alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014138EN.01000101.xml

| 8.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 May 2014

(2014/C 138/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3927 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,68 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4641 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82070 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0497 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2186 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2235 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,412 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1998 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4295 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9133 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4909 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5164 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7957 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6035 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7396 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 424,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6360 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,6833 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5863 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 120,38 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5228 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,711 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,1860 |
| THB | Thai baht | 45,101 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1037 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,1319 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,6525 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3927

JPY

Japanese yen

141,68

DKK

Danish krone

7,4641

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82070

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0497

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2186

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2235

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,412

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1998

RON

Romanian leu

4,4295

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9133

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4909

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5164

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7957

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6035

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7396

KRW

South Korean won

1 424,96

ZAR

South African rand

14,6360

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,6833

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5863

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 120,38

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5228

PHP

Philippine peso

61,711

RUB

Russian rouble

49,1860

THB

Thai baht

45,101

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1037

MXN

Mexican peso

18,1319

INR

Indian rupee

83,6525

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the Court has determined th a t

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 98-51101 Summary Calendar

_____________________ ETHEL WALTON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus
BAYLOR UNIVERSITY,
Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas

(W-97-CV-264)

_________________________________________________________________ May 7, 1999
Before POLITZ, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Ethel Walton appeals the adverse summary judgment in her ADEA and Title VII action against Baylor University.

As is more than well-established, we review a summary judgment

de novo , applying the same standard as the district court. E.g. ,
OHM Remediati on Services v. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc. , 116 F.3d
1574, 1579 (5th Cir. 1997). Such judgment is appropriate where

“ther e is no genuine issue as to any material fact and ... the
moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law." F ED
. R.

C IV
. P. 56(c).2

Walton claims that various transfers, changes in job duties,

and leaves with pay constituted adverse employment action; that

B aylor’s proffered reasons for these decisions are a pretext for

age and race discrimination; and that she was retaliated against

for filing a complaint with the EEOC. Pursuant to our d e novo
review of the record and review of the briefs, summary judgment was proper, for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.

S ee Walton v. Baylor University , No. W-97-CA-264, mem. op
. (W.D.Tex. Sept. 24, 1998).

AFFIRMED
ROBERT MARK PURCHASE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2551

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 10, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Liberty County.

Martin A. Fitzpatrick, Judge.

Robert M. Purchase, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jennifer J. Moore, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, BILBREY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2014314EN.01000401.xml

| 13.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 314/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 314/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

12 September 2014

2014/C 314/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2931 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4437 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79660 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2308 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2089 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2405 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,600 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,88 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1977 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4248 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8507 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4283 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4300 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0223 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5835 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6314 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 338,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1961 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9312 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6248 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 304,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1308 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,897 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,0034 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,631 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9828 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1271 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,5970 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2931

JPY

Japanese yen

138,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4437

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79660

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2308

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2089

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2405

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,600

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,88

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1977

RON

Romanian leu

4,4248

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8507

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4283

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4300

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0223

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5835

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6314

KRW

South Korean won

1 338,42

ZAR

South African rand

14,1961

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9312

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6248

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 304,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1308

PHP

Philippine peso

56,897

RUB

Russian rouble

49,0034

THB

Thai baht

41,631

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9828

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1271

INR

Indian rupee

78,5970

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATESCODE §1350**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies thatto his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal periodended June 30, 2005 of Allstate Life Insurance Company filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of Allstate Life InsuranceCompany.

 
| August 8, 2005 | /s/ Casey J. Sylla                                 |   |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | Casey J. Sylla                                     |
|                | Chairman of the Board and President                |
|                |                                               |
|                |                                               |
|                | /s/ John C. Pintozzi                               |   |
|                | John C. Pintozzi                                   |   |
|                | Senior Vice  President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                     |                                                    |        |  |  |

 

E-5

----
T. O., A Child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-1574

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Henry E. Davis, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2015051EN.01000601.xml

| 13.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 51/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 51/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7370 — Ineos/Styrolution)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 51/05)

On 6 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7370. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7370. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015001EN.01000201.xml

| 6.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 1/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 1/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 January 2015

(2015/C 1/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2043 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,21 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4434 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78000 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4702 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2022 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 9,0420 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,693 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 318,75 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,3053 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,5020 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8332 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4841 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4069 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,3402 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5609 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6000 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 332,24 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0435 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,4759 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6713 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 073,02 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2349 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 53,961 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,4610 |
| THB | Thai baht | 39,690 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2433 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,8537 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,3000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2043

JPY

Japanese yen

145,21

DKK

Danish krone

7,4434

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78000

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4702

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2022

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

9,0420

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,693

HUF

Hungarian forint

318,75

PLN

Polish zloty

4,3053

RON

Romanian leu

4,5020

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8332

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4841

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4069

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,3402

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5609

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6000

KRW

South Korean won

1 332,24

ZAR

South African rand

14,0435

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,4759

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6713

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 073,02

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2349

PHP

Philippine peso

53,961

RUB

Russian rouble

70,4610

THB

Thai baht

39,690

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2433

MXN

Mexican peso

17,8537

INR

Indian rupee

76,3000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**Exhibit 99.1**This document contains certain supplemental financial information, described in the followingexhibit, which has been determined by methods other than Accounting Principles Generally Acceptedin the United States of America (“GAAP”) that management uses in its analysis of the Company’sperformance. The Company’s management believes these non-GAAP financial measures provideinformation useful to investors in understanding the underlying operational performance of theCompany, its business and performance trends and facilitates comparisons with the performance ofothers in the financial services industry.**Supplemental Performance Measurements – Average Tangible Assets, Average Tangible Equity andTangible Book Value**.The information below provides specific definitions of non-GAAP measurements utilized in ouroverview schedule under the financial summary section of Item 2. — Management’s Discussion andAnalysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.Return on average tangible assets and return on average tangible equity are computed, on anannualized basis, as follows:Return on average tangible assets is computed by dividing net income, as reported plusamortization of identifiable intangible assets, net of taxes by average total assets less averagegoodwill and average identifiable intangible assets.Return on average tangible equity is computed by dividing net income, as reported plusamortization of identifiable intangible assets, net of taxes by average total stockholders’equity less average goodwill and average identifiable intangible assets.           **Three Months Ended**   **March 31,**  **March 31,** *(dollars In thousands)* **2006**  **2005** Net Income, as Reported $210,128  $259,035 Add: Amortization of Identifiable Intangible Assets, Net of Taxes  5,847   5,937        Net Income, as Adjusted $215,975  $264,972                 Average Total Assets $57,374,851  $60,206,882 Less: Average Goodwill  5,918,116   5,879,891 Less: Average Identifiable Intangible Assets  110,743   147,596        Average Tangible Assets $51,345,992  $54,179,395                 Average Stockholders’ Equity $8,971,503  $9,017,358 Less: Average Goodwill  5,918,116   5,879,891 Less: Average Identifiable Intangible Assets  110,743   147,596        Average Tangible Equity $2,942,644  $2,989,871        Return on Average Tangible Assets  1.71%  1.98%Return on Average Tangible Equity  29.77%  35.94%Tangible book value is calculated by dividing period end stockholders’ equity, less period endgoodwill and identifiable intangible assets, by period end share outstanding.**TANGIBLE BOOK VALUE**           **Three Months Ended**   **March 31,**  **March 31,** *(In thousands, except ratios and per share amounts)* **2006**  **2005** Period End Stockholders’ Equity $8,945,705  $9,008,191 Less: Goodwill and Identifiable Intangible Assets  6,023,348   6,028,294        Period End Stockholders’ Equity Less Intangible Assets $2,922,357  $2,979,897                 End of Period Shares Outstanding  463,520   476,926 Tangible Book Value $6.30  $6.25 
49
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7668

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

LISA MARIE CASEY, a/k/a Lisa Marie Adams, a/k/a Lisa Marie 

Galliher, a/k/a Lisa Marie Graninger, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western 

District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James C. Turk, Senior 

District Judge. (1:06-cr-00071-jct-mfu-1; 1:08-cv-80057-jctmfu) 

Submitted: January 7, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010 

Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Lisa Marie Casey, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer R. Bockhorst, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Abingdon, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Lisa Marie Casey seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the 

constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or 

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district 

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 

322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have 

independently reviewed the record and conclude Casey has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate 

of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We also deny Casey’s 

motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ENACTED UNDER
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI, Inc.  (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Domenic N. Golato, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted
under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company as of September 30, 2002 (the end of the period covered by the
Report).

Date:  November 14, 2002

                                       /s/  Domenic N. Golato
                                       ------------------------------------
                                            Domenic N. Golato
                                            Senior Vice President & Chief
                                            Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2017

s0124 

# Order

Clerk 

### January 27, 2017

154945(105)

SC: 154945

In re HEARD/BRUCE, Minors. COA: 331676

Wayne CC Family Division:

13

- 511403

- NA

_____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s January 13,

2017 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
# C_2014167EN.01000201.xml

| 4.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7223 — Danish Crown / Sokolow)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 167/02

On 28 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7223. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7223. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
A-S ( D.AS} 

Mr. Salmon: 

REF ID:A67294e 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

DIVISION OF FOREIGN SERVICE ADMINISTRATION 

January 6, 194lt. .. 

rlith reference to your request by telephone for a list 

of the posts in the Foreign Service where .A.Illerican Guards are 

employed, the following statement is subrn.itted: 

Post 

Algr0rs 

Buenos Aires 

La Paz 

Rio de Janeiro 

Santiago 

Bogota 

San Jose 

Habana 

Ciudad Trujillo Q,uito 

San Salvador 

Helsinki 

GuateI!lala 

Port-au-Prince 

Tegucigalpa 

Mexico City 

Tangier 

Managua 

Panama 

Asuncion 

Lima 

Lisbon 

Tenerife 

Stockholm. 

Istanbul 

Montevideo 

Caracas 

Nunber guards 

1 

4 

2 

3 

4 

l 

2 

1 

1 

2 

1 

2* 

2 

l 

2 

8 

l 

l 

2 

2 

3 2** 

1 

3 

1 

2 

5*** 

Total •••••••••••••••• b'O 

pproved for Release by 

SA on 04-09-2014 pursuant 

o E.O. 13526 

Asterisks indicate the following status of 5 guards: * - Two guards for Helsinki not yet· at post (1 en route; 1 awaiting transportation) ** - One guard at Lisbon re~ently appointed is awaiting passport 

and transportation facilities. ***- Two guards assigned to Caracas now en route to post. 

There ~s in addition to the 60 guards listed above, 1 ni~t watchman at Casablanca.. J~f!.:f' FA:EKreis-LGM