alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014407EN.01000301.xml

| 15.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 407/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 407/3

---

Inapplicability of the Regulation to a notified operation

(Case M.7253 — Groupe Lagardère/SNCF Participations/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 407/02

On 25 July 2014, the Commission decided that the notified operation in the above case does not fall within the scope of the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1) because it does not constitute a concentration within the meaning of Article 3 of the said Regulation. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(a) of the Regulation. The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7253. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7253. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
| 1.   | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insituform Technologies, Inc.; |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ J. Joseph Burgess                                                               |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | J. Joseph BurgessPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0137. SOLOMON JACKSON v. THE STATE.

On June 7, 2016, the trial court entered an order denying Solomon Jackson’s

motion to vacate a void and illegal sentence. On October 13, 2016, Jackson filed an

application for discretionary appeal in this Court. Pretermitting whether Jackson had

a right to appeal the order, his application is untimely. An application for

discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the order or judgment

to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are

jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made in

compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). This

application, filed 128 days after entry of the challenged order, is untimely and is

therefore DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/08/2016

November 08, 2016
Exhibit 32.2



Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.



Certification of Principal Financial Officer



I, William T. McGann, Controller and Treasurer of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



To the best of my knowledge and
belief, based upon a review of this annual report on Form 10-K of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2003, and, except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent report:



| |  | this annual report of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | the information contained in this annual report on Form 10-K of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2003 fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/    William T. McGannWilliam T. McGann Controller and
Treasurer  March 29,
2004
# C_2014410EN.01000201.xml

| 18.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 November 2014

2014/C 410/03

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2496 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 145,30 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4434 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79890 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2449 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2013 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4440 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,701 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,01 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2238 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4280 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7854 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4312 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4133 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6899 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5775 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6217 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 370,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8937 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6523 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6740 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 240,70 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1874 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,189 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 59,2177 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,943 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2631 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9539 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,2603 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2496

JPY

Japanese yen

145,30

DKK

Danish krone

7,4434

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79890

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2449

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2013

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4440

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,701

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,01

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2238

RON

Romanian leu

4,4280

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7854

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4312

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4133

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6899

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5775

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6217

KRW

South Korean won

1 370,14

ZAR

South African rand

13,8937

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6523

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6740

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 240,70

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1874

PHP

Philippine peso

56,189

RUB

Russian rouble

59,2177

THB

Thai baht

40,943

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2631

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9539

INR

Indian rupee

77,2603

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
REF ID:A39721 : ~ . 

. f 

IN REPLY 

REFER TO •• -,.. 

WAR DEPARTM.ENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

Sept. 29 1 1936. 

Memorandum For Mr. William F. Friedman and Mr. Frank B. Rowlett, 

w. P. and T. Division, 

Office of the Chief Signal Oftieer. 

SUbject: Improvemen~ in Cryptographs, 

Patent Applieation Ser. No, 70,412. 

1. This will report the first oftieial action from the Patent 

Office i:m. the matter of your. abow entitled application. Copy of the 

Exeminer's communication dated June 24, 1936, is transmitted herewith 

f'or your files together with printed copies of' the four united states 

patents cited as reterenees. 

2. Witk sp&oial reference to the retuirement tor division, it 

ia regarded as important, it possible, to maintain a generie clailli or 

cla1ms in thia ease to the and that by so tlCJing 19 •"Y also be able to 

retain speeitie .el.aims to three torma or motiricatioas of the inventio:m.. 

It :ls 8\lggestei ·that our eonsiderat14!H1 of this retuiremen.t be very care• 

tully made "1th a view to showi:Rg by pNper argument, it the eireunstanees 

will permi t 9 that at least oae broad claim ge:a~rie 11•·· all tornm may be 

patentably distinguished trom tae art cite4. Inciden~~ly, eonsiderati0a 

should be given to tbe question of whether or not the Examiner is right 

in his grouping of the specific claims as indicated under II and III, 

page 2 of the official letter. 

3. As to the grounds of rejection of the various claims by .. . the Examiner, it appears desirable that all of the criticisms and gretuade 

of rejection be diseussed·at a conference in advance ot the p:reparatio• 

of a formal response to the oftie ial aetion; whic:h will also afford an 

opportunity to go into all pba.ses of the ease at tJais stage. 

4, You are requested in d,ue eourse to sub.mi t a memorandum 

discussing the various reterenee patents· ani bri11ledi•g out the differene4(s 

and advantages in favor of the· present invention over the diselosures ot··. · 

·said :pateats• 

SE6R·S., .. _ ...... -~· ... :,~· .. . . ... . 

De_cla_ssj.fie"d and c;ippmved for release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pyn~uant to E;.9' .. :· \ · ... · ~ · ,· 

... ~ .... • • ·~··::.,.."·· ... ·ii:,;.. ,' ·~·.:.:. •'··~ , ,.,L,• .. :. .. :, .. ::~: ... , •, .. • •. ·:._·· .... o11t. .. .Z:...'_: •..• •·.: .... ~~ .... ~.~ ·-:-~ .... '1.~ •• :o" ': .. ~~- :it, ... _·,:·."~:''' 
REF ID:A39721 

• 

5. A 'full response.to the official action must be on file in 

the Patent Office not later tban Decemb~,£~, 1935, and a conference 

may be arranged at your convenience and~a·COrii)>etent time to permit 

the preparation of our response in advance of the critical date. 

By order of the Chief Signal Officer. 

Charles A. Rowe. 

Encl. Patents Section, Signal Corps. 

'· " .... ~ .. ;, I; 

'\ ·- •.
<PAGE>



                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                                JUMBOSPORTS INC.

                SCHEDULE  II -  VALUATION  AND  QUALIFYING  ACCOUNTS  Year Ended
                          January 31, 1997




<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Additional
                                   Beginning  Charge to Cost                  Ending
                                    Balance    and Expense    Deductions (1)  Balance
                                   ---------  --------------  --------------  -------
<S>                                    <C>        <C>             <C>          <C>
Year ended January 31, 1997
  Allowance for doubtful accounts      --         $  273          --           $ 273
</TABLE>


     (1) Write-offs and recoveries



                                      E-22
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 1, 2017

No. 04-17-00050-CV

IN RE Jane SPERBER

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

On January 30, 2017, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for 

emergency stay. Relator has since withdrawn the motion for emergency stay. This court is of 

the opinion that a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further 

consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real parties in interest 

may file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus in this court no later than 

February 16, 2017. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

52.4. 

It is so ORDERED on February 1, 2017.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _______________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2016-PC-1067, styled In the Estate of Matthew A. Sperber, Deceased, 

pending in the Probate Court No 1, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kelly Cross presiding.
# C_2014297EN.01000101.xml

| 4.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 September 2014

(2014/C 297/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3151 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,11 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4476 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79855 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1969 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2078 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1605 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,658 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,02 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1905 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4043 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8427 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4094 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4336 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,1923 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5802 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6469 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,18 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0505 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,0772 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6210 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 472,66 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1844 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,395 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,4385 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,140 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9397 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2022 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,4518 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3151

JPY

Japanese yen

138,11

DKK

Danish krone

7,4476

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79855

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1969

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2078

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1605

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,658

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,02

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1905

RON

Romanian leu

4,4043

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8427

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4094

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4336

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,1923

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5802

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6469

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,18

ZAR

South African rand

14,0505

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,0772

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6210

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 472,66

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1844

PHP

Philippine peso

57,395

RUB

Russian rouble

48,4385

THB

Thai baht

42,140

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9397

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2022

INR

Indian rupee

79,4518

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

       
<ARTICLE>5
<MULTIPLIER>1000
<S>                                <C>            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      YEAR           YEAR 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  SEP-30-1996    SEP-30-1995
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1996    SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                    199            205
<SECURITIES>                                0              0
<RECEIVABLES>                          17,575         17,919
<ALLOWANCES>                                0              0
<INVENTORY>                            70,914         72,156
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       91,296         93,201
<PP&E>                                 13,362         15,269
<DEPRECIATION>                              0              0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        108,958        110,480
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  34,566         37,472
<BONDS>                                     0              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0              0
<PREFERRED>                                 0              0
<COMMON>                                   46             44
<OTHER-SE>                             33,499         31,640
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          108,958        108,958
<SALES>                               221,371        224,393
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      221,371        224,393
<CGS>                                 130,435        134,981
<TOTAL-COSTS>                          84,041         87,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      4,408          4,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         3,007        (1,747)
<INCOME-TAX>                            1,148          (370)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,859        (1,377)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0              0
<CHANGES>                                   0              0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,859        (1,377)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             .41          (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             .41          (.30)
        

</TABLE>
petition for exemption/rulemaking

Prisma areal photography

sean andrew goodwin

9910 ne 135th pl kirkland wa 98034

425-877-6140

seangoodwin17@gmail.com

section 333

i am asking for the exemption to fly for real-estate advertising.

if granted i will be using my drone to the safest possible. i would be using the drone for 

the purpose of aerial photography advertising. i will be taking certain safety measures 

every time I’m about to fly. before even flying i would

-check the area i am flying in

-log were/when/weather/signiture

-make sure people aren’t present in the area I’m flying in, and if so if it would be okay 

with me flying around them.

-check the status of my drones parts,(legs, propellers, antennas, camera, ect.

-fly the route i planned with precision

-saftly land the drone

-turn off drone and store away.

i myself would be the only one flying this drone and only for the purpose of work.

i recently have over 50 hours of flight time with zero accidents or fatalities.

i would take every percussion with this drone and never abuse the privilege of using it.i 

would not fly in weather that could cause an accident, thus meaning if there is poor 

visibility, no visibility, winds are to strong, rain, snow, and any other natural occurance i 

will not be flying for my safety and the safety of others.

here are the specs of the drone i would be using.

Specs:

Cameras: Compatible with GoPro® HERO3, 3+ and 4; optimized for HERO3+ and 4

Streaming video quality: 720p

Flight time: 25 minutes; 20 minutes with payload*

Range: .5 miles** (.8 km)
Max speed: 55 mph (89 km/h)

Max ascent speed: 10 m/s in stabilize mode; 5 m/s in “fly” mode

Max descent speed: ditto

Max payload: 420 g

Max altitude: 400 ft per FAA regulation, user adjustable (122 m)

Motors: 880 kV

Propellers: 10′′ diameter 4.5′′ pitch self-tightening (24 cm diameter 144 cm pitch); 

glass-reinforced nylon

Autopilot: Pixhawk 2

Software: APM:Copter

Communication: 3DR Link secure WiFi network

Frequency: 2.4 GHz

Weight: 3.3 lbs. (1.5 kg) / 3.9 lbs. (1.8 kg) with GoPro® and Solo Gimbal

Dimensions: 10 in. tall (25 cm), 18 in. (46 cm) motor-to-motor

Flight battery: Lithium polymer 5200 mAh 14.8 Vdc

Battery charge time: ~1.5 hours

Controller battery: 2600 mAh 7.2 Vdc rechargeable lithium ion

App requirements: iOS 8.0 or later / Android 4.3 or later

*Flight time varies with payload, wind conditions, elevation, temperature, humidity, flying 

style and pilot skill. Listed flight time applies to elevations less than 2,000 ft above sea 

level.

**Depending on environmental conditions; controller is expandable, allowing us or third 

parties to amp up the range in the future.
Solo Smart Battery:

Rechargeable lithium polymer (Li-Po)

5200 mAh

14.8 Vdc

Weight: 1 lb. (.5 kg)

Solo Gimbal:

Three-axis stabilization

Fully compatible with 3DR Solo and GoPro HERO3+ and HERO4; camera charging and 

stabilization only with HERO3

HDMI video output

Wireless software upgrade through Solo

Controllable range: 0° to -90° pitch
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver 132473(51) Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 132473 COA: 265914 Wayne CC: 05-018151-01 MARK ANTHONY QUEEN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for r econsideration of this Court’s April 13, 2007 order is considered, and it is GRANTE D. We VACATE our order dated April 13, 2007. On reconsideration, th e application for leave to appeal the September 21, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for
reinstatement and consideration of defendant’ s claim of appeal and motion for remand. Aspects of defendant’s appeal relate to o ffenses allegedly comm itted before December 27, 1994. See People v Monaco , 474 Mich 48 (2006).

d1010 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 17, 2007

Clerk