alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                      24,081,743
<SECURITIES>                                 5,643,535
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,669,626
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            38,539,180
<PP&E>                                       5,465,394
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,762,476
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,953,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        7,810,448
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       964,909
<OTHER-SE>                                  39,391,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,953,111
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,948,076
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               16,243,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,020,679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             300,526
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              4,719,304
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,401,244
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,318,060
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,587,687
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Accessory Specialists Incorporated (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

May 13,2004
# C_2015250EN.01000601.xml

| 31.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7674 — Talanx/NORD/LB/Caplantic)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 250/02)

On 24 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7674. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7674. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016288EN.01000101.xml

| 9.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 August 2016

(2016/C 288/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1087 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,59 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4368 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84955 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5250 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0883 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4065 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,027 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,02 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2786 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4584 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3082 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4520 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4573 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5999 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5548 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4944 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 229,38 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1284 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3848 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4799 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 552,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4694 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,004 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,8090 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,793 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5239 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6443 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,1000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1087

JPY

Japanese yen

113,59

DKK

Danish krone

7,4368

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84955

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5250

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0883

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4065

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,027

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,02

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2786

RON

Romanian leu

4,4584

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3082

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4520

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4573

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5999

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5548

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4944

KRW

South Korean won

1 229,38

ZAR

South African rand

15,1284

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3848

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4799

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 552,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4694

PHP

Philippine peso

52,004

RUB

Russian rouble

71,8090

THB

Thai baht

38,793

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5239

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6443

INR

Indian rupee

74,1000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016223EN.01000901.xml

| 21.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 June 2016

(2016/C 223/10)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1332 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 118,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4359 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77375 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3338 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0884 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3575 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,063 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,92 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3925 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5393 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2821 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5188 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4520 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7936 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5936 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5225 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 312,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7941 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4562 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5180 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 024,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5942 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,434 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,4231 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,877 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8286 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0894 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,3280 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1332

JPY

Japanese yen

118,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4359

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77375

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3338

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0884

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3575

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,063

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,92

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3925

RON

Romanian leu

4,5393

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2821

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5188

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4520

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7936

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5936

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5225

KRW

South Korean won

1 312,29

ZAR

South African rand

16,7941

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4562

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5180

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 024,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5942

PHP

Philippine peso

52,434

RUB

Russian rouble

72,4231

THB

Thai baht

39,877

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8286

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0894

INR

Indian rupee

76,3280

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), As Adopted

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Southeastern Banking Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Cornelius P. Holland, III, President &
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CORNELIUS P. HOLLAND, IIICornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO/s/ ALYSON G. BEASLEYAlyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer


Date: May 15, 2008
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A04-1604-CR-918 | November 30, 2016 Page 1 of 3

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), 

this Memorandum Decision shall not be 

regarded as precedent or cited before any 

court except for the purpose of establishing 

the defense of res judicata, collateral 

estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT

Peter D. Todd

Elkhart, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE

Gregory F. Zoeller

Attorney General of Indiana

Matthew B. Mackenzie

Deputy Attorney General

Indianapolis, Indiana

I N T H E

COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

Sammie L. Binion,

Appellant-Defendant,

v.

State of Indiana,

Appellee-Plaintiff.

November 30, 2016

Court of Appeals Case No.

20A04-1604-CR-918

Appeal from the Elkhart Superior 

Court

The Honorable Gretchen S. Lund, 

Judge

Trial Court Cause No.

20D04-1406-FD-682

Najam, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A04-1604-CR-918 | November 30, 2016 Page 2 of 3

Statement of the Case

[1] Sammie Binion appeals his sentence following his conviction for theft, as a 

Class D felony. Binion presents a single issue for our review, namely, whether 

the trial court erred when it imposed a fee for collecting a DNA sample from 

him. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural History 

[2] On March 2, 2016, Binion pleaded guilty to theft, as a Class D felony. On 

March 30, the trial court sentenced Binion to 545 days executed in the Indiana 

Department of Correction. In its sentencing statement, the trial court ordered 

Binion “to submit to a DNA sample at his own expense.” Tr. at 23. This 

appeal ensued.

Discussion and Decision 

[3] Binion acknowledges that, under Indiana Code Section 10-13-6-10 (2016), he is 

required to provide a DNA sample. Binion also acknowledges that, under 

Indiana Code Section 33-37-5-26.2, he was required to pay a $2 fee for the 

collection of that DNA sample. But Binion contends that the trial court 

imposed an additional fee for the collection of the DNA sample for “an 

indeterminate amount of money[.]” Appellant’s Br. at 5. And Binion 

maintains that “[n]othing in the code authorizes the court to impose” that

alleged additional fee. Id.

[4] Binion does not direct us to anything in the record showing that he was 

required to pay more than $2 for the DNA sample collection. The only 
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 20A04-1604-CR-918 | November 30, 2016 Page 3 of 3

reference to a DNA collection fee in the record is the trial court’s statement at 

sentencing that Binion was “to submit to a DNA sample at his own expense.” 

Tr. at 23. As the State points out, there is no evidence to suggest that, with that 

statement, the trial court meant anything other than the statutory $2 collection 

fee. Accordingly, Binion has not shown any error.

[5] Affirmed.

Bailey, J, and May, J., concur.
Exhibit 99.2

News Release
January 13, 2000

Trading Symbols:TRBD (EASDAQ)

TURBODYNE SETTLES WITH LLOYDS OF LONDON

Carpinteria, CAJanuary 13, 2000Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s (EASDAQ:TRBD) CEO
Gerhard Delf announced today that Turbodyne has settled its lawsuit against Lloyds of London.

Turbodyne
filed suit against Lloyds on May 3, 1999 in Los Angeles Superior Court. This 1999 litigation involved Lloyds' denial of coverage under Turbodyne's directors' and
officers' insurance in the Grand Tech Inc. litigation against Turbodyne and Ed Halimi, a director and former officer. Turbodyne's complaint was for, among other things, breach of contract.

The
terms of settlement provided for a lump sum payment of $1.5 million to Turbodyne. Turbodyne has received payment of the settlement amount.

Turbodyne
Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company, specializes in the development, manufacture and marketing of performance enhancement, fuel economy and
pollution control products for internal combustion engines in the global automotive, transportation, construction, marine, mining and military industries.

Turbodyne
Technologies Inc.'s headquarters and plant are located in Carpinteria, CA; additional offices are located in Syosset, NY; Paris, France; and Frankfurt, Germany.

Contacts:

Corporate
Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group FinanceInvestor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Business Development, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665

---

QuickLinks
# C_2015270EN.01000101.xml

| 17.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 270/01)

Last publication

OJ C 262, 10.8.2015

Past publications

OJ C 254, 3.8.2015

OJ C 245, 27.7.2015

OJ C 236, 20.7.2015

OJ C 228, 13.7.2015

OJ C 221, 6.7.2015

OJ C 213, 29.6.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
---

---

EXHIBIT 10.1

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-116429), pertaining to On Track Innovations Ltd.s 2001 Share Option Plan,
2001 Employee Share Purchase Plan and 1995 Share Option Plan, Forms F-3 (File Nos.
333-111770, 333-115953 and 333-121316) and related Prospectus of On Track Innovations Ltd.
and its subsidiaries contained in each of the aforementioned registration statements of
our report dated March 28, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
On Track Innovations Ltd. and its subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2002
included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004.

|May 1, 2005      | Luboshitz Kasierer                                
|---------------- | --------------------------------------------------
|                 |                                                   
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | An affiliate member of Ernst & Young International

80

---

---
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David L. Osborn, the President of
Hudson's Grill International, Inc., certify that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | (Registrant)

HUDSON'S GRILL INTERNATIONAL,
INC.

By: s/s David L. Osborn

David L. Osborn, President

Date: August 29, 2008
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

f\sec\o01.080630
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

         The following are the Subsidiaries of the Borrower. Each of the
Subsidiaries is a 100-percent owned, direct subsidiary of the Borrower:

1.  Firearms Training Systems, LTD;

2.  F.A.T.S. Singapore PTE LTD;

3.  F.A.T.S. Foreign Sales Corporation;

4.  Firearms Training Systems Netherlands B.V.;

5.  Simtran Technologies; and

6.  Dart International, Inc.

         The following are the jurisdictions of incorporation of each of the
Subsidiaries:

1.  Firearms Training Systems, LTD. is a company registered and existing under
    the laws of the United Kingdom.

2.  F.A.T.S. Singapore PTE LTD. is a company organized and existing under the
    laws of the Republic of Singapore.

3.  F.A.T.S. Foreign Sales Corporation is a corporation organized and existing
    under the laws of Barbados.

4.  Firearms Training Systems Netherlands B.V. is a corporation organized and
    existing under the laws of The Netherlands.

5.  Simtran Technologies is a corporation organized and existing under the laws
    of Canada.

6.  Dart International, Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the
    laws of the state of Colorado.
Exhibit 32.1

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition of the Company as of September 30, 2006 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2006.



/s/ Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of DirectorsNovember 6, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 22
- 0156 CITY OF GREAT FALLS,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. HANNAH ROSE KUNTZ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 6, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 28 2022

07/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0156
Dismissed and Opinion Filed May 3, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-21-00740-CV

NATALIE THARP, Appellant

V.

CAMERON RENEAU, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-02362-E

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Molberg, Reichek, and Garcia

Opinion by Justice Molberg

Before the Court is appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal for want 

of prosecution. By order dated February 23, 2022, we granted appellant’s second 

motion for an extension of time to file her brief, extended the deadline to March 21, 

and cautioned her that further extension requests would be disfavored. To date, 

appellant has not filed a brief, a response to appellee’s motion, or otherwise 

communicated with the Court. In light of these circumstances, we grant appellee’s 

motion and dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.

38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b).

210740f.p05

/Ken Molberg//

KEN MOLBERG

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

NATALIE THARP, Appellant

No. 05-21-00740-CV V.

CAMERON RENEAU, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-02362-

E.

Opinion delivered by Justice 

Molberg. Justices Reichek and 

Garcia participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is 

DISMISSED.

Judgment entered this 3

rd day of May, 2022.