Hello,

I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent required for Jack Steiger to 

be able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System even though he exceeds the weight limits for the 

CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, I request that any air carrier or commercial operator operating 

under part 121 while Jack is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 

121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow Jack to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAAapproved child restraint system during use of that child restraint system aboard an aircraft.

I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 Seats, 

safety belts, and shoulder harnesses.

My Jack is 7 year’s old, weighs 54 pounds, and is ______ inches tall. My son’s physical condition is as 

follows cortical dysplasia and completed stroke. As a result of his physical condition, he needs the 

support and security provided by an FAA Approved Child Restraint, but because of his weight is 

incapable of compliance with the regulation. I am also submitting the following contact

information: Todd and Heather Steiger, 5144 Oak Brook Drive, Cinti. OH 45244 and (email address

of parent or guardian, hafdef100@gmail.com)

I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger by 

ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also 

ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane by being thrown into 

them during turbulent or emergency conditions.

I propose that Jack Steigerbe allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, 

manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a 

high level of safety for Jack and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. 

In fact, in Jack’s case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA 

Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire flight.

Enhancing safety for Jack is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact

that the use of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System allows Jack to use commercial air 

transportation. Without the support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restraint System, he would 

be unable to fly commercially.

I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be 

an equivalent level of safety to that provided by the affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been 

certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES 

restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their integrity if 

used by someone who weighed several hundred pounds.
I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the child 

attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scenario and this 

might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES 

restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would mean that it would not be there to 

attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose that 

the FAA establish a limitation in a grant to this petition that Jack only sits in a passenger seat with no 

passenger seated behind her. Therefore, no unsafe condition would exist for a passenger seated behind 

Jack while he is using the CARES restraint. I also propose that all operations under this exemption be 

conducted with at least one of Jack’s parents or a caregiver accompanying him or her. In addition, I 

propose that Jack’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption.

I also request that the processing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in the 

Federal Register. We want to travel to the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota from Cincinnati,OH multiple times per 

year for the rest of his life to receive medical treatment. If you take the time to put this in the Federal 

Register, it will delay the process and we may not be able to travel in this timeframe.

If it is necessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA 

Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceeds the weight limits for the 

CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint 

System, this child would be unable to fly. We request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA 

Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though he exceeds the 

manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safety of this child is greatly enhanced by the 

extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide for him during the flight.