alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 3.04



[GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]



I, HARRIET SMITH WINDSOR, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE ATTACHED IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
AMENDMENT OF FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC., FILED IN THIS OFFICE ON THE TWENTY-FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST, A.D. 2000, AT 10:44 OCLOCK A.M.



|                |  |                       
|--------------- |  | ----------------------
|                |  | [GRAPHIC APPEARS HERE]
|                |  | Harriet Smith Windsor,
|                |  | Secretary of State    
|                |  |                       
|2035152    8100 |  |                       
|                |  |                       
|030422741       |  |                       



---

CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE



CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF



FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC.



FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY THAT:



1. In accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, an amendment to
the Certificate of Incorporation of this Corporation has been duly adopted by the Corporation.



2. Said amendment amends the first paragraph of ARTICLE FOURTH to the Certificate of Incorporation to read as follows:



The Corporation is authorized to issue three classes of shares to be
designated as Preferred Stock, Class A Common Stock and Class B Non-Voting Common Stock. The total number of shares of Preferred Stock the Corporation shall have authority to issue shall be 100,000, $.10 par value, and the total number of shares of
Class A Common Stock the Corporation shall have the authority to issue shall be 100,000,000, $.000006 par value, and the total number of shares of Class B Non-Voting Common Stock the Corporation shall have the authority to issue shall be 6,200,000,
$.000006 par value.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, FIREARMS
TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC. has caused this Certificate of Amendment to be signed this 25th day of August, 2000.



FIREARMS TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC.By:

/s/    JOHN A. MORELLIJohn A. MorelliSecretary




STATE OF DELAWARE SECRETARY OF STATE DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS FILED 10:44 AM 08/25/2000 0001431123
- 2035152
No. 12763 INTHE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1974

MICHAEL MELVINWITSOE, Petitioner,

THE HONORABLE ROBERT J. NELSON etal., Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING: Counsel of Record: For Petitioner: E. F. Gianotti argued, Great Falls, Montana For Respondent: Honorable Robert L. Woodahl, Attorney General, Helena,

Montana J. Fred Bourdeau, County Attorney, Great Falls, Montana Norman L. Newhall I11 argued, Great Falls, Montana

Submitted: June 14, 1974 Decided:

## Ja 91

## 1974 Filed: 

### JUL

## 311974PER CURIAM: This is a petition for writ of certiorari seeking a reviewby this Court of the action of the Honorable R. J. Nelson, Judge of the Eighth Judicial District in Cascade County. The petitioner alleges that the trial judge erroneously ordered him to furnishnames of alibi witnesses to the county attorney under circumstanceswherein thepetitioner was seeking tomove the discretion of the trial judge for "good cause shown" to permit the defense of alibi under section 95-1803(d), R.C.M. 1947. Petitioner had been charged in justice court on October 5, 1973,with sale of dangerousdrugs. An information in three countswas filed; and on October 25, 1973,petitioner plead "not guilty". He also made a motion to dismiss count I11 on grounds that it did not specify time and place as definitely as it should be done. Themotion was denied with the judge observing: "THECOURT: The name of the Informants is denied. If they can fix the date more accurately than the 20th day of September through the 4th day of October they will be required to do so. Or if there is more than one sale, all right;but it will not be dismissed because they could just file it all over again. Good cause shown here that statutory rights of his have not been prejudiced at this time. If they can fix itmore certainly for you they will do so. 

### I am denying your motion on the name. The informant is denied." Again, onApril 17, 1974,Judge Nelson heard further arguments. In that exchange, the transcript reveals that the state, on trial, will be relying on the defendant's own statements to some extent and on the statementor testimony of the person to whom the sale was made. At this stage, and with what little informationwe have it is difficult to understand what alibi defense is sought to be interposed. We are being asked to review the record. The record does not reveal any error at this time. Itmay well develop during trial that the state's casewill develop a fact situation to which the defense of alibi may be pertinent or material. At that time, for good cause shown, the defendantmay need some kind of relief but at this time we seeno need to review the trial court's action. Accordingly, the petition forwrit of review isdenied, without prejudice.

Honorable Thomas Dignan, District Judge, sat in place of Chief Justice James T. Harrison.
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT




NOW COME Central United Life Insurance Company (“Lessor”) and GraphOn Corporation (“Lessee”) pursuant to a lease agreement between the parties dated October 24, 2003 (the “Agreement”) and confirm the following:




1.  EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE AMENDMENT




This Fourth Amendment becomes effective September 15, 2009 and continues through the term of the Agreement.




2.  TERM




Lessor does hereby extend the Lease term for a three (3) year term commencing on September 15, 2009 and ending on September 14, 2012.  Lessee shall have the right to terminate the Lease at any time during the term by giving a six (6) month advance written notice to Lessor.




3.  BASE RENT




Lessee shall pay to Lessor annual rent in the amount of One Hundred Five Thousand Six Hundred and Fifty Nine Dollars ($105,659.00) the “Base Rent,” which base rent is calculated at Nineteen Dollars ($19.00) per square foot for Five Thousand Five Hundred Sixty One (5,561) square feet (except for any fractional months at the beginning and end of each term which shall be prorated).  Lessee shall make payment in equal monthly installments of Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Four Dollars and Ninety Two Cents ($8,804.92) in advance on the first day of each month.




4.  CONTINUATION OF AGREEMENT




In all other respects, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment by their officers hereunto duly authorized.




LESSOR:



Date:  09/17/09
CENTRAL UNITED LIFE INSURANCE CO.



BY:/s/ Douglas G. Noyes

Douglas G. Noyes

Its Duly Authorized RepresentativeLESSEE:



Date:  09/17/09
GRAPHON CORPORATION



BY:/s/ William Tidd

William Tidd

Its Director of Engineering







STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE




COUNTY OF MERRIMACK




The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17th day of September, 2009 by Douglas G. Noyes, Duly Authorized Representative of Central United Life Insurance Company.






BY:/s/ Susan Maples


Notary Public




STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE




COUNTY OF MERRIMACK




The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 17th day of September, 2009 by William Tidd of GraphOn Corporation.






BY:/s/ Susan Maples


Notary Public
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

RENO WOLFGANG,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-1797

JEFFREY J. DAWSY, AS SHERIFF 

OF CITRUS COUNTY,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed December 2, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Citrus County,

Patricia V. Thomas, Judge.

Reno Wolfgang, Punta Gorda, 

pro se.

R. Wesley Bradshaw, of Bradshaw 

& Mountjoy, P.A., Inverness, for 

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Reno Wolfgang appeals the dismissal of his cause of action for replevin seeking 

return of property seized during the course of a criminal investigation. We affirm. See

Pondella Hall For Hire, Inc. v. City of St. Cloud, 837 So. 2d 510, 511–12 (Fla. 5th DCA 

2003) (concluding trial court correctly dismissed replevin action because it lacked 

jurisdiction; cause of action must be brought in court with jurisdiction over the criminal 
2

proceedings (citing Eight Hundred Inc. v. State, 781 So. 2d 1187, 1190–91 (Fla. 5th DCA 

2001))).1

AFFIRMED. 

SAWAYA, COHEN and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

 1 We note that the dismissal is without prejudice to Wolfgang pursuing his claim in 

the appropriate court. See Pondella Hall For Hire, Inc., 837 So. 2d at 512.
ARMED SERVICES BOA RD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of-- ) 

) 

Ken Laster Company ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912BV-09-D-1013 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60845 

Kenneth E. Crump, Jr., Esq. 

William C. Searcy, Esq. 

Cody A. Reese, Esq. 

Barber & Bartz 

Tulsa, OK 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

Ronald J. Goodeyon, Esq. 

Jennifer A. Aranda, Esq. 

Engineer Trial Attorneys 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Tulsa 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

By letter dated 14 November 2016 to the Board appellant requested that it be 

allowed to "withdraw" its appeal. During a conference call between the parties and 

the Board on 21November2016 the parties' clarified appellant's request stating 

that both parties agreed to a dismissal without prejudice. As far as the status of the 

proceedings goes, the government delayed filing its answer based on the withdrawal 

request. Accordingly, ASBCA No. 60845 is dismissed without prejudice. 

Dated: 22 November 2016 

CRAIG . CLARKE 

Administ ative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60845, Appeal of Ken 

Laster Company, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
CUSIP 000000 00 0 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
is the owner of 
FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE CLASS A COMMON SHARES, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF 
RENT THE RUNWAY, INC. transferable on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by Attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This
certificate is not valid until countersigned COMMON and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Corporation has caused this
certificate to be signed by facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers. 
Dated: 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 
COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER TRUST&    COMPANY

New(Brooklyn,    York) 
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

BY 
AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 












 



 
 THE BOARD OF THIS CORPORATION HAS THE AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF
SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK OTHER THAN COMMON STOCK. THIS CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY SHAREHOLDER UPON WRITTEN REQUEST SENT TO ITS PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES, AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO CREATE AND
DETERMINE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS AND PREFERENCES OF CLASSES OR SERIES OF SHARES OF CAPITAL STOCK AS WELL AS THE DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES, LIMITATIONS AND RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS OR SERIES THEN OUTSTANDING OR AUTHORIZED TO BE
ISSUED. 
The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full
according to applicable laws or regulations: UTMA –    ____________ Custodian ____________ TEN COM – as tenants in common (Cust) (Minor) TEN ENT – as tenants by entireties under Uniform Transfers to Minors

JT TEN – as joint tenants with right of survivorship Act ________________________________ and not as tenants in common (State) Additional abbreviations may
also be used though not in the above list. 
For    value received _____ hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto 
PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
(PLEASE PRINT OR
TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE) 
Shares of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution 
in the premises.

Dated ________________ X 
X 
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY
CHANGE WHATEVER. 
SIGNATURE GUARANTEED 
ALL GUARANTEES MUST BE MADE BY A
FINANCIAL INSTITUTION (SUCH AS A BANK OR BROKER) WHICH IS A PARTICIPANT IN THE SECURITIES TRANSFER AGENTS MEDALLION PROGRAM (“STAMP”), THE NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE, INC. MEDALLION SIGNATURE PROGRAM (“MSP”), OR THE STOCK EXCHANGES
MEDALLION PROGRAM (“SEMP”) AND MUST NOT BE DATED. GUARANTEES BY A NOTARY PUBLIC ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.
REF ID:A70918 • , 

Fihi ur.tv.r ?:o. Storage & Preservation Dt:i.ta 26 May 48 

of Crypto-Equiprnent 

Type of Correspon<l~"'.ros,: Compl<.:ted Prolject Summary 

Subj•·ct: War Reserve Stocks 

Fron: A S-81 

TO: 

SynCJit.1sis. The problem; Authority needed for placing in War 

Reserve 2000 SIGABA's, 1250 SIGCUM,s, 500 SIGHUAD 1 s and 

500 SIBNIN1 s. 

Juthority requested and granted by ~cting Deputy Chief 

for th~se War Reserve allotments on 4 Dececrber 1947 •• 

Doci..rn•)nt filed und-:ir fl:o.. Project-Reports of Completion AS-81 

OSGJ S J•or!'I 110. 57 <kcv 1) 

2o September 1~46 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-02-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

3' .,.,_._, 1J
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certification of CEO/Treasurer

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southeastern Banking Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Cornelius P. Holland, III, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alyson G.
Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CORNELIUS P. HOLLAND, IIICornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO/s/ ALYSON G. BEASLEYAlyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer


Date: November 14, 2008
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report of Top Image Systems Ltd. (the Company) on
Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Arie Rand, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant
to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date: April 2, 2007

| |  | /s/ Arie Rand
Arie RandChief Financial Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 4, 2021

No. 04-21-00308-CV

IN RE Steve SWARTZMAN, Andy North, and Lucy Doan,

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

On July 30, 2021, Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes a

serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(b).

The respondent and the real party in interest may file a written response to the petition no

later than August 19, 2021. Any response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

52.4.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of August, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court

1

 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2020-CI-19151 styled Daniel Alarik v. Grunt Style, LLC, and Daniel 

Alarik, Individually and on behalf of Grunt Style, LLC v. Steve Swartzman, Andy North, and Lucy Doan, pending in 

the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Larry Noll presiding.
**Exhibit
      23**




**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**




To
      the
      Board of Directors


GVI
      Security Solutions Inc.




We
      hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
      previously filed Registration Statement of GVI Security Solutions Inc. on Form
      S-8 (File No. 333-143853) of our report, dated March 17, 2008, appearing in
      this
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of GVI Security Solutions Inc. for the years ended
      December 31, 2007 and 2006.





WEINBERG
      & COMPANY, P.A.





Los
      Angeles, California


March
      18,
      2008
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7262

DONTE LAQUAWN CAPERS,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

WARDEN LEROY CARTLEDGE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Florence. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (4:15-cv-03267-HMH)

Submitted: February 28, 2017 Decided: March 8, 2017

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donte Laquawn Capers, Appellant Pro Se. William Edgar Salter, 

III, Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Donte Laquawn Capers seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Capers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2015175EN.01000701.xml

| 29.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 May 2015

(2015/C 175/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0896 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4598 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71240 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2617 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0344 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4910 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,463 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1289 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4435 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8970 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4267 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3594 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4484 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5213 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4723 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 208,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2001 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7568 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5817 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 380,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9797 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 48,560 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 57,1277 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,909 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4373 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7079 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,5410 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0896

JPY

Japanese yen

135,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4598

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71240

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2617

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0344

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4910

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,463

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1289

RON

Romanian leu

4,4435

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8970

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4267

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3594

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4484

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5213

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4723

KRW

South Korean won

1 208,30

ZAR

South African rand

13,2001

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7568

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5817

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 380,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9797

PHP

Philippine peso

48,560

RUB

Russian rouble

57,1277

THB

Thai baht

36,909

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4373

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7079

INR

Indian rupee

69,5410

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of HanKersen International Corp.
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Yi Tong, Principal Accounting
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

July 10, 2006


By: /s/ Yi Tong
    ---------------------------------------------
    Yi Tong, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer