alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2011- Directorate Identifier: 2011-NE-21-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update 

accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspect Engines: 

IO-720-A1B,

SNs L-1457-54A 

and L-1458-54A

both engines are 

currently on aircraft 

N51779

1.0 $ 85.00 $0 $ 85.00 2 $ 170.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 170

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs: 

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product
$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated 

Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):

Engine inspection and repair to be accomplished by original overhaul facility at no cost to 

owner.

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain

for either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: There are only 2 engines to be inspected by a representative of the facility that 

overhauled the engines. This will be done at no cost to the owner.

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements 

for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER
30, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             117
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (136)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,549
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,355
<PP&E>                                           4,111
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,844)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,446
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           305
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,458
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,209
<SALES>                                          5,697
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,697
<CGS>                                            2,945
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 145
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    244
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                244
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       244
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
Sanitized Processing Consolidated Chemical Substance 1: 

Manufacture of Pre-Impregnated Substrate
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2573 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2573

 To amend title 49, United States Code, to maintain the classification 
          of certain airports for fiscal years 2022 and 2023.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2021

  Mr. Daines introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 49, United States Code, to maintain the classification 
          of certain airports for fiscal years 2022 and 2023.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Airport Classification Retention 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MAINTENANCE OF CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN AIRPORTS FOR FISCAL 
              YEARS 2022 AND 2023.

    (a) In General.--Section 47114(c)(1) of title 49, United States 
Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(K) Special rule on classification for fiscal 
                years 2022 and 2023.--Notwithstanding section 47102 and 
                subparagraph (A), and subject to subparagraph (J), for 
                fiscal years 2022 and 2023, the Secretary shall 
                classify an airport as a primary nonhub airport if that 
                airport was a primary nonhub airport for fiscal year 
                2021.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of division L of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116-260).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2015333EN.01000201.xml

| 9.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 333/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 333/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 October 2015

(2015/C 333/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1254 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,92 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4611 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73660 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2790 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0935 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2185 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,117 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,17 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2321 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4162 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3012 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5664 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4683 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7220 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7050 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5890 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 305,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1556 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1507 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6135 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 619,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7500 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,923 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,3304 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,500 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3574 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6929 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,2592 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1254

JPY

Japanese yen

134,92

DKK

Danish krone

7,4611

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73660

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2790

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0935

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2185

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,117

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,17

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2321

RON

Romanian leu

4,4162

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3012

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5664

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4683

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7220

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7050

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5890

KRW

South Korean won

1 305,49

ZAR

South African rand

15,1556

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1507

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6135

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 619,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7500

PHP

Philippine peso

51,923

RUB

Russian rouble

70,3304

THB

Thai baht

40,500

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3574

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6929

INR

Indian rupee

73,2592

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015430EN.01000601.xml

| 22.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 430/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 430/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 December 2015

(2015/C 430/08)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0870 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,93 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72985 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2930 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0804 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5585 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,028 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,15 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2402 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5115 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1643 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5168 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5169 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4247 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6114 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5307 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 280,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4115 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0457 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6505 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 015,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6679 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,388 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,4488 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,262 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3219 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6067 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,0850 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0870

JPY

Japanese yen

131,93

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72985

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2930

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0804

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5585

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,028

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,15

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2402

RON

Romanian leu

4,5115

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1643

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5168

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5169

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4247

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6114

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5307

KRW

South Korean won

1 280,05

ZAR

South African rand

16,4115

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0457

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6505

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 015,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6679

PHP

Philippine peso

51,388

RUB

Russian rouble

77,4488

THB

Thai baht

39,262

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3219

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6067

INR

Indian rupee

72,0850

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
11 TH C OURT OF A PPEALS

E ASTLAND
, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

In the interest of J.H. and * From the 244th District D.H., children, Court of Ector County, Trial Court No. C

- 3365

- PC

.

No. 11

- 14

- 00361

- CV * June 18, 2015

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion (P anel consists of: Wright, C.J., Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the appeal

should be dismissed. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the appeal

is dismissed.
Information Collection 

Activity

Engineer 

$79.76/hr

Manager 

$116.03/hr

Clerical 

$35.78/hr

Respond

ents 

hr/yr

Labor 

Cost/yr

Capital 

Startup 

Cost

O&M Cost (3) Frequency Number of 

Engine 

Families

Total 

Hours/yr

Total 

Cost/yr

Review of regulations 

and guidance documents 2 3 0 5 $508 $0.00 $0 1 1 5 $508

Training 7 0 0 7 $585 $0.00 $0 1 1 7 $585

PCA Arrangements 10 8 0 18 $1,726 $0.00 $0 1 4 72 $6,903

Service Accumulation 10 1 0 11 $914 $0.00 $17,300 1 2 22 $36,427

Conduct PCA (2) 16 7 10 32 $2,356 $0.00 $576 4 2 254 $23,457

Engine Reallocation 4 0 0 4 $319 $0.00 $4 4 2 32 $2,584

PCA Report 10 10 5 25 $2,137 $0.00 $2 1 2 50 $4,278

Quarterly Reports 2 2 2 6 $428 $0.00 $2 4 2 44 $3,438

Prepare Carry-Over 

NCPs 1 0 0 1 $80 $0.00 $2 1 2 2 $164

Maintain Records 5 0 8 13 $685 $0.00 $20 4 1 52 $2,820

Sub Total 66 31 25 122 $9,736 $0.00 $17,906 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Total for Industry: N/A N/A N/A 541 $41,819 $0.00 $39,344 varies 4 541 $81,163

Per response (4) N/A N/A N/A 22.54 $1,742 $0.00 $1,639 N/A N/A N/A N/A

(1)Respondents (hr/yr) includes total hours for one respondents with 4 engine families.

(2) Annualized since testing and information is carried over in following years.

(3) Annualized and adjusted for inflation

(4) Total of responses (24)= 1 PCA notification+1 PCA report + 4 quarterly reports per engine family for 4 engine families

NCP Total Estimated Respondent Burden and Cost (1)

Table E
Information 

Collection 

Activity

Engineer 

$71.44/hr

Manager 

$84.42 Hours/yr

Labor 

Cost/yr

Capital 

Startup 

Cost O&M Cost

Engine 

Families

Total 

Hr/yr

Total 

Cost/yr

Review Regulations 4 1 5 $370 $0.00 $0 1 5 $370

Application Review 5 2 7 $526 $0.00 $10 4 28 $2,144

PCA Review & 

Compliance Level 

Determination 10 6 16 $1,221 $0.00 $2 4 64 $4,892

Quarterly Report & Fee 

Payment Review 4 1 5 $370 $0.00 $2 4 20 $1,489

Total per Engine 

Family 23 10 33 $2,487 $0.00 $14 N/A N/A N/A

Total for Agency N/A N/A N/A $8,839 $0.00 $56 4 117 $8,895

Total Estimated Agency Burden and Cost Summary

Table F
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,623

EX PARTE AGUSTIN MORA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. F07-72699-QU IN THE 291st DISTRICT COURT

FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated

assault and sentenced to fifteen years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he

failed to timely file a notice of appeal. 

The trial court has determined, based upon the record, that trial counsel failed to timely file

a notice of appeal. We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-
2

time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No. F07-72699-QU from the 291st Judicial

District Court of Dallas County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a

written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. 

Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether Applicant is

indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall

immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall be

calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. 

We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file

a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

The Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed.

Delivered: September 14, 2011

Do Not Publish
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO acting by and 

through City Public Service Board a/k/a 

CPS ENERGY,

 Appellant,

v.

PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF 

TEXAS, 

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-14-00199-CV

Appeal from the

261st District Court

 of Travis County, Texas

 (TC# D-1-GV-13-000988)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellant all costs, both in this Court and the court below. This decision shall be 

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016.

STEVEN L. HUGHES, Justice

Before Rodriguez, J., Hughes, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
UAVRG, LLC Mission Checklist 

Customer Name

Customer Email

Customer Phone Number 

Flight Location Address

Flight Plan Lat/Long Boundaries 

Nearest Airport 

Mission Planning Yes No NA Comments

Review Proposed Flight Area 

Review Airspace Constraints

Review if flight path is within 5NM of Airport Designated under AFD 

Review if flight path is on or inside Instrument Approach Path 

Review Sunrise Sunset Times for designated flight area

Review NOTAMS 

Review Possible Obstructions

Review UAVforecast.com Seven Day Forecast 

Review Terminal Area Forecast to Nearest Location

Review KP Index Forecast 

Assignment of designated(VO) Visual Observer 

Review Proposed Flight Plan 

Review Flight Limitations 

Review of Flight Maintenance Logs 

Preflight

Verification of All Firmware is update and test flown. 

Review Current Flight Plan 

Review Current Notams 

Review Obstructions 

Review Current WX Nearest Station 

Does Wind Exceed 20kts If Exceeds No Flight 

Does Ceiling Exceed 500' above flight plan height If Exceeds no Flight 

Does Visibility Exceed 3NM

Flight will be at least 500' from nonparticipating person vessels vehicles and structures 

UAS Preflight Inspection 

Check UAS for visual signs of damage, if damage do not fly

Ensure propellers are tightly fastened and not damaged

Check propellers are in correct positions on motors 

Ensure that motors spinn freel and are not damaged 

Flight Controller Batter Exceed 90% Charge 

Flight Controller Range Extender Exceed 90%

UAS System Battery Exceed 90%

Flight Vision System Battery exceeds 90%

Preflight Calibrations of Flight Controller 

Insert Battery into UAS 

Turn on Controller/Range Extender 

Connect Vision Device to UAS Wifi

Establish Go Home Location 

Verify Min of Eight Satellites are seen by UAS

Flight 

Announce Voice Clear Prop

Start Engines of UAS

Validate UAS Startup 

Increase Throttle to lift off 

Increase Power to apx 6'' Hover and establish X,Y,Z Movement in Controls 

Proceed Preplanned Flight 

Flight Plan Execution 

Monitor Flight Telemetry 

Return Flight to designated landing location 

Stop Engines 

Post Flight Inspection 

Inspect UAS for any abnormalities 

Downlink Data 

Remove Battery

Turn off Flight Controller/Range Extender
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2255 

AN ACT 

To extend the trade adjustment assistance program for one 

month. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2255 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Trade Adjustment As3 sistance Extension Act of 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE 

5 PROGRAM. 

6 (a) EXTENSION OF TERMINATION PROVISIONS.— 

7 Section 285 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2271 

8 note) is amended by striking ‘‘June 30, 2021’’ each place 

9 it appears and inserting ‘‘July 23, 2021’’. 

10 (b) REEMPLOYMENT TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSIST11 ANCE.—Section 246(b)(1) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 

12 U.S.C. 2318(b)(1)) is amended by striking ‘‘June 30, 

13 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘July 23, 2021’’. 

14 (c) TRADE ADJUSTMENT ASSISTANCE FOR WORK15 ERS.—Section 245(a) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 

16 2317(a)) is amended by striking ‘‘June 30, 2021’’ and in17 serting ‘‘July 23, 2021’’. 

18 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section take effect on the earlier of— 

20 (1) the date of the enactment of this Act; or 

21 (2) June 30, 2021. 

22 (e) APPLICATION OF PRIOR LAW.—Section 406 of 

23 the Trade Adjustment Assistance Reauthorization Act of 

24 2015 (title IV of Public Law 114–27; 129 Stat. 379; 19 

25 U.S.C. 2271 note prec.) is amended— 

26 (1) in subsection (a)— 
3 

†S 2255 ES

1 (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), 

2 by striking ‘‘July 1, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘July 

3 24, 2021’’; and 

4 (B) in paragraphs (5) and (6), by striking 

5 ‘‘the 1-year period beginning on July 1, 2021’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘the period beginning on July 24, 

7 2021, and ending on June 30, 2022’’; and 

8 (2) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘July 1, 

9 2021’’ each place it appears and inserting ‘‘July 24, 

10 2021’’. 

Passed the Senate June 24, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2255 

AN ACT 

To extend the trade adjustment assistance program 

for one month.