alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015392EN.01000501.xml

| 25.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 November 2015

(2015/C 392/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0651 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,52 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4605 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70620 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2622 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0832 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2090 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,033 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,89 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2607 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4467 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0675 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4763 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4229 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2547 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6368 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5074 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 229,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,9808 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8048 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6335 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 618,17 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5192 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,145 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,4467 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,141 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9550 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6141 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,6582 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0651

JPY

Japanese yen

130,52

DKK

Danish krone

7,4605

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70620

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2622

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0832

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2090

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,033

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,89

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2607

RON

Romanian leu

4,4467

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0675

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4763

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4229

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2547

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6368

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5074

KRW

South Korean won

1 229,46

ZAR

South African rand

14,9808

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8048

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6335

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 618,17

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5192

PHP

Philippine peso

50,145

RUB

Russian rouble

70,4467

THB

Thai baht

38,141

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9550

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6141

INR

Indian rupee

70,6582

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# CA2014119EN.01000501.xml

| 23.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 119/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 119/5

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 119 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

---
# C_2015295EN.01000301.xml

| 8.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 295/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 295/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 September 2015

(2015/C 295/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1146 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4614 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73035 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4197 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0871 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2645 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,026 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,03 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2298 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4343 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3717 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6062 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4802 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6382 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7801 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5901 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 339,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5102 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0954 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5565 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 948,73 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8327 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,366 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,1067 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,253 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2798 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,8887 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,5187 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1146

JPY

Japanese yen

133,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4614

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73035

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4197

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0871

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2645

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,026

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,03

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2298

RON

Romanian leu

4,4343

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3717

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6062

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4802

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6382

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7801

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5901

KRW

South Korean won

1 339,65

ZAR

South African rand

15,5102

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0954

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5565

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 948,73

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8327

PHP

Philippine peso

52,366

RUB

Russian rouble

76,1067

THB

Thai baht

40,253

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2798

MXN

Mexican peso

18,8887

INR

Indian rupee

74,5187

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015111EN.01000401.xml

| 1.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 March 2015

(2015/C 111/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0759 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4697 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72730 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2901 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0463 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7035 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,533 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,43 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0854 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4098 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8131 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4154 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3738 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3422 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4388 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4774 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 192,58 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1324 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,6710 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6450 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 053,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9873 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 48,057 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,4400 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,018 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4958 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,5124 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,2738 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0759

JPY

Japanese yen

128,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4697

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72730

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2901

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0463

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7035

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,533

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,43

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0854

RON

Romanian leu

4,4098

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8131

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4154

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3738

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3422

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4388

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4774

KRW

South Korean won

1 192,58

ZAR

South African rand

13,1324

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,6710

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6450

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 053,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9873

PHP

Philippine peso

48,057

RUB

Russian rouble

62,4400

THB

Thai baht

35,018

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4958

MXN

Mexican peso

16,5124

INR

Indian rupee

67,2738

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016058EN.01000102.xml

| 13.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7865 — LOV Group Invest/De Agostini/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 58/02)

On 20 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7865. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7865. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of China Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1) The report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and

2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                                         
| | ----------------------------------------
| | /s/ Zhang Jian                          
| |                                         
| |                                         
| | Zhang Jian                              
| | Chairwoman and Chief
  Financial Officer
| | October 29,
  2009                      

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 58 (Thursday, March 26, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16043-16044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd.; Order of 
Suspension of Trading Pursuant to Section 12(K) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934

March 24, 2015.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is 
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of 
Winsonic Digital Media Group, Ltd. (``Winsonic'') because it has not 
filed any periodic

[[Page 16044]]

reports since the period ending September 30, 2008, or any reports 
since June 2011.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the 
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of Winsonic.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of 
Winsonic is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 24, 
2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on April 7, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07040 Filed 3-24-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40552 Summary Calendar

JAMES DINKINS , Petitioner

- Appellant

v.
CHARLES A. DANIELS, Warden,
Respondent

- Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CV

- 339

Before WIENER, HIGGINSON, and COSTA, Circuit Judges. STEPHEN A. HIGGINSON, Circuit Judge : * James Dinkins was convicted in the District of Maryland in 2009 of

cons piracy to distribute narcotics under 21 U.S.C. § 846; murder with intent to prevent attendance and testimony in an official proceeding and prevent communication of information about a federal offense to law enforcement under 18 U.S.C. § § 1512(a)(1)(A) and (C); use of a firearm to further a drug

trafficking crime under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(iii); and willfully causing the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 30, 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40552 Document: 00513574294 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/30/2016No. 15

- 40552
death of a person through use of a firearm in furtherance of a drug

- trafficking crime under § 924(j). He sought 28 U.S.C. § 2255 relief in 2013, but was denied. He instituted this case under 28 U.S.C. § 22 41 to challenge his convictions and sentences. In his current appeal, Dinkins asserts that two cases

— Arthur An derson LLP v. United States , 544 U.S. 696 (2005) , and Fowler v. United States , 563 U. S. 668 (2011)

— establish that the conduct for which he was convicted was not criminal

. T hose decisions predated hi s § 2255 motion and therefore may not be urged in a § 224 1 challenge in connection with the § 2255 ( e ) savings clause , which requires, among other things, that the petitioner’s claim was foreclosed by circuit law when it should have been raised in the petitioner’s trial, appeal, or first § 2255 motion

. See Garland v. Roy , 615 F.3d 391, 394 (5th Cir. 2010)

. And to the extent that Dinkins may be understood to persist in a claim of factual, rather than legal, innocence, he fails to show that f actual innocence creates an exception to the requirement s for challe nging a conviction and sentence in a § 2241 petition. S ee § 2255(e); Garland , 615 F.3d at 394. The district court did not error by conclud ing that § 2241 relief was unavailable to Dinkins , see J effers v. Chandler , 253 F.3d 827, 83 1 (5th Cir. 2001) , and dismissing his § 2241 petition

. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 15-40552 Document: 00513574294 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/30/2016
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00745-CV

Charles N. Draper, Appellant

v.

Greg Guernsey, in his Official Capacity as Director of Planning and Development

Watershed Protection Review Department; and City of Austin, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 419TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-GN-13-000778, HONORABLE KARIN CRUMP, JUDGE PRESIDING

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

In this cause, Charles N. Draper, pro se, has timely appealed a final judgment, signed

on October 18, 2016, granting summary judgment against claims he had asserted against the

appellees. Draper has now filed a “Trial Court Past-Due Notice Finding of Fact and Conclusion of

Law, and Notice of Appellant’s Brief,” the chief focus of which is to complain that the district court

is refusing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding its summary-judgment ruling.

Draper further seeks “permission” to appeal the district court’s refusal to make findings and

conclusions. We will dismissthis request as moot because no such “permission” is necessary in this

appeal from a final judgment. We will instead treat Draper’s request as a supplement to his notice

of appeal giving specific notice of his intent to challenge the district court’s refusal to make findings

and conclusions.
Draper also gives “notice” that he intends to file his appellant’s brief within

ninety days after the date he filed his notice of appeal, which would be February 1, 2017. Treating

this “notice” as a motion to extend Draper’s deadline to file his appellant’s brief until February 1,

which would amount to an extension of roughly 45 days beyond the general 30-day deadline, we 1

grant the extension.

We emphasize, however, that none of these rulings should be construed as endorsing

Draper’s premise that he is entitled to findings of fact and conclusions of law in this summaryjudgment case.

It is ordered on November 30, 2016.

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Bourland

The clerk’s record was filed on November 15, 2016, and no reporter’s record was 1

requested, so the general thirty-day deadline would be December 15. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). 

2
January 20, 2016 

Dear Mr. Celedon: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−5320). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 2/3/16. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267–2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Program Analyst
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

YOGENDRA S. DHANIK and BHARTI )

Y. DHANIK, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D13-5292

)

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL )

ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for LUMINENT )

MORTGAGE TRUST 2007-2, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 9, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; William H. Burgess, III, Judge.

Michael E. Rodriguez of Foreclosure 

Defense Law Firm, P.L., Tampa, for 

Appellants.

Dean A. Morande and Michael K. Winston 

of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West 

Palm Beach, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Judge.

Yogendra and Bharti Dhanik appeal a final judgment of foreclosure. The 

Dhaniks argue, and HSBC Bank USA concedes, that the bank failed to present

sufficient trial evidence of standing at the time it filed the complaint. 
- 2 -

"This court reviews the sufficiency of the evidence to prove standing to 

bring a foreclosure action de novo." Lamb v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC, 174 So. 3d 1039, 

1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). 

"A plaintiff alleging standing as a holder must prove it is a holder of the 

note and mortgage both as of the time of trial and also that the (original) plaintiff had 

standing as of the time the foreclosure complaint was filed." Russell v. Aurora Loan 

Servs., LLC, 163 So. 3d 639, 642 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (quoting Keifert v. Nationstar 

Mortg., LLC, 153 So. 3d 351, 352 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)). "If the plaintiff is not the payee 

of the original note, the plaintiff must also prove that the original note contains an 

[e]ndorsement in favor of the plaintiff (special [e]ndorsement) or an [e]ndorsement in 

blank." Id. To establish standing, the endorsement "must have been made prior to the 

filing of the lawsuit." Id.

Although the bank attached a copy of the mortgage and note to the 

complaint, those copies lacked any endorsement to the bank or a blank endorsement. 

The note introduced at trial contained a blank endorsement. However, the bank offered 

no evidence as to when the blank endorsement was placed on the note. Thus, there 

was no evidence before the trial court that the bank had standing at the time the 

foreclosure complaint was filed. "The bank's failure to prove a prima facie case 

warrants dismissal." May v. PHH Mortg. Corp., 150 So. 3d 247, 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2014).

As in Russell and May, we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter 

an order of involuntary dismissal based on the bank's lack of standing at the time it filed

the complaint. 

Reversed and remanded with instructions. 
- 3 -

NORTHCUTT and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 2, 2016

No. 04-15-00596-CR

Isidro Espinosa SOLIS,

Appellant

v.

The State of TEXAS,

Appellee-s

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR2691

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s counsel, Pat Montgomery, has filed a motion for extension of time requesting 

an extension of time until December 9, 2016 to file the appellant’s brief. We grant the motion. 

We order Pat Montgomery to file appellant’s brief by December 9, 2016. If counsel fails to file 

the brief by the date ordered, we may order him to appear before this court to show cause why he 

should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with the court’s order. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 2nd day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court