alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY M. MORALES-CASTRO,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 500 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANTHONY M. MORALES-CASTRO,

Petitioner

No. 501 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 5th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000373

05-DEC-2016

08:20 AM
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

THEODORE MADISON TOWNER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3548

[July 14, 2022]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Lawrence Michael Mirman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2010-

CF-002781A.

Theodore Madison Towner, Crestview, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Order entered November 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00740-CR

KURNICUS HAYES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-30966-T

ORDER

The record was due October 1, 2016. By postcard dated October 4, 2016, we notified 

court reporter Mary Snider that the record was overdue and directed her to file the record within 

thirty days. To date, the reporter’s record has not been filed, and the Court has had no 

communication regarding the reporter’s record.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether 

appellant has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or 

for any other reason.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.
 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written findings of fact, 

any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date 

of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal 

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Patrick J. Kealy, Chief Executive Officer of Star Energy Corporation (the Company), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 15, 2008 |  | /s/ Patrick J. Kealy                 
|                       |  | Patrick J. Kealy                     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
|                       |  | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY
AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Date: 09/02/2011

SUBJECT: Cyflufenamid. Amendment to DP# 364556 Summary Document to Recommend 30-day PBI for All Crops.

PC Code: 555550 DP Barcodes: D364556 and D393278
Decision No.: 403833 Registration No.: 8033-RNG
Petition No.: 8F7488 Regulatory Action: Section 3 Registration Risk Assessment Type: NA Case No.: NA
TXR No.: NA CAS No.: 180409-60-3
MRID No.: NA 40 CFR: NA
Ver.Apr.08

FROM: Meheret Negussie, Chemist Risk Assessment Branch III (RAB3) Health Effects Division (HED) (7509P)

THROUGH: Leung Cheng, Senior Chemist RAB3/HED (7509P)

TO: Nancy Dodd, Risk Assessor RAB3/HED (7509P)

and

Marc Suarez/Samantha Hulkower RM#13
Insecticide Branch Registration Division (RD) (7505P)Cyflufenamid Summary of Analytical Chemistry and Residue Data DP#s: 364556, 393278

Page 2 of 2 This memorandum amends the cyflufenamid summary document DP# D364556, M. Negussie,
07/23/2010 to:

 recommend a 30-day plantback interval (PBI) to all crops (the previous assessment concluded a 30-day PBI for small grains and leafy vegetables and 365-day PBI for all other crops),

 amend the Section B revision to include a 30-day PBI for all crops,

 amend the conclusion under 860. 1850 and 860. 1900 to reflect the aforementioned
recommendation.

HED has determined that the submitted confined rotational crop data support a 30-day plantback interval for all crops. Even though Metabolite 149-F6 was detected in mature carrot foliage from the 120-day PBI at 32.51% TRR (0.013 ppm) and carrot foliage was not planted at higher PBI,
HED has concluded that 149-F6 is not a residue of concern since it was detected at low levels and was not detected in other crops. In addition, there was no toxicity concern (ChemSAC 02/16/2011).

All other information contained in the 2010 summary document (DP# D364556) remains unchanged.
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Joseph Y.Liu, Chief Executive Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies that,to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2005 to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “***Annual Report***”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**2.**The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of operationsof the Company for the periods covered by the Annual Report.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 23rd day of September, 2005.     /s/ Joseph Y. Liu     Joseph Y. Liu    Chief Executive Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SECand is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Actof 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of theForm 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Simon Property Group, L.P., on Form 10-K for the
period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



/s/ DAVID SIMON David Simon
Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
March 12, 2010/s/ STEPHEN E. STERRETT Stephen E. Sterrett
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Simon Property Group, Inc., General Partner
March 12, 2010


125

---



QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MGA Insurance Company, Inc. d/b/a 

Gainsco Auto Insurance and/or Gainsco 

Auto Insurance Agency, Inc.,

 Appellant, 

v.

Samla Jift Velasquez-Ramirez,

 Appellee. 

§

 

§

§

§

§

§

'

'

'

'

No. 08-16-00192-CV

Appeal from the

353rd District Court

of Travis County, Texas 

(TC# D-1-GN-16-002546)

O R D E R

The Court has received and filed the Appellant’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. 

The appeal is therefore reinstated. The motion is set for submission on December 14, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of December, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Ex parte Richard Vincent Letizia

Appellate case number: 01-16-00808-CR

Trial court case number: 2112524A

Trial court: County Criminal Court at Law No. 10 of Harris County

Appellant, Richard Vincent Letizia, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s 

order denying his application for a writ of habeas corpus. The Court has determined that 

it will consider briefing in this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.1. Appellant’s brief was 

due to be filed on November 28, 2016.

Appellant has filed a motion requesting an extension of 120 days, or until March 

28, 2017, to file his brief. The motion is granted in part. Appellant’s brief will be due 

no later than February 27, 2017. See TEX. R. APP. P. 31.2; 38.6(d). No further 

extensions will be granted.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

  Acting individually 

Date: December 6, 2016
# C_2016049EN.01000501.xml

| 9.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 February 2016

(2016/C 49/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1101 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4631 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4307 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1051 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5885 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,062 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,69 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4352 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4798 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2721 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5726 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5487 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6481 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6802 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5640 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 343,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9885 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2995 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6455 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 178,82 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6462 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,084 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,8419 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,459 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3245 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7145 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,5245 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1101

JPY

Japanese yen

129,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4631

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77240

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4307

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1051

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5885

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,062

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,69

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4352

RON

Romanian leu

4,4798

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2721

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5726

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5487

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6481

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6802

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5640

KRW

South Korean won

1 343,41

ZAR

South African rand

17,9885

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2995

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6455

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 178,82

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6462

PHP

Philippine peso

53,084

RUB

Russian rouble

85,8419

THB

Thai baht

39,459

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3245

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7145

INR

Indian rupee

75,5245

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, J. Michael Dodson, ChiefFinancial Officer of DDi Corp. (the “Company”) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: 

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”)fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report. 

 

Date: October 29, 2010
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00551-CV

T. S. A., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY 

NO. 20-FL-289-A, THE HONORABLE THOMAS NATHANIEL STUCKEY, 

JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

Appellant T. S. A. filed her notice of appeal on October 26, 2021. The appellate 

record was complete on November 15, 2021, making appellant’s brief due on December 6, 2021. 

On December 3, 2021, counsel for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief.

The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals 

from suits for termination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days 

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting 

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order James B. Peplinski to file 

appellant’s brief no later than December 26, 2021. If the brief is not filed by that date, counsel 

may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.
2

It is ordered on December 14, 2021.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**          I, Michael K. Robinson, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Broadview Networks Holdings, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Intentionally omitted  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date:  November 14, 2007           /s/  Michael K. Robinson   Michael K. Robinson    Chief Executive Officer and President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
INTELIDATA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
HERNDON, VIRGINIA


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements No. 333-
16115, No. 333-16117 and No. 333-16121 of InteliData Technologies Corporation on
Form S-8 of our report dated February 5, 1997 appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of InteliData Technologies Corporation for the year ended December 31,
1996.




/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP



Hartford, Connecticut
March 28, 1997
CERTIFICATION



I, Ron Lizee, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Acrongenomics Inc.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and







Date: August 14, 2004

/s/ Ron Lizee

Ron Lizee

Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
NCO Group, Inc. on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-42743 and 333-62131) and Form S-4
(File No. 333-73087) of our report dated February 18, 1999, on our audits of the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules of NCO
Group, Inc. as of December 31, 1997 and 1998, and for each of the three years
in the period ending December 31, 1998, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 30, 1999
#### Dicken *v.*Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Lines, Appellant.

October 7, 1907:

Argued May 10, 1907.

Appeal, No. 184, April T., 1907, by defendant, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., Sept. T., 1906, No. 600, on bill in equity in case of J. Charles Dicken v. The Southwest Pennsylvania Pipe Lines.

Before Rice, P. J., Henderson, O ready and Beaver, J J.

Affirmed.

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

For the reasons given in case of Henry A. Davis against this defendant the decree is affirmed at the costs of the appellant; the period of stay therein mentioned to be computed from the date of the decree of this court,
#### Buckham’s License.

October 7, 1907 :

Argued May 17, 1907.

Appeal, No. 203, April T., 1907, by Edward Buckham, from order of Q. S. Mercer Co., Jan. T., 1907, No. 45, refusing a retail license.

Before Rice, P. J., Hendebsob, Oblady, Head and Beaveb, JJ.

Affirmed.

Per Curiam,

The order is affirmed.