alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**-~**

# ....,-.. ·-o '; '·· t )· • '·· 1- 1\L-V..._l \' 1- 

## 0PPT CGIC 

## 2012**~~us** 

## -6 AH 10= 46 DuPont Corporate Remediation Group Chestnut Run Plaza, Building 715 4417 Lancaster Pike August 3, 2012 Director, Chemical Control Division (7405M) Room 4146 EPA East U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 202-564-4760

Attn: EPA Docket ID Number OPPT-2004-0113 Wilmington, DE 19805 Document Control Office Office ofPollution Prevention and Toxics EPA East, Room 6428 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1201 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 202-564-8930

Memorandum ofUnderstanding (MOU) between the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and E. I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) for a Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program (November 3, 2005) Re: Quarterly MOU Status Report #6 Phase III- Future Work Plan, DuPont Washington Works (August 3, 2012)
Dear Sir/Madam: The Quarterly MOU Status Report #6 Phase Ill- Future Work Plan is submitted in accordance with Section V.F.2 ofthe above-identified MOU. The status report includes a briefdescription of the implementation status ofthe Phase III Future Work Plan. In addition, this report includes West Virginia National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) data and granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment monitoring data that were received by DuPont as ofJuly 20, 2012, that are not part ofthe Phase III MOU monitoring activities, but are provided by DuPont for completeness ofstudy. An index ofthe specific documents included with this status report is provided as an Attachment to this letter. Ifyou need any additional information or further clarification, please contact me (302-999-6197) orJenny Liu (302-999-3628). Very truly yours,

# ~.&~ AndrewS. Hartten Principal Remediation Project Manager Attachment: Index ofreport documents (I page) Enclosures: 1papercopy ofthe Quarterly MOU Status Report #6 Phase III- August 3, 2012 I digital copy ofthe Quarterly MOU Status Report #6 Phase III- August 3, 2012


## coNTA\NS NO CB

E.I. duPont de Nemours and CompanyDocket No. OPPT-2004-0113 EPA-DuPontMOU 

### Index August 3, 2012


### QuarterlyMOU Status Report#6 Phase III- 

### Future Work Plan Document/Report Title-Paper Copy 1paper copy ofthe Quarterly MOU Status Report#6 Phase III- Future Work Plan, DuPontWashington Works (OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program) 

### Document/Report Title-Electronic Copy CD 1of 1containing the Quarterly MOU Status Report #6, Phase III- Future Work Plan, DuPontWashington Works (OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-RelatedEnvironmental Assessment Program) as one PDF file titled, Quarterly MOU SR #6 Phase III

- FWP 080312.PDF


### *Page count does not include blank pages caused by double-sided printing ofthe tables.



## CONTAINS NO CB No. ofPages* 237 pages



### No. ofPages 235 pages

Page 2 of2 OPPT-2004-0113 PFOA Site-Related Environmental Assessment Program
# C_2015406EN.01000101.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 406/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 398, 30.11.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 389, 23.11.2015

OJ C 381, 16.11.2015

OJ C 371, 9.11.2015

OJ C 363, 3.11.2015

OJ C 354, 26.10.2015

OJ C 346, 19.10.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 32

 (a) Certification of Annual Report by Chief Executive Officer.

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Dilworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Robert Dilworth
                                       --------------------
                                       Robert Dilworth
                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                       March 30, 2004



<PAGE>




(b) Certification of Annual Report by Chief Financial Officer.


                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of GraphOn Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William Swain, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ William Swain
                                       -----------------
                                       William Swain
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       March 30, 2004
# C_2015183EN.01000201.xml

| 4.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 183/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 183/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7605 — Equistone Partners Europe/Groupe Averys)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 183/03)

On 27 May 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7605. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7605. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2689 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure that children 

in foster care who are placed in a qualified residential treatment program 

are eligible for Medicaid. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 10, 2021 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure 

that children in foster care who are placed in a qualified 

residential treatment program are eligible for Medicaid. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Ensuring Medicaid 

5 Continuity for Children in Foster Care Act of 2021’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2689 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE WHO 

2 ARE PLACED IN A QUALIFIED RESIDENTIAL 

3 TREATMENT PROGRAM FROM THE MEDICAID 

4 IMD EXCLUSION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1905(a)(31)(B) of the So6 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(a)(31)(B)) is amended 

7 by inserting ‘‘and services provided to any individual who 

8 is a child in foster care under the responsibility of a State 

9 who has been placed in a child care institution that is a 

10 qualified residential treatment program (as defined in sec11 tion 472(k)(4)), without regard to whether payments are 

12 made on behalf of such child under section 472’’ after 

13 ‘‘section 1915(l)’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall take effect on October 1, 2021, and 

16 shall apply with respect to items and services furnished 

17 in calendar quarters beginning on or after that date. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
MARIA SHEMEKA JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2998

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela Cox, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2015374EN.01000101.xml

| 11.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7631 — Royal Dutch Shell/BG Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 374/01)

On 2 September 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7631. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7631. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015438EN.01000501.xml

| 30.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 438/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 438/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

29 December 2015

(2015/C 438/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0952 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 131,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4629 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74005 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1567 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0846 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,5115 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,028 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,26 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2364 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5370 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 3,1878 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5056 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5241 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4882 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5949 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5467 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 282,17 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 16,7598 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1065 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6383 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 029,86 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,7055 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 51,514 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 79,4319 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,518 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 4,2187 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,8429 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 72,6458 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0952

JPY

Japanese yen

131,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4629

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74005

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1567

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0846

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,5115

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,028

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,26

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2364

RON

Romanian leu

4,5370

TRY

Turkish lira

3,1878

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5056

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5241

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4882

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5949

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5467

KRW

South Korean won

1 282,17

ZAR

South African rand

16,7598

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1065

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6383

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 029,86

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,7055

PHP

Philippine peso

51,514

RUB

Russian rouble

79,4319

THB

Thai baht

39,518

BRL

Brazilian real

4,2187

MXN

Mexican peso

18,8429

INR

Indian rupee

72,6458

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015142EN.01000401.xml

| 29.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

28 April 2015

(2015/C 142/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0927 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,09 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4607 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,71500 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3808 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0464 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3920 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,471 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 301,35 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0015 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4026 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9161 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3752 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3188 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4696 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4226 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4433 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 167,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0108 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7806 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5860 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 149,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8755 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 48,320 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 57,0315 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,611 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1786 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7325 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,9985 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0927

JPY

Japanese yen

130,09

DKK

Danish krone

7,4607

GBP

Pound sterling

0,71500

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3808

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0464

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3920

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,471

HUF

Hungarian forint

301,35

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0015

RON

Romanian leu

4,4026

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9161

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3752

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3188

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4696

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4226

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4433

KRW

South Korean won

1 167,18

ZAR

South African rand

13,0108

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7806

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5860

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 149,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8755

PHP

Philippine peso

48,320

RUB

Russian rouble

57,0315

THB

Thai baht

35,611

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1786

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7325

INR

Indian rupee

68,9985

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
.... 

21.;.42 

AOK" 11 

G-2 Section 

Date 

13.3.42 

Literal translation frcr.i the G-2 Reports of the Staff' 

of the (Hussian) 5'1.st Army 

According to Radie Intelligence of the Front Staff, 

the staff of the Ru~anian cavslry brigade lies in 

the vicinity or Schucrino-IladgGdshao 

Af'ter careful investigati0n: 

a) 

b) 

The 140 German I.R. divisior. subordinaticn to 

be established, is in Saly. The 28th mo tvrized div (German) w1 th the 83, 84 and 

49th motorized regts subordinate is ?!lOVing up 

to the J(rimea. 84 Regt is in the vicinity of 

Starya Krym. 49th motorized regt is moving 

c) 

d) 

up to the vicinity of Nikolaev, 83 mot regt is 

moving up, location not Lnown. 

l Regt was moving U'I.') in the vicinity or V11nt:a, 

num.bel• not kncwn 

Battle Hq 0£ :XXXXII Army is in Bajratsch 

Entries for follovJing days are V man, Air Reccem, P\'J interros~tior. etc. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY Form 251-10 

\
# C_2015055EN.01000101.xml

| 14.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7469 — Itochu/Hitachi Construction Machinery/Hitachi Construction Machinery Finance Indonesia/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 55/01)

On 26 January 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7469. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7469. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Order entered November 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00869-CV

MARK JOSLIN, Appellant

V.

ELAD BANAI AND ISAAC BANAI, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 006-02799-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 18, 2016 second motion for an extension of 

time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT appellant’s motion.

We ORDER the brief be filed within THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART 

JUSTICE
SUBSIDIARIES OF FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC.
 Entity
    
    FEIN
    
    
    % of OwnershipD&D of Minnesota, Inc.
    
    
    41-1856702
    
    
    
    100
    %Famous Daves Ribs of Maryland, Inc.
    
    
    41-1958496
    
    
    
    96
    %Famous Daves Ribs, Inc.
    
    
    41-1884517
    
    
    
    100
    %Famous Daves Ribs-U, Inc.
    
    
    41-1884548
    
    
    
    100
    %FDA Properties, Inc.
    
    
    36-4379010
    
    
    
    100
    %Lake & Hennepin BBQ and Blues, Inc.
    
    
    41-1834594
    
    
    
    100
    %Minwood Partners, Inc.
    
    
    51-0396229
    
    
    
    100
    %
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 24, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-30680

Conference Calendar

ANTHONY JOSEPH WILLIAMS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CURT WAINWRIGHT; JOSH OTWELL; ANGIE HUFF; RAY HANSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 5:05-CV-34

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Joseph Williams, Louisiana prisoner # 397646,

appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights

complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). 

Williams argues that the district court misconstrued his

complaint as seeking relief for a deprivation of property which

occurred in November 2003, when in fact the complaint alleged

claims arising out of a January 2005 incident of retaliation. 

The record shows that Williams submitted the complaint to

prison authorities for mailing on December 26, 2004; thus, it is
No. 05-30680

-2-

not possible that the complaint alleged claims arising out of an

incident occurring in January 2005. Accordingly, the dismissal

of the complaint was not an abuse of discretion. See Siglar v.

Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). Williams’s appeal

is without arguable merit and is therefore dismissed as

frivolous. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir.

1983); see 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

The district court’s dismissal of Williams’s complaint and

this court’s dismissal of his appeal count as two strikes under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387

(5th Cir. 1996). Williams is cautioned that if he accumulates

three strikes, he may no longer proceed in forma pauperis in any

civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained

in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious

physical injury. See § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.