alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,069

EX PARTE DONALD FLINT, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 06F0023-202 IN THE 202 DISTRICT COURT ND

FROM BOWIE COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of one count of

aggravated sexual assault and three counts of indecency with a child. He was sentenced to

imprisonment for one term of fifty years and three terms of ten years. The Sixth Court of Appeals

dismissed his appeal. Flint v. State, No. 06-08-00104-CR (Tex. App.–Texarkana, July 10, 2008, no

pet.). 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to an appeal. The trial court entered findings
2

of fact and conclusions of law and determined that Applicant was denied his right to an appeal. We

find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the

judgment of conviction in Cause No. 06F0023-202 from the 202 Judicial District Court of Bowie nd

County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a written notice of appeal

so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal. All time limits shall be

calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues.

We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file

a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Delivered: January 14, 2009

Do Not Publish
Order entered October 20, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 14 - 01003 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF R .E.C. AND C.A.C. , MINOR CHILDREN On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 401 - 51560 - 00



### O RDER We GRANT appellant’s October 16, 2014 motion to extend time to file brief and ORDER the brief tendered to the Clerk of the Court October 7, 2014 filed as of the date of this order

. Appellee shall file his brief no later than Novem ber 19, 2014.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
. , , · ... h "' • ~ 10 

CCi'srC 11 

4.1 12 

=! ·'::..: ,l 

r~··_';; 1 

i.·1~' 4-6 SI.G 13 

hG 1 AGO # 2766¢ 

f!ijlmJ' {.G .. FR1I:JJ4AN) 8 

J)Jt ;~~f.) ~ ' PARAPHRASE BO? Elf.:!~ 

21 OCT 54 SS99iD y 

r>TG: 211 79J9z OCT 54 

.l?L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3;3 (h) (2) 

r •: •·", • ;· • -iL------1 

.~iiD f."?Ct\BORsHlP <.- C~ z. R- YOU FalWARD REPCm' IR !'!!JS ~10.H 1£ WEIJ.. 

) .. :) .u.t IVAtTMT.E ClfAM'S, PBC7l'OGRA'Pte, gro. cmcrua UR D'l'ERPHETNrI<Jt w PAPA crr~o 

;')R, t. CB, lllBAl!Ull· tn ~ 1561 ~t Irr. Mc-, llBABllB, """ to attend a ~·.;son.atx•atj.on of' al at the request of .ASAI and the Signal Ofi':i.1'!1.!J' 

~.0511.mic'ationg Zone (CCII - under ) , a.1.eo aakecl the Directer for infOrii!t\tiiu 

: ~ut auC'h a.tt!lndsnce repre•ented a prCJP.er function ot !ISAEUR. 

2. PROD (Mr. Rnven, Mr. Siu), desires that Mr. R1cha:r4 attend thia deJP.OnBtrf\.·t·.r. .• · ·.,n.1, 1'1.ll'the::r, wishes to recet11e all A.vr.1.ilable 1nf'Ol'llat1on on the ctenon11tra.tic:Jn. C0:~4!\. 

(Col. D&;via, Mr. Croakery) conaidv that a ch pa:rt1cipat1on 1• in cx.-"der; the beJi:il.fti' 

i.lt::in.g tt.s.t 148..~ should provide all technical aaaiatance poaaible to .A.SAE. 

3. BSA Directive :No. 3 is tbs! Directive which pl'ClllUlgates the mmsion, f\mct.~1:>.1!1: 

-:·.ud reaions~bilitea ot lfSAEUR. Pwt1nent extract frca Pa.rt II para l (1) u foJ.lar11J ~ 

'" .. "Lami-st 111 and.Jar conduct examinatim of non-tS cryptologic •terial. Espe41tiniw!.:,r .:"orw~:rd or1g1ml. material or CCllplete deacr1pt1ana thereOt to the D"lrector."' N/n -~1"ep<J.:rel. 21 Octo~ 1954. 

I A·I~ 

\. Mr. 'l!. I •• Burna/P/P/6o54S/3s 

1 l 

~~. T. r .... Buma ~o P/f ~ CHDJ' • PLAE MD POLICY 

SE€BE'f COPY_~OF" 13 COPIES 

eclassifi ed and a ro d for rel ea e b SA on 01-08-2014 ursuantto E .0. 13 2
TS-CKHI02

Attachment #2

Summary of Information on the New Chemical Substance
# C_2016298EN.01000102.xml

| 18.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 298/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 298/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8108 — CVC/Sisal Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 298/02)

On 11 August 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8108. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8108. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 24.9

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Robert E. Sulentic, Derek R. McClain and J. Christopher Kirk and each of
them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, to sign on his behalf, as a director
or officer, or both, as the case may be, of Trammell Crow Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation"), the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001, and to sign any or all amendments to such Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact, and each of them with or without the others, full power and authority to do and perform each and every
act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of
said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

| |  | /s/ARLIN E. GAFFNERArlin E. Gaffner
| |  | -----------------------------------

---

QuickLinks
----

----

| 1.  | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F/A of On Track Innovations Ltd.; and |
|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Oded Bashan                        |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|
|   |   | Oded Bashan                            |
|   |   | Chief Executive Officer of the Company |

----

----
# C_2014410EN.01001001.xml

| 18.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/10

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2014/C 410/05

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Slovenia

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Slovenia

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Slovenia

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Emona-Ljubljana

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The central image of the coin is the composition of letters that form the word ‘EMONA’ or ‘AEMONA’ and a stylised design of Emona. At the bottom, in circular sense, the inscription ‘EMONA LJUBLJANA SLOVENIJA 2015’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 1 million

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : January 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>               5
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>			DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>				SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                  3,881,656
<SECURITIES>				000
<RECEIVABLES>                           531,491
<ALLOWANCES>				000
<INVENTORY>                             000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>			000
<PP&E>					8,306,724
<DEPRECIATION>				4,596,380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>				8,123,491
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   000
<BONDS>					000
<COMMON>				000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   000
<PREFERRED>				000
<OTHER-SE>				(9,390,482)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>		8,123,491
<SALES>					000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        2,167,574
<CGS>					000
<TOTAL-COSTS>				1,066,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>			410,748
<LOSS-PROVISION>			000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>			498,367
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         192,270
<INCOME-TAX>				000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     192,270
<DISCONTINUED>				000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         000
<CHANGES>				000
<NET-INCOME>				192,270
<EPS-PRIMARY>				52.67
<EPS-DILUTED>				000
        		

</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000522

30-NOV-2016

09:32 AM
Collection Activity Number of RespondentsNumber of

Responses per Party Total

Number of Responses Time per

Response Cost per

Response (Dollars) Total Hours Total Cost (Dollars) 80.1450 - Registration

(a) at $103/hour 500 1 500 8 824 4000 412000 CDX Registration 500 1 500 2 206 1000 103000
**TOTA LS**  **1000 1000**  **5000 515000**  **Information Collection Burden by Type of Party** Table III - "Obligated Parties" (Including Refiners and Exporters or Renewable Fuels) [Assumes 150 refiners and 100 exporters.]
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to April 20, 2021)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-20-614 State on behalf of Lorelia S. v. Rachel. S.

A-20-688,

A-20-690 Mitchell v. Mitchell

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
Hillsborough

No. 82-539

#### The State of New Hampshire v. Michael Merrill

September 27, 1984

*Gregory H. Smith,*attorney general *(Amy L. Ignatius,*attorney, on the brief), by brief for the State.

*Joanne S. Green,*assistant appellate defender, of Concord, by brief for the defendant.

Souter, J.

A jury found the defendant guilty of burglary, following a trial at which he did not testify. The defendant moved for declaration of mistrial on the ground that the prosecutor in his final argument improperly commented on the defendant’s silence. The Superior Court *(Goode,*J.) denied the motion, subject to exception. We affirm.

The defendant objected to this portion of the prosecutor’s argument:

> “Only that Lthe defendant] went in there and the fact that he tried to fool the police that day is more evidence of his guilt. He’s attempting to pull the wool over the police’s eyes and yours. Don’t let him say that he’s not guilty when, in fact, we know that he is guilty.”

The defendant claims that the remarks violated his rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the National Constitution, which forbid “comment by the prosecution on the accused’s silence.” *Griffin v. California,*380 U.S. 609, 615 (1965); *cf.*N.H. Const, pt. I, art. 15; RSA 516:32.

The offending comment in *Griffin*referred expressly to the defendant’s decision to keep silent: “‘Essie Mae is dead, she can’t tell you her side of the story. The defendant won’t.’” 380 U.S. at 611. The prosecutor’s language in the case before us made no such express *480reference to the defendant’s silence. Rather, it accused him of trying to pull the wool over the jurors’ eyes and of saying he was not guilty when he was guilty. Whatever may be the merits of these comments, they are not obviously comments on silence, and it is difficult to see that they would fall within the *Griffin*proscription.

Assuming *arguendo*that there is any doubt on the issue, we turn to the standard as articulated in *Lussier v. Gunter,*552 F.2d 385 (1st Cir.), *cert. denied,*434 U.S. 854 (1977), for determining the applicability'of the *Griffin*rule in questionable cases. The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit adopted this test: ‘“whether the language used was manifestly intended or was of such a character that the jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to *testify;”’.Id.*at 389 (quoting *Knowles v. United States,*224 F.2d 168, 170 (10th Cir. 1955)). Judged on these criteria, the prosecutor’s statement falls on the permissible side of the line. It manifested no intent to comment on more than the defendant’s behavior before arrest and his plea of not guilty, and it would not have been necessary or natural for the jury to take it otherwise. While the fact of this appeal proves that the remark was ill-conceived, there was no violation of *Griffin.*

Since we find no violation, it is not necessary to consider the doctrine of harmless error under *United States v. Hasting,*103 S. Ct. 1974 (1983), or the standard for choosing between declarations of mistrial and curative instructions when error is not harmless.

*Affirmed.*

All concurred.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Paul Munoz III, * From the 142nd District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. CR39214.

Vs. No. 11-14-00327-CR * November 30, 2016

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
# C_2016259EN.01000102.xml

| 16.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 259/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8077 — Bancopopular-e/Banco Popular Portugal)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 259/02)

On 11 July 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8077. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8077. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF

C.R.A.,

A JUVENILE

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00140-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1

§

Of Denton County, Texas

§

(TC# JV-2014-00155)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. It appearing to this Court that 

Appellant is indigent, we make no further order as to payment of costs on appeal. This decision 

shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
# C_2016115EN.01000401.xml

| 1.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

31 March 2016

(2016/C 115/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1385 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4512 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2253 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0931 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4145 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,051 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,12 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2576 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4718 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2118 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4807 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4738 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8282 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6411 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5304 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 294,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7866 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3514 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5255 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 024,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4078 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,284 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,3051 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,018 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,1174 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5903 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,4298 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1385

JPY

Japanese yen

127,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4512

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79155

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2253

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0931

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4145

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,051

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,12

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2576

RON

Romanian leu

4,4718

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2118

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4807

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4738

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8282

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6411

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5304

KRW

South Korean won

1 294,88

ZAR

South African rand

16,7866

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3514

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5255

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 024,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4078

PHP

Philippine peso

52,284

RUB

Russian rouble

76,3051

THB

Thai baht

40,018

BRL

Brazilian real

4,1174

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5903

INR

Indian rupee

75,4298

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015249EN.01000201.xml

| 30.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 July 2015

(2015/C 249/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1030 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,50 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4614 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70530 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4766 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0622 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9975 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,066 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,29 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1392 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4223 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0434 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5101 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4289 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5494 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6531 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5075 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 277,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8317 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8486 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5980 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 850,85 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2028 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,196 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 65,6940 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,552 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7163 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9695 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,4872 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1030

JPY

Japanese yen

136,50

DKK

Danish krone

7,4614

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70530

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4766

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0622

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9975

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,066

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,29

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1392

RON

Romanian leu

4,4223

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0434

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5101

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4289

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5494

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6531

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5075

KRW

South Korean won

1 277,13

ZAR

South African rand

13,8317

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8486

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5980

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 850,85

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2028

PHP

Philippine peso

50,196

RUB

Russian rouble

65,6940

THB

Thai baht

38,552

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7163

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9695

INR

Indian rupee

70,4872

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
Kevco, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-19959) of our report dated April 12, 1999,
on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Kevco, Inc. as of
December 31, 1998, and December 31, 1997 and for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 1998, which report is incorporated by reference in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Forth Worth, Texas
April 12, 1999