alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER & CONTROLLER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Hilda Kwena, Treasurer & Controller of Comtex News Network, Inc. (the "Company")
certifies in her capacity as an officer of the Company that she has reviewed the
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for period ended September 30, 2005 and that
to the best of her knowledge:

        1.      the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.


November 14, 2005                     /s/ Hilda Kwena
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Hilda Kwena
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                                      (Treasurer & Controller)
- REF ID:A65475 

t-; - ,-..... -, I. I 

' I 

r ,--. --... ,.___ - •I ., •.1,-~ I I I I 

MAGIC DIPLOMATIC SUIUIARY 

No. 981 

l Dec 44 

:•I !1' ,. 

,. I ''t~ I _, ~)" 

E. MIBCBLLABEOUS 

l. Chinese report on Allied plans 1n Chinas 

On 18 Bovember the Chinese Consul 1n Loa Angeles 

sent the tolloving message to Chungking: 

"The United Sta.tea Marine Corps is now recruiting 

e~erJVh.are in the United States persona with a 

knowledge ot the coastal dialects ot Puld.en, includiq the dialects or the Amo7 area. On 16 November 

the7 sent an otticer to the Consulate to request our 

aaaiatanoe." 

Bote1 There 'is evidence that the Japanese ar'e reading 

some Chinese codes, but none that the7 can read the one 1n which 

th1s message was sent (a medium aecurit7 a7stem, appe.rentl7 the 

best 1n the poaaeaa1on ot the Los Angeles Conaul.118). 

,' 

- ' , I 

I I ', 

r I f r- I I -

t : _) I 1 \ I--. l 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

\ 

i 

\, 

' " '\
Exhibit 32.2



SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Yu, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2005 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended
March 31, 2005.



/s/ Carol YuCarol Yu, Chief Financial OfficerMay 2, 2005




-62-
~~0 w( CkQM ~ U5£As 

UD a_0 -P 1 ()VJ 

NAMB ~ I I 

2D2- s~ 0 o~t~ 

d0J 531 0S Y ( 

'l~tCH\ ~€.42-~ ~D J..1N<:nNj {)J_L 508 8 1 ~ 8 6D7 

;1/a ry r1 vrl"o•':f'---~a,- L n ~ k--!..'vt .3..?>1-d-1 Y -.J.sct :;-

~ 

SASotJ L&u..c..k ~Cl<:HEQ) MA-RTIN 1-c '!> -'l t 6-5 8/C 

o~ ~t!a., ~~c.ov cWJ--~lPI-4415 

(fkft Leof"'j fJtt/ 0 Pf\ /1--M'/J '2 "2 -.sbb -I b 1g 

b. cr..r'\J whl r:wJ> )L i ~jo p~ --r t BZ-(!":) 2lJ).. I s-(d. - 2-21 sl )OlA_:) '\-h.rS<5 H t:rnf (J P I C) Od- '5 (.l! - 65'-1 ( 

ft~~~;{ J/rb,._ /5m1J 1f'Z 11.)..->3'1-1 

cJul<.~ FrPelid\e( f{6 513 .1'i3. Z5"31 

C(Ayo/::J n l:M ro V) 1 n kJ 5oo -702 - 1-?tCsJ 

~v/ fl/q!'c4l<r ffG-L·LAe; ';/JJ.-<r?~-s>o&, ~ f-\rJ {2P-u e734 ;lc0l- 6Y'-~ 7-.s~ 

~ C\el~ ~V\~ cc.YA-- d-t:> Sto '-f- 38"1 o
# C_2014436EN.01000101.xml

| 5.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7011 — SNCF / SNCB / Thalys JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 436/01)

On 19 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7011. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7011. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016037EN.01000101.xml

| 30.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 37/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7844 — ACEK/Sumitomo/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 37/01)

On 26 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7844. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7844. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7023

JASON THOMAS ROBERTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NAPH CARE MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, Jail Medical Services; 

VIRGINIA BEACH JAIL,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:16-cv-00213-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Thomas Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jason Thomas Roberts seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failure 

to comply with the court’s earlier order to return a collection 

of fees form. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction 

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

June 8, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed on July 28, 2016.* 

Because Roberts failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to 

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We deny Roberts’ motions for appointment of 

counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 

266, 276 (1988). 
3

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIQN.. . ; i 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS · ·· 

WASHINGTON, DC 

TRAVEL GROUP, INC., D/B/A REPUBLIC AIR TRAVEL 

AND SCOT SPENCER 

AIRLIFT GROUP, INC. 

AND RICHARD BERNARD 

Unauthorized Air Transportation, Unfair and Deceptive 

Practices and Unfair Methods of Competition, and 

Violations of Public Charter Rules 

EXPRESS ONE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 

Unfair and Deceptive Practices and Unfair Methods of 

Competition, and Violations of Public Charter Rules 

Enforcement Proceeding 

STATUS REPORT 

- ~ t -~ ,""'; ,-

i ' ~ : . ~ 

r· , ..... 

i ~ : :_; ~i 

DOT -OST -1995-272 

formerly 

Docket 49233 

The Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Aviation Enforcement and 

Proceedings ("Enforcement Office"), pursuant to Your Honor's March 22, 2006, Order 

staying this proceeding, files this report detailing the current status of this proceeding and 

settlement negotiations. 

The Department has not ruled on the outstanding motions filed by Respondents 

and opposed by the Enforcement Office in Ascend Aviation Group, Docket OST-2004-

17486. 
/' 

2 

There have been no further settlement discussions. 

Date: November 30, 2012. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Samuel Podberesky 

Assistant General Counsel for 

Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

WilliamJ.Wagn~\ Senior 

·-~~~ Trial Att~ ~ {j 

United States Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Room 96-429 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202-366-9342 

FAX: 202-366-7152 
3 

Docket No. DOT-OST-1995-272 

I hereby certify that on this 30th day ofNovember, 2012, a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Status Report was served in the following manner to the following: 

Original 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

By First Class Mail 

The Honorable Ronnie A Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2142 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

By First Class Mail 

Scot Spencer 

SBD Aircraft Services 

255 S Leland Norton Way 

Sam Bernardino, CA 92408
### FILEDINCOURTOFAPPEALS 12th C.nurXcfAppeals D'tr.trict

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 FILE COPY

8/26/2015 COA No. 12-13-00382-CR 

### JOHNSON, DANIEL WILBUR Tr. Ct. No. 007-1059-13 PD-0452-15 

## On this day, the Appellant's Pro Se petition for discretionary review has been refused. Abel Acosta, Clerk 12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 

### 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 

### TYLER, TX 75701 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
# C_2015112EN.01000301.xml

| 2.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/3

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,05 % on 1 April 2015

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 April 2015

(2015/C 112/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0755 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4708 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72850 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2541 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0426 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6695 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,543 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 298,52 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0608 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4130 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8064 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4153 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3632 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3382 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4472 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4696 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 187,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0011 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,6662 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6483 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 021,81 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9785 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 47,917 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,4363 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,965 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3994 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3847 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,2161 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0755

JPY

Japanese yen

129,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4708

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72850

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2541

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0426

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6695

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,543

HUF

Hungarian forint

298,52

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0608

RON

Romanian leu

4,4130

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8064

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4153

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3632

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3382

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4472

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4696

KRW

South Korean won

1 187,67

ZAR

South African rand

13,0011

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,6662

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6483

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 021,81

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9785

PHP

Philippine peso

47,917

RUB

Russian rouble

62,4363

THB

Thai baht

34,965

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3994

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3847

INR

Indian rupee

67,2161

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
#### Zimmerman vs. Turner and another.

*Only one writ of error to one judgment.*

Where, on a writ of error, the judgment has been affirmed, plaintiff in error cannot have a new bill of exceptions settled, so as to present a question not presented by the former, and sue out a new writ.

EBROE to the Circuit Court for *Ozaukee*County.

The action below was ejectment by *Zimmerman.*The cause was brought to this court at the September term, 1867, on a bill of exceptions, from which it appeared that a deed to the plaintiff from the state and county, executed by the clerk of the board of supervisors of said county, and sealed with his official seal, was offered in evidence, but ruled out because not sealed with his *private*seal. It did not appear, however, that this was a tax deed; and this court therefore affirmed the judgment of dismissal rendered by the court below, without considering the question whether a tax deed of the same date would have required the private seal of the clerk. *22*Wis. 370. The manner in which the cause again came to this court,- on a second writ of error, will appear from the opinion.

*Geo. W. Foster,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. A. Pors,*for defendants in error.

Dixon, C. J.

Counsel for the defendants in error object, that this is a second writ of error sued out upon the same judgment, which judgment was affirmed by this court upon the former writ, and therefore that this writ will not lie, but should be dismissed. An inspection of the records now in this court shows that the objection is well founded. This is a writ of error to the same judgment which was affirmed by this court in *Zimmerman v. Turner and*another, *22*Wis. 370. After the judgment was there affirmed, and the cause re-' *484mancled, the plaintiff in error procured the bill of exceptions to be resettled, or amended, so as to show that the deed in question was a tax deed, and then sued ont this writ of error for the purpose of reviewing a question not presented in the former one by reason of the imperfect character of the bill. It requires no argument, or citation of authorities, to show that a judgment of this court cannot be thus avoided or set aside, and that a second writ of error cannot, under such circumstances, be issued. The writ of error must be dismissed.

*By the Court.*—Writ dismissed.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
				  to 
			 Certificate Holders

			 Scheduled        Unscheduled                Ending
Class        Interest     Pricipal          Principal               Balance
<S>     <C>             <C>             <C>                  <C>
A1          946,238.81    814,651.56       976,832.86         39,398,515.59 
A2        1,515,947.38  1,129,199.17     1,354,000.79         63,368,800.05 
A3          831,347.25    474,321.30       568,749.46         34,956,929.24 
A4          116,666.68          0.00             0.00          5,000,000.00 
A5          161,676.68          0.00             0.00          6,929,000.00 
A6          536,666.68          0.00             0.00         23,000,000.00 
A7          184,426.68          0.00             0.00          7,904,000.00 
A8          638,041.37  1,051,870.73     1,261,277.76         25,853,851.51 
A9        1,354,453.32          0.00             0.00         58,048,000.00 
A10         463,835.86    256,088.86             0.00         19,717,911.13 
APO               0.00     60,574.01        88,035.07          4,302,417.61 
AR                0.58         46.12            53.88                  0.00 
M            89,195.63     49,245.88             0.00          3,791,754.11 
B1           71,361.15     39,399.27             0.00          3,033,600.73 
B2           32,092.78     17,718.77             0.00          1,364,281.22 
B3           21,410.66     11,821.07             0.00            910,178.94 
B4           14,281.52      7,884.99             0.00            607,115.02 
B5           21,413.04     10,032.96             0.00            910,279.88 

Total     6,999,056.07  3,922,854.69     4,248,949.82  






</TABLE>
# C_2016171EN.01000201.xml

| 12.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 May 2016

(2016/C 171/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1409 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 124,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4409 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78958 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2920 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1099 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,022 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,30 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4244 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4915 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3801 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5474 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4686 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8542 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6763 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5610 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 332,79 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,2737 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4212 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5218 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 155,05 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6035 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,055 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,0267 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,228 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9517 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5313 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,9935 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1409

JPY

Japanese yen

124,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4409

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78958

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2920

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1099

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,022

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,30

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4244

RON

Romanian leu

4,4915

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3801

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5474

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4686

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8542

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6763

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5610

KRW

South Korean won

1 332,79

ZAR

South African rand

17,2737

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4212

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5218

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 155,05

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6035

PHP

Philippine peso

53,055

RUB

Russian rouble

75,0267

THB

Thai baht

40,228

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9517

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5313

INR

Indian rupee

75,9935

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

LLANO FINANCING GROUP LLC, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-5087

)

GARY NEESE, an individual; and )

MICHAEL L. KRONENBERGER, an )

individual, )

)

Appellees. )

)

Opinion filed June 8, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee 

County; John E. Duryea, Jr., Judge.

Robert J. Hauser of Pankauski Hauser 

PLLC, West Palm Beach, for Appellant. 

Alex Tirado-Luciano, Joan Carlos Wizel, and 

Sandra Ferrin of Lydecker Diaz, Miami, for 

Appellee Gary Neese. 

No appearance for Appellee Michael L. 

Kronenberger.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Llano Fin. Grp., LLC v. Yespy, 228 So. 3d 108 (Fla. 4th 

DCA 2017); Llano Fin. Grp., LLC v. Petit, 230 So. 3d 141 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

SILBERMAN, KELLY, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCWC-15-0000403 

30-NOV-2016 

09:22 AM 

SCWC-15-0000403
 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

STATE OF HAWAI'I,


Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellant,
 

vs.
 

BRANDON VACCHELLI,


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee,
 

and
 

JOSHUA VACCHELLI,


Defendant.
 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
 

(CAAP-15-0000403; CR. NO. 13-1-0745)
 

ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.,


and Circuit Judge Chang, in place of Wilson, J., recused)


Petitioner/Defendant-Appellee’s Application for Writ of 

Certiorari, filed on October 19, 2016, is hereby rejected. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, November 30, 2016. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna 

/s/ Richard W. Pollack 

/s/ Gary W.B. Chang