alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE 

RICHARD J. MORGAN, 

Defendant BelowAppellant, 

v. 

STATE OF DELAWARE, 

Plaintiff BelowAppellee. 

§ 

§ No. 509, 2016 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ Court Below—Superior Court 

§ of the State of Delaware 

§ 

§ Cr. ID 1003022700 

§ 

§ 

 Submitted: October 21, 2016 

 Decided: November 21, 2016 

Before STRINE, Chief Justice; VAUGHN, and SEITZ, Justices 

ORDER

 This 21st day of November 2016, after careful consideration of the 

appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to affirm, and the record on 

appeal, the Court concludes that the September 20, 2016 order of the 

Superior Court dismissing the appellant’s second motion for postconviction 

relief should be affirmed. The motion was subject to summary dismissal 

because it was the appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief 

following his 2011 guilty plea.1

 

 

1

 Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(d)(2) (2016) (emphasis supplied) (providing that a second or 

subsequent motion for postconviction relief shall be summarily dismissed unless the 

movant was convicted after trial and pleads with particularity a claim that the movant is 

actually innocent or a claim that a new rule of constitutional law is retroactively 

applicable and renders the conviction invalid). 
2

 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the 

Superior Court is AFFIRMED. 

 BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr.

 Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         365,175
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                              301,953,113
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             302,318,288
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,324,803
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 15,000,000
<COMMON>                                           100
<OTHER-SE>                                 284,993,385
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               299,993,485
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,943,288
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   91,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,273,641
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                578,234
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            578,234
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   578,234
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 5,782.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2732 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain conduct relating 

to the use of horses for human consumption. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021 

Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit certain 

conduct relating to the use of horses for human consumption. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘John Stringer Rainey 

5 Save America’s Forgotten Equines Act’’ or the ‘‘John 

6 Stringer Rainey SAFE Act’’. 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2732 IS

1 SEC. 2. SLAUGHTER OF HORSES FOR HUMAN CONSUMP2 TION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 3 of title 18, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘§ 50. Slaughter of horses for human consumption 

7 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—It shall be unlawful to knowingly— 

8 ‘‘(1) possess, ship, transport, purchase, sell, de9 liver, or receive, in or affecting interstate or foreign 

10 commerce, any horse with the intent that it is to be 

11 slaughtered for human consumption; or 

12 ‘‘(2) possess, ship, transport, purchase, sell, de13 liver, or receive, in or affecting interstate or foreign 

14 commerce, any horse flesh or carcass or part of a 

15 carcass, with the intent that it is to be used for 

16 human consumption. 

17 ‘‘(b) PENALTY.—Any person who violates subsection 

18 (a)— 

19 ‘‘(1) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned 

20 not more than 2 years, or both; or 

21 ‘‘(2) in the case of a covered offense, shall be 

22 fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 1 

23 year, or both. 

24 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

25 ‘‘(1) the term ‘covered offense’ means a viola26 tion of subsection (a) in which— 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2732 IS

1 ‘‘(A) the defendant has no prior conviction 

2 under this section; and 

3 ‘‘(B) the conduct involves fewer than 5 

4 horses or fewer than 2,000 pounds of horse 

5 flesh or carcass or part of a carcass; and 

6 ‘‘(2) the term ‘horse’ means any member of the 

7 family Equidae.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 for chapter 3 of title 18, United States Code, is amended 

10 by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘50. Slaughter of horses for human consumption.’’. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK120RN23PROD with BILLS
07/25/2011 14:18 FAX ~14 447 3747 CA~ CS ~003/003

A division of the American Chemical $ocle~ 

# Expert Service Phone: 800-631-1884, 61,H47-3870

Fax: 61,4-447-3747 E-mall: ~s’v, en@cas.org W,~b: w,~w, ce, s,o rg/pro du cu/dlen t/ 

### INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE RE~0RT 

### ~ES-ORDER NUMBER: 179062

CAS 2540 Olente, r~ PC, er Road P.O. Box 3~43 Columbus. Ohio 43210-0334 USA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TRAVIS ELLIOT DARROW,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 415 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

TSAT Technologies, Inc., a Colorado Corporation doing business under the name
TSAT Technologies, Inc.

TSAT Holding 1, Inc., a Delaware Corporation doing business under the name
TSAT Holding 1, Inc.

TSAT Holding 2, Inc., a Delaware Corporation doing business under the name
TSAT Holding 2, Inc.

Liberty Satellite, LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation doing
business under the name Liberty Satellite, LLC

LSAT Astro LLC, a Delaware limited liability corporation doing
business under the name LSAT Astro LLC

Tempo Satellite, Inc., an Oklahoma corporatoin doing business under the name
Tempo Satellite, Inc.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6574

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JONATHAN TREWAYNE CLANTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Danville. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (4:05-cr-00031-JLK)

Submitted: April 28, 2009 Decided: May 13, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jonathan Trewayne Clanton, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Andrew Bassford, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Jonathan Trewayne Clanton appeals the district court’s

order granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v.

Clanton , No. 4:05-cr-00031-JLK (W.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2008). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2794 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase automatic 

maximum coverage under the Servicemembers’ Group 

Life Insurance program and the Veterans’ Group Life 

Insurance program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2794 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting Families 

3 of the Fallen Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN AUTOMATIC MAXIMUM COVERAGE 

5 UNDER SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP LIFE IN6 SURANCE AND VETERANS’ GROUP LIFE IN7 SURANCE. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1967(a)(3)(A)(i) of title 

9 38, United States Code, is amended by striking 

10 ‘‘$400,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$500,000’’. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

12 subsection (a) shall take effect on the later of— 

13 (1) the date that is 60 days after the date of 

14 the enactment of this Act; or 

15 (2) the date on which the Secretary of Veterans 

16 Affairs determines that— 

17 (A) the amount for which a member will be 

18 insured pursuant to the amendment made by 

19 subsection (a) and the premiums for such 

20 amount are administratively and actuarially 

21 sound for the Servicemembers’ Group Life In22 surance program under subchapter III of chap23 ter 19 of title 38, United States Code, and the 

24 Veterans’ Group Life Insurance program under 

25 section 1977 of such title; and 
3 

†S 2794 ES

1 (B) the increase in such amount carried 

2 out pursuant to the amendment will not result 

3 in such programs operating at a loss. 

Passed the Senate March 23, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2794 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase 

gram, and for other purposes. and the Veterans’ Group Life Insurance proServicemembers’ Group Life Insurance program automatic maximum coverage under the
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2442 

To amend section 455(m) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 in order 

to allow adjunct faculty members to qualify for public service loan forgiveness. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2021 

Mr. DURBIN (for himself, Ms. DUCKWORTH, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. BOOKER) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend section 455(m) of the Higher Education Act of 

1965 in order to allow adjunct faculty members to qualify for public service loan forgiveness. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adjunct Faculty Loan 

5 Fairness Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR ADJUNCT FACULTY. 

7 Section 455(m)(3)(B)(ii) of the Higher Education 

8 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(3)(B)(ii)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2442 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘teaching as’’ and inserting the 

2 following: ‘‘teaching— 

3 ‘‘(I) as’’; 

4 (2) by striking ‘‘, foreign language faculty, and 

5 part-time faculty at community colleges), as deter6 mined by the Secretary.’’ and inserting ‘‘and foreign 

7 language faculty), as determined by the Secretary; 

8 or’’; and 

9 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(II) as a part-time faculty mem11 ber or instructor who— 

12 ‘‘(aa) teaches not less than 

13 1 course at an institution of 

14 higher education (as defined in 

15 section 101(a)), a postsecondary 

16 vocational institution (as defined 

17 in section 102(c)), or a Tribal 

18 College or University (as defined 

19 in section 316(b)); and 

20 ‘‘(bb) is not employed on a 

21 full-time basis by any other em22 ployer.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
BRANDON WARNER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1113

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 6, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Steven Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, L. 

Allen Beard, Assistant Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Thomas Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, 

and Tayo Popoola, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10
- 23
- 00002
- CR No. 10
- 23
- 00005
- CR EX PARTE CEDRIC DEON CLARK

From the 413th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. F48586 Trial Court No. F - 201900014
Original Proceeding s
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On January 4, 2023, Cedric Deon Clark filed what appears to be original habeas corpus proceedings seeking to have this Court issue writs of habeas corpus and “release [him] from unlawful confinement ” and “cease and desist” “ violations of [his] Constitutional Amendments.” This Court, however, has no jurisdiction over these original applications for writ of habeas corp us. See T EX
. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN
. § 22.221; T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. A NN
. art. 11.05 ; see also Ex parte Gambrell , Nos. 10

- 22

- 00004

- CR & 10

- 22

-Ex parte Clark Page 2

00005

- CR, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 372, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Waco Jan. 19, 2022, orig. proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing original applications for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction). Accordingly, we dismiss these proceedings for want of jurisdiction.

STEVE SMITH Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith Dismissed Opinion delivered and filed January 11, 2023 Do not publish [ OT06 ]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SOHU.COM
FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          70,061
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,813
<ALLOWANCES>                                       144
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                74,756
<PP&E>                                           5,306
<DEPRECIATION>                                     800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  81,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,064
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      97,309
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    81,108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,602
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,023
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,259)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,259)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.13)


</TABLE>
## PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS TEC HNICAL SUPPORT DOCUM ENT

(TSD): ENERGY EFFICIENCY ST ANDARDS FOR AUTOMATIC

COMMERCIAL ICE MAKERS

January 20, 2012

U.S. Depar tment of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.,

and

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                          43,543
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  887,089
<ALLOWANCES>                                   167,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,301,735
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,400,484
<PP&E>                                       1,386,215
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,260,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,807,062
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,446,273
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,199
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,807,062
<SALES>                                      7,492,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,547,371
<CGS>                                        4,850,002
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,850,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,425,396
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             198,801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                223,099
<INCOME-TAX>                                   103,700
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            119,399
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   119,399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015347EN.01000101.xml

| 20.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7769 — Gilde Fund IV/Parcom Fund IV/Koninklijke Ten Cate)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 347/01)

On 8 October 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7769. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7769. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016200EN.01000101.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 200/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 191, 30.5.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 175, 17.5.2016

OJ C 165, 10.5.2016

OJ C 156, 2.5.2016

OJ C 145, 25.4.2016

OJ C 136, 18.4.2016

OJ C 118, 4.4.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**Exhibit 24.8**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E.Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher Kirk and eachof them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitutionand resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and to sign any or allamendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto,and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with orwithout the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and everyact and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, asfully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or theirsubstitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

 
|   | /s/  JEFFREY M. HELLER |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | Jeffrey  M. Heller     |

 

----