alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 01, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 01, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0122. LAURIE LEPLEY v. FULTON COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2015CV264821
DOUGLAS TARON EDWARDS,

Petitioner,

v.

JULIE L. JONES, SECRETARY, 

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS, et al.,

Respondents.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-0913

Opinion filed November 7, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Certiorari -- Original Jurisdiction.

Douglas Taron Edwards, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, and Beverly Brewster, Assistant General Counsel, 

Tallahassee, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

ROWE, MAKAR, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
**COREL CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES (DIRECT AND INDIRECT)**

**As of November 30, 2002**

**NAME
JURISDICTION**

Corel UK Limited                                   UK

Corel SARL                               France

Corel GmbH                               Germany

Corel K.K.                               Japan

Corel Pty Ltd                                 Australia

Corel Inc.                                    Delaware

Micrografx Italia S.r.L.                           Italy

Micrografx Technology N.V.                              Netherlands
Antilles

Micrografx B.V.                               Netherlands

Micrografx (Europe) AG                             Switzerland

InterCAP Graphics Systems GmbH                     Germany

Corel International Corp.                          Barbados

Corel do Brasil Ltda.                                   Brazil

36912 Limited                                 UK

Corel International (France) SARL                       France

Corel International (Germany) GmbH                      Germany

Corel Corporation Limited                          Ireland

3721035 Canada Inc.                           Canada

4094506 Canada Inc.                           Canada

4094492 Canada Inc.                           Canada

4094417 Canada Inc.                           Canada

Carleton Acquisition Co.                           Delaware

SoftQuad Software California, Inc.                      California

SoftQuad Limited                                   UK

NOTES:

1. Indented names are subsidiaries of the entity listed immediately above such subsidiary.
2. Inclusion in this exhibit is not a representation that the subsidiary is a
significant subsidiary.  Some subsidiaries may be inactive
or in process of being liquidated.
3. The majority of voting shares of all subsidiaries are owned by Corel Corporation,
its subsidiaries or employee nominees.
- -

A!iSA•OOD/ jow 

lrt!.UlOHAlil>UI.I J.t'OU A l&\-02 

SUilJ.s.:.Oi11 izioposed ob.anues to JCS 2010 

le In llrlay 1949• ADl.Z Stono,, ADLi1 ~is, CDR Boeder, and 

I prepared a memorandum .t\lr tba ~aOl'etary of tlle liavy stro~y 

oppos1no JCS 2010 and ~1vlnt; our roaaonao Attaohe4 to thia 

memo was a proposed redraft of 2010 for submlealon to the Vial' 

CouncU (\1il1ch was to oona1doza the matter on 18 Liay 1949) 1n 

the event that the Navr•a position \"JBS oven1deno \11th l'OgaN 

to 1ntGl'oept for AFSA• tb.e proposed revision contains the 

.tollowi:nu reoorruuended ohaftGea& 

"Paracraph a do (2) • Obanue to read aa 1nd1catedt 

" ( 2) ~ .&M•••BP' Installntions as reiu1red 

.!!J: AFSA and authorized b7-the J'o1nt Cb.lefa o 0"Sia'i'.t 

nll tie p;Dvlded b7 the Army, llBVJ't and Air Pbroeo 

Such 1natallat1ona will be manned and adm1n1ate1"8d 

b7 the aen1ce prov1d1rJB them, but will be opena t1onall7 d1zaeoted bJ' AFSAo" 

In add1t1o~ to th1a aba~e, we reaommended atr1k1ng out the 

'll0r4a "mobile 1nte~oept" i'l'om the paras~aph having to do w11;h 

tntercsept tac111t1es .tor the sen1oe1• which .tallows the 

above 1n JCS 2010. 

2. ~· eatabllsbment or AESA was approved by tho WU' 

Oouno1l but no action •as talten with iseaara to oU!' proposed nY1a1oao 

.&o aubaequen'bl.7" ADI4 Stone• in a lor:ta oon.t'aeaoe w1i;h 

Gone i.1oliarnca1 endoavowd to por8\Jade hi1.;1 to ca.le• the reaoaamend.e4 obanG••• lia aooepte4 aavel'&l vor7 r.d.no~ mod11"1oa~1ona 

whicb did not alte~ th• aenae or the di»ective, but 2'8.tuae4 

to make any other ol11U1U880 liav1ns .ta~ed at the two bJ.sbeafl 

m111t;o.ry lenla (1o••• War CouncU. and SOoDG.t) to 15et the 

dlreot1ve obanaed• DIRAFSA ancl I haw .te1t that the on17 

alternative 1a now to .tbllow the pi-es0%'1bed prooedurG of 

aubm1tt1na tho matter to Jes via AFSAC, whloh la ou.nentl7 

'belna doneo 

3 .If o l'r.&NGER 

APSA•OOB 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit 32.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS 

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-

Q

 for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hemanshu Pandya, 

President

 and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as 

adopted pursuant to

 § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and re

sults

 of operations of the Company.   Date: August 12, 2009   /s/ Hemanshu PandyaHemanshu PandyaPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000266 31-OCT-2019 07:48 AM
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0134. JAYDREKUS CARTEZ HART v. THE STATE.

On June 17, 2016, the trial court entered orders denying Jaydrekus Cartez

Hart’s motions for a sentence reduction and for his consecutive sentences to be

declared concurrent. On September 7, 2016, Hart filed a “Notice of Appeal” and an

“application for a Certificate of Probable Cause” in the Supreme Court, which

construed Hart’s filings collectively as an application for discretionary review and

transferred the case to us. We, however, lack jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d); Hill v. State, 204 Ga. App. 582 (420

SE2d 393) (1992). We are unable to consider an untimely application. See Hill, supra. 

Here, Hart filed his application 82 days after the trial court’s orders were entered. 

Accordingly, the application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/07/2016

November 07, 2016
... c 

0 

p 

y i 

' 

REF ID:A5220~ 

CONf\DENT\ftl 

OCSig0-311.5-(M-134) eve/gab April 12, 1133. 

lassifie an 

Converter, type M-134· 

Officer in Charge, Signal Corps Laboratories, 

Fort Monmouth, N. J. 

1. There is attached a copy of the military characteristics 

for a cipher macnine for use in Message Centers of Di visions and 

Higher Headquarters, which your Laboratory is now working on. 

2. These characteristics have not been submitted to the 

Signal Corps Technical Committee, inasmuch as it is for sole use 

by the Signal Corps, and in view of the fact that the project is 

considered as confidential. However, these projects have been 

approved by this office and should govern you in the development. 

By order of the Chief Signal Officer~ 

Incl. 

characteristics. 

ve for lea 

HUGH MIT CHhl.I., ' 

Major, Signal Corps. 

.. 

CONrlDENllAL 

SA n 1- 9-2013 rs ntt .. 3 
tn re applleAtion of 

Willian F. l'rlednan• et al 

11le4 JaJS\1111'1 23. 1932, 

Ser. No. e88t3" 

OryptOIP"APhio f.:7s,_ 

Hon .. Oomd1etonar ot J>aten·b, 

Slrt 

REF ID:A522o4B 

RellJ)Olltl 'ftl to Paffn.' Otttce J.G\ion dated April 9, 1932. 

17 19Parate oo.aunloattoa 'be Otf~l&l DrattltlMA ha• 'beea 

reque•••4 \o appl)' the reterenG• maaeral 1 'o Pia. 1 ot 'the Drawing 

--JZ--

- • which eonais'e - -

• 

- - whioh oon•t•\• - -

n EM A R Jr 8 

alalm 33. Reterrtng \o RoTlan4 cited at::alnet thelMt elai••• &tten\lon 11 

Ct>nfidential 
REF ID:A5220"9B 

electriod oondUton r&J)resenting a obarao"r 1• OO!l!l.'Jlo•cl ot 'he 

ot a elilf::-l• circuit, part or whioh tre.wr•• a aondue,ol" in a oipber 

wh••l• Thie cipher wheel i• not of the na\ure ot a oo.mautaior \mil' 

ot Ho'fland'1 411elo1we. 

Referring now to M!Mt'\hod ClAin• 4.0 1o 50 inoludw, it la 

• 

411 

M'bod olnlt:•u!l 1 ltu\ '\he reo1 \Al <Jf e\ruo'1ire 18 requir»:4 to -.lee tile ola.111# ., 

naa,y be predionte4 upon R rooUr•l ot etru.n",r• in '\he premnbl•• 11uttio1ent 

-1-
) 

L REF ID:A5220f.B 

1aYOr.!\"bl• reoona1der'lt1on ot olaiu 40 ~o &O 19 oour'hOU917 

--1-

J.H. 'fan4el'Wf.l"ke1' ut.4 

Oharl•a A. Ron 

A'torMJ••
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          16,518
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,205
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,833
<PP&E>                                       5,689,401
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,281,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,344,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          129,369
<BONDS>                                      4,030,435
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,185,115
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,344,919
<SALES>                                        744,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               744,330
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  404,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               236,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             263,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (195,846)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (149,826)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (46,020)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (195,846)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (6.61)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (6.61)


</TABLE>
REF ID:A65438 

- __ ,......_G ...... - • I • I I -. I I • ' I 

I ; I~ 

FROM MAJOR PERDUE (TWX to I&L from SB) 

IM 226 

SUBJECT TRANSMISSION OF MATERIAL RECEIVED FROM NAVY 

1. We have received the following intorma.tion from Navy cln 

SHANGHAI NR 2 WEATHER UNIT ORIGINATED A LONG FOUR-PART 

STANDARD REPORT AT 1313, 8 JUNE, A'ND A LONG TWO-PARTER AT 1523 1 11 . JUNE, TO USUAL ADDRESSEES. · IN THE PAST, THE SUBJECT MATTER OF THESE 

REPORTS HAS BEEN JAPANESE SOLUTIONS OF 'WEATHER CODES USED :5Y U .s .. AIR 

FORCES IN CHINA, GIVING METHOD FOR DECRIPTION, CODE RECOVERIES, ETC. THESE ARE 'l'HE FIRST REPORTS NOTED FROM NR 2 'WEATHER UNIT SINCE 

26 MAY AND THE LENGTH SUGGESTS THAT THE JAPS HAVE AGAIN BEEN SUCCESSFUL 

IN BREAKING 'WEATHER CODES USED BY U.S. AIR FORCES IN CHINA. 

2. THE ABOVE MAY BE OF INTEREST TO LT COL KULLBACK AND T-0 YOUR 

CODE SECURITY SECTION. 

• .. --""I 

I 1, 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

\
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE TWO FISCAL QUARTERS ENDED JULY 10, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-10-1999
<CASH>                                           3,585
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  426,361
<ALLOWANCES>                                    26,193
<INVENTORY>                                    852,486
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,430,435
<PP&E>                                       1,652,512
<DEPRECIATION>                                 779,597
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,367,170
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,190,793
<BONDS>                                      1,139,439
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,092
<OTHER-SE>                                     449,862
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,367,170
<SALES>                                      7,814,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,814,608
<CGS>                                        7,059,022
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,742,533
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                12,981
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              90,253
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (31,159)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,580)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (26,579)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (26,579)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.70)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.70)


</TABLE>
#### The State vs. Werner.

*April 26*

May *10, 1881.*

EEPOETED from the Circuit Court for *Jaelison*County.

This cause was argued with *The State v.*Haas.

Pee Curiam.

The questions submitted for our decision in this case have been answered in the case of *State v.*Haas, and require no further comment.

The cause will be remitted to the circuit court for further proceedings, with our decision upon the questions in that case.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2273 

To authorize Inspectors General to continue operations during a lapse in 

appropriations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. CARPER) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To authorize Inspectors General to continue operations 

during a lapse in appropriations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep the Watchdogs 

5 Running Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OVERSIGHT DURING LAPSE 

7 IN APPROPRIATIONS. 

8 Section 6(g) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 

9 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end the fol10 lowing: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2273 IS

1 ‘‘(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of law and 

2 in addition to any other authority, during a lapse in appro3 priations, an Inspector General may incur obligations in 

4 advance of appropriations— 

5 ‘‘(A) for such amounts as may be necessary and 

6 at a rate for operations and under the authority and 

7 conditions as provided in the most recently enacted 

8 appropriations Acts; and 

9 ‘‘(B) to perform the duties of the Office with 

10 respect to any program and operation of the estab11 lishment that continues during the lapse in appro12 priations.’’. 

Æ 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 97-50250

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

REGINALD DWAYNE ELLISON, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. A-96-CR-125-1

- - - - - - - - - -

March 20, 1998

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendant-appellant Reginald Dwayne Ellison appeals his

convictions for aiding and abetting the possession of cocaine

base with intent to distribute and conspiring to possess cocaine

base with intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. 

§§ 841(a)(1) and 846. Ellison has not demonstrated that the

district court committed plain error in admitting into evidence

information about his previous convictions and arrests, or that
No. 97-50250

-2-

the court engaged in judicial misconduct in connection with the

admission of this evidence. See United States v. Calverley, 37

F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Gray, 105 F.3d

956, 964 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1856 (1997); United

States v. Bermea, 30 F.3d 1539, 1569 (5th Cir. 1995); United

States v. Moser, 123 F.3d 813, 824 (5th Cir. 1997). Ellison has

also failed to show that the court engaged in misconduct with

regard to telling his trial attorney in open court to read a

requested limiting instruction to the jury. See Bermea, 30 F.3d

at 1569; cf. United States v. Candelaria-Gonzalez, 547 F.2d 291,

295-98 & n.8-11 (5th Cir. 1977). The limiting instruction given

to the jury with regard to its consideration of evidence of a

codefendant’s guilty plea was, in any event, adequate. See

United States v. Pierce, 959 F.2d 1297, 1304 (5th Cir. 1992).

 AFFIRMED.
Connecticut Department of 

ENERGY & 

ENVIRONMENTAL 

PROTECTIO N 

79 Elm Street • Hartford, CT 06106-5127 www.ct.gov/deep Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer 

January 25,2013 

David B. Conroy, Chief 

Air Programs Branch 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 1 

5 Post Office Square - Suite 100 

Mail Code OEP05-02 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Re: Negative Declaration for Hospital Medical Infectious Waste Incinerators - 40 CFR Part 60, 

Subpart Ce: Connecticut 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) hereby submits a negative 

declaration pursuant to the Emission Guidelines for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators 

Constructed on or Before June 20, 1996, 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ce. As of today, DEEP's information 

indicates that no Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerator (HMIWI) is operating in the State of 

Connecticut. 

Until recently, a single HMIWI unit did operate in the state, owned by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 

and located in Wallingford, Connecticut. That unit was recently shut down, and the permit was revoked, 

as follows: 

• The HMIWI unit has not been in operation since July 2012 and rendered inoperable on or around 

September 10, 2012. An inspection report (attached) issued by DEEP on September 28, 2012 

confirms that the Ecolaire Environmental Products 1000TES Incinerator has been rendered 

inoperable and that the source no longer operates a unit subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ce. 

• Permit Number 189-0207-TV for the premises at Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, 5 Research 

Parkway, Wallingford, CT has been revoked. The revocation notice, dated December 27, 2012, is 

If DEEP discovers an operating HMIWI unit in the state that is subject to 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ce or 

Ec, we will inform you and work to address any outstanding obligations. If you have any questions, 

please do not hesitate to get in touch with Richard A. Pirolli of my staff at (860) 424-3450. 

attached. 

Sincerely, 

Anne R. Gobin, Chief 

Bureau of Air Management 

cc: Patrick Bird, EPA Region 1 (via electronic mail)
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06399]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a 
Savings and Loan Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and the Board's Regulation LL (12 CFR 
part 238) to acquire shares of a savings and loan holding company. The 
factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in 
paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than April 6, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice 
President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:
    1. Jane Houston McCready, Winchester, Kentucky; Sarah McCready 
Boston, New York, New York; and Louise French McCready Hart, New York, 
New York, as individuals and in their capacities as co-trustees of 
Marital Trust B which was created under the Richard F. McCready 
Revocable Trust Agreement; to acquire voting shares of WinFirst 
Financial Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of 
Winchester Federal Bank, both in Winchester, Kentucky.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 17, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-06399 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P