alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2015

No. 04-14-00719-CV

 04-14-00723-CV

THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION D.P., As a 

Mentally Ill Person,

From the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-MH-3187, 2014-MH-3096

Honorable Oscar J. Kazen, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is GRANTED. The

appellee’s brief is due on February 20, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 4.16





The principles of the settlement between Top Image Systems Ltd. (hereinafter: The Company) and holders of Debentures (Series A) (hereinafter: the Holders)




Payment for trust (11 million NIS) and payment of interest




The Company will pay The Holders the first payment of the debentures’ trust (hereinafter: The First Payment), as well as the interest due on December 31st, 2009, as follows:




a.
A sum of 5.83 million NIS from The First Payment will be paid on December 31st, 2009;




b.
the interest payment due on December 31st, 2009 will be paid on time;




c.
a sum on 2 million NIS from The First Payment will be paid within 3 business days of the approval of this settlement, with an annual interest rate of 9% for the postponement period;




d.
No later than June 30th, 2010, the Company will pay the remainder of The First Payment of the debentures trust (hereinafter: The First Payment Remainder), with an annual interest rate of 9% for the postponement period.




Capital Raising


The Company will strive to the best of its ability to raise the necessary capital (by issuing rights or by another method). At the same time, the Company will consider replacing the debt as detailed below.




Debt Replacement


The trust note will be amended to reflect that the Company is entitled to repay the remainder of the undefrayed debentures at an early payment. In addition, the Company will be obligated to pay the remainder of the undefrayed debentures at an early payment in the case that an exit event occurs in which all or the majority of the Company’s stock is sold. If early payment as detailed above will occur by June 30th, 2010, these early payments will be made in exchange for 80% of the remainder of the debentures trust and the accumulated interest by the day of payment. In order to remove any doubts it is hereby clarified that the above is not to diminish in any way the company’s obligation to pay the First Payment Remainder in full, as detailed above.




Payment Distribution for Debentures Fund


The trust note will be amended to reflect that the remainder of the debentures fund (after the First Payment of 11 million NIS) will be distributed to seven equal payments of 4.7 million NIS each (hereinafter: Trust Distribution). The Company may postpone the payment of the second payment for the debentures’ fund no later than June 30th, 2011, with an annual interest rate of 9% for the postponement period.




Interest


Any fund payment that will be postponed as part of the payment distribution, beyond its payment date according to the current trust note will have an annual interest rate of 9% for the postponement period. The interest for postponement will be distributed evenly in the fund, so that the actual interest of the undefrayed remainder of the debentures will be constant.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15587]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06683]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Air Force

Notice of Intent To Grant a Partially Exclusive Patent License

AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of Part 404 of Title 37, Code of 
Federal Regulations, which implements Public Law 96-517, as amended; 
the Department of the Air Force announces its intention to grant NBD 
Nanotechnologies, Inc. a corporation of the State of Delaware, having a 
place of business at 8 St. Mary's Street, Room 611, Boston, MA 02215.

DATES: The Air Force intends to grant a license for the patent and 
pending applications unless a written objection is received within 
fifteen (15) calendar days from the date of publication of this Notice.

ADDRESSES: Written objection should be sent to: Air Force Materiel 
Command Law Office, AFMCLO/JAZ, 2240 B Street, Rm. 101, Wright-
Patterson AFB, OH 45433-7109; Facsimile: (937) 255-3733.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Air Force Materiel Command Law Office, 
AFMCLO/JAZ, 2240 B Street, Rm. 101, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH 45433-
7109; Facsimile: (937) 255-3733.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A partially exclusive license (exclusive 
with respect to the fields of footwear and circuit boards) in any 
right, title, and interest of the Air Force in: U.S. Application No. 
13/624,151, entitled, ``SYNTHESIS OF FUNCTIONAL FLUORINATED POLYHEDRAL 
OLIGOMERIC SILSESQUIOXANE,'' by Timothy S. Haddad et al., filed on 21 
September 2012, published as U.S. Application Publication No. 2013/
0072609, and claiming benefit of and priority to U.S. Provisional 
Application 61/537,122, filed 21 September 2011; and U.S. Application 
No. 14/013,600, entitled, ``CONTROLLED POLYMERIZATION OF FUNCTIONAL 
FLUORINATED POLYHEDRAL OLIGOMERIC SILSESQUIOXANE MONOMERS,'' by Sean M. 
Ramirez et al., and filed on 29 August 2013.

Henry Williams,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-06683 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-10-P
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

      ( print page 16386)    
The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 13, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

                    1.                     *Ronald Young Schram, Palm Beach, Florida, and Frank Jay Hessel,*                     Coral Gables, Florida, both to retain voting shares of Flagler Bank, West Palm Beach, Florida.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 24, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-07033 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
FILED

April 23, 1998

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate C ourt Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

APRIL 1998 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, )

) C.C.A. NO.02C01-9710-CR-00382

Appellee, )

) SHELBY COUNTY

VS. )

) NO. 96-13311 Below

AARON L. DRUMMER, )

)

Appellant. ) RULE 20 ORDER

ORDER

The defendant, Aaron L. Drummer, pled guilty to possession with intent to

sell or deliver ten (10) pounds of marijuana, a Class E felony. He agreed to a

sentence of one (1) year and a $3,000 fine, the manner of sentence to be

determined by the trial court. At the conclusion of the sentencing hearing, the

trial court denied alternative sentencing. The defendant was immediately

incarcerated.

On appeal the defendant contends the trial court erred in denying

alternative sentencing. However, it appears to this Court that the defendant has

been released from incarceration. The issue, therefore, is moot. See State v.

Samuel D. Perry, C.C.A. No. 02C01-9611-CR-00435, Shelby County (Tenn.

Crim. App. filed January 29, 1998, at Jackson); State v. Terry Moore, C.C.A. No.

02C01-9509-CC-00257, Madison County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed August 2, 1996,

at Jackson).

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in

accordance with Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals. Costs are

taxed to the State of Tennessee, as it appears the defendant is indigent.
2

_________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

_________________________

WILLIAM M. BARKER, JUDGE
April 28, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

PACIFIC WESTERN BANK , AS SUCCESSOR BY ME RGER TO CAPITALSOURCE BANK , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00366

- CV V.

BRAZORIA COUNTY , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of ap pellee, Brazoria County, signed April 24, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgme nt. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Pacific Western Bank, as successor by merger to CapitalSource Bank, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,308,013
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  100,380
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    731,331
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,277,580
<PP&E>                                      16,792,063
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,661,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,745,002
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,238,482
<BONDS>                                      1,807,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       370,057
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,328,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,745,002
<SALES>                                          1,442
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,442
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,412,040
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              73,601
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,436,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,436,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,436,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 10, 2022

No. 04-21-00094-CV

CITY OF EAGLE PASS,

Appellant

v.

Isabel Velasquez PEREZ, individually and a/n/f of Vanessa Velasquez, minor,

Appellee

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-01-35130-MCV

Honorable Maribel Flores, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

On March 23, 2022, appellee filed a “Motion to Issue Mandate, or in the Alternative, 

Renewed Motion to Lift Stay.” On April 4, 2022, appellant filed a response. Appellee’s Motion 

is DENIED. 

It is so ORDERED on May 10, 2022.

 PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: ______________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of China  Biopharmaceuticals  Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         i. the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         ii. the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the  Company and will be  furnished  to the SEC or its staff
upon request.

  /s/ HUNAG Chentai
-----------------------
HUANG Chentai
Chief Financial Officer
February 4, 2005

This  Certification  of Chief Financial  Officer  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 is not  "filed"  for  purposes  of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  but is  instead  furnished  as  provided  by
applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 19

- 00424

- CR

M ARIO H ERNANDEZ

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from

Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County ( 1513167D )

July 1, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in the trial court’s ju dgment. The trial court ’ s judgment is modified (1) to

delete and replace “1/17/2019” as the “Da te Sentence Imposed” with “11/11/2019 ”

and (2) to add “Not Gu ilty” as the “Plea to the Offense.” It is ordered that the trial

court ’ s judgment is affirmed as mo d ified.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
# C_2015253EN.01001001.xml

| 1.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 253/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 253/10

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 253/09)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

To celebrate thirty years of the EU flag, euro-area Finance Ministers decided that euro-area Member States would strike a 2-euro commemorative coin using a common design on the national side. Euro-area citizens and residents have selected by public web-voting the winning design. Voters had a choice of five designs, which had been pre-selected by a professional jury following a design competition among European Mints, and they choose the design created by Mr Georgios Stamatopoulos, professional designer at the Bank of Greece.

Issuing country
  : Slovenia

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 30th anniversary of the EU flag

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The designs shows the EU flag as a symbol that unites people and cultures with shared visions and ideals for a better common future. Twelve stars that morph into human figures are embracing the birth of a new Europe. At the top right, in semi-circle, are the issuing country ‘SLOVENIJA’ and the years ‘1985-2015’. At the bottom right are the initials of the artist (Georgios Stamatopoulos).

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : 4th quarter 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0125-14

VERA ELIZABETH GUTHRIE-NAIL, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE'S MOTION FOR REHEARING

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

COLLIN COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion. MEYERS,

J., did not participate.

O P I N I O N

Having granted the State's motion for rehearing in this case, and

having considered its merits, we now conclude that the State's motion

was improvidently granted. We deny the State's motion for rehearing.

No further motions for rehearing will be entertained.
D

elivered:November23,2016

Publish
#### Rockwell and others vs. Elderkin.

A verdict should not be set aside merely on the ground that one of the jurors had removed to another county before the trial, which fact was unknown to the parties at the time of the trial.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Walworth*County.

The circuit court set aside a verdict for the plaintiffs and granted a new trial in this cause, on affidavits showing that one of the jurors had removed from said county to Dane county, and that this fact was not known to the defendant or his attorney, before the trial. The plaintiffs appealed from the order.

*Winsor &*Smith, for appellants,

argued that the only qualifications for a juror prescribed by the statutes of this state, are citizenship of the United States and the right to vote in this state. The only statutory disqualifications are, 1st, Conviction of an infamous crime. 2d, Having served as a juror in the same county within one year. R. S., ch. 118. The objection would not have been good even if taken at the trial; much less could it avail after verdict.

*Henry Cousins,*for respondent:

The common law jury in all courts of record in our. territo*368'ry, at tbe time of tbe adoption of tbe constitution, was “ twelve good and lawful men of tbe body of tbe county.” 2 Wis., 22; 3 Blacks. Comm., 349, 352, 360; 4 id., 349-50. Tbe same qualification is required in civil as in criminal causes (R. S., ch. 179, sec. 1), that tbe juror shall be “of the county or district wherein,” &c. Constitution, Art. 1, sec. 7. The jurors are officers of the court (Wharton’s Law Die., 409) — judicial officers, and as essential to constitute the judiciary as the judge on the bench, being judges of fact in all cases, and in some of both law and fact. Cons., Art. 1, sec. 3. They are liable to be called and recalled to attend on the court at any time before its final adjournment, for the term for which they may be chosen. R. S., ch. 118, sec. 20. Their office is local in its duties, confined to the county, and can be discharged by none but residents thereof. R. S., ch. 14, sec. 2. One of the jurors being incompetent, the verdict is void. 2 Grra. & Wat. on N. T., 189-90; 5 Smedes & M., 373; 1 How. (Miss.), 30; 7 id., 671; 6 Blackf., 461. An objection to a juror which would be a good cause for challenge, if not discovered until after verdict, is good ground for a new trial. 1 B. Mon., 213; 15 Yt., 61; 32 Me., 310.

*By the*Court,

DixoN, C. J.

The circumstance of *Mderhin*having discovered, after the trial, that one of the jurors had removed from the county, is not in our opinion sufficient cause for granting a new trial. If the objection had been taken before trial, by way of challenge, it might have prevailed on strictly technical grounds; but after trial we think it is too late. It is an objection which does not affect the impartiality or intelligence of the juror, and furnishes no presumption against the justice of tlje verdict. We think it should be disregarded after verdict.

Order reversed.
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-09-11T23:13:59Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-09-11T23:14:00Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-09-11T23:14:00Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="11194">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="capture">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="1">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-09-11T23:13:59Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<div class="ocr">6690

WITH DRA
AND NOT
2E (SBUED
</div>

</div>
</body></html>