alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00597-CV

Joel SALINAS,

Appellant

v.

Denise MUNOZ,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-14-325

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ANGELINI, AND JUSTICE PULLIAM

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of 

the appeal are taxed against the party who incurred them.

SIGNED November 23, 2016.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice
# C_2014145EN.01001201.xml

| 15.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/12

---

Special Report No 4/2014

‘Integration of EU water policy objectives with the CAP: a partial success’

2014/C 145/07

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 4/2014 ‘Integration of EU water policy objectives with the CAP: a partial success’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’ |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Unit ‘Audit: Production of Reports’

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2250 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2250

  To extend concealed carry rights to Federal judges and prosecutors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2021

  Mr. Hawley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend concealed carry rights to Federal judges and prosecutors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROMOTING CONCEALED CARRY RIGHTS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT 
              OFFICERS.

    (a) Amendments.--Section 926B of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) For purposes of this section, a Federal judge, a Federal 
magistrate judge, or a Federal prosecutor shall be considered to be 
qualified law enforcement officer if the judge, magistrate judge, or 
prosecutor meets the criteria described in paragraphs (5) and (6) of 
subsection (c).
    ``(h) The Attorney General, or any United States Attorney, may file 
a civil action against any State government, State agency, or State 
employee to enjoin any actions or practices that impede qualified law 
enforcement officers from carrying a concealed firearm under subsection 
(a).''.
    (b) Regulations and Guidance.--The Attorney General shall--
            (1) promulgate regulations and issue guidance to implement 
        subsection (h) of section 926B of title 18, United States Code, 
        as added by subsection (a) of this section; and
            (2) develop and implement programs for qualified law 
        enforcement officers to report when they are impeded from 
        carrying a concealed firearm under section 926B of title 18, 
        United States Code, and to ascertain what remedial actions the 
        Department of Justice has taken.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to the Department of Justice to carry out this 
section.
                                 <all>
```
JAMES R. HOWELL,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2227

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 7, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

James R. Howell, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL HURLEY, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3555 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed July 3, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Tom Barber, Judge. Michael Hurley, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, LaROSE, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
• 

"6TANDARD FORM NO. 64 REF ID:A488560 

.• Office MemorandUm .. UNITEO syrns GOVERNMENT / ~+ .(f/v,jr . TO : ? U ; DATE: 

I); 

FROM : 

SUBJECT: 

jJ) \- 1 oo I 4-~ c.... '+ I 

W .. N-· tJi;,_. -IA ~ ,;b LU ""-4.o ~ 

~ ,,._,i= ~ + s--~ (,.a. ~ 

\ ~-=-- ~n ;v-.JY.l. ~ "oU \J· ~IS: 

----

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-06-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-16-00274-CV

State Farm Lloyds

v.

Rogelio Maldonado

On appeal from the

430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Cause No. C-4506-14-J

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion. Costs of the appeal are taxed against the 

party incurring same.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 10, 2016
.:. 

REF ID:A67458 I 

... 

. 

Jlr. ltal1ll'IOJ\lt D. Parke\" 

Coneul:U.ng 11>&\neer Coz:aaun1eatt.ona~!lectron1o• 

3606 Che•~ake ~treat, 1.w. 

Vaehil\jton 81 D. C. 

ha Rala 

iod.llla 3 '7 ')__ 

=iV er· ... ~ 

W1 t.b reference to plU' let.tel' ot l 7 J ci?U:r, and 1n 

connl'ill&UOD ot eU> tel.epbon.e oon'V9natlon 28 Jan.V.C7.1 .,_ 

ll%'fJ delighted to mov that. 70"' DJ be a.Ya.tlal:ile aa eaf.1.7 u 

\b9 WG ot l-5 febl"'.&IU"1 to help OV.t OD 80lllfJ Ot 0\11' ;>l"Obl••• 

HowctYel"1 I '\bink 1' aS.ght, bl 11110 .tor us ni-1t. \&> 41.aouaa 

the von • ha•• la Jllnd am 80Jr.e ot tho uranc,wmonta. & 

pztO~em U1.•es 1n aonnectlon vi th \he prQ\eoU.on of ,VO\J.r 

aoc1a1 S.0-#1 \7 •mmt. t)' &rd I abou1d like to lw.Yo our ,.opl.e 

p onr U\cl uhole utter VS.th .rou. Pleas• let ao know vtat 

date aipt i. convenient tor :ivu to rH.•ows• this • .. 

CCI AG 

c/s 

CONS 

R/D (Attna Mr. Turner) 

1'1?.lO.,..i.7 I 

A 

Vlt.Ll~..K 1. PRIETl'.d 

Cona\11. \Int 

M/lb Kr. Pa.ricer is 'to '9 taken on •• a WAE Consultant. 

w.r .Frl.edman/CONS/{,()493/29 Jan )3 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-30-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 30, 2022

No. 04-21-00416-CV

Kimi-Lyn MURRAY,

Appellant

v.

Phillip MURRAY,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-CI-19449

Honorable Monique Diaz, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s reply brief was due on August 29, 2022, but it was not filed. On September 

23, 2022, appellant filed an unopposed motion requesting an extension of time to file the reply 

brief along with the brief. After consideration, we grant the motion and deem the reply brief as 

timely filed.

It is so ORDERED September 30, 2022.

 PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, 

 CLERK OF COURT
<PAGE>

                             ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE

LEASE DATE:  March 31, 1994

LANDLORD:  Textron Collective Investment Trust

ADDRESS:  1515 West 2200 South #E1, West Valley City, UT  84119

TENANT:  DMCCB, Inc.

LEASE ADDRESS:  1455 West 2200 South, #300, West Valley City, Utah

    As Tenant under the above referenced Lease, the undersigned hereby
acknowledges for the benefit of: Lessor, (hereinafter "Lender") that:

1.   Tenant has accepted, is satisfied with, and is in full possession of
     said Premises, including all improvements, additions and alterations
     thereto required to be made by Landlord under the said Lease.

2.   Tenant is currently paying the full rent stipulated in said Lease with
     no offsets, defenses or claims.

3.   To the best of Tenant's knowledge Landlord has not been and is not
     presently in default under any of the terms, covenants or provisions of
     said Lease.

4.   Landlord has satisfactorily complied with all of the requirements and
     conditions precedent to the commencement of the term of said Lease as
     specified in said Lease.

5.   The fixed annual rent under said Lease is $120,893.40 for the 11 month
     period of the first year and no monies have been paid to Landlord more
     than five (5) days in advance of due date set forth in the Lease
     described above, except: N/A.

6.   The commencement date of said Lease is May 1, 1994.

     The Lease is for a term of (5) five years.

     Tenant in occupancy and paying rent since:  June 1, 1994.

8.   Tenant hereby acknowledges (a) that there have been no modifications or
     amendments to said Lease other than herein specifically stated, (b) that
     it has no notice of a prior assignment, hypothecation or pledge of rents
     or of the Lease, and (c) that notice of the proposed assignment of
     Landlord's interest in said Lease may be given it in person or by
     Certified Mail, postage prepaid, at the Premises, with a copy provided to:

              Fingerhut Companies, Inc.
              4400 Baker Road
              Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
              Attention: General Counsel

TENANT:  DMCCB, Inc.     or at such other address as Lessee shall designate by
       ----------------  written notice.

By:  Richard B Hoffman                    Its  S. VP Credit
   ------------------------------------       ----------------------------
    /s/ Richard B Hoffman
   ------------------------------------
   Please type or print above signature

Dated  9/19/94
     ----------------------------------
----------·----

pproved for Release by NSA on 

0-25-2013 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

--

'
**Exhibit 32.1**

**The following certification accompanies the issuer’s quarterly Report on Form 10and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and IC-25967, dated March 21, 2003**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 9067 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Summit Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Shirley W. Nelson, CEO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1.     | To the best of my knowledge, the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | 2.     | To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company. |

 

|   | /s/ SHIRLEY W. NELSON                         |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |
|   | **Shirley W. Nelson Chief Executive Officer** |

This certification accompanies this Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Appellate case name: Educap, Inc. v. Joanna Sanchez

Appellate case number: 01-12-01033-CV

Trial court case number: 980350

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 3 of Harris County

It is ordered that the motion for en banc reconsideration is denied.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

Acting for the En Banc Court

En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, 

Massengale, Brown, and Huddle.

A majority of the justices of the Court voted to deny the motion for en banc reconsideration.

Justice Sharp not participating.

Date: September 4, 2013
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of Riggs National Corporation (the Company)
for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lawrence I. Hebert, Principal Executive Officer
of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company. By:   /s/ Lawrence I. Hebert
Name: Lawrence I. Hebert
Principal Executive Officer
May 10, 2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MAURICE HARDY, a/k/a Reece,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2)

Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 25, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Hardy, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Marie Celeste, OFFICE OF THE UNITED 

STATES ATTORNEY, Peter Jeffrey Martinez, Assistant United States Attorney, 

Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Maurice Hardy appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) 

(2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United 

States v. May, F.3d , , No. 15-7912, 2017 WL 1479288, at *4-5 (4th Cir. Apr. 25, 

2017). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States 

v. Hardy, No. 1:11-cr-00358-ELH-2 (D. Md. July 12, 2016 & July 28, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Deichsel, Appellant, vs. The Town of Maine, Respondent.

*February 24*

March *22, 1892.*

*Highways: Liability of town for work done by overseer: Contracts.*

In the presence of another supervisor the chairman of a town board told the overseer of highways to fix a certain road so that it could be traveled. The town board afterwards allowed him part of his claim for the work done. *Held,*that as the board had not acted in employing him the town was not liable for the balance of his claim. It was-the duty of the overseer, under sec. 1233, B. S., to put the highway in repair.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Marathón*County.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Brown &*Pradt, and oral argument by A. *A. Pradt.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Mylrea db Mar-chetti,*and oral argument by *W. H. Mylrea.*

OetoN, J.

The complaint before the justice is that the plaintiff did work on the highway at the request of the town reasonably worth $81, and that $31 had been paid thereon. The plaintiff obtained judgment for $50, the balance unpaid, and the defendant town appealed to the circuit court. The plaintiff testified that he was path-master, and met one Nass, chairman of the town board, on the highway, and Nass told him to fix the road so that it could be traveled; and that another supervisor by the name of Goetch was present; and that the board allowed him $31 for his work, and refused to allow him the balance, because he had overworked the road money in his hands as overseer. It seems that the town had voted to collect the highway taxes in money, and that some inconsiderable sum thereof was on hand. This money must be expended by the town board. Sec. 1225, R. S. It is claimed that this *554demand was a charge upon this fund. The circuit court granted a nonsuit in the case, mainly on the ground that the town board had not acted in employing the plaintiff, and that therefore the town is not liable. The court decided correctly that the town was not bound by this separate action of the chairman. *Dennison v. Austin,*15 Wis. 354 It was the duty of the plaintiff, as overseer, whenever any part of the highway becomes impassable, to put it in passable condition as soon as practicable; and, if any person shall expend any labor exceeding his highway tax, he has credit therefor on his future taxes. Secs. 1233, 1234, R. S. The plaintiff testified that the chairman told him to fix the yoad so that it could be traveled. This is the emergency provided for in the above sections. The chairman entered into no contract with the plaintiff whatever. He merely told him to fix the road, as it was already his duty to do, as overseer. But to bind the town the supervisors must act as a town board.

*By the*Court.— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000352956
<NAME> FAFCO, INC

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-1999
<CASH>                                          784800
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  3260700
<ALLOWANCES>                                    598000
<INVENTORY>                                     960200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               4882900
<PP&E>                                         2985200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 2317400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6147400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1795000
<BONDS>                                         948100
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        412800
<OTHER-SE>                                     2991500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6147400
<SALES>                                        6613400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               6630300
<CGS>                                          3843500
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3843500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 34100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               53200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 702400
<INCOME-TAX>                                    184500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             517900
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    517900
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
Milliken Chemical Confidential

M14008

Beth Trenor

May 1, 2015

Page 1 of 1

 Chemical Synthesis and Structure

Si

O

H

Si

O

H

Si

O

Si

n

CAS 63148-57-2

n = 30-60

+

H

Si

O

H

Si

CAS 3277-26-7

triflic acid

Reaction mixture is distilled into 3 fractions--

H

Si

O H

Si

O H

Si

O H

Si

x

x = 1-4

major component (~81%)

H

Si

O H

Si

O H

Si

O

Si

y

y = 1-4

minor component (~3%)

H

Si

O H

Si

O

Si

minor component (~14%)

Si

O

H

Si

Si H

O

Si H

O

Si H

Si

O

Si

Distillation "heavies":

Distillation "lights":

Desired Product:

PMN Material (in blue box above):

Distilled reaction product of Polysiloxanes, Me Hydrogen (unspecified formula) and C4H14OSi2, 

heavy fraction. There are multiple chain-extension species, some of which are identified in 

the reaction scheme above. Primary (> 80%) component ((CH4OSi)nC4H14OSi2) has molecular 

weight range 194 – 374 (for n=1-4).

And other similar chain 

extension species (~2%)

Plus residual 

starting material 

(CAS 3277-26-7)

CONFIDENTIAL
EXHIBIT 32

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Arc Communications Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

(1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of and for the periods covered in the Report.




/s/ Peter A. Bordes, Jr.
-------------------------------
     Peter A. Bordes, Jr.
     Chief Executive Officer
     Arc Communications Inc.

March 29, 2004





<PAGE>




                                                             END OF FILING
# C_2015020EN.01000102.xml

| 22.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7468 — OJI Holdings/Itochu Corporation/Sales and Production JVS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 20/02)

On 16 January 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7468. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7468. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---