alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1997
<CASH>                                              52
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                     15,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,097
<PP&E>                                           3,417
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,005
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,689
<BONDS>                                          4,246
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              840
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            41
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,188
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,005
<SALES>                                         18,565
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,573
<CGS>                                           14,032
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,213
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 559
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (249)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (249)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.06)
        

</TABLE>
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201300137

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

FRANCIS L. CAPTAIN

Sergeant (E-5), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Commander John A. Maksym, JAGC, USN.

For Appellant: Captain David A. Peters, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 30 November 2016

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, RUGH, and HUTCHISON, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

The supplemental court-martial order will include the following corrected 

summary of Specification 2 under Charge I:

In that Sergeant Francis L. Captain, U.S. Marine Corps, on 

active duty, did, at Iwakuni, Japan, on or about 17 January 

2012, cause Mrs. RMN to engage in sexual contact, to wit: 

Sergeant Francis L. Captain digitally penetrated the buttocks 

and anus of Mrs. RNM, who was substantially incapacitated or 

substantially incapable of declining participation in the sexual 

contact or substantially incapable of communicating 

unwillingness to engage in the sexual contact.

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Robert E. Sulentic, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Trammell Crow Company;

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
|                      | /s/  Robert E. Sulentic    |
|---------------------------|----------------------------|
|                      | Robert E.  Sulentic        |
|                      | *Chief  Executive Officer* |
| Date: March 15, 2004 |                       |

 

 

----
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Ruvo, Richard

Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 11:08 AM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Cc: Mangels, Karl; McHale, Mary; R2 CASD-APB-APS

Subject: FW: Start-Up, Shut-Down, Malfunction (SSM) SIP Call Final Action 

Importance: High

_____________________________________________

From: Filippelli, John  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 11:32 AM

To: Bill.O'Sullivan@dep.state.nj.us

Cc: Iglesias, Ariel; Ruvo, Richard

Subject: Start‐Up, Shut‐Down, Malfunction (SSM) SIP Call Final Action  

Importance: High

Bill,  

This is to follow‐up on our conversation this morning about today’s SSM SIP Call.  

The SSM SIP Call final action was signed this morning by the Administrator and the pre‐publication version of

the FR notice will be posted on the website by early afternoon today. It will be available at

http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html. Here it is attached:

Below is an electronic version of the letter to State Air Directors that you will be receiving from Acting Assistant

Administrator, Janet McCabe.   

Please let me know if you have any questions.   

John

_____________________________  

John Filippelli

Division Director

Clean Air and Sustainability Division

U.S. EPA ‐ Region 2

(212) 637‐3736
2

filippelli.john@epa.gov
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NICHOLAS MARTIN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 281 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
<PAGE>



                         Independent Accountant's Report


November 4, 1996

To the Board of Directors
of Oakwood Acceptance Corporation


We have examined management's assertion about Oakwood Acceptance Corporation's
(the "Company") compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) as of and for the year ended September 30, 1996
included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for
the Company's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended
September 30, 1996 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Price Waterhouse LLP





<PAGE>




November 4, 1996


Price Waterhouse LLP
Suite 1800
200 West 2nd Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended September 30, 1996, Oakwood Acceptance Corporation
(OAC) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (the "USAP"). As of and for this same
period, OAC had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of $5,000,000 and $1,400,000 respectively.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
<S>                                                  <C>
/s/ Nicholas J St. George                            /s/ C. Michael Kilbourne
Nicholas J. St. George, Chief Executive Officer      C. Michael Kilbourne, Financial Officer





/s/ Michael D. Rutherford                            /s/ Douglass R Muir
Michael D. Rutherford, Controller                    Douglas R. Muir, VP, Treasurer/Secretary





/s/ Larry T. Gilmore                                 /s/ Jimmy S. Griffin
Larry T. Gilmore, EVP-Consumer Finance               Jimmy S. Griffin, VP-Loan Servicing
</TABLE>
# C_2016103EN.01000401.xml

| 18.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/4

---

Call for proposals under the multiannual work programme for granting financial aid in the field of the trans-European energy infrastructure under the Connecting Europe Facility for period 2014-2020

(Commission Decision C(2016) 1587)

(2016/C 103/04)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Energy, is hereby launching a call for proposals in order to award grants in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the multiannual work programme in the field of the trans-European energy infrastructure under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020.

Proposals are invited for the following call:

CEF-Energy-2016-1

The indicative amount available for the selected proposals under this call for proposals is EUR 200 million.

The deadline for the submission of proposals is 28 April 2016.

28 April 2016

The complete text of the call for proposals is available on: https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-energy/calls/2016-cef-energy-first-calls-proposals

---
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals** 
**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JOSE ANTONIO COSSIO, JR., Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

M ichael B. D onley , SECRETARY OF THE AIR

FORCE AND DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, Defendants

- Appellees.

______________________

2012

- 1662

______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Illinois in No. 11

- CV

- 9178, Judge Harry D. Leinenweber.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R

Jose Antonio Cossio, Jr. moves unopposed to wit hdra w his motion to stay the appeal

. Cossio also moves for an extension to file his reply brief, and for leave to file a reply brief of up to 7,000 words

. A copy of the reply brief is attached to Cossio's motion

for leave. Case: 12-1662 Document: 28 Page: 1 Filed: 04/30/2013JOSE COSSIO v. AIR FORCE 2

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :

(1) The motion to withdraw Cossio’s motion to stay is granted.

(2) Cossio’s motion for an extension of time is gran ted.

(3) Cossio's motion for leave is granted. The reply brief attached to the motion for leave is accepted for filing.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly

Clerk

s25 Case: 12-1662 Document: 28 Page: 2 Filed: 04/30/2013
#### John vs. The State.

1. Forging an instrument which is invalid upon its face, does not constitute the crime of forgery.

2. Where an indictment for forging an indorsement upon a draft, purported to set out the draft in full, and it did not appear to he stamped: *Held*(on motion in arrest of judgment), that the indictment was had.

ERROR to the Circuit Court for *Winnebago*County.

*Felher dk Weisbrod,*for plaintiff in error.

*The Attorney-General,*for the state.

Paine, J.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for forging an indorsement upon a draft, and on the trial was convicted. A motion in arrest of judgment was made, upon the ground that there was no allegation that the draft was stamped, and that *505being set out in full in tbe indictment, it did not appear to be stamped.

Tbe authorities cited by counsel show, that to forge an instrument wbicb upon its face is of no validity or binding force, does not constitute tbe crime of forgery. And indeed no authorities would seem necessary for so plain a proposition. So soon as it appears that tbe alleged draft is no draft, but a mere void paper, it follows that tbe party was not guilty of forging an indorsement upon a draft.

There can be no question that, under the act of congress, an unstamped draft is void. It expressly declares that papers required to be stamped shall be void if not stamped. So that tbe inquiry is, whether it appears affirmatively on the face of the indictment that this draft was not stamped, or, if that did not appear, whether it would be necessary to allege affirmatively that it was stamped.

In the case of *Jones v.*Davis, 22 Wis. 421, we held, that in a civil suit, an allegation that a party conveyed land by a deed imported that the deed was stamped, if a stamp was essential to its validity. But whether such a rule could be allowed in criminal pleadings, it is not now necessary to determine, as it is to be inferred from the face of the indictment that this draft was not stamped. The draft is set out in full, and there is no indication of any stamp upon it. It is fair, therefore, to say that it appears affirmatively that it was not stamped, and was for that reason void.

This being so, the forging of the indorsement of the payee did not constitute the crime of forgery, and the motion in arrest should have been granted.

*By the Court.*— The judgment is reversed.

*

 The offense was charged to have been committed in February, 1867. Bef.
Exhibit
21.1




Subsidiaries
of Registrant listing state of incorporation





Name
                          
                          State of
    IncorporationPRI
      Medical Technologies, Inc.
                          
                          
                          NevadaMedical
      Resources Management Financial, Inc.
                          
                          
                          CaliforniaFront
      Range Holmium Laser, LLC
                          
                          
                          CaliforniaGolden
      Gate Holmium Laser, LLC
                          
                          
                          CaliforniaLaser
      Venture 1, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareLaser
      Venture 2, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareLaser
      Venture 3, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareLitho
      Venture 1, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareLitho
      Venture 2, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareCryo
      Venture 2, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareCryo
      Venture 3, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareCryo
      Venture 4, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareCryo
      Venture 5, LLC
                          
                          
                          DelawareLitho
      Venture 3, LLC
                          
                          
                          Delaware
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE SECOND QUARTER 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          53,001
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  607,773
<ALLOWANCES>                                    80,809
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,415,931
<PP&E>                                         717,851
<DEPRECIATION>                                 433,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,703,669
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,642,122
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        78,547
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,080,230)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,703,669
<SALES>                                      1,516,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,516,306
<CGS>                                        1,021,506
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,843,927
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (380,923)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       489
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (381,412)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (381,412)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016176EN.01000201.xml

| 18.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 May 2016

(2016/C 176/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1318 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4386 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3513 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1080 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2558 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,022 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,25 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3621 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4865 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3575 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5457 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4631 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7849 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6651 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5501 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,66 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6561 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3867 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4928 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 074,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5481 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,581 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,3700 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,168 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9451 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7275 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,6285 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1318

JPY

Japanese yen

123,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4386

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78150

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3513

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1080

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2558

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,022

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,25

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3621

RON

Romanian leu

4,4865

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3575

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5457

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4631

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7849

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6651

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5501

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,66

ZAR

South African rand

17,6561

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3867

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4928

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 074,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5481

PHP

Philippine peso

52,581

RUB

Russian rouble

73,3700

THB

Thai baht

40,168

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9451

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7275

INR

Indian rupee

75,6285

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016281EN.01000201.xml

| 3.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7883 — NPM Capital/Thijs Hendrix Beheer/Hendrix Genetics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 281/03)

On 15 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7883. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7883. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---