alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
          
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               3MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                              21,389
<SECURITIES>                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                      141,501
<ALLOWANCES>                             0
<INVENTORY>                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   162,890
<PP&E>                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     162,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               21,107
<BONDS>                                  0
<COMMON>                             1,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                    0
<PREFERRED>                              0
<OTHER-SE>                         140,783
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       162,890
<SALES>                              3,038
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     3,038
<CGS>                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       570
<LOSS-PROVISION>                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      2,468
<INCOME-TAX>                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  2,468
<DISCONTINUED>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                          0
<CHANGES>                                0
<NET-INCOME>                         2,468
<EPS-PRIMARY>                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                            0

        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-2009

WILLIAM SCOTT DAVIS, JR., on behalf of and as next friend 

of J.F.D., a minor,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

J.F.D., a minor,

Plaintiff,

v.

MELANIE A. SHEKITA, Individually and as a Wake County NC 

Assistant District Attorney for the State of North Carolina; 

MICHELLE SAVAGE, individually and as a Police Detective for 

the Cary North Carolina Police Department; DANIELLE DOYLE, 

individually and as a Wake County North Carolina Department 

of Health and Human Services Child Protective Services 

Social Worker; ERIC CRAIG CHASSE, individually and as a Wake 

County North Carolina Family Court Judge; MIKE EASLEY, 

individually and as Governor of the State of North Carolina; 

BEVERLY PERDUE, individually and as Governor of the State of 

North Carolina,

Defendants - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00504-H)

Submitted: November 22, 2016 Decided: November 29, 2016
2

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

William Scott Davis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

William Scott Davis, Jr., seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying six motions in a closed 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) action. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction 

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on 

April 5, 2016. The notice of appeal was filed on August 30, 

2016.* Because Davis failed to file a timely notice of appeal or 

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We deny all pending motions, including 

Davis’ motions to consolidate, to appoint counsel, and to remand 

the case. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

 * For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date 

appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could 

have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to 

the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 

(1988).
4

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
# C_2015161EN.01000401.xml

| 14.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 May 2015

(2015/C 161/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1221 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,31 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4630 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71740 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3267 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0410 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3570 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,450 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,95 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0872 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4602 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9744 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3945 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3436 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6987 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5061 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4916 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 229,03 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4450 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9622 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5591 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 723,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0360 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,120 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 55,6080 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,661 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3684 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1482 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,8256 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1221

JPY

Japanese yen

134,31

DKK

Danish krone

7,4630

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71740

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3267

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0410

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3570

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,450

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,95

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0872

RON

Romanian leu

4,4602

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9744

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3945

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3436

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6987

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5061

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4916

KRW

South Korean won

1 229,03

ZAR

South African rand

13,4450

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9622

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5591

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 723,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0360

PHP

Philippine peso

50,120

RUB

Russian rouble

55,6080

THB

Thai baht

37,661

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3684

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1482

INR

Indian rupee

71,8256

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32.2

 

SOHU.COM INC. 

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Derek Palaschuk, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

 

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of September 30, 2003 and results of operations of the Company for the three and ninemonths ended September 30, 2003. 

 

/s/    Derek Palaschuk

 

Derek Palaschuk, Senior Vice 

President and Chief Financial Officer 

 

November 14, 2003
--- -c 

REF ID:A39923 

~~r 

FOLDER: Legisla tion-Espiori\e 

1. Bill S. 1019 - Espionage Act-Modification of, by 

W. F. Friedman. ObJections raised against 1019-fear 

of suppression of freedom of Press. Present bill 

takes care only of willful leakages. 

2. Letter from Wenger, enclosing copy of opinion of 

Attorney-General with regard to withholding from 

Congressional Committees information concerning intelligence activities. 

3. A Bill relating to internal security of u.s.--Punish acts 

of intereference with foreign relations, neutrality, 

etc., to punish espionage, etc. 

4. Order--Supreme Court of U s. Provisions added to 

Admiralty Rule 46 re coded text 

5. Release of information concerning cryptanalytic activities 

6. Bill S-805 -- to insure military security of U.S. by preventing disclosure of information secured through official sources. 

7. Congressional Record-Senate -- Prevention of.. disclosure 

of information. 

8. Senate Report--Safeguarding military information. 

9. H.R. 2711 -- to insure military security of the U S. by preventing disclosures of information secured through official sou:t>ces. 

10. Memo to Mr. Friedman re policy with regard to termination 

of employment of cryptographic personnel. Taking the 

oath of secrecy. 

11. Preliminary inquiry as to whether there exists sufficient 

protection against serious breaches 9f security. 

12. Proposed draft of legislation by Mr Friedman for betterment of security control of employees charged with 

cryptographic and cryptanalytic activities. 

13. Conference for proposed legislation against unauthorized 

dissemination of communication intelligence. 

.. 

1 

t 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A39923 

FOLDER. Legislation-Espions.le - continued 

14. Letter Friedman to Corderman re reminding personnel of 

AHS about secrecy oath. 

15. Bill R.R. 6632 - Penalize divulging or contents of confidential government documents. 

16. Comments on bill HR. 4220 -- attempt to protect government documents against compromise or disclosure.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2675 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2675

       To amend the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to increase 
    appropriations to Restaurant Revitalization Fund, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 7, 2021

 Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Murkowski, Ms. 
 Cantwell, Ms. Ernst, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Cassidy, Ms. Stabenow, and Mrs. 
  Hyde-Smith) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To amend the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 to increase 
    appropriations to Restaurant Revitalization Fund, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Continuing Emergency Support for 
Restaurants Act''.

SEC. 2. APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE RESTAURANT REVITALIZATION FUND.

    (a) In General.--Section 5003(b)(2) of the American Rescue Plan Act 
of 2021 (15 U.S.C. 9009c(b)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A)--
                    (A) by striking ``$28,600,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$76,600,000,000''; and
                    (B) by inserting ``, of which $280,000,000 shall be 
                for administrative expenses to carry out this section 
                and $20,000,000 shall be for the Inspector General of 
                the Small Business Administration for audits of grants 
                under this section to investigate fraud and to identify 
                ineligible recipients, and for other necessary expenses 
                of the Office of the Inspector General'' before the 
                period at the end; and
            (2) in subparagraph (B)(i)(II), by striking 
        ``$23,600,000,000'' and inserting ``$71,300,000,000''.
    (b) Emergency Designation.--
            (1) In general.--The amounts provided under the amendments 
        made by subsection (a) are designated as an emergency 
        requirement pursuant to section 4(g) of the Statutory Pay-As-
        You-Go Act of 2010 (2 U.S.C. 933(g)).
            (2) Designation in senate.--In the Senate, the amendments 
        made by subsection (a) are designated as an emergency 
        requirement pursuant to section 4112(a) of H. Con. Res. 71 
        (115th Congress), the concurrent resolution on the budget for 
        fiscal year 2018.
                                 <all>
```
REF ID:A484952 

_y #le:r. y .7 ~ 

/~d'2~~·1 ;C/OJ~# ~7tJ67/ l>rr; ;l2.3o'f ~ 

~~ .. f~~. 

/f ~/# tJ 3 r ~ />let ti. 3 I I .2 2 -:C . 

~~ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-14-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 
.! 

I 

!lGA-70 'l 

·b 

. NBA~~ 2 

IB--0612 

OCS i 

Pfe V"/Dm ~ 

.. ,,, r"l .... ,. ., .... .., !l.100 0 

AG 9-~2 

F/P 13-15 

AGO # ¢7¢t;9 

PARAPHASE NOT REQUIRED 

92 16-19 

S/ASST 2¢ 

l61wum 1954 

OTG 1623¢l~z 

WL 15¢ 

AU m rrnP-1' .li'au .• ui:m:; mcu lEAlms t.Ki\Wl xmmta> n aa xw cp me ~•ir 

sov1m :u:rnJ1WMi2 i:ti' CI?HCR am~ ro.n ~aJER ccm'i:iBE!ICG usrn:t.E» ro lJRl'l1ISU 

mm.m vm ~:r ~ m i~ 1ro re m:.to nn11.'lml mr.em&OGA.'1'.tW CEift'£Et GQIWrl. 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

t 

1 OP SECRET CONTJ~_OL_ it_ 5-Jt. 0 0'1~ 11 ·- COPY ~ n___OF .,·t ~-C-·~ 

PAGE---;i--OF - 1 PAGES 

1 l 

614 Day..ityCbief', ~ct~ 

TOP SECRET
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David L. Osborn, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Hudson's Grill International, Inc.;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.	I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as
of the end of the periods presented in this report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)	presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.	The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and
have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.

|Date:	May 12, 2005 | /s/David L. Osborn

[Signature]

President
|------------------ | ------------------------------------------

f\sec\o01.050512
# C_2015440EN.01000101.xml

| 30.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 440/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 440/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2012-2013 SESSION

Sittings of 14 to 17 January 2013

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 92 E, 28.3.2013.

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 92 E, 28.3.2013.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
#### Jacob L. Rosenfeld, Plaintiff, *v.*Harry Jeffra and Another,. Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 20, 1937.

*663
      *Hyman W. Okun,*for the plaintiff.

*Sol Strauss,*for the defendants.

McLaughlin (Charles B.), J.

The defendants move to dismiss the complaint under the provisions of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The action is in equity, and the sole prayer for relief is for an injunction. It is based upon a contract concerning the management and the boxing exhibitions of the defendant Jeffra, a professional boxer, entered into by plaintiff and the defendant Harry Blaustein with the defendant Harry Jeffra in the city of Baltimore, Md., on March 3, 1936. By the terms of the contract (1[ 8) the defendant Blaustein had the sole and exclusive right to make all the matches for the defendant Jeffra. The plaintiff seeks to enjoin by this action the appearance of the defendant Jeffra in any boxing exhibitions in this State or elsewhere.

Before such a contract will be enforced in this State, it must appear by the allegations of the complaint that one who is a manager of a boxer is licensed under the rules and regulations of the New York State Athletic Commission. There is no allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff is so licensed.

A contract made by an unlicensed manager is void. *(Griffith*v. *Wells,*3 Den. 226; 37 C. J. § 138, p. 260.) Moreover, the rules and regulations adopted by the State Athletic Commission (§ 32) provide that a contract with a fighter becomes null and void if the manager be not duly licensed.

Under the circumstances our courts will not enforce the provisions of this contract so as to make it operative in this State. *(Dewitt*v. *Brisbane,*16 N. Y. 508, 514.)

Motion is granted with leave to amend if plaintiff can show that he is licensed as aforesaid.

Settle order.
# C_2015007EN.01000101.xml

| 12.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 007/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 462, 22.12.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 448, 15.12.2014

OJ C 439, 8.12.2014

OJ C 431, 1.12.2014

OJ C 421, 24.11.2014

OJ C 409, 17.11.2014

OJ C 395, 10.11.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

LARRY BRICKHOUSE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 545 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 20-50083

Summary Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Angel Alvarez Alvarado, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:18-CR-52-1

Before Wiener, Southwick, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Angel Alvarez Alvarado pleaded guilty, without the benefit of a plea 

agreement, to possession of a firearm after felony conviction and was 

sentenced to 51 months of imprisonment. He challenges the district court’s 

application of a sentencing enhancement, under U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(6)(B), 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 12, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 20-50083 Document: 00515598173 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/12/2020
No. 20-50083

2

based on his possession of a firearm in connection with another felony 

offense. 

Here, the unrebutted presentence report stated that in addition to the 

firearm, Alvarado possessed 51 grams of cocaine, individually packaged for 

distribution, and that he admitted to selling cocaine for monetary 

compensation. The district court did not clearly err by applying the 

§ 2K2.1(b)(6)(B) enhancement based on its plausible determination that 

Alvarado was engaged in drug trafficking. See § 2K2.1, comment. 

(n.14(B)(ii)); United States v. Alcantar, 733 F.3d 143, 146-48 (5th Cir. 2013). 

Alvarado’s unsupported speculation that he might have intended to consume 

rather than distribute all of the cocaine he possessed is unpersuasive and 

insufficient to demonstrate clear error. See Alcantar, 733 F.3d at 146.

AFFIRMED.

Case: 20-50083 Document: 00515598173 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/12/2020
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             185
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      136
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   322
<PP&E>                                              50
<DEPRECIATION>                                      46
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,590
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,278)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,405
<SALES>                                            461
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   461
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (223)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.024)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.024)
        

</TABLE>