alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015066EN.01000401.xml

| 24.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7465 — Arkema/Bostik)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 66/04)

On 28 January 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7465. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7465. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
SCPW-16-0000802

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

ARNOLD HIRAHARA, Petitioner,

vs.

THE HONORABLE HILARY BENSON GANGNES, Judge of the District Court

of the First Circuit, State of Hawai#i, Respondent Judge,

and

KAYLA M. MALSOL BRITT, Respondent.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(1SS16-1-001046)

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, J.J.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Arnold Hirahara’s

petition for writ of mandamus, filed on November 14, 2016, the

documents attached thereto and submitted in support thereof, and

the record, it appears that petitioner may submit his exhibits at

the hearing on the petition to enjoin and may seek relief, as

appropriate, in any subsequent appeal. Petitioner, therefore, is

not entitled to the requested writ of mandamus. See Kema v.

Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204-05, 982 P.2d 334, 338-39 (1999) (a

writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue

unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-16-0000802

21-NOV-2016

01:51 PM
to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately

the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action; where a court

has discretion to act, mandamus will not lie to interfere with or

control the exercise of that discretion, even when the judge has

acted erroneously, unless the judge has exceeded his or her

jurisdiction, has committed a flagrant and manifest abuse of

discretion, or has refused to act on a subject properly before

the court under circumstances in which he or she has a legal duty

to act). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of

mandamus is denied without prejudice. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, November 21, 2016. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2
# C_2014329EN.01000101.xml

| 22.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 329/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 329/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 329/01

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 315, 15.9.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 303, 8.9.2014

OJ C 292, 1.9.2014

OJ C 282, 25.8.2014

OJ C 261, 11.8.2014

OJ C 253, 4.8.2014

OJ C 245, 28.7.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
LETI'viALINTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTANAINRETHEPETITIONOFCONNLANW.WHYTEPR22-0004t.AUG292022BowenGreenwoodClert:ofSupremeCourtSUatenrKiinntanaORDERConnlanW.WhytehaspetitionedthisCourtforadrnissiontoactivestatusintheStateBarofMontanaafterhavingbeenoninactivestatussinceOctober2021.ITISORDEREDthatuponpaymentoftheappropriatefeestotheStateBarofMontana,PetitionershallbeadmittedtotheactivepracticeoflawinthestateofMontana.ITISFURTHERORDEREDthatPetitionerhasshownthatPetitioner'soccupationduringinactivestatusissufficienttowarrantadmissiontoactivestatuswithoutbeingrequiredtomakeupcontinuinglegaleducationrequirementsforthetimePetitionerwasoninactivestatus.TheClerkisdirectedtoprovidecopiesofthisOrdertoPetitionerandtotheStateBarofMontana.DATEDthisdayofAugust2022.FortheCourt,ByChiefJustice08/29/2022Case Number: PR 22-0004
EXHIBIT 13.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of China Technology Global Corporation (the
"Company")  on Form 20-F for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, ZHOU Li
Yang,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
       of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
       respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
       Company.




/s/ ZHOU Li Yang
----------------------------------------------
ZHOU Li Yang
Chief Financial Officer
Presidential Documents

13479 

Federal Register 

Vol. 80, No. 50 

Monday, March 16, 2015 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of March 4, 2015 

Delegation of Authority Pursuant to Section 1209(b)(2) of the 

National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 

Memorandum for the Secretary of State 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, 

United States Code, I hereby delegate the functions and authorities vested 

in the President by section 1209(b)(2) of the National Defense Authorization 

Act for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113–291) (the ‘‘Act’’) to the Secretary 

of State. 

Any reference in this memorandum to the Act shall be deemed to be a 

reference to any future Act that is the same or substantially the same 

as such provision. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, March 4, 2015 

[FR Doc. 2015–06068 

Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 4710–10 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with O0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 13876)    
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Special Emphasis Panel; NIMHD Academic Research Enhancement Award: Enhancing Health Disparities Research at Undergraduate Institutions (R15).                    

*Date:*                         April 13-14, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         4:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Rockville Hilton, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Maryline Laude-Sharp, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, 6707 Democracy Blvd., Suite 800, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 451-9536,                         *mlaudesharp@mail.nih.gov.*

Dated: March 11, 2015.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-06037 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06200]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XD831


Western Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) will 
hold a meeting of its Scientific and Statistical Committee (SSC) 
subcommittee to review and discuss the revisions of false killer whale 
stock boundaries and bycatch proration method for incidental take in 
the Hawaii longline fishery.

DATES: The SSC subcommittee meeting will be held on March 31, 2015 at 1 
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The SSC subcommittee meeting will be held at the Council 
office, 1164 Bishop Street, Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813; telephone: 
(808) 522-8220.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kitty M. Simonds, Executive Director; 
telephone: (808) 522-8220.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public comment opportunity will be provided. 
The order in which agenda items are addressed may change. The meetings 
will run as late as necessary to complete scheduled business.

Schedule and Agenda for the SSC Subcommittee Meeting

1. Welcome and Introductions
2. Approval of the Agenda
3. False Killer Whale Stock Boundary and Bycatch Proration
    A. Revised Stock Boundaries for False Killer Whales in Hawaiian 
Waters
    B. Revised Bycatch Proration
    C. Discussions
4. Public Comment
5. Discussion and Recommendations

Special Accommodations

    These meetings are physically accessible to people with 
disabilities. Requests for sign language interpretation or other 
auxiliary aids should be directed to Kitty M. Simonds, (808) 522-8220 
(voice) or (808) 522-8226 (fax), at least 5 days prior to the meeting 
date.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: March 13, 2015.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-06200 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
# C_2014381EN.01001301.xml

| 28.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/13

---

Special Report No 16/2014 ‘The effectiveness of blending regional investment facility grants with financial-institution loans to support EU external policies’

2014/C 381/08

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 16/2014 ‘The effectiveness of blending regional investment facility grants with financial-institution loans to support EU external policies’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeals of

-- ) ) Government Services Corp. ) ) Under Contract Nos. SP0600-11-D-4009 ) SP0600-13-D-4512 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA Nos. 59209, 59210, 59311 60255,60256
Gregory R. Rauch, Esq.

Magyar, Rauch, & Thie, PLLC Moscow, ID Daniel K. Poling, Esq.

DLA ChiefTrial Attorney Jared M. Miller, Esq. Kathryn M. Kelley, Esq.

Trial Attorneys DLA Energy Fort Belvoir, VA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The appeals have been settled. Accordingly, they are dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 5 October 2017

MICHAEL T. PAUL Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59209, 59210, 59311, 60255, 60256, Appeals ofGovernment Services Corp., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:
JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
# C_2015048EN.01000102.xml

| 11.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7401 — Blackstone/Alliance BV/Alliance Automotive Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 48/02)

On 26 November 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7401. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7401. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6810

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNETH EUGENE BARRON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CR-94-306-WMN, CA-96-3620-WMN)

Submitted: October 20, 1997 Decided: November 7, 1997

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Eugene Barron, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia,

United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Barron, Nos. CR-94-306-WMN; CA-96-3620-WMN

(D. Md. May 12, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
10Q

**EXHIBIT      32.8**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
99-1007.

#### Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Clapp & Affiliates Fin. Serv., Inc.

On May 26, 1999, movant, Cincinnati Bar Association, filed with this court a motion for an order to show cause why respondent should not be punished for contempt for his failure or refusal, without just cause or just excuse, to obey the commands of this court to appear in response to the subpoena *duces tecum*issued by the Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of Law and to produce the documents the production of which was ordered by the subpoena *duces tecum.*On June 7, 1999, respondent filed a response to movant’s motion and a motion to quash subpoena *duces tecum.*On June 17, 1999, movant filed a motion to strike respondent’s motion to quash and response to motion to show cause. On June 21, 1999,'respondent filed a motion for hearing on relator’s motion to show, cause. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court, effective August 11, 1999, that movant’s.motion for an order to show cause be, and hereby is, granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s motion to quash be, and hereby is, denied.

Cook, J., would strike the motion.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant’s motion to strike be, and hereby is, denied.

F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lündberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s motion for hearing be, and hereby is, denied.

Resnick and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
# C_2014211EN.01000101.xml

| 5.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7189 — Also/Alpha International)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 211/01)

On 22 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7189. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7189. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
fOP SE:GPE-0 

.H!MORANDUM FOR CDR. HALL1 

suanma 

REF 

80 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

In Bf/' op1.niGD tbe tJ.00,000. wuld be ..U .1p1111t. U w actu~ receive all tbe b..rtu oollteaplaW. s___., I avgpst 

tbat. .. init.ial ... ~or .......... azs.ooo. be paid Gil s!ptng t.119 

contnct.. to be toll.wed b7 ... t.•, or thne add1timaal p.qmmu 

of lib ...-. d.epmdiq upma ._t.a.r- a lldeal• with a ~ ~ 

ISO,ooo. or t7S,ooo, or t100.ooo •11.ld be nqu1n11 to .-te the Ual, 

am cont,j npnt. upaa ta1u.tul pertOl'llaDCe ot t.be oontno\• lnal\ldiJtl 

deliv117 

ot an .Amri.can 

of an aocep\ab1a 

t..ecbniAian 

whine 

t.o wl'k wit.h 

and 'the 

th• 

••t.we I of t.be t dUl'iDg ~ 

U. 

oonat.ruot.toa ot the llllllShine. 

eclassifi ed and approved for release by NSA on 07-03-2014 pursuant to 

.0. 13526
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ASHLEY GENNOCK AND JORDAN BUDAI, 

INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON 

BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED,

Respondents

v.

KIRKLAND'S INC.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 335 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior 

Court at No. 88 WDM 2020 entered 

on October 16, 2020, denying the 

Petition for Permission to Appeal 

from the Order of the Lawrence 

County Court of Common Pleas at 

No. 11119 of 2019 entered on 

August 20, 2020.

JORDAN BUDAI, ANDREA SCIOLA, AND 

ASHLEY GENNOCK, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY 

SITUATED,

Respondents

v.

COUNTRY FAIR, INC.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 336 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior 

Court at No. 89 WDM 2020 entered 

on October 16, 2020, denying the 

Petition for Permission to Appeal 

from the Order of the Lawrence 

County Court of Common Pleas at 

No. 10896 OF 2019 entered on 

August 20, 2020.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 29th day of December, 2021, the Petitions for Allowance of Appeal

are GRANTED, the orders of the Superior Court are VACATED, and the cases are 
[335 WAL 2020 and 336 WAL 2020] - 2

REMANDED to the Superior Court to provide its rationale for the denial of Petitioners’ 

petitions for permission to appeal.