alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.31
 Oplink Communications, Inc.
 Amendment to  Executive Corporate Event Agreement
 Amendment
 Recital
 Whereas,
 Whereas
 Whereas,
 Agreement
 Now, Therefore
 1.
 (b)
 Exhibit A as defined in Section 2
 Exhibit A




---



##### 



2. General Provisions.
 (a) Continuing Effect of Agreement; No Waiver.
 (b) Counterparts.
 (c) Governing Law.
 2




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof Amendment
 EXECUTIVE:
    
    OPLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.:/s/ River Gong
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/Joseph LiuRiver Gong (Xiaojiang)
    
    Print Name:
    
    Joseph LiuTitle:
    
    President and CEO




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 Options with 24 month post-termination exercise period
 Grant Date
    
    Grant ID
    
    
    Plan
    
    
    Shares
    
    
    Exercise Price4/5/01
    
    
    00000060
    
    
    
    2000
    
    
    
    78
    
    
    $
    2.6254/5/01
    
    
    20000300
    
    
    
    2000
    
    
    
    124,922
    
    
    $
    2.625
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00035-CR

JESSE SMITH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 431st District 

Court

of Denton County (F17-1278-431)

February 6, 2020

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
-77.8 -77.6 -77.4 -77.2 -77.0 -76.8 -76.6 -76.4 -76.2

 38.4

 38.6

 38.8

 39.0

 39.2

 39.4

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/08

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 08 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.90 N 76.65 W Meters AGL
# C_2016135EN.01000101.xml

| 16.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 April 2016

(2016/C 135/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1284 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4414 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79575 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1902 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0919 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3044 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,025 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,54 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2967 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4728 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2212 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4648 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4535 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7527 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6334 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5330 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 295,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4424 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3072 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5005 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 862,67 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4085 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,051 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,0125 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,584 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9387 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7927 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,1425 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1284

JPY

Japanese yen

122,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4414

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79575

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1902

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0919

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3044

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,025

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,54

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2967

RON

Romanian leu

4,4728

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2212

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4648

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4535

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7527

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6334

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5330

KRW

South Korean won

1 295,12

ZAR

South African rand

16,4424

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3072

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5005

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 862,67

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4085

PHP

Philippine peso

52,051

RUB

Russian rouble

75,0125

THB

Thai baht

39,584

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9387

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7927

INR

Indian rupee

75,1425

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 In connection with the Annual Report of Famous Daves of America, Inc (the Registrant) on Form
10-K for the annual period ended January 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Goronkin, Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. Dated: March 18, 2005
    By:
    /s/ David GoronkinDavid GoronkinPresident, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

SEAN P. MORIARTY, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

JOHN E. WETZEL, SECRETARY OF 

CORRECTIONS; PENNSYLVANIA 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

 Respondent 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 155 MM 2015 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 8th day of December, 2015, the Petition for Leave to File Notice 

of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-590
In Re: DEREK DION CURTIS, I, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Submitted: March 18, 1997 Decided: March 31, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Derek Dion Curtis, I, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Derek Dion Curtis, a federal prisoner, petitions this court for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). Curtis alleges that he was never indicted by a grand jury and never waived indictment and that court officials, the Assistant United States Attorney, and the federal public defender conspired to use a bogus indictment to prosecute him. A court will not entertain a § 2241 petition unless a motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, is "inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of [an inmate's] detention." See Swain v. Pressley , 430 U.S. 372, 381 (1977). The petitioner bears the burden of showing the inadequacy or ineffectiveness o f a § 2255 motion. McGhee v. Hanberry , 604 F.2d 9, 10 (5th Cir. 1979).As in his previous § 2241 petition in which he raised identical claims, Curtis has failed to present any facts showing that § 2255 is an inadequate remedy. See In re Curtis , No. 95-8059, 1995 WL 538976 (4th Cir. Sept. 12, 1995) (unpublished), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 64 U.S.L.W. 3485 (U.S. Jan. 16, 1996) (No. 95-7104). Curtis' conclusory allegations that the district court and the prosecutor used a bogus indictment do not establish that the remedy under § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective. See McGhee , 604 F.2d at 11. Accordingly, we deny this petition. Curtis' motions for immediate adjudication and for bail pending a decision are now moot and3 are denied for that reason. We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.4

                              POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Asuka Nakahara and William P. Leiser the true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him
and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997, and to sign any or all amendments to
such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, each of them
with or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                                   /s/ JAMES R. ERWIN
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   James R. Erwin


Dated:    March 31, 1998
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

|Subsidiary                                                 |  | Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------
|Midway Interactive Inc.                                    |  | Delaware                     
|Midway Home Entertainment Inc.                             |  | Delaware                     
|Midway/Nintendo Inc.50% owned                             |  | Delaware                     
|Midway Games West Inc. (formerly, Atari Games Corporation) |  | California                   
|Midway Games Sales Corporation                             |  | Barbados                     
|Midway Games (Europe) Gmbh                                 |  | Germany                      
|Midway Games Limited                                       |  | United Kingdom               
|Midway Amusement Games, LLC                                |  | Delaware (LLC)               
|Midway Sales Company, LLC                                  |  | Delaware (LLC)               
|Midway Home Studios Inc.                                   |  | Delaware                     
|K. K. Midway Games                                         |  | Japan                        
|Midway Games Canada Corp.                                  |  | Canada                       
|Surreal Software Inc.                                      |  | Washington                   
|Midway StudiosAustin Inc.                                 |  | Texas                        
|Midway StudiosLos Angeles Inc.                            |  | California                   
|Midway Games GmbH                                          |  | Germany                      

---



QuickLinks
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

484 

KA 09-02347 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JAMES ELLIOTT, ALSO KNOWN AS JAMES E. ELLIOTT,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

GARY A. HORTON, PUBLIC DEFENDER, BATAVIA (BRIDGET L. FIELD OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Robert C.

Noonan, J.), rendered October 23, 2009. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Entered: April 29, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
#### Johns and others, Appellants, vs. Northwestern Mutual Relief Association, Respondent.

*November 5*

*November 24, 1896.*

*Appealable order; New trial after remission of record to trial court: Mutual benefit societies.*

On an appeal in an equitable action against a mutual benefit society to enforce the levy of an assessment to pay a loss, it was held that the defendant was not liable because the deceased came to his death by suicide; but the question whether under the peculiar wording of the contract the plaintiffs could recover a percentage of the assessments paid was left undetermined, and the cause was remanded for further proceedings according to law. After the cause had been remitted to the trial court, a motion was made for permission to introduce additional evidence, or for a new trial.

*Held,*that an order denying such motion was not appealable.

Appeal from an order-of the circuit court for Waukesha county: Waeham Paeks, Circuit Judge.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Eor the appellants there was a brief by *Ryan & Merton,*and oral argument by *E. Merton.*

Eor the respondent there was a brief by *H. W. Ohynoweth*and *T. W. Maight,*and oral argument by *Mr. Ohynoweth.*

Cassoday, 0. J.

This action in equity was commenced September 23,1893,. to enforce an assessment to pay the loss suffered by the death of Hubert Johns, June 1, 1893, under the contract of insurance. The case was here upon a former appeal, and we held that there was no liability for such death, for the reason that it was the result of “suicide or self-destruction,” but left it open to be determined whether a recovery could be had for a percentage of the assessments paid by the deceased, under the peculiar wording of the contract, and so remanded the case for further proceedings according to law. 90 Wis. 332. Thereupon the plaintiffs moved the trial court for permission to introduce additional *432evidence, or for a new trial. From an order wholly denying ■that motion, but without costs, and ordering judgment to be entered as therein directed, the plaintiffs bring this appeal.

Manifestly, it is not an order affecting a substantial right, determining the action, and preventing a judgment from which an appeal might have been taken, within the meaning of the statutes. R. S. sec. 3069, as amended by ch. 212, Laws of 1895. It is a mere interlocutory order, and is not appealable. *In re*Schumaker, 90 Wis. 488; *Cook v.*McComb, 91 Wis. 445.

*By the*Court.— The appeal is dismissed as of November 5, 1896.
# C_2015091EN.01000501.xml

| 18.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 91/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 91/5

---

Corrigendum to new national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 84 of 12 March 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 84 of 12 March 2015

(2015/C 91/05)

On page 3:

for:

for:

‘Date of issue: September 2015’,

read:

read:

‘Date of issue: September 2014’.

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00055

- CR

Clarence Ellis Wade
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 25th District Court of Lavaca County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018

- 09

- 10097CR

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consider ed this cause on
appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
April 1, 2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0583

IN THE MATTER OF:

N.T.,

A Youth. 

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 7, 2022, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 3 2022

08/03/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0583
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection  with the Annual Report of NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: February 27, 2004                  By: /s/ Charles T. Jensen
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Name: Charles T. Jensen
                                             Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia  Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF FRANCES KISICK

PETITION OF: ELIZABETH L. BELLISSIMO

:

:

:

:

:

No. 200 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of February, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
# C_2016031EN.01000201.xml

| 28.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7899 — Alimentation Couche Tard/Topaz Energy Group/Resource Property Investment Fund/Esso Ireland)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 31/03)

On 25 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7899. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7899. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### State Justice Institute

# AGENCY:

State Justice Institute.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The SJI Board of Directors will be meeting on Monday, April 13, 2015 at 10:00 a.m. The meeting will be held at SJI Headquarters in Reston, Virginia. The purpose of this meeting is to consider grant applications for the 2nd quarter of FY 2015, and other business. All portions of this meeting are open to the public.

# ADDRESSES:

State Justice Institute, 11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1020, Reston, VA 20190.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jonathan Mattiello, Executive Director, State Justice Institute, 11951 Freedom Drive, Suite 1020, Reston, VA 20190, 571-313-8843,                         *contact@sji.gov.*

Jonathan D. Mattiello,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2015-07308 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2015119EN.01000201.xml

| 14.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 April 2015

(2015/C 119/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0552 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,20 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4715 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3309 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0373 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5480 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,392 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 296,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0136 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4156 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7985 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3925 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3324 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1779 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4187 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4491 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 163,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,8258 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,5552 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5680 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 723,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9172 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 47,200 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 55,2605 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,376 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2694 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,1398 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,8671 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0552

JPY

Japanese yen

127,20

DKK

Danish krone

7,4715

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72150

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3309

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0373

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5480

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,392

HUF

Hungarian forint

296,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0136

RON

Romanian leu

4,4156

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7985

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3925

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3324

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1779

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4187

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4491

KRW

South Korean won

1 163,30

ZAR

South African rand

12,8258

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,5552

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5680

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 723,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9172

PHP

Philippine peso

47,200

RUB

Russian rouble

55,2605

THB

Thai baht

34,376

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2694

MXN

Mexican peso

16,1398

INR

Indian rupee

65,8671

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---