alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ROBERT MCKINNON, III,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3577

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 10, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Alachua County.

Mark W. Moseley, Judge.

Robert McKinnon, III, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
(logo)HOMESIDE
          LENDING, INC.






As of February  28, 1997 and for the period from March 16, 1996 to February  28,
1997,  HomeSide  Lending,  Inc. has complied in all material  respects  with the
minimum  servicing  standards set forth in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of
America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS. As of and for
this same  period,  HomeSide  Lending,  Inc.  had in effect a fidelity  bond and
errors  and  omissions  policy in the  amount of $76  million  and $20  million,
respectively.


/s/William Glasgow, Jr.
William Glasgow, Jr.
Executive Vice President

5/30/97
Date




       Post Office Box 44090, Jacksonville, FL 32231-4090  904-281-3000
                                                      (logo)EQUAL HOUSING LENDER
EXHIBIT 32.2


                                  Certification
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                                   As Adopted
                         Pursuant to Section 906 of the
                                   Sarbanes -
                                Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly  report of China  Biopharmaceuticals  Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission  ("SEC") on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         i. the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a)or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         ii. the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the  Company and will be  furnished  to the SEC or its staff
upon request.

  /s/ HUNAG Chentai
------------------------------
HUANG Chentai
Chief Financial Officer
November 22, 2004

This  Certification  of Chief Financial  Officer  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 is not  "filed"  for  purposes  of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange  Act of  1934  but is  instead  furnished  as  provided  by
applicable rules of the Securities Exchange Commission.
#### The Town of Williamstown, Respondent, vs. Darge, imp., Appellant.

*April 20*

May *12, 1888.*

*Appealable order: Criminal contempt.*

An order adjudging a defendant in criminal contempt for the violation of an injunction is not appealable. *In re Murphey,*39 Wis. 286, followed.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Dodge*County.-

The appellant was adjudged to be guilty of contempt in violating an injunctional order restraining him and others from further building a bridge across Rock river, and was ordered to pajr a fine and the costs- of the contempt proceedings, and to be imprisoned in the county jail until such fine and costs were paid, the term of such imprisonment not to exceed thirty days.

Eor the appellant there was a brief by *Eli & O. E. Hooker*and *James E.*Malone, and oral argument by *Mr. Malone.*

Eor the respondent there was a brief by *F. M. Lawrence*and *James J. Diek,*and oral argument by *Mr. Dick.,*

Pee Cueiam.

This is an appeal from an order adjudging the appellant in contempt for the violation of an injunction. It is for misconduct and a wilful disregard of the order of the court, and is consequently a criminal contempt. It was held in *In re Murphey,*39 Wis. 286, that such an order was not appealable. It is said in that case that this question of practice must be deemed settled. The appeal must therefore be dismissed.
<PAGE>   1




                                  [EXHIBIT 11]

                         NORTH FORK BANCORPORATION, INC.


              COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                               SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
                                   (UNAUDITED)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                              THREE MONTHS ENDED               NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                         --------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             SEPT. 30,       SEPT. 30,      SEPT. 30,      SEPT. 30,
                                                         --------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                          <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Net Income..............................................     $54,130,391    $52,666,723    $166,057,908   $110,938,798

Common Equivalent Shares:

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding..............     134,484,046    141,810,526     137,341,524    140,547,095
Weighted Average Common Equivalent Shares ..............         779,862        923,912         855,075      1,132,553
                                                         --------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares....     135,263,908    142,734,438     138,196,599    141,679,648
                                                         ==============================================================

Net Income per Common Equivalent Share - Basic..........           $0.40          $0.37           $1.21          $0.79
Net Income per Common Equivalent Share - Diluted........           $0.40          $0.37           $1.20          $0.78

</TABLE>



                                       23
[OP SEGRE]_ tr ::- ~ 

~-~~ . (~)~L 

~~·····f:O·····~~~~~ 

'f-v .. L__J 7 /w s-"l I 0 }--

OGA 

Declassified and 

Eipproved for release 

by NSA on 

11-20-2014 pursuant 

o E.O. 13526
Exhibit 23.5


           CONSENT OF NOVOGRADAC & COMPANY LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


         We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-103005) of Capital Alliance Income Trust Ltd., A
Real Estate Investment Trust of our report dated April 6, 2004 with respect to
the financial statements of Capital Alliance Income Trust Ltd., A Real Estate
Investment Trust included in this Annual Report (Form 10-KSB) for the year ended
December 31, 2003.


                                                    /s/ Novogradac & Company LLP

San Francisco, California
April 13, 2004
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

AARON MOHANLAL , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 1 7

- 1 3 82

[ September 20, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.85 0 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seven teenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Marc H. Gold

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 04

- 0020405

- CF

- 10 A

.

Aaron Mohanlal

, Okeechobee , pro se

.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Melanie Dale Surber, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed

.

T

AYLOR , C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
• 

Telephone 

Executive 1940 

BRITISH JOINT SERVICES MISSION 

Main Navy Building 

Washington 25, D.C. 

Pl/593 26 February 1954 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Director, National Security Agency 

38o1 Nebraska Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D. C. 

FROM: British Cryptographic Liaison Of'f'icer 

Room 4904, Ma.in·Navy Building 

Subject: Release of AFSAM 7 

1. It is probably known to you that the U .K. Chief's of Staff' have 

approved the report of the 1953 Comrrrunications Security Conf'erence 

and that the U.S. Joint Chief's of Staf'f' have been so informed. I am 

instructed by the Secretary, C.P.B. to inform you that, in the course 

of consideration.of' this Report by the cognisant U.~. authorities, 

L.S.I.B. approved the release of AFB.AM 7 for international NATO 

communications. ,._ , - . 2. In addition,· separately from the Report, consi~ration was given 

to the release of AFSAM 7 for the national communications of NATO 

nations, since it was thought that sooner or later such use would 

prove necessary. ~s- further release has been approved by the C.P.B. 

and has also been apI)roved by L.S.I.B. "when the need arises, on the 

understanding that C.P.B. confirlJlli with U.S. COMSEC authorities that 

U.S.C.I.B. has no objection. 11 This is approval in principle and is 

not concerned with the timing of the release. The Secretary, C.P.B. 

therefore requests that he may be informed if and when U.S.C.I.B. 

approves in principle the release of AFS.AM 7 to NATO nations for 

national communications and also if and when a decision is taken to 

release any of the ma.chines. 

Cryptographic Liaison.· Off'icer 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-11-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

TOP SECf~ET
# C_2014344EN.01000102.xml

| 2.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 344/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 344/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7384 — Helvetia/Nationale Suisse)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 344/02

On 25 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7384. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7384. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), As Adopted

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Southeastern Banking Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Cornelius P. Holland, III, President & Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Alyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CORNELIUS P. HOLLAND, IIICornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO/s/ ALYSON G. BEASLEYAlyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer


Date: November 14, 2007
# C_2014388EN.01000101.xml

| 3.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 388/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 388/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 388/01

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 380, 27.10.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 372, 20.10.2014

OJ C 361, 13.10.2014

OJ C 351, 6.10.2014

OJ C 339, 29.9.2014

OJ C 329, 22.9.2014

OJ C 315, 15.9.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
EXIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of China Biopharmaceuticals Holdings, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of
the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge: 1) The report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and

2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Chris Peng Mao     
| |                        
| |                        
| | Chris Peng Mao         
| | Chief Executive Officer
| | October 29, 2009       

---
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

EXHIBIT 12.1 UNIFRAX CORPORATION COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED
             CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31
                                                   2000         2001         2002
                                                -------      -------      -------
                                                         (IN THOUSANDS)
<S>                                             <C>          <C>          <C>
Earnings from continuing operations before
     income taxes and minority interest         $11,390      $12,885      $13,553

Fixed charges
     Interest                                    11,692       12,626       12,221
     Imputed interest on operating lease
         obligations                                561          848          727
                                                -------      -------      -------
                                                 12,253       13,474       12,948

Adjusted earnings available for payment of
     fixed charges                              $23,643      $26,359      $26,501
                                                =======      =======      =======

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                  1.9          2.0          2.0
                                                =======      =======      =======
</TABLE>


                                                                              58
# C_2014410EN.01000102.xml

| 18.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7284 — Siemens/John Wood Group/Rolls-Royce Combined ADGT Business/RWG)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 410/02

On 4 August 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7284. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7284. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Exhibit 7.1**

**Videotron Ltd.**

**Statement Regarding Calculation of Ratio of Earnings toFixed Charges as Disclosed in**

**Videotron Ltd.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Year Ended December 31,2010**

For the purpose of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges disclosed in Videotron Ltd.’s AnnualReport on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2010, (i) earnings consist of net (loss) income plus non-controlling interest in a subsidiary, income taxes, fixed charges, amortized capitalized interest, less interest capitalized, and(ii) fixed charges consist of interest expensed and capitalized, excluding interest on QMI subordinated loans, plus amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses relating to indebtedness and an estimate of the interest within rentalexpense.
### The Honorable William G. Cambridge, Chief Judge, Unite d 1 

### States District Court for the District of Nebraska. ___________ No. 95-3790

___________ Norma E. Lohse, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Co., * [UNPUBLISHED] a Delaware Corporation, * * Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 5, 1996 Filed: July 30, 1996

___________ Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. NormaE. Lohse appeals from the judgment of the district court 1 ente redupon a jury verdict for defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., i n Lohse's negligence action. Because Lohse has not provided a transcript, we c annot review the issues she raises on appeal. See Fed. R. App. P . 10(b)(2); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners , 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam), cert. denied , 484 U.S. 1071 (1988). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. W e deny Lohse's and Wal-Mart's motions on appeal.

### -2- A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
|   | (1) | the      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | information      contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                   /s/ David A.    Martin                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                  David      A. Martin                                                 Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer                                                 (Principal      Financial Officer) |
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 1 8 - 0415 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. CHELSEY L. FLESHER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upo n consideration of Appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal and good cause appearing , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s appeal in the above matter is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 8 2020

12/08/2020
Case Number: DA 18-0415