alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                           14,265
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   373,006
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4,662
<INVENTORY>                                     192,841
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                631,725
<PP&E>                                          114,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                   52,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  736,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           701,664
<BONDS>                                          53,239
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              3
<OTHER-SE>                                      (19,148)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    736,419
<SALES>                                       2,006,161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,456,632
<CGS>                                         1,800,085 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 2,141,697 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                259,712
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               36,663
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  18,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                        417
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              18,143
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     18,143
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       .53
        



</TABLE>
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00321-CV

Vets Securing America, Inc.

v.

Edward Smith

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2020CCV-60872-2

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are adjudged against 

appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

January 13, 2022
EXHIBIT 32.1
SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS
     In connection with the Annual Report of Glen Burnie Bancorp (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification isan exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand result of operations of the Company for the periodsreflected therein.    Date: March 26, 2004  /s/ F. William Kuethe, Jr.   F. William Kuethe, Jr. President, Chief Executive Officer      /s/ John E. Porter   John E.PorterChief Financial Officer
# C_2014186EN.01000701.xml

| 18.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 June 2014

2014/C 186/07

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3568 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,40 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4563 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79940 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0058 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2188 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1300 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,445 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,34 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1371 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4015 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8972 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4492 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4742 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5174 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5651 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6982 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 386,98 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5637 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4491 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5770 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 137,22 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3738 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,663 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,1895 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,020 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0322 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6906 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,5844 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3568

JPY

Japanese yen

138,40

DKK

Danish krone

7,4563

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79940

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0058

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2188

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1300

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,445

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,34

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1371

RON

Romanian leu

4,4015

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8972

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4492

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4742

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5174

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5651

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6982

KRW

South Korean won

1 386,98

ZAR

South African rand

14,5637

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4491

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5770

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 137,22

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3738

PHP

Philippine peso

59,663

RUB

Russian rouble

47,1895

THB

Thai baht

44,020

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0322

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6906

INR

Indian rupee

81,5844

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2159 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2159

To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 400 College Drive, Middleburg, Florida, as 
the ``Andrew K. Baker Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic'', and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2021

    Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Scott of Florida) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the community-based outpatient clinic of the Department of 
Veterans Affairs located at 400 College Drive, Middleburg, Florida, as 
the ``Andrew K. Baker Department of Veterans Affairs Clinic'', and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ANDREW K. BAKER DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS CLINIC.

    (a) Designation.--The community-based outpatient clinic of the 
Department of Veterans Affairs located at 400 College Drive, 
Middleburg, Florida, shall after the date of the enactment of this Act 
be known and designated as the ``Andrew K. Baker Department of Veterans 
Affairs Clinic'' or the ``A.K. Baker VA Clinic''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the community-
based outpatient clinic referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
considered to be a reference to the Andrew K. Baker Department of 
Veterans Affairs Clinic.
                                 <all>
```
CHARLES W. JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0200

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Taylor County.

Gregory S. Parker, Judge.

Charles W. Jackson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael McDermott, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
               CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Famous Dave's of
America, Inc. does hereby certify that:

                  a)       the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Famous Dave's of
                           America, Inc. for the year ended December 29, 2002
                           (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
                           of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
                           Act of 1934; and

                  b)       information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                           in all material respects, the financial condition and
                           results of operations of Famous Dave's of America,
                           Inc.

Dated: March 28, 2003                     /s/ Martin J. O'Dowd
                                          Martin J. O'Dowd
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 28, 2003                    /s/ Kenneth J Stanecki
                                          Kenneth J. Stanecki
                                          Chief Financial Officer
REF ID:A40309 --~-~--.-- -----'------~-------- -~----- --~- - -

-------'------'~~""'--'-~~-~ .... .u-~ -~·7!4J --""'2...~-·_..._ @. ~-

___ ...μ1 ;1~1 .... ·~1.!~~ ~-~~---- -

______ 

1 

...... a .... ~ -·_A.-< ...... "--'- _.,...4 ~· & cMW.J • _k _ 

J_ - ~ dd~~~~:!!!:!d•!d•~'?1:!!!...-d~•.&!.-8-'8-:lt:I!.. 

____ 1..__-__,.,a;.__---=~~=4'=...ff""=7- ,. +<Ao<--.. 'f' ~-J4-tJ-~~ -1· 

I .u.~ ............ ~ 9-~ z,(..,JJ t;..W-.-

77.r"'1 ~,,(··._,,(_ ~ 

-------- - - - - _ _,. 

I /.t-~-&/-4··~ ,A4 ~~~ ~ 

_._: ___ ,~ ... -. ~ J-a ;:t:::-Z!: -----+-~~-~~M..11~ ~~ ""''YI~ f.4_~ -

-----1 .... ~-~-~'? f -.,, ~ /44 c· .,.." ~..., .... C4..-_.__. 

-----1·-g~~~~~ ta44NJ4h ~~~-

-----·"4 ~ «11,,~...., f--~L~~- ~ h-'~"" 

-~~-~ .... -d"""'Aw•..,.r-...c...,,, ~ OC +-'al,_ ~ v 4&~'11'~ •- _ _ _ _ 

-~-~---'------~-~~ ~62&~~~~~ ~,~-~'ftllkL_~~~d-"-

~~Hf.&kJ~~~~~IJtv.~-441- . ;:; 

-

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-26-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Order entered August 28, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00434-CR

ARTURO ARREOLA GAMIZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court of Appeals No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. MA14-18190-M

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s August 24, 2019 first motion to extend time to file his 

brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER his brief due on or before September 23, 2019.

/s/ BILL PEDERSEN, III 

JUSTICE
#### Hyland and another, Appellants, vs. Bohn Manufacturing Company, Respondent.

*November 26*

December *17, 1895.*

*Sale: Title retained as security: Remedies: Judgment.*

Vendors of logs, who retained title thereto and to the lumber made therefrom as security for the purchase money, are entitled to judgment in an action upon a note given for the purchase money, *575although they have already, in an action of replevin for the lumber, had judgment for the full amount of their special interest therein.

Appeal from a judgment of tbe circuit court for Ashland county: JohN K. Pabish, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

'The cause was submitted for the appellants on the brief of *TomJdns <& Merrill,*and for the respondent on a brief signed by *J. J. Miles, Harris Richardson,*and *Wa?mer, Richardson & Lawrence.*

Counsel for the respondent contended,

*inter alia,*that by bringing the actions in replevin and the suit on the note at the same time, the plaintiffs were seeking to adopt inconsistent remedies, as, under all the authorities, they could not rescind the contract, take the property, and also collect the notes. *Montelinxs v. Wood,*56 Iowa, 254; *Bensinger 8. A. C. R. Go. v. Gain,*4 Tex. App. Civ. Cas. 499; *Warren v. Landry,*74 Wis. 144; *Wield v. Burton,*49 Mich. 53; *Gromp-ton v. Beach,*62 Conn. 25; *Baker v. Bishop Hill Golony,*45 Ill. 264.

WiNsnow, J.

Plaintiffs sold logs to the defendant, and retained the title to the logs and the lumber manufactured therefrom as security for the purchase money. Upon default in payment of several notes given for the purchase .money, they replevied a large quantity of the lumber, and also brought this action to recover upon one of the notes. The replevin actions are the cases of *Hyland v. Bolin Mfg. Go,*92 Wis.-and-(decided at the present term).1 It appearing on the trial of this action that the plaintiffs had recovered in the replevin actions the full amount of their special interest in the lumber, judgment for the defendant was rendered in this action for that reason. This was erro-*576neons. The plaintiffs’ interest in the logs was by way of security for their debt. The principle is well established that the holder of securities may pursue his remedy upon his securities and his remedy at law upon his debt at the same time. He may thus obtain two judgments, but can have but one satisfaction. Jones, Chattel Mortg. (4th ed.), § 758.

*By the*Ooivrt.— Judgment reversed, and action remanded for a new trial.

1

 These cases were not finally determined until the denial of motions for rehearing on January 28,1896, and they are reported as of that date. — Rep,
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2489 

To require the maintenance of the country of origin markings for imported 

goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2021 

Mr. COTTON (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. RUBIO, 

Mr. HAGERTY, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To require the maintenance of the country of origin markings 

for imported goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Anti-BDS Labeling 

5 Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2489 IS

1 SEC. 2. CONTINUATION IN EFFECT OF COUNTRY OF ORIGIN 

2 MARKING POLICY FOR IMPORTED GOODS 

3 PRODUCED IN THE WEST BANK OR GAZA. 

4 The policy of the Government of the United States 

5 with respect to country of origin marking of imported 

6 goods produced in the West Bank or Gaza, notice of which 

7 was published by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in 

8 the Federal Register on December 23, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 

9 83984), shall remain in effect until repealed by an Act 

10 of Congress. 

11 SEC. 3. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS TO RESCIND OR 

12 CHANGE THE COUNTRY OF ORIGIN MARKING 

13 POLICY FOR IMPORTED GOODS PRODUCED 

14 IN THE WEST BANK OR GAZA. 

15 Notwithstanding any other provision of law, none of 

16 the funds authorized to be appropriated or otherwise made 

17 available for the Department of State or U.S. Customs 

18 and Border Protection on or after the date of the enact19 ment of this Act may be obligated or expended to prepare 

20 or promulgate any policy, guidance, regulation, notice, or 

21 Executive order or to otherwise implement, administer, or 

22 enforce any policy that rescinds or changes the policy of 

23 the Government of the United States with respect to coun24 try of origin marking of imported goods produced in the 

25 West Bank or Gaza, notice of which was published by U.S. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2489 IS

1 Customs and Border Protection in the Federal Register 

2 on December 23, 2020 (85 Fed. Reg. 83984). 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.25

                           AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE
                JCC HOLDING COMPANY 1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN

         This Amendment Number One (the "Amendment") to the JCC Holding Company
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan") is made and executed as of the 23rd
day of August, 2000, to be effective as of May 1, 2000.

         WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of JCC Holding Company (the "Company")
has approved an amendment to the Plan, pursuant to Section 15.1 of the Plan, to
increase the limit on the number of Plan shares that may be granted in the form
of awards of restricted or unrestricted stock awards;

         NOW, THERFORE, in accordance with Section 15.1 of the Plan, the Plan is
hereby amended as follows:

         1. Section 5.1 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and the
following is substituted therefor:

                  5.1 NUMBER OF SHARES. Subject to adjustment as provided in
         Section 14.1, the aggregate number of shares of Stock reserved and
         available for Awards or which may be used to provide a basis of
         measurement for or to determine the value of an Award (such as with a
         Stock Appreciation Right or Performance Unit Award) shall be 750,000,
         of which not more than 240,000 shares may be granted as Awards of
         Restricted Stock or unrestricted Stock Awards.

         2. As modified hereby, the provisions of the Plan, as heretofore
amended, shall remain in full force and effect, and the Plan may be restated, as
amended hereby, in its entirety.

         IN WITNESS WEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be duly
executed as of the date first above written.



                                         JCC HOLDING COMPANY


                                         By:
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Name:
                                            Title:
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Glen Burnie Bancorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to which this Certification is an exhibit (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

|  | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|  | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods reflected therein. |
|--|-----|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|                |                               |
|---------------------|------------------------------------|
| Date: June 13, 2018 | /s/ John D. Long                   |
|                | John D. Long                       |
|                | President, Chief Executive Officer |
|                | (Principal Executive Officer)      |
|                |                               |
|                |                               |

 

 

----
# C_2014342EN.01000401.xml

| 1.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 342/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 342/4

---

Election of the President of the Civil Service Tribunal

2014/C 342/05

On 17 September 2014, in accordance with Article 4(1) of Annex I to the Statute of the Court of Justice and Article 7(1) of the Rules of Procedure, the Judges of the Civil Service Tribunal re-elected S. VAN RAEPENBUSCH as President, with effect from 1 October 2014.

---
October 21, 2013 

Kevin D. Schlemmer, Chief 

United States Department of the Interior 

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE 

Kalaupapa National t-Jistorical Park 

P.O. 2222 

Kalaupapa, HI 96742 

Tel: 808-567·6802 

Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division 

u.s. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jerseys Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

;, •.... ' 

··,., 

Subject: Order 2013·10-3; Servicing Kalaupapa, Island of MolokaiJ Hawai'i; Service Commencing January 1, 2014 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer, 

Due to the isolated and remote work place at Kalaupapa National Histofical Park, our employees often need to fly out 

of Kalaupapa for work-related travel and Makani Kai has provided timely and effective service under the current 

Essential Air service contract. 

Sincerely, 

Erika Stein Espaniola 

Superintendent
NO. 12-08-00266-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

TONY MARTIN CALER, § APPEAL FROM THE 402ND

APPELLANT

V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

APPELLEE § WOOD COUNTY, TEXAS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Tony Martin Caler was convicted of failure to appear. His sentence was imposed

on April 23, 2008. That same day, Appellant, acting pro se, filed a notice of appeal with the Wood

County District Clerk, specifying that he wanted to appeal to the Sixth Court of Appeals in

Texarkana. On May 8, 2008, Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a notice of appeal on Appellant’s

behalf in which he stated Appellant’s desire to appeal the trial court's judgment to this court.

Wood County, the county from which this appeal originated, lies in two different appellate

districts. TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.201(g), (m) (Vernon Supp.2008). Appeals from Wood

County may be taken either to the Sixth or the Twelfth Court of Appeals. Id. Because there is no

procedure for allocating appeals between these two courts, an appellant is free to elect either court.

See Miles v. Ford Motor Co., 914 S.W.2d 135, 138 (Tex.1995). Jurisdiction lies in the appellate

court where the appeal is first perfected. Id. 

Here, in the first filed notice of appeal, Appellant designated the court to which he sought

to appeal as the Sixth Court of Appeals in Texarkana. “The general common law rule in Texas is

that ‘the court in which suit is first filed acquires dominant jurisdiction to the exclusion of other

coordinate courts.’” Id.; Curtis v. Gibbs, 511 S.W.2d 263, 267 (Tex.1974). Therefore, jurisdiction

lies solely in the Sixth Court of Appeals. See Miles, 914 S.W.2d at 138; Curtis, 511 S.W.2d at 267.
2

Because Appellant has already appealed to the Sixth Court of Appeals, that court has dominant

jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant cannot also invoke the jurisdiction of this court by filing a

later notice of appeal directed to this court.

This is a criminal case, with one appellant, and in this particular instance, the State has no

right of appeal. Therefore, we conclude that the proper remedy, rather than abating the case in

accordance with Miles, is to dismiss the appeal. See Capehart v. State, 257 S.W.3d 814, 815-16

(Tex. App.–Texarkana 2008, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a).

 BRIAN HOYLE 

 Justice

Opinion delivered May 13, 2009.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and Hoyle, j.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)