15822 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 25, 2015 / Notices 

20 TAA PETITIONS INSTITUTED BETWEEN 2/23/15 AND 3/6/15—Continued 

TA–W Subject firm 

(petitioners) Location Date of institution 

Date of 

petition 

85852 ...................................... Saint Gobain (State/One-Stop) .............................. Fort Smith, AR ............... 02/25/15 02/24/15 

85853 ...................................... Hewlett Packard Co. (State/One-Stop) .................. Palo Alto, CA ................. 02/25/15 02/24/15 

85854 ...................................... Magnetation (Company) ......................................... Grand Rapids, MN ......... 02/25/15 02/24/15 

85855 ...................................... Browns Plating Service, Inc. (Company) ............... Paducah, KY .................. 02/27/15 02/25/15 

85856 ...................................... Norwich Pharma—Alrogen Co. (State/One-Stop) Norwich, NY ................... 02/27/15 02/13/15 

85857 ...................................... Service Steel Inc. (State/One-Stop) ....................... Portland, OR .................. 02/27/15 02/25/15 

85858 ...................................... Nuance Communications, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ... Burlington, MA ............... 02/27/15 02/26/15 

85859 ...................................... Pfizer (State/One-Stop) .......................................... Rouses Point, NY .......... 03/02/15 02/27/15 

85860 ...................................... Coherent Inc. (Company) ....................................... Santa Clara, CA ............. 03/03/15 03/02/15 

85861 ...................................... Smead (State/One-Stop) ........................................ Cedar City, UT ............... 03/03/15 03/02/15 

85862 ...................................... Apex Tool Group (Company) ................................. Springdale, AR ............... 03/04/15 03/03/15 

85863 ...................................... Tejas Manufacturing Co. (Company) ..................... San Angelo, TX ............. 03/03/15 02/27/15 

85864 ...................................... Derwich Industries, Inc. (State/One-Stop) ............. Grayling, MI ................... 03/06/15 03/06/15 

85865 ...................................... Harland Clarke (State/One-Stop) ........................... San Antonio, TX ............ 03/06/15 03/04/15 

[FR Doc. 2015–06835 Filed 3–24–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–FN–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Wage and Hour Division 

Proposed Revision and Extension of 

the Approval of Information Collection 

Requirements 

AGENCY: Wage and Hour Division, 

Labor. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Labor 

(DOL), as part of its continuing effort to 

reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, conducts a preclearance 

consultation program to provide the 

general public and Federal agencies 

with an opportunity to comment on 

proposed and/or continuing collections 

of information in accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 44 

U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A). This program 

helps to ensure that requested data can 

be provided in the desired format, 

reporting burden (time and financial 

resources) is minimized, collection 

instruments are clearly understood, and 

the impact of collection requirements on 

respondents can be properly assessed. 

Currently, the Wage and Hour Division 

is soliciting comments concerning its 

proposal to extend Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

approval of the Information Collections: 

Application for a Farm Labor Contractor 

or Farm Labor Contractor Employee 

Certificate of Registration; Motor 

Vehicle Safety for Transportation of 

Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural 

Workers. Further, the Department is 

soliciting comments concerning its 

proposal to make revisions to the forms 

WH–514, WH–514a, WH–515, and WH– 

530. A copy of the proposed information 

collection request can be obtained by 

contacting the office listed below in the 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT

section of this Notice. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted to the office listed in the 

addresses section below on or before 

May 26, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, 

identified by Control Number 1235– 

0016, by either one of the following 

methods: 

Email: WHDPRAComments@dol.gov. 

Mail, Hand Delivery, Courier: 

Regulatory Analysis Branch, Wage and 

Hour Division, U.S. Department of 

Labor, Room S–3502, 200 Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. 

Instructions: Please submit one copy 

of your comments by only one method. 

All submissions received must include 

the agency name and Control Number 

identified above for this information 

collection. Because we continue to 

experience delays in receiving mail in 

the Washington, DC area, commenters 

are strongly encouraged to transmit their 

comments electronically via email or to 

submit them by mail early. Comments, 

including any personal information 

provided, become a matter of public 

record. They will also be summarized 

and/or included in the request for Office 

of Management and Budget approval of 

the information collection request. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mary Ziegler, Director, Division of 

Regulations, Legislation, and 

Interpretation, Wage and Hour Division, 

U.S. Department of Labor, Room S– 

3502, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20210; telephone: (202) 

693–0406 (this is not a toll-free 

number). Copies of this notice may be 

obtained in alternative formats (Large 

Print, Braille, Audio Tape or Disc), upon 

request, by calling (202) 693–0023 (not 

a toll-free number). TTY/TDD callers 

may dial toll-free (877) 889–5627 to 

obtain information or request materials 

in alternative formats. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background: The Migrant and 

Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection 

Act (MSPA) provides that no person 

shall engage in any farm labor 

contracting activity for any money or 

valuable consideration paid or promised 

to be paid, unless such person has a 

certificate of registration from the 

Secretary of Labor specifying which 

farm labor contracting activities such 

person is authorized to perform. See 29 

U.S.C. 1802(7), 1811(a); 29 CFR 500.1(c), 

500.20(i), 500.40. The MSPA also 

provides that a Farm Labor Contractor 

(FLC) shall not hire, employ, or use any 

individual to perform farm labor 

contracting activities unless such 

individual has a certificate of 

registration as a FLC or a certificate of 

registration as a Farm Labor Contractor 

Employee (FLCE) of the FLC that 

authorizes the activity for which such 

individual is hired, employed or used. 

29 U.S.C. 1811(b); 29 CFR 500.1(c). 

Form WH–530 is an application used to 

obtain a Farm Labor Contractor License. 

This information collection is currently 

approved for use through August 31, 

2015. 

The Migrant and Seasonal 

Agricultural Worker Protection Act 

(MSPA) section 401 (29 U.S.C. 1841) 

requires, subject to certain exceptions, 

all Farm Labor Contractors (FLCs), 

Agricultural Employers (AGERs), and 

Agricultural Associations (AGASs) to 

ensure that any vehicle they use or 

cause to be used to transport or drive 

any migrant or seasonal agricultural 

worker conforms to safety and health 

standards prescribed by the Secretary of 

Labor under the MSPA and with other 

applicable Federal and State safety 

standards. These MSPA safety standards 

address the vehicle, driver, and 

insurance. The Wage and Hour Division 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 25, 2015 / Notices 15823 

(WHD) has created Forms WH–514, 

WH–514a, and WH–515, which allow 

FLC applicants to verify to the WHD 

that the vehicles used to transport 

migrant/seasonal agricultural workers 

meet the MSPA vehicle safety standards 

and that anyone who drives such 

workers meets the Act’s minimum 

physical requirements. The WHD uses 

the information in deciding whether to 

authorize the FLC/FLCE applicant to 

transport/drive any migrant/seasonal 

agricultural worker(s) or to cause such 

transportation. Form WH–514 is used to 

verify that any vehicle used or caused 

to be used to transport any migrant/

seasonal agricultural worker(s) meets 

the Department of Transportation (DOT) 

safety standards. When the adopted 

DOT rules do not apply, FLC applicants 

seeking authorization to transport any 

migrant/seasonal agricultural workers 

use Form WH–514a to verify that the 

vehicles meet the DOL safety standards 

and, upon the vehicle meeting the 

required safety standards, the form is 

completed. Form WH–515 is a doctor’s 

certificate used to document that a 

motor vehicle driver or operator meets 

the minimum DOT physical 

requirements that the DOL has adopted. 

This information collection is currently 

approved for use through August 31, 

2015. As part of this renewal, the 

Department proposes to make revisions 

to the Forms WH–514, WH–514a, WH– 

515, and WH–530. 

II. Review Focus: The DOL is 

particularly interested in comments 

that: 

* Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

* Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

* Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

* Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submissions 

of responses. 

III. Current Actions: The DOL seeks to 

extend the information collection 

requests for the Application for a Farm 

Labor Contractor or Farm Labor 

Contractor Employee Certificate of 

Registration; Motor Vehicle Safety for 

Transportation of Migrant and Seasonal 

Agricultural Workers and the Doctor’s 

Certification (minimum physical 

requirements to drive a vehicle). 

Additionally, DOL seeks the approval of 

the revisions of the subject information 

collection requirements in the Farm 

Labor Contractor/Farm Labor Contractor 

Employee Application (WH–530), 

revisions to the Vehicle Mechanical 

Inspection Reports for Transportation 

Subject to Department of Labor Safety 

Requirements (WH–514a form), 

revisions to the Vehicle Mechanical 

Inspection Report for Transportation 

Subject to Department of Transportation 

Requirements (WH–514 form), and 

revisions to the Doctor’s Certificate, 

(WH–515 form). 

Type of Review: Revision and 

Extension. 

Agency: Wage and Hour Division. 

Titles: Application for a Farm Labor 

Contractor or a Farm Labor Contractor 

Employee Certificate of Registration; 

Vehicle Mechanical Inspection Report 

for Transportation Subject to 

Department of Transportation 

Requirements; Vehicle Mechanical 

Inspection Report for Transportation 

Subject to Department of Labor Safety 

Standards; MSPA Doctor’s Certificate. 

OMB Control Number: 1235–0016. 

Agency Numbers: Forms WH–514, 

WH–514a, WH–515, WH–530. 

Affected Public: Businesses or other 

for-profits, Farms. 

Respondents: 23,196. 

Total Annual responses: 23,196. 

Estimated Total Burden Hours: 9,334. 

Estimated Time per Response: 5 

minutes for the vehicle mechanical 

inspection reports (WH–514 or WH– 

514a) and 20 minutes for the MSPA 

Doctor’s Certification (WH–515) and 30 

minutes for the Farm Labor Contractor 

Application (WH–530). 

Frequency: On Occasion, but no more 

often than annual. 

Total Burden Cost (capital/startup): 

$0. 

Total Burden Cost (operating/

maintenance): $447,354. 

Dated: March 18, 2015. 

Mary Ziegler, 

Director, Division of Regulations, Legislation 

and Interpretation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06758 Filed 3–24–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4510–27–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Employment and Training 

Administration 

[TA–W–85,640] 

Covidien LP, North American Shared 

Services Group, Mansfield, 

Massachusetts; Notice of Negative 

Determination Regarding Application 

for Reconsideration 

By application dated December 11, 

2014, a separated worker requested 

administrative reconsideration of the 

Department of Labor’s negative 

determination regarding eligibility to 

apply for worker adjustment assistance, 

applicable to workers and former 

workers of Covidien LP, North 

American Shared Services Group, 

Mansfield, Massachusetts (Subject 

Firm). The denial notice was signed on 

November 25, 2014, and the Notice of 

Determination was published in the 

Federal Register on December 10, 2014 

(79 FR 73338). 

Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) 

reconsideration may be granted under 

the following circumstances: 

(1) If it appears on the basis of facts 

not previously considered that the 

determination complained of was 

erroneous; 

(2) If it appears that the determination 

complained of was based on a mistake 

in the determination of facts not 

previously considered; or 

(3) If in the opinion of the Certifying 

Officer, a mis-interpretation of facts or 

of the law justified reconsideration of 

the decision. 

The initial investigation revealed that 

the subject firm does not produce an 

article within the meaning of Section 

222(a) or Section 222(b) of the Act. 

Rather, the investigation revealed that 

the workers’ firm supplied services 

related to administrative support and 

customer services. In order to be 

considered eligible to apply for 

adjustment assistance under Section 223 

of the Trade Act of 1974, the worker 

group seeking certification (or on whose 

behalf certification is being sought) 

must work for a ‘‘firm’’ or appropriate 

subdivision that produces an article. 

The definition of a firm includes an 

individual proprietorship, partnership, 

joint venture, association, corporation 

(including a development corporation), 

business trust, cooperative, trustee in 

bankruptcy, and receiver under decree 

of any court. 

In the request for reconsideration, the 

petitioner stated that the workers of the 

subject firm should be eligible for TAA 

because the subject firm shifted to a 

foreign country the supply of like or 


rljohnson on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES