alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014397EN.01000201.xml

| 12.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 397/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 397/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 November 2014

2014/C 397/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2424 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,88 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4401 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78360 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1908 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2024 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4865 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,592 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,59 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2235 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4240 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8137 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4386 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4150 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6332 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6008 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6077 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 362,54 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0199 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6077 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6650 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 186,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1562 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,827 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 57,9870 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,848 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1908 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8979 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,4635 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2424

JPY

Japanese yen

143,88

DKK

Danish krone

7,4401

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78360

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1908

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2024

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4865

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,592

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,59

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2235

RON

Romanian leu

4,4240

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8137

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4386

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4150

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6332

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6008

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6077

KRW

South Korean won

1 362,54

ZAR

South African rand

14,0199

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6077

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6650

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 186,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1562

PHP

Philippine peso

55,827

RUB

Russian rouble

57,9870

THB

Thai baht

40,848

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1908

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8979

INR

Indian rupee

76,4635

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14162-14163]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06171]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration

[TA-W-85,483]


SMC Electrical Products, Inc., a Subsidiary of Becker Mining 
America, Inc., Including On-Site Leased Workers From Bristol Computer 
Services, Kelly Services and Ensin Maintenance Services, Barboursville, 
West Virginia; Amended Certification Regarding Eligibility To Apply for 
Worker Adjustment Assistance

    In accordance with section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended 
(``Act''), 19 U.S.C. 2273, the Department of Labor issued a 
Certification of Eligibility to Apply for Worker Adjustment

[[Page 14163]]

Assistance on September 25, 2014, applicable to workers of SMC 
Electrical Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Becker Mining America, Inc., 
including on-site leased workers from Bristol Computer Services and 
Kelly Services, Barboursville, West Virginia (TA-W-85,483). The 
Department's Notice of Determination was published in the Federal 
Register on September 11, 2014 (79 FR 54291).
    At the request of a state workforce official, the Department 
reviewed the certification for workers of the subject firm. The firm is 
engaged in the production of electrical power control systems.
    The investigation confirmed that workers of Ensin Maintenance 
Services were employed on-site and were sufficiently under the control 
of the subject firm to be considered leased workers.
    The amended notice applicable to TA-W-85,483 and TA-W-85,483A is 
hereby issued as follows:

    All workers of SMC Electrical Products, Inc., a subsidiary of 
Becker Mining America, Inc., including on-site leased workers from 
Bristol Computer Services, Kelly Services and Ensin Maintenance 
Services, Barboursville, West Virginia (TA-W-85,483) and SMC 
Electrical Products, Inc., a subsidiary of Becker Mining America, 
Inc., including on-site leased workers from Bristol Computer 
Services and Kelly Services, Delta, Colorado (TA-W-85,483A) who 
became totally or partially separated from employment on or after 
August 13, 2013 through September 26, 2016 are eligible to apply for 
adjustment assistance under Chapter 2 of Title II of the Trade Act 
of 1974, as amended, and are also eligible to apply for alternative 
trade adjustment assistance under Section 246 of the Trade Act of 
1974, as amended.

    Signed in Washington, DC, this 25th day of February, 2015.
Michael W. Jaffe,
Certifying Officer, Office of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2015-06171 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-FN-P
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code), I, Michael G. Long, Chief Financial Officer of EdgePetroleum Corporation, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), herebycertify, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:    March  16, 2005 | /s/ Michael G. Long |
|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------|
|                                          | Name:               | Michael G. Long |
|                                          |                | Chief Financial and  Accounting Officer |

 

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0559. JAMES WALLEN SNUGGS, SR. v. LOUISE WALLEN SNUGGS

et al.

On September 4, 2015, the trial court granted defendant John Mason Snuggs,

Sr.’s motion to revive a 2003 judgment against co-defendant Louise Wallen Snuggs

on John Snuggs’s cross-claimfor contribution and indemnification in this civil action. 

John Snuggs filed a motion for reconsideration, which the trial court denied on April

19, 2016. On May 19, 2016, James Wallen Snuggs, Sr, asthe personal representative

of the estate of Louise Snuggs, filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s April 19

order.1

 We, however, lack jurisdiction.

A notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of the entry of the order sought

to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). “The proper and timely filing of a notice

of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction upon an appellate court.”

Perlman v. Perlman, 318 Ga. App. 731, 739 (4) (734 SE2d 560) (2012) (citation and

punctuation omitted). The filing of a motion for reconsideration does not extend the

time for filing a notice of appeal, and the denial of such a motion is not directly

appealable. See State v. White, 282 Ga. 859, 860 (1) (655 SE2d 575) (2008); Bell v.

Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 510 (536 SE2d 187) (2000). Here, James Snuggs filed

his notice of appeal 258 days after entry of the trial court’s order reviving the

judgment. The notice of appeal is untimely as to the trial court’s order reviving the

1

James Snuggs originally filed his appeal in the Georgia Supreme Court, which

transferred the matter to this Court. See Case No. S17A0189 (decided October 3,

2016).

November 18, 2016
judgment and invalid as to the order denying the motion for reconsideration.

This appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/18/2016
REF ID:A66549 

SUBJECTs Priorit;y ot Safeguarding Classified. 

Intormation 

TO: APSA-16 FROK1 A.FSA-OCT DATEt 27 Nov 1950 COMJIFNT NO. 2 

1. Reference question in Par. 2b, at"tinnative. 

2. llaterial in Meilink sate an1 4-drawer combination look cabinet to be saved 

or destroyed (as the case ma.y be) under any c1rcumstancee. 

3. I have no elauaitied material other than that indicated in Par. 2. 

1'/IU.IAll JI'. FRIEDYAN 

AFSA-00'1' 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-08-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

......... ____________ _ .. ' .... ---
~--~---~ 

MEMO ROUTING SLIPf ~l'H~lt~~ALS, DISAPl'ltOVALS, 

CONCURRENCF.S. Olt SIMILAIC ACTIONS 

I NAME ORI!:': 

RAV~"1 INITIALS DRCULATE r1 .) . ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION r R-o_j) DATE COORDINATION 

2 FILE 

- INFORMATION 

3 NECESSARY 

ACTION 

- NOTt AND 

REIURN 

4 IEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

REllARKS 

1.~~~~' 

~~:2£~ ~·,~~ ·~ :rd Lvw.t. ~ ~ ':fl. 

_)-k. ... L,·:t~ ~ L ~-~ ~ ·J;"; ~ ..J.li ~ . ,.>f'(._ s ......,_ 

~ "'"-•At~- ;(.. ~ ~ 

~ ·r c;sc;.c.. ~-· ~b. 

"'°"MHnn> ifl1J~ ··- DATE~ 

ORGAllZAnON AND LOCA: . 

......... ~' 'IUEPHONE 

ICl.ooroved for Release bv NSA on 06-02-2014 oursuant to E.O. 1352 [) 

.. 
-~-·· 

I 

I 

; 

I 

3Zo A 

-~---·· 

. l!Go 

.... , ... --·. 

200 c 

--·~···· ···- . 

REF ID:A67358 

, __ .;oo 

J 

i.. . I 

I 

~- -·---·-·----- ··- .ro o. ·- --····-·--··--··-. < .• / 

... ~-------------- ~-· . 

~~. ~ ~ ~ ·.~ u 

ij ~ ~ ~- ~ ij ~ I-~ 

V" 

EIN AUS 

d 

---~!~· LO<"HST~ • laEe4.,.E" 

·A· - M~~cw.weRk 

~ - ~.A-11.J DL 0. · UM~~TLe~. 

2.9.f.SS:-

. .;:;.:_···--
REF ID:A67358 

------------------- -- - - - - - - -- -- - - -- - - -

e 4s-o 

:..-l 

f 

~ 

Zoo .. t 

.· .· 

35"'0 

:, 

.· 

Soo _/ 

.. ./ -.... / ....... ~ 

~ 

/'.~. 

~. f.SS' 

,..,,=;·,--- .. 

-

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

j 

I 

j 
- I 

!?t1tt~ 

e( ec,fvonA.ct/eV(t:fl, 

1#,e/. 

/Ofllt't,~-

~ ---. 

N,tp,. ' 

(;.,,,,- "'f) I 

fa~e-~11£ ~ 

C'lltRt/-1.Hf-,.... I ~ -.cier. ·-

~zo v A-c so(.Y 

1 F/,cfyp11f,- ~e11e~ftlr 

fir doee.6/ea>(4e~ff?~ 

~£fe4,f t1t1er N'/~4 .$ .. 'l&lba;~ ~ c~«elf~h11 f $ ~ tl,,-

.rlt,,lb/ ~it.Mc tt.fRJfir:tp 

lfd,l--/111 ~ l 0'1,Jt I 

{/''4 cl. C"Of,t. lf,fc.~ 

C41,tl dt1'1t/Jte -

4U(1",,/k.n '1 de~1t-c} , 
------------ -

~\lffBf ri:Ri~~@T, l~ii"~ ---- ll ~ ./ (/) ,-- / (j7 I I~ 5" ~ . ~ , llil 'ci.c.IL - I n ...,.. - tw;z.,..(4-~ 

- \- ·'~(]' ~- ~~~ ~· ~ ~ ?~ ------

~-"2l 

N ~~ ~ s ~ ~ 

~ ~' ; .SS 

~ C'lo - -

..(? 

u f 

"" - ~ 
' • 

\ 

I .------.. 

G 

if 

n C'· .0 

\ 

' ~ ----·-/ t- \ ~-- • 

... 
REF ID:A67358 

• 

) 

\ , 

/
REF ID:A104893 

e 

0 0 p y 

SIGiIAL CORPS P.A.Tlil!-'JT :BO.Alm 

Ml!IETI:!.m l-!O. 12 

l. The :Board met a.t 10: 00 A.!I., June 24, 1937, in Rool!l 3435, ?~unitions 

:Building. All nembcrs 1.'18re present. 

2. The pu.rpo se of the oeeting l'BS to consider the following cases and 

make recor.i.~enda.tions for appropriate action: 

~· A query frOlll Mr. lf. F. Friedman as to whether the Chief' Signal 

Of'ficer has a.Icy" objection to his (Mr. FriedriBn 1 s) disposal of his commercial 

rights in an invention described in memoranda. dated March 24, 1937 and April 

:J9, 1936 • 

.J!. An invention b:r :.:r. W.F.F1•iedman of' a cr;r.pta:nalytic coincidence 

counter • 

.9.• An inventian by Mr. lf .F.Friedr:lan of a mchine :for locating 

idio:corphs and isomorphs. 

~· An invention by ?-!?" • .Albert D. Hartin, Jr., of a radio system 

for radio range beacon. 

3. The Board finds: 

a. The ~oard withheld final action on the Jilatters described under 

pa:ra.graph-2.~ D.lld 2.S: above pending receipt of further informtion • 

.:g. W'ith reference to tho inventions desc1·ibed under :::>&ra,eraph 2 • .:g 

and 2._e above: 

(1) !J!'nat the inventions have nilitary value and that they should 

be kept secret. 

(2) !l!hat these inventions a.rose in connection with and as a 

result of the official duties of Mr. Friedman but that there is no 

advantage in filing a patent application and thereby risking premature disclosure. · 

4. The :Board reco!'llilends: 

!:• Tbat l.U-. Friedme.?l. 1 s inventions described under paragraph 2.J? and 

2 • .s above be filed as a matter of record and for possible future use if and 

when development should become desirable. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-12-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A104893 

Louis :B. :Bender, 

Lieut. Colonel, Signal Corps 

President 

W. S. Rumbaugh 

I·!a..;Jor, Sismil Corps, 

?Ienber 

e 

George I. ls.ck 

Captain, Sibll&l Corps 

!Iel!lber 

R. P. Brotm.ing, 

Major, Si.;nal Corps 

.Recorder 

.APPROVED JUNE---• 1937: 

' 

Da'l:rson OJ.r:istead 

Colonel, Sisn&l Corps 

Acting Chief Signal Officer of the Array 

2 

------------------------
Exhibit 11
                                     
                  Metris Companies Inc. and Subsidiaries
                     Computation of Earnings Per Share
              (in thousands, except share and per share data)

                                            Years Ended December 31,
                                         1996        1995         1994
Primary:                                                       
Net income                           $    20,016   $     4,581  $     2,198
                                                               
Weighted average shares of common     16,572,040    15,966,667   15,966,667
stock outstanding (1)                
Common stock equivalents (2)             557,578       402,479      303,660
                                                               
Weighted average common and common    17,129,618    16,369,146   16,270,327
equivalent shares                     
                                                               
Net income per share                 $      1.17   $      0.28  $      0.14
                                                               
Fully Diluted:                                                 
Net Income                           $    20,016   $     4,581  $     2,198
                                                               
Weighted average shares of common     16,572,040    15,966,667   15,966,667
stock outstanding (1)                 
Common stock equivalents (2)             670,258       472,740      303,660
                                                               
Weighted average common and common    17,242,298    16,439,407   16,270,327
equivalent shares                    
                                                               
Net income per share                 $      1.16   $      0.28  $      0.14

(1)  Assume shares outstanding as if the Company reorganization had
     occurred at the beginning of the years shown.
(2)  Based on the treasury stock method using the average market price for
     primary earnings per share and the higher of the average or year-end market
     price for fully diluted earnings per share.  Prior to October 25, 1996, the
     initial public offering price of $16 was used.
# C_2014457EN.01000801.xml

| 19.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 457/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 457/8

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 December 2014

(2014/C 457/06)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2285 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,96 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4393 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78650 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4361 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2052 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0645 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,606 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,45280 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2422 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4713 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8533 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,5005 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4248 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,5292 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5861 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6149 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 347,16 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1879 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6364 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6675 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 440,50 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2521 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 54,972 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 75,4850 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,376 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2777 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8120 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,4772 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2285

JPY

Japanese yen

145,96

DKK

Danish krone

7,4393

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78650

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4361

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2052

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0645

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,606

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,45280

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2422

RON

Romanian leu

4,4713

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8533

AUD

Australian dollar

1,5005

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4248

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,5292

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5861

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6149

KRW

South Korean won

1 347,16

ZAR

South African rand

14,1879

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6364

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6675

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 440,50

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2521

PHP

Philippine peso

54,972

RUB

Russian rouble

75,4850

THB

Thai baht

40,376

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2777

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8120

INR

Indian rupee

77,4772

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
STATE OF DELAWARE
I.D. No. 9901005150

Vv.

MAURICE J. WILLIAMS,

wee se YS YSN WY

Defendant.

Submitted: November 3, 2016
Decided: November 21, 2016

ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING
MOTION FOR POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

This 21st day of November, 2016, upon consideration of the Motion for
Post-Conviction Relief filed by Maurice Williams, the record in this matter, and
Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 (“Rule 61”), it appears to the Court that:

1. Williams seeks post-conviction relief for charges to which he pleaded
guilty in April 1999. Williams argues that he illegally was sentenced in this case, a
sentence later corrected by this Court, and that the Department of Correction
(“DOC”) improperly held him after the date he should have been released. While
held by DOC at Level IV, improperly he contends, Williams absconded from the
Level IV facility. He later was charged and convicted of Escape After Conviction.
He also was sentenced for violating his probation in this case and was sentenced to
two additional years at Level V for that violation.

2. Williams has a history of making frivolous filings in this Court, and


his current Motion is no exception. The Motion could be denied on any number of
bases. So as not to waste any more resources on this case than already have been
expended, the Court will choose just one: the Motion procedurally is barred under
Rule 61(i). Under that Rule, a motion for post-conviction relief procedurally is
barred if it is untimely or repetitive, among other reasons. Williams’ Motion is
both. The Motion was filed more than one year after the judgment of conviction
was final. It also repeats issues that previously were adjudicated by this Court and
the Delaware Supreme Court.!

3. Williams has not pleaded with particularity either of the exceptions to
the procedural bars. He has not alleged, either generally or particularly, that new
evidence creates a strong inference of actual innocence or that a new rule of
constitutional law, made retroactive on collateral review, renders the conviction
invalid.’

The Motion for Post-Conviction Relief therefore is SUMMARILY

DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Original to Prothonotary
ce: Joseph S. Grubb, Esquire
Maurice J. Williams, pro se (SBI No. 00218653)

' See D.I. 40, 53.
> Super. Ct. Crim. R. 61(i)(5); 61(d)(2).
• REF ID:A70932 

3 • 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT 

t'Jitbdrawal of Funds 

To: P..S-2S 

From· AS-SO 

BRIEF SUMMARY: 

CLASSIFICATION NUMBER: 

Budget Estimate & Requirements 

Date of Communication: 18- Feb 48 

Date of Basic Document. 12 Feb 48 

It ls requested that $1;,ooo.oo ot pro3ect 310 funds be made 

available to CSGAS-85' tor the procurement or SIABA and SIGCOO part~, Project 120, to be used in the rehab111tat1on of these 

macm.nes tor \Jar Reserve stock. 

Class1f1er llrs Beyke Routed to File 

T yp1st 1Ir s Beyke Date of Class1fymg· 1 l.!rar 48 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS 

FILEStorage & Preservation of Crn>to Material 

1tion1ng of 

WDGAS Farm No. 1493 7 Octob1r 1946 44052 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

918 

KA 14-00235 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JUDSON WATKINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (ROMANA A. LAVALAS

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of

the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of

the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), entered December 18,

2013. The order denied the motion of defendant pursuant to CPL 440.20

(1). 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law, the motion is granted, the sentence

is set aside and the matter is remitted to Onondaga County Court for

resentencing. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals by permission of this Court

pursuant to CPL 460.15 from an order denying his motion pursuant to

CPL 440.20 (1) seeking to set aside his sentence on the ground that he

was improperly adjudicated a persistent felony offender. We agree

with defendant that County Court erred in denying the motion upon

determining that this issue was previously addressed on the merits

(see CPL 440.20 [2], [3]). Although defendant has filed four prior

CPL article 440 motions, one of which was considered by this Court on

appeal (People v Watkins, 79 AD3d 1648, lv denied 16 NY3d 800), the

precise issue raised herein was not addressed by this Court on that

appeal or on defendant’s direct appeal (People v Watkins, 17 AD3d

1083, 1084, lv denied 5 NY3d 771). On the merits, we agree with

defendant that the court erred in designating him a persistent felony

offender because he had not been sentenced to a period of more than

one year on two of the three proposed predicate felonies (see Penal

Law § 70.10 [1] [b] [i]). Although the People are correct that the

prior felony convictions of robbery in the second degree (§ 160.10)

and attempted burglary in the second degree (§§ 110.00, 140.25) are

predicate violent felony offenses that satisfy the requirements to

determine that defendant is a persistent violent felony offender (see

§ 70.08 [1] [a]), the record does not establish whether those
-2- 918 

KA 14-00235 

convictions meet the criteria of section 70.08 (1) (b), and we

therefore decline the People’s request to modify defendant’s

designation. Thus, we reverse the order, grant the motion, vacate the

sentence and remit the matter to County Court for resentencing. 

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court