alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3617

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

John Trammell, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: August 3, 1999

Filed: August 13, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After John Trammell sold horses subject to a bank lien without the bank’s

permission, a jury convicted Trammell of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1344

(1994). On appeal, Trammell first contends the district court abused its discretion by

admitting evidence that Trammell sold some of these horses in Mississippi and then

pleaded guilty to state charges relating to that sale. Contrary to Trammell’s view, the

district court properly admitted this relevant evidence of the charged crime and the

evidence did not unfairly prejudice Trammell. See United States v. Wilson, 177 F.3d

712, 713-14 (8th Cir. 1999). 
-2-

Trammell also contends the district court should have granted his motion for

mistrial after the Government inadvertently referred to Trammell’s withdrawn guilty

plea to the federal charges while reading to the jury Trammell’s petition to accept his

guilty plea in the related Mississippi state court case. We disagree. Trammell

specifically requested his entire state court petition be read to the jury, Trammell

refused a cautionary instruction following the reference to his earlier guilty plea, and

any error was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of Trammell’s guilt.

See United States v. Martinez, 3 F.3d 1191, 1199 (8th Cir. 1993); United States v.

Sopczak, 742 F.2d 1119, 1122-23 (8th Cir. 1984) (per curiam).

We affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05706]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and 
Human Development; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel; Wellstone Centers for Muscular 
Dystrophy.
    Date: April 27-28, 2015.
    Time: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suite at the Chevy Chase Pavilion, Washington, DC 
20115.
    Contact Person: Cathy J. Wedeen, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National 
Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, 6100 Executive 
Boulevard, Room 5B01-G, Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, (301) 435-6878, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1760727372727974577a767e7b39797e7f39707861"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4d3a28292828232e0d202c242163232425632a223b">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.864, 
Population Research; 93.865, Research for Mothers and Children; 
93.929, Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research; 93.209, 
Contraception and Infertility Loan Repayment Program, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: March 9, 2015.
Michelle Trout,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-05706 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2014384EN.01000101.xml

| 30.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 384/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 384/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7418 — Bosch/ZF Lenksysteme)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 384/01

On 24 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in German language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7418. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7418. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-10-00280-CV

IN THE GUARDIANSHIP OF 

BUFORD SCOTT, JR.

------------

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HOOD COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered “Appellant's Amended Motion To Dismiss.” It is the 

court=s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the 

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution 

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J. 

DELIVERED: December 8, 2011

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GEORGE C. CHATMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-56794

D.C. No. 5:14-cv-01244-PA-MAN

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Percy Anderson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

George C. Chatman appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging that defendants violated his constitutional rights and

committed various torts against him by instructing him to file tax returns for the

years 2010, 2011, and 2012. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

FILED

NOV 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
affirm.

Chatman failed to address any of the district court’s grounds for dismissal,

and has therefore waived his appeal of the district court’s order. See Indep. Towers

of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not

consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”);

Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by

argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).

AFFIRMED.

2 14-56794
# CA2014441EN.01000201.xml

| 10.12.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 441/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 441/2

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

(2014/C 441 A/02)

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 293 | (NL) |
| 295 | (MT) |
| 297 | |
| 299 | |
| 304 | |
| 321 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 325 | (SL) |
| 332 | |
| 334 | |
| 340 | |
| 342 | (EN) |
| 352 | |
| 354 | |
| 358 | |
| 366 | |
| 376 | |
| 378 | (SV) |
| 381 | |
| 384 | |
| 385 | (PT) |
| 390 | (HR) |
| 391 | |
| 410 | |
| 412 | |
| 425 | (EN/IT/LT) |
| 427 | |
| 432 | |
| 433 | (DE) |
| 434 | |
| 441 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

293

(NL)

295

(MT)

297

299

304

321

(DE/EN/FR)

325

(SL)

332

334

340

342

(EN)

352

354

358

366

376

378

(SV)

381

384

385

(PT)

390

(HR)

391

410

412

425

(EN/IT/LT)

427

432

433

(DE)

434

441

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1,431
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     6,774
<ALLOWANCES>                                        674
<INVENTORY>                                       7,032
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 15,895
<PP&E>                                           20,202
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (10,713)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   31,803
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            23,592
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                             96
<OTHER-SE>                                            0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     31,803
<SALES>                                          23,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 24,120
<CGS>                                            13,086
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    12,273
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2,284
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (3,523)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      1,268
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (2,255)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2,255)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      (.24)



</TABLE>
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 29, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-13-00351-CR

TUAN TRUNG TA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 228th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1282590

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A written request to withdraw the notice of appeal in this case, personally signed by 

appellant, has been filed with this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. Because this Court has 

not delivered an opinion, we grant appellant's request.

Accordingly, we order the appeal dismissed. We direct the Clerk of the Court to issue 

the mandate of the Court immediately.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison and McCally.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
### ISSUED: November 16, 2016 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

## DEPARTMENT OF OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

## TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, DC 

## Zll. NOV 

## t1 A 3: l 0
In The Matter Of: ) 

## DOCKET OPERATiONS DocketNo. FAA-2014-1116 ) Pacific International Skydiving Center
. ., ) ) Respondent )

TO: Bryan Stanley 67-314 Kaliuna Street Waialua, HI 96791 SUBPOENACase No. 2014WP130012

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(3), YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED to appear and testify at a hearing scheduled to begin at the following place, date, and time: 

### 1. Location:

2. 

### Date: 3. 

### Time: United States District Court, District ofHawaii 300 AlaMoanaBlvd. Honolulu, HI 96850 December 13, 2016 9:00 a.m. local time This subpoena is issued because the Respondent, Pacific International Skydiving Center, filed an application onNovember 12, 2016 requesting your presence to testify atthis hearing. If you have any questions about the subpoena, you should contact the Respondent's counsel at the address and telephone number listed below. The provisions of 14 C.F.R. § 13.228(b) allow you to file a motion to quash ormodify this subpoenawiththe undersignedjudge. The applicant shall describe, in detail, the basis for the application to quash ormodify the subpoenaincluding, but not limited to, a statementthat the testimony is notrelevant to the proceeding orthat the subpoena is unreasonable and oppressive. A motion to quash ormodify the subpoena will stay the effect ofthe subpoenapending a decision by the undersignedjudge onthe motion. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.229, you are entitled to the same fees and mileage expenses as are

### paid to witnesses appearing inthe courts ofthe United States. These fees shall be paid by the Respondent, the party at whose request you have been subpoenaed. Ifyou fail orrefuse to comply with this subpoena, a party may, in accordance with 14 C.F.R § 13.228( c), apply to the local federal district court to seekjudicial enforcement ofthe subpoena.

Subpoena issued at the request of: Robert L. Feldman, 

### Respondent's Counsel 8900 SW 107th Avenue, Suite 203 Miami, FL 33176 TEL: 305-598-4841 FAX: 305-598-4842

DocketNo. FAA-2014-1116 DOUGLAS M. RA WALD Administrative Law Judge

Subpoena, page 2
## NUMBER 13 - 12 - 006 39 - CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JOHN EDWARD DIMAS , A ppellant ,
v. N OE IBARRA PUENTE , A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 3 70th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Jo hn Edward Dimas , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by
the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C

- 2649

- 12

- G . The parties have filed a joint motio n to dismiss appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement regarding the matters at issue in this appeal. The parties request2

that this Court dismiss this case with out prejudice to appellant’s right to contest the validity of the temporary injunctions in any contempt proceeding. The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss
with out prejudice, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed without prejudice to appellant’s right to contest the validity of the temporary injunctions in any contempt proceeding. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurri ng same. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). The parties request immediate issuance of our mandate. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P .18.1(c). The motion is GRANTED. We direct the Clerk o f the Court to issue the mandate immediately. PER CURIAM
Delivered and filed the 29th day of November , 201 2

.
# C_2015112EN.01000102.xml

| 2.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7539 — GIP II/ACS/DevCo)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 112/02)

On 27 March 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7539. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7539. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015102EN.01000401.xml

| 27.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 102/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 102/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 March 2015

(2015/C 102/04)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0973 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 130,67 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4678 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,73710 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3250 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0498 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,6005 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,376 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 299,65 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,0763 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4270 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8425 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3990 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3653 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,5090 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4429 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4987 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 212,14 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,0189 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,8174 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6498 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 14 304,58 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,0212 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 49,171 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 62,7707 |
| THB | Thai baht | 35,712 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4904 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,4244 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 68,8296 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0973

JPY

Japanese yen

130,67

DKK

Danish krone

7,4678

GBP

Pound sterling

0,73710

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3250

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0498

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,6005

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,376

HUF

Hungarian forint

299,65

PLN

Polish zloty

4,0763

RON

Romanian leu

4,4270

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8425

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3990

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3653

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,5090

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4429

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4987

KRW

South Korean won

1 212,14

ZAR

South African rand

13,0189

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,8174

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6498

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

14 304,58

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,0212

PHP

Philippine peso

49,171

RUB

Russian rouble

62,7707

THB

Thai baht

35,712

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4904

MXN

Mexican peso

16,4244

INR

Indian rupee

68,8296

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
First Union National Bank
of North Carolina

Master Servicing Division
301 South College Street, TW9
Charlotte, North Carolina 28288-0828
704 374-2487
Fax 704 383-0387
Toll Free 800 786-9819


(logo)FIRST UNION

                             OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE



Reference  is hereby made to that certain Sale and  Servicing  Rights  Agreement
dated as of September 1, 1991 between Diawa Finance Corp.  (the  "Company")  and
Fleet  Real  Estate  Funding  Corp.   ("Fleet")  with  respect  to  Coventional,
FHA-Insured and VA-Guaranteed  Residential  Mortgage Loans,  Group No. 1991-HZ-1
(the  "Agreement").  Capitalized  terms used herein not otherwise  defined shall
have the meanings  assigned in the Agreement.  First Union Mortgage  Corporation
assumed the  obligations of the Company by assignment from Fleet pursuant to the
Assignment and Assumption  dated December 1, 1994 by and between Fleet and First
Union Mortgage Corporation.



Pursuant  to  Section  6.04 of the  Agreement,  I,  Anthony J.  Gagliardo,  Vice
President of First Union Mortgage Corporation, do hereby certify that:



     1. The Company has fully  complied with the provisions of Article IV of the
     Agreement during the period from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996;

     2. A review of the activities of the Company during the period from January
     1, 1996 through  December 31, 1996 and of the Company's  performance  under
     the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision; and

     3. To the best of my  knowledge,  based on such  review,  the  Company  has
     fulfilled all its  obligations  under the Agreement  throughout  the period
     from January 1, 1996 through December 31, 1996.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,  the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the lst
day of April, 1997.

                            /s/Anthony J. Gagliardo
                           Anthony J. Gagliardo, Vice
                                   President
 
LIG\190991
Inv 730-001