alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Matteson vs. Smith and others.

Service op Summons. (1,8) *Proof of, under rule of court, when by other than sheriff. Requisites of affidavit of.*

*1.*Under rule 41, 0. 0. Rules, where the summons is served by any other person than the sheriff, the affidavit of service is insufficient if itdoes not state that a copy was *left with*(as well as delivered to) the defendant.

8. In case of service by leaving a copy of the summons with one of defendant’s family, the return must show that the person making the service could not find the defendant himself.

APPEAR from the Circuit Court for *Clark*County.

*R J. McBride,*for appellant.

*Boland & Matteson,*for respondent.

Lyon, J.

This appeal is from a judgment for' the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by the defendant *Smith.*The defendants *Rice and wife*are subsequent incumbrancers of the mortgaged premises. Neither defendant made appearance in the action. The summons was served by a person not an officer, and the affidavit of service is, that on a day and at a place therein named, the affiant served the summons and complaint, “personally on *B. J. Rice*and *Naomi Rice,*to him personally known, by handing each of said defendants, at their residence, a true copy thereof;” and on the defendant *Smith,, “*by leaving a true copy thereof with his wife, at his residence, at his last and usual place of abode, * * * who was informed of the contents thereof, she being a member of his family and a person of suitable age.”

Disregarding other alleged defects in the service, the return fails to show that a,copy of the summons was left with either of the defendants *Rice,*or that the defendant *Smith*was not found.

Rule 41 of the circuit court provides that where the service of the summons shall be made by any other person' than the sheriff, it shall be necessary for such person to state in his affi*334davit of service, *inter*alia, whether he left with the defendant a copy of the summons, as well as delivered it to him. This rule, which directs the manner in which proof of service by a person other than the sheriff shall be made, has the force of a statute; and in *Sayles v.*Davis, 20 Wis., 302, a judgment by default was reversed for failure to comply with it. The record fails to show, therefore, that the'court obtained jurisdiction to render judgment against the defendants *'Bice.*

Neither did the court acquire jurisdiction of the defendant *Smith.*Before a service made upon him by leaving a copy of the summons with one of his family can be held valid, it must affirmatively appear from the return that the person making the service could not find him. *Knox v.*Miller, 18 Wis., 397. See also *Pollard v.*Wegener, 13 Wis., 569; *Northrup v.*Shephard, 23 id., 513.

*By the Court.*—Judgment reversed.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2524 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 271
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2524

                          [Report No. 117-72]

  To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain 
 payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska Natives or descendants of 
  Alaska Natives from being used to determine eligibility for certain 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2021

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           February 10, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain 
 payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska Natives or descendants of 
  Alaska Natives from being used to determine eligibility for certain 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR CERTAIN PROGRAMS.

    Section 29(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 
1626(c)) is amended, in the undesignated matter following paragraph 
(3), by striking subparagraph (E) and inserting the following:
            ``(E) an interest in a Settlement Trust or an amount 
        distributed from or benefit provided by a Settlement Trust to a 
        Native or descendant of a Native who is an aged, blind, or 
        disabled individual (as defined in section 1614(a) of the 
        Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382c(a)).''.
                                                       Calendar No. 271

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2524

                          [Report No. 117-72]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to exclude certain 
 payments to aged, blind, or disabled Alaska Natives or descendants of 
  Alaska Natives from being used to determine eligibility for certain 
                   programs, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 10, 2022

                       Reported without amendment
```
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of

Videotron Ltd.

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Videotron Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ending
December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marie-Josée Marsan, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 20, 2013



/s/ Marie-Josée MarsanName:

Marie-Josée MarsanTitle:

Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1012 CAF 12-01062**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF STARR L. ROSHIA, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CHRISTOPHER J. THIEL, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

JENNIFER M. LORENZ, LANCASTER, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
MICHAEL A. SIRAGUSA, COUNTY ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (KRISTEN M. MARICLE OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered May 16, 2012 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4. The order confirmed the finding of the Support Magistrate that respondent willfully failed to obey an order of the Court. It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same Memorandum as in Matter of Roshia v Thiel ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Oct. 4, 2013).

Entered: October 4, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00287-CV 

OAKLAWN APARTMENTS, LTD. APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS APPELLEE 

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2016-000101-3

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

On October 20, 2016, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk 

responsible for preparing the record in this appeal had informed the court that 

payment arrangements had not been made to pay for the clerk’s record as 

required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 

35.3(a)(2). We stated that we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

unless appellant, within ten days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s 

record and provided this court with proof of payment. See Tex. R. App. P. 

37.3(b).

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk’s 

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want 

of prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

37.3(b), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: SUDDERTH, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and WALKER, J.

DELIVERED: November 23, 2016
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06669]



[[Page 15630]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLNML00000 L12200000.DF0000 15XL1109AF]


Notice of Public Meeting, Las Cruces District Resource Advisory 
Council Meeting, New Mexico

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act 
and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the Bureau of Land Management's 
(BLM), Las Cruces District Resource Advisory Council (RAC) will meet as 
indicated below.

DATES: The RAC will meet on April 22, 2015, at the BLM Las Cruces 
District Office, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, New Mexico from 9 
a.m.-4 p.m. The public may send written comments to the RAC at the BLM 
Las Cruces District Office, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, NM 88005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rena Gutierrez, BLM Las Cruces 
District, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, NM 88005, 575-525-4338. 
Persons who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) may call 
the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8229 to 
contact the above individual during normal business hours. The FIRS is 
available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a message or question 
with the above individual. You will receive a reply during normal 
business hours.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 10-member Las Cruces District RAC 
advises the Secretary of the Interior, through the BLM, on a variety of 
planning and management issues associated with public land management 
in New Mexico. Planned agenda items include a welcome and introduction 
of new Council members, and presentations and discussions related to 
the new Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument; the Dripping 
Springs/Baylor Road improvement project, the Prehistoric Trackways 
National Monument Proposed Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement; 
areas of critical environmental concern relevance and importance 
criteria; and issues related to the Gila River area.
    A half-hour public comment period during which the public may 
address the RAC is scheduled to begin at 2:30 p.m. All RAC meetings are 
open to the public. Depending on the number of individuals wishing to 
comment and time available, the time for individual oral comments may 
be limited.

Melanie Barnes,
Acting Deputy State Director, Lands and Resources.
[FR Doc. 2015-06669 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-FB-P
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K/A of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. McGuire,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas E. McGuire

Thomas E. McGuireChief Financial OfficerApril 12,
2005

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from CONSOLIDATED
CAPITAL INSTITUTION PROPERTIES 2000 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000352983
<NAME>                             CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL INSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                 7,092
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            791
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                42,147
<DEPRECIATION>                                        12,222
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        99,931
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                               26,859
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                            71,562
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          99,931
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      25,326
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       8,173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     1,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                          17,153
<EPS-BASIC>                                            85.31 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2015344EN.01000101.xml

| 17.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7754 — Blackstone/Corsair Capital/First Eagle)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 344/01)

On 12 October 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7754. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7754. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014354EN.01000101.xml

| 8.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7371 — Nordic Capital / Lindorff)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 354/01)

On 18 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7371. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7371. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 21, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA)

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on March 10, 2011 between EMA and EPA and 

included the following individuals:

EMA: Tim Blubaugh

EPA: Cle Jackson and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on reference test method for aerodynamic determination and 

standardized trailers.
### U.S. EPA- .q~°' ;0?d 2 D1V . OF EP3VihtiNt°1"P1TAL PLAWd(NG & f~iri0; EOTl0N 

## ,*tatQ of Nef>rr Jiers.eg 2010 MAY 12- P~ %1 : 22 DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CHRIS CHRISTIE ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION BOB MARTIN Governor DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Commissioner P.O . BOX 027 KIM GUADAGNO TRENTON, NJ 08625-0027 Lt . Governor May 7, 2010 Barbara Finazzo, Director United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region 2 Divisioli of Enviromnental Planning and Protection 290 Broadway New York, New

York 10007-1866 Dear Director Finazzo: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a supplement to New Jersey's State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision dated April 21, 2009. This supplement consists of administrative changes made to N .J .A.C. 7:27 -19 et .seq., Control and Prohibition of Air Pollution fromOxides of Nitrogen. Acopy of the corrections published in the New Jersey Register (NJR) and the updated Subchapter 19 rule are attached. The specific administrative changes consist of the following: 1 . N .J .A.C 7 :27 - 19.1 - Definitions : The definition of "interimperiod" erroneously listed the end date of "but no later than 12 months after May 19, 2010 ." The text "12 months after" should have been removed fromthe final rule to correctly state "but no later than May 19, 2010 . (NJR dated July 6, 2009) 2 . N .J .A.C. 7 :27-19.29(b)2 - 2009 HEDDEmission Reduction Compliance Demonstration Protocol : The deadline for submission of the 2009 HEDD Emission Reduction Compliance Demonstration Protocol was incorrectly inserted in the final rule as the date 30 days after the operative date instead of the operative date of the rule. The erroneous date was corrected to the rule operative date of May 19, 2009. (NJR dated June 15, 2009) If you have any questions regarding this SIP supplement, please contact Chris Salmi, Assistant Director of Air Quality Management in the NJDEP's Division of Air Quality, at (609) 984-1484.

New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer, Printed on Recycled Paper and RecyclableEnclosure: New Jersey Register, Monday, July 6, 2009 New Jersey Register, Monday, June 15, 2009 N .J .A.C. 7:27-19, Control and Prohibition ofAir Pollution fromOxides of Nitrogen c: Ray Werner, USEPA Chris Salmi, NJDEP Sharon Davis, NJDEP