The information contained in this spreadsheet was converted from the pdf

version supplied by Carl Weilert. It was part of the development of the article "Utility FGD Design Trends," by Carl Weilert and Emily Meyer, Burns and McDonnell, which appeared in Power Engineering 8-1-2010, available athttp://www.power-eng.com/articles/print/volume-114/issue8/departments/clearing-the_air/utility-fgd-design-trends.html.Facility

Name a Plant Code (ORISPL) a FGD ID b State a Process Type a Absorber Type I b Absorber

Type II b

Lim estone 298 FGD1 TX Wet Lim estone SP Lim estone 298 FGD2 TX Wet Lim estone SP Martin Lake 6146 1 TX Wet Lim estone TR m Martin Lake 6146 2 TX Wet Lim estone TR m Martin Lake 6146 3 TX Wet Lim estone TR m Monticello 6147 3 TX Wet Lim estone SP TR San Miguel 6183 SM--1 TX Wet Lim estone TR m Sandow 6648 4 TX Wet Lim estone SP W A Parish 3470 FGD8 TX Wet Lim estonef SP

**Notes**

a This column is from the 2010 “Emissions ” section of EP A’s Clean Air Markets Division “Data and Maps ” website
b This column is from 2008 EIA--860 data Schedules 6--G & 6--H c This column is from 2008 EIA--860 data "Annual Electric Generator Report" Generator (Existing) File
d 2009 “Emissions ” section of EP A’s Clean Air Markets Division “Data and Maps ” website

e Information is from respective vendor either from direct correspondence or from their website/publications f DOE "Utility

FGD Survey

January -- December 1989" Publication Number ORNL/M--2347

g 2008 “Emissions ” section of EP A’s Clean Air Markets Division “Data and Maps ” website h 2007 “Emissions ” section of EP A’s Clean Air Markets Division “Data and Maps ” website i 2008 EIA 860 data "Annual Electric Generator Report" Generator (Proposed) File j Material information from Stebbins Manufacturing Installation List k Upgrade by

BPE according to BPE l 2005 EIA 767 data Schedule 8 A & 8 B m Authors' correction based on personal knowledge n Facility's Utility's website o EPA's Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category : 2007/2008 Detailed Study Report (Online) p Multiple FGD units are associated with one generator. The value reported is the nameplate capacity for the generator.

**Explanation of Notation:**

**General** FGD Flue Gas Desulfurization Y Yes N No NA Not Applicable NR Not Reported

**Ab sorber Type**  BR Jet Bubbling Reactor CD Circulating Dry Scrubber DCFS Double Contact Flow Scrubber DSI Dry Sorbent Injection PA Packed SD Spray DryerSP Spray

TR Tray VE Venturi

**Sorbent Type** AF Alkaline fly ash LA Lime and alkaline fly ash LF Limestone and alkaline fly ash LI Lime LS Limestone MO Magnesium oxide SA Soda ash SC Sodium carbonate SL Soda liquid

**Ma terial of Construction**  CO Combination CS Carbon Steel FRCS Flakeglass Reinforced Resin Lined Carbon Steel FRP Fiberglass Reinforced Plastic NI Nickel Alloy RLCS Rubber Lined Carbon Steel SS Stainless Steel TL Tile Lined

**Unit Manufacturers** AD Allied AL Alstom AM American Air Filter AP Airpol AV Advatech BPE Babcock Power Environmental BW Babcock and Wilcox CH Chiyoda FMC FMC HI Hitachi HRC Hamon Research Cottrell KE M W Kellogg MHI Mitsubishi Heavy Industries MX Marsulex SHU Saarberg Holter SI Siemens OT OtherSorbent

Type b In-Service Yearb Design

SO 2 Removal Efficiencyb Nameplate

Capacityc Provision

for Bypass b Incorporation

of Spare Module b Manufacturerb Material of Construction Oxidation

Mode

LS 1985 90 893 Y Y AL NI e Forced e LS 1986 90 957 Y Y AL NI e Forced e LS 1977 95 793 Y N HRC FRCS f NR LS 1978 95 793 Y N HRC FRCS f NR LS 1979 95 793 Y N HRC FRCS f NR LS 1978 95 793 Y N MX FRCS f NR LS 1982 94.1 410 N N BW SS m Inhibited e LS 1981 92 591 Y N AL SS e NR LS 1982 85 615 N N MX FRCS f NR

o EPA's Steam Electric Power Generating Point Source Category : 2007/2008 Detailed Study Report (Online) p Multiple FGD units are associated with one generator. The value reported is the nameplate capacity for the generator.