alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 10, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 10, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0076. MANUEL LAMAN JACKSON v. THE STATE .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

15CR72321
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule  contains summary financial  information  extracted from Form
     10Q at May 31, 2000 and is  qualified  in its entirety by reference to such
     financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-2000
<CASH>                                             11,000
<SECURITIES>                                    1,453,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    9,000
<PP&E>                                             25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (24,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,474,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,762,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                       (313,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,474,000
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 (403,000)
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   67,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  3,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (473,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (473,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (473,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (0.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.20)



</TABLE>
#### Whitney and another vs. Morrow.

The decision of this court upon the questions considered in *Whitney v. Gunderson,*81 Wis., 359, and *Whitney v. Nelson,*33 id., 365, reaffirmed.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Brown*County.

Ejectment, for a tract of land in the Borough of Fort Howard, in Brown county, described as follows : “ bounded on the north by Private Claim No. 1, confirmed to Jacques Porlier, on the east by Fox river, on the south by vacant strip confirmed to Alexis G-ardapier, and on the west by Lot No. Ill of Fort Howard Reservation, containing ninety-four and 76-100 acres.” The answer, in addition to a general denial, set up title in the defendant by virtue of adverse possession and the statute of limitations.

The jury, by direction of the court, found a verdict for the plaintiffs; and defendant appealed from a judgment on the verdict.

*Neville & Tracy,*for appellant.

*Martin & Vroman,*for respondents.

Lyon, J.

The material facts of this case are the same as in *Whitney v.*Gunderson, 31 Wis., 359, and *Whitney v. Nelson,*33 *439id., 365; and all questions presented by this appeal were considered and decided in those cases. We adhere to those decisions ; and, inasmuch as the principles there laid down have been correctly applied to this case by the circuit court, the judgment of that court must be affirmed.

*By the Court*. — Judgment affirmed.

Ryan, C. J., takes no part in this decision.
**EXHIBIT 15**

To the Board of Directorsand Shareholder ofAllstate Life Insurance Company:

We have reviewed, inaccordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States), the unaudited interim financial information of Allstate LifeInsurance Company and subsidiaries for the three-month and nine-month periodsended September 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated in our report dated November 6,2006; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on thatinformation.

We are aware that ourreport referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006, is incorporated by reference inthe following Registration Statements:
| Form S-3 Registration Statement Nos. | ** ** | **Form N-4 Registration Statement Nos.** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|
| 333-100068                           |       | 333-102934                               |
| 333-102319                           |       | 333-114560                               |
| 333-102325                           |       | 333-114561                               |
| 333-104789                           |       | 333-114562                               |
| 333-105331                           |       | 333-121691                               |
| 333-112233                           |       | 333-121693                               |
| 333-112249                           |       |                                     |
| 333-117685                           |       |                                     |
| 333-119296                           |       |                                     |
| 333-119706                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121739                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121741                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121742                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121745                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121811                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121812                           |       |                                     |
| 333-123847                           |       |                                     |
| 333-125937                           |       |                                     |
| 333-129157                           |       |                                     |
| 333-137625                           |       |                                     |

 

We also are aware thatthe aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statement prepared orcertified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountantwithin the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & ToucheLLP

Chicago, IllinoisNovember 6, 2006

E-2

----
# C_2015371EN.01000101.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 371/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 363, 3.11.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 354, 26.10.2015

OJ C 346, 19.10.2015

OJ C 337, 12.10.2015

OJ C 328, 5.10.2015

OJ C 320, 28.9.2015

OJ C 311, 21.9.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00108-CV

Michael Reid

v.

UDR Texas Properties, LLC; UDR 

Texas Properties, LLC, Successor to 

UDR Texas Properties, LP; UDR 

The Cliffs, LLC; UDR, Inc.; and 

Western Residential, Inc.

§

§

§

§

From County Court at Law No. 3

of Tarrant County (2012-007946-3)

November 23, 2016

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

It is further ordered that appellant Michael Reid shall bear the costs of this 

appeal, for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report (the "Report") of China
Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Chris Peng Mao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

i. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the Securities Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                                 /s/ Chris Peng Mao
                                                 ------------------

                                                 Chris Peng Mao
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                                 August 14, 2008


This Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 is not "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by
applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.



<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2374 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2374

 To impose sanctions with respect to the Supreme Leader of the Islamic 
  Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Sayyud Ebrahim Raisol-
 Sadati, who was elected president of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 
                    the 2021 presidential election.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2021

   Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Cramer, Mr. 
 Johnson, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Graham, Mr. Scott of Florida, 
 Mr. Rounds, Mr. Braun, Mr. Hagerty, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Cornyn, Mrs. Hyde-
 Smith, Mr. Young, and Mr. Rubio) introduced the following bill; which 
   was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To impose sanctions with respect to the Supreme Leader of the Islamic 
  Republic of Iran, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Sayyud Ebrahim Raisol-
 Sadati, who was elected president of the Islamic Republic of Iran in 
                    the 2021 presidential election.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS WITH RESPECT TO OFFICIALS OF THE 
              ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN.

    The President shall impose the sanctions described in section 
1263(b) of the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act 
(Subtitle F of title XII of Public Law 114-328; 22 U.S.C. 2656 note) 
with respect to the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Sayyud Ebrahim Raisol-Sadati, who was 
elected president of the Islamic Republic of Iran in the 2021 
presidential election.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jones, Respondent, vs. Superior Rapid Transit Railway Company, Appellant.

*October 1*

December *17, 1895.*

*Johnson v. Superior JR. T. B. Co., ante,*p. 233, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Douglas county: Chaeles Smith, Judge.

*Reversed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Ross, Dwyer & JRaniteh,*and oral argument by *W. D. Dwyer.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *McHugh, Lyons*efe *McIntosh,*and oral argument by *T. E. Lyons.*

The following opinion was filed October 22, 1895:

Oassoday, C. J.

The plaintiff brings this action to recover damages sustained by her in the same collision mentioned in the case of *Johnson v. Superior R. T. R. Co., ante,*p. 233. There is a general verdict in favor of the plaintiff in this case for $3,500, and also a special verdict in her favor,, very much the same as in that case, except as modified by the fact that the plaintiff in this case was driving the horse. The charge in this case contains one of the same errors just considered in the *Johnson Case,*to the effect that the plaintiff could recover even in a case where both parties were guilty of a want of ordinary care. As this must work a reversal, and in view of the opinion filed in that case, it is. unnecessary to say more.

*By the Oowrt,*— The judgment of the superior court of Douglas county is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.

A motion for a rehearing was denied December 17, 1895.
# C_2015003EN.01000501.xml

| 8.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 3/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 3/5

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2015/C 3/06)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition

EPSO/AST-SC/03/15

Secretaries/Clerks (grades SC1 and SC2)

in the following fields:

| 1) | Administrative support |
| --- | --- |

1)

Administrative support

| 2) | Financial support |
| --- | --- |

2)

Financial support

| 3) | Secretarial support |
| --- | --- |

3)

Secretarial support

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 3 A of 8 January 2015.

Further information can be found on EPSO’s website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
# C_2015057EN.01000102.xml

| 17.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 57/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 57/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7270 — Český Aeroholding/Travel Service/České aerolinie)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 57/02)

On 18 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7270. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7270. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







August 13, 2010
By:
/s/ Pengcheng ChenPengcheng Chen, CEO
TIMOTHY LEE MOORE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D17-2618

_____________________________/

Opinion filed September 7, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

Michael C. Overstreet, Judge.

Timothy Lee Moore, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

BILBREY, WINSOR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 22, 2016

No. 04-15-00729-CV

CITY OF RIO GRANDE CITY, TEXAS, and Joel Villarreal, Herman R. Garza III, Arcadio J. 

Salinas III, Rey Ramirez, and Dave Jones in their Official Capacities,

Appellants

v.

BFI WASTE SERVICES OF TEXAS, LP d/b/a Allied Waste Services of Rio Grande Valley,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-15-604

Honorable Migdalia Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The court has considered the appellants’ motion for en banc reconsideration, and the 

motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

K.J. BRUBAKER, M.C. HOLIFIELD, T.J. STINSON

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

JASON IDANAN

ENGINEMAN SECOND CLASS (E

- 5), U.S. NAVY

NMCCA 2 01500258

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 31 March 2015

. Military Judge: CAPT A.H. Henderson, JAGC, USN

. Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47)

. For Appellant: LT Doug Ottenwess, JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Kell er , Esq

.

31 December 2015

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT

---------------------------------------------------

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without

assignment of error, we affi rm the findings and sentence as approved by

the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice,

10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
# C_2015266EN.01000301.xml

| 14.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 266/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 266/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 August 2015

(2015/C 266/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1109 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4631 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71060 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4520 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0849 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0745 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,024 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,67 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1882 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4100 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0993 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5121 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4455 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6120 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6895 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5539 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 309,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,2205 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1078 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5475 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 368,89 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4555 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,312 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,4290 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,190 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8793 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0982 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,4630 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1109

JPY

Japanese yen

138,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4631

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71060

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4520

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0849

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0745

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,024

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,67

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1882

RON

Romanian leu

4,4100

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0993

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5121

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4455

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6120

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6895

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5539

KRW

South Korean won

1 309,14

ZAR

South African rand

14,2205

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1078

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5475

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 368,89

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4555

PHP

Philippine peso

51,312

RUB

Russian rouble

71,4290

THB

Thai baht

39,190

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8793

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0982

INR

Indian rupee

72,4630

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---