alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 March 2 5, 2020

t0324

Order 

Clerk

March 25, 2020

159791

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159791

COA: 348186

Allegan CC: 17-021004-FC

MICHAEL EDWARD REESE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of December 30, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer 

the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On 

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is 

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, 

we REMAND this case to the Allegan Circuit Court for correction of the judgment of 

sentence. The prosecuting attorney has conceded that the defendant’s 200-month 

minimum sentence violates the two-thirds rule of People v Tanner, 387 Mich 683, 690 

(1972), and MCL 769.34(2)(b). Under that rule, because the statutory maximum for 

third-degree criminal sexual conduct, see MCL 750.520d(2), as elevated by the habitual 

offender statute, MCL 769.10(1)(a), is 270 months, the longest minimum sentence that 

the defendant could receive is 180 months, or 15 years. The judgment of sentence is to 

be amended accordingly. We further ORDER the trial court to ensure that the corrected 

judgment of sentence is transmitted to the Department of Corrections. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Collection Activity

Number of 

Respondents

Number of 

Responses 

per Party

Total 

Number of 

Responses

Time per 

Response

Cost per 

Response 

(Dollars) Total Hours

Total Cost 

(Dollars)

80.1450 - Registration

(a) at $103/hour 500 1 500 8 824 4000 412000

CDX Registration 500 1 500 2 206 1000 103000

TOTALS 1000 1000 5000 515000

Information Collection Burden by Type of Party

Table III - "Obligated Parties" (Including Refiners and Exporters or Renewable Fuels) [Assumes 150 refiners and 100 exporters.]
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 
  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Online Innovation,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003
  as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Marlene
  C. Schluter, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operations of the Company.

|Date:                                                            | February 12, 2004 | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | 
|                                                                 |                   | 
|/s/ Marlene C. Schluter                                          |                  
|Marlene C. Schluter, Director,
      Principal Financial Officer |                  

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 27, 2010

p0419 

# Order

April 27, 2010

140318

SUZANNE M. ZAPCZYNSKI, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 140318 COA: 285982 Macomb CC: 2 007-000359-DO NORMAN F. ZAPCZYNSKI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the November 24, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT BY


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Ed
Bailey, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting of LightTouch Vein
& Laser, Inc.. (“the Registrant”) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge, based upon the review of the Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):





(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
result of operations of the Company.








Date:
      August 28,  2008
            /s/ Ed
      Bailey


Ed
      Bailey


Chief
      Executive Officer


And
      Principal Accounting Officer











* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Tanir Horn, as Chief Financial Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 29, 2011
By:  /s/ Tanir Horn

Tanir Horn

Chief Financial Officer of the Company
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58 QPM# AIR-ANM-D30-F7 Date: December 17,2008 Revision 1 

## Record ofContacts 

# FDMS Docket No.

# FAA.JPIf!-- 

# 0"76,/ With whom outside the FAA hasthis proposal been discussed (e.lg., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)? , Orgapization Person !contacted Date Boeing John Hamilton I 10/14/08 ATA Mark Lopez I 1l/23/09 I


# ,

UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED Check the Master List to Verify That This isthe Correct Revision Before Use
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, December 05, 2023.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, December 05, 2023

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A24D0155. RESIDE PARTNERS, LLC et al v. GWINNETT COUNTY, GEORGIA et al.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

23A04102
EXHIBIT 21.1

List of Subsidiaries of the SPG Operating Partnership

|Subsidiary                                 |  | Jurisdiction 
|------------------------------------------ |  | -------------
|The Retail Property Trust                  |  | Massachusetts
|Simon Property Group (Illinois), L.P.      |  | Illinois     
|Simon Property Group (Texas), L.P.         |  | Texas        
|Shopping Center Associates                 |  | New York     
|DeBartolo Capital Partnership              |  | Delaware     
|Simon Capital Limited Partnership          |  | Delaware     
|SDG Macerich Properties, L.P.              |  | Delaware     
|M.S. Management Associates, Inc.           |  | Delaware     
|M.S. Management Associates (Indiana), Inc. |  | Indiana      
|DeBartolo Properties Management, Inc.      |  | Ohio         
|Mayflower Realty LLC                       |  | Delaware     
|Rosewood Indemnity, Ltd.                   |  | Bermuda      

Omits
names of subsidiaries which as of December 31, 2001 were not, in the aggregate, a "significant subsidiary".

95

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


         We have issued our report dated February 1, 2002, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of
ONTRACK Data International Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of ONTRACK Data International Inc. on Forms S-8 (File
No. 333-18969, effective December 10, 1996, File No. 333-87873, effective
September 27, 1999 and File No. 333-42496, effective July 28, 2000) and on Form
S-3 (File No. 333-87871, effective October 6, 1999).


                                 /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 27, 2002
Swanson, Brian COST) 

From: Susan Pulitzer [principessa327@yahoo.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 24,201011 :16 AM 

To: dennisdevany@dot.gov;.Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Subject: Cape Air /Colgan Air at Plattsburgh 

Gentlemen: 

Please allow me to add my voice to Andrew Schonbek's and to those who are encouraging you NOT to 

replace Cape Air with Colgan Air at this time. 

I have children (working professionals) who live in Boston and have had occasion to use Cape Air. Both 

have found Cape Air to be an excellent carrier operated by very capable personnel. Although we all would 

prefer to be flying in larger planes, such a move could be considered an upgrade ONLY if safety and service 

were equal and it appears that, at this point, they are not. It doesn't make sense to abandon a carrier with a 

proven record and commitment to Plattsburgh for one with a less than stellar safety record and vague 

guarantees. 

I urge youto advise the legislators to exercise patience. At some point in the future, Plattsburgh will be well 

positioned to graduate to larger planes with the full support of the community. NTSB and FAA reforms will 

havehad time to be implemented. The.Montreal market will still be there. In the meantime, I would encourage 

you to consider the old adages: "Safety First" and "Timing is Everything". In the long term, 

Plattsburgh Airport and the local economy will be the winner. 

Sincerely, 

Susan Pulitzer 

1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLCO956000 L14400000.BJ0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plats of Survey; Colorado.

# SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Colorado State Office is publishing this notice to inform the public of the intent to officially file the survey plat listed below and afford a proper period of time to protest this action prior to the plat filing. During this time, the plat will be available for review in the BLM Colorado State Office.

# DATES:

Unless there are protests of this action, the filing of the plat described in this notice will happen on April 27, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

BLM Colorado State Office, Cadastral Survey, 2850 Youngfield Street, Lakewood, CO 80215-7093.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Randy Bloom, Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado, (303) 239-3856.

Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week, to leave a message or question with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal business hours.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The plat incorporating the field notes of the dependent resurvey in Township 13 South, Range 69 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Colorado, was accepted on March 11, 2015.

Randy Bloom,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor for Colorado.

[FR Doc. 2015-06911 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4310-JB-P
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21




                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  State of              Percentage
                                                                  Incorporation         Ownership

<S>                                                               <C>                   <C> 
Pinnacle Bank (1)                                                 Alabama               100%
First General Service(s) Corporation (2)                          Alabama               100%
First General Ventures Corporation (2)                            Alabama               100%

Affiliate
First General Lending Corporation
   (accounted for on the cost method) (2)                         Alabama               40%
</TABLE>


---------------------------
(1)  Subsidiary of the Registrant.
(2)  Subsidiary of Pinnacle Bank.
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Rajesh Raniga, Chief Financial Officer of EYI Industries,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i)	the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for
the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004, and to which this
certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)	the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

By:

/s/ Rajesh Raniga
Name:
Rajesh Raniga

Title:
Chief Financial Officer

Date:

May  20 , 2005


A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates,
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and
is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company
under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-QSB),
irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in
such filing.
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**




**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**




Board
      of
      Directors


NeoMedia
      Technologies, Inc.




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference to the previously filed Registration
      Statements (File Nos.333-33738, 333-36098, 333-42477, 333-85422, 333-99183,
      333-101588, 333-103172, 333-107239, 333-109778, 333-110189, 333-110329,
      333-114123, and 333-137227) of our report dated April 2, 2007 (which report
      expressed an unqualified opinion and included an explanatory paragraph that
      raised substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going
      concern), relating to the consolidated financial statements of NeoMedia
      Technologies, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006, which appear
      in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





/s/
      Stonefield Josephson, Inc.


Certified
      Public Accountants


Los
      Angeles, California


March
      27,
      2008
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mikel H. Williams, President and Chief Executive Officer of DDi Corp. (the Company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company for the period covered by the Report.

/s/ MIKEL H. WILLIAMSMikel H. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: October 29, 2008
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

EBONIC BELL,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 337, 2016

§

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 141108472

§ 

§

§

Submitted: November 17, 2016

Decided: December 6, 2016

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; HOLLAND and SEITZ, Justices.

O R D E R

This 6th day of December 2016, upon consideration of the appellant’s 

Supreme Court Rule 26(c) brief, the State’s response, and the record below, it 

appears to the Court that: 

(1) After a June 9, 2016 bench trial, the appellant, Ebonic Bell, was found 

guilty of two counts of Illegal Possession of a Non-Controlled Prescription Drug 

and one count of Possession of a Controlled Substance. For each count of Illegal 

Possession of a Non-Controlled Prescription Drug, Bell was sentenced to six 

months of Level V incarceration, suspended for one year of Level II probation.

For Possession of a Controlled Substance, Bell was sentenced to one year of Level 
2

V incarceration, suspended for one year of Level II probation. This is Bell’s direct 

appeal. 

(2) On appeal, Bell’s counsel (“Counsel”) filed a brief and a motion to 

withdraw under Supreme Court Rule 26(c). Counsel asserts that, based upon a 

complete and careful examination of the record, there are no arguably appealable 

issues. Counsel informed Bell of the provisions of Rule 26(c) and provided Bell

with a copy of the motion to withdraw and the accompanying brief. 

(3) Counsel also informed Bell of her right to identify any points she 

wished this Court to consider on appeal. Bell has not raised any issues for this 

Court’s consideration. The State has responded to the Rule 26(c) brief and has 

moved to affirm the Superior Court’s judgment. 

(4) When reviewing a motion to withdraw and an accompanying brief

under Rule 26(c), this Court must: (i) be satisfied that defense counsel has made a 

conscientious examination of the record and the law for arguable claims; and (ii) 

conduct its own review of the record and determine whether the appeal is so totally 

devoid of at least arguably appealable issues that it can be decided without an 

adversary presentation.

1

(5) This Court has reviewed the record carefully and has concluded that 

Bell’s appeal is wholly without merit and devoid of any arguably appealable issue. 

 

1

Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988); Leacock v. State, 690 A.2d 926, 927-28 (Del. 1996).
3

We also are satisfied that Bell’s counsel has made a conscientious effort to 

examine the record and the law and has properly determined that Bell could not 

raise a meritorious claim in this appeal. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. The motion to withdraw is moot.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
Exhibit
32.01




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sangui Biotech International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Thomas Striepe, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Joachim Fleing, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Dated: February 23,
2009    /s/
Thomas Striepe


__________________________________________


By:
Thomas Striepe


Chief
Executive Officer






Dated: February 23, 2009
   /s/
Joachim Fleing
 __________________________________________
 By:
Joachim Fleing
 Chief
Financial Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00542-CV

Mason Castillo

v.

City of Edinburg, Texas and The University of Texas - Pan American

On appeal from the

398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-6654-13-I

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 1, 2016