##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F/A

|           |  |                                                                                                                                   
|---------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(Mark One) |  |                                                                                                                                   
|[   ]      |  | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OR (G) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934                                    
|          
|[X]        |  | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2000
|          
|[   ]      |  | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM 
 TO    

Commission file number 0-31481

---

ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Not Applicable
(Translation of Registrants Name into English)

ONTARIO
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

2175 DUNWIN DRIVE, UNIT 6
MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO L5L 1X2 CANADA
(Address of principal executive offices)

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
NONE

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.
COMMON SHARES
(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.
NONE
(Title of Class)

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of
capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual
report.

12,607,719 COMMON SHARES

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
reporting requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]     No [   ]

Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has
elected to follow.

Item 17 [X]     Item 18 [   ]

(Applicable only to Issuers involved in Bankruptcy proceedings during the past
five years) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all
documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities
under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes [   ]     No [   ]





---

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|              |                                                                                        |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|PART I.      
|              | ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS.                        
|              | ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE.                                      
|              | ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION.                                                              
|              | ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY.                                                   
|              | ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS.                                 
|              | ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES.                                   
|              | ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.                            
|              | ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.                                                        
|              | ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING.                                                        
|              | ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.                                                      
|              | ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.                  
|              | ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES.                      
|PART II.     
|              | ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES.                             
|              | ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
|              | ITEM 15. [RESERVED.]                                                                  
|              | ITEM 16. [RESERVED.]                                                                  
|PART III.    
|              | ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.                                                        
|              | ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                                         
|              | ITEM 19. EXHIBITS.                                                                    
|SIGNATURES   
|EXHIBIT 10.11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

|         |  |                                                                              |  |          |    | 
|-------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------- | -- | 
|         |  |                                                                              |  | Page No.
|         |  |                                                                              |  |         
|Part I   |  |                                                                              |  |          | 2  | 
|Item 1.  |  | Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers                        |  |          | 2  | 
|Item 2.  |  | Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable                                      |  |          | 2  | 
|Item 3.  |  | Key Information                                                              |  |          | 2  | 
|Item 4.  |  | Information on the Company                                                   |  |          | 9  | 
|Item 5.  |  | Operating and Financial Review and Prospects                                 |  |          | 20 | 
|Item 6.  |  | Directors, Senior Management and Employees                                   |  |          | 24 | 
|Item 7.  |  | Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions                            |  |          | 29 | 
|Item 8.  |  | Financial Information                                                        |  |          | 32 | 
|Item 9.  |  | The Offer and Listing                                                        |  |          | 32 | 
|Item 10. |  | Additional Information                                                       |  |          | 34 | 
|Item 11. |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk                   |  |          | 40 | 
|Item 12. |  | Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities                       |  |          | 40 | 
|Part II  |  |                                                                              |  |          | 41 | 
|Item 13. |  | Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies                              |  |          | 41 | 
|Item 14. |  | Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders
and Use of Proceeds |  |          | 41 | 
|Item 15. |  | [Reserved.]                                                                  |  |          | 41 | 
|Item 16. |  | [Reserved.]                                                                  |  |          | 41 | 
|Part III |  |                                                                              |  |          | 41 | 
|Item 17. |  | Financial Statements                                                         |  |          | 41 | 
|Item 18. |  | Financial Statements                                                         |  |          | 41 | 
|Item 19. |  | Exhibits                                                                     |  |          | 41 | 

i



---



##### Table of Contents



FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this annual report are
based upon the beliefs of management of Astris Energi Inc. as well as
assumptions made by and information currently available to management, and such
statements may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the U. S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Investors should
note that many factors, some of which are discussed elsewhere in this Report,
could affect the future operations and the future financial results of the
Company and could cause future operations and future financial results to
differ materially from those
expressed in such forward-looking statements.

Page 1



---



##### Table of Contents






PART I.




ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS.

Not Applicable.




ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE.

Not Applicable.




ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION.

A.  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

The following table sets forth, in Canadian dollars, selected historical
information concerning the Company presented in accordance with Canadian GAAP
and is qualified by reference to the consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto. See Item 18. Financial Statements.

|                                    |  |              |            |              |  |              |            |              |  |              |            |   |  |   |           |   |  |   |            |  
|----------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ---------- | ------------ |  | ------------ | ---------- | ------------ |  | ------------ | ---------- | - |  | - | --------- | - |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                    |  | As at        |            | As at        |  | As at        |            | As at        |  | As at       
|                                    |  | December 31, |            | December 31, |  | December 31, |            | December 31, |  | December 31,
|                                    |  | 2000         |            | 1999         |  | 1998         |            | 1997         |  | 1996        
|                                    |  |              |            |              |  |              |            |              |  |             
|                                    |  | RESTATED    
|                                    |  |             
|Revenue                             |  | $            | 22,824     |              |  | $            | 21,919     |              |  | $            | 6,052      |   |  | $ | 5,504     |   |  | $ | 72,468     |  
|Net Loss
from
Continuing
Operations |  |              | (412,228   | )            |  |              | (40,666    | )            |  |              | (138,650   | ) |  |   | (89,568   | ) |  |   | (1,055,819 | )
|Net Loss                            |  |              | (35,580    | )            |  |              | (40,666    | )            |  |              | (138,650   | ) |  |   | (89,568   | ) |  |   | (1,055,819 | )
|Net Loss per
Share                  |  |              | (.003      | )            |  |              | (.004      | )            |  |              | (.013      | ) |  |   | (.011     | ) |  |   | (.162      | )
|Total Assets                        |  |              | 281,705    |              |  |              | 147,662    |              |  |              | 165,379    |   |  |   | 136,550   |   |  |   | 172,136    |  
|Long Term
Obligations               |  |              | 417,287    |              |  |              | 452,491    |              |  |              | 452,491    |   |  |   | 450,491   |   |  |   | 703,948    |  
|Capital
Stock                       |  |              | 1,435,298  |              |  |              | 1,086,676  |              |  |              | 1,086,676  |   |  |   | 1,086,676 |   |  |   | 533,927    |  
|Average Number of
Shares            |  |              | 11,446,010 |              |  |              | 10,643,556 |              |  |              | 10,188,556 |   |  |   | 8,310,000 |   |  |   | 6,500,000  |  
|Cash
Dividends                      |  |              |           |              |  |              |           |              |  |              |           |   |  |   |          |   |  |   |           |  

Page 2



---



##### Table of Contents



Revenue recognition in the consolidated financial statements is not
consistent with U.S. GAAP. Pursuant to Canadian GAAP, an initial payment
of $25,000 that was received in October 1998 under the terms of a ten-year
license
agreement between the Company and Energy Ventures Inc. (Canada), was recognized
over the first year of the agreements term (October 1998 to December 1999).
Under U.S. GAAP, the initial payment received at the beginning of a multi-year
license, not attributable to any specific provision of goods and services, must
be pro-rated over the life of the license. Thus, under U.S. GAAP, the initial
payment of CDN$25,000 would be recognized differently, with an allocation of
CDN$417 to income in 1998, an allocation of CDN$2,500 each year from 1999 to
2006, and a recognition of CDN$2,083 in 2007. See Note 2 on Revenue Recognition
in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

EXCHANGE RATES

The following table sets out the exchange rates, based on the noon buying
rates in New York City for cable transfers in foreign currencies as certified
for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, for the
conversion of Canadian dollars into United States dollars in effect at the end
of the following periods, and the average exchange rates (based on the average
of the exchange rates on the last day of each month in such periods) and the
range of high and low exchange rates for such periods.

|                   |  |                         |     |      |  |      |     |      |  |      |     |  |  |  |     |  |  |  |     | 
|------------------ |  | ----------------------- | --- | ---- |  | ---- | --- | ---- |  | ---- | --- |  |  |  | --- |  |  |  | --- | 
|                   |  | Year ended December 31,
|                   |  |                        
|                   |  | 2000                    |     | 1999 |  | 1998 |     | 1997 |  | 1996
|                   |  |                         |     |      |  |      |     |      |  |     
|End of Period      |  |                         | .67 |      |  |      | .68 |      |  |      | .68 |  |  |  | .72 |  |  |  | .73 | 
|Average for Period |  |                         | .67 |      |  |      | .66 |      |  |      | .71 |  |  |  | .73 |  |  |  | .73 | 
|High for Period    |  |                         | .70 |      |  |      | .69 |      |  |      | .73 |  |  |  | .75 |  |  |  | .75 | 
|Low for Period     |  |                         | .64 |      |  |      | .63 |      |  |      | .68 |  |  |  | .71 |  |  |  | .72 | 

The following table sets out the range of high and low exchange rates,
based on the noon buying rates in New York City for cable transfers in foreign
currencies as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New
York, for the conversion of Canadian dollars into United States dollars for
each of the corresponding months during 2000 and 2001.

|              |  |      |     |     |  |  |     | 
|------------- |  | ---- | --- | --- |  |  | --- | 
|Month         |  | High |     | Low
|              |  |      |     |    
|December 2000 |  |      | .67 |     |  |  | .65 | 
|January 2001  |  |      | .67 |     |  |  | .66 | 
|February 2001 |  |      | .67 |     |  |  | .65 | 
|March 2001    |  |      | .65 |     |  |  | .63 | 

Page 3



---



##### Table of Contents



|                             |  |      |     |     |  |  |     | 
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | --- | --- |  |  | --- | 
|Month                        |  | High |     | Low
|                             |  |      |     |    
|April 2001                   |  |      | .65 |     |  |  | .63 | 
|May 2001                     |  |      | .65 |     |  |  | .64 | 
|June (through
June 12, 2001) |  |      | .66 |     |  |  | .65 | 

On December 29, 2000, the noon rate of exchange, as reported by the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York for the conversion of United States dollars
into Canadian dollars was $1.52 (CDN$1.00 = US$.67). As of June 12, 2001, the
noon rate of exchange, as reported by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York for
the conversion of United States dollars into Canadian dollars was $1.52
(CDN$1.00 = US$.66)

B.  CAPITALIZATION AND INDEBTEDNESS.

Not Applicable.

C.  REASON FOR THE OFFER AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

Not Applicable.

D.  RISK FACTORS.

An investment in the securities of the
Company involves a high degree of
risk. The following risk factors should be considered carefully in evaluating
the Company and its business. If any of the risks described below occurs, the
business, results of operations and financial condition of the Company could be
adversely affected.

HISTORY OF LOSSES SINCE INCEPTION, EXPECTATION OF LOSSES IN THE IMMEDIATE
FUTURE, AND POSSIBILITY THAT THE COMPANY MAY NEVER ACHIEVE OR SUSTAIN
PROFITABILITY. The Company has incurred net losses each year since inception.
The accumulated deficit of the Company was CDN$1,988,453 as of December 31,
2000. It expects to continue to incur net losses at least through fiscal year
2002, and these losses may be substantial. To implement the current business
strategy, the Company will have to incur a high level of fixed operating
expenses and will continue to incur considerable research and development
expenses and capital expenditures. Accordingly, if additional capital, revenues
and positive cash flows cannot be generated, to which no assurance can be
given, the Company will not achieve profitability. Even if profitability is
achieved, it may not be sustained or increased on a quarterly or annual basis.

THE REPORT OF THE COMPANYS INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT STATES THAT THE ABILITY
OF THE COMPANY TO CONTINUE AS A GOING CONCERN IS IN SUBSTANTIAL DOUBT. Whether
the Company continues as a going concern is dependent upon the Companys
ability to raise additional capital, the successful commercialization of one or
more of the Companys research projects and the attainment of profitable
operations. The ability to generate future revenues will depend on a number of
factors, many of which are beyond control of the Company. These factors include
the rate of market acceptance of its fuel cell products, competitive
activities, regulatory developments and general economic trends.

Page 4



---



##### Table of Contents



ABILITY TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL CAPITAL, THEREBY RESULTING IN CURTAILMENT OR
CESSATION OF OPERATIONS. At December 31, 2000, the Company had a negative
working capital of CDN$141,172. The ability of the Company to realize its
objectives depends in large part upon obtaining additional capital. The Company
has a present need for capital in connection with its fuel cell development
activities and transition to commercial operations. The Company believes that
it will require up to CDN$10 million over the next three to five years to
establish a pilot program facility for the manufacture of an aggregate of 2,000
kilowatts per year of alkaline fuel cells in various sizes. There is no
assurance that any additional financing will be available on commercially
attractive terms, in a timely fashion, in sufficient amounts, not substantially
dilutive to shareholders, or at all. If adequate funds are not available, the
Company would have to scale back its operations, including its product
development, manufacturing and marketing activities, all of which could lead
ultimately to cessation of operations.

LACK OF EXPERIENCE IN MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING PRODUCTS. To date, the
Company has derived revenues principally from sales of prototypes or small
ancillary products, contract research and government grants. Sales have been
limited to demonstration and prototype models. The Companys prototypes are
pre-commercial production products assembled on a one-off basis, by hand. The
Company is not yet adequately financed to produce commercial products. The
Company has not produced any prototypes on an automated basis and has not
designed an automated assembly facility. In addition, the Company still has not
been able to determine whether or not its prototypes can be assembled through
automation or whether there is a sufficient level of acceptance of its products
for the Company to sell fuel cells in sufficient volume to become profitable.
The Company does not have the manufacturing experience to handle large
commercial requirements. It would have to rely on third-party manufacturers
until it can develop its own capacity. The Company may not be able to produce
or commercialize any of its products in a cost-effective manner, and, if
produced, it may not be able to successfully market these products. Production
costs of the initial commercial units may be higher than their sales price and
there can be no assurance that higher production levels will occur or that
sales prices will ever exceed production costs.

MARKET ACCEPTANCE OF THE FUEL CELL PRODUCTS MAY TAKE LONGER TO ACHIEVE OR
MAY NEVER BE ACHIEVED. The Companys alkaline fuel cell products represent a
new technology and any success will depend on this technology achieving market
acceptance. Because the Companys products are designed to capitalize on
markets that presently utilize or are serviced by products from traditional and
well-established power generation sources, such as engine-generators, the
Company may face significant resistance from end-users to adopt a new and
alternative power source technology. Fuel cell products for portable and mobile
applications represent an emerging market. The Company does not know whether
its targeted customers will purchase such products.

ABILITY TO MEET PROJECTED DEMAND FOR THE COMPANYS PRODUCTS. Locating and
establishing new manufacturing facilities, if required, will place significant
demands on the Companys managerial, technical, financial and other resources.
The Companys business plan contemplates significant growth in sales and
personnel which may place a strain upon its current management systems and
resources, as well as its ability to obtain capital. As of June 2001, the
Company had fewer than 10 employees. The Companys business plan and
anticipated product sales will require the Company to hire, train and manage

Page 5



---



##### Table of Contents



additional employees and to establish or contract for production capacity. If
the Company is unable to hire the skilled employees it needs or to establish
its production capacity in a timely manner, it might be unable to fulfill
orders for its products or meet its business plans. There can be no assurance
that the Company will be able to effectively manage its anticipated growth.

ABILITY TO COMPETE SUCCESSFULLY IN A HIGHLY COMPETITIVE MARKET.
The development and marketing of fuel cells and fuel cell systems is
extremely competitive. A number of firms throughout the world have established
fuel cell
development programs. The Company competes directly with alternative energy and
entrenched power-generation and power-storage technologies. Competitors range
from development stage companies to major domestic and international companies.
These or other companies may succeed in developing and bringing to market
products or technologies that are more cost-effective than those being
developed by the Company or that would render its products and technology
obsolete or non-competitive in the marketplace. The Companys competitors have
greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater
financial, technical, marketing, public relations, sales, distribution and
other resources than the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company
will be able to compete effectively with such companies. In addition, the
Company expects that additional competition will develop, from both existing
businesses in the energy industry and from new entrants.

DEPENDENCE ON THIRD-PARTY MANUFACTURERS. Until such time as the Company
has adequate capital resources and there is sufficient demand for its products,
the Company will depend on third parties for the manufacture of its products
and for parts necessary to manufacture its products. If manufacturers or
suppliers are unable or unwilling to manufacture or provide the materials and
components to manufacture the Companys products on commercially reasonable
terms, or at all, delays in identifying and contracting for alternative sources
of manufacture or supply would adversely affect the ability to market the
products.

POSSIBLE FAILURE OF FIELD TESTS. The Companys golf car project was
completed in March 2001. The Company has demonstrated the golf car at a golf
club near Toronto, Ontario, and at a major conference on clean transportation
and alternative fuels held at the state capitol in St. Paul, Minnesota. The
Company is currently continuing to field test the golf car product and plans to
conduct additional field tests in the future. Problems and delays could be
encountered during these field tests for a number of reasons, including the
failure of the Companys technology or the technology of third parties, as well
as the failure to maintain and service the prototypes properly. Any problem or
perceived problem with the field tests could materially harm the future
reputation and impair market acceptance of, and demand for, the Companys
products.

THE COMPANY MAY BE FOUND LIABLE TO PAY A LARGE AMOUNT TO A FORMER
DIRECTOR. The Company is currently a defendant in a litigation with a former
director who is seeking in excess of CDN$1,627,301. While the Company is
vigorously defending such action, there can be no assurance that the Company
will be found not liable for such damages. If found liable, there is no
assurance that the Company could pay such an award.

Page 6



---



##### Table of Contents



POSSIBLE LIABILITY FOR INFRINGING THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS OF
OTHERS AND DIFFICULTIES IN PROTECTING THE COMPANYS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Despite the Companys efforts to protect its proprietary rights, unauthorized
parties may attempt to copy aspects of the Companys products and product
designs, or to obtain and use information that the Company regards as
proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of the Companys proprietary technology,
if required, may be difficult, time-consuming and costly. In addition, the laws
of certain countries in which the Companys products may be sold or licensed do
not protect its products and related intellectual property rights to the same
extent as the laws of Canada or the United States. The Company does not believe
that any of its products infringe the proprietary rights of any third parties.
From time to time, however, third parties may contest the Companys rights to
use its intellectual property. Any such claims, with or without merit, could be
time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or
require the Company to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty
or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable
to the Company.

NEED FOR COMPATIBILITY WITH THE PRODUCTS OF THIRD-PARTY MANUFACTURERS OR
POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS. The Companys success will depend in large part upon its
ability to make its products compatible with the products of third-party
manufacturers. The Companys products will be successful only if manufacturers
redesign or modify their existing products to fully incorporate the Companys
products and technologies. The Companys failure to make its products and
technologies compatible with the products of third-party manufacturers or the
failure of potential customers to redesign or make necessary modifications to
their existing products to accommodate the Companys products would
significantly impair or preclude its ability to sell its products.

ACCIDENTS INVOLVING THE FLAMMABLE FUELS USED WITH THE PRODUCTS COULD
IMPAIR THEIR MARKET ACCEPTANCE. The fuel cell products use hydrogen, which is
typically generated from gaseous and liquid fuels, such as propane, natural gas
or methanol in a process known as reforming. While the Companys fuel cell
products do not use these fuels in a combustion process, natural gas, propane
and hydrogen are flammable fuels that could leak into a residence or commercial
location and combust if ignited by another source. Since the Companys products
have not yet gained widespread market acceptance, any accidents involving the
Companys systems or other fuel cell-based products could materially impede
demand for the products. At present, the Company does not carry insurance to
cover such accidents.

THE COMPANYS PRODUCTS MAY FROM TIME TO TIME CONTAIN DESIGN DEFECTS THAT
ARE DIFFICULT TO DETECT AND CORRECT. Although the Company does not know of any
existing design defects, there can be no assurance that defects or flaws will
not be found in new products after commencement of commercial shipments or, if
discovered, that the Company will be able to successfully correct such defects
or flaws in a timely manner or at all. The occurrence of defects or flaws in
the Companys products could result in loss of or delay in market acceptance of
the Companys products, and correcting such defects or flaws could require
significant expenditures by the Company. In addition, the failure of the
Companys products to perform to customer expectations could give rise to
warranty claims.

DEPENDENCE ON ATTRACTING AND RETAINING KEY PERSONNEL. The success of the
Company is largely dependent on the performance of its key employees,

Page 7



---



##### Table of Contents



particularly Jiri K. Nor. Mr. Nor started Astris in 1983 and is the principal
developer of Astris alkaline fuel cell technology. Additionally, the Company
is dependent on a small number of employees who have been with Astris for
numerous years and who actually construct Astris technological components and
are familiar with its proprietary designs. Loss of the services of Mr. Nor or
the failure to attract and retain additional key employees with necessary
skills could have a material adverse impact upon the Companys growth and
profitability. Competition for highly skilled management, technical, research
and development and other employees is intense and the Company may not be able
not currently maintain key person life insurance policies on any of its
employees.

RISKS INHERENT IN INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS INCLUDING CURRENCY EXCHANGE
RATE FLUCTUATIONS AND TARIFF REGULATIONS. A substantial portion of the
Companys revenues is expected to be realized in currencies other than Canadian
dollars. The Companys operating expenses are primarily paid in Canadian
dollars. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and such
other currencies may have a material effect on the Companys results of
operations. In particular, the Company may be adversely affected by a
significant strengthening of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar and
the Czech Republic koruna. In addition, the Company does not intend to enter
into any hedging or other similar agreements or arrangements to protect it
against any of these currency risks. The Company may also be subject to tariff
regulations and requirements for export licenses, particularly with respect to
certain technologies, unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, longer
accounts receivable requirements and collections, difficulties in managing
international operations, potentially adverse tax consequences, restrictions on
repatriation of earnings and the burdens of complying with a wide variety of
foreign laws.

POSSIBLE DIFFICULTIES BY UNITED STATES PERSONS TO EFFECT SERVICE OF
PROCESS WITHIN THE UNITED STATES UPON THE COMPANY OR ITS DIRECTORS OF OFFICERS,
OR TO REALIZE IN THE UNITED STATES UPON JUDGMENTS. The Company is an Ontario
corporation with its principal place of business in Canada. All of its
Directors and Officers are residents of Canada and all of the assets of such
persons and of the Company are located outside the United States. US Persons
should not assume that Canadian courts (i) would enforce judgments of United
States courts obtained in actions against the Company or its Officers and
Directors predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the United States
federal securities laws or the securities or blue sky laws of any state
within the United States or (ii) would enforce, in original actions,
liabilities against the Company or its Officers and Directors predicated upon
the United States federal securities laws or any such state securities or blue
sky laws.

THE COMPANY HAS NEVER PAID DIVIDENDS AND IT DOES NOT ANTICIPATE PAYING
DIVIDENDS IN THE FUTURE. The Company has never declared any cash dividends on
its Common Shares, and if the Company were to become profitable, it would be
expected that all of such earnings would be retained to support the business.
As a result, shareholders must rely on stock appreciation for any return on
their investment in the Common Shares.

VOLATILE AND LIMITED MARKET FOR THE COMPANYS COMMON SHARES. The Companys
Common Shares are not actively traded. The bid and asked prices for the Common
Shares in the pink sheets has fluctuated significantly. In the past two fiscal

Page 8



---



##### Table of Contents



years, the Common Shares traded from a high of US$2.75 to a low of US$0.03 per
share. The Common Shares are not presently publicly traded in Canada. Since
June 20, 2001, the Companys Common Shares have been traded on the O.T.C.
Bulletin Board. Even with the commencement of trading, there can be no
assurance given that that such activity will increase investor recognition.

APPLICATION OF THE SEC PENNY STOCK REGULATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS. The
Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted regulations which generally
define Penny Stocks to be an equity security that has a market price less than
$5.00 per share or an exercise price of less than US$5.00 per share, subject to
certain exemptions based upon minimum assets or revenues. As of June 1, 2001,
the closing bid and asked prices for the Common Shares were US$.79 and US$.85
per share. As a Penny Stock, the Companys Common Shares may become subject to
Rule 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Penny
Stock Rule. This Rule imposes additional sales practice requirements on
broker-dealers that sell such securities to persons other than established
customers and accredited investors (generally, individuals with a net worth
in excess of US$1,000,000 or annual incomes exceeding US$200,000, or US$300,000
together with their spouses). For transactions covered by Rule 15g-9, a
broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the purchaser
and have received the purchasers written consent to the transaction prior to
sale. As a result, this Rule may affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell
the Companys securities and may affect the ability of purchasers to sell any
of the Companys securities in the secondary market.

For any transaction involving a Penny Stock, unless exempt, the Rule
requires delivery, prior to any transaction in a Penny Stock, of a disclosure
schedule prepared by the SEC relating to the Penny Stock market. Disclosure is
also required to be made about sales commissions payable to both the
broker-dealer and the registered representative and current quotations for the
securities. Finally, monthly statements are required to be sent disclosing
recent price information for the Penny Stock held in the account and
information on the limited market in penny stock.




ITEM 4.  INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY.

A.  HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY.

Astris Energi Inc. (AEI or the Company) was incorporated as Kayty
Exploration Ltd. on March 18, 1981, pursuant to the Companies Act of the
Province of Alberta, Canada to engage in oil and gas exploration activities.
The Company subsequently changed its name to Kayty Inc. in August 1987, changed
the place of incorporation to the Province of Ontario, Canada, and effected a
one-for-ten reverse split of its Common Shares. In December 1994, the Company
changed its name to WLD Inc. (WLD) and effected a one-for-three reverse split
of its Common Shares, reducing the outstanding Common Shares to 5,000,000
shares. By 1995, WLD had ceased exploration activities and sought other
business activities. In December 1995, the Company acquired Astris Inc. in
exchange for 1,500,000 Common Shares and warrants for the purchase of 3,500,000
Common Shares, which warrants were subsequently exercised in 1997 at an
exercise price of CDN$0.05 per warrant, and changed its name to Astris Energi
Inc. The purpose of the acquisition was that the Company was seeking a
potentially promising business activity and Astris Inc. was seeking to be part
of a public company which might facilitate the raising of working capital to
further the development of its fuel cell research.

Page 9



---



##### Table of Contents



The Companys principal business office is located at 2175 Dunwin Drive,
Unit 6, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5L 1X2 and its telephone number is (905)
608-2000. The Companys e-mail address is mail@astrisfuelcell.com. The Company
maintains a website at astrisfuelcell.com. The Company is not incorporating by
reference in this Form 20-F the information on its website.

B.  BUSINESS OVERVIEW.

THE COMPANYS PURPOSE

The Companys mission is to develop affordable fuel cells, fuel cell power
generators, and related small products for industrial, commercial, educational,
scientific, transportation and similar applications. The Company intends to
penetrate existing portable and other small generator markets with quiet,
odorless, non-polluting and highly efficient fuel cell generators, which can
compete both technically and economically with traditional energy sources.

DESCRIPTION OF THE COMPANYS BUSINESS ACTIVITIES

The Company has been engaged since 1995 in the design, production and
commercialization of alkaline fuel cell systems for industrial, commercial and
retail markets. Specifically, the Companys main focus has been to develop and
market a one kilowatt alkaline fuel cell (AFC) system which could be used to
power golf cars, in-plant material movers and similar small vehicles. In March
2001, the Company completed an operating golf car powered by an AFC fuel cell
system. The Company successfully demonstrated this AFC system powered golf car
at a golf club located near Toronto, Canada and at a major conference on clean
transportation and alternative fuels held at the state capitol in St. Paul,
Minnesota. The Company plans to continue demonstrating and testing its AFC
system powered golf car project. The Company is currently seeking financing to
expand this golf car program.

In addition, assuming success with the one to four kilowatt fuel cell
project, in the future the Company will also seek to develop and market AFC
systems up to ten or more kilowatts for other uses, such as powering small
vehicles, power supplies in individual homes and emergency, uninteruptible
power supplies for hospital emergency rooms and computers.

DESCRIPTION OF FUEL CELLS

 GENERAL

Fuel cells are electrochemical devices, similar in certain respects to
batteries, that supply electricity for a wide variety of `off-grid
requirements, presently served by gasoline and diesel generators. Fuel cells
generate electricity efficiently and cleanly from the electrochemical reaction
of hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen is typically derived from conventional fuels
such as natural gas or propane, while oxygen is drawn from the air. Fuel cells
enable chemical energy of fuels to be converted directly into electricity,
thereby avoiding the fundamental loss of efficiency and emission of pollutants
associated with the combustion process. In many instances where a generator or
gasoline powered engine is used today, a fuel cell is a potential substitute.
Applications are both mobile and stationary, for all kinds of vehicles and for
homes, commercial buildings, remote sites and for other situations requiring
electricity that are not connected to distributed power supplies. The Company

Page 10



---



##### Table of Contents



intends to focus its efforts initially on developing fuel cells capable of
producing one to four kilowatts.

Fuels cells can be environmentally cleaner and more cost-effective than
power generation sources using fossil fuels. Fuel cells, which produce little
sound and only water as a waste product, offer great advantages over gasoline
generators, as such generators are often responsible for producing large
amounts of air and noise pollution. In addition, fuel cells are nominally at
least two times more energy efficient than current gasoline generators.

There are currently five basic types of fuel cell technologies: Alkaline
(AFCs), Proton Exchange Membrane (PEMs), Phosporic Acid (PAFCs), Molten
Carbonate (MCFCs), and Solid Oxide (SOFCs). In addition to AFCs, the other
fuel cell systems  PEMs, PAFCs, MCFCs and SOFCs are generally all considered
to have viable commercial applications. However, these fuel cells differ in
regard
to cell materials and operating temperature. PAFCs, MCFCs and SOFCs operate at
high temperatures and are used primarily to produce megawatts of power for
utility-type power generation or co-generation. These three types are not
considered competitors of the two smaller fuel cell types, namely AFCs and
PEMs. The Company believes that AFCs and PEMs are the only fuel cells that are
presently of competitive relevance for relatively small power, stationary and
portable applications because AFCs and PEMs operate at ambient temperatures (0
to 100 degrees Celsius) and deliver kilowatts which are more suited to meet the
needs of small, off-grid applications. The Company only deals with AFCs.

While both AFCs and PEM fuel cells have potential environmental and
efficiency advantages over traditional power sources, the Company believes that
AFCs can be manufactured less expensively, operated more efficiently and are
more practical in small-scale applications. See Competition.

It should be noted that fuel cells are still a young technology and many
technical and engineering challenges remain. In the past, attempts to build
fuel cells that could produce electricity continued to fail because of a lack
of understanding of electrode kinetics and the materials used. As a result,
technologies that were better understood and which produced larger quantities
of power, such as the internal combustion engine, gained greater public
acceptance. This public perception and lack of a proven track record of fuel
cells further hampered their development by limiting investment funds for fuel
cell research.

Perhaps the biggest problem with fuel cell production today is that fuel
cells are still very expensive to produce. One key reason for the high cost of
manufacturing fuel cells is that not enough are being made to allow for
economies of scale. The Company believes that fuel cells utilizing its present
technology can be constructed for approximately CDN$700 per kilowatt, with the
per kilowatt cost reduced to approximately CDN$250 per kilowatt upon increasing
the quantity of production. A cost of CDN$250 per kilowatt is competitive with
the cost of devices in the energy field as a whole but is more than the cost of
producing kilowatts for automobile use, i.e. the internal combustion engine
(CDN$50 per kilowatt). As demand for fuel cells increases and research and
development continues the cost of manufacturing should be reduced to make
alkaline fuel cells more competitive with traditional energy sources.

Page 11



---



##### Table of Contents



In addition, while fuel cells can produce energy more efficiently and are
environmentally cleaner than traditional sources of power, other energy sources
are more entrenched in the world economy. For instance, all golf cars currently
being manufactured are designed to be powered from batteries or internal
combustion engines. In order for fuel cells to be used in such products,
manufacturers must make adjustments to their current designs to allow them to
be capable of being powered by fuel cells.

However, due to new government pollution regulations, increased energy
costs and a growing demand for off-grid power supplies, demand for fuel cells
is increasing. The Company believes that this demand will increase as fuel
cells become better known to the public and more cost competitive with other
energy sources.

 ALKALINE FUEL CELLS

An AFC system is an assembly comprised of fuel cell stack(s), which
generate electricity, together with ancillary components which, in an
integrated assembly, constitute a complete, operating fuel cell system.

The Company believes that all principal material developmental issues in
alkaline fuel cell technology have been resolved by both the Company and the
industry at large. However, the Company believes that continued research and
development will allow for improvements in alkaline fuel cell catalysts and
electrode materials which should improve the cost/performance ratio of alkaline
fuel cells to more traditional energy sources.

The ancillary components to the AFC system supply, filter and re-circulate
hydrogen, air and liquid electrolyte to the stack(s), deliver electricity to
the end-use application, remove the aqueous by-product of the fuel cell
operation, and electrically and electronically control, coordinate and
integrate all the functions of the system into a single operating whole.

THE COMPANYS PRODUCTS

The Company presently offers commercial products ranging from
demonstration and educational fuel cells and accessories to scientific products
such as electrochemical test cells to associated electronic and computer based
test equipment  useful in research and development and the testing of
electrodes, fuel cells and batteries, and sub-kilowatt fuel cells and stacks.
For a description of these products, see Small Fuel Cells and Related
Products below.

The Companys principal fuel cell product is a prototype system supplied
in sizes up to four kilowatts of electrical output. These prototypes are
pre-commercial products provided on a one-off basis to individual customers and
assembled by hand to the specification of the customer. Prototypes are in
contrast to pilot production systems which are systems manufactured in a
pilot production facility not on a full commercial basis and to commercial
systems which are manufactured by volume production methods.

The Companys systems of one kilowatt output capacity have been sold in
Canada and in the Czech Republic for test purposes. The largest fuel cell
system sold by the Company was a four kilowatt unit that was purchased by the

Page 12



---



##### Table of Contents



Technical University of Mines, Ostrava, Czech Republic, to conduct research on
the viability of fuel cells to supply electricity in private homes. In August
2000, Astris s.r.o., a subsidiary of the Company, delivered a portable fuel
cell generator to the Czech Ministry of National Defense for testing purposes.

The Companys primary current project is the development and
construction of a one kilowatt AFC system to power a golf car. The Company
believes that this project is the first stage toward the commercialization of
its AFC technology for larger systems, capable of powering forklifts, yachts
and motor homes. This project was budgeted to cost US$250,000 and was completed
in March 2001. See Description of the Companys Business Activities above.

The Company is primarily targeting markets in North America and Europe for
the sale of small stationary and mobile applications including light vehicles
and emergency power supplies.

The Company is also developing a new, larger proprietary electrode that
will be used for fuel cell systems larger than five kilowatts and up to 10
kilowatts or more for use in small vehicles such as forklifts. The Company
anticipates that such a fuel cell will be ready for commercial application
within the next one to five years.

The Company has also completed the initial research in the development of
an advanced fuel cell stack design for systems of up to 25 kilowatts or larger
for use in commercial buildings and automobiles. Such fuel cells will be
developed initially as prototypes and will be later developed as commercial
products.

The Company does not presently have any development, manufacturing, joint
development or marketing agreements in place for the development, construction
and sale of its fuel cells.

In addition to the Companys fuel cell systems, the Company has several
small fuel cells and products for sale through its website.

RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AI has been involved in fuel cell research since its formation in 1983.
More than CDN$12 million has been expended on research activities, which amount
includes approximately CDN$6 million expended by the Institute of Hydrogen
Studies at the University of Toronto, whose rights AI acquired in 1986, funds
from stock placements and funds internally generated. AI had entered into the
1995 acquisition with WLD to be in better position to raise capital for
additional research and development. As sufficient financing was not obtained
as part of the AI acquisition, the research and development activities in
Canada were curtailed. Because labor costs are significantly lower in the Czech
Republic than Canada and the capital needs of Astris s.r.o. for research and
development activities are less than what would have been required in Canada,
the Companys research and development has primarily been carried out through
the Companys 30%-owned subsidiary, Astris s.r.o., in the Czech Republic. In
January 1995, pursuant to a Licence Agreement, AI granted a non-exclusive
licence to Astris s.r.o. for the production and sale of products embodying or
utilizing AIs fuel cell technology. The royalty fee is 2% of the net sale
price of licensed products sold by Astris s.r.o. to third parties. Astris

Page 13



---



##### Table of Contents



s.r.o. is obligated to grant the Company a free worldwide irrevocable licence
on improvements of and additions to the technology made by Astris s.r.o., and
also to assign any patent rights thereto to the Company. The Licence Agreement
is to remain in effect until the expiration of all Company patents related to
the technology, subject to earlier termination upon certain events.

Astris s.r.o. has been engaged in fuel cell research and development since
1992. Its current research and development efforts are primarily focused on
electrode technology to improve the electrochemical efficiency, durability and
economy of alkaline fuel cells. These research and development efforts have
also been focused on methods to reduce production costs, to improve product
quality and consistency and on identifying new features and innovations for
future product development. Expenditures on research and development at Astris
s.r.o. were approximately US$81,000 for 1998 and 1999. For the year ended
December 31, 2000, the Company expended CDN$180,807 on research and
development. The research and development budget for 2001 is contingent upon
the Companys ability to raise capital.

In October 1998, the Company entered into a Licence Agreement and an
Equipment Lease with Energy Ventures Inc. (Canada), a subsidiary of Energy
Ventures Inc., a Delaware corporation (EVI). EVI is a portable power
technology developer and integrator with activities in fuel cell and
rechargeable battery technology. Pursuant to the Licence Agreement, the Company
granted to EVI a nonexclusive worldwide licence to use the Companys technology
relating to alkaline fuel cells in manufacturing, research and development,
marketing and commercial production. The License called for an initial royalty
of CDN$25,000, and a percentage, at a rate of 2.5% for the first four years and
2% during the next six years, of gross sales of EVI products containing the
Companys technology, with a CDN$10,000 a year minimum royalty commencing in
2001.

In February 2001, EVI reported in its Form 10-KSB for September 30, 2000
that it expected to devote minimal resources to the development of the
Companys AFC technology in the near future and would instead concentrate on
the development of its Direct Methanol Fuel Cell technology as it believes that
such technology offered EVI the best market entry prospect. EVI did not pay the
CDN$10,000 minimum royalty due March 31, 2001. The Company and EVI have
tentatively agreed to negotiate a settlement with respect to the non-payment by
EVI of the minimum annual royalty in early July.

The Company also leased certain machinery, equipment and other property
relating to a laboratory operated by the Company to EVI for a period of ten
years at an annual rental of US$45,000. The lease also granted EVI an option to
purchase all the leased assets for CDN$1 after ten years. In 1998, EVI
purchased the leased assets by issuing 200,000 shares of its Common Stock to
the Company valued at $2.25 per share. The EVI Common Stock trades on the
O.T.C. Bulletin Board under the ticker symbol EGYV-L. The Company sold 85,900
of the 200,000 shares of EVI Common Stock between February 28 and April 10,
2000 and received net proceeds of US$250,217. The Company used the net proceeds
to complete the development of the golf car program. In the first quarter of
year 2001, the Company sold its remaining shares of EVI Common Stock for net
proceeds of US$65,957. As part of the EVI Agreements, at the request of EVI,
the Company granted to EVI options to purchase the Companys Common Shares to
give EVI the opportunity to benefit form the possible future success of the
Company in addition to receiving marketing revenues. See Compensation below.

Page 14



---



##### Table of Contents



The Income Tax Act of Canada contains various tax incentives for taxpayers
performing scientific research and experimental development (SR&ED) in
Canada. Specifically, Canadian law permits public companies to receive tax
credits up to 35% of amounts spent on salaries and materials of a current and
of a capital nature carried on in Canada.

Upon filing a claim for SR&ED on Form T661 and acceptance thereof,
Canadian-controlled private corporations would receive the refundable amount in
the form of a cash reimbursement. Other Canadian companies (i.e. public
companies) are not granted a cash refund, but rather are entitled to a tax
credit equal to the non-refundable amount.

For tax year 1995, when the Company was a Canadian-controlled private
corporation named Astris Inc., it submitted a request on Form T661 to the
Canada Custom and Revenue Agency (the CRA) for a refund of CDN$157,720
representing a portion of the research and development expenses for that year.
The CRA initially awarded the Company CDN$39,421. The Company challenged that
determination. This matter has been resolved, and the Company expects to
receive approximately CDN$61,000 plus interest in the third quarter of 2001.

Since going public in Canada in December 1995, the Companys research
and development activities have been performed primarily outside of Canada. Due
to the limited nature of research and development activities undertaken by the
Company in Canada and the Companys limited financial condition, it has not
submitted a request for any SR&ED related tax credits since 1995. In the
future, when the Companys financial condition improves and it incurs expenses
coming within SR&ED, the Company would seek to apply for such tax credits,
subject to review and approval by the Canadian tax authorities.

The Companys projected research and development budget for 2001 is US$1
million subject to financing. Such amount will be used to commence development
and production of a 2 kilowatt bipolar fuel cell power module. If less than
US$1 million is obtained from financing, the Company will reduce its research
and development budget and the development and production of the bipolar fuel
cell power module will continue, albeit at a slower pace. If no adequate
funding is secured, the research and development of the Companys fuel cell
products will have to be deferred until such financing is in place.

The Companys recently leased premises in Mississauga, Ontario, which will
be used to facilitate implementation of the fuel cell powered golf car project.
The Company is undertaking the purchase of the equipment needed at these
premises. Assuming commercialization of its products, the Company would seek
strategic relationships with manufacturers which have suitable facilities and
access to the markets to produce the products.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

In 1986, Josef V. Soltys of Mississauga, Canada (a shareholder and former
director of the Company), assigned to AI a Canadian patent application for
QUICKCELL, a test cell structure for fuel cell technology. The patent, Canadian
Patent #1,295,679, issued February 11, 1992, expires February 11, 2009. The
Company also holds a United States patent, #5,0008,162, which was issued on
April 16, 1991, and expires on April 16, 2008, for the same product. A former
employee of AI, who was a co-inventor of such technology, did not assign any
right in such patents to the Company prior to his departure. Management does

Page 15



---



##### Table of Contents



not believe that these patents are material to the development of the intended
business goal. When appropriate the Company will seek patent protection for
other aspects of its fuel cell technology. However, the Companys policy is to
maintain the confidentiality of its products, and any disclosure in patent
applications could threaten the security of such information.

The Company has unregistered trademarks on some of its products, including
LABCELL 50, LABCELL 200, QUICKELL QC200 and TESTMASTER.

SMALL FUEL CELLS AND RELATED PRODUCTS

In addition to developing fuel cells, the Company presently sells by mail
order small fuel cells, test cells and electronic test equipment. These
products were initially developed by Mr. Nor for use in the development of the
Astris fuel cell technology. They are described briefly, as follows:



| |  | LABCELL 50 is a 50 square centimeter, small alkaline fuel cell for
laboratory demonstration and experimentation which produces 1.5 to 6
volts.                                                                                                                                                   
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | LABCELL 200 is a 200 square centimeter, medium size alkaline fuel cell
for laboratory experimentation and small power applications which
produces .75 to 12 volts.                                                                                                                               
|
| |  | QUICKCELL QC200 is an electrochemical test cell designed for the
testing of gas diffusion or solid electrodes in a controlled laboratory
environment for fuel cell and battery research, development and quality
control.                                                                        
|
| |  | MODEL TL4 TEST LOAD is a monitor for fuel cells and batteries with a
built-in microprocessor. It functions to briefly interrupt the current and
take resistance-free cell readings up to 20 volts.                                                                                                
|
| |  | TESTMASTER is a powerful, integrated software package designed for
testing fuel cells and batteries. TESTMASTER performs all the tasks
required for short or long-term testing of fuel cells or batteries -
monitoring, control, data collection and storage, and graphical data
representation.

Astris s.r.o. produces and ships the small products on behalf of the
Company. The Company does not presently have any insurance on these products.
Insurance is obtained at the customers request and expense. Astris s.r.o. does
not maintain a substantial inventory of the small products.

The Company currently derives minor amounts of revenues from the sale of
the small products. It remains unknown whether the Company will be able to
further develop a market for these products. The Company is not aware of any
other entity which markets products similar to its small products.

MARKETING

The Companys small products are presently sold by mail order over an
Internet website maintained for the Company by Macnor Corp. Macnor Corp. pays
the Company a fee of 5% of the sales price. See Item 7 Major Shareholders and

Page 16



---



##### Table of Contents



Related Party Transactions of this Report. No change in that arrangement is
presently foreseen.

In October 2000, the Company entered into an agreement with
FuelCellStore.com, Inc. for the inclusion of the Companys products on the
FuelCellStore.com internet website on a non-exclusive basis for sales anywhere
in the world. FuelCellStore.com, Inc. would receive a 10% commission based upon
sales of the Companys products over its internet website.

Currently, the prototypes of the Companys fuel cell systems are shipped
directly to the customer from the Czech Republic. Earlier shipments were from
both the Czech Republic and Canada. It is expected that the future customers of
the Companys fuel cell systems will be manufacturers of all types of products
which will be adapted to utilize the Companys fuel cell technology. The
Company expects such fuel cell systems will be shipped directly from its
facilities to such manufacturers or through a network of distributors and
agents to such manufacturers.

RAW MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES

The principal raw materials that the Company uses are common and widely
available from numerous suppliers. The Companys principal materials are
largely various plastics, carbons, metal oxides and conventional metallic
components, which are all relatively inexpensive to obtain and which do not, at
the current time, present supply problems.

COMPETITION

Fuel cells are a competitive business. Competition arises from other fuel
cell companies and from entities engaged in offering other more conventional
energy services. The Company competes with companies that are developing all
types of fuel cells. While there are currently five basic types of fuel cell
technologies (see Description of Fuel Cells above), the Company believes that
AFCs and PEMs are the only fuel cells that are presently of competitive
relevance for the relatively small power, stationary and portable applications
that the Company intends to focus upon. This is because AFCs and PEMs operate
at ambient temperatures (above 0 degrees Celsius to 100 degrees Celsius) and
deliver kilowatts, which are more suited to meet the needs of small, off-grid
applications. The Company constructs only AFCs. While both AFC and PEM fuel
cells have potential environmental and efficiency advantages over traditional
power sources, the Company believes that AFCs can be manufactured less
expensively, more efficiently and more practically than PEMs in small-scale
applications.

The Company believes that its main competitors are Ballard Power Systems
(Ballard), located in Vancouver, Canada, which concentrates on PEMs and ZeTek
Power PLC (ZeTek), based in London, England, which develops AFCs. Ballard
enjoys the most high-profile status of any fuel cell developer in the world
today. As a result of its market status, any developer of AFC or PEM technology
must compete directly or indirectly with Ballard.

The Companys method for approaching this competitive challenge is simply
to focus on different market segments from those which Ballard or ZeTek
currently focus. For instance, Ballard appears committed, for the foreseeable
future, to developing fuel cells for use in buses and private automobiles.

Page 17



---



##### Table of Contents



ZeTek, according to its website, intends to construct fuel cells ranging from
2.5 to 250 kilowatts and has focused its efforts on constructing fuel cells to
power commercial vehicles, such as buses, taxis and utility vehicles, boat
motors, and entire residential and commercial buildings. The Company is
focusing instead on fuel cells for light vehicles, such as golf cars and
retirement vehicles. However, there are no barriers to Ballard, ZeTek or any
other known or unknown competitor of the Company entering the market covering
light weight vehicles. In addition to mobile applications, the Company is also
focusing on the potential market in stationary applications of small-capacity
fuel cells, as are other fuel cell companies. There are several competitors in
this market.

Apart from specific market competition, the Company believes that AFCs
have inherent advantages over PEMs, regardless of specific applications. AFCs
use potassium hydroxide electrolyte, a chemically basic substance, while PEMs
are chemically acidic, requiring platinum as a catalyst. They also use an
expensive semi-permeable membrane as an electrolyte. In addition, AFCs have
been scientifically proven to be 10% more energy-efficient than PEMs and offer
a higher electricity yield from a given quantity of fuel. That is to say, while
PEMs might be 40-50% efficient, AFCs are 50-60% efficient. This is a
significant advantage in terms of raw energy consumption and cost savings. In
addition, AFCs are able to start instantly, without warm-up, and operate at low
temperatures, even below freezing (to minus 50 degrees Celsius) while PEMs can
only operate above freezing (from 0 degrees Celsius to 100 degrees Celsius).

Also, the capital cost required to produce AFCs is less than that required
to produce PEMs of a similar size and number. Unlike fuel cells based upon PEM
technology, AFCs do not require platinum or machined graphite in their
electrodes or expensive membranes for electrolyte. AFCs are the only type which
work with a broad range of non-noble electrocatalysts (metals and metal
oxides). In addition, AFCs use common industrial chemicals for their
electrolyte and AFC components are made of plastics, metal oxides, activated
carbon and other relatively inexpensive materials while more exotic materials
are required for most products using PEMs technology.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On November 10, 1999, E. Roy Birkett, a former director and officer of the
Company, instituted an action against the Company in the Superior Court of
Justice (Ontario) (File No. 99-CV-179868) seeking recovery of CDN$315,000 he
had advanced on behalf of the Company. Mr. Birkett had been the President of
the Company in 1995 when it acquired Astris Inc. Included in a March 1995
Letter of Intent for the acquisition of Astris Inc. was the binding obligation
of Mr. Birkett and the other then principals of the Company to advance funds to
keep Astris Inc. operating until such time as they had raised or arranged a
financing for the Company of a minimum of US$5 million dollars. Such financing
was never obtained. Mr. Birkett originally sought actual damages in excess of
CDN$315,000, plus costs. Initial examinations for discovery were completed in
October 2000.

In February 2001, Mr. Birketts counsel requested the Company to consent
to an expansion of Mr. Birketts initial claim to $1,627,301 in order to cover
additional expenses he allegedly incurred on behalf of the Company in 1995 with
regards to the proposed financing. The Company has chosen not to oppose this

Page 18



---



##### Table of Contents



request as Canadian civil procedure allows permissive amendments to pleadings
up until judgment.

The Company believes that Mr. Birketts claims are without merit as the
repayment obligation was conditional upon the obtaining of the financing. In
addition, the Company believes that there is no meritorious basis to the
additional claim for expenses. The Company has defended itself vigorously in
this action and will continue to do so in the future.

A final decision in favor of Mr. Birkett would have a material adverse
affect on the Companys financial position. The Company has accrued CDN$315,000
in advances from related parties in the liabilities section of the Companys
Balance Sheet included in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

GOVERNMENTAL REGULATION

No governmental license or approval known to the Company is required in
connection with the manufacture or sale of the Companys current products and
there are no extraordinary governmental regulations known to the Company which
affects its ability to sell or produce its products. The Company does not
believe that it will be subject to existing regulations governing traditional
electric utilities.

The Company anticipates that its products and their installation may be
subject to oversight and regulation related to their safety due to their use of
hydrogen, which is highly flammable and regarded as a hazardous gas. However,
since hydrogen is a commonplace industrial gas which is produced in enormous
quantities every day in numerous industrial facilities around the world and
regulations have been in place for decades regarding hydrogen which provide
routine specifications for manufacturers of hydrogen-using equipment, the
Company does not anticipate any new regulations regarding hydrogen or any
difficulties in complying with existing regulations.

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE

There are no environmental laws known to the
Company which may affect any of its operations as they are currently
constituted. The Company is not involved in a business which involves the use
of materials which are likely to result in a violation of any existing
environmental laws, rules or regulations nor does it own any real property
which would lead to liability as a land owner.

C. ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE.

The Company has two subsidiaries  Astris Inc. (AI) and Astris s.r.o.
The Company owns a 96.3% interest in AI; the remaining interests are held by
non-exchanging shareholders. AI was incorporated initially as Astris Science
Inc. on April 8, 1983, in the Province of Ontario, and changed its name to
Astris Inc. in 1986. The Company also owns a 30% minority interest in Astris
s.r.o., which was organized under the laws of the Czech Republic. The remaining
70% interest in Astris s.r.o. is owned by Macnor Corp., an Ontario corporation
which is wholly-owned by Jiri K. Nor, an executive Officer, Director and
principal shareholder of the Company. Unless otherwise indicated or outside the
context of the disclosure, all references in this registration statement to the
Company shall include AI and Astris s.r.o.

Page 19



---



##### Table of Contents



D.  PROPERTY, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT.

AEI has leased an 1,850 square foot
industrial unit located at 2175 Dunwin
Drive, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada for a period of three years ending April
30, 2003, with an option to renew for an additional three years.

Astris s.r.o. has leased premises in Benesov, Czech Republic. These
facilities include about 325 sq. ft. of office space and about 1,100 sq. ft. of
laboratory space with a chemistry lab, electrode lab, test lab, mechanical shop
and assembly room. The lease is open-ended, requiring three months notice to
terminate and annual review for cost adjustment.

The Company believes that these premises are suitable for its present
requirements.




ITEM 5.  OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS.

This discussion and analysis of the operating results and the financial
position of the Company should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and the notes thereto forming a part of this Annual Report. In
addition to historical information, the following discussion contains
forward-looking statements that reflect the Companys plans, estimates,
intentions, expectations and beliefs. The Companys actual results could differ
materially from those discussed in such forward-looking statements.

The accountants report to the Companys audited financial statements
notes that the Companys ability to continue as a going concern is in
substantial doubt and is dependent upon the success of the efforts of its
Directors and principal shareholders in providing financial support in the
short term, the success of the Company in raising additional long-term
financing either from their own resources or from third parties, the successful
commercialization of one or more of the Companys research projects and the
Company attaining profitable operations.

From the Companys acquisition of Astris Inc. in 1995 and the change of
the business to the development and possible commercialization of certain fuel
cell technology, the Company has been greatly limited by a lack of funds to
pursue fully the necessary research and development activities. Most of the
Companys research and development has been conducted in the Czech Republic by
Astris s.r.o., a 30% owned subsidiary. In 1998, the Company obtained a minor
amount of funds, which it is using to recommence research and development
activities in Canada and also to market certain ancillary products. As noted
under Liquidity and Capital Resources herein, the future of the Company is
dependent upon its ability to raise additional capital to fund the commencement
of the commercialization of products based upon the Companys fuel cell
technology. Management is of the opinion that the Company should continue to
exist and grow, based upon encouraging results of research and development to
date, recent world-wide interest in fuel cell technology and the recent
completion of the golf car program. With the advancement of this research and
development program and the recent completion of the Companys golf car
program, the Company should be in a better position to pursue financing in the
form of private placements of its Common Shares.

Page 20



---



##### Table of Contents



A.  OPERATING RESULTS.

In 1995, the Company acquired AI with the objective to commercialize the
AI AFC technology and to raise US$5 million in financing. Unfortunately, such
financing did not materialize which caused the activities of the Company to be
seriously curtailed. However, in the interim, research and development on
electrode formulations and other aspects of fuel cell technology has continued
to be carried out at the Companys minority-owned subsidiary, Astris s.r.o. in
the Czech Republic, albeit at reduced levels of activity as the Company was
largely inactive from 1996 until October 1998. The Company has only recently
produced and sold a limited number of prototype fuel cell products and
completed a test model of its golf car project. Even if such products were to
be well received commercially and additional financing is retained, the
realization of significant revenues would take several years.

In 1996, CDN$100,000 was received by the Company from three Directors,
Jiri K. Nor (CDN$40,000), Donald Blenkarn (CDN$40,000) and Gerald T. Crawford
(CDN$20,000). See Item 7B Related Party Transactions.

During 1997, proceeds on the issuance of 3,394,850 common shares of the
Company from the exercise of warrants issued in 1995 amounted to CDN$3,395. A
further 748,706 common shares were issued in settlement of outstanding
liabilities of CDN$374,354. There was no funding from related parties during
1997.

The Company had revenue in 1997 of CDN$5,504. This amount was comprised of
CDN$3,871 of accrued interest paid in 1997 by the Canadian government on claims
made by the Company for investment tax credits in 1994 and CDN$1,633 from the
sale of small fuel cells. No one customer accounted for a majority of the sales
of the small fuel cells and related products.

In 1998, an advance of CDN$2,000 was received from Timagami Financial
Services, a company controlled by a shareholder. See Item 7B Related Party
Transactions.

In 1998, as a result of the non-exclusive licence of the Company to EVI,
the Company acquired 200,000 shares of EVI common stock. See Business
Overview in Item 4. The sale of more than 85,000 of these EVI shares in the
spring of 2000 for a total net proceeds of US$250,217, provided the cash
resources necessary to finance the completion of the Companys golf car
project. During the remainder of the year 2000, the Company sold another 11,200
shares of the EVI for a total net proceeds of US$42,163.

There was no financing activity during 1999 or 2000.

The Company had small, insignificant sales of its small fuel cell products
during 1999 and 2000. The agreement with Macnor has not resulted in any sales
revenue to date.

The financial statements included in this report are stated in Canadian
dollars.

During the year ended December 31, 2000, 1,110,078 common shares of the
Company were issued in settlement of outstanding liabilities of CDN$277,519,
and 102,900 common shares were issued upon exercise of warrants at an exercise
price of CDN$.001.

Page 21



---



##### Table of Contents



The Company has incurred operating losses during the last three fiscal
years ended December 31. The net loss for 2000 was CDN$35,580 (after a
non-recurring gain of CDN$376,648 from the sale of shares of EVI held by the
Company) on revenues of CDN$22,824, in 1999 it was CDN$40,666 on revenues of
CDN$21,919 and for 1998 it was CDN$138,660 on revenues of CDN$6,052. The
Company received a CDN$25,000 initial payment from EVI in October 1998.
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP, this amount was recognized over the first year of
the agreements term (October 1998 to December 1999).

Revenue in 2000 was CDN$22,824 and was comprised of a CDN$10,000 royalty
payment from EVI, CDN$5,521 from interest on the funds derived from the sale of
the EVI shares, CDN$1,594 from GST (Goods and Service Tax) compensation,
CDN$5,525 from a currency exchange gain, and CDN$184 from the sale of
literature regarding the Companys fuel sale research. In 1999, revenue was
comprised of CDN$20,250 from the proceeds of the initial payment on the license
agreement and CDN$1,669 from the sale of small fuel cells and related products.
Revenue in 1998 was comprised of CDN$4,750 from the proceeds of the initial
payment and CDN$1,302 from the sale of small fuel cells and related products.
No one customer accounted for a majority of the sales of the small fuel cells
and related products. Throughout its history, the Companys expenses have
varied based upon the amount of funds available to the Company. During this
period Astris s.r.o. has basically self-funded itself through the sale of
ancillary products and government and technical university contracts, none of
which resulted in any license fees to the Company.

Operating expenses were approximately CDN$435,052 in 2000, CDN$62,585 in
1999 and CDN$144,712 in 1998. Due to the sale of laboratory equipment to EVI,
certain operating expenses relating to rent (CDN$15,000 in 1998) and salaries
(CDN$5,000 in 1998), were no longer required to be paid by the Company in 1999
or 2000. Also included in operating expenses are costs associated with
subcontracts. These costs were CDN$180,807 in 2000, CDN$32,782 in 1999,
CDN$79,534 in 1998, and CDN$18,189 in 1997, most of which was to Astris s.r.o.
for performance of research services for the Company. The amount expended for
subcontracts varied according to the amount of service which was provided to
the Company.

Pursuant to a written agreement dated March 9, 2000, CDN$28,666.70 and
21,967 shares of the Companys Common Stock were owing by the Company to
Molesworth Associates, Inc. for advertising and investor relation services
provided from July 31, 2000 through March 31, 2001. The Company agreed to
settle all amounts outstanding up to and including April 30, 2001 under the
contract with Molesworth Associates Inc. in exchange for 70,000 shares of the
Companys Common Stock. Such Common Stock was transferred to Molesworth
Associates, Inc. in June 2001.

The 1998 financial statements were restated to record the value of the EVI
common stock received upon the sale and licensing arrangement at the book value
of the assets transferred to EVI, and not at the market price of the EVI shares
as there were restrictions on the sale of such shares by the Company.

The Companys net earnings were CDN$35,580 for the year ended December 31,
2000 as compared to a net loss of CDN$40,666 for 1999. The rise in earnings can
be directly attributed to a gain of CDN$376,648 on the sale of shares of EVI
held by the Company.

Page 22



---



##### Table of Contents



Transfers of funds from accounts containing U.S. dollars into Canadian
dollar accounts give rise to gains on U.S. exchange and, conversely, transfers
of funds from accounts containing Canadian dollars into U.S. dollar accounts
gives rise to losses on U.S. exchange.

B.  LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES.

The Company has been hindered by a lack of capital. Its recent source of
capital has been the sale of EVI Common Stock. In the year 2000, the Company
sold 97,100 shares of EVI Common Stock and received net proceeds of US$292,380.
In the first quarter of year 2001, the Company sold its remaining 102,900
shares of EVI Common Stock, resulting in net proceeds of US$65,957.

For tax year 1995, when the Company was a Canadian-controlled private
corporation named Astris Inc., the Company submitted a request on Form T661 to
the Canada Custom and Revenue Agency (the CRA) for a refund of CDN$157,720
representing a portion of the research and development expenses for that year.
The CRA initially awarded the Company CDN$39,421. The Company challenged that
determination. This matter has recently been resolved, and the Company expects
to receive a refund of approximately CDN$61,000 plus applicable interest. See
Research and Development.

In March 2001, three Directors of the Company loaned an aggregate of
CDN$67,500 to the Company. Each of these loans were subsequently retired by the
Company and the Directors in exchange for options to purchase shares of the
Companys Common Stock. See Compensation below.

The Company will seek further outside capital through a sale of its Common
Stock in a private placement offering. The Company has been approached by major
financial institutions that are active in arranging such financing for the fuel
cell industry. The Company has recently succeeded in posting its Common Stock
on the O.T.C. Bulletin Board in order to facilitate such a financing.

In addition, the Company also is in the early stages of establishing a
strategic partnership with a manufacturer of related products.

C.  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, PATENTS AND LICENSES, ETC.

See Research and Development in Section 4.

D.  TREND INFORMATION.

As the Companys current development project moves forward through the
year 2001, it is anticipated that the Companys progress should stimulate
interest in the Company that will be reflected in increased market activity and
rising share prices, dependent upon general market conditions. The Company will
seek to enter into private placements, strategic partnerships and joint
ventures in order to raise capital to finance the on-going development and
commercialization of its fuel cell technology. The Company does not have any
present agreement to enter into any private placements, strategic partnerships
or joint ventures. In addition, there is no assurance that the Company will be
able to find or enter into any private placements, strategic partnerships or
joint ventures on terms acceptable to the Company or not highly dilutive to
shareholders.

Page 23



---



##### Table of Contents



In the future, the Company will seek to obtain the necessary financing to
establish a pilot production facility for the manufacture of a total of 2,000
kilowatt per year of fuel cell systems in various sizes up to three or four
kilowatts each, for testing in a variety of both stationary and mobile
applications. It is estimated this stage will require approximately CDN$10
million over the next three years.

In anticipation and preparation for these developments, the Company is
attempting to identify potential strategic partners who can be approached.
Factors to be considered in selecting strategic partners are:



| |  |  | natural linking of each-others products (e.g. golf car
manufacturers, car motor manufacturers, etc.);
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  |  | adequate funding capabilities;                                                                        
|
| |  |  | ability to understand the Companys research and development
activities; and                          
|
| |  |  | compatible business philosophies.                                                                     




ITEM 6.  DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES.

A.  DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT.

The following table sets forth the
name, age and office held with the Company as of June 1, 2001 and the period
during which such person has served as a Director and/or executive Officer.

|                      |  |     |    |             |  |                                                 |  |  |      | 
|--------------------- |  | --- | -- | ----------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  |  | ---- | 
|Name                  |  | Age |    | Office Held |  | Director Since                                 
|                      |  |     |    |             |  |                                                
|Jiri K. Nor           |  |     | 61 |             |  | President, Chief Executive Officer              |  |  | 1996 | 
|Derek Bullock         |  |     | 63 |             |  | Director                                        |  |  | 2000 | 
|Gerald A. Crawford(1) |  |     | 67 |             |  | Director                                        |  |  | 1996 | 
|Donald A. Blenkarn(1) |  |     | 70 |             |  | Secretary and Director                          |  |  | 1995 | 
|Gordon T. Emerson     |  |     | 63 |             |  | Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director |  |  | 1999 | 

Notes:



|(1) |  | Members of the Companys Audit Committee.
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------

Jiri K. Nor has been a Director and the President of the Company since March
1996. He is a trained engineer, with particular expertise in mechanics,
aeronautics, electronics and electrochemistry. He is the principal developer of
the Companys fuel cell technology. For more than the past five years, Mr. Nor
has also been President and CEO of the Company and Astris s.r.o., and also the

Page 24



---



##### Table of Contents



President and sole stockholder of Macnor Corp. For more than five years until
August 1997, he was Vice President, Research of Norvik Technologies and Norvik
Traction, companies in the business of developing fast battery chargers.

Gerald A. Crawford has been a Director of the Company since March 1996, and has
been associated with Astris Inc. since 1987 in marketing and public relations
areas. He is a trained metallurgical engineer, having been associated with
various companies from 1960 to 1987, and since 1989 has been a self-employed
consultant primarily in the area of metallurgical engineering environmental
matters to the nickel industry, providing services to corporate clients,
including Astris, for the past 11 years.

Donald A. Blenkarn has been a Director and Secretary of the Company since
October 1995. For over five years, he has been Managing Director of Timagami
Financial Services Ltd., located in Mississauga, Canada. From 1972 to 1993, he
was a Progressive Conservative Party Member of Parliament and from 1984 to
1991, he was the Chair of the House of Commons Finance Committee, and
Vice-Chair from 1991 to 1993. Mr. Blenkarn practiced law from 1952 to 1983 with
the firm of Blenkarn, Kerr and Shadlock, Mississauga, Ontario

Gordon T. Emerson has been a Director of the Company since 1999 and its
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer since April 2000. During his career, Mr.
Emerson has raised capital for a number of Canadian companies, including Spar
Aerospace, Corona Mining and Morgan Hydrocarbons. For more than the past five
years he has been a consultant to public companies in Canada with respect to
capital structure and financing transactions.

Derek Bullock has been a Director of the Company since September 19, 2000. Mr.
Bullock is a trained engineer and has been the President of Bullock Engineering
Corporation, a Canadian mining and mineral resource consulting and management
organization since 1980.

There are no family relationships between any of the persons named above
nor are there any arrangements or understandings with major shareholders,
customers, suppliers or others, pursuant to which any person referred to above
was selected as a Director or member of senior management.

B.  COMPENSATION

For the two fiscal years ended December 31, 1999, the Company did not pay
any cash compensation to its executive Officers, although for 1998 and 1999,
CDN$90,000 was expensed for Jiri K. Nor and CDN$36,000 for Gerald A. Crawford
for consulting fees. The Company issued Common Shares for these accrued
consulting fees, as well as for other expenses, including consulting fees and
cash advances, to the Officers and Directors of the Company at the rate of
CDN$0.25 per Common Share.

Page 25



---



##### Table of Contents



|                 |  |               |           |             |  |             |        |    
|---------------- |  | ------------- | --------- | ----------- |  | ----------- | ------ | ---
|                 |  | Number of     |           |             |  |            
|Officer/Director |  | Common Shares |           | Liabilities
|                 |  |               |           |            
|J. Nor           |  |               | 434,980   |             |  | CDN$108,745 | (1)   
|D. Blenkarn      |  |               | 327,108   |             |  |             | 81,777 | (2)
|G. Emerson       |  |               | 200,000   |             |  |             | 50,000 | (3)
|G. Crawford      |  |               | 139,643   |             |  |             | 34,910 | (4)
|                 |  |               |           |             |  |             |        |    
|                 |  |               | 1,101,731 | (5)         |  | CDN$275,432
|                 |  |               |           |             |  |             |        |    

---

|(1) |  | For Consulting (CDN$90,000  360,000 shares), cash advances (CDN$5,500 -
22,000 shares) and expense reimbursement (CDN$13,245  52,980 shares).
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|   
|   
|   
|(2) |  | For Consulting (CDN$30,215  120,863 shares), cash advances (CDN$30,357 -
121,429) and expense reimbursement (CDN$21,204  84,816 shares).     
|   
|   
|   
|   
|(3) |  | For Consulting (CDN$50,000).                                                                                                                   
|   
|   
|   
|   
|(4) |  | For Consulting (CDN$25,787  103,148), cash advances (CDN$2,500  10,000
shares) and expense reimbursement (CDN$6,623  26,495).               
|   
|   
|   
|   
|(5) |  | An
additional payment was made to Richard S. Clewes, a former director who
is now deceased (208,347 shares).                                   

For the 2000 fiscal year, the Company paid compensation of CDN$76,500 in
cash. Mr. Nor received CDN$54,000 and Mr. Emerson received CDN$22,500. In
addition, the Company issued Common Shares at market value in lieu of cash to
its executive Officers for services rendered to the Company. See below.

The Company does not have any employment agreement with any executive
Officer. There does not currently exist any compensation arrangement for any of
the Directors nor does the Company have any pension, retirement or similar plan
for its executive Officers or Directors.

In fiscal year 2000, the Companys stockholders adopted the 2000 Stock
Option Plan (the Plan), pursuant to which options could be granted to
purchase 1,000,000 Common Shares. The purpose of the Plan was to advance the
interests of the Company by affording its Officers, Directors, employees and
consultants the opportunity of acquiring equity interests in the Company. These
Options had an exercise price of not less than the market price of the Common
Shares at the time or if there was not public market price, at the fair market
value as determined by the Board of Directors on the day preceding the date of
grant. The options were exercisable over a number of years specified at the
time of the grant, which term was not to exceed five years from the date of
grant.

Page 26



---



##### Table of Contents



As at April 16, 2001, options for the purchase of an aggregate of
1,000,000 Common Shares had been granted under the Plan to employees of the
Company, including options for 500,000 Common Shares to two executive Officers
and the five Directors at various exercise prices.

On March 8, 2000, Jiri K. Nor and Gordon T. Emerson, both Directors and
executive Officers, were each granted options to purchase 250,000 Common Shares
exercisable for five years at an exercise price CDN$0.25 per share. The options
to Mr. Nor were conditioned upon him completing the current golf car project by
March 31, 2001. Since the golf car program was completed by March 31, 2001, the
Directors acknowledged that Mr. Nor had earned his options. Mr. Nor had
previously loaned CDN$22,500 to the Company in March 2001. See Related Party
Transactions below. Mr. Nor exercised all 250,000 options for CDN$0.25 per
share by paying CDN$40,000 in cash and by agreeing to retire the entire
outstanding loan of CDN$22,500 to the Company.

The options to Mr. Emerson are conditioned on arranging a private
placement for the Company to net the treasury US$1,000,000. Since such
financing has yet to be procured, these options have not yet been granted.

In addition, options to purchase shares of the Companys Common Stock were
granted to the following Directors and employees. The options have an exercise
price of US$.50 1/2 and must be exercised by August 15, 2005, subject to
earlier termination.

|                |  |          |  |         |        |            |         | 
|--------------- |  | -------- |  | ------- | ------ | ---------- | ------- | 
|                |  |          |  |         |        | NUMBER    
|                |  |          |  |         |        | OF OPTIONS
|NAME            |  | POSITION |  | GRANTED
|                |  |          |  |        
|Donald Blenkarn |  | Director |  |         | 37,500 |           
|Gerald Crawford |  | Director |  |         | 37,500 |           
|Jiri K. Nor     |  | Director |  |         | 50,000 |           
|Gordon Emerson  |  | Director |  |         | 50,000 |           
|Derek Bullock   |  | Director |  |         | 50,000 |           
|Jerry Benedik   |  | Employee |  |         | 50,000 |           
|Peter Sinkner   |  | Employee |  |         | 50,000 |           
|                |  |          |  |         |        |            |         | 
|TOTAL           |  |          |  |         |        |            | 325,000 | 
|                |  |          |  |         |        |            |         | 

Mr. Blenkarn exercised his option to purchase 37,500 shares of the
Companys Common Stock at US$.50 1/2. Mr. Blenkarn had previously made two
loans to the Company in March 2001 for the aggregate amount of CDN$22,500. See
Related Party Transactions below. In exchange for the options, Mr. Blenkarn
retired the outstanding loan of CDN$22,500 and paid the Company CDN$6,853.

Page 27



---



##### Table of Contents



Mr. Gerald Crawford exercised his options to purchase 37,500 shares of
the Companys Common Stock at US$.50 1/2. Mr. Crawford had previously made two
loans to the Company in March 2001 for the aggregate amount of CDN$22,5000. See
Related Party Transactions below. In exchange for the options, Mr. Crawford
retired the outstanding loan of CDN$22,500 and paid the Company CDN$6,853.

In recognition of his work on the golf car program for the year April 1,
2000 to March 31, 2001, the Company granted Mr. Nor a bonus of CDN$48,000. Mr.
Nor agreed to receive 51,538 shares of the Common Stock of the Company in lieu
of a cash payment. The Company valued the shares at US$0.53, the mean price for
the year 2000.

In addition to his duties as a Director of the Company, Mr. Gerald
Crawford provided consulting services to the Company in 2000. Such services
were valued at CDN$10,450. Mr. Crawford agreed to receive 13,397 shares of the
Common Stock of the Company in lieu of a cash payment. The Company valued the
shares at US$0.53, the mean price for the year 2000.

In October 1998, in connection with the entry into the License Agreement
with EVI, the Company granted an option to EVI for the purchase of 1,000,000
Common Shares at an exercise price of US$.30 per share, expiring in October
2003.

C.  BOARD PRACTICES.

The Board of Directors may consist of from three to ten members, and is
currently comprised of five members. Each Director is elected by the
shareholders to serve until the next annual meeting or until a successor is
elected or appointed. The date of the next annual meeting has not been set, but
will take place sometime in the fall of 2001.

For a list of the Directors and the period during which the current
Directors have served in that office, please see Section 6A above.

The Directors of the Company do not currently have any service contracts
with the Company providing for benefits upon termination of employment. There
does not currently exist any compensation arrangement for any of the Directors.
The Company does not have any pension, retirement or similar plan for its
Directors.

Gerald A. Crawford and Donald A. Blenkarn are members of the Companys
Audit Committee. There are no additional committees of the Board.

D.  EMPLOYEES.

AEI and AI presently have four Officers and three other employees  a
full-time Executive Assistant and two part-time technical experts. The
President is also the General Manager of the current project on a full-time
basis. Job descriptions for employees in such small, entrepreneurial companies
as the Company tend to be rather flexible, but clearly the principal role of
the General Manager is to oversee the progress of the current project to ensure
it is completed satisfactorily, on budget and on time. The Executive Assistant
is responsible for reception, bookkeeping, and other details of general office
administration, including assisting the General Manager. As the development of

Page 28



---



##### Table of Contents



its products progresses, the Company believes that it will employ two
additional technologists/technicians. None of the present employees is
represented by a labor union. The Company considers its relationship with its
employees to be satisfactory.

E.  SHARE OWNERSHIP.

The following table lists, as of June 12, 2001, the beneficial share
holdings in the Common Shares, which are the only outstanding voting securities
of the Company, of (i) each of the Companys Executive Officers and Directors
of the Company; and (ii) all of the Companys Executive Officers and Directors
as a group:

|                                                |  |                     |           |          |  |  |       |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | --------- | -------- |  |  | ----- | -
|                                                |  | Amount and Nature   |           | Percent 
|Name                                            |  | of Beneficial Owner |           | of Class
|                                                |  |                     |           |         
|Jiri K. Nor (1)                                 |  |                     | 2,031,156 |          |  |  | 16.11 | %
|Gerald A. Crawford (2)                          |  |                     | 990,662   |          |  |  | 7.85  | %
|Donald A. Blenkarn                              |  |                     | 766,328   |          |  |  | 6.07  | %
|Gordon Emerson (3)                              |  |                     | 200,000   |          |  |  | 1.59  | %
|                                                |  |                     |           |          |  |  |       |  
|All executive Officers and
Directors as a group |  |                     | 3,988,146 |          |  |  | 30.03 | %
|                                                |  |                     |           |          |  |  |       |  



---

|(1) |  | Includes (i) 1,894,487 Common Shares held by Jiri K. Nor and (ii) 208,669
Common Shares held by his wife, Jana Nor.                                                                                                                                 
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|   
|   
|   
|(2) |  | Includes (i) 719,076 Common Shares held by Gerald A. Crawford and (ii)
349,086 Common Shares held by his wife, Gail Crawford. This amount
does not include 250,000 options conditioned upon Mr. Emerson
arranging certain financing for the Company.
|   
|   
|   
|   
|(3) |  | Includes (i) 25,000 Common Shares by Gordon T. Emerson, (ii) 125,000
Common Shares by his wife, Barbara Emerson, and (iii) 50,000 Common Shares by
Mr. Emersons children.                                                                          

The Companys stockholders adopted the 2000 Stock Option Plan in June
2000. See Item 6B above for a description of the Plan.




ITEM 7.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.

A.  MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS

The following table lists, as of June 12, 2001, the beneficial share
holdings in the Common Shares, which are the only outstanding voting securities
of the Company, of all persons who are known to the Company to beneficially
own, directly or indirectly, five percent or more of the issued and outstanding
Common Shares:

Page 29



---



##### Table of Contents



|                      |  |                     |           |          |  |  |       |  
|--------------------- |  | ------------------- | --------- | -------- |  |  | ----- | -
|                      |  | Amount and Nature   |           | Percent 
|Name                  |  | of Beneficial Owner |           | of Class
|                      |  |                     |           |         
|Jiri K. Nor(1)        |  |                     | 2,031,156 |          |  |  | 16.11 | %
|Gerald A. Crawford(2) |  |                     | 990,662   |          |  |  | 7.85  | %
|Donald A. Blenkarn    |  |                     | 766,328   |          |  |  | 6.07  | %



---

|(1) |  | Includes (i) 1,894,487 Common Shares held by Jiri K. Nor and (ii) 208,669
Common Shares held by his wife, Jana Nor.          
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|   
|   
|   
|(2) |  | Includes (i) 719,076 Common Shares held by Gerald A. Crawford and (ii) 349,086
Common Shares held by his wife, Gail Crawford.

There has not been any significant change in the percentage ownership held
by any major shareholder during the past three years.

The Companys major shareholders do not have any different voting rights
from other holders of the Common Shares.

For a discussion of the number of shares of Common Stock held in Canada,
please see Item 9 below.

To the Companys knowledge, it is not directly or indirectly owned or
controlled by another corporation(s), by any foreign government or by any other
natural or legal person(s). The Company does not know of any arrangement the
operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of
the Company.

B.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As of June 2001, the Company has issued a total of 74,935 shares of its
Common Stock to the current Officers and Directors of the Company related to
compensation.

The following amounts were loaned by Directors of the Company to the
Company in March 2001 in order to cover the Companys operating expenses.

|                |  |             |  | 
|--------------- |  | ----------- |  | 
|DIRECTOR        |  | AMOUNT     
|                |  |            
|Jiri K. Nor     |  | CDN $22,500
|Gerald Crawford |  | CDN $22,500
|Donald Blenkarn |  | CDN $22,500
|                |  |             | 
|TOTAL           |  | CDN $67,500

Page 30



---



##### Table of Contents



Each of these loans were subsequently retired by the Company and
the Directors in exchange for options to purchase shares of the Companys
Common Stock. See Compensation above.

As of September 13, 1999, the Company entered into a royalty arrangement
with Macnor Corporation, an Ontario corporation (Macnor), which is
wholly-owned by Jiri K. Nor, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of
the Company. This arrangement calls for the sale by Macnor of certain fuel cell
products developed and manufactured by Astris s.r.o. (small fuel cells) through
a website and mail order opened and operated by Macnor. Macnor is to pay an
annual royalty equal to five (5%) percent from all sales of such goods, based
upon gross revenues. No royalty was paid for fiscal 1999 or 2000 and the
agreement with the Macnor has not resulted in any sales revenue to date.

Macnor Corporation also owns 70% of Astris s.r.o., which presently
conducts a substantial portion of the research and development of the Company.
The Company owns the remaining 30% of Astris s.r.o.

As discussed in Item 4, the Company has licensed on a non-exclusive basis,
its fuel cell technology to Astris s.r.o. and EVI.

As at December 31, 1999 and 1998, the Company owed CDN$37,204 in principal
and CDN$12,400 in accrued interest only up to December 31, 1998 to Timagami
Financial Services (Timagami) as per an agreement. This advance was unsecured
and bore interest at 12% per annum until December 31, 1998, and thereafter, per
the term of the partys agreement, has been non-interest bearing. There were no
specific repayment terms. All but CDN$2,000 of the principal outstanding was
paid by the Company to Timagami in fiscal year 2000. All interest remains
outstanding. Donald A. Blenkarn, a Director and Secretary of the Company, is
Managing Director of Timagami.

As at December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998, the Company owed CDN$100,000 in
principal and CDN$54,000 of accrued interest to Mr. Blenkarn (CDN$40,000), Mr.
Crawford (CDN$20,000) and Mr. Nor (CDN$40,000), as payment for advances made by
them to the Company under the terms of a debenture, dated September 30, 1996.
The amount owed is secured and bears interest at 12% per annum. Messrs.
Blenkarn, Crawford and Nor have agreed that they will not demand repayment of
the principal and interest until after July 7, 2002. The amount owed is
collateralized by a lien on all of the assets and business of AI.

At December 31, 1999 and 1998, CDN$50,637 was owed to Astris s.r.o., a
company in which the Company has a 30% interest, for sub-contracted research
services. This liability was settled by the payment of cash in the year 2000.

The management of the Company believes that each of the aforementioned
transactions was on terms as fair to the Company as any which could have been
made with unaffiliated parties.

C.  INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL.

Not Applicable.

Page 31



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 8.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION.

A.  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Reference is
made to Item 18 for a list of all financial statements and notes related thereto
filed as part of this Annual Report.

B.  SIGNIFICANT CHANGES.

There have been no significant changes which have occurred since the date
of the annual financial statements included in this Report.

DIVIDEND POLICY.

The Company has not paid dividends within the last five fiscal years. For
a description of the Board of Directors ability to distribute dividends, please
see Item 10B below.




ITEM 9.  THE OFFER AND LISTING.

MARKETS AND PRICE HISTORY OF THE COMPANYS STOCK.

As of June 12, 2001, the Company had approximately 120 stockholders of
record for its Common Shares and 12,607,719 Common Shares were issued and
outstanding. The Company believes that there is a considerable number of
beneficial holders of the Common Shares as a substantial number of Common
Shares is held of record by principal depositories in Canada and the United
States. As at June 1, 2001, the shareholder list showed 27 registered
shareholders in the United States holding a total of 244,136 Common Shares,
plus 4,021,675 Common Shares in the name of Cede & Co. The Company estimates
that the holdings in Cede & Co. represented approximately 700 beneficial
shareholders. Thus, United States residents hold approximately 4,266,411 Common
Shares, or 33.8% of the Companys outstanding Common Shares. Depositories in
Canada held Common Shares for 519 persons.

The Common Shares were previously traded in Canada on the Canadian Dealing
Network (CDNX), but presently has an inactive listing on the CDNX. The Company
would seek to reactivate such listing once it meets the initial listing
requirements of the CDNX. The Company does not presently meet the following
requirements to qualify to list on the CDNX: net tangible assets of
CDN$750,000, unallocated funds of CDN$100,000 and/or the required amount of
working capital to cover the Companys administrative expenses for 12 months.
The Common Shares have been traded in the United States on the pink sheets
dealer network under the symbol ASRF. Since June 20, 2001, the Companys Common
Shares have been posted for traded on the O.T.C. Bulletin Board under the
symbol ASRNF. The quarterly highs and lows bid prices for the past two fiscal
years as reported in the pink sheets are tabulated below:

Page 32



---



##### Table of Contents



|        |  |           |      |           |  |   |      | 
|------- |  | --------- | ---- | --------- |  | - | ---- | 
|        |  | High,     |      | Low,     
|Quarter |  | US$/share |      | US$/share
|        |  |           |      |          
|1999    |  |           |      |           |  |   |      | 
|First   |  | $         | 0.20 |           |  | $ | 0.08 | 
|Second  |  |           | 0.34 |           |  |   | 0.12 | 
|Third   |  |           | 0.20 |           |  |   | 0.01 | 
|Fourth  |  |           | 0.08 |           |  |   | 0.01 | 
|       
|2000    |  |           |      |           |  |   |      | 
|First   |  |           | 2.75 |           |  |   | 0.03 | 
|Second  |  |           | 1.05 |           |  |   | 0.38 | 
|Third   |  |           | 1.25 |           |  |   | 0.35 | 
|Fourth  |  |           | 1.03 |           |  |   | 0.35 | 

The following table sets forth the high and low market prices for each of
the past six months:

|                       |  |           |      |           |  |   |     | 
|---------------------- |  | --------- | ---- | --------- |  | - | --- | 
|                       |  | High,     |      | Low,     
|Month                  |  | US$/share |      | US$/share
|                       |  |           |      |          
|2001                   |  |           |      |           |  |   |     | 
|January                |  | $         | .90  |           |  | $ | .55 | 
|February               |  |           | .55  |           |  |   | .35 | 
|March                  |  |           | .65  |           |  |   | .40 | 
|April                  |  |           | .58  |           |  |   | .44 | 
|May                    |  |           | 1.00 |           |  |   | .45 | 
|June (through
June 20) |  |           | .98  |           |  |   | .70 | 

Page 33



---



##### Table of Contents






ITEM 10.  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

A.  SHARE CAPITAL.

Not Applicable.

B.  MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION.

ORGANIZATION.

The Company was incorporated in the Province of Ontario,
Canada.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The Companys by-laws provide that, subject to any unanimous shareholder
agreement, the Board of Directors shall manage or supervise the management of
the business and affairs of the Corporation. The powers of the board may be
exercised at a meeting at which a quorum is present or by resolution in writing
signed by all the Directors entitled to vote on that resolution at a meeting of
the board. Where there is a vacancy in the board, the remaining Directors may
exercise all the powers of the board so long as a quorum remains in office.

MEETINGS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.

The Companys by-laws provide that meetings of the Board of Directors may
be held at any place within or outside Ontario and in any financial year of the
Corporation a majority of the meetings need not be held in Canada. Meetings of
the board shall be held from time to time at such time and at such place as the
Board of Directors, the chair of the board, the managing Director, the
President or any two Directors may determine.

BORROWING POWER.

The Companys by-laws provide that without limiting the borrowing powers
of the Corporation as set forth in the Business Corporation Act (Ontario) (the
Act), but subject to the articles and any unanimous shareholder agreement,
the Board of Directors may from time to time on behalf of the Corporation,
without authorization of the shareholders:



| |  | borrow money upon the credit of the Corporation;                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |  | issue, reissue, sell or pledge bonds, debentures, notes or other
evidences of indebtedness or guarantee of the Corporation, whether
secured or unsecured;                                                                                                                           
|
| |  | to the extent permitted by the Act, give directly or indirectly
financial assistance to any person by means of a loan, a guarantee
or otherwise on behalf of the Corporation to secure performance of
any present or future indebtedness, liability or obligation of any
person; and
|
| |  | mortgage, hypothecate, pledge or otherwise create a security interest
in all or any currently owned or subsequently acquired real or
personal, movable or immovable, property of the Corporation including                                                                          

Page 34



---



##### Table of Contents





| |  | book debts, rights, powers, franchises and undertakings, to secure
any such bonds, debentures, notes or other evidences of indebtedness
or guarantee or any other present or future indebtedness, liability
or obligation of the Corporation.
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DIVIDENDS.

The Companys by-laws provide that, subject to the Act, the articles
and any unanimous shareholder agreement, the Board of Directors may from time to
time declare dividends payable to the shareholders according to their
respective rights and interests in the Corporation. Dividends may be paid in
money or property or by issuing fully paid shares of the Corporation or options
or rights to acquire fully paid shares of the Corporation. Any dividend
unclaimed after a period of six years from the date on which the same has been
declared to be payable shall be forfeited and shall revert to the Corporation.

C.  MATERIAL CONTRACTS.

The Company has not entered into any contracts in the last two years
outside of the ordinary course of business that have had or will have a
material effect on its business.

D.  EXCHANGE CONTROLS AND OTHER LIMITATIONS AFFECTING SECURITY HOLDERS.

There are no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Canada relating
to restrictions on the import/export of capital affecting the remittance of
interest, dividends or other payments to non-residential holders of the
Companys Common Shares. Any such remittances to United States residents,
however, are subject to a 15% withholding tax pursuant to Article X of the
reciprocal tax treaty between Canada and the United States. See Part E below.

Except as provided in the Investment Canada Act (the Act), there are no
limitations under the laws of Canada, the Province of Ontario or in the charter
or any other constituent documents of the Company on the right of foreigners to
hold and/or vote the Common Shares of the Company.

The Act requires a non-Canadian making an investment to acquire control of
a Canadian business, the gross assets of which exceed certain defined threshold
levels, to file an application for review with Investment Canada, the federal
agency created by the Act.

As a result of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, the Act was amended
in January 1989 to provide distinct threshold levels for Americans who acquire
control of a Canadian business.

A Canadian business is defined in the Act as a business carried on in
Canada that has a place of business in Canada, an individual or individuals in
Canada who are employed or self-employed in connection with the business, and
assets in Canada used in carrying on the business.

An American, as defined in the Act, includes: an individual who is an
American national or a lawful permanent resident of the United States; a
government or government agency of the United States; an American-controlled
entity, corporation or limited partnership or trust which is not controlled in
fact through ownership of its voting interests of which two-thirds of its Board

Page 35



---



##### Table of Contents



of Directors, general partners or trustees, as the case may be, are any
combination of Canadians or Americans.

The following investments by a non-Canadian are subject to review by
Investment Canada:



| | (a) |  | all direct acquisitions of control of Canadian businesses with assets
of CDN$5 million or more;                                                                                                                                 
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (b) |  | all indirect acquisitions of control of Canadian businesses with
assets of CDN$50 million or more if such assets represent less
than 50% of the value of the assets of the entities, the control
of which is being acquired; and
|
| | (c) |  | all indirect acquisitions of control of Canadian businesses with
assets of CDN$5 million or more if such assets represent more
than 50% of the value of the assets of the entities, the control
of which is being acquired.     

Review by Investment Canada is required when investments by Americans
exceed CDN$150 million for direct acquisitions of control. For the purposes of
the Act, direct acquisition of control means: a purchase of the voting interest
on a corporation, partnership, joint venture or trust carrying on a Canadian
business, or any purchase of all or substantially all of the assets used in
carrying on a Canadian business; and indirect acquisition of control means a
purchase of the voting interest of a corporation, partnership, joint venture or
trust, whether a Canadian or foreign entity, which controls a corporation,
partnership, joint venture or trust carrying on a Canadian business in Canada.

The acquisition of certain Canadian businesses is excluded from the higher
thresholds set out for Americans. These excluded businesses include oil, gas,
uranium, financial services (except insurance); transportation services and
cultural services (i.e. the publication, distribution or sale of books,
magazines, periodicals (other than printing or typesetting businesses), music
in print or machine readable form, radio, television, cable and satellite
services; the publication, distribution, sale or exhibitions of film or video
recordings or audio or video music recordings).

Direct or indirect acquisitions of control of these excluded businesses
are reviewable at the CDN$5 and CDN$50 million thresholds.

A non-Canadian shall not implement an investment reviewable under the Act
unless the investment has been reviewed and the Minister responsible for
Investment Canada is satisfied or is deemed to be satisfied that the investment
is likely to be of net benefit to Canada. If the Minister is not satisfied that
the investment is likely to be a net benefit to Canada, the non-Canadian shall
not implement the investment or, if the investment has been implemented, shall
divest himself of control of the business that is the subject of the
investment.

A non-Canadian or American making the following investments:

| |                                                            
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) an investment to establish a new Canadian business; and

Page 36



---



##### Table of Contents



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (ii) an investment to acquire control of a Canadian business which
investment is not subject to review under the Act, must notify Investment
Canada, within prescribed time limits, of such investments.

E.  TAXATION.

CANADIAN INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

Management of the Company considers that the following discussion
respecting taxation fairly describes the principal and material Canadian
federal income tax consequences applicable to shareholders of the Company who
are residents of the United States and are not residents of Canada and do not
hold, and are deemed not to hold, Common Shares of the Company in connection
with carrying on a business in Canada (a non-resident).

Generally, dividends paid by Canadian corporations to non-resident
shareholders are subject to a withholding tax of 25% of the gross amount of
such dividends. However, Article X of the reciprocal tax treaty between Canada
and the United States reduced to 15% the withholdings tax on the gross amount
of dividends paid to residents of the United States. A further 10% reduction in
1997 in the withholding tax rates on the gross amount of dividends is
applicable when a U.S. corporation owns at least 10% of the voting stock of the
Canadian corporation paying the dividends.

A non-resident who holds Common Shares of the Company as capital property
will not subject to tax on capital gains realized on the disposition of such
Shares unless such Shares are taxable Canadian property within the meaning of
the Income Tax Act (Canada), and no relief is afforded under any applicable tax
treaty. The Common Shares would be taxable Canadian property of a non-resident
if, at any time during the five year period immediately preceding a disposition
by the non-resident of such Shares (a) not less than 25% of the issued shares
of any class of the Company belonged to the non-resident, (b) the person with
whom the non-resident deal did not deal at arms length, or (c) the
non-resident and any person with whom the non-resident did not deal at arms
length.

UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES

The following discussion describes the United States federal income tax
consequences of the ownership and disposition of Common Shares of the Company.
The discussion contained in this summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, as amended (the Code), existing and proposed Treasury Regulations,
judicial decisions and administrative pronouncements, all of which are subject
to change. Any such changes may be applied retroactively in a manner that could
result in federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below.

This summary discusses only Common Shares of the Company held by a U.S.
Holder (defined below) as a capital asset within the meaning of Section 1221 of
the Code, and does not deal with special situations, such as those of banks,
thrift institutions, real estate investment trusts, regulated investment
companies, insurance companies, dealers in securities or commodities,
tax-exempt investors, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar,
persons who hold Common Shares of the Company as a position in a straddle, as
part of a synthetic security or hedge, as part of a conversion transaction or
other integrated investment, or persons who are not U.S. Holders (as defined

Page 37



---



##### Table of Contents



below). Further, the summary does not include any description of any
alternative minimum tax consequences or any state, local or foreign tax
consequences that may be applicable. This summary assumes that no U.S. Holder
will own, directly or indirectly, Common Shares of the Company representing 10%
or more of the voting power of the Company.

HOLDERS OF COMMON SHARES OF THE COMPANY ARE URGED TO CONSULT THEIR TAX
ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE TAX CONSEQUENCES TO THEM OF THE OWNERSHIP AND
DISPOSITION OF SUCH SHARES IN LIGHT OF THEIR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES,
INCLUDING THE TAX CONSEQUENCES UNDER STATE, LOCAL, FOREIGN AND OTHER TAX LAWS,
AND THE POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN UNITED STATES FEDERAL OR OTHER TAX LAWS.

As used herein, a U.S. Holder means a beneficial owner of Common Shares
of the Company who is (I) a citizen or resident of the United States, (ii) a
corporation, partnership or other entity created or organized in or under the
laws of the United States or any State thereof or the District of Columbia,
(iii) an estate the income of which is subject to United States federal income
taxation regardless of its source, or (iv) a trust the administration of which
is subject to the primary supervision of a court within the United States and
for which one or more U.S. persons have the authority to control all
substantial decisions.

Dividends

Distributions with respect to the Common Shares (other than liquidating
distributions and certain distributions in redemption of the Common Shares)
which are paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, as
calculated for United States federal income tax purposes, generally will
constitute dividends taxable as ordinary income. To the extent the amount of
any such distribution paid with respect to the Common Shares exceeds current
and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for United States federal
income tax purposes, such excess distribution will not constitute a dividend
for United States federal income tax purposes, but will be treated first as a
tax-free return of capital to the extent of the holders adjusted tax basis in
his Common Shares (with a corresponding reduction in such basis) and, to the
extent the distribution exceeds such basis, as a capital gain.

Foreign Tax Credit

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has had withheld from distributions) Canadian
income tax with respect to the ownership of Common Shares of the Company may be
entitled, at the option of the U.S. Holder, to either a deduction or a tax
credit for such foreign tax paid or withheld. This election is made on a
year-by-year basis and applies to all foreign taxes paid by (or withheld from)
the U.S. Holder during that year. There are significant and complex limitations
that apply to the credit, among which is the general limitation that the credit
cannot exceed the proportionate share of the U.S. Holders United States
Federal income tax liability that the U.S. Holders foreign source income bears
to his worldwide taxable income. The availability of the foreign tax credit and
the application of the limitations on the credit are fact specific and holders
and prospective holders of Common Shares should consult their own tax advisors
regarding their individual circumstances.

Page 38



---



##### Table of Contents



Dispositions, Including Redemptions

Any sale, exchange, redemption (except as discussed below) or other
disposition of the Common Shares generally will result in taxable gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount received upon the sale, exchange,
redemption or other disposition and the holders adjusted tax basis in the
Common Shares. Such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss and
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period for the Shares of
the Company exceeds one year.

In certain cases, a redemption of Common Shares may be treated as a
dividend, rather than as a payment in exchange for the Shares of the Company.
In such events, the redemption payment will be treated as ordinary dividend
income to the extent that such payment is made out of current or accumulated
earnings and profits, as calculated for United States federal income tax
purposes. The determination of whether the redemption will be treated as a
dividend rather than as payment in exchange for the Common Shares of the
Company will depend upon whether and to what extent the redemption reduces the
holders percentage stock ownership interest in the Company. A redemption will
be treated as an exchange of stock that produces a capital gain if the
redemption either (1) completely terminates the holders interest in the
Company under Section 302(b)(3) of the Code, (2) is substantially
disproportionate with respect to the holder under Section 302(b)(2) of the
Code, or (3) is not essentially equivalent to a dividend under Section
302(b)(1) of the Code.

A redemption will completely terminate the holders interest in the
Company as a result of the redemption if, as a result of the redemption, the
holder no longer has any stock interest in the Company, directly or
constructively after application of the attribution rules of Section 302(c) of
the Code. A redemption will be substantially disproportionate with respect to
the holder if (1) the ratio of the voting stock owned by the holder (including
stock attributed to the holder under Section 302(c) of the Code) immediately
after the redemption to all the voting stock of the Company is less than 80% of
the same ratio for the voting stock owned by the holder immediately before the
redemption, (2) there is a similar percentage reduction in the ownership by the
holder of Common Shares of the Company, and (3) the holder owns less than 50%
of the voting stock of the Company. Whether a redemption is not essentially
equivalent to a dividend with respect to a holder will depend upon the
holders particular circumstances. The IRS has ruled that a minority
shareholder in a publicly held corporation whose relative stock interest is
minimal and who exercises no control with respect to corporate affairs is
considered to have a meaningful reduction if such shareholder has a reduction
in his percentage stock ownership. In determining whether any of the foregoing
tests have been satisfied, the holder is deemed, under the constructive
ownership rules of Section 302(c) of the Code, to own any Common Shares in the
Company owned by certain related persons and entities and any Common Shares
which the holder or certain related persons and entities have an option to
acquire. However, because of the ambiguities in applying the foregoing rules,
holders should consult their tax advisors to determine whether a redemption of
Common Shares will be treated as a dividend or as a payment in exchange for the
Common Shares of the Company.

Page 39



---



##### Table of Contents



F.  DIVIDENDS AND PAYING AGENTS.

Not Applicable.

G.  STATEMENT BY EXPERTS.

Not Applicable.

H.  DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY.

The Company is subject to the informational requirements for foreign
private issuers under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In
accordance with these requirements, the Company files reports on Form 20-F and
6-K with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. These materials,
including this annual report and the exhibits thereto, may be inspected and
copied at the Commissions Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of the materials may be obtained from the Public
Reference Room at prescribed rates. The public may obtain information on the
operations of the Commissions Public Reference Room by calling the Commission
in the United States at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission also maintains
a web site at http://sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and other
information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission.

I.  SUBSIDIARY INFORMATION.

Not Applicable.




ITEM 11.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

INTEREST RATE RISK.

The Company does not have any outstanding debt with adjustable interest
rates. As a result, the Company will not have any significant exposure to
changes in interest rates.

IMPACT OF CURRENCY FLUCTUATIONS.

The Companys operating expenses are primarily paid in Canadian dollars.
Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Canadian dollar and such other
currencies may have a material effect on the Companys results of operations.
In particular, the Company may be adversely affected by a significant
strengthening of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar and the Czech
Republic koruna. The Company has not previously engaged in, and does not now
intend to enter into, any currency hedging or other similar currency hedging
transactions. The Company may enter into such transactions on a non-speculative
basis to the extent that it might in the future have substantial foreign
currency exposure.




ITEM 12.  DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES.

Not Applicable.

Page 40



---



##### Table of Contents






PART II.




ITEM 13.  DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES.

None.




ITEM 14.  MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.




ITEM 15.  [RESERVED.]




ITEM 16.  [RESERVED.]




PART III.




ITEM 17.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

See Item 18 below for Financial Statements filed as part of this Report.




ITEM 18.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The following documents are filed as Attachment A hereto and are included
as part of this Amendment Number 1 to Form 20-F.

ASTRIS ENERGI INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Description of Document:

| |                                                                                           
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Auditors Report for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999.                          
|
| | Consolidated Balance Sheets for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999.                
|
| | Consolidated Statement of Earning and Loss for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999.
|
| | Consolidated Statement of Cash Flow for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999.       
|
| | Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2000 and 1999. 




ITEM 19.  EXHIBITS.

The following exhibits were previously filed and are included as part of this
Form 20-F.

|     |  |                                                                                                                                                 
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3.1* |  | Memorandum of Association of Kayty Exploration Ltd., filed March 18,
1981 with the Province of Alberta Office of Consumer and Corporate
Affairs.
|3.2* |  | Articles of Association of Kayty Exploration Ltd., filed March 18,
1981 with the Province of Alberta Office of Consumer and Corporate
Affairs.  

Page 41



---



##### Table of Contents



|      |  |                                                                                                                                                                            
|----- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|3.3*  |  | Certificate amending the Memorandum of Association of Kayty
Exploration Ltd., filed July 9, 1981 with the Province of Alberta
Office of Consumer and Corporate Affairs.    
|3.4*  |  | Certificate amending the Memorandum of Association of Kayty
Exploration Ltd., filed November 6, 1981 with the Province of Alberta
Office of Consumer and Corporate Affairs.
|3.5*  |  | Certificate amending the Memorandum of Association of Kayty
Exploration Ltd., filed March 11, 1982 with the Province of Alberta
Office of Consumer and Corporate Affairs.  
|3.6*  |  | Certificate amending the Memorandum of Association of Kayty
Exploration Ltd., filed August 9, 1982 with the Province of Alberta
Office of Consumer and Corporate Affairs.  
|3.7*  |  | Articles of Continuance for Kayty Exploration Ltd., filed September
22, 1987 with the Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations,
Province of Ontario, Canada.          
|3.8*  |  | Articles of Amendment for Kayty Inc., filed December 7, 1994 with the
Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations, Province of Ontario,
Canada.                          
|3.9*  |  | Articles of Amendment for WLD Inc., filed July 4, 1995 with the
Ministry of Consumer and Commercial Relations, Province of Ontario,
Canada.                                
|3.10* |  | By-Laws of Astris Energi Inc., dated April 12, 1996.                                                                                                                       
|4.*   |  | Astris Energi Inc. Stock Option Plan, dated June 2000.                                                                                                                     
|10.1* |  | License Agreement between Astris Energi Inc. and Energy Ventures Inc.
(Canada) dated October 22, 1998.                                                                     
|10.2* |  | Debenture by Astris Energi Inc and Astris Inc. to and in favor of
Energy Ventures Inc. (Canada) dated October 22, 1998.                                                    
|10.3* |  | Equipment Lease between Astris Energi Inc. and Astris Inc. and Energy
Ventures Inc. (Canada) dated October 22, 1998.                                                       
|10.4* |  | License Agreement with Macnor Corp. dated October 1, 1999.                                                                                                                 
|10.5* |  | Lease for property located at 2175 Dunwin Drive, Unit 6, Mississauga,
Ontario, between 789542 Ontario Limited and Astris Energi Inc., dated
April 14, 2000.                
|10.6* |  | License Agreement, between Astris Inc. and Astris s.r.o., dated
January 30, 1995.                                                                                          
|10.7* |  | Grant of Options by Astris Energi Inc. to Energy Ventures Inc., dated
October 22, 1998.                                                                                    

Page 42



---



##### Table of Contents



|       |  |                                                                                                                                  
|------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.8*  |  | Agreement between Astris Energi Inc. and Fuelcellstore.com, Inc.,
dated October 12, 2000.                                        
|10.9*  |  | Assignment Agreement between Josef Soltys and Astris Inc. for
Canadian Patent #1,295,679, for QUICKCELL, dated November 15, 1995.
|10.10* |  | Debenture between Astris Inc. and Donald Alex Blenkarn, in trust,
dated September 30, 1996.                                      
|10.11  |  | Contract between Astris Energi, Inc. and Molesworth Associates, Inc.
dated March 9, 2000.                                        
|21.*   |  | Subsidiaries.                                                                                                                    



---

|* |  | These exhibits all are incorporated by reference to exhibits filed under
the respective exhibit numbers in the Form 20-F, and as amended, filed as
a Registration Statement.
|- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




SIGNATURES

The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for
filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused and authorized the undersigned
to sign this annual report on its behalf.

| |  |     |  |                                                        
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
| |  |     |  | ASTRIS ENERGI INC.                                     
|
| |  | By: |  | /s/   Jiri K. Nor
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |     |  | Date:
October 1, 2001                                  

Page 43



---



##### Table of Contents





| | ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian Dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



AUDITORS REPORT

To the Shareholders of
Astris Energi Inc.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Astris Energi Inc. as at
December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the consolidated statements of loss and deficit
and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with United States and Canadian generally
accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform
an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.

The Companys ability to continue as a going concern is in substantial doubt
and is dependent upon the success of the efforts of its directors and principal
shareholders in providing financial support in the short term, the success of
the Company in raising additional long-term financing either from their own
resources or from third parties, the successful commercialization of one or
more of the Companys research projects and the Company attaining profitable
operations.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31,
2000 and 1999 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years
then ended in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

The 1999 year was reported on by another accountant.

All figures are in Canadian dollars.

| |  |     |  |                                        
| |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ |  | Lugowy Associates
CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

Hamilton, Ontario
April 30, 2001

F-1



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Canadian dollars)

|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |         | 
|-------------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | ---- | ---------- | ------- |  | - | ---------- | ------- | 
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   | (restated)
|December 31                            |                                   | 2000 |            | 1999   
|                                       |                                   |      |            |        
|ASSETS                                 |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|Current                                |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       | Cash                              |      | $          | 16,262  |  |   | $          | 4,854   | 
|                                       | Receivables                       |      |            | 48,692  |  |   |            | 42,810  | 
|                                       | Prepaid expenses and deposits     |      |            | 34,696  |  |   |            |         | 
|                                       | Marketable security (Note 3)      |      |            | 51,450  |  |   |            | 49,999  | 
|                                       | Investment tax credits refundable |      |            | 61,000  |  |   |            |         | 
|                                       | Deferred costs (Note 10)          |      |            | 64,303  |  |   |            |         | 
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       |                                   |      | 276,403    |         |  |   | 97,663     |        
|Long term investment (Note 3)          |                                   |      |            |         |  |   | 49,999     |        
|Capital assets (Note 4)                |                                   |      | 5,302      |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       |                                   | $    | 281,705    |         |  | $ | 147,662    |        
|LIABILITIES                            |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|Current                                |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       | Payables and accruals (Note 6)    |      | $          | 393,102 |  |   | $          | 494,203 | 
|                                       | Goods and Services Tax payable    |      |            | 24,473  |  |   |            | 42,810  | 
|                                       | Notes payable (Note 5)            |      |            |         |  |   |            | 24,357  | 
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       |                                   |      | 417,575    |         |  |   | 561,370    |        
|Advances from related parties (Note 6) |                                   |      | 417,287    |         |  |   | 452,491    |        
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       |                                   |      | 834,862    |         |  |   | 1,013,861  |        
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|SHAREHOLDERS DEFICIENCY               |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|Share capital (Note 8)                 |                                   |      | 1,435,298  |         |  |   | 1,086,676  |        
|Deficit                                |                                   |      | (1,988,455 | )       |  |   | (1,952,875 | )      
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       |                                   |      | (553,157   | )       |  |   | (866,199   | )      
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        
|                                       |                                   | $    | 281,705    |         |  | $ | 147,662    |        
|                                       |                                   |      |            |         |  |   |            |        

Basis of presentation (Note 1)
Contingency (Note 11)

Approved on behalf of the Board:

|               |  |                        
|-------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/   Jiri Nor |  | /s/   Gordon T. Emerson
|President      |  | Treasurer              

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF LOSS AND DEFICIT
(Canadian dollars)

|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |        | 
|------------------------------ | ----------------------------------- | ---- | ---------- | ------- |  | - | ---------- | ------ | 
|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   | (restated)
|Years ended December 31        |                                     | 2000 |            | 1999   
|                               |                                     |      |            |        
|REVENUE                        |                                     | $    | 22,824     |         |  | $ | 21,919     |       
|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |       
|EXPENSES                       |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |       
|                               | Subcontract (Note 6)                |      |            | 180,807 |  |   |            | 32,782 | 
|                               | General and administrative          |      |            | 173,155 |  |   |            | 7,343  | 
|                               | Professional fees                   |      |            | 64,054  |  |   |            | 10,325 | 
|                               | Interest (Note 6)                   |      |            | 15,455  |  |   |            | 12,135 | 
|                               | Amortization                        |      |            | 1,581   |  |   |            |        | 
|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |       
|                               |                                     |      | 435,052    |         |  |   | 62,585     |       
|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |       
|Net loss before the following  |                                     |      | (412,228   | )       |  |   | (40,666    | )     
|                               | Gain on sale of marketable security |      |            | 376,648 |  |   |            |        | 
|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |       
|Net loss for the year          |                                     |      | (35,580    | )       |  |   | (40,666    | )     
|Deficit, beginning of year     |                                     |      | (1,952,875 | )       |  |   | (1,912,209 | )     
|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |       
|Deficit, end of year           |                                     | $    | (1,988,455 | )       |  | $ | (1,952,875 | )     
|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |       
|Loss per common share (Note 8) |                                     | $    | (0.003     | )       |  | $ | (0.004     | )     
|                               |                                     |      |            |         |  |   |            |       

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Canadian dollars)

|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |   | 
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------ | ---- | -------- | ------ |  | - | ---------- | - | 
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   | (restated)
|Years ended December 31                                                        |                                                              | 2000 |          | 1999  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |       
|OPERATING                                                                      |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|Net loss for the year                                                          |                                                              | $    | (35,580  | )      |  | $ | (40,666    | )
|Items not requiring cash                                                       |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|                                                                               | - amortization                                               |      |          | 1,581  |  |   |            |   | 
|                                                                               | - consulting fees paid in capital stock to
non-related party |      |          | 21,000 |  |   |            |   | 
|                                                                               | - consulting fees paid in capital stock to
related party     |      |          | 50,000 |  |   |            |   | 
|Gain on sale of marketable security                                            |                                                              |      | (376,648 | )      |  |   |            |  
|Net change in non-cash working capital balances
related to operations (Note 9) |                                                              |      | (67,361  | )      |  |   | 27,810     |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      | (407,008 | )      |  |   | (12,856    | )
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|INVESTING                                                                      |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|Proceeds on sale of marketable security                                        |                                                              |      | 425,196  |        |  |   |            |  
|Purchase of capital assets                                                     |                                                              |      | (6,883   | )      |  |   |            |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      | 418,313  |        |  |   |            |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|FINANCING                                                                      |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|Issuance of common shares                                                      |                                                              |      | 103      |        |  |   |            |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      | 103      |        |  |   |            |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|Net increase (decrease) in cash during the year                                |                                                              |      | 11,408   |        |  |   | (12,856    | )
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|Cash, beginning of year                                                        |                                                              |      | 4,854    |        |  |   | 17,710     |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  
|Cash, end of year                                                              |                                                              | $    | 16,262   |        |  | $ | 4,854      |  
|                                                                               |                                                              |      |          |        |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

These consolidated financial statements reflect the accounts of Astris Energi
Inc. (the Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Astris Inc., which was
acquired on December 31, 1995. The Company is dedicated to the research and
development of alternative energy sources. The Company has incurred several
years of losses and as at December 31, 2000 has a shareholders deficiency of
approximately $553,000.

The consolidated 2000 and 1999 financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada on a going
concern basis which presumes the realization of assets and the discharge of
liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future.

The Companys ability to continue as a going concern is in substantial doubt
and is dependent upon the success of the efforts of its directors and principal
shareholders in providing financial support in the short term, the success of
the Company in raising additional long-term financing either from their own
resources or from third parties, the successful commercialization of one or
more of the Companys research projects and the Company achieving profitable
operations.

The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted at this time. These
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts
and classifications of assets and liabilities that might be necessary should
the Company be unable to continue in business.

These consolidated financial statements also conform to U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles and no reconciliation between Canadian and U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles is required, except as noted in the second
paragraph of the revenue recognition section of Note 2.

2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
REVENUE RECOGNITION

Revenue is recognized at
point of sale when goods are shipped and title passes.
In cases where consulting services are provided, revenue is recognized upon
completion of the service provision.

A royalty was received in 1998 from the company referred to in Note 3 in the
amount of $25,000. Originally the amount was accounted for as revenue in 1998.
Subsequently, a change was made to reflect $4,750 as revenue and $20,250 as
deferred revenue in 1998 and $20,250 as revenue in 1999. This change is based
on the fact that the royalty was for the period from October 1998 through to
December 1999 and, therefore, was pro-rated between the years based on the
number of months in each year.

F-5



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

2.   SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD.)

This treatment now complies with Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles.

Revenue recognition in these consolidated financial statements is not
consistent with U.S. GAAP. Under U.S. GAAP, the initial payment received at the
beginning of a contract, not attributable to any specific provision of goods or
services, must be pro-rated over the life of the contract. Accordingly,
regarding the ten-year license agreement between the Company and Energy
Ventures Inc. (Canada), dated October 22, 1998, wherein an initial payment of
$25,000 was received by the Company on October 22, 1998, annual allocations of
$2,500 would be required to be made to income.

The following is a tabulation of comparative numbers under Canadian and U.S.
GAAP:

|                         |  |               |         |           |  |      |         |      |  |   |         |  |  |   |         | 
|------------------------ |  | ------------- | ------- | --------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- |  |  | - | ------- | 
|                         |  | Canadian GAAP |         | U.S. GAAP
|                         |  |               |         |          
|                         |  | 2000          |         | 1999      |  | 2000 |         | 1999
|                         |  |               |         |           |  |      |         |     
|Royalty income           |  | $             | 10,000  |           |  | $    | 20,250  |      |  | $ | 12,500  |  |  | $ | 2,500   | 
|                         |  |               |         |           |  |      |         |      |  |   |         |  |  |   |         | 
|Shareholders deficiency |  | $             | 553,157 |           |  | $    | 866,199 |      |  | $ | 572,740 |  |  | $ | 888,282 | 
|                         |  |               |         |           |  |      |         |      |  |   |         |  |  |   |         | 

DEVELOPMENT COSTS AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH

All costs relating to scientific research, development and product
evaluation
are expensed as incurred. Investment tax credits and government grants received
toward these costs are netted against the related expenses. As there has been
uncertainty concerning recovery of investment tax credits, they are recognized
upon notification by regulatory bodies.

TAXES PAYABLE

The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under
this method, income taxes reflect the future income tax consequences of
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and income tax
bases of assets, liabilities, loss carryforwards and tax credits.

Goods and Services Tax is an amount payable in respect of federal commodity tax
which was instituted in Canada in 1991. The amount became payable upon the sale
of the Companys assets (see Note 3).

F-6



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the year. Actual amounts
could differ from those estimates.

2.  SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTD.)

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The fair value
of financial instruments contained in these consolidated financial statements
approximates book value unless otherwise indicated.

The financial risk is the risk to the Companys earnings that arises from
fluctuations in interest rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. The
Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to interest
risk.

The Company is exposed to credit risk on the accounts receivable from its
customers. In order to reduce its credit risk, the Company has adopted credit
policies, which include the analysis of the financial position of its customers
and the regular review of their credit limit.

LOSS PER SHARE

Basic loss per share is calculated on the weighted average number of shares
outstanding during the year.

3.  LONG TERM INVESTMENT

During 1998, all capital assets were sold to a public company (Energy Ventures
Inc. (Canada)) in return for 200,000 shares of that company. As there was not
an active market for the shares of the public company, the shares were valued
at an amount equivalent to the net book value of the capital assets. There was
a legend on the share certificates restricting sale of the share for a period
of one year from October 1998 and one-half of the shares for a further year
from October 1999, by reason of Rule 144 under the Securities Act. The shares
which can (could) be sold are (were) disclosed as a marketable security. The
market value of these shares at December 31, 2000 and December 31, 1999 is not
readily determinable as the shares are not regularly traded.

The value of the shares was corrected in 1998 from the original valuation of
$694,485 to $100,000 on the previously issued financial statements. As a
result, the gain previously recorded at $594,487 was reduced to nil.

F-7



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

3.  LONG TERM INVESTMENT (CONT)

The per share effect of this writedown was $0.056 per share.The Company sold
97,100 shares for proceeds of $425,196 up to December 31, 2000, yielding a gain
on sale of $376,648. Number of shares on hand at December 31, 2000 was 102,900
(1999: 200,000).

4.  CAPITAL ASSETS

|                               |  |      |       |              |  |             |       |          |  |          |       |      |  |   |  | 
|------------------------------ |  | ---- | ----- | ------------ |  | ----------- | ----- | -------- |  | -------- | ----- | ---- |  | - |  | 
|                               |  |      |       |              |  |             |       |          |  | 2000     |       | 1999
|                               |  |      |       |              |  | Accumulated |       | Net Book |  | Net Book
|                               |  | Cost |       | Amortization |  | Value       |       | Value   
|                               |  |      |       |              |  |             |       |         
|Office furniture and equipment |  | $    | 6,883 |              |  | $           | 1,581 |          |  | $        | 5,302 |      |  | $ |  | 
|                               |  |      |       |              |  |             |       |          |  |          |       |      |  |   |  | 
|                               |  | $    | 6,883 |              |  | $           | 1,581 |          |  | $        | 5,302 |      |  | $ |  | 
|                               |  |      |       |              |  |             |       |          |  |          |       |      |  |   |  | 

5.  NOTES PAYABLE

The notes payable were held by three shareholders and were unsecured, interest
free and due on demand. The notes were paid off in the year by issuance of the
Companys capital stock. (Please also see Note 8.)

6.  ADVANCES FROM RELATED PARTIES

The following amounts have been advanced from
related parties:

|                                                                                   |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | 
|                                                                                   |  | 2000 |         | 1999
|                                                                                   |  |      |         |     
|Due to a shareholder                                                               |  | $    | 315,287 |      |  | $ | 315,287 | 
|Due to Timagami Financial Services, a company
controlled by a director and officer |  |      | 2,000   |      |  |   | 37,204  | 
|Debenture due to shareholders                                                      |  |      | 100,000 |      |  |   | 100,000 | 
|                                                                                   |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 
|                                                                                   |  | $    | 417,287 |      |  | $ | 452,491 | 
|                                                                                   |  |      |         |      |  |   |         | 

DUE TO A SHAREHOLDER

With respect to the amount due to a shareholder, the amount has arisen
primarily as a result of the recognition of amounts subject to reimbursement to
the shareholder for expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. These amounts
are to be reimbursed only if external financing amounting to $5,000,000 (U.S.)
has been raised by the shareholder (see Notes 11 and 12).

F-8



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

6. ADVANCES FROM RELATED PARTIES (CONTD.)

DUE TO TIMAGAMI FINANCIAL SERVICES

These advances are unsecured and bear interest at 12% per annum to December 31,
1998 only. Unpaid interest is accrued to December 31, 1998, totaling
approximately $12,400 and is included in payables and accruals. $35,204 was
repaid in the year by issuance of the Companys capital stock. (Please also see
Note 8.) The balance is shown as a long-term liability as there are no specific
terms or repayment and the holder of the debt has indicated that this amount
will not be requested for repayment prior to July 7, 2002.

DEBENTURE DUE TO A SHAREHOLDER

The debenture due to shareholders is secured and bears interest at 12% per
annum. Unpaid interest, accrued to December 31, 2000, totaling approximately
$54,000, is included in payables and accruals. Although the Company is in
technical default of its debenture agreement as a result of the interest
payments being in arrears, there are no specific terms of repayment and the
debenture holders have indicated that they will not demand repayment until
after July 7, 2002. Accordingly, the amount payable under the debenture has
been classified as a long-term liability. The debenture is collateralized by a
fixed and floating charge on all of the assets and business of Astris Inc.

PAYABLES AND ACCRUALS

The Company has a 30% ownership interest in Astris S.R.O.,
a Czech company, in which the remaining 70% is owned by a company owned by a
shareholder of the
Company (Macnor Inc.). The Companys 30% interest in losses of Astris S.R.O.
has been applied to its investment. This investment is accounted for on the
equity basis. As the Companys share of losses is in excess of the original
investment, the investment has been written off to nil in a prior year. The
balance owing to Astris S.R.O. at December 31, 2000 is $ Nil (1999: $50,637).

In addition, payables include the following amounts:



| |  | $10,450 owing to Crawford Associates, owned by a shareholder for consulting
fees, (1999  $25,787).
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 
| |  | $36,000 owing to Jiri Nor, a shareholder, for consulting fees, (1999 -
$90,000).                   

During 2000, the following amounts were expensed as consulting fees to
shareholders:

|            |  |   |        |  |  |                  |  | 
|----------- |  | - | ------ |  |  | ---------------- |  | 
|J. Nor      |  | $ | 90,000 |  |  | (1999 - $ Nil)  
|G. Crawford |  | $ | 10,450 |  |  | (1999 - $ Nil)  
|G. Emerson  |  | $ | 72,500 |  |  | (1999 - $ Nil)  
|D. Clewes   |  | $ | Nil    |  |  | (1999 - $52,087)

F-9



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

6.  ADVANCES FROM RELATED PARTIES (CONTD.)

During 2000, the following amounts were expensed as interest to shareholders:

|            |  |   |       |  |  |  |                |  
|----------- |  | - | ----- |  |  |  | -------------- | -
|J. Nor      |  | $ | 5,114 |  |  |  | (1999 - $4,800 | )
|D. Blenkarn |  | $ | 7,798 |  |  |  | (1999 - $4,800 | )
|G. Crawford |  | $ | 2,543 |  |  |  | (1999 - $2,400 | )

During the previous year the Company signed an agreement with a company owned
by one of the shareholders (Macnor Inc.) under which Macnor would open a
website for Astris and market some of Astris products. Astris will receive 5%
of any recorded sales. Such sales occurred in the year ended December 31, 2000
in the amount of $431 (1999: $ Nil) and, accordingly, have been included in the
Companys accounts.

7.  INCOME TAXES

The Company has refundable investment tax credits of approximately $61,000
relating to expenditures on scientific research and tax loss carryforwards of
approximately $2,053,000. If unused, the tax losses will expire as follows:

|     |  |   |           | 
|---- |  | - | --------- | 
|2007 |  | $ | 35,000    | 
|2006 |  | $ | 61,000    | 
|2004 |  | $ | 34,000    | 
|2003 |  | $ | 1,856,000 | 
|2002 |  | $ | 67,000    | 

The potential income tax benefit arising from loss carryforwards has not been
reflected in these consolidated financial statements. The Company will
determine its income tax on the liability method when it is in a taxable
position.

During 2000 and 1999, the Company received or received notification of
investment tax credit refunds of $61,000 and $19,305, respectively, which are
netted against subcontract expense.

8.  SHARE CAPITAL

Share capital consists of the following:

AUTHORIZED:

60,000,000 common shares
10,000,000 preferred shares

F-10



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

8.  SHARE CAPITAL (CONTD)

ISSUED AND OUTSTANDING:

|                                     |  |                                                                   |            |               |            |   |           |  |           | 
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------------- | ---------- | - | --------- |  | --------- | 
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            | Common Shares
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            |              
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            | #             |            | $
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            |               |            |  
|Issued as at December 31, 1998       |  |                                                                   | 10,188,556 |               |            |   | 1,049,301 | 
|To be issued as at December 31, 1998 |  |                                                                   | 455,000    |               |            |   | 37,375    | 
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            |               |            |   |           |  |           | 
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            |               | 10,643,556 |   |           |  | 1,086,676 | 
|March 9, 2000                        |  | - Issued in exchange for consulting fees from a non-related party |            |               | 62,500     |   |           |  | 10,500    | 
|June 9, 2000                         |  | - Issued in exchange for consulting fees from a non-related party |            |               | 18,750     |   |           |  | 10,500    | 
|June 22, 2000                        |  | - Issued in exchange for consulting fees from a related party     |            |               | 200,000    |   |           |  | 50,000    | 
|June 22, 2000                        |  | - Issued for cash on exercise of warrants                         |            |               | 102,900    |   |           |  | 103       | 
|June 22, 2000                        |  | - Issued in exchange for outstanding liabilities                  |            |               | 1,110,078  |   |           |  | 277,519   | 
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            |               |            |   |           |  |           | 
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            |               | 12,137,784 |   |           |  | 1,435,298 | 
|                                     |  |                                                                   |            |               |            |   |           |  |           | 

No preferred shares have been issued.

At December 31, 2000, the Company had issued capital stock comprising
11,682,784 common shares (1999: 10,188,556 common shares). However, 455,000
common shares are to be issued to shareholders of a predecessor company. These
shareholders will be issued common shares in the Company if and when they
present their share certificates in the predecessor company to the registrar.

The loss per share calculations were based on a weighted average of 11,446,010
issued and outstanding common shares for 2000 and 10,643,556 issued and
outstanding common shares for 1999.

During 1998, an option was granted to the public company which purchased the
capital assets (see Note 3), to purchase 1,000,000 common shares of the Company
at $0.30 (U.S.) per share. The option will expire on October 22, 2003.

F-11



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

8. SHARE CAPITAL (CONTD)

On March 8, 2000, the Board of Directors passed a resolution authorizing a
stock option plan. The plan was adopted by the Companys shareholders at its
annual and special meeting of shareholders in August 2000. The plan consists of
1,000,000 common shares for granting to its officers, directors, employees and
consultants. The exercise price shall not be less than the market price
prevailing at date of grant and, if the market price is not available, the
Board will determine a fair market value on the day preceding the date of
grant. The term of the option will be determined by the Board at time of grant,
but may not exceed five years.

At December 31, 2000, options for purchase of 675,000 common shares had been
granted under the plan to employees at prices ranging from $0.25 (Canadian) to
$0.50 (U.S.) and expiring in March and August 2005.

9. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

The net change in non-cash operating working capital balances consists of the
following:

|                                              |  |      |         |      |  |   |         |  
|--------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- |  | - | ------- | -
|                                              |  | 2000 |         | 1999
|                                              |  |      |         |     
|Decrease (increase) in receivables            |  | $    | (5,882  | )    |  | $ | 4,861   |  
|Increase in prepaid expenses                  |  |      | (34,696 | )    |  |   |         |  
|Increase in investment tax credits refundable |  |      |         |      |  |   | (61,000 | )
|Increase in deferred costs                    |  |      | (64,303 | )    |  |   |         |  
|Increase in payables and accruals             |  |      | 116,857 |      |  |   | 48,060  |  
|Decrease in Goods and Services Tax payable    |  |      | (18,337 | )    |  |   | (4,861  | )
|Decrease in deferred revenue                  |  |      |         |      |  |   | (20,250 | )
|                                              |  |      |         |      |  |   |         |  
|                                              |  | $    | (67,361 | )    |  | $ | 27,810  |  

10. DEFERRED COSTS

In September, 2000, the Company filed a registration statement with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission in order to become eligible for
trading its shares on the OTC Bulletin Board Service. Approval therefore was
received on April 17, 2001.

Costs incurred in the filing and subsequent receipt of the approval, are
deferred with a view to applying these costs against funds generated from
future sales of the Companys capital stock.

Such costs accumulated to December 31, 2000, amounted to $64,303.

F-12



---



##### Table of Contents



ASTRIS ENERGI INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Canadian dollars)
December 31, 2000 and 1999

11. CONTINGENCY

During 1999 a shareholder initiated legal claim against the Company for
repayment of advances and expenses in the amount of $315,287. Management feels
this advance is not repayable unless certain external financing is raised.
Since this has not been achieved, management feels there is no requirement to
repay the advance. No further cash payments are anticipated beyond the possible
repayment of these advances and related legal fees.

12. SUBSEQUENT EVENT

Subsequent to the year-end in February 2001, the shareholder mentioned above in
Note 11 has given notice to the Company of his intention to increase his claim
by $1,627,301 to cover additional expenses he allegedly incurred on behalf of
the Company. The Company believes that this additional claim is frivolous and
without merit.

F-13