alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T L E WI S HA GG AR D, P et i t i on er- A pp el l ee , v. B E N C U R R Y , W ar de n, R e s p o n d e n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 16819 D . C. N o . 3 : 0 6 - c v - 0 7 6 5 8 - SI ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e N o rth e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S us an I l l s t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d D e c e m be r19, 2011 ** B e f o r e : G O O D W I N , W A L L A C E , an dM c K E O W N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . B e n C u rryap p e a ls f

r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t g r an tin g C a lif o rn ia s t a t e pr i s one rL e w i s H a ggar d’ s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S . C . § 2253, a nd w e va c a t e a nd r e m and. 

# FI LED DE C 23 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16819 2 T he di s tr i c tc ourtgr ant e d r e l i e f i n c onne c t i on w i th the B oar d of P r i s on T erm s’ 20 04 deci si on t o d eny H aggard parol e. Int erveni ng S up re m e C ou rt au th o r itye x p la in s th a t th e o n lyf e d e r a l r ig h t a t is s u e in th e p ar o le c o n te x t is pr oc e dur a l , a nd the onl ypr ope ri nqui ryi s w ha tpr oc e s s the i nm a t e r e c e i ve d, not w h e th e rth e s ta te c o u rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . See Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S. C t . 85 9, 86 2-63 (201 1) (percuri am ). B ec ause H aggard rai se d n o p roce du ra l c h a lle n g e s , w e r e v e r s e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s ju d g m e n t. W e e x p r e s s n o o p in io n o n th e m e r its o f H a g g ar d ’s c la im s c o n c e rn in g h is pl e aa gr e e m e nt . W e l e a ve t o the di s tr i c tc ourtr e s ol ut i on of thos e c l a i m s on r e m a nd. V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7751

ST. AUBYN SEBASTIAN GAYLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 08-6036

ST. AUBYN SEBASTIAN GAYLE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:05-cv-00681-REP)

Submitted: April 24, 2008 Decided: April 28, 2008
- 2 -

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

St. Aubyn Sebastian Gayle, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell

Theisen, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond,

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*Though Gayle has filed a motion for production of documents

pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, the Act is not

applicable to federal courts. 5 U.S.C. §§ 551(1)(B), 552(f)(1)

(2000).

- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

St. Aubyn Sebastian Gayle appeals the district court’s

orders denying his motion to toll the limitation period for filing

a motion for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) and

his motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Gayle v. Johnson, No.

3:05-cv-00681-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 15, 2007 & Dec. 18, 2007).

Additionally, we deny Gayle’s motion for production of documents.*

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT 21
 SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
 Jurisdiction ofSubsidiary
    
    IncorporationMidway Interactive Inc.
    
    DelawareMidway Home Entertainment Inc.
    
    DelawareMidway Games West Inc. (formerly, Atari Games Corporation)
    
    CaliforniaMidway Games Sales Corporation
    
    BarbadosMidway Games (Europe) GmbH
    
    GermanyMidway Games Limited
    
    United KingdomMidway Amusement Games, LLC
    
    Delaware (LLC)Midway Sales Company, LLC
    
    Delaware (LLC)Midway Home Studios Inc.
    
    DelawareK. K. Midway Games
    
    JapanMidway Games Canada Corp.
    
    CanadaSurreal Software Inc.
    
    WashingtonMidway Studios  Austin Inc.
    
    TexasMidway Studios  Los Angeles Inc.
    
    CaliforniaMidway Games GmbH
    
    GermanyMidway Australia Holdings Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaRatbag Holdings Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaMidway Studios  Australia Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaMidway Games  Australia Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaMidway Studios Development  Australia Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaRatbag Studios Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaRatbag Productions Pty Ltd
    
    AustraliaMidway Studios  Newcastle Limited
    
    United KingdomMidway Games SAS
    
    France
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 21, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40221 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE SANTOS DE LEON-ROCHA, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-765-ALL

-------------------- Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Santos De Leon-Rocha appeals from his guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute in excess of 50 kilograms of marijuana. De Leon contends for the first time on appeal that 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) are facially unconstitutional in view of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000). He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Slaughter , 238 F.3d 580 (5th Cir. 2000), but he seeks to preserve his argument for further review.No. 04-40221 -2-
In Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 490, the Supreme Court held that “[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” This court has rejected the argument that Apprendi rendered the sentencing provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841 facially unconstitutional. See Slaughter , 238 F.3d at 582. As De Leon concedes, the court’s opinion in Slaughter forecloses his argument. See id

. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Immer Jonathan a/k/a Immer Perez * From the 35th District Court

a/k/a Immer Najera, of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CR22641.

Vs. No. 11-14-00321-CR * November 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<PAGE>


                             POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, William P. Leiser and J.
Christopher Kirk and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with
full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place
and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the
case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full power and
authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming
all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.




                                                   /s/ Derek R. McClain
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Derek R. McClain
# C_2016347EN.01000201.xml

| 22.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8101 — Siemens/Valeo/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 347/02)

On 14 September 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8101. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8101. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,
                           AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the amended Quarterly Report of Tac Asset Corp.
(the "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB/A  for  the period ended March  31, 2003, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I,  Anthony N. DeMint,  President  and Chief Accounting Officer of
the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in  all
          material   respects,  the  financial  condition  and   results   of
          operations of the Company.



			      /s/ Anthony DeMint
                              Anthony N. DeMint
                              President and Chief Accounting Officer
                              August 28, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          96,747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   45,564
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (955)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               258,878<F1>
<PP&E>                                          19,875
<DEPRECIATION>                                (13,566)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 326,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          158,942<F2>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           339
<OTHER-SE>                                     136,733
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   326,236
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               313,639
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  325,511
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,515
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,387)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,367)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,020)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,020)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.42)
<FN>
<F1>INCLUDES REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE OF $98,567
<F2>INCLUDES NOTES PAYABLE ON REAL ESTATE HELD FOR SALE OF $76,623
</FN>


</TABLE>
**Exhibit31.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I,Eldad Eilam, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of hopTo Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report.

 

EldadEilam

ChiefExecutive Officer

April29, 2016
Exhibit 10.36 


 


Below is the Power of Attorney issued by Shufen
Xiao to Pure Value Trading Company (Shanghai) Limited (referred to below as “Zhifu Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.”). Certain
identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it is both immaterial and is the type that the registrant treats as
private and confidential.


 


POWER OF ATTORNEY


 


I, Shufen Xiao (肖淑芬),
a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) and holder of PRC resident ID card number [XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX],
in my capacity as a shareholder of Jihuiduo (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd, (积惠多(北京)科技有限公司,
“Company”), hereby irrevocably grant to any individual appointed in writing (“Authorised Person”)by
Zhifu Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. (志福商贸(上海)
有限公司) in its sole discretion the authority to exercise the following powers and rights during the term
of this Power of Attorney:


 


		(a)	to receive all notices on my behalf regarding the shareholders’ meetings of the Company;



 


		(b)	to vote on my behalf at such shareholders meetings;



 


		(c)	to make any decisions on my behalf in accordance with my rights as a shareholder of the Company as granted
to me by law and in accordance with the Company’s articles of association; and



 


		(d)	to sign any relevant documents on my behalf and to take any action on my behalf as a shareholder of the
Company,



 


During the term of this Power of Attorney, I shall
not, without the prior written consent of the Authorised Person, exercise any of the powers and/or rights listed above.


 


This Power of Attorney will enter into effect
upon signing and will remain effective and irrevocable until all of my equity in the Company has been transferred to the Company or an
Authorised Person (or both). This Power of Attorney will survive and remain valid and effective in the event of my death or mental or
physical incapacity.


 


	 	Name:	Shufen Xiao (肖淑芬)
	 	 	 
	 	Signature:	/s/ Shufen Xiao
	 	Date:
REF ID:A719~ 

IPS ~11.5.....o.neral 

~ tor .l O eL I, G-11 

1. J."9.Gtl9d •rn. a a ~ or MrtaiD ewnea or 1.m\nlni• 

la Oinrtaap-.ptcr ... O~la "1' ._. Yorll Uainrelv in eonnea\1-

wi~ ~r 1o-e&l.W ~1.on Uld ~ ownN• 

>. !!w pl1Ml,..t. Wl•W. \Mt tM ®'U"M• I.ft ~ lV .__,... Dasal4 I>. »UUJt:ta•,. llhioh would impJr ..- ..... ~ .lnr .,_.was.,. I~ la .n be~ ...._, lt\Ulh •J*18enb.i.p la t.Nt in 

,.... .m 1t s.. rueew that -. •••11111on ot ..... ton Uldnr- d• MAl••ri•J.M M •U.OW to tk1a ~. 

1. ID ~ emnr.-1.a intOIW.'1- -. ,,_~ us '° ~ etth'\ 

-.t 11r. wsn11&tw •w wUeiMq cliMfptia'94 'try .a. laclk ot ~ 

ai\l• ............. )da ...... .rtol"U <• ~· ~)· ... t.M'\ ... i... ...... ,,_. M Witll .. d>iact- llad 'lw f oric l.nr ~tille, U ... u 

u w... "' .... tw w....-.. •• .._.. M'UW Ma~.· 

... ,_ ..... ._ 11b1•..,.. al.Me'\ .. u~ ...... rwtlaA •• tna 

•• ., ... ,iac in .. ~ .w1'1l •aboola wM• &,. ott.rt.nc .,,..-p&pt.1• 

• 1 ca••• Mt ._.,_,.. \o a111W.,, oomrol or ~loo.. laperiw 

-. 1adi•W _. ~Ui~ ot ldU\&17 eClldnl ,,.,.,. Wo.-tl• 

'-lhc With......- o etatl~ _. iu\Ninua 1n ~ ti•1'• ........ ,.. tbei 4ftllJ' t1aM it ... lr&ble and •••1&17 Diet ..q to 

inlltl'\Aft 1u .. unto1:ia;ih1e penG111Wl ~ alff to .. i.n •U!lh 

,.1"943DD9l• by ,....... Wbict& it ~ an. Mt \If &ad oantrol. 

~.It 1• ~te<i tla't hr ""•r ".u.rl.ty ud oontrol ot lm'o~ •tim re&aJ"dinc W7'J>~ and. ~11, •W,. be _._ a\ 

CllWMl to ~ \IM giTbc or OOW"'MI 1a the .. wbj..u by :MD11111-.,Y apnetee. lno14mdlalq aQOb di•~ Will altlo pnb&bq 

1-Te a deeirable ........ S.111m\ ettH\ ~ els.ina~1Jtc fl"M'T8Upt1W ._, 

wm'uted.lT _,.....rM ta ~ ab4e or ~ punuJ.ac sMh oo~ 

at theH priT&te laRituti.-. 

fotii: 't'-.c ci,;ef s.i\11...t.I off,~u·: 

".e.sic Filo 

m "'. lli11Ci0k 

Colcmel. Si.pal Corpe 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-23-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Fulcrum Fund Limited
Partnership (the "Company") for the quarterly period ending December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Gary J. Yannazzo, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Kenmar Advisory Corp., as the General Partner of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities
                        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
                  (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company.

 By:              /s/ Gary J. Yannazzo
         -----------------------------------
 Name:   Gary J. Yannazzo
         Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

March 31, 2003
[491ll-13-

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFRPart39 

# OC/C)I I (Docket No. FAA-2010-+++!;t>irectorate Identifier 2010-NM-I07-AD] RlN 2120-AA64 Ainvorthiness Directives; LeaIjet Inc. Model 45 Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew aiIworthiness directive (AD) for all Learje

incorrect routing, and related investigative and corrective actions ifnecessary. This proposed AD results from reports ofwire damage onthe pilot and copilot circuit bre ~er panels caused by ashan circuit between chafed wires. We are proposing this AD to detect and correct damaged ormisrouted wires" which could result in a short circuit d flOU'l,,,,, 5'''"'''- consequent accumulation oftoxic gases intbe crew compartment and the loss ofsyst ms 

# I t"""'LSlSIG"ATU~~ associated with the wiring (including fire suppr1essionfunction for one engine and 

### ~" essential avionics systems). DATES: We must receive comments on !his proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICA nON INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may send corrunents by any ofthe following methods: AOI,ltl"G SY><lIOl,. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://wv.rw.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions 

### faTsubmitting c~mments .

• Fax: 202-493-2251.

FAAForm 1360-14.1 (6·89) OFFICIALALE COPy

## 14910-I3-PJ IlEPARTII'1ENT O~~tRANSPORTATlON 

# I
Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 3.9 (Docket No. FM-2010-++++j Dir~ctoratc Identifier 201~-NM-I07-ADI RIN 2120-AA64 

# I Ain\"orthincss Dircctiv,cs; Learjet Inc. Model 45 Airplanes



## · - I AGEN(;Y: Federal Aviation A:dministration (~AA), DOT.

· 

# , ACUON: Notice-of proposed ruler-naking (NPR1vf). SUMMARY: We propose 19adopt anc\~'airwbrthiness directive (AD) for'all Learjet Inc. Model 45 airplanes. 1111S proposed AD woJl1d.reQUire a,general visu~l in{l,pection to detect wires locat~d near the'circuit breaker paJ,cl mOlmting bracket [or damage and incorrect rouJing, and rClatcd invesiigntivc and !oITec;i~'e actions ifnecessary. This 'proposed AD~Jestilts from reports ofwire dama~e on the pilot and copilot ~ircuit b[eake panels eallsed by a sh~f( bireuit betweell ehaled lWires.We are pcoposing this AD to detect and correct damaged or mlsrouted wires. f\'hIChcould result Hl a short CirCUit an cQnsequ~nt.flccumul~f~of1ofloxl(: gases

# inthe c

# ew compartment and ~hcJoss of system. associated with the wiring (including fire sllPpr~sion function for one engine arid essential avionics systems). ~ATES:. We m.llS! rccciye COIl}ments on this prlPo~cdAD by [I1\lSERT DATE 45 DAYS AI'TER DATE qF PUBLiCATION INTHE FEDERAL REGISTER]~ AnD~ESSES: You nU\Y,sendcbmmcnls byani of the followin.g methods:

• Federal eRulefriaRing Portal: Go 10 http://www.rcgulations.gov. Follow the instruCtions for sllbmiHing comments.

• Fax: z02-49:3-225l. NT!

FAil Form 1350·14.1 (6..e9) I OFFIC!/,L fll.E 

# cpr1Y