Fw: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg , and scheduling next mtg

Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 05/03/2010 11:27 AM

Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D.

Environmental Protection Specialist

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

(919) 541-7524

stewart.michael@epa.gov

----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/03/2010 11:27 AM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard 

Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/03/2010 11:26 AM

Subject: RE: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg

Thanks Heidi. I think that we need to provide a briefing on everything in the package, since the decisions 

on monitoring are directly linked to the decision on modeling. Then if more detail is needed, Chet's folks 

can provide a separate briefing that we will attend. Does that sound right to you?

"King, Heidi R." Thanks for your message, Lydia, 1) Thu meeting... 05/03/2010 10:45:31 AM

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 05/03/2010 10:45 AM

Subject: RE: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg

Thanks for your message, Lydia,

1) Thu meeting is in response to your suggestion that we brief the interagency 

group on policy decisions this week (not modeling)

2) The reviewer asked for key comments only, so what you suggest (the main 

group of public health commenters, UARG, API, ACC and all the state comments) 

would be perfect, thank you. We appreciate EPA sending these to help 

reviewers move more quickly, rather than asking reviewers to fish through 

regulations.gov.

I hope you had a good weekend,

heidi

-----Original Message-----

From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:41 AM

To: King, Heidi R.

Cc: Morrison.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov; Stewart.Michael@epamail.epa.gov

Subject: Re: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next 

mtg

Heidi,
I just left you a VM with a question about Thursday's meeting. Mike and I

also have a question about which comments you would like to have. We have 

about 80-100 substantive comments. We can send you the main group of public 

health commenters, UARG, API, ACC and all the state comments.

Does this sound sufficient, or would you like to see all of them?

Thanks.

Lydia

 

 From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov> 

 To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Margaret 

Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Date: 04/30/2010 03:23 PM 

 Subject: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling 

next mtg 

Hello Lydia and Margaret,

Reviewers have asked EPA to share key comments described in the briefing

today, including those from Health and Environmental Groups, Industry

Groups, State and local governments cited in the presentation.

Also – is EPA available the morning of Thursday, 5/6, for a teleconference on 

EPA’s final rule?

Thanks,

heidi