alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SERVED JANUARY 11,2010 .,.., ^ ]Bf>;?FORTAllOH 

" ' *" • r-, ;• \ /"•. • ,•• ~ " 0 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 2 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

SMITH CABLE SYSTEMS, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP009AL0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0976 

PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 of the Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

... On or before June 15, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. If the parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely 

manner... 

jodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09AL0012 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430, 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Ronald G. Smith, President 

Smith Cable Systems, Inc. 

Through Counsel 

Brent R. Cole, Respondent's Counsel 

Marston & Cole, P.C. 

821 N Street, Suite 208 

Anchorage, AK 99501-2136 

TEL: 907-277-8001 

FAX: 907-277-8002 

Glerm H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7* Avenue, #14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5271 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
# C_2016130EN.01000601.xml

| 13.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 April 2016

(2016/C 130/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1396 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4434 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79840 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2138 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0874 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3515 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,030 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,38 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2923 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4708 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2274 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4882 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4674 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8371 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6540 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5354 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 302,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7396 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3632 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4890 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 917,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4273 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,517 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,6167 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,943 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0034 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,0248 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,6680 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1396

JPY

Japanese yen

123,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4434

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79840

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2138

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0874

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3515

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,030

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,38

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2923

RON

Romanian leu

4,4708

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2274

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4882

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4674

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8371

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6540

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5354

KRW

South Korean won

1 302,88

ZAR

South African rand

16,7396

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3632

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4890

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 917,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4273

PHP

Philippine peso

52,517

RUB

Russian rouble

75,6167

THB

Thai baht

39,943

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0034

MXN

Mexican peso

20,0248

INR

Indian rupee

75,6680

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Pegalow vs. The State.

*Sentence on Criminal*— l>y *whom pronounced,.*

Ajudgeoftbe circuit court may pronounce sentence upon a prisoner convicted before bis predecessor in office.

EEEOE to tbe Circuit Court for *Manitowoc*County.

*JE. Fox OooJc,*for plaintiff in error,

cited 1 Cbitty’s Or. Law, pp. 696, 699, 701, 704; 2 Hale’s P. C., 404-5.

*The Attorney General,*for tbe state.

Cole, *J.*

When this case was before tbe court at a former time (see 12 Wis., 534), we beld tbat tbe record did not sbow any judgment, and tbe cause was therefore remanded to tbe circuit court witb directions to proceed and render judgment upon tbe verdict. Tbis bas been done. In tbe mean time tbe circuit judge before whom tbe plaintiff in error was tried and convicted, bas gone out of office, and bas been succeeded by tbe present judge, wbo bas pronounced judgment upon tbe verdict in conformity to tbe directions of tbis court. And tbe only question now arising upon tbe record, wbicb we deem of sufficient importance to notice, is, whether tbe circuit judge bad power to pass sentence upon a prisoner convicted before bis predecessor in office. We think tbe circuit judge bad tbis power. Says Cbitty: “ Tbe King’s Bench, being tbe supreme court of criminal jurisdiction, may give judgment in every case, whether tbe indictment was originally taken there, or removed by *certiorari*from any inferior tribunal.” 1 Cbitty’s Crim. Law, p. 698. Hale says: “ If A. be indicted for felony before justices of tbe peace, oyer and terminer, or gaol delivery, and be convict by verdict or confession, if tbe record of conviction be removed into tbe King’s Bench by *certiorari,*and tbe prisoner also be removed thither b *j habeas corpus,*tbat court may give judgment upon tbat conviction, but there must be first a filing of tbe record in tbe King’s Bench, and a commitment of tbe prisoner to tbe custody of tbe marshal, and be must be called *62to say wbat be can, wby judgment should not be given against him, and thereupon judgment may be given.” 2 Pleas of the Crown, p. 401.

C. J. Stow remarks, in *Putnam v. Sweet,*1 Chand., 286, 335, that orn' circuit courts, made by the constitution superior courts of record, are vested with the united powers of the English King’s Bench, Common Pleas, Exchequer and Chancery; and this being so, the judges thereof undoubtedly have power to pass sentence upon a prisoner convicted before then predecessors in office. See section 3, chap. 119, R. S.

It is proper to add that the plaintiff in error was convicted of murder in the first degree, and the statute fixes the penalty for that crime, leaving nothing to the discretion of the court. Where a discretion was given, there might be some reason for saying that the judge who pronounced the sentence should be acquainted with the circumstances of the case as disclosed at the trial, in order to award the proper degree of punishment. But no such reason can apply here.

*By the Gourt.*— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
REF ID:A66580 

Colonel Wll. 11. Jm•ell• Jr. 

lhi.tal States Milit&r; ACaiaQ' 

IlepU'timlmt. ot Mathml&Uoa 

HMll-a 

ii-' Paint.• la Yolk 

~ Col.OMl ilGvs]l 1 

--· 21JAN1s;z 

!id.a Vill. be jast. a. sbOl-t note to acknowledge 1"808i~ oE 

1fRI" l.dter ot 11 J&\1&17 US2 m.t to Hf' that. a d9tia1l8CI Npl:r 

t.la'et.o will tl9 ant )"OU in a. few cltQa. 

In tll8 meanu.ae, pl.ease accep~ rq t.bmlrs tor 70v.r ftlT 

COUl"teot.111 1nn\at.1on. to 11bieb I hope to be able to seal a 

aooept.ance Vflr'J som. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
# C_2015286EN.01000201.xml

| 29.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 August 2015

(2015/C 286/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1268 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4630 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73210 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4953 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0807 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3400 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,048 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2405 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4313 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2921 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5789 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4954 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7327 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7477 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5844 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 327,20 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9146 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1998 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5610 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 794,75 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7165 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,631 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,5398 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,439 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0171 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,0764 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,5519 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1268

JPY

Japanese yen

136,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4630

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73210

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4953

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0807

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3400

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,048

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2405

RON

Romanian leu

4,4313

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2921

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5789

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4954

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7327

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7477

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5844

KRW

South Korean won

1 327,20

ZAR

South African rand

14,9146

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1998

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5610

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 794,75

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7165

PHP

Philippine peso

52,631

RUB

Russian rouble

75,5398

THB

Thai baht

40,439

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0171

MXN

Mexican peso

19,0764

INR

Indian rupee

74,5519

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
May 16 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CLIFFORD STARKS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 12

- 01001

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of appeal. Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2016235EN.01000302.xml

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8064 — Bain Capital/Vista/Vertafore)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/03)

On 20 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8064. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8064. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Order entered December 1, 2016 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01249-CV 

IN RE GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY AND CELIA STEFL, Relators 

Original Proceeding from the 193rd Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2-DC-16-06754 

ORDER 

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we CONDITIONALLY GRANT the petition 

for writ of mandamus, and DIRECT the trial court to render an order vacating the court’s 

August 22, 2016 order for separate trials, vacating the court’s September 23, 2016 order denying 

motion to reconsider, granting relators’ motion to sever and abate, severing Thorpe’s 

extracontractual and unfair settlement claims from the UIM liability claims, and abating the 

severed claims. 

We ORDER the trial court to file with this Court, within fifteen (15) days of the date of 

this order, a certified copy of its order issued in compliance with this order. Should the trial 

court fail to comply with this order, the writ will issue. 
The stay granted by this Court on November 29, 2016 will remain in effect until the trial 

court complies with the Court’s opinion of this date and this order. 

/s/ MOLLY FRANCIS 

 JUSTICE
# C_2016186EN.01000201.xml

| 25.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 May 2016

(2016/C 186/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1168 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,56 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4365 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,76513 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3060 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1079 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3355 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,025 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 316,00 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4358 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5083 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3035 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5597 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4684 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6743 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6604 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5445 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 329,32 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,4501 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3226 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4950 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 278,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5959 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,267 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,4262 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,914 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9639 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5852 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,5780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1168

JPY

Japanese yen

122,56

DKK

Danish krone

7,4365

GBP

Pound sterling

0,76513

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3060

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1079

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3355

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,025

HUF

Hungarian forint

316,00

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4358

RON

Romanian leu

4,5083

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3035

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5597

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4684

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6743

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6604

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5445

KRW

South Korean won

1 329,32

ZAR

South African rand

17,4501

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3226

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4950

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 278,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5959

PHP

Philippine peso

52,267

RUB

Russian rouble

74,4262

THB

Thai baht

39,914

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9639

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5852

INR

Indian rupee

75,5780

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# PCA Perspectives on Key Portland Cement NESHAP Issues

May 2012

# Overview  Modification to particulate matter (PM) emission limit to address rulemaking petition  Technology implications for PM and other pollutants associated with new PM limit  Compliance deadline extension necessary to address technology implications  Universe of impacted cement facilities

1

# Modification to PM Emission Limit  Rulemaking petition addressing PM limit forwarded to EPA by Holcim in November 2011  New PM data from continuous measuring devices provided to EPA  Data indicate a significant variability in PM emissions over an extended period  When variability is appropriately considered in PM limit calculation, emission limit is higher. (0.04 to 0.07 lbs/ton of clinker)

2

# PM Technology Implications  Facilities equipped with electrostatic precipitators may be able to modify, rather than replace existing units  Facilities equipped with baghouses will confront alternative design options, likely resulting in new designs for existing units and the possibility of avoiding, in some instances, the installation of a new unit  Exhaust fan size and design will be reconsidered as it must be coordinated with the size and design of the PM control device 3

# Technology Implications for Other Pollutants  Controls to limit HCl , mercury and total hydrocarbon emissions impact PM emissions; all sorbent technologies, such as lime and carbon injection, increase particulate loading  Differential impacts need to be factored into the design and operation of both PM and other pollutant controls  Controls for the four pollutants must work in tandem to ensure continuous compliance 4

# Time Needed to Prepare for Compliance

1
-4/13 4
-8/13 8
- 12/13 1
- 6/14 6
- 12/14 1
-3/15 4
- 8/15 New Engineering Study

Selection of

Technology

Providers Technology Procurement Process

Detailed Technology Design and Final Engineering Equipment Fabrication and Permitting

Construction and Tying into Existing Operation 5 Technology Commissioning

# Impacted Cement Facilities  PCA conducted a survey to determine technology implications of modified PM limit  18 of 23 PCA members companies provided responses  Information collected from 92 of approximately 150 U.S. cement kilns

 21 kilns have electrostatic precipitators  70 kilns have baghouses  1 kiln has both  63% of kilns equipped with electrostatic precipitators will reconsider technology selections and compliance approach  43% of kilns equipped with baghouses will do the same  44% of kilns will reevaluate technology selections for other pollutants 6

# Thank You!
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 07-1475, 07-1477

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant,

v.

NADINE J. GRIFFIN,

Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellee.

ERRATA SHEET

The opinion of this Court issued on April 18, 2008 is

amended as follows:

Page 11, line 23: Please replace, "indifference" with

"ignorance."
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0001139

30-NOV-2016

09:14 AM
# C_2016089EN.01000101.xml

| 5.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7898 — Arauco/Sonae Indústria/Tafisa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 89/01)

On 26 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7898. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7898. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT
      (32)


**Section
      1350 Certifications of**


**Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer**





The
      undersigned, Barry W. Perry, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Engelhard
      Corporation (the “Company”), and Michael A. Sperduto, Vice President and Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that the Quarterly
      Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005
      (the
“Report”) (1) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (2) the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the
      results of operations of the Company.





Date:
            November
                8, 2005
            
            /s/
                Barry W. PerryBarry
                W. PerryChairman
                and ChiefExecutive
                OfficerDate:
            November
                8, 2005
            
            /s/
                Michael A. SperdutoMichael
                A. SperdutoVice
                President and ChiefFinancial
                Officer





This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
      purposes of Section 18 or any other provision of the Securities Exchange Act
      of
      1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
      Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
      upon request.




40
~D S7q~

•

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

October 17, 2014

Dennehotso Chapter, Navajo Nation Reservation

P.O. Box 2301

Dennehotso, AZ 86535

ATTN: ADMIN OFFICE

Subject: Public documents at the Dennehotso Chapter for public inspection

Dear Sir or Madam:

The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency sent you a package containing a number of documents

regarding the McElmo Creek Unit Oil Production Facility on the Navajo Nation Indian Reservation

near the city of Aneth, San Juan County, Utah. Two of these documents contained an error, and need

to be replaced. Please replace the following documents in the package previously sent to you with

the enclosed documents:

1. PUBLIC INFORMATION SHEET

2. AMBIENT AIR QUALITY IMPACT REPORT & FACT SHEET

Your assistance with this matter is greatly appreciated. Feel free to contact me at (415) 947-4156 or

kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov if you have any questions.

Air Division

Shaheerah Environmental Engineer

Permits Office

Enclosures