alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Carpinteria, California

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-64133) on Form S-8 of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our
report dated April 4, 2000 relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries, as
amended by Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) of Turbodyne Technologies Inc. and
subsidiaries.

Our report, date April 4, 2000, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered net losses in each of the last four years, has
used cash in its operating activities in each of the last four years, has
disposed of its most significant subsidiary through bankruptcy, is subject to a
lawsuit brought against it by shareholders, and based on the Company's projected
cash flows for the ensuing year it will be required to seek additional equity or
debt financing in order to continue its present operations. These matters raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of these uncertainties.


/s/ McGOWAN GUNTERMANN
----------------------------
McGowan Guntermann

Santa Barbara, California
August 9, 2000



                                    Page 18
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Josephine M. Donaldson, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Bronx County,

January 12, 1938.

*O. H. Droege,*for Will Donaldson, as executor, etc., petitioner.

*Ira H. Buhen,*special guardian.

Henderson, J.

The decedent made her last will on March 14, 1930. She died on December 27, 1933, and her will has been duly admitted to probate in this court. The testatrix was survived by her .husband and their son, who was born after she made her will.

After a gift of her entire estate to her husband, the will provides for alternative distributions in the event that he predeceased her, as follows:

*“Fourth.*If my husband should die before me, then I give, devise and bequeath all my property unto my issue me surviving, share and share alike, *per stirpes*and not *per capita.*

*“ Fifth.*In the event that I should die leaving no husband and no issue me surviving, then I direct that all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate shall be divided into seven equal parts.” Bequests of these seven parts to various individuals are made in succeeding paragraphs of the will.

*662The after-born child was unprovided for by any settlement, and if he is neither provided for nor in any way mentioned in the above-quoted paragraphs of the will he is entitled to two-thirds of the net estate. (Dec. Est. Law, § 26.)

It has frequently been said that no will has a brother. The above-quoted paragraphs, however, are akin to the pertinent language of the will under discussion in *Holbrook*v. *Holbrook*(193 App. Div. 286; affd., 230 N. Y. 600.) There it was held that mention of a posthumous daughter, sufficient to bar her from the benefits of the above-cited statute, was made in her father’s will by a similar alternative provision for his *“*lawful issue ” conditioned upon the death of his wife prior to his death and by similar provisions for alternative gifts to others if his wife predeceased him and he “ should not leave any lawful issue me surviving.”

In the will before me the testatrix clearly expressed her intention to bar all her children, whenever bom, from participation in her estate if her husband survived her, and in the event of his death before her to give her residuary estate to her surviving issue, including such children, *per stirpes.*

The after-born son is mentioned in his mother’s will as provided by the statute and he is not entitled to any share or interest in her estate. (See *Matter of Dooling,*158 Misc. 333, and cases cited therein.)

The special guardian’s request for time to file objections which he specifies in his report is proper. It must be denied, however, because his ward is not interested ip the estate and may not object to the account.

Settle decree.
Exhibit 32.2

 

Certification of Principal Accounting Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

 

I, Ed Bailey, Chief Accounting Officer of LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period September 30, 2007 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

 

 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

|   | By:  /s/ Ed Bailey |
|--------|--------------------|

|   | ----------------------------------- |
|--------|-------------------------------------|

|   | Ed Bailey |
|--------|-----------|

|   | Chief Accounting Officer |
|--------|--------------------------|

 

January 25, 2008

 

* A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and will be retained by LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-82,531]


Apex Tool Group, LLC, A Subsidiary of Bain Capital, North 
American Hand Tools Operations, Including On-Site Leased Workers From 
1st Employment Staffing, TEC Staffing Services and Kelly Staffing 
Services, Springdale, Arkansas; Amended Certification Regarding 
Eligibility To Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with Section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment Assistance 
on April 8, 2013, applicable to workers of Apex Tool Group, LLC, a 
subsidiary of Bain Capital, North American Hand Tools Operations, 
including on-site leased workers from TEC Staffing Services and Kelly 
Staffing Services, Springdale, Arkansas. The Department of Labor 
published the Notice of Determination in the Federal Register on May 
15, 2013 (78 FR 28636).
    At the request of the company official, the Department reviewed the 
certification for workers of the subject firm. The workers were engaged 
in activities related to the production of tool set kits and 
horseshoes.
    The company reports that workers leased from 1st Employment 
Staffing were on-site at the Springdale, Arkansas location of Apex Tool 
Group, LLC. The Department has determined that these workers were 
sufficiently under the control of the subject firm to be considered 
leased workers.
    Based on these findings, the Department is amending this 
certification to include workers leased from 1st Employment Staffing 
working on-site at the Springdale, Arkansas location of Apex Tool 
Group, LLC.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-82,531 is hereby issued as 
follows:

    All workers of Apex Tool Group, LLC, a subsidiary Of Bain 
Capital, North American Hand Tools Operations, including on-site 
leased workers from 1st Employment Staffing, TEC Staffing Services 
and Kelly Staffing Services, Springdale, Arkansas, who became 
totally or partially separated from employment on or after March 6, 
2012 through April 8, 2015, and all workers in the group threatened 
with total or partial separation from employment on the date of 
certification through two years from the date of certification, are 
eligible to apply for adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title 
II of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended.


    Signed in Washington, DC, this 10th day of March, 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-06837 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
# C_2015274EN.01000102.xml

| 19.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7575 — Iridium Concesiones de Infraestructuras/Aberdeen Infrastructure/Concessionaria Hospital Universitari Son Espases)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 274/02)

On 8 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in Spanish language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7575. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7575. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016144EN.01001901.xml

| 23.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/19

---

Special Report No 12/2016

‘Agencies’ use of grants: not always appropriate or demonstrably effective’

(2016/C 144/08)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 12/2016 ‘Agencies’ use of grants: not always appropriate or demonstrably effective’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 275 

To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare part A benefit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2021 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself and Mr. PAUL) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To allow individuals to choose to opt out of the Medicare 

part A benefit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retirement Freedom 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO CHOOSE TO OPT OUT 

7 OF THE MEDICARE PART A BENEFIT. 

8 Any individual who is otherwise entitled to benefits 

9 under part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act may 

10 elect (in such form and manner as may be specified by 

11 the Secretary of Health and Human Services) to opt out 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 275 IS

1 of such entitlement. Notwithstanding any other provision 

2 of law, in the case of an individual who makes such an 

3 election, such individual— 

4 (1) may (in such form and manner as may be 

5 specified by the Secretary) subsequently choose to 

6 end such election and opt back into such entitlement 

7 (in accordance with a process determined by the 

8 Secretary) without being subject to any penalty; 

9 (2) shall not be required to opt out of benefits 

10 under title II of such Act as a condition for making 

11 such election; and 

12 (3) shall not be required to repay any amount 

13 paid under such part A for items and services fur14 nished prior to making such election. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
{"id":12717,"count":39,"description":"The technologies that allow NASA to talk to and navigate spacecraft are often overlooked \u2014 perhaps because they work so well. Join us as we shine a light on the invisible networks that power space science and exploration.","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/invisible-network\/","name":"The Invisible Network","slug":"invisible-network","taxonomy":"series","meta":[],"rss_feeds":{"apple":"https:\/\/podcasts.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/the-invisible-network\/id1439034326","google":"https:\/\/podcasts.google.com\/feed\/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubmFzYS5nb3YvcnNzL2R5bi9JbnZpc2libGUtTmV0d29yay5yc3M","soundcloud":"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/nasa\/sets\/the-invisible-network","drupal":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/rss\/dyn\/Invisible-Network.rss","native":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/feeds\/podcasts\/invisible-network"},"endpoint":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series\/12717","exclude_from_main":true,"featured_media":406906,"featured_image":{"file":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/newtheinvisiblenetwork.png","alt":"The cover art for the "The Invisible Network" podcast"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series\/12717"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/series"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?series=12717"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1809

DANIEL HUBERT ROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARYLAND STATE POLICE LICENSING DIVISION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. 

(8:15-cv-01402-TDC)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Hubert Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Holdsworth Bowen, 

Assistant Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Hubert Ross appeals the district court’s orders 

granting Defendant’s motion to dismiss and denying Ross leave to 

amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by 

the district court. Ross v. Md. State Police Licensing Div., 

No. 8:15-cv-01402-TDC (D. Md. Mar. 23, 2016 & June 28, 2016). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
MEMORANDUM

DATE: August 3, 2011

SUBJECT: Use of Non

- Conventional Spray Technology in the Wood Furniture

Manufacturing Industry

FROM: Nicholas Swanson, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/NRG

TO: Docket No.: EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0786

Under the authority of 112(d)(6) of the Clean Air Act, EPA is promulgating a ban on conventional spray devices when overspray is not routed to an add

- on control device. The implementation of this standard disallows automated and handheld spray devices that have a nozzle pressure greater than 10 pounds per square inch ( psi )

. The definition of “conventional spray” w as defined in the 1995 Wood Furniture Manufacturing NESHAP:

“A spray coating method in which the coating is atomized by mixing it with compressed air and applied at an air pressure great er than 10 pounds per square inch (gauge) at the point of atomization. Airless and air assisted airless spray technologies are not conventional air spray because the coating is not atomized by mixing it with compressed air. Electrostatic spray technology i s also not considered conventional air spray because an electrostatic charge is employed to attract the coating to the workpiece.” 40 CFR 63.801(a).

In lieu of ban of conventional spray guns under most circumstances , wood furniture manufacturers will need to replace conventional spray guns within the three year compliance date. Most guns within the industry will likely need to be replaced in that time frame and the use of higher spray efficiency devices will effectively take their place. If there are still operating conventional spray guns at the end of the three year compliance time, they will also need to be replaced with high efficiency spray devices.

EPA expects most conventional spray guns to be replaced with high

- volume, low

pressure ( HVLP ) spray gun s. For small batches and touch

- up work

, HVLP cup guns can be used to ensure that small batches can be mixed. The use of HVLP cup guns will prevent large amounts of excess mixed coatings potentially go ing to waste. The price of an HVLP gun is considered t o be comparable to the price of a conventional spray gun. By changing from a conventional spray gun to a higher efficiency spray applicator will save costs on coating overspray.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6835

SHAIN CLAUDE COLLINS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief 

District Judge. (7:13-cv-00474-GEC)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shain Claude Collins, Appellant Pro Se. Craig Stallard, 

Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Shain Claude Collins seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Collins argued 

in his notice of appeal, and the record suggests, that he did 

not timely receive notice of the entry of the district court’s 

order, and further requested a reopening of the appeal period. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6)(A). Because the 30-day appeal 

period is jurisdictional, Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 

(2007), we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing 

the district court to determine whether to reopen the time to 

file an appeal, pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

REMANDED
Exhibit 99.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

I, Daniel A. France, certify that:

1.) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Kushi Natural Foods
Corp.

2.) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:
a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
c. Presented in the quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5.) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the Audit committee
of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
a. All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;

6.) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ DANIEL A. FRANCE
------------------------------
Daniel A. France, Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer)

                                       11