alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John A.
Witham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                                     /s/ John A. Witham
                                     __________________________________
                                     John A. Witham
                                     Executive Vice President and
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     April 9, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 13, 2019

No. 04-18-00610-CV

Michael P. GEARY, Independent Executor of the Estate of Joseph William Geary, Jr., Deceased 

and Falcon Energy, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

TOW BOW RANCH LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Two Bow Management, LC and Ronald L. 

Toms, Individually,

Appellees

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-03609

Honorable David A. Canales, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The Appellees’ Motion to Extend Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. Time is 

extended to June 5, 2019. No further extensions of time to file appellees’ brief will be 

allowed.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of May, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
t 

I 

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Advanced Systems Technology 

Management Inc. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Under Contract No. NOOl 78-05-D-4165 et al.) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 61441 

Stephen J. McBrady, Esq. 

Skye Mathieson, Esq. 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

Washington, DC 

Arthur M. Taylor, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Samuel W. Morris, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: August 1, 2019 

RICHARD SHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61441, Appeal of Advanced Systems 

Technology Management Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 23, 2016

p1122

Order 

Clerk

November 23, 2016

153207

JP MORGAN CHASE NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153207

COA: 322718

Macomb CC: 2013-002063-CH

MICHAEL R. TEANY a/k/a MICHAEL

TEANY,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the stipulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to 

the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for 

leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
\ 

\ 

\ 

\ 

( .. 

·.!· 

WAR QEPARTMENT, 

OFFICE OF.THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WAS!'llNGTON · 

Decemb~r· 29th, 19~9. I 

\ 

' 

.,, 

[·1 was has:til'y summone·d to n.y not~er's bedside about n w~ek a~o because of ,her desp~rate illness and, therefore, did not receive, until 

my return on Saturday,. i..he little tnpe message which you had orepared, 

1•·'-i ch demonstrated beyond a shadow of a. doubt, thnt yo'\.l had ·n0t on}y broken ~he one hundred fifty messa~es nreparea·on the orinting telegraph according to the method used 1a.st year by the Signal G-:r pa, bu:t; that you 

had :J.lSO re,cons':,ructed tp0 running k~y: \'ThiclT enabled you to t:m~pare mesS)l<!:eS to ·be ~ent to the Chief Signal Off~cer, to General Churc~ill and to 

myself', ::i 11 of vr!;i ch '.•ere this morning., nut through without mishap, on t'Q.e 

ci:iher r:i.achine. here, using our _key tapes ,.i.ccordini:?; to e~istin~ methods.· . 

.. You have done t' ~reat ·i:rork and your contenti"n of last March 

is sustai.ned. - t!l'.lt the method of .usi.ng the printing telegral'Jh cinher as 

used 1-ast v er by the Si~al Cor-us '\'las deciphe!"o.ble. This is, perhaps, 0 0 

the,-touQ:hest individual cipher '~:ou La-ce.--e-ver :lo.d to tackle. To the :ictor 

belong the S'!')Oils! I o.n uait~ ng General Sg1Jier's retu1·n so that he per• 

sons.lly can convey to you the L·emf'\rks which i:rouJ.d otherwise hnve :to be 

· 'rubber-strimOJed' by a_subordi1ate~ JHe!lce, you vrill understand-the delay 

ir~~i s acknowledgement' of :vour message~ .He is on :eav,e and ;·.rill return 

soon. 

For ~,rour private inf.Or~tion. and not· for nublication, I am .enclosing a co•)y o·r le-t;.t,er. --·~ii ch I .ha~ ·this date -;rritten to Genero.l Church..: 

" ill. I don't '.•rant Colon~l Fabyan·-t'o ·think that Co1·.onel Mauborgne is una~nrecirtive 01' i"rr.at:.Riverbn:nl{~~s"~one·; I am '!ofng·to '1Ut this "t-li.·ng 

o'rer if I can. .I ~exp00t so~~ opn.osition· from "fardley but General Church.- · 

) 11'1 is 'o.• biggc:"m.on than some· ·people thinlc' and p17rh"ap~ Major Yardley's' op-

.. position vrill ,not ·amount t.o vt=:.ry·much.. in Ge.nere.l Churchill 1s opinion. I 

feel s~tisfied that the Chief Signal Officer will back me up in this matter; 

'however 1 I "o.m Yrell a··:are that.' there are. many slips ··•twixt the cup an'd. the 

lip and am. ~e.kin-g tbe by the .£'.Q_r·elock_ to let you kno\'i vrhat I aid trying to 

slo. ,.. · · '• I ~ 

I shouid like, however, to e-et an honest, opinion fi°om you as to 

·the t','O questions which I can't helo but harp on, or· on at J.C'a·st. one· of -

.;~hem, tecau~e you :r.ave already tpld-~e that you are_. unable ·to e;ive ~ny further cansidere.tion to· this modified form at the present time. · c·olonel 

·Hitt is.satisfied that· at loast one of the t~o methods proposed is ind~oi-

. pherable. - ,.'.'ha~ sO:y you? · . , 

I am enclosing a· cop;r of 'the deciphered tape, 

rne. ·wish:ing.you the cc;mnliments of the sea.son, I-re 

Sine 

..,,.hich you sent to \ "" 

Encl. 

l!\pproved for Releas~ by NSA. on 11-18-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

~ ------------ - ---------~---' 

·1.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6885

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

LEROY N. INGRAM,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:05-cr-00500-HEH-1; 3:16-cv-00332-HEH)

Submitted: November 15, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leroy N. Ingram, Appellant Pro Se. Angela Mastandrea-Miller, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Leroy N. Ingram seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Ingram has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0020. CALVIN SMITH v. MARK MELTON et al.

Calvin Smith seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his petition for habeas

corpus relief. Under our Constitution, the Supreme Court has exclusive appellate

jurisdiction over all casesinvolving habeas corpus. See Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VI, Sec.

VI, Par. III (4). This appeal is therefore TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for

disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 06, 2019

08/06/2019
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Amy E. Miles, Vice President and Treasurer of United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
March 29, 2006

| |  | By: |  | /s/AMY E. MILESAmy E. Miles
Vice President and Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer)
| |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
REF ID:A69996 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Washington 25, D. C. 

GENERAL ORDERS 

NUMBER 76 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY·PERSONNEL DEVi:LOPMENT BOARD 

SECTION I - RESCISSION 

SECTION II - APPOIN'IMENT 'lU NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT BOARD 

SECTION III - MEMBERSHIP ON PERMANENT.WORKING COMMIT· 

TEES OF THE PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT BOARD 

SECTION I - RESCISSION 

NSA General Orders Number S9, dated 20 Ju'.cy' l9SS1 ia herebJ' 

rescinded. 

SECTION II - APPOINTMENT TO NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT BOARD 

Pursuant to NSA Regulation Number 11-5, dated 28 December 1954, 

membership of the NSA Personnel Development Board is announced as follows= 

Members 

Maj. Gen John B. Ackerman, USA 

V/DIR, (Chairman) 

Brig. Gen. Woodbury H. Burgess, USAF 

DD/PROD 

Mr. A. B. Clark 

DD/RD 

Col. K. I. Davis, USA 

DD/COMSEC 

Dr. L • W. Tordella 

PROD 

CAPT E. S. L. Goodwin, USN 

IG 

Col. Duncan Sinclair, USA 

PERS 

Mr. Shelby L. Patterson 

TNG 

Mr. Oliver R. Kirby 

PROD 

Alternates 

CAPT D. M. Agnew, USN 

DCS/A 

Dr. A. ,Sinkov 

PROD 

Dr. S. Kullback 

R/D 

Mr. Paul E: Neff 

COMSEC 

Mr. H. J. Herczog 

PROD 

Mr. Paul Reimers 

COMP 

Mr. Thomas F. O'Brien 

PERS 

Dr. Sydney Jaffe 

TNG 

Mr. John Gregg 

PROD 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 11-06-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3 
REF ID:A69996 

GENERAL ORDERS NO. 76 

SECTION III - MEMBERSHIP ON PERMANENT WORKING COMMITTEES 

OF THE PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT BOARD 

Membership on t.he following permanent 1il<>rking aommi tteea or· the 

Personnel Development Boe.rd is announced as follows: 

Personnel Committee 

Col. Duncan Sinclair, USA, PERS 

Dr. Sydney Jaffe, TNG 

Mr. John Gregg, PROD 

Training Committee 

Mr. Shelby L. Patterson, TNG 

Mr. Thomas F. O'Brien, '.PERS 

CAPT E. S. L. Goodwin, USN 

Operations Committee 

Mr. S. Kullback,_ R_/D 

Mr. Oliver Kir'Qy-1 PROD 

Mr. Pau1 Neff' 1 CCJmEC 

BY COMMAND OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL CANINE: 

Chairman 

Chairman 

Chairman 

OFFICIAL: 

JOHN B ACKERMAN 

Major General, US Air Force 

Chief ot Staff 

Dis-rRmUTION I plus 

Individuals concerned
November 22, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ELLEN TAUB, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVEOF THE 

ESTATE OF SAMUEL TAUB, Appellant

NO. 14-16-00471-CV V.

VICTOR NARCISSE, M.D. AND DAVID HO, M.D., Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

orders signed by the court below on April 11, 2016, and May 13, 2016. Having 

considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Ellen Taub.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David W. Froesel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Omnicare, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                    

Date: May 10, 2007



/s/ David W. Froesel, Jr.David W. Froesel, Jr.Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer


---
- 568 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

297 Nebraska Report

COHAN v. MEDICAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS

Cite as 297 Neb. 568

Mary Cohan and Terry Cohan, indivi

and as wife and husband, appellant

cross-appellees, v. Medical Im

Consultants, P.C., et al., appell

and cross-appellan

___ N.W.2d ___

Filed August 25, 2017. No. S-16-145.

supplemental opin

Appeal from the District Court for Douglas County: James T.

Gleason, Judge. Supplemental opinion: Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overrule

Richard J. Rensch and Sean P. Rensch, of Rensch & Rensch 

Law, P.C., L.L.O., for appellants.

David D. Ernst and Kellie Chesire Olson, of Pansing, Hogan, 

Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for appellees Medical Imaging 

Consultants, P.C., and Robert M. Faulk, M.D.

William R. Settles and Kate Geyer Johnson, of Lamson, 

Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellees Bellevue Obstetrics and 

Gynecology Associates, P.C., et al.

Heavican, C.J., Wright, Miller-Lerman, Cassel, S

Kelch, J

Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library

www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/

11/22/2017 08:11 PM CST
- 569 -

Nebraska Supreme Court Advance S

297 Nebraska Report

COHAN v. MEDICAL IMAGING CONSULTANTS

Cite as 297 Neb. 568

Per Curiam

We consider the appellees’ motions for rehearing concerning our opinion in Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants.

1

We overrule the motions, but we modify the original opinion 

as follows:

In the section of the opinion designated “3. Cross-Appeal

by Appellees,” we add a sentence at the end of the first

paragraph,2 such that the paragraph reads as follows:

Appellees’ cross-appeals assign as error the admission 

of Dr. Naughton’s testimony. Appellees moved to strike 

Dr. Naughton’s testimony because they claimed that only 

Mary’s prognosis at the time of trial was relevant and that 

Nebraska did not recognize a theory of recovery based 

upon loss of chance. The district court, in overruling 

the motions to strike, found that Dr. Naughton’s opinion 

was relevant for the limited purpose of establishing that 

early discovery of cancer leads to a better prognosis. We 

understand the district court to have used “prognosis” to 

refer to the risk of recurrence and the probability of an 

improved outcome.

The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified.

 Former opinion modif

 Motions for rehearing overru

Funke, J., not participatin

1 Cohan v. Medical Imaging Consultants, ante p. 111, ___ N.W.2d ___ 

(2017).

2 Id. at 129-130, ___ N.W.2d at ___.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00125-CR

Thomas MENDOZA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Atascosa County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15-01-001-CRA

Honorable Donna S. Rayes, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The State’s motion to file their brief is granted. NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF 

TIME WILL BE ALLOWED. If the brief is not filed on or before November 28, 2016, the case 

will be submitted without the State’s brief.

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                       5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                  1,019,098
<SECURITIES>                                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                           3,034,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                    0
<INVENTORY>                             1,245,333
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        5,909,014
<PP&E>                                 17,610,847
<DEPRECIATION>                         11,217,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         14,019,154
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   9,130,794
<BONDS>                                   773,666
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                  439,755
<OTHER-SE>                              3,674,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           14,019,154
<SALES>                                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        1,001,250
<CGS>                                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        2,598,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        254,532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        (1,839,288)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    (1,839,288)
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                           (1,839,288)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (.04)



</TABLE>
.. REF ID:A488384 

I 

- @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-06-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a -
. . . 

•
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                  410,089
<SECURITIES>                            1,374,233
<RECEIVABLES>                           36,444
<ALLOWANCES>                            (439,787)
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        2,514,000
<PP&E>                                  194,550
<DEPRECIATION>                          (27,973)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          3,061,175
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,400,206
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                                20,154
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              1,559,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            3,061,175
<SALES>                                 115,602
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        115,602
<CGS>                                   116,986
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        657,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        229,688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      12,600
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (89,946)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (33,755)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (56,092)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.01)


</TABLE>