alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 21


                        Subsidiaries of the Registrants

                            As of December 31, 1998



ORBCOMM Global, L.P.

1.   ORBCOMM USA. L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
2.   ORBCOMM International Partners, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
3.   ORBCOMM Global Capital Corp., a Delaware corporation
4.   ORBCOMM Corporation, a Delaware corporation
5.   Dolphin Information Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
6.   Dolphin Software Services ULC, a Nova Scotia unlimited liability company


ORBCOMM Global Capital Corp.

None.

ORBCOMM Corporation

None.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
D. Wesselink, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  2.       The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ David D. Wesselink
                                            ----------------------
                                            David D. Wesselink
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
                                            April 9, 2004
Order entered October 8, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01168
- CR
EX PARTE LARRY JAMES BUDOW On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 9

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. MC18
- A1502



### O RDER
The Court is in r e ce ipt of a pp e l l a nt’s not i c e of a p p ea l f r om the tri a l c ourt ’ s ord e r denying

r e l i e f sou g ht b y his a ppl i ca t i on for w r it of h a b e a s c orpus. This is a n ac c e le ra t e d a pp e a l and is
g ov e rn e d b y T e x a s R ule of App e l l a te P r o c e dure 3 1.
W e ORDER the tri a l c ourt to pr e p a r e a c e rtifi ca t ion of a pp e l l a nt’s r i g ht to a pp ea l a nd
file it with the clerk’s record. S e e T E X

. R

. A PP

. P

. 25.2 (a ), ( d ); Cortez v . Sta t e , 420 S

. W .3d 803 ( T e x . Crim. App. 2013 )

. W e ORDER the D a l l a s Coun t y Cle r k to file the c le r k’s r e c o rd b y October 24,
2018

. We ORDER that the clerk’s record contain copies of the indictment, the trial court’s judgment, the application for writ of habeas corpus, the State’s response to the writ application,
any other documents filed in connection with the application for writ of habeas corpus, the trial court’s order adjudicating the writ application, the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court’s certification of appellant’s ri ght to appeal.– 2

–

After reviewing the notice of appeal, the Court questions whether it has jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant represents that the trial court entered its order denying his writ application on May 31, 2018. Appellant filed his notice of appeal on October 4, 2018. Appellant filed a motion to extend the time to file the notice of appeal on October 1, 2018. Under the rules of appellate procedure, both the notice of appeal and the motion to extend are untimely. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2

– 3; Campbell v. State , 320 S.W.3d 338, 339 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010); Olivo v.
State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996). To assist the Court in making a threshold determination of its jurisdiction, appellant is
DIRECTED to file, by October 24, 2018 , a letter brief addressing the jurisdictional issue. The
State is DIRECTED to file any response by November 8, 2018 . After it has reviewed the jurisdictional briefs, the Court will consider appellant’s motion to extend and either dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction or else enter further orders setting additional deadlines. Until the Court makes a determination of its jurisdiction, the Court will not order the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record, if any.
W e DI R ECT the Cl e rk to s e nd c opies of th i s ord e r to the Hono ra b l e Peggy Hoffman , P r e sid i ng J ud g e , County Criminal Court No. 9 ; Sandi Morelan , o f f ici a l c ourt r e port e r, County
Criminal Court No. 9 ; John F. Warren , Dallas C ou n t y C le r k; Larry James Budow, pro se appellant; and c ouns e l for the S tate

. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Order entered April 5, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00375-CV

THE CITY OF IRVING, TEXAS, Appellant

V.

LAS COLINAS GROUP, LP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-8748

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s March 19, 2013 petition for leave to file interlocutory 

appeal and appellee’s March 29, 2013 cross-petition for leave to file interlocutory appeal. The 

Court GRANTS the petition and cross-petition. We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a 

copy of this order to the Dallas County District Clerk, Gary Fitzsimmons.

/s/ MICHAEL J. O'NEILL 

JUSTICE
# C_2015197EN.01000101.xml

| 13.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 197/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7617 — Feralpi Siderurgica/Duferco Italia/Lucchini SpA in A.S. Going Concern Wire Rods Business/Servola SpA in A.S. Certain Assets)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 197/01)

On 5 June 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7617. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7617. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15793-15794]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which

[[Page 15794]]

would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of 
Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel; Long-term 
health impacts of maternal obesity and gestational diabetes on the 
offspring: A trans-generational study.
    Date: April 8, 2015.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate contract proposals.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call).
    Contact Person: Sathasiva B. Kandasamy, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 5B01, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6680, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#daa9b1bbb4bebba9bb9ab7bbb3b6f4b4b3b2f4bdb5ac"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="0a79616b646e6b796b4a676b636624646362246d657c">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 19, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-06842 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I-many, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, A. Leigh Powell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin M. Harris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       | 
|---------------------- | 
|Dated: August 13, 2003 | 
|                       | 
|                       | 
|                       | 
|Dated: August 13, 2003 | 
|                       | 
|                       | 



A signed original of this written
statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
. 

I . ...REJ? 1t' \.,\ ID :~~0957; 

f 1.J"'_,; ~ /I "."' '• 

,; .:I.!... ~--

\ 

19 Feb 47 

MEMO TO: Chief, AS-81. 

Following is esti!ila.te of cost or iteir.s on Project #61 which it 

is anticipated will have to be purchased frora funds provi~ed for the 

project: 

-. 

~"" .Y!!!i= Unit Cost: Quantitl: Total cost: 

-

J 

lb .62 1225 759.50 

(lb) (.55} (1225} (673.75} 

Sold~r: #10 wire, 50-50 tin-lead content 

2'5, lb spool; "Dutch Boy" or equal 

\ (40-60} 

Contaib~rs: Metal ea 2.50 3150 7875.00 

' 

ea 5.90 3150 18585.00 \ 

Cont8:~r~: Wood 

2721'7'~ .I 

The following considerations should be made in plying the above figure 

against the original astir.late. ,... ..... ~ ~' 

a. Padding will probably have to be purchased. An estirtate 

has not yet been obtained but it could easily run as high as $3000.00 

b. Cer.i.ent will probably be available in stocks but in the 

event it is· not the total cost will not run more than $150.00 

(§? 

PG PLATNER 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

!1#f7
# C_2015255EN.01000201.xml

| 4.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/2

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 255/02)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : The Vatican City State

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The VIII World Meeting of Families

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design depicts two families which ideally embrace the whole Earth. At the top, the year of issuance ‘2015’. At the left side, the name of the artist ‘C. Principe’. The mint mark R appears on the arm of one family member at the right. The design is surrounded by the inscription ‘VIII INCONTRO MONDIALE DELLE FAMIGLIE’ (The VIII World Meeting of Families), from the left to the right in semi-circle and ‘CITTA' DEL VATICANO’ at the bottom.

Description of the design

The coin's outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : October 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7292

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CLAUDE WENDELL BELLAMY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (7:99-cr-00049-F-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Claude Wendell Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. G. Norman Acker, III, 

Assistant United States Attorney, John Samuel Bowler, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Claude Wendell Bellamy seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Bellamy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal.

Additionally, we construe Bellamy’s notice of appeal and 

informal brief as an application to file a second or successive 

§ 2255 motion. United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d 200, 208 (4th 
3

Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file a successive 

§ 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on either:

(1) newly discovered evidence that . . . would be 

sufficient to establish by clear and convincing evidence 

that no reasonable factfinder would have found the 

movant guilty of the offense; or

(2) a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive 

to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that 

was previously unavailable.

28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Bellamy’s claims do not satisfy either of 

these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a 

successive § 2255 motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

RUSSELL GREEN, * No. 16-612V

* Special Master Christian J. Moran

Petitioner, *

v. * Filed: November 2, 2016

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine;

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * transverse myelitis. 

*

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Howard Scott Gold, Gold Law Firm, Wellesley Hills, MA, for Petitioner;

Kathryn A. Robinette, U.S. Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION1

On November 2, 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the 

petition for compensation filed by Russell Green on May 24, 2016. In his petition, 

petitioner alleged that the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine 

Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which he received on 

September 9, 2014, caused him to suffer transverse myelitis. Petitioner further 

alleges that he suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. 

Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil 

action for damages on his behalf as a result of his condition.

Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer 

transverse myelitis or any other injury. 

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto. The 

undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the 

 

1 The E-Government Act, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and 

Promotion of Electronic Government Services), requires that the Court post this decision on its 

website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing 

redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). 

Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.
2

Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $90,000.00 in the form of a check payable to 

petitioner, Russell Green. This amount represents compensation for all 

damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, 

the clerk is directed to enter judgment in case 16-612V according to this decision 

and the attached stipulation.2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Dan Hoffman, at (202) 357-

6360.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master

 

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each 

party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal 

Claims judge.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 23, 2016

a1116

Order 

Clerk

November 23, 2016

150787

LASHAWN D. REDMOND,

Plaintiff,

and

DESTINEE’S TRANSPORTATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 150787

COA: 313413

Wayne CC: 10-011348-AV

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE

INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________________________/

By order of March 31, 2015, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 

2014 judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in

Hodge v State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co (Docket No. 149043). On order of the 

Court, the case having been decided on June 6, 2016, 499 Mich 211 (2016), the 

application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Covenant 

Medical Center v State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins Co (Docket No. 152758) is pending 

on appeal before this Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised 

in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in 

ABEYANCE pending the decision in that case.
The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals

 

NATHAN P. WILSON 300 DEXTER AVENUE LYNN DEVAUGHN

 CLERK MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36104-3741 ASSISTANT CLERK

TELEPHONE 334-229-0733

July 12, 2024

CL-2023-0846

J.N. v. Houston County Department of Human Resources (Appeal from 

Houston Juvenile Court: JU-22-539.02).

ORDER

You are hereby notified that the following action was taken in the 

above cause by the Court of Civil Appeals: 

Application for Rehearing Overruled. No opinion written on 

rehearing.

Moore, P.J., and Edwards, Hanson, Fridy, and Lewis, JJ., concur.

Nathan P. Wilson, Clerk