alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014116EN.01000101.xml

| 16.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7104 — Crown Holdings/Mivisa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 116/01

On 14 March 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7104. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7104. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             907
<SECURITIES>                                    70,583
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                       249
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               125,606
<PP&E>                                          19,962
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,930
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,718
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,634
<BONDS>                                          1,580
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         33
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                     336,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,718
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,023
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,784
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,729)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         6
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,071)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,071)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of I-many, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of I-many, Inc., certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ JOHN A. RADE                                                                  
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President (principal executive officer)     
|                                                                                  
|November 9, 2007                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|/s/ KEVIN M. HARRIS                                                               
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer)
|                                                                                  
|November 9, 2007
# C_2015354EN.01000101.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 354/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 346, 19.10.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 337, 12.10.2015

OJ C 328, 5.10.2015

OJ C 320, 28.9.2015

OJ C 311, 21.9.2015

OJ C 302, 14.9.2015

OJ C 294, 7.9.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
procedurally barred absent a demonstration of good cause and actual 

prejudice. See NRS 34.726(1); NRS 34.810(3). 

Appellant claimed the procedural bars did not apply because 

he had been pursuing post-conviction relief in Nevada state court and in 

federal court since he was convicted. Appellant also asserted that he was 

exhausting state grounds so that he can proceed in federal court. That 

appellant filed a previous state petition and filed a petition in federal 

court did not demonstrate that an impediment external to the defense 

should excuse the procedural bars. See Hathaway v. State, 119 Nev. 248, 

252, 71 P.3d 503, 506 (2003). Further, exhaustion of state remedies in 

order to seek federal court review was insufficient to demonstrate cause to 

excuse the delay. See Colley v. State, 105 Nev. 235, 236, 773 P.2d 1229, 

1230 (1989). Therefore, the district court did not err in dismissing the 

petition as procedurally barred. Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 4 

4We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A (- 

2 

i M-W-MY 
cc: Hon. Janet J. Berry, District Judge 

Matthew Arthur Fields 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3 

-,i5vsoigums , - 71,„W1117:
EXHIBIT 11

                           IGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   (Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
(thousands, except share and per share information)                        Three months ended
                                                                  March 31, 1999          March 31, 1998
                                                                  --------------          --------------
<S>                                                                <C>                     <C>
Net income (loss) for earnings per share                           $      (319)            $      (203)
                                                                   ===========             ===========

Weighted average shares outstanding                                  9,519,266               9,466,667

  Common stock equivalents (net of common stock
    deemed reacquired) based on average market price                        --                      --
                                                                   -----------             -----------

Total equivalent shares for diluted computation                      9,519,266               9,466,667
                                                                   ===========             ===========

Per Share Income (loss):
  Basic                                                            $     (0.03)            $     (0.02)
  Diluted                                                          $     (0.03)            $     (0.02)
</TABLE>


                                                                              19
REF ID:A66530 ~. 

COltflBYMl :,L;;;dRttY lNFSRMAilOH 

.. 'A • g u ... 

IU&JOOTa Pd>licat.1.oA of Jlatorl.al contdMd 1n 

Unclusl ti.er! USA Teohnical booUl!ISilt 

IOa Cld.ot• TnWd.ng D1Y. P'BOM.1 Cmm4taat 16 Jv.no 19S2 COMMEl'l' JO,. T 

tHR1J I Ch1.ef Gt St.aft 

1. So tu u I a -.re. 'there ie no USCIB palioy or Department. ot Defense 

ftSUlatlao that .tol'bl4a tbe uaoluat.n.ed usooiatlon o~ • 1J3d.ividual 111.th the 

•.t.ftlad roroes Securi v U,Cq •" or iltli "arq ot the Senice OrJrptoloiic Apric1es. 

Xt 1• P"'U'ble that, the id-. that - 1Dd1Y:S.dWll'• DIUIG ll\Mlt. not be ueociated. 

141'.h the Mao ot 'tbo A&en:¥ atcla traa ibe USCIB .rule that tb.e D1U1D ot the APnoy 

wt DO\ be ueoaiated t.d. th Cl"JP~C attain. U.,-~if tba author ot a 

-.plet.1.7 Ullela.ald a.s artiol• not. deal.1.ng td.th ~~ atfairs 1d.she• t;0 

._, hi• uiloataton iltb tm J.ralcl Farces Secari y, i tn1nk ho abou.14 

- pemi.tt.l to do •• 

I• "1th ft&Qd to tihe point Jade 1zL ........ 2a ot Oollmfllt. No. 5,, ihia 1a & 

st.er tor c:ont4m1.·b1g "1.ctlance and alertness t.o rd.n'"' • (not to pNYant, 

became ;you cannot) aLlch oanosia to ov eum1••· -vitli Jiiprd 1o ihe poin~ 

.SO 1n pan.. 2b ot Ccmnmt No. ?1 1.t 1'ollolled to ita logical oonclusicm, th1a 

wtQd ann outtJJw ua oft troa au contact and heal.tJ\}" exchange 0£ 1deaa w1t.h 

tbe 1'9Dt QE the tecbniCaJ. wrld. 

),. I t..i that it 1a U1og1ca1 and a ld.ltt.ako to 9tl'etch th.a intent ot a ~t.lon or polJ.c7 to tbe ext.mt tb.at it 1IUl 1n th• lcmg run, constt.tut.e 

a 49trJ.mnt. t.o .AFSA llld the nate 0£ morale at !t3 technlcal. peraonne.l. 

COHA9£NTJAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
# CA2015394EN.01000101.xml

| 27.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 394/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 394/1

---

NOTIFICATION OF VACANCY NOTICE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR (GRADE AD 14) OF EUROJUST

The Hague (the Netherlands) — 15/EJ/04

(2015/C 394 A/01)

Eurojust invites applications for the position of Administrative Director of Eurojust. Eurojust was established in 2002 to enhance the effectiveness of the Member States’ competent authorities to deal with serious cross-border and organised crime. Eurojust is formed by a College of prosecutors, judges or police officers who are responsible for its organisation and operation. The Administrative Director is responsible, under the supervision of the President of the College, for the day-to-day administration of Eurojust and for staff management. Please consult our website for the detailed vacancy notice and procedure for application:

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/careers/vacancies/Pages/Vacancies.aspx

The deadline for submission of applications is 31 January 2016 at midnight CET.

---
**EXHIBIT 15**

To   the Board of Directors and Shareholder ofAllstate Life Insurance Company:

Wehave made a review, in accordance with the standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), of the unaudited interim financialinformation of Allstate Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries for thethree-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, as indicated inour report dated August 4, 2006; because we did not perform an audit, weexpressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, whichis included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June30, 2006, is incorporated by reference in the following RegistrationStatements:
| Form S-3 Registration Statement Nos. | ** ** | **Form N-4 Registration Statement Nos.** |
|--------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------|
| 333-100068                           |       | 333-102934                               |
| 333-102319                           |       | 333-114560                               |
| 333-102325                           |       | 333-114561                               |
| 333-104789                           |       | 333-114562                               |
| 333-105331                           |       | 333-121691                               |
| 333-112233                           |       | 333-121693                               |
| 333-112249                           |       |                                     |
| 333-117685                           |       |                                     |
| 333-119296                           |       |                                     |
| 333-119706                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121739                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121741                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121742                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121745                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121811                           |       |                                     |
| 333-121812                           |       |                                     |
| 333-123847                           |       |                                     |
| 333-125937                           |       |                                     |
| 333-129157                           |       |                                     |

 

Wealso are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) underthe Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the RegistrationStatement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared orcertified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago, Illinois

August 4, 2006

 

E-3

----
# C_2015346EN.01000101.xml

| 19.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 346/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 346/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 346/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 337, 12.10.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 328, 5.10.2015

OJ C 320, 28.9.2015

OJ C 311, 21.9.2015

OJ C 302, 14.9.2015

OJ C 294, 7.9.2015

OJ C 279, 24.8.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**Exhibit 12.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Roger A. Leopard, President for CalciTech Ltd., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Transition Report on Form 20-F of CalciTech Ltd. for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2006 (“Transition Report”);2. Based on my knowledge, this Transition Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Transition Report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Transition Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis Transition Report;4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Omitted;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated:  May 31, 2007 /s/ Roger A. Leopard   Roger A. Leopard, President   (Principal Executive Officer)
#### Krall vs. Lull.

SupREme Court. *(1) How long this court retains jurisdiction of appeal. (2) Replacing appeal on calender after affirmance under the rule.*

1. This court retains jurisdiction of an appeal during the time limited by the statute (R. S., sec. 8071) during which the record remains here after judgment rendered here, even though the term of judgment has expired.

2. After an affirmance under the rule, for nonappearance of the appellant, a motion made within the sixty days to replace the appeal on the calendar, is granted on terms (as being in the nature of a motion for a rehearing, *Bonin v. Railway Co.,*43 Wis., 210), on its being shown'that the failure to appear arose Rom a misunderstanding between the counsel of the respective parties.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Winnebago*County.

*O. D.*Cleveland, for the motion.

*S. IT. Pinney, contra.*

Ryan, C. J.

This appeal, being on the calendar of last term, was affirmed under the rule, for nonappearance of the appellant.

The appellant makes this motion at this term, within sixty days after the affirmance (R. S., § 3071), in the nature of a motion for a rehearing *(Bonin v. Railway Co.,*43 Wis., 210), to reinstate the appeal.

The failure of the appellant to prepare for the hearing of the appeal was manifestly owing to a misunderstanding between the counsel of the respective parties. And the appellant ought to be relieved on terms, if he can he.

The question is, whether the statute authorizing the record to be retained here for sixty days, continues the jurisdiction of the court over the appeal after the term of judgment. This precise question has never been decided.

Without the statute, the jurisdiction of the court over the appeal would undoubtedly expire with the term of judgment. But the manifest object of the statute is to preserve the jur*644isdiction of the court for the time limited, whether or not the term of judgment expire within it. The mere fact that the record remains here would not continue j urisdiction over it. But while it remains here under and by force of the statute, it remains subject to the jurisdiction of the court. *Pringle v. Dunn,*39 Wis., 435.

*By the Court.*—The motion is granted on terms.
NO. SCPW-12-0000799

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

MICHAEL C. TIERNEY, Petitioner,

vs.

TED SAKAI, INTERIM DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, STATE

OF HAWAI#I; SHARI KIMOTO; and JEANETTE BALTERO, Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.

with Acoba, J., dissenting)

Upon consideration of petitioner Michael C. Tierney’s

motion for reconsideration of the October 9, 2012 order denying

his petition for a writ of mandamus, which was electronically

filed by the appellate clerk on November 2, 2012, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 14, 2012.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-12-0000799

14-NOV-2012

08:07 AM
DISSENT BY ACOBA, J.

I dissent and would grant the motion for

reconsideration because HRS § 353H-7 evinces a mandatory request.

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

2
Exhibit 32.2

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Yu, Co-President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2009 and results of operations of the Company for the
three months ended September 30, 2009.



/s/ Carol YuCarol Yu, Co-President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 6, 2009
<PAGE>

                                                             EXHIBIT NUMBER 23.1
                                                             -------------------



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement of
Information Management Resources, Inc. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-24027) of our
report dated February 13, 1998, except for the information in Note 22, for which
the date is March 9, 1998, on our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of Information Management Resources, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996 and for the years ended December 31, 1997, 1996 and
1995, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


                                                     Coopers & Lybrand, L.L.P.



Tampa, Florida
March 27, 1998