alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ginger R. Beutel, Respondent, v Tyler J. Guild et al., Appellants.

[773 NYS2d 708]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Richard C. Kloch, Sr., A.J.) entered May 7, 2003. The order denied defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff to produce a copy of her no-fault file or provide an authorization for defendants to obtain the contents of the no-fault file.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by granting defendants’ motion in part and directing plaintiff to produce a copy of her no-fault file subject to any protective order issued and as modified the order is affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied that part of defendants’ motion seeking to compel plaintiff to provide an authorization for defendants to obtain the contents of her no-fault file *(see generally Dibble v Consolidated Rail Corp.,*181 AD2d 1041 [1992]). The court abused its discretion, however, in denying that part of defendants’ motion seeking to compel plaintiff to produce a copy of her no-fault file, and thus we modify the order accordingly. Defendants established that the records therein are material and necessary to the defense (see *Scott v Albord,*289 AD2d 389 [2001]; *see also Allen v Crowell-Collier Publ. Co.,*21 NY2d 403, 406-407 [1968]; see *generally*CPLR 3102 [a]). Therefore, subject to any protective order issued with respect to the contents of the file (see CPLR 3103 [a]), defendants are entitled to the contents of the no-fault file. Contrary to plaintiffs contention, our decision in *Primeau v Town of Amherst*(303 AD2d 1035, 1037 [2003]) does not compel a different result. In *Primeau,*we concluded that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the plaintiff to provide to the defendants the medical and wage records contained in the plaintiffs no-fault claim file. Although our decision in that case *1088does not so state, we note that Supreme Court also directed an in camera review with respect to the contents of the file alleged by the plaintiff to be privileged or exempt from disclosure. Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Hurlbutt, Scudder and Lawton, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002


By signing below, the Principal Executive Officer hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this report on Form 10-QSB fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Hybrid Fuels Inc.



Signed this 20th day of February 2007:



By: /s/ Douglas Dickie
--------------------------------
Douglas Dickie
Principal Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hybrid Fuels Inc. and will be
retained by Hybrid Fuels Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Kenneth G. Hodosy, Jr., Petitioner, v Board of Trustees of Roswell P. Flower Memorial Library, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 316]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, entered August 25, 2003 in Jefferson County [Hugh A. Gilbert, J.]) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found petitioner guilty of various specifications of incompetence and misconduct and dismissed him from his position.

It is hereby ordered that the determination be and the same hereby is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination finding him guilty of seven specifications of incompetence and misconduct following a hearing held pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 and dismissing him from his position as director of the Roswell R Flower Memorial Library. Contrary to petitioner’s contention, the determination is supported by substantial evidence *(see generally 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176, 180-181 [1978]). The evidence at the hearing establishes that petitioner did not comply with, inter alia, respondent’s requests to draft or propose a short- or long-term plan for the library and prepare a budget, nor did he conduct the requested staff evaluations. Because the two members of respondent Board of Trustees who testified at the hearing held pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75 absented themselves from respondent’s deliberations following the hearing, we reject the contention of petitioner that respondent had predetermined his guilt. Further, petitioner’s dismissal was not an abuse of discretion *(see*CPLR 7803 [3]; *Matter of Featherstone v Franco,*95 NY2d 550, 554 [2000]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Pine, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.
Order entered November 10, 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 19
- 00896
- CR
KYLE HERMAN HIBBARD , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 265 th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F
- 1951973
- R
O RDER Before the Court is attorney Lawrence B. M itchell ’ s Motion to Withdraw this Court ’ s October 26, 2022 Order denying his request that the Court withdraw its Octob er 7, 2022 O rder ordering him to pr ovide appellant wi th copies of all motions filed with the Court on appellant ’ s behalf, copies of court communications, responses, orders, and man dates in this case, and two copies of the Court ’ s opinion

.W e DE NY Lawre nce B. Mi t chell ’ s November 4, 2022 Motion to Withdraw Order and D IRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of the filings and orders in this case from September 2, 2022 (the date this Court received appellant ’ s A ugust 29, 2022 request for re cords) t hrough the da te of this Order to Kyle Hibbard at #2 40865 3 NE: Middleton Unit 13055 FM 3522 A bilene, Texas 79601

.
/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PHILOME CESAR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 581 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 22, 2016

No. 04-16-00065-CV

Hugo Xavier DE LOS SANTOS,

Appellant

v.

COMMISSION FOR LAWYER DISCIPLINE,

Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-CI-20086

The Honorable Tonya Parker, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to December 16, 2016. “NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF 

TIME WILL BE ALLOWED.”

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Order entered November 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00331-CR

BENITO PENA JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 416th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 416-81691-2015

ORDER

We GRANT the appellant’s November 21, 2016 third motion to extend time to file his brief 

and ORDER the brief received on November 21, 2016 filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
----

**CERTIFICATION OF   CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER   PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 I, Jay Sargeant, Chief Executive Officer of EYI Industries,  Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that, to the best of my knowledge:

|   | (i)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company,        for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004, and to which this certification        is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Report”) fully complies        with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange        Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|   | (ii)   | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                                        |

|   | By:    | */s/ Jay Sargeant*      |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   |   |                         |
|   | Name:  | Jay Sargeant            |
|   | Title: | Chief Executive Officer |
|   | Date:  | August 16, 2004         |

*A signed original of this written statement required by  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or its staff upon request.*

*This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made  before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation  language contained in such filing.*

----
# C_2015199EN.01000101.xml

| 16.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 June 2015

(2015/C 199/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1218 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,54 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4598 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72340 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1780 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0512 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7120 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,279 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,30 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1573 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4880 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0738 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4466 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3845 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6972 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6053 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5107 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 253,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,9372 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9653 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5755 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 953,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2185 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,735 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,5060 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,818 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5134 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3273 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,9831 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1218

JPY

Japanese yen

138,54

DKK

Danish krone

7,4598

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72340

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1780

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0512

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7120

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,279

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,30

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1573

RON

Romanian leu

4,4880

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0738

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4466

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3845

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6972

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6053

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5107

KRW

South Korean won

1 253,50

ZAR

South African rand

13,9372

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9653

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5755

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 953,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2185

PHP

Philippine peso

50,735

RUB

Russian rouble

61,5060

THB

Thai baht

37,818

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5134

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3273

INR

Indian rupee

71,9831

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Order entered December 2, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00859-CV

KIRKSTALL ROAD ENTERPRISES, INC., Appellant

V.

ARKING JONES, Appellee

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-16-01794

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 30, 2016 unopposed motion for extension of 

time to file appellant’s reply brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief 

shall be filed by December 23, 2016. 

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 2.11

                               February 15, 1999


Kevco, Inc.
1300 South University
Suite 200
Fort Worth, Texas 76107
Attention: Jerry E. Kimmel




Dear Mr. Kimmel:


     Reference is made to the Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated
as of December 23, 1998, between Kevco, Inc. (the "Company") and Wingate
Partners II, L.P. ("Wingate"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

     As of the date hereof the Closing has not occurred and the conditions to
the obligations of Wingate set forth in Article VIII of the Agreement have not
been fulfilled. In accordance with Section 12.1(b) of the Agreement, Wingate
hereby terminates the Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.


                                     Very Truly Yours,

                                                  
                                     WINGATE PARTNERS II, L.P.

                                     By:  Wingate Management Company II, L.P.
                                          its general partner

                                     By:  Wingate Management Limited, L.L.C.
                                          its general partner

                                     By:  /s/ JAMES JOHNSON
                                          -------------------------------------
                                              James Johnson
                                              Principal
# C_2015049EN.01000201.xml

| 12.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 February 2015

(2015/C 49/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1314 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4440 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73960 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4585 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0465 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6020 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,680 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2180 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4473 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8252 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4606 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4268 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7726 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5272 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5388 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 250,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,3805 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0630 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,7218 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 510,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0918 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,292 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,6600 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,929 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2370 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9653 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,5490 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1314

JPY

Japanese yen

135,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4440

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73960

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4585

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0465

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6020

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,680

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2180

RON

Romanian leu

4,4473

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8252

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4606

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4268

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7726

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5272

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5388

KRW

South Korean won

1 250,19

ZAR

South African rand

13,3805

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0630

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,7218

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 510,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0918

PHP

Philippine peso

50,292

RUB

Russian rouble

74,6600

THB

Thai baht

36,929

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2370

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9653

INR

Indian rupee

70,5490

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of River Capital Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Howard Taylor, Chairman (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| (1)    | The Report   fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                     |
| (2)    | The   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

| /s/ Howard   Taylor            |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                                |   |
| Howard   Taylor President      |   |
| (Chief   Executive Officer and |   |
| Chief   Financial Officer)     |   |
|                           |   |
|                           |   |
| August 14,   2007              |   |

22
Filed 12/5/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 228

Justin Lynn Yarbro, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160176

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Debbie Gordon Kleven, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Laura C. Ringsak, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Mark J. McCarthy and Meredith H. Larson, Grand Forks County State’s Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, ND 58206-5607, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Yarbro v. State

No. 20160176

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Justin Yarbro appeals from a district court order denying post-conviction relief.  In 2013, Yarbro was convicted by a jury of continuous sexual abuse of a child.  After the jury returned its verdict, Yarbro moved for a new trial.  The district court denied his motion for a new trial.  Yarbro appealed, and this Court affirmed the district court judgment.  State v. Yarbro, 2014 ND 164, 851 N.W.2d 146.  In 2015, Yarbro applied for post-conviction relief.  The district court held an evidentiary hearing and denied his application.  Yarbro appealed, arguing the district court erred in denying post-conviction relief because his trial attorney’s conduct fell below an objective standard of reasonableness, and because he was prejudiced by his trial attorney’s lack of diligence and poor preparation.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 28, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00384

- CR

Graham Bradford LASCSAK

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court

, Atascosa County, Texas
Tri al Court No. 19

- 08

- 0207

- CRA
Honorable Russell Wilson , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Liche Cavazos ’ Notification of Late Reporter ’ s Record is this date NOTED. The Reporter ’ s Record is due November 19, 2021.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justic e

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said
court on this 28th day of October, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, C lerk of Court