## N EW 

## Y ORK 

## S TATE 

## E NERGY 

## R ESEARCH AND 

## D EVELOPMENT 

## A UTHORITY 

## F INAL 

## R EPORT 

## 10-01 A PRIL 

## 2010 

# E UROPEAN 

# W OOD 

# -H EATING 

# T ECHNOLOGY 

# S URVEY 

# : A N 

# O VERVIEW OF 

# C OMBUSTION 

# P RINCIPLES AND THE 

# E NERGY AND 

# E MISSIONS 

# P ERFORMANCE 

# C HARACTERISTICS

OF 

# C OMMERCIALLY 

# A VAILABLE 

# S YSTEMS IN 

# A USTRIA 

# , G ERMANY 

# , D ENMARK 

# , N ORWAY 

# , AND 

# S WEDEN

### The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) is a public benefit corporation created in 1975 by the New York State Legislature.
NYSERDA derives its revenues from an annual assessment levied against sales by New York’s electric and gas utilities, from public benefit charges paid by New York rate payers, from voluntary annual contributions by the New York Power Authority and the Long Island Power Authority, and from limited corporate funds.
NYSERDA works with businesses, schools, and municipalities to identify existing technologies and equipment to reduce their energy costs. Its responsibilities include:
• Conducting a multifaceted energy and environmental research and development program to meet New York State’s diverse economic needs.

• The New York Energy $mart SM 

### program provides energy efficiency services, including those directed at the low-income sector, research and development, and environmental protection activities.
• Making energy more affordable for residential and low-income households.
• Helping industries, schools, hospitals, municipalities, not-for-profits, and the residential sector, implement energy-efficiency measures. NYSERDA research projects help the State’s businesses and municipalities with their energy and environmental problems.
• Providing objective, credible, and useful energy analysis and planning to guide decisions made by major energy stakeholders in the private and public sectors.
• Since 1990, NYSERDA has developed and brought into use successful innovative, energy-efficient, and environmentally beneficial products, processes, and services.
• Managing the Western New York Nuclear Service Center at West Valley, including: overseeing the State’s interests and share of costs at the West Valley Demonstration Project, a federal/State adioactive waste clean-up effort, and managing wastes and maintaining facilities at the shut-down State-Licensed Disposal Area.
• Coordinating the State’s activities on energy emergencies and nuclear regulatory matters, and monitoring low-level radioactive waste generation and management in the State.
• Financing energy-related projects, reducing costs for ratepayers.
For more information, contact the Communications unit, NYSERDA, 17 Columbia Circle, Albany, New York 12203-6399; toll-free 1-866-NYSERDA, locally (518) 862-1090, ext. 3250; or on the web at www.nyserda.org

S TATE OF 

### N EW 

### Y ORK 

### E NERGY 

### R ESEARCH AND 

### D EVELOPMENT 

### A UTHORITY 

### David A. Paterson, Governor Vincent A. DeIorio, Esq., Chairman Francis J. Murray, Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer

# E UROPEAN 

# W OOD 

# -H EATING 

# T ECHNOLOGY 

# S URVEY 

# : A N OVERVIEW OF 

## C OMBUSTION 

## P RINCIPLES AND THE 

## E NERGY AND 

## E MISSIONS 

## P ERFORMANCE 

## C HARACTERISTICS OF 

## C OMMERCIALLY 

## A VAILABLE 

## S YSTEMS IN 

## A USTRIA 

## , G ERMANY 

## , D ENMARK 

## , N ORWAY 

## , AND 

## S WEDEN



### Final Report

Prepared for the 

## N EW 

## Y ORK 

## S TATE 

## E NERGY 

## R ESEARCH AND 

## D EVELOPMENT 

## A UTHORITY Albany, NY www.nyserda.org

Ellen Burkhard, Ph.D.

Sr. Project Manager

and

Nathan Russell Assistant Project Manager

Prepared by: 

## B IOENERGY 

## 2020+G MB 

## H Wieselburg, Austria
DI Dr. Birgit Musil-Schläffer Project Manager

with
Aislinn McCarry, BSc DI Dr. Christoph Schmidl DI Dr. Walter Haslinger

Collaborators

April 2010 NYSERDA Report 10-01 NYSERDA 15566i 

# Preface

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) is pleased to publish, “European Wood-Heating Technology Survey: An Overview of Combustion Principles, Performance Characteristics of Commercially Available Systems.” The report was prepared by BIOENERGY 2020+ GmbH. The principle investigator was DI Dr. Birgit Musil-Schläffer, with collaboration from Aislinn McCarry, BSc, DI Dr. Christoph Schmidl, and DI Dr. Walter Haslinger.

BIOENERGY2020+ GmbH (www.bioenergy2020.eu), formerly the Austrian Bioenergy Centre, is a Competence Center for Excellent Technologies with locations in Graz, Güssing and Wieselburg, Austria. The purpose of the Competence Center is to research, develop, and demonstrate the “Energetic use of Biomass” by partnering with universities, technical and research institutes, government agencies and companies. BIOENERGY 2020+ comprise a staff of 80 researchers with expertise that covers all research anddevelopment topics in the field of biomass energy,including small-, medium-, and largescale biomass combustion and biomass based combined heat and power production (CHP) systems. The overall objective of the work performed is to substantially contribute to the improvement of existing techno logies and the development of new technologies, as well as the research and development of the utilization of new biomass fuels.

This report provides a summary of the combustion principles, thermal efficiency and emissions performance of biomass heating technologies of Austria, Germany, Denmark, Norway and Sweden. A key asp ect is that the report has presented these performance characteristics in terms of American methodology and units. This information illustrates the technological advances that have been made through technology forcing policies, eco-labeling, and financial incentives. The report therefore provides critical information to assist NYSERDA develop a high-efficiency biomass heating market and assist the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency assess current best demonstrated technology on which to base revisions to the residential wood heater New Source Performance Standard.

NYSERDA’s Biomass Heating Program is a joint effort of the Environmental R&D and Building R&D Programs to develop a high-efficiency biomass heating market of technologies with acceptable emissions performance in New York State.ii 

# Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority. NYSERDA appreciates the guidance of the following: Mr. Gilbert Wood, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Ms. Lisa Rector, Northeast States for Coordinated Air Use Management; Dr. Thomas Butcher and Mr. Roger J. McDonald, Brookhaven National Laboratory; and Mr. Raymond J. Albrecht, P.E., Fulton Thermal Corporation.



# Abstract

This report provides a summary of the combustion principles, thermal efficiency and emissions performance of biomass heating technologies in Austria, Germany, Denmark, Norway and Sweden. A key asp ect is that the report has pr esented these performance characteristics in terms of American methodology and units. This information illustrates the technological advances that have been made over the last several decades. For example, over the past 30 years, the Austrian boiler technology increased from a thermal efficiency of 55% to more than 90% based on Net Calorific Value. A survey of the boilers in these countries shows those in the Top 25% of thermal efficiency and emissions performance greatly exceed not only the curren t European Standard (EN 303-5) performance requirements (classes 1, 2, and 3) but also the proposed requirements (classes 4 and 5). Technology forcing policies, regulations, and eco-labelling efforts clearly resulted in greatly improved technology now available in Europe which is expanding into the American wood heating market as well. The report therefore provides critical information to assist NYSERDA develop a high-efficiency biomass heating market and assist the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency assess current best demonstrated technology on which to base revisions to the residential wood heater New Source Performance Standard.



# Keywords:

biomass heating, wood boiler, pellet boiler, room heater, masonry heater, thermal efficiency, lower heating value, higher heating value, net calorific value, gross calorific value, particulate matter, total suspended particulate, CO.iii 

# Table of Contents

Preface .................................................................................................... i Acknowledgements .................................................................................. ii Abstract .................................................................................................. ii Keywords ................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents

..................................................................................... iii List of Abbreviations ................................................................................ vii Unit and Conversion Factors .................................................................... viii

Executive Summary ............................................................................ ES-1 Summary ...................................................................................... ES-6

1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 1-1.1 Calorific value and efficiency ................................................................. 1-3 1.1.1 Chemical compisition ................................................................ 1-3

1. 1.2 Calorific Value ......................................................................... 1-5
1. 1.2.1 Measurement and conversion...................................... 1-5
1. 1.2.2 Formula from Boie .................................................... 1-7

1. 1.3 Conversion factors ................................................................... 1-8



### 2 Biomass combustion technology ......................................................... 2-1

2.1 Overview – combustion principles ........................................................... 2-1
2.1.1 Staged combustion .................................................................. 2-1
2.1.2 Manual stoking ........................................................................ 2-1
2.1.3 Automated stoking ................................................................... 2-2

2.2 Small scale combustion systems ............................................................ 2-5
2.2.1 Room heaters.......................................................................... 2-5 2.2.1.1 Fireplaces ................................................................. 2-6 2.2.1.2 Pellet stoves ............................................................. 2-6 2.2.1.3 Pellet stoves with hot water production ......................... 2-7 2.2.1.4 Wood stoves ............................................................. 2-8 2.2.1.5 Masonry heaters ........................................................ 2-9 2.2.2 Boilers ................................................................................. 2-11 2.2.2.1 Pellet boilers ........................................................... 2-11 2.2.2.2 Solid wood boilers.................................................... 2-12 2.2.2.3 Wood chip boilers .................................................... 2-13 2.2.2.4 Combined boiler technologies .................................... 2-14
2.3 Medium to large scale combustion ........................................................ 2-15
2.3.1 Fixed-bed combustion ............................................................ 2-15 2.3.1.1 Underfeed stokers ................................................... 2-15iv 2.3.1.2 Grate furnaces ........................................................ 2-16 2.3.2 Fluidised bed combustion ........................................................ 2-18 2.3.2.1 Bubbling fluidised bed combustion (BFB) ..................... 2-18 2.3.2.2 Circulating fluidised bed (CFB) combustion .................. 2-19 2.3.3 Dust combustion .................................................................... 2-20



### 3 Emissions ........................................................................................ 3-1

3.1 Conversion factors ............................................................................... 3-1

3.2 Carbon Monoxide (CO) .......................................................................... 3-2 3.2.1 General .................................................................................. 3-2
3.2.2 Measurement .......................................................................... 3-3 3.2.3 Reduction ............................................................................... 3-3

3.3 Total Organic Bound Carbon/Organic Gaseous Substances (OGC) ................ 3-5 3.3.1 General .................................................................................. 3-5
3.3.2 Measurement .......................................................................... 3-5
3.3.3 Reduction ............................................................................... 3-5
3.4 Dust · Particulate Matter (PM) · Totals Suspended Particulate Matter (TSP) ... 3-5 3.4.1 General .................................................................................. 3-6
3.4.2 Measurement .......................................................................... 3-8
3.4.3 Reduction ............................................................................... 3-9 3.4.3.1 Primary measures ...................................................... 3-9 3.4.3.2 Secondary measures .................................................. 3-9
3.5 Nitroxen Oxides (NO X ) ........................................................................ 3-13
3.5.1 Measurement ........................................................................ 3-15
3.5.2 Reduction ............................................................................. 3-16 3.5.2.1 Primary measures .................................................... 3-16 3.5.2.2 Secondary measures ................................................ 3-17



### 4 European Test Methods ..................................................................... 4-1

4.1 Residential heating systems ................................................................... 4-2
4.1.1 EN 303-5: Heating boilers for solid fuels, hand and automatically stoked ................................................................................... 4-2
4.1.2 EN 12809: Residential independent boilers fired by solid fuel ......... 4-4
4.1.3 EN 12815: Residential cookers fired by solid fuel .......................... 4-4
4.1.4 EN 13229: Inset appliances including open fires fired by solid fuels . 4-4
4.1.5 EN 13240: Room-heaters fired by solid fuel ................................. 4-6
4.1.6 EN 14785: Residential space heating appliances fired by wood pellets .................................................................................... 4-8
4.1.7 EN 15250: Slow heat release appliances fired by solid fuel ............. 4-9

4.2 Commercial heating systems ............................................................... 4-11
4.3 Summary .......................................................................................... 4-12v 

### 5 Regulations for biomass installations ................................................... 5-1

5.1 European level ..................................................................................... 5-2
5.1.1 Regulations for boilers .............................................................. 5-2
5.1.2 Regulations for room heaters ..................................................... 5-4
5.2 National levels ..................................................................................... 5-4
5.2.1 Austria ................................................................................... 5-5 5.2.2 Germany ................................................................................ 5-8 5.2.3 Denmark .............................................................................. 5-12
5.2.4 Finland ................................................................................. 5-14 5.2.5 Sweden ................................................................................ 5-15



### 6 Performance of biomass installations ................................................... 6-1

6.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 6-1
6.1.1 Data sources ........................................................................... 6-1 6.1.2 Selection method for TOP 25% performing appliances ................... 6-2
6.2 Stoves/room-heaters ............................................................................ 6-2 6.2.1 Pellet stoves ........................................................................... 6-2
6.2.2 Wood stoves ........................................................................... 6-4
6.2.3 Masonry heaters ...................................................................... 6-6
6.3 Boilers ................................................................................................ 6-6 6.3.1 Pellet boiler ............................................................................. 6-6 6.3.2 Solid wood boiler ..................................................................... 6-8
6.3.3 Wood chip boiler .................................................................... 6-10 6.3.4 Combined technologies ........................................................... 6-12
6.3.5 Summary ............................................................................. 6-14
6.4 Commercial biomass installations ......................................................... 6-16
6.4.1 Data collection of Austrian medium scale biomass appliances (Musil et al. 2006) ................................................................. 6-16
6.4.2 Data collection of Swiss automated biomass appliances (Hasler et al. 2000) ................................................................ 6-18
6.4.3 Emission factors .................................................................... 6-21
6.4.4 Summary ............................................................................. 6-22



### 7 Emission control technologies ............................................................. 7-1

7.1 Emission control technology for PM/dust .................................................. 7-1
7.1.1 Small scale appliances .............................................................. 7-1
7.1.2 Medium scale appliances ........................................................... 7-2



### 8 European Biomass Fuel Requirements ................................................. 8-1

8.1 General remarks .................................................................................. 8-1vi 8.2 European Bio-fuel standards .................................................................. 8-3
8.2.1 Origin of Bio-fuels .................................................................... 8-3
8.2.2 Specification of solid bio-fuels based on traded forms and properties8-3
8.2.3 Revision of EN14961:2005 ........................................................ 8-4
8.3 European countries with national pellet standards ..................................... 8-5 8.3.1 Austria ................................................................................... 8-5 8.3.1.1 OeNORM M 7135 ....................................................... 8-5 8.3.1.2 OeNORM M 7136 ....................................................... 8-5 8.3.1.3 OeNORM M 7137 ....................................................... 8-6 8.3.2 Germany ................................................................................ 8-6 8.3.2.1 DIN 51731 ................................................................ 8-6 8.3.2.2 DIN plus Standard ..................................................... 8-6 8.3.2.3 Certification of pellet logistics ...................................... 8-6 8.3.3 Sweden .................................................................................. 8-6
8.3.4 Italy ...................................................................................... 8-6
8.3.5 United Kingdom ....................................................................... 8-7
8.4 Additional environmental or quality labels ................................................ 8-7
8.5 Summary of European and national property specifications for bio-fuels ....... 8-9



### 9 Heat storage (accumulator tank) ........................................................ 9-1

9.1 Introduction ........................................................................................ 9-1
9.2 Dimensioning ...................................................................................... 9-2
9.2.1 General aspects ....................................................................... 9-2 9.2.2 Sizing guidelines ...................................................................... 9-3 9.2.3 EN 303-5 ................................................................................ 9-4



### 10 Energy from non-Woody Biomass Fuels .............................................. 10-1

10.1 Emissions and efficiencies of solid non wood biomasses ........................... 10-1
10.1.1 Fuels & fuel properties ............................................................ 10-1 10.1.2 Emissions ............................................................................. 10-2 10.1.3 Efficiencies ........................................................................... 10-3
10.1.4 Slagging & Corrosion .............................................................. 10-4
10.2 Summary .......................................................................................... 10-5



### A Literature ........................................................................................ A-1

B Annex ............................................................................................. B-1vii 

# List of Abbreviations

a Ash in kg/kg
Btu British Thermal Unit CHP Combined heat and power
CO Carbon monoxide d.b. dry basis FJ-BLT Franciso Josephinum Wieselburg Biomass Logistics Technology

g gram GCV gross calorific value (upper heating value) h hydrogen content of the fuel in kg/kg HC Hydrocarbons
J Joule lb pound

m meter NCV net calorific value (lower heating value) Nm3 m3 at normal conditions (1 atm, 32 °F) NO Nitrogen monoxide

NO 2 Nitrogen dioxide
NO X Nitrogen oxides
O 2 Oxygen OGC Organic Gaseous Substances
PM Particulate Matter

P nominal load in MBtu/h TSP Total Suspended Particulates w water content of the fuel related to the mass of wet biomass in kg/kg (w.b.)

W Watt
w.b. wet basis  Efficiency

 GCV Efficiency based on GCV

 NCV Efficiency based on NCVviii 

# Units and basic conversion factors

Prefixes according to DIN 1301
Abbreviation Name Value M Mega 10 6 k Kilo 103 d Deci 10 -1 c Centi 10 -2 m Milli 10 -3

Example: 1 MW (1 Megawatt) = 103 kW (1,000 Kilowatt) = 10 6 W (1,000,000 Watt) Custom prefixes for North America (in correlation with Btu)
Abbreviation Value MBtu 10 3 ·Btu MMBtu 10 6 ·Btu

Calorific value [CV] [CV] = 1 J/g = 0.43 Btu/lbDensity [] [] = 1 g/m3 = 6.23·10 -5 lb/ft 3 Energy [E] [E] = 1 Btu = 1055 J Length [l] [l] = 1 m = 39.2701 in = 3.28084 ft Mass [m] [m] = 1 g = 2.2046·10 -3 lb Power [P] [P] = 1 W = 3.4121 Btu/h Volume [V] [V] = 1 m3 = 1·10 3 l, 1 m 3 = 35.3147 ft 3

Exchange rate Euro – Dollar 1 € = 1.478 US$ES-1 

# Executive Summary

The New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA) is supporting R&D efforts to promote the development of a high-efficiency biomass heating market in New York State. High-efficiency biomass equipment has significantly lower emissions than their low-efficiency counterparts. This is particularly important, considering the United States Environment al Protection Agency (EPA) is currently updating the emissions performance requirments of all residential wood heating technologies. These New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) revisions will require that all newly manufactured heating systems meet emission levels representative of the current best demonstrated technology based on a world-wide survey. The Europeans, more specifically Austria, Germany, and Scandinavian countries Denmark, Norway, and Sweden , are considered leaders in the development of this technology. BIOENERGY 2020+ prepared this report for NYSERDA to provide a comprehensive overview of biomass technologi es in these countri es. The report provides critical information to assist NYSERDA with the development of a high-efficiency biomass heating market and to help EPA assess the current best demonstrated technology on which to base revisions to the residential wood heater NSPS. A key aspect of this study is the description of the European methodology for determining thermal efficiency using the net calorific value (lower heating value) of the wood fuel and the conversion of this value to the gross calorific value (upper heating value) used to determine thermal efficiencies by the U.S. heating industry. Throughout this report thermal efficiency values are convert ed to the American convention using gross calorific value. The emissions for “dust” or Total Suspended Particulates are converted to pounds per million British thermal unit (lb/MMBtu), the common unit used in the United States. Other emissions are normalized to values at standard conditions at 12% O 2 levels in the flue gas. Legislative regulations and incentives on national and European levels are used in the European Union to continuously improve the performance of biomass appliances. In the European Standard EN 303-5, which regulates performance requirements for solid fuel boilers, three classes (class 1 to 3) for efficiency requirements and emission limits are defined in order to embrace the diverse technology stages of the EU member states. In the revision of EN 303-5, which is currently under discussion, more stringent classes (class 3 to 5) will be introduced, thereby resulting in the steady increase of the performance of installed biomass appliances. In addition to the EN 303-5, national regulations and eco-labels may request even higher efficiencies and lower emissions. Regional and national financial incentives fo r the installation of biomass appliances are often linked to eco-label requirements.

45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90%

0 300 600 900 1200 1500 nominal load in mBTU/h class 3

class 2

class 1 class 4 class 5efficiency based on GCV Blue Angel (G)/Umweltzeichen (A) Nordic Swan (Scandinavia) Figure ES-1 efficiency requirements for boilers from EN 303-5 (class 1 to class 5) and efficiency requirements from Austrian, German and Scandinavian eco-labels; efficiencies based on GCV were converted for pellets fuelES-2 Austrian biomass boiler technology is a perfect example of how the improvements in combustion technology can be driven by legislativ e requirements and incentives. Figure ES-2 shows the technological improvement of boilers for solid wood, wood chips and pellets (starting in 1998) through test data from FJ-BLT. Over the last 30 years average efficiencies of biomass boilers have increased from approximately 55% to more than 90% based on the NCV(net calorific value) and the average CO-emissions have decreased from 15,000 to less than 50 mg/m3 at 13% O 2 in Austria.

Figure ES-2 Small scale wood combustion systems: Efficiencies and CO emissions measured at the test bench through certification tests since 1980 - data according (FJ-BLT 2005), compilation in (Voglauer 2005)

Modern combustion technology for biomass is based on staged combustion in order to enable maximum burnout rates. In the primary zone located on the grate, drying, devolatilization and solid combustion take place. In the secondary combustion zone, which is situated in the combustion chamber, the volatile gases are burnt with secondary air. In order to minimize emissions, combustion must be as complete as possible in the secondary zone. In Figure ES-3, Figure ES-4 Figure ES-5 and Figure ES-5, the function principles of a solid wood boiler, an underfeed pellet boiler with condensing technology, a pellet boiler with top feed technology, and a pellet boiler with an underfeed burner are illustrated.

Figure ES-3 Under-burning solid wood boiler (Froeling 2005) Figure ES-4 Condensing boiler for wood pellets with underfeed burner (Oekofen 2007)ES-3 The complete combustion of fuel in an optimized 2-stage combustion design results in very low dust (TSP) emissions because it prevents particle formation from unburned hydrocarbons that are absent in the exhaust gas. Figure ES-7 contrasts the chemical composition in an optimized heating appliance and a poorly operated woodstove. The dust from the optimized system is primarily inorganic, while the poorly operated stove emissions are mostly unburned organics and will be a multiple higher in mass than the emissions from the optimized appliance.

Automatic appliance, optimum operation conditions CO < 50 ppm Wood stove, poor operation conditions

CO > 10 000 ppm

Figure ES-7 chemical composition of dust samples from different biomass appliances and operation conditions (Klippel 2007)

The development of solid bio-fuel standards in Europe is linked to the beginning of wood pellet production. In order to gain a common understanding between the manufacturers and the users, codes of good practice, quality guidelines and later national standards have been developed. For the development of high performing combustion appliances, Figure ES-5 Top feed pellets boiler (Evotherm 2010)

Figure ES-6 Underfeed burner or wood chips and pellets (KWB 2007)ES-4 harmonized fuel properties are advantageous becau se the optimization of operating conditions is only possible if the fuel properties are known. The TOP 25% performing biomass appliances that were identified within this study reach high efficiencies and low emissions. Table ES-1 summary of average efficiency and emission data for TOP 25% performing biomass technologies

Figure ES-8 clearly exhibits that efficiencies of the TOP 25% performing pellet boilers far exceed the future requirements of EN 303-5, class 5. The same is true for wood chip and solid wood boilers.technologyfuelload range(MBtu/h) data at nominal loadGCV1)(%)CO(mg/m312%O2)TSP1)(lb/MMBtu)NOx(mg/m312%O2)

boiler pellets < 55 87 43 0.022 140 55 - 100 86 39 0.024 136 100 - 170 87 38 0.023 132 170 - 340 86 24 0.036 154

> 340 86 17 0.031 133

solid wood < 85 83 174 0.039 139 85 - 120 83 220 0.044 126 120 - 170 83 152 0.066 115

> 170 82 97 0.033 119

wood chips < 100 76 60 0.046 157 100 - 200 79 39 0.027 134 200 - 340 78 30 0.038 138 340 - 680 80 22 0.042 125

> 680 78 34 0.092 131 combined

boiler pellets 50 - 150 82 34 0.027 145 solid wood 79 252 0.027 120 stove with hot water pellets 25 - 50 85 117 0.019 143

stove pellets < 30 88 164 0.045 88 > 30 87 180 0.043 110 solid wood 20 - 130 73 1069 0.050 126

75% 80% 85% 90%

0 200 400 600 800 1000 nominal load in mBTU/h class 3 class 4 class 5efficiency based on GCV TOP 25% pellet boilers Figure ES-8 average efficiency performance of TOP 25% pellet boilers in comparison to efficiency requirements of EN 303-5, class 3 and future efficiency requirements of EN303-5, class 4 and 5ES-5 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 solid wood pellets wood chipsdust emission limits in lb/MMBtu

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200

0 200 400 600 800 1000 nominal load in mBTU/h class 3

class 4 class 5

TOP 25% pellet boilers class 2dust emissions in lb/MMBtu

Figure ES-9 dust emission limits for solid wood, wood chips and pellet boilers of EN 303-5, classes 1 to 5 and average dust emissions of the TOP 25% performing pellet boilers.

Figure ES-9 demonstrates that the TOP 25% performing boilers have lower emissions than future EN303-5, class 5 requirements. Figure ES-10 shows the average efficiencies at nominal and partial load for the TOP 25% performing pellet, solid wood and wood chip appliances. For solid wood boilers partial load equals 50% of nominal load, for pellets and wood chip boilers the partial load is 30% of the nominal load. Efficiencies for nominal and partial load are almost identical. Solid wood and wood chip boilers sometimes even reach higher efficiencies at partial load operation.

75% 80% 85% 90%< 5555 - 100100 - 170170 - 340> 340< 8585 - 120120 - 170> 170< 100100 - 200200 - 340340 - 680> 680

pellet boilers solid wood boilers wood chip boilers nominal load partial loadefficiency based on GCV

load categor y (MBtu/h) Figure ES-10 average efficiencies based on GCV at nominal and partial heat load for the TOP 25% performing boilersES-6 Although modern solid wood boilers are able to modulate their operation load from 100 to 50%, the use of heat storage is strongly recommended in order to reach high efficiencies and keep emissions low by prevent ing short cycling. Even though pellet and wood chip boilers can modulate their operation load from 100 to 30%, some studies also recommend the integration of accumulator tanks in these heating systems in order to increase the annual efficiencies of the heating systems. In addition to improved performance, the design of heat storage systems also influences the need for maintenance and the durability of boilers. Due to their high availability, non-wood biomasses such as grasses and agriculture products are very attractive fuels. They may however have certain general physical and chemical properties that cause problems during combustion. In addition to the possible increase of NO X , HCl, SO 2 , and other emissions in comparison to wood biomass, higher ash contents combined with lower ash melting temperatures and corrosive effects negatively influence the failure rate and durability of the boilers.



## Summary
By making careful conversions of conventional methodology and units, the energy efficiency and emissions performance of the European heating systems can be more easily summarized in the context of the A merican nomenclature. After conversions, differences in evaluation duty-cycle and the emissions sampling and analysis protocols still exist in the regulatory test methods between the European Commission and the U.S. For example, the European Commission ev aluation duty cycles do not include operation for the very low burn rates (low heat demand rates) that U.S. evaluations typically require. The U.S. evaluati on duty cycles include these lo w burn rates because many U.S. designs do not always automatically minimize or e liminate idle mode s that have poor combustion characteristics. There is considerable intere st in the U.S. in this opportunity for much improved performance. Also, the U.S. sampling and analysis typically include condensable particulate matter, which by and large is organic. Such testing is not required in European tests because the high-efficiency designs combust virtually all of the organic precursors to condensable aerosol particles. Instead, the European test measures any residual organic gases in the exhaust stream. Thus one must be careful in comparing results and recognize that not all results are directly comparable. In the case of the Top 25% performing wood boilers in the size range of 120,000 - 170,000 Btu, converting all of the organic gases to particulate matter would result in an increase of approximately 4% of the mass or an output based emission rate of 0.068 lb/mmBtu. Even considering the differences described above, it is clear that by using improved staged combustion design, fuels with lower water content; only 22.5% for wood chips and 14.5% for solid (cord) wood, requirements for minimum thermal efficiency, and sophisticated controls that optimize combustion and minimize or eliminate idle modes, the top 25% performing commercially available European technologies greatly exceed performance requirements of not only the current classes (1, 2, and 3) of boilers but also the proposed classes (4 and 5) for thermal efficiency and emissions. Technology-forcing policies, regulations, and Eco-labeling efforts have clearly resulted in greatly improved technology now available in Europ e, which is expanding into the American wood heating market as well.1-1 

# 1 Introduction

Austria is a leading country in biomass combustion technology due to its long tradition of using biomass for heating purposes as well as the high environmental awareness of its population. Approximately 30 years ago, the first efforts were started towards improving combustion technology for biomass appliances. At this time, the first measurements of efficiencies and CO emissions from boilers were performed by national authorities and a competition was arranged amongst Austrian producers of biomass boilers in order to encourage technology development. Figure 1- shows the technological improvement of boilers for solid (cord) wood, wood chips and pel l ets (starting in 1998) through test data from FJ-BLT. Over the last 30 years, the average efficiencies of biomass boilers have increased from approximately55% to more than 90% based on the NCV (net calorific value) and the average COemissions have decreased from 15,000 to less than 50 mg/m3.

Figure 1-1 Small scale wood combustion systems: Efficiencies and CO emissions measured at the test bench through certification tests since 1980 - data according (FJ-BLT 2005), compilation in (Voglauer 2005) In the European Union, efficiency requirem ents and emission limits (CO, OGC and dust) for solid fuel boilers are regulated by one standard: EN 303-5. In order to include the differing technology levels within the EU, different classes are defined for emission limits and efficiency requirements. In the new revisio n, which is currently under discussion, more stringent efficiency and emission performances will be introduced in order to raise the overall performance of biomass appliances in Europe. All European Union memb er states are allowed to introduce additional and more stringent requirements than those given in the European standards for combustion appliances. For example, this is done in Austria, Germany and the Scandinavian Countries. In addition to legal requirements, environmental labels with very high requirments for efficiency and emissions are also introduced by some countries. These eco-labels encourage the population to purchase high performing biomass appliances by giving additional financial incentives.1-2 This report provides a description of:

• combustion principles of modern biomass heating systems and commonly employed designs;

• combustion emission and reduction strategies;

• European test methods for various appliances;

• European regulations for biomass heating systems;

• a survey of current technology performance for commercially available heating systems;

• a summary of the best performing units based on thermal efficiency and CO emissions;

• emission control technology;

• fuel requirements;

• heat storage; and

• heating systems for non-woody biomass fuels. A key aspect of this study is that it describes the European methodology for determining thermal efficiency using the net calorific value (lower heating value) of the wood fuel and how this is converted to the gross calorific value (high heating value) used to determine thermal efficiencies by the U.S. heating in dustry. Throughout this report thermal efficiency values are converted to the American convention using gross calorific value. The emissions for “dust” or Total Suspended Particulates are converted to pounds per million British thermal unit (lb/MMBtu), the common unit used in the United States. Other emissions are normalized to values at standard conditions at 12% O 2 levels in the flue gas. By making careful conversions of conventional methodology and units, the energy efficiency and emissions performance of the European heating systems can be more easily summarized in the context of the A merican nomenclature. After conversions, differences in evaluation duty-cycle and the emissions sampling and analysis protocols still exist in the regulatory test methods between the European Commission and the U.S. For example, the European Commission ev aluation duty cycles do not include operation for the very low burn rates (low heat demand rates) that U.S. evaluations typically require. The U.S. evaluati on duty cycles include these lo w burn rates because many U.S. designs do not always automatically minimize or e liminate idle mode s that have poor combustion characteristics. There is considerable intere st in the U.S. in this opportunity for much improved performance. Also, the U.S. sampling and analysis typically include condensable particulate matter which by and large is organic. Such testing is not required in European tests because the high-efficiency designs combust virtually all of the organic precursors to condensable aerosol particles. Thus one must be very careful in comparing results and recognize that not all results are directly comparable.1-3 

## 1.1 Calorific Value and Efficiency

1.1.1 Chemical composition

Biomass is an inhomogeneous raw material. Properties and therefore the composition of biomass influence its combustion behavior. A complete analysis of the biomass fuel would be time extensive and very expensive. For the characterization of the biomass with regard to its combustion behavior, proximate analysis is common, which entails determining the content of water, ash and volatiles in the fuel, as well as, the heating value of the fuel(see afterwards). Biomass fuel can be divided into combustible and incombustible substances (Figure 1-). Incombustible components include water and substances which are converted to ash during combustion.

Figure 1-2 classification of biomass fuel with regard to its combustion behaviour (Marutzky, Seeger 1999) Combustible substances can be divided into volatiles and charcoal (fixed carbon). Volatiles equal the fraction of biomass, which is transferred to gaseous state when the biomass is heated up. The amount of volatile matter in biomass fuels is higher than in coals and usually varies between 76 and 86 wt.% (d.b.). As a result of this high amount of volatiles, the major part of a biomass fuel is vaporized before homogeneous gas phase combustion reactions take place; the remaining char then undergoes heterogeneous combustion reactions. Therefore, the amount of volatile matter strongly influences the thermal decomposition and combustion behavior of solid fuels. Figure 1-3 shows the mass and energy ratio of ash, volatile matter and charcoal from biomass. From ash forming substances, no energy is gained. Charcoal contributes to the energy quantity in a high degree. 

### BIOMASS - FUEL

incombustible

substances combustible substances

volatiles charcoal water ash1-4 energy ratio minerals = ash

charcoal 1 %

83 %

16 % 67 %

33 % volatiles

mass ratio Figure 1-3 Mass and energy ratio of ash, charcoal and volatiles from biomass (Ebert, 1998)

Looking at the elemental composition of biomass, main elements, macro and micro nutrients and others can be identified (Figur e 1-). Figure 1- shows the average elemental compositions of plants.

Carbon (C) Hydrogen (H) Oxygen (O) MAIN ELEMENTSMACRO NUTRIENTMICRO NUTRIENT

OTHERS Sulphur (S) Nitrogen (N) Potassium (K) Phosphor (P) Magnesium (Mg) Calcium (Ca) Ferrite * (Fe) Boron (B) Ferrite * (Fe) Manganese (Mn) Molybdenum (Mo) Copper (Cu) Chlorine (Cl) Zink (Zn) Selenium (Se)

Cobalt (Co) Silicon (Si) Sodium (Na), Aluminium (Al)

micro elements and heavy metals Carbon (C) Hydrogen (H) Oxygen (O) MAIN ELEMENTSMACRO NUTRIENTMICRO NUTRIENT

OTHERS Sulphur (S) Nitrogen (N) Potassium (K) Phosphor (P) Magnesium (Mg) Calcium (Ca) Ferrite * (Fe) Boron (B) Ferrite * (Fe) Manganese (Mn) Molybdenum (Mo) Copper (Cu) Chlorine (Cl) Zink (Zn) Selenium (Se)

Cobalt (Co) Silicon (Si) Sodium (Na), Aluminium (Al)

micro elements and heavy metals

Figure 1-4 concentration and function of elements in biomass (Kaltschmitt, Hartmann 2001) composition of plants (wt% d.b.)

Figure 1-5 average elemental composition of plants (Kaltschmitt, Hartmann 2001)
While the macro and micro nutrients are important for the growth of the plant, they can influence the combustion process negatively. Table 1-1 shows the guiding values and guiding ranges for elements in biomass fuels and biomass ashes for unproblematic thermal utilisation.1-5 Table 1-1 Guiding values and guiding ranges for elements in biomass fuels and biomass ashes for unproblematic thermal utilisation

Element Guiding concentration in fuel

(wt% d.b.) Limiting parameter Outside guiding concentration ranges, problems can occur for

N < 0.6 NO x emissions Straw, cereals, grass < 2.5 Waste wood, fibre boards

Cl < 0.1 Corrosion Straw, cereals, grass < 0.1 HCl emissions Straw, cereals, grass < 0.3 PCDD/F emissions Straw, cereals, grass

S < 0.1 Corrosion Straw, cereals, grass < 0.2 SOx emissions Grass, hay Ca 15 - 35 Ash-melting point Straw, cereals, grass

K < 7.0 Ash-melting point, depositions, corrosion Straw, cereals, grass -- Aerosol formation Straw, cereals, grass

Zn < 0.08 Ash recycling Bark, wood chips, sawdust -- Particulate emissions Bark, wood chips, sawdust

Cd < 0.0005 Ash recycling Bark, wood chips, sawdust -- Particulate emissions Bark, wood chips, sawdust Guiding values for ashes related to the biomass fuel ashes according to ISO 1171-1981 at 1022 °F



### 1.1.2 Calorific Value

1.1.2.1 Measurement and conversion

Gross calorific value (upper heating value) The wet based GCV is determined by measurement in bomb calorimeter:

• Temperature of fuel before combustion and of combustion products: 77 °F. Before and after combustion all water (water in fuel and formed water by H) is liquid

• complete oxidation of C and S in the fuel (CO 2 and SO 2 )

• no oxidation of N in the fuel 

# ( )

m H GCV R b w 

### Δ

− =

. . F 1

GCV w.b. wet based gross calorific value Btu/lb enthalpy of reaction Btu
m fuel mass lb In order to calculate the dry based GCV, the moisture content w has to be considered: R H Δ1-6 

### w GCV GCV b w b d



### − ⋅ = 1 1

. . . . F 2

GCV w.b. wet based gross calorific value Btu/lb

GCV d.b. dry based gross calorific value Btu/lb
w moisture content in the fuel lb/lb

Net calorific value (lower heating value) In the NCV the water in the fuel and the formed water by H is gaseous after combustion, but still at a temperature of 77 °F (25 °C) . Therefore the difference between NCV and GCV is the evaporation heat of the water amount after combustion at 77 °F. In order to determine the dry based NCV from the dry based GCV, the evaporation heat of the hydrogen in the fuel has to be subtracted:

. . . . . . 

### 9 b d b d b d 

### h r GCV NCV

⋅ ⋅ − = F 3

NCV d.b. dry based net calorific value Btu/lb

GCV d.b. dry based gross calorific value Btu/lb r evaporation heat of water at 77 °F (= 1,050) Btu/lb

h d.b. dry based hydrogen in the fuel lb/lb
w moisture in the fuel lb/lb

For calculation of the wet based NCV, the mass and the evaporation heat of the moisture in the fuel has to be considered:



### w r w NCV NCV b d b w 

### ⋅ − − ⋅ = ) 1 (

. . . . F 4

NCV w.b. wet based net calorific value Btu/lb

NCV d.b. dry based net calorific value Btu/lb r evaporation heat of water at 77 °F (= 1,050) Btu/lb h hydrogen in the fuel lb/lb
w moisture in the fuel lb/lb

Conversion from dry based GCV to wet based NCV If direct conversion of dry based GCV to wet based NCV is wished, combination of F 3 and F 4 result in:



### w r w h r GCV NCV b d b d b w 

### ⋅ − − ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ − = ) 1 ( ) 9 (

. . . . . . F 5

NCV w.b. wet based net calorific value Btu/lb

NCV d.b. dry based net calorific value Btu/lb r evaporation heat of water at 77 °F (= 1,050) Btu/lb

h d.b. dry based hydrogen in the fuel lb/lb
w moisture in the fuel lb/lb

In Figure 1-6 the relationship of the net calorific value as well as the gross calorific value and the dry based water content is given. Additionally typical water contents for pellets, log wood (seasoned wood) and fresh wood are drawn in.1-7 Figure 1-6 relationship of net and gross calorific value and water content

1.1.2.2 Formula from Boie

The heating value can only be determined exactly by measurement. If measurement is not possible or only estimation is requested, the experimentally developed formula from Boie can be used to approximate the heating value of the biomass. Although this formula considers the nitrogen in the fuel, which is hardly oxidized, it still furnishes reasonable results for bio-fuels:



### w n s o h c NC V

b w b w b w b w b w b w



### ⋅ − ⋅ + ⋅ + ⋅ − ⋅ + ⋅ ≈ 050 , 1 709 , 2 515 , 4 644 , 4 377 , 40 964 , 14

. . . . . . . . . . . . F 6

NCV w.b. wet based net calorific value Btu/lb

c w.b. wet based carbon in the fuel lb/lb

h w.b. wet based hydrogen in the fuel lb/lb

o w.b. wet based oxygen in the fuel lb/lb

s w.b. wet based sulfur in the fuel lb/lb

n w.b. wet based nitrogen in the fuel lb/lb
w water content lb/lb 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% water content w in % w.b. GCV BTU/lb
NCV BTU/lbseasoned woodCalorific Value in BTU/lb(w.b.)wood pelletsfresh wood1-8 

### 1.1.3 Conversion factors

For the conversion of efficiencies and emissions, it is necessary to assume the elemental composition, the calorific value and the water content of the consider ed biofuels. In Table 1-2 the considered values are shown. The elemental composition and the gross calorific value of the biofuels correspond to the standard values that are used for emission calculations by BE2020+, Branch Wieselburg. Th e average water contents of the fuels from all input data (w NCV ) are assumed to be equal to the average water content of each fuel from the FJ-BLT 1 test reports. The water contents of the biofuels for the calculation of the efficiencies based on the GCV (w GCV ) were provided by NYSERDA. Table 1-2 assumed elemental composition, gross calorific value and water content for conversion

GCV 1) (d.b.) c 1,2) h 1,2) a 1,2) w NCV 3) w GCV 4) NCV 3) (w.b.) GCV 4) (w.b.) Btu/lb % (d.b.) % Btu/lb pellets 8 600 50.70 6.23 0.20 7.5 5 7 300 8 200 solid wood 14.5 20 6 700 6 900 wood chips 22.5 40 6 000 5 200

1) standard values for emission calculation of BE2020+, Wieselburg 2) c: carbon in the fuel, h: hydrogen in the fuel, a: ash in the fuel 3) averaged from FJ-BLT test reports 4) given from NYSERDA

In the test reports that were used for this study, the efficiencies were based on the lower heating value (net calorific value NCV). These eff iciencies were achieved with test fuels having the assumed averaged water content of the test fuels as shown inTable 1-2. The efficiencies must however be based on the GCV, which is calculated with new water contents of the fuels given by NYSERDA (see Table 1-2). In order to convert the efficiencies based on the GCV values with the new water contents provided in the test reports by NYSERDA, the correlation between the water content of the fuel and the efficiency have to be considered. In order to calculate the conversion factors, the excess air ratio of the combustion conditions must be determined, whereby it is assumed to equal the average excess air ratio found in the data available from FJ-BLT:

• pellets:  = 1.50

• solid wood:  = 1.42

• wood chips:  = 1.43 Figure 1-7 shows the efficiencies that were reached for water contents of 0, 22.5 and 40% at an excess air ratio of 1.43 (these values correspond to wood chips). In Figure 1-7 only losses by heat in the flue gas are considered. Losses by radiation, un-burnt gases in

1 FJ-BLT is the test house for wood boilers in Wieseburg1-9 the flue gas or un-burnt material in the ash are not considered. Theses losses are however small in comparison to the flue gas losses.

65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 flue gas temperature in °F water content 40.00% water content 22.50% water content 0.00%efficiency based on GCV

Figure 1-7 correlation between the efficiency and corresponding flue gas temperature for different water contents of the fuel at an excess air ratio of 1.43 (only losses by heat in the flue gas considered) The effect of water content on efficiency is illustrated in the following example. An efficiency of 85% with a fuel water content of 22.5% will be reduced to 80% if the fuel water content is increased to 40%, assuming that the flue gas temperature stays constant (about 220 °F).
In order to convert the efficiencies based on the NCV and the average water contents of the test fuels to the efficiencies based on the GCV and the water contents provided by NYSERDA, the graphs for each fuel corresponding to Figure 1-8 were determined. Equation F 7 shows the approximated equation that was used for conversion and in Table 1-3 the factors for eqution F 7 are given.



###      

⋅ −

⋅ − = 2 1 2 1 

### X f X Y Y BLT

NYSERDA NCV CV GCV 

### η η F 7

 GCV,NYSERDA efficiency based on GCV and water contents from NYSERDA -

 NCVBLT efficiency based on NCV and averaged water contents of the test fuel -1-10 Table 1-3 factors for conversion from efficiency determined on basis of the NCV and averaged water contents of the test fuels to efficiency based on GCV and water content specified by NYSERDA

fuel X 1 (-) X 2 (-) Y 1 (-) Y 2 (-) f CV (-) pellets 9.32·10 -1 5.37·10 -4 9.36·10 -1 5.35·10 -4 9.22·10 -1

solid wood 9.21·10 -1 5.21·10 -4 9.12·10 -1 5.28·10 -4 9.11·10 -1
wood chips 9.07·10 -1 5.35·10 -4 8.62·10 -1 5.70·10 -4 8.96·10 -1

Figure 1-8 exhibits the resulting conversion functions.

60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%

75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% efficiency based on NCV and averaged water contents of the fuels solid wood (14.5% -> 20%) pellets (7.5% -> 5%) wood chips (22.5% -> 40%)efficiency based on GCV and watercontent from NYSERDA

Figure 1-8 conversion function for the conversio n of the efficiencies based on the NCV and average water contents of test fuel to efficiencies based on the GCV and average water contents provided by NYSERDA When converting from NCV with a 7.5% water content pellet to the American convention of GCV with a pellet having 5% water content, a loss of approximately 5% is observed. This loss is mostly due to water formed from the hydrogen in the wood fuel, but also reflects a slight, partly offsetti ng, efficiency gain that resu lts from lower fuel moisture content. In the case of changing from a wood chip fuel with 22.5% water content to one with 40% water content, not only is the 5% loss of energy from the fuel hydrogen conversion to water accounted for but the loss in energy efficiency of an additional 10% due to the loss of energy required to heat the water in the fuel is also apparent.2-1 

# 2 Biomass combustion technology

2.1 Overview – combustion principles

2.1.1 Staged combustion

Combustion technology for biomass appliances is based on staged combustion in order to enable maximum burnout rates. Figure 2-1 illustrates the stages of biomass combustion that take place in the primary and secondary combustion zones.

combustion of biomass

reaction in firebed reaction in comb. chamber

gas combustion drying

solid combustion

devolatilization combustion air

primary combustion zone secondary combustion zone combustion air combustion of biomass

reaction in firebed reaction in comb. chamber

gas combustion drying

solid combustion

devolatilization combustion air

primary combustion zone secondary combustion zone combustion air

Figure 2-1 primary and secondary combustion zone in biomass combustion In the primary combustion zone, the bio-fuel is first dried from the heat within the combustion chamber followed by devolatilization, whereby the volatile substances are set free from the solid fuel and ascend to the secondary combustion zone. Finally, the remaining solid charcoal is burnt in the firebed. Primary air is needed for devolatilization and solid combustion. In the secondary combustion zone, the volatile gases from devolatilization and gases from solid combustion are burnt with secondary air. In order to achieve low emissions, the reaction in the secondary combustion zone must be as complete as possible.



### 2.1.2 Manual stoking

Manually stoked furnaces can burn logs (from 10 in up to 40 in in length) as well as briquettes. Some log wood furnaces also work with coarse wood chips. There are three common, basic classifications, which are determined by the airflow of the primary air: top burning, through burning or under burning furnace. These designs are illustrated in Figure 2-2. Numerous combinations and modifications of these three principles are available.2-2 Figure 2-2 Classification of log wood combustion principles (FNR I 2007) In through-burning systems, the primary air enters the combustion chamber through a grate. The wood logs are then ignited at the bottom of the batch, thus heating the entire stack and commencing the burning. This combus tion system is suitable for stoves frequently fed with small batches of log wood. For log wood boilers, this combustion principle is no longer a state-of-the-art technology. In top burning systems, the primary air enters the combustion zone sideways. The stack is ignited at the top or in the middle and as such, the combustion reactions are slower than those in through-burning systems. The combustion process is nevertheless discontinuous. This combustion system is suitable for small or medium batches of log wood. Both combustion systems, through and top-burning, are usually operated with natural draught, meaning that no auxiliary ventilation devices are needed. Under-burning systems are the latest development in log wood combustion technologies. This principle is a state-of-the-art technology for log wood boilers. The fuel is ignited at the bottom and the combustion gases are drawn downwards or sideways, resulting in a relatively continuous combustion process. The continuous combustion process and separation of the primary and secondary combustion zones result in very low emissions; a fan is however necessary to ensure proper operation. This fan is usually placed at the flue gas exit of the furnace.



### 2.1.3 Automated stoking

Automatically stoking furnaces can be divided into furnaces with fixed bed combustion, fluidised bed combustion and dust combustion. The basic principles of these three technologies are shown in Figure 2-3 (Marutzky, Seeger 1999).2-3 Fuel Ash

Air

Fixed bed furnace

(grate furnace) Fuel

Ash

Air

bubbling fluidised

bed furnace circulating fluidised bed furnace Air Air Fuel

Fuel

dust firing
Figure 2-3 Diagram of principle combustion technologies for biomass (Marutzky, Seeger 1999) Fixed-bed combustion systems include grate furnaces and underfeed stokers. Primary air passes through a fixed bed, in which drying, gasification, and charcoal combustion takes place. The combustible gases produced are burnt after secondary air addition has taken place, usually in a combustion zo ne separated from the fuel bed. Within a fluidised bed furnace, biomass fuel is burnt in a self-mixing suspension of gas and solid-bed material into which combustion air enters from below. The type of combustion can be distinguished depending on the fluidisation velocity, bubbling fluidised bed and circulating fluidised bed Dust combustion is suitable for fuels available as small particles (average diameter smaller than 0.1 in). For this type of combustion, a mixture of fuel and primary combustion air is injected into the combustion chamber, whereby the combustion takes place while the fuel is in suspension. The gas burnout is achieved after the addition of secondary air. For small scale appliances, fixed bed combustion technology is used in medium to large scale appliances, inclusive for all technologies.

Small scale appliances - pellets Existing combustion technologies for wood chips have been adopted for pellet combustion, and a new principle has been developed. The development of small-scale pellet burners has taken place to a great exten t in Sweden and Austria. Pellet burners are divided according to the feed direction of the pellets into three main types: top feed, underfeed and horizontal feed (Alakamgas, Paju 2002).2- 4 Figure 2-4: Classification of pellet combustion principles (Alakamgas, Paju 2002) In underfeed burners (underfeed stoker or underfeed retort burners), the fuel is fed into the bottom of the combustion chamber or combustion retort. These burners are best suited for fuels with low ash content (wood pellets, wood chips). They are built for a nominal power between 35 MBtu/h and 8 MMBtu/h or greater. In horizontal feed burners, the combustion ch amber is either fitted with a grate or a pusher plate. The fuel is introduced horizontally into the combustion chamber. During combustion, the fuel is moved or pushed horiz ontally from the feeding zone to the other side of the pusher plate or the grate. Whil e the fuel is drying, gasification and solid combustion take place; following this the remaining ash drops into an ash container. Horizontal feed burners can burn wood chips and pellets and are built for nominal heat flows from 50 MBtu/h to more than 50 MMBtu/h. Purpose-built horizontal feed systems (with moving grate, and water cooling) are fitted for the use of bark, straw or grain. Top feed burners have been specifically developed for pellet combustion in small-scale units. The pellets fall through a shaft onto the fire bed consisting of either a grate or a retort. The separation of the feeding system and the fire bed ensures the effective protection against back-burn into the fu el storage. The proper distance between the combustion retort and the feeding system prevents early ignition of pellets in the feeding system (Obernberger, Thek 2002). The ash is removed manually or mechanically by a dumping grate. This feeding system allows ve ry accurate feeding of pellets according to the current heat demand and is thus often used in furnaces with very small nominal heat flows. Pellet burner systems are always operated with a forced draught. The fan can be placed at the combustion air inlet or at the flue gas exit of the furnace.2-5 

## 2.2 Small scale combustion systems

Common small scale combustion systems for woody biomass are listed in Table 2-1 and are categorized in two groups: Room heaters and boilers. Small scale combustion systems are used in the residential and commercial sectors as well as in district heating systems. Table 2-1 Types and features of small-scale wood combustions systems, modified from (FNR I 2007)

type nominal heat load in MBtu/h combustion principle feature

ROOM HEATERS fireplaces 0 - 15 through- / top burning inappropriate for permanent heating

pellet stoves 10 – 35 top feed automatically operated, regulated fuel and combustion air input (fan), with or without hot water wood stoves 10 – 40 through- / top burning fired from living room no water installations

Masonry heaters 5 – 60 through- / top burning diverse heat storing/release characteristics , with or without hot water, combined technologies with pellets

BOILERS

pellet boilers 10 top feed / hori z ontally feed / underfeed burner fully automated operation, induced draught

solid wood boilers 35 through/ under burning up to 40 in log wood length, natural or induced draught, buffer accumulator is needed wood chip boilers 35 through burning / horizontally feed / underfeed burner fully automated operation possible, induced draught, buffer accumulator advantageous



### 2.2.1 Room heaters

Room heaters are intended to heat a space directly, unlike central heating furnaces or boilers, which supply heat to the house through a system of ducts or pipes. Varying concepts for space heaters have been developed and are still in use. Common space heaters are:

• Open and closed fireplaces

• Log wood stoves

• Masonry heaters (Heat storing [tiled] stoves)

• Pellet stoves2-6 2.2.1.1 Fireplaces

Conventional fireplaces have a long history in home heating. They are built from masonry materials such as brick, block and stone. More recently, factory-built models are constructed mainly of steel. C onventional open fireplaces (Fig ure 2-5, left) do not heat a home efficiently and their use for permanent heating is thus not recommended. In many settlement areas and especially urban areas, the use of open fireplaces is even forbidden. Factory-built closed fireplaces combine the beauty of an open fire with modern wood stove features, such as controlled and staged combustion air supply, baffle plates, properly dimensioned combustion chambers and fireclay lining. Burnout rate and efficiency clearly exceed those of open fireplaces. Many closed fireplaces provide heat by direct flame radiation and by convection (Figure 2-5, right).

Figure 2-5 Open fireplace (left) and closed fireplace with convection casing (right)(Kachelofenbauerinnung 2007) Fireplaces will not be considered in this study because they are not an appropriate technology for heating purposes.

2.2.1.2 Pellet stoves

Pellet stoves are suitable for continuous operation; their minimum heat output is usually 30 % of the nominal heat flow. Underfeeding and top feeding are the most common combustion technologies for pellet stoves. Figure 2-6 shows the principle of a pellet stove with a top feed burner. The pellets are conveyed by the fuel screw into the shaft fr om where they fall into the combustion retort. The pellets are usually ignited automatically with a glow-plug. The supply of primary and secondary combustion air is controlled by a low-noise fan. External air supply is also possible for some pellet stoves, which is important for houses with controlled ventilation. The storage compartment is placed in the rear of the stove and can hold up to 110 lb of pellets.2-7 Figure 2-6 Functional principle of a pellet stove with top feed burner (Calimax 2007)

In the latest technological developments, the quality of combustion is regulated by a carbon monoxide sensor which ensures optimal combustion air supply at all times. Excess air ratio sensors are used less often for the control of ventilators in pellet stoves as they are quite expensive. They are howeve r frequently used for control in boiler furnaces.

2.2.1.3 Pellet stoves with hot water production

The heat output of pellet stoves can usually be varied from 30 to 100 %. This enables pellet stoves to produce exactly the heat and, with integrated heat exchangers, also the hot water required. In these pellet stoves up to 80 % of the heat produced can be stored in the water (FNR I 2007). Figure 2-7 shows an example of a pellet stove with integrated hot water production. The combination of a pellet stove and solar hot water production allows the complete heat and hot water demand of a (low-energy) house to be covered without the need of an additional boiler.2-8 Figure 2-7 Pellet stove with integrated hot water production (Calimax 2007)

2.2.1.4 Wood stoves

Figure 2-8 Functional principle of a log wood stove (Westfeuer 2005) Figure 2-9 Example of a log wood stove (Heinz Aberle 2007)

In contrast to fireplaces, log wood stoves are floor mounted (free-standing) in the living room. In general, they are built of cast iron and designed for logs with a length of 10 and 15 in. Wide variations in design, such as doors with or without viewing glass or casings oftiles or soapstone are available. Log Wood stoves are usually based on the throughburning principle. Conventional log wood stoves are equipped with up to three doors; the upper door serves for loading the logs, the middle door is used for manual grate cleaning and the third for ash removal. Combustion air supply can be regulated manually by dampers or push handles. In simple designs, there is no separation of primary and2-9 secondary combustion air. Figure 2-8 and Figure 2-9 show the functional principle as well as an example of modern log wood stoves based on the through-burning principle. Log wood stoves are still sold without test certification.

2.2.1.5 Masonry heaters

Two different basic types of masonry heaters, the fully handcrafted model and the prefabricated model, can be distinguished. The traditional type of masonry heater, the tiled base stove, is a fully handcrafted heating device. With the exception of the fire door and possibly some parts of the combustion chamber, it is completely built with ceramic materials such as chamotte, soapstone, clay and/or tiles. Due to its large heat storing mass, it is a slow reacting heating system; Figure 2-10 shows the functional principle of tiled base stoves and Figure 2-11 shows a design example of a tiled base stove. This stove is fed from another room (mostly from the anteroom).

Figure 2-10 Functional principle of a tiled base stove (Kachelofenbauerinnung 2007) Figure 2-11 Example of a tiled base stove (Kachelofenverband 2007)

The second type of masonry heaters consists of a prefabricated combustion chamber; the combustion gas channel (heat exchangers) can be built by hand or be prefabricated as well. A hot-air tiled stove has only a small heat storage mass. This type of stove consists of a prefabricated heater and optionally, a steel or cast-iron heat exchanger. Most of the heat is transferred by convection. Hot-air tiled stoves can react quickly to changing heat demands, but are not designed for long-la sting heat transfer. Depending on their dimensions, hot-air tiled stoves have similar heating characteristics as conventional wood stoves with convection casings. Combined tiled stoves are a combination of tiled base stoves and hot-air tiled stoves, consisting of a prefabricated heater and a ceramic heat storage unit (Figure 2-12 and Figure 2-13).2-10 Figure 2-12 Functional principle of a combined tiled stove (Kachelofenbauerinnung 2007) Figure 2-13 Example of a combined tiled stove (Kachelofenverband 2007)

Masonry heaters are based on the top and through-burning combustion principles. Combustion air is supplied in stages as primary and secondary combustion air.

Combined masonry heaters Different technologies have been developed for the combustion of pellets in tiled stoves over the past few years. Prefabricated heaters enable the optional combustion of log wood and pellets or have an integrated boiler function; Figure 2-14 shows a prefabricated heater for pellet combustion in a combined tiled stove. No auxiliary devices such as a fan or motor are needed for operation; Figure 2-15 shows a fully automated prefabricated heater with an underfeed pellets burner. Both prefabricated heaters can burn log wood as well.

Figure 2-14 Prefabricated heater Pellets Power (Wienerberger Ofenkachel 2007) Figure 2-15 Prefabricated heater Pellet module (Brunner 2007)2-11 

### 2.2.2 Boilers

In contrast to space heaters, boilers are intended to produce hot water for heating remote rooms. Usually, they are placed in spe cial heating rooms in the cellar, in the garage or even in heating containers outside the house. Modern boilers achieve efficiencies beyond 80 % (based on the upper heating value).

2.2.2.1 Pellet boilers

Pellet boilers operate fully automatically with top feed, underfeed and horizontal feed burners. Manufacturers have typically specialized in a certain technology. Devices exclusively designed for wood pellets are typically used for a heat output range from 25 MBtu/h. For higher heat flows, wood chip furnaces are usually used, which are often approved for wood pellets as well. Figure 2-16 and Figure 2-17 show two different top feed boilers for wood pellets. This combustion principle allows for accurate feeding and is suitable for small heat demands as well as on/off-operation modes. In order to ensureproper operation, the grate must be automatically cleaned. Slagging can occur if lowquality pellets are used (Regionalenergie Steiermark 2005).

Figure 2-16 Top feed boiler (Evotherm 2010) Figure 2-17 Top feed boiler (Windhager 2005)
Underfeed boilers are used for small to large heat flows. Underfeed boilers are less sensitive to low-quality pellets than top feed burners (Regionalenergie Steiermark 2005). An example of an underfeed boiler is shown in Figure 2-18. A horizontal feed boiler is demonstrated in Figure 2-19.2-12 Figure 2-18 Underfeed boiler ( Guntamatic 2007 ) Figure 2-19 Horizontal feed boiler ( Hargassner 2005 )

Flue gas condensing With proper flue gas condensing technology the moisture can be removed from the flue gas to further reduce the exhaust gas temperature, thus achieve higher efficiencies

. Figure 2-20 shows the functional principle of the first condensing boiler for wood pellets available on the European market. Its efficiency of over 100 % is of course only due to the chosen definition for the det ermination of the efficiency, which is based on the net calorific value of the used fuel. The measure d total dust emissions are very low, most likely due to the effect of the flue gas condensation.

Figure 2-20 Functional principle of a condensing boiler for wood pellets (Oekofen 2007)

2.2.2.2 Solid wood boilers

Log wood boilers with natural draught based on the through-burning combustion principle were a state-of-the-art technology in the 1970s. Modern log wood boilers are based on the under-burning combustion principle and induced draught. Usually a fan, which is placed at the flue gas exit of the boiler, is used to suck primary and secondary2-13 combustion air into the corresponding combustion zones. The wood storage compartment may be filled during combustion without the risk of combustion gases leaving the boiler. The high degree of turbulence needed for the mixing of the fuel gas and the combustion air is ensured by the proper design of the combustion air inlet zone and the nozzles; Figure 2-21 and Figure 2-22 show two different log wood boilers with induced draught airflow and flue gas exits on the side and at the top of the boiler. Log wood boilers are usually designed for a heat output range from 50 to 135 MBtu/h. There are some specialty companies that make systems up to 3 MMBtu/h such as the Lopper company.

Figure 2-21 Under-burning boiler with induced draught, flue gas exit sideways(Buderus 2005) Figure 2-22 Under-burning boiler with induced draught, vertical flue gas exit (Froeling 2005)

2.2.2.3 Wood chip boilers

For wood chip boilers, underfeed burners and ho rizontal feed burners with or without a grate are fairly common in various designs. Wood chip boilers are therefore used in a wide nominal power capacity range from 50 MBtu/h up to over 70 MMBtu/h. Concerning small scale systems, the advantages of wood chip boilers over log wood boilers include automatic operation and low emissions due to continuous combustion. On the other hand, the process of producing, storing and, if necessary, drying wood chips requires more investment in machinery and storage space than is the case for log wood. In comparison to pellets, wood chips are less expensive and can be produced on site. Wood chip boilers are often approved for wood pellets as well; specially designed pellet boilers, however can not be fired with wood chips. Figure 2-23 shows an example of an underfeed burner for wood chips and pellets. The principle of a horizontal stoker burner is shown in Figure 2-24.2-1 4 Figure 2-23 Underfeed burner for wood chips and pellets (KWB 2007) Figure 2-24 Horizontal feed burner for wood chips, pellets and grain (BAXI 2007)

2.2.2.4 Combined boiler technologies

Special boilers have been developed to combine the comfortable combustion system for wood pellets with the combustion system for log wood. In some boilers manual switching is necessary, while others are fully automated. Figure 2-25 shows a combined boiler with a fully automatic switch. When heat is demanded, the pellet burner is started automatically. Any log wood fed into the boiler will be ignited by the pellet flame. As soon as the log wood is ignited, the pellet burner stops and the log wood stack is burnt (under-burning principle). If there is no log wood in the fuel storage compartment, the pellet burner will continue combustion and the log wood compartment is used as secondary combustion zone for pellet combustion.

Figure 2-25 Combined boiler technology for pellet and log wood combustion (left: log wood mode, right: pellet mode) (sht 2007)2-15 

## 2.3 Medium to large scale combustion

In Table 2-2 the characteristics of common medium to large combustion technologies for woody biomass are listed. Table 2-2 Types and characteristics of medium to large combustions systems suitable for woody biomass (FNR II 2007)

Combustion technology Stoking Fuel Nominal power Moisture content (% w.b.)

Underfeed stoker Mechanic Pellets and wood chips (ash content 1%) 35 MBtu/h – 9 MMBtu/h 5-40

Moving grate Mechanic All wood fuels (ash content up to 50%) 510 MBtu/h – 170 MMBtu/h 5-60

Bubbling fluidised bed combustion Mechanic Particle size <3.6 in 20 M M Btu /

h – 120 MMBtu/h 5-60 Circulating fluidised bed combustion Mechanic Particle size <1.5 in 50 M M Btu /

h850 MMBtu/h 5-60

Dust firing Pneumatic Particle size <0.20 in 1700 M Btu /

h170 MMBtu/h Usually <20



### 2.3.1 Fixed-bed combustion

2.3.1.1 Underfeed stokers

In addition to small scale combustion systems where underfeed stokers are a common technology (see 2.2.2.1 and 2.2.2.3), they are also an inexpensive and operationally safe technology for medium-scale systems up to 20 MMBtu/h. They are suitable for biomass fuels with low ash content (wood chips, sawdust, pellets) and small particle sizes (particle dimension up to 2.0 in). Ash-rich biomass fuels such as bark, straw and grain need more efficient ash removal systems. Moreover, sintered or melted ash particles covering the upper surface of the fuel bed can cause problems in underfeed stokers due to unstable combustion conditions when the fuel and the air are breaking through the ash-covered surface. An advantage of unde rfeed stokers is their good partial-load behaviour and their simple load control. Load changes can be achieved more easily and quickly than in grate combustion plants because the fuel supply can be controlled more easily (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).2-16 Figure 2-26 Combustion chamber of an underfeed stoker furnace (BINDER 2007)

2.3.1.2 Grate furnaces

There are different grate furnace technologies available: fixed grates, travelling grates, moving grates, rotating grates, vibrating grates etc. All of these technologies have specific advantages and disadvantages depending on the fuel properties; as such careful selection and planning is necessary. Based on the flow directions of fuel and the flue gas, there are different systems for grate combustion plants (Figure 2-27):

• counter-current flow (flame in the opposite direction as the fuel)

• co-current flow (flame in the same direction as the fuel)

• cross-flow (flue gas removal in the middle of the furnace)

Counter-current combustion is most suitable for fuels with low heating values (wet bark, wood chips or sawdust). Co-current combustion is applied for dry fuels such as waste wood or straw, or in systems where pre-heated primary air is used. Cross-flow systems are a combination of co-current and counter-current units and are also especially applied in combustion plants with vertical secondary combustion chambers (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).

Cross-current Co-current Counter-current

Figure 2-27 Classification of grate combustion technologies: co-current, cross-current and counter-current (Nussbaumer 1995)

Moving grate systems Moving grate furnaces usually have an inclined grate consisting of fixed and moveable rows of grate bars (see Figure 2-27 and Figure 2-28). They are made of heat-resistant steel alloys and are equipped with small channels in their side-walls for primary air2-17 supply. By alternating horizontal forward and backward movements of the moveable sections, the fuel is transported along the grate, whereby un-burnt and burnt fuel particles are mixed and the surface of the fuel bed is steadily renewed. The fuel is evenly distributed over the grate surface (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).

Figure 2-28 Combustion chamber of a moving grate furnace (Polytechnik 2007 )

In moving grate furnaces a wide variety of biofuels can be burnt. Air-cooled moving grate furnaces use primary air for cooling the grate and are suitable for wet bark, sawdust andwood chips. For dry biofuels or biofuels with low ash-sintering temperatures, watercooled moving grate systems are recommended (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).

Travelling grate Travelling grate furnaces are built of grate bars forming an endless band (like a moving staircase) moving through the combustion chamber. Fuel is supplied at one end of the combustion chamber onto the grate by screw conveyors for example, or it can be distributed over the grate by spreader-stokers injecting the fuel into the combustion chamber (see Figure 2-29). The fuel bed itself does not move, but is transported through the combustion chamber by the grate, contrar y to moving grate furnaces where the fuel bed is moved over the grate. The advantages of travelling grate systems are that they provide uniform combustion conditions and low dust emissions due to the stable and almost unmoving bed of embers. Furthermore, the maintenance or replacement of grate bars is easy to handle. In comparison to moving grate furnaces, however, the fact that the bed of embers is not stoked results in a longer burn-out time (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).2-18 Figure 2-29 Diagram of a travelling grate furnace fed by spreader-stokers (Detroit Stoker Company 1998)



### 2.3.2 Fluidised bed combustion

Fluidised bed (FB) combustion systems have been applied since 1960 for the combustion of municipal and industrial wastes. Regarding technological applications, bubbling fluidised beds (BFB) and circulating fluidised beds (CFB) have to be distinguished. Due to the good mixing achieved, FB combustion plants can provide flexibly with different fuel mixtures but are limited in terms of fuel particle size and impurities contained in the fuel. Therefore, an appropriate fuel pre-treatment system covering particle size reduction and separation of metals is necessary for fail-safe operation. Usually a particle size less than 1.6 in is recommended for CFB units and less than 3.1 in for BFB units. Moreover, partial load operation of FB combustion plants is limited due to the need of bed fluidisation. The low excess air quantities necessary increase combustion efficiency and reduce theflue gas volume flow. This makes FB combustion plants especially interesting for largescale applications. One disadvantage of FB combustion plants is posed by the high dust loads carried along with the flue gas which make efficient dust precipitators and boiler cleaning systems necessary (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).

2.3.2.1 Bubbling fluidised bed combustion (BFB)

In BFB furnaces (see Figure 2-30) a bed material is located in the bottom part of the furnace. The primary air is supplied over a nozzle distributor plate and fluidises the bed. The bed material is usually silica sand. Th e advantage of BFB furnaces is their flexibility concerning particle size and moisture content of the biomass fuels. Furthermore, it is also possible to use mixtures of different kinds of biomass or to co-fire them with other fuels. A large disadvantage of BFB furnaces is the difficulties they have at partial load operation, a problem that is solved in modern furnaces by splitting or staging the bed. BFB furnaces are typically used for nominal outputs of more than 17-34 MMBtu/h (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).2-19 bed partitioning section A-A 1 3 2 1 A A

Fuel

Fluidised bed Flue gas ash

tertiary air

primary air

bed 1 secundary air bed 2,3 2 3

Figure 2-30 Diagram of a BFB furnace (Hein, Schmitz 1995)

2.3.2.2 Circulating fluidised bed (CFB) combustion

By increasing the fluidising velocity to 16 to 33 ft/s and using smaller sand particles (0.008 in to 0.02 in diameter), a CFB system is achieved. The sand particles will be carried with the flue gas, separated in a hot cyclone or a U-beam separator, and fed back into the combustion chamber (see Figure 2-31). The higher turbulence in CFB furnaces leads to a better heat transfer and a very homogeneous temperature distribution in the bed. The disadvantages of CFB furnaces are their larger size and therefore higher price, the even greater dust load in the flue gas leavi ng the sand particle separator than in BFB systems, the higher loss of bed material in the ash, and the small fuel particle size required (between 0.004 and 1.6 in in diameter). This often causes higher investments in fuel pre-treatment. Moreover, their operation at part ial load is problematic. CFB furnaces are usually applied in a power range of more than 100 MMBtu/h (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).2-20 to baghouse Economizer Generator banks Primary superheaters Secondary superheater Tertiary superheater Gas flow

790-890°C 870°C Cyclone

Furnace

Air

Fuel 910°C

Figure 2-31 Diagram of a CFB furnace (NREL 1996)



### 2.3.3 Dust combustion

Fuel quality in dust combustion systems has to be quite constant. Fuels such as sawdust and fine shavings are pneumatically injected into the furnace. The transportation air is used as primary air. Start-up of the furnace is achieved by an auxiliary burner. Due to the explosion-like gasification of the fine and small biomass particles, the fuel feeding needs to be controlled very carefully and forms a key technological unit within the overall system. Fuel gasification and charcoal combustion take place at the same time because of the small particle size. Therefore, quick load changes and an efficient load control can be achieved. Figure 2-32 shows a muffle dust furnace in combination with a water tube steam boiler. This technology is available for thermal capacity between 6.8 and 27 MMBtu/h (Loo, Koppejan, 2002).2-21 1...primary air supply, 2...fuel feed, 3...gasification and partial combustion, 4...flue gas recirculation, 5...ash disposal, 6...secondary air supply, 7...tertiary air supply, 8...water tube boiler.

Figure 2-32 Diagram of a dust combustion plant (muffle furnace) in combination with a water-tube steam boiler (Marutzky, Seeger 1999)3-1 

# 3 Emissions

A short summary of biomass combustion emissions is provided in the following section. Additionally, measurement and reduction methods are summarized. With regard to the reduction methods, primary and secondary measures have to be distinguished: While primary measures are implemented in the combustion process and/or design of the combustion chamber, secondary measures are implemented after combustion process has ended.
More detailed information on fo rmation mechanisms, impacts on health and the environment, and measurement an d reduction methods can be found in Nussbaumer 1989, Kaltschmitt, Ha rtmann 2001, Marutzky, Seeger 1999 or Loo, Koppejan, 2002.



## 3.1 Conversion factors

Emissions are usually given in a concentration related to a certain O 2 -concentration in the flue gas at normal conditions 2 (mg/m3 at 13% O 2 or ppm at 13% O 2 ); this relation of the emissions to certain O 2 -concentrations enables comparability of data. For biomass appliances, the normal O 2 -concentrations range from 10 to 13 %. Sometimes emissions are related to the fuel input (mg/MJ). Since th e measurement of the exact energy input is impractical, especially in medium to large scale appliances, this measurement method is limited to small scale appliances. The most recent emission limits from the European Commission are usually given in mg/m3 based on 10 % oxygen in the dry flue gas; older regulations refer to 13 % oxygen in the dry flue gas. In this report, gaseous emissions will be given in mg/m3 at XX % O 2 , which always means that emissions are related to the dry volume in m3 at norma l conditions (Nm3) at a certai n oxygen level in the flue gas (XX % O 2 ). According to NYSERDA’s specifications, emissions are to be based on an oxygen content of 12 %

. In Table 3-1 the factors for the conversion of the O 2 -based emissions in mg/Nm3 for various oxygen levels are shown.
Table 3-1 conversion factors for O 2 -based emissions in mg/m3

mg/m3 at 10% O2 1 0 9

. 0 1 8

. 0 2 7

. 0 mg/m3 at 11% O2 1.1 1 0.9 0.8 mg/m3 at 12% O2 2

. 1 1

. 1 1 8

. 0 mg/m3 at 13% O2 1.375 1.25 1.125 1 mg/m3 at 10% O2 mg/m3 at 11% O2 mg/m3 at 12% O2 mg/m3 at 13% O2 read the table from the first column to the last row: Emissions in mg/m3 at 10%O2 · 0 9

. 0 = Emissions in mg/m3 at 11%O2

The European Commission also provides emission limits for dust in mg/m3 at a certain O 2 level. The factors for the conversion from mg/m3 at 12% O 2 to mg/kg fuel and lb/MMBtu are shown in Table 3-2. For the conversion from mg/m 3 at a certain O 2 level to mg/kg fuel

2 pressure of 1 atm and temperature of 32 °F3-2 and lb/MMBtu, the elemental composition and the calorific value of the considered fuels have to be assumed. These assumptions are given in Table 1-2 on page 1-8. Table 3-2 conversion factors for the conversion of dust emissions from mg/m3 to mg/kg fuel and lb/MMBtu

fuel 2 % 12 3 / /

O at fuel
m mg kg

mg
2 % 12 3 / /

O at m mg mmBTU

lb

pellets 10.08 1.23·10 -3 solid wood 9.31 1.35·10 -3 wood chips 8.44 1.64·10 -3


## 3.2 Carbon Monoxide (CO)

3.2.1 General

Carbon monoxide emissions can be regarded as the indicator of the combustion quality. Conversion of fuel carbon to CO 2 takes place through several elementary steps, and through several different reaction paths. CO is the most important final derivative. It is oxidized to CO 2 if oxygen is available.

The rate at which CO is oxidised to CO 2 depends primarily on temperature. In addition, sufficient residence time is important to achieve low CO emission levels, mainly because CO is generally a later in termediate than hydrocarbons. Furthermore, enough oxygen must be available and mixed with the fuel for the combustion process. CO emissions are caused by incomplete combustion, which is mainly a result of:

• inadequate mixing of the combustion air and the fuel in the combustion chamber, producing local fuel-rich combustion zones;

• an overall lack of available oxygen;

• combustion temperatures too low;

• residence times too short; These variables are all linked together through the reaction rate expressions for the elementary combustion reactions. However, in cases in which sufficient oxygen is available, temperature is the most important variable due to its exponential influence on the reaction rates. An optimisation of these variables will in general contribute to reduced levels of all emissions from incomplete combustion.

Figure 3-1 shows the CO emission level as a function of excess air ratio for different biomass combustion applications. For each system an optimum excess air ratio exists: higher excess air ratios will result in a decreased combustion temperature while lower excess air ratios will result in inadequate mixing conditions.3-3 CO [mg/m 3 ]

0

excess air ratio 10 100 1000 10,000 100,000

12345 a

b

d c a) simple, manually charged wood boiler; b) downdraught wood log boiler; c) automatic furnace with combustion technology as of 1990; d) automatic furnace with enhanced combustion technology as of 1995

Figure 3-1 CO- emissions - CO vs. excess air ratio (Nussbaumer 1989)



### 3.2.2 Measurement

CO emissions are measured directly after the fl ue exit of the appliance in an insulated pipe and results are given in ppm per dry flue volume (m3) at normal conditions. In order to reference the emissions to an oxygen content of 10, 12 or 13 %, the O 2 and/or the CO 2 concentration have to be measured as well.



### 3.2.3 Reduction

In order to keep CO and correspondingly Organic bound carbon/organic gas (OGC) emissions low, optimal conditions for a high burnout rate of CO must be ensured. These conditions are often summarized as the 3T-rule (Time, Temperature, Turbulence) for combustion quality. In addition, the correct amount of oxygen (air) must participate in the combustion.

Residence TIME of fuel and oxygen in the combustion zone Figure 3-2 shows the correlation between CO burnout and residence time in an ideal stirring reactor. The higher the combustion temperature and the oxygen content, the lower residence times are necessary to reach high CO burnout rate. The residence time is a function of the combustion chamber volume and combustion gas flow. The combustion chamber has to be designed to guarantee high residence times also at high load operation and to avoid undesirable conditions (e.g. dead zones, insufficient mixing, etc.)

High TEMPERATURES of the gases in the combustion zone The reaction rate of CO to CO 2 depends primarily on temperature if the mixture of fuel and oxygen as well as a certain residence time are given. The temperature of the combustion zone is influenced by the materi als used for the combustion chamber. If ceramics are used to line the combustion ch amber, temperatures will be higher than if the combustion chamber was built of steel (must be cooled with water).3- 4 In addition, the air fuel ratio impacts the combustion temperature, as shown in Figure 3-3. The higher the air fuel ratio, th e lower combustion temperatures will be.

Figure 3-2 CO-rest as function of residence time, combustion temperature and oxygen-concentration in an ideal stirrin g reactor (Leuckel, Roemer 1979)

400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 Excess air ratioadiabatic comb. temp. [°C] 20 wt% w.b.
30 wt% w.b.
40 wt% w.b.
50 wt% w.b. fuel moisture content

400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000

0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3 3.2 Excess air ratioadiabatic comb. temp. [°C] 20 wt% w.b.
30 wt% w.b.
40 wt% w.b.
50 wt% w.b. fuel moisture content

Figure 3-3 Relationship between the adiabatic combustion temperature and the excess air (air fuel) ratio (Nussbaumer 1989)

High TURBULENCE in combustion zone The mixing quality of fuel and oxygen is desc ribed by the turbulence in the combustion zone. The turbulence is primarily influenced by the flow velocity of the combustion air. With increasing flow velocities, the mixing of fuel and air becomes increasingly ideal. This again results in lower amounts of air needed for the combustion and thus higher combustion temperatures (see Figure 3-3). Leuckel, Römer, 1979 

### 0,1 1,0 10,0 100,0

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4 1,6 

## residence time in [s]remainingCO in [%] 1300 °F, 18%O2
1300 °F, 2%O2
1200 °F, 18%O2
1200 °F, 2%O2 1300 °F, 18%O2
1300 °F, 2%O2
1200 °F, 18%O2
1200 °F, 2%O23-5 

## 3.3 Total Organic Bound Carbon/Organic Gaseous Substances (OGC)

3.3.1 General

OGC emissions from biomass appliances are directly linked to high CO emissions. InFigure 3-4 the measurement results of the correlation between hydrocarbon and COemissions for wood appliances are shown. If CO-emissions are low, hydrocarbon emissions will be 1/100 to 1/10 of the CO-emissions.

Figure 3-4 Correlation of hydrocarbon and CO-emissions in wood appliances (Nussbaumer 1989)



### 3.3.2 Measurement

OGC emissions are measured directly after the flue exit of the appliance in an insulated pipe and results are given in ppm. In order to reference the emissions to an oxygen content of 10, 12 or 13 %, the O 2 and/or the CO 2 concentration have to be measured as well.



### 3.3.3 Reduction

If CO emissions are low, OGC emissions will also be low for biomass combustion processes. Therefore, no separate reduction controls for OGC emissions are necessary for biomass combustion. 

## 3.4 Dust · Particulate Matter (PM) · Totals Suspended Particulate Matter (TSP) a) Wood stove , b) solid wood boiler with underburning technolo g y, c) Wood chips boile r with horizontal feed 1 10 100 1.000 10.000

10 100 1.000 10.000 100.000 Carbon monoxide in [mg/m n 3]Hydrocarbons a)

b)

c)

a) Wood stove , b) solid wood boiler with underburning technolo g y, c) Wood chips boile r with horizontal feed 1 10 100 1.000 10.000

10 100 1,000 10,000 100,000 Carbon monoxide in [mg/m n 3] a)

b)

c)[mg/mn3]3-6 

### 3.4.1 General

Particulates formed during biomass combustion can be divided into bottom ashes and fly ashes. The fly ash fraction typically consists of a coarse and a fine mode. While the coarse mode (particles larger than some μm) is simply due to the ash entrainment from the fuel bed, the formation pathways of the fine mode (so-called aerosols, with a particle diameter <1 μm) are much more complex.



### Bottom ash K, Na, S, Cl, easily volatile heavy metals released from the fuel to the gas phase Condensation on coarse fly ash particles

Coarse fly ash particles entrained from the fuel bed Gas phase reactions Cooling phase

Nucleation Condensation

Figure 3-5 Ash and aerosol formation processes during biomass combustion The basic mechanisms concerning aerosol formation in combustion processes are generally well known from former research work (Friedlander 1977). Volatile ash forming compounds specific to biomass combustion such as K, Na, S and Cl as well as easily volatile heavy metals (Zn and Cd), are released from the fuel into the gas phase and subsequently undergo gas phase reactions. As soon as the vapour pressure of a compound exceeds the saturation pressure, which can happen either due to a high formation ratio of this compound or by cooling of the flue gas, particle formation by nucleation or condensation of these vapours on existing surfaces takes place. Nucleation and condensation are always competing processes, and if enough surface for condensation is available, nucleation can par tly or even totally be suppressed. Otherwise, very small (some nm) aerosol particles are formed. As soon as these particles are formed, they start to coagulate with other aerosols or with coarse fly ashes. Figure 3-5 gives an overview of the different ash and aerosol formation processes (for more details see Brunner et al 2004). Next to the formation path of the fly ash fraction by low volatile minerals, heavy metalsand salt, aerosols can also be formed due to incomplete combustion. In this case unburnt carbon, fine wood particles, charcoal, soot, tar, etc. are emitted as dust. Therefore complete combustion (low CO emissions) is necessary to keep dust emissions as low as possible. In Figure 3-6 the chemical compostions of dust samples from an appliance that was operated under optimal conditions (low CO emissions) and from a wood stove that was operated under poor conditions (high CO emissions) are shown.3-7 Automatic appliance, optimum operation conditions CO < 50 ppm Wood stove, poor operation conditions

CO > 10 000 ppm

Figure 3-6 Chemical composition of dust samples from different biomass appliances and operation conditions (Klippel 2007) While the unburned fraction of an automatic appliance under optimum operation conditions is about 2% by weight, the unburned fraction of the wood stove that was operated under poor conditions is about 98% by weight. Considering that the amount of salts is approximately equal for the automatically and the manually stoked appliances, overall dust emissions from the wood stoves will be a multiple higher than those of the automatic system. Definition and characteristics of coarse fly ashes and aerosols:

• Coarse fly ashes:

o ashes entrained from the fuel bed

o particle sizes < 100 μm

o mainly consist of refractory species such as Ca, Mg, Si as well as smaller amounts of K, Na, Al3-8 • Aerosols:

o colloidal solid (dust) or fluid (fog) particulate matter in gases

o formed from condensed ash vapours released from the fuel to the gas phase during combustion

o particle sizes between 1 nm and 1 μm

o mainly consist of K, Na, S, Cl, Zn and Pb

• Fly ashes = coarse fly ashes + aerosols

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

0.01 0.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 1,000.00 xm [μm ae.d.] wood chips [mg/Nm3] bark [mg/Nm3] waste wood [mg/Nm3]

aerodynamic diameter d ae [  m]m/lg(dae) [mg/Nm3]

Figure 3-7 Particle size distributions of fly ashes in the flue gas at boiler outlet in dry flue gas at 13% O 2 (Brunner et al 2004)

Figure 3-8 SEM images of coarse fly-ash (left) and aerosol particles (right) Description: Samples from wood combustion in a grate furnace; biomass fuel: wood (beech). Equipment used: Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Brunner et al 2004)



### 3.4.2 Measurement

The dust content is determined discontinuously (usually over a period of 30 minutes) using a gravimetric or electrostatic method. Suitable test equipment is shown in Figure 3-9.3-9 1. removable sampling probe 2. union nut 3. seal 4. filtering bush 5. quartz wool 6. filter housing 7. union nut 8. clamping ring 9. flat filter support 10. flat filter 11. end case

Figure 3-9 Tubular filter device for dust measurement With this method the total coarse and the major fine dust fraction in the flue gas is measured. Filtration efficiencies of 99.5% for 0.3 	m and 99.9% for 0.6 	m respectively are required. In order to avoid the condensing of semi-volatiles, a minimum flue gas temperature of 270 °F is required. More information about measurement methods for dust can be found in VDI 2066, EN 13284-1 or Nussbaumer 2008.

Results are given in mg per dry flue volume (m3) at normal conditions. In order to reference the emissions to an oxygen content of 10, 12 or 13 %, the O 2 and/or the CO 2 concentration have to be measured as well.



### 3.4.3 Reduction

3.4.3.1 Primary measures
The study of the primary reduction of dust emissions is a fairly new field of research. Oser, Nussbaumer 2004 developed a low-particle concept for biomass appliances:

• operation at very low air-fuel ratio in the firebed (Excess air ratio in firebed: 0.2- 0.4)

• gas tightness of combustion and fuel stoking unit

• operation at low overall air-fuel ratio (excess air ratio 1.3-1.6)

• clear staging of secondary air and prevention of backflow of secondary air into the firebed.

• adequately large dimensioned combustion cha mber for a high firebed

• high burnout rate of OGC

• sufficiently high temperatures in primary combustion zone

3.4.3.2 Secondary measures

To reduce dust emissions, diverse technologies with different efficiencies and function principles were developed. Since costs for investment, operation and maintenance are, depending on the technology, quite high and limits are given to operating conditions, these technologies were primarily used in large and medium scale appliances. Due to3-10 strict dust emission limits in small scale appliances, dust control technologies were recently adopted for the utilization in small appliances as well. Table 3-3 gives an overview of particle sizes removed and efficiencies reached by medium to large scale dust control technologies. Table 3-3 summary of typical sizes of particles removed by various particle control technologies
Particle control technology Particle size (	m) Efficiency (%) Settling chambers > 50 < 50 Cyclones > 5 < 80 Multicyclones > 5 < 90 Electrostatic precipitator < 1 > 99 Baghouse filters < 1 > 99 Spray chambers > 10 < 80 Impingement scrubbers > 3 < 80 Cyclone spray chambers > 3 < 80 Venturi scrubbers > 0.5 < 99

3.4.3.2.1 Cyclones

Particle separation in a cyclone is based on the principle of gravity in combination with centrifugal forces. Gas and solid particles are exposed to centrifugal forces, whereby heavy particles experience higher centrifugal forces and therefore hit the wall and slide down into a container. The gas flow into the cyclone can be tangential (Figure 3-10) or axial . In the second case a fan is necessary to bring the gas into rotation. The separation efficiency of a cyclone can be improved by increasing the centrifugal force through reduction of the cyclone diameter. In order to prevent the loss of capacity, several cyclones can be used in parallel; this is called a multicyclone and is illustrated in Figure 3-11. There are however disadvantages of multicyclones due to design complexities that increase costs. They also require an increased pressure drop, and thus have a higher energy consumption. Cyclones represent a simple technology which are highly reliable and require little maintenance. The requirements regarding the flue gas quality are low. Cyclones are used at pressure levels from 0.01 to 100 atm and can withstand temperatures of up to 1650 °F. The efficiency from 80 – 90% is quite low and corresponds to dust loads of 0.150 to 0.075 lb/MMBtu when biomass is used. This technology is therefore quite often used as pre-precipitator.3-11 Figure 3-10 Tangential cyclone (Jirkowsky et Al, 2002) Figure 3-11 Axial multicyclone (Jirkowsky et Al, 2002)

3.4.3.2.2 Electrostatic precipitator

In an electrostatic filter, the particles are first electrically charged and then exposed to an electrical field whereby they are attracted to an electrode. Periodically, this electrode is cleaned through vibration, where the dust falls off the electrode into a collection unit. Efficiencies can be >99%. This operation principle is shown in Figure 3-12.

Figure 3-12 Operation principle of electrostatic precipitator (Jirkowsky et Al, 2002) Different variations of electrostatic precipitators are available:
The dry electrostatic precipitator works as illustrated in Figure 3-12. In order to collect the precipitated particles, discontinuous operating rappers are used.

In wet electrostatic precipitators, the flue gas is completely saturated before entering the precipitator. This saturation reduces the electrical charging of the particles and increases the efficiency. Condensing wet electro static precipitators are cooled by ambient air, which leads to the cooling of the flue gas and the condensation of water on the inner surface of the precipitator. The condensed water flows down the electrode and cleans it at the same time.3-12 3.4.3.2.3 Baghouse filters

Baghouse filters consist of a filter or cloth tightly woven from special fibres and hung in a closed construction through which flue gas passes. The separation efficiency of bag filters is quite high, even with high flue gas flow rates and high particle content. The first layer of particles actually improves the filtration e fficiency. However, as more particles settle on the cloth, the pressure drop increases. The cloth is thus periodically cleaned by vibration or pressurized air (Figure 3-13).

Figure 3-13 Pulse jet baghouse filter (Jirkowsky et Al, 2002)

The operating temperature range is limited to approximately 480 °F; there is a significant risk of fire if this temperature is exceeded or wh en un-burnt carbon is present in the fly ash. In order to limit the amount of particles settling on the filter and to reduce the chance of fire through sparks, a cyclone can be used. When the operating temperatures are too low, tars present in the flue gas may condense and clog the cloth. In addition, the moisture in the flue gas is limited to a maximum of 20 %. Baghouse filters reach efficiencies of greater than 99% and therefore reduce the emissions of wood appliances below 0.010 lb/MMBtu.

3.4.3.2.4 Scrubbers

In scrubbers, particles are scrubbed out from the flue gas by water droplets of various sizes depending on the type of scrubber used. The particles are removed by the collision and interception between droplets and particles. Upon impact, the particles are wetted and effectively removed by the water droplet. The more droplets formed, the more efficient the unit will be. The droplets must therefore be small. Smaller diameter spray nozzles will produce smaller droplets, but will also result in higher pressure drops, consuming more energy. Since efficiency increases as the droplet size decreases, the efficiency also increases with increasing pressure drop. Several types of scrubbers exist. In a countercurrent scrubber for example, the flue gas is introduced at the bottom side of the unit and flows upward against the current with respect to the settling of the atomised liquid droplets. In a cross-flow scrubber , the flue gas flows perpendicular with respect to the settling of the atomised spray water droplets. Although two sets of sprays atomise the water in horizontal directions, the settling of the resulting droplets is still downward, perpendicular to the direction of the flue gas. A cyclone spray chamber (Figure 3-14) is a combination of an ordinary spray and a cyclone. A venturi scrubber (Figure 3-14) works with a high pressure nozzle in which the flue gas and the liquid are atomised.3-13 Figure 3-14 Venturi scrubber (left), cyclone spray chamber (right) (Corbitt 1999) Scrubbers reach efficiencies of up to 99%. They are usually only used if acid components in the flue gas (HCl, SO 2 ) have to be precipitated as well (FNR 2005). This is necessary for contaminated biomass or for non wood biomass with high chlorine and/or sulphur contents. For medium and large scale wood biomasses appliances this technology is not relevant, but some scrubber systems – always combined with flue gas condensation – have recently been developed for small scale appliances.

3.4.3.2.5 Flue gas condensation
The primary aim of flue gas condensation is the heat recovery from fuels with a high water content. An additional effect of flue gas condensation is that the dust load is precipitated by the condensing water and dust loads can be reduced down to 0.060 lb/MMBtu (FNR 2005). In medium to large scale appliances a cyclone should be used before flue gas condensation. In order to enable flue gas condensation, a return temperature of about 85 °F should be possible. 

## 3.5 Nitroxen Oxides (NO X 

## )

NO X emissions from biomass combustion applications are mainly a result of complete oxidation of nitrogen in the fuel. Additional NO X may be formed from nitrogen in the air given certain conditions. However, these reaction mechanisms are not considered to be of significant importance in most biomass combustion applications. The main nitric oxide emitted is NO, which is converted to NO 2 in the atmosphere. In Figure 3-15 the diverse reaction paths of the nitrogen in the fuel are exhibited. It shows that most of the nitrogen in the fuel is converted to N 2 , and some N is bound in the ash, but there is also a fraction of nitrogen in the fuel that is converted to NO and N 2 O.3-1 4 N in ash N 2 O

NO

N 2 biomass volatile HCN

coke

N NH i i=0,1,2,3 NO

N 2 N 2 O

O, OH O, OH

NO CH i („NO-Recycle“) NCO NH

NH i CO, CH i C, ash H OH pyrolysis and gasification intermediate products oxidation products in flue gas

Figure 3-15 Formation paths of biomass fuel nitrogen

Besides the fuel NO X mechanism described in Figure 3-15, two further mechanisms – the thermal NO X mechanism and the prompt NO X mechanism - result in increased NO X emissions. These two NO X mechanisms gain relevance at combustion temperatures above 2300 °F (1300 °C), as shown in Figure 3-16. Since these temperatures are hardly ever reached during biomass combustion, the thermal and prompt NO X mechanisms are not considered to be re levant for biomass combustion. Figure 3-16 also shows that typical NO X -emissions for wood combustion are in the range of approximately 90 to 250 mg/m3. For herbaceous biofuels, the typical NO X emissions are between 250 and 550 mg/m3, because the fuel bound nitrogen is generally higher in herbaceous fuels than in wood.

As Figure 3-16 shows, the nitrogen content of the fuel and the NO X emissions are directly related for biomass combustion, meaning that if the nitrogen content of the fuel is high, the NO X emissions will be high as well. This relationship is, however, not linear. Conversion rate of fuel bound nitrogen in the fuel to NO X decreases with increasing nitrogen content.3-15 1600 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

800 1200 1400 Prompt- NO x

1600 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

800 1200 1400 Prompt- NO x time, O 2 Thermal NO x for t=0.5 s, O 2 = 11 vol %

Fuel NO x , wood Fuel NO x , herbacious biofuels Fuel NO x , UF-Chip board

temperature [°C] NO

x as NO 2 at 11% O 2 [mg/m 3 ] Typical biomass combustion Thermal NO x and prompt NO x

Figure 3-16 NO x -emissions - dependence on the fuel an d the furnace temperature (Nussbaumer 1997)

Figure 3-17 Correlation of the nitrogen content of the fuel and NO X emissions (Wopienka et al. 2007)



### 3.5.1 Measurement

NO X emissions equal the sum of NO and NO 2 emissions. They are measured directly after the flue exit of the appliance in an insulated pipe, and results are given in ppm. In order to refer the emissions to an oxygen content of 10, 12 or 13 %, the O 2 and/or the CO 2 concentration have to be measured as well.3-16 

### 3.5.2 Reduction

3.5.2.1 Primary measures

To reduce NO X emissions by primary measures, three different concepts are available.

Air staging Primary and secondary combustion air is injected in clearly separated zones or combustion chambers. Between these zones the NO is reduced in the reduction zone, where an excess air ratio of 0.7 – 0.8 and temperatures from 2000 to 2200 oF are required. With this technology, a NO X reduction in the range of 30 – 60% can be reached. In Figure 3-18 the concept for air staging and flue gas recirculation is shown.

Flue gas recirculation The recirculation of flue gas is primarily used to reduce or control combustion temperatures and therefore the formation of thermal NO X . Thermal NO X is however not considered to be a relevant formation mechanism for biomass combustion (see chapter 0). Some reduction of fuel NO X is nevertheless achieve d by flue gas recirculation.

pyrolysis

 << 1 1650 F fuel

prim. air reduction zone  0.7 – 0.8 2000 – 2200 F oxidation zone  > 2 1500 F secondary air flue gas

ash ash heat exchanger

flue gas recirculation pyrolysis

 << 1 1650 F fuel

prim. air reduction zone  0.7 – 0.8 2000 – 2200 F oxidation zone  > 2 1500 F secondary air flue gas

ash ash heat exchanger

flue gas recirculation Figure 3-18 Concept of air staging and flue gas recirculation (adapted from Zuberbuehler 2002)

Fuel staging The concept of fuel staging aims at the same mechanisms as air staging by producing a reduction zone where NO is reduced. In the reduction zone, an excess air ratio from 0.6 – 0.8 is required. Approximately 70% of the fuel is stoked as primary fuel. As secondary fuel, biomass producer gas, shavings, and sawdust, are possible. With this reduction mechanism, a NO X reduction in the range of 50 to 70% can be achieved. In Figure 3-19 the concept for fuel staging is shown.

devolitalisation and oxidation

 > 1 primary

fuel

prim. air reduction zone  < 1 secondary fuel

oxidation zone  > 1 secondary air flue gas

ash ash devolitalisation and oxidation

 > 1 primary

fuel

prim. air reduction zone  < 1 secondary fuel

oxidation zone  > 1 secondary air flue gas

ash ash heat exchanger

Figure 3-19 Concept of fuel staging for primary NO X

reduction3-17 3.5.2.2 Secondary measures

To reduce NO X emissions by secondary measures, two different concepts were developed. Both concepts are applied in large scale appliances only because operation requirements and costs are too high for small and medium scale appliances. Figure 3-20 shows typical NO X emissions for biomasses and the NO X reduction potential of primary and secondary measures. For wood biomass combustion, secondary cleaning measures for NO X are usually not necessary because sufficient NO X reduction can be achieved by primary measures (FNR 2005).

Figure 3-20 NOx-emissions and reduction potential – overview ( Hasler et al. 2000 )
Explanations: NOx calculated as NO 2 and related to the dry flue gas at 11 vol.% O2
SNCR: selective non catalytic reduction In the SNCR process a reducing agent (ammonia or urea) is injected into the hot flue gas (in the afterburner chamber). The reducing agent reacts with the NO X to create elemental Nitrogen. The temperature range for optimal reaction is between 1550 and 1750 °F. If the temperature is too low, the reaction will be slow and if temperature is too high, side reactions will become more prominent and NO and N 2 O will be formed. To reach the maximum NO X removal, the reducing agents have to be added hyperstoichiometrically (1.5 for ammonia and 2 for urea). This leads to the emission of ammonia or urea in the flue gas. To keep these emissions low, th e reducing agents have to be metered exactly. A NO X reduction of 60 to 70% can be reached.

SCR: selective catalytic reduction The SCR process works at the same principle as the SNCR process, but catalysts are used to accelerate the reaction and to keep reaction temperatures lower. Platinum, tungsten,3-18 titanium or vanadium oxide based materials are used as catalysts. The optimum temperature level for ammonia is between 430 and 520 °F, and between 750 and 840 °F for urea. Due to the higher reaction rate, the reducing agents can be added nearly stoichiometricly thus resulting in lo w emissions of ammonia or urea. A NO X reduction of 80 – 95% can be achieved. A drawback of this technology is, however, the danger of the deactivation of the catalyst by alkaline compounds and heavy metals.4 -1 

# 4 European Test Methods

Table 4-1 gives an overview of the European standards for biomass (solid fuel) combustion technologies. These standards con sider requirements with respect to materials, design and construction, safety, performance, appliance instructions, marking, evaluation of conformity and type testing of the appliance. The performance requirements include a minimum thermal efficiency as well as limits for CO and optionally for OGC and dust. Table 4-1 European standards applied for biomass combustion technologies type standard comments B OILERS pellets, solid wood, wood chips, combined technologies EN 303-5 <1000 M Btu /

h Solid fuels max. water temperature: 100 °C, max. operating pressure: 6 bar boiler also providing direct heat EN 12809 < 170 M Btu /

h solid fuels (except for pellets) max. operating pressure: 2 bar R OOM
- HEATERS

cook stoves EN 12815 solid fuels (except for pellets) manual stoking hot water production also possible fireplace insets with or without doors EN 13229 solid fuels (except for pellets) manual stoking with or without combustion chamber doors, no fan hot water production also possible masonry heaters (insets)

wood stoves (continuous or intermitted operation) EN 13240 solid fuels (except for pellets) manual stoking with combustion chamber doors no fan hot water production also possible

pellet stoves EN 14785 < 170 M Btu /

h pellets only with or without fan closed fire doors only hot water production also possible

masonry heaters (handcrafted) EN 15250 solid fuels (pellets stoked manually) intermittend buring no fan no boiler function4 -2 

## 4.1 Residential heating systems

4.1.1 EN 303-5: Heating boilers for solid fuels, hand and automatically stoked

Full title: EN 303-5. Heating boilers for solid fuels, hand and automatically stoked, nominal heat output of up to 1025 MBtu - Terminology, requirements, testing and marking Prepared by/approved/amends: Prepared by CEN TC 57 Central heating boilers

. Approved on 12 November 1998 and published in April 1999. The standard is to be revised: A first proposal has been elaborated and the discussion at CEN-level started in spring 2008. Appliances: Boilers for hydronic heating systems up to nominal heat output of 1025 MBtu/h with manual and automatic stoking. Minimum heat loss of boilers has to stay within the requirements of the standard; otherwise the standard does not apply.
Fuels: Wood (logs, chops, briquettes, pellets, sawdust) and fossil fuels (coal, coke, anthracite).
Test Methods: Specifies test methods for heat output, efficiency and emissions (CO, OGC, dust); measurement methods for emissions are not defined. Availability: Sharing is restricted; English version purchasable: https://www.onnorm.at/shopV5/search/Details.action?showDetails=&dokkey=70316 Table 4-2 summary of EN 303-5 with regard to testing procedure

MANUALLY STOKED BOILERS AUTOMATICALLY STOKED BOILERS T EST DURATION AND NUMBER OF TESTS

o Before the tests may begin, the boiler

has to be brought to its normal working condition using a complete fuel load (up to the maximum filling height). Testing can sta rt when the necessary basic firebed is established.

o Test duration starts immediately after

placing the fuel on the basic firebed and ends with the refill.

o For the nominal and partial heat

loads , two nominal combustion periods and one combustion period are required respectively. o Before the tests may begin, the boiler has to be heated up to its normal working condition . Testing can start when the necessary basic firebed is established.

o For the nominal and partial heat

loads, test duration has to be at least 6 hours.4 -3 MANUALLY STOKED BOILERS AUTOMATICALLY STOKED BOILERS H EAT FLOW
- EFFICIENCY

o At nominal heat load the mean value of the flow temperature has to lie in the range

of 155 to 195 °F and the average temperature difference of flow and return has to lie in the range of 50 and 75 °F. In addition, the difference value between the ambient air temperature and the mean value of flow and return temperature has to be not less than 105 °F.

o At partial heat load the same conditions as for nominal heat load have to be

fulfilled, except for the requested te mperature difference of flow and return temperature.

o The efficiency is determined on the basis of the net calorific value and has to be

calculated with the direct method. The indirect calculation enables control of the measurement accuracy of the test rig and determination of the single losses. E MISSIONS

o At nominal heat load, the test period

covers two successive combustion periods (including refill), CO 2 or O 2 , CO and OGC (and NO X where appropriate) are measured during the complete test duration.

o At partial heat load the test period

covers one combustion period, CO 2 or O 2 , CO and OGC are measured.

o For the measurement of TSP at

nominal heat load, every combustion period is split into two equal time segments. Measurements start in each case at the beginning of a time segment, with the first measurement beginning immediately after the fuel is placed and the door closed. The suction time per filter is limited to 30 min. The average TSP content is determined from the 4 minimum half-hour values taken at half our intervals. o At nominal heat, CO 2 or O 2 , CO and OGC (and NO X where appropriate) are measured over the entire test duration.

o At partial heat load CO 2 or O 2 , CO and

OGC are measured over the entire test duration.

o For the measurement of TSP at

nominal heat load, the test period is divided into at minimum 4 equal time segments. The measurements begin in each case at the start of the segment, with the first measurement taken when the test begins. The suction time per filter is limited to 30 min. The average dust content is determined from the 4 minimum values taken at half hour intervals.

o For the calculation of the emissions from a combustion period, the measured data

sets are first averaged over the complete combustion period. Afterwards transformation to the desired units (mg/m3 at certain oxygen level or lb/MMBtu) is performed. The ambient air temperature during testing procedure has to be between 60 and 85 °F. Partial load is 50% of nominal heat load for manually stoked boilers and 30% of nominal heat load for automatically stoked boilers.4

- 4 

### 4.1.2 EN 12809: Residential independ ent boilers fired by solid fuel

Full title: EN 12809. Residential independent boilers fired by solid fuel – Nominal heat output up to 170 Btu/h – Requirements and test methods. Prepared by/approved/amends: Prepared by CEN TC 295 Residential solid fuel burning appliances , approved on 7 April 2001, amends: EN 12809:2001/A1:2004. Appliances: Hand and automatically fired, manual fuelled solid fuel appliances up to a nominal heat output of 170 MBtu/h for hydronic heating systems also providing direct heat at the place of installation.
Fuels: Solid mineral fuels, peat briquettes, natural or manufactured wood logs or multifuel in accordance with the operation instructions of the appliance.
Test Methods: Specifies test methods for total heat output, water heating output, space heating output, efficiency and emissions (CO, dust, OGC); measurement methods for dust and OGC are not defined. Availability: Sharing is restricted; English version purchasable: https://www.onnorm.at/shopV5/search/Details.action?showDetails=&dokkey=223590


### 4.1.3 EN 12815: Residential cookers fired by solid fuel

Full title: EN 12815. Residential cookers fired by solid fuel – Requirements and test methods Prepared by/approved/amends: Prepared by CEN TC 295 Residential solid fuel burning appliances , approved on 7 April 2001, amendments: EN 12815: 2001/A1: 2004. Appliances: Hand fired appliances, of which primary function is to cook and secondary function is direct heating. In case of connecting these appliances to a boiler, they also provide domestic hot water and/or central heating.
Fuels: Solid mineral fuels, peat briquettes, wood logs or multi-fuel in accordance with the operation instructions of the appliance.
Test Methods: Specifies test methods for total heat output, water heating output, space heating output, efficiency and emissions (CO, dust, OGC); measurement methods for dust and OGC are not defined. Availability: Sharing is restricted; preview is attached, English version purchasable: https://www.on-norm.at/shopV5/search/Details.a ction?showDetails=&dokkey=233243


### 4.1.4 EN 13229: Inset appliances including open fires fired by solid fuels

Full title: EN 13229. Inset appliances including open fires fired by solid fuels – Requirements and testing methods Prepared by/approved/amends: Prepared by CEN TC 295 Residential solid fuel burning appliances , approved on 7 April 2001, amendments: EN 13229: 2001/A1: 2003, EN 13229:2001/A2:2004.4 -5 Appliances: Freestanding or inset hand fired appliances that have functional modification or inset appliances for fireplaces: recessed and enclosed. Where connected to a boiler, also domestic hot water and/or central heating are provided.
Fuels: Solid mineral fuels, peat briquettes, wood logs or multi-fuel in accordance with the operation instructions of the appliance.
Test Methods: Specifies test methods for total heat output, water heating output, space heating output, efficiency and emissions (CO). Availability: Sharing is restricted; preview is attached, English version purchasable: https://www.on-norm.at/shopV5/search/Details.a ction?showDetails=&dokkey=233241

Table 4-3 shows the categorisations of appliances to EN 13229 and EN 13240. Table 4-3 Categorisation of appliances (EN 13229 versus EN 13240)
a) Freestanding or inset appliances without functional modification b) Freestanding or inset appliances with functional modification c) Inset appliances for fireplace recess and enclosure

1. Appliances operating with firedoors closed EN 13240 EN 13229 EN 13229

2. Appliances operating with firedoors closed or open EN 13240 EN 13229 EN 13229

3. Open fires without firedoors EN 13229 EN 13229 EN 13229
NOTE: Without functional modification means “modification of the surrounding of an appliance, which only changes the transmission of heat without affecting combustion.”4 -6 Table 4-4 summary of EN 13229 with regard to testing procedure

NOMINAL HEAT LOAD PARTIAL LOAD T EST DURATION

o Before tests may begin, the appliance

has to be operated until steady state is reached; at least one combustion period at nominal heat load is necessary before testing. Prefabricated heaters have to be operated before testing until the ceramic has completely dried (usually 10 hours or more).

o Testing starts immediately after refilling

the fuel onto the firebed and ends when all fuel except the ash is burnt.

o At least two tests in two different

combustion periods have to be carried out for nominal heat load

.
o Minimum combustion times with closed

doors for wood fuel:

o 1 hour for continuous operating stoves

o 0.75 hours for intermittent operating stoves

o 90 (+10/-20) min. for prefabricated heaters o Before test may begin, the appliance has to be operated at nominal heat load.

o Testing starts when operating conditions

are stable for not less than 15 min.

o For prefabricated heaters the test

duration ends when an ignitable firebed is left, for continuous operating stoves the test is finished when the mass of the firebed equals the mass of the firebed before start of the test.

o minimum combustion times with closed

doors for wood fuel:

o 3 hours for continuous operating stoves

o (50 ± 10)% of time at nominal load

H EAT FLOW

– EFFICIENCY

o Efficiency is calculated as the average of

the two test periods.

o If appliance is equipped with water

circulation, flow temperature during test must be 175 ± 40 oF and flow rate of water has to vary less than ± 5 %. o If appliance is equipped with water circulation, flow temperature must be below 185 oF and flow rate of water has to vary less then ± 5 %.

o Efficiency is calculated by the indirect method, considering flue gas loss from heat,

un-burnt matter and losses in the ash from un-burnt combustible matter. If appliance has water circulation, the hot water output is considered as well.

EMISSIONS

o CO 2 or O 2 and CO are measured during the complete test durations.

o For the calculation of the emissions from a combustion period, the measured data

sets are first averaged over the complete combustion period. Afterwards transformation to the desired units (mg/m3 at certain oxygen level or lb/MMBtu) is performed.


### 4.1.5 EN 13240: Room-heaters fired by solid fuel

Full title: EN 13240. Room-heaters fired by solid fuel – Requirements and test methods Prepared by/approved/amends: Prepared by CEN TC 295 Residential solid fuel burning appliances , approved on 7 April 2001, amendments: EN 13240: 2001/A2: 2004.4 -7 Appliances: Manually stoked appliances, which are operated with firedoors closed or open, providing direct space heat. Standard also applies to slow heat release appliances that are available as complete units or pre-fabricated parts designed to be built on site.
Fuels: Solid mineral fuels, peat briquettes, wood logs or multi-fuel in accordance with the operation instructions of the appliance.
Test Methods: Specifies test methods for total heat output, water heating output, space heating output, efficiency and emissions (CO, dust, OGC); measurement methods for dust and OGC are not defined. Availability: Sharing is restricted; preview is attached, English version purchasable: https://www.on-norm.at/shopV5/search/Details.a ction?showDetails=&dokkey=233239 Table 4-5 summary of EN 13240 with regard to testing procedure

NOMINAL HEAT LOAD PARTIAL LOAD T EST DURATION

o Before the test may begin, the

appliance has to be operated until steady state is reached; minimum combustion times and number of combustion periods for wood fuel are:

o 1.5 hours / 2 periods for continuous operating stoves

o 0.75 hours / 3 periods for intermitted operating stoves

o Testing starts immediate after refilling

the fuel onto the firebed and ends when all the fuel except the ash is burnt. o Before the test may begin, the appliance has to be operated at nominal heat load or the necessary firebed can be reached within one hour after ignition in the cold appliance.

o Testing starts when operating conditions

are stable for no less than 15 min.

o Testing is finished for continuous

operating stoves when the minimum combustion time of 10 hours (or longer time claimed by manufacturer) is reached. The firebed at the end of the test duration has to equal the mass of the firebed before start of the test. H EAT FLOW

– EFFICIENCY

o Efficiency is calculated as the average of

the two test periods.

o If appliance is equipped with water

circulation, flow temperature during test must be 175 ± 40 oF and flow rate of water has to vary less than ± 5 %. o If appliance is equipped with water circulation, flow temperature must be below 185 oF and flow rate of water has to vary less than ± 5 %.

o Efficiency is calculated by the indirect method, considering flue gas loss from heat

and un-burnt matter and losses in the ash from un-burnt combustible matter. If appliance has water circulation, the hot water output is considered as well.4 -8 EMISSIONS

o CO 2 or O 2 and CO are measured during the complete test durations.

o For the calculation of the emissions from a combustion period, the measured data

sets are first averaged over the complete combustion period. Afterwards transformation to the desired units (mg/m3 at certain oxygen level or lb/MMBtu) is performed.


### 4.1.6 EN 14785: Residential space heating appliances fired by wood pellets

Full title: EN 14785. Residential space heating appliances fired by wood pellets – Requirements and test methods Prepared by/approved/amends: Prepared by CEN TC 295 Residential solid fuel burning appliances , approved on 3 May 2006. Appliances: Residential space heaters fired by wood pellets. Appliances may be freestanding or inset appliances and provide direct heat. They can be operated by either a natural draught or fan-assisted combustion air. Where combined with a boiler, they also provide domestic hot water and/or central heating. These appliances are only operated with fire-doors closed.
Fuels: wood pellets
Test Methods: Specifies test methods for total/nominal/reduced heat output, water heating output, space heating output, efficiency and emissions (CO, dust, OGC); measurement methods for dust and OGC are not defined. Availability: Sharing is restricted, English version purchasable: https://www.onnorm.at/shopV5/search/Details.action?showDetails=&dokkey=2217854 -9 Table 4-6 summary of EN 14785 with regard to testing procedure

NOMINAL HEAT LOAD PARTIAL HEAT LOAD T EST DURATION

o Before the tests may begin, the

appliance has to be de-ashed and operated for at least 30 min. in its steady state (normal working conditions). Steady state is reached when flue temperature varies less than ± 40 °F.

o Test starts with the refill of the

appliance and has to last for at least 3 hours. If manufacturer claims a longer combustion period, the test has to be prolonged according to the manufacturer’s declaration.

o At least two tests in two different

combustion periods have to be carried out. o Before the tests may begin, the appliance has to be operated at nominal heat load. After de-ashing, the appliance has to be operated at partial load for at least one hour in steady state. Refill of appliance is possible before start of test.

o Test duration has to last at least 6

hours.

o No partial heat load tests are carried

out, if the appliance works in the on/off – mode only.

o One test is required.

H EAT FLOW
- EFFICIENCY

o Efficiency is calculated as the average of

the two test periods.

o If appliance is equipped with water

circulation, flow temperature during test must be 175 ± 40 °F and flow rate of water has to vary less than ± 5 %. o If appliance is equipped with water circulation, flow temperature must be below 185 °F and flow rate of water has to vary less than ± 5 %.

o Efficiency is calculated by the indirect method, considering flue gas loss from heat

and un-burnt matter and losses in the ash from un-burnt combustible matter. If appliance has water circulation, the hot water output is considered as well. E MISSIONS

o CO 2 or O 2 and CO are measured during the complete test durations.

o For the calculation of the emissions from a combustion period, the measured data

sets are first averaged over the complete combustion period. Afterwards transformation to the desired units (mg/m3 at certain oxygen level or lb/MMBtu) is performed.



### 4.1.7 EN 15250: Slow heat release appliances fired by solid fuel

Full title: EN 15250. Slow heat release appliances fired by solid fuel – Requirements and test methods Prepared by/approved/amends: Prepared by CEN TC 295 Residential solid fuel burning appliances , approved on 13 January 2007. Appliances: Manually stoked, intermittent burning, slow heat release appliances with thermal storage capacity. Appliances are always built on site, either completely hand crafted or assembled with pre-fabricated parts. This standard specifies the minimum time4 -10 period within which the maximum diff erential surface temperature may be reduced to half of its original value.
Fuels: Solid mineral fuels, peat briquettes, wood logs or multi-fuel in accordance with the operation instructions of the appliance. Manually stoked wood pellets can also be burnt either on the existing grate on in special insets.
Test Methods: Specifies test methods for total heat output, efficiency and emissions (CO, dust, OGC); measurement methods for dust and OGC are not defined Availability: Sharing is restricted, preview is attached, English version purchasable: https://www.on-norm.at/shopV5/search/Details.a ction?showDetails=&dokkey=278524 Table 4-7 summary of EN 15250 with regard to testing procedure

NOMINAL HEAT LOAD PARTIAL HEAT LOAD T EST DURATION

o The test is to be started cold without a

pre-test period, whereby ignition is to be performed either according to the manufacturer’s instructions or using kindling of mass of 500g or 10% of the fuel load, whichever is greater. Any bottom air entry is to be open during ignition.

o The adding of further batch charges

should not exceed 3 hours.

o Any batch charges shall not be less than

20% of the total fuel loading.

o The test is over once 25% of the mean

maximum differential surface temperature of the appliance’s external surfaces has been reached.

o One test is required.

o A Temperature Safety Test is also

required. o The test is to be started cold without a pre-test period, whereby ignition is to be performed either according to the manufacturer’s instructions or using kindling of mass of 500g or 10% of the fuel load, whichever is greater. Any bottom air entry is to be open during ignition.

o Any batch charges shall not be less than

20% of the total fuel loading.

o The adding of further batch charges

should not exceed 3 hours.

o Any batch charges shall not be less than

20% of the total fuel loading.

o One test is required.

o A Temperature Safety Test is also

required.

H EAT FLOW
- EFFICIENCY

o If the test fuel is wood logs, the

combustible constituents of the residue need not be measured, but can be taken as 0.5 % points of efficiency. o If the test fuel is wood logs, the combustible constituents of the residue need not be measured, but can be taken as 0.5 % points of efficiency.

o Efficiency is calculated by the indirect method, considering the heat losses

determined from the mean value of the flue gas and room temperature, the flue gas composition and the combustible matter in the residue. E MISSIONS

o CO 2 or O 2 and CO are measured during the complete test duration.

o For the calculation of the emissions from a combustion period, the measured data

sets are first averaged over the complete combustion period. Afterwards transformation to the desired units (mg/m3 at certain oxygen level or lb/MMBtu) is performed.4 -11 

## 4.2 Commercial heating systems

For commercial heating systems > 1025 MBtu, no European standards are defined. These plants undergo individual commissioning procedures. An example of a commissioning report is added in the annex.4-124.3 SummaryTable 4-8 summary of standards for residential heating systems303-5 12809 12815 13229 13240 15250 14785Full title Heating boilers for solidfuels, hand andautomatically stocked,nominal heat output of upto 300 kW - Terminology,requirements, testing andmarkingResidentialindependent boilersfired by solid fuel –Nominal heat outputup to 50 kW –Requirements andtest methodsResidentialcookers fired bysolid fuel –Requirementsand testmethodsInset appliancesincluding openfires fired by solidfuels –Requirements andtesting methodsRoom-heatersfired by solid fuel– Requirementsand test methodsSlow heat releaseappliances firedby solid fuel –Requirements andtest methodsResidential spaceheatingappliances firedby wood pellets –Requirements andtest methodsAppliance Boilers for hydronic heatingwithout direct spaceheating outputResidentialindependent solidfuel fired boilerswith heat direct toliving roomCookers (withor withoutwatercirculation)Freestanding orinset appliancesRoom-heaters(with or withoutwater circulation)Hand fuelledintermittentburning slow heatrelease appliancesResidential spaceheatingappliances firedby wood pellets(with and withoutwater circulation)Fuel wood and fossil fuels Solid mineral fuels, peat briquettes, natural or manufactured wood logs or multi-fuel in accordancewith the operation instructions of the appliancewood pelletsHeatOutputdetermined on the basis ofwater flow andtemperaturestotal heat output: based on efficiency, fuel input and calorific valuehot water output: based on water flow and temperaturesspace heating output: difference of total heat output and hot water outputon the basis ofefficiency, fuelinput and calorificvaluesee 12809Efficiency Direct method: Quotient ofheat output and heat input.Indirect method for controlpurposes onlyIndirect method: flue gas loss from heat, un-burnt matter and losses in the ash from un-burnt combustible matterEmissions CO2or O2, CO, OGC, TSP(NOXwhere appropriate)CO2or O2and CO5-1 

# 5 Regulations for biomass installations

Performance regulations for biomass installations (emission limits and thermal efficiency requirements) aim at increasing the number of newly installed, state-of-the-art appliances, thus decreasing the number of old technologies in operation. The end result is thereby the continuous improvement in performance of biomass appliances in operation. These regulations have to consider the diff erent performance levels of appliances in Europe and at the same time encourage all countries to improve their technologies, regardless if the country is leading or lagging behind in combustion technology. In order to embrace all technology stages in the European Union, different emission and efficiency classes are defined for boilers in EN 303-5. Additionally, national requirements and eco labeling programs also encourage technology development to increase performance levels. Figure 5-1 shows efficiency requirements for boilers in the EN 303-5 (classes 1 to 3 are currently in practice and classes 3 to 5 are under discussion) and efficiency requirements from Austrian, German and Scandinavian eco-labels. A continuous increase of efficiency requirements is one major driving force for technology developments.

45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80% 85% 90%

0 300 600 900 1200 1500 nominal load in mBTU/h class 3

class 2

class 1 class 4 class 5efficiency based on GCV Blue Angel (G)/Umweltzeichen (A) Nordic Swan (Scandinavia)

Figure 5-1 efficiency requirements for boilers from EN 303-5 (class 1 to class 5) and efficiency requirements from Austrian, German and Scandinavian eco-labels; efficiencies based on GCV were converted for pellets fuel5-2 

## 5.1 European level

5.1.1 Regulations for boilers

EN 303-5 sets the standards for solid fuel boilers with a nominal heat load up to 1025 MBtu/h. In EN 303-5 emission limits for CO, OGC and dust as well as thermal efficiency requirements for solid fuel boilers are specified. In order to embrace the diverse combustion standards from EU member states, three different emission and efficiency classes were defined. Table 5-1 shows the emission limits for wood fuel and fossil fuel boilers in the valid standard. Table 5-1 emission limits for biogenic fuels in EN 303-5Stoking Nominal heat load in MBtu/h Emission limits at 12% O 2
CO in mg/m3 OGC in mg/m3 Dust 3) in mg/m3 (and lb/MMBtu) class class class class class class class class class

1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3Manual1) 170 20455 6545 4090 1635 245 120 165 (0.22) 145 (0.20) 125 (0.17) 170 - 510 10227 4090 2045 1230 165 80 165 (0.22) 145 (0.20) 125 (0.17) 510 - 1025 10227 1635 980 1230 165 80 165 (0.22) 145 (0.20) 125 (0.17)Automatic2) 170 12270 4090 2455 1430 165 80 165 (0.20) 145 (0.18) 125 (0.15) 170 - 510 10230 3680 2045 1020 120 65 165 (0.20) 145 (0.18) 125 (0.15) 510 - 1025 10230 1635 980 1020 120 65 165 (0.20) 145 (0.18) 125 (0.15)

1) Based on the higher heat value (GCV) and the heat value for solid wood (dust values only) 2) Based on the higher heat value (GCV) and the heat value for pellets (dust values only) 3) Dust emission limits are identical for automatical and manual systems in EN 303-5, conversion from mg/m3 to lb/MMBtu results in higher emission limits for manually stoked appliances, though (see Table 3-2 on page 2)

The emission limits for fossil fuels will be identical to the emission limits for biogenic fuels, except for dust – emissions (brown coal fuel assumed):

• class 1: 145 mg/m at 12% O 2 and 0.185 lb/MMBtu

• class 2: 125 mg/m at 12% O 2 and 0.160 lb/MMBtu

• class 3: 100 mg/m at 12% O 2 and 0.130 lb/MMBtu5-3 The efficiency requirements from EN 303- 5 are calculated as follows (based on the GCV):

• 41 + 5.5·log P n for class 1

• 50 + 5.5 log P n for class 2

• 59 + 5.5 log P n for class 3
where P n is the nominal heat load of the boiler in MBtu/h. A revision of the EN 303-5 is currently in progress and new emission classes (class 4 and 5) are being discussed. Class 1 and 2 will be phased out as more stringent class 4 and 5 are phased in. The actual status of the discussi on regarding wood fuel boilers is shown in Table 5-2. In addition to lower emission levels, the future standard will be valid for higher loads (1025 – 1700 MBtu/h) as well. Table 5-2 proposed future emission limits for biogenic fuels in EN 303-5Stoking Nominal heat load in MBtu/h Emission at 12% O 2 CO limits in mg/m3 OGC limits in mg/m3 Dust 3) in mg/m3 (and lb/MMBtu) class class class class class class class class class

3 4 5 3 4 5 3 4 5Manual1) 170 4090 820 410 125 60 40 125 (0.17) 60 (0.08) 50 (0.07) 170 - 510 2045 615 245 80 40 25 125 (0.17) 60 (0.08) 50 (0.07) 510 - 1025 980 410 205 80 10 10 125 (0.17) 60 (0.08) 50 (0.07) 1025 –

1710 980 410 205 80 10 10 125 (0.17) 60 (0.08) 50 (0.07)Automatic2) 170 2455 820 410 80 60 40 125 (0.15) 60 (0.08) 50 (0.06) 170 - 510 2045 615 245 65 60 40 125 (0.15) 60 (0.08) 50 (0.06) 510 - 1025 980 410 205 65 40 20 125 (0.15) 60 (0.08) 50 (0.06) 1025 –

1710 980 410 205 65 40 20 125 (0.15) 60 (0.08) 50 (0.06)

1) Based on the higher heat value (GCV) and the heat value for solid wood (dust values only) 2) Based on the higher heat value (GCV) and the heat value for pellets (dust values only) 3) Dust emission limits are identical for automat ical and manual systems in EN 303-5, conversion from mg/m3 to lb/MMBtu results in higher emission limits for manually stoked appliances, though (see Table 3-2 on page 2)5- 4 The emission limits for fossil fuels will be identical to the emission limits for biogenic fuels, except for dust – emissions (brown coal fuel assumed):

• class 4

o manual stoking: 60 mg/m at 12% O 2 /0.075 lb/MMBtu

o automatic stoking: 50 mg/m at 12% O 2 /0.060 lb/MMBtu

• class 5: 40 mg/m at 12% O 2 /0.050 lb/MMBtu In the future EN 303-5, the following efficiency requirements are being discussed for classes 4 and 5 (based on the GCV):

• 76 + log P n for class 4

• 80 + log P n for class 5
where P n is the nominal heat load of the boiler in MBtu/h.


### 5.1.2 Regulations for room heaters

For room-heaters a number of standards apply, providing efficiency requirements and limits for CO-emission. In Table 5-3 a summary of efficiency and emission requirements of these standards are given. This summary shows the broad range of emission limits and efficiency requirements for diverse room-heating technologies. Table 5-3 Summary of efficiency and CO-requirements in standards for room-heating appliances

Type of appliance Standard M inimum efficiency 1) in % CO limits in mg/m3 at 12% O 2 cookers EN 12815 55 2) 14065 slow heat release inset EN 13229 65 2) 280 fireplace insets (closed doors) 25 2) 1410

room-heater EN 13240 for closed doors class 1: class 2: class 3: 60 2) 55 2) 45 2) class 1: class 2: 420 1410

pellet stove EN 14785 nominal load: partial load: 70 65 nominal load: partial load: 565 845 slow heat release appliances EN 15250 60 2) 4220

1) related to higher heating value (GCV) 2) based on heat value for solid wood


## 5.2 National levels

All EU member states are allowed to introduce stricter and additional requirements for combustion appliances than provided in the standards. In the following section, national regulations for emissions and efficiencies of biomass appliances are shown for Austria, Germany and the Scandinavian countries. Regulations for small scale (residential) appliances and, if available, for medium to large scale (commercial) appliances are quoted.5-5 Additional legal requirements and environmental labels, which are often linked to additional financial incentives, are also being introduced by some countries.



### 5.2.1 Austria

Currently, two regulations apply to the emission limits and energy-efficiency requirements of residual small combustion installations:

• The Vereinbarung gemaeß Art. 15a B-VG ueber Schutzmaßnahme n betreffend Kleinfeuerungen sets emission limits fo r combustion units < 1365 MBtu/h.

• In the Vereinbarung gemaeß Art. 15a B-VG ueber die Einsparung von Energie minimum efficiency requirements are defined for combustion installations < 1365 MBtu/h. The regulation for combustion units of < 1365 MBtu/h makes a distinction between manually and automatically stoked appliances as well as fossil fuels and biofuels. The Austrian limits for these installations are in any case lower than the emissions levels in EN 303-5, class 3. There are also additional limits set for NO X . Emission limit values for appliances < 1365 MBtu/h are presented in Table 5-4. Table 5-4 Austrian emission limits for installations < 1365 MBtu/h (Vereinbarung Art. 15a B-VG)

Stoking and fuel types Emission limits in mg/m3 12 % O 2 Dust in lb/MMBtu CO NO X OGC dust

Manual Biogenic solid fuels 2) 1840 1) 2510 135 100 0.135 Fossil solid fuels 3 ) 1840 185 135 100 0.125

Automatic Biogenic solid fuels 4) 8470 2540 70 100 0.125 Fossil solid fuels 3 ) 8470 185 70 75 0.095
1) of partial load (30 %) the limit may be exceeded by 50 % 2) solid wood fuel assumed 3) brown coal fuel assumed 4) pellets fuel assumed

The adoption of these emission limits due to improved combustion technologies and an increasing variety of biomass fuels is currently under discussion. The present status of this discussion is shown in Table 5-5.5-6 Table 5-5 Future Austrian emission limits for installations < 1365 MBtu – present status of discussion

Fuel types and appliances Emission limits in mg/m3 12 % O 2 Dust in lb/MMBtu CO NO X OGC dust

wood fuels room-heaters 1) 1840 250 145/85 100/60 0.135/0.080 boilers 2 ) 850 250/170 85/50 85/50 0.105/0.060 other standardised biog. fuels 2) < 170 mBUT/h 1860 505 85 100/60 0.125/0.075
> 170 mBUT/h 850 500 50 100/60 0.125/0.075

fossil fuels 3) < 170 mBUT/h 2020 185 145 90/65 0.115/0.080 > 170 mBUT/h 920 185 55 90/65 0.115/0.080 XX/YY: values valid from coming into force/values valid from 2015 1) solid wood fuel assumed 2) pellet fuel assumed 3) brown coal fuel assumed

Regulations for the minimum efficiency distinguish between room-heating appliances and boilers. For room heating appliances the minimum efficiency is 70 %, whereas it is 62 % for cookers. For boilers, the minimum efficiency depends on the type of stoking and the nominal heat load, as shown in Table 5-6. Table 5-6 minimum efficiency requirements for boilers < 1365 MBtu/h (Vereinbarung Art. 15a B-VG) Stoking Nominal heat load in MBtu/h Efficiency 1) in %

Manual stoking 3) < 35 65 % 35 – 680 (57 + 7.1 log P n 2) ) % > 680 75 %

Automatic stoking 4) < 35 70 % 35 – 680 (60 + 7.1 log P n ) % > 680 80 %
1) related to the higher heating value (GCV) 2) nominal heat load in MBtu/h 3) based on the heat value for solid wood 4) Based on the heat value for pellets

Environmental label – Umweltzeichen The Umweltzeichen (environmental label) was introduced by the Austrian Government. For wood appliances (boilers and room heaters) the Environmental Label number 37 specifies emission and efficiency requirements. In Table 5-7 the emission limits for boilers and room heaters according to the Environmental Label are shown.5-7 Table 5-7 Austrian Environmental Label emission limits for boilers and room-heaters (Umweltzeichen)

Appliance fuel Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12 % O 2 Dust in lb/MMBtu CO/OGC (nominal load) CO/OGC (partial load 2) ) NO X dust

Boiler pellets 100/5 230/5 170 25 0.030 wood chips 250/10 4 95/15 200 50 0.080 solid wood 420/50 1250 200 50 0.070Roomheater pellets 205/10 450/20 170 35 0.042 solid wood 1170/85 - / - 200 50 0.070
1) related to the lower heating value (NCV) 2) for pellets and wood chips: 30% of nominal load, for solid wood: 50% of nominal load

Table 5-8 shows the efficiency requirements for boilers and room-heaters according to the Austrian Environmental Label. Table 5-8 Austrian Environmental Label efficiency requirements for room-heaters and boilers (Umweltzeichen)

Stoking Efficiency in % related to upper heating value (GCV) Boilers Roomheaters Manua l 2) 62 + 7.1 log P n 1) 70 Automatic 3) 85 85
1) nominal heat load in MBtu/h 2) based on heat value for solid wood 3) based on the heat value for pellets

In addition to these requirements, the losses due to radiation of the boilers are also limited:

• up to 340 MBtu/h: maximum losses of 2.5 % by radiation

• 340 – 1365 MBtu/h: maximum losses of 1.5 % by radiation

Medium to large scale (commercial) applications The Feuerungsanlagen-Verordnung, BGBl. II Nr. 331/1997, which came into force on June 1 st 1998, covers residential installations with a nominal heat capacity > 1365 MBtu/h as well as commercial combustion units > 170 MBtu/h. Table 5-9 and Table 5-10 show the emission limits for CO, dust, NO X and HC for biomass appliances and emission limits for CO, dust, NO X and SO 2 for coal and coke appliances according to the Feuerungsanlagenverordnung.5-8 Table 5-9 Austrian emission limits for commercial bio mass appliances according to the Feuerungsanlagenverordnung (FAV)

Installation heat load in MBtu/h Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12% O 2 Dust lb/MMBtu CO HC NO X dust fuel1 fuel2 fuel3 170 – 340 900 1) 55 340 280 565 170 0.210 3) 340 – 1195 900 55 340 280 565 170 0.210 3) 1,195 – 6,830 280 25 340 280 565 170 0.275 4) 6,830 – 17,075 280 25 340 280 565 55 2) 0.090 2), 4) 17,075 – 34,150 115 25 340 280 395 55 0.090 4) > 34,150 115 25 340 225 395 55 0.090 4)

1) at 30 % load limit may be exceeded by 50 % 2) from 1 st January 2010 fuel1: beech, oak, non-treated bark, brushwood, cones fuel1: other non-treated wood fuel1: derived timber products (no heavy metals or halogen organic compounds in binder, hardener and coating) 3) Based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, pellets assumed 4) Based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, wood chips assumed

Table 5-10 Austrian emission limits for commercial coal and coke appliances according to the Feuerungsanlagenverordnung (FAV)

Installation heat load in MBtu/h Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12% O 2 Dust 1) lb/MMBtu CO NO X SO 2 dust

170 – 340 1125 - - 170 0.215 340 – 1195 1125 450 - 170 0.215 1,195 – 6,830 170 450 - 170 0.215 6,830 – 17,075 170 450 - 55 0.070 17,075 – 34,150 170 395 450 55 0.070 > 34,150 170 115 225 55 0.070
4) Based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, brown coal assumed

In the Feuerungsanlagenverordnung, a minimum efficiency of 75 % based on the GCV for automatically stoked solid fuel appliances used for room heating or domestic hot water production is required.


### 5.2.2 Germany

In Germany, the 1. BImSchV ( Bundes Immissions Schutz Verordnung fuer Kleinfeuerungsanlagen ) regulates the Emissions for small scale installations. It was implemented in 1988 and has since then been revised twice (in 1997 and 2003) and is currently undergoing a third revision. In Table 5-11 the valid emission limits for biomass combustion appliances with nominal heat loads > 50 MBtu/h is shown.5-9 Table 5-11 German emission limits for biomass combustion appliances according to the valid 1 st BImSchV (1st BImSchV)

fuel nominal heat load in MBtu/h emissions in mg/m3 at 12 % O 2 dust in lb/MMBtu CO dust non-treated wood in pieces, i.e. shavings, and straw or other plant products 50 – 170 4500 170 0.230 1) 170 – 510 2250 170 0.230 1) 510 – 1705 1125 170 0.275 2) > 1705 565 170 0.275 2) painted, coated or laminated wood, plywood and chipboards 50 – 340 900 170 0.275 2) 340 – 1705 565 170 0.275 2)

> 1705 340 170 0.275 2)

1) based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, solid wood assumed 2) based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, wood chips assumed No specific efficiency requirements are given in the 1. BImSchV for biomass boilers. Table 5-12 future German emission limits for biomass boilers according to the 1 st BImSchV (1st BImSchV – Draft from July 2009)

Fuel Installation built after 1 s t BImSchV came into force Installations built after 2014 1)

nominal heat load (MBtu/h) E-limits in mg/m3 at

12% O 2 dust in lb/ MMBtu nominal heat load

(Btu/h) E-limits in mg/m3 at

12% O 2 dust in lb/ MMBtu CO dust CO dust

non treated wood 2) 15 – 1705 1125 115 0.185 7)

15 450 25 0.040 7) 0.030 8) 0.030 9) > 1705 565 115 0.185 7)

pellets 3) 15 – 1705 900 70 0.085 8) > 1705 565 70 0.085 8)

coal 15 – 1705 1125 100 0.125 9) > 1705 565 100 0.125 9)
pre treated wood 4) 170 – 340 900 115 0.185 7) 170 – 1705 450 25 0.040 7) 340 – 1 7 05 565 115 0.185 7) > 1705 340 115 0.185 7) > 1705 340 25 0.040 7)
stra w 15 - 340 1125 115 - 15 – 340 450 25 -
1) solid wood emission limits instated in 2017 2) non-treated wood (pieces, shavings), straw or other plant products – wood chips assumed for dust emissions 3) pressed untreated wood (briquettes, pellets, etc.) 4) painted, varnished or coated wood; plywood, chipboards, fibre boards (no reservatives used, no heavy metals of halogen organic compounds – solid wood assumed for dust emissions 5) straw and similar plant materials 6) all dust emissions based on the higher heating value (GCV) 7) based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, wood chips assumed 8) based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, pellets assumed 9) based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, brown coal assumed Table 5-12 shows the recent status of the discussion for the new emission (and efficiency) requirements for biomass boilers. No specific efficiency requirements are given in the draft version of the 1 st BImSchV for biomass boilers.5-10 Table 5-13 shows the recent discussion status for new emission (and efficiency) requirements for room-heaters.
Room-heaters that were installed before the future 1 st BImSchV was implemented are only allowed to be operated, if

• dust emissions are < 0.228 lb/MBtu (150 mg/m3 at 13% O 2 ) and

• CO-emissions are < 6.090 lb/MBtu (4000 mg/m3 at 13% O 2 ) Otherwise they must be upgraded with emission control technology or placed out of operation corresponding to a time schedule. Table 5-13 future German emission and efficiency requirements for room-heaters according to 1 st BImSchV (1st BImSchV – Draft)

Type of appliance Standard Installation built after 1 s t BImSchV came into force Installations built after 2014

Efficiency 1)

(%) Emission in mg/m3 limits

at 12% O 2 Dust in lb/ MMBtu Emission in mg/m3 limits at 12% O 2 Dust in lb/ MMBtu CO dust CO dust room heater (intermittent operation) EN 13240 65 2250 115 0.150 2) 1405 45 0.061

room heater (continuous operation) 60 2810 115 0.150 2) 1405 45 0.061

slow heat release appliances EN 15250 65 2250 115 0.150 2) 1405 45 0.061

closed inset

EN 13229 65 2250 115 0.150 2) 1405 45 0.061 slow heat release inset (intermittent) 70 2250 115 0.150 2) 1405 45 0.061

slow heat release inset (continuous) 70 2815 115 0.150 2) 1405 45 0.061

cookers EN 12815 60 3375 115 0.150 2)

1690 45 0.061 cookers (with room heater function) 65 3940 115 0.150 2) 45 0.061

pellet stove EN 14785 80 450 55 0.070 3) 280 35 0.040 pellet stove with boiler 85 450 35 0.040 3) 280 25 0.030

1) related to the higher heating value (GCV)

Environmental Label – The Blue Angel The Blue Angel label is sponsored and administered by the German Federal Environmental Agency and the Quality Assurance and Product Labeling Institute RAL Deutsches Institut fuer Guetesicherung und Kennzeichnung e.V. This label provides additional emission and efficiency requirem ents for pellet stoves and pellet boilers (Table 5-14).5-11 Table 5-14 Emission limits for the German Blue Angel label (Blue Angel)

appliance Efficiency (%) 1) Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12% O 2 for nominal/partial load dust in lb/mmBtu CO NO X TOC dust pellet stove 85 200/450 170/- 10/20 30/- 0.035 / - pellet boiler 100/225 170/- 5/5 25/- 0.030 / - 1) related to the higher heating value (GCV) XXX/YYY: values for nominal load/values for partial load

Medium to large scale applications In the TA Luft, emission limits for CO, dust, NO X and OGC are given for medium to large scale appliances. The emission limits for non treated and pretreated biomass are given in Table 5-15. The installation heat load for installations that burn pretreated wood is limited to 170 MMBtu/h. Table 5-15 German emission limits for medium to large scale appliances according to the TA Luft

Fuel Heat load in MMBtu/h Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12 % O 2 Dust 3) lb/MMBtu CO OGC NO X dust non treated biomass  8.5 135 1) 10 225 90 0.150 other biomass 2) 135 1) 10 360 45 0.075 non treated biomass 8.5 – 17 135 10 225 45 0.075 other biomass 2) 135 10 360 45 0.075 non treated biomass > 17 135 10 225 20 0.030 other biomass 2) 135 10 360 20 0.030
1) emission limit only valid for nominal load 2) painted, varnished or coated wood; plywood, chipboards, fibre boards (no preservatives used, no heavy metals or halogen organic compounds) 3) based on heat value for wood chips

For non treated biomass appliances, TA Luft requires continuous measurement of dust emissions:

• from 17 to 85 MMBtu/h: qualitative measurement

• from 85 MMBtu/h: measurement of mass concentration In addition, the continuous measurement of CO-emissions for heat loads > 9 MMBtu/h is required. No efficiency requirements are specified in the TA Luft.
For fossil solid fuels emission limits are identical to the emission limits for “other biomass” in Table 5-16. Additionally emission limits for SO 2 are requested:5-12 • fluidised bed combustion: 315 mg/m3 at 12% O 2

• other combustion technology

o mineral coal: 1170 mg/m3 at 12% O 2

o other fossil fuels: 900 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 (TA Luft)



### 5.2.3 Denmark

The Danish Guidelines for Air Emission Regulation (Environmental Guidelines no. 1, 2002) apply to all emitting installations, wh ile the Statutory Order, regulating air pollution from wood burners and boilers and certain other fixed energy producing installations applies to combustion installations with a total input of < 1025 MBtu/h. Handcrafted masonry heaters are excluded from this regulation. In Table 5-16 the Danish emission limits for biomass boilers are shown. Table 5-16 Danish emission limits for biomass boilers (according to EN 303-5, Class 3) (Statutory Order) Appliance and fuel types Nominal heat load MBtu/h Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12% O 2 Dust in lb/MMBtu CO OGC dust

Manual stoking Biomass 1) < 170 4090 125 125 0.165 3) 170 – 510 2045 80 125 0.165 3) 510 – 1025 980 80 125 0.165 3)

Fossil 2) < 170 4090 125 100 0.125 4) 170 – 510 2045 80 100 0.125 4) 510 – 1025 980 80 100 0.125 4)

Automatic stoking Biomass 1) < 170 2455 80 125 0.150 5) 170 – 510 2045 65 125 0.125 5) 510 - 1025 980 65 125 0.125 5)

Fossil 2) < 170 2455 80 100 0.210 4) 170 – 510 2045 65 100 0.210 4) 510 – 1025 980 65 100 0.210 4)

1) wood, plant seed and other residual products 2) fixed carbon or coal 3) based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, solid wood assumed 4) based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, brown coal assumed 5) based on the higher heat value (GCV) of the fuel, pellets assumed In addition, the efficiency requirements according to EN 303-5 are requested (based on the GCV):

•  GCV 59 + 5.5 log P n where P n is the nominal heat load of the boiler in MBtu/h. For room-heaters, dust emissions are limited depending on the method of measurement:

• Measurement in dilution tunnel: 0.16 oz/lb (10 g/kg) fuel; max. 0.32 oz/lb (20 g/kg) fuel in the individual testing intervals

• Measurement in the flue gas pipe (according to EN 13240): 0.115 lb/MMBtu (75 mg/m3 at 13 % O 2 )5-13 Efficiency and emissions requirements for room heaters according to EN 13240:

•  GCV 44 % (class 3)

• CO < 1405 mg/m 3 at 12 % O 2 (class 2)

Environmental label – The Nordic Swan The Nordic Swan was introduced by the Nordic Council of Ministers and it is a common system for Sweden, Norway , Denmark and Finland . It provides criteria for closed fireplaces and solid biomass boilers. Table 5-17 presents efficiency and emission requirements for (closed) room-heaters. Table 5-17 Nordic Swan efficiency and emission requirements for closed room-heaters (Nordic Swan)

Appliance Efficiency 1) (%) Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12 % O 2 at nominal load Dust in g/kg fuel and (lb/MMBtu) at nominal load/ partial load/ for each individual test CO OGC

slow heat release appliance 2) 70 170 2250 1/- / - (0.020/-/-) inset (manual stoking) 2) 65 170 2815 3/8/15 (0.050/0.120/0.230) stove (manual stoking) 2) 170 2815 3/5/10 (0.045/0.080/0.150) stove (automatic stoking) 3) 70 55 1125 2/5/10 (0.030/0.070/0.135)

1) related to the lower heating value (NCV) 2) based on heat value for solid wood 3) based on heat value for pellets XXX/YYY/ZZZ: values for nominal load/values for partial load/values for each individual test

In Table 5-18 emission requirements for boilers are exhibited. Table 5-18 Nordic Swan emission requirements for boilers (Nordic Swan)

Stoking Nominal heat load in kW Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12 % O 2 Dust in lb/MMBtu CO NO 2 OGC dust Automatic  1025 330 280 20 35 0.040 1)

Manual  340 1640 280 60 55 0.080 2) 340 - 1025 820 280 40 55 0.080 2)

1) based on heat values for pellets 2) based on heat values for solid wood Dust and NO X emissions are tested only at nominal load Testing procedure for OGC and CO-emissions:

- nominal heat load for manually stoked boilers

- nominal load and partial load for automatically stoked boilers5-1 4 Efficiency requirements for boilers are shown in Table 5-19. Table 5-19 Nordic Swan efficiency requirements for boiler (Nordic Swan) Stoking Efficiency 1) in % Manua l 3) at nominal load: 65 + 5.5 log P n 2)

Automatic 4) at nominal load: 70 + 5.5 log P n 2)and x 80 % where x = (20 + 40 + 60)/3 with 20, 40, 60 are measured efficiencies at 20, 40 and 60% load

1) related to the higher heating value (GCV) 2) nominal heat load in MBtu/h 3) based on heat values for pellets 4) based on heat values for solid wood
Medium to large scale appliances For medium to large scale appliances, efficiency and fuel quality requirements are defined, but there are no requirements for emissions. Medium to large scale appliances have to reach efficiencies larger than 68% based on the GCV (Brønnum 2009).



### 5.2.4 Finland

In Finland, a proposal for the regulation of emissions and efficiencies for heating appliances using wood fuels has been in the works, under discussion and review since 2006. This regulation will apply to new biomass installations that provide heat, domestic hot water or other energy services with a nominal heat load up to 1025 MBtu/h. The proposal distinguishes primary and secondary heating systems. Primary heating systems provide all required heat/hot water on their own, while secondary heating systems have another (main) heat source. Table 5-20 shows the suggested emission and efficiency requirements for Finland. Table 5-20 Proposed Finnish emission and efficiency requirements for biomass boilers < 1025 MBtu/h kW (EuP Lot 15, Task1)
Heating system Nominal heat load (MBtu/h) Efficiency 1) (%) Emission limits in mg/m3 at 12% O 2 CO OGC

primary  170 59+ 5.5 log P

n 2) 2455 80 170 – 510 2045 65 > 510 980 65

secondary  170 59 + 5.5 log P

n 2) 4090 125 170 – 510 2045 80 > 510 980 80
1) related to the higher heating value (GCV), based on heat value for solid wood 2) nominal heat load in MBtu/h

In Table 5-21 the Finnish emission and efficiency requirements for fireplaces (room heaters) is shown. Fireplaces that do not fulfi ll the requirements are still allowed, but they have to be marked as useable only for decorative purposes.5-15 Table 5-21 Proposed Finnish emission an d efficiency requirements for fireplaces (room-heaters) (EuP Lot 15, Task1)

Heating system Nominal heat load (MBtu/h) Efficiency 1) (%) CO (mg/m3) at 12% O 2 primary  170 60 2455 secondary 4220

1) related to the higher heating value (GCV), based on heat value for solid wood
Medium to large scale appliances For medium to large scale applications, national dust requirements are given:

• 3.4 – 17 MMBtu/h: < 0.465 lb/MMBtu

• 17 – 170 MMBtu/h: < 0.200 - 4 / 3 ·(P n -0.01) lb/MMBtu Additionally, emission limits can be requested by local authorities for heating plants > 17 MMBtu/h. For appliances > 170 MMBtu/h approval is needed by even higher authorities and these limits are open to public (Oravainen 2009).

Environmental label – The Nordic Swan



### 5.2.5 Sweden

In Sweden emission limits for small scale solid fuel appliances are included in the building regulation (BFS 2006:12). The regulation applies to solid fuel installations with nominal heat loads < 1025 MBtu/h. The emission limits for solid fuel appliances are shown in Table 5-22. The CO requirements do not apply to open fireplaces, tiled stoves (masonry heaters) and cook stoves. Table 5-22 Swedish emission limits for solid fuel appliances < 1025 MBtu/h (EuP Lot 15, Task1)

Stoking Nominal heat load (MBtu/h) OGC in mg/m3 at 12% O 2

manual  170 125 170 – 1025 80

automatic  170 80 170 – 1025 65

For secondary heating systems (another main heat source is used), limits for COemission are given:

• for stoves and fireplaces inserts: CO < 3300 mg/m3 at 12% O 2

• for pellet stoves: CO < 440 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 These CO requirements do not apply to open fireplaces, tiled stoves (masonry heaters) and cook stoves. For efficiency requirements only recommendations are given:5-16 • for stoves:  > 53 % (on GCV basis)

• for fireplace inserts:  > 44 % (on GCV basis)

• for pellet stoves:  > 65 % (on GCV basis)

Environmental label – The Nordic Swan6-1 

# 6 Performance of biomass installations

Technology forcing efforts of regulations, technology cluster investment, competition among manufacturers and Eco-labeling efforts have resulted in commercially available technologies with performance far exceeding regulatory requirements. This chapter describes the top performing biomass technologies based on thermal efficiency, CO , NO X and dust (fine particles) emissions. For selection of the TOP 25% performing technologies in each size category, thermal efficiency and CO data at full load is used due to the availability of this information. Recall that for many technologies, especially boilers the thermal efficiency curve is linear down to very low part loads with these technologies (Figure 6-1).



## 6.1 Introduction

6.1.1 Data sources

Before installation of biomass a ppliances is allowed, they have to pass the efficiency and emission requirements of the current Eu ropean standards as well as the national/regional regulations. Small scale appliances are usually type-tested by certified testing houses. Results of these tests are property of biomass appliances’ manufacturer and are therefore not usually publicly available. Ho wever, some local and national organisations collect and publish test data which they collect from manufacturers or from test houses. In order to receive test data of biomass appliances in the considered countries, the following sources were used:

• Web site of FJ-BLT ( http://www.josephinum.at ), an Austrian testing laboratory

• Publications of the Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (FNR) on biomass boilers and pellet stoves available on the German market

• Web page of Teknologisk Institut ( http://www.teknologisk.dk ), a Danish testing house

• Web page of the Danish Environmental Protection Agency ( http://www.mst.dk )

• Written information of the Tekn ikfoeretagens Branschgrup per AB, the Swedish Heating Boilers and Burners Association (contact person: Magnus Davidsson)

• Web site and written information of the HKI Industrieverband Haus-, Heiz und Kuechentechnik e.V., the German heat technology association (contact person: Frank Kienle)

• Written information of following manufacturers of biomass appliances:

o Veljekset Ala-Talkkari (Finland)

o Nunnauuni Oy (Finland)

o Rika (Austria)

o Calimax (Austria)

Information from these sources about test data varies from the simple statement that the appliances have passed the efficiency an d emission requirements to detailed data on efficiency and emissions at nominal and partial load as well as investment costs.6-2 

### 6.1.2 Selection method for TOP 25% performing appliances

For the selection of the TOP 25% pe rforming biomass appliances, the efficiency and CO-emissions at full load (nominal heating load) were considered:

• The efficiency of an appliance provides information regarding the extent the fuel input is used to produce hot water and/or room heat. It is therefore one of the most important quality criteria.

• CO-emissions are the prime indicators of the combustion quality of biomass appliances (chapter 4). If CO-emissions are low, the emissions of OGC as well as the organic fraction of the TSP (total suspended particulate matter) will also be low. NOx-emissions depend primarily on the nitrogen content of the fuel; therefore, they are not considered for the selection of the TOP 25% performing appliances.

• The full load range is chosen for the selection method, because most data is available at this load. The appliances with the highest efficienci es and CO-emissions lower than the average CO-emissions of the considered technology and lo ad range represent the TOP 25% performing appliances.


## 6.2 Stoves/room-heaters

6.2.1 Pellet stoves

The European pellet stove market is quite manageable, because pellets combustion technology is a relatively young te chnology. Manufacturers of pellet stoves are used to having their products tested and are usually willing to publish their test data. As a result, a very broad database was able to be compiled for this study. Therefore, the data given in the list of the TOP 25% performing pellet stoves is considered to be representative of the current market. Table 6-1 shows a summary of the minimu m, maximum and average efficiency and emission values at full load for all the con sidered pellet stoves and Table 6-5 shows a summary of the minimum, maximum and ave rage efficiency and emissions values at full load for the TOP 25% pellet stoves with and without water circulation equipment. A total of 79 data sets were recorded, of which 53 were not identical. Identical data sets are a result of manufacturers producing two or mo re appliances, which are identical in terms of all technical aspects and combusti on systems, but have different designs for the housing as well as different model names. However, due to the identical technical design, separate performance tests are not necessary.6-3 Table 6-1 summary of extreme and averaged values for all considered pellet stoves

yes < 30 > 30 all 34 18 27 17 16 19 445 min. 8 30 25 max. 29 132 51 avg. 23 66 38 min. 86 85 84 max. 89 87 85 avg. 87 86 84 min. 75 153 39 max. 844 1316 460 avg. 249 449 174 min. 0.011 0.027 0.014 max. 0.104 0.082 0.087 avg. 0.040 0.052 0.031 min. 15 92 84 max. 259 213 162 avg. 101 139 119 5262 3757 8820 load range (MBtu/h) no water circulate

nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%) No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu)

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$)

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) Pellet stoves with and without water circulation equipment are built in a load range from approximately 10 to 130 MBtu/h, whereby the efficiency of these appliances is 86% on average. Pellet stoves with hot water production attain slightly lower efficiencies. The measured CO-emissions exhibit a very broad range from 75 to 1350 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . This broad variation is due to different combustion chamber materials and diverse control concepts used for the stoves:

• If ceramics are used in the combustion chamber, the combustion temperature will be higher than if steel only is used – the combustion temperature is the most important indicator for low CO-emissions.

• If the control concept of the stove in volves CO or air ratio-measurement, CO emissions can be minimized more easily than if only the combustion gas temperature is measured. If no conce pts for combustion condition optimisation are implemented, the control of the stove is not able to adopt to the operation mode.
The measures for the reduction of CO described ab ove will however result in an increase in cost of the stoves. This is clearly shown in a comparison of the CO emissions in relation to the costs of stoves without water installations having heat loads of <30 and >30 MBtu/h. The average pellet stove with a heat load of < 30 MBtu/h emits approximately 250 mg/m3 CO at 12% O 2 and costs approximately 5250 US$. On the other hand, the average pe llet stove with a heat load > 30 MBtu/H emits nearly twice as much CO (450 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 ), but costs one quarter less (3750 US$). Emissions of TSP vary from 0.015 to 0.100 lb/MMBtu. This broad range can be attributed to the same factors mentioned above. A low combustion temperature will result in a high organic fraction of TSP and the (control) concept for the air supply influences the amount of fly ash.6- 4 NO X emissions range from 100 to 360 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 and the average value is approximately 120 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . These are typical values for wood combustion. Table 6-2 summary of extreme and averaged values for TOP 25% performing pellet stoves

yes < 30 > 30 all 34 18 27 17 16 19 445 min. 8 30 25 max. 29 34 51 avg. 21 32 38 min. 88 86 85 max. 89 87 85 avg. 88 87 85 min. 86 153 39 max. 236 234 169 avg. 164 180 117 min. 0.033 0.035 0.014 max. 0.072 0.050 0.025 avg. 0.045 0.043 0.019 min. 88 106 125 max. 88 114 162 avg. 88 110 143 8113 4820 9843 no

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu)

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$) water circulate

nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%) No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances load range (MBtu/h)

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) The TOP 25% performing pellet stoves reach average efficiencies from 85 to 87% based on the GCV. Their CO-emissions vary from 40 to 240 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 and the average CO emissions are approximately 155 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . The difference between the CO emissions from pellet stoves without water circulation having heat loads of < 30 MBtu/h and those with heat loads of > 30 MBtu/h still exists, but is definitely smaller. The average dust emissions range from 0.020 to 0.045 lb/MMBtu, a range which is slightly smaller than the average dust emissions calculated from all of the collected data. The NO X emissions from the TOP 25% performing pellet stoves are essentially no different than those from all the other pellet stoves collected for this study. For pellet stoves without water circulation having heat loads of < 30 MBtu/h in particular, a quite notable increase in price for the TOP 25% is observed in comparison to the average price of all the collected data.



### 6.2.2 Solid wood stoves

The solid wood stove market is extremely br oad and diverse as manufacturers come from many different backgrounds (masonry heater industry, steel industry, biomass boiler industry, etc.) and as such define the main purposes for their products differently (e.g., efficient heating, stove design, lifestyle product, etc.). Moreover, many uncertified products, which do not conform to the standard EN 13240 are also offered on the market.6-5 The publishing of test data is not common for wood stoves. The fact that the emissions from wood stoves are difinitively higher those from pellet stoves or biomass boilers discourages manufacturers from publishing test data. For these reasons, only a small group of wood stoves data could be collected and evaluated.
Table 6-3 and Table 6-4 show the mi nimum, maximum and average efficiency and emissions values at full load for all analysed wood stoves and for the TOP 25% performing wood stoves. A total of 51 data sets were recorded, of which 40 were not identical.

Table 6-3 summary of extreme and average values for selected wood stoves

51 40 10 min. 25 max. 128 avg. 57 min. 64 max. 76 avg. 71 min. 776 max. 2535 avg. 1521 min. 0.009 max. 0.128 avg. 0.059 min. 59 max. 225 avg. 139

- NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$) nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%)

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu) No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

1) related to the GCV Table 6-4 summary of extreme and average values for TOP 25% performing wood stoves

51 40 10 min. 25 max. 128 avg. 57 min. 71 max. 76 avg. 73 min. 776 max. 1340 avg. 1069 min. 0.020 max. 0.081 avg. 0.050 min. 59 max. 197 avg. 126

- nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%)

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu)

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$)

No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

The heat loads of the wood stoves vary from 25 to 130 MBtu/h and achieve an average efficiency of 71 % based on the GCV. CO emissions fall into a rather wide range between 750 to 2550 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . Since dust emissions are related to CO emissions due to un-burnt particles in the fly ash fraction, dust emissions also widely vary from 0.010 to 0.130 lb/MMBtu. The average NO X emissions are approximately 140 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 , which is a typical value for wood combustion.6-6 The TOP 25% performing wood stoves reach efficiencies of approximately 73% and emit on average 1050 mg/m3 CO at 12% O 2 , a 33% reduction with respect to the entire data set. The dust emissions still show quite broad variations from 0.020 to 0.080 lb/MMBtu; however, the average data changes marginally in comparison to the entire data set. Altogether, the average data of the TOP 25% performing wood stoves does not exhibit significant improvements in comparison to the entire data set. Detailed performance data of all considered wood stoves is given in the annex. This summary should give an idea of the average emissions as well as the performance of wood stoves. It does not imply that test data from other manufacturers is better or worse than the given data.


### 6.2.7 Masonry heaters

The masonry heater market is similar to that of wood stoves. Data from only two manufacturers (LEDA and Brunner) could be collected. For this reason, performance and emission data will not be summarized for masonry heaters.



## 6.3 Boilers

The European biomass boiler market is quit e large. A very competitive environment and local/national grant schemes for biomass appliances (see diverse environmental labels) lead to a high transparency of performance and emission data. Test data can be found on web pages from national authorities. It is estimated that approximately 90% of Austrian and German boilers were collected for this study. Therefore, the data given in the list of the TOP 25% performing technologies is considered to be an accurate representation of the current market. A total of 954 data sets were recorded, of which 787 were not identical. These identical data sets are a result of manufacturers producing two or more appliances, which are identical in terms of all technical aspects and combustion systems, but have different designs for the housing as well as different model names. Due to the identical technical design, a separate performance test is not necessary.



### 6.3.1 Pellet boiler

Table 6-5 shows a summary of the minimu m, maximum and average efficiency and emission values at full load for all the considered pellet boilers and Table 6-6 shows test data of the TOP25% performing appliances at the defined load ranges. A total of 433 data sets were recorded, of which 362 were not identical.6-7 Table 6-5 overview of extreme and averaged values for all considered pellet boilers

< 55 55 - 100 100 - 170 170 - 340 > 340 124 142 83 52 32 102 130 66 45 29 26 33 17 11 7 min. 26 55 99 171 342 max. 54 98 169 338 997 avg. 45 78 134 254 568 min. 78 73 80 81 81 max. 89 88 89 88 88 avg. 85 84 85 85 85 min. 7 1 3 4 1 max. 371 603 281 338 543 avg. 91 116 76 66 62 min. 0.003 0.008 0.006 0.014 0.004 max. 0.069 0.348 0.377 0.377 0.058 avg. 0.023 0.028 0.030 0.047 0.031 min. 84 12 63 63 63 max. 398 365 378 293 247 avg. 154 168 144 151 133 11359 12149 16052 24795 30244 load range (MBtu/h)

nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%) No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu)

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$)

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) Pellet boilers are built for heat loads starting at 25 MBtu/h and reach high efficiencies independent of their load, in the range of 73 to 89 %. The average efficiency for these boilers is 85 %. CO emissions vary from very small amounts to elevated values of 600 mg/m3 at 12% O 2. The average CO-emissions for all load ranges are, however, below 120 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . Higher loads give rise to lower CO emissions, a fact that can be attributed to the higher combustion temperatures reached in larger appliances as a result of the favourable relationship between combustion chamber volume and combustion chamber surface as well as the better materials that are used. It can be stated that CO-emissions are generally low in pellet boilers. TSP-emissions vary from 0.003 to 0.377 lb/MMBtu; the average emissions are in the range of 0.025 to 0.045 lb/MMBtu, which are very low values.

NO X -emissions fall within a range of 60 to 400 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 ; the average value is approximately 150 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 , which can be considered normal NO X -emissions for wood fuel.6-8 Table 6-6 overview of extreme and average values for TOP 25% performing pellet boilers

< 55 55 - 100 100 - 170 170 - 340 > 340 124 142 83 52 32 102 130 66 45 29 26 33 17 11 7 min. 27 55 102 171 342 max. 53 92 169 331 885 avg. 44 78 141 258 524 min. 86 85 86 86 85 max. 89 88 89 88 88 avg. 87 86 87 86 86 min. 7 1 5 4 5 max. 77 105 73 59 41 avg. 43 39 38 24 17 min. 0.008 0.010 0.006 0.014 0.008 max. 0.043 0.056 0.057 0.053 0.056 avg. 0.022 0.024 0.023 0.036 0.031 min. 95 39 63 105 118 max. 230 260 183 198 171 avg. 140 136 132 154 133 12221 13659 16844 23537 0 nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%)

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu) load range (MBtu/h) No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

avg. retail price (US$) NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 )

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) The TOP 25% performing pellet boilers exhibit average efficiencies 2% higher than that of the entire data set. The CO emissions ar e 50% less than of all considered appliances, and varying from nearly no CO emissions to 105 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . The average dust emissions are slightly lower than the emission values of the entire data and range from 0.02 to 0.035 lb/MMBtu. Detailed performance data of the TOP 25% performing pellet boilers is given in the

annex.



### 6.3.2 Solid wood boiler

Table 6-7 shows a summary of the minimu m, maximum and average efficiency and emission values at full load for all the considered solid wood boilers. Table 6-8 shows test data of the TOP25% performing appliances for the defined load ranges. A total of 279 data sets were recorded, of which 229 were not identical.6-9 Table 6-7 overview of extreme and average values from all considered solid wood boilers

< 85 85 - 120 120 - 170 > 170 69 81 72 57 65 64 54 46 16 16 14 12 min. 40 85 120 171 max. 82 116 167 348 avg. 63 98 141 199 min. 62 73 73 73 max. 84 85 84 84 avg. 80 81 81 81 min. 64 20 18 44 max. 3912 4137 2878 2009 avg. 612 417 399 308 min. 0.008 0.009 0.008 0.012 max. 0.175 0.189 0.324 0.166 avg. 0.034 0.035 0.041 0.036 min. 20 57 34 75 max. 206 225 242 199 avg. 129 133 135 149 8436 9683 11965 14104 CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$) TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu) load range (MBtu/h)

nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%) No. of all test data

No. of top 25% appliances

No. of unequal test data

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) Solid wood boilers are built for heat loads starting at 50 MBtu/h and reach efficiencies from 60 to 85 %. The average efficiencies are approximately 81%, which is 3% lower than the efficiencies reached by pellet boilers. CO-emissions vary from 20 to 4140 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 , which exhibits a very broad variation. This may be attributed to the broad range of control (or no control) concepts 3 for solid wood boilers as well as the materials used in the combustion zone. The average values are approximately 400 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 and decrease with higher load ranges. This can be attributed to the same phenomenon discussed for the pellet boilers. Dust emissions range from 0.010 to 0.325 lb/MMBtu, whereby the average emissions are approximately 0.035 lb/MMBtu, which is nearly as low as the dust emissions from pellet boilers. The average NO X -emissions are approximately 130 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 and thus lie in the normal range for wood combustion.

3 The solid wood boiler is the oldest biomass boiler technology. There are thus a large number of traditional manufacturers who use very traditional design concepts without proper control concepts, resulting in a broad variation.6-10 Table 6-8 overview of extreme and average values from TOP 25% performing solid wood boilers

< 85 85 - 120 120 - 170 > 170 69 81 72 57 65 64 54 46 16 16 14 12 min. 40 85 123 171 max. 75 116 167 239 avg. 63 97 143 189 min. 82 82 82 81 max. 84 83 84 84 avg. 83 83 83 82 min. 64 40 50 44 max. 353 298 343 282 avg. 174 220 152 97 min. 0.014 0.014 0.021 0.015 max. 0.175 0.189 0.324 0.076 avg. 0.039 0.044 0.066 0.033 min. 90 100 34 75 max. 182 186 181 194 avg. 139 126 115 119 10116 10319 12672 14089 NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$) nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%)

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu) load range (MBtu/h) No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) The TOP 25% performing solid wood boilers reach average efficiencies which are 2% higher than the average values from the entire data set. The variation of CO emissions is significantly lower and varies from 40 to 350 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . The average CO emissions decrease by 50 to 75% and range from 100 to 220 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . A decrease of CO emissions with higher loads can also be observed for the TOP 25% performing appliances. Surprisingly and also inconsistent with the st atement that low CO emissions result in low dust emissions, the dust emissions of the TOP 25% performing appliances are higher than the dust emissions for the entire data set. This could be attributed to quality variations of the dust measurement methods. Detailed performance data of the TOP 25% pe rforming solid wood boilers is given in the

annex.


### 6.3.3 Wood chip boiler

Table 6-9 shows a summary of the minimum, maximum and average efficiency- and emission values at full load of all considered wood chip boilers and Table 6-10 shows test data for the TOP25% performing appliances at the defined load ranges. A total of 213 data sets were recorded, of which 174 were not identical.6-11 Table 6-9 overview of extreme and averaged values from all considered wood chip boilers

< 100 100 - 200 200 - 340 340 - 680 > 680 35 65 44 39 30 26 49 42 33 26 7 12 11 8 7 min. 34 102 205 342 683 max. 96 188 340 666 5123 avg. 74 150 265 444 1459 min. 73 68 69 70 46 max. 86 86 86 86 86 avg. 77 77 76 77 75 min. 22 4 7 3 6 max. 489 649 641 368 369 avg. 128 117 106 74 86 min. 0.011 0.009 0.011 0.004 0.024 max. 0.134 0.258 0.237 0.127 0.460 avg. 0.058 0.051 0.052 0.048 0.106 min. 91 45 51 45 45 max. 438 394 411 371 235 avg. 180 145 146 150 122 15921 21887 26468 32373 54890 load range (MBtu/h)

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$) nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%)

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu) No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) Wood chip boilers are available from a nominal load of 35 MBtu/h. The efficiencies vary from 70 to 86% and the average is approximately 77%, meaning that their performance is 4% lower than that of the solid wood boilers. The CO-emissions range from very small amounts to 650 mg/m3 at 12% O 2; the average value is approximately 100 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . Due to the continuous operation conditions, these emission values are similar to the CO-emissions of pellet boilers. It can also be observed that the CO-emissions decrease as the load range increases. TSP-emissions vary from 0.004 to 0.460 lb/MMBtu; the average is approximately 0.052 lb/MMBtu. Emissions in the largest load range (> 680 MBtu/h) are significantly higher,which can be attributed to the small amount of appliance data. Overall, the TSPemissions are slightly higher than the TSP-emissions for solid wood boilers, which may be due to the characteristics of the fuel as wood chips have more fine parts and are more inhomogeneous than pellets.
The NO X -emissions fall into the range of 50 to 440 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 ; the average value is approximately 150 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . This value is slightly higher than the NO X emissions from pellets and solid wood stoves, which can be attributed to the characteristics of wood chips (bark).6-12 Table 6-10 overview of extreme and averaged values from TOP 25% performing wood chip boilers

< 100 100 - 200 200 - 340 340 - 680 > 680 35 65 44 39 30 26 49 42 33 26 7 12 11 8 7 min. 51 102 205 342 751 max. 96 171 340 666 2220 avg. 78 147 276 449 1322 min. 73 75 77 77 76 max. 78 81 80 86 79 avg. 76 79 78 80 78 min. 28 10 7 9 15 max. 108 93 87 40 68 avg. 60 39 30 22 34 min. 0.017 0.009 0.020 0.009 0.053 max. 0.110 0.053 0.075 0.072 0.156 avg. 0.046 0.027 0.038 0.042 0.092 min. 91 90 106 45 90 max. 185 179 180 180 178 avg. 157 134 138 125 131 14350 25504 31581 34056 65180 nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%)

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu)

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$)

load range (MBtu/h) No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) The TOP 25% performing wood chip boilers reach efficiencies of approximately 78%, which is 1% higher than the average emissions of the entire data set. In comparison to the CO emissions of the entire data set, decreases of 50 – 70% can be observed in that the average CO emissions are very low at approximately 35 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . Dust emissions are approximately 20% lower than the emissions of the entire data set. The average dust emissions are approximately 0.040 lb/MMBtu/h. Detailed performance data of the TOP 25% pe rforming wood chip boilers is given in the

annex.


### 6.3.4 Combined technologies

Table 6-11 shows a summary of the minimum, maximum and average efficiency- and emission values at full load of all considered combined technology boilers (pellets & solid wood) and Table 6-12 shows test data of the TOP 25% performing appliances at the defined load ranges. A total of 29 data sets were recorded, of which 22 were not identical.6-13 Table 6-11 overview of extreme and average values from all considered combined technology boilers (pellets & solid wood)
pellets solid wood

min. 51 51 max. 205 205 avg. 80 92 min. 79 72 max. 89 87 avg. 84 80 min. 1 158 max. 294 1384 avg. 109 367 min. 0.008 0.021 max. 0.139 0.079 avg. 0.036 0.035 min. 92 96 max. 218 174 avg. 131 135 fuel No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$) nominal load

(MBtu/h)

GCV 1) at full load (%)

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu)

15675 29 22 6

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) Combined boilers are built in load ranges from 50 to 200 MBtu/h. For pellet mode and solid wood mode, average efficiencies of 84% and 80% respectively are achieved. CO emissions in pellet mode are approximately 110 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 , meaning that CO emissions are similar to the emissions from pellet boilers. In solid wood mode, CO emissions are approximately 370 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . These emissions are comparable to emissions from solid wood boilers. Dust emissions range from 0.010 to 0.140 lb/MMBtu and are approximately 0.036 lb/MMBtu on average. These values also co rrespond closely with emission data from pellets and solid wood boilers. NOx emissions are approximately 130 mg/m3 at 12% O 2, which can be considered normal NO X -emissions for wood fuel.6-1 4 Table 6-12 overview of extreme and averag e values from TOP 25% performing combined technology boilers (pellets & solid wood)
pellets solid wood 29 22

6 min. 51 51 max. 126 153 avg. 75 88 min. 79 72 max. 84 83 avg. 82 79 min. 6 158 max. 104 530 avg. 34 252 min. 0.017 0.023 max. 0.040 0.038 avg. 0.027 0.027 min. 92 96 max. 218 150 avg. 145 120 16870 nominal load

(MBtu/h) fuel No. of all test data No. of unequal test data No. of top 25% appliances

GCV 1) at full load (%)

CO at full load (mg/m 3 12%O2 )

TSP 1) at full load (lb/MMBtu)

NOx at full load

(mg/m3 12%O2 ) avg. retail price (US$)

1) related to the Gross Calorific Value (upper heating value) The emissions and efficiencies of the TOP 25% performing appliances correspond to the increase of efficiency and decrease of CO and TSP emissions as discussed for the pellets and solid wood boilers. Detailed performance data of all combined technology boilers is given in the annex.


### 6.3.5 Summary

In Figure 6-1 and 6-2 the deviations of the average efficiencies and dust emissions of the TOP 25% performing appliances from the requirements given in EN 303-5 are summarized. The efficiency requirements in EN 303-5 are illustrated in Figure 5-1 and the dust emission limits are shown in Figure 6-2 Figure 6-1 and Figure 6-2 clearly show that the average performance of the TOP 25% performing appliances identified in this report greatly exceed the efficiency requirements and are mostly below the dust emission limits of class 5 from EN 303-5 (currently still under discussion and has not yet been introduced). At present, class 3 represents the most stringent requirements for biomass boilers.6-15 75% 80% 85% 90%

0 200 400 600 800 1000 nominal load in mBTU/h class 3 class 4 class 5efficiency based on GCV TOP 25% pellet boilers

Figure 6-1 average efficiency performance of TOP 25% pellet boilers in comparison to efficiency requirements of EN 303-5, class 3 and future efficiency requirements of EN303-5, class 4 and 5

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30

Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 solid wood pellets wood chipsdust emission limits in lb/MMBtu

0.000 0.050 0.100 0.150 0.200

0 200 400 600 800 1000 nominal load in mBTU/h class 3

class 4 class 5

TOP 25% pellet boilers class 2dust emissions in lb/MMBtu

Figure 6-2 dust emission limits for solid wood, wood chips and pellet boilers of EN 303-5, classes 1 to 5 and average dust emissions of the TOP 25% performing boilers. Figure 6-3 shows the efficiencies from the TOP 25% performing boilers for nominal and partial loads. For pellet and wood chips boilers partial load equals 30% of nominal load, for solid wood boilers partial load is 50% of nominal load.6-16 75% 80% 85% 90%< 5555 - 100100 - 170170 - 340> 340< 8585 - 120120 - 170> 170< 100100 - 200200 - 340340 - 680> 680

pellet boilers solid wood boilers wood chip boilers nominal load partial loadefficiency based on GCV

load category (MBtu/h)

Figure 6-3 average efficiencies based on GCV at nominal and partial heat load for the TOP 25% performing boilers Efficiencies that are reached at nominal and partial load are nearly identical, solid wood and wood chip appliances sometimes even reach higher efficiencies at partial load.



## 6.4 Commercial biomass installations

Medium to large scale commercial biomass installations undergo individual commissioning, meaning that these plants are dimensioned and built individually with respect to the technical requirements of the buyer. Commisioning is performed in order to guarantee that the emission and efficiency requirements are met. Depending on the local regulations, emissions and efficiencies have to be controlled periodically by consulting engineers. Results of these measurements are usually not published; therefore, no database on emissions and efficiencies of medium commercial biomass appliances is available. In order to give an idea of emissions and efficiencies of medium scale biomass plants, results from various studies on this topic will be cited in this section. In addition, national emission factors for biomass combustion units shall show which average emissions are assumed for the Austrian biomass plants.


### 6.4.1 Data collection of Austrian medium scale biomass appliances (Musil et al. 2006)

Emission data for Austrian biomass combustion and CHP plants was collected directly from the operators of medium scale biomass units using a standard questionnaire. In addition, the measurement results of one co nsulting engineer were used for the estimation of emissions from medium scale biomass appliances. Approximately 100 data sets in total were collected, all appliances were operated with wood chips, saw shavings or wood residues. In Figure 6- the average emission results for TSP and NO X assigned in three load ranges are shown.6-17 163 180

148

76 82

33

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200

 3.4 mmBTU/h 3.4 - 6.8 mmBTU/h 6.8 - 17.1 mmBTU/h

nominal heat load NOx TSP sd.: 79

sd.: 40 sd.: 92

sd.: 31 sd.: 33 sd.: standard deviationemissions in mg/m313%O2

sd.: 33

Figure 6-4 TSP and NOx emissions of medium scale biomass appliances in Austria

While the NO X emissions were quite constant for these load categories (from 170 – 205 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 ), dust emissions decreased signifi cantly with increasing load because of stricter emission limits for loads from 6.9 MMBtu/h. Up to a load range of 6.8 MMBtu/h, TSP emissions were found to be around 80 mg/m3 at 13% O 2 (0.150 lb/MMBtu), TSP emissions for higher loads are around 35 mg/m3 at 13% O 2 (0.065 lb/MMBtu). Figure 6- shows the TSP emissions and the emission limits of the analysed biomass appl iances in more detail including the utilized emission control technology.6-18 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

1 2 35 1 35 2 3 45

 3.4 mmBTU/h 3.4 - 6.8 mmBTU/h 6.8 - 17.1 mmBTU/hTSP in mg/m3@ 13% O2

technology:

heat load:

blue dots: emission limits for the appliance technology 1: cyclone technology 2: cyclone + electrostatic precipitator technology 3: cyclone + flue gas condensation technology 4: cyclone + flue gas condensation + electrostatic precipitator technology 5: electrostatic precipitator Figure 6-5 dust emissions and emission limits of Austrian medium scale biomass appliances (Musil et al. 2006) For appliances of up to 6.8 MMBtu/h, cyclones are the most commonly used emission control technology. This is due to the relatively high emission limits of 150 mg/m at 13% O 2 (0.275 lb/MMBtu) in comparison to emission limits for combustion units 6.8 MMBtu/h (50 mg/m3 at 13% O 2 and 0.090 lb/MMBtu). Next to cyclones, electrostatic precipitators combined with cyclones are the second most common. No bag-house filters were used for appliances of this load range.


### 6.4.2 Data collection of Swiss automated biomass appliances (Hasler et al. 2000)

In a large data survey, approximately 1000 measurement results of 250 biomass appliances installed in Switzerland were collected and analyzed. Untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b), wood residues (LRV Kat. c) and urban waste wood (Altholz) were used. For comparison, a small number of data from solid wood appliances (LRV Kat. a) were also considered. Figure 6- shows the number of the considered wood chip appliances by heat load and fuel category.6-19 Figure 6-6 number of considered wood chip boilers by heat load and fuel category from 100 to 2000 kW (340-6820 MBtu/h); fuels: untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b), wood residues (LRV Kat. c) and urban waste wood (Altholz) how to read the graph: the first range of values (1 st field of the X-axis) includes all appliances in the range from 0 to 100 kW (0-340 MBtu/h) (Hasler et al. 2000) Figure 6-
 shows the CO emissions and the excess air ratio of the considered boilers with

un treated wood chips fuel (LRV Kat. b).

Figure 6-7 CO emissions in mg/m3 at 11%O2 and the excess air ratio of the considered boilers with untreated wood chips fuel (LRV Kat. a) (Hasler et al. 2000) How to read the graph: the first range of values (1 st field of the X-axis) includes all measurement points in the range from 0 to 100 mg/m3 at 11%O 2 (0 to 90mg/m 3 at 12%O 2 ) respectively 0 to 1.2 Two thirds of the considered appliances have CO emissions < 250 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 (225 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 ); CO emissions > 1000 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 (900 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 ) are only measured in appliances with heat loads below 500 kW (1706 MBtu/h). The excess air ratio shows broad variations from 1.2 <  < 5. Most of the appliances reach excess air ratios between 1.8 and 2.4 and ab out one third of the appliances are operated with excess air ratios > 2.4. Figure 6- shows the NO X emissions of all considered wood chip appliances (untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b), wood residues (LRV Kat. c) and urban waste wood (Altholz)).6-20 Figure 6-8 NO X -emissions from wood chip appliances (fuels: untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b), wood residues (LRV Kat. c) and urban waste wood (Altholz)) (Hasler et al. 2000) How to read the graph: the first range of values (1 st field of the X-axis) includes NO X emissions in the range from 0 to 50 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 (45 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 )
NO X emissions from untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b) exhibit a nearly Gaussian distribution in the range from 100 to 400 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 . For urban waste wood, NO X emissions fall into a similar range. NO X emissions from wood residues (LRV Kat. c) fall into a broader range of up to 850 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 due to higher N contents in some wood residues appliances. Figure 6- shows the TSP/dust emissions of wood chip appliances (untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b), wood residues (LRV Kat. c) and of solid wood appliances (LRV Kat. a)).

Figure 6-9 TSP/dust emissions from wood chips and solid wood appliances (fuels: solid wood (LRV Kat. a) untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b), wood residues (LRV Kat. c)) How to read the graph: the first range of values (1 st field of the X-axis) includes dust emissions in the range from 0 to 25 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 (0-0.030 lb/MMBtu for solid wood and 0-0.037 lb/MMBtu) (Hasler et al. 2000) For all solid wood appliances (LRV Kat. a) the dust emissions are below 150 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 (0.185 lb/MMBtu); most dust loads are in the range from 25 to 50 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 (0.030 – 0.060 lb/MMBtu). For untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b) and wood6-21 residues (LRV Kat. c) the averaged dust emissions are between 100 and 150 mg/m3 at 11% O 2 (0.150- 0.220 lb/MMBtu).



### 6.4.3 Emission factors

While measurement results of emissions are related to the input load, emission factors are related to the annual energy use. Therefore a direct conversion from emissions to emission factors is not possible.
Emission factors are used to calculate the national annual overall emissions of CO 2 , CO, NO X and other pollutants. Calculation methods for emission factors vary from country to country and depend strongly on the available data sources. Emission factors are supposed to represent the average annual emissions of the conside red appliance type, including start and stop emissions as well as summer and winter operation modes. Emission factors are derived as a function of plant size and fuel type and are combined in different classes which differ from country to country. To calculate the annual overall emissions, the shares of the diverse emission classes in the total energy consumption has to be determined. In order to estimate nationwide emissions of diverse facilities, emission factors are specified for diverse facilities and fuels. Each country identifies emission categories on its own, which means that emissions from biomass combustion units are often mixed with emissions from other combustion units.

Table - shows emission factors from Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Table 6-13 Austrian, Germ an and Swiss emission factors

CO (lb/MMBtu) TSP (lb/MMBtu) NO X (lb/MMBtu) A USTRIA ( SOURCE : B OEHMER ET AL . 2007) biomass district heating/CHP facilities < 170 MMBtu/h wood chips including bark and wood residues 0.115 0.050 0.215

G ERMANY ( SOURCE : S TRUSCHKA ET AL . 2008) manual boilers > 170 MBtu/h 1.400 0.145 0.200 pellet boilers > 170 MBtu/h 0.255 0.075 0.230 wood chip boilers > 170 MBtu/h 2.305 0.150 0.370 S WITZERLAND ( SOURCE : H ASLER ET AL . 2000) solid wood (LRV Kat. a) 0.105 0.235 untreated wood chips (LRV Kat. b) 0.205 0.375 wood residues (LRV Kat. c) 0.215 0.665 urban waste wood (Altholz) 0.005 0.4856-22 Table 6- clearly shows that each country looks at different combustion systems and fuel categories in order to calculate the national emission factors. Therefore, the comparability of these emission factors is limited. CO emissions vary from 0.100 to 2.300 lb/MMBtu. While wood chip appliances are considered to reach low CO emissions in the Austrian study, very high emissions are considered in the German study. Except for the Swiss emission factors for urban waste wood (0.005 lb/MMBtu), TSP emissions vary from 0.050 to 0.220 lb/MMBtu. Since TSP emissions depend on the emission control system installed, this variation seems reasonable due to different TSP control concepts and/or limits. For medium scale biomass appliances, emission controls for NO X are usually not installed. Since NO X emissions result primarily from nitrogen in the fuel and the fuel quality is quite constant, NO X emission factors should be very similar. This is true for the emission factors shown in Table 6-13 where NO X emission factors are within the range of 0.200 to 0.375 lb/MMBtu. Since wood residues and urban waste wood usually contain more nitrogen than the other biomass fuels, NO X emissions are thus higher for these appliances.


### 6.4.4 Summary

In two studies, emission data from medium scale biomass appliances were collected and analysed, whereby an emphasis was placed on NO X and dust emissions. In the Austrian study (Musil et al. 2006), biomass district heating/CHP facilities with heat loads of up to 17 MMBtu/h were analysed, while the Swiss study (Hasler et al. 2000) considered all sizes of biomass appliances from residential stoves up to 17 MMBtu/h. In addition, emission factors are presented for Austria (Boehmer et al. 2007), Germany (Struschka et al. 2008) and Switzerland (Hasler et al. 2000). Since emission factors are based on the annual heat demand, they cannot be directly compared with measured average emission values. CO emissions were only analysed in the study from Hasler et al. 2000. It was shown that two thirds of the appliances emit CO < 225 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 . Emission factors for CO show very broad variations from 0.100 to 2.300 lb/MMBtu ( 70 to 1400 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 ). While the Austrian study shows averaged dust emissions (the following values are based on those for pellets) of about 0.097 lb/MMBtu for appliances < 6830 Btu/h and about 0.060 lb/MMBtu for appliances > 6830 Btu/h, the Swiss study results in averaged dust emissions of 0.150 – 0.200 lb/MMBtu for all fuels. Emission factors for dust vary from 0.050 to 0.220 lb/MMBtu. Since dust emissions depend greatly on the installed emission control technology, variations of these emissions may be attributed to different technologies. Average NO X emissions that were given in the studies vary from 150 to 220 mg/m3 for untreated wood. For wood residues the NO X emissions can be higher due to a higher nitrogen content of the wood fuel. Also the emission factors for NO X show high correlation. They are in a range from 0.200 to 0.375 lb/MMBtu ( 120 to 230 mg/m3 at 12% O 2 ) for untreated wood. For urban waste wood and wood residues, higher emission factors were fixed because of the higher nitrogen content of these fuels.7-1 

# 7 Emission control technologies

For biomass appliances, emission control technologies usually aim at the reduction of CO, OGC, dust and NO X emissions. Two different concepts for emission reduction, both primary and secondary measures have to be considered. While primary measures are implemented in the combustion process and/or design of the combustion chamber, secondary measures are implemented after combustion process has ended, mostly adjacent to the boiler. Table 7-1 gives a summary indicating what reductions measures are available for small and medium to large scale biomass appliances. Table 7-1 overview of primary and secondary emission control technologies for biomass appliances
scale smal l medium to large measures primary secondary primary secondary CO/OGC X - X - PM/dust X X X X NO X - - X X 1)

1) in biomass appliances NO X emissions are usually below the limit by primary measures 

## 7.1 Emission control technology for PM/dust

Secondary measures for emission control in biomass appliances usually aim at the reduction of dust emissions. CO/OGC and NO X emissions are reduced below the limits by primary measures, as was shown above.


### 7.1.1 Small scale appliances

Due to stricter dust emission limits for small scale appliances, special solutions for dust reduction in this load range were recently developed. These developments were mostly performed by small companies (business start-ups) and manufacturers of small scale appliances, who were aware of this need. Small scale dust emission control is based on the technology of scrubbers and electrostatic precipitators. For heat loads > 650 MBtu/h, baghouse filter systems were also developed. Scrubber systems are always combined with flue gas condensation. Table 7-2 gives an overview of commercially available secondary dust reduction technology for small scale appliances.7-2 Table 7-2 commercial small scale dust control technologies (summarised from Bischof 2008)

name heat load in MBtu/h efficiency

in % life time in years market launch sold systems price in US$ producer

S CRUBBER / CONDENSATION Hydrocube 50 – 3400 70 15 - 20 2007 250 7400 Schraeder Abgastechnologie Power Condenser 85 75 1) 20 2008 20 2500 Powerkondens AG 170 3700

Carbonizer 75 - 1700 86 > 20 2003 500 2100 2) Bschor GmbH 7400 3)

Profitherm 50 - 500 50 > 20 - - 3400 4) BOMAT Heiztechnik GmbH 6600 3)
E LECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR
Zumik®on 
 120 60 - 90 15 - 20 2006 > 140 1600 Rueegg Cheminée AG

Trion 120 90 15-20 2005 300 - 400 1500 - 3000 5) Trion Luftfiltersysteme GmbH 170 12000 OekoTube 
 240 90 15 2008 0 2000 OekoSolve AG Airbox 
 50 > 60 - 2008 10 2100 Spartherm B AGHOUSE FILTERKeramikfilter > 680 99 15 - 20 - - - Herding GmbH Filtertechnik Koeb Winkel 680 - 2000 < 10 mg/m3 - - - - Koeb & Schaefer GmbH

1) 50 without scrubber (condensing only) 2) 75 MBtu/h 3) 340 MBtu/h 4) 70 MBtu/h 5) depends on length

As Table 7-2 shows, dust removal technologies for small scale appliances were not introduced to the market before 2003. Furthermore, the number of systems sold shows that this is a very young technology. A large number of prototypes are currently being tested. Scrubbers with flue gas condensing and electrostatic precipitators are available for very small heat loads. In general, electrostati c precipitators are less expensive and reach higher efficiencies. While for scrubber technol ogy low return temperatures of about 85 °F are necessary for flue gas condensation, electrostatic precipitators have a maximum energy demand of 100 Btu/h (Bischof 2008).


### 7.1.2 Medium scale appliances

For medium to large scale appliances, industrial solutions for emission control are used. These technologies are usually produced by plant or system manufacturers who are either specialists of flue gas cleaning technology or build complete (energy) plants. Emission control technologies for medium and large scale appliances are individually fit to the design data of the biomass appliance.7-3 For medium scale biomass appliances the cyclones for dust removal are usually built by the boiler manufacturers themselves. Table 7-3 shows important European manufacturers of dust emission control technologies for medium scale biomass appliances including their special fields. Table 7-3 European manufacturers for dust control technologies for medium scale biomass appliances( Brunner 2009, Lundgren 2009, Oravainen 2009)

company cyclone scrubber electrostatic precipitator baghouse filter Beth X X Scheuch GmbH X X X X VAS - Verfahrenstechnik & Anlagensysteme X

JM Stoftteknik AB X X Jaernforsen Energi System AB X Dust Control Systems Oy X X

Table 7-4 an overview of prices for the dust removal technologies is given.

Table 7-4 prices for medium to large scale dust control technologies (FNR 2005) technology heat load in MMBtu/h costs in US$/MBtu/h
multicyclone 0.3 – 1.7 7 – 11 1.7 – 6.8 4 – 7 baghouse filters or electrostatic precipitators 3.4 – 6.8 20 - 30 6.8 - 1 7 15 - 22 17 - 68 9 - 18 flue gas condensation 3.4 - 1 7 20 - 308-1 

# 8 European Biomass Fuel Requirements

8.1 General remarks

The development of solid bio-fuel standards in Europe is linked to the beginning of wood pellet production, which started in Sweden in the late 1980s. Other countries such as Finland, Denmark and Austria followed in the early 1990s. In order to gain a common understanding between the manufacturers and the users, codes of good practice, quality guidelines and later national standards have been developed. In Europe the first national standards on pellet quality we re developed in Sweden and Austria in 1998 – other countries followed. In general these fuel quality standards should:

• guarantee a common, official, national quality of a certain bio-fuel

• ensure legal compliance and security for all involved market participants by defining responsibilities and duties

• help to avoid problems at interface-points along the supply chain by defining quality standards and threshold values

• inform the consumers about quality characteristics and therefore support the dissemination of a new biomass fuel to the market. In addition to the national efforts, the development of quality guidelines was also pushed on the European level. The Technical Committee 335 (TC335) of the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) developed the European standards CEN/TC 14558:2003 Solid bio-fuels – Terminology, definitions and descriptions as well as CEN/TC 14961:2005 Solid bio-fuels – Fuel specifications and classes that allow a differentiation of terminologically defined solid bio-fuels by means of defined parameters. Additionally, a series of technical standards dealing with determination methods of specific fuel properties or sampling methods have been worked out by the TC335. Table 8-1 lists all standards developed by this technical committee. Moreover, national standards for wood pellets logistics and storage have been developed. The definition of quality parameters for logistics and storage was also found to be important so as to avoid any problems along the su pply chain. Furthermore, the end-user should have a clear guideline of how to ensure product quality and user safety during the storage of bio-fuels.8-2 Table 8-1 List of standards developed by CEN/TC 335

S TANDARD REFERENCE T ITLE CEN/TS 14588:2004 Solid bio-fuels - Terminology, definitions and descriptions
CEN/TS 14774-1:2004 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for determination of moisture content - Oven dry method - Part 1: Total moisture - Reference method

CEN/TS 14774-2:2004 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the determination of moisture content - Oven dry method - Part 2: Total moisture - Simplified method

CEN/TS 14774-3:2004 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the determination of moisture content - Oven dry method - Part 3: Moisture in general analysis sample CEN/TS 14775:2004 Solid bio-fuels - Method for the determination of ash content CEN/TS 14778-1:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Sampling - Part 1: Methods for sampling
CEN/TS 14778-2:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Sampling - Part 2: Methods for sampling particulate material transported in lorries
CEN/TS 14779:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Sampling - Methods for preparing sampling plans and sampling certificates CEN/TS 14780:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for sample preparation CEN/TS 14918:2005 Solid Bio-fuels - Method for the determination of calorific value CEN/TS 14961:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Fuel specifications and classes CEN/TS 15103:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the determination of bulk density
CEN/TS 15104:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Determination of total content of carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen - Instrumental methods
CEN/TS 15105:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for determination of the water soluble content of chloride, sodium and potassium
CEN/TS 15148:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Method for the determination of the content of volatile matter

CEN/TS 15149-1:2006 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the det ermination of particle size distribution - Part 1: Oscillating screen method using sieve apertures of 3,15 mm and above

CEN/TS 15149-2:2006 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the det ermination of particle size distribution - Part 2: Vibrating screen method using sieve apertures of 3.15 mm and below
CEN/TS 15149-3:2006 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the det ermination of particle size distribution - Part 3: Rotary screen method
CEN/TS 15150:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the determination of particle density
CEN/TS 15210-1:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the determination of mechanical durability of pellets and briquettes - Part 1: Pellets
CEN/TS 15210-2:2005 Solid bio-fuels - Methods for the determination of mechanical durability of pellets and briquettes - Part 2: Briquettes CEN/TS 15234:2006 Solid bio-fuels - Fuel quality assurance
CEN/TS 15289:2006 Solid Bio-fuels - Determination of total content of sulphur and chlorine CEN/TS 15290:2006 Solid Bio-fuels - Determination of major elements CEN/TS 15296:2006 Solid Bio-fuels - Calculation of analyses to different bases CEN/TS 15297:2006 Solid Bio-fuels - Determination of minor elements8-3 S TANDARD REFERENCE T ITLE CEN/TS 15370-1:2006 Solid Bio-fuels - Method for the determination of ash melting behavior - Part 1: Characteristic temperatures method 

## 8.2 European Bio-fuel standards

The technical standard EN14961 from 2005 defines the fuel quality classes and specifications for solid bio-fuels originating from the following sources:

• Products from agriculture and forestry,

• Vegetable waste from agriculture and forestry

• Vegetable waste from the food processing industry,

• Wood waste, with the exception of wood waste that may contain halogenated organic compounds or heavy metals as a result of treatment with wood preservatives or coatings

• Waste originated from construction and demolition waste

• Fibrous vegetable waste from virgin pulp production and from production of paper from pulp, if it is co-incinerated at the place of production and heat generated is recovered.

• Cork waste NOTE: Demolition wood is not included in the scope of this standard. Demolition wood is defined as “used wood arising from demolition of buildings or civil engineering installations” (CEN/TS 14588).


### 8.2.1 Origin of Bio-fuels

The first step in the classification of solid bio-fuels according to En14961 is based on the bio-fuel origin and source. In the hierarchical classification system, the main origin-based solid bio-fuel groups are:

• Woody biomass

• Herbaceous biomass

• Fruit biomass

• Blends and mixtures Each group has several subdivisions to allow for a more detailed specification.


### 8.2.2 Specification of solid bio-fuels based on traded forms and properties

Solid bio-fuels are traded in many different forms (sizes and shapes). The European standard EN14961:2005 distinguishes between solid bio-fuel trading forms, listed in Table 8-2.8- 4 Table 8-2 Trading forms of solid bio-fuels and their preparation methods according to EN14961:2005.

F UEL NAME T YPICAL PARTICLE SIZE C OMMON PREPARATION METHOD Briquettes Ø>25 mm Mechanical compression Pellets Ø<25 mm Mechanical compression Fuel powder <1 mm Milling Sawdust 1 – 5 mm Cutting with sharp tools Wood chips 5 – 100 mm Cutting with sharp tools Hog fuel Varying Crushing with blunt tools Logs 100 – 1000 mm Cutting with sharp tools Whole wood >500 mm Cutting with sharp tools Small straw bales Big straw bales Round straw bales 0.1 m3 3.7 m3 2.1 m3 Compressed and bound to squares Compressed and bound to squares Compressed and bound to cylinders Bundle Varying Lengthways oriented & bound Bark Varying Debarking residue from trees Can be shredded or unshredded Chopped straw 10 – 200 mm Chopped during harvesting Grain or seed Varying No preparation or drying Shells and fruit stones 5 – 15 mm No preparation
Fiber cake Varying Prepared from fibrous waste by dewatering The specifications of properties of these different forms are given in the annex.



### 8.2.3 Revision of EN14961:2005

Currently the EN14961 is under revision. The revised standard will not only define the specification of properties of solid bio-fuels, but also include definite properties such as threshold values for different quality classes. The main intention of this step is to simplify the acquisition of appropriate fuels for end users. To cover all kinds of solid biomass fuels as well as industrial fuels with lower quality requirements, a general section (part 1 of the revised EN14961) will be included in the revised standard. The structure of prEN 14961-part 1 is very similar to the first version of the standard from 2005 (see chapter 0): EN14961-1: Scope and general requirements of solid bio-fuels
Parts 2 – 6 of the new standard will define fuel quality classes and specifications explicitly for non-industrial bio-fuels:8-5 • EN14961-2: Fuel quality classes and specifications of wood pellets

• EN14961-3: Fuel quality classes and specifications of wood briquettes

• EN14961-4: Fuel quality classes and specifications of wood chips

• EN14961-5: Fuel quality classes and specifications for firewood

• EN14961-6: Fuel quality classes and specifications of non-woody pellets 

## 8.3 European countries with national pellet standards

As previously mentioned, some European countries developed national quality standards for solid bio-fuels – mainly for wood pellets – long before a European standard was available. Some of these national standards do not only regulate the declaration of solid bio-fuels as the existing European standard EN14961:2005, but set definite specifications of properties (e.g. threshold values for contaminants) for high quality fuels. If the revised European Standard for solid bio-fuels is implemented, the national standards will be discarded.



### 8.3.1 Austria

In Austria, three standards referring to pellets product quality, logistic quality and storage quality are available:

• OeNORM M 7135 - Compressed wood in natural state or bark in natural state – pellets and briquettes - requirements and test specifications

• OeNORM M 7136 - Compressed wood in natural state - Wood pellets quality assurance in the field of logistics of transport and storage

• OeNORM M 7137 - Compressed wood in natural state - Wood pellets – Requirements on pellets storage at the end-consumer

8.3.1.1 OeNORM M 7135

This product standard covers wood pellets as well as briquettes. Pellets or briquettes must be made of virgin wood; up to 2 % of natural binding agents are allowed. Physical and chemical property requirements for the highest quality class are listed in Table 8-3. The process of quality management includes internal and external audits. Manufacturers must perform internal quality assurance continuously, at least once a week by testing abrasion, water content, unit density and pressing aids. External audits include an initial inspection of the production plant and the sampling for laboratory tests, the control of the internal quality assurance system as well as the control of the labeling. Periodic, unannounced supervision is done once a year.

8.3.1.2 OeNORM M 7136
In order to assure the quality of wood pellets produced according to OeNORM M 7135 during transport and storage, certain requirements are specified under the OeNORM M 7136. Specifications encompass transportation and temporary storage. These specifications are intended to assist pellet manufacturers, haule rs and traders in avoiding mistakes to ensure customer satisfaction along the logistic chain.8-6 8.3.1.3 OeNORM M 7137
This standard refers to the storage of wood pellets produced according to OeNORM M 7135. It defines specifications and requiremen ts of wood pellet storage for the end user. The standard addresses the end users of wood pellets as well as the manufacturers of pellets storage units.


### 8.3.2 Germany

In Germany there exist two standards, DIN 51731 for common pellets and briquettes and Din plus with higher requirements, especially for the use in automatically stoked pellet boilers.

8.3.2.1 DIN 51731

The German standard defines the physical and chemical property requirements such as shape, unit density and the chemical compositio n of wood pellets. Specifications of the highest pellet quality class according to DIN 51731 are listed in Table 8-3.

8.3.2.2 DIN plus Standard

The DIN plus certification programme is used for high quality pellets intended for use in small scale household appliances. The s pecifications are mainly based on the Austrian standard OeNORM M7135, extended by the threshold requirements for minor elements from the DIN 51731. External auditing is performed once a year and is unannounced. Specifications of the DIN plus pellet quality label are listed in Table 8-3.

8.3.2.3 Certification of pellet logistics

“DIN-Gepruefter Fachbetrieb – Pelletlogistik” (DIN tested qualified enterprise pellet logistics) monitors the transport to the end-customer. The test criteria for suppliers include specifications for the storage depot, employees, internal and external monitoring and transport vehicles. The requirements are very similar to the Austrian standard OeNORM M 7136. DIN CERTCO developed a new standard for the storage of pellets for end consumers based on the Austrian standard OeNORM M7137: “DIN gepruefte Pelletlagerung” (“DIN certified pellet storage”).



### 8.3.3 Sweden

The Swedish standard SS187120: “Bio-fuels and peat—Fuel pellets—Classification” for wood pellets specifies properties and thresh old values for three different wood pellet quality classes. Specifications are listed in Table 8-3.


### 8.3.4 Italy

The Italian standard for solid bio-fuel CTI - R 04/5 was published in March 2004 and specifies the requirements for biopellets for energetic purposes and is related to the technical specification defined by CEN/TC335 (EN14961:2005).8-7 This standard classifies four categories of pellets and includes the origin of the raw material. Categories A1 and A2 (with / without additives) determine the fuel quality classes and specifications for pellets originating from virgin wood, by-products and residues from the wood processing industry as well as chemically untreated used wood. Categories B and C encompass non-woody pellets produced from herbaceous biomass, fruit biomass and biomass blends and mixtures. Specifications of the CTI - R 04/5 are listed in Table 8-3.


### 8.3.5 United Kingdom

The Department of Trade and Industry of the UK published “Codes of Good Practice” for Bio-fuel pellets. These codes were adopted by British BioGen members as a standard for products and services. The Codes of good practice will be superseded by the European standards for solid bio-fuels once they are published. Specifications of the British code are listed in Table 8-3. 

## 8.4 Additional environmental or quality labels

In addition to the official national standards, additional environmental or quality labels for pellets have been published. In some countries these quality labels act as a substitute for the lack of a national standard, while in others they function as a supplement to the national standard indicating the best a vailable product quality or special ecological products. Figure 8-1 shows logos of environmental and quality labels for solid bio-fuels.

Figure 8-1: Environmental labels for solid bio-fuels Austria – “Umweltzeichen (Environmental Label)”: The Federal Ministry for the Environment has devised a special environment label for biomass fuels, where only raw materials from natural wood are allowed. Nordic Ecolabeling – “Nordic Swan”: The Swan-labeling of pellets includes requirementson manufacturing methods, transportation and storage. The aim is to identify the topgrade quality from an environmental perspective. The quality of the pellets shall mean that they are easy to use and thus meet th e end-users’ wishes when converting to a renewable energy source that reduces the emission of greenhouse gases. In addition, the energy required to manufacture the pellets is limited to ensure the energy efficiency. Finally, the combustion shall not entail a health or environmental risk. Specifications of “Swan labeled” pellets are summarized in Table 8-3.8-8 Italy – “Pellet Gold” ( Pelletgold 2009 ): is the highest Italian wood fuel quality standard. The certification system is based on clear operation rules to determine that the product satisfies the requirement indicated in the reference documents. The requirements of Pellet Gold are based on CEN/TS 14961, DINplus, OeNORM M 7135 and the limits introduced by the American Pellet Fuels Institute (PFI). An additional element in the Pellet Gold standard which is not present in other European certification systems was introduced by AIEL (Associazione Italiana Energie Agroforestali): the Formaldehyde content (HCHO) which is fundamental to verify the presence of health hazardous materials such as glue and varnish (see Table 8-3).8-98.5 Summary of European and national property specifications for bio-fuelsTable 8-3 Comparison of European and national wood pellet/briquette standards and environmental labelsAUSTRIAEU GERMANYGREATBRITAINITALYSWEDEN

Property class Unit OeNORM M 7135 EN 14961:2005 Best pellet categories prEN 14961-2 A1-class DIN 51731 DIN plus BioGen - Code of good practice CTI – R 04/5 Pellet Gold SS 187120 Nordic Ecolabelling – Swan LabelDiameter, D andLength, Lin0.16 
 D0.39D06 0.24± 0.02D06 0.24± 0.040.16 
 D0.390.16 
 D0.39D 0.16 –0.79D 0.24 –0.31-D -L 
 4D0.24 ±0.02Moisture, Mas received,w-%10 M10 
10 M10 
10 
 12 
 10 
 10 
 10 
 10 
 10 
 10Ash, a w-% dry 
 0.5A0.70.7A0.50.5A0.70.71.5 
 0.5 
 1.0 
 0.7 
 1.0 
 0.7 
 0.5Mechanicaldurability, DU orabrasion (100 –DU)as received,w-%97.7DU97.597.5DU97.597.5-  97.7 -  97.7  97.7 -  97.5Fines at factorygate in bulktransportFines in smallbags at factorygate (at packing)Fines in smallw-% -F1.01.0F1.01.0F0.50.5- - 
 0.5 - - 
 0.8 
 1.08-10AUSTRIAEU GERMANYGREATBRITAINITALYSWEDENbags (at deliveryto end-user)F1.01.0Additives w-% 
 2Type andamountto bestatedType andamountto bestatednone 
 2 - none 
 2Type andamountto bestated-Net calorificvalue, Qas received,MBtu/lb7.74 -Q16.57.107.53 –8.397.74  7.27  7.27  7.27  7.27  7.35Gross density lb/oz  0.073 - -0.065 –0.0910.073 - -  0.075 - -Bulk density, BD 103·lb/oz - -BD60039.0- -  39.040.3-746.839.0 39.0D6: 39.0-45.5D8: 45.5-50.7Nitrogen, N w-% dry 
 0.3N0.30.3N0.30.30.3 
 0.3 - 
 0.3 
 0.3 - 
 0.3Sulphur , S w-% dry 
 0.04 -S0.050.050.08 
 0.04 
 0.03 
 0.05 
 0.05 
 0.08 
 0.04Chlorine, Cl w-% dry 
 0.02Cl0.030.03Cl0.020.020.03 
 0.02 
 0.08 
 0.03 
 0.03 
 0.03 
 0.02Arsenic, As mg/kg dry - - 
 1 
 0.8 
 0.8 - - 
 0.8 - -Cadmium, Cd mg/kg dry - - 
 0.5 
 0.5 
 0.5 - - 
 0.5 - -Chromium, Cr mg/kg dry - - 
 10 
 8 
 8 - - 
 8 - -Copper, Cu mg/kg dry - - 
 10 
 5 
 5 - - 
 5 - -Lead, Pb mg/kg dry - - 
 10 
 10 
 10 - - 
 10 - -8-11AUSTRIAEU GERMANYGREATBRITAINITALYSWEDENMercury, Hg mg/kg dry - - 
 0.1 
 0.05 
 0.05 - - 
 0.05 - -Nickel, Ni mg/kg dry - - 
 10 - - - -- -Zinc, Zn mg/kg dry - - 
 100 
 100 
 100 - - 
 100 - -Sodium; Na w-% dry - - - - - - - 
 0.03 - -EOX (extract.org. halogens)mg/kg dry - - - 
 3 
 3 - 
 1 - - -Formaldehyde mg/100g dry - - - - - - - 
 1.5 - -Ash meltingbehavior, DToF - -DT1200>2190- - -Temperature to bestatedIT2370HT25509-1 

# 9 Heat storage (accumulator tank)

9.1 Introduction

Function An accumulator tank is a heat-insulated steel tank in which a heat carrier (mostly water) circulates when it is loaded. Temperature stratification results from the density difference between cold and hot water (cold water has a higher density than hot water). Hot water from the boiler is introduced into the buffer accumulator at the top. The design of the inlet ensures that turbulence is low and that the temperature stratification is not destroyed. High flow temperatures result in good temperature stratification and high heat storage capacity.

Types Different types of buffer accumulators are available depending on the use of the buffer accumulators as heat storage devices with or without integrated hot service water storage and/or integration of additional heating sources, e. g. solar energy (Figure 9-1).

Figure 9-1 Different types of buffer (adapted from FNR I 2007)
The capacity of the tank installations can be reduced when using a combined storage unit for heating and hot water. Major drawbacks are however the reduction of the volume of the buffer accumulator and energy losses in sum mer, when only hot water is needed.

Application area Although modern solid wood boilers are able to modulate their operation load from 100 to 50%, the use of heat storage is strongly recommended by manufacturers of the boilers, by R&D institutions and authorities. Pellet and wood chip boilers can even modulate their operation load from 100 to 30%. Nonetheless, some manufacturers recommend the integration of accumulator tanks in these heating systems as well in order to increase the annual efficiencies of the heating systems.9-2 The research field on annual efficiencies in residential homes is quite young in Europe; there are however some ongoing research activities. BE 2020+ for example is currently working on the development of a test stand method for the determination of system efficiency and emission factors of small-scale biomass combustion systems. 

## 9.2 Dimensioning

9.2.1 General aspects

The necessary volume of the accumulator tank is influenced by several factors:

• range of capacity of the boiler (only full load of variable heat load)

• volume of the fuel storage in the boiler (for manually stoked boilers)

• nominal heat load of the boiler

• calorific value and energy density of fuel

• effective temperature difference in the heat storage

• demand for convenience

In Table 9-1 the benefits and disadvantages of large and small heat storage vessels are summarized. Table 9-1 benefits and drawbacks of large and small heat storages (adapted from FNR III 2007) benefits disadvantagelarge heat storage(one fuel charge canbe accumulated) o boiler can always be operated at full load (low emission operation)

o reduction of combustion

intervals

o one combustion period with

maximum fuel charge covers heat demand for a couple of days in spring/autumn o high investment costs for large heat storage

o heat losses by accumulator tank

(even if tank is well insulated)small heatstorage o low investment costs o boiler will be operated in part load (which means higher emissions)

o emergency shut-downs may occur

if heat load of boiler is larger than heat demand (which results in very high emissions for a short time)

o reduction of boiler durability

In general, the dimensioning of the accumulator tank is an optimisation function of investment costs and boiler performance.9-3 

### 9.2.2 Sizing guidelines

For the sizing of heat storage vess el for solid wood boilers, many guidelines can be found in literature. These guidelines are related to the nominal heat load of the boiler and vary from approximately 10 to 30 l/MBtu/h and 2.7 to 7.9 gal/MBtu/h respectively (FNR II 2007, Struschka et al. 2004...). Struschka et al. 2004 analysed the emissions of solid wood boilers with heat loads of 100 MBtu/h that were operated with and without accumulator tanks in field tests. Table 9-2 and Figure 9-2 show the major results of this study. Table 9-2 average annual CO emission factors for solid wood boilers (adapted from Struschka et al. 2004) control concept: modulated nominal load only volume of heat storage average annual CO emissions in mg/MBtu 0 l 0 gal 4 384 4 384 750 l 200 gal 1 431 1 444 1 500 l 400 gal 1 110 1 003

Figure 9-2 development of CO and OGC emissions depending on the volume of the heat storage Heat storage vessels with larger dimensions give rise to lower annual emission factors and solid wood boilers, which are operated solely at nominal load, emit less than modulated boilers. The characteristics of the curve in Figure 9-2 shows that significant reductions of emissions will be reached for storage volumes between 0 to 2,500 l (650 gal). The authors of this study identify 2,250 l (600 gal) to be the optimum volume for the heat storage vessel, which corresponds to 20 l/MBtu/h and 5.9 gal/MBtu/h respectively. In spite of these common guidelines, FNR III 2007 recommends to dimension the heat storage vessel according to the volume of the fuel storage of the boiler and not according CO with modulation CO without modulation OGC with modulation OGC without modulation

volume o f heat storage in 10 3 L9- 4 to the heat load of the boiler due to the fact that the volume of the fuel storage vessel determines the amount of heat that is produced during a combustion cycle, and not the nominal heat load of the boiler.



### 9.2.3 EN 303-5

The EN 303-5 requests manufacturers for boilers with manual stoking to specify how the amount of heat generated can be dissipate d. The most probable solution is to install a heat storage vessel. For the sizing of a heat storage vessel for manual fed boilers, the following equation is given:



###      

− ⋅ ⋅ ⋅ = min 

### 3

. 0 1 5

. 4 Q Q Q T V H N B AT

V

AT

Accumulator tank capacity l Q N Nominal heat output M Btu /

h T

B Burning period h Q H Heating load of the premises M Btu /

h Q min Minimum heat output M Btu /

h

In order to convert the volume of the heat storage vessel from liter to gallons, a factor of 0.264 must be multiplied with V AT .10-1 

# 10 Energy from non-Woody Biomass Fuels

10.1 Emissions and efficiencies of solid non wood biomasses

Carvalho et al. 2007 summarized the main challenges of using agricultural fuels in residential boilers as follows: “... agricultural fuels have, in general, certain physical and chemical properties that may induce problems during combustion. In addition to their low heating value, on average 5% to 10% lower than wood, they have higher ash contents, lower melting points of the ash and higher concentrations of nitrogen, sulphur and chlorine than typical wooden fuels (Werther et al. 2000). Large ash quantities in connection with low ash melting points can cause disturbances by the formation of depo sits or slags in combustion systems not prepared for agricultural fuels. High concentrations of sulphur, nitrogen and chlorine, intensify the emissions of SO 2 , NO x and chlorine compounds respectively (Werther et al. 2000). Chlorine and sulphur, besides promoting the formation of deposits, are also involved in corrosion reactions of metals (Bryers 1996, van Loo, Koppejan 2002).” In extensive tests, combustion behavior of diverse agricultural pelletized biomasses was analyzed by the BE 2020+. Results of these tests are discussed afterwards.


### 10.1.1 Fuels & fuel properties

For the analysis of the combustion behavior of agricultural pellets, most relevant biomasses for the Austrian market were chosen. Altogether, 6 different fuels – hay, maize, miscanthus, straw, vineyard pruning and wheat bran – were considered. In Table 10-1 the fuels and their most relevant properties with regard to combustion are shown as well as average properties of wood fuels. Table 10-1 fuel properties of the investigated pellets and average values for wood fuel (Wopienka et al. 2007)fueldiameter(in)GCV d.b(MBtu/lb)water(%)ash(%) d.b.volatilematter(%) d.b.nitrogen(%) d.b.sulfur(%) d.b.softeningtemperature(°F)

wood (spruce) 8.6 0.20 0.10 0.04 2480 hay 0.236 7.5 7.5 7.40 73.1 1.08 0.13 2085 maize (whole crop) 0.236 8.2 8.7 3.39 80.2 0.89 0.09 1670 miscanthus 0.236 8.2 8.7 3.26 82.9 0.24 0.03 1850 stra w 0.236 8.0 7.9 5.71 74.8 0.66 0.10 1470 vineyard pruning 0.236 9.0 8.4 2.70 - 0.39 - 1465 wheat bran 0.315 8.3 13. 7 5.70 76.8 3.04 0.24 178010-2 The ash content of agricultural pellets is 10 to 20 times higher than the ash content of wood pellets, the nitrogen content is 5 to 10 times and the sulfur content is even 10 to 30 times higher. In comparison to average wood fuels, the softening temperature of agricultural fuels is 550 to 1100 °F lower. These differences clearly influence the combu stion process and therefore emissions and efficiencies.



### 10.1.2 Emissions

In Figure 10-1 the average CO emissions and their deviations are shown for the analyzed bio-fuels and Figure 10-2 exhibits the average dust emissions including deviations for these fuels.

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

123456CO-emissions in mg/MJ

Miscanthus Maize Vineyard pruning Wheat bran Straw Hay

Figure 10-1 average CO emissions including their deviation of the investigated fuels (1 mg/MJ  1.5 mg/m2 at 12% O 2 )(Wopienka et al. 2007)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

Hay Maize (whole crop) Miscanthus Straw Vineyard pruning Wheat branParticle emissions in mg/MJ

Figure 10-2 average dust emissions including their deviation of the investigated fuels; 1 mg/MJ = 0.0023 lb/MMBtu (Wopienka et al. 2007)

The emission values of Figure 10-1 and Figure 10-2 show a week correlation of CO and dust emissions. If CO emissions are low, dust emissions will also be rather low. Miscanthus and vineyard pruning, which have a quite low ash content (Table 10-1), reach the lowest dust and CO emissions. Hay exhibits the highest ash content. It reaches the10-3 highest CO emissions, but its dust emissions are relatively low. A simple and reliable correlation of fuel properties and CO- and dust emissions could not be found. Figure 10-3 exhibits the NO X and SO 2 -Emissions of the considered bio-fuels depending on the nitrogen and sulfur content of the fuels.

Figure 10-3 NO X and SO 2 emissions depending on the nitrogen respective sulphur content of the investigated biomasses (Wopienka et al. 2007) In this case, quite clear correlations can be found: if the nitrogen and sulphur content is low, NO X and SO 2 emissions will be low as well and vice-versa.



### 10.1.3 Efficiencies

In Figure 10-4 the CO-excess air ratio characteristic of the investigated fuels for the test boiler is shown. The CO-excess air ratio characteristic shows at which range of excess air the minimum CO emissions are reached in the test boiler.

m a

i z e

m i s c a n t h u s W h e a t b

r a n h a y

Vi ne y d

. p r.

s t r a w

Figure 10-4 correlation of CO emissions and excess air ratio for the considered fuels (Wopienka et al. 2007)

The optimum excess air ratio varies from approximately 1.5 for maize to approximately 1.9 for wheat bran. Straw shows a very broad characteristic. If the fuels are burnt at optimum conditions (low CO), different excess air ratios are needed. The higher the excess air ratio, the lo wer the efficiency of the boiler, because more combustion air is sucked through the boiler and heat losses in the flue gas are10- 4 increased. Hence, the boiler will reach higher efficiencies with maize than with wheat bran, if it is operated at optimum combustion conditions.


### 10.1.4 Slagging & Corrosion

If non wood bio-fuels are used for combustion, the slagging behavior of these bio-fuels has to be considered. Otherwise molten ash or slag can lead to an emergency shutdown of the combustion unit and cause severe damage in the primary combustion chamber (grate, lining, etc.).

Figure 10-5 ash (left) and ash lumps (right) from combustion of agricultural fuels In Figure 10-6 the slagging tendency of the considered fuels (except for hay) is shown. In order to evaluate the slagging tendency, a mash analysis of the ash was carried out to determine the fraction of all particles in the ash with a diameter > 5.6 mm (0.22 in).

1470°F

1670°F

1850°F 1465°F 1240°F 5,7%

3,4%

3,3% 2,7% 5,7% Softening temp.

Ash content 44,3

25,4

0,3 0,2 34,8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

1Fraction of slag particles (> 5,6 mm) in %

Miscanthus Maize (whole crop) Vineyard pruning Wheat bran Straw 1470°F

1670°F

1850°F 1465°F 1240°F 5,7%

3,4%

3,3% 2,7% 5,7% Softening temp.

Ash content 44,3

25,4

0,3 0,2 34,8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

1Fraction of slag particles (> 5,6 mm) in %

Miscanthus Maize (whole crop) Vineyard pruning Wheat bran Straw 44,3

25,4

0,3 0,2 34,8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

1Fraction of slag particles (> 5,6 mm) in %

Miscanthus Maize (whole crop) Vineyard pruning Wheat bran Straw

Figure 10-6 Slagging tendency of the investigated fuels (Wopienka et al. 2007)

Straw, wheat bran and maize showed a higher slag forming tendency than miscanthus or vineyard pruning pellets. From the combustion of hay almost no slag was found in the ash. Basically, fuels with higher ash content combined with lower softening temperature tend to form a bigger fraction of molten lumps. Next to the slagging phenomena, corrosion of the boiler (heat exchanger, ceramics, grate, combustion chamber) has to be considered when burning non wood bio-fuels.10-5 Chlorine and sulphur are involved in corrosion reactions, therefore the combustion conditions (temperature, atmosphere ) have to be observed. Figure 10-7 shows two examples of corrosion attacks while burning agricultural fuels.

Figure 10-7 corrosive attack of refractory materials after operation with grain (left) and corrosion of metal after straw combustion 

## 10.2 Summary

Due to their high availability, non-wood biomasses are very attractive fuels. They may however have certain general physical and chemical properties that may cause problems during combustion. In addition to the possible increase of NO X , HCl, SO 2 , and other emissions in comparison to wood biomass, higher ash contents combined with lower ash melting temperatures and corrosive effects negatively influence the failure rate and durability of the boilers.A-1 

# A. Literature

1 ST BI M S CH V Erste Verordnung zur Durchfuehrun g des Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetzes (Verordnung ueber kleine und mittlere Feuerungsanlagen – 1. BImSchV), August 2003, www.bundesrechtjuris.de , October 2009
1 ST BI M S CH V – D RAFTEntwurf - Erste Verordnung zur Durchfuehrung des BundesImmissionsschutzgesetzes (Verordnung ueber kleine und mittlere Feuerungsanlagen – 1. BImSchV), July 2009, www.bmu.de , October 2009
A LAKAMGAS , P AJU 2002 Alakamgas, E., Paju, P.: Wood pellets in Finland – technology, economy, and market, OPET- Report 5, VTT Processes, June 2002
BAXI 2007 BAXI A/S, www.baxi.dk , November 2007
BINDER 2007 Josef BINDER Maschinenbau u. Handelsges.m.b.H, www.binder-gmbh.at , December 2007
B ISCHOF 2008 Bischof R.: Uebersicht ueber den Stand der Technik bei der Feinstaubabscheidung fuer Biomassekleinfeuerungen bis 200 kW, internship report, Austrian Bioenergy Centre GbmH, 2008
FJ-BLT 2005 Biomass • Logistics • Technology Francisco Josephinum, blt.josephinum.at , test reports, Austria, 2005
B LUE A NGEL Blauer Engel, Vergabegrundlage Holzpelletoefen RAL-UZ 111 and Vergabegrundlage Holzpelletheizkessel RAL-UZ 112, February 2007, www.blauerengel.de , October 2009
B OEHMER ET AL . 2007 Boehmer S. et al.: Aktualisierung von Emissionsfaktoren als Grundlage fuer den Anhang des Energieberichts, Umweltbundesamt 2007
B RØNNUM 2009 Brønnum A., Danish Technological Institute, written information, 2009
B RUNNER 2007 Ulrich Brunner GmbH, www.brunner.de , November 2007
B RUNNER 2009 Brunner Th., Bioenergy 2020+, oral information, 2009
B RUNNER ET AL 2004 Brunner Th., Joeller M., Obernberger I., 2004: Aerosol formation in fixed-bed biomass furnaces - results from measurements and modelling. To be published in: Proc. of the Internat. Conf. Science in Thermal and Chemical Biomass Conversion, Sept 2004, Canada
B RYERS 1996 Bryers R. W.: Fireside slagging, fouling and high temperature corrosion of heat – transfer surface due to impurities in steam-raising fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 22, pag. 29-120, 1996A-2 B UDERUS 2005 Buderus Austria Heiztechnik GmbH, www.buderus.at , November 2005
C ALIMAX 2007 Calimax Entwicklungs- und Vertriebs-GmbH, www.calimax.com , November 2007
C ARVALHO ET AL

. 2007 Carvalho L. Wopienka E., Eder G., Friedl G., Haslinger W., Woergetter M.: Emissions from Combustion of Agricultural Fuels – Results from Combustion Tests, 15 th European Biomass Conference, Berlin 2007
C ORBITT 1999 Corbitt, R.A.: Standard Handbook of Environmental Engineering, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1999.
D ETROIT S TOKER C OMPANY 1998 Detroit Stoker Company: Company brochure, Bulletin No. 14-05, Detroit Stoker Comp. (ed.), Monroe, MI, USA, 1998

E BERT , 1998 Ebert, H. P.: Heizen mit Holz. 6. Auflage. S taufen bei Freiburg: Oekobuch Verlag, 1998
EN 13284-1 EN 13284-1: Stationary source emissions - Determination of low range mass concentration of dust - Part 1: Manual gravimetric method, 2002
E U P L OT 15, T ASK 1 Preparatory Studies for Eco-design Requirements of EuPs, Lot 15: Solid fuel small combustion installations, Task 1: Scope and Definition, April 2009, www.ecosolidfuel.org , August 2009
E VOTHERM 2010 Evotherm Heiztechnik Vertriebs GmbH, www.hi-res-ltd.com , January 2010
FAV Feuerungsanlagenverordnung, 1997, www.ris.bka.gv.at , October 2009
FNR 2005 Eltrop L., Raab K., Hartmann H., et al.: Leitfaden Bioenergie, Planung, Betrieb und Wirtschaftlichkeit von Bioenergieanlagen, Fac hagenturNachwachsende Rohstoffe, 2005
FNR I 2007Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, Hartmann H. (ed.): Handbuch BioenergieKleinanlagen, Guelzow 2007
FNR II 2007 Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (ed.): Leitfaden Bioenergie. Planung, Betrieb und Wirtschaftlichkeit von Bioenergieanlagen, ISBN 3-00-015389-6, Guelzow, 2007
FNR III 2007Uth J.: Marktuebersicht Scheitholzvergaserkessel Scheitholz-PelletKombinationskessel, Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe, Guelzow 2007
F RIEDLANDER 1977 Friedlander S.K. (1977): Smoke Dust and Haze, ISBN: 0-19-512999-7, John Whiley and Sons, New York, USA
F ROELING 2005 Froeling Heizkessel- und Behaelterbau GmbH, www.froeling.at , November 2005A-3 G UNTAMATIC 2007 Guntamatic Heiztechnik GmbH, www.guntamatic.com , November 2007
H ARGASSNER 2005 Hargassner GmbH, www.hargassner.at , November 2005
H ASLER ET AL . 2000 Hasler Ph., Nussbaumer T., Jenni A.: Praxiserhebung ueber Stickoxid- und Partikelemissionen automatischer Holzfeuerungen, Bundesamt fuer Energie, 2000
H EIN , S CHMITZ 1995 Hein D., Schmitz W.: Innovationen in der Feuerungstechnik fuer nachwachsende Rohstoffe. In: Tagungsband zum internat. Symposium ”Biobrennstoffe und umweltfreundliche Heizanlagen”, Regensburg, Germany, September 1995
H EINZ A BERLE 2007 Heinz Aberle Werksvertretungen, www.heinzaberle.at , November 2007
K ACHELOFENBAUERINNUNG 2007 Innung der Kachelofen und Lu ftheizungsbauer Deutschland, www.kachelofenbauerinnung.de , November 2007
J IRKOWSKY ET A L , 2002 Jirkowsky Ch., Pretzl R., Malzer T., Sihorsch K.: Verfahren zur Staubabscheidung bei Biomassefeuerungen ab 100 kW, 7. Holzenergie-Symposium, ETH Zuerich, 2002
K ACHELOFENVERBAND 2007 Oesterreichischer Kachelofenverband, www.kachelofenverband.at , November 2007
K ALTSCHMITT , H ARTMANN 2001 Kaltschmitt M., Hartmann H. (Hrsg.): Energie aus Biomasse, Grundlagen, Technik, Verfahren; Springer Verlag; Berlin, 2001
K LIPPEL 2007 Klippel N., Nussbaumer Th.: Wirkung von Ve rbrennungspartikeln – Vergleich der Gesundheitsrelevanz von Holzfeueru ng und Dieselmotoren, Bundesamt fuer Energie, Bern 2007
KWB 2007 KWB Kraft und Waerme aus Biomasse GmbH, www.kwb.at , November 2007
L EUCKEL , R OEMER 1979 Leuckel W., Roemer R.; Schadstoffe aus Verbrennungsprozessen; VDI-Bericht Nr. 346; VDI Verlag Duesseldorf; Duesseldorf, 1979
L OO , K OPPEJAN , 2002 Loo S. van, Koppejan J. (ed.): Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-Firing. Enschede, 2002
L UNDGREN 2009 Lundgren J., LTU – Lulea University of Te chnology, Sweden, written information, 2009
M ARUTZKY , S EEGER 1999 Marutzky, R., Seeger, K.: Energie aus Holz und anderer Biomasse, ISBN 3-87181- 347-8, DRW-Verlag Weinbrenner (ed.), Leinfelden-Echtlingen, Germany, 1999
M USIL ET AL . 2006 Musil et al.: Studie ueber die Auswirkungen strengerer Emissionsgrenzwerte fuer Staub in der FAV im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums fuer Wirtschaft und ArbeitA- 4 N ORDIC S WAN Nordic Ecolabelling of Closed fireplaces (2006) and Swan labelling of Solid biofuel boilers (2007), www.svanen.nu , October 2009
NREL 1996 National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratory, University of California, Foster Wheel Dev. Co rp, U.S. Bureau of Mines, T.R.Miles: Alkali Deposits found in Biomass Power Plants, research report NREL/TP-433-8142 SAND96-8225 Vol. I and II, National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Oakridge (ed.), USA, 1996
N USSBAUMER 1995 Nussbaumer Th., Good J.: Projektieren automatischer Holzfeuerungen, Bundesamt fuer Konjunkturfragen (ed.), Bern, 1995
N USSBAUMER 1997 Nussbaumer, Th.: Primaer- und Sekundaermassnahmen zur NO X -Minderung bei Biomassefeuerungen, VDI-Tagung Thermische Biomassenutzung, Salzburg, 23. und 24. April 1997, VDI Bericht 1319, 141–166
N USSBAUMER 1989 Nussbaumer Th., Schadstoffbildung bei de r Verbrennung von Holz, Dissertation, ETH Zuerich; 1989
N USSBAUMER 2008 Nussbaumer Th., Biomass Combustion in Europe, Overview on Technologies and Regulations, prepared for NYSERDA, Verenum Switzerland, 2008
O BERNBERGER , T HEK 2002 Obernberger I., Thek G.: The current state of Austrian pellet boiler technology; Proceedings of the 1st world conference on Pellets, Stockholm, Sweden; ISBN 91- 631-2833-0, September 2002
O BERNBERGER ET AL . 2005 Obernberger I., Brunner T., Baernthaler G.: Aktuelle Erkenntnisse im Bereich der Feinstaubemissionen bei Pelletfeu erungen. In: Tagungsband zum 5. Industrieforum Holzenergie, Okt. 2005, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 54-64, Deutscher Energie-Pellet-Verband e.v. and Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Sonnenenergie e.V. (ed.), Germany, 2005
O EKOFEN 2007 Oekofen Forschungs- und EntwicklungsgesmbH, November 2007
O RAVAINEN 2009 Oravainen H., VTT – Technical Research Centre of Finland; written information, 2009
O SER , N USSBAUMER 2004 Oser M., Nussbaumer T.: Low-Particle-Pelletfeuerung im Leistungsbereich von 100 bis 500 kW, Bundesamt fuer Energie, Bern, 2004
P ELLETGOLD 2009 http://www.pelletgold.net , December 2009
P OLYTECHNIK 2007 Polytechnik Luft- und Feuerungstechnik GmbH, www.polytechnik.com , December 2007
R EGIONALENERGIE S TEIERMARK 2005 Regionalenergie Steiermark, www.regionalenergie.at , November 2005

SHT 2007 sht Heiztechnik aus Salzburg GmbH, www.sht.at, November 2007A-5 S TATUTORY O RDER Statutory Order regulating air pollution from wood burners and boilers and certain other fixed energy-producing installations, December 2007, www.mst.dk , October 2009
S TRUSCHKA ET AL . 2004 Struschka M. et al.: Effiziente Bereitstellung aktueller Emissionsdaten fuer die Luftreinhaltung, Umweltbundesamt, Teste 44/08, 2008
S TRUSCHKA ET AL . 2008 Struschka M., Emich O., Baumbach G.: Untersuchungen an einem Stueckholzkessel mit und ohne Waermespeicher zur Ermittlung optimale Speichergroeßen, Universitaet Stuttgart, 2004
TA L UFT Erste Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Bundes–Immissionsschutzgesetz (Technische Anleitung zur Reinhaltung der Luft – TA Luft), July 2002, www.bmu.de , October 2009
U MWELTZEICHEN Oesterreichisches Umweltzeichen, Rich tlinie UZ 37: Holzheizungen (1 st January 2008, www.umweltzeichen.at , October 2009

VAN L OO , K OPPEJAN 2002 Van Loo S., Koppejan J. (Eds): Handbook of biomass combustion and co firing, Prepared by Task 32 of the implementing agreement on bioenergy under the auspices of the International Energy Agen cy. Twente University Press, Enschede, the Netherlands, 2002
VDI 2066 VDI 2066, Part 1:Particulate matter measurement - Dust measurement in flowing gases – Gravimetric determination of dust load, VDI-Richtlinien, 2006
V EREINBARUNG A RT . 15 A B-VG Vereinbarung Art. 15a B-VG ueber die Einsparung von Energie and ueber Schutzmaßnahmen betreffend Kleinfeuerungen, 1995, www.ris.bka.gv.at , October 2009
V OGLAUER 2005 Voglauer B.: Biomasse Kesselhersteller in Oesterreich, Master Thesis, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Wieselburg, Austria, 2005
W ERTHER ET AL . 2000 Werther J. et al.: Combustion of agricultural residues, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, Vol. 26, page 1-27, 2000
W ESTFEUER 2005 Westfeuer GmbH & Co. KG, www.westfeuer.de , November 2005
W IENERBERGER O FENKACHEL 2007 Wienerberger Ofenkachel GmbH, www.ofenkachel.at , November 2007
W INDHAGER 2005 Windhager Zentralheizung, www.windhager.com , October 2005
W OPIENKA ET AL

. 2007 Wopienka E., Carvalho L., Friedl G.: Combustion Behaviour of various Agricultural Biofuels – Emissions and relevant Combustion parameters
Z UBERBUEHLER 2002 Zuberbuehler: Maßnahmen zur feuerungsseitigen Emissionsminderung bei der Holzverbrennung in gewerblichen Feuerungsanlagen, Dissertation, Universitaet Stuttgart, 2002B-1 

# B. Annex

1. Test details of biomass appliances

1.1. TOP 25% models – solid wood boilers

1.2. TOP 25% models – pellet boilers

1.3. TOP 25% models – wood chip boilers

1.4. All models – combined technology boilers

1.5. All models – pellet stoves

1.6. All models – solid wood stoves

## Solid wood boilers - TOP 25%,GCV%COmg/m312%TSPmg/kgfuelTSPlb/MMBtuNOXmg/m312%,GCV %COmg/m312%



### A 65 35 84 353 189 0.027 153 81 479 B 72 83 142 94 0.014 118 77 107 C 50 83 161 94 0.014 131 D 58 83 69 115 0.017 132 E 58 83 90 109 0.016 90 84 56 F 51 83 219 314 0.046 104 82 258 F 68 83 312 314 0.046 104 82 258 D 68 83 131 115 0.017 170 81 259 A 73 49 83 347 168 0.024 164 83 560 A 56 35 82 199 199 0.029 168 81 479 G 68 82 160 262 0.038 140 83 200 H 75 82 105 346 0.050 128 81 216 I 72 34 82 64 210 0.030 146 79 1069 J 40 68 82 137 1205 0.175 182 K 68 82 137 157 0.023 182 L 68 82 164 419 0.061 110 82 116 M 92 83 248 283 0.041 100 I 92 83 293 189 0.027 132 A 96 49 83 192 199 0.029 177 83 560 N 89 83 137 110 0.016 186 85 538 B 89 83 183 147 0.021 120 78 203 O 89 44 83 183 1299 0.189 F 85 51 83 262 314 0.046 104 82 258 P 102 83 262 304 0.044 113 81 258 F 85 83 287 314 0.046 104 82 258 Q 102 83 40 210 0.030 C 116 83 298 178 0.026 125 80 B 109 82 241 220 0.032 124 77 203 P 85 82 287 283 0.041 101 81 258 R 116 58 82 298 178 0.026 125 D 102 82 189 566 0.082 E 106 82 115 94 0.014 104 F 137 120 84 50 524 0.076 107 83 162 P 137 84 158 356 0.052 81 83 162 I 123 83 343 168 0.024 131 I 167 83 300 157 0.023 144 G 137 83 68 157 0.023 131 84 206 D 150 83 155 681 0.099 181 E 161 83 95 189 0.027 83 110 H 154 82 124 346 0.050 155 81 419 S 157 58 82 78 262 0.038 110 82 294 D 137 82 96 199 0.029 111 T 123 82 207 U 137 82 71 148 0.021 75 83 147 O 137 68 82 232 2232 0.324 34 B 137 82 315 314 0.046 127 80 467< 85 MBtu/h120 - 169 MBtu/h 85 - 120 MBtu/hnominal loadMBtu/h 

### nominal load partial loadpartial loadMBtu/hmanufacturerload range



### page 1/10 25 th 

### January 2010

## Solid wood boilers - TOP 25%,GCV%COmg/m312%TSPmg/kgfuelTSPlb/MMBtuNOXmg/m312%,GCV %COmg/m312%nominal loadMBtu/h 

### nominal load partial loadpartial loadMBtu/hmanufacturerload range



### F 171 120 84 50 524 0.076 107 83 162 P 171 84 50 388 0.056 100 83 162 I 205 83 282 147 0.021 150 E 171 137 83 95 189 0.027 84 110 G 171 83 68 157 0.023 131 84 206 D 171 82 95 168 0.024 123 U 205 82 44 105 0.015 75 84 135 G 205 69 82 68 157 0.023 131 S 178 58 82 78 262 0.038 110 82 294 U 171 82 71 148 0.021 75 83 147 I 208 81 64 K 239 81 195 283 0.041 194> 170 MBtu/h



### page 2/10 25 th 

### January 2010

## pellet boilers - TOP 25%,GCV%COmg/m312%TSPmg/kgfuelTSPlb/MMBtuNOXmg/m312%,GCV %COmg/m312%



### V 50 13 89 47 204 0.025 151 W 41 9 88 29 136 0.017 165 85 37 W 27 8 88 43 91 0.011 159 85 37 X 48 17 88 95 86 Y 48 14 88 47 68 0.008 137 86 128 I 51 15 88 35 193 0.024 120 83 228 W 51 10 88 25 113 0.014 159 35

I 48 13 87 68 147 0.018 127 83 167 Z 32 9 87 73 283 0.035 152 86 48 X 34 13 87 32 91 0.011 105 86 164 X 48 14 87 35 91 0.011 107 86 169 AA 50 14 87 37 107 0.013 120 84 179 Z 41 12 87 30 170 0.021 164 85 113 Z 41 9 87 77 181 0.022 159 84 53 G 51 15 87 7 159 0.019 156 89 33 G 28 8 86 15 102 0.012 124 83 151 Z 32 9 86 72 283 0.035 154 84 53 AB 48 10 86 59 317 0.039 230 85 95 H 51 15 86 42 204 0.025 110 86 199 AC 53 15 86 32 198 0.024 108 87 88 AD 51 15 86 55 351 0.043 159 87

Z 51 14 86 7 113 0.014 125 84 37 AE 41 14 86 71 323 0.040 153 86 234 AE 51 14 86 57 272 0.033 159 86 234 AF 51 17 86 66 170 0.021 122 83 359 G 38 8 86 11 136 0.017 134 83 151 Z 85 26 88 17 170 0.021 128 86 180 X 85 24 88 124 87 I 85 26 88 30 283 0.035 122 85 137 Z 57 17 87 32 147 0.018 149 86 44 F 85 87 15 91 0.011 87 57 AB 88 24 87 38 317 0.039 260 87 55 AA 92 25 87 48 115 0.014 133 87 79 AC 85 23 87 15 91 0.011 157 87 57

Z 75 20 87 45 170 0.021 135 86 108 X 79 24 87 54 102 0.012 111 86 200 G 89 24 87 11 79 0.010 115 84 77 AG 85 25 87 8 193 0.024 139 84 35
AH 92 24 87 47 107 0.013 128 80 362
AG 70 21 87 105 193 0.024 151 83 276 AI 70 21 87 105 193 0.024 151 83 276 AB 85 17 86 85 W 82 7 86 72 453 0.056 151 86 35 A 68 18 86 9 215 0.026 164 84 160 AJ 72 17 86 28 148 0.018 160 86 209 G 85 24 86 59 272 0.033 167 86 72 AF 85 27 86 61 147 0.018 119 83 338

I 68 17 86 12 227 0.028 137 82 314< 55 MBtu/h55 - 100 MBtu/h 

### partial loadpartial loadMBtu/h 

### nominal loadload rangemanufacturernominal loadMBtu/h



### page 3/10 25 th 

### January 2010

## pellet boilers - TOP 25%,GCV%COmg/m312%TSPmg/kgfuelTSPlb/MMBtuNOXmg/m312%,GCV %COmg/m312% 

### partial loadpartial loadMBtu/h 

### nominal loadload rangemanufacturernominal loadMBtu/h



### AF 55 15 86 104 136 0.017 119 84 97 AG 68 20 86 1 272 0.033 145 85 42 AG 68 20 86 12 272 0.033 145 85 42 AK 68 19 86 27 215 0.026 114 83 68 AL 88 26 86 53 125 0.015 83 168 AG 85 25 85 21 306 0.037 93 83 114 AM 65 19 85 30 165 0.020 124 82 218 AN 68 41 85 41 306 0.037 39 48 Y 169 48 89 20 79 0.010 125 85 68 Z 143 42 89 11 193 0.024 179 87 53 AG 102 29 88 5 113 0.014 133 84 29 AO 167 51 88 73 465 0.057 63 85 7

Z 167 42 88 12 227 0.028 183 87 53 AP 120 28 87 70 96 0.012 181 89 G 109 32 87 27 45 0.006 104 84 95 Z 120 26 87 37 238 0.029 126 86 180 AB 137 41 87 87 A 154 40 87 34 295 0.036 131 88 73 X 102 28 87 62 102 0.012 115 86 212 X 137 33 87 73 102 0.012 115 86 219 Z 169 39 87 42 249 0.031 131 84 99 G 167 48 87 23 204 0.025 117 86 86 AQ 133 38 86 20 115 0.014 105 80 587 AR 126 35 86 47 198 0.024 176 85 162 AL 167 48 86 59 295 0.036 83 82 Z 198 42 88 38 431 0.053 183 87 53 AL 236 68 87 20 113 0.014 84 127 AF 219 63 87 59 159 0.019 167 84 156 G 324 97 86 9 272 0.033 119 87 74 AS 331 33 86 363 0.044 AT 286 79 86 4 289 0.035 105 85 26 AU 296 79 86 12 387 0.047 198 113 A 205 40 86 32 419 0.051 144 88 73 AG 280 83 86 42 204 0.025 164 85 91 AR 290 86 86 4 313 0.038 193 88 273 Y 171 47 86 23 283 0.035 109 85 281 AV 885 161 88 41 453 0.056 82 477 D 355 89 87 7 68 0.008 122 86 23 Z 350 112 87 19 215 0.026 126 85 77 Z 731 204 86 14 261 0.032 171 55 66 Z 529 150 86 18 272 0.033 128 86 27 G 478 119 85 16 181 0.022 118 87 16 A R 342 102 85 5 305 0.037 88 200170 - 340 MBtu/h> 340 MBtu/h 100 - 170 MBtu/h



### page 4/10 25 th 

### January 2010

## wood chip boilers - TOP 25%,GCV%COmg/m312%TSPmg/kgfuelTSPlb/MMBtuNOXmg/m312%,GCV %COmg/m312%



### G 68 20 78 35 114 0.022 185 78 176 G 89 26 78 28 85 0.017 180 78 102 AW 96 27 77 71 85 0.017 91 77 96 AG 51 17 77 108 275 0.053 153 73 747 AG 85 25 76 38 332 0.064 171 76 609

Z 85 27 76 72 199 0.039 149 76 181 I 68 18 73 68 570 0.110 173 72 527 D 171 44 81 13 76 0.015 104 78 72 Y 126 38 81 93 133 0.026 179 79 37 A 166 45 80 46 275 0.053 159 80 111 D 102 24 79 22 95 0.018 99 77 322 AP 126 38 79 93 133 0.026 176 77 37 D 169 47 79 49 152 0.029 159 75 194 W 102 28 78 22 57 0.011 127 78 109
Z 157 44 78 47 266 0.052 159 78 81
W 137 28 78 10 47 0.009 131 77 109 AO 167 51 78 28 209 0.040 117 77 183 W 169 47 77 28 47 0.009 90 78 74 A P 169 51 77 16 199 0.039 116 76 39 D 256 97 80 36 361 0.070 136 80 87 Y 340 106 80 87 114 0.022 151 80 239 AX 205 59 79 33 161 0.031 161 78 38 W 273 81 78 15 104 0.020 133 78 106 AO 256 68 78 28 209 0.040 117 77 183 AU 205 58 78 33 387 0.075 76 349

D 323 92 78 7 142 0.028 169 81 101 AT 292 77 78 17 186 0.036 119 77 266 AY 290 87 77 39 108 0.021 106 77 77 AX 256 70 77 15 133 0.026 109 80 33 A G 338 100 77 21 256 0.050 180 78 177

D 342 97 79 36 361 0.070 136 80 87 AY 376 113 79 9 47 0.009 91 77 11 G 656 190 86 19 142 0.028 110 79 7 AZ 666 190 78 19 142 0.028 110 79 7 AX 342 96 77 9 152 0.029 45 75 199 W 512 143 77 40 247 0.048 168 79 38 AU 354 85 86 20 373 0.072 159 77 233 A G 345 100 77 21 256 0.050 180 77 177 AB 820 246 79 34 408 0.079 134 78 124 AB 1025 246 79 68 541 0.105 149 78 124 AX 1708 490 78 35 399 0.077 177 79 213 AX 2220 490 78 35 807 0.156 100 79 213 BA 1708 427 77 15 275 0.053 92 79 11 A 751 184 77 16 294 0.057 90 76 43 B A 1025 256 76 33 598 0.116 178 77 19340 - 680 MBtu/h> 680 MBtu/hload rangemanufacturer 

### partial load< 100 MBtu/h100 - 200 MBtu/h200 - 340 MBtu/hnominal loadMBtu/hpartial loadMBtu/h 

### nominal load

page 5/8 25 th 

### January 2010combined technology boilers,GCV % CO mg/m 3 12% TSP mg/kg fuel TSP lb/MMBtu NO X mg/m 3 12%,GCV % CO mg/m 3 12%,GCV % CO mg/m 3 12% TSP mg/kg fuel TSP lb/MMBtu NO X mg/m 3 12%,GCV % CO mg/m 3 12%BB51 79 104 227 0.028 92 17 51 4838T51 10 81 23 136 0.017 162 17 51 72 8775U85 25 81 45 193 0.024 218 34 102 34 81 158 157 0.023 96 17102G85 25 84 12 329 0.040 152 34 102 51 81 160 262 0.038 140 16711U51 14 84 17 215 0.026 99 23 68 34 81 158 157 0.023 96 16799T126 37 84 6 215 0.026 147 50 153 83530157 0.023 150G51 15 84 1 136 0.017 159BB68 79 104 227 0.028 92 28 85 6188AZ85 26 84 12 329 0.040 152 34 102 51 81 160 262 0.038 140 16711AZ51 15 84 1 136 0.017 159 23 68 34 82 160 262 0.038 140 16387BB68 79 36 109 6975BC51 802251133 0.139 17 51 27 76 8189BC68 81225567 0.069 28 85 41 76 9190BC68 81225567 0.069 34 102 61 76 9190H68 15 83294204 0.025 111 77BD68 24 83118147 0.018 141 34 102 51 801384220 0.032 141 87 8303BE51 15 84195102 0.012 138 67 17 51 15 9449BF51 14 84 45 68 0.008 95 88 17 51 14 76 11588H86 15 84225193 0.024 114 34 102 84 316 293 0.043 122 11711S51 15 84248215 0.026 120 74 17 51 79377545 0.079 174 11509S85 26 84248215 0.026 120 74 34 102 79377545 0.079 174 11509H85 15 84248215 0.026 120 74I102 22 86 11 329 0.040 141 30 92 83 293 189 0.027 132 13322BC79 14 8622511330.139 26 79 14 76 8399I75 22 87 21 261 0.032 141 30 92 83 293 189 0.027 132 13136I205 60 88 19 193 0.024 114 68 205 83 282 147 0.021 150 18225I137 36 88 36 204 0.025 124 41 123 83 343 168 0.024 131 14587I167 47 88 36 204 0.025 124 55 167 83 300 157 0.023 144 18225H52 15 89 90 176 0.022 104 18 54 87576157 0.023 104 11374

manufacturersolid woodpelletspartial load nominal load MBtu/h partial load MBtu/hnominal load partial load

TOP 25% partial load MBtu/hnominal load

nominal load MBtu/h

Data restpage 6/1025thJanuary 2010combined technology boilers,GCV % CO mg/m 3 12% TSP mg/kg fuel TSP lb/MMBtu NO X mg/m 3 12%,GCV % CO mg/m 3 12% CO mg/m 3 12% TSP mg/kg fuel TSP lb/MMBtu NO X mg/m 3 12%,GCV % CO mg/m 3 12%AO167 51 80 73 389 0.075 63 33 55 167 51 85 96 430 0.062 63 39AO335 68 80 73 389 0.075 63 33 77 232 68 85 96 430 0.062 63 39AO249 73 73 56 275 0.053 92 86 262 78 96 105 0.015 134solid woodnominal load

nominal load MBtu/h partial load MBtu/h

manufacturerred data: CO emission > averaged CO emissions partial load MBtu/hnominal load partial loadwood chipspartial load nominal load MBtu/h

all data Datapage 7/1025thJanuary 2010

## pellet stoves,GCV%COmg/m312%TSPmg/kgfuelTSPlb/MMBtuNOXmg/m312%,GCV %COmg/m312%



### BG 27 7 89 236 306 0.037 88 414 V 8 17 88 167 589 0.072 86 186 BG 20 88 86 272 0.033 309 BH 29 88 169 306 0.037 628 BI 27 7 88 236 306 0.037 88 414 BG 27 88 236 306 0.037 414 BG 27 88 261 272 0.033 498 BG 27 87 261 272 0.033 498 BG 27 87 261 272 0.033 498 BG 27 87 261 272 0.033 498 BG 27 87 261 272 0.033 498 BJ 27 87 266 520 BK 20 7 87 261 272 0.033 77 498 BL 17 8 87 470 714 0.087 70 410 BG 20 7 87 261 272 0.033 77 498 BG 20 7 86 261 272 0.033 77 498 BG 20 7 86 261 272 0.033 77 498 BI 20 7 86 261 272 0.033 77 498 BI 20 7 86 261 272 0.033 77 498 BI 20 7 86 261 272 0.033 77 498 BI 20 7 86 261 272 0.033 77 498 BG 20 7 86 261 272 0.033 77 498 BM 27 8 86 196 91 0.011 318 BN 24 8 86 231 351 0.043 123 89 989 BL 24 8 86 231 351 0.043 123 89 989 BL 24 8 86 231 351 0.043 123 89 989 BO 24 8 86 231 351 0.043 123 89 989 BL 24 8 86 231 351 0.043 123 89 989 BN 20 86 75 147 0.018 15 174 BP 27 9 86 261 272 0.033 77 498 BP 27 8 86 171 91 0.011 233 BP 20 8 86 77 370 BQ 28 10 86 169 533 0.065 259 77 788 BM 20 17 88 844 850 0.104 225 BH 30 87 169 340 0.042 563 BP 31 6 87 153 283 0.035 106 398 BR 32 9 87 164 374 0.046 114 1168 BL 34 11 86 234 408 0.050 110 87 375 BN 34 11 86 234 408 0.050 110 87 375 BL 34 11 86 234 408 0.050 110 88 375 BR 31 9 86 293 363 0.044 213 914 BL 34 11 86 516 397 0.049 92 83 405 BL 34 11 86 234 408 0.050 110 87 375 BH 38 85 281 340 0.042 271 BL 41 11 85 234 408 0.050 110 375 BS 67 159 223 0.027 BT 113 85 664 533 0.065 192 BT 120 85 612 567 0.069 168 BT 123 85 803 567 0.069 162 BT 128 85 900 601 0.074 197 BT 131 85 1316 669 0.082 187 BT 132 85 881 329 0.040 105DataTOP 25%rest< 30 MBtu/h> 30 MBtu/hTOP 25%rest 

### partial load nominal loadload rangewithoutnominal loadMBtu/hpartial loadMBtu/hwater circulatemanufacturer



### page 8/10 25 th 

### January 2010

## pellet stoves

V 51 13 85 39 113 0.014 189 H 25 8 85 104 136 0.017 125 87 628 BG 38 10 85 141 136 0.017 162 88 408 BI 44 10 85 169 204 0.025 158 88 408 H 31 10 85 133 193 0.024 128 87 488 BG 44 10 85 169 204 0.025 158 88 408 BI 38 10 85 141 136 0.017 162 88 408 BG 38 85 141 136 0.017 268 BG 44 84 169 204 0.025 268 BI 31 10 84 174 113 0.014 158 88 408 BI 34 7 84 185 204 0.025 90 88 380 BG 34 7 84 185 204 0.025 90 88 380 BI 34 7 84 185 204 0.025 90 88 380 BK 34 7 84 185 204 0.025 90 88 380 S 39 11 84 231 272 0.033 137 86 703 BP 31 7 84 81 261 0.032 95 88 605 BM 34 7 84 124 306 0.037 117 88 605 BU 41 13 84 460 544 0.067 111 88 701 BU 41 13 84 460 544 0.067 111 88 701 BL 34 9 84 132 714 0.087 100 88 277 BP 41 12 84 162 249 0.031 131 87 345 H 41 12 84 162 249 0.031 131 87 345 BI 34 7 84 73 170 0.021 84 84 439 BG 34 7 84 73 170 0.021 84 84 439 BL 34 12 84 167 385 0.047 108 87 424 BJ 45 15 84 184 320 0.039 540 BH 44 84 267 238 0.029 744restwith

red data: CO emission > averaged CO emissionsTOP 25%all loads



### page 9/10 25 th 

### January 2010

## solid wood stoves,GCV%COmg/m312%TSPmg/kgfuelTSPlb/MMBtuNOXmg/m312%,GCV %COmg/m312%



### BT 123 76 1055 524 0.076 162 BT 128 74 1182 555 0.081 197 BP 25 73 1077 210 0.030 72 BT 113 73 872 492 0.072 192 BV 33 16 72 1065 156 0.023 85 71 1689 BV 29 14 72 795 280 0.041 137 70 1766 BP 30 72 1253 524 0.076 119 BV 29 12 72 1340 312 0.045 129 70 1400 BV 31 15 71 1278 140 0.020 109 76 1776 BP 26 14 71 776 225 0.033 59 73 BV 33 16 72 1065 156 0.023 85 71 1689
BV 29 12 72 1340 312 0.045 129 70 1400
BP 21 74 2535 870 0.126 142 BT 131 73 1729 618 0.090 187 BV 26 12 72 2401 732 0.106 120 70 1723 BV 25 12 72 1691 265 0.038 122 75 1810 BV 23 11 72 1742 748 0.109 119 75 1790 BM 1 7 7 2 184 7 41 9 0.061 22 5 BM 2 0 7 2 184 7 41 9 0.061 22 5 BM 24 7 2 221 6 78 6 0.114
BV 32 16 71 1287 234 0.034 82 73 1246
BV 33 15 71 1048 530 0.077 99 71 1656 BV 22 11 71 2135 732 0.106 95 70 1823 BT 120 71 804 524 0.076 168 BT 132 71 1157 304 0.044 105 BP 34 71 1971 482 0.070 95 BP 27 14 71 2355 178 0.026 133 BP 23 13 71 1085 309 0.045 112 73 933 BV 32 16 71 1158 62 0.009 135 72 1683 BK 30 15 71 1197 421 0.061 147 71 1279 BP 28 22 70 1359 147 0.021 127 71 1895 BV 27 14 70 1346 171 0.025 135 74 1836
BV 25 12 70 2078 467 0.068 139 72 1805
BV 28 13 70 1169 405 0.059 144 70 1808 BV 26 12 70 1270 296 0.043 140 73 1708 BV 26 13 70 1059 93 0.014 115 70 1724 BV 28 14 70 1070 156 0.023 140 71 1810 BP 27 14 70 1921 BP 19 69 2102 241 0.035 163 BM 2 0 6 7 184 7 41 9 0.061 22 5 BM 2 7 6 7 221 6 78 6 0.114 22 5 BP 28 64 1884 880 0.128 107 BP 20 64 BP 26 64rest 

### partial loadTOP 25%datamanufacturernominal loadMBtu/hpartial loadMBtu/h 

### nominal load

kursive data: only minimum efficiency and maximum emissions were give n red data: CO emission > averaged CO emissions



### page 10/10 25 th 

### January 2010

### For information on other NYSERDA reports, contact:
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority 17 Columbia Circle Albany, New York 12203-6399

toll free: 1 (866) NYSERDA local: (518) 862-1090

fax: (518) 862-1091
info@nyserda.org www.nyserda.org

# E UROPEAN 

# W OOD 

# -H EATING 

# T ECHNOLOGY 

# S URVEY 

# : A N OVERVIEW OF 

## C OMBUSTION 

## P RINCIPLES AND THE 

## E NERGY AND 

## E MISSIONS 

## P ERFORMANCE 

## C HARACTERISTICS OF 

## C OMMERCIALLY 

## A VAILABLE 

## S YSTEMS IN 

## A USTRIA 

## , G ERMANY 

## , D ENMARK 

## , N ORWAY 

## , AND 

## S WEDEN



### F INAL 

### R EPORT 

### 10-01



## S TATE OF 

## N EW 

## Y ORK 

### D AVID 

### A. P ATERSON 

### , G OVERNOR



## N EW 

## Y ORK 

## S TATE 

## E NERGY 

## R ESEARCH AND 

## D EVELOPMENT 

## A UTHORITY 

### V INCENT 

### A. D E 

### I ORIO 

### , E SQ 

### ., C HAIRMAN 

### F RANCIS 

### J. M URRAY 

### , J R 

### ., P RESIDENT AND 

### C HIEF 

### E XECUTIVE 

### O FFICER