alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appeal R einstated and Order filed November 4 , 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00 552

- CV

____________ IN THE INTEREST OF K.J., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 3 2 8th District Co urt Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 20

- DCV

- 269944

ORDER
This is an appeal from a judgment terminating the par ental rights of appellant, L.B. On October 26, 2021, we abated this appeal an d ordered the trial court judge to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desired to

pr osecute this appeal, a nd, if so, whether appellan t is indigent and th us e ntitled to a free record and appointed counsel on appeal. This court also order ed the trial court judge to appoint an appellate counsel for appellant if necessary
, to see that a reco rd of the hearing was made
, t o make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and to forward records of the hearing including its findings and c onclusions. On November 4, 2021, the trial court clerk forwarded the requested records, which among other thi ngs state that attorney F red Krasny was appointed as appella te counsel for appellant.2

Accordingly, this court lifts the abatement and reinstates the appeal. As the
clerk ’ s record and reporter ’ s record have both been filed with this court, appellant
is direct ed to file her brief within 20 da ys of th e date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jew ell , Bourliot , and Poissant.
**Exhibit 32.2**I, Clay C. Williams, Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of National Oilwell Varco,Inc., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “PeriodicReport”) which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and     (2) information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of National Oilwell Varco, Inc.   Date: February 26, 2007 *By: /s/ Clay C. Williams*     Clay C. Williams  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
89
M- EMO ROUTING SL'IPR&f"I ~1?;r~"'~~OVALS. DISAPPROVALS. , \.CONCl/RRENCES, OR 'SIMILAR AC'IIONS --

IMFORMATIQN 

3 

4 SEE ME 

SJGNATURE 
• 

RE-:Ej--Ttl-~h h Q.0 MEMO ING SL1·r- I --~V'EfliiYni~PP~11n:::-:vA.~--- coNCvRRENr.;;,.- --- PPROVALS, 

I NAME OR TITLE - ....,_,, OR SI ACTIONS 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 

2 

3 

4 

REMARKS 

FROM NAME OR TITLE 

ORGANIZATION ANO LOCATION 

DD FORM 

I FEB:50. ' .. ' ~- - - ~ ..,. ___ .,,....,;;. 

INITIALS 

DATE 

QRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE ANO REl\IRN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

TEl.EPllOllE 
,,~,.,,,,.., 

~~ - Vui<1 srJ((L. '/ 

• • 
------------ -

---I-~'~~~#--~~~-· ~~,_''--· 

--1-J."A-~....-c~Cd.4~'--"· ·-~ t;,_f· A I: c .s 2 ~-U-----

-----=------------,------1-~ FJ~ . .L.J/9~S-~.:;i_-__... 

-· -
Continuing Abatement Order filed November 29, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00322-CR

____________

TREVEIA SHAWNA MCCURDY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-CCR-173702

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On September 27, 2016, this court directed the trial court to execute a 

certification of the defendant’s right of appeal. Our order required the trial judge to 

file the certification in the form of a supplemental clerk’s. The record was to be filed 

with the clerk of this court on or before October 27, 2016. To date, the court has not 

received the certification. 
The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s 

active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the 

trial court’s certification is filed in this court. The court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM
# C_2016337EN.01000201.xml

| 14.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 September 2016

(2016/C 337/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1247 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4437 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84763 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5380 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0925 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2315 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3478 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4460 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3505 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4938 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4744 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7254 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5352 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5318 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 263,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0811 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5138 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4903 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 830,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6377 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,665 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,8200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,263 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6809 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,3800 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,2370 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1247

JPY

Japanese yen

114,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4437

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84763

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5380

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0925

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2315

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3478

RON

Romanian leu

4,4460

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3505

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4938

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4744

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7254

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5352

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5318

KRW

South Korean won

1 263,43

ZAR

South African rand

16,0811

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5138

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4903

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 830,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6377

PHP

Philippine peso

53,665

RUB

Russian rouble

72,8200

THB

Thai baht

39,263

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6809

MXN

Mexican peso

21,3800

INR

Indian rupee

75,2370

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 15-1888

Filed November 23, 2016

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE 

OF JOHN JOSEPH WIHLM,

LAURIE JEAN PEDERSON,

Interested Party-Appellant,

vs.

CLEAR LAKE BANK & TRUST COMPANY,

Executor-Appellee.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Cerro Gordo County, Gregg R. 

Rosenbladt, Judge.

An attorney appeals from the denial of her request for attorney’s fees. 

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Laurie J. Pederson, Rockford, pro se appellant.

Ryan G. Koopmans of Nyemaster Goode, P.C., Des Moines, for appellee.

Considered by Doyle, P.J., McDonald, J., and Mahan, S.J. *

*Senior judge assigned by order pursuant to Iowa Code section 602.9206 (2015).
2

MCDONALD, Judge.

This case is related to two other cases recently before this court. The 

facts are set forth in our previous opinions and need not be repeated herein. See 

Wihlm v. Campbell, No. 15-0401, 2016 WL 4804034, at *1 (Iowa Ct. App. Sept. 

14, 2016); Wihlm v. Campbell, No. 15-0011, 2016 WL 4801433, at *1 (Iowa Ct. 

App. Sept. 14, 2016). The present case is an appeal from a complete denial of 

the estate’s attorney’s request for fees. The district court cited ethical violations 

by the estate’s attorney in denying her request for fees in whole. Our supreme 

court discussed the ethical violation(s) at issue in a recently filed disciplinary 

decision. See Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Pederson, No. 16-0199, 

2016 WL 6650260, at *1, ___ N.W.2d ___ (Iowa Nov. 10, 2016). In light of the 

supreme court’s characterization of the attorney’s conduct and resolution of the 

disciplinary matter, the district court should have the opportunity to revisit the 

request for attorney’s fees. We express no opinion on the merits of the request. 

We do not retain jurisdiction. 

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
# C_2014235EN.01000101.xml

| 21.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 235/01

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 223, 14.7.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 212, 7.7.2014

OJ C 202, 30.6.2014

OJ C 194, 24.6.2014

OJ C 184, 16.6.2014

OJ C 175, 10.6.2014

OJ C 159, 26.5.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">GVS Properties LLC, 	Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Elsa Garcia and Teodoros Garcia, Respondents-Tenants-Respondents, - and - "John &amp; Jane Doe," Respondents.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Landlord appeals from (1) an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Verna L. Saunders, J.), dated October 23, 2012, which, among other things, conditionally granted tenants' motion to be restored to possession of the subject premises upon payment to landlord by a date certain of all rent arrears, marshal costs, and attorneys' fees in a nonpayment summary proceeding; and (2) an order (same court and Judge), dated October 24, 2012, which denied landlord's request for a stay of the aforesaid order, directed landlord to accept tenants' tender of arrears and ordered tenants to pay landlord's additional moving and storage costs.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Appeal from orders (Verna L. Saunders, J.), dated, respectively, October 23, 2012 and October 24, 2012, dismissed, without costs. </p><p>In view of landlord's unexplained four-year delay in bringing this appeal, the nature of which dictated a prompt prosecution of an appeal, if any was to be taken from the order granting tenant's posteviction motion to be restored to possession, this court would not be warranted in reviewing the discretionary determination rendered below (<i>see American Sav. Bank v Harmin Prop. Corp</i>., 274 App Div 917 [1948]). </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: December 06, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
June Term, 1860.

#### Wilcox vs. Hathaway.

A party bringing a civil action to this court, must furnish for the judges *a printed,*case, consisting of a brief abstract of the return of the clerk, and containing all the evidence, pleadings and exhibits bearing upon the questions of law and fact to be reviewed. When such- printed case is not furnished, the court will dismiss the writ of error or appeal, in their discretion, as indicated by rule 22 of this court.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Saule*County.

A motion was made by the respondent to dismiss the appeal, for the want of a printed case, as required by the rule of this court.

October 15.

*By the Court,*

Cole, J.

The motion to dismiss this appeal for the want of a proper printed case, must be sustained. The appeal is from an order confirming a sale of mortgaged premises, and we have looked into the record far enough to see that it contains a number of affidavits, letters and documents'wMch we suppose were used in the conrt below on *544the Rearing of this matter, none of which Rave been printed. rule which requires a printed abstract of the return of the clerk, is for the convenience of the members of this court, and where testimony, consisting of affidavits, letters, &c., is to be reviewed, such testimony must be printed, or we cannot undertake to examine it. It would be impossible for this court to transact the business which comes before it, if we had to examine voluminous records, decipher manuscript, and determine the force and effect of evidence in that manner. If parties desire us to pass upon the merits of such cases, they must furnish for the use and convenience, of the members of this court, proper printed cases,' consisting of a brief abstract of the return of the clerk, and also containing all the evidence, pleadings and exhibits bearing upon the questions bf law and fact they wish reviewed. Otherwise, we shall not undertake to examine them, but will dismiss the writ of error or appeal, in our discretion, as indicated by rule 22 of this court.

Motion to dismiss appeal granted.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2780 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit certain adverse personnel 

actions taken against members of the Armed Forces based on declining 

the COVID–19 vaccine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2021 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. TUBERVILLE, Mr. LANKFORD, and Mr. 

CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit certain 

adverse personnel actions taken against members of the 

Armed Forces based on declining the COVID–19 vaccine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘COVID–19 Vaccine 

5 Dishonorable Discharge Prevention Act’’. 


Pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2780 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ADVERSE PERSONNEL ACTIONS 

2 TAKEN AGAINST MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES BASED ON DECLINING COVID–19 

4 VACCINE. 

5 (a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) The Secretary of Defense has announced a 

7 COVID–19 vaccine mandate will take effect for the 

8 Department of Defense. 

9 (2) Reports of adverse actions being taken, or 

10 threatened, by military leadership at all levels are 

11 antithetical to our fundamental American values. 

12 (3) Any discharge other than honorable denotes 

13 a dereliction of duty or a failure to serve the United 

14 States and its people to the best of the ability of an 

15 individual. 

16 (b) PROHIBITION.—Chapter 55 of title 10, United 

17 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 1107a 

18 the following new section: 

19 ‘‘§ 1107b. Prohibition on certain adverse personnel 

20 actions related to COVID–19 vaccine re21 quirement 

22 ‘‘Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a mem23 ber of the armed forces subject to discharge on the basis 

24 of the member choosing not to receive the COVID–19 vac25 cine may only receive an honorable discharge.’’. 


Pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2780 IS

1 (c) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

2 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

3 after the item relating to section 1107a the following new 

4 item: 

‘‘1107b. Prohibition on certain adverse personnel actions related to COVID–19 

vaccine requirement.’’. 

Æ 


Pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
# C_2015397EN.01000901.xml

| 28.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 397/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 397/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 November 2015

(2015/C 397/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0580 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,75 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4605 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70290 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2420 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0900 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,024 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,08 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2631 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4467 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0865 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4689 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4121 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2001 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6189 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4927 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 221,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1490 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7650 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6230 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 628,60 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5150 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,921 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,9945 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,972 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9359 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5099 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,6449 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0580

JPY

Japanese yen

129,75

DKK

Danish krone

7,4605

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70290

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2420

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0900

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,024

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,08

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2631

RON

Romanian leu

4,4467

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0865

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4689

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4121

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2001

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6189

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4927

KRW

South Korean won

1 221,76

ZAR

South African rand

15,1490

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7650

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6230

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 628,60

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5150

PHP

Philippine peso

49,921

RUB

Russian rouble

69,9945

THB

Thai baht

37,972

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9359

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5099

INR

Indian rupee

70,6449

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016050EN.01000101.xml

| 10.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 50/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 50/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7449 — SNCF Mobilités/Eurostar International Limited)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 50/01)

On 13 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7449. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7449. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DESIGN VALUE REPORT
Mar. 19, 2012 Report Request ID: 969908 Report Code: AMP480

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID: FMC

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 04 04 003

003 1005

0011 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration 81102
SELECTED OPTIONS

MERGE PDF FILES QUARTERLY DATA IN WORKFILE WORKFILE DELIMITER SINGLE EVENT PROCESSING USER SITE METADATA Option Type Option Value YES NO

, EXCLUDE REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENTS

STREET ADDRESS GLOBAL DATES

2011 Start Date End Date 2011 Tribal Code

APPLICABLE STANDARDS Standard Description PM10 24-hour 2006UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: Mar. 19, 2012

Notes: 1. Warning: Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 2. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*'). Page 1of 2UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AIR QUALITY SYSTEM PRELIMINARY DESIGN VALUE REPORT Report Date: Mar. 19, 2012

Notes: 1. Warning: Computed design values are a snapshot of the data at the time the report was run (may not be all data for year). 2. Annual Values not meeting completeness criteria are marked with an asterisk ('*'). Page 2 of 2 

### Pollutant: Standard Units: NAAQS Standard: Statistic: PM10 Total 0-10um STP(81102) Design Value Year: 2011 Micrograms/cubic meter (25 C)(001) PM10 24-hour 2006 Annual Estimated Days > Standard REPORT EXCLUDES MEASUREMENTS WITH REGIONALLY CONCURRED EVENT FLAGS.
Level: 150 State Name: Arizona

Site ID POC STREET ADDRESS | | | Estimated #Complete Cert. | | |Estimated #Complete Cert. | | | Estimated Quarter Cert. | | | Estimated Exceedances Validity

Ind. 2011 2010 2009

04-003-0011 04-003-0011 04-003-1005 1

2 1 HOUSING AREA, PAUL SPUR HOUSING AREA, PAUL SPUR 1445-1449 15TH STREET 0 0 0 4

4 3 0

0 0 4

4 3 0

0 0 4

4 4 0 0 0 Y Y N * * Count Quarter Exceedances
0

0 0 Quarter Count Exceedances
0

0 0 Count #Complete Exceedances
0

0 0 3 - Year
# C_2016330EN.01000101.xml

| 8.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 330/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8163 — AC/EYSA/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 330/01)

On 1 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8163. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8163. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---