alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2014332EN.01000301.xml

| 24.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 332/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 332/3

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 332 A/03

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 293 | (NL) |
| 295 | (MT) |
| 297 | |
| 299 | |
| 304 | |
| 321 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 325 | (SL) |
| 332 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

293

(NL)

295

(MT)

297

299

304

321

(DE/EN/FR)

325

(SL)

332

---
May 16, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CLIFFORD STARKS, Appellant

NO. 14-12-01001-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the motion of the appellant to withdraw notice of 

appeal. Having considered the motion the Court orders the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 23 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 23

   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2021

 Mr. Crapo (for himself and Mr. Risch) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize an additional district judgeship for the district of 
                                 Idaho.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT JUDGESHIP FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint, by and with the 
advice and consent of the Senate, 1 additional district judge for the 
district of Idaho.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table in section 
133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to Idaho and inserting the following:

``Idaho....................................................         3''.
 

                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          34,700
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  564,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                    28,500
<INVENTORY>                                    264,100
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               905,400
<PP&E>                                         610,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,830,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          558,400
<BONDS>                                      1,629,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     54,600
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (701,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,830,700
<SALES>                                      2,252,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,252,200
<CGS>                                          765,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  765,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,500
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             137,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (20,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (25,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                (64,200)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (51,700)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (141,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00218-CV

MAPP CONSTRUCTION, LLC APPELLANT

V.

BUILDERS FIRSTSOURCE–TEXAS 

GROUP, LP

APPELLEE 

------------

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 2015-007164-1

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant’s Agreed Voluntary Dismissal Motion.” We 

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which 

let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and WALKER, J. 

DELIVERED: November 23, 2016

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
<PAGE>   1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
                            ------------------------

                                  FORM 10-K/A
[X]   ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                  FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999

[ ]   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

          FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM ____________ TO ____________

                        COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 333-26861

                            TRENDWEST RESORTS, INC.
               (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN CHARTER)

<TABLE>
<S>                                            <C>
                    OREGON                                       93-1004403
(STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF ORGANIZATION)        (IRS EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NO.)

              9805 WILLOWS ROAD                                    98052
                 REDMOND, WA                                     (ZIP CODE)
   (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)
</TABLE>

                                 (425) 990-2300
              (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE)

          SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(B) OF THE ACT:
                                      NONE

          SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:
                           COMMON STOCK, NO PAR VALUE
                                (TITLE OF CLASS)

     Aggregate market price of shares held by non-affiliates at March 20, 2000
was $50,141,385.25, consisting of 2,145,086 shares.

     The number of shares of common stock outstanding on March 20, 2000 was
16,932,378 shares.

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding twelve months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [X]  No [ ]

     Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of the registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.  [ ]

                      DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:

     Portions of the Company's Proxy Statement for the 2000 Annual Meeting of
shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          85,819
<SECURITIES>                                     4,453
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               114,371
<PP&E>                                          13,302
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,484
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,578
<BONDS>                                            885
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         2,565
<OTHER-SE>                                     110,642
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,353
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                83,550
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,959
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                21,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 175
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,375
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,432
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,895
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,895
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 7763** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ADELSON MICHEL, a/k/a Mike, a/k/a Cowboy , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Harrisonburg

. Glen E. Conrad , Chief District Judge. ( 5:06

- cr - 00041

- GEC

- 1 )

Submitted : November 22, 2013 Decided: December 3, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Adelson Michel, Appellant Pro Se. Grayson A. Hoffman, Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney s , Ha rrisonburg, Virginia; Joseph W. H. Mott, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES AT TORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Adelson Michel appeals the district court ’s order denying his motion for reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Michel , No. 5:06

-

cr - 00041

- GEC

- 1 (W.D. Va. Oct. 17, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the fac ts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of I-many, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, A. Leigh Powell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Kevin M. Harris, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|       |  |                   |  | 
|------ |  | ----------------- |  | 
|Dated: |  | November 14, 2003 |  | 
|       |  |                   |  | 
|       |  |                   |  | 
|Dated: |  | November 14, 2003 |  | 
|       |  |                   |  | 



A signed original of
this written statement required by section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016007EN.01000204.xml

| 11.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 7/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 7/2

---

Appointment of the First Advocate General

(2016/C 007/05)

At its Meeting on 12 October 2015, the Court of Justice appointed Mr Wathelet as First Advocate General for the period from 12 October 2015 to 6 October 2016.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-6790

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus MELVIN MILTON DESHIELDS, a/k/a Michael Donovan Hayes, a/k/a Chuck, a/k/a Donovan Michael Hayes, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-00-191; CA-03-562-1) Submitted: September 9, 2004 Decided: September 15, 2004 Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Melvin Milton Deshields, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Jane Hairston, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Melvin Milton Deshields seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Deshields that the failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Deshields failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Deshields has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D., Chairman and Interim Chief Executive
Officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Comtex
     News Network, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
     untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
     fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
     circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this report, fairly present in
     all material respects the financial condition, results of
     operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
     periods presented in this report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I are
     responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
     and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 (e) and
     15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
       that material information relating to the registrant, including
       its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
       within those entities, particularly during the period in which
       this report is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
       controls and procedures and presented in this report our
       conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
       and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
       report based on such evaluation; and

     c)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
       internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
       the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially
       affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
       registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have
     disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the
     registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's
     board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
       design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
       which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
       ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
       information; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
       or other employees who have a significant role in the
       registrant's internal control over financial reporting.




Date: February 17, 2004                 /S/ C.W. GILLULY
                                        C.W. Gilluly, Ed.D.
                                         Chairman and Interim
                                         Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>
# C_2015117EN.01000101.xml

| 11.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7519 — Repsol/Talisman Energy)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 117/01)

On 7 April 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7519. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7519. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---