alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130323 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130323 

 COA: 255819 
 Wayne CC: 88-011275-01 

DWIGHT HASSAD RASHAD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 22, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0522 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 30, 2006 

Clerk
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 12, 2019

Nos. 04-18-00802-CR & 04-18-00803-CR

Kenton Lance LIGHT,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 6330 & 6328

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due 

July 8, 2019. No further extensions will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of June, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
# C_2015154EN.01000101.xml

| 9.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7581 — Hitachi/AnsaldoBreda and Ansaldo STS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 154/01)

On 29 April 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7581. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7581. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
I I I • 

ADOR.:'SS Ol'P1CIA&. C'OUMUNICA'TlDNS TO 

THlt SltCRltl ARY 01' STATlt 

WASHINGTON. D. C • -

CT- 51f'/ 

REF ID:A6727-

• 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

WASHINGTON 

February 22, 1944 

Colonel W. P. Corderman, 

Chief Signal Security Agency, 

Room 30-340 

Pentagon Building. 

My dear Colonel Corderman: 

We have very urgent need for cipher machines at 

Madrid, Spain and Istanbul, Turkey. I understand 

th&t the War Department has four machines wired for 

this Deportment and reedy to be turned over. rr the 

nar Department has no objection this Department would 

like to send two of these machines to Madrid. 

Will you kindly advise me if the War Department is agreeable to this procedure. 

• Very truly yours,/}' _ 

))~4.~. 

Special ~onsultant 

to the Assistant becretary, Mr. Shaw. 

X-nrFatZNCE Fll~D IN: l

. X-llEFERC:NCEF'l-~ ~:· 

1.~ ~-t 1. ---------------- 1. :.. ~- il!. ---. --. ------.. -

" · ~-( ~ -----------------.. I , . -0: -~ :i.-r: ...... -------.. -

3. .lh.-:~ ~ !: .4. - - - - - - .... - -d ' ---.. --.. ------------ -. .-.-.-..------ __..._.... -- -

pproved for Release by NSA on 04-08-2014 

.0. 13526
EXHIBIT 8



SUBSIDIARIES



The following are our significant subsidiaries, as that term is defined by applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|Company Name           |  | Country ofIncorporation |  | Proportionof OwnershipInterest (1)
|---------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Smedvig Rig AS         |  | Norway                  |  | 100%                              
|Smedvig Offshore AS    |  | Norway                  |  | 100%                              
|Smedvig Drillship I AS |  | Norway                  |  | 100%                              
|AS Smedvig Prodrill    |  | Norway                  |  | 100%                              
|Smedvig Asia Ltd       |  | Hong Kong               |  | 100%                              



|(1) |  | Ownership percentage reflects proportion of voting power.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 12(a)

                             XEROX CREDIT CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (In Millions)

                         Three Months Ended
                             March 31,          Year Ended December 31,

                            2000   1999     1999    1998   1997   1996   1995


Income before income taxes $  33  $  35    $ 180   $ 137  $ 123  $ 123  $ 119

Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense
     Xerox debt                9      8       32      23      3      5      6
     Other debt               58     58      211     217    214    199    213
       Total fixed charges    67     66      243     240    217    204    219

Earnings available for
  fixed charges            $ 100  $ 101    $ 423   $ 377  $ 340  $ 327  $ 338

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges (1)         1.49   1.53     1.74    1.57   1.57   1.60   1.54


(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing
     total earnings available for fixed charges by total fixed charges.































(13)
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Dotronix, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for thefiscal quarter ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William S. Sadler,President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Dotronix, Inc. and will beretained by Dotronix, Inc and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request

 
|   | /s/ William  S. Sadler                                    |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | William S.  Sadler  Chief Executive Officer  May 14, 2003 |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED JUNE
30, 1999, THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE 12 MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          16,199
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,885
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     17,704
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                51,299
<PP&E>                                           4,657
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  56,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,030
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    56,230
<SALES>                                         92,227
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                92,227
<CGS>                                           64,336
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,277
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (810)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,581
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,599
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,982
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,982
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37


</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8080** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RAYMOND DOUGLAS MASSENBURG, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:97

- cr - 00003

- REP

- 1 )

Submitted : May 20, 2010 Decided: May 25, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curi am opinion
. Raymond Douglas Massenburg, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephen David Schiller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Raymond D ouglas Massenburg, Jr., appeals the district
court ’ s order denying his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for reconsideration of his sentence . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by t he district court. United States v. Massenburg , No. 3:97

- cr - 00003

- REP

- 1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 2009)
. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not ai d the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of T.N.S., a child, * From the 326th District Court

of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 8506-CX.

No. 11-16-00318-CV * November 17, 2016

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.)

 This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that the 

appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance 

with this court’s opinion, the appeal is dismissed.
### Record of Di s cussion D oc ket No. F AA - Dir ec t o r ate Id e n t i fie r : -A D 

### With whom outside the FAA has this action been discussed (i . e. , Design Approval Holder, manufacturer , ATA, NBAA , RAA , AOPA , ALPA, GAMA, etc)?

ORGAN IZATION PER SON C O NTACT E D DA TE T OPI CS DI SCUSSE D 

### L oc kh eed Mart in G eof B ate m an 

### 8/ 1 3/ 1 3 Co n c u

r.

O th e r / Ad d i ti o n a l In fo nn a ti on:



### 1 2
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements  on Form S-8 (Nos.  333-20235,  333-20237,  333-20241,  333-23161 and
333-86698) and on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-110885, 333-48762, 333-77077 and 333-47619)
of Vertrue  Incorporated  of our report dated September 12, 2005 relating to the
consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule, management's
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
New York, New York
September 12, 2005
EXHIBIT 13.2


CERTIFICATION




PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Tanir Horn, as Chief Financial Officer of On Track Innovations Ltd. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:




(1)           the accompanying annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: March 31, 2010
By:
/s/ Tanir HornTanir HornChief Financial Officer of the Company
|   | 1. | The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Periodic Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                                                   |   |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
| /S/    BRUCE J. HABER        Bruce J. HaberPrincipal Executive Officer     |
|                                                                                                                                   |
| /S/    WILLIAM M. MCKAY        William M. McKayPrincipal Financial Officer |

| (1) | This certification accompanies the Annual Report on Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Emergent Group Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Emergent Group Inc. and will be retained by Emergent Group Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
•. REF ID:A7174a 

~AVSECU.RITYSTA V/ASJOr 

FRO~.l: SUSLO LONDON ¢21~35Z 

TO: USCIB COORDINATOR 

fw6=P S E 0 R E=T 

SECURITY INFORMATION 

~2 JAN 52/CAC/ulf\ 

ROUTINE 

s 51643 

KINGS NEW YEARS HONORS RECIPIENTS tNCLUDE FOLLOWING GCHQ 

PERSONNEL: cm.1~1ANDER OF THE ORDER 

OF THE BRITISH E~PIRE (CBE); ....___ ______ ............... OFFICER 

ORDER OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE (OBE); I 

...___---;:::==============~----. 

MEMBER ORDER OF THE BRITISM EMPIRE 0.lBE);J ___________ _ 

BRITISH Er.1PIRE r.1EDAL (BE~1) " 

ACTION: AFSA-123(15) __ 

AFSA~133B(1) __ 

~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED • . CO rJSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE lECLASS I FY I NG. 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 03-05-2014
**** 

**Exhibit 31.1**

** **

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Eldad Eilam, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of hopTo Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

/s/ ELDAD EILAM

Eldad Eilam

Chief Executive Officer

April 30, 2014
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 239 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 239

To permanently enact certain appropriations Act restrictions on the use 
 of funds for abortions and involuntary sterilizations, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 2021

 Mr. Risch (for himself, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Young, Mr. Cruz, and Mr. Paul) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To permanently enact certain appropriations Act restrictions on the use 
 of funds for abortions and involuntary sterilizations, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Values Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT ENACTMENT OF CERTAIN GENERAL PROVISIONS.

    (a) Foreign Assistance Act of 1961.--Section 104(f) of the Foreign 
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2151b(f)) is amended to read as 
follows:
    ``(f) Prohibition on Use of Funds for Abortions and Involuntary 
Sterilizations.--None of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
otherwise made available to carry out this Act may be made available--
            ``(1) to pay for the performance of abortions as a method 
        of family planning or to motivate or coerce any person to 
        practice abortions;
            ``(2) to pay for the performance of involuntary 
        sterilization as a method of family planning or to coerce or 
        provide any financial incentive to any person to undergo 
        sterilizations;
            ``(3) to pay for biomedical research which relates in whole 
        or in part, to methods of, or the performance of, abortions or 
        involuntary sterilization as a means of family planning;
            ``(4) to lobby for or against abortion; or
            ``(5) to any organization or program which, as determined 
        by the President, supports or participates in the management of 
        a program of coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization.''.
    (b) Peace Corps Act.--Section 301(b) of the Peace Corps Act (22 
U.S.C. 2501a(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(3) Subject to section 614 of the Financial Services and General 
Government Appropriations Act, 2014 (division E of Public Law 113-76; 
128 Stat. 227), none of the funds authorized to be appropriated or 
otherwise made available to carry out this Act may be used to pay for 
abortions.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Stebbins, Respondent, vs. Killeen, Appellant.

*March 26*

*April 12, 1887.*

*Appeal: Evidence to sustain verdict.*

Where a judgment rendered in justice’s court upon the verdict of a jury is affirmed by the circuit court without a trial *de novo,*this court will not reverse the judgment if the evidence tended to support it and the credibility of witnesses was in question.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Kenosha*County.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Myron A.*Balter, attorney, and *Howard, Van*Wyak, of counsel, and for the respondent on that of *Charles Quarles.*

ObtoN, J.

The respondent brought this suit against- the appellant, in a justice’s court, to recover the sum of $8.50, of which sum $5.50 was for goods sold and delivered, and $3 was for legal and professional advice. The defendant answered, in effect, that the goods were sold to him to apply on an account which he had against the firm of Brown & Gaffrey, the former owners of the stock of goods finally sold to the plaintiff, and that the plaintiff had assumed to pay it, and that he never had such legal advice. The issues were tried by a jury, and they found for the plaintiff $2.50. From the *683judgment of the justice thereon, the defendant appealed to the circuit court and said judgment was affirmed. Erom said judgment of the circuit court, the defendant appealed to this court. No errors are assigned except that said judgment is against the law and evidence. In such a case the judgment will not be reversed if the plaintiff’s evidence tended to support it *(Lyle v.*Dellinger, 54 Wis. 404); or when the evidence was sufficient to sustain it *(Rood v. Am. Exp. Co.*46 Wis. 639); or when the questions of fact were fairly submitted to a jury upon conflicting evidence *(Chamberlain v.*Dickey, 31 Wis. 68; *Jaquish v.*Ithaca, 36 Wis. 108; *Caswell v.*C. *& N.*W. *R. Co.*42 Wis. 193).

In this case, the evidence on behalf of the plaintiff, if it had not been contradicted or rebutted by the defendant, was sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to recover; that is sufficient for affirming the judgment. The evidence was very conflicting, and the credibility of the witness was in question, and it was peculiarly a case for a jury, and their verdict is conclusive.

We think the circuit court committed no error in affirming the judgment of the justice, and therefore the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

*By the*Oourt.— Judgment affirmed.