alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 6874

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. BRAHEEN TIMOTHY EARL WHITFIELD, a/k/a Braheem, a/k/a Anthony Braswell , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. R. Bryan Harwell, Chief District Judge. ( 4:05

- cr - 01216

- RBH

- 2; 4:16

- cv - 02000

- RBH )

Submitted : November 21, 2019 Decided: November 26, 2019

Before KEENAN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Braheen Timothy Earl Whitfield, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Braheen Whitfield seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The o rder is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U. S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Whitfield has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Whitfield’s moti on for a certificate of appealability , deny Whitfield’s motion to appoint counsel, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument woul d not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
# CA2014242EN.01000801.xml

| 25.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 242/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 242/8

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 242 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

---
Statement of the Air and Radiation Management Administration 

Department of the Environment 

for the Public Hearing 

Relating to Proposed Amendments to COMAR 26.11.01.01 and COMAR 26.11.06.14 

Concerning Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Requirements 

held on May 28, 2009 

Baltimore, MD 

My name is Carl York. I am the Special Projects Manager for the Regulation 

Development Division of the Air and Radiation Management Administration, Department of the 

Environment. 

This public hearing is being held pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR Section 51.102 

and Sections 2-301 et. seq. of the Environment Article, Annotated Code of Maryland. It is also 

being held in conformance with the State Administrative Procedures Act under the State 

Government Article, beginning at Section 10-101. 

Notice of this hearing appeared in the: 

Maryland Register on April 24, 2009; 

MDE's website from April 21, 2009 to May 28, 2009; 

Baltimore Sun on April 24, 2009; 

Saint Mary's Enterprise on April 24, 2009; 

Cumberland Times-News on April 24, 2009; 

Frederick News-Post on April 24, 2009: 

Salisbury Daily Times on April 24, 2009; and the 

Washington Post on April 23, 2009. 

Copies of these notices were submitted for the record. 

Copies of this proposed action and supporting documents were made available for review 

by the State Clearinghouse and are also submitted at this time into the hearing record. Copies 

were also made available for public inspection at the Air and Radiation Management 

Administration offices in Baltimore, Cumberland, and Salisbury, and at all local health 

departments or local air quality control offices. 

The purpose of today's hearing is to give the public an opportunity to comment on 

proposed amendments to COMAR 26.11.01.01 and COMAR 26.11.06.14 concerning Prevention 

of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements. 

Summary 

 The purpose of this action is to update Maryland's adoption of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency (EPA) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements found 

under 40 CFR Part 52.21 to include the changes in the July 1, 2008 edition of the Code of 

Federal Regulations (CFR). 

1 
2 

This action also clarifies the meaning of the terms “Administrator” and “Reviewing Authority” 

as used in 40 CFR Parts 52.21 and 52.1116. 

Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP)

These amendments will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a 

revision to Maryland’s State Implementation Plan. 

Consideration of Comments 

The Department will consider all comments before making a decision to adopt these 

amendments. 

L:\AQPlanning and Monitoring\Regulation Development Division\Hearing Materials & Notification\Hearing 

Statements\Hearing Stmt - 2009 PSD update.doc
# C_2014340EN.01000101.xml

| 30.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 340/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 340/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7391 — HUAYU Automotive Systems/KSPG/KS AluTech JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 340/01

On 23 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7391. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7391. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
\ 

REF. :rD: ~. _.._ ~ _Sca-.-

6 

· v~ / /-:' 

/f/y-. CY-osKL''J 

co M /.5 Cd'-'f.Sn:tl4",t'd 

(ca~,s-~~J r-~parTs- 71~ 

1 ..., 7Z1 ~ se::; u., e ~kt} or ..!:J 

Yl~AY4 Tc· C 0 ...._, f'Y"l.St!.S 

o J' Co ,t.11 'u T 1 #-J lo Y ""-'A/, a....,_ r~ s u / .;1,,_,, j /;() ,_,_,._ · 

Jo(..( ..s f-5 I "f tt>o '-"rt,, u 1.t I e:-a~"-.r St!' cu YI ·0 j :;rlt4 ;?" 

~ev..t a.II"~ 1--10T AS L.uAl--l::J. s~.t:-A bv.s-/:;- 1v? 

COM j 71-l'a;T ,..., 71'~ #u~w..sT Y't'fJOYT 7lre'::J 

wt rt! /,,~~~ /w1c If!.. ;' /7!1tt2T, ;~~A e.tse o J 

711 e prox11A .. q f:J o I COM J. c,, v-v~~I, ve. e:t .. .,e:;( 

J ,,,, v t s-f, ~ ~ -f'. tJ~ itt'U Al} 1;t.S a~"' .1.ii Kt!' 1 rc.I pt.-/~ 

a' ( d h~;ut'- ,..,t(j Je..t fo V&.&.lA !J; 7f14T; Wh/t&.f 

~ ~oss1hh c.JitAA.j'Y{)CAAISt!! 1.S ~St!"O(./ev~d, 

a..cf1ou. ~s '/;,.¥~,., T1u.sT ?"he re..rpous-16k 

pa. r-i1 f .s' I.$ ~~ .Se:i ~'"'" .1;1. "-"" t~H It' Y A S J t.i /h~ 

J;~1J 1

• 7l.t~r ,A)sA /)e".IOt-1'-lt'/ eo,,~~r"'"v-1 

.t? r ~ su~ 4cr ~ '7J, t' __ .:s"'a u..,~ 

r~por-f1 ~ s'M1-1~A~..5 a< .:$~7 •• 

71ui. I' ,;<... ,/;u .rls- ,, ),4 v~ r~"tt "'r1J ~J:f~ y Cl. /ff/.-(~ /Jt' Vt/) A u;,, 7tt "- (/1-f~ • 

• 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352a 

•
Order entered March 23, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00199
- CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V. JUANITA JERNIGAN, Appellee On Appeal from the County Cr iminal Court of Appeals No. 2

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. M B 18
- 54318
- M

O RDER Before the Court is the State’s March 10, 2020 motion to abate the appeal for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion asserts, and the clerk’s record on file a t the Court confirms, that the State filed a February 14 , 20 20 request for findings of fact and conclusions of law after the trial court granted Juanita Jernigan ’ s motion to suppress. We GRANT the State’s March 10, 2020 motion.
We ORDER the Honor able Pamela Luther , Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court of Appeals No

. 2 , Dallas County, to issue, on or before APRIL2 0 , 20 20 , findings of fact and conclusions of law. See State v. Elias , 339 S.W.3d

667, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); State v. Cullen , 19 5 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). If necessary, the judge may review the reporter’s record of the testimony upon which the original ruling was made to refresh her recollection of the reasons behind such ruling. See Wicker v. State , 740 S.W.2d 779 , 784 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987).
We ORDER Dallas County Clerk John Warren to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and conclusions on or before APRIL 23, 2020.
We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order t o the Honorab le Pamela Luther , Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court of Appeals No.
2 , Dallas County ; Dallas County Clerk John Warren ; and counsel for the parties.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply with this order. It shall be reinstated when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed

or when the C o urt deems it appropriate to do so.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unigene Laboratories, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the “Report”), I, Warren P. Levy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)        the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)        the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                                                         |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ WARREN P. LEVY                                      |   |   |        |
|                                                              |   |   |   |
| **Warren P. Levy****Chief Executive Officer**August 14, 2003 |   |   |   |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit23.1**

 

Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

Edge Petroleum Corporation

Houston, Texas

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-125677) and FormS-8 (No. 333-113619, No. 333-106484, No. 333-61890, No. 333-93209, and No.333-22571) of Edge Petroleum Corporation (the “Company”)of our reports datedMarch 10, 2006, relating to the consolidated financial statements and to theeffectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, whichappear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

 
| /s/ BDO  SEIDMAN, LLP |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
| Houston,  Texas       |
|                  |
| March 14,  2006       |

 

----
# C_2015385EN.01000201.xml

| 19.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 385/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 385/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 November 2015

(2015/C 385/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0666 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70090 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3019 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0838 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2335 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,029 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,94 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2540 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4467 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0550 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5028 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4223 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2669 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6505 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5185 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 247,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,1537 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8054 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6215 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 746,47 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6594 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,341 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,3696 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,392 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0563 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8707 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,6304 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0666

JPY

Japanese yen

131,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70090

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3019

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0838

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2335

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,029

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,94

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2540

RON

Romanian leu

4,4467

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0550

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5028

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4223

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2669

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6505

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5185

KRW

South Korean won

1 247,90

ZAR

South African rand

15,1537

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8054

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6215

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 746,47

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6594

PHP

Philippine peso

50,341

RUB

Russian rouble

69,3696

THB

Thai baht

38,392

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0563

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8707

INR

Indian rupee

70,6304

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22
- 1028

KIMBERLY MALLETT , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DISNEY ENTERPRISES , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Rossie David Alston, Jr. , District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00616

- RDA

- JFA )

Submitted : April 14, 2022 Decided: April 19, 2022

Before DIAZ and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Kimberly Mallett, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-1028 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Kimberly Mallett appeals the district court’s order striking her amended complaint. * On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir.
R. 34(b). Because Mallett ’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, she has forfeited appellate review of the district court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey , 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document ; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Mallett v. Disney Ent ers
. , No. 1:21

- cv - 00616

- RDA

- JFA (E.D. Va

. Dec. 21, 2021). We deny Malle t t’s motions to
appo int counsel and for discovery

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

* To the extent Mallett seeks to appeal the district court’s November 24, 2021, order dismissing her original complaint , the notice of appeal was untimely filed , and we therefore dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. See Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007) (“ [ T ] he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.”). USCA4 Appeal: 22-1028 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/19/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
# C_2014186EN.01000302.xml

| 18.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7240 — Klépierre/ING/Le Havre Vauban et Le Havre Lafayette)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 186/03

On 5 June 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7240. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7240. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015282EN.01000101.xml

| 27.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 282/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 282/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 August 2015

(2015/C 282/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1402 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4637 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73140 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,6557 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0778 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5020 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,085 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 315,54 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2310 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4353 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3370 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5963 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5125 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8383 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7558 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6006 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 353,57 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,8996 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,3079 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5620 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 085,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8413 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,208 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 79,3846 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,671 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0954 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,3982 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 75,4750 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1402

JPY

Japanese yen

136,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4637

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73140

SEK

Swedish krona

9,6557

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0778

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5020

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,085

HUF

Hungarian forint

315,54

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2310

RON

Romanian leu

4,4353

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3370

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5963

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5125

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8383

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7558

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6006

KRW

South Korean won

1 353,57

ZAR

South African rand

14,8996

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,3079

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5620

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 085,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8413

PHP

Philippine peso

53,208

RUB

Russian rouble

79,3846

THB

Thai baht

40,671

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0954

MXN

Mexican peso

19,3982

INR

Indian rupee

75,4750

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015051EN.01000602.xml

| 13.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7415 — Värde/Banco Popular/E-COM)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 51/06)

On 10 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7415. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7415. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---