alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 30, 2016

NO. 03-16-00635-CV

Elizabeth Chavez, Appellant

v.

Mario Alberto Alvarez, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the order signed by the district court on August 26, 2016. Appellant has

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the 

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal. 

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of EYI Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-2 for the quarter ended June 30th, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1.        The Report fully complies with
  the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
  1934; and

2.        The information contained in
  the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
  and results of operation of the Company.

|Date:            October 7
      th, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Jay Sargeant       
|----------------------------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                                          | Name:  | Jay Sargeant           
|                                          | Title: | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
  document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
  that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
  required by Section 906, has been provided to EYI Industries, Inc. and will
  be retained by EYI Industries, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
  Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.1



 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


October 13, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 537 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon
is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trust (the “Trust”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on October 12, 2021, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New
York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-258217) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trust and to the filing of this
consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                          


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
#### Northrup vs. Shephard, impleaded, etc.

*Jurisdiction*— Service *of summons*— Amendment *of sheriff’s retwrn*— Practice *as to motions.*

1. Where the sheriff’s return shows service of summons by copy left at defendant’s residence with a person of suitable age, etc., but not that defendant himself was *not found,*it does not show that jurisdiction was obtained of his person.

2. The judgment in such a case may be set aside on defendant’s motion.

8. The sheriff should, however, be permitted, on plaintiff’s motion, to amend his return so as to show due service, and the motion to set aside should then be denied.

*5144. Where one of several defendants moves generally to set aside “the judgment in the action,” it should still be set aside *as to him,*if he is otherwise entitled to that relief.

APPEAL from the Circuit Oourt for *Rook*County.

This was a motion to set aside a judgment by default. The grounds of the motion are stated in the opinion.

*Todd & Converse,*for appellant. '

*Kfoggle*c6 *Castle,*for respondent.

Paine, J.

According to the rule that has been established by the decisions of this court, the record in the court below did not show any jurisdiction of the defendant *Shephard.*The return of the sheriff showed service only by leaving a copy of the summons at *Shephard's*residence, with a person of suitable age and discretion, but did not show that *Shephard*himself was not found, in which case only is the service made a legal one. *Knox v. Miller,*18 Wis. 397.

The judgment was therefore irregular and unwarranted on the face of the record, and the defendant was entitled to have it set aside, on motion, for such irregularity.

It is very probable that the sheriff might have amended his return in accordance with the fact, so as to have shown a good service. If such an offer had been made, the court should have allowed the amendment, and then have denied the motion to set aside the judgment. But without such an amendment, the motion should have been granted.

The motion was made by the defendant *Shephard*alone. Its plain object was, to set aside the judgment as against him. And the fact that the language was general, asking to set aside *“*the judgment in the action,” is no reason why he was not entitled to have it set aside as to him. A party by asking too much does not preclude himself from obtaining that to which he shows himself entitled.

*By the Court.*— The order appealed from is reversed, with costs, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
**Docket No. FAA -**  **2011 -**  **1253**
**U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY**



# Farm, Ranch, and Rural Communities

**Committee (FRRCC)**  **MEETING AGENDA**  **October 26 -**  **27, 2011**  **Sheraton National Hotel 900 South Orme Street**  **Arlington, VA 22204**  **Galaxy Ballroom**

**Wedne sday, October 26, 2011**  **8:00 am**  **REGISTRATION 8:30**  **Call to Orde r /**  **Discussion of Meeting Agenda and Committee** 

**Process**
 **Alicia Kaiser**, FRRCC Designated Federal Officer
 **Steven Balling** , FRRCC Chair
 **Lawrence Elworth** , Agricul tu ral Counsel or to the Administrator, EPA
 **Cynthia Jones -**  **Jackson** , Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach, EPA
 **Abby Dilley** , FRRCC Facil itator **9:00 Updates from EPA Ag**  **ricultural Counselor**  **Lawrence Elworth**  **9:30 Workg**  **roups Session: Convene and Prepare to Present**  **Draft**

**Workgroup Report** **s and Recommendations**  **10:00 Plenary: Present**  **and Discuss Draft**  **Workg roup Reports**  **and**

**Recommendations 11:3** **0 Plenary: Discuss**  **Intersecting Recommendations**  **12: 0** **0 pm**  **Working Lunch 12:3** **0 Workgroup Session** **2:3 0**  **Plenary: Discuss Re** **vised Recommendations and Workgroup Reports**

**4: 0** **0 Public Comment**  **4:30 Plenary: Discuss**  **Next Steps for Advancing Recommendations 6**  **:00 Adjourn**  **Thursday, October 27, 2011 8:00**  **am REGISTRATION**  **8:30 Call to Orde**  **r / Review Meeting Agenda for the Day 8:45**  **Plenary: Updates from Drafting Groups**  **/ Review**  **and Discuss New** 

**Recommendations Language 10:30**  **Break 10:45**  **Plenary: Review and Develop the Executive Summary**  **11:4 5**  **Working Lunch 12:00**  **pm Public Comment**  **12:30 Plenary: Discuss Next Steps**  **and Completion**  **and Submission of** 

**Report 1:00**  **Adjourn**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JERRY RANSOME,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 300 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
**OFFICE OF**  **l-NE AITORNEY**  **QENRRAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** ITonQnllle w. Lee 

### O’l)anlol, pa&w 

### 4

prorid I Artiolo 1007, Ootlo of Qrlniiml Prooodurm of Towo,

ìTh a C b o t o r n orMI o ifor l 

### mar6 ior tho qpnhonoloa o io n0

l o o a r o d

o f6 S o l o n 7

in b h S0

St a t0 w h o 

### i0 O V O diXI(

l T OO t, bJ O a W 9 l 

### uoh 

### other $0 be publ:ohed ia ouoh unaor 

### 00 ha mom0 noo(i llkoly 60 ettooPi $ho ornot. mm nyard ohall bo prld out of tha **Stoto** 

### TnuurT **to** 

### tho **pors6n the**  **beoomeo** l **ntitlod to**  i% u p o a l o u t u l o~t a or 

### tha a o r u a or m o iti mg tl m 

### foota wkioh oneidle ruoh porsoa te rroeire it.* 

### m ti . 8 b t b O UW Slt O

l BOl4 Ud

Witi co ii

### ur luS$orLtooli indioatm that thr ala y $8 tb only 0x1:whioh ham kw 

### illed **di.aH that**  **(rho** 

### l

rmot **of PI4Nop**  may uo&Smaoo, they do aolc ua@ h4w@RmdotburuttlP4ntaf4an


### rhwtbwr or net he udo **tha amOb**  **Qotr** 

### w thanto furniohedbin W wa other **peroou~**



### ATTO!U?EY

ORtlQ ’tAL

Ot TXA6
# C_2016185EN.01000102.xml

| 24.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7985 — Segro/PSPIB/Target Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 185/02)

On 17 May 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7985. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7985. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ANDRE SANTONIO HILL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 15

- 4176

[ March 9, 2016 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County ; James W. McCann

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 562003CF002458A

.
Andre Santonio Hill, Mayo, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez

- Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Appellant Andre Hill appeals the trial court’s order striking his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence. The court found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion due to appellant’s pending appeal from the d enial of a related claim in a rule 3.850 motion for post

- conviction relief. We affirm.

We also find that appellant’s claim is meritless. Robbery with a deadly weapon is a first degree felony punishable by life imprisonment. § 812.13(2)( a), Fla. Stat. (2003). The trial court was required to impose a life sentence under the prison releasee reoffender statute. See § 775.082(9)(a)3.a., Fla. Stat. (2003); McDonald v. State , 957 So. 2d 605, 612

- 13 (Fla. 2007).

Affirmed.

C IKLIN , C.J., D AMOORGIAN and L EVINE , JJ., concur.2 * * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
### -79.5 -79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 37.5 38.0 38.5 39.0 

## ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/09 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ●


## ★ ● ● ● ●
Sea Ranch homes west of CA51 showing typical placement among trees
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex parte Kelcey Kent Reece, * From the County Court at Law No. 2

of Midland County,

 Trial Court No. CR 151,104.

No. 11-16-00196-CR * November 30, 2016

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the 

order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit 10.37
​

​
	​


	​



	​
	Dear

	​
	ENERGY VAULT SA

	​
	Via Pessina 13

	​
	6900 Lugano

	​
	​

	​
	​

	​
	Bioggio, 1 giugno 2021 RQ/tc



​
LEASE EXTENSION
Dear Sirs,
As discussed and agreed with Mr. Gionatan Cattaneo, we confirm our agreement for the extension of the partial lease of mappale 55 RFD Castione from 1 November 2021 to 30 October 2022 at the following conditions:
Space and buildings at your disposal as per the attached plan.
Rent of Chf./year 252'400.00 + VAT payable in quarterly instalments in advance.
All management expenses are at your charge.
All other clauses of the current lease agreement will remain valid.
Energy Vault SA will have to extend or issue a new guarantee expiring on 30 October 2022 as attached and to be delivered to Castim SA by 30 September 2021.
For the above, a copy of the liability insurance in respect of your activities on the subject land parcel is required.
This confirmation, signed by both parties, is valid as a binding document and as an extension of the lease agreement.
​
	   


	​


	​



	FOR APPROVAL
	   
	​

	​
	​
	​

	ENERGY VAULT SA
	​
	CASTIM SA

	​
	​
	Riccardo Quadroni

	​
	​
	​

	/s/ Robert Piconi
	​
	/s/ Riccardo Quadroni



​
Annexes: cited
CASTIM SA
Via Industria 31 - 6934 Bioggio (CH)
Tel++41 91 604 64 10
Fax++41 91 604 64 15 E-mail tigestim@tigestim.com
Exhibit 21.1



Subsidiaries of Oplink Communications, Inc.



|Subsidiaries of Registrant                       |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation |  | Subsidiarys Business Name                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Shanghai Oplink Communications, Inc.             |  | Shanghai, China               |  | Shanghai Oplink Communications, Inc.                                                                                  
|                                                 |  |                              
|Zhuhai FTZ Oplink Communications, Inc.           |  | Zhuhai, China                 |  | Zhuhai FTZ Oplink Communications, Inc.                                                                                
|                                                 |  |                              
|Zhuhai FTZ Oplink Optical Communications, Inc.   |  | Zhuhai, China                 |  | Zhuhai FTZ Oplink Optical Communications, Inc. (formerly Zhuhai Oplink Communications, Inc., located in Zhuhai, China)
|                                                 |  |                              
|Zhuhai FTZ Telelight Communication, Inc.         |  | Zhuhai, China                 |  | Zhuhai FTZ Telelight Communication, Inc. (formerly Fuzhou Telelight Communication, Inc., located in Fuzhou, China)    
|                                                 |  |                              
|Oplink Macau Commercial Services Company Limited |  | Macau, China                  |  | Oplink Macau Commercial Services Company Limited
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2717 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2717

    To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that revenues 
 collected from passengers as aviation security fees are used to help 
    finance the costs of aviation security screening by repealing a 
   requirement that a portion of such fees be credited as offsetting 
      receipts and deposited in the general fund of the Treasury.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2021

 Mr. Markey (for himself and Mr. Blumenthal) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 49, United States Code, to ensure that revenues 
 collected from passengers as aviation security fees are used to help 
    finance the costs of aviation security screening by repealing a 
   requirement that a portion of such fees be credited as offsetting 
      receipts and deposited in the general fund of the Treasury.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Funding for Aviation Screeners and 
Threat Elimination Restoration Act'' or the ``FASTER Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT REGARDING CREDITING AND DEPOSIT OF A 
              PORTION OF AVIATION SECURITY FEES.

    (a) Repeal.--Section 44940 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking paragraph (3);
            (2) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking the heading and inserting ``Deposit 
                and Availability of Fee.--'';
                    (B) by striking paragraph (1);
                    (C) by redesignating paragraphs (2) and (3) as 
                paragraphs (1) and (2), respectively; and
                    (D) by amending paragraph (1), as so redesignated, 
                to read as follows:
            ``(1) shall be deposited into a separate account in the 
        Treasury, which shall be available to the Administrator for 
        expenditure only to pay the costs of activities and services 
        for which the fee is imposed; and''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (i).
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (d)(4) of such section is 
amended by striking ``, other than subsection (i),''.
                                 <all>
```
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Alpha Marine Services, LLC ) ASBCA No. 63181

)

Under Contract No. N62387

- 15

- C

- 2100 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Daniel R. Weckstein, Esq.

Anthony J. Mazzeo, Esq.

Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black PLC

Norfolk, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Craig D. Jensen, Esq.

Navy Chief Trial Attorney

Christine E.G. McMurdo, Esq.

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 21, 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63181

, Appeal of Alpha Marine

Services, LLC , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 24, 2023 RICHARD SHACKLEFORD

Administrative Judge

Acting Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services2 Board of Contract Appeals
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MARK KEVIN ANDREWS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 127 and 128 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED. 

Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2681 

To require the level of telework of employees of agencies to return to the 

level of telework of those employees on February 14, 2020, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 9, 2021 

Mr. MARSHALL (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the level of telework of employees of agencies 

to return to the level of telework of those employees 

on February 14, 2020, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Return Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

6 In this Act: 

7 (1) AGENCY.—The term ‘‘agency’’ has the 

8 meaning given the term in section 101 of title 31, 

9 United States Code. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2681 IS

1 (2) COVERED PERIOD.—The term ‘‘covered pe2 riod’’ means the period beginning on February 14, 

3 2020, and ending on the date of enactment of this 

4 Act. 

5 (3) TELEWORK.—The term ‘‘telework’’ has the 

6 meaning given the term in section 6501 of title 5, 

7 United States Code. 

8 SEC. 3. REQUIREMENT TO RETURN. 

9 Not later than September 30, 2021, the head of each 

10 agency shall require the level of telework of employees of 

11 the agency to return to the level of telework of those em12 ployees on February 14, 2020. 

13 SEC. 4. REPORT. 

14 Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment 

15 of this Act, the Administrator of General Services, in co16 ordination with the Director of the Office of Personnel 

17 Management and the Director of the Office of Manage18 ment and Budget, shall submit to Congress a report that 

19 includes a description of how, during the covered period, 

20 agency services and response times for individuals in the 

21 United States who benefit from services of agencies were 

22 affected by— 

23 (1) the increased level of telework of employees 

24 of agencies; and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2681 IS

1 (2) the limited access to physical mail, data 

2 servers, and voice mail at agencies. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 21



Deltic Timber Corporation

Subsidiaries of the
Registrant

As of December 31, 2003





|                                      |  |                       
|------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|Subsidiaries                          |  | State of Incorporation
|Deltic Timber Purchasers, Inc.        |  | Arkansas              
|                                      | 
|Deltic Southwest Timber Company       |  | Arkansas              
|                                      | 
|Deltic Real Estate Investment Company |  | Delaware              
|                                      | 
|Chenal Properties, Inc.               |  | Arkansas              
|                                      | 
|Chenal Country Club, Inc.             |  | Arkansas