alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016176EN.01000101.xml

| 18.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 176/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 176/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 May 2016

(2016/C 176/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1324 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4385 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3370 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1059 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2370 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,50 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3718 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4876 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3760 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5526 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4634 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7910 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6657 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5511 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6310 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3865 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4965 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 069,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5639 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,652 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,5759 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,064 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9999 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6176 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,6940 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1324

JPY

Japanese yen

123,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4385

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78800

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3370

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1059

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2370

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,50

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3718

RON

Romanian leu

4,4876

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3760

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5526

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4634

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7910

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6657

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5511

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,90

ZAR

South African rand

17,6310

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3865

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4965

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 069,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5639

PHP

Philippine peso

52,652

RUB

Russian rouble

73,5759

THB

Thai baht

40,064

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9999

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6176

INR

Indian rupee

75,6940

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016357EN.01000101.xml

| 29.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7893 — Plastic Omnium/Faurecia Exterior Automotive Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 357/01)

On 11 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7893. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7893. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,160                  31,045
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,513                   4,164
<ALLOWANCES>                                       190                      95
<INVENTORY>                                      5,851                   8,595
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,216                  45,769
<PP&E>                                          79,993                  73,556
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,889                  33,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 272,544                 225,375
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,677                   7,798
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           30,000                  30,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           128                     128
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,006                 179,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   272,544                 225,375
<SALES>                                        106,957                 104,208
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,500                 106,221
<CGS>                                           75,656                  67,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,987                  72,537
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,657                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,387                     370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,777                  27,252
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,303                  10,678
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,474                  16,574
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,474                  16,574
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48                    1.29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.48                    1.29
        

</TABLE>
GREGORY OMAR JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-3172

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County.

John L. Miller, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, 

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, ROWE, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

OCT 09 2014-· 

Mr. Kumaresan Subramaniam 

Engineering Director 

ST Aerospace Mobile, Inc. 

2100 9th Street, Brookley Complex 

Mobile, Alabama 36615 

Dear Mr Subramaniam: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

Petition for Exemption - Request for Additional Information 

In your letter dated May 9, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

for relief from the requirements of§§ 25.7850), 25.807(g)(l) and (i)(1), 25.812(e), 

25.813(b)(l) and (6), 25.1445(a)(2), and 25.1447(c)(1) of Title 14, Code ofFederal 

Regulations (14 CFR) to allow carriage ofnon-crewmembers (commonly referred to as 

supernumeraries) within the flight deck area on Boeing Model 757-200 airplanes that have 

been converted from a passenger to freighter configuration. Although it was not mentioned 

in the petition letter, we reviewed Figure 2 in the information you submitted and confirmed 

with a telephone call that your intent was also to request relief from§ 25.810(a)(l), 

requiring passenger exits to be equipped with a self-supporting slide or equivalent assist 

means. 

In addition to omitting§ 25.810(a)(l) from your request for relief, we believe that you also 

inadvertently omitted consideration of§ 25.857(e). As you are aware from previous 

exemptions (e.g., Exemption No. 9487, Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-28177), all such 

petitions for exemption must request relief from the requirement of§ 25.857(e), which 

permits carriage of cargo within a Class E cargo compartment on the airplane when operated 

in an all-cargo configuration (only flightcrew on the airplane). Therefore, we are 

requesting that you provide confirmation by amending your petition to include 

§ 25.857(e) for the carriage of supernumeraries in addition to flightcrew on freighter 

airplanes. Of course, your design will be expected to meet all other requirements of 

§ 25.857(e) concerning smoke or fire detector system; a means to shut off the ventilating 

airflow to, or within, the compartment, and the controls for these means are accessible to the 

flightcrew in the crew compartment; and that the required crew emergency exits are 

accessible under any cargo loading condition. 
Thank you for your attention to this matter. You may submit your amended petition to the 

Department of Transportation's Federal Docket Management System (Docket No. FAA2014-0351) online at Regulations.gov. After we receive your amended petition and are 

satisfied with the information you provide, we will amend Exemption 11060 (dated 

September 23, 2014), to reflect the additional relief sought from§ 25.857(e). If you have 

any questions, please contact Mr. Steve Happenny by telephone at (425) 227-2147 or byemail at Stephen.Happenny@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

{IJVtf!__ 

Victor Wicklund 

Manager, Propulsion & Mechanical Systems 

Transport Standards Staff 

2
TRACIE CORLEY & ALISSA 

BOWLES,

Appellants,

v.

ONE WEST BANK, N.A.,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5545

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 17, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Tyrie W. Boyer, Judge.

Tracie Corley and Alissa Bowles, pro se, Appellants.

Heidi J. Bassett of Robertson, Anschutz & Schneid, P.L., Boca Raton and Joshua 

H. Threadcraft of Burr & Forman, LLP, Birmingham, AL, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WINOKUR, JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
July 30, 2015

Mr. Jeff Webbe

Owner and Operator

Aerial PIC LLC 17941 West Jojoba Road Goodyear, AZ 85338

Dear Mr. Webbe :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from

part s 21 , 36 ; § § 45.23(b)

, 61.113(a) and (b)

, 61.133(a)

, 91.7(a) and (b)

, 91.9(b)(2)

, 91.119

, 91.121

, 91.151(a) and (b)

, 91.203(a) and (b)

, 91.207

, 91.405(a)

, 91.407(a)(1)

, 91.409(a)(2)

, and 91.417(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request o n behalf of Aerial PIC LLC filed into the public docket (No. FAA− 2015

− 1763 ) on May 19

, 2015 , but we are unable to process your request any

further. Your petiti on does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Avia tion Administration (FAA) requirements outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

I f you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/ Brittany Newton Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure3
KRYSTAIN TARNOWSKI,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2852

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack M. Schemer, Judge.

Krystain Tarnowski, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEPHEN J. DONELL, Permanent

Receiver for Learn Waterhouse, Inc., its

subsidiaries and affiliates,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RANDY TEINERT; CATHY TEINERT,

 Defendants - Appellants.

No. 11-56432

D.C. No. 3:10-cv-01444-W-CAB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Randy and Cathy Teinert appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment in

an action seeking avoidance and recovery of fraudulent transfers under California

law. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of

FILED

MAY 23 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
discretion the district court’s denial of a motion to set aside entry of default. 

United States v. Signed Personal Check No. 730 of Yubran S. Mesle, 615 F.3d

1085, 1091 (9th Cir. 2010). We vacate and remand.

In its order granting default judgment and denying the Teinerts’ motion to

set aside default, the district court “omitted any mention of the ‘extreme

circumstances’ requirement for judgment by default.” Id. at 1091. Its failure to do

so was an abuse of discretion. See id. at 1091-92 (absent such extreme

circumstances, judgment by default is inappropriate); see also id. at 1089 (“Our

rules for determining when a default should be set aside are solicitous towards

movants, especially those whose actions leading to the default were taken without

the benefit of legal representation.”). 

Accordingly, we vacate the entry of default judgment and remand for

reconsideration in light of Signed Personal Check No. 730.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED.

2 11-56432
**Exhibit 21****SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**     **Jurisdiction of****Subsidiary** **Incorporation**Midway Interactive Inc. DelawareMidway Home Entertainment Inc. DelawareMidway Games West Inc. (formerly, Atari Games Corporation) CaliforniaMidway Games Limited United KingdomMidway Amusement Games, LLC Delaware (LLC)Midway Sales Company, LLC Delaware (LLC)Midway Home Studios Inc. DelawareK. K. Midway Games JapanMidway Games Canada Corp. CanadaSurreal Software Inc. WashingtonMidway Studios – Austin Inc. TexasMidway Studios – Los Angeles Inc. CaliforniaMidway Games GmbH GermanyMidway Australia Holdings Pty Ltd AustraliaRatbag Holdings Pty Ltd AustraliaMidway Studios – Australia Pty Ltd AustraliaMidway Studios – Newcastle Limited United KingdomMidway Games SAS France
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-9925-22-OA]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be held April 21 and 22, 2015 at the Sheraton Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. The CHPAC was created to advise the Environmental Protection Agency on science, regulations, and other issues relating to children's environmental health.

# DATES:

The CHPAC will meet April 21 and 22, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Martha Berger, Office of Children's Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-2191 or                         *berger.martha@epa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the public. The CHPAC will meet on April 21 from 12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., and April 22 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Sheraton Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. An agenda will be posted at                     *epa.gov/children.*

*Access and Accommodations:*                     For information on access or services for individuals with disabilities, please contact Martha Berger at 202-564-2191 or                     *berger.martha@epa.gov.*

Dated: March 12, 2015.

Martha Berger,

Designated Federal Official.

[FR Doc. 2015-06876 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
EXHIBIT
32.1.


Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








I, Ed
Bailey, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of LightTouch
Vein & Laser, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period March 31, 2009 of the Registrant,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"):





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:  May
20,
2009               By:  /s/ Ed
Bailey


Ed
Bailey


Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Accounting


Officer





* A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and will be retained by LightTouch
Vein & Laser, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Tenth National Bank of Philadelphia *v.*Smith Construction Company

(No. 1).

October 7, 1907 :

*Mechanics’ liens*— Claim *against public improvement*— Notice *to owner —Subcontractor.*

A subcontractor who furnishes material for a city improvement, in availing himself of the provisions of sec. 6 of the Act, of June 4, 1901, P. L. 431, to establish a claim against a public improvement, must give the preliminary notice of an intention to file a lien as required to be given under sec. 8 of the act to establish a lien against the property of a private owner.

Argued March 13, 1907.

Appeal, No. 23, March T., 1907, by William H. Grothe, from decree of C. P. York Co., April Term, 1905, No. 1, sustaining exceptions to auditor’s report in case of The Tenth National Bank of Philadelphia v. The Smith Construction Company.

Before Rice, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Head and Beaver, JJ.

Reversed.

Exceptions to auditor’s report.

For the facts see Tenth National Bank of Philadelphia v. Smith Construction Company (No. 1), 218 Pa. 581.

*Charles A.*Hawkins, with him *Jere S. Black,*for appellant.

*Henry C. Niles,*with him *George E. Neff,*for appellee.

Opinion by

Orlady, J.,

In The Tenth National Bank of Philadelphia (Fourth Street National Bank of Philadelphia, Appellant) v. The Smith Construction Company, 218 Pa. 581, decided by the Supreme Court on June 3, 1907, the same question as is presented for our consideration in this appeal was disposed of, and following that decision for the reasons therein stated, the same order is made. The decree in this case is reversed and the report of the auditor absolutely confirmed, the costs on this appeal to be paid by the appellee.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Top Image Systems Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ido Schechter, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: April 26, 2009

| |  | /s/ Ido Schechter
Ido SchechterChief Executive Officer
| |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---