alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.44





 Exhibit 10.44 

CMTG DB Finance LLC 
 c/o Mack Real
Estate Credit Strategies 
 60 Columbus Circle, 20th Floor 

New York, New York 10023 

May 7, 2020 
 Deutsche
Bank AG, Cayman Islands Branch 
 60 Wall Street 
 New York, New
York 10005 
 Attention: Tom Rugg 
  

	 	RE:	 Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2019 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise
modified and in effect from time to time, the “Master Repurchase Agreement”) by and between Deutsche Bank AG, Cayman Islands Branch as Buyer (“Buyer”) and CMTG DB Finance LLC as Master Seller (“Master
Seller”) and Letter Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2019 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Letter Agreement”) by and between Buyer and Master Seller



 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is hereby made to the Master Repurchase Agreement and the Letter Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Master Repurchase Agreement, or if not defined therein, then such terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Letter Agreement. 

Pursuant to Section 3(a)(i) of the Letter Agreement, Master Seller hereby gives Buyer notice of its exercise of an Extension Option to
extend the current Facility Termination Date of the Original Repurchase Date to the First Extended Repurchase Date. 
  

					
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 CMTG DB Finance LLC

		
	 By:  
	 	 /s/ J. Michael McGillis

		 	 Name: J. Michael McGillis

		 	 Title: Authorized
Signatory



  

			
	 CC:
	  	 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

		  	 One World Financial Center

		  	 200 Liberty Street

		  	 New York, New York 10281

		  	 Attention: Y. Jeffrey Rotblat, Esq.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6373

HAROLD WATTS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Bruce H. Hendricks, District Judge. (2:16-cv-02954-BHH)

Submitted: August 28, 2018 Decided: October 5, 2018

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harold Watts, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Harold Watts seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 

(2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Watts has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

3/31/2015 COA No. 01-13-00851-CR

GUANCHE, ERIK SANTANA Tr. Ct. No. 1869024 PD-0190-15

The Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The

Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this office within three (3)

days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in the refusal of the

petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

1ST COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

301 FANNIN

HOUSTON, TX 77002-7006

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

FILE COPY
-~- ,. __ -·~-------::;::,.----------. 

• REF ID:A71749 

• "" r_ i;,, .. \ ......... \ ... A I 

18 Octobe:r 1951 

Dear .rohn: 

Please comre;r mr thanks to Eric Jones for his 

courtesy in tarnishing the inrormation contained in 

::XJC/1971. I thank 70\l for getting the intomat.ion 

from him. 

Sincerel.7, 

Brig. lT. tt. Tilt.man 

Pritish Joint services l'ission 

rain ~~av Building 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 03-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit (11) -- Statement re: computation of per share earnings
Year Ended December 31,

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

<S> <C>                                                                                               1997                1996
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basic Earnings Per Share:
   Net income available to stockholders                                                   $ 1,829,989         $ 1,533,934
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Weighted average shares outstanding                                                      1,006,643             944,333
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

   Basic earnings per outstanding shares                                                         1.82                1.62
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Diluted Earnings Per Share:
   Weighted average shares outstanding                                                    $ 1,006,643          $  944,333
   Nonemployees directors' stock option                                                        17,727              16,813
   Employee incentive stock option                                                             16,081              14,340
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Total weighted average shares outstanding                                              1,040,451             975,486
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Diluted earnings per outstanding share                                                           1.76                 1.57
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

</TABLE>
# C_2016297EN.01000801.xml

| 17.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/8

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.7932 — Dow/DuPont)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 297/07)

On 11 August 2016, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7932 — Dow/DuPont, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 21, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40221

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE SANTOS DE LEON-ROCHA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-03-CR-765-ALL

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Santos De Leon-Rocha appeals from his guilty-plea

conviction for possession with intent to distribute in excess of

50 kilograms of marijuana. De Leon contends for the first time

on appeal that 21 U.S.C. § 841(a) and (b) are facially

unconstitutional in view of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466

(2000). He acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580 (5th Cir. 2000), but he

seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 
No. 04-40221

-2-

In Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 490, the Supreme Court held that

“[o]ther than the fact of a prior conviction, any fact that

increases the penalty for a crime beyond the prescribed statutory

maximum must be submitted to a jury, and proved beyond a

reasonable doubt.” This court has rejected the argument that

Apprendi rendered the sentencing provisions of 21 U.S.C. § 841

facially unconstitutional. See Slaughter, 238 F.3d at 582. As

De Leon concedes, the court’s opinion in Slaughter forecloses his

argument. See id.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME & DATE:

 2:00 p.m., Monday, March 23, 2015.

# PLACE:

 NeighborWorks America—Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

# STATUS:

 Open (with the exception of Executive Session).

# CONTACT PERSON:

                         Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-4101;                         *jbryson@nw.org.*

# AGENDA:

I. CALL TO ORDER

II. Executive Session: Management Update

III. Audio Visual Contract Decision

IV. Training Tool Restart

V. Sustainable Homeownership

VI. FY16 Federal Budget

VII. Management Updates

VIII. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson,

EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-06281 Filed 3-16-15; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7570-02-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEMOH A. ROGERS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 418 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
null

42.42486
#### The State ex rel. Reynolds, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Reynolds v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 591.]

(No. 98-2599

Submitted July 28, 1999

Decided September 22, 1999.)

*Conner & Behai, L.L.P., Daniel D. Connor*and *Kenneth S. Hafenstein,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *William D. Haders,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

*592Moyer, C.J., Resnicic, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., dissents.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents and would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

2:00 p.m., Monday, March 30, 2015.

# PLACE:

NeighborWorks America—Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

# STATUS:

Open (with the exception of Executive Session).

# CONTACT PERSON:

                        Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-4101;                         *jbryson@nw.org*.                    

# AGENDA:

I. CALL TO ORDER

II. Approval of Minutes

III. Executive Session: Report from CEO

IV. Executive Session: Compensation Review

V. Audio Visual Contract Decision

VI. Sustainable Homeownership Evaluation

VII. Restart Training IT Project Development

VIII. Financial Report

IX. Management Updates

X. Adjournment

Jeffrey T. Bryson, 

EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-06901 Filed 3-23-15; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7570-01-P
[LOGO OMITTED]    BDO Dunwoody LLP                 600 Park Place
                  Chartered Accountants            666 Burrard Street
                                                   Vancouver, BC, Canada V6C 2X8
                                                   Telephone:  (604) 688-5421
                                                   Telefax:  (604) 688-5132
                                                   E-mail:  vancouver@bdo.ca
                                                   www.bdo.ca




================================================================================

                                              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.
Carpinteria, California


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the:

1.    Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on May 10, 2002 (Registration No. 333-88064) with respect to
      the registration of 2,731,000 shares of common stock of Turbodyne
      Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") issued as stock for service to certain
      of the Company's consultants named in the Registration Statement;

2.    Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on October 2, 2002 (Registration No. 333-100245) with respect
      to the registration of 6,000,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant
      to the Company's 2002 Stock Option Plan;

3.    Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on December 19, 2002 (Registration No. 333-101977) with respect
      to the registration of 7,500,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant
      to the Company's 2002 Stock Incentive Plan; and

4.    Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on August 14, 2003 (Registration No. 333-107995) with respect
      to the registration of 3,000,000 shares of common stock issuable pursuant
      to the Company's 2003 Stock Incentive Plan;

of our report dated April 6, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial
statements of the Company as of December 31, 2003 which appears in this Form
10-KSB. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's
ability to continue as a going concern.



/s/ BDO Dunwoody LLP
----------------------
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
July 6, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06355]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice to All Interested Parties of the Termination of the 
Receivership of 10364, Coastal Bank, Cocoa Beach, Florida

    Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (``FDIC'') as Receiver for Coastal Bank, Cocoa Beach, 
Florida (``the Receiver'') intends to terminate its receivership for 
said institution. The FDIC was appointed receiver of Coastal Bank on 
May 6, 2011. The liquidation of the receivership assets has been 
completed. To the extent permitted by available funds and in accordance 
with law, the Receiver will be making a final dividend payment to 
proven creditors.
    Based upon the foregoing, the Receiver has determined that the 
continued existence of the receivership will serve no useful purpose. 
Consequently, notice is given that the receivership shall be 
terminated, to be effective no sooner than thirty days after the date 
of this Notice. If any person wishes to comment concerning the 
termination of the receivership, such comment must be made in writing 
and sent within thirty days of the date of this Notice to: Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation, Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, Attention: Receivership Oversight Department 32.1, 1601 
Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201.
    No comments concerning the termination of this receivership will be 
considered which are not sent within this time frame.

    Dated: March 16, 2015.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06355 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 30, 2016

No. 04-16-00482-CV

CLEARWATER RANCH PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellant

v.

Adrianna ROHLMEIER,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI16454

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was originally due on September 1, 2016. On September 2, 2016, 

the clerk of this court notified the court reporter, Luis Duran, Jr., that he is the court reporter 

responsible for timely filing the reporter’s record in this appeal and that the reporter’s record was

late. The clerk explained Mr. Duran must file the reporter’s record within thirty days. Mr. Duran

did not file the reporter’s record or a notification of late record within thirty days. This court 

then ordered Mr. Duran to file the reporter’s record no later than November 7, 2016. On 

November 7, 2016, Mr. Duran filed a notice of late record, requesting until November 21, 2106 

to file the reporter’s record. This court granted Mr. Duran’s request, but noted further extensions 

would be disfavored. On November 21, 2016, this court received a notice of late record from 

Mr. Duran, requesting additional time, until December 5, 2016.

This court GRANTS Luis Duran, Jr.’s notification of late reporter’s record. This court 

ORDERS Luis Duran, Jr. to file the reporter’s record no later than December 5, 2016. If the 

reporter’s record is not received by such date, an order may be issued directing Mr. Duran to 

appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to file the record.

The clerk of this court shall cause a copy of this order to be served on Mr. Duran by 

certified mail, return receipt requested, or give other personal notice of this order with proof of 

delivery. Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts are jointly responsible for ensuring that the 

appellate record is timely filed,” TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c), the clerk of the court is directed to serve 

a copy of this order on the Honorable David Canales, Judge of the 73rd Judicial District Court.
_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
SAYTON ADAIR WALLER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2999

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 15, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela Cox, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Courtenay H. Miller, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., WETHERELL and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Tanir Horn, as Chief Financial Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


Date: December 20, 2011
By:
/s/ Tanir HornTanir HornChief Financial Officer of the Company
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JEFFREY PETER KOKOCHA,

Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-784

February 7, 2024

Appeal from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission.

Jeffrey Peter Kokocha, pro se.

Amanda L. Neff, Deputy General Counsel, and Katie E. Sabo, Appellate 

Counsel, Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, Tallahassee, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SLEET, C.J., and LaROSE and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.