alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Goldmark and others, Appellants, vs. Roseneeld and others, Respondents.

*September 26*

*October 11, 1887.*

*Appeal, when lies from order.*

*An*order for judgment dismissing the action with costs, and also striking from the files an amended complaint, and dissolving two injunctional- orders granted by a court commissioner, is one which involves the merits and necessarily affects the judgment, and under sec. 3070, E. S., it is reviewable upon appeal from the judgment. After judgment has been entered, no appeal will lie from such an order.

*470APPEAL from the County Court of *Milwaukee*County.

The case sufíiciently appears in the opinion.

For the appellants it was submitted on the brief of *Wallber &*Wahl, attorneys, and *Moses, Newman & Reed*and *A. J. Pittenhoefer,*of counsel.

They contended, *inter alia',*that it was improper to join a motion to strike out a pleading with a motion for judgment. *Fellows v. Prest, etc. of Menasha,*11 Wis. 559.

For the respondents there was a brief by *J. G. MoKenney*and *A. G. Brazee,*and oral argument by *Mr. MoKenney.*

By the Court.

This is an appeal from an order for judgment dismissing the action with costs, made by the county court February 26, 1887. The order also strikes from the files an amended complaint, and dissolves two injunctional orders granted in the action by a court commissioner. Judgment was regularly entered pursuant to the order, on March 22, 1887, dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint, and for costs. This appeal was taken March 28th. It is therefore too late. No appeal lies after judgment from an interlocutory order reviewable on an appeal from the judgment. Vic*tor S. M. Co. v. Heller,*41 Wis. 657; *Thornton v. Eaton,*45 Wis. 621. This order is so reviewable. R. S. sec. 3070.

The appeal must be dismissed.
#### Hyman Mitchell, Respondent, *v.*William J. O’Hara, Appellant, and Henry Kaufman, Impleaded Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

December 8, 1937.

*Blecheisen & Whalen [Jacob Blecheisen*of counsel], for the appellant.

*Morris Bauman,*for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

It was error to submit the false arrest cause of action to the jury. It is conceded that the defendant was assaulted, and thereafter he reported the matter to the police authorities, who, acting on their own responsibility, arrested the plaintiff. Defendant may be liable for malicious prosecution, but he cannot be sued for false arrest. The case having been submitted to the jury on both causes of action, it is impossible to determine upon which the verdict is founded. There must be a reversal if either theory is unsupported by adequate evidence.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Hammer, JJ.
#### Francis A. Campbell, Plaintiff, *v.*Cora M. Carroll Campbell, Defendant.

Supreme Court, St. Lawrence County,

December 14, 1937.

*Arthur B. Hart,*for the plaintiff.

Laurence, J.

This is an action to establish the matrimonial status of the plaintiff. Defendant answered but does not now appear.

The defendant was married to David Carroll in New York State on April 25, 1924. They had their domicile in New York State. On January 29, 1930, defendant filed a complaint in Reno, Nev., asking for a divorce against her husband. The summons was ordered published and thereafter, and on February 6, 1930, the summons was served in New York State on the defendant in that action, David Carroll. The defendant in that action, David Carroll, did not appear nor submit to the jurisdiction of the Nevada court. On March 24, 1930, a divorce was granted to this defendant, plaintiff in that action, by the Nevada court on the ground of cruelty. It would seem that such divorce decree is not recognized here and is null and void. After securing such decree, the defendant returned to New York State and on May 12, 1930, the parties *246to this action were married in the State of Connecticut. A few days prior to May 12, 1930, they went to Connecticut and made application for the marriage license. They then returned to New York State and after a lapse of five days, required by the Connecticut law, they returned to Connecticut and a marriage ceremony was performed. They then returned to New York State, where they lived as husband and wife for six years.

The laws of Connecticut recognize a Nevada divorce as valid. It is apparent that these parties have their marital status in New York State. The question presented is whether the plaintiff, under the circumstances here, can secure relief by declaratory judgment. He is not an innocent party to the transaction. He says he had knowledge of defendant’s previous marriage but thought that she had been divorced. The fact that he went to Connecticut to secure a marriage license and then in about a week returned to that jurisdiction for the purpose of having the marriage ceremony performed, stamps his action as an endeavor to avoid a marriage in New York State and the consequences which might follow. His actions have brought about the marital complications which he now seeks to use to secure affirmative relief by declaratory judgment. y The complaint is dismissed.
# C_2014136EN.01000201.xml

| 6.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

5 May 2014

2014/C 136/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3874 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,44 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4639 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82293 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0844 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2174 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2605 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,436 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,09 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2087 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4402 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9132 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4975 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5242 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7557 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5996 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7343 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 427,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5833 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6645 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5965 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 980,13 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5177 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,739 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,7115 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,882 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0909 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0938 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,3800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3874

JPY

Japanese yen

141,44

DKK

Danish krone

7,4639

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82293

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0844

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2174

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2605

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,436

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,09

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2087

RON

Romanian leu

4,4402

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9132

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4975

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5242

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7557

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5996

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7343

KRW

South Korean won

1 427,24

ZAR

South African rand

14,5833

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6645

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5965

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 980,13

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5177

PHP

Philippine peso

61,739

RUB

Russian rouble

49,7115

THB

Thai baht

44,882

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0909

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0938

INR

Indian rupee

83,3800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTIN PINEDA MARTINEZ;

HELADIA GONZALEZ DE PINEDA,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-73694

Agency Nos. A096-064-308

 A096-064-309

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMTIH, Circuit Judges. 

Martin Pineda Martinez and Heladia Gonzalez de Pineda, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

FILED

SEP 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-73694

removal order. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss in

part and deny in part the petition for review. 

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s discretionary determination that

petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a

qualifying relative. 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424

F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005). 

To the extent petitioners contend that the BIA’s streamlined order did not

demonstrate sufficient consideration of the hardship factors in denying their

cancellation of removal applications, their challenge is foreclosed by Falcon

Carriche v. Ashcroft, 350 F.3d 845, 851 (9th Cir. 2003).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.
# C_2015015EN.01000201.xml

| 17.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 15/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 15/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 January 2015

(2015/C 15/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1588 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4346 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,76370 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4085 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0128 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7985 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,795 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 320,37 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3179 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5083 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,6888 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4113 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3946 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,9830 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4871 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5363 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 248,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4030 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1926 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6930 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 581,91 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1234 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,684 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,6580 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,798 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0357 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9787 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,6857 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1588

JPY

Japanese yen

135,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4346

GBP

Pound sterling

0,76370

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4085

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0128

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7985

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,795

HUF

Hungarian forint

320,37

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3179

RON

Romanian leu

4,5083

TRY

Turkish lira

2,6888

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4113

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3946

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,9830

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4871

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5363

KRW

South Korean won

1 248,70

ZAR

South African rand

13,4030

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1926

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6930

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 581,91

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1234

PHP

Philippine peso

51,684

RUB

Russian rouble

75,6580

THB

Thai baht

37,798

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0357

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9787

INR

Indian rupee

71,6857

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015357EN.01000201.xml

| 29.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/2

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 357/02)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Monaco

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 800th anniversary of the construction of the first Castle on the rock

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows a tower on the top of the rock. At the top the name of the issuing country ‘MONACO’ flanked by the Paris mint mark and the mint master mark. At the bottom, the inscription ‘FONDATION DE LA FORTERESSE’ (Foundation of the fortress), flanked by the years ‘1215’ and ‘2015’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  :

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2016017EN.01000201.xml

| 19.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 17/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 17/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7884 — Atos/Unify)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 17/03)

On 11 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7884. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7884. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016308EN.01000201.xml

| 24.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 August 2016

(2016/C 308/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1339 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 113,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4423 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,85995 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4673 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0896 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2875 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,49 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3126 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4568 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3247 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4823 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4625 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7914 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5482 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5297 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 265,68 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2793 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,5301 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4862 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 991,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5645 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,635 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,1995 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,232 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,6146 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6848 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,0496 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1339

JPY

Japanese yen

113,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4423

GBP

Pound sterling

0,85995

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4673

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0896

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2875

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,49

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3126

RON

Romanian leu

4,4568

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3247

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4823

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4625

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7914

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5482

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5297

KRW

South Korean won

1 265,68

ZAR

South African rand

15,2793

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,5301

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4862

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 991,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5645

PHP

Philippine peso

52,635

RUB

Russian rouble

73,1995

THB

Thai baht

39,232

BRL

Brazilian real

3,6146

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6848

INR

Indian rupee

76,0496

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>   1

                                                                    EXHIBIT 16.1

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20549

September 17, 1998

Commissioners:

We have read the statements made by Aetna Industries, Inc. (Commission File No.
333-11801) and MS Acquisition Corp. (Commission File No. 333-11801-01) (copy
attached), which we understand will be filed with the Commission, pursuant to
Item 4 of Form 8-K, as part of Aetna's and MS's Form 8-K Current Report dated
September 15, 1998. We agree with the statements concerning our firm in such
Form 8-K.

Very truly yours,

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


                                       33
SRP Coronado Generating Station

Sample 

ID #

Total amount of 

fuel represented 

by sample, tons 

or gallons

Total 

sulfur,

 %

Higher

 heating value,

Btu/lb

Ash 

content,

 %

Mercury

ppm

Chlorine,

ppm

Flourine,

ppm

Nickel,

ppm

Other

trace

metal

HAP

ppm 

45

JRMCRD003 14,329.620 0.47 8,831 5.23% 0.194

JRMCRD011 14,398.740 0.33 8,700 4.70% 0.156

JRMCRD008 14,346.490 0.41 8,758 5.15% 0.154

JRMCRD006 14,624.370 0.46 8,901 5.04% 0.145

JRMCRD010 14,645.030 0.31 8,816 4.80% 0.143

JRMCRD014 14,608.570 0.44 8,786 5.32% 0.132

JRMCRD002 12,693.360 0.48 8,822 5.24% 0.131

JRMCRD017 14,279.050 0.33 8,802 5.19% 0.131

JRMCRD009 14,472.470 0.30 8,806 4.74% 0.129

JRMCRD001 14,539.160 0.39 8,854 5.12% 0.122

JRMCRD007 14,207.490 0.30 8,845 4.54% 0.121

JRMCRD012 14,528.250 0.31 8,829 5.18% 0.114

JRMCRD015 14,569.630 0.44 8,747 5.37% 0.114

JRMCRD016 14,531.450 0.44 8,780 5.99% 0.111

JRMCRD013 14,592.640 0.40 8,865 4.95% 0.106

JRMCRD019 14,669.550 0.46 8,789 5.86% 0.092

JRMCRD005 14,623.900 0.31 8,841 4.54% 0.091

JRMCRD018 14,558.910 0.45 8,819 5.41% 0.084

SCMCRD001 14,275.925 0.32 9,405 3.84% 0.065

SCMCRD003 13,789.575 0.31 9,328 4.58% 0.054

SCMCRD002 14,388.225 0.27 9,431 4.00% 0.032

Coal Shipment Data
# C_2015143EN.01000401.xml

| 30.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 143/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 143/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 143/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Germany

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Hessen from the ‘Lander’ series

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design depicts a classic perspective on St. Paul’s Church in Frankfurt (the ‘Paulskirche’ was the seat of Germany’s first freely elected legislative body in 1849 and is regarded as the cradle of German democracy) and is therefore the perspective possessing the greatest recognition value. The design incisively brings out the tension between the dominant tower and the elliptical structure of the church. The slightly exaggerated flight of steps has an inviting quality while simultaneously offering support to the subjacent inscription ‘HESSEN’ (the Federal State of Hessen in which St. Paul’s Church is situated).The inner part also features the year ‘2015’ and the mint mark of the respective mint (‘A’, ‘D’, ‘F’, ‘G’ or ‘J’) at the left side as well as the issuing country’s indication ‘D’ and the engraver’s mark (the initials ‘HH’ — Heinz Hoyer) at the right side.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 30 million

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  :

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---