alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
^^E DS TA^^^ 

# ^^7z^

^ r A ı p ,^ o r ES UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

The Honorable Gary R. Herbert Governor of Utah P.O. Box 142220 Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-2200

1)ear Governor Herbert:

Thank you for your letter of June 20, 2013, expressing your support of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's proposed Tier 3 regulations for motor vehicle emissions and gasoline standards.

At the outset, having just been confirmed by the U.S. Senate, let me say how much I am looking forward to working with you and all of your gubernatorial colleagues across the country. I have worked with several governors throughout my career and truly appreciate the vast responsibilities they have and what a tremendous job they do carrying them out.

I appreciate the information you shared regarding the need for a Tier 3 program and its potential for reducing harmful air pollutants in Utah. The health and air quality benefits of the proposed Tier 3 program are too important to delay, and the EPA is working to finalize these standards by the end of this year. Over 158 million Americans are currently experiencing unhealthy levels of air pollution which are linked to adverse health impacts such as hospital admissions, emergency room visits and premature mortality. By reducing motor vehicle emissions, the proposed Tier 3 standards would lead to immediateair quality improvements that are critically important for states to attain and maintain the existing healthbased National Ambient Air Quality Standards and realize substantial health benefits.

The EPA understands the importance of potential cost impacts on refineries, automakers, and consumers. As mentioned in your letter, we have included flexibility provisions in the proposed Tier 3 program designed to help refiners and refineries transition to the lower sulfur standards. These flexibilities have proven successful in past fuel programs and include an averaging, banking, and trading program, relief for small refiners and refineries, and economic and technical hardship provisions. We included a refinery-by-refinery analysis of the costs associated with lowering sulfur in gasoline as part of the extensive cost analyses we conducted for the proposed Tier 3 standards. We estimate the proposed Tier 3 program would yield health benefits between $8 and $23 billion annually by 2030 for a cost of about a penny per gallon of gasoline and about $130 per vehicle.

Internet Address (URL) • http//wwwepa gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperWe recognize the specific points you raised and have submitted your letter to the public docket so that

we may also address your comments as part of the final rule.

Again, thank you for your letter. If you have further questions or concerns, please contact me or your staff may call Mark Rupp, the EPA's Deputy Associate Administrator for Intergovernmental Relations, at (202) 564-7178.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6943

ANTHONY BUSSIE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JUDGE KEENAN; JUDGE FLOYD; JUDGE HARRIS; JUDGE BRITT; JUDGE 

BUMB,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:16-cv-00238-RAJ-RJK)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Bussie, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Bussie seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing without prejudice his petition for a writ of mandamus 

for failure to allege sufficient facts in support of his petition.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 

U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral 

orders. 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), Cohen v. 

Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949). Because 

the deficiencies identified by the district court may be remedied 

by filing an amended petition, we conclude that the order Bussie 

seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. See Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal 

Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623-24 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar 

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th 

Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of

jurisdiction and remand the case to the district court with 

instructions to allow Bussie to amend his petition. See Goode, 

807 F.3d at 630. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
# C_2014102EN.01000101.xml

| 7.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/1

---

2014/C 102/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 93, 29.3.2014

OJ C 93, 29.3.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 85, 22.3.2014

OJ C 78, 15.3.2014

OJ C 71, 8.3.2014

OJ C 61, 1.3.2014

OJ C 52, 22.2.2014

OJ C 45, 15.2.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
.--~·~~~~~a&~--tB..a..n..E7Q5~4~~~~.-. 

MEMO ROUTING Sllli I~ !'!E~l'R A!'!'ROV.'ILS, DISAPPROVALS, I" Olf91URRENCES, OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

1 NAME OR TITLE f INITIALS CIRCULATE 

~~______=:~~~~~~~~,~~ 

2 

:J., 

J \ .... , 

FROM NAME OR TITLE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATIO Dor 

DATE COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

or release b NS on 05-16-2014 ursuant t 
'\ 

I 

' 

... y -- , .. 

REF ID:A57054 

-TOP SECRET 

l4 Au&uat 1951 

8UBJECT1 

Re.terenceec (a) Mamo tram .AJ'SA-OOD to A18A-CtOA, 14 April 19;0, on 

ISOB wb ject, 'Id th Cor.inent. No. 1, AISA:--OOA to .AFSA-041 

' ·1-' 1950J and Comment t"o. 2, JPSA-04. to AFSk-OOA. 

{b) 1i1.o tram AFSJr-04 to AFSA-o.2, 'Ihru: AFSA-OOA llD1 

APS.A.-OOU, ~3 May 1950, on -.. eubject, with Cor?Dent 

No,, 2, AFSA-02 to AFSA-ol.1 2 June 1950, and Cazicent. 

No. ' trom Al'SA-OOS to A'tSA-Ol+, 'lbru1 AFSA-OOA, 

7 June 1950. 

(c) Memo !'rOlit Technical. Director, AFSA-crl to AFSA-OOB, 

subjectz Cryptosecurit.,' ot AFSA camrunicatione, 

17 ~11951. 

(d) 1'Ro trcm il'S.A-ooD to AFSA-02, 20 April 1951, cotltl.Glltinc on reference (o). 

(•) lMilno !'ran AFSA-OOX to AFSA-ooB, 2h April 1951. ard 

t.rua AFSA-13 to .AFSA-OOB, 14 liq 1951, cO!:ll:»nting en 

i'eterence (c). 

(.t) 8ur.1nar.1 Report on Securit.7 of AtSA CO!!rlUnicationa, 

25 April 1951, prepared 1n .APSA-41. 

1. 'lbe reterencea 61'8 cited not. onl7 becauee or their direct. bee.riric on the subject but also because the number ot than Wioates that 

tM aubject has been one ot ~ oonoern tfl/! oaae time. 

a. $o tar ea I am lllfal'e a.rd eo tar aa can be seen trom the 

MfGl'GllCee, V8l7 few constructive .t.eps have been taken thue tar to e~ot a eitiw.tion which a.rpeare to be quite dangerous to the eecurity 

ot our camrr llOUl"cefJ. Even u Jrd.nor violation.a ot COMSEC that are dieoovered 1n thQ usual aurvelllanco ueX"Ciaed b,y AFSA....U are corrected on 

• contirnd..n.B beau, unless the baado problems 1.nvolved in brpt\Jve.lleilt 

o• .t.udied ~ anowera ~ed. to thaa, our COUS!C eituo.tion wlll 

Pf'Qbabq cont1nuo to be def~u;tivo. To baw thi• eort ot a eituation 

m.t at the tountain head ot COWEC w.lthin end. tar all the Anl9d Fcrcea 

tieenis to me to call ror pra:ipt attention an:!. action, Id.nee the example 

Ht b,y AFSA would ~ be a ealutmy one tCf.t' the Sarvioee. 

'. tnromation an:I cccmenta tram AJ'SA-04 on this eubject would be 

helpful. 

·TOP SECRET --- -'
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM
10-KSB.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         228,484
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  233,306
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               463,940
<PP&E>                                         110,740
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 520,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          393,517
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,994
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,108
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   520,619
<SALES>                                      1,502,427
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,502,427
<CGS>                                          187,540
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  187,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               666,003
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               283,110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                648,884
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            650,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   650,042
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
# C_2014299EN.01000201.xml

| 5.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7309 — Bridgepoint/EdRCP)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 299/03

On 4 August 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7309. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7309. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Regulator1' Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- Dircctor<Hc Identifier: -A D 

Jf you makl! clwuges fo the mlrws in the ruh/(' helmr .. mu musf ensr11·e fill! lufol:i updote occordin ~l'. If 

they do not, click (or l'ah) into ond rlie11 out <!ftlw clu111ged cell. ·~----~~------------------------------------_j 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Prod uct (e.g .. aircraft engine. 

(e.g., Inspection. propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing. (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

REPLACEMENT 2.0 $0 82 

I I 

. . I 

j l 

i .. I I 

I 

' 

I I 

The known number of products in compliance : 

Total Costs ofconu>liance for U.S. fleet: $ 13,940 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Par1s Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection. (include access. (@Sl? :''hour) 

replacement) testing, and closeup) 

_j 

Special conside rations fo r· Eco nomic Ana lysis (Use this .field to l!xplain an_,·thing in the Estinuaed Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be ob1·ious. Thisfield can also be used to explain lt'arranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be con idercd a "significant regulatory action··? G 

YI2S* D NO cg] 

*Explanation: 

DOT RegulatOJ)' Policies nnd Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? @ 

YI::S* D NO cg] 

*Explanation: 

ReguiHto•-y F'lexibilit)' A<·t: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact 0 11 a su bstantial number of , mall entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No an wer. ® 

YES D NO cg] 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alasl<a: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to incl ude specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviati on might he the <'nly mod .! of transportation? @ 

YES* D NO cg] 

*Explanation:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         123,620
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,675,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  8,147,357
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            15,246,902
<PP&E>                                       3,994,231
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              26,155,717
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,612,319
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        34,738
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,543,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                26,155,717
<SALES>                                     24,257,014
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,257,014
<CGS>                                       11,726,802
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,726,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,344,525
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         (1,147,842)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,124,433)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.71)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.71)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14129-14130]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06276]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0102; FRL-9924-39]


Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee; Extension of Deadline for 
Nominations

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; Extension of nomination period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 14130]]

SUMMARY: This document extends the deadline for submitting a nomination 
to serve on the Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee (PPDC) for 30 days 
from the original deadline of March 16, 2015 to April 16, 2015. The 
nomination period is being extended to ensure the Agency receives a 
diverse range of qualified candidates.

DATES: Nominations must be received on or before April 16, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions provided in the Federal 
Register document of February 13, 2015 (80 FR 8082) (FRL-9922-90).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dea Zimmerman, Designated Federal 
Officer for the PPDC, telephone number: (312) 353-6344; email address: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#13697a7e7e76617e727d3d777672537663723d747c65"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="42382b2f2f27302f232c6c262723022732236c252d34">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register document of February 
13, 2015 (80 FR 8082) (FRL-9922-90), EPA invited nominations to be 
considered for appointment to the PPDC. EPA is hereby extending the 
deadline for nomination to April 16, 2015.
    To submit nominations, please follow the detailed instructions 
provided under ADDRESSES, in the Federal Register document of February 
13, 2015. If you have questions, consult the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: March 11, 2015.
Jack E. Housenger,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-06276 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Termination of Security Interest in Trademarks and Patents



 Exhibit 10.79 
 TERMINATION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN TRADEMARKS AND PATENTS 
 WHEREAS, Luna
Innovations Incorporated, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 2851 Commerce Street, Blacksburg, VA 24060 (the “Grantor”), is the owner of record of the trademarks and applications listed on the
attached Exhibit A, now issued or pending in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “Trademarks”); and is the owner of record of the patents and patent applications listed on the attached Exhibit B, now
issued or pending in the United States Patent and Trademark Office (the “Patents”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Grantor
entered into that certain Security Agreement dated as of January 12, 2010 (the “Security Agreement”), between the Grantor and Hansen Medical, Inc., (“Secured Party”), a true and correct copy of
which was recorded by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on January 14, 2010, at Ree14131, Frame 0984; 

WHEREAS, the Secured Party desires to release its security interest in the Trademarks and Patents and terminate the Security Agreement;

 NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Secured Party hereby:

 1. releases and reassigns to the Grantor any and all liens, security interests, right, title and interest of Secured Party
pursuant to the Security Agreement in the trademarks and applications more fully described on Exhibit A, without recourse or representation or warranty, express or implied; and 

2. releases and reassigns to the Grantor any and all liens, security interests, right, title and interest of Secured Party pursuant to
the Security Agreement in the patents and applications more fully described on Exhibit B, without recourse or representation or warranty, express or implied; and 
 3. authorizes and requests the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks of the United States of America to note and record the existence of the release hereby given. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Secured Party has caused this Termination of Security Interest in Trademarks and Patents to be signed by its duly
authorized representative as of this 18th day of May 2011. 
  

			
	 Secured Party:
  

Hansen Medical, Inc.

		
	By:	 	/s/ Bruce J Barclay
		
	Name:	 	Bruce J Barclay
		
	Title:	 	President and CEO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and the Board's Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238) to acquire shares of a savings and loan holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 6, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:

                    1.                     *Jane Houston McCready, Winchester, Kentucky; Sarah McCready Boston, New York, New York; and Louise French McCready Hart,*                     New York, New York, as individuals and in their capacities as co-trustees of Marital Trust B which was created under the Richard F. McCready Revocable Trust Agreement; to acquire voting shares of WinFirst Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of Winchester Federal Bank, both in Winchester, Kentucky.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 17, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-06399 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P