alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016108EN.01000201.xml

| 23.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 108/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 108/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 March 2016

(2016/C 108/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1212 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 125,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4541 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78790 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2315 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0887 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4470 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,037 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,60 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2612 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4703 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2260 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4751 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4679 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6942 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6626 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5260 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 302,05 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,1950 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2791 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5380 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 772,93 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4882 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,922 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,2330 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,164 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0526 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,5680 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,7605 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1212

JPY

Japanese yen

125,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4541

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78790

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2315

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0887

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4470

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,037

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,60

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2612

RON

Romanian leu

4,4703

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2260

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4751

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4679

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6942

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6626

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5260

KRW

South Korean won

1 302,05

ZAR

South African rand

17,1950

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2791

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5380

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 772,93

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4882

PHP

Philippine peso

51,922

RUB

Russian rouble

76,2330

THB

Thai baht

39,164

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0526

MXN

Mexican peso

19,5680

INR

Indian rupee

74,7605

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014347EN.01000501.xml

| 3.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 October 2014

(2014/C 347/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2631 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4439 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0894 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2085 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1475 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,495 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,71 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1761 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4109 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8749 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4393 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4067 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8052 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6051 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6081 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,70 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1616 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7557 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6396 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 347,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1080 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,654 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 50,0340 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,976 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1273 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9540 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,0804 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2631

JPY

Japanese yen

137,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4439

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78240

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0894

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2085

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1475

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,495

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,71

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1761

RON

Romanian leu

4,4109

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8749

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4393

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4067

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8052

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6051

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6081

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,70

ZAR

South African rand

14,1616

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7557

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6396

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 347,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1080

PHP

Philippine peso

56,654

RUB

Russian rouble

50,0340

THB

Thai baht

40,976

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1273

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9540

INR

Indian rupee

78,0804

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### In the Matter of Leon France, Petitioner, v Charles J. Hynes, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 309]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to prevent further proceedings under Kings County Indictment No. 1526/00, and application for poor person relief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the petition and the application, and the papers filed in opposition thereto, it is,

Ordered that the application is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court—in cases where judicial authority is challenged—acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” *(Matter of Holtzman v Goldman,*71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; *see Matter of Rush v Mordue,*68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Luciano and Townes, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2715 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2715

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rules for 
 constructive ownership with respect to real estate investment trusts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 13, 2021

Mr. Menendez (for himself and Mr. Young) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to modify the rules for 
 constructive ownership with respect to real estate investment trusts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF REIT CONSTRUCTIVE OWNERSHIP RULES.

    (a) In General.--Section 856(d)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of subparagraph (A), by 
striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) and inserting ``, 
and'', and by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) except as otherwise provided by the 
                Secretary, stock, assets, and net profits 
                constructively owned by a partnership, estate, trust, 
                or corporation by reason of the application of section 
                318(a)(3) (after application of subparagraphs (A) and 
                (B)) shall not be considered as owned by it for 
                purposes of again applying such section in order to 
                make another person the constructive owner of such 
                stock, assets, or net profits.
        Subparagraph (C) shall not prevent any person from being the 
        constructive owner of stock, assets, or net profits of any 
        person as the result of any other application of section 318(a) 
        (as modified by this paragraph).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
    (c) No Inference.--Nothing in this Act or the amendments made by 
this Act shall be construed to create any inference with respect to the 
proper application of section 318 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
to cases other than cases to which such amendments apply.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
				  to 
			 Certificate Holders

			 Scheduled        Unscheduled                Ending
Class        Interest     Pricipal          Principal               Balance
<S>     <C>             <C>             <C>                  <C>

A1         129,457.86      19,855.78        144,150.25        4,908,497.98 
A2          97,202.08           0.00              0.00        4,165,803.00 
A3         180,445.84           0.00              0.00        6,985,000.00 
A4          67,166.68           0.00              0.00        2,600,000.00 
A5         916,925.81      99,519.27              0.00       35,430,880.73 
A6         777,351.56     105,406.34        765,235.78       29,545,441.88 
A7         516,298.23      39,233.28        257,256.36       19,786,414.35 
A8       2,407,210.85     320,137.97      2,099,175.24       95,963,180.78 
A9         168,358.68           0.00              0.00        7,064,000.00 
A10        317,703.38     102,300.52        666,906.31       13,133,557.17 
A11         74,931.65           0.00        (74,931.64)       2,947,562.64 
A12      1,075,062.49      16,140.36       (762,241.71)      35,114,888.80 
A13        181,295.10     329,350.52      2,696,065.43        5,275,570.04 
A14      1,125,624.00           0.00              0.00       46,901,000.00 
A15        913,013.18      84,735.77        555,620.55       36,090,030.67 
A16        158,666.68           0.00              0.00        6,800,000.00 
ALR              0.65           9.10             90.90                0.00 
AR               0.65           9.10             90.90                0.00 
M          247,229.10      26,833.21              0.00        9,553,166.79 
B1         123,588.75      13,413.80              0.00        4,775,586.20 
B2          98,891.64      10,733.27              0.00        3,821,266.72 
B3          49,445.82       5,366.64              0.00        1,910,633.36 
B4          24,722.91       2,683.33              0.00          955,316.68 
B5          49,445.48       4,243.91              0.00        1,910,619.63 
    
Total    9,700,039.07   1,179,972.17      6,347,418.37  





</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING
MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

YOGENDRA S. DHANIK and BHARTI )
Y. DHANIK, ) ) Appellants, ) )

v. ) Case No. 2D13

- 5292 )

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ) ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for LUMINENT )

MORTGAGE TRUST 2007

- 2, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed September 9, 2016.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; William H. Burgess, III, Judge.

Michael E. Rodriguez of Foreclosure Defense Law Firm, P.L., Tampa, for Appellants.

Dean A. Morande and Michael K. Winston of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellee.

LaROSE, Judge

.

Yogendra and Bharti Dhanik appeal a final judgment of foreclosure. The

Dhaniks argue, and HSBC Bank USA concedes, that the bank failed to present

sufficient trial evidence of standing at the time it filed the complaint.- 2

- "This court reviews the sufficiency of the evidence to prove standing to

bring a foreclosure action de novo ." Lamb v. Nationstar Mortg., LLC , 174 So. 3d 1039,

1040 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

"A plaintiff alleging standing as a holder must prove it is a holder of the

note and mortgage both as of the time of trial and also that the (original) plaintiff had

standing as of the time the foreclosure complaint was filed." Russell v. Aurora Loan

Servs., LLC , 163 So. 3d 639, 642 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (quoting Keifert v. Nationstar

Mortg., LLC , 153 So. 3d 351, 352 (Fla. 1 st DCA 2014)). "If the plaintiff is not the payee

of the original note, the plaintiff must also prove that th e original note contains an

[e] ndorsement in favor of the plaintiff (special [e] ndorsement) or an [e] ndorsement in

blank. " Id. To establish standing, the endorsement " must have been made prior to the

filing of the lawsuit ." Id.

Although the bank attac hed a copy of the mortgage and note to the

complaint, those copies lacked any endorsement to the bank or a blank endorsement.

The note introduced at trial contained a blank endorsement. However , the bank offered

no evidence as to when the blank endorseme nt was placed on the note. Thus , there

was no evidence before the trial court that the bank had standing at the time the

foreclosure complaint was filed. "The bank's failure to prove a prima facie case

warrants dismissal." May v. PHH Mortg. Corp. , 150 S o. 3d 247, 249 (Fla. 2d DCA

2014)

.

As in Russell and May , we reverse and remand for the trial court to enter

an order of involuntary dismissal based on the bank's lack of standing at the time it filed

the complaint.

Reversed and remanded with instructions.- 3

- NORTHCUTT and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
### LARAMIE ENERGY 

## II, LLC 

### 1512 LARIMER STREET, SUITE 

### 1000 DENVER, 

### CO 80202 TEL: (303) 339-4400 FAX: (303) 339-4399

October 1 1, 201 J Carissa Erickson Toxic Substances Control Act Document Control Officer

­ US Environmental Protection Agency Hydraulic Fracturing Information Request Care of: Eastern Research Group 14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200 Chantilly, VA 20151
Dear Carissa, On the enclosed thumb drive, you will find data on the wells you asked about. Some of the files are organized a little differently, depending on what was available , but most of it should be selfexplanatory. All of this data should be considered confidential. Please let me know ifyou have any questions. Sincerely,

Chase Boswell chaseboswell@laramie-energy.com 303.339.4665**~** 0 I I 10/

### R 00 (
Exhibit 99.19

News
Release
May 12, 2000

Trading Symbols:TRBD (EASDAQ)

TURBODYNE POSTPONES ANNUAL SHAREHOLDERS MEETING

Carpinteria, CAMay 12, 2000Turbodyne Technologies Inc. (EASDAQ:TRBD) announces
that, because shares represented in person or by proxy at the annual shareholders meeting scheduled for May 12, 2000 did not constitute a quorum, the annual shareholders meeting has been
postponed to Friday, May 26, 2000, at 1:30 PM at the Company's Headquarters, located at 6155 Carpinteria Avenue, Carpinteria, California.

Turbodyne
Technologies Inc., a California based high technology company, specializes in the development of charging technology for internal combustion engines plus the development and
manufacturing of high-tech assemblies for electrically assisted turbochargers and superchargers. Turbodyne Technologies Inc.'s headquarters is located in Carpinteria, CA; the European business
location is Frankfurt, Germany.

Contacts:

Corporate
Communications, Peter Weichselbraun (800) 566-1130
VP Group FinanceInvestor Relations, Ken Fitzpatrick (800) 566-1130
European Investor Relations, Markus Kumbrink +49-69-975-44-665

---

QuickLinks
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00357-CV

EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES, TIM 

EDWARDS

APPELLANTS

V.

AZLEWAY, INC. AND GARY DUKE APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 17TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 017-281397-15

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

Appellants filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s July 28, 2016 

“Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.” The trial court 

subsequently granted appellants’ motion for new trial on September 28, 2016, 

while it still had plenary jurisdiction over the case. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 329b(e).

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

On October 3, 2016, we informed the parties that it appeared the trial 

court’s granting of the motion for new trial rendered this appeal moot and that the 

appeal would be dismissed as moot unless, on or before October 13, 2016, any 

party desiring to continue the appeal filed a response showing grounds for 

continuing the appeal. Neither party filed a response.

Accordingly, on this court’s own motion, we dismiss the appeal as moot. 

See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, GABRIEL, and SUDDERTH, JJ. 

DELIVERED: November 23, 2016
PAUL GRIBBEN,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0927

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Paul Gribben, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew F. Vitale, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1997
<CASH>                                              71
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,453
<ALLOWANCES>                                       250
<INVENTORY>                                     15,861
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,434
<PP&E>                                           3,741
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,607
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  23,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,957
<BONDS>                                          4,437
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              847
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,270
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    23,552
<SALES>                                         26,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,348
<CGS>                                           20,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,650
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 929
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,280)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,280)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Unigene Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Warren P.
Levy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Warren P. Levy     
|Warren P. Levy         
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 9, 2006         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unigene
Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016007EN.01000501.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/5

---

Lists for the purposes of determining the composition of the formations of the Court

(2016/C 007/09)

At its Meeting on 13 October 2015, the Court drew up the list for determining the composition of the Grand Chamber as follows:

Mr Rosas

Mr Regan

Mr Juhász

Mr Vilaras

Mr Borg Barthet

Mr Lycourgos

Mr Malenovský

Ms Jürimäe

Mr Levits

Mr Biltgen

Mr Bonichot

Mr Rodin

Mr Arabadjiev

Mr Vajda

Ms Toader

Mr Fernlund

Mr Safjan

Mr Jarašiūnas

Mr Šváby

Ms Prechal

Ms Berger

At its Meeting on 13 October 2015, the Court drew up the list for determining the composition of the Chambers of five Judges as follows:

First Chamber:

First Chamber:

Mr Bonichot

Mr Regan

Mr Arabadjiev

Mr Rodin

Mr Fernlund

Second Chamber:

Second Chamber:

Mr Rosas

Mr Jarašiūnas

Ms Toader

Ms Prechal

Third Chamber:

Third Chamber:

Mr Malenovský

Mr Vilaras

Mr Safjan

Mr Šváby

Fourth Chamber:

Fourth Chamber:

Mr Juhász

Mr Lycourgos

Mr Vajda

Ms Jürimäe

Fifth Chamber:

Fifth Chamber:

Mr Borg Barthet

Mr Biltgen

Mr Levits

Ms Berger

At its Meeting on 13 October 2015, the Court drew up the list for determining the composition of the Chambers of three Judges as follows:

Sixth Chamber

Sixth Chamber

Mr Bonichot

Mr Fernlund

Mr Rodin

Mr Regan

Seventh Chamber

Seventh Chamber

Mr Rosas

Ms Prechal

Mr Jarašiūnas

Eighth Chamber

Eighth Chamber

Mr Malenovský

Mr Safjan

Mr Vilaras

Ninth Chamber

Ninth Chamber

Mr Juhász

Mr Vajda

Ms Jürimäe

Tenth Chamber

Tenth Chamber

Mr Borg Barthet

Mr Levits

Ms Berger

---
# C_2015058EN.01000101.xml

| 18.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7332 — BSkyB/Sky Deutschland/Sky Italia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 58/01)

On 11 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7332. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7332. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---