Register Notice of Previous Announcement--80 FR 13376

THIS ITEM WAS ALSO DISCUSSED: Internal personnel rules and internal 
rules and practices.

CHANGE IN THE MEETING: This meeting will be continued at a future date.
* * * * *

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Judith Ingram, Press Officer, 
Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

Shawn Woodhead Werth,
Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-06802 Filed 3-20-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
```

[Federal Register: October 26, 2011 (Volume 76, Number 207)]
[Rules and Regulations]               
[Page 66181]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26oc11-4]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Bureau of Industry and Security

15 CFR Part 774

 
The Commerce Control List

CFR Correction

    In Title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 300-799, 
revised as of January 1, 2011, in Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, in ECCN 
2B008, the ``Items'' paragraph on page 719 is revised to read as 
follows:

Supplement No. 1 to PART 774--THE COMMERCE CONTROL LIST

* * * * *
2B008 Assemblies or Units, Specially Designed for Machine Tools, or 
Dimensional Inspection or Measuring Systems and Equipment, as Follows 
(See List of Items Controlled).
* * * * *
    Items:
    a. Linear position feedback units (e.g., inductive type devices, 
graduated scales, infrared systems or ``laser'' systems) having an 
overall ``accuracy'' less (better) than (800 + (600 x L x 
10-3)) nm (L equals the effective length in mm);
    N.B.: For ``laser'' systems see also 2B006.b.1.c and d.
    b. Rotary position feedback units (e.g., inductive type devices, 
graduated scales, infrared systems or ``laser'' systems) having an 
``accuracy'' less (better) than 0.00025[deg];
    N.B.: For ``laser'' systems see also 2B006.b.2.
    c. ``Compound rotary tables'' and ``tilting spindles'', capable of 
upgrading, according to the manufacturer's specifications, machine 
tools to or above the levels controlled by 2B001 to 2B009.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-27753 Filed 10-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. (Tumbleweed) on Form 10-K
for the year ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), James P. Scullion, as Chief Executive Officer of Tumbleweed, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of Tumbleweed.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 17, 2008



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/S/    JAMES P.
SCULLION            
|James P. Scullion                   
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer