alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.4**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 1, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Preston Romm, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Preston Romm

Preston Romm

Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

May 10, 2007

 

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Iomega Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00347-CV

ALLSTATE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Gregorio G. PAREDES Jr.,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9,016

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED 

and this appeal is DISMISSED. 

We order that each party bear its own costs of appeal as agreed. 

SIGNED November 23, 2016.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
., 

\ 

REF ID:A69354 

Week ending 5.8.44. EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Watch Air Keys. 

The only Air key still defying us is Gnat, Fliegerkorps X. Lily, which bas no Uncle, is difficult enough without one; for Firefly we are 

largely dependent on cillies, and for Glow-worm on re-encodements from 

Firefly. Firefly does not seem to be using his large store of Uncles 

but we do not yet know about Glow-worm. There is fairly good evidence 

since the 5th. that Wasp, who started without his bas now put it on his 

best crib frequencies and we may be in for trouble. Jaguar, a heavy 

user of D and of Uhr, has g>t stuck for the last day or two. We are 

likely to have to fight bard to retain our hold. The early breaks of Ocelot 

(average time 1310) together with its Uncle - less condition are a great 

boon. 

eclassifi ed and a ursuantto E .0. 1352
# C_2015229EN.01000401.xml

| 14.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 229/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 229/4

---

Special Report No 2/2015

‘EU-funding of Urban Waste Water Treatment plants in the Danube river basin: further efforts needed in helping Member States to achieve EU waste water policy objectives’

(2015/C 229/04)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 2/2015 ‘EU-funding of Urban Waste Water Treatment plants in the Danube river basin: further efforts needed in helping Member States to achieve EU waste water policy objectives’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| Email: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

Email: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
**CERTIFICATIONS                                                                           Exhibit 31.4**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preston Romm

Vice President of Finance and

Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014272EN.01000301.xml

| 20.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 272/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 272/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 August 2014

(2014/C 272/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3354 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4561 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80265 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1529 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2104 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1975 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 28,004 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,48 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1893 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4313 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8929 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4298 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4568 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,3499 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5787 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6628 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 359,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1996 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,2022 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6076 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 596,14 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2165 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,259 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,3057 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,546 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0211 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4323 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,1032 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3354

JPY

Japanese yen

137,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4561

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80265

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1529

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2104

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1975

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

28,004

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,48

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1893

RON

Romanian leu

4,4313

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8929

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4298

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4568

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,3499

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5787

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6628

KRW

South Korean won

1 359,96

ZAR

South African rand

14,1996

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,2022

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6076

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 596,14

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2165

PHP

Philippine peso

58,259

RUB

Russian rouble

48,3057

THB

Thai baht

42,546

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0211

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4323

INR

Indian rupee

81,1032

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0019

_________________

KRISTINE DAVENPORT,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

COUNTY OF LINCOLN, a political

subdivision of the State of Montana; 

SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY OF LINCOLN, 

State of Montana; and ROBY BOWE,

 Defendants and Appellees.

O R D E R

_________________

This Court reviews briefs to ensure compliance with Rules 11 and 12 of the Montana 

Rules of Appellate Procedure. After reviewing the Appellant’s Reply Brief filed on August 

31, 2020, this Court has determined that the brief does not comply with the following Rule 

and must be resubmitted. 

M. R. App. P. 11(4)(a) states that reply briefs shall not exceed 5,000 words. Despite 

certifying her compliance with the Rule, Appellant has not complied with the word limit. 

First, Appellant improperly has inserted hyphens between words in almost every sentence 

contained in the brief. These hyphens serve to circumvent a word processing program’s 

word count function, artificially reducing the brief’s word count to 5,000 or fewer words. 

Second, Appellant attached four exhibits, totaling ten pages, to her reply brief. These 

exhibits are merely extensions of Appellant’s arguments, and further serve to extend the 

length of her brief well past 5,000 words. 

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the signed original and nine copies of the 

referenced brief be returned for revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a signed original and nine copies of the revised 

brief ordered herein be filed within ten (10) days of the date of this Order with the Clerk 

of this Court and that one copy of the revised brief be served on each counsel of record;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than 

08/31/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0019
those necessary to comply with this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the postage costs for returning the referenced 

copies of Appellant’s brief will be billed to Appellant by the Clerk of this Court and shall 

be due and payable upon receipt; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to Appellant

and to all counsel upon whom the brief was served. 

Electronically signed by:

Beth Baker

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 31 2020
<PAGE>

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John A. Witham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                  /s/ JOHN A. WITHAM
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      John A. Witham
                                               Executive Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

April 29, 2004
Acosta dissent–Page 1

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-0967-15

GENARO GALVAN ACOSTA, JR, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

LIVE OAK COUNTY

MEYERS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

DISSENTING OPINION

The court of appeals correctly applied the affirmative links standard from Evans v.

State, 202 S.W.3d 158 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) and concluded that most of the factors

used to show an affirmative link were not present in this case. The majority refers to this

as a “divide and conquer” analysis and says that the court of appeals should not have

considered what evidence was missing. Instead, the majority takes what little evidence

was presented and draws inferences from the evidence until it cumulates enough to
Acosta dissent–Page 2

support Appellant’s conviction. This is exactly what the majority did in Murray v. State,

457 S.W.3d 446 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015), and I dissented to the use of such attenuated

inferences.

The observations made by the officers in this case may have amounted to probable

cause to arrest Appellant, but they do not affirmatively link Appellant to the drugs found

in the car. Because Appellant was not in exclusive possession of the place where the

drugs were found, more investigation should have been conducted after Appellant’s arrest

to establish whether he exercised actual care, custody, or control over the drugs as

required to prove unlawful possession of a controlled substance. I agree with the court of

appeals that the evidence presented to the jury was insufficient to support Appellant’s

conviction and I therefore respectfully dissent.

Filed: November 23, 2016

Do Not Publish
Citicorp Mortgage,       12855 North Outer Forty Drive
Inc.                     St. Louis, Missouri
                         63141

A subsidiary of
Citicorp

                                                                  (logo)CITICORP









As of and for the year ended  December 31, 1996,  Citicorp  Mortgage,  Inc.  (an
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Citicorp) and subsidiaries (the Company) has
complied,  in all material  respects,  with the minimum servicing  standards set
forth  in  the  Mortgage  Bankers   Association  of  America's   UNIFORM  SINGLE
ATTESTATION  PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS.  As of and for this same period,  the
Company had in effect  fidelity  bond and errors and  omissions  policies in the
amount of $272.5 million.



Very truly yours, 
CITICORP MORTGAGE, INC.


By: /s/David B. Lowman
David B. Lowman, Managing Director -
Mortgage Services

By: /s/Jim B. Levites
Jim B. Levites, Managing Director -
Default Management

By: /s/Richard G. Thornberry
Richard G. Thornberry, President/Chief Operating Officer

By: /s/Carl L. Levinson
Carl L. Levinson, Chairman/Chief Executive Officer






February 14, 1997



kpmgsign
EXHIBIT 13.1

  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SS. 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

In connection with the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004 of Orckit Communications Ltd. (the "Company") as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on the date
hereof (the "Report") and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Eric Paneth, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
     at the end of, and for the period covered by the Report.

Date:  March 21, 2005

By: /s/ Eric Paneth
-------------------
Eric Paneth
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
# CA2014321EN.01000201.xml

| 18.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 321/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 321/2

---

RESERVE LIST (1)

1

OPEN COMPETITION

OHIM/AD/01/13 — Administrators (AD 6) in the field of intellectual property

2014/C 321 A/02

| AMICO ROXAS | Salvatore |
| --- | --- |
| BENEDETTI-ALOISI | Michele Maria |
| BESLIER | Stéphane |
| BIANCHI | Richard |
| CAPOSTAGNO | Maria Luce |
| CEĹISOVA | Ludmila |
| CONDELLO | Francesca Stefania |
| CRAWCOUR | Alexandra Paula |
| DE PAIVA ANDRADE TEIXEIRA | José Alexandre |
| DUARTE GUIMARÃES | Pedro |
| FISCHER | Martin Richard |
| GARCIA LLEDO | Ines |
| GARCIA QUINTO | Juan Fabian |
| GENTILE | Stefano |
| GRAUL | Astrid |
| HANF | Dominik |
| HANNE | Stephan |
| HARRINGTON | Ian Paul |
| IBAÑEZ FIORILLO | Maria Clara |
| IVANAUSKAS | Justas |
| KAZIMIERCZAK | Michal |
| KUNZ | Holger |
| LENZ | Martin |
| LLEO SATORRE | Carlos |
| LUKOSIUTE | Asta |
| MATTILA | Tuomas Joel |
| MENSING | Volker |
| MOISESCU | Ioana Cristina |
| NÉMETH | Judit |
| NICOLÁS MASCARELL | Alejandro |
| NUNES FERREIRA | Ricardo |
| O’NEILL | Hugh |
| PETSCH | Justyna |
| POHLMANN | André |
| POTMAKOVA | Renata |
| SARAPOGLU | Reiner |
| SCHEFFER | Emilie |
| SIPOS | Péter |
| SÖDER | Antje |
| STOJKOWICZ | Zuzanna |
| STÜRMANN | Sven |
| URIARTE VALIENTE | Begoña |
| VAN ROODEN | Adriana |
| ZAERA CUADRADO | Elisa |

AMICO ROXAS

Salvatore

BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Michele Maria

BESLIER

Stéphane

BIANCHI

Richard

CAPOSTAGNO

Maria Luce

CEĹISOVA

Ludmila

CONDELLO

Francesca Stefania

CRAWCOUR

Alexandra Paula

DE PAIVA ANDRADE TEIXEIRA

José Alexandre

DUARTE GUIMARÃES

Pedro

FISCHER

Martin Richard

GARCIA LLEDO

Ines

GARCIA QUINTO

Juan Fabian

GENTILE

Stefano

GRAUL

Astrid

HANF

Dominik

HANNE

Stephan

HARRINGTON

Ian Paul

IBAÑEZ FIORILLO

Maria Clara

IVANAUSKAS

Justas

KAZIMIERCZAK

Michal

KUNZ

Holger

LENZ

Martin

LLEO SATORRE

Carlos

LUKOSIUTE

Asta

MATTILA

Tuomas Joel

MENSING

Volker

MOISESCU

Ioana Cristina

NÉMETH

Judit

NICOLÁS MASCARELL

Alejandro

NUNES FERREIRA

Ricardo

O’NEILL

Hugh

PETSCH

Justyna

POHLMANN

André

POTMAKOVA

Renata

SARAPOGLU

Reiner

SCHEFFER

Emilie

SIPOS

Péter

SÖDER

Antje

STOJKOWICZ

Zuzanna

STÜRMANN

Sven

URIARTE VALIENTE

Begoña

VAN ROODEN

Adriana

ZAERA CUADRADO

Elisa

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2017.

The reserve list will be valid until 31 December 2017.

---

(1)  A successful candidate may explicitly request her/his name not be published.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000352715
<NAME> BIOSONICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,827
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,000
<INVENTORY>                                     62,695
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               215,365
<PP&E>                                         254,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                 244,302
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 234,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,342,507
<BONDS>                                        187,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,636
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,108,207)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   234,300
<SALES>                                         18,679
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,967
<CGS>                                           12,459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  604,153
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               416,824
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,223
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (593,645)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (593,645)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

TIMOTHY A. REESE, IN HIS OFFICIAL 

CAPACITY AS THE TREASURER OF 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF 

PENNSYLVANIA

v.

PENNSYLVANIANS FOR UNION 

REFORM AND SIMON CAMPBELL, 

PRESIDENT, GOVERNOR'S OFFICE OF 

ADMINISTRATION

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, 

COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL 

EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 13, AFL-CIO; 

FEDERATION OF STATE, CULTURAL 

AND EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONALS, 

LOCAL 2383 AMERICAN FEDERATION 

OF TEACHERS PENNSYLVANIA, AFLCIO; AND UNITED FOOD AND 

COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1776, 

AFL-CIO,

Intervenors

PETITION OF: AMERICAN FEDERATION 

OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL 

EMPLOYEES, COUNCIL 13, AFL-CIO; 

FEDERATION OF STATE, CULTURAL 

AND EDUCATIONAL PROFESSIONALS, 

LOCAL 2383 AMERICAN FEDERATION 

OF TEACHERS PENNSYLVANIA, AFLCIO; AND UNITED FOOD AND 

COMMERCIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 1776, 

AFL-CIO,

Intervenors

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 82 MM 2016
82 MM 2016 - 2

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of November, 2016, it is hereby ordered that:

1. The Petition for Review is GRANTED.

2. The appeal at 82 MM 2016 is hereby consolidated with the appeals at 

42 MAP 2016 and 43 MAP 2016.

3. The parties are hereby directed to file supplemental briefs addressing the 

impact of Pa. State Educ. Ass’n v. Dept. of Cmty. and Econ. Dev., _ A.3d __, 

2016 WL 6087684 (Pa. October 18, 2016) on the consolidated appeals.

Chief Justice Saylor files a dissenting statement in which Justice Mundy joins.
#### Jacob Quinton’s License. Jacob Quinton’s Appeal.

*Liquor laws*— Retail *license*— Discretion *of court.*

AVliere the record of an application for a retail liquor license shows that the case was heard and considered by the lower court, the Supreme Court will not reverse an order refusing the license, although the lower court filed no opinion, and assigned no reason for its action. Gross’s License, 161 Pa. *84A,*followed.

Argued May 27, 1895.

Appeal, No. 436, Jan. T., 1895, by Jacob Quinton, from order of Q. S. Northumberland Co., Feb. T., 1895, No. 47, refusing a retail liquor license.

Before Green, Williams, McCollum, Dean and Fell, JJ.

Afffirmed.

Application for a retail liquor license.

The record showed that remonstrances were filed. The court made the following order: “ February 9,1895, after hearing, the sureties on the within bond are approved and license as prayed for refused.

No opinion was filed or reasons assigned for the order.

*Error assigned*was above order.

June 3, 1895:

*Vorris*Auten, *Charles B. Witmer*with him, for appellant,

cited: Johnson’s License, 156 Pa. 322.

No paper book filed or argument offered for appellee.

Per Curiam,

The license in this case was refused after hearing. The order is the same as was sustained in Gross’s License, 161 Pa. 344, and for the reasons stated in that and other cases, we decline to interfere with the action of the learned court below.

Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at the cost of the appellant.