alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-82,555-01

IN RE CURRY SHRONIE RICHARDSON, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO. 0661972-A

IN THE 263RD DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file an application for a writ of mandamus pursuant

to the original jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he filed an application for a writ of

habeas corpus in the 263rd District Court of Harris County, that more than 35 days have elapsed, and

that the application has not yet been forwarded to this Court. The district court entered an order

designating issues on February 6, 2012.

Respondent, the Judge of the 263rd District Court of Harris County, shall file a response with

this Court by having the District Clerk submit the record on such habeas corpus application. In the

alternative, Respondent may resolve the issues set out in the order designating issues and then have
-2-

the District Clerk submit the record on such application. In either case, Respondent’s answer shall

be submitted within 30 days of the date of this order. This application for leave to file a writ of

mandamus will be held in abeyance until Respondent has submitted his response.

Filed: January 28, 2015

Do not publish
EXHIBIT 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report of Top Image Systems Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gili Shalita, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date: June 23, 2010


/s/ Gili Shalita

——————————————

Name: Gili Shalita

Title: Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 58 (Thursday, March 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07048]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on March 30, 2015, at 
10:30 a.m., in Room 10800 at the Commission's headquarters building, to 
hear oral argument in cross-appeals by Francis V. Lorenzo and the 
Division of Enforcement from an initial decision of an administrative 
law judge.
    On December 31, 2013, the law judge found that Lorenzo violated the 
antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, 
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and Exchange Act 
Rule 10b-5 when he sent two potential investors emails containing false 
and misleading information about his firm's client. The law judge 
ordered Lorenzo to cease and desist from violations of the antifraud 
provisions, barred him from the securities industry, and ordered him to 
pay a civil money penalty of $15,000.
    The issues likely to be considered at oral argument include whether 
Lorenzo violated the antifraud provisions as alleged and, if so, the 
extent to which he should be sanctioned for those violations.
    The duty officer determined that no earlier notice thereof was 
possible. For further information, please contact the Office of the 
Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: March 24, 2015.
Brent J. Fields.
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07048 Filed 3-24-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2652 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify congressional 

intent and preserve patient access to home infusion therapy under the 

Medicare program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2021 

Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of South Carolina) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 

congressional intent and preserve patient access to home 

infusion therapy under the Medicare program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Preserving Patient Ac5 cess to Home Infusion Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2652 IS

1 SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF PATIENT ACCESS TO HOME IN2 FUSION THERAPY UNDER MEDICARE PRO3 GRAM. 

4 (a) INCLUSION OF PHARMACY SERVICES.—Section 

5 1861(iii)(2)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

6 1395x(iii)(2)(A)) is amended by inserting ‘‘and pharmacy 

7 services’’ after ‘‘nursing services’’. 

8 (b) INFUSION DRUG ADMINISTRATION CALENDAR

9 DAY.—Section 1834(u)(1)(A)(ii) of the Social Security 

10 Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(u)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended by insert11 ing after the first sentence the following new sentence: 

12 ‘‘For purposes of the previous sentence, with respect to 

13 the furnishing of home infusion drugs to an individual by 

14 a qualified home infusion therapy supplier, a reference to 

15 payment to such supplier for an infusion drug administra16 tion calendar day in the home of such individual shall refer 

17 to payment for the date on which such a drug was admin18 istered to the individual (regardless of whether a qualified 

19 home infusion therapy supplier was physically present in 

20 the home of such individual on such date).’’. 

21 (c) PERMITTING NURSE PRACTITIONERS AND PHYSI22 CIAN ASSISTANTS TO ESTABLISH AND REVIEW A HOME

23 INFUSION PLAN OF CARE.—Section 1861(iii)(1)(B) of the 

24 Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(iii)(1)(B)) is 

25 amended by striking ‘‘physician (as defined in subsection 

26 (r)(1)) and is periodically reviewed by a physician’’ and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2652 IS

1 inserting ‘‘physician (as defined in subsection (r)(1)) or 

2 a nurse practitioner or physician assistant (as those terms 

3 are defined in subsection (aa)(5)) and is periodically re4 viewed by a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician as5 sistant’’. 

6 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply with respect to items and services 

8 furnished on or after January 1, 2022. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Order entered October 7, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05 - 20 - 00127 - CV MATTHEW SIDWELL, Appellant

V. ZUO MODERN CONTEMPORARY, INC., Appellee On Appeal from th e County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC - 17 - 03192 - E

ORDER Before the Court is appellant’s fifth motion for extension of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief be filed no later than November 4 , 2 020 . As the brief was first du e June 4, 2020, we caution appellant that failure to file his brief by November 4 th may result in the appeal being dismissed without further notice. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c).

/s/ KEN MOLBERG JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06674]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 17, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Kentucky Bancshares, Inc., Paris, Kentucky; to acquire 100 
percent of the voting shares of Madison Financial Corp., and thereby 
indirectly acquire voting shares of Madison Bank, both in Richmond, 
Kentucky.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Minier Financial, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan with 401(k) 
Provisions, Minier, Illinois; to acquire additional voting shares, for 
a total of 51 percent of the voting shares of Minier Financial, Inc., 
and thereby indirectly acquire additional voting shares of First 
Farmers State Bank, both in Minier, Illinois.
    2. Wintrust Financial Corporation, Rosemont, Illinois; to merge 
with Community Financial Shares, Inc., Glen Ellyn, Illinois, and 
thereby indirectly acquire Community Bank-Wheaton/Glen Ellyn, Illinois.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 19, 
2015.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-06674 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: November 15, 2010   /s/ Charles E. MooreCharles E. Moore
President and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
PJ America's proforma combined financial statements for the years ended December
29, 1996 and December 31, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                    YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-29-1996            DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                            JAN-01-1996            DEC-26-1994
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-29-1996            DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      3,660,843                478,459
<SECURITIES>                               12,057,972                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  20,624                 33,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0                      0
<INVENTORY>                                   189,078                136,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           16,338,787                937,280
<PP&E>                                      7,305,188              5,984,999
<DEPRECIATION>                            (2,061,138)            (1,195,583)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             22,373,321              6,344,722
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       1,724,601                863,601
<BONDS>                                             0              1,708,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0                      0
<PREFERRED>                                         0                      0
<COMMON>                                       47,550                  5,085
<OTHER-SE>                                 20,529,990              2,271,451
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               22,373,321              6,344,722
<SALES>                                    30,264,352             23,099,050
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           30,264,352             23,099,050
<CGS>                                      10,115,854              7,827,113
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              15,834,066             12,194,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            1,633,812              1,042,714
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             86,723                234,798
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,553,315              1,813,242
<INCOME-TAX>                                  912,514                661,833
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         1,640,801              1,151,409
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0                      0
<CHANGES>                                           0                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,640,801              1,151,409
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.48                   0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.48                   0.37


</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

October 24, 2023.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00734-CV

IN RE COMPASS RE TEXAS, LLC; HANK JEANS; AND EVA MARIE 

JEANS, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-07105

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 5, 2023, relators Compass Re Texas, LLC; Hank Jeans; and Eva 

Marie Jeans filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code 

Ann. § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this court to 
2

compel the Honorable Rabeea Sultan Collier, presiding judge of the 113th District 

Court of Harris County, to vacate her June 30, 2023 orders denying relators’ motions

(1) for leave to designate responsible third party and (2) to strike real parties

interest’s response.

On October 13, 2023, relators advised the court that the parties had reached a

settlement of all claims at mediation and relators were withdrawing their petition for 

writ of mandamus and motion for emergency stay as moot.

Accordingly, we dismiss relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and motion 

for emergency stay for want of jurisdiction. 

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Spain, and Wilson.
# C_2015400EN.01000101.xml

| 2.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 400/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 400/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7828 — Ineos / DEA UK E&P Holdings)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 400/01)

On 26 November 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7828. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7828. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016336EN.01000201.xml

| 13.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 336/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 336/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 September 2016

(2016/C 336/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1226 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 114,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4434 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84475 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5587 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0935 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2713 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,024 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,98 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3494 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4499 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3473 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4930 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4722 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7091 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5350 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5277 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 252,33 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,2563 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4995 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4860 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 705,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6370 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,383 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,0373 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,145 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6931 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,4395 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,1105 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1226

JPY

Japanese yen

114,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4434

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84475

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5587

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0935

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2713

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,024

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,98

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3494

RON

Romanian leu

4,4499

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3473

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4930

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4722

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7091

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5350

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5277

KRW

South Korean won

1 252,33

ZAR

South African rand

16,2563

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4995

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4860

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 705,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6370

PHP

Philippine peso

53,383

RUB

Russian rouble

73,0373

THB

Thai baht

39,145

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6931

MXN

Mexican peso

21,4395

INR

Indian rupee

75,1105

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Order filed, December 01, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00861-CR

____________

JONATHAN BERRING, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1516562

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 14, 2016. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Mattie Kimble, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
# C_2016187EN.01002001.xml

| 26.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/20

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

(2016/C 187/05)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| | EPSO/AD/323/16 — INVESTIGATORS (AD 7) for the following profiles:

  1 — Investigators: EU expenditure, anti-corruption

  2 — Investigators: Customs and trade, tobacco and counterfeit goods |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/323/16 — INVESTIGATORS (AD 7) for the following profiles:

1 — Investigators: EU expenditure, anti-corruption

1 — Investigators

2 — Investigators: Customs and trade, tobacco and counterfeit goods

2 — Investigators

| | EPSO/AD/324/16 — INVESTIGATORS (AD 9): Team leaders |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/324/16 — INVESTIGATORS (AD 9): Team leaders

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in
  Official Journal of the European Union C 187 A of 26 May 2016.

Official Journal of the European Union

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
#### Lane and others vs. White.

A motion made in October, 1859, to set aside a sale reported by the sheriff; on the ground that the sale “ was irregular,” without specifying in what the irregularity consisted, was properly denied, the 22nd of the circuit court rules then in force requiring that when a motion was made for irregularity, the notice or order should specify the irregularity complained of.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Fond du Lae*County.

The case is stated sufficiently in the opinion of the court.

*B. P. Baton,*for appellant.

*B. S. Bragg,*for respondent.

December 30.

*By the Court,*

Paine, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to set aside a sale reported by the sheriff, and to confirm a sale which, it was claimed, the sheriff had previously made to another party. The motion was denied by the court below, for the reason that the notice did not sufficiently specify the grounds of the motion, with leave however to renew it on payment of five dollars costs. The motion to set aside the sale was made “ because the sale and deed to Hayes were irregular,” but without specifying in what the irregularity consisted. Rule 22 of the Circuit Court Rules in force at the time, provided that when a motion was made for irregularity, *“*the notice or order shall *586specify tRe irregularity complained of.” TRe notice in tRis case made no attempt to comply witR tRis requirement, and tRe court Relow was clearly rigRt in denying it upon tRat ground.

TRe order is affirmed, witR costs.