alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014215EN.01000601.xml

| 9.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 215/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 215/6

---

Call for proposals and related activities under the 2014 work plan of the Fuel Cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking

2014/C 215/06

Notice is hereby given of the launch of the call for proposals and related activities under the 2014 work plan of the Fuel cells and Hydrogen 2 Joint Undertaking (FCH 2 JU).

This work plan, including deadlines and budgets for the activities, is available through the Participant Portal website (http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal) along with information on the modalities of the call and related activities, and guidance for applicants on how to submit proposals. All this information will be updated as necessary on the same Participant Portal.

---
# M ASURE

January 

### 28, 2016 :. 

## 0 1 Hand Delivery Mr. Rick May 

### UAS R&D lntegrati.on 

### Lead. 490 

### L'Enfant Plaza Room 3200 Washington, DC 20024 Copy

### to_: Docket Management System West 

### Building Ground Floor, 

### Room w12-140 1200 NewJ.e.rsey Avenue, 

### SE Washington D.C., 20590 Reference: 

### December 6, 2015 Amendmentto Measure's Exemption No. 12646 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-1602 R.e: Conditions and limitations #26 All Flight operations must be conducted at least 

### 500feet

### from all nonparticipating persons, vessels, vehicles

.. 

### and structures RE: 

### Measure UAS, Inc. 500' 

### Amendment Request Dear Rick, Please insure the requested Amendment remains confidentiaL The conditions proposed bythe applicant are drawn from Order 

### 8900.1 CHG 0, Volume 3. Petitioner submits as a Confidential documents under 14 CFR § 

### 11.35(b), as this information contains confidential commercial and

### proprie_~ary information that the Petitionecbas.not and 

### will 

### nofshare 

### with others. The information containsoperating conditions and procedures 

### that are 

### not availableto 

### the public

### and are protected from release under the Freedom ofinformation Act 

### 5U.S.C.§552et.seq. Please let me 

### know 

### ifyou have any questions. Your promptattention in this matter is greatly appreciated. Krnd regards,**.~~**

# ~ VP Infrastructure Measure
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof, I, Yi Tong, Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1.
The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.








February
11, 2010




By:
              /s/ Yi
      TongYi
      Tong, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Pacer Energy, Ltd., * From the 118th District Court

 of Martin County,

 Trial Court No. 7518.

Vs. No. 11-21-00169-CV * September 14, 2023

Endeavor Energy Resources, LP; * Opinion by Bailey, C.J.

Pony Oil, LLC; Viper Energy (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Partners, LLC; MKSea, LLC; Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

Royalty Asset Holdings, LP;

and Pony Oil Operating, LLC, 

 

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal are taxed against Pacer Energy, Ltd.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION – Chief Financial Officer**

I, Steve Filton,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Health Services, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cashflows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f)and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal controls over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: November 6, 2009
<PAGE>
                                                                   Exhibit 99
                        Annual Statement as to Compliance
                                        
                                NationsBank, N.A.
                                        
                       NationsBank Auto Owner Trust 1996-A

     The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of NationsBank, N.A. , as
Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1,1996
(the "Agreement"), between NationsBank Auto Owner Trust 1996-A, as Issuer,
NationsBank N.A., as Servicer, and NationsBank, N.A., NationsBank, N.A. (South)
and NationsBank of Texas, N.A., as sellers, does hereby certify that:


1.   Capitalized terms used in this Officer's Certificate have their respective
     meanings set forth in the Agreement.

2.   NationsBank, N.A. is as of the date hereof the Servicer under the
     Agreement.

3.   The undersigned is duly authorized pursuant to the Agreement to execute and
     deliver this Officer's Certificate to the Trustee.

4.   The certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Agreement.

5.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from July 1,
     1996 through December 31, 1996, and of its performance under the Agreement
     was made under my supervision.

6.   Based on such review, to the best of my knowledge, the Servicer has fully
     performed all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period,
     and no event which, with the giving of notice or passage of time or both,
     would constitute an Event of Default has occurred or is continuing.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer,
has duly executed this Officer's Certificate this 29th day of January, 1997.



                              By: /s/ Leslie J. Fitzpatrick
                                 ----------------------------
                                      Leslie J. Fitzpatrick
                                      Senior Vice President
REF ID:A67295 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
'j 

I • 

_;. 

--- .. _ __....-.......... - ........... ---------------- -·- -- ~~-.-.-

-... ' ' ;.. 

... - -

DRAFT 2 December 1943 

REPORT ON STUDY OF CR.YPl'OGRAPHIC SYSTE"11.,S USED BY STATE DEPARTV.ENT 

- ----'11- r ., ,_ 

. l. In accordance with me~orandwn from Colonel Corderman dated 29 

November 1943, subject "Resurvey of State Department Security'' a committee 

cons;sting of Major Brown, C~ptain Douglas, and Captain koak called upon 

r\:r; Salmon 1 December 1943. All systems currently used by the Departll'...ent 

were studied from a purely technicai point of view. This report does 

not consider actual use of the systems by operating agencies nor the 

questions of physical security. 

2. Six basic systems are in use by the Departrr.ent: Cipher device 

:~-134A, cipher device CSP 1127, strip syste~s, A, Band G enciphered code 

systems, BROWl'J code, and GRAY code. The findings of the con.mittee with 

regard to each system are as follows: 

a. Cipher device !~134.~ - T:1e comr .. ittee is of the opinion that this 

device provides a rr.aximum of crypt~graphic security and t~at it is being 

used in an approved manner. 

b. CipC.er device CSP 1127 - The committee feels that this device 

also provides a 1riax.irr:u.T. of cryptogra:]hic security and til.at it is being 

used in an approved nanner. 

c. Strip systems - The cor.r1.ittee recorr.n:ends the following cha.nees 

in the constructior.. :rnC. use of tl.ese syster.:;s & 

(l) Sach vertical systen:. should consist of a different 

alphabet set ar.d .cey list. 

(2) -1. daily word count. of traffic in ea.ci; syste1!l. should be 

c01 .. piled in order that systerr. chan~es r..ay be effected ~ith ~ore accuracy. . 

d. :..., E ::Lrid C syster;.s - 'l'i:e con.rnittee feels th::i.t tC.ese systems do 

not provide the ultimate in security, however, the followine; changes are 

recommended pendini the installation of !!:ore sec.ire syste.r...s: 

(1) That instructions for tl:e use of t::-.ese systems be an;.er.ded 

to perlLit enciphem.ent of succ6eding ir:.u.icators at any 

one of the four positions on each page. 

(2) That each table be used for t~e encipher~ent of any 

nur.~er of groups from 15 to 35 inclusive. 

(3) That a word count be kept on the use of each table so 

that changes rray be made with the proper frequency. 

e. BROWN and GRAY - These unenciphered codes are used for 

restricted traffic onlyand it is considered that they are adequate for this 

purpose. . . .... ~ -
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06871]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-40-2014]


Subzone 38G--Anderson, South Carolina; Application for Production 
Authority Kravet Inc.; Comment Period on Submission of New Evidence

    On May 20, 2014, an application was submitted by the South Carolina 
State Ports Authority, grantee of FTZ 38, requesting production 
authority within Subzone 38G on behalf of Kravet Inc. (Kravet), in 
Anderson, South Carolina. The proposed activity involves the cutting 
and tagging of textiles, paper wall coverings and decorative trimmings 
to be used as commercial samples (79 FR 30078-30079, 5-27-2014).
    On March 13, 2015, Kravet made a submission to the FTZ Board that 
included new evidence in response to the examiner's preliminary 
recommendation not to approve the application. Public comment is 
invited on Kravet's new evidence through April 24, 2015. Rebuttal 
comments may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period, until 
May 11, 2015. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's 
Executive Secretary at: Foreign-Trade Zones Board, U.S. Department of 
Commerce, Room 21013, 1401 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20230.
    A copy of Kravet's March 13, 2015, submission will be available for 
public inspection at the address above, and in the ``Reading Room'' 
section of the FTZ Board's Web site, which is accessible via 
www.trade.gov/ftz.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Whiteman at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#01446d687b60636475692f56696875646c606f4175736065642f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1c597075667d7e796874324b74756879717d725c686e7d7879327b736a">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 482-0473.

    Dated: March 18, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06871 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
RONALD CORDELL

THORTON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2159

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 15, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie Kinsey, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Kevin Steiger, Assistant Public Defender, 

for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 15




Fleming Companies, Inc.
6301 Waterford Boulevard, Box 26647
Oklahoma City, OK  73126

We have made a review, in accordance with standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial information
of Fleming Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the 12 and
40 weeks ended October 2, 1999 and October 3, 1998, as
indicated in our report dated October 19, 1999; because we
did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is
included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 12
and 40 weeks ended October 2, 1999, is incorporated by
reference in the following:

     (i)  Registration Statement No. 2-98602 (1985 Stock Option
          Plan) on Form S-8;

    (ii)  Registration Statement No. 33-36586 (1990 Fleming Stock
          Option Plan) on Form S-8;

   (iii)  Registration Statement No. 33-56241 (Dividend
          Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-3;

    (iv)  Registration Statement No. 333-11317 (1996 Stock
          Incentive Plan) on Form S-8;

     (v)  Registration Statement No. 333-35703 (Senior
          Subordinated Notes) on Form S-4;

    (vi)  Registration Statement No. 333-28219 (Associate Stock
          Purchase Plan) on Form S-8;

   (vii)  Registration Statement No. 333-80445 (1999 Stock
          Incentive Plan) on Form S-8; and

  (viii)  Registration Statement No. 333-89375 (Consolidated
          Savings Plus and Stock Ownership Plan) on Form S-8.


We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant
to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or
certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified
by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of
that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
November 10, 1999
Exhibit31.2

**** 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

 

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated CapitalInstitutional Properties, LP;

 

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)), for theregistrant and have: 

 

(a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b)  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;

 

(c)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(d)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5.   The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and
Memo to the File

RE: Yaquina Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Sites

– Tribal Coordination for Proposed Site

Designations

From: Bridgette Lohrman (ETPA

– Ocean Dumping Program)

Date: May 18, 2012

March 1, 2012. EPA sent letters to the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw

Indians, Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians, Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, and Coquille Indian

Tribe inviting them to consult with EPA on our action of proposing to designate two dredged material

disposal sites approximately 2nm offshore of Yaquina Bay.

April 30, 2012. EPA sent an email to the Tribal staff who received the letter reiterating our invitation for

consultation and attached the original letter to the email. The email stated that if EPA did not hear from

the Tribes by May 14, 2012, EPA would consider the lack of response as a lack of interest to consult.

April 30, 2012

– Staff from the Coquille Indian Tribe and Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde

responded via email stating they do not wish to consult with EPA on this action.

As of the date of this Memo, the Confederated Tribes of the Siletz Indians nor the Confederated Tribes

of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians have responded to EPA. Thus, EPA is considering the lack of

response a lack of interest in consultation and considering we have done our due diligence in following

our Tribal Consultation procedures.
• REF ID:A2~34' w·. 

Subject: Infringement Claim of Edward H. Hebern and Hebern Code, 

Inc. 

SIGLG-3HMS (17 Nov 47) 2nd Ind 

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, OCSigO, Washington 25, D. C., 10 February 1948 

To: Chief, Army Security Agency, The Pentagon, Washington 25, D.C. 

1. In accordance with telephone conversation this date 

between Colonel Hayes and the undersigned, this correspondence is returned for a more definite and complete response to the 

basic letter. 

2. It is highly desirable that this matter be coordinated 

fully with Mr. Stauffer, the patent counsel of the Army Security· Agenc~. 

3. Al though the informa.tion requested in the bssic letter 

will require considerable time e,nd effort, there is no dead.;. 

line, other than a ·reasonable t;l.me, before which the information is needed. 

FOR THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER: 

3 Incls. n/c 

/s/ John E. Pernice 

JOHN E. PERNICE 

Chief, Legal Division 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-13-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

., 

I 

i 

COPY ·_;_ -· 

~· 

i·