alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">M.H.Z. Physical Therapy, P.C., as Assignee of Kevindale Nurse, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered October 30, 2014. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Defendant opposed the motion and cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that it did not provide insurance coverage for the vehicle in question on the date of the accident. By order entered October 30, 2014, the Civil Court denied plaintiff's motion and granted defendant's cross motion.</p><p>In support of its cross motion, and in opposition to plaintiff's motion, defendant submitted an affidavit by its senior field support representative, who described the details of a record search which she had performed and stated that her search had revealed that there was no Allstate Insurance Company policy covering the subject vehicle in effect on the date of the accident. We find that defendant's affidavit was sufficient to demonstrate, prima facie, that plaintiff's claim did not arise out of a covered incident (<i>see Central Gen. Hosp. v Chubb Group of Ins. Cos.</i>, 90 NY2d 195, 199 [1997]; <a href="../2015/2015_50609.htm" target="_blank"><i>Renelique v Allstate Ins. Co.</i>, 47 Misc 3d 140</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50609[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2015]). Inasmuch as plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact, the Civil Court properly denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (<i>see Zuckerman v City of New York</i>, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]; <a href="../2015/2015_50609.htm" target="_blank"><i>Renelique v Allstate Ins. Co.</i>, 47 Misc 3d 140</a>[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 50609[U]).</p><p>Accordingly, the order is affirmed. </p><p>Weston, J.P., Aliotta and Elliot, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: November 21, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 95-50822 Summary Calendar

_____________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN BRETT ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas USDC No. A-91-CV-259

_________________________________________________________________ September 3, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John Brett Allen, #00307-16 5, appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his
sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Allen seeks to withdraw his guilty plea. The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals has already addressed Allen’s issues. S ee A llen v. Hadden , 57 F.3d 1529, 1537, 1541 (10th Cir.), cert. denied , 116 S.Ct. 544 (1995).
A F F I R M E D.-2-
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 55 (Monday, March 23, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06475]



[[Page 15229]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; Biomarker.
    Date: April 16, 2015.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health; Neuroscience Center; 6001 
Executive Boulevard; Rockville, MD 20852; (Telephone Conference 
Call).
    Contact Person: Joel A. Saydoff, Ph.D.; Scientific Review 
Officer; Scientific Review Branch; Division of Extramural Research; 
NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center; 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 
3205, MSC 9529; Bethesda, MD 20892-9529; 301-496-9223; 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7913161c15570a18001d161f1f39171011571e160f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3953565c55174a58405d565f5f79575051175e564f">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

     Dated: March 17, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-06475 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
REF ID:A414BBB1 

a . .o 

October 1,1919. 

Ma.Jor General George o. Squier, 

Washington, D. c. 

-· -My· dear Gen~ral Squier~ 

Your message of September 29th was received and, we have 

' . suspended all operat:ions _for the Si~l .Corps, awaiting the new ,tapes., In· the 

' ' ' \ meantime we have taken up some other gqvernment,work and will want to complete 

- . , it before starting on the new tapes which are now in preparation. 

Sincerely yours, 

l!\pproved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

.f
G. KENT MANGELSON AND 

CHRISTINE MANGELSON,

Appellant,

v.

HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION, NOT 

INDIVIDUALLY BUT SOLELY 

AS TRUSTEE FOR THE 

HOLDERS OF LUMINENT 

MORTGAGE TRUST 2006-3

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-4489

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 15, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County.

Adrian G. Soud, Judge.

Ray Hill, Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Sara Holladay-Tobias and C.H. Houston, III of McGuire Woods LLP, 

Jacksonville, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


WE CONSENT TO THE INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE IN REGISTRATION STATEMENT NO.
333-72738 OF JCC HOLDING COMPANY ON FORM S-8 OF OUR REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 22,
2002, (WHICH REPORT EXPRESSES AN UNQUALIFIED OPINION AND INCLUDES AN EMPHASIS
PARAGRAPH RELATED TO THE CONFIRMED PLAN OF REORGANIZATION WHICH BECAME EFFECTIVE
IN MARCH 2001), APPEARING IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K OF JCC HOLDING
COMPANY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2001.



/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA
MARCH 12, 2002
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL RAY CURTIS, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D19-1477

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed November 13, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P.

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court 

for DeSoto County; Don T. Hall, 

Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 775.084(1)(b)(1), Fla. Stat. (1991); Tillman v. State, 609 

So. 2d 1295 (Fla. 1992); Ross v. State, 601 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 1992); Hall v. State, 821 

So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Williams v. State, 898 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005); 

Davis v. State, 880 So. 2d 1292 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20

-0019

_________________ KRISTINE DAVENPORT ,

Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
COUNTY OF LINCOLN, a political subdivision of the State of Montana; SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY OF LINCOLN, State of Montana; and ROBY BOWE,

Defendants and Appellees. O R D E R

_________________ This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana Rules of Appellate Procedure

. After reviewing the Appellant’s Reply Brief filed on August 31, 2020 , this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the following Rule and must be resubmitted. M. R. App. P. 11(4)(a) states that reply briefs shall not exceed 5,000 words. Despite certifying her compliance with the Rule, Appellant has not complied with the word limit

. First, Appellant improperly has inserted hyphens between words in almost every sentence contained in the brief. These hyphens serve to circumvent a word processing program’s word count function, artificially reducing the brief’s word count to 5,000 or fewer words. Second, Appellant attached four exhibits, totaling ten pages, to her reply brief. These exhibits are merely extensions of Appellant’s arguments, and further serve to extend the length of her brief well past 5,000 words. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the signed original and nine copies of the referenced brief be returned for revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule

. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a signed original and nine copies of the revised brief ordered herein be filed within ten (10) days of the date of this Order with the Clerk of this Court and that one copy of the revised brief be served on each counsel of record; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than 08/31/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0019those necessary to comply with this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the postage costs for returning the referenced copies of Appellant’s brief will be billed to Appellant by the Clerk of this Court and shall be due and payable upon receipt; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief. The Clerk of this Court is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to Appellant and to all counsel upon whom the brief was served.

Electronically signed by: Beth Baker Justice, Montana Supreme Court August 31 2020
Chemical Structure 

[ X ] - CBi (entire page)
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from Form 10Q at
November  30,  1999  and is  qualified  in its  entirety  by  reference  to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-30-1999
<CASH>                                             148,000
<SECURITIES>                                     1,665,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                      105,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    42,000
<PP&E>                                              25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (24,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,961,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,823,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            25,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         113,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,961,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   223,000
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   207,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  16,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                          0
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.00



</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 28, 2018

No. 04-18-00139-CV

Courtney WILSON,

Appellant

v.

Pedro Gonzalez AGUILAR; SJJ&E Walls and Ceilings, Inc.; Cielo Automotive; Cielo 

Automotive DBA Cielo Trailers; Texas Pride Trailers, Inc.; and Beijing Wilbury International,

Appellees

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI21086

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

A filing fee of $205.00 was due when this appeal was filed but it was not paid. See

TEXAS SUPREME COURT ORDER REGARDING FEES CHARGED IN THE SUPREME COURT, IN CIVIL 

CASES IN THE COURTS OF APPEALS, AND BEFORE THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT 

LITIGATION (Misc. Docket No. 15-9158, Aug. 28, 2015). The clerk of the court notified 

appellant[s] of this deficiency in a letter dated March 8, 2018. The fee remains unpaid. Rule 5 

of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay –

at the time an item is presented for filing – whatever fees are required by statute 

or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order 

that is just.

TEX. R. APP. P. 5. 

We therefore ORDER appellant, on or before April 9, 2018 to either (1) pay the 

applicable filing fee, or (2) provide written proof to this court that she is indigent or otherwise 

excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying the fee. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1 (providing that indigent party who complies with provisions of that rule may 

proceed without advance payment of costs). If appellant fails to respond satisfactorily within the 

time ordered, this appeal will be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3.
_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 28th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2591

YVONNE W. GIPSON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

THOMAS P. DORE, Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home 

Equity Trust 2005-15; MARK S. DEVAN, Esq., As Substitute 

Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-15; GERARD F. 

MILES, JR. Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity 

Trust 2005-15; SHANNON MENAPACE, Esq., As Substitute 

Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-15; ERIN GLOTH, 

Esq., As Substitute Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 

2005-15; COVAHEY, BOOZER, DEVAN & DORE, P.A., As Attorneys 

for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-15; ALBA LAW GROUP, P.A., 

As Attorneys for GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-15; GOLDMAN, 

SACHS & CO. LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, a/k/a Goldman Sachs & Co.; 

GOLDMAN SACHS ALT A HOME EQUITY TRUST 2005-15, GSAA Home 

Equity Trust 2005-15, As Securitized Trust Issuing Entity 

and Foreclosing Entity, HSBC Bank USA, National 

Association, Trustee & Goldman Sachs & Co. Limited 

Partnership, a/k/a Goldman Sachs & Co.; HSBC BANK USA, 

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, As Trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust 

2005-15; WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., As for Master Servicer for 

GSAA Home Equity Trust 2005-15; PNC FINANCIAL SERVICES 

GROUP, INC., As Servicer For GSAA Home Equity Trust 

2005-15, As Servicer For National City Bank, a/k/a PNC, 

a/k/a PNC Bank, other As Successor In Interest to National 

City Mortgage Company's Servicing Rights other As Successor 

in Interest to National City Corporation other As Successor 

In Interest to National City Bank based in Ohio other As 

Successor In Interest to National City Bank of Indiana 

other As Successor In Interest to National City Mortgage 

Company A Subsidiary of National Bank of Indiana other As 

Successor In Interest to AccuBanc A division of National 

Bank of Indiana,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-02482-JFM)

Submitted: October 28, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before WYNN, FLOYD, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Yvonne W. Gipson, Appellant Pro Se. Alvin Frederick, Lauren 

Elizabeth Marini, ECCLESTON & WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland; 

Laurie Beth Goon, DUANE MORRIS, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Brett 

Lawrence Messinger, DUANE MORRIS, LLP, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania; Daniel J. Tobin, BALLAD SPAHR, LLP, Washington, 

D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Yvonne W. Gipson appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing her complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). 

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
REF ID:A2736 • 

.... 

·---------~-~---- ·-

\) 

---·· ------·· -- -·--· -- - - ----- --- --------..._...._ _________ -----· --------- - -----~-- ·---------------~--

a - ' ~{)_ :;, _ _lu..to -~ <-<:>_,, -=- .)_~~~~ J • -------------------

---- -· ---------- ------------ -------- -- --

--~------·~·-------------'----_:_.L _____________ ~ 

---·-- --------- --··-----

·, .; 

I ·--

-.. ,,.- . - ' . - -·-----......... ----:"--~··. ---~----.------'---------------~------ ~~--·------~--~--~-.-----

, .... , -

--~---------------- - -- --- - ------------------------ .. ___.._ ___ . -
A ~F 1~:~73. / - ,4 ~~ ........._ fJ I ~ .1 Y '"1 ~ ) -~ ~( \ 'i' "L ~ 

\:)~' '' ut/'1 1 011... --G.H. \~~ 4 S«i"1tT/.q1& 

" I ~J; ,.,_ ~~J ?. t; A)t) v. I~).~,,. .Lt..M. ...e )1 ~ (, 1 ~ .. g 7 B \ 

l ~.........___,_. o( II.'\ '°'1' I 'i ,1 I 'I "2. I _) 

\4~ - ,~~. ~o. t, «~ \J ~S") ") J'uAJ. 1q~'"1.. , ·' 

(A-~ ...A.~ ~.D T) ff\~ I \ '·"&. ., I ~u.e '°* I q-i...,. 0.., +) 

U.~~ S'). 1 S4'\ 1 ".S 

{»~c,.:.e 1 ('/e-'r. IVc:i \ , 4 l/2, I I~ 1 J.u o~. le;' 2. J> 

- ~~ 

- ... ...,.._:_ 

~----J 

a a •• Lft...LI..>.-·· a,,. ..Q . .<!lO~-~·~ J ..... 

•·· ~ 

~oi...·~S ·'. 

, ~ ', (') l A ~c.J2X--.. i ~"'"'- "is-' 

''C:~J. ~~~u_ C.u~~ ~~'' 

~'J... ~ w~ ~·21~ '~~~ 

("t) " '~~e..., ~ Mo...~ ,, ~ t> "''. ~~. 

~~ ~---, ~tA~~ 

~ ~·~ )" -t>M.. .o1\- 4 ) t· f . \ O'). C - t O""J '2J!. #.J Ml J I q 23 • 

(l) $~) Qo.X ~t>. \16f4'-1 l.40> llM~\~ 

l ~· +-&.R l ~. iei ,_,_, i::t c.,,o~ 1413) 

I 
.. : ' 

i .·· 

I' 

I 

. f 

' 

J 

f 

i 

., 

., 

•· f· 

/ 

'· 

-

, . 

.... 

·>~] 

' .·,~?~ 

. . :.~ .... . ~ ~ .· .< .. :i' -. ' ···-·--···~·J-.· ... , .• :..·· .... ·.~,·· ;..···.,..: .. ·~,-_,,:··.···,·~·-·.··.· .. ·_.',~-, .. ~_ • ~.-.~ ..• : ..... -:f.",,._;, 

-... ·~)QL: .. ~ }};.r;t ... :·.:.;*·: .. :~ .. .-~ • •. ,.· .• • -·-·.· .. · ... ~~ .•. · ~-' .-.. '··:... _··.·-.--·~-~·-· .. , .... · _ ··-···--- •· ... :.··.· _1 ··· ... ....- ,- :_ - _,,_ ....... -- - ...... -,:..,.:: .. _ .. - .~ ........ : .. ~· ~ _,;_;;. .. !'-...:.·.·"~-.i •• ':.:.~·-..:. ·:).,~-- .. ·:~ .... v~..;~ •. ,.;~~-~..;._ .•• .ii:..:. __ .. -~~--::~<Ai..:::~ .. ~::.~:,.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000352715
<NAME> BIOSONICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   80,446
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,000
<INVENTORY>                                     64,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               148,596
<PP&E>                                         254,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                 241,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 170,533
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,372,319
<BONDS>                                        278,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        29,461
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,201,786)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   170,533
<SALES>                                          5,625
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,617
<CGS>                                            3,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  145,168
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                40,742
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,208
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (182,697)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (182,697)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>