alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                      THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
                             RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Firoz Jinnah, Chief Executive Officer of Exotics.com Inc., certify that:

     (1)  I have reviewed the report on Form 10-QSB of Exotics.com Inc.;

     (2)  Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any
          untrue  statement of a material  fact or omit to state a material fact
          necessary to make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances
          under which such  statements were made, not misleading with respect to
          the  period  covered  by  this  quarterly  report;

     (3)  Based on my knowledge,  the financial statements,  and other financial
          information  included in this quarterly report,  fairly present in all
          material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and
          cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods  presented in
          this quarterly report;



Dated:   October 28, 2002


/s/ Firoz Jinnah
----------------
Firoz Jinnah
President
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

S.M.E.,

Petitioner

v.

R.J.E.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 449 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00009

- CR Jose Valentine FACIO , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017CR1159 Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Delivered and Filed: December 5, 2018 MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED A jury found appellant Jose Valentine Facio guilty of aggravated robbery with a deadly
weapon
. Facio elected to have the trial court assess punishment in the event the jury found him guilty. The trial court sentenced Facio to twenty

- five years’ confinement. Facio’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which he concludes this a ppeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), and Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Facio was provided wit h a copy04

- 18

- 00009

- CR

- 2

- of the brief and informed of his right to obtain a copy of the appellate record and file his own brief.
See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 20 (Tex. C rim. App. 2014); see also Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

– 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Appointed counsel also provided Facio with a form which he could sign, date, and file with this court in order to o btain a copy of the record. See Kelly , 436 S.W.3d at 319

- 20

. Facio filed neither a request for the record nor a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we conclude there is no reversible error and agree with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824, 826

– 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Facio’s counsel and affirm the trial court’s judgment. Se e id. ; Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Facio wish to seek further review of this

c ase in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after eith er the day our judgment is rendered or the day the last timely motion for rehearing or timely motion for en banc reconsideration is overruled by this court. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Proce dure. See id. R. 68.4. Marialyn Barnard, Justice Do Not Publish
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00830-CV

Trisun Healthcare, LLC and Brian Threadgill, Appellants

v.

Michael Kumets, Pavel Kumets, and Strul Kumets, Individually and as next friend for

Yevgeniya Kumets, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 368TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 10-139-C368, HONORABLE BURT CARNES, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellants Trisun Healthcare, LLC and Brian Threadgill have filed an unopposed

motion to dismiss as moot their accelerated interlocutory appeal against appellees Michael Kumets,

Pavel Kumets, and Strul Kumets, Individually and as next friend for Yevgeniya Kumets. We grant

the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

 

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: May 5, 2011
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 30, 2016

d1121

Order 

Clerk

November 30, 2016

153089

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153089

COA: 329571

Wayne CC: 10-001388-FH

STEVEN KEITH BOU,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 23, 2015 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
**EXHIBIT 32.2**









**CERTIFICATION**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Limelight Media
      Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005,
      as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), Joseph Martinez, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:











(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
            November
                23, 2005
            
            By:
            /s/Joseph
                MartinezJoseph
                MartinezChief
                Financial Officer








This
        certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7170

WAYMOND L. JENKINS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JAMES S. GILMORE, III, Governor of Virginia; JOHN R. ALDERMAN, Chairman, Virginia Parole Board, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-99-241-3) Submitted: November 4, 1999 Decided: November 10, 1999 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Waymond L. Jenkins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Waymond L. Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Jenkins v. Gilmore , No. CA-99-241-3 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation

# TIME AND DATE: 

9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Thursday, April 16, 2015.

# PLACE: 

The offices of the Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation, 130 South Scott Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701.

# STATUS: 

This meeting of the Board of Trustees will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

(1) Chair's Remarks; (2) Executive Director's Remarks; (3) Overview of Trustee Responsibilities; (4) Board Officers & Committee Elections; (5) Consent Agenda Approval, including program reports of the Education Programs, U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, and Udall Center for Studies in Public Policy/Native Nations Institute for Leadership, Management, and Policy/Udall Archives, and resolutions related to the Operating Procedures of the Board of Trustees and the Parks in Focus Fund, Inc. (6) Financial and Internal Controls Update; (7) Ethics Briefing; (8) Program Panel & Discussion; and (9) Appropriations Update.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Philip J. Lemanski, Executive Director, 130 South Scott Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85701, (520) 901-8500.

Dated: March 16, 2015.

Philip J. Lemanski,

Executive Director, Morris K. Udall and Stewart L. Udall Foundation, and Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-06556 Filed 3-18-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6820-FN-P
.:..- • , ~ , • , r 

REF ID:A67033. 

3 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT 

State Dept program !or permanent 

Security Off 1cers 

AS- CM- IN 14065 

To. ASA 

FromAsA Europe 

BRIEF SUMMARY 

CLASSIFICATION NUMBER 

Radiograms ASA Europe 

Date of Commumcabont 11 Sept. 1947 

Date of Basic Document• 

Recent comYersation with Alex S.Prengel former menber of ASA and 

now designated as security officer tor Ameb1can Embassy at Prague. 

Understand from him that State Department has initiated program to 

provide permanent security officers at each embassy for purpose of inspecting physical plant for wire tapping, personnel,cryptograph1c security 

and security procedures in general. Recommend that State Dept. be 

approached with view towards authorizing the*r security officers at 

Embassies to include ialitary Attaches as part of general security 

responsibilities. Believe this would eliminate much duplication and 

provide for better security form standpoint of those factors other than 

cryptographic security of Military Attaches now covered by ASA. 

Class1f1er Miss Meece Routed to File 

Typist h."iss Meece Date of Classifying~ 17 Sept. 194? 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS 

FILE 

stallations 

Department State 

WDGAS fotm No, 1493 1Ottober1946 44052 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 04-16-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3
December 1, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

BENJAMIN WALLS, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00776-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The 

record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the 

appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# C_2015402EN.01000102.xml

| 4.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7811 — Koch Industries/BDT Capital Partners/Truck-Lite)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 402/02)

On 27 November 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7811. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7811. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1955

JEROME WANT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STEVEN MARK FREI, Attorney; SICKLES, FREI & MIMS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District 

Judge. (1:16-cv-00660-LMB-IDD)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Want, Appellant Pro Se. John A. C. Keith, Laurie Kirkland, 

BLANKINGSHIP & KEITH, PC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Want seeks to appeal the district court’s orders

denying his motion to recuse the district court judge assigned to 

his case, his motion to appoint counsel, and his motion for 

reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over 

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory 

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-

46 (1949). The orders Want seeks to appeal are neither final 

orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
November 22, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THAI XUAN VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant

NO. 14-15-00873-CV V.

HIEN LUU AND TRANG PHONG, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellees, Hien Luu and 

Trang Phong, signed, August 7, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. 

The record shows that the judgment is not final. We therefore order the appeal 

DISMISSED.

We order appellant, Thai Xuan Village Condominium Association, Inc., to 

pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hudson's Grill International, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, David L. Osborn, the President of
Hudson's Grill International, Inc., certify that:

(i) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | (Registrant)

HUDSON'S GRILL INTERNATIONAL,
INC.

By: s/s David L. Osborn

David L. Osborn, President

Date:     November 15, 2004
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

f\sec\o01.040930
# C_2015370EN.01000101.xml

| 7.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 370/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/1

---

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration

(Case M.7737 — Honeywell/Elster)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 370/01)

(Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004)

On 9 October 2015, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration between Honeywell International Inc. and Elster Division. On 3 November 2015, the notifying party informed the Commission that it withdrew its notification.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

          - 16 CFR Part 4

# AGENCY:

Federal Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Final rules; technical correction.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Trade Commission published final rules on March 23, 2015, revising certain of its rules of practice. This document makes a technical correction to those final rules.

# DATES:

Effective March 31, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

G. Richard Gold, Attorney, (202) 326-3355, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20580.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The Commission published a document in the                     **Federal Register**                     of March 23, 2015 (80 FR 15157), revising certain of its rules of practice. The document contained an incorrect paragraph reference in amendatory instruction 17 that referenced “(a)(10)(viii)” instead of “(b)(10)(viii).” This document corrections the erroneous paragraph reference.                

# List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 4

      - Administrative practice and procedure
      - Freedom of information
      - Public record

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Federal Trade Commission amends title 16, chapter I, subchapter A of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

# PART 4—MISCELLANEOUS RULES

1. The authority citation for part 4 continues to read as follows: 

Authority:15 U.S.C. 46, unless otherwise noted.

2. Amend § 4.9 by revising paragraph (b)(10)(viii) to read as follows: 

§ 4.9 

* * * * *

(b) * * *

(10) * * *

(viii) The Commission's annual report submitted after the end of each fiscal year, summarizing its work during the year (with copies obtainable from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402) and any other annual reports made to Congress on activities of the Commission as required by law;

* * * * *

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-07117 Filed 3-30-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6750-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND TREASURER
  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the President and the Principal Financial Officer of Kushi
Natural Foods Corp. (the "Company") each hereby certifies that to his knowledge
on the date hereof:

(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated:  November 15, 2004        /s/ DR. EUGENE STRICKER
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Dr. Eugene Stricker,
                                 President and Chief Financial Executive Officer


Dated:  November 15, 2004        /s/ DANIEL A. FRANCE
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                 Daniel A. France,
                                 Treasurer and Principal Accounting Officer

                                       12