alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2016101EN.01000301.xml

| 17.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 101/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 101/3

---

RESERVE LIST

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST/135/15

HEADS OF ADMINISTRATION (AST 4) IN EU DELEGATIONS

(2016/C 101 A/02)

| ARANA SANCHEZ | Juan |
| --- | --- |
| ARTIGAUT | Benoit |
| BOLNEVA MIHAYLOVA | Tanya |
| BOSMA | Jitze |
| BUSCOT | Sylvie |
| CLEMENSAT | Olivier |
| COSTACHE | Silviu |
| DALPANE | Davide |
| DURAN NAVARRO | Jaime |
| EFFTING | Franciscus Christianus Theodorus |
| FARAUS | Nicolas |
| GARCIA ALCAZAR | Alvaro |
| GLAVIND | Birgitte Sakstrup |
| GONZALEZ GUERRERO | Daniel |
| GUTIERREZ GARCIA | Diego Manuel |
| HARMSEN | Elisabeth Maria |
| HEUBERGER | Andreas |
| LANZUELA DE ALVARO | Javier |
| LAPPART-RAULSTON | Beatrice |
| LASECA | Iciar |
| MALBAŠIĆ | Damir |
| MARINO | Pascal |
| MARION | Emmanuelle |
| QUINTARD | Jerome |
| TOVAR BADT | Samira Adelaida |
| VAN DER BIJL | Dina Johanna |
| VAN DOORN | Marcel |
| VANDEPUT | Jan |
| VERSCHOOR | Jaco |
| WILLEMS | Roos |

ARANA SANCHEZ

Juan

ARTIGAUT

Benoit

BOLNEVA MIHAYLOVA

Tanya

BOSMA

Jitze

BUSCOT

Sylvie

CLEMENSAT

Olivier

COSTACHE

Silviu

DALPANE

Davide

DURAN NAVARRO

Jaime

EFFTING

Franciscus Christianus Theodorus

FARAUS

Nicolas

GARCIA ALCAZAR

Alvaro

GLAVIND

Birgitte Sakstrup

GONZALEZ GUERRERO

Daniel

GUTIERREZ GARCIA

Diego Manuel

HARMSEN

Elisabeth Maria

HEUBERGER

Andreas

LANZUELA DE ALVARO

Javier

LAPPART-RAULSTON

Beatrice

LASECA

Iciar

MALBAŠIĆ

Damir

MARINO

Pascal

MARION

Emmanuelle

QUINTARD

Jerome

TOVAR BADT

Samira Adelaida

VAN DER BIJL

Dina Johanna

VAN DOORN

Marcel

VANDEPUT

Jan

VERSCHOOR

Jaco

WILLEMS

Roos

The reserve list will be valid until 30 June 2019.

30 June 2019

---
# C_2016186EN.01000101.xml

| 25.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7772 — Western Digital/Sandisk)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 186/01)

On 4 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

In the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7772. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7772. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 23, 2016

Order 

Clerk

November 23, 2016

154462(66)

LARRY ELVIN, Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 154462

v COA: 326563; 326566

Lapeer CC: 11-044707-NM

KARL GUBERT, DVM, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellee to extend the time 

for filing his answer to the application for leave to appeal is GRANTED. The answer

submitted on November 15, 2016, is accepted for filing.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In the Interest of K.L.M. and L.M.C., 

Children

No. 06-17-00110-CV

Appeal from the County Court at Law of 

Lamar County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 85989). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellants have adequately indicated their inability to pay costs of appeal. 

Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED FEBRUARY 21, 2018

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





May 13, 2010By:
/s/Pengcheng ChenPengcheng Chen,CEO
sio-ioo: 

Vo rtnei ^ /Q\AJ>U A'rla^ S ^o.i'v4ytcc4- -Vo 

^ hcAO L t>«€tr x 4oJv)TQ^ 4 ^ KKX^I^re . Cv. <j O =vVx
Exhibit 4.1 Specimen Stock Certificate

             NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED BY TRANSFER AGENT
               INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF

                                     Nevada

                NUMBER                                    SHARES
       ------------------------                  -------------------------
      (                        )                (                         )
      (                        )                (                         )
      (                        )                (                         )
       ------------------------                  -------------------------
                                                   CUSIP NO. 44860F 10 3

                               HYBRID FUELS, INC.

           AUTHORIZED COMMON STOCK 50,000,000 SHARES * PAR VALUE 5801


THIS  CERTIFIES  THAT

                                    SPECIMEN
                                      ONLY

IS  THE  RECORD  HOLDER  OF


                    Shares of HYBRID FUELS, INC. Common Stock

Transferable on the books of the Corporation in the person or by duly
authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent
and registered by the Registrar.

     Witness  the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile
     signatures of  its  duly  authorized  officers.

Dated:

                                HYBRID FUELS, INC.
                                    CORPORATE
_________________________________     SEAL      ___________________________
             SECRETARY                                  PRESIDENT
                                     NEVADA


NOT VALID UNLESS COUNTERSIGNED                    Countersigned
       BY TRANSFER AGENT          Standard Registrar & Transfer Company, Inc.
                                   12328 South 1840 East * Dimox, Utah 64028
                                              By:__________________________
                                                   Authorized Signature



All restricted stock issued by the Company is endorsed with the following
legend:

THESE SHARES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
AS AMENDED, HAVING BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT WITH A
VIEW TO REDISTRIBUTE.  THEY MAY NOT BE SOLD OR OFFERED FOR IN ABSENCE OF AN
EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AS TO THE SHARES UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT
OF 1933 AS AMENDED, OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE CORPORATION
AND AN EXEMPTION FROM THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 AS AMENDED, IS AVAILABLE AND
THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED, OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE THAT SUCH
SHARES MAY BE SOLD UNDER RULE 144 AS PROMULGATED BY THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF THE UNITED STATES.
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

3/31/2015 COA No. 01-13-00851-CR

GUANCHE, ERIK SANTANA Tr. Ct. No. 1869024 PD-0190-15

The Appellant’s Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The

Court requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this office within three (3)

days pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in the refusal of the

petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

1ST COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

301 FANNIN

HOUSTON, TX 77002-7006

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
(1980). Due process requires, in part, that these revocations include a

written statement of the evidence and reasoning upon which the district court relied. 

### See Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 786 (1973). Transcribed oral findings ordinarily satisfy this requirement, so long as the oral findings make the basis of the revocation and the evidence relied upon sufficiently clear. 

### United States v. Sesma-Hernandez, 253 F.3d 403, 405-06 (9th Cir. 2001). "[S]pecific findings with reference to the evidence supporting charges are not constitutionally required where a defendant raises no objection to the sufficiency or accuracy of the evidence, and the district court finds that the government sufficiently proved the charged conduct." 

### Id. at 409.

Here, appellant raised no objection to the sufficiency or accuracy of the evidence at the revocation hearing; he merely disputed the outcome. Appellant expressly conceded all of the facts relevant to our inquiry and only argued that these stipulated facts did not constitute substantive violations of his probation. Contrary to appellant's contention, the record clearly establishes that appellant violated multiple conditions of his probation. Under the circumstances of this case, we conclude that appellant has not demonstrated that the district court

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A cat.abused its discretion by revoking his probation and entering an amended

judgment of conviction. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

J.

Cherry

cc: Eighth Judicial District Court Dept. 15 Reza Athari & Associates PLLC Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 3
(tip 1947A 47

. 4e1/4.
# ibera l

crossroad s o f

commerce 

# ^.fc^:©^:-iM? ^

The 

# GIT Yof LIBERA L P.O . BO X219 9 > LIBERAL , KANSA S 67905-219 9

• ^ >•%Qs• •

• o C O ' • y -JuJy27,20i L; ; . ' .•••_'•' :

• Mr ; "Denni s J.DeVany,.Chie f •

- ,. - EA S an dDomesti c Analysi s Division , X-5 3 ' >'. ^ U.S . Department.o f Transportatio n, ', : " .

. ' ' c 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S E..';;. . . . ' • . ' ' '•••:,•• • • Washington , DC . 2059 0 • : '•' "•'^''••Jy-\\\\ ' •'" • ','• " '•'•.:: • '.•.[ : J:-. : . >

, Re : U S DO TEssentia l Ai r Servic eBid s for . Liberal , Kansa s , . .••-. . ••. ' Dea r

Mr.,DeVany: . • •',.•.'••.,•';.;•;,.•• . ,'••... " .. ' ,'•.•• • V-- . v. - ; • Thi s letter'.i s i nsiipport.o f th ecurren t

proposa l of

Grea t Lake s Aviatio nto.provid eflight s from: . Liberal , Kansasto.th eDenve r Internatibnail'.Airpbr.t : Great.Lake s bi dt o provid ethre eweekda y / • ,.••..: • roundtri p flight s an dfou r rpundtri p flights'o nth eweeken dt o DenVerwil l continu et o provide / ; ou r cpitimunit y wit hcost-effective , convenien t .connection s t o th enation' s ai r transportation/• . • Z : •/ • : • syste'm;:- ; .'••

• '••... ' •••.'".. • ;'•••• • '.•...'•• : •'••.•..•: • -'. y ••'••'.':••::.' • . ''• " '•:'•-• : .•... • .Ove r

th eyears,'Libera l ha s demonstrate dth eneed-fo r schedule dai r

service . Area.traveler s • - " ; '••:'•• [ . • . hav esupporte dai r servic efror hLibera l t o Denve r offere db y th eairline.; : Ir i addition;-.EA S i s . '• '

. • • ; . . .v. - -ver y importan t

t o ou r cornmuhit y b y providin g quaUt y o f Uf et o th ecirizens.o f

Libera l an dv - ••.••. ; surrouridin g regio nan doffering. agrea t economi c tool,when , recruitiri g ne w businesses . ./..' • ••.;• . ..: , Grea t Lake s Aviatio nha s ha dapresenc e i nLibera l fo r man y year s and-ha dprovided-grea t air.. . • ' transportatio nwit hgoo dcormectiori s whU ebein g agoo dcommunit y par^ ^ ' . ' V-' . Than k

yo u fo r considerin g our.comm'ents. . •:••. , • • ..•',.'... ' •••.•••••••.•;.• .
• Sjinc^erely ,
EXHIBIT32

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

18U.S.C. SECTION1350,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Accessory Specialists Incorporated (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the"Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

-  The    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the    Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/Anthony N.DeMint                       

AnthonyN. DeMint

Presidentand Chief Accounting Officer

October27, 2003
(logo)HOMESIDE
LENDING, INC.



March 26, 1997



Ms. Tracey A. Waldman
Servicer Compliance Supervisor
Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562



Re:   Officer's Certificate
Calendar Year Ending December 31, 1996



Dear Ms. Waldman:

As an officer of HomeSide Lending, Inc. (HomeSide),  I certify to the best of my
knowledge on behalf of the loans HomeSide  services for Norwest Bank  Minnesota,
N.A. as to the following:



1. I have reviewed the activities and performance of HomeSide during the
preceding fiscal year under the terms of the Servicing Agreement and to the best
of this officer's knowledge, HomeSide has fulfilled all of its duties,
responsibilities or obligations under this Agreement
throughout such year;
2. I have  confirmed  that  HomeSide  is  currently  an  approved  FNMA or FHLMC
Servicer in good standing;
3. I have  confirmed  that the fidelity bond and errors and omissions  insurance
policy required under the Servicing Agreement is in full force and effect;
4. All premiums for each hazard  insurance  policy,  flood insurance  policy (if
applicable)  and PMI  policy (if  applicable),  with  respect to each  mortgaged
property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies are in full force
and effect;
5. All real estate taxes,  governmental  assessments and other expenses  accrued
and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance on any mortgaged
property, have been paid;
6. All custodial accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

                                                             (logo)EQUAL HOUSING
     Post Office Box 44090, Jacksonville, FL 32231-4090 904-281-3000      LENDER


(logo)HOMESIDE
LENDING, INC.





7. All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of  Mortgage  Property
required per Section 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively,
have been prepared and filed.

HomeSide  has  recently  renewed  its errors and  omissions  and  fidelity  bond
coverage.  An Evidence of  Insurance  form will be sent to the  attention of Ms.
Kimberly  Ferrel within ten days. You have previously been advised of our change
of fiscal year end to the twelve month  period  ending the last day of February.
The audited financial  statements with  accompanying  audit letters will be sent
within 90 days of our new fiscal year end, also to the attention of Ms. Ferrel.

Finally, enclosed is the completed Servicer Information form as supplied by you.
Should you have any questions please contact Lynda M. Pohwat at (904)281-4705.


Sincerely,


/s/Terry Salazar
Terry Salazar
Vice President


lp
enc.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15196]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06466]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force


United States Air Force Academy Board of Visitors; Notice of 
Federal Advisory Committee Meeting; Cancellation

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, United States Air Force Academy Board 
of Visitors (USAFA BoV), Department of the Air Force, DoD.

ACTION: Quarterly meeting notice; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On Thursday, February 26, 2015 (38 FR 10462), the Department 
of Defense published in the Federal Register, a notice to announce the 
quarterly meeting of the United States Air Force Academy Board of 
Visitors on Monday, March 16, 2015, beginning at 10:15 a.m. The meeting 
was cancelled due to last-minute circumstances indicating there would 
not be a quorum for the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The next scheduled USAFA BoV meeting 
has not been established, but will be published in the Federal Register 
at least 15 days prior to the meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Meeting Announcement: The Designated Federal Officer (DFO) for the 
Board of Visitors of the U.S. Air Force Academy has cancelled the 
previously scheduled meeting for March 16, 2015. Due to the timing of 
this decision, which was beyond the control of the Department of 
Defense or the DFO, the DFO was unable to ensure compliance with the 
requirements of 41 CFR 102-3.150(a). Accordingly, the Advisory 
Committee Management Officer for the Department of Defense, pursuant to 
41 CFR 102-3.150(b), waives the 15-calendar day notification 
requirement.

Henry Williams Jr.,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer, DAF.
[FR Doc. 2015-06466 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
| (1) |     the      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) |     information      contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                         /s/ David A.    Martin                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                         David      A. Martin                                        Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer                                        (Principal      Financial Officer) |
OCIS Toronto

Jan. 2010 testing of Phenolic Based Binder /March 2010 Quantum Binder on T-1 Line

Forming Section January March

lbs/hr Phenolic Quantum

M 5 / 202 Filterable Particulate 29.2 17.8

M 5 / 202 Condensable Particulate 5.05 1.53

M 5 / 202 Total Particulate 34.3 19.3

Pull Tons/hour 6.23 6.25

Phenol 3.03 < .22

Formaldehyde 4.51 0.14

Methanol 2.14 < .03

Acetic Acid < 0.116 < .21

Formic Acid <. 12 < .21

Acetaldehyde < .028 < .024

Acrolein < .02 < .015

The Oven was not tested due to the ~ 98% destruction efficiency of the RTO.

Cooling Section January March

lbs/hr Phenolic Quantum

Phenol 0.019 < .020

Formaldehyde 0.104 No Sample

Methanol < .0035 No Sample

Acetic Acid 0.064 0.073

Formic Acid 0.028 0.08

Acetaldehyde < .34 No Sample

Acrolein < .22 No Sample
um Binder on T-1 Line
# C_2015286EN.01000101.xml

| 29.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 286/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 286/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7645 — Mylan/Perrigo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 286/01)

On 29 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7645. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7645. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
99-1239.

#### State v. Smith.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-871. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution of sentence and to continue bond,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay of execution of sentence and to continue bond be, and hereby is, denied.