alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 10, 2016

No. 04-16-00358-CR

Scott E. COALWELL,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR10786

Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Kay Gittinger’s notification of late record is hereby noted. The reporter’s record is due

on November 30, 2016.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 10th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
November 20, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DENISE YVETTE POPE, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00647-CV V.

CYNTHIA LEONA SMITH AND DENRICK TYRONNE POPE, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on June 7, 2012. Having considered the motion and found it 

meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Denise Yvette Pope.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 23, 2016

s1116

Order 

Clerk

November 23, 2016

153154

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153154

COA: 321742

Wayne CC: 13-009768-FH

BLAKE KEVIN STOVER,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 17, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals, and we REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court to determine whether 

the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing 

procedure described in People v Lockridge, 498 Mich 358 (2015). On remand, the trial 

court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court 

determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional 

constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial 

court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the 

unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other 

respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining 

questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 21, 2016

No. 04-16-00531-CV

Yvonne OCANAS,

Appellant

v.

Jose J. OCANAS,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014-CI-18248

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record in this appeal was due October 6, 2016, but was not filed. On 

October 11, 2016, this court notified Luis Duran Jr. by letter that he is the court reporter 

responsible for timely filing the reporter’s record, and the record had not been filed.1 Our notice 

required Mr. Duran to file the record no later than November 10, 2016, unless appellant had 

failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the record and is not entitled to 

the record without paying the fee, in which case Mr. Duran was required to file a notice so 

advising the court no later than October 21, 2016. We received no response to our letter.

Accordingly, we ORDER Luis Duran Jr. to file the reporter’s record in this court on or 

before December 21, 2016. Mr. Duran is advised that if the record is not received by this date, 

we may order him to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt. We further 

order the clerk of this court to serve this order on Luis Duran Jr. by certified mail, return 

receipt requested, and by first class United States mail. Because “[t]he trial and appellate courts 

are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed,” see TEX .R. APP. P.

35.3(c), we also order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the trial court. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

 

1 We also advised court reporter Decline Benavides, by letter of the same date, that her portion of the record was 

overdue. In response, Ms. Benavides advised the court that the portion of the record she was responsible for has not 

been requested by appellant. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# C_2014185EN.01000101.xml

| 17.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 185/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 185/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

16 June 2014

(2014/C 185/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3532 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,81 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4571 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79740 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0005 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2176 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1190 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,438 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,51 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1425 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3963 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8979 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4426 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4724 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4893 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5611 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6927 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 380,77 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5266 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4248 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5805 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 999,04 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3650 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,436 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,9129 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,781 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0187 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6505 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,4220 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3532

JPY

Japanese yen

137,81

DKK

Danish krone

7,4571

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79740

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0005

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2176

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1190

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,438

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,51

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1425

RON

Romanian leu

4,3963

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8979

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4426

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4724

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4893

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5611

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6927

KRW

South Korean won

1 380,77

ZAR

South African rand

14,5266

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4248

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5805

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 999,04

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3650

PHP

Philippine peso

59,436

RUB

Russian rouble

46,9129

THB

Thai baht

43,781

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0187

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6505

INR

Indian rupee

81,4220

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6598

ANTHONY QUINTIN KELLY,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

LESLIE SIMPSON, Case Management Specialist; LIEUTENANT 

GEORGE B. MCALPINE; SERGEANT ROBERT WERNER; DEPARTMENT OF 

PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. 

(1:15-cv-03647-RDB)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Quentin Kelly, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith 

Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Quentin Kelly appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Kelly v. Simpson, No. 1:15-cv-03647-RDB (D. Md. Apr. 12, 

2016). We deny Kelly’s motions for default judgment and for a 

hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 12 (b)

<TABLE>
                                                             METRIS COMPANIES INC.

                                  COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS

                                                            (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)
                                                                                           Year Ended December 31,
                                                                                           -----------------------
                                                                              2000       1999       1998       1997        1996
                                                                              ----       ----       ----       ----        ----

<S>                                                                        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>
Earnings before income taxes, extraordinary loss and
     cumulative effect of accounting change: (1) ........................   $322,911   $191,316   $ 93,248   $ 61,883    $ 32,546

Preferred dividend requirement ..........................................   $ 31,624   $ 24,586   $  1,100   $     --    $     --
Ratio of earnings before tax expense to net income ......................       1.63       1.66       1.63         --          --
                                                                            --------   --------   --------   --------    --------
Preferred dividends (2) .................................................   $ 51,421   $ 40,773   $  1,789   $     --    $     --

Fixed Charges: (1)
     Interest on indebtedness, and
        amortization of debt expense ....................................    133,006     55,841     30,513     11,951       4,106
     Interest factor of rental expense ..................................      6,023      3,706      2,134      1,313         378
                                                                            --------   --------   --------   --------    --------
                                                                             139,029     59,547     32,647     13,264       4,484
     Total fixed charges and preferred dividends ........................    190,450    100,320     34,436     13,264       4,484
                                                                            --------   --------   --------   --------    --------
Total available earnings ................................................   $461,940   $250,863   $125,895   $ 75,147    $ 37,030
                                                                            ========   ========   ========   ========    ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends ..............       2.43       2.50       3.66       5.67        8.26

(1)   As defined in Item 503(d) of Regulation S-K.

(2)   The preferred dividends were increased to amounts representing the pretax
      earnings that would be required to cover such dividend requirements
</TABLE>
---

Exhibit 13.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Chai-Na-Ta Corp (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of such officers knowledge: (1)
     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company.
  /s/ WILMAN WONG
      
      /s/ TERRY LUCKName:
      Wilman Wong
      
      Name:
      Terry LuckTitle:
      Chief Executife Officer
      
      Title:
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      March 31, 2010
      
      Date:
      March 31, 2010


---
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Air T, Inc.
(the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 31, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results
of operations of the Company for such period.









Date:  february 12, 2004        /s/ Walter Clark
                              Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1






Certification
of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




Chip
Brian, President and Chief Executive Officer of Comtex News Network, Inc. (the
“Company”) certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has
reviewed the Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December
31, 2007 and that to the best of his knowledge:




1.
            the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.









February
      12, 2008
            /s/Chip
      BrianChip
      BrianPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
      Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
				  to 
			 Certificate Holders

			 Scheduled        Unscheduled                Ending
Class        Interest     Pricipal          Principal               Balance
<S>     <C>             <C>             <C>                  <C>
A1         961,396.37       141,678.72       492,855.54      39,277,965.74 
A2         939,756.35       166,035.57       577,585.33      38,295,879.10 
A3          70,122.00             0.00             0.00       2,901,600.00 
A4         285,155.14        34,254.04             0.00      11,778,045.95 
A5         120,830.84             0.00             0.00       4,754,000.00 
A6         193,333.32             0.00             0.00       8,000,000.00 
A7       2,404,574.86       288,844.50       903,961.25      98,557,194.25 
A8         157,083.32             0.00             0.00       6,500,000.00 
A9         119,794.16             0.00             0.00       4,957,000.00 
A10              0.00             0.00             0.00         246,000.00 
APO              0.00         7,837.13         8,817.20       2,325,169.63 
AR              19.08            78.57            21.43               0.00 
M          126,930.89        15,247.48             0.00       5,242,752.52 
B1          84,588.40        10,161.12             0.00       3,493,838.88 
B2          56,416.42         6,776.97             0.00       2,330,223.02 
B3          22,547.26         2,708.46             0.00         931,291.53 
B4          11,297.77         1,357.14             0.00         466,642.86 
B5          22,566.11         2,611.76             0.00         932,070.78     
Total    5,576,412.29       677,591.46     1,983,240.75  
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Exhibit 27.2, Restated Financial Data Sheet
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000351721
<NAME>                        Advanced Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             997,324
<SECURITIES>                                       896,018
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,782,095
<ALLOWANCES>                                       160,000
<INVENTORY>                                      2,848,344
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,776,216
<PP&E>                                           8,624,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,178,537
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  46,405,388
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,412,796
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           425,553
<OTHER-SE>                                      31,856,513
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    46,405,388
<SALES>                                         10,821,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,821,336
<CGS>                                            3,732,764
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,750,858
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (59,174)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 456,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    940,313
<INCOME-TAX>                                       375,335
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                564,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                     (55,998)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       508,980
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .06
        


</TABLE>
# C_2014135EN.01000101.xml

| 5.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 135/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 135/1

---

2014/C 135/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 129, 28.4.2014

OJ C 129, 28.4.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 112, 14.4.2014

OJ C 102, 7.4.2014

OJ C 93, 29.3.2014

OJ C 85, 22.3.2014

OJ C 78, 15.3.2014

OJ C 71, 8.3.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
Exhibit 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Corel Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
November 30, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

I, Derek Burney, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350,
as adopted pursuant
to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

February 18, 2003

|/s/ Derek Burney
|----------------

Derek Burney

President and Chief Executive Officer

I, W. Martin Catto, Executive Vice President, Finance and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
 1350, as adopted pursuant to  906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



February 18, 2003

|/s/ W. Martin Catto
|-------------------

W. Martin Catto

Executive Vice President, Finance and Interim Chief Financial Officer
REF ID:A.85489 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 
• 

• 

As regards work on diplomatic systems, the division of 

labor between the Army and the Navy was not made on any welldefined basis until some time in the autumn of 1940. For 

some time before then the technical people in each service 

attempted to intercept and process all the material they 

.could intercept and process with their own facilities. On •. ( ;- ,._ 

the technical level -there were excellent personal relations 

and a very good exchange of information and technical data, 

but one could almost say that the two services were on a 

competitive basis so far as the dissemination of the results 

of the cryptanalytic processing are concerned, the intelligence people of one service vieing with those of the other 

service in rushing to provide higher levels with translations 

of important messages, for the purpose of obtaining credit 

for their respective services. 

Because there was no clear-cut basis for division of 

interception and cryptanalytic processing, there was bound 

to be and there was a considerable amount of avoidable 

duplication of effort; and because there was no good working 

arrangement with regard to dissemination, there were bound 

to be and there were embarrassments from time to time to 

both services. 

Both of these disadvantages arising from the foregoing 

circumstances led to discussions between the two services and 

as a result of an arra~gement suggested by the Chief Signal 

Officer (Major General Mauborgne) and accepted by the Navy, 
REF 

after sometime in the autumn of 1940, September, I believe, 

the division of work was on the basis that the Army would 

process all messages bearing an even date in.the heading, 

the Navy would process all those bearing an odd date. Later 

this was clarified to apply to the internal or cryptographic 

date of the messages. The arrangement also provided that a 

complete exchange of technical data and translations would 

be made; and steps were also taken to reduce to a minimum all 

undesirable duplication in interception. Provision was also made 

to ins.ure the necessary exchange of raw material so that each 

service would have all the material for processing the traffic 

for the dates for which it was responsible. 

Dissemination agreements were also made but these are 

unknown or not clear to me. At one time I think the s8rvices 

alternated on a monthly basis in regard to dissemination to 

the State Department and to the White House, a G-2 representative 

carrying the translations to those places one month, and an 

ONI representative carrying them the next, alternately. 

WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN 

15 December 1945