alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1036 

CA 16-01066 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND CURRAN, JJ. 

 

RENEE WANTUCK, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENT AND 

NATURAL GUARDIAN OF TYLER BOCHENSKI, AN INFANT, 

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CITY OF BUFFALO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

 

LAW OFFICES OF JAMES MORRIS, BUFFALO (JACLYN F. SILVER OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. 

TIMOTHY A. BALL, CORPORATION COUNSEL, BUFFALO (DAVID M. LEE OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Shirley

Troutman, J.), entered September 3, 2015. The order granted the

motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff, individually and as parent and natural

guardian of her son, commenced this negligence action seeking damages

for injuries sustained by her son when he struck a trash receptacle

located on a sidewalk after he lost control and fell off of a bicycle

that he had been riding on the street. We conclude that Supreme Court

properly granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing

the complaint. Defendant met its initial burden of establishing as a

matter of law that the trash receptacle constituted an “open and

obvious” condition, and that it was not “inherently dangerous”

(Jordan-Parker v City of Buffalo, 137 AD3d 1751, 1752; see Jones v

City of New York, 32 AD3d 706, 706-707), and plaintiff failed to raise

a triable issue of fact (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York,

49 NY2d 557, 562).

Entered: November 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# C_2014234EN.01000401.xml

| 19.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 234/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 234/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 July 2014

2014/C 234/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3525 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,07 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4570 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79155 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2282 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2144 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3575 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,433 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,05 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1476 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4394 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8750 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4407 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4533 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4835 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5580 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6789 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 392,53 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4211 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3971 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6160 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 716,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3032 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,792 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,4000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,463 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0228 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5189 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,6099 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3525

JPY

Japanese yen

137,07

DKK

Danish krone

7,4570

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79155

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2282

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2144

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3575

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,433

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,05

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1476

RON

Romanian leu

4,4394

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8750

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4407

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4533

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4835

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5580

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6789

KRW

South Korean won

1 392,53

ZAR

South African rand

14,4211

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3971

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6160

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 716,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3032

PHP

Philippine peso

58,792

RUB

Russian rouble

47,4000

THB

Thai baht

43,463

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0228

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5189

INR

Indian rupee

81,6099

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 2, 2018 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-17-01397-CV RICHARD J. BACON, Appellant V. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00603-E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright, J ustice Evans, and Justice Brown Opinion by Chief Justice Wright Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue. 1 By letter dated February 23, 2018, we notified appellant the brief received by the Court on February 6, 2018 w as deficient. We noted the numerous ways in which appellant’s brief did not comply with ru le 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because neither the clerk’s record nor th e reporter’s record had yet been filed, we also informed appellant that his amende d brief comply ing with rule 38 wa s not due until thirty days after the record had been filed. To date, appellan t has not filed an amended brief, filed an extension motion, nor otherwi se corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

1 Appellant filed a docketing stat ement on February 6, 2018, ind icating he had not requested a reporter’s record. Therefore, t he deadline for filing appellant’s brief was thirty days after the clerk’s reco rd was filed.–2– Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

171397F.P05 /Carolyn Wright/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
RICHARD J. BACON, Appellant
No. 05-17-01397-CV V. NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00603-E. Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. Justices Evans and Brown participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this app eal is DISMISSED

.

Judgment entered July 2, 2018
# C_2014344EN.01000101.xml

| 2.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7304 — Danone/ID Logistics/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 344/01

On 24 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7304. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7304. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000736

18-NOV-2016

08:18 AM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

910 

TP 16-00103 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF SAMUEL WALTON, PETITIONER, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOHN COLVIN, SUPERINTENDENT, FIVE POINTS 

CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND ANTHONY ANNUCCI, 

ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT 

OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, 

RESPONDENTS. 

 

SAMUEL WALTON, PETITIONER PRO SE. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (MARCUS J. MASTRACCO OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENTS. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Seneca County [Dennis F.

Bender, A.J.], entered January 19, 2016) to review a determination

finding after a tier II hearing that petitioner had violated two

inmate rules. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the determination is unanimously

confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed. 

Memorandum: Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding

seeking to annul the determination, following a tier II disciplinary

hearing, that he violated two inmate rules. We reject petitioner’s

contention that the determination is not supported by substantial

evidence. Specifically, the misbehavior report, together with the

videotape of the incident and the hearing testimony of the correction

officer who prepared the misbehavior report, “constitutes substantial

evidence supporting the determination that petitioner violated [the]

inmate rule[s]” at issue (Matter of Oliver v Fischer, 82 AD3d 1648,

1648). Petitioner’s denials of the reported misbehavior presented

only an issue of credibility for resolution by the Hearing Officer

(see Matter of Foster v Coughlin, 76 NY2d 964, 966).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06323]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
RENEWABLE NUTRIENTS, LLC. of PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINA, an exclusive 
license to U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 13/164,363, ``SYSTEMS AND 
METHODS FOR REDUCING AMMONIA EMISSIONS FROM LIQUID EFFLUENTS AND FOR 
RECOVERING THE AMMONIA,'' filed on JUNE 20, 2011.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mojdeh Bahar of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as RENEWABLE NUTRIENTS, LLC. of 
PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINA has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-06323 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
EXHIBIT 23.1



INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
         Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-38754) and Forms S-8 (No. 33-88268, No.
         33-73944, No. 333-18877, No. 33-95256 and No. 33-97250) of Uniroyal
         Technology Corporation of our reports dated December 21, 2001, (which
         reports are unqualified and include or refer to an explanatory
         paragraph related to the Company's ability to continue as a going
         concern) appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Uniroyal
         Technology Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2001.







         DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


         Tampa, Florida
         December 27, 2001
# C_2014306EN.01000201.xml

| 10.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 September 2014

2014/C 306/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2902 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,90 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4450 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1708 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2060 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1715 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,678 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 316,84 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2030 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4205 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8371 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3903 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4163 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,9996 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5580 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6268 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 335,06 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0941 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9177 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6153 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 220,97 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1200 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,460 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,8535 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,428 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9374 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0106 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,1926 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2902

JPY

Japanese yen

136,90

DKK

Danish krone

7,4450

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80050

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1708

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2060

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1715

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,678

HUF

Hungarian forint

316,84

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2030

RON

Romanian leu

4,4205

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8371

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3903

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4163

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,9996

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5580

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6268

KRW

South Korean won

1 335,06

ZAR

South African rand

14,0941

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9177

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6153

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 220,97

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1200

PHP

Philippine peso

56,460

RUB

Russian rouble

47,8535

THB

Thai baht

41,428

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9374

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0106

INR

Indian rupee

78,1926

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
EXHIBIT 10.1

 

REIT Management Corp.

60 Cutter Mill Road

Suite 303

Great Neck, NY  11021

 

 

June 2, 2011

 

BRT Realty Trust

60 Cutter Mill Road

Suite 303

Great Neck, NY  11021

 

BRT Torch Member, LLC

60 Cutter Mill Road

Suite 303

Great Neck, NY  11021

 

RE:          Limited Liability Company Agreement of BRTL LLC

dated as of June 2, 2011 by and among BRTL LLC,

Debt Opportunity Fund III, LLC and

BRT Torch Member LLC (the “Agreement”)

 

Gentlemen:

 

For valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, we hereby agree to indemnify and hold each of you harmless for amounts that you pay on our behalf pursuant to Section 7.06 and/or Section 9.13 of the Agreement.  We further agree that any sums owed which we fail to promptly remit to you may be offset by any future sums due to REIT by BRT

 

	
Very truly yours,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
REIT Management Corp.
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   David W. Kalish
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
David   W. Kalish, Senior Vice President
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Agreed and accepted by
    	
 
    
	
BRT Realty Trust
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Mark H. Lundy
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Mark   H. Lundy, Senior Vice President
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
BRT   Torch Member, LLC
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
By:
    	
/s/   Mark H. Lundy
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
Mark   H. Lundy, Senior Vice President
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of BCT International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q of the period ended August 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Michael R. Hull, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Michael R. Hull

Michael R. Hull

Chief Financial Officer

October 15, 2003



14
From: Tokyo. 

To : Washington 19 Nove:mber 1941 

(J'l9) 

Circular #2354 

5tr1ctlJ Beerete 

REF ID:A487729 

RETRANSLATION 26 Sept. 44. 

In the event that our side's foreign relations are about to roll up to the shores of calamity, will 

you note that we v1ll insert 5 times at the beginning and end 

ot General News Broadcasts the following words: 

(l) In case Japanese-American relations 

become mortally strained ( /\/'. ., '. c~? HIGASHI J . ---~ '·-........ -. 

(2) In the case of Japanese Soviet relations, 

KITA; 

(3) Japanese-British relations (including their implie&tions in Thai together with 

Malaya and the Netherlands East Indies), 

NISHI. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10195

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NATHAN BRYANT COOPER,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-151-27

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Nathan Bryant Cooper has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Cooper has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently 

developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Cooper’s claims of ineffective 

assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 10, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10195 Document: 00513755386 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2016
No. 16-10195

2

prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 

(5th Cir. 2014).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Cooper’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-10195 Document: 00513755386 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/10/2016
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0462. PHILLIP NATHAN KERCH v. THE STATE.

Phillip Nathan Kerch pled guilty to multiple offenses, including malice murder

and felony murder, and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Subsequently, Kerch

filed a motion to correct void sentence. The trial court denied the motion, and Kerch

filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

In State v. Murray, 286 Ga. 258 (687 SE2d 790) (2009), the Supreme Court

held that “[i]f the underlying action is a murder case, this Court hasjurisdiction of the

appeal, regardless of whether the order being appealed is based on facts having some

bearing on the underlying criminal trial.” Id. at 259 (1); see also Neal v. State, 290

Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012) (Hunstein, J., concurring). Accordingly, this

appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/07/2016

November 07, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         2,039,003
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  26,858,785
<ALLOWANCES>                                   6,202,049
<INVENTORY>                                    1,659,382
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               28,715,178
<PP&E>                                         25,215,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                 11,115,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 54,194,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          24,906,783
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       21,349,069
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,787,655)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   54,194,175
<SALES>                                        53,077,672
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               53,077,672
<CGS>                                          34,913,080
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  52,052,803
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             831,082
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                193,787
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (343,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            536,787
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   536,787
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
        


</TABLE>