alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015411EN.01000201.xml

| 11.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 411/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 411/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 December 2015

(2015/C 411/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0943 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4609 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72350 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2761 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0806 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4370 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 316,61 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3389 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5030 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1940 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5000 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4817 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4813 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6191 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5338 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 287,37 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7143 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0416 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6290 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 262,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6599 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,688 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,3885 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,422 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1177 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6731 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,0416 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0943

JPY

Japanese yen

132,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4609

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72350

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2761

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0806

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4370

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

316,61

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3389

RON

Romanian leu

4,5030

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1940

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5000

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4817

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4813

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6191

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5338

KRW

South Korean won

1 287,37

ZAR

South African rand

16,7143

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0416

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6290

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 262,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6599

PHP

Philippine peso

51,688

RUB

Russian rouble

75,3885

THB

Thai baht

39,422

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1177

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6731

INR

Indian rupee

73,0416

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Order entered December 1, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00362-CV

NINA D. WHITE, Appellant

V.

GUADALUPE PADILLA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-08917

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 29, 2016 motion asking that the Court appoint 

counsel for her and extend the time to file an amended brief. This Court does not appoint 

counsel. We GRANT appellant’s motion to the extent that we extend the time to file an amended 

brief to DECEMBER 30, 2016.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
#### Carberry vs. Benson and others.

Where a judgment in foreclosure of a mortgage executed after chap. 195, Laws of 1859, took effect, did not contain a clause reserving to the mortgagor, and his assigns and subsequent incumbrancers, the right of redemption within one year from the sale, but attempted to bar such right from the date of the sale, this court, on appeal of the parties interested, directs the judgment to be modified by the insertion of such a clause. *Jones v. GiVnutn,*11- Wis., 150, followed.

The best evidence of the filing of a notice of *lis petndens*in a foreclosure action, is a copy of the notice certified by the register of deeds; but where the plaintiff introduced' in evidence *without objection*a notice in due form, with an affidavit of his attorney that a copy thereof was filed in the office of the register of deeds more than twenty days prior to the application for judgment, this was sufficient to sustain the judgment.

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for *Sheboygan*County.

Tbis appeal was. from, a judgment foreclosing a mortgage of real estate.

*J. A.*Bentley, for appellants.

*Wm. M.*Nichols, for respondent.

*By the Court,*

Cole, J.

In *Jones v.*Gilman, 14 Wis., 450, it was held that a judgment of foreclosure of -a mortgage executed after chapter 195, Laws of 1859, went into operation, should conform to tbe provisions of that act, and contain a clause giving tbe mortgagor, bis assigns' and subsequent in-cumbrancers, tbe right of redemption within one year from tbe sale. Tbe judgment in tbis case is absolute, or attempts to *490bar" this right from the date of the sale. The judgment should therefore be modified in this particular, so as to secure this right of redemption.

It is objected that no proof was made of filing notice of *lis pendens.*This objection is not sustained by the record. A proper notice of the pendency of the action was introduced without objection, accompanied by an affidavit of the attorney of the plaintiff, stating that a copy of such notice was filed in the office of the register of deeds more than twenty days prior to application for j udgment. Now conceding that this was not the best or highest proof of filing notice of *Us*pendens, but that a,copy of the notice certified by the register should have been produced, still, as it was not objected to on the trial, it was certainly sufficient.

The further objection that the judgment directs the payment of the whole mortgage debt when only a part is due, is not sustained by the record.

The judgment of the circuit court will be modified as before stated.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2855 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2855

       To extend authorization for livestock mandatory reporting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 27, 2021

  Ms. Stabenow (for herself and Mr. Boozman) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To extend authorization for livestock mandatory reporting.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIVESTOCK MANDATORY REPORTING EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 260 of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 
1946 (7 U.S.C. 1636i) is amended by striking ``September 30, 2020'' and 
inserting ``December 31, 2021''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 942 of the Livestock Mandatory 
Reporting Act of 1999 (7 U.S.C. 1635 note; Public Law 106-78) is 
amended by striking ``September 30, 2020'' and inserting ``December 31, 
2021''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


         KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, William P. Leiser
and J. Christopher Kirk and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him
and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000, and to sign any or all amendments to such
Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite
and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents
and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.




                                                /s/ H. Pryor Blackwell
                                                --------------------------------
                                                H. Pryor Blackwell
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mikel H. Williams,
President and Chief Executive Officer of DDi Corp. (the Company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period covered by the Report.



/S/    MIKEL H.
WILLIAMSMikel H. WilliamsPresident and Chief Executive Officer


Date: October 29, 2010
June 2, 2015 

Mr. Arvid Elias 

7001 Seaview Ave. 

Seattle, WA 98117 

Dear Mr. Elias: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 1, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2015-1384), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For 

us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1952

NICOLE YVETTE WINSTON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES; MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF 

HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. 

(1:16-cv-01795-JKB)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nicole Yvette Winston, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Nicole Yvette Winston appeals the district court’s order 

denying her motion for reconsideration and for discovery filed 

in her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Winston v. Md. Dep’t. of Human Res., No. 

1:16-cv-01795-JKB (D. Md. July 27, 2016). We deny Winston’s 

motion for transcript at government expense and dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Non‐governmental entities EPA met with to discuss the HCFC Phaseout since the D.C. Circuit 

Court denied EPA’s petition for rehearing (Jan. 21, 2011) through June 6, 2011: 

- Arkema, Inc. 

- DuPont Fluoroproducts 

- Honeywell 

- Hudson Technologies 

- ICOR International 

- National Refrigerants 

- Natural Resources Defense Council 

- Solvay Fluorides, LLC 

- Solvay Solexis, Inc.
# C_2016092EN.01000102.xml

| 9.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7945 — UTC/Riello Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 92/02)

On 2 March 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7945. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7945. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1





The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 are being “furnished” to the SEC rather than “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and are not to be incorporated by reference into the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





Certification of Chief Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)             the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended May 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 17, 2010
/s/  Bruce J. WoodBruce J. Wood

President and Chief Executive Officer








Certification of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)             the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended May 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 17, 2010
/s/  Joseph W. BatyJoseph W. Baty

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016148EN.01000101.xml

| 27.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 April 2016

(2016/C 148/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1287 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4418 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77483 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1545 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1000 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2278 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,027 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3799 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4747 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1951 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4600 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4276 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7545 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6417 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5280 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 299,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,3492 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3345 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4785 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 917,56 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4279 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,864 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,8948 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,708 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9943 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,7889 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,1373 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1287

JPY

Japanese yen

125,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4418

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77483

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1545

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1000

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2278

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,027

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3799

RON

Romanian leu

4,4747

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1951

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4600

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4276

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7545

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6417

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5280

KRW

South Korean won

1 299,14

ZAR

South African rand

16,3492

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3345

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4785

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 917,56

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4279

PHP

Philippine peso

52,864

RUB

Russian rouble

74,8948

THB

Thai baht

39,708

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9943

MXN

Mexican peso

19,7889

INR

Indian rupee

75,1373

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    EXHIBIT D


                      FORM OF ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                          First Union Direct Bank, N.A.

                  ---------------------------------------------

                      First Union MASTER CREDIT CARD TRUST

                  ---------------------------------------------

           The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of First Union
Direct Bank, N.A. ("First Union"), as Servicer pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of September 29, 1995 (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement") by and between First Union and the Bank of New York, as trustee (the
"Trustee") does hereby certify that:

           1.  First Union is Servicer under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement.

           2. The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee.

           3. This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.05 of the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

           4. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the twelve-month
period ended December 31, 1997 was conducted under the supervision of the
undersigned.

           5. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of the
knowledge of the undersigned, fully performed all its obligations under the
Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no default in the
performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
forth in paragraph 6 below.

           6. The following is a description of each default in the performance
of the Servicer's obligations under the provisions of the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, including any Supplement, known to the undersigned to have been made
during such period which sets forth in detail (i) the nature of each such
default, (ii) the action taken by the Servicer, if any, to remedy each such
default and (iii) the current status of each such default.

           NONE

           IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
certificate this 24th day of March, 1998.



                                                     /s/ JAMES H. GILBRAITH II
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     James H. Gilbraith II
                                                     Managing Director
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMAR LASHAWN TRAVILLION,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 266 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.