alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

 

**Section      1350Certificate of Chief Financial Officer**

                    In connection with the Quarterly Report of Summus, Inc.  (the “Company”) on      Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities      and      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald T. Locke, the      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,      that:

                     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15      (d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                     2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the      Company.

 

 

| Date:                    August 12, 2005 | /s/              Donald T.              Locke                                                Donald T. LockeChief Financial              Officer |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of IMPSAT Fiber Networks on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ricardo A. Verdaguer, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the
best of my knowledge, that:



1. The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the registrant.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



Date: March 31, 2005



/s/    RICARDO A. VERDAGUERRicardo A. Verdaguer President and Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES HANTON,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 62 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2018, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474 

The Honorable Robert M. Summers 

Secretary, Maryland Department of the Environment 

1800 Washington Boulevard 

Baltimore, Maryland 21230 

Dear Secretary Summers: 

On October 15, 2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Maryland State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Maryland Department of the 

Environment. The SIP revision pertains to amendments to the control of gasoline and volatile 

organic compound storage and handling under COMAR 26.11.13. EPA has determined that the 

submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a Direct 

Final Rulemaking. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr, 

at (215) 814-2071. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 

 

 David Arnold, Acting Director 

 Air Protection Division 

cc: George S. Aburn, MDE 

Brian Hug, MDE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7107

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

BYRON JONES, a/k/a Carl Lee, a/k/a "B",

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, Senior

District Judge. (CR-92-153-P, CA-95-109-3-P)

Submitted: December 14, 1995 Decided: January 11, 1996

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Byron Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Robert James Conrad, Jr., Assistant

United States Attorney, Robert Jack Higdon, Jr., OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Jones, Nos. CR-92-153-P; CA-95-109-3-P (W.D.N.C. June 14, 1995). We

deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
      32.2




Section
      1350Certificate of Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and chief
      accounting officer)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Oasys Mobile, Inc.  (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Tracy T. Jackson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
      (d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the
      Company.






Date:       November
              17,
              2006
            /s/ Tracy
              T.
              JacksonTracy T. JacksonChief Financial Officer (principal financial
              and chief accounting
                officer)
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0381 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM203AD

MTCM 000 - 32 - 720 - 708, R21 --- 2/5/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Order entered November 29, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00996-CR

No. 05-15-01000-CR

GREGORY ACHILIKE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-60832-Q, F14-60833-Q

ORDER

The Court GRANTS the State’s November 24, 2016 motion for an extension of time to 

file the State’s brief.

We ORDER the Clerk of the Court to file the State’s brief tendered as of the date of this 

order.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
#### People *ex rel.*Thomas F. Gillane, Plffs. *v.*Woodman *et al.,*constituting the Commissioners of the Board of Excise, Defts.

*(Supreme Court*— *Chambers*— New *York County*

Filed *January*14, 1887.)

Excise Law — Building used for public amusement — When not a VALID GROUND FOR REFUSING AN EXCISE LICENSE.

The fact that a building is used during some part of the time as a place of public amusement affords of itself no valid ground for the refusal by the board of excise, of an excise license.

Motion for *mandamus*to compel the granting of an excise license to the New York Academy of Music.

*Seward, Da Oosta Gruthrie,*for relator; *Clarence W. Day- ■ ton*for defts.

Lawrence, J.

When a similar application was made by this relator last year, Mr. Justice Van Brunt, in granting the application, said [Reported, *People ex rel Gillaine*v. *Haughton 3*How. Pr. Rep., N. S., 135.] : “ An examination of this section shows that this restriction only applies to the hours during which the building is being used for public performances, and the selling of liquors at all other times in such a building is no violation of the act, and that the excise license is in no way affected by a violation of the prohibition contained in the act, the only license affected being the public amusement license. As, therefore, the sale of liquors in such a building in no way contravenes any statute during a large part of the time, and as the penalty for a violation of the Public Amusement Act effects the public amusement license only, andinno way affects the excise license, it seems clear to me that the fact that a building is used during some part of the time as a place of public amusement affords of itself no valid ground for the refusal of an excise license. If the licenseé violates the Public Amusement Act, that act fixes the penalty, which in no way relates to the rights conferred by the excise license.”

*319There has been no change in the law since that decision was rendered, which affects the question presented by this application.

The decision in the cases of *The Mayor, etc.,*v. *Eden Musee, etc., Co.. The Mayor, etc., v.*Gould and *The People ex rel. Hamlin v. The Board of Excise Commissioners*do not support the construction of the statute contended for by the respondent’s counsel, inasmuch as they relate to the construction to be giveh to the Public Amusement Act.,

For these reasons I am of the opinion that the motion for a peremptory writ of *mandamus*should be granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-K and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         109,699
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  202,163
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,804
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                       6,867,354
<DEPRECIATION>                               (461,792)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,662,667
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                      5,077,990
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    339,061
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,912,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,662,667
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,054,167
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  571,145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 5,992
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             287,823
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                203,133
<INCOME-TAX>                                   203,133
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            203,133
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     58
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   203,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
<FN>
<F1>The Operating Partnership does not report using a classified balance sheet.
</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1957

In Re: RANDY L. THOMAS, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:07-cv-00130-GCM) 

Submitted: October 2, 2009 Decided: November 3, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Randy L. Thomas, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Randy L. Thomas petitions for a writ of mandamus 

seeking an order to initiate disciplinary proceedings and impose 

sanctions against attorneys who represented an adverse party in 

a related case and urging this court to enforce its rules. We 

conclude that Thomas is not entitled to mandamus relief. 

Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner 

has a clear right to the relief sought. In re First Fed. Sav. & 

Loan Ass’n, 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, 

mandamus is a drastic remedy and should be used only in 

extraordinary circumstances. Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 

426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard, 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th 

Cir. 1987). 

The relief sought by Thomas is not available by way of 

mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.89
                              [LETTERHEAD OF CCI]

                                                  June 26, 2001

Mr. Jim Cassina, President
InvestorLinks.com, Inc.
2 Adelaide W., Suite 300
Toronto, Ontario Canada M541L6

                            Via Fax # 416.861.9623

Dear Jim:

     Thank you for your telephone call today. I am happy that we will evidently
be able to resolve the lease situation between Gilray, LLC and IL Data, a
subsidiary of InvestorLinks.com, Inc.

     As you know, IL Data entered into a lease for office space with Gilray,
LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company of which I am Managing Member. The
lease was for office space in Charlottesville, Virginia and was dated July 3,
2000 with a commencement date of August 1, 2001 and a termination date of July
31, 2003. Sometime in the last several weeks, IL Data vacated the lease premises
with the exception of a number of items of office furniture.

     You and I have discussed a scenario whereby Gilray, LLC will execute a
Certificate of Satisfaction releasing IL Data and/or InvestorLinks.com of any
further responsibility under the terms of the lease. Our agreement, reached
during today's telephone conversation, is as follows:

     1.   Gilray, LLC agrees to fully release you from any further liability
          under the subject lease in exchange for the lump sum payment of
          $18,000.00 in US Dollars.

     2.   The payment shall consist of the forfeiture of the security deposit
          presently held by Gilray, LLC in the amount of $2945.00 and a
          negotiable check issued by InvestorLinks.com to Gilray, LLC in the
          amount of $15,055.00.

     3.   InvestorLinks.com agrees to convey any and all interest in the
          furniture abandoned by the tenant to Gilray, LLC and Gilray, LLC may
          dispose of such furniture as its sole discretion.
<PAGE>

     Upon receipt of your acknowledgement of this settlement and the
aforementioned check, I will execute a Certificate of Satisfaction.

     I hope this captures the essence of our agreement. If so, please sign below
and fax a copy of this letter back to me. I will be available tomorrow and
Friday if we need to speak. I will be travelling on Thursday.

                                             Sincerely,


                                             /s/ George W. Ray, Jr.
                                             ----------------------
                                             George W. Ray, Jr.
                                             Managing Member
                                             Gilray, LLC


Approved: /s/ J. C. Cassina
         -------------------
         InvestorLinks.com


Date: 27 June, 2001
      ------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            1110
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       56
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0                                       
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    5305
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                5
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      5305
<SALES>                                            908
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   908
<CGS>                                              908
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (172)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (172)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0                                      
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016112EN.01000301.xml

| 30.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 March 2016

(2016/C 112/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1194 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4549 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78450 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2690 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0915 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4839 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,073 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,18 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2498 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4645 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2109 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4901 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4741 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6835 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6597 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5311 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 306,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,3156 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2873 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 957,16 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4712 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,869 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,7345 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,672 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0795 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5809 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,4743 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1194

JPY

Japanese yen

127,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4549

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78450

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2690

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0915

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4839

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,073

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,18

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2498

RON

Romanian leu

4,4645

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2109

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4901

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4741

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6835

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6597

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5311

KRW

South Korean won

1 306,67

ZAR

South African rand

17,3156

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2873

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 957,16

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4712

PHP

Philippine peso

51,869

RUB

Russian rouble

76,7345

THB

Thai baht

39,672

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0795

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5809

INR

Indian rupee

74,4743

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I,
Joseph W. Baty, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Weider Nutrition International, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
August 28, 2003

| | /s/JOSEPH W. BATY | 
| | ----------------- | 

| | Joseph W. Baty
Chief Financial Officer | 
| | -------------------------------------- | 

---

QuickLinks