alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 58 (Thursday, March 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06912]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLIDT000000.L11200000.DD0000.241A.00; 4500069133]


Notice of Public Meetings, Twin Falls District Resource Advisory 
Council, Idaho

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
(FLPMA), the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (FACA), the U.S. 
Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Twin Falls 
District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as indicated below.

DATES: The Twin Falls District RAC will meet April 22, 2015, at the 
Sawtooth Best Western Inn, 2653 S. Lincoln Avenue, Jerome, Idaho 83338. 
The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and end no later than 3:00 p.m. The 
public comment period will take place from 9:10 a.m. to 9:40 a.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Tiel-Nelson, Twin Falls 
District, Idaho, 2536 Kimberly Road, Twin Falls, Idaho 83301, (208) 
736-2352.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 15-member RAC advises the Secretary of 
the Interior, through the Bureau of Land Management, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in Idaho. During the April 22nd meeting, there will be an overview of 
the roles and responsibilities of a BLM manager, an update on the Idaho 
and Southwest Montana Sub-regional Sage-Grouse Draft Environmental 
Impact Statement, and field office updates. Additional topics may be 
added and will be included in local media announcements.
    More information is available at www.blm.gov/id/st/en/res/resource_advisory.3.html. RAC meetings are open to the public.

    Authority: 43 CFR 1784.4-1.

Elizabeth Maclean,
BLM Twin Falls District Manager (Acting).
[FR Doc. 2015-06912 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-GG-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350

(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capella Education Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lois M. Martin, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lois M. Martin                               
|Lois M. Martin                                   
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|October 27, 2009                                 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SERVED: JULY 14, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC IN THE MATTER OF JUSTIN LEIGHTON STANLEY DOCKETNO. FAA-2015-1326 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 'i
.._J .

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2015WP010044) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons on the attached Service List.

Attachment
- Service List nnie A. Yoder ChiefAdministrative LaSERVICE LIST - BY

### U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY


### Robert M. Helfend, Respondent's Counsel 

### Law Offices ofRobertM. Helfend 23838 Pacific Coast Highway No. 309 Malibu, CA 90265 TEL: 818-591-2809 FAX: 310-456-3317 Lierre Green, Complainant's Counsel 

### Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AWP-7.6 Western-Pacific Region Federal Aviation Administration P. 

### 0. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7117 FAX: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 Docket No. FAA-2015-1326 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., WilbUr Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### 2
1 The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3403

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Arkansas. Juan Carlos Aguilera-Alvarado, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: July 22, 2004 Filed: July 23, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Juan Carlos Aguilera-Alvarado pleaded guilty to illegal reentry after deportation following an aggravated-felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). The district court 1 sentenced him to 77 months imprisonment and 3 years supervised release. On appeal, Aguilera-Alvarado’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967).-2- After careful review, we find the issues counsel raises unavailing. By pleading guilty unconditionally, Aguilera-Alvarado waived any suppression issue, cf. United States v. Arrellano , 213 F.3d 427, 430 (8th Cir. 2000) (defendant waived right to appeal denial of his motion to suppress where he did not enter conditional guilty plea reserving right to appeal denial of motion); the prosecutor’s recital of the date of the offense as being one day earlier than that stated in the indictment did not constructively amend the indictment, cf. United States v. Harris , 344 F.3d 803, 804- 05 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (where defendant’s admitted possession of firearm on October 9 was “reasonably near” October 16 date alleged in indictment, conduct was within scope of indictment and there was no constructive amendment), cert. denied , 124 S. Ct. 1463 (2004); and counsel fails to point to anything in the record that would call into question the district court’s finding that Aguilera-Alvarado was competent and made the plea voluntarily and knowingly.
Further, a 16-level offense-level enhancement was properly applied based on Aguilera-Alvarado’s prior California conviction for robbery, see United States v. Valladares , 304 F.3d 1300, 1301-03 (8th Cir. 2002), and did not violate Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), seeUnited States v. Raya-Ramirez , 244 F.3d 976, 977 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 534 U.S. 898 (2001). We also find that the district court did not commit error in imposing a $1,000 fine, an amount significantly less than the calculated range. Last, we decline to consider a constitutional challenge to the PROTECT Act, Pub. L. No. 108-21 § 401, 117 Stat. 650, 657 (2003), amending 18 U.S.C. § 3742(e), raised for the first time on appeal. See Liberty State Bank v. Minn. Life & Health Ins. Guar. Ass’n , 149 F.3d 832, 834 (8th Cir. 1998).
We also have carefully reviewed the record independently pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and we have found no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we affirm. We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

______________________________
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

ANTHONY JAMES BARTLEY, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 14-0648 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Yavapai County

No. P1300CR20080506

 P1300CR20081074

The Honorable Celé Hancock, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Yavapai County Attorney’s Office, Prescott

By Michael P. McGill

Counsel for Respondent

Craig Williams, Attorney at Law, P.L.L.C., Prescott Valley

By Craig Williams

Counsel for Petitioner
STATE v. BARTLEY

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop delivered the decision of the Court, in which 

Presiding Judge Kent E. Cattani and Chief Judge Michael J. Brown joined.

W I N T H R O P, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner, Anthony James Bartley, petitions this court for 

review of the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief of-right. The 

sole issue Bartley presents for review is whether the trial court erred when

it ordered Bartley to serve two prison sentences consecutively as a result of 

his convictions—and subsequent probation violations—in Yavapai County 

case no. P1300CR20080506. We deny relief because the issue is moot. 

Bartley has been absolutely discharged from those two sentences and is no 

longer in prison, nor is he exposed to further imprisonment for those two 

convictions.

¶2 Accordingly, we grant review, but deny relief.
Dear Mr. Fiquett :

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA−2015

− 2875 )

. This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to

proce ed without this manual and remove closed

- set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non

- proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov

. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the infor mation described above by 11/11/15 . I f we do not receive the
information

, we will close the dock et without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267

- 4549

.

Sincerely,
/s/
Michael J. Cameron Program Analyst
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-30967

Summary Calendar

DANNIE R. HAYWARD, SR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOLYNN WILLIAMS, Nurse; CARLA HAWKINS; PAM PORTER; 

REKIESHA SCOTT; CATHY ROULE; GARY WILSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

No. 3:07-CV-72

Before DAVIS, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dannie Hayward, Sr., former Louisiana prisoner # 301013, moves this

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

July 17, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 11-30967 Document: 00511923689 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/17/2012
No. 11-30967

court for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) in his appeal of the dismissal

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights lawsuit. By moving for IFP status, Hayward

is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in

good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); FED. R. APP.

P. 24(a). 

Hayward argues that it would be a hardship to pay the costs of his appeal

and that justice requires that the appeal be heard. He does not address the

district court’s certification that his appeal is not taken in good faith or any of

the court’s reasons for its decision. See Baugh, 117 F.3d at 202. Accordingly, his

challenge is deemed abandoned. See Brinkmann v. Dall. Cnty. Deputy Sheriff

Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). 

Additionally, Hayward has not shown that his appeal involves “legal

points arguable on their merits (and therefore not frivolous).” Howard v. King,

707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983) (per curiam). The motion to proceed IFP on

appeal is DENIED, and the appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117

F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Because Hayward was incarcerated at the time he filed his notice of

appeal, this dismissal counts as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387-88 (5th Cir. 1996). Hayward is cautioned

that if he accumulates three strikes under § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained

in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 

See § 1915(g).

2

Case: 11-30967 Document: 00511923689 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/17/2012
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1
COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

 

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        YEAR ENDED
                                                         JUNE 30,
                                        ------------------------------------------
                                            1998           1997           1996
                                        ------------   ------------   ------------
                                         (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT FOR PER SHARE DATA)

<S>                                         <C>           <C>             <C>
Net income                                  $2,792        $3,100         $3,159
                                            ------        ------          -----
                                            ------        ------          -----
Basic:

Weighted average number
  of common stock shares
  outstanding                               10,525         7,054          4,442
                                            ------        ------          -----
                                            ------        ------          -----
Basic earnings per share                    $ 0.27        $ 0.44          $0.71
                                            ------        ------          -----
                                            ------        ------          -----
Diluted:

Weighted average number of common 
  stock shares outstanding                  10,525         7,054          4,442
Weighted average number of 
  preferred stock shares 
  outstanding                                   --         1,478          2,336
Common stock equivalents from the 
  issuance of options using the 
  treasury stock method                        544           632            757
Cheap stock adjustment                          --           131            131
                                            ------        ------          -----
Shares used in computing net
  income per share                          11,069         9,295          7,666
                                            ------        ------          -----
                                            ------        ------          -----
Diluted earnings per share                   $0.25         $0.33          $0.41
                                            ------        ------          -----
                                            ------        ------          -----

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


   
    
                                                                   EXHIBIT 12.1



                             AETNA INDUSTRIES, INC.
                        INFORMATION ON RATIO OF EARNINGS
                          TO FIXED CHARGES COMPUTATION
                                 (IN THOUSANDS)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      1996          1995        1994          1993        1992
<S>                                                <S>          <C>          <C>          <C>          <C>
Net income (loss) before the effect
 of accounting changes                             $    5,798   $   4,576    $   6,595    $     915    $ (2,768)
Income taxes                                            2,105       1,877        4,000          930        (347)
Pre-tax income                                          7,903       6,453       10,595        1,845      (3,115)
Fixed charges per below                                10,629       9,795        9,800        9,659      10,299
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Earnings (losses) from operations                      18,532      16,248       20,395       11,504       7,184
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Fixed charges:
    Interest expense                                    9,022       8,579        8,929        9,020       9,206
    Debt amortization                                     763         442          198           99         557
    Rent expense - portion of operating
     rentals representative of the interest factor        844         774          673          540         536
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------
Total fixed charges                                    10,629       9,795        9,800        9,659      10,299
                                                   ----------   ---------    ---------    ---------    --------

Ratio of income to fixed charges                          1.7         1.7          2.1         1.2 (1)
</TABLE>

(1)  The deficiency of earnings from operations versus fixed charges was $3.1
     million for the year ended December 27, 1992.



                                      58
# EXHIBIT 99.4

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Werner T. Heid, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Werner T. Heid

Werner T. Heid
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2002
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements of NationalOilwell Varco, Inc. and each related Prospectus of our reports dated February 28, 2008, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of National Oilwell Varco, Inc.,and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of NationalOilwell Varco, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,2007.   Form Description   S-8 National-Oilwell, Inc. Stock Award and Long Term Incentive Plan, Value Appreciation and Incentive Plan A and ValueAppreciation and Incentive Plan B (No. 333-15859)   S-8 National-Oilwell Retirement and Thrift Plan (No. 333-36359)   S-8 Post Effective Amendment No. 3 to the Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8 pertaining to the Dreco EnergyServices Ltd. Amended and Restated 1989 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan, as amended, and Employment and CompensationArrangements Pursuant to Private Stock Option Agreements (No. 333-21191)   S-8 Post Effective Amendment No. 1 on Form S-8 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 pertaining to the IRI InternationalCorporation Equity Incentive Plan (No. 333-36644)   S-8 National Oilwell Varco, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (No. 333-123310)   S-8 National Oilwell Varco, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (No. 333-123301)   S-8 Varco International, Inc. 2003 Equity Participation Plan; Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended; VarcoInternational, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan; 1994 Directors’ Stock Option Plan; Varco International, Inc. 401(k)/ProfitSharing Plan (No. 333-123287)   S-8 Varco International, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan (No. 333-123286)   S-8 National-Oilwell, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Award and Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan (No. 333-118721)   S-4 Registration Statement on Form S-4 for the registration of shares of common stock in conjunction with the merger withVarco International, Inc. (No. 333-119071)/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPHouston, Texas
# C_2015099EN.01000201.xml

| 26.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 March 2015

(2015/C 99/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0985 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4688 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73650 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3026 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0517 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5930 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,378 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0858 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4147 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8089 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3925 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3711 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5191 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4322 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5023 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 208,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,9574 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8244 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6518 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 242,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0271 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,163 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,5738 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,715 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4334 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3611 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,5150 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0985

JPY

Japanese yen

131,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4688

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73650

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3026

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0517

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5930

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,378

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0858

RON

Romanian leu

4,4147

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8089

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3925

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3711

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5191

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4322

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5023

KRW

South Korean won

1 208,22

ZAR

South African rand

12,9574

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8244

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6518

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 242,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0271

PHP

Philippine peso

49,163

RUB

Russian rouble

62,5738

THB

Thai baht

35,715

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4334

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3611

INR

Indian rupee

68,5150

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---