alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2777 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize the Secretary 

of Health and Human Services to make adjustments to payment rates 

for skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare program to account 

for certain unique circumstances. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 

Mr. SCHATZ (for himself, Ms. MURKOWSKI, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. SULLIVAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to authorize 

the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make 

adjustments to payment rates for skilled nursing facilities under the Medicare program to account for certain 

unique circumstances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equitable Payments 

5 for Nursing Facilities Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2777 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZING THE SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

2 HUMAN SERVICES TO MAKE ADJUSTMENTS 

3 TO PAYMENT RATES FOR SKILLED NURSING 

4 FACILITIES UNDER THE MEDICARE PRO5 GRAM TO ACCOUNT FOR CERTAIN UNIQUE 

6 CIRCUMSTANCES. 

7 Section 1888(e)(4)(G) of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 1395yy(e)(4)(G)) is amended by adding at the end 

9 the following new clause: 

10 ‘‘(iv) ADJUSTMENT FOR UNIQUE CIR11 CUMSTANCES.—The Secretary may provide 

12 for such adjustments as determined appro13 priate by the Secretary to take into ac14 count the unique circumstances of skilled 

15 nursing facilities located in Alaska or Ha16 waii.’’. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Acrongenomics, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Constantine Poulios, the President (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 15, 2007

|/s/ Platon
      Tzouvalis    | 
|----------------------------- | 
|Platon Tzouvalis              | 
|President                     | 
|(Principal Executive Officer) | 

---
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

____________

No. 20-5070 September Term, 2019

1:20-cv-00154-UNA

Filed On: August 13, 2020

Raymond Dakim Harris Joiner,

Appellant

v.

United States of America,

Appellee

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

BEFORE: Rogers and Griffith, Circuit Judges, and Sentelle, Senior Circuit 

Judge

J U D G M E N T

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court

for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R. App. P.

34(a)(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s March 9, 2020 order,

dismissing appellant’s complaint without prejudice, be affirmed. The district court

correctly concluded that the complaint failed to set out “a short and plain statement of

the claim showing that [appellant] is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk

is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution

of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App.

P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam

FOR THE COURT:

Mark J. Langer, Clerk 

BY: /s/

Daniel J. Reidy 

Deputy Clerk
<PAGE>

                                     vi

                                                                  EXHIBIT 23.2






                     CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the inclusion of our audit report dated February 14, 
1997, except for the last paragraph of Note 5(A) which is as of March 12, 
1997, Note 2, Note 13 and Note 14(a) which are as of May 14, 1997 and Notes 
14(b), 14(c), 14(d), and 14(e), which are as of June 17, 1997 on the revised 
consolidated financial statements of Turbodyne Technologies Inc. for the 
years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 in the Company's Annual Report on Form 
20F.  We also consent to application of such report to the financial 
information in the Annual Report on Form 20F, when such financial information 
is read in conjunction with the financial statements referred to in our 
report.

Vancouver, Canada
                                                  /s/ Morgan & Company
                                                  Chartered Accountants
July 10, 1998
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 5

- 00 033

- C V



### ____________________

METROPOLITAN PARK MANAGEMENT, LLC AND SUE ANN MA

, Appellant s

V.

SUSAN HYMAN , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 60th District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. B

- 184,614

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The appellants, Metropolitan Park Management, LLC and Sue Ann Ma , and

the appellee, Susan Hyman

, have filed a joint motion to vacate the trial court’s

judgment and jury verdict and dismiss the case by rendering judgment effectuating

the parties’ settlement agreement

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(A). The parties

have informed the Court that they have compromised and settled the entire

controversy without any admission of wrongdoing of any kind. As part of the2 compromise and settlement and by agreement of the parties, appe llants and the

appellee jointly request this Court to: (1) vacate and set aside the judgment of the

trial court; (2) set aside and nullify in its entirety the jury verdict from the trial

court; (3) dismiss a ppellee Susan Hy man’s claims with prejudice; (4) dismiss the

claims against Metropolitan Park Management, LLC and Sue Ann Ma with

prejudice; and (5) find the parties shall bear their own costs. Id.

The joint motion to vacate the trial court’s judgment and jury verdict and

dismiss the case is granted. We vacate the trial court’s judgment, thereby setting

aside the jury verdict in its entirety. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(e). The entire case,

including Susan Hyman’s claims, the claims against Metropolitan Park

Management, LLC , and the claims against Sue Ann Ma , are dismissed with

prejudice. See id. The parties shall, by agreement, bear their own costs. See Tex. R.

App. P. 43.4.

JUDGMENT VACAT ED ; CASE DISMISSED

.

________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Submitted on September 23, 2015

Opinion Delivered September 24, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
# C_2016210EN.01000301.xml

| 11.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7786 — VISA Inc./VISA Europe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 210/05)

On 3 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7786. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7786. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMBINED
AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRENDWEST RESORTS, INC. AND CERTAIN
AFFILIATES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   84,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,935
<INVENTORY>                                     44,534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           9,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,943
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 151,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,742
<OTHER-SE>                                      55,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   151,750
<SALES>                                        128,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               151,587
<CGS>                                           34,569
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,677
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 9,077
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,739
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,197
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,588
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,609
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,609
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
# C_2016243EN.01000101.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 243/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 232, 27.6.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 222, 20.6.2016

OJ C 211, 13.6.2016

OJ C 200, 6.6.2016

OJ C 191, 30.5.2016

OJ C 175, 17.5.2016

OJ C 165, 10.5.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Firearms Training Systems,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment Number 2) for the period ending
March 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John A. Morelli, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                             /s/ John A. Morelli
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             John A. Morelli
                                             Chief Financial Officer
                                             November 6, 2002
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Deltic Timber Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-34317, No. 333-76294, and No. 333-90026) on Form S-8 of Deltic Timber
Corporation of our report dated February 7, 2003, relating to the consolidated
balance sheets of Deltic Timber Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31,
2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders'
equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report
on Form 10-K of Deltic Timber Corporation.

/s/KPMG LLP

KPMG LLP
Shreveport, Louisiana
March 25, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40603

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

WALTER WILMAN MARTINEZ-ARANA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-1844-1

Before JONES, WIENER, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Walter Wilman 

Martinez-Arana has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Martinez-Arana has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 6, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40603 Document: 00513786521 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
No. 16-40603

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40603 Document: 00513786521 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/06/2016
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2915 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2915

 To allow National Flood Insurance Program policyholders who leave the 
 program to purchase a private insurance flood policy to return to the 
    National Flood Insurance Program without penalty, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 30, 2021

  Mr. Scott of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To allow National Flood Insurance Program policyholders who leave the 
 program to purchase a private insurance flood policy to return to the 
    National Flood Insurance Program without penalty, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flood Insurance Consumer Choice Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EFFECT OF PRIVATE FLOOD INSURANCE COVERAGE ON CONTINUOUS 
              COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    Section 1308 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 
4015), is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Effect of Private Flood Insurance Coverage on Continuous 
Coverage Requirements.--For purposes of applying any statutory, 
regulatory, or administrative continuous coverage requirement, 
including under section 1307(g)(1), the Administrator shall consider 
any period during which a property was continuously covered by a flood 
insurance policy through the private market that was used to satisfy 
the requirements under section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection 
Act of 1973 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(a)) to be a period of continuous 
coverage.''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed August 8, 2019 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-19-00109-CV

____________

TAMBRIA LEE, Appellant

V.

CRP RIVERSTONE, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law #4

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 18-CCV-063719

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due July 31, 2019. No brief or motion for extension of 

time has been filed. 

Unless appellant files a brief with this court on or before August 23, 2019, 

the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2732 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2732

  To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain conduct 
          relating to the use of horses for human consumption.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 14, 2021

Mr. Menendez (for himself, Mr. Graham, Mr. Whitehouse, and Ms. Collins) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain conduct 
          relating to the use of horses for human consumption.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``John Stringer Rainey Save America's 
Forgotten Equines Act'' or the ``John Stringer Rainey SAFE Act''.

SEC. 2. SLAUGHTER OF HORSES FOR HUMAN CONSUMPTION.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 50. Slaughter of horses for human consumption
    ``(a) Offense.--It shall be unlawful to knowingly--
            ``(1) possess, ship, transport, purchase, sell, deliver, or 
        receive, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, any 
        horse with the intent that it is to be slaughtered for human 
        consumption; or
            ``(2) possess, ship, transport, purchase, sell, deliver, or 
        receive, in or affecting interstate or foreign commerce, any 
        horse flesh or carcass or part of a carcass, with the intent 
        that it is to be used for human consumption.
    ``(b) Penalty.--Any person who violates subsection (a)--
            ``(1) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more 
        than 2 years, or both; or
            ``(2) in the case of a covered offense, shall be fined 
        under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both.
    ``(c) Definitions.--In this section--
            ``(1) the term `covered offense' means a violation of 
        subsection (a) in which--
                    ``(A) the defendant has no prior conviction under 
                this section; and
                    ``(B) the conduct involves fewer than 5 horses or 
                fewer than 2,000 pounds of horse flesh or carcass or 
                part of a carcass; and
            ``(2) the term `horse' means any member of the family 
        Equidae.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 3 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following:

``50. Slaughter of horses for human consumption.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-7277

TONY HOWARD WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00748-PJM)

Submitted: April 18, 2024 Decided: April 22, 2024

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Howard Williams, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7277 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/22/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Howard Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Williams has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-7277 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/22/2024 Pg: 2 of 2