alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016257EN.01000101.xml

| 15.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8085 — AEA/Scan Global Logistics)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 257/01)

On 8 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8085. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8085. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016263EN.01000101.xml

| 20.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8080 — Maxburg II/VREP/Norafin)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 263/01)

On 11 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8080. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8080. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofCalif Acquisitions, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| /s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

November 6, 2006
In The Matter Of: 

MIAMI TECH 

SERVED: OCTOBER 14, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0682 

AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2010S0190295 

Respondent 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On January 15, 2015, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed. Among 

other things, this Order set a telephone motion conference for November 4, 2015, and the 

Hearing for February 23-26, 2016, in the Fort Lauderdale, Florida area. 

On October 5, 2015, the Respondent filed a Notice of Settlement stating that the "parties 

have reached a negotiated resolution of [FAA's] claims against Respondent in the above 

referenced matter." 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The telephone motion conference set for November 4, 2015, is cancelled. 

2. The Hearing set for February 23-26, 2016, is cancelled. 

3. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Respondent has withdrawn its Request for Hearing, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. William Vines 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

1701 Columbia Avenue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FPC{: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Juan R. Serrano 

Respondent's Counsel 

Griffin & Serrano, P.A. 

Blackstone Building, Sixth Floor 

707 Southeast 3rd Avenue 

Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316 

TEL: 954-462-4002 

FAX: 954-462-4009 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FPC{: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0682 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: ;,: LvvTtf [ \nvt?^ k y (JLt ^ ^r^ -AK^C'CJ L^^C'U/a j 

With respect to the attached rulemaking ciocuinent(s): 

1. E.0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

/ 

^ ^ The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OBRA. 

The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

/ This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

'is.\H</ 

Name 

Title/Office , 

Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# TIME AND DATE:

March 11, 2015, at 4:30 p.m.

# PLACE:

Washington, DC, via Teleconference.

# STATUS:

*Committee Votes to Close March 11, 2015, Meeting:*                         By telephone vote on March 11, 2015, members of the Temporary Emergency Committee of the Board of Governors of the United States Postal Service met and voted unanimously to close to public observation its meeting held in Washington, DC, via teleconference. The Committee determined that no earlier public notice was possible.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

*Wednesday, March 11, 2015, at 4:30 p.m.*

1. Pricing.

General Counsel Certification: The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting was properly closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Julie S. Moore, Secretary of the Board, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW., Washington, DC, 20260-1000, telephone (202) 268-4800.

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary, Board of Governors.

[FR Doc. 2015-06372 Filed 3-17-15; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2015287EN.01000201.xml

| 1.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 August 2015

(2015/C 287/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1215 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4629 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72753 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5032 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0825 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3585 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,70 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2289 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4307 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2731 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5753 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4863 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6920 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7536 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5842 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 326,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9546 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1579 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5530 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 769,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6998 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,487 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,8581 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,200 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0671 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,9130 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,4698 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1215

JPY

Japanese yen

136,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4629

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72753

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5032

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0825

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3585

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,70

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2289

RON

Romanian leu

4,4307

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2731

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5753

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4863

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6920

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7536

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5842

KRW

South Korean won

1 326,96

ZAR

South African rand

14,9546

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1579

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5530

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 769,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6998

PHP

Philippine peso

52,487

RUB

Russian rouble

74,8581

THB

Thai baht

40,200

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0671

MXN

Mexican peso

18,9130

INR

Indian rupee

74,4698

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
District of Columbia

Court of Appeals

No. 14-BG-1166

IN RE JOHN M. GREEN

 2011 BDN 87

A Suspended Member of the Bar of the 

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg. No. 476592

BEFORE: McLeese, Associate Judge, and Belson and Nebeker, Senior Judges.

ORDER

On further consideration of the Board on Professional Responsibility’s 

Report and Recommendation wherein it recommended that respondent be 

suspended for ninety days, with thirty days stayed in lieu of a one-year period of 

probation with conditions, the exceptions filed by Disciplinary Counsel, this 

court’s February 23, 2016, order staying this matter pending resolution of 

respondent’s reciprocal bar matter arising out of discipline imposed by the state of 

Maryland, and it appearing that respondent has been indefinitely suspended in this 

jurisdiction as reciprocal discipline with reinstatement contingent on a showing of 

fitness, see In re Green, 114 A.3d 660 (D.C. 2015), Disciplinary Counsel’s letter 

withdrawing its exceptions in this matter, this court’s May 25, 2016, order lifting 

the stay, this court’s July 29, 2016, order remanding the record to the Board of 

Professional Responsibility for its recommendation on whether discipline imposed 

in this case should run consecutively or concurrently to that imposed in the 

reciprocal case, and the Report and Recommendation of the Board on Professional 

Responsibility wherein it recommends that the discipline in this case run 

concurrently with that imposed in In re Green, 114 A.3d 660 (D.C. 2015), and it 

further appearing that respondent has yet to file his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g)

affidavit, it is

12/1/16
ORDERED that John M. Green is hereby suspended from the practice of law 

in the District of Columbia for a period of ninety days, the last thirty days stayed in 

favor of a one-year period of probation with conditions. This sanction shall run 

concurrently with the indefinite suspension with a fitness requirement imposed in 

In re Green, 114 A.3d 660 (D.C. 2015). It is 

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement in either the 

original or reciprocal disciplinary matters, respondent’s period of suspension will 

not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully complies with the 

requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 (g). 

PER CURIAM
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 24-9


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain and J.
Christopher Kirk and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact,
with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name,
place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or officer, or both, as
the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the
"Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2000, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others,
full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or
substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.


                                        /s/ William P. Leiser
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        William P. Leiser
# C_2014188EN.01001301.xml

| 20.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 188/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 188/13

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 June 2014

(2014/C 188/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3620 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,82 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4564 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79985 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0885 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2170 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3140 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,435 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,31 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1326 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3940 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9025 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4478 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4749 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5566 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5622 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7003 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 387,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5054 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4881 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5755 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 254,03 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3813 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,588 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,6940 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,330 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0426 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6774 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,7677 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3620

JPY

Japanese yen

138,82

DKK

Danish krone

7,4564

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79985

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0885

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2170

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3140

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,435

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,31

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1326

RON

Romanian leu

4,3940

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9025

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4478

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4749

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5566

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5622

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7003

KRW

South Korean won

1 387,13

ZAR

South African rand

14,5054

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4881

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5755

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 254,03

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3813

PHP

Philippine peso

59,588

RUB

Russian rouble

46,6940

THB

Thai baht

44,330

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0426

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6774

INR

Indian rupee

81,7677

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Wyoming Sulfate Contribution to Gates of the Mountains Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total GAMO1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 23 WY 0.0114261 4.35E-05 0.0006435 0.0006826 0.0015217 0.0143174 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Sulfate at Gates of the Mountains = 0.01 divided by 0.7, or 1% Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total GAMO1 2002 plan02c36k PS4 22 WY 0.0027773 3.18E-05 0.0001591 5.00E-05 0.0006273 0.0036455 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Sulfate at Gat es of the Mountains = 0.004 divided by 0.5, or < 1%
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 14, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 14, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16A1599. JOY LAKE, LLC et al. v. PNC BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certification of CEO/Treasurer

In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Southeastern Banking Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Cornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO
of the Company, and Alyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods
presented.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CORNELIUS P. HOLLAND, IIICornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO/s/ ALYSON G. BEASLEYAlyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer


Date: November 16, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6807

LARRY JAMES TYLER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CAPTAIN COE; WAYNE BYRD; DIANN WILKS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Beaufort. Mary G. Lewis, District Judge. 

(9:16-cv-00122-MGL)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry James Tyler, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry James Tyler appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. The district 

court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended 

that Tyler’s action be dismissed because he failed to comply 

with the court’s February 24, 2016, order instructing him that 

he had 21 days to fill out certain forms and provide information 

to the court needed to proceed with his action. The magistrate 

judge’s order advised Tyler that failure to file timely 

objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review 

of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas 

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Tyler has waived appellate review 

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. 

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We deny Tyler’s motion for appointment of counsel and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED