alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2770 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2770

To require the Secretary of State to designate the Taliban as a foreign 
                        terrorist organization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2021

  Mr. Cotton introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of State to designate the Taliban as a foreign 
                        terrorist organization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF THE TALIBAN AS A FOREIGN TERRORIST 
              ORGANIZATION.

    The Secretary of State shall designate the Taliban as a foreign 
terrorist organization in accordance with section 219 of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).
                                 <all>
```
_______________________________________ __ __________________________________ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 25, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly 130641(60) Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices EULA WASHINGTON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lisa B. Griffin, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 130641 v COA: 253777 Wayne CC: 03-330934-NM SINAI HOSPITAL OF GREATERDETROIT, d/b/a SINAI-GRACE HOSPITAL, DETROIT MEDICAL CENTER, DR. KUNTA, THOMAS PISKOROWSKI, D.O., and DR. AL-SAYAD, Defendants-Appellants.

On order of the Chief Justice, th e motion by the Michigan State Medical Society for leave to file a brief amicus curiae in this case is considered and it is

GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 25, 2006

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
balance sheet and statements of operations found on pages F-3 and F-4 of the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             904
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0 
<INVENTORY>                                          0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   904     
<PP&E>                                               0 
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,129     
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              228
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           125
<OTHER-SE>                                         776 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,129   
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,599
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,599)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0

</TABLE>
a-366 

_ . 

THE ATTO~WEY GENERAL 

, ' ; OF TEXAS 

Hon. Run L. IutchlaroIl *Inlen II., V-164 

Calmty Attorney 

Belile coupty 

Jhton, TMas 

‘R6a Authority l S the O-rslrnera ’ Court to pa 

hospital aad 8ecter 9 1118 

ri a special Rlghoay ?a- 

(., ; Bear Slr~: 

trdmaa iajurod in the 

c o tIreue s h is l mp 1 o ym. snt 

Wa mr0r t*, yaw Utter of 4*:1 loth, 1947, 

whleh~ %,a8 falfowas ‘~ ;. : ’ 

%ri lkrdlov lfortbm van erployeti by 

tiii QOalsslaners ’ 00nrR of this wwnty a8 

a JpmlrlLIl,gh~y Patc*Uun dariag~i ,porlod 

l $ etir 6e 

.muma*t %. 

L’. &nd rhl&# .,&II thd botitie ~br~‘hls 

. Hwthem reboclv~d deri’oud bod112 Ujar48a; rh&ah has required the erpdaditurl e $ s c o ~@ & & ë#8um ~e o f mo ney by wa y 

o f h o sp %tya lt l do c teb ) illa l, o w Hr . Retthu hag requU$t$d.th&lkurt tilhelp dofrar 

these ex)cInsou, wadi the Qa*rlsslouerel 

Is’ Wslra,u OX bal hit& him la the 

8 

ameun P ,“i” 

.th’,aetua$ bmb@itel ‘and d@62or bills, Ii 

thbrcl $9 WAy rrathetiiQ~ZW they d?lag 60. 

. 

.: : 

’ “Pl&3 rdyiae aa t* Whi9i ‘or not the 

Comiaaloaera~l Court of ~this 

authority. to pay suoh kills. * 

county has the 

We assuw.that the hospital and do&or bills 

‘~ meutloaeh in 

satioa which I 

&I* inquiry are in addition to the compens provided in Ur. I&rtham*s contract of 

employsmat. 

Comalssloners~ Courts have only such powers 

a8 are expressly or by necessary implication, g;;;;tby 

the Constitution and statutes of this State, 

art. V, sec. 18; Mills vs. hmpasas County, 40 9. WI 

4039 90 Tex. 606; Q. H. aud S. A. Rj. Co. ~8. Uvalde 

County, 167 5. W. 26. 305. 

_. 

, *. ‘c. 

.r, 

. ...:‘,! 
- - 

I 

Hon. Buu L. Butchlnson, Page 2, V-164 

After a careful study of your question, we 

have fotmd no authority, express or implied, vhlch authorizes the Convnlssloners 1 Court to expend county funds~ 

to pay hospital and doctor bills of a speclalhlghvay 

patrolman Injured while in the course of his employnmt. 

Therefore, your question Is answered In the negative. 

We are encloslug copies of our Oplalons Has. 

O-1967 and O-2951, which hold that a Commlssloners' Court 

has no authority to pay the hospital and doctor bills of 

a deputy sher~lff and of a constable who were injured vhlle 

in line of duty. 

The Comfnlssloners~ Court 0r Bowl0 County 

does not have authority to pay hospital and 

doctor bills o? a speolal highway patrolma 

who was injured while In the course of his emCon&. Art. III, Sects. 52 and 53; 

~?~~)50;. By. Co. v. Uvalde Oounty, 167 

. . . 

Yours very truly; 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

BY 

W. T. Wllllams 

Assistant 

WT&jeunrwb:dr:mrj 

.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                  0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                       0
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
As of December 31, 1996, neither the Company nor the Bank had commenced their 
respective operations as a bank holding company or as a commercial bank. 
Accordingly, the information required by Article 9 of Regulation S-X is not
applicable.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016172EN.01000201.xml

| 13.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 172/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 172/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 May 2016

(2016/C 172/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1389 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4407 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78888 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2945 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1063 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,91 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4193 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4998 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3569 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5541 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4594 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8378 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6724 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5620 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0732 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4242 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5030 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 131,14 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5704 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,015 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,7430 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,266 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9419 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3883 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,9290 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1389

JPY

Japanese yen

124,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4407

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78888

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2945

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1063

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,91

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4193

RON

Romanian leu

4,4998

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3569

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5541

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4594

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8378

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6724

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5620

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,57

ZAR

South African rand

17,0732

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4242

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5030

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 131,14

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5704

PHP

Philippine peso

53,015

RUB

Russian rouble

73,7430

THB

Thai baht

40,266

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9419

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3883

INR

Indian rupee

75,9290

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY to IP r 

REGION Ill 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 191 03-2029 

David K. Paylor, Director 

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality 

629 East Main Street 

Richmond, Virginia 23219 

Dear Mr. Paylor: 

MAY 1 5 Z014 

On March 25,2014, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to the 

Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Department of Environmental Quality pertaining to 

removal of the Stage II gasoline vapor recovery program from the attainment and maintenance plans for 

the Virginia jurisdictions located in the ozone transport region (OTR). EPA has determined that the 

submittal is administratively and technically complete, and is reviewing it to prepare a direct final 

rulemaking notice. 

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Asrah Khadr, at (215) 

814-2071, or at khadr.asrah@epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely, ~ 

1 / ' 

~/#l-t1 , r/ 

Diana Esher, Director 

Air Protection Division 

Q Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post-consumer fiber and process chlorine free. 

Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474
# C_2014260EN.01000602.xml

| 9.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7321 — CVC Capital Partners / Vedici Groupe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 260/05

On 5 August 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7321. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7321. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015257EN.01000401.xml

| 6.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/4

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.7630 — FedEx/TNT Express)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 257/02)

On 31 July 2015, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by e-mail to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference No M.7630 — FedEx/TNT Express, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
# C_2014342EN.01000101.xml

| 1.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 342/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 342/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7344 — Warburg Pincus/Banco Santander/Coffer)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 342/01

On 24 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7344. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7344. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40804

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

MIGUEL ANGEL GARCIA-SANCHEZ, also known as Miguel Arreola 

Sanchez, also known as Manuel Benites Arreola,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:14-CR-1000-1

Before REAVLEY, OWEN, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Miguel Angel 

Garcia-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia-Sanchez has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 29, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40804 Document: 00513776936 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
No. 15-40804

2

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-40804 Document: 00513776936 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
# C_2016248EN.01000102.xml

| 8.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7908 — CMA CGM/NOL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 248/02)

On 29 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7908. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7908. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016297EN.01000702.xml

| 17.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/7

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8141 — Watling Street/Sagemcom)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 297/06)

On 10 August 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8141. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8141. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---