alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LEMAR DEMETRIUS 

WHITFIELD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5875

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 15, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Jack M. Schemer, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glenna Joyce Reeves, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MAKAR, KELSEY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.37



                             NEWS CONVERTIBLE NOTES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Note no.                                         Principal amount       Conversion Price       No. of shares
--------                                         ----------------       ----------------       -------------   
<S>                                              <C>                    <C>                    <C>    
     1                                             1,100,000*                1.120                 982,143
     2                                             1,000,000*                1.300                 769,231
     3                                             1,000,000*                1.945                 514,139
     4                                             1,000,000                 1.945                 514,139
     5                                             2,500,000                 1.459               1,713,502
     6                                             1,500,000                 1.544                 971,503
                                                                                     Total       5,464,657
</TABLE>
NO. 07-11-0307-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

JANUARY 17, 2012

VELMA S. LOFLIN,  

	Appellant 

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,  

	Appellee

_____________________________

FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF HALE COUNTY;

NO. A15763-0410; HONORABLE ROBERT W. KINKAID JR., PRESIDING

***Anders Opinion***

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

	Appellant Velma S. Loflin was found guilty of theft after a plea of guilty and, in accordance with a plea bargain, sentenced to two years confinement, probated for five years.  The State later filed a motion to revoke her probation and, after a plea of true to the alleged violations, she was sentenced to two years confinement.  

	Appellant’s appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw, together with an *Anders[footnoteRef:1]*brief, wherein he certified that after diligently searching the record, he concluded that the appeal is without merit.  Along with his brief, appellate counsel attached a copy of a letter sent to appellant informing her of counsel’s belief that there was no reversible error and of appellant’s right to file a response or brief *pro se*.  By letter dated December 9, 2011, this court notified appellant of her right to tender her brief or response and set January 9, 2012, as the deadline to do so.  To date, appellant has filed neither a response, brief, or request for an extension.   [1:      Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744-45, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).] 

	In compliance with the principles enunciated in *Anders,*appellate counsel discussed his review of the original plea proceedings, an order extending appellant’s community supervision, the sufficency of the evidence to support the revocation of appellant’s probation, the punishment assessed, and the time credited to appellant’s sentence.  Counsel also explained why he found no error with respect to these matters.  	We have additionally conducted our own review of the record to assess the accuracy of appellate counsel’s conclusions and to uncover any reversible error pursuant to *Stafford v. State,*813 S.W.3d 503 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).  Our own review has failed to reveal reversible error.  

	Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is granted and the judgment is affirmed. 

							Brian Quinn 

							Chief Justice

Do not publish.

2
# C_2014308EN.01000201.xml

| 11.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7291 — Versalis / Novamont)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 308/03

On 5 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7291. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7291. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
**Memorandum**

To: File From: Anita Lee, EPA Region IX Date: September 2, 2011 Subject: Telephone Voicemail from Elizabeth Bisbey - Kuehn, New Mexico Department of

the Environment , August 29, 2011 This memorandum summarizes the main point of a voicemail message from Elizabeth BisbeyKuehn, New Mexico Department of the Environment .  New Mexico Environment Department (NMED) applies in its em ission control cost estimates a tax rate of 6.2% on total capital investment to account for the gross receipts tax
# C_2015165EN.01000301.xml

| 20.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 May 2015

(2015/C 165/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1180 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,36 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4590 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72185 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3133 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0420 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3545 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,357 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,07 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0486 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4480 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8900 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4027 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3618 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,6668 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5103 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4885 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 219,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,2540 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,9384 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5330 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 690,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0207 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,862 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 55,2035 |
| THB | Thai baht | 37,375 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,3653 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9139 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 71,2153 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1180

JPY

Japanese yen

134,36

DKK

Danish krone

7,4590

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72185

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3133

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0420

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3545

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,357

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,07

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0486

RON

Romanian leu

4,4480

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8900

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4027

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3618

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,6668

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5103

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4885

KRW

South Korean won

1 219,29

ZAR

South African rand

13,2540

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,9384

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5330

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 690,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0207

PHP

Philippine peso

49,862

RUB

Russian rouble

55,2035

THB

Thai baht

37,375

BRL

Brazilian real

3,3653

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9139

INR

Indian rupee

71,2153

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

April 1, 2013

t0325

Order 

April 1, 2013

146247

JUDY HAZELTON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 146247

COA: 307024

Roscommon CC: 10-728915-NI

C.F. FICK AND SONS, INC., and FICK

OPERATING COMPANY a/k/a SUNNY SPOT,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 25, 2012 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

CAVANAGH, J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### L. Sherman & Son, Inc., Landlord, Appellant, *v.*Heitmin Garage, Inc., Tenant, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

November 23, 1937.

*Bernard Fliashnick,*for the appellant.

*Siegfried*Schoenbach, for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

In the absence of objection that this proceeding should have terminated in a final order, not in a judgment (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1430; *Dickinson*v. *Brown,*50 Misc. 640; *Seymour*v. *Hughes,*55 id. 248; *Altschuler*v. *Lipschitz,*113 N. Y. Supp. 1058), we think the defect in the form of the court’s determination may be deemed waived. That the judgment was entered upon appellant’s motion, respondent neglecting to complete the record, does not require dismissal of the appeal. *(Midtown Plottage Corp.*v. *Sullivan,*131 Misc. 473.)

*103While the facts in the record, showing a limitation of the term, did not warrant a final order for the tenant, in view of the issue tendered by the landlord on the trial as to the financial ability of the tenant to pay the July rent, and the tenant’s claim that the stipulation made in open court before the trial of this proceeding, relied upon by the landlord in its brief, did not apply to the September rent, we think the tenant should be given an opportunity to assert any rights claimed as growing out of the payment of the September rent.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with fifty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur. Present — Lydon, Levy and Frankenthaler, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1

                            GLOBUS GROWTH GROUP, INC.

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Globus Growth Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Stephen
E. Globus, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.


                                        By: /s/ Stephen E. Globus
                                            Stephen E. Globus
                                            Chief Executive Officer

July 20, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Globus Growth Group, Inc. and will be retained by Globus Growth
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
##### 



ENTITY
    
    JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATIONCorel Technologies Corp.
    
    OntarioCorel do Brasil Ltda.
    
    BrazilSoftquad Limited
    
    United KingdomCorel California Inc.
    
    CaliforniaCorel International Corp.
    
    BarbadosCorel Japan Ltd.
    
    JapanCorel SARL
    
    FranceCorel UK Limited
    
    United KingdomCorel Holdings US, LLC
    
    DelawareCorel GmbH
    
    GermanyCorel Corporation Limited
    
    IrelandCorel PTY Ltd.
    
    AustraliaCayman Limited Holdco
    
    Cayman IslandsWinZip Computing S.L.
    
    SpainWinZip International LLC
    
    DelawareWinZip Computing LP
    
    DelawareWinZip Holdings Spain S.L.
    
    SpainWinZip Computing LLC
    
    DelawareWinZip Holding SGPS, Lda.
    
    MadeiraCorel Holdings Corporation
    
    New BrunswickCorel Inc.
    
    DelawareMicrografx (Europe) AG
    
    SwitzerlandMicrografx Italia S.r.L.
    
    ItalyMicrografx Technology N.V.
    
    Netherlands AntillesMicrografx B.V.
    
    NetherlandsInterVideo, Inc.
    
    United StatesInterVideo Holdings Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsInterVideo International Ltd.
    
    Cayman IslandsInterVideo Japan, Inc.
    
    JapanInterVideo Digital Tech. Corp.
    
    TaiwanWin Sky Holdings Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsStrong Ace Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsInterVideo India Software Private Limited
    
    IndiaInterVideo Digital Tech. Co., Ltd.
    
    ChinaTalent Ease Invest. Ltd.
    
    British Virgin IslandsUlead Systems Inc.
    
    United StatesUlead Systems GmbH
    
    GermanyBeijing Ulead Systems, Inc.
    
    ChinaUlead Systems, Inc.
    
    ChinaUlead Systems, Inc.
    
    Netherlands
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.
Mail Code CC-502
P.0. Box 4333
Atlanta.  GA 30302
Tel (770) 352-5712



(logo)SUNTRUST



March 17, 1997



Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.
11000 Broken Land Parkway
Columbia, Maryland 21044-3562
Attention: Tracey Waldman



RE: OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

Dear Master Servicer:

The   undersigned   Officer   certifies   the  following  for  the  1996
fiscal year:

(A) I have reviewed the  activities and  performance of the Servicer  during the
preceding  fiscal  year  under  the  terms  of the  Servicing  Agreement,  Trust
Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer Guide and to
the best of these  Officers'  knowledge,  the Servicer has  fulfilled all of its
duties,  responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements  throughout such
year,  or if there has been a default or failure of the  servicer to perform any
of such duties,  responsibilities or obligations,  a description of each default
or failure and the nature and status  thereof has been  reported to Norwest Bank
Minnesota, N.A.;

(B) I have confirmed  that the Servicer is currently,  an approved FNMA or FHLMC
servicer in good standing;

(C) I have confirmed that the Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions  Insurance
Policy and any other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing  Agreement,
Trust Agreement,  Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or  Seller/Servicer  Guide
are in full force and effect;

(D) All premiums for each Hazard  Insurance  Policy,  Flood Insurance Policy (if
applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),  with respect
to each Mortgaged Property,  have been paid and that all such insurance policies
are in full force and effect;

(E) All real  estate  taxes,  governmental  assessments  and any other  expenses
accrued and due, that if not paid could result is a lien or  encumbrance  on any
Mortgaged  Property,  have been paid,  or if any such costs or expenses have not
been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the reason for the non-payment
has been reported to Norwest Bank Minnesota, N.A.;

(F) All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded; and

(G) All annual  reports of  Foreclosure  and  Abandonment  of Mortgage  Property
required per section 6050J and 6050P of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively,
have been prepared and filed.


Certified By:


/s/Rod Hartman  
Rod Hartman    First Vice President

3/17/97
Date


HARTMAN\NORBEST
# C_2014455EN.01000901.xml

| 18.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 455/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 455/9

---

Public holidays in 2015: EEA/EFTA States and EEA institutions

(2014/C 455/07)

| | Iceland | Liechtenstein | Norway | EFTA Surveillance Authority | EFTA Court |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 January | X | X | X | X | X |
| 2 January | | X | | X | |
| 6 January | | X | | | |
| 2 February | | X | | | |
| 17 February | | X | | | |
| 19 March | | X | | | |
| 2 April | X | | X | X | |
| 3 April | X | X | X | X | |
| 6 April | X | X | X | X | X |
| 23 April | X | | | | |
| 1 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 14 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 15 May | | | | X | |
| 17 May | | | X | | |
| 25 May | X | X | X | X | X |
| 4 June | | X | | | |
| 17 June | X | | | | |
| 23 June | | | | | X |
| 3 August | X | | | | |
| 15 August | | X | | | |
| 8 September | | X | | | |
| 1 November | | X | | | |
| 2 November | | | | X | |
| 8 December | | X | | | |
| 24 December | | | | X | |
| 25 December | X | X | X | X | X |
| 28 December | X | X | X | X | |
| 29 December | | | | X | |
| 30 December | | | | X | |
| 31 December | | X | | X | |

Iceland

Liechtenstein

Norway

EFTA Surveillance Authority

EFTA Court

1 January

X

X

X

X

X

2 January

X

X

6 January

X

2 February

X

17 February

X

19 March

X

2 April

X

X

X

3 April

X

X

X

X

6 April

X

X

X

X

X

23 April

X

1 May

X

X

X

X

X

14 May

X

X

X

X

X

15 May

X

17 May

X

25 May

X

X

X

X

X

4 June

X

17 June

X

23 June

X

3 August

X

15 August

X

8 September

X

1 November

X

2 November

X

8 December

X

24 December

X

25 December

X

X

X

X

X

28 December

X

X

X

X

29 December

X

30 December

X

31 December

X

X

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6773

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JEROME DANEK GLEATON, a/k/a Jerome Danek Gleatin, a/k/a Jerome 

Gleason, a/k/a Ronnie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:12-cr-00063-HEH-DJN-1; 3:13-cv-00434-HEH-DJN)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Danek Gleaton, Appellant Pro Se. Olivia L. Norman, OFFICE 

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Danek Gleaton seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial 

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment 

of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. 

McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 

U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on 

procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion 

states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Gleaton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 
3

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ASIA CORK INC. on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Yi Tong, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



May 15, 2009



|    |                                               | 
|--- | --------------------------------------------- | 
|By: | /s/ Yi Tong                                   | 
|    | Yi Tong, CFO and Principal Accounting Officer
#### Peterson, Appellant, vs. Baker, Garnishee, etc., Respondent.

*March 3*

March *22, 1887.*

*First Nat. Bank v. Baker, ante,*p. 442, followed.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Grcmford*County.

Eor the appellant there was a brief by *Brooks c& Butcher,*and oral argument by *Mr. BrooJcs.*

*John B. Wilson,*for the respondent.'

Cole, 0. J.

This case involves the same questions of law and fact as those presented in *First Nat. Bank v. Baker,*ante, p. 442, and must be ruled the same way.

*By the Cowd.*— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Biopharmaceuticals Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated
below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

1)   The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/ Zhang Jian
                                       --------------
                                       Zhang Jian
                                       Chairwoman and Chief Financial Officer
                                       November 14, 2008