alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, )
)
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
) Cr. ID. No. 1308012601
)
SEBASTIAN MICHEL, )
)
Defendant.

Submitted: August 23, 2016
Decided: November 30, 2016

Upon Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation on Defendant’s Motion for
Appointment of Counsel and Motion for Postconviction Relief

ADOPTED
ORDER

This 30th day of November, 2016, the Court has considered the
Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation, Defendant’s Motion for
Appointment of Counsel, Defendant’s Motion for Postconviction Relief, and the
relevant proceedings below.

On March 23, 2016, Defendant Sebastian Michel filed this pro se motion for
Appointment of Counsel and Postconviction relief. The motion was referred to a
Superior Court Commissioner in accordance with 10 Del. C. § 512(b) and Superior

Court Criminal Rule 62 for proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The


Commissioner issued the Report and Recommendation on July 21, 2016. The
Commissioner recommended that Defendant’s Motions for Appointment of
Counsel and Postconviction Relief be denied.

“Within ten days after filing of a Commissioner’s proposed Report and
Recommendation . . . any party may serve and file written objections.” Neither
party has filed an objection to the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation.

The Court holds that the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation
dated July 21, 2016, should be adopted for the reasons set forth therein. The
Commissioner’s findings are not clearly erroneous, are not contrary to law, and are
not an abuse of discretion.”

THEREFORE, after careful and de novo review of the record in this action,
the Court hereby adopts the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendation in its
entirety. Defendant’s Motions for Appointment of Counsel and Postconviction

Relief are hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. i. ssex

a VA
The Honorable Mary M. Johnston

' Super. Ct. Crim. R. 62(a)(5)(ii).
2 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 62(a)(4)(iv).
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**Company**
**Form      10-Q**

|   | (1) | the                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | information                contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                Thomas S. Rooney, Jr.             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas                S. Rooney, Jr.                 |
|   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6770

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DESHAWN JAMEL GREENE, a/k/a Train,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:10-cr-00144-WO-1; 1:14-cv-00900-

WO-LPA)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deshawn Jamel Greene, Appellant Pro Se. Harry L. Hobgood, Angela 

Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, 

North Carolina; Robert Albert Jamison Lang, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Deshawn Jamel Greene seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Greene has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### McLean vs. Bovee.

*Bjectment*— drop *planted after action com/meneed.*

One who recovers land in ej ectment is entitled to the crop of wheat thereon, partly cut and partly uncut, which was planted after the action was commenced.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Calumet*County.

The plaintiff appealed from a judgment for the defendant. The case is stated in the opinion.

*Gillet & Pier,*for appellant.

[No brief.]

*E. S.*Bragg, for respondent,

cited *Doe ex dem. Upton v.*Wetherwicke, 3 Bing. 11-; *Hodgson v.*Gascoigne, 5 B. & A. 88 ; 8 Wend. 584; Adams on Ejectment, 416.

Paiíte, J.

The defendant in this suit recovered certain premises of the plaintiff in an action for the recovery of real property. He was put in possession under the judgment, and took possession of a crop of wheat, part of which had been cut and a part of which was still uncut at the time he took the land. This action was brought to recover for this taking of the wheat, and the question is, which of the parties was entitled to it *%*

The authorities cited by the respondent’s counsel seem .to show, that, upon the facts here presented, the crop belonged to the defendant. It was sowed long after the suit to recover the land was begun, and there is no fact upon which the case can be taken out of the rule they establish.

*By the Gourt.*— The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
# CA2015149EN.01000201.xml

| 6.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 149/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 149/2

---

Corrigendum to notice of open competition EPSO/AD/301/15 — Administrators (AD 5)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 92 A of 19 March 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 92 A of 19 March 2015

(2015/C 149 A/02)

On page 1:

| for: | ‘Deadline for registration: 21 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

for:

‘Deadline for registration: 21 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’,

| read: | ‘Deadline for registration: 22 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’; |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘Deadline for registration: 22 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time’;

on page 3:

| for: | ‘WHEN AND WHERE CAN I APPLY?

  Apply online on the EPSO website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu by:


  21 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.
  ’, |
| --- | --- |

for:

for:

‘WHEN AND WHERE CAN I APPLY?

Apply online on the EPSO website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu by:

21 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.
  ’,

| read: | ‘WHEN AND WHERE CAN I APPLY?

  Apply online on the EPSO website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu by:


  22 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.
  ’. |
| --- | --- |

read:

read:

‘WHEN AND WHERE CAN I APPLY?

Apply online on the EPSO website http://jobs.eu-careers.eu by:

22 April 2015 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time.
  ’.

---
Memphis MSA Ozone Monitors
# C_2015210EN.01000101.xml

| 26.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 210/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 210/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7353 — Airbus/Safran/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 210/01)

On 26 November 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7353. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7353. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Government-to Government Consultations

Date: July 18, 2014

Time: 9:00 – 3:30 pm (Mountain Time Zone)

Where: EPA Region 8 Office, Denver, CO

 Attendees: EPA R8 Tribes (CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY); 

EPA Region 8 Staff; EPA Headquarters Staff

Email notifications were sent to the Region 8 Tribes listed below and to Rollie Wilson, 

Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP – Attorney for MHA Nation (Three Affiliated Tribes). Rollie 

also forwarded the consultation notification to their list of “energy” tribes. 

Region 8 Tribes

1 Blackfeet Nation MT

2 Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe SD

3 Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes MT

4 Crow Creek Sioux Tribe SD

5 Crow Nation MT

6 Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe SD

7 Fort Belknap Reservation – Gros Ventre Tribe and Assiniboine Tribe MT

8 Fort Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes MT

9 Lower Brule Sioux Tribe SD

10 MHA Nation – Three Affiliated Tribes ND

11 Northern Cheyenne Tribe MT

12 Northwest Band of Shoshone Nation UT

13 Oglala Sioux Tribe SD

14 Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah UT

15 Rosebud Sioux Tribe SD

16 Sisseton Wahpeton Sioux SD/ND

17 Southern Ute Indian Tribe CO

18 Spirit Lake Tribe CO

19 Standing Rock Sioux Tribe ND

20 The Chippewa Cree Tribe MT

21 The Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa ND

22 Ute Indian Tribe UT

23 Ute Mountain Ute Tribe CO

24 Wind River Reservation – Northern Arapaho Tribe and Eastern Shoshone WY

25 Yankton Sioux Tribe SD
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March
      31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by LaserLock
      Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Normal
      A. Gardner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The
      Report fully complied with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





May
      15,
      2006





/s/
      Norman
      Gardner


Norman
      A.
      Gardner


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer





This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not , except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.





Explanatory
      Note: The same individual serves as chief executive (principal) officer and
      principal financial officer. Accordingly, there are no other individuals who
      are
“other certifying officers” referred to in this certification.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Osborn, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hudson's Grill International, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;

4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the quarter presented in this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

|Date:	November 15, 2004 | /s/David L. Osborn

[Signature]

President
|----------------------- | ------------------------------------------

f\sec\o01.040930
Exhibit 4.1


 


Advisors Asset Management, Inc.

18925 Base Camp Road

Monument, Colorado 80132


October 13, 2021


 


Advisors Disciplined Trust 2091


c/o The Bank of New York Mellon, as Trustee


240 Greenwich Street, 22W Floor


New York, NY 10286


 


Re: Advisors Disciplined Trust 2091 (the “Fund”)


Ladies and Gentlemen:


We have examined the Registration
Statement File No. 333-259194 for the above captioned Fund. We hereby consent to the use in the Registration Statement of the references
to Advisors Asset Management, Inc. as evaluator.


You are hereby authorized
to file a copy of this letter with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


 


	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 	 
	 	Advisors Asset Management, Inc.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By	/s/ ALEX R. MEITZNER
	 	 	Alex R. Meitzner
	 	 	Senior Vice President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00653-CV

Denise MUNOZ,

Appellant

v.

Joel SALINAS,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-14-325

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED November 23, 2016.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
-

r 

FORT SHAFTER 

REF ID:A488786 

n ;" (Frf':j /rt .rrr-· :\",, 1!'"'11/1 1 • . 1 '-· . I 1, .c Ii ; 

SPSIB-3 

Frank B. Rowlett, Lt. Colonel, S. C. 

23 APRIL 1945 

SOME DELAY OCCASIONED IN SEARCHING BACK FILES FOR INFO REQUESTED 

SID THREE ZERO FOUR PAREN CITE SPSIB DASH THREE FOR COLLINS FROM 

CORDERMAN PAREN ARL THREE ONE ONE FOUR FIVE ANSWERS SID TWO NINE 

TWO PD WILL FURNISH INFO WHEN LOCATED 

PLATTE 

30283 

\rl)·1·7' 

I \ \' \ l I Ii ( ', I ~ . • 

• i • : 

~· 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3
# C_2015073EN.01000101.xml

| 2.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 073/01)

Last publication

OJ C 65, 23.2.2015

Past publications

OJ C 56, 16.2.2015

OJ C 46, 9.2.2015

OJ C 34, 2.2.2015

OJ C 26, 26.1.2015

OJ C 16, 19.1.2015

OJ C 7, 12.1.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
UAVRG, LLC Mission Checklist

Customer Name Customer Email Customer Phone Number Flight Location Address Flight Plan Lat/Long Boundaries Nearest Airport

Mission Planning Yes No NA Comments Review Proposed Flight Area Review Airspace Constraints Review if flight path is within 5NM of Airport Designated under AFD Review if flight path is on or inside Instrument Approach Path Review Sunrise Sunset Times for designated flight area
Review NOTAMS Review Possible Obstructions Review UAVforecast.com Seven Day Forecast Review Terminal Area Forecast to Nearest Location Review KP Index Forecast Assignment of designated(VO) Visual Observer Review Proposed Flight Plan Review Flight Limitations Review of Flight Maintenance Logs Preflight Verification of All Firmware is update and test flown. Review Current Flight Plan
Review Current Notams Review Obstructions
Review Current WX Nearest Station Does Wind Exceed 20kts If Exceeds No Flight Does Ceiling Exceed 500' above flight plan height If Exceeds no Flight Does Visibility Exceed 3NM Flight will be at least 500' from nonparticipating person vessels vehicles and structures UAS Preflight Inspection Check UAS for visual signs of damage, if damage do not fly Ensure propellers are tightly fastened and not damaged Check propellers are in correct positions on motors Ensure that motors spinn freel and are not damaged Flight Controller Batter Exceed 90% Charge Flight Controller Range Extender Exceed 90% UAS System Battery Exceed 90% Flight Vision System Battery exceeds 90% Preflight Calibrations of Flight Controller Insert Battery into UAS Turn on Controller/Range Extender Connect Vision Device to UAS Wifi Establish Go Home Location Verify Min of Eight Satellites are seen by UAS Flight Announce Voice Clear Prop Start Engines of UAS Validate UAS Startup Increase Throttle to lift off Increase Power to apx 6'' Hover and establish X,Y,Z Movement in Controls Proceed Preplanned Flight Flight Plan Execution Monitor Flight Telemetry Return Flight to designated landing location Stop Engines Post Flight Inspection Inspect UAS for any abnormalities Downlink Data Remove Battery Turn off Flight Controller/Range Extender
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

# CERTIFICATION

# PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Guy Shafran, as Chief Financial Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)       
          the accompanying Form 20-F report for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
          with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |                                       
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Dated:  March 31, 2008 | By: /s/ Guy Shafran                   
|                       | Guy Shafran                           
|                       | Chief Financial Officer of the Company



---

---