15554 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 56 / Tuesday, March 24, 2015 / Notices 

1See Notice of Amended Final Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China; 

Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 

Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the 

People’s Republic of China; and Notice of 

Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 

(September 28, 2006) (CLPP Order). 

2The seven companies are: Kokuyo Riddhi Paper 

Products Private Limited (Kokuyo Riddhi), Marisa 

International (Marisa), Navneet Publications (India) 

Ltd./Navneet Education Limited (Navneet), Pioneer 

Stationery Private Limited (Pioneer), Riddhi 

Enterprises, SAB International (SAB), and Super 

Impex (AKA M/S Super Impex) (Super Impex). 

3The three companies include: Marisa, Pioneer, 

and Super Impex. Although Kokuyo Riddhi and 

Navneet filed timely withdrawal requests, 

petitioners’ withdrawal request did not include a 

withdrawal of Kokuyo Riddhi and Navneet, 

companies for which the petitioners requested a 

review. Therefore, Kokuyo Riddhi and Navneet 

remain subject to the instant review. 

4See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 79 FR 51958 

(September 2, 2014). 

5See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 

64565 (October 30, 2014). 

6See Petitioners’ letter dated September 30, 2014. 

7See, e.g., Brass Sheet and Strip from Germany: 

Notice of Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 73 FR 49170 (August 20, 

2008); Certain Lined Paper Products from India: 

Notice of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review and Extension of Time Limit 

for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review, 74 FR 21781 (May 11, 

2009). 

8 Kokuyo Riddhi and Navneet remain in the 

instant review because the petitioners’ withdrawal 

request did not include these two particular 

companies. 

paper products (CLPP) from India.1 The 

period of review (POR) is September 1, 

2013, through August 31, 2014, and the 

Department initiated the review with 

respect to seven companies.2 We are 

rescinding the review with respect to 

three companies for which review 

requests were timely withdrawn.3

DATES: Effective March 24, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Cindy Robinson or George McMahon, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office III, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th 

Street and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 

482–3797 or (202) 482–1167, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 2, 2014, the 

Department published a notice of 

opportunity to request an administrative 

review of the antidumping duty order 

on certain lined paper from India.4

Pursuant to requests from interested 

parties, the Department published in the 

Federal Register the notice of 

initiation 5 of this antidumping duty 

administrative review with respect 

seven companies for the period 

September 1, 2013, through August 31, 

2014. 

Rescission of Review, in Part 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the 

Secretary will rescind an administrative 

review, in whole or in part, if a party 

that requested a review withdraws the 

request within 90 days of the date of 

publication of the notice of initiation of 

the requested review. The instant 

review was initiated on October 30, 

2014. Accordingly, the deadline to 

timely file withdrawal of review 

requests was January 28, 2015. 

Petitioners submitted requests for 

review with respect to the following 

seven companies: Kokuyo Riddhi, 

Marisa, Navneet, Pioneer, Riddhi 

Enterprises, SAB, and Super Impex.6 On 

December 12, 2014, Navneet timely 

withdrew its request for administrative 

review. On January 28, 2015, the 

petitioners timely withdrew their 

request for administrative review of 

Marisa, Pioneer, and Super Impex. On 

January 28, 2015, Kokuyo Riddhi 

withdrew its request for administrative 

review. Thus, the aforementioned 

withdrawal requests are timely because 

they were filed within the 90-day 

deadline. 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(1) and consistent with our 

practice,7 we are rescinding this review 

with respect to Marisa, Pioneer, and 

Super Impex. The instant review will 

continue with respect to Kokuyo 

Riddhi, Navneet, Riddhi Enterprises, 

and SAB.8

Assessment 

The Department will instruct Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to assess 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries. For the companies for which 

this review is rescinded, i.e., Marisa, 

Pioneer, and Super Impex, antidumping 

duties shall be assessed at rates equal to 

the cash deposit of estimated 

antidumping duties required at the time 

of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, 

for consumption, during the period 

September 1, 2013, through August 31, 

2014, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). 

The Department intends to issue 

appropriate assessment instructions 

directly to CBP 15 days after publication 

of this notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

importers of their responsibility under 

19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this review 

period. Failure to comply with this 

requirement could result in the 

Secretary’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent increase in the amount of 

antidumping duties assessed. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as a reminder to 

parties subject to administrative 

protective orders (APOs) of their 

responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under an APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials or conversion to judicial 

protective order is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and terms of an APO is a violation 

which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

This notice is issued and published in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 

777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(4). 

Dated: March 18, 2015. 

Gary Taverman, 

Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06752 Filed 3–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

RIN 0648–XD816 

Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of 

Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish 

Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; 

Exempted Fishing Permit 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of receipt of an 

application for an exempted fishing 

permit; request for comments. 

SUMMARY: NMFS announces the receipt 

of an application for an exempted 

fishing permit (EFP) from the 

Mississippi Department of Marine 

Resources (MS DMR). If granted, the 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 56 / Tuesday, March 24, 2015 / Notices 15555 

1See Magnesium Metal From the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013– 

2014, 79 FR 69834 (November 24, 2014) 

(‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 

EFP would authorize the applicant to 

collect red drum in Federal waters using 

state of MS-licensed charter and 

headboat vessels (for-hire vessels). The 

purpose of this study is to collect 

population data specific to the genetics, 

age and growth, reproduction, and food 

habits of adult red drum in Federal 

waters where harvest is currently 

prohibited. The data would then be 

used to support future stock assessment 

information for red drum. 

DATES: Comments must be received no 

later than April 23, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

on the application by any of the 

following methods: 

• Email: 

0648.XD816.Red.Drum.EFP@noaa.gov. 

Include in the subject line of the email 

comment the following document 

identifier: ‘‘MS Red Drum_EFP’’. 

• Mail: Steve Branstetter, Southeast 

Regional Office, NMFS, 263 13th 

Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701. 

The application and related 

documents are available for review 

upon written request to any of the above 

addresses. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Steve Branstetter, 727–824–5305; email: 

Steve.Branstetter@noaa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EFP is 

requested under the authority of the 

Magnuson-Stevens Fishery 

Conservation and Management Act (16 

U.S.C. 1801 et seq.), and regulations at 

50 CFR 600.745(b) concerning exempted 

fishing. 

The harvest and possession of red 

drum in the Federal waters of the Gulf 

of Mexico (Gulf) has been prohibited 

since 1988 (53 FR 24662, June 29, 1988). 

The harvest and possession prohibition 

was implemented to protect the Gulf red 

drum stock from overfishing. The Gulf 

of Mexico Fishery Management Council 

(Council) is currently discussing 

whether to modify or remove this 

harvest and possession prohibition, but 

data regarding the adult red drum in 

Gulf Federal waters is limited. The 

existing population data is not 

representative of the Gulf red drum 

population as a whole as it mainly 

consists of younger and smaller red 

drum samples obtained from state 

waters where harvest is permitted. 

The proposed collection for scientific 

research involves activities that would 

be prohibited by regulations at 50 CFR 

part 622, as they pertain to red drum 

managed by the Council. Specifically, 

the EFP requests exemption from 

Federal regulations at § 622.92 

(Prohibited species) that prohibit the 

harvest and possession of red drum in 

Gulf Federal waters. 

The applicant requests authorization 

through the EFP to allow state of MSlicensed for-hire vessels to have a 

recreational bag and possession limit of 

one red drum per person per trip from 

Federal waters. There would be no size 

limits applicable for the red drum 

collected through this EFP. 

Additionally, the red drum bag and 

possession limits for captain and crew 

of any for-hire vessel participating in 

this study would be zero. 

Beginning in the fall of 2015, the 

applicant requests to collect a maximum 

of 30,000 lb (13,608 kg) of red drum 

during a 2-year period. The 30,000 lb 

(13,608 kg) is equivalent to 

approximately 2,000 red drum or about 

1,000 red drum per each year of the 

study. According to MS DMR, as many 

as 70 for-hire vessels would be a part of 

the study. For any vessel trip that plans 

to harvest red drum, the vessel would be 

required to hail-in and hail-out with a 

representative of MS DMR using an 

existing MS DMR electronic reporting 

format. A representative of MS DMR 

would then meet the vessel that has red 

drum onboard harvested from Federal 

waters to collect sample information. 

The applicant would monitor the 

amount of red drum collected to ensure 

that the 30,000 lb (13,608 kg) sample 

limit is not exceeded. After biological 

sampling by MS DMR is completed for 

each red drum landed by participating 

for-hire vessels, recreational fishers 

from the for-hire vessel would be 

allowed to retain the red drum as 

recreational harvest. All red drum 

collected through this study would be 

harvested during regular for-hire trips 

using hook-and-line gear in Gulf Federal 

waters. A MS-licensed for-hire vessel 

would not be permitted to fish for or 

possess either Gulf reef fish species or 

coastal migratory pelagic species unless 

that vessel also had a Federal charter 

vessel/headboat permit for the 

applicable species. It is not anticipated 

that the study will increase any overall 

fishing effort in the Gulf. 

Samples to be collected by the 

applicant include biological material for 

red drum population genetics, age and 

growth, reproduction, and food habits 

analyses of adult red drum in Federal 

waters. Some specific information to be 

collected include using molecular 

techniques to identify possible metapopulations and genetic structure, 

stomach content analysis, tissue 

analysis, several length measurements, 

otolith sampling, and histology analysis. 

The research data are intended to 

provide better life history information to 

assist with any future red drum stock 

assessments and to assist the Council 

with future management decisions. 

NMFS finds this application warrants 

further consideration. Possible 

conditions the agency may impose on 

this permit, if it is indeed granted, 

include but are not limited to, a 

prohibition of conducting research 

within marine protected areas, marine 

sanctuaries, or special management 

zones, without additional authorization. 

A report on the research would be due 

at the end of the collection period, to be 

submitted to NMFS and reviewed by the 

Council. 

A final decision on issuance of the 

EFP will depend on NMFS’ review of 

public comments received on the 

application, consultations with 

appropriate fishery management 

agencies of the affected states, the 

Council, and the U.S. Coast Guard, as 

well as a determination that it is 

consistent with all applicable laws. 

Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. 

Dated: March 18, 2015. 

Emily H. Menashes, 

Acting Director, Office of Sustainable 

Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06661 Filed 3–23–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–896] 

Magnesium Metal From the People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 24, 2015. 

SUMMARY: On November 24, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘the 

Department’’) published in the Federal 

Register the preliminary results of the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on magnesium 

metal from the People’s Republic of 

China (‘‘PRC’’) covering the period April 

1, 2013 through March 31, 2014.1 This 

review covers two PRC producer/ 

exporters, Tianjin Magnesium 

International, Co., Ltd. (‘‘TMI’’) and 

Tianjin Magnesium Metal, Co., Ltd. 

(‘‘TMM’’). The Department gave 

interested parties an opportunity to 

comment on the Preliminary Results, 

but we received no comments. Hence, 

these final results are unchanged from 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES