alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015339EN.01000301.xml

| 14.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 October 2015

(2015/C 339/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1374 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,16 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4608 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2560 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0910 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2690 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,131 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,53 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2391 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4163 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3600 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5585 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4840 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8149 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6974 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5929 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 308,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,3060 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2123 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6165 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 511,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7735 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,384 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,4085 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,532 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,3271 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,8763 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,1414 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1374

JPY

Japanese yen

136,16

DKK

Danish krone

7,4608

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74800

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2560

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0910

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2690

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,131

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,53

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2391

RON

Romanian leu

4,4163

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3600

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5585

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4840

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8149

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6974

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5929

KRW

South Korean won

1 308,93

ZAR

South African rand

15,3060

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2123

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6165

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 511,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7735

PHP

Philippine peso

52,384

RUB

Russian rouble

71,4085

THB

Thai baht

40,532

BRL

Brazilian real

4,3271

MXN

Mexican peso

18,8763

INR

Indian rupee

74,1414

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Home City Financial Corporation, (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
we, Douglas L. Ulery, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Charles A.
Mihal, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Douglas L. Ulery                       /s/ Charles A. Mihal
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
Douglas L. Ulery                           Charles A. Mihal
President and Chief Executive Officer      Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
March 24, 2003                             March 24, 2003
-------------------------------------      -------------------------------------
Date:                                      Date:


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Home City Financial Corporation and will be retained by Home City
Financial Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 12/31/96 CONTAINED IN THE COMPANY'S FORM
10-K (RESTATED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH (B) REPORT
ON FORM 10-K (RESTATED).
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          36,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (478)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,431
<PP&E>                                           7,114
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  55,324
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,469
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            82
<OTHER-SE>                                      41,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    55,324
<SALES>                                         51,835
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                51,835
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,470
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   172
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 259
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (75)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       689
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (764)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    231
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (533)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.38<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.38<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS IS BASED ON PRO FORMA NET EARNINGS OF $2,311,000
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2015062EN.01000101.xml

| 20.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7481 — Brookfield/TDF)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 62/01)

On 12 February 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7481. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7481. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
AMENDMENT TO
                      CHANGE IN CONTROL SEVERANCE AGREEMENT



                  WHEREAS, Ronald N. Zebeck (the "Executive") and Metris
Companies, Inc. (the "Company") (collectively, the "Parties") have entered into
a Change of Control Severance Agreement dated May 15, 1998 (the "Agreement");
and

                  WHEREAS,  Section  10.6 of the  Agreement  provides  that such
Agreement may be amended by written  instrument  executed by the Company and the
Executive; and

                  WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Agreement in certain
respects;

                  NOW  THEREFORE,  the  Agreement is hereby  amended,  effective
December 9, 1998, as follows:

                  1. Section 2.6 of the  Agreement is hereby  amended to provide
that the  transaction  effected by the document  entitled  "Securities  Purchase
Agreement between Metris Companies Inc. and Thomas H. Lee Equity Fund IV, L.P.,"
dated  November  13,  1998  (the  "Securities  Purchase  Agreement")  shall  not
constitute a "Change in Control" for purposes of paragraph a. of such section.

                  2. Section 2.6 of the Agreement is hereby  further  amended to
provide that any  director  elected  pursuant to Section 5.04 of the  Securities
Purchase Agreement shall not be treated as an "Incumbent  Director" for purposes
of paragraph b. of Section 2.6 of the Agreement.

                  3.  Paragraph  b. of Section  2.6 of the  Agreement  is hereby
further amended to provide that the term "Effective Date" shall, for purposes of
the transaction effected by the Securities Purchase Agreement,  mean the date on
which  securities  are first  acquired  by Thomas H. Lee  Equity  Fund IV,  L.P.
("Lee") pursuant to such agreement.

                  Notwithstanding  the  foregoing,  nothing  herein shall in any
manner adversely affect any of the Executive's other rights under the Agreement,
including but not limited to rights  triggered in  connection  with a "Change in
Control"  as  defined  in  Section  2.6.b.  of the  Agreement  in the event that
incumbent  directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of the board,
as provided for therein.


                  IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  Executive  and  the  Company  have
executed this Agreement as of December 9, 1998.


                      /s/Ronald N. Zebeck
                      METRIS COMPANIES INC.

                      By: Ronald N. Zebeck
                      Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of D.O.A.I., a child, * From the 318th District Court

of Midland County,

Trial Court No. FM 57,834.

No. 11-16-00141-CV * November 30, 2016

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J., 

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the order below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the order of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of Forsyth Bancshares, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy  M.  Perry,  President  &  Principal  Executive  Officer of the Company,
certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of
the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

(1)  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Timothy M. Perry
--------------------

Timothy M. Perry
President & Principal Executive Officer
March 27, 2003



<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hankersen International
Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief
Executive Officer of us, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of us.


August 13, 2007


By: /S/ PENGCHENG CHEN
    --------------------
    Pengcheng Chen, CEO
NATACHA TSANA-SAMBO,

Plaintiff,

 v.

ERIC HOLDER, United States Attorney

General, et al. 

Defendants.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Civil Action No. 13-1175 (CKK)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

(December 16, 2013)

On July 31, 2013, Plaintiff Natacha Tsana-Sambo commenced this action against multiple

United States Government officials in the United States Department of Justice and the Department

of Homeland Security to compel the Defendants to adjudicate her Form I-485 Application to Adjust

to Permanent Resident Status. On November 20, 2013, the Defendants filed a [13] Motion to

Dismiss, or in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7(b) and

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d), Plaintiff had a total of seventeen days, or until December 9,

2013, to file an opposition to Defendants’ Motion. Local Civil Rule 7(b) also placed Plaintiff on

notice that if a memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to a motion “is not filed within

the prescribed time, the Court may treat the motion as conceded.” Plaintiff, who has been

represented by counsel throughout these proceedings, failed to file an opposition to Defendants’

Motion. As of today, the docket reflects that Plaintiff has filed neither an opposition nor a motion

for an extension of time. 

Based on the absence of a timely response by Plaintiff, the Court shall, in an exercise of its
discretion, treat the Defendants’ Motion as conceded. Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia,

117 F.3d 571, 577 (D.C. Cir. 1997) (“[T]he district court [may] rel[y] on the absence of a response

as a basis for treating a motion as conceded.”). An appropriate Order accompanies this

Memorandum Opinion.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY

United States District Judge

2
• REF ID:A363~B 

.. 

!N T!m UNITED STATES PATEHT OFFICE ~ 

Seria No. _ _.5.,.5"'1,....1,...7 ... 2,.__ ______ _ 

Filed~ Au~Rt 25 11 19.ff 

For: AlJTlp.;NTICtt_TINj! DEVICE 

~onorable Commissioner of Patents 

w·ashingt,,n, D~· c. 

Sir: 

Div. 53 

Rn om 

I hereby revoke the power of at!:;or:r..ey granted to WillUun. D. Hall 

whose ~ddres~ is .care of The Chief Signal Officer, Washington 25, D. c • 

.and appoint !farry M. Saragovitz, Registration No. 15,,471 and La;wrenoe 

Glassman, ;~e¢tstration lfo. 15, 706 jointly or singly as my attorney in 

1 the above identi':f'i~d appU.cation. Please address all correspondence 

to the said Harry M, Saragovitz whose address is care of The Chief 

Signal Officer, Legal Division, ~ashington 25, D. c • 

. Da.te 

" 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
# C_2016062EN.01000501.xml

| 18.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 62/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 62/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 February 2016

(2016/C 62/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1136 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,10 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4645 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77835 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4723 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,1034 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5955 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,044 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3979 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4550 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2961 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5629 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5387 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6764 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6902 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5703 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 368,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,4320 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2685 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6173 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 019,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,6939 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,039 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 85,1875 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,678 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4866 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,8655 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,2800 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1136

JPY

Japanese yen

127,10

DKK

Danish krone

7,4645

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77835

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4723

CHF

Swiss franc

1,1034

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5955

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,044

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3979

RON

Romanian leu

4,4550

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2961

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5629

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5387

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6764

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6902

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5703

KRW

South Korean won

1 368,24

ZAR

South African rand

17,4320

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2685

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6173

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 019,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,6939

PHP

Philippine peso

53,039

RUB

Russian rouble

85,1875

THB

Thai baht

39,678

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4866

MXN

Mexican peso

20,8655

INR

Indian rupee

76,2800

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Orckit Communications Ltd.
                                  Exhibit Index


Exhibit
Number                               Title                                 Page

1.1    Memorandum of Association, as amended.

1.2    Fourth Amended and Restated Articles of Association.

4.10   Orckit Communications Ltd. 2003 Subsidiary Employee Share Incentive Plan.

8.1    Subsidiaries of Orckit Communications Ltd.

10.3   Consent of Kesselman & Kesselman, independent auditors of Orckit
       Communications Ltd.

99.1   Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

99.2   Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Casey J. Sylla, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Allstate Life Insurance Company;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| November 10,  2004 |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    | /s/  Casey J. Sylla |   |
|                    | Casey  J. Sylla |
|                    | Chairman of the Board and President |

 

E-3

----
## NO. 12

- 12

- 00242

- CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE: WILLIAM W. AD AMS,

RELATOR §

§

§ ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

On July 31, 2013, this Court delivered an opinion conditiona lly granting the petition for

writ of mandamus filed by William W. Adams. That opinion and corresponding order directed

Respondent to vacate his Order on Movant’s Emergency Motion to Enforce Permanent

Injunction and Motion for Contempt signed on May 14, 2 012. Respondent has complied with

our opinion and order of May 14, 2012.

All issues attendant to this original proceeding having been disposed of, this mandamus

proceeding has now been rendered moot; therefore, the writ need not issue. Accordingly, this

original proceeding is dismissed as moot.

Opinion delivered August 14, 2013.

Panel consisted of Griffith, J., Hoyle, J., and Bass, Retired J., Twelfth Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment.

( PUBLISH )

## CO URT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

AUGUST 14 , 201 3

NO. 12

- 12

- 00 242

- C V

WILLIAM W. ADAMS

, Relator

v.
HON. CHARLES R. MITCHELL

,

Respondent



### O RIGINAL 

### P ROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus filed

by WILLIAM W. ADAMS , who is the relator in Cause No. 97CV

- 25,690 , pending on the

docket of the 273rd Judicial District Court of Shelby County , Texas. Said petition for writ of

mandamus having been filed herein on July 16 , 2012, and the same having been duly considered,

because it is the opinion of this Court that a writ of mandamus should not issue, it is therefore

CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORD ERED that the said petition for writ of mandamus be,

and the same is, hereby D ISMISS ED

.

By per curiam opinion

. Panel consisted of Griffith, J., Hoyle, J. , and Bass, Retired J., Twelfth Court of Appeals,
sitting by assignment.