alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 2 5 , 2020

t0324 

# Order

Clerk March 25 , 2020

159791

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 159791

COA: 348186

Allegan CC: 17

- 021004

- FC

MICHAEL EDWARD REESE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

By order of December 30, 2019, the prosecuting attorney was directed to answer

the application for leave to appeal the May 1, 2019 order of the Court of Appeals. On

order of the Court, the answer having been received, the application for leave to appeal is

again considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of gran ting leave to appeal,

we REMAND this case to the Allegan Circuit Court for correction of the judgment of

sentence. The prosecuting attorney has conceded that the defendant’s 200

- month

minimum sentence violates the two

- thirds rule of People v Tanner , 387 M ich 683, 690

(1972), and MCL 769.34(2)(b). Under that rule, because the statutory maximum for

third

- degree criminal sexual conduct, see MCL 750.520d(2), as elevated by the habitual

offender statute, MCL 769.10(1)(a), is 270 months, the longest minimum sen tence that

the defendant could receive is 180 months, or 15 years. The judgment of sentence is to

be amended accordingly. We further ORDER the trial court to ensure that the corrected

judgment of sentence is transmitted to the Department of Corrections. In all other

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question

presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
#### Stewart vs. Nettleton.

It is not essential to the validity of a judgment in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage where the whole amount is not due, that the record should show that there was an order of reference to take proof whether the premises could be sold in parcels. It is competent for the *court*to take such proof without a reference; and where the judgment recited that it appeared to the court that the premises could not be sold in parcels, that was sufficient.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Green Lake*County.

*John 0.*Truesdell, for appellants.

*Shan &*MeFetridge, for respondent

*466April 10.

*By the Court,*

*Paine, J.*

The only question wbicb appears to be made in tbis case is, whether it is essential to the yaüdity of a judgment in an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage, where the amount was not all due, that the judgment roll should show that there was an order of reference to take proofs whether the premises could be sold in parcels. No such order appears in this case; but the judgment recites that “it appeared that the premises were so situated that they could not be sold in parcels,” &c. "We think this is all that is necessary. It shows that the court informed itself of the fact; and whether this was done by means of a reference, or by taking the proof itself, is immaterial. It is true that sec. 6, chap. 145, says that in such cases the court shall direct a reference, &c. But we do not regard this as imperative. Such a reference is merely in aid of the court, to assist in the dispatch of business, and was never designed to deprive the court of the power to transact the same business if it saw fit. Accordingly in sec. 2, chap. 132, R. S., 1858, it is provided generally, that whenever the proof of any fact is necessary to enable the court to give judgment, the court “ may hear the proof, or, in its discretion, order a reference,” &c. We have no doubt of its power to take the proof as to the situation of the mortgaged premises; and the absence of an order of reference for that purpose shows no error in the record.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

# CERTIFICATION

# PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Tanir Horn, as Chief Financial Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)       
          the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008
          as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the
          Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated: June 29, 2009 |  | By: /s/ Tanir Horn
Tanir HornChief Financial Officer of the Company
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
1517 WEST FRONT STREET SUITE 354 TYLER, TX 75702 TEL: 903-593-8471 FAX: 903-593-2193

Serving Anderson, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Trinity, Upshur, Van 

Zandt and Wood Counties

www.12thcoa.courts.state.tx.us

CHIEF JUSTICE

JAMES T. WORTHEN

JUSTICES

BRIAN HOYLE

GREG NEELEY

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

CLERK

CATHY S. LUSK

CHIEF STAFF ATTORNEY

MARGARET HUSSEY

June 2, 2015

Ms. Lois Rogers

District Clerk, Smith County

Courthouse, Suite 204

100 North Broadway Avenue

Tyler, TX 75702-7201

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

RE: Case Number: 12-14-00072-CR

Trial Court Case Number: 114-0302-13

Style: Sir Ortiz

v.

The State of Texas

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

information below and to return the attached copy to this office.

Very truly yours,

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

By:_____________________________

Katrina McClenny, Chief Deputy Clerk

C

C

:

Mr. Austin R. Jackson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mr. Michael J. West (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Sir Ortiz

Mandate executed on _3RD __ day of ___JUNE_____________, 2015.

Brief explanation of action taken: ___SCANNED________________________________________

____________LINDA RHYMES_________________________________District/County Clerk

FILE COPY

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 6/3/2015 8:30:08 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 27, 2017

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00461- CR

MARQUIS ANDREW BRANCH, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 248th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1530996

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N Appellant Marquis Andrew Branch entered a plea of guilty to aggravated robbery. Appellant and the State agreed that appellant’s punishment would not
exceed imprisonment for more than 40 years. In accordance with the terms of this agreement with the State, on February 13, 2017 , the trial court sentenced appellant
to confinement for 30 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a notice of appeal on June 8, 2017

. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal for two reasons: the notice of appeal was2

not filed timely, and this is a plea bargain case with no appealable matters and appellant has not been granted permission to appeal.
First, a defendant’s notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after sentence is imposed when the defendant has not filed a motion for new trial. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements
of Rule 26 .2 is essential to vest the court of appeals with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State , 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, a court of appeals does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal. Under those circumstances it can take no action other than to dismiss the appeal. Id. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed 115 days after sentence was imposed. Therefore, the appeal was not timely perfected, and we lack jurisdiction.
Second, an agreement that places a cap on punishment is a plea bargain for purposes of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(a)(2). Shankle v. State , 119 S.W.3d 808, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (sen tence bargaining may be for recommendations to the court on sentences, including a recommended “cap” on sentencing). In a plea bargain case

— that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the puni shment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant

— a defendant may appeal only matters raised by a written , pretrial motion or with the trial court’s permission. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).
Appellant’s punishment of 30 years’ imprisonment does not exceed the agreed cap of 40 years. The record does not contain any appealable pretrial rulings , and the trial court did not grant appellant permission to appeal. 1

1 The certification of appellant’s right to appeal incorrectly indicates this case is not a plea bargain case and appellant has the right to appeal, but the record establishes the opposite. In such a situation, we know of no authority that would require us to obtain an corrected certification3

Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Donovan, and Jewell

. Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

before dismissing the appeal. Barcenas v. State , 137 S.W.3d 865, 866 (Tex. App.— Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, no pet. ).
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.2


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-82016 of Computerized Thermal Imaging and subsidiaries (the "Company") on
Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-92378 on Form S-8 of our report
dated September 1, 2000, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the
Company for the year ended June 30, 2000, and from inception on June 10, 1987
through June 30, 2000.



HJ & Associates, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
September 30, 2002
# C_2015298EN.01000101.xml

| 10.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 September 2015

(2015/C 298/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1139 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4611 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72510 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4024 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0893 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,057 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,17 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2067 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4174 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3633 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5860 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4757 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6334 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7461 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5782 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 325,47 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2276 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1047 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5510 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 869,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8043 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,258 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,7811 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,193 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2340 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,6895 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,9755 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1139

JPY

Japanese yen

134,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4611

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72510

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4024

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0893

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,057

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,17

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2067

RON

Romanian leu

4,4174

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3633

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5860

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4757

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6334

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7461

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5782

KRW

South Korean won

1 325,47

ZAR

South African rand

15,2276

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1047

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5510

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 869,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8043

PHP

Philippine peso

52,258

RUB

Russian rouble

75,7811

THB

Thai baht

40,193

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2340

MXN

Mexican peso

18,6895

INR

Indian rupee

73,9755

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF KEVCO, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,098
<SECURITIES>                                         0<F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   38,861<F2>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       711
<INVENTORY>                                     67,070
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               129,804
<PP&E>                                          56,993
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,237
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           68,052
<BONDS>                                        203,546
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            96
<OTHER-SE>                                      22,617
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   292,372
<SALES>                                        840,281
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               846,338
<CGS>                                          746,469
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  746,469
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (35,037)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,042
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (36,079)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,079)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (4.49)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.49)
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNTS INAPPLICABLE OR NOT DISCLOSED AS A SEPARATE LINE ON THE STATEMENT
OF FINANCIAL POSITION OR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS ARE REPORTED AS 0 HEREIN.
<F2>NOTES AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE-TRADE ARE REPORTED NET OF ALLOWANCES FOR
DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS IN THE STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION.
</FN>


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the
      period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





August
      15, 2008


By:
              /s/
                  Pengcheng ChenPengcheng
                  Chen, CEO
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State,

v.

JESUS ALBERTO GERARDO,

 Appellee.

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-13-00142-CR

Appeal from the

384th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20120D03572)

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is the State’s motion to stay proceedings in The State of Texas v. 

Jesus Alberto Gerardo, cause number 20120D03572, which is pending in the 384th District Court. 

The State’s motion is GRANTED. The trial court is directed to stay all proceedings in this case 

pending further order of this Court or resolution of the appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of June, 2013.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera and Rodriguez, JJ.
# C_2016184EN.01000201.xml

| 21.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 May 2016

(2016/C 184/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1219 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 123,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4370 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77008 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3588 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1123 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,3355 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,025 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 316,78 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4203 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5058 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3476 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5519 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4704 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7141 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6578 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5499 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 332,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,6669 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3456 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,4865 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 285,95 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5785 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,477 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,9139 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,085 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,9797 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,6541 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,6975 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1219

JPY

Japanese yen

123,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4370

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77008

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3588

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1123

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,3355

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,025

HUF

Hungarian forint

316,78

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4203

RON

Romanian leu

4,5058

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3476

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5519

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4704

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7141

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6578

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5499

KRW

South Korean won

1 332,02

ZAR

South African rand

17,6669

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3456

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,4865

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 285,95

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5785

PHP

Philippine peso

52,477

RUB

Russian rouble

74,9139

THB

Thai baht

40,085

BRL

Brazilian real

3,9797

MXN

Mexican peso

20,6541

INR

Indian rupee

75,6975

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case names: Miguel Zaragoza Fuentes, et al. v. Evangelina Lopez Guzman Zaragoza 

(Appellate Cause Number 01-16-00951-CV)

In re Miguel Zaragoza Fuentes

(Appellate Cause Number 01-16-00951-CV)

In re Elsa Esther Carrillo Anchondo and Eagle Ridge Properties, LLC 

(Appellate Cause Number 01-16-00952-CV)

Trial court case number: 2014-30215

Trial court: 245th District Court of Harris County

Appellants in above cause number 01-16-00251-CV and relators in above cause numbers 

01-16-00951-CV and 01-16-00952-CV have filed an Opposed Emergency Joint Motion for Stay 

requesting an emergency stay of (1) Temporary Orders Pending Appeal signed by the trial court 

on November 23, 2016 and (2) execution or enforcement of the Final Decree of Divorce signed by 

the trial court on December 21, 2015. 

The motion to stay is granted in part. The Temporary Orders Pending Appeal signed on 

November 23, 2016 are ordered stayed pending further order from this Court. The Court requests 

a response from appellee and real parties in interest regarding the request to stay execution or 

enforcement of the Final Decree of Divorce within 10 days from the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually 

Date: December 2, 2016
Exhibit 10.13


 


ACKNOWLEDGMENT
AND UNDERTAKING


 


I,
the undersigned Samira Azab, born in 12/11/1992 with Passport Number - A20332178, in my capacity
as shareholder in Anghami for Digital Content registered with the Registry of Commerce in Egypt, sub N° 104024,


 


Hereby
acknowledge registered in my name in the Share Register or any other deed or document of Anghami for Digital Content, are in fact entirely
and exclusively owned by Anghami, a company with registration number 266308-Cayman Islands, which has paid their price and therefore
that the rights inherent to the said shares entirely belong to Anghami.


 


Accordingly,


 


I
declare that I exercise all the rights attached to the above shares, as a nominee for the account of Anghami, and hereby undertake:


 


		1-	To
                                            remit the said shares to Anghami, and to transfer their ownership, upon its first demand
                                            and free of charge, to its name or to the name of any person and/or entity designated by
                                            Anghami.



 


		2-	Not
                                            to transfer any of the said shares without Anghami's written consent and to assign in the
                                            event, the said shares in compliance with Anghami's written request.



 


		3-	Not
                                            to give any of the said shares any collateral and to lift, under my guarantee, any seizure
                                            eventually ordered against the said shares.



 


		4-	To
                                            remit without consideration to Anghami all the profits and all the amounts whatsoever that
                                            I shall receive from Anghami for Digital Content in relation to the said shares.



 


	Date:	16th
    April 2018	 
	Name:	Samira Azab	 
	Signature: 	/s/ Samira
    Azab