alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1966]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones;                

*Whereas,*                     the City of Waterville, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 186, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-65-2014, docketed 09-11-2014) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a service area of the Counties of Lincoln, Cumberland, Sagadahoc, Androscoggin, Kennebec, Waldo, Knox and Somerset (partial), Maine, within and adjacent to the Belfast Customs and Border Protection port of entry, and FTZ 186's existing Site 1 would be categorized as a magnet site;                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (79 FR 56057, 09-18-2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to reorganize FTZ 186 under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone.

Signed at Washington, DC, this March 12, 2015.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board. 

Andrew McGilvray,

 Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-06462 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF JUMBOSPORTS INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED JANUARY 29,
1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              Year
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-29-1999
<CASH>                                          23,809
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                       428
<INVENTORY>                                    121,586
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               164,583
<PP&E>                                         158,853
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,040
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 307,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,503
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           204
<OTHER-SE>                                     (45,269)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   307,967
<SALES>                                        362,395
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               362,395
<CGS>                                          256,748
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  282,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                93,111
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                58,344
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,366
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (93,677)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (163)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (93,514)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (93,514)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (4.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (4.58)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER OF TRAMMELL CROW COMPANYPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350**

In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2004 and filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derek R. McClain,Chief Financial Officer of Trammell Crow Company (the “Company”), herebycertify that:

1.                The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.                Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|                      | /s/ DEREK R. MCCLAIN    |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|                      | Name: Derek R.  McClain |
| Date: March 16, 2005 |                    |

 

----
# C_2016219EN.01000102.xml

| 17.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8047 — Inter IKEA Holding/Parts of INGKA Holding)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 219/02)

On 13 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8047. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8047. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEWIS HAGGARD,

 Petitioner - Appellee,

 v.

BEN CURRY, Warden,

 Respondent - Appellant.

No. 10-16819

D.C. No. 3:06-cv-07658-SI

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Susan Illston, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 19, 2011** 

Before: GOODWIN, WALLACE, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges. 

Ben Curry appeals from the district court’s judgment granting California

state prisoner Lewis Haggard’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we vacate and remand.

FILED

DEC 23 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-16819

The district court granted relief in connection with the Board of Prison

Terms’ 2004 decision to deny Haggard parole. Intervening Supreme Court

authority explains that the only federal right at issue in the parole context is

procedural, and the only proper inquiry is what process the inmate received, not

whether the state court decided the case correctly. See Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S.

Ct. 859, 862-63 (2011) (per curiam). Because Haggard raised no procedural

challenges, we reverse the district court’s judgment. 

We express no opinion on the merits of Haggard’s claims concerning his

plea agreement. We leave to the district court resolution of those claims on

remand.

VACATED and REMANDED.
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rajesh Raniga, Chief Financial Officer of EYI Industries, Inc. (the
"Registrant"), certify that;

(1)   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of EYI Industries,
      Inc.;

(2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;

(3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4)   The Registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
      and have:

      a)    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
            disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
            supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
            Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
            to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      b)    Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls
            and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of
            the end of the period covered by this report based on such
            evaluation; and

      c)    Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
            control over financial reporting that occurred during the
            Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
            affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
            Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

(5)   The Registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
      on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial
      reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):

      a)    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
            reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b)    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
            other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:      August 19,  2005


         /s/ Rajesh Raniga
By:      Rajesh Raniga
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 10.34 (b)
                         Exhibit B
                             
                 Indemnification Agreement


QUANTUM CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, with its
primary business location at 500 McCarthy Boulevard,
Milpitas, California  95035 and Quantum Storage Malaysia
("QSM") (M) Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia (collectively "Quantum") and
IOMEGA CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation with its primary
business location at 1821 West Iomega Way, Roy, UT  84067
and any future Malaysian subsidiary (collectively "Iomega")
execute the following indemnification agreement
("Agreement").


                         Agreement

Whereas, Quantum has agreed to cause its wholly owned
subsidiary, QSM to sell its facility located at Plot 44,
Phase IV, Bayan Free Trade Zone, Penang, Malaysia ("the
Facility") and Iomgea has agreed to purchase the Facility,
and

Whereas, Iomega intends to operate the Facility but has not
received the necessary business permits ("Permits") from the
Malaysian government to do so, 
and

Whereas, Quantum is in the process of shutting down the
Facility, and had scheduled the termination of the
employment of the majority of its employees,
and

Whereas, Iomega has issued offers of employment to
approximately 350 of Quantum's employees who were originally
scheduled for termination effective July 15, 1996 ("the
Iomega Employees"), and

Whereas, Iomega has requested Quantum to continue employment
of the Iomega employees until such time as Iomega has
received the Permits to allow it to employ the Iomega
Employees.

Whereas, Quantum has agreed to so act, provided that Iomega
indemnifies Quantum for any adverse consequence it might
suffer as a result of so acting.

Now therefore,

The parties hereby agree that Iomega will release, indemnify
and hold harmless Quantum, and all of its officers,
directors, employees, agents or successors in interests from
any and all expenses and/or costs, including but not limited
to, any legal expenses, claims, proceedings, and/or other
adverse monetary consequences associated with, or arising
out of, Quantum's continued employment of the Iomega
employees and/or the enforcement of this Agreement.


Quantum Corporation                     Iomega Corporation

By:    /s/ Andy Kryder                  By:  /s/ Donald R. Sterling
       Andy Kryder                           Donald R. Sterling

Title: V.P., General Counsel            Title:

Date:     7/12/96                       Date:     7/15/96
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2830 

Making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2022, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 23, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. HAGERTY, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

Making supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2022, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 That the following sums are appropriated, out of any 

4 money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, for the 

5 fiscal year ending September 30, 2022, and for other pur6 poses, namely: 

7 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PROCUREMENT 

8 PROCUREMENT, DEFENSE-WIDE

9 For an additional amount for ‘‘Procurement, De10 fense-Wide’’, $1,000,000,000, to remain available until 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2830 IS

1 September 30, 2024, for the Secretary of Defense to pro2 vide to the Government of Israel for the procurement of 

3 the Iron Dome defense system to counter short-range 

4 rocket threats: Provided, That such funds shall be pro5 vided to address emergent requirements in support of Op6 eration Guardian of Walls: Provided further, That such 

7 funds shall be transferred pursuant to an exchange of let8 ters and are in addition to funds provided pursuant to the 

9 U.S.-Israel Iron Dome Procurement Agreement, as 

10 amended: Provided further, That nothing in the preceding 

11 provisos shall be construed to apply to amounts made 

12 available in prior appropriations Acts for the procurement 

13 of the Iron Dome defense system: Provided further, That 

14 such amount is designated by the Congress as being for 

15 an emergency requirement pursuant to section 4001(a)(1) 

16 and section 4001(b) of S. Con. Res. 14 (117th Congress), 

17 the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 

18 2022. 

19 GENERAL PROVISIONS—THIS ACT 

20 SEC. 101. Each amount appropriated or made avail21 able by this Act is in addition to amounts otherwise appro22 priated for the fiscal year involved. 

23 SEC. 102. Unless otherwise provided for by this Act, 

24 the additional amounts appropriated by this Act to appro25 priations accounts shall be available under the authorities 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2830 IS

1 and conditions applicable to such appropriations accounts 

2 for fiscal year 2022. 

3 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Iron Dome Supple4 mental Appropriations Act, 2022’’. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9069]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Yoko Ono: One Woman Show 1960-1971''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Yoko Ono: One Woman Show 1960-1971'', 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about May 17, 2015, until on 
or about September 7, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact the Office of the Legal Adviser, 
U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), 
Washington, DC 20522-0505, telephone (202-632-6471), or email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e093858394898f8ed2d4d5d9a09394819485ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c5f494f584543421e1819156c5f584d5849024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 18, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-07077 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
|   | (1) | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                              |   |                                                |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 11, 2011   | By:    | /s/ Conghui Ding                                    |   |
|                              |   | Conghui Ding                                        |   |
|                              |   | Principal Executive OfficerLansdowne Security, Inc. |   |
|                              |   |                                                |   |

----
J-S78004-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

DARNELL KIRK RUTHERFORD, JR.,

Appellant No. 931 WDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence Entered January 21, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County

Criminal Division at No(s): CP-02-CR-0008728-2013

BEFORE: BENDER, P.J.E., OTT, J., and FITZGERALD, J.*

MEMORANDUM BY BENDER, P.J.E.: FILED NOVEMBER 30, 2016

Appellant, Darnell Kirk Rutherford, Jr., appeals from the judgment of 

sentence of an aggregate term of 31⁄2 to 7 years’ incarceration, imposed 

after he was convicted of various offenses, including robbery of a motor 

vehicle. Appellant challenges the sufficiency and weight of the evidence to 

sustain his convictions. After careful review, we affirm.

We have examined the briefs of the parties, the certified record, and 

the applicable law. We have also reviewed the thorough opinion of the 

Honorable Edward J. Borkowski filed on March 14, 2016. In that decision, 

Judge Borkowski summarizes the pertinent facts and procedural history of 

Appellant’s case, and then succinctly evaluates each of the issues (and 

____________________________________________

*

Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.
J-S78004-16

- 2 -

various sub-claims) that Appellant raises on appeal. See Trial Court Opinion 

(TCO), 3/14/16, at 2-20.1 We conclude that Judge Borkowsi’s well-reasoned 

opinion accurately disposes of the issues presented by Appellant; thus, we 

adopt his rationale as our own and affirm Appellant’s judgment of sentence 

on that basis.

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 11/30/2016

____________________________________________

1 We note that Judge Borkowski also addresses several sentencing claims 

that Appellant has abandoned on appeal. See TCO at 20-26. We express 

no opinion on the propriety of Judge Borkowski’s decision on those issues, as 

they are not before us.
Circulated 11/07/2016 02:45 PM












Circulated 11/07/2016 02:45 PM