alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 24.6

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes
and appoints Asuka Nakahara and William P. Leiser the true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him
and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1997, and to sign any or all amendments to
such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, each of them
with or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each
and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the
premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney or
attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their substitute or substitutes may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

                                   /s/ ROWLAND T. MORIARITY
                                   ----------------------------------
                                   Rowland T. Moriarity


Dated:    March 31, 1998
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                    INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Liberty Satellite & Technology, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-18167, 333-35454, and 333-48770) on Form S-8 of Liberty Satellite &
Technology, Inc. of our report dated February 12, 2003, except as to Notes 9
and 21 to the consolidated financial statements, which are as of March 28,
2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Liberty Satellite &
Technology, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss,
stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Liberty Satellite & Technology, Inc.

Our reports refer to a change in the method of accounting for goodwill in 2002.


                                        KPMG LLP

Denver, Colorado
March 28, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 7, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *John E. Boyer, individually and as trustee of the Merlyn Boyer Irrevocable GST Trust, the John E. Boyer Grandchildren's Trust, the Emily Ryan Boyer Irrevocable Trust, and the Jack Eric Boyer Irrevocable Trust, all of Kingman, Kansas; and Emily Boyer, Kingman, Kansas, as a member of The Boyer Family Group;*                     to retain voting shares of KANZA Financial Corporation, parent of KANZA Bank, both in Kingman, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 18, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-06561 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors

Tumbleweed Communications Corp.:

    We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-84683) on Form S-8 of Tumbleweed Communications Corp. of our report dated
January 17, 2000, except as to Note 10, which is as of January 31, 2000,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Tumbleweed Communications Corp.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999 and 1998, and the related consolidated
statement of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1999, which report appears in
the December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of Tumbleweed Communications
Corp.

                                             /s/ KPMG LLP

San Francisco, California
March 30, 2000
1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

GWEN M. ROWLING,

 

 Appellant,

v.

HARRY H. ROWLING,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00297-CV

Appeal from the

41st District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2015DCV-0770)

O R D E R

Appellant filed in the trial court, and contemporaneous with her pro se notice of appeal, 

an affidavit of indigence. Appellant asserts that she is unable to pay for the clerk’s record and 

reporter’s record on appeal. Appellee filed a contest as permitted under the former rules, rather 

than a motion filed pursuant to the current version of TEX.R.CIV.P. 145(f)(1). See TEX.R.CIV.P.

145(f)(1)(permitting a party to challenge Statement of Inability by filing a motion and setting 

forth requirements of the motion). The District Clerk filed the Clerk’s Record containing the 

affidavit of indigence and the contest. 

With the recent amendments of TEX.R.CIV.P. 145 and TEX.R.APP.P. 20.1, the Texas 

Supreme Court made significant changes to the procedures for determining whether a party can 

be required to pay costs in the trial court and on appeal. Rule 145 governs a party’s claim that 

the party is unable to afford costs for preparation of the appellate record. TEX.R.CIV.P. 145; 
2

TEX.R.APP.P. 20.1, cmt. We conclude that it is necessary for the trial court to conduct a hearing 

as contemplated by Rule 145.

It is therefore ordered that the trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether 

Appellant is able to afford to pay for the appellate record. The hearing should be conducted as 

soon as practicable, but Appellant must be given ten days’ notice of the hearing. See

TEX.R.CIV.P. 145. The trial court should address whether Appellee’s contest meets the 

requirements of Rule 145(f)(1). See In the Interest of A.M., --- S.W.3d ---. 2016 WL 6835727 

(Tex.App.--El Paso November 21, 2016).

The trial court must issue an order which complies with TEX.R.CIV.P. 145(f)(6). In the 

event that the trial court finds that Appellant can afford to pay costs, Appellant can challenge that 

ruling by motion filed in this Court pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 145(g) no later than ten days after 

the order is signed. The trial court shall forward its order to the District Clerk of El Paso County, 

Texas as soon as practicable after the hearing, but no later than three days after the order is 

signed. The District Clerk shall prepare and forward a supplemental clerk’s record containing the 

order to this Court as soon as possible, but no later than five days after the trial court files the 

order. It will not be necessary for the court reporter to file a record of the hearing unless the trial 

court rules that Appellant is able to afford to pay for the appellate record. All appellate deadlines 

shall be suspended pending resolution of these issues. The Court will issue an order 

reestablishing the appellate deadlines.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 2

nd day of December, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 24-8


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, William P.
Leiser and J. Christopher Kirk and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000, and to sign any or all amendments to
such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or
without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or
their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.


                                        /s/ Henry J. Faison
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Henry J. Faison
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1823

___________ David G. Jeep, * * Appellant, * * v. * * Jack A. Bennett, Associate Circuit * Judge, Camden County; Devin M. * Appeal from the United States Ledom, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, * District Court for the Camden County; Alex Little, Police * Western District of Missouri. Officer, #920, City of Osage Beach; * Tim Taylor, Police Officer, #913, City * of Osage Beach; W. Steven Rives, * [UNPUBLISHED] Prosecuting Attorney; W. James * Icenogle, Prosecuting Attorney; Bruce * Colyer, Associate Circuit Judge; Jay * Nixon, Attorney General, State of * Missouri; Camden County; City of * Osage Beach; State of Missouri, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: October 6, 2008 Filed: October 10, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, SMITH, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2- PER CURIAM. David Jeep appeals the district court’s 1 orders dismissing his claims against multiple defendants and granting summary judgment to the remaining defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. After careful re view, we conclude that the orders were proper for the reasons stated by the districtcourt and that an extended discussion is not warranted. See Maness v. Dist. Court , 495 F.3d 943, 943-44 (8th Cir. 2007) (per curiam) (de novo review of dismissals based on immunity); Rouse v. Benson , 193 F.3d 936, 939 (8th Cir. 1999) (district court’s grant of summary judgment reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court, see 8th Cir. R. 47B, and we deny as moot Jeep’s motion for an expedited appeal.

______________________________
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 and Form F-3 ( No. 333-101990, No.
333-119885 and No. 333-125064) of our reports dated April 3, 2008 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Top Image Systems Ltd. as of December 31, 2007,
included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Top Image Systems Ltd. for the year ended
December 31, 2007.

|                 |                                 
|---------------- | --------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|                 | /s/ Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
|Tel-Aviv, Israel | Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer    
|April 3, 2008    | A Member of Ernst & Young Global



---

---
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 8
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 8
 

 

EPA SANITIZED
Page 6 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 8
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 8
# C_2016265EN.01000201.xml

| 21.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 265/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 265/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 July 2016

(2016/C 265/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1013 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 117,33 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4384 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,83605 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4684 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0882 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3552 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,022 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,05 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3758 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4741 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3463 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4712 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4382 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5405 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5658 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4962 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 257,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,7296 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3501 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4855 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 433,83 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4456 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,917 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,7877 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,583 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5761 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,3683 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,0123 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1013

JPY

Japanese yen

117,33

DKK

Danish krone

7,4384

GBP

Pound sterling

0,83605

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4684

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0882

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3552

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,022

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,05

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3758

RON

Romanian leu

4,4741

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3463

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4712

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4382

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5405

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5658

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4962

KRW

South Korean won

1 257,06

ZAR

South African rand

15,7296

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3501

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4855

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 433,83

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4456

PHP

Philippine peso

51,917

RUB

Russian rouble

69,7877

THB

Thai baht

38,583

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5761

MXN

Mexican peso

20,3683

INR

Indian rupee

74,0123

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Gloria Lawrence, Appellant, v Shazriar Sotudeh, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 590]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (DiBlasi, J.), dated December 10, 2002, which dismissed the complaint upon the plaintiffs failure to appear at a status conference as directed by a prior court order.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent.

No appeal lies from an order made upon the default of the appealing party *(see*CPLR 5511; *Kandel v Hoffman,*309 AD2d 904 [2003]). The proper procedure would have been for the plaintiff to move to open her default and to vacate the order dated December 10, 2002, and if necessary, appeal from the denial of the motion to vacate *(see Grober v Busigo,*133 AD2d 389 [1987]; *Imor v Imor,*114 AD2d 552, 553 [1985]). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1



                                                                    Exhibit 20.2

                             SERVICERS' CERTIFICATE

                             AFCO CREDIT CORPORATION

                           AFCO ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

                  MELLON BANK PREMIUM FINANCE LOAN MASTER TRUST


                  The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of AFCO
Credit Corporation and AFCO Acceptance Corporation (jointly "AFCO"), as
Servicer, pursuant to Section 3.5 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of December 1, 1996 (as amended, the "Agreement"), among Mellon Bank, N.A.,
as Transferor, AFCO Credit Corporation, as Servicer, AFCO Acceptance
Corporation, as Servicer, Premium Financing Specialists, Inc., as Back-up
Servicer, Premium Financing Specialists of California, Inc., as Back-up Servicer
and The First National Bank of Chicago, as Trustee, does hereby certify that:

         1.       AFCO is, as of the date hereof, Servicer under the Agreement.
                  Capitalized terms used in this Certificate have their
                  respective meanings as set forth in the Agreement.

         2.       The undersigned is a Servicing Officer who is duly authorized
                  pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this
                  Certificate to Trustee.

         3.       A review of the activities of Servicer during the fiscal year
                  ended December 31, 1998, and of its performance under the
                  Agreement was conducted under my supervision.

         4.       Based on such review, Servicer has, to the best of my
                  knowledge, performed in all material respects its obligations
                  under the Agreement throughout such year and no default in the
                  performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing.

                  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate this 26th day of March, 1999.

                                       AFCO CREDIT CORPORATION, as Servicer


                                       By      C. LEONARD O'CONNELL
                                           -------------------------------
                                            Name:  C. Leonard O'Connell
                                            Title: Senior Vice President, 
                                                   Treasurer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



                                       AFCO ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, as Servicer


                                       By      C. LEONARD O'CONNELL
                                           -------------------------------
                                            Name:  C. Leonard O'Connell
                                            Title: Senior Vice President, 
                                                   Treasurer and
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
Opinion issued March 11 , 2021

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 20
- 00756
- CV

——————————— LINDA WEST, INDIVIDUALLY AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARY OF ROBERT WEST , JR. DECEASED AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE

OF ROBERT WEST JR. , Appella nt

V. IRA H. LIEBER, M.D., LIEBER
- MOORE CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES,
- P.A. , AND TEXAS CARDIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF HOUSTON , Appell e e s

On Appeal from the 215th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Ca se No. 2018
- 78506

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant has filed an unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal of her appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.2(a). The Court has not yet issued a decision in this appeal.2

Accordingly, we grant appellant’s motion and dismiss the appeal

. We dismiss any pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Landau, and Hightower.
UASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com April 16, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Bldg. 10A

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

RE: Summary Grant for Elevated Horizons, LLC Exemption Request Under

Section 333 of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Modernization and

Reform Act of 2012 , 4 9 U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

Dear Sir or M adam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA)

, 49

U.S.C. § 44701(f), and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Elevated Horizons, LLC. (Elevated Horizons),

an agricultural imaging service company and operator of small Unmanned Aircraft

System s ( s UAS), seeks an exemption from the following listed Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR) to allow commercial operation of the DJI Spreading Wings S 1000

(S 1000 ) within the National Airspace System (NAS) for controlled, low

- risk, precision

agricultural aerial mapping and surveying

.

Elevated Horizons, in the accompanying petition, seeks exempt ion from the requirements

of 14 C.F.R. §§ 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b), 91.7(a), 91.105, 91.119(c), 91.121

, 91.151(b)

, 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and ( 2 ),and 91.417(a) and (b)

.

Elevated Horizons has requested that the FAA not request public comment on its petition

because it would not set a ny precedent and because the relief requested is identical to

exemptions granted previously. 14 C.F.R. § 11.87.

In addition, Elevated Horizons will be utilizing the s ame DJI proven technologies the FAA

h as already accepted and approved for numerous other Section 333 exemptions.

Moreover, Elevated Horizons provides an enhanced level of safety over other approved

uses of DJI products in that, the proposed precision agriculture operations occur over

specific remote fields in rural areas.

Finally, Elevated Horizon’s package accompanying the Section 333 P etition for

E xemption is robust, thorough

, and comprehensive

, and along with the published S 1000

manuals, includes a Proprietary Standard Operating Procedure s (SOP) and MaintenanceUASolutions Group, Inc. www.uasolutionsgroup.com

2518 Auburn Drive, Cocoa, FL 32926 ( 321 )

- 261

- 2547

uasolutionsgroup@uasolutionsgroup.com Manual

.

All of the appropriate documentation to accompany Elevated Horizons Sec tion 333

Petition is included. Combined, this comp rehensive package, and the approvals the FAA

has already given to DJI products and th e technology, should provide the support

necessary to the FAA for a S ummary G rant of Elevated Horizons Section 333 Petition

and expedite the process.

Kelly J. Neubecker

CEO

UASolutions Group, Inc.

CC:

Jim Williams

Jo e Morra

Jake Troutman

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Robert Papas