alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 30, 2016

s1121

Order 

Clerk

November 30, 2016

153016

HARTLAND GLEN DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 153016

COA: 321347

Tax Tribunal: 00-423343;

TOWNSHIP OF HARTLAND, 00-427021

Respondent-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**CERTIFICATION      OF **

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER **

**PURSUANT      TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (i) | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company, for the fiscal quarter                ended September 30, 2006, and to which this certification is attached                as                Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as                amended;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |            |                                     |
|--------|-----------------|------------------------------------------|
|   |                 |
|        | By:   | */s/                  Rajesh Raniga*     |
|   |  Name:     | Rajesh                  Raniga           |
|   | Title:          | Chief                  Financial Officer |
|   | Date:           | November                  20, 2006       |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained      by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its      staff upon request.*

*This      certification accompanies the Form 10-QSB to which it relates, is not deemed      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated      by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933      or      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date      of      the Form 10-QSB), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained      in such filing.*

----
NUMBER 13-16-00214-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

TODD JANES, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 319th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER 

Before Justices Garza, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

Currently pending before the Court is appellant's motion for pro se access to the 

appellate record and motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief. Appellant's 

counsel has filed an Anders brief herein and appellant has been unable to examine the 

record so that he can file a pro se brief. 
2

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial court ensure that appellant has 

the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before December 16, 2016, 

and it is FURTHER ORDERED that the trial court notify this Court as to the date upon 

which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 

S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a pro se brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record was first made 

available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days

thereafter to file its response, if any.

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed 

the 29th day of November, 2016.
# Providing an Order of Succession Within the Council on Environmental Quality

# Memorandum for the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality

                    By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, 5 U.S.C. 3345*et seq.*                     (the “Act”), it is hereby ordered that:                

**Section 1.***Order of Succession.*                     Subject to the provisions of section 2 of this memorandum and to the limitations set forth in the Act, the following officials of the Council on Environmental Quality, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the office of the Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality (Chairman), during any period in which the Chairman has died, resigned, or is otherwise unable to perform the functions and duties of that office:                

(a) Managing Director;

(b) Chief of Staff;

(c) General Counsel; and

(d) Associate Directors in the order in which they have been appointed as such.

**Sec. 2.***Exceptions.*                     (a) No individual who is serving in an office listed in section 1 of this memorandum in an acting capacity, by virtue of so serving, shall act as Chairman pursuant to this memorandum.                

(b) No individual listed in section 1 of this memorandum shall act as Chairman unless that individual is otherwise eligible to so serve under the Act.

(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of this memorandum, the President retains discretion, to the extent permitted by law, to depart from this memorandum in designating an acting Chairman.

**Sec. 3.***Revocation.*                     The Presidential Memorandum of September 18, 2008 (Designation of Officers of the Council on Environmental Quality to Act as Chairman of the Council on Environmental Quality), is hereby revoked.                

**Sec. 4.***General Provisions.*                     (a) Nothing in this memorandum shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:                

(i) the authority granted by law to an agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

                    (c) You are hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the                     *Federal Register.*

[FR Doc. 2015-06383

Billing code 3125-WO
# CA2016091EN.01000101.xml

| 8.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 91/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 91/1

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION EPSO/AST-SC/04/15

PARLIAMENTARY USHERS (AST SC 1)

(2016/C 091 A/01)

| ANDREOU | Paraskevi |
| --- | --- |
| ASSUMMA | Stefania |
| CROSETTO | Marco |
| DEBOWSKI | Piotr |
| EVANGELISTA | Gladys |
| EZAN | Marianne |
| FACCIOLI LOPES | Tiago |
| FEDERICO | David |
| GAIDARJI | Aura |
| GARCIA GONZALEZ | Carlos |
| GIRGINOV | Kiril |
| GOMEZ MARTIN | Jorge |
| HERTZ-FARAGÓ | Hajnalka |
| KALITA-SUSKA | Sylwia |
| KUBINOVA ZIKOVA | Dagmar |
| MAZÁN | Ilona |
| ONISZK | Katarzyna |
| PACITTI | Florencia |
| PAUSESCU | Alexandru |
| POIRIER | Virginie |
| POLIUCHOVIC | Jaroslava |
| REIMERS | Alexander René |
| SAMUEL | Alexia |
| SAVICKAS | Domas |
| SOKOLOWSKA-LIKENG | Monika Iwona |
| STOYANOVA | Elmira |
| ŠVEHLOVÁ | Eva |
| TUTS | Sebastien |

ANDREOU

Paraskevi

ASSUMMA

Stefania

CROSETTO

Marco

DEBOWSKI

Piotr

EVANGELISTA

Gladys

EZAN

Marianne

FACCIOLI LOPES

Tiago

FEDERICO

David

GAIDARJI

Aura

GARCIA GONZALEZ

Carlos

GIRGINOV

Kiril

GOMEZ MARTIN

Jorge

HERTZ-FARAGÓ

Hajnalka

KALITA-SUSKA

Sylwia

KUBINOVA ZIKOVA

Dagmar

MAZÁN

Ilona

ONISZK

Katarzyna

PACITTI

Florencia

PAUSESCU

Alexandru

POIRIER

Virginie

POLIUCHOVIC

Jaroslava

REIMERS

Alexander René

SAMUEL

Alexia

SAVICKAS

Domas

SOKOLOWSKA-LIKENG

Monika Iwona

STOYANOVA

Elmira

ŠVEHLOVÁ

Eva

TUTS

Sebastien

The reserve list will be valid until 30 June 2019.

30 June 2019

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Charles H. Thoms, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

October 8, 1937.

*399
      *Edmund M. Beecroft,*for the administratrix, etc,, petitioner.

Foley, S.

In this discovery proceeding the administratrix seeks to compel the respondent the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company to deliver to her a policy of insurance, or its proceeds, issued by it upon the life of the decedent. Upon the return of the discovery order a representative of the insurance company appeared, was sworn and testified. From his testimony it appears that the policy was an industrial insurance policy and contained the usual *“*facility of payment ” clause, and that on or about January 15, 1937, payment was made by the company to one Caroline Davidson upon the surrender by her of the policy and upon her sworn statement that she was the widow of the decedent and had paid the premiums. The administratrix claims that she is the lawful widow of the decedent.

Although it appears that payment might have been made to the wrong person, this court is without jurisdiction to direct delivery of the policy, or its proceeds, to the administratrix. The purpose of a discovery proceeding is to bring the decedent’s assets within the control of the representative of the estate, where such assets are in the possession of and withheld by a respondent. Undoubtedly jurisdiction exists where the fund is in the possession of the insurance company, and the only dispute is between the estate and a rival claimant to the fund. In such case the insurance company usually appears in the discovery proceeding and, by an answer in the nature of an interpleader, submits the determination of the question to the court, and abides by its decision. Circuity of action is thereby avoided. Numerous decisions uphold the jurisdiction of this court in such proceeding. The situation is different in the pending proceeding. No assets of the estate are now in the control of the insurance company. The proceeds - of the policy were paid by the respondent to a third party under a claim of title by her. Similar claim of title is asserted by the administratrix. The obligation of the respondent here arose by virtue of a contract entered into between it and the decedent. It was a contractual obligation. Whether or not the insurance *400company has properly made payment of the proceeds of the policy under its contract with the decedent or otherwise breached the contract are matters which this court is without power to determine in a discovery proceeding. While the jurisdiction of this court to entertain discovery proceedings has been considerably broadened, sections 205 and 206 of the Surrogate’s Court Act still do not vest in the Surrogate’s Court jurisdiction to compel the payment of common debts or to enforce contract obligations. *(Matter of Thomas,*235 App. Div. 450; *Matter of Campbell,*145 Misc. 389; *Matter of Sichel,*164 id. 2.) Such obligations must be enforced in a common-law court. The petitioner will, accordingly, be relegated to an action at law against the respondent in an appropriate forum.

Proceed accordingly.
# C_2015207EN.01000302.xml

| 24.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7558 — DS Smith/Duropack)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 207/03)

On 21 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7558. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7558. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 In
connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Famous Daves of America, Inc (the Registrant) on Form
10-K/A for the annual period ended January 2, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Goronkin, Chief Executive Officer of the
Registrant, certify, in accordance with Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Report, to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1, fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. Dated: June 29, 2005
    By:
    /s/ David GoronkinDavid GoronkinPresident, Chief Executive Officer, and Director
# C_2014431EN.01000403.xml

| 1.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 431/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/4

---

Appointment of the First Advocate General

(2014/C 431/08)

At its General Meeting on 7 October 2014, the Court of Justice appointed Mr Wathelet as First Advocate General for the period from 7 October 2014 to 6 October 2015.

---
Exhibit 10.3


 


TERMINATION AGREEMENT


 


This Termination Agreement
is dated October 4, 2021 (the “Termination Agreement”), by and between Alberton Acquisition Corporation, a British Virgin
Islands exempted company (the "Company”) and Quest Mark No. 9 L.P. (“Buyer”).


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Buyer are party to a Backstop Agreement dated as of August 11, 2021 (the “Backstop Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, the Backstop
Agreement contemplated that Buyer would purchase no less than $5 million of the ordinary shares of the Company;


 


WHEREAS, as of the date of
this Termination Agreement, Buyer has not purchased any ordinary shares of the Company pursuant to the Backstop Agreement;


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish
to terminate the existing Backstop Agreement;


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration
of the foregoing and the mutual covenants and other promises contained in this Termination Agreement, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Buyer agree as follows:


 


Section 1. Termination.


 


The Company and Buyer hereby
agree that the Backstop Agreement will terminate effective as of the date of this Termination Agreement and shall be of no further force
or effect.


 


Section 2. No Termination
Fee.


 


The Company and Buyer hereby
agree that there is no termination fee, penalties or any financial obligation on either party in connection with the termination.


 


Section 3. Mutual
Release.


 


Each party, on behalf of itself
and its respective affiliates, agents, parents, subsidiaries, successors and assigns, hereby releases the other party and its affiliates,
agents, parents, subsidiaries, successors and assigns from any and all claims, obligations and liabilities arising from or relating to
the Backstop Agreement, which agreement and any continuing obligations thereunder are hereby terminated and of no further force and effect.


 


Section 4. Governing
Law.


 


This Termination Agreement shall be governed by
and construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.


 






    1


    	 



    

 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
parties have duly executed this Termination Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


		ALBERTON ACQUISITION I LIMITED  
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Guan Wang
	 	Name:	 Guan Wang
	 	Title:	Chief Executive Officer
	 
	 	QUEST MARK NO.9 L.P.
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/ Martin Franco Cho Tin
	 	Name:	Martin Franco Cho Tin
	 	Title:	 Chief Executive Officer 
		Address:	 19800 MacArthur Blvd, Suite 361, Irvine, CA 92612



 


 


2
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15605]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06675]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a 
Savings and Loan Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and the Board's Regulation LL (12 CFR 
part 238) to acquire shares of a savings and loan holding company. The 
factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in 
paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 8, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacquelyn K. Brunmeier, 
Assistant Vice President) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. J. Scott Nelson, Redwood Falls Minnesota, individually and James 
Tersteeg, and Thomas Stotesbery, all as a trustees of the HomeTown Bank 
Employee Stock Ownership Plan, Redwood Falls Minnesota; J. Scott Nelson 
and John Nelson, Redwood Falls, Minnesota; Sarah Hoyt, St Paul 
Minnesota, all as members of the Nelson family shareholder group acting 
in concert, to acquire and retain voting shares Redwood Financial, 
Inc., Redwood Falls, Minnesota, and thereby indirectly acquire and 
retain voting shares of HomeTown Bank, Redwood Falls, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 19, 
2015.
Margaret McCloskey Shanks,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-06675 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
# C_2015271EN.01000701.xml

| 18.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 271/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 271/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 August 2015

(2015/C 271/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1100 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4633 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4450 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0841 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1585 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,021 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,01 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1708 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4300 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1725 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5096 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4581 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6077 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6927 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5644 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 316,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,3340 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0983 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5566 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 393,34 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5530 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,403 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 72,6325 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,264 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8851 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,2900 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,4997 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1100

JPY

Japanese yen

138,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4633

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71050

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4450

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0841

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1585

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,021

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,01

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1708

RON

Romanian leu

4,4300

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1725

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5096

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4581

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6077

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6927

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5644

KRW

South Korean won

1 316,04

ZAR

South African rand

14,3340

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0983

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5566

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 393,34

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5530

PHP

Philippine peso

51,403

RUB

Russian rouble

72,6325

THB

Thai baht

39,264

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8851

MXN

Mexican peso

18,2900

INR

Indian rupee

72,4997

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---