alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2788 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 134
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2788

          To reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2021

Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Grassley, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. 
Cassidy, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; which was read 
                             the first time

                           September 22, 2021

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
          To reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``NFIP Extension Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM.

    (a) Financing.--Section 1309(a) of the National Flood Insurance Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4016(a)) is amended by striking ``September 30, 
2021'' and inserting ``December 3, 2021''.
    (b) Program Expiration.--Section 1319 of the National Flood 
Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4026) is amended by striking 
``September 30, 2021'' and inserting ``December 3, 2021''.
                                                       Calendar No. 134

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 2788

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

          To reauthorize the National Flood Insurance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 22, 2021

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
--

1 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

From: Paul & Kathy [mtn.run02@gmail.com] 


Sent:. Saturday, February 13, 2010 8:41AM 


To:· Devany,. Dennis (OST) 

ec: . backspin @yniaiLcom 

Subj~c~~ . CapeAit _ < ·".:7t-:,,~,.: 

Tfie'Clfntb~:C6'Unty politicos made a hu~e mistake in dropping Cape Air. As usual, politicians only 

see tax money and the IIpie in theskyll maybes of their flawed logic. 

That's why they spent so much money ina meeting room in the airport and ignored passenger waiting 

passenger comfort. 

As usual, taxpayers will be hit in the wallet by their ill conceived decisions ... 

Paul. Endersbee 

Plattsburgh, NY 

1
Motion Granted and Order filed December 6, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00836-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF J.P. AND J.P., MINOR CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 245th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2010-81181

ORDER

On November 17, 2016, appellant filed a motion for an extension of time to 

pay for the reporter’s record. We construe that motion as one for an extension of 

time to file the reporter’s record and issue the following order. See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.3(c) (“The appellate court may enter any order necessary to ensure the timely 

filing of the appellate record.”).

Appellant’s motion is granted. The reporter’s record shall be filed by January 

5, 2017.

PER CURIAM
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 08-1823

___________

David G. Jeep, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit *

Judge, Camden County; Devin M. * Appeal from the United States

Ledom, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, * District Court for the

Camden County; Alex Little, Police * Western District of Missouri.

Officer, #920, City of Osage Beach; *

Tim Taylor, Police Officer, #913, City *

of Osage Beach; W. Steven Rives, * [UNPUBLISHED]

Prosecuting Attorney; W. James *

Icenogle, Prosecuting Attorney; Bruce *

Colyer, Associate Circuit Judge; Jay *

Nixon, Attorney General, State of *

Missouri; Camden County; City of *

Osage Beach; State of Missouri, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: October 6, 2008

Filed: October 10, 2008

___________

Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________
1

The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri. 

-2-

PER CURIAM.

David Jeep appeals the district court’s1

 orders dismissing his claims against

multiple defendants and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants in

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful review, we conclude that the orders were

proper for the reasons stated by the district court and that an extended discussion is

not warranted. See Maness v. Dist. Court, 495 F.3d 943, 943-44 (8th Cir. 2007) (per

curiam) (de novo review of dismissals based on immunity); Rouse v. Benson, 193

F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 1999) (district court’s grant of summary judgment reviewed

de novo). 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B,

and we deny as moot Jeep’s motion for an expedited appeal.

______________________________
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

*Filings Instituting Proceedings*

*Docket Numbers:* PR15-30-000.

*Applicants:* Enbridge Pipelines (Oklahoma Trasmission) L.L.C.

*Description:* Submits tariff filing per 284.123(b)(2) + (g): Revised SOC—No Rate Change to be effective 3/18/2015; Filing Type: 1310.

*Filed Date:* 3/17/15.

*Accession Number:* 20150317-5054.

*Comments Due:* 5 p.m. ET 4/7/15. 284.123(g) Protests Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/18/15.

*Docket Numbers:* RP15-654-000.

*Applicants:* Northwest Pipeline LLC.

*Description:* Compliance filing per 154.203: RM14-21—Map Compliance Filing to be effective 4/17/2015.

*Filed Date:* 3/17/15.

*Accession Number:* 20150317-5203.

*Comments Due:* 5 p.m. ET 3/30/15.

*Docket Numbers:* RP15-655-000.

*Applicants:* Union Power Partners, L.P.

*Description:* Joint Petition for Limited Waiver of Union Power Partners, L.P., Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., and Entergy Texas, Inc.

*Filed Date:* 3/17/15.

*Accession Number:* 20150317-5225.

*Comments Due:* 5 p.m. ET 3/30/15.

The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number.

Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.

eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: *http://www.ferc.gov/​docs-filing/​efiling/​filing-req.pdf.* For other information, call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Dated: March 18, 2015.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-07163 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-18-00254-CV

Charles J. MELNIK,

Appellant

v.

Dewayne BALDWIN, Tonia Baldwin,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 1, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CV-0012

Honorable Robin V. Dwyer, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellees Dewayne and Tonia Baldwin recover their costs of 

this appeal from appellant Charles Melnik.

SIGNED June 5, 2019.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
# C_2016348EN.01000201.xml

| 23.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8194 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/Tilburg I & II)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 348/03)

On 19 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8194. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8194. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Deltic Timber Corporation (the report) for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a14(b) or Rule 15d14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Ray C. Dillon, the Chief Executive Officer, and Clefton D. Vaughan, the Chief Financial Officer, each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Deltic Timber Corporation.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ray C. DillonRay C. DillonChief Executive OfficerMarch 8, 2007/s/ Clefton D. VaughanClefton D. VaughanChief Financial OfficerMarch 8, 2007
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                              Washington, DC 20549

---

---

---

---

C/O 4700 South 900 East
Suite 41B Salt Lake City UT 84117-4959 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
(ZIP CODE)

---

---

March  31,  2001 and 2000
and the Period June 14, 1982 (Date of Inception) to March 31, 2001



---

At December 31, 2000, the
Company had a net operating  loss carry  forward of $32,200.  The tax benefit of
$9,660 from the loss carry forward has been fully offset by a valuation  reserve
because  the use of the future tax benefit is  undeterminable  since the Company
has no operations.  The net operating loss will expire  starting in 2011 through
2022.
February 23, 2015 

A.J. Muldoon 

Post Office Box 1569 

Carlsbad, NM 88221-1569 

(575) 887-1191 

1-800-658-2 713 

www.cityofcarlsbadnm.com 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

EAS@dot.gov 

Dear Mr. Muldoon: 

DALEJANWAY 

MAYOR 

STEVE MCCUTCHEON 

C!TYJlDkUN7STRATOR 

Thank you for again offering us the opportunity to provide feedback in your recommendation to the 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs regarding the upcoming Essential Air Service 

(EAS) contract for Carlsbad, New Mexico (Order 2014-12-11). 

We're writing to you as the leadership of the Carlsbad Air Service Committee, an organization appointed 

by Carlsbad Mayor Dale Janway to consider this issue. Business travel in this area is related to the oil 

industry, potash and the Department of Energy's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP). Additionally, we 

have many veterans and retirees in our community who travel to Albuquerque on a regular basis for 

medical care. 

After extensive review, we're requesting you recommend the selection of Boutique Air for the EAS 

contract in Carlsbad. We believe Boutique Air will serve the residents of Carlsbad and their business and 

personal interests. We have been in contact with our neighboring community of Clovis, New Mexico, 

and have received strong positive feedback about Boutique Air. 

We were impressed by Boutique's presentation in Carlsbad and believe the airline will put a strong 

emphasis on customer service and accessibility. Additionally, Boutique's offer of pressurized flights will 

significantly improve the comfort level of our community's frequent travelers, including our veterans 

and retirees. 

Your current RFP invites bidders to prepare a package that offers two round trip flights a day. Boutique 

Air submitted two options- two flights a day to Albuquerque or two flights a day to Dallas/Fort Worth. 

We understand that we may select parts of each suggested schedules. With that in mind we ask you to 

approve one round trip flight to Albuquerque six days a week and one round trip flight to Dallas 

Ft/Worth six days a week. 

Wardl 

lUCK. G. SALCIDO 

WardZ 

SANDRA lt. BURLEY 

COUNCILORS 

Ward3 

JASON G. SJIJRLEY 

Ward4 

JANELL E. WBITLOCK. 
Carlsbad is the fastest growing city in the state and Eddy County has the state's second highest per 

capita income. Many of our area's federal employees and contractors frequently need to travel to and 

from either Washington D.C. or the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant's generator sites, and a waypoint at 

Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport will reduce travel time and likely lower overall costs. We believe 

an RFP for two total Carlsbad flights a day would be most appropriate, and we hope to work with the 

EAS and Boutique Air. 

Thank you and the Assistant Secretary for giving our preference serious consideration.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 132165(51) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. HARVEY JONES, JR., Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 132165 COA: 260040 Wayne CC: 97-738912-NI ROBERT DUANE RIBBRON, Defendant, and

SECURA INSURANCE, Garnishee Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s June 8, 2007 order is considered, and it is DENIED, beca use it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

M ARKMAN

, J., would grant the motion for reconsideration and grant leave to appeal.

p0830 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2007

Clerk
# C_2015421EN.01001101.xml

| 17.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/11

---

Public holidays in 2016: EEA EFTA States and EEA institutions

(2015/C 421/07)

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway | EFTA Surveillance Authority | EFTA Court |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 January | X | X | X | X | X |
| 6 January | | X | | | |
| 2 February | | X | | | |
| 8 February | | | | | X |
| 9 February | | X | | | |
| 24 March | X | | X | X | X |
| 25 March | X | X | X | X | X |
| 28 March | X | X | X | X | X |
| 21 April | X | | | | |
| 5 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 6 May | | | | X | X |
| 16 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 17 May | | | X | | |
| 26 May | | X | | | |
| 17 June | X | | | | |
| 23 June | | | | | X |
| 24 June | | | | | X |
| 1 August | X | | | | |
| 15 August | | X | | X | X |
| 29 August | | | | | X |
| 8 September | | X | | | |
| 1 November | | X | | X | X |
| 2 November | | | | | X |
| 8 December | | X | | | |
| 23 December | | | | X | |
| 26 December | X | X | X | X | X |
| 27 December | | | | X | X |
| 28 December | | | | X | X |
| 29 December | | | | X | X |
| 30 December | | | | X | X |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

EFTA Surveillance Authority

EFTA Court

1 January

X

X

X

X

X

6 January

X

2 February

X

8 February

X

9 February

X

24 March

X

X

X

X

25 March

X

X

X

X

X

28 March

X

X

X

X

X

21 April

X

5 May

X

X

X

X

X

6 May

X

X

16 May

X

X

X

X

X

17 May

X

26 May

X

17 June

X

23 June

X

24 June

X

1 August

X

15 August

X

X

X

29 August

X

8 September

X

1 November

X

X

X

2 November

X

8 December

X

23 December

X

26 December

X

X

X

X

X

27 December

X

X

28 December

X

X

29 December

X

X

30 December

X

X

Public holidays falling on Saturdays and Sundays are not listed.

---
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00265-CV

Diamante Custom Homes, LLC

v.

Prosperity Bank USA

On Appeal from the

377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 19-04-84348-D

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 6, 2022
Exhibit
13.2




CARTHEW
BAY TECHNOLOGIES INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Carthew Bay Technologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Brian D. Clewes, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Brian D. ClewesBrian
      D. ClewesSecretary,
      Treasurer, and Chief Financial OfficerMay
      19, 2009
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 60 (Monday, March 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16682]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07158]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in or To Acquire Companies Engaged 
in Permissible Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage de novo, or to acquire or 
control voting securities or assets of a company, including the 
companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec.  225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has 
determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible 
for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities 
will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than April 4, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. First Business Financial Services, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin; to 
engage de novo in certain community development activities by making a 
qualifying community welfare investment in a fund of funds, pursuant to 
section 225.28(b)(12)(i).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 25, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-07158 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P