Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 56 / Tuesday, March 24, 2015 / Notices 15641 

liability insurance and to withdraw 

from participation in the retrospective 

rating pool for deferred premium 

charges. As discussed in these 

documents, once the zirconium fire 

concern is determined to be negligible, 

possible accident scenario risks at 

permanently shutdown and defueled 

reactors are greatly reduced, when 

compared to operating reactors, and the 

associated potential for offsite financial 

liabilities from an accident are 

commensurately less. The licensee has 

analyzed and the staff has confirmed 

that the possible accidents that could 

result in an offsite radiological risk are 

minimal, thereby justifying the 

proposed reductions in offsite liability 

insurance and withdrawal from 

participation in the secondary 

retrospective rating pool for deferred 

premium charges. 

Additionally, participation in the 

secondary retrospective rating pool 

could be problematic for DEK because 

the licensee would incur financial 

liability, if an extraordinary nuclear 

incident occurred at another nuclear 

power plant. Because KPS is 

permanently shut down, it does not 

produce revenue from electricity 

generation sales to cover such a liability. 

Therefore, such liability, if incurred, 

could significantly affect the financial 

resources available to the facility to 

conduct and complete radiological 

decontamination and decommissioning 

activities. Furthermore, the shared 

financial risk exposure to DEK is greatly 

disproportionate to the radiological risk 

posed by KPS, when compared to 

operating reactors. 

The reduced overall risk to the public 

at decommissioning power plants does 

not warrant DEK to carry full operating 

reactor insurance coverage, after the 

requisite spent fuel cooling period has 

elapsed, following final reactor 

shutdown. The licensee’s proposed 

financial protection limits will maintain 

a level of liability insurance coverage 

commensurate with the risk to the 

public. These changes are consistent 

with previous NRC policy and 

exemptions approved for other 

decommissioning reactors. Thus, the 

underlying purpose of the regulations 

will not be adversely affected by the 

reductions in insurance coverage. 

Accordingly, the NRC staff concludes 

that granting the exemption from 10 

CFR 140.11(a)(4) is in the public 

interest. 

C. Environmental Considerations 

The NRC approval of the exemption 

to insurance or indemnity requirements 

belongs to a category of actions that the 

Commission, by rule or regulation, has 

declared to be a categorical exclusion, 

after first finding that the category of 

actions does not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. Specifically, 

the exemption is categorically excluded 

from further analysis in accordance with 

10 CFR 51.22(c)(25). 

Under 10 CFR 51.22(c)(25), granting 

of an exemption from the requirements 

of any regulation of Chapter I to 10 CFR 

is a categorical exclusion provided that 

(i) there is no significant hazards 

consideration; (ii) there is no significant 

change in the types or significant 

increase in the amounts of any effluents 

that may be released offsite; (iii) there is 

no significant increase in individual or 

cumulative public or occupational 

radiation exposure; (iv) there is no 

significant construction impact; (v) 

there is no significant increase in the 

potential for or consequences from 

radiological accidents; and (vi) the 

requirements from which an exemption 

is sought involve: surety, insurance, or 

indemnity requirements. 

The Director, Division of Operating 

Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation, has determined that 

approval of the exemption request 

involves no significant hazards 

consideration because reducing a 

licensee’s offsite liability requirements 

at KPS does not (1) involve a significant 

increase in the probability or 

consequences of an accident previously 

evaluated; (2) create the possibility of a 

new or different kind of accident from 

any accident previously evaluated; or 

(3) involve a significant reduction in a 

margin of safety. The exempted 

financial protection regulation is 

unrelated to the operation of KPS. 

Accordingly, there is no significant 

change in the types or significant 

increase in the amounts of any effluents 

that may be released offsite, and no 

significant increase in individual or 

cumulative public or occupational 

radiation exposure. The exempted 

regulation is not associated with 

construction, so there is no significant 

construction impact. The exempted 

regulation does not concern the source 

term (i.e., potential amount of radiation 

in an accident), nor mitigation. 

Therefore, there is no significant 

increase in the potential for, or 

consequences of, a radiological 

accident. In addition, there would be no 

significant impacts to biota, water 

resources, historic properties, cultural 

resources, or socioeconomic conditions 

in the region. The requirement for 

offsite liability insurance may be viewed 

as involving surety, insurance, or 

indemnity matters. 

Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 

51.22(b) and 51.22(c)(25), no 

environmental impact statement or 

environmental assessment need be 

prepared in connection with the 

approval of this exemption request. 

IV. Conclusions 

Accordingly, the Commission has 

determined that, pursuant to 10 CFR 

140.8, the exemption is authorized by 

law, and is otherwise in the public 

interest. Therefore, the Commission 

hereby grants DEK exemption from the 

requirement of 10 CFR 140.11(a)(4) to 

permit the licensee to reduce primary 

offsite liability insurance to $100 

million, accompanied by withdrawal 

from participation in the secondary 

insurance pool for offsite liability 

insurance. 

The exemption is effective upon 

issuance. 

Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 13th day 

of March, 2015. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

Michele G. Evans, 

Director, Division of Operating Reactor 

Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor 

Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06730 Filed 3–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

OFFICE OF NATIONAL DRUG 

CONTROL POLICY 

Paperwork Reduction Act; Proposed 

Collection; Comment Request 

AGENCY: Office of National Drug Control 

Policy. 

ACTION: Notice of Submission to OMB 

and 30-Day Public Comment Period. 

Reinstatement with Change of 

Previously Approved Collection: DrugFree Communities Support Program 

National Evaluation. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. 

L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the 

Office of National Drug Control Policy 

(ONDCP) announces it will submit to 

the Office of Management and Budget 

(OMB) Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) an 

information collection request for 

processing under 5 CFR 1320.10. The 

purpose of this notice is to allow for an 

additional 30 days of public comment. 

DATES: Public comments will be 

accepted until April 23, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the collection title by name or OMB 

Control Number, and should be sent to: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

15642 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 56 / Tuesday, March 24, 2015 / Notices 

Desk Officer for ONDCP, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Office of Management and Budget, 725 

17th Street NW., Room 10235, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503 or electronically mailed to 

oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Helen Hernandez, Administrator, DrugFree Communities Support Program. 

Facsimile and email are the most 

reliable means of communication. Ms. 

Hernandez’s facsimile number is 202– 

395–6641, and her email address is 

hhernandez@ondcp.eop.gov. Mailing 

address is: Executive Office of the 

President, Office of National Drug 

Control Policy, Drug-Free Communities 

Support Program, 750 17th Street NW., 

Washington, DC 20503. Copies of 

available documents submitted to OMB 

are available from and for further 

information Ms. Hernandez may be 

contacted at 202–395–6665. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice informs the public that ONDCP 

has submitted to OMB a request for 

approval of the information collection 

described in Section A. 

The Federal Register notice that 

solicited public comment on the 

information collection for a period of 60 

days was published on December 1, 

2014 (FR #2014–28273). 

A. Overview of Information Collection 

Title of Information Collection: DrugFree Communities (DFC) Support 

Program National Evaluation. 

OMB Approval Number: 3201–0012. 

Type of Request: Reinstatement with 

change of a previously approved 

collection. 

Form Number: NA. 

Description of the need for the 

information and proposed use: ONDCP 

administers the Drug-Free Communities 

(DFC) Support Program in partnership 

with the Substance Abuse and Mental 

Health Services Administration’s 

(SAMHSA) Center for Substance Abuse 

Prevention (CSAP). The DFC Program 

has two primary goals: To reduce youth 

substance abuse, and to support 

community anti-drug coalitions by 

establishing, strengthening, and 

fostering collaboration among public 

and private agencies. 

Under ONDCP’s reauthorization 

legislation (21 U.S.C. 1702), Congress 

mandated an evaluation of the DFC 

Program to determine its effectiveness 

in meeting objectives. In 2009, a 

contract was awarded to evaluate the 

DFC Program which used an existing 

web-based performance system, called 

the Coalition Online Management and 

Evaluation Tool (COMET) and the 

Coalition Classification Tool (CCT), to 

gather information from DFC grantees 

and SAMHSA CSAP’s Sober Truth on 

Preventing Underage Drinking 

Reauthorization Act (STOP Act) 

grantees. (STOP Act data collection is 

authorized and required by 42 U.S.C. 

290bb–35b and Section 519B of the 

Public Health Service Act). 

ONDCP awarded a contract for a DFC 

grant oversight system in January 2015 

following a competitive request for 

proposals process. Currently, DFC 

grantees interact with multiple separate 

systems. ONDCP’s new grant oversight 

system with a new data collection 

platform will replace the current 

COMET system. The development and 

implementation of the DFC grant 

oversight system will strengthen 

ONDCP’s oversight of the DFC Program. 

The data collected will have minimal 

changes compared to what is currently 

collected. The new system data 

collection tool will be more user 

friendly and reduce the burden on 

grantees. For FY 2015 grantees, awards 

anticipated mid-CY2015, ONDCP/DFC 

expects the new data collection system 

to be fully functional for DFC data 

collection and STOP Act data 

collection. 

ONDCP’s Drug-Free Communities 

office will continue to utilize the case 

study protocols previously approved by 

OMB to document coalition practices, 

successes and challenges. 

Approximately nine DFC grantees are 

selected each year to highlight in the 

case studies. The information from the 

case studies will be used to illustrate 

not only what works to reduce drug use 

in a community setting, but also how 

and why it works. 

ONDCP intends to use the data of the 

DFC National Evaluation to assess the 

DFC Program’s effectiveness in 

preventing and reducing youth 

substance use. Two primary objectives 

of the evaluation are to: (1) Regularly 

monitor, measure and analyze data in 

order to report on the progress of the 

DFC Program and its grantees on 

program goals, and (2) providing 

technical assistance support to DFC 

grantees in effectively collecting and 

submitting data and in understanding 

the role of data in driving local coalition 

efforts. 

The STOP Act program Evaluation 

will make use of the monitoring and 

tracking questionnaire to serve as a 

semi-annual report for STOP Act 

grantees and will provide information 

for SAMHSA, pursuant to SAMHSA 

authorities. 

Respondents: DFC current grantees 

and STOP Act grantees (includes both 

current and former DFC grantees). 

Type of Information Collection: Webbased data collection, surveys and 

interviews of DFC and Sober Truth on 

Preventing Underage Drinking (STOP) 

Act grantees. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

826. 

Estimated Number of Responses: 

2,189. 

Frequency of Response: Semiannually, annually and biennially. 

Progress reports semi-annually by DFC 

and STOP Act Program Directors via the 

new DFC Grant Oversight System, core 

measures biennially by DFC and STOP 

Act Program Directors via DFC Grant 

Oversight System and CCT annually for 

DFC Program Directors via DFC Grant 

Oversight System. Case study interviews 

of Program Directors and selected 

coalition members will be accomplished 

one time. ONDCP awarded a contract for 

the new data collection grant oversight 

system in January 2015. For FY 2015 

grantees, ONDCP/DFC expects the new 

data collection system to be fully 

functional for DFC data collection and 

STOP Act data collection. 

Average Hours per Response: Varies. 

ONDCP expects that the time required 

for DFC grantees to complete each semiannual progress report will be 

approximately five hours, and each CCT 

report will take approximately three 

hours to complete. Face to face 

interviews and focus groups with DFC 

grantees selected for site visits will take 

1.5–2 hours each to complete. STOP Act 

grantees and will also complete semiannual progress reports at an estimated 

five hours. The estimate of time for DFC 

and STOP Act grantees includes 

biennial core measure data submission. 

Total Estimated Burden: 9,052. 

(Comprehensive of all respondents over 

one year, including: DFC Program 

Directors and grantees to complete 

progress reports, CCT surveys, and 

interviews; and STOP Act grantees. 

ONDCP estimates that DFC grantees will 

spend approximately the same amount 

or less when using the new DFC data 

collection system). 

Solicitation of Public Comment 

No comments were received during 

the 60-day notice. This notice is 

soliciting comments from members of 

the public and affected parties 

concerning the collection of information 

described in Section A on the following: 

(1) Whether the proposed data are 

proper for the functions of the agency; 

(2) Whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

(3) The accuracy of ONDCP’s estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information, including the validity of 

the methodology and assumptions; 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 56 / Tuesday, March 24, 2015 / Notices 15643 

1Notice of United States Postal Service of Prices 

Under Functionally Equivalent International 

Business Reply Service Competitive Contract 3 

Negotiated Service Agreement, March 16, 2015 

(Notice). 

(4) Ways to enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and, ways to ease the 

burden on proposed respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology. 

ONDCP encourages interested parties 

to submit comments in response to 

these questions. 

Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. 

Dated: March 18, 2015. 

Daniel S. Rader, 

Deputy General Counsel. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06616 Filed 3–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3280–F5–P 

PEACE CORPS 

Information Collection Request; 

Submission for OMB Review 

AGENCY: Peace Corps. 

ACTION: 30-Day notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Peace Corps will be 

submitting the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval. The purpose of 

this notice is to allow 30 days for public 

comment in the Federal Register 

preceding submission to OMB. We are 

conducting this process in accordance 

with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 

1995 (44 USC Chapter 35). 

DATES: Submit comments on or before 

April 23, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name/or OMB approval 

number and should be sent via e-mail 

to: oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax 

to: 202–395–3086. Attention: Desk 

Officer for Peace Corps. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Denora Miller, FOIA/Privacy Act 

Officer, Peace Corps, 1111 20th Street, 

NW, Washington, DC 20526, (202) 692– 

1236, or email at pcfr@peacecorps.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Peace 

Corps, under Section 10(a)(4) of the 

Peace Corps Act, authorizes the Director 

to accept gifts of voluntary service, 

money, or property, for use in 

furtherance of the purposes of the Peace 

Corps Act. The information collected on 

the donation form is essential to 

fulfilling this authority and acceptance 

of gifts. 

OMB Control Number: 0420–XXXX. 

Title: Donation Form. 

Type of Review: New. 

Affected public: Individuals or 

households. 

Respondents’ obligation to reply: 

Voluntary. 

Burden to the public: 

(a) ........ Estimated number of respondents.13,000 

(b) ........ Frequency of response one 

time 

(c) ......... Estimated average burden per response.10 minutes 

(d) ........ Estimated total reporting 

burden.

2,167 

hours 

General Description of Collection: The 

information pulled from the donation 

form is used internally and on a daily 

basis by the Peace Corps Office of Gifts 

and Grants Management (GGM) to 

coordinate and oversee the development 

and implementation of partnerships to 

support the agency’s three goals and 

enhance programs through every stage 

of the Volunteer life cycle, 

communication with prospective and 

current donors. 

Request For Comment: Peace Corps 

invites comments on whether the 

proposed collections of information are 

necessary for proper performance of the 

functions of the Peace Corps, including 

whether the information will have 

practical use; the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the information 

to be collected; and, ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

automated collection techniques, when 

appropriate, and other forms of 

information technology. 

This notice issued in Washington, DC on 

March 17, 2015. 

Denora Miller, 

FOIA/Privacy Act Officer, Management. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06619 Filed 3–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6051–01–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. CP2013–78; Order No. 2400] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recent Postal Service filing concerning 

notice of contingency prices pursuant to 

an International Business Reply Service 

Competitive Contract 3 negotiated 

service agreement. This notice informs 

the public of the filing, invites public 

comment, and takes other 

administrative steps. 

DATES: Comments are due: March 25, 

2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit 

comments electronically should contact 

the person identified in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section by 

telephone for advice on filing 

alternatives. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 

202–789–6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Commission Action 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

On March 16, 2015, the Postal Service 

filed notice of contingency prices 

pursuant to an International Business 

Reply Service Competitive Contract 3 

(IBRS 3) negotiated service agreement 

(Agreement).1

To support its Notice, the Postal 

Service filed a copy of the notice of 

contingency prices sent to the 

contracting partner, a copy of the 

Governors’ Decision authorizing the 

product, a certification of compliance 

with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a), and an 

application for non-public treatment of 

certain materials. It also filed supporting 

financial workpapers. 

II. Notice of Commission Action 

The Commission establishes Docket 

No. CP2013–78 for consideration of 

matters raised by the Notice. 

The Commission invites comments on 

whether the Postal Service’s filing is 

consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 

3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and 39 CFR 

part 3020, subpart B. Comments are due 

no later than March 25, 2015. The 

public portions of the filing can be 

accessed via the Commission’s Web site 

(http://www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Curtis Kidd 

to serve as Public Representative in this 

docket. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

No. CP2013–78 for consideration of the 

matters raised by the Postal Service’s 

Notice. 

2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Curtis 

Kidd is appointed to serve as an officer 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES