alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-4372

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERMAINE TERRELL STRANGE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Terrence W. Boyle,

District Judge. (5:95-cr-00083-BO-11)

Submitted: November 30, 2007 Decided: December 21, 2007

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, G. Alan DuBois,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. George E. B. Holding, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Banumathi Rangarajan, Assistant United States Attorneys,

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Terrell Strange appeals from his forty-fivemonth sentence for violating his supervised release. On appeal, he

argues that his sentence is unreasonable. For the reasons that

follow, we affirm.

We will affirm a sentence imposed after revocation of

supervised release if it is within the prescribed statutory range

and is not plainly unreasonable. United States v. Crudup, 461 F.3d

433, 437 (4th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, 127 S. Ct. 1813 (2007).

Here, it is uncontested that Strange sold crack cocaine on three

occasions within one year of his release from confinement and that

the district court sentenced Strange within his properly-calculated

advisory sentencing range of 37-46 months. (J.A. 23). See U.S.

Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 7B1.4(a) (2006). Under these

circumstances, we do not find that the district court’s sentence

was plainly unreasonable. Crudup, 461 F.3d at 437; see Rita v.

United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2469 (2007) (noting that “[w]here

a [sentencing] matter is . . . conceptually simple” and the record

makes clear that the sentencing judge considered the evidence and

arguments “we do not believe the law requires the judge to write

more extensively.”). 

Accordingly, we affirm Strange’s sentence. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
- 3 -

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

 AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2019 MARIA LOURDES BARBARA FLORES, a/k/a Maria Lourdes Barbara Fury, Petitioner, versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, United States Attorney General, Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A97-346-529) Submitted: May 30, 2007 Decided: July 2, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jon Eric Garde, LAW OFFICES OF JON ERIC GARDE, Las Vegas, Nevada, for Appellant. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General, James A. Hunolt, Senior Litigation Counsel, Stacey I. Young, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Maria Lourdes Barbara Flores, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) order denying relief from removal. Flores asserts that the IJ abused her discretion in denying Flores’ motion to continue for adjudication of an I-130 petition for adjustment of status. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion in the IJ’s re fusal to grant a continuance. See8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (2006); Onyeme v. INS , 146 F.3d 227, 231 (4th Cir. 1998). The remaining claims set forth in Flores’ brief were not raised before the Board of Immigration Appeals. As such, they have not been administratively exhausted and we lack jurisdiction to review them. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2000). With regard to Flores’ ineffective assistance of counsel claim, we note that she has also failed to comply with the requirements of Matter of Lozada , 19 I. & N. Dec. 637 (B.I.A. 1988). We accordingly deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

No. 15-1491 

IN RE: ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION 

JOSEPH BRADLEY; PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS; CITY 

OF FORT LAUDERDALE POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM; AUTOMOTIVE 

INDUSTRIES PENSION TRUST FUND; WILLIAM A. GAUL, D.M.D., 

Plaintiffs, Appellants, 

NABIL ELMACHTOUB, individually and on behalf of all others 

similarly situated; JAMES L. BURCH, individually and on behalf 

of all others similarly situated; GREATER PENNSYLVANIA 

CARPENTERS' PENSION FUND, individually and on behalf of all 

others similarly situated; JIMMY WANG, individually and on 

behalf of all others similarly situated, 

Plaintiffs, 

v. 

ARIAD PHARMACEUTICALS, INC; HARVEY J. BERGER; FRANK G. HALUSKA; 

TIMOTHY P. CLACKSON; EDWARD M. FITZGERALD; JEFFERIES & COMPANY, 

INC.; WAYNE WILSON; JAY R. LAMARCHE; BMO CAPITAL MARKETS CORP.; 

ATHANASE LAVIDAS; COWEN AND COMPANY, LLC; RBC CAPITAL MARKETS, 

LLC; JP MORGAN SECURITIES LLC; LEERINK SWANN LLC; NORBERT G. 

RIEDEL; MASSIMO RADAELLI; ROBERT M. WHELAN, JR.; UBS SECURITIES 

LLC, 

Defendants, Appellees, 

DAVID E. I. PYOTT; MIKE R. BOWLIN; JOHN T. CARDIS; WESLEY W. 

VONSCHACK; ROBERT A. INGRAM; WILLIAM J. LINK; MICHAEL A. 

MUSSALLEM; BARBARA J. MCNEIL, 

Defendants. 

ERRATA SHEET

 The opinion of this Court, issued on November 28, 2016, is 

amended as follows: 

 On page 7, line 6, insert "a" after "state"
-79.5 -79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

38.5 39.0 39.5 40.0



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
MECHEAL HENDRIX,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3870

Opinion filed December 6, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Mecheal Hendrix, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 

807 So. 2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). 

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/02

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
Company Confidential & Proprietary

Acronyms:

&$5 –&RUUHFWLYH $FWLRQ 5HSRUW

&&9 –&RQWLQXLQJ &DOLEUDWLRQ 9HULILFDWLRQ

&) –&DOLEUDWLRQ )DFWRU

&)5 –&RGH RI )HGHUDO 5HJXODWLRQV

&2& –&KDLQ RI &XVWRG\

&56 –&KDQJH 5HTXHVW )RUP

'/ –'HWHFWLRQ /LPLW

'/&. –'HWHFWLRQ /LPLW &KHFN 6WDQGDUG

'2& –'HPRQVWUDWLRQ RI &DSDELOLW\

'42 –'DWD 4XDOLW\ 2EMHFWLYHV

'8 –'XSOLFDWH

(+6 –(QYLURQPHQW +HDOWK DQG 6DIHW\

(3$ –(QYLURQPHQWDO 3URWHFWLRQ $JHQF\

*&  *DV &KURPDWRJUDSK\

*&06  *DV &KURPDWRJUDSK\0DVV 6SHFWURPHWU\

+3/&  +LJK 3HUIRUPDQFH /LTXLG &KURPDWRJUDSK\

,&3  ,QGXFWLYHO\ &RXSOHG 3ODVPD $WRPLF (PLVVLRQ 6SHFWURVFRS\

,&9 –,QLWLDO &DOLEUDWLRQ 9HULILFDWLRQ

,'/ –,QVWUXPHQW 'HWHFWLRQ /LPLW

,+ –,QGXVWULDO +\JLHQH

,6 –,QWHUQDO 6WDQGDUG

/&6 –/DERUDWRU\ &RQWURO 6DPSOH

/&6' –/DERUDWRU\ &RQWURO 6DPSOH 'XSOLFDWH

/2' –/LPLW RI 'HWHFWLRQ

/24 –/LPLW RI 4XDQWLWDWLRQ

/,06 –/DERUDWRU\ ,QIRUPDWLRQ 0DQDJHPHQW 6\VWHP

0'/ –0HWKRG 'HWHFWLRQ /LPLW

0'/&. –0'/ &KHFN 6WDQGDUG

0'/9 –0'/ 9HULILFDWLRQ &KHFN 6WDQGDUG

05/ –0HWKRG 5HSRUWLQJ /LPLW &KHFN 6WDQGDUG

06 –0DWUL[ 6SLNH

06' –0DWUL[ 6SLNH 'XSOLFDWH

06'6  0DWHULDO 6DIHW\ 'DWD 6KHHW

1&0 –1RQ&RQIRUPDQFH 0HPR

1(/$&  1DWLRQDO (QYLURQPHQWDO /DERUDWRU\ $FFUHGLWDWLRQ &RQIHUHQFH

1(/$3  1DWLRQDO (QYLURQPHQWDO /DERUDWRU\ $FFUHGLWDWLRQ 3URJUDP

37 –3HUIRUPDQFH 7HVWLQJ

4$0 –4XDOLW\ $VVXUDQFH 0DQXDO

4$4& –4XDOLW\ $VVXUDQFH  4XDOLW\ &RQWURO

4$33 –4XDOLW\ $VVXUDQFH 3URMHFW 3ODQ

5) –5HVSRQVH )DFWRU

53' –5HODWLYH 3HUFHQW 'LIIHUHQFH

56' –5HODWLYH 6WDQGDUG 'HYLDWLRQ

6' –6HULDO 'LOXWLRQ

623 6WDQGDUG 2SHUDWLQJ 3URFHGXUH

7$7 –7XUQ$URXQG7LPH

92$ –9RODWLOHV

92& –9RODWLOH 2UJDQLF &RPSRXQG
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2886 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to authorize the donation and distribution of capes, horns, and antlers from wildlife management activities 

carried out on National Park System land. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2021 

Mr. BARRASSO introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to authorize the 

donation and distribution of capes, horns, and antlers 

from wildlife management activities carried out on National Park System land. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cape and Antler Pres5 ervation Enhancement Act’’ or the ‘‘CAPE Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2886 IS

1 SEC. 2. DONATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF MEAT, CAPES, 

2 HORNS, AND ANTLERS FROM WILDLIFE MAN3 AGEMENT ACTIVITIES ON NATIONAL PARK 

4 SYSTEM LAND. 

5 Section 104909(c) of title 54, United States Code, 

6 is amended— 

7 (1) by inserting ‘‘, capes, hides, horns, and ant8 lers’’ after ‘‘distribution of meat’’; 

9 (2) by striking ‘‘food banks, and other organi10 zations’’ and inserting ‘‘and, in the case of meat, 

11 food banks and other organizations’’; and 

12 (3) by inserting ‘‘, including giving priority con13 sideration to qualified volunteers that participated in 

14 the wildlife management activity’’ after ‘‘may re15 quire’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 99.1

                         NATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Annual Report of National  Scientific  Corporation  (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael A. Grollman,  President and Chief Executive  Officer and Chairman of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael A. Grollman
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Michael A. Grollman
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman
January 1, 2003


/s/ Lou L. Ross
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lou L. Ross
Chairman-Emeritus of the Board
January 1, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 10.39
 WAIVER AND SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED
LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT
 Agent Midway Borrower Borrowers Parent MGW MI MSC MHS Surreal U.S. Credit Party U.S. Credit Parties
 Loan Agreement
 Potential Event of Default
    Defined Terms
 Waiver




---



##### 



Amendments to Loan Agreement
  Ratification
 Conditions to Effectiveness
     Miscellaneous
 Warranties and Absence of Defaults
 -2-




---



##### 



Expenses
 Governing Law
 Counterparts
 Release.
   -3-




---



##### 



-4-




---



##### 



MIDWAY HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC.,a Delaware corporationMIDWAY AMUSEMENT GAMES, LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyMIDWAY GAMES INC.,a Delaware corporationMIDWAY GAMES WEST INC.,a California corporationMIDWAY INTERACTIVE INC.,a Delaware corporationMIDWAY SALES COMPANY, LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyMIDWAY HOME STUDIOS INC.,a Delaware corporationSURREAL SOFTWARE INC.,a Washington corporationMIDWAY STUDIOS  AUSTIN INC.,a Texas corporationMIDWAY STUDIOS  LOS ANGELES INC.,a California corporationEach By /s/ Thomas E. PowellTitle Executive Vice President  Finance, Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



WELLS FARGO FOOTHILL, INC.,a California corporation, as Agent, as UK Security Trustee and as a LenderBy /s/ John LeonardTitle SVP
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report on From 10-KSB
of Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc. (the "Company") for the Year Ended June
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Amendment"), I, Richard Secord, Acting Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Amendment fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ Richard Secord


Richard Secord
Acting Chief Financial Officer
October 11, 2004

         This certification accompanies the Amendment pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or it staff upon request.
E.O. 12866 Meeting on EPA's EGU MACT Rule 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: RobertJ Wayland 

 03/07/2011 05:15 PM 

 Cc: Karen Thundiyil, Charlotte Bertrand, Bill Maxwell, Mary Johnson 

2 Attachments 

Mar7_2011_CERES_Handout1.pdf Mar7_2011_CERES_Handout2.pdf 

Hi Bob,

Consistent with  our EOs, attached are the handouts from the meeting today.

Regards,

Cortney

-----Original Appointment-----

When: Monday, March 07, 2011 1:30 PM‐2:00 PM (UTC‐05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: 10103 NEOB

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect daylight saving time adjustments.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Angela Bonarrigo, Ceres has requested this meeting.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 14, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director, Applications and Enforcement) 101 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105-1579:

1. *Territorial Savings Bank Employee Stock Ownership Trust and Trustees David Murakami and Richard Murakami,* all of Honolulu, Hawaii; to acquire additional voting shares of Territorial Bancorp, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of Territorial Savings Bank, both in Honolulu, Hawaii.

      ( print page 16683)    
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 25, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-07159 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San A ntonio, Texas

May 21, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00128

- CV

Rajah JEFFERS, Appellant

v.

HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Appellee

From the County Court At Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV00800

The Honorable John Francis Davis , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due May 3, 2019

. Neither the brief nor a motion for extension of

time has been filed.

We therefore ORDER appellant to file, on or before May 31, 2019

, his appellant’s brief and a written response reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief. If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a).

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed t he seal of the said

court on this 21st day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
# C_2015232EN.01000701.xml

| 16.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 232/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Luxembourg

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 125th anniversary of the House of Nassau-Weilburg

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : On the left of the coin is the effigy of His Royal Highness Grand Duke Henri, and on the right, in a circular arrangement, and in chronological order of their accession to the throne, the portraits of their Royal Highnesses Grand Dukes Adolphe and Guillaume IV, Grand Duchesses Marie-Adélaïde and Charlotte, and Grand Duke Jean. To the right, also in circular format, is the inscription ‘1890 - Dynastie Nassau-Weilbourg’. The name of the issuing country, ‘Luxembourg’, and the year, ‘2015’, run vertically in the centre of the design.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 1,4 million

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : August 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2016023EN.01000201.xml

| 22.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7872 — Novartis/GSK (Ofatumumab Autoimmune Indications))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 23/03)

On 18 December 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7872. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7872. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDRE KHALEEL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE 

INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-196

[February 11, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Mardi Levey-Cohen and Kim Theresa Mollica, Judges; 

L.T. Case Nos. 062016CC021628AXXXCE and 

062017AP021618AXCCCE.

Mariano R. Gonzalez of Law Offices of Gonzalez & Associates, P.A., 

Miramar, for appellant.

Matthew J. Conigliaro of Carlton Fields, P.A., Tampa, and Johanna W. 

Clark of Carlton Fields, Orlando, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.