alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 11.1

                               PICO PRODUCTS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT EARNINGS PER SHARE)

                                                              Three Months
                                                            Ended October 31,
                                                         -----------------------
                                                           1996           1995
                                                         --------       --------
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE
  TO COMMON STOCK                                        $    101       $      2
                                                         --------       --------
                                                         --------       --------

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:

  Weighted average number
    of common shares outstanding                            4,055          3,652

  Dilutive effect of stock options
    and warrants after application
    of treasury stock method                                  195            485
                                                         --------       --------
  Number of shares used to compute
    primary earnings per share                              4,250          4,137

Primary earnings per share                               $   0.02       $   0.00
                                                         --------       --------
                                                         --------       --------

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

  Weighted average number
    of common share outstanding                             4,055          3,652

  Dilutive effect of stock options
    and warrants after application
    of treasury stock method                                  195            485
                                                         --------       --------
  Number of shares used to compute
    fully diluted earnings per share                        4,250          4,137

Fully diluted earnings per share                         $   0.02       $   0.00
                                                         --------       --------
                                                         --------       --------
United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit 

No. 15-1945 

TUTOR PERINI CORPORATION, 

Plaintiff, Appellant, 

 v. 

BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES LLC, n/k/a Merrill Lynch, Pierce, 

Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, successor by merger; BANK OF 

AMERICA, N.A., 

 Defendants, Appellees. 

ERRATA SHEET 

The opinion for this Court issued November 21, 2016 is 

amended as follows: 

On page 3, line 5: change "cash-conscience" to "cashconscious" 

On page 30, footnote 13, third bulleted paragraph, line 

5: change "mangers" to "managers"
#### In the Matter of Clarendon Road, from East Fortieth to Forty-ninth Streets, and from Kings Highway to the Junction of Ralph and Ditmas Avenues, in the Borough of Brooklyn.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

October 30, 1937.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel [Robert H. Haskell*of counsel], for the City of New York.

*Greenberg & Silberman,*for the Loesch-Ganz Realty Co., Inc.

Lockwood, J.

The city moves to compel the claimant, Loesch-Ganz Realty Co., Inc., and its attorneys to make restitution of awards paid to them pursuant to the final decree and an order directing payment in this proceeding. The decree and order were subsequently vacated and nominal awards made for damage parcels 135 and 136. Out of the awards the attorneys received their disbursements and fees for services rendered in accordance with the agreement between them and the claimant. The decree and order under which the money was paid must be deemed to have been valid until set aside.

The application so far as restitution is sought from the attorneys is denied. *(Langley*v. *Warner,*3 N. Y. 327; *Millfield Realty Co.*v. *Catena,*257 id. 515; *Lowenstein*v. *Reikes,*258 id. 444; *Rinzler*v. *Citizens Sav. Bank,*271 id. 176; *Thaxter*v. *Thain,*100 App. Div. 488.)

In *Forstman*v. *Schulting*(108 N. Y. 110), relied upon by the city, the money was wrongfully received by the attorneys under an erroneous order, and unjustly retained. It was not paid under a judgment or decree valid at the time payment was made, as in the *627present case. In *Shotwell*v. *Dixon*(66 App. Div. 123) the money was paid to the attorneys through a misinterpretation of the order of the court. In *LeGros*v. *Chain Shirt*Shops, *Inc.*(187 App. Div. 371), the order of Special Term denying a motion to compel the attorney not of record to restore was affirmed. It was uncertain whether the sum paid to the attorney was from money retained by the attorney of record for disbursements and services in the action or from moneys collected over and above the reasonable and necessary expenses and disbursements. The court stated that the fact that the attorney was neither a party nor the attorney of record did not prevent the granting of the relief. The fact that the claimant consented to have the checks for fees and disbursements drawn by the city to the attorneys, rather than to collect the award and then pay the money over to the attorneys, does not change the situation. The awards were made and payable to the claimant. Payment to its assignees was payment to it.

The claimant shall be ordered to make restitution of the full awards.

Settle order on notice. '
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2561 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2561

 To amend the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 
1974 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to provide 
    that a land resource management plan or land use plan approved, 
 amended, or revised under those Acts shall not be considered to be a 
continuing Federal agency action or constitute a discretionary Federal 
 involvement or control for a distinct Federal purpose, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2021

 Mr. Daines (for himself and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act of 
1974 and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 to provide 
    that a land resource management plan or land use plan approved, 
 amended, or revised under those Acts shall not be considered to be a 
continuing Federal agency action or constitute a discretionary Federal 
 involvement or control for a distinct Federal purpose, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLANS AND 
              LAND USE PLANS.

    (a) National Forest System Land and Resource Management Plan.--
Section 6 of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act 
of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1604) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Completed Federal Action.--A land and resource management 
plan for a unit of the National Forest System approved, amended, or 
revised under this section shall not--
            ``(1) be considered to be a continuing Federal agency 
        action; or
            ``(2) constitute a discretionary Federal involvement or 
        control for a distinct Federal purpose.''.
    (b) Bureau of Land Management Land Use Plans.--Section 202 of the 
Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Completed Federal Action.--A land management plan approved, 
amended, or revised under this section shall not--
            ``(1) be considered to be a continuing Federal agency 
        action; or
            ``(2) constitute a discretionary Federal involvement or 
        control for a distinct Federal purpose.''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel
M. Healy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

/s/ Daniel M. HealyDaniel M. Healy
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to North Fork
Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by North Fork Bancorporation, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

34
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

# AGENCY:

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

NIOSH gives notice of a decision to evaluate a petition to designate a class of employees from the Argonne National Laboratory-West in Scoville, Idaho, to be included in the Special Exposure Cohort under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Stuart L. Hinnefeld, Director, Division of Compensation Analysis and Support, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1090 Tusculum Avenue, MS C-46, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1938, Telephone 877-222-7570. Information requests can also be submitted by email to                         *DCAS@CDC.GOV.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority: 42 CFR 83.9-83.12.

Pursuant to 42 CFR 83.12, the initial proposed definition for the class being evaluated, subject to revision as warranted by the evaluation, is as follows:

*Facility:*                     Argonne National Laboratory-West.                

*Location:*                     Scoville, Idaho.                

*Job Titles and/or Job Duties:*                     All workers who worked in any location.                

*Period of Employment:*                     April 10, 1951 through December 31, 1979.                

John Howard,

Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

[FR Doc. 2015-06786 Filed 3-24-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4163-19-P
# C_2015347EN.01000102.xml

| 20.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 347/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7457 — CVC/Paroc)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 347/02)

On 12 February 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7457. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7457. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
#### Sweet vs. Mitchell and others.

Except in cases where a review of an intermediate order is allowed upon appeal from a final judgment, the statute requires a *separate*appeal from each judgment or appealable order.

One notice of appeal from two orders, and one undertaking on appeal, though in a sum equal to the aggregate required by law in case of two separate appeals, are not sufficient.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Dane*County.

The case is stated by the court.

*J. Downer*and *Mat. H. Carpenter,*for appellant.

*James S. Brown,*for respondents.

*By the Court,*

DixoN, C. J.

The appeal in this .case must be dismissed. It is from two orders described in the notice as <! the order of the circuit court for the county of Dane, made in the aboye entitled action November 15th, 1862, overruling and denying the motion of said plaintiff for leave to make and file an amended complaint in said action,”, and “ the order of said circuit court made in said action on or about the 28th day of November, 1862, overruling and denying the motion of said plaintiff for leave to dismiss the complaint and action in this case without prejudice.” The undertaking follows the notice, and is given in the sum of $500. As to amount, the undertaking is not liable to be the objection urged in *White vs. Appleton,*14 Wis., 190. It equals the aggregate required by law in case a separate notice and undertaking had been given for each order. But the appeal is nevertheless irregular. As observed in *Chamberlain vs. Sage,*14 Wis., 193, except in cases where the review of an intermediate order is allowed upon appeal from a final judgment, the statute evidently contemplates a separate appeal from each judgment or appealable order. This is obvious from a perusal of the fourth and fifth sections of the act — chap. 264, Laws of 1860. Not only must there be a separate notice and undertaking, but a separate return to each order, so that the roll in this court may be distinct and *126complete without reference to any other return. Great difficulty and confusion would hare ensued in transacting the business and keeping the records of this court, had a different practice been provided. In this cage, were we to affirm one and reverse the other, two judgments would be required to give effect to the decision of the court upon a single appeal. Each party would be entitled to judgment for costs upon the order in which he had prevailed. Such a practice is not to be tolerated.

As to intermediate orders reviewed upon appeal from a judgment, the statute is but a re-enactment of the practice at common law in like cases. Double appeals are not allowed. The appeal is single from the judgment, the orders being saved by exceptions as provided in section twelve, which in an appeal from an order are unnecessary.

Appeal dismissed.
# CA2014283EN.01000601.xml

| 26.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 283/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 283/6

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

(2014/C 283 A/02)

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Annual Report on From 10-KSB of Computerized
Thermal Imaging, Inc. (the "Company") for the Year Ended June 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Amendment"), I, Richard V. Secord, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)      The Amendment fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Richard V. Secord



Richard V. Secord
Chief Executive Officer
October 11, 2004

         This certification accompanies the Amendment pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or it staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Vertrue  Incorporated (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the period  ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Gary A.  Johnson,
President,  Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company,  certify, to my
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Gary A. Johnson
---------------------------
Gary A. Johnson
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
Vertrue Incorporated

September 13, 2005







A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# CA2014289EN.01000401.xml

| 29.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 289/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 289/4

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 289 A/04

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

---