alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BAIRD *vs.*DUNNING.

ERROR TO CXRCUIT COURT, DODGE COUNTY.

Heard January 13.]

[Decided May *4,*1860.

*Trespass*— Negligence.

An action for wilfuly and maliciously driving against the wagon of tlie plaintiff whereby he was injured, *&o.}*is not sustained by proof that the act of the defendant arose from the fractious and unmanageable disposition of his horses, and in spite of the defendant's efforts to restrain them.

The facts in this case will sufficiently appear in the opinion < of the court.

Collins, *Atwood^*& *Haskell,*for the plaintiff in error.

*69*By the Court,*

Paine, J.

The complaint in this case was for wilfully and maliciously driving against the wagon in which the plaintiff was, whereby he was injured.' There was a motion for a nonsuit, and also for a new trial, for the reason among others, that the verdict was not supported by the evidence. The judge properly instructed the jury that there could be no recovery under this complaint, except for a wilful and wrongful act. But that being so, we think that he erred in overruling the motion for a nonsuit, and for a new trial. The bill of exceptions contains all the evidence, and we see nothing to show a wilful injury. On the contrary, it seems clear from the whole of it, that the injury arose from the un-managebleness of the defendant’s horses. He testified that the noise of the one horse wagon behind him, made his horses “fractious,” and act “bad,” and the plaintiff testified that the defendant stopped arid “motioned” them to pass him, and that when they went by, he noticed that the “ off horse” of the defendant was “acting fractious,” This all corroborates the testimony of the defendant, and there is nothing to contradict it, that his horses became unmanageable, and ran against his will and in spite of his efforts to restrain them, upon the one horse wagon.

Whether the defendant was guilty of negligence or unskil-fulness in managing his hoises, or whether the plaintiff or those in the one horse wagon were guilty of negligence in stopping in the middle of the road, when notified that defendant’s horses were coming at a furious rate, it was immaterial to determine in this action, which was not brought for a negligent, but for a wilful injury. There was no evidence to support the verdict. The judgment is reversed with costs, and thé cause remanded for a new trial.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,167
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,167
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,167)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (6,167)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,167)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00


</TABLE>
---

---

EXHIBIT 15

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

On Track Innovations Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-111770, No. 333-115953, No.
333-121316, No. 333-127615, No. 333-130324, No. 333-135742 and No. 333-142320) and in the
registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-116429, No. 333-128106, No. 333-140786
No. 333-149034 and No. 333-149575,) of On Track Innovations Ltd. of our report dated March
31, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of On Track Innovations Ltd. and
its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007 and 2006 and the related consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of
the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, which report appears in
the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 20-F of On Track Innovations Ltd.

Our report refers to a change
effective January 1, 2006, in the method of accounting for stock-based compensation upon
the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based Payment.

/s/ Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel Aviv, Israel
March 31, 2008



---

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

RYAN MCKENZIE

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 2681

[ November 1, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Barbara McCarthy

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 11

- 8888 CF10A

.

Ryan McKenzie, Florida City, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 32.2

 

SOHU.COM INC. 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek Palaschuk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toU.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2003 and results ofoperations of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, 2003. 

 

/s/ Derek Palaschuk

 

Derek Palaschuk, Senior Vice 

President and Chief Financial Officer 

 

August 12, 2003
Exhibit 32.1

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the
undersigned officers of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:

(1) the accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated for the periods presented therein.

Date: April 24, 2009



/s/ Richard K. WilliamsRichard K. WilliamsChief Executive Officer


Date: April 24, 2009



/s/ Brian R. McDonaldBrian R. McDonaldChief Financial Officer


A signed original of the above certification has been provided to Advanced Analogic
Technologies Incorporated and will be retained by Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: JIMMY LEE SWEED,

Relator. '

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 17

- 00051

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The court has considered this cause on the Relator = s petition for writ of mandamus against

the Honorable Gonzalo Garcia , Judge of the 210th District Court of El Paso , Texas, and concludes

that Relator = s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. We therefore deny the petition for

writ of mandamus, in accordance with the opinion of this court.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 1 4 TH DAY OF MARCH , 2017

.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with 58

QPM#

AIR-ANM-D30-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

FDMSDocket No. FAA.JPIf!-- 0"76,/

With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.lg., ATA, RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

,

Orgapization Person !contacted Date

Boeing John Hamilton I

10/14/08

ATA Mark Lopez I

1l/23/09

I

,

UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check the Master List to Verify That This is the Correct Revision Before Use
# C_2016089EN.01000201.xml

| 5.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7938 — Catterton/L Companies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 89/03)

On 1 March 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7938. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7938. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Back
      to Table of
      Contents


**Exhibit
      23.1**








**CONSENT
      OF
      INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**








We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.’s
      333-87944, 333-27973 and 333-128959 of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc.
      on
      Form S-8 of our report dated August 23, 2007, relating to the consolidated
      financial statements of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc, appearing in this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. for the
      year
      ended May 31, 2007.





We
      also consent to reference to us under “Item 6.  Selected Consolidated
      Financial and Operating Data” in Form 10-K.





Our
      audits of the
      consolidated financial statements referred to in our aforementioned report
      also
      included the financial statement schedule of Schiff Nutrition International,
      Inc., listed in Item 15.  This financial statement schedule is the
      responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to
      express an opinion based on our audits.  In our opinion, such
      financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
      consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
      material respects the information set forth therein.











***DELOITTE
      & TOUCHE LLP***





Salt
      Lake City,
      Utah


August
      23,
      2007
# C_2015131EN.01000501.xml

| 23.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/5

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2015/C 131/05)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition

EPSO/AST-SC/04/15 — PARLIAMENTARY USHERS (SC 1)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 131 A of 23 April 2015
  .

C 131 A of 23 April 2015

Further information can be found on EPSO’s website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00745-CV

IN RE Tom RETZLAFF

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 23, 2016

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND MOTION FOR EMERGENCY STAY DENIED

On November 15, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

emergency stay. The court has considered Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of 

mandamus and the motion for emergency stay are denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2014-CI-17145, styled E.M. and V.B.M. v. Philip R. Klein, Klein 

Investigations & Consulting, and James W. Landess, pending in the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, 

the Honorable David A. Canales presiding. The order about which Relator complains was signed by the Honorable 

Antonio Arteaga, presiding judge of the 57th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board

          - [Notice-PCLOB-2015-02; Docket No. 2015-0002, Sequence No. 2]

# TIME AND DATE: 

The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 8, 2015, from 10:00 a.m. through 12:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST).

# PLACE: 

                        2100 K Street NW., Washington, DC 20427. Any change in location will be announced on                         *http://www.pclob.gov.*

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board will conduct a public meeting to discuss and vote on the work plan for its review of                               ( print page 16466)    Executive Order 12333—United States intelligence activities. The discussion will allow the Board to refine its plan of action on this issue.                    

*Procedures for public observation:*                         The meeting is open to the public. Pre-registration is not required. Individuals who plan to attend and require special assistance should contact Executive Director Sharon Bradford Franklin at 202-331-2986, at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.                    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Sharon Bradford Franklin, Executive Director, 202-331-1986.

Dated: March 24, 2015.

Lynn Parker Dupree,

Acting General Counsel, Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-07173 Filed 3-25-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6820-B3-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06771]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT

Office of National Drug Control Policy


Designation of County as High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control Policy.

ACTION: Notice of HIDTA designation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy 
designated 1 additional county as a High Intensity Drug Trafficking 
Area (HIDTA) pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 1706. The new county is New Castle 
County, Delaware as part of the Philadelphia/Camden HIDTA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Questions regarding this notice 
should be directed to Michael K. Gottlieb, National HIDTA Program 
Director, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of 
the President, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-4868.
    Submitted: March 19, 2015.

    Dated: January 5, 2015.
Daniel Rader,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-06771 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 a.m.]
 BILLING CODE 3280-F5-P
# C_2016338EN.01000401.xml

| 15.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 September 2016

(2016/C 338/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1218 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4442 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85078 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5343 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0945 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2748 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3420 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4475 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3470 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5022 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4799 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7038 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5440 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5327 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 263,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,0776 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4894 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5000 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 845,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6333 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,396 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,1292 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,140 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7097 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4804 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,0710 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1218

JPY

Japanese yen

115,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4442

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85078

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5343

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0945

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2748

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3420

RON

Romanian leu

4,4475

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3470

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5022

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4799

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7038

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5440

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5327

KRW

South Korean won

1 263,14

ZAR

South African rand

16,0776

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4894

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5000

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 845,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6333

PHP

Philippine peso

53,396

RUB

Russian rouble

73,1292

THB

Thai baht

39,140

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7097

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4804

INR

Indian rupee

75,0710

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of DDi Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Sally Goff, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.              /s/ SALLY L. GOFF   Sally L. Goff   *Chief Financial Officer*   Date:August 9, 2006