alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2866 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2866

To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from restricting 
direct access by health care facilities to COVID-19 monoclonal antibody 
                               therapies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 28, 2021

Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Cramer, 
Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Braun, and Mr. Tuberville) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit the Secretary of Health and Human Services from restricting 
direct access by health care facilities to COVID-19 monoclonal antibody 
                               therapies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Treatment Restoration for Emergency 
Antibody Therapeutics Act'' or the ``TREAT Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON RESTRICTIONS ON DIRECT ACCESS TO COVID-19 
              MONOCLONAL ANTIBODY THERAPIES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section as 
the ``Secretary'') may not implement or continue in effect any policy 
that would restrict hospitals or other appropriate health care 
facilities from ordering and receiving COVID-19 monoclonal antibody 
therapies directly from manufacturers and distributors of such 
therapies.
    (b) Nullification of Certain Policy.--Pursuant to subsection (a), 
effective on the date of enactment of this Act, the policy under which 
the Secretary required hospitals and other facilities to work through 
State or territorial governments to receive supplies of COVID-19 
monoclonal antibody therapies allocated by the Secretary to such States 
or territories, announced by such Secretary on September 13, 2021, 
shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.51


                 THIRD AMENDMENT TO SECURITY AND LOAN AGREEMENT
                              AND ADDENDUM THERETO

                This Third Amendment ("Amendment") amends that certain Security
and Loan Agreement ("Security and Loan Agreement") and the attached Addendum
("Addendum" and together with the Security and Loan Agreement the "Agreement")
both dated June 9, 1998 between Imperial Bank ("Bank") and Alpha Microsystems
("Borrower") as follows:

1.      Section 1 of the Security and Loan Agreement is amended by deleting the
        term "75%" therefrom and substituting the term "65%" therefore.

2.      Section 1 of the Security and Loan Agreement is further amended by
        deleting the term "$2,000,000" therefrom and substituting the term
        "$4,000,000" therefore.

3.      The First sentence in Section 5 of the Addendum is hereby amended to
        read as follows:

        "Bank will advance up to 65% of Eligible Accounts up to a maximum of
        $4,000,000 provided, however, that Bank, in its sole and absolute
        discretion may adjust the foregoing advance rate to a lower amount
        deemed prudent by Bank contingent upon "dilution" exceeding 15% on an
        annual basis as determined by Bank audit."

        The remainder of Section 5 of the Addendum will remain unchanged.

4.      Except as provided above, the Agreement remains unchanged.

5.      A commitment fee of $20,000, equal to 1.00% (One Percent) of the
        $2,000,000 increase in the line of credit amount will be due upon
        execution hereof.

6.      A documentation fee of $1,500 will be due upon execution hereof.

7.      This Amendment is effective as of 7/2/99 and the parties hereby confirm
        that the Agreement as amended is in full force and effect.

        ALPHA MICROSYSTEMS                      IMPERIAL BANK

        By: /s/ Douglas J. Tullio               By:
            ---------------------------------       ----------------------------
        Title: Chairman, CEO and President      Title:
               ------------------------------          -------------------------
        By: /s/ Jeffrey J. Dunnigan
            ---------------------------------
        Title: Vice President and
               Chief Financial Officer
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS** AUSTIN February 3, 1939

**bir. c.**  **&n-tt Potter**  countyAttorney San ratricio County Yinton,Texas Dear &I-.Potter:

our letter of you ,as

Ho have interney Osneral or Texae
aelsat an aeeeemoot , L8giiaturs or iszs, ind8-

**Articile** a958

reasurer and an eesessofend

provides: %epen%snt School DistrictWIN created **by** .slatur8,

by A& of the 97th Lfigislaturs, 921,House Bill 66, found on page 1259, led See&on, and said Eill,amng other things, The bo@rCot trustees of s&i% Gregory Indepen%sae School Distriot 8r.8 hereby veatsd and Ohargedwith al1 the rights,pm8rs, privileges and duties Bonf8rrt3d tsttd imposed by the CI8neral Laws of this Stat8 upon trustee8 of independantschooldistricts areatedan% organlaedk. C. Burtt Pottsr, **February 8,**  lOJO, Page E
under the Oeneral Law8 OS this Stats." This Independent liohool Distriat, in our opinion, byvirtue OS the authority above quoted has authorityby a vote of a majority of themabers OS its Board of Tr@ees to selecta tax assessor ana ooll8otor, and suoh assessorand aolleotorcan be a person other than th8 county tax assessor and collector. Youre very truly
NO. 12-12-00242-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: WILLIAM W. ADAMS, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On July 31, 2013, this Court delivered an opinion conditionally granting the petition for 

writ of mandamus filed by William W. Adams. That opinion and corresponding order directed 

Respondent to vacate his Order on Movant’s Emergency Motion to Enforce Permanent 

Injunction and Motion for Contempt signed on May 14, 2012. Respondent has complied with 

our opinion and order of May 14, 2012.

All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus 

proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this

original proceeding is dismissed as moot.

Opinion delivered August 14, 2013.

Panel consisted of Griffith, J., Hoyle, J., and Bass, Retired J., Twelfth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

(PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 14, 2013

NO. 12-12-00242-CV

WILLIAM W. ADAMS,

Relator

v.

HON. CHARLES R. MITCHELL,

Respondent

 

 

 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed 

by WILLIAM W. ADAMS, who is the relator in Cause No.97CV-25,690, pending on the 

docket of the 273rd Judicial District Court of Shelby County, Texas. Said petition for writ of 

mandamus having been filed herein on July 16, 2012, and the same having been duly considered, 

because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ of mandamus should not issue, it is therefore 

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be, 

and the same is, hereby DISMISSED.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Griffith, J., Hoyle, J., and Bass, Retired J., Twelfth Court of Appeals,

sitting by assignment.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00433-CV

Tom Tucker

v.

Carl Bedgood and Laura Bedgood

On appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. CIV1-17046

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

December 1, 2016
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements pertaining to the ZOLL Medical Corporation 1992 Stock Option Plan(Form S-8 No. 333-68403, Form S-8 No. 33-90764, Form S-8 No. 33-56244, and Form S-8 No. 333-101839), the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-101839) and the 401(k) Saving Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-38048) and the ZOLLMedical Corporation 2001 Stock Incentive Plan (Form S-8 No. 333-101839 and Form S-8 No. 333-120310) of our report dated November 8, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ZOLL Medical Corporation included in thisAnnual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year ended October 3, 2004. 

 

/s/ ERNST& YOUNG LLP 

 

December 20, 2004 

Boston, Massachusetts
# C_2016320EN.01000102.xml

| 1.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8061 — IMS Health/Quintiles)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 320/02)

On 12 August 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8061. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8061. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Memo to the File

RE: Yaquina Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites – Tribal Coordination for Proposed Site

Designations

From: Bridgette Lohrman (ETPA – Ocean Dumping Program)

Date: May 18, 2012

March 1, 2012. EPA sent letters to the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw

Indians, Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, and Coquille Indian

Tribe inviting them to consult with EPA on our action of proposing to designate two dredged material

disposal sites approximately 2nm offshore of Yaquina Bay.  

April 30, 2012. EPA sent an email to the Tribal staff who received the letter reiterating our invitation for

consultation and attached the original letter to the email. The email stated that if EPA did not hear from

the Tribes by May 14, 2012, EPA would consider the lack of response as a lack of interest to consult.  

April 30, 2012 – Staff from the Coquille Indian Tribe and Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde

responded via email stating they do not wish to consult with EPA on this action.  

As of the date of this Memo, the Confederated Tribes of the Siletz Indians nor the Confederated Tribes

of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians have responded to EPA. Thus, EPA is considering the lack of

response a lack of interest in consultation and considering we have done our due diligence in following

our Tribal Consultation procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF FATS, INC. FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           3,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,445
<ALLOWANCES>                                       215
<INVENTORY>                                     16,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                32,455
<PP&E>                                           9,952
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,435
<BONDS>                                         73,772
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            3,347
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       114,415
<OTHER-SE>                                    (162,616)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,575
<SALES>                                         38,889
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,889
<CGS>                                           30,689
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,275
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,056
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (808)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (18,648)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (18,902)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.91)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.91)


</TABLE>
# C_2015370EN.01000201.xml

| 7.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 November 2015

(2015/C 370/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0864 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 132,41 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4600 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71765 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3839 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0830 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2715 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,026 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,02 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2544 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4545 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1294 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5204 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4342 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4212 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6412 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5314 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 243,27 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1534 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9035 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5575 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 719,76 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6797 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,981 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,2906 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,660 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1206 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0924 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,5938 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0864

JPY

Japanese yen

132,41

DKK

Danish krone

7,4600

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71765

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3839

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0830

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2715

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,026

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,02

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2544

RON

Romanian leu

4,4545

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1294

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5204

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4342

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4212

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6412

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5314

KRW

South Korean won

1 243,27

ZAR

South African rand

15,1534

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9035

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5575

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 719,76

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6797

PHP

Philippine peso

50,981

RUB

Russian rouble

69,2906

THB

Thai baht

38,660

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1206

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0924

INR

Indian rupee

71,5938

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 59 (Friday, March 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 16384]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07137]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9020-2]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564-
7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.
    Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements.
    Filed 03/16/2015 Through 03/20/2015.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20150075, Draft Supplement, FHWA, AK, Sterling Highway MP 45--
60 Project, Comment Period Ends: 05/26/2015, Contact: John Lohrey 907-
586-7418
EIS No. 20150076, Final EIS, BLM, ID, Thompson Creek Mine Expansion and 
Public Land Disposal Proposed Resource Management Plan Amendment, 
Review Period Ends: 04/27/2015, Contact: Ken Gardner 208-879-6210
EIS No. 20150077, Final EIS, USFS, CO, Eldora Mountain Resort Ski Area 
Projects, Review Period Ends: 05/04/2015, Contact: K. Reid Armstrong 
303-541-2532
EIS No. 20150078, Draft EIS, NRC, IL, Generic--License Renewal of 
Nuclear Plants, Supplement 55 Regarding Braidwood Station Units 1 and 
2, Comment Period Ends: 05/12/2015, Contact: Tam Tran 301-415-3617
EIS No. 20150079, Final EIS, NRC, TN, Generic- License Renewal of 
Nuclear Plants, Supplement 53 Regarding Sequoyah Nuclear Station Units 
1 and 2, Review Period Ends: 04/27/2015, Contact: David Drucker 301-
415-6223
EIS No. 20150080, Final EIS, BLM, CO, Proposed Resource Management Plan 
Amendment for Oil and Gas Development in the White River Field Office, 
Review Period Ends: 04/27/2015, Contact: Heather Sauls 970-878-3855
EIS No. 20150081, Second Final EIS, BLM, USFS, ID, Smoky Canyon Mine 
Panels F and G Lease and Mine Plan Modification Project, Review Period 
Ends: 04/27/2015, Contact: Diane Wheeler 208-557-5839

    The U.S. Department of the Interior's Bureau of Land Management and 
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Forest Service are joint lead 
agencies for the above project.

EIS No. 20150082, Final EIS, BR, CA, Long-term Water Transfers, Review 
Period Ends: 04/27/2015, Contact: Brad Hubbard 916-978-5204

    Dated: March 25, 2015.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2015-07137 Filed 3-26-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# C_2016171EN.01000102.xml

| 12.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7989 — Griffin/LVS II Lux XX/Redefine/Echo prime JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 171/02)

On 28 April 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7989. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7989. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>   1


                                                                EXHIBIT 10.13-01

                      STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS SERIES B

         The Stock Option Agreements Series B, each dated as of September 18,
1996 between the Company and the following employees are identical in all
material respects to Exhibit 10.13 except with respect to the number of shares
which are subject to the option:

         1.       Robert B. Terry, Jr.;
         2.       Robert F. Mecredy;
         3.       Juan de Ledebur;
         4.       David A. Apseloff; and
         5.       Gregory F. Echols.

         The Stock Option Agreements Series B, each dated as of September 18,
1996 between the Company and the following employees are identical in all
material respects to Exhibit 10.13 except (i) with respect to the number of
shares which are subject to the option and (ii) that the Agreements do not
provide for monthly vesting of the option:

         1.       Jeffrey Marlin;
         2.       Geoff E. Lonsdale;
         3.       Christopher Bailey;
         4.       Wenlong Tsang;
         5.       Bradley D. Nichols;
         6.       William E. Tait;
         7.       Charles L. Belitz;
         8.       Frank Socolow, Jr.;
         9.       Gregg A. Rowland;
         10.      John D'Araujo, Jr.;
         11.      James W. Hall;
         12.      Lifan Hua;
         13.      Michael J. McKean;
         14.      Michael A. Wenson;
         15.      Rameshchandra Patel;
         16.      John A. Morelli;
         17.      Robert J. Combs;
         18.      Robert A. Dare, Jr.;
         19.      William E. Jordan, Jr.;
         20.      Robert Rivers;
         21.      Christopher S. Bryan;
         22.      Theresa A. Reed;
         23.      Darcey Tatum;
         24.      Ed Schumacher;
         25.      Wen Li;
         26.      Charles Kenyon, Jr.;
         27.      David F. Pritchett;
         28.      Michael Leonhardi;
         29.      Donald W. Harvey; and
         30.      Larry David Walker.

         The Stock Option Agreement Series B, dated as of December 23, 1996
between the Company and Charles N. Bowen, is identical in all material respects
to Exhibit 10.13 except (i) with respect to the number of shares which are
subject to the option and (ii) that the Agreement does not provide for monthly
vesting of the option.
<PAGE>   2

         The Stock Option Agreements Series B, each dated as of December 30,
1996 between the Company and the following employees are identical in all
material respects to Exhibit 10.13 except (i) with respect to the number of
shares which are subject to the option and (ii) that the Agreements do not
provide for monthly vesting of the options:

         1.       James S. Parker; and
         2.       Christopher K. Scullion.