alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Derek R. McClain, certify that:

1.                 I have reviewedthis annual report on Form 10-K of Trammell Crow Company;

2.                 Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

3.                 Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

(b)         Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

(c)          Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.                 Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b)         Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
|                      | /s/  Derek R. McClain      |
|---------------------------|----------------------------|
|                      | Derek R. McClain           |
| Date: March 15, 2004 | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
# C_2016197EN.01000101.xml

| 3.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8021 — Bridgepoint / Summit Partners / Calypso Technology)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 197/01)

On 30 May 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8021. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8021. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
My name is Heather Langeland, and Ifully supportthe EPA's proposed standard. It should be implemented promptly and without changes that water it down in any way. Setting limits on the carbon pollution causing climate change will spur investment and innovation in clean energy technologies to modernize and clean up power plants. New clean energy technologies that produce less carbon pollution will create a newgeneration ofclean energyjobs. Since 1970, every dollar invested in compliance with Clean AirAct standards has yielded fourto eight dollars in economic benefits. Each time an extreme weather event hits acommunity around the country, the economic impact can be devastating. From 2011-2013 alone, damages from extremeweather events have exceeded $200 billion. While extreme weather events cost communities millions, inaction on climate change raises costs related to health care and hurts productivitythrough school and work days lost to hurricanes, blizzards, extreme heat and dirty air. The good news is that Americans are ready fortheir leaders and governmenttotake action. A February 2014 Sierra Club poll found that seven out often Americans favor setting limits on carbon pollution from power plants, and morethan half believe these safeguards already exist. The poll also found that 66 percent believe climate change is a serious problem and wantthe governmentto address it. Further, Americans are willing to puttheir money where their mouth is. A poll conducted by researchers from Harvard and Yale found thatthe average American is willing to pay $162 ayearfor cleaner energy. We have an obligation to our children and future generationsto address the primary cause ofclimate change: the unlimited dumping ofcarbon pollution into our air by power plants. The proposed carbon pollution standard will help protect us from the health risks and other impacts of climate change. Please adoptthe standard.

**~** 

### . I Thank you. \



### rec-~er 

## l_w,<f=LC.S1 

## C 

# F-1

**·-~** 

# \lth S"\

.

**~**

# J. 

# p, -tt.:.\)

**01~\\** 

# rA \':'S;).03 

# h-Lc..n'i<::..LG.'lc.\(f;:. \iGt\Y'Ic,, \. CC1ll
Exhibit 32.1





The following certifications are being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238 are being “furnished” to the SEC rather than “filed” either as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure statement, and are not to be incorporated by reference into
the Report or any other filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. The foregoing certifications shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of Section 18 or Sections 11 and 12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.





Certification of Chief Executive Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)             the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended May 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 18, 2009
/s/  Bruce J. WoodBruce J. Wood
President and Chief Executive Officer








Certification of Chief Financial Officer





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Schiff Nutrition International, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)             the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended May 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)             the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date: August 18, 2009
/s/  Joseph W. BatyJoseph W. Baty
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# C_2015350EN.01000301.xml

| 22.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 October 2015

(2015/C 350/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1354 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4596 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73490 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4219 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0864 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2625 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,079 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,25 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2757 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4315 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2989 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5707 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4764 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7995 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6869 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5815 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 292,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2444 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2088 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6165 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 610,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8669 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,730 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,3405 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,375 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4577 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,9044 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,9444 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1354

JPY

Japanese yen

136,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4596

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73490

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4219

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0864

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2625

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,079

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,25

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2757

RON

Romanian leu

4,4315

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2989

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5707

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4764

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7995

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6869

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5815

KRW

South Korean won

1 292,65

ZAR

South African rand

15,2444

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2088

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6165

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 610,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8669

PHP

Philippine peso

52,730

RUB

Russian rouble

71,3405

THB

Thai baht

40,375

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4577

MXN

Mexican peso

18,9044

INR

Indian rupee

73,9444

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 10.11

                       InteliData Technologies Corporation
                       Director Compensation Arrangements


     1.   Retainer
          a.   Each  non-employee  director  receives a $12,000 annual retainer,
               paid quarterly in arrears.

     2.   Meeting fees
          a.   Each non-employee director is paid $500 for each full Board
               meeting  he or  she  attends  in  person.
          b.   Each  non-employee  director is paid for  out-of-pocket  expenses
               related to attending Board meetings.

     3.   Stock options
          a.   Non-employee  directors  receive an annual grant of 6,000 options
               at each annual stockholders'  meeting. These options vest ratably
               over the succeeding twelve-month period.

     4.   Meeting expenses
          a.   InteliData  reimburses  directors for their expenses  incurred in
               attending Board of Directors meetings.
# CA2015330EN.01000101.xml

| 7.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 330/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 330/1

---

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION

(2015/C 330 A/01)

The publication in Official Journal of the European Union
   (1) of open competition EPSO/AD/321/15 — Administrators in the field of audit (AD 5/AD 7) is cancelled.

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

(1)  OJ C 316 A, 24.9.2015, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Rick G. Lester, certify that:     (1) I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Mariner Energy, Inc.;     (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;     (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     (4) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for the registrant and have:     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;     b. (Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 83-8238 and 34-47986);     c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and     d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and     (5) The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:March 30, 2006         /s/ Rick G. Lester         **Rick G. Lester**    **Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer**
**Exhibit 24.6**

** **

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E.Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher Kirk and eachof them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitutionand resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, and to sign anyor all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities andExchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of themwith or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each andevery act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about thepremises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do inperson, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-factor their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done byvirtue hereof.

 

 
|   | /s/ WILLIAM F. CONCANNON |   |
|--------|--------------------------|--------|
|   | William F. Concannon     |   |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2474 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2474

 To prohibit the use of funds made available under the American Rescue 
Plan Act of 2021 to purchase communications equipment or services that 
                     pose a national security risk.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2021

Mr. Cotton (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the use of funds made available under the American Rescue 
Plan Act of 2021 to purchase communications equipment or services that 
                     pose a national security risk.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Telecommunications Security 
Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO PURCHASE COMMUNICATIONS 
              EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES POSING NATIONAL SECURITY RISK.

    (a) In General.--The American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (Public Law 
117-2; 135 Stat. 4) is amended by adding at the end the following:

      ``TITLE XII--NATIONAL SECURITY RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF FUNDS

``SEC. 12001. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO PURCHASE COMMUNICATIONS 
              EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES POSING NATIONAL SECURITY RISK.

    ``None of the funds made available under this Act or an amendment 
made by this Act may be used to purchase any covered communications 
equipment or service, as defined in section 9 of the Secure and Trusted 
Communications Networks Act of 2019 (47 U.S.C. 1608).''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of contents in 
section 2 of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 is amended by adding 
at the end the following:

      ``TITLE XII--NATIONAL SECURITY RESTRICTIONS ON USE OF FUNDS

``Sec. 12001. Prohibition on use of funds to purchase communications 
                            equipment or services posing national 
                            security risk.''.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-21-00138-CV

IN RE Tara BOVE and Kevin Bove, Relators

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 28, 2021

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We 

may issue writs of mandamus when “agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.” 

TEX. GOV’T CODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record 

showing “the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists.” In re 

H.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P., 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). 

Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relators have 

not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motion for temporary relief. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-22591, styled In the Interest of A.L.F., a Child, pending in the 

225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding (denying the motion 

to strike) and the Honorable Rosie Alvarado (denying the motion to reconsider).
NO. 07-12-0349-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

AUGUST 7, 2012

______________________________

IN RE ELIGAH DARNELL, JR., RELATOR

_________________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

****By this original proceeding, Relator, Eligah Darnell, Jr., an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Potter County District Clerk, Caroline Woodburn, to file his civil complaint pursuant to chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.  For the reasons expressed herein, we deny Relator's request and dismiss his petition for writ of mandamus for want of jurisdiction.

This Court has the authority to issue writs of mandamus against a judge of a district or county court in our district and all writs necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.  Tex. Gov't Code Ann.  22.221(b) (West 2004).  In order for a district clerk to fall within our jurisdictional reach, it must be established that the issuance of the writ of mandamus is necessary to enforce our jurisdiction.  *In re Coronado*, 980 S.W.2d 691, 692-93 (Tex.App.San Antonio 1998, no pet.).  Relator has not demonstrated that the exercise of our mandamus authority against the Potter County District Clerk is appropriate to enforce our jurisdiction.  Consequently, we have no authority to issue a writ of mandamus against Caroline Woodburn.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Patrick A. Pirtle

      							       Justice

2