<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

SAFE HARBOR UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

      The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the "Act") provides
a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide
prospective information about their companies, so long as those statements are
identified as forward-looking and are accompanied by meaningful cautionary
statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to
differ materially from those discussed in the statement. Home City Financial
Corporation ("HCFC") desires to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions
of the Act. Certain information, particularly information regarding future
economic performance and finances and plans and objectives of management,
contained or incorporated by reference in HCFC's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, is forward-looking. In some cases,
information regarding certain important factors that could cause actual results
of operations or outcomes of other events to differ materially from any such
forward-looking statement appears together with such statement. In addition,
forward-looking statements are subject to other risks and uncertainties
affecting the financial institutions industry, including, but not limited to,
the following:

Interest Rate Risk

      HCFC's operating results are dependent to a significant degree on its net
interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans,
investments and other interest-earning assets and interest expense on deposits,
borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. The interest income and
interest expense of HCFC change as the interest rates on interest-earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities change. Interest rates may change because of
general economic conditions, the policies of various regulatory authorities and
other factors beyond HCFC's control. In a rising interest rate environment,
loans tend to prepay slowly and new loans at higher rates increase slowly, while
interest paid on deposits increases rapidly because the terms to maturity of
deposits tend to be shorter than the terms to maturity or prepayment of loans.
Such differences in the adjustment of interest rates on assets and liabilities
may negatively affect HCFC's income.

Possible Inadequacy of the Allowance for Loan Losses

      HCFC maintains an allowance for loan losses based upon a number of
relevant factors, including, but not limited to, trends in the level of
nonperforming assets and classified loans, current and anticipated economic
conditions in the primary lending area, past loss experience, possible losses
arising from specific problem loans and changes in the composition of the loan
portfolio. While the Board of Directors of HCFC believes that it uses the best
information available to determine the allowance for loan losses, unforeseen
market conditions could result in material adjustments, and net earnings could
be significantly adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from
the assumptions used in making the final determination.

      Loans not secured by one to four-family residential real estate are
generally considered to involve greater risk of loss than loans secured by one
to four-family residential real estate due, in part, to the effects of general
economic conditions. The repayment of multifamily residential, nonresidential
real estate and commercial loans generally depends upon the cash flow from the
operation of the property or business, which may be negatively affected by
national and local economic conditions. Construction loans may also be
negatively affected by such economic conditions, particularly loans made to
developers


                                      -70-
<PAGE>

who do not have a buyer for a property before the loan is made. The risk of
default on consumer loans increases during periods of recession, high
unemployment and other adverse economic conditions. When consumers have trouble
paying their bills, they are more likely to pay mortgage loans than consumer
loans. In addition, the collateral securing such loans, if any, may decrease in
value more rapidly than the outstanding balance of the loan.

Competition

Home City Federal Savings Bank of Springfield ("Home City") competes for
deposits with other savings associations, commercial banks and credit unions and
issuers of commercial paper and other securities, such as shares in money market
mutual funds. The primary factors in competing for deposits are interest rates
and convenience of office location. In making loans, Home City competes with
other savings associations, commercial banks, consumer finance companies, credit
unions, leasing companies, mortgage companies and other lenders. Competition is
affected by, among other things, the general availability of lendable funds,
general and local economic conditions, current interest rate levels and other
factors that are not readily predictable. The size of financial institutions
competing with Home City is likely to increase as a result of changes in
statutes and regulations eliminating various restrictions on interstate and
inter-industry branching and acquisitions. Such increased competition may have
an adverse effect upon Home City.

Legislation and Regulation that may Adversely Affect HCFC's Earnings

      Home City is subject to extensive regulation by the Office of Thrift
Supervision (the "OTS") and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
"FDIC") and is periodically examined by such regulatory agencies to test
compliance with various regulatory requirements. As a savings and loan holding
company, HCFC is also subject to regulation and examination by the OTS. Such
supervision and regulation of HCFC and Home City are intended primarily for the
protection of depositors and not for the maximization of shareholder value and
may affect the ability of the company to engage in various business activities.
The assessments, filing fees and other costs associated with reports,
examinations and other regulatory matters are significant and may have an
adverse effect on HCFC's net earnings.

      The FDIC is authorized to establish separate annual assessment rates for
deposit insurance of members of the Bank Insurance fund (the "BIF") and the
Savings Association Insurance Fund (the "SAIF"). The FDIC has established a
risk-based assessment system for both SAIF and BIF members. Under such system,
assessments may vary depending on the risk the institution poses to its deposit
insurance fund. Such risk level is determined by reference to the institution's
capital level and the FDIC's level of supervisory concern about the institution.


                                      -71-