alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

597 

KA 10-02122 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHAUN K. ELLIOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

LEONARD, CURLEY & WALSH, PLLC, ROME (MICHAEL W. ARTHUR OF COUNSEL),

FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LEANNE K. MOSER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, LOWVILLE, D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO,

ESQS., SYRACUSE (JOHN A. CIRANDO OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Lewis County Court (Charles C.

Merrell, J.), rendered July 9, 2010. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled

substance in the third degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third

degree (Penal Law § 220.39 [1]), defendant contends that County Court

erred in accepting his Alford plea because the record lacked the

requisite “strong evidence of actual guilt” to support his plea. That

contention survives his waiver of the right to appeal to the extent

that it implicates the voluntariness of the plea (see People v Dash,

74 AD3d 1859, 1860, lv denied 15 NY3d 892; People v Dille, 21 AD3d

1298, 1298, lv denied 5 NY3d 882). By failing to move to withdraw the

plea or vacate the judgment of conviction on the ground that the

record lacked the requisite “strong evidence of actual guilt,”

however, defendant failed to preserve his contention for our review

(see Dille, 21 AD3d at 1298; People v Ebert, 15 AD3d 781, 782), and

this case does not fall within the narrow exception to the

preservation requirement (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666; Dille,

21 AD3d at 1298). In any event, we conclude that “the record

establishes that defendant’s Alford plea was the product of a

voluntary and rational choice, and the record . . . contains strong

evidence of actual guilt” (Dash, 74 AD3d at 1860 [internal quotation

marks omitted]). 

Entered: June 7, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED SEPTEMBER 17, 2014

NO. 03-13-00395-CV

Employees Retirement System of Texas, Appellant

v.

M. P., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 200TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED --

OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on May 7, 2013. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

trial court’s judgment but that there was error requiring correction. Therefore, the court modifies 

the trial court’s judgment by deleting the portion of the judgment limiting the scope of remand to 

the record previously established. The Court affirms the judgment as modified. The appellant 

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

LARAY J. BENTON, et al.

,

Plaintiff s ,

v. Civil Action No. 1 5

- 843 (JEB)

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,

et al.

,

Defendants.

ORDER

As set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, the Court ORDERS that:

1. The Bank Defendants’ [2] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART;

2. The Ocwen Defendants’ [4] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART;

3. Seterus’s [17] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART;

4. Wil mington’s [21] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED IN PART;

5. Plaintiffs’ [5] Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE; and

6. The case is TRANSFERRED to the District of Maryland.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

**/s/ James E. Boasberg**

JAMES E. BOASBERG

United States District Judge

Date: February 9, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         589,532
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    666,223
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,554,791
<PP&E>                                      17,432,137
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,694,564
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,090,966
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,286,434
<BONDS>                                      3,859,803
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       396,283
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,548,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,090,966
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,500,172
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,849,879
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             225,001
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (563,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (563,755)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (563,755)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015204EN.01001701.xml

| 20.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 204/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 204/17

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 June 2015

(2015/C 204/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1299 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,19 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4611 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71340 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2177 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0449 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8255 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,211 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,85 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1729 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4875 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,0645 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4591 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3865 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7585 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6393 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5110 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 249,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8608 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0160 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5765 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 050,27 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2298 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,887 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,4023 |
| THB | Thai baht | 38,066 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4665 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3146 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,8193 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1299

JPY

Japanese yen

139,19

DKK

Danish krone

7,4611

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71340

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2177

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0449

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8255

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,211

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,85

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1729

RON

Romanian leu

4,4875

TRY

Turkish lira

3,0645

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4591

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3865

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7585

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6393

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5110

KRW

South Korean won

1 249,77

ZAR

South African rand

13,8608

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0160

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5765

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 050,27

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2298

PHP

Philippine peso

50,887

RUB

Russian rouble

61,4023

THB

Thai baht

38,066

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4665

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3146

INR

Indian rupee

71,8193

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014447EN.01000401.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 December 2014

(2014/C 447/07)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2450 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 147,41 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4370 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79250 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3700 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2010 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,1190 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,590 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,45280 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1735 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4673 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8523 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5056 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4417 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6517 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5946 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6307 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 372,22 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4769 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7049 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 579,32 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3502 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,410 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 71,4175 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,824 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3071 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,5119 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,7677 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2450

JPY

Japanese yen

147,41

DKK

Danish krone

7,4370

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79250

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3700

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2010

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,1190

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,590

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,45280

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1735

RON

Romanian leu

4,4673

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8523

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5056

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4417

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6517

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5946

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6307

KRW

South Korean won

1 372,22

ZAR

South African rand

14,4769

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7049

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 579,32

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3502

PHP

Philippine peso

55,410

RUB

Russian rouble

71,4175

THB

Thai baht

40,824

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3071

MXN

Mexican peso

18,5119

INR

Indian rupee

77,7677

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015022EN.01000101.xml

| 23.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7472 — Rhône Capital/Goldman Sachs/Neovia)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 22/01)

On 16 January 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7472. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7472. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
1Judge King is recused and did not participate in this

decision.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-41345

In The Matter Of: SUPREME BEEF PROCESSORS INC

Debtor

-------------------------

STEPHEN ZAYLER, Trustee of the Estate of

Supreme Beef Processors Inc 

Appellant

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellees

- - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

- - - - -

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion November 16, 2004, 5 Cir., 2004, _____F.3d____)

(March 9, 2006)

BEFORE: JONES, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, SMITH,

WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART,

DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO and OWEN, Circuit Judges.1

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested

a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of

the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a

rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the

court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. 

The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of

supplemental briefs.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 9 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
---

---

EXHIBIT 13.2

# CERTIFICATION

# PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

# AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Guy Shafran, as Chief Financial Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)        the
accompanying Form 20-F report for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
          with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
          fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities           Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)        the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Dated:  May 22, 2006 |  | By:      /s/ Guy Shafran
Guy ShafranChief Financial Officer of the Company
|-------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
# C_2015339EN.01000201.xml

| 14.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 339/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 339/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7770 — Vitol/VTTI)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 339/02)

On 8 October 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7770. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7770. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hankersen International
Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Pengcheng Chen, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


May 21, 2007


By: /S/ PENGCHENG CHEN
    -------------------
    Pengcheng Chen, CEO
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 11, 2023

No. 04-22-00420-CR

Aaron POUCH,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. B19843-1

Honorable M. Rex Emerson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

After Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed an Anders brief, on November 22, 2022, 

we notified Appellant that if he desired to file a pro se brief, he must file it by January 3, 2023. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On January 3, 2023, Appellant filed a pro se motion for access to 

the appellate record. 

We direct the clerk of this court to send Appellant, by first-class mail, a printed copy of 

the clerk’s and reporter’s records at no cost to Appellant, and to mail the records within one day 

of the date of this order.

Appellant also requested additional time to file a pro se brief. The request is granted. 

We order Appellant to file his brief within forty days of the date of this order. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 38.6(d). If Appellant files a pro se brief, the State may file a responsive brief not later than 

thirty days after the date Appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. See id. R. 38.6(b).

If this court determines Appellant’s appeal is frivolous, Appellant may file a petition for 

discretionary review with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.4. 

Appellant must file the petition with the Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals within thirty 

days after this court issues its judgment. See TEX. R. APP. P. 68.2(a). The petition should be 

addressed to Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals, P.O. Box 12308, Austin, Texas 78711. 

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is held in abeyance pending further order of this court.
_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of January, 2023.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13457]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05891]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]


In the Matter of Global Leadership Institute, Inc.; Order of 
Suspension of Trading

March 11, 2015.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') that there is a lack of current and accurate 
information concerning the securities of Global Leadership Institute, 
Inc., formerly known as Cephas Holding Corp., (CIK No. 0001061169) 
(``Global''), because Global is delinquent in its periodic filings, 
having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for 
the period ended September 30, 2013 on March 21, 2014, which reported a 
net loss of $753,092 for the prior nine months. Global is a Delaware 
corporation located in Ann Arbor, Michigan with a class of securities 
registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Exchange Act''). The company's stock 
has experienced a recent substantial increase in both price and trading 
volume. The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and 
the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the 
securities of Global.
    Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange 
Act, that trading in the securities of Global Leadership Institute, 
Inc. is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 11, 2015, 
through 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 24, 2015.

    By the Commission.
Lynn M. Powalski,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05891 Filed 3-11-15; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
EXHIBIT
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350


(Section
      302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Limelight Media
      Group, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005, as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      David V. Lott, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
      to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






(1)  
      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)  
      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
              November
                  1, 2005
              
              By:
              /s/
                  David V. LottDavid
                  V. LottChief
                  Executive Officer













This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.