WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc

. May 7 , 2015 

### May 7, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System West Building Ground Floor, Room w12

- 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

of the F ederal Aviation Regulations

Dear Sir or Madam:

WinTec Arrowmaker , Inc. (WinTec) respectfully requests an exemption from several provisions
of the Federal Aviation Regulations, which are described below and in Appendix A. This request
is made p ursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the

“ Reform Act ” ) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11

.

The Specific Sections of 14 CFR for which WinTec seeks an Exemption are as f ollows:

14 C.F.R. Part 21, subpart H

14 C.F.R. Part 27

14 C.F.R. 45.23b

14 C.F.R. 45.27a

14 C.F.R. 61.113a&b

14 C.F.R. 61.133a

14 C.F.R. 91.7a

14 C.F.R. 91.9b2&C

14 C.F.R. 91.103b

14 C.F.R. 91.109a

14 C.F.R. 91.119

14 C.F.R. 91.121

14 C.F.R. 91.151a1&b

14 C.F.R. 91.203a&b

14 C.F.R. 91.405a

14 C.F.R. 91.407a1

14 C.F.R. 91.409a1&2

14 C.F.R. 91.417a&bExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page 2

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc.

May 7 , 2015 

### This request is motivated primarily by the desire to maximize safety in infrastructure and
operations. While an exemption would not eliminate the current need for in

- person visual
inspection required by various federal regulatory departments, it would allow WinTec to broadly
evaluate assets and operations with Small Unmanned Aerial Systems ( sUAS ) , resulting in a safer

and more efficient infrastructure network with reduced environmental impact . Accordingly, the grant of an exemption is consistent with Congress’ intent, reflected in Section 333 of the FAA
Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (Modernization Act), that safe operation of systems be
permitted in the national airspace prior to the issuance of final regulations governing general use
of these systems. The granting of these exemptions would permit WinTec to use the PUMA,
Flare Quad

- Copter and Stork Octo

- Copter sUAS (described in Appendix B) to conduct sa fe,
efficient operations in the vocation of aerial photography, crop monitoring, photogrammetry,
disaster survey, search and rescue, power

- line inspections, antenna inspections, and bridge
inspections

, as well as research and development.

Appendix A discusses each rule and explains why exemptions pursuant to the proposal set forth
in this letter are appropriate, provide an equivalent level of safety

, and are in the public interest.

Appendix B provides the manufacturers information regarding the desig n, aircraft performance,

and fail

- safe features of the sUAS that WinTec proposes to use . We have provided manufacturer
information related to operating limitations, normal and emergency procedures, and maintenance
and inspection procedures. As we add aircr aft designs, we will update this appendix
appropriately.

Appendix C provides the WinTec Arrowmaker Inc. Operating Instruction /Program Policy for
aircrew training and operations covered under this Exemption Request . It also contains WinTec

Chief Pilot Joseph T

. (Todd) Madison’s qualifications and certifications

.

Background Information

WinTec Arrowmaker Inc. (WinTec) is a Service

- Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business

founded in 1991 and organized for the purpose of supporting the Special Operations Forces
(SOF) and Counter Terrorism (CT) community’s initiatives and organizations

. WinTec has over 15 years’ experience with the testing, modification, repair, maintenance and training of

numerous Department of Defense (DoD) Tactical s UAS

.

W hen the United States Special Operations Command ( USSOCOM ) executed a Combat Mission
Need Statement (CMNS) in 2002 to purchase 150 Pointer s UAS’s using an existing Research
and Development ( R&D ) contract, responsibility for logistics support, training, development of

tac tics, and extending the capability of the hand

- launched s UAS was assigned to WinTec’s
Prototype Maintenance Facility (PMF) in Tampa, FL. Later, similar responsibilities for the

Raven s UAS were added. WinTec PMF personnel developed and conducted operation al userExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page 3

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### training courses for operations, field maintenance, and operational tactics and procedures for the

tactical employment of the Pointer and Raven. From 2002

- 2006, WinTec trained SOF personnel
prior to deployment to the combat Area of Operations (AOR ). As a result, WinTec trained over
800 SOF operators and instructors on the Pointer and Raven s UAS. WinTec flew over 11,000
hours of flight time and over 3,000 hours of instructor time in support of this effort.

In support of the Pathfinder Advanced Con cept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) and the

s UAS A CTD , WinTec formed a Field Technical Unit at its Prototype Maintenance Facility (FTU

PMF ) in Tampa, FL. FTU PMF was further designated as the Specialized Repair Activity (SRA)

for the Raven s UAS . As such, WinTec w as responsible for conducting both levels of
maintenance on the Raven, FTU and SRA. FTU authorized repairs included, replacing the
propeller, stabilator, wing tips, center wing, minor wing/fuselage repair, replacement/recharging

of batte ries

, and replacement of those parts generally referred to as consumable, e.g., stabilator
clips, and rudder and stabilator pushrods. SRA maintenance encompassed all maintenance tasks
above the unit level, including limited depot level repairs. In the perf ormance of SRA
maintenance actions, WinTec normally required special tools, test equipment, and/or special
training and skills.

In support of the Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) A3 UAS mission since

2005, WinTec developed significant capabilities and experience in technical management,
program management, training, and logistics for UAS

. WinTec supports AFSOC’s command

wide unmanned systems program by providing analysis, research, training, operation and
airspace management support to implement and sustain the required elements of this program.
WinTec subject matter experts drafted, maintained and provided operational guidance in support
of USSOCOM Tier I, II, and III unmanned systems. W inTec helped develop cour seware and
syllabus for classroom training; developed and monitored standardized training programs for
each system; developed and maintained a database to track operational status of command and
Air Force unmanned systems; and provided expertise to integra te unmanned systems in AFSOC’s force mix and throughout USSOCOM components. WinTec participates in UAS
Conferences and Symposia that are relevant to s UAS support to its customers. This ensures
WinTec is able to maintain currency in both the emerging system/sub

- system and payload
technologies being fielded and the operational employment of these assets.

WinTec also provide d support to the AFSOC Special Tactics Community, by providing s UAS
program management to the 720th Operation Support Squadron and i ts associated units assigned
globally. As part of this effort, WinTec provided Technical Management, Program Management,
Training, and Logistics support to AFSOC Special Tactics Community ’s s UAS. In support of
this effort, WinTec personnel performed s UAS pilot and instructor duties, operator maintenance

of s UAS, and simulator operations.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page 4

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### For the last 8 years, WinTec has provided s UAS training, operations, and maintenance support to
the Army Research L aboratory ( ARL ) research and development efforts. WinTec pilots a myriad
of fixed and rotary wing s UAS, as well balloons and Aerostats , in performing tasks , to includ e studies, technical investigations, research, development, experimentation, limited acquisition and
logistics support for systems and compo nents supporting technology upgrade and modernization

programs of DoD and other Government Agencies.

WinTec is currently a subcontractor to BOSH Global Services on the US Army’s Small UAS
Training, Maintenance, and Program Management contract. Wintec is t he primary performer of
depot

- level maintenance for the Army’s fleet of s UAS. In support of this contract, WinTec also
provides s UAS training support to augment BOSH capabilities

.

Name and A ddress of Applicant:

WinTec Arrowmaker

, Inc.

Michael A. Zonfrelli, President
5410 W. Tyson Ave. Suite E
Tampa, FL. 33611

Z onfrelliM@arrowmaker.com
(813) 805

- 2714

Primary Point of C ontact : Joseph T. ( Todd ) Madison, Chief Pilot

M adisonT@arrowmaker.com

, (813) 805

- 2714

Sincerely,

Michael A. Zonfrelli

President WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc

Appendices

Appendix A: Rules Discussion and Exemption Justification

Appendix B: Manufacturer Small Unmanned Aerial System Information

Appendix C: WinTec Operating Instruction for Small Unmanned Aircraft System

Operations and Chief Pilot Qualifications and CertificationsExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 1

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

## APPENDIX A : Rules Discussion and Exemption Justification

Exemption Request and Equivalent Level of Safety for the Applicable Rules

1. 0 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpar t H: Airworthiness Certificates, 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) (1) Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR §91.203 (a) (1).

Given the size and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by WinTec

, an exemption from Part 21 Subpart H meets the requirements of a n equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act (49 U.S.C.§44701 (f)) and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthiness certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the particular UAS. In all cases, an analysis of these criteria demonstrates that the UAS operated without an airworthiness certificate, in the restricted environment and under the conditions proposed will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft (fixed wing or rotorcraft) operating with an airworthiness certificate without the restrictions and conditions proposed.

The s UAS to be operated under the exemption are less than 20 lbs. fully loaded, carr y neither a pilot nor passenger, carr y no explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, an d operate exclusively within an area pre

- disclosed and in compliance with conditions s et forth in the Manual. Unlike other civil aircraft, operations under this exemption will be tightly controlled and monitored by both the operator, pursuant to the Manual’s requirements, and under the requirements and in compliance with local public safety requirem ents to provide security for the area of operation. The FAA will have advance notice of all operations. The automated safety

features

, including redundant sensor systems as described in Appendix B

, high light the design intentions towards safety and reliabi lity. Lastly, application of these same criteria demonstrates that there is no credible threat to national security posed by the UAS, due to its size, speed of operation, location of operation, lack of explosive materials or flammable liquid fuels, and

ina bility to carry a substantial external load.

2. 0 14 C.F.R. Part 27 Airworthiness Standards: Normal Category Rotorcraft 14 C.F.R. Part 27 sets forth the procedural requirements for airworthiness certification of normal category rotorcraft.

To the extent the Flare Quad and Stork Octo would otherwise require certification under Part 27, WinTec seeks an exemption from Part 27’s airworthiness standards for the same reasons identified in the request for exemption from 14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H.

3. 0 14 C.F.R. § 45.23 a & b Marking of the Aircraft 14 C.F.R. § 45.27(a) Rotorcraft. Regulation 45.23 provides: (a) Each operator of an aircraft must display on that aircraft marks consisting of the Roman capital letter “N” (denoting United States registration) followed b y the registration number of the aircraft. Each suffix letter used in the marks displayed must also be a Roman capital letter.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 2

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### (b) When marks include only the Roman capital letter "N" and the registration number is displayed on limited, restricted or light

- sport category aircraft or experimental or provisionally certificated aircraft, the operator must also display on that aircraft ne ar each entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station, in letters not less than 2 inches nor more than 6 inches high, the words "limited," "restricted," "light

- sport," "experimental," or "provisional," as applicable. Each operator of a rotorcraft must display on that rotorcraft horizontally on both surfaces of the cabin, fuselage, boom, or tail the markings required by §45.23.

WinTec’s s UA S ’s hav e no entrance to the cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which the markings can be placed. Given the size of the sUA S , two

- inch lettering will be impossible. Official markings systems for small UAS have not been established for operations inside the NAS. The equivalent level of safety is provided by marking the PUMA , Flare Q uad and the Stork O cto
with the Company Logo and a bar code serial number on the fuselage. WinTec is prepared to fulfill any other request by the FAA to this topic in accordance to §45.29 (f) where the pilot, observer and others working with the sUA S will see the identification of the sUA S

. The FAA has issued the following exemptions to this regulation to Exemptions Nos. 10700, 8738, 10167

and 10167A.

4. 0 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b) ; 61.133(a) : Private P ilot Privileges and Limitations; Pilot in Command; Commercial Pilot Privileges and Limitatio ns. Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non

- commercial operations

.

Because the UAS will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of safety of current operations because unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the sUAS is remotely controlled with no living being on board. Section 61.133(a) requires an individual with a commercial pilot’s license to be pilot in command of an aircraft for compensation or hire. Because WinTec has been conducting safe, sUAS Operations

since 2002 and has a proven track record with combined flight hours well into the thousands, we propose WinTec pilots not be required to hold a commercial or private pilot certification. As outlined in Appendix C, WinTec has detailed sUAS flight training and operation s guidance and

f light evaluation criteria for all pilots. Several of WinTec’s pilots hold multiple sUAS training

certifications . In addition, WinTec has sUAS pilots with Government Flight Representative (GFR) qualifications

, as well as Commercial Airman and A &P license s

. Also, Appendix B clearly outlines the dependability of each sUAS as well as their redundant safety features utilize.

4.1 WinTec Arrowmaker Inc. Safety Operations & Procedures Overview: To further explain WinTec ’s approach to providing an equivalent level of safety through the exemption of 14 C.F.R. § 61.113 (a) & (b); 61.133(a): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations; Pilot in Command; Commercial Pilot Privileges and Limitations , the following paragraphs describe WinTec’s SUAS Flight procedures.

4.2 Technology Considerations:

WinTec uses b est

- in

- class, tried and proven technologies that are in advanced iterations.

Software from highly

- reputable industry partners will include features :Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 3

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### 1. Auto Return to launch point if communication signal were to be severed. If the sUAS loses
communications, the sUAS will have capability to return to a pre

- determined location within
the Security Perimeter and land.

2. Auto Ret urn to launch point if the battery were to drop lower than nominal level.

3. Flights will be terminated at 25% battery power reserve.

4. Live video for operator gives real

- time positioning feedback. In other words, we can monitor
the scene from the vehicle's per spective for collision avoidance, and to maintain spatial

orientation.

5. The sUAS will have the capability to abort a flight in case of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

6. A hand controller or laptop contains operating information to ascertain vehicle heal th at all

times

, including but not limited to : speed of sUAS

, direction of flight, sUAS speed, winds,
altitude, range and bearing from home, link quality status, heading, battery voltage level and

the number of GPS satellites.

7. GPS lock supplies for return

- to

- home (RTH). Should Command and Control (C2) link
failures occur (highly improbable), vehicle returns automatically to the point of launch and

lands

. 8. Altitude information will be provided to the sUAS pilot via a digitally encoded telemetric

data feed, which downlinks from the aircraft to a ground

- based on

- screen display. This
altitude information will be generated by equipment installed on board the aircraft, using
GPS triangulation, or digitally encoded barometric altimeter, or radio altimeter, or any
combination thereof. Prior to each flight, a zero altitude initiation point will be established
and confirmed for accuracy by the pilot.

4.3 Mechanical/Physical:

1. We will fly line

- of

- sight (LOS)

, only. The vehicle will always remain in direct LOS to the
pil ot, thus eliminating the concern of signal severance (flying behind objects/walls).

2. All the sUAS will weigh less than 20 lbs. and travel at less than 50 knots IAS

. 3. Batteries should far exceed the capacity required for actual flight time.

4. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 5 00 feet AGL.

5. Fireproof bags will be used for storage and charging of high capacity Lipo batteries on

- site.

6. s UA S operated under this exemption will be marked in accordance with 14 CFR part 45 or as

ot herwise authorized by the FAA.

4.4 Personnel:

1. Spotters ensure safe operation and act as a redundant set of eyes for operators (pilot, gimbal
op, director)

2. A mission briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned sUAS operations prior to each day’s activities. It will be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing duties within
the boundaries of the safety perimeter be present for this briefing.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 4

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### 3. The operator will obtain the consent of all persons involved in the sUAS operations and

ensure tha t only consenting persons will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operations.

4. Observer and pilot will at all times be able to communicate by voice.

5. Written and/or oral permission from the relevant property holders will be obtained.

6. Pilot and observer will have been trained and receive an annual flight evaluation on the
particular UAS to be operated.

7. Pilot and observer will not fly unless they have a current second class medical certificate.

4.5 Operations:

1. The sUAS will weigh less than 20 pounds

, i ncluding energy source(s) and equipment.
Operations authorized by this petition of exemption are limited to the following aircraft
described in Appendix B ; Puma, Flare Quad Copter, and Stork Octo Copter

. Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition amendment
to this request.

2. The s UA S will not be flown greater than 50 knots IAS

. 3. Flights will be operated at an altitude of no more than 5 00 feet above ground level (AGL), as
indicated by the procedures specified in the operator’s manual. Al l altitudes reported to ATC

will be in feet AGL.

4. The s UA S will be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times. This
requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than corrective

le nses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued medical certificate.

5. All operations will utilize a visual observer (VO). The VO will be used to satisfy the VLOS
requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS capability. The VO and PIC will be

able to comm unicate verbally at all times.

6. The sUAS O perat ing Instruction/Program Policy included as Appendix C , sUAS Operator’s

Manuals, and this petition of exemption will be maintained and made available to the
Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and limitations in
this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating instruction/program policy or the operator’s manual, the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and will be

follow ed. Otherwise, the operator w ill follow the procedures as outlined in its operator’s

manual. The manufacturer may update or revise its operator’s manual. It is the operator’s
responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised documents to the
Administrator upon req uest

. 7. P rior to each flight the PIC will inspect the s UAS to ensure it is in a condition for safe flight.
If the inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the s UAS, the aircraft is
prohibited from operating until the necessary mainte nan ce has been p erformed and the s UAS

is found to be in a condition for safe flight. The Ground Co ntrol Station, if utilized, will be

included in the preflight inspection. All maintenance and alterations will be properly

documented in the aircraft records.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 5

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### 8. Any s UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the s UAS operation or
flight characteristics, e.g. replacement of a flight critical component, will undergo a functional test flight in accordance with the operator’s manual. The PIC who conducts the
functional test flight will make an entry in the s UAS aircraft records of the flight. The
requirements and procedures for a functional test fligh t and aircraft record entry will be added to the operator’s manual.

9. The operator will follow the manufacturer’s s UAS aircraft/component, maintenance,
overhaul, replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements. When unavailable, aircraft
maintenance/component/overhaul, replacement, and inspecti on/maintenance requirements

will be established and ide ntified in the operator’s manual. At a minimum, req uirements for
the following will be included in the operator’s manual:

a. Actuators / Servos

b. Transmission (single rotor)

c. Power plant (motors)

d. Propellers

e. Electronic speed controller

f. Batteries

g. Mechanical dynami c components (single rotor)

h. Remote command and control

i. Ground control station (if used)
j. Any other components as determined by the operator

10. The Pilot In Command (PIC) will possess a current flight Evaluation and at least a c urrent

second

- class medical certificate.

11. During training, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for
flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC will operate the s UA S with
appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

12. Prior to any flight operations authorized by this petition of exemption, the PIC and VO will
have successfully completed a qualification process, as outlined in the WinTec Arrowmaker,
Inc. (WinTec) Small Unmanned Aircraft S ystem (SUAS) Operating Instruction/ Program
Policy in Appendix C.

13. The s UA S will not be operated directly over any person, except authorized and consenting
personnel, nor below an altitude that is hazardous to persons or property on the surface in the

event of a s UAS failure or emergency.

14. Regarding the distance from participating persons, the operator’s manual has safety
mitigations for authorized and consenting personnel. At all times, those persons will be
essential to the operations. All nonparticipating persons will be kept at a safe distance from
the operation.

15. Before conducting operations, the radio frequency spectrum used for operation and control of

the s UA S will comply with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) or other

ap propriate government oversight agency requirements.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 6

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### 16. The documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 will be available to the PIC at the

Ground Control Station of the s UAS any time the aircraft is operating. These documents will

be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The s UA S will remain clear and yield the right of way to all other manned operations and
activities at all times (including, but not limited to, ultralight vehicles, parachute activities,

para sailing activities, hang gliders, etc.).

18. s UAS operations will not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1.

− All operations will be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC).

− Flights under special visual flight rules (SVFR) are not authorized.

19. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical boundaries
of the operational area will be reported to the FAA’s UAS Integration Office (AFS

- 80)

within 24 hours. Accidents will be reported to the National Transportation Safety Board
(NTSB) per instructions contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov. Further flight
operations will not be conducted until the incident, accident, or transgression is reviewed by

AFS

- 80 and authorization to resume operations is provided.

WinTec notes FAA notice N

- 8900.227, unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) operational Approval, at 20

- 21 (July 30, 2013). The FAA has the statutory authority, granted at 49 U.S.C. §44701(f) to waive the pilot requirements for commercial operations.

By following these procedures, WinTec will maintain its flawless flight history and given these conditions and restrictions, an equivalent level of safety will be provided by allowing WinTec to operate the PUMA, Flare Quad and Stork Octo without a private pi lot’s certificate or a commercial pilot’s certificate, under the conditions set forth herein.

5. 0 14 C.F.R. §91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness.
The regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy

condition.

As there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the aircraft flown by WinTec , should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining airworthiness. Given the size of the aircraft and the requirements contained in the Manual for maintenan ce and use of safety check listed in Appendix B prior to each flight, an equivalent level of safety will be provided.

6. 0 14 C.F.R. § 91.9 (b) (2) (c) : Civil Aircraft Flight Manual in the Aircraft.
Section 91.9 (b) (2) provides:
No p erson may operate a U.S.

- registered civil aircraft ...
(2) For which an Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual is not required by §21.5 of this chapter, unless there is available in the aircraft a current approved airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual,

approve d manual material, markings, and placards, or any combination thereof.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 7

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### The sUAS, given its size and configuration has no ability or place to carry such a flight manual
on the aircraft, not only because there is no pilot on board, but because there is no ro om or capacity to carry such an item on the aircraft. The equivalent level of safety will be maintained
by keeping the flight manual at the ground control point where the pilot flying the sUAS will

have immediate access to it. The FAA has issued the follow ing exemptions to this regulation:
Exemption Nos. 8607, 8737, 8738, 9299, 9299A, 9565, 9565B, 10167, 10167A, 10602, 32827,

and 10700.

7. 0 14 C.F.R. § 91.103: Preflight action
This regulation requires each pilot in command to take certain actions before flight to insure the
safety of flight.

As FAA approved rotorcraft flight manuals will not be provided for the aircraft an exemption
will be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be provided as set forth in Appendix B. The

PIC will take all actions inc luding reviewing weather, flight battery requirements, landing and
takeoff distances and aircraft performance data before initiation of flight.

8. 0 14 C.F.R. §91.109: Flight instruction : Section 91.103 provides that no person may operate a civil aircraft ( except a manned free
balloon) that is being used for flight instruction unless that aircraft has fully functioning dual

controls.

s U AS and remotely piloted aircraft, by their design do not have fully functional dual controls.
Flight control is accomplished through the use of a control box that communicates with the
aircraft via radio communications. Also, a flight plan is created through the mission planner
software on a laptop to establish fail

- safe settings and can be adjusted during flight

. The FAA
has approved exemptions for flight training without fully functional dual controls for a number
of aircraft and for flight instruction in e xperimental aircraft. See Exemption Nos.5778K &
9862A. The equivalent level of safety provided by the fact that neither a pilot nor passengers will

be carried in the aircraft and the PIC will be experienced and qualified with the sUAS before
flying

.

9. 0 14 C.F.R. §91.119 (c ) : Minimum safe altitudes
Except when necessary for takeoff or landing, no person may operate an aircraft below the
following altitudes:
(c) Over other than congested areas. An altitude of 500 feet above the surface, except over open
water or sparsely populated areas. In those cases, the aircraft may not be operated closer than 500
feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure.

Because aerial survey, mapping and inspections work must be accomplished at relatively low

altitudes and at altitudes less than 500 feet AGL ; and operations above 500 feet AGL pose aExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 8

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### heightened risk of collision with another aircraft, safety can only be assured through the grant of

an exemption to Section 91.119.

10. 0 14 C.F.R. §91.121 Altimeter Settings

Thi s regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate
altimeter setting available before departure.”

As the sUAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an
exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator,
pursuant to the Manual and Safety Check list, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on
the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

11. 0 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions
(a) Prohibits an individual from beginning “a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless
(considering wind and forecast weather con ditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of
intended landing, and, a ssuming normal cruising speed.
(1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes
(b) No person may begin a flight in a rotorcraft under VFR conditions unless (co nsidering wind
and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing
and, assuming normal cruising speed, to fly after that for at least 20 minutes.
(2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes.

Oper ating the sUAS in a pre

- defined area with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel does not raise
the type of risk contemplated by §91.151

. sUAS flights for the FLARE Quad and Stork Octo

woul d be limited to approximately 15 minutes in length. All sUAS will be flown during the day,
within VLOS, battery power levels are constantly observed and when the capacity drops to
approximately 25% reserve level the pilot will have an adequate amount of power to return to the
landing zone

. For added safety, WinTec sUAS pilo ts have/will always fly with a “Falcon

Tracker” , radio locating device attached to the sUAS

. Therefore , if there is an un

- intended
landing, the pilot will be able to quickly and accurately retrieve the sUAS. Given the limitations

on the s UAS’s proposed fli ght area and the location of its proposed operations within a
predetermined area, a longer time frame for sUAS flight s in daylight VFR conditions is

reasonable.

Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior

exe mptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate withou t compliance with FAR 91.151 (a ). Operating the small UAS, in a tightly controlled area where
only people and property owners or official representatives who have signed wa ivers will be
allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that
Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 9

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### Additiona lly, limiting sUAS flights to 15 minutes would greatl y reduce the utility for which the
exemption will be granted.

Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to
approximately 15 minutes or 25% of battery power whichever happens first. This restriction

would be m ore than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone from anywhere in
its limited operating area.

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745,

10673, and 10808.

12. 0 14 C.F.R. §91.203 (a) and (b): Carrying Civil Aircraft Certification and Registration
The regulation provides in pertinent part:
(a) Except as provided in § 91.715, no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has within it
the following:
(1) An app ropriate and current airworthiness certificate. . . .
(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certificate required by
paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is displayed at

the cabi n or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew.

The UAS is operated without an onboard pilot. As such, there is no ability or place to carry
certification and registration documents or to display them on the sUAS. An equivalent level of
safety will be achieved by keeping these documents at the ground control point where the pilot
flying the sUAS will have immediate access to them; to the extent they are applicable to the
sUAS. The FAA has issued numerous exemptions to this regulation. A representative sample of
other exceptions includes Exemption Nos. 9565, 9665, 9789, 9789A, 9797, 9797A, 9816A, and

10700.

13. 0 14 C.F.R. §91.405 (a); 407 (a) (1); 409 (a) (2); 417(a) & (b): Maintenance Inspections
These regulations require that an aircraf t operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspected as
prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in
paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this
chapte r...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43.

Given that these section s and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate,
these sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accompl ished by the operator
pursuant to the flight manual and operating handb ook as referenced in the Manual (See
Appendix B)

. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these small UASs are very
limited in size and will carry a small payload and operate only in controlled areas for limited
periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAS can land immediately and w ill be operating
from no higher than 5 00 feet AGL. For added safety, WinTec sUAS pilots will always fly with aExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page A

- 10

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### “Falcon Tracker” radio locating device attached to the sUAS

. Therefore , if there is an un

intended landing, the pilot will be able to quickly and accurately retrieve the sUAS. The Pilot
also has a flight data recorder on the laptop and can review the past flight for any anomalies. As
provided in the Manual, the operator will ensure that the FLARE Quad and STORK Octo are
nearly maintenance free, the y perform automatic pre

- flight checks and any failure will prevent
the operator from arming the sUAS for flight. The PUMA, FLARE and STORK have pre

- flight
checks of the battery levels, motors , compass , magnetometer, Loss of Link (re turn to home
location) s ettings and the PUMA has a pitot check.

Qualified operators of the UAS ensure it is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform
required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is
the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy

conditi on to p rovide the equivalent level of safety.

14. 0 SUMMARY
Petitioner seeks relief from the requirements of 333 Aircraft Exemption Status, 14
C.F.R Part 21, subpart H

, Part 27

, 45.23b , 45.27a

, 61.113a&b

, 61.133a

, 91.7a

, 91.9b2&C

, 91.103b

, 91.109a

, 91.119

, 91.121

, 91.151a1&b

, 91.203a&b

, 91.405a

, 91.407a1

, 91.409a1&2

, 91.417a&b to implement sUAS operations throughout the United States for the commercial
operations of aerial photography, crop monitoring, photogrammetry, disaster survey, search and

rescue, power

- line inspections, antenna inspections, bridge inspections as well as research and
development . Operations will be s olely during daylight hours, within VLOS by a qualified

operator. In general, sUAS operations are intended to be conducted in areas remote from both
congested areas and airports. The nature of operations anticipated by WinT ec Arrowmaker Inc.
requires that the sUAS be flown at relatively low altitudes. WinTec expects that in most

i nstances, the sUAS will be flown less than 75 feet from the highest structure along the path of
the sUAS and in no instances will be flown higher t h an 5 00 feet above the ground. Accordingly,

the risk of interference with other aircraft is minimal.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 1

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

## APPENDIX B : Manufacturer Small Unmanned Aerial System Information

1.0 FLARE Quad:

1.1 FLARE Key Features include

 Highest quality carbon fiber and aluminum constructed 'Rapid Deploy' folding airframe

 Fully adjustable rail supported brushless gimbal system powered by 32

- bit AlexMos

 Gimbal supports wide range of cameras and is fully adjustable

 180 Degrees + gimbal tilt angle, from facing over 90' straight down to 90' straight up, ideal for

inspection work

 Adjustable rail supported battery bay for mounting difference size batteries, on top or bottom

 High strength impact resistant top dome cover with integrated LED, Safety Switch and USB

interface

 Re movable airframe hatch for easy access to all electronics with no tools required!

 Quick release landing gear legs with clip on holder that setup in seconds, again no tools needed

 Vibration damping rail system that can be setup for different camera/payload weights

 Vibration damping motor mount system for high frequency motor vibration reduction

 Airframe side panel enclosures ensure electronics are protected and hidden

 X8 Setup supported with motor mounts and cut outs for ESC's

1.2 FLARE Advanced GPS Features

 3DR Pixhawk GPS Flight controller with advanced GPS Features

 'Follow Me' Have the FLARE follow you or your subject around

 'Loiter' Accurate GPS position and altitude hold modes keep your drone where you want itExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 2

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015  'Return to Home' With a flip of the switch h ave the drone return home and land autonomously

 Advanced Way

- point navigation, mission planning and more!

1.3 FLARE Components

 Ready to fly SteadiDrone FLARE quad

- copter

 Integrated rail supported brushless gimbal system powered by 32

- bit AlexMos

 4 x 650Kv 3506 powerful and efficient SteadiDrone brushless motors

 25A Quattro ESC Motor controller

 4 x 12” APC SF Props
Advanced GPS 3DR Pixhawk Flight controller with data telemetry system

 16Ch FRSKy Taranis 2.4Ghz Advanced digital radio system with telemetry

 5200mAh 4S SteadiDrone power pack

 AC/DC Battery charger kit

 Landing gear clip on holder

 LiPo alarm checker

1.4 FLARE Specifications

 Camera

- Cannon PowerS hot S110 digital

 Flight Endurance

- up to 18min

 Max Additional Payload

- Gimbal 250g (0.6lbs) / Drone 800g (1.8lbs)

 Weight (Excluding battery & payload)

- 1.7kg / (3.7lbs) RTF

 Weight (Including battery & payload)

- 2.2kg / (4.9lbs) RTF

 Max AUW

- 3020g / (6.7lbs)

 Dimensions open (L x W x H) : 475 x 644 x 207mm (18.7 x 25.4 x 8.1in)

 Dimensions folded (L x W x H) : 482 x 219 x 115mm (18.9 X 8.6 X 4.5in)

 Diagonal length : 677mm / (26.6in.)

 Weight Airframe: 970g / (2.1lbs)

1.5 3DR Pixhawk Auto Pilot

Features

 Advanced 32 bit ARM Cortex® M4 Processor running NuttX RTOS

 14 PWM/servo outputs (8 with failsafe and manual override, 6 auxiliary, high

- power compatible)

 Abundant connectivity options for additional peripherals (UART, I 2 C, CAN)

 Integrated backup system for in

- flight recovery and manual override with dedicated processor and

stand

- alone power supply

 Backup system integrates mixing, providing consistent autopilot and manual override mixing

modes

 Redundant power supply inputs and automatic failover

 External safety button for easy motor activation

 Multicolor LED indicator

 High

- power, multi

- tone piezo audio indicator

 microSD card for long

- time high

- rate logging

Microprocessor:

 32

- bit STM32F427 Cortex M4 core with FPU

 168 MHz/256 KB RAM/2 MB Flash

 32 bit STM32F103 failsafe co

- processorExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 3

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 Sensors:

 ST Micro L3GD20 3

- axis 16

- bit gyroscope

 ST Micro LSM303D 3

- axis 14

- bit accelerometer / magnetometer

 Invensense MPU 6000 3

- axis accelerometer/gyroscope

 MEAS MS5611 barometer

1.6 FrSky 2.4GHz ACCST Taranis X9D radio transmitter

 Number of Channels: Up to 16 channels

 Operating Voltage Range: 6~15V (2S, 3S Lipos are acceptable)

 Operating Current: 260mA maximum (both RF module and backlit are on)

 Operating Temperature:

- 10~60 °C

 Backlight LCD Screen: 212*64, monochrome

 Model Memories: 60 (extendible by SD card)

 Compatibility: FrSky X series, D series and V8

- II series rec eivers

1.7 F rSky X8R 8/16ch full duplex telemetry receiver

 Dimension: 46.47×26.78×14.12mm (L × W × H)

 Weight: 16.6g

 Number of Channels: 16CH (1~8ch from conventional channel outputs, 1~16ch from SBUS port

 or combine two X8R to become a 16 channels receiver )

 With RSSI PWM output (0~3.3V)

 Operating Voltage Range: 4.0~10V

 Operating Current: 100mA@5V

 Operating Range: full range (>1.5km)

 Firmware Upgradeable

 Compatibility: FrSky DFT/DJT/DHT/DHT

- U in D_mode

 FrSky Taranis X9D/XJT in D8 mode

 FrSky Taranis X9D/XJT in D16 mode

1.8 FLARE Battery
One SteadiDrone 5200mAh 4S Battery

1.9 FrSky Battery Voltage Sensor This is a two Way Telemetry System’s Accessory. There are three voltage ranges to choose: 1S LiPo for battery voltage range from 0V~6.6V, up to 3S LiPo for 0V~13.2V and up to 5S LiPo for 0V~19.8V.

1.10 External Monitor This 7 inches FPV monitors has HDMI and AV, built in 5.8GHz Wireless receiver

Wireless Receiver Channel ( MHz )

CH2 CH3 CH4 CH5 CH6 CH7

5685 5665 5645 5885 5905 5925

5845 5825 5805 5785 5765 5745

5752 5771 5790 5809 5828 5847

5760 5780 5800 5820 5840 5860Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 4

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### 2.0 STORK Octo:

2.1 Frame is a Tarot T18 1250 size octocopter

2.2 Stork Octo Specifications:



## • Camera

- Sony Block, 30X Zoom, 680line



## • Flight Endurance

- 10

- 20min



## • Max Additional Payload

- 2.3kg (5lbs)



## • Weight (Excluding battery & payload)

- 4.9kg / (11lbs) RTF



## • Weight (Including battery & payload)

- 9.1kg / (20lbs) RTF



## • Max AUW

- 11.3kg / (25lbs)



## • Dimensions open (L x W x H): 1346.2 x 1346.2 x 406.4mm (53 x 53 x 16in)



## • Dimensions folde d (L x W x H): 1346.2 x 457 x 127mm (53 X 18 X 5inDiagonal length : 1250mm / (49.2in.)



## • Weight Airframe: 2131.9g / (4.7lbs)Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 5

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 2. 3 3DR Pixhawk Auto Pilot

Features

 Advanced 32 bit ARM Cortex® M4 Processor running NuttX RTOS

 14 PWM/servo outputs (8 with failsafe and manual override, 6 auxiliary, high

- power compatible)

 Abundant connectivity options for additional peripherals (UART, I 2 C, CAN)

 Integrated backup system for in

- flight recovery and manual override with dedicated processor and

stand

- alone power supply

 Ba ckup system integrates mixing, providing consistent autopilot and manual override mixing

modes

 Redundant power supply inputs and automatic failover

 External safety button for easy motor activation

 Multicolor LED indicator

 High

- power, multi

- tone piezo audio indicator

 microSD card for long

- time high

- rate logging

Microprocessor:

 32

- bit STM32F427 Cortex M4 core with FPU

 168 MHz/256 KB RAM/2 MB Flash

 32 bit STM32F103 failsafe co

- processor

Sensors:

 ST Micro L3GD20 3

- axis 16

- bit gyroscope

 ST Micro LSM303D 3

- axis 14

- bit accelerometer / magnetometer

 Invensense MPU 6000 3

- axis accelerometer/gyroscope

 MEAS MS5611 barometer

2. 4 Eight Tarot 5008 High Power Brushless Motors with Tarot 1755 Carbon Propellers

 KV : 340kv

 Poles : 14

 No. of Li

- Po cell : 6S

 No load current : 0.6A @ 10V

 Max thrust : 3.7kg with 1855 prop, 25V@26A input

 Max Power : 700W / 40A

 Dia. 58.5mm

 Stator size : 50mm x 8mm

 Case length : 20mm

 Shaft length : 42mm

 Shaft Dia. 4mm

 Weight : 168g

 Wires Length : 10mm

 Mounting Hole : 25mm x 4 holes

 Propeller Mounti ng : Two Holes (12mm spacing)

 Recommended Propeller Size : 15

- 16 inch (Two Holes Mounting)

 Recommended ESC : 40AExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 6

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 2. 5 Tarot 3

- Axis Gimbal for Full Frame Camera (Servo Driven )

2. 6 Video Transmitter Module

 5.8 GHz

 DJI AVL58 FPV System (TX + RX + Antenna / 500mw)

 2

- 3km line

- of

- site range

2. 7 Two Turnigy Nano

- tech 8000mAh 6s 25

- 50c Lipo Battery Pack

 Capacity: 8000mAh

 Voltage: 6S1P / 6 Cell / 22.2V

 Discharge: 25C Constant / 50C Burst

 Weight: 1105g (including wire, plug & case)

 Dimensions: 195x50x55mm

 Balance Plug: JST

- XH

 Discharge Plug: 5mm bullet

- connector

2. 8 Hobbywing FlyFun 40A

- OPTO ESC Speed Controller

 Safety arming feature: Regardless the throttle stick position, the motor will not spin after battery

connected.

 Throttle calibration function : Throttle range can be calibrated to be compatible with different

transmitters. User programmable.

 Multiple program methods supported: transmitter stick, LED Program Card. Very easy to program the ESC at home or at the flying field.

 Compatible with Lipo battery and NiCd/NiMH battery.

 Internal timing can be changed to be suitable for different brushless motors.

 Full protection: Low voltage cutoff protection / Over

- heat protection / Throttle signal loss protection.

 Extreme low resistance PCB is used at the power output section, the whole ESC has super current endurance capability.

 Microprocessor uses separate voltage regulator IC, with good anti

- jamming capability.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 7

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 Specification :

 Output: Continuous 40A, Burst 55A up to 10 seconds.

 Input Voltage: 2

- 6 cells lithiu m battery or 5

- 18 cells NiCd/NiMh battery.

 BEC: NO BEC

 Refresh rate of the throttle signal: 50Hz to 432Hz.

 Max Speed: 210000rpm for 2 Poles BLM, 70000rpm for 6 poles BLM, 35000rpm for 12 poles BLM. (BLM = BrushLess Motor)

 Size: 60mm x 28mm x 12mm.

 Weight: 35.2g

2. 9 External Video Monitor This 7 inches FPV monitors has HDMI and AV, built in 5.8GHz Wireless receiver

Wireless Receiver Channel ( MHz )

CH2 CH3 CH4 CH5 CH6 CH7

5685 5665 5645 5885 5905 5925

5845 5825 5805 5785 5765 5745

5752 5771 5790 5809 5828 5847

5760 5780 5800 5820 5840 5860Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 8

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

### 3.0 PUMA All Environment (AE) sUAS

1. 1 Right Wing

2. 2 Center Wing

3. 3 Stabilator

4. 4 Left Wing

5. 5 Fuselage Assembly

6. 6 Rechargeable Air Vehicle Battery

7. 7 EO/IR/Illuminator Gimbaled Payload

Air Vehicle Characteristics:

 Wingspan: 110 in.

 Length: 56 in.

 Structure: modular, KevlarTM composite

 Weight: (with payload) 12.9 lb.

 Modular Battery Capacity: 3.7 lb.

 Airspeed Range: 20

- 40 knots

 Range, Omni Antenna: 10 km (LOS)*

 Range, Directional: 20 km (LOS)*

 Motor: Direct drive electric

 Nominal Endurance: 120 minutes above 32° F

 60 minutes below 32° F

 Launch: Hand launch or mechanica l launcher

 Landing: Deep

- stall Autoland 1:1 ratio

 Navigation: P(y)

- code GPS/Selective Availability

 Anti

- Spoofing Module (SAASM)

 (WGS84) and electronic compass

 Flight Control: Manual or autonomous

 Strobe: Visible/IRExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 9

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 3.1 Puma AE System Limitations : Character istic

 Launch Altitude Minimum: No restrictions

 Maximum: 10,500 ft. Mean Sea Level (MSL)

 Landing Altitude Minimum: No restrictions

 Maximum: 10,500 ft. MSL

 Flight Altitude Minimum: No restrictions

 Maximum: 10,500 ft. MSL

 Blowing Sand and Dust Maximum: 25 Kts

 Wind Speed Minimum: No restrictions

 Wind Speed Maximum: 25 Kts

 Rain 0.25 in. per hour

 Immersion Up to 2 meters for up to 2 hours inside “dry bag” protective packaging

 Temperature Air Vehicle and Payload:

- 20o

- 120o F

 GCS and UBC: 0o

- 120o F

3.2 Puma AE DDL Frequencies: bandwidth)

 M1 1625

- 1725 003

- 097 101

- 199

 M2 1755

- 1850 003

- 092 101

- 194

 M3 (future) 2200

- 2290 003

- 087 101

- 189

 M4 (future) 2310

- 2390 003

- 077 101

- 179

3.3 Gimbaled I

- Spin Payload

3.4 Ground Control Station (GCS)
The VO controls the Air Vehicle using the GCS. The GCS provides the VO with full control of the Air Vehicle during launch, flight and landing, along with full control of the payload. The GCS allows operations by a standard two

- person crew; however, if operation by a single

- person is requ ired, the GCS allows the VO to control all data and input via a single Hand Control The GCS includes CF

- 19 laptop for mission planning and management through FalconView software, payload automatic tracking through AV Tracker software, still and video stora ge, image processing, video playback and transfer, Electronic Logbook, and system component trackingExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 10

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 3.5 PRE

- FLIGHT CHECK:

1. Start Recorder

2. Set GCS Battery Warning Level

3. AV & GCS channel

– Select

4. GCS transmitter

– On; Select Control

5. GPS

– Locked (4+)

6. Boot altitude (± 50 ft) & Magnetic compass (± 10°)

– Check

7. LOL setting

– Check

8. +, H, E, and L waypoints

– Check

9. MAN flight mode

– Select; Throttle

– Check AV Battery Voltage after 3 seconds > 22.6 V DC

- Verify

10. Check Payload

– Verify; Check IR illuminator

– Che ck (as required) Payload

– Unstow Payload

– Stow if not using the IR illuminator

WARNING : Preflight verification of IR payload laser illuminator function shall be done while aiming the beam straight down onto a non

- reflective, diffusive surface such as dirt or dry grass. Never direct the illuminator upward or at anyone during this check. The illuminator must be in the OFF state at the end of Preflight Check to ensure no risk to the AV launcher. Failure to comply may result in injury to personnel.

11. Forward and back stick

– Check

12. Left and Right stick

– Check

13. Gyros

- Functional & Centered

14. Pitot

– Check

- 5 to 5 m/s (beginning and ending air speed) 15 to 45 m/s (steady, when Pitot is pressed)

15. GCS battery voltage

– Check

16. Autoland

– Select

17. Wing assembly

– Attach

18. 17. Beacons

– Check/Set (as required); Locator

– Check (if equipped)

LAUNCH:

1. Wind direction

- Determine

2. Point AV nose into take

- off direction

3. MAN flight mode

- Select

4. Assume correct stance for launching AV

5. Throttle

– Full (100%)

CAUTION : Wait until motor is at full throttle for three seconds before launching Air Vehicle. Otherwise, crash landing and possible damage to Air Vehicle could result.

CAUTION : In the event of a bad launch, the VO must be prepared to command Autoland immediately to minimize damage to the Air Vehicle.

6. AV

– Launch

7. Joystick inputs

– as necessary 8. Maintain climb direction into wind until approx. 200

- 300ft AGL

LANDING : 1. Laser illuminator

– Off

2. Payload

– Stow

3. AV altitude >100ft AGL

– Verify

4. AV into wind

– Orient

5. Autoland

– Select

6. Continue t o fly AV until touchdown

7. Flight/Mission data

– RecordExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 11

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 POSTFLIGHT

1. (Land): Fuselage

– Retrieve

2. Wing Assembly

– Remove

3. Strobes

– Off as required

4. De

- select Control

5. Battery

– Disconnect

6. Remainder of AV components

– Retrieve

7. AV components

– Inspect

8. Inventory all equipment (prior to departing)

– Complete

POSTFLIGHT (Water) : 1. Fuselage

– Retrieve

2. Excess water

– Drain

3. Wing Assembly

– Remove

4. Throttle

– Check (100% for 10 sec)

5. Payload

– Unstow Payload

– visual check Video

– clear?

6. Payload

– Stow

7. Strobes

– Off as required

8. De

- select Control

9. Battery & Payload

– Remove

10. Air Vehicle

– Rinse (Fresh water)

11. Air Vehicle

– Dry

12. Inspect Water Intrusion Label; Servo, Avionics, and Battery

13. Battery

– Install/Stow

14. Pitot tube and avionics static cup

– Remove & Replace

15. AV components

– Inspect

16. Inventory all equipment (prior to departing)

– CompleteExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 12

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 3.6 Standard PUMA AE Hand controller Screen Display

1. Flight mode

2. Initial startup will show “GPS STARTUP” usually 15 sec. then Time/date group. Also can / will show “SEE DIAG” will flash. You must acknowledge.

3. GPS tracking . Need +4.

- 4 or less indicates loss of GPS. Key means the AV is loaded with crypto. RED key indicates crypto zeroize failure.

4. Box means only monitoring / not in control of the AV.

5. Link status bar. At Loss of link you will see a clock. If the clock is there for 6 sec / end

- route rally

6. Boot altitude MS L or altitude AV is currently at. The sample altitude: 1017 with the arrow is command altitude you want the AV to climb or descend to.

7. Range / distance from the HOME location. Will blink at last know Range when loss of GPS.

8. Bearing / direction from the Hom e location. Will blink at last known bearing when loss of GPS.

9. Indicated LASER is on.

10. Indicates front camera. Under that symbol is a mustache / indicates camera is still stowed.

11. Indicates which Zoom the camera is in. (W, M, N ,U)

12. Joystick inputs

13. Center f ield of view

14. General warning display area. (Mission not set, propulsion fail....)Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 13

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 15. Transmit (TX) status. Indicates if GCS radio transmitter is on or off.

16. Altitude Flight winds. AV needs to fly a full 360 degrees for accurate wind reading.

17. Autoland indicator. Solid AUTOLAND= system initiated. Flashing AUTOLAND= VO initiated.

18. Target bearing. Direction Center field of view from AV.

19. Target Range. Distance in meters from AV to Center field of view.

20. Center field of view coordinates. Will not be displayed if looking at the horizon or if no DTED.

21. Command altitude display. ALT, HOME, LOIT modes= only visible when making altitude changes. ( 20 foot increments)

22. % power display. MAN mode=only visible when making changes to throttle. (from zero...First
bump up of throttle = 25%, after that each bump up or down = 5% change)

23. Flight modes. (MAN, ALT, HOME, LOIT, NAV)

24. Flight time. In minutes since launch. If time equals/exceeds loop cycle time then the time will blink and flight background turns red.

25. GCS battery low warning. Only displayed when below user defined low setting.

26. AV battery voltage. Always displayed but when AV voltage is low a warning will display next to the AV voltage display.

27. Heading. Direction AV nose id pointing. In reference to Magnetic North.

28. Ground speed . Speed of AV over ground in Kts.

29. AV Coordinates. Coordinates will blink if GPS does not have valid fix or if GPS info from AV is not
being updated.Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 14

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 3.7 PUMA AE BatteryExemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page B

- 15

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 3.8 Field Repair Kit (FRK) Each system includes an FRK with items necessary to complete field repair or routine maintenance. Each FRK includes all tools required to complete the operator

- level maintenance described in Section 9 of the operator manual.

3.9 Press Release The following link contains an article announcing that the Federa l Aviation Administration gave approval for energy corporation BP and unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) manufacturer AeroVironment to fly an AeroVironment Puma AE for aerial surveys in Alaska

— the first time the FAA has authorized a commercial UAS operation over land.

FAA Approves First Commercial UAS Flights over Land https://www.faa.gov/news/press_releases/news_story.cfm?newsId=16354Exemption Request Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations Page C

- 1

WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. May 7 , 2015 

## A PPENDIX C: WinTec Operating Instruction for Small Unmanned Aircraft

System Operations and Chief Pilot Qualifications and

Certifications

Enclosures:

WinTec UAV Operating Instructions

WinTec Chief Pilot Qualifications and CertificationsWintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

2 1 April 201 5



### 1 SUAS PROGRAM / Tampa, Florida

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

_____________________________________________________________________________________________ Opr: WinTec Arrowmaker SUAS (Mr. Todd Madison ) Certified by: WinTec Arrowmaker President ( Michael A. Zonfrelli ) Pages: 2 3

_______________________________________ ______________________________________________________

This instruction implements AFI 11

- 502 vol. 1

, Small Unmanned aircraft Training

, vol. 2

, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization/Evaluation Program and vol. 3

, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations

. AFI 11

- 5GP1

- SUAS, vol. 1, Group 1 SUAS Operator Training , vol. 2, Group 1 SUAS Operator Evaluations , and vol. 3, Group 1 SUAS Operator
Procedures

. These Instructions establish policies and procedures f or the management of the

WinTec Arrowmaker

, Inc. SUAS Program. Thi s OI is applicable to all WinTec SUAS personnel. All changes and recommendations will be submitted to the SUAS Program This OI requires the collection and maintenance of information protected by the Privacy Act
of 1974

____________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY OF REVISIONS

This document is substantially revised and must be completely reviewed.

___________________________________________________________________________ _________

1. PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY 3 1.1. SUAS Program Objectives

2. SUAS PROGRAM PERSONNEL (FI RES) ORGANIZATION AND DUTIES 3 2.1. Program Responsibilities

2.2. Duties

3. SUAS PROGRA M INPROCESSING REQUIREMENTS 5

3.1. SUAS Phase Requirements 3.2. Newly Assigned SUAS 3.3. Visiting SUAS

4. SUAS

- I and SUAS

- E UPGRADE P ROCEDURES AND TRAINING PROGRAM 6

4.1. SUAS

- I

4.2. SUAS

- E

4.3. Documentation

5. EVALUATIONS 7
5.1. Evaluatio n Zone Monitoring
5.2. Evaluation Notification

5.3. Ground Phase Evaluation Procedures

5.4. Control Phase Evaluation Profiles

5.5. Control Phase Evaluation Events

5.6. Evaluation Documentation 5.7. Processing and Routing of SUAS Evaluation Form 5.8. Additional Training

5.9. DisqualificationWintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 2 5.10 Debrief

6. NO

- NOTICE / SPOT / SUPPL EMENTAL EVALUATION PROCEDURES 9

6.1. No

- Notice Evaluations 6.2. Spot Evaluati ons

7. GO / NO

- GO PROCEDURES 10

7.1. SUAS Activities

8. TREND ANALYSIS 10 8.1. Ground Phase Trend Identification & Tracking 8.2. Control Phase Trend Identification & Tracking 8.3. Reporting of Trends

8.4. Corrective Actions

8.5 . Discrepancies

9. CREW ENDURANCE 10

10. I NCIDENT AND MISHAP REPORTING 11

A TTACHMENT 1 Individual MQT Grad e Sheet 1 2
ATTACHMENT 2 SUAS

- O Flight Evaluation Grading Criteria 1 4
ATTACHMENT 3 SUAS

- I Fli ght Evaluation Grading Criteria 17
ATTACHMENT 4 Flight Scenarios 18
ATTACHMENT 5 SUAS Crew Member Mission Briefing Checklist 19

ATTACHMENT 6 Operational Risk Management (ORM) 20

ATTACHMENT 7 SUAS Mishap Report Format 21Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

2 1 April 201 5



### 3 1. Purpose and Applicability. This instruction outlines general guidance for the WinTec
Arrowmaker , Inc. SUAS Program . The purpose of this instruction is to detail how the unit manages and executes the SUAS Program. Additionally, this instruction sets policies for the SUAS Program and outli nes standardized procedures for conducting evaluations . Where procedures are adequately outlined in the parent AFIs, they are not repeated, but

r eferenced.

1.1 SUAS Program Objectives. The SUAS Program must ensure that the unit’s SUAS training program sup ports the successful and safe execution of the unit’s multiple designed operation capab ility (DOC) taskings. The WinTec SUAS Program shares the same program objectives listed in AFI 11

- 502 Volumes 1, 2 and 3 and AFI 11

- 5GP1

- SUAS Volumes 1, 2 and 3. The objectives are achieved through following all guidance and governing directives listed in AFI 11

- 502 Volumes 1, 2 and 3

, and AFI 11

- 5GP1

- SUAS Volumes 1, 2 and 3 and this OI. Additionally, WinTec will maintain a good working relationship with Army Research Lab, ARL and Unique Mission Cell, (UMC) and ensure that all training requirements and operational procedures are stan dardized within the unit

.

2. SUAS Program Personnel Organization and Duties. WinTec manning will c onsist of one SUAS Program Manager, two SUAS Evaluators, and two SUAS Instructor s

.

2.1. Program Responsibilities. SUAS Program is the President’s program to assess the

readiness of the SUAS personnel within the company

. Additionally, the program is charged

with providing feedback on processes to the Army Research Lab, ARL and Unique Mission Cell, (UMC) that ensure the readiness of the company to conduct TSOA mission s . These activities include, but are not limited to:

2.1.1

. SUAS Evaluator and SUAS Program Manager:

2.1.1.1. Review SUAS Evaluation form s prior to routing for signatures.

2.1.1.2. Ensure the WinTec SUAS Program is IAW AFIs, supplements and OIs.

2.1.1.3. Provide input to the WinTec President on SUAS Program issues, procedures,

and trends.

2.1.1.4. Conduct SUAS/ SU AS

- E objectivity evaluations of unit SUAS

- Es.

2.1.1.5. Provide input, feedback, and suggest improvements

. 2.1.1.6. Review training records prior to giving an evaluation.

2.1.1.7. Conduct review of all SUAS evaluation folders upon PCS/PCA into the Company

. 2.1.1.8

. Coordinate with Range Officials to schedule /c ancel ranges. 2.1.1.9

. Act as Equipment custodian for all unit SUAS systems and ensure only SUAS qualified personnel are issued equipment.

2.1.1.10

. Capitalize on all opportunities to integrate SUAS tr aining with TSOA trips

. 2.1.1.11

. Maintain the evaluation profile books and their associated scenarios.

2.1.1.12

. Maintain the master question file (MQF) test bank.

2.1.1.13

. Maintain ground and control phase trending information.

2.1.1.14

. Submit ORM and WARNO.

2.1.1.15

. Repair or r eturn damaged parts to the WinTec SUAS equipment custodian.

2.1.1.16 . Ensure that the unit maintains a minimum of two SUAS Instructors and one Evaluator to return any non

- current SUAS

- O's to flying status to meet mission requirements.

2.1.1.17

. Review and be familiar with AFI 11

- 502 vol. 1, Small Unmanned aircraft Training , vol. 2, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization/Evaluation Program and vol. 3, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations , 26 April 2012. AFIWintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 4 1 1

- 5GP1

- SUAS, vol. 1, Group 1 SUAS Operator Training , vol. 2, Group 1 SUAS Operator Evaluations , and vol. 3, Group 1 SUAS Operator Procedures

. 2.1.1.18

. Maintain SUAS currency IAW this policy.

2.1.2. Additional Duty SUAS

- Es:

2.1.2.1. Maintain qualifications as instructors

. 2.1.2.2. Administer evaluations only on the systems they are qualified on

. 2.1.2.3. Conduct a thorough pre

- mission briefing , (attachment 5 and 6), for the examinee and applicable crew members on all aspects of the e valuation. Explain the purpose of the evaluation and how it will be conducted. The examinee will accomplish all mission planning.

2.1.2.4. Conduct a thorough post

- mission debriefing for the examinee and applicable

crew members on all aspects of the evaluat ion. Thoroughly critique all aspects of the flight. During the critique, the SUAS

- E will review the evaluates overall rating, specific deviations, area grades assigned (if other than qualified), and any required additional training. Evaluator judgment will be the determining factor in arriving at the overall grade.

2.1.2.5. Immediately correct breaches of flying safety or flight discipline during an evaluation (this applies to all crew members). If this situation occurs, the SUAS

- E will also debrief unit supervision, and if appropriate, document the deviation on an approved e valuation form

. 2.1.2.6. Immediately notify WinTec Leadership whenever Qualification Level “Q

- 2” or “Q

- 3” performance is observed.

2.1.2.7

. Review and be familiar with AFI 11

- 502 vol. 1, Small Unmanned aircraft Training , vol. 2, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization/Evaluation Program and vol. 3, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations , 26 April 2012. AFI

11

- 5GP1

- SUAS, vol. 1, Group 1 SUAS Operator Training , vol. 2, Group 1 SUAS Operator
Evaluations , and vol. 3, Group 1 SUAS Operator Procedures

. 2.1.2.8. Conduct SUAS evaluations on WinTec personnel.

2.1.2.9. Provide recommendations for improvement to the SUAS Program Manager.

2.1.2.10. Review training records prior to giving an evaluation.

2.1.2.11. Maintain SUAS currency IAW AFI 11

- 50 2 vol. 1, Small Unmanned aircraft Training , vol. 2, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization/Evaluation Program and vol. 3, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations , 26 April 2012. AFI

11

- 5GP1

- SUAS, vol. 1, Group 1 SUAS Operator Training , vol. 2, Group 1 SUAS Operator Evaluations , and vol. 3, Group 1 SUAS Operator Procedures

.

2.1.3. SUAS

- I duties:

2.1.3.1. In

- process and give initial orientation to new operators

. 2.1.3.2. Instruct SUAS procedures to IQT/MQT personnel IAW referenced guidance,

curre nt mission TTPs and approved scenarios.

2.1.3.3. Review and document trainee’s progress and training.

2.1.3.4. Review and be familiar with AFI 11

- 502 vol. 1, Small Unmanned aircraft Training , vol. 2, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization/Evaluation Program and vol. 3, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations , 26 April 2012. AFI

11

- 5GP1

- SUAS, vol. 1, Group 1 SUAS Operator Training , vol. 2, Group 1 SUAS Operator Evaluations , and vol. 3, Group 1 SUAS Operator Procedures

.

2. 1.4. SUAS

- O duties:

2.1.4.1. Update flight log and training using the WinTec Flight Log Database

2.1.4.2. Completely fill out individual UAS system flight logsWintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 5 2.1.4.3. Maintain SUAS currency IAW AFI 11

- 502 vol. 1, Small Unmanned aircraft Training , vol. 2, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization/Evaluation Program and vol. 3, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations , 26 April 2012. AFI

11

- 5GP1

- SUAS, vol. 1, Group 1 SUAS Operator Training , vol. 2, Group 1 SUAS Operator Evaluations , and vol . 3, Group 1 SUAS Operator Procedures

.

2.2. Duties. These additional general duties are assigned to all members of the WinTec SUAS Program:

2.2.1. Daily:

2.2.1.1. Review message traffic to include STIF items and SUAS field bulletins

. 2.2.1.2. Fill out SUAS Evaluation forms as needed.

2.2.1.3. Track routed Evaluation form status.

2.2.1.4. Review Evaluation forms accomplished by SUAS

- Es.

2.2.1.5. Track additional training status.

2.2.2. Weekly:

2.2.2.1. Schedule evaluations and forecast evaluation eligib ility zones.

2.2.3. Monthly:

2.2.3.1. Send Evaluation Zone Notification Letters.

2.2.3.2. Schedule MQF test for SUAS

- O/I/E entering evaluation zone.

2.2.4. Semi

- Annual:

2.2.4.1

. Review self

- inspection checklist.

2.2.4.2

. Review publications library for currency. 2.2.4.3

. Review evaluation profile books and their associated scenarios.

2.2.4.4

. Review local MQT for discrepancies and erroneous questions.

2.2.5. Annual:

2.2.5.1. Conduct annual records review 2.2.5.2. Receive a FAA Class II flight physical.

3. SUAS Program In

- Processing Requirements. All WinTec SUAS Operators must in

process through the SUAS Program section. A SUAS Program representative will brief the

new indivi dual and establish their WinTec SUAS evaluation folder.

3.1. SUAS Phase Requirements :

3.1.1

. Initial Qualification Training (IQT):

3.1.1.1. Create a profile within the WinTec UAV Pilot Flight log database.

3.1.1.2

. Members must read and understand AFI 11

- 502 vol. 1, Small Unmanned aircraft Training , vol. 2, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization/Evaluation Program and vol. 3, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations , 26 April 2012. AFI

11

- 5GP1

- SUAS, vol. 1, Group 1 SUAS Operator Training , vol. 2, Group 1 SUAS Operator Evaluations , and vol. 3, Group 1 SUAS Operato r Procedures.

3.1.1.3

. Complete formal training Course.

3.1.1.4. Only SUAS

- I ’ s designated in writing by the WinTec President are authorized to instruct IQT.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 6 3.1.2 . Mission Qualification training (MQT):

3.1.2.1. Update all Flight Logs and Training Items via the WinTec UAV Pilot Flight log

database

3.1.2.2. Must complete MQT program within 180 days after completion of formal

school.

3.1.2.3. Must complete a minimum of three graded live flights

. Approved simulator may be used to satisfy two of the three sorties required . ( Attachment 1)

3.1.3.4. At a minimum, MQT will meet all objectives outlined on the WinTec approved MQT syllabus and flight scenarios, (A ttachment 4 ).

3.1.3. Continuation Training (CT). For the purpose of currency requirements, “ sortie ”

shall be defined as an event that includes a minimum of 0.3 hours ( 13

- 18min) of actual or simulated flight time

3.1.3.1. CT will be tracked using WinTec UAV Pilot Flight log database

. 3.1.3.2. SUAS

- Os shall complete one flight or simulator sortie every 60 days

. 3.1.3.3. SUAS

- Os shall complete a total of six sorties every 180 days. Approved simulator may be used to satisfy up to five of the six sorties required.

3.1.3.4. SUAS

- O/I/Es shall complete one evaluation every 12 months

. 3.1.3.5. Search for and acquire a target.

3.1.3.6. Provide Recce for friendly movement.

3.1.3.7. Follow a moving target.

3.1.3.8

. Utilize Mobile operations

. 3.1.3.9

. Demonstrate procedure to conduct targeting with SUAS platforms as real

time data

.

3. 1

. 4. Personnel will receive the following prior to an evaluation:

3. 1

. 4. 1. SUAS Program personnel will ensure SUAS folders are complete and updated.

3.1

. 4. 2. Issue MQF study guides prior to ground phase evaluation.

3.1

. 4. 3. An initial evaluation will be scheduled.

3.2 . Newly Assigned SUAS: Personnel will receive the following prior to an evaluation:

3.2

. 1

. Build a WinTec SUAS evaluation folder for member and conduct a records review to ensure compliance with directives and supplements.

3.2.2

. Place WinT ec President designation letter in Part II of SUAS Evaluations Folder

3.2

. 3

. Issue MQF study guides with ample time for individual study prior to ground phase evaluation.

3.2.4

. The following items will be accomplished prior to the SUAS performing unsupervised SUAS duties:

3.2

. 4 .1. The SUAS

- O will be administered the local MQF test and Emergency Procedures (EP) test

. 3.2.4 .2. The SUAS

- O will conduct one SUAS supervised sortie ( documented on WinTec

SUAS Evaluation Form ) placed in part III of evaluation folder

. 3.2.4 .3. A SUAS Evaluation will be completed and signed by the WinTec President prior to the SUAS

- O performing unsupervised SUAS duties and placed in SUAS

evaluation folder.

3.3 . Visiting SUASs: Personnel will acc omplish the following prior to controlling:

3.3 .1. WinTec SUAS Program Manager will inspect visiting SUAS

- O evaluation and training information to verify currencies and qualification.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 7 4. SUAS

- I and SUAS

- E Upgrade Procedures and Training Program. WinTec will nominate highly qualified SUAS

- Os to perform SUAS

- I duties, and highly qualified SUAS

- Is to perform SUAS

- E duties. Nominees will be approved and entered into the SUAS

- E upgrade program by the WinTec President if they meet all the requirements specifi ed in AFI 11

- 502 vol. 1, Small Unmanned aircraft Training , vol. 2, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Standardization/Evaluation Program and vol. 3, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations , 26 April 2012. AFI 11

- 5GP1

- SUAS, vol. 1, Group 1 SUAS Operator Training , vol. 2, Group 1 SUAS Operator Evaluations , and vol. 3, Group 1 SUAS Operator Procedures.

4.1. SUAS

- I. The SUAS

- I trains unit SUAS

- Os IAW the appropriate training / operator

manual. The SUAS

- I must be designated in writing by the WinTec President and be qualified and current in the UAS to be operated.

4.1.1. Upgrade

4.1.1.1. Recommended by SUAS PM and approved in writing by WinTec President.

4.1.1.2

. Demonstrate significant UAS experience and knowledge

4.1.1.3

. Have at least 75 hours of logged flight time as a SUAS

- O

4.1.1.4

. Be current on all SUAS

- O requirements

4.1.1.5

. Successfully complete a SUAS

- I Evaluation

4.1.2. Evaluation

. . Successfully complete an SUAS

- I evaluation every 12 months administered by a SUAS

- E, using the criteria in Attachment 3. SUAS

- Is who receive two unqualified (“U”) ratings will receive an overall rating of unqualified and shall be suspended from SUAS

- I duties. A “U” in area 11, “Integrated safety principles,” will automatically result in an overall r ating of unqualified. A suspended SUAS

- I shall be re

evaluated after completing training in the areas marked “U”, and may be re

- instated upon successful completion of a re

- evaluation.

4.2. SUAS

- E. The SUAS

- E will primarily train and evaluate unit assigne d SUAS

- Os, and

SUAS

- Is. A SUAS

- E has technical supervision of the unit standardization program as specified by the unit commander. The SUAS

- E is the P residents technical advisor on all
levels of SUAS standardization within the command and assists the comma nder to develop, implement, evaluate and manage the unit training program.

4.2.1. Upgrade

4.2.1.1

. Demonstrate significant UAS experience and knowledge

. 4.2.1. 2

. Meet all SUAS

- O / SUAS

- I requirements

. 4.2.1. 3

. Observe an evaluation and conduct an evaluation under the supervision of a qualified SUAS

- E

. 4.2.1. 4

. Recommended by SUAS PM and approved in writing by the WinTec President

.

4.2.2. Evaluation

. . Successfully complete an SUAS

- I evaluation every 12 months administered by a SUAS

- E, using the criteria in Attachment 3. SUAS

- Es who receive two unqualified (“U”) ratings will receive an overall rating of unqualified and shall be suspended from SUAS

- I / SUAS

- E duties. A “U” in area 11, “Integrated safety principles,” will automatically result in an overall rating of unqualified. A suspended

SUAS

- E shall be re

- evaluated after completing training in the areas marked “U”, and may be re

- instated upon successful completion of a re

- evaluation.

4.3. Documentation.

4.3.1. WinTec SUAS Evaluation Form

. SUAS

- E Objectivity will be completed and filed in

the members SUAS evaluation folder (Part IV).Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 8 4.3.2. SUAS

- E will be added to the Designation letter maintained in the members SUAS evaluation folder (P art II) and signed by the WinTec President

.

5. Evaluations. These policies affect the notification, preparation, conduct and

documentation of f ormal field evaluations

.

5.1. Evaluation Zone Monitoring. Evaluation zones will be tracked using WinTec SUAS
database . Each SUAS Pilot is responsible for ensuring that all SUASs have accurate and up

to date flight logs in order to reflect current data. The S UAS

- PM will review the Tracker and monitor the status of SUASs. Status and projected evaluations will be briefed during the weekly operations update. This process will al low WinTec leadership to stay informed and report evaluation status.

5.2. Evaluation Notification. Individuals will be notified of entry into their evaluation

e ligibility window via official e

- mail. Notification is given one month prior to entering the

el igibility period to allow the individual time to ensure training records are current and complete. The letter is forwarded from the SUAS Program section to the member and

WinTec leadership

.

5.2.1. Waiver. SUAS Program office will prepare a memo for record and obtain WinTec
President’s signature if an individual enters the 90

- day waiver period after expiration of his SUAS evaluation window. The memo documenting the 90

- day waiver period will be permanently fi led in members SUAS evaluation folder

5.2.1.5. Individuals participating in real world operations (to include operations other than war, alert, etc.) who are not able to complete the required flight evaluation(s) before or during deployment. This will be on a case

- by

- case basis and is not authority to grant blanket extensions for scheduled operational deployments

.

5.3. Ground Phase Evaluation Procedures.

5.3.1. Open book MQT testing for formal evaluations will be conducted using random questions from the master MQT test bank. Each test utilizes differe nt questions from the master MQT . The SUAS Program section will administer all tests for individuals in their

evaluation zone. The SUAS

- E will visually monitor the examinee during th e ground phase eva luation. SUAS

- Es must ensure that the same test is not administered to an examinee inside of three consecutive testing opportunities.

5.3.2. Ground phase evaluations will be taken in the first month of eligibility, operations tempo perm itting, and will be valid for the entire evaluation window.

5. 3.2

. Test results will be recorded for trend analysis. Failure of the ground phase evaluation will result in awarding the member no higher than a (Q

- 2) on his control phase evaluation SUAS Eval uation form

. A retest will be administered no earlier than 24

hours from the initial test. The failure test results and re

- test results will both be
annotated in the remarks section of the Evaluation form . Failure of both the test and re

test will result i n the member receiving a (Q

- 3).

5.3.4. Emergency P rocedure , (EP) exam is mandatory for all evaluations. These exams require a grade of 100%. The failure of this exam requires that the member be placed on supervised status until a score of 100% is achieved.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 9 5.4. Control Phase Evaluation Profiles. Evaluation profiles wi ll be tailored to the

mission statements supported by the company

.

5.4.1. WinTec SUAS flight Scenarios are listed in attachment 4 of this OI . New scenario recommendations will be approved by the SUAS PM prior to use.

5.5. Control Phase Evaluation Events. WinTec SUAS

- Es will use the Individual Mission Grade sheet (Attachment 1)

.

5.5.1. SUAS evaluations will be conducted IAW Attachments 2 an d 3

. 5.5.1.1. Failure of a SUAS evaluation (Q

- 3). SUASs receiving a re

- evaluation, due to failure of an initial/recurring evaluation, will be evaluated with a different SUAS

- E (operations tempo permitting) using a different evaluation scenario. The SUAS

- E s primary obje ctive is to re

- evaluate the SUAS in the areas and/or sub

- areas that received a "U" during the primary evaluation.

5.6. Evaluation Documentation.

5.6.1. WinTec, Individual Mission Grade Sheet

. All SUAS

- Es will use an Individual Mission Grade Sheet, (Attachment 1) when conducting control phase evaluations. The Grade sheet is designed to be the SUAS

- Es working paper in the field to help ensure that

all SUAS

- Es follow the same guidelines and proced ures. The grade sheet is primarily broken down to mirror grading criteria for a "Q". The sub

- areas are established to aid

the SUAS

- E in evaluating overall performance for that core area. A minimum of one sub

area must be evaluated in order to award an over all grade for the core task area. It is not necessary to evaluate all sub

- areas. The Mission Grade sheet is merely a field tool

and not an authoritative document.

5.6.2. SUAS Evaluation Form

. SUAS

- E s will document all formal evaluations on the

WinTec SUAS

- O Evaluation Form.

5.7. Processing and Routing of SUAS Evaluation Form

. Once the WinTec SUAS

- O Evaluation Form is final with all signatures, it will be e

- mailed to the Program Manager for quality control. The Program Manager will maintain a digital copy. He/she will also print a copy of the WinTec SUAS

- O Evaluation Form, update the WinTec SUAS Evaluation Tracker Form and both will be placed in the individual’s SUAS Evaluation folder, maintained by the

SUAS

- PM.

5.8. Additional Training. When the need for additional training is identified, the SUAS

- E will annotate on the Evaluation form. Once the additional training has been completed, the

WinTec SUAS

- O Evaluation form will be updated with the additional training completion

date and initialed.

5.9. Di squalification. A disqualification, (Non

- CMR), letter from the President will be entered into the individuals training record and the letter will include the reason for disqualification. Reasons an individual may become disqualified include, but are not

limited to:

5.9.1 . Individual did not perform one sortie in the last 60 days.

5.9.2 . Individual did not perform six sorties in the last 180 days.

5.9.3

. Individual did not have three sorties within 180 days of completion of IQT.

5.9.4 . Individual did not receive an evaluation within the last 12 months.

5.9.5 . Individual failed the written test.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 10 5.9.6 . Individual failed the Emergency Procedures test.

5.9.7. Expired FAA second class Physical.

5.9.8 . Other safety of flight violations.

5.10 . Debrief. The SUAS

- E , member and member’s supervisor should debrief President the duty day following an evaluation.

6. No

- Notice/Spot/Supplemental Evaluation Procedures.

6.1. No

- Notice Evaluations. A no

- notice evaluation is one where the examinee is notified of the evaluation at or after the beginning of normal preparation for the mission. The beginning of normal preparation for a mission will be determined by the SUAS

- E, no more than 24 hours prior, and may be further defined in supplements to thi s annex. The intent is to preclude extraordinary preparation for the mission.

6.2. Spot Evaluations. Spot Evaluations will be conducted IAW this policy.

6.2.1. A SPOT evaluation is an evaluation not intended to satisfy the requirements of a periodic evalu ation. An evaluation that begins as a SPOT evaluation may become (and be documented as) a required periodic evaluation if all required flight phase requirements are completed during the SPOT eval and the examinee subsequently completes all ground phase req uirements for the evaluation.

7 . Go/No

- Go Procedures.

7 .1. SUAS A ctivities. Before SUAS operations, deployments or TDYs, SUAS

- O s will verify they are current and qualified on all tasks to be performed unsupervised by ensuring current in WinTec UAV Pilot Flight log database , and ensure a SUAS

- I is

a vailable if necessary.

8 . Trend Analysis.

8 .1. Ground Phase Trend Identification & Tracking. Ground phase evaluation trend data is logged / tracked in the remarks section of the evaluation and Tre nd Tracker on the squadron Share Point

.

8 .2. Control Phase Trend Identification & Tracking. Control phase evaluation trend data is logged / tracked in the remarks section of the evaluation and Tren d Tracker on the

WinTec Share Point

.

8.3. Reporting of Trends. Any ground phase or control phase trends that are identified will be reported to the WinTec President in the next

. The President may establish trends at his discretion based on his assessment of potential impact to the unit’s miss ion.

8 .4. Corrective Actions. The following procedures are designed to be proactive in identifying and correcting developing trends.

8 .4.1. Ground Phase Trends. Once a subject area is identified as a trend for subject knowledge weakness, the SUAS

- PM will notify the President

. The SUAS PM will continue to closely monitor the trend subject area until the trend is positively reversed, at which

time The SUAS PM will consider the trend item corrected.

8 .4.2. Control Phase Trends. Once a control phase are a is identified as a trend,

The SUAS PM will notify the WinTec President. The SUAS PM may conduct spot evaluations to verify existence of the control phase trend item. Once corrective actionsWintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 11 are taken

, The SUAS PM will continue to closely monitor the trend area until the trend is positively reversed. The SUAS PM will conduct spot evaluations, as required, to positively verify that the trend item has been corrected

.

9. CREW ENDURANCE

9.1. SUAS personnel will not c onsume alcohol 12 hrs. prior to conducting UAS missions.

9.2. SUAS personnel shall make every effort to have at least eight hours of crew rest prior to flying a UAS mission.

10. INCIDENT AND MISHAP REPORTING

10.1. Any incident involving loss of a SUAS, catastrophic damage or flight of a SUAS outside of approved airspace, must be reported to the unit PM immediately. IAW this WinTec policy, complete the SUAS Mishap Re port, (Attachment 7 ). Additionally, make every attempt to provide photos of the wreckage and the surrounding area. Safeguard all

video data and turn

- in to PM upon return from training/operational area.

10.2. The PM will notify the President, ARL and UMC

.

10.3

. If there are any questions as to whether a mishap needs to be reported or not, report it.

11. Revision History

Date Revision

Level Description Responsible Person

4

- 2

- 20 13 Draft Initial Creation Todd Madison

5

- 28

- 20 13 New Initial Issuance of Operating Instruction Todd Madison

4

- 12

- 2014 A Annual Review and Update Todd Madison

4

- 21

- 2015 B Annual Review and Update: Added AFI

11

- 5GP1

- SUAS vol 1,2,3 ref. Todd Madison

Michael A. Zonfrelli WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc

PresidentWintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 12 INDIVIDUAL MISSION GRADESHEET

(Grading Criteria on Reverse) RANK / NAME (Last, First, MI) RANGE / LOCATION DATE

MISSION ELEMENTS U

N

K

N

O

W

N D

A

N

G

E

R

O

U

S G

R

A

D

E

0 G

R

A

D

E

1 G

R

A

D

E

2 G

R

A

D

E

3 G

R

A

D

E

4 FILM REVIEWED

1. GENERAL REMARKS ( Continue on Reverse )

* 1.1. Demonstrate Mission Safety.

1.1.1. Display Sound Judgment.

1.1.2. Follow Applicable Directives.

1.1.3. Identify Unsafe Trends that Hinder Mission

Safety.

1.1.4. Demonstrate Situational Awareness.

1.1.5. Demonstrate Knowledge of Duties

1.1.6. Demonstrate Professionalism.

1.1.7. Responsibilities and Roles of the VO and MO.

1.1.8. Ensure Mission Readiness.

1.1.9. Describe Continuation

- Training Requirements.

1.1.10. Identify Applicable Regulations.

1.1.11. Demonstrate Knowledge of Applicable

Regulations.

1.1.12. Describe Local Operating Procedures.

2. PRE

- MISSION PLANNING AND

PROCEDURES.

2.1. Review STIF for Current Information and

Annotate the STIF Card.

* 2.2. Produce Signed WARNO.

2.3. Describe Mission Planning Factors.

2.4. Demonstrate Mission Knowledge.

2.5. Describe Threats to Mission.

2.6. Analyze Mission Tasking.

2.7. Describe an ATO.

2.8. Describe a RAS.

2. 9

. Describe a SPINS Document.

2.10. Describe ROE.

2.11. Describe Targets of Interest.

2.12. Describe Commander's Intent.

2.13. Interpret Imagery.

2. 14

. Plot/Convert Coordinates.

2.1 5

. Perform Mission Planning.

2.15 .1 Set up Falcon View Waypoints 

### ATTACHMENT 1Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 13 2.1 6

. Conduct Mission Briefings.

2. 17

. Accomplish Pre

- Mission Duties.

(Continued on reverse)

OVERALL GRADE SIGNATURE OF INSTRUCTOR STUDENT’S INITIALS SUPERVISOR’S INITIALS

MISSION ELEMENTS U D 0 1 2 3 4 REMARKS ( Continued)

3. AIR VEHICLE SYSTEMS.

3.1. Operate Air vehicle

3.1.1 Assemble all parts

3.1.2 Pre

- flight

3.1.3 Launch

3.1.4 Flight

3.1.5 Land

3.2. Operate GCS

3.2.1. Assemble all parts

3.2.1 Describe controls

3.3. Operate Falcon View w/ RPUAV add on

4. EMERGENCY PROCEDURES

* 4.1. Detect

* 4.2. Diagnose

* 4.3. Corrective Action

* 4.4. Recovery/Continue

5 MISSION EXECUTION

* 5.1. Perform Preflight Checklist.

5.2. Using a Map, Locate a Known Point.

5.3. Demonstrate Use of Military Grid Coordinate

Points During Orientation.

5.4. Manually Identify Reference Points/Targets Prior

to Mission.

5.5. Use Proper Terminology

5.6. Perform Search Procedures

5.6.1. Identify cued target (go to specified area, find

specified target)

5.6.2. Identify un

- cued target (search specified area,

find a target of interest with regard to mission)

5.6.3. Return target coordinates

5.7. Maintain stationary target in field of view

5.8. Maintain moving target in field of view

5.9. Mobile operations

5.9.1. Mobile launch

5.9.2. Maintain situational awareness

5.9.3. Update home waypoint

5.10 Air Vehicle recoveryWintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 14 5.10.1 Heads up

5.10.2 Heads down

5.10.3 Remote

6. POST FLIGHT PROCEDURES

* 6.1. Accomplish Post Flight Checklist

GRADING CRITERIA

UNKNOWN

- Performance was not observed or the element was not performed. * Critical Task: Student meets performance level of Grade 1.

DANGEROUS

- Performance was unsafe (one element marked “Dangerous” will require an overall grade of “Zero”).

GRADE 0

- Performance indicates a lack of ability or knowledge.

GRADE 1

- Performance is safe, but indicates limited proficiency. Makes errors of omission or commission.

GRADE 2

- Performance is ess entially correct. Recognizes and corrects errors.

GRADE 3

- Performance is correct, efficient, skillful and without hesitation.

GRADE 4

- Performance reflects an unusually high degree of ability.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 15 ATTACHMENT 2

SUAS

- O FLIGHT EVALUATION GRADING CRITERIA



### Grading Criteria

Q Q

- U



### Area 1.

General Follow, Identify, and Demonstrate

knowledge of applicable Directives, Regulations, and Local Operating Procedures. Demonstrate knowledge of Duties, Responsibilities, Procedures, professionalism and

situational awareness. Define roles of

VO and MO. Ensure mission readiness. Describe CT requirements. Indentify unsafe trends that hinder

mission safe ty Minor errors of

omission or

commission that

did not detract

from mission

effectiveness.

Need for study in

some areas is

indicated. Major error of

omission/ commission precluded mission accomplishment or unnecessarily endangered personnel or equipment.

Area 1.1 / 1.1.1 Mission Safety /

Sound Judgment ( *CRITICAL ) Employed all available methods to

ensure safety of flight and ground personnel. Analyzed emergency situations and implemented emergency procedures. Used equipment in a safe manner.

Demonstrated Airmanship and Flight Discipline. Performed any dangerous act.

Disregarded safety procedures.

Did not use equipment

in a safe manner.

Did not comply with safety requirements.

Area 2

. Mission Planning Review STIF for Current Information.

Describe Mission planning factors, ATO, RAS, SPINS, ROE, Targets of Interest, and Commanders Intent. Demonstrate Mission Knowledge. Analyze mission Tasking. Interpret imagery and Plot/convert coordinates. Setup Spyglass or Falconview Waypoints and conduct Mission briefings. Analyzed target area for SUAS employment (i.e. suitability, ID, and description). Thorough knowledge of target area and threats. Recognized ground to air

threats to aircraft. Minor errors of

omission or commission that

did not detract

from mission

effectiveness.

Need for study in

some areas is

indicated. Major error of

omission/ commission precluded mission accomplishment or unnecessarily endangered personnel or equipment.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 16 Grading Criteria

Q Q

- U



### Area 2

. 2.

WARNO ( *CRITICAL ) Produce a signed WARNO and ORM Major error of

omission/ commission precluded mission accomplishment or unnecessarily endangered personnel or equipment.

Area 3

. Air Vehicle Systems All equipment necessary for mission

accomplishment properly prepared and inspected. Unsatisfactory items identified and appropriate corrective

actions taken. Assemble all parts, conduct preflight, launch, fly and Land UAS. Operate the GCS and describe the controls. Operate Spyglass or Falconview w/ RPUAV

add

- on Min or errors of

omission or

commission that

did not preclude

mission

a ccomplishment.

Need for study in

some areas is

indicated. Major error of omission

or commission precluded mission accomplishment or unnecessarily endangered personnel or equipment.

Area 4. Emergency

Procedures ( *CRITICAL ) Detect, Diagnose, conduct corrective

actions and Recover/continue during emergency procedures. Did not adequately Detect, Diagnose or provide corrective actions to prescribed emergency procedures.

Area 5.

Normal Operations, procedures /

checklists Using a map: locate a known point,

demonstrate use of MGRS, and identify reference points/targets prior

to mission. Use proper terminology, perform search procedures, identify cued (known tgt

. ) and un

- cued (search area

a nd find a tgt

. ) targets, return target coordinates, maintain stationary and moving targets in center FOV. Conduct mobile operations (Mobile launch / maintain SA) and recover A/V (Heads up/down/remote) Minor errors of

omission or

commission that

did not pre clude

mission

a ccomplishment.

Need for study in

some areas is

indicated. Major error of omission

or commission precluded mission accomplishment or unnecessarily endangered personnel or equipment.

Area 5.

Pre

- flight checklist ( *CRITICAL ) Successfully conducted radio

communication checks, properly performed system assembly. Thorough knowledge of battery installation and payload operation. Safely conducted SUAS preflight

checks using checklist Major errors that precluded preflight accomplishment or

unne cessarily endangered personnel or equipment.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

21 April 201 5



### 17 Grading Criteria

Q Q

- U



### Area 6

. Post Flight

Procedures Conducted thorough post flight

debrief with all crew member and/or

Mission Commander Minor errors during post flight

debrief with all

crew member

and/or Mission

Commander. Failure to conduct post

flight debrief with all

crew member and/or

Mission Commander

Area 6

. 1 / 6.3 Post Flight

Procedures ( *CRITICAL ) Successful recovery of UA. Checked

and annotated any SUAS damage. Conducted post flight storage/packing of all equipment. Properly documented operator and SUAS log

books. Major operator errors in successful recovery of

UA. Did NOT check

and annotate SUAS damage. Failure to properly documented operator and SUAS log

books. Failure to conduct proper post flight storage/packing of all equipment.

Area Procedures Complied with all area procedures,

range/MOA safety requirements and

restrictions.

Ensured crew briefed on applicable

restrictions. Complied with

all area procedures.

Limited knowledge of

range requirements.

Ensured crew

briefed on applicable

restrictions. Violated range

procedures. Was not knowledgeable of range requirements. Gave incomplete restrictions

to crew that caused a safety violation.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

2 1 April 201 5



### 18 A TTACHMENT 3

SUAS

- I FLIGHT GRADING CRITERIA

Evaluated Task Evaluation Rating

Satisfactory (Q) Unsatisfactory (U)

1. 

### Equipment required is ready for use. Required equipment was immediately available and set up for use. Required equipment was not available or not in working

condition.

2. 

### Stated lesson overview

and included a clear statement of objectives. Clear step

- by

- step overview of lesson objectives clearly understood by student. Objectives of the lesson not stated and no overview given.

3. 

### Used appropriate techniques (examples, scenarios) to assist and

motivate student. Assured student understood

material and related material to actual job performance. Did not use appropriate techniques

to assist and motivate student.

4. 

### Used training aids effectively. Training aids and devices used

in a manner that enhances the training outcome. Training aids did not enhance training or not used effectively.

5. 

### Verbalized clearly, easily heard, and used correct grammar & terminology. All technical terms clearly pronounced and vocal quality conveyed ent husiasm. Mispronounced technical terms

which detracted from the lesson.

6. 

### Administered student

measurement appropriately. All procedures for administering measurement devices were followed exactly. Measurement device administered improperly.

7. 

### Demonstrated knowledge of subject matter/procedures. Demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject

matter and used examples to clarify problem areas. Instructor did not fully understand the subject matter.

8. 

### Managed time

e ffectively/completed all phases of lesson and reviewed main points. All objectives covered in detail

with no time wasted. All objectives not covered and

time wasted.

9. 

### Clearly identified procedure vs. technique. Thoroughly explained instructions as procedures and

technical methods as techniques. Did not clearly identify procedures vs. techniques.

10. 

### Ensured equipment was properly configured and addressed problems appropriately. Ensured equipment available for use had all safety devices

in proper working order. Did not ens ure proper equipment configuration, did not address problems.

11. 

### Integrated safety principles into lesson and applied safety precautions at all times. Ensured students complied with personnel and equipment safety procedures. Did not integrate general safety procedures into lesson.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

2 1 April 201 5



### 19 

## ATTACHMENT 4

SUAS FLIGHT SCENARIOS

Scenario 1 An object will be placed, such as a VS

- 17 panel, thermal panel or vehicle beyond the line of sight of the launch point. Provide the SUAS

- O with coordinates of the object or area boundaries.

The SUAS

- O will Input the coordinates into SUFOS toolbar, fly A/V to the specified location/Area, identify and describe the object. Return A/V and land within clo se proximity (25 yards ) of Landing spot.

Scenario 2 Select a building, st ructure, compound or identifiable feature on a map located beyond line of sight of the launch point. The SUAS

- O will be given the coordinates, to input them into the

SUFOS toolbar and wil l fly the A/V to the feature. SUAS

- O will pay special attention to th e surroundings and provide detailed information of the site. SUAS

- O will take photos, pass coordinates, distances and sizes of/between buildings vehicles and personnel utilizing the range and bearing tool. Return A/V and land within close proximity (25 yar ds ) of Landing spot.

Scenario 3 A vehicle will be staged beyond the line of sight of the launch point. Provide the SUAS

- O with

coordinates of the vehicle. The SUAS

- O will fly the A/V to the coordinates, identify and describe the ground vehicle. The ground vehicle will begin moving and the SUAS

- O will track/follow, take photos of the ground vehicle and any pertinent objects. When the ground vehicle stops, the SUAS

- O will provide the coordinates of the ground vehicle. Return A/V and

land within close proxim ity (25 yards ) of landing spot. Review and edit the video so it may be provided to higher commands for Intel dissection.

Scenario 4 At the launch point, the SUAS

- O is set up for mobile operations. Using mobile operations TTPs, fly the A/V and take photos as needed, provide Intel of possible threats to the driver in enough time for the driver to plan/react if he needs to deviate to the route. The Vehicle will arrive at its destination; the SUAS

- O will dismount and without delay, land the A/V within close pr oximity (25 yards ) of the landing spot. Review and edit the video so it may be provided to higher

commands for Intel dissection.Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

2 1 April 201 5



### 20 ATTACHMENT 5

SUAS Crew Member Mission Briefing Checklist

1. Mission Overview

2. Weather

3. Flight route

4. Airspace surveillance procedure

a. Identification of airspace intended for use by operator

b. NOTAMS

– notice to airman. Alerts to any hazards en

- route and specific information

a. Airspace surveillance procedures

5. Required items, mission equipment, and personnel

6. Crew actions, duties and responsibilities

a. Modes of flight, who will make radio calls, identification of recovery team, etc.

b. Emergency actions

1. Mission considerations

2. Egress procedures

3. Actions to be performed by VO / MO

7. General crew duties

a. Vehicle operator (VO)

1) Fly the air vehicle

2) Avoid traffic and obstacles

3) Cross check display symbology, messages, wind velocity / direction

b. Mission Operator (MO)

- (if used)

1) Assist in traffic and obstacle avoidance

2) Manage radios

3) Navigate

4) Copy clearances , direction from ACA

5) Cross check display symbol ogy, messages, wind velocity / direction

6) Read and complete checklist items as required

7) Set / adjust pages / switches and systems as required

8) When on approach, watch for air vehicle

8. Operational Risk Management Assessment (ORM)

a. 5 steps to develop and impleme nt ORM
1) Identify hazards

2) Assess the hazards

3) Make risk decision

4) Implement controls

5) Supervise and watch for change

9. Mission commander, crew member questions, comments, and acknowledge of the mission

briefingWintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

2 1 April 201 5



### 21 ATTACHMENT 6


## OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT

PLANNER:

MISSION/TASK: UAV FLIGHT DATE

MISSION STEPS POTENTIAL HAZARDS RISKS

LEVEL CONTROLS RESIDUAL

RISK LEVEL

Planning Missed a planning step L Review Air letter and Range Request Documents, Utilized checklists, Warnord, SUAS CONOPS , Check local weather

forecast L

Transport to flying location Vehicle accident M Driver trained, cautious, obey all traffic laws , and provide enough time to safely arrive. L

Pre

- flight SUAS ; launch Propeller injury M SUAS

- I/E supervision; use checklist for proper safety procedures L

During flight SUAS loss

- of

- link; off

reservation flight M Situational Awareness and constantly reviewing Range/bearing of Aircraft. Falcon Tracker attached to SUAV; proper/confirmed waypoint, home, and rally point programming M

During flight WX conditions L Observe/plan/react to observed weather conditions. Fly clear of clouds, cease operations if high winds, heavy precipitation, or lightning is within vicinity of air operations. L

During flight Crash into trees or property M SUAS

- I/E supervision; waypoints and flight pattern . Remain

inside McKenna Air Box and remain 500 meters north of green Route

. De

- conflict with radio towers identified on CF

19. (remain above tree top heights) L

During recovery Uncontrolled / crash landing M SUAS

- I/E supervision; Re

- check wind direction, select clear landing site

, fly planned landing approach azimuth L

Circle

Overall Rating APPROVED BY:__________________________________

Low (L) Medium (M) High (H) Extremely High (EH) Date:

PAGE : 1 OF: 1Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

2 1 April 201 5



### 22 ATTACHMENT 7

SUAS MISHAP REPORT FORMAT

SUAS MISHAP REPORT FORMAT This report will be completed whenever there is an incident that involves the loss of a SUAS, damage that renders the

SUAS non

- repairable/non

- recoverable, or an injury incurred as a result of SUAS operation. All units operating SUAS will develop local repo rting procedures and notification matrices. A copy of this report will be forwarded to WinTec

Arrowmaker President and ARL/UMC within 24 hours of a reportable mishap

. Use standard security markings and classified handling procedures for classified reports.

1. Owning Unit:

2. Date of loss: (local/Zulu)

3. Type of system:

4. Recovered: (Recovered/not Recovered)

5. Site/location of incident: Range MSL altitude of GCU

6. Map sheet reference number: Series Sheet#

7. UA (or lost/destroyed item) fuselage number:

8. Flight log information:

Unit:

Channel: GPS Keyed:

Launch Time:

Land/Crash Time: Duration of Flight:

Weather Conditions: Temperature: Win d Speed: Knots/gusts

Wind Direction: Lighting:

GCU#

RVT# UA Battery Type: Camera Type:

Other Factors: Moonlight/illumination: Precipitation:

Clouds:

9. Crew Information:

SUAS

- O (Name, Rank, SSN):

Date/location of SUAS

- O completion of certified training: Mission Controller (Name, Rank, SSN):

Date and location of MC completion of certified training:Wintec Arrowmaker Operating Instruction 11

- 502 Small Unmanned Aircraft System Operations

2 1 April 201 5



### 23 10. Circumstances: Origin/launch site:

Mission:

Launch Problem: Landing Problem: Problem during flight: Flight mode at time of loss:

NOTE: M=Manual, A=Autopilot, H=Hover, L=Loiter, N=Night

Commanded altitude or throttle setting: Air vehicle altitude above ground (AGL): Air vehicle heading:

Last known UA location: Rally point location and altitude:

Loss

- Of

- Link indications: GPS startup problems: Previous problems/maintenance issues that may have contributed:

11. Fligh t recorded/taped? Y/N Location of tapes on tough book

12. Summary of mishap and damage:

13. Actions taken upon/after loss (search pattern used, number of searchers, duration of search, use of aircraft to assist, etc.):

14. Damage

Aircraft: DOD property damage:

Pri vate property damage:

15. Injuries Name of injured person: Status/extent of injuries: Actions at time of Injury:

______________________________________________________________________________

16. Witnesses: (Name, Rank, SSN, and Role (i.e., RVT Data Capture, SUAS Team Leader, etc.):

17. This report completed by:

Name/Rank: Unit/Office Symbol: Duty Phone:

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison)

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison

Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

# Master Trainer Certificate

Todd Madison

having successfully completed Puma AE and Raven DDL academic instruction and flight qualification requirements for 

# Master Trainer

On this 23rd day of July, 2014

Samu el A. Baucham

Master Trainer

BOSH Global Services. 

# Is awarded to

__________________________________ Jack Wallin SUAS Training and Fielding Lead Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Project Office

. 

### WinTec Arrowmaker, Inc. - Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation RegulationsWinTec Arrowmaker, Inc.- Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) MadisonExemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation RegulationsWinTec Arrowmaker, Inc.- Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) MadisonExemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation RegulationsChief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison- Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) MadisonWinTec Arrowmaker, Inc.- Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison)Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations- Chief Pilot Joseph T (Todd) Madison)