alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Consolidated Capital Institutional Properties;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of ConCap Equities, Inc., equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
TONI A. BOLLINGER

, Appellant,

v.

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE APPEALS COMMISSION AND U.S. POSTAL SERVICE

, Appellee s

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 5007

_____________________________/

Opinion filed April 6, 2017.

An appeal from an order from the Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

. Frank E. Brown

, Chairman

. Toni A. Bollinger, pro se

, Appellant.

Norman A. Blessing, General Counsel, Cristina A. Velez, Appellate Counsel, Tallahassee , for Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

.

PER C URIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS

, C.J., LEWIS

, and WINSOR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
# C_2015220EN.01001201.xml

| 4.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/12

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 220/03)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuance of euro coins are authorised to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, one of these being that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : Belgium

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 2015 – European Year for Development

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The inner part of the coin depicts a hand holding a globe of the Earth with a plant in the foreground. The inscription ‘2015 EUROPEAN YEAR FOR DEVELOPMENT’ features in an arc above the globe. The country code ‘BE’ appears beneath the hand while the signature mark of the Master of the Mint and the mark of the Brussels mint, a helmeted profile of the archangel Michael, are to its left.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : September 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,821-01

EX PARTE LARRY DONNELL GIBBS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2015CRR001320-D1(A) IN THE 49TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WEBB COUNTY

Per curiam. ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two counts of

robbery and sentenced to forty-seven years’ imprisonment on each count. 

Applicant contends, among other things, that trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466

U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999); Ex parte Axel,

757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As

we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the
2

appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to

Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07,

§ 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant

was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because trial counsel failed to file a notice of appeal. 

The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems

relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: November 23, 2016

Do not publish
#### The State of Ohio, Appellee, *v.*Davis, Appellant.

[Cite as *State v. Davis*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 212.]

(No. 99-252

Submitted June 22, 1999

Decided August 25, 1999.)

*213
      *John F. Holcomb,*Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Daniel G. Eichel,*First Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*John S. Marshall; David H. Bodiker,*Ohio Public Defender, and *Lori Leon,*Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

*Per Curiam.*

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. “Under App.R. 26(B)(2)(b), an application for reopening requires ‘a showing of good cause for untimely filing if the application is filed more than ninety days after journaliza*214tion of the appellate judgment.’ ” *State v. Wickline*(1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 369, 371, 658 N.E.2d 1052, 1053.

However, as the court of appeals noted, “[njeither the [Sjupreme [Cjourt’s decision in *State v. Murnahan,** * * nor App.R. 26(B) [was] available to allow” the filing of such applications for reopening at the time of the court of appeals decisions on May 27,1986 and October 29,1990.

Nonetheless, as we have held earlier, “an applicant who seeks to reopen an appellate judgment journalized before July 1, 1993 may not simply rely on the fact that App.R. 26(B) did not exist within the ninety days following journalization of the appellate judgment, but must show good cause why he or she did not attempt to invoke the procedures available under former App.R. 26 and 14(B).” *State v. Reddick*(1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 88, 90, 647 N.E.2d 784, 786.

In this case, Davis filed his applications to reopen his appeal in August 1998, five years after App.R. 26(B) became effective on July 1, 1993, six years after we decided *Mumahan,*almost eight years after the second court of appeals decision affirming his death sentence, and twelve years after the court of appeals first affirmed his death sentence. Thus, no question exists that the applications were untimely.

We agree with the court of appeals that Davis has failed to establish good cause for failing to file timely applications under App.R. 26(B) and *Murnahan.*Admittedly, counsel cannot be expected to argue their own ineffectiveness. *State v. Lentz*(1994), 70 Ohio St.3d 527, 529-530, 639 N.E.2d 784, 785. However, Davis has gone through several different sets of appellate lawyers since his initial appeal in 1986. Moreover, Lori Leon has represented him since at least March 1997, and Davis has not explained his failure to file between March 1997 and August 1998. Even if we were to find good cause for earlier failures to file, any such good cause “has long since evaporated. Good cause can excuse the lack of a filing only while it exists, not for an indefinite period.” *State v. Fox*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 514, 516, 700 N.E.2d 1253, 1254. See, also, *State v. Hill*(1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 174, 677 N.E.2d 337.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


In connection with the Annual Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the "registrant")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), I, Bruce J. Haber,
Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
my knowledge:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.


March 30, 2006


/s/ Bruce J. Haber
    ---------------
    Bruce J. Haber
    Chief Executive Officer
# C_2014342EN.01000102.xml

| 1.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 342/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 342/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7299 — COFCO/Nidera)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 342/02

On 25 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7299. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7299. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2385 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2385

 To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the corn ethanol mandate for 
                            renewable fuel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 20, 2021

Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mr. Toomey, Mr. Menendez, and Ms. Collins) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
               Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Clean Air Act to eliminate the corn ethanol mandate for 
                            renewable fuel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Corn Ethanol Mandate Elimination Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF CORN ETHANOL MANDATE FOR RENEWABLE FUEL.

    (a) Removal of Table.--Section 211(o)(2)(B)(i) of the Clean Air Act 
(42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(2)(B)(i)) is amended by striking subclause (I).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--Section 211(o)(2)(B) of the Clean Air 
Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)(2)(B)) is amended--
            (1) in clause (i)--
                    (A) by redesignating subclauses (II) through (IV) 
                as subclauses (I) through (III), respectively;
                    (B) in subclause (I) (as so redesignated), by 
                striking ``of the volume of renewable fuel required 
                under subclause (I),''; and
                    (C) in subclauses (II) and (III) (as so 
                redesignated), by striking ``subclause (II)'' each 
                place it appears and inserting ``subclause (I)''; and
            (2) in clause (v), by striking ``clause (i)(IV)'' and 
        inserting ``clause (i)(III)''.
    (c) Administration.--Nothing in this section or the amendments made 
by this section affects the volumes of advanced biofuel, cellulosic 
biofuel, or biomass-based diesel that are required under section 211(o) 
of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(o)).
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           9,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,462
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          179,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,815,841
<OTHER-SE>                                  29,986,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,353
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 36,125
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,125
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,125
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 
     We  consent  to the  incorporation by  reference of  (i) our  reports dated
February 11, 1997, with  respect to the  (a) consolidated financial  statements,
schedules  and supplementary information of Time Warner Inc. ('Time Warner') and
(b) consolidated financial statements and schedule of Time Warner  Entertainment
Company,  L.P. ('TWE') included in this Annual  Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 1996, and (ii) our  report dated March 3, 1995, with  respect
to  the combined  financial statements of  the Time  Warner Service Partnerships
included in TWE's Annual  Report on Form  10-K for the  year ended December  31,
1994, in each of the following:
 
          1. Registration Statement No. 333-11471 on Form S-4;
 
          2.  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  1  to  Registration  Statement No.
     333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8;
 
          3. Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  2  to  Registration  Statement  No.
     333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8;
 
          4.  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  3  to  Registration  Statement No.
     333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8;
 
          5. Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  4  to  Registration  Statement  No.
     333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8;
 
          6.  Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  5  to  Registration  Statement No.
     333-11471 on Form S-4 filed on Form S-8;
 
          7. Post-Effective  Amendment  No.  1  to  Registration  Statement  No.
     333-14053 on Form S-8;
 
          8. Registration Statement No. 333-14611 on Form S-3;
 
          9.  Registration Statement No. 333-17171 on Form S-3 (and Registration
     Statement No. 333-17171-01 of Time Warner  Companies, Inc. as to which  the
     prospectus   also  relates  to  post-effective  amendment  to  Registration
     Statement No. 33-50237 of Time Warner Companies, Inc.);
 
          10. Registration Statement  No. 33-61497  on Form S-8  of Time  Warner
     Companies, Inc.
 
                                          ERNST & YOUNG LLP
 
New York, New York
March 21, 1997

<PAGE>
<PAGE>



EXHIBIT 4(G)


                  AMENDMENT TO 1981 NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION PLAN
              (Adopted by the Board of Directors as of November 6, 1995)


Section 7.4 of the 1981 Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan of Pico Products, Inc.,
a New York corporation, is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows
(with brackets indicating deletions and double-underlining indicating
additions):

    7.4 Option Period.  Each Option granted under the Plan shall expire no
    later than (five) ten years from the date the Option is granted.  Option  
                      ---
                      ---
    Agreements for Key Employees shall contain provisions for the earlier
    expiration of the Options in the event of the Key Employee's termination of
    employment as provideed by Section 7.9.  Option Agreements for Key
    Contractors shall contain such provisions for the earlier expiration of the
    Options as the Board or Committee deems appropriate.  The Committee shall
                                                          -------------------
                                                          -------------------
    have the right, in its discretion, to modify any existing Option Agreement
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------
    by extending the expiration date of an Option to a date no later than ten
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    years from the date of grant of such Option.
    --------------------------------------------
    --------------------------------------------


                                      18