alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### COLO:RADO Depar:tment ofPubUc Health & Environment Dedicatedto protecting'and improvingthe health and.environment of the people of Colorado.

Octeber 7, 2015 Linda Kiefer Remediation Project Manager U.S. EPA, Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR-SR) Denver, CO 80202 

### RE: CDPHE Concurrence on Partial Deletion ofOperable Unit 1 ofthe**Calif~rnia** 

### Gulch Superfund Site
Dear Ms. Kiefer: The Colorado Department ofPublic Health and Environment (CDPHE) has reviewed boththe Notice oflntentfor Partial Deletion and the directfmal Notice ofPartial Deletion for Operable Unit 1 (Yak Tunnel/Water Treatment Plant) ofthe California Gulch Superfund Site. ·· EPA and the State have determined that all appropriate response actiens under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

### Lia:bility Act (CERCLA), have been**completed~** otherthan operations and maintenance, monitoring, and five-year reviews. Operations and maintenance, including**moni~oring** activities, are the responsibility ofResurrection/Newmont (the 

### PRP), with oversight from EPA and the State. Furthermore, institutional controls (ICs) are 

### in place in the form ofenvironmental covenants in order to ensure long•term protectiveness ofthe remedy. EPA will continue to conduct five-year reviews. Therefore, CDPHE agreesthat all necessary actions have been taken to delete Operable Unit 

### 1 ofthe California Gulch Superfund Site from the National Priorities List. Sincerely, , .



## /) ":''-/

## //~ 

## C. !arit/z

# U~-r.~;r4(?,_ Gary

# B~hman ;.) Director Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division

cc: Jennifer Robbins, AGO Doug Jamison, CDPHE Monica Sheets, CDPHE

4300 Cherry Creek DriveS., Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692·2000 .www.colorado.gov/cdphe John 

### w. Hickenlooper, Governor 1 Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH, Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer
# C_2016257EN.01000201.xml

| 15.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 July 2016

(2016/C 257/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1157 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4378 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83311 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4413 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0900 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3247 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,049 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,64 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4115 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4903 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2223 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4588 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4422 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6538 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5474 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4978 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 262,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,8563 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4577 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5116 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 562,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3816 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,436 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,4687 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,115 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6041 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3522 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,5940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1157

JPY

Japanese yen

117,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4378

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83311

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4413

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0900

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3247

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,049

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,64

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4115

RON

Romanian leu

4,4903

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2223

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4588

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4422

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6538

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5474

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4978

KRW

South Korean won

1 262,25

ZAR

South African rand

15,8563

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4577

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5116

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 562,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3816

PHP

Philippine peso

52,436

RUB

Russian rouble

70,4687

THB

Thai baht

39,115

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6041

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3522

INR

Indian rupee

74,5940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014334EN.01000101.xml

| 25.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7361 — Kaindl/DB ML/CTE)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 334/01)

On 11 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7361. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7361. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
JORGE TELLEZ,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0969

Opinion filed November 7, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Jorge Tellez, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida 

Commission on Offender Review, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

ROWE, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
Located at:

http://www.spe.org/about/
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07021]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Special Medical Advisory Group; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2, that the Special 
Medical Advisory Group (Group) will meet on May 13, 2015, in Room 830 
at VA Central Office, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC, from 8:30 
a.m. to 3:45 p.m. The meeting is open to the public.
    The purpose of the Group is to advise the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs and the Under Secretary for Health on the care and treatment of 
disabled Veterans, and other matters pertinent to the Department's 
Veterans Health Administration (VHA).
    The agenda for the meeting will include clarification of the roles 
and expectations for the reconstituted Group, the current state of the 
VA presented by the Interim Under Secretary of Health, discussion 
regarding various options/enhancements available to VA to provide 
quality care and access to Veterans, and a discussion regarding the 
Interagency Collaborations between Department of Defense and VA to 
provide quality care and access for transitioning Servicemembers/
Veterans.
    There will be time for public comment from 3:00 p.m. until 3:30 
p.m.; however, members of the public may also submit written statements 
for review by the Group to Barbara Hyduke, Designated Federal Officer, 
Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Patient Care Services (10P4), 
Veterans Health Administration, 810 Vermont Avenue NW., Washington, DC 
20420, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#81c3e0f3e3e0f3e0afc9f8e5f4eae4c1f7e0afe6eef7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="74361506161506155a3c0d10011f113402155a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>. Because the meeting is 
being held in a government building, a photo I.D. must be presented at 
the Guard's Desk as a part of the clearance process; therefore, you 
should allow an additional 15 minutes before the meeting begins for a 
security check. Any member of the public wishing to attend the meeting 
or seeking additional information should contact Ms. Hyduke at (202) 
461-7800 or by email.

    Dated: March 23, 2015.
Rebecca Schiller,
Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-07021 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 4.3


                                    GUARANTY

         THIS GUARANTY is executed as of ________________, 1996, by Striker
Industries, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Guarantor"), for the benefit of
each holder (a "Holder") of the Convertible Subordinated Promissory Notes (each
a "Note") issued by West Oxford Industries, Inc. (The "Borrower").

         Guarantor guarantees to Holder the prompt payment at maturity (by
acceleration or otherwise), and at all times thereafter, of the Guaranteed Debt
(defined below), as follows:

         1. "Guaranteed Debt" shall mean the Notes, including all principal and
interest payable thereon. Unless otherwise stated, terms defined in the Note
have the same meanings when used in this Guaranty.

         2. If Guarantor becomes liable for any indebtedness owing by Borrower
to Holder, other than under this Guaranty, such liability will not be in any
manner impaired or affected by this Guaranty, and the rights of Holder under
this Guaranty are cumulative of any and all other rights that Holder may ever
have against Guarantor. The exercise by Holder of any right or remedy under this
Guaranty or otherwise will not preclude the concurrent or subsequent exercise of
any other right or remedy.

         3. Holder shall notify Guarantor in writing of any Default or Potential
Default prior to exercising any remedies for such Default and Guarantor shall
have the right to cure any such Default or Potential Default within thirty
Business Days after receiving any such notice. If, while a Default exists,
Borrower fails to pay the entire unpaid balance of the Obligation then due and
payable and Guarantor fails to cure such Default within thirty Business Days
after receiving notice of such Default from Holder, then Guarantor shall, on
demand and without further notice of dishonor and without any notice having been
given to Guarantor previous to such demand of either the acceptance by Holder of
this Guaranty or the creation or incurrence of any Guaranteed Debt, pay the
amount of the Guaranteed Debt then due and payable to Holder, and it is not
necessary for Holder, in order to enforce such payment by Guarantor, first or
contemporaneously to institute suit or exhaust remedies against Borrower or
others liable on such indebtedness or to enforce rights against any collateral
securing such indebtedness.

         4. This Guaranty benefits Holder and its successors and permitted
assigns and binds Guarantor and its successors and permitted assigns. The rights
and benefits of the Guaranty may not be transferred.

                                                STRIKER INDUSTRIES, INC.


                                                By: /s/ David A. Collins
                                                   -------------------------
                                                Name:  David A. Collins

                                                Title:  President and CEO
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

LUIS CASTRUITA,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-16-00030-CR

Appeal from the

168th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20140D02055)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is the Appellant’s motion to supplement the reporter’s record 

with the transcription of the motion to suppress that was held on September 24, 2015. See

TEX.R.APP.P. 34.6(d). The Appellant’s motion is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court 

ORDERS Lisa De Mello, Roving Court Reporter for the 168th District Court, of El Paso County,

Texas, to electronically submit a supplemental reporter’s record containing the transcription of 

the motion to suppress that was held on September 24, 2015 to this Court on or before December 

14, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of November, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, J. Michael Dodson, Chief Financial Officer of DDi Corp. (the Company) certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



/s/    J. MICHAEL DODSONJ. Michael DodsonChief Financial Officer


Date: April 28, 2011
# C_2016028EN.01000401.xml

| 26.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 28/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Italy

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 550th Anniversary of the death of Donatello

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : Head of the David by Donatello (detail of the bronze sculpture kept in Florence, National Museum of Bargello): on the left the logo of the Italian Republic ‘RI’; below on two lines, ‘1466’ and ‘2016’; on the right ‘C.M.’, the initials of the author Claudia Momoni; below ‘DONATELLO’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : March 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of vFinance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan B. Levin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





                                                 /s/ Alan B. Levin
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Alan B. Levin
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
                                                 March 12, 2008
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT



BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS
INTELIDATA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.
333-16115, No. 333-16117 and No. 333-16121) on Form S-8 of InteliData
Technologies Corporation of our report dated February 5, 1996, relating to the
consolidated balance sheet of InteliData Technologies Corporation as of December
31, 1995, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders'
equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended December 31, 1995, which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual
report on Form 10-K of InteliData Technologies Corporation.


                                                /s/ KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


                                                KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


Washington, D.C.
March 28, 1997
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO PEREZ, 

Petitioner-Appellant,

 v.

K. HOLLAND, 

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 14-55815

D.C. No.

2:14-cv-02638-CJC-MAN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 10, 2016*

Pasadena, California

Before: BERZON and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and ZOUHARY,** District 

Judge.

Francisco Perez appeals the district court dismissal of his petition filed 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the ground that it was an unauthorized “second or 

successive” habeas petition. When the district court dismissed his petition on April 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Jack Zouhary, United States District Judge for the 

Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

FILED

NOV 28 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

14, 2014, it referred the petition to this court pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 22–

3(a) (rev. July 1, 2013) (“If a second or successive petition or motion, or an 

application for authorization to file such a petition or motion, is mistakenly 

submitted to the district court, the district court shall refer it to the court of 

appeals.”). We now accept that referral and grant authorization for Perez to file a 

“second or successive” habeas petition in district court because he has made a 

prima facie showing that his application satisfies the requirements of the 

Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA). See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2244(b)(3)(A)–(C); Jones v. Ryan, 733 F.3d 825, 842 (9th Cir. 2013).

Perez relies on the previously unavailable and retroactively applicable new 

rule of constitutional law announced in Miller v. Alabama that “mandatory life 

without parole for juveniles violates the Eighth Amendment.” 132 S.Ct. 2455, 

2473 (2012). The government does not dispute that Perez’s petition is timely. See 

Orona v. United States, 826 F.3d 1196, 1199 (9th Cir. 2016) (“[W]e conclude that 

the filing of a second or successive application in our court tolls the 1-year statute 

of limitations, and that the limitations period remains tolled until our court rules on 

the application.”).

We hereby order that Perez’s petition be transferred to the United States 
3 

District Court for the Central District of California. The petition shall be deemed 

filed in the district court on the date on which the habeas application signed by 

Perez on March 31, 2014, was delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the 

court. See Hernandez v. Spearman, 764 F.3d 1071, 1074 (9th Cir. 2014) (habeas 

petition is considered filed at the time it is delivered to prison authorities). 

Because we grant the previously referred application for authorization to file 

a “second or successive” habeas petition, this appeal has been rendered moot and 

we do not address the certified issue raised on appeal. We leave it to the district 

court to address the merits in the first instance.

GRANTED.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<MULTIPLIER>  1
       
<S>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>           9 MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996     
<CASH>                                  17,097
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                          141,501
<ALLOWANCES>                               0
<INVENTORY>                                0
<CURRENT ASSETS>                       158,598
<PP&E>                                     0
<DEPRECIATION>                             0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         158,598
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   20,217
<BONDS>                                    0
<COMMON>                                 1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                             137,381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           158,598
<SALES>                                  9,114
<TOTAL REVENUES>                         9,114
<CGS>                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         5,837 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          3,277
<INCOME-TAX>                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      3,277    
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0

<NET-INCOME>                             3,277
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0
           
   
</TABLE>