alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,294
<SECURITIES>                                    22,969
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                       963
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,761
<PP&E>                                           9,094
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  43,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,403
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            10
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,294
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    43,320
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                46,979
<CGS>                                            9,581
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,581
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,607
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,494
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  30
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,492
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,066
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             17,791
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,426
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1643

In Re: ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

(1:11-cr-00087-LO-1; 1:11-cr-00348-LO-1; 1:12-cv-00132-LO)

Submitted: October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Alexander Matthews petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion after remand. He seeks an 

order from this court directing the district court to act. We 

find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the 

district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma 

pauperism, deny Matthews’ motion for recusal and judicial 

notice, and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
# C_2014447EN.01000202.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7307 — Electricity Supply Board/Vodafone Ireland/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 447/04)

On 24 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7307. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7307. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014465EN.01000601.xml

| 24.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 465/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 465/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7447 — Telenor/SPH/Schibsted/Naspers Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 465/07)

On 18 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7447. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7447. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
ro ed fo Rele se b NSA on 1 -21-2014 
. I 

- i- jl:<EF ID :A41~90 ..... :i-1'1 

. j - ~·/ 

L/- t 

s- J 7 l~- If 

7- /~ 

q- I~ I 10- :J.t,,.f 

1/- 1t! 

13- 1.S 

- 20- 'J{.p 

;~-'13 
~-&\~~o , ' A.--+- 7 • . .'~ ' . 

»~{r~·. 

T~~
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1
 
                            TICKETMASTER GROUP, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
             (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE INFORMATION)
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                             FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 31,
                                                      -------------------------------------------
                                                         1995            1996            1997
                                                      -----------     -----------     -----------
<S>                                                   <C>             <C>             <C>
Weighted average number of common shares
  outstanding.......................................   15,310,405      15,310,405      17,222,459
Common stock equivalents from outstanding stock
  options...........................................          n/a             n/a          21,167
                                                      -----------     -----------     -----------
                                                       15,310,405      15,310,405      17,243,626
                                                       ==========      ==========      ==========
Net income (loss)...................................  $    (6,678)    $    (8,095)    $     1,792
                                                       ==========      ==========      ==========
Net income (loss) per share.........................  $     (0.44)    $     (0.53)    $      0.10
                                                       ==========      ==========      ==========
</TABLE>
Wash~gton 

' - ' 0, 'REF· ID~A4163743 ·.O 

1'1erry-Go .. Round l"TH~ WASHINGTON POST . . • · . a w ednesaa,., June 10, 1953 B 

N_JTOHe·ldAbletoStallln.vasion 

By Drezo Pearson 

·WHILE THE WORLD has 

• ·, been anxiously watching Kore?" 

Gen. Matt Ridgway reported 

qui!!tlY to the ·:Fentagon on the 

ch an c es of 

holding off !l 

Russian in v a- sion in Europe . . He ,predicted 

\ ,, confi d e n t 1 y 

that the NATO 

forces c o u l d 

'withstand the 

first shock of a Russian >attack 

and could fight a rear-g u a r d 

Peai:son action for" some wee k s. " T h i s would give· the Allies time to · throw in additional reinforceme11ts, . particularly · atomie 

bombers. · 

, RidgWay yiarned, 'however, 

that the 45 NATO divisions are, 

far below the minimum needed· · for · "military security.'; The 

absolute minimum, he said; 

would lie 132. divisions, with 25 

special supporting r.egiments: · The newly appointed Army 

Chief . of .Staff .reported that· 

Russia has four million . inen 

' .... under· a1'm's, organized into t.he 

"most effective ·1and. an'ny in 

the world 'today:~· This is· abol.1t , the same ·size· as the Soviet 

armed forces have been. since 

the. end of :\Vorld War II. However, he stressed that the com- bat effectiveness of these forces 

has :been increasd . 

. · Ridgway also reported that 

.the European Soviet satellites 

have built up between 65 and 70 

divisions, half Of, which are up 

to Soviet standards. The niost 

powerful satellite . army, he 

said, is Bulgaria's. In other 

words, he · warned .that the .. satellites, alone have eriough · ' militacy power ·to· qiatch the 

combined strength of NATO. 

{GEN. Hoy\ S .. Vandenberg 

gave the first ,official tip-off to 

what hitherto has been an official secret-Russia's . growing 

stockpile.of,A-bombs. This was 

· ..one re.aso~ .for.· Vandenberg's 

urging that we not curtail air 

power. , · · ' 

Behind this, iri turn, . is in· 

formation. sent to the White 

House . by the· Atomic Ener'gy . Commission that the Ru&sians 

plan to exp.lode new. atomic 

bombs this summer. · · It's now . beeri three years . since the Ru.ssiaris tested their 

, last atomic weapons, and .'the 

strange. silence has puzzled o.ur · experts. However, the 

White House has been·informed 

the Russians. have deliberately. 

' avoided.' staging any 'tests· big 

enough for our Geiger count-

.' ers to pick :μp. , · Instead; they've been working, 

day and night to co.q.struct big: 

ger atom plilnts; and .some time 

this summer this construction 

program · 'vill be· far ·enough 

;ilong so they' can test a con- siderable numb¢1'_ of' new hombs. 

, 

... : . 

·:..
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

LEANDRO FELIPE REGALADO,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 15-50139

D.C. No. 3:14-cr-01753-BAS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 27, 2016** 

Before: TASHIMA, SILVERMAN, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Leandro Felipe Regalado appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction for importation of cocaine, in violation of 21

U.S.C. §§ 952 and 960. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

dismiss.

FILED

OCT 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Regalado contends that the district court erred by not sua sponte offering

him an opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea after the parties discovered that the

pre-plea criminal history report had mistakenly concluded that he was not a career

offender. The government responds that the appeal waiver in Regalado’s plea

agreement bars this appeal. Reviewing de novo, see United States v. Watson, 582

F.3d 974, 981 (9th Cir. 2009), we conclude that the waiver is enforceable.

Regalado first contends that the waiver is unenforceable because the parties’

mutual mistake of fact rendered his plea involuntary. The written plea agreement

expressly stated that Regalado could be found to be a career offender and

explained the effect that would have on the calculation of his Guidelines range. 

Additionally, at the change of plea hearing, the district court informed Regalado

that the Guidelines calculation could be different from counsel’s estimate and that

the choice of sentence was within the court’s sole discretion. Finally, Regalado

never sought to withdraw his plea in the district court, even after he learned of the

mistake regarding his career offender status. On these facts, we conclude that

Regalado’s plea was knowing and voluntary.

Regalado next contends that the appeal waiver is unenforceable because the

district court violated Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(1)(N) by failing to

confirm that he understood the terms of his waiver. We review for plain error, see

2 15-50139
United States v. Ma, 290 F.3d 1002, 1005 (9th Cir. 2002), and find none. The

court explained to Regalado that he was waiving his right to appeal even if “you

don’t like the sentence that I ultimately give you.” Regalado confirmed that he

understood. Even if the court erred by failing to recite the terms of the waiver

more specifically, that error did not effect Regalado’s substantial rights. See id.

DISMISSED.

3 15-50139
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FERROFLUIDICS CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 28, 1998 AND
ITS CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS THEN ENDED AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY STATEMENT ON FORM 10-Q
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 28, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-28-1998
<CASH>                                       1,335,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,003,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (231,000)
<INVENTORY>                                 13,059,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,578,000
<PP&E>                                      21,489,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (11,923,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,446,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,530,000
<BONDS>                                      5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,744,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (16,288,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,446,000
<SALES>                                     21,016,000<F1>
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,016,000
<CGS>                                       11,174,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,174,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,257,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             463,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,164,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   135,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          2,029,000
<DISCONTINUED>                             (3,204,000)<F1>
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,175,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
<FN>
<F1>RESTATED TO REFLECT THE SYSTEMS DIVISION AS DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 132473(51) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 132473 

 COA: 265914 

Wayne CC: 05-018151-01

MARK ANTHONY QUEEN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 13, 

2007 order is considered, and it is GRANTED. We VACATE our order dated April 13, 

2007. On reconsideration, the application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

reinstatement and consideration of defendant’s claim of appeal and motion for remand. 

Aspects of defendant’s appeal relate to offenses allegedly committed before December 

27, 1994. See People v Monaco, 474 Mich 48 (2006). 

d1010 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2007 

 Clerk
# C_2015047EN.01000201.xml

| 10.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 47/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 47/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 February 2015

(2015/C 47/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1275 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 133,72 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4440 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,74150 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,4685 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0428 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6145 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,720 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,30 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1822 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4308 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8080 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4430 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4094 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7416 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5203 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5282 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 236,75 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0539 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0428 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,7165 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 281,55 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0142 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 50,100 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 74,7335 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,807 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1430 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7073 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 70,0515 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1275

JPY

Japanese yen

133,72

DKK

Danish krone

7,4440

GBP

Pound sterling

0,74150

SEK

Swedish krona

9,4685

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0428

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6145

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,720

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,30

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1822

RON

Romanian leu

4,4308

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8080

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4430

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4094

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7416

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5203

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5282

KRW

South Korean won

1 236,75

ZAR

South African rand

13,0539

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0428

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,7165

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 281,55

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0142

PHP

Philippine peso

50,100

RUB

Russian rouble

74,7335

THB

Thai baht

36,807

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1430

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7073

INR

Indian rupee

70,0515

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015074EN.01000201.xml

| 3.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 74/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 74/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 March 2015

(2015/C 74/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,1227 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 134,47 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4633 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72940 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3436 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0724 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6085 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,488 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,58 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1563 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4418 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8211 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4433 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4025 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,7060 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4907 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,5303 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 235,65 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1442 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,0456 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6755 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 561,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0771 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,528 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 70,0036 |
| THB | Thai baht | 36,297 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2133 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,7816 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 69,5415 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,1227

JPY

Japanese yen

134,47

DKK

Danish krone

7,4633

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72940

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3436

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0724

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6085

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,488

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,58

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1563

RON

Romanian leu

4,4418

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8211

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4433

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4025

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,7060

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4907

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,5303

KRW

South Korean won

1 235,65

ZAR

South African rand

13,1442

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,0456

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6755

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 561,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0771

PHP

Philippine peso

49,528

RUB

Russian rouble

70,0036

THB

Thai baht

36,297

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2133

MXN

Mexican peso

16,7816

INR

Indian rupee

69,5415

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---