alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.7


 


TERMINATION AGREEMENT


 


This Termination Agreement
is dated October 4, 2021 (the “Termination Agreement”), by and between Alberton Acquisition Corporation, a British Virgin
Islands exempted company (the "Company”) and Hong Ye Hong Kong Shareholding Co., Limited, a Hong Kong company (“Hong
Ye”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Hong Ye are party to a certain agreement dated as of August 11, 2021 (the “Note Conversion Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Note Conversion
Agreement contemplated that Hong Ye would convert 50% of the outstanding principal amount of certain existing notes into the ordinary
shares of the Company;


 


WHEREAS, as of the date of
this Termination Agreement, Hong Ye has not converted any outstanding principal amount of the note into ordinary shares of the Company
pursuant to the Note Conversion Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the Company has entered
into certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 4, 2021, pursuant to which the Company will issue convertible notes in the aggregated
amount of $10,000,000 to certain investors, the principal of which will be used to pay off the existing indebtedness of the Company as
of the closing of the Merger including the outstanding notes to Hong Ye; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish
to terminate the existing Note Conversion Agreement;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and other promises contained in this Termination Agreement, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Buyer agree as follows:


 


Section 1. Termination.


 


The Company and Buyer hereby
agree that the Note Conversion Agreement will terminate effective as of the date of this Termination Agreement and shall be of no further
force or effect.


 


Section 2. No Termination
Fee.


 


The Company and Buyer hereby
agree that there is no termination fee, penalties or any financial obligation on either party in connection with the termination.


 


Section 3. Mutual
Release.


 


Each party, on behalf of itself
and its respective affiliates, agents, parents, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, hereby releases the other party and its affiliates,
agents, parents, subsidiaries, successors and assigns from any and all claims, obligations and liabilities arising from or relating to
the Note Conversion Agreement, which agreement and any continuing obligations thereunder are hereby terminated and of no further force
and effect.


 


Section 4. Governing
Law.


 


This Termination Agreement shall be governed by
and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


 






     


     


    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have duly executed this Termination Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	COMPANY	 
	 	 	 
	Alberton Acquisition Corporation	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Guan Wang	 
	Name: 	Guan Wang	 
	Title: 	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 
	HONG YE 	 
	 	 	 
	Hong Ye Hong Kong Shareholding Co., Limited	 
	 	 	 
	By: 	/s/ Guan Wang	 
	Name: 	 	 
	Title:
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5262

_____________________________
L EON J EFFREY N ICELY , J UNIOR ,
Petitioner
,

v.

R ONNIE F USSELL , Clerk
, Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

– Original Jurisdiction.

January 30, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ENIED

.
L EWIS , O STERHAUS , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Leon Jeffrey Nicely, Junior, pro se
, Petitioner

. No appearance for Respondent

.
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The certification set forth
below is being submitted in connection with this amendment to the annual report on Form 10-K of Deltic Timber Corporation (the report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.



Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Clefton D. Vaughan, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    RAY C. DILLONRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerAugust 12, 2005




/s/    CLEFTON D.
VAUGHANClefton D. VaughanChief Financial OfficerAugust 12, 2005
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**          I, Corey Rinker, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Intentionally omitted  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:  November 14, 2007           /s/  Corey Rinker   Corey Rinker    Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and
amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified, as such loan orloans may be refinanced, renewed or extended.     (d) The definition of “Permitted Lien” appearing in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreementis hereby amended (i) to insert the additional clause “(n) Liens granted in favor of theGerman Company and securing the obligations of the Borrower under the German IntercompanyLoan” immediately after clause (m) therein and (ii) to renumber the final clause in suchdefinition from “(n)” to “(o)”.     (e) Article VIII of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended to insert the followingSection 8.14 immediately following Section 8.13 appearing therein, and to renumber Sections8.14 and 8.15 as Sections “8.15” and “8.16”, respectively:     8.14 The German Company shall sell, assign, pledge, or otherwise transfer itsinterest in the German Intercompany Loan without the prior consent of the Lender orthe German Company’s security interest in the collateral pledged by the Borrower inconnection with such German Intercompany Loan shall be enforced or foreclosed upon.     2. Representations and Warranties. The Borrower hereby represents and warrants thatafter giving effect to the terms of this Amendment (i) no Default or Event of Default has occurredand is continuing and (ii) the representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreementshall be true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof, as though made onand as of such date (except to the extent that such representations and warranties relate solely toan earlier date).     3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and bydifferent parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and deliveredshall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. A signature page sent to the Lender orits counsel by facsimile or other electronic means (including in portable document format (.pdf))shall be effective as an original counterpart signature.     4. Section Titles. The section titles contained in this Amendment are and shall bewithout substance, meaning or content of any kind whatsoever and are not a part of the agreementbetween the parties hereto.     5. Governing Law. The validity of this Amendment, the construction, interpretation,and enforcement hereof, and the rights of the parties hereto with respect to all matters arisinghereunder or related hereto shall be determined under, governed by, and construed in accordancewith the laws of the State of Illinois.[Signature Pages Follow]
2

 
               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed as of the day and year first abovewritten.      **MIDWAY GAMES INC.**,
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17I0074. YERALDINE RINEY v. FRANK SARGENT.

In this case involving multiple parties, defendant Yeraldine Riney filed a

motion to dismiss Frank Sargent’s complaint, which the trial court denied on October 

5, 2016. The trial court entered an order certifying its ruling for immediate review

on October 18, 2016. Riney filed her application for interlocutory appeal on October

27, 2016. However, we lack jurisdiction.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a partymay request interlocutory review only if the

trial court certifies within 10 days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review

should be had. If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within that 10-day

period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until the final judgment

to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200 SE2d

748) (1973). Here, the trial court did not enter its certificate of immediate review

within 10 days of the order Riney seeks to appeal. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction

to consider this application for interlocutory appeal, which istherefore DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/22/2016

November 22, 2016
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-K for the year endingDecember 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Héctor Alonso, Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that: 

1. The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the registrant. 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

Date: April 9, 2007
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                         -----------------------------



The Board of Directors
Deltic Timber Corporation


We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-34317) on Form S-8 of Deltic Timber Corporation of our report dated February
13, 1998, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Deltic Timber
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1997, which report is
included in the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of Deltic Timber
Corporation.



KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Shreveport, Louisiana
March 27, 1998






                                      66
# C_2016007EN.01000701.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/7

---

Designation of the Chamber responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court

(2016/C 007/10)

At its General Meeting on 12 October 2015, the Court designated the Fourth Chamber as the Chamber that is, in accordance with Article 11(2) of the Rules of Procedure, responsible for cases of the kind referred to in Article 107 of those Rules, for the period from 12 October 2015 to 6 October 2016.

---
# C_2016028EN.01000101.xml

| 26.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7875 — ICG/Capiton/Prefere Resins Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 28/01)

On 22 December 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7875. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7875. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROLANDO OCHOA-ACUNA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74781

Agency No. A070-773-722

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010**

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Rolando Ochoa-Acuna, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

FILED

JUN 07 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-74781

We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence, Lim v. INS, 224 F.3d 929, 933 (9th Cir. 2000), and we deny the petition

for review.

Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Ochoa-Acuna

did not establish past persecution based on his participation in a civil defense patrol

because he failed to show a nexus between the harm he and his family suffered and

one of the statutorily protected grounds. See Sangha v. INS, 103 F.3d 1482, 1487

(9th Cir. 1997) (persecution by anti-government guerillas may not, “from that fact

alone, be presumed to be ‘on account of’ political opinion”). Substantial evidence

also supports the agency’s determination that Ochoa-Acuna failed to establish a

well-founded fear based upon his ability to reasonably relocate within Guatemala,

see 8 C.F.R. § 208.13(b)(1), and changed country conditions following the 1996

peace accords, see Gonzalez-Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 336 F.3d 995, 997-98 (9th Cir.

2003).

Because Ochoa-Acuna did not establish eligibility for asylum, it necessarily

follows that he did not satisfy the more stringent standard for withholding of

removal. See Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006).

Finally, substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief
3 07-74781

because Ochoa-Acuna failed to show that it is more likely than not that he would

be tortured if removed to Guatemala. See Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049,

1067-68 (9th Cir. 2009).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date: March 4, 2005                             By: /s/ David A. Dodge
     --------------                             ------------------------------
                                                Name:  David A. Dodge
                                                Title: Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                     32.2-1
Order filed November 29, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00603-CV

____________

WILLIAM H. POFF AND JULIA A. POFF, Appellants

V.

CYPRESS FOUR PROPERTY VENTURES LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C16-049

ORDER

This appeal is from a judgment signed May 23, 2016. Appellants filed a notice 

of appeal on May 31, 2016. On September 28, 2016, appellants filed a motion for 

enforcement of their affidavit of indigence filed in the trial court. 

On October 12, 2016, the trial court filed a partial clerk’s record which 

demonstrated appellants filed an affidavit of indigence and were found indigent after 

a hearing. On November 1, 2016, this court granted appellants’ motion for 
2

enforcement. Therefore, appellants are deemed indigent and may proceed without 

payment of costs on appeal. 

Accordingly, the Waller County Clerk is directed to file the clerk’s record 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001021907
<NAME> MS ACQUISITION CORP.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           4,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,623
<ALLOWANCES>                                       510
<INVENTORY>                                      8,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,441
<PP&E>                                          82,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           39,746
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             9
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,236)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,418
<SALES>                                        211,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,462
<CGS>                                          180,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,640
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,406
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,408
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,972
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,436
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,153
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,283
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>