alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016275EN.01000102.xml

| 28.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 275/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 275/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8086 — Sumitomo/WW Grainger/PT Sumisho E-Commerce Indonesia JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 275/02)

On 18 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8086. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8086. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Forsyth Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy  D. Foreman, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to
Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Company's  Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December
     31,  2004  (the "Periodic Report"), to which this Certification is attached
     as  Exhibit  32.2, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
     15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

/s/  Timothy D. Foreman
-----------------------

Timothy D. Foreman
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer and Treasurer
March 30, 2005
EXHIBIT 15.3




June 21, 2010





Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, DC 20549





Commissioners:




We were previously principal accountants for Top Image Systems (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. and its subsidiaries and, under the date of April 21, 2009, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of Top Image Systems (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. as of and for the year ended December 31, 2008 and as of and for the six month period ended December 31, 2007. On April 21, 2009, we declined to stand for reelection. We have read Top Image System Ltd’s statements included under Item 16F of its Form 20-F dated June 21, 2010, and we agree with such statements, except that we are not in a position to agree or disagree with Top Image Systems Ltd’s statement that Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer (a member of Ernst and Young Global) was not engaged regarding the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on Top Image Systems (Asia Pacific ) Pte. Ltd.’s consolidated financial statements.




Very truly yours,





(signed) KPMG LLP


Singapore
#### Van Steenwyck, Bank Comptroller, vs. Charles Miller and others. Same vs. M. D. Miller and others. Same vs. Same. Same vs. Same.

Where a party neglected to appeal from an order vacating a judgment in his favor, but nearly a year after it was made moved to set it aside and revive the judgment, and appealed from an order denying that motion : *JTM,*that the appeal could not be sustained without a palpable evasion of the statute limiting the time for appeals from orders.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Bane*County.

These appeals were taken from orders of said court refusing to set aside previous orders vacating j udgments in favor of the plaintiffs in the several actions. The question presented will sufficiently appear from the opinion of this court.

*Winfield Smith,*Attorney General, for the appellant.

*J. H. Carpenter,*for respondents.

*By the Court,*

DixoN, C. J.

The sustaining of these appeals would be such a palpable evasion of the statute prescribing the time within which appeals from orders must be taken, that we are almost surprised that they should have been brought to this court. The orders vacating the judgments- in the court below were made on the 10th day of June, 1862. The plaintiff acquiesced until the 13th day of May, 1863, when he procured an order in each case requiring the defendants to show cause why the former orders should not be set aside and the judgments revived. The orders to show cause were discharged, with costs, and the relief denied on the 25th day of May, 1863. The plaintiff appeals, and seeks to re-open the controversy upon the merits of the original orders, and to have the judgments re-instated. It is clear that this cannot be done. If it could be done after the lapse of one year, then it could be done at any time, and controversies would never be at rest. *321The intention of the statute is to secure dispatch in the review of all orders from which an appeal is given, and we know of no way but to adhere strictly to it.

The appeals must be dismissed, with costs.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIO:tt:)EC

# E \ 

# v ED FEDERAL AVIATIONADMINISTRATIONn · OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## NOV 1**~** 

## 2013

WASHINGTON, D.C.
. 

## I:":T 

## HeARING**QOCK~;;**

In the Matter ofNortheastem Aviation Corp., Respondent DocketNos. FAA"2012-1264

Case Nos. 2012EA110030 Administrative Law Judge I.E. Sullivan AGENCY'S SUPPLEMENT TO SUBMISSIONS UNDERFEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(a)(l)(A)
COMES NOW the Agency, by counsel, and supplements its initial disclosures pursuant to F.R.C.P. 26(a)(1)(A), as per the Order Setting**~itigation** Dates and Procedures dated June 4, 2013, to add the following: DISCLOSURE UNDERF.R.C.P. 26(a)(l)(A)(i) In addition to those already listed, the following individual is_likely to have discoverable information that the Agency may use to support its claims: Aviation Safety Inspector (ASD John Wilkins, Farmingdale Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), 7150 Republic Airport, Administration Building, Suite 235, Farmingdale, NY 11735. Subject matter: The check ride that Michael Kalishconductedwith ASI Wilkins on August 22, 20ll. Respectfully submitted, Alfred R. Johnson, Jr. Regional Counsel



### By:.

# ~~**Zachary~**erman Attorney Federal AviationAdministration I Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY ll434 TEL:718**553~3258** FAX: 718 995-5699 Date: November 5, 2013

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certifY thatthe foregoing AGENCY'S SUPPLEMEN TO SUBMISSIONS UNDERFEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(a)(l)(A) has been sent via frrst class mail and facsimile to the following: Mr. James Ehrig, Esq. Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, LLC 1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20006- FAX 202-659-6699 Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTranspmiation !200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-3!0) Washington, DC 20590 FAX: (202)366-7536 I hereby certifY thatthe foregoing AGENCY'S SUPPLEMEN TO SUBMISSIONS UNDERFEDERALRULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26(a)(l)(A) has been sent via first class mail to the following:
. Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy via first class mail) 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 2059! Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building- Room 2014

Date:

-------

I Paralegal Specialist Federal Aviation Administration Office ofRegional Counsel I Aviation Plaza Jamaica, NY 1!434

3
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50351

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SERGIO IVAN ORTIZ FRIAS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-1771-1

Before KING, DENNIS, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Sergio Ivan Ortiz Frias has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Ortiz Frias has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s 

brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 28, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50351 Document: 00513774922 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/28/2016
No. 16-50351

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50351 Document: 00513774922 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/28/2016
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50838

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE GUADALUPE PEREZ-CHAVEZ, also known as Jose Perez-Chavez,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:15-CR-276-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Guadalupe 

Perez-Chavez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez-Chavez has not filed a response. 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 29, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50838 Document: 00513776046 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
No. 15-50838

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 15-50838 Document: 00513776046 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
# C_2016006EN.01000101.xml

| 9.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7882 — Thomas H Lee Partners/Goldman Sachs/GCA Service Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 6/01)

On 5 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7882. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7882. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1

The following certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or
otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and
irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Advanced Analogic Technologies
Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his respective knowledge:

(1) the accompanying report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the first quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated for the periods presented therein.

Date: October 5, 2009



/s/    RICHARD K.
WILLIAMSRichard K. WilliamsChief Executive Officer


Date: October 5, 2009



/s/    BRIAN R.
MCDONALDBrian R. McDonaldChief Financial Officer


A signed original of the above certification has been provided to Advanced
Analogic Technologies Incorporated and will be retained by Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
-79.5 -79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

 40.0

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.86 N 77.06 W Meters AGL
# C_2016151EN.01001201.xml

| 28.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/12 |
| --------- | -- | -------------------------------------- | -------- |

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2016/C 151/08)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competition:

| | EPSO/AST/137/16 — Linguistic Assistants (AST 1) for the following languages:
Danish (DA) Irish (GA) Croatian (HR) Hungarian (HU) Maltese (MT) Dutch (NL) Slovak (SK) Slovenian (SL) | | Danish (DA) | | Irish (GA) | | Croatian (HR) | | Hungarian (HU) | | Maltese (MT) | | Dutch (NL) | | Slovak (SK) | | Slovenian (SL) |
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | ----------- | | ---------- | | ------------- | | -------------- | | ------------ | | ---------- | | ----------- | | -------------- |
| | Danish (DA) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Irish (GA) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Croatian (HR) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Hungarian (HU) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Maltese (MT) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Dutch (NL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Slovak (SK) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Slovenian (SL) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal of the European Union C 151 A of 28 April 2016.

Further information can be found on the EPSO website:

http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

DONALD BROWN, JR., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting 

Commissioner, Social Security 

Administration 

 

Defendant. 

 

 

Civil Action No. 14-cv-1826 (CRC) (DAR) 

ORDER 

Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 

Recommendation filed September 29, 2016, and hearing no objections from the Defendant, the 

Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and ACCEPTS the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. 

Accordingly, it is hereby 

ORDERED that [9] Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment of Reversal be GRANTED. It is 

further 

ORDERED that [10] Defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Affirmance be DENIED. It is 

further 

ORDERED that the case be remanded to the Social Security Administration for further 

proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation. 

SO ORDERED.

Date: November 30, 2016 

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER 

United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

STATE OF MARYLAND,

FRIENDS OF THE CAPITAL CRESCENT )
TRAIL, et al. )
)
Plaintiffs, )
)
v. ) Civil Case No. 14-01471 (RJL)
)
FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION, __ )
etal. )
) FILED
Federal Defendants. )
} Nov 2.2 2016
v. ) Clork, U.S. District & Bankr
) Courts for the District of cohmbea
)
)
)

Defendant-Intervenor.

(November 222016) [Dkts. ## 98, 99]

For the reasons set forth in the Memorandum Opinion accompanying this Order,

re
ORDER ~

federal defendants’ Motion to Alter or to Amend the Court’s Judgment [Dkt. # 99] and
defendant-intervenor Maryland’s Motion to Alter or to Amend the Court’s Judgment
[Dkt. # 98] are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. It is hereby ORDERED
1. That the Federal Transit Administration (“FTA”) shall conduct an assessment as
expeditiously as possible, in accordance with its regulations, as to whether recent
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”) Metrorail safety

and ridership issues require a supplemental EIS (“SEIS”) for the Purple Line. Upon


completion, the FTA shall submit the assessment to the Court with a determination

as to whether the WMATA Metrorail safety and ridership issues require an SEIS.

. Ifthe FTA determines that an SEIS is required, the FTA shall file a notice with the

Court announcing that an SEIS will be prepared, and shall provide an estimate of

how long it will take to complete the SEIS.

If the FTA determines that an SEIS is not required, the following supplemental

briefing schedule shall be established:

a.

Together with the filing of the assessment and determination, or within seven
days thereafter, federal defendants and defendant-intervenor will file renewed
motions for summary judgment on the limited issue of whether the WMATA
Metrorail safety and ridership issues require an SEIS for the Purple Line.
Federal defendants’ and defendant-intervenor’s supporting memoranda shall
not exceed 15 pages each;

Fourteen days after federal defendants and defendant-intervenor file their
renewed motions, plaintiffs shall file their opposition. Plaintiffs’ supporting
memorandum shall not exceed 20 pages; and

Seven days after plaintiffs file their opposition, federal defendants and
defendant-intervenor shall file their replies. Federal defendants’ and

defendant-intervenor’s supporting memoranda shall not exceed 10 pages each.

SO ORDERED. '
l C edu luct|

RICHARD J. LEON
United States District Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001104280
<NAME>     SANGUI BIOTECH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         7670265
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    88753
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      74486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               8006499
<PP&E>                                          917063
<DEPRECIATION>                                  548249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8416475
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           199249
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      18530881
<OTHER-SE>                                  (10313655)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8416475
<SALES>                                         122789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                122789
<CGS>                                            90617
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    90617
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                651678
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (548773)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (548773)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (548773)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>