alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06596**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  06596\06596_ CERTIFICATION STATEMENT.pdf Plant certification statement x 06596\06596_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06596\06596_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 06596\06596_Followup Questions1.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up x 06596\06596_Followup Response1.xls Draft Questions for Follow Up

06596\06596_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 06596\06596_PART A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06596\06596_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06596\06596_PART C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06596\06596_PART D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06596\06596_PART H.xls Plant submitted survey file x 06596\06596_telecon1.pdf Technical Review Correspondence x 06596\06596_telecon2.pdf Technical Review Correspondence

06596\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06596_OGS A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 06596\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06596_OGS A5-2 MAP-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06596\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06596_OGS A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06596\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06596_OGS C2-31 BD-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06596\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06596_OGS D2-3 Ash Pond Study.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 

### x 06596\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06596_OGS D3-1 D-1 and D-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06596\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\06596_ICR CoverLetter.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.8
 
                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
 
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and
appoints Robert E. Sulentic and William P. Leiser the true and lawful
attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him
and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998, and to sign any or all amendments to such
Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting
unto said attorney or attorneys-in-fact, each of them with or without the
others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing
requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all
intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorney or attorneys-in-fact or any of them or their
substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
 
                                       /s/ George L. Lippe
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           George L. Lippe
# C_2016084EN.01000801.xml

| 4.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/8

---

Call for applications 2016

Third Programme of the Union’s action in the field of health (2014-2020)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 84/03)

A call for applications ‘Health — 2016’ is launched today within the framework of the third Programme of the Union’s action in the field of health (2014-2020) (1).

1

This call for applications consists of:

| — | a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of project grants |
| --- | --- |

—

a call for proposals for the award of a financial contribution to specific actions in the form of project grants

Deadline for online submissions of the proposals is 2 June 2016.

All the information, including the Commission Decision of 1 March 2016 on the adoption of the work programme for 2016 for implementation of the third Programme of the Union’s action in the field of health (2014-2020), and on the selection, award and other criteria for financial contributions to the actions of this programme, are available on the website of the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency (Chafea) at the following address:

http://ec.europa.eu/chafea/

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 282/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2014 on the establishment of a third Programme for the Union’s action in the field of health (2014-2020) and repealing Decision No 1350/2007/EC (OJ L 86, 21.3.2014, p. 1).

1

---
September 2, 2015

MEMO to Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2011-0817

FROM: Sharon Nizich, US EPA

SUBJECT: Meeting with Portland Cement Association Members

A meeting was held August 10th 2015 to discuss errors found in the July 27th 2015 promulgated final 

amendments for the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Portland Cement 

Manufacturing Plants. No errors were discovered in the New Source Performance Standards, of the 

July 27th 2015 amendment.

In attendance:

US EPA

Sharon Nizich

Keith Barnett

Robin Segall

Stef Johnson

John Holmes, Portland Cement Association

Jim Wheeler, Emissions Monitoring Inc.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Deltic Timber Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statements (No. 333-34317, No. 333-76294, and No. 333-90026) on Form S-8 of Deltic Timber Corporation of our reports dated March 7, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Deltic Timber Corporation
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2005,
managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, which reports appear in the
December 31, 2005 annual report on Form 10-K of Deltic Timber Corporation.



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP         
|                     
|KPMG LLP             
|Shreveport, Louisiana
|March 9, 2006
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

GUILLERMO BARRETO-ORTIZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50452

D.C. No. 3:07-cr-02882-BEN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Guillermo Barreto-Ortiz appeals from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

The government seeks the dismissal of this appeal as untimely. Because 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 15-50452 

Barreto-Ortiz is a pro se prisoner, his notice of appeal (“NOA”) is deemed filed 

when it was delivered to prison authorities for forwarding to the court. See Fed. R.

App. P. 4(c)(1). The record reflects, and the government does not dispute, that 

Barreto-Ortiz’s NOA was postmarked on October 15, 2015. Barreto-Ortiz’s NOA 

must, therefore, have been delivered to prison officials no later than that date. 

Because judgment was entered on October 1, 2015, his NOA was thus timely filed. 

See Fed. R. App. P. 4(b)(1)(A)(i), (c)(1). 

Barreto-Ortiz contends that the district court abused its discretion by 

denying his motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the 

Sentencing Guidelines. The district court acted within its discretion when it denied 

Barreto-Ortiz a sentence reduction based on its determination that he posed a threat 

to the public in light of the nature of the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10 cmt. 

n.1(B); United States v. Lightfoot, 626 F.3d 1092, 1096 (9th Cir. 2010). 

AFFIRMED.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600312

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

FRANK A. COSTA III

Private (E-1), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Colonel James K. Carberry, USMC.

For Appellant: Major Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 30 November 2016

_________________________

Before MARKS, FULTON, and WHITSON, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Order entered December 1, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00986-CR

WINDELL STOKES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 422nd Judicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 15-50472-422F

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal, which we abated November 9, 2016 to allow the trial 

court an opportunity to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief, originally due 

October 16, 2016, had not been filed. The hearing has not been held, but appellant has filed his 

brief along with an extension motion explaining why the brief had not been filed. We GRANT

appellant’s motion and ORDER the brief tendered to the Clerk of the Court November 28, 2016 

filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 61 (Tuesday, March 31, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07253]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-335, OMB Control No. 3235-0381]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form 40-F.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved 
collection of information discussed below.
    Form 40-F (17 CFR 249.240f) is used by certain Canadian issuers to 
register a class of securities pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act'')(15 U.S.C. 78l) or as 
an annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act 
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)). The information required in the Form 40-F 
is used by investors in making investment decisions with respect to the 
securities of such Canadian companies. We estimate that Form 40-F takes 
approximately 429.93 hours per response and is filed by approximately 
160 respondents. We estimate that 25% of the 429.93 hours per response 
(107.48 hours) is prepared by the issuer for a total reporting burden 
of 17,197 (107.48 hours per response x 160 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this 
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov . 
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and 
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, 
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office 
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#adfec5cccad8cbd9ccf2ecc5c0c8c9edc2c0cf83c8c2dd83cac2db"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="297a41484e5c4f5d48766841444c4d6946444b074c4659074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email 
to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4c1c1e0d13012d25202e23340c3f292f622b233a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="92c2c0d3cddff3fbfef0fdead2e1f7f1bcf5fde4">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 
days of this notice.

    Dated: March 25, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07253 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2016114EN.01000201.xml

| 31.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 114/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 114/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

30 March 2016

(2016/C 114/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1324 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4531 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2420 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0913 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4300 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,075 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,29 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2538 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4623 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2140 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4766 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4755 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7810 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6356 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5311 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 293,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9129 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3366 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5168 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 004,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4502 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,056 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,7842 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,894 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1275 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5281 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,1760 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1324

JPY

Japanese yen

127,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4531

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78580

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2420

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0913

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4300

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,075

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,29

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2538

RON

Romanian leu

4,4623

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2140

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4766

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4755

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7810

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6356

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5311

KRW

South Korean won

1 293,67

ZAR

South African rand

16,9129

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3366

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5168

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 004,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4502

PHP

Philippine peso

52,056

RUB

Russian rouble

76,7842

THB

Thai baht

39,894

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1275

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5281

INR

Indian rupee

75,1760

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Ramsay vs. Davis.

*Practice*— Meeersdl *of Judgment*— Five *per cent, damages.*

1. A judgment will not be reversed because no notice of trial had been served on the party against whom it was rendered, unless there was a motion to set it aside on that ground.

2. The appeal in this case having manifestly been taken for delay, the judgment is affirmed with five per cent, damages, *in addition*to the seven per cent, usually allowed.

ARPEAD from the Circuit Court for *Mikvautcee*County.

*I. P. Walker,*for appellant.

*B.*Mariner, for respondent.

Cole, J.

"We are furnished with no briefs by the appellant, and we are therefore ignorant of the points upon which he relies for a reversal of the judgment. Neither is there any bill of exceptions. The printed case states that there was no notice of trial served. This objection is not sustained by the record and papers returned to this court. But even if it were true that no notice of trial was given, the defendant should have moved in the court below to set aside the judgment on that ground. "W"e think the appeal was manifestly taken for delay, and we there*32fore afñrm tire judgment with fiye per cent, damages in addition to tire seven percent, damages given on affirmance'of judgments.

*By the Oourt.*— Ordered accordingly.
# C_2015382EN.01000501.xml

| 17.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 November 2015

(2015/C 382/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0723 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4610 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3206 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0791 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3050 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,031 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,90 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2408 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4387 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0922 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5110 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4293 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3109 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6554 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5253 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 257,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4300 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8330 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 776,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7036 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,644 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,7850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,565 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1144 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9456 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,7613 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0723

JPY

Japanese yen

132,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4610

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70580

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3206

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0791

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3050

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,031

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,90

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2408

RON

Romanian leu

4,4387

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0922

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5110

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4293

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3109

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6554

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5253

KRW

South Korean won

1 257,58

ZAR

South African rand

15,4300

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8330

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 776,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7036

PHP

Philippine peso

50,644

RUB

Russian rouble

70,7850

THB

Thai baht

38,565

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1144

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9456

INR

Indian rupee

70,7613

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
TS-CKHI02



### Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical Substance
L 

### SERVED: December 21, 2016

# OEI'~~~~~~~B. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION**\R~rto:>** OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## ll\\ t)f.t 

## 22 

## p 

# z: Zb WASHINGTON, DC 

## {)0Ct\E1 oPERl\1\0NS In The Matter Of: ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2013-1082 Ridan Investments, Inc. ) ) Case No. 2012S0700133 Respondent )



### DISMISSAL ORDER
On December 15, 2016, the Respondent filed a Withdrawal ofRequest for Hearing, stating that the parties had reached a settlement inthis matter. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, a party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge at any time before or during a hearing. Upon such withdrawal, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the case withprejudice.


### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. These proceedings are dismissed with prejudice. 2. The prehearing conferenced scheduled for January 12, 2017 is cancelled. 3. The hearing scheduledto begin onJanuary 24, 2017 is cancelled.

Attachment: Service List DOUGLAS M. RAWALD Administrative LawJudgeSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

ONE COPY Lawrence M. Burek, Respondent's Counsel 550 North Parkcenter Drive, Suite 204 SantaAna, CA92705 TEL: 714-564-9033 FAJ(: 714-564-1685 Charles Raley, Complainant's Counsel Enforcement Division, Western Team Federal Aviation Administration P.O. Box 92007 Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 TEL: 310-725-7108 FAJ(: 310-725-6816 The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAJ(: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2013-1082 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Exhibit 32. 1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



The following certification shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for the period ended
September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:



(1) the accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated for the periods presented therein.



Date: November 9, 2005



/s/ Richard K. WilliamsRichard K. WilliamsChief Executive Officer




Date: November 9, 2005



/s/ Brian R. McDonaldBrian R. McDonaldChief Financial Officer




A signed
original of the above certification has been provided to Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated and will be retained by Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.