alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40349 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ROSENDO NAJERA-MEJIA, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CR-67-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 14, 2000 Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Rosendo Najera-Mejia moves for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Mejia has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief, but he has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s Anders brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

VSE Corporation ) ASBCA No. 63617

)

Under Contract No. N00024-11-D-4229 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Nicole J. Owren-Wiest, Esq.

Erin N. Rankin, Esq.

Charles Baek, Esq.

 Crowell & Moring LLP

 Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

 DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Adrianne L. Goins, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 Defense Contract Management Agency

 Chantilly, VA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 4, 2024

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63617, Appeal of VSE 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 5, 2024

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Exhibit 10.14


 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT
AND UNDERTAKING


 


I,
the undersigned Emad Mohe Tayel, born in Cairo, with Passport Number - A06154698, in my
capacity as shareholder in Anghami for Digital Content registered with the Registry of Commerce in Egypt, sub N° 104024,


 


Hereby
acknowledge registered in my name in the Share Register or any other deed or document of Anghami for Digital Content, are in fact entirely
and exclusively owned by Anghami, a company with registration number 266308-Cayman Islands, which has paid their price and therefore
that the rights inherent to the said shares entirely belong to Anghami.


 


Accordingly,


 


I
declare that I exercise all the rights attached to the above shares, as a nominee for the account of Anghami, and hereby undertake:


 


		1-	To
                                            remit the said shares to Anghami, and to transfer their ownership, upon its first demand
                                            and free of charge, to its name or to the name of any person and/or entity designated by
                                            Anghami.



 


		2-	Not
                                            to transfer any of the said shares without Anghami's written consent and to assign in the
                                            event, the said shares in compliance with Anghami's written request.



 


		3-	Not
                                            to give any of the said shares any collateral and to lift, under my guarantee, any seizure
                                            eventually ordered against the said shares.



 


		4-	To
                                            remit without consideration to Anghami all the profits and all the amounts whatsoever that
                                            I shall receive from Anghami for Digital Content in relation to the said shares.



 


	Date:	15/4/2018	 
	Name:	Emad
    Mohe Mohamed Tayel	 
	Signature: 	/s/ Emad
    Mohe Mohamed Tayel
MEMORANDUM

To: DOE Office of General Counsel

From: William T. Miller

Date: August 20, 2014

Re: August 20, 2014 meeting with DOE representatives regarding the remand of 

the DOE Direct Final Rule as it relates to efficiency standards for non-weatherized 

gas furnaces

This memorandum provides an overview of the meeting between representatives of the 

American Public Gas Association (APGA) and of the Department of Energy (DOE). Present for 

APGA were Dave Schryver and Dan Lapato and its General Counsel, William T. Miller of 

McCarter & English, LLP. Present for DOE were John Cymbalski and Dan Cohen.

The purpose of the meeting was for APGA to discuss several issues regarding the remanded 

notice-and-comment rulemaking resulting from the Court’s order in APGA v. DOE, No. 11-1485, 

issued April 24, 2014. The key points discussed at the meeting were the following:

 The fuel switching survey done by GTI, showing that adoption of a condensing furnace 

standard for all non-weatherized gas furnaces would cause substantial fuel switching 

from natural gas to electricity; the survey is publicly available on the web sites of APGA 

and the American Gas Association.

 The impact analysis done by AGA with the assistance of GTI, showing that the impact of 

adopting a condensing furnace standard for all non-weatherized gas furnaces, and 

utilizing the fuel switching survey data noted above, would be to increase overall energy 

costs, increase source energy usage, and increase CO2 emissions. This impact analysis 

was provided to the DOE Representatives, who indicated they would post it on the DOE 

web site.

 The importance and reasons for identifying condensing and non-condensing furnaces as 

separate product classes under the EPCA and relevant DOE precedents. 

 The expected timing of the release of the Technical Support Document. 

ME1 18787897v.1
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18253-18254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07424]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLCAD01000 L12100000.MD0000 15XL1109AF]


Meeting of the California Desert District Advisory Council

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, in accordance with Public Law 92-463 
and 94-579, that the California Desert District Advisory Council (DAC) 
to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), U.S. Department of the 
Interior, will participate in a field tour of BLM-administered public 
lands on Friday, April 10, 2015, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. and will 
meet in formal session on Saturday, April 11, 2015, from 8:00 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m. in Ridgecrest, CA. Exact meeting location is yet to be 
determined. Agenda for the Saturday meeting will include updates by 
council members, the BLM California Desert District Manager, five Field 
Managers, and council subgroups. The focus topic for the meeting will 
be the BLM's ongoing planning efforts in the West Mojave planning area. 
Final agenda items for the field trip, public meeting, and the meeting 
location will be posted on the DAC Web page at http://www.blm.gov/ca/st/en/info/rac/dac.html when finalized.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All DAC meetings are open to the public. 
Public comment for items not on the agenda will be scheduled at the 
beginning of the meeting Saturday morning. Time for public comment is 
made available by the council chairman during the presentation of 
various agenda items, and is scheduled at the end of the meeting for 
topics not on the agenda.
    While the Saturday meeting is tentatively scheduled from 8:00 a.m. 
to 4:30 p.m., the meeting could conclude

[[Page 18254]]

prior to 4:30 p.m. should the council conclude its presentations and 
discussions. Therefore, members of the public interested in a 
particular agenda item or discussion should schedule their arrival 
accordingly.
    Written comments may be filed in advance of the meeting for the 
California Desert District Advisory Council, c/o Bureau of Land 
Management, External Affairs, 22835 Calle San Juan de Los Lagos, Moreno 
Valley, CA 92553. Written comments also are accepted at the time of the 
meeting and, if copies are provided to the recorder, will be 
incorporated into the minutes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Razo, BLM California Desert 
District External Affairs, (951) 697-5217. Persons who use a 
telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339 to contact the above 
individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is available 24 hours 
a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question with the above 
individuals. You will receive a reply during normal hours.

    Dated: March 19, 2015.
Teresa A. Raml,
California Desert District Manager.
[FR Doc. 2015-07424 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-40-P
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

J.S., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-1222

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed February 15, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for

Hillsborough County; Michael J. Scionti,

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender,

and Julius J. Aulisio, Assistant Public

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General,

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, LUCAS, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### Irving Fajans, Respondent, *v.*R. H. Macy & Co., Inc., Appellant.*

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 23, 1937.

*101*Leon Lauterstein,*for the appellant.

*Herbert Lebovici [Samuel Friedlander*of counsel], for the respondent.

*

Revg. 163 Misc. 182.

Pee Curiam.

We are of the opinion that the statute (Labor Law, § 390) does not forbid all compulsory contributions to benefit or insurance funds but only those where the fund is maintained or managed for the employees by someone other than themselves. The complaint does not show that this is done in the present case. It does not show that the fund is maintained or managed by the defendant or by any other corporation or unincorporated association or by any person or persons other than the employees themselves.

Order denying motion to dismiss complaint reversed, with ten dollars costs, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff on payment of said costs to serve an amended complaint within six days after service of order entered hereon.

Order striking out defense reversed, and motion denied on the ground that the complaint is itself insufficient.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Aeronautics and Space Administration

          - [Notice (15-021)]

# AGENCY:

National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

# SUMMARY:

Patent applications on the inventions listed below assigned to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

# DATES:

April 1, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mark W. Homer, Patent Counsel, NASA Management Office—JPL, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Stop 180-200, Pasadena, CA 91109; telephone (818) 354-7770.

NASA Case No.: NPO-49116-1-CU: Heliostat with Stowing and Wind Survival Capabilities;

NPO-49439-1: Deep Space Positioning System;

DRC-009-008DIV: Improved Digital Map Rending Method;

DRC-013-019: System and Method for Monitoring the Deflection and Slope of a Three-Dimensional Structure such as a Wing using Strain Measurements at Discrete Locations;

NASA Case No.: DRC-013-020: Wavelet-Based Processing for Fiber Optic Sensing Systems;

DRC-014-003: Highly Elastic Strain Gage for Low Modulus Materials;

DRC-012-033: Improved Ground Collision Avoidance System (iGCAS).

Sumara M. Thompson-King,

General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-07455 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
BEFORE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

MANSFIELD HELIFLIGHT, INC. Complainant,
v. CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT Respondent. DocketNo. 16-14-06

UNOPPOSED MOTION OF THE CITY OF BURLINGTON, VERMONT FORAN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE REBUTTAL

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 16.19 and 16.11(a), the City ofBurlington, Vermont ("City"), the Respondent in the case, requests leave to file and hereby files this motion for an extension of time in whichto file a rebuttal until Friday, January 9, 2015. In support ofthis motion, the City states as follows: 1. OnNovember 24, 2014, Mansfield Heliflight, Inc. ("Mansfield"), the Complainantinthe case, filed with FAA and served onthe City its reply via email. In accordance with Part 16 procedural rules, a "respondentmay file a rebuttal within 10 days ofthe date ofservice ofcomplainant's reply." 14 C.F.R. § 16.23(f). Thus, the procedural rules grant the City until December4, 2014, to submit a rebuttal. 2. The City believes that an extension oftime is bothnecessary and appropriate "for
a fair and complete consideration ofmatters before the agency." 14 C.F.R. § 16.1l(a).Complainantraised new issues inits reply that require careful review, consideration, and response. Counsel for the City has a number ofpreexisting commitments and, as a result ofthe upcoming holidays, additional time to coordinate the rebuttal with City and airport staffis needed.3. OnTuesday, November 25, 2014, the undersigned contacted BenjaminH. Klein, counsel for Complainant, who advisedthat Complainant does not oppose this request. ReliefRequested Forthe foregoing reasons, the City hereby requests an extension oftime in which it may file its rebuttal until Friday, January 9, 2015.

November 25,2014 Respectfully submitted,



# ~~o~/ Pablo 0. Nliesch Spiegel & McDiarmid LLP 1875 Eye St., N.W. Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 Email: pablo.nuesch@spiegelmcd.com Phone: 202-879-4000 Fax: 202-393-2866 Attorney for the City ofBurlington, Vermont

2Certificate ofService

I hereby certify that in accordance with 14 C.F.R. §§ 16.15 and 16.13(h), I have today, the 25th day ofNovember, 2014, causedthe foregoing Unopposed Motion for Extension ofTimeto File Rebuttal to be served electronically, on: Benjamin H. Klein The Klein Law Firm, LLC 61 Broadway, Suite 2125 NewYork, NY 10006 bklein@thekleinfirm.com Attorney for Complainant



# 1L~o~ Pablo 

### 0. Niiesch
# C_2016182EN.01000102.xml

| 20.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.7801 — Wabtec/Faiveley Transport)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 182/02)

On 12 May 2016, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7801 — Wabtec/Faiveley Transport, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
# C_2016023EN.01000501.xml

| 22.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/5

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 23/06)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : France

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 2016 UEFA European Championship

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : Held every four years since 1960, the UEFA men’s football European Championship, commonly referred to as ‘the Euro’, will take place in France from 10 June to 10 July 2016. Euro 2016, the fifteenth edition of the European Football Championship, is organised by the Union of European Football Associations and brings together the best men’s football teams in Europe.

Description of the design

The winner of the competition receives a small-scale version of the Henri Delaunay Cup, named after the man who invented the competition.

The design of the coin features the Henri Delaunay Cup in the middle of an outline map of France, along with the two marks of the Paris Mint. The letters RF for République Française (French Republic) are to the right of the map of France, and the name of the competition ‘UEFA EURO 2016 France’ is written above it. Below the map, a football stands out in the foreground. All of this is set on a background that features graphical elements representing the competition.

République Française

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 10 million coins

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : January 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1, for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Acrongenomics
  Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
  the undersigned, Ron Lizée, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
  1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
  knowledge:

|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

May 22, 2008

| | /s/ Ron Lizée                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------
| | Ron Lizée                                             
| | Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and
      Director
| | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal            
| | Accounting Officer)                                   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Acrongenomics Inc. and will be retained by
Acrongenomics Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

---
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Adam Clark [aclark@wnmu.edu] 

Thursday, January 20, 2011 7:11 PM 

Devany, Dennis (OST); Swanson, Brian (OST) 

Great Lakes Flight 

DCX=OE[- ltitq., .. lQp§ 

I was told to email bothofyouregardingthepossibilityofGreatLakesflights;b:~~wk~.h~iller.~ty.1i~ !Phoenix. I know for 

our team and many other students at the University this would be a big deal. We have a bunch of players from the 

Phoenix area and all over Southern California. If there was a flight between Silver City and there I would bet there would 

be many players and families who would use it, especially during our season. I think it would end up being a pretty busy 

route in general, but that the University (especially the athletics dept) would use it a bunch. If there is another person or 

group I need to send this email to please tell me who I need to send it to. 

Thank You 

ADAM CLARK 

Head Football Coach 

Western ewMexico University 

Office: 575-538-6544 

Cell: 563-505-6194 

Fax: 575-538-6163 

Erna il: ac1arkCmwnrnu.edu 

1