alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I, 

REF, ID:A65658 

.. , 

9 Jla.zrab. l9S8 . 

' .. 

": .. 

Dear Joe, 

We spent a:b:~ almost seven. weeks in Yuaata.zi. md a 

tn days in Florida.I just gettixlg ba.ok last Sun.day. · ·· . 

FOUlld your nice letter of 14 ·Jan.U&.17 and .aakecl Dr. 

Leibler lf he'd ·raoeiTed aeythillg from you..· li.ega.ti'n• 

Bave you ~ent · ~ng and if so. wh~ and 1?o .wh0m?. . · 

Cordial greetiDaB•· · 

Sincerely,, ·. ' . 

P.s. Look in the 11h.lk. ot the !Ollllu section ~f the : 

22 Fe°bl'11UT issue .of the ·m;w YORKER. whRe.~'11 , t:\nd a. m.~e p1eoe about 01l1" boot. I 

W .. F. lJ';leclwn 

31.0 S~Olld .strotit• S.:i3 .. 

~s.»..c.., 

·.· ~"' . . 

- ~ . .. . . : 

... i • 

. . 

- !:' ~ 

I ,•o '> "' 

' . 

. @'pp roved for Release by NSA on os-'22~:2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a· :· • .t, ... 

·. 

,\ 

. ...... 

, . 

. - .. _ - :·
EXHIBIT 12 (a)

<TABLE>
                                                    METRIS COMPANIES INC.

                                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                                    (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)



                                                                       Year Ended December 31,

                                                             2000       1999       1998       1997        1996
                                                             ----       ----       ----       ----        ----



<S>                                                       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
Earnings before income taxes, extraordinary loss
     and cumulative effect of accounting change: (1) ...   $322,911   $191,316   $ 93,248   $ 61,883    $ 32,546

Fixed Charges: (1)

     Interest on indebtedness, and
        amortization of debt expense ...................    133,006     55,841     30,513     11,951       4,106

     Interest factor of rental expense .................      6,023      3,706      2,134      1,313         378
                                                           --------   --------   --------   --------    --------
     Total fixed charges ...............................    139,029     59,547     32,647     13,264       4,484

                                                           --------   --------   --------   --------    --------
Total available earnings ...............................   $461,940   $250,863   $125,895   $ 75,147    $ 37,030
                                                           ========   ========   ========   ========    ========



Ratio of earnings to fixed charges .....................       3.32       4.21       3.86       5.67        8.26

(1)   As defined in Item 503(d) of Regulation S-K.

</TABLE>
# CA2014342EN.01000301.xml

| 1.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 342/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 342/3

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 342 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 293 | (NL) |
| 295 | (MT) |
| 297 | |
| 299 | |
| 304 | |
| 321 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 325 | (SL) |
| 332 | |
| 334 | |
| 340 | |
| 342 | (EN) |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

293

(NL)

295

(MT)

297

299

304

321

(DE/EN/FR)

325

(SL)

332

334

340

342

(EN)

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       5,500,807
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      13,499,259
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            26,740,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      13,499,259
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     54,110,592
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,318,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             120,400,465
<DEPOSITS>                                 105,173,299
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,358,855
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,721,630
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,146,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             120,400,465
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,637,926
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,777,387
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             6,415,313
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,622,908
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,622,908
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,792,405
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  100,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,828,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,264,204
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,264,204
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,316,048
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        406
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,238,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   51,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    31,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,318,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,318,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Director Compensation Arrangements (approved June 14, 2011)



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Director Compensation Arrangements 
 Approved June 14, 2011

 In June 2011, the Board of Directors of Radiant Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) approved the following
compensation package for the non-employee members of the Board of Directors and its committees. 
 Cash Compensation 

Each non-employee director of the Company will be paid an annual retainer of $40,000. A $20,000 annual retainer will be paid to the Audit
Committee Chairman; a $15,000 annual retainer will be paid to the Compensation Committee Chairman; and a $5,000 annual retainer will be paid to the Chairman of any other committee. An annual retainer of $10,000 will be paid to each Audit Committee
member (other than the Chairman) and an annual retainer of $5,000 will be paid to each Compensation Committee member (other than the Chairman). All annual cash retainers shall be paid ratably on a quarterly basis. 

Equity Awards 

Non-employee directors will be granted an annual equity award with a total grant value of $100,000, 100% of which will be in the form of
shares of time-based restricted stock, on the last business day of the fiscal year. The restricted common stock award will vest 100% on the twelve month anniversary of the date of grant. 

The respective number of shares of restricted stock awarded will be determined based on the average closing price of the Company’s
common stock for the 30 calendar days up to and including the date of grant. 
 New Director Option Grant 

New non-employee directors of the Company receive a one-time grant of an option to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company’s common
stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant, which option vests over a period of three years and expires, unless previously exercised or terminated, seven years from the date of grant.
(March 16, 2004)

#### Eudina Boodie, Appellant, v Town Hall Foundation, Respondent.

[773 NYS2d 282]

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Betty Owen Stinson, J.), entered July 23, 2003, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant demonstrated that the premises were not in violation of any aspect of the Building Code as applicable to defendant’s landmark theater, which was constructed well before the promulgation of the current regulations *(see Jones v Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y.,*3 AD3d 225, 228 [2004]); there was no evidence that the stairs on which plaintiff fell were not cleaned or properly maintained; and plaintiff admitted that she does not know what caused the accident. Defendant therefore made out a prima facie demonstration of entitlement to summary judgment, shifting the burden to plaintiff to demonstrate the existence of a material issue of fact by admissible evidence *(see Wright v South Nassau Communities Hosp.,*254 AD2d 277, 277-278 [1998]). Plaintiff offered only an affidavit of an expert, which, in the particular circumstances of this case, was insufficient *(compare June v Zikakis Chevrolet,*199 AD2d 907, 909 [1993]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.
Info:rma.1 Memorandum to M'r. Friedman. 

Subject: Action on "A Intelligence". 

9 lla7, 1945 

There are mal1J' things about the disposition of Ultra 

information relevant to Communications Securit7 which we 

believe should and could be rectified. A great volume ot 

intormation comes in through Jap Ultra messages, usuall7 termed 

"A Intelligence". Both the accurac7 and source of this 

information are seldom, if ever, determined. 

Current procedure is: 

1) An "A Intelligence" itlem is deciphered. 2) It deemed worthwhile, this information is 

transmitted to the SSO in the field. 

3) If it can be proven that a War Department approved s7stem is involved, Ccm:mrunications Securit7 

Branch takes the necess8l'7 action. 

4) If the system involved is not ascertained, the 

matter is dropped. (Thus far, the onl7 dample of 3 is the AAOS Px Code ) 

In other words, the usual outcome of "A Intelligence" is 

nothing. 

We believe that rather than statements such as "this ma7 

have been a message sent in K 209" a definite verification 

shoul4 be made. At present, the only agent for this action is 

the SSO 1 who seldom takes the t 1.me to follow these i tema through. We propose that, tor a trial period, the following procedure be adopted: l) Representatives with the specific function of 

tracing the source of "A Intelligence11 be assigned to 

the f'ield. 

2) The afore-mentioned Ultra information be transmitted 

to them through the sso. 

3) Action then be taken b7 these representatives. Ylere this ad.opted, we believe that after perhaps three 

months, proof could be given as to: 

1) The aocurac7 of "A IntelW.gence". 2) The source of this inf'ormation. 

3) The results of an7 theatre deception program in eftect. 

4) The general cryptographic practices now in use ~ which endanger seourit7 • . ~ ... * * ~,.-J-. q-:- These representatives should be men with a Securit7 rather 

.sr-· ?\ than MIS background, but would be under the sponsorship of MIS. 

Major Spitzer suggests that 7ou write a memorandum to this 

effect to Lt. Col. Huddleson, MIS, who would then take the 

matter up with the proper MIS authorities. We believe in this 

manner we might get positive action. 

Under an7 condition. we would like 

with 7ou. 

'2~ p "M. '""\ ... -""' 

Herbert H. Maass 

Capt., SC 

'1'9P SBSRB'P 

to discuss the matter 

1?,. A,A- Paul R. Reimers 

2nd Lt., SC 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID:A65543 

TO TO 

--- -- - --- .. - - -- --- - _,. ,.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated
February 5, 1996, which appears on page 53 of Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.'s
1995 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in Turner
Broadcasting System, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995 and which report has been incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997, in each of the
following:
 
          1. Registration Statement No. 333-11471 on Form S-4 for Time Warner
             Inc. (formerly named TW Inc.);
 
          2. Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.
             333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8 of Time Warner Inc.;
 
          3. Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement No.
             333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8 of Time Warner Inc.;
 
          4. Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No.
             333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8 of Time Warner Inc.;
 
          5. Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No.
             333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8 of Time Warner Inc.;
 
          6. Post-Effective Amendment No. 5 to Registration Statement No.
             333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8 of Time Warner Inc.;
 
          7. Registration Statement on Form S-8 and Post-Effective Amendment
             No. 1 (Registration No. 333-14053) of Time Warner Inc.;
 
          8. Registration Statement No. 333-14611 on Form S-3 of Time Warner
             Inc.;
 
          9. Registration Statement No. 333-27265 on Form S-8 of Time Warner
             Inc.;
 
         10. Registration Statement No. 333-39647 on Form S-3 of Time Warner
             Inc.;
 
         11. Registration Statement No. 333-44255 on Form S-3 of Time Warner
             Inc. (and Registration No. 333-44255-01 of Turner Broadcasting
             System, Inc. and Registration No. 333-44255-02 of Time Warner
             Companies, Inc.);
 
         12. Registration Statement No. 333-37827 on Form S-3 of Time Warner
             Inc. (and Registration No. 333-37827-01 of Time Warner Companies,
             Inc.) (prospectus also relates and constitutes a post-effective
             amendment to Registration No. 333-32813);
 
         13. Registration Statement No. 33-61497 on Form S-8 of Time Warner
             Companies, Inc.; and
 
         14. Registration Statement No. 333-45703 on Form S-4 of Time Warner
             Companies, Inc. (and Registration No. 333-45703-01 of Turner
             Broadcasting System, Inc. and Registration No. 333-45703-02
             of Time Warner Inc.).
 


PRICE WATERHOUSE LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 23, 1998


<PAGE>
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 0 9

- 4 0 8 7 8 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. H I G I N I O H E R N A N D E Z , a l s o k n o w n a s G i n o , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e E a s t e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o
. 4 : 0 8

- C R

- 1 7 7

- 1

B e f o r e K I N G , B E N A V I D E S , a n d P R A D O , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e a t t o r n e y a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t H i g i n i o H e r n a n d e z h a s m o v e d f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. H e r n a n d e z h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w

o f t h e r e c o r d , c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f , a n d H e r n a n d e z ’ s r e s p o n s e d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s e x c u s e d f r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Decem ber 8 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R
. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 09-40878 Document: 00511315779 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2010
~ ~. 

-~ 

-~· .. . :· 

21 June · 19S2 

. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

. ·aapt. J. s. Harper, USI PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Attns Mr. Aa w. Foley,, AFSA-2<2L 

3 •.. · The forego~ is submitted tor ;your intormtton .. and 

. you will be kept ilif'orlied ot any i'Urther develoPl*lts in these 

negotiations as they occur. · 

OGA I 

__ __ 

CCI D 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-20-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

(EncloSUl"e to Memo. for· Record dated 21 J~ 1952.)
M."!f t[I . "· '1.1.. ,_ 

53 Room ( ~a ~F ID .:_~7'l~~cil/mlr -\- hiper No •• 3. , .. \ 

1

• \ ) All communicntions respecting: tJ1is 

~~' 0EpARTM.E1\-.J F Co M MER b~- •··· , 0 neniml~'" wtioui.1 i:ivc the ~crial number, ' r' t- b 1 -· ij:l'~ato of tiling, nnd munc of 

.. 

,. ... __. Addrc•tr onl!J 

,.. 

• The Comm iss.ion4.~r of Patents. 

n.nd not any omcial by nnmc · UNITED STATES PJ\TENT OFFICE ..-'- "' thcupplic.aut 

RICHMOND 20, VIRGINIA 

Please find below a communication from the EXA.MlNE'R in 

charge of this application. {A) ~4' . . .... '"" ... 

GPO 10-mtrrJ ~Commissioner of Patcni3, Applicant: William F. Friedman 

William D. Hall 

c/o Chief Signal Officer 

Pentagon Bldg. 

Washington, D.c. 

References: ,, Hebern l,68fi,Ol2 Scherbius 1,588,6 0 : 

Korn 1,9.? ,028 

Morris' i.953,829 

Friedman 2 , 090 , ~b .. Friedman '2,139, 76 

Ser. No. 551,172 

Filed Aug. 25, 1944 

For AUTHENTICATING DEVICE 

Sept. 4, 1928 35-L+. 

May ll, 1926 tr 

Dec. 5, 193, u 

Apr. ~, 193 " 

May l , 1937 " 

Dec. 13, 193$ " 

An illustration of the mechanical set-up of the ~evice 

·~ 

;. 

is required, provided of course new matter is not introduced. 

Uere electrical diagrams are not considered sufficient. The claims· 

are all rejected as baaed on· an inadequate disclosure. 

Claim 2 is rejected as :failing to define the invention 

properly in the "means" of lines 7 and 8. In these lines "significance ,of energization" is not under3tood. If ~his means that 

the user may think o:f "9" for example as meaning one thing at one 

occasion of use, as for example a date albd at another an amount 

of money this is of ho patentable consequence, since like the 

same number used on an ordinary typewriter.or hand written it 

can mean whatever the user wants it to mean. I "means for varying 

·,.-. 

the significancen is a statement of function or purpose and ,..,,hateifer 

"varying the significa,tion" may mean the structure is not sufficiently 

set out in th~_urpose disclosed. rrhe claim is therefore further 

rejected. 

Cla:i.m 5 is rejected as indefinite in line 2 nor the like" 

a,nd is therefore rejected. 

Claims 1-5 all set out a series of switches and then 

another switch. Just what essential difference there is between any 

of the switches of a series and another switch is not seen. The 

l!\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-06-2013 pursu~~t to E.Q. 1352~ 
-·------------------------

REF ID:A67655 

. . ••• \,_j 

I 

' Serial No. 551,172 -2-

claims are rejected on Hebern in which the last switch in the 

cascade is "another switchn and the preceding switches are 

the rt series". 

T~e claims are all directed to a device of the character 

described and this is described as being an a.uthe:nticator. In 

what· re~pec t an authenticator Clif'fers from an_ ordinary 

crytcgraphic means such a.a Rebern' s is not stated and since 

Hebern' a device could be used f'or such s. purpose the claims 

are again reject~d as failing to define proper~y snd as 

unpatenta.ble over Eebern, and a.lso as un,Jatentable over any 

of the other devices cited. 

Examiner. 

I 

O' 

I 

I 

I 

I 

·i
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of CEO and CFO

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Shelter Properties III (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:





(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: November 19, 2007
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: November 19, 2007





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, as amended.