alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. EL15-53-000]

                    On March 16, 2015, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. EL15-53-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation to determine the justness and reasonableness of the Energy Imbalance Market provisions in the California Independent System Operator Corporation's existing tariff related to the imbalance energy price spikes in PacifiCorp's balancing authority areas.                     *California Independent System Operator Corporation,*                     150 FERC ¶ 61,191 (2015).                

                    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL15-53-000, established pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be 90 days from the date of publication of this notice in the                     **Federal Register.**

Dated: March 17, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-06630 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
_ .. • 

HERBERT FLESCH 

Pii-ma 

AOllE CODE Comp&DJ San FN.ncisco, USA 

}11 California Street 

Dear Sire: 

REF ID:A71098 

(20&) Hannover, 27 September 1947 

Yorckatrasse 17 

Germ&DJ 

Br1t1ah Zone 

Through an order of Allied Militar1 Government for 

Germ&nJ 7our "ACllE COMMODITY AND PHRASE CODE" is authorized 

tor use in telegraphic commun1cationa between German1 and 

foreign countries. The number of copies ot this code available in Germany 1• exceptiona.117 low. 

The KOSSE-Code rormerl7 uaed in German7 bad in addition 

to a German edition also Spanish and English editions. Because 

ot this it was poas1ble'that a fir~ in the U.S. trade could 

prepare • telegram trom the English edition and that the 

recipient in Germa117 with the aid ot his German edition or the 

code could decipher the message in German. The answering telegram could be prepared bJ the German firm using the German 

edition or the code and the U.S. recipient could read the text 

from his English edition, aimilarl7 in English. 

Example: 

A tirm 1n the US telegraphs trom the Bngliah edition 

of the Acme Code: 05722 atlka Hov much can 7ou bu7 

The German recipient reads in hie German edition aa 

tollova: 05722 atlka W1ev1el kBJUlen Sie J:auten 

I take for granted that 1t is ver7 desirable to put on the market 

a German edition ot 7our code in Germ&nJ, Austria, and Switzerland. I amlvillinglJ prepared to assist 7ou in the preparation 

ot this German translation. This German edition muat be in tvo 

,parts: 

The first part presenting the five tisure numbers and 

code words in the aame alpbabetical-num•rical sequence as in 

your original code; this edition is used by the decoder. 

1 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
.. • • REF ID:A71098 • 

The second part presents the words according to the 

keJ vord of the sentence or phrase 1n German alphabetical order. Thie part serves the encoder. In the event that 7ou 

are 1ntereated in J117 proposition I will be pleased to await 

7our anaver. 

The copy ot the ACME Code that I poeaeaa ia the edition 

"second printing September 1942". ·As I do not have the 

"Supplement Volume" or your code I vould appreciate receiving 

a copy tor carr11ng out the proposal. 

Most respectt~ll7, 

Yours ver7 sincerely, 

/s/ Herbert Flesch
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 04, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 04, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0244. KENNETH BERNARD GUNN v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration 

of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals 

Rule 13.

On September 30, 2016, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than October 11, 2016. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 4, 2013

d0225 

# Order

March 4, 2013

145791(25)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145791

COA: 309424

Berrien CC: 99

- 402804

- FC

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN FRANKLIN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s November

20, 2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order

was entered erroneously.

V IVIANO , J., not participating.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1573

BRANDON WATSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CITY OF ABERDEEN; ABERDEEN POLICE DEPARTMENT; PFC. RAUL 

FOSMARK; DETECTIVE JOHN DIVEL; CPL. CRAIG GENTILE; HARRY 

FREDRICK BUDNICK; OFFICER THADDEUS TOMLINSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. 

(1:15-cv-00307-JKB)

Submitted: November 18, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jay Fred Cohen, LAW OFFICES OF JAY FRED COHEN, Baltimore, 

Maryland, for Appellant. Daniel Karp, KARPINSKI, COLARESI & 

KARP, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brandon Watson appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Watson v. Aberdeen, No. 1:15-cv-00307-JKB (D. Md. Apr. 25, 

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2015177EN.01000401.xml

| 30.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 177/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 177/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 May 2015

(2015/C 177/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0970 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4597 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71900 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3272 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0341 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,401 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,90 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1298 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4425 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9188 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4338 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3650 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5052 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5405 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4799 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 220,31 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,3409 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7994 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5720 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 512,24 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0195 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 48,949 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 57,4638 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,007 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4522 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8433 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,9893 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0970

JPY

Japanese yen

135,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4597

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71900

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3272

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0341

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,401

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,90

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1298

RON

Romanian leu

4,4425

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9188

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4338

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3650

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5052

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5405

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4799

KRW

South Korean won

1 220,31

ZAR

South African rand

13,3409

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7994

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5720

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 512,24

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0195

PHP

Philippine peso

48,949

RUB

Russian rouble

57,4638

THB

Thai baht

37,007

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4522

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8433

INR

Indian rupee

69,9893

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT MICHAEL RAY CURTIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D19-1477 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed November 13, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for DeSoto County; Don T. Hall, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 775.084(1)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); Tillman v. State, 609 So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 1992); Ross v. State, 601 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1992); Hall v. State, 821 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 898 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); Davis v. State, 880 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
#### Gillett vs. The Wisconsin Cooperage Company.

*Exceptions.*

An exception “to the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth findings of fact” (being all there were), as “contrary to the evidence, and not supported thereby,” *held*equivalent merely to'a general exception, and, where one or more of the findings were obviously correct, insufficient to require a review of the evidence.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Wvnnebago*County.

Defendant appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Por the appellant, briefs were filed by *James Freemcm*and *Q. W. Washburn,*and the cause was argued orally by *Mr. Washburn.*

The cause was submitted for the respondent on the brief of *Ceo. W. Burnell.*

Cole, J.

This cause was tried by the circuit court, a jury being waived. The court made and filed six distinct findings of fact, and three conclusions of law. The exception to these findings was as follows: the defendant “excepts to the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth findings of fact found by the court on the trial of said cause, for the reason that said findings are contrary to the evidence given on the trial of said cause, and are not supported thereby. And the defendant excepts to the first, second and third conclusions of law found by *464the court on the trial of said cause, for'the reason that the same are erroneous and contrary to law.”

This exception is insufficient to raise any question upon the evidence, unless all the findings are erroneous. It must be treated or considered as equivalent only to a general exception to the findings, which will be disregarded where any finding is correct. This is the established rule as to an exception “ to each and every part of a charge,” which is unavailing where parts of the charge are correct. *University of Notre Dame v. Shanks,*40 Wis., *352; Hall v. City of Fond du Lac,*42 id., 281. The same rule, we think, should be applied to an exception in the above form to the findings of fact. It goes for nothing unless all the findings are erroneous. Now in this case some of the findings are beyond all question correct. That is true of the fourth finding, for instance. So, under the circumstances, without reviewing the evidence, for want of sufficient exception, we affirm the judgment.

*By the Court.*— It is so ordered.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
      As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of our report included in this Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K into the Company's
previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-3 (File No.'s 333-86358,
333-48492, 333-95311, 333-54562, 333-65428 & 333-73504) and Form S-8 (File No.'s
333-88928, 333-88930, 333-88932, 333-16299, 333-49939 & 333-49965).

                                             /s/ Virchow, Krause & Company, LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 14, 2003
### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 13

- 00899

- CR

ANTONIO BRAVO , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

Appeal from the 183rd District Court of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. 1375810 ).

TO THE 183RD DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS :

Before this Court , on the 23rd day of October 2014 , the case upon appeal to revise

or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these words:

This case is an appeal from the final judgment signed by

the trial court on October 16, 2013. After submitting the case

on the appellate record and the arguments properly raised by

the parties, the Court holds that the trial court’s judgment

conta ins no reversible error. Accordingly, the Court affirms

the trial court’s judgment.

The Court orders that this decision be certified below

for observance.Judgment rendered October 23, 2014

.

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Sharp. Opinion

delivered by Justice Higley.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in

this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

May 22, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

                  We have issued our report dated January 31, 2003 (except for
Note 17 to the financial statements, as to which the date is March 21, 2003),
accompanying the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report
of Famous Dave's of America, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 29,
2002. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Famous Dave's of America, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File
No.'s 333-86358, 333-48492, 333-95311, 333-54562, 333-65428 & 333-73504) and
Forms S-8 (File No.'s 333-88928, 333-88930, 333-88932, 333-16299, 333-49939 &
333-49965).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 28, 2003
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of HanKersen International
Corp. (f/k/a Kushi Natural Foods Corp.) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending
September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Yi Tang, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


March 8, 2006

By:  /S/ YI TONG
    ---------------------------------------------
    Yi Tong, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2015212EN.01000201.xml

| 27.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 212/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 212/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 June 2015

(2015/C 212/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1202 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,58 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71230 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2641 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0447 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7730 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,230 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,66 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1757 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4575 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9848 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4631 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3851 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6842 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6347 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5100 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 258,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,6412 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9553 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5875 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 925,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2416 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,510 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,8070 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,868 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,5157 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4219 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,2458 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1202

JPY

Japanese yen

138,58

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71230

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2641

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0447

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7730

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,230

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,66

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1757

RON

Romanian leu

4,4575

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9848

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4631

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3851

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6842

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6347

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5100

KRW

South Korean won

1 258,49

ZAR

South African rand

13,6412

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9553

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5875

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 925,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2416

PHP

Philippine peso

50,510

RUB

Russian rouble

61,8070

THB

Thai baht

37,868

BRL

Brazilian real

3,5157

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4219

INR

Indian rupee

71,2458

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           6,015
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,364
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     27,542
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,297
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         92,090
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,112
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,434
<DEPOSITS>                                     120,485
<SHORT-TERM>                                       352
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,122
<LONG-TERM>                                         43
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,722
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,710
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  14,432
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,689
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,964
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,653
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,359
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,359
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,294
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      380
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (2)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,191
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,347
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,347
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,534
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.57
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.72
<LOANS-NON>                                        190
<LOANS-PAST>                                        88
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   866
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      161
<RECOVERIES>                                        27
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,112
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,112


</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131714 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

ROCHELLE GILL, Persona Robert P. Young, Jr. l Representative of Stephen J. Markman, the Estate of JOHN GILL, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 131714 

 COA: 267078 

Kalamazoo CC: 04-000597-NO 

CITY OF KALAMAZOO,

Defendant, 

and 

STACEY GEIK, 

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk