alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Mr. J. R. Stroble 

Manager, National TRU Program 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, New Mexico 88221-3090 

Dear Mr. Stroble: 

SEP 1 0 2014 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

On November 12,2013 the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Carlsbad Field Office (CBFO), 

requested as a Tier 1 (T1) change, for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's approval to add the 

remote-handled (RH) waste stream (ID-MFC-SOLID-RH) to the EPA-approved RH waste Summary 

Category Group S3000. With this letter EPA approves the requested Tier 1 (Tl) change to include four 

(4) containers ofthe above RH waste stream (also referred to as INL Lot SA) to the approved RH S3000 

waste. We base our approval on the evaluation elements discussed in the enclosed report (EPA Air 

Docket No. A-98-49; II-A4-188). 

If you have any questions regarding this approval, please contact Rajani Joglekar at (202) 343-9462 or 

Ed Feltcorn at (202) 343-9422. 

En(;losure 

cc: Electronic Distribution 

Joe Franco, CBFO 

Court Fesmire, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Tom Morgan, CBFO 

Mike Brown, CBFO QA 

Site Documents 

Sincerely, 

~?~ Tom Peake, Director 

Center for Waste Management and Regulations 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

RecyclediRecyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accessory Specialists Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

| 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/Anthony N. DeMint                                 

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

November 1, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001021061
<NAME>                        Metris Companies Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     0

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         28,505
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               118,962
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        1,763,009
<ALLOWANCE>                                    619,028
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2,045,082
<DEPOSITS>                                     775,381
<SHORT-TERM>                                   893
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            0
<LONG-TERM>                                    344,119
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    329,729
<COMMON>                                       386
<OTHER-SE>                                     293,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 2,045,082
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                229,394
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4,477
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               2,298
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               236,169
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             19,329
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             36,512
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          180,328
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  174,800
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                437,984
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                191,316
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     115,363
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                50,808
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   64,555
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (1.60)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (1.60)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 18.10
<LOANS-NON>                                    0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   270,092
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               393,283
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  582,637
<RECOVERIES>                                   39,552
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              619,028
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           619,028
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 18




July 2, 1999

Mr. C. Michael Moore, Chief Financial Officer
Discount Auto Parts, Inc.
4900 Frontage Road, South
Lakeland, Florida

Dear Sir:

Note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements of Discount Auto Parts, Inc., included
in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 1, 1999, describes a
change in the method of accounting for store inventories from the FIFO retail
inventory method to the weighted average cost method. You have advised us that
you believe that the change is to a preferable method in your circumstances
because the weighted average cost method for computing inventories more
accurately measures the cost of the Company's merchandise and produces a better
matching of revenues and expenses.

There are no authoritative criteria for determining a `preferable' method of
costing inventories based on the particular circumstances; however, we conclude
that the change in the method of accounting for store inventories from the FIFO
retail inventory method to the weighted average cost method is to an acceptable
alternative method which, based on your business judgment to make this change
for the reasons cited above, is preferable in your circumstances.


                                          Very truly yours,


                                          /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                          -------------------------------------
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0557. JOEL A. DALLOW v. MARY ELLEN DALLOW.

Joel A. Dallow has filed an appeal of the trial court’s order denying his motion

to recuse the trial court judge. We lack jurisdiction.

In the underlying proceeding, Mary Ellen Dallow filed a petition for divorce

from Joel Dallow. It appears that the trial court entered an order regarding the custody

of their children, and Joel Dallow filed an appeal of that order in the Supreme Court.

On February 23, 2016, the trial court denied Joel Dallow’s motion to recuse the trial

court judge. Joel Dallow filed an appeal of that order in the Supreme Court. The

Supreme Court transferred the appeal to this Court, explaining that the appeal was not

from a final judgment of divorce and the sole issue on appeal, recusal, was a matter

other than divorce or alimony.

Orders denying motions to recuse are interlocutory, and appeals of such orders

require compliance with the interlocutory appeal procedures of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b),

including obtaining a certificate of immediate review from the trial court. Murphy v.

Murphy, 322 Ga. App. 829, 829-832 (747 SE2d 21) (2013); Ellis v. Stanford, 256 Ga.

App. 294, 295 (2) (568 SE2d 157) (2002). Joel Dallow’s failure to comply with the

interlocutory appeal procedures deprives us of jurisdiction. See Warringer v.

Warringer, 204 Ga. App. 86, 86 (418 SE2d 446) (1992).

1 Accordingly, this appeal is

1 Orders denying motions to recuse may be reviewed after the entry of final

judgment, as part of the appealfrom final judgment. See OCGA§ 5-6-34 (d);Murphy,

supra at 830-832;Ellis,supra at 295 (2). Here, while Joel Dallow contendsthat the trial

court entered a final order on child custody prior to its denial of his recusal motion,

his notice of appeal is based solely on the trial court’s denial of his recusal motion, and

November 09, 2016
hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

it appears his case remained pending when he filed his notice of appeal. See

Warringer, supra at 86.

11/09/2016
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1803

ROBERT A. ZANDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, 

Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:12-cv-00700-WO-JEP)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert A. Zander, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Brodish Childs, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert A. Zander appeals the district court’s order accepting 

the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on 

Zander’s action filed pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, and 

a subsequent order denying reconsideration. Zander also appeals 

the magistrate judge’s order granting the Government’s motion for 

a protective order. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Zander v. United States, No. 1:12-cv00700-WO-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2015; Mar. 31, 2016; July 7, 2016). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 23.1**

Consent of Independent Registered Public AccountingFirm

Edge Petroleum Corporation

Houston,Texas

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statementon Form S-3 (No. 333-125677) and Form S-8 (No. 333-113619, No. 333-106484, No.333-61890, No. 333-93209, and No. 333-22571) of Edge Petroleum Corporation (the“Company”) of our reports dated March 9, 2007, relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements and to the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controlover financial reporting, which appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
| /s/ BDO SEIDMAN,  LLP |
|-----------------------|
|                  |
| Houston, Texas        |
| March 9, 2007         |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM DEEPTECH
INTERNATIONAL INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT JUNE
30, 1997 INCLUDED IN ITS FORM 10-K/A FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K/A.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          12,522
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,444
<PP&E>                                         127,665
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,159
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 228,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,701
<BONDS>                                        164,561
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           195
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,344
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   228,218
<SALES>                                        131,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               134,117
<CGS>                                          123,393
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,129
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,453
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,566
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,177)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,343)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,834)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,834)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.10)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015356EN.01000601.xml

| 28.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 October 2015

(2015/C 356/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1061 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,06 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4600 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72140 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4065 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0880 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3630 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,098 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2919 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4370 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2185 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5299 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4622 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5724 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6261 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5422 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 257,44 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2010 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0265 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6225 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 099,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7280 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,789 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,6121 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,270 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3377 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,3502 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,8563 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1061

JPY

Japanese yen

133,06

DKK

Danish krone

7,4600

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72140

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4065

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0880

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3630

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,098

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2919

RON

Romanian leu

4,4370

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2185

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5299

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4622

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5724

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6261

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5422

KRW

South Korean won

1 257,44

ZAR

South African rand

15,2010

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0265

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6225

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 099,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7280

PHP

Philippine peso

51,789

RUB

Russian rouble

71,6121

THB

Thai baht

39,270

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3377

MXN

Mexican peso

18,3502

INR

Indian rupee

71,8563

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

David H. Sawyer 

In re Phelps, Minors 

Presiding Judge 

Docket No. 332762 

Jane E. Markey 

LC No. 13-052802-NA 

Colleen A. O'Brien 

Judges 

The Court orders that the October 10, 20 16 opinion is hereby AMENDED to correct a 

clerical error. The opinion is corrected to read November I 0, 2016 as the date of the opinion. 

In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

NOV 1 8 2016 

Date
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1879

JOHN E. DRISCOLL, III; LAURA D. HARRIS; DANIEL J. PESACHOWITZ; 

DEENA L. REYNOLDS, Substitute Trustee,

Plaintiffs - Appellees,

v.

SANDRA S. FORQUER,

Defendant – Appellant,

and

BARBARA S. FORQUER,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. 

(1:16-cv-02555-ELH)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra S. Forquer, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Brooks Riley, 

TREANOR, POPE & HUGHES, PA, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Sandra S. Forquer seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

remanding this removed action to the state court for lack of 

jurisdiction. With certain exceptions not applicable here, “[a]n 

order remanding a case to the State court from which it was removed 

is not reviewable on appeal or otherwise.” 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) 

(2012). The Supreme Court has limited the scope of § 1447(d) to 

prohibiting appellate review of remand orders based on a defect in 

the removal procedure or lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 

Quackenbush v. Allstate Ins. Co., 517 U.S. 706, 711–12 (1996); see

28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) (2012). Here, the remand was based on lack of 

subject matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, this court lacks 

jurisdiction to review the district court’s order. We therefore 

deny Forquer leave to proceed in forma pauperis and grant 

Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accessory Specialists Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

May 5, 2006
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BENEFICIAL CONSUMER DISCOUNT 

COMPANY D/B/A BENEFICIAL 

MORTGAGE COMPANY OF 

PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PAMELA A. VUKMAN,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 98 WM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus 

is DENIED.
# C_2016146EN.01000401.xml

| 26.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/4

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 146/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Finland

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The Finnish writer and lyricist Eino Leino

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : At the inner part of the coin is a flame, and a poker pointing upwards to the right. The inscription ‘EINO LEINO’, in semi-circle and the year of issuance ‘2016’ are placed at the right. At the bottom left is the indication of the issuing country ‘FI’ and the mint mark.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : April 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---