alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: APPOINTMENT TO MINOR

JUDICIARY EDUCATION BOARD 

:

:

:

NO. 385

MAGISTERIAL RULES DOCKET

 O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2015, Magisterial District Judge Henry J. 

Schireson, Montgomery County, is hereby appointed as a member of the Minor 

Judiciary Education Board for a term commencing July 1, 2015.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
        (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections
(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I,
John W. Elias, Chief Executive Officer of Edge Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

         (1)      the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
                  December 31, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Dated: October 17, 2003                  /s/ John W. Elias
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Name:  John W. Elias
                                                Chief Executive Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

AMY SARGENT,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D16-3992

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Hernando County,

Stephen E. Toner, Jr., Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and 

Robert Jackson Pearce III, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Kaylee D. Tatman, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Amy Sargent, entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charge of 

criminal mischief (a third-degree felony) pursuant to a plea agreement. She was 

represented by counsel at the time of the plea. She was sentenced to three years’

probation. A few days later, Sargent filed a facially insufficient, pro se motion to withdraw 
2

her plea. At the time the motion was filed, Sargent was still represented by counsel. See

Escobar v. State, 126 So. 3d 277, 279 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (“[C]ounsel’s obligation of 

representation to his client does not end upon the rendition of a judgment of conviction 

and sentence, but continues thereafter until either a notice of appeal is filed . . . the time 

for filing the notice has passed, or good cause is shown upon written motion.”). The trial 

court held a hearing and denied the motion. Sargent’s counsel did not attend the hearing.

Sargent appeals, contending that her constitutional right to counsel was violated 

when the hearing was held without her counsel being present. We conclude that the trial 

court should have stricken the motion because Sargent was represented by counsel and 

the motion did not allege an adversarial relationship with her counsel. Moreover, the 

motion did not contain specific allegations that bring it within the ambit of Florida Rule of 

Appellate Procedure 9.140(b)(2)(A)(ii). See Escobar, 126 So. 3d at 279. Accordingly,

we reverse the order under review and remand this case to the trial court to enter an order 

striking the motion.

REVERSED; REMANDED with instructions.

SAWAYA, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
~ ,, 

OcStiP .3li.; risn. 

(l/16/34) 

Mr. David A. Salmon, 

Chl•t, D1viaion ot Communications 

and Records, 

Department of State, ~aehiqton, D. c. 

: --i . "' -..... ,. . .. ~:.. -~- '"::. .. _ .. ., ... .: .. 

' - ' 

........ J .. • "' ... .I "' ,..._ - - , ·~ .: - --• •"'.. L 

~ • .r·s1r1 -. . 

- ... _.. • ... -:1-.... 

Receipt ot your letter of Janu"U'y 16, l9J~, with 

re,ard to the construction or a new code, is acknowledged. 

The Chief Signal Officer will be ver,- glad to be 

ot e.s1iet.anoe 1n the devol.Olllllent of the nn code £or the 

u.ae ot the Dop11rtt:lent of Sti.te. H~ haa directed Mr • .Fried::u1n 

to ~aka pereonal_ contact w1th you in t.he natter and to turnish :rou with a Jlld.1-ble permutation tabl9 and euch ini"onu1.-

tion pertaining thereto aa •IV' ba necoaaary tor 7our requireaents. 

-·· _Vf!"J."1 trul,y 7ours, 

-~ - =G • .1 .. Van Deuaen, 

Major, SignGl Corps, lxocutive, 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 04-10-2014 pursuantto.E.O. 1352\3 

.... --

.. - - - ollS4 

-~ 

=- _ ~ _. ...... 

-- ., .. _,
REF ID:A67326 

dEBRET 9 

Statell .. ent of Cryptogra}'.hic Systeius now in use by Dep&.rt.i1ent of State. 

1. T 1e Depart...:..ent of State crypto3ra;..idc net is cou.posed 0£ 112 

.1.a,jor staLions (stations hold.in::; confio.c11tial or higher grade syeteu.s). 

2. T.,e ~ystei..s held c:1.re as follo·.,5: 

(a) SIG~ .. YC (secret): held. by London anci. -.~ashington. 

(b) .. ;avy EG ... (CSP 1127 - secret): :J,e.lci by ·:,aai1ington, ;,e;:ico City, 

?arw.u.a., Boe,ot:.:., Li ... .a, 5antiago, :t;ue1ios Aires, i.ontevideo, 

rt.l.O, 1 .. oscow. All stationo in t~;.is net holci. the sal!!El key 

lists, tterefore, '• ertical and lateral coi.1i.1unic<...tious are 

possible. 

(c) S~rip {secret): helu by all EmbaG&iea and L~g~tiona and ao~e 

Consulates. :3tri.tJ systerr.s an coL.posei.;. essentL.lly of 2 types, 

vertical and lateral. 'L.e old syste;:.a ciid uot use Caannel 

Elimination ru::.u the sar.:e set cf strif>s was soL..eti1ues held 

by 2 to 4 stations, however ne-.. syster .. s using Gnannel li:lin.1.ination and liniit6d to 2 hoh.ers are being distributc.d as fast 

as possible. The lateral systa.iZJ. will use Ghar:nel .;;1iwiri.ation 

beginning 1 Jam.ury 1944. T:.--.e lateral sys-t..en. chan.;es every 

month and the vertical syste~s chan~e in accordance with 

t:.e an.ouri-L of traffic. 

(d) A, :O, :ina C (e.11ci:pnereci cotle - confiuentlal): .0 and C are 

i1eld by all .Srr.bassies and Legations. n. is held by &.11 

Eir..ba:...oies, Le3ations and certain. :01;,sulates. .., ~ ar.tl C use13 

3 differc::mt 2-part codes with different cipher tubles for eac!1. 

(e) :CROWN (2-part code - 1·estricted): !1ela by all 1:11:.bassi~s, 

Legations and Consulates except 9 Ca.nadia..c1 Consul3.tes. This 

code is used in i;t;e unenciphered f or.r.. for nEJstrictecl traffic 

only. 

(f) G?..AY {one-part cocie - restricted): held by all State 

Department Off~ces. This is an old code and at the )resent 

time has very little use. 

3. The Departri.ent ,,,irepares all material used in t: .. e al::ove systems \"dth 

i;he followinr; exception: Strlpa are j}r.oto;;ra..t"hed L:,. i-..:avy De;iartILE::nt and .tJrinteU. 

by the Signal Security Age11cy. 

4. In aciaition to the aoove &.Il independent strip syster11 (cor.fidential) 

has been issued to 12 stations in Eurol'e, North Africa, and ChW'lgking for the 

use of the Federal .Econorr..ic li.diiJ.nistr.J.tior., War Shipping Adtinistration and ti1e 

uffice of Lend Lease A(il'Iiinistration. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

8ECRET
<PAGE>
DRAFT

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                    [BRANTLEY CAPITAL CORPORATION LETTERHEAD]



                                           April 1, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

Dear Sir or Madam:

     Brantley Capital Corporation (the "Company") has received a representation
letter from Arthur Andersen LLP ("Andersen") in connection with the issuance of
Andersen's audit report included in this Form 10-K. Andersen has represented to
us, by a letter dated April 1, 2002, that its audit of our financial statements
of the Company as of December 31, 2001, was subject to Andersen's quality
control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards and that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and appropriate availability of national office
consultation. The availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen
was not relevant to our audit, and, thus we received no assurance from Andersen
regarding such availability.

                                           Sincerely,

                                           /s/ Robert P. Pinkas
                                           Robert P. Pinkas
                                           Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Treasurer
REF ID:A675BB. 

CROSS IT~DEX SHEET 

File under i~o. Dudget Estimate & 

Requirements 

Type of Correspondence: T /S 

Date 8 Mar 48 

Sub,ject: Expendable Items .for Ar"!D.y Field Frinting Plants and 

Duplicating Units 

From: A8-24 

To: AS-80 

Classification: 

Synopsis: A yearly estimated requirements for expendable items £or Army Field Printing Plants are submitted. 

Document filed under ~·o. Print Plant 

VTDGAS F.::irm lJo. 67 (Rev. 1) 

26 September 1946 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 01-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 1.~ c.J I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         204,817
<SECURITIES>                                 2,782,790
<RECEIVABLES>                                  518,557
<ALLOWANCES>                                    18,951
<INVENTORY>                                     56,372
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,689,608
<PP&E>                                         687,746
<DEPRECIATION>                                 400,301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,731,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          418,603
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       104,165
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,163,907
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,731,675
<SALES>                                      1,781,781
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,181,278
<CGS>                                          703,606
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  703,606
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,239,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,727
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,596,203)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,596,203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,596,203)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)


</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2498 

To protect minors from premature waiver of their constitutional rights during 

a custodial interrogation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 28, 2021 

Mr. BOOKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To protect minors from premature waiver of their constitutional rights during a custodial interrogation, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Miranda 

5 Rights for Kids Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. WAIVER OF MIRANDA RIGHTS BY A MINOR. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 223 of title 18, United 

8 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 3051 

9 the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2498 IS

1 ‘‘§ 3501A. Custodial interrogation of a minor 

2 ‘‘(a) NOTIFICATION.—Except as provided in sub3 section (c), any law enforcement officer who has arrested 

4 a minor for a violation of law shall notify the minor’s par5 ent, guardian, or legal custodian that the minor has been 

6 arrested and shall provide the location of where the minor 

7 is being detained. 

8 ‘‘(b) WAIVER.—A minor who is subject to a custodial 

9 interrogation may only waive the privilege against self-in10 crimination or the right to assistance of legal counsel if 

11 the minor consults with legal counsel in person before such 

12 waiver. 

13 ‘‘(c) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply 

14 if— 

15 ‘‘(1) custodial interrogation of a minor is nec16 essary to gather information to protect the life of 

17 the minor or of another from an imminent threat; 

18 and 

19 ‘‘(2) the questions that were asked during the 

20 custodial interrogation were reasonably necessary to 

21 obtain such information. 

22 ‘‘(d) ASSIGNED COUNSEL.— 

23 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—A minor who is subject to 

24 a custodial interrogation shall have the right to have 

25 the legal counsel assigned to the minor’s case phys26 ically present during such interrogation. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2498 IS

1 ‘‘(2) VIOLATION.—In the case of custodial in2 terrogation of a minor, it shall be a violation of this 

3 subsection for the minor to be represented by any 

4 substitute counsel temporarily assigned to represent 

5 the minor. 

6 ‘‘(e) INADMISSIBLE.—In any criminal prosecution 

7 brought by the United States, any statement given by a 

8 minor during a custodial interrogation that does not com9 ply with this section, and any evidence derived from that 

10 statement, shall be inadmissible. 

11 ‘‘(f) MINOR DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

12 ‘minor’ means an individual who has not attained 18 years 

13 of age.’’. 

14 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

15 for chapter 223 of title 18, United States Code, is amend16 ed by inserting after the item relating to section 3501 the 

17 following item: 

‘‘3501A. Custodial interrogation of a minor.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2337 

To prohibit the imposition of mask mandates on public transportation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 14, 2021 

Mr. PAUL (for himself, Mr. BRAUN, Mr. COTTON, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. 

WICKER, and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, 

and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the imposition of mask mandates on public 

transportation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Travel Mask Mandate 

5 Repeal Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN MASK MANDATES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi8 sion of law, no Federal agency shall impose any Federal 

9 requirement related to COVID–19 that an individual wear 

10 a face mask when utilizing any conveyance (as defined in 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2337 IS

1 section 70.1 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, or 

2 any successor regulation) or transportation hub. 

3 (b) LIMITATION ON EXISTING ORDERS.—Effective 

4 on the date of enactment of this Act, the order issued on 

5 January 29, 2021, by the Centers for Disease Control and 

6 Prevention under section 361 of the Public Health Service 

7 Act (42 U.S.C. 264) establishing a requirement for per8 sons to wear masks while on conveyances and at transpor9 tation hubs, as well as any other related order, directive, 

10 and emergency amendment of the Transportation Security 

11 Administration (including those described in EA 1546– 

12 21–01A, SD 1542–21–01A, SD 1544–21–02A, SD 1582– 

13 84–21–01A, EA 1546–21–01, SD 1542–21–01, SD 

14 1544–21–02, and SD 1582/84–21–01) shall have no force 

15 or effect. 

Æ 


ctelli on DSK11ZRN23PROD with BILLS
# C_2015168EN.01000201.xml

| 22.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 May 2015

(2015/C 168/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1133 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,79 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4577 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,70990 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2613 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0394 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4330 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,351 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,97 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0959 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4490 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8611 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4112 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3600 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6322 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5239 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4875 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 218,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1113 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8980 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5398 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 620,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0123 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,433 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 55,2685 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,203 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3530 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,8999 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,8201 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1133

JPY

Japanese yen

134,79

DKK

Danish krone

7,4577

GBP

Pound sterling

0,70990

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2613

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0394

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4330

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,351

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,97

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0959

RON

Romanian leu

4,4490

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8611

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4112

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3600

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6322

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5239

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4875

KRW

South Korean won

1 218,13

ZAR

South African rand

13,1113

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8980

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5398

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 620,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0123

PHP

Philippine peso

49,433

RUB

Russian rouble

55,2685

THB

Thai baht

37,203

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3530

MXN

Mexican peso

16,8999

INR

Indian rupee

70,8201

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 16-10631

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:15-cr-20170-KMM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

RAUL SOSA,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(November 21, 2016)

Before MARCUS, FAY, and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges.

Case: 16-10631 Date Filed: 11/21/2016 Page: 1 of 3 
2

PER CURIAM: 

Raul Sosa (“Sosa”) appeals his total 78-month sentence imposed after the jury 

found him guilty of conspiracy to defraud the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 371, making and subscribing a false 2007 individual tax return in violation of 26 

U.S.C. § 7206(1), aiding and assisting in the preparation of a false 2008 corporate 

tax return in violation of § 7206(2), and making and subscribing a false 2008 

individual tax return in violation of § 7206(1).

Briefly stated, the appeal presents two issues:

(1) Whether the district court erred by applying a guidelines 

enhancement for obstruction of justice under U.S.S.G. § 3C1.1

(2) Whether the district court imposed an unreasonable sentence 

when it heavily weighed criminal history to vary upward from 

the guidelines range

The district court properly gave a two-level enhancement for obstruction of 

justice without “double-counting” Sosa’s criminal conduct: the indictment did not 

charge Sosa for filing false amended corporate returns, after he was told he was the 

subject of a criminal investigation. 

The district court imposed a procedurally reasonable sentence because it 

correctly calculated the adjusted base offense level for Sosa, considered the 18 

U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors, and adequately explained its sentence. The district court

Case: 16-10631 Date Filed: 11/21/2016 Page: 2 of 3 
3

also imposed a substantively reasonable sentence. The court considered the 

guidelines range, weighed the § 3553(a) factors in the light of the seriousness of the 

crime, considered Sosa’s particular conduct and lively criminal history, noted his 

lack of remorse, and considered the need to promote respect for the law and the need 

to deter Sosa and others. Given these considerations, the sentencing court did not 

abuse its discretion in determining it was appropriate to vary upward from the 

guidelines range. For background, see United States v. Osorio-Moreno, 814 F.3d 

1282, 1288 (11th Cir. 2016); United States v. Tome, 611 F.3d 1371, 1379 (11th Cir. 

2010); United States v. Clay, 483 F.3d 739, 743 (11th Cir. 2007). 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 16-10631 Date Filed: 11/21/2016 Page: 3 of 3
# C_2014447EN.01000101.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7414 — ReAssure/HSBC Life UK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 447/01)

On 5 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No. 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7414. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7414. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---