alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CA2014334EN.01000801.xml

| 25.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 334/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 334/8

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

2014/C 334 A/02

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |
| 283 | |
| 289 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 293 | (NL) |
| 295 | (MT) |
| 297 | |
| 299 | |
| 304 | |
| 321 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 325 | (SL) |
| 332 | |
| 334 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

283

289

(DE/EN/FR)

293

(NL)

295

(MT)

297

299

304

321

(DE/EN/FR)

325

(SL)

332

334

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Chief Judge Wiley Y. Daniel

Civil Action No. 09-cv-02990-WYD-MEH

WILDEARTH GUARDIANS,

Plaintiff,

v.

KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior,

Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER

ORDER ENTERED BY CHIEF JUDGE WILEY Y. DANIEL

On March 30, 2010, Plaintiff filed its Proposed Scheduling Order (docket #35). In

the proposed order, Plaintiff states the following

Guardians filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on February 2, 2010.

The Secretary filed his Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary

Judgment on March 22, 2010. Guardian’s Reply in Support of its Motion is

due on April 5, 2010. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c)(1)(C). The Secretary also

filed a motion under Rule 56(f) to seek discovery on Plaintiff’s standing.

Guardians now intends to conduct discovery during the same time period

on the Secretary’s resources and obligations that may impact his ability to

provide the relief Guardians requests in its Motion, and no longer opposes

continuing summary judgment proceedings until after the close of

discovery. The parties agree that the recently-filed opening and response

briefs should be withdrawn and the parties should file a new round of

briefs by the dispositive motion cut-off date. The parties agree to a

dispositive motion cut-off date of August 30, 2010.

(Proposed Order at 8.) Accordingly, the following motions (docket #15, #30, and #31)

are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

Dated: April 5, 2010.
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We have issued our reports dated March 9, 2007 accompanying the consolidated financial statementsand Schedule II, and management’s assessment of the effectiveness of Famous Dave’s of America,Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting. Both reports are included in the annual reportof Famous Dave’s of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the RegistrationStatements of Famous Dave’s of America, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No.’s 333-86358, 333-48492,333-95311, 333-54562, 333-65428, and 333-73504) and Forms S-8 (File No.’s 333-88928, 333-88930,333-88932, 333-16299, 333-49939, and 333-49965)./s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPMinneapolis, Minnesota
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1003 

KA 14-00087 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RONALD THOMAS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (ROMANA A. LAVALAS

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of

the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of

the Onondaga County Court (Joseph E. Fahey, J.), entered December 18,

2013. The order denied the motion of defendant pursuant to CPL

article 440. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously reversed on the law and the matter is remitted to Onondaga

County Court for a hearing pursuant to CPL 440.30 (5). 

Memorandum: We agree with defendant that County Court erred in

denying without a hearing his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate

his judgment of conviction on the ground that he did not receive

effective assistance of counsel. Defendant averred that defense

counsel failed to advise him that he would be sentenced as a

persistent violent felony offender if convicted after a trial, rather

than as a second violent felony offender. Defendant further averred

that he was prejudiced thereby because he would have accepted a plea

offer had he known his actual predicate status. The record indicates

that defense counsel, the court, and the People all failed to realize

until after the trial started, when there were no further plea

negotiations, that defendant would be a persistent violent felony

offender if convicted. We conclude that defendant’s submissions raise

factual issues that require a hearing (see CPL 440.30 [5]; People v

Hill, 114 AD3d 1169, 1170; People v Wimberly, 86 AD3d 651, 652-653;

People v Howard, 12 AD3d 1127, 1127-1128). We therefore reverse the

order and remit the matter to County Court to conduct a hearing on

defendant’s motion.

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
# EUR-Lex - - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

#

**Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.7195 — Lotte/Nestle/Lotte Nestle Korea JV) Text with EEA relevance **

*
Official Journal C 089 , 28/03/2014 P. 0001 - 0001 *

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.7195 — Lotte/Nestle/Lotte Nestle Korea JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 89/01

On 18 March 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

- in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

- in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7195. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

--------------------------------------------------
# C_2014224EN.01002601.xml

| 15.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 224/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 224/26

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

14 July 2014

2014/C 224/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3627 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,29 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4568 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79660 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2482 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2139 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4100 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,439 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 309,68 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1388 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4180 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8881 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4500 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4619 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5611 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5457 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6897 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 388,46 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5806 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4566 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6130 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 903,49 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3360 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,215 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,7905 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,784 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0231 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6960 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,8301 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3627

JPY

Japanese yen

138,29

DKK

Danish krone

7,4568

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79660

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2482

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2139

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4100

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,439

HUF

Hungarian forint

309,68

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1388

RON

Romanian leu

4,4180

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8881

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4500

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4619

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5611

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5457

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6897

KRW

South Korean won

1 388,46

ZAR

South African rand

14,5806

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4566

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6130

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 903,49

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3360

PHP

Philippine peso

59,215

RUB

Russian rouble

46,7905

THB

Thai baht

43,784

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0231

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6960

INR

Indian rupee

81,8301

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Order entered March 16, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00918-CR

ORINTHIOUS DEONTE BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1241281-I

ORDER

The Court GRANTS appellant’s March 15, 2015 second motion to extend time to file his 

brief. We ORDER appellant’s brief filed as of the date of this order. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# C_2015218EN.01000101.xml

| 3.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 218/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 218/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7584 — International Chemical Investors/INEOS Chlorovinyls Business)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 218/01)

On 9 June 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7584. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7584. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Hennion & Walsh, Inc. 487


Exhibit 4.1



 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


240 Greenwich
Street, 22W Floor, New York, NY 10286


 


 


 


October 7, 2021


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


SmartTrust 536 (the “Fund”)


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York Mellon
is acting as trustee for the Fund, consisting of the unit investment trusts (the “Trusts”) included in the Registration
Statement relating to the Fund. We enclosed a list of the securities to be deposited in the Trusts on the date hereof. The prices indicated
therein reflect our evaluation of such securities as of close of business on October 6, 2021, in accordance with the valuation method
set forth in the applicable Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreements. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New
York Mellon as the party performing the evaluations of the Trust securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-258215) filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Units of the Trusts and to the filing of this
consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                          


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**467 CA 14-01440**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

VINCENT D. IOCOVOZZI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
BONNETTE IOCOVOZZI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

LORRAINE H. LEWANDROWSKI, HERKIMER, FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT. LEVITT & GORDON, NEW HARTFORD (DEAN L. GORDON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Herkimer County (Erin P. Gall, J.), entered October 17, 2013. The order granted the motion of defendant for an award of expert fees and counsel fees. Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance signed by the attorneys for the parties on March 23, 2015, It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: May 1, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 23.1

The
Board of Directors
Guitar Center, Inc.

We
consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-88677, 333-88675, 333-26257, 333-39364, 333-62608,
333-62610, 333-62732, 333-65220, 333-98127 and 333-88244) on Form S-8, S-3 and S-4 of Guitar
Center, Inc. of our report dated February 11, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Guitar Center, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001
and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, and related financial
statement schedule, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Guitar Center, Inc. Our report refers to the adoption of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."





Los
Angeles, California
March 14, 2003

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 95-7284 VADEN LEE WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge. (CR-91-70-N, CA-95-401-2) Argued: June 3, 1996 Decided: August 29, 1996 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL ARGUED: Bruce Charles Bishop, Third Year Law Student, Russell S. Post, Third Year Law Student, Appellate Litigation Clinic,UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Kent Pendleton Porter, Assistant United StatesAttorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Neal L. Walters, Appellate Litigation Clinic, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United StatesAttorney, Mark A. Exley, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________ OPINION PER CURIAM: The defendant, Vaden Lee Williams, appeals the district court's denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. That court held thatcivil forfeiture of an instrumentality of criminal activity is not punishment for purposes of the double jeopardy clause. Following briefing and oral argument on June 3, 1996, before this court, the Supreme Court decided that civil in rem forfeiture is not punishment for purposes of the double jeopardy clause. United States v. Ursery , 65 U.S.L.W. 4565 (U.S. June 24, 1996). The parties have submitted to us memoranda on the effect of Ursery , and counsel for Williams agrees that the Supreme Court's Ursery decision controls this aspect of the case. We have not found any error, however claimed, in the decision of the district court. The judgment of the district court denying the defendant's petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is accordingly AFFIRMED

. 2
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00372-CV

EX PARTE MILTON LEE GARDNER

From the 77th District Court

Limestone County, Texas

Trial Court No. J-291-A-1

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file his motion for rehearing is granted. 

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due November 28, 2016.1 Appellant’s duties as a 

“jailhouse lawyer” will not be accepted as a reason for further extensions. 

PER CURIAM

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted

Order issued and filed November 23, 2016

 

1 Appellant is incorrect in stating that his motion for rehearing is due on November 12, 2016. It was due 

October 26, 2016. TEX. R. APP. P. 49.1 (“A motion for rehearing may be filed within 15 days after the court 

of appeals’ judgment....”). The extension is granted for 33 days from the date his motion for rehearing was 

due. The extra three days account for a holiday and the weekend.
ACCEPTED 03-15-00441-CV 6144191 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 7/20/2015 4:39:11 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
# C_2015092EN.01000201.xml

| 19.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 92/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 92/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

18 March 2015

(2015/C 92/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,0592 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 128,35 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4591 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,72300 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,3325 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,0627 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,9000 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,318 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,00 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1466 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4493 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7793 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,3901 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3583 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 8,2178 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,4461 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,4735 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 196,29 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,1048 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 6,5982 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6460 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 13 956,88 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 3,9292 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 47,496 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 64,9000 |
| THB | Thai baht | 34,878 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,4283 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,3169 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 66,4754 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,0592

JPY

Japanese yen

128,35

DKK

Danish krone

7,4591

GBP

Pound sterling

0,72300

SEK

Swedish krona

9,3325

CHF

Swiss franc

1,0627

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,9000

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,318

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,00

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1466

RON

Romanian leu

4,4493

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7793

AUD

Australian dollar

1,3901

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3583

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

8,2178

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,4461

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,4735

KRW

South Korean won

1 196,29

ZAR

South African rand

13,1048

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

6,5982

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6460

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

13 956,88

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

3,9292

PHP

Philippine peso

47,496

RUB

Russian rouble

64,9000

THB

Thai baht

34,878

BRL

Brazilian real

3,4283

MXN

Mexican peso

16,3169

INR

Indian rupee

66,4754

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Exhibit 32

Certification Pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), As Adopted

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Southeastern Banking Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Cornelius P. Holland, III, President &
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CORNELIUS P. HOLLAND, IIICornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO/s/ ALYSON G. BEASLEYAlyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer


Date: November 14, 2006
# C_2014383EN.01000201.xml

| 29.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7360 — 21st Century Fox/Apollo/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 383/02)

On 9 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7360. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7360. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---