alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016239EN.01000301.xml

| 1.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 June 2016

(2016/C 239/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1102 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,05 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82650 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4242 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0867 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3008 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,131 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 317,06 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4362 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5234 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2060 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4929 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4384 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6135 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5616 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4957 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 278,48 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,4461 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3755 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5281 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 601,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4301 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,241 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,5200 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,007 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5898 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6347 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,9603 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1102

JPY

Japanese yen

114,05

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82650

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4242

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0867

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3008

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,131

HUF

Hungarian forint

317,06

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4362

RON

Romanian leu

4,5234

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2060

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4929

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4384

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6135

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5616

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4957

KRW

South Korean won

1 278,48

ZAR

South African rand

16,4461

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3755

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5281

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 601,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4301

PHP

Philippine peso

52,241

RUB

Russian rouble

71,5200

THB

Thai baht

39,007

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5898

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6347

INR

Indian rupee

74,9603

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016225EN.01000102.xml

| 22.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8037 — INCJ/Sumitomo/Sekisui/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 225/02)

On 16 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8037. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8037. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
RODNEY MCCUTCHEON

,
Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE N O. 1D 14

- 2098

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 6, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County

. Terry P. Lewis , Judge

.
Rodney McCutcheon, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and David W. Grimes, Assistan t Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK

, WETHERELL

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-15-00792-CR

John Wayne POLLY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 375971

The Honorable Robert Behrens, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE MARTINEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED November 23, 2016.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
**Exhibit 31. 1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Richard K. Williams, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced AnalogicTechnologies Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for the first quarter ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Intentionallyomitted pursuant to SEC rules] 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 10, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          29,025
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,656,167
<ALLOWANCES>                                   282,500
<INVENTORY>                                  1,524,261
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,951,672
<PP&E>                                       2,949,427
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,184,320
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,763,759
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,600,861
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        51,045
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,063,982
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,763,759
<SALES>                                     50,218,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,218,161
<CGS>                                       46,430,198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               71,017,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            14,353,137
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               282,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,538,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (36,691,296)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (702,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (35,988,896)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.88)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.88)


</TABLE>
P.1 

OAR Box 1802 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

83) IV-E-77 

Docket Number: 

A-90-37 

Printed 11/4/200811:58:00 AM Sheet 83 of 117 
P.2 

IV-E-77 

NEDA/CARP Meeting with 

Bill Harnett and the NSR Group 

February 1, 2002 

10:00-11:00 a.m. 

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, C-300A 

• Introductions 

• Status of NSR Report 

• 3 Pollutant Bill and NSR Relief Mechanisms Potential for Industry 

Off-Ramp? 

• Status of EPA NSR Rulemaking 

• Schedules and NSR Transition Issues 

• Possibility of Help on Aggregation, Debottlenecking, ODS De 

Minimis Thresholds 

• Status Re Guidance on Combined Heat Projects, Combined Cycle 

Turbines, Single Cycle Turbines 

• Projects with FLMs 

NWDC • 64622/1 • #1469397 vl 
P.3 

January 31 - February 1, 2002 

NEDA/CARP ATTENDEES 

Roy Carwile 

ALCOA, Inc. 

New York 

Jerry Fulmer 

Mike Palazzoio 

ALCOA, Inc. 

Pennsylvania 

Matthew Frank (via phone) 

Boeing 

Virginia 

Debby Rowe 

DaimlerChrysler 

Michigan 

Bernie Paul 

Barbara Bankoff 

Eli Lilly 

Indiana 

Shannon Broome (via phone) 

NEDA/CARP 

California 

Matthew Tanzer 

General Electric 

Washington, D.C. 

Don Clay 

Koch Industries 

Washington, D.C. 

Todd Hyde 

Mike Babos 

Merck & Co. 

New Jersey 

\\\DC • 64622/1 • #1469276 vl 
P.4 

Robert Morehouse 

Norm Morrow 

Mike Innerarity 

ExxonMobil 

Texas 

Chuck Feerick 

ExxonMobil 

Virginia Al Collins 

Occidental Petroleum 

Washington, D.C. 

David Emery 

Phillips Petroleum 

Oklahoma 

Randy Poteet 

Phillips Petroleum 

Alaska 

William Burkhart 

Maxine Dewbury 

Procter & Gamble 

Ohio 

Leslie Ritts 

NEDA/CARP 

Washington, D.C. 

\\\DC • 64622/1 • #1469276 vl
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALEJANDRO ALERS, Sr.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-55774

D.C. No. 2:14-cv-00611-GW-JCG

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

George H. Wu, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Alejandro Alers, Sr. appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action alleging violations of the Racketeering Influenced and 

Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”) arising from a withdrawal from Alers’ bank 

account with Bank of America, N.A. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-55774 

§ 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of 

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir. 2010). We 

affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Alers’ RICO claims against Bank of 

America, N.A. as precluded by California’s doctrine of res judicata because the 

parties previously litigated the claims to final judgment in California state 

court. See Adam Bros. Farming, Inc. v. County of Santa Barbara, 604 F.3d 1142, 

1148-49 (9th Cir. 2010) (describing California’s res judicata requirements).

The district court properly determined that defendant’s attorneys are 

immune from liability under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine because Alers’ factual 

allegations in his complaint failed to establish that the sham exception is 

applicable. See Sosa v. DIRECTV, Inc., 437 F.3d 923, 929-30, 938 (9th Cir.

2006) (explaining the Noerr-Pennington doctrine and the circumstances where the 

sham exception is applicable).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Alers’ motions for 

entry of default judgment. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir.

1986) (setting forth the standard of review and factors for determining whether to 

enter default judgment).
3 14-55774 

We do not consider arguments that were not presented to the district court. 

See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

Alers’ request for judicial notice, filed on October 20, 2014, is granted.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1

   
    
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.2


                              MS ACQUISITION CORP.
                        INFORMATION ON RATIO OF EARNINGS
                          TO FIXED CHARGES COMPUTATION
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)


   
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      1996          1995        1994          1993        1992
<S>                                                <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>        <C>
Net income (loss) before the effect
 of accounting changes                             $    3,436   $   4,576    $   6,595    $     915    $ (2,768)
Income taxes                                            1,972       1,877        4,000          930        (347)
Pre-tax income                                          5,408       6,453       10,595        1,845      (3,115)
Fixed charges per below                                11,013       9,795        9,800        9,659      10,299
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Earnings (losses) from operations                      16,421      16,248       20,395       11,504       7,184
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Fixed charges:
    Interest expense                                    9,406       8,579        8,929        9,020       9,206
    Debt amortization                                     763         442          198           99         557
    Rent expense - portion of operating
     rentals representative of the interest factor        844         774          673          540         536
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Total fixed charges                                    11,013       9,795        9,800        9,659      10,299
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------

Ratio of income to fixed charges                          1.5         1.7          2.1          1.2 (1)
</TABLE>
    

   
(1)  The deficiency of earnings from operations versus fixed charges was $3.1
     million for the year ended December 27, 1992.
    


                                      59
REF ID:A71797 

CO~FIE>E:~ffl.°' .. L. Sl ,.TflPf lfffORMATIJN 

IS JW118 1953 

MIKIU!mt.r..f FOR 'l'HE CHJJi:P OF STAPP 

SOBJ9l'J?1 Cate:.,rories ot BSA Specialties a..1\d Personnel Skilled 'tb.9~ 

1. We have recently caupleted a ratr.er 81.abonte NS.A tlmriell)Y 

1iat' Plan. ~e also have a det.tdled NSA Disaster Pla."l. In co.me::tion 

thertr.dth I r~cn.~1d tor ooneider3U.on the ut4lity- of F8!'arl.n.J am 

perl.odic::ll.;r revim.113 a doc-.DJnt 1n which would be l.iat-ed (a) the 

~OUB t.ec..lulical and ad-"11.."'listrative apacialtiea or int.erest to HSA 

ald (b) the NSA par3on.nel (al>ove the level ot aa,y GS--9) skilled in 

thoee specialties. 

It ?nclosriro l is a sa:.1pl.e llat of 8pecd el ties. It could ~ b!3 e:cpanded to covor aeo.1ents ·.Jr our fi.eld wh1~1 have 'boon ~ooked, 110 u to ma."<e tho liet1nc fa:trl.y C<Dpl.ete. 

J. 'rho queati·ln ot e.sai:rr.ent or- personnol into these catu~ories 

ot special.ties, a.""ld upeci~ the question ot liat:ln& t..tio speoi aliets 

in each catogor1 :.n l!IO'!'lle reltt:tin ra.lk bnsed upon a.."l. evaluation of 

their individual skill and a:per:!..enae present rather delicate piobleri...s ~ 1 ~:P!>OSC tho llats e clll.d ba draiin up to the satisf.ac tJ.on of tbe 

ll&jol"ity 1)r t.he high-cictielon NSA guid:J• s:uthorl.t1ea, 

4. It is rec0l!J·te.1ded that this paper bo .tcr-..rt.rdod to the Cbiof's 

el atflce:r and Start Divisions tor ccn'ilent. If tho project :aets 

'Id.th eenaral approvol, t.lion a small group could be appol.ntcd t.:t 

S"eC·:rn:t:ld a project and a pl.A.i. of procedure ~ :bGpl im.Y3nt it. 

l Incl: 

Cetc.;ot'iee or Cr,ypl;ai~ ~:->ecialties 

• 

W'n.LIA~ F .. FRIEDMAN 

Special .Aasista.nli 

C t)eJ~\ IAL Olti I 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

- . . 
------·----··- -

REF ID:A71797 

COifflDENTIAL 

l. ProerC'l planniil{t (large pr::tblS"la requiring lcmg-r~~o, long ... 'tcu o;:arations) 

It Salut.1on ot cGJ:Jple:z: JUn.ual. 918ttr'e 

l,. Sa117t:lon ot c17Pto-""..ae1d119 11111tens (literal &-id teleprintar) 

Ji. er,pta ~alytd.c 'lll8Ch.inel""J' (dam.GU eind utilization) 

S. Or""f".'lto--:mtb1.":Jaticia.'lB 

6. soluti Jft of cip..liol\f..Citax s;vsi:.«:c 

7 • C17!>f.o-lin.:.,i.dst.s 

CONFl6ENTIAL 

?nclosi.:ro t.o Mf!'l> to C/51 dtd 25 Juns 53 

-·-----· '
STACIE GREEK

,
Appellant,

v.

KANGAROO EXPRESS, INC.

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1953

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 14, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Lawrence P. Haddock , Judge

.

Michael D. McGrath and Kevin J. Loftus of McGrath Gibson, LLC, Jacksonville

, for Appellant.

Keef F. Owens and Andrea Caro of Zimmerman, Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando

, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., BENTON and KELSEY

, J J

. , CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                              145208
<SECURITIES>                                         10332
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    295536
<PP&E>                                               97023
<DEPRECIATION>                                       70749
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      330445
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               612851
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                             20
<COMMON>                                             92024
<OTHER-SE>                                         (874450)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        330445
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      1500699
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     79217
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    6667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1428149)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          3999
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1432148)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1432148)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.16)





</TABLE>