alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.1
 SECTION
302 CERTIFICATION
 
 I,
Michael S. Wasik, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10−KSB of RoomLinX, Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual
report.
 
 4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a−15(e) and 15d−15(e) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 (a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 
 b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.
 
 
 Date:
              7/1/08By:
              /s/ Michael S.
      WasikMichael
      S. WasikChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 32.2

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Carol Yu, Co-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2010 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2010.



/s/ Carol YuCarol Yu, Co-President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 7, 2010
Exhibit 32.1



SOHU.COM INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify,
pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2004 and results of
operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2004.



/s/    Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board of DirectorsMay 10,
2004
EXHIBIT
31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 
 I, F.
William Kuethe, Jr. , certify
that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Glen Burnie Bancorp;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 
 (a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;
 
 (b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures
      and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
      the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period
      covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and
 
 (c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent
      fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
      annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting; and
 
 5.  The
Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of Registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 (a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and
 
 (b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control
      over financial reporting.
 
 ****Date: March 10,
2005
    By:
    /s/ F. William Kuethe,
      Jr.F. William Kuethe, Jr.Chief
      Executive Officer
CLD

- 164 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 13

- 4388

___________ DAVID MEYERS ,

Appellant

v. WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP; U.S. ATTORNEY MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

_______________________________ _____ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civil No. 1

- 13

- cv - 01630 ) District Judge: Honorable John E

. Jones, III

____________________________________ Submitted for Possible Dismissal Due to a Juri sdictional Defect or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 January 30, 2014 Before: FUENTES, JORDAN and SHWARTZ , Circuit Judges

( F iled : February 3, 2014 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM David Meyers f

iled a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. At the time he filed the petition, Meyers was incarcerated at Riverside Regional Jail in Hopewell,2

Virginia. M eyers named as respondents to his petition, inter alia, a prison official associated with the United States Penitentiary in Allenwood, Pennsylvania. In his petition, Meyers sought review of past sentence calculations and credits. The District
Court dismi ssed Meyers’ petition after determining that he named the wrong respondent and filed his petition in the wrong jurisdiction. Meyers appeals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253(a). In our review of the District Court’s order di smissing the § 2241 petition we “exercise plenary review over the District Court’s legal conclusions and apply a clearly erroneous standard to its findings of fact.” O’Donald v. Johns , 402 F.3d 172, 173 n.1 (3d Cir. 2005). We may summarily affirm if the appeal does not present a substantial question. See 3d Cir. LAR 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6. We conclude that the District Court correctly dismissed Meyers’ petition. “[F]or core habeas petitions challenging present physical confinement, jurisdiction lies in only one district: the district of confinement.” Rumsfeld v. Padilla , 542 U.S. 426, 443 (2004). Accordingly, “[w]henever a § 2241 habeas petitioner seeks to challenge his present physical custody within the United States, he should name his warden as respond ent and file the petition in the district of confinement.” Id. at 447. Jurisdictional issues related to a prisoner’s custody are determined as of the date the habeas petition is filed. See Leyva v. Williams , 504 F.3d 357, 363 (3d Cir. 2007); Chong v. Di st. Dir., INS , 264 F.3d 378,
382

- 83 (3d Cir. 2001). At the time Meyers filed his petition, he was not confined within the Middle District of Pennsylvania and none of the respondents were his warden. Accordingly, the District Court properly dismissed Meye rs’ petition.3

For the foregoing reasons, this appeal presents no substantial question and we will summarily affirm the District Court’s judgment. Murray v. Bledsoe , 650 F.3d 246, 247 (3d Cir. 2011) (per curiam); see 3d Cir. LAR 27.4; I.O.P. 10.6.
#### Paggeot and others vs. Sexton, impleaded, etc.

Where a finding embraced numerous distinct facts, a general exception “ to eacb and every finding of fact *”*therein, *held*insufficient.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Milwauleee*County.

*levi Hubbell,*for appellants.

*Butler dé Winlder,*for respondent.

DixoN, C. J.

The judgment in this case must be affirmed. The appellants seek a review of the facts found by the court *196below; but the exception taken is wholly insufficient for that purpose. The finding is long, and the facts very numerous; arid the exception in these words : “ The plaintiffs except to each and every finding of fact and facts in the said written finding of the judge contained.” Within the decisions both of this court and of the courts of New York, such an exception amounts to nothing. *Taft v. Kessel,*16 Wis. 273; *Gilman v. Theiss,*18 id. 528; *Ludlow v.*Gilman, id. 552; *Smith v. Coolbaugh,*21 id. 427; 17 id. 665; 11 id. 160; *Newell v. Doty,*33 N. Y. 83; *Lawrence v. Fowler,*20 How. Pr. R. 407. The counsel for the appellants suggests, that the rule established by these decisions prevails only in cases at law, and not in cases in equity. It will be seen that most of the cases in this court were cases in *equity;*and we think there can be no distinction between actions at law and suits in equity, in this respect. The distinction between actions at law and suits in equity, and the forms of all such actions and suits heretofore existing, are abolished; and it is obvious, from the language of the statute regulating appeals, writs of error, etc., that exceptions must be taken in every case alike. The intention was to establish, as nearly as possible, a uniform practice in all cases, whether legal or equitable; and this court has accordingly so held.

*By the Qo%t/rt.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of China  Biopharmaceuticals  Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
each of the  undersigned,  in the capacities  and on the date  indicated  below,
hereby  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1) The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                           /s/ Chris Peng Mao
                           -----------------------------
                           Chris Peng Mao
                           Chief Executive Officer
                           May 15, 2009
# C_2015093EN.01000801.xml

| 20.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 March 2015

(2015/C 93/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0677 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4508 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2797 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0595 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6355 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,425 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,22 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1288 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4170 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7776 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3966 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3578 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2842 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4453 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4809 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 197,86 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0815 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,6140 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6500 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 932,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9555 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 47,979 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,1691 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,997 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4740 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3091 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,8199 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0677

JPY

Japanese yen

129,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4508

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71830

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2797

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0595

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6355

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,425

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,22

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1288

RON

Romanian leu

4,4170

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7776

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3966

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3578

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2842

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4453

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4809

KRW

South Korean won

1 197,86

ZAR

South African rand

13,0815

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,6140

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6500

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 932,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9555

PHP

Philippine peso

47,979

RUB

Russian rouble

64,1691

THB

Thai baht

34,997

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4740

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3091

INR

Indian rupee

66,8199

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), As Adopted

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Southeastern Banking Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Cornelius P. Holland, III, President & Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, and Alyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CORNELIUS P. HOLLAND, IIICornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO/s/ ALYSON G. BEASLEYAlyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer


Date: August 14, 2007
# C_2015145EN.01002901.xml

| 1.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/29

---

Corrigendum to Public holidays in 2015

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 463 of 23 December 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 463 of 23 December 2014

(2015/C 145/12)

On page 17, for France:

for:

for:

‘1.1, 6.4, 1.5, 14.5, 25.5, 14.7, 21.7, 15.8, 1.11, 11.11, 25.12’,

read:

read:

‘1.1, 6.4, 1.5, 8.5, 14.5, 25.5, 14.7, 15.8, 1.11, 11.11, 25.12’.

---
**CERTIFICATIONS                                                             Exhibit 31.10**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thomas Liguori

Vice President, Finance and

Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                              46
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,888
<ALLOWANCES>                                       139
<INVENTORY>                                      7,025
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,995
<PP&E>                                           1,912
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,407
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,157
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,077
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            42
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,943)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,407
<SALES>                                          5,894
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,894
<CGS>                                            4,442
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 418
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (267)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (267)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (151)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (450)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015356EN.01000801.xml

| 28.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/8

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 356/06)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

To celebrate 30 years of the EU flag, euro-area Finance Ministers decided that euro-area Member States would strike a 2-euro commemorative coin using a common design on the national side. Euro-area citizens and residents have selected by public web-voting the winning design. Voters had a choice of five designs, which had been pre-selected by a professional jury following a design competition among European Mints, and they choose the design created by Mr Georgios Stamatopoulos, professional designer at the Bank of Greece.

Issuing country
  : Malta

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 30th anniversary of the EU flag

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The designs shows the EU flag as a symbol that unites people and cultures with shared visions and ideals for a better common future. Twelve stars that morph into human figures are embracing the birth of a new Europe. At the top is the issuing country ‘MALTA’ and at the right the years ‘1985-2015’. At the bottom right are the initials of the artist (Georgios Stamatopoulos).

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : November 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 18, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 18, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0372. HEIDI K. COOPER v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC..

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.