alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             103
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (166)
<INVENTORY>                                      5,067
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,875
<PP&E>                                           4,078
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,261)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,308
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,028
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           190
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,506
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,308
<SALES>                                          3,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,070
<CGS>                                            2,858
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,968
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  97
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      5
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  5
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         5
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
Trendwest Resorts, Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-82065) on Form S-8 of Trendwest Resorts, Inc. of our report dated January
30, 2002, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Trendwest Resorts,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity and comprehensive
income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001, annual report
on Form 10-K of Trendwest Resorts, Inc.



/s/ KPMG LLP
Seattle, Washington
March 29, 2002
# C_2015415EN.01002401.xml

| 15.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 415/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 415/24

---

Calls for proposals under the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020

(Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 7358 (1) amending Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 (2))

1

2

(2015/C 415/09)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport, is announcing a corrigendum to the call for proposals (CEF-Transport-2015-General envelope) in order to award grants in accordance with the priorities and objectives defined in the multiannual work programme for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector, as published in the Official Journal (2015/C-366/05) on 5 November 2015.

The corrigendum to the call for proposals is available on:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-transport/apply-funding/2015-cef-transport-general-call

---

(1)  Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 7358 of 30 October 2015 amending Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 establishing a Multiannual Work Programme 2014 for financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector for the period 2014-2020.

1

(2)  Commission Implementing Decision C(2014) 1921 of 26 March 2014.

2

---
S. 233 

One Hundred Seventeenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two 

An Act 

To designate the Rocksprings Station of the U.S. Border Patrol located on West 

Main Street in Rocksprings, Texas, as the ‘‘Donna M. Doss Border Patrol Station’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Donna M. Doss Memorial Act 

of 2021’’. 

SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

Congress finds the following: 

(1) A native of the State of Washington, Agent Donna 

Marie Doss— 

(A) proudly and honorably served her country as an 

Agent of the U.S. Border Patrol for more than 15 years; 

(B) began her service with the U.S. Border Patrol 

in 2003; and 

(C) graduated as part of the 569th Session of the 

Border Patrol Academy with Class 584 on June 6, 2005. 

(2) Agent Doss— 

(A) served on a Drug Enforcement Administration Task 

Force on the southern border for 3 years before being 

assigned to the northern border; 

(B) was promoted to Supervisory Border Patrol Agent 

in Laredo Border Patrol Sector, where she was named 

an Operations Officer in 2016; and 

(C) relocated to Abilene, Texas in 2017, where she 

served as a Resident Agent. 

(3) On February 2, 2019, Agent Doss responded to a call 

for assistance from the Texas Department of Public Safety 

near Interstate 20 in Tye, Texas. While on scene, Agent Doss 

was struck and killed by a passing vehicle. 

(4) Agent Doss is survived by her husband, father, mother, 

2 stepchildren, a sister and a brother. 

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

The Rocksprings station of the U.S. Border Patrol located on 

West Main Street in Rocksprings, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Donna M. Doss Border Patrol Station’’. 
S. 233—2 

SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, 

or other record of the United States to the station described in 

section 3 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Donna M. 

Doss Border Patrol Station’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD JAMES ARTZ, as Trustee of 

The Edward James Artz Trust, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

ROYCE T. FLORA, Maricopa County 

Treasurer; et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 20-16321 

D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01195-JZB 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 20, 2021

**

Before: McKEOWN, CALLAHAN, and BRESS, Circuit Judges. 

Edward James Artz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action seeking to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction 

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Kilgore v. KeyBank, Nat’l Ass’n, 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JAN 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-16321 

718 F.3d 1052, 1057 (9th Cir. 2013) (denial of motion to compel arbitration); 

Omar v. Sea-Land Serv., Inc., 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987) (sua sponte 

dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Artz’s action because Artz failed to 

allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 

662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual 

matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face” 

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also Kilgore, 718 F.3d at 1058 

(Federal Arbitration Act mandates that the district court “shall direct the parties to 

proceed to arbitration on issues as to which an arbitration agreement has been 

signed,” and the district court must determine “whether a valid agreement to 

arbitrate exists” (citations, internal quotation marks, and emphasis omitted)). 

We reject as without merit Artz’s contentions that the district court violated 

his constitutional rights, or otherwise acted with impropriety or gave the 

appearance of impropriety in its conduct. 

Artz’s “motion to obtain sealed document” (Docket Entry No. 8) is denied as 

unnecessary. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(a) (record on appeal includes original papers 

and exhibits filed in the district court); 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3 (pro se appellant need not 

file excerpts of record). 

///
3 20-16321 

All other pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
#### Richard Davidson et al., Respondents, v Miele Sanitation Co. NY, Inc., Defendant, and Clarkstown Recycling Center, Inc., Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 778]

In an action *to*recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Clarkstown Recycling Center, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), dated January 7, *2003, as*denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

The plaintiff Richard Davidson allegedly sustained personal injuries while employed at a transfer station operated by the defendant Clarkstown Recycling Center, Inc. (hereinafter Clarkstown), as he was assisting the driver of a truck owned by the defendant Miele Sanitation Co. NY, Inc., to back into one of the truck bays. The bays are separated by vertical support columns protected by guardrail barriers and each bay is identified by a small aluminum sign attached to the crossbar. While backing into bay “1,” the driver hooked his truck fender on the crossbar thereby wedging one of the tires against it. The plaintiff directed the driver to turn the steering wheel and drive the truck forward to disengage it from the barrier. As a result, the tire suddenly exploded after being punctured by the sharp edge of the crossbar, the force of the explosion ripping the sign from the guardrail and propelling it through the air some 15 feet where it struck the plaintiff. The Supreme Court denied Clarkstown’s motion for summary judgment, finding issues of fact regarding foreseeability and proximate cause.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the motion for summary judgment. While the issue of proximate cause is ordinarily for the jury to resolve, it may nevertheless be determined as a matter of law that a defendant’s conduct was not the proximate cause of an injury if the evidence conclusively establishes that there was an intervening act which was so extraordinary or far *624removed from the defendant’s conduct as to be unforeseeable *(see Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp.,*51 NY2d 308, 315 [1980]). Under the extraordinary sequence of events presented here, the risk of injury was unforeseeable as a matter of law *(see Di Ponzio v Riordan,*89 NY2d 578 [1997]; *see also Palsgraf v Long Is. R.R. Co.,*248 NY 339 [1928]). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
  **CERTIFICATION**
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section
        302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Limelight Media Group,
        Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        David
        V. Lott, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
        the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
                  or 15(d)
                  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material
                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
                  the
                  Company.
  Date:
              August
                  31, 2005
              By:
              /s/
                  David V. LottDavid
                  V. LottChief
                  Executive Officer
   
 This
        certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
        Sec.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# CA2014254EN.01000101.xml

| 5.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 254/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 254/1

---

RECRUITMENT FOR THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY (LONDON)

2014/C 254 A/01

The Agency is responsible for coordinating the evaluation and supervision of medicinal products for human and veterinary use in the European Union (see Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 136, 30.4.2004, p. 1)). The Agency was established in January 1995. It has many close contacts with the European Commission, the 28 EU Member States, the EEA-EFTA countries and many other groups in government and the private sector.

Further information on the Agency and its activities is readily accessible through the internet; our web address is: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is organising a selection procedure with a view to drawing up a reserve list for:

EMA/AD/362: Administrator (Scientific), Veterinary Medicines Department, Veterinary Medicines Division (AD 6).

EMA/AD/362: Administrator (Scientific), Veterinary Medicines Department, Veterinary Medicines Division (AD 6)

Selected candidates will be included on a reserve list and, depending on the budgetary situation, may be offered a five-year renewable contract in accordance with the Conditions of employment of other servants of the European Union (OJ L 56, 4.3.1968).

The place of employment shall be London.

Candidates must be nationals of a Member State of the European Union, or of Iceland, Norway or Liechtenstein, on condition that they have full rights as a citizen.

The complete conditions and job description should be downloaded from the Agency website:

The complete conditions and job description should be downloaded from the Agency website:

http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/ under ‘Careers at the Agency’.

http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/ under ‘Careers at the Agency’.

Applications have to be submitted electronically using the form available on the Agency website. Deadline for submission of application forms is 16 September 2014 at midnight.

Applications have to be submitted electronically using the form available on the Agency website. Deadline for submission of application forms is 16 September 2014 at midnight.

Please note that due to the large number of applications the Agency may receive, when reaching the deadline for submission of applications, the system may have problems processing the large amounts of data. Applicants are therefore advised to send in their application well ahead of the deadline.

Please note that due to the large number of applications the Agency may receive, when reaching the deadline for submission of applications, the system may have problems processing the large amounts of data. Applicants are therefore advised to send in their application well ahead of the deadline.

If you wish to receive notification of vacancy publications electronically please register online for an RSS feed at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ema/ under ‘RSS news feeds’.

---
.. • --

REF ID:A66we 

INSTRUCTIONS IN RF.PORTING INVESTmATI<JlS 

mo VIOIMIONS OF SJiXlURin 

1.. · ThfJ Chief's ot all office and staff' divisions will oauae 

to be thoroughJ.7 investigated all violations of seaurit7 memorandao 

Those violtJtions discovered by the AFSA Security Patrol will be re• 

ported to the Chief ot the otf'ice or staf'f division concerned at 

0830 ot tbe first regular working dq f'ollowing the discovery ot the 

violation. 

2. The report covering the investigation will be directed to 

AP'SA_... and will contein the following information& 

,, 

a. Statement as to whether or not a violation occurred. 

b. P:lx:lng ot responsibility tor an7 such violation. 

a. Statement rf".garding whether or not any claeaif':led 

mater:l.al E- xpoaed by the violation is missing and whetht~r or not it is believed a compranise occurred. 

d. A statl!lllent as to 8111' action taken to prevent recurrence 

of security violations as well es e r.-port of en,-

disoiplinal'l" action taken in the event responsibility has been fixed. 

e. An7 further action recanmended. 

t. PertinP.ut statements f'ram. interested parties. 

3. Only one cow ot the investigation ia required. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-08-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
#### Murray vs. Van Derlyn.

*Justice’s Court*— Title *to land.*

A fence is part of tlie realty, and if, in an action before a justice of the peace, there is a dispute between the parties, adjoining lot owners, as to the title to a division fence, this is a question as *to*“ the title of land ” (R. S. ch. 120, sec. 51), which,, if the proper bond is tendered, deprives the justice of jurisdiction.

ERROR to tie Circuit Court for *Rode*County.

Trespass *guare clausum,*commenced by *Murray*before a justice of the peace. A judgment for the plaintiff rendered by the justice was reversed on *certiorari*by the circuit court; and he took his writ of error to reverse that decision. The question involved will sufficiently appear from the opinion.

*Moggie & Castle,*for plaintiff in error.

*Conger & Sloan,*for. defendant in error.

Paine, J.

The single question presented is, whether, in an action for a trespass before a justice of the peace, an answer setting up that the defendant was the owner of a lot adjoining that of the plaintiff on which the trespass was alleged to have been committed, and that the alleged trespass consisted in taking away the division fence between the lots, and that the fence belonged to the defendant, and that he had a right to take it away, raises a question of title to real estate, which, if the proper bond is tendered, deprives the justice of the power to try the case. We think it does.

A fence is a part of the realty. A division fence may belong entirely to one owner, and he may have a right to take it away. If he does own it, he owns it as a part of his land. If the owner of the adjoining tract claims title to it, he claims it as a part of his land. And, although there may be no dispute between them in *68respect to their respective titles to the soil itself, yet a dispute as to the title to the line fence raises a question as to the title to real estate.

The proper bond having been tendered, the justice had no authority to proceed with the case, and his judgment was properly reversed by the circuit court.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Leading Edge Packaging, Inc. and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             226,785
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      805,349
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,324,425
<INVENTORY>                                      2,608,496
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,458,486
<PP&E>                                           1,984,653
<DEPRECIATION>                                     238,480
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,443,139
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,587,688
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,750,000
<COMMON>                                            55,625
<OTHER-SE>                                     (19,787,097)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,443,139
<SALES>                                          6,414,657
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                            6,484,342
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,484,342
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,929,521
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (187,138)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (8,310,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,560,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (16,750,950)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (16,770,074)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (3.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (3.01)



</TABLE>