alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex_289219.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


 


Amendment No. 1 


To


Renewable Hydrocarbons Purchase and Sale Agreement


 


 


This Amendment (this “Amendment”), made as of October 4, 2021 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), by and Gevo, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Seller”), and Trafigura Trading LLC, a Delaware corporation (“Buyer”), amends the Renewable Hydrocarbons Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of August 14, 2020 (the “Agreement”). Each of Seller and Buyer is referred to in this Amendment as a “Party” and collectively are referred to herein as the “Parties.” Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Agreement shall have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:


	
			1.

				
			Section 2.2(b) is hereby amended by replacing “December 31, 2021” with “June 30, 2022”.

			



 


	
			2.

				
			This Amendment: (a) constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the amendment(s) set forth herein and supersedes all prior understandings, agreements, written or oral, between the parties relating thereto; and (b) shall prevail over any conflicting terms and conditions in the Agreement. Except to the extent amended hereby, the Agreement shall be and remain in full force and effect.

			



 


[Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank]


 





 










 








 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the Amendment Effective Date.


 


 


	Gevo, Inc.	 	Trafigura Trading LLC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Timothy Cesarek	 	/s/ Corey Prologo	 
	Name: Timothy Cesarek	 	Name: Corey Prologo	 
	Title: Chief Commercial Officer	 	Title: Director	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	/s/ Robert Kreider	 
	 	 	Name: Robert Kreider	 
	 	 	Title: Director	 



         






Signature Page – Amendment No. 1 to Purchase and Sale Agreement
# C_2015258EN.01000101.xml

| 7.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

6 August 2015

(2015/C 258/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0885 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,94 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4614 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70140 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5365 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0713 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0260 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,029 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,45 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1846 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4125 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0316 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4849 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4333 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4401 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6665 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5080 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 270,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8905 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7593 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5660 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 724,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2588 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,830 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 69,8530 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,283 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,8273 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8345 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,4082 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0885

JPY

Japanese yen

135,94

DKK

Danish krone

7,4614

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70140

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5365

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0713

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0260

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,029

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,45

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1846

RON

Romanian leu

4,4125

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0316

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4849

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4333

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4401

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6665

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5080

KRW

South Korean won

1 270,42

ZAR

South African rand

13,8905

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7593

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5660

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 724,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2588

PHP

Philippine peso

49,830

RUB

Russian rouble

69,8530

THB

Thai baht

38,283

BRL

Brazilian real

3,8273

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8345

INR

Indian rupee

69,4082

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
MICHAEL A. GREEN,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3494

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Michael A. Green, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44100

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JOEL JODYLEE McDONALD JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 792

Filed: November 29, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bonneville County. Hon. Bruce L. Pickett, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of two years, for fleeing or attempting to elude a peace 

officer, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Joel Jodylee McDonald, Jr. pled guilty to fleeing or attempting to elude a peace officer. 

Idaho Code § 49-1404(1)(2)(a)(b)(c). The district court sentenced McDonald to a unified term 

of five years with two years determinate to run consecutive to sentences in two unrelated cases. 

McDonald appeals asserting that the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive 

sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 
2

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, McDonald’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
99-890.

#### Turner v. Wilkinson.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by Kenneth A. Turner. *Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
# C_2016097EN.01001901.xml

| 12.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/19

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 March 2016

(2016/C 97/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1090 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 126,17 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4598 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,77595 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3090 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0948 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,4360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,059 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,28 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3099 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4669 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1888 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4766 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4698 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6069 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6578 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5271 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 319,89 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,9023 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,2119 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5745 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 484,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5331 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,565 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 77,4590 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,937 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,0401 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 19,6852 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 74,3170 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1090

JPY

Japanese yen

126,17

DKK

Danish krone

7,4598

GBP

Pound sterling

0,77595

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3090

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0948

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,4360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,059

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,28

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3099

RON

Romanian leu

4,4669

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1888

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4766

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4698

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6069

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6578

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5271

KRW

South Korean won

1 319,89

ZAR

South African rand

16,9023

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,2119

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5745

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 484,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5331

PHP

Philippine peso

51,565

RUB

Russian rouble

77,4590

THB

Thai baht

38,937

BRL

Brazilian real

4,0401

MXN

Mexican peso

19,6852

INR

Indian rupee

74,3170

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15857-15858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06900]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting.

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold an Open Meeting on Wednesday, March 
25, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matter of the Open Meeting will be:
    <bullet> The Commission will consider whether to propose amendments 
to Rule 15b9-1 (Exemption for Certain Exchange Members) under the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
    <bullet> The Commission will consider whether to adopt rules and 
forms related to the offer and sale of securities pursuant to Section 
3(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 to implement Section 401 of the 
Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.
    The duty officer determined that no earlier notice thereof was 
possible.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted, or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.


[[Page 15858]]


    Dated: March 20, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06900 Filed 3-23-15; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accessory Specialists Incorporated (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

/s/ Anthony N. DeMint                                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and Chief Accounting Officer

January 26, 2007
#### In the Matter of Michelle Mais, Appellant, v David Jarrett, Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 555]

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hepner, J.), dated January 9, 2003, which denied her objections to an order of the same court (Baur, H.E.), dated October 2, 2002, which, after a hearing, dismissed her petition for an award of child support arrears.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The record supports the Hearing Examiner’s finding that the mother was not entitled to an award of child support arrears *(see Neckers v Neckers,*160 AD2d 693 [1990]; *see also Matter of O’Connor v Curcio,*281 AD2d 100 [2001]; *Parmigiani v Parmigiani,*250 AD2d 744 [1998]). Accordingly, the Family Court correctly denied the mother’s objections. Altman, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
### 1



# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 19

- 1699V Filed: April 27, 2021

* * * * * * * * * * * * * MIR HASSAN
, * UNPUBLISHED

* Petitioner, * Decision on Joint Stipulation;

* Guilla in Barre S yndrom e

v. * ( “ GBS ” ) ; Influenza (“Flu”)

* Vaccine. SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

* Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Nancy Meyers, Esq.
, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC

, for petitioner. Claudia Gan g i, Esq

. , US Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

Roth
, Special Master:

On October 13, 2019
, Mir Hassan [ “ Mr. Hassan ” or “petitioner”] filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program

. 2 Petitioner allege s that he suffered from Guillain Barre Syndrome ( “ GBS ” ) after receiving an influenz a (“flu”) vaccine

on October 12, 2018. Stipulation

, filed April 2 7, 2021 , at ¶¶ 1

- 4. Respondent denies that t he immunization caused petitioner ’s injury. Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Although this Decision has been formally designated “unpublished,” it will nevertheless be posted on the Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. However, the parties may object to the Decision’s inclusion of certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade se cret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the who le Decision will be available to the public. Id

.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Sta t. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ).

### 2

Nevertheless, the parties h ave agreed to settle the case. On April 2 7, 2021 , the p arties filed a joint stipulation agreeing to settle this case and describing the settlement terms.

Respondent agrees to issue the fol lowing payment :

A lump sum of $ 85,000 .00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Mir Hassan

. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would b e av ailable under § 300aa

- 15(a).

I adopt the parties’ stipula tion attached hereto, and award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Mindy Michaels Roth Mindy Michaels Roth Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

**OF**

**Frank Gerardi**

**CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**OF**

**IGI, INC.**

I, Frank Gerardi, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of IGI, Inc., certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IGI, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2006
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

AARON MOHANLAL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1382

[September 20, 2018]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Marc H. Gold, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 04-0020405-CF-10A.

Aaron Mohanlal, Okeechobee, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale 

Surber, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, CONNER and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0575. JEFFERY T. CRYSTAL v. THE STATE.

Jeffery T. Crystal appeals to this Court from the trial court’s denial of his

application for writ of habeas corpus. The Supreme Court, however, has appellate

jurisdiction over habeas corpus cases. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par.

III (4). This appeal is therefore TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/15/2016

November 15, 2016
#### Nicolai and another, Respondents, vs. Wilkins, Appellant.

*November 7*

November *24, 1899.*

*Surface waters: Discharge through artificial channel.*

One landowner cannot lawfully collect the waters accumulating in a marsh or basin on his own land, and discharge them through an artificial channel upon or in close proximity to his neighbor’s land, to such neighbor’s permanent injury.

Appeal from, a judgment of the county court of Waukesha county: M. S. Geiswold, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Pierce, Da/ubner da*Ilolt, and oral argument by *W. A. Pierce-.*

*Lindley Collins,*for the respondents.

WiNslow, J.

This is an action in equity between the same parties who were involved in the action of *Wilkins v. Nicolai,*reported in 99 Wis. 178, and involves cognate questions. In that case the present defendant (WilJdns) was plaintiff, and he sued and obtained a mandatory injunction compelling the present plaintiffs *(Nicolai*and another) to lower a culvert upon their land immediately adjoining the lands of *Wilkins*so as to reopen a drainage ditch which for mauy years had drained an eight-acre marsh on *Wilkins's*land, on the ground that *Wilkins*had acquired a prescriptive right to have such ditch kept open. In the present action it appears by the findings that *Wilkins*has sunk a tile drain, with lateral branches, in and across said eight acres of marsh, for the purpose of underdraining the same, and that such system of tile drainage ends at a point immediately adjoining *Nicolai's*land, near the culvert involved in the former action, at a depth of eight inches below the bottom of the culvert as it was ordered to be placed in the former action, and that by reason of the lowering of said tile drain there is caused a continual flow of water upon *Nicolai's*
      *581premises, coming from the artificial drainage of the marsh, which would not flow there in a state of nature, thus causing permanent injury to said premises. Upon these findings the trial court granted a mandatory injunction requiring *Wilkins*to raise his tile drain to a point on'a level with the bottom of the culvert as it was ordered to be placed in the former action, and enjoining him from lowering the same in the future; and from this judgment *Wilkins*appeals.

The findings are supported by the evidence, and they clearly present a case where a landowner has attempted to collect the waters accumulating in a marsh or basin on his own lands, and discharge them through an artificial channel upon or in close proximity to his neighbor’s land, to such neighbor’s permanent injury. It is well settled that he cannot lawfully do this. The principle has been frequently stated, and no discussion would be profitable. *Schuster v.*Albrecht, 98 Wis. 241.

*By the*Court.— Judgment affirmed.