alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID:A39418 

• • 

-u;..:: .,; ·p~"t 

~j~ 11 7ltomic . . . 

WARNING 

I An Editorial 

. in The Christian Science Monitor 

I The news presents two sharply contrasting approaches I · to the United States' defense problem. One is the testimony 

I of the retiring Air Force Chief of Staff, General Vanden· 

berg, that 143 wings are essentia •. The other is the report of 

I the KelJy committee, emphasizing the necessity for effective measures to defend the United States from surprise I atomic attack. 

I . The most crucial parts of the Vandenberg testiinony were 

given to a Senate committee in secret. They may shoW that 

:I the proposed $5 billion cut in Air For~e funds will weaken 

I

. the Air Force two-~ three years hence. But lveri under 

proposed cuts the nation's air power will be sharply in· I · creased this year and next. 

Meanwhile the Kelly report is a reminder that the whole I defe~e picture is cl1~nging and that the controversy over 

I 143 wings may be diverting attention ft;om more basic 

considerations. The committee of distingwshed civilians I headed by the presid~t of the Bell Telephone Labora· 

I tories warns that ·~he nation is already vulnerable to serious 

damage from atomie a.ttacJcs. 

I 

I 

Within four or five YeatS dariger is foreseert of a surprise 

blow_ that could criijple the supply bases and productive 

ca~city Ofi which_ 1111 military power depends. It would not 

I matter particulafly how m~y wings there might be in the 

Air Force if half of them could not be serviced. 

One feature of the Kelly re ort merits special attention 

-its plea for a. better t:arly war~ing system. Here again no 

I 

I 

I 

ii 

amount of planes will. suffice unless the deferuters are r 

alerted as to the time and place of attack. Indeed, wlwn 

:I the defense problem is viewed from· this angJ.e the number 

of wings becomes far less import~t than eyes. and ears to 

1

. guide, them. Thi~ ii an urgent consideration to which those 

on ·bOth sides of_ the pl~e ,controversy should give more I attention. :
# C_2014299EN.01000102.xml

| 5.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7132 — INEOS/Doeflex)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 299/02

On 30 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7132. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7132. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
J-A08034-16

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

JOHN VINCENZI

 Appellant

 v.

ROBERT M. MORGAN AND MORGAN 

COMPANY AND SELECTIVE INSURANCE

 Appellees

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 

 No. 2108 EDA 2015

Appeal from the Order Entered June 11, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County

Civil Division at No(s): C-0048-CV-2013-11855

BEFORE: BOWES, OLSON and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

DISSENTING STATEMENT BY STRASSBURGER, J.:

FILED NOVEMBER 18,2016

I respectfully dissent. Because I conclude that genuine issues of 

material fact exist as to whether Mr. Vincenzi was in the zone of danger and 

whether he feared physical impact, I would reverse and remand for trial on 

his claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 22, 2016

No. 04-16-00560-CV

Louis V. DOSS, Individually, and as Surviving Spouse of Carolyn S. Doss,

Appellant

v.

Deborah ROBINSON,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-320-B

Honorable Stephen B. Ables, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant filed a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by rule 26.1 of the Texas 

Rules of Appellate Procedure, but within the fifteen-day grace period provided by rule 26.3 for 

filing a motion for extension of time. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, 26.3. On October 24, 2016, we 

ordered appellant to provide a reasonable explanation for filing a late notice of appeal or to 

otherwise show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed. See Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 

S.W.2d 615 (1997). Appellant filed a response adequately showing that the failure to timely file 

the notice of appeal was not deliberate or intentional. We therefore retain this appeal on the 

docket of the court. 

The record has been filed. We order appellant’s brief due December 22, 2016. 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
-~54-

SECRET 

FM: SUSLO LONDON 

TO: DI RNSA 

DTG; 281833z APRIL 54 

MSG NR: LW 283 

PL86_:36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3. 3 (h){2J 

ROUT! NE ~ 

6¢ 

S/ASST 

AGI# ¢5672 

ACT: · 10 

I P\JfO ~ 062 

22 ¢621 

V/DIR 

23/ C/s 

DCS 

P/P 

AG 

92 

9f!J 

H5 

1 

2 

~ 

~ 7-8 & 1~~i8 ~ & , ~21 

1¢-1 

~~ 

FURTHER MY LW 282~ JEC.HNl(Al INTELLIGENCE REPORT RE INTERROGATION 

OF SOV I£ T S 1 GNALS OFF I Cf.R ,\ CONTAINS EXCELLENT 

MANE LNERS WH IC H SHOULD 

BE OF REAL VALUE TO MilllARY T/A SECTION GRIGORIEV KNOWLEDGE OF 

fHOULD ALSO BE OF CONSIDERABLE &JSE TO L-~~~~~~~~~~~~-

NSA. 

NSA 115 NOT(: LW 282 IS AGI# ¢5671 

DATE Rf.CD~ 282117z APRIL 54 BL/ARJ COPY '/S 

PAGE 1 

__,=-::-_COP I ES 

PAGES 

NO ~NCLASSIFIED REPLY OR REFERENCE Ir THE DATE TIME GROUP IS QUOTED 

PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-13-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
Cite as 2016 Ark. 407

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Opinion Delivered November 17, 2016

IN RE DISTRICT COURT 

RESOURCE ASSESSMENT BOARD

PER CURIAM

Honorable Michael Lincoln of Searcy, White County Judge, is reappointed to the 

District Court Resource Assessment Board for a term to expire on April 30, 2020. The 

court thanks Judge Lincoln for his continued service.

Mark Hayes, Esq., of North Little Rock, is appointed to the District Court Resource 

Assessment Board for a term to expire on April 30, 2020. The court thanks Mr. Hayes for 

his willingness to serve on this important board.

We recognize Mayor Chris Claybaker, whose term has expired, for his service to the 

board.
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT**

**TO      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of, and for, the periods presented in the                Report. |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                  |                                         |         |
|-------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------------|
|                                             |                                    |    |
| Date: May                15,                2006 | By:                                |         |
|                                                  | William                W. Priest             |
|                                                  | Chief                Executive Officer       |
|                                                  | (Principal Executive                Officer) |

|                                              |                                       |         |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|--------------|
|                                         |                                  |    |
| Date: May              15,              2006 | By:                              |         |
|                                              | Adam              Borak                    |
|                                              | Chief              Financial Officer       |
|                                              | (Principal Financial              Officer) |
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14406]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06337]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2015-0001; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1436


Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for Lee County, Illinois, 
and Incorporated Areas and Ogle County, Illinois, and Incorporated 
Areas

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Proposed notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing 
its proposed notices concerning proposed flood hazard determinations, 
which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood 
Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone 
designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as 
proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps 
and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports 
for Lee County, Illinois, and Incorporated Areas and Ogle County, 
Illinois, and Incorporated Areas.

DATES: These withdrawals are effective March 19, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
1436 to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal 
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management 
Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-4064, or 
(email) <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ace0d9c5df82fec3c8dec5cbd9c9d69feccac9c1cd82c8c4df82cbc3da"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2c6059455f027e43485e454b5949561f6c4a49414d0248445f024b435a">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering 
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, 
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 
20472, (202) 646-4064, or (email) <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c589b0acb6eb97aaa1b7aca2b0a0bff685a3a0a8a4eba1adb6eba2aab3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="723e071b015c201d16001b15071708413214171f135c161a015c151d04">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 3, 2014, FEMA published proposed 
notices at 79 FR 65231, proposing flood hazard determinations for Lee 
County, Illinois, and Incorporated Areas and Ogle County, Illinois, and 
Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing the proposed notices.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

    Dated: February 23, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland 
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-06337 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2014285EN.01000101.xml

| 27.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 285/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 285/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 August 2014

2014/C 285/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3192 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,15 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4547 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79605 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1563 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2086 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1460 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,841 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,16 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1828 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4000 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8615 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4157 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4465 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2243 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5830 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6474 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,15 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,0825 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1265 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6270 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 432,59 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1650 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,801 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,6840 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,114 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0136 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,2974 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,8327 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3192

JPY

Japanese yen

137,15

DKK

Danish krone

7,4547

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79605

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1563

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2086

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1460

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,841

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,16

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1828

RON

Romanian leu

4,4000

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8615

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4157

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4465

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2243

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5830

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6474

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,15

ZAR

South African rand

14,0825

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1265

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6270

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 432,59

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1650

PHP

Philippine peso

57,801

RUB

Russian rouble

47,6840

THB

Thai baht

42,114

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0136

MXN

Mexican peso

17,2974

INR

Indian rupee

79,8327

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014242EN.01000102.xml

| 25.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7293 — Allergopharma/Stallergenes/Laboratorios LETI/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 242/02

On 18 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7293. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7293. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel
M. Healy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Daniel M. HealyDaniel M. HealyExecutive Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 August 9, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to North Fork
Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by North Fork Bancorporation, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. 44
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 3199

_____________________________
P ATRICK L EE C ARSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Taylor County

. Gregory S. Parker , Judge

. March 25, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. R OBERTS , R AY , and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Patrick Lee Carson, pro se
, Appellant.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Tabitha Rae Herrera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
• .. REF ID:A65437 

I 

MAGIC--FAR EAST SUMMA.RY 

No. 252 

27 Nov 44 

~~,.~-..~-· 

I 

~. s. China Coast--Warninss of U. s. Air Attacks: 

!.• Formosa--Luzon ,L\rea: At 1340! on 26 Nov an 

unidentified.Japanese Navy originator warned convoys in 

the South China Sea that·"commun1cation intelligence" indicated that u. s. air forces based in China planned to attack Japanese ships in Luzon Strait on the 27th. 

b. Hainan: ,At 2250! on 26 Nov Japanese conI 

voys operatins off the S coast of Hains.n were alerted 

against air attacks. 

L

,'- : ' ' r ~ , ~ ~- I \ ,\ -·l- ~ . \~--::i - · ........ -- -~ . 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID: A65437. 

I - -

• ~J I 

MAGIC--FAR EAST SUMMARY 

No. 252 

I - , I 

t.'- - - 1-z_ ... _,,, "• ' ...... _,,, 

27 Nov 44 

5. Japanese Intelligence on u. s. Air Forces: L 

!.· On 2' Nov the Second Area Army (HQ Pi:tigrang, SW Celebes) sent the following staff message to Tokyo, the S~uthern Army, the Fourteenth Area Army and the Fourth Air 

Army: 

"According to 'A' Intelligence (as of 21 Nov): 

"(l) The main force of the 49th Fighter Group, which is under the 5th Fighter Command, is at 

Leyte. It has P-38 1 s and P-4o•s. 

11 (2) · The commander of the l;,th Bomber Command is at Sansapor /_NW New Guiney. The 42nd Bomber 

Group, the 13th Fighter Command and the 347th Fighter Group are also at Sansapor. The 3rd Attack Bomber 

Group is at Hollandia." 

Note: The term."A" Intelligence is generally·used by the Japanese to describe information derived from enooded 

Allied commun1cat.1ons. An "A" Intelligence message sent on 

(J 2970) 

10 A~g b1 the Second Area Army contained comparatively 1nacc\rate information on the identity and location of u. s. Fifth Air 

Force units (FES 30 Sept 44). The four Groups ment!oned in 

the present message, however, are actually at the locations 

given. 

b. Also on, 22 Nov the Fourteenth Area Army, which 

commands Japanese forces in the Philippines, sent the follo~-

1ng message to the Second Area Army: 

'~Tith ~eference to enemy plane movements in 

the Morotai sector, ~e have been using the current 

1A1 Intelligence of your Army as our only source of 

information. Since your 1A1 Intelligence 1s very (~ 2839) valuable data for us, in the future please make these 

reports currently. Also, in order to have a complete ~aap of .the ~ea~ situation we must rely on messages · .LPossihly sighting repo~t!l from the 32nd Div IJ!s.lmaher"!/ 

From now on please send such messages directly to us." 

.. ~!"":""'i,. '-='(.~ I I' I 11 . I • . 'I ' >t I I' I
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7097

KENNETH NEWKIRK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Roderick Charles Young, 

Magistrate Judge. (3:16-cv-00265-HEH-RCY)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth H. Newkirk, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Newkirk seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order 

directing Newkirk to pay the filing fee or explain why he cannot 

and denying a host of motions without prejudice. This court may 

exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 

(2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. 

Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Newkirk seeks 

to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory 

or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED