Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules 23755 

[Revise 9.4.3a as follows:] 

Intelligent Mail package barcodes 

must bear a human-readable service 

banner with the text ‘‘USPS TRACKING 

#’’ printed in accordance with Exhibit 

708.5.1.4. Other approved extra services 

barcodes must bear a human-readable 

service banner with the text ‘‘USPS 

DELIVERY CONFIRMATION’’ prepared 

in accordance with 708.5.0. 

* * * * * 

10.0 Signature Confirmation 

* * * * * 

10.4 Barcodes 

* * * * * 

10.4.3 Printing 

* * * Labels used for Signature 

Confirmation must meet these 

additional specifications: 

[Revise 10.4.3a as follows:] 

a. Intelligent Mail package barcodes 

must bear a human-readable service 

banner with the text ‘‘USPS 

SIGNATURE TRACKING #’’ printed in 

accordance with Exhibit 708.5.1.4. 

Other approved extra services barcodes 

must bear a human-readable service 

banner with the text ‘‘USPS 

SIGNATURE CONFIRMATION’’ 

prepared in accordance with 708.5.0. 

* * * * * 

700 Special Standards 

* * * * * 

705 Advanced Preparation and 

Special Postage Payment Systems 

* * * * * 

7.0 Combining Package Services and 

Parcel Select Parcels for Destination 

Entry 

7.1 Combining Parcels—DSCF and 

DDU Entry 

7.1.1 Qualification 

[Revise the last sentence of 7.1.1 as 

follows:] 

* * * Parcels claiming destination 

entry pricing must bear a unique 

Intelligent Mail package barcode or 

extra services barcode, including a 

postal routing code, prepared under 

708.5.0. 

* * * * * 

708 Technical Specifications 

* * * * * 

5.0 Standards for Package and Extra 

Service Barcodes 

5.1 Intelligent Mail Package Barcode 

* * * * * 

5.1.4 Physical Barcode Requirements 

* * * Physical barcode requirements 

are as follows: 

* * * * * 

[Revise 5.1.4d as follows:] 

d. Barcode Height: unless allowed by 

exception, the minimum height must be 

at least 0.75 inch. 

* * * * * 

g. Human-Readable Representation of 

Barcode Data and Service Banner: text 

must be printed in accordance with 

Exhibit 5.1.4 and as follows: 

* * * * * 

[Revise 5.1.4g2 as follows:] 

2. Service Banners must include the 

human-readable text ‘‘USPS 

SIGNATURE TRACKING #’’ for 

mailpieces requiring a signature at 

delivery and ‘‘USPS TRACKING #’’ for 

all other mailpieces (service banner text 

shown in Exhibit 5.1.4 is an example). 

See Publication 91 (addendum 

appendix H) at http://ribbs.usps.gov for 

additional information. 

* * * * * 

Exhibit 5.1.4 Barcode Specifications 

[Replace Exhibit 5.1.4 with a revised 

label illustrating the proposed generic 

human-readable service banner text.] 

* * * * * 

We will publish an appropriate 

amendment to 39 CFR Part 111 to reflect 

these changes if our proposal is 

adopted. 

Stanley F. Mires, 

Chief Counsel, Legislative. 

[FR Doc. 2011–10244 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–12–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 50 and 58 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0699; FRL–9300–4] 

RIN 2060–AP38 

Release of Draft Risk and Exposure 

Assessments and Final Integrated 

Review Plan for the National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards for Ozone 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: On or about April 22, 2011, 

the EPA is making available for public 

review the documents titled, ‘‘Ozone 

National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards: Scope and Methods Plan for 

Health Risk and Exposure Assessment,’’ 

(REA Plan for the primary ozone 

NAAQS) and ‘‘Ozone National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards: Scope and 

Methods Plan for Welfare Risk and 

Exposure Assessment’’ (REA Plan for the 

secondary ozone NAAQS). These 

documents contain the plans for the risk 

and exposure analyses that EPA is 

preparing to conduct in support of the 

reviews of ozone NAAQS. EPA is also 

making available to the public the final 

document ‘‘Integrated Review Plan for 

the Ozone National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards’’ (IRP). This document 

contains the plans for the review of the 

air quality criteria and national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS) for 

ozone. The Ozone NAAQS provide for 

the protection of public health and the 

environment from ozone in ambient air. 

DATES: Comments should be submitted 

by June 27, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: These documents will be 

available via the Internet at the 

following Web site: http://www.epa.gov/ 

ttn/naaqs/standards/ozone/ 

s_o3_index.html. Submit your 

comments on the REAs, identified by 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 

0699 by one of the following methods: 

• http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

• E-mail: a-and-r-Docket@epa.gov. 

• Fax: 202–566–9744. 

• Mail: EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0669, 

Environmental Protection Agency, Mail 

code 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC 20460. Please 

include a total of two copies. 

• Hand Delivery: Environmental 

Protection Agency, EPA West, Room 

3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., 

Washington, DC. Such deliveries are 

only accepted during the Docket’s 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008– 

0699. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov (or e-mail). The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

23756 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov, your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket, visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http:// 

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Air and Radiation Docket and 

Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, 

Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., 

NW., Washington, DC. The Public 

Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

excluding legal holidays. The telephone 

number for the Public Reading Room is 

(202) 566–1744, and the telephone 

number for the Air and Radiation 

Docket and Information Center is (202) 

566–1742. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: REA 

Plan for the primary ozone standard: 

John Langstaff, Office of Air Quality 

Planning and Standards (Mail code 

C539–07), U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Research Triangle 

Park, NC 27711; telephone number: 

919–541–1449; fax number: 919–541– 

5315; e-mail address: 

langstaff.john@epa.gov. REA Plan for 

the secondary ozone standard: Travis 

Smith, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards (Mail code C539–07), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711; 

telephone number: 919–541–2035; fax 

number: 919–541–5315; e-mail address: 

smith.jtravis@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information 

A. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this 

information to EPA through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly 

mark the part or all of the information 

that you claim to be CBI. For CBI 

information in a disk or CD–ROM that 

you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the 

disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then 

identify electronically within the disk or 

CD–ROM the specific information that 

is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 

complete version of the comment that 

includes information claimed as CBI, a 

copy of the comment that does not 

contain the information claimed as CBI 

must be submitted for inclusion in the 

public docket. Information so marked 

will not be disclosed except in 

accordance with procedures set forth in 

40 CFR part 2. 

2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. 

When submitting comments, remember 

to: 

• Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date and page number). 

• Follow directions—The agency may 

ask you to respond to specific questions 

or organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

• Explain why you agree or disagree; 

suggest alternatives and substitute 

language for your requested changes. 

• Describe any assumptions and 

provide any technical information and/ 

or data that you used. 

• If you estimate potential costs or 

burdens, explain how you arrived at 

your estimate in sufficient detail to 

allow for it to be reproduced. 

• Provide specific examples to 

illustrate your concerns, and suggest 

alternatives. 

• Explain your views as clearly as 

possible, avoiding the use of profanity 

or personal threats. 

• Make sure to submit your 

comments by the comment period 

deadline identified. 

II. Information Specific to This 

Document 

Two sections of the Clean Air Act 

(CAA) govern the establishment and 

revision of the NAAQS. Section 108 (42 

U.S.C. 7408) directs the Administrator 

to identify and list certain air pollutants 

and then to issue air quality criteria for 

those pollutants. The Administrator is 

to list those air pollutants that in her 

‘‘judgment, cause or contribute to air 

pollution which may reasonably be 

anticipated to endanger public health or 

welfare;’’ ‘‘the presence of which in the 

ambient air results from numerous or 

diverse mobile or stationary sources;’’ 

and ‘‘for which * * * [the 

Administrator] plans to issue air quality 

criteria * * *’’ Air quality criteria are 

intended to ‘‘accurately reflect the latest 

scientific knowledge useful in 

indicating the kind and extent of all 

identifiable effects on public health or 

welfare which may be expected from the 

presence of [a] pollutant in the ambient 

air * * *’’ (42 U.S.C. 7408(b)). Under 

section 109 (42 U.S.C. 7409), EPA 

establishes primary (health-based) and 

secondary (welfare-based) NAAQS for 

pollutants for which air quality criteria 

are issued. Section 109(d) requires 

periodic review and, if appropriate, 

revision of existing air quality criteria. 

The revised air quality criteria reflect 

advances in scientific knowledge on the 

effects of the pollutant on public health 

or welfare. The EPA is also required to 

periodically review and revise the 

NAAQS, if appropriate, based on the 

revised criteria. Section 109(d)(2) 

requires that an independent scientific 

review committee ‘‘shall complete a 

review of the criteria * * * and the 

national primary and secondary ambient 

air quality standards * * * and shall 

recommend to the Administrator any 

new * * * standards and revisions of 

existing criteria and standards as may be 

appropriate * * *.’’ Since the early 

1980s, this independent review function 

has been performed by the Clean Air 

Scientific Advisory Committee 

(CASAC). 

Presently, EPA is reviewing the 

NAAQS for ozone. Key components of 

this review include a quantitative 

population exposure analysis and health 

risk assessment and a quantitative 

ecosystem exposure and welfare risk 

analysis. OAQPS has developed Risk 

and Assessment Plans (REA Plans) for 

Ozone Health Risk and Exposure and 

Ozone Welfare Risk and Exposure 

which include a discussion of the scope, 

approaches, and methods that staff is 

planning to use in conducting the 

exposure analysis and health and 

welfare risk assessment. The draft REA 

Plans and final IRP document 

announced today have been developed 

as part of the planning phase for the 

review. These documents will be 

available on the EPA’s Technology 

Transfer Network (TTN) Web site at 

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/ 

standards/ozone/s_o3_index.html in the 

‘‘Documents for Review Initiated in 

2008’’ section under ‘‘Planning 

Documents.’’ 

The REA Plans are being made 

available for consultation with CASAC 

and for public comment. Comments 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS

Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 82 / Thursday, April 28, 2011 / Proposed Rules 23757 

should be submitted to the docket, as 

described above, by June 27, 2011. The 

CASAC consultation on these planning 

documents is scheduled for May 19–20, 

2011. A separate Federal Register notice 

will provide details about this meeting 

and the process for participation. 

Dated: April 25, 2011. 

Mary Henigin, 

Acting Director, Office of Air Quality Planning 

and Standards. 

[FR Doc. 2011–10340 Filed 4–27–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1179; FRL–9299–8] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Infrastructure SIP Requirements for 

1997 8-Hour Ozone and PM2.5 National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve 

some elements and conditionally 

approve other elements of certifications 

submitted by Illinois, Indiana, 

Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, and 

Wisconsin regarding the infrastructure 

requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and 

(2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the 

1997 eight-hour ground level ozone 

national ambient air quality standards 

(1997 ozone NAAQS) and 1997 fine 

particle national ambient air quality 

standards (1997 PM2.5 NAAQS). The 

requirements are designed to ensure that 

the components of each State’s air 

quality management program are 

adequate to meet the State’s 

responsibilities under the CAA. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before May 31, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– 

OAR–2007–1179, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow 

the on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (312) 692–2551. 

4. Mail: John M. Mooney, Chief, Air 

Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 77 

West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. 

5. Hand Delivery: John M. Mooney, 

Chief, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 

Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only 

accepted during the Regional Office 

normal hours of operation, and special 

arrangements should be made for 

deliveries of boxed information. The 

Regional Office official hours of 

business are Monday through Friday, 

8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID EPA–R05–OAR–2007–1179. 

EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at http:// 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through http:// 

www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The 

http://www.regulations.gov Web site is 

an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an e-mail comment directly 

to EPA without going through http:// 

www.regulations.gov your e-mail 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the http:// 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

will be publicly available only in hard 

copy. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in http:// 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation 

Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is 

open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, excluding 

Federal holidays. We recommend that 

you telephone Andy Chang, 

Environmental Engineer, at (312) 886– 

0258 before visiting the Region 5 office. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Andy Chang, Environmental Engineer, 

Attainment Planning and Maintenance 

Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 

Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–0258, 

chang.andy@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document whenever 

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

EPA. This SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

section is arranged as follows: 

I. What should I consider as I prepare my 

comments for EPA? 

II. What is the background of these 

submittals? 

A. What State submittals does this 

rulemaking address? 

B. Why did the States make these 

submittals? 

III. What criteria is EPA using to judge these 

submittals? 

IV. What did EPA find from its review of 

these submittals? 

A. Section 110(a)(2)(A)—Emission Limits 

and Other Control Measures 

B. Section 110(a)(2)(B)—Ambient Air 

Quality Monitoring/Data System 

C. Section 110(a)(2)(C)—Program for 

Enforcement of Control Measures 

D. Section 110(a)(2)(D)—Interstate 

Transport 

E. Section 110(a)(2)(E)—Adequate 

Resources 

F. Section 110(a)(2)(F)—Stationary Source 

Monitoring System 

G. Section 110(a)(2)(G)—Emergency Power 

H. Section 110(a)(2)(H)—Future SIP 

Revisions 

I. Section 110(a)(2)(I)—Nonattainment Area 

Plan or Plan Revisions Under Part D 

J. Section 110(a)(2)(J)—Consultation With 

Government Officials; Public 

Notifications; Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration; Visibility Protection 

K. Section 110(a)(2)(K)—Air Quality 

Modeling/Data 

L. Section 110(a)(2)(L)—Permitting Fees 

M. Section 110(a)(2)(M)—Consultation/ 

Participation by Affected Local Entities 

V. What action is EPA taking? 

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

I. What should I consider as I prepare 

my comments for EPA? 

When submitting comments, 

remember to: 

1. Identify the rulemaking by docket 

number and other identifying 

information (subject heading, Federal 

Register date, and page number). 

2. Follow directions—EPA may ask 

you to respond to specific questions or 

organize comments by referencing a 

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part 

or section number. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with PROPOSALS