alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD SHUPE; MARIA L. SHUPE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 v.

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-16241

D.C. No. 4:11-cv-00501-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Richard and Maria L. Shupe appeal pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in their action alleging a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection

Act of 1991 (“TCPA”) and state law claims. We review de novo. Johnson v. Bay

Area Rapid Transit Dist., 724 F.3d 1159, 1168 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm.

FILED

NOV 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Contrary to the Shupes’ contention, Chase’s calls to collect on a debt were

exempt under the TCPA. See 47 U.S.C. § 227(b)(1)(B) (prohibiting the use of an

artificial or prerecorded voice in a call to a residential telephone line unless

exempted by a rule or order of the Federal Communications Commission); see also

In the Matter of Rules & Regulations Implementing the Tel. Consumer Prot. Act of

1991, Report and Order, 7 F.C.C. Rcd. 8752, 8773 ¶ 39 (Oct. 16, 1992) (debt

collection calls are “covered by exemptions . . . for commercial calls which do not

transmit an unsolicited advertisement”). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the Shupes’ motion

for leave to amend their complaint because they failed to demonstrate good cause. 

See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607-09 (9th Cir. 1992)

(setting forth standard of review and holding that a party seeking amendment after

the deadline set forth in the scheduling order must demonstrate good cause, the

focus of which is the diligence of the moving party). 

We reject as without merit the Shupes’ contention that the district court

failed to give them an opportunity to authenticate evidence they submitted in

support of their motion for summary judgment. 

We do not consider documents not presented to the district court. See

United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990). 

2 14-16241
We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett

v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

AFFIRMED.

3 14-16241
1



## – HPLC analysis

A ugust 21, 20132

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Column: 150 mm x 4.6 mm 5μm xdb- c18 column

Mobile phase: THF/water gradient

Flow Rate: 1 ml/min

Detection : UV @ 230nm

Temperature: 25°C

Injection volume: 0.2 μL

QUANTITATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF IMPURITIES

A Single -point calibration was used for the 4 main components of . and were supplied from the Sponsor and used without further purification. Response factors were generated for these substances and these factors were used to quantify the wt% component in .

1.

Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of (19.3mg/10ml THF; 0.2μL injection)3

2.

Figure 2. HPLC chromatogram of (5.9 mg/10ml THF; 0.2μL injection)

3.

Figure 3. HPLC chromatogram (4.6mg/10ml THF; 0.2μL injection)4

Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of

Figure 5. HPLC chromatogram of (29.9 mg/10ml, 0.2μL injection)5
# C_2014119EN.01000301.xml

| 23.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

22 April 2014

2014/C 119/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3817 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4663 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0925 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2214 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2615 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,481 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1906 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4667 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9568 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4753 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5218 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7119 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6057 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7357 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 436,07 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5917 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6175 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6248 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 933,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5128 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,526 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,3868 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,658 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0979 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0222 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,9659 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3817

JPY

Japanese yen

141,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4663

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82050

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0925

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2214

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2615

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,481

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1906

RON

Romanian leu

4,4667

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9568

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4753

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5218

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7119

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6057

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7357

KRW

South Korean won

1 436,07

ZAR

South African rand

14,5917

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6175

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6248

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 933,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5128

PHP

Philippine peso

61,526

RUB

Russian rouble

49,3868

THB

Thai baht

44,658

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0979

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0222

INR

Indian rupee

83,9659

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2016030EN.01000201.xml

| 27.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7889 — Engie/REC/TEN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2016/C 30/03)

On 21 January 2016, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7889. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32016M7889. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015119EN.01000101.xml

| 14.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.7419 — TeliaSonera/Telenor/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 119/01)

On 8 April 2015, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301) or by post, under reference number M.7419 — TeliaSonera/Telenor/JV, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

January 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA)

FROM: Angela Cullen

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on Tuesday, January 18, 2011 between EMA, 

NHTSA and EPA and included the following individuals:

EMA: Tim Blubaugh - EMA, Andrea Brown - Navistar, Dave Kayes – Daimler, Don 

Keski-Hynnila-Detroit Diesel, Dan Kieffer – PACCAR, Rich Mihelic-Daimler, Josef 

Tarp – PACCAR, Mike Sorrells - Volvo

NHTSA/DOT: Kevin Greene, Coralie Cooper

EPA: Byron Bunker, Cheryl Bynum, Sam Waltzer, Arvon Mitcham, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on reference test method for aerodynamic determination and 

standardized trailers.
ISSUED: November 16, 2016 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT OF 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, DC 

Zll. NOV t 1 A 3: l 0 

In The Matter Of: ) DOCKET OPERATiONS 

) Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

Pacific International Skydiving Center . ., ) 

) 

Respondent ) 

TO: Bryan Stanley 

67-314 Kaliuna Street 

Waialua, HI 96791 

SUBPOENA 

Case No. 2014WP130012 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(3), YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and 

testify at a hearing scheduled to begin at the following place, date, and time: 

1. Location: 

2. Date: 

3. Time: 

United States District Court, District of Hawaii 

300 Ala Moana Blvd. 

Honolulu, HI 96850 

December 13, 2016 

9:00 a.m. local time 

This subpoena is issued because the Respondent, Pacific International Skydiving Center, 

filed an application on November 12, 2016 requesting your presence to testify at this hearing. If 

you have any questions about the subpoena, you should contact the Respondent's counsel at the 

address and telephone number listed below. 

The provisions of 14 C.F .R. § 13 .228(b) allow you to file a motion to quash or modify this 

subpoena with the undersigned judge. The applicant shall describe, in detail, the basis for the 

application to quash or modify the subpoena including, but not limited to, a statement that the 

testimony is not relevant to the proceeding or that the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. 

A motion to quash or modify the subpoena will stay the effect of the subpoena pending a 

decision by the undersigned judge on the motion. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.229, you are entitled to the same fees and mileage expenses as are 
paid to witnesses appearing in the courts of the United States. These fees shall be paid by the 

Respondent, the party at whose request you have been subpoenaed. 

If you fail or refuse to comply with this subpoena, a party may, in accordance with 14 C.F.R 

§ 13 .228( c), apply to the local federal district court to seek judicial enforcement of the subpoena. 

Subpoena issued at the request of: 

Robert L. Feldman, Respondent's Counsel 

8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 

Miami, FL 33176 

TEL: 305-598-4841 

FAX: 305-598-4842 

Docket No. FAA-2014-1116 

DOUGLAS M. RA WALD 

Administrative Law Judge 

Subpoena, page 2
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

KRYSTAL MARIN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-1179

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 23, 2016. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; J. Thomas McGrady, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

BLACK, Judge.

In this Anders1 appeal, we affirm Krystal Marin's judgment and sentences 

but remand for the trial court to correct scrivener's errors on the amended probation 

 

1Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 
- 2 -

revocation orders. On February 9 and 15, 2016, the trial court entered probation 

revocation orders but failed to specify the conditions of probation violated. During the 

pendency of this appeal, Marin filed a motion to correct sentencing error under Florida 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), requesting that the trial court amend the 

revocation orders to reflect the conditions violated. The trial court granted Marin's 

motion and directed the clerk to enter amended revocation orders reflecting that Marin 

admitted to violating conditions one, three, five, seven, and eleven. While the amended 

orders entered on June 15, 2016, state that Marin violated conditions three, five, seven, 

and eleven, they fail to list condition one. We therefore remand for entry of corrected 

revocation orders which accurately reflect the conditions of probation Marin admitted to 

violating. See Margolis v. State, 148 So. 3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014). 

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

CRENSHAW and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
# C_2015322EN.01000301.xml

| 30.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 322/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 322/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 September 2015

(2015/C 322/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1204 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4607 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4462 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0901 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5220 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,208 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,75 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2356 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4223 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,4030 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,6009 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5000 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6831 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7616 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6004 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 338,63 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,5812 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1316 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6535 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 442,26 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,9835 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,480 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,4567 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,832 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,5834 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,0160 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,9411 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1204

JPY

Japanese yen

134,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4607

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73910

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4462

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0901

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5220

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,208

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,75

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2356

RON

Romanian leu

4,4223

TRY

Turkish lira

3,4030

AUD

Australian dollar

1,6009

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5000

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6831

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7616

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6004

KRW

South Korean won

1 338,63

ZAR

South African rand

15,5812

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1316

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6535

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 442,26

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,9835

PHP

Philippine peso

52,480

RUB

Russian rouble

73,4567

THB

Thai baht

40,832

BRL

Brazilian real

4,5834

MXN

Mexican peso

19,0160

INR

Indian rupee

73,9411

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 23.1


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-82016 of Computerized Thermal Imaging and subsidiaries on Form S-3 and
Registration Statement No. 333-92378 on Form S-8 of our report dated September
25, 2002, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the
year ended June 30, 2002 and 2001, and for the period June 10, 1987 (date of
inception) to June 30, 2002.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Salt Lake City, Utah
September 25, 2002
# C_2015316EN.01000301.xml

| 24.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 316/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 316/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 September 2015

(2015/C 316/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1150 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,03 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4599 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72970 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3798 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0882 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,2370 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,090 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,91 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2036 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4183 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,3730 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5813 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4790 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6414 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,7712 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5850 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 328,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 15,2287 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1165 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5833 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 297,40 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,8471 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 52,174 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 73,6019 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,286 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,4794 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,7989 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 73,5690 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1150

JPY

Japanese yen

134,03

DKK

Danish krone

7,4599

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72970

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3798

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0882

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,2370

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,090

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,91

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2036

RON

Romanian leu

4,4183

TRY

Turkish lira

3,3730

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5813

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4790

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6414

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,7712

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5850

KRW

South Korean won

1 328,24

ZAR

South African rand

15,2287

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1165

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5833

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 297,40

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,8471

PHP

Philippine peso

52,174

RUB

Russian rouble

73,6019

THB

Thai baht

40,286

BRL

Brazilian real

4,4794

MXN

Mexican peso

18,7989

INR

Indian rupee

73,5690

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014147EN.01000101.xml

| 16.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 147/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 147/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.7000 — Liberty Global/Ziggo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 147/01

On 8 May 2014, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the above-mentioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+ 32 22964301) or by post, under reference No M.7000 — Liberty Global/Ziggo, to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Opinion issued November 17, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00272-CV

———————————

RUDY CHEVALIER, Appellant

V.

BERNADETTE PRESLEY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2012-59031

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

10.3(a), 42.1(a)(1). No other party has filed a notice of appeal and no opinion has 

issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Further, although appellant failed to include a 

certificate of conference in his motion, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of 
2

service, more than ten days have passed since the motion was filed, and no party 

has responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Higley and Huddle.
# C_2015348EN.01000302.xml

| 21.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 348/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 348/3

---

Special Report No 12/2015

‘The EU priority of promoting a knowledge-based rural economy has been affected by poor management of knowledge-transfer and advisory measures’

(2015/C 348/05)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 12/2015 ‘The EU priority of promoting a knowledge-based rural economy has been affected by poor management of knowledge-transfer and advisory measures’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---