alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841*et seq.*) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 17, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (Chapelle Davis, Assistant Vice President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309:

                    1.                     *Sunshine Bancorp, Inc.,*                     Plant City, Florida; to become a bank holding company by acquiring 100 percent of the voting shares of Community Southern Holdings, Inc., and its subsidiary, Community Southern Bank, both of Lakeland, Florida.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 18, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-06560 Filed 3-20-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06-09-00082-CV

______________________________

LESLIE LEE BROWN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

 

On Appeal from the 336th Judicial District Court

Fannin County, Texas

Trial Court No. 22760

 

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Morriss
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Leslie Lee Brown has filed a notice of appeal from an order that directed the inmate trust

account of this indigent defendant to be garnished under the authority of Section 501.014 of the

Texas Government Code. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 501.014 (Vernon 2004).

In order to perfect an appeal to this Court from the April 9, 2009, order of garnishment,

Brown was required to file a notice of appeal within thirty days of that date, on or before May 11,

2009. See TEX.R.APP.P.26.1. The rule also provides a fifteen-day grace period, which would have

expired May 26, 2009. This notice of appeal was filed August 26, 2009. It is untimely, and cannot

serve to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.

We have no jurisdiction over this appeal. There being no timely notice of appeal from the

garnishment, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: September 8, 2009

Date Decided: September 9, 2009
*Friday, July 9, 1999*

MOTION DOCKET

98-2061.

#### State v. Franklin.

Montgomery C.P. No. 97CR1139. This cause is an appeal from a judgment of conviction and sentence of death entered by the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County on November 24, 1998. The record was filed on February 8,1999, making appellant’s brief due May 10,1999.

On May 10,1999, appellant’s counsel Richard A. Nystrom filed a request for extension of time to file appellant’s brief. On May 13, 1999, appellant’s counsel Risa C. McCray filed the instant motion to withdraw as counsel. On May 17,1999, this court extended the time for filing appellant’s brief to May 20, 1999. No brief has been filed on behalf of appellant. Upon consideration of the motion of Risa C. McCray to withdraw as counsel,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion of Risa C. McCray to withdraw as counsel be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that Richard A. Nystrom be, and hereby is, removed as counsel for appellant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the Ohio Public Defender be, and hereby is, appointed to represent appellant.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellant’s brief shall be due within ninety days of the date of this entry, that appellant’s newly appointed counsel is permitted to seek an extension for the filing of appellant’s brief in accordance with S.CtPrac.R. XIV(3)(B)(2), and that the parties shall otherwise proceed in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. XIX(5).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the Clerk shall make a report to the Committee on the Appointment of Counsel for Indigent Defendants in Capital Cases, in accordance with the provisions of Sup.R. 20(V)(A), regarding the performance of Richard A. Nystrom and Risa C. McCray as appellant’s counsel in this cause.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                           <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             1,180
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      7,533
<ALLOWANCES>                                         939
<INVENTORY>                                        9,513
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  19,581
<PP&E>                                            20,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (10,250)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    34,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             24,498
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              96
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      34,411
<SALES>                                            8,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   8,216
<CGS>                                              4,039
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      3,883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   611
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (317)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        (114)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (203)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (203)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (.02)
        


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**SECTION 1350CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies thatto his knowledge the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal periodended March 31, 2008 of Allstate Life Insurance Company filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of Allstate Life InsuranceCompany.

 

 

May 13, 2008

 
|   | /s/ James E. Hohmann                               |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | James  E. Hohmann                                  |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer              |
|   |                                               |
|   |                                               |
|   | /s/ John C. Pintozzi                               |
|   | John C. Pintozzi                                   |
|   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

E-5

----
<PAGE>



                               POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Lawrence E. Kreider and Joram C. Salig or any of them, each acting alone, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution,
for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection
with the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (the "Form 10-K") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of
the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this
12th day of February, 1997.



                                                     /s/ Jerry W. Levin
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     JERRY W. LEVIN
# C_2014232EN.01000401.xml

| 18.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7181 — BNP Paribas Fortis/Bank Gospodarki Żywnościowej)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 232/07

On 14 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7181. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7181. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 21, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 21, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0154. JOEY SAMPSON v. JAMES CURETON.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

SU15CV3207
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from 
Shelter Properties III Limited Partnership 1998 Second Quarter 10-QSB
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000353282
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998   
<CASH>                                           1,659
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      398
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          26,035
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,677   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,358   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          8,188     
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0     
<PREFERRED>                                          0  
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,655    
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,547    
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,701    
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,309    
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 375    
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       392     
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     7.05<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1065 

KA 12-00433 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CHRISTIAN J. FORD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

CHARLES T. NOCE, CONFLICT DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KATHLEEN P. REARDON OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (DANIEL GROSS OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Melchor E.

Castro, A.J.), rendered May 6, 2011. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his

plea of guilty of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15

[3]), defendant contends that County Court abused its discretion in

denying his request for youthful offender status. We reject that

contention. Although defendant acted merely as a driver for his

codefendants, one of whom attacked the victim with a baseball bat and

fractured the victim’s wrist, he admitted during the plea colloquy to

having advanced knowledge of his codefendants’ intent to rob the

victim. Despite that admission, during his presentence investigation

defendant asserted that he was “suffering the consequences of a crime

he had no part in.” We note, in addition, that defendant’s guilty

plea also covered an indictment charging him with a similar, unrelated

crime that he allegedly committed the next day. For those reasons,

the probation officer who compiled the presentence report determined

that defendant failed to accept responsibility for the crime herein

and concluded that defendant’s prognosis for lawful behavior is poor. 

In light of the above, we conclude that the relevant factors support

the court’s determination denying defendant’s request for youthful

offender status (see People v Gibson, 89 AD3d 1514, 1516, lv denied 18

NY3d 924; see generally People v Amir W., 107 AD3d 1639, 1640).

To the extent that defendant contends that the court erred in

failing to address on the record the factors it considered in making

its determination, we note that, although CPL 720.20 requires the

court to determine on the record whether an eligible youth is a
-2- 1065 

KA 12-00433 

youthful offender (see People v Rudolph, 21 NY3d 497, 499), the

statute does not require the court to state on the record the reasons

underlying its determination.

Entered: November 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
TOPS~~DER 

'feF 8Eefl:E'f' BIBER 

USA OPERATIONS ORDER 

ANNEX 211-1 ( ChanBe 1) 

NAT.IONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Washinrrton 25, D. c., 29 April 1955 

CANCELLED WHEN CHANGE HAS BEEN ENTERED IN BASIC OPERATIONS ORDER ANNEX 

1. Section IV (TEXTA) ,. paragraphs 1. e.nd 2. a.re changed to read as 

follows: 

I 

"J • j I ~·.·.· .. l. 1 be the a.uthori ta.ti ;e. source for TEXTA ... on all . JActivity. NSA will publish and distribute TEXTA -~-~-~-~-~-a-,~a-.... -c~h-an_g_e_s___,i_n ...... accordance with' the information received from 

.-----. 2. TEXIN developed at NSA will be forwarded electrically to ____ I·" , 

2. Section VIII (Reporting Responsibilities) , paragraph Lb • is 

changed to read as follows: 

"b. TEXTAdispatch series. Tbls series will contain official 

TE)ffi\ data in accordance with the TEX'rA manual and such other instructions as ma.y be issued by NSA~" 

3. Section XI (Distribution) 

a. Paragraph l.a.. is changed to r~d as i'ollows: 

11 a.. TEXTA dispatch series to be forwarded electrically to 

the following: 

For Action: 

ASAFE 

I I 

SPECIAL 

~ HANDLING REQUIRED 

MQ'!' RE±.EJ',SA:B:i:.EI 'f'9 ;mFl:BlCJPf NA:'f:EeNMiS 

The Information contained in 

this document will not be disclosed 

to foreign nationals or their representatives 

COPY of 127 COPIES 

PAGE 1 of 2 PAGES 

TOP SECRET EIDER 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-14-2013 ursuant to E .0. 1352 

... . . . . . . ..... . . .. . 

.. ... .. 

... 

. • . . • • 

• 
... . . . . . . ...... .. . " . . 

... 

.. w•• 

... 

. . . • • • 

. 

TOP SE1@1P~Er:r6l!IDER 

i't'>f' S!leRBi' Ei'Bfft 

n:-JA OPERATIOUS ORDER J\NNl5X 211 .. l (Change 1) 

For Information: 

AFSCC 

OP-300." 

? • To po.ragre.ph 2 . o.. , add the foll<ming: 

( 15) COMSF.:VmfrUFLT. 

BY COMMAND OF MAJOR GENERAL ACKERMAN1 

OFFIC!AL:. 

''" -·. ·1. , ,,,.. 7; 0 -) 

'J 1' I• I I. I ·-~t-~·-:-1"'~'-~·-- u. T. CARDDTAL 

Ma.jor iNAC 

Ac~g Asst Adj Gen 

DISTR.IBtn'ION 

Special 

ALFRT.ID R. MJ\RCY 

Colonel, US Army 

Deputy Director 

Production 

'f6P S:::!C.'Rtl'f OOflt.ffiOl:i Pn.MBJ.i11 55 0915 

COJ''C or 127 cornr; 

.PJ\l'}R 2 or 2 f."..G.•13 

- 2 -

P.9 April 195~ 

TOP SECRET EIDER
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0147. CEDRIC B. PICKARD v. THE STATE.

On October 22, 2015, the trial court denied Cedric B. Pickard’s extraordinary

motion for new trial. Pickard filed an application for discretionary review of the trial

court’s order on October 21, 2016. We lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, a discretionary application must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the order to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-

35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for appeal not made

in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57)

(1989). Because this application was filed almost a year after entry of the order

Pickard seeks to appeal, it is untimely, and we lack jurisdiction to consider it. 

Accordingly, this application is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/17/2016

November 17, 2016
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2010-0032 Directorate Identifier: 2009NM213AD
DC10-28-249, R1 --- 11/6/08 DC10-28-249 ---8/7/07 MD11-28-135, R1 --- 11/6/08 MD11-28-135 ---8/8/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained inthe Supplemental AD Docket
MAY BEVIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 LindAve. Sw., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221DURING THE HOURS OF: 9a.m. and 3p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008