alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014119EN.01000201.xml

| 23.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 119/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 119/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 April 2014

2014/C 119/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3855 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,57 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4664 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82430 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1091 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2175 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2824 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,502 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,73 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1937 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4633 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9552 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4822 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5253 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7437 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6093 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7316 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 439,30 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5893 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6149 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6245 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 822,52 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4861 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,439 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,7618 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,591 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1040 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0988 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,5820 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3855

JPY

Japanese yen

141,57

DKK

Danish krone

7,4664

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82430

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1091

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2175

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2824

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,502

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,73

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1937

RON

Romanian leu

4,4633

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9552

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4822

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5253

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7437

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6093

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7316

KRW

South Korean won

1 439,30

ZAR

South African rand

14,5893

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6149

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6245

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 822,52

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4861

PHP

Philippine peso

61,439

RUB

Russian rouble

49,7618

THB

Thai baht

44,591

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1040

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0988

INR

Indian rupee

83,5820

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
REF ID:A66604 

II f!Pll!! '! fl!PH # .fl!JCQ¥!?;2!! 

MJS,J'!l:Cl's ~1.,... ot l1atQF1' et the laTal CCRtl'J: Ogattt1«t 

~ the b-cen Cor.tnict 

f01 Diet ot ~ ~tlOti# (OP-20) 

--~ hh:c'dncet DliC l.tr (OP-2028), Mr· 000$~, 18 loY S3 

l.4 ? -. flee.1!!l!'tt to 1-:m tl'Olll ~ nt~e• '1Mf.t tlw poJo~ 

1Jtu4y at th$ u.a. CQII!lr .ttort ~tbs~ contit<f\-. rour ~· Ia Tiev flt the r.ct \bat lbe ~1e ~1" ot the 

-.;, ml .AU roree ewt Jr«P3rlre ~· or theu aJmi'? ~ttono 

.. ~ td...toriQ, 1t ~ '° - tl&t lt 1IO.ild - ~"'""~-!.a tor 

et the 

tho 

•tt7 

crn'°1og1c camtr ~ort. 14nq ttt 

~ 

\Mt ~ kt-1 '° 

attor4 ~ au\onoqf 

• ~bl• 

to the la.11)' 

~ 

ta 

~ 

tile &rt.end?latiOl'l ot tbe twm md ecutent at u .• b.tetor7• u. woul4 ..i..o 

tt# ettm":dey in the cecutton or tm ~ 07 ai1 tb:reO 

...... .lcia. 

a. I would lie sl&4 to ... 1st tM •VJ ill ~ng such o project. 

lat10fttl ~it)' ~ -~ would tan tho .fOftll el ~,nc aY&il• 

ate to u- ~or •..i ec , •mle&ttor.a (DIC) t.= ..-vl.cff ct 

Clluas~ E. V .. 8etQ' ud .. ZIO!:Oel ~ttt to Iida, d Wll U tbel 

illt"rteu d Ur.item...~ 1. •· tfMltn. tJadc tid• ~"'l!i:m:~t., ~er 

a.aa 'IOU1d. eotJter vt.th ~ •••• Clillet.pio &&Id. prcv14o tor tb9 

Mt.aUJI at: uvle:eweutatton. In "1• latter «mtte'!tion, ~ 1beQ 

¥OU14 W authorU«l to -.ke ~bo ftt'Tieel Gr OM et ~ •val Gt'tiea"a 

'll:m ,ut1a1.pated 1n tM 8"-y alittl'r ettort ill 'tM ~ theJJ:tctr •V\\tl• 

~ to 1*C QI). a hl.1.-tt. -.u u -..., '9e 19fiQ1"4· the otMt' l8A. 

,...ACl'lt);Ol conoor~1. voul.d. "9 &11t!loi'1ced to &n'oto ~J.ent tiDl w 

'1l!ll no~ to SNt.lro tmt thelr '"PfJc'tlve eqe.blli'ttes to coatl'Unrt.~ 

Wor:::tt1on an ~ eq1o1t..1. 

J• to.i:r CtOtlCU1"1'®ee 1A tM pl.an oatltftilld ta ~l\ I Cot-. ta ....... te-:1. 

~. It t.he plM .-t• Ylt.h ~ ~ ad " ~ to 

CO!!IJlett.on, l8A 1'0Ql4 Uu to bave 10 cop!.fta ot ti= l'C»Ott. 

-

--p-e-c 1-as-s--if-i e_d_a_n_.d =;=06 .... r--ov ...... e-d--f-or-r-el-e-as_e_b_y_N __ S ...... A ....... -on_0 __ 6 ...... _-1 9---2-01_4_p_u r-su_a_n_tt_o"""'"E"""'". o-. 1--3-5-2a 
CCI All c/s 

P/P 

JBOD( Cdr.. Adame) 

8/Nm (Mr.~) 

REF ID: A66604-

+oP sEcRET 

M/R1 :ta the nu-., -.val Co:awn1eat1om ltr (tt.s. SJ-3645) ot l8 lov, 

be concura in our req,ueet (DIRHSA ltr s.r. ~' 26 Aue) t=.t hD ~a at~ ot cc;mr;.:iun1cation iAtolllgenco c:gleX'ationa 4urbg tm ~ eotd"Uct. le .umeata tlat CdJ". D. W. 8-gy be authorhe4 to 

41rect the :project. Ve state that w will be .W to ... 1st tha •v.r 

With th1a Pl"OJect 'b,y •ktng avdlable car. Blao' & ~1 eubora.imte 

to h1a ad Lt. J, I. Jotsltn. Cctr. ~ ia to cccsta vith car. Olll.eapie 

• provide for 4eta1la of illtlAhttntation. We aak. CO?J.CUrnnee ot outlined 

}tlan ir1 par. i and, 1t the plu U concurred bl and is~ to CQll.11.etion 

w req,ue•t lO cop1ea ot the n.port.. ~ \;\, ~"'0 L ~~-J._..,. :Y ~~\ ~c.l ~
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 01, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 01, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16I0208. JOE ENTERPRISE, LLC, d/b/a IHOP RESTAURANT v. JANET KANE.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 14V441
# FILED
April 23, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT JA CKSON APRIL 1998 SESSION

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) C.C .A. NO. 02C 01-9 710-CR-0038 2 Appellee, ) ) SHELBY COUNTY VS. ) ) NO. 96-13311 Below AARO N L. DRUMMER, ) ) Appellant. ) RULE 20 ORDER

ORDER
The defendant, Aaron L. Drummer, pled g uilty to possession w ith intent to sell or deliver ten (10) pounds of marijuana, a Clas s E felony. He agreed to a sentence of one (1) year and a $3 ,000 fine, the manner of sentence to be determined by the trial c ourt. At the conclusion of the s entencing hearing, the trial court denied alternative sentencing. The defendant was immediately incarcerated. On appeal the defendant contends the tria l court erred in denyi ng alternative sentencing . However, it appear s to this Court that the defendant ha s been released from incarcerati on. The issue, therefore, is moot. See State v. Samuel D. Perry , C.C.A. No. 02C01-9611-C R-00435, Shelby County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed January 2 9, 1998, at Jackson); State v. Terry Moore , C.C.A. No. 02C01-9509-CC-00257, Madis on County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed August 2, 1996, at Jackson). It is, therefore, ORDERED that the judgment of the trial court is aff irmed in accordance with Rule 20 of the Tennessee Court of Crimina l Appeals. Costs are taxed to the State of Tennessee, as it appears the defendant is indigent

.2 _________________________ JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

CONCUR:

_________________________ DAVID G. HA

YES, JUDGE

_________________________ WILLIAM M. B

ARKER, JUDG E
ACCEPTED

03-15-00441-CV

6144191

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

7/20/2015 4:39:11 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/20/2015 4:39:11 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
March 23 , 2015

Mr. Barry Fisch

Flash It First

1872 Sparks Place

San Diego, CA 92110

Dear Mr. Fisch :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your January 8, 2015 exemption request on behalf of the Flash It First into the

public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0034 ) , but we are unable to process your request any further.

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed).

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific s ection or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

• The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you

seek an exemption.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed ef fective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2438 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 500
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2438

                          [Report No. 117-157]

  To modify the boundary of the Cane River Creole National Historical 
        Park in the State of Louisiana, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 22, 2021

  Mr. Cassidy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                           September 21, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, with an amendment
  [Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To modify the boundary of the Cane River Creole National Historical 
        Park in the State of Louisiana, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cane River Creole National 
Historical Park Boundary Modification Act''.

SEC. 2. CANE RIVER CREOLE NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK BOUNDARY 
              MODIFICATION.

    Section 303(b) of the Cane River Creole National Historical Park 
and National Heritage Area Act (16 U.S.C. 410ccc-1(b)) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
        <DELETED>    ``(5) The approximately 46.1 acres of land 
        depicted as tracts 1, 2, and 3 on the map entitled `A Map of 
        Lands in Sections 111, 112 & 113, T7N-R6W' and dated May 20, 
        2021 (referred to in this paragraph as the `Map'), subject to 
        the requirement that, as soon as practicable after the date of 
        enactment of this paragraph, the Secretary shall prepare a map 
        of the tracts consistent with National Park Service standards 
        to replace the Map.</DELETED>
            ``(5) The approximately 46.1 acres of land identified as 
        `Proposed Addition', as generally depicted on the map entitled 
        `Cane River Creole National Historical Park Proposed Addition--
        Magnolia Plantation Unit', numbered 494/176,958, and dated 
        October 2021.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 500

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2438

                          [Report No. 117-157]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To modify the boundary of the Cane River Creole National Historical 
        Park in the State of Louisiana, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 21, 2022

                       Reported with an amendment
```
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Chip Brian, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
September 30, 2006 of Comtex News Network, Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

        (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

        (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

        (c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

        (a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

        (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls over financial reporting.


November 14, 2006                        /s/Chip Brian
                                         ---------------------------
                                         Chip Brian
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2184 

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to institute a trading prohibition 

for certain issuers that retain public accounting firms that have not 

been subject to inspection by the Public Company Accounting Oversight 

Board, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2021 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice, considered, read the third time, and passed 

A BILL 

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to institute a 

trading prohibition for certain issuers that retain public 

accounting firms that have not been subject to inspection 

by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRADING PROHIBITION FOR 2 CONSECUTIVE 

4 NON-INSPECTION YEARS. 

5 Section 104(i) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 

6 U.S.C. 7214(i)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2184 CPS

1 (1) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking ‘‘the 

2 foreign jurisdiction described in clause (i)’’ and in3 serting ‘‘a foreign jurisdiction’’; and 

4 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

5 (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking 

6 ‘‘3’’ and inserting ‘‘2’’; and 

7 (B) in subparagraph (A), in the matter 

8 preceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘3’’ and insert9 ing ‘‘2’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2367 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire land in Frederick 

County, Maryland, for the Historic Preservation Training Center of the 

National Park Service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2021 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself and Mr. VAN HOLLEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to acquire land 

in Frederick County, Maryland, for the Historic Preservation Training Center of the National Park Service, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Frederick Jobs and 

5 Historic Preservation Training Center Land Acquisition 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

8 In this Act: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2367 IS

1 (1) CENTER.—The term ‘‘Center’’ means the 

2 Historic Preservation Training Center and related 

3 facilities of the National Park Service in Frederick 

4 County, Maryland. 

5 (2) SECRETARY.—The term ‘‘Secretary’’ means 

6 the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Di7 rector of the National Park Service. 

8 SEC. 3. ACQUISITION OF LAND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PUR9 POSES OF HISTORIC PRESERVATION TRAIN10 ING CENTER. 

11 (a) IN GENERAL.—To further develop the Center in 

12 accordance with section 305306 of title 54, United States 

13 Code, the Secretary may acquire not more than 20 acres 

14 of land or interests in land in Frederick County, Mary15 land, for the Center for the purpose of supporting the 

16 physical space, program initiatives, and workforce develop17 ment capacity of the Center. 

18 (b) METHOD OF ACQUISITION.—Land or an interest 

19 in land for the Center may only be acquired under sub20 section (a) by donation, transfer, exchange, or purchase 

21 from a willing seller using donated or appropriated funds. 

22 (c) ADMINISTRATION OF ACQUIRED LAND.—On ac23 quisition of land or an interest in land for the Center 

24 under subsection (a), the acquired land or interest in land 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2367 IS

1 shall be administered by the Secretary for the purpose de2 scribed in subsection (a). 

3 SEC. 4. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

4 There are authorized to be appropriated to the Sec5 retary such sums as are necessary to carry out this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel
M. Healy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.
C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

/s/ Daniel M. HealyDaniel M. Healy
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

May 14, 2003

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

30
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1547

SAMUEL M. JAMES,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00827-REP)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel M. James, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel M. James appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. James v. United States, No. 

3:14-cv-00827-REP (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 10 & entered Mar. 11, 

2016). We deny James’ motion for appointment of counsel and 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 99.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texland Drilling Program1981, LTD, (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the Report), I, M. E. Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and | 
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. | 
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 




/s/ M. E. ChapmanM. E. Chapman Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2002