alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Nicholson, Appellant, vs. Coleman and another, Respondents.

*September 5*— September *26, 1895.*

*Waste: Cutting of timber by mortgagor: lAeense: Evidence.*

1. In an action by a mortgagee to restrain waste by the mortgagor, the evidence is *held*to support findings of the trial court that the' mortgagor had a license, given both before and after the mortgage-was delivered, to cut the wood from the premises, and that no» waste other than such cutting had been committed.

2. In such action, evidence of the removal of personal property which. had been sold with the land by the mortgagee to the mortgagor but was not covered by the mortgage, was properly excluded.

Appeal from a judgment of the county court of "Winne-hago county: O. D. Cleveland, Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Action to restrain waste. The facts are stated in the* opinion. The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing the complaint.

*B. E. Van Keuren,*for the appellant.

Eor the respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of-A *B. Maxwell.*

Maeshall, J.

The facts necessary to present the questions-raised are substantially as follows:

In October, 1893, *Henry W.*Nicholson, appellant, sold to *Daniel B.*Coleman, one of the respondents, a farm, together with some personal property, consisting principally of live stock and crops raised on the farm, and machinery, for the-sum of $10,000, and paid on such purchases in cash $3,700. Eor the balance the vendee gave promissory notes, secured by a mortgage on the farm. Subsequently *Frank Hurd,*while in possession of the mortgaged premises under *Coleman,*and by his authority, before any payment had been made on the notes, cut therefrom ninety cords of wood,, worth $180, which wood was standing piled on the land at *640the time of the trial. Some other acts were done by the respondents alleged to constitute waste. At the time of the commencement of the action the security was worth about $7,800, and the amount due on the notes and mortgage was somewhat less.

The trial court found that *Ooleman*had a license to cut the wood from the mortgaged premises, and apply the proceeds from a sale of the same on the notes; and that no waste had been committed, other than the cutting of wood under such license. Appellant’s counsel challenges such findings, but they must be sustained unless contrary to the clear preponderance of evidence. *Bacon v.*Bacon, 33 Wis. 147; *Tallman v.*Fitch, 49 Wis. 197; *McDonald v. Estate of*Kelly, 70 Wis. 108; *Carroll v.*Little, 73 Wis. 52. We think the evidence supports the findings excepted to, and shows that *Oolema/n*had a license to cut the wood, given both before *and after the mortgage was deO/oered.*

The evidence to show that personal property included in the sale to respondent had been removed from the farm was properly excluded. The mortgage did not cover such property ; therefore its removal could not, in any event, constitute waste.

If follows that the judgment dismissing the complaint was clearly proper and should be affirmed.

*By-the*Court.— The judgment of the county court is affirmed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-16-00527-CV

In re Germania Select Insurance Company and Shana Muske

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM HAYS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators Germania Select Insurance Company and Shana Muske have filed an

unopposed motion stating that they have reached a settlement agreement with the real party in

interest and requesting that this original proceeding be dismissed. We grant the motion and dismiss

the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Filed: November 18, 2016
MAGIC FAR EAST SUMMAR! 

NAVAL SECTION 

No. -271 

29 Nov 44 

REF •ID: A65(46 ~ ' I I I I • I ! •I 

I I I 

' I 

C..1 " - ... 

-

I -

I 

l • 

1~- \I 

4. Japanese-Intelligence on U~ S. Fleet Dispositions and 

Equipment: 

b. Use of Nev D/F in Pacific: On 24 Wov-the Japanese NavalAttache in Ge:rman7 intorme'd Tokfo that the Allies were 

pl.8.nning to use in the Pac1r1c·("aeveral months from now") 

a new long-wave s7stem of direction.-tinding.. The message gives details stated to have been obtained trom a P/w, and 

adds that the new s7stem was acc'Ul'ate to within two or thre~ 

. square miles vheh stati.ons in Scotland and North Africa we~e used to D/P positions in Ger.many. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-25-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

1 . .
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Unigene Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Jay Levy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Jay Levy           
|Jay Levy               
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 15, 2004      



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2330 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2330

   To amend the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to clarify certain 
       matters relating to State funding, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2021

 Mr. Grassley (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to clarify certain 
       matters relating to State funding, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Assisting Broadband Connectivity Act 
of 2021''.

SEC. 2. STATE FUNDING UNDER RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE PROGRAMS.

    (a) Eligibility of Projects That Receive State Funding.--Title VII 
of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 (7 U.S.C. 950cc et seq.) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 704. ELIGIBILITY OF PROJECTS THAT RECEIVE STATE FUNDING.

    ``In administering any broadband or telecommunications program, the 
Secretary, acting through the Administrator of the Rural Utilities 
Service, shall not determine that a project is ineligible for funding 
because the project has received funding from a State.''.
    (b) State Funds To Satisfy Matching Requirements.--For purposes of 
any matching funds requirement under any program administered by the 
Secretary of Agriculture, acting through the Administrator of the Rural 
Utilities Service, an applicant for funding under that program may use 
funds received from a State program (including funds received by a 
State from the Federal Government) to satisfy the matching funds 
requirement.
                                 <all>
```
REF ID:A39668 

ADDRB880NLY 

IMl8SIONIR CIF PATllNTS 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 

• 

Ootobe• 26, 1'4-5 

In oompllanee •1th th• requeat 1n 'b• 

letter or ti. Seon'U'f ot lfut, ~ate4 Oo'ob•r 12, 

1945, th1• applloatlon 1• ·aontlnued under 'h• 

prov1a1on• ot u. s. Code, 'lltl• '~• Seotlon '?• 

th1• applloa,lon. •111 not beo011tt abandoned 

p:r1o~ to the •~lra\lon ot tbr .. J'••• r.. the 

Wl111&a D. Ball 

Patent Seot1oo. 

8lpal Corp1 

War I.4panmen' Yfallhlngton, D. c. 

Ptrat .Aaala 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 01-02-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
# C_2015084EN.01000301.xml

| 12.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 84/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 84/3

---

New national side of euro coins intended for circulation

(2015/C 84/04)

Image

Euro coins intended for circulation have legal tender status throughout the euro area. For the purpose of informing the public and all parties who handle the coins, the Commission publishes a description of the designs of all new coins (1). In accordance with the Council conclusions of 10 February 2009 (2), euro-area Member States and countries that have concluded a monetary agreement with the European Union providing for the issuing of euro coins are allowed to issue commemorative euro coins intended for circulation, provided that certain conditions are met, particularly that only the 2-euro denomination is used. These coins have the same technical characteristics as other 2-euro coins, but their national face features a commemorative design that is highly symbolic in national or European terms.

1

2

Issuing country
  : the Republic of San Marino

Issuing country

Subject of commemoration
  : 90th anniversary of the death of Giacomo Puccini

Subject of commemoration

Description of the design
  : The designs shows a portrait of the composer Giacomo Puccini. At the right the name of the issuing country, in semi-circle, ‘SAN MARINO’. At the left the inscription ‘G. PUCCINI’ and the mint mark. At the bottom the year ‘2014’.

Description of the design

The coin’s outer ring depicts the 12 stars of the European flag.

Number of coins to be issued
  :

Number of coins to be issued

Date of issue
  : September 2015

Date of issue

---

(1)  See OJ C 373, 28.12.2001, p. 1 for the national faces of all the coins issued in 2002.

1

(2)  See the conclusions of the Economic and Financial Affairs Council of 10 February 2009 and the Commission Recommendation of 19 December 2008 on common guidelines for the national sides and the issuance of euro coins intended for circulation (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 52).

2

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration

Pursuant to Public Law 92-463, notice is hereby given that the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's (SAMHSA) Center for Substance Abuse Prevention (CSAP) Drug Testing Advisory Board (DTAB) will meet via web conference on April 9, 2015, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. E.D.T.

The Board will meet in closed session to discuss confidential research data, as well as proposed revisions to the Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs. Therefore, this meeting is closed to the public as determined by the Administrator, SAMHSA, in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4), 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and 5 U.S.C. App. 2, Section 10(d).

                    Meeting information and a roster of DTAB members may be obtained by accessing the SAMHSA Advisory Committees Web site,                     *http://www.samhsa.gov/​about-us/​advisory-councils/​drug-testing-advisory-board-dtab,*                     or by contacting Dr. Cook.                

*Committee Name:*                         Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Center for Substance Abuse Prevention Drug Testing Advisory Board.                    

*Dates/Time/Type:*                         April 9, 2015, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. E.D.T.: CLOSED.                    

*Place:*                         SAMHSA Building, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Rockville, Maryland 20850.                    

*Contact:*                         Janine Denis Cook, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official, CSAP Drug Testing Advisory Board, 1 Choke Cherry Road, Room 7-1043, Rockville, Maryland 20857,                         *Telephone:*                         240-276-2600,                         *Fax:*                         240-276-2610,                         *Email: janine.cook@samhsa.hhs.gov.*

Janine Denis Cook,

Designated Federal Official, DTAB, Division of Workplace Programs, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.

[FR Doc. 2015-05749 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4162-20-P
Carol Nielsen - 2006 Kennecott smelter sulfur input

From:

To:

Date:

Subject:

Hi Carol,

"Kaiser, Chris (KUCC)"

"Carol Nielsen"

10/312007 11: 11 AM

2006 Kennecott smelter sulfur input

In response to your question regarding 2006 smelter sulfur input for the WRAP inventory, here is our actual sulfur input:

Concentrate fed to flash smelting furnace: 1,012,056 tons

Average sulfur content (-7,700 conc. samples submitted for XRF analysis):

Total sulfur processed: 280,340 tons (sulfur basis)

560,679 (sulfur dioxide basis)

Let me know if you need anything further.

Regards,

Chris Kaiser

569-7427

27.7%

file://C:\Documents and Settings\cnielsen\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\470378E2EQDOMAINEQAIR... 10/10/2007
REF ID:A521649 

IN TH;;; UNITIID STATRS PATI1IT OFFICF. 

Applicant: Vi. F. Friedman 

Serial No: 107,244 

Filed: 

For: 

Oct.ob or 2.3, 1936 

Cryptographs 

Div. 53 

Hon. Commissioner of Patents, 

Washington, D. C. 

Sirs 

follows: 

In response to office action of March 26 1 1941, please amend as 

Cancol Claim 1. 

Claim 2, line 5, after nmembers" insert. varying in size 

line 6, after "members" insert 1tep b1 gtep . 

line 7, after "keyboardn cancel the remainder of the 

olaim and insert electrical contact deyi,cee arranged to be engaged by the 09 on eaid members, 

and means controUed by the clo!!in!t or an eJ.ectrioy circuit. by eaid contact deviceg to cause step 

by step disR1acegents of the commutators, 

Claim 3, line 5, before "means" insert pawl and ratchet 

line 6, after "members" insert step by: st.ep 

Claim 4, line S, cancel "coordinating said sets of" and insert. 

engageable by the cams of the 

Claim 14, lines l3 and ia, cancel "depending on" and insert 

responsiye to 

A reconsideration of the claims as amended is requested, aa these 

claims are now considered to be in proper fom and rrae trom anticipation 

-1-

t"pproved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352ff 

. ii 
REF ID:A521649 

by the references of record. ClAims 2, 3 nnd 4 specifically set forth 

the step by step movements of the cam bearing members to produce step 

by stop movement!'! of the commutators, It will be noted that the claims 

call for a plurality or a set or c~bearing members. The patent to 

Damm, of record, shows a single chain with car.te 24a and 24b thereon. Damm does 

not disclose a plurnlity of Cant···bearing members and accordingly would be 

incapable of producing the same result as that produced hr applicant•s 

device. 

A reconeideration of claims ;, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 1.3 is requested 

as these claims set forth the step by step movements of the cam bearing 

members and the commutators and spocif y n plurality of cam bearing members 

and the commutators and specify a plurality of cam bearing members. It ie 

not understood why the examiner considers these claims as functional as 

they set. forth euff icient structure to accomplish the desired result. It 

the examiner persists in his grounds of rejection, it is requested that he 

explain his reasons in 100re detail. 

Claim 14, as amended, is believed to overcome the examiner's objection and to be now allowable. 

In view of the above differentiations and the inadeq11aey of the 

Da.mrn. patent, which shows a single chain, and not a plurality of cam bearing 

members~ a favorable action is requested, 

While a "use" is ordinarily not patentable, the claim 15 is directed t.o a met.hod, 1. e., a series of steps: A series.of steps warrants 

a method claim, Smith v. Snow 294 U .s. 1. 

Claim 15 has been retained in the case as the prosecution 1fill be 

continued under the three-year rule. 

-2-

Respectfully submitted, 

William D. Hall, 

Attorney for Applicant.
REF ID:A52206"6 

wee/gab 

February 2, l13L. 

MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. Rowe, Patent Section, Room 1713. 

1. Referring to the attached correspondence, the Chief Signal 

Officer directs the Patent Section to take the necessary steps to 

secure the issu8Ilce of a patent upon the patent application, Serial 

No. 583,.344, Cryptographic System. 

Attached: 

correspondence. 

WALTER C. ELLIS, 

Ca.pt., Signal Corps. 

• 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2515 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2515

 To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to treat attendance at an 
  institution of higher education the same as work for the purpose of 
 determining eligibility to participate in the supplemental nutrition 
                          assistance program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 28, 2021

Mrs. Gillibrand (for herself, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Smith, Mr. Leahy, Mr. 
Booker, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and 
                                Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to treat attendance at an 
  institution of higher education the same as work for the purpose of 
 determining eligibility to participate in the supplemental nutrition 
                          assistance program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Enhance Access To SNAP Act of 2021'' 
or ``EATS Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF ATTENDANCE AT AN INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION 
              FOR PURPOSES OF SNAP ELIGIBILITY.

    (a) In General.--Section 6 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 
U.S.C. 2015) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(4), by striking ``employed'' and 
        inserting ``attending an institution of higher education (as 
        defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
        U.S.C. 1002)) or employed, in the aggregate,''; and
            (2) in subsection (o)(2)(A), by striking ``work'' and 
        inserting ``attend an institution of higher education (as 
        defined in section 102 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 
        U.S.C. 1002)) or work, in the aggregate,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--This section and the amendments made by this 
section shall take effect on January 2, 2022.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000352944
<NAME> STRIKER INDUSTRIES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         370,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,148,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (489,671)
<INVENTORY>                                     53,721
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,400,130
<PP&E>                                      18,652,206
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,157,419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,757,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,347,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,184,913
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,184,115)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,757,773
<SALES>                                         11,261
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,261
<CGS>                                          234,960
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,018,509
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             241,689
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,248,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,248,937)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DONALD C. EICHLER,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 315 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal and Application to File Supplement to Petition for Allowance of Appeal are 

DENIED.