alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from Form 10Q at
November  30,  1998  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                        FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                             NOV-30-1998
<CASH>                                                       316,000
<SECURITIES>                                               1,997,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 75,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              18,000
<PP&E>                                                        25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (23,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                             2,408,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      1,666,000
<BONDS>                                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         25,000
<PREFERRED>                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                                   717,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                               2,408,000 
<SALES>                                                            0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              32,000 
<CGS>                                                              0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                      0 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             227,000 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                   0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            16,000 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (211,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                       0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (211,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                     0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                    0 
<CHANGES>                                                          0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                (211,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                  (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  (0.09)
                                                   

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8
(No. 333-42790), Form S-3 (No.333-55988) and Form S-4 (No. 333-67310) of Corel
Corporation of our report dated January 26, 2001, except for Note 17, which is as of September
5, 2001 relating to the financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders,
which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.  We also consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report dated January 26, 2001 relating to the financial statement
schedules, which appears in this Form 10-K/A.

/s/ *PricewaterhouseCoopers* LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Ottawa, Canada

Chartered Accountants September 5, 2001
December 12, 2014

Mr. Terrell Scott 500 South Highland Ave. Midwest City, OK 73110

Dear Mr. Scott :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your reque st for an exemption from § § 65.75(b) and 65.79

, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regu lations (14 CFR). It explains why

we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can No t Process Your Request

We entered your December 5 , 2014 , exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA

20 14

- 1013 ), but we are u nable to process your request any further. The information you sent

does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). Additionally, while your petition requests rel ief from § § 65.75(b) and 65.79 requirements, relief described in your petit ion i s actually required from 14 CFR § 65.71(a).

F or us to consider the request any further, you must send us the following information

indicated below :

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would no t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would p rovide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

 If applicable, t he specific reasons why you need to exercise the pri vileges of your exemption outside the United States.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open dur ing this period

. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at

least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

You may submit the additional information to the FAA through the Internet at http://www.r egulations.gov, the Federal Do cket Management System Web site using the public docket number assigned to your petition. Paper submission should be sent to this

address: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, West Building Ground Floor,

Roo m W12

- 140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. Also, f or additional instructions, you may visit http://www.faa.gov/regulations

.

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additio nal t ime, you may e

- mail the analyst working your petition, Mr. Alphonso Pendergrass @ alphonso.pe ndergrass@faa.gov

, or call (202) 267

- 4713

.

Sincerely,

/s/

James M. Crotty Manager, Aircraft and Air port Rules Division

Enclosure § 11.81
1 

 – 

HPLC analysis

August 21, 2013

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
2 

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Column: 150 mm x 4.6 mm 5μm xdb-c18 column 

Mobile phase: THF/water gradient

Flow Rate: 1 ml/min

Detection: UV @ 230nm 

Temperature: 25°C 

Injection volume: 0.2μL

QUANTITATION AND IDENTIFICATION OF IMPURITIES

A Single-point calibration was used for the 4 main components of . 

 and were supplied from the Sponsor and used without 

further purification. Response factors were generated for these substances and these factors were 

used to quantify the wt% component in . 

1.

Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of (19.3mg/10ml THF; 0.2μL injection) 

[ ]

[ ]

[ ] [ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
3 

2.

Figure 2. HPLC chromatogram of (5.9mg/10ml THF; 0.2μL injection)

3.

Figure 3. HPLC chromatogram (4.6mg/10ml THF; 0.2μL injection) 

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
4 

Figure 1. HPLC chromatogram of 

Figure 5. HPLC chromatogram of (29.9 mg/10ml, 0.2μL injection) 

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]

[ ]
5 

[ ]
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 168 (Tuesday, August 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53993-53994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-22142]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7572]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``New Photography 2011: Zhang Dali, Moyra Davey, George 
Georgiou, Deana Lawson, Doug Rickard, Viviane Sassen''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``New Photography 2011: Zhang Dali, Moyra 
Davey, George Georgiou, Deana Lawson, Doug Rickard, Viviane Sassen,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to a 
loan agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine 
that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, New York, from on or about September 27, 2011, 
until on or about January 16, 2012, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Kevin M. Gleeson, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6473). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

[[Page 53994]]

    Dated: August 24, 2011.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2011-22142 Filed 8-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
(logo)CIMARRON MORTGAGE COMPANY    3780 1-55 North
                                   Jackson, MS 39211

                                   P. 0. Box 12830                 (601)987-8000
                                   Jackson, MS 39236-2830     FAX: (601)987-8002


Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, MD 21044-3562
Attention: Tracey Waldman


RE: Officer's Certificate

Dear Master Servicer:

The undersigned Officer certifies the following for the 1996 fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled all of its
duties,  responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
year,  or if there has been a default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a description of each default
or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported to Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have  confirmed  that the Servicer is currently an approved  FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide
are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged Property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or  encumbrance  on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
required per section 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively,
have been prepared and filed.

Certified By:

/s/Paul J. Salvo
Officer

President
Title

3/28/97
Date






                   Member of the Mortgage Bankers Association
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.1

# CERTIFICATION

# PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Oded Bashan, as Chief Executive Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)       
          the accompanying Form 20-F report for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
          with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
          Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |                                       
|---------------------- | --------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|Dated:  March 31, 2008 | By: /s/ Oded Bashan                   
|                       | Oded Bashan                           
|                       | Chief Executive Officer of the Company



---

---
# C_2015186EN.01000101.xml

| 5.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7561 — PRE/AXIS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 186/01)

On 22 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7561. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7561. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit
4.1


 


AMENDMENT
NO. 3 TO THE GAUCHO GROUP HOLDINGS, INC.


(FORMERLY
ALGODON WINES & LUXURY DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.)


2018
AWLD EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 


Section
4(a) of the Plan, as previously amended, is hereby further amended as follows:


 


	Section
    4.	Shares
    Available for Awards


 


	(a)	Shares
    Available. Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan, the aggregate number of Shares that may be issued under
    the Plan, excluding shares issued under the Pre-Existing Plans, shall be 1,773,730 Shares (15% of the Common Stock outstanding on
    a fully-diluted basis as of the date of stockholder approval of August 26, 2021), plus an automatic annual increase to be added on
    January 1 of each year equal to 2.5% of the total number of Shares outstanding on such date (including for this purpose any Shares
    issuable upon conversion of any outstanding capital stock of the Company).
	 	 
	(i)	Any
    Shares subject to an Award issued under this Plan or the Pre-Existing Plans that are canceled, forfeited or expire prior to exercise
    or realization, either in full or in part, shall be added to the total number of Shares available for an Award to be made under the
    Plan.
	 	 
	(ii)	Shares
    to be issued under the Plan must be authorized but unissued Shares.
	 	 
	(iii)	Notwithstanding
    the foregoing, (A) the number of Shares available for granting Incentive Stock Options under the Plan shall not exceed the aggregate
    number of Shares that may be issued under the Plan not taking into account any automatic increase in the share reserve, subject to
    adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan and subject to the provisions of Section 422 or 424 of the Code or any successor
    provision and (B) the number of Shares available for granting Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units shall not exceed 500,000,
    subject to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) of the Plan. Shares tendered by Participants as full or partial payment to the
    Company upon exercise of an Award, and Shares withheld by or otherwise remitted to the Company to satisfy a Participant’s tax
    withholding obligations with respect to an Award, shall not then become available for issuance under the Plan. Any Shares withheld
    or otherwise remitted to the Company to satisfy tax withholding obligations, to pay the exercise price of an Award, or Shares of
    Common Stock subject to a broker-assisted cashless exercise of an Award shall reduce the number of Shares available for issuance
    under the Plan.
	 	 
	(iv)	The
    maximum number of Shares subject to an Award granted during a Fiscal Year to any Director (exclusive of Shares subject to an Award
    issued to any Director in his or her capacity as an Employee of the Company), together with any cash fees paid to such Director during
    the Fiscal Year shall not exceed a total value of $100,000 (calculating the value of any Awards based on the grant date fair value
    for financial reporting purposes).
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. 

WR-91,936-03, -04, -05, -06

IN RE THE STATE OF TEXAS EX REL. KIM OGG, Relator

v.

228TH DISTRICT COURT

ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS

IN THE 228TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam. Keller, P.J., filed a dissenting opinion joined by Yeary, J.; Hervey, J., filed

a concurring opinion joined by Newell and Walker, J.J.; Newell, J., filed a concurring opinion

joined by Hervey and Walker, J.J.

O R D E R

The Harris County District Attorney, in these mandamus applications, asks this Court to

order the trial court to rescind its orders compelling the State to make discovery disclosures to the

Real Parties in Interest. Before its filing in this Court, the State sought mandamus relief in the First
2

Court of Appeals, as it is required to do, and the First Court denied relief. Padilla v. McDaniel, 122 1

S.W.3d 805 (Tex.Crim.App. 2003). This Court issued stays of the trial court’s orders pending

disposition of the mandamus applications.

We deny mandamus relief. See In re State ex rel. Weeks, 391 S.W.3d 117 (Tex. Crim.

App. 2013); In re McCann, 422 S.W.3d 701 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013). The stays of the trial

court’s orders are lifted.

Filed: September 15, 2021

Do not publish

 The underlying cases are: Texas v. Armstrong, Appeal Nos. 01-20-00644-CR (trial no. 1

1680891), 01-20-00645-CR (trial no. 1684289), and 01-20-00646-CR (trial no. 1684291) (the -

05 mandamus); Texas v. Reyna, Appeal Nos. 01-20-00647-CR (trial no. 1680886), 01-20-00648-

CR (trial no. 1680887), 01-20-00649-CR (trial no. 1680888), and 01-20-00650-CR (trial no.

1680897) (the -06 mandamus); Texas v. Gonzales, Appeal No. 01-20-00609-CR (trial no.

1680894) (the -03 mandamus); and Texas v. Wood, Appeal Nos. 01-20-00612-CR (trial no.

1680890) and 01-20-00617-CR (trial no. 1680898) (the -04 mandamus).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Air T, Inc.
(the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results
of operations of the Company for such period.





Date:  February 12, 2004                /s/ John J. Gioffre
					John J. Gioffre, Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6819

LARRY DEAN HOOPER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; HAROLD CLARK; CARL 

MANIS,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga, 

District Judge. (1:14-cv-01460-AJT-IDD)

Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Dean Hooper, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Larry Dean Hooper seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Hooper has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny his motion to proceed as 

unnecessary, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 
3

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
... .. REF ID :A36347 • 

1. There , s no a.pare t obJ eat1on to the dorngr~l•ng of t11~ rr~t3r/~l 

or its commercial e....~loitation 

2 The m~st important vroblem involved in downgradl~g cry~togr~hic 

iaformat on LS the ozotection or systeTs in ~se or cons de1ed fJr u3e 

by the un.ted States. Arter this, release of any cry~to5raph, should, 

Lt seems, be conn t oned by the answers to the quest~ons 

of "V'h ch is unlmown"> 

b. Would vroblemi:. of -ntercept be enhanced by the use o.a. the 

cry}Jtogrs.ph? 

3. To the -~medi~te problem, tne ans\ers aie as fvllows: 

a. The Vernam rule lS a well-im•m crys.tcgr::-ah c princil'le Although 

i ~s generally t~cught of as d rec~ly relatec tc telety1 e, t~ s~pl cotLon 

to f'\cs m_le s a log cal e.A.tensic1.1.. 

b. Interce~t of material enciphered by th s aev.ce ~reseats no greater 

Froblems than those nvolved in the .interce~t of cle:ll' fscs1m.le Enc-~hered 

tr8.l1sm::.ss o"ls could, a-. a matter oi f ct, be Lecoid d by st ndard facsJIIU.le 

roved for Release b NSA on 07-29-2014