alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016146EN.01001401.xml

| 26.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/14

---

Call for proposals 2016 — EAC/A04/2015 — Erasmus+ Programme:

Change of deadline for the submission of applications in the field of youth in Greece

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 347 of 20 October 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 347 of 20 October 2015

(2016/C 146/13)

Point 5 ‘Deadline for the submission of applications’ has been amended as follows, as regards the deadline of 26 April 2016 in Greece for the field of youth:

| Key Action 1 |
| --- |
| Mobility of individuals in the field of youth | 31 May 2016 |
| Key Action 2 |
| Strategic partnerships in the field of youth | 31 May 2016 |
| Key Action 3 |
| Meeting between young people and decision-makers in the field of youth | 31 May 2016 |

Key Action 1

Key Action 1

Mobility of individuals in the field of youth

31 May 2016

Key Action 2

Key Action 2

Strategic partnerships in the field of youth

31 May 2016

Key Action 3

Key Action 3

Meeting between young people and decision-makers in the field of youth

31 May 2016

These amended deadlines apply to applications submitted in Greece only.

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2948 

To protect the right of individuals to bear arms at water resources 

development projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 6, 2021 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. RISCH, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. 

BRAUN, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. ROUNDS, and 

Ms. LUMMIS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To protect the right of individuals to bear arms at water 

resources development projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Recreational Lands 

5 Self Defense Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2948 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROTECTING THE RIGHT OF INDIVIDUALS TO BEAR 

2 ARMS AT WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT 

3 PROJECTS. 

4 The Secretary of the Army shall not promulgate or 

5 enforce any regulation that prohibits an individual from 

6 possessing a firearm, including an assembled or functional 

7 firearm, in any area open to the public (other than a Fed8 eral facility as defined in section 930(g) of title 18, United 

9 States Code) at a water resources development project 

10 covered under section 327.0 of title 36, Code of Federal 

11 Regulations (as in effect on the date of enactment of this 

12 Act), if— 

13 (1) the individual is not otherwise prohibited by 

14 law from possessing the firearm; and 

15 (2) the possession of the firearm is in compli16 ance with the law of the State in which the water 

17 resources development project is located. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2016049EN.01000102.xml

| 9.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7827 — Berkshire Hathaway/Precision Castparts)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 49/02)

On 5 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7827. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7827. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 14

- 00475

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.M.B. , Jr., Child

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 00828

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Ju dge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 6, 2014

DIS MISSED

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee, which has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM
# C_2016291EN.01000301.xml

| 11.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 291/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 291/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 August 2016

(2016/C 291/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1184 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4384 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85541 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4811 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0923 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2571 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,025 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,41 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2684 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4585 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3030 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4450 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4557 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6748 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5418 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4968 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 223,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8482 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4169 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4827 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 627,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4624 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,130 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,0826 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,859 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4911 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4917 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,5310 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1184

JPY

Japanese yen

113,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4384

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85541

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4811

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0923

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2571

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,025

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,41

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2684

RON

Romanian leu

4,4585

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3030

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4450

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4557

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6748

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5418

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4968

KRW

South Korean won

1 223,53

ZAR

South African rand

14,8482

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4169

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4827

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 627,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4624

PHP

Philippine peso

52,130

RUB

Russian rouble

72,0826

THB

Thai baht

38,859

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4911

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4917

INR

Indian rupee

74,5310

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-41018 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee

v. JOSHUA CALHOUN, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:09-CR-1159-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Joshua Calhoun appeals from his r esentencing following his guilty plea conviction of high speed flight from an immigratio n ch e ckpoint. As a special condition of s u p e rvised release, the district court, in its written judgment, ordered Calhoun to participate in “anger m a n a ge m e nt counseling as deemed necessary and approved by the probation officer.” When imposing the sentence orally, the district court merely stated that Calhoun would be s ubject to U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f Ap p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June7, 201 2 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat thisop inion sho uld not * be publish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d circum st ance s se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-41018 Document: 00511879306 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2012No. 11-41018

conditions of supervision including “anger management” and said nothing about the probation officer’s role. Calhoun argues that the distric t c o urt impermissibly delegated to the probation officer its Article III judicial function to determine whether he would have to participate in anger manage m e nt counseling; alternatively, he argues that the sentence must be vacated and remanded because the district court was unclear whether it intended to delegate to the probation officer the authority to d e c i d e whether Calhoun would have to participate in anger management counseling or whether the district court merely intended for the probation officer to implement anger management counseling that it had mandated. Because the district court did not use the disputed language regarding the probation officer’s i nvolvement at sentencing, and therefore gave Calhoun no opportunity to object before the entry of the written judgment, abuse of discretion review applies. See United States v. Bigelow , 462 F.3d 378, 381 (5th Cir. 2006). Without reaching Calhoun’s constitutional argument, we conclude,

a s we have in several similar unpublished cases, that the written jud g m e nt creates an ambiguity regarding whether the district court intended to delegate authority not only to implement treatment but to decide whether treatment was needed. See , e.g. , United States v. Turpin , 393 F. App’x 172, 174 (5th Cir. 2010); United States v. Vasquez , 371 F. App’x 541, 542-43 (5th Cir. 2010); United States

v. Lo p ez-Muxtay , 344 F. App’x 964, 965-66 (5th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we vacate the judgment and remand the case so that the district court may clarify the condition of supervised release at issue. VACATED AND REMANDED.

2 Case: 11-41018 Document: 00511879306 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2012
Filed 11/20/2019 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2019 ND 269

Eybon Avyon Watkins, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20190085

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial 

District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mark Sherer, Dickinson, N.D., for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Julie Lawyer, Bismarck, N.D., for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.
1

Watkins v. State

No. 20190085

Per Curiam. 

[¶1] Eybon Avyon Watkins appeals from an order denying his petition for 

post-conviction relief. Following a jury trial, Watkins was convicted of 

committing the offense of robbery in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-22-01. 

Watkins petitioned for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of 

counsel during the trial. After a hearing, the district court denied the petition. 

[¶2] We summarily affirm the district court’s order under N.D.R.App.P. 

35.1(a)(2) concluding the court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and 

the court did not err in determining that Watkins failed to establish his 

counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness. 

The evidence supports the court’s findings that the errors Watkins claims his 

counsel committed were attributable to trial strategy. Noorlun v. State, 2007 

ND 118, ¶ 14, 736 N.W.2d 477; N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). 

[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

 Jon J. Jensen

 Daniel J. Crothers 

 Lisa Fair McEvers

 Jerod E. Tufte
TONI A. BOLLINGER,

Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT 

ASSISTANCE APPEALS 

COMMISSION AND U.S. 

POSTAL SERVICE,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-5007

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2017.

An appeal from an order from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals 

Commission.

Frank E. Brown, Chairman.

Toni A. Bollinger, pro se, Appellant.

Norman A. Blessing, General Counsel, Cristina A. Velez, Appellate Counsel, 

Tallahassee, for Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., LEWIS, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Turbodyne Technologies Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-64133) on Form S-8 of Turbodyne Technologies Inc. of our report dated March
15, 1999, except for the last paragraph of note 4, which is as of April 15,
1999, note 12, which is as of April 1, 1999, and note 13, which is as of April
15, 1999 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Turbodyne Technologies
Inc. as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in the December
31, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Turbodyne Technologies Inc.



KPMG LLP


/S/ KMPG LLP
Los Angeles, California
April 15, 1999
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 30, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 30, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0268. DONNA LYNN EVANS v. JOEL EDWIN MCNIEL.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration 

of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals 

Rule 13.

On October 06, 2016, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than October 17, 2016. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
SCAD-16-0000218

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL,

Petitioner,

vs.

ANTHONY P. LOCRICCHIO,

Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ODC CASE NOS. 13-066-9136 and 14-040-9183)

ORDER OF CLARIFICATION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon further review of Respondent Anthony P.

Locricchio’s November 25, 2016 motion, and the record in this

matter, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 25, 2016 order

of this court, granting an extension to Respondent Locricchio of

the effective date of his disbarment, is hereby clarified as

follows; that Respondent Locricchio’s activities with regards to

his legal practice during the present period up to December 26,

2016, when his disbarment becomes effective, are limited to

withdrawing from representation, notifying clients of his

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCAD-16-0000218

01-DEC-2016

10:14 AM
disbarment, and returning files and client property as

appropriate, pursuant to Rules 2.16(a), 2.16(b), and 2.16(c) of

the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai#i. 

Respondent Locricchio is not otherwise permitted to practice law

on behalf of clients, and is prohibited from filing further

documents in any court on behalf of clients, save for motions to

withdraw as counsel, nor is he otherwise permitted to appear in

court in representation of any third party.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no further extensions shall

be granted.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, December 1, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
---

Exhibit 32.1

SOHU.COM INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2008 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2008.



/s/ Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of DirectorsMay 9, 2008






-2-





---







-3-
# C_2016313EN.01002101.xml

| 27.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 313/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 313/21

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 August 2016

(2016/C 313/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1290 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4462 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85450 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4903 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0933 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2501 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,024 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3244 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4578 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3160 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4771 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4546 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7555 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5418 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5269 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 258,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,8622 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5318 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4893 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 906,00 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5349 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,290 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,1392 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,004 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6441 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7197 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,6470 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1290

JPY

Japanese yen

113,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4462

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85450

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4903

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0933

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2501

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,024

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3244

RON

Romanian leu

4,4578

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3160

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4771

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4546

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7555

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5418

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5269

KRW

South Korean won

1 258,02

ZAR

South African rand

15,8622

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5318

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4893

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 906,00

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5349

PHP

Philippine peso

52,290

RUB

Russian rouble

73,1392

THB

Thai baht

39,004

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6441

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7197

INR

Indian rupee

75,6470

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1 – CEO 906 Certification



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”) I, Laura A. Marriott, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|Date: April 1, 2013 | /s/ Laura A. Marriott          
|------------------- | -------------------------------
|                    | Laura A. Marriott              
|                    | Chief Executive Officer        
|                    | and Principal Executive Officer
# C_2016157EN.01000201.xml

| 3.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 157/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 157/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 May 2016

(2016/C 157/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1493 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4414 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78248 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1803 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0999 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2330 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,048 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3833 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4815 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2080 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5025 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4388 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9170 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6368 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5410 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 307,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,3027 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4418 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5130 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 125,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4875 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,068 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,4081 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,076 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9731 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6826 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,3185 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1493

JPY

Japanese yen

122,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4414

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78248

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1803

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0999

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2330

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,048

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3833

RON

Romanian leu

4,4815

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2080

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5025

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4388

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9170

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6368

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5410

KRW

South Korean won

1 307,85

ZAR

South African rand

16,3027

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4418

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5130

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 125,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4875

PHP

Philippine peso

54,068

RUB

Russian rouble

74,4081

THB

Thai baht

40,076

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9731

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6826

INR

Indian rupee

76,3185

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
ex107.htm




Ex. 10.7.


 


Smith Employment Understanding


 







 


(i)       Salary. Executive shall receive initial base monthly salary Compensation in the amount of $ 7,500 ("Base Salary").


 


(ii)      Payment. The Base Salary Compensation shall be payable in accordance with the customary payroll practices of the Company, but in no event less frequently than monthly.


 







 


Employee to enter into a comprehensive employment agreement during Q2 2013