alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,663
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,790
<ALLOWANCES>                                       100
<INVENTORY>                                     11,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,286
<PP&E>                                           4,987
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,327
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  42,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,936
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       112,331
<OTHER-SE>                                    (143,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    42,121
<SALES>                                         90,806
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,806
<CGS>                                           44,214
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,214
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,069
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,359
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             12,341
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (3,327)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .50
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southeastern Banking Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Cornelius P. Holland, III, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CORNELIUS P. HOLLAND, IIICornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO




/s/ ALYSON G. BEASLEYAlyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer




Date: August 15, 2005
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Annual Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”) on
Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Bruce
J. Haber, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.








April
      15, 2009/s/
              Bruce J. HaberBruce
      J. HaberChief
      Executive Officer
# C_2014159EN.01000101.xml

| 26.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 159/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 159/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 159/01

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 151, 19.5.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 142, 12.5.2014

OJ C 135, 5.5.2014

OJ C 129, 28.4.2014

OJ C 112, 14.4.2014

OJ C 102, 7.4.2014

OJ C 93, 29.3.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION – Chief Executive Officer**

I, Alan B. Miller,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Health Services, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 6, 2009
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

June 23, 2009 

d0615 

Order 

 

June 23, 2009 

136586(53) 

136588(53) 

FRANK RICHARD JACOBSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136586 

 COA: 281587 

Washtenaw CC: 06-000289-CH 

NORFOLK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________________________/ 

FRANK RICHARD JACOBSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 136588 

 COA: 283361 

Washtenaw CC: 06-000289-CH 

NORFOLK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 30, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
# C_2016064EN.01000201.xml

| 19.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7894 — Cinven/ERGO Italia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 64/02)

On 9 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7894. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7894. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7353

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff – Appellee, 

v. 

RAJENDRASINH BABUBAHAI MAKWANA, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:09-cr-00043-JFM-1; 1:13-cv-00058-JFM) 

Submitted: February 28, 2014 Decided: March 6, 2014

Before GREGORY, Circuit Judge, and HAMILTON and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Rajendrasinh Babubahai Makwana, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Michael 

Cunningham, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Rajendrasinh Babubahai Makwana seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit 

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner 

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists 

would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Makwana has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# C_2014407EN.01000401.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 407/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 407/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 November 2014

2014/C 407/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2436 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 144,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4434 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2376 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2015 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4530 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,653 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,12 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2295 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4275 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7905 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4336 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4155 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6436 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5829 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6158 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 372,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,9236 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6230 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6703 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 207,35 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1769 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,010 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 58,8280 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,865 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2610 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9441 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,8735 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2436

JPY

Japanese yen

144,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4434

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79440

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2376

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2015

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4530

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,653

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,12

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2295

RON

Romanian leu

4,4275

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7905

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4336

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4155

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6436

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5829

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6158

KRW

South Korean won

1 372,11

ZAR

South African rand

13,9236

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6230

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6703

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 207,35

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1769

PHP

Philippine peso

56,010

RUB

Russian rouble

58,8280

THB

Thai baht

40,865

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2610

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9441

INR

Indian rupee

76,8735

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014396EN.01000101.xml

| 11.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 396/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 396/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7352 — GDF Suez/SOPER/Natixis/LCS1/LCS2/LCS5/LCS9/LCSGO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 396/01

On 3 November 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7352. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7352. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016034EN.01001801.xml

| 29.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/18

---

Corrigendum to Directorate-General for Competition (COMP) — Publication of the post of Chief Competition Economist (grade AD 14) — Engagement of a Temporary Agent under Article 2(a) of Conditions of Employment of Other Servants — COM/2015/10363

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 407 A of 8 December 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 407 A of 8 December 2015

(2016/C 34/10)

On page 4, ‘Closing date’, first paragraph:

for:

for:

‘The closing date for registration is 29 January 2016, 12.00 noon Brussels time, after which online registrations will not be possible anymore.’,

read:

read:

‘The closing date for registration is prolonged to 10 February 2016, 12.00 noon Brussels time, after which online registrations will not be possible anymore.’.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

SHEILA LLOYD - THE BENEFACTOR (A 

LIVING WOMAN), 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

PENNYMAC CORP. ET AL; PHELAN, 

HALLINAN, DIAMOND & JONES, ET AL., 

 Respondents 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 83 EM 2016 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of July, 2016, the Application for Extraordinary and 

King’s Bench Jurisdiction is DENIED. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
GARY R. HERBERT Governor SPENCERJ. COX Lieutenant Governor Julie Fisher ExecutiveDirector

Departmentof Heritage & Arts October 6, 2015

Gerardo C. Rios Brad Westwood Director

Chief, Air Permits Office Air Division United States Environmental Protection Agency Region IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105 RE: Section 106 Consultation

- McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility, San Juan County, Utah For future correspondence, please reference Case No. 15-1333 Dear Mr. Rios: The Utah State Historic Preservation Office received your request for our comment on the above-referenced undertaking on October 5, 2015. We concur with your determination ofeffect for this undertaking. This letter serves as our comment on the determinations you have made, within the consultation process specified in §36CFR800.4. 

### Ifyou have questions, please contact me at 801-245-7263. 

# ir;r·**~~ tt,Ph.D.**  Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Archaeology cmerritt@utah.gov



## •n l HUtah o:partmen&t ofAr 300

### s. Rio Grande Street. SaltLake City, Utah 84101.(801) 245-7225.facsimile (801) 355-0587. hjstocy utah gov • eritage ts
---

---

Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Orckit Communications Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Eric
Paneth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

June 22, 2009

| |  | By:      /s/ Eric Paneth
Eric Paneth, Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
----

----

| 1.  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of On Track Innovations Ltd.; and |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Tanir Horn                         |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Tanir Horn                             |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer of the Company |

----

----
# C_2016069EN.01000101.xml

| 23.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7929 — Mitsubishi Corporation/KKR/South Staffordshire Plc)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 69/01)

On 17 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7929. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7929. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---