alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50787

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAMIEN BRYANT,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 1:11-CR-52-1

Before JONES, OWEN, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Damien Bryant has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th

Cir. 2011). Bryant has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

counsel’s assessmentthat the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate

review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 18, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50787 Document: 00512278668 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
No. 12-50787

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-50787 Document: 00512278668 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/18/2013
#### Reynolds Street Sewer

(No. 2).

October 7, 1907 :

Opinion by

Henderson, J.,

The appellants own property affected by a sewer constructed by the city of Pittsburg on Reynolds street and other intersecting streets as provided for in an ordinance approved October 2, 1900. The present appeal was heard in connection with that of Joseph Woodwell at No. 5, April Term, 1907, in which an opinion has this day been filed, ante, p. 209. The conclusion in that case was adverse to the appellant’s contention. For the reasons there given the assignments in this case are overruled and the decree affirmed.
# C_2014432EN.01000601.xml

| 2.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 432/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 432/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

1 December 2014

(2014/C 432/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2469 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4401 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79270 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2562 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2028 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,626 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,43 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1782 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4335 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7673 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4681 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4213 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6691 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5838 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6285 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 381,40 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,7542 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6742 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6758 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 317,53 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2720 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,869 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 65,2758 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,958 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1991 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3472 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,3564 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2469

JPY

Japanese yen

147,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4401

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79270

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2562

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2028

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,626

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,43

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1782

RON

Romanian leu

4,4335

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7673

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4681

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4213

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6691

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5838

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6285

KRW

South Korean won

1 381,40

ZAR

South African rand

13,7542

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6742

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6758

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 317,53

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2720

PHP

Philippine peso

55,869

RUB

Russian rouble

65,2758

THB

Thai baht

40,958

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1991

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3472

INR

Indian rupee

77,3564

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the periodic report of Corel Corporation (the    “Company”) on    Form 10-K    for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the    Securities and Exchange Commission (the    “Report”), I, David Dobson, Chief Executive    Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,    solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63,    Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of    my knowledge:     1.  The Report fully complies with the requirements of    Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities    Exchange Act of 1934; and     2.  The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the    periods indicated.     This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,    “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.     Date: February 8, 2008      By: /s/  DAVID    DOBSON    David Dobson*Chief Executive Officer*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FATS, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           2,805
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,088
<ALLOWANCES>                                       228
<INVENTORY>                                     17,854
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                47,328
<PP&E>                                           8,501
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,194
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  60,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,318
<BONDS>                                         66,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,093
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,324
<OTHER-SE>                                    (143,957)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    60,150
<SALES>                                         55,514
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,514
<CGS>                                           35,537
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   35,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                16,975
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,316
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (4,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (1,700)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (3,014)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (3,107)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.15)


</TABLE>
OPPT-2011-0941 

Sanitized: Does NOT Contain Confidential Business Information SANITIZED 

C35d-~L-\d--

Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0941 

In the January 23, 2013, 78 Fed. Reg. 4806, the EPA issued a proposed rule to promulgate a 

significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) ofTSCA for PMN P-07-204, which is 

associated with the chemical name "pentane 1,1,1,2,3,3-hexafluoro-4-(1,1,2,3,3,3-

hexafluoropropoxy)-" CAS# 870778-34-0. In the event no comments are received, EPA intends 

to codify the SNUR for P-07-204 at 40CFR 721.10509. 3M Company respectfully opposes the 

SNUR as currently written for P-07-204 and is requesting EPA modify the language ofthe 

SNUR for the following reason. 

The proposed SNUR for P-07-204 inadvertently and improperly defines as a "significant new 

use" an existing and ongoing non-exempt use of the PMN substance. 3M proposes that the 

existing commercial use as an [ ] be included as an allowed use ofP-07-204 in 

the SNUR to be codified at 40 CFR 721.10509, since such industrial use is not "new". 

The proposed SNUR for P-07-204 references the requirements of 40CFR721.80G) which defines 

as a significant new use of the PMN substance any use other than as described in the PMN with 

an additional use allowance specified as; "applies specifically to the confidential uses identified 

in the amended premanufacture notice (PMN)." 3M, however, has been commercially using the 

substance other than as described in the PMN or its amendments, specifically as an [ 

] since 2008. This commercial use was initiated after the PMN review period and after 3M filed 

its Notice of Commencement but prior to issuance of the final direct SNUR on September 21, 

2012, 77 Fed. Reg. 58666 which 3M respectfully objected to on October 22, 2012. 

[ 

] 

3M would also like to make EPA aware that several health and safety studies have been 

completed on the substance since the PMN review closed which 3M will be submitting as an FYI 

to the P-07-204 docket via CDX. 

For the foregoing reasons, 3M respectfully opposes and requests EPA to modify the language of 

the proposed SNUR for P-07-204 to accommodate all existing commercial uses of the substance. 

3M looks forward to working with the Agency to provide any additional information needed and 

to develop an appropriate SNUR proposal for P-07-204. 

11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 

63130000021/S
amended,restated, supplemented or otherwise modified, as such loan or loans may berefinanced, renewed or extended.     (d) The definition of “Permitted Lien” appearing in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreementis hereby amended (i) to insert the additional clause “(n) Liens granted in favor of theGerman Company and securing the obligations of the Borrower under the German IntercompanyLoan” immediately after clause (m) therein and (ii) to renumber the final clause in suchdefinition from “(n)” to “(o)”.     (e) Article VIII of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended to insert the followingSection 8.14 immediately following Section 8.13 appearing therein, and to renumber Sections8.14 and 8.15 as Sections “8.15” and “8.16”, respectively:     8.14 The German Company shall sell, assign, pledge, or otherwise transfer itsinterest in the German Intercompany Loan without the prior consent of the Lender orthe German Company’s security interest in the collateral pledged by the Borrower inconnection with such German Intercompany Loan shall be enforced or foreclosed upon.     2. Representations and Warranties. The Borrower hereby represents and warrants thatafter giving effect to the terms of this Amendment (i) no Default or Event of Default has occurredand is continuing and (ii) the representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreementshall be true and correct in all material respects on and as of the date hereof, as though made onand as of such date (except to the extent that such representations and warranties relate solely toan earlier date).     3. Further Assurances. The parties hereto hereby agree to undertake in good faith tonegotiate a loan and lien subordination agreement in connection with any refinancing of the GermanIntercompany Loan prior to the final maturity thereof.     4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts and bydifferent parties hereto in separate counterparts, each of which when so executed and deliveredshall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. A signature page sent to the Lender orits counsel by facsimile or other electronic means (including in portable document format (.pdf))shall be effective as an original counterpart signature.     5. Section Titles. The section titles contained in this Amendment are and shall bewithout substance, meaning or content of any kind whatsoever and are not a part of the agreementbetween the parties hereto.     6. Governing Law. The validity of this Amendment, the construction, interpretation,and enforcement hereof, and the rights of the parties hereto with respect to all matters arisinghereunder or related hereto shall be determined under, governed by, and construed in accordancewith the laws of the State of Illinois.[Signature Pages Follow]
2

 
               IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed as of the day and year first abovewritten.      **MIDWAY GAMES INC.**,
# C_2015031EN.01001301.xml

| 30.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/13

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals — GR/001/15 — Support for awareness raising activities about the value of intellectual property and the damages of counterfeiting and piracy

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 13 of 16 January 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 13 of 16 January 2015

(2015/C 31/09)

On cover page 2, in the table of contents, and on page 3, title heading:

for:

for:

‘ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

EUROPEAN COMMISSION’,

read:

read:

‘ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

OFFICE FOR HARMONIZATION IN THE INTERNAL MARKET’.

---
# C_2015084EN.01000101.xml

| 12.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7387 — BP/Statoil Fuel and Retail Aviation)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 84/01)

On 15 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7387. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7387. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016039EN.01000101.xml

| 2.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7888 — APAX/B&G/Mannai/GFI Informatique)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 39/01)

On 26 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7888. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7888. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
INTELIDATA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-16115,   No.  333-16117  and  No.  333-16121)  on  Form  S-8  of  InteliData
Technologies  Corporation of our report dated February 5, 1996,  relating to the
consolidated  statements of operations,  stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash
flows for the year ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in the December
31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-K of InteliData Technologies Corporation.


                                   /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

                                   KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

Washington, D.C.
March 31, 1998
# C_2016205EN.01000101.xml

| 9.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8012 — HAL Investments/Coolblue)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 205/01)

On 1 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8012. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8012. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 24.6**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E.Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher Kirk and eachof them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitutionand resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and to sign any or allamendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto,and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with orwithout the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and everyact and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, asfully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or theirsubstitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

 
|   | /s/  WILLIAM F. CONCANNON |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | William  F. Concannon     |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH EDWARD NEWTON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 613 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 31st day of March, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

TRACY THOMAS,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 621 EAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof, I, Yi Tong, Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.








February
11, 2010




By:
              /s/ Yi
      TongYi
      Tong, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer