alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

          - [30Day-15-15GD]

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

[FR Doc. 2015-06655 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 a.m.]

*Subject:*                     Emergency Self Escape for Coal Miners.                

*Action:*                     Notice withdrawal.                

# SUMMARY:

                        The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention requests withdrawal from publication the 30-Day                         **Federal Register**                         Notice (FRN) 15-15GD concerning the                         *Emergency Self Escape for Coal Miners*                         ([FR Doc. 2015-06655 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 a.m.]), which was submitted on March 19, 2015 for public inspection in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

CDC published the notice as a Proposed Data Collections Submitted for Public Comment and Recommendations, when, in fact, the notice should have received publication as Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review.

# DATES:

The 30-day FRN published on [03/24/15] at [Vol. 80, No. 56 Page 15618-15619] is withdrawn as of [03/24/15]. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        (404) 639-7570 or send comments to CDC Leroy Richardson, 1600 Clifton Road, MS D-74, Atlanta, GA 30333 or send an email to                         *omb@cdc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

N/A.

Leroy A. Richardson,

Chief, Information Collection Review Office, Office of Scientific Integrity, Office of the Associate Director for Science, Office of the Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2015-07039 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. ER15-402-001; Docket No. ER15-817-000; Docket No. ER15-861-000; Docket No. EL15-53-000;]

      ( print page 16672)    
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) hereby gives notice that on March 26, 2015 members of its staff will attend the California Independent System Operator Corporation's (CAISO) Board of Governors meeting. The agenda and other documents for the meeting are available on CAISO's Web site, *www.caiso.com.*

Sponsored by CAISO, the meeting is open to all market participants and staff's attendance is part of the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts. The meeting may discuss matters at issue in the above captioned dockets.

For further information, contact Saeed Farrokhpay at *saeed.farrokhpay@ferc.gov* (916) 294-0322.

Dated: March 24, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-07203 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8080

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RAYMOND DOUGLAS MASSENBURG, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:97-cr-00003-REP-1)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Douglas Massenburg, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David 

Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Douglas Massenburg, Jr., appeals the district 

court’s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) 

motion for reconsideration of his sentence. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

Massenburg, No. 3:97-cr-00003-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2009). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1999 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

9-12-1999

Hull v. Kyler

Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 97-7551

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1999 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Hull v. Kyler" (1999). 1999 Decisions. Paper 254.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1999/254
 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

 FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 

 No. 97-7551 

 Hull v. Kyler 

 The following modifications have been made to the Court's 

Opinion issued on August 23, 1999, to the above-entitled appeal 

and will appear as part of the final version of the opinion: 

 

 1. On page 7, line 16, the word "retrying" should be changed to 

"trying." 

 2. On page 40, second full paragraph, line 1, the word "retry" 

should be "try"; on 

 line 2, the word "retrial" should be "trial"; and on line 

6, the word "retrying" 

 should be changed to "trying." 

 3. On page 40, third full paragraph, line 4, the word "retried" 

should be changed 

 to "tried." 

 4. On page 41, line 1, the word "retry" should be changed to "try." 

 

 

 Very truly yours, 

 /s/ P. Douglas Sisk, 

 Clerk 

Dated: September 10, 1999
#### Whitted v. Butler

*Allen L. Feingold,*for plaintiff.

*George J. McConchie,*for defendant.

October 10, 1979

LABRUM, J.,

This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion for a protective order to prevent the discovery of statements by defendant made to defendant’s insurance carrier.

The question at issue requires interpretation of Rule 4003.4 of the revised discovery rules of the Pennsylvania Rules of Civil Procedure.

Suit in this matter was commenced on June 28, 1978, for personal injuries sustained as a result of an accident. On April 16, 1979, plaintiffs counsel forwarded to the attorney for defendant a letter requesting defendant to produce records for inspection and photocopying pursuant to the recent amendment to the Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant objected to the discovery regarding investigations, contents of the investigative file, and especially to statements given by defendant to his insurance company. Defense counsel stated that his objections were based on the attorney-client privilege, information obtained in anticipation of litigation, information as part of the attorney’s work product and information which is beyond the scope of the amended rules of discovery.
#### Knowlton vs. The Board of Supervisors of Rock County and others.

The decision of this court granting the motion for a rehearing in the case of *Kneeland vs. The City of Milwaukee,*was not intended to overrule or in any way affect its decision in *Knowlton vs. The 8u$e?'visors of Book*Coimty, 9 Wis., 410.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Boda*County.

*I. 0. Sloan,*for appellants.

*J. H. Knowlton,*for respondent.

*601October 11.

*By the Court,*

Paiwe, J.

This appeal was brought for the sole purpose of ascertaining whether the recent decision of this court, granting the motion for a rehearing in the case of *Kneeland vs. The City of Milwaukee,*ante, p. 454, was intended to overrule, or in any way affect, our decision in *Knowlton vs. The Supervisors of Bode County,*9 Wis., 410. We can only say that it was not. That motion was granted upon the ground that there had been a former decision of this court sustaining the validity of the very law in question, which we did not feel at liberty to overturn after it had been so long acted on. But we shall follow that decision no further than the exact point decided, that is, to sustain the validity of the act of 1854 taxing rail or plank roads.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
# C_2016276EN.01002101.xml

| 29.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 276/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/21

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.7917 — Boehringer Ingelheim/Sanofi Animal Health Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 276/02)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 8 June 2016, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration between Boehringer Ingelheim and Sanofi Animal Health Business. On 22 July 2016, the notifying party/ies informed the Commission that it/they withdrew its/their notification.

---
Page 1 of 5
 

 

 

Page 2 of 5
 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 3 of 5
 

Page 4 of 5
 

 

Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATION OF

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Joseph J. Meuse, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q Amendment No. 2 of Hudsons Grill International, Inc.;



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.







/s/ Joseph J. Meuse

Joseph J. Meuse

Title:  President

Date:  December 17, 2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2., that the Advisory Committee on Women Veterans will meet on May 19-21, 2015, in Room 930, at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 until 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday and Thursday and end at 3:00 p.m. on Wednesday. The meeting is open to the public.

The purpose of the Committee is to advise the Secretary of Veterans Affairs regarding the needs of women Veterans with respect to health care, rehabilitation, compensation, outreach, and other programs and activities administered by VA designed to meet such needs. The Committee makes recommendations to the Secretary regarding such programs and activities.

The agenda will include updates from the Veterans Health Administration, the Veterans Benefits Administration, and Staff Offices, as well as updates on recommendations from the 2012 and 2014 Reports of the Advisory Committee on Women Veterans.

No time will be allocated at this meeting for receiving oral presentations from the public. Interested parties should provide written comments for review by the Committee to Ms. Shannon L. Middleton, VA, Center for Women Veterans (00W), 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20420, or email at *00W@mail.va.gov,* or fax to (202) 273-7092. Any member of the public who wishes to attend the meeting or wants additional information should contact Ms. Middleton at (202) 461-      ( print page 16729)    6193. Because the meeting will be in a Government building, anyone attending must be prepared to show a valid photo I.D. Please allow 15 minutes before the meeting begins for this process.

Dated: March 25, 2015.

Jelessa Burney,

Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-07179 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-61009

Summary Calendar

Jelissa Vigne, As Guardian and Next Friend of 

Christopher Bias, Jr., a Minor for the Wrongful Death 

of Christopher Bias, Sr., Deceased and on Behalf of All 

Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Christopher Bias, Sr., 

Deceased, 

Plaintiff—Appellant,

versus

Ohio Security Insurance Company; Peewee Lee, doing 

business as Reliable Paving, 

Defendants—Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:18-CV-634

Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Costa, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 16, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-61009 Document: 00515825560 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/16/2021
No. 20-61009

2

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs and 

pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no error of law or 

reversible error of fact. The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED for 

essentially the same reasons articulated by that court.

Case: 20-61009 Document: 00515825560 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/16/2021
# United States Court of Appeals for **the Federal Circuit**

__________________________ November 9, 2011 ERRATA

______________________

2009-1589

__________________________ TYPHOON TOUCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DELL, INC. and LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC., Defendants-Appellees,

and

SAND DUNE VENTURES, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

and

TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMAT ION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee,

and

FUJITSU AMERICA, INC. (formerly known as Fujitsu Computer Systems Corporation), Defendant-Appellee,

and

PANASONIC CORPORATIO N OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee,

andAPPLE, INC., Defendant,

and

HTC AMERICA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

PALM, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

_____________________
Decided November 4, 2011 Precedential Opinion

_____________________
Please make the following changes:

Page 3, add attorneys and firms represented

J OHN F ULTON
, J R ., Malloy & Malloy, P.A., of Miami, Florida, for defendant-appellee San Dune Ventures, Inc. With him on the brief was J OHN C. M ALLOY
, III.
# C_2015097EN.01001101.xml

| 24.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 March 2015

(2015/C 97/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0912 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4555 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73180 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2804 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0561 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6275 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,374 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,75 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1215 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4220 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7924 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3938 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3667 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4628 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4314 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4956 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 208,50 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0633 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7812 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6460 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 168,69 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0320 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 48,845 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,3886 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,497 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4963 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3462 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,9572 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0912

JPY

Japanese yen

130,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4555

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73180

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2804

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0561

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6275

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,374

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,75

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1215

RON

Romanian leu

4,4220

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7924

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3938

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3667

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4628

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4314

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4956

KRW

South Korean won

1 208,50

ZAR

South African rand

13,0633

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7812

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6460

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 168,69

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0320

PHP

Philippine peso

48,845

RUB

Russian rouble

64,3886

THB

Thai baht

35,497

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4963

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3462

INR

Indian rupee

67,9572

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016320EN.01000601.xml

| 1.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 August 2016

(2016/C 320/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1132 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 115,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4432 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84806 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5159 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0957 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2765 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,026 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,34 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3533 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4575 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2931 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4806 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4583 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6357 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5353 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5181 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 243,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1731 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4311 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4785 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 786,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5519 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,975 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,6624 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,549 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6016 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,9424 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,5562 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1132

JPY

Japanese yen

115,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4432

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84806

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5159

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0957

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2765

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,026

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,34

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3533

RON

Romanian leu

4,4575

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2931

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4806

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4583

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6357

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5353

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5181

KRW

South Korean won

1 243,66

ZAR

South African rand

16,1731

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4311

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4785

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 786,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5519

PHP

Philippine peso

51,975

RUB

Russian rouble

72,6624

THB

Thai baht

38,549

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6016

MXN

Mexican peso

20,9424

INR

Indian rupee

74,5562

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---