alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB

/A No. 1

 of Shelter Properties III;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  

November 19

, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters

Vice President of Shelter Realty III Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6952

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DENNEVER LIVINGSTON, a/k/a Fatta,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (2:97-cr-00039-HCM-41)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dennever Livingston, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia; Darryl 

James Mitchell, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Dennever Livingston appeals from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a modification of his sentence. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States 

v. Livingston, No. 2:97-cr-00039-HCM-41 (E.D. Va. filed June 6, 

2016; entered June 7, 2016). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    In accordance with Section 271.25 of its rules regarding availability of information (12 CFR part 271), there is set forth below the domestic policy directive issued by the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on January 27-28, 2015.[1] 

                    Consistent with its statutory mandate, the Federal Open Market Committee seeks monetary and financial conditions that will foster maximum employment and price stability. In particular, the Committee seeks conditions in reserve markets consistent with federal funds trading in a range from 0 to                     1/4                     percent. The Committee directs the Desk to undertake open market operations as necessary to maintain such conditions. The Committee directs the Desk to maintain its policy of rolling over maturing Treasury securities into new issues and its policy of reinvesting principal payments on all agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities in agency mortgage-backed securities. The Committee also directs the Desk to engage in dollar roll and coupon swap transactions as necessary to facilitate settlement of the Federal Reserve's agency mortgage-backed securities transactions. The System Open Market Account manager and the secretary will keep the Committee informed of ongoing developments regarding the System's balance sheet that could affect the attainment over time of the Committee's objectives of maximum employment and price stability.                

By order of the Federal Open Market Committee, March 3, 2015.

Thomas Laubach,

Secretary, Federal Open Market Committee.

# Footnotes

1.                             Copies of the Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee at its meeting held on January 27-28, 2015, which includes the domestic policy directive issued at the meeting, are available upon request to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Washington, DC 20551. The minutes are published in the Federal Reserve Bulletin and in the Board's Annual Report.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-05694 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIZABETH SHERBOW; THEODORE

SHERBOW,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

 v.

NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES,

INC.; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-35462

D.C. No. 1:16-cv-00656-MO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Elizabeth Sherbow and Theodore Sherbow appeal pro se from the district

court’s order denying their motion for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the

FILED

NOV 23 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
nonjudicial foreclosure sale of their real property. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). We dismiss this appeal as moot.

After the Sherbows filed this appeal, the subject property was sold at a

nonjudical foreclosure sale and the district court issued a final judgment dismissing

the underlying action against all defendants. Accordingly, this court cannot grant

the requested relief and the appeal is moot. See Vegas Diamond Props., LLC v.

FDIC, 669 F.3d 933, 936 (9th Cir. 2012) (“[T]he sale of the real properties

prevents this Court from granting the requested relief and accordingly renders this

appeal moot.”); see also Doe & Assocs. Law Offices v. Napolitano, 252 F.3d 1026,

1029 (9th Cir. 2001) (dismissal of underlying action renders moot the district

court’s denial of a preliminary injunctive relief).

Appellees’ July 28, 2016 motion for judicial notice and October 7, 2016

motion to strike are granted.

The Sherbow’s pending motions are denied.

The Clerk shall forward the Sherbows’ August 15, 2016 supplemental notice

of appeal to the district court for filing as a notice of appeal of the final judgment

as provided by Fed. R. App. P. 4(d).

DISMISSED.

2 16-35462
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>   0000890639
<NAME>  JUST TOYS, INC.
<CURRENCY> U. S.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         234,509
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  381,717
<ALLOWANCES>                                   345,000
<INVENTORY>                                  1,963,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,004,923
<PP&E>                                       8,088,765
<DEPRECIATION>                               5,555,769
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,140,989
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,282,986
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          294,618
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        22,426
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,540,959
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,140,989
<SALES>                                     18,071,026
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            18,071,026
<CGS>                                       11,342,048
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,851,520
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             536,947
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,659,489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,659,489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,659,489)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.77)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.77)



</TABLE>
Exhibit 23.0


              Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants
              ---------------------------------------------------

We have issued our report dated October 30, 1997 on the consolidated financial
statements of Delphos Citizens Bancorp, Inc. appearing in the 1997 Annual Report
of Delphos Citizens Bancorp, Inc. to its shareholders included in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 1997 which is incorporated
by reference in this Registration Statement. We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement of the aforementioned report.


/s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP
---------------------------------
Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP


Columbus, Ohio
December 18, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,343,554
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    488,371
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,994,198
<PP&E>                                      17,363,255
<DEPRECIATION>                               8,935,799
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,155,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,683,748
<BONDS>                                      5,157,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       389,360
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,924,507
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,155,309
<SALES>                                          1,902
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,020,652
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,343,198
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             211,970
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,453,132)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,453,132)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (143,810)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,596,942)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 17, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 17, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17I0061. WELLSTAR HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. et al. v. JENNIFER PAHL et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2014A3225
EXHIBIT 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texland Drilling
Program-1981, LTD, (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the Report), I, Jerry N. Namy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Jerry N. Namy

Jerry N. Namy

Chief Executive Officer

May 14, 2003
~l!L~ . 

f 

,.,. r ·" .... ~~ 

I 

i I I I 

: I I I 

i I 

I 

I 

ii 

, I 

1 I 

: I 

1, 

\ I 

I 

i February 28, 1945. 

, '~ ~ .• ~ ~o;rupliane" wl th the re<iueoit in th<> 

. ·.> ·im:t(~'~ ot .th~ .A.Qt:tpg _:Direct~ of the Of'.f:tce o-r .; .. ;~·.-.· .•~.~nu a.~d lnYflntion•~ W1"1tt. en by direction o'f · j c . . . Secretary of t{le Navy, dated ))oeembor 15 • . :.. .,:./ .. ~ . thi• application i• placed under the 

, ··' ::'. , lpr6V~ai<!I)S . <)f 11, S, 4":do 1 ' Title ;55, Section n. · ' · · · ~<'> a$aignment ac¢ompanying said. lottert 

conveyine to the G~V$l:"Xllnent of th~ United 

State I 0£ America the' &nt1i-~ right, ti tl~ and 

lntere•t in and to the above noted application, h•• been ~acorded in aooox-danoe with the Commi••iono;'t ~ Orde:r No •. -'250, of. September 5t 19~'• for reco~~1ll$ .. •ignment• o.f application• that ·~• to bo pr.l~ery~d +n soorocy, and the •••1gnm~nt !• ~eturn•d herewith. 

'l'hit tpplicatiQn will not bocome ab~doned 

~rior ~Q the o:xpir•tion ot thr•$ year• rrom tho dat~ ar the ti~•t Otrioe action. 

.... ~ere. Commi•aioner~ 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-12-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
# EXHIBIT 99.5

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Barry Zwarenstein, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Barry Zwarenstein

Barry Zwarenstein
Chief Financial Officer
November 12, 2002
# C_2014306EN.01000101.xml

| 10.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 306/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 306/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7362 — HIG/Aviapartner)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 306/01

On 3 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7362. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7362. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


                We have issued our report dated February 6, 2004 accompanying
the consolidated financial statements included in the Annual Report of Famous
Dave's of America, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 28, 2003. We
hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the
Registration Statements of Famous Dave's of America, Inc. on Forms S-3 (File
No.'s 333-86358, 333-48492, 333-95311, 333-54562, 333-65428 & 333-73504) and
Forms S-8 (File No.'s 333-88928, 333-88930, 333-88932, 333-16299, 333-49939 &
333-49965).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP



Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 29, 2004
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00219-CR

Freddy Earl PERRYMAN,

Appellant

v.

The State of 

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 175th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012CR9136

Honorable Mary D. Roman, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 14, 2014

DISMISSED

Pursuant to a plea-bargain agreement, Freddy Perryman pled nolo contendere to sexual 

assault of a child and was sentenced to twelve years in prison in accordance with the terms of his 

plea-bargain agreement. On January 28, 2014, the trial court signed a certification of defendant’s 

right to appeal stating that this “is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). After Perryman filed a notice of appeal, the trial court clerk sent 

copies of the certification and the notice of appeal to this court. See id. 25.2(e). The clerk’s record, 

which includes the trial court’s Rule 25.2(a)(2) certification, has been filed. See id. 25.2(d). 
04-14-00219-CR

“In a plea bargain case . . . a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised 

by written motion filed and ruled on before trial, or (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to 

appeal.” Id. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain, establishes the 

punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor 

and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed 

and ruled upon before trial; nor does it indicate that the trial court gave Perryman permission to 

appeal. See id. The trial court’s certification, therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a 

plea-bargain case and that Perryman does not have a right to appeal. We must dismiss an appeal 

“if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the 

record.” Id. 25.2(d). 

We, therefore, warned Perryman that this appeal would be dismissed pursuant to Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), unless an amended trial court certification showing that 

Perryman had the right to appeal was made part of the appellate record. See TEX.R. APP. P. 25.2(d), 

37.1; Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, order). No such amended 

trial court certification has been filed. This appeal is, therefore, dismissed pursuant to Rule 25.2(d). 

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

- 2 -