alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015323EN.01000101.xml

| 1.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 323/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 323/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7733 — Tokio Marine/HCC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 323/01)

On 9 September 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7733. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7733. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re Gilead Sciences, Inc.

No. 06-21-00030-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the Relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus should be conditionally granted, and we direct the trial court to (1) to withdraw the 

April 5 order denying Gilead’s motion for a stay of proceedings and (2) to enter an order granting

Gilead’s motion to stay proceedings until entry of final judgment in the Pennsylvania Action. The 

writ will issue only if the trial court fails to act in accordance with this opinion. 

RENDERED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.49

                     AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


        AMENDMENT, dated as of September ___, 1997, between Ticketmaster
Corporation (the "Company"), and Judy A. Black ("Executive").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

        WHEREAS, the Company and Executive are parties to that certain
Employment Agreement, dated as of March 1, 1995 (the "Agreement"), relative to
Executive's employment by the Company; and

        WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have agreed to make certain
amendments to the Agreement;

        NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the mutual covenants
and agreements contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby mutually acknowledged, the parties
hereto agree as follows:

        1. DEFINITIONS. Terms defined in the Agreement shall have the same
meaning when used in this Amendment, unless the context requires otherwise.

        2. EXTENSION OF THE TERM. The term of the Agreement is hereby extended
for a period of three (3) additional years, commencing on March 1, 1998 and
ending on February 28, 2001 (the "Extension Period").

        3. BASE SALARY AMOUNT DURING EXTENSION. The Base Salary Amount during
the first, second and third Contract Years of the Extension Period shall be
$275,000, $285,000 and $300,000, respectively, per annum.

        4. CONTINUED EFFECTIVENESS OF AGREEMENT. Except as expressly set forth
herein, the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with
its terms and provisions thereof.

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this
Agreement effective as of the date and year first written above.

                                    By:     Ticketmaster Corporation,
                                            a Illinois corporation

<PAGE>   2

                                            By: 
                                              ----------------------------------
                                            Title:
                                                 -------------------------------


                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Judy A. Black, an individual



                                      -2-
<PAGE>


                                                                   Exhibit 24-3


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY


        KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, William P.
Leiser and J. Christopher Kirk and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for
him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director or
officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware
corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000, and to sign any or all amendments to
such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other
documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or
without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises,
as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or
their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.


                                        /s/ James R. Erwin
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        James R. Erwin
# C_2016060EN.01000201.xml

| 16.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 60/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 60/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 February 2016

(2016/C 60/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1180 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,60 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4638 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77200 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4862 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1009 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6313 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,037 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,24 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3945 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4689 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2908 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5624 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5454 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7036 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6772 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5643 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 352,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6114 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2606 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 947,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6224 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,000 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,3193 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,818 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4567 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0910 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,1045 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1180

JPY

Japanese yen

127,60

DKK

Danish krone

7,4638

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77200

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4862

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1009

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6313

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,037

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,24

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3945

RON

Romanian leu

4,4689

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2908

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5624

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5454

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7036

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6772

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5643

KRW

South Korean won

1 352,15

ZAR

South African rand

17,6114

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2606

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 947,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6224

PHP

Philippine peso

53,000

RUB

Russian rouble

86,3193

THB

Thai baht

39,818

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4567

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0910

INR

Indian rupee

76,1045

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014431EN.01000301.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/3

---

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court

(2014/C 431/05)

At its General Meeting on 14 October 2014, the Court drew up the list for determining the composition of the Grand Chamber as follows:

Mr Rosas

Mr Lycourgos

Mr Juhász

Ms Jürimäe

Mr Borg Barthet

Mr Biltgen

Mr Malenovský

Mr Rodin

Mr Levits

Mr Vajda

Mr Ó Caoimh

Mr Da Cruz Vilaça

Mr Bonichot

Mr Fernlund

Mr Arabadjiev

Mr Jarašiūnas

Ms Toader

Ms Prechal

Mr Safjan

Ms Berger

Mr Šváby

At its General Meeting on 14 October 2014, the Court drew up the list for determining the composition of the Second Chamber of five Judges as follows:

Mr Bonichot

Mr Lycourgos

Mr Arabadjiev

Mr Da Cruz Vilaça

At its General Meeting on 14 October 2014, the Court drew up the list for determining the composition of the Seventh Chamber of three Judges as follows:

Mr Arabadjiev

Mr Da Cruz Vilaça

Mr Lycourgos

---
# C_2015280EN.01000401.xml

| 25.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 280/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 280/4

---

Call for proposals under the 2015 work plan of the Bio-based Industries Public-Private Partnership

(2015/C 280/05)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the call for proposals and related activities under the 2015 work plan of the Bio-based Industries Public-Private Partnership.

Proposals are invited for the following call: H2020-BBI-JTI-2015-02

This work plan, including deadlines and budgets for the activities, is available through the Participant Portal website (http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal) along with information on the modalities of the call and related activities, as well as guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals. All this information will be updated as necessary on the same Participant Portal.

---
Exhibit 10.7


 


SUBSCRIPTION OF SHARE(S)


 


Date [___], 2021


 


	TO :	The Board of Director(s)
	 	Phoenix Acquisition Limited
	 	British Virgin Islands


 


Dear Sir,


 


We hereby apply for ______ ordinary share(s) for USD$____ in the capital
of your Company.


 


Yours faithfully,


For and on behalf of


 


	 	 
	[Name]	 


 


	 	Address:	Corporate Registrations Limited, Sea Meadow House, Blackburne Highway, P.O. Box 116, Road Town, Tortola, BVI


 


	 	Occupation:	Corporation
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-23-0000491

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI I

E.W., Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

A.W., Defendant-Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

(CASE NO. 5DV211000135)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

(By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Nakasone and McCullen, JJ.)

Upon review of the record, it appears that:

(1) The statement of jurisdiction and opening brief

were due on or before February 8, 2024; 

(2) Self-represented Plaintiff-Appellant E.W. failed to

file either document;

(3) On February 13, 2024, the appellate clerk entered a

default notice informing E.W. that the time for filing the

statement of jurisdiction and opening brief had expired, the

matter would be called to the court's attention on February 23,

2024, for appropriate action, which could include dismissal of

the appeal, under Hawai i Rules of Appellate Procedure

Rules 12.1(e) and 30, and E.W. could request relief from default

by motion; and 

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-23-0000491

05-MAR-2024

07:55 AM

Dkt. 35 ODSD
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(4) E.W. has not taken any further action in this

appeal.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the appeal is

dismissed.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai i, March 5, 2024.

/s/ Katherine G. Leonard

Acting Chief Judge

/s/ Karen T. Nakasone

Associate Judge

/s/ Sonja M.P. McCullen

Associate Judge

2
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16492]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07083]



[[Page 16492]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9072]


In the Matter of the Designation of Aliaskhab Kebekov, Also Known 
as Aliaskhab Alibulatovich Kebekov, Also Known as Sheikh Ali Abu 
Muhammad ad-Dagestani, Also Known as Sheikh Abu Muhammad, Also Known as 
Abu Muhammad Ali ad-Dagestani, Also Known as Abu Mukhammad Aliaskhab, 
Also Known as Magomed Kebekov, Also Known as Ali Abu Muhammad al 
Dagestani, Also Known as Ali Abu Muhammed al-Dagestani, Also Known as 
Ali Abu-Mukhammad, Also Known as Ali Abu Mukhammad, Also Known as Ali 
Abu Muhammad, Also Known as Abu-Muhammad al-Qawqazi, Also Known as Abu 
Mukhammad Kebekov; as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant 
to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Aliaskhab 
Kebekov, also known as Aliaskhab Alibulatovich Kebekov, also known as 
Sheikh Ali Abu Muhammad ad-Dagestani, also known as Sheikh Abu 
Muhammad, also known as Abu Muhammad Ali ad-Dagestani, also known as 
Abu Mukhammad Aliaskhab, also known as Magomed Kebekov, also known as 
Ali Abu Muhammad al Dagestani, also known as Ali Abu Muhammed al-
Dagestani, also known as Ali Abu-Mukhammad, also known as Ali Abu 
Mukhammad, also known as Ali Abu Muhammad, also known as Abu-Muhammad 
al-Qawqazi, also known as Abu Mukhammad Kebekov committed, or poses a 
significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the 
security of U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or 
economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: March 18, 2015.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-07083 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-AD-P
Order filed, December 01, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-16-00831-CV

____________

CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS, Appellant

V.

FRONTIER CONTRACT SERVICES, LLC, Appellee

On Appeal from the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-18387

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 22, 2016. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the 

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record 

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Jodi Masera, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
#### Punch and others vs. The Town *of*New Berlin and others.

*Appeal to Supreme Court from, order of judge at chambers.*

1. Under eh. 139, Laws of 1861, a party applying for an injunction to a judge at chambers, who wishes to appeal to the supreme court from an order refusing his application, must give immediate notice of such appeal, and must *within, three days*tender to the opposite party a written undertaking, &c.

2. The appeal in this case dismissed for failure to comply with these requirements of the statute.

*1903. The fact that the respondent noticed the cause for argument in this court, *held*not to be a *wawet'*of this objection to the appeal,

é. "Whether the legislature has power under the constitution of this state to provide for an immediate appeal to the supreme court from the decision of a judge at chambers, is not decided.

APPEAL from an order made at chambers by the Circuit Judge of *Waukesha*County.

*A. Cook,*for appellants.

*Palmer &*Hooker, for respondents.

Cole, J.

The motion to dismiss this appeal must be granted. Tbe appeal is from an order of a circuit judge, made at chambers, denying an injunction, and was undoubtedly intended to be taken under ch. 139, Laws of 1861. Now, assuming that it is competent for the legislature, under our constitution, to provide for appeals directly to this court from orders made by a circuit judge at chambers (a point upon which we do not wish to be understood as expressing any opinion), still it is obvious that the party appealing must comply with the statute. He did not do so in this case. The statute provides that the party interested in procuring the injunction must give immediate notice of apjeeal to the opposite party, and *tender within three days*thereafter to such party a written -undertaking, with sufficient surety in such sum as the court or judge may direct. The order in this case was made on the 13th of March, and it appears that no undertaking was served until after the 20th of that month. In order to perfect the appeal, the plaintiffs should have given immediate notice of an appeal, and made and tendered within three days, to the adverse party, a written undertaking in such sum as the judge might direct.

We do not think there was any waiver of this irregularity in taking the appeal, by the respondents noticing the cause for argument.

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 12/31/95 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-K (RESTATED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) REPORT
ON FORM 10-K (RESTATED).
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,618
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (456)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,492
<PP&E>                                           4,535
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,924)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,606
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,219
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,158
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,606
<SALES>                                         42,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                42,494
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   355
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 230
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    499
<INCOME-TAX>                                       185
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.07


</TABLE>
Docket No: FAA-2015-4809 Dir ID: 2015-NM-012-AD

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/22/15

Regional Airline Association 1/22/15

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 1/22/15

ATA Joe White 1/22/15
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
 OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


By signing below, the Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i)
this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of Hybrid Fuels Inc.



Signed this 22nd day of February 2005:



By: /s/ Paul Warkentin
----------------------------------
Paul Warkentin
President/CEO/Acting CFO
(Principal Executive Officer and
Acting Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Hybrid Fuels Inc. and will be
retained by Hybrid Fuels Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.