alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Unigene Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Warren
P. Levy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Warren P. Levy     
|Warren P. Levy         
|Chief Executive Officer
|November 21, 2005      



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6440** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. ROBERT RONALD GIBSON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News
. Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 4:06

- cr - 00146

- RGD

- TEM

- 2 ; 4:14

- cv - 00150

- RGD )

Submitted : June 18 , 2015 Decided: June 23, 2015

Before SHEDD , DUNCAN , and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Robert Ronald Gibson , Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Newport News, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert Ro nald Gibson seeks to appeal the district court ’s orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner sati sfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 ( 2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U .S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and lega l contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-40878

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HIGINIO HERNANDEZ, also known as Gino,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:08-CR-177-1

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Higinio Hernandez has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez has filed a response. Our independent review

of the record, counsel’s brief, and Hernandez’s response discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

December 8, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-40878 Document: 00511315779 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.4


                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
NWE Capital (Cyprus) Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated March 30, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of NWE Capital (Cyprus) Ltd. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 of PLD
Telekom Inc.

Our report dated March 30, 1999 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company's parent, PLD Telekom Inc. (PLD) does not presently have
sufficient funds on hand to meet its current debt obligations. PLD's failure to
make payment in full when required could result in a cross-default under and
acceleration of other debt obligations for which the Company is a guarantor.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.


                                        KPMG

St. Petersburg, Russia
March 30, 1999
# C_2015142EN.01002301.xml

| 29.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/23

---

Special Report No 4/2015 ‘Technical assistance: what contribution has it made to agriculture and rural development?’

(2015/C 142/11)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 4/2015 ‘Technical assistance: what contribution has it made to agriculture and rural development?’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
# C_2014350EN.01000101.xml

| 4.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 350/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 350/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7364 — Blackstone/Lombard)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 350/01)

On 26 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7364. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7364. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 10.3

July 27, 2009

David W.
Froesel, Jr.
100 E. RiverCenter Blvd.
Suite 1600
Covington, KY 41011

Re:     
Temporary Salary Reduction Program

Dear David:

As
you know, Omnicare is implementing a temporary salary reduction program. During
the period of Omnicares temporary salary reduction program, your regular base
salary will be reduced by five percent (5%) from its current level. This
reduction in your regular base salary will become effective as of July 16,
2009.

The
salary reduction does not constitute a breach of, or a failure by Omnicare or
any of its affiliates to observe or perform any of their obligations under,
your employment agreement with Omnicare, dated February 17, 1996 (the
Employment Agreement) or any other agreement you may have with Omnicare or
any of its affiliates. The salary reduction will have no effect on the validity
or enforceability of any provision of the Employment Agreement or any other
agreement that you may have with Omnicare or any of its affiliates.
Notwithstanding anything in this letter to the contrary, for purposes of
determining (i) the severance payable pursuant to Section 3.4 or 3.5 of the
Employment Agreement, (ii) the amount of compensation under the Rabbi Trust
for Deferred Compensation Arrangements and the Excess Savings Benefit portion
of the Excess Benefit Plan and (iii) your benefits under any other employee
benefit plan of Omnicare or any of its affiliates, your base salary shall be
determined without application of the salary reduction set forth above.

Nothing
in this letter constitutes an admission by Omnicare or any of its affiliates
that your consent is required to reduce your regular base salary under the
terms of the Employment Agreement or otherwise. If and to the extent necessary,
however, this letter modifies the Employment Agreement to reflect the foregoing
temporary salary reduction.

---



Please
execute and return this letter to show your acknowledgment of and agreement to
the foregoing. We appreciate your efforts on behalf of Omnicare.

| |                    
| | -------------------
| | Sincerely,         
| |                    
| | /s/ Mark G. Kobasuk
| |                    
| | Mark G. Kobasuk    

Agreed and
accepted:

/s/ David W.
Froesel, Jr.
Employee
Printed Name: David W. Froesel, Jr.
Date: July 27, 2009

---
# C_2014160EN.01000101.xml

| 27.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 160/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 160/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7162 — INEOS / SSG Solvents Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 160/01)

On 5 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7162. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7162. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015064EN.01000901.xml

| 21.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 64/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 64/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 February 2015

(2015/C 64/05)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1298 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,91 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4612 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73480 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,5213 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0718 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,5930 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,508 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,68 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1812 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4568 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7835 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4399 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4073 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7635 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4960 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5360 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 254,90 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1681 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0642 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,7125 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 510,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1221 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,016 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,2000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,777 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2432 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9572 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,3122 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1298

JPY

Japanese yen

133,91

DKK

Danish krone

7,4612

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73480

SEK

Swedish krona

9,5213

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0718

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,5930

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,508

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,68

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1812

RON

Romanian leu

4,4568

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7835

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4399

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4073

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7635

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4960

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5360

KRW

South Korean won

1 254,90

ZAR

South African rand

13,1681

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0642

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,7125

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 510,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1221

PHP

Philippine peso

50,016

RUB

Russian rouble

70,2000

THB

Thai baht

36,777

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2432

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9572

INR

Indian rupee

70,3122

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,163
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    126,422
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          28,066
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            28,089
<LOANS>                                        162,651
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,161
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,996
<DEPOSITS>                                     294,609
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,367
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,951
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,476
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,593
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 340,996
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,520
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                4,121
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   280
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                12,922
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,496
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,514
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,407
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,271
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,310
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,310
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.88
<LOANS-NON>                                        974
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,559
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   366
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,407
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,279
<RECOVERIES>                                       433
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,161
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,316
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            845


</TABLE>
# C_2014325EN.01000102.xml

| 19.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 325/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 325/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7377 — Centerbridge/Apcoa)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 325/02

On 12 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7377. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7377. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015008EN.01000102.xml

| 13.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 8/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7471 — SHV/Nutreco)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 8/02)

On 18 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7471. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7471. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 22 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 22

   To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 
           Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 2021

  Ms. Lummis (for herself and Mr. Barrasso) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 
           Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEVILS TOWER.

    (a) In General.--The mountain at the Devils Tower National 
Monument, Wyoming, located at 4435'26"N, by 10442'55"W, and the area 
located at 4435'21"N, by 10441'48"W, shall be known and designated as 
``Devils Tower''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, order, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the mountain 
and area described in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to ``Devils Tower''.
                                 <all>
```