alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016250EN.01000101.xml

| 9.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 July 2016

(2016/C 250/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1070 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 111,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4412 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85243 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4685 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0855 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3930 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,033 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,08 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4278 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5132 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2402 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4731 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4406 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5866 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5221 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4903 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 280,91 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2687 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4011 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4842 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 605,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4535 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,252 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,9558 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,039 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6942 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7956 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,5132 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1070

JPY

Japanese yen

111,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4412

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85243

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4685

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0855

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3930

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,033

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,08

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4278

RON

Romanian leu

4,5132

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2402

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4731

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4406

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5866

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5221

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4903

KRW

South Korean won

1 280,91

ZAR

South African rand

16,2687

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4011

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4842

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 605,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4535

PHP

Philippine peso

52,252

RUB

Russian rouble

70,9558

THB

Thai baht

39,039

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6942

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7956

INR

Indian rupee

74,5132

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.

Date: March 4, 2005                           By: /s/ Charles T. Jensen
     --------------                           ------------------------------
                                              Name:  Charles T. Jensen
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NeoMedia Technologies, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                     32.1-1
EXHIBIT 21.1



SUBSIDIARIES OF TUMBLEWEED COMMUNICATIONS
CORP.

AS OF MARCH 12, 2003



|Subsidiary                                 |  | Date of Incorporation |  | Country of Incorporation
|------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Tumbleweed Communications, Ltd.            |  | 02/23/99              |  | U.K.                    
|Tumbleweed Communications GmbH             |  | 05/21/99              |  | Germany                 
|Tumbleweed Communications S.A.             |  | 05/25/99              |  | France                  
|Tumbleweed Communications Aktiebolag (AB)  |  | 03/14/00              |  | Sweden                  
|Tumbleweed Communications BV               |  | 03/23/00              |  | Netherlands             
|Tumbleweed Communications Ltd.Hong Kong   |  | 05/22/00              |  | Hong Kong               
|Tumbleweed Communications GmbHSwitzerland |  | 08/08/00              |  | Switzerland             
|Interface Systems, Inc.                    |  | 01/15/98              |  | U.S.A.
##### 



Exhibit 21.1
 Name
    
    JurisdictionOptical Communication Products, Inc.
    
    DelawareOptical Communication Products (Europe) Ltd
    
    United KingdomGigaComm Corporation
    
    TaiwanShanghai
Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Shanghai, ChinaZhuhai
FTZ Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Zhuhai, ChinaZhuhai
FTZ Oplink Optical Communications, Inc.(formerly Zhuhai
Oplink Communications, Inc., located in Zhuhai, China)
    
    Zhuhai, ChinaOplink
Macau Commercial Services Company Limited
    
    Macau, ChinaAccumux
Technologies, Inc.
    
    California, USCayman
Oplink Communications, Inc.PO Box 309GTUgland
House, South Church StreetGeorge Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman
Islands
    
    Cayman Islands, B.W.I.

King
Galaxy International LimitedCommonwealth Trust
LimitedP.O. Box 3321Road Town, Tortola, British
Virgin Islands.
    
    British Virgin IslandsF3 Inc.
    
    Taiwan, ChinaTaiwan
Oplink Communications, Inc.
    
    Taiwan, China
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Osborn, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hudson's Grill International, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the periods presented in this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

|Date:	May 20, 2008 | /s/David L. Osborn

[Signature]

President
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------

f\sec\o01.080331
<PAGE>

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Jack Morgan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to  Section  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on
Form  10-QSB  of  Cellway Ventures, Inc. for the quarterly period ended June 30,
2002  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934  and  that  the information contained in the
Quarterly  Report  on  Form  10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the
financial  condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Cellway  Ventures,  Inc.



                                       By:       /s/ Jack Morgan
                                                 -------------------------------

                                       Name:     JACK  MORGAN

                                       Title:    Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

                                       Date:     September 26, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

**In the Matter of**

**LORENZO C. FITZGERALD :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 2231 Disciplinary Docket No. 3** 

**Board File No. C1-14-361 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals,**  **No. 13-BG-1502) Attorney Registration No. 42249**  **(Out of State)**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 26 th**  **day of January, 2016, having failed to reply to thi s Court’s**  **directive to provide reasons against the imposition of a reciprocal suspension, Lorenzo**  **C. Fitzgerald is suspended from the practice of law in this Commonwealth for a period**  **of one year. He is directed to comply with all the pr ovisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.** 

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the decision of this matter.**
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2015

d1019

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2015

148794

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 148794

COA: 318881 

Clinton CC: 12-009012-FC

JAMES DUANE YANNA,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

By order of July 29, 2014, the application for leave to appeal the January 22, 2014 

order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in People v 

Lockridge (Docket No. 149073). On order of the Court, the case having been decided on 

July 29, 2015, 498 Mich 358 (2015), the application is again considered. Pursuant to 

MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the 

Clinton Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially 

different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in Lockridge. On remand, 

the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial 

court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the 

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, 

however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence 

absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. 

In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the 

remaining question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
Acrongenomics Inc. for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, Ron
Lizée hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:

|1. | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
      as amended; and                          
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                           
|2. | the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Acrongenomics Inc..

November 19, 2008

/s/ Ron Lizée Ron
LizéeChief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director (Principal
Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Acrongenomics Inc. and will be retained by
Acrongenomics Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-30807

Summary Calendar

 

SHANE DANTONI,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; ET AL.,

Defendants,

CITY OF NEW ORLEANS; GARY CALICO, Individually and in his

capacity as an Officer of the New Orleans Police Department; FRED

FATH, Individually and in his capacity as an Officer of the New

Orleans Police Department; LIONEL HAYNES, Individually and in his

official capacity as an Officer of the New Orleans Police

Department,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 96-CV-3083

- - - - - - - - - -

February 16, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Shane Dantoni appeals the summary-judgment dismissal of his

civil rights claims against the City of New Orleans (the “City”),

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, for use of excessive force by
No. 97-30807

-2-

** Dantoni’s lawsuit also included several state-law causes

of action. Because he does not raise the issue of the dismissal

of these claims on appeal, we decline to address them. Baker v.

Putnal, 75 F.3d 190, 200 (5th Cir. 1996).

Officer Gary Calico during the course of his arrest in March

1996.** Dantoni argues that the magistrate judge erred in

dismissing his lawsuit after concluding that he had failed to

create a genuine issue of fact regarding the existence of a

municipal policy which caused Officer Calico to violate his civil

rights. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and affirm

for essentially the same reasons stated by the magistrate judge. 

See Board of County Comm’rs of Bryan County, Oklahoma v. Brown,

117 S. Ct. 1382, 1386-90 (1997).

AFFIRMED.
###### **EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

#### **Section 1350Certificate of Chief Executive Officer**

                In connection with theQuarterly Report of Summus, Inc. (USA)  (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theQuarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Gary E. Ban, the Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

                1. The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                2. The information containedin this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 

| Date:          November 12, 2004      | /s/ Gary E. Ban                                       Gary E. Ban    Chief ExecutiveOfficer |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Order entered November 10, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00896-CR

KYLE HERMAN HIBBARD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 265th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1951973-R

ORDER

Before the Court is attorney Lawrence B. Mitchell’s Motion to Withdraw 

this Court’s October 26, 2022 Order denying his request that the Court withdraw 

its October 7, 2022 Order ordering him to provide appellant with copies of all 

motions filed with the Court on appellant’s behalf, copies of court 

communications, responses, orders, and mandates in this case, and two copies of 

the Court’s opinion.
We DENY Lawrence B. Mitchell’s November 4, 2022 Motion to Withdraw 

Order and DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send copies of the filings and orders

in this case from September 2, 2022 (the date this Court received appellant’s

August 29, 2022 request for records) through the date of this Order to Kyle 

Hibbard at #2408653 NE: Middleton Unit 13055 FM 3522 Abilene, Texas 79601.

/s/ DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
Exhibit 32

 (a) Certification of Annual Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       -------------------
                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       April 15, 2005



<PAGE>


(b) Certification of Annual Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ William Swain
                                       -----------------
                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       April 15, 2005
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

      1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of  operation of the
Company.

Date: March 29, 2006                          By: /s/ David A. Dodge
      ----------------                        Name: David A. Dodge
                                              Title: Chief Financial Officer


A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been provided to NeoMedia  Technologies,
Inc. and will be retained by NeoMedia  Technologies,  Inc. and  furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                     32.2-1
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Selected Consolidated Financial Data" and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-43716, 333-50579, 333-50581, 333-50585, 333-53331, 333-62884, 333-65405) pertaining to the Restricted Stock and Nonstatutory Stock Option Awards to Certain
Employees, the Trammell Crow Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended, the Trammell Crow Company 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Trammell Crow Company Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, the
Trammell Crow Company Retirement Savings Plan, and Restricted Stock to Certain Employees of our report dated February 20, 2002, except for Note 21, as to which the date is
March 1, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Trammell Crow Company and Subsidiaries included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.

Dallas,
Texas
March 25, 2002

---

QuickLinks