alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2814 

To provide for affordable access to insulin and epinephrine. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. KENNEDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To provide for affordable access to insulin and epinephrine. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Vital Medication Af5 fordability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ACCESS TO AFFORDABLE LIFE-SAVING DRUGS. 

7 Section 330(k)(3) of the Public Health Service Act 

8 (42 U.S.C. 254b(k)(3)) is amended— 

9 (1) in subparagraph (M), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

10 and inserting a semicolon; 

11 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (N) as sub12 paragraph (O); and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2814 IS

1 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (M) the fol2 lowing: 

3 ‘‘(N) in the case of a center that partici4 pates in the drug discount program under sec5 tion 340B, the center has established, written 

6 practices to make insulin and injectable epi7 nephrine available at or below the discounted 

8 price paid by the center or subgrantee of the 

9 center under the drug discount program under 

10 section 340B (plus a minimal administration 

11 fee) to patients whose household income in 

12 equal to or less than 350 percent of the Federal 

13 poverty line and who— 

14 ‘‘(i) have a cost-sharing requirement 

15 under a health insurance plan for insulin 

16 or injectable epinephrine under which the 

17 patient out-of-pocket share is more than 

18 20 percent of the total amount charged by 

19 the center for such insulin or epinephrine; 

20 ‘‘(ii) have a high unmet deductible 

21 under a health insurance plan; or 

22 ‘‘(iii) have no health insurance; and’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Texland Drilling Program-1981, Ltd.

(A Limited Partnership)

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texland
Drilling Program-1981, LTD, (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the Report), we, Jerry N. Namy, Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, and M. E. Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Jerry N. Namy      
|    |  | Jerry N. Namy          
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | May 15, 2007           
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ M. E. Chapman      
|    |  | M. E. Chapman          
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | May 15, 2007
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov> To: <Neal.Brown@aps.com> Date: 7/22/2010 10:05 AM Subject: Re: Steam Electric Questionnaire Extension Request Attachments: pic10684.gif; APSICRExtensionRequest.pdf
Greetings, EPA has reviewed your extension requ est for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for the Four Corners Steam Electric Station. The deadline for your plant to submit Version 2 of the completed questionnaire is extended to October 15, 2010. If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560. Sincerely, (Embedded image moved to file: pic10684.gif)

From: Neal.Brown@aps.com To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Susan.VonStein@aps.com Date: 07/08/2010 10:56 AM Subject: Steam Electric Questionnaire Extension Request

Dear Ms. Alicea, Please see the attached request for an extension of time for the Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating Effluent Guidelines for the Four Corners Steam Electric Station, Plant ID# 03191. Thank you for your time in considering this request. Sincerely,

Neal Brown Environmental Consultant Arizona Public Service Company PO Box 53933, Mail Station 3871Phoenix, AZ 85072-3933 E-mail: Neal.Brown@APS.com Phone (602) 371-5922, Fax (602) 371-7286

Email Firewall made the following annotations

------------------------------------------------------------------------ NOTICE --- This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain confidential, privileged or proprietary information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original and any copy or printout. Unintended recipients are prohibited from making any other use of this e-mail. Although we have taken reasonable precautions to ensure no viruses are present in this e-mail, we accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments, or for any delay or errors or omissions in the contents which result from e-mail transmission.

--------------------------------------------------------------------- (See attached file: APSI CRExtensionRequest.pdf)
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600316

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

KYLE R. BICKHAM

Private (E-1), United States Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander Kevin B. Gerrity, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain Bree A. Ermentrout, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 30 November 2016

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, HUTCHISON, and GROHARING, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
# C_2016058EN.01000401.xml

| 13.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 February 2016

(2016/C 58/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1275 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4642 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77735 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4550 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0989 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6773 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,063 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,13 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4109 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4741 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3030 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5901 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5698 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7816 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6965 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5756 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 359,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,9194 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4114 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6320 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 211,54 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6955 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,561 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 89,5851 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,139 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5087 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,6852 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,9418 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1275

JPY

Japanese yen

127,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4642

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77735

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4550

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0989

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6773

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,063

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,13

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4109

RON

Romanian leu

4,4741

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3030

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5901

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5698

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7816

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6965

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5756

KRW

South Korean won

1 359,98

ZAR

South African rand

17,9194

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4114

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6320

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 211,54

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6955

PHP

Philippine peso

53,561

RUB

Russian rouble

89,5851

THB

Thai baht

40,139

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5087

MXN

Mexican peso

21,6852

INR

Indian rupee

76,9418

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[BDO SEIDMAN, LLP LETTERHEAD]

               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

To the Audit Committee of the
  Board of Directors of
  Southeastern Banking Corporation

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated financial statements of
Southeastern Banking Corporation and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2000, and for
the three-month period then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in
accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is
the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a
whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for them to be in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.


/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
May 10, 2000
Appeal Reinstated and Order filed November 4, 2021

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-21-00552-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF K.J., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 328th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 20-DCV-269944

ORDER

This is an appeal from a judgment terminating the parental rights of 

appellant, L.B. On October 26, 2021, we abated this appeal and ordered the trial 

court judge to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant desired to 

prosecute this appeal, and, if so, whether appellant is indigent and thus entitled to a 

free record and appointed counsel on appeal. This court also ordered the trial court 

judge to appoint an appellate counsel for appellant if necessary, to see that a record 

of the hearing was made, to make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and to 

forward records of the hearing including its findings and conclusions. On 

November 4, 2021, the trial court clerk forwarded the requested records, which 

among other things state that attorney Fred Krasny was appointed as appellate 

counsel for appellant.
2

Accordingly, this court lifts the abatement and reinstates the appeal. As the 

clerk’s record and reporter’s record have both been filed with this court, appellant

is directed to file her brief within 20 days of the date of this order.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Jewell, Bourliot, and Poissant.
Exhibit 24.2

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain and J. Christopher Kirk and each of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2002, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of
said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

| |  | /s/ ARLIN E. GAFFNERArlin E. Gaffner
| |  | ------------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



SOHU.COM INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify,
pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2004 and results of
operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2004.



/s/    Charles
ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board of DirectorsJune 24,
2004
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 21.01


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY


         FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC HAS ONE WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY, FATS,
INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION. AS OF MARCH 31, 2002, FATS,INC. HAS THE FOLLOWING
SIX WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES:

1.       FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, LIMITED;

2.       F.A.T.S. SINGAPORE PTE LTD;


3.       FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS NETHERLANDS B.V.;

4.       SIMTRAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.;

5.       FATS CANADA HOLDINGS; AND

6.       FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD.

DURING THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2002, F.A.T.S. FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION
WAS DISSOLVED IN JANUARY 2002 AND DART INTERNATIONAL, INC. WAS DISSOLVED IN MAY
2001. BOTH WERE PREVIOUSLY WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARIES.

         THE FOLLOWING ARE THE JURISDICTIONS OF INCORPORATION OF EACH OF THE
SUBSIDIARIES:

1.       FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, LTD. IS A COMPANY REGISTERED AND EXISTING
         UNDER THE LAWS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM.

2.       F.A.T.S. SINGAPORE PTE LTD. IS A COMPANY ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER
         THE LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE.


3.       FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS NETHERLANDS B.V. IS A CORPORATION ORGANIZED
         AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE NETHERLANDS.

4.       SIMTRAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. IS A CORPORATION ORGANIZED AND EXISTING
         UNDER THE LAWS OF CANADA.

5.       FATS CANADA HOLDINGS IS A CORPORATION ORGANIZED AND EXISTING UNDER THE
         LAWS OF CANADA.

6.       FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS AUSTRALIA PTY LTD. IS A COMPANY ORGANIZED
         AND EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF AUSTRALIA.

7.       F.A.T.S. FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION WAS A CORPORATION ORGANIZED AND
         EXISTING UNDER THE LAWS OF BARBADOS. THIS CORPORATION WAS VOLUNTARILY
         DISSOLVED IN JAN 2002 AS THE FSC REPEAL AND EXTRATERRITORIAL INCOME
         EXCLUSION ACT OF 2000 ("THE ACT") WAS SIGNED INTO LAW. THE ACT REPEALS
         THE FOREIGN SALES CORPORATION RULES AND ADOPTS A NEW REGIME UNDER
         WHICH U.S. TAXPAYERS CAN EXCLUDE FROM THEIR GROSS INCOME CERTAIN
         EXTRATERRITORIAL INCOME.

8.       DART INTERNATIONAL, INC. WAS A CORPORATION ORGANIZED AND EXISTING
         UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. THIS CORPORATION WAS
         DISSOLVED IN MAY 2001, AS THE COMPANY WAS TUCKED-IN UNDER FATS, INC.
         AS A PRODUCT LINE.
Opinion issued September 10, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 9
- 00 4 3 0
- CV

——————————— BRANDI HAGGERTON , Appellant

V. DANNY LE , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Bell County , Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 88872

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant, Brandi Haggerton, has failed to timely file a brief. Appellant’s brief was due by July 31, 201 9

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.6(a) (governing time to file appellant’s brief). On August 15 , 2019, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant
that this appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution , unless she filed a2

brief or a motion for an extension of time to file a brief by August 2 6 , 2019. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a) (governing failure of appellant to file brief) , 42.3(b) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case). To date, appellant has not filed a brief or
a motion for an extension of time

. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower , and Countiss
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Tac Asset Corp. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

November 10,2004
# C_2014397EN.01000102.xml

| 12.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 397/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 397/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7412 — SVP/LSHL)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 397/02

On 5 November 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7412. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7412. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
T. O., A Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1572

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Henry E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000937

25-NOV-2016

08:20 AM
Filed 11/27/12 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2012 ND 236

Randy Holkesvig, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Peter David Welte, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20120203

Randy Holkesvig, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Meredith Huseby Larson, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20120204

Randy Holkesvig, Plaintiff and Appellant

v.

Christopher Smith, Defendant and Appellee

No. 20120205

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven L. Marquart, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Randy Holkesvig, self-represented, P.O. Box 82, Fargo, ND 58107-0082, plaintiff and appellant; on brief.

Daniel L. Gaustad, P.O. Box 5758, Grand Forks, ND 58206-5758, for defendants and appellees; on brief.

Holkesvig v. Welte

No. 20120203

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Randy Holkesvig appealed from a district court judgment finding him in contempt of court for failing to obey a court order, and awarding Peter Welte, Meredith Larson, and Chris Smith $1,000 as a remedial sanction. On appeal, Holkesvig argues that he did not intentionally, willfully, and inexcusably disobey the district court’s order, argues that the district court abused its discretion, and raises numerous collateral issues. We summarily affirm the contempt issues under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4). We summarily affirm the collateral issues Holkesvig has raised under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1), and order Holkesvig to pay double costs and $1,000 in attorney fees for raising these issues in this appeal.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Mary Muehlen Maring

Carol Ronning Kapsner