alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Unigene Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William
Steinhauer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ William Steinhauer     
|William Steinhauer         
|Vice President of Finance  
|Principal Financial Officer
|November 9, 2007           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unigene
Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



               REPORT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



To the Board of Directors of                                                 
HomeSide Lending, Inc.:



We have examined management's  assertion about HOMESIDE LENDING, INC. (a Florida
corporation) AND SUBSIDIARIES'  compliance with the minimum servicing  standards
identified  in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association  of America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE
ATTESTATION  PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS  ("USAP") and that the Company had in
effect  fidelity  bond and errors and  omissions  policies  in the amount of $76
million  and $20  million,  respectively,  as of  February  28, 1997 and for the
period from March 16, 1996 to February  28, 1997,  included in the  accompanying
management  assertion  letter.  Management  is  responsible  for  the  Company's
compliance with those minimum servicing standards and for maintaining a fidelity
bond and  errors  and  omissions  policy.  Our  responsibility  is to express an
opinion  on  management's  assertion  about the  Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing  standards and  maintenance of a fidelity bond and errors and
omissions policy based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Company's  compliance  with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the  Company's  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In  our  opinion,   management's  assertion  that  HomeSide  Lending,  Inc.  and
subsidiaries  complied with the aforementioned  minimum servicing  standards and
that the Company had in effect  fidelity bond and errors and omissions  policies
in the amount of $76 million and S20 million,  respectively,  as of February 28,
1997 and for the  period  from March 16,  1996 to  February  28,  1997 is fairly
stated in all material respects.


/s/Arthur Andersen LLP

Jacksonville, Florida
April 18, 1997
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Kenney, James (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:26 AM

To: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Subject: FW: 91.151 exemption

Jake,

Per our discussion this morning.  We agree that the exemption request should be withdrawn.

Best regards,

Jim Kenney

From: Wiegand, Skip (FAA) 

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:18 AM 

To: Kenney, James (FAA) 

Cc: footw@aol.com; Wilson, Mike (FAA) 

Subject: RE: 91.151 exemption 

I conferred with Mike  ‐ he and I authored it – and he concurs.  Here is your one liner:

Mike Wilson and Skip Wiegand – also speaking for Brad Howard – request to withdraw the petition for exemption.   

Thank you,

Skip Wiegand

From: Kenney, James (FAA) 

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 10:09 AM 

To: Wiegand, Skip (FAA) 

Subject: 91.151 exemption 

Skip,

I spoke with ARM concerning the close out of your 91.151 exemption.  Would you mind sending me a 1 sentence email

requesting that we withdraw the request?  This is the easiest way to close it out.

Best regards,

Jim
# C_2014397EN.01000301.xml

| 12.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 397/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 397/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2014/C 397/04

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Spain

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Spain

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Spain

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Unesco’s World Cultural and Natural Heritage Sites — Cave of Altamira

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The design depicts in the foreground the bison painting from the Cave of Altamira located in Cantabria. In the upper side of the image, in circular sense and with capital letters, the word ‘ESPAÑA’, at the bottom the year of issuance ‘2015’ and at the right the mint mark.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  :

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
(4910-13-P)

,IOUS' ••••lIOl

KOU'rING SYMBOl.

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

I\ \\

[Docket No. FAA-2009-***i<*j Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-147-AD]

RlN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2 10 (Regional Jet Series 700,

70] & 702), CL-600-2D 15 (Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet

Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new ainvorthiness directive (AD) for the products

listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory ebntinUing airworthiness

information (MCAI) originated by an aviation autbority or anotber country to identitY

and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. T e MeAl describes the unsafe

condition as:

During an elevator Power Control Unit (PCU) Ce9tering Functional

Check on two CL~600-2C10 aircraft., sust.ained oS(I;illationswere

discovered when a control rod was disconnected. these sustained

oscillat.ions could render the elevator surface inop~rable and cause

subsequent loss of pitch control of the aircraft .

Dh / 'I

IlO11Tu"G $\'MIlOL

-7

I~ITIAL.~'S'C;

C-~

I)~TU

H'"'/~"t

~OUTI~(;SYMBOL

-/1+

MU

11-2.0-lJ1

IN(; SI"lo"'''L

-·01

IN<TlAU\i~IG

DATE

oVrmCSYMllOl

* • * • • • •

Loss of pitch control could result in reduced controllabilittY of the airplane. The proposed

AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in

tbe MCAI.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Avilltion Administration

14 Cli'R })art 39

C<J.-.o.."'.~"""

14910~13-PI~71!l~~iOC

'~'H'" ULC

C.,\l1i. "

c.<l'Tf

09/,4- 09

"o,n,,'1;S\""""

1..(i]JIAJ,;O

RlN 2120-AA64

(DocketNo.l?AA-2009-***"""; nirectorate Identifier 20

1

09-NM-147-AI>I

I

Ainl'orthincss Dircctn.'cSj Bombardier Model CL-600-2il 0 (Regional Jet Series 700,

701 & 702), CL.-600-2D IS (Rcgional Jet Series 705), llnd I L-600-2D24 (Regional Jel

Series 900) Airplancs

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT

ACTION: Noti,e of proposed rulc!I111king(NPRM).

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness di ective (AD) for the products

listed above. This proposed AD resul!s from mandatory continuing airworthiness

information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority ofLlOther country to identify

Ilnd correct an unsafe condition on nn aviation product. ThJ MeAl describes the unsafe

condition ns:

During an elevator Power COl1lrollJnit (peU) Ccntpring Functional

Check on two CL-600-2CIO aircraft, sustained oscillations were

discovered when a control rod was disconnected. These sustaim:d

oscillations could render the elevator surface inoperable and cause

subsequent loss of pitch control of the aircraft .

,

• •

,

• •

Loss of pilch control could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The proposed b,,~,,~. --_.

AD would require actions that are intended to addre~s the nsafc condilion described in

the MeAl.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the following meeting:

*Name:*                     Advisory Committee for Engineering #1170.                

*Date/Time:*                     April 15, 2015: 12:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.; April 16, 2015: 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                

*Place:*                     National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 1235, Arlington, Virginia 22230.                

*Type of Meeting:*                     open.                

*Contact Person:*                     Evette Rollins, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 505, Arlington, Virginia 22230; 703-292-8300.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to engineering programs and activities.                

Agenda:

## Wednesday, April 15, 2015

    - Directorate for Engineering Report
    - Electrical, Communications, and Cyber Systems (ECCS) Overview
    - ECCS Committee of Visitors (COV) Report
    Broadening Participation in Engineering      ( print page 14416)    
    Thursday, April 16, 2015
    Perspectives from the Office of the Director
Emerging Frontiers of Research and Innovation (EFRI) Overview
EFRI Committee of Visitors (COV) Report
Roundtable on ENG Strategic Activities and Recommendations

    
Dated: March 13, 2015.

Suzanne Plimpton,

Acting, Committee Management Officer.

    
[FR Doc. 2015-06238 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Ofer Tziperman, as Chief Executive Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  April 30, 2013
By:
/s/ Ofer TzipermanOfer TzipermanChief Executive Officer of the Company
EXHIBIT 32(a)

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



I
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-KSB of Harbor Bankshares Corporation, (the
Company) for the annual period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                              |  |  |  |                    
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------
|                                                                              |  |  |  |                    
|                                                                              |  | 
|By: /s/ Joseph Haskins, Jr.                                                   |  |  |  | March 23, 2004 Date
|                                                                              |  |  | 
|Joseph Haskins, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Haskins, Jr. |  |  |
GEORGE PURVIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4347

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 10, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

James O. Shelfer, Judge.

Rachael E. Bushey of O'Brien Hatfield, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
** **

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 

**FORM 10-Q**

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TOSECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

or

 

[]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-10831

 

CONSOLIDATED CAPITALINSTITUTIONAL PROPERTIES, LP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

55 Beattie Place, PO Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  [X] Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6862

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

WAYNE D. THOMPSON, a/k/a Buck Naked, a/k/a Wayne Donnell 

Thompson,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:08-cr-00309-REP-1)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Wayne D. Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Angela 

Mastandrea-Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Wayne D. Thompson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and Thompson’s 

informal appellate brief and conclude that Thompson has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of 

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**
We have issued our reports dated March 9, 2005 accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand Schedule II, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of Famous Dave’s of America,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting. Both reports are included in the annual reportof Famous Dave’s of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2,2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the RegistrationStatements of Famous Dave’s of America, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No.’s 333-86358, 333-48492,333-95311, 333-54562, 333-65428 & 333-73504) and Forms S-8 (File No.’s 333-88928, 333-88930,333-88932, 333-16299, 333-49939 & 333-49965).       /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 1046** 

CHIGOZIE M. ENOCH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
ADVANCED BIOSCIENCE LABORATORIES, INC. , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. James K. Bredar , District Judge. ( 8:12

- cv
- 03701

- JKB )

Submitted : May 29, 2014 Decided: June 2, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Chigozie M. Enoch, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Rigatuso, John S. Vander Woude, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Chigozie M. Enoch appeals the district court ’ s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment in his civil
action alleging retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Act of 1964, as amended

. We have reviewed the record and find

no re versible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. Enoch v. Advanced Bioscience
Labs., Inc. , No. 8:12

- cv
- 03701

- JKB (D. Md. Jan. 10, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequ ately presented in the materials before

th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2538 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2538

     To reauthorize a program of grants to hospitals and emergency 
 departments to develop, implement, enhance, or study alternatives to 
          opioids for pain management, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 29, 2021

Mr. Booker (for himself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To reauthorize a program of grants to hospitals and emergency 
 departments to develop, implement, enhance, or study alternatives to 
          opioids for pain management, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alternatives to Opioids in the 
Emergency Department Reauthorization Act of 2021'' or the ``ALTO 
Reauthorization Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF EMERGENCY ALTERNATIVES TO OPIOIDS PROGRAM.

    Section 7091 of the SUPPORT for Patients and Communities Act (42 
U.S.C. 294i note) is amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by striking ``demonstration'';
            (2) in the headings of subsections (a) and (b), by striking 
        ``Demonstration'' each place it appears;
            (3) in subsections (a)(1) and (b), by striking 
        ``demonstration'' each place it appears;
            (4) in subsection (f)--
                    (A) by striking ``Not later than 1 year after 
                completion of the demonstration program under this 
                section'' and inserting ``Not later than the end of 
                each of calendar years 2022 and 2028''; and
                    (B) by striking ``demonstration'' after ``results 
                of the''; and
            (5) in subsection (g), by striking ``2019 through 2021'' 
        and inserting ``2022 through 2026''.
                                 <all>
```