alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Mr. ftrnhcm nmwJ 1 

U.U- Stnol 

""- Mt"° ~.t~ row:' acoopt.a.nce o.t tho 11lvite.tiOQ 

to Y1-it tbc!t •tiQDll ~ty ~y tor tho perlo<l ot l;-7 

~ 

Mq 3854 to part.iclpat.e tn too W1"'k ot tM W>eonnt!ttee on 

Ptrtpo3e J"lu:Shle ~1c 19.uipvent* 

:tr JOU v1ll ple.."l to "1T1V~ o.t tho ~Y at lO s 30 a. n. 

CO ~ M9.r 1 1fe vUl have IOU!OW .. t tbo p:t;e t? raeet JW .. 

l • t.Mio.tne ~ie. ot ~ 'b:'&\---el ca:dcru .ad. a~ .. 

,artatUr.l ~at tor tlll8 trip. Also 1.nclosed ~or FJr ~ .. 

ftll1e:.co u ui wt.ruction sheet villi the required, ~ ao 

that ~ ~ receive ~ti.on tar ~ u:rvicea u ~tl,y 

• pceetb.w \&)Ql1 their ca:plet1on. 

A\ th1J9 tia let ae ~ JOU tot' ~ ~~ at the 

invitation t.o attend tne 391111. ~ ar all ~ ~ cf the 

EA. &oieutitio Nbiaoey Joa.rd. ¢*:1. 21 M!q'. l vUl 1-.Vft 7l'llll' ~a 

Uil. ~t..tioD request. t'Qr that metilJi ~ to ~ SOOJ:l. 

¢C; NJ 

ti:ncero~, 

VllJJ:.~fi Y" fttrtIM\n ~1YO~j 

EA Seieutitic Ad:vis&Z"'i Ike.rd 

¥/Rt Acknowledges Mt-. Dunwell•s intention to visit NBA 

4 ... 7 Mi.y • 54. .Forwards orders and travel voucher :rorms. 

Refers to 21 May- NSASAB Panel n»aeting. 

c/s 

s/ ASST (Mr Friedm'l.n) 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-

_.} .. - --
### Fw: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg , and scheduling next mtg Michael Stewart to: Tricia Crabtree 05/03/2010 11:27 AM Michael J. Stewart, Ph.D. Environmental Protection Specialist Health and Environmental Impacts Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 (919) 541-7524 stewart.michael@epa.gov ----- Forwarded by Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US on 05/03/2010 11:27 AM -----

From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US To: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Richard Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/03/2010 11:26 AM Subject: RE: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg Thanks Heidi. I think that we need to provide a briefing on everything in the package, since the decisions on monitoring are directly linked to the decision on modeling. Then if more detail is needed, Chet's folks can provide a separate briefing that we will attend. Does that sound right to you? "King, Heidi R." 05/03/2010 10:45:31 AM Thanks for your message, Lydia, 1) Thu meeting...
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi

_ R.

_ King@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Michael Stewart/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 05/03/2010 10:45 AM Subject: RE: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg

Thanks for your message, Lydia, 1) Thu meeting is in response to your suggestion that we brief the interagency group on policy decisions this week (not modeling) 2) The reviewer asked for key comments only, so what you suggest (the main group of public health commenters, UARG, API, ACC and all the state comments) would be perfect, thank you. We appreciate EPA sending these to help reviewers move more quickly, rather than asking reviewers to fish through regulations.gov. I hope you had a good weekend, heidi

-----Original Message----- From: Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Wegman.Lydia@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 10:41 AM To: King, Heidi R. Cc: Morrison.Margaret@epamail.epa.gov; Stewart.Michael@epamail.epa.gov Subject: Re: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg Heidi,I just left you a VM with a question about Thursda y ' s meeting. Mike and I also have a question about which comments you would like to have. We have about 80-100 substantive comments. We can send you the main group of public health commenters, UARG, API, ACC and all the state comments. Does this sound sufficient, or would you like to see all of them? Thanks. Lydia

From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._ King@omb.eop.gov> To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Margaret Morrison/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 04/30/2010 03:23 PM Subject: SOx NAAQS Request for follow up from Fri mtg, and scheduling next mtg

Hello Lydia and Margaret, Reviewers have asked EPA to share key comments described in the briefing today, including those from Health and Environmental Groups, Industry Groups, State and local governments cited in the presentation. Also – is EPA available the morning of Thursday, 5/6, for a teleconference on EPA’s final rule? Thanks, heidi
# C_2014258EN.01002902.xml

| 8.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 258/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 258/29

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7305 — TDR Capital/Delek Europe)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 258/04)

On 1 August 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7305. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7305. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
connection with the Annual Report of Global Matrechs, Inc. (the "Company"), on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Michael Sheppard, President, Chief Executive
Officer & Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby
certify, pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss.
1350), that to his knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





January
15, 2009




/s/ Michael
  SheppardMichael
      SheppardPresident,  Chief
      Executive Officer & Acting Chief Financial
    Officer





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Global Matrechs, Inc. and will be retained by Global Matrechs, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
s/~ 

CE>fi'iBBN'fiAf; 

NSA OPERATIONS ORDER 

NUMBER 113 (Change l) 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Washington 25, D. c., 7 June 195.5 

CANCELLED WHEN CHANGE HAS BEEN ENTERED IN BASIC OPERATIONS ORDER 

Amend Section v, paragraph 9.a. of NSA Operations Order Number 113 

as follows: 

Delete: ''(15) OCA/HICOO, Attn: SIA" 

Substitute: "(15) OCA/FRANKFURT, Attn: SIA" 

BY COMMAND OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL C.ANINE: 

OFFICIAL: 

M. 

/h-r~~ T. CARDINAL 

Major WAC 

Actg Asst Adj Gen 

DISTRIBUTION: 

Special 

eclassified and a 

AL:rnED R. MARCY 

Colonel, U.S. Army 

Deputy Director, 

Production
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

921 

CAF 15-01298 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF VICTORIA THOMAS, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JECARL ARMSTRONG, ET AL., RESPONDENTS, 

AND ROSETTA BRYANT, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

 

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (JAMES A. HOBBS OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

CHARLES T. NOCE, CONFLICT DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (KATHLEEN P. REARDON OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

TANYA J. CONLEY, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, ROCHESTER.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Monroe County (Joseph

G. Nesser, J.), dated June 24, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to Family

Court Act article 6. The order, inter alia, granted custody of the

parties’ children to petitioner with supervised visitation to

respondent Rosetta Bryant. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Memorandum: In this proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act

article 6, respondent mother appeals from an order that granted

custody of the subject children to petitioner, the children’s maternal

grandmother, with supervised visitation to the mother. “It is well

established that, as between a parent and a nonparent, the parent has

a superior right to custody that cannot be denied unless the nonparent

establishes that the parent has relinquished that right because of

‘surrender, abandonment, persisting neglect, unfitness or other like

extraordinary circumstances’ ” (Matter of Gary G. v Roslyn P., 248

AD2d 980, 981, quoting Matter of Bennett v Jeffreys, 40 NY2d 543,

544). Contrary to the mother’s sole contention on appeal, we conclude

that the grandmother met her burden of establishing the existence of

extraordinary circumstances. The record establishes that the mother

suffers from ongoing and chronic mental health issues, “which she has

failed to address adequately” (Matter of Johnson v Streich-McConnell,

66 AD3d 1526, 1527; see generally Matter of Beth M. v Susan T., 81

AD3d 1396, 1397; Matter of Brault v Smugorzewski, 68 AD3d 1819, 1819). 

The mother also has a history of alcohol abuse (see Matter of Komenda

v Dininny, 115 AD3d 1349, 1350; Beth M., 81 AD3d at 1397), as well as
-2- 921 

CAF 15-01298 

a history of “ ‘persistent neglect of the child[ren]’s health and

well-being’ ” (Matter of Barnes v Evans, 79 AD3d 1723, 1723-1724, lv

denied 16 NY3d 711). The evidence in the record establishes that the

mother’s issues resulted in an “unfortunate [and] involuntary

disruption of custody over an extended period of time” (Bennett, 40

NY2d at 546).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
----

**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**Company**
**Form 10-Q**

|   | (1) | the                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | information                contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                      Thomas S. Rooney, Jr.             |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Thomas                      S. Rooney, Jr.                 |
|   | President                      and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                                       |
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comtex News Network, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Chip Brian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge that:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




May 14, 2010


/s/ Chip BrianChip BrianPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**From:** Tracy Walters [twalters@mdaqmd.ca.gov] **Sent:** Tuesday, January 12, 2010 9:27 AM **To:** Au, Patrick@ARB **Cc:** Steckel.Andrew@epamail.epa.gov **Subject:** Submission of MDAQMD Amended Rule 1159 - Stationary Gas Turbines **Attachments:** MD 1159 clean.doc; MD 1159 clean.pdf; 1159 Final Staff Report.pdf; June 22 Continue Minute Item.pdf; Aug 24 Continue Minute Item.pdf; Sept 28 Minute Item.pdf; 1159 Reso 09 - 08.pdf; CARB Rule Eval.doc; SIP Checklist.doc Good Morning, The Governing Board of the Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD) amended Rule 1159

– Stationary Gas Turbines on September 28, 2009 . Attached for your review are the following documents pertaining to the amendment:

 Rule 1159 (Word and PDF version)  Final Staff Report  Proof of Publication (included in Final Staff Report, appendix B)  Signed Notice of Exemption, San Bernardino and Riverside Counties (included in Final Staff Report, appendix D)  June 22, 2009 Continue Minute item, Official Copy  August 24, 2009 Continue Minute item, Official Copy  September 28, 2009 Adoption Minute Item, Official Copy  Resolution 09 - 08, Official Copy  CARB Rule Evaluation Form  SIP Completion Checklist Rule 1159 is to be included in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and therefore requires submission to USEPA. Please let me know if I can provide any further information. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 

### Tracy Walters Mojave Desert AQMD Lead Air Quality Planner (760) 245 - 1661 extension 6122 Page 1 of 1

1/24/2012 file://C:\Program Files\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5103164088416144582\E ...
# C_2014274EN.01000101.xml

| 21.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7207 — Clayton Dubilier & Rice/Ashland Water Technologies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 274/01)

On 6 June 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7207. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7207. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015070EN.01000101.xml

| 27.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/1

---

Initiation of proceedings

(Case M.7278 — General Electric/ALSTOM (Thermal Power — Renewable Power & Grid business))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 70/01)

On 23 February 2015, the Commission decided to initiate proceedings in the abovementioned case after finding that the notified concentration raises serious doubts as to its compatibility with the internal market. The initiation of proceedings opens a second phase investigation with regard to the notified concentration, and is without prejudice to the final decision on the case. The decision is based on Article 6(1)(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1).

1

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their observations on the proposed concentration to the Commission.

In order to be fully taken into account in the procedure, observations should reach the Commission not later than 15 days following the date of this publication. Observations can be sent to the Commission by fax (+32 22964301) or by post, under reference M.7278 — General Electric/ALSTOM (Thermal Power — Renewable Power & Grid business), to the following address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial  information extracted from Form 10Q at
May 31, 1999 and is qualified  in its  entirety by  reference to such  financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAY-31-1999
<CASH>                                            135,000
<SECURITIES>                                    1,739,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                     105,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   40,000
<PP&E>                                             25,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (24,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  2,020,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,823,000
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              25,000
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                        172,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    2,020,000
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  132,000
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   70,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  4,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    58,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                58,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       58,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0.02



</TABLE>
REF ID:A42Bl9 

New York Times, July 14, 1946 

BRfPll: ~~i~'.~0,~E~!· I fNiiN1. .0~.fiRJtP' . ' . ~ " ~ic_,_,.. 1t./: t. 

By tort Ing t o captured :O"utch · spies till they talked, the Nazl11 

"broke" the code of Radio Orange, 

the Netherlands transmitter In 

London, and nearly wrecked the 

Dutch underground. Though this 

·happened in 1942, it has been re- vealed only recently. 

Using the names of the captured . men, the German lntelligenc.e 

agents appealed for more arms and . more agents. Forty of the latter; were seized after parachuting Into 

the Netherlands from RAF planes. 

Some were kllled and some took 

the lethal pllls they carried rather 

than face torture by Gestapo thugs. 

Spies and a transmitter were \dropped into Holland by the RAF 

. In 1941. The Dutch agents eluded 1 the Germans until the following 

l

year. Meanwhile arms, explosives, 

food and other supplies needed by 

the underground were dropped at 

·rendezvous arranged In code mes- sages to Radio Orange. 

The Germans managed to deceive the exiled Government and 

to send repeatedly for men and arms ·until a spy escaped and. 

reached London. \Vhen they k;icw 

the jig was up the Gestapo men :wirelessed: "Thanks for all .. the 

:things you have sent us." 

' .
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 21, 2016

t0914 

# Order

Clerk September 21, 2016

152426

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 152426

COA: 328492

Allegan CC: 09

- 016573

- FH

JAMES THEODORE PYLE,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2015

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the cases

of People v Steanhouse (Docket No. 152849) and People v Masroor (Docket Nos.

152946

- 8) are pending on appeal before this Court and that the decisions in those cases

may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that

the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decisions in those cases.