alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION**
 
 Pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. 1350
 (Section
        302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of IMPART Media Group,
        Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2006, as filed
        with
        the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        Joseph
        F. Martinez, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:April
                      20, 2007
                  By: 
                      /s/Joseph F. MartinezJoseph
                      F. MartinezChief
                      Executive Officer andChief
                      Financial Officer
 
 ______________________
 
 This
        certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
        Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
        provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
        to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6999

GREGORY DEAN MELVIN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

BRAD PERRITT, Superintendent, Lumberton Correctional; 

THEODORE BANKS, Programer/Rec Clerk Supervisor; STATE OF 

NORTH CAROLINA; DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, 

District Judge. (5:15-ct-03272-FL)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 28, 2016

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Dean Melvin, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Dean Melvin appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, we deny Melvin’s motion for appointment of counsel and 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Melvin v. 

Perritt, No. 5:15-ct-03272-FL (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000673

22-NOV-2016

08:47 AM
# C_2014366EN.01002201.xml

| 16.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 366/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 366/22

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITIONS

2014/C 366/06

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising the following open competitions:

| | EPSO/AD/288/14 — FINNISH-LANGUAGE (FI) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/288/14 — FINNISH-LANGUAGE (FI) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

| | EPSO/AD/289/14 — FRENCH-LANGUAGE (FR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/289/14 — FRENCH-LANGUAGE (FR) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

| | EPSO/AD/290/14 — PORTUGUESE-LANGUAGE (PT) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/290/14 — PORTUGUESE-LANGUAGE (PT) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

| | EPSO/AD/291/14 — ROMANIAN-LANGUAGE (RO) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/291/14 — ROMANIAN-LANGUAGE (RO) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

| | EPSO/AD/292/14 — SLOVAK-LANGUAGE (SK) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7) |
| --- | --- |

EPSO/AD/292/14 — SLOVAK-LANGUAGE (SK) LAWYER-LINGUISTS (AD 7)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 366 A of 16 October 2014.

C 366 A of 16 October 2014

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Executive Office of the President

###### Office of National Drug Control Policy

# AGENCY:

Office of National Drug Control Policy.

# ACTION:

Notice of HIDTA designation.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy designated 1 additional county as a High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) pursuant to                         *21 U.S.C. 1706.*                         The new county is New Castle County, Delaware as part of the Philadelphia/Camden HIDTA.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

 Questions regarding this notice should be directed to Michael K. Gottlieb, National HIDTA Program Director, Office of National Drug Control Policy, Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC 20503; (202) 395-4868.

Submitted: March 19, 2015.

Dated: January 5, 2015.

Daniel Rader,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-06771 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 a.m.]

 BILLING CODE 3280-F5-P
# C_2015223EN.01000201.xml

| 8.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 223/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 223/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7648 — eBook.de/Hugendubel/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 223/03)

On 22 June 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7648. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7648. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
CERTIFICATION
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 302

I, Rendal Williams, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of U.S. Canadian
Minerals, Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.


Date: November 15, 2004              By: /s/Rendal Williams
                                         -----------------------
                                         Rendal Williams
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2579 

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, with respect to bikeshare 

projects, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 2, 2021 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend titles 23 and 49, United States Code, with respect 

to bikeshare projects, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bikeshare Transit Act 

5 of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 Section 5302(1)(E) of title 49, United States Code, 

8 is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘and the installation’’ and in10 serting ‘‘, the installation’’; and 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2579 IS

1 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and bikeshare projects’’ after 

2 ‘‘public transportation vehicles’’. 

3 SEC. 3. CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY IM4 PROVEMENT PROGRAM ELIGIBLE PROJECTS. 

5 Section 149(b)(7) of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘shared micromobility (including 

7 bikesharing and shared scooter systems),’’ after 

8 ‘‘carsharing,’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS ON
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE




To the Board of Directors of
ORCKIT COMMUNICATIONS LTD.


Our audits of the consolidated financial statements of Orckit Communications
Ltd. referred to in our report dated January 16, 2003 also included an audit of
a Schedule - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2002 (the "Schedule"). In our opinion, the
Schedule presents fairly in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial
statements.


                                                   /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman

Tel-Aviv, Israel                                         Kesselman & Kesselman
    January 16, 2003                      Certified Public Accountants (Israel)
















Kesselman & Kesselman is a member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International
Limited, a company limited by guarantee registered in England and Wales.

                                      F-28
#### Sabine, by her guardian *ad litem,*vs. Fisher.

Amendment: Suit by Infant. (1) *Brought without guardian. Appointment may he made on trial.*

Exception. (2) *To whole charge nugatory, unless whole erroneous.*

New Trial. (8) *Properly refused in case.*

1. Plaintiff having commenced the action without any appointment of a guardian *ad litem,*there was no error in permitting her to amend so as to prosecute by such guardian, after the introduction of evidence in her behalf, which showed her to be a minor.

2. A general exception to a charge consisting of several propositions, raises no question for review in this court.

8. Where there was evidence sufficient to support the verdict, and no abuse of discretion in refusing a new trial, this court cannot disturb the order.

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for *Jefferson*County.

Action for breach of promise of marriage. The action was originally brought in tbe name of tbe plaintiff without guardian. On the trial it appeared in the plaintiff’s evidence that she was under the age of twenty-one years. Thereupon her counsel moved for leave to have a guardian *ad litem*appointed to prosecute the action for her, to which defendant’s counsel objected and moved the court to dismiss the action. The court allowed the motion of plaintiff and appointed a guardian *ad litem,*and the trial proceeded, resulting in a verdict for the plaintiff. The exceptions are stated in the opinion.

*V. W. Seely,*for appellant.

[No brief on file.]

*Qillet & Hammond,*for respondent,

argued that the appointment of a guardian *ad litem*was proper. *Hafern v. Davis,*10 Wis., 501; *Wheeler v. Smith,*18 id., 651. The question is one of regularity only. *Hof tailing v. Teal,*11 How. Pr., 188 ; *Hill v. Thacker,*3 How., 407. And not jurisdictional. *Rutter v. Ruchhofer,*9 Bósw., 68'8. Motion to dismiss should have been made before answer. *Parles v. Parks,*19 Abb., 161; *Fellows v. Hives’,*18 Wend., 563 ; *Schermerhorn v. Jenkins,*7 Johns., 373; *377
      *Treadwell v. Bruder,*3 E. D. Smith, 596. The exception to the charge is general.

RyaN, 0. J.

We see no ground for disturbing the judgment

There is no error in the leave given to the respondent to amend, so as to prosecute the suit by her next friend. Had she proceeded without leave, the judgment could not be reversed on that ground. *Hafern v. Davis,*10 Wis., 501; *Wheeler v. Smith,*18 id., 651.

The exception to the charge of the court below is general, and therefore can raise no question here. *Heath v. Heath,*31 Wis., 223. But we have looked into the charge, and see no misdirection or ground for complaint in it.

The're certainly was abundant evidence to support the verdict, and the facts were fairly submitted to the jury. There does not appear to have been an abuse of discretion in refusing a new trial, and we cannot disturb the order. *Jones v. Evans,*28 Wis., 168.

These appear to be the only exceptions in the record. The judgment of the court below must therefore be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
<PAGE>

                                                             EXHIBIT NUMBER 11.1


            INFORMATION MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                      COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER SHARE
                     (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                         Year ended December 31,
                                                             1997               1996
                                                         -----------        ------------
<S>                                                      <C>                <C>
Net income                                               $   11,895
                                                         ==========
Pro Forma Net Income                                                        $    2,545
                                                                            ==========

BASIC:
   Weighted average common shares outstanding                24,129             15,458
                                                         ==========         ==========
   Basic earnings per share                              $     0.49
                                                         ==========
   Pro forma basic earnings per share                                       $     0.16
                                                                            ==========

DILUTED:
   Common Shares                                             24,129             15,458
   Stock Option Plans
      Shares under option at year-end                        10,756             11,438
      Treasury Shares which could be purchased                 (418)              (525)
                                                         ----------         ----------

Weighted average common and
 common equivalent shares outstanding                        34,467             26,371
                                                         ==========         ==========

Diluted earnings per share                               $     0.35
                                                         ==========
Pro forma diluted earnings per share                                        $     0.10
                                                                            ==========
</TABLE>
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS C o M M o n s T o C K CUSIP 747324 10 1 This
CerTifies ThaT: SPECIMEN—NOT NEGOTIABLE is The owner of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK OF $0.001 PAR VALUE EACH OF Pyxis OncOlOgy, inc. transferable on the books of the Corporation
by the holder thereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate duly endorsed or assigned. This certificate and the shares represented hereby are subject to the laws of the State of Delaware, and to the Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaws of the Corporation, as now or hereafter amended. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent. WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized
officers. COUNTERSIGNED: BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS, INC. DATED: TRANSFER AGENT BY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE SPECIMEN NOT NEGOTIABLE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER     












 



 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were
written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM —as tenants in common    UNIF GIFT MIN ACT—.....Custodian TEN ENT—as tenants by the
entireties    (Cust)    (Minor) JT TEN —as joint tenants with right of    under Uniform Gifts to Minors    survivorship and not as
tenants    Act    in common    (State) Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For Value Received,    hereby sell, assign and transfer
unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE)     Shares of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby
irrevocably constitute and appoint    Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST
CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE Signature(s) Guaranteed OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. By    The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an
eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC Rule 17Ad-15. THE
CORPORATION WILL FURNISH TO ANY STOCKHOLDER, UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULL STATEMENT OF THE DESIGNATIONS, RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS AND SERIES AUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED, SO FAR AS THE SAME HAVE
BEEN DETERMINED, AND OF THE AUTHORITY, IF ANY, OF THE BOARD TO DIVIDE THE SHARES INTO CLASSES OR SERIES AND TO DETERMINE AND CHANGE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES. SUCH REQUEST MAY BE MADE TO THE SECRETARY OF
THE CORPORATION OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT NAMED ON THIS CERTIFICATE. COLUMBIA PRINTING SERVICES, LLC—www.stockinformation.com
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Roomlinx, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Michael S. Wasik, Chief Executive Officer and Edouard A. Garneau, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to my knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


Date: 03/30/11By:
/s/ Michael S. WasikMichael S. WasikChief Executive Officer




Date: 03/30/11By:
/s/ Edouard GarneauEdouard GarneauChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Roomlinx, Inc. and will be retained by Roomlinx, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.