alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014414EN.01000101.xml

| 20.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 November 2014

2014/C 414/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2535 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4439 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79965 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2598 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2014 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4930 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,683 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2184 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4389 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8001 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4512 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4226 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,7213 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5949 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6347 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 391,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8612 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6710 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6775 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 241,84 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2119 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,652 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 58,8432 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,136 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2431 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0288 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,7095 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2535

JPY

Japanese yen

147,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4439

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79965

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2598

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2014

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4930

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,683

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2184

RON

Romanian leu

4,4389

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8001

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4512

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4226

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,7213

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5949

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6347

KRW

South Korean won

1 391,24

ZAR

South African rand

13,8612

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6710

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6775

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 241,84

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2119

PHP

Philippine peso

56,652

RUB

Russian rouble

58,8432

THB

Thai baht

41,136

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2431

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0288

INR

Indian rupee

77,7095

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### State ex rel. Dickinson vs. Brunner.

*Complaint*— Action *to try title to office.*

In an action to try title to a public office, it is sufficient if the complaint alleges that the relator, at the general election held, on &c., in the several towns and election districts of a certain named county, “was duly elected and chosen by the legal and qualified voters of said county,” to said office; and the whole number of votes given at such election for that office, with the number given for each candidate, need not be stated.

Cole, J.

This is a suit instituted to try title to a public office. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the relator, at the general election held on the 8th of November, 1864, in the several towns and election districts of Lafayette county, was *63duly elected and cbosen by tlie legal and qualified electors of said county to tbe office of clerk of tbe board of supervisors, &c. Tbe complaint is demurred to on tbe ground tbat it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, but states conclusions of law merely. Tbe cause bas been submitted without argument, and without briefs on either side. Tbe particular objection taken to tbe complaint we suppose to be, tbat it does not state bow many votes were given at tbe election for tbe office of clerk of tbe board of supervisors, and tbe number given for each candidate, so as to show tbat tbe relator received tbe greatest number and was entitled to tbe office. We are inclined to bold tbe complaint sufficient. *Attorney General ex rel. v. Barstow,*4 Wis., 568; 2 Kernan, 434.

*By the Court-*— Tbe demurrer is overruled, with leave for tbe respondent to answer in twenty days.
# C_2014244EN.01000601.xml

| 26.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 244/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 July 2014

2014/C 244/05

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3440 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4568 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79115 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1661 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2152 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3395 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,482 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,06 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1435 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3973 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8145 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4289 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4472 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4160 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5728 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6682 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 380,11 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1489 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3272 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 561,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2655 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,199 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,1871 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,780 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9968 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4162 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,7677 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3440

JPY

Japanese yen

136,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4568

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79115

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1661

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2152

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3395

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,482

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,06

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1435

RON

Romanian leu

4,3973

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8145

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4289

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4472

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4160

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5728

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6682

KRW

South Korean won

1 380,11

ZAR

South African rand

14,1489

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3272

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 561,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2655

PHP

Philippine peso

58,199

RUB

Russian rouble

47,1871

THB

Thai baht

42,780

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9968

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4162

INR

Indian rupee

80,7677

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.1

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition of the Company as of September 30, 2008 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended September 30, 2008.



/s/ Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board of DirectorsDated: November 7, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Global Matrechs, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Michael Sheppard, Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, to my best knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.
1350, adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


                                       /s/ Michael Sheppard
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Michael Sheppard
                                       Chief Executive Officer and acting Chief
                                       Financial Officer

         Dated: May 11, 2005

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
REF ID:A57332 

MEMO ROUTING SLIP----,-- --~RUSE FOR APPROVALS, DISAPPROVALS, 

~NCURRENCES. OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

1 tlAME OR TITLE 

2 

3 

4 

FROM NAME OR TITLE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATIO 

roved or release b NS on 05-19-2014 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE ANO RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 
REF ID:A57332~., •• );o ~!Qt.t::'" 

TOP SECRET . ~~~ 

El!<J?ANOU'Jl tOib Chief ot statt, AP'SA 

8UBJECT1 lecmrit.7 c4 JJ'SA COON'!' Conmunioationa 

Referenceau (a) lilm:2o from AFSA-OOB to AFS.A-oo.A, 14 April 19.50. on 

•ame aubject, with Conment No. l, APBA-OOA to AFSA-04, 

' ·Jill¥ 1950J and Comment No, 2, 1'81-04 to AFSA.-OOA. 

(b) lreino .tram AFS.A.-ol,. to AFSA--02_. 'lbru: AFSA-OOA an1 

AFSA-OOB, 2.3 May- 1950_. on ea.me subject, with Cor.inent 

lo. 2 1 AFBA-<JJ. to AFSA.-o/+1 2 June 1950, and Cmment 

No. 3 trom. AFS.l--OOB to AFSA--04, 'lhru1 AFSA-OOA, 

1 June 1950. 

(o) Hemo tram Teohnical Director. AFSA--02 to AFSA-OOB, 

tubject: Cryptosecurity o! I.FSA COl3Jl1JJ'lieatione, 

17 April 1951. 

(4) llemo troni AFSA.-OOB to AFSA-Cl2, 20 April 1951, co.menting on reference ( c). 

(e) Memo f'rom il'SA-OOX to AFSA-ooB, 26 .\Pl'il 19511 am 

Iran AFSA-1' to .A1'8A-OOB, 14 liq 1951, commenting on 

reference (c). 

(f) 8unr.lary- Report on Secur1t7 or .A.FSA Cor:nunieatioruJ_. 

25 April 1951, prepared in APSA-41 .. 

l. The reterencea are cited not onl7 becauee ot their direct bearing on the subject but al.ao because the number or them. indicates that 

the aubject has been one ot tJ:)t18 concern tor eane t.1.!!le. 

2. $0 tar e.a I am 11.frs:re an1 eo tar aa can be seen from the 

l"eterences, very rn constructive atepe have been taken thua fer to 

eorrect a aituationwhich appears to be quite dqeroWJ to the eecurit7 

ot OU!' C<Jl!NT eoureas. Even it minor violations at COllSF.C that are diecovered 1n the ueu.e.1 surveillance e:x.ercieed 't:w" Al'SA-U are corrected on 

a continuing ba•h, unlesa the baeio problem.a involved in bapro~ 

ue ld.udied and answers obtained to them, our COllSEC situation will. 

Jll"Obabl.7 continue to be detective. To have this eort ot a. eituation 

exist at the fountain head ~ CO~EC 'tdthin and tar all the Armed l"c:roes 

90ems to me to call tor pranpt attention &rd action, s1nee the example 

Ht. b7' APSA would hardl.7 be a eal.utory one tor the Services. 

'. Inrormation e.M eonnente trom A'FSA...()4 on thie eubjeet would be 

helptul. 

TOP SECRET .... , ..
# C_2014447EN.01000201.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7425 — Robert Bosch/BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 447/03)

On 3 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7425. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7425. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
\ 

.. . .... - ·- SECURITY CATIOK Ufm>ll) . -

DISPOSITION FORM . __ ... ':"' - .... ,.. ---·iir. .. _ --·-· ..:. .. ....._.... ___ ..... _ ... _ ... 

FILE NO. 

TD FRQM C 8 COMMENT NO. 1 

., -

Dlri•f.CIDa-8114 OttS.ae• 

~ 

1. It bu ... to 111J atteDUan tbai; --•~Sias artio1&1.a are not Rd~ 

vith tba p:orialalla ot mA Rag11lat1Gll l0•30, ap!alfteall,r lD tbe 

8'11m1.aatao or reqgena ftJr Wlmtl arda9 OD COD8ultmf;a1 lxp!r'8 m4 A4v181X"8e 

JD aeecnmee ntaa Seatlm u, ,.....,aa 2(t) or mA Bep.latlC!D 10-30, lt ~· 

tbe 1"8llJIC119Ud.ll• ot .. Cblef, mA1lC '° lal:Clate tbe nqaeat hr D9088Rl.7 

aatl• - the 98A ~ (JWrel. 1iO eft'ect le•-- of ~ tl'aftl 

oriar8 11114 at&t.boftsa\lon tor ~ a.- ID llau_ qr auba!neape. 

2. n la lmperat1Ye tba1; anl• 11e tuea to iDa1R'e ttat pnvlalom ot 

mA Regulatlcm 10-30 'be obaenl4 ID •OUl"lag ~·--~CU(ranc:~·l.Zll-ultana 1 1---'ll 

aa4 A4VS.IOl'8. . 

_ ... 

L. •· ncm 

Rear Admlral, u. a. 11a7 

Cid.el' ot _ ~ -

----- ------ ___ ._ __ ·-·--- -·---- -- .. --·-: ---~---::-·~--:---:-·--:-:-:---::----:.--:-·_--=7~- . ---- ...... 

-:·· ------"":'-·:· -, 

'· \ .. -- ,• ... 

'\ 

\ 

. .. . . - -

-- .. - - --- _.. ___ - . -

- . - • : • • : i:' ,,;. ... . ..:•~ ·- - .. ::.--.. -

--··-·· .. ..:·. --

\- _ @'pprov~d for Release by N:SA on' o3-2B-2014 p'~rs-uant to E.O. 1352e. -_ ---- - - - - - -

I o· o i11i11"' 96- REPLACE!INMIFORM•.1acr&WHICH~A'!!IE~,:f;,.""-"",, __ ,.,~ ... ~,_.~~F~""'"~v-Ji\? • • IFl!B!ID • · -""""''~ _ _,,_ ___ ~ .. -~--1).-~ ... fl--.· --,,,_.p.r.,.,ffii -ov; ;it • • " ~~!-' ·- · f . ~ • ·:> :.'"''": ~-'". ~ .. f' "'~-·,lo.:'!"!. --; ... tl:1!..h,~ ... _ .. ~~-~ "'--"! .... 4).."".~:!2~...!"!a ---'".r-. - ....... --.- -"C. 

I. '• • ' "•: ~.' ., • :la ·-'· "11'"111.~:. ~ .. -. •. I., ..... """ ,,.. ... - __ .;. 

•I • "• •
<PAGE>   1


                                  EXHIBIT 99.3

                               ARTICLES OF MERGER

                                       OF

                                JumboSports Inc.

                                      AND

                   Sports & Recreation Reincorporation, Inc.


To the Secretary of State
State of Florida



     Pursuant to the provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act, the
Florida wholly owned subsidiary business corporation and the foreign parent
business corporation named below do hereby adopt the following Articles of
Merger.

     1. Annexed hereto and made a part hereof is the Plan and Agreement of
Merger, as amended, for merging JumboSports Inc. ("Sports") (formerly known as
Sports & Recreation, Inc. but which has adopted the new name pursuant to
another merger of even date herewith with a wholly owned Delaware subsidiary
known as Sports & Recreation Macro Sports, Inc.) into Sports & Recreation
Reincorporation, Inc. (the "Company") as approved by the Shareholders of Sports
on June 12, 1996.

     2. The effective time and date of the merger herein provided for in the
State of Florida shall be the date and time when these Articles of Merger shall
be filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Florida.

     3. Approval of the Plan and Agreement of Merger by the Shareholders of the
Company was not required because the Company was a wholly owned subsidiary of
Sports.

     4. The merger of Sports with and into the Company is permitted by the laws
of Delaware, its jurisdiction of organization, and is in compliance with said
laws.  The Plan and Agreement of Merger was adopted by the Board of Directors
of Sports on April 5, 1996 and was amended by the Board of Sports on December
18, 1996.

     5. As to the Company, the aforesaid Plan of Merger was adopted in
accordance with the provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act on April
23, 1996 and amended on December 13, 1996.

     6. The Company will be the Surviving Corporation in the Merger and from
and after the effective time of the Merger will change its name to JumboSports
Inc.




                                      E-23
#### Lutz, Respondent, vs. Compton, Appellant.

*September 27*

*October 14, 1890.*

*(1) Vendor and purchaser of land: Inability to convey: Recovery of money paid: Tender of deed after action brought. (2) Evidence: Unrecorded plat.*

*1.*The vendor of land who had not the title thereto at the time specified in the contract for the conveyance, cannot defeat a recovery of the money paid on the contract by procuring title and tendering a conveyance after the commencement of the action.

2. An unrecorded plat of additions to a city may be admissible in evidence to prove the location and identity of a lot described in a contract for the sale thereof by reference to such plat

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Wood*County.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

*IT. W.*Remmgton, for the appellant.

*Geo. L. WilUams,*for the respondent.

Op.toN, J.

This action is brought to recover the consideration money in part paid on a contract between -the parties for the purchase of a lot in Neeves’ first and second additions to the city of Grand Rapids, by the plaintiff of the. defendant, on the grounds (1) that the defendant falsely represented that he owned the whole lot; and (2) that the defendant was unable to convey to the plaintiff said lot. The court ordered the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff, presumably on both grounds. It was proved on the trial that the defendant had sold, before the contract was made, a strip off of said lot, of twenty by forty feet, and after the suit was commenced the defendant procured the title to said twenty by forty feet, and tendered a deed thereof to the plaintiff. That of bourse was too late to remedy the defect, for the plaintiff was entitled to a perfect deed of the whole lot when it was due according to the *585contract, 'and tbe case must be tried on conditions existing at tbe time of tbe commencement of tbe suit. Tbe defendant attempted to show title in bimself of tbe whole lot, by certain tax deeds, but tbe description of tbe property in all of them was so uncertain and imperfect that it was impossible to locate 'it. Tbe plaintiff introduced tbe plat of said additions, which bad not been recorded. It was objected to by tbe defendant, but received in evidence. Tbe error, if any, was cured by the defendant afterwards making use of tbe same plat, but it was admissible in evidence to prove tbe location and identity ,of tbe property. *Vilas v.*Reynolds, 6 Wis. 214; *Simmons v.*Johnson, 14 Wis. 523. Tbe court properly directed a verdict for tbe plaintiff, at least on tbe second ground, and that was sufficient.

*By the*Court.— Tbe judgment of tbe circuit court is affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 64 (Wednesday, April 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 20094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07694]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 18 April 2013, at 10:00 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street 
NW., Washington, DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing CFAStaff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: March 28, 2013 in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-07694 Filed 4-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6331-01-M
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GUSTAVO BERMUDEZ-BARAJAS,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-71921

Agency No. A099-628-622

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Gustavo Bermudez-Barajas, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order denying his motion

to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

NOV 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Singh v. Holder,

771 F.3d 647, 650 (9th Cir. 2014). We grant the petition for review and remand.

Bermudez-Barajas moved to reopen so that he could pursue an I-601A

provisional waiver of inadmissibility pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 212.7(e). At that time,

an individual who had been in removal proceedings was eligible for the waiver

only if the agency had administratively closed proceedings, instead of entering a

removal order. See 8 C.F.R. § 212.7(e)(4) (2013).

The BIA correctly noted that Bermudez-Barajas’ final order of removal

rendered him ineligible for the waiver. However, the BIA abused its discretion in

denying Bermudez-Barajas’ motion to reopen because it appears not to have

considered whether he was entitled to reopening as a matter of discretion. See 8

C.F.R. § 1003.2(a); Singh, 771 F.3d at 653 (the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen

on jurisdictional grounds was legal error, and thus an abuse of discretion, because

it had authority to reopen under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a)). We therefore grant the

petition and remand for further proceedings.

In light of this disposition, we do not reach Bermudez-Barajas’ remaining

contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.

2 14-71921