alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 3(g)

                      ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                              TO THE
                    ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                OF
                COMPUTERIZED THERMAL IMAGING, INC.

      We, the undersigned, David A. Packer, President of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc., and Kevin L. Packard, Secretary of Computerized Thermal
Imaging, Inc., do hereby certify:

     That pursuant to Nevada Revised Statutes Section 78.385 and Section
78.390, the undersigned corporation adopted the following Articles of
Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation.

     Article IV Section 1 of the Articles of Incorporation is amended in its
entirety to read:

                            ARTICLE IV

     1.      Authorized Stock.  The total number of shares of stock which the
Company shall have authority to issue is 203,000,000 shares, consisting of
200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share (the "Common
Stock"), and 3,000,000 shares of preferred stock (the "Preferred Stock")".

    The Board of Directors recommended and consented to this change and
amendment on April 14, 2000.

     The shareholders of the corporation adopted a resolution to change and
amend the Articles of Incorporation at a duly convened meeting of shareholders
held on June 27, 2000 by a shareholder vote of:

                           67,961,589 votes for
                            1,413,571 votes against
                              443,595 votes abstaining

which shareholder vote approved the amendment by at least a majority of each
class of stock outstanding and entitled to vote thereon.

Computerized Thermal Imaging, Inc.

By: /s/David A. Packer
--------------------------
David A. Packer, President


By: /s/Kevin L. Packard
---------------------------
Kevin L. Packard, Secretary

STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF DAVIS

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared David
A. Packer, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the

<PAGE> 68

foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the
purposes and consideration therein expressed.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of office this 30th day of June 2000.

/s/Anna S. Padlo
----------------------------
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE
STATE OF UTAH

STATE OF UTAH
COUNTY OF DAVIS

BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day personally appeared Richard
V. Secord, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same for the
purposes and consideration therein expressed.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL of office this 30th day of June 2000.

/s/Anna S. Padlo
----------------------------
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE
STATE OF UTAH


<PAGE> 69
**Docket:** ED - 2012 - ICCD - 0070 School Attendance Boundary Survey (SABS) 2013 and 2015 **Comment On:** ED - 2012 - ICCD - 0070 - 0001 Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; School Attendance Boundary Survey (SABS) 2013 and 2015 **Document:** ED - 2012 - ICCD - 0070 -DRAFT - 0006 Comment on FR Doc # N/A 

## Submitter Information **General Comment** I am a GIS user and an educational researcher who works with school attendance boundaries. It is a great idea for IES to become a clearinghouse for school zone data so long as it makes the data useable to a wide -range of constituents (especially the districts that provide the data). Will the project represent the original information provided by districts or will it change the data? I worry that the project will lose boundaries or not pay attention to some of the complexities of this type of geography. And the result will be that the project will lose the cooperation of school agencies. 

# PUBLIC SUBMISSION **As of:** February 20, 2013 **Received:** February 11, 2013 **Status:** Pending_Post **Category:** Institution of Higher Education **Tracking No.** 1jx- 83mn- 9ken **Comments Due:** February 19, 2013 **Submission Type:** Web Page 1 of 1

3/22/2013 file://C:\Program Files (x86)\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5963848521133955 ...
Order entered November 28, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01058-CV

ROBERT T. O’DONNELL, Appellant

V.

JULIA L. VARGO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-50667-2013

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s November 22, 2016 second motion for extension of time to file 

his brief and extend the time to DECEMBER 30, 2016. No further extensions will be granted 

absent extenuating circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
.. r 

., ... 

,• 

.... 

.. . . ~-

-~ .. ~. 

, 

'r • ""/ 

... _ i:~ ... 

Ill 

. .. REF ID:A66422 

~ J'OR got4.!l!J, JllVIS, P/P 

leferenee& Tel.9'tJ'pe Me•HP f'rom Colonel Ianaina, l8A Lid.•on Group, 1-.te&on (Attached). 

l. VJ.th n:tenin.ce to tbe m1uge Vbich 1• oited 111 the reference 

and. vhich :la bein& returned harevith, I took the •tter up vith Mr. V. 

Park Armetrong, Jr., 8pec1al Alaiatant to the lecretar,y ot State, and 

a.ttached hereto hi• action in n1ponee to m.r inquiey. 

Q, lt vou:Ld a:ppea.r that the State ?Jepa.rtmant and the Milita:ey 

Jlietorian ha~ coa to •ome l&ll'8••nt with regard to the ••Age or 

••11888• which are to be mentioned. :1n the f'orthcomina state Dep.rtrent 

:publication. Bonver, Mr. Armstrong did not inclu4e 1D hi• D8110randum 

aaq- conmnt on that pa.rt ot the la:a.aing meauge Which 8111'• ".. • • and 

1fOUld. include article d.eacrib~ tbe U.S. aucc•s• in 1ntercept1ng and 

&tcodil'lg Japanese trattic betore and during the Var." 

5. It u •uue•ted that the text~ au.ch an article ought 

properly be aubmitted to the Director, ISA, tor clearance. Jl'erbaps 

Colonel I.&naiJ:sa can pt t'rom the Militaey Bi•tor1an or trom JIG a 

cow ot vha.t 18 propc>aed to be included under thi• heading and give 

us a chfl.DQe to look it over. 

%ncl1 

&/• 

wtLIJAM ., • J'ftillJIAlf 

8pecia1 Aaaiatant 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

- " 
FROMs :RSA Pllfl'AOO?f LlA GROUP 

'l'O 1 DBP DIR, COMll1/S'SC 

REF ID:A66422 

IlQ'O COP.C 'l'.'Ot PLAB8 AID POLICY DIV 

HAVE BED APPROACHBD BY J!G 'l'O wrwm IF TJIBRi :rs ANY 

:RULING CO'VERIBG THE J'OLlDW'W 8ITUATIQN1 

8TA'l'B DUAR'l'MENT DESIRES TO PUBLISH Ali UNCLASSIFIED 

DOCtJM£!4T.ARY Bl'S'l'ORY OB WORU> WAR lI COIG'ERENCF.s. IT WOUW 

COIITAll A MBSSAOB DCM '.00.10 TO TD JAPADSE MI?tmTER IN HSCOW 

WBICH VAS SDT JUST JIRIQR 'l!O 'lU END OF 'rBB WAR AID wot.JU> :mcwm: 

.AllTICI.2 llESCRIB:tHG THE tJB SOOCESS I1f Il'lBRCBPrlHG ABD IECODING 

3APABESB T.RAJ"IIC BIFORB AID DUaXRG TD WAR. 

THE MILITARY lttS'l'ORIAH BBLIIVEB THIS SHOUJJ) HOT BR DONE 

1VD THOOOH IT IS 1QIOWH 'mAT JAPABESB CODES WERB BROKEN. 

llCRE'.r 

'.t'C1r1 29/l95"S/- SN 54-

'l'Clfta 29/J.954Z IOV 54
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00597-CV

Joel SALINAS,

Appellant

v.

Denise MUNOZ,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-14-325

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 23, 2016

DISMISSED

Appellant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of service 

to appellee, who has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion and dismiss the 

appeal. See TEX.R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred 

them.

PER CURIAM
---

---

EXHIBIT 10.2

# CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
No. 333-116429), pertaining to On Track Innovations Ltd.s 2001 Share Option Plan,
2001 Employee Share Purchase Plan and 1995 Share Option Plan, Forms F-3 (File Nos.
333-111770, 333-115953 and 333-121316) of On Track Innovations Ltd. and its subsidiaries
of our report dated March 25, 2005 with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of On
Track Innovations Ltd. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31,
2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for the year then ended included in the Amendment No.1 to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F /A for the year ended December 31, 2004.

Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
A member of KPMG International
Tel Aviv, Israel
October 26, 2005

81

---

---
# C_2014153EN.01000201.xml

| 21.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 153/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 153/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 May 2014

(2014/C 153/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3702 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4646 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81400 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0294 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2223 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1360 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,479 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,46 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1893 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4330 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8934 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4797 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4921 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6225 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5978 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7160 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 404,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,3419 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5470 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6175 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 708,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4109 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,921 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,3166 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,616 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0362 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7229 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,3485 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3702

JPY

Japanese yen

138,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4646

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81400

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0294

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2223

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1360

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,479

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,46

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1893

RON

Romanian leu

4,4330

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8934

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4797

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4921

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6225

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5978

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7160

KRW

South Korean won

1 404,75

ZAR

South African rand

14,3419

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5470

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6175

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 708,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4109

PHP

Philippine peso

59,921

RUB

Russian rouble

47,3166

THB

Thai baht

44,616

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0362

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7229

INR

Indian rupee

80,3485

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000840

23-MAY-2014

08:29 AM
# C_2015245EN.01000101.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 245/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 236, 20.7.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 228, 13.7.2015

OJ C 221, 6.7.2015

OJ C 213, 29.6.2015

OJ C 205, 22.6.2015

OJ C 198, 15.6.2015

OJ C 190, 8.6.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
AQUA CONDOMINIUM 

ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

AQUA CONDOMINIUM 

DEVELOPERS, LTD., an Alabama 

Limited Partnership, and AQUA 

HOLDINGS OF ALABAMA, 

L.L.C., an Alabama Limited 

Liability Company,

Appellees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0954

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 15, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County.

James B. Fensom, Judge.

David H. Milam and Robert L. Kauffman of Dunlap & Shipman, P.A., Santa Rosa 

Beach, for Appellant.

Clifford W. Sanborn of Barron & Redding, P.A., Panama City, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS and ROWE, JJ., and WELLS, LINDA ANN, ASSOCIATE JUDGE, 

CONCUR.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1601

In re: DEANDRE JOHNSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:19-cv-00562-RAJ-LRL)

Submitted: July 23, 2020 Decided: July 28, 2020

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Deandre Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Virginia prisoner Deandre Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an 

order directing the recusal of the magistrate judge assigned to his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2018) 

proceeding and directing the district court to grant Johnson relief on his petition. We 

conclude that Johnson is not entitled to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court, 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re MurphyBrown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only 

when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795. 

Moreover, mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal, In re Lockheed Martin 

Corp., 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). 

The relief sought by Johnson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny Johnson’s petitions for writ 

of mandamus and deny all pending motions. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# Time and Date:

Wednesday, April 15, 2015, 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time.

# Place:

Miami Dade College, 500 NE 2nd Avenue, Wolfson Conference Meeting Room #7128, Miami, Florida 33132.

# Status:

The meeting will be open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

*Open Session:*

1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and

2. EEOC at 50: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in the 21st Century Workplace.

# Note:

                         In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides information about Commission meetings on its Web site,                         *www.eeoc.gov.,*                         and provides a recorded announcement a week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

                    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign language interpretation and Communication Access Realtime Translation (CART) services at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.                     **CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:**                     Bernadette B. Wilson, Acting Executive Officer on (202) 663-4077.                

Dated: March 17, 2015.

Bernadette B. Wilson,

Acting Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2015-06440 Filed 3-17-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-4500

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus FELIPE MARTINEZ-GARCIA, a/k/a Daniel Espalla-Pedrasa, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:04-cr-00118-2) Submitted: December 14, 2006 Decided: December 19, 2006 Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Reid G. Brown, Waynesville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Jill Westmoreland Rose, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Felipe Martinez-Garcia pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamines, cocaine, and marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841; 846 (2000). Martinez-Garcia was sentenced to 188 months’ imprisonment. We affirm the conviction and sentence. Counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting there were no meritorious grounds for appeal, but raising the issue of whether the sentence imposed by the district court was reasonable. Although Martinez-Garcia was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief, he did not do so. Because the district court properly calculated and considered the advisory guideline range and weighed the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2000) factors, we conclude Martinez-Garcia’s 188-month sentence, which was below the statutory minimum and at the bottom of the advisory guideline range, is reasonable. See United States v. Hughes , 401 F.3d 540, 546-47 (4th Cir. 2005); see alsoUnited States v. Green , 436 F.3d 449, 457 (4th Cir.) (stating a sentence imposed within a properly calculated guideline range is presumptively reasonable), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 2309 (2006). In accordance with Anders , we have reviewed the entire record in this case and have found no meritorious issues for appeal. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in- 3 - writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Filed: January 13, 1998

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1894

(CA-97-224-5-BR-2)

Monika Gonzalez,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

James Askins, etc., et al,

Defendants - Appellees.

ORDER

The Court amends its opinion filed November 7, 1997, as

follows:

On the cover sheet, section 6 -- The status line is corrected

to read "Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion."

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

Clerk
2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1894

MONIKA GONZALEZ,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES ASKINS, Dr.; STANLEY K. GILBERT, Dr.;

WILLIAM S. BRITT,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District

Judge. (CA-97-224-5-BR-2)

Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 7, 1997

Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Monika Gonzalez, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

Appellant filed an untimely notice of appeal. We dismiss for

lack of jurisdiction. The time periods for filing notices of appeal

are governed by Fed. R. App. P. 4. These periods are "mandatory and

jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corrections, 434

U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S.

220, 229 (1960)). Parties to civil actions have thirty days within

which to file in the district court notices of appeal from judgments or final orders. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1). The only exceptions

to the appeal period are when the district court extends the time

to appeal under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6).

The district court entered its order and judgment on April 23,

1997; Appellant's notice of appeal was filed on July 8, 1997, which

is beyond the thirty-day appeal period. Appellant's failure to note

a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period leaves

this court without jurisdiction to consider the merits of Appellant's appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Order entered November 23, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00744-CV

ROBBIE LESA HAMES HORTON, Appellant

V.

KIMBERLY A. STOVALL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-14190

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 21, 2016 second unopposed motion for 

extension of time to file her brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER the brief filed 

by DECEMBER 7, 2016. 

We caution appellant that no further extension will be granted absent extenuating 

circumstances. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Eric L. Kelly, certify
that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Overland Storage, Inc.;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 24, 2014



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ ERIC L. KELLY            
|Eric L. Kelly,               
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)