alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016235EN.01000401.xml

| 29.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.8057 — Cinven/CPPIB/Hotelbeds Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 235/04)

On 21 June 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8057. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M8057. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2652 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2652

      To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 
   congressional intent and preserve patient access to home infusion 
      therapy under the Medicare program, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2021

Mr. Warner (for himself and Mr. Scott of South Carolina) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
      To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify 
   congressional intent and preserve patient access to home infusion 
      therapy under the Medicare program, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preserving Patient Access to Home 
Infusion Act''.

SEC. 2. PRESERVATION OF PATIENT ACCESS TO HOME INFUSION THERAPY UNDER 
              MEDICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) Inclusion of Pharmacy Services.--Section 1861(iii)(2)(A) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(iii)(2)(A)) is amended by 
inserting ``and pharmacy services'' after ``nursing services''.
    (b) Infusion Drug Administration Calendar Day.--Section 
1834(u)(1)(A)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
1395m(u)(1)(A)(ii)) is amended by inserting after the first sentence 
the following new sentence: ``For purposes of the previous sentence, 
with respect to the furnishing of home infusion drugs to an individual 
by a qualified home infusion therapy supplier, a reference to payment 
to such supplier for an infusion drug administration calendar day in 
the home of such individual shall refer to payment for the date on 
which such a drug was administered to the individual (regardless of 
whether a qualified home infusion therapy supplier was physically 
present in the home of such individual on such date).''.
    (c) Permitting Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants To 
Establish and Review a Home Infusion Plan of Care.--Section 
1861(iii)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(iii)(1)(B)) 
is amended by striking ``physician (as defined in subsection (r)(1)) 
and is periodically reviewed by a physician'' and inserting ``physician 
(as defined in subsection (r)(1)) or a nurse practitioner or physician 
assistant (as those terms are defined in subsection (aa)(5)) and is 
periodically reviewed by a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician 
assistant''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to items and services furnished on or after January 
1, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 23, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-1174

Lower Tribunal No. 12-8535

________________

The State of Florida,

Petitioner,

vs.

Karon Gaiter,

Respondent.

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade

County, Milton Hirsch, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Timothy A. Freeland, Assistant

Attorney General, and Carol M. Dittmar (Tampa), Senior Assistant Attorney

General, for petitioner.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public

Defender, for respondent.

Before ROTHENBERG, LOGUE, and SCALES, JJ.

LOGUE, J.
The State of Florida filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to review a

pretrial decision declaring Florida’s new death penalty statute, § 921.141(1),

Florida Statutes (2016), unconstitutional. We have jurisdiction.1 After the petition

was filed, the Florida Supreme Court held the statute was rendered unconstitutional

because it failed to require a unanimous jury recommendation of death. In doing

so, the Court explained, “[a]lthough the United States Supreme Court has not ruled

on whether unanimity is required in the jury’s advisory verdict in capital cases, the

foundational precept of the Eighth Amendment calls for unanimity in any death

recommendation that results in a sentence of death.” Hurst v. State, No. SC12-

1947, 2016 WL 6036978, at *15 (Fla. Oct. 14, 2016); See Perry v. State, No.

SC16-547, 2016 WL 6036982, at *8 (Fla. Oct. 14, 2016) (“we resolve any

ambiguity in the Act consistent with our decision in Hurst”).

Certiorari denied.

1 See, e.g., State v. Pettis, 520 So. 2d 250, 253 (Fla. 1988) (noting that the

filing of a petition for writ of certiorari is an apt remedy where the application of

double jeopardy would prevent the State from obtaining review of an interlocutory

trial court order that departed from the essential requirements of the law and

frustrated the proper prosecution of a crime).

2
# C_2016020EN.01000101.xml

| 21.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 January 2016

(2016/C 20/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0907 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,28 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4638 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77000 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3431 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0932 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,6650 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,042 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,76 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,4702 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5326 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3307 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5916 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5965 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5366 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7134 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5697 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 326,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 18,2896 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1768 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6670 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 228,20 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7936 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,219 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 88,2005 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,582 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4559 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 20,0427 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,1627 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0907

JPY

Japanese yen

127,28

DKK

Danish krone

7,4638

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77000

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3431

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0932

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,6650

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,042

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,76

PLN

Polish zloty

4,4702

RON

Romanian leu

4,5326

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3307

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5916

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5965

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5366

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7134

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5697

KRW

South Korean won

1 326,46

ZAR

South African rand

18,2896

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1768

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6670

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 228,20

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7936

PHP

Philippine peso

52,219

RUB

Russian rouble

88,2005

THB

Thai baht

39,582

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4559

MXN

Mexican peso

20,0427

INR

Indian rupee

74,1627

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 99.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly  report of ACCESSPOINT  CORPORATION on
Form  10 QSB for the  period  ended  September  30,  2002,  as  filed  with  the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  each of
the  undersigned,  in the capacities and on the dates  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The  information  contained  in the  report  fairly  presents,
                  in  all  material  respects,  the financial condition and
                  results of operation of the Company.



Date:  November 18, 2002                    /s/ WILLIAM R. BARBER
                                            ___________________________
                                            William R. Barber
                                            Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending
      September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by
      LaserLock Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Norman A. Gardner, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.  The
      Report fully complied with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





November
      14, 2008





/s/
                Norman A. GardnerNorman
                A. GardnerChief
                Executive OfficerChief
                Financial Officer





This
      certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
      and furnished to the Securities Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Explanatory
      Note: The same individual serves as chief executive (principal) officer and
      principal financial officer. Accordingly, there are no other individuals who
      are
“other certifying officers” referred to in this certification.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2384

_____________________________
R ICHARD B RYSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for D uval County

. Bruce Anderson , Judge

. October 3, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). The order appealed was rendered upon being filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal on May 1, 2018. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(i).

W OLF , K ELSEY , a nd J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Richard Bryson, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General , Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
# C_2015229EN.01001501.xml

| 14.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/15

---

Corrigendum to the call for proposals under the multiannual work programme for granting financial aid in the field of the trans-European energy infrastructure under the Connecting Europe Facility for period 2014-2020 (Commission Decision C(2015) 1363)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 214 of 30 June 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 214 of 30 June 2015

(2015/C 229/12)

On page 10, the deadline for the submission of proposals is amended as follows:

for:

‘The deadline for the submission of proposals is 30 September 2015.’,

read:

‘The deadline for the submission of proposals is 14 October 2015.’.

---
# C_2015269EN.01000301.xml

| 15.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7698 — ManpowerGroup/7S Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 269/05)

On 6 August 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7698. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7698. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 256 

To provide funding for humanitarian relief at the southern border of the 

United States. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. HEINRICH (for himself, Mr. CORNYN, and Mr. LUJA ́N) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide funding for humanitarian relief at the southern 

border of the United States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Southern Border Com5 munities Reimbursement Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FUNDING FOR HUMANITARIAN RELIEF AT THE BOR7 DER. 

8 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is 

9 authorized to be appropriated for the emergency food and 

10 shelter program under title III of the McKinney-Vento 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 256 IS

1 Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11331 et seq.), for 

2 use only under subsection (b) of this section, $30,000,000 

3 for each of fiscal years 2021, 2022, and 2023. 

4 (b) USE.— 

5 (1) ELIGIBLE COSTS.—Amounts made available 

6 under subsection (a) may be used only to reimburse 

7 costs related to providing humanitarian relief to 

8 aliens, including the cost of emergency preparedness 

9 activities. 

10 (2) DISBURSEMENT DEADLINE.—Notwith11 standing sections 315 and 316(b) of the McKinney12 Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11345, 

13 11346(b)), the Emergency Food and Shelter Pro14 gram National Board shall begin disbursing the 

15 amounts made available under subsection (a) of this 

16 section not later than 60 days after the date on 

17 which the amounts become available. 

18 (3) DISTRIBUTION.—Of the amounts made 

19 available for a fiscal year under subsection (a), the 

20 Emergency Food and Shelter Program National 

21 Board shall distribute— 

22 (A) $25,000,000 to jurisdictions or local 

23 recipient organizations serving communities in 

24 the States of Arizona, California, New Mexico, 

25 and Texas; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 256 IS

1 (B) $5,000,000 to jurisdictions or local re2 cipient organizations serving communities in 

3 States not located along the international bor4 der between the United States and Mexico. 

5 (4) ELIGIBLE PERIOD.—Amounts made avail6 able under subsection (a) may be used to reimburse 

7 jurisdictions or local recipient organizations de8 scribed in paragraph (3) of this subsection only for 

9 costs incurred on or after October 1, 2020. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2016069EN.01000102.xml

| 23.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 69/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 69/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7913 — Allianz/Spar/Fischapark)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 69/02)

On 18 February 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7913. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7913. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Brian R. McDonald, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated, a Delawarecorporation, for the second quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Intentionally omitted pursuantto SEC rules] 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 3, 2006