alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 10.13

                               FIRST AMENDMENT TO
                             STOCKHOLDERS AGREEMENT

     First Amendment dated as of December 17, 1996 to the Stockholders Agreement
dated as of August 5, 1996 (the "Stockholders Agreement") among FURNISHINGS
INTERNATIONAL INC. and its stockholders; defined terms used herein and not
otherwise defined are used herein as defined in the Stockholders Agreement.

     Certain managers have expressed a desire to give a limited number of shares
of HFG Common Stock to their own parents or to their spouse's parents, which
gifts would require an amendment to the current definition of "Permitted
Transferee" in the Stockholders Agreement.

     The undersigned wish to effect such an amendment, so long as the total
number of shares of HFG Common Stock so transferred does not exceed 1,000 shares
in the aggregate (i.e., 0.1% of the HFG Common Stock on a Fully-Diluted Basis).

     The undersigned have the authority to effect such an amendment pursuant to
Sections 7.2 and 7.4 of the Stockholders Agreement.

     Accordingly, the undersigned hereby amend clause (i) of the definition of
"Permitted Transferee" in Section 1.1(a) of the Stockholders Agreement by adding
the following proviso to the end of such clause:

            "provided, however, that the Chairman of the Company may permit any
      manager to give a specified number of shares of HFG Common Stock to his or
      her parents, to his or her spouse's parents, or to any thereof, so long as
      the total number of shares of HFG Common Stock transferred by all such
      managers pursuant to this proviso does not exceed 1,000 shares in the
      aggregate (with appropriate adjustments for stock splits, stock dividends,
      and stock combinations)."

     In Witness Whereof, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment
(which may be executed in multiple counterparts) as of the date first written
above.

MASCO CORPORATION                         399 VENTURE PARTNERS, INC.


By:____________________________           By:______________________________
   Its: Senior Vice President and            Its:
        General Counsel


                                         _____________________________________
                                         Douglas C. Barnard, as Voting Trustee
                                         Under an Agreement Dated August 5, 1996


<PAGE>

                                          FURNISHINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC.


                                          By:  __________________________
                                                   Its Vice President

First Amendment to
Stockholders Agreement
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHARLES LEE SEMKO,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-996

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Citrus County,

Richard A. Howard, Judge.

Charles Lee Semko, Milton, pro se.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and 

George D.E. Burden, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal1, we affirm as to all issues raised by Appellant, Charles L. 

Semko. However, we note a scrivener’s error in the sentence. The trial court orally 

pronounced that the statutory maximum sentence would be imposed for Count Two 

 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
2

(grand theft), which is five years in prison; but the written judgment reflects a sentence of 

fifteen years for that count. We, therefore, remand this case to the trial court to correct 

this scrivener’s error. 

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error.

SAWAYA, TORPY and WALLIS, JJ., concur.
# C_2016031EN.01000401.xml

| 28.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 31/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 31/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 January 2016

(2016/C 31/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0888 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4625 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,75965 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2591 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1068 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4508 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,025 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4710 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5388 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2560 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5461 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5331 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4861 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6739 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5542 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 308,94 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,7803 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1621 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6685 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 090,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6203 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,162 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,2106 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,963 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3963 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,0040 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,0928 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0888

JPY

Japanese yen

128,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4625

GBP

Pound sterling

0,75965

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2591

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1068

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4508

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,025

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4710

RON

Romanian leu

4,5388

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2560

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5461

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5331

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4861

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6739

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5542

KRW

South Korean won

1 308,94

ZAR

South African rand

17,7803

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1621

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6685

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 090,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6203

PHP

Philippine peso

52,162

RUB

Russian rouble

85,2106

THB

Thai baht

38,963

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3963

MXN

Mexican peso

20,0040

INR

Indian rupee

74,0928

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6904

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SANDRA ELLIOTT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:09-cr-00383-BO-1)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sandra Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. William Miller Gilmore, 

Jennifer P. May-Parker, Stephen Aubrey West, Assistant United

States Attorneys, Kimberly Ann Moore, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sandra Elliott appeals the district court’s order denying 

her motion seeking a new trial pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 33 

and a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 29. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. United States v. Elliott, No. 5:09-cr-00383-BO-1

(E.D.N.C. June 24, 2016). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2015162EN.01000102.xml

| 19.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 162/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 162/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7609 — Omnes Capital/Predica Prévoyance/Quadran/Quadrica)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 162/02)

On 8 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7609. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7609. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 175 ) ll-K-(F)- 3 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:54 AM Sheet 175of 325P. 2

II-K-(F)- 3
TABLE S CONCERNING FOSSI L FUE L DEMAND AND AIR POLLUTIO N EMISSIONS . Lette r fro

m D . Mykytyn , EE

A t o P . DelDuca , DOE . Augus t 22 , 1980 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(F)- 3
Exhibit 23.2



                 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



Board of Directors and Stockholders
Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. of our report dated
March 27, 1995, relating to the consolidated  financial  statements of Hungarian
Telephone and Cable Corp.  and  subsidiaries,  appearing in its Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996.



BDO Seidman, LLP



New York, New York
March 26, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND> This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from PJ
America's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 26, 1999
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                            DEC-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-26-1999
<CASH>                                          2,648
<SECURITIES>                                    6,929
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                       910
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                7,151
<PP&E>                                         36,681
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,494)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 47,937
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           4,908
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           54
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,484
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,937
<SALES>                                         95,489
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                95,489
<CGS>                                           29,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,048
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,811
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   690
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (617)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,557
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,648
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (181)
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,467
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92



</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7765

WILLIAM HOLLY,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

J. D. LAMER, Warden; KATHLEEN M. HAWK, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons; JANET RENO,

Attorney General; GASTON CAPERTON, Governor;

EVEN BAYH, Governor; PAMELA CARTER, Attorney

General State of Indiana; CHARLES G. BROWN,

Attorney General of West Virginia,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-70-5)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 18, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Holly, Appellant Pro Se. Scott E. Johnson, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia; Helen

Campbell Altmeyer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling,

West Virginia, for Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

William Holly appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and his corresponding

motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Holly v. Lamer, No. CA-95-70-5

(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 30, 1996; Oct. 16, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ACCEPTED

01-15-00194-cv

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

3/23/2015 10:16:11 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/23/2015 10:16:11 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
# C_2016153EN.01000601.xml

| 29.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2016/C 153/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : The Republic of San Marino

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 400th anniversary of the death of William Shakespeare

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design depicts a portrait of the poet. On the right, in a semi-circle, the dates ‘1616-2016’ and the name of the issuing country ‘San Marino’; on the bottom right, the initials of the artist ‘MB’. On the left, in a semi-circle, the inscription ‘William Shakespeare’; on the bottom left, the mintmark ‘R’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : September 2016

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
NUMBER 13-12-00639-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG 

____________________________________________________________

JOHN EDWARD DIMAS, Appellant,

v.

NOE IBARRA PUENTE, Appellee. 

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 370th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, John Edward Dimas, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by 

the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2649-12-G. The 

parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss appeal on grounds that the parties have 

reached an agreement regarding the matters at issue in this appeal. The parties request 
2

that this Court dismiss this case without prejudice to appellant’s right to contest the 

validity of the temporary injunctions in any contempt proceeding.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss 

without prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed 

without prejudice to appellant’s right to contest the validity of the temporary injunctions in 

any contempt proceeding. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are 

taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement 

of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). 

The parties request immediate issuance of our mandate. See TEX. R. APP.

P.18.1(c). The motion is GRANTED. We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue the 

mandate immediately.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

29th day of November, 2012.
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0908; Dir ID 2010-NM-251-AD
# C_2015293EN.01000301.xml

| 5.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 293/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Finland

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 150th anniversary of the birth of artist Akseli Gallen-Kallela

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : On the top of the design there is a swimming swan of Tuonela. The water below the swan is waving from the descending spirit. The indication of the issuing country ‘FI’ is at the right end of the horizon line. At the bottom of the design there is the artist’s palette with Gallen-Kallela’s year of birth ‘1865’ and the year of issuance ‘2015’. Next to the pallet is the mint mark. The artist’s name ‘AKSELI GALLEN KALLELA’ is on the ring of the coin, below the horizon line.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : October 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

MARIA SALINAS

,

Appellant,

v.

MANUEL SALINAS

,

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 17

- 00006

- C V

Appeal from the

388 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2015DCM1368 )

O R D E R

Pending before the Court is Appellant’s fourth motion for an extension to time to secure a

written judgment signed by the trial court. Appellant filed notice of appeal on January 5, 2017,

but the clerk’s record does not contain a written judgment. On Feb ruary 10, 2017, the Court

notified Appellant that the appeal would be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction due to the absence

of a written judgment in the record. The Court subsequently granted Appellant three extensions

of time in which to secure the judgm ent. Appellant has now filed a fourth extension request and

his explanation is that counsel has been unable to contact the court reporter to determine whether

the judgment is correct. This is the same reason he gave in previous extension motion. The

Cou rt has been patient, and we have given Appellant four months to obtain a written judgment

signed by the trial court. In our letter notice granting the most recent extension request, we

warned Appellant that failure to get the judgment filed by the deadlin e could result in dismissal

of the appeal for lack of prosecution. Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 12 th day of June , 20 1 7

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., Rodriguez

, and Palafox

, JJ.