alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15806-15807]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06792]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-PWRO-KALA-17793; PPPWKALA00] [PPMPSPD1Z.YM0000]


Notice of April 21, 2015, Meeting for Kalaupapa National 
Historical Park Advisory Commission

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Meeting notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: As required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 
Appendix 1-16), the National Park Service is giving notice of the April 
21, 2015, meeting of the Kalaupapa National Historical Park Advisory 
Commission.

DATES: The public meeting of the Kalaupapa National Historical Park 
Advisory Commission will be held on Tuesday, April 21, 2015, at 9:45 
a.m. (HAWAII STANDARD TIME).

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Paschoal Hall, Kalaupapa 
National

[[Page 15807]]

Historical Park, Kalaupapa, Hawaii 96742.
    Agenda: The Commission meeting will consist of the following:

1. Approval of Agenda
2. Approval of February 1, 2013, Minutes
3. Superintendent's Report
4. Draft General Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement 
Presentation
5. Memorial Update
6. Public Comments

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Further information concerning this 
meeting may be obtained from the Designated Federal Official Rosa Key, 
Acting Superintendent, Kalaupapa National Historical Park, P.O. Box 
2222, Kalaupapa, Hawaii 96742, telephone (808) 567-6802, ext. 1100.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. 
Interested persons may make oral/written presentations to the 
Commission or file written statements. Such requests should be made to 
the Acting Superintendent at least seven days prior to the meeting. 
Before including your address, telephone number, email address, or 
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be 
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying 
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you may 
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying 
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be 
able to do so.

    Dated: March 18, 2015.
Alma Ripps,
Chief, Office of Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-06792 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4310-EE-P
# C_2016201EN.01000301.xml

| 7.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 June 2016

(2016/C 201/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1349 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 121,58 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4377 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78720 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2460 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1051 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2935 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,45 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3776 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5192 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3014 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5417 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4665 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8154 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6378 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5424 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 323,00 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,0065 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4520 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5075 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 162,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6472 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,398 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,1968 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,028 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9934 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 21,0626 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,9995 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1349

JPY

Japanese yen

121,58

DKK

Danish krone

7,4377

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78720

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2460

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1051

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2935

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,45

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3776

RON

Romanian leu

4,5192

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3014

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5417

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4665

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8154

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6378

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5424

KRW

South Korean won

1 323,00

ZAR

South African rand

17,0065

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4520

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5075

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 162,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6472

PHP

Philippine peso

52,398

RUB

Russian rouble

74,1968

THB

Thai baht

40,028

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9934

MXN

Mexican peso

21,0626

INR

Indian rupee

75,9995

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 24.7**

 

**POWER OF ATTORNEY**

 

KNOW ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E.Sulentic, Derek R. McClain, Arlin E. Gaffner and J. Christopher Kirk and eachof them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitutionand resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on hisbehalf, as a director or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell CrowCompany, a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”), the Corporation’s AnnualReport on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005, and to sign any or allamendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto,and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and ExchangeCommission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with orwithout the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and everyact and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, asfully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or theirsubstitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

 
|   | /s/  JAMES R. ERWIN |
|--------|---------------------|
|   | James  R. Erwin     |

 

----
# C_2016187EN.01000201.xml

| 26.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 May 2016

(2016/C 187/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1146 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,79 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4369 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,75925 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2651 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1049 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2945 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,028 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,29 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4205 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5091 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2884 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5475 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4608 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6534 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6488 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5372 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 317,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,4749 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3136 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4968 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 203,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5711 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,109 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,2362 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,768 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9681 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,5022 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,1000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1146

JPY

Japanese yen

122,79

DKK

Danish krone

7,4369

GBP

Pound sterling

0,75925

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2651

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1049

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2945

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,028

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,29

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4205

RON

Romanian leu

4,5091

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2884

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5475

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4608

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6534

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6488

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5372

KRW

South Korean won

1 317,16

ZAR

South African rand

17,4749

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3136

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4968

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 203,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5711

PHP

Philippine peso

52,109

RUB

Russian rouble

73,2362

THB

Thai baht

39,768

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9681

MXN

Mexican peso

20,5022

INR

Indian rupee

75,1000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### Demier vs. Durand.

A bill of exceptions was duly settled and signed by the judge, both parties appearing. Afterwards the appellant’s counsel persuaded the judge to sign another bill of exceptions. It appeared that no notice was given of the settlement of the second bill; and the court refused to consider it as part of the record. <

A motion to dismiss the appeal for the reason that the matters contained in the first bill of exceptions were blended in the printed case with matters which belonged only to the second bill, was denied, on the ground that it was possible to distinguish the two bills as printed.

¡This court will not review the finding of facts by the court below, even though the evidence brought up does not sustain it, if it appears that a part of the evidence is not contained in the bill of exceptions. The presumption would be that the evidence omitted was such as to support the finding.

¡Under the Code, the rule upon this point is the same in law and equity cases.

A judgment will not be reversed on the ground that evidence was improperly admitted, if the record does not disclose any objection or exception to its .admission.

*581October 11.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Racine*County.

The case is stated by the court

*P. B. Ladd,*for appellant.

*Strong & Fuller,*for respondents.

*By the Court,*

Paine, J.

In this case a bill of exceptions was duly settled by the judge, both parties appearing. Af-terwards the appellant’s counsel persuaded him to sign another, which he did however at the appellant’s risk, stating that he was not aware of any practice or law authorizing such a proceeding. A motion was made here to dismiss the appeal, upon affidavits showing that no notice was given of the settlement of the second bill, and upon the ground that the printed case included both bills of exceptions so mingled together that it was difficult if not impossible to separate them. But after the explanations of the counsel, we became satisfied that the first bill could be separated from the other, and denied the motion to dismiss the appeal, holding however, at the same time, that we could only consider the first bill of exceptions. The case was then submitted upon that.

We could not reverse the finding of facts by the court below, even though the evidence brought up did not sustain it; for it appears that a large part of the evidence is not contained in the bill of exceptions. The presumption would be that the evidence omitted was such as to support the finding. The rule is the same now in law and equity cases upon this point, though before the Code it was different.

It is claimed that the court erred in admitting the depositions offered by the plaintiff; but the record does not disclose any objection or exception to their admission.

A large part of the argument of the appellant’s counsel is based upon the supplemental bill of exceptions, which we cannot consider. We can see no error presented by the first.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
#### Zimmerman vs. Turner and another.

*Bill of Exceptions.*

In ejectment, where plaintiff offered in evidence a deed to him from the county and state, which was ruled out because not sealed with the private seal of the cleric, the record of his appeal not showing that it was a tax deed, it does not appear what question is presented, and the judgment must be affirmed.

ERROR to tbe Circuit Court for *Ozaukee*County.

Ejectment. Tbe plaintiff offered in evidence a deed to him from tbe state and county, executed by tbe clerk of tbe board of supervisors of said county, and sealed with bis official seal, which was ruled out because not sealed with bis *private*seal. Judgment of dismissal; and plaintiff sued out bis writ of error.

*Geo. W. Foster,*for plaintiff in error.

*Eugene S. Turner,*for defendants in error.

Cole, J.

It is insisted tbat it does not appear from the record, what was tbe nature of the deed which was offered in evidence on tbe part of tbe plaintiff, and ruled out by *371the court. An examination of the bill of exceptions shows tbat tbis objection is well taken. It is stated in the bill of exceptions, tbat the plaintiff, to maintain the action, offered in evidence a deed of the premises mentioned in the complaint, given to the plaintiff by the county of Ozaukee and state of Wisconsin. the attestation clause of the deed is' given, from wbicb it appears tbat the deed was executed by the clerk of the county board of supervisors of Ozaukee county, “ pursuant to and in virtue of the authority in him vested by the statute,” for and “ in behalf of said state and of the county of Ozaukee.” Now, it might perhaps be inferred from tbis, tbat the deed in question was a tax deed. Yet, is the court at liberty to grope around and guess at the nature and character of tbis deed ? It seems to us not. It is said, *non constat*but the plaintiff offered in evidence a deed of property held by the clerk officially for either or both of the *grantors;*or by himself individually, either as a trust or for the non-payment of taxes, or as property owned by the county and state wbicb be was authorized by some statute to convey. the objection may appear rather hypercritical; and yet it is undoubtedly a most salutary rule to require the bill of exceptions to fairly raise the question upon wbicb the opinion of the court is desired. Had the bill of exceptions stated tbat the plaintiff offered in evidence a tax deed executed by the clerk of the board of supervisors in 1864, in accordance with the form prescribed in section 50, chap. 22, Laws of 1859, then the question whether tbat deed should have the private as well as the official seal of the clerk would have been presented for our consideration. But we can only say inferentially tbat tbis question is involved in the case. We do'not think it too much to require the bill of exceptions to fairly present the question to be decided. We cannot assume, therefore, tbat the deed offered by the plaintiff and ruled out was a tax deed.

*372
      *By the Court.*— Tbe judgment of tbe circuit court is affirmed.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

We consent to thereference to our firm under the caption “Selected Consolidated Financial Data”and to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8Nos. 333-43716, 333-50579, 333-50581, 333-50585, 333-53331,333-62884, 333-65405, 333-104222 and 333-10614)pertaining to the Restricted Stock and Nonstatutory Stock Option Awards toCertain Employees, the Trammell Crow Company Employee Stock Purchase Plan, asamended, the Trammell Crow Company 1997 Stock Option Plan, the Trammell CrowCompany Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended, the Trammell Crow CompanyRetirement Savings Plan, and Restricted Stock to Certain Employees of ourreport dated February 13, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Trammell Crow Company and Subsidiaries included inthe Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2003.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Dallas, TexasMarch 9, 2004

----
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of I-many, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of I-many, Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JOHN A. RADE                                                                  
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer)     
|                                                                                  
|May 11, 2009                                                                      
|                                                                                  
|/s/ KEVIN M. HARRIS                                                               
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal
financial and accounting officer)
|                                                                                  
|May 11, 2009
# C_2016195EN.01000401.xml

| 2.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/4

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,00 % on 1 June 2016

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 June 2016

(2016/C 195/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1174 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 122,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4385 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77358 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2796 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1055 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3083 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,027 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,11 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3978 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5178 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2938 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5370 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4586 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6818 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6373 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5375 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 331,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,5384 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3498 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5118 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 273,74 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6409 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,110 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,7806 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,846 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0211 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6531 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,3780 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1174

JPY

Japanese yen

122,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4385

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77358

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2796

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1055

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3083

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,027

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,11

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3978

RON

Romanian leu

4,5178

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2938

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5370

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4586

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6818

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6373

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5375

KRW

South Korean won

1 331,53

ZAR

South African rand

17,5384

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3498

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5118

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 273,74

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6409

PHP

Philippine peso

52,110

RUB

Russian rouble

74,7806

THB

Thai baht

39,846

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0211

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6531

INR

Indian rupee

75,3780

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
EX-10.45





 Exhibit 10.45 

CMTG DB Finance LLC 
 c/o Mack Real
Estate Credit Strategies 
 60 Columbus Circle, 20th Floor 

New York, New York 10023 

May 7, 2020 
 Deutsche
Bank AG, Cayman Islands Branch 
 60 Wall Street 
 New York, New
York 10005 
 Attention: Tom Rugg 
  

	 	RE:	 Master Repurchase Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2019 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise
modified and in effect from time to time, the “Master Repurchase Agreement”) by and between Deutsche Bank AG, Cayman Islands Branch as Buyer (“Buyer”) and CMTG DB Finance LLC as Master Seller (“Master
Seller”) and Letter Agreement, dated as of June 26, 2019 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Letter Agreement”) by and between Buyer and Master Seller



 Ladies and Gentlemen: 

Reference is hereby made to the Master Repurchase Agreement and the Letter Agreement. Capitalized terms used herein that are not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Master Repurchase Agreement, or if not defined therein, then such terms shall have the meanings set forth in the Letter Agreement. 

Pursuant to Section 3(a)(i) of the Letter Agreement, Master Seller hereby gives Buyer notice of its exercise of an Extension Option to
extend the current Facility Termination Date of the Original Repurchase Date to the First Extended Repurchase Date. 
  

					
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 CMTG DB Finance LLC

		
	 By:  
	 	 /s/ J. Michael McGillis

		 	 Name: J. Michael McGillis

		 	 Title: Authorized
Signatory



  

			
	 CC:
	  	 Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

		  	 One World Financial Center

		  	 200 Liberty Street

		  	 New York, New York 10281

		  	 Attention: Y. Jeffrey Rotblat, Esq.
1

Stout, Alan

From: Stout, Alan

Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 8:19 AM

To: 'Gordon, Jason@ARB'

Subject: RE: Tier 3 dual fuel?

Jason, 

Your approach is correct. It’s probably best to clear that up by combining the last two sentences with a semi-colon to 

make clear that the no-additional-testing provision applies for gasoline-ethanol FFVs (since we want a single test at the 

worst-case blend). We may want to add some words to deal with test requirements for CNG and/or LPG combinations, 

but I’m not sure we need to cover every possible permutation. 

Alan 

From: Gordon, Jason@ARB [mailto:jgordon@arb.ca.gov] 

Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 9:14 PM 

To: Stout, Alan 

Subject: Tier 3 dual fuel? 

Hi Allen, 

I have a simple question to ask you (I hope). For Tier 3, would a dual fuel vehicle need to meet evaporative emission 

standard for the non-gasoline fuel type, even though use the gasoline test value would be used for the fleet average? I 

am pretty sure the answer is yes (from the first sentence below), but I was thrown off just a bit by the last sentence of 

the CFR excerpt below. 

§ 86.1810-17 General standards; increase in emissions; unsafe condition; waivers.

(h) Multi-fueled vehicles (including dual-fueled and flexible-fueled vehicles) shall 

comply with all requirements established for each consumed fuel (or blend of fuels in the 

case of flexible fueled vehicles). In the case of flexible-fueled vehicles operating on 

ethanol and gasoline, this involves additional exhaust emission measurements using the 

fuel specified in 40 CFR 1065.725. No additional evaporative emission testing is 

required. 

Thank you for your help with answering my questions. 

Jason