alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                        

                                                       EXHIBIT 27 
                                                                       
                  IGI, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                   FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                         (Unaudited)

This Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the June 30,
1997 Consolidated Financial Statements and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1000       
       
<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>          DEC-31-97
<PERIOD-END>               JUN-30-97
<CASH>                           278
<SECURITIES>                       0 
<RECEIVABLES>                  8,438  
<ALLOWANCES>                     303   
<INVENTORY>                   10,552   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              20,203   
<PP&E>                        19,569              
<DEPRECIATION>                 9,621   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                33,747  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         16,733
<BONDS>                            0   
<COMMON>                          96 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0   
<PREFERRED>                        0      
<OTHER-SE>                         0 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  33,747 
<SALES>                       18,320  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              18,320   
<CGS>                          8,318  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                  7,941   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0     
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               939  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                1,122   
<INCOME-TAX>                     404   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              718   
<DISCONTINUED>                     0       
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0    
<CHANGES>                          0     
<NET-INCOME>                     718   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                    .08    
<EPS-DILUTED>                    .08                              
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 12
<TABLE>
                       Fleming Companies, Inc.
           Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<CAPTION>
                                              16 Weeks Ended
                                        April 18,       April 19,
(In thousands of dollars)                 1998            1997
<S>                                     <C>             <C>
Earnings:
  Pretax income                         $31,375         $11,202
  Fixed charges, net                     62,428          60,562

Total earnings                          $93,803         $71,764

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                      $51,202         $48,822
  Portion of rental charges
    deemed to be interest                11,095          11,627
  Capitalized interest                        -               -

     Total fixed charges                $62,297         $60,449

  Ratio of earnings
    to fixed charges                       1.51            1.19
</TABLE>


"Earnings" consists of income before income taxes and fixed charges excluding
capitalized interest.  Capitalized interest amortized during the respective
periods is added back to earnings.

"Fixed charges, net" consists of interest expense, an estimated amount of
rental expense which is deemed to be representative of the interest factor and
amortization of capitalized interest.

The pro forma ratio of earnings to fixed charges is omitted as it is not
applicable.
# C_2015115EN.01000301.xml

| 10.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 115/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 115/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

9 April 2015

(2015/C 115/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0774 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 129,22 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4717 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72680 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3421 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0447 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6620 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,378 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 297,20 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0167 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3975 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7915 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3951 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3493 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,3500 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4188 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4586 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 175,39 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 12,7006 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,6863 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5955 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 889,01 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9060 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 47,904 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 55,9990 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,048 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,2681 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,0549 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 67,0115 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0774

JPY

Japanese yen

129,22

DKK

Danish krone

7,4717

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72680

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3421

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0447

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6620

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,378

HUF

Hungarian forint

297,20

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0167

RON

Romanian leu

4,3975

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7915

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3951

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3493

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,3500

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4188

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4586

KRW

South Korean won

1 175,39

ZAR

South African rand

12,7006

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,6863

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5955

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 889,01

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9060

PHP

Philippine peso

47,904

RUB

Russian rouble

55,9990

THB

Thai baht

35,048

BRL

Brazilian real

3,2681

MXN

Mexican peso

16,0549

INR

Indian rupee

67,0115

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2015207EN.01000301.xml

| 24.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/3

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7640 — LBO France/IKKS)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 207/02)

On 17 June 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7640. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7640. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014187EN.01000201.xml

| 19.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 June 2014

2014/C 187/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3563 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4563 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80050 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0070 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2180 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1695 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,481 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,36 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1444 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3987 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9086 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4525 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4742 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5132 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5646 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6986 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 386,42 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5885 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4506 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5780 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 251,79 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3852 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,782 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,8889 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,093 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0657 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7512 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,8256 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3563

JPY

Japanese yen

138,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4563

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80050

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0070

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2180

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1695

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,481

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,36

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1444

RON

Romanian leu

4,3987

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9086

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4525

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4742

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5132

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5646

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6986

KRW

South Korean won

1 386,42

ZAR

South African rand

14,5885

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4506

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5780

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 251,79

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3852

PHP

Philippine peso

59,782

RUB

Russian rouble

46,8889

THB

Thai baht

44,093

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0657

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7512

INR

Indian rupee

81,8256

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FORM
10Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       5,187,974
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       8,421,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             8,190,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      10,742,694
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        10,769,413
<LOANS>                                     57,728,452
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,128,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              93,319,295
<DEPOSITS>                                  80,409,300
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            676,983
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,650,161
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,582,851
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              93,319,295
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              3,127,713
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              312,055
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               531,534
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,971,302
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             922,575
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             922,575
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,048,727
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  100,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,827,974
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,364,857
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,364,857
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   794,808
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        1
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.717
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  3,068
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,070,318
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   43,000
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,128,716
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           100,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALFRED BARR,

Appellant,

v.

BEAZER PREOWNED HOMES II, LLC,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-20

February 2, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Frances M. 

Perrone, Judge.

Alfred Barr, pro se.

Jean M. Henne of Jean M. Henne P.A., Winter Haven, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, KELLY, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Thanks for the return call. 

 

Since I'm writing an email, I'll just ask our question and then if we need a follow-up call, I'll let you know. 

 

On page 24028, middle column, above Table 78, there's a discussion of EPA's envisioned use of an additional scrubber 

vessel. We have two questions about this section, answers to which will help us develop our comments.. 

 

1. Can you direct us to documents in the docket that you relied on to come up with the proposed emission rate of 0.08 

#/MMBtu. We could not find them, but I see some are copyrighted, so I don't know if some of the backup we're looking for 

might be in that group. 

 

2. How is EPA envisioning that we would use an additional scrubber vessel? As a spare to be rotated in and out for 

cleaning, meaning three vessels would be in operation at full load? Or as a fourth operational vessel to be utilized 

continuously except for when it's off for cleaning? 

 

I hope your travels back to Denver from the public hearings were uneventful. 

 

Thanks 

 

Jim 

 

The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient

(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering 

it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any 

review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 

communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete the original message.

Question 

Parker, James M 

to: 

Vanessa Hinkle 

05/09/2012 09:24 AM 

Cc: 

Aaron Worstell 

Hide Details 

From: "Parker, James M" <jmparker@pplweb.com>

To: Vanessa Hinkle/R8/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: Aaron Worstell/R8/USEPA/US@EPA 

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\vhinkle\Local Settings\Temp\notes7A42A6\~web9430.htm 7/17/2012
THOMAS NOLAN, SUCCESSOR 

TRUSTEE OF THE EARLENE S. 

NOLAN GRANTOR TRUST 

U/T/A 12/17/04,

Petitioner,

v.

CYNTHIA N. STEPHENS AND 

BARRY E. DICKSON, JR., IN RE: 

THE GUARDIANSHIP OF 

EARLENE S. NOLAN, AN 

ALLEGED INCAPACITATED 

PERSON,

Respondents.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-2904

Opinion filed July 21, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Robert O. Beasley and Phillip A. Pugh of Litvak Beasley & Wilson, LLP, 

Pensacola, for Petitioner.

John Glassman and Lois B. Lepp, Pensacola, for Respondents (no appearances).

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks certiorari review of Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Petition 

to Determine Incapacity and an Order Approving Emergency Petition to Continue 
2

Trial. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate that the order results in irreparable harm that 

cannot be adequately remedied on appeal following rendition of a final order. 

Accordingly, the petition is dismissed.

ROBERTS, C. J., THOMAS and RAY, JJ., CONCUR.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


We have audited the consolidated statements of operations and retained earnings
(deficit) and changes in financial position of Corel Corporation for the year
ended November 30, 1997. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain
reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the results of operations and the changes in its financial
position for the year ended November 30, 1997 in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.

Generally accepted accounting principles in Canada differ in some respects from
those applicable in the United States. (note 10).




Chartered Accountants


Ottawa, Canada
January 16, 1998
(except as to Note 12 which
is at February 23, 1998)


                                     F-64
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2292 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to study the potential consequences and benefits of amending the Computer Fraud and Abuse 

Act to allow private companies to take proportional actions in response 

to an unlawful network breach. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. DAINES (for himself and Mr. WHITEHOUSE) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to study 

the potential consequences and benefits of amending the 

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act to allow private companies to take proportional actions in response to an unlawful network breach. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Study on Cyber-Attack 

5 Response Options Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2292 IS

1 SEC. 2. STUDY RELATING TO CONSEQUENCES AND BENE2 FITS OF AMENDING THE CFAA. 

3 (a) STUDY.—The Secretary of Homeland Security, in 

4 consultation with other Federal agencies as appropriate, 

5 shall conduct a study on the potential benefits and risks 

6 of amending section 1030 of title 18, United States Code 

7 (commonly known as the ‘‘Computer Fraud and Abuse 

8 Act’’), to allow private entities to take proportional actions 

9 in response to an unlawful network breach, subject to 

10 oversight and regulation by a designated Federal agency. 

11 (b) REPORT.— 

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 180 days 

13 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Sec14 retary of Homeland Security shall submit a report 

15 on the findings of the study conducted under sub16 section (a), including any recommendations, to Con17 gress. 

18 (2) REQUIRED CONTENTS.—The report re19 quired under paragraph (1) shall— 

20 (A) address any impact on national secu21 rity and foreign affairs; and 

22 (B) include recommendations for— 

23 (i) which Federal agency or agencies 

24 may authorize proportional actions by pri25 vate entities; 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2292 IS

1 (ii) what level of certainty regarding 

2 the identity of the attacker is needed be3 fore such actions would be authorized; 

4 (iii) which entities would be allowed to 

5 take such actions and under what cir6 cumstances; 

7 (iv) what actions would be permis8 sible; and 

9 (v) what safeguards should be in 

10 place. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2014356EN.01000601.xml

| 9.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 356/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 356/6

---

Special Report No 15/2014 ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’

2014/C 356/05

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 15/2014 ‘The External Borders Fund has fostered financial solidarity but requires better measurement of results and needs to provide further EU added value’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors' website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide De Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| e-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide De Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

e-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
# C_2015248EN.01000101.xml

| 29.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 248/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 248/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7664 — Schibsted Distribusjon/Amedia Distribusjon/Helthjem)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 248/01)

On 22 July 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes;

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7664. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7664. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---