alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 3.4**

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT  OF  HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC.

** **

Pursuant to the provisions of Section 607.1006 of the Florida Business  Corporation Act, High Speed Net Solutions, Inc. (the “Corporation”), a  corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Florida  hereby certifies as follows:

1.         The name of the  Corporation is High Speed Net Solutions, Inc.

2.         The Amended and Restated  Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation shall be amended by replacing  Article I in its entirety as follows:

“Article I

           The name of the Corporation is  Summus, Inc. (USA).”

3.             This amendment was approved by the shareholders of the Corporation at a duly  called and convened special meeting held on February 27, 2002.  This  amendment required the vote of the holders of shares of common stock and the  holders of shares of the Corporation’s Series B Convertible Preferred Stock,  voting together as a single class.  The number of votes cast for the  amendment identified in Section 2 above was sufficient for the approval of  such amendment.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused these Articles of Amendment  to be executed in its name and on its behalf by its Chief Operating Officer  and attested by its Corporate Secretary on this 27th day of February, 2002,  hereby declaring and certifying that this is the act and deed of the  Corporation and that the statements contained herein are affirmed as true  under penalties of perjury.

 

                                                                                                                HIGH SPEED NET SOLUTIONS, INC

                                                                                                               By:      /s/ Gary E. Ban                                                                                                           Gary E. Ban                                                                                   Chief Operating  Officer

ATTEST:

By:  /s/ Robert S. Lowrey      Robert S. LowreyAssistant Corporate Secretary
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-4500

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FELIPE MARTINEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Daniel

Espalla-Pedrasa,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (1:04-cr-00118-2)

Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 19, 2006

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reid G. Brown, Waynesville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill

Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville,

North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Felipe Martinez-Garcia pled guilty to one count of

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamines,

cocaine, and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841; 846

(2000). Martinez-Garcia was sentenced to 188 months’ imprisonment.

We affirm the conviction and sentence.

Counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting there were no meritorious grounds

for appeal, but raising the issue of whether the sentence imposed

by the district court was reasonable. Although Martinez-Garcia was

informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, he did

not do so.

Because the district court properly calculated and

considered the advisory guideline range and weighed the relevant 18

U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000) factors, we conclude Martinez-Garcia’s

188-month sentence, which was below the statutory minimum and at

the bottom of the advisory guideline range, is reasonable. See

United States v. Hughes, 401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th Cir. 2005); see

also United States v. Green, 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.) (stating

a sentence imposed within a properly calculated guideline range is

presumptively reasonable), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 2309 (2006).

In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the entire

record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for

appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in
- 3 -

writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United

States for further review. If the client requests that a petition

be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be

frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave to withdraw

from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy

thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
10/13/2611 15:42 gg72765291 IJILKERSON PAGE 02 

WILKERSON 

HOZUBIN 

IIDK STREET. SUITE-tOJ 

SjyOTORAGCAK 53501 

TEL: (SOT) 276-5307 

FAX. CJOT) 276-5231 

i;^ANSPORWIOrJ 

• '"•;;;•;[-•!• np f RATIONS 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ^' "'"'""''''' 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

ZG;1 OCi !1 P i^ 3b 

In the Matter of: 

TGI FREIGHT 

) 

}FAA Docket No. CP10T^M0012 

}DMS NO. FAA-2010-1079 

)Judge RICHARD C. GOODWIN 

REQUEST FOR ALTERNATIVE HEARING DATES 

TGI Freight, through counsel, Willcerson Hozubin, requests 

alternative hearing dates for this matter. TGI'3 Expert 

Witness is unavailable to testify during the December 7-9, 

2011, hearing dates. TGI and its witnesses are available 

December 12-15, 2011, or the week of November 1, 2011. TGI 

respectfully requests thcit the Court reschedule the hearing in 

thi3 matter. 

DATED this / -^ _ day of October, 2011. 

WILKERSON HOZUBIH 

Attorneys for T( 

By: 

. Alaska Bar 
10/13/2011 15:^2 9072765291 WILKERSON PAGE 03 

WILKERSON 

HOZUBIN 

110 K STREET, SLTTE 403 

ANCHORAGE, AK ODSOi 

TEL: (907J 378-5:97 

FA;C:CD07j2?&ja>l 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on Che 

13th day of October, 2011, a true 

and correct copy of the foregoing 

was served on the following: 

Originaa Plus 1 Copy-VXA Facaimile and U.S. Mail 

Federal Aviation Administration 

000 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 ' 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10Q0 

(202) 493-5123 - fax 

1 Copy—VIA FagsJJDJlQ 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodv/in, Administrative Law Judge 

U,S, Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

.1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building, Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

(202) 366-7536 - fax 

One Gopv-VIA U.S. Mail 

Howard L. Maruin, Jr. 

Regional Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaska Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7"-^ Avenue iflA 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

One CopY-VIA U.3. Mall 

Cheryl M. Jones, Sr. ACCorney 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Alaska Region 

Federal Aviation Adriiniscration 

222. West 7^^ Avenue ^14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-75C*7 

WILKERSO LKERSON HOZUBI HOZUBINN ^ 

By; 

C^ro-T L. Ma 

91.00/942/plead/RBquest for Alternative Hearing Date; 

Request for Alternative Hearing Dates 

In the Hatter of TGI Freiqhc 

Docket No. CP10NM0012 

Page 2
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Brian Keith Wall, * From the County Court

 of Ector County,

Trial Court No. 15-4640.

Vs. No. 11-16-00179-CR * November 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has considered Brian Keith Wall’s motion to withdraw his notice 

of appeal and concludes that the motion should be granted. Therefore, in 

accordance with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
Order entered August 25 , 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 15
- 00788
- CV GLM DFW, INC., Appellant
V. ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIV ERY COMPANY, LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 116th Judicial District Court Dallas County, T exas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 12
- 13226 

### O RDER The Court has been notified that a petition for bankruptcy has been filed in United States Bankruptcy Court concerning appellant. Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362, further action in this cause is automatically st ayed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8.2. Accordingly, for administrative purposes, this cause is ABATED and will be treated as a closed case. It may be reinstated on prompt motion by any party showing that the stay has been lifted and specifying what further acti on, if any, is required from this Court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 8.3.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 of TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. (File Nos. 333-107995, 333-120986 and
333-122510) of our report dated February 28, 2006, included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB of TURBODYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2005. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the
Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

/s/ Vasquez & Company, LLP
--------------------------
Los Angeles, California
July 11, 2006
Exhibit 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF TUMBLEWEED COMMUNICATIONS CORP.



AS OF MARCH 16, 2005



|                               |  |                       |  |                         
|------------------------------ |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Subsidiary                     |  | Date of Incorporation |  | Country of Incorporation
|Corvigo, LLC                   |  | March 16, 2004        |  | U.S.A.                  
|Incubator, Limited             |  | January 28, 2002      |  | U.K.                    
|Interface Systems, Inc.        |  | January 15, 1998      |  | U.S.A.                  
|Tumbleweed Communications EOOD |  | October 13, 2003      |  | Bulgaria
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

LAWRENCE BRANDON,

Petitioner

v.

TAX CLAIM BUREAU, DIRECTOR, JOANN RANCK,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 365 WAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 13th day of April, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 03649**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 03649\03649_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03649\03649_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 03649\03649_Followup Questions answered.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

03649\03649_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 03649\03649_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03649\03649_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03649\03649_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03649\03649_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03649\03649_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 03649\03649_telecon1.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03649\03649_telecon2.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 03649\03649_telecon3.pdf Plant submitted survey file

03649\Certification Statement_03649.pdf Plant certification statement x 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS BA12 BA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U1 FA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U2 FA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U3 BA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U3 FA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJGS U4 BA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_SJSG U4 FA System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03649\Supporting Documentation\03649_WTS-1 ICR SJGS.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 03649\Supporting Documentation\WB1 ICR SJGS.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Oak Creek Homes, LP and * From the 259th District Court

21st Mortgage Corporation, of Jones County,

 Trial Court No. 022737.

Vs. No. 11-15-00291-CV * November 30, 2016

Joe and Brenda Moore, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal 

should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed. The costs incurred by reason of this appeal 

are taxed against Oak Creek Homes, LP and 21st Mortgage Corporation.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Wyomissing Area School District, : Appellant :

:

v. :

: Zoning Hearing Board of Wyomissing : Borough, and Wyomissing Borough :

: Wyomissing Area School District :

:

v. :

: Wyomissing Borough, and Michelle : Bare, in her official capacity as the : Building and Zoning Offic ial of : Wyomissing Borough : No. 447 C.D. 2015

O R D E R

NOW, December 29, 2015

, having considered appellees ’ application

for reargument en banc and appellant’s response in opposition thereto

, the

application is denied.

_____________________________ DAN PELLEGRINI

, President Judge
# C_2016248EN.01000201.xml

| 8.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7949 — Norwegian/Shiphold/OSM Aviation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 248/03)

On 31 May 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7949. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7949. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2770 

To require the Secretary of State to designate the Taliban as a foreign 

terrorist organization. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 

Mr. COTTON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of State to designate the Taliban 

as a foreign terrorist organization. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE TALIBAN AS A FOREIGN 

4 TERRORIST ORGANIZATION. 

5 The Secretary of State shall designate the Taliban 

6 as a foreign terrorist organization in accordance with sec7 tion 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 

8 1189). 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
P. 1



# OAR Box 1867 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 61 ) ll-B-11 5 Docket Number: 

# A-90-1 9

Printed 12/2/20086:27:22 AM

Sheet 61 of 95P. 2 

## A-90-1 9 ll-B-11 5 

## PENDING CONFIDENT

V%. Th e following informatio n i s locate d i n th e confidentia l file s o f th e Director , Emissio n Standard s Division , Offic e o f Ai r Qualit yPlanning an d Standards , U . S . Environmenta l Protectio n Agency , Researc hTriangl e Park , Nort h Carolina 27711 . Thi s informatio n i s confidentia l pending fina l determinatio n b yth e Administrato r an

d i s no t availabl e fo r publi c inspection . W . Floyd , Radia n Corporation , t o Proces s Vent s Docke t A-90-19 , January1991 , HO NNESHAP : Industry Characteristics/Resorcinol . 2 6 pages . CB I Documen t Contro l No . 86/23 , PPS-115 .
Motions Granted; Memorandum Opinion filed November 1, 2016, 

Withdrawn; Appeal Reinstated, and Order filed December 1, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00545-CV

____________

REYNA ISABEL TABORDA AND PHILLIP L. HURLEY, Appellants

V.

SRINIVASACHARY V. TAMIRISA AND BARRY POWELL, Appellees

On Appeal from the 400th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-DCV-221564

ORDER

This court issued an opinion dismissing this appeal on November 1, 2016. 

The same day, appellants timely filed a motion for rehearing, which we construe as 

a motion to reinstate. Appellants also filed a motion to extend time to file their notice 

of appeal. Both motions are GRANTED.

This court’s opinion filed November 1, 2016, is WITHDRAWN, and our 

judgment of that date is VACATED. The appeal is ordered REINSTATED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Christopher.
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.’s 333-87944, 333-27973, and 333-128959 on Forms S-8 of our report dated August 18, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Schiff Nutrition International,
Inc. for the year ended May 31, 2009.

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report also included the consolidated financial statement schedule of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc., listed in Item 15.  This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc’s management.  Our
responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such consolidated financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth therein.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
August 18, 2009
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
        <S> <C>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Balance Sheet at December 31, 1998 and Income Statement for the year 
ended December 31, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                 19,792
<SECURITIES>                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                          18,706
<ALLOWANCES>                           6,580
<INVENTORY>                            27,171
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       185,511
<PP&E>                                 1,892
<DEPRECIATION>                         0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         187,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  498,735
<BONDS>                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  0
<PREFERRED>                            0
<COMMON>                               10,635
<OTHER-SE>                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           187,403
<SALES>                                84,659
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       84,659
<CGS>                                  67,959
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          367,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     28,518
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (350,314)
<INCOME-TAX>                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    0
<DISCONTINUED>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                        50,185
<CHANGES>                              0
<NET-INCOME>                           (300,129)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                          (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                          (0.03)

        

</TABLE>
# C_2015344EN.01000201.xml

| 17.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 October 2015

(2015/C 344/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1360 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4597 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73560 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3557 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0809 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2005 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,081 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,68 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2383 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4167 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2972 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5654 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4685 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8041 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6737 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5714 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 284,80 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9339 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2159 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6285 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 359,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7462 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,250 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,2640 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,108 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3792 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7145 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,6891 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1360

JPY

Japanese yen

135,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4597

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73560

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3557

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0809

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2005

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,081

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,68

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2383

RON

Romanian leu

4,4167

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2972

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5654

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4685

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8041

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6737

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5714

KRW

South Korean won

1 284,80

ZAR

South African rand

14,9339

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2159

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6285

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 359,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7462

PHP

Philippine peso

52,250

RUB

Russian rouble

70,2640

THB

Thai baht

40,108

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3792

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7145

INR

Indian rupee

73,6891

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---