alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Hello, this is [INTERVIEWER NAME] calling from Abt Associates on behalf of the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. I am calling about the Pressed Wood 

Manufacturing Industry Survey that EPA sent you. EPA sent a letter to you last week 

asking you to please return the completed survey by October 8th. 

A. Have you received this letter? 

Yes__ No___

[If no] The letter asked you to please return your survey by October 8th, and 

asked you to complete only questions 9, 14, and 15 if you do not have time to

complete the whole survey. Would you like me to send you a copy of this letter?

__________________________________________________________________

B. Will you be able to return the completed survey by October 8th? 

Complete Survey__ 

Partially Complete Survey (9, 14, 15) ___ 

No___

[If yes] Thank you for participating in EPA’s survey.

C. [If will not return] Can you answer 4 short questions about your facility over the 

phone – it should only take a few minutes? 

D. [If no] Can you at least confirm the product that your facility manufacturers for me?
Questions

1. Which of the following composite wood products are produced at your facility?

(a) Particleboard

(b) MDF

(c) Stock HWPW Panels

(d) Products defined as Laminated Products under CARB

(e) Other Composite wood products exempt from CARB requirements: Please 

list:_______________________________________________________.

2. In the 5-year period from 2005 through 2009, what was the average annual total production for 

each product? (Please specify the basis)

______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________

2CBI. Would you like us to consider your average annual production to be TSCA confidential 

business information?

___ Yes

___ No

3. {Only PB, MDF, and HWPW} If Congress had not passed the federal standards for 

formaldehyde in composite wood products this past July, once CARB Phase 2 went into effect 

would you have produced: 

(a) only product that is certified with CARB, 

(b) only product that is not certified with CARB, or 

(c) some CARB certified product and some product that is not certified with CARB?

4. (If c) What would you have expected the percentage of your production that is compliant with 

CARB Phase 2 to be?

3&4 CBI. Would you like us to consider your responses about CARB compliance to be TSCA 

confidential business information?

___ Yes

___ No

That’s all the questions I have. Thank you for participating in EPA’s survey.
# EXHIBIT 32.4

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 28, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Barry Zwarenstein, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Barry Zwarenstein
Barry Zwarenstein
Chief Financial Officer
May 10, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Iomega Corporation and will be retained by
Iomega Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14359]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
RENEWABLE NUTRIENTS, LLC. of PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINA, an exclusive 
license to U.S. Patent No. 8,906,332, ``GASEOUS AMMONIA REMOVAL 
SYSTEM,'' issued on DECEMBER 9, 2014 and U.S. Patent Application Serial 
No. 14/528,614, ``GASEOUS AMMONIA REMOVAL SYSTEM,'' filed on OCTOBER 
30, 2014.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mojdeh Bahar of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
these inventions are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license these inventions as RENEWABLE NUTRIENTS, LLC. of 
PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINA has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-06312 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
#### Markwell, Plaintiff in error, vs. Pereles and another, Defendants in error.

*December 17, 1896*

January *12, 1897.*

*Practice on writ of error.*

The occasion for a motion to modify a judgment having been removed by the reversal of the judgment, a writ of error to review the order denying it will be dismissed.

EeRob to review an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: D. H. Johnson, Circuit Judge.

*Writ dismissed.*

For the defendants in error there was a brief by Winkler, *Flanders,*Smith, *Bottum & Vilas.*

Pinney, J.

This is a writ of error to reverse an order, made after judgment in a *habeas corpus*case, denying a motion to modify such judgment. The judgment in that case having been reversed, there is no occasion for further prosecution of this writ, and it is therefore dismissed.

*By the*Court.— It is so ordered.
# C_2014232EN.01000102.xml

| 18.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7222 — Enercon Independent Power Producer/Gothaer Leben Renewables/Skogberget Vind)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 232/02

On 9 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7222. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7222. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit
                                                                            23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

GraphOn Corporation
Santa Cruz, California

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-156229, 333-145284, 333-119402, 333-107336,
333-40174 and 333-88255) of GraphOn Corporation of our report dated March 31,
2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this
Form 10-K.


/s/ Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP
-------------------------------
Macias Gini & O'Connell LLP
Sacramento, California


March 31, 2009
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2365 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify the Government share 

of the cost of certain planning activities, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2021 

Mr. OSSOFF introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify the Government share of the cost of certain planning activities, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Transit Planning 

5 Support Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PLANNING PROGRAMS. 

7 Section 5305 of title 49, United States Code, is 

8 amended by striking subsection (f) and inserting the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(f) GOVERNMENT SHARE OF COSTS.— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2365 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in para2 graph (2)(A), the Government share of the cost of 

3 an activity funded using amounts made available 

4 under this section may not exceed 80 percent of the 

5 cost of the activity unless the Secretary determines 

6 that it is in the interests of the Government— 

7 ‘‘(A) not to require a State or local match; 

8 or 

9 ‘‘(B) to allow a Government share greater 

10 than 80 percent. 

11 ‘‘(2) CERTAIN ACTIVITIES.— 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The Government 

13 share of the cost of an activity funded using 

14 amounts made available under this section shall 

15 be not less than 90 percent for an activity that 

16 assists parts of an urbanized area or rural area 

17 with lower population density or lower average 

18 income levels compared to— 

19 ‘‘(i) the applicable urbanized area; 

20 ‘‘(ii) the applicable rural area; 

21 ‘‘(iii) an adjoining urbanized area; or 

22 ‘‘(iv) an adjoining rural area. 

23 ‘‘(B) REPORT.—A State or metropolitan 

24 planning organization that carries out an activ25 ity described in subparagraph (A) with an inVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:18 Jul 16, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2365.IS S2365

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2365 IS

1 creased Government share described in that 

2 subparagraph shall report to the Secretary, in 

3 a form as determined by the Secretary, how the 

4 increased Government share for transportation 

5 planning activities benefits commuting and 

6 other essential travel in parts of the applicable 

7 urbanized area or rural area described in sub8 paragraph (A) with lower population density or 

9 lower average income levels.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2158 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 270
117th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2158

                          [Report No. 117-71]

To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
                              Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2021

Mr. Markey (for himself and Ms. Warren) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                           February 10, 2022

               Reported by Mr. Manchin, with an amendment
  [Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
                              Commission.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
Commission Reauthorization Act''.

<DELETED>SEC. 2. CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE ADVISORY 
              COMMISSION.</DELETED>

<DELETED>    Effective September 26, 2018, section 8(a) of Public Law 
87-126 (16 U.S.C. 459b-7(a)) is amended in the second sentence by 
striking ``2018'' and inserting ``2029''.</DELETED>

SEC. 2. CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE ADVISORY COMMISSION.

    Effective September 26, 2018, section 8 of Public Law 87-126 (16 
U.S.C. 459b-7) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), in the second sentence, by striking 
        ``2018'' and inserting ``2029'';
            (2) by striking subsection (g); and
            (3) by redesignating subsection (h) as subsection (g).
                                                       Calendar No. 270

117th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2158

                          [Report No. 117-71]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 
                              Commission.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           February 10, 2022

                       Reported with an amendment
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Arc Communications Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned principal financial officer of the Company hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of
and for the periods covered in the Report.


/s/ Michael Rubel
-------------------------------
    Michael Rubel
    Principal Financial Officer
    Arc Communications Inc.


March 29, 2004
Exhibit 10.13

SALARIES AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Base Salaries

|Name and Principal Position                                                |  | Base Salary as of March 1, 2007
(on an annualized basis) |         | Base Salary beginning April 1, 2007
(on an annualized basis)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------- | ------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|John W. Elias
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer |  | $                                                        | 350,000 |                                                             
|Michael G. Long
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       |  | $                                                        | 227,000 | (1)                                                         
|John O. Tugwell
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer       |  | $                                                        | 235,000 | (1)                                                         

---

Certain Other Compensation

Executive officers may receive awards, from time to time, under the Incentive Plan of Edge Petroleum Corporation, as amended and restated, and participate in an
annual cash bonus plan, which is described in Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed on March 12, 2007. Messrs. Long and Tugwell also
participate in the Company's 401(k) plan, on the same basis as other employees, pursuant to which certain matching contributions are made by the Company. In the case of Mr. Elias, the Company
pays the premiums on term life insurance. The Company's proxy statement for its annual meeting for 2007 contained, and its proxy statement for its annual meeting for 2008 will contain, additional
information regarding compensation of executive officers.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1

SOHU.COM INC.

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sohu.com Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, certify, pursuant to U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company as of March 31, 2010 and results of operations of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2010.



/s/ Charles ZhangCharles Zhang, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman of the Board of DirectorsMay 7, 2010
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 23, 2009

s0316 

# Order

March 23, 2009

137452

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137452 COA: 284560 Wayne CC: 05-000893 BISHOP LUTHER EADY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 2, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3


                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
Baltic Communications Limited:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated March 30, 1999,
relating to the balance sheets of Baltic Communications Limited as of December
31, 1998 and 1997, and the related statements of operations, shareholder's
equity, and cash flows for the years ended 1998 and 1997, and the nine months
ended December 31, 1996, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form
10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31, 1998 of PLD Telekom
Inc.

Our report dated March 30, 1999 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company's parent, PLD Telekom Inc. (PLD) does not presently have
sufficient funds on hand to meet its current debt obligations. The Company is a
guarantor of such obligations. PLD's failure to make payment in full when
required could result in a claim being made against the company under its
guaranty and a cross-default under and acceleration of other debt obligations
for which the Company is also a guarantor. These factors raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of
this uncertainty.




                                             KPMG


St. Petersburg, Russia
August 27, 1999
# CA2014340EN.01000301.xml

| 30.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 340/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 340/3

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 340 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 293 | (NL) |
| 295 | (MT) |
| 297 | |
| 299 | |
| 304 | |
| 321 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 325 | (SL) |
| 332 | |
| 334 | |
| 340 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

293

(NL)

295

(MT)

297

299

304

321

(DE/EN/FR)

325

(SL)

332

334

340

---
ROUTINE 

9:CRET AGI NR: · ¢6715 

. ~~M : SUSLO LONDON ACT: P/P 1 ... 4 

DO/PROO 13 

S/ASST lli I NF'O: V/DIR 5 

-·:1 : DI RN$A 

l'.:3 NR: LW 343 

'T3 : 18¢917z MAY 54 

DCS 6 

C/S 1 

AG 8-11 

115 12 

REUR WL 252. PLEASE SEE Tl-£ TU.£5 (LONDON) 18 MAY WHICH H~S 

3 COLUMN ARTICLE GIVING DETAILS PETROVS LIFE AND EXPERIENC!.,. 

MY RECOLLECTION PROD GETS AIRMAIL COPY THE TIMES 

t~~;\ H 5 NOTE : WL 252 I S AGO 11224, OR I G P /P., 

!f!.Tf: RECD: 181314z MAY 54 JE/RW 

1-'0 UNCLASSlf"IED REPLY OR REFERENCE IF' THE DATE TIME GROUP IS QUOTE!)o 

Pi\HAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED. CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE OECLASSI tY I N13 ... 

SECRET 

Declassified and approved fo1· release by NSA on 11-13-2013 

:i1.nsuant to E.O. 13526 

COPY4or 14 COPi .·