alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2787 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2787

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the role of doctors 
 of podiatric medicine in the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2021

Mr. Cassidy (for himself and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to clarify the role of doctors 
 of podiatric medicine in the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ROLE OF DOCTORS OF PODIATRIC MEDICINE IN DEPARTMENT OF 
              VETERANS AFFAIRS.

    (a) Clarification of Role.--Section 7306 of title 38, United States 
Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (6), by striking ``a Director of 
                Podiatric Service,'';
                    (B) by redesignating paragraph (11) as paragraph 
                (12); and
                    (C) by inserting after paragraph (10) the following 
                new paragraph:
            ``(11) A Podiatric Medical Director, who shall be a 
        qualified doctor of podiatric medicine and who shall be 
        responsible to the Under Secretary for Health for the operation 
        of the Podiatric Service.'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by inserting ``podiatric 
        medicine,'' after ``doctors of medicine,''; and
            (3) in subsection (c), by striking ``and (8)'' and 
        inserting ``(8), and (11)''.
    (b) Clarification of Pay Grade.--Section 7404 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2), by inserting ``, podiatrists,'' 
        after ``physicians''; and
            (2) in subsection (b), in the first heading of the list 
        following the colon, by striking ``PODIATRIST'' and inserting 
        ``PODIATRIST (DPM)''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016167EN.01000501.xml

| 11.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 May 2016

(2016/C 167/06)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1395 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,39 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78998 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2730 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1053 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3330 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,022 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,05 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4142 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4905 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3446 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5544 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4743 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8455 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6746 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5572 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 337,36 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2127 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4207 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4793 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 135,96 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5854 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,832 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,1908 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,059 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9971 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4320 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,8960 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1395

JPY

Japanese yen

123,39

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78998

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2730

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1053

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3330

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,022

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,05

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4142

RON

Romanian leu

4,4905

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3446

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5544

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4743

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8455

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6746

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5572

KRW

South Korean won

1 337,36

ZAR

South African rand

17,2127

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4207

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4793

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 135,96

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5854

PHP

Philippine peso

53,832

RUB

Russian rouble

75,1908

THB

Thai baht

40,059

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9971

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4320

INR

Indian rupee

75,8960

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 96-2733EA

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United Sta tes v. * District Court for the Easter n * District of Arkansas. Jerry Dixon, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

_____________ Submitted: March 11, 1997 Filed: May 9, 1997

_____________ Before FAGG, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM. Jerry Dixon pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute cocai ne base within one thousand feet of a playground, see 21 U.S.C. § § 841(a)(1), 860(a), 846, and us ing a firearm during a drug offense, se e 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The district court sentenced Dixon t o sev enty-eight months on the drug offense and a consecutive sixt y months on the firearm offense. After the Supreme Court decide d Baileyv. United States , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995) (narrowin g def initionof “using” firearm within meaning of § 924(c)), Dixo n filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2255 mo tion to vacate his firearm sentence. The Government agreed Dixon’s firearm sentence should be vac ated in lig ht of Bailey , but argued the district court should enhanc e Dixon’s drug sentence for his possession of a firearm, see U.S . Senten cing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) (1996). The distric t court set aside Dixon’s firearm sentence, but held it lacked-2-

ju risdictionto resentence Dixon on the unchallenged dru g conviction. The Government appeals. In a case presenting the same issue and decided the same day, United States v. Harrison , No. 96-2544, slip op. at 3-4 (8th Cir. May 9, 1997), we held 28 U.S.C . § 2255 gives district courts power to e nhance an unchallenged drug sentence for firearm possessio n after vacating the defendant’s sentence for using a firearm i n violation of § 924(c). The § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement of the drug senten ce and the § 924(c) firearm conviction are interdependent . See id . Thus, to correct a § 2255 petitioner’s sentence after a successful attack on the § 924 (c) firearm conviction, the district court must revisit the drug term to consider the § 2D1.1(b)(1 ) enhancement. See id. Resentencing in these circumstances d oes not violate double jeopardy or due process. See id. at 4-5.
We reverse and remand for the district court to conside r whether application of the § 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement is appr opriate in Dixon’s case. HEANEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I respectfully dissent in this case for the reasons set forth in my dissent in the companion case, United States v. Harris on , No. 96-2544 (8th Cir. May 9, 1997). A true copy.
Attest. CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2014434EN.01000101.xml

| 4.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 434/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 434/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 December 2014

(2014/C 434/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2331 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,20 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4411 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2713 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2032 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6560 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,623 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,72 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1598 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4268 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7572 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4620 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4034 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5597 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5884 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6149 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 373,85 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,7793 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5752 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6755 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 167,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2505 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,018 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 65,3750 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,511 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1534 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3620 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,2179 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2331

JPY

Japanese yen

147,20

DKK

Danish krone

7,4411

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78620

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2713

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2032

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6560

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,623

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,72

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1598

RON

Romanian leu

4,4268

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7572

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4620

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4034

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5597

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5884

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6149

KRW

South Korean won

1 373,85

ZAR

South African rand

13,7793

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5752

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6755

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 167,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2505

PHP

Philippine peso

55,018

RUB

Russian rouble

65,3750

THB

Thai baht

40,511

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1534

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3620

INR

Indian rupee

76,2179

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000493 26-SEP-2013 08:56 AM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             403
<SECURITIES>                                    26,756
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,440
<ALLOWANCES>                                       319
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                82,817
<PP&E>                                          23,995
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,070
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 386,750
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,777
<BONDS>                                          1,311
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         33
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                     328,836
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   386,750
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                73,821
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   31,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,943
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (51,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,579)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.02)


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 30, 2016

No. 04-16-00536-CV

BEXAR-MEDINA-ATASCOSA COUNTIES WATER CONTROL AND 

IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1,

Appellant/ Cross-Appellee

v.

BANDERA COUNTY RIVER AUTHORITY AND GROUNDWATER DISTRICT,

Appellee/ Cross-Appellant

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Bandera County, Texas

Trial Court No. CV-13-351

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On October 4, 2016, we suspended all appellate deadlines to allow the parties to mediate 

this cause. The parties were unable to reach a settlement. It is therefore ORDERED that this 

appeal is reinstated on the docket of this Court. 

Appellant’s brief is due no later than December 29, 2016.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Order entered September 23, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00041-CR

EDGAR JUVENTION BARRIENTOS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-80994-07

ORDER

The Court DENIES appellant’s motion for interlocutory.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to Edgar Juvention 

Barrientos, TDCJ No. 1907591, Boyd Unit, 200 Spur 113, Teague, Texas, 75860-2007.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
## I'll have to double check on Monday when I'm back in the plant, but I'm just abou t certain that the feed dryer WAS OPERATING durning the 2010 ICR test.

Back in 2010 we committed to run a metals test on the SRF when we had an opportun i ty to test the SRF alone. That opportunity is pretty much the only reason we did that 2 011 test and sent those results to you.

Mike B.

________________________________________ From: Topham.Nathan@epamail.epa.gov [Topham.Nathan@epamail.epa.gov ] Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 7:28 AM
To: Mike Buckantz Subject: Question Regarding RSR Rotary Furnace

Hi Mike,

We had a quick question regarding your 2010 stack test at the Middletown, NY faci l ity submitted under the ICR. We realize that the emissions from the rotary furnace a n d feed dryer at this facility share a common stack. However, it was our understanding t h at during the 2010 stack test, only the rotary furnace was operating. This was the c ase for the most recent 2011 stack test that you submitted. However, the 2010 stack test does not contain any information confirming this. Can you confirm that the feed dryer was not operating during the 2010 ICR stack test?

Thanks,

Nathan Topham Environmental Engineer US EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/MIG Phone - (919)541-0483 F r o m: Mi k e B u c k a n t z < M B u ck a n t z @ r s r c o r p

. c o m>

T o: N a t h a n T o p h a m / R T P/ U SEPA / U S @ EPA

D a t e: 0 9 / 3 0 / 2 0 11 1 1 : 1 9 AM

S u b j e c t: R E: Q u e s t i o n R e g a r d i n g R S R R o t a r y F u r n a ce



# P a g e 1 o f 1
#### Edwardo Galleries, Ltd., Respondent-Appellant, v Federal Express Corporation, Appellant-Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 550]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Saralee Evans, J.), entered February 18, 2003, which, upon a verdict in plaintiffs favor after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff damages in the principal amount of $15,000, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, the principal amount of the award increased to $35,000, and otherwise affirmed, without costs, and the matter remanded for entry of an appropriate judgment.

*314For this shipment, which consisted of two porcelain figurines, defendant’s airbill contained a liability limitation of $500 per item. However, that limitation no longer applied when plaintiff identified the goods being shipped and declared a maximum value per item of $25,000, paying an additional fee based on that valuation. Instead of refusing shipment on that condition, defendant accepted the items at the declared value, along with the additional fee, and thus became bound by the consequences *(Williams Dental Co., Inc. v Air Express Intl.,*824 F Supp 435, 440 [SD NY 1993], *affd*17 F3d 392 [1993]).

Where a limited liability provision does not apply, the measure of damages is generally the market value of the goods shipped, to be determined at the place of destination at the time of delivery *(see Rodriguez & Co. v Moore-McCormack Lines,*32 NY2d 425 [1973]; *Goltzman v Rougeot,*122 F Supp 700, 706 [D La 1954]), but not to exceed the declared value set by the parties. The trial court improperly fixed the damages at the wholesale value (plaintiffs cost), rather than the proven retail market value (the contracted sales price) at the point of delivery. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
      certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: April
              2, 2007
            By:
            */s/* *Charles
              W. Fritz*Name:
                Charles W. Fritz
              Title:Interim
                  Chief Executive
                  Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and will be
      retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
      Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT
      32.1




SECTION
      906 CERTIFICATION








The
      certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Annual
      Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) for the
      purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
      Title 18 of the United States Code.




Jiri
      Nor,
      the Chief Executive Officer and Anthony Durkacz, the Vice President, Finance
      of
      Astris Energi Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his
      knowledge:




1.
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Exchange Act; and





2.
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Astris
                Energi Inc.






By:
      /s/
      Jiri K. Nor


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


Date:
      February 20, 2006




By:
      /s/
      Anthony Durkacz


Vice
      President, Finance


Date:
      February 20, 2006
# C_2016111EN.01000101.xml

| 29.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 111/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 106, 21.3.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 98, 14.3.2016

OJ C 90, 7.3.2016

OJ C 78, 29.2.2016

OJ C 68, 22.2.2016

OJ C 59, 15.2.2016

OJ C 48, 8.2.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>                     
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from Form 10Q at
November  30,  1996  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>     
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                         653,000
<SECURITIES>                                   1,868,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               9,000
<PP&E>                                         25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 22,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,530,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,836,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2,530,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               164,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             27,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (134,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (134,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (134,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)
        

</TABLE>