alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.13
SUPERIOR CONSULTANT HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Amendment to Employment Agreement
The current EmploymentAgreement, as amended, between RICHARD P. SASLOW, (“the employee”) and Superior Consultant Company, Inc., aMichigan Corporation, (“the company”), is hereby amended asfollows:
1. The section entitled “Salary” is deleted in its entirety andreplaced by the following:   “Salary” The bi-weekly salary will be $6394.2322 (prorated forpartial periods), subject to any payroll or other deductions asmay be required to be made pursuant to law, government order, orby written agreement with or consent of the employee. 2. This amendment is effective on 10/13/2002. There is nofixed or minimum term to this Amendment. Terms of the currentEmployment Agreement as previously amended, will prevail untilthe effective date of this Amendment. 3. Except as amended herein, all terms and provisions ofthe current Employment Agreement, as previously amended,remain in full force and effect.   Name SASLOW, RICHARDTitle Corporate VP & General Counsel
Accepted By SASLOW, RICHARD on 10/17/20024 10:34 PM
#### Graham and another vs. Chappell.

*Gcornislment: Stay or dismissal of proceedings.*

Even where garnishee proceedings may properly he *stayed,*they should not be *dismissed,*on the ground that a receiver of the property of the principal debtor had previously been appointed in another pending suit.

APPEAL from the Circnit Conrt for *Racine*County.

The facts in this case are the same as in the preceding case of *Graham, and another v. O' Neil,*except that Chappell, the garnishee in this case, appeared before the court commissioner, and his examination was duly certified and returned to the clerk of the circuit court; and thereafter the court made an order dismissing the proceedings in garnishment; 'from which the plaintiffs appealed.

The character of the defendant’s answer, and the effect claimed for it by his counsel, will sufficiently appear from the opinion.

*H. 8. Orton*and *N. 8.*Murphey, for appellants.

*Butler & Winhler,*for respondent.'

Cole, J.

Whatever relief the garnishee may ultimately be entitled to, it was premature to dismiss the proceedings at that stage of the cause. The garnishee had answered, and in this the case differs from that of the same parties against O’Neil [ante, p. 34], It is claimed, however, by the counsel for the respondent, that the answer of the garnishee shows that the indebtedness to the company, if any there were, existed prior to the appointment of the receiver, and that, therefore, it passed to the receiver by the terms of the order of appointment. And it is farther argued, that the filing of the creditor’s bill, and the issuing and ser*39vice of process in the case of *Howard v. The La Crosse and Milwaukee Railroad Company,*gave the complainant in that case a lien upon all the property and eifects of the judgment debtor; and that the garnishee, if liable to any one, is liable to the receiver in that action. And, inasmuch as that suit is still pending, and the receiver still in office, undischarged, it is said the garnishee proceeding should be arrested until that action is determined. But the proceeding was not only arrested, but dismissed entirely. In the case of *Prentiss v. Danaher,*20 Wis. 311, it was held that a garnishee defendant could not on the trial successfully defend by showing a prior-pending garnishee action against him for the same indebtedness, but might move at the outset, upon affidavits stating the facts, for a stay of proceedings until such prior action was terminated. Now, giving the above argument the most that can be claimed for it, it fails to sustain the order of dismissal. For even if the order appointing the receiver was broad enough to cover this indebtedness, if any exists,' at most that would only be a ground for staying the proceedings in this action until the Howard case is disposed of.

*By the Cotort.*— The order of dismissal is reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Exhibit 99.1


           CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                       ----------------------------------

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kushi Natural Foods Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Eugene Stricker, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

                  (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ DR. EUGENE STRICKER
------------------------------
Dr. Eugene Stricker
President
August 16, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from Form 10Q at
August 31, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1996
<CASH>                                         870,000
<SECURITIES>                                 1,986,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,869,000
<PP&E>                                          25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,869,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,840,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,029,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               117,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                201,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            201,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   201,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.08
                                              


</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20817

Conference Calendar

 

JAMES MOSLEY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KATTY ANTOINE,

Defendant-Appellee.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-02-CV-1416

--------------------

February 19, 2003

Before WIENER, EMILIO M. GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

James Mosley, Texas prisoner #1023626, appeals the dismissal

of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. In his complaint, he alleged that

Katty Antoine used racial slurs and epithets, in violation of his

right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. 

We decline to consider Mosley’s untimely argument that the

district court judge should have recused himself. See Clay

v. Allen, 242 F.3d 679, 681 (5th Cir. 2001); United States

v. Sanford, 157 F.3d 987, 988-89 (5th Cir. 1998).
No. 02-20817

-2-

Mosley’s claim that the district court erred in failing to

give him notice of the court’s intention to dismiss his complaint

and erred in failing to give him an opportunity to amend his

complaint is also without merit. Mosley has not alleged an

arguable constitutional claim nor has he asserted any further

facts that would have sustained an arguable claim. See Graves v.

Hampton, 1 F.3d 315, 319-20 (5th Cir. 1994). 

Finally, Mosley’s allegations of racial slurs and derogatory

epithets do not state a cognizable civil rights claim. Bender v.

Brumley, 1 F.3d 271, 274 n.4 (5th Cir. 1993). Mosley has alleged

only a de minimis physical injury, which is not sufficient to

sustain an Eighth Amendment claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e). 

Siglar v. Hightower, 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). 

Because Mosley’s appeal is without arguable merit and is

frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215,

219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this

appeal and the district court’s dismissal of Mosley’s complaint

both count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 

See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Mosley is CAUTIONED that if he accumulates another “strike” under

28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he will not be able to proceed in forma

pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is

incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under

imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(g). 

APPEAL DISMISSED; THREE-STRIKES WARNING ISSUED.
· MAIN susJE:ci: 

I1suanoe ot •IG~D ... ;....,.,. ' :..~' ~ 

... ""-f'r-"'·· ti•·--··-- . , ~~"'-- _,.,· 

~ .. ~ ,, 

To: Attaohe ltanglt~k . ' 

--· · From: AS-Q,_" ...... .-... ... -- -· 

BRIEF SUMMARY: . . , .. . .. , ....... ---- Reterenae 1• made to letter A-16-48, 20 Januar7 1948, subJect 

1 Isauanqe o! SIG!lOD'. 

-. 

Isauanot ot SIOROD to your o!!loe •111 not be made until the 

security det1o1eno1ea enumePated 1n the b1&1c oommun1oat1on are corrected 

and ASA 1a 10 not1t1e4, With refe~enoe io paragraph • ot basio co1111un1oat1on, the CSP 2200 

ia not 9r7ptographioall7 1dent1tal •1th the SIGROD and no praat1o~ble 

a.i-rangement oa.n be made which would pel"ID1t your uae ot the Department ot Stat~ equ1p~ent in ~~gko_k. .. . -~ . -

... 

! ·""' .. _,_,. . ' 

Classifier: ( __/ \':._. '. 

.. .. , 

IU.~e ife1-oe 

Ilia• lleeoe 

--

"-r• .... 

' ' 

... 

~-~-T~pist: 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

. -

~..:..=-=~~:-:-=--====-·- ,. ..• ,,,.~~~ .!~ ..... ;£~.,~., 

FILE: llepart~e~t , State 

·. 

.-. 1. ";"' 

-·· 

, ~ ~ate of Classifying: 8 -~~!,0}1._~ = 

•• 4- .. ~ , • 

- • ........... - • ""'-,1.,.,,a,...,-,. __ 

•.. .. - ..,.·,.. .. 

: ..• . .... ... -"'" : . . ,.... ... ... ,
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                   (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, Michael
G. Long, Chief Financial Officer of Edge Petroleum Corporation, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

          (1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                  /s/ MICHAEL G. LONG
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Michael G. Long
                                          Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

Dated: March 19, 2004
# C_2014362EN.01000501.xml

| 14.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 362/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 362/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 October 2014

2014/C 362/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2679 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 135,95 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4439 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78800 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1103 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2077 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2295 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,545 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,51 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1916 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4008 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8822 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4480 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4216 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8371 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6107 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6115 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 352,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0093 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7684 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6515 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 460,12 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1356 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,741 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 51,3027 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,113 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0303 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0317 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,3356 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2679

JPY

Japanese yen

135,95

DKK

Danish krone

7,4439

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78800

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1103

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2077

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2295

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,545

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,51

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1916

RON

Romanian leu

4,4008

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8822

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4480

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4216

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8371

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6107

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6115

KRW

South Korean won

1 352,15

ZAR

South African rand

14,0093

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7684

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6515

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 460,12

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1356

PHP

Philippine peso

56,741

RUB

Russian rouble

51,3027

THB

Thai baht

41,113

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0303

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0317

INR

Indian rupee

77,3356

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

385 

CA 10-01142 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, GREEN, AND GORSKI, JJ. 

 

DEWEY R. BARROW AND LISA M. BARROW, 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

D.L. GORDON DUBOIS AND PAUL D. DUBOIS, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

HORIGAN, HORIGAN & LOMBARDO, P.C., AMSTERDAM (JAMES A. LOMBARDO OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

CALLI, CALLI & CULLY, UTICA (HERBERT J. CULLY OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Anthony

F. Shaheen, J.), entered March 11, 2010 in a personal injury action. 

The order denied the motion of defendants to set aside the jury

verdict pursuant to CPLR 4404 (a). 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs (see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens,

155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1]). 

Entered: March 25, 2011 Patricia L. Morgan

Clerk of the Court
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000840 23-MAY-2014 08:29 AM
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06649]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health: Notice of Charter 
Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the Interagency Committee on Smoking 
and Health, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed 
for a 2-year period through March 20, 2017.
    For information, contact Simon McNabb, Designated Federal Officer, 
Interagency Committee on Smoking and Health, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention, Department of Health and Human Services, 
Patriot's Plaza, 395 E Street SW., M/S P06, Washington, DC 20201, 
telephone 202/245-0550 or fax 202/245-0599, Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dd9f9291ec9dbeb9bef3bab2ab"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="de9c9192ef9ebdbabdf0b9b1a8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-06649 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2015257EN.01000701.xml

| 6.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 257/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 257/7

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 257/05)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

To celebrate thirty years of the EU flag, euro-area Finance Ministers decided that euro-area Member States would strike a 2-euro commemorative coin using a common design on the national side. Euro-area citizens and residents have selected by public web-voting the winning design. Voters had a choice of five designs, which had been pre-selected by a professional jury following a design competition among European Mints, and they choose the design created by Mr Georgios Stamatopoulos, professional designer at the Bank of Greece.

Issuing country
  : The Netherlands

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : The 30th anniversary of the EU flag

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The designs shows the EU flag as a symbol that unites people and cultures with shared visions and ideals for a better common future. Twelve stars that morph into human figures are embracing the birth of a new Europe. At the top is the issuing country ‘NEDERLAND’. At the right are the years ‘1985-2015’. In between the flag and the years is the mint master mark and the mint mark. At the bottom right are the initials of the artist (Georgios Stamatopoulos).

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : October 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
# CA2014098EN.01000901.xml

| 3.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 98/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 98/9

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 098 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from Form 10Q at
August 31, 1997 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-31-1997
<CASH>                                         47,000
<SECURITIES>                                   3,051,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  50,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               20,000
<PP&E>                                         25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                 23,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,168,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,832,000
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          25,000
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,168,000
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               96,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             15,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (139,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (139,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (139,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.06)
        


</TABLE>