alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 65 (Monday, April 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 18402]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06876]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9925-22-OA]


Notice of Meeting of the EPA's Children's Health Protection 
Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act, Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the next meeting of 
the Children's Health Protection Advisory Committee (CHPAC) will be 
held April 21 and 22, 2015 at the Sheraton Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia 
Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. The CHPAC was created to advise 
the Environmental Protection Agency on science, regulations, and other 
issues relating to children's environmental health.

DATES: The CHPAC will meet April 21 and 22, 2015.

ADDRESSES: 8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20910.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Berger, Office of Children's 
Health Protection, USEPA, MC 1107A, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20460, (202) 564-2191 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#204245524745520e4d4152544841604550410e474f56"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e5c5b4c595b4c10535f4c4a565f7e5b4e5f10595148">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meetings of the CHPAC are open to the 
public. The CHPAC will meet on April 21 from 12:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., 
and April 22 from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Sheraton Silver Spring, 
8777 Georgia Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20910. An agenda will be 
posted at epa.gov/children.
    Access and Accommodations: For information on access or services 
for individuals with disabilities, please contact Martha Berger at 202-
564-2191 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe9c9b8c999b8cd0939f8c8a969fbe9b8e9fd0999188"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ae8eff8edeff8a4e7ebf8fee2ebcaeffaeba4ede5fc">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Martha Berger,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. 2015-06876 Filed 4-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 10.41
 [ * ] denotes confidential information omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to a request for confidential treatment under Rule 24b-2 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 AMENDMENT TO THE
XBOX 360 PUBLISHER LICENSE AGREEMENT  (Xbox V1 Games Distributed via Games on Demand)
 ,
 RECITALS
    1. Defined Terms.
 Game Selection and License.
 3. Game Removal.
 4. Term.
 *Information has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




---



##### 



5. Territory.
 6. Games on Demand Online Content
    7. Marketing Materials.
 8. Game Rating.
  MICROSOFT LICENSING, GP
    
    
    
    MIDWAY HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC./s/ Astrid B. Ford
    
    
    
    /s/ Miguel IribarrenBy (sign)
    
    
    
    By (sign)Astrid B. Ford
    
    
    
    Miguel IribarrenName (Print)
    
    
    
    Name (Print)Sr. Program Mgr
    
    
    
    VP-PublishingTitle
    
    
    
    Title02.07.08
    
    
    
    1-30-08Date (Print mm/dd/yy)
    
    
    
    Date (Print mm/dd/yy)
 *Information has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 Microsoft
Confidential




---



##### 



ATTACHMENT A
       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE SIGNED THIS AGREEMENT AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE.
 MIDWAY HOME ENTERTAINMENT INC.
    
    
    
    MICROSOFT LICENSING, GPBY:
    
    
    
    
    
    BY:NAME:
    
    
    
    
    
    NAME:TITLE:
    
    
    
    
    
    TITLE:
 *Information has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to a request for confidential treatment pursuant to Rule 24b-2 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 Microsoft Confidential
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 20 , 2015

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 15

- 00552

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF E .E.B AND J.E.B., Children

On Appeal from the 312th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2014

- 36413

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed March 27, 2015 . The notice of appeal was filed June 25, 2015

. A ppellant filed an affidavit to proceed without advance payment of costs on appeal. On July 22, 2015, the trial court signed an order sustaining a contest to appellant’s claim of indigence. Appellant did not file a motion challenging the trial court’s order. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1(j)(2). On August 18 , 2015, appellant was ordered to pay the filing fee on or before September 2, 2015. On that date, appellant filed a motion to abate and remand this appeal to the trial court for an out

- of

- time challeng e to the trial court’s order2 sustaining the contest. Th e record of the hearing on the contest reflects appellant was present at the hearing when the trial court sustained the contest. The motion to
abate was denied and o n September 22 , 2015, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate filing fee on or be fore October 2 , 2015, or the appeal would be
dismissed.
Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee. Accordingly, the appeal is
ordered dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3 (c) (allowing involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comp ly with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jamison, McCally and Wise.
# C_2015051EN.01000501.xml

| 13.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/5

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7416 — RREEF/ECE/Palaisquartier)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 51/03)

On 18 November 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7416. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7416. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 

**Exhibit 31. 1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEFEXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I,Richard K. Williams, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Advanced Analogic Technologies Incorporated, a Delawarecorporation, for the second quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission; 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respectto the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in thisreport, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) [Intentionally omitted pursuantto SEC rules] 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 3, 2006
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                               UNITED STATES CODE)


I, David V. Lott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Showintel  Networks,
Inc.;

2. Based on my  knowledge,  this  quarterly  report  does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not  misleading  with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information  included in this quarterly  report,  fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition,  results of operations,  and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;

4. As the registrant's certifying officer, I am responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed  such  disclosure  controls and  procedures  to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures  as of a date  within  90  days  prior  to the  filing  date  of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this quarterly report are conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on my  evaluation  as of  the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's auditors and the registrant's board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant  deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability  to record,  process,
summarize and report  financial data and have  identified  for the  registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could  significantly  affect internal controls  subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: Sept 30, 2003

/s/ David V. Lott
-------------------------
David V. Lott
President
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




        In connection with the Annual Report on From 10-KSB of Computerized
Thermal Imaging, Inc. (the "Company") for the Year Ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard V. Secord, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard V. Secord
------------------------
Richard V. Secord
Chief Executive Officer
October 27, 2005

      This certification accompanies the Amendment pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or it
staff upon request.
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-13825

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:14-cr-00208-WSD-RGV-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PHYLLIS GRANT,

a.k.a. Phyllis Williams,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Georgia

________________________

(November 21, 2016)

Before ED CARNES, Chief Judge, ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, and 

CHAPPELL,* District Judge.

__________ 

*Honorable, Sheri Polster Chappell, United States District Judge for the Middle District of 

Florida, sitting by designation.

Case: 15-13825 Date Filed: 11/21/2016 Page: 1 of 3 
2

PER CURIAM: 

We have had the benefit of oral argument, and have carefully studied the 

briefs and relevant parts of the record. We conclude that the judgment of the 

district court shall be affirmed. We conclude that the district court did not abuse 

its discretion in excluding certain parts of the proposed testimony of Dr. 

Schwenke. Fed.R.Evid. 704(b) provides: “In a criminal case, an expert witness 

must not state an opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental 

state or condition that constitutes an element of the crime charged or of a defense. 

Those matters are for the trier of fact alone.” The excluded testimony was an 

“opinion about whether the defendant did or did not have a mental state ... that 

constitutes an element of the crime charged.

Defendant’s challenge to the district court’s enhancement of her offense 

level under Guideline §2B1.1(b)(2)(C) is without merit. That Guideline provides 

for a six-level enhancement if the conspiracy involved more than 250 victims. 

Assuming arguendo, as defendant urges, that the term “victim” does not include a 

person who allows his or her personal information to be used in a fraudulent tax 

return, there was ample evidence to support the district court’s finding that there 

were more than 250 victims. More than 350 fraudulent returns were received in 

the post office boxes which defendant opened and at defendant’s own personal 

address – all addresses which defendant knowingly permitted Henry to use in his 

Case: 15-13825 Date Filed: 11/21/2016 Page: 2 of 3 
3

fraudulent return scheme. Defendant’s argument that the term “victim” should not 

include individuals who willingly allowed their personal identification information 

to be used – i.e., were complicit – is based on the evidence that defendant provided 

to Henry the personal identification information about several of her relatives who 

may have been complicit in the charged conspiracy. However, there was ample 

evidence to support the district court’s finding that the number of such possibly 

complicit individuals could not have reduced the more than 350 fraudulent returns 

proven to less than the 250 victims necessary to support the six-level enhancement.

Other arguments of defendant on appeal are without merit and warrant no 

discussion. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Case: 15-13825 Date Filed: 11/21/2016 Page: 3 of 3
# C_2015357EN.01000301.xml

| 29.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 357/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Lithuania

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The Lithuanian language

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design shows the word ‘AČIŪ’(THANK YOU) — one of the most beautiful words in the Lithuanian language. An original Lithuanian font — created specially on the basis of the Latin font for the occasion of the centenary of the restoration of Lithuanian press — in order to match better the combinations of letters used most in the Lithuanian language, is used in the project. All the letters of the Lithuanian language are depicted on the background of the word ‘AČIŪ’, laid out in a tag cloud. At the bottom is the name of the issuing country ‘LIETUVA’ and underneath the name is the year ‘2015’. At the bottom right, under the word ‘AČIŪ’ is the mint mark of the Lithuanian Mint.

Description of the design

(THANK YOU)

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : December 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# C_2015175EN.01000101.xml

| 29.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7597 — Sabadell/TSB)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 175/01)

On 18 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7597. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7597. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---