[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15553-15554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06752]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-533-843]


Certain Lined Paper Products From India: Partial Rescission of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an 
administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain lined

[[Page 15554]]

paper products (CLPP) from India.\1\ The period of review (POR) is 
September 1, 2013, through August 31, 2014, and the Department 
initiated the review with respect to seven companies.\2\ We are 
rescinding the review with respect to three companies for which review 
requests were timely withdrawn.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less 
Than Fair Value: Certain Lined Paper Products from the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Certain Lined 
Paper Products from India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of 
China; and Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Lined Paper 
Products from India and Indonesia, 71 FR 56949 (September 28, 2006) 
(CLPP Order).
    \2\ The seven companies are: Kokuyo Riddhi Paper Products 
Private Limited (Kokuyo Riddhi), Marisa International (Marisa), 
Navneet Publications (India) Ltd./Navneet Education Limited 
(Navneet), Pioneer Stationery Private Limited (Pioneer), Riddhi 
Enterprises, SAB International (SAB), and Super Impex (AKA M/S Super 
Impex) (Super Impex).
    \3\ The three companies include: Marisa, Pioneer, and Super 
Impex. Although Kokuyo Riddhi and Navneet filed timely withdrawal 
requests, petitioners' withdrawal request did not include a 
withdrawal of Kokuyo Riddhi and Navneet, companies for which the 
petitioners requested a review. Therefore, Kokuyo Riddhi and Navneet 
remain subject to the instant review.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
DATES: Effective March 24, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy Robinson or George McMahon, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-3797 
or (202) 482-1167, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 2, 2014, the Department published a notice of 
opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty 
order on certain lined paper from India.\4\ Pursuant to requests from 
interested parties, the Department published in the Federal Register 
the notice of initiation \5\ of this antidumping duty administrative 
review with respect seven companies for the period September 1, 2013, 
through August 31, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or 
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative 
Review, 79 FR 51958 (September 2, 2014).
    \5\ See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Reviews, 79 FR 64565 (October 30, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rescission of Review, in Part

    Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an 
administrative review, in whole or in part, if a party that requested a 
review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication 
of the notice of initiation of the requested review. The instant review 
was initiated on October 30, 2014. Accordingly, the deadline to timely 
file withdrawal of review requests was January 28, 2015.
    Petitioners submitted requests for review with respect to the 
following seven companies: Kokuyo Riddhi, Marisa, Navneet, Pioneer, 
Riddhi Enterprises, SAB, and Super Impex.\6\ On December 12, 2014, 
Navneet timely withdrew its request for administrative review. On 
January 28, 2015, the petitioners timely withdrew their request for 
administrative review of Marisa, Pioneer, and Super Impex. On January 
28, 2015, Kokuyo Riddhi withdrew its request for administrative review. 
Thus, the aforementioned withdrawal requests are timely because they 
were filed within the 90-day deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Petitioners' letter dated September 30, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1) and consistent with our 
practice,\7\ we are rescinding this review with respect to Marisa, 
Pioneer, and Super Impex. The instant review will continue with respect 
to Kokuyo Riddhi, Navneet, Riddhi Enterprises, and SAB.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See, e.g., Brass Sheet and Strip from Germany: Notice of 
Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 73 FR 49170 
(August 20, 2008); Certain Lined Paper Products from India: Notice 
of Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Extension of Time Limit for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Review, 74 FR 21781 (May 11, 2009).
    \8\ Kokuyo Riddhi and Navneet remain in the instant review 
because the petitioners' withdrawal request did not include these 
two particular companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment

    The Department will instruct Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 
assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. For the companies 
for which this review is rescinded, i.e., Marisa, Pioneer, and Super 
Impex, antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash 
deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, 
or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, during the period 
September 1, 2013, through August 31, 2014, in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(c)(1)(i).
    The Department intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions 
directly to CBP 15 days after publication of this notice.

Notification to Importers

    This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing duties 
prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. 
Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's 
presumption that reimbursement of antidumping and/or countervailing 
duties occurred and the subsequent increase in the amount of 
antidumping duties assessed.

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

    This notice serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
an APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to 
govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4).

    Dated: March 18, 2015.
Gary Taverman,
Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing 
Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2015-06752 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P