alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# 1 y ~ 

# r.. ~ 

# C.
~ 

# S -__ N h'v1. ~.~4-i~n~ MC - 

### Ir L "

_-____-_ . __-- -_-_--_-_-.-___ _ 

### ~~ 

# --- ._ __-___ 

# ~.~1_~ 

# L ,__-____ -- 

### e2 

# I\J ~ 

# -VV\

- G z., ~ _ -_-_______.__ ____-_ ____ _ __________ ._.__._ _______-_..__ _ _ _- _ ---__- _ -- -



# ~ ' 

# ~ _-- --___ ---_- ~~~~:1~ m -- - - ~ ~~ -_- J~~
. . ~ _ 3. ~ __. -__ __-__ _ _ -
. - ~~ ~



# _ . -~,~ , -- ~ ' ---- ------- - ~~ - -_------__ ------ ~~ ~ '- - - -
""

` ~ ~ --

~ r1 ~ -c_____ ~ • ~- ~~ 

# '''' r

~~~ 

# ------ ~?~'a~ ~~._~~ _y~~ ~~ ~'~%~ ~-~ 

# - -

Li-e LA -000, ---- 

### ~ ` ~ _-- c 

### ~ .. 

### ~ _ - _ . . - - - - - -=-- 

### ~ _ .--- ------.--_------

. 

### ~ 

# L J , _ W --7y---j _79 

### 7

.161



### p `~ ~ ~ h~ ~ ~ .a 

### 114willsov SA<4* , roti-aloe- 4111 5v ~t ~ ~~.~ 

# ! . .

~ 

# G - - ~ . ~ 

# ., .. jliy ~ I V \



### ~c ~ ~ C (D



### ~ c~~ 

## JT7 ~ 

## _ Q ~ 

## c ~ _



# -rf>A 5 

# Z?J

~ 

# . o---- 

# ~ 9
` e . _ -- ~ (~1.~0~ ~ ^ ~' U~~ ' C,Q ~ hok. ~i S~- ~ . o~ 

# CL* oW ~ 

### — L J t-^ A I i - t 

# us

~ _-- - - - ~ ~ - ~~ 

### u 4 19 XI /<-/ S f / Ad' 41 ~ 1

14, h . rlsrt'. CAJ

1 " 

### 1- 4; ~

4 or 0% ILJ 

### c~ 

## ._ —

f ~ 

## , ~ 

## — JD 

### ChA,r I ~ u~ 

### 1'i ~ G~ 

### f .1r1 ~ ~~ C~ Tr



### ~ 

### _ __ _ ~ 

### 1 __ _ ~ ~ 

### r a ;foe C OY)


### ~ 

### -- _ ___.__ 

### ~ ___ _ l 

### ~ --~ ~ ~ ~-

, ~- ~— ~ - .--- 

### ~~ 

## Oa - tLi too 

## ~ sC
~ 

### US 

## E

## PALl o o 

# J-k c I--, Vr

VN.A


### vL- I . .7 --- I I - 

### 01, Q-"nsq-
<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  Daniel  Black,  certify,  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Turbodyne  Technologies,  Inc.  for the year ended
December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the
Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly  presents  in all material respects the
financial  condition  and  results of operations of Turbodyne Technologies, Inc.


                                                    By:        /s/ Daniel  Black
                                                               -----------------
                                                    Name:      DANIEL  BLACK
                                                    Title:     Chief Executive
                                                               Officer
                                                    Date:      April  14,  2003
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-1260

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Frederick Allen McCormick, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 7, 2005 Filed: September 12, 2005

___________ Before MELLOY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Frederick McCormick challenges the sentence imposed by the district court upon his guilty plea to possession of pseudoephedrine for the purpose of manufacturing methamphetamine, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 and 21 U.S.C. § 841(c)(2). In a subsequent motion for remand, and on appeal, he argues under United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), that the district court erred in sentencing him under a sentencing scheme that is no longer valid.
The district court erred in sentencing McCormick under a mandatory Guidelines regime, see Booker , 125 S. Ct. at 756-57, and McCormick sufficiently-2- preserved the issue at sentencing by challenging his sentencing range under Blakely v. Washington , 124 S. Ct. 2531 (2004), see United States v. Pirani , 406 F.3d 543, 549 (8th Cir. 2005) (en banc), petition for cert. filed , (U.S. July 27, 2005) (No. 05-5547). We thus review for harmless error. See United States v. Haidley , 400 F.3d 642, 644- 45 (8th Cir. 2005). The government has the burden to prove that the error was harmless, and must show that the error did not affect McCormick’s substantial rights --i.e., that the district court would have imposed the same sentence under advisory Guidelines. See id.
We are left with “grave doubt” as to whether the error was harmless: McCormick was sentenced at the bottom of the Guidelines range, seeid. at 645 (holding not harmless district court’s error in imposing sentence under mandatory Guidelines regime where court sentenced defendant to bottom of Guidelines range, even if no Sixth Amendment issue was present), and the government has pointed to nothing in the record that shows the district court would have imposed the same sentence under an advisory system. Accordingly, we remand for resentencing, and we deny the pending motion to remand as moot.

_____________________________
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 ROBBIN R. HAROLD,

3 Petitioner-Appellant,

4 v. NO. 34,980

5 JANET DOHERTY,

6 Respondent-Appellee.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY

8 Angie K. Schneider, District Judge 

9 Robbin R. Harold

10 High Rolls, NM 

11 Pro Se Appellant

12 John R. Hakanson

13 Alamogordo, NM 

14 for Appellee

15 MEMORANDUM OPINION

16 VANZI, Judge.

17 {1} Summary affirmance in part and reversal in part was proposed for the reasons

18 stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing
2

1 summary affirmance in part and reversal in part has been filed and the time for doing

2 so has expired.

3 {2} AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part as set forth in the calendar notice.

4 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

5 __________________________________

6 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

7 WE CONCUR:

8 _________________________________

9 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge

10 _________________________________

11 J. MILES HANISEE, Judge
REF ID:A63074 

Mr. ll. P., Conrtth 

tua JTQ:aid.exit 

Vest.e.m '° lb1lon um.mi ftreo~, ~ph 

~ ,& 

~ 

.. 33 

aw 'fora is, ..,,. tork 

... *• Corvi tobt 

• 

I • ft17 clad. ~t JOU Jla to 'be JW'ffOll\ tor \bl 

6-T Apd.l llMtiag ot ue •ti~t BeourltJ Apflc1 &cientitio 

MY110l7 loud, U.p1JW tho &t.b opm tor ln41Y14ual GOD• 

Rltation, 

98 Chief ot t!Mr JfSA aecutr.Y ror Oc:caul:tante hu ....._ ftq'..-a'ted w _.. t!w aeoe•~ ~nta tor 

T(Nr tra.val U4 w totar4 'tblt AHffMr.r .Wrlal 41.nctl,y 

t.o J'OU• 

fM t.vo~ _.,illfi 1• lldhedu.led to opm •t ~100 •·•· 

*l 6 ,Qr'tl bl 'b atatt ~· Roca (lS .. M\) a.t, ~ ~ llclu'itiJ lt&UOD, ~· n, S.. plam:.d W 

prori4e • M!in ol ....-ntattOM W \M loo.1d, lfrS..,.1~ 

ti. ..sen \l..i.l to '61.e • to. -Jo:r J\'lfOble ue&a ot ~ 

~· 

i • looldat tan.r4 w ...,1118 7Q\l at tM .. ti"I• 

fiDc:ettl¥, 

ccat NJ ~ ?7'11 l/~~-

DSC/O 

ISARC (Mr. WUdola1PIRS) 

X/'R I Selt "4Jt;pl&natoey. 

oved for Release b NSA on 06-19-2014 u s ant to E.O. 1 2
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2543 

To require a study on the national security implications of the People’s 

Republic of China’s efforts to create an official digital currency. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 29, 2021 

Mr. HAGERTY (for himself, Mr. WARNER, Ms. LUMMIS, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. 

GRASSLEY, Mr. CRUZ, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. BRAUN, and Mr. 

YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To require a study on the national security implications 

of the People’s Republic of China’s efforts to create 

an official digital currency. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY ON THE CREATION OF AN OFFICIAL 

4 DIGITAL CURRENCY BY THE PEOPLE’S RE5 PUBLIC OF CHINA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than one year after the 

7 date of the enactment of this Act, the President shall sub8 mit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report 

9 on the short-, medium-, and long-term national security 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2543 IS

1 risks associated with the creation and use of the official 

2 digital renminbi of the People’s Republic of China, includ3 ing— 

4 (1) risks arising from potential surveillance of 

5 transactions; 

6 (2) risks related to security and illicit finance; 

7 and 

8 (3) risks related to economic coercion and social 

9 control by the People’s Republic of China. 

10 (b) FORM OF REPORT.—The report required by sub11 section (a) shall be submitted in unclassified form but may 

12 include a classified annex. 

13 (c) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DE14 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate commit15 tees of Congress’’ means— 

16 (1) the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

17 Urban Affairs, the Committee on Foreign Relations, 

18 the Committee on Appropriations, and the Select 

19 Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and 

20 (2) the Committee on Financial Services, the 

21 Committee on Foreign Affairs, the Committee on 

22 Appropriations, and the Permanent Select Com23 mittee on Intelligence of the House of Representa24 tives. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 16, 2021.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 16, 2021

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A21D0386. T-MOBILE SOUTH LLC v. DAVID M. CURRY, IN HIS OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS COMMISSIONER OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2020CV340221
# C_2015341EN.01000301.xml

| 16.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7727 — Colony/AXA/Groupe Data 4)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 341/02)

On 7 October 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes.

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7727. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7727. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Agricultural Research Service

# AGENCY:

Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of intent.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to RENEWABLE NUTRIENTS, LLC. of PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINA, an exclusive license to U.S. Patent No. 8,574,885, “ANAMMOX BACTERIUM ISOLATE,” issued on NOVEMBER 5, 2013.

# DATES:

Comments must be received on or before April 20, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mojdeh Bahar of the Office of Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 301-504-5989.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The Federal Government's patent rights in this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public interest to so license this invention as RENEWABLE NUTRIENTS, LLC. of PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINA has submitted a complete and sufficient application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,

Assistant Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2015-06318 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000353153
<NAME>                        Cairn Energy USA, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                  APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1.00
<CASH>                          3,915
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   4,962
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                9,503
<PP&E>                          224,483
<DEPRECIATION>                  83,106
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  151,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           18,459
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        176
<OTHER-SE>                      93,255
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    151,890
<SALES>                         6,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                6,361
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                5,107
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              933
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             321
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    321
<EPS-PRIMARY>                   .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                   .02
        




</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 29, 2016

No. 04-14-00390-CR

Paul Anthony GARCIA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5398

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 This appeal is on remand from the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. The State filed 

its supplemental brief on remand on October 27, 2016. Appellant’s brief on remand was due 

November 28, 2016. Appellant has filed a motion to extend time to file his brief, asking for an 

additional thirty days. After review, we GRANT appellant’s motion and ORDER appellant to 

file his supplemental brief on remand in this court on or before December 28, 2016. We remind 

appellant that his supplement brief should address the issues in light of the decision rendered by 

the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,





AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Tanir Horn, as Chief Financial Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





Date: March 16, 2012
By:
/s/ Tanir HornTanir HornChief Financial Officer of the Company
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARCELINO ECHEVERRIABARBOZA, Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent. No. 10-71738 Agency No. A079-805-425

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted July 15, 2011 ** Pasadena, California Before: RYMER, TALLMAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges. Appellant Marcelino Echeverria-Barboza petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) order denying him adjustment of status under the 

# FILED

AUG 03 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALSChild Status Protection Act (CSPA), Pub. L. No. 107-208, 116 Stat. 927 (2002). We deny the petition. On July 27, 1992, Echeverria’s father, a lawful permanent resident of the United States, filed an F2A immigrant visa petition on Echeverria’s behalf. See 8 U.S.C. § 1153(a)(2)(A). When his priority date became current on August 1, 1997, Echeverria was older than twenty-one and had thus “aged-out” of the F2A preference category. See 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1) (an F2A beneficiary must be a “child” under age twenty-one). No furthe r petition or application for adjustment of status was filed by Echeverria or his fath er. Echeverria claims he is nonetheless entitled to protection under the CSPA. It is undisputed that Echeverria was over age twenty-one at the time his priority date became current and a visa wa s then available to him. Because he had aged-out of the F2A preference category, he could not claim a visa as an adult beneficiary under his father’s petition. Nor does the CSPA provide Echeverria relief because he sought to adjust status on January 28, 2004, well over one year after his visa number became available on August 1, 1997. See 8 U.S.C. § 1153(h)(1)(A); see also Park v. Mukasey , 514 F.3d 1384 (9th Cir. 2008) (adopting the opinion and order of the district court in Park v. Gonzalez , 450 F. Supp. 2d 1153, 1158, 1163 (D. Or. 2006)). Even if we were inclined to accept Echeverria’s theory that he only needed to adjust status within one year of the CSPA’s date ofenactment, the record shows he neverthele ss failed to do so. He did not apply for adjustment of status until January 28, 2004, roughly a year and a half after the law was enacted on August 6, 2002. For these reasons, there is no legitimate basis for extending CSPA protections to him. Accordingly, his petition is DENIED

.
FINAL RULE TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD): 

ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL AND 

INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT: 

Refrigerated Bottled or Canned Beverage Vending Machines 

August 7, 2009 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Assistant Secretary 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

Building Technologies Program 

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards 

Washington, DC 20585 

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 74
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy 

by staff members of 

Navigant Consulting, Inc., 

and 

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory 

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 74