alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7386

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JAMES LARRY BELLAMY, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior 

District Judge. (7:99-cr-00049-F-2; 7:03-cv-00015-F) 

Submitted: December 17, 2009 Decided: December 29, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

James Larry Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

James Larry Bellamy seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 

Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability 

will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bellamy has 

not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Bellamy’s 

motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
# C_2015327EN.01000601.xml

| 3.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 327/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 327/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 327/07)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

To celebrate thirty years of the EU flag, euro-area Finance Ministers decided that euro-area Member States would strike a 2-euro commemorative coin using a common design on the national side. Euro-area citizens and residents have selected by public web-voting the winning design. Voters had a choice of five designs, which had been pre-selected by a professional jury following a design competition among European Mints, and they choose the design created by Mr Georgios Stamatopoulos, professional designer at the Bank of Greece.

Issuing country
  : Ireland

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 30th anniversary of the EU flag

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The designs shows the EU flag as a symbol that unites people and cultures with shared visions and ideals for a better common future. Twelve stars that morph into human figures are embracing the birth of a new Europe. At the top right, in semi-circle, are the issuing country ‘éiRe’ and the years ‘1985-2015’. At the bottom right are the initials of the artist (Georgios Stamatopoulos).

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : October 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary financial information  extracted from financial 
statements  with fiscal year ended September  30, 1998 and is  qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements. 
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          1447444
<SECURITIES>                                     383012
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1968902
<PP&E>                                            96038
<DEPRECIATION>                                    18457
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2096334
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             55450
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                          30
<COMMON>                                          42735
<OTHER-SE>                                      1998119
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2096334
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   1408626
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 5003
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1361191)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1361191)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   64208
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1296983)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.56)
        


</TABLE>
#### ACS State & Local Solutions, Inc., Appellant, v Citicorp Electronic Financial Services, Inc., Respondent.

[771 NYS2d 898]

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered January 6, 2003 and August 12, 2003, respectively, which, to the extent appealable, inter alia, granted defendant’s motions for summary judgment, declaring that defendant’s termination of the subject contracts with plaintiff was valid and otherwise dismissing the complaint, and denied plaintiffs motion for renewal, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

*106The motion court properly concluded that the intention of the parties was fully determinable from the language of the subject agreements *(see Kass v Kass,*91 NY2d 554, 566 [1998]; *Elletson v Bonded Insulation Co.,*272 AD2d 825, 827 [2000]) and that defendant’s termination of those agreements was accomplished in accordance with the agreements’ unambiguous terms.

Plaintiffs motion for renewal was properly denied inasmuch as the purportedly new facts upon which it was premised would not have warranted a change in the prior determination *(see*CPLR 2221 [e] [2]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Ellerin and Marlow, JJ.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S CONSENT


Board of Directors and Shareholders
Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Carpinteria, California

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-64133) on Form S-8 of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries, of our
report dated April 4, 2000 relating to the consolidated balance sheet of
Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1999, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash
flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the December 31, 1999
annual report on Form 10-K of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries.

Our report, date April 4, 2000, contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company has suffered net losses in each of the last four years, has
used cash in its operating activities in each of the last four years, has
disposed of its most significant subsidiary through bankruptcy, is subject to a
lawsuit brought against it by shareholders, and based on the Company's
projected cash flows for the ensuing year it will be required to seek
additional equity or debt financing in order to continue its present
operations. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability
to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these
uncertainties.


McGowan Guntermann

Santa Barbara, California
April 14, 2000
Exhibit 99.1
                                 ------------








                                      13
<PAGE>


COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWABS, INC.
                 CWABS MASTER TRUST, SERIES 2002-H SUBTRUST,
         REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES, SERIES 2002-H


      The undersigned do hereby certify that they are each an officer of
Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. (the "Master Servicer"), and do hereby further
certify pursuant to Section 3.09 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement for the
above-captioned Series (the "Agreement") that:

      (i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
      preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer
      under the Agreement has been made under our supervision; and

      (ii) To the best of our knowledge, based on such review, the Master
      Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
      throughout such year.




/s/Joseph M. Candelario                         Dated: March 27, 2003

JOSEPH M. CANDELARIO
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT AND
COMPLIANCE OFFICER



/s/ Mark Wong                                   Dated: March 27, 2003

MARK WONG
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT


                                      14
EXHIBIT 32.1

              SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report (the "Report") of China
Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter
ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Chris Peng Mao, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August 14, 2007                 By: /s/ Chris Peng Mao
                                          -----------------------------------
                                                  Chris Peng Mao
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-01-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-04-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-26-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             524
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,595
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,508
<INVENTORY>                                    199,756
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               232,142
<PP&E>                                         130,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                  56,407
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 317,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,423
<BONDS>                                         49,684
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            19
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   317,283
<SALES>                                        557,406
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               557,406
<CGS>                                          392,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  392,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                10,225
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,418
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,060
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,728
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,520
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,208
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001021351
<NAME>                        APPLE RESIDENTIAL INCOME TRUST, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                       US$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                            1 
<CASH>                                            40,073,198 
<SECURITIES>                                               0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0 
<INVENTORY>                                                0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 
<PP&E>                                           241,759,925 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     7,686,479 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   281,847,152 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 
<BONDS>                                                    0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0 
<PREFERRED>                                                0 
<COMMON>                                         251,910,553 
<OTHER-SE>                                         2,710,932 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     249,199,621 
<SALES>                                                    0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  30,764,904 
<CGS>                                                      0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     21,585,665 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   737,875 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   10,079,908 
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               10,079,908 
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0 
<CHANGES>                                                  0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      10,079,908 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            .51 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            .51 
                                               



</TABLE>
#### Thornton vs. Eaton.

*Appealable orders.*

1. After judgment, an appeal will not He from an interlocutory order reviewable on appeal from the judgment *( Victor S. M. Co. v. Heller,*41 Wis., 657), as an order “ that judgment be entered by the clerk in accordance with the finding.”

2. Whether an order like that recited would be appealable *before*entry of judgment, is not considered.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Mcmitowoo*County.

Defendant appealed from an order for judgment.

The cause was submitted for the appellant on briefs of *B. P. Eaton.*Eor the respondent, there was a brief by *Nash do Schmitz,*and oral argument by *Mr. Nash.*

Colb, J.

This cause was tried by the court, a j urv having been waived by the parties. The court made and filed a finding of facts, and stated its conclusions of law. At the close of the finding were these words: “ Judgment in accordance with this finding is hereby ordered to be entered by the clerk.” The appeal is from this order or direction of the court. Judgment was in fact immediately entered according to this direction. Uow, waiving the question as to the appealability of such an order where no judgment has in fact been entered, it is very plain that the appeal in this case, under the decisions of this court, must be dismissed. In the case of the *Victor Sewing Machine Co. v.*Heller, 41 Wis., 657, it was held that, after judgment, an appeal would not lie from an order refusing a new trial, or from any other interlocutory order which is reviewable on appeal from the judgment itself. That decision is decisive on this appeal, for the reason that judgment in the cause had been entered, from which an appeal might have been taken.

*By the Court.*— The appeal is dismissed.

Evan, O. J., took no part.

A motion by the appellant for. a rehearing was denie'd.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          76,964
<SECURITIES>                                    31,609
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,387
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,668
<PP&E>                                          28,283
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,022
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,772
<BONDS>                                            653
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          9
<COMMON>                                         2,967
<OTHER-SE>                                     170,132
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   217,689
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,252
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   82,339
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,955
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 212
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,337
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,395
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,909
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,909
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.50
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015294EN.01000101.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 294/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 279, 24.8.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 270, 17.8.2015

OJ C 262, 10.8.2015

OJ C 254, 3.8.2015

OJ C 245, 27.7.2015

OJ C 236, 20.7.2015

OJ C 228, 13.7.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32.1



SOHU.COM INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify,
pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2004 and results of
operations of the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.



/s/ Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of DirectorsNovember 9, 2004