alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This Schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from the audited
condensed   consolidated   financial   statements  which  are  included  in  the
registrant's  Form 10-Q for the period  ended  6/30/00 and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001104219
<NAME>                        SeraNova, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         920
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,138
<ALLOWANCES>                                   1,086
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               25,319
<PP&E>                                         9,457
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2,049
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 36,874
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12,173
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       175
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   36,874
<SALES>                                        36,019
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               36,019
<CGS>                                          18,435
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  42,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (6,821)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             165
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,095)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,891)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,891)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.29)


</TABLE>
117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2771 

AN ACT 

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the 

Department of Veterans Affairs in San Angelo, Texas, 

as the ‘‘Colonel Charles and JoAnne Powell Department 

of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2771 ES

1 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

2 Congress finds the following: 

3 (1) Colonel Charles Powell and his wife, Mrs. 

4 JoAnne Powell, served the community of San An5 gelo, Texas, with character and dignity. 

6 (2) Colonel Powell served as the base com7 mander of Goodfellow Air Force Base from 1980 to 

8 1984. 

9 (3) When the Powells moved to San Angelo, 

10 Charles was ordered to help Goodfellow avoid closure 

11 and the displacement of many members of the 

12 Armed Forces from the community they had grown 

13 to love. 

14 (4) The impact of Charles’ career can still be 

15 felt today at Goodfellow Air Force Base, as it serves 

16 as a training school for thousands of members from 

17 every Armed Force to train in cryptology, intel18 ligence, and firefighting. 

19 (5) JoAnne assisted thousands of constituents 

20 in the district offices of Representatives Tom Loef21 fler, Lamar Smith, K. Michael Conaway, and Au22 gust Pfluger. 

23 (6) One of the several duties JoAnne spear24 headed was the annual process of nominations to the 

25 military service academies, which was always a year26 round process for her. 
3 

†S 2771 ES

1 (7) With JoAnne’s assistance, many of the 

2 young men and women of the 11th congressional 

3 district of Texas went on to serve the United States 

4 and attend one of the military service academies. 

5 (8) In addition, JoAnne was a fierce advocate 

6 of veterans and helped thousands of individuals gain 

7 access to the veterans benefits they rightfully 

8 earned. 

9 (9) JoAnne’s compassion and dedication helped 

10 make the Concho Valley a better place. 

11 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF COMMUNITY-BASED OUTPATIENT 

12 CLINIC OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AF13 FAIRS IN SAN ANGELO, TEXAS. 

14 (a) DESIGNATION.—The community-based outpatient 

15 clinic of the Department of Veterans Affairs in San An16 gelo, Texas, shall after the date of the enactment of this 

17 Act be known and designated as the ‘‘Colonel Charles and 

18 JoAnne Powell Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic’’ or 

19 the ‘‘Colonel Charles and JoAnne Powell VA Clinic’’. 

20 (b) REFERENCE.—Any reference in any law, regula21 tion, map, document, paper, or other record of the United 

22 States to the community-based outpatient clinic referred 

23 to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference 
4 

†S 2771 ES

1 to the Colonel Charles and JoAnne Powell Department of 

2 Veterans Affairs Clinic. 

Passed the Senate March 3, 2022. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 2771 

AN ACT 

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic 

Clinic’’. Anne Powell Department of Veterans Affairs Angelo, Texas, as the ‘‘Colonel Charles and Joof the Department of Veterans Affairs in San
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00551

- CV

T. S. A. , Appellant

v.
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services , Appellee

FROM THE 421ST DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY NO. 20

- FL

- 289

- A , THE HONORABLE THOMAS NATH ANIEL STUCKEY , JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM
Appellant T. S. A. filed her notice of appeal on October 26, 2021 . The appellate

record was complete on November 15, 2021 , making appellant’s brief due on December 6, 2021

.
On December 3, 2021 , coun s el for appellant filed a motion for extension of time to file

appellant’s brief.
The rules of judicial administration accelerate the final disposition of appeals

from suits for t ermination of parental rights. See Tex. R. Jud. Admin. 6.2(a) (providing 180 days

for court’s final disposition). The accelerated schedule constrains this Court’s leeway in granting

extensions. In this instance, we will grant the motion and order James B. Peplinski to file

appellant’s brief no later than December 26, 2021 . If t h e brief is not filed by that date, counsel

may be required to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court.2 It is ordered on December 1 4, 2021.

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
# C_2016034EN.01000102.xml

| 29.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 34/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 34/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7879 — Saudi Aramco/Lanxess/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 34/02)

On 8 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7879. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7879. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016281EN.01001701.xml

| 3.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 281/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 281/17

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 281/10)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Malta

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Ġgantija Temples

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The coin depicts the Ġgantija Temples situated on the Island of Gozo. Ġgantija is a megalithic temple complex dating to the Neolithic ages. It is one of the world's oldest free-standing structures, as well as one of the oldest religious structures. Built approximately in the 36th century BC, Ġgantija pre-dates Stonehenge and the Egyptian Pyramids. At the top right the inscription ‘ĠGANTIJA TEMPLES’ and underneath the years ‘3800-3200 BC’. At the bottom left the name of the country of issuance ‘MALTA’ and underneath the year of issuance ‘2016’, flanked by the mint master mark and the mint mark.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : July-August 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
EXHIBIT 10.17



February 16, 2005



Mr. Ray C. Dillon

103 Challain

Little Rock, AR 72223



Dear Ray:



Pursuant to a decision by the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board
of Directors of Deltic Timber Corporation, attached is the basis of remuneration and other items should our company experience a Change-in-Control* or should you be terminated without cause.



I am pleased the Committee agreed to extend these potential benefits to you.



Sincerely,R. Madison MurphyChairman, Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Deltic Timber Corporation




---

|* | Change-in-control shall have the same meaning as set forth in the Deltic Timber Corporation 2002 Stock Incentive Plan.
|- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

A Change-in Control (CIC) Agreement with a double trigger where in the event a change in control occurs
and the President and CEO is dismissed within two years without cause or suffer (i) a reduction in salary and potential bonus and/or (ii) a meaningful diminution in job responsibility as a consequence of such a change, he would receive the
following:



| | a) | Two years base salary and target bonus
| | -- | --------------------------------------



| | b) | Two years of health and welfare benefits
| | -- | ----------------------------------------



| | c) | Accelerated vesting of all stock options and restricted stock
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------



| | d) | Comprehensive executive outplacement services
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------



| | e) | Should any of these actions attract excise tax, they would be grossed up
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | f) | Any cash payments will be paid in one payment as soon as practicable following the event
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



An Involuntary Severance Agreement for the President and CEO where in the event of an involuntary termination of the President and CEO
occurs without cause, he would receive the following:



| | a) | Two years base salary and target bonus
| | -- | --------------------------------------



| | b) | Two years of health and welfare benefits
| | -- | ----------------------------------------



| | c) | Accelerated vesting of all stock options and restricted stock
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------



| | d) | Comprehensive executive outplacement services
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------



| | e) | Should any of these actions attract excise tax, they would be grossed up
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | f) | Any cash payments will be paid in one payment as soon as practicable following the event
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VITECH
AMERICA, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                           12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                       DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               1,024,420
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       58,772,833
<ALLOWANCES>                                         4,057,077
<INVENTORY>                                         28,678,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    93,955,121
<PP&E>                                              24,113,528
<DEPRECIATION>                                       3,164,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     148,438,177
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               48,021,435
<BONDS>                                             46,691,710
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            72,385,718
<OTHER-SE>                                        (18,660,686)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       148,438,177
<SALES>                                            100,423,084
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   100,423,084
<CGS>                                               59,655,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       88,152,548
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17,127,358
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (21,147,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (44,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (21,103,093)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (21,103,093)
<EPS-BASIC>                                             (1.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (1.42)


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6373

HAROLD WATTS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. WARDEN, BROAD RIVER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Charleston

. Br uce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 2:16

- cv - 02954

- BHH )

Submitted : August 28, 2018 Decided: October 5, 2018

Before MOTZ, AGEE, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Harold Watts, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Harold Watts seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendatio n of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability w ill not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would
fi nd that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conc lude that Watts has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this c ourt and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2780 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2780

  To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit certain adverse 
 personnel actions taken against members of the Armed Forces based on 
                    declining the COVID-19 vaccine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 21, 2021

Mr. Marshall (for himself, Mr. Tuberville, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Cruz) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title 10, United States Code, to prohibit certain adverse 
 personnel actions taken against members of the Armed Forces based on 
                    declining the COVID-19 vaccine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``COVID-19 Vaccine Dishonorable 
Discharge Prevention Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ADVERSE PERSONNEL ACTIONS TAKEN AGAINST MEMBERS 
              OF THE ARMED FORCES BASED ON DECLINING COVID-19 VACCINE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds the following:
            (1) The Secretary of Defense has announced a COVID-19 
        vaccine mandate will take effect for the Department of Defense.
            (2) Reports of adverse actions being taken, or threatened, 
        by military leadership at all levels are antithetical to our 
        fundamental American values.
            (3) Any discharge other than honorable denotes a 
        dereliction of duty or a failure to serve the United States and 
        its people to the best of the ability of an individual.
    (b) Prohibition.--Chapter 55 of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended by inserting after section 1107a the following new section:
``Sec. 1107b. Prohibition on certain adverse personnel actions related 
              to COVID-19 vaccine requirement
    ``Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a member of the armed 
forces subject to discharge on the basis of the member choosing not to 
receive the COVID-19 vaccine may only receive an honorable 
discharge.''.
    (c) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
1107a the following new item:

``1107b. Prohibition on certain adverse personnel actions related to 
                            COVID-19 vaccine requirement.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

November 22, 2016

No. 16-1217

Rafael Ignacio Guerrero,

a/k/a Rafael Ignacio Guerro-Sanchez,

 Petitioner

v.

Attorney General of the United States

(Agency No. A076-736-498 )

Present: SHWARTZ, COWEN and FUENTES, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Respondent to Amend the Opinion Dated 10/19/16.

Respectfully,

Clerk/tyw

_________________________________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing Motion by Respondent to amend the Opinion dated 10/19/16 is granted. 

An amended opinion will be filed.

By the Court,

s/Patty Shwartz

Circuit Judge

Dated: November 30, 2016

tyw/cc: Rafael Ignacio Guerrero-Sanchez

Aric A. Anderson, Esq.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

NICHOLAS TODD HELMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 600 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
Exhibit 99.7

News Release
February 11, 2000

Trading Symbols:TRBD (EASDAQ)

VIA ECR (EASDAQ COMPANY REPORTING)

TURBODYNE DISCLOSES MAJOR SHAREHOLDER

Carpinteria, CAFebruary 11, 2000Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD)
disclosed today through dissemination via ECR that Mr. Edward Halimi filed a Schedule 13 G filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission on February 16, 1999,
reporting that he is the beneficial owner of 3,450,000 shares of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc., holding the sole voting power and the sole dispositive power. The number of shares was
reported as amounting to 8.35% of the outstanding shares when filed.

Turbodyne
Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company, specializes in the development of performance enhancement, fuel economy and pollution control products for
internal combustion engines. Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Contacts:

Corporate
Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group FinanceInvestor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Business Development, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665

---

QuickLinks
Exhibit A
Exhibit B