alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
5fCftE1" 

F'M: 

TO: 

INfO: 

MSG NR: 

DTGs 

. SUSLO LONDON 

NSA EUROPE 

ASAE 

DIRNSA 

LW 282 

/ 

I. 

281751 Z APR I L 54 

"--

S~~---J\¥4f4 B 2 5'i::; URJTY RlFORMA'FlO~i 

t T AG I II ¢56 71 

CT: 7.¢. INFO: ~621 

V/DIR 

C/S 

AG 

¢62 

P/P 

ocs 

115 

1 

2 

~ 

~ 7-8 

9 

1~ 

REUR rw 699, rw 587 ANO MY 2¢141¢z MARCH. AS STATED MY LW 2¢8 

(231122z) MARCH AND 2¢141¢z MARCH MSGS, PRELIMINARY INTERROGATllON 

REP~TI l\ON GRIGORIEV WAS SENT TO USAREUR AND DEPT Of 

ARMY WASHINGTON. ALS.O SENT USAREUR AND ARMY (LATTER VIA SALO} 

WERE 3 SUBSEQUENT INTERROGATION REPORTS: I 

\INTERROGATION or SOVIET DEFECTOR L--------------=====:::::::.... __ __ GRIGORIEV," DATED 15 APRI L~ .... _______ I (D) "SOVIET UNltORMS 

AND INSIGNIA" DATED 2¢ APRIL; ANDI I TECHNICAL INTELLIGENCE 

REPORT, REINTERROGATION or SOVIET SIGNALS Of"FICER," DATED l5 APRIL. 

I LATTER RE PORT I NCLUOES I NTER~OGA i1~ BY\ ':l I / I 

>ATE RECD: 2821¢8z APRI l 54 BL/ARJ •¢ COPIES 

2 .PAGES 

10 UNCLASS Ir IE D RE PL y OR REFERENCE Ir THE DA TE TI ME GROUP rs/ QUOTED 

'ARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEtORE' D£CL.ASSI FYI NG 

SECRET ~L 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-13-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 
;,)[ C"E T Pf~ l OR I TY 

DTG: 281751z APRIL 54 

PL 86-36/50 USC 36 

EO 3.3(h) (2) 

MSG NR: LW 282 

2. IN VIEW GENEROUS DI STR I BUT I ON ALREADY GI VEN US, DO ~OT \DES I RE 

REQUEST ADDITIONAL COPIES UNLESS NECESSARY 

3. GRIGORIEV IS IN HANDS OF WAR OFFICE BUT UNDER CONTROL Of 

CABINET LEVEL SUB COMMITTEE WHICH HAS JURISDICTION OVER ALL DEFECTOR 

INTERROGATIONS. COMMITTEE TAKING ACTIVE INTEREST IN GRIGORIEV CASE. 

BELIEVE BEST COURSE IS TO CONTINUE WORKING THROUGH 

USAREUR. RECOMMEND STRONGLY THAT ALL 

BE STUDIED CAREtULLY AT ASAf AND NSA L--~~~~~~~~~~~~--' 

, 

BEFORE WE PRESS FOR RE INTERROGATION BY ASAE PERSONNEL. 37/6 

IMPR£SSES ME AS BEING PRETTY THOROUGH JOB. HAVE CONFIRMED THAT 

GRIGORIEV REALLY IS IN POOR PHYS 1CAL CONDITION ANO UNCOOPERATIVE JUST 

NOW 

NSA 115 NOTE: rw 699 NO RECORD 

FW 587 IS AGI# ¢3871 

LW 2¢8 IS AGI# ¢3811 

DTG: 2¢141¢Z IS AGI# ¢3729 

ADDtTIONAL INFO CONTAINED IN AGI# ¢5672 

COPY~ __ or _ __Jif_~COP I ES 

PAGE __ 2_0F 2 PAGES 

NO UNCLASSIFIED REPLY OR REFE.RENCE IF THE DATE TIME GROUP IS QUOTED 

PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING 

FORM 781-ClOC 

6 JUL 51 SECRET
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00218

- CR

Christopher Robin
v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 252nd District Court of Jefferson County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 08

- 03949

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cau se on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed as modified by

this Court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
May 21, 2015
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000437

17-NOV-2016

08:36 AM
G.M., THE FATHER OF S.B.M., 

L.M., AND C.M., MINOR ETC.,

Appellants,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CHILDREN AND FAMILIES,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1538

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Karen A. Gievers, Judge.

Terry P. Roberts, Tallahassee, for Appellant, G.M. Leonard T. Helfand, Tallahassee, 

for Appellant, C.M.

Dwight O. Slater, Appellate Counsel, Tallahassee, for Florida Department of 

Children and Families. Kelley Schaeffer of Guardian ad Litem Program, Sanford, 

for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., JAY, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          16,128
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  113,932
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,917
<INVENTORY>                                    106,870
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               254,484
<PP&E>                                         133,126
<DEPRECIATION>                                  79,552
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,435
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           81,822
<BONDS>                                        108,790
<COMMON>                                           162
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,062
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   346,435
<SALES>                                        183,464
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               220,697
<CGS>                                          128,270
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  150,852
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,135
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   180
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,998)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (9,499)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,499)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,499)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.58)
        

</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

JOE A. VANN, JR.,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF 

VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-7119

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 13-0932, Judge Coral Wong 

Pietsch.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Joe A. Vann, Jr. moves for an extension of time to file 

his opening brief.

Upon consideration thereof:

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 14-7119 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 09/24/2014
2 VANN v. MCDONALD

The motion is granted to the extent that Mr. Vann’s 

opening brief (form enclosed) is due on or before November 24, 2014. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s21

Case: 14-7119 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 09/24/2014
I 

REF ID:A71839 

Security 

1 Col.Corderman 1. It has come to mT attention 

that in several instances SSA personnel have been heard to say ••What a story all this wou1d make! I can hardly vait 

until the var is over." 

2. Remarks such as the foregoing 

are o~v1ousl7 the result of a complete misunderstanding of the permanently binding nature ot the secrecy oath 

taken by all SSA personnel prior to their 

acceptance tor duty. 

'· It is apparent that insu£ticient 

emphasis ha.a been placed upon the underlined clause in the attached copy ot 

the oath. 

4. It is reconnnended that: 

a. Immediate steps be taken 

to call to-the attention or all o~ticers. 

enlisted men, and civilian employee ~he tact that the secrecy oath was 

dl-awn up and is intended to be just as 

binding after the war as it is during the war. 

b. Attempt should be made 

to cause legislation to be enacted with 

a view to accomplishing vb.at the British 

Defense of the Realm Act accomplishes, ~1z, provides strict penalties tor ~sclqsure, without proper authority, 

ot intormation detrimental to the 

National Defense. I think an act could 

be drawn to do what is necessary in this 

regard without infringing in any way 

upon the rights or free speech and now 

is the time. However, in dratting such 

legislation it is essential that technically qualified people assist in the 

vork so as to avoid a repetition of the 

JA'ppro'Vld for Release by NSA on 09-19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 
l 

(cont'd) 

. ' 

I 

.n 

REF ID:A71839 

Security 

very unf"avorable publicity that arose 

vhen something like this was attempted in 1933 in the case of a Yardley book 

that had to be suppressed, which led 

to the enactment of a perfectly futile 

and sill7 lav. 

5. The enactment of appropriate legislation would have a protective etfect far beyond the scope of any- thing we could do here because after 

a11 the oath which we administer "has 

no teeth in it" and,, what is more 

important, a law would apply to all 

persons, not only those in SSA. For 

example, there are probably several w~ore of people who handle our output 

in one Y&J" or another and over whom 

we have absolutely no control. Nor 

do I think anT special oath is administered in their case; yet from a secrecy point of view,, it is just as essential 

that they be prohibited from disclosing this kind ot information as it is that 

SSA people be prohibited from doing so. 

W.F. Friedman 

Di;r. Com. Res. 

8P5I8-3 

23 July 1943
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2358 

To provide flexibility under the Federal Unemployment Compensation 

program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2021 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To provide flexibility under the Federal Unemployment 

Compensation program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Workforce Support 

5 and Flexibility Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FLEXIBILITY UNDER THE FEDERAL UNEMPLOY7 MENT COMPENSATION PROGRAM. 

8 Section 2104(b)(3)(A) of the CARES Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 9023(b)(3)(A)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2358 IS

1 (1) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘September 6, 

2 2021’’ and inserting ‘‘the date of the enactment of 

3 the Workforce Support and Flexibility Act of 2021’’; 

4 and 

5 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(iii) For weeks of unemployment 

7 ending after the date of the enactment of 

8 the Workforce Support and Flexibility Act 

9 of 2021, and ending on or before Sep10 tember 6, 2021, $300 (or, upon written 

11 notice by the State to the Secretary, an 

12 amount established by the State that is 

13 less than $300 (but not less than $1).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

830 

KA 11-01482 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, CENTRA, FAHEY, AND PERADOTTO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMAL H., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.) 

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DREW R. DUBRIN OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (GEOFFREY KAEUPER OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an adjudication of the Supreme Court, Monroe County

(Francis A. Affronti, J.), rendered May 25, 2011. Defendant was

adjudicated a youthful offender upon his plea of guilty of robbery in

the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the adjudication so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same Memorandum as in People v Jamal H. ([appeal No. 2] ___ AD3d

___ [Sept. 27, 2013]).

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# C_2014111EN.01000601.xml

| 12.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 111/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 111/6

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 April 2014

(2014/C 111/04)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3872 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,69 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4662 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0754 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2161 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2605 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,452 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1837 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4658 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9490 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4772 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5216 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7575 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6003 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7342 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 443,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5728 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6151 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6188 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 868,51 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4904 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,640 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,5665 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,815 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0667 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1640 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,4766 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3872

JPY

Japanese yen

140,69

DKK

Danish krone

7,4662

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82910

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0754

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2161

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2605

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,452

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1837

RON

Romanian leu

4,4658

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9490

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4772

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5216

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7575

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6003

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7342

KRW

South Korean won

1 443,75

ZAR

South African rand

14,5728

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6151

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6188

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 868,51

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4904

PHP

Philippine peso

61,640

RUB

Russian rouble

49,5665

THB

Thai baht

44,815

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0667

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1640

INR

Indian rupee

83,4766

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 32.1**
**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**
     In connection with the Annual Report of BrantleyCapital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Kfor the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, Robert P. Pinkas, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of Brantley Capital Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to thebest of my knowledge:
     (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ ROBERT P. PINKAS      Robert P. Pinkas     Chief Executive Officer    March 30, 2004
54
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements of Metris Companies Inc. for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           8,902
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                19,001
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        215,329
<ALLOWANCE>                                     12,829
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,616
<DEPOSITS>                                       1,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                    54,163
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             92,735
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           192
<OTHER-SE>                                     138,526
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 286,616
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 29,028
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  867
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   299
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                30,194
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                  48
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,106
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           26,088
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   18,477
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                101,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 32,546
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      20,016
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,016
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    17.6
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     4,913
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,679
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,514
<RECOVERIES>                                       187
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               12,829
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            12,829
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1

From:

Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:47 PM

To: RedHill

Subject: Comments on AOC

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

To Whom It May Concern:

Hawaii and its people have played host to various branches of the United States military for many 

years and although we have not always agreed with decisions and actions taken by the United States 

military regarding the Hawaiian Islands, we have continued to accommodate their needs. As time 

passes, it becomes more and more clear that this relationship is not reciprocal and that the United 

States military has very little regard for the islands and the people who have taken care of them.

The fuel tank leak at Red Hill is further evidence that the United States Department of Defense does 

not care about Hawaii or its people. Not only was the United States Navy aware of fuel potentially 

leaking from their storage tanks, but they did very little to correct the problem. It took 27,000 gallons 

of fuel spillage from one tank for them to act on this threat by increasing the “frequency of monitoring” 

rather than permanently fixing the problem and decreasing the possibility of a disaster. With twenty 

fuel tanks in this area, capable of holding 250 million gallons of fuel between them, the probability for 

another leak in the same or different fuel tank is very high and could damage our drinking water 

supply for years to come.

As a branch of government tasked with protecting people, the United States Navy has a duty to take 

care of Hawaii’s people by accepting responsibility for the fuel leak and following the 

recommendations of the City and County of Honolulu’s Board of Water Supply, the stewards of 

Oahu’s water supply. The current AOC is not acceptable and does not clearly outline what will be 

done to ensure that Oahu’s drinking water supply will be safe and fuel-free in the future. The AOC 

should hold the Navy accountable for cleaning the water that has been already contaminated while 

requiring the Navy or the U.S. Department of Defense to permanently remedy the situation.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of vFinance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Timothy Mahoney, Chief
Operating Officer and acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date:  August 18,  2003             By: /s/ Timothy Mahoney
                                        -------------------
                                     Name:  Timothy Mahoney
                                    Title:  Chief Operating Officer and
                                            acting Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to vFinance, Inc. and will be
retained by vFinance, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.