##### Table of Contents





UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D. C. 20549





FORM 10-K





(Mark One)

|x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007

OR



| ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commission file number 1-12147





DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)







|                                                               |  |                                        
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Delaware                                                       |  | 71-0795870                             
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|                                                               | 
|210 East Elm Street, P. O. Box 7200, El Dorado, Arkansas       |  | 71731-7200                             
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                             

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (870) 881-9400

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



|                                                                  |  |                                          
|----------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Title of each class                                               |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
|Common Stock, $.01 Par Value                                      |  | New York Stock Exchange, Inc.            
|Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock Purchase Rights |  | New York Stock Exchange, Inc.            

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None





Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes   ̈    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act.    Yes   ̈    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No   ̈

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large
accelerated filer   ̈                Accelerated filer  x                Non-accelerated filer    ̈

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes   ̈    No  x

The aggregate market value of the Common Stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange as of June 30, 2007, was $349,890,240. For purposes of this computation, all officers, directors, and 5% beneficial owners
of the registrant (as indicated in Item 12) are deemed to be affiliates. Such determination should not be deemed an admission that such directors, officers, or 5% beneficial owners are, in fact, affiliates of the registrant.

Number of shares of Common Stock, $.01 Par Value, outstanding at February 15, 2008, was 12,395,761.

Documents incorporated by reference:

The Registrants definitive Proxy Statement relating to the
Annual Meeting of Stockholders on April 24, 2008.









---

##### Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS - 2007 FORM 10-K REPORT



|           |  |                                                                                                               |  |            
|---------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------
|           |  |                                                                                                               |  | PageNumbers
|           |  | PART I                                                                                                        |  | 3          
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 1.    |  | Business                                                                                                      |  | 3          
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 1A.   |  | Risk Factors                                                                                                  |  | 15         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 1B.   |  | Unresolved Staff Comments                                                                                     |  | 18         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 2.    |  | Properties                                                                                                    |  | 18         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 3.    |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                             |  | 18         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 4.    |  | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders                                                           |  | 18         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|           |  | PART II                                                                                                       |  | 20         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 5.    |  | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |  | 20         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 6.    |  | Selected Financial Data                                                                                       |  | 21         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 7.    |  | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations                         |  | 22         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 7A.   |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                                                    |  | 44         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 8.    |  | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data                                                                   |  | 45         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 9.    |  | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure                          |  | 87         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 9A.   |  | Controls and Procedures                                                                                       |  | 87         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 9B.   |  | Other Information                                                                                             |  | 87         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|           |  | PART III                                                                                                      |  | 88         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 10.   |  | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant                                                            |  | 88         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 11.   |  | Executive Compensation                                                                                        |  | 88         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 12.   |  | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters                |  | 89         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 13.   |  | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions                                                                |  | 89         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 14.   |  | Principal Accountant Fees and Services                                                                        |  | 89         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|           |  | PART IV                                                                                                       |  | 90         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Item 15.   |  | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules                                                                    |  | 90         
|           |  |                                                                                                              
|Signatures |  |                                                                                                               |  | 93         



2



---

##### Table of Contents

PART I



|Item 1. | Business
|------- | --------

Introduction

Deltic Timber Corporation (Deltic or the Company) is a natural resources company engaged primarily in the growing and harvesting
of timber and the manufacture and marketing of lumber. Deltic owns approximately 438,600 acres of timberland, primarily in Arkansas and north Louisiana. The Companys sawmill operations are located at Ola in central Arkansas (the Ola
Mill) and at Waldo in south Arkansas (the Waldo Mill). In addition to its timber and lumber operations, the Company is engaged in real estate development in central Arkansas. The Company also holds a 50 percent interest in Del-Tin
Fiber L.L.C. (Del-Tin Fiber), a joint venture to manufacture and market medium density fiberboard (MDF). Deltic is a calendar-year company for both financial and income tax reporting.

The Company is organized into four segments: (1) Woodlands, which manages the Companys timberlands; (2) Mills, which consists of
Deltics two sawmills that manufacture a variety of softwood lumber products; (3) Real Estate, which includes the Companys three active real estate developments and a related country club operation; and (4) Corporate, which
consists of executive management, accounting, information systems, human resources, purchasing, treasury, income tax, and legal staff functions that provide support services to the operating business units. (The Company currently does not allocate
the cost of maintaining these support functions to its operating units.)

The Companys timberlands consist primarily of Southern
Pine, known in the industry as a type of softwood. Deltic considers its timberlands to be the Companys most valuable asset and the harvest of stumpage to be its most significant source of income; accordingly, Deltic actively
manages its timberlands to increase productivity and maximize the long-term value of these timber assets. The Company harvests timber from the timberlands in accordance with its harvest plans and sells such timber in the domestic market or converts
it to lumber in its sawmills. Stumpage supplied to the Companys sawmills is transferred at prices that approximate market. The Company implemented a timberland acquisition program in late 1996. Thus far, the Company has focused its acquisition
program on timberland in its current operating area. The Company also initiated a program in 1999 to identify, for possible sale, non-strategic timberland and higher and better use lands.

The Companys two sawmills employ modern technology in order to improve efficiency, reduce labor costs, maximize utilization of the timber resource,
and maintain high standards for production quality with safety being one of the highest priorities. In addition, each mill is strategically located near significant portions of the Companys timberlands. The mills can produce a variety of
lumber products, including dimension lumber, boards, timbers, decking, and secondary manufacturing products, such as finger-jointed studs. These lumber products are sold primarily to wholesale distributors, lumber treaters, and truss manufacturers
in the South and Midwest and are used mainly in residential construction, roof trusses, and laminated beams. Combined annual permitted capacity of the two mills at December 31, 2007, was 390 million board feet (MMBF). The
Companys total finished lumber production was 213 MMBF in 2007 compared to 253 MMBF in 2006 and 265 MMBF in 2005.

The Companys
real estate operations were started in 1985 to add value to former timberland strategically located in the growth corridor of west Little Rock, Arkansas. Since that time, the Company has been developing Chenal Valley, a premier planned community
consisting of 4,700 acres of residential and commercial properties. The property is being developed in stages, and real estate sales to-date have consisted primarily of residential lots, which are sold to builders or individuals, and commercial
sites. In addition to Chenal Valley, Deltic has developed Chenal Downs, a 400-acre development located just outside Chenal Valley, and is developing Red Oak Ridge, an 800-acre development in Hot Springs, Arkansas. During 2007, the Company and
Central Arkansas Water entered into a full and complete settlement of a pending condemnation litigation involving 680 acres of undeveloped real estate within the watershed of Lake Maumelle in western Pulaski County, Arkansas. Approximately 640 acres
were part of a planned development of the Company. (For additional information, See Note 21  Commitments and Contingencies.)



3



---

##### Table of Contents

The Del-Tin Fiber plant is located near El Dorado, Arkansas. Construction of the plant was completed, and
initial production began, in 1998. The plant is designed to have an annual capacity of 150 million square feet (MMSF) on a 3/4 inch basis, making it one of the largest plants of its type in the world. MDF, which is used primarily in
the furniture, flooring, and molding industries, is manufactured from sawmill residuals such as chips, shavings, and sawdust, pressed and held together by an adhesive bond.

From the time production began at Del-Tin Fiber in 1998 until the fourth quarter of 2003, both operating and financial performance were below the
expectations established at the time the decision to construct the plant was made. As a result, on April 25, 2002, Deltic announced that Banc One Capital Markets, Inc. had been retained as financial advisor to assist in the evaluation of
strategic alternatives for the Companys investment in Del-Tin Fiber. Subsequently, Deltics management and Board of Directors completed its review of these strategic alternatives and announced the Company intended to exit the MDF business
upon the earliest and most reasonable opportunity provided by the market. As a result of this decision, the Companys evaluation of possible impairment of the carrying value of its investment in the joint-venture was based primarily upon the
estimated cash flows from a sale of the Companys interest during 2003 and resulted in a determination that the Companys investment was impaired as of December 31, 2002. The investment was written off to zero.

Due to the Companys commitment to fund its share of any of the facilitys operating working capital needs until the facility was able to
consistently generate sufficient funds to meet its cash requirements or Deltics ownership was sold, the Company recognized losses in Del-Tin Fiber equal to the extent of these advances during 2003. For the year of 2003, such advances
approximated the Companys equity share of losses for the plant; accordingly, the investment in Del-Tin Fiber at December 31, 2003, was zero. The Company also continued to utilize its management resources to work with Del-Tins
management and the joint-venture partner to improve operating performance at the plant. As a result of these improvements, on December 11, 2003, Deltics Board of Directors revised its intent regarding the Companys investment in
Del-Tin Fiber and ceased efforts to sell the Companys interest in the joint venture, while continuing to focus on improving operating and financial results of the plant. Due to this decision, the 2003 evaluation of fair value for the
investment was based primarily upon the future net cash flows from Del-Tin Fibers operations over the remaining life of the plant. In 2004 through 2007, the Company recorded its equity share of the operating results of the joint venture.

Forest Products Industry

Deltic is
primarily a wood products producer operating in a commodity-based business environment, with a major diversification in real estate development. This environment is affected by a number of factors, including general economic conditions, interest
rates, imports, foreign exchange rates, housing starts, residential repair and remodeling, commercial construction, industry capacity and production levels, the availability of raw material, and weather conditions. The Mills segment has been
affected by housing starts in the U.S. which declined to its lowest level in 16 years. Several factors influencing the decrease were stricter lending practices brought about by subprime loan failures, construction loan delinquencies that are causing
lenders to tighten credit for new developments, increased home inventory levels, and economic concerns with the U.S. economy. Consequently, the high demand and pricing level for softwood lumber products experienced during 2004 and 2005 have steadily
declined for the past two years.

Lumber prices have historically been, and will remain, volatile. Sawtimber prices have generally been
more stable than lumber prices. Over the three years immediately preceding 2005, sawtimber prices remained relatively flat. However, during 2005, poor weather conditions and increased sawmill production levels resulted in increases in average
sawtimber prices when compared to 2004. Sawtimber prices during 2006 remained comparable to 2005, but fell to pre-2005 levels during 2007.



4



---

##### Table of Contents

The southern U.S., in which all of the Companys operations are located, is a major timber and
lumber producing region. There are an estimated 208 million acres of timberland in the region, of which approximately 132 million acres contain softwood, predominately Southern Pine. Unlike other major timber-producing areas in North
America, most of this acreage is privately held. The estimated breakdown of ownership of softwood timberland in the southern U.S. is 87 percent private, five percent national forest, and eight percent other public. Although there can be no
assurance, management anticipates that the southern U.S. timber resource will be subject to strong demand for the foreseeable future and also believes that the South will have a strategic advantage over other U.S. timber-producing regions due to
regulatory, geographic, and other factors.

Woodlands

The Company owns approximately 438,600 acres of timberland, primarily in Arkansas and north Louisiana, stocked principally with Southern Pine. Management considers the timberlands to be Deltics most valuable
asset and the harvest of this stumpage to be the Companys most significant source of income.

The approximate breakdown of the
Companys timberland acreage at year-end 2007 consisted of the following:



|                |  |        
|--------------- |  | -------
|                |  | Acres  
|Pine forest     |  | 192,000
|Pine plantation |  | 175,000
|Hardwood forest |  | 23,000 
|Other           |  | 48,600 
|                |  |        
|Total           |  | 438,600
|                |  |        

The Companys timberlands are well diversified by age class. The timberland classified as
pine forest is primarily managed on an all-aged basis and contains mature timber that is ready to be harvested over the next several years and includes stream-management zones. Pine plantations are primarily less than 30 years old, with the majority
ranging in age from 5 to 25 years. At the age of 20 years, pine plantations begin building a significant amount of pine sawtimber tonnage.

Timber Inventory. The Companys estimated standing timber inventory is calculated for each tract by utilizing growth formulas based on representative sample tracts and tree counts for various diameter classifications. The
calculation of pine inventory is subject to periodic adjustments based on sample cruises and actual volumes harvested. The hardwood inventory shown in the following table is only an approximation; therefore, the physical quantity of such timber may
vary significantly from this approximation. Estimated inventory of standing timber as of December 31, 2007, consisted of the following:



|                |  |                      
|--------------- |  | ---------------------
|                |  | EstimatedVolume(Tons)
|Pine timber     |  |                      
|Sawtimber       |  | 11,389,000           
|Pulpwood        |  | 4,770,000            
|                | 
|Hardwood timber |  |                      
|Sawtimber       |  | 1,660,000            
|Pulpwood        |  | 950,000              



5



---

##### Table of Contents

The Companys pine sawtimber is either used in its sawmills or sold to third parties. Products that
can be manufactured from this resource include dimension lumber, boards, timbers, decking, and secondary products, used primarily in residential construction. Deltics hardwood sawtimber is sold to third parties and is primarily used in the
production of railroad ties, flooring, and pallets. Pulpwood consists of logs with a diameter of less than nine inches. Both pine and hardwood pulpwood are sold to third parties for use primarily in the manufacture of paper.

Timber Growth. Timber growth rate is an important variable for forest products companies since it ultimately determines how much timber can be
harvested on a sustainable basis. A higher growth rate permits larger annual harvests as replacement timber regenerates. Growth rates vary depending on species, location, age, and forestry management practices. The growth rate, net of mortality, for
Deltics Southern Pine averages five to six percent of standing inventory per annum. The Company considers a 30 to 35 year rotation optimal for most pine plantations.

Timberland Management. Forestry practices vary by geographic region and depend on factors such as soil productivity, weather, terrain, and timber
species, size, age, and stocking. The Company actively manages its timberlands based on these factors and other relevant information to increase productivity and maximize the long-term value of its timber assets. In general, the Companys
timberland management involves harvesting and thinning operations, reforestation, cull timber removal programs, and the introduction of genetically improved seedlings.

Deltic has developed and operates its own seed orchard. Seeds from the orchard are grown by third parties to produce genetically improved seedlings for planting. These seedlings are developed through selective
cross-pollination to produce trees with preferred characteristics, including higher growth rates, fewer limbs, straighter trunks, and greater resistance to disease. However, this process does not involve genetic engineering. The seedlings are
planted in all-aged stands, or a site is completely replanted in the case of a final harvest of mature stands. During 2007, about 8,400 acres were planted, primarily using seedlings grown from seeds produced at the orchard facility, with another
approximately 13,000 acres scheduled to be planted in 2008, as the Company continues to reforest understocked tracts. The Company meets or exceeds, in all material respects, the reforestation recommendations of the Arkansas Forestry
Commissions Best Management Practices. In addition, the Company has been certified under the Sustainable Forestry Initiative (SFI) program with regards to its timberland management practices.

The Company actively utilizes commercial thinning practices. Thinning operations consist of the selective removal of trees within a stand, usually a
plantation, and improve overall productivity by enhancing the growth of the remaining trees while generating revenues.

The Companys
silviculture program is designed to control undesirable, competitive vegetation in its forests and to increase pine growth rates and reproduction. Deltic treated about 13,400 acres, 13,000 acres, and 15,000 acres under this program in 2007, 2006,
and 2005, respectively.

Harvest Plans. Management views the timberlands as assets with substantial inherent value apart from the
sawmills and intends to manage the timberlands on a basis that permits regeneration of the timberlands over time. The Company intends to continue to manage the timberlands on a sustainable-yield basis and has no plans to harvest timber on an ongoing
basis at levels that would diminish its timber inventory. In 2007, the Company harvested 575,637 tons of pine sawtimber from its timberlands. Under the current plan, Deltic intends to harvest approximately 575,000 tons of pine sawtimber in 2008.

The Companys harvest plans are generally designed to project multi-year harvest schedules. In addition, harvest plans are updated at
least annually and reviewed on a monthly basis to monitor performance and to make any necessary modifications to the plans in response to changing forestry conditions, market conditions, contractual obligations, regulatory limitations, and other
relevant factors.

Since harvest plans are based on projections of demand, price, availability of timber from other sources, and other
factors that may be outside of the Companys control, actual harvesting levels may vary. Management believes that the Companys harvest plans are sufficiently flexible to permit modification in response to fluctuations in the markets for
logs and lumber.



6



---

##### Table of Contents

Access. Substantially all of the timberlands are accessible by a system of low impact and low
maintenance roads. Deltic generally uses third-party road crews to conduct construction and maintenance of these roads, and the Company regularly exchanges access easements and cooperates with other area forest products companies and the U.S. Forest
Service.

Wildlife Management. The Company has an active wildlife management program for its properties. Deltic leased approximately
420,000 and 422,000 acres to hunting clubs in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Companys wildlife biologist has conducted white-tailed deer management clinics throughout Arkansas. In addition, Deltic cooperates with federal, state, and private
agencies in various wildlife studies. The Company also works with the Arkansas Game and Fish Commission to re-establish the black bear population in South Arkansas.

Client-Land Management. In addition to managing its own timberlands, Deltic also manages timberlands owned by others under management contracts with one-year renewable terms. This program provided harvest
planning, silvicultural improvements, and maintenance work for approximately 64,400 acres in 2007.

Timberland Acquisitions.The
Company implemented a timberland acquisition program in late 1996. This ongoing program is designed to enable the Company to continue to increase harvest levels, while expanding its timber inventory. In addition, it will allow the Company to
maintain or increase the volume of logs supplied to its sawmills from its own timberlands, when economically feasible.

The Company intends
to continue to focus its acquisition program on timberlands that range from fully-stocked to cutover tracts. Unlike other timber-producing areas of North America, most of the timberland in the southern U.S. is privately held, making it potentially
available for acquisition. There can be no assurance that timber properties suitable for acquisition will be identified by the Company, or that once identified, such properties will ultimately be acquired by the Company.

Deltic formed an acquisition team to implement its timberland acquisition program. Lands considered for purchase are evaluated based on location, site
index, timber stocking, and growth potential. Approximately 125,000 acres of strategically located pine timberlands have been added since the inception of the program. Individual land purchases have ranged from three acres to 21,700 acres.

Land Sales. In 1999, the Company initiated a program to identify for possible sale non-strategic timberlands and higher and better
use lands. Sales totaled 3,315 acres in 2001; 3,418 acres in 2002; 4,130 acres in 2003; 1,150 acres in 2004; 45 acres in 2005; 40 acres in 2006; and 893 acres in 2007.

Leasing. The Company also generates revenue from the leasing of hunting, oil and gas, and other rights on its timberlands. For the years ended 2007 and 2006, the Company had hunting lease revenues totaling
$1,695,000 and $1,599,000, respectively. During 2007 and 2006, the Company had leased net mineral acres of approximately 37,600 and 30,700 acres, respectively, and recorded oil and gas lease revenues of $1,352,000 and $918,000, respectively.

Mills

The Companys two sawmills
are located at Ola in central Arkansas and at Waldo in south Arkansas, near significant portions of the timberlands. The mills employ modern technology in order to improve efficiency, reduce labor costs, maximize utilization of the timber resource,
and maintain high quality standards of production with safety being one of the highest priorities. Logs processed into lumber are obtained from the Companys timberlands and from public and private landowners. The Company selects logs for
processing in its mills based on size, grade, and the prevailing market price. The Ola Mill is equipped for maximum utilization of smaller diameter logs, while the Waldo Mill can process both smaller and larger diameter logs. The mills produce a
variety of softwood lumber products, including dimension lumber, boards, timbers, decking, and at the larger Waldo Mill, secondary products



7



---

##### Table of Contents

such as finger-jointed studs. The lumber is sold primarily to wholesale distributors, lumber treaters, and truss manufacturers in the South and Midwest and
is used in residential construction, roof trusses, and laminated beams.

Combined permitted annual production capacity of the two mills
increased from 226 MMBF at year-end 1999 to 350 MMBF at year-end 2005 with a further increase to 390 MMBF at year-end 2006 following the completion of the majority of planned upgrades at both mills, and was unchanged at year-end 2007. The
Companys lumber output decreased during 2007, with production totaling 213 MMBF compared to 253 MMBF in 2006 and 265 MMBF in 2005. The decrease in 2007 was due primarily to a fire that occurred in the planer section at the Companys Waldo
Mill on August 9, 2007. The mill was shut down while repairs were made, but was fully operational in late October 2007. (For additional information, see Note 20  Business Interruption and Involuntary Conversion.) With the softwood lumber
market declining in 2006 and 2007, the Company also decided to curtail production, focus on increasing efficiencies, and reduce controllable manufacturing cost.

Capital Projects. Deltic has invested significant capital in its sawmills in recent years to increase production capacity and efficiency, decrease costs, and expand the product mix. Major capital projects
completed at the Ola Mill over the past several years include: (1) installation of a curve-sawing gang and double-length infeed to improve log recovery, increase hourly output, and expand product mix; (2) the installation of an optimized
edger system to increase lumber recovery; (3) replacement of the planer mill with a high-speed planer mill and automated sorting system to increase mill output; (4) construction of a small log processing system which allows for the
efficient usage of small diameter logs, thus reducing average log costs; (5) addition of a boiler system and steam dry kilns to increase mill capacity and provide the capability to produce higher value lumber; (6) expansion of log storage
capacity to enable increased production as market conditions improve; (7) redesign and rebuild of the sawmill primary breakdown processing equipment to improve the infeed of logs and overall flow of green lumber; (8) installation of a
stick laying stacker to improve flow of lumber through the plant; and (9) gang control upgrade to improve operating efficiencies.

At
the Waldo Mill, major capital projects completed over the past several years include: (1) installation of a curve-sawing gang to improve log recovery, increase hourly output, and expand product mix; (2) installation of a new edger and optimizer
to improve recovery; (3) installation of a log optimization system to improve lumber recovery; (4) extension of the green lumber sorter to increase sawmill throughput; (5) addition of finger-jointing facilities which utilizes
short-trim material that would normally be waste; (6) replacement of the planer that was destroyed by fire in August 2007; (7) installation of a second log debarker in order to further improve hourly throughput capability; (8) addition of
a boiler and an upgrade of the lumber drying kilns to increase the mills lumber drying capacity; and (9) addition of an automatic stick-laying system and stacker/package maker.

Raw Materials. In 2007, the Companys two sawmills processed 944,252 tons of logs, obtained from either the timberlands or purchased from
public and private landowners. The timberlands supplied 58 percent, or 545,733 tons, of the mills raw material receipt requirements, while the mills obtained 90 percent of the 575,637 tons of pine sawtimber harvested from the timberlands.

Various factors, including environmental and endangered species concerns, have limited, and will likely continue to limit, the amount of
timber offered for sale by U.S. government agencies. Because of this reduced availability of federal timber for harvesting, the Company believes that its supply of timber from the timberlands is a significant competitive advantage. Deltic has
historically supplied a significant portion of the timber processed in the sawmills from its timberlands.

In order to operate its sawmills
economically, the Company relies on purchases of timber from third parties to supplement its own timber harvests from the timberlands. The Company has an active timber procurement function for each of its sawmills. As of December 31, 2007, the
Company had under contract 152,403 tons of timber on land owned by other parties, including the U.S. Forest Service, which is expected to be harvested over the next two years. During 2007, the Company harvested third-party stumpage and purchased
logs from third parties totaling 424,173 tons. Of this volume, purchases from the U.S. Forest Service represented ten percent. The balance of such purchased volume was acquired from private lands.



8



---

##### Table of Contents

As a result of the reduced availability of federal timber in recent years, demand, along with prices, for
privately owned timber has increased. The Company has increased and foresees further increases in its harvesting and purchasing activities from private timberlands. Due to this increased demand and higher timber prices, private timber sources have
been prompted to sell their timber commercially. As a result, Deltics sources of private timber are many and diverse. The key factors in a landowners determination of whether to sell timber to the Company are price, the Companys
relationships with logging contractors, and the ability of the Company to demonstrate the quality of its logging practices to landowners. As a result, a landowner will be more likely to sell timber to a forest products company whose own land has
been responsibly managed and harvested. There is a substantial amount of other private timber acreage in proximity to each of Deltics sawmills.

Residual Wood Products. The Company pursues waste minimization practices at both of its sawmills. Wood chips are usually sold to paper mills, wood shavings and chips are usually sold to Del-Tin Fiber, and bark
is frequently sold for use as fuel. Bark, sawdust, shavings, and wood chips that cannot be sold are used as hog fuel to fire the boilers that heat the drying kilns. The Company expects to continue to sell a significant portion of its
Waldo Mills residual wood shavings and chip production to Del-Tin Fiber pursuant to a fiber supply agreement whose current term is set to expire in 2008.

Transportation. Each mill facility has the capability to ship its lumber by truck or rail.

Cyclical Market. While the cyclicality of the lumber market may occasionally require the interruption of operations at one or both of the Companys sawmills, suspension of milling activities is unusual. Management is not
currently anticipating any interruption of operations at either of Deltics sawmills, but no assurance can be given that market conditions or other factors will not render such an action economically advisable in the future.

Real Estate

The Companys real estate
operations were started in 1985 to add value to former timberland strategically located in the growth corridor of west Little Rock, Arkansas. Development activities began with the construction of Chenal Ridge, the initial, 85-lot neighborhood in
Chenal Valley on the western edge of the Little Rock city limits as of 1985. Since that time the Company has been developing the remainder of Chenal Valley, a premier planned community, centered around two Robert Trent Jones, Jr. designed
championship golf courses with approximately 4,700 acres of residential and commercial properties. The first golf course was completed in 1990. Construction of the second course began in 2001, and was opened for play in the summer of 2003. The
property has been developed in stages, and real estate sales to date have consisted primarily of residential lots sold to builders or individuals and commercial tracts. In addition to Chenal Valley, Deltic has developed Chenal Downs, located just
outside of Chenal Valley, and is developing Red Oak Ridge, in Hot Springs, Arkansas. Chenal Downs is a 400-acre equestrian development with controlled access, featuring secluded, five-acre lots. Red Oak Ridge, Deltics first development outside
the Little Rock area, is an 800-acre upscale community designed for residential, resort, or retirement living. During 2007, the Company and Central Arkansas Water entered into a full and complete settlement of a pending condemnation litigation
involving 680 acres of undeveloped real estate within the watershed of Lake Maumelle in western Pulaski County, Arkansas. Approximately 640 acres were part of a planned development of the Company. (For additional information See Note 21 
Commitments and Contingencies.)

Chenal Valley is a premier upscale residential and commercial development in the Little Rock real estate
market. All developed acreage in Chenal Valley has been annexed by the City of Little Rock. Red Oak Ridge has been similarly annexed by the City of Hot Springs. Chenal Downs is located just outside the Little Rock city limits.

Residential Development. Lots were offered for sale in Chenal Valley during the second half of 1986 with closings beginning in 1987. As of
December 31, 2007, 2,644 lots have been developed in 31 neighborhoods and 2,476 lots have been sold, with about 2,233 residences constructed or under construction. When fully developed, Chenal Valley will include approximately 4,600 residences.



9



---

##### Table of Contents

However, the actual number of residences in Chenal Valley will depend on final land usages and lot densities. The Company has developed lots in a wide
variety of market segments. Lot size has ranged from 0.2 acres to 2.25 acres, and lot price has ranged from $25,000 per lot to over $335,000 per lot.

The first phase of Chenal Downs was opened in December 1997, followed by a second phase in November 2000, with 61 of the 76 lots developed in the two phases sold by the end of 2007. Lot prices in Chenal Downs range
from $89,000 to approximately $187,000. In Red Oak Ridge, the first two neighborhoods were offered for sale in 1998, with a third neighborhood offered in late 2005. These neighborhoods offer a choice of either estate-sized homesites, with many
overlooking one of two Deltic-constructed lakes, or garden-home lots. As of the end of 2007, 72 of the 135 lots offered have been sold, and prices for lots currently offered range from about $30,000 to almost $183,000.

Commercial Development. Commercial development in Chenal Valley began with the construction of a Company-owned, 50,000-square-foot office
building, which was sold during 2000. Commercial activity to-date has consisted of the sale of approximately 300 acres, including six acres in 2005, 55 acres in 2006, and 26 acres in 2007. Commercial property sales to-date have consisted of retail
store locations, an office building constructed by the Company on a nine-acre site, multi-family residence sites, convenience store locations, a bank office building site, a site for a 38-acre open-air shopping center, and outparcels surrounding a
retail center constructed and owned by the Company. Under current development plans, Chenal Valley will include approximately 800 acres of commercial property when fully developed.

In 2006, the Company sold approximately 38 acres to RED Development LLC for the development of The Promenade at Chenal, an upscale lifestyle
shopping center. Construction of The Promenade at Chenal began in 2007 and is expected to be completed by late May 2008. This project is expected to further increase interest in the Companys additional 135 acres of
commercially-zoned property adjacent to the site.

The completion of construction of the initial section of Rahling Road, a major connector
street to Chenal Parkway, in 1998 provided greater access to Chenal Valleys commercial acreage. Located at the center of this commercial property is a Company-owned 35,000-square-foot retail center. The retail center was completed in early
2000 and offers retail space for lease. The center is surrounded by 16 outparcels, ranging in size from 0.2 to 1.8 acres. To-date, 11 of these outparcels have been sold.

No commercial acreage is included in Chenal Downs and Red Oak Ridge is planned to include a small amount of commercial property. The Company will begin to develop and offer commercial sites as population density
increases.

Infrastructure. Infrastructure and other improvements to support the development and sale of residential and commercial
property are funded directly by the Company and/or through real property improvement districts. Such properties are developed only when sufficient demand exists and substantially all infrastructure is completed. Future infrastructure investments are
primarily necessary for the development and sale of additional property.

Development Amenities. In connection with its Chenal
Valley development, the Company developed Chenal Country Club, consisting of the earlier-described golf courses, a clubhouse, and related facilities for use by club members. Since its original construction, Deltic has undertaken substantial
remodeling and expansion of the clubhouse as the club membership level has increased. In addition, the Company has built three community parks within the Chenal Valley development for the benefit of the residents of the currently developed
residential areas.

Chenal Downs has been developed around an equestrian center, consisting of stables and a training facility, and also
includes bridle trails throughout the development. Red Oak Ridges primary amenities currently consist of two lakes and a community park, constructed by the Company.

Home Construction. Historically, the Companys focus with regards to residential real estate development has been on lot development only. However, from time to time, Deltic constructs a limited number of
speculative homes within its Red Oak Ridge development located in Hot Springs, Arkansas.



10



---

##### Table of Contents

Future Development. A number of factors have added significant value to the undeveloped portion of
Chenal Valley. Such factors include: (1) the overall success of Chenal Valley as a residential development and its image as one of the premier developments in central Arkansas, (2) the continued westward growth of Little Rock, (3) the
Companys investment in infrastructure in the area, and (4) the established residential base which is now large enough to support commercial development. Management expects the undeveloped portion of Chenal Valley to provide growth and
development opportunities in the future.

Chenal Downs has been fully developed, but development of Red Oak Ridge is in the early stages,
consisting of the construction of two lakes as the core amenity, initial infrastructure placement, and the first three of several planned neighborhoods.

The Company owns approximately 57,000 mostly contiguous acres, the eastern border of which begins about two miles west of Chenal Valley. Continued development in the Highway 10 growth corridor of west Little Rock has
significantly affected land values in the area, and is expected to create real estate development opportunities for much of this land.

Undeveloped Acreage. The success of Chenal Valley has increased the value of the Companys undeveloped real estate surrounding and within the development. Sales of undeveloped real estate amounted to seven acres in 2005, zero
acres in 2006, and 680 acres in 2007.

Del-Tin Fiber

Deltic owns 50 percent of the membership interest of Del-Tin Fiber, a joint venture to manufacture and market MDF. The Del-Tin Fiber plant is located near El Dorado, Arkansas. Construction of the plant was completed,
and initial production began, in 1998. The plant is designed to have an annual capacity of 150 million square feet (MMSF), on a 3/4-inch basis, making it one of the largest plants of its type in the world.

From the time production began at Del-Tin Fiber in 1998 until the fourth quarter of 2003, both operating and financial performances were below the
expectations established at the time that the decision to construct the plant was made. As a result, on April 25, 2002, Deltic announced that Banc One Capital Markets, Inc. had been retained as financial advisor to assist in the evaluation of
strategic alternatives for the Companys investment in Del-Tin Fiber. Subsequently, Deltics management and Board of Directors completed its review of these strategic alternatives and announced the Company intended to exit the MDF business
upon the earliest and most reasonable opportunity provided by the market. As a result of this decision, the Companys evaluation of possible impairment of the carrying value of its investment in the joint-venture was based primarily upon the
estimated cash flows from a sale of the Companys interest during 2003 and resulted in a determination that the Companys investment was impaired as of December 31, 2002. The investment was written off to zero.

Due to the Companys commitment to fund its share of any of the facilitys operating working capital needs until the facility was able to
consistently generate sufficient funds to meet its cash requirements or Deltics ownership was sold, the Company recognized losses in Del-Tin Fiber equal to the extent of these advances during 2003. For the year of 2003, such advances
approximated the Companys equity share of losses for the plant; accordingly, the investment in Del-Tin Fiber at December 31, 2003, was zero. The Company also continued to utilize its management resources to work with Del-Tins
management and the joint-venture partner to improve operating performance at the plant. As a result of these improvements, on December 11, 2003, Deltics Board of Directors revised its intent regarding the Companys investment in
Del-Tin Fiber and ceased efforts to sell the Companys interest in the joint venture, while continuing to focus on improving operating and financial results of the plant. Due to this decision, the 2003 evaluation of fair value for the
investment was based primarily upon the future net cash flows from Del-Tin Fibers operations over the remaining life of the plant. From 2004 through 2007, the Company recorded its equity share of the operating results of the joint venture.



11



---

##### Table of Contents

Medium Density Fiberboard. MDF, which is used primarily in the furniture, flooring, and molding
industries, is manufactured from sawmill residuals such as chips, shavings, and sawdust, pressed and held together by an adhesive bond. Although the technology has existed for decades, recent improvements in the manufacture of MDF have increased
both the quality and consistency of the product. MDF, with its real wood appearance and the ability to be finely milled and accept a variety of finishes, competes primarily with lumber.

Production. The plant produced 117 MMSF of MDF in 2007 versus 147 MMSF of MDF in 2006 and 141 MMSF of MDF in 2005. Due to market conditions in
2007, plant production was reduced. Prior to 2003, start-up difficulties and operational problems with the plants press and heat energy system limited production to levels significantly below capacity. The problems with the press were
corrected in mid-1999. As natural gas prices escalated during the last half of 2000, the decision was made in late January 2001 to temporarily suspend operations until the heat energy system could be modified. Following completion of a capital
project to modify this system, the plant resumed operations in June 2001. Rectification of the heat energy system has enabled the plants operations to increase production levels closer to the plants capacity of 150 MMSF per year, as
market conditions improved. In addition, manufacturing cost per thousand square feet has decreased, as certain variable costs of manufacturing have been lowered and fixed costs for the facility are being allocated to the increased production.

Raw Materials. The Del-Tin plant provides an additional outlet for wood chip production from the Waldo Mill. Pursuant to a fiber
supply agreement whose current term is set to expire in 2008, the Company has agreed to sell, and Del-Tin Fiber to buy, a substantial amount of residual shavings and wood chips from the Waldo Mill. In addition, Del-Tin Fiber has an option to
purchase residual wood chips from the Ola Mill. During 2007, 2006, and 2005, Deltic sold approximately $3,772,000, $3,939,000, and $3,868,000, respectively, of these lumber manufacturing by-products to Del-Tin Fiber.

Products and Competition

The Companys
principal forest products are timber, timberland, softwood lumber products (primarily finished lumber), residual wood products, and real estate.

Timber. Timber harvested from the timberlands is utilized by the Companys sawmills or sold to third parties. The Companys timber sales to third parties accounted for approximately six percent of consolidated net sales in
2005 and 2006, and eight percent in 2007.

The Company competes in the domestic timber market with numerous private industrial and
non-industrial land and timber owners. Competitive factors with respect to the domestic timber market generally include price, species and grade, proximity to wood manufacturing facilities, and accessibility.

Land Sales. Timberland sold by the Company to third parties consists of both non-strategic timberland, including hardwood bottomland suitable for
recreational use, and lands with potential for higher and better use, and amounted to less than one percent of consolidated net sales in 2005 and 2006 and one percent in 2007.

Lumber Products. The Companys sawmills produce a wide variety of products, including dimension lumber, boards, timbers, decking, and
secondary products such as finger-jointed studs. Lumber is sold primarily to wholesaler distributors, lumber treaters, and truss manufacturers in the South and Midwest and is used in residential construction, roof trusses, and laminated beams.
During 2005, 2006, and 2007, lumber sales as a percentage of consolidated net sales were approximately 60 percent, 56 percent, and 50 percent, respectively.

The forest products market is highly competitive with respect to price and quality of products. In particular, competition in the commodity-grade lumber market in which the Company competes is primarily based on
price. Deltic competes with other publicly held forest products companies operating in the U.S., many of which have significantly greater financial resources than the Company,



12



---

##### Table of Contents

as well as privately held lumber producers. The Company also competes with producers in Canada and overseas, regions that have increased their share of the
U.S. lumber market in recent years. In addition, Deltics management expects the Companys products to experience additional increased competition from engineered wood products and other substitute products. Due to the geographic location
of Deltics timberlands and its high-quality timber, in addition to the Companys active timber management program, strategically located and efficient sawmill operations, and highly motivated workforce, Deltic has been able to compete
effectively.

Residual Wood Products. The Companys sawmills produce wood chips, shavings, sawdust, and bark as by-products of
the conversion process. During 2005, 2006, and 2007, sales of these residual products accounted for nine percent, eight percent, and nine percent, respectively, of Deltics consolidated net sales. Wood chips are the primary source of residual
sales and are typically sold to Del-Tin Fiber or to paper mills. In 2007, Deltics sawmills produced 271,725 tons of wood chips. The Company expects to continue to sell a significant portion of its wood chip production to Del-Tin Fiber for use
in the production of MDF.

Real Estate. The Company develops and markets residential lots and commercial sites. Deltic generally
provides the supporting infrastructure. Residential lots are sold to homebuilders and individuals, while commercial sites are sold to developers and businesses. The Company also sells undeveloped acreage. During 2005, 2006, and 2007, the sales of
residential lots, commercial sites, and undeveloped acreage as a percentage of consolidated net sales were 15 percent, 17 percent, and 17 percent, respectively. The sale of commercial property can have a significant impact on the Companys
sales, but is unpredictable and irregular.

Seasonality

The Companys operating segments are subject to variances in financial results due to several seasonal factors. The majority of timber sales are typically generated in the first half of the year due primarily to
weather conditions and historically stronger timber prices. Increased housing starts during the spring usually push lumber prices up. Forestry operations generally incur expenses related to silvicultural treatments, which are applied during the fall
season to achieve maximum effectiveness.

Business Segment Data

Information concerning net sales, operating income, and identifiable assets attributable to each of the Companys business segments is set forth in Item 7, Managements Discussion and
Analysis; and Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of Part II of this report.

Environmental Matters

The Company is subject to extensive and changing federal, state, and local
environmental laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health and the environment, including laws relating to air and water emissions, the use of herbicides on timberlands, regulation of wetlands, and the protection of
endangered species. Environmental legislation and regulations, and the interpretation and enforcement thereof, are expected to become increasingly stringent. The Company has made, and will continue to make, expenditures to comply with such
requirements in the ordinary course of its operations. Historically, these expenditures have not been material and the Company expects that this will continue to be the case. Liability under certain environmental regulations may be imposed without
regard to fault or the legality of the original actions, and may be joint and several with other responsible parties. As a result, in addition to ongoing compliance costs, the Company may be subject to liability for activities undertaken on its
properties prior to its ownership or operation and by third parties, including tenants. The Company is not involved with any such sites as of this time. The Company leases the rights to drill for oil and gas on some of its lands to third parties.
Pursuant to these leases, the lessee indemnifies the Company from environmental liability relating to the lessees operations. Based on its present knowledge,



13



---

##### Table of Contents

including the fact the Company is not currently aware of any facts that indicate the Company will be required to incur any material costs relating to
environmental matters, and currently applicable laws and regulations, the Company believes environmental matters are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

In addition, the federal Endangered Species Act protects species threatened with possible extinction and restricts timber
harvesting activities on private and federal lands. Certain of the Companys timberlands are subject to such restrictions due to the presence on the lands of the red-cockaded woodpecker, a species protected under the Act. There can be no
assurance that the presence of this species or the discovery of other protected species will not subject the Company to future harvesting restrictions. However, based on the Companys knowledge of its timberlands, the Company does not believe
that its ability to harvest its timberlands will be materially adversely effected by the protection of endangered species.

Access to SEC Filings

The Company maintains an internet website at www.deltic.com. The Company makes available free of charge under the Investor Relations
section of its website its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to any of those reports and other filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after providing such reports to
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Employees

As of January 31, 2008, the Company had 465 employees.



14



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 1A. | Risk Factors
|-------- | ------------

Cyclicality of Forest Products
Industry

The Companys results of operations are, and will continue to be, affected by the cyclical nature of the forest products
industry. Prices and demand for logs and manufactured wood products have been, and in the future can be expected to be, subject to cyclical fluctuations. The demand for logs and lumber is primarily affected by the level of new residential
construction activity, which activity is subject to fluctuations due to changes in economic conditions, mortgage interest rates, population growth, weather conditions and other factors. Decreases in the level of residential construction activity
usually will be reflected in reduced demand for logs and lumber resulting in lower prices for the Companys products and lower revenues, profits, and cash flows. In addition to housing starts, demand for wood products is also significantly
affected by repair and remodeling activities and industrial uses, demand for which has historically been less cyclical. Furthermore, changes in industry supply of timber have an effect on prices. Although the Company believes sales of timber by
United States government agencies will remain at relatively low levels for the foreseeable future, any reversal of policy that substantially increased such sales could significantly reduce prices for logs and lumber, which could have a material
adverse effect on the Company. Furthermore, increased imports from Canada and other foreign countries could reduce the prices the Company receives for its products.

Limitations on the Companys Ability to Harvest Timber

Revenues from the Companys future
operations will depend to a significant extent on its ability to harvest timber pursuant to its harvest plans from its 438,600 acres of timberlands (the Timberlands). Harvesting of the Timberlands may be affected by various natural
factors, including damage by fire, insect infestation, disease, prolonged drought, severe weather conditions including ice storms and other causes. The effects of such natural disasters may be particularly damaging to young timber. To the extent
possible, the Company implements measures to limit the risk of damage from such natural causes. The Company is a participant with state agencies and other timberland owners in cooperative fire fighting and fire surveillance programs. In addition,
the Timberlands extensive system of access roads and the physical separation of various tracts provide some protection against fire damage. Nonetheless, one or more major fires on the Timberlands could adversely affect Deltics operating
results. In addition, the Timberlands may also be affected by insect infestation, particularly by the southern pine beetle, and disease. Additionally, the Timberlands may be affected by severe weather conditions, especially ice storms, tornados, and
heavy winds. Although damage from such natural causes usually is localized and affects only a limited percentage of the timber, there can be no assurance that any damage affecting the Timberlands will, in fact, be so limited. As is typical in the
forest products industry, the Company does not maintain insurance coverage with respect to damage to the Timberlands. The Company does, however, maintain insurance for loss of logs due to fire and other occurrences following their receipt at the
Companys sawmills.

Operation of Sawmills

The Companys sawmills are located at Ola in central Arkansas and Waldo in southern Arkansas. The operations of the sawmills are dependent on various factors and there can be no assurance that the Company will be
able to continue such operations at current levels of production or that suspension of such operations may not be required in the future. One such factor is the ability of the Company to procure sufficient logs at suitable prices. The Company
obtains logs for its sawmills from the Timberlands, other private sources, and federal lands. As discussed above, prices for logs are cyclical and affected primarily by demand for lumber and other products produced from logs. Another such factor is
the ability of the Company to find an outlet for the large volume of residual wood products that result from the milling process. The company currently markets such products to third parties for the production of paper and other uses. The Company
sells a significant portion of its residual wood chips to Del-Tin Fiber L.L.C. (Del-Tin), a joint venture medium density fiberboard plant near El Dorado, Arkansas, in which the Company owns a 50-percent interest. In addition, the
continued operation of the sawmills is subject generally to the risk of business interruption in the event of a fire or other natural disaster, regulatory actions, or other causes. The Company mitigates this risk through the procurement of casualty
and business interruption insurance.



15



---

##### Table of Contents

Del-Tin Fiber

Deltic owns 50 percent of the membership interest of Del-Tin Fiber, a joint venture to manufacture and market MDF. The Del-Tin Fiber plant is located near El Dorado, Arkansas. Construction of the plant was completed,
and initial production began, in 1998. From the time production began at Del-Tin Fiber until the fourth quarter of 2003, both operating and financial performances were below the expectations established at the time the decision to construct the
plant was made. Contributions to Del-Tin Fiber by the Company through the third quarter of 2003 amounted to $60.7 million. The operating and financial performance of the joint venture improved significantly in 2004 through 2007 when compared to
prior years. These advances were the result of price improvements in the MDF market, product mix, and the Companys utilization of its management resources to work with Del-Tins management and the joint-venture partner to improve
operating performance at the plant. As a result, the impact of Del-Tin Fiber on the Companys results of operations and cash flows was significantly reduced during the years of 2004 through 2007. Although the Company remains focused on the
efficient operations of the facility, changes in MDF prices or disruptions in manufacturing operations at the plant could impact the Companys results of operations and cash flows in future periods, as well as Deltics ability to exit the
MDF business if desired in the future.

Competition

The forest products industry is highly competitive in terms of price and quality. The products of the Company are subject to increasing competition from a variety of non-wood and engineered wood products. In addition,
the Company is subject to a potential increase in competition from lumber products and logs imported from foreign sources. Any significant increase in competitive pressures from substitute products or other domestic or foreign suppliers could have a
material adverse effect on the Company.

Federal and State Environmental Regulations

The Company is subject to extensive and changing federal, state, and local environmental laws and regulations relating to the protection of human health
and the environment, the provisions and enforcement of which are expected to become more stringent in the future. The Company has made and will continue to make non-material expenditures to comply with such provisions. Based on currently available
information, including the fact that the Company is not presently aware of any facts that indicate the Company will be required to incur any material costs relating to environmental matters, the Company believes environmental regulation will not
materially adversely effect the Company, but there can be no assurances that environmental regulation will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company in the future.

Geographic Concentration and Risk Associated with Real Estate Development

The Companys real estate development projects are located in central Arkansas, specifically in, and west of, Little Rock, Arkansas, and in Hot
Springs, Arkansas. Accordingly, the Companys real estate operations are particularly vulnerable to any economic downturns or other adverse events that may occur in this region and to competition from nearby residential housing developments.
The Companys results of operations may be affected by the cyclicality of the homebuilding and real estate industries generally. Factors include changes in general and local economic conditions, such as employment levels, consumer confidence
and income, housing demand, availability of financing and interest rates, and changes in government regulation regarding the environment, zoning, real estate taxes, and other local government fees.



16



---

##### Table of Contents

Reliance on Key Personnel

The Company believes that its continued success will depend in large part on its ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified personnel. The
Company offers management incentives in a manner that is directly linked to the Companys performance, which the Company believes will facilitate the attraction, retention, and motivation of highly skilled and qualified personnel. In this
regard, the Company has taken steps to retain its key personnel, including the provision of competitive employee benefit programs. Although the Company will seek to employ qualified individuals in the event that officers or other key employees of
the Company cease to be associated with the Company, there can be no assurance that such individuals could be engaged by the Company.

Dividend Policy

The Company currently intends to pay modest quarterly cash dividends. However, the Company anticipates that
future earnings will, for the most part, be used to support operations and finance growth of the business. The payment of any dividends will be at the discretion of the Companys Board of Directors (the Company Board). The
declaration of dividends and the amount thereof will depend on a number of factors, including the Companys financial condition, capital requirements, funds from operations, future business prospects, and such other factors as the Company Board
may deem relevant, and no assurance can be given as to the timing or amount of any dividend payments.

Anti-Takeover Effects of Certain
Statutory, Charter, Bylaw and Contractual Provisions

Several provisions of the Companys Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
and of the Delaware General Corporation Law could discourage potential acquisition proposals and could deter or delay unsolicited changes in control of the Company, including provisions creating a classified Board of Directors, limiting the
stockholders powers to remove directors, and prohibiting the taking of action by written consent in lieu of a stockholders meeting. The preferred stock purchase rights attached to the Companys common stock could have similar
anti-takeover effects. In addition, the Companys Board has the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to fix the rights and preferences of and to issue preferred stock. The issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the
voting power of the owners of Companys common stock, including the loss of voting control to others. Transactions subject to these restrictions will include, among other things, the liquidation of the Company, the merger, consolidation or
other combination or affiliation of the Company with another company, discontinuance of or material change in the conduct of a material portion of its businesses independently and with its own employees, redemption or other reacquisition of
Companys common stock, and the sale, distribution, or other disposition of assets of the Company out of the ordinary course of business.

These provisions and others that could be adopted in the future could discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or delay or prevent changes in control or management of the Company, including transactions in which stockholders might
otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices. In addition, these provisions could limit the ability of stockholders to approve transactions that they may deem to be in their best interests.



17



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments
|-------- | -------------------------

None.



|Item 2. | Properties
|------- | ----------

The Companys properties,
primarily located in Arkansas and north Louisiana, consist principally of fee timber and timberlands, purchased stumpage inventory, two sawmills, and land held for residential and commercial development and sale. As of December 31, 2007, the
Companys gross investment in timber and timberlands; gross property, plant, and equipment; and investment in real estate held for development and sale consisted of the following:



|                                          |  |   |         
|----------------------------------------- |  | - | --------
|(Thousands of dollars)                    |  |  
|Timberlands                               |  | $ | 81,514  
|Fee timber and logging facilities         |  |   | 209,971 
|Purchased stumpage inventory              |  |   | 3,457   
|Real estate held for development and sale |  |   | 46,048  
|Land and land improvements                |  |   | 4,953   
|Buildings and structures                  |  |   | 9,932   
|Machinery and equipment                   |  |   | 90,180  
|                                          |  |   |         
|                                          |  |   | $446,055
|                                          |  |   |         

Timberlands consist of the historical cost of land on which fee timber is grown and
related land acquisitions stated at acquisition cost. Fee timber consists of the historical cost of company standing timber inventory, including capitalized reforestation costs, and related timber acquisitions stated at acquisition cost.
Logging facilities consist primarily of the costs of roads constructed and other land improvements. Purchased stumpage inventory consists of the purchase price paid for third-party timber, net of amounts harvested. Real
estate held for development and sale consist primarily of the unamortized costs, including amenities, incurred to develop the real estate for sale and a retail center held for sale. Land and land improvements consist primarily of
improvements at the Companys two sawmill locations. Buildings and structures and Machinery and equipment primarily consist of the sawmill buildings and equipment and the Companys two real estate sales offices.

The Company owns all of the properties discussed above. The Companys properties are not subject to mortgages or other forms of debt
financing. (For further information on the location and type of the Companys properties, see the descriptions of the Companys operations in Item 1.)



|Item 3. | Legal Proceedings
|------- | -----------------

From time to time, the Company
is involved in litigation incidental to its business. Currently, there are no material legal proceedings.



|Item 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|------- | ---------------------------------------------------

None.



18



---

##### Table of Contents

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The age (at January 1, 2008), present corporate office, and length of service in office of each of the Companys executive officers and persons chosen to become officers are reported in the following
listing. Executive officers are elected annually but may be removed from office at any time by the Board of Directors.

Ray C. Dillon - Age
52; President and Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company effective July 1, 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Dillon was employed at Gaylord Container Corporation, where from April, 2000 through December, 2002, he was
Executive Vice President, and preceding his election as Executive Vice President, he was Vice President, Primary Product Operations from April 1997.

Kenneth D. Mann - Age 48; Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, effective May 1, 2007. From September 1, 2004 to April 30, 2007, Mr. Mann was Controller. From September 1,
2002, to September 2004, Mr. Mann was Manager of Corporate Governance and Investor Relations. From January 1997 to September 2002, Mr. Mann was Assistant Controller.

Phillip A. Pesek - Age 51; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary effective October 22, 2007. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Pesek
was Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of Anthony Forest Products Company, and before that, worked in various legal roles for The Home Depot, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and Dillards, Inc.

Kent L. Streeter - Age 47; Vice President of Operations effective November 16, 2003. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Streeter was Operations
Manager of a large paper mill located in the Southeastern United States from January 1997, which has been owned since April 2002, by Temple-Inland, Inc. and prior to that by Gaylord Container Corporation.

David V. Meghreblian - Age 49; Vice President of Real Estate effective November 16, 2003. From May 2000 to November 2003, Mr. Meghreblian was
Vice President of Operations for the Company. From November 1996 to April 2000, Mr. Meghreblian was General Manager of Planning and Investor Relations for Deltic. Prior to such time, Mr. Meghreblian was General Manager of Project
Development, a position he held beginning in November 1995.

Byrom L. Walker - Age 46; Controller effective May 1, 2007.
Mr. Walker had been Manager of Financial Reporting since he joined the Company in early 2006. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Walker was Corporate Controller from 2004 for Teris, L.L.C., a division of Suez S.A.

Clefton D. Vaughan - Age 66; Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 1997. From October 1994 to December 1996,
Mr. Vaughan was Vice President of Murphy Oil Corporation, a position he also held from 1989 through October 1992. From October 1992 to October 1994, Mr. Vaughan was Vice President of Murphy Exploration & Production Company.
Mr. Vaughan retired effective May 1, 2007.

W. Bayless Rowe - Age 55; Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary effective
May 1, 2000. From January 1, 1997 to April 2000, Mr. Rowe was General Counsel and Secretary for the Company. From 1988 to December 1996, Mr. Rowe was Secretary and General Attorney of Murphy Oil Corporation. Mr. Rowe retired
effective November 1, 2007.



19



---

##### Table of Contents

PART II



|Item 5. | Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Common stock of Deltic Timber Corporation is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol DEL. The following table sets forth the high, low, and
closing prices, along with the quarterly dividends declared, for each of the quarters indicated:



|               |  |               |       |                          |       |        |       |  |      
|-------------- |  | ------------- | ----- | ------------------------ | ----- | ------ | ----- |  | -----
|               |  | Sales Prices1 |       | Dividend perCommon Share
|               |  | High          |       | Low                      |       | Close2 |      
|2007           |  |               |       |                          |       |        |       |  |      
|First Quarter  |  | $             | 56.60 |                          | 46.15 |        | 47.96 |  | .0750
|Second Quarter |  | $             | 57.87 |                          | 47.03 |        | 54.82 |  | .0750
|Third Quarter  |  | $             | 62.83 |                          | 50.91 |        | 56.92 |  | .0750
|Fourth Quarter |  | $             | 59.83 |                          | 45.46 |        | 51.49 |  | .0750
|2006           |  |               |       |                          |       |        |       |  |      
|First Quarter  |  | $             | 60.60 |                          | 50.01 |        | 60.60 |  | .0750
|Second Quarter |  | $             | 60.99 |                          | 51.99 |        | 56.37 |  | .0750
|Third Quarter  |  | $             | 56.87 |                          | 45.20 |        | 47.66 |  | .0750
|Fourth Quarter |  | $             | 56.28 |                          | 47.02 |        | 55.78 |  | .0750



|1 | Daily closing price.
|- | --------------------

|2 | At period end.
|- | --------------

Common stock dividends were declared for each quarter during 2007 and 2006. As of January 31, 2008, there were approximately 1,154 stockholders of record of Deltics common stock.

In December 2000, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase plan of up to $10 million of Deltic common stock. There is no stated expiration
dated regarding this authorization. During the first nine months of 2007, no shares were repurchased under this program. Information pertaining to this plan for the fourth quarter of 2007 is presented in the table below. On December 13, 2007,
Deltic announced an expansion of its repurchase program by $25 million.



|                   |  |                                |  |                            |  |                                                                            |  |                                                                                               |           
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------ |  | -------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------
|Period             |  | Total Numberof SharesPurchased |  | AveragePrice PaidPer Share |  | Total Number ofSharesPurchased asPart of PubliclyAnnouncedPlans orPrograms |  | Maximum Approximate DollarValue of Shares that May YetBe Purchased Under thePlans or Programs
|October 1 through  |  |                                |  |                            |  |                                                                            |  |                                                                                               |           
|October 31, 2007   |  |                               |  |                           |  |                                                                           |  | $                                                                                             | 7,851,000 
|                   |  |                                |  |                           
|November 1 through |  |                                |  |                            |  |                                                                            |  |                                                                                               |           
|November 30, 2007  |  | 53,021                         |  | 48.92                      |  | 52,906                                                                     |  | $                                                                                             | 5,262,694 
|                   |  |                                |  |                           
|December 1 through |  |                                |  |                            |  |                                                                            |  |                                                                                               |           
|December 31, 2007  |  | 49,008                         |  | 47.18                      |  | 49,008                                                                     |  | $                                                                                             | 27,950,461

Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans required
by this Item is contained in Item 12 of this Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.



20



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 6. | Selected Financial Data
|------- | -----------------------

The following table
presents certain selected consolidated financial data for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2007:



|                                                 |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | --------- | -
|(Thousands of dollars, except per share amounts) |  | 2007 |           |   | 2006 |           |   | 2005 |           |   | 2004 |           |   | 2003 |          
|Results of Operations for the Year               |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|Net sales                                        |  | $    | 128,255   |   |      | 153,112   |   |      | 168,350   |   |      | 142,017   |   |      | 134,915   |  
|Operating income                                 |  | $    | 19,959    |   |      | 18,721    |   |      | 26,257    |   |      | 23,155    |   |      | 23,857    |  
|Net income                                       |  | $    | 11,111    |   |      | 11,323    |   |      | 14,518    |   |      | 11,093    |   |      | 8,194     |  
|Comprehensive income                             |  | $    | 14,638    |   |      | 11,621    |   |      | 14,128    |   |      | 11,205    |   |      | 8,070     |  
|Earnings per common share                        |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|Basic                                            |  | $    | .89       |   |      | .91       |   |      | 1.18      |   |      | .92       |   |      | .69       |  
|Assuming dilution                                |  | $    | .89       |   |      | .89       |   |      | 1.17      |   |      | .91       |   |      | .69       |  
|Cash dividends declared per common share         |  | $    | .30       |   |      | .30       |   |      | .275      |   |      | .25       |   |      | .25       |  
|Net cash provided/(required) by                  |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|Operating activities                             |  | $    | 28,243    |   |      | 39,148    |   |      | 43,125    |   |      | 42,147    |   |      | 44,209    |  
|Investing activities                             |  | $    | (21,023   | ) |      | (24,234   | ) |      | (29,015   | ) |      | (15,723   | ) |      | (39,302   | )
|Financing activities                             |  | $    | (7,906    | ) |      | (5,192    | ) |      | (13,332   | ) |      | (27,252   | ) |      | (4,277    | )
|Percentage return on                             |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|Average stockholders equity                     |  |      | 5.1       |   |      | 5.5       |   |      | 7.6       |   |      | 6.3       |   |      | 5.0       |  
|Average borrowed and invested capital            |  |      | 5.7       |   |      | 5.6       |   |      | 7.4       |   |      | 6.2       |   |      | 5.3       |  
|Average total assets                             |  |      | 3.3       |   |      | 3.5       |   |      | 4.6       |   |      | 3.6       |   |      | 2.6       |  
|Capital Expenditures for the Year                |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|Woodlands                                        |  | $    | 4,978     |   |      | 3,333     |   |      | 7,062     |   |      | 6,686     |   |      | 12,408    |  
|Mills                                            |  |      | 5,345     |   |      | 8,763     |   |      | 10,732    |   |      | 4,797     |   |      | 3,405     |  
|Real Estate                                      |  |      | 10,171    |   |      | 15,612    |   |      | 15,379    |   |      | 12,519    |   |      | 11,198    |  
|Corporate                                        |  |      | 74        |   |      | 59        |   |      | 74        |   |      | 165       |   |      | 211       |  
|                                                 |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|                                                 |  | $    | 20,568    |   |      | 27,767    |   |      | 33,247    |   |      | 24,167    |   |      | 27,222    |  
|                                                 |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|Financial Condition at Year-End                  |  |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |   |      |           |  
|                                                 |  |      |           |   |     
|Working capital                                  |  | $    | 7,285     |   |      | 12,710    |   |      | 7,027     |   |      | 6,481     |   |      | 7,501     |  
|Current ratio                                    |  |      | 1.46 to 1 |   |      | 2.15 to 1 |   |      | 1.57 to 1 |   |      | 1.73 to 1 |   |      | 2.08 to 1 |  
|Total assets                                     |  | $    | 328,744   |   |      | 324,266   |   |      | 316,327   |   |      | 307,580   |   |      | 313,350   |  
|Long-term debt                                   |  | $    | 66,667    |   |      | 70,000    |   |      | 74,500    |   |      | 85,724    |   |      | 115,056   |  
|Stockholders equity                             |  | $    | 218,086   |   |      | 207,481   |   |      | 198,244   |   |      | 184,091   |   |      | 169,470   |  
|Long-term debt to stockholders equity ratio     |  |      | .306 to 1 |   |      | .337 to 1 |   |      | .376 to 1 |   |      | .466 to 1 |   |      | .679 to 1 |  



21



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 7. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Introduction

Deltic Timber Corporation (Deltic or the Company) is a
natural resources company engaged primarily in the growing and harvesting of timber and the manufacture and marketing of lumber. Deltic owns approximately 438,600 acres of timberland, primarily in Arkansas and north Louisiana. The Companys
sawmill operations are located at Ola in central Arkansas (the Ola Mill) and at Waldo in south Arkansas (the Waldo Mill). In addition to its timber and lumber operations, the Company is engaged in real estate development in
central Arkansas. The Company also holds a 50 percent interest in Del-Tin Fiber L.L.C. (Del-Tin Fiber), a joint venture to manufacture and market medium density fiberboard (MDF). Deltic is a calendar-year company for both
financial and income tax reporting.

The Company is organized into four segments: (1) Woodlands, which manages the Companys
timberlands; (2) Mills, which consists of Deltics two sawmills that manufacture a variety of softwood lumber products; (3) Real Estate, which includes the Companys real estate developments and a related country club operation;
and (4) Corporate, which consists of executive management, accounting, information systems, human resources, purchasing, treasury, income tax, and legal staff functions that provide support services to the operating business units. (The Company
currently does not allocate the cost of maintaining these support functions to its operating units.)

The Companys timberlands
consist primarily of Southern Pine, known in the industry as a type of softwood. Deltic considers its timberlands to be the Companys most valuable asset and the harvest of stumpage to be its most significant source of income;
accordingly, Deltic actively manages its timberlands to increase productivity and maximize the long-term value of these timber assets. The Company harvests timber from the timberlands in accordance with its harvest plans and sells such timber in the
domestic market or converts it to lumber in its sawmills. Stumpage supplied to the Companys sawmills is transferred at prices that approximate market. The Company implemented a timberland acquisition program in late 1996, and this ongoing
program has enabled the Company, when desired, to increase harvest levels, while expanding its timber inventory. Thus far, the Company has focused its acquisition program on timberland in its current operating area.

The Companys two sawmills employ modern technology in order to improve efficiency, reduce labor costs, maximize utilization of the timber resource,
and maintain high standards for production quality with safety being one of its highest priorities. In addition, each mill is strategically located near significant portions of the Companys timberlands. The mills produce a variety of lumber
products, including dimension lumber, boards, timbers, and decking. These lumber products are sold primarily to wholesale distributors, lumber treaters, and truss manufacturers in the South and mid-western United States and are used mainly in
residential construction, roof trusses, and laminated beams.

The Companys real estate operations were started in 1985 to maximize
the value of former timberland strategically located in the growth corridor of west Little Rock, Arkansas. Since that time, the Company has been developing Chenal Valley, a premier planned community consisting of 4,700 acres of residential and
commercial properties. The property is being developed in stages, and real estate sales to date have consisted primarily of residential lots, which are sold to builders or individuals, and commercial sites. In addition to Chenal Valley, Deltic has
developed Chenal Downs, a 400-acre development located just outside Chenal Valley, and is developing Red Oak Ridge, an 800-acre development in Hot Springs, Arkansas.

The Del-Tin Fiber plant is located near El Dorado, Arkansas. Construction of the plant was completed, and initial production began in 1998. The plant is designed to have a rated annual production capacity of
150 million square feet (MMSF) of 3/4 inch MDF, making it one of the largest plants of its type in the world. MDF, which is used primarily in the furniture, flooring, and molding industries, is manufactured from sawmill residuals
such as chips, shavings, and sawdust, pressed and held together by an adhesive bond.



22



---

##### Table of Contents

Executive Overview

Deltic is primarily a wood products producer operating in a commodity-based business environment, with a major diversification in real estate development. This environment is affected by a number of factors, including
general economic conditions, interest rates, imports, foreign exchange rates, housing starts, residential repair and remodeling, commercial construction, industry capacity and production levels, the availability of raw material, and weather
conditions. Given its relative size and the nature of most commodity markets, the Company has little or no influence over the markets pricing levels for its wood products. Accordingly, the Company will continually seek to reduce controllable
costs and expenses from its manufacturing processes. Sales of real estate are affected by general economic conditions and interest rates; specifically as such factors are manifested in the Companys operating area of central Arkansas.

Significant accomplishments for the Companys operating segments during the year of 2007 include: (1) the Woodlands segment
maximized the income contribution realized from the harvest of pine pulpwood by achieving an average sales price per ton that was 60 percent higher than in 2006; (2) the Mills segment continued to improve operating efficiencies and reduced unit
manufacturing costs, which contributed to this segments positive cash flow in 2007 despite depressed average sales realizations; (3) the Real Estate segment sold two commercial sites totaling approximately 26 acres for use as multifamily
housing, one of which will be the first condominium project on the golf courses in Deltics Chenal Valley development, and (4) the sale of 680 acres of undeveloped real estate acreage to Central Arkansas Water, settling pending condemnation
litigation.

The Woodlands segment continued its trend of steady contributions to earnings during the current year. The 2007 pine sawtimber
harvest volume decreased slightly to 576,000 tons when compared to 2006s volume of 580,000 tons, and the average sales price decreased 11 percent to $40 per ton. Despite the decline in the average pine sawtimber sales price, the segments
2007 overall operating income increased by $2.2 million. The improvement was primarily due to increased harvest volumes and a higher average per-ton sales price for pulpwood; increased sales of non-strategic hardwood bottomland; higher revenues from
hunting and oil and gas leases, easements and rights-of-way; and increased other revenues resulting from the natural gas drilling activity occurring on the Companys fee lands, including damages for acreage taken out of timber production for
wellsite locations, fees for allowing seismic testing, and usage of water in the actual drilling of wells. Deltic expects the markets for residential housing and lumber to remain depressed through 2008; therefore, prices received for pine sawtimber
harvested for this period are not expected to improve from current levels.

While lumber production levels within a region can influence
pine sawtimber prices, lumber prices typically do not. Over the long-term, there is a fundamental correlation between the level of lumber prices and pine sawtimber prices. However, in the short-term, the geographical size differential between the
lumber and pine sawtimber markets results in the two acting somewhat independently of each other. Pine sawtimber markets operate primarily within local or regional areas with sales being mainly to sawmills. These mills are subject to a relatively
fixed level of demand for raw materials that is driven by the facilities required production levels. Changes in pricing levels within the lumber market typically do not have an immediate effect on the existing demand for raw materials in the
short-term; therefore, the resulting impact on pine sawtimber prices will usually lag in timing and be less volatile than the market for lumber. This trend would typically also be true in the short-term during times of a depressed lumber market.

Ultimately, the Companys ability to sell pine sawtimber at acceptable prices in the future will be dependent upon the size or
existence of markets for manufactured lumber and other wood products. The Company plans to continue managing the harvest level of its forests on a sustainable-yield basis.

Timberland designated as higher and better use consists of tracts with market values that exceed the lands worth as a timber growing platform.
Deltics approximately 57,000-acre timberland holdings in the expanding westward growth corridor of Little Rock, Arkansas, is an example of such land. Non-strategic timberland is composed primarily of hardwood bottomland acreage not suitable
for the growing of pine timber for which the demand by recreational users for hunting, etc. has increased in recent years or tracts too small to allow efficient timber management, those geographically isolated from other Company fee lands, or any
other acreage not



23



---

##### Table of Contents

deemed strategic to Deltics operations or growth. Deltic sold approximately 893 acres of this non-strategic hardwood timberland during 2007. It has
identified approximately 11,000 additional such acres; therefore, sales of these acres will continue in 2008 and beyond as the market is capable of absorbing.

In addition to pine and hardwood timber sales, revenues from hunting leases, mineral lease bonuses and royalties, and land easements, have historically provided additional income to Deltics Woodlands segment.
Recent advances in technology and increased pricing levels have resulted in the economic viability of expanded natural gas exploration within the state of Arkansas. One current area of activity, known as the Fayetteville Shale Play, is
an unconventional natural gas reservoir, ranging in depth from 1,300 feet to 6,500 feet, and is spread across multiple Arkansas counties. Deltic has leased approximately 31,700 acres in this area to various exploration enterprises and received
applicable lease bonus payments and the possibility of future royalty income should production be established. The Company continues to evaluate additional leasing requests within the currently defined boundary of the Fayetteville Shale Play,
although future leasing will probably not be significant within this boundary. The ultimate benefit to Deltic from these mineral leases remains speculative and unknown to the Company and is contingent on the successful extraction and sale of natural
gas from the area.

For the Mills segment, the status of the lumber market and the resulting impact on the Companys commodity
softwood lumber products will continue to impact operating strategies and financial results. By the end of 2007, the seasonally adjusted annual rate of housing starts had reached its lowest level in 16 years. Several of the factors affecting this
decline were stricter mortgage lending practices brought about by sub-prime loan failures, construction loan delinquencies that are causing lenders to tighten credit for new developments, increased home inventory levels, and economic concerns with
the U.S. economy. Consequently, the high demand and pricing levels for softwood lumber products experienced during 2004 and 2005 have steadily declined for the past two years. The segments 2007 average lumber sales price declined nine percent
when compared to 2006. As with any commodity market, the Company expects the historical volatility of lumber prices to continue in the future. Many industry analysts are projecting that the market for new housing will continue to decline through the
second quarter of 2008 and possibly the entire year. Other factors impacting future lumber prices include the level of production capacity utilized, decreased imports due the declining dollar, and the level of repair and remodeling activity.

Since commodity-based markets rarely benefit from real price growth, after inflation, Deltic has concentrated managements attention,
in regard to its manufacturing operations, on improving sales realizations through product and customer mix enhancements and improving production efficiencies and the cost structure at its lumber mills. The Company has achieved improved production
efficiencies at both of its sawmills, largely as a result of an intensive capital upgrade program over the past three years. This improvement has been more significant at the Ola Mill, as the upgrade program there has focused on maximizing hourly
productivity rates with the smaller log size available as raw material for the mill. In 2008, Deltic plans to install a new log bucking system at this sawmill, improving the log-to-lumber yield ratio there, and this addition will essentially
complete the currently planned upgrade program for this facility.

On August 9, 2007 the Waldo Mill incurred a fire in its planer mill
that destroyed the planer machine located there. Due to the inability to timely finish the rough lumber manufactured in the sawmill or store such lumber until a new planer machine could be manufactured and installed without incurring substantial
quality downgrades, the Company elected to shut down the Waldo Mill until the fire-related repairs could be made. Such repairs were completed at the end of October, and the mill resumed production at hourly production rates at or above pre-fire
levels. As a result of this three-month shutdown period, a decrease in the volume of finished lumber produced and sold for the year 2007 was reported by the Mills segment. This fire incident was fully insured by property damage and business
interruption policies. Proceeds received from these coverages made the mill whole from a financial perspective.

Sales activity levels for
the Companys real estate developments are affected by economic conditions that influence the level of housing starts in the central Arkansas region, including general economic conditions, housing inventories, and stricter lending requirements
for home buyers and builders. These conditions contributed to a decrease in the overall demand for residential lots in Chenal Valley, the largest of the Companys three active developments, as evidenced by Chenal Valleys 73 residential
lot closings.



24



---

##### Table of Contents

This was a reduction of 16 lots from 2006s level of 89 residential lot closings. As of December 31, 2007, there were 161 developed lots in Chenal
Valley uncommitted. The Company plans to develop 32 new lots during 2008 to maintain a specific mix of lot offerings. Ultimately, the impact to Deltics overall real estate business model from moderate fluctuations in the annual volumes of
residential lot sales is deemed minimal in light of the Companys continued focus on the long-term financial returns from the ultimate build-out of the Chenal Valley development. In Deltics other two active developments, Red Oak Ridge had
sales of seven lots and Chenal Downs had one lot sale. Deltic has 60 developed lots in Red Oak Ridge and 15 in Chenal Downs uncommitted as of year-end 2007. While Chenal Downs is fully developed, Deltic plans to develop additional lots within Red
Oak Ridge as demanded by market conditions. Actual future annual lot development levels will be dependent upon the demand for the Companys residential lots.

The Real Estate segments average sales price for residential lots sold in 2007 was $89,500 which was a decrease of 14 percent when compared to 2006, due to the current-year sales mix. Deltics lot
development plans provide for a mix of lot offerings that represent all real estate market segments for a planned community. Neighborhoods adjoining Chenal Country Clubs second 18-hole, championship golf course designed by Robert Trent Jones,
Jr. represent the highest priced market segment in the Chenal Valley development. Average prices for non-golf course lots are lower and vary between neighborhoods depending on other factors such as lot size and location. The mix of lot offerings for
any given year will be driven by lot inventory and expected demand.

During 2004, the Company disclosed plans for a 1,170-acre residential
development on a portion of its land holdings located within the Highway 10 growth corridor west of Chenal Valley. A portion of the development would have been located within the watershed of Lake Maumelle, a principal source of drinking water for
Little Rock. Even though the Companys development plans incorporated the most modern and proven best management practices to create a low impact development fully protective of water quality in the lake, and the local water utility, Central
Arkansas Water (CAW), had just commissioned preparation of a new comprehensive watershed management plan, the water utility nonetheless commenced an action in September 2005 to condemn approximately 680 acres of company land located
within the watershed, including approximately 640 acres in the planned development. On March 28, 2007, the Company and CAW entered into a full and complete settlement of the condemnation. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, the Company
sold CAW 680 acres of land for $8.2 million, and CAW granted to the Company a 90-year option to repurchase the land for the same consideration should CAW determine the land is not needed for watershed protection or should CAW cease to utilize the
land for such purpose.

Commercial real estate sales activity is by nature less predictable than residential activity. With the number of
residents in Chenal Valley and other west Little Rock areas growing steadily, and momentum created from previous sales of commercial acreage in the development, interest in the Companys remaining commercial acreage is increasing. The volume of
commercial sales totaled approximately 26 acres in 2007 versus 54.9 acres in 2006. The average sales price per acre decreased slightly from $248,400 for 2006 to $240,600 for 2007. Future pricing trends for commercial real estate sales are difficult
to predict and are influenced by multiple factors, which include intended use of the site, motivation of the purchaser, and property location and access. No commercial acreage is included in the Chenal Downs development. Red Oak Ridge includes a
small amount of commercial property, depending on actual final land usages. The Company will begin to develop and offer commercial sites as this developments population density increases.

Operating results for Del-Tin Fiber are affected primarily by the overall MDF market and plant operating performance. The largest market segment for MDF
is furniture manufacturers. However, the furniture market continues to receive pressure from imports. The market for traditional MDF board began the year of 2007 seasonally strong and remained relatively stable when compared to the lumber market, as
production volumes by producers remained in balance with consumption. The demand for thin board, used in store fixtures and laminated flooring, was strong for the entire year. Del-Tin continues to produce a significant percentage of this thin board
in its product mix and its strategy is to develop and grow market share for this product. The demand for MDF in 2008 is expected to be slightly below that during 2007, but would increase with any recovery in the housing market.



25



---

##### Table of Contents

Operationally, Del-Tin Fiber continued to make significant advances during 2007, with a focus on raising
the plants uptime percentage and increasing the premium grade production percentage. However, the cost structure of the plant was significantly affected by increases for raw material wood fiber and resin glue used in the manufacturing process.
The increase in wood fiber cost was due largely to a shortage of softwood residual wood chips as area lumber mills reduced production in reaction to lumber market conditions. As they reduced production levels, the volume of residual by-product chips
produced decreased proportionately. Conversely, area paper mills, who are primary consumers for these chips, continued to operate at normal production levels. As a result of this supply/demand imbalance, available wood fiber brought premium prices
for the entire year of 2007. Del-Tin Fiber had to compete with these paper mills for wood fiber for a significant portion of its raw material fiber needs, thus increasing its cost. In addition, Del-Tin Fiber obtains much of its wood fiber supply
from residual chips produced at Deltics Waldo Mill. Therefore, for the three-month period that this sawmill was shut down due to the fire there, Del-Tin Fiber had to purchase an even larger volume of fiber in the open market at longer
freight-haul distances. During 2007, the resin glue utilized to bond MDF in the manufacturing process increased significantly in price due to substantial price increases in methanol, which is a raw material used in the manufacture of the resin glue.

For 2008, wood fiber cost is expected to remain near current levels, while resin glue prices are projected to increase slightly.
Manufacturers have been able to recover a portion of their raw materials cost through price increases. While this raised average sales realizations, producers have actually incurred a decrease in operating margins over the past 12 months. This
environment is projected to result in additional closure of production capacity, which could further improve sales prices received. Del-Tin Fibers efforts will be concentrated on further improvements in its hourly productivity level and other
plant operating efficiencies, while making additional reductions in the plants manufacturing cost structure where possible.

Significant Events

On August 7, 2007, Deltic amended its revolving credit agreement with SunTrust Bank and other banks whereby the unsecured and
committed revolving credit facility was increased from $260 million to $300 million. An option to request an increase in the amount of aggregate revolving commitments from $300 million to $350 million was reinstated. The agreement, which was set to
expire on September 9, 2010, was extended to September 9, 2012. The funds available through this agreement will enable the Company to take full advantage of value-added growth opportunities as they present themselves.

On March 30, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with American AgCredit PCA to amend and restate the terms of the Companys Series A
Senior Notes (Notes) in the principal amount of $40 million. Under the new agreement, the Notes are due and payable December 18, 2016. Prior to the agreement, the Notes would have become due on December 18, 2008, pursuant to a
Note Purchase Agreement effective December 18, 1998. The interest rate for the Notes remains the same as under the 1998 agreement (6.66 percent) through December 18, 2008, and after that date the rate will be reduced to 6.10 percent for
the balance of the term of the Notes.

On April 6, 2004, RED Development LLC announced that it planned to purchase from Deltic a site
within Chenal Valley for The Promenade at Chenal, an upscale lifestyle shopping center. After extensive efforts by both parties, the sale of 38 acres of commercial property was closed on September 27, 2006. Construction began on the
shopping center in 2007 and is expected to be completed by late May 2008. The development of The Promenade at Chenal is strategic to Chenal Valley in that it is expected to further increase interest in the Companys additional 135
acres of commercially-zoned property adjacent to the site.

On August 26, 2004, Del-Tin Fiber successfully refinanced its existing
long-term debt by entering into a credit agreement consisting of a letter of credit and term loan with multiple lending institutions pursuant to which, $60 million of its $89 million industrial revenue bonds were redeemed. Under the new credit
agreement, the lenders, on September 1, 2004, loaned Del-Tin Fiber $30 million, which will be repayable over five years in equal quarterly installments that began on December 31, 2004, and issued on Del-Tin Fibers behalf, a letter of
credit in the amount of $29.7 million to support the remaining industrial revenue bonds originally issued in 1998 by Union County, Arkansas. This refinancing resulted in more favorable credit terms for the joint venture. The most



26



---

##### Table of Contents

notable was the removal of the remaining required bond sinking fund payments of $55.9 million due in 2005 under the prior debt facility. (For additional
information about the Companys investment in Del-Tin Fiber, refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.)

From the time
production began at Del-Tin Fiber in 1998 until the fourth quarter of 2003, both operating and financial performance was below the expectations established at the time that the decision to construct the plant was made. As a result, on April 25,
2002, Deltic announced that Banc One Capital Markets, Inc. had been retained as financial advisor to assist in the evaluation of strategic alternatives for the Companys investment in Del-Tin Fiber. Subsequently, Deltics management and
Board of Directors completed its review of these strategic alternatives and announced the Company intended to exit the MDF business upon the earliest, reasonable opportunity provided by the market. As a result of this decision, the Companys
evaluation of possible impairment of the carrying value of its investment in the joint-venture was based primarily upon the estimated cash flows from a possible sale of the Companys interest during 2003 and resulted in a determination that the
Companys investment was impaired as of December 31, 2002. The investment was written off, to zero, and the write-off amounted to $18.7 million before income taxes.

Due to the Companys commitment to fund its share of any of the facilitys operating working capital needs until the facility was able to
consistently generate sufficient funds to meet its cash requirements or Deltics ownership was sold, the Company recognized equity in Del-Tin Fiber equal to the extent of these advances during 2003. For the year of 2003, such advances
approximated the Companys equity share of losses for the plant. Accordingly, the investment in Del-Tin Fiber at December 31, 2003 was zero. The Company also continued to utilize its management resources to work with Del-Tins
management and the joint-venture partner to improve operating performance at the plant. As a result of these improvements, on December 11, 2003, Deltics Board of Directors revised its intent regarding the Companys investment in
Del-Tin Fiber and ceased efforts to sell the Companys interest in the joint venture, while continuing to focus on improving operating and financial results of the plant. Due to this decision, the 2003 evaluation of fair value for the
investment was based primarily upon the future net cash flows from Del-Tin Fibers operations over the remaining life of the plant. In 2004, the Company began recording its equity share of the operating results of the joint venture.

Results of Operations

In the following
tables, Deltics net sales and results of operations are presented for the three years ended December 31, 2007. Explanations of significant variances and additional analyses for the Companys consolidated and segmental operations
follow the tables.



|                                                |  |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ----- | - | ---- | ----- | - | ---- | ----- | -
|                                                |  | Years Ended December 31, |      
|(Millions of dollars, except per share amounts) |  | 2007                     |       |   | 2006 |       |   | 2005 |      
|Net sales                                       |  |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Woodlands                                       |  | $                        | 39.6  |   |      | 37.6  |   |      | 35.1  |  
|Mills                                           |  |                          | 79.3  |   |      | 101.9 |   |      | 121.2 |  
|Real Estate                                     |  |                          | 30.3  |   |      | 35.5  |   |      | 33.0  |  
|Eliminations                                    |  |                          | (20.9 | ) |      | (21.9 | ) |      | (20.9 | )
|                                                |  |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Net sales                                       |  | $                        | 128.3 |   |      | 153.1 |   |      | 168.4 |  
|                                                |  |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Operating income                                |  |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Woodlands                                       |  | $                        | 24.8  |   |      | 22.5  |   |      | 22.4  |  
|Mills                                           |  |                          | (3.0  | ) |      | (5.3  | ) |      | 6.3   |  
|Real Estate                                     |  |                          | 13.1  |   |      | 13.9  |   |      | 10.7  |  
|Corporate                                       |  |                          | (14.3 | ) |      | (13.1 | ) |      | (12.7 | )
|Eliminations                                    |  |                          | (.6   | ) |      | .7    |   |      | (.4   | )
|                                                |  |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Operating income                                |  |                          | 20.0  |   |      | 18.7  |   |      | 26.3  |  
|Equity in Del-Tin Fiber                         |  |                          | 1.7   |   |      | 2.9   |   |      |      |  
|Interest income                                 |  |                          | .8    |   |      | .5    |   |      | .2    |  
|Interest and other debt expense                 |  |                          | (5.1  | ) |      | (5.4  | ) |      | (5.8  | )
|Interest capitalized                            |  |                          | .7    |   |      | 1.2   |   |      |      |  
|Other income                                    |  |                          | .3    |   |      | .3    |   |      |      |  
|Income taxes                                    |  |                          | (7.3  | ) |      | (6.9  | ) |      | (6.2  | )
|                                                |  |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Net income                                      |  | $                        | 11.1  |   |      | 11.3  |   |      | 14.5  |  
|                                                |  |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Earnings per common share                       |  | $                        | .89   |   |      | .91   |   |      | 1.18  |  



27



---

##### Table of Contents

Consolidated

Net income for 2007 remained relatively flat when compared to 2006, decreasing $.2 million. Improved results for the Companys Woodlands and Mills segments were offset by lower results from the Real Estate
segment, increased general and administrative expenses, increased eliminations of intercompany profit on pine stumpage from fee timber in inventory at the mills, and decreased equity income in Del-Tin Fiber. The $3.2 million decrease in net income
for 2006, when compared to 2005, was primarily the result of a lower average lumber sales price for the Mills segment due to a weakened softwood lumber products market. The decrease for the Mills segment was partially offset by improved operating
income from the Companys Real Estate segment and increased equity in Del-Tin Fiber. The benefit from interest capitalized was due to a change in accounting policies. (For further discussion, refer to Note 19 to the consolidated financial
statements.)

Operating income for 2007 increased $1.3 million, or seven percent, when compared to 2006. The Woodlands segment increased
$2.3 million due primarily to increases in pulpwood revenues, sales of non-strategic hardwood bottomland, and lease income, partially offset by lower average per-ton sales price for pine sawtimber. Operating results for the Mills segment improved
$2.3 million mainly due to proceeds from insurance settlements on property damaged in the fire at the Waldo Mill and related business interruption insurance claims and a lower average production cost per MBF, partially offset by decreases in both
average lumber sales price and lumber sales volume. Real Estate operating income decreased $.8 million due to reduced sales of residential lots and commercial acreage, partially offset by sales of undeveloped real estate acreage. Corporate operating
expenses increased $1.2 million mainly due to higher general and administrative expenses. Operating income for 2006 decreased $7.6 million, or 29 percent, when compared to 2005. Results for the Woodlands segment were virtually unchanged, while the
Mills segments operating results decreased $11.6 million due primarily to the decrease in average lumber sales price. Real Estate operating income increased $3.2 million due to increased commercial acreage sales, partially offset by decreased
sales of residential lots and undeveloped real estate acreage. Corporate operating expense increased $.4 million due mainly to higher general and administrative expenses.

Woodlands

Selected financial and statistical data for the Woodlands segment is shown in the
following table.



|                                 |  |      |       |      |       |      |      
|-------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | ----- | ---- | -----
|                                 |  | 2007 |       | 2006 |       | 2005
|Net sales (millions of dollars)  |  |      |       |      |       |      |      
|Pine sawtimber                   |  | $    | 23.2  |      | 26.1  |      | 26.0 
|Pine pulpwood                    |  |      | 6.1   |      | 3.5   |      | 2.7  
|Hardwood sawtimber               |  |      | .4    |      | .5    |      | .9   
|Hardwood pulpwood                |  |      | .8    |      | .5    |      | .6   
|                                 |  |      |      
|Sales volume (thousands of tons) |  |      |       |      |       |      |      
|Pine sawtimber                   |  |      | 576   |      | 580   |      | 581  
|Pine pulpwood                    |  |      | 459   |      | 416   |      | 298  
|Hardwood sawtimber               |  |      | 13    |      | 17    |      | 17   
|Hardwood pulpwood                |  |      | 80    |      | 107   |      | 91   
|                                 |  |      |      
|Sales price (per ton)            |  |      |       |      |       |      |      
|Pine sawtimber                   |  | $    | 40    |      | 45    |      | 45   
|Pine pulpwood                    |  |      | 13    |      | 8     |      | 9    
|Hardwood sawtimber               |  |      | 32    |      | 30    |      | 51   
|Hardwood pulpwood                |  |      | 9     |      | 5     |      | 7    
|                                 |  |      |      
|Timberland                       |  |      |       |      |       |      |      
|Net sales (millions of dollars)  |  | $    | 1.2   |      | .2    |      | .3   
|Sales volume (acres)             |  |      | 893   |      | 200   |      | 45   
|Sales price (per acre)           |  | $    | 1,700 |      | 1,400 |      | 5,300



28



---

##### Table of Contents

Total net sales in 2007 increased $2 million, or five percent, when compared to 2006. Sales of pine
pulpwood increased $2.6 million due to increases in both the per-ton average sales price and the volume harvested. During 2007, sales of timberland increased $1 million from 2006, due to an increase in the number of acres sold and the average
per-acre sales price. Other items contributing to the increase in total net sales were a $.5 million increase in hunting and oil and gas lease income, $.2 million increase in hardwood pulpwood sales, $.2 million in easements and rights-of-way
income, and $.4 million in other income related to wellsite damages, seismic permits and water usage. Sales of pine sawtimber decreased $2.9 million due to a lower per-ton average sales price. Also, freight revenue decreased $.5 million.

Total net sales in 2006 increased $2.5 million, or seven percent, when compared to 2005. Sales of pine pulpwood increased $.7 million due to an
increase in harvest level which was partially offset by a slightly lower per-ton average sales price. Other items contributing to the increase in total net sales were a $.8 million increase in hunting and oil and gas lease income, a $1.2 million
increase in freight revenue, and a $.2 million increase in other income related to seismic permits and wellsite damages. Sales of hardwood sawtimber decreased by $.4 million due to a lower per-ton average sales price.

The Woodlands segments operating income for 2007 was $2.2 million more than 2006 due to the increase in net sales and a reduction in silviculture
and freight expense, partially offset by an increase in the cost of timberland sales due to the increase in acres sold. The Woodlands segments operating income for 2006 was $.1 million more than 2005 due to the increase in net sales and a
reduction in cost for salaries and benefits and silviculture expense, partially offset by increases in freight expense and cost of fee timber harvested.



29



---

##### Table of Contents

Mills

Selected financial and statistical data for the Mills segment is shown in the following table.



|                                |  |      |      |      |      |      |      
|------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | -----
|                                |  | 2007 |      | 2006 |      | 2005
|Net sales (millions of dollars) |  |      |      |      |      |      |      
|Lumber                          |  | $    | 64.0 |      | 85.1 |      | 101.8
|Residual products               |  |      | 11.9 |      | 12.8 |      | 14.8 
|                                |  |      |     
|Lumber                          |  |      |      |      |      |      |      
|Finished production (MMBF)      |  |      | 213  |      | 253  |      | 265  
|Sales volume (MMBF)             |  |      | 218  |      | 263  |      | 276  
|Sales price (per MBF)           |  | $    | 293  |      | 324  |      | 369  

Total sales in 2007 decreased $22.6 million, or 22 percent, when compared to 2006. The decrease
was mainly due to a lower lumber sales volume, reduced residual sales volumes as a result of decreased lumber production and decreased freight revenue. This decrease was because the Waldo Mill was shut down approximately three months for repairs due
to a fire at the facility in the third quarter, combined with a lower average lumber sales price.

Total sales in 2006 decreased $19.3
million, or 16 percent, when compared to 2005. The decrease was due to a lower average lumber sales price combined with less volume sold, decreased revenues from sales of residual by-products due mainly to decreased lumber production, and a decrease
in freight revenue due to decreased lumber sales volume.

The increase in the Mills segments operating income for 2007 was mainly due
to the settlement of property and business interruption claims for the Waldo Mill. Included in the reported results were a $1.9 million gain on involuntary conversion of damaged assets and $1.2 million in other operating income from business
interruption insurance claims. This benefit, along with a reduction in the average production cost per MBF, was partially offset by the same factors that caused a decline in net sales. The decline in the Mills segments operating income for
2006 when compared to 2005 was due to the same factors that impacted sales.

Real Estate

Selected financial and statistical data for the Real Estate segment is shown in the following table.



|                                           |  |      |     |      |      |      |     
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | --- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----
|                                           |  | 2007 |     | 2006 |      | 2005
|Net sales (millions of dollars)            |  |      |     |      |      |      |     
|Residential lots                           |  | $    | 7.3 |      | 12.0 |      | 19.6
|Commercial sites                           |  |      | 6.3 |      | 13.6 |      | 5.4 
|Undeveloped acreage                        |  |      | 8.2 |      |     |      | .4  
|                                           |  |      |    
|Sales volume                               |  |      |     |      |      |      |     
|Residential lots                           |  |      | 81  |      | 116  |      | 249 
|Commercial acres                           |  |      | 26  |      | 55   |      | 6   
|Undeveloped acres                          |  |      | 680 |      |     |      | 7   
|                                           |  |      |    
|Average sales price (thousands of dollars) |  |      |     |      |      |      |     
|Residential lots                           |  | $    | 90  |      | 104  |      | 79  
|Commercial acres                           |  |      | 241 |      | 248  |      | 946 
|Undeveloped acres                          |  |      | 12  |      |     |      | 64  

Total net sales for 2007 decreased $5.2 million, or 15 percent, versus 2006 due primarily to
decreased revenues from the sale of residential lots and commercial acreage sales, partially offset by increased sales of undeveloped real estate acreage. The 2007 sales volume of commercial acreage decreased by 29 acres and the average sales price
per acre was slightly lower. The number of residential lots sold decreased by 35 lots and the average lot sales price decreased 14 percent to $89,500 per lot, due to sales mix of lots sold. There were approximately 680 acres of undeveloped real
estate sold at $12,000 per acre in 2007, while there were no such sales in 2006. Chenal Country Club, Inc. produced net sales of $7.5 million for 2007, an increase of $.8 million.



30



---

##### Table of Contents

Total net sales in 2006 increased $2.5 million, or eight percent, over 2005 due primarily to increased
commercial real estate sales, partially offset by decreased revenues from the sale of residential lots and undeveloped real estate acreage. The 2006 sales volume of commercial acreage increased significantly to 55 acres versus six acres during 2005,
but the average sales price per acre was lower in 2006 at $248,400 per acre versus $945,800 in 2005 due to the locations and intended use of the commercial sites sold. While the number of residential lots sold decreased by 133 lots, the average lot
sales price increased 32 percent to $103,800 per lot, due to the sales mix of the lots sold. There were no sales of undeveloped acreage in 2006, while seven acres were sold in 2005. Chenal Country Club, Inc. produced net sales of $6.7 million for
2006, an increase of $.3 million.

The changes in the Real Estate segments operating income were due primarily to the same factors
impacting net sales.

Corporate

The increase in operating expense for Corporate functions of $1.1 million in 2007 was due primarily to higher incentive plan expenses, partially offset by lower legal fees.

The increase in operating expense for Corporate functions of $.4 million in 2006 was due primarily to higher salaries and benefits and increased legal
fees, partially offset by lower employee relations cost and decreased charitable contributions.

Eliminations

Intersegment sales of timber from Deltics Woodlands segment to the Mills segment were $20.9 million in 2007, $21.9 million in 2006, and $20.8
million in 2005. The $1 million decrease during 2007 was due primarily to a lower average transfer price and the $1 million increase during 2006 was due primarily to a larger transfer volume.

Equity in Del-Tin Fiber

For the year
ended December 31, 2007, equity in Del-Tin Fiber recorded by the Company was $1.7 million compared to $2.9 million in 2006 and zero in 2005.

Additional selected financial and statistical data for Del-Tin Fiber is shown in the following table.



|                                |  |      |       |      |       |      |      
|------------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | ----- | ---- | -----
|                                |  | 2007 |       | 2006 |       | 2005
|Net sales (millions of dollars) |  | $    | 64.0  |      | 73.7  |      | 63.0 
|Finished production (MMSF)      |  |      | 116.7 |      | 147.0 |      | 140.9
|Board sales (MMSF)              |  |      | 118.5 |      | 144.9 |      | 139.8
|Sales price (per MSF)           |  | $    | 487   |      | 456   |      | 403  

Average sales price for 2007 increased $31 per MSF when compared to 2006 due to a change in
product mix to include a greater percentage of thin board, an increase in premium-grade production, and a price increase due to producers attempting to recover a portion of their higher resin glue cost. The decrease in finished production was
planned due to market conditions.

Average sales price for 2006 increased $53 per MSF when compared to 2005 due to favorable market
conditions for the first nine months of 2006, in conjunction with a change in product mix to include a greater percentage of thin board and an increase in premium grade production.



31



---

##### Table of Contents

Interest Income/Expense

When compared to the prior year, interest expense for 2007 decreased $.3 million due primarily to reduction in outstanding debt. The 2006 year decreased
$.4 million from 2005 due to a reduction in outstanding debt.

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was 40 percent, 37 percent, and 30 percent in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The increase in the effective income tax
rate for 2007 was due primarily to a higher effective rate for federal income taxes. The increase in the effective income tax rate for 2006 was due primarily to valuation allowance adjustments in 2005 combined with a higher effective rate for state
income taxes. Before recording the reduction in the valuation allowance, the Companys effective income tax rate for 2005 was 38 percent.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flows and Capital Expenditures

Net cash provided by operating activities totaled $28.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, which compares to $39.1 million for 2006 and
$43.1 million for 2005. Changes in operating working capital other than cash and cash equivalents, provided cash of $1.3 million in 2007, $4.5 million in 2006, and $1.2 million in 2005. Net cash provided/(required) by other operating activities
included changes in long-term deferred mineral lease bonus of $.5 million in 2007, $2.4 million in 2006, and $1.3 million in 2005. Also included in net cash provided by other operating activities in 2005 was $3.8 million received in connection with
the condemnation of a portion of a planned real estate development which was subsequently settled in 2007. The Companys accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows identify other differences between income and cash provided by operating
activities for each reported year.

Capital expenditures required cash of $20.6 million in 2007, $27.6 million in 2006, and $33.2 million
in 2005. Total capital expenditures, by segment, for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, 2005, are presented in the following table.



|                                          |  |      |      |      |      |   |      |     
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | - | ---- | ----
|(Millions of dollars)                     |  | 2007 |      | 2006 |      |   | 2005
|Woodlands                                 |  | $    | 5.0  |      | 3.3  |   |      | 7.0 
|Mills                                     |  |      | 5.3  |      | 8.8  |   |      | 10.7
|Real Estate                               |  |      | 10.2 |      | 15.6 |   |      | 15.4
|Corporate                                 |  |      | .1   |      | .1   |   |      | .1  
|                                          |  |      |      |      |      |   |      |     
|Total capital expenditures                |  |      | 20.6 |      | 27.8 |   |      | 33.2
|Non-cash land exchange                    |  |      |     |      | (.2  | ) |      |    
|                                          |  |      |      |      |      |   |      |     
|Total capital expenditures requiring cash |  | $    | 20.6 |      | 27.6 |   |      | 33.2
|                                          |  |      |      |      |      |   |      |     

Woodlands capital expenditures included timberland acquisitions of approximately 1,200 acres at a
cost of $2.2 million in 2007, 400 acres at a cost of $1.1 million in 2006, and approximately 1,800 acres at a cost of $5.4 million in 2005. Reforestation site preparation and planting required expenditures of $2 million in 2007, $1.5 million in
2006, and $1.3 million in 2005, and were the result of expansion of the Companys planting program due to final harvests of mature stands, necessitating regeneration, and to recent acquisitions of timberland.

During 2007, significant capital expenditures for the Mills segment included $2.6 million for a planer machine and related system enhancements at the
Waldo Mill, to replace the existing machine that was destroyed by fire. Also, at the Waldo Mill, $.3 million was expended on hard surfacing and $.1 million on a forklift. The Ola Mill expended $.4 million to complete the stick laying stacker
project, $.4 million on a gang saw control upgrade, $.2 million on a strapping system upgrade, and $.2 million on hard surfacing. During 2006, significant capital expenditures for the Mills segment included $1.7 million to make improvements to the



32



---

##### Table of Contents

primary breakdown and automatic log rotation system at the Ola Mill, which increased shift uptime and reduced recovery losses associated with cants
mis-manufactured due to poor rotation. The Ola Mill also installed a stick laying stacker at a cost of $.7 million which improved uptime, efficiencies, and productivity. Also at the Ola Mill, $.4 million was expended on sawmill modifications, $.3
million on a log loader, $.3 million on compressed air system improvements, and $.2 million on edger upgrades. The Waldo Mill expended $1.7 million on sawmill modifications to improve efficiencies and productivity, $.6 million was for an automatic
stick-laying system for the existing lumber stacker, and $.4 million was expended on a reman/re-entry system. During 2005, significant capital expenditures for the Mills segment included $6 million to add an additional boiler and upgrade the lumber
drying kilns at the Waldo Mill to improve sales realizations, while reducing costs, and to increase the mills lumber drying capacity. At the Ola Mill a primary breakdown redesign and rebuild of the sawmill processing equipment was performed at
a cost of $1.3 million which focused primarily on improving the handling system used to feed logs into the sawmill and overall flow of green lumber through the sawmill. Also, at the Ola Mill $.5 million was expended to complete the installation of a
semi-automated lumber grading system.

Capital expenditures for Real Estate operations related to the cost of residential lot development
totaled $.7 million in 2007, $2.4 million in 2006, and $9.5 million in 2005. Land acquisitions required $.8 million in 2007 and $.6 million in 2006, with no such expenditures in 2005. Infrastructure construction required $.1 million in 2007 and $.3
million in both 2006 and 2005. Expenditures related to golf operations at the two courses at Chenal Country Club totaled $.1 million in 2006 for course maintenance equipment and golf carts, compared to $.3 million in 2005, with no such expenditures
in 2007. The Company expended $1.8 million in 2007 and $6.1 million in 2006 on clubhouse renovations, the addition of a fitness center, and additional locker room and dining facilities. In addition, $1.7 million was expended in 2007, $1.4 million in
2006, and $1.7 million in 2005 for the construction of a limited number of speculative homes within the Companys Red Oak Ridge development located in Hot Springs, Arkansas. During 2007 and 2006, $1.3 million and $.2 million, respectively, was
expended to construct, furnish, and decorate one of three Southern Living Idea Homes in the United States to be used as a model home in the Red Oak Ridge development and to gain national exposure for the development. Other expenditures were
primarily for various amenity and infrastructure improvements.

Deltic had commitments of $5.2 million for capital projects in progress at
December 31, 2007. This total commitment includes $.6 million for reforestation site preparation and road construction, $1.4 million for land acquisitions, and $.2 million for the completion of various projects at both the Ola Mill and Waldo
Mill. Also, $3 million was committed to residential and commercial site development, new home construction, and amenity improvements at the Companys real estate developments.

The net change in purchase stumpage inventory required cash of $2.6 million in 2007, but provided cash of $.3 million in 2006 and $3.8 million in 2005.
Advances to Del-Tin Fiber by the Company amounted to $4.7 million, $2.8 million and $4.8 million, in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company received cash distributions from Del-Tin Fiber of $3.9 million in 2007, $4 million in 2006, and $3.8
million in 2005. Funds held by trustees to be used to acquire timberland designated as replacement property for income tax purposes, as required for tax-deferred exchanges, amounted to $.7 million in 2007 and $.1 million in 2006. There
were no funds held by trustees for tax-deferred exchanges in 2005. Initiation fees received from members joining Chenal Country Club, accounted for as a reduction in cost basis of the club rather than net sales, amounted to $1.1 million in 2007, $.9
million in 2006, and $1.1 million in 2005. In 2007 other net cash provided by investing activities included $1.9 million due to insurance proceeds for an involuntary conversion of assets related to a fire at the Waldo Mill.

During 2007, Deltic borrowed $19 million and repaid $19 million under its revolving credit facility. During 2006, Deltic borrowed $20 million and repaid
$24.5 million under its revolving credit facility. During 2005, Deltic borrowed $43.5 million and repaid $54.7 under its revolving credit facility.

The Company purchased 101,914 shares of treasury stock in 2007 for $4.9 million. During 2006, only seven treasury shares were purchased, and no shares were purchased in 2005. Cash required to pay common stock dividends totaled $3.7 million
in 2007 and 2006 and $3.4 million in 2005. Proceeds from stock option exercises amounted to $1 million, $2.5 million, and $1.9 million in 2007,



33



---

##### Table of Contents

2006, and 2005, respectively. Costs of $.6 million related to Deltics revolving credit facility were paid in 2007 and $.7 million were paid in 2005.
Tax benefits from stock option exercises were $.3 million in 2007 and $.6 million in 2006.

Financial Condition

Working capital at year-end totaled $7.3 million in 2007 and $12.7 million in 2006. Deltics working capital ratio at December 31, 2007, was
1.46 to 1 compared to 2.15 to 1 at the end of 2006. Cash and cash equivalents at the end of 2007 were $10.7 million compared to $11.4 million at the end of 2006. The total indebtedness of the Company at year-end 2007 and 2006 was $70 million.
Deltics long-term debt to stockholders equity ratio was .306 to 1 at December 31, 2007, compared to .337 to 1 at the end of 2006.

Liquidity

The primary sources of the Companys liquidity are internally generated funds, access to outside financing,
and working capital. The Companys current strategy for growth continues to emphasize its timberland acquisition program, in addition to expanding lumber production as market conditions allow and developing residential and/or commercial
properties at Chenal Valley and Red Oak Ridge.

To facilitate these growth plans, the Company has an agreement with a group of banks which
provides an unsecured and committed revolving credit facility totaling $300 million, inclusive of a $50 million letter of credit feature. The agreement will expire on September 9, 2012. As of December 31, 2007, all $300 million was
available, as no borrowings were outstanding under or supported by the facility. The credit agreement contains restrictive covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of debt and requirements to maintain certain financial ratios. (For
additional information about the Companys current financing arrangements, refer to Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements.)

In December 2000, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program of up to $10 million of Deltic common stock. In December 2007, the Companys Board of Directors expanded the program by $25 million. As of
December 31, 2007, the Company had expended $7.3 million under this program, with the purchase of 205,182 shares at an average cost of $35.60 per share; 101,914 shares were purchased under this program in 2007 and seven shares in 2006. In its
two previous repurchase programs, Deltic purchased 479,601 shares at an average cost of $20.89 and 419,542 shares at a $24.68 per share average cost, respectively.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements, Contractual Obligations, and Commitments

On August 26, 2004,
Del-Tin Fiber refinanced its existing long-term debt by entering into a credit agreement consisting of a letter of credit and term loan with multiple lending institutions. The funds provided from this credit agreement were used, together with the
existing balance in Del-Tin Fibers debt service reserve and bond sinking fund accounts, to redeem $60 million of its $89 million industrial revenue bonds. Under the new credit agreement, the lenders, on September 1, 2004, loaned Del-Tin
Fiber $30 million which will be repayable over five years in equal quarterly installments, that began December 31, 2004, and issued on Del-Tin Fibers behalf, a letter of credit in the amount of $29.7 million to support the remaining
industrial revenue bonds originally issued in 1998 by Union County, Arkansas. Concurrent with this event, on August 26, 2004, Deltic executed a guarantee agreement in connection with the refinancing of the debt of Del-Tin Fiber. Under
Deltics guarantee agreement, Deltic unconditionally guarantees the due and punctual payment of 50 percent ($20.5 million at December 31, 2007) of Del-Tin Fibers obligations under its credit agreement.

The Company has adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. In accordance with FIN 45, Deltic initially
estimated the fair value of its guarantee of Del-Tin Fibers credit agreement to be $3.5 million and included this non-cash amount in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheet as a long-term liability with an offsetting increase in the
Companys investment in Del-Tin Fiber. Deltic is reducing



34



---

##### Table of Contents

this liability systematically over the life of the credit agreement, as the Company is released from risk under the guarantee. At December 31, 2007,
Deltics remaining liability regarding the guarantee was $1.2 million.

The Company has both funded and unfunded noncontributory
defined benefit retirement plans that cover the majority of its employees. The plans provide defined benefits based on years of service and final average salary. Deltic also has other postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all of its
employees. The health care plan is contributory with participants contributions adjusted as needed; the life insurance plan is noncontributory. With regards to all of the Companys employee and retiree benefit plans, Deltic is unaware of
any trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties that will result in or that are reasonably likely to result in the Companys liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way, or which would cause the 2007 reported plan
information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating performance or future financial condition. (For information about material assumptions underlying the accounting for these plans and other components of the plans, refer to Note 15 to
the consolidated financial statements.)

Tabular summaries of the Companys contractual cash payment obligations and other commercial
commitment expirations, by period, are presented in the following tables.



|                                                      |  |       |       |            |      |             |      |             |      |           |     
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- | ----- | ---------- | ---- | ----------- | ---- | ----------- | ---- | --------- | ----
|(Millions of dollars)                                 |  | Total |       | During2008 |      | 2009 to2010 |      | 2011 to2012 |      | After2012
|Contractual cash payment obligations                  |  |       |       |            |      |             |      |             |      |           |     
|Real estate development committed capital cost        |  | $     | 6.2   |            | 2.1  |             | 4.1  |             |     |           |    
|Woodlands land acquisition and committed capital cost |  |       | 2.0   |            | 2.0  |             |     |             |     |           |    
|Mills committed capital cost                          |  |       | .2    |            | .2   |             |     |             |     |           |    
|Long-term debt                                        |  |       | 70.0  |            | 3.3  |             | 13.3 |             | 13.3 |           | 40.1
|Interest on debt1                                     |  |       | 27.5  |            | 4.5  |             | 7.5  |             | 5.9  |           | 9.6 
|Retirement plans                                      |  |       | 12.4  |            | .9   |             | 1.9  |             | 2.2  |           | 7.4 
|Other postretirement benefits                         |  |       | 5.8   |            | .5   |             | 1.0  |             | 1.1  |           | 3.2 
|Other long-term liabilities                           |  |       | 5.9   |            | .1   |             | 4.7  |             | 1.1  |           |    
|Unrecognized tax benefits                             |  |       | 1.2   |            | 1.2  |             |     |             |     |           |    
|                                                      |  |       |       |            |      |             |      |             |      |           |     
|                                                      |  | $     | 131.2 |            | 14.8 |             | 32.5 |             | 23.6 |           | 60.3
|                                                      |  |       |       |            |      |             |      |             |      |           |     
|Other commercial commitment expirations               |  |       |       |            |      |             |      |             |      |           |     
|Guarantee of indebtedness of Del-Tin Fiber            |  | $     | 20.5  |            | 17.5 |             | 3.0  |             |     |           |    
|Timber cutting agreements                             |  |       | .9    |            | .8   |             | .1   |             |     |           |    
|Operating leases                                      |  |       | .1    |            | .1   |             |     |             |     |           |    
|Letters of credit                                     |  |       | .3    |            |     |             | .3   |             |     |           |    
|                                                      |  |       |       |            |      |             |      |             |      |           |     
|                                                      |  | $     | 21.8  |            | 18.4 |             | 3.4  |             |     |           |    
|                                                      |  |       |       |            |      |             |      |             |      |           |     



|1 | Interest commitments are estimated using the Companys current interest rates for the respective debt agreements
over their remaining terms to expiration.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Outlook

Deltics management believes that cash provided from its operations, the remaining amount available under its credit facility, and its ability to
access the credit markets, will be sufficient to meet its expected cash needs and planned expenditures, including those of the Companys continued timberland acquisition and stock repurchase programs, and capital expenditures, for the
foreseeable future.



35



---

##### Table of Contents

The preceding discussion of the Companys liquidity and capital resources contains
forward-looking statements which were made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements reflect the Companys current expectations and involve risks and
uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those included in such forward-looking statements.

Other Matters

Impact of Inflation

General inflation
has not had a significant effect on the Companys operating results during the three years ended December 31, 2007. The Companys timber operations are more significantly impacted by the forces of supply and demand in the southern
United States than by changes in inflation. Lumber manufacturing operations are affected by the supply of lumber available in the North American market and by the demand for lumber by both the North American and foreign export markets. Sales of real
estate are affected by changes in the general economy and long-term interest rates, specifically as such may manifest themselves in the central Arkansas region.

Market Risk

Market risk represents the potential loss resulting from adverse changes in the value of
financial instruments, either derivative or non-derivative, caused by fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and equity security prices. The Company handles market risks in accordance with its established policies;
however, Deltic does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company does, on occasion, consider the need to enter into financial instruments to manage and reduce the impact of changes in
interest rates; however, the Company entered into no such instruments during the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. Deltic held various financial instruments at December 31, 2007 and 2006, consisting of financial assets and
liabilities reported in the Companys Consolidated Balance Sheets and off-balance sheet exposures resulting from contractual debt guarantees and letters of credit issued for the benefit of Deltic, primarily in connection with its purchased
stumpage procurement and real estate operations. (For additional information regarding these financial instruments, refer to the previous tabular summary of the Companys other commercial commitment expirations and to Note 13 to the
consolidated financial statements.)

Interest Rate Risk - The Company is subject to interest rate risk from the utilization of
financial instruments, such as term debt and other borrowings. The fair market value of long-term, fixed-interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk. Generally, the fair value of fixed-interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall
and will decrease as interest rates rise. Conversely, for floating rate debt, interest rate changes generally do not affect the instruments fair value, but do impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. The
estimated fair values of the Companys long-term debt, including current maturities, contractual guarantees of debt, and letters of credit at December 31, 2007, were $71 million, $1.2 million, and $.3 million, respectively.

A one percentage-point increase in prevailing interest rates would result in decreases in the estimated fair value of long-term debt of $6.3 million and
contractual guarantees of debt of $.1 million, while the fair value of the Companys letters of credit would be unchanged. Fair values were determined using the current rates at which the Company could enter into comparable financial
instruments with similar remaining maturities. There was no impact for 2007 resulting from a one percentage-point increase in interest rates on the estimated pretax earnings and cash flows, holding other variables constant.

Foreign-Exchange Rate Risk - The Company currently has no exposure to foreign-exchange rate risk because all of its financial instruments are
denominated in U.S. dollars.

Commodity Price Risk - The Company has no financial instruments subject to commodity price risk.



36



---

##### Table of Contents

Equity Security Price Risk - None of the Companys financial instruments have potential
exposure to equity security price risk.

The preceding discussion of the Companys estimated fair value of its financial instruments
and the sensitivity analyses resulting from hypothetical changes in interest rates are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements reflect the Companys
current expectations and involve uncertainties. These forward-looking market risk disclosures are selective in nature and only address the potential impact from financial instruments. They do not include other potential effects which could impact
Deltics business as a result of changes in interest rates, foreign-exchange rates, commodity prices, or equity security prices.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The Company has identified seven of its current accounting policies as being, in
managements view, critical to the portrayal of the Companys financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, six of these policies require significant assumptions and/or estimates on the part of management as it pertains to
certain factors inherent in the policies. The Companys senior management has discussed the development and selection of its critical accounting policies and estimates with the Companys Audit Committee. With the exception of the reduction
of the Companys deferred tax asset valuation allowance in 2005 (Refer to Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements), Deltic has not made any material changes to its critical accounting estimates in the last three years. These policies,
along with explanations of the key assumptions and/or estimates considered by management, are described below. (For a listing of all significant accounting policies of the Company, refer to Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.)



| | 1) | Investment in Real Estate Held for Development and Sale  Real estate held for development and sale is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, and includes
direct costs of land and land development and indirect costs, including amenities. Indirect and amenity costs are allocated to individual lots or acreage sold based on relative sales value. Direct costs are allocated on a specific neighborhood
basis, while indirect costs for the Companys four development areas  Chenal Valley, Chenal Downs, Red Oak Ridge, and the currently suspended The Ridges at Nowlin Creek  are allocated to neighborhoods over the entire respective
development area based on relative retail values.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The key factors involved in determining the Investment in Real Estate Held
for Development and Sale are: (1) the treatment of the clubhouse and golf course at Chenal Country Club, the amenity around which the Chenal Valley development is centered, as an amenity rather than an operating fixed asset and (2) the
management estimates required to estimate the future indirect development costs and sales values of the areas of Chenal Valley yet to be developed. Due to accounting for Chenal Country Club as an amenity, the cost of the clubhouse and golf course,
including the estimated cost of planned future improvements, are charged against income as real estate is sold rather than depreciating this cost. This amenity treatment also records the initiation fees received from members joining the club as a
reduction in the cost basis of the club rather than as net sales. In addition, the Companys model for allocating the indirect cost to be expensed against each piece of real estate sold requires management to estimate the future indirect costs
to be incurred for the entire development, primarily infrastructure costs and future improvements at Chenal Country Club (net of estimated future initiation fees to be received), as well as the potential market value of each tract of undeveloped
property within the Chenal Valley development. In determining future indirect development costs, management relies on cost projections for its development plans provided by independent professional engineering consultants. Independent appraisers are
utilized to provide the potential market value for unsold acreage.



| | 2) | Investment in Del-Tin Fiber Investment in Del-Tin Fiber L.L.C. (Del-Tin Fiber), a 50 percent-owned limited liability company, is carried at
cost and is adjusted for the Companys proportionate share of Del-Tin Fibers undistributed earnings or losses. The Companys equity-method-basis carrying value for its investment in Del-Tin Fiber is evaluated for possible impairment,
as applicable under the requirements of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) 18, The Equity
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



37



---

##### Table of Contents

| | Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. This evaluation as of December 31, 2002, based on the intent of the Companys Board of
Directors to exit the business, resulted in a determination that the Companys investment was impaired as of December 31, 2002, and the carrying amount of the investment was written off, to zero, for the 2002 Consolidated Balance Sheet. On
December 11, 2003, the Companys Board of Directors revised its intent in regard to selling Deltics interest in the joint venture. The resulting evaluation of fair value for the related investment indicated that fair value exceeded
carrying value, which was zero as of December 31, 2003, and the Company resumed recording its equity share of the operating results of Del-Tin Fiber. Likewise, cash advances to the joint venture are recorded as increases in the Companys
investment in the facility, while cash distributions received from the joint venture are reflected as reductions in its investment.
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Deltics investment in Del-Tin Fiber, the key determinations by management are (1) the accounting treatment for this investment under the equity method of accounting rather than as a consolidated
subsidiary since the joint venture is 50 percent owned by both owners, (2) the factors used in evaluating the impairment of the investments carrying value, and (3) the estimate of the fair value of the Companys guarantee of
Del-Tin Fibers credit agreement. Deltic management has determined that there is no control by either company due to having a Board of Managers with equal representation. As such, the assets and liabilities of Del-Tin Fiber are not included in
the amounts reported on the Companys balance sheet for any period. In evaluating the possibility of the existence of an impairment for the Companys carrying value for its investment in Del-Tin Fiber under APB 18, management must estimate
future net cash flows from the possible courses of action available for its investment, such as continuing to maintain or sell its investment, to determine both recoverability of the carrying amount and fair value of the investment. More
specifically, management must determine the possible courses of action and estimate the probability of each potential action, as well as the related future net cash flows. Then, if estimated fair value is less than the carrying amount, management
must determine if this impairment is other than temporary. If so, then an impairment write-down is required. In estimating the fair value of the guarantee of Del-Tin Fibers credit agreement, Deltics management must first assess how the
same debt instrument would have been structured without the guarantees of the joint venture partners, in order to estimate the benefit resulting from Deltics guarantee. A range of probabilities of estimated future cash outflows under the
benefit previously determined are then assembled. A probability-weighted present value of the estimated future cash outflows is then calculated. The resulting balance represents the fair value of the obligation, which is the estimate of the value of
assets required currently to settle the liability in the future. (For additional information about the Companys investment in Del-Tin Fiber, refer to Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements.)



| | 3) | Timber and Timberlands  Timber and timberlands, which includes purchased stumpage inventory and logging facilities, is stated at acquisition cost less cost of fee
timber harvested and accumulated depreciation of logging facilities. The cost of fee timber harvested is based on the volume of timber harvested in relation to the estimated volume of timber recoverable. Logging facilities, which consist primarily
of roads constructed and other land improvements, are depreciated using the straight-line method over a ten-year estimated life. The Companys professional foresters estimate its fee timber inventory using statistical information and data
obtained from physical measurements and other information gathering techniques. The cost of timber and timberland purchased and reforestation costs are capitalized. Fee timber carrying costs are expensed as incurred.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The key components of the Timber and Timberlands policy are: (1) managements decision to maintain separate timber cost pools for each legal
entity within the Deltic consolidated group and (2) the required estimation of timber inventory volume, by species, for each of these companies in order to calculate the cost of fee timber harvested per ton. Management has elected to maintain a
separate cost pool for the timber owned by each company, thus resulting in a different cost per ton for fee timber harvested for each. The mix of harvest by company for any period can significantly affect the amount of cost of



38



---

##### Table of Contents

fee timber harvested expense reported. Per-ton costs for 2007 ranged from $2.24 to $37.34 per ton for pine sawtimber. Had the Company opted to use a
composite depletion rate, cost of pine sawtimber harvested would have been the same in 2007, $.3 million more in 2006, and $.8 million more in 2005 (zero, $.2 million, and $.5 million, respectively, net of applicable income taxes) than as reported
due to the mix of harvest by company during the year. In determining these rates, management must estimate the volume of timber existing on its timberlands. To estimate these fee timber inventories, the Company relies on its experienced forestry
personnel and their use of statistical information and data obtained by actual physical measurements and other information gathering techniques. The recognized cost of fee timber harvested is impacted by the accuracy of this volume estimation. (For
additional information about the Companys timber and timberlands, refer to Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements.)



| | 4) | Property, Plant, and Equipment  Property, plant, and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of buildings, equipment, and other
depreciable assets is primarily determined using the straight-line method. Expenditures that substantially improve and/or increase the useful life of facilities or equipment are capitalized. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred.
Gains and losses on disposals or retirements are included in income as they occur.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Property, plant, and equipment assets are
evaluated for possible impairment on a specific asset basis or in groups of similar assets, as applicable, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to
be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted future net cash flows to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment
loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and depreciation ceases.

Management also evaluates any asset or group of assets for which potential impairment might exist and has determined that there are none
requiring an impairment write-down. This process requires managements estimate of future cash flows generated by each asset or group of assets. For any instance where this evaluation process might indicate an impairment exists, the appropriate
assets carrying values would be written down to fair value and the amount of the write-down would be charged against the results of continuing operations. (For additional information about the Companys property, plant, and equipment,
refer to Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements.)



| | 5) | Stock-Based Compensation  On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
Statement No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123 (R)). Prior to January 1, 2006, it accounted for share-based payments under the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and the related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS 123). Stock-based employee
compensation was accrued for the intrinsic value, if any, of stock options or restricted stock granted over the applicable vesting periods using the straight-line method. Options granted by the Company have an exercise price equal to the market
value of the underlying stock on the date of the grant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Company adopted SFAS 123 (R) using the modified-prospective
method. Under the transition method, compensation cost recognized in future interim and annual reporting periods includes: (1) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based
on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with



39



---

##### Table of Contents

the provisions of SFAS 123, and (2) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date
fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 (R). The results for prior periods have not been restated.

The
following table illustrates the effect on net income after tax and net income per common share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based compensation during year 2005.



|                                                                                                                                                                            |  |      |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | -
|(Thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)                                                                                                                            |  | 2005 |       
|Net income, as reported                                                                                                                                                     |  | $    | 14,518 |  
|Plus total stock-based compensation expense determined under the intrinsic value method for awards, net of related tax effects, included in
the determination of net income |  |      | 766    |  
|Less pro forma total stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of related tax
effects                                     |  |      | (955   | )
|                                                                                                                                                                            |  |      |        |  
|Pro forma net income                                                                                                                                                        |  | $    | 14,329 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                            |  |      |        |  
|Basic earnings per share                                                                                                                                                    |  |      |        |  
|As reported                                                                                                                                                                 |  | $    | 1.18   |  
|Pro forma                                                                                                                                                                   |  |      | 1.17   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                            | 
|Dilutive earnings per share                                                                                                                                                 |  |      |        |  
|As reported                                                                                                                                                                 |  | $    | 1.17   |  
|Pro forma                                                                                                                                                                   |  |      | 1.16   |  

For the pro forma net income calculation in the preceding table, the fair value of each option on
the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions for awards in 2005: dividend yield of .81 percent; expected volatility of 31.54 percent; risk-free interest rate of 3.83 percent; and expected
life of five years. Using these assumptions, the weighted average grant-date fair value per share of options granted in 2005 was $15.35.

The adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R) had an impact on the Companys results of operations. The consolidated statement of income for the year ended 2006, included $1,207,000 of stock-based compensation expense reflected in general
and administrative expenses.

SFAS No. 123 (R) requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost
to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under APB 25 and related interpretations. This requirement increased net financing cash flows, rather than net operating cash flows, for the year ended
December 31, 2006 by $611,000. The cumulative effect related to outstanding restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2005, which are not expected to vest based on an estimate of forfeitures, was not material.

Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (R), stock-based compensation cost is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value
of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the award. For valuation of stock options granted subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R), Deltic elected to use a binomial model to estimate fair value. The
fair value of restricted stock awards is determined by reference to the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. For restricted stock performance units subsequent to Deltics adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R),
the Monte Carlo simulation is being used to estimate fair value. For all awards subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R), the Company will recognize compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period.



40



---

##### Table of Contents

Deltic issues restricted stock performance units whose vesting is contingent upon meeting certain
financial performance goals based upon the Companys total stockholder return compared to the total return of a Paper and Forest Products Index (the Index) selected by the Compensation Committee and calculated by Standard and
Poors. Determining the appropriate amount to expense is based on likelihood of achievement of the stated goals and requires judgement, including forecasting future financial results. This estimate is revised periodically based on the
probability of achieving the required performance targets and adjustments are made as appropriate. The cumulative impact of any revision is reflected in the period of change.

The Company used historical volatility over the ten-year trading life of its stock to determine volatility assumptions. Risk-free interest rates are based
on historical rates and forward-looking factors. The expected dividend yield is based on the Companys average dividend yield from 2004 to 2006. The pre-vesting forfeiture rate is based on historical rates and forward-looking factors. The
expected option term is based on the term of the option and historical exercise, and expiration experience.

Assumptions for the 2007, 2006,
and 2005 valuation of stock options and restricted stock performance units consisted of the following:



|                                    |  |       |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|----------------------------------- |  | ----- | - |  | ----- | - |  | ----- | -
|                                    |  | 2007  |   |  | 2006  |   |  | 2005  |  
|Weighted expected volatility        |  | 28.72 | % |  | 28.97 | % |  | 31.54 | %
|Dividend yield                      |  | 0.64  | % |  | 0.76  | % |  | 0.81  | %
|Expected term of options (in years) |  | 6.27  |   |  | 6.27  |   |  | 5.00  |  
|Risk-free interest rate             |  | 4.76  | % |  | 4.43  | % |  | 3.83  | %



| | 6) | Revenue Recognition  The Company recognizes revenue when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, (2) delivery has occurred
or services have been rendered, (3) the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable, and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Delivery is not considered to have occurred until the customer takes title and assumes the risks and
rewards of ownership. Revenue from the sale of lumber and wood by-products is recorded at the time of shipment due to terms of such sale being designated free on board (f.o.b.) shipping point. Revenue from the sale of timber-cutting
rights to third parties is recorded when legal title passes to the purchaser, which is generally upon delivery of a legally executed timber deed and receipt of payment for the timber. Revenue from intersegment timber sales is recorded when the
timber is harvested. Such intersegment sales, which are made at prices which generally approximate market, are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements. Revenue from timberland and real estate sales is recorded under the criteria of the
Financial Accounting Standards Boards Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. Such revenue is recorded at the time the purchaser executes the real estate closing
documents and makes payment to the title company handling the closing.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 7) | Income Taxes  The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, the provision for income taxes includes amounts
currently payable and amounts deferred as tax assets and liabilities, based on differences between financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities, and is measured using the enacted tax rates that are
assumed will be in effect when the differences reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance which is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The key management decisions related to income taxes are: (1) the determination of current taxability of transactions, (2) the election to capitalize or expense costs incurred, (3) the decision
regarding the appropriate depreciation method for income tax purposes (these three factors ultimately affect the Companys cash flows for income taxes paid and determine



41



---

##### Table of Contents

the differences between the financial statements carrying amounts and tax bases of existing assets and liabilities), and (4) managements
estimation of the appropriateness of valuation allowances to reduce any deferred tax assets that exist. Deltics management periodically evaluates the Companys ability to realize future benefit of deferred tax assets by reviewing the
expected turnaround of deferred tax liabilities and the amount of future taxable income and by evaluating tax planning strategies that could possibly be implemented to realize deferred tax assets.

The Company maintains liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits for various uncertain tax positions taken in our tax return. These liabilities are
estimated based on our judgment of our probable outcome of the uncertain tax positions and are adjusted periodically based on changing facts and circumstances. Changes to the liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits could materially affect
operating results in the period of change.

Related-Party Transactions

The Company has committed to provide to Del-Tin Fiber a portion of the plants fiber and wood supply at market prices. This arrangement benefits
Del-Tin Fiber by ensuring a portion of its raw material needs while providing the Company with a purchaser of residual by-products produced by its lumber mills, if needed. The market price that Deltic receives for these transactions is determined by
the average price paid during the immediate preceding year by Del-Tin Fiber to other suppliers of the products purchased from the Company. During 2007, 2006, and 2005, Deltic sold Del-Tin Fiber approximately $3.7 million, $3.9 million, and $3.9
million each year, respectively, of these residual by-products.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements

(For information regarding the impact of recent accounting pronouncements, refer to the related section in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements.)

Environmental Matters

Deltic is committed to protecting the environment and has certain standards with which it must comply based on federal, state, and local laws for the protection of the environment. Costs of compliance through 2007
have not been material, and the Companys management currently has no reason to believe that such costs will become material for the foreseeable future.

Contingencies

The Company is involved in litigation incidental to its business from time to time.
Currently, there are no material legal proceedings outstanding.

Outlook

Pine sawtimber harvested from Deltics fee lands in 2008 is projected to be 550,000 to 575,000 tons. Finished lumber production and resulting sales
volumes are projected at 270 to 300 million feet for 2008; however, these volumes are dependent upon market conditions. Deltic anticipates that closings for residential lots will be 60 to 80 lots for the year of 2008, barring further declines
in economic growth or residential construction activity. The Company will continue to recognize equity in the financial results of Del-Tin Fiber.

The Companys capital expenditures budget for the year of 2008 was prepared in the fall of 2007 and provides for expenditures totaling $40.9 million. The Woodlands capital budget of $20.7 million includes $15.7 million for timberland
acquisitions, which will be dependent on the availability of acreage at prices that meet the Companys criteria for timber stocking, growth potential, site index, and location, and $4.2 million for reforestation site preparation and planting.
During 2008, various sawmill projects are expected to require $7 million. The capital budget for Real Estate operations of $12.9 million includes expenditures for residential real estate lot



42



---

##### Table of Contents

development totaling $2.5 million, depending on demand for residential lots and other marketing conditions, and $1.2 million for land acquisitions. In
addition, $2.1 million is budgeted in 2008 for the construction of additional speculative homes within the Companys Red Oak Ridge development located in Hot Springs, Arkansas. The remainder of budgeted Real Estate segment expenditures are
primarily for various infrastructure and other amenity improvements. Capital and other expenditures are under constant review, and these budgeted amounts may be adjusted to reflect changes in the Companys estimated cash flows from operations,
borrowings or repayments under credit facilities, or general economic conditions.

Certain statements contained in this report that are not
historical in nature constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Words such as expects, anticipates, intends, plans,
estimates, or variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements reflect the Companys current expectations and involve certain risks and uncertainties,
including those disclosed elsewhere in this report. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from those included in such forward-looking statements.



43



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------

Information with respect to quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk of the Company is set forth under the caption Other Matters - Market Risk in Item 7 of Part II of this report.



44



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|------- | -------------------------------------------

DELTIC
TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

December 31, 2007 and 2006

(Thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                                                                                 |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |        
|Assets                                                                           |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Current assets                                                                   |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                        |  | $    | 10,673  |   |      | 11,359  |  
|Trade accounts receivable  net                                                  |  |      | 3,941   |   |      | 4,147   |  
|Other receivables                                                                |  |      | 161     |   |      | 772     |  
|Inventories                                                                      |  |      | 6,156   |   |      | 5,124   |  
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                        |  |      | 2,302   |   |      | 2,397   |  
|                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total current assets                                                             |  |      | 23,233  |   |      | 23,799  |  
|Investment in real estate held for development and sale                          |  |      | 46,048  |   |      | 44,255  |  
|Investment in Del-Tin Fiber                                                      |  |      | 7,017   |   |      | 5,250   |  
|Other investments and noncurrent receivables                                     |  |      | 2,445   |   |      | 1,767   |  
|Timber and timberlands  net                                                     |  |      | 208,428 |   |      | 207,637 |  
|Property, plant, and equipment  net                                             |  |      | 39,214  |   |      | 40,925  |  
|Deferred charges and other assets                                                |  |      | 2,359   |   |      | 633     |  
|                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total assets                                                                     |  | $    | 328,744 |   |      | 324,266 |  
|                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Liabilities and Stockholders Equity                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Current liabilities                                                              |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Current maturities of long-term debt                                             |  | $    | 3,333   |   |      |        |  
|Trade accounts payable                                                           |  |      | 2,660   |   |      | 3,882   |  
|Accrued taxes other than income taxes                                            |  |      | 1,650   |   |      | 1,693   |  
|Income taxes payable                                                             |  |      | 1,371   |   |      |        |  
|Deferred revenues and other accrued liabilities                                  |  |      | 6,934   |   |      | 5,514   |  
|                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total current liabilities                                                        |  |      | 15,948  |   |      | 11,089  |  
|                                                                                 |  |     
|Long-term debt                                                                   |  |      | 66,667  |   |      | 70,000  |  
|Deferred tax liabilities  net                                                   |  |      | 6,800   |   |      | 4,178   |  
|Guarantee of indebtedness of Del-Tin Fiber                                       |  |      | 1,207   |   |      | 1,898   |  
|Other noncurrent liabilities                                                     |  |      | 20,036  |   |      | 29,620  |  
|Stockholders equity                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Cumulative preferred stock - $.01 par, authorized 20,000,000 shares, none issued |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Common stock - $.01 par, authorized 50,000,000 shares, 12,813,879 shares issued  |  |      | 128     |   |      | 128     |  
|Capital in excess of par value                                                   |  |      | 76,637  |   |      | 73,999  |  
|Retained earnings                                                                |  |      | 155,299 |   |      | 147,406 |  
|Treasury stock                                                                   |  |      | (12,385 | ) |      | (8,932  | )
|Accumulated other comprehensive income                                           |  |      | (1,593  | ) |      | (5,120  | )
|                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total stockholders equity                                                       |  |      | 218,086 |   |      | 207,481 |  
|                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total liabilities and stockholders equity                                       |  | $    | 328,744 |   |      | 324,266 |  
|                                                                                 |  |      |         |   |      |         |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



45



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005

(Thousands of
dollars, except per share amounts)



|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                                                             |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |         |   | 2005 |        
|Net sales                                                    |  | $    | 128,255 |   |      | 153,112 |   |      | 168,350 |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Costs and expenses                                           |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Cost of sales                                                |  |      | 81,658  |   |      | 106,443 |   |      | 116,900 |  
|Depreciation, amortization, and cost of fee timber harvested |  |      | 14,332  |   |      | 13,774  |   |      | 11,479  |  
|General and administrative expenses                          |  |      | 15,379  |   |      | 14,174  |   |      | 13,714  |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total costs and expenses                                     |  |      | 111,369 |   |      | 134,391 |   |      | 142,093 |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Gain on involuntary conversion                               |  |      | 1,887   |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Other income  business interruption insurance proceeds      |  |      | 1,186   |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Operating income                                             |  |      | 19,959  |   |      | 18,721  |   |      | 26,257  |  
|Equity in Del-Tin Fiber                                      |  |      | 1,679   |   |      | 2,872   |   |      | (13     | )
|Interest income                                              |  |      | 823     |   |      | 452     |   |      | 198     |  
|Interest and other debt expense                              |  |      | (5,138  | ) |      | (5,415  | ) |      | (5,758  | )
|Interest capitalized                                         |  |      | 769     |   |      | 1,184   |   |      |        |  
|Other income                                                 |  |      | 345     |   |      | 290     |   |      | 32      |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income before income taxes                                   |  |      | 18,437  |   |      | 18,104  |   |      | 20,716  |  
|Income taxes                                                 |  |      | (7,326  | ) |      | (6,781  | ) |      | (6,198  | )
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income                                                   |  | $    | 11,111  |   |      | 11,323  |   |      | 14,518  |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Earnings per common share                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Basic                                                        |  | $    | .89     |   |      | .91     |   |      | 1.18    |  
|Assuming dilution                                            |  | $    | .89     |   |      | .89     |   |      | 1.17    |  
|Dividends declared per common share                          |  | $    | .300    |   |      | .300    |   |      | .275    |  
|Average common shares outstanding (thousands)                |  |      | 12,473  |   |      | 12,398  |   |      | 12,260  |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



46



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005

(Thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                                                                                    |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |         |   | 2005 |        
|Operating activities                                                                |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net income                                                                          |  | $    | 11,111  |   |      | 11,323  |   |      | 14,518  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Depreciation, amortization, and cost of fee timber harvested                        |  |      | 14,332  |   |      | 13,774  |   |      | 11,479  |  
|Stock-based compensation expense                                                    |  |      | 2,676   |   |      | 1,207   |   |      |        |  
|Deferred income taxes                                                               |  |      | 1,082   |   |      | (4,286  | ) |      | (4,242  | )
|Real estate costs recovered upon sale                                               |  |      | 5,946   |   |      | 11,290  |   |      | 12,539  |  
|Timberland costs recovered upon sale                                                |  |      | 327     |   |      | 77      |   |      | 17      |  
|Equity in Del-Tin Fiber                                                             |  |      | (1,679  | ) |      | (2,872  | ) |      | 13      |  
|Net increase/(decrease) in provisions for pension and other postretirement benefits |  |      | (183    | ) |      | 810     |   |      | 969     |  
|Decrease in operating working capital other than cash and cash equivalents          |  |      | 1,341   |   |      | 4,452   |   |      | 1,247   |  
|Gain on involuntary conversion                                                      |  |      | (1,887  | ) |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Other - net                                                                         |  |      | (4,823  | ) |      | 3,373   |   |      | 6,585   |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                           |  |      | 28,243  |   |      | 39,148  |   |      | 43,125  |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Investing activities                                                                |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Capital expenditures requiring cash                                                 |  |      | (20,568 | ) |      | (27,620 | ) |      | (33,247 | )
|Net change in purchased stumpage inventory                                          |  |      | (2,603  | ) |      | 266     |   |      | 3,828   |  
|Advances to Del-Tin Fiber                                                           |  |      | (4,654  | ) |      | (2,832  | ) |      | (4,831  | )
|Distributions from Del-Tin Fiber                                                    |  |      | 3,876   |   |      | 3,950   |   |      | 3,800   |  
|Increase in funds held by trustee                                                   |  |      | (694    | ) |      | (111    | ) |      |        |  
|Insurance proceeds from involuntary conversion                                      |  |      | 1,991   |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Other  net                                                                         |  |      | 1,629   |   |      | 2,113   |   |      | 1,435   |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net cash required by investing activities                                           |  |      | (21,023 | ) |      | (24,234 | ) |      | (29,015 | )
|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Financing activities                                                                |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Proceeds from borrowings                                                            |  |      | 19,000  |   |      | 20,000  |   |      | 43,500  |  
|Repayments of notes payable and long-term debt                                      |  |      | (19,000 | ) |      | (24,524 | ) |      | (54,732 | )
|Treasury stock purchases                                                            |  |      | (4,901  | ) |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Common stock dividends paid                                                         |  |      | (3,742  | ) |      | (3,721  | ) |      | (3,373  | )
|Proceeds from stock option exercises                                                |  |      | 997     |   |      | 2,450   |   |      | 1,886   |  
|Tax effect of stock options exercised                                               |  |      | 306     |   |      | 611     |   |      |        |  
|Other - net                                                                         |  |      | (566    | ) |      | (8      | ) |      | (613    | )
|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net cash required by financing activities                                           |  |      | (7,906  | ) |      | (5,192  | ) |      | (13,332 | )
|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents                                |  |      | (686    | ) |      | 9,722   |   |      | 778     |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year                                      |  |      | 11,359  |   |      | 1,637   |   |      | 859     |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Cash and cash equivalents at end of year                                            |  | $    | 10,673  |   |      | 11,359  |   |      | 1,637   |  
|                                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



47



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005

(Thousands of dollars)



|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                                                                                                          |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |         |   | 2005 |        
|Cumulative preferred stock  $.01 par, authorized 20,000,000 shares; no shares issued at end of each year |  | $    |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Common stock  $.01 par, authorized 50,000,000 shares, 12,813,879 shares issued at end of each year       |  |      | 128     |   |      | 128     |   |      | 128     |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Capital in excess of par value                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at beginning of year                                                                              |  |      | 73,999  |   |      | 73,431  |   |      | 71,483  |  
|Exercise of stock options                                                                                 |  |      | 142     |   |      | 434     |   |      | 310     |  
|Tax benefits on stock options                                                                             |  |      | 413     |   |      | 879     |   |      | 700     |  
|Amortization to expense                                                                                   |  |      | 2,676   |   |      | 1,207   |   |      |        |  
|Transition to SFAS No. 123(R)                                                                             |  |      |        |   |      | (1,581  | ) |      |        |  
|Restricted stock awards                                                                                   |  |      | (681    | ) |      | (528    | ) |      | 938     |  
|Restricted stock forfeitures                                                                              |  |      | 88      |   |      | 157     |   |      |        |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at end of year                                                                                    |  |      | 76,637  |   |      | 73,999  |   |      | 73,431  |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Retained earnings                                                                                         |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at beginning of year                                                                              |  |      | 147,406 |   |      | 138,333 |   |      | 127,188 |  
|Net income                                                                                                |  |      | 11,111  |   |      | 11,323  |   |      | 14,518  |  
|Common stock dividends declared, $.300 per share in 2007 and 2006, $.275 per share in 2005                |  |      | (3,742  | ) |      | (3,721  | ) |      | (3,373  | )
|SAB 108 cumulative adjustment                                                                             |  |      |        |   |      | 1,471   |   |      |        |  
|FIN 48 adjustment                                                                                         |  |      | 524     |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at end of year                                                                                    |  |      | 155,299 |   |      | 147,406 |   |      | 138,333 |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Unamortized restricted stock awards                                                                       |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at beginning of year                                                                              |  |      |        |   |      | (1,879  | ) |      | (924    | )
|Transition to SFAS No. 123(R)                                                                             |  |      |        |   |      | 1,879   |   |      |        |  
|Stock awards                                                                                              |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      | (1,683  | )
|Shares forfeited                                                                                          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      | 21      |  
|Amortization to expense                                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      | 707     |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at end of year                                                                                    |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      | (1,879  | )
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Treasury stock                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at beginning of year  388,682, 499,372, and 605,401 shares, respectively                         |  |      | (8,932  | ) |      | (11,367 | ) |      | (13,772 | )
|Shares purchased  101,914, 7, and zero shares, respectively                                              |  |      | (4,901  | ) |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Forfeited restricted stock  1,775, 2,934, and 550 shares, respectively                                   |  |      | (88     | ) |      | (157    | ) |      | (21     | )
|Shares issued for incentive plans  66,709, 113,631, and 106,579 shares, respectively                     |  |      | 1,536   |   |      | 2,592   |   |      | 2,426   |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at end of year  425,662, 388,682, and 499,372, shares, respectively, at cost                     |  |      | (12,385 | ) |      | (8,932  | ) |      | (11,367 | )
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive income                                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at beginning of year                                                                              |  |      | (5,120  | ) |      | (402    | ) |      | (12     | )
|Net change in other comprehensive income, net of tax $2,341                                               |  |      | 3,527   |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Minimum pension liability adjustment, net of income taxes                                                 |  |      |        |   |      | 298     |   |      | (390    | )
|Transition to SFAS No. 158, net of income taxes                                                           |  |      |        |   |      | (5,016  | ) |      |        |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Balance at end of year                                                                                    |  |      | (1,593  | ) |      | (5,120  | ) |      | (402    | )
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total stockholders equity                                                                                |  | $    | 218,086 |   |      | 207,481 |   |      | 198,244 |  
|                                                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



48



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005

(Thousands of dollars)



|                                                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | -
|                                                                       |  | 2007 |        |   | 2006 |        |   | 2005 |       
|Net income                                                             |  | $    | 11,111 |   |      | 11,323 |   |      | 14,518 |  
|                                                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Other comprehensive income/(loss)                                      |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Minimum pension liability adjustment                                   |  |      |       |   |      | 491    |   |      | (600   | )
|Items related to employee benefit plans:                               |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Actuarial gain arising during period                                   |  |      | 2,939  |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Gain on plan assets                                                    |  |      | 1,279  |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Prior service credit arising during period                             |  |      | 1,853  |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income: |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Amortization of prior service cost                                     |  |      | (51    | ) |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Amortization of actuarial loss                                         |  |      | (351   | ) |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Amortization of plan amendment                                         |  |      | 199    |   |      |       |   |      |       |  
|Income taxes expense related to items of other comprehensive income    |  |      | (2,341 | ) |      | (193   | ) |      | 210    |  
|                                                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Net change in other comprehensive income/(loss)                        |  |      | 3,527  |   |      | 298    |   |      | (390   | )
|                                                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Comprehensive income                                                   |  | $    | 14,638 |   |      | 11,621 |   |      | 14,128 |  
|                                                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.



49



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 1 - Significant Accounting
Policies



Description of Business  Deltic Timber Corporation (Deltic
or the Company) is a natural resources company engaged primarily in the growing and harvesting of timber and the manufacture and marketing of lumber. Deltic owns approximately 439,000 acres of timberland, primarily in Arkansas and north
Louisiana. The Companys sawmill operations are located at Ola in central Arkansas and at Waldo in south Arkansas. In addition to its timber and lumber operations, the Company is engaged in real estate development in central Arkansas. The
Company also holds a 50 percent interest in Del-Tin Fiber, L.L.C., a joint venture to manufacture and market medium density fiberboard.

Business environment The Company is primarily a wood products producer operating in a commodity-based business environment with a major diversification in real estate development. This environment is
affected by a number of factors including general economic conditions, interest rates, imports, foreign exchange rates, housing starts, residential repair and remodeling, commercial construction, industry capacity and production levels, the
availability of raw materials and weather conditions.

Principles of Consolidation  The consolidated financial
statements of Deltic Timber Corporation include the accounts of Deltic and all majority-owned subsidiaries after elimination of significant intercompany transactions and accounts.

Use of Estimates  In the preparation of the Companys financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, management has made a number of estimates and assumptions related to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from
those estimates.

Cash Equivalents  Cash equivalents include investments that have a maturity of three months
or less from the date of purchase.

Accounts Receivable  The Company records trade accounts receivable at net
realizable value. This value includes an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts to reflect any loss anticipated on the trade accounts receivable balances and charged to the provision for doubtful accounts. Our allowance is based
upon review of specific receivables outstanding and considers factors such as current overall economic conditions, industry-specific economic conditions, historical customer performance and anticipated customer performance. At December 31, 2007
and 2006, the balance in the allowance account was $52,000 and $55,000, respectively.

Inventories 
Inventories of logs, lumber, and supplies are stated at the lower of cost or market, primarily using the average cost method. Log costs include harvest and transportation cost as appropriate. Lumber costs include materials, labor, and production
overhead. (For additional information, see Note 2  Inventories.)

Investment in Real Estate Held for Development
and Sale  Real estate held for development and sale is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, and includes direct costs of land and land development and indirect costs, including amenities. Indirect and amenity costs are
allocated to individual lots or acreage sold based on relative sales value. Direct costs are allocated on a specific neighborhood basis, while indirect costs for the Companys four development areas  Chenal Valley, Chenal Downs, Red Oak
Ridge, and the currently suspended The Ridges at Nowlin Creek  are allocated to neighborhoods over the entire respective development area based on relative retail values.

Investment in Del-Tin Fiber Investment in Del-Tin Fiber L.L.C. (Del-Tin Fiber), a 50 percent-owned limited
liability company, is accounted for using the equity method and evaluated for possible impairment, as applicable under the requirements



50



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 1  Significant Accounting
Policies (cont.)



of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock. At
December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Companys share of the underlying net assets of Del-Tin Fiber exceeded its investment by $15,820,000 and $16,883,000, respectively. The difference relates primarily to the Companys write-off of its
carrying amount for its investment in Del-Tin Fiber as of December 31, 2002, which was not recorded by Del-Tin. The equity in earnings of Del-Tin recognized by the Company exceeds its ownership percentage of Del-Tins earnings because the
difference in basis between the Company and Del-Tin is being adjusted to account for Del-Tins operating results as if it were a consolidated subsidiary. Cash advances to the joint venture are recorded as increases in the Companys
investment carrying value, while cash distributions received from the joint venture result in reductions in investment carrying value. (For additional information, see Note 4  Investment in Del-Tin Fiber.)

Timber and Timberlands  Timber and timberlands, which includes purchased stumpage inventory and logging facilities, is
stated at acquisition cost less cost of fee timber harvested and accumulated depreciation of logging facilities and includes no estimated future reforestation cost. The cost of fee timber harvested is based on the volume of timber harvested in
relation to the estimated volume of timber recoverable. Logging facilities, which consist primarily of roads constructed and other land improvements, are depreciated using the straight-line method over a ten-year estimated life. The Company
estimates its fee timber inventory using statistical information and data obtained from physical measurements and other information gathering techniques. The cost of timber and timberland purchased and reforestation costs are capitalized. Fee timber
carrying costs are expensed as incurred.

Property, Plant, and Equipment  Property, plant, and equipment
assets are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation of buildings, equipment, and other depreciable assets is primarily determined using the straight-line method. Expenditures that substantially improve and/or increase the useful
life of facilities or equipment are capitalized. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. Gains and losses on disposals or retirements are recognized in the period they occur.

Property, plant, and equipment assets are evaluated for possible impairment on a specific asset basis or in groups of similar assets, as applicable,
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to estimated undiscounted
future net cash flows to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the
asset. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell, and depreciation ceases.

Revenue Recognition  The Company recognizes revenue when the following criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3)
the price to the buyer is fixed and determinable, and (4) collectibility is reasonably assured. Delivery is not considered to have occurred until the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership. Revenue from the sale of
lumber and wood by-products is recorded at the time of shipment due to terms of such sale being designated free on board (f.o.b.) shipping point. Revenue from the sale of timber-cutting rights to third parties is recorded when legal
title passes to the purchaser, which is generally upon delivery of a legally executed timber deed and receipt of payment for the timber. Revenue from intersegment timber sales is recorded when the timber is harvested; such intersegment sales, which
are made at prices which generally approximate market, are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements.



51



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 1  Significant Accounting
Policies (cont.)



Revenue from the leasing of land for hunting purposes is deferred when received and subsequently recognized over the one-year lease term which begins
September 1. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had deferred hunting lease revenue totaling $1,165,000 and $1,116,000, respectively, reflected in the consolidated balance sheets in deferred revenues and other accrued liabilities.
Revenue from bonus payments under mineral leases is deferred and recognized over the lease term, while related royalty payments are recognized when received. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had deferred mineral lease revenue of
$5,891,000 and $4,948,000, respectively of which $4,116,000 and $3,621,000 is included in other noncurrent liabilities and $1,775,000 and $1,327,000 is included in other current liabilities. Revenue from timberland and real estate is recorded under
the criteria of the Financial Accounting Standards Boards Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. Such revenue is recorded when the sale is closed and legal
title is transferred, which is generally at the time the purchaser executes the real estate closing documents and makes payment to the title company handling the closing.

Income Taxes  The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, the
provision for income taxes includes amounts currently payable and amounts deferred as tax assets and liabilities, based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities, and is
measured using the enacted tax rates that are expected to be in effect when the differences reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance which is established when it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the
deferred tax assets will not be realized. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

Property Taxes  Property taxes applicable to the Companys assets are estimated and accrued in the period of
assessment. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Company had accrued property tax expense totaling $1,470,000 and $1,507,000, respectively, reflected in the consolidated balance sheet in accrued taxes other than income taxes.

Stock-Based Compensation  On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123 (R)). Prior to January 1, 2006, Deltic accounted for share-based payments under the recognition and measurement
provisions of APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees (APB 25), and the related Interpretations, as permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
(SFAS 123). Stock-based employee compensation was accrued for the intrinsic value, if any, of stock options or restricted stock granted over the applicable vesting periods using the straight-line method. Options granted by the Company
have an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying stock on the date of the grant.

The Company adopted SFAS 123
(R) using the modified-prospective method. Under the transition method, compensation cost recognized in future interim and annual reporting periods includes: (1) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet
vested as of January 1, 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123, and (2) compensation cost for all share-based payment granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the
grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123 (R). The results for prior periods have not been restated.



52



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 1  Significant Accounting
Policies (cont.)



The following table illustrates the effect on net income after tax and net income per common share as
if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to stock-based compensation during 2005.



|                                                                                                                                                                            |  |      |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | -
|(Thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)                                                                                                                            |  | 2005 |       
|Net income, as reported                                                                                                                                                     |  | $    | 14,518 |  
|Plus total stock-based compensation expense determined under the intrinsic value method for awards, net of related tax effects, included in
the determination of net income |  |      | 766    |  
|Less pro forma total stock-based compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of related tax
effects                                     |  |      | (955   | )
|                                                                                                                                                                            |  |      |        |  
|Pro forma net income                                                                                                                                                        |  | $    | 14,329 |  
|                                                                                                                                                                            |  |      |        |  
|Basic earnings per share                                                                                                                                                    |  |      |        |  
|As reported                                                                                                                                                                 |  | $    | 1.18   |  
|Pro forma                                                                                                                                                                   |  |      | 1.17   |  
|                                                                                                                                                                            | 
|Dilutive earnings per share                                                                                                                                                 |  |      |        |  
|As reported                                                                                                                                                                 |  | $    | 1.17   |  
|Pro forma                                                                                                                                                                   |  |      | 1.16   |  

For the pro forma net income calculation in the preceding table, the fair value of each option on
the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following assumptions for awards in 2005: dividend yield of .81 percent; expected volatility of 31.54 percent; risk-free interest rate of 3.83 percent; and expected
lives of five years. Using these assumptions, the weighted average grant-date fair value per share of options granted in 2005 was $15.35.

The adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R) had an impact on the Companys results of operations. The consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 included $2,676,000 and $1,207,000,
respectively, of stock-based compensation expense reflected in general and administrative expenses.

SFAS No. 123 (R) requires the
benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under APB 25 and related interpretations. This requirement increased net financing cash
flows, rather than net operating cash flows, for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 by $306,000 and $611,000, respectively. The cumulative effect related to outstanding restricted stock awards as of December 31, 2005, which are not
expected to vest based on an estimate of forfeitures, was not material.



53



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 1  Significant Accounting
Policies (cont.)



Under the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (R), stock-based compensation cost
is estimated at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the award. For valuation of stock options granted subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R), Deltic
elected to use a binomial model to estimate fair value. The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined by reference to the fair market value of the Companys common stock on the date of grant. For restricted stock performance units
subsequent to Deltics adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R), the Monte Carlo simulation is being used to estimate fair value. For all awards subsequent to the adoption of SFAS No. 123 (R), the Company recognizes compensation cost on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period.

Deltic issues restricted stock performance units whose vesting is contingent upon
meeting certain financial performance goals based upon the Companys total stockholder return compared to the total return of a Paper and Forest Products Index selected by the Compensation Committee and calculated by Standard and Poors.
Determining the appropriate amount to expense is based on likelihood of achievement of the stated goals and requires judgement, including forecasting future financial results. This estimate is revised periodically based on the probability of
achieving the required performance targets and adjustments are made as appropriate. The cumulative impact of any revision is reflected in the period of change.

The Company uses historical volatility over a ten-year trading life to determine volatility assumptions. Risk-free interest rates are based on historical rates and forward-looking factors. The expected dividend yield
is based on the Companys average dividend yield from 2004 to 2006. The pre-vesting forfeiture rate is based on historical rates and forward-looking factors. The expected option term is based on the term of the option and historical exercise
and expiration experience.

Assumptions for the 2007, 2006, and 2005 valuation of stock options and restricted stock performance units
consisted of the following:



|                                    |  |       |   |  |       |   |  |       |  
|----------------------------------- |  | ----- | - |  | ----- | - |  | ----- | -
|                                    |  | 2007  |   |  | 2006  |   |  | 2005  |  
|Weighted expected volatility        |  | 28.72 | % |  | 28.97 | % |  | 31.54 | %
|Dividend yield                      |  | 0.64  | % |  | 0.76  | % |  | 0.81  | %
|Expected term of options (in years) |  | 6.27  |   |  | 6.27  |   |  | 5.00  |  
|Risk-free interest rate             |  | 4.76  | % |  | 4.43  | % |  | 3.83  | %

Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits  The Company sponsors both
a qualified and a nonqualified, noncontributory, defined benefit retirement plan that covers substantially all employees. Benefits are based on years of service and final career-average-pay formulas as defined by the plans. The qualified plan is
funded to accumulate sufficient assets to provide for accrued benefits. The nonqualified plan, a supplemental executive plan, is not funded; the Company pays any benefits due under this plan on a monthly basis.

The Company also sponsors a defined benefit health care plan and a life insurance benefit plan for substantially all retired employees. The Company
measures the costs of its obligations for these plans based on its health care cost trends and actuarial assumptions. The net periodic costs are recognized as employees render the services necessary to earn these postretirement benefits. (For
additional information, see Note 15  Employee and Retiree Benefit Plans.)



54



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 1 - Significant Accounting
Policies (cont.)



Advertising Costs  Advertising costs, primarily related to marketing
efforts for the Companys real estate developments, are expensed as incurred. These costs amounted to $1,148,000 in 2007, $863,000 in 2006 and $790,000 in 2005, and are reflected in cost of sales on the consolidated statements of income.

Capitalized Interest  The Company capitalizes interest for qualifying constructed assets under the provisions
of SFAS 34, Capitalization of Interest Cost. Interest is mainly capitalized as an indirect cost for real estate development in the Companys real estate operations. (For additional information, see Note 17  Supplemental Cash
Flow Disclosures.)

Capital Expenditures  Capital expenditures include additions to investment in real estate
held for development and sale; timber and timberlands; and property, plant, and equipment.

Net Change in Purchased
Stumpage Inventory  Purchased stumpage inventory consists of timber-cutting rights purchased from third parties specifically for use in the Companys sawmills. Depending on the timing of acquisition and usage of this acquired stumpage
inventory, the net change in this inventory can either be a source or use of funds in the Companys consolidated statements of cash flows.

Earnings per Common Share  Earnings per share (EPS) amounts presented are calculated under the provisions of the SFAS 128, Earnings per Share. Basic earnings per share is computed
based on earnings available to common shareholders [net income/(loss) less accrued preferred dividends, if any] and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. The earnings per share assuming the diluted amounts presented are computed
based on earnings available to common shareholders and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, including shares assumed to be issued under the Companys stock incentive plans. (For a reconciliation of amounts used in per share
computations, see Note 18  Earnings per Share.)

Shipping and Handling Costs  Shipping and handling
costs, such as freight to our customers destinations, are accounted for in accordance with the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 00-10. As such, shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales in the Companys
consolidated statements of income. These costs, when included in the amount invoiced to customers, are also recognized in net sales.

Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements  In December 2004, the FASB issued a revision to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation. This revision requires the Company to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The cost will be recognized over the period
during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. This revised statement was originally effective as of the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. It applies
to all awards granted after the required effective date and to awards modified, repurchased, or canceled after that date. In April 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced the adoption of a new rule that amends the compliance dates for
SFAS 123 (R) and allows for the implementation of SFAS 123 (R) at the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after June 15, 2005. Accordingly, the Company elected to adopt the revised statement effective for its first quarter
2006 financial statements. As required, cost of stock-based compensation was recognized for the portion of outstanding awards for which the requisite service had not been rendered as of December 31, 2005, based on the grant-date fair value of
those awards. The granting of stock-based compensation is at the discretion of the Companys Executive Compensation Committee (the Committee). The effect of adoption of SFAS 123 (R) was comparable to the amounts reflected in
the pro forma disclosures as presented in the stock-based compensation policy included within this footnote.



55



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 1 - Significant Accounting
Policies (cont.)



In March 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Services of Financial
Assets. This statement amends SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities. The effective date of SFAS No. 156 is generally as of the start date of the first
fiscal year beginning after September 15, 2006. The adoption of SFAS No. 156 did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. This interpretation prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company adopted FIN 48 in January of 2007. (For additional information, see
Note 11  Income Taxes.)

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This statement
applies when other accounting pronouncements require fair value measurements. It does not require new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007,
and interim periods within those years. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, (SFAS No. 158), an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132 (R). SFAS No. 158 represents the completion of the first phase in the FASBs postretirement benefits accounting project and requires an employer that is a business entity and
sponsors one or more single employer benefit plans to (1) recognize the over-funded or under-funded status of the benefit plan in its statement of financial position, (2) recognize as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax,
the gains or losses and prior service costs of credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost, (3) measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the end of the employers
fiscal year, and (4) disclose in the notes to financial statements additional information about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service
costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation. The provisions of SFAS No. 158 were adopted as of December 31, 2006, except for the measurement date provisions, which are effective for fiscal years ending December 15, 2008.
Based on the funded status of the Companys pension plans as of September 30, 2006, the adoption of SFAS No. 158 reduced total stockholders equity by $5,016,000. (For additional information, see Note 15  Employee and
Retiree Benefit Plans.)

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, including an amendment of SFAS No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing
entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This statement is expected to expand the use of
fair value measurement, which is consistent with the FASBs long-term measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. SFAS 159 is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. The Company does not expect the
adoption of SFAS 159 to have material effect on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force of FASB
reached a consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards. Issue No. 06-11 is effective for the tax benefit of dividends declared by the Company beginning
January 1, 2008. The Company does not expect the adoption of Issue No. 06-11 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.



56



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 1  Significant Accounting
Policies (cont.)



In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) Business Combinations.
SFAS No. 141 (R) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and the
goodwill acquired. SFAS No. 141 (R) also establishes disclosure requirements to enable the evaluation of the nature and financial effects of the business combination. SFAS No. 141 (R) is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements  an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. SFAS No. 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of
consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parents ownership interest, and valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160
also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008, and will be adopted by us in the first quarter of fiscal 2009.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements. SAB 108 addresses how the effects of prior-year uncorrected misstatements should
be considered when quantifying misstatements in current-year financial statements. SAB 108 requires an entity to quantify misstatements using a balance sheet and income-statement approach and to evaluate whether either approach results in
quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. Deltic applied the provisions for its financial statements at December 31, 2006. (For additional information, see Note 19  Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108.)

Note 2  Inventories

Inventories at December 31 consisted of the following:



|                       |  |      |       |      |      
|---------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | -----
|(Thousands of dollars) |  | 2007 |       | 2006
|Logs                   |  | $    | 1,800 |      | 1,017
|Lumber                 |  |      | 3,994 |      | 3,588
|Materials and supplies |  |      | 362   |      | 519  
|                       |  |      |       |      |      
|                       |  | $    | 6,156 |      | 5,124
|                       |  |      |       |      |      

The Company utilizes the lower of cost or market basis for determining inventory carrying values.
Lumber inventory amounts at December 31, 2007 and 2006 are stated at lower of cost or net realizable value.



57



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 3  Prepaid Expenses and
Other Current Assets



Prepaid expenses and other current assets at December 31 consisted of the following:



|                               |  |      |       |      |      
|------------------------------ |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | -----
|(Thousands of dollars)         |  | 2007 |       | 2006
|Short-term deferred tax assets |  | $    | 1,545 |      | 1,654
|Prepaid expenses               |  |      | 278   |      | 262  
|Other current assets           |  |      | 479   |      | 481  
|                               |  |      |       |      |      
|                               |  | $    | 2,302 |      | 2,397
|                               |  |      |       |      |      

Note 4  Investment in Del-Tin Fiber

Deltic owns 50 percent of the membership of Del-Tin Fiber, which completed construction and commenced production operations of a medium density
fiberboard (MDF) plant near El Dorado, Arkansas, during 1998.

At December 31, 2007 and 2006, the Companys share of
the underlying net assets of Del-Tin Fiber exceeded its investment by $15,820,000 and $16,883,000, respectively. The difference relates primarily to the Companys write-off of its carrying amount for its investment in Del-Tin Fiber as of
December 31, 2002, which was not recorded by Del-Tin. The equity in earnings of Del-Tin recognized by the Company exceeds its ownership percentage of Del-Tins earnings because the difference in basis between the Company and Del-Tin is
being adjusted to account for Del-Tins operating results as if it were a consolidated subsidiary.

Cumulative net losses for the
facility have amounted to $87,514,000, of which $43,757,000 is the Companys share. During 2007, 2006, and 2005 the Company received $3,876,000, $3,950,000, and $3,800,000 in distributions from Del-Tin Fiber, respectively. Contributions to
Del-Tin Fiber by the Company as of December 31, 2007, have amounted to $80,864,000.

On August 26, 2004, the Company executed a
guarantee agreement in connection with the refinancing of the debt of Del-Tin Fiber. Under Deltics guarantee agreement, the Company unconditionally guarantees the payment of 50 percent ($20,500,000 at December 31, 2007) of Del-Tin
Fibers credit agreement. The Company estimated the proportionate fair value of its guarantee of Del-Tins credit agreement to be $3,450,000. The Company is reducing this liability systematically over the life of the credit agreement, as
the Company is released from risk under the guarantee. At December 31, 2007, the Companys unamortized balance related to the value of the guarantee was $1,207,500.

Under the operating agreement, Del-Tin Fibers employees operate the plant. Deltic has committed to provide a portion of the plants fiber and
wood fuel supply at market prices. During 2007, 2006, and 2005, Deltic sold Del-Tin Fiber approximately $3,772,000, $3,939,000, and $3,868,000, respectively, of these lumber manufacturing by-products. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, the
Company had a receivable from Del-Tin Fiber of $193,000 and $118,000, respectively.



58



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 4  Investment in Del-Tin
Fiber (cont.)



Del-Tin Fibers financial position at year-end December 29, 2007 and December 30,
2006, and results of operations for years of 2007 and 2006 consisted of the following:



|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | -
|(Thousands of dollars)                 |  | 2007 |        |   | 2006 |       
|Condensed Balance Sheet Information    |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Current assets                         |  | $    | 8,891  |   |      | 8,923  |  
|Property, plant, and equipment  net   |  |      | 82,852 |   |      | 85,393 |  
|Other noncurrent assets                |  |      | 94     |   |      | 285    |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Total assets                           |  | $    | 91,837 |   |      | 94,601 |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Current liabilities                    |  | $    | 11,163 |   |      | 10,836 |  
|Long-term debt                         |  |      | 35,000 |   |      | 39,500 |  
|Members capital                       |  |      | 45,674 |   |      | 44,265 |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Total liabilities and members capital |  | $    | 91,837 |   |      | 94,601 |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Condensed Income Statement Information |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Net sales                              |  | $    | 64,045 |   |      | 73,740 |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Costs and expenses                     |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Cost of sales                          |  |      | 51,181 |   |      | 55,227 |  
|Depreciation                           |  |      | 5,564  |   |      | 6,461  |  
|General and administrative expenses    |  |      | 2,350  |   |      | 2,701  |  
|Loss on asset disposition              |  |      | 133    |   |      | 376    |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Total costs and expenses               |  |      | 59,228 |   |      | 64,765 |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Operating income                       |  |      | 4,817  |   |      | 8,975  |  
|Interest income                        |  |      | 35     |   |      | 66     |  
|Interest and other debt expense        |  |      | (3,130 | ) |      | (3,317 | )
|Other income                           |  |      | 87     |   |      | 20     |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Net income                             |  | $    | 1,809  |   |      | 5,744  |  
|                                       |  |      |        |   |      |        |  

In performing the respective impairment evaluations, the Companys management made a number of
estimates and assumptions related to future operating results for Del-Tin Fiber, the sale of its ownership interest, the expected selling price for its investment if sold, and the ability to refinance the joint ventures long-term debt. The
management of Del-Tin Fiber has performed evaluations of possible impairment of the long-lived assets of the plant in accordance with SFAS 121 and/or SFAS 144, as applicable. To date, these analyses have indicated that no impairment exists at the
Del-Tin Fiber level.



59



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 5  Timber and Timberlands



Timber and timberlands at December 31 consisted of the following:



|                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|(Thousands of dollars)                                                    |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |        
|Purchased stumpage inventory                                              |  | $    | 3,457   |   |      | 855     |  
|Timberlands                                                               |  |      | 81,514  |   |      | 80,771  |  
|Fee timber                                                                |  |      | 207,992 |   |      | 204,826 |  
|Logging facilities                                                        |  |      | 1,979   |   |      | 1,862   |  
|                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                                                                          |  |      | 294,942 |   |      | 288,314 |  
|Less accumulated cost of fee timber harvested and facilities depreciation |  |      | (86,514 | ) |      | (80,677 | )
|                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                                                                          |  | $    | 208,428 |   |      | 207,637 |  
|                                                                          |  |      |         |   |      |         |  

Cost of fee timber harvested amounted to $5,932,000, $5,920,000, and $4,609,000 in 2007, 2006, and
2005, respectively. Depreciation of logging facilities was $39,000, $25,000, and $22,000 for the years 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

Note 6
 Property, Plant, and Equipment

Property, plant, and equipment at December 31 consisted of the following:



|                              |  |                      |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|(Thousands of dollars)        |  | Range ofUseful Lives |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |        
|Land                          |  | N/A                  |  | $    | 125     |   |      | 125     |  
|Land improvements             |  | 10-20 years          |  |      | 4,828   |   |      | 4,536   |  
|Buildings and structures      |  | 10-20 years          |  |      | 9,932   |   |      | 9,641   |  
|Machinery and equipment       |  | 3-15 years           |  |      | 90,180  |   |      | 87,491  |  
|                              |  |                      |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                              |  |                      |  |      | 105,065 |   |      | 101,793 |  
|Less accumulated depreciation |  |                      |  |      | (65,851 | ) |      | (60,868 | )
|                              |  |                      |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                              |  |                      |  | $    | 39,214  |   |      | 40,925  |  
|                              |  |                      |  |      |         |   |      |         |  

Depreciation of property, plant, and equipment charged to operations was $8,361,000, $7,830,000,
and $6,848,000 in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

Gains/(losses) on disposals or retirements of assets included in income were
$1,889,000, $(237,000), and $(68,000) in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. In 2007, the Company disposed of assets in the amount of $1,887,000 due to an involuntary conversion. (For additional information, see Note 20  Business Interruption
and Involuntary Conversion.)



60



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 7  Deferred Revenues and
Other Accrued Liabilities



Deferred revenues and other accrued liabilities at December 31 consisted of the following:



|                              |  |      |       |      |      
|----------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | -----
|(Thousands of dollars)        |  | 2007 |       | 2006
|Deferred revenues  current   |  | $    | 3,366 |      | 2,875
|Vacation accrual              |  |      | 885   |      | 848  
|Deferred compensation         |  |      | 1,932 |      | 900  
|All other current liabilities |  |      | 751   |      | 891  
|                              |  |      |       |      |      
|                              |  | $    | 6,934 |      | 5,514
|                              |  |      |       |      |      

Note 8  Other Noncurrent Liabilities

Other noncurrent liabilities at December 31 consisted of the following:



|                                              |  |      |        |       |       
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ----- | ------
|(Thousands of dollars)                        |  | 2007 |        | 2006_
|Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation |  | $    | 8,163  |       | 10,450
|Deferred compensation                         |  |      | 1,021  |       | 1,208 
|Excess thrift plan                            |  |      | 767    |       | 707   
|Excess retirement plan                        |  |      | 3,049  |       | 3,187 
|Accrued pension liability                     |  |      | 2,842  |       | 6,402 
|Deferred revenue-long term portion            |  |      | 4,116  |       | 3,621 
|Deferred condemnation proceeds                |  |      |       |       | 3,835 
|Long-term timber payables                     |  |      |       |       | 134   
|All other noncurrent payables                 |  |      | 78     |       | 76    
|                                              |  |      |        |       |       
|                                              |  | $    | 20,036 |       | 29,620
|                                              |  |      |        |       |       

Note 9  Credit Facilities

On September 9, 2005, the Company entered into an agreement with SunTrust Bank and other banks which provided an unsecured and committed revolving
credit facility totaling $260,000,000, which includes a $50,000,000 letter of credit feature. On August 7, 2007, Deltic amended its revolving credit agreement whereby the amount of commitments available under the facility were increased from
$260,000,000 to $300,000,000. Pursuant to the amendment, the term of the revolving credit agreement, subject to other provisions, was extended to September 9, 2012; pricing of applicable commitment fees and margins was amended; an option to
request an increase in the amount of aggregate revolving commitments from $300,000,000 to $350,000,000 was reinstated; certain covenants were amended and/or deleted and, provisions that permit inclusion of the pro formaimpact of certain
acquisitions in determining compliance by Deltic to applicable terms were added. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, $300,000,000 and $260,000,000, respectively, were available in excess of all borrowings outstanding under or supported by the
respective facilities. Borrowings under the current agreement bear interest at a base rate or an adjusted Eurodollar rate plus an applicable margin, depending upon the type of loan the Company executes. The applicable margin component of the
interest rate varies with the type of loan and the Companys total debt to capital ratio. There were no borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 2006. No letters of credit supported by the facility were present at December 31,
2007 and 2006. The agreement contains certain restrictive financial covenants, including a leverage ratio of no greater than .65 to 1.0, minimum timber market value greater than 175 percent of outstanding total senior indebtedness, and a fixed
charge ratio coverage. Fees associated with the current revolving credit facility include a commitment fee of .10 to .25 percent per annum on the unused portion of the committed amount. In addition, the agreement contains restrictive covenants,



61



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 9  Credit Facilities (cont.)



including limitations on the incurrence of debt; a minimum consolidated net worth of the sum of $165,000,000, plus 50 percent of cumulative consolidated net
income from April 1, 2005, and a maximum leverage ratio of .6 to 1. The Company incurred aggregate costs of $1,252,000 related to the securing of the current facility, which were deferred and are being amortized as additional interest expense
over the term of the agreement.

The Company may also borrow up to $1,000,000 under a short-term credit facility with BancorpSouth. The
agreement expires December 15, 2008, with renewal annually. The amount available to the Company under this facility is reduced by any borrowings by Deltic. As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, Deltic had no borrowings outstanding under this
line of credit, resulting in $1,000,000 available to the Company. Borrowings bear interest based upon the New York Prime. Deltic also has an agreement with BancorpSouth which provides a $2,000,000 letter of credit facility. Amounts available to the
Company under the facility are reduced by any letters of credit issued on behalf of the Company. Outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 were $357,000 and $235,000, respectively, which left $1,643,000 in 2007 and
$1,765,000 in 2006, available to Deltic.

In addition, Deltic has an agreement with Regions Bank which provides a $1,000,000 letter of
credit facility. The agreement expires in 2010. Amounts available to Deltic under the facility are reduced by any letters of credit issued on behalf of the Company. Outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2006 was $22,000, resulting in
$978,000 at December 31, 2006 being available to the Company, while there were no outstanding letters of credit at December 31, 2007, and the entire $1,000,000 was available. (For additional information regarding these financial
instruments, see Note 13  Fair Value of Financial Instruments.)

Note 10  Indebtedness

The Companys indebtedness at December 31 consisted of the following:



|                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | ------
|(Thousands of dollars)                     |  | 2007 |        | 2006
|Notes payable, 7.75%*, due 2012            |  | $    |       |      |      
|Senior notes payable, 6.7%, due 2016       |  |      | 40,000 |      | 40,000
|Senior notes payable, 6.01%, due 2008-2012 |  |      | 30,000 |      | 30,000
|                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|                                           |  |      | 70,000 |      | 70,000
|Less: Current maturities of long-term debt |  |      | 3,333  |      |      
|                                           |  |      |        |      |       
|Long-term debt at December 31              |  | $    | 66,667 |      | 70,000
|                                           |  |      |        |      |       

| | 
| | 

*Weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2007.

At the end of 2007, the Company had no balance due on the notes payable under the Companys revolving credit facility agreement with
SunTrust Bank and a group of other banks. This agreement will expire on September 9, 2012.

During 1998, the Company successfully
completed negotiation of the private placement of $40,000,000 of Series A Senior Notes (Notes) with Pacific Coast Farm Credit, a division of American AgCredit. On March 30, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with American
AgCredit PCA to amend and restate the terms of the Notes. Under the new agreement the Notes are due and payable December 18, 2016. Prior to said agreement, such Notes would have become due on December 18, 2008, pursuant to a Note Purchase
Agreement effective December 18, 1998. The interest rate for the Notes remains the same as under the 1998 agreement (6.66 percent) through December 18, 2008, and after such date the interest rate is reduced to 6.10 percent for the balance
of the term of the Notes. No installment payments are required, but the terms allow for prepayments at the option of



62



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 10  Indebtedness (cont.)



the Company. The agreement contains certain restrictive financial covenants, including a minimum consolidated net worth of the sum of $175,567,000, plus 50
percent of consolidated net income accrued during each quarter thereafter commencing after December 31, 2006, plus 100 percent of the net proceeds from any public or private offering of common or preferred stock of the company, a maximum funded
debt/capitalization ratio of .6 to 1, a fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 2.5 to 1, and to maintain a timber market value greater than 200 percent of outstanding total senior indebtedness. The Company incurred $226,000 of costs related to
the issuance of these notes, which were deferred and are being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the underlying debt. An additional $75,000 was incurred at the time of the amendment and is being amortized as additional
interest expense over the remaining term of the underlying debt. In anticipation of issuance of these notes, the Company entered into and settled an interest rate hedge contract. Upon settlement of this contract in December 1998, the Company paid
$1,081,000, which was deferred and is being amortized as other debt expense over the term of the underlying debt, resulting in an effective interest rate for these notes of approximately 6.9 percent.

On December 20, 2002, Deltic successfully completed the private placement of $30,000,000 of senior notes with Metropolitan Life and a group of other
domestic insurance companies. These unsecured notes have a Fixed stated interest rate of 6.01 percent and ultimately mature on December 20, 2012. Semiannual installments of $3,333,000, or such lesser amount as shall be outstanding, are required
beginning on December 20, 2008. The note terms allow for prepayment at the option of the Company in an amount of not less than five percent of the principal amount outstanding at the time of any prepayment. The agreement contains certain
restrictive financial covenants, including a minimum consolidated tangible net worth of the sum of $148,299,000, plus 25 percent of cumulative consolidated adjusted net income from July 1, 2002, and a maximum consolidated debt to consolidated
net capitalization ratio of .6 to 1. The Company incurred $179,000 of costs related to the issuance of these notes, which were deferred and are being amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the underlying debt.

The scheduled maturities of long-term debt for the next five years are $3,333,000 in 2008, $6,667,000 in 2009, $6,667,000 in 2010, $6,667,000 in 2011, and
$6,666,000 in 2012. (For additional information regarding financial instruments, see Note 9  Credit Facilities and Note 13  Fair Value of Financial Instruments.)

Note 11  Income Taxes

The components of income tax expense/(benefit) related to income from
operations for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, consisted of the following:



|                       |  |      |       |      |        |   |      |        |  
|---------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | -
|(Thousands of dollars) |  | 2007 |       | 2006 |        |   | 2005 |       
|Federal                |  |      |       |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Current                |  | $    | 4,985 |      | 10,988 |   |      | 10,430 |  
|Deferred               |  |      | 854   |      | (5,680 | ) |      | (3,040 | )
|                       |  |      |       |      |        |   |      |        |  
|                       |  |      | 5,839 |      | 5,308  |   |      | 7,390  |  
|State                  |  |      |       |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Current                |  |      | 1,259 |      | 158    |   |      | 10     |  
|Deferred               |  |      | 228   |      | 1,315  |   |      | (1,202 | )
|                       |  |      |       |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Total                  |  | $    | 7,326 |      | 6,781  |   |      | 6,198  |  
|                       |  |      |       |      |        |   |      |        |  



63



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 11  Income Taxes (cont.)



Significant components of deferred income tax expense/(benefit) related to income from operations for
the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, consisted of the following:



|                                                          |  |      |     |      |        |   |      |        |  
|--------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --- | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | -
|(Thousands of dollars)                                    |  | 2007 |     | 2006 |        |   | 2005 |       
|Federal                                                   |  |      |     |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Deferred tax (exclusive of valuation allowance)           |  | $    | 854 |      | (5,680 | ) |      | (3,954 | )
|Change in valuation allowance  federal income tax effect |  |      |    |      |       |   |      | 914    |  
|                                                          |  |      |     |      |        |   |      |        |  
|                                                          |  | $    | 854 |      | (5,680 | ) |      | (3,040 | )
|                                                          |  |      |     |      |        |   |      |        |  
|State                                                     |  |      |     |      |        |   |      |        |  
|Deferred tax (exclusive of valuation allowance)           |  | $    | 228 |      | 1,315  |   |      | 1,410  |  
|Change in valuation allowance                             |  |      |    |      |       |   |      | (2,612 | )
|                                                          |  |      |     |      |        |   |      |        |  
|                                                          |  | $    | 228 |      | 1,315  |   |      | (1,202 | )
|                                                          |  |      |     |      |        |   |      |        |  

A reconciliation of the U.S. statutory income tax rate to the Companys effective rates on
income from operations before income taxes consisted of the following:



|                                                                |  |      |   |  |      |    |  |      |   
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | -- |  | ---- | --
|                                                                |  | 2007 |   |  | 2006 |    |  | 2005 |   
|Statutory income tax rate                                       |  | 35   | % |  | 35   | %  |  | 35   | % 
|State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit           |  | 5    | % |  | 5    | %  |  | 4    | % 
|Change in valuation allowance, net of federal income tax effect |  |     |   |  |     |    |  | (8   | )%
|Other                                                           |  |     |   |  | (3   | )% |  | (1   | )%
|                                                                |  |      |   |  |      |    |  |      |   
|Effective income tax rate                                       |  | 40   | % |  | 37   | %  |  | 30   | % 
|                                                                |  |      |   |  |      |    |  |      |   

An analysis of the Companys deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, showing the tax effects of significant temporary differences, consisted of the following:



|                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|(Thousands of dollars)                                  |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |        
|Deferred tax assets                                     |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Investment in real estate held for development and sale |  | $    | 14,845  |   |      | 14,255  |  
|Postretirement and other employee benefits              |  |      | 9,373   |   |      | 10,247  |  
|Other deferred tax assets                               |  |      | 3,619   |   |      | 3,161   |  
|                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total deferred tax assets                               |  |      | 27,837  |   |      | 27,663  |  
|Less valuation allowance                                |  |      |        |   |      |        |  
|                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total deferred tax assets  net                         |  |      | 27,837  |   |      | 27,663  |  
|                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Deferred tax liabilities                                |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Investment in Del-Tin Fiber                             |  |      | (5,800  | ) |      | (5,479  | )
|Timber and timberlands                                  |  |      | (18,794 | ) |      | (18,764 | )
|Property, plant, and equipment                          |  |      | (4,391  | ) |      | (5,251  | )
|Other deferred tax liabilities                          |  |      | (4,107  | ) |      | (693    | )
|                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total deferred tax liabilities                          |  |      | (33,092 | ) |      | (30,187 | )
|                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Net deferred tax liabilities                            |  | $    | (5,255  | ) |      | (2,524  | )
|                                                        |  |      |         |   |      |         |  



64



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 11  Income Taxes (cont.)



Short-term deferred tax assets of $1,545,000 and $1,654,000 at December 31, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, are included in the consolidated balance sheets in prepaid expenses and other current assets for the respective years.

In
assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, Deltics management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the Companys total deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of
these deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the temporary differences are anticipated to reverse,
management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of its deferred tax assets at December 31, 2007, as reductions of future taxable income or by utilizing available tax planning strategies. However, the
amount of the net deferred tax assets considered realizable could be adjusted in the future if estimates of taxable income are revised. In 2005, the Company reduced its valuation allowance to zero based on current projections of increased future
taxable income. The net change in the valuation allowances was a decrease of $2,612,000 in 2005 and was principally due to changes in potential use or expiration of net operating losses for state tax purposes. As of March 31, 2007, the Company
had utilized the benefits of these state net operating losses in their entirety.

At December 31, 2005, the Company had operating loss
carryforwards for state tax purposes of approximately $31,546,000. At December 31, 2006 the Company had prepaid federal and state income taxes totaling $44,000 reflected in the consolidated balance sheet in prepaid expenses and other current
assets. At December 31, 2007, the Company had a federal and state income tax liability of $1,371,000 and $433,000 in related federal benefit in deferred charges and other assets. Upon the initial adoption of FIN 48, the Company recorded a net
cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of January 1, 2007 (which increased retained earnings by $524,000 as of such date) primarily related to certain previously unrecognized tax benefits that did not meet the criteria for
recognition upon adoption of FIN 48.

The Company is no longer subject to federal and state income tax examination by tax authorities for
years before 2004.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits (excluding both interest and any
related federal benefits) is as follows:



|                                                |  |   |       |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | - | ----- | -
|(Thousands of dollars)                          |  |   |      
|Balance at January 1, 2007                      |  | $ | 230   |  
|Increases related to current year tax positions |  |   | 1,236 |  
|Lapse of statute                                |  |   | (84   | )
|                                                |  |   |       |  
|Balance at December 31, 2007                    |  | $ | 1,382 |  
|                                                |  |   |       |  

If the Company were to prevail on all unrecognized tax benefits recorded on the balance sheet,
approximately $942,000 would benefit the effective tax rate. Depending upon examinations by tax authorities or the expiration of the statute of limitations, it is reasonably possible that the related unrecognized tax benefits for tax positions
previously taken may decrease by up to $1,284,000 within the next twelve months. The actual amount of such decrease, if any, will depend on several future developments and events, many of which are outside our control. The amount included in current
taxes payable for state uncertain tax positions may be reclassified to a long-term item in the subsequent year. The Companys policy is to recognize



65



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 11  Income Taxes (cont.)



interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in other expenses. During the year ended December 31, 2007, the
Company recognized approximately $2,700 in interest expense from these items. The Company had approximately $42,000 accrued in deferred revenue and other accrued liabilities for interest and penalties at December 31, 2007.

Note 12  Stockholders Rights Plan

The Company
has a Stockholders Rights Plan (Rights Plan), which provides for each eligible common shareholder to receive a dividend of one preferred stock purchase right (Right) for each outstanding share of the Companys common
stock held. On October 19, 2006, the Companys Board of Directors amended the Rights Plan to, among other items, extend its term to December 31, 2016, and to increase the exercise price of the rights to $200 per share. The Rights will
detach from the common stock and become exercisable: (1) following a specified period of time after the date of the first public announcement that a person or group of affiliated or associated persons (Acquiring Person), has become
the beneficial owner of 15 percent or more of the Companys common stock or (2) following a specified amount of time of the commencement of a tender or exchange offer by any Acquiring Person, which would, if consummated, result in such
persons becoming the beneficial owner of 15 percent or more of the Companys common stock. In either case, the detachment of the Rights from the common stock is subject to extension by a majority of the directors of the Company. The Rights have
certain anti-takeover effects and will cause substantial dilution to any Acquiring Person that attempts to acquire the Company without conditioning the offer on a substantial number of Rights being acquired. The Rights are not intended to prevent a
takeover, but rather are designed to enhance the ability of the Board of Directors of the Company to negotiate with an acquiror on behalf of all the shareholders. Other terms of the Rights are set forth in, and the foregoing description is qualified
in its entirety by, the Rights Agreement between the Company and Harris N.A. (formerly known as Harris Trust and Savings Bank), as Rights Agent.

Note
13  Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial
instruments held by the Company at December 31, 2007 and 2006. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. The table excludes financial
instruments included in current assets and liabilities, except current maturities of long-term debt, all of which have fair values approximating carrying values.



|                                             |  |                |         |   |                     |         |   |                |         |   |                     |         |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -------------- | ------- | - | ------------------- | ------- | - | -------------- | ------- | - | ------------------- | ------- | -
|                                             |  | 2007           |         |   | 2006                |        
|(Thousands of dollars)                       |  | CarryingAmount |         |   | EstimatedFair Value |         |   | CarryingAmount |         |   | EstimatedFair Value |        
|Financial liabilities                        |  |                |         |   |                     |         |   |                |         |   |                     |         |  
|Long-term debt, including current maturities |  | $              | (70,000 | ) |                     | (77,216 | ) |                | (70,000 | ) |                     | (70,657 | )
|Guarantees                                   |  | $              | (1,207  | ) |                     | (1,207  | ) |                | (1,898  | ) |                     | (1,898  | )

Long-term debt, including current maturities  The fair value is
estimated by discounting the scheduling debt payment streams to present value based on current rates at which the Company could borrow funds with similar remaining maturities.

Guarantees The carrying amount approximates its fair value.



66



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 14  Concentration of Credit
Risks



Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to credit risk are trade accounts
receivable. These receivables normally arise from the sale of wood products and real estate. Concentration of credit with respect to these trade accounts receivable is limited due to the large number of customers comprising the Companys
customer base. No single recurring customer accounted for a significant amount of the Companys sales of wood products or real estate in 2007, 2006, or 2005. At December 31, 2007 and 2006, there was no significant accounts receivable from
a single customer. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally does not require collateral to support accounts receivable.

Note 15  Employee and Retiree Benefit Plans

The Company has both funded and unfunded noncontributory defined benefit
retirement plans that cover the majority of its employees. The plans provide defined benefits based on years of service and final average salary. Deltic also has other postretirement benefit plans covering substantially all of its employees. The
health care plan is contributory with participants contributions adjusted as needed. The life insurance plan is noncontributory. The Company uses a September 30 measurement date for its plans.



|                                          |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------- | ------ | - | ---------------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------ | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                                          |  | FundedQualifiedRetirementPlan |        |   | UnfundedNonqualifiedRetirementPlan |        |   | OtherPostretirementPlans |       
|(Thousands of dollars)                    |  | 2007                          |        |   | 2006                               |        |   | 2007                     |        |   | 2006 |        |   | 2007 |        |   | 2006 |        
|Change in projected benefit obligation    |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Benefit obligation at January 1           |  | $                             | 22,750 |   |                                    | 21,213 |   |                          | 3,187  |   |      | 2,726  |   |      | 10,450 |   |      | 9,737   |  
|Service cost                              |  |                               | 1,042  |   |                                    | 962    |   |                          | 138    |   |      | 70     |   |      | 292    |   |      | 550     |  
|Interest cost                             |  |                               | 1,288  |   |                                    | 1,152  |   |                          | 175    |   |      | 143    |   |      | 451    |   |      | 525     |  
|Participant contributions                 |  |                               |       |   |                                    |       |   |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |   |      | 61      |  
|Plan amendment                            |  |                               |       |   |                                    |       |   |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      | (1,853 | ) |      |        |  
|Actuarial (gain)/loss                     |  |                               | (1,967 | ) |                                    | (37    | ) |                          | (221   | ) |      | 490    |   |      | (751   | ) |      | 34      |  
|Benefits paid                             |  |                               | (606   | ) |                                    | (540   | ) |                          | (230   | ) |      | (242   | ) |      | (426   | ) |      | (457    | )
|                                          |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Benefit obligation at December 31         |  | $                             | 22,507 |   |                                    | 22,750 |   |                          | 3,049  |   |      | 3,187  |   |      | 8,163  |   |      | 10,450  |  
|                                          |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Change in plan assets                     |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Fair value of plan assets at January 1    |  | $                             | 16,348 |   |                                    | 14,442 |   |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |   |      |        |  
|Actual return on plan assets              |  |                               | 2,525  |   |                                    | 1,305  |   |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |   |      |        |  
|Employer contributions                    |  |                               | 1,474  |   |                                    | 1,313  |   |                          | 230    |   |      | 242    |   |      | 426    |   |      | 396     |  
|Participant contributions                 |  |                               |       |   |                                    |       |   |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |   |      | 61      |  
|Benefits paid                             |  |                               | (606   | ) |                                    | (540   | ) |                          | (230   | ) |      | (242   | ) |      | (426   | ) |      | (457    | )
|Expenses                                  |  |                               | (76    | ) |                                    | (172   | ) |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |   |      |        |  
|                                          |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Fair value of plan assets at December 311 |  | $                             | 19,665 |   |                                    | 16,348 |   |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      |       |   |      |        |  
|                                          |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Funded status of plans                    |  | $                             | (2,842 | ) |                                    | (6,402 | ) |                          | (3,049 | ) |      | (3,187 | ) |      | (8,163 | ) |      | (10,450 | )
|                                          |  |                               |        |   |                                    |       
|Assumptions                               |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Weighted average discount rate            |  |                               | 6.33   | % |                                    | 5.75   | % |                          | 6.33   | % |      | 5.75   | % |      | 6.25   | % |      | 5.50    | %
|Rate of compensation increase             |  |                               | 5.28   | % |                                    | 4.60   | % |                          | 5.28   | % |      | 4.60   | % |      | N/A    |   |      | N/A     |  



|1 | Primarily includes listed stocks and bonds, government securities, and U.S. agency bonds.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



67



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 15  Employee and Retiree
Benefit Plans (cont.)



|                                                             |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- | ------ | - | ---------------------------------- | ------ | - | ------------------------ | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------- | -
|                                                             |  | FundedQualifiedRetirementPlan |        |   | UnfundedNonqualifiedRetirementPlan |        |   | OtherPostretirementPlans |       
|(Thousands of dollars)                                       |  | 2007                          |        |   | 2006                               |        |   | 2007                     |        |   | 2006 |        |   | 2007 |        |   | 2006 |        
|Amounts recognized in the balance sheet                      |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Noncurrent liability                                         |  | $                             | (2,842 | ) |                                    | (6,402 | ) |                          | (3,049 | ) |      | (3,187 | ) |      | (8,163 | ) |      | (10,450 | )
|Deferred income taxes  net                                  |  | $                             | 979    |   |                                    | 1,884  |   |                          | 222    |   |      | 317    |   |      | (173   | ) |      | 886     |  
|Accumulated other comprehensive income                       |  | $                             | 1,517  |   |                                    | 3,254  |   |                          | 345    |   |      | 492    |   |      | (269   | ) |      | 1,374   |  
|                                                             |  |                               |        |   |                                    |       
|Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|Funding after measurement date                               |  | $                             | 575    |   |                                    | 257    |   |                          | 66     |   |      | 60     |   |      |       |   |      |        |  
|Net unrecognized loss                                        |  |                               | 1,688  |   |                                    | 4,802  |   |                          | 577    |   |      | 836    |   |      | 1,192  |   |      | 2,053   |  
|Unrecognized prior service cost (credit)                     |  |                               | 233    |   |                                    | 295    |   |                          | (76    | ) |      | (87    | ) |      |       |   |      | 166     |  
|Plan amendment                                               |  |                               |       |   |                                    |       |   |                          |       |   |      |       |   |      | (1,654 | ) |      |        |  
|Tax effects of changes                                       |  |                               | (979   | ) |                                    | (2,100 | ) |                          | (222   | ) |      | (317   | ) |      | 193    |   |      | (845    | )
|                                                             |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  
|                                                             |  | $                             | 1,517  |   |                                    | 3,254  |   |                          | 345    |   |      | 492    |   |      | (269   | ) |      | 1,374   |  
|                                                             |  |                               |        |   |                                    |        |   |                          |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |         |  

Components of net periodic retirement expense and other postretirement benefits expense consisted
of the following:



|                                          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|----------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ----- | -
|(Thousands of dollars)                    |  | 2007 |        |   | 2006 |        |   | 2005 |      
|Funded qualified retirement plan          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|Service cost                              |  | $    | 1,042  |   |      | 962    |   |      | 813   |  
|Interest cost                             |  |      | 1,288  |   |      | 1,152  |   |      | 1,067 |  
|Expected return on plan assets            |  |      | (1,246 | ) |      | (1,108 | ) |      | (962  | )
|Amortization of prior service cost        |  |      | 62     |   |      | 62     |   |      | 62    |  
|Amortization of actuarial loss            |  |      | 201    |   |      | 241    |   |      | 144   |  
|                                          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|Net retirement expense                    |  | $    | 1,347  |   |      | 1,309  |   |      | 1,124 |  
|                                          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|Unfunded nonqualified retirement plan     |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|Service cost                              |  | $    | 138    |   |      | 70     |   |      | 23    |  
|Interest cost                             |  |      | 175    |   |      | 142    |   |      | 161   |  
|Amortization of prior service credit      |  |      | (11    | ) |      | (11    | ) |      | (11   | )
|Amortization of actuarial loss            |  |      | 41     |   |      | 7      |   |      | 7     |  
|                                          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|Net periodic benefit cost                 |  | $    | 343    |   |      | 208    |   |      | 180   |  
|                                          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|Other postretirement benefits             |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|Service cost                              |  | $    | 292    |   |      | 550    |   |      | 478   |  
|Interest cost                             |  |      | 451    |   |      | 525    |   |      | 502   |  
|Amortization of prior service cost        |  |      |       |   |      | 18     |   |      | 18    |  
|Amortization of plan amendment            |  |      | (199   | ) |      |       |   |      |      |  
|Amortization of actuarial loss            |  |      | 109    |   |      | 79     |   |      | 50    |  
|                                          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  
|Net other postretirement benefits expense |  | $    | 653    |   |      | 1,172  |   |      | 1,048 |  
|                                          |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |       |  



68



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 15  Employee and Retiree
Benefit Plans (cont.)



|                                                                                              |  |      |        |   |      |      |   |      |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ---- | - | ---- | ---- | -
|                                                                                              |  | 2007 |        |   | 2006 |      |   | 2005 |     
|Assumptions  pension plans                                                                   |  |      |        |   |      |      |   |      |      |  
|Weighted average discount rate                                                                |  |      | 6.33   | % |      | 5.75 | % |      | 6.00 | %
|Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets                                              |  |      | 7.50   | % |      | 7.50 | % |      | 7.50 | %
|Rate of compensation increase                                                                 |  |      | 5.28   | % |      | 4.60 | % |      | 4.60 | %
|                                                                                              |  |      |       
|Assumptions  other postretirement                                                            |  |      |        |   |      |      |   |      |      |  
|Weighted average discount rate                                                                |  |      | 5.50   | % |      | 5.50 | % |      | 6.00 | %
|                                                                                              |  |      |       
|Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income |  |      |        |   |      |      |   |      |      |  
|Funding after measurement date                                                                |  | $    | (325   | ) |      |     |   |      |     |  
|Net unrecognized loss                                                                         |  |      | 4,234  |   |      | 560  |   |      | (531 | )
|Unrecognized prior service cost (credit)                                                      |  |      | 217    |   |      | (69  | ) |      | (69  | )
|Plan amendment                                                                                |  |      | 1,654  |   |      |     |   |      |      |  
|Tax effects of changes                                                                        |  |      | (2,253 | ) |      | (193 | ) |      | 210  |  
|                                                                                              |  |      |        |   |      |      |   |      |      |  
|Total recognized in other comprehensive income                                                |  | $    | 3,527  |   |      | 298  |   |      | (390 | )
|                                                                                              |  |      |        |   |      |      |   |      |      |  

The estimated net loss and net prior service cost for the defined benefit pension plans that will
be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $22,000 and $51,000, respectively. The estimated net loss and plan amendment for the other defined benefit postretirement plans
that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are $35,000 and $199,000, respectively.

The discount rate assumption used by the Company to measure benefit obligations and net periodic expenses is based on the estimated interest rate at which the benefit obligations of its plans can be settled. In
determining the discount rate as of the measurement date of its plans for 2006 and 2005, the Company considered corporate bonds with ratings of AAA or AA, which are deemed high quality, as well as the general level of interest rates since the last
measurement date. For 2007, the Company used a discount rate durational study of OPEB liabilities to determine an appropriate discount rate.

To develop the expected long-term rate of return on asset assumption, the Company considered the current level of expected returns on risk-free investments (primarily government bonds), the historical level of the risk premium associated
with the other asset classes in which the portfolio is invested, and the expectations for future returns of each asset class. The expected return for each asset class was then weighted, based on the target asset association, to develop the expected
long-term rate of return on asset assumption for the portfolio. The returns were adjusted to account for plan expenses. This resulted in the selection of the 7.50 percent assumption.

Retirement Plans  The accumulated benefit obligation for the Companys retirement plans were $20,670,000 at
December 31, 2007 and $20,197,000 at December 31, 2006. For the Companys qualified plan, the projected benefit obligation (PBO) exceeded the fair value of plan assets by $2,843,000 and $6,402,000 at December 31, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The Company does not fund its nonqualified plan; therefore, this plan has no assets. The PBO for this nonqualified plan was $3,049,000 at year-end 2007 and $3,187,000 at year-end 2006.



69



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 15  Employee and Retiree
Benefit Plans (cont.)



The weighted average asset allocation for the Companys qualified retirement plan at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, by asset category, consisted of the following:



|                                             |  |                      |  |      |   |  |                      |  |      |  
|-------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ---- | - |  | -------------------- |  | ---- | -
|                                             |  | 2007TargetAllocation |  | 2007 |   |  | 2006TargetAllocation |  | 2006 |  
|Equity securities                            |  | 45-65%               |  | 68   | % |  | 45-65%               |  | 69   | %
|Debt securities (including cash equivalents) |  | 35-55%               |  | 32   | % |  | 35-55%               |  | 31   | %
|                                             |  |                      |  |      |   |  |                      |  |      |  
|                                             |  |                      |  | 100  | % |  |                      |  | 100  | %
|                                             |  |                      |  |      |   |  |                      |  |      |  

Equity securities generally consist of common stocks. Investments in debt securities are limited
to U.S. government securities and high quality corporate bonds. Cash equivalents are limited to U.S. government obligations.

The primary
investment goals are: (1) preservation of principle, (2) investment in a balanced portfolio, and (3) growth of assets to exceed inflation. To meet these goals, the Companys Investment Committee has adopted the above target asset
allocation ranges as outlined in the investment policy for the qualified retirement plan. These ranges allow for flexibility to meet investment goals without exposing the plans assets to excessive risk.

The current funding status of the qualified retirement plan is expected to require the Company to make a contribution during 2008 of $896,000. Deltic
expects to contribute $225,000 in 2008 to fund benefits to be paid from its nonqualified retirement plan. Estimated benefits to be paid from the retirement plans amount to $860,000 in 2008; $915,000 in 2009; $961,000 in 2010; $1,032,000 in 2011;
$1,143,000 in 2012; and $7,453,000 in the period 2013 through 2017.

Other Postretirement Benefits  The
Company sponsors a plan that provides comprehensive health care benefits (supplementing Medicare benefits for those eligible) and life insurance benefits for retired employees. Costs are accrued for this plan during the service lives of covered
employees. Retirees contribute a portion of the self-funded cost of health care benefits and the Company contributes the remainder. The Company pays premiums for life insurance coverage arranged through an insurance company. The health care plan is
funded on a pay-as-you-go basis. The Company retains the right to modify or terminate the benefits and/or cost sharing provisions.

During
the third quarter of 2004, Deltic applied the effect of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 to its obligation under the Companys other postretirement benefits plan. The prescription drug benefits offered
by the Companys plan were determined to be at least actuarially equivalent to those provided with the Act, which qualifies the plan to receive federal subsidy payments under Medicare Part D. Estimated benefit payments to be paid by the Company
for other postretirement benefits, net of the expected Medicare Part D subsidy, amount to $470,000 in 2008; $504,000 in 2009; $560,000 in 2010; $567,000 in 2011; $574,000 in 2012; and $3,169,000 in the period 2013 through 2017. The Company expects
to contribute approximately $470,000 to its other postretirement benefit plans in 2008. Effective January 1, 2007, Deltic no longer offers prescription drug coverage under its other postretirement benefits plan to post-65 retirees.



70



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 15  Employee and Retiree
Benefit Plans (cont.)



In determining the benefit obligation for health care at December 31, 2007, health care
inflation cost was assumed to increase at an annual rate of eight percent in 2008, then decreasing one percent per year to an ultimate cost trend rate of five percent in 2011. Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the
amounts reported for the health care plan. A one percentage-point increase in the assumed health care cost trend would increase the aggregate service and interest cost components of periodic benefit cost for 2007 by $105,000 and the benefit
obligation by $901,000, while a one percentage-point decrease in the assumed rate would decrease the 2007 cost components by $86,000 and the benefit obligation by $761,000.

The Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Post Retirement Plans  An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 87, 88, 106 and 132 (R) as of December 31, 2006, which require that the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans be fully recognized in
the balance sheet. The incremental effects of applying SFAS No. 158 on individual line items in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2006, are as follows:



|                                       |  |                   |          |   |             |        |   |                  |          |  
|-------------------------------------- |  | ----------------- | -------- | - | ----------- | ------ | - | ---------------- | -------- | -
|                                       |  | BeforeApplication |          |   | Adjustments |        |   | AfterApplication |         
|Deferred charges and other assets      |  | $                 | 295      |   |             | 295    |   |                  |         |  
|Other noncurrent liabilities           |  |                   | (21,619  | ) |             | (8,001 | ) |                  | (29,620  | )
|Deferred income taxes  net            |  |                   | (7,458   | ) |             | 3,280  |   |                  | (4,178   | )
|Accumulated other comprehensive income |  |                   | 104      |   |             | 5,016  |   |                  | 5,120    |  
|Stockholders equity                   |  |                   | (212,497 | ) |             | 5,016  |   |                  | (207,481 | )

The adjustments for other noncurrent liabilities as of December 31, 2006, consist of the
following retirement plans:



|                                      |  |   |      
|------------------------------------- |  | - | -----
|Funded qualified retirement plan      |  | $ | 5,031
|Unfunded nonqualified retirement plan |  |   | 710  
|Other postretirement plan             |  |   | 2,260
|                                      |  |   |      
|                                      |  | $ | 8,001
|                                      |  |   |      

The measurement date used by the Company for the recognition provision of SFAS No. 158 was
September 30, 2007 and 2006, for years ending December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The measurement provision of SFAS No. 158 will be effective for the Company for its December 31, 2008 year-end.

Thrift Plan  Employees of the Company may participate in its thrift plan by allotting up to a specific percentage of their
base pay. The Company matches contributions at a stated percentage of each employees allotment. Company contributions to this plan were $588,730 in 2007, $653,000 in 2006, and $625,000 in 2005.



71



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007



Note 16  Incentive Plans

Stock Incentive Plan

On April 25, 2002, the Companys shareholders approved the Deltic
Timber Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the 2002 Plan). The 2002 Plan replaced the 1996 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1996 Plan), which was terminated. At December 31, 2007, remaining outstanding options under the 1996
Plan totaled 25,179 shares, all of which were exercisable. Outstanding options under the 1996 Plan will expire from 2008 to 2011 if not exercised and have an average exercise price of $25.23 based on the fair market value at date of grant.

The 2002 Plan permits annual awards of shares of the Companys common stock to executives, other key employees, and nonemployee
directors. Under the plan, the Executive Compensation Committee (the Committee) is authorized to grant: (1) stock options; (2) restricted stock and restricted stock units; (3) performance units; and (4) other
stock-based awards, including stock appreciation rights and rights to dividends and dividend equivalents. The number of shares available for issuance under the 2002 Plan is 1,800,000 shares unless adjustment is determined necessary by the Committee
as the result of dividend or other distribution, recapitalization, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, split-up, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of common stock, or other corporate transaction in
order to prevent dilution or enlargement of benefits or potential benefits intended to be made available. At December 31, 2007, 1,282,848 of these 1,800,000 shares were available for award under the 2002 Plan. No participant in the 2002 Plan
may receive options and stock appreciation rights in any calendar-year that relates to more than 50,000 shares, and the maximum number of shares which may be awarded as restricted stock and restricted stock units or other stock-based awards is
180,000 shares. The Company has a policy of issuing treasury stock to satisfy all share-based incentive plans. The cost of stock-based compensation is reflected in general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income and
amounted to $2,676,000 in 2007, $1,207,000 in 2006, and $1,179,000 in 2005. (For additional information regarding the Companys stock-based compensation, including the effect on net income/(loss) and earnings per share if the Company had
applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS 123 (R) for 2005, see Note 1  Significant Accounting Policies.)

Stock Options  For each option granted under the 2002 Plan, the Committee fixes the option price at not less than fair market value on the date of the grant and the option term, not to exceed 10 years from date of grant. The
resulting fixed stock-based compensation cost was recognized over the vesting period for these options. New options granted in 1997 and 1998 were for ten years and primarily incentive. Options granted since 1998 have been for ten years and
nonqualified. All outstanding options have an option price not less than the market value on the grant date, with a range in option prices of $22.0625 to $53.75 per share. For options granted in 1997, exclusive of replacement options, one-half could
be exercised or surrendered after two years and the remainder after three years. For options granted from 1998 through 2001, one-half could be exercised or surrendered after one year and the remainder after three years. During 2003, the Company
granted options for 129,750 shares. For 121,750 shares granted in 2003, one-half could be exercised or surrendered after one year and the remainder after three years. The remaining 8,000 shares awarded to nonemployee directors at an option price of
$24.31 in 2003, were vested immediately when awarded. During 2004, the Company granted options for 39,687 shares, at an option price of $32.565, one-fourth may be exercised or surrendered after each one-year period over the subsequent four years
from issuance. The Company granted options for 36,160 shares in 2005 at an option price of $44.355, one-fourth may be exercised or surrendered after each one-year period over the subsequent four years from issuance. The Company granted options for
30,956 shares in 2006 at an option price of



72



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 16  Incentive Plans (cont.)



$53.75, one-fourth may be exercised or surrendered after each one-year period over the subsequent four years from issuance. The Company granted options for
35,344 shares in 2007 at an average option price of $54.15; one-fourth may be exercised or surrendered after each one-year period over the subsequent four years from issuance.

Stock Options  A summary of stock options as of December 31, 2007, and changes during the year ended are presented
below:



|                                 |  |         |   |  |                                |       |                                                  |     |                                 |   |      
|-------------------------------- |  | ------- | - |  | ------------------------------ | ----- | ------------------------------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------- | - | -----
|                                 |  | Shares  |   |  | Weighted AverageExercise Price |       | Weighted AverageRemainingContractualTerm (Years) |     | AggregateIntrinsicValue( $ 000)
|Outstanding at January 1, 2007   |  | 255,031 |   |  | $                              | 33.25 |                                                  |     |                                 |   |      
|Granted                          |  | 35,344  |   |  |                                | 54.15 |                                                  |     |                                 |   |      
|Exercised                        |  | (37,133 | ) |  |                                | 26.93 |                                                  |     |                                 |   |      
|Forfeited/expired                |  | (3,430  | ) |  |                                | 39.30 |                                                  |     |                                 |   |      
|                                 |  |         |   |  |                                |       |                                                  |     |                                 |   |      
|Outstanding at December 31, 2007 |  | 249,812 |   |  | $                              | 37.06 |                                                  | 5.1 |                                 | $ | 3,605
|                                 |  |         |   |  |                                |       |                                                  |     |                                 |   |      
|Exercisable at December 31, 2007 |  | 182,619 |   |  | $                              | 32.22 |                                                  | 3.9 |                                 | $ | 3,519
|                                 |  |         |   |  |                                |       |                                                  |     |                                 |   |      

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of stock options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $15.78, $16.24, and $15.35, respectively. The intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005 was $1,095,000, $2,291,000, and $1,462,000, respectively.

Additional information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2007, consisted of the following:



|                         |  |                     |  |                     |  |                      |       |                 |         |                      |   |      
|------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | ------------------- |  | -------------------- | ----- | --------------- | ------- | -------------------- | - | -----
|                         |  | Options Outstanding |  | Options Exercisable
|Range of Exercise Prices |  | NumberofOptions     |  | AverageLifein Years |  | AverageExercisePrice |       | NumberofOptions |         | AverageExercisePrice
|$22.0625 - $ 29.2950     |  | 123,804             |  | 3.8                 |  | $                    | 27.55 |                 | 123,804 |                      | $ | 27.55
|$32.5650 - $ 50.0000     |  | 62,169              |  | 5.1                 |  |                      | 38.64 |                 | 43,308  |                      |   | 37.92
|$51.0000 - $ 57.0300     |  | 63,839              |  | 7.6                 |  |                      | 53.97 |                 | 15,507  |                      |   | 53.62
|                         |  |                     |  |                     |  |                      |       |                 |         |                      |   |      
|                         |  | 249,812             |  | 5.1                 |  |                      | 37.06 |                 | 182,619 |                      |   | 32.22
|                         |  |                     |  |                     |  |                      |       |                 |         |                      |   |      

Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units  The Committee may grant
restricted stock and restricted stock units to selected employees, with conditions to vesting for each grant established by the Committee. During the vesting period, the grantee may vote and receive dividends on the shares, but shares are subject to
transfer restrictions and are all, or partially, forfeited if a grantee terminates, depending on the reason.



73



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 16  Incentive Plans (cont.)



A summary of unvested restricted stock as of December 31, 2007, and changes during the year then
ended are presented below:



|                              |  |        |   |  |                                      |      
|----------------------------- |  | ------ | - |  | ------------------------------------ | -----
|                              |  | Shares |   |  | Weighted AverageGrant-DateFair
Value
|Unvested at January 1, 2007   |  | 48,522 |   |  | $                                    | 41.74
|Granted                       |  | 19,006 |   |  |                                      | 53.01
|Vested                        |  |       |   |  |                                      |     
|Forfeited                     |  | (828   | ) |  |                                      | 44.43
|                              |  |        |   |  |                                      |      
|Unvested at December 31, 2007 |  | 66,700 |   |  | $                                    | 44.91
|                              |  |        |   |  |                                      |      

As of December 31, 2007, there was $1,169,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested restricted stock. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. No shares of restricted stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2007.

Performance Units  Performance units granted under the 2002 Plan may be denominated in cash, common shares, other
securities, other awards allowed under the 2002 Plan, or other property and shall confer on the holder thereof rights valued as determined by the Committee and payable to, or exercisable by, the holder, in whole or in part, upon achievement of such
performance goals during such performance periods as the Committee shall establish. Subject to the terms of the 2002 Plan, the performance goals to be achieved during any performance period, the length of any performance period, the amount of any
performance unit granted, and any payment or transfer to be made pursuant to any performance unit shall be determined by the Committee. During 2007, 2006, and 2005, the Company issued performance units in the form of restricted stock with specified
performance requirements. During the vesting period, the grantee may vote and receive dividends on the shares, but shares are subject to transfer restrictions and are all, or partially, forfeited if a grantee terminates, depending on the reason.

A summary of unvested restricted stock performance units as of December 31, 2007, and changes during the year then ended are presented
below:



|                              |  |        |   |  |                                       |      
|----------------------------- |  | ------ | - |  | ------------------------------------- | -----
|                              |  | Shares |   |  | Weighted AverageGrant- DateFair
Value
|Unvested at January 1, 2007   |  | 36,999 |   |  | $                                     | 43.52
|Granted                       |  | 10,570 |   |  |                                       | 55.97
|Vested                        |  |       |   |  |                                       |     
|Forfeited                     |  | (947   | ) |  |                                       | 46.06
|                              |  |        |   |  |                                       |      
|Unvested at December 31, 2007 |  | 46,622 |   |  | $                                     | 46.29
|                              |  |        |   |  |                                       |      

As of December 31, 2007, there was $783,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested restricted stock performance units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years. No shares of restricted performance stock vested during the year ended December 31, 2007.



74



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 16  Incentive Plans (cont.)



During 2007 two executives retired. The Company compensation committee granted them a modification in
their employment continuation requirement. The Company recognized incremental stock-based compensation expense of $1,076,000 for restricted stock awards and $177,000 for stock options in 2007 related to the modification of these awards.

Other Stock-based Awards  The Committee may also grant other awards, including but not limited to, stock appreciation
rights and rights to dividends and dividend equivalents that are denominated, or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to shares of the Companys common stock, including securities convertible
in its common stock, as deemed by the Committee to be consistent with the purpose of the 2002 Plan. No such other stock-based awards have been granted.

Incentive Compensation Plan

Cash Awards  The Company has an incentive
compensation plan that provides for annual cash awards to officers and key employees based on actual results for a year compared to objectives established by the Executive Compensation Committee, which administers the Plan, at the beginning of that
year. The Company recorded expenses for cash incentive awards of $825,000, $928,000, and $1,571,000, in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. The Company had accrued provisions for cash incentive awards totaling $852,000 and $900,000 at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, reflected in the consolidated balance sheets in deferred revenues and other accrued liabilities.

Note 17
 Supplemental Cash Flows Disclosures

Income taxes paid, net of refunds, were $4,885,000, $8,516,000, and $10,654,000 in 2007,
2006, and 2005, respectively. Interest paid was $5,028,000, $4,931,000, and $5,478,000 in 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. Capitalized interest was $769,000 and $1,184,000 during 2007 and 2006, respectively. No interest was capitalized in 2005.
(For additional information, see Note 19  Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108.) Noncash investing and financing activities excluded from the consolidated statement of cash flows was the noncash issuance of restricted stock awards in the
amount of $681,000 in 2007 and $528,000 in 2006.

(Increases)/decreases in operating working capital other than cash and cash equivalents,
for each of the three years ended December 31 consisted of the following:



|                                                |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | - | ---- | ------ | -
|(Thousands of dollars)                          |  | 2007 |        |   | 2006 |        |   | 2005 |       
|Trade accounts receivable                       |  | $    | 206    |   |      | 2,057  |   |      | 278    |  
|Other receivables                               |  |      | 611    |   |      | (420   | ) |      | (59    | )
|Inventories                                     |  |      | (1,032 | ) |      | 2,551  |   |      | (2,110 | )
|Prepaid expenses and other current assets       |  |      | (24    | ) |      | 1,726  |   |      | (919   | )
|Trade accounts payable                          |  |      | (1,355 | ) |      | (2,406 | ) |      | 2,572  |  
|Accrued taxes other than income taxes           |  |      | 65     |   |      | 577    |   |      | 11     |  
|Deferred revenues and other accrued liabilities |  |      | 2,870  |   |      | 367    |   |      | 1,474  |  
|                                                |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  
|                                                |  | $    | 1,341  |   |      | 4,452  |   |      | 1,247  |  
|                                                |  |      |        |   |      |        |   |      |        |  



75



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 17  Supplemental Cash Flows
Disclosures (cont.)



Cash flows provided by other operating activities included an increase in deferred long-term mineral
lease bonus revenue of $495,000 in 2007, $2,364,000 in 2006, and $1,258,000 in 2005. Also included in other operating cash flows for 2005 was $3,830,000 in cash proceeds from property condemnation proceedings. (For additional information regarding
the 2005 property condemnation, see Note 21  Commitments and Contingencies.)

Note 18  Earnings per Share

The amounts used in computing earnings per share and the effect on income and weighted average number of shares outstanding of dilutive potential common
stock consisted of the following:



|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |        |      |       
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | ------ | ---- | ------
|(Thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)                                                           |  | 2007 |        | 2006 |        | 2005
|Net income                                                                                                 |  | $    | 11,111 |      | 11,323 |      | 14,518
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |        |      |       
|Weighted average number of common shares used in basic EPS                                                 |  |      | 12,473 |      | 12,398 |      | 12,260
|Effect of dilutive stock awards                                                                            |  |      | 77     |      | 79     |      | 97    
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |        |      |       
|Weighted average number of common shares and dilutive potential common stock used in EPS assuming dilution |  |      | 12,550 |      | 12,477 |      | 12,357
|                                                                                                           |  |      |        |      |        |      |       
|Earnings per common share                                                                                  |  |      |        |      |        |      |       
|Basic                                                                                                      |  | $    | .89    |      | .91    |      | 1.18  
|Assuming dilution                                                                                          |  | $    | .89    |      | .89    |      | 1.17  

Note 19  Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108

As discussed in Note 1  Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements, the SEC released SAB 108 in September 2006. After the issuance of SAB 108, the
Company began a review of all accounting practices. Historically, the Company had accumulated and quantified misstatements under the roll-over method. This method focused primarily on the impact of any misstatement, including the
reversal of prior-year misstatements, on the current-year consolidated income statement. As directed under SAB 108, the Company must now evaluate misstatements under a dual approach method, which also required quantification under the
iron curtain method. The iron curtain method requires the Company to quantify the effect of correcting the period-end balance sheet.

The transition provisions of SAB 108 permit the Company to adjust for the cumulative effect on retained earnings of accumulated misstatements relating to prior years. SAB 108 also requires the adjustment of any prior
quarterly financial statements within the fiscal year of adoption for the effects of such errors on the quarters when the information is next presented. Such adjustments do not require previously filed reports with the SEC to be amended. Effective
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, the Company adopted SAB 108. In accordance with SAB 108, the Company has adjusted beginning retained earnings for fiscal 2006 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for the items
described below. The Company considers these adjustments to be immaterial to prior period income statements.

Prior to SAB 108, the Company
only capitalized interest for qualifying assets constructed or otherwise produced for which interest on directly associated debt was incurred. Capitalized interest was then added to the cost of the underlying assets and was



76



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 19  Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 108 (cont.)



amortized accordingly. Potential uncapitalized interest and any amortization expense in any one year were deemed immaterial by management.

In reaching that determination, the following quantitative measures were considered:



|          |  |                                  |           |   |                           |             |   |                                     |      |  
|--------- |  | -------------------------------- | --------- | - | ------------------------- | ----------- | - | ----------------------------------- | ---- | -
|Year      |  | Net After-TaxEffectof Adjustment |           |   | ReportedNet Income/(Loss) |             |   | Percent ofReportedNet Income/(Loss) |     
|2005      |  | $                                | 28,000    |   |                           | 14,518,000  |   |                                     | 0.19 | %
|2004      |  |                                  | 158,000   |   |                           | 11,093,000  |   |                                     | 1.42 | %
|2003      |  |                                  | (93,000   | ) |                           | 8,194,000   |   |                                     | 1.14 | %
|2002      |  |                                  | 463,000   |   |                           | (13,881,000 | ) |                                     | 3.34 | %
|1997-2001 |  |                                  | 1,211,000 |   |                           | 59,505,000  |   |                                     | 2.04 | %

The application of SAB 108s dual approach regarding capitalized interest resulted in a
cumulative effect on the balance sheet that was deemed to be material. The effect of the Companys historical practices resulted in the Company under reporting capitalized interest of $7,901,000 and under reporting cost of sales of $4,993,000.
The cumulative effect resulted in an increase in the Companys investment in real estate held for development and sale in the amount of $2,908,000, an increase in deferred income taxes payable amounting to $1,141,000, and an increase in
retained earnings of $1,767,000 at January 1, 2006, on the accompanying 2006 consolidated balance sheet. The effect on the Companys 2006 consolidated statement of income was capitalized interest of $1,184,000 and an increase to cost of
sales of $264,000.

During the review process for applying SAB 108, the Company identified some misstatements to the prior years
financial statements. Even though these misstatements were immaterial under the dual approach method, the Company chose to include them in its SAB 108 adjustment to the January 1, 2006, balance sheet for accuracy. These immaterial misstatements
are listed below.

The Companys accounting policy for amortizing deferred charges was not consistent with GAAP. The cumulative effect
for correcting the amortization policy was an increase in deferred charges of $103,000, an increase in deferred income taxes payable amounting to $40,000, and an increase in retained earnings of $63,000 at January 1, 2006, on the accompanying
2006 consolidated balance sheet.

The Companys accounting policies for accruing certain of its other accrued liabilities were not
consistent with GAAP. The cumulative effect for correcting these policies was an increase in other accrued liabilities of $591,000, a decrease in deferred income taxes payable amounting to $232,000, and a decrease in retained earnings of $359,000 at
January 1, 2006, on the accompanying 2006 consolidated balance sheet.

Note 20  Business Interruption and Involuntary Conversion

On August 9, 2007, the Company experienced a fire in the planer section of its operating facility in Waldo, Arkansas that injured
three individuals and caused operations to temporarily cease. The Company was adequately insured under its workers compensation policy for the personal injury of the three individuals. The Waldo facility became fully operational in late October
2007.

The Company maintains business interruption insurance coverage. The Company received cash business interruption proceeds from its
insurance carrier of $3,352,000. The Company recorded $2,166,000 of direct expenses normally included in cost of sales, and $1,186,000 was recorded as other operating income from business interruption insurance proceeds in the Companys
consolidated statement of income.



77



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 20  Business Interruption
and Involuntary Conversion (cont.)



The Company had adequate property damage insurance coverage to enable it to recover the replacement
cost of its property and equipment that was destroyed by the fire. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company received cash proceeds of $2,475,000 for property damage, including $484,000 for contents and repair cost, and $1,991,000 for
replacement cost of a new planer. After a write-off of basis in the amount of $105,000 for the old planer, the Company recognized a gain from the involuntary conversion of assets in the amount of $1,887,000. All of the Companys insurance
proceeds were reinvested to fully restore the Waldo operations.

Note 21  Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments  Commitments for capital expenditures at December 31, 2007, were approximately $600,000 for reforestation
and road construction; $1,400,000 for land acquisitions; $185,000 for property, plant, and equipment; and $3,000,000 for investment in real estate held for development and sale.

Contingencies  The Company has various contingencies related to its investment in Del-Tin Fiber and has either recorded such
contingencies into its financial statements or disclosed the conditions of the contingency as required by SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies, and FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34. (For additional information, see Note 4  Investment in
Del-Tin Fiber.)

On March 28, 2007, the Company and Central Arkansas Water (CAW), a consolidated waterworks, entered into a
full and complete settlement of a pending condemnation litigation involving 680.06 acres of real property located within the watershed of Lake Maumelle in western Pulaski County, Arkansas. Approximately 640 acres were part of the Companys
planned real estate development, The Ridges at Nowlin Creek. The Company will continue to assess the viability of proceeding with the remaining part of its The Ridges of Nowlin Creek planned development. Under the terms of the settlement, CAW has
paid the Company $8,175,000 (approximately $12,021 per acre) for the land, and granted the Company a 90-year option to repurchase the land for the same amount should CAW determine the land is not needed for watershed protection or if it ceases to
use the land for such purpose. During the three months ended March 31, 2007, the Company recorded sales revenues of $8,175,000 and related costs of $675,000 for a net operating gain of $7,500,000 on this transaction.

The Company is also involved in other litigation incidental to its business from time to time. Currently, there are no material other legal proceedings
outstanding.



78



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007



Note 22  Business Segments

The Companys four reporting segments consist of Deltics three operating business units and its corporate function. Each reporting entity has a separate management team and infrastructure that offers
different products and/or services.

Woodlands operations manage the Companys Southern Pine timberlands located primarily in Arkansas
and northern Louisiana and derive revenue from the harvest of timber from the timberlands in accordance with its harvest plans, and either sells timber to third parties in the domestic market or to the Companys Mills segment for conversion
into lumber. In addition, this segment may, from time to time, identify and sell a portion of its timberland holdings that is either non-strategic to future timberland management activities or has appreciated, due primarily to location, to a level
that exceeds its value as a timber-growing asset. This segment also generates revenue from the leasing of hunting, oil and gas, and other rights on its timberlands.

The Mills segment consists of Deltics two sawmills which convert timber, purchased from third parties or the Companys Woodlands segment, into lumber. These mills produce a variety of products, including
dimension lumber, boards, timbers, decking, and secondary manufacturing products, such as finger-jointed studs. These products are sold primarily to wholesale distributors, lumber treaters, and truss manufacturers in the South and Midwest and used
in residential construction, roof trusses and laminated beams.

Real Estate operations, which include real estate developments, add value to
former timberland by developing it into upscale, planned residential and commercial developments. These developments, which are generally centered around a core amenity, are being developed in stages. Historically, real estate sales have consisted
primarily of residential lots sold to builders or individuals, commercial site sales, and sales of undeveloped acreage. In addition, this segment currently leases retail and office space to third parties in a retail center constructed by the
Company, and held for sale, in one of its developments. This segment also manages: (1) a real estate brokerage subsidiary which generates commission revenue by reselling existing homes and (2) a country club operation, Chenal Country Club,
Inc., around which the Companys Chenal Valley development is centered. This club operation derives its revenues from membership services, food and beverage sales, and membership dues.

Corporate operations consist primarily of senior management, accounting, information systems, human resources, purchasing, treasury, income tax, and legal
staff functions that provide support services to the operating business units. The Company currently does not allocate the cost of maintaining these support functions to its operating units.

The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1  Significant Accounting Policies. The Company evaluates
the performance of its segments based on operating income before results of: Del-Tin Fiber, an equity method investee; interest income and expense; other nonoperating income or expense; and income taxes. Intersegment revenues consist primarily of
timber sales from the Woodlands segment to the Mills operations.



79



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 22  Business Segments
(cont.)



Information about the Companys business segments consisted of the following:



|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | ------- | -
|(Thousands of dollars)                                       |  | 2007 |         |   | 2006 |         |   | 2005 |        
|Net sales                                                    |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Woodlands                                                    |  | $    | 39,567  |   |      | 37,667  |   |      | 35,057  |  
|Mills4                                                       |  |      | 79,341  |   |      | 101,879 |   |      | 121,237 |  
|Real Estate                                                  |  |      | 30,252  |   |      | 35,507  |   |      | 33,008  |  
|Eliminations1                                                |  |      | (20,905 | ) |      | (21,941 | ) |      | (20,952 | )
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                                                             |  | $    | 128,255 |   |      | 153,112 |   |      | 168,350 |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Income/(loss) before income taxes                            |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Operating income                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Woodlands                                                    |  | $    | 24,814  |   |      | 22,538  |   |      | 22,421  |  
|Mills4                                                       |  |      | (2,997  | ) |      | (5,340  | ) |      | 6,296   |  
|Real Estate                                                  |  |      | 13,050  |   |      | 13,948  |   |      | 10,697  |  
|Corporate                                                    |  |      | (14,323 | ) |      | (13,099 | ) |      | (12,751 | )
|Eliminations                                                 |  |      | (585    | ) |      | 674     |   |      | (406    | )
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Operating income                                             |  |      | 19,959  |   |      | 18,721  |   |      | 26,257  |  
|Equity in Del-Tin Fiber                                      |  |      | 1,679   |   |      | 2,872   |   |      | (13     | )
|Interest income                                              |  |      | 823     |   |      | 452     |   |      | 198     |  
|Interest and other debt expense                              |  |      | (4,369  | ) |      | (4,231  | ) |      | (5,758  | )
|Other income                                                 |  |      | 345     |   |      | 290     |   |      | 32      |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                                                             |  | $    | 18,437  |   |      | 18,104  |   |      | 20,716  |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Total assets at year-end                                     |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Woodlands                                                    |  | $    | 206,280 |   |      | 208,086 |   |      | 210,905 |  
|Mills                                                        |  |      | 45,472  |   |      | 43,879  |   |      | 45,918  |  
|Real Estate                                                  |  |      | 49,604  |   |      | 47,496  |   |      | 42,150  |  
|Corporate2, 3                                                |  |      | 27,388  |   |      | 24,805  |   |      | 17,354  |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                                                             |  | $    | 328,744 |   |      | 324,266 |   |      | 316,327 |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Depreciation, amortization, and cost of fee timber harvested |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Woodlands                                                    |  | $    | 6,212   |   |      | 6,362   |   |      | 4,913   |  
|Mills                                                        |  |      | 7,433   |   |      | 6,832   |   |      | 5,818   |  
|Real Estate                                                  |  |      | 582     |   |      | 573     |   |      | 575     |  
|Corporate                                                    |  |      | 105     |   |      | 7       |   |      | 173     |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                                                             |  | $    | 14,332  |   |      | 13,774  |   |      | 11,479  |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Capital expenditures                                         |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|Woodlands                                                    |  | $    | 4,978   |   |      | 3,333   |   |      | 7,062   |  
|Mills                                                        |  |      | 5,345   |   |      | 8,763   |   |      | 10,732  |  
|Real Estate                                                  |  |      | 10,171  |   |      | 15,612  |   |      | 15,379  |  
|Corporate                                                    |  |      | 74      |   |      | 59      |   |      | 74      |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  
|                                                             |  | $    | 20,568  |   |      | 27,767  |   |      | 33,247  |  
|                                                             |  |      |         |   |      |         |   |      |         |  



|1 | Primarily intersegment sales of timber from Woodlands to Mills.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

|2 | Includes investment in Del-Tin Fiber, an equity method investee, of $7,017,000, $5,250,000, and $4,186,000 at
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively. (For additional information, see Note 4  Investment in Del-Tin Fiber.)
|- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3 | Includes balance of timberland sale proceeds held by trustee of $805,000 as of December 31, 2007, $111,000 as of
December 31, 2006, and zero in 2005.
|- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|4 | During 2007, the Company experienced a fire in the planer section of its Waldo Mill that affected the operating results.
(For further information, see Note 20  Business Interruption and Involuntary Conversion.)
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



80



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 23  Financial Results by
Quarter (Unaudited)



(Thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)



|                              |  |               |        |                |        |               |        |                |        |   |      |        
|----------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------ | -------------- | ------ | ------------- | ------ | -------------- | ------ | - | ---- | -------
|                              |  | 2007         
|                              |  | FirstQuarter2 |        | SecondQuarter  |        | ThirdQuarter3 |        | FourthQuarter3 |        |   | Year
|Net sales                     |  | $             | 40,377 |                | 37,905 |               | 25,528 |                | 24,445 |   |      | 128,255
|Gross profit                  |  |               | 15,390 |                | 8,875  |               | 3,935  |                | 4,065  |   |      | 32,265 
|Operating income              |  |               | 11,683 |                | 4,315  |               | 766    |                | 3,195  |   |      | 19,959 
|Net income                    |  |               | 6,649  |                | 2,538  |               | 245    |                | 1,679  |   |      | 11,111 
|Earnings per common share     |  |               |        |                |        |               |        |                |        |   |      |        
|Basic                         |  | $             | .53    |                | .20    |               | .02    |                | .13    |   |      | .89    
|Assuming dilution             |  | $             | .53    |                | .20    |               | .02    |                | .13    |   |      | .89    
|Dividends per common share    |  | $             | .075   |                | .075   |               | .075   |                | .075   |   |      | .300   
|Market price per common share |  |               |        |                |        |               |        |                |        |   |      |        
|High                          |  | $             | 56.60  |                | 57.87  |               | 62.83  |                | 59.83  |   |      | 62.83  
|Low                           |  |               | 46.15  |                | 47.03  |               | 50.91  |                | 45.46  |   |      | 45.46  
|Close, at period-end          |  |               | 47.96  |                | 54.82  |               | 56.92  |                | 51.49  |   |      | 51.49  
|                              | 
|                              |  | 2006         
|                              |  | FirstQuarter1 |        | SecondQuarter1 |        | ThirdQuarter1 |        | FourthQuarter  |        |   | Year
|Net sales                     |  | $             | 41,246 |                | 41,410 |               | 43,698 |                | 26,758 |   |      | 153,112
|Gross profit                  |  |               | 11,080 |                | 9,103  |               | 12,318 |                | 394    |   |      | 32,895 
|Operating income              |  |               | 7,261  |                | 5,005  |               | 9,030  |                | (2,575 | ) |      | 18,721 
|Net income/(loss)             |  |               | 3,968  |                | 2,984  |               | 6,389  |                | (2,018 | ) |      | 11,323 
|Earnings per common share     |  |               |        |                |        |               |        |                |        |   |      |        
|Basic                         |  | $             | .32    |                | .24    |               | .52    |                | (.16   | ) |      | .91    
|Assuming dilution             |  | $             | .32    |                | .24    |               | .51    |                | (.16   | ) |      | .89    
|Dividends per common share    |  | $             | .075   |                | .075   |               | .075   |                | .075   |   |      | .300   
|Market price per common share |  |               |        |                |        |               |        |                |        |   |      |        
|High                          |  | $             | 60.60  |                | 60.99  |               | 56.87  |                | 56.28  |   |      | 60.99  
|Low                           |  |               | 50.01  |                | 51.99  |               | 45.20  |                | 47.02  |   |      | 45.20  
|Close, at period-end          |  |               | 60.60  |                | 56.37  |               | 47.66  |                | 55.78  |   |      | 55.78  



|1 | Adjusted to reflect the application of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108,
Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statements. (For additional information, see Note 19  Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108.)
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2 | First quarter results reflect the settlement of the litigation with Central Arkansas Water. (For additional information,
see Note 21  Commitments and Contingencies.)
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|3 | Third and fourth quarter results reflect the impact of the planer fire at Waldo. (For additional Information, see Note
20  Business Interruption and Involuntary Conversion.)
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



81



---

##### Table of Contents

DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION

AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2007

Note 23  Financial Results by
Quarter (Unaudited) (cont.)



(Thousands of dollars, except per share amounts)



|                              |  |              |        |               |        |              |        |               |        |      |        
|----------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------ | ------------- | ------ | ------------ | ------ | ------------- | ------ | ---- | -------
|                              |  | 2005        
|                              |  | FirstQuarter |        | SecondQuarter |        | ThirdQuarter |        | FourthQuarter |        | Year
|Net sales                     |  | $            | 39,435 |               | 45,980 |              | 36,827 |               | 46,108 |      | 168,350
|Gross profit                  |  |              | 9,656  |               | 13,203 |              | 7,974  |               | 9,138  |      | 39,971 
|Operating income              |  |              | 6,332  |               | 10,096 |              | 4,610  |               | 5,218  |      | 26,257 
|Net income                    |  |              | 2,547  |               | 6,373  |              | 3,238  |               | 2,360  |      | 14,518 
|Earnings per common share     |  |              |        |               |        |              |        |               |        |      |        
|Basic                         |  | $            | .21    |               | .52    |              | .26    |               | .19    |      | 1.18   
|Assuming dilution             |  | $            | .21    |               | .52    |              | .26    |               | .19    |      | 1.17   
|Dividends per common share    |  | $            | .0625  |               | .0625  |              | .0750  |               | .0750  |      | .2750  
|Market price per common share |  |              |        |               |        |              |        |               |        |      |        
|High                          |  | $            | 45.90  |               | 39.80  |              | 46.05  |               | 52.04  |      | 52.04  
|Low                           |  |              | 39.10  |               | 35.39  |              | 37.61  |               | 43.61  |      | 35.39  
|Close, at period-end          |  |              | 39.10  |               | 38.03  |              | 46.05  |               | 51.86  |      | 51.86  



82



---

##### Table of Contents

MANAGEMENTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Shareholders

Deltic Timber Corporation:

The management of Deltic Timber Corporation has prepared and is responsible for the Companys consolidated financial statements. The statements are prepared in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, appropriate in the circumstances. In preparing the financial statements, management has, when necessary, made judgments and estimates with consideration given
to materiality.

The Companys consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, who
have expressed their opinion with respect to the fairness of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Their audit was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the Audit Committee) appoints the independent auditors; ratification of the appointment is solicited annually from the shareholders.

The Audit Committee is composed of directors who are not officers or employees of the Company and who have been determined by the Companys Board of Directors to
meet applicable independence standards under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Audit Committee meets periodically with KPMG LLP, the Companys internal auditor, and representatives of management to review the Companys internal
controls, the quality of its financial reporting, the scope and results of audits, and the independence of the external auditors. The Companys internal auditor and KPMG LLP have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee, without
managements presence, to discuss audit findings and other financial matters.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                           
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Ray C. Dillon                     |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth D. Mann                       
|                                      |  | 
|Ray C. Dillon                         |  |  |  | Kenneth D. Mann                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 6, 2008                         |  |  |  | March 6, 2008                             



83



---

##### Table of Contents

MANAGEMENTS REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Shareholders

Deltic Timber Corporation:

The management of Deltic Timber Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, and for performing an
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Companys system of internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and the receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors
of the Company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Deltics management performed an assessment of the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based upon criteria in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment, management determined that
the Companys internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007, based on the criteria in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by COSO.



|                                      |  |  |  |                                           
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Ray C. Dillon                     |  |  |  | /s/ Kenneth D. Mann                       
|Ray C. Dillon                         |  |  |  | Kenneth D. Mann                           
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|March 6, 2008                         |  |  |  | March 6, 2008                             



84



---

##### Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Deltic Timber Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Deltic Timber Corporation and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2007 and
2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes. Also as
discussed in Note 1, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No.123(R), Share-Based Payment, and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in the Current Year Financial Statementsand, effective December 31, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 158, Employers
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plansan amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).

We
also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria
established in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 6, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness
of the Companys internal control over financial reporting.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP         
|                     
|KPMG LLP             
|Shreveport, Louisiana
|March 6, 2008        



85



---

##### Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Deltic Timber Corporation:

We have audited Deltic Timber Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the
maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and
(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Deltic Timber Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based
on criteria established in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Deltic Timber Corporation and Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007, and our report dated
March 6, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP         
|                     
|KPMG LLP             
|Shreveport, Louisiana
|March 6, 2008        



86



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
|------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

None



|Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures
|-------- | -----------------------

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures

Deltic Timber Corporation (Deltic or the Company) has established disclosure controls and
procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to the officers who certify the Companys financial reports and to other members of senior management and the Board
of Directors.

Based on their evaluation as of December 31, 2007, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the
Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms.

Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Companys management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with
the participation of management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, Deltic conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on evaluation under the framework in Internal Control  Integrated Framework, management concluded that
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2007.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Deltics management, with the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, have evaluated any changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth quarter in the case of an annual report), and have concluded that there was no change to Deltics internal
control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Deltics internal control over financial reporting.



|Item 9B. | Other Information
|-------- | -----------------

None.



87



---

##### Table of Contents

PART III



|Item 10. | Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
|-------- | --------------------------------------------------

The sections entitled Nominees For Election as Directors, Directors Whose Term of Office Continue, and Committees of the Board of Directors appearing in the Registrants proxy statement for the
annual meeting of shareholders to be held on April 24, 2008, sets forth certain information with respect to the directors of the registrant, including directors who serve on the Companys Audit Committee and who have been designated an
Audit Committee financial expert, and is incorporated herein by reference. Certain information with respect to persons who are or may be deemed to be executive officers of the Registrant is set forth under the caption Executive Officers of the
Registrant in Part I of this report.

The sections entitled Procedures for Stockholder Nominations and Proposals and
Corporate Governance appearing in the Registrants proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held April 24, 2008 sets forth certain information respectively in regards to applicable procedures for
stockholders to submit director nominations and proposals and the Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and is incorporated herein by reference.



|Item 11. | Executive Compensation
|-------- | ----------------------

Information required by
this Item will be contained in the Registrants proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on April 24, 2008, to be filed not later than 120 days following the end of the Registrants fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, which will set forth certain information with respect to executive compensation of the Registrant and is incorporated herein by reference.



88



---

##### Table of Contents

|Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Information required by this Item will be contained in the Registrants proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on
April 24, 2008, to be filed not later than 120 days following the end of the Registrants fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, which will set forth certain information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners
and management of the Registrant and is incorporated herein by reference.

The following table sets forth information as of
December 31, 2007, with respect to Deltic common stock issuable under the Companys compensation plans.



|                                                           |  |                                                                                            |  |                                                                                 |       |                                                                                                                                     |          
|---------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------
|Plan Category                                              |  | Number ofsecurities tobe issued uponexercise ofoutstanding options,warrants, or
rights(a.) |  | Weightedaverageexercise priceof all outstandingoptions,warrants, or rights,(b.) |       | Number of securitiesremaining available forfuture issuance underequity compensationplans
[excludingsecurities included in (a.)](c.)
|Equity compensation plans approved by security holders     |  | 249,812                                                                                    |  | $                                                                               | 37.06 |                                                                                                                                     | 1,282,848
|Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders |  |                                                                                           |  |                                                                                 |      |                                                                                                                                     |         
|                                                           |  |                                                                                            |  |                                                                                 |       |                                                                                                                                     |          
|                                                           |  | 249,812                                                                                    |  | $                                                                               | 37.06 |                                                                                                                                     | 1,282,848
|                                                           |  |                                                                                            |  |                                                                                 |       |                                                                                                                                     |          



|Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------

Information required by this Item will be contained in the Registrants proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders to be held on April 24, 2008, to be filed not later than 120 days following the end of the
Registrants fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, which will set forth certain information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions of the Registrant and is incorporated herein by reference.



|Item 14. | Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|-------- | --------------------------------------

Information
required by this Item will be contained in the Registrants proxy statement for the annual meeting to be held on April 24, 2008, to be filed not later than 120 days following the end of the Registrants fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007, which will set forth certain information with respect to principal accountant fees and services and is incorporated herein by reference.



89



---

##### Table of Contents

PART IV



|Item 15. | Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|-------- | ------------------------------------------



| | a. | Financial Statements, Schedules and Exhibits.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------



| | 1. | Consolidated Financial Statements.
| | -- | ----------------------------------

Consolidated Balance
Sheets - December 31, 2007 and 2006.

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, including Consolidated Quarterly Income Information (unaudited).

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Consolidated Financial Statements.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.



| | 2. | Financial Statement Schedules.
| | -- | ------------------------------

Other Financial statement
schedules are omitted because either they are not applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.



| | 3. | Exhibits.
| | -- | ---------



|    |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|3   |  | Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|    | 
|3.1 |  | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Deltic Timber Corporation as of December 17, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996).                                                                                                                                              
|    | 
|3.2 |  | Amended and Restated Bylaws of Deltic Timber Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996).                                                                                                                                                                                            
|    | 
|4   |  | Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|    | 
|4.1 |  | Rights Agreement dated as of December 11, 1996, between Deltic Timber Corporation and Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996, and subsequently amended with Amendment No. 1 dated October 15, 1998, and Amendment No. 2 dated October 19, 2006).



90



---

##### Table of Contents

|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|----- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      | 
|10    |  | Material contracts.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.1  |  | Deltic Timber Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (to the Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006).                                                                                                                             
|      | 
|10.2  |  | Distribution Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996).                                                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.3  |  | Tax Sharing Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996).                                                                                                                       
|      | 
|10.4  |  | Credit facility dated December 19, 1996 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
1997).                                                                                              
|      | 
|10.5  |  | Certificate of Designation of the Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, 7.54% Series ($.01 Par Value), of Deltic Timber Corporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997).        
|      | 
|10.6  |  | Fiber Supply Agreement dated February 21, 1995, with Del-Tin Fiber L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Registration of Securities Report on Form
10).                                                                                      
|      | 
|10.7  |  | Note Purchase Agreement dated December 18, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1998).                                                                                             
|      | 
|10.8  |  | Selective Sections of Del-Tin Fiber L.L.C.s Project Credit Agreement dated November 23, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998).                                               
|      | 
|10.9  |  | Revolving Credit Agreement dated June 20, 2001 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2001.)                                                                                            
|      | 
|10.10 |  | Note Purchase Agreement dated December 20, 2002, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002).                                                                                           
|      | 
|10.11 |  | First Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement dated September 30, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003).                                                      
|      | 
|10.12 |  | Guarantee Agreement between Deltic Timber Corporation and SunTrust Bank related to the Del-Tin Fiber Credit Agreement dated August 26, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to
Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004).
|      | 
|10.13 |  | Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006).                                                                                                                       
|      | 
|10.14 |  | Non Qualified Stock Option Form (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006).                                                                                                                          
|      | 
|10.15 |  | Restricted Stock Award Agreement and Stock Power (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006).                                                                                                         



91



---

##### Table of Contents

|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|----- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|      | 
|10.16 |  | Performance Based Restricted Stock Award Agreement and Stock Power (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18,
2006).                                                       
|      | 
|10.17 |  | Change-in-Control and Involuntary Severance Agreement with CEO (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18,
2006).                                                           
|      | 
|10.18 |  | Change-in-Control Agreement with CEO Direct Reports (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006).                                                                      
|      | 
|10.19 |  | Revolving Credit Agreement dated September 9, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2005).                                                  
|      | 
|10.20 |  | Deltic Timber Corporation Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 18, 2006).                                                     
|      | 
|10.21 |  | Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement dated March 30, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007).                                        
|      | 
|10.22 |  | First Amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement dated August 7, 2007 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007).                              
|      | 
|21    |  | Subsidiaries of the Registrant, included elsewhere herein.                                                                                                                                                                               
|      | 
|23    |  | Consents of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.                                                                                                                                                                               
|      | 
|23.1  |  | Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm related to reports on financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of Deltic Timber Corporation, included elsewhere
herein.                               
|      | 
|31.1  |  | Chief Executive Officer Certification Required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                         
|      | 
|31.2  |  | Chief Financial Officer Certification Required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                         
|      | 
|32    |  | Certification Required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.                                                                                                                                                                 
|      | 
|99    |  | Form 11-K, Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, covering Thrift Plan of Deltic Timber Corporation. To be filed as an amendment of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, not
later than 180 days after December 31, 2007.

Exhibits other than those listed above have been omitted since they either are not required or
are not applicable.



92



---

##### Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



|                          |  |                          |  |  |  |  |  |                    
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  | -------------------
|DELTIC TIMBER CORPORATION |  |                          |  | 
|                          |  |                          |  | 
|By:                       |  | /s/ Ray C. Dillon        |  |  |  |  |  | Date: March 6, 2008
|                          |  | Ray C. Dillon, President |  |  |  |  |  |                    

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below on
March 6, 2008 by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated.



|                                       |  |  |  |                                   
|-------------------------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------
|                                       |  | 
|/s/ Robert C. Nolan                    |  |  |  | /s/ Ray C. Dillon                 
|Robert C. Nolan, Chairman and Director |  |  |  | Ray C. Dillon, President and Chief
|                                       |  |  |  | Executive Officer and Director    
|                                       |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)     
|                                       |  | 
|/s/ Randolph C. Coley                  |  |  |  | /s/ O.H. Darling, Jr.             
|Randolph C. Coley, Director            |  |  |  | O. H. Darling, Jr., Director      
|                                       |  | 
|/s/ Christoph Keller, III              |  |  |  | /s/ David L. Lemmon               
|Christoph Keller, III, Director        |  |  |  | David L. Lemmon, Director         
|                                       |  | 
|/s/ R. Madison Murphy                  |  |  |  | /s/ R. Hunter Pierson, Jr.        
|R. Madison Murphy, Director            |  |  |  | R. Hunter Pierson, Jr., Director  
|                                       |  | 
|/s/ J. Thurston Roach                  |  |  |  | /s/ Robert B. Tudor               
|J. Thurston Roach, Director            |  |  |  | Robert B. Tudor, Director         
|                                       |  | 
|/s/ Kenneth D. Mann                    |  |  |  | /s/ Byrom L. Walker               
|Kenneth D. Mann, Vice President,       |  |  |  | Byrom L. Walker, Controller       
|Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer  |  |  |  | (Principal Accounting Officer)    
|(Principal Financial Officer)          |  |  |  |                                   



93