alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015235EN.01000101.xml

| 18.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 235/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 235/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 July 2015

(2015/C 235/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0889 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,01 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4621 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,69830 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3435 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0431 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,8805 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,054 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,84 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1053 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4190 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8862 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4712 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4132 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,4394 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6619 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4870 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 249,02 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,4191 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,7615 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6000 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 529,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1343 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,212 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 61,9170 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,189 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4455 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2141 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,1166 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0889

JPY

Japanese yen

135,01

DKK

Danish krone

7,4621

GBP

Pound sterling

0,69830

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3435

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0431

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,8805

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,054

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,84

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1053

RON

Romanian leu

4,4190

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8862

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4712

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4132

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,4394

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6619

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4870

KRW

South Korean won

1 249,02

ZAR

South African rand

13,4191

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,7615

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6000

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 529,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1343

PHP

Philippine peso

49,212

RUB

Russian rouble

61,9170

THB

Thai baht

37,189

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4455

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2141

INR

Indian rupee

69,1166

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015113EN.01000102.xml

| 8.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7546 — Apollo/Delta Lloyd)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 113/02)

On 31 March 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7546. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7546. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015038EN.01000401.xml

| 4.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/4

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,05 % on 1 February 2015

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 February 2015

(2015/C 38/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1376 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,48 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4440 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,75395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4118 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0526 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6370 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,748 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,18 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1620 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4033 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7382 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4799 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4316 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,8214 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5742 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5362 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 251,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0318 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,1180 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,7090 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 358,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0819 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,136 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,8145 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,120 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0848 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8433 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,2086 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1376

JPY

Japanese yen

133,48

DKK

Danish krone

7,4440

GBP

Pound sterling

0,75395

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4118

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0526

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6370

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,748

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,18

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1620

RON

Romanian leu

4,4033

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7382

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4799

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4316

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,8214

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5742

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5362

KRW

South Korean won

1 251,26

ZAR

South African rand

13,0318

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,1180

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,7090

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 358,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0819

PHP

Philippine peso

50,136

RUB

Russian rouble

75,8145

THB

Thai baht

37,120

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0848

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8433

INR

Indian rupee

70,2086

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-40471

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

PEDRO ISRAEL RIOS-SALAZAR, also known as Pedro Rios, also known as 

Erick Rios,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:15-CR-1073-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro Israel RiosSalazar has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance 

with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 

F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rios-Salazar has not filed a response. We have 

reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 29, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-40471 Document: 00513776037 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
No. 16-40471

2

therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no 

nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave 

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-40471 Document: 00513776037 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/29/2016
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Yi Tong, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







August 13, 2010
By:
/s/ Yi TongYi Tong, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF

C.R.A.,

A JUVENILE

§

§

§

§

No. 08-16-00144-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1

§

Of Denton County, Texas

§

(TC# JV-2014-00159)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. It appearing to this Court that 

Appellant is indigent, we make no further order as to payment of costs on appeal. This decision 

shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2016.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
# C_2016026EN.01000801.xml

| 23.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 26/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 26/8

---

Corrigendum to the calls for proposals under the work programme for grants in the field of the trans-European telecommunication networks under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 362 of 31 October 2015
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 362 of 31 October 2015

(2016/C 26/08)

The European Commission, Directorate-General for Communications Networks, Content and Technology is announcing a corrigendum to the ‘CEF-TC-2015-1: Electronic invoicing — eInvoicing’ call for proposals under the work programme for grants in the field of the trans-European telecommunication networks under the Connecting Europe Facility for the period 2014-2020, as published in the Official Journal (2015/C 362/09).

The new deadline for the submission of proposals for this call is 11 February 2016.

The corrigendum to the call for proposals is available on:

https://ec.europa.eu/inea/en/connecting-europe-facility/cef-telecom/apply-funding/2015-cef-telecom-call-einvoicing-2015-cef-tc-1

---
SUBSIDIARIES OF FAMOUS DAVES OF AMERICA, INC.
 Entity
    
    FEIN
    
    % of OwnershipD&D of Minnesota, Inc.
    
    
    41-1856702
    
    
    
    100
    %Famous Daves Ribs of Maryland, Inc.
    
    
    41-1958496
    
    
    
    96
    %Famous Daves Ribs, Inc.
    
    
    41-1884517
    
    
    
    100
    %Famous Daves Ribs-U, Inc.
    
    
    41-1884548
    
    
    
    100
    %FDA Properties, Inc.
    
    
    36-4379010
    
    
    
    100
    %Lake & Hennepin BBQ and Blues, Inc.
    
    
    41-1834594
    
    
    
    100
    %Minwood Partners, Inc.
    
    
    51-0396229
    
    
    
    100
    %
# C_2015429EN.01000101.xml

| 21.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 429/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 429/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

(2015/C 429/01)

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 414, 14.12.2015

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 406, 7.12.2015

OJ C 398, 30.11.2015

OJ C 389, 23.11.2015

OJ C 381, 16.11.2015

OJ C 371, 9.11.2015

OJ C 363, 3.11.2015

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Memo to Docket

Presentation to the Mobile Sources Technical Review Subcommittee of the Clean Air Act Advisory 

Committee 

October 5, 2010

EPA National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory

2000 Traverwood

Ann Arbor, MI 48105

Three presentations (attached) were given on the Fuel Economy Labeling Proposal, by:

Lisa Snapp (US EPA)

Luke Tonachel (NRDC)

Bob Holycross (Ford)

A few clarifying questions were asked.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-23-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-23-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,612
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,188
<ALLOWANCES>                                       244
<INVENTORY>                                        534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,906
<PP&E>                                          13,677
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,139
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,668
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,576
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           31,037
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,945)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,668
<SALES>                                          2,444
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,135
<CGS>                                            1,696
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,370
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  52
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,184)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,197)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,197)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.20)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of June 30, 2008 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended June 30, 2008.



/s/    Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
the Board of DirectorsDated: August 8, 2008




-42-
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Accessory Specialists Incorporated(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Anthony N. DeMint, President and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

2.    The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

/s/ Anthony N.DeMint                    

Anthony N. DeMint

President and

Chief AccountingOfficer

 

May 20, 2005
Order entered November 28, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01196-CV

WANDA LEE BOWLING, Appellant

V.

LESTER JOHN DAHLHEIMER, JR. AND LESTER JOHN DAHLHEIMER, SR.,

Appellee

On Appeal from the 469th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 469-51274-2015

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s November 22, 2016 emergency motion to stay pending 

appeal in which she seeks a stay of enforcement of the divorce decree that is the subject of this 

appeal. Appellant has also filed an emergency motion to stay pending appeal in the trial court. 

The trial court has the authority and continuing jurisdiction to suspend enforcement of a 

judgment pending appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 24.3; see also Thompson v. Coleman, 01-01-00114-

CV, 2002 WL 1340314, at *7 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] June 20, 2002, pet. ref’d). Rule 

24.4 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure permits this Court to review a trial court’s ruling 

on a motion to suspend enforcement of a judgment but does not provide an independent basis for 

appellate jurisdiction. TEX. R. APP. P. 24.4; see Transcon. Realty Inv'rs, Inc. v. Orix Capital 
Markets LLC, 470 S.W.3d 844, 848 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2015, no pet.). Appellant presents this 

Court with no such order to review. Rather, her motion to stay enforcement of the judgment 

remains pending in the trial court. Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s motion to stay without 

prejudice to appellant seeking review of an order from the trial court on the motion to stay 

pending appeal filed by appellant in the trial court. 

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Jamie Cross, * From the 29th District Court

of Palo Pinto County,

 Trial Court No. C45718.

Vs. No. 11-14-00224-CV * November 30, 2016

Martha and James Eugene Littlefield, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is 

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred 

by reason of this appeal are taxed against Jamie Cross.
<PAGE>

                                  [EXHIBIT 11]

                         NORTH FORK BANCORPORATION, INC.

              COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                  JUNE 30, 2002
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 THREE MONTHS ENDED                     SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          JUNE 30, 2002      JUNE 30, 2001     JUNE 30, 2002      JUNE 30, 2001
                                                          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>                <C>               <C>                <C>
Net Income .........................................       $104,450,998      $ 78,219,145       $202,750,941      $156,646,203

Common Equivalent Shares:

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding .........        160,577,644       159,391,536        160,444,876       159,300,171
Weighted Average Common Equivalent Shares ..........          1,910,217         1,781,142          1,888,623         1,669,741
                                                          ---------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares        162,487,861       161,172,678        162,333,499       160,969,912
                                                          =====================================================================
Net Income per Common Equivalent Share - Basic .....       $       0.65      $       0.49       $       1.26      $       0.98
Net Income per Common Equivalent Share - Diluted ...       $       0.64      $       0.49       $       1.25      $       0.97
</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6202

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANDRE ALBERT ADDISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District

Judge. (CR-98-210; CA-04-1205-WMN)

Submitted: November 22, 2005 Decided: December 2, 2005

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andre Albert Addison, Appellant Pro Se. Jamie M. Bennett,

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Andre Albert Addison seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a

§ 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by

a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner

satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists

would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that

any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also

debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee,

252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed

the record and conclude that Addison has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED