alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 21.1

                                 IMRGLOBAL CORP.

                              List of Subsidiaries

         The subsidiaries of the Registrant are as follows:

IMRglobal Corp.                                     Organized in U.S.
IMRglobal Nevada Corp.                              Organized in U.S.
IMRglobal - Professional Partners, Inc.             Organized in U.S.
IMRglobal - Orion Consulting, Inc.                  Organized in U.S.
IMRglobal - Neverdahl-Loft & Associates, Inc.       Organized in U.S.
IMRglobal - Cinergi Consulting Partners, Inc.       Organized in U.S.
ECWerks, Inc.                                       Organized in U.S.
IMR Sub A Corp                                      Organized in U.S.
IMR Sub B Corp                                      Organized in U.S.
IMR Sub AB Corp.                                    Organized in U.S.
IMRglobal, LLC                                      Organized in U.S.
IMRglobal Ltd.                                      Organized in Canada
Information Management Resources (U.K.)
  Holding Company                                   Organized in United Kingdom
IMRglobal plc                                       Organized in United Kingdom
IMRglobal (NI) Limited                              Organized in United Kingdom
Lyon Consultants (UK) Ltd.                          Organized in United Kingdom
Atechsys International, Ltd.                        Organized in United Kingdom
IMRglobal, S.A.                                     Organized in France
Atechsys S.A.                                       Organized in France
IMRglobal France Holding SAS                        Organized in France
IMRglobal, Pty Ltd.                                 Organized in Australia
IMRglobal Corp., Ltd.                               Organized in Japan
IMRglobal (India) Limited                           Organized in India
Annika Electronics PVT. LTD.                        Organized in India
Movitone, Ltd.                                      Organized in India
Information Management Resources IOR, Ltd.          Organized in Mauritius
A2 Partners BV                                      Organized in the Netherlands
Atechsys Luxembourg S.A.                            Organized in Luxembourg
Atechsys GmbH                                       Organized in Germany


         Each company does business in the name listed above and/or as
"IMRglobal."
# C_2015154EN.01000201.xml

| 9.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7534 — EPH/E.ON Italia Coal and Gas Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 154/03)

On 30 April 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7534. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7534. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLIDT000000.L11200000.DD0000.241A.00; 4500069133]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of public meetings.

# SUMMARY:

In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA), the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Twin Falls District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

# DATES:

The Twin Falls District RAC will meet April 22, 2015, at the Sawtooth Best Western Inn, 2653 S. Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho 83338. The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and end no later than 3:00 p.m. The public comment period will take place from 9:10 a.m. to 9:40 a.m.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Heather Tiel-Nelson, Twin Falls District, Idaho, 2536 Kimberly Road, Twin Falls, Idaho 83301, (208) 736-2352.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The 15-member RAC advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of planning and management issues associated with public land management in Idaho. During the April 22nd meeting, there will be an overview of the roles and responsibilities of a BLM manager, an update on the Idaho and Southwest Montana Sub-regional Sage-Grouse Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and field office updates. Additional topics may be added and will be included in local media announcements.

                    More information is available at                     *www.blm.gov/​id/​st/​en/​res/​resource_​advisory.3.html.*                     RAC meetings are open to the public.                

Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4-1.

Elizabeth Maclean,

BLM Twin Falls District Manager (Acting).

[FR Doc. 2015-06912 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

RANDY ARLAN MAINWARING, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

No. 16-30084 

D.C. No. 6:09-cr-60105-MC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael J. McShane, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. 

Randy Arlan Mainwaring appeals from the district court’s judgment and 

challenges the 28-month sentence imposed upon his third revocation of supervised 

release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

Mainwaring contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. The 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

MAR 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-30084 

district court did not abuse its discretion in imposing Mainwaring’s sentence. See 

Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007). The above-Guidelines sentence is 

substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors and 

the totality of the circumstances, including Mainwaring’s repeated breaches of the 

court’s trust and his unsuitability for supervised release. See Gall, 552 U.S. at 51; 

United States v. Simtob, 485 F.3d 1058, 1062-63 (9th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-03T00:24:26Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-03T00:24:30Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-03T00:24:30Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="85598">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-03T00:24:26Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>. . . 
</p>
<p>i 
</p>
<p>*..,:...- 
</p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE AITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 
AUSTIN </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">Meese

Honorable Willian ae Lawson, Att'n: Mr. Lewis, Page 2 |

Section XI ef the last mentioned epplicetion far
Gharter, deted May 16, 10482, reads aa follows:

“The purpose for which it is forned is the
gratuitous ieprovesent of apiritual, mental,
sooial end physical condition of men and women,
by the nainteuanes oF lectures, eymbasivas, re~
oreational greundas asd secial meetings a8 au-
thorizeé by swdéiviaten 2 of article 1 of the

Texas Revised Civil Statutes of 1925.°

Under the autherities cited in opinions Nes. 06-3991
and 0-£008, copies of which ars enclosed herewith fer. your in-

formation, "4s de cur opinion thet swh proposed ebarter should
te refused by you.

We return herewith your file in the matter wanton you

sem; Us,
Very truly yours
ATTORESY GUVMAL GW Takase
, MEd Jems.
We. 7, Fanning
RIF? GO

| y APPROVEDMAY 24, Pepe

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

APPROVED

OPINION
COMMITTEE
B LP
CHAIRMAN

</div>

</div>
</body></html>
# C_2016199EN.01000402.xml

| 4.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 199/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 199/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8026 — Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria Colombia/RCI Banque/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 199/04)

On 30 May 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8026. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8026. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
1... This proceeding arises out Cause No. 2008-CI-13072, styled Brian Salmon and Christina Salmon v. Joseph

Charles Rubiola aka J.C. Rubiola, et al., pending in the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the

Honorable Martha Tanner presiding. However, the order complained of was signed by the Honorable John D. Gabriel,

presiding judge of the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas.

i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-09-00115-CV

IN RE Joseph Charles RUBIOLA a/k/a/ J.C. RUBIOLA, Gregory Allan RUBIOLA,

Catherine RUBIOLA, JGL DESIGN-BUILD, LLC a/k/a JGL DESIGN BUILD and

Michael CORTEZ, individually and d/b/a THE HEIGHTS DESIGN AND

CONSTRUCTION

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: March 4, 2009

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On February 24, 2009, relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for

emergency temporary relief. The court has considered relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and

is of the opinion that relators are not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ

of mandamus and the motion for emergency temporary relief are DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P.

52.8(a). 

PER CURIAM
# C_2016144EN.01000301.xml

| 23.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 April 2016

(2016/C 144/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1263 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4413 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78335 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1381 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0991 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2443 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,046 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,10 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3506 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4753 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1886 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4570 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4342 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7368 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6364 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5211 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 287,41 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,1846 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3159 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4900 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 871,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3943 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,658 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,2513 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,432 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0218 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6823 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,9425 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1263

JPY

Japanese yen

124,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4413

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78335

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1381

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0991

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2443

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,046

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,10

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3506

RON

Romanian leu

4,4753

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1886

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4570

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4342

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7368

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6364

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5211

KRW

South Korean won

1 287,41

ZAR

South African rand

16,1846

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3159

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4900

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 871,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3943

PHP

Philippine peso

52,658

RUB

Russian rouble

74,2513

THB

Thai baht

39,432

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0218

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6823

INR

Indian rupee

74,9425

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
April17, 2015
Birdseye Farming, Inc. 

### J. Michael Wilson 102 Plaza de Luke Square Clayton, NC 27527

Docket Operations, M-30 U.S. DepartmentofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Room W12-140 West Building Ground Floor Washington, DC 20590-0001

Re: Petition to Amend Exemption No. 12015 Issued to Birdseye Farming, Inc Pursuantto Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act (Docket No. FAA-2015-1399)

Dear Sir or Madam:

James Michael Wilson, President of Birdseye Farming, Inc. was issued Exemption No. 12015 on 2015 (hereinafter "the Exemption"), allowingoperation ofthe PrecisionHawk Hawkeye MK-l!l for a2:'iai data collection for precision agriculture and precision surveying. Birdseye hereby requests an amendmentto the Exemption to add an additional UAS vehicle thatfully complies with the conditions the Exemption.

The requested exemption would permit Birdseye Farmingto pursue its commercial interests in**prov!d'n;~** services to clients using a small advanced UAS in the following areas: Real Estate Marketing, Industrial, Special Events, Utility Inspection, Local and National Natural and Man Made Disaster, and Rescue. Birdseye Professionals states that all UAS flights will occurover private or controlled access property and will do so with the property owner's consent and knowledge and that only people who have consented orotherwise have agreed to be in the area where videographywill take place. Birdseye Farming seeks to operate the DJI Phantom 1, DJI Phantom 2 Vision, DJI Phantom 2 Visio;,+, Phantom 3 Professional and Advanced Models, and future Phantom iterations (hereinafter "Phantom'··) underthe same conditions and limitations contained in the Exemption. Birdseye Farming will revise its UAS Operations Manual to includethe DJI Phantom series. If requested, Birdseye Farming will submit a revised copy ofthe UAS Operations Manualtothe Administrator underseparate cover pursuantto 14 C.F.R. § 11.35(b), as the materials contain confidential commercial and/or proprietary information that Birdseye Farming has not and will not share with others. Additionally, the document contains conditions and proceduresthat are notgenerallyavailable to the public and are protected from 

### re:ease underthe Freedom of InformationAct, 5 U.S.C. § 552 et seq. All operations ofthe additional UAS 

### wili be in full compliance with the terms ofthe Exemption.

### Birdseye Farming believes that an amendment addingthe Phantom tothe Exemption is in the public's interest as itwould reduce hazards and emissions associated with alternate use ofmanned aircraftto conduct similar aerial data collection.
As this is an amendmentto an existing exemption seekingthe addition ofsupplementary UAS model that is substantially similartothe one currently authorized for use underthe Exemption, Birdseye Farming respectfully submits thatgood cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register forthe requested amendment.
ifyou have any questions, or need any additional information to process the requested amendmer:t cG 

### the Exemption, please do not hesitate to contactthe undersigned. Sincerely,

# t:ha~#Jm_ Birdseye Farming, Inc.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JOHN FRANKLIN WRIGHT, JR.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 584 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
---

---

EXHIBIT 10.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-116429), pertaining to On Track Innovations Ltd.s 2001 Share Option Plan,
2001 Employee Share Purchase Plan and 1995 Share Option Plan, Forms F-3 (File Nos.
333-111770, 333-115953 and 333-121316) and related Prospectus of On Track Innovations Ltd.
and its subsidiaries of
our report dated March 28, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
On Track Innovations Ltd. and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002
included in this Amendment No.1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|October 27 , 2005 | Luboshitz Kasierer                                
|----------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                  |                                                   
|Tel-Aviv, Israel  | An affiliate member of Ernst & Young International

80

---

---
NUMBER 13-16-00220-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

JEREMY JAY CUEVAS, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On Appeal from the 156th District Court

of Bee County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Garza, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Appellant’s brief was originally due on July 27, 2016. This Court has previously 

granted appellant three extensions of time to file the brief with the brief being due on 

October 17, 2016. On October 24, 2016, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant’s 

counsel that the brief had not been filed and requested a response concerning the failure 
2

to file the brief within ten days. Counsel has nevertheless failed to file either a response 

or an appellate brief in this matter.

Accordingly, we now ABATE this appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court 

for further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate 

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to make 

appropriate findings and recommendations concerning the following: (1) whether 

appellant desires to prosecute this appeal; (2) why appellant's counsel has failed to file a 

brief and whether counsel has effectively abandoned the appeal; (3) whether appellant 

has been denied effective assistance of counsel; (4) whether appellant's counsel should 

be removed; and (5) whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel.

If the trial court determines that appellant does want to continue the appeal, that 

present counsel should be removed, and that appellant is indigent and entitled to 

court-appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant 

in this appeal. If new counsel is appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and 

state bar number of said counsel shall be included in an order appointing counsel.

The trial court shall cause its findings and recommendations, together with any 

orders it may enter regarding the aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental 

clerk's record. Furthermore, the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record 

of any proceedings to be prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental 

reporter's record, if any, shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the 

expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.
3

PER CURIAM

Do not publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered and filed 

the 29th day of November, 2016.