alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014287EN.01000101.xml

| 28.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7317 — Mercuria/JP Morgan Chase & CO Commodities Trading Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 287/01

On 22 August 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7317. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7317. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1. Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)  I, Ed Bailey, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer, of LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. (the "Registrant") do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge, based upon a review of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period September 30, 2009 of the Registrant, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Dated:  November 13, 2009 By:  /s/ Ed Bailey Ed Bailey Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer  * A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and will be retained by LightTouch Vein & Laser, Inc. and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Firearms Training Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Ronavan R. Mohling, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: June 29, 2004



/S/    RONAVAN R.
MOHLINGRonavan R. Mohling Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2016028EN.01000201.xml

| 26.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 28/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 28/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 January 2016

(2016/C 28/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0815 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4624 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,75890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2758 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0981 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4585 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,70 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4690 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5256 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2660 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5496 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5351 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4304 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6728 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5469 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 293,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,8580 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1156 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6695 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 985,15 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6208 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,890 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 86,0410 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,869 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4276 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,9970 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,2973 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0815

JPY

Japanese yen

128,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4624

GBP

Pound sterling

0,75890

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2758

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0981

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4585

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,70

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4690

RON

Romanian leu

4,5256

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2660

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5496

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5351

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4304

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6728

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5469

KRW

South Korean won

1 293,53

ZAR

South African rand

17,8580

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1156

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6695

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 985,15

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6208

PHP

Philippine peso

51,890

RUB

Russian rouble

86,0410

THB

Thai baht

38,869

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4276

MXN

Mexican peso

19,9970

INR

Indian rupee

73,2973

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
FAX 719-542-5243 11a'` f~ L ~ ` • o

~~'~i'~~ ~ C'+( ~r~ '

. ~

~J_~ ._J 719-542-8278 13th & Erie Streets P.O. Box 533 Pueblo, Colorado 81002-0533



### April 19, 2013

Alex Cristafaro, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency David Rostker, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy 

## Cortney Higgins, U.S. Office of Management and Budget Dear Mr. Cristafaro, Mr. Rostker, and Ms. Higgins: I am writing today as the President of a small brick manufacturing company that has the potential to be significantly impacted by the upcoming MACT standard for major sources in the brick and structural clay 

## processing industry. We are not a forma) Small Entity Representative (SER) in the current review panel being conducted under the Small Business Regulator Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA). We are also 

## not niembers of the Brick Industry Association (BIA). However, all of our industry is working together with the BIA on this critical rulemaking and they are keeping us apprised of the activities on this rule. We consider them to be speaking on all industry's behalf as they work with you. 

## We have really struggled the last six years due to the poor economy and have only operated 50% of the time during 2011 and 2012. We believe that the proposed MACT standard would put us out of business. Everi duririg a booming economy it would be difficult to obtain financing and would increase the cost of our brick 18 to 25°lo due to our sr7iall size. This would make it very difficult to compete with other materials and larger plants. Sincerely,

seph C. Welte President JCW/kac
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 1, 2016

No. 04-16-00260-CV

Mario MAURICIO,

Appellant

v.

Sorayda CERVANTES,

Appellee

From the 131st Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-07395

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant's unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief is hereby 

GRANTED. Time is extended to December 9, 2016.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 1st day of December, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

November 3, 2006

Mr. Reagan W. Simpson

King & Spalding LLP

1100 Louisiana Street, Suite 4000

Houston, TX 77002-5213

Ms. Christa Brown

P.O. Box 162714

Austin, TX 78716-2714

Mr. Russell H. McMains

Law Offices of Russell H. McMains

P.O. Box 2846

Corpus Christi, TX 78403

Mr. David Roberts

Garner, Roberts & Roberts, L.L.P.

P.O. Box 9

Port Lavaca, TX 77979

RE:Case Number:  02-0381

Court of Appeals Number:  13-00-00466-CV

Trial Court Number:  97-CV-255

Style:F.F.P. OPERATING PARTNERS, L.P. D/B/A MR. CUT RATE #602

v.

XAVIER DUEÑEZ, AND WIFE, IRENE DUEÑEZ, AS NEXT FRIENDS OF CARLOS DUEÑEZ AND PABLO DUEÑEZ, MINORS

Dear Counsel:

Today the Supreme Court of Texas withdrew its opinions and judgment of September 3, 2004, and delivered the enclosed substituted opinions and judgment in the above-referenced cause.  

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Gena Pelham, Deputy Clerk

Enclosures

**Case No. 02-0381Page 2**
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40406

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

LUIS ZAVALA-GARCIA, also known as Viejo,

Defendant - Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:13-CR-55-12

Before BARKSDALE, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luis Zavala-Garcia, federal prisoner # 48346-379, pleaded guilty to one 

count of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 100 

kilograms or more, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of marijuana. Zavala

appeals the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence reduction 

based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. 

 

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. 

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 1, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40406 Document: 00513779449 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/01/2016
No. 16-40406

2

Section 3582(c)(2) permits a sentencing modification when, after a 

prisoner is sentenced, the predicate Guidelines sentencing range is lowered 

and made retroactive. See Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 824–26 (2010). 

In that regard, Amendment 782 effectively lowered most drug-related base 

offense levels by two. See U.S.S.G., App. C., Amend. 782. As explained below, 

Amendment 782 was properly applied to Zavala’s sentence; therefore, 

§ 3582(c)(2) is inapplicable.

Amendment 782 became effective after Zavala’s presentence 

investigation report (PSR) was first prepared, but before his sentencing 

hearing. The original PSR noted Zavala’s total offense level was 37, resulting 

in a 210–262-month Guidelines sentencing range. The PSR was revised three 

days prior to the hearing and incorporated Amendment 782’s lower Guidelines 

range, 168–210 months, resulting in a total offense level of 35. Ultimately, 

pursuant to a plea agreement expressly incorporating the reduced sentencing 

range pursuant to Amendment 782, Zavala was sentenced to 108 months’ 

imprisonment, well below the amended sentencing range. 

The plea agreement contained an appellate-waiver provision; Zavala did 

not appeal from that judgment. One year later, Zavala filed the § 3582(c)(2) 

motion, contending the court failed to afford him the benefit of Amendment 

782. 

Contrary to Zavala’s claim, in receiving a sentence 60 months below the 

bottom of the amended sentencing range, Zavala was afforded the full benefit 

of Amendment 782. In short, he is ineligible for a sentence reduction under 

§ 3582(c)(2) because he was not “sentenced to a term of imprisonment based on 

a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing 

Commission”. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2); see Dillon 560 U.S. at 824–26. 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-40406 Document: 00513779449 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/01/2016
DuPon t Chemical s an d Fluoroproduct

s Chamber s Work s Deepwater , N J 0802 3

Februar y 28,201 3 7Z> Director , Chemica

l Contro l Divisio n U S Environmenta

l Protectio n Agency Offic e o f Pollutio n Prevention an

d Toxic s EP A Eas t ^ Roo m414 6 120 1 Constitutio n Avenue , N W Washington , D C 2000

4 Re : EP A - H Q - OPP T - 200 3 - 001 2 DuPon tChambers Work s NJPDE S Permi tNo . NJ000510 0 PFO A Data-Submitta

l - Outfal l DSN66

2 Weekl y Gra b Sample

s Januar y 201 3 Sample Data Dea r Chemica l Contro l Division : Attache d pleas e fin d asummar y o f PFOA analytica

l result s fo r

th e DuPon t Chamber

s Work s weekl y gra

b samples take

n a t interna l outfal l DSN662A i n Januar y 2013

. I n accordanc

e wit h th e curren t sit e NJPDE S permi t (NJ0005100 , effectiv e Septembe r 2011) , these results ar

e provide d to NJDE P o n amonthl y basi s vi aelectroni c discharg e monitorin g reports
. Th e enclosure s includ e tw o pape

r an d tw o electroni c copie s o f the analytica

l result s fro mthi s monitorin g period

.

Jacque s Monteux Uni t Manager-Sit

e Manufacturin g System s DuPon t Chamber s Work s

JM7cl c Enclosure s 

## CONTAIN S N O C E
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania :

State Ethics Commission, :

Petitioner :

:

v. :

:

Elvera Honore, : No. 4 M.D. 2015 

Respondent :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 29

th day of November, 2016, it is ORDERED 

that the above-captioned opinion filed November 3, 2016, shall be designated 

OPINION rather than MEMORANDUM OPINION, and it shall be reported.

___________________________

ANNE E. COVEY, Judge
# C_2016103EN.01000301.xml

| 18.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/3

---

Special Report No 9/2016

‘EU external migration spending in Southern Mediterranean and Eastern Neighbourhood countries until 2014’

(2016/C 103/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 9/2016 ‘EU external migration spending in Southern Mediterranean and Eastern Neighbourhood countries until 2014’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu or on EU Bookshop: https://bookshop.europa.eu

---
### Summary of Analy tical Results 662 - November 2011 **Sample ID** 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB **Date** 11/7/11 11/14/11 11/21/11 11/28/11 **Top (ft)** 0 0 0 0 **Total (T)/ Bottom (ft)**  0 0 0 0 **An aly**  **te units**  **Diss. (D) Duplicate #**  1 1 1 1 PFOA ug/L T 5.00 7.36 3.27 3.56

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid ug/L = micrograms per Liter
represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 11/21/11. collected on 11/21/11 represents the average of lab duplicate results. Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample

< and ND = Non detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 0900006480fc8948.xls:Sheet1 2/29/2012 11:27 AM
- 51 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

302 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. MUELLER

Cite as 302 Neb. 51

State of Nebraska, appellee, v. 

Zachary A. Mueller, appellant.

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed January 18, 2019. No. S-17-387.

supplemental opinion

Appeal from the District Court for Morrill County: Leo P. 

Dobrovolny, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion 

modified. Motion for rehearing overruled.

Sarah P. Newell, of Nebraska Commission on Public 

Advocacy, for appellant.

Douglas J. Peterson, Attorney General, and Stacy M. Foust 

for appellee.

Heavican, C.J., Miller‐Lerman, Cassel, Stacy, Funke, and

Papik, JJ.

Per Curiam.

This case is before us on a motion for rehearing filed by the 

appellant, Zachary A. Mueller, concerning our opinion in State 

v. Mueller.

1

 We overrule the motion, but we modify the opinion 

as follows:

In the statement of facts section, we withdraw the word “no” 

in the second sentence in the 16th paragraph and substitute the 

word “another” in the quotation.2

1 State v. Mueller, 301 Neb. 778, 920 N.W.2d 424 (2018).

2 Id. at 786, 920 N.W.2d at 432.

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

04/12/2019 12:07 AM CDT
- 52 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets

302 Nebraska Reports

STATE v. MUELLER

Cite as 302 Neb. 51

In the analysis section, we withdraw the fifth paragraph3

under the subheading “Venue Instruction” and substitute the 

following:

We note that although Mueller argued that the court 

should have given a venue instruction based on § 29-1306, 

he did not actually tender such an instruction, and that 

therefore, to the extent Mueller asserts on appeal that the 

court erred when it refused a requested instruction, under 

the applicable standards set forth above, we do not ordinarily review whether the “tendered instruction” was a 

correct statement of the law or whether it was warranted 

by the evidence. See State v. Swindle, 300 Neb. 734, 

915 N.W.2d 795 (2018). Here, we can review whether 

the venue instruction the court actually gave was proper 

under the circumstances; a consideration of whether the 

instruction should have included the content of § 29-1306 

is an incidental part of that analysis.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modified.

 Motion for rehearing overruled.

Freudenberg, J., not participating.

3 Id. at 791, 920 N.W.2d at 435.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Annual Report of Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc., (the “Company”) on form 10-K for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard V. Secord, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

|  | 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 

 

 

 

 

Date: September 29, 2003

 

 

/s/ Richard V. Secord

 

 

 

Richard V. SecordChairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer

 

 
    |
|--|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# C_2014299EN.01000301.xml

| 5.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

4 September 2014

2014/C 299/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3015 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,89 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4470 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79320 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1570 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2055 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1175 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,662 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,44 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1854 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4015 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8047 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3927 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4160 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0870 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5665 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6306 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 325,56 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8787 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9896 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6200 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 320,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1325 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,716 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,2042 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,699 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9176 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0223 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,4199 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3015

JPY

Japanese yen

136,89

DKK

Danish krone

7,4470

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79320

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1570

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2055

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1175

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,662

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,44

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1854

RON

Romanian leu

4,4015

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8047

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3927

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4160

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0870

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5665

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6306

KRW

South Korean won

1 325,56

ZAR

South African rand

13,8787

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9896

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6200

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 320,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1325

PHP

Philippine peso

56,716

RUB

Russian rouble

48,2042

THB

Thai baht

41,699

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9176

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0223

INR

Indian rupee

78,4199

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---