alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06877]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[Docket No. 50-255-LA-2; ASLBP No. 15-939-04-LA-BD01]


Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc.; Establishment of Atomic Safety 
and Licensing Board

    Pursuant to delegation by the Commission, see 37 FR 28,710 (Dec. 
29, 1972), and the Commission's regulations, see, e.g., 10 CFR 2.104, 
2.105, 2.300, 2.309, 2.313, 2.318, 2.321, notice is hereby given that 
an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (Board) is being established to 
preside over the following proceeding:

Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (Palisades Nuclear Plant)

    This proceeding involves an application by Entergy Nuclear 
Operations, Inc. (Entergy) for a license amendment for Palisades 
Nuclear Plant, located in Van Buren County, Michigan. In response to a 
notice filed in the Federal Register, see 80 FR 520, 523 (Jan. 6, 
2015), a Petition to Intervene was filed on March 9, 2015 by Beyond 
Nuclear; Don't Waste Michigan; Michigan Safe Energy Future--Shoreline 
Chapter; and the Nuclear Energy Information Service.
    The Board is comprised of the following administrative judges:

Ronald M. Spritzer, Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, 
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Gary S. Arnold, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001
Dr. Thomas J. Hirons, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel, U.S. 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001

    All correspondence, documents, and other materials shall be filed 
in accordance with the NRC E-Filing rule. See 10 CFR 2.302.

    Dated: March 19, 2015, Rockville, Maryland.
E. Roy Hawkens,
Chief Administrative Judge, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-06877 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
Exhibit 4.14




Orckit Communications Ltd.





Summary Terms and Conditions of


Convertible Notes Issued June 6, 2011




1. Type of Offering





On June 6, 2011, Orckit Communications Ltd. (the “Company”) issued Series B convertible notes (the “Notes”) in a public offering pursuant to a prospectus dated April 15, 2011 (as amend on May 15, 2011 and May 29, 2011) and Trust Deed, dated April 13, 2011 (as amend on May 11, 2011 and May 26, 2011), with Ziv Haft Trusts Company Ltd., as trustee for the holders of Notes.  Pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the offering was made solely in Israel to residents thereof.  The Notes are listed for trade on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.





2. Amount of Issuance, Denomination and Issuance Price





The Company issued Notes with an aggregate principal amount of 30,779,000 New Israeli Shekels (“NIS”) (approximately $9.0 million at the time).  The Notes were issued at a purchase price equal to 94% of their nominal value, or NIS 940 per unit (each unit comprised of NIS 1,000 principal amount).





3. Repayment of Principal





The principal is repayable in one installment on December 31, 2017.





4. Interest





The Notes bear interest at an annual rate of eight percent (8%).  The interest is payable semi-annually on June 30th and December 31st of each of the years 2011 through 2017 (inclusive) commencing June 30, 2011.





5.        Linkage





The principal of the Notes, and the interest that shall accrue thereon, will not be linked to the Israeli Consumer Price Index.





6.        Security





The Notes are unsecured.





7.        Conversionat the Option of each Note Holder





The Notes are convertible into Ordinary Shares, no par value, of the Company, on any trading day until December 15, 2017, at the election of the holder.  The conversion price is NIS 10.00 (approximately $2.95 based on the U.S. Dollar/NIS exchange rate at June 12, 2011) per share.





The Ordinary Shares issued upon conversion of the Notes will be listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq Stock Market.





The conversion price is subject to adjustment in the event that the Company effects a share split or reverse share split, a distribution of bonus shares or cash dividend, or performs a rights offering.





8.        Conversion at the Option of the Company





The Company is not entitled to force the conversion of the Notes.





9.        Repurchase Right of the Company





The Company is entitled to repurchase any Notes, at any time and from time to time, in private transactions or in transactions on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange. Any Notes repurchased by the Company will be canceled and may not be reissued.  Notes purchased by a subsidiary of the Company will continue to be deemed outstanding and subject to transfer.
# C_2015047EN.01000101.xml

| 10.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7342 — Alcoa/Firth Rixson)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 47/01)

On 12 November 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7342. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7342. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

99-1272.

#### Seven Hills Schools v. Tracy.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 97-M-1572. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, dismissed.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Exhibit 4.5


 


	0	Incorporated
under the laws of the State of Delaware	******



 


Better Therapeutics, Inc.


 




TOTAL AUTHORIZED ISSUE

200,000,000 SHARES PAR VALUE $0.0001


COMMON STOCK


 


This is to Certify that *******************               is
the owner of


 


*********** *                         
fully paid and non-assessable shares of the above Corporation transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder
thereof in person or by duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed


 


Witness,
the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.


 


 Dated October      , 2021


 


 


	Chief Executive Officer	 	Secretary



 






    


     


    

 


The following abbreviations, when
used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were, written out in full according to applicable
laws or regulations:


 


	TEN COM	—	as tenants in common	UNIF GIFT MIN ACT	—	 	Custodian	 
	TEN ENT	—	as tenants by the entireties	 	 	(Cust)	 	(Minor)
	 	 	 	 	 	under Uniform Gifts to Minors Act


  


	JT TEN	—	as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common	
     

     
	Act                                                                         
	 	 	 	 	(State)


     Additional abbreviations
may also be used though not in the above list.


 


For value received,                    hereby sells, assigns and transfers
unto


PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER


IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


	 	


 





 



 





 






(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING
ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)


 





 



 





 



 


	 	shares of the 






 represented by the within Certificate,
and do hereby irrevocably constitutes and appoints


 





	 	Attorney to





 transfer the said Shares on the books
of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.


 


Dated:                                                                     


 


In Presence of                                                                                                                                                                                                                          


                                                      


 


NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME
AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10.31(b)
                                                           LOAN #8028476243-0001



                             MODIFICATION AGREEMENT

         THIS MODIFICATION AGREEMENT is entered into by and between BOBBY
ALLISON WIRELESS, INC. (hereinafter "Borrower") and COLONIAL BANK (hereinafter
"Lender").

         WHEREAS, Lender heretofore made a loan in the amount of $1,500,000.00
to Borrower, as evidenced by that certain Note dated February 23, 2000
(hereafter "Note").

         WHEREAS, Borrower has requested that the maturity date of the loan be
modified from May 2, 2000 to January 31, 2001.

         WHEREAS, Lender is agreeable to make such changes.

         NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and other good and
valuable consideration, Lender and Borrower agree and make the following changes
to the Note:

         1. Change the existing maturity date of the Note from May 2, 2000
            to January 31, 2001.
         2. All other terms of the Note will remain unchanged.

         BORROWER HEREBY AGREES and directs Lender to take any action necessary
to conform the Note, or the documents referred to in the Note or pertaining to
the Note, to the terms herein cited, and by these presents, accepts and confirms
their liability under said Note, and documents referred to in the Note or
pertaining to the Note, with the terms as herein modified.

         BORROWER FURTHER AGREES that the herein Modification Agreement and the
modifications to the Note shall in no way affect or release any collateral held
by Lender as security or guarantee on said Note and same shall continue to
secure and guarantee said Note as modified.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Modification
Agreement effective as of the 23rd day of February, 2000.



<PAGE>   2


                   CAUTION - IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU THOROUGHLY
                     READ THIS CONTRACT BEFORE YOU SIGN IT.


BORROWER:                                    BOBBY ALLISON WIRELESS, INC.



                                             By: /s/ Robert L. McGinnis
                                                 --------------------------
                                             Its: CEO
                                                 --------------------------


LENDER:                                      COLONIAL BANK



                                             By: /s/ Alan Dobbins
                                                 --------------------------
                                             Its: Assistant Vice President
                                                 --------------------------
HENRY JAMES LAGI

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FIL ED

CASE NO. 1D 17

- 1609

Opinion filed May 17, 2017.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Henry James Lagi, pro se

, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMIS SED. See Logan v. State , 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2004).

WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
### ^ T rr-:-':c;y->-;T'~in\ ! 

# ALASK AJUNEA U Answer to Motio n to reope n Selectio n o f Carrier s for

Docket s 2002 - 1201 4 an d2008-021 7 Alask aJuneau Aeronautics , Inc . ("AJA" ) object s t o Air Excursions , L.L.C.' s ("AE" ) Motio n t o Reope n th e Selectio n o f Carrier s date dFebruar

y 2,201 0 for

th e followin g reasons . AE' s allegatio n tha t AJAdoe s hav e th e necessar yCaravan' s t o fulfil l it s contractua l obligation s t o th e Departmen t t o provid e ai rservic e t o Kak e an d Excursio n Inle t A

KI s false . AJAcurrentl ylease s 2 Caravan s an d 3 Cessn a 207 s an d v/il l continu e t o hav e th e neede d aircraf t t o mee t it s contractua l obligation s t o th e DOT . AE' s allegatio n tha t AJAha s over-charge d th e Departmen t b ysubstitutin g aircraf t i s false . AJAbill s th e Departmen t $307.5 4 fo rdeparture s i n a C20 8 an d $170.8 6 fo rdeparture s i n a C207 . Thi s represent s a 45 % saving s t o th e departmen t whic h i s mor e tha n th e cos t differenc e Mr . Myer s claim s o f 40% . Th e reductio n i n subsid yi s b ydeparture , s o i t automaticall yaccount s fo rth e differenc e i n indirec t expense . AJ Acoul d hav e ru n th e mor e expensiv e aircraf t o n th e rout e an d needlessl ybille d th e departmen t fo rempt yseats . However , thi s seem s fiscall yirresponsible . AE' s allegation s tha t AJAhas no t flow n al l require d flight s t o Kak e an d Excursio n Inle t I s false . AJAha s complete d ever yfligh t t o thes e communitie s tha t wer e saf e t o d o so . AJAha s don e s o I n th e mos t efficien t aircraf t possible . I n n o cas e di d w e tur n passenge rtraffi c awa y t o fl ya smalle raircraft . Contrar yt o AE' s allegations , AJ Aha s actuall ygon e beyon d it s contractua l obligation s a s follows : 1 . Eve n thoug h onl ycontractuall yobligate d t o provid e tw o roun d trip s pe rday , AJA provide d thre e roun d trip s las t summe ra t ou row n rislc . Additionally , th e statistic s provide d en d las t Novembe r2009 , i n Decembe r200 9 AJ Afle wever

ytri p t o Kak

e i n a C208 . 2 . I n abou t tw o month s AJ Awil l hav e it s entir e inventor ydistribute d o n al l on-lin e trave l agencie s (Expedia , Travelocity , etc. ) Thi s leve l visibilit yi n th e globa l distributio n syste m i s unprecedente d fo rthes e rura l communities . AJ Aha s take n thi s ste p a t it s ow n expens e an d outsid e o f th e cost s contemplate d I n it s origina l bid .



### 842 1 Livingsto n Wa

y • Juneau , A K

9980 1 • 907-789-079 0

# ALASK A JUNEA U

W e submi t

tha t AJ A ha s faithfully , an ddiligentl y uphel dit s obligation s t o th e departmen t

an dth e communities , that Ai r Excursion' s fals e accusation s shoul db e disregarded , an dthat

thei r Motio n shoul db e denied . Sincerely ,

Ro b McKlnne y Presiden t Alask a Junea u Aeronautics , Inc .



### 842 1 Livingsto n Wa

y • Juneau , A

K 9980 1 • 907-789-079 0
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 262 

To allow tax credits to State and local governments for paid sick leave 

and paid family and medical leave. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2021 

Ms. SMITH (for herself, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Finance 

A BILL 

To allow tax credits to State and local governments for 

paid sick leave and paid family and medical leave. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Supporting State and 

5 Local Leaders Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ALLOWED TAX 

7 CREDITS FOR PAID SICK AND PAID FAMILY 

8 AND MEDICAL LEAVE. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Sections 7001(e)(4) and 

10 7003(e)(4) of the Families First Coronavirus Response 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 262 IS

1 Act are each amended by striking ‘‘, the government of 

2 any State or political subdivision thereof, or any agency 

3 or instrumentality of any of the foregoing’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘or any agency or instrumentality of the United States’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 this section shall take effect as if included in the provisions 

7 of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act to which 

8 they relate. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Onyca M., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 548]

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.), entered on or about March 13, 2003, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted assault in the third degree, and placed her on probation for a period of two years, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence *(see People v Bleakley,*69 NY2d 490 [1987]). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility. The victim explicitly testified that her identification of appellant was based on her personal observations. We have considered and rejected appellant’s remaining arguments. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sullivan, Friedman and Gonzalez, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,046
<ALLOWANCES>                                       150
<INVENTORY>                                     78,898
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,775
<PP&E>                                          35,492
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,683
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 132,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           36,164
<BONDS>                                         66,667
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           193
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,583
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   132,624
<SALES>                                        296,655
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               296,655
<CGS>                                          214,345
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   56,915
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (220)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,928
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 16,247
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (2,833)<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 (2,739)<F2>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,594
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<FN>
<F1>REPRESENTS INCOME TAX BENEFIT
<F2>REPRESENTS, NET OF TAX, THE PREMIUM PAID ON REDEMPTION OF SENIOR NOTES 
PLUS THE WRITE-OFF OF ONE THIRD OF THE UNAMORTIZED DEFERRED FINANCING FEES.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                              EXHIBIT 21


Subsidiaries of the Company

1.  Response Ability Systems, Inc.; incorporated in New Jersey.

2.  Emergency Response Systems, Inc.; incorporated in Delaware; also does
    business in the state of California under the name Personal Emergency
    Response Systems, Inc.

3.  Organization for Enhanced Capability, Inc.; incorporated in Massachusetts.

4.  In-Home Health, Inc.; incorporated in Ohio.

5.  Response Security Monitoring, LLC; formed in Delaware.

6.  Response Security Services, LLC; formed in Delaware.

7.  Health Watch, Inc.; incorporated in Florida.
*Exhibit      32.2*

**CERTIFICATION**

| 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d), as                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  at the dates and for the periods                  indicated. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                   |                                                                                                |                                      |
|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                                                                |
|                              |                                                                                           |                                 |
| Date: March              15, 2006 | By:                                                                                       | /s/ RICHARD              BLASS  |
|                                   |                                                                                                     |
|                                   | Title:  *Executive              Vice President and**Chief              Financial Officer* |
September 2, 2015

MEMO to Docket EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2011

- 0817
FROM: Sharon Nizich , US EPA SUBJECT: Meeting with Portland Cement Association Members

A meeting was held August 10 th 2015 to discuss errors found in the July 27 th 2015 promulgated final amendments for the National Emissions S tandards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, Portland Cement Manufacturing Plants. No errors were discovered in the New Source Performance Standards, of the July 27 th 2015 amendment.

In attendance:

US EPA
Sharon Nizich Keith Barn ett Robin Segall Stef Johnson

John Holmes , Portland Cement Association
Jim Wheeler, Emissions Monitoring Inc.