alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
04/28/201 1 15:4 2 B16329410 6 Sft D P-^G E02/0 2 

# Q U.S , Deportmenl o f Trorispoi1t3+!c> n- • ; '• • ">['> . C ' \\ : 'v

^ / > r" Q ^' [ i r' I • ' Smal l Airplan e Oirectorot e Kanaaf i City . M O 6^10 6 Federa l Aviation Administratio n 

### AP R 

### 2 8 201 1 1 . ^

Mr . Stephe n Sain t Presiden t Indigenou s People s Technolog y an dEducatio n Cente r (ITEC ) 1057 5 S W147^^

* Circl e Dunnellon , F L3443 2 Dear Mr . Saint ; Thi s lette r

i s i n respons e t o you r

inquir y o n th e statu s o f

th e ITE C jpetitio n for

exemptio n for Docke t No . FAA-2010-1221 . Th e relie f sough t woul denabl e tTE C t o exten dth e weigh t allowanc e for

th e "Mavericlc " powere dparachute , light-sport aircraf t intende dfo r

bot hflight operation s an doperatio n o n publi c roadways . Wc are developin g arespons e t o you r re<]ue& t an dexpec t

t o mak e afinal decisio n withi n th e nex t few weeks . A final decisio n o n you r petitio n fo

r exemptio n ha s th e potentia l t o establis h precedenc e fo r

future polic y an dmlemalcin g regardin g powere dparachut e an dothe r light

spcr t aircraft . Therefore , w e ar e takin g additiona l tim e wit hthi s decisio n t o anemp t t o cove r a s man y area s a s possibl e befor e makin g th e fina l decision . W c wil l advis e yo u o f

th e agency' s fina

l decisio n o n you r

petitio n a s soo n a s possible . I f yo u hav e further

questions , pleas e feel fre e t o contac t Mr . Terry Chastee n at

816-329-4147 . Sincerely , Ear l Lawrenc e Manager , Smal l Airplan e Directorat e Aircraf t Certificatio n Servic e
# C_2015231EN.01000102.xml

| 15.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7656 — CD&R Group/Scimitar Topco Limited)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 231/02)

On 6 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7656. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7656. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING 

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED 

 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

 OF FLORIDA 

 SECOND DISTRICT 

SHERRY GREENWOOD, ) 

 ) 

 Petitioner, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Case No. 2D15-3553 

 ) 

STATE OF FLORIDA, ) 

 ) 

 Respondent. ) 

 ) 

Opinion filed October 14, 2015. 

Petition for Writ of Prohibition to the Circuit 

Court for Pinellas County; Chris Helinger, 

Judge. 

Wade M. Whidden of Whidden Law P.L., 

Tampa, for Petitioner. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Susan M. Shanahan, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for 

Respondent. 

PER CURIAM. 

Sherry Greenwood petitions this court for a writ prohibiting Circuit Court 

Judge Chris Helinger from presiding over her criminal prosecution in Pinellas County 

Circuit Court case number 14-11063-CF. We grant the petition. 

Ms. Greenwood, through counsel, filed a motion to disqualify Judge 

Helinger from presiding over her case. At the beginning of a pretrial hearing, Judge 
 -2-

Helinger provided counsel with an order denying the motion to disqualify as legally 

insufficient. The order does not comment on the truth of the facts presented in the 

motion. However, during the hearing, Judge Helinger improperly attempted to refute 

facts that Ms. Greenwood alleged as a basis for believing that she would not receive a 

fair trial or sentencing before Judge Helinger. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330(f); Bundy 

v. Rudd, 366 So. 2d 440, 442 (Fla. 1978) ("When a judge has looked beyond the mere 

legal sufficiency of a suggestion of prejudice and attempted to refute the charges of 

partiality, he has then exceeded the proper scope of his inquiry and on that basis alone 

established grounds for his disqualification."). Accordingly, we grant Ms. Greenwood's 

petition, we vacate the stay of the proceedings in case number 14-11063-CF previously 

imposed by this court, and we order the Chief Judge of the Sixth Judicial Circuit to 

assign a successor judge pursuant to rule 2.215(b)(4) to preside over the case. 

Petition granted. 

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
# C_2015201EN.01000201.xml

| 18.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 201/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 201/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 June 2015

(2015/C 201/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1279 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,78 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4575 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71700 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2185 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0451 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,7245 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,240 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1576 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4860 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0860 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4694 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3887 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7445 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6284 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5189 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 263,34 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0226 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0010 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5820 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 051,87 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2356 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,962 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,0345 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,015 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4952 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3843 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,3435 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1279

JPY

Japanese yen

139,78

DKK

Danish krone

7,4575

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71700

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2185

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0451

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,7245

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,240

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1576

RON

Romanian leu

4,4860

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0860

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4694

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3887

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7445

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6284

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5189

KRW

South Korean won

1 263,34

ZAR

South African rand

14,0226

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0010

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5820

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 051,87

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2356

PHP

Philippine peso

50,962

RUB

Russian rouble

61,0345

THB

Thai baht

38,015

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4952

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3843

INR

Indian rupee

72,3435

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HOMECOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE THREE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           9,435
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  900,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                    96,345
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               816,095
<PP&E>                                         493,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                 126,816
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,804,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,594,261
<BONDS>                                        100,224
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           192
<OTHER-SE>                                    (995,511)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,804,868
<SALES>                                         16,032
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               909,177
<CGS>                                            8,787
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  340,893
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               933,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (10,500)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,524
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (374,650)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (374,650)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (374,650)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.19)


</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 14

- 00219

- CR Freddy Earl PERRYMAN , Appellant

v. The State of The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR9 136 Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 14, 2014
DISMISSED Pursuant to a plea

- bargain agreement, Freddy Perryman pled nolo contendere to sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to twelve years in prison in accordance with the terms of his plea

- bargain agreement. On January 28, 2014 , the trial court signed a ce rtification of defendant’s right to appeal stating that this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Perryman filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent copies of the certification and the notice of appeal to this court. See id . 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id . 25.2(d).04

- 14

- 00219

- CR “In a plea bargain case .

. . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal.” Id . 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contai ns a written plea bargain, establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id . The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon befor e trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave Perryman permission to appeal. See id . The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea

- bargain case and that Perryman does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” Id . 25.2(d). We, therefore, warned Perryman that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedur e 25.2(d), unless an amended trial co urt certification showing that Perryman had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d), 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order). No such ame nded trial court certification has been filed. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).

PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2

-
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


GraphOn Corporation
Santa Cruz, California


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-145284, 333-119402, 333-107336, 333-40174 and
333-88255) of GraphOn Corporation of our report dated March 31, 2008, relating
to the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-KSB.


/s/ Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP
-------------------------------
Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP
Sacramento, California


March 31, 2008
Exhibit 32.2

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Yu, Co-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition of the Company as of March 31, 2007 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2007.



/s/ Carol YuCarol Yu, Co-President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 8, 2007




-57-
---

---

EXHIBIT 15

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

On Track Innovations Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the registration statements on Form F-3 (No. 333-111770, No. 333-115953, No.
333-121316, No. 333-127615, No. 333-130324 and No. 333-142320) and in the registration
statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-116429 and No. 333-140786) of On Track Innovations
Ltd. of our report dated March 29, 2007, with respect to the consolidated balance
sheets of On Track Innovations Ltd. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity and
comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
December 31, 2006, which report appears in the December 31, 2006 annual report on Form
20-F of On Track Innovations Ltd. Our report refers to a change in the method of
accounting for stock-based compensation.

/s/ Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel Aviv, Israel
June 22, 2007



---

---
# C_2015255EN.01000101.xml

| 4.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 255/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 255/1

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,05 % on 1 August 2015

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 August 2015

(2015/C 255/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0951 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4615 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70280 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4865 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0598 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0005 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,041 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,89 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1498 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4050 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0430 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5071 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4404 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4903 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6618 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5087 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 281,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,9277 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8002 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5905 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 790,19 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2181 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,078 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 68,5891 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,419 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,7824 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6897 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,1343 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0951

JPY

Japanese yen

136,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4615

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70280

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4865

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0598

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0005

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,041

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,89

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1498

RON

Romanian leu

4,4050

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0430

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5071

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4404

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4903

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6618

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5087

KRW

South Korean won

1 281,97

ZAR

South African rand

13,9277

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8002

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5905

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 790,19

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2181

PHP

Philippine peso

50,078

RUB

Russian rouble

68,5891

THB

Thai baht

38,419

BRL

Brazilian real

3,7824

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6897

INR

Indian rupee

70,1343

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
NSA OPEHATIOHS ORDEl1 

?fU.MBER 304 ( Chancre 3) 

NATIO;tf AL SECURITX' AGEDCY 

Washington 25 J D. C •, 2 May 1955 

CANCELLED WHE.'N CHANGE IJAS BEEU Eil'rERED IN BASIC OPERATIONS ORDER 

1. In Section II, parao;rapb l, insert new sub-parao;raph c., a~ 

followo and re-desio;nate the remainino; sub-paraGraphs accordingly: 

"c. Perform asstgned COMINT weather tasks in support of 

Alaskan Air Command." 

2. In Section IV, para.araph 5.b., insert new sub-paragraph (2) 

as follows and re-designate the rcmainine sub-paragraphs accordingly: 

"(2) Disseminate Special Weather IntelliBence to designated 

Air Force and Navy recipients in accordance with prescribed fonnats and 

procedures." 

3. In Section IV, paragraph 7, insert new sub-paragraph b., as 

follows and re-desi~nate the remaining sub-paragraphs accordingly: 

"b. Lialson with Special Weather Intelligence Security 

Officers in the Alaskan area as required for accomplishment of the 

Special Weather IntelliBEmce mission is authorized." 

BY COMMAND OF MAJOR G~ ACKERMAN: 

OFFICIAL: 

ALFRED R. MARCY 

Colonel US Army 

Deputy Directol" 

Production 

~/V . / J · I r_;l,t-(,a,U~- T. CARDIUAL 

Maj WAC 

Actg Asst Adj Gen 

DISTRIBUTION 

S:r;ecial 

TOr EJEeRJ!f.F CONTROL N1MBER 55-0899 

COP!! of 124 COPIES 

PAGE 1 of 1 PAGES 

l:tAMllbi VlA G9M1NT GHANNELS 0NLY 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-08-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3 

TOP SECJRET 

... . . . . . . 

..... .. • • 

. 

.. ... .. 

. . . ••• 

. . . •
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00610

- CV

Michael P. GEARY, Independ ent Executor of the Estate of Joseph William Geary, Jr., Deceased and Falcon Energy, Inc.

, Appellant s

v.

TOW BOW RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP , Two Bow Management, LC and Ronald L. Toms, Individually, Appellee s

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexa r County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015

- CI

- 03609 Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The A p pellees ’ Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is extended to June 5, 201 9. No further extensions of time to file appellees’ brief will be allowed.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Ju stice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 13th day of May, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, C lerk of Court
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 242 

To provide for an extension of temporary financing of short-time compensation 

programs. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. REED introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide for an extension of temporary financing of shorttime compensation programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Layoff Prevention Act 

5 of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY FINANCING OF SHORT7 TIME COMPENSATION PAYMENTS IN STATES 

8 WITH PROGRAMS IN LAW. 

9 Section 2108(b)(2) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 

10 9026(b)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘March 14, 2021’’ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 242 IS

1 and inserting ‘‘the date that is 5 years and 6 months after 

2 the date of enactment of the Layoff Prevention Act of 

3 2021’’. 

4 SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF TEMPORARY FINANCING OF SHORT5 TIME COMPENSATION AGREEMENTS. 

6 Section 2109(d)(2) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 

7 9027(d)(2)) is amended by striking ‘‘March 14, 2021’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘the date that is 2 years and 13 weeks after 

9 the date of enactment of the Layoff Prevention Act of 

10 2021’’. 

11 SEC. 4. EXTENSION OF GRANTS FOR SHORT-TIME COM12 PENSATION PROGRAMS. 

13 (a) EXTENSION; ADDITIONAL FUNDING.—Section 

14 2110 of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 9028) is amended— 

15 (1) in subsection (b)(1), by striking 

16 ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$200,000,000’’; 

17 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘December 

18 31, 2023’’ and inserting ‘‘December 31, 2026’’; and 

19 (3) in subsection (g), by striking 

20 ‘‘$100,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$200,000,000’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

22 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact23 ment of the CARES Act (Public Law 116–136). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00657-CV

EX PARTE KEVIN JOSEPH OLIVER,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-07718

Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On September 19, 2016, appellant filed its notice of appeal. On November 10, 2016, the 

court reporter responsible for preparing the reporter’s record in this appeal filed a notification of 

late record, stating that she has not received a request for the reporter’s record and that the 

appellant has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the reporter’s 

record.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been 

made to pay the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s 

fee. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within 

thirty days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points 

raised in appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court