alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014232EN.01000101.xml

| 18.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7289 — Golden Agri-Resources/CEPSA Quimica/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 232/01

On 9 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7289. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7289. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2161 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2161

  To modify the restriction in section 3326 of title 5, United States 
   Code, relating to the appointment of retired members of the Armed 
Forces to positions in the Department of Defense to apply to positions 
                      at or above the GS-14 level.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2021

    Mr. Lankford (for himself, Ms. Sinema, Mr. Lee, and Mr. Romney) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                      Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the restriction in section 3326 of title 5, United States 
   Code, relating to the appointment of retired members of the Armed 
Forces to positions in the Department of Defense to apply to positions 
                      at or above the GS-14 level.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Retain Skilled Veterans Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON APPOINTMENT OF RETIRED MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 
              FORCES TO CERTAIN POSITIONS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE.

    (a) In General.--Section 3326 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in the section heading, by inserting ``certain'' before 
        ``positions''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking ``appointed'' and all that follows 
                through ``Defense'' and inserting ``appointed to a 
                position in the excepted or competitive service 
                classified at or above GS-14 of the General Schedule 
                (or equivalent) in or under the Department of 
                Defense''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (1), by striking ``for the 
                purpose'' and all that follows through ``Management''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
subchapter I of chapter 33 of such title is amended in the item 
relating to section 3326 by inserting ``certain'' before ``positions''.
                                 <all>
```
November 22, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JACK N. MCCRARY AND SUZANNE F. MCCRARY, Appellants

NO. 14-15-00550-CV V.

WILLIAM A. HIGHTOWER, UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., B.B. 

TULEY, BRIAN DAVIDSON D/B/A PANORAMIC INVESTIGATIONS, 

Appellees

________________________________

This court today issued a substitute opinion. We order this court’s former 

judgment of August 11, 2016, vacated, set aside, and annulled. We further order this 

court’s opinion of August 11, 2016, withdrawn. This cause, an appeal from the 

judgment in favor of appellees, William A. Hightower, UBS Financial Services, 

Inc., B.B. Tuley, and Brian Davidson d/b/a Panoramic Investigations, signed June 

17, 2015, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have inspected the record

and find the trial court erred in rendering summary judgment in favor of appellees 

William A. Hightower and B.B. Tuley. We therefore order that the portions of the 

judgment that grant summary judgment to William A. Hightower and B.B. Tuley 

are REVERSED and ordered severed and REMANDED for proceedings in 

accordance with the court’s opinion.

Further, we find no error in the remainder of the judgment rendering 

summary judgment in favor of appellees UBS Financial Services, Inc., and Brian 

Davidson d/b/a Panoramic Investigations and order it AFFIRMED. 

We order each party to pay its costs incurred by reason of this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHERYL M. FEALY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-16972

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-02340-APGPAL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges. 

Cheryl M. Fealy appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment 

in her action alleging federal and state law claims arising from Wells Fargo’s

turnover of money from Fealy’s bank account to the Internal Revenue Service 

(“IRS”) pursuant to a notice of levy. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-16972 

We review de novo. Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th 

Cir. 2004). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Wells 

Fargo’s compliance with the IRS notice of levy immunized it from suit. See 26 

U.S.C. § 6332(a), (e); see also Stead v. United States, 419 F.3d 944, 947 (9th Cir. 

2005) (stating that a third party has only two defenses for not turning over levied 

funds to the IRS). Contrary to Fealy’s contention, the district court did not err in 

granting summary judgment for Wells Fargo notwithstanding Wells Fargo’s failure 

to file a separate motion for summary judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f).

The district court did not abuse its discretion by setting aside the entry of 

default against Wells Fargo. See O’Connor v. Nevada, 27 F.3d 357, 364 (9th Cir. 

1994) (setting forth standard of review).

We do not consider arguments that were not presented to the district court. 

See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 85 (Friday, May 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25169-25170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10122]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8714]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Wifredo Lam: Imagining New Worlds'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be

[[Page 25170]]

included in the exhibition ``Wifredo Lam: Imagining New Worlds,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the McMullen Museum 
of Art, Boston College, Boston, MA, from on or about September 1, 2014, 
until on or about January 2, 2015, the High Museum of Art, Atlanta, GA, 
from on or about February 14, 2015, until on or about May 24, 2015, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: April 22, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-10122 Filed 5-1-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-20555

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE WILLIAM QUINTANILLA, also known as Pablo, also known as Ronko,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:14-CR-497-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose William Quintanilla appeals following his guilty-plea conviction for 

conspiring in the sex trafficking of children by force and coercion in violation 

of 18 U.S.C. § 1594(c). He argues that the district court’s refusal to hear his 

testimony at the sentencing hearing violated the Due Process Clause, Federal 

Rule of Criminal Procedure 32, U.S.S.G. § 6A1.3(a), and this court’s precedents.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-20555 Document: 00514209720 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2017
No. 16-20555

2

Quintanilla entered his plea in accordance with a written plea 

agreement wherein he waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence, 

except with the respect to his right to appeal a claim of ineffective assistance 

of counsel. The Government seeks to enforce the waiver. Our review whether 

the waiver provision bars the instant appeal is de novo. United States v. 

Jacobs, 635 F.3d 778, 780-81 (5th Cir. 2011). We construe the plea agreement 

“like a contract, seeking to determine the defendant’s reasonable 

understanding of the agreement and construing any ambiguity against the 

Government.” United States v. Farias, 469 F.3d 393, 397 (5th Cir. 2006) 

(footnote omitted). 

We need not reach whether the waiver encompasses Quintanilla’s 

challenge to the conduct of the sentencing hearing. Rather, our review of the 

record satisfies us that the district court did not abuse its discretion in 

declining to hear testimony. See United States v. Jackson, 453 F.3d 302, 305 

(5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Henderson, 19 F.3d 917, 927 (5th Cir. 1994). 

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-20555 Document: 00514209720 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2017
# C_2014240EN.01001101.xml

| 24.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 240/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 240/11

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7169 — Weichai Power/KION Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 240/02

On 15 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7169. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7169. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014180EN.01000202.xml

| 13.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 180/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 180/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7203 — Unibail-Rodamco/CPPIB/CentrO)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 180/03)

On 6 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7203. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7203. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Department of the Navy

# AGENCY:

Department of the Navy, DOD.

# ACTION:

Special notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant an exclusive license to Vivinostics LLC of Gainesville, FL. The proposed license is a revocable, nonassignable, exclusive license to practice the inventions embodied in U.S. Pat. No. 7,128,714: NON-CONTACT WAVEFORM MONITOR; U.S. Pat. No. 8,177,721: REMOTE BLOOD PRESSURE WAVEFORM SENSING METHOD; and, U.S. Pat. No. 8,444,568 REMOTE BLOOD PRESSURE WAVEFORM SENSING METHOD throughout the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and all other United States territories and possessions. The Secretary of the Navy has an ownership interest in these inventions.

# DATES:

Anyone wishing to object to the grant of this license must file written objections along with supporting evidence, if any, not later than April 1, 2015.

# ADDRESSES:

Written objections are to be filed with the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport, 1176 Howell St., Bldg 102T, Code 00T2, Newport, RI 02841.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dr. Theresa A. Baus, Head, Technology Partnerships Office, Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division, Newport, 1176 Howell St., Bldg 102T, Code 00T2, Newport, RI 02841, telephone 401-832-8728, or E-Mail                         *Theresa.baus@navy.mil.*

Authority:35 U.S.C. 207, 37 CFR part 404.

Dated: March 11, 2015.

N.A. Hagerty-Ford,

Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-06101 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
OFFICE OF 

THE SUPER I NT EN DENT 

COAST GUARD ACADEMY 

TREASURY DEPARTMENT 

UNITED STATES COAST GUARD 

NEW LONDON, CONN. 

22 December, 1927. 

Major William F. Friedman. U.S.A • . 3416 llunitions Building, 

Office of the Chief Signal Officer, 

War Department, ~ Was~ington, D. O. 

MY Dear Major: 

Your letter inolosing your expense account 

reached me this morning upon my return from a duck hunting 

trip, and I am inclosing a check in the sum of $23.10 to cover 

your expenses upon your recent trip to the AC.ADEMY. 

we all very muoh enjoyed your lecture and 

appreciate your courtesy in coming. 

I trust that I may have the pleasure of seeing 

you again in the near future. 

Very sincerely yours, 

HDH/JAH 

JJ.IS";J~ 

H. D. Hinc~ey, - .l 

Commander, ......
# CA2014391EN.01000901.xml

| 6.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 391/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 391/9

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 391 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 293 | (NL) |
| 295 | (MT) |
| 297 | |
| 299 | |
| 304 | |
| 321 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 325 | (SL) |
| 332 | |
| 334 | |
| 340 | |
| 342 | (EN) |
| 352 | |
| 354 | |
| 358 | |
| 366 | |
| 376 | |
| 378 | (SV) |
| 381 | |
| 384 | |
| 385 | (PT) |
| 390 | (HR) |
| 391 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

293

(NL)

295

(MT)

297

299

304

321

(DE/EN/FR)

325

(SL)

332

334

340

342

(EN)

352

354

358

366

376

378

(SV)

381

384

385

(PT)

390

(HR)

391

---
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2438 

To modify the boundary of the Cane River Creole National Historical Park 

in the State of Louisiana, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 22, 2021 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To modify the boundary of the Cane River Creole National 

Historical Park in the State of Louisiana, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cane River Creole Na5 tional Historical Park Boundary Modification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CANE RIVER CREOLE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK 

7 BOUNDARY MODIFICATION. 

8 Section 303(b) of the Cane River Creole National 

9 Historical Park and National Heritage Area Act (16 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2438 IS

1 U.S.C. 410ccc–1(b)) is amended by adding at the end the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(5) The approximately 46.1 acres of land de4 picted as tracts 1, 2, and 3 on the map entitled ‘A 

5 Map of Lands in Sections 111, 112 & 113, T7N– 

6 R6W’ and dated May 20, 2021 (referred to in this 

7 paragraph as the ‘Map’), subject to the requirement 

8 that, as soon as practicable after the date of enact9 ment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall prepare 

10 a map of the tracts consistent with National Park 

11 Service standards to replace the Map.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
Veolia waste analysis issues

Todd Ramaly Todd Ramaly to: David Ogulei 04/10/2012 05:10 PM

Cc: Christopher Lambesis

History: This message has been replied to.

This is our recommended response to comments for the state. Many of the responses elaborate on 

the special mercury conditions that address WAP concepts in the permit. RTC040809.PDF

This is not the final (but virtually so) memo recommending Hg conditions for the state's permit. 

Mercury feed memo 11-16-07 ssent.doc

This is the document identifying issues with Veolla's WAP. 

Review of Veolia WAP-11-08-07.pdf

This is Veolia's updated 2007 RCRA WAP: WASTE ANALYSIS PLAN.doc

This is Veolia's response to EPA's critique of the RCRA WAP: EPA WAP Issues.doc

David - Call me with any questions.

Good Luck,

Todd D. Ramaly

Environmental Scientist

RCRA Programs Section

U.S. EPA - Region 5

(312) 353-9317