alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

JOE A. VANN, JR., Claimant

- Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 7119

______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in No. 13

- 0932, Judge Coral Wong Pietsch.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________

O R D E R

Joe A. Vann, Jr. moves for an extension of time to file his opening brief.

Upon consideration thereof:

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : Case: 14-7119 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 09/24/2014VANN v. MCDONALD 2

The motion is granted to the extent that Mr. Vann’s opening brief (form enclosed) is due on or before Nove mber 24, 2014

. F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

s21 Case: 14-7119 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 09/24/2014
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM AUDITED
ANNUAL REPORT BY CPA FOR FORSYTH BANCSHARES, INC. FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       1,786,751
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,010,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 10,769,935
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,961,417
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     18,564,894
<ALLOWANCE>                                    235,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              38,054,897
<DEPOSITS>                                  30,345,597
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            198,157
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     7,960,341
<OTHER-SE>                                      50,992
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              38,054,897
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                973,537
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              527,999
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               408,363
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             1,909,899
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             854,227
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             861,219
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,048,680
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  235,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,000
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,185,592
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (321,820)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (321,820)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (321,820)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.40)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.85
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              235,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        235,000


</TABLE>
# C_2014260EN.01000901.xml

| 9.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/9

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

8 August 2014

2014/C 260/09

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3388 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,45 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4550 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79670 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2440 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2137 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3600 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,825 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,72 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2010 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4435 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8920 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4419 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4614 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3772 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5791 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6751 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 381,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,3352 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2446 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6470 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 766,43 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2843 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,876 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,5790 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,022 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0632 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7284 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,9212 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3388

JPY

Japanese yen

136,45

DKK

Danish krone

7,4550

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79670

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2440

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2137

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3600

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,825

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,72

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2010

RON

Romanian leu

4,4435

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8920

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4419

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4614

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3772

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5791

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6751

KRW

South Korean won

1 381,25

ZAR

South African rand

14,3352

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2446

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6470

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 766,43

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2843

PHP

Philippine peso

58,876

RUB

Russian rouble

48,5790

THB

Thai baht

43,022

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0632

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7284

INR

Indian rupee

81,9212

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# Four th Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 28, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00861

- CR & 04

- 18

- 00862

- CR

Juan ORTIZ, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR7171

, 2018CR0457 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Pres iding



### O R D E R

On October 24, 2019, appellee filed its brief in this appeal

. Appellee’s brief violates Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.10 in that the brief includes sensitive data, specifically the name of a person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed, and such data has not been redacted to protect the minor’s identity. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 9.10.

W e therefore ORDER that appellee’s brief is STRICKEN

. We further ORDER appell ee to file an amended brief in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9. 10 by

or before October 30 , 2019.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of th e said

court on this 28th day of October, 2019

.

___________________________________ LUZ ESTRADA

, Chief Deputy Clerk
Map produced by Daniel Kloch - June 2008GARDENMORRILLSIOUXBOX BUTTESHERIDANGRANTHOOKERCHERRYSCOTTS BLUFFBANNERKIMBALLCHEYENNEDEUELARTHURKEITHPERKINSCHASELOGANMcPHERSONCUSTERDAWSONHAYESFRONTIERGOSPERPHELPSBUFFALOLINCOLNKearney CanalDiversionNorth Platte NRDUpper Niobrara White NRDSouth Platte NRDUpper Republican NRDMiddle Republican NRDTwin Platte NRDUpper Loup NRDLower Loup NRDTri-Basin NRDCentral Platte NRD



# P

u m p k i n 

## s e 

# e 

# d C r e 

## e 

# k 

# N

o r t h 

# P l a 

# t 

# t e R i v e r P l a t t 

### e 

# R 

# i v 

# e 

# r

L o d g e p o l e C r e e k L a k e 

## M c C o n a u g h y0 20 40 60 80 1005 10 15MilesR42WR43WR44WR45WR46WR47WR48WR49WR50WR51WR52WR53WR54WR55WR56WR57WR58WR59WR32WR33WR34WR35WR36WR37WR38WR39WR40WR41WR29WR30WR31WR28WR27WR26WR25WR24WR23WR22WR21WR20WR19WR18W

T 1 2 N T 1 3 N T 1 4 N T 1 5 N T 1 6 N T 1 7 N T 1 8 N T 1 9 N T 2 0 N T 2 1 N T 2 2 N T 2 3 N T 2 4 N T 2 5 N T 2 6 N T 2 7 N T 2 8 N T 1 1 N T 1 0 N T 0 9 N T 0 8 N T 0 7 N T 0 6 N

S o u t h P l a t t e R i v e rThis map represents the geographic area within which it has beendetermined that surface water ishydrologically connected to ground water for thepurpose of designating the surface water resourceswithin the Platte River Basin above the Kearney CanalDiversion, the North Platte River Basin includingPumpkinseed Creek and the South Platte River Basin including Lodgepole Creek as overappropriated.Additional information regarding the designation can be found in the Order issued bythe Department of Natural Resources on September 15, 2004.Hydrologically ConnectedSurface and Ground WaterNatural Resources District (NRD) BoundariesCounty BoundariesTownship BoundariesMapping Section 

## ®Geographic Area Determined to Have Surface Water Hydrologically Connectedto Ground Water for the Purpose of Overappropriated DesignationDetermination made by the Department ofNatural Resources on September 15, 2004
# C_2015117EN.01000201.xml

| 11.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 117/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 117/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

10 April 2015

(2015/C 117/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0570 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 127,32 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4716 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72440 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3331 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0390 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6130 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,383 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 297,38 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0181 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4090 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7921 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3824 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3386 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,1919 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4059 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4439 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 157,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,7464 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,5626 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 665,33 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,8760 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 47,147 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 54,5370 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,415 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2639 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0487 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 65,9100 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0570

JPY

Japanese yen

127,32

DKK

Danish krone

7,4716

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72440

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3331

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0390

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6130

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,383

HUF

Hungarian forint

297,38

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0181

RON

Romanian leu

4,4090

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7921

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3824

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3386

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,1919

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4059

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4439

KRW

South Korean won

1 157,92

ZAR

South African rand

12,7464

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,5626

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 665,33

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,8760

PHP

Philippine peso

47,147

RUB

Russian rouble

54,5370

THB

Thai baht

34,415

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2639

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0487

INR

Indian rupee

65,9100

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 23**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors 

of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.:

 

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No.333-116759) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-29885, 333-81813, 333-54688 and 333-115871) on Form S-8 of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. of our report dated March 11, 2005, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Hungarian Telephone and CableCorp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004,and the related financial statements Schedules I and II which report appears in the December 31, 2004 annual report on Form 10-K of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. 

 

KPMG Hungaria Kft. 

 

Budapest, Hungary 

March 29, 2005
### Mike Coryell From: Sent: To: 

### Cc: Subject:
Mike
... Debbie Morford [debbie@optiblendindustries.com] Wednesday, April 03,201311:51 AM milesecon@midrivers.com 'Mike**And~rson'** EAS OptiBiend 

### t

## f3

Here is a short note. OptiBiend Industries would benefit from reestablishing air service from Miles City to Denver. Prior, the connections between Miles City and Denverfacilitated travel from Miles City to our otheroffices in Texas including our corporate office near Houston, TX. Having access to a major hub also allows travel between plants from MTand WY /UT and in 

### TX. With our new plant in Ohio, this would also benefitaccess. Currently ittakes two days oftraveljust to get here orthere with overnight likely in Billings and a rental car. This does not provide time efficiency noraccess needed. OptiBiend Industries would support and benefit should airservice be reestablished and maintained to Denver. I hope this is whatyou were looking for. Good luck Mike. Debbie Morford OptiBiend Industries Inc. 

### 2804 Valley Drive East Miles City, Montana 

### 59301 Office 

### (406)-234-5045 Fax 

### (406)-234-5046 debbie@optiblendindustries.com

1
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.1
                                                                    ------------

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Lawrence E. Kreider and Glenn P. Dickes or any of them, each acting alone, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for
him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with
the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (the "Form 10-K") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of
the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 8th
day of March,1999.


                                       /s/ RONALD O. PERELMAN
                                       ------------------------------
                                           RONALD O. PERELMAN
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10087 Summary Calendar

JAMES WILLIE DUKE, III, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JOHN GAUGE et al., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-2745-BD

- - - - - - - - - - January 13, 1999 Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * James Willie Duke, III (Duke), federal prisoner #24193-077, appeals the dismissal with prejudice of a claim filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Although Duke asserted numerous civil rights violations, on appeal he only raises two issues: 1) the district court should have appointed counsel to represent him; and 2) the district court abused its discretion by denying Duke’s request for a continuance. First, Duke argues that the magistrate judge should haveNo. 98-10087 -2- appointed counsel because of the “severity of the complaint,” his inability to gain access to the law library, and his lack of knowledge regarding the law. Duke initially filed a motion for appointment of counsel, but then filed a motion requesting the withdrawal of the motion for appointment of counsel. There is no indication that Duke renewed his request for the appointment of counsel at the trial. Given this, the magistrate judge did not err by not appointing counsel. Indigents are not generally entitled to the appointment of counsel in § 1983 cases, and Duke has not demonstrated the existence of exceptional circumstances requiring the appointment of counsel. See Jackson v. Dallas Police Dept. , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). Next, Duke argues that the magistrate judge abused his discretion by not granting a continuance. See Johnston v. Harris County Flood Control Dist. , 869 F.2d 1565, 1570 (5th Cir. 1989)(holding that this court reviews a denial of a motion for continuance for abuse of discretion). As the magistrate judge determined in his order dated December 5, 1997, Duke had ample time to prepare his case. Moreover, Duke has failed to establish that he was seriously prejudiced by the magistrate judge’s decision. See United States v. Castro , 15 F.3d 417, 423 (5th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Correa-Ventura , 6 F.3d 1070, 1074 (5th Cir. 1993)(explaining that trial judges are granted broad discretion in ruling on motions for continuance). Accordingly, the magistrate judge’s order dismissing Duke’s case with prejudice is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         March 26, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on March 20, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Parcel Return Service Contract 6 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-41, CP2015-53.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-06881 Filed 3-25-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
DroneHoners plans to operate various small unmanned aircraft (UA), all weighing less than five 

pounds (for example, the 3DRobotics SOLO and the DJI Phantom 3 gross weight is approximately 3 

pounds). The quadcopters will operate on the 2.4GHz frequency band and be equipped with four 

rotors that are driven by electric motors powered by batteries. The UA will have a maximum airspeed 

of 30 knots. The UA may or may not include a small, lightweight camera such as a GoPro and will 

always be operated within visual line-of-sight and not within restricted airspace as established by the 

FAA. DroneHoners plans to operate the UA at locations near Lexington, Kentucky for the following 

purposes: UA flight training to new hobbyists to encourage safe and responsible operation of UAs as 

well as commercial aerial video and photography services.

DroneHoners will be committed to not only practicing safe operation, but also promoting and training 

others on the safe operation of UAs. DroneHoners will only operate in reasonably safe environments 

and will conduct extensive preflight inspections and protocols to ensure safety is our top priority. 

Given the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by

him, we believe an exemption from 14 CFR part 21, Subpart H (Airworthiness Certificates) and § 

91.203 (a) and (b) (Certifications required), subject to certain conditions and limitations, is warranted 

and meets the requirements for an equivalent level of safety under 14 CFR part 11 and Section 333 of 

P.L. 112-95 (Section 333).

DroneHoners is requesting an exemption from § 45.23 Marking of the aircraft because our UA will not 

have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain words or phrases. We also will not have 

the ability to add two-inch lettering on such a small aircraft. 

DroneHoners also is requesting an exemption from §§ 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2) 

and 91.417(a) and (b) Maintenance inspections may be required and should be granted since 

they only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. Please note that as a safety precaution, 

DroneHoners will perform a preflight inspection of our UAs before each flight.

DroneHoners requests an exemption from § 61.113 Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in 

command as we do not believe possessing a pilot license encompasses all the necessary skills to be 

a safe UA operator. We would add that the risks of operating a UA are far less than the risk levels 

inherent in the commercial activities outlined in 14 CFR part 61, et seq., thus we request an 

exemption from § 61.113.

Regarding UAS operational training, the operator of DroneHoners has extensive practice flying various 

UAs as a hobbyist and frequently practices using computerized simulated flights to maintain adequate 

skills and response reflex time.