alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         35,021
<SECURITIES>                                   2,411
<RECEIVABLES>                                  48,355
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,324
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               108,165
<PP&E>                                         46,444
<DEPRECIATION>                                 9,471
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          61,074
<BONDS>                                        985
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       3,713
<OTHER-SE>                                     231,210
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,798
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               222,028
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  129,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               102,646
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             108
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,954)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (11,839)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (11,839)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.34)

<FN>
Amounts inapplicable or not disclosed as a separate line on the Statement of
Financial Position of Results of Operations are reported a 0 herein.
</FN>

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00383-CR

William Thomas Vaughn III

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 7

of Tarrant County (1338521)

November 23, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
# C_2015380EN.01000401.xml

| 14.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 380/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 380/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 November 2015

(2015/C 380/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0764 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,04 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4606 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70705 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3388 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0786 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3320 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,032 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,23 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2429 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4452 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0960 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5077 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4322 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3429 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6483 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5305 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 257,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,4459 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8607 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6155 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 764,07 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7125 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,722 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,7143 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,643 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0847 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0620 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,2000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0764

JPY

Japanese yen

132,04

DKK

Danish krone

7,4606

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70705

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3388

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0786

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3320

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,032

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,23

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2429

RON

Romanian leu

4,4452

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0960

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5077

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4322

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3429

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6483

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5305

KRW

South Korean won

1 257,07

ZAR

South African rand

15,4459

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8607

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6155

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 764,07

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7125

PHP

Philippine peso

50,722

RUB

Russian rouble

71,7143

THB

Thai baht

38,643

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0847

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0620

INR

Indian rupee

71,2000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 OR 15D-14 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Richard R. Sorensen, Chief Financial Officer of Superior Consultant HoldingsCorporation, certify that:
     1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Superior ConsultantHoldings Corporation;
     2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
     3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
     4) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
          a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
          b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and
          c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
     5) The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
          a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
          b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: March 30, 2004 /s/ Richard R. Sorensen            Richard R. Sorensen        Chief Financial Officer
# OaT'OST'^looC ' 72?:i J Michae l D"Ambros e Arche r Daniel s Midlan dCompan y Senior Vice Presiden t

- Huma n Resource s 466 6 Fane s Parkway Decatur , I L6252 6 T 217.451.4045 F217.424.426 6 dambrose@admworld.co m

'- ^ r- o >

~ z e n C D •-•ir'S'' ^

'-/ ' J j 

## ^ S P rn-Rrr i 

### 2^^ ^ •.-_ J -r. ^

-J-. , o: : Denni s DeVan y Chief , Essentia l Ai rServic e Progra m U.S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse yAve , S E Washington , D

C 2059 0 Re : Docke t DO

T OST-2006-2392 9 Dea rMr . DeVany , AD M enthusiasticall ysupport s th e proposa l o f Multi-Aero , Inc . db a Ai rChoic e On e t o provid e Essentia l Ai rServic e fo rDecatur , IL . Ai rChoic e On e ha s simpl ydon e a wonderfu l jo b a s a n airlin e a t growin g passenge rridershi p i n th e nearl ytw o year s the yhav e bee n providin g ai r servic e i n Decatur . AD M employee s utiliz e an d enjo ytravelin g wit h Ai rChoic e On e thank s t o thei rChicag o O'Har e an d Lamber t St . Loui s connection s whic h mak e i t significantl yeasie rfo r catchin g connectin g flights . I n sayin g that , w e ar e als o offerin g ou rsuppor t fo ra 4 yea r agreemen t s o the yma ycontinu e t o buil d o n th e relationship s tha t hav e bee n forge d ove rth e pas t 2 years . Than k yo u fo ryou rkin d consideration . Sincerely , Michae l D'Ambros e
# C_2016269EN.01003701.xml

| 23.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/37

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 July 2016

(2016/C 269/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1014 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 116,86 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4390 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,84108 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4979 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0860 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3847 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,34 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3554 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4609 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3560 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4717 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4436 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5420 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5748 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4934 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,19 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,6920 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3500 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4863 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 445,45 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4696 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,836 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,0806 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,463 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6138 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,4913 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,8783 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1014

JPY

Japanese yen

116,86

DKK

Danish krone

7,4390

GBP

Pound sterling

0,84108

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4979

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0860

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3847

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,34

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3554

RON

Romanian leu

4,4609

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3560

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4717

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4436

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5420

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5748

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4934

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,19

ZAR

South African rand

15,6920

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3500

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4863

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 445,45

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4696

PHP

Philippine peso

51,836

RUB

Russian rouble

71,0806

THB

Thai baht

38,463

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6138

MXN

Mexican peso

20,4913

INR

Indian rupee

73,8783

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

CHARITY MARIE HILL, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 14-0740 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2005-012984-002

The Honorable Margaret R. Mahoney, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Lisa Marie Martin

Counsel for Respondent

Charity Marie Hill, Goodyear

Petitioner Pro Se

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge Jon W. Thompson delivered the decision of the Court, in which 

Presiding Judge Diane M. Johnsen and Judge Paul J. McMurdie joined.
STATE v. HILL

Decision of the Court

2

T H O M P S O N, Judge:

¶1 Petitioner Charity Marie Hill petitions this court for review 

from the summary dismissal of her successive notice of post-conviction 

relief. Hill argues each of her trial counsel were ineffective; her “of-right” 

post-conviction relief counsel was ineffective and that various errors arose 

in the course of sentencing. Hill also presents a number of issues she did 

not raise below.

¶2 We deny review. Hill could have raised the claims of 

ineffective assistance of trial counsel and the sentencing issues in her 

petition for post-conviction relief of-right in 2012. She could have raised 

the claims of ineffective assistance of her of-right post-conviction relief 

counsel in a timely second petition for post-conviction relief.1 Any claim a 

defendant could have raised in an earlier post-conviction relief proceeding 

is precluded. Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32.2(a). None of the exceptions under Rule 

32.2(b) apply. Finally, we do not consider the issues Hill presents for 

review but did not raise below. State v. Ramirez, 126 Ariz. 464, 467, 616 P.2d 

924, 927 (App. 1980); State v. Wagstaff, 161 Ariz. 66, 71, 775 P.2d 1130, 1135 

(App. 1988); State v. Bortz, 169 Ariz. 575, 577, 821 P.2d 236, 238 (App. 1991); 

Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32.9(c)(1)(ii).

¶3 We grant review, but deny relief.

 

1 The trial court was incorrect when it held there is no right to effective 

assistance of post-conviction relief counsel. Ineffective assistance of postconviction relief counsel is a cognizable claim for post-conviction relief 

when made against counsel who provided representation in an “of-right” 

post-conviction relief proceeding. State v. Pruett, 185 Ariz. 128, 131, 912 P.2d 

1357, 1360 (App. 1995).
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 23, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-1078

Lower Tribunal No. 10-34535

________________

Ricardo Aybar,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Dennis J.

Murphy, Judge.

Rasco Klock Perez Nieto, Hilton Napoleon, II, and Joseph P. Klock, Jr., for

appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jeffrey R. Geldens, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, FERNANDEZ and SCALES, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Ricardo Aybar, appeals the trial court’s order denying the

defendant’s motion to suppress his blood alcohol test results. The record does not
reflect a written order by the trial court finding that the suppression ruling would

be dispositive, nor is there a stipulation in the record that the ruling would be

dispositive. Consequently, this Court has no jurisdiction to review the matter, and

the appeal is dismissed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.140(b)(2)A)(i)1; Williams v. State,

194 So. 3d 511 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016); Pena v. State, 913 So. 2d 1203, 1205 (Fla. 4th

DCA 2005) (stating “[b]ecause we have concluded that the order on appeal was

not dispositive and the exception to the rule does not apply, we have no

jurisdiction to reach the merits of this case.”).

Dismissed.

1 Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(i) states:

(A) Pleas. A defendant may not appeal from a guilty or nolo contendere plea

except as follows:

(i) Reservation of Right to Appeal. A defendant who pleads guilty or nolo

contendere may expressly reserve the right to appeal a prior dispositive

order of the lower tribunal, identifying with particularity the point of law

being reserved.

2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David L. Osborn, the President of
Hudson's Grill International, Inc., certify that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | (Registrant)

HUDSON'S GRILL INTERNATIONAL,
INC.

By: s/s David L. Osborn

David L. Osborn, President

Date: May 31, 2007
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

f\sec\o01.070331
## E.O. 12866 Meeting on the Greenhouse Gas New Source **Performance Standard for Electric Generating Units Rule Tue 02/07/2012**  11:00 AM - 11:30 AM Attendance is for RobertJ Wayland Chair: **Mabel_E._Echols@omb.eop.gov** Location: 202 - 395 -6392; code 3862485 This entry has an alarm. The alarm will go off b efore the entry starts.

Required: Cass_R._Sunstein@omb.eop.gov, Kevin_F._Neyland@omb.eop.gov, Jeffrey_G_Weiss@omb.eop.gov,

Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov, Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov, Manisha_D_Patel@ceq.eop.gov, Michael_C._Clark@omb.eop.gov, John_S._MacNeil@omb.eop.gov, Kevin Culligan/DC/U SEPA/US, Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US 

### This meeting was requested by David Doniger, NRDC. Call - in number: 2 02 - 395 - 6392; code 3862485.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed
Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 333-22571 and No. 333-93209 and
Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 333-79759, each of Edge Petroleum
Corporation (the "Company"), of our summary report dated March 28, 2002 included
as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K in respect of our reserve
report relating to the oil and gas reserves and revenues of certain interests of
the Company as of December 31, 2001 and of the data extracted from such reports
appearing in "Items 1 and 2. "Business and Properties" under the caption "Oil
and Natural Gas Reserves" and in Supplementary Financial Information on Oil and
Natural Gas Exploration, Development and Production Activities (unaudited) in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K. We hereby consent to all references to such
reports and/or this firm in such Annual Report on Form 10-K and we hereby
consent to all references to such reports and/or to this firm in each such
Registration Statement, and further consent to our being named as an expert in
each such Registration Statement and in each Prospectus to which any such
Registration Statement relates.


                                           /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                               PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
                                               -------------------
                                               RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                               PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Houston, Texas
March 28, 2002
# C_2016031EN.01000102.xml

| 28.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7778 — Vattenfall/ENGIE/GASAG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 31/02)

On 8 December 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7778. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7778. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016141EN.01000101.xml

| 22.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 141/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 141/1

---

Inapplicability of the Regulation to a notified operation

(Case M.7940 — Netto/Grocery Store at Armitage Avenue Little Hulton)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 141/01)

On 26 February 2016, the Commission decided that the notified operation in the above case does not fall within the scope of the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) because it does not constitute a concentration within the meaning of Article 3 of the said Regulation. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(a) of the Regulation. The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7940. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7940. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---