alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2689 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2689

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure that children 
  in foster care who are placed in a qualified residential treatment 
                   program are eligible for Medicaid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            August 10, 2021

  Mr. Burr (for himself and Mrs. Feinstein) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure that children 
  in foster care who are placed in a qualified residential treatment 
                   program are eligible for Medicaid.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Medicaid Continuity for 
Children in Foster Care Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE WHO ARE PLACED IN A 
              QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PROGRAM FROM THE MEDICAID 
              IMD EXCLUSION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1905(a)(31)(B) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)(31)(B)) is amended by inserting ``and services 
provided to any individual who is a child in foster care under the 
responsibility of a State who has been placed in a child care 
institution that is a qualified residential treatment program (as 
defined in section 472(k)(4)), without regard to whether payments are 
made on behalf of such child under section 472'' after ``section 
1915(l)''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 1, 2021, and shall apply with respect to items 
and services furnished in calendar quarters beginning on or after that 
date.
                                 <all>
```
EX-4.2





 Exhibit 4.2 

WKN: 566480 
 ISIN: DE0005664809 

Ordnungsnummer: 43 
 [●]
Stückaktien 
 Evotec SE 

Hamburg 
 Globalurkunde

 über [●] auf den Inhaber lautende Stammaktien in Form von Stückaktien 

Stückenummern: 171.192.909 bis [●] 

Der Inhaber dieser Globalurkunde ist mit [●] Stückaktien an der Evotec SE, Hamburg, nach Maßgabe der Satzung der Gesellschaft als
Aktionär beteiligt. 
 Die Anzahl der in dieser Globalurkunde verbrieften und begebenen Aktien ergibt sich aus der aktuellen EDV-basierten Depotdokumentation der Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt am Main. 
 Diese Globalurkunde ist
ausschließlich zur Verwahrung bei Clearstream Banking AG, Frankfurt am Main, bestimmt. 
 Zu dieser Globalurkunde wurde kein Globalgewinnanteilschein
ausgefertigt. 
 Die in dieser Globalurkunde verbrieften Aktien sind ab Beginn des Geschäftsjahres, für das zum Zeitpunkt der Ausübung des
Bezugsrechts noch kein Beschluss der Hauptversammlung über die Verwendung des Bilanzgewinns gefasst worden ist, gewinnberechtigt. 
 Hamburg, im
September 2021 
 Evotec SE 
 vertreten
durch 
  

							
		 	Dr. Werner Lanthaler / CEO	  	Ralph Enno Spillner / CFO
#### Remlinger vs. Weyker.

*Liability of deputy sheriff.*

For a trespass under color of process, a *deputy*sheriff is liable to the party injured.

ERROR to the Circuit Court for *Ozaukee,*County.

-The action below was by *JRemlinger*against *Weyker,*for the value of a horse which the latter, as deputy sheriff, levied upon and sold, under an execution in his hands against *JRemlinger.*The plaintiff claimed, and introduced evidence tending to show, that the horse was exempt from execution under the statute. The jury were instructed that “the sheriff, and not the deputy, is liable, where the deputy does a wrong, having a legal instrument in his possession,” and that for this reason they must find for the defendant. Verdict and judgment accordingly; and the plaintiff sued out his writ of error.

*Hugh Canning,*for plaintiff in error.

*Foster £ Turner,*for defendant in error.

Coke, J.

.The court instructed the jury, among other *384things, that the sheriff, and not the deputy, was liable where the deputy does a wrong having a legal instrument in his possession. We have not been referred to any authority in support of this proposition, and upon principle it seems to us erroneous. If a deputy sheriff seizes, under an execution, property of a third person, or property exempt by law, we see no reason why he should not be liable for his acts. True, the' law makes the sheriff liable in a civil action for any default, misconduct or delinquency in his office, whether the act or default was committed or suffered by the sheriff himself or by any deputy. But it is likewise true, that the aggrieved party may bring his action directly against the deputy, if he chooses. The deputy is certainly liable for his wrongful acts. Where a recovery is had against the sheriff for the default of his deputy, the sheriff ordinarily has his action over against the deputy, unless the latter has. acted under his express direction and authority.

In this case, the wrong complained of was committed by the deputy. • He is legally bound to answer for it in damages, as the sheriff himself would have been at the election of the party injured. About this, it seems to us, there can be no doubt.

i *By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and a new trial awarded.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Immer Jonathan a/k/a Immer Perez * From the 35th District Court

a/k/a Immer Najera, of Brown County,

 Trial Court No. CR22631.

Vs. No. 11-14-00318-CR * November 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that 

there is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this 

court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# C_2014391EN.01003001.xml

| 6.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/30

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

2014/C 391/05

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

EPSO/AD/294/14 — Administrators (AD 6) in the field of data protection.

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 391 A of 6 November 2014.

C 391 A of 6 November 2014

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
{"id":12713,"count":67,"description":"Come get curious with NASA. As an official NASA podcast, Curious Universe brings you mind-blowing science and space adventures you won't find anywhere else. Explore the cosmos alongside astronauts, scientists, engineers, and other top NASA experts who are achieving remarkable feats in science, space exploration, and aeronautics. Learn something new about the wild and wonderful universe we share. All you need to get started is a little curiosity. \r\n\r\nNASA's Curious Universe is an official NASA podcast hosted by Padi Boyd and Jacob Pinter. Discover more original NASA shows at nasa.gov\/podcasts","link":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/podcasts\/curious-universe\/","name":"NASA's Curious Universe","slug":"curious-universe","taxonomy":"series","meta":[],"rss_feeds":{"spotify":"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/show\/5NT0kUEUIdS5FxotBPJvMX","apple":"https:\/\/podcasts.apple.com\/us\/podcast\/nasas-curious-universe\/id1505624059","google":"https:\/\/podcasts.google.com\/feed\/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubmFzYS5nb3YvcnNzL2R5bi9jdXJpb3VzLXVuaXZlcnNlLnJzcw","soundcloud":"https:\/\/soundcloud.com\/nasa\/sets\/nasas-curious-universe-podcast","drupal":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/rss\/dyn\/curious-universe.rss","native":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/feeds\/podcasts\/curious-universe"},"endpoint":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series\/12713","exclude_from_main":false,"featured_media":438502,"featured_image":{"file":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/03\/nasascuriousuniverselogo.png","alt":"NASA's Curious Universe illustration"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series\/12713"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/taxonomies\/series"}],"wp:post_type":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/podcast?series=12713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              OCT-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JAN-31-2000
<CASH>                                         3,301
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,301
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,650
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       67
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,388)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   (4,321)
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               30
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               4,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,351)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,351)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,351)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.0)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (.0)



</TABLE>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determine d that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-31077 Summary Calendar

In The Matter of: PHIL H. NUGENT, Debtor,

CARL A. DENGEL, Appellant,

VERSUS RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, as receiver for Pelican

Homestead and Savings Association, Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

(96-CV-428) April 4, 1997

Before WISDOM, KING, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Appellant Carl A. Dengel, trustee, appeals the dis trict

court’s affirmance of the b ankruptcy court’s decision. As an1 Fed. R. App. P. 3(c).

2 Id.

3 In re: Delta Towers, Ltd ., 924 F.2d 74, 76 (5th Cir. 1991); In re: Missionary Baptist Foundation of America , 71 2 F.2d 206, 209 (5th Cir. 1983).
2 initial matter this court must consider a defect in petitioner’s
Notice of Appeal. The Notice of Appeal states that “Carl Dengel as

trustee of Phil Nugent wishes to appeal

. . .” ,but in the district

court’s docket entry both Phil Nugent and Lillian Eccles Nugent are listed as debtors. Also, petitioner’s brief to this court states
“Carl Dengel, as trustee for Phil & Lillian Nugent”. “A notice of appeal must specify the party or parties taking the appeal by naming each appellant i n either the caption or the body of the
notice of appeal.” 1 However, “[a]n appeal will not be dismissed for informality of form or title of the notice of appeal, or for failure to name a party whose intent to appeal is otherwise clear
from the notice.” 2 In the circumstances of this case, we find that the trustee intended to appeal on behalf of both Phil and Lillian Nugent; therefore, we consider the merits of petitioner’s appeal.

We re view the bankruptcy court’s findings of fact for clear

error and conclusions of law de novo . 3 We have reviewed the record
and the briefs of the parties. For the reasons set forth in the
district court’s Orde r and Reasons, the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Yu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
of the Company as of June 30, 2006 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2006.



/s/    CAROL
YUCarol Yu, Chief Financial OfficerAugust 8, 2006
# C_2016034EN.01001701.xml

| 29.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/17

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.7868 — Tönnies/Tican)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 34/09)

| 1. | On 22 January 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Tönnies International Holding GmbH, belonging to the Tönnies group (‘Tönnies’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Tican A/S (‘Tican’, Denmark) by way of purchase of shares. |
| --- | --- |

1.

On 22 January 2016, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) by which Tönnies International Holding GmbH, belonging to the Tönnies group (‘Tönnies’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Tican A/S (‘Tican’, Denmark) by way of purchase of shares.

1

| 2. | Both Tönnies and Tican are active internationally in the food industry, specialized in the slaughtering, deboning and processing of meat as well as the sale of fresh meat and meat products. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Both Tönnies and Tican are active internationally in the food industry, specialized in the slaughtering, deboning and processing of meat as well as the sale of fresh meat and meat products.

| 3. | On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved. |
| --- | --- |

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

| 4. | The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.
  Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7868 — Tönnies/Tican, to the following address:





  European Commission |
| --- | --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

4.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301), by email to COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu or by post, under reference M.7868 — Tönnies/Tican, to the following address:

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RONALD NORRIS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-2875

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2016

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Putnam County,

Clyde E. Wolfe, Judge.

Ronald Norris, Bristol, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Norris appeals the summary denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal 

Procedure 3.800(a) motion in which he alleged that his written sentence conflicted with 

the trial court’s oral pronouncement. The record before us does not contain the transcript 

of the sentencing hearing, nor was it attached to Norris’s motion or the trial court’s order. 

Accordingly, we remand the case to the trial court to determine if the transcript is in the 

record. If it is, the trial court shall either grant the relief Norris seeks or attach portions of 

the sentencing transcript that refute his claim. If the transcript is not in the record, Norris’s
2

motion shall be denied without prejudice to allow him to file an amended motion with the 

transcript attached. Beard v. State, 27 So. 3d 186, 188 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

REVERSED AND REMANDED. 

LAWSON, C.J., and TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.
# C_2014147EN.01000301.xml

| 16.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 May 2014

2014/C 147/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3659 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4644 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81520 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9740 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2227 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1050 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,440 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,62 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1792 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4328 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8466 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4589 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4845 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5882 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5786 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7108 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 401,78 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1337 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5090 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5910 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 599,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4064 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,797 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,4450 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,333 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0197 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6440 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,9842 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3659

JPY

Japanese yen

139,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4644

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81520

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9740

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2227

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1050

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,440

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,62

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1792

RON

Romanian leu

4,4328

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8466

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4589

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4845

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5882

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5786

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7108

KRW

South Korean won

1 401,78

ZAR

South African rand

14,1337

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5090

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5910

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 599,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4064

PHP

Philippine peso

59,797

RUB

Russian rouble

47,4450

THB

Thai baht

44,333

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0197

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6440

INR

Indian rupee

80,9842

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
## FINAL RULE TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD):

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STAN DARDS FOR COMMERCIAL AND

INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

Refrigerated Bottled or Canne d Beverage Vending Machines

August 7, 2009

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commerci al Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.,

and

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
[491ll-13-

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14CFRPart39 OC/C)I I

(Docket No. FAA-2010-+++!;t>irectorate Identifier 2010-NM-I07-AD]

RlN 2120-AA64

Ainvorthiness Directives; LeaIjet Inc. Model 45 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new aiIworthiness directive (AD) for all Learje

incorrect routing, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. This

proposed AD results from reports of wire damage on the pilot and copilot circuit bre ~er

panels caused by a shan circuit between chafed wires. We are proposing this AD to

detect and correct damaged or misrouted wires" which could result in a short circuit d

flOU'l,,,,, 5'''"'''-

consequent accumulation of toxic gases in tbe crew compartment and the loss ofsyst ms I t"""'LSlSIG"ATU~~

associated with the wiring (including fire suppr1ession function for one engine and

~"

essential avionics systems).

DATES: We must receive comments on !his proposed AD by [INSERT DATE 45

DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICA nON IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].

ADDRESSES: You may send corrunents by any of the following methods:

AOI,ltl"G SY><lIOl,.

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://wv.rw.regulations.gov. Follow the

instructions faT submitting c~mments .

• Fax: 202-493-2251.

FAA Form 1360-14.1 (6·89) OFFICIAL ALE COPy
14910-I3-PJ

IlEPARTII'1ENT O~~tRANSPORTATlON I

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 3.9

(Docket No. FM-2010-++++j Dir~ctoratc Identifier 201~-NM-I07-ADI

RIN 2120-AA64 I

Ain\"orthincss Dircctiv,cs; Learjet Inc. Model 45 Airplanes

· - I AGEN(;Y: Federal Aviation A:dministration (~AA), DOT.

· ,

ACUON: Notice-of proposed ruler-naking (NPR1vf).

SUMMARY: We propose 19adopt a nc\~' airwbrthiness directive (AD) for'all Learjet

Inc. Model 45 airplanes. 1111Sproposed AD woJl1d.reQUire a ,general visu~l in{l,pection to

detect wires locat~d near the' circuit breaker paJ,cl mOlmting bracket [or damage and

incorrect rouJing, and rClatcd invesiigntivc and !oITec;i~'e actions if necessary. This

'proposed AD~Jestilts from reports of wire dama~e on the pilot and copilot ~ircuit b[eake

panels eallsed by a sh~f( bireuit betweell ehaled lWires. We are pcoposing this AD to

detect and correct damaged or mlsrouted wires. f\'hICh could result Hl a short CirCUitan

cQnsequ~nt.flccumul~f~of1 ofloxl(: gases in the c ew compartment and ~hcJoss of system.

associated with the wiring (including fire sllPpr~sion function for one engine arid

essential avionics systems).

~ATES:. We m.llS! rccciye COIl}ments on this prlPo~cdAD by [I1\lSERT DATE 45

DAYS AI'TER DATE qF PUBLiCATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]~

AnD~ESSES: You nU\Y,send cbmmcnls byani of the followin.g methods:

• Federal eRulefriaRing Portal: Go 10 http://www.rcgulations.gov. Follow the

instruCtions for sllbmiHing comments.

• Fax: z02-49:3-225l.

NT!

FAil Form 1350·14.1 (6..e9)

I

OFFIC!/,L fll.E cpr1Y