alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015364EN.01000201.xml

| 4.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 November 2015

(2015/C 364/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1032 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4585 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71320 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3843 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0885 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3370 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,097 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,19 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2532 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4383 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0950 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5457 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4450 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5500 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6356 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5466 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 254,62 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1851 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9914 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5855 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 062,24 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7441 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,713 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,7262 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,276 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2724 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2111 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,3534 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1032

JPY

Japanese yen

133,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4585

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71320

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3843

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0885

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3370

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,097

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,19

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2532

RON

Romanian leu

4,4383

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0950

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5457

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4450

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5500

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6356

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5466

KRW

South Korean won

1 254,62

ZAR

South African rand

15,1851

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9914

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5855

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 062,24

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7441

PHP

Philippine peso

51,713

RUB

Russian rouble

70,7262

THB

Thai baht

39,276

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2724

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2111

INR

Indian rupee

72,3534

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2810 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure the solvency of 

the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund by extending the excise tax on coal. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Mr. BROWN, Mr. KAINE, Mr. CASEY, and Mr. 

WARNER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure 

the solvency of the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund 

by extending the excise tax on coal. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Black Lung Benefits 

5 Disability Trust Fund Solvency Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2810 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF BLACK LUNG DISABILITY TRUST 

2 FUND EXCISE TAX. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4121(e)(2)(A) of the In4 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘De5 cember 31, 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2031’’. 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 this section shall apply on and after the first day of the 

8 first calendar month beginning after the date of the enact9 ment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2016271EN.01000101.xml

| 26.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8113 — Thoma Bravo/Qlik Technologies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 271/01)

On 18 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8113. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8113. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I-many, Inc. (the Company) for the three-month period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, A. Leigh Powell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin F. Collins, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    
|--------------------
|Dated:  May 13, 2003
|                    
|                    
|Dated:  May 13, 2003
|                    



A signed original of
this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2591 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2591

  To establish the National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2021

  Mr. Ossoff introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To establish the National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Equal Pay for Equal Work Enforcement 
Act''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL EQUAL PAY ENFORCEMENT TASK FORCE.

    (a) In General.--There is established the National Equal Pay 
Enforcement Task Force, consisting of representatives from the Equal 
Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Justice, the 
Department of Labor, and the Office of Personnel Management.
    (b) Mission.--In order to improve compliance, public education, and 
enforcement of equal pay laws, the National Equal Pay Enforcement Task 
Force will ensure that the agencies in subsection (a) are coordinating 
efforts and limiting potential gaps in enforcement.
    (c) Duties.--The National Equal Pay Enforcement Task Force shall 
investigate challenges related to pay inequity pursuant to its mission 
in subsection (b), advance recommendations to address those challenges, 
and create action plans to implement the recommendations.
                                 <all>
```
Last updated on Tuesday, February 15, 2011. 

## National Estuaries Program http://w ater.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/index.cfm

National Estuary Program Booklet (PDF) (11

pp, 2.8MB, About PDF) Cover Photo Credit: Mark Lagrange Features The National Estuary Program in Action State of Our NEP Estuaries National Estuary Program Evaluation Guidance - Final (PDF) (32 pp, 886K, About

PDF)

Smart Grow th: Estuary Protection and

Improvement

Climate Ready Estuaries

National Estuary Program Multimedia

Announcing the availability of EPA’s 2008 National Coastal Condition Report

III

Announcing the availability of EPA's 2004- 2006 National Estuary Program (NEP) Implementation Report (PDF) (14 pp, 1MB, About PDF ) Previous Features You are here: Water Our Waters Oceans, Coasts, Estuaries & Beaches National Estuary Program 

# National Estuary Program

Estuaries are places where rivers meet the sea. Estuaries are critical to the health of coastal environments and to our enjoyment of them. EPA's National Estuary Program was established by Congress in 1987 to improve the quality of estuaries of national importance. The Clean Water Act Section 320 directs EPA to develop plans for attaining or maintaining water quality in an estuary. This includes protection of public water supplies and the protection and propagation of a balanced, indigenous population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife, and allows recreational activities, in and on water, requires that control of point and nonpoint sources of pollution to supplement existing controls of pollution. In several cases, more than one State is participating in a National Estuary Program. Each program establishes a Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan to meet the goals of Section 320. In addition to water quality improvements, habitat restoration and protection is one of the major focuses of the National Estuary Program. View NEP goals and plans, as well as learn about habitat loss and degradation, and its contributing factors. Local NEP Project information is available including maps, project descriptions, and photos. NEPs are effective, efficient, collaborative, and adaptive community-based programs. To find out more, see the vibrant NEP booklet below. To order free copies of this publication, simply call 800-490-9198 and request the EPA document number provided. EPA's National Estuary Program is proud of its progress and has had many successes . The NEPs have succeeded because: they focus on the watershed, use science to inform decision-making, emphasize collaborative problem solving, and involve the public. The successes of the National Estuary Program are largely a result of the programs' ability to develop long term, sustainable finance strategies
. Share 

## 3/15/2011 National Estuary Program | National E...

water.epa.gov/type/oceb/.../index.cfm 1/1
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10774 Conference Calendar

PATRICK EUGENE SANDERS, also known as Patrick Evene Sanders, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus OFFICER MYERS, Fort Worth Police Department, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:01-CV-325-A

-------------------- October 26, 2001 Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Patrick Eugene Sanders, Texas state prisoner # 204595, appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel. A trial court is not required to appoint counsel for an indigent plaintiff asserting a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 unless there are exceptional circumstances. Ulmer v. Chancellor , 691 F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). Because Sanders’ case is not particularly complex and because he has demonstrated his abilityNo. 01-10774 -2- to present his claims, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to appoint counsel. See id. at 213.
AFFIRMED.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on Briefs July 28, 2009

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RANDY JOE MCNEW

 Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sullivan County

No. S51,902 R. Jerry Beck, Judge

No. E2008-02189-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 13, 2009

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, P.J., concurring.

I concur with the majority opinion. I believe, though, that the statement that the weight

assigned to advisory enhancement and mitigating factors no longer has an appellate review provision

should not preclude such an assessment relative to whether the sentence meets the principles and

purposes of the Sentencing Act. That is, for example, using a five-year old conviction for speeding

to enhance an aggravated burglary conviction to a maximum sentence may not meet the principles

and purposes of the Sentencing Act because of inordinate weight given to the speeding conviction.

____________________________________

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, PRESIDING JUDGE
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CalifAcquisitions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Anthony N.DeMint                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief AccountingOfficer

 

May 20, 2005
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. FRANK J. BROWN, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 64 EAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 15th day of July, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

__________ No. 09

- 1057

__________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. KORY BARHAM , a/k/a Cutty Blue , a/k/a Cuttlas Y. Blue Kory Barham , Appellant

__________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C . Criminal No. 1

- 05

- cr
- 00443

- 010 ) District Judge: The Honorable Yvette Kane

__________ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) April 25, 2011
BEFORE: BARRY, HARDIMAN, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges

. (Filed : June 29, 2011 )

__________ OPINION OF THE COURT

__________ NYGAARD, Circuit Judge

. Kory Barham pleaded guilty to conspiracy to transport individuals for purposes of prostitution, coerc ing and entic ing th e m to travel to engage in prostitution , and interstate2 travel with intent to distr ibute proceeds of prostitution, in violation of 18 U .S.C. § § 371, 2421, 2422 (a) , and 1952 (a) . He also pleaded guilty to a specific count of interstate t ravel for purposes of prostitution in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952 (a)(3) and (2)

. Quoting his brief, Barham raises the following questions on appeal: 1. Was appellant’s guideline range mistakenly calculated because it w as based on the treatment of victims as minors?
2. Is remand within the Court’s discretion because the sentence was excessive? Appellant’s Brief, p. 4. We will affirm

. Barham asserts that the District Court mistakenly applied U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual § 2G1.3 (2007 ) because he did not persona lly victimize any minors.
Barha m failed to preserve this issue and we review it for plain error. United States v. Johnson, 302 F.3d 139, 153 (3d Cir. 2002). 1

1 Barham moved for permission not to attend a presentence evidentiary hearing, plainly stating in the motion that he was withdrawing his objections to the Report. Evidence before the District Court contradicts Barham’s argument, showing that he prostituted a seventeen year
- old girl. He
also ignores the relevance of conduct of his co

- conspirators who prostituted over forty
minors

. Given Barham’s admitted interaction with his co

- conspirators, and the routine
recruitment of minors that was pervasive in the co nspiracy, there is no question that this
conduct is attributable to him. Moreover, Barham’s sentence of 108 months was calculated from the statutory maximums that resulted from his plea agreement. We
conclude from all of this that t he District Court did not err.3 Barham also appeals the substantive reasonableness of his sentence. Yet, in its consideration of Barham’s sentence, t he District Cou rt took into account the facto rs enumerated under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) and assessed the reasonablene ss of the pl ea bargain sentence , weighing his role in the conspiracy with the gravity of the offense. W e conclude that his sentence of 108 months is eminently reasonable and will affirm the judgment of sentence of the District Court.
#### Sam Kalner, Doing Business under the Trade Name and Style of Well Made Doll Co., Plaintiff, *v.*Charles Samet and Others, Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Samet’s Novelty Co., Defendants.*

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 26, 1937.

*789
      *Morris Kirschstein,*for the plaintiff. ■.

*Benjamin Koenig,*for the defendant Charles Samet.

Affd., 253 App. Div. 79¿.

Lauer, J.

The plaintiff, conducting the business of a manufacturer of dolls under the name of the Well Made Doll Co., seeks an injunction from the defendants who are likewise manufacturers of dolls, doing business under the name of Samet’s Novelty Co. From the papers it appears that the plaintiff put on the market a so-called *“*Drinking-Wetting Doll ” under the designation of “ Q-T Baby Doll,” and packed this doll in a carton which had printed in blue color on all sides and on the top of the carton the figure of a doll in a seated position with the legend on the sides: “ Drinks its Bottle Wets its Diaper.” There was also in blue color a two-page leaflet attached to plaintiff’s doll with certain descriptive printed matter appearing thereon.

The defendants have put out a doll of a somewhat larger size, clothed in precisely similar manner as the plaintiff’s doll, and packed in a carton with the identical figure of the doll which is contained on the plaintiff’s carton under the name of “ Beauty Bottle Baby.” The carton contains the same legend, “ Drinks its Bottle Wets its Diaper ” as is contained on the carton of, the plaintiff. The style of the carton is similar to that of the plaintiff’s except that the color scheme of the defendants’ carton is red, whereas the color scheme of the plaintiff’s carton is blue. The defendants’ doll has attached to it a leaflet, blue in color, almost identical in wording and style to that of the leaflet that is attached to the plaintiff’s doll.

The idea of the so-called *“*Drinking-Wetting ” doll appears not to be a new one, such a doll having been on the market for several years, according to the papers submitted on this application. However, it appears that the defendants, in simulating the name of the doll (there being a similarity in sound between Q-T and Beauty), coupled with the very apparent imitation of the clothing of the doll and of the style of packing and the appearance of the carton and the tag or leaflet attached to the doll, are guilty of unfair business competition. *(Nu Enamel Corp.*v. *Nate Enamel Co., Inc.,*243 App. Div. 292; affd., 268 N. Y. 574.)

The injunction prayed for should be granted, Settle order.
# C_2016194EN.01000201.xml

| 1.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 194/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 194/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 May 2016

(2016/C 194/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1154 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,83 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4376 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,76185 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2910 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1044 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3200 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,022 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,11 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3865 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5108 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2927 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5366 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4530 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6640 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6516 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5367 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 326,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5863 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3363 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4895 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 180,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5940 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,149 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,5300 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,775 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9850 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5185 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,9510 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1154

JPY

Japanese yen

123,83

DKK

Danish krone

7,4376

GBP

Pound sterling

0,76185

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2910

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1044

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3200

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,022

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,11

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3865

RON

Romanian leu

4,5108

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2927

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5366

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4530

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6640

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6516

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5367

KRW

South Korean won

1 326,11

ZAR

South African rand

17,5863

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3363

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4895

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 180,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5940

PHP

Philippine peso

52,149

RUB

Russian rouble

73,5300

THB

Thai baht

39,775

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9850

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5185

INR

Indian rupee

74,9510

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---