alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Daniels, Appellant, vs. Smith, Administrator, Respondent.

*March 22*

*April 7, 1897.*

*Appeal: Finding sustained.*

Upon appeal from a judgment of the circuit court disallowing claims against an estate, if the findings of the court are fairly supported by the evidence such judgment will be affirmed where, though the evidence on the part of the claimant is not specifically contradicted by any witness, it is rendered inherently improbable by other evidence.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Marathon county: Chas. Y. Baedeen, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor the appellant there was a brief by *John Livermore,*attorney, and Bump, *Kreutz&r dfc Rosenberry*and *0. F. Fl-dred,*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Eldred.*

For the respondent there were separate briefs by *Brown da*Pradt, attorneys, and Silverthorn, *Hurley. Ryan &*Jones, of counsel, and oral argument by *Neal Brown.*

Winslow, J.

The appellant filed two claims against the estate of his deceased brother, Morgan G. Daniels, one for $10,271.21, claimed to be due upon an account .stated, and one for $600.61, claimed to be due upon open account. Upon trial in the county court, the first claim was disallowed, and, on the second, $480.16 was allowed. Upon appeal to the circuit court, the action was tried by the court, and findings were made to the effect that neither claim was proven to be just, and both were disallowed.

The appellant claims that these findings are against the clear preponderance of the evidence. We have examined the evidence and the opinion of the trial judge, and we think the evidence fairly supports the findings. While it is true that there is evidence on the part of the claimant which is not specifically contradicted by any witness, it is also true *640that there are many facts in evidence rendering the evidence of these witnesses inherently improbable and incredible. Such facts may undoubtedly be controlling, even in the absence of specific denial or contradiction. They were so regarded by the trial judge in the case, and apparently with .good reason.

*By the*Court.— Judgment affirmed.
# C_2014232EN.01000501.xml

| 18.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 232/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 232/5

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

17 July 2014

2014/C 232/08

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3525 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,27 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4569 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79090 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2470 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2147 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3825 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,440 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 310,48 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1440 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4437 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8760 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4426 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4537 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4831 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5569 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6794 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 390,59 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5073 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3920 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6205 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 799,64 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2985 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,899 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,2590 |
| THB | Thai baht | 43,505 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0175 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,5047 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,3833 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3525

JPY

Japanese yen

137,27

DKK

Danish krone

7,4569

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79090

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2470

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2147

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3825

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,440

HUF

Hungarian forint

310,48

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1440

RON

Romanian leu

4,4437

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8760

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4426

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4537

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4831

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5569

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6794

KRW

South Korean won

1 390,59

ZAR

South African rand

14,5073

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3920

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6205

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 799,64

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2985

PHP

Philippine peso

58,899

RUB

Russian rouble

47,2590

THB

Thai baht

43,505

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0175

MXN

Mexican peso

17,5047

INR

Indian rupee

81,3833

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
# C_2014150EN.01000101.xml

| 17.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 150/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 150/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.6944 — Thermo Fisher Scientific/Life Technologies)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 150/01

On 26 November 2013, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6944. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32013M6944. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE THE PETITION OF CARRIE LA SEUR PR 21-0004

ORDER

Carrie La Seur has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the State Bar ofMontana after having been on inactive status since February 2019. IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice oflaw in the state ofMontana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six months of the date of this Order, Petitioner shall submit to the Board ofContinuing Legal Education,P.O. Box 577,Helena, MT 59624, proofofattendance at thirty hours ofapproved Continuing Legal Education to be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive status. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this y day ofMay,2021. For the Court,

Bowe r) Cireen

vv Court ood Cterk Sup

Montana reme State of 05/04/2021
Case Number: PR 21-0004
~'."·~-

... - ,• 

f· ~ 

.. . . . 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 10-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352e 
dO 

--.....---·--

·~ / l -:>('.) C(!__J 0 0 ~ -

1- - - -

1C I~~~ 

, ~ 0 Oo O 

I 

I- - - --

oo 

I...___ - -· 

I -~o _Q_ 

/( 

·---- - -

L 

- ~-· -

.~-

••. •"""' -=.--

REF ID:A414652B 

~o~ 

N \ - ~ ~ oo 0 - -. 

0 

- --- - -- -- --

- ---. -· 

---- ~- -

---- ·- -

~" 00 

-r ---:)() ~ " 0 <X;-

·---- - -· - ---

-- --

~------

---

0 0(--

---- --

x I - I 

- --- - ---- -- ------ -----

---- -
·' ~· </ /.i:; .. ~)~~~.:,(,><";,' . ',l\, ,;-___.:i.,.~)·,-.J~.: .. ::0 

···~ ......... 

TELEGRAM 

0 

December 12, 1941. 

SlJNALS HAWAIIAN DEl-'A.ttT~'ENT FORTSHAFTER TH 

CONTENTS MESSAGES AS FOLLClVS ~UOTE DNE TNENTY FIVE PLEASE TURN OVER ' ' ...____ ·- .... ,,-· . 

IMMEDIATELY BOTE I'l'EllS WHICH I REi.&UESTED 1 ONE TI'lENTY EIGHT PLEASE WIRE - Ita!EUIATELY RE THE UTTER PART OF MI ONE T~'fENTY THREE THE MOVEMENTS OF THE 

7L:ET Sllff>E~UENT TO THE FOURTH ''crRClTLAR TWO FOUR SIX OHE PLEASE KEEP THE I_"--- -- -- -

CODE LIST tr·!TIL THE LAS'!' MOMENT . .'JID IF BY ANY CHJJlCE You· HA VE AUlEADY 

DF.STROYED THEM THEY "iiILL H;;VE TO BE RF.SENT TO YOU SO PLEASE NOTIFY US OF 

'I 

TEIS FACT nn.$:IATELY THIS MESSAGE IS A PRECAUTION CIRCTLAR TliO FOUR SIX SIX 

" - ~ ---

,;E ARE GIVING A Q'ttEi',T DEAL OF THOUGHT TO THE QUESTION OF THE RETURN TO 

JAPAN OF YOUR STAFF .um THEI'R FAMILIES THEREFORE WAIT miERE YOU AP.E UNTIL 

I i'IIRE YOU AT A LATER DATE UN1.,:UOTE 

CULTON Acting. 

" ' ,._, , 

!Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-12-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
Exhibit 32.1




Certification of Chief Executive Officer




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comtex News Network, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Chip Brian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge that:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




February 16, 2010
/s/ Chip BrianChip BrianPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 18, 2016

No. 04-16-00472-CR

Yessica Y. PECINA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 15, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 491719

The Honorable Robert Behrens, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due to be filed with this court by October 26, 2016. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 38.6(a). On November 4, 2016, we advised Appellant’s court-appointed counsel Edward 

Francis Shaughnessy III that the brief was late and directed him to respond by November 14, 

2016. To date, Appellant has not filed a motion for extension of time to file the brief or the brief. 

We ORDER Appellant’s attorney Edward Francis Shaughnessy to either file Appellant’s 

brief or a motion to dismiss this appeal within TEN DAYS of the date of this order. If no brief 

or motion is filed by that date, we will abate this appeal to the trial court for an abandonment 

hearing. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). 

Appellant’s attorney is cautioned that, to protect Appellant’s rights, this court may 

“initiat[e] contempt proceedings against appellant’s counsel.” Id. R. 38.8(b)(4). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION IX

75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

4L pno 1

November 9, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Record of Communications

FROM: Frances Wicher

Office of Air Planning, EPA Region 9

TO: Docket # EPA-R09-OAR-2012-0734

On October 15, 2012, California submitted a letter to EPA stating its intention to withdraw its

submission of the 2004 San Joaquin Valley 1-I-Jour Ozone State Implementation Plan. See letter

dated October 15, 2012, from James N. Goldstene, Executive Officer, California Air Resources

Board, to Jared Blumenfeld, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 9.

In a November 8, 2012 phone call, Karen Magliano (Chief, Air Quality Data Branch, California

Air Resources Board (CARB)), confirmed that CARB’s intention is to withdrawal all aspects of

the 2004 San Joaquin Valley 1-Hour Ozone SIP including any provisions of the 2003 State

Strategy related to that SIP.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texland Drilling Program-1981, LTD, (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the Report), we,
Jerry N. Namy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and M. E. Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|By: |  | /s/ Jerry N. Namy      
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    |  | Jerry N. Namy          
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | November 13, 2003      
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ M. E. Chapman      
|    |  | M. E. Chapman          
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | November 13, 2003
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00377-CV

L.A., III APPELLANT

V.

D.A. APPELLEE 

------------

FROM THE 324TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 324-572833-15

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered Appellant’s “Voluntary Dismissal,” in which Appellant 

states he “voluntarily dismisses” his appeal because the parties have settled their 

dispute. Thus, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). 

We tax costs against Appellant, for which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.1(d), 43.4.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J. 

DELIVERED: November 17, 2016

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

**OF**

**Carlene Lloyd**

**VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE**

**OF**

**IGI, INC.**

I, Carlene Lloyd, Vice President, Finance of IGI, Inc., certify that: 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IGI, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors: 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: May 15, 2006
# C_2014351EN.01000101.xml

| 6.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 351/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 351/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 351/01

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 339, 29.9.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 329, 22.9.2014

OJ C 315, 15.9.2014

OJ C 303, 8.9.2014

OJ C 292, 1.9.2014

OJ C 282, 25.8.2014

OJ C 261, 11.8.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,the undersigned officer of Guitar Center, Inc. (the “*Company*”)hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

(i)    theaccompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the periodended December 31, 2005 (the “*Report*”) fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii)   the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|        | Date:  March 6,  2006 | /s/ BRUCE  ROSS |
|--------|--------------------------------------|-----------------|
|   | Bruce Ross                           |
|   | *Chief  Financial Officer*           |

 

----
, I 

, ,_ 

1. '.l!le pn•et SIORCD FOP'll• calle tor tt>e mnutactl:r• ot a 1otal o£ 600 

aac111ne•, of Yldah it.••• ••t1•ted. )50 would be 11eed: lnediat.11 8Dd 250 would 

be pleead SD 1.cm& tera •torep. A etudy of th• aabel' ot •chin•• •lr••dJ ieaued - bl AS-82 1iscllcatea U•t it te uen•ry to rm•• th.- eatlme\e of tbe n.-. of •chin•• to be placed la lone ten •tcr•r•· To date, 294 ucld.n•• t-••• bten 1•· 

nect; t.hirti-tw .,.. :n•ll4ed t02' oowpleticn ot the tilit.17 Attach• ~IGROD pro11"••1 ~- l ud tb1rfa'-•nen h•ft '-• 1et aside for ti. WtRKDA! Operation.. ha a total of 

''' ueh!nu bu bea co-1 tte4. " ... 'l\ 

...... 

..... 2. lnuPluel1 aa the SIGRC·D will 1)9 tte ••t common VP• aectihe uaecl in tbe 

krq tor at l••t. t't!e next fi'f• >•et·1, it 1• eonaid.eed sd"'fhable 'to :t-&.. •Prroxi• 

·~ ~ •tel.:7 • tweatJ·fS..Ye per Cftt re1t1rve of tteae maohille• et th:la Af'•OJ. Cn.e 

hmd.:red tb!rV-aevea ueb:lnea •ould be a 1.nnt)'•thr•• per cat re•ene. rue mmber end tl>oae •lreaey ...St.ted account tor 500 ot the total to be produced. Ac· 

oord!n1l7 ir it 1• reqveeted that tl'e rna!n!Df 100 SlafC'D Mcl'.ihu be prepared tor 

long ten- 1tor•1•• 

' I 

l.5 

\~ ILi..lk' '&1:.~i!:l 

Chief, Techtlicel ::itlft 

F.rtena!on 388 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

1 

,.-) r'~ 

s ~i 't;:..._,A/.- i.. -

GECRE1
' I 

l 

( -- REF ID:A68357. .. :...-

... j/ , , I 7·' 

' ~ ... 

P~O STS (l' A.pr 4•) 

D/P&A 

Mlllt-..r1 C011111WSioatio~ ~j•otiY•• 

1' I.pr 4T 

MaJ Ll,gett/2173/.1-

1. R•t•r•zic• 1a -.de to ,.0 D/'1'. tile NI() 6Ta {10 liar 6f)e ual>Jeo" U abane 

dated 9 April tT • which annoUDCed a ciont•renoo to lM hel4 ia nau and Operatlou 

D1Tia1on 021 11 .lpr1l 1947. 

2. Sine• dbpatoh ot tbl r•f'•r•noe. \bb Dlrlelon hu bffn acl'Yiled 1ty the 

ott1o•, Chief ot Sta.tr th.at the •'tud)' on 1U.111i•t'1 C01111W1ioati~ Objeotlw-t ..... 

prepared by Dootor Bowlet at th• requ••t ot 1:b9 Chlet ot Staff'. 

a. Forwarded lwr••!.~ tor 70UJ" taroriutlon la oameatlon rith t'M 1t\1d7 ot 

I>ootor Bo•l••' report are copl•• ot two •dditional papeP• whioh rta¥ prOY• to ~ 

helptu!. 

PO { ·ms DIRBCTW. ,..,., ~ • CI'EHA't'IOXBI 

2 Inol1 

1. Cy •ao tr lfDGS Ai "US s D1.,. • 

8W"ea·1e • Major Cad•• ta C/se 

dtd &o Apr 'c 

2. Cy fr••• Rele._.e of Addre11 

by c/s, 1 Ju.n. •a 

Copi•• turaiaheda 

D/OH 

v~D co .u.r 

cso 

-

. t"': ... 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a I 

'· -·-I
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Air T, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter Clark,
Chief Executive Officer, and John Parry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  July
31, 2009











/s/ Walter
Clark


Walter
Clark


Chief
Executive Officer














/s/ John
Parry


John
Parry


Chief
Financial Officer