alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      31.2**

**Chief      Financial Officer Certification pursuant to **

**Section      302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

| 1.   | I                have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K 1A (Amendment No. 1)                of                Impsat Fiber Networks, Inc.; |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based                on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement                of a                material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make                the                statement made, in light of the circumstances under which such statement                were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this                report. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                  Hector                  Alonso**Hector                  Alonso****Chief                  Financial Officer** |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

MANSFIELD HELIFLIGHT, INC. 

Complainant, 

v. 

CITY OF BURLINGTON, 

VERMONT 

Respondent. 

Docket No. 16-14-06 

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT 

FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REBUTTAL 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 16.19 and 16.11(a), the City of Burlington, Vermont ("City"), 

the Respondent in the case, requests leave to file and hereby files this motion for an extension of 

time in which to file a rebuttal until Friday, January 9, 2015. 

In support of this motion, the City states as follows: 

1. On November 24, 2014, Mansfield Heliflight, Inc. ("Mansfield"), the 

Complainant in the case, filed with FAA and served on the City its reply via email. In 

accordance with Part 16 procedural rules, a "respondent may file a rebuttal within 10 days of the 

date of service of complainant's reply." 14 C.F.R. § 16.23(f). Thus, the procedural rules grant 

the City until December 4, 2014, to submit a rebuttal. 

2. The City believes that an extension of time is both necessary and appropriate "for 

a fair and complete consideration of matters before the agency." 14 C.F.R. § 16.1l(a). 
Complainant raised new issues in its reply that require careful review, consideration, and 

response. Counsel for the City has a number of preexisting commitments and, as a result of the 

upcoming holidays, additional time to coordinate the rebuttal with City and airport staff is 

needed. 

3. On Tuesday, November 25, 2014, the undersigned contacted Benjamin H. Klein, 

counsel for Complainant, who advised that Complainant does not oppose this request. 

Relief Requested 

For the foregoing reasons, the City hereby requests an extension oftime in which it may 

file its rebuttal until Friday, January 9, 2015. 

November 25,2014 

Respectfully submitted, 

~~o~/ Pablo 0. Nliesch 

Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 

1875 Eye St., N.W. 

Suite 700 

Washington, DC 20006 

Email: pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.com 

Phone: 202-879-4000 

Fax: 202-393-2866 

Attorney for the 

City of Burlington, Vermont 

2 
Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that in accordance with 14 C.F.R. §§ 16.15 and 16.13(h), I have today, the 

25th day ofNovember, 2014, caused the foregoing Unopposed Motion for Extension ofTime to 

File Rebuttal to be served electronically, on: 

Benjamin H. Klein 

The Klein Law Firm, LLC 

61 Broadway, Suite 2125 

New York, NY 10006 

bklein@thekleinfirm.com 

Attorney for Complainant 

1L~o~ Pablo 0. Niiesch
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17153-17154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07261]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

U.S.-CHINA ECONOMIC AND SECURITY REVIEW COMMISSION


Notice of Open Public Hearing; Correction

AGENCY: U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S.-China Commission published a document in the Federal 
Register on March 24, 2015, concerning notice of an open public hearing 
to be held in Washington, DC to inform production of the Commission's 
2015 Annual Report to Congress. The background section and room number 
for this meeting has changed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rickisha Berrien-Lopez, 202-624-1454.

[[Page 17154]]

Corrections

    Background: This is the fourth public hearing the Commission will 
hold during its 2015 report cycle to collect input from academic, 
industry, and government experts on national security implications of 
the U.S. bilateral trade and economic relationship with China. This 
hearing will explore the advancement of China's offensive missile 
forces--both conventional and nuclear--and security implications for 
the United States. The hearing will be co-chaired by Vice Chairman 
Dennis Shea and Commissioner Katherine Tobin Ph.D. Any interested party 
may file a written statement by April 1, 2015, by mailing to the 
contact below. A portion of each panel will include a question and 
answer period between the Commissioners and the witnesses.
    Location, Date and Time: Room SD-562, Dirksen Senate Office 
Building.

Michael Danis,
Executive Director, U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-07261 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1137-00-P
output_EmissionLocation

FacilityID SourceID LocationTypeLongitude Latitude UTMzone SourceTypeLengthx Lengthy Angle HorzDim VertDim AreaVolReleaseHgt StackHgt_mStackDiameter_m ExitGasVel_mExitGasTemp_K Elevation_mHillHeight

01017NEI8623 M_CC0001 L -85.2182 32.83271 P 0 0 0 0 30.48 1.85928 11.61288 699.2185

01017NEI8623 M_CC0002 L -85.2183 32.83279 P 0 0 0 0 38.1 1.8288 11.61288 699.2185

01017NEI8623 M_CC0003 L -85.2185 32.8328 P 0 0 0 0 30.48 1.524 11.61288 699.2185

01017NEI8623 M_FO0004 L -85.2186 32.83159 P 0 0 0 0 60.6552 4.4196 8.71728 308.702

01017NEI8623 M_FO0005 L -85.2198 32.83256 P 0 0 0 0 60.6552 5.4864 8.71728 308.702

01017NEI8623 M_OF0006 L -85.2192 32.83188 P 0 0 0 0 24.384 1.2192 7.921752 541.4565

01017NEI8623 M_OF0007 L -85.2197 32.83172 P 0 0 0 0 38.1 1.347216 7.921752 541.4565

04015NEI2AZT18199 M_CC0001 L -113.966 35.25655 P 0 0 0 0 30.48 1.271016 15.80485 403.6925

04015NEI2AZT18199 M_EF0002 L -113.965 35.25593 P 0 0 0 0 30.48 1.0668 8.232261 331.9554

04015NEI2AZT18199 M_FL0003 L -113.966 35.25589 P 0 0 0 0 41.148 1.9812 11.2275 312.3683

04021NEIAZT$12365 M_CO0001 L -111.587 32.7623 P 0 0 0 0 16.1544 0.3048 25.64384 346.9698

04021NEIAZT$12365 M_CU0002 L -111.587 32.76233 P 0 0 0 0 12.92352 0.356616 27.91178 371.9673

04021NEIAZT$12365 M_CU0003 L -111.587 32.76234 P 0 0 0 0 13.4112 0.356616 28.92721 363.3879

04021NEIAZT$12365 M_EF0004 L -111.587 32.76233 P 0 0 0 0 10.9728 0.3048 8.380198 334.8433

Page 1
#### Kern v. Klann

*601
      *William C. Robinson,*for plaintiffs.

*John N. Gazetas*and *Lee C. McCandless,*for defendants.

September 26, 1979

KIESTER, *P.J.,*

Defendant’s preliminary objections to the complaint in trespass were argued and briefs submitted to the court on February 17, 1978. This is the first opportunity the court has had to study the briefs and the law. It is defendant’s position that plaintiffs fail to state a cause of action.

The complaint avers that on September 5, 1975, Sara J. Kern, wife plaintiff, was operating her husband’s truck along Sunset Drive in Center Township when two dogs, owned by the respective defendants, dashed upon the highway. In avoiding the dogs Mrs. Kern left the highway and her vehicle struck a cement wall, causing damages to the vehicle and injuries to Mrs. Kern.

There are no cases in Pennsylvania directly in point. Elsewhere the law is sparse on a dog owner’s liability for damages from a motor vehicle accident involving the motorist’s attempt to avoid collision with a dog on the highway. See Annotation 41 A.L.R. 3d 888. In the reported cases the actions were based on statutes with vastly different provisions.

There is a statute in Pennsylvania providing for the confinement of dogs. It states:

> “It shall be unlawful for the owner or keeper of any dog to fail to keep at all times such dog either (1) confined within the premises of the owner, or (2) firmly secured by means of a collar and chain or other device so that it cannot stray beyond the *602premises on which it is secured, or (3) under the reasonable control of some person, or when engaged in lawful hunting or field training accompanied by an owner or handler.” Act of December 22, 1965, P.L. 1124, 3 P.S. §460-702.

It is the duty of the property owner to keep in proper repair the sidewalk in front of the house. The failure to maintain the sidewalk in a safe condition may result in the liability of the owner to the injured pedestrian.

The propensity of a dog like any other animal to ignore vehicular traffic on a street or highway is well known. There is probably greater danger both to pedestrians and operators of vehicles from dogs running loose on the premises than there is danger to a pedestrian from a defective front sidewalk. There is a duty on an owner to keep a dog under control. If a dog on the loose runs in front of a car and an accident results, it becomes a question for the jury to decide if the owner exercised ordinary care in controlling the dog. Did the owner of the dog under all the circumstances exercise the care of a reasonably prudent person?

On the other hand a jury must determine if plaintiff was negligent. Did plaintiff, under the circumstances, exercise reasonable care for her own safety?

Plaintiffs have stated a cause of action for damages and are entitled to a trial of the issues pleaded in the complaint.

ORDER

Now, September 26, 1979, defendant’s preliminary objections to the complaint are dismissed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KENNETH EDWARD FELIPE, JR., )

)

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1280

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed March 15, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b) (2) from the Circuit Court for 

Highlands County; Judge Peter F. Estrada.

Kenneth Edward Felipe, Jr.

Pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ, Concur.
Exhibit 10(a)



 EXHIBIT 10(a) 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 







 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Statement of
Additional Information and to the use of our reports: (1) dated April 10, 2013, with respect to the statutory-basis financial statements and schedules of Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio, and (2) dated April 22, 2013, with respect to the
financial statements of the subaccounts of the Separate Account VA U, included in Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to the Registration Statement (Form N-4, No. 333-108525) under the Securities Act of 1933 and related WRL Freedom Premier® III Variable Annuity. 
 /s/ Ernst & Young LLP 
 Des Moines, Iowa 

April 22, 2013
Order entered March 23, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00613 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF M .A.H., A CHILD On Appeal from the 417th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 417 - 51726 - 2011 

### O RDER We GRANT appellee’s March 20, 2015 second unopposed motion for extension of time to file brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than April 23, 2015

. /s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

The National Science Board's Committee on Programs and Plans (CPP) and Subcommittee on Facilities (SCF), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National Science Board business, as follows:

# DATE AND TIME:

 Friday, April 3, 2015 at 1 p.m. EDT.

# SUBJECT MATTER: 

                        Chairmen's remarks and discussion of NSF's draft response                               ( print page 17081)                            to the Decadal Survey of Ocean Sciences (DSOS) report.                    

# STATUS:

 Closed.

                        This meeting will be held by teleconference. Please refer to the National Science Board Web site                         *www.nsf.gov/​nsb*                         for additional information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status of meeting) which may be found at                         *http://www.nsf.gov/​nsb/​notices/​.*                         Point of contact for this meeting is John Veysey at                         *jveysey@nsf.gov.*

Ann Bushmiller,

Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-07467 Filed 3-27-15; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0581. CESAR CANO ESQUIVEL v. THE STATE.

Cesar Esquivel appeals from the trial court’s June 30, 2016 order denying his

Motion to Modify Sentence and Apply the Rule of Lenity. Esquivel filed both an

application for discretionary review, Case No. A17D0003, and this direct appeal,

seeking review of the same trial court order.

We denied Esquivel’s discretionary application in Case No. A17D0003 on

August 24, 2016. Because that denial was an adjudication on the merits, the doctrine

of res judicata bars this direct appeal. See Northwest Social & Civic Club, Inc. v.

Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003); Hook v. Bergen, 286 Ga. App.

258, 260-261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007). This appeal is therefore DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/28/2016

November 28, 2016
Order filed, December 01, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00862-CR

____________

JONATHAN BERRING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1516563

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 14, 2016. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Mattie Kimble, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
# C_2015265EN.01000101.xml

| 13.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 August 2015

(2015/C 265/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1155 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4624 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71490 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5815 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0864 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0760 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,21 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1889 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4132 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0965 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5128 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4467 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6500 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6847 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5652 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 310,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,2173 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1234 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5645 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 334,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5061 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,495 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,1582 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,321 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8597 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0895 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,1940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1155

JPY

Japanese yen

138,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4624

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71490

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5815

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0864

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0760

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,21

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1889

RON

Romanian leu

4,4132

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0965

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5128

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4467

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6500

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6847

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5652

KRW

South Korean won

1 310,33

ZAR

South African rand

14,2173

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1234

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5645

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 334,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5061

PHP

Philippine peso

51,495

RUB

Russian rouble

72,1582

THB

Thai baht

39,321

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8597

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0895

INR

Indian rupee

72,1940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2353 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to require dispensers of certain 

opioids to affix on the container or package thereof a clear, concise 

warning that the opioid can cause dependence, addiction, and overdose, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2021 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to require dispensers of certain opioids to affix on the container or 

package thereof a clear, concise warning that the opioid 

can cause dependence, addiction, and overdose, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lessening Addiction 

5 By Enhancing Labeling Opioids Act of 2021’’ or the 

6 ‘‘LABEL Opioids Act of 2021’’. 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2353 IS

1 SEC. 2. LESSENING ADDICTION BY ENHANCING LABELING 

2 OF OPIOIDS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 305(c) of the Controlled 

4 Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 825(c)) is amended by striking 

5 ‘‘which shall provide that the label’’ and all that follows 

6 and inserting the following: ‘‘which shall provide that— 

7 ‘‘(1) the label of a drug listed in schedule II, 

8 III, or IV shall, when dispensed to or for a patient, 

9 contain a clear, concise warning that it is a crime 

10 to transfer the drug to any person other than the 

11 patient; and 

12 ‘‘(2) the label of any container or package con13 taining an opioid listed in schedule II, III, IV, or V 

14 (other than a drug that is approved, or authorized 

15 for emergency use, by the Food and Drug Adminis16 tration for the treatment of addiction or an opioid 

17 use disorder) shall, when dispensed to or for a pa18 tient, contain a clear, concise warning that the 

19 opioid dispensed can cause dependence, addiction, 

20 and overdose.’’. 

21 (b) PROHIBITED ACT.—Section 402(a)(3) of the 

22 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 842(a)(3)) is 

23 amended by inserting ‘‘or dispense’’ after ‘‘distribute’’. 

24 (c) REGULATIONS.— 

25 (1) REGULATIONS.—Not later than 1 year after 

26 the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2353 IS

1 Health and Human Services shall prescribe final 

2 regulations to implement the amendments made by 

3 subsections (a) and (b), which regulations shall be 

4 effective beginning on the date that is 2 years after 

5 the date of enactment of this Act. 

6 (2) INTERIM RULES.—The Secretary of Health 

7 and Human Services may issue the regulations re8 quired under paragraph (1) by interim rule to the 

9 extent necessary to comply with the timing require10 ment in that paragraph. 

11 (d) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub12 section (b) applies beginning on the date that is 2 years 

13 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSKJLVW7X2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report") of Pinnacle Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company"),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the
undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.

/s/ Robert B. Nolen, Jr.
----------------------------------------------------
Robert B. Nolen, Jr., Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2005
(Date)

      A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The
information furnished herein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed
incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933.