alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARIES OF WEIDER NUTRITION INTERNATIONAL, INC.

|Entity Name                                  |  | State or Country
of Incorporation |  | Parent Corporation                                       
|-------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|Weider Nutrition Group, Inc.                 |  | Utah                              |  | Weider Nutrition International, Inc.                     
|WNG Holdings (International) Ltd.            |  | Nevada                            |  | Weider Nutrition Group, Inc.                             
|Weider Nutrition Group (Canada) Ltd.         |  | Canada (Nova Scotia)              |  | WNG Holdings (International) Ltd.                        
|Weider Nutrition (WNI) Ltd.                  |  | United Kingdom (England)          |  | WNG Holdings (International) Ltd.                        
|Weider Nutrition Group Limited               |  | United Kingdom (England)          |  | Weider Nutrition (WNI) Ltd.                              
|Weider Nutrition BV                          |  | The Netherlands                   |  | Weider Nutrition (WNI) Ltd.                              
|Weider Nutrition Limited                     |  | United Kingdom (England)          |  | Weider Nutrition BV                                      
|Weider Fitness SARL                          |  | France                            |  | Weider Nutrition BV                                      
|Weider Nutrition SL                          |  | Spain                             |  | Weider Nutrition BV                                      
|Weider Nutrition Italia SrL                  |  | Italy                             |  | Weider Nutrition BV                                      
|Weider Nutrition GmbH                        |  | Germany                           |  | Weider Nutrition BV                                      
|Aktivkost GmbH                               |  | Germany                           |  | Weider Nutrition GmbH                                    
|Food-Tech Handelsgesellschaft mbH            |  | Germany                           |  | Weider Nutrition GmbH                                    
|HPH Hamburger Pharma Handelsgesellschaft mbH |  | Germany                           |  | Weider Nutrition GmbH                                    
|Haleko Management GmbH                       |  | Germany                           |  | Weider Nutrition GmbH                                    
|Haleko Hanseatisches Lebensmittelkontor OHG  |  | Germany                           |  | Weider Nutrition GmbH (99%) &
Haleko Management GmbH (1%)
|Power Gym Ltd.                               |  | United Kingdom (England)          |  | Haleko Hanseatisches
Lebensmittelkontor OHG              
|Haleko Italia SrL                            |  | Italy                             |  | Haleko Hanseatisches
Lebensmittelkontor OHG              
|Sports Direct Ltd.                           |  | United Kingdom (England)          |  | Power Gym Ltd. (50%)                                     

---

QuickLinks
# CA2014207EN.01000801.xml

| 3.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 207/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 207/8

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 207 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

---
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

____________

No. 04-2386

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee,

v.

JACINTA A. THOMAS, a/k/a JACINTA A. CRASTOUN

Defendant, Appellant

__________________

ERRATA

The opinion of this court, issued October 27, 2007, should be

amended as follows:

On page 15, line 18, replace "protected" with "protracted."
#### Hopkins v. Gilman

*B&mittitw’*— Loss *of jurisdiction.*

After tie papers in a cause decided in tliis court on appeal, together with the judgment of this court, have keen *regularly*remitted to the court helow, this court has lost jurisdiction, and cannot recall the cause for a rehearing.

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court, for *Milwaukee*County.

Tbe judgment of this court, reversing a judgment of tbe circuit court in favor of tbe plaintiff, was rendered on tbe 28th of February, 1868, and tbe opinion filed on tbe same day. See 22- Wis. 476. On tbe 13th of April following,, tbe clerk of this court remitted to tbe circuit court tbe record and papers in tbe cause. Afterward, on defendant’s motion, plaintiff was required to show cause why an order should not be made requiring the' circuit court to return to this, court said papers and record, and why defendant should not have leave to file a motion for a rehearing, and for a modification of. tbe opinion. The plaintiff now moves to discharge this order.

*J). Q. Hooker,*for tbe motion.

*J. Downer, contra.*

*513Cole, J.

Tbe rule to show cause íuust be discharged. Tbe statute requires tbe clerk to remit to tbe court from wbicb tbe appeal was taken tbe papers transmitted to tbe supreme court on tbe appeal, together with tbe judgment or decision of tbe supreme court thereon, *within thirty days*after tbe same shall have been made, unless tbe supreme court, on tbe application of either party, shall direct them to be retained for tbe purpose of a rehearing. Laws of 1861, chap. 264, § 7. Tbe *remittitur,*then, has properly issued, and tbe record has been regularly sent down to tbe court below. This court has no longer any control over tbe cause. It has lost jurisdiction over it. Tbe court below has become repossessed of tbe cause. It has been decided a number of times by this court, that when a *remitti-tur*has regularly issued, and tbe record has been sent down to tbe court below, this court has lost jurisdiction of the cause. That this ruling was in accordance with tbe authorities, tbe following cases will show: *Legg v. Overbagh,*4 Wend. 188; *Dresser v.*Brooks, 2 Comstock, 559; *Delaplaine v.*Bergen, 7 Hill, 591.

*By the Court.*— Tbe rule to show cause is discharged.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section
        302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of IMPART Media Group,
        Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2006, as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        Joseph F. Martinez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
        the
        Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
        to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:  April
                      20, 2007
                  By:
                  /s/Joseph
                      F. MartinezJoseph
                      F. MartinezChief
                      Executive Officer andChief
                      Financial Officer
 
 ______________________
 
 This
        certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016357EN.01000401.xml

| 29.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 September 2016

(2016/C 357/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1225 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 112,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4511 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,86208 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6165 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0891 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0888 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2893 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4506 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3438 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4637 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4829 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7041 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5459 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5270 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 231,76 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2492 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4911 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5160 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 533,57 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6434 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,189 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,7039 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,839 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6389 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,8177 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,5915 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1225

JPY

Japanese yen

112,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4511

GBP

Pound sterling

0,86208

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6165

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0891

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0888

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2893

RON

Romanian leu

4,4506

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3438

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4637

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4829

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7041

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5459

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5270

KRW

South Korean won

1 231,76

ZAR

South African rand

15,2492

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4911

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5160

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 533,57

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6434

PHP

Philippine peso

54,189

RUB

Russian rouble

71,7039

THB

Thai baht

38,839

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6389

MXN

Mexican peso

21,8177

INR

Indian rupee

74,5915

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. DAAA-09-02-D-0007 ) APPEARANCES FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 58465

Thomas Barrett, Esq.

ChiefSenior Counsel David Newsome, Jr., Esq.

Senior Legal Counsel E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Douglas R. Jacobson, Esq. Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

Trial Attorneys Defense Contract Management Agency Bloomington, MN ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute which is the subject ofthe appeal having been settled, the appeal is hereby dismissed with prejudice subject to reinstatement only in the event the settlement is not consummated. Any request to reinstate the subject appeal must be filed within 30 days ofthe date ofthis Order. Dated: 22 May 2017

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract AppealsI certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals in ASBCA No. 58465, Appeal ofKellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
# C_2015430EN.01000301.xml

| 22.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 430/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 430/3

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.7566 — Mondi/Walki Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 430/05)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 29 July 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between Mondi and Walki. On 15 December 2015, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.

---
# C_2015139EN.01000201.xml

| 28.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/2

---

Call for proposals under the 2015 work plan of the Bio-based Industries Public-Private Partnership

(2015/C 139/02)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the call for proposals and related activities under the 2015 work plan of the Bio-based Industries Public-Private Partnership.

Proposals are invited for the following call: H2020-BBI-JTI-2015-01

H2020-BBI-JTI-2015-01

This work plan, including deadlines and budgets for the activities, is available through the Participant Portal website (http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal) along with information on the modalities of the call and related activities, as well as guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals. All this information will be updated as necessary on the same Participant Portal.

---
Exhibit
32.01




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Sangui Biotech International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Thomas Striepe, Chief Executive Officer, and I, Joachim Fleing, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)        The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)        The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Dated: August 25,
2008   /s/
Thomas Striepe


__________________________________________


By:
Thomas Striepe


Chief
Executive Officer






Dated: August 25,
2008   /s/
Joachim Fleing
 __________________________________________
 By:
Joachim Fleing
 Chief
Financial Officer








A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit 99.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO





SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I-many, Inc. (the Company) for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, A. Leigh Powell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin F. Collins, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated:    November 18, 2002



/s/    A. Leigh PowellA. Leigh Powell Chief Executive OfficerDated:    November 18, 2002



/s/    Kevin F. CollinsKevin F. Collins Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016003EN.01000102.xml

| 7.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7837 — The Goldman Sachs Group/The Wellcome Trust)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 3/02)

On 22 December 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7837. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7837. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
June Term, 1860.

#### Webster vs. Modlin, and another.

• A judgment will not be reversed on account of the refusal of the court to grant a new trial, unless the refusal was excepted to.

Whore the record does not show that such exception was taken, the affidavit of counsel will not be received to supply the defect, especially while the judge before whom the trial was had, is living.

EEEOE to the Circuit Court for *Oalumet*County.

This action was tried in November, 1854, and the defendants had a verdict. There was a motion for a new trial, which was denied by the court, and judgment entered against the plaintiff for costs. The record does not show that any exception was taken to the overruling of the motion for a new trial. The judge before whom the cause was tried having gone out of office before auy bill of exceptions was settled, bis affidavit stating what the evidence was upon the trial, was brought to this court in lien of a bill of exceptions, but tbe affidavit doés not show that any exception was taken to the order of the court denying the motion for a new trial. The counsel for the plaintiff in error produced his own affidavit, to supply that defect.

*B. P.*Baton, for plaintiff in error.

*E. 8.*Bragg, for defendants in error.

July 30.

*By the Court,*

Paine, J.

In this case the plaintiff in error seeks to use the affidavit of the judge before whom the cause was tried, in tbe place of a bill of exceptions, the judge having gone out of office before any bill of exceptions was set-*369tied, and bolding that he was not authorized to sign one after-wards. Without determining whether this is proper tice or not, we think the judgment must be affirmed; for the only error relied on is the refusal to grant a new trial, and the judge’s affidavit does not show that any exception was taken.

The counsel for the plaintiff in error seeks to supply this defect by his own affidavit, showing that he did except. But certainly we shall not adopt the practice of trying the record upon affidavits of parties or counsel, while the judge before whom the trial was had, is living. If the affidavit of the judge can be received in'place of a bill of exceptions at all, it must show that the necessary exceptions were taken.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2007

BY: /S/ ALBERT F. CASE, JR.
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.


<PAGE>


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 30, 2007


BY:    /S/ DEBI KOKINOS
---    ----------------
Chief Financial Officer



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.