alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1
 SUBSIDIARIES OF OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
 Jurisdiction ofName of Entity
    
    FormationAccumux Technologies, Inc.
    
    CaliforniaCayman Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Cayman IslandsF3 Inc.
    
    TaiwanKing Galaxy International Limited
    
    British Virgin IslandsOCP Asia, Inc.
    
    TaiwanOCP Asia Investment, Inc.
    
    TaiwanOplink Communications (HK) Limited
    
    Hong KongOplink Macau Commercial Services Company Limited
    
    Macau, ChinaOptical Communication Products (Europe) Ltd
    
    United KingdomOptical Communication Products, Inc.
    
    DelawareShanghai Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Shanghai, ChinaTaiwan Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    TaiwanZhuhai FTZ Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Zhuhai, ChinaZhuhai FTZ Oplink Optical Communications, Inc.
(formerly Zhuhai Oplink Communications, Inc.)
    
    Zhuhai, China
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EYI Industries,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-2 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
  "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.         The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.         The information
  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operation of the Company.

|Date:            October 7
      th, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Jay Sargeant       
|----------------------------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                                          | Name:  | Jay Sargeant           
|                                          | Title: | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
  906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting
  the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
  written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to EYI Industries,
  Inc. and will be retained by EYI Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
  and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# C_2016251EN.01000201.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/2

---

Taking of the oath by new Members of the General Court

(2016/C 251/02)

Following their appointment as Judges at the General Court for the period from 29 May 2016 to 31 August 2019 by decision of the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union of 24 May 2016 (1), Ms Reine, Mr Schalin and Mr Xuereb took the oath before the Court of Justice on 8 June 2016.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 141, 28.5.2016, p. 76.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OFPERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS**

The undersigned hereby certifies that this Quarterly Report on Form10-Qfor the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial conditions and results of operations of  Summus,Inc. (USA).

 

| Date:      May 15, 2003 |  /s/ Bjorn D. Jawerth                                             Bjorn D. JawerthChief Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order entered November 30, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00363-CR

ALIREZA NIKMANESH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-80085-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 22, 2016 unopposed second motion to extend 

time to file appellant’s brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief received on 

November 22, 2016 is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7006

BENJAMIN CHARLES ASHLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-00-913-2) Submitted: October 3, 2001 Decided: October 31, 2001 Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Benjamin Charles Ashley, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Benjamin Charles Ashley appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ashley v. Angelone , No. CA-00-913-2 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001021810
<NAME>                        InteliData Technologies Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    Dec-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                                     27,255
<SECURITIES>                               10,657
<RECEIVABLES>                               2,287
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (718)
<INVENTORY>                                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           39,801
<PP&E>                                      4,924
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,642)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             43,278
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       9,708
<BONDS>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                       39
<OTHER-SE>                                 33,531
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               43,278
<SALES>                                       673
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            5,101
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               2,720
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           27,699
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            24,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                  488
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        23,920
<DISCONTINUED>                               (262)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               23,658
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.58


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

KEVIN WILLIAMS,

Appellant 

v.

JOSEPH C. MADENSPACHER, ET AL., 

DONALD R. TOTARO, LAWRENCE F. 

STENGEL, CHRISTOPHER HACKMAN, 

VICKI G. BOMGARDNER, MARK F. 

WALMER, THOMAS A. KISS,

 Appellees 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 90 MAP 2016

Appeal from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court dated June 8, 2016 

and exited June 9, 2016 at Docket No.

342 MD 2016.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016, the Brief for the Appellant, treated 

as a Notice of Appeal, is QUASHED.
Exhibit 10(a)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of
Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 3, 2013, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 22, 2013, with respect to the financial
statements of the subaccounts of the Separate Account VA B, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 58 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 033-33085) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related Transamerica LandmarkSM Variable Annuity. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des
Moines, Iowa 
 April 22, 2013 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of Additional
Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 3, 2013, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Transamerica Life Insurance Company, and (2) dated April 22, 2013, with respect to the financial statements
of the subaccounts of the Separate Account VA B, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 58 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 033-33085) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related MEMBERS LandmarkSM Variable Annuity. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des
Moines, Iowa 
 April 22, 2013
AlliedSignal Inc. - T&TBS
                           GARRETT AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
                             3201 W. Lomita Blvd.
                              Torrence, CA 90503

                          SUPPLY AGREEMENT AMENDMENT
                                 June 6, 1994


This Supply Agreement Amendment changes paragraph 3.2(B) under section 3.0
Price of the original Supply Agreement between supplier Baja Oriente ("Seller")
and AlliedSignal Inc. on behalf of Garrett Automotive Group ("Buyer"), signed
January 1, 1994.  The parties agree to the Amendment as follows.

3.0                      PRICE:

3.2 (B)                  The price of Aluminum is established at $0.56/lb for
                         319 Aluminum alloy, fand $0.59/lb foro 356 Aluminum
                         Alloy per the Metal Week Midwest Transactions dated
                         11/23/93.  The prices shall be adjusted during the
                         year 1994 only, commencing June 1, to reflect cost
                         decreases or increases by Seller resulting from
                         changes to the published prices of plus or minus ten
                         percent (10%) from the price stated.  The Metal Week
                         Midwest Transactions will serve as the agreed upon
                         published price source.  Adjustments shall be no more
                         frequent than once during any three month period.

                         
                         Negotiations will take place between the Seller and
                         Buyer in November 1994 to determine whether to set the
                         mutually agreed upon metal market price for the entire
                         year of 1995, or continue with the paragraph. 
                         Negotiations will take place again in November 1995 to
                         determine whether to set the mutually agreed upon
                         metal market price for the entire year of 1996, or
                         continue with the quarterly adjustments as outlined in
                         the above paragraph.


SELLER                                      BUYER

Baja Oriente                                AlliedSignal Inc.
                                            Automotive Sector

BY: "Michael J. Joyce"                      BY: "Edward B"
     ---------------------------            -----------------------------

TITLE: President                            TITLE: MGR, GRP Purchasing
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

RUSSELL TERRY McELVAIN,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 11

- 00170

- CR

Appeal from the

Criminal District Court Number Two

of Tarrant County, Texas

(TC# 1227000D)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2013.

GUADALUPE RIVERA, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certifications**
I, Wayne K. Bailey, certify that:
1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ocean West Holding Corporation; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;
(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report basedon such evaluation; and
(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscalquarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the smallbusiness issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.  The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the smallbusiness issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date February 18, 2005 /s/ Wayne K. Bailey   Wayne K. Bailey   Chief Financial Officer  
15
<PAGE>   1







EXHIBIT 23
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-20235, 333-20237, 333-20241, and 333-23161) of
MemberWorks Incorporated of our report dated July 29, 1997 appearing in Appendix
B to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by
reference of our report on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears on
page 17 of this Form 10-K.

PriceWaterhouse LLP
New York, New York
September  29, 1997
United States Court of Appeals for 

the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

November 9, 2011 

ERRATA 

______________________ 

2009-1589 

__________________________ 

TYPHOON TOUCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

DELL, INC. and LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., 

 Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

SAND DUNE VENTURES, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC., 

 Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

FUJITSU AMERICA, INC. 

(formerly known as Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation), 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 
APPLE, INC., 

Defendant, 

and 

HTC AMERICA, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

PALM, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_____________________ 

Decided November 4, 2011 

Precedential Opinion 

_____________________ 

Please make the following changes: 

Page 3, add attorneys and firms represented 

JOHN FULTON, JR., Malloy & Malloy, P.A., of Miami, 

Florida, for defendant-appellee San Dune Ventures, Inc. 

With him on the brief was JOHN C. MALLOY, III.
***Exhibit
      32.*** ***2
      – CFO 906 Certification***




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO** **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frank
      J. Pazera, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best
      of
      my knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: March
                27, 2008
            */s/
                Frank J. Pazera*Frank
                J. PazeraChief
                Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
                Officer
(D-/Z-lS2-c£

cfifr

J& /cs/i&tnz Xf -^*gl<Sb/lL&Zs2 /t~Af~Jo/j

./atifc /^'^/ 7/t^f- %&xe /sad sdtjct-sft&e af~

^re-«^*<f 4n*?' feg? farf fat -r^A ^^V#

//lasite' jj/^ jf&tf tf&zts? x&s*^ -

RECEIVED

DEC 0 5 2016

COURT OF APPEALS

WACO. TEXAS

'&^g£ ^V'T^
•i. %£* •& >.n* :' *•£-

Ai'-iARILLO "TX. 79

Ol. 'DEC 2.0'ixy PM I i

RECEIVED

DEC 05 2018

COURT OF .WEALS

WAC0JEXAS_

r - I o s-i - -/ - f

'".jiji|jji,i..|.i|,j|ni,|,ij''''«'|jj"J
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-14-0382

SAT Date: 3/14/2014

Print Date: 8/4/2014

Related cases:

 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health:

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: CORR-ALL TISSUE; CARDIAC SENS; AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-14-0382

FATE: Estimations for low weight 

The EPI estimations for this cation may not be reliable.

log Kow = 6.13 (E)

log Koc = 6.36 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)

log Fish BAF = 4.22 (E)

PMN Substance: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Dispersible

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)
BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90-99 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor from the skin, moderate from the GI 

tract, and good from the lung (analog). Concern for corrosion to all tissues based on data for 

 (corrosive to eye and skin of rabbit) and (corrosive to rabbit skin at 

concentrations >1% ai) and; cardiac sensitization based on 

, reviewed in the Standard Review of (NOEL = 15 mg/kg in rats and 0.06 

mg/kg in rabbits).

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.023 0.14

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.05 0.056

green algal 96-h EC50 0.151 0.018

fish _ chronic value 0.008 ACR18

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.004 ACR14

algal _ chronic 

value

0.067 0.013

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR-nearest analog method for cationic 

 in the largest two hydrophobes; SAR chemical 

class MW466; pH7; effective concentrations based 

on 100% active ingredients and mean measured.

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs Cationic s

SAR Class Cationic 

Ecotox Category Cationi
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916