Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Notices 12163 

1 ‘‘We,’’ ‘‘us,’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the 

environmental staff of the Commission’s Office of 

Energy Projects. 

have an average annual generation of 

421 gigawatt-hours (GWh). The average 

pumping power used by the project 

would be 554 GWh. 

o. A copy of the application is 

available for review at the Commission 

in the Public Reference Room or may be 

viewed on the Commission’s Web site at 

http://www.ferc.gov using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket 

number excluding the last three digits in 

the docket number field to access the 

document. For assistance, contact FERC 

Online Support. A copy is also available 

for inspection and reproduction at the 

address in item h above. 

You may also register online at http:// 

www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/

esubscription.asp to be notified via 

email of new filings and issuances 

related to this or other pending projects. 

For assistance, contact FERC Online 

Support. 

p. Procedural schedule: The 

application will be processed according 

to the following preliminary Hydro 

Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the 

schedule will be made as appropriate. 

Issue Notice of Acceptance or 

Deficiency April 2015 

Request Additional Information April 

2015 

Issue Acceptance Letter July 2015 

Issue Scoping Document 1 for 

comments August 2015 

Comments on Scoping Document 1

September 2015 

Issue Scoping Document 2 October 

2015 

Issue notice of ready for environmental 

analysis October 2015 

Commission issues EA, draft EA, or 

draft EIS April 2016 

Comments on EA, draft EA, or draft EIS

June 2016 

Commission issues final EA or final EIS

August 2016 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05251 Filed 3–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket Nos. PF15–5–000; PF15–6–000] 

Dominion Transmission, Inc., Atlantic 

Coast Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Intent 

To Prepare an Environmental Impact 

Statement for the Planned Supply 

Header Project and Atlantic Coast 

Pipeline Project, Request for 

Comments on Environmental Issues, 

and Notice of Public Scoping Meetings 

The staff of the Federal Energy 

Regulatory Commission (FERC or 

Commission) will prepare an 

environmental impact statement (EIS) 

that will discuss the environmental 

impacts of the Supply Header Project 

(SHP) involving construction and 

operation of facilities by Dominion 

Transmission, Inc. (Dominion) in 

Pennsylvania and West Virginia, and 

the Atlantic Coast Pipeline Project (ACP 

Project) involving construction and 

operation of facilities by Atlantic Coast 

Pipeline, LLC (Atlantic) in West 

Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. 

The environmental impacts of both 

projects will be considered in one EIS, 

which will be used by the Commission 

in its decision-making process to 

determine whether the projects are in 

the public convenience and necessity. 

This notice announces the opening of 

the scoping process the Commission 

will use to gather input from the public 

and interested agencies on the projects. 

Your input will help the Commission 

staff determine what issues they need to 

evaluate in the EIS. Please note that the 

scoping period will close on April 28, 

2015. 

You may submit comments in written 

form or verbally. Further details on how 

to submit written comments are in the 

Public Participation section of this 

notice. If you sent comments on the SHP 

or ACP Projects to the Commission 

before the opening of the dockets on 

October 31, 2014, you will need to file 

those comments under Docket No. 

PF15–5–000 or PF15–6–000 to ensure 

they are considered as part of this 

proceeding. In lieu of or in addition to 

sending written comments, the 

Commission invites you to attend any of 

the public scoping meetings scheduled 

as follows: 

Date and time Location 

Monday, March 9, 

2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Pine Forest High 

School, 525 Andrews Road, Fayetteville, NC 

28311. 

Date and time Location 

Tuesday, March 10, 

2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Forest Hills Middle 

School, 1210 Forest Hills Road, Wilson, NC 27896. 

Wednesday, March 

11, 2015, 7:00 p.m. 

William R. Davie Middle School, 4391 

Hwy. 158, Roanoke Rapids, NC 

27870. 

Thursday, March 12, 

2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Jolliff Middle School, 

1021 Jolliff Road, 

Chesapeake, VA 

23331. 

Monday, March 16, 

2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Dinwiddie Middle 

School, 11608 

Courthouse Road, 

Dinwiddie, VA 

23841. 

Tuesday, March 17, 

2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Prince Edward County High School Auditorium, 1482 Zion 

Hill Road, 

Farmville, VA 

23901. 

Wednesday, March 

18, 2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Nelson County Middle School, 6925 

Thomas Nelson 

Highway, 

Lovingston, VA 

22949. 

Thursday, March 19, 

2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Stuarts Draft High 

School, 1028 Augusta Farms Road, 

Stuarts Draft, VA 

24477. 

Monday, March 23, 

2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Elkins High School, 

100 Kennedy 

Drive, Elkins, WV 

26241. 

Tuesday, March 24, 

2015, 7:00 p.m. 

Bridgeport High 

School, 515 Johnson Avenue, 

Bridgeport, WV 

26330. 

The purpose of these scoping 

meetings is to provide an opportunity to 

verbally comment on the projects. If a 

significant number of people are 

interested in commenting at the 

meetings, we 1 may establish a 3- to 5- 

minute time limit for each commentor 

to ensure that all people wishing to 

comment have the opportunity in the 

time allotted for the meeting. If time 

limits on comments are implemented, 

they will be strictly enforced. A 

transcript of each meeting will be added 

to the Commission’s administrative 

record to ensure that your comments are 

accurately recorded. 

This notice is being sent to the 

Commission’s current environmental 

mailing list for these projects. State and 

local government representatives should 

notify their constituents of these 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

12164 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Notices 

2A pipeline ‘‘loop’’ is a segment of pipe 

constructed parallel to an existing pipeline to 

increase capacity. 

3A ‘‘pig’’ is a tool that the pipeline company 

inserts into and pushes through the pipeline for 

cleaning the pipeline, conducting internal 

inspections, or other purposes. 

4The appendices referenced in this notice will 

not appear in the Federal Register. Copies of the 

appendices were sent to all those receiving this 

notice in the mail and are available at www.ferc.gov 

using the link called ‘‘eLibrary’’ or from the 

Commission’s Public Reference Room, 888 First 

Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call (202) 

502–8371. For instructions on connecting to 

eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice. 

planned projects and encourage them to 

comment on their areas of concern. 

If you are a landowner receiving this 

notice, a pipeline company 

representative may contact you about 

the acquisition of an easement to 

construct, operate, and maintain the 

planned facilities. The company would 

seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable 

agreement. However, if the Commission 

approves the projects, that approval 

conveys with it the right of eminent 

domain. Therefore, if easement 

negotiations fail to produce an 

agreement, the pipeline company could 

initiate condemnation proceedings 

where compensation would be 

determined in accordance with state 

law. 

A fact sheet prepared by the FERC 

entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas 

Facility On My Land? What Do I Need 

To Know?’’ is available for viewing on 

the FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). This 

fact sheet addresses a number of 

typically asked questions, including the 

use of eminent domain and how to 

participate in the Commission’s 

proceedings. 

Summary of the Planned Projects 

The SHP would involve the 

construction and operation of 

approximately 38.7 miles of pipeline 

loop 2 and the modification of existing 

compression facilities in Pennsylvania 

and West Virginia. The pipeline 

facilities associated with the SHP would 

be comprised of two main components: 

(1) Approximately 3.8 miles of 30-inchdiameter natural gas pipeline loop 

adjacent to Dominion’s existing LN–25 

pipeline in Westmoreland County, 

Pennsylvania; and (2) approximately 

34.9 miles of 36-inch-diameter pipeline 

loop adjacent to Dominion’s existing 

TL–360 pipeline in Harrison, 

Doddridge, Tyler, and Wetzel Counties, 

West Virginia. 

In addition to the planned pipelines, 

Dominion plans to modify four existing 

compressor stations in Westmoreland 

and Green Counties, Pennsylvania and 

Marshall and Wetzel Counties, West 

Virginia. Dominion would install new 

gas-fired turbines that would provide for 

a combined increase of 75,700 

horsepower of compression. Dominion 

would also install new valves, pig 

launcher/receiver sites,3 and associated 

appurtenances at these existing 

compressor station locations. 

The ACP Project would involve the 

construction and operation of 554 miles 

of variable diameter natural gas pipeline 

in West Virginia, Virginia, and North 

Carolina. The pipeline facilities 

associated with the ACP Project would 

be comprised of four main components 

as follows: 

• Approximately 295.6 miles of 42- 

inch-diameter pipeline in Harrison, 

Lewis, Upshur, Randolph, and 

Pocahontas Counties, West Virginia; 

Highland, Augusta, Nelson, 

Buckingham, Cumberland, Prince 

Edward, Nottoway, Dinwiddie, 

Brunswick, and Greensville Counties, 

Virginia; and Northampton County, 

North Carolina; 

• approximately 179.9 miles of 36- 

inch-diameter pipeline in Northampton, 

Halifax, Nash, Wilson, Johnston, 

Sampson, Cumberland, and Robeson 

Counties, North Carolina; 

• approximately 75.7 miles of 20- 

inch-diameter lateral pipeline in 

Northampton County, North Carolina; 

and Greensville, Southampton, Suffolk, 

and Chesapeake Counties, Virginia; and 

• approximately 3.1 miles of 16-inchdiameter natural gas lateral pipeline in 

Brunswick County, Virginia. 

In addition to the planned pipelines, 

Atlantic plans to construct and operate 

three new compressor stations totaling 

108,275 horsepower of compression. 

These compressor stations would be 

located in Lewis County, West Virginia; 

Buckingham County, Virginia; and 

Northampton County, North Carolina. 

Atlantic would also install metering 

stations, valves, pig launcher/receiver 

sites, and associated appurtenances 

along the planned pipeline system. 

The SHP and ACP Projects would be 

capable of delivering 1.5 billion cubic 

feet of natural gas per day to seven 

planned distribution points in West 

Virginia, Virginia, and North Carolina. If 

approved, construction of the projects is 

proposed to begin in September 2016. 

The general location of the projects’ 

facilities and a number of alternatives 

under consideration are shown in the 

maps in appendix 1.4

Land Requirements for Construction 

Construction of the planned facilities 

would disturb about 12,972 acres of 

land for the pipeline and aboveground 

facilities. The typical construction rightof-way for pipeline facilities would vary 

between 125 feet wide for the 42-inchdiameter pipeline and 75 feet wide for 

the 16-inch-diameter lateral pipeline, 

with additional workspace needed in 

some locations due to site-specific 

conditions. Following construction, 

approximately 4,370 acres of land 

would be retained for permanent 

operation of the facilities. Land affected 

by construction but not required for 

operation would generally be allowed to 

revert to former uses. 

The EIS Process 

The FERC will be the lead federal 

agency for the preparation of the EIS. 

The U.S. Forest Service (USFS) is 

participating as a cooperating agency 

because the ACP Project would cross the 

Monongahela and George Washington 

National Forests in West Virginia and 

Virginia. As a cooperating agency, the 

USFS intends to adopt the EIS per Title 

40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, 

Part 1506.3 to meet its responsibilities 

under the National Environmental 

Policy Act (NEPA) regarding Atlantic’s 

planned application for a Right-of-Way 

Grant and Temporary Use Permit for 

crossing federally administered lands. 

The USFS additionally will assess how 

the planned pipeline conforms to the 

direction contained in the Monongahela 

and George Washington National 

Forests’ Land and Resource 

Management Plans (LRMP). Changes in 

the LRMP could be required if the 

pipeline is authorized across the 

National Forests. The EIS will provide 

the documentation to support any 

needed amendments to the LRMPs. 

NEPA requires the Commission to 

take into account the environmental 

impacts that could result from an action 

whenever it considers the issuance of a 

Certificate of Public Convenience and 

Necessity. NEPA also requires us to 

discover and address concerns the 

public may have about proposals. This 

process is referred to as scoping. The 

main goal of the scoping process is to 

focus the analysis in the EIS on the 

important environmental issues. By this 

notice, the Commission requests public 

comments on the scope of the issues to 

address in the EIS. We will consider all 

filed comments during the preparation 

of the EIS. 

In the EIS we will discuss impacts 

that could occur as a result of the 

construction and operation of the 

planned projects under these general 

headings: 

• Geology and soils; 

• land use; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Notices 12165 

5The Council on Environmental Quality 

regulations addressing cooperating agency 

responsibilities are at Title 40, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 1501.6. 

6The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation 

regulations are at Title 36, Code of Federal 

Regulations, Part 800. Those regulations define 

historic properties as any prehistoric or historic 

district, site, building, structure, or object included 

in or eligible for inclusion in the National Register 

of Historic Places. 

• water resources, fisheries, and 

wetlands; 

• cultural resources; 

• vegetation and wildlife; 

• air quality and noise; 

• endangered and threatened species; 

• socioeconomics; and 

• public safety. 

We will present our recommendations 

in the EIS on how to lessen or avoid 

impacts on the various resource areas, 

as applicable. 

Dominion and Atlantic are evaluating 

several route alternatives that were 

developed through the company’s route 

selection and constraint analysis 

processes or identified by stakeholders 

during public outreach efforts. Major 

route alternatives that have been 

identified by Dominion and Atlantic are 

presented in appendix 1. More detailed 

maps of these, and other, potential 

alternative routes can be found on the 

FERC Web site at www.ferc.gov, or 

Dominion’s Web site at https://

www.dom.com/corporate/what-we-do/

natural-gas/atlantic-coast-pipeline. Part 

of our NEPA analysis will include 

evaluating possible alternatives to the 

planned projects or portions of the 

projects. Thus, as part of our scoping 

process, we are specifically soliciting 

comments on the range of alternatives 

for both of the projects. 

Although no formal application has 

been filed, we have already initiated our 

NEPA review under the Commission’s 

pre-filing process. The purpose of the 

pre-filing process is to encourage early 

involvement of interested stakeholders 

and to identify and resolve issues before 

the FERC receives an application. As 

part of our pre-filing review, we have 

begun to contact some federal and state 

agencies to discuss their involvement in 

the scoping process and the preparation 

of the EIS. 

The EIS will present our independent 

analysis of the issues. We will publish 

and distribute the draft EIS for public 

comment. After the comment period, we 

will consider all timely comments and 

revise the document, as necessary, 

before issuing a final EIS. To ensure we 

have the opportunity to consider and 

address your comments, please carefully 

follow the instructions in the Public 

Participation section beginning on page 

8. 

With this notice, we are asking 

agencies with jurisdiction by law 

and/or special expertise with respect to 

the environmental issues related to 

these projects to formally cooperate 

with us in the preparation of the EIS.5

Agencies that would like to request 

cooperating agency status should follow 

the instructions for filing comments 

provided under the Public Participation 

section of this notice. As discussed 

above, the USFS has expressed its 

intention to participate as a cooperating 

agency in the preparation of the EIS to 

satisfy its NEPA responsibilities related 

to these projects. In addition to the 

USFS, the U.S. Bureau of Land 

Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife 

Service Great Dismal Swamp National 

Wildlife Refuge, and the U.S. Army 

Corps of Engineers have also agreed to 

participate as cooperating agencies. 

Consultations Under Section 106 of the 

National Historic Preservation Act 

In accordance with the Advisory 

Council on Historic Preservation’s 

implementing regulations for Section 

106 of the National Historic 

Preservation Act, we are using this 

notice to initiate consultation with the 

applicable State Historic Preservation 

Offices, and to solicit their views and 

those of other government agencies, 

interested Indian tribes, and the public 

on the projects’ potential effects on 

historic properties.6 We will define the 

project-specific Area of Potential Effects 

(APE) in consultation with the SHPOs 

as the projects develop. On natural gas 

facility projects, the APE at a minimum 

encompasses all areas subject to ground 

disturbance (examples include 

construction right-of-way, contractor/

pipe storage yards, compressor stations, 

and access roads). Our EIS for these 

projects will document our findings on 

the impacts on historic properties and 

summarize the status of consultations 

under Section 106. 

Currently Identified Environmental 

Issues 

We have already identified several 

issues that we think deserve attention 

based on a preliminary review of the 

planned facilities and the 

environmental information provided by 

Dominion and Atlantic. This 

preliminary list of issues may change 

based on your comments and our 

analysis. 

• Land use impacts, including the 

exercise of eminent domain and future 

land use restrictions; 

• impacts on property values, 

tourism, and recreational resources; 

• safety issues, such as construction 

and operation of the planned facilities 

near existing residences, schools, 

businesses, and military training 

facilities, and in karst and steep slope 

terrain; 

• alternatives, including routing 

within existing linear corridors, 

avoiding private property, National 

Forests, National Parkway lands, 

National Wildlife Refuge land, and other 

sensitive environmental features; 

• impacts on local emergency 

management systems; 

• impacts on forested areas and other 

vegetation; 

• impacts on surface water resources 

including springs, seeps, and wetlands; 

• impacts on groundwater resources 

and wells; 

• impacts on protected species and 

habitat; 

• impacts on cultural resources 

including battlefields, cemeteries, and 

historic properties; and 

• concerns regarding construction 

and operational noise, especially related 

to compressor stations. 

Public Participation 

You can make a difference by 

providing us with your specific 

comments or concerns about the 

projects. Your comments should focus 

on the potential environmental effects, 

reasonable alternatives, and measures to 

avoid or lessen environmental impacts. 

The more specific your comments, the 

more useful they will be. To ensure that 

your comments are timely and properly 

recorded, please send your comments so 

that the Commission receives them in 

Washington, DC on or before April 28, 

2015. 

For your convenience, there are three 

methods you can use to submit your 

comments to the Commission. In all 

instances, please reference the 

appropriate project docket number(s) 

(PF15–5–000 for the SHP and PF15–6– 

000 for the ACP Project) with your 

submission. The Commission 

encourages electronic filing of 

comments and has expert staff available 

to assist you at (202) 502–8258 or 

efiling@ferc.gov. 

(1) You can file your comments 

electronically using the eComment 

feature located on the Commission’s 

Web site (www.ferc.gov) under the link 

to Documents and Filings. This is an 

easy method for interested persons to 

submit brief, text-only comments on a 

project; 

(2) You can file your comments 

electronically using the eFiling feature 

located on the Commission’s Web site 

(www.ferc.gov) under the link to 

Documents and Filings. With eFiling, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

12166 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 44 / Friday, March 6, 2015 / Notices 

you can provide comments in a variety 

of formats by attaching them as a file 

with your submission. New eFiling 

users must first create an account by 

clicking on ‘‘eRegister.’’ You must select 

the type of filing you are making. If you 

are filing a comment on a particular 

project, please select ‘‘Comment on a 

Filing;’’ or 

(3) You can file a paper copy of your 

comments by mailing them to the 

following address: Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 888 First Street NE., Room 

1A, Washington, DC 20426. 

Environmental Mailing List 

The environmental mailing list 

includes federal, state, and local 

government representatives and 

agencies; elected officials; 

environmental and public interest 

groups; Native American Tribes; other 

interested parties; and local libraries 

and newspapers. This list also includes 

all affected landowners (as defined in 

the Commission’s regulations) who are 

potential right-of-way grantors, whose 

property may be used temporarily for 

project purposes, or who own homes 

within certain distances of aboveground 

facilities, as well as anyone who 

submits comments on the projects. We 

will update the environmental mailing 

list as the analysis proceeds to ensure 

that we send the information related to 

this environmental review to all 

individuals, organizations, and 

government entities interested in and/or 

potentially affected by the planned 

projects. 

Copies of the completed draft EIS will 

be sent to the environmental mailing list 

for public review and comment. If you 

would prefer to receive a paper copy of 

the document instead of the CD version 

or would like to remove your name from 

the mailing list, please return the 

attached Information Request (appendix 

2). 

Becoming an Intervenor 

Once Dominion and Atlantic file 

applications with the Commission, you 

may want to become an ‘‘intervenor,’’ 

which is an official party to the 

Commission’s proceeding. Intervenors 

play a more formal role in the process 

and are able to file briefs, appear at 

hearings, and be heard by the courts if 

they choose to appeal the Commission’s 

final ruling. An intervenor formally 

participates in the proceeding by filing 

a request to intervene. Instructions for 

becoming an intervenor are in the User’s 

Guide under the ‘‘e-filing’’ link on the 

Commission’s Web site. Please note that 

the Commission will not accept requests 

for intervenor status at this time. You 

must wait until the Commission 

receives formal applications for the 

projects. 

Additional Information 

Additional information about the 

projects is available from the 

Commission’s Office of External Affairs, 

at (866) 208–FERC, or on the FERC Web 

site (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary 

link. Click on the eLibrary link, click on 

‘‘General Search,’’ and enter the docket 

number, excluding the last three digits 

in the Docket Number field (i.e., PF15– 

5 or PF15–6). Be sure you have selected 

an appropriate date range. For 

assistance, please contact FERC Online 

Support at FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov 

or toll free at (866) 208–3676, or for 

TTY, contact (202) 502–8659. The 

eLibrary link also provides access to the 

texts of formal documents issued by the 

Commission, such as orders, notices, 

and rulemakings. 

In addition, the Commission offers a 

free service called eSubscription that 

allows you to keep track of all formal 

issuances and submittals in specific 

dockets. This can reduce the amount of 

time you spend researching proceedings 

by automatically providing you with 

notification of these filings, document 

summaries, and direct links to the 

documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/esubscription.asp. 

Finally, public meetings or site visits 

will be posted on the Commission’s 

calendar located at www.ferc.gov/

EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along 

with other related information. 

Dated: February 27, 2015. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05248 Filed 3–5–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Combined Notice of Filings #1 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following exempt 

wholesale generator filings: 

Docket Numbers: EG15–58–000. 

Applicants: Oak Grove Management 

Company LLC. 

Description: Self-Certification of EG of 

Oak Grove Management Company LLC. 

Filed Date: 3/2/15. 

Accession Number: 20150302–5139. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/23/15. 

Docket Numbers: EG15–59–000. 

Applicants: Sandow Power Company 

LLC. 

Description: Self-Certification of EG of 

Sandow Power Company LLC. 

Filed Date: 3/2/15. 

Accession Number: 20150302–5141. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/23/15. 

Take notice that the Commission 

received the following electric rate 

filings: 

Docket Numbers: ER13–2109–003; 

ER13–2106–003; ER10–1410–003; ER13– 

321–003; ER13–412–002; ER13–450–002; 

ER13–434–002; ER13–518–002; ER13– 

1403–004; ER14–2140–003; ER14–2141– 

003; ER15–632–001; ER15–634–001; 

ER14–2466–002; ER14–2465–002; 

Applicants: Fowler Ridge Wind Farm 

LLC, Cottonwood Solar, LLC, CID Solar, 

LLC, RE Camelot LLC, RE Columbia 

Two LLC, Selmer Farm, LLC, Mulberry 

Farm, LLC, Dominion Retail, Inc., 

Dominion Energy Manchester Street, 

Inc., Dominion Energy Marketing, Inc., 

Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, LLC, 

Fairless Energy, LLC, NedPower Mount 

Storm, LLC, Dominion Bridgeport Fuel 

Cell, LLC, Virginia Electric and Power 

Company. 

Description: Supplement to January 9, 

2015 Notice of Non-Material Change in 

Status of the Dominion Companies. 

Filed Date: 2/19/15. 

Accession Number: 20150219–5211. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/12/15. 

Docket Numbers: ER14–1639–003. 

Applicants: ISO New England Inc. 

Description: Compliance filing per 35: 

Compliance Filing Concerning the 

Renewable Technology Resource 

Exemption to be effective 3/2/2015. 

Filed Date: 3/2/15. 

Accession Number: 20150302–5275. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/23/15. 

Docket Numbers: ER15–124–002. 

Applicants: Tucson Electric Power 

Company. 

Description: Tariff Amendment per 

35.17(b): Response to Deficiency Letter 

dated January 15, 2015 to be effective 9/ 

17/2014. 

Filed Date: 3/2/15. 

Accession Number: 20150302–5180. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/23/15. 

Docket Numbers: ER15–542–001. 

Applicants: Midcontinent 

Independent System Operator, Inc. 

Description: Compliance filing per 35: 

2015–03–02_Land Costs Recovery 

Compliance Filing to be effective 1/31/ 

2015. 

Filed Date: 3/2/15. 

Accession Number: 20150302–5304. 

Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/23/15. 

Docket Numbers: ER15–933–001. 

Applicants: Midcontinent 

Independent System Operator, Inc. 

Description: Tariff Amendment per 

35.17(b): 2015–03–02_Amend Schedule 

31 Annual Update to be effective 4/1/

2015. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES