alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors and Members
ASTROLINK International LLC:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
333-18167, 333-35454 and 333-48770) on Form S-8 of Liberty Satellite &
Technology, Inc. of our report relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
ASTROLINK International LLC and subsidiaries (a development stage limited
liability company) as of December 31, 2000 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, members' equity and cash flows for the
period from January 1, 1999 through April 21, 1999 (Predecessor period), the
period from April 22, 1999 (date of inception) through December 31, 1999, each
of the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, and for the period from April 22,
1999 (date of inception) through December 31, 2001, which report appears in the
December 31, 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Liberty Satellite & Technology,
Inc.

Our report, dated March 29, 2002, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has not generated any revenue and is dependent upon additional
equity and/or debt financing to complete construction and launch of its intended
satellite system, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue
as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.



                                        KPMG LLP

McLean, Virginia
April 2, 2002
From: "Susan Thorsell" <SThorsell@astburyenviro.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 11/01/2010 01:03 PM

Subject: Superior Aluminum Alloys Report

Ms Boyd,

Please find attached a scanned copy of the Superior Aluminum Alloys Report. If you have difficulty reading this

copy I will be happy to send you a hard copy.

Thank you,



# Susan

Susan Thorsell

Project Manager

Air Analysis Division

Astbury Environmental Engineering

5757 West 74th Street

Indianapol is, Indiana 46278

317.472.0999 office

877.683.8378 toll free

317.472.0993 fax
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 23, 2016

Order 

Clerk

November 23, 2016

153979(54)

MARLETTE AUTO WASH, LLC, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant- Appellant, SC: 153979

v COA: 326486

Sanilac CC: 14-035490-CH

VAN DYKE SC PROPERTIES, LLC, Defendant/Counterplaintiff- Appellee. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Real Property Law Section of the 

State Bar of Michigan to participate as amicus curiae and to file an amicus brief is 

GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on November 15, 2016, is accepted for filing.
# C_2016028EN.01000301.xml

| 26.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 28/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Luxembourg

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 50th anniversary of the bridge ‘Grand Duchess Charlotte’

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows the bridge ‘Grand Duchess Charlotte’ which is the main route connecting the city centre of Luxembourg to the urban quarter of Kirchberg, the site of the city’s European Union institutions. The text ‘Pont Grande-Duchesse Charlotte’ (Bridge Grand Duchess Charlotte) and underneath the year ‘1966’ are inscribed on the image of the bridge. At the top of the design are depicted the effigy of the Grand Duke Henri of Luxembourg and at its left the year of issuance ‘2016’. At the bottom appears the name of the issuing country ‘LUXEMBOURG’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : February/March 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2015171EN.01000101.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 171/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 155, 11.5.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 146, 4.5.2015

OJ C 138, 27.4.2015

OJ C 127, 20.4.2015

OJ C 118, 13.4.2015

OJ C 107, 30.3.2015

OJ C 96, 23.3.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6482** 

EDWARD LEE DAVIS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director; W. PIXLEY, Warden, St. Brides Correctional Center , Respondents

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne , Senior District Judge. ( 3:13

- cv - 00119

- REP )

Submitted : June 26 , 2014 Decided: June 30, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Edward Lee Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Bidwell Theisen, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Edward Lee Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this sta ndard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When t he district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 8 5. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Davis has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argumen t because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

VIRGIL RIVERA,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 542 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00247-CV

Michael Bailey

v.

Kristy Anne Bobay

§

§

§

§

From the 324th District Court

of Tarrant County (324-574214-15)

December 1, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Michael Bailey shall pay all of the costs 

of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By __/s/ Bonnie Sudderth_______________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
# C_2016311EN.01000101.xml

| 26.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8122 — SEGRO/PSPIB/SELP/Pusignan-DC1)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 311/01)

On 19 August 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8122. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8122. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
 
                     INFORMATION MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, INC.


                              LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES


     The subsidiaries of the Registrant are as follows:

<TABLE> 
<S>                                                    <C> 
Information Management Resources (India) Limited       Organized in India             
Information Management Resources (U.K.) Limited        Organized in the United Kingdom
The Link Group Holdings Limited                        Organized in the United Kingdom
Information Management Resources UK                                                   
  Holding Company Limited                              Organized in the United Kingdom
Movietone, Ltd.                                        Organized in India             
Information Management Resources IOR, Ltd.             Organized in Mauritius         
Information Management Resources Canada Ltd.           Organized in Canada             
</TABLE> 

     Each company does business in the name listed above.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Administration For Children And Families

          - [CFDA Number 93.576]

# AGENCY:

Office of Refugee Resettlement, ACF, HHS.

# ACTION:

Announcement of the award of an emergency single-source grant to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants in Arlington, VA.

# SUMMARY:

The Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) announces the award of an emergency single-source grant in the amount of $804,075 to the U.S. Committee for Refugees and Immigrants (USCRI) in Arlington, VA, to support resettlement services to Iranian refugee parolees.

# DATES:

Funds will support activities from December 15, 2014 through December 14, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kenneth Tota, Acting Director, Office of Refugee Resettlement, 901 D Street SW., Washington, DC 20047. Telephone: 202-401-4858. Email:                         *kenneth.tota@acf.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Award funds will provide resettlement services to approximately 100 Iranian individuals currently residing in a refugee camp in Iraq. USCRI will provide services to this refugee parolee population including, but not limited to: Initial reception, housing, employment, enhanced case management, staffing, interpreter services, and counseling. This emergency grant will support the provision of these much needed services to ensure these parolees are afforded a successful path to self-sufficiency.

Statutory Authority: Section 412(c)(1)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1522(c)(1)(A)).

Christopher Beach, 

Senior Grants Policy Specialist, Office of Administration.

[FR Doc. 2015-06311 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4184-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16426-16427]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06971]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Drug Enforcement Administration

[Docket No. DEA-392]


Importer of Controlled Substances Application: Meda 
Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

ACTION: Notice of application.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class, and 
applicants therefore, may file written comments on or objections to the 
issuance of the proposed registration in accordance with 21 CFR 
1301.34(a) on or before April 27, 2015. Such persons may also file a 
written request for a hearing on the application pursuant to 21 CFR 
1301.43 on or before April 27, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement 
Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/ODXL, 
8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. Request for 
hearings should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: 
Hearing Clerk/LJ, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Attorney General has delegated his 
authority under the Controlled Substances Act to the Administrator of 
the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), 28 CFR 0.100(b). Authority 
to exercise all necessary functions with respect to the promulgation 
and implementation of 21 CFR part 1301, incident to the registration of 
manufacturers, distributors, dispensers, importers, and exporters of 
controlled substances (other than final orders in connection with 
suspension, denial, or revocation of registration) has been redelegated 
to the Deputy Assistant Administrator of the DEA Office of Diversion 
Control (``Deputy Assistant Administrator'') pursuant to section 7 of 
28 CFR part 0, appendix of subpart R.
    In accordance with 21 CFR 1301.34(a), this is notice that on 
December 5, 2014, Meda

[[Page 16427]]

Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 705 Eldorado Street, Decatur, Illinois 62523 
applied to be registered as an importer Nabilone (7379), a basic class 
of controlled substance listed in schedule II.
    The company plans to import the FDA approved drug product in 
finished dosage form for distribution to its customers.

    Dated: March 20, 2015.
Joseph T. Rannazzisi,
Deputy Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-06971 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4410-09-P
# C_2015233EN.01000201.xml

| 17.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 233/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 233/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7665 — Castleton/Morgan Stanley Global Oil Merchanting Unit)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 233/03)

On 3 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7665. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7665. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
99-914.

#### State v. Childress.

Cuyahoga App. No. 71956. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

March 8, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00295

- CR

Brian Dale NIXON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 454th Judicial District Court

, Medina County, Texas

Trial Court No. 16

- 04

- 11 937

- CR Honorable Sid L. Harle , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellee’s brief was originally due to be filed on March 7, 2022. On March 1, 2022, appellee filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief until April 18, 2022

— an extension of forty

- two days. Appellee’s motion is GRANTED.

Appellee is ORDERED to file its brief no later than April 18, 2022

. Appellee is advised that counsel’s heavy case load or demanding work schedule is not an extraordinary circumstance warranting further requests for an extension of time.

_ ________________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunt o set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 8th day of March, 2022

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# C_2016136EN.01000101.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2016/C 136/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 118, 4.4.2016

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 111, 29.3.2016

OJ C 106, 21.3.2016

OJ C 98, 14.3.2016

OJ C 90, 7.3.2016

OJ C 78, 29.2.2016

OJ C 68, 22.2.2016

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 1, 2016

No. 04-16-00192-CV

Abelardo G. GONZALEZ,

Appellant

v.

Nicholas LICHTENBERGER; Judge Jose Antonio Lopez; City of Laredo; Roque Perez; 

Christina M. Pena; Webb County; Martin Cuellar; Pepe Salinas; Sergio Lozano; 

and Edward A. Nolen,

Appellees

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003714 D1

Honorable Robert C. Chesire, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The panel has considered the appellant's motion to reconsider the denial of oral argument, 

and the motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on December 1, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Attested to: _______________________________

 Keith E. Hottle

 Clerk of Court
# C_2015375EN.01000102.xml

| 12.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 375/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 375/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7585 — NXP Semiconductors/Freescale Semiconductor)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 375/02)

On 17 September 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7585. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7585. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---