alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 30, 2016

d1121

Order 

Clerk

November 30, 2016

153097

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153097

COA: 328689

Wayne CC: 92-002001-FH

KEVIN HARDEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2015 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
# C_2016236EN.01000301.xml

| 30.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 June 2016

(2016/C 236/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1090 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,85 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4376 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82550 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4311 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0854 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3065 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,114 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 316,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4261 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5253 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2157 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4911 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4407 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6041 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5565 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4951 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 283,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,6016 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3680 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5273 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 577,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4594 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,106 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,0452 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,028 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6216 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,7331 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,9693 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1090

JPY

Japanese yen

113,85

DKK

Danish krone

7,4376

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82550

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4311

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0854

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3065

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,114

HUF

Hungarian forint

316,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4261

RON

Romanian leu

4,5253

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2157

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4911

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4407

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6041

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5565

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4951

KRW

South Korean won

1 283,15

ZAR

South African rand

16,6016

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3680

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5273

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 577,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4594

PHP

Philippine peso

52,106

RUB

Russian rouble

71,0452

THB

Thai baht

39,028

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6216

MXN

Mexican peso

20,7331

INR

Indian rupee

74,9693

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001022657
<NAME> AETNA INDUSTRIES
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           4,011
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   33,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                       510
<INVENTORY>                                      8,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,081
<PP&E>                                          82,502
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,062
<BONDS>                                         85,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,140)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   129,058
<SALES>                                        211,462
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,462
<CGS>                                          180,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  180,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,644
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,022
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,798
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,105
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,963
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,153
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,540
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DEVELE LAMAR REID,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 335 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 21

- 00138

- CV
IN RE Tara BOVE and Kevin Bove , Relator s Original Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Beth Watkins , Justice Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 28, 2021
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relators have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for temporary relief. We may issue writs of mandamus when “agr eeable to the principles of law regulating those writs.”

T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE § 22.221(b). For mandamus, a relator has the burden to file a petition and record
show ing “ the trial court abused its discretion and that no adequate appellate remedy exists .” In re
H

.E.B. Grocery Co., L.P. , 492 S.W.3d 300, 302 (Tex. 2016) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Having reviewed the petition and documents included in the appendix, we conclude relators have not satisfied their burden. Accordingly, we deny the petition and motio n for temporary relief. See
T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(a).
PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020

- CI

- 22591 , styled In the Interest of A.L.F., a Child , pending in the 225th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable David A. Canales presiding (denying the motion to strike ) and the Honorable Rosie Alvarado (denying the motion to reconsider).
#### Fehring vs. Swineford.

*Notice of Appeal.*

1. An appeal from a judgment must be dismissed if it appears that when. notice of such appeal was given, the judgment had not been entered.

2. A single notice of appeal from both an order and a judgment is bad.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Fond du Lac*County.

*George JB.*Frances, for plaintiff and respondent,

moved to dismiss the appeal.

*Knowles & Babcock, contra.*

Dixon, C. J.

Counsel for the plaintiff objects that the appeal taken by the defendant is not valid, and should be dismissed.' The notice is of an appeal “ from the judgment and order of the circuit court, entered on the twenty-fifth day of January, 1873.” The undertaking is as upon an appeal from a judgment. The objection urged is, that no judgment had been entered at the time the appeal, was taken. An examina*551tion of the record shows no judgment; and of course the appeal must fail on that ground, if there was no other defect. But the notice of appeal is faulty iii being both from a judgment and an order.* Such a notice is badand the appeal cannot, for this reason as well as the other, be sustained. *Noble v. Strachan,*32 Wis., 314, and cases cited.

*By the*Court.— Appeal dismissed.

*

 The order referred to *seems*to have been one denying a new trial, after a verdict for the plaintiff. Rep.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Joseph Y. Liu, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Oplink Communications, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financing reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: September 14, 2007              /s/ Joseph Y. Liu   Joseph Y. Liu   President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 21****SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**     **Jurisdiction of****Subsidiary** **Incorporation**   Midway Interactive Inc. DelawareMidway Home Entertainment Inc. DelawareMidway Games West Inc. (formerly, Atari Games Corporation) CaliforniaMidway Games Sales Corporation BarbadosMidway Games (Europe) GmbH GermanyMidway Games Limited United KingdomMidway Amusement Games, LLC Delaware (LLC)Midway Sales Company, LLC Delaware (LLC)Midway Home Studios Inc. DelawareK. K. Midway Games JapanMidway Games Canada Corp. CanadaSurreal Software Inc. WashingtonMidway Studios – Austin Inc. TexasMidway Studios – Los Angeles Inc. CaliforniaMidway Games GmbH GermanyMidway Australia Holdings Pty Ltd AustraliaRatbag Holdings Pty Ltd AustraliaMidway Studios – Australia Pty Ltd AustraliaMidway Games – Australia Pty Ltd AustraliaMidway Studios Development – Australia Pty Ltd AustraliaRatbag Studios Pty Ltd AustraliaRatbag Productions Pty Ltd AustraliaMidway Studios – Newcastle Limited United KingdomMidway Games SAS France
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

JEFFREY D. HILL,

 Petitioner

 v.

GROUNDWATER AND

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.,

 Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 357 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 6th day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
# C_2016167EN.01000301.xml

| 11.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 May 2016

(2016/C 167/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1439 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,51 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4401 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78860 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2575 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1018 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,028 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4234 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5035 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3166 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5266 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4665 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8775 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6577 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5531 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 333,95 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0751 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4410 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5150 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 260,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5819 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,171 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,0559 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,191 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0282 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,2155 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,0745 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1439

JPY

Japanese yen

122,51

DKK

Danish krone

7,4401

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78860

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2575

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1018

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,028

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4234

RON

Romanian leu

4,5035

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3166

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5266

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4665

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8775

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6577

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5531

KRW

South Korean won

1 333,95

ZAR

South African rand

17,0751

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4410

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5150

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 260,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5819

PHP

Philippine peso

54,171

RUB

Russian rouble

75,0559

THB

Thai baht

40,191

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0282

MXN

Mexican peso

20,2155

INR

Indian rupee

76,0745

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016108EN.01000101.xml

| 23.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7928 — RPC Group/GCS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 108/01)

On 11 March 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7928. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7928. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016190EN.01000701.xml

| 28.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/7

---

Information to be provided pursuant to Article 5(2)

Establishment of a European Grouping Of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC)

(Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 (OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 19))

(2016/C 190/08)

I.1.   Name, address and contact point

Name, address and contact point

Leon-Bragança European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation

Registered office:

Registered office

Contact point: Juan Martínez Majo

Contact point

Telephone number: +34 987292102/+34 987292149

Telephone number

Email: presidencia@dipuleon.es

Email

I.2.   Duration of the grouping:

Duration of the grouping:

Duration of the grouping: Indefinite period

Duration of the grouping

Date of registration:

Date of registration

Date of publication:

Date of publication

II.   OBJECTIVES

OBJECTIVES

| — | In keeping with Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013, the objective of the Leon-Bragança EGTC will be to facilitate and promote cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation between its members, i.e. between Leon Provincial Council and Bragança Municipal Council. |
| --- | --- |

—

In keeping with Article 1 of Regulation (EC) No 1082/2006, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1302/2013, the objective of the Leon-Bragança EGTC will be to facilitate and promote cross-border, transnational and interregional cooperation between its members, i.e. between Leon Provincial Council and Bragança Municipal Council.

| — | Members will cooperate with the sole aim of strengthening the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

Members will cooperate with the sole aim of strengthening the economic, social and territorial cohesion of the Union.

III.   ADDITIONAL DETAILS CONCERNING THE NAME OF THE GROUPING

ADDITIONAL DETAILS CONCERNING THE NAME OF THE GROUPING

Abbreviation or acronym in Spanish: AECT León-Bragança

Abbreviation or acronym in Spanish

IV.   MEMBERS

MEMBERS

IV.1.   Total number of members in the grouping: 2

Total number of members in the grouping:

IV.2.   Nationalities of the members of the grouping: Spanish and Portuguese

Nationalities of the members of the grouping:

IV.3.   Member information

Member information

Leon Provincial Council

Postal address:

Postal address

Contact person: Juan Martínez Majo

Contact person

Telephone number: +34 987292102/+34 987292149

Telephone number

Internet address: presidencia@dipuleon.es/www.dipuleon.es

Internet address

Type of member: Local authority

Type of member

Municipality of Bragança

Postal address:

Postal address

Contact person: Hernâni Dias

Contact person

Telephone number: +351 273304216

Telephone number

Internet address: gap1@cm-braganca.pt/www.cm-braganca.pt

Internet address

Type of member: Local authorities

Type of member

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00766-CV

STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS,

Appellant

v.

Liliana DIAZ-MOORE,

Appellee

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-04661

Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

Opinion by: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 23, 2016

MOTION FOR REHEARING DENIED

Appellee Liliana Diaz-Moore has filed a motion for rehearing challenging this court’s 

disposition of the issues raised on appeal and requesting that this court clarify the scope of our 

remand. The motion for rehearing is denied; however, to the extent necessary given existing Texas 

Supreme Court precedent defining the scope of a remand in this context, this court’s judgment is 

clarified to limit the scope of the remand to a remand for a new trial on the issue of unliquidated 

damages. See Holt Atherton Indus., Inc. v. Heine, 835 S.W.2d 80, 86 (Tex. 1992) (noting 
04-15-00766-CV

- 2 -

appropriate disposition when an appellate court sustains a no evidence point after an uncontested 

hearing on unliquidated damages following a no-answer default judgment is a remand for a new 

trial on the issue of unliquidated damages); Trenton v. Hammitt, No. 04-10-00316-CV, 2010 WL 

5545423, at *3 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 29, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (same). This court’s 

opinion of October 26, 2016, remains unchanged.

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
EXHIBIT 13.1


CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Oded Bashan, as Chief Executive Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  April 11, 2012
By:  /s/ Oded Bashan

Oded Bashan

Chief Executive Officer of the Company