alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31 (a)
                                  CERTIFICATION

     I, Bruce J. Haber, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Emergent Group Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in
     order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
     which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
     covered by this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining "disclosure controls and procedures" for the
     registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual
          report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of the registrant's board of directors:

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   The registrant's othe certifying officer and I have indicated in this
     annual report whether there were significant changes i internal controls or
     in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
     subsequent t the date of our most recent evaluation, including any
     corrective actions with regard to significant eficiencies and material
     weaknesses.



Dated: March 29, 2005                 /s/ BRUCE J. HABER
                                          --------------
                                          Bruce J. Haber
                                          Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GERARD MORRISON and

BARBARA MORRISON,

Appellants,

v.

THE LEGACY REALTY,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00044-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law

of Bastrop County, Texas

(TC# 22-21581)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This appeal is before the Court on its own motion to determine whether it should be 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.

1 Finding that Appellants have failed to file a brief or a motion 

for extension of time to file the brief, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

On April 6, 2023, the Clerk of this Court notified Appellants by letter that the brief was 

past due and no motion for extension of time had been filed. The letter advised Appellants that the 

Court intended to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless Appellants responded within 

ten days and showed grounds for continuing the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellants 

1 This case was transferred from the Third Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the 

Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. We follow the precedent of the Third Court of Appeals 

to the extent it might conflict with our own. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
2

have not filed the brief, an extension motion, or any response to the Court’s inquiry. Accordingly, 

we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

April 21, 2023 

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, J.J.
1 

### Stout, Alan

From: Stout, Alan Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 8:19 AM To: 'Gordon, Jason@ARB' Subject: RE: Tier 3 dual fuel?

Jason, Your approach is correct. It’s probably best to cl ear that up by combining the last two sentences wit h a semi-colon to make clear that the no-additional-testing provision applies for gasoline-ethanol FFVs (since we want a single test at the worst-case blend). We may want to add some words t o deal with test requirements for CNG and/or LPG co mbinations, but I’m not sure we need to cover every possible pe rmutation.

Alan

From: Gordon, Jason@ARB [ mailto:jgordon@arb.ca.gov ]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 9:14 PM
To: Stout, Alan Subject: Tier 3 dual fuel?

Hi Allen, I have a simple question to ask you (I hope). For Tier 3, would a dual fuel vehicle need to meet evap orative emission standard for the non-gasoline fuel type, even thoug h use the gasoline test value would be used for the fleet average? I am pretty sure the answer is yes (from the first se ntence below), but I was thrown off just a bit by t he last sentence of the CFR excerpt below.



### § 86.1810-17 General standards; increase in emissio ns; unsafe condition; waivers. (h) Multi-fueled vehicles (including dual-fueled an d flexible-fueled vehicles) shall comply with all requirements established for each c onsumed fuel (or blend of fuels in the case of flexible fueled vehicles). In the case of f lexible-fueled vehicles operating on ethanol and gasoline, this involves additional exha ust emission measurements using the fuel specified in 40 CFR 1065.725. No additional ev aporative emission testing is required.

Thank you for your help with answering my questions

. Jason
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Terrilee 97th Street LLC, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Naema Alaharzi, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent, - and - "John Doe" and "Jane Doe," Respondents-Undertenants.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Landlord, as limited by its briefs, appeals from so much of a final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Cheryl J. Gonzales, J. ), entered on or about January 9, 2015, after a nonjury trial, which dismissed the petition in a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Final judgment (Cheryl J. Gonzales, J.), entered on or about January 9, 2015, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $25 costs. </p><p>A fair interpretation of the evidence supports the dismissal after trial of this chronic rent delinquency holdover petition. While the record shows that tenant's defaults in paying her share of the rent led to the commencement of nine nonpayment proceedings over a sixteen year period, only two proceedings were commenced since 2009, tenant received abatements of rent in at least five of the proceedings, and two were settled by stipulations requiring landlord to make repairs or cure violations. Thus, landlord failed to establish a pattern of unjustified rent defaults on the tenant's part sufficient to constitute a violation of a substantial obligation of the tenancy (<i>see </i>Rent Stabilization Code [9 NYCRR] ยง2524.3[a]). Where, as here, bona fide claims are shown to exist that an apartment is in need of repairs, precipitating the withholding of rent, a holdover petition based upon chronic nonpayment will not lie (<a href="../2005/2005_51764.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Hudson St. Equities v Circhi</i>, 9 Misc 3d 138</a>[A], 2005 NY Slip Op 51764[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2005]; <a href="../2012/2012_22255.htm" target="_blank"><i>see also Chama Holding Corp. v Taylor</i>, 37 Misc 3d 70</a> [App Term, 1st Dept 2012]). THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: November 29, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Service Administration

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anyone requesting information regarding the ACICBL should contact Dr. Joan Weiss, Designated Federal Official within the Bureau of Health Workforce, Health Resources and Services Administration, in one of three ways: (1) Send a request to the following address: Dr. Joan Weiss, Designated Federal Official, Bureau of Health Workforce, Health Resources and Services Administration, Parklawn Building, Room 12C-05, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857; (2) call (301) 443-0430; or (3) send an email to *jweiss@hrsa.gov.*

Jackie Painter, 

Director, Division of the Executive Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. 2015-07154 Filed 3-27-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     US

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         118,494
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  31,298
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               247,587
<PP&E>                                         639,572
<DEPRECIATION>                                 65,650
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,070,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          898,061
<BONDS>                                        664,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       8,122
<OTHER-SE>                                     (499,863)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,070,763
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1,494,546
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  734,593
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,537,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             20,529
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (702,329)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (702,329)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (702,329)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.11)


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 10.64**

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

** **

**PURCHASE AND SALECONTRACT**

** **

** **

** **

***BETWEEN***

** **

** **

** **

**CCIP KNOLLS,L.L.C.,**

**a Delaware limited liabilitycompany**

** **

** **

** **

***AS SELLER***

*** ***

*** ***

*** ***

*** ***

*** ***

*** ***

***AND***

** **

** **

** **

** **

**HAMILTON ZANZE &COMPANY,**

**a Californiacorporation**

** **

** **

** **

***AS PURCHASER***

** **

** **

**The Knolls**
# C_2015170EN.01000101.xml

| 23.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 170/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 170/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7550 — CRH/Holcim Lafarge Divestment Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 170/01)

On 24 April 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7550. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7550. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 9, 2022

No. 04-22-00001-CV

IN RE Jordan HOPPE, Relator(s)

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 4, 2022, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. On January 14, 2022, 

the real party in interest filed a response. After considering the petition, the appendix, and the 

response, this court concludes relator has not shown herself to be entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

It is so ORDERED on March 9, 2022.

_____________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 9th day of March, 2022.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1

This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CI-02605, styled In the Interest of M.H. and A.H., pending in the 73rd 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Antonia Arteaga presiding.
# C_2016092EN.01000201.xml

| 9.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 March 2016

(2016/C 92/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1028 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4614 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77608 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3728 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0952 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4285 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,058 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,19 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3275 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4651 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2180 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4794 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4695 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5656 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6302 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5259 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 329,87 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9485 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1744 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5776 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 494,10 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5327 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,773 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 79,0929 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,028 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1690 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6437 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,2265 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1028

JPY

Japanese yen

124,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4614

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77608

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3728

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0952

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4285

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,058

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,19

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3275

RON

Romanian leu

4,4651

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2180

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4794

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4695

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5656

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6302

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5259

KRW

South Korean won

1 329,87

ZAR

South African rand

16,9485

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1744

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5776

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 494,10

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5327

PHP

Philippine peso

51,773

RUB

Russian rouble

79,0929

THB

Thai baht

39,028

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1690

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6437

INR

Indian rupee

74,2265

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001022174
<NAME> CLASS B
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                      30,682,976
<SECURITIES>                                13,616,310
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            48,842,564
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              48,842,564
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,109,771
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,732,793
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                48,842,564
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           (1,045,642)
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,361,761
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,407,403)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,407,403)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,407,403)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (370.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (370.99)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM TCI
SATELLITE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.'S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           6,084
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,386
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,307
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       1,399,040
<DEPRECIATION>                                 277,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,204,856
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        418,729
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,704
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,204,856
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,990
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  283,592
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               243,642
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,992
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (238,341)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (238,341)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (238,341)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.58)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6914

KENNETH SYNCERE RIVERA, a/k/a Kenneth D. Rivera, a/k/a 

Kenneth Rivera,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SCOTT BODIFORD, Jail Administrator; LIEUTENANT TURNER, 

S.H.U. Lt.,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Anderson. J. Michelle Childs, District 

Judge. (8:15-cv-03272-JMC)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Syncere Rivera, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Syncere Rivera appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rivera 

v. Bodiford, No. 8:15-cv-03272-JMC (D.S.C. June 15, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED