alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2571 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2571

 To provide for the inclusion on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall of 
the names of the soldiers who died on Flying Tiger Flight 739 on March 
                               16, 1962.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 30, 2021

 Mr. Peters (for himself, Mrs. Blackburn, and Ms. Stabenow) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for the inclusion on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall of 
the names of the soldiers who died on Flying Tiger Flight 739 on March 
                               16, 1962.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Flying Tiger Flight 739 Act''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION ON THE VIETNAM VETERANS MEMORIAL WALL OF THE NAMES OF 
              THE SOLDIERS WHO DIED ON FLYING TIGER FLIGHT 739 ON MARCH 
              16, 1962.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Secretary of Defense (referred to in this Act as the 
``Secretary'') shall authorize the inclusion on the Vietnam Veterans 
Memorial Wall in the District of Columbia of the names of the 93 
soldiers who died on Flying Tiger Flight 739 when the flight crashed in 
the Pacific Ocean en route to Vietnam on March 16, 1962.
    (b) Required Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult with the 
Secretary of the Interior, the American Battle Monuments Commission, 
and other applicable authorities with respect to any adjustments to the 
nomenclature and placement of names pursuant to subsection (a) to 
address any space limitations on the placement of additional names on 
the Vietnam Veterans Memorial Wall.
    (c) Nonapplicability of Commemorative Works Act.--Chapter 89 of 
title 40, United States Code (commonly known as the ``Commemorative 
Works Act''), shall not apply to any activities carried out under 
subsection (a) or (b).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

NIKIA WAY KHAN, A/K/A NIKIA L. WAY, A/K/A NIKIA LYNNE WAY : : : : : : : : : No. 2060 Disciplinary Docket No. 3

Board File No. C1-14-290 (Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, No. M-2120) Attorney Registration No. 90321

O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 6 th day of August, 2014, Nikia Way Khan, a/k/a Nikia L

. Way, a/k/a Nikia Lynne Way, having been disbarred f rom the practice of law in the State of New York by Order of the Supreme Court of New Yo rk, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, filed June 27, 2013; the said Nikia Way Khan, a/k/a Nikia L. Way, a/k/a Nikia Lynne Way, having been directed on June 2, 2014, to inform this Court of any claim she has that the imposition of the identi cal or comparable discipline in this

Commonwealth would be unwarranted and the reasons t herefor; and no response having been filed, it is ORDERED that Nikia Way Khan, a/k/a Nikia L. Way, a/k/a Nikia Lynne Way, is disbarred from the practice of law in this Commonwealth and she shall comply with all the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E.
Message



---



##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---



##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

##### 

Message



---

#####
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2084 

To terminate the order requiring persons to wear masks while on conveyances 

and at transportation hubs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 16, 2021 

Mr. SCOTT of Florida introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To terminate the order requiring persons to wear masks 

while on conveyances and at transportation hubs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Mandating Addi5 tional Requirements for Travel Act’’ or the ‘‘SMART 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. REVOCATION OF CDC ORDER. 

8 Effective on July 4, 2021, the order issued on Janu9 ary 29, 2021, by the Centers for Disease Control and Pre10 vention under section 361 of the Public Health Service 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2084 IS

1 Act (42 U.S.C. 264) establishing a requirement for per2 sons to wear masks while on conveyances and at transpor3 tation hubs shall have no force or effect. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2015174EN.01000101.xml

| 28.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 174/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 174/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

27 May 2015

(2015/C 174/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0863 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,37 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4565 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70700 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2708 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0331 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4255 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,404 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,80 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1335 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4480 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8848 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4089 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3531 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4222 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5031 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4691 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 205,12 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1620 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7338 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5755 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 361,48 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9615 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 48,586 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 56,4100 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,777 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4335 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,6550 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,5788 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0863

JPY

Japanese yen

134,37

DKK

Danish krone

7,4565

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70700

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2708

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0331

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4255

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,404

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,80

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1335

RON

Romanian leu

4,4480

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8848

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4089

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3531

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4222

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5031

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4691

KRW

South Korean won

1 205,12

ZAR

South African rand

13,1620

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7338

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5755

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 361,48

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9615

PHP

Philippine peso

48,586

RUB

Russian rouble

56,4100

THB

Thai baht

36,777

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4335

MXN

Mexican peso

16,6550

INR

Indian rupee

69,5788

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
COLO:RADO 

Depar:tment of PubUc 

Health & Environment 

Dedicated to protecting'and improving the health and.environment of the people of Colorado. 

Octeber 7, 2015 

Linda Kiefer 

Remediation Project Manager 

U.S. EPA, Region 8 

1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR-SR) 

Denver, CO 80202 

RE: CDPHE Concurrence on Partial Deletion of Operable Unit 1 of the Calif~rnia 

Gulch Superfund Site 

Dear Ms. Kiefer: 

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) has reviewed 

both the Notice oflntent for Partial Deletion and the directfmal Notice of Partial 

Deletion for Operable Unit 1 (Yak Tunnel/Water Treatment Plant) of the California 

Gulch Superfund Site. ·· 

EPA and the State have determined that all appropriate response actiens under the 

Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Lia:bility Act (CERCLA), 

have been completed~ other than operations and maintenance, monitoring, and five-year 

reviews. Operations and maintenance, including moni~oring activities, are the 

responsibility ofResurrection/Newmont (the PRP), with oversight from EPA and the 

State. Furthermore, institutional controls (ICs) are in place in the form of environmental 

covenants in order to ensure long• term protectiveness ofthe remedy. EPA will continue 

to conduct five-year reviews. 

Therefore, CDPHE agrees that all necessary actions have been taken to delete Operable 

Unit 1 of the California Gulch Superfund Site from the National Priorities List. 

Sincerely, , . 

/) ":''-/ //~ 

C. !arit/z U~-r.~;r4(?,_ 

Gary B~hman ;.) 

Director 

Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division 

cc: Jennifer Robbins, AGO 

Doug Jamison, CDPHE 

Monica Sheets, CDPHE 

4300 Cherry Creek DriveS., Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692·2000 .www.colorado.gov/cdphe 

John w. Hicken looper, Governor 1 Larry Wolk, MD, MSPH, Executive Director and Chief Medical Officer
# C_2014453EN.01000101.xml

| 17.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 453/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 453/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7445 — 3i Group/Christ Juweliere und Uhrmacher seit 1863)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 453/01)

On 11 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7445. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7445. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                Kevco Delaware, Inc.,
                a Delaware corporation.

                Sunbelt Wood Components, Inc.,
                a Delaware corporation.

                Bowen Supply, Inc.,
                a Georgia corporation.

                Shelter Components Corporation,
                an Indiana corporation.

                BPR Holdings, Inc.,
                an Indiana corporation.

                Shelter Components of Indiana, Inc.,
                an Indiana corporation.

                Design Components, Inc.,
                an Indiana corporation.

                Duo-Form of Michigan, Inc.
                a Michigan corporation.

                DCM, Inc.,
                an Indiana corporation.

                Shelter Distribution, L.P.,
                an Indiana listed partnership(1).

(1) Sole general partner is BPR Holdings, Inc.; sole limited partner is Shelter 
Components of Indiana, Inc.
# CA2014410EN.01000201.xml

| 18.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 410/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 410/2

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 410 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 293 | (NL) |
| 295 | (MT) |
| 297 | |
| 299 | |
| 304 | |
| 321 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 325 | (SL) |
| 332 | |
| 334 | |
| 340 | |
| 342 | (EN) |
| 352 | |
| 354 | |
| 358 | |
| 366 | |
| 376 | |
| 378 | (SV) |
| 381 | |
| 384 | |
| 385 | (PT) |
| 390 | (HR) |
| 391 | |
| 410 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

293

(NL)

295

(MT)

297

299

304

321

(DE/EN/FR)

325

(SL)

332

334

340

342

(EN)

352

354

358

366

376

378

(SV)

381

384

385

(PT)

390

(HR)

391

410

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6995

TERESA MILLER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, 

District Judge. (2:16-cv-00007-JPB-RWT)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Teresa Miller, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Young, OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Teresa Miller seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant 

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge 

recommended that relief be denied and advised Miller that 

failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could 

waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have 

been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. 

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Miller has waived appellate 

review by failing to file objections after receiving proper 

notice. Accordingly, we deny Miller’s motions to admit 

additional evidence and for disclosure of the presentence 

report, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the 

appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
NO.  07-12-0292-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	JULY 23, 2012	____________________________

	DANA L. HENDERSON,

				Appellant

V.

JAMES WAYNE JONES,

                           				Appellee

	___________________________

FROM THE 261st DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY;

	NO. D-1-GN-11-003882; HON. LORA J. LIVINGSTON, PRESIDING

__________________________

Order of Dismissal

__________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and BOYD, S.J.[footnoteRef:1] [1: John T. Boyd, Senior Justice, sitting by assignment.] 

Appellant Dana L. Henderson filed a notice of appeal on May 31, 2012, but failed to pay the $175 filing fee required under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 5.  We informed appellant, by letter dated July 10, 2012, that the filing fee was outstanding and that the appeal would be dismissed unless it was paid by July 20, 2012.  TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c); see Holt v. F.F. Enterprises, 990 S.W.2d 756 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 1998, pet. ref’d).  The fee has not been paid to date.  Nor does the record show appellant to be indigent or having requested leave to proceed as an indigent.

Because appellant has failed to pay the requisite filing fee as directed by the court, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c). 

                                                               Per Curiam

2

2
Exhibit 31.2I, Diana Garvis Purcel, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Famous Dave’s of America, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this annual report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15e and15d-14) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) for the registrant and we have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designated under our system to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annualreport is being prepared; and  b. designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; and  c. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annualreport based on such evaluation; and  d. disclosed in this annual report changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: March 17, 2006 By: /s/ Diana Garvis Purcel         Diana Garvis Purcel