alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Brian R. McDonald, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced AnalogicTechnologies Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, for the third quarter ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Intentionallyomitted pursuant to SEC rules] 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: October 30, 2006
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of 
Kevco, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-19959) of our report dated February 9, 
1998, on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Kevco, Inc. as 
of December 31, 1997, and December 31, 1996 and for each of the three years 
in the period ended December 31, 1997, which report is incorporated by 
reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.
Fort Worth, Texas
March 17, 1998
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 3

- NM

- 2 19

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
99-1288.

#### State ex rel. Gay v. State Personnel Bd. of Review.

In Mandamus. On motion for summary judgment and on motion to dismiss original complaint. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C. J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
# C_2015096EN.01000101.xml

| 23.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 96/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 096/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 89, 16.3.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 81, 9.3.2015

OJ C 73, 2.3.2015

OJ C 65, 23.2.2015

OJ C 56, 16.2.2015

OJ C 46, 9.2.2015

OJ C 34, 2.2.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  1350), the
undersigned, David J Cutler, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of Aspeon, Inc., (the "Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Annual  Report Form 10KSB for the twelve  months  ended June 30, 2004 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1034, and the information  contained in
the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Date:       November 11, 2005

By /s/David J Cutler
   ----------------------
David J Cutler
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer
EX-10.10





 Exhibit 10.10 

21 May 2021 
 AMENDMENT TO THE INTEREST FREE
PROMISSORY NOTE 
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, 
 the undersigned
Anthemis Holdings S.á.r.l., a private limited liability company (société à responsabilité limitée) established and existing under the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg,
having its registered office at 15, Boulevard F.W. Raiffeisen, L-2411 Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register under number B156140, 

hereby promises to pay to the order of Anthemis Digital Acquisitions I Corp, a company registered in the Cayman Islands with registration number
MC-372152, having its registered office at PO Box 309, Ugland House, Grand Cayman, KY1-1104, Cayman Islands (the “Company”), 
 have signed
an interest free promissory note on 3 March 2021 for the amount of seventy-five thousand United States Dollars (USD 75,000) 
 and hereby amends to increase
it to an amount of two hundred thousand United States Dollars (USD 200,000) in immediately available funds at the latest on 24 May 2021 (the “Amended Note”). 

No interest will be charged on the amount due, which shall be payable by the Company within 1 year from the date of the Amended Note. 

The Amended Note is assignable and might, with the consent of both parties hereto, be converted into shares, share premium or any kind of securities issued by
the Company. 
 The Amended Note shall be governed by the laws of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, in particular, the transfer of the Amended Note is subject
to Article 1689 et seq. of the Luxembourg Civil Code. 
 The Courts of the City of Luxembourg have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute arising from
or connected with this Amended Note, including, without limitation, a dispute regarding the existence, validity or termination of this Amended Note or the consequences of its nullity. 

Signature page below 
  

					
	Anthemis Holdings S.à r.l	  	 /s/ Sean Park
	  	 /s/ Amandine Le Floch

	Represented by	  	Sean Park	  	Amandine Le Floch
	Title	  	Class A Manager	  	Class B Manager
			
	Anthemis Digital Acquisitions I Corp 	  	 /s/ Mei Lim
	  	
	Represented by	  	Mei Lim	  	                                     
                   
	Title	  	CFO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

July 23, 2021

ARTHUR JACK SHIPLEY v. CHRISTA ELISE SHIPLEY

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County

No. 16-D-1610 John B Bennett, Judge

___________________________________

No. E2021-00670-COA-R3-CV

___________________________________

Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed this Court lacks jurisdiction 

to consider this appeal.

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Appeal Dismissed

THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II,J.; D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J.; AND JOHN W. MCCLARTY,

J.

Arthur Jack Shipley, Hixson, Tennessee, pro se appellant.

Glenna M. Ramer, Chattanooga, Tennessee, for the appellee, Christa Elise Shipley.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

The notice of appeal filed by the pro se appellant on June 17, 2021, states that 

appellant is attempting to appeal a final judgment entered in the Circuit Court for Hamilton 

County (“the Trial Court”) on May 1, 2019. By Order entered July 13, 2021, this Court 

ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant 

responded to our show cause Order, but failed to show that the appeal was timely filed. 

 A notice of appeal “shall be filed with the clerk of the appellate court within 30 days 

 

1 Rule 10 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals provides:

This Court, with the concurrence of all judges participating in the case, may 

affirm, reverse or modify the actions of the trial court by memorandum opinion 

when a formal opinion would have no precedential value. When a case is decided 

by memorandum opinion it shall be designated “MEMORANDUM OPINION,” 

shall not be published, and shall not be cited or relied on for any reason in any 

unrelated case.

07/26/2021
- 2 -

after the date of entry of the judgment appealed from . . ..” Tenn. R. App. P 4(a). “The 

thirty-day time limit for filing a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional in civil 

cases.” Albert v. Frye, 145 S.W.3d 526, 528 (Tenn. 2004); see also Ball v. McDowell, 288 

S.W.3d 833, 836 (Tenn. 2009). If a notice of appeal is not timely filed, this Court is not at 

liberty to waive the procedural defect. Tenn. R. App. P. 2.; see also Arfken & Assocs., P.A. 

v. Simpson Bridge Co., 85 S.W.3d 789, 791 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002). 

Appellant filed his notice of appeal well beyond thirty days from the date of entry 

of the Trial Court’s final judgment. As appellant failed to file his notice of appeal within 

thirty days of entry of the Trial Court’s judgment, the notice of appeal was untimely filed, 

thus depriving this Court of jurisdiction. This Court is not at liberty to waive the procedural 

defect or to grant an extension of time to file an appeal. This appeal is hereby DISMISSED. 

Costs on appeal are taxed to the appellant, Arthur Jack Shipley, for which execution may 

issue. 

PER CURIAM
From: Jim Tozzi [mailto:btozzi1@cox.net] 

Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:25 PM

To: Page, Steve; Culligan, Kevin

Subject: DOE Role in EPA's Proposed Regulation for New Coal Fired Plants 

Gentlemen:

The Department of Energy spends billions on the development emission control 

technologies. It is important that they participate actively in the formulation of 

EPA’s NSPS for new coal fired plants.

DOE participation in the rulemaking is virtually guaranteed if EPA were to conduct a 

peer review in accordance with the requirements of the Data Quality Act.

Failure to conduct such a peer review could result in the execution of the legal 

strategy contained herein which provides a method for challenging a proposed rule 

because of non-compliance with the peer review requirements specific to the Data 

Quality Act. The strategy is a result of a legal precedent established in the TRAC 

litigation. 

A court is authorized to act before a final rule is issued when the public has been 

denied the opportunity to utilize the results of a DQA peer review in developing 

their comments on a proposed rule. A judicial intervention is warranted to protect the 

right of the public to influence the contents of a final rule. 

Please see the attachment hereto.

Respectfully,

Jim Tozzi 

Center for Regulatory Effectiveness
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 135808 Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 135808 COA: 282405 Genesee CC: 01-007827-FC LONNIE NOKEEMA JOHNSON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 19, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

K ELLY , J., would remand this case to the C ourt of Appeals to decide whether to grant, deny, or order other relief, in accordance with MCR 7.205(D)(2).

d0519 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 27, 2008

Clerk
| 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ John L. Workman      |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | John L. Workman               |   |
|   |   | Executive Vice President and  |   |
|   |   |  Chief Financial Officer |   |
# C_2015205EN.01000101.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 205/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 198, 15.6.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 190, 8.6.2015

OJ C 178, 1.6.2015

OJ C 171, 26.5.2015

OJ C 155, 11.5.2015

OJ C 146, 4.5.2015

OJ C 138, 27.4.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
[771 NYS2d 886]

#### In the Matter of Matthew Weissman, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.

First Department,

February 26, 2004

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Thomas J. Cahill (Raymond Vallejo*of counsel), for petitioner.

No appearance for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

*29Respondent Matthew Weissman was admitted to the practice of law in the State of New York by the First Judicial Department on July 8, 1985. At all times relevant herein, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

Respondent and a codefendant were indicted for various felonies relating to participating in a scheme to defraud the Federal Emergency Management Agency and for stealing money from various government agencies and September 11th related charities. On November 5, 2003, in the Supreme Court, New York County, respondent was convicted after a jury trial of 24 felonies, to wit, scheme to defraud in the first degree in violation of Penal Law § 190.65 (1) (b); grand larceny in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.40 (1); falsifying business records in the first degree in violation of Penal Law § 175.10 (17 counts); grand larceny in the third degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.35 (3 counts); grand larceny in the fourth degree in violation of Penal Law § 155.30 (1); and attempted grand larceny in the third degree in violation of Penal Law §§ 110.00 and 155.35.

By letter dated November 14, 2003, respondent notified the Disciplinary Committee of his felony conviction. The Committee now seeks an order striking respondent’s name from the roll of attorneys, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (b), on the ground that by virtue of his felony conviction he has been automatically disbarred. This motion is timely “since it is well settled that the date of plea or verdict is the date of conviction that triggers disbarment” *(Matter of Christiansen,*220 AD2d 98, 99 [1996]). In any event, respondent has since been sentenced. Respondent has failed to appear or answer the petition. Respondent’s conviction constitutes grounds for automatic disbarment (see Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a], [e]).

Accordingly, petitioner’s motion should be granted, and respondent’s name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective nunc pro tunc to November 5, 2003.

Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Tom, Friedman and Marlow, JJ., concur.

Respondent disbarred, and his name stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York, effective nunc pro tunc to November 5, 2003.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 Nos. 333-32055 and 333-32057) pertaining to the PJ America, Inc., 1996
Stock Ownership Incentive Plan and Non-Employee Directors 1996 Incentive Plan of
our report dated February 3, 2000, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements of PJ America, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
fiscal year ended December 26, 1999.

                                               /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
                                               ---------------------

Birmingham, Alabama
February 18, 2000
#### The Wisconsin River Lumber Company vs. Plumer.

*May 29*

*June 23, 1880.*

*Superfluous Appeal.*

Where there were separate appeals from a judgment and from an order refusing to vacate it, the judgment having been reversed, the other appeal is dismissed.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Portage*County.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Finch & Barber,*and oral argument by *Mr. Barber.*

The cause was submitted for the respondent on the brief of *Geo. W. Cate.*

Lyon, J.

Having reversed the judgment in this cause on another appeal, we must, in accordance with the settled practice of this court, dismiss this appeal, which is from an order denying a motion to vacate such judgment. *Mead v. Walker,*20 Wis., 518; *Groner’s Appeal,*22 Wis., 205.

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-10831

 

CONSOLIDATED CAPITALINSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES, LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted onits corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to besubmitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of thischapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that theregistrant was required to submit and post such files). [ ] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
~ 

.~ -- ,.. --------~ .. , -.. ~ 

• ../·STAT I ON S 

REF ID :A487430 _ 

11/2.6/41 MC-C (57) 

FROM: 

TO: TOKYO (TOGO} WASHINGTON {KOSHI)" 

19 NOVEMBER, 1941 

J-19 

CIRC #2354 (COMPLETE) 

MWLQU BUWTJ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 03-21-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a .~ . •• 

\ ' 
. •• . '!'"'." i ... 

e·· 

;.• / 

-)" -r- O' 

1 

2 

~-

4 

!--¥t-\:1tf,11~} ¥ttfhit~~-+t~f:+"1f N1J{~kJ!' -\-·······+···+···· l·· -i···i : 

:V(/J lfetfxl~i;t~ : w v : -t~L•-t2~tEJBr~Jtv-~t,riifK•'~-z!~rc ! - f..J : 1\J.l : 1-'t : . : (..' : 

.. ::)J~1rc•~•••-1-1 'f.. : . : : : : : : t 1-11 ~ 9 

1.·.x..I"f~J.x:. i··.~·i.t.-..1.~.-.1"¥0.J-.f.:"if.BJ".~A·.·.H .. l::?.~·:y_-.·.r·E1.ts.· .. 1··0.·.·1i.:.».1.r-.-~A.:"i:i' ............... ] ........... ·.·1.· ............. 1·.·.·.·.· .... ·.·.1 .... ·.· .. ]··.·.·.·.-.-.·.·.<i 10 

\Li/f:fJ)J.c.ivf.\·1\olv!PJ~1i1Ac :vfi : r~i_F1xJGic : : : i i : 21 

1 ·F· ((4 Ty 'f'"pt'i"f"i"'J"~'j" IH'lt ·2 r;:·~Tl+l·:.: !C:""Y; "ii rc·~.li· ic;··rH j L~iC" .......... , ........... 1 .......... r ...... -:-· ...... r..... .. .12 

: .. --·-r·-.. t.1 .. ~ .... t. ..... ( .......... r--.0· ........ 1·· ....... ·······--··;.""· ........... /" ........ ......... l .... fJ .......... 1" ..... , .......... l, ..... fi.......... .. ........ , .......... , ........... ,. .......... ,. ......... ; .......... .. 

l~'El51t1@~:.f~1ll~1~~1?-'~-!~!~f{l&1~:b-+-+ 1-+-11 ~~ 15 

16 

17 

18 

19 

20 

21 

22 

23 

24 

25 

26 

27 

28 

29 

30 

31 

i ! j i i i I ! i I ! i ! ; i i : ! i I ; i i I ; 

t~rtHirn~~ijJ~g=f 1ri~1~§~~~-t~1?. : /'f»-:_~~cif_/. -·~ ~-~--~.>/-
----- -

•,· ', ' .. SF .DE JAB S ·1 NOV 41 

REF ID:A487430 .378d 

~ 352 SCDE TOKYO 57 19 8118 JG 

KOSHI WASHINGTOkDC . 

MWLQU ~UIT~XYJBK SUMTB EQFVD LURHW XEZWO JCRQB YFXYA YCQXL 

FSUHX WTEBH EQPUC NUQOL YVZBC XEXUN LZKAR XBKRE LBVLM WNKGK 

JQKLK NEOHC URUXI EWUUE NZOQG INUSO DGFGU VHTBI SRLGY GXBHT 

UXVQG UOQGG XDXIO GLQKN CVUOM XHPBE PGLEO YCVVE CGFZE CCUBQ 

OSGLX LMUJS 11180 fGUCB UJXPU ALLKL MMTNE WCGTK XHPKH BZBZV 

48888 cclr.KM\RG~RV~i~SIMO .. ~·~o ~bi- ' TOGO. 

1 ' ' ~Fr') °') 5" ~ ~I. '·L ~ 1152 S GL 

9160