alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION – Chief Financial Officer**

I, Steve Filton, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Health Services, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 7, 2010
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40420 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus BELFREY BROWN, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No.6:96-CR-22-13

- - - - - - - - - - December 8, 1997 Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Belfrey Brown appeals his conviction and sentence for possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine base, aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court did not clearly err in adopting the factual findings of the PSR in determining the amount of drugs attributable to Brown, since the PSR had sufficient indicia of reliability, and Brown failed to demonstrate that the PSR was unreliable. See United States v.No. 97-40420 -2- Jobe , 101 F.3d 1046, 1065 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v. Valencia , 44 F.3d 269, 274 (5th Cir. 1995). For the same reason, the district court did not err in declining to require laboratory analysis of the substance determined to be “crack” to ensure that it was not cocaine hydrochloride. Id
. Nor was it clear error for the district court to apply § 2D1.1(b)(1) of the guidelines to increase Brown’s offense level by two on the basis of the firearm found in Brown’s closet along with drugs and ammunition. See United States v. Eastland , 989 F.2d 760, 770 (5th Cir. 1993). It is unnecessary to decide whether Solis should have been subpoenaed for the sentencing hearing. Assuming, arguendo , that Solis would have testified as Brown asserts, elimination of the amount of drugs linked to Brown through Solis would not have changed Brown’s base offense level, rendering any error harmless.
See § 2D1.1(c)(2).
AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 219 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 219

To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the amount of 
 certain payments during the emergency period resulting from the COVID-
                  19 pandemic, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2021

 Ms. Cortez Masto introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
           and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to increase the amount of 
 certain payments during the emergency period resulting from the COVID-
                  19 pandemic, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Aid and Attendance Support Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE OF AMOUNT OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 
              PAYMENTS DURING EMERGENCY PERIOD RESULTING FROM COVID-19 
              PANDEMIC.

    (a) In General.--During the covered period, the Secretary of 
Veterans Affairs shall apply each of the following provisions of title 
38, United States Code, by substituting for each of the dollar amounts 
in such provision the amount equal to 125 percent of the dollar amount 
that was in effect under such provision on the day before the date of 
the enactment of this Act:
            (1) Subsections (l), (m), (r), and (t) of section 1114.
            (2) Paragraph (1)(E) of section 1115.
            (3) Subsection (c) of section 1311.
            (4) Subsection (g) of section 1315.
            (5) Paragraphs (1) and (2) of subsection (d) of section 
        1521.
            (6) Paragraphs (2) and (4) of subsection (f) of section 
        1521.
    (b) Treatment of Amounts.--Any amount payable to an individual 
under subsection (a) in excess of the amount otherwise in effect shall 
be in addition to any other benefit or any other amount payable to that 
individual under any provision of law referred to in subsection (a) or 
any other provision of law administered by the Secretary of Veterans 
Affairs.
    (c) Covered Period.--In this section, the covered period is the 
period that begins on the date of the enactment of this Act and ends 60 
days after the last day of the emergency period (as defined in section 
1135(g)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-5(g)(1))) 
resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2424 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2424

 To make available $250,000,000 from the Travel Promotion Fund for the 
                   Corporation for Travel Promotion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2021

  Ms. Klobuchar (for herself and Mr. Blunt) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make available $250,000,000 from the Travel Promotion Fund for the 
                   Corporation for Travel Promotion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Restoring Brand USA Act''.

SEC. 2. AVAILABILITY OF TRAVEL PROMOTION FUND FOR BRAND USA.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury, subject to 
subsection (b), and notwithstanding any other provision of law, shall 
make available, from unobligated balances remaining available from fees 
collected before October 1, 2020, and credited to Travel Promotion Fund 
established under subsection (d) of the Travel Promotion Act of 2009 
(22 U.S.C. 2131(d)), $250,000,000 for the Corporation for Travel 
Promotion (commonly known as ``Brand USA''). Such amounts shall remain 
available until expended.
    (b) Inapplicability of Certain Requirements and Limitations.--The 
limitations and requirements set forth in paragraphs (2)(B) and (3) of 
subsection (d) of such Act shall not apply to amounts made available 
under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 22, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00706-CR

ROBERT ERWIN JACKSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F15-56643-I

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was due September 16, 2016. After we notified appellant by postcard, a 

motion to extend time was filed and the time was extended to November 8, 2016. To date, 

appellant’s brief has not been filed.

Therefore, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why 

appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings 

and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
PACINO D. NEELY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3575

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark Hulsey, Judge.

Pacino D. Neely, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2014163EN.01000301.xml

| 28.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7204 — Rothesay Life/MetLife Assurance)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 163/02)

On 29 April 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7204. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7204. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14390-14391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06270]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special 
Emphasis Panel, March 31, 2015, 04:00 p.m. to April 01, 2015, 05:00 
p.m., Churchill Hotel, 1914 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washington, DC, 
20009 which was published in the Federal Register on March 09, 2015, 80 
FR 12494.
    The meeting is being amended to reflect location change. The new 
meeting location is the Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro 
Center, Bethesda, MD 20814. The meeting is closed to the public.


[[Page 14391]]


    Dated: March 13, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-06270 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             687
<SECURITIES>                                     5,350
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,649
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,380
<INVENTORY>                                      8,403
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                27,100
<PP&E>                                           6,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,297
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  34,779
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           476
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,371
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    34,779
<SALES>                                         32,434
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                43,635
<CGS>                                           14,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   22,063
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                27,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5,902)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        66
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.63)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### The City of Platteville, Respondent, vs. Hooper and another, imp., Appellants.

*May 4*

June *11, 1885.*

*Town of Platteville v. Hooper, ante,*p. 381, followed.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Qrcunt*County.

For the appellants there was a brief by *Courier <& Clea/ry,*and oral argument by *Mr. Carrier.*

*A. W.*Bell, for the respondent.

Lyolt, J.

This action is upon the same bond for a breach of the conditions of which the action of the *Town of Platteville v. Hooper, ante,*p. 381, was brought, and the *386complaint herein is demurred to on the same grounds. The plaintiff city is situated within the limits of the town of Platteville. By the provisions of the city charter, city taxes are collected by the treasurer of the town of Platteville, the same as town taxes are collected, and when collected are to be paid over by him to the city treasurer. In case of default in such payment, the charter gives to the city a right of action against such town treasurer and his sureties. Laws of 1880, ch. 83, subch. 10, secs. 3-10.

We hold in the other case that the town could maintain an action upon such bond. Eor the reasons stated in the opinion in that case it must be held that the city may maintain this action. The circuit court properly overruled the demurrer.

*By the*Court.— Order affirmed.
# EXHIBIT 99.3

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Barry Zwarenstein, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Barry Zwarenstein

Barry Zwarenstein
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2195 

To prohibit the indefinite detention of persons by the United States and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2015 

Mr. PAUL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To prohibit the indefinite detention of persons by the United 

States and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Sixth Amendment 

5 Preservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON THE INDEFINITE DETENTION OF 

7 PERSONS BY THE UNITED STATES. 

8 (a) LIMITATION ON DETENTION.—Section 4001 of 

9 title 18, United States Code, is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2195 IS

1 (1) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(a) No person shall be imprisoned or otherwise de4 tained by the United States except consistent with the 

5 Constitution.’’; 

6 (2) by redesignating subsection (b) as sub7 section (c); and 

8 (3) by inserting after subsection (a) the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(b)(1) A general authorization to use military force, 

11 a declaration of war, or any similar authority, on its own, 

12 shall not be construed to authorize the imprisonment or 

13 detention without charge or trial of a person apprehended 

14 in the United States. 

15 ‘‘(2) Paragraph (1) applies to an authorization to use 

16 military force, a declaration of war, or any similar author17 ity enacted before, on, or after the date of the enactment 

18 of the Sixth Amendment Preservation Act. 

19 ‘‘(3) This section shall not be construed to authorize 

20 the imprisonment or detention of any person who is appre21 hended in the United States.’’. 

22 (b) REPEAL OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES

23 OF THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS

24 PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILI25 TARY FORCE.—Section 1021 of the National Defense AuVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:48 Oct 23, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2195.IS S2195

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2195 IS

1 thorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 (Public Law 112– 

2 81; 10 U.S.C. 801 note) is repealed. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000352956
<NAME> FAFCO, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          168600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2745600
<ALLOWANCES>                                    607600
<INVENTORY>                                    1167300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3928200
<PP&E>                                         3134300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2349400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 5309200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1927400
<BONDS>                                          19900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        412800
<OTHER-SE>                                     2949100
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   5309200
<SALES>                                        8713700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8761600
<CGS>                                          5108200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5108200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 45200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               73600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 646000
<INCOME-TAX>                                    170500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             475500
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    475500
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .011


</TABLE>