alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. No. 35,512

5 ISAAC LISTER, 

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY

8 John A. Dean, Jr., District Judge

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

10 Santa Fe, NM

11 John Kloss, Assistant Attorney General

12 Albuquerque, NM

13 for Appellee

14 Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender

15 B. Douglas Wood III, Assistant Appellate Defender

16 Santa Fe, NM

17 for Appellant

18 MEMORANDUM OPINION

19 VIGIL, Chief Judge.

20 {1} Defendant has appealed from convictions for fraud and conspiracy. In our
2

1 second notice of proposed summary disposition, we proposed to affirm in part and

2 reverse in part, specifically with respect to an apparent double jeopardy problem. 

3 {2} The State has filed a responsive memorandum, indicating that it concurs with

4 our proposed summary disposition. Defendant has filed a responsive memorandum

5 in which he concurs with our proposed summary disposition relative to the double

6 jeopardy issue, but continues to assert that he received ineffective assistance of

7 counsel. For the reasons previously stated, we remain unpersuaded. However, our

8 disposition as to this matter is without prejudice to Defendant’s ability to bring such

9 a claim by way of habeas corpus. See State v. Arrendondo, 2012-NMSC-013, ¶ 44,

10 278 P.3d 517 (declining to review an ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal,

11 without prejudice to a defendant’s right to make an adequate record and seek relief in

12 the context of a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding). 

13 {3} Accordingly, for the reasons previously stated, we affirm Defendant’s

14 conviction for fraud and one of Defendant’s convictions for conspiracy, but vacate the

15 other conviction for conspiracy. We remand to the district court for resentencing.

16 {4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

17 __________________________________

18 MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
3

1 WE CONCUR:

2 ____________________________

3 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

4 ____________________________

5 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
EXHIBIT 99.1


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
for the  quarterly  period  ended  March  31,  2002,  fully  complies  with  the
requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934
and that  information  contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents in all
material  respects  the  financial   condition  and  results  of  operations  of
Exotics.com.


Date: October 31, 2002                              /s/ Firoz Jinnah
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Name: FIROZ JINNAH
                                                  Title: Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00009-CR

Jose Valentine FACIO,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR1159

Honorable Joey Contreras, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 5, 2018

MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED; AFFIRMED

A jury found appellant Jose Valentine Facio guilty of aggravated robbery with a deadly 

weapon. Facio elected to have the trial court assess punishment in the event the jury found him 

guilty. The trial court sentenced Facio to twenty-five years’ confinement. 

Facio’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a motion to withdraw and a brief in which 

he concludes this appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978), 

and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Facio was provided with a copy 
04-18-00009-CR

- 2 -

of the brief and informed of his right to obtain a copy of the appellate record and file his own brief. 

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Nichols v. State, 954 

S.W.2d 83, 85–86 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 

n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, no pet.). Appointed counsel also provided Facio with a form 

which he could sign, date, and file with this court in order to obtain a copy of the record. See 

Kelly, 436 S.W.3d at 319-20. Facio filed neither a request for the record nor a pro se brief. 

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we conclude there is no reversible error and 

agree with counsel the appeal is wholly frivolous. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We therefore grant the motion to withdraw filed by Facio’s counsel and 

affirm the trial court’s judgment. See id.; Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.—San 

Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1996, 

no pet.). 

No substitute counsel will be appointed. Should Facio wish to seek further review of this 

case in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, he must either retain an attorney to file a petition for 

discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for 

discretionary review must be filed within thirty days after either the day our judgment is rendered 

or the day the last timely motion for rehearing or timely motion for en banc reconsideration is 

overruled by this court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be 

filed with the clerk of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See id. R. 68.3. Any petition for 

discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Rule 68.4 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. See id. R. 68.4.

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Do Not Publish
## Saratoga Aerial Photo and Video - Phantom 2 Vision Plus - Flight Checklist

Planning 1. Plan flight paths and design shots for video or photography in advance. 2. Use Google Maps to determine distance to nearest airport. 3. Notify Airport of flight time, maximum height and location of UAS operations in advance if it is within 5 miles of flight area. 4. Charge Main batteries, Range extender battery, and iPod battery the evening before. 5. Check alkaline batteries in radio transmitter. 6. Inspect Phantom for any visible mechanical issues. 7. Make sure SD card has sufficient capacity and is properly inserted into Phantom. 8. Setup DJi iPod app for proper camera/video settings in advance.

Arrival and setup

After takeoff 1. Hover approximately ten feet above the ground to confirm Phantom is under control. 2. Verify all sticks operate correctly while in hover. 3. Fly Phantom approximately 30 feet away and land. 4. Takeoff again rise to approximately 30 feet, then fly home and land again. 5. Verify at least 5 satellites are still connected to Phantom. 6. Takeoff again and complete mission.

Pre-Landing 1. Camera - Full Up 2. Stop video recording 3. Landing Zone Clear and Safe

Post-Landing when replacing main battery and returning to flight immediately

End of operations 1. Locate and move to safe launch and recovery position. 2. Place case on level surface and place work mat next to it. 3. Unpack Phantom, battery, radio, and lanyard for radio and place on mat. 4. Install lanyard and attach iPod to radio transmitter. 5. Range Extender - On 6. Radio Transmitter - On - Antenna - Up 7. Toggle switches both full up 8. Remove Gimbal lock and lens cap. 9. Insert main battery. 10. Main Battery - On - Verify Full Charge. 11. Connect to Saratoga Aerial wi-fi in iPod settings, Launch DJi app and verify connection and video feed. 12. Camera - Full Up 13. Verify that there are at least 5 satellite connections. 14. Check battery level indications within app to verify they are sufficient. 15. If new flight location, perform compass calibration procedure. 16. If recording video, start recording. 17. Takeoff

1. Remove and replace main battery. 2. Verify wi-fi connection in iPod settings 3. Verify the DJI app has connection to range extender 4. Verify that there are still at least 5 satellite connections 5. Verify battery levels within DJI app 6. If recording video, start recording. 7. Takeoff

1. Main Battery - Off 2. Radio Transmitter - Off 3. Range Extender - Off 4. iPod off 5. Remove props 6. Install Gimbal lock and lens cap. 7. If necessary, notify airport tower of end of operations.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICERS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906



The following certification shall not be deemed filed for
purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filings.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for the period ended June 30,
2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, each of the undersigned officers of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his respective knowledge:



(1)
the accompanying report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated for the periods presented therein.



Date: August 29, 2005



/S/ Richard K. WilliamsRichard K. WilliamsChief Executive Officer




Date: August 29, 2005



/S/ Brian R. McDonaldBrian R. McDonaldChief Financial Officer




A signed
original of the above certification has been provided to Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated and will be retained by Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600317

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JORGE L. LUGODIAZ

Corporal (E-4), United States Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Colonel James K. Carberry, USMC.

For Appellant: Commander Richard E.N. Federico, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 30 November 2016

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, HUTCHISON, and GROHARING, Appellate Military 

Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

The supplemental promulgating order will reflect that only the service 

of confinement in excess of 60 months was deferred until 25 August 

2016, when it was then suspended pursuant to the terms of the 

pretrial agreement. United States v. Crumpley, 49 M.J. 538, 539 (N-M. 

Ct. Crim. App. 1998).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
January 20, 2016

Dear Mr. Celedon:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA

− 2015

− 5320). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has b een submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary in formation), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exe mptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 2/3/16. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267–2999.

Sincerely,

/S/ Program Analyst
# C_2015049EN.01000102.xml

| 12.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 49/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 49/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7424 — CCMP/INEOS/PQ)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 49/02)

On 9 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7424. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7424. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies thatto his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal periodended September 30, 2009 of Allstate Life Insurance Company filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of Allstate Life InsuranceCompany.

 

 
| November 10,  2009 |                                               |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                    | /s/  George E. Ruebenson                           |
|                    | George E. Ruebenson                                |
|                    | Chief  Executive Officer                           |
|                    |                                               |
|                    |                                               |
|                    | /s/  John C. Pintozzi                              |
|                    | John  C. Pintozzi                                  |
|                    | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

E-5

----
Mike Coryell 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Mike ... 

Debbie Morford [debbie@optiblendindustries.com] 

Wednesday, April 03,201311:51 AM 

milesecon@midrivers.com 

'Mike And~rson' 

EAS OptiBiend t f3 

Here is a short note. OptiBiend Industries would benefit from reestablishing air service from Miles City to Denver. Prior, 

the connections between Miles City and Denver facilitated travel from Miles City to our other offices in Texas including 

our corporate office near Houston, TX. Having access to a major hub also allows travel between plants from MT and 

WY /UT and in TX. With our new plant in Ohio, this would also benefit access. Currently it takes two days of travel just 

to get here or there with overnight likely in Billings and a rental car. This does not provide time efficiency nor access 

needed. OptiBiend Industries would support and benefit should air service be reestablished and maintained to Denver. 

I hope this is what you were looking for. Good luck Mike. 

Debbie Morford 

OptiBiend Industries Inc. 

2804 Valley Drive East 

Miles City, Montana 59301 

Office (406)-234-5045 

Fax (406)-234-5046 

debbie@optiblendindustries.com 

1
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Osborn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hudson's Grill International, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the periods presented in this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial
reporting.

|Date: December 4, 2007 | /s/David L. Osborn

[Signature]

President
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------

f\sec\o01.070930
# C_2016207EN.01000201.xml

| 10.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 June 2016

(2016/C 207/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1343 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 120,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4362 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78438 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2433 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0916 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2489 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,44 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3321 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5095 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2850 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5250 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4459 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8047 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5936 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5336 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 316,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,8160 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4405 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5360 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 073,44 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5911 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,188 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,8220 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,950 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8378 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6766 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,6925 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1343

JPY

Japanese yen

120,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4362

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78438

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2433

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0916

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2489

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,44

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3321

RON

Romanian leu

4,5095

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2850

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5250

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4459

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8047

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5936

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5336

KRW

South Korean won

1 316,56

ZAR

South African rand

16,8160

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4405

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5360

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 073,44

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5911

PHP

Philippine peso

52,188

RUB

Russian rouble

72,8220

THB

Thai baht

39,950

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8378

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6766

INR

Indian rupee

75,6925

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---