alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-11373

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

SIDNEY RAY WILLIAMS,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

No. 3:19-CR-159-1

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sidney Williams is charged with possession of a firearm by a convicted 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 

5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

January 24, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-11373 Document: 00515284866 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/24/2020
No. 19-11373

2

felon and possession of ammunition by a convicted felon, in violation of 

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). He appeals an order denying his motion to revoke a

pretrial detention order.

“Absent an error of law,” we uphold a pretrial-detention order “if it is 

supported by the proceedings below, a deferential standard of review that we 

equate to the abuse-of-discretion standard.” United States v. Rueben, 974 F.2d 

580, 586 (5th Cir. 1992) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The 

proceedings in the district court support its conclusion that no condition or

combination of conditions will reasonably assure the safety of the community 

based on the nature and circumstances of the offenses charged, Williams’s history and characteristics, and the nature and seriousness of the danger that his 

release would pose. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(g).

The order denying revocation is AFFIRMED.

 Case: 19-11373 Document: 00515284866 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/24/2020
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2945 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2945

    To include sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence in the 
definition of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality 
   Act in order to expedite the removal of aliens convicted of such 
                                crimes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 6, 2021

   Ms. Ernst (for herself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Tillis, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
Cramer, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Cotton, Mr. 
 Lankford, Mr. Lee, Ms. Lummis, Mr. Portman, Mr. Hoeven, Mrs. Capito, 
 and Mr. Boozman) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
             and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To include sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence in the 
definition of aggravated felonies under the Immigration and Nationality 
   Act in order to expedite the removal of aliens convicted of such 
                                crimes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLES.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Better Enforcement of Grievous 
Offenses by unNaturalized Emigrants'' or the ``BE GONE Act''.

SEC. 2. EXPANDING THE DEFINITION OF AGGRAVATED FELONIES UNDER THE 
              IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY ACT.

    Section 101(a)(43) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1101(a)(43)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (T), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (U), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(V) sexual assault and aggravated sexual violence.''.
                                 <all>
```
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2903 

To require the Secretary of Defense to establish executive education activities 

on emerging technologies for appropriate general and flag officers and 

senior executive-level civilian leaders, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 

Mr. ROUNDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense to establish executive 

education activities on emerging technologies for appropriate general and flag officers and senior executivelevel civilian leaders, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emerging Technologies 

5 Professional Military Education Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2903 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXECUTIVE EDUCATION ON EMERGING TECH2 NOLOGIES FOR SENIOR CIVILIAN AND MILI3 TARY LEADERS. 

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF COURSE.—Not later than 

5 two years after the date of the enactment of this Act, the 

6 Secretary of Defense shall establish executive education 

7 activities on emerging technologies for appropriate general 

8 and flag officers and senior executive-level civilian leaders 

9 that are designed specifically to prepare new general and 

10 flag officers and senior executive-level civilian leaders on 

11 relevant technologies and how these technologies may be 

12 applied to military and business activities in the Depart13 ment of Defense. 

14 (b) PLAN FOR PARTICIPATION.— 

15 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense 

16 shall develop a plan for participation in executive 

17 education activities established under subsection (a). 

18 (2) REQUIREMENTS.—As part of such plan, the 

19 Secretary shall ensure that, not later than five years 

20 after the date of the establishment of the activities 

21 under subsection (a), all appropriate general flag of22 ficers and senior executive-level civilian leaders are— 

23 (A) required to complete the executive edu24 cation activities under such subsection; and 

25 (B) certified as having successfully com26 pleted the executive education activities. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2903 IS

1 (c) REPORT.— 

2 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than the date that 

3 is three years after the date of the enactment of this 

4 Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the 

5 Committee on Armed Services of the Senate and the 

6 Committee on Armed Services of the House of Rep7 resentatives a report on the status of the implemen8 tation of the activities required by subsection (a). 

9 (2) CONTENTS.—The report submitted under 

10 paragraph (1) shall include the following: 

11 (A) A description of the new general and 

12 flag officers and senior executive-level civilian 

13 leaders for whom the education activities have 

14 been designated. 

15 (B) A recommendation with respect to con16 tinuing or expanding the activities required 

17 under subsection (a). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)


         In connection  with the  accompanying  Annual Report of Radale Imports,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form  10-KSB for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2006
(the "Report"), I, Lee D. Dodson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. ss.78o(d)); and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  June 27, 2006
                                                      /s/ Lee D. Dodson
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Lee D. Dodson
                                                     Chief Financial Officer


         The above  certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  ss.1350)  and is not being filed as
part of the Form 10-KSB or as a separate disclosure document.
<PAGE>   1

                                                              EXHIBIT 10.9


                     FAMOUS DAVE'S OF MINNEAPOLIS, INC.

                                AMENDMENT TO
                            1995 STOCK OPTION AND
                              COMPENSATION PLAN



     1.   Increase in Number of Shares Subject to the Plan.  Section 5.1 of the
1995 Stock Option and Compensation Plan is hereby amended to read in its
entirety as follows:

          5.1 Number of Shares.   Subject to adjustment as provided in
      Section 11.6, the number of shares of Common Stock which may be
      issued under the Plan shall not exceed 900,000 shares of Common
      Stock.

      2.  Effective Date.  This Amendment will become effective upon approval
thereof by the shareholders of the Company at the next annual meeting of
shareholders.
### AW: AW: Clarification Requested on two items associ ated with

Airbus Petition for Exemption

from: Koenig, Michael

to:
Mark Forseth

10/18/2010 03:28 AM

Dear Mr. Forseth,

Thank you for your quick reply after the submission of the additional information.

The content of my e-mail is not confidential and I permit that you upload the text to the

Federal docket.

We do however consider both attached .pdf files as Airbus proprietary information and do not permit to upload it to the Federal docket. Y ou may preface the text of my e-mail accordingly.

Thank you again for your fast response!

Michael König

Dr. Michael König Product Integrity - EAAC2 Certification Manager ATA 21, 38 Airbus Operations GmbH Kreetslag 10 D-21129 Hamburg (Germany)

Phone: +49 40 743 80285

Fax: +49 40 743 76489

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Mark.Forseth@faa.gov [mailto:Mark.Forseth@faa. gov] Gesendet: Freitag, 15. Oktober 2010 20:15 An: Koenig, Michael Cc: BERRONDO, Sophie; Stephen.Happenny@faa.gov; Tim .Backman@faa.gov Betreff: Re: AW: Clarification Requested on two ite ms associated with Airbus Petition for ExemptionMr. Koenig,

Thank you for your timely reply to our request for more information regarding an exemption for Airbus Model A350 XWB airplanes.

Please note that your e-mail correspondence to us i ncludes a boilerplate disclaimer stating, among other things, that “The information in this e-mail is confidential. The contents may not be disclosed or used by anyone oth er than the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else is unauthorised.”

The FAA would like to publish, in the Federal docke t (a.k.a. public docket), the text of the e-mail you wrote, in large part as a public rec ord of your reply to us (required by US regulations). Also, if either or both of the PDF fi les you attached are confidential and/or proprietary, please advise us so that we do NOT upl oad these to the public docket. We may preface the text of your e-mail, as we intend t o upload it to the Federal Docket, to make general mention of Airbus proprietary files we received.

With your permission, and assuming none of the text you wrote in your e-mail is confidential, we will upload that text to Federal d ocket no. FAA-2010-0766 (located in www.regulations.gov). We will also upload attachmen ts only if they are not considered

Airbus confidential.

Please advise.

Feel free to contact me if you need clarification r egarding this e-mail. Otherwise, we await your reply.

Best regards,

Mark Forseth Regulatory Technical Writer-Editor, ANM-113

Standardization Branch Transport Airplane Directorate

Federal Aviation Administration

1601 Lind Ave. SW Renton, WA 98057 ph: 425-227-2796
# C_2016160EN.01000101.xml

| 4.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 May 2016

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 May 2016

(2016/C 160/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1569 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4424 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79103 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2305 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0977 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3090 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,037 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3844 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4879 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2718 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5303 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4559 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9769 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6572 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5574 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 323,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7316 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5013 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5100 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 276,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5735 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,425 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,9498 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,422 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1020 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,1460 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,8128 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1569

JPY

Japanese yen

122,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4424

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79103

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2305

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0977

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3090

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,037

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3844

RON

Romanian leu

4,4879

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2718

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5303

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4559

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9769

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6572

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5574

KRW

South Korean won

1 323,75

ZAR

South African rand

16,7316

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5013

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5100

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 276,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5735

PHP

Philippine peso

54,425

RUB

Russian rouble

76,9498

THB

Thai baht

40,422

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1020

MXN

Mexican peso

20,1460

INR

Indian rupee

76,8128

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40552

Summary Calendar

JAMES DINKINS,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:14-CV-339

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge:*

James Dinkins was convicted in the District of Maryland in 2009 of 

conspiracy to distribute narcotics under 21 U.S.C. § 846; murder with intent to 

prevent attendance and testimony in an official proceeding and prevent 

communication of information about a federal offense to law enforcement 

under 18 U.S.C. §§ 1512(a)(1)(A) and (C); use of a firearm to further a drugtrafficking crime under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(iii); and willfully causing the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 30, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 15-40552 Document: 00513574294 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2016
No. 15-40552

death of a person through use of a firearm in furtherance of a drug-trafficking 

crime under § 924(j). He sought 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief in 2013, but was 

denied. He instituted this case under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge his 

convictions and sentences.

In his current appeal, Dinkins asserts that two cases—Arthur Anderson 

LLP v. United States, 544 U.S. 696 (2005), and Fowler v. United States, 563 

U.S. 668 (2011)—establish that the conduct for which he was convicted was 

not criminal. Those decisions predated his § 2255 motion and therefore may 

not be urged in a § 2241 challenge in connection with the § 2255(e) savings 

clause, which requires, among other things, that the petitioner’s claim was 

foreclosed by circuit law when it should have been raised in the petitioner’s 

trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion. See Garland v. Roy, 615 F.3d 391, 394 (5th 

Cir. 2010). And to the extent that Dinkins may be understood to persist in a 

claim of factual, rather than legal, innocence, he fails to show that factual 

innocence creates an exception to the requirements for challenging a conviction 

and sentence in a § 2241 petition. See § 2255(e); Garland, 615 F.3d at 394.

The district court did not error by concluding that § 2241 relief was 

unavailable to Dinkins, see Jeffers v. Chandler, 253 F.3d 827, 831 (5th Cir. 

2001), and dismissing his § 2241 petition.

AFFIRMED.

2

 Case: 15-40552 Document: 00513574294 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2016
# C_2014167EN.01000202.xml

| 4.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7210 — Groupe Soufflet/Groupe Neuhauser)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 167/03

On 27 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7210. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7210. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2006, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gregory A. Ton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that: 

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: June 28, 2006
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronavan Mohling, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/Ronavan MohlingRonavan Mohling Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer June 27, 2003
Order filed, December 1, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00851-CV

____________

NEW FAITH CHURCH OF HOUSTON, Appellant

V.

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE D/B/A AT&T OF TEXAS, INC., 

ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-38636

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 21, 2016. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Sheri Ullrich, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
\ . . UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N OFFIC E O FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D.C .

I N TH E MATTERO F CARLIL E TRANSPORTATIO N SYSTEM S FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10AL000 3 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) DM S NO . [•AA-20IO-078' ) 3

~ 

## u i- o CT J m-'-i m _LJ--J:~ ' 

## 5g' ^ C O

WITHDRAWA L O FCOMPLAIN T I n accordanc e wit

h § 13.21 5 o f

th e Rule s o f

Practic e i

n FA A Civi l Penalt

y Actions , 1 4 C.F.R . par

t 13 , subpar

t G , th e Complainant , throug h counsel , hereb y withdraw s th e complain t i n thi s matter , andrequest s tha t thes e proceeding s b e terminate dwit h prejudice . Respectfull y submitte dthis th e 2"' ' da y o f Novembe r

2011 . HOWARD L . MARTIN , J R Regiona l Counse l

Bv:^

- 

## Q Glenn H . Brown Senio r Attorne yCERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

Re : Carlil e Transportatio n System s FA A Cas e No . 2010AL700I2 9 FA A Docke t No . CP10AL000 3 I hereb y certif

y tha t o n thi s dat e I serve dacop y o f th e Withdrawal o f

Complain t

b y facsimil e transmissio n a s indicate dandb y placin g i

t i n the Unite dState s Mail , postage-prepaid , certifie d mail , retur

n receip t requested , addresse da s follows : Th e Honorabl e RichardC . Goodwi n Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 Ll.S^Pep_ai1men

t o f Transportatio n _^. ^ ^ ^ . _,_^

^ 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 FAX ; (202)366-753 6 Roy L . Longacre , Esq . Longacre La

w Offices , Lid . 42 5 G Street , Suit e 91 0 Anchorage , A

K 9950 1 FAX : (907)279-468 5 I furthe r certif y tha t o n thi s dat e 1 hav e serve dthe original an don e cop y o f the Withdrawal o f Complain t

b y postage-prepaid , certifie dmail , retur n receip t requested , addresse da s follows : Hearin g Docke t Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue . SW . Washington , D C 2059 1 ATTN : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wright Building-Suit e 2Wl00 0

Ud,^ ^ Offic e o f th e Regional Counse l FA A Alaska n Regio n 22 2 Wes t 7t h Avenu e #1 4 Anchorage , Alask a99513-758 7



# a^U^a ^ ^Ai^^^JP O