alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TVI Corporation (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report) I, Karin McQuade, Chief Financial Officer and Vice PresidentFinance, of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                     
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 12, 2004 |  | /s/ Karin McQuade                                   
|                         |  | Karin McQuade                                       
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through March 20, 2017.

                    For information, contact Simon McNabb, Designated Federal Officer, Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, Patriot's Plaza, 395 E Street SW., M/S P06, Washington, DC 20201, telephone 202/245-0550 or fax 202/245-0599, Email:                     *BOL1@cdc.gov.*

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2015-06649 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
**Company Committee**  **#People $Food Setup** **$Food $Coffee** 

ONYX LV 1 40 30.68 4.68 Earthjustice MV 1 24 28.28 3.9 NWPower MV 1 24 28.28 3.9 BGE MV 1 24 28.28 3.9 Howard MV 1 24 28.28 3.9 ABB MV 1 24 28.28 3.9 AL MV 1 24 28.28 3.9 EEI MV 1 24 28.28 3.9 Progress MV 1 24 28.28 3.9 PG&E LV, MV 1 64 58.68 8.58 ACEEE LV, MV 1 64 58.68 8.58 Xcel LV, MV 1 64 58.68 8.58 Schneider LV 2 80 61.36 9.36 Eaton LV 2 40 61.36 9.36 Fayetteville MV 2 40 56.56 7.8 NRECA MV 2 40 56.56 7.8 Cooper MV 2 40 56.56 7.8 GE Prolec MV 2 40 56.56 7.8 Lakeview LV, MV 2 64 117.36 17.16 NEMA LV, MV 2 64 117.36 17.16 DOE LV, MV 2 64 117.36 17.16 ASAP LV, MV 2 64 117.36 17.16 FedPac LV, MV 2 64 117.36 17.16 AK Steel LV, MV 2 64 117.36 17.16 NRDC LV, MV 2 64 117.36 17.16 APPA MV 3 24 84.84 11.7 Metglas LV, MV 3 64 176.04 25.74 (DOE support)LV, MV 4

**Totals:** Highlighted = nonprofits**$Room A/V (conference caller)** **$Total Pro-Rated Total**  50 10135.36 155.13 30 6.25 92.43 46.22 30 6.25 92.43 112.20 30 6.25 92.43 112.20 30 6.25 92.43 112.20 30 6.25 92.43 112.20 30 6.25 92.43 112.20 30 6.25 92.43 112.20 30 6.25 92.43 112.20 80 16.25227.51 247.28 80 16.25227.51 113.76 80 16.25227.51 247.28 50 10210.72 230.49 50 10170.72 190.49 30 6.25140.61 160.38 30 6.25140.61 160.38 30 6.25140.61 160.38 30 6.25140.61 160.38 80 16.25294.77 314.54 80 16.25294.77 314.54 80 16.25294.77 314.54 80 16.25294.77 147.39 80 16.25294.77 314.54 80 16.25294.77 314.54 80 16.25294.77 147.39 30 6.25156.79 176.56 80 16.25362.03 381.80 80 1500 5083.42 19.77(total that must be added to each for-profit to create pro-rates)(total that must be added to each for-profit to create pro-rates)
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Glen Burnie Bancorp (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is
an exhibit (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and                                                                
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and result of operations of the Company for the periods
reflected therein.

|                     |  |                                                                                     
|-------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 24, 2003 |  | /s/ F. William Kuethe, Jr.
F. William Kuethe, Jr.
President, Chief Executive Officer
|                    
|                     |  | /s/ John E. Porter
John E. Porter
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2015008EN.01000202.xml

| 13.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7277 — Eli Lilly/Novartis Animal Health)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 8/04)

On 3 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7277. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7277. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014417EN.01000601.xml

| 21.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 417/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 417/6

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

2014/C 417/04

Image

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Germany

National side of the new commemorative 2-euro coin intended for circulation and issued by Germany

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Germany

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : Niedersachsen from the ‘Lander’ series

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The desigh shows the Church of St. Michael in Hildesheim, Lower Saxony which has been on the Unesco World Cultural Heritage list since 1985. At the top the year of issuance ‘2014’ and at the left the mintmark (A, D, F, G, J). At the bottom, the inscription ‘NIEDERSACHSEN’ and underneath the indication of the issuing country ‘D’. At the top right, the initials of the engraver OE (Ott Erich).

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  : 30 million

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : January 2014

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0689

CITY OF MISSOULA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

FATON SADIKU,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 21, 2020, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 15 2020

07/15/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0689
AGENDA

Pfizer Animal Health

Product-Specific Mitigation Meeting

Tuesday, June 1, 2010, at 3:00 pm

Room TBD

I. Introductions

II. Pfizer Presentation

III. Agency Response

IV. Petting Study Protocol Discussion

V. Other Issues

VI. Questions and Answers

VII. Next Steps
#### DeWitt vs. Cullings.

*Action for wages*— Recoupment *of damages.*

Where one hires himself out to do a particular kind of labor, representing himself as having skill therein, if he fails to use such skill, the employer may recoup the damages resulting to him from such failure, to the full amount claimed hy the employee in an action to recover for his labor.

APPEAL from the Municipal Court of the *City of Bipon.*

*Hamilton & Sutherland*and *K L.*Runals, for appellant.

*Dobbs &*Pierce, for respondent.

LyoN, J.

This is an action to recover an alleged balance .due from the defendant to the plaintiff for work and labor. The defense set up in the answer is, that the defendant employed the plaintiff to dry hops for him, that the latter held *299bimself out as an expert in that business, but that be dried tbe defendant’s bops in a negligent and unskillful manner, whereby tbe' defendant was damaged, etc. Tbe testimony tended to prove sucb defense. Tbe plaintiff recovered judgment in tbe court below for tbe full amount of bis claim, and tbe defendant bas appealed to this court.

The court refused to give the following instructions to tbe jury as requested by tbe defendant, and no instruction equivalent thereto was given : “ If tbe plaintiff claimed to the defendant to have skill in tbe drying of bops, and hired himself out to tbe defendant to dry his bops, be was bound to use sucb skill as was necessary to properly do tbe work; and if be failed, and the defendant sustained damages, be may recoup tbe same in this action, though they might equal tbe plaintiff’s claim.” This instruction contains a correct statement of tbe law of the case, and should have been given.

Tbe judgment must be reversed, and a *venire de novo*awarded.

*By the Court.*— So ordered.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the "registrant")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, William M. McKay,
Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


March 30, 2006


/s/     William M. McKay
        ----------------
        William M. McKay
        Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 8



SUBSIDIARIES



The following are our significant subsidiaries, as that term is defined by applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission



|                    |  |                          |  |                                    
|------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------
|Company Name        |  | Country of Incorporation |  | Proportion of Ownership Interest(1)
|Smedvig Rig AS      |  | Norway                   |  | 100%                               
|Smedvig Offshore AS |  | Norway                   |  | 100%                               
|AS Smedvig Prodrill |  | Norway                   |  | 100%                               
|Smedvig Asia Ltd    |  | Hong Kong                |  | 100%                               



(1) Ownership percentage reflects
proportion of voting power, as well as economic interest in the company
Order entered March 23, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00199-CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

V.

JUANITA JERNIGAN, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MB18-54318-M

ORDER

Before the Court is the State’s March 10, 2020 motion to abate the appeal 

for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The motion asserts, and the clerk’s 

record on file at the Court confirms, that the State filed a February 14, 2020 request 

for findings of fact and conclusions of law after the trial court granted Juanita 

Jernigan’s motion to suppress. We GRANT the State’s March 10, 2020 motion.

We ORDER the Honorable Pamela Luther, Presiding Judge, County 

Criminal Court of Appeals No. 2, Dallas County, to issue, on or before APRIL 
20, 2020, findings of fact and conclusions of law. See State v. Elias, 339 S.W.3d 

667, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 2011); State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 2006). If necessary, the judge may review the reporter’s record of the 

testimony upon which the original ruling was made to refresh her recollection of 

the reasons behind such ruling. See Wicker v. State, 740 S.W.2d 779, 784 (Tex. 

Crim. App. 1987).

We ORDER Dallas County Clerk John Warren to file a supplemental 

clerk’s record containing the trial court’s findings and conclusions on or before 

APRIL 23, 2020.

We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to the 

Honorable Pamela Luther, Presiding Judge, County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 

2, Dallas County; Dallas County Clerk John Warren; and counsel for the parties.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court an opportunity to comply 

with this order. It shall be reinstated when the supplemental clerk’s record is filed 

or when the Court deems it appropriate to do so.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE
# C_2015122EN.01000102.xml

| 16.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 122/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7526 — G.L. Swarovski/Bilfinger/ProfiCare)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 122/02)

On 10 April 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7526. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7526. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1778

JOSEPH E. MACON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

CHARLES R. BEDDINGFIELD, their official

capacities as police officers for the City of

Williamston, County of Anderson; D. B. BROOKS,

their official capacities as police officers

for the City of Williamston, County of

Anderson; DAVID J. ROGERS, official capacity

as dogcatcher for the City of Williamston,

County of Anderson,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Anderson. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge. (CA02-3734-8-26-BI)

Submitted: August 12, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph E. Macon, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Frederick Lindemann,

DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Joseph E. Macon appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Macon v.

Beddingfield, No. CA-02-3734-8-26-BI (D.S.C. filed June 7, 2004 &

entered June 8, 2004). We deny appellees’ motion to dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 16, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 16, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0457. CHARLES BRANDON FLETCHER v. THE STATE.

The appellant in this case failed to comply with the notice of docketing mailed by this 

Court and with Court of Appeals Rules 22 (a) and 23 (a), regarding the filing of an enumeration 

of errors and brief within twenty days after the appeal was docketed. See also Court of Appeals 

Rule 13.

On October 28, 2016, this Court ordered the appellant to file an enumeration of errors 

and a brief no later than November 07, 2016. As of the date of this order, the appellant's 

enumeration of errors and brief still have not been filed. Accordingly, this appeal is deemed 

abandoned and is hereby ordered DISMISSED. Court of Appeals Rules 7, 23 (a).
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unigene Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, William Steinhauer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ William Steinhauer     
|William Steinhauer         
|Vice President of Finance  
|Principal Financial Officer
|May 10, 2007               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unigene
Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.