alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 269 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently extend the 

work opportunity credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2021 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BROWN, Mr. CASSIDY, and Mr. MENENDEZ) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permanently 

extend the work opportunity credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Work Opportunity Tax 

5 Credit and Jobs Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WORK OPPORTUNITY CREDIT MADE PERMANENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 51(c) of the Internal Rev8 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking paragraphs (4) 

9 and (5). 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 269 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to individuals who begin work for 

3 the employer after December 31, 2020. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 24.4**

** **

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E.Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher Kirk and eachof them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitutionand resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and to sign anyor all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each andevery act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do inperson, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-factor their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof.

 

 
|   |  /s/ REBECCA A. MCDONALD |   |
|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   | Rebecca A. McDonald           |   |

 

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors
Trendwest Resorts, Inc.:


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-82065) on Form S-8 of Trendwest Resorts, Inc. of our report dated February
6, 2001 except as to note 18, which is as of February 21, 2001, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Trendwest Resorts, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the related consolidated statements of income,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2000, which report appears in
the December 31, 2000, annual report on Form 10-K of Trendwest Resorts, Inc.


/s/ KPMG LLP

Seattle, Washington
March 28, 2001
Order entered November 29, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01055-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.S., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-00707-W

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal which we abated to allow the trial court to conduct a 

hearing to determine whether Father desires to prosecute this appeal and is entitled to appointed 

counsel. The reporter’s record of the hearing has been filed, but the clerk’s record, ordered to be 

filed no later than November 6, 2016, containing the trial court’s findings from the hearing has 

not. Accordingly, we ORDER Dallas County District Clerk Felicia Pitre to file, no later than 

December 1, 2016, a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to (1) the Honorable 

Andrea Martin, Presiding Judge of the 304th Judicial District Court; (2) Ms. Pitre; and (3) the 

parties.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
**Exhibit 24.5**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E.Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher Kirk and eachof them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitutionand resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, and to sign anyor all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each andevery act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do inperson, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-factor their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof.

 

 
|   | /s/ J.  MCDONALD WILLIAMS |   |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|
|   | J.  McDonald Williams     |   |

 

----
Exhibit 10.39


 


	
    Below is the Spousal Consent, dated December 2017, issued
    by Xiangyang Chai, the spouse of Xiaoli Lou. Certain identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both immaterial
    and is the type that the registrant treats as private and confidential.



 


Spousal Consent


 


I, Xiangyang Chai (柴向阳),
a People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) citizen with PRC ID Card No.:[XXXXXXXXXXX], am the lawful spouse of
Xiaoli Lou ( 娄 晓 丽 ), a PRC citizen with PRC ID
Card No.:[XXXXXXXXXXX]. I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents by Xiaoli Lou ( 娄晓丽)
on December 2017, and the disposal of the equity interests of Jihuiduo (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. (积惠多(北京)科技有限公司),“VIE
Company”) held by Xiaoli Lou and registered in her name according to the following documents (collectively,
“Transaction Documents”):


 


	(a)	the Call Option Agreement entered into among Zhifu Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (志福商贸(上海)有限公司,
“WFOE”), Xiaoli Lou (娄晓丽), Shufen
Xiao (肖淑芬) and VIE Company;



 


	(b)	the Loan Agreement entered into among the WFOE, Xiaoli Lou ( 娄
晓 丽 ), Shufen Xiao (肖淑芬) and
VIE Company;



 


	(c)	the Equity Pledge Agreement entered into between the WFOE and Xiaoli Lou(娄晓丽)
; and



 


	(d)	the Power of Attorney executed by Xiaoli Lou (娄晓丽).



 


I shall not make any assertions in connection
with the equity interests of VIE Company held by Xiaoli Lou (娄晓丽).
I confirm that Xiaoli Lou (娄晓丽) may perform the
Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents without my authorisation or consent.


 


I shall execute all documents and take
all actions necessary or desirable to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction Documents (as amended from time to time) upon
the WFOE’s request.


 


If I obtain any equity interests of VIE Company
that are currently held by Xiaoli Lou ( 娄 晓 丽 )
for any reason, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents as well as the Exclusive Services Agreement entered into between the WFOE
and VIE Company dated ____ December 2017 (as amended from time to time), and the Intellectual Property Licence Agreement entered
into between the WFOE and VIE Company dated ____ December 2017 (as amended from time to time), and shall comply with the obligations
thereunder. For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall sign one or more written documents of substantially the same form
and content as the Transaction Documents, as well as the Exclusive Services Agreement and the Intellectual Property Licence Agreement
(as amended from time to time).


 






    


     


    

 








	 	Name:	Xiangyang
    Chai (柴向阳)
	 	Signature: 	/s/
    Xiangyang Chai
	 	Date:	 


 


Signature Page
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 225 SSM 29

Justin Nazario,

 Respondent,

 v.

222 Broadway, LLC, et al.,

 Respondents.

---------------------------------

222 Broadway, LLC, et al.,

 Third-Party Respondents,

 v.

Knight Electrical Services Corp.,

 Third-Party Appellant.

(And Other Third-Party Actions.)

Submitted by Amy L. Fenno, for third-party appellant.

Submitted by D. Carl Lustig, III, for respondent Justin

Nazario.

Submitted by Leslie McHugh, for respondents 222 Broadway,

LLC et al. 

Submitted by Thomas F. Cerussi, for third-party respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as

appealed from, should be modified, without costs, by denying

plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of

liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim and remitting the case

- 1 -
- 2 - SSM No. 29

to the Appellate Division for consideration of the issues raised

but not determined on the appeal to that court, and, as so

modified, affirmed, and the certified question should be answered

in the negative.

Plaintiff is not entitled to summary judgment under

Labor Law § 240 (1). While using an A-frame ladder, plaintiff

fell after receiving an electrical shock. Questions of fact

exist as to whether the ladder failed to provide proper

protection, and whether plaintiff should have been provided with

additional safety devices (see Blake v Neighborhood Hous. Servs.

of N.Y. City, 1 NY3d 280, 287 [2003]; Barreto v Metropolitan

Transp. Auth., 25 NY3d 426 [2015], rearg denied 25 NY3d 1211

[2015]). Defendants Lime Energy Co. and Jones Lang LaSalle

Americas, Inc. were properly granted summary judgment on their

contractual indemnification claims against Knight Electrical

Services Corp.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,

order, insofar as appealed from, modified, without costs, by

denying plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on the

issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240(1) claim and remitting

the case to the Appellate Division, First Department, for

consideration of issues raised but not determined on the appeal

to that court, and, as so modified, affirmed, and certified

question answered in the negative, in a memorandum. Chief Judge

DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and

Garcia concur.

Decided November 21, 2016

- 2 -
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL P R OTE CTION AGEN CY REGION 8



# ·. s;sra:
•\\'"'<

Ref: 8P-AR Mr. Brian Gustafson, Administrator Air Quality Program 1595 VVynkoop Street DENVER, CO 80202-1129 Phone 800-227-8917 http :/lwww.epa.gov /region08


## OEC 3 i 

## 7013

Department of Environment and Natural Resources PMB 2020 Joe Foss 13uilding 523 East Capito l Pierre, South Dakota 57501-3182 Dear Mr. Gustafson: Thank you for submitting the 2013 South Dakota Annual M on itoring Network Plan (AMNP) dated 2013 and received under a cover letter dated August 9, 2013. Region 8 has reviewed the submitted AMNP and found that the requirem ents s pecified in 40 CFR Part 58.1 0, as well as the I05 gran t commitment to conduct a review annually, have been met with the submission ofthis document. Included with your submittal were 3 network modification requests referenced in the cover letter dated August 9, 2013, and outli ned in the 2013 South Dakota AMNP. South Dakota's proposed modifications t o the monitoring network: I) discontinuing carbon monoxide monitoring at sampling at the UC #I Site in Union County 2) discontinuing particulate matter (PM 10 ) sampling at the RC National Guard Site in Rapid City and 3) terminating site operations at UC #2 Site in Union County, would all take place at the end of2013. Region 8 concurs with the proposed network modifications for the following reasons provided in the AMNP sub mittal: I) four years of carbon monoxide sampling at the UC# I Site ha s consistently demonstrated average carbon monoxide concentration levels to be no mor e than 3% of the 8-hour standard and 2% of the 1-hou r standard. 2) PM 10 sampling conducted since 1992 at the RC National Guard Site in Rapid City to evaluate the impac t on air qua lity f rom quarries has never recorded a concentration in excess of the 24-hour standard and annua l averages s how a steady decline in P M 10 concentration level s. 3) The site operations at the UC #2 Site in Union County are unnecessary because site operations at the UC #I Site in Union County are adequate given the Hyperion Project is currently not being built and the company has no permit to construct If you have any questions on these issues, please contact me at (303) 3 12-6416 or Albion Carlson, of my staff, at (303) 312-6207.

cc: Brad Schultz, SDDENR 

# c:J

Carl Daly, Director Air Program
# C_2016309EN.01000101.xml

| 25.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8112 — Japan Tunnel Systems Corporation/Mitsubishi Heavy Industries/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 309/01)

On 17 August 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8112. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8112. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 58 (Thursday, March 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16010-16011]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06925]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications

[[Page 16011]]

must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the 
Board of Governors not later than April 23, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Royal Bank of Canada, Montreal, Canada and its wholly-owned 
subsidiary, RBC USA Holdco, New York, New York; to acquire City 
National Corporation and thereby indirectly acquire City National Bank, 
both in Los Angeles, California. In connection with this application, 
RBC USA Holdco Corporation, New York, New York, has applied to become a 
bank holding company.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 23, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-06925 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
April 3, 2013 REVISED 

# Security Aviation Tatitlek EAS Proposal

Proposal to Provide EAS at Tatitlek, Docket DOT-OST-2013-0030 Mr. Kevin Adams Contracting Officer Kevin.adams@dot.gov Phone 202-366-1047

Submitted By: Fly 4 You, Inc dba SecurityAviation 6121 South Airpark Place Anchorage, Alaska 99502 RE: EAS between Anchorage and Tatitlek, AK SolicitationNumber: Docket DOT-OST-2013-0030 Offer Receipt Deadline: Thursday March 21, 2013 DearMr. Adams: Please accept this proposal for the above-referenced solicitation for providing Essential Air ServicebetweenAnchorage and Tatitlek, Alaska. SecurityAviation is anAlaskan owned and Anchorage based small business operating out ofa private facility onthe Ted Stevens International Airport. We offer free parking, a comfortable lobby and refer/freezer space is available at no charge. We have been conducting safe and efficient operations inAlaskafor 27 years which affords us the ability to carry $30 million of liability coverage withno seat limits. Our aircraft and pilots have a provenhistory of successful operations throughout Alaska. This proposal is based onthe utilization ofa twin-engine PiperNavajo. Security Aviation operates two (2) Navajos. Route: Anchorage- Tatitlek- Anchorage Proposed travel day: Thursday Departure time: 10:00 AM* Frequency offlights: 1 (one) dedicated flight per week* *Departure and arrival times may vary based on season, passenger load and routing. *Tatitlek stop may be incorporated in other routing. • ! ;"**;..~** {:J**~"** • .. ..

The PiperNavajo offers a max payload of: 1,700 lbs Anchorage to Tatitlek And 1,850 lbs Tatitlekto Anchorage Passenger: up to 8 (eight) Flight time is 45 min each way Estimated cost: $2,144.00 per trip (Additional charters available as needed at the same cost) Seat Fares: $170.00 each way (50 lbs ofcargo allowable perperson at no charge) Additional .50 cents per pound in excess of50 lbs Personal/Cargo only: $20.00 handling fee+ (plus) .50 cents perpound (limited to space available) Mail pick-up and drop-offat Tatitlek airport to be arranged /paid for by DoTNillage of Tatitlek Mail pick-up and drop-offat Anchorage, Postmark Drive location to be handled by Security Aviation. Proposal, seat fares and cargo are based on flight time and cost offuel. All pricing includes landing fees and Federal Excise Tax. This proposal is valid for this solicitation only and may be changed ifsolicitation is amended or ifthe award is delayed beyond a reasonable period oftime. Contract Performance Security Aviationhas beenthe primary contractor for transportation ofpersonnel services to the DOD inAlaska for the last 15 years. Overthattime we have established and maintained a cohesive working relationship withthe DOD, DOT, DOl, State ofAlaska, FAA and a number ofother safety-sensitive companies. We look forward to the opportunity to expand upon and continue this long-term, mutually beneficial relationship.

Person authorized to negotiate contract:

Person authorized to signproposal: Mr. Jason Ward Sr. Vice President Sales and Marketing Security Aviation Tel. No.: (907) 248-2677 FaxNo.: (907 248-6911 Mr. Jason Ward Same as above
Exhibit 32.1



                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of ASPI, Inc. for
the year  ended  June 30,  2012,  I, Yuen Ling Look,  Chief  Executive  Officer,
President  and Chief  Financial  Officer  (Principal  Executive  and  Accounting
Officer) of ASPI, Inc.,  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as
adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  to my
knowledge, that:

     a)   such Annual Report on Form 10-K of ASPI,  Inc. for the year ended June
          30, 2010,  fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     b)   the information  contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K of ASPI,
          Inc.  for the  year  ended  June 30,  2010,  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of ASPI, Inc.


Date:  October 15, 2012



                                  /s/ Yuen Ling Look
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  Yuen Ling Look, Chief Executive Officer,
                                  President and Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)



This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-10918

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID RAMOS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-98-17

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent David Ramos has moved for leave to

withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Ramos has filed a response. Our independent review of the record,

counsel’s brief, and Ramos’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Ramos’s untimely request for appointment of new counsel

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 17, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-10918 Document: 00511205633 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/17/2010
No. 09-10918

on appeal is DENIED. See United States v. Wagner, 158 F.3d 901, 902-03 (5th

Cir. 1998).

2

Case: 09-10918 Document: 00511205633 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/17/2010