alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY


       KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints George L. Lippe, Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain and William
P. Leiser the true and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of
substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to
sign on his behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of
Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the
Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999,
and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same,
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney or
attorney-in-fact, each of them with or without the others, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming
all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute
or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



                                        /s/ Henry J. Faison
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Henry J. Faison
-83 -82 -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76

 36

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲ ▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

05/25

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.03 N 77.49 W Meters AGL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      18,202,797
<SECURITIES>                                   866,435
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,917,760
<ALLOWANCES>                                   225,240
<INVENTORY>                                  2,788,839
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            26,826,665
<PP&E>                                       9,425,473
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,611,289
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              52,251,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,237,847
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       439,028
<OTHER-SE>                                  37,917,486
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                52,251,353
<SALES>                                      9,154,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,754,127
<CGS>                                        2,495,201
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,130,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (415,335)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             175,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,367,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                   944,728
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,422,832
<DISCONTINUED>                               4,988,941
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 6,411,773
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
        

</TABLE>
Opinion filed April 23, 2015

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-15-00077-CR

___________

ELMO RAY FORTENBERRY, JR., Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 385th District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR43001

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Elmo Ray Fortenberry, Jr., Appellant, filed an untimely pro se notice of appeal 

from a conviction for assault on a public servant. We dismiss the appeal. 

The documents on file in this case indicate that Appellant’s sentence was

imposed on August 13, 2014, and that his pro se notice of appeal was filed in the 

district clerk’s office on April 7, 2015. On April 6, 2015, this court received and 

filed Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his notice of appeal. The clerk 

of this court notified Appellant by letter dated April 7, 2015, that the notice of appeal 

appeared to be untimely and that the appeal may be dismissed. We requested that 

Appellant respond to our letter and show grounds to continue. Appellant has 

responded but has not shown grounds upon which this court can continue the appeal. 
2

Pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2, a notice of appeal is due to be filed either 

(1) within thirty days after the date that sentence is imposed in open court or (2) if 

the defendant timely files a motion for new trial, within ninety days after the date 

that sentence is imposed in open court. A notice of appeal must be in writing and 

filed with the clerk of the trial court. TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(c)(1). The documents on 

file in this court reflect that Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the clerk of 

the trial court 237 days after his sentence was imposed. The notice of appeal was, 

therefore, untimely. Absent a timely filed notice of appeal or the granting of a timely 

motion for extension of time, we do not have jurisdiction to entertain this appeal. 

Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d

519 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996); Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1993). Neither the notice of appeal nor the motion for extension were filed within

the fifteen-day period permitted by TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. This court, as an 

intermediate appellate court, has no jurisdiction to grant an out-of-time appeal or to 

grant an untimely motion for extension; the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals is the 

only court with jurisdiction in final postconviction felony proceedings. Olivo, 918 

S.W.2d at 522–24, 525 n.8; Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 

(Tex. Crim. App. 1991). Additionally, we note that the trial court’s certification of 

Appellant’s right of appeal indicates that Appellant has no right of appeal because 

this is a plea-bargain case and because Appellant waived his right of appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). 

This appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM

April 23, 2015

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
# C_2016039EN.01000201.xml

| 2.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 39/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 39/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

1 February 2016

(2016/C 39/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0884 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,99 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4625 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,76100 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2835 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1096 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4160 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,86 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3952 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5246 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2269 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5377 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5253 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4688 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6820 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5500 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 310,43 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5019 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1605 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6605 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 846,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5345 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,932 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 82,9655 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,760 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3511 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,8811 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,9100 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0884

JPY

Japanese yen

131,99

DKK

Danish krone

7,4625

GBP

Pound sterling

0,76100

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2835

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1096

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4160

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,86

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3952

RON

Romanian leu

4,5246

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2269

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5377

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5253

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4688

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6820

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5500

KRW

South Korean won

1 310,43

ZAR

South African rand

17,5019

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1605

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6605

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 846,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5345

PHP

Philippine peso

51,932

RUB

Russian rouble

82,9655

THB

Thai baht

38,760

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3511

MXN

Mexican peso

19,8811

INR

Indian rupee

73,9100

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016331EN.01000101.xml

| 9.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 331/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 331/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 September 2016

(2016/C 331/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1296 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,80 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4429 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84560 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4945 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0917 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1950 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3103 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4514 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3179 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4632 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4546 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7615 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5158 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5201 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 230,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7057 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5255 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4850 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 720,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5664 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,945 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,1488 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,220 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5982 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7145 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,9830 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1296

JPY

Japanese yen

114,80

DKK

Danish krone

7,4429

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84560

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4945

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0917

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1950

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3103

RON

Romanian leu

4,4514

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3179

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4632

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4546

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7615

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5158

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5201

KRW

South Korean won

1 230,87

ZAR

South African rand

15,7057

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5255

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4850

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 720,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5664

PHP

Philippine peso

52,945

RUB

Russian rouble

72,1488

THB

Thai baht

39,220

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5982

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7145

INR

Indian rupee

74,9830

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016221EN.01000102.xml

| 18.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8038 — Apax Partners/Accenture/Duck Creek)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 221/02)

On 3 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8038. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8038. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2623 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to modify requirements for a 

meat food product of cattle to bear a ‘‘Product of U.S.A.’’ label, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2021 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. BOOKER, Mr. DAINES, Mr. 

HAGERTY, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, Ms. LUMMIS, and Mr. THUNE) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Meat Inspection Act to modify requirements for a meat food product of cattle to bear 

a ‘‘Product of U.S.A.’’ label, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘U.S.A. Beef Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PRODUCT OF U.S.A. LABEL FOR BEEF. 

6 Section 7 of the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 

7 U.S.C. 607) is amended by adding at the end the fol8 lowing: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2623 IS

1 ‘‘(g) PRODUCT OF THE UNITED STATES LABEL FOR

2 BEEF.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subject to paragraph (2), 

4 the label of meat of cattle or a meat food product 

5 of cattle may bear the phrase ‘Product of U.S.A.’, 

6 or any substantially similar word or phrase, only if 

7 the meat or meat food product is exclusively derived 

8 from 1 or more cattle exclusively born, raised, and 

9 slaughtered in the United States. 

10 ‘‘(2) INAPPLICABILITY.—Paragraph (1) shall 

11 not apply to meat of cattle or a meat food product 

12 of cattle that is intended and offered for export to 

13 a foreign country.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
E.O. 12866 Meeting on the Greenhouse Gas New Source

Performance Standard for Electric Generating Units Rule

Tue 02/07/2012 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM

Attendance is for RobertJ Wayland

Chair: Mabel_E._Echols@omb.eop.gov

Location: 202-395-6392; code 3862485

This entry has an alarm. The alarm will go off before the entry starts.

Required:

Cass_R._Sunstein@omb.eop.gov, Kevin_F._Neyland@omb.eop.gov, Jeffrey_G_Weiss@omb.eop.gov, 

Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov, Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov, Manisha_D_Patel@ceq.eop.gov, 

Michael_C._Clark@omb.eop.gov, John_S._MacNeil@omb.eop.gov, Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US, Peter 

Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US

This meeting was requested by David Doniger, NRDC.

Call-in number: 202-395-6392; code 3862485.
# C_2016047EN.01000301.xml

| 6.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 February 2016

(2016/C 47/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1202 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,71 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4629 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,76975 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4325 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1101 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5665 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,037 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4134 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5028 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2498 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5583 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5404 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7231 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6655 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5636 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 333,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7584 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3624 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6540 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 177,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6528 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,271 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,0050 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,778 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3454 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3988 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,7857 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1202

JPY

Japanese yen

130,71

DKK

Danish krone

7,4629

GBP

Pound sterling

0,76975

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4325

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1101

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5665

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,037

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4134

RON

Romanian leu

4,5028

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2498

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5583

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5404

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7231

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6655

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5636

KRW

South Korean won

1 333,89

ZAR

South African rand

17,7584

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3624

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6540

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 177,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6528

PHP

Philippine peso

53,271

RUB

Russian rouble

86,0050

THB

Thai baht

39,778

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3454

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3988

INR

Indian rupee

75,7857

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: 

STATE OF TEXAS, 

RELATOR.

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00156-CR

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF

MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus 

against the Honorable Luis Aguilar, Judge of the 243rd District Court of El Paso County, Texas, 

and concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be conditionally granted. We 

therefore direct the trial court to withdraw the order disqualifying Assistant District Attorney 

Denise Butterworth from the prosecution of the case against Luis Solis Gonzalez, in accordance 

with the opinion of this Court. The writ of mandamus will issue should the trial court fail to 

comply.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Accessory Specialists Incorporated (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

July__,2004
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-14317

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 2:15-cr-00066-LSC-HGD-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARCOS ANTONIO BACA-CAMPAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Alabama

________________________

(November 29, 2016)

Before MARCUS, JILL PRYOR and FAY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Alison Wallace, appointed counsel for Marcos Baca-Campas in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

Case: 15-14317 Date Filed: 11/29/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Baca-Campas’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 15-14317 Date Filed: 11/29/2016 Page: 2 of 2
# C_2016026EN.01000301.xml

| 23.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 26/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Belgium

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Olympic Games

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The inner part of the coin depicts, from top to bottom, a stylised figure, the five Olympic rings and the inscription ‘TEAM BELGIUM’. The year 2016 is written on the left-hand side of the coin. The country code ‘BE’ appears on the right-hand side of the coin, between the mark of the Brussels mint, a helmeted profile of the archangel Michael, and the signature mark of the Master of the Mint.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 375 000 coins

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : March 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---