alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2310 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Petitioner ; ODC File Nos. C3-16-334, 340, 599, 661,
: and 662
v. : Attorney Registration No. 62355
ELIZABETH JENNIFER BARTOLAI (Luzerne County)
Respondent :
ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23" day of November, 2016, in the absence of a response to this
Court’s Rule to Show Cause why Respondent should not be placed on temporary
suspension, the Rule is made absolute. It is provided that:

1. Respondent is placed on temporary suspension until further definitive action
by this Court;

2. Respondent shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217;

3. The President Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County shall
enter such orders as may be necessary to protect the rights of Respondent's clients or
fiduciary entities with which she is involved, see Pa.R.D.E. 217(g); and

4. All financial institutions in which Respondent holds fiduciary funds shall freeze

such accounts pending further action.


Respondent's rights to petition for dissolution or amendment of this order and to
request accelerated disposition of charges underlying this order pursuant to Pa.R.D.E.
208(f)(6), are specifically preserved.

This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline pertaining to

confidentiality. See Pa.R.D.E. 402.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 2.10

                               February 15, 1999


Mr. Jerry E. Kimmel
6400 Cleburne Highway
Granbury, Texas 76107



Dear Mr. Kimmel:

     Reference is made to the Stock Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated
as of December 23, 1998, between you, Wingate Partners II, L.P. ("Wingate") and
Kevco, Inc. (the "Company"). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.

     As of the date hereof the Closing has not occurred and the conditions to
the obligations of Wingate set forth in Article IX of the Agreement have not
been fulfilled. In accordance with Section 13.1(b) of the Agreement, Wingate
hereby terminates the Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.


                                   Very Truly Yours,


                                   WINGATE PARTNERS II, L.P.

                                   By:  Wingate Management Company II, L.P.
                                        its general partner

                                   By:  Wingate Management Limited, L.L.C.
                                        its general partner

                                   By:  /s/ JAMES JOHNSON
                                        --------------------------------------
                                            James Johnson
                                            Principal
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40502

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MANUEL POMPA-TORRES,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-1077-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Manuel PompaTorres has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 

229 (5th Cir. 2011). Pompa-Torres has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 29, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40502 Document: 00513776176 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
No. 16-40502

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40502 Document: 00513776176 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TRACY THOMAS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 621 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 3rd day of June, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR 15d-14(a) OFTHE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

 

I,Richard C. Ill, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this annual reporton Form 10-K of Triumph Group, Inc.; and

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, this annualreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report.

 

 
| Dated:   July 29, 2010 |                                                                   |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                                   |
|                             | /s/  RICHARD C. ILL                                                    |
|                             | Richard  C. Ill                                                        |
| * *                         | *Chairman  and Chief Executive Officer (Principal  Executive Officer)* |

 

1

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 144 (Thursday, July 26, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 43806]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18394]

[[Page 43806]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Friday, August 3, 2012; 2:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: Via Teleconference, Public Dial In: 1-877-681-3374, Conference 
ID  4923945.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public, except where noted otherwise.

I. Program Planning

    Approval of the topics for the 2013 Statutory Report and two 
Briefing Reports--a single vote on the following package:
    (a) The topic of sexual assault in the military, as set forth in 
the concept paper prepared by Commissioner Kladney, for the 2013 
Statutory Report; and
    (b) The topic of EEOC's Conviction Records Policy, as set forth in 
the concept paper prepared by Commission Kirsanow, for a briefing 
report; and
    (c) The topic of the civil rights of veterans, as set forth in the 
concept paper prepared by Chairman Castro, for a briefing report.

IV. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: July 24, 2012.
Peter Minarik,
Acting RPCU Chief, Office of the Staff Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-18394 Filed 7-24-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
# C_2015253EN.01001101.xml

| 1.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/11

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 253/10)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

To celebrate thirty years of the EU flag, euro-area Finance Ministers decided that euro-area Member States would strike a 2-euro commemorative coin using a common design on the national side. Euro-area citizens and residents have selected by public web-voting the winning design. Voters had a choice of five designs, which had been pre-selected by a professional jury following a design competition among European Mints, and they choose the design created by Mr Georgios Stamatopoulos, professional designer at the Bank of Greece.

Issuing country
  : Slovakia

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 30th anniversary of the EU flag

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The designs shows the EU flag as a symbol that unites people and cultures with shared visions and ideals for a better common future. Twelve stars that morph into human figures are embracing the birth of a new Europe. At the top right, in semi-circle, are the issuing country ‘SLOVENSKO’ and the years ‘1985-2015’. At the right side, in between the flag and the years is the mint mark of the Kremnica Mint (Mincovňa Kremnica), consisting of the initials ‘MK’ placed between two dies. At the bottom right are the initials of the artist (Georgios Stamatopoulos).

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : September 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5



<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              APR-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAY-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                                38,833
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      1,986,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                         505,511
<INVENTORY>                                        3,338,360
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   5,271,695
<PP&E>                                             1,441,723
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (1,386,115)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     5,328,303
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              4,874,781
<BONDS>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                               4,419
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                           449,103
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       5,328,303
<SALES>                                            8,686,451
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   8,686,858
<CGS>                                              6,938,441
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      6,938,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   3,148,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   110,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (1,510,550)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (139,347)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (1,371,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (1,371,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (.31)



</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 19, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 19, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0122. IN THE INTEREST OF J. H., A CHILD (MOTHER).
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Juvenile Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 17JV0778
# C_2015351EN.01000101.xml

| 23.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7809 — Grosvenor/PSPIB/Real estate asset in Milan)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 351/01)

On 19 October 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7809. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7809. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00379

- CR

Brandon Wayne Russell

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 355th District Court

of Hood County (CR12391)

August 26, 2016

Opinion by J ustice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete

the $893.98 fine

. The sum of $893.98 shall also be removed from the order to

withdraw funds from appellant’s inmate trust account. It is ordered that the

judgment of the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Sue Walker

__________________ Justice Sue Walker
*Exhibit
      32.1*


**CERTIFICATION**


In
        connection
        with the annual report of Delta Financial Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
        10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
        Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Hugh Miller, Chief Executive Officer of
        the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of
        Title
        18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best
        of my
        knowledge:
 
 1.
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d), as
                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the Company
                  at the dates and for the periods
                  indicated.
  This
        Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission.
 
 Date:
        March 9, 2007
 
 /s/HUGH
          MILLER
 Hugh
          Miller
 President
          and
          Chief Executive Officer
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL AP PEALS OF TENNES SEE AT KNOXVI LLE A ssi gne d on Brie fs Jul y 28 , 200 9 STA TE OF TEN NES SEE v. RA ND Y JOE MC NEW Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sul livan Cou nty No. S51,902 R. Jerr y Beck, Judge

No. E2008-02189-CC A-R3- CD - Filed Oct ober 13, 2009

J OS EP H M. T I P TO N , P.J., concurring. I conc ur wi t h t h e m aj o rity opinion. I believe, though, that the state ment that the weight assig n ed t o ad v i s o ry en h an ce m en tan d m i t i g at i n g fa ct o rs n o l o n g erh as an ap p el l at e r ev i ew p ro v i s i on should not preclude suc h an as sessment relative to whether the sentenc e mee ts the principles and purposes of the Sentencing Ac t. That is, for example, using a five-ye ar old c onviction for spee ding to enhanc e an a ggravated burglary conviction to a maximum sentenc e may not meet the principles and purpose s of the Sentenc ing Act bec ause of inordinate we ight given to the speeding convic tion.

____________________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPTON, PRES IDIN G JUDGE
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
LEARNCOM, INC. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  540,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    328,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,131,666
<PP&E>                                         392,664
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,509
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,959,328
<BONDS>                                      2,513,182
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       757,625
<OTHER-SE>                                     226,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,959,328
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,090,651
<CGS>                                          417,984
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  672,667
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                41,608
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (45,859)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (260,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (260,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (260,950)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)



</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** January 30, 2 015 N o. 04
- 14
- 00719
- CV 04
- 14
- 00723
- CV THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION D.P. , As a Mentally Ill Person, From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014
- MH
- 3187 , 2014
- MH
- 3096 Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding 

### ORDER The Appellee ’ s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The appellee ’ s brief is due on February 20, 2015.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said cour t on this 30th day of January, 2015 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
CASHCALL, INC.; J. PAUL 

REDDAM, INDIVIDUALLY; 

WESTERN SKY FINANCIAL, 

LLC; MARTIN A. WEBB, 

INDIVIDUALLY; AND DOE, 

DOING BUSINESS AS WS 

FUNDING, LLC,

Petitioners,

v.

OFFICE OF FINANCIAL 

REGULATIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3438

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

Petition to Review Non-Final Agency Action.

Katherine E. Giddings and Thomas A. Range, Akerman LLP, Tallahassee; 

Christopher S. Carver, Akerman LLP, Miami, for Petitioners.

Scott R. Fransen, Assistant General Counsel, Office of Financial Regulation, 

Tallahassee; Jennifer Leigh Blakeman, Assistant General Counsel, Office of 

Financial Regulation, Orlando, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

ROBERTS, C.J., JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 22, 2016

No. 04-16-00691-CV

USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK,

Appellant

v.

Aaron J. WERLEIN,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-05487

Honorable Solomon Casseb, III, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was due to be filed in this appeal on November 17, 2016. On 

November 21, 2016, this court notified the trial court clerk that the clerk’s record was late. On 

November 22, 2016, the trial court clerk responded to our notice by stating that the clerk’s record 

has not been filed because appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s 

fee for preparing the record and that appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee. 

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant provide written proof to this court within ten 

(10) days of the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements 

have been made to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the 

clerk’s fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed 

for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b).

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court