alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014447EN.01000301.xml

| 13.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 447/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 447/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7381 — Airbus/Singapore Airlines/AATC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 447/05)

On 8 December 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7381. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7381. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015150EN.01000801.xml

| 7.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/8

---

NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION

(2015/C 150/08)

The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising open competition

EPSO/AD/303/15 — DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION AND MANAGING AID TO NON-EU COUNTRIES (AD 7)

The competition notice is published in 24 languages in Official Journal C 150 A of 7 May 2015
  .

C 150 A of 7 May 2015

Further information can be found on the EPSO website: http://blogs.ec.europa.eu/eu-careers.info/

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,603
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  398,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    361,655
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,398,740
<PP&E>                                       1,665,897
<DEPRECIATION>                                 807,031
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,910,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,550,438
<BONDS>                                        498,072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,295
<OTHER-SE>                                     519,548
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,910,013
<SALES>                                      1,202,732
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,202,732
<CGS>                                        1,030,403
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,030,403
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,335
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,946
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 80,836
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,655
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             56,181
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    56,181
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.41


</TABLE>
May 29, 2015

Mr. Kenneth Leake 14835 S. Boyd Street Sapulpa, OK 74066

Dear Mr. Leake.:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 23, 2015, exemption request on behalf into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1171), but we are unable to pr ocess your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.4

                                    ATTORNEY

         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Laurence Winoker and Glenn P. Dickes or any of them, each acting alone, his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him
and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (the "Form 10-K") under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the
Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this
14th day of March, 2000.

                                            /s/ EDWARD J. LANDAU
                                            --------------------
                                                EDWARD J. LANDAU
Order filed November 23, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00845-CV

____________

RICHARD SAAD, JR., Appellant

V.

VRISELDA R. VALDEZ, ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from the 234th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-17650

O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed November 13, 2015. Our review has determined 

that a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P.

34.5(c). The record does not contain a complete copy of PLAINTIFF’S 

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, 

COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO COUNTER-PLAINTIFFS’ 

MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND PLAINTIFF’S 
TRADITIONAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED JULY 24, 

2014.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s 

record on or before November 30, 2016, containing a complete copy of 

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY 

JUDGMENT, COUNTER-DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO COUNTERPLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND 

PLAINTIFF’S TRADITIONAL MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FILED JULY 24, 2014.

If the omitted item is not part of the case file, the district clerk is directed to 

file a supplemental clerk’s record containing a certified statement that the omitted 

item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
# C_2014381EN.01000202.xml

| 28.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7351 — Henkel/Spotless Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 381/03

On 25 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7351. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7351. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PERSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of I-many, Inc.,
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of I-many, Inc., certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ A. LEIGH POWELL                                                               
|Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
(principal executive officer)     
|                                                                                  
|November 5, 2004                                                                  
|                                                                                  
|/s/ KEVIN M. HARRIS                                                               
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (principal
financial and accounting officer)
|                                                                                  
|November 5, 2004
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2014-NM-162-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
--" . 

--

- -·- , 

, 

- ·, 

REF ID:A66539 .. _ 

SECURITY IFJCATION (Ifnr) 

DISPOSITION FORM 

t-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-'-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 

FILE NO. 

Report of Security Violation No. 154 I SUBJECT 

-r, t-~~~~~~~~~~~..:-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I 

FROM DATE COMMENT NO. 1 

.. -

-~ 

TO 

AJ'BA.-OOT .AFSA-16 29 August 1951 

1. Inasmuch as registration ot document titled Manual ot 

Cryptography tound adrift in AFSA-OOT was cancelled, there is no 

security ~iolation and no further action will be taken. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-08-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

14-6'801-3 U. 8. COYEll:NMINT PRINTING OFFICE 
--

Report of Security Violetion No. 154 

Al'SA-OOT AFS.A-16 29 August 1951 

1. Inasmuch as rog1st.retion of doou.ment titled Jlanual or 

Cryptography found adri:tt in /JSA-OOT was cancelled, there is no 

security violation and no ~urther action will be taken. 

HAL P. CRANE 

Col Arty Chief, Seo Con Div
# C_2015112EN.01000202.xml

| 2.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7553 — PAI/Lion Adventure)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 112/04)

On 25 March 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7553. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7553. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 23, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-1647

Lower Tribunal No. 16-15403

________________

L.C.R., The Mother,

Appellant,

vs.

Department of Children and Families, et al.,

Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Mavel Ruiz,

Judge.

Eugene F. Zenobi, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional, Third Region, and

Kevin Coyle Colbert, Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, for appellee Department of Children and Families; Laura J.

Lee (Sanford), for appellee Guardian ad Litem Program.

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.
“[A] trial court’s determination of dependency is a mixed question of law

and fact, which will be upheld on appeal if the trial court applied the correct law

and its ruling is supported by competent substantial evidence.” J.C. v. Fla. Dep’t

of Children & Family Servs., 937 So. 2d 184, 186 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006). Here, the

trial court applied the correct law, finding the Minor dependent under section

39.501(2), Florida Statutes (2016), and there is competent substantial evidence to

support the trial court’s finding of dependency. This is an extremely unfortunate

situation. The Mother clearly wants to do right by the Minor. In this regard, we

note, as the Guardian Ad Litem referenced in her brief, that a finding of

dependency is not a termination, but an opportunity to restore and hopefully repair

a family in need of assistance. T.R. v. Dep’t of Children & Families, 864 So. 2d

1278, 1280 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

Affirmed.

2
March 2004

                          CODE OF ETHICS

      GraphOn Corporation expects all of its employees, including its principal
executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer,
as well as the members of its board of directors, to act in accordance with the
highest standards of personal and professional integrity in all aspects of their
activities, to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, to deter
wrongdoing and to abide by other policies and procedures adopted by GraphOn that
govern the conduct of its employees and directors. This Code of Ethics is
intended to supplement any other policies and procedures adopted by GraphOn.

      You agree to:

   (a) Engage in and promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical
      handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and
      professional relationships;

   (b) Take all reasonable measures to protect the confidentiality of non-public
      information about GraphOn and its subsidiaries and their customers
      obtained or created in connection with your activities and to prevent the
      unauthorized disclosure of such information unless required by applicable
      law or regulation or legal or regulatory process;

   (c) Produce full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in
      reports and documents that GraphOn and its subsidiaries files with, or
      submits to, the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators
      and in other public communications made by GraphOn and its subsidiaries;

   (d) Comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations, as well
      as the rules and regulations of self-regulatory organizations of which
      GraphOn or its subsidiaries is a member; and

   (e) Promptly report any possible violation of this Code of Ethics to
      GraphOn's Audit Committee.

      You are prohibited from directly or indirectly taking any action to
fraudulently influence, coerce, manipulate or mislead GraphOn's or its
subsidiaries' independent public auditors for the purpose of rendering the
financial statements of GraphOn or its subsidiaries misleading.

      You understand that you will be held accountable for your adherence to
this Code of Ethics. Your failure to observe the terms of this Code of Ethics
may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of
employment. Violations of this Code of Ethics may also constitute violations of
law and may result in civil and criminal penalties for you, your supervisors
and/or GraphOn.

      If you have any questions regarding the best course of action in a
particular situation, you should promptly contact GraphOn's Audit Committee.You
may choose to remain anonymous in reporting any possible violation of this Code
of Ethics.
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Metro Health Products, Inc., as Assignee of MICHAEL DOUGLAS, Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Nationwide Ins., Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Carol Ruth Feinman, J.), entered September 8, 2014. The order granted defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.</p><p>ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.</p><p>For the reasons stated in <i>Metro Health Prods., Inc., as Assignee of Arthur Louis v Nationwide Ins.</i> (52 Misc 3d 138[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 51122[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th &amp; 13th Jud Dists 2016]), the order is affirmed.</p><p>Elliot, J.P., Pesce and Aliotta, JJ., concur.</p><br>Decision Date: November 17, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
Motion Granted and Order filed March 2 3 , 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14 - 21 - 00122 - CV

____________ TRADE EXPLORATION CORP., BRYAN C. WAGNER AND DUER

WAGNER III , Appellant s/Cross - Appellees

V. EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION , Appellee /Cross - Appellant

On Appeal from the 189th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2009 - 60726



### ORDER This appeal is related to an appeal previously filed in this court: No. 14

- 19

- 00 091

- CV, ExxonMobil Corp. v. Trade Exploration Corp
. Appell ants /cross

appell ees filed an unopposed motion asking that the record from the previous appeal be transferred into this appeal. The motion is granted. The clerk of this court is directed to file a copy of the appellat e record in appeal number 14

- 19

- 00091

- CV into this appeal. PER CURIAM Panel c onsists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Jewell and Hassan.