16720 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices 

1 $64/hour figure for a Compliance Clerk is from 

SIFMA’s Office Salaries in the Securities Industry 

2013 survey, modified by Commission staff to 

account for an 1800-hour work year and multiplied 

by 2.93 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee 

benefits and overhead. 

approximately 50 registrants governed 

by Rule 6c–7. The burden of compliance 

with Rule 6c–7, in connection with the 

registrants obtaining from a purchaser, 

prior to or at the time of purchase, a 

signed document acknowledging the 

restrictions on redeem ability imposed 

by Texas law, is estimated to be 

approximately 3 minutes per response 

for each of approximately 2,300 

purchasers annually (at an estimated 

$64 per hour),1 for a total annual burden 

of 115 hours (at a total annual cost of 

$7,360). 

Rule 6c–7 requires that the separate 

account’s registration statement under 

the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a 

et seq.) include a representation that 

Rule 6c–7 is being relied upon and is 

being complied with. This requirement 

enhances the Commission’s ability to 

monitor utilization of and compliance 

with the rule. There are no 

recordkeeping requirements with 

respect to Rule 6c–7. 

The estimate of average burden hours 

is made solely for the purposes of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not 

derived from a comprehensive or even 

a representative survey or study of the 

costs of Commission rules or forms. The 

Commission does not include in the 

estimate of average burden hours the 

time preparing registration statements 

and sales literature disclosure regarding 

the restrictions on redeem ability 

imposed by Texas law. The estimate of 

burden hours for completing the 

relevant registration statements are 

reported on the separate PRA 

submissions for those statements. (See 

the separate PRA submissions for Form 

N–3 (17 CFR 274.11b) and Form N–4 (17 

CFR 274.11c).) 

Complying with the collection of 

information requirements of the rules is 

necessary to obtain a benefit. An agency 

may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, a 

collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. 

The public may view the background 

documentation for this information 

collection at the following Web site, 

www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be 

directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs, Office of Management and 

Budget, Room 10102, New Executive 

Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, 

or by sending an email to: Shagufta_

Ahmed@omb.eop.gov; and (ii) Pamela 

Dyson, Director/Chief Information 

Officer, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, c/o Remi Pavlik-Simon, 

100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 

or send an email to: PRA_Mailbox@

sec.gov. Comments must be submitted to 

OMB within 30 days of this notice. 

Dated: March 24, 2015. 

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07130 Filed 3–27–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

[Docket No. NHTSA–2013–0058] 

Model Specifications for Breath 

Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices 

(BAIIDs) 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), 

Department of Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Technical corrections; proposed 

changes and request for comments. 

SUMMARY: NHTSA published a notice in 

the Federal Register on May 8, 2013, (78 

FR 26849; NHTSA Docket 2013–0058) 

that revised the Model Specifications for 

Breath Alcohol Ignition Interlock 

Devices (BAIIDs). The text of the notice 

contained some typographical and 

technical errors. This document 

describes and corrects those errors. This 

notice also proposes some additional 

changes to the BAIID Model 

Specifications and requests comments 

on the proposed changes. 

DATES: The technical corrections 

contained in this notice are effective on 

March 30, 2015. Regarding the proposed 

changes contained in this notice, 

written comments may be submitted to 

this agency and must be received no 

later than April 29, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by DOT Docket ID Number 

NHTSA–2013–0058 by any of the 

following methods: 

• Electronic submissions: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

online instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• Fax: 202–493–2251. 

• Mail: Docket Management Facility, 

M–30, U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building, Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery or Courier: West 

Building, Ground Floor, Room W12– 

140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

Regardless of how you submit your 

comments, you should identify the 

Docket number of this document. 

Instructions: For detailed instructions 

on submitting comments and additional 

information, see http://

www.regulations.gov. Note that all 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided. Please 

see the ‘‘Privacy Act’’ heading below. 

Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search 

the electronic form of all comments 

received into any of our dockets by the 

name of the individual submitting the 

comment (or signing the comment, if 

submitted on behalf of an association, 

business, labor union, etc.). You may 

review the complete User Notice and 

Privacy Notice for Reglations.gov at 

http://www.regulations.gov/search/

footer/privacyanduse.jsp. 

Docket: For access to the docket to 

read background documents or 

comments received, go to http://

www.regulations.gov at any time or visit 

the West Building, Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

For technical issues: Ms. De Carlo 

Ciccel, Behavioral Research Division, 

NTI–131, National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration, 1200 New 

Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 

20590; Telephone number: (202) 366– 

1694; Email: decarlo.ciccel@dot.gov. 

For legal issues: Ms. Jin Kim, AttorneyAdvisor, Office of the Chief Counsel, 

NCC–113, National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration, 1200 New 

Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 

20590; Telephone number: (202) 366– 

1834; Email: jin.kim@dot.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NHTSA 

published a notice in the Federal 

Register on May 8, 2013, (78 FR 26849; 

NHTSA Docket 2013–0058) that revised 

the Model Specifications for Breath 

Alcohol Ignition Interlock Devices 

(BAIIDs). 

The notice that was published on May 

8, 2013, went into effect one year later, 

on May 8, 2014. As explained in the 

2013 notice, NHTSA considered 

whether it should evaluate ignition 

interlocks against the Model 

Specifications and publish a conforming 

products list (CPL) of devices that meet 

the specifications. For reasons described 

in some detail in the 2013 notice, 

NHTSA explained that it would delay 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices 16721 

rendering a decision about the 

feasibility and timing of a CPL until 

more information is available. NHTSA 

stated, in the notice, that it planned to 

conduct an assessment to determine 

whether establishing and maintaining a 

CPL is feasible, prior to making a 

decision. 

Following publication of the 2013 

notice, NHTSA initiated such an 

assessment. During the course of the 

assessment, NHTSA identified some 

aspects of the Model Specifications that 

may warrant clarification and/or 

modification. In addition, the agency 

received written communications from a 

number of organizations, including 

interlock providers, a testing laboratory, 

the Association of Ignition Interlock 

Program Administrators (AIIPA) and 

others, which brought some 

typographical and technical errors to the 

agency’s attention and/or sought 

clarification regarding some elements of 

the Model Specifications. These written 

communications and our responses 

have been placed in our public docket 

(NHTSA–2013–0058). 

This notice describes and corrects the 

technical errors. These technical 

corrections will take effect immediately. 

This notice also proposes some 

revisions to the Model Specifications 

and requests comments on the proposed 

changes. 

A. Technical Corrections (Which Will 

Take Effect Immediately) 

The following changes are considered 

by the agency to be technical 

corrections. They will take effect 

immediately upon publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register. 

Test 9. Tampering and Circumvention— 

e. Cooled 0.032 BrAC Sample 

In the Federal Register notice 

published on May 8, 2013, Test 9e in 

the Model Specifications indicated that 

a .032 sample should be ‘‘cooled to ice 

temperature’’. 

This notice inserts the word ‘‘water’’ 

and the parenthetical ‘‘(0°C/32°F)’’ to 

clarify that the sample should be 

‘‘cooled to ice water temperature,’’ 

which is 0°C (32°F). 

Test 11. Altitude 

In the Federal Register notice 

published on May 8, 2013, Test 11 in 

the Model Specifications was entitled 

‘‘High Altitude’’ (78 FR 26865). 

However, it covers tests for both high 

altitude (low pressure) and low altitude 

(high pressure) conditions. 

This notice corrects the title for the 

test to read, ‘‘Altitude.’’ The tests 

themselves have not been changed. 

Test 16. Data Integrity and Format 

In the Federal Register notice 

published on May 8, 2013, there was a 

reference under Test 16 to Appendix D 

(78 FR 26866). This was a typographical 

error. There were only two appendices 

to that notice, Appendix A and 

Appendix B. 

This notice corrects that reference to 

Appendix B. 

B. Proposed Changes (About Which We 

Request Comments) 

The following changes are being 

proposed by the agency. The agency 

requests comments on these proposed 

changes. 

Test 8. Retest 

Test 8 of the Model Specifications 

include a series of tests to simulate the 

BAIID functions that must operate in 

connection with retests once the vehicle 

has been started, including an 

indication to the driver that a retest 

must be taken. Two commenters 

requested clarification regarding this 

test. Specifically, their questions related 

to provisions requiring that the BAIID 

‘‘indicate the need for a service call’’ 

and stating that ‘‘the BAIID must not 

allow the vehicle to start without a 

service call.’’ 

As provided in Test 8 of the Model 

Specifications, a failed retest must 

trigger an alert to the driver and be 

flagged (recorded) on the interlock data 

logger. A missed retest also must be 

flagged (recorded) on the data logger. 

Conformance will require verification 

that alerts were made and that these 

events were recorded on the data logger. 

In the Federal Register notice 

published on May 8, 2013, NHTSA 

expressed agreement with comments 

received that some decisions are 

programmatic in nature and should not 

be included in the Model Specifications. 

The Model Specifications are intended 

to apply to the performance of BAIID 

units, not the manner in which State 

and local jurisdictions conduct their 

programs (78 FR 26851). Consistent 

with this sentiment, NHTSA had 

intended to remove certain references, 

including those providing for the need 

for a service call in Test 8, but the 

agency inadvertently left them in this 

subsection. 

This notice proposes to correct the 

third sentence, in the first paragraph 

under Test 8b (78 FR 26864), which 

currently reads: ‘‘The BAIID must treat 

this test as a failed retest and 

prominently indicate the need for a 

service call.’’ This notice proposes to 

revise this sentence as follows: ‘‘The 

BAIID must treat this test as a failed 

retest and prominently alert the driver.’’ 

Test 9. Tampering and Circumvention 

One request for clarification related to 

elements of Test 9 in the Model 

Specifications, which test a BAIIDs 

ability to prevent tampering and 

circumvention. 

d. Warmed Air Sample 

The commenter asserted that ‘‘a 12 oz 

Styrofoam coffee cup with a plastic lid 

can never get enough pressure. It would 

be better to mirror CNRC version of 0.5L 

PLASTIC cup with a lid.’’ 

The purpose of Test 9d is to 

determine whether a warmed air sample 

(not from a person) can be pumped into 

a BAIID and cause an interlockequipped vehicle to start. In the Federal 

Register notice published on May 8, 

2013, NHTSA specified that a ‘‘foam 

coffee cup’’ with a ‘‘plastic lid’’ be used 

(78 FR 26864). However, the properties 

of the cup and lid are more important 

than the materials they are made from. 

This notice proposes to clarify that 

the cup must be insulated, but it need 

not be constructed of Styrofoam; and 

that the lid must be secure, but it need 

not be constructed of plastic. This 

notice proposes to change the first 

sentence of the instructions for this test 

by providing, ‘‘Prepare a 12-ounce 

insulated cup, fitted with a bubble tube 

inlet and a vent tube (rubber or tygon 

tubing), attached through a secure lid.’’ 

f. Filtered 0.032 BrAC Sample 

The commenter asserted that ‘‘The 

paper tube called for does not work. 

You can typically not build up enough 

pressure in the paper tube to trigger a 

sample at all, meaning the test is very 

easy to pass. If it were changed to any 

readily available material, it would be 

more effective to testing for the ability 

of the filtering material itself to filter out 

the alcohol and not just the fact that 

there is not enough pressure.’’ 

In the Federal Register notice 

published on May 8, 2013, Test 9f in the 

Model Specifications provided, 

‘‘Prepare a 1 to 2 inch diameter 3 to 5 

inches long paper tube loosely packed 

with an active absorbent material . . . 

[and using] cotton plugs to retain the 

absorbent [material] in the paper tube.’’ 

(78 FR 26864) 

The purpose of this test is to 

determine whether an interlockequipped vehicle would start if a person 

with alcohol in their system were to 

blow an air sample through a filter. 

NHTSA believes that using ‘‘a 1 to 2 

inch diameter 3 to 5 inches long paper 

tube loosely packed with an active 

absorbent material . . . [and using] 

cotton plugs to retain the absorbent 

[material] in the paper tube’’, as 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

16722 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices 

described in the Model Specifications, 

will permit a sufficient test under this 

section. To clarify, a cardboard tube can 

be used in lieu of thinner paper goods, 

and absorbent material can include 

charcoal, kitty litter or other materials 

that are readily available. Moreover, this 

test is not designed to determine the 

ability of any particular material to filter 

alcohol from an air sample. Rather, it is 

a test of the BAIID’s ability to detect 

whether an air sample containing 

alcohol has been filtered to remove the 

alcohol. 

Accordingly, this notice proposes to 

provide additional flexibility in the 

materials that may be used in 

conducting this test. It proposes to 

provide instead, ‘‘Prepare a 1 to 2 inch 

diameter 3 to 5 inches long tube loosely 

packed with an active absorbent 

material. Use porous plugs (such as 

cotton) to retain the absorbent material 

in the tube.’’ 

Test 10. Restart of Stalled Motor Vehicle 

In the Federal Register notice 

published on May 8, 2013, Test 10 in 

the Model Specifications stated that a 

restart without breath sample in less 

than 3 minutes should allow the vehicle 

to start, but then it stated, ‘‘Attempt to 

restart the ignition without a breath 

sample within 3 minutes . . . the 

vehicle must not start.’’ (78 FR 26865) 

The agency received comments, stating 

that these provisions appear 

contradictory and are confusing. 

This notice proposes to correct the 

Model Specifications as follows: 

‘‘Attempt to restart the engine without 

a breath sample in less than 3 minutes— 

the vehicle must start. Turn off the 

engine. Attempt to restart the engine 

without a breath sample 3 minutes or 

more after turning off the engine—the 

vehicle must not start.’’ If trying to start 

the vehicle after 3 minutes, a breath 

sample would need to be provided. 

Test 14. Radiofrequency Interference/

Electromagnetic Interference 

Test 14 of the Model Specifications is 

entitled ‘‘Radiofrequency Interference 

(RFI)/Electromagnetic Interference 

(EMI)’’. It contains a series of tests to 

evaluate BAIID for radiofrequency and 

electromagnetic immunity and 

compatibility. These tests are based on 

standards that are commonly used in 

the industry for motor vehicles and 

motor vehicle equipment, including 

Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) 

Surface Vehicle Standard J1113 series, 

Required Function Performance Status, 

as defined in Surface Vehicle Standard 

J113–1 for Class C devices and the 

International Special Committee on 

Radio Interference (CISPR), 

Subcommittee of International 

Electrotechnical Committee (IEC), 

CISPR 25. 

In conducting its assessment of the 

RFI/EMI tests, NHTSA determined that 

some aspects of Test 14 required 

correction and/or clarification. This 

notice proposes a number of revisions to 

account for these issues. 

a. Drive and Standby Modes 

The Model Specifications provide that 

Test 14 ‘‘must be performed while the 

BAIID is in the drive and standby 

modes.’’ During our assessment, we 

observed no differences between the 

RFI/EMC test results obtained in 

standby (ready to blow) mode and the 

results obtained in drive mode. 

Therefore, testing in Drive mode 

appears to be unnecessary. For this 

reason, NHTSA proposes to revise the 

Model Specifications to provide that 

Test 14 need only ‘‘be performed in 

standby mode.’’ 

b. Frequency Range of Tests 14c. and 

14f 

The Model Specifications specifies 

the frequency range for some, but not 

all, tests to be performed under Test 14. 

In particular, the Model Specifications 

did not specify the frequency range for 

Test 14c (J1113–4 2004–08 Conducted 

Immunity—Bulk Current Injection (BCI) 

Method). Consistent with SAE 

Standards, this notice proposes to add 

that Test 14c should be performed from 

1 MHz to 400 MHz. 

Normally, the frequency ranges of 

Test 14c and Test 14f (J1113–21 2005– 

10 Immunity to Electromagnetic Fields) 

are run as companion tests. Together, 

they cover the entire frequency range of 

a device being tested. Accordingly, 

consistent with SAE Standards, this 

notice proposes to revise the Model 

Specification to provide that Test 14f 

should be performed from 400 MHz to 

18 GHz. Combined with Test 14c, the 

entire frequency range of 1 MHz to 18 

GHz would be covered. 

c. Clarification of Conditions Under Test 

14d, Pulse 5 

The Model Specifications identified 

the final pulse under Test 14d as Pulse 

5, but this pulse should have been 

identified as Pulse 5a. This notice 

proposes to make that correction. The 

parameters of the test will remain 

unchanged. It should continue to be 

conducted at Level 1, with 87 volts. As 

before, to conform to the test, a BAIID 

must achieve Status IV (no damage to 

function after disturbance is removed; 

dealer action may be required to return 

the function to normal operation after 

the disturbance is removed, e.g., battery 

reset). 

The agency encourages interested 

parties to carefully review this notice 

and the proposed revisions to the Model 

Specifications that are described herein, 

and to submit comments in the manner 

identified in the Addresses above. 

Techical Corrections to Text of Model 

Specifications 

For convenience and clarity, the full 

text of the Tests that are corrected are 

included below. 

1. In the Federal Register of May 8, 

2013, on page 26864, in column 3, Test 

9e is corrected to read as follows: 

Test 9. Tampering and Circumvention 

* * * * * 

e. Cooled 0.032 BrAC sample. Attach 

a 4 foot long tygon tube of 3/8 inch 

inside diameter which has been cooled 

to ice water temperature (0 °C/32 °F) to 

the inlet of the BAIID, then test at 0.032 

BrAC. The vehicle must not start. 

2. In the Federal Register of May 8, 

2013, on page 26865, in column 1, the 

title for Test 11 is corrected to read as 

follows: 

Test 11. Altitude 

3. In the Federal Register of May 8, 

2013, on page 26866, in column 1, Test 

16 is corrected to read as follows: 

Test 16. Data Integrity and Format 

Complete all other tests before 

performing Test 16. Download the data 

from the interlock data logger and 

compare it to the data recorded for each 

test. Disconnect, then reconnect the 

power to the interlock data logger. 

Download the data again and compare 

it to the first data download. No lost or 

corrupted data is allowed. Check the 

data format (i.e., date and time of event) 

to verify conformance with the sample 

format in Appendix B. 

Proposed Changes to Text of Model 

Specifications 

1. NHTSA proposes to revise the 

Model Specifications published in the 

Federal Register of May 8, 2013, on 

page 26864, in column 1, Test 8 to read 

as follows: 

Test 8. Retest 

If a BAIID includes a feature designed 

to detect whether the vehicle is moving, 

conduct Test 8 using a motor vehicle. If 

a BAIID does not include a feature 

designed to detect whether the vehicle 

is moving, conduct Test 8 using a motor 

vehicle or a bench test set-up that 

simulates the relevant functions of a 

motor vehicle. 

a. Within an interval of 5 to 7 minutes 

after a vehicle successfully starts, using 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 60 / Monday, March 30, 2015 / Notices 16723 

a 0.000 g/dL BrAC test sample, and 

while the engine is still running, the 

BAIID must indicate that a second 

breath sample is required. Conduct Test 

1b five times. The BAIID must treat this 

test as a passed retest all 5 times. 

b. Within an interval of 5 to 7 minutes 

after a vehicle successfully starts, using 

a 0.000 g/dL BrAC test sample, and 

while the engine is still running, the 

BAIID must indicate that a second 

breath sample is required. Conduct Test 

1c five times. The BAIID must treat this 

test as a failed retest and prominently 

alert the driver. 

A failed retest must be identified as 

an alert condition and flagged on the 

interlock data logger. A missed retest 

must be flagged on the interlock data 

logger. 

2. NHTSA proposes to revise the 

Model Specifications published in the 

Federal Register of May 8, 2013, on 

page 26864, in columns 2–3, Test 9d 

and Test 9f to read as follows: 

Test 9. Tampering and Circumvention 

* * * * * 

d. Warmed air sample. Prepare a 12- 

ounce insulated cup fitted with a bubble 

tube inlet and a vent tube (rubber or 

tygon tubing), attached through a secure 

lid. Fill the cup with 8 ounces of water 

warmed to 36°C and attach the lid. 

Attach the vent tube to the BAIID and 

pass an air sample of at least 2 liters 

through the bubble tube into the heated 

water and thence into the BAIID. The 

flow rate must not be high enough to 

cause a mechanical transfer of water to 

the BAIID. The vehicle must not start. 

* * * * * 

f. Filtered 0.032 BrAC sample. Prepare 

a 1 to 2 inch diameter 3 to 5 inches long 

tube loosely packed with an active 

absorbent material. Use porous plugs 

(such as cotton) to retain the absorbent 

material in the tube. Pack the tube so 

that a person can easily blow 2 liters of 

air through the assembly within 5 

seconds. Test the absorbent by passing 

a 2 liter 0.032 BrAC sample though the 

assembly within 5 seconds. If the air 

passing out of the BAIID is found to 

have a concentration of 0.006 BrAC or 

less, prepare 5 tubes packed in the same 

manner, fit separately to the BAIID and 

test at 0.032 BrAC. The vehicle must not 

start. 

* * * * * 

4. NHTSA proposes to revise the 

Model Specifications published in the 

Federal Register of May 8, 2013, on 

page 26865, in column 1, Test 10 to read 

as follows: 

Test 10. Restart of Stalled Motor Vehicle 

Conduct Test 10 using a motor 

vehicle. 

Using a 0.000 g/dL BrAC sample, turn 

on the engine. Turn off the engine. 

Attempt to restart the ignition without 

a breath sample in less than 3 minutes— 

the vehicle must start. Turn off the 

engine. Attempt to restart the engine 

without a breath sample 3 minutes or 

more after turning off the engine—the 

vehicle must not start. Conduct Test 10 

five times. 

5. NHTSA proposes to revise Test 14 

of the Model Specifications published 

in the Federal Register of May 8, 2013, 

beginning on page 26865, in column 1, 

to read as follows: 

Test 14. Radiofrequency Interference 

(RFI)/Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) 

The Society of Automotive Engineers 

(SAE) Surface Vehicle Standard J1113 

series, Required Function Performance 

Status, as defined in Surface Vehicle 

Standard J1113–1 for Class C devices 

(devices essential to the operation or 

control of the vehicle), and the 

International Special Committee on 

Radio Interference (CISPR), 

Subcommittee of International 

Electrotechnical Committee (IEC), 

specifically CISPR 25, will be used to 

evaluate BAIID electromagnetic 

immunity and compatibility. The test 

severity levels are specified below. The 

tests must be performed while the 

BAIID is in standby mode. 

* * * * * 

c. J1113–4 2004–08 Conducted 

immunity, 1 MHz to 400 MHz—Bulk 

Current Injection (BCI) Method. 

Level 

Severity 

(volts, peak 

to peak) 

Status 

1 ........................... 25 to 60 ........ I 

2 ........................... 60 to 80 ........ II 

3 ........................... 80 to 100 ...... III 

4 ........................... 100 ............... IV 

d. J1113–11 2007–06 Immunity to 

Conducted Transients on Power Leads. 

Pulse 

(12 v sys) Level Severity (volts) Status 

1 ............. 1 ¥25 I 

2 ¥50 II 

3 ¥75 II 

4 ¥100 IV 

2a ........... 1 25 I 

2 40 II 

3 50 II 

4 75 IV 

2b ........... 1 10 I 

3a ........... 1 ¥35 I 

2 ¥75 II 

3 ¥112 II 

Pulse 

(12 v sys) Level Severity (volts) Status 

4 ¥150 IV 

3b ........... 1 25 I 

2 50 II 

3 75 II 

4 100 IV 

4 ............. 1 ¥4 I 

2 ¥5 II 

3 ¥6 II 

4 ¥7 IV 

5a ........... 1 87 IV 

* * * * * 

f. J1113–21 2005–10 Immunity to 

Electromagnetic Fields, 400 MHz to 18 

GHz. 

Severity (V/M) Status 

Up to 60 ......................................... I 

60–80 ............................................. II 

80–100 ........................................... III 

100–150 ......................................... IV 

(Authority: 23 U.S.C. 403; 49 CFR 1.95; 49 

CFR Part 501) 

Dated: March 25, 2015. 

Jeffrey Michael, 

Associate Administrator for the Office of 

Research and Program Development, 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2015–07161 Filed 3–27–15; 8:45 a.m.] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Office of the Secretary 

[Docket No. DOT–OST–2012–0087] 

Advisory Committee for Aviation 

Consumer Protection 

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary (OST), 

Department of Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Notice of seventh meeting of 

advisory committee. 

SUMMARY: This notice announces the 

seventh meeting of the Advisory 

Committee for Aviation Consumer 

Protection. 

DATES: The seventh meeting of the 

advisory committee is scheduled for 

April 14, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 

p.m., Eastern Time. 

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in 

the Media Center (located on the lobby 

level of the West Building) at the U.S. 

Department of Transportation (DOT) 

headquarters, 1200 New Jersey Avenue 

SE., Washington, DC. Attendance is 

open to the public up to the room’s 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES