alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted), Bruce D.Horn, Chief Financial Officer of Oplink Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifiesthat, to the best of his knowledge:**1.**The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “***Annual Report***”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;and**2.**The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition at the end of the period covered by the Annual Report and results of operationsof the Company for the periods covered by the Annual Report.**In Witness Whereof,**the undersigned has set his hands hereto as of the 15th day of September, 2006.   /s/ Bruce D. Horn   Bruce D. Horn  Chief Financial Officer  This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the SecuritiesAct of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before orafter the date of theForm 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.333-47928) of Oplink Communications, Inc. of our reports datedSeptember 14, 2006 relating to theconsolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of June 30, 2006 and 2005 andfor each of the two years in the period ended June 30, 2006, management’s assessment of theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2006, which appear inthis Form 10-K./s/ Burr, Pilger, & Mayer LLPPalo Alto, California
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David L. Osborn, the President of
Hudson's Grill International, Inc., certify that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | (Registrant)

HUDSON'S GRILL INTERNATIONAL,
INC.

By: s/s David L. Osborn

David L. Osborn, President

Date: August 14, 2006
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

f\sec\o01.060630
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                          -----------------------------

The Board of Directors
Deltic Timber Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No.
333-34317 and No. 333-76294) on Form S-8 of Deltic Timber Corporation of our
report dated February 8, 2002, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Deltic Timber Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and
the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001,
which report appears in the December 31, 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of
Deltic Timber Corporation.

KPMG LLP
Shreveport, Louisiana
March 22, 2001

                                      90
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3761

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Rena Shannell Kirk

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Davenport

____________

 Submitted: April 14, 2016

Filed: April 19, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, ARNOLD, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Rena Kirk challenges the reasonableness of the sentence the district court1

imposed upon revoking her supervised release. Upon careful review, we conclude

1

The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge, United States District Court for

the Southern District of Iowa.
that the revocation sentence is not unreasonable. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d

910, 915-16 (8th Cir. 2009) (discussing appellate review of revocation sentence); see

also United States v. Lazarski, 560 F.3d 731, 733 (8th Cir. 2009) (when court imposed

below-Guidelines-range sentence, it was “nearly inconceivable” that court abused its

discretion in not varying downward still further).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We also grant counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw.

______________________________

-2-
Exhibit
13.2




CARTHEW
BAY TECHNOLOGIES INC.




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Annual Report of Carthew Bay Technologies Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Brian D. Clewes, Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Brian D. ClewesBrian
      D. ClewesSecretary,
      Treasurer, and Chief Financial OfficerJune
      24, 2010
H

1/C13

– NMR and FT-IR Spectra for Certificate of Composition

 Sample ID – CIN 10082751 CR-109456 DEV82751R2 

H

1

-NMR

__25___ mg of test substance added to 1mL of CDCL3 in a 5 mm I.D tube

Spectra acquired using a Varian Mercury-Vx 300 MHz spectrometer (QOD# ATD/EP-OP-001)

C

13

-NMR

__100_____ mg of test substance added to 1 ml of CDCL3 in a 5 mm ID tube

Spectra acquired using a Varian Mercury-Vx 300 MHz spectrometer (QOD# ATD/EP-OP-001)

FT-IR

______2___ mg of test substance added to 200 mg KBr 

Spectra acquired using a Nicolet Nexus 470 spectrometer (EPP: ICAL-SOP-0190)

Spectra:

Number Type

(

1H, 1H/1H, 13C, D2O exchange)

Full Expanded Temperature

(oC)

Chemical

Shifts

1 H1 X R/T

2 H1 X R/T

3 C13 X R/T

4 C13 X R/T X

5 FT-IR X R/T

Results

The spectra are consistent with structure for CIN 10082751.

NH2

O NH

CH3

H3C CH3

Analyst Signature: __Bill Lewis____________________ Date: _March 30, 2011

 FPEG WW IC ROCH QUALITY/ANALYTICAL
H

1 NMR – Full Scale

phasefil.

11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0

Chemical Shift (ppm)

0

0.05

0.10

0.15

0.20

0.25

Normalized Intensity

TMS

CHLOROFORM-d

NH2

O NH

CH3

H3C CH3

H

1 NMR Expanded Scale

phasefil.

9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5

Chemical Shift (ppm)

0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06

0.07

0.08

0.09

0.10

0.11

0.12

Normalized Intensity

CHLOROFORM-d

NH2

O NH

CH3

H3C CH3
C

13 NMR Full Scale

phasefil.

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

Chemical Shift (ppm)

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Normalized Intensity

TMS

CHLOROFORM-d

NH2

O NH

CH3

CH3 H C3

C

13 NMR with Chemical shifts

phasefil.

180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0

Chemical Shift (ppm)

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

Normalized Intensity

TMS

CHLOROFORM-d

168.63

155.30

129.71 126.77

125.56

77.50

77.07

76.65

34.92

31.12

NH2

O NH

CH3

H3C CH3
FT-IR Spectrum as KBR Pellet

 2

 4

 6

 8

 10

 12

 14

 16

 18

 20

 22

 24

 26

 28

 30

 32

 34

%T

 3000 2000 1500 1000 800 600 

Wavenumbers (cm-1)
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Shirley Yin, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Oplink Communications, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: September 14, 2007                               /s/ Shirley Yin   Shirley Yin   Chief Financial Officer
..
-., '.'

. _. ' . ,----..-.. ~.,---"-_.'c , =- -'- -". ,- ' 0'-'. ...

. n----- '
"c-::--:

-----

u
# C_2014389EN.01002401.xml

| 4.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 389/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 389/24

---

Corrigendum to new national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 374 of 22 October 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 374 of 22 October 2014

2014/C 389/15

On page 3:

for:

for

‘Number of coins to be issued: 2 million’,

read:

read

‘Number of coins to be issued: 1 million’.

---
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 1071 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 070 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR - M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Home City Financial Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, J. William Stapleton, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer,
and Charles A. Mihal, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ J. William Stapleton                   /s/ Charles A. Mihal
----------------------------------         ----------------------------------
J. William Stapleton                       Charles A. Mihal
Chief Executive Officer and                Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Chief Operating Officer

March 24, 2004                             March 24, 2004
----------------                           --------------------
Date:                                      Date:

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Home City Financial Corporation and will be retained by Home City
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.

                                       84
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     9
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION EXTRACTED  FROM THE ANNUAL
REPORT ON FORM 10-KSB  FOR THE  FISCAL  YEAR  ENDED  DECEMBER  31,  1996  AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>


<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1996
<CASH>                                         579,271
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         8,735,014
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    28,782,425
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        35,943,469
<ALLOWANCE>                                    186,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 75,689,367
<DEPOSITS>                                     42,759,637
<SHORT-TERM>                                   0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            159,721
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,821
<OTHER-SE>                                     32,125,374
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 75,689,367
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                3,331,305
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,055,470
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               276,935
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               4,663,710
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,780,483
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             1,780,483
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          2,883,227
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  50,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (37,903)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                1,233,010
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,631,751
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,631,751
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,002,409
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 0
<LOANS-NON>                                    282,495
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,767,090
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               186,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  0
<RECOVERIES>                                   0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              186,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 27, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-10466 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v. MARK A SMITH Defendant - Appellant

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:05-CR-3

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Mark A. Smith appeals from the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm. Smith’s plea agreement contained an appeal waiver, which the Government seeks to enforce. Smith’s attempt to construe the sentencing court’s statements regarding his right to appeal as an interpretation of the appeal waiver provision lacks merit. The sentencing court’s erroneous statements regarding Smith’s right to appeal did not negate an otherwise knowing and voluntary waiver. See United States v. Gonzalez , 259 F.3d 355,No. 06-10466 -2- 358 (5th Cir. 2001). Moreover, the Government has not waived enforcement of that waiver. See United States v. Acquaye , 452 F.3d 380, 382 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Melancon , 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, Smith’s appeal seeking to challenge the district court’s application of a U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5) adjustment is barred by his appeal waiver.
See Melancon , 972 F.2d at 568.
AFFIRMED.
UNIROYAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

                                  EXHIBIT 21.1

                 Subsidiaries of Uniroyal Technology Corporation

         The following table sets forth, with respect to each subsidiary of the
Company, the state of organization and the percentage of voting securities
currently owned by the Company:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                Percentage of Voting Securities Directly or
Subsidiary Name                                     State of Organization             Indirectly Owned by the Company
---------------                                     ---------------------       -------------------------------------------
<S>                                                        <C>                                      <C>
Uniroyal Compound Semiconductors, Inc. (formerly
  known as Uniroyal Optoelectronics, Inc.)                 Delaware                                 100%
Uniroyal Optoelectronics, LLC                              Delaware                                 (a)
Sterling Semiconductor, Inc.                               Delaware                                 (a)
NorLux Corp.                                               Delaware                                 (a)
Uniroyal Optoelectronics Service Corporation               Delaware                                 (a)
BayPlas7, Inc.                                             Delaware                                 100%
Uniroyal Engineered Products, LLC                          Delaware                                 (b)
Uniroyal Liability Management Company, Inc.                Delaware                                 69%
BayPlas2, Inc.                                             Delaware                                 (c)
UnitechNJ, Inc.                                            Delaware                                 100%
UnitechOH, Inc.                                            Delaware                                 100%
BayPlas3, Inc.                                             Delaware                                 100%
Uniroyal HPP Holdings, Inc.                                Delaware                                 100%
High Performance Plastics, Inc.                            Delaware                                 (d)
</TABLE>


(a)      A wholly-owned subsidiary of Uniroyal Compound Semiconductors, Inc.

(b)      Ownership  is as  follows:  98% owned by  BayPlas7,  Inc.,  1% owned by
         Uniroyal Compound Semiconductors, Inc. and 1% owned by the Company.

(c)      A wholly-owned  subsidiary of Uniroyal  Liability  Management  Company,
         Inc.

(d)      A wholly-owned subsidiary of Uniroyal HPP Holdings, Inc.