alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice 9064]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                         *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                         *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition “Arctic Ambitions: Captain Cook and the Northwest Passage,” imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Anchorage Museum at Rasmuson Center, Anchorage, Alaska, from on or about March 27, 2015, until on or about September 7, 2015, the Washington State History Museum, Tacoma, Washington, from on or about October 16, 2015, until on or about January 10, 2016, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For further information, including a list of the imported objects, contact the Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

Dated: March 17, 2015.

Kelly Keiderling,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2015-06421 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
.5//1 s s r 

NSA OPERATIONS ORD1!:R 

AN.NEX 211-2 (Chan~c 1) 

I'1ATION.AL SECURITY AGENCY 

Washington 25, D. C., 25 April 1955 

CAMCELLED WHEN CHANGE HAS BEEN EHTERED IN OPERATIONS ORDER ANNEX 

Section X (Distribution), po.raB!'e.Ph L, is changed to reo.d. as 

follmrs: iJ?J:., 86-36/50 use 3605 

E03.3(h) (2) 

1. Technical Reports 

ll(orie"~~;;~m~~o~~~~s~chniceJ. notes to \NSA three o:~P~~:; j, by 

~ac;. Hi~ic;hts to this. / .· .· s VJ. \·. e·. ra.nsm·. itted to NSA 

and to the NGJ\.~ / fby electrical means-routine 

precedence. 

(one copy)~-.:a~~clm.6~ n6tl. to llSA c~f~~~:u~~;l bas. 

,...d __ e __ n__ ce .............. a .... c... ti__,on NSA ana information copies to NSAA 

c. . c:r tr·an· . ··e· s b.y· ./electrical. means, prioritv prece:.. 

.... I____ _.lLJ/a.na , ....__ ____ __. 

DY CO:MMJ\l.ID OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL CANINE: 

OFFICIAL: 

in T f!:t ~"({, l·~{J_ 

ALFRED R. MARCY 

Colonel, US Army 

Deputy Director 

Production 

'~ T. CARDINAL 

Major WAC 

Actg Asst Adj Gen 

DISTRIBUTIO?i 

Special. 

SPECIAL HANDLING REQ.UmED 

Nog:s F!B'EW.S..~:bl!l \l:1Q ~l!::mtiJ llIA Q;IIQMo:t.ial 

The Information contoined in 

this document will not be disclosed 

to foreie;n nationo.l.s or their represento.ti ves 

lftdlBfd!l VIA Selml.l' 

eitldftfi!:LB etffiY 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-14-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

SE€RET
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United StatesCode)**

** **

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, UnitedStates Code), I, John W. Elias, Chief Executive Officer of Edge PetroleumCorporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, to myknowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  theCompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,2004 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:     March  16, 2005 | /s/ John W. Elias |
|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------|
|                                                | Name:             | John W. Elias |
|                                                |              | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
JAMES THOMPSON

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 0 498

_________ ____________________/

Opinion filed June 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Ross M. Goodman and John L. Miller , Judge s

.

James Thompson , pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appel lee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL and KELSEY, JJ., and DEMPSEY, ANGELA C., ASSOCIATE

JUDGE, CONCUR.
•. ~-'-··--- ~-:wr-~-- ·---- - ·- . - -- -

REF ID:A522142 

. ., 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

aln 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

Mr. George A. Graha.r.i, 

Sign1::1l Co1·ps Laboratories, 

Fort ~or.!..louth, Uew Jersey. 

, Dear Craham: 

WASHINGTON 

March 26, 1952 

Uaey- th1>onka for your note of :!e.rch ~5. I think· that 

you tu.\ve now hit upon the real sol~tion and I hope that the 

sudden action of the stock pawl on the worM wheel v1ll not have 

& tendency to· jar tho ci~her wheel too ml6Ch. If this added link 

will \~·ork, I see no reason why a speed t'i:ice as gres.t &.s ,.~e had 

the other day cou.ld not be brought s.bou.t. 

I do not see all3" reason for hurry- with regard to the prepar~tion or patent application for the adapter. It seems to 

me that it would be better to wait until the development were 

fa.r enough a long tor u.s to see a specific Olllbodiment. :Joroover, 

1lr. llowo tells me this corning that the patent on our other nachine, 

which &leo embraces an adapter, will issue ?Jay 10, 1932. I think 

that the latter ought to cover the c&se in a prelimin&ry way. 

I believe, however, th~t we mi6ht give consideration to 

apply-ing for a ~atent on the means for driving nnd stopping the 

cipher ~heel in the present development. It may bo useful lnter 

0.11 •. 

I am going to send ~!aJor :alni·r informally a copy ot fD1 

report on tho· trip merely for his information. I hope it will 

meet gith his and yo~r approval. 

UaDiY thanks tor pleasant stay which was highly satisfactory. 

Sincerely yours,
Exhibit 21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Set forth below is a list of certain of the Registrant’s subsidiaries. Such subsidiaries are incorporated or organized in the jurisdictions indicated. Each of the listed subsidiaries is wholly owned by the Registrant, directly or indirectly, and all listed subsidiaries are included in the Registrant’s consolidated financial statements. The names of the Registrant’s remaining subsidiaries, if any, which may have been omitted from the following list, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

Domestic Subsidiaries

Almay, Inc., a Delaware corporationCharles of the Ritz Group Ltd., a Delaware corporationCharles Revson Inc., a New York corporationCosmetics & More Inc., a Delaware corporationNorth America Revsale Inc., a New York corporationPPI Two Corporation, a Delaware corporationRevlon Consumer Corp., a Delaware corporationRevlon Consumer Products Corporation, a Delaware corporationRevlon Development Corp., a Delaware corporationRevlon Government Sales, Inc., a Delaware corporationRevlon International Corporation, a Delaware corporationRevlon Products Corp., a Delaware corporationRevlon Real Estate Corporation, a Delaware corporationRIROS Corporation, a New York corporationRIROS Group Inc., a Delaware corporation

Foreign Subsidiaries

ACN 000 189 186 Pty. Limited (Australia)CEIL — Comercio e Distribuidora Ltda. (Brazil)Cendico B.V. (Netherlands)Deutsche Revlon GmbH (Germany)European Beauty Products S.L. (Spain)Européenne de Produits de Beauté S.A.S. (France)New Revlon Argentina S.A. (Argentina)Productos Cosmeticos de Revlon, S.A. (Guatemala)Promethean Insurance Limited (Bermuda)REMEA Luxembourg S.A.R.L. (Luxembourg)REMEA 1 B.V. (Netherlands)REMEA 2 B.V. (Netherlands)Revlon A.B. (Sweden)Revlon Australia Pty Limited (Australia)Revlon Beauty Products, S.L. (Spain)Revlon B.V. (Netherlands)Revlon Canada Inc. (Canada)Revlon (Cayman) Limited (Cayman Islands)Revlon Chile S.A. (Chile)Revlon China Holdings Limited (Cayman Islands)Revlon Europe, Middle East and Africa Ltd. (Bermuda)Revlon Group Limited (United Kingdom)Revlon (Hong Kong) Limited (Hong Kong)Revlon (Israel) Limited (Israel) Revlon Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan)

----

Revlon Ltda. (Brazil)Revlon Manufacturing Ltd. (Bermuda)Revlon Mauritius Ltd. (Mauritius)Revlon New Zealand Limited (New Zealand)Revlon Offshore Limited (Bermuda)Revlon Overseas Corporation, C.A. (Venezuela)Revlon Pension Trustee Company (U.K.) Limited (United Kingdom)Revlon (Puerto Rico) Inc. (Puerto Rico)Revlon Real Estate Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan)Revlon, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)Revlon (Shanghai) Limited (China)Revlon South Africa (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)Revlon S.p.A. (Italy)Revlon (Suisse) S.A. (Switzerland)Revlon Taiwan Limited (Taiwan)RGI Beauty Products (Pty.) Limited (South Africa)RGI Limited (Cayman Islands)S.E.F.A.O., S.A. (Spain)Shanghai Revstar Cosmetic Marketing Services Limited (China)YAE Artistic Packings Industry Ltd. (Israel)YAE Press 2000 (1987) Ltd. (Israel)

----
~ESTRH-E;rfD~33 .I. '-.A ..I. ..l..!.I .L"9 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY 

Washington 25, D .C. 

MEMORA1mtJM FOR DISTRIBOTIOB LIST: 

SUBJlllT: Dictograph IntercCIJlll Boxes 

J.. The Dictosraph 1ntercommm1cat1bD ottice bolcea recently iDatallecl 111 Armed Forces Secur1 ty Agemy are ot two types, 1.e., executive boXes and staff boxes. General Canine ha• the cmly executive 

box iD AJ'Sl. 

2. One atatt box can call another atatf' box by lii'ting the 

handaet from the hook, pressing the desired party black key up or 

clown, and then preaaing the preen ring key. The stall party so called 

anavera tbe call by merely lifting hie Jvmaaet ana. apeaking. 

3. An executive type box (General Canine'• Interconm box) calls 

a atatt box 'b7 merely preaaing the deaire4 :party key. The buzz in the 

atatf' box Will 'be contim10us until answered by the atatt member vho 

accomplialle• this bl" lifting hi• MM•t then preaaillg the black key 

lib.ere a white flag appeara, an4 apeakillg. A atatt 'bOX can call an 

executive box 'b7 preaail2g General Canine' 11 black key and then speaking 

into the bandset. 

4. It is to be noted. that an executive type box ia call.e4 by a 

staff' box whenever the General• a key ia depreaaed whether the handllet ia 

on or ott the hook. The ring key i• ot no ettect here. Therefore caution 

mwst be exerciaecl so tbat the General'• key 1• never c1ep.rea11e4 unleaa 

it 1• cleairecl to call General Canine. 

DIS'l: 

Aaa't to the Director (OOS) 

Deputy Db'ector l Wavy ( OOD) 

Conaul.tant (C>OrJ C a u , I 4 

Chief' ot Staff' 

Deputy Director, AP ( OOC) 

Inspector (OOY) 

Ccnptroller (oar) 

A4Jutant General ( 11) 

Chief', PlaDa & Polley Div. ( 12) 

Chief', commm1 cations Div. ( 13) 

Chief', Training Div. (14) 

Chief', Pe:raonnel Div. (15) 

Chief, Secu:rity Control Div. ( J.6) 

Chief, Logiatica Div. (17) 

OBBSON 

Lt. olcmel, Signal Corpa 

Aes1atant Chief', Ott'ice of' 

Comunication Security 

Chief', Research & Dewlopment (03) 

Chief, Ottice of coammscation Security (o4) 

RESTRICTED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 22, 2017

p0315 

# Order

Clerk March 22, 2017

154069 & (17)(18)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154069

COA: 331567

Wayne CC: 10

- 002260

- FC

TRAMMANUEL DURHAM

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 17, 2016 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motions for appointment of counsel and to remand to the trial court are DENIED.
# CA2014188EN.01003101.xml

| 20.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 188/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 188/31

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

(2014/C 188 A/02)

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5 the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

** Petitioner, a native and citizen of Mexico, was charged with being removable because inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(A)(i). Before the Immigration Judge (IJ) she conceded removability and sought cancellation of removal under INA § United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 22, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60645 Summary Calendar

MARIA LUISA OLVERA, Petitioner,

versus
ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A70 793 313

Before GARWOOD, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:* Maria Luisa Olvera petitions for review of the June 10, 2005 order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) denying her motion to reopen and reconsider.**240A(b)(1) on the basis of hardship to her United States citizen

children. The IJ denied cancellation of removal finding that the requisite hardship had not been shown. Petitioner appealed, contending that she had shown the requisite hardship. The BIA on February 10, 2005, adopted and affirmed the IJ’s decision. On March 10, 2005, petitioner timely filed a petition for review in this court (Maria Louisa Olvera v. Gonzales, #05-60187) challenging the BIA’s February 10, 2005 decision; the respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition for review for lack of jurisdiction on the basis that, under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i) & (ii), the BIA’s decision was an unreviewable discretionary determination; and on May 9, 2005, a panel of this court granted that motion of respondent and dismissed the petition for review. On May 10, 2005, petitioner filed with the BIA a motion to reopen and to reconsider its February 10, 2005 decision. On June 10, 2005, the BIA denied the motion to reopen and to reconsider. On July 8, 2005, petitioner filed the instant petition for review purportedly directed to the June 10, 2005 BIA decision. Petitioner has been represented by counsel throughout. 2 The BIA determined that the evidence cited in Olvera’s motion
to reopen could have been obtained prior to the hearing on her application for cancellation of removal. The BIA also found that Olvera’s request for reconsideration was untimely.
In her petition for review, Olvera challenges the basis for the denial of her application for cancellation of removal but does
not address the BIA’s denial of her motion to reopen and reconsider. Olvera has abandoned her challenge to the denial of her motion to reopen and reconsider by failing to brief the relevant issues. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003). The petition for review is
DENIED.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 26, 2011 

h0919 

Order 

 

September 26, 2011 

142570 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142570 

 COA: 300871 

Muskegon CC: 08-056742-FC 

ROBERT ARNOLD JOHNSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 7, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 11, 2008

/s/Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       ---------------

                                                       Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

**CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 11, 2008

/s/ Robert E. Wolfe

                                                          --------------

                                                         Robert E. Wolfe

                                                         Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
KEENAN JAMAAL VARNER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2763

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Marianne L. Aho, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public 

Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, C.J., JAY and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.
Exhibit 32. Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Southeastern Banking Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Cornelius P. Holland, III, President & Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alyson G. Beasley, Vice President &
Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ CORNELIUS P. HOLLAND, IIICornelius P. Holland, III, President & CEO/s/ ALYSON G. BEASLEYAlyson G. Beasley, Vice President & Treasurer


Date: May 15, 2006
November 22, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANTHONY DERON CARR, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00732-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.