alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Silamar Estates, Inc., a Domestic Corporation, Landlord, *v.*Saul M. Bien, Tenant.

Municipal Court of New York, Borough of Manhattan, Fifth District,

December 2, 1937.

*Mantón Marks,*for the landlord.

*Sidney W. Stein,*for the tenant.

Wilson, J.

This is a summary proceeding brought for the recovery of possession of premises because of failure to pay rent. The tenant sets up the defense that this property has been turned into a multiple dwelling and that the landlord has no right to this proceeding because no certificate of occupancy was issued to the landlord.

Section 301 of the Multiple Dwelling Law, under-heading “ Certificate of Compliance,” states therein: “No building hereafter constructed as or altered or converted into a multiple dwelling shall be occupied in whole or in part for human habitation until the issuance of a certificate by the department charged with the enforcement of this chapter that said building conforms in all respects to the requirements of this chapter.”

Section 302 of the Multiple Dwelling Law, under the title “ Unlawful Occupation,” subdivision 1 thereof, contains the following: “ If any building be occupied in whole or in part for human habita*240tion in violation of the last section, during such unlawful occupation any bond or note secured by a mortgage upon said building, or the lot upon which it stands, may be declared due at the option of the mortgagee. No rent shall be recovered by the owner or lessee of such premises for said period, and no action or special proceeding shall be mantained therefor, or for the possession of said premises for non-payment of such rent.”

Under the facts as presented at the trial herein and the Multiple Dwelling Law, I am, after careful consideration, constrained to dismiss this proceeding and it is so ordered.
# C_2015413EN.01000401.xml

| 12.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 413/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 413/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 December 2015

(2015/C 413/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0950 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,02 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4609 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3007 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0819 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5385 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,023 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 316,66 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3456 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5248 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,2416 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5180 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4962 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4868 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6258 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5436 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 300,93 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 17,3954 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0716 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6390 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 441,30 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7424 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,960 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 76,3280 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,519 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2190 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,9987 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,3719 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0950

JPY

Japanese yen

133,02

DKK

Danish krone

7,4609

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72240

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3007

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0819

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5385

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,023

HUF

Hungarian forint

316,66

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3456

RON

Romanian leu

4,5248

TRY

Turkish lira

3,2416

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5180

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4962

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4868

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6258

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5436

KRW

South Korean won

1 300,93

ZAR

South African rand

17,3954

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0716

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6390

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 441,30

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7424

PHP

Philippine peso

51,960

RUB

Russian rouble

76,3280

THB

Thai baht

39,519

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2190

MXN

Mexican peso

18,9987

INR

Indian rupee

73,3719

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 99.2




                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly  report of ACCESSPOINT  CORPORATION on
Form  10 QSB for the  period  ended  September  30,  2002,  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,
                  in  all  material  respects,  the financial condition and
                  results of operation of the Company.



Date:  November 18, 2002                    /s/ WILLIAM R. BARBER
                                            ___________________________
                                            William R. Barber
                                            Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

MARY JANE SCHNEIDER,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES' 

RETIREMENT BOARD,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 309 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal and Petition for Leave to Append the Text of the Statute are DENIED.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Alex Hernandez,

 Appellant,

v.

US Bank Trust NA as Trustee for LSF8 

Master Participation Trust,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00290-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2016-CCV00265)

O R D E R

On November 21, 2016 this Court issued an order for mediation referral. The order 

required the parties to make any objection to referral within ten days of the order. On November

28, 2016 Appellee timely filed an objection. The Court finds Appellee’s objection persuasive.

Therefore the Court ORDERS this appeal to continue, the appellate timetable suspension 

is lifted and the Appellant’s brief is due in this Court on or before December 28, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of November, 2016.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Hughes, JJ.
# C_2016023EN.01000301.xml

| 22.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 23/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 23/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 January 2016

(2016/C 23/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0893 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,43 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4630 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77182 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3527 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0949 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,7033 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,064 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,42 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4943 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5316 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3098 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5755 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5750 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5181 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6940 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5670 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 321,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,1453 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1666 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6710 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 149,99 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7818 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,166 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 91,7660 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,503 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5230 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,2120 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,0684 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0893

JPY

Japanese yen

127,43

DKK

Danish krone

7,4630

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77182

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3527

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0949

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,7033

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,064

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,42

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4943

RON

Romanian leu

4,5316

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3098

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5755

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5750

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5181

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6940

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5670

KRW

South Korean won

1 321,64

ZAR

South African rand

18,1453

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1666

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6710

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 149,99

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7818

PHP

Philippine peso

52,166

RUB

Russian rouble

91,7660

THB

Thai baht

39,503

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5230

MXN

Mexican peso

20,2120

INR

Indian rupee

74,0684

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015240EN.01000201.xml

| 22.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 July 2015

(2015/C 240/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0867 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4618 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69870 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3683 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0440 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9165 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,072 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,00 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1138 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4175 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9222 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4746 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4118 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4229 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6460 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4841 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 252,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4696 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7479 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5920 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 535,28 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1309 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,119 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,9215 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,469 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4680 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3622 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,1250 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0867

JPY

Japanese yen

135,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4618

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69870

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3683

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0440

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9165

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,072

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,00

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1138

RON

Romanian leu

4,4175

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9222

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4746

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4118

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4229

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6460

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4841

KRW

South Korean won

1 252,96

ZAR

South African rand

13,4696

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7479

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5920

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 535,28

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1309

PHP

Philippine peso

49,119

RUB

Russian rouble

61,9215

THB

Thai baht

37,469

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4680

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3622

INR

Indian rupee

69,1250

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014225EN.01000101.xml

| 16.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 225/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 225/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7301 — PAI Partners/Euro Media Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 225/01)

On 8 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7301. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7301. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

DONALD BETHEA,

Petitioner

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

COMMON PLEAS COURT OF 

PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S 

OFFICE OF PHILADELPHIA, COURT 

REPORTER AND INTERPRETER ADM.,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 150 EM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2016, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Prohibition and/or Alternative 

Mandamus, the Application for Waiver and Modification of Rules, and the “Motion to 

Remove Constitutional [sic] Deficient Assistance of Counsel From Obstruction and 

Impeding Disclosure of Discovery on PCRA Collateral Review Appeal Permanently” are 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 7, 2006


By: /s/ /s/ ac
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. ("Company") Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 ("Report"), the undersigned
certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: July 7, 2006


By: /s/ Debi Kokinos
--------------------
Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
## Notice of Receipt of a Clean Air Act Waiver Application to Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of

Gasoline to 15 Percent

– Meeting Notice Date EPA Attendees Name of Organization Summary of Discussion 10 / 05 /2010 Joel Ball

Ball.joel@epa.gov Jim Snyder Snyder.jim@epa.gov Antonio Fernandez fernandez.fernandez@epa.gov Mary Manners manners.mary@epa.gov Robert Anderson (by telephone) anderson.robert@epa.gov Representative from the Renewable Fuels Association (RFA), Illinois Corn Growers Association (ICGA), and Ricardo met with EPA

. Attendees included Kristy Moore from RFA, Dave Loos from ICGA, and Rod Beazley, Rod Harris and Luke Cruff from Ricardo. RFA , ICGA and Ricardo discussed their support for the E15 waiver to be granted for introduction into commerce for all motor vehicle s. Discussion focused on Ricardo’s recently submitted report for vehicles MY1994

- 2000 (see Docket No. ID EPA

- HQ

OAR

- 2009

- 0211

- 14007)

.
**From:** Jim Tozzi [ mailto:btozzi1@cox.net ]

**Sent:** Thursday, April 16, 2015 12:25 PM **To:** Page, Steve; Culligan, Kevin **Subject:** DOE Role in EPA's Proposed Regulation for New Coal Fired Plants

Gentlemen:

The Department of Energy spends billions on the development emission control technologies. It is important that they participate actively in the formulation of EPA’s NSPS for new coal fired plants. DOE participation in the rulemaking is virtually guaranteed if EPA were to conduct a peer review in accordance with the requirements of the Data Quality Act. Failure to conduct such a peer review could result in the execution of the legal strategy contained herein which provides a method for challenging a propo sed rule because of non

- compliance with the peer review requirements specific to the Data Quality Act. The strategy is a result of a legal precedent established in the TRAC litigation. A court is authorized to act before a final rule is issued when t he public has been denied the opportunity to utilize the results of a DQA peer review in developing their comments on a proposed rule. A judicial intervention is warranted to protect the right of the public to influence the contents of a final rule.
Please see the attachment hereto. Respectfully,
Jim Tozzi
Center for Regulatory Effectiveness
# C_2015356EN.01000701.xml

| 28.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 356/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

To celebrate 30 years of the EU flag, euro-area Finance Ministers decided that euro-area Member States would strike a 2-euro commemorative coin using a common design on the national side. Euro-area citizens and residents have selected by public web-voting the winning design. Voters had a choice of five designs, which had been pre-selected by a professional jury following a design competition among European Mints, and they choose the design created by Mr Georgios Stamatopoulos, professional designer at the Bank of Greece.

Issuing country
  : Estonia

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 30th anniversary of the EU flag

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows the EU flag as a symbol that unites people and cultures with shared visions and ideals for a better common future. Twelve stars that morph into human figures are embracing the birth of a new Europe. At the top right, in semi-circle, are the issuing country ‘EESTI’ and the years ‘1985-2015’. At the bottom right are the initials of the artist (Georgios Stamatopoulos).

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : November 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 20, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-41106

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ERNESTO ALVARADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:03-CR-58-2

--------------------

Before JOLLY, JONES, and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Ernesto Alvarado appeals his sentence following a guilty

plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine. See

21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A). Alvarado challenges the

district court’s finding that he did not meet the requirement of

the “safety valve” provision, U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5), that he

truthfully provide the Government with all information and

evidence he had concerning the offense. Because Alvarado was

found not credible, the district court did not err in finding
No. 03-41106

-2-

that Alvarado did not meet the safety valve criteria in U.S.S.G.

§ 5C1.2 which would qualify him for a two-level downward

adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(6). See United States

v. Solis, 169 F.3d 224, 226 (5th Cir. 1999); United States v.

Flanagan, 80 F.3d 143, 145-47 (5th Cir. 1996).

AFFIRMED.