alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5 
<CIK>                         0000889472
<NAME>                        Dynex Securities Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                          10
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0 <F1>
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  10
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0 <F1>
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        10
<OTHER-SE>                      0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    10
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0
<FN>

<F1> The Company's balance sheet is unclassified.
</FN>
        



</TABLE>
# C_2016219EN.01000101.xml

| 17.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/1

---

Inapplicability of the Regulation to a notified operation

(Case M.7538 — Knorr Bremse/Vossloh)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 219/01)

On 21 May 2015, the Commission decided that the notified operation in the above case does not fall within the scope of the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) because it does not constitute a concentration within the meaning of Article 3 of the said Regulation. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(a) of the Regulation. The full text of the decision is available only in Dutch and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7538. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7538. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015139EN.01000101.xml

| 28.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 April 2015

(2015/C 139/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0822 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3562 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0367 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4345 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,441 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 301,21 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0037 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4173 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9414 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3867 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3155 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3877 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4250 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4435 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 162,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1046 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7311 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5943 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 057,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8533 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 47,933 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 55,8503 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,386 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2023 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6591 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,7926 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0822

JPY

Japanese yen

129,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71620

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3562

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0367

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4345

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,441

HUF

Hungarian forint

301,21

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0037

RON

Romanian leu

4,4173

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9414

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3867

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3155

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3877

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4250

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4435

KRW

South Korean won

1 162,38

ZAR

South African rand

13,1046

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7311

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5943

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 057,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8533

PHP

Philippine peso

47,933

RUB

Russian rouble

55,8503

THB

Thai baht

35,386

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2023

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6591

INR

Indian rupee

68,7926

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015241EN.01000301.xml

| 23.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 241/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 241/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 July 2015

(2015/C 241/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0902 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,98 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4616 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69820 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3836 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0482 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8990 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,068 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,33 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1208 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4198 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9660 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4765 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4167 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4498 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6562 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4889 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 257,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4922 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7695 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5880 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 621,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1359 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,260 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,3115 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,795 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4816 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5173 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,3814 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0902

JPY

Japanese yen

134,98

DKK

Danish krone

7,4616

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69820

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3836

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0482

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8990

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,068

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,33

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1208

RON

Romanian leu

4,4198

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9660

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4765

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4167

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4498

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6562

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4889

KRW

South Korean won

1 257,50

ZAR

South African rand

13,4922

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7695

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5880

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 621,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1359

PHP

Philippine peso

49,260

RUB

Russian rouble

62,3115

THB

Thai baht

37,795

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4816

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5173

INR

Indian rupee

69,3814

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
---

CERTIFICATION OF 
  CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, ANDREW MARTYN-SMITH, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
  Financial Officer of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. (the Company),
  hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company,
        for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, and to which this certification
        is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with
        the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
        Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
        of the Company.                                                                                                                                                         

| | By:    | /s/ Andrew Martyn-Smith
| | ------ | -----------------------
| |        |                        
| | Name:  | ANDREW MARTYN-SMITH    
| |        |                        
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
| |        | Chief Financial Officer
| |        |                        
| | Date:  | May 17, 2004           

A signed original of this written statement required by
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
  and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which
  it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
  and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
  the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
  before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general incorporation
  language contained in such filing.

---
Exhibit 13.1

                               ASTRIS ENERGI INC.

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Astris Energi, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jiri K. Nor, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Jiri K. Nor
-------------------------------------
Jiri K. Nor
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 11, 2007
[Civ. No. 9247.

First Appellate District, Division Two.

June 14, 1934.]

#### EDWIN V. HAVERTY, Respondent, v. C. A. HARTWELL, Appellant.

Bronson, Bronson & Slaven for Appellant.

Irving- Phillip Barnett and Samuel P. Yartan for Respondent.

NOURSE, P. J.

In a trial before a jury the plaintiff obtained a verdict against the defendant Hartwell in which the jury specified $1100 as special damages and $3,900 as general damages. The injuries to plaintiff arose out of a motor vehicle collision and on the trial the defendant Hart-well admitted liability arising out of his negligence which caused the injuries.

In his appeal from the judgment the point raised is the misconduct of counsel for the plaintiff in his address to the jury when he stated: “You have been reading in the paper in the last few days about what some people have been getting where they have had brain injuries without objective symptoms.” Appellant argues that counsel must have had in mind a particular case in which a jury had a short time before returned a verdict for fifty thousand dollars in a ease where the plaintiff had suffered *266injuries to lier brain. It is then said that, inasmuch as this case involved injuries to plaintiff’s brain, the statement must have influenced the verdict.

Res¡)ondent makes sufficient answer that, the negligence being admitted, the only real issue was the amount of the verdict, and, since appellant docs not claim that the verdict is excessive, he has failed to show prejudicial error. Respondent then points to the evidence showing the extent of his injuries and affirmatively asserts that the verdict is not excessive. Similar questions have arisen in cases involving misconduct of counsel in referring to the fact that the liability of the defendant is covered by insurance. In reviewing those cases the courts have held that, where the verdict is not excessive and the question of defendant’s liability is not close, the misconduct will not be deemed prejudicial. *(Eldridge*v. *Clark & Henery Const. Co.,*75 Cal. App. 516, 532 [243 Pac. 43]; *Coursault*v. *Schwebel,*118 Cal. App. 259, 265 [5 Pac. (2d) 77]; *Crabbe*v. *Rhoades,*101 Cal. App. 503, 513 [282 Pac. *10]; Lahti*v. *McMenamin,*204 Cal. 415, 422 [268 Pac. 644].)

The judgment is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., and Spence, J., concurred.
Order filed November 29, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00824-CV

____________

WILLIAM H. POFF AND JULIA A. POFF, Appellants

V.

JUAN CARLOS GUZMAN AND CYPRESS FOUR PROPERTY 

VENTURES, LLC, Appellees

On Appeal from the 506th Judicial District Court

Waller County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16-04-23698

ORDER

On November 15, 2016, appellants notified this court that they filed an 

affidavit of indigence in the trial court. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.1(b)(1) 

provides that when a statement of inability to afford payment of costs was filed in 

the trial court, the party’s indigence status in the trial court carries forward on appeal. 

The exception to this rule is when the party files a motion alleging the party’s 
2

financial circumstances have materially changed since the date of the trial court’s 

order. Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(3). 

The clerk’s record has not been filed in this appeal. This court has not been 

advised whether appellants filed a statement of inability to afford payment of costs 

in the trial court, whether the statement was contested, or the ruling on any contest, 

if any. To determine appellants’ indigent status, we issue the following order for a 

partial clerk’s record.

We order the Waller County District Clerk to file a partial clerk’s record with 

the clerk of this court on or before December 14, 2016. The partial clerk’s record

shall contain (1) the judgment being appealed; (2) any motion for new trial, other 

post-judgment motion, or request for findings of fact and conclusions of law; and 

(3) the notice of appeal. In addition, the partial clerk’s record shall contain: (4)

appellants’ statement of inability to afford payment of costs; (5) the contest(s) to the 

statement, if any; (6) the trial court’s order ruling on any contest; and (7) any other 

documents pertaining to the claim of indigence and the contests thereto. 

PER CURIAM
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
Acrongenomics Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Dr. Dimitri Goundis hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to his knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

May 20, 2008

| | /s/ Dimitri Goundis          
| | -----------------------------
| | Dr. Dimitri Goundis          
| | Chief Executive Officer      
| | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Acrongenomics Inc. and will be retained by
Acrongenomics Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit 24.10**

** **

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

** **

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Derek R.McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher Kirk and each of them, his trueand lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution andresubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and to sign anyor all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each andevery act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do inperson, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-factor their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof.

 

 
|   | /s/ ROBERT E. SULENTIC |   |
|--------|------------------------|--------|
|   | Robert E. Sulentic     |   |

 

----
Order filed November 29, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00745-CV

____________

JORGE ALFREDO CANTU, Appellant

V.

JOSE A. RAMOS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Co Civil Ct at Law No 4

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1075256

O R D E R

The notice of appeal in this case was filed September 14, 2016. To date, the 

filing fee of $205.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellant is excused by 

statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 5. Therefore, the court issues the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee in the amount of $205.00 to the clerk 

of this court on or before December 14, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant 
fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be 

dismissed.

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Selected
Consolidated Financial Data" and to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-50579, 333-50581, 333-50585,
333-53331, 333-65405) pertaining to the Trammell Crow Company Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, the Trammell Crow Company 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Trammell
Crow Company Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Trammell Crow Company Retirement
Savings Plan, and Restricted Stock to Certain Employees of our report dated
February 21, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Trammell Crow Company included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1999.


Dallas, Texas
March 22, 2000
BELAFONTE L. ROSIER,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3771

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal -- Original Jurisdiction.

Belafonte L. Rosier, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for 

Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for belated appeal is denied on the merits.

ROWE, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2915 

To allow National Flood Insurance Program policyholders who leave the 

program to purchase a private insurance flood policy to return to the 

National Flood Insurance Program without penalty, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To allow National Flood Insurance Program policyholders 

who leave the program to purchase a private insurance 

flood policy to return to the National Flood Insurance 

Program without penalty, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Insurance Con5 sumer Choice Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2915 IS

1 SEC. 2. EFFECT OF PRIVATE FLOOD INSURANCE COV2 ERAGE ON CONTINUOUS COVERAGE RE3 QUIREMENTS. 

4 Section 1308 of the National Flood Insurance Act of 

5 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4015), is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following: 

7 ‘‘(n) EFFECT OF PRIVATE FLOOD INSURANCE COV8 ERAGE ON CONTINUOUS COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS.— 

9 For purposes of applying any statutory, regulatory, or ad10 ministrative continuous coverage requirement, including 

11 under section 1307(g)(1), the Administrator shall consider 

12 any period during which a property was continuously cov13 ered by a flood insurance policy through the private mar14 ket that was used to satisfy the requirements under sec15 tion 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 

16 (42 U.S.C. 4012a(a)) to be a period of continuous cov17 erage.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS