alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6767

DR. KEVIN W. CHURCH, SR.,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROGER KENNEDY, Captain; CATHY ALDRIDGE, LPN/RN; KAREN 

SAMPLE, Sergeant, Inmate Accounts Clerk and Accounts 

Receivable,

 Defendants – Appellees,

and

EASTERN SHORE REGIONAL JAIL, Owner/Operator; EASTERN SHORE 

REGIONAL JAIL BOARD OF DIRECTORS, Governing Board; VIRGINIA 

BEACH SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Owner/Operators,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:15-cv-00653-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Kevin W. Church, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Kevin W. Church, Sr., appeals the district court’s order 

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Church v. Kennedy, No. 1:15-cv-00653-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. 

May 20, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

899 

CA 16-00357 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ. 

 

ROSEMARY WHITE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH OF BOWMANSVILLE, 

DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

 

BROWN CHIARI LLP, LANCASTER (ANGELO S. GAMBINO OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

CHELUS, HERDZIK, SPEYER & MONTE, P.C., BUFFALO (KATIE RENDA OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Frederick

J. Marshall, J.), entered May 20, 2015. The order denied the motion

of plaintiff to restore the action to the trial calendar. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Novadigm, Inc. (the
"Company") for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Wallace D. Ruiz,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1)    the report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company.



By: /s/ Wallace D. Ruiz
   --------------------
Name: Wallace D. Ruiz
Chief Financial Officer
June 30, 2003


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Novadigm, Inc. and will be retained by Novadigm, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2230 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to enhance the carbon oxide 

sequestration credit. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. LUJA ́N (for himself, Mr. BARRASSO, Mr. GRASSLEY, Ms. STABENOW, Ms. 

SMITH, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. COONS, and Mr. HOEVEN) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to enhance 

the carbon oxide sequestration credit. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENHANCEMENT OF CARBON OXIDE SEQUES4 TRATION CREDIT. 

5 (a) INCREASE IN APPLICABLE DOLLAR AMOUNT.— 

6 Subparagraph (A) of section 45Q(b)(1) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—For any taxable year 

9 beginning in a calendar year after 2021, the apVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:26 Jul 02, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2230.IS S2230

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2230 IS

1 plicable dollar amount shall be an amount equal 

2 to— 

3 ‘‘(i) for purposes of paragraph (3) of 

4 subsection (a), an amount equal to the 

5 product of $85 and the inflation adjust6 ment factor for such calendar year deter7 mined under section 43(b)(3)(B) for such 

8 calendar year, determined by substituting 

9 ‘2020’ for ‘1990’, and 

10 ‘‘(ii) for purposes of paragraph (4) of 

11 such subsection, an amount equal to the 

12 product of $60 and the inflation adjust13 ment factor for such calendar year deter14 mined under section 43(b)(3)(B) for such 

15 calendar year, determined by substituting 

16 ‘2025’ for ‘1990.’ ’’. 

17 (b) DEFINITION OF QUALIFIED FACILITY.—Para18 graph (2) of section 45Q(d) of the Internal Revenue Code 

19 of 1986 is amended to read as follows: 

20 ‘‘(2) at which carbon capture equipment in21 stalled at such facility captures qualified carbon 

22 oxide during the taxable year.’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2230 IS

1 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

3 December 31, 2021. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
lf n tbe Wniteb ~tates QCourt of jf eberal QCiaitns 

No. 16-1020C 

(Filed November 22, 2016) 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION 

************************ 

* 

* 

LAKESHA L. NORINGTON, * 

* 

Plaintiff, * 

v. * 

* 

THE UNITED STATES, ·k 

* 

Defendant. * 

* 

************************ 

ORDER 

FILED 

NOV 2 2 2016 

U.S. COURT OF 

FEDERAL CLAIMS 

On August 23, 2016, this court dismissed prose plaintiff Lakesha L. 

Norington's complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff moves for 

reconsideration of that decision, under Rule 59 of the Rules of the United States 

Court of Federal Claims, maintaining that the Court misunderstood her complaint. 

Plaintiff argues that her due process and equal protection rights were 

violated in a federal court, and that she can use 42 U.S.C. § 1983 to seek redress in 

our court. She identifies two provisions of the U.S. Constitution --- Article VI, 

clause 2 and the Fourteenth Amendment --- as the source of her rights. Pl.'s Mot. at 

3-4. As the Court explained in the earlier order, Norington v. United States, No. 

16-1020C, 2016 WL 4467617, at *2 (Fed. Cl. Aug. 23, 2016), Article VI is not moneymandating, see Marshall v. United States, 2010 WL 125978, at *3 (Fed. Cl. Jan. 14, 

2010), and the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply to the federal government. 

Fry v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 500, 508 (2006) (citing S.F. Arts & Athletics, Inc. v. 

U.S. Olympic Comm., 483 U.S. 522, 542 n.21 (1987)). Likewise, even if plaintiff 

means to assert equal protection or due process claims under the Fifth Amendment, 

such claims are not within this court's jurisdiction. See Smith v. United States, 709 

F.3d 1114, 1116 (Fed. Cir. 2013); Carruth u. United States, 224 Ct. Cl. 422, 445 

(1980). 
Finally, plaintiff misunderstands the reach of 42 U.S.C. § 1983. She argues 

that, since the provision begins with the words "[e]very person," the actions of 

federal officials must be covered. Pl.'s Mot. at 4. But Ms. Norington overlooks the 

crucial language that follows, which specifies that the persons who are liable under 

the section are those who act "under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, 

custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia." 42 U.S.C. 

§ 1983 (emphasis added). Thus, section 1983 imposes liability on state and local 

officials only, as those are the people who act under color of state, local, or District 

of Columbia law. ") 

Plaintiff has not established that any of her claims fall within our court's 

subject-matter jurisdiction. Accordingly, her motion for reconsideration is 

DENIED. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

- 2 -
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-15-00176-CR

Sean Quinn Julian

v.

The State Of Texas

On appeal from the

24th District Court of De Witt County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 14-01-11,966

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 22, 2016
• 

REF ID:A488554 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

MILITARY INTELLIGENCE SERVICE 

WASHINGTON 

4 October 1944 

MEMORANDUM FOR COLONEL CORDERMAN: 

Please furnish me another copy of each of the following 

numbered messages: 

c 

0 

p 

y 

23570) 

23516) 

23673 

23859 

24373 

24655-6 

24878 

25138 

25390 

25435-6 

25441-2 

25446 

25496 

25548 

25554-5 

25660 

25715 

c.w.c. 

25762 

25785 

25807 

25823 

25843 

25850 

CARTER W. CLARKE 

Colonel, General Staff Corps 

Special Security Officer,MID. 

~ Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-06-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

-

-
I 

REF ID:A488554 

SPSIS 311.5 

(4 October 1944) lat Ind. SPSIS-3 

ASF. OCSigO, Washington 25, D. C., 6 October 1944. 

To: Colonel Carter W. Clarke. Deputy Chief, Military Intelligence Service, War Department, Washington 25, D. C. 

Copies requested are furnished herewith. 

Inolosure: 

For the Chief Signal Officer: 

w. Preston Corderman, 

Colonel, Signal Corps, Chief. Signal Security Branch. 

Messages requested in basic 

action. 

~.:if ~I 1·2\ 

. ~ ~· . 

-2-
<PAGE>


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 4
                                     TO THE
                                TIME WARNER INC.
                           DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



1.   Section 4.2(a) is amended by adding the following sentence before the last
     sentence thereof:

          On and after January 1, 2000, the available deemed Investment Funds
          shall include, on a deemed investment basis, all of the similarly
          named funds (both core funds and mutual funds in the mutual funds
          option) offered under the Time Warner Defined Contribution Plans
          Master Trust.

2.   Article IV is amended by adding the following section 4.8 at the end
     thereof:

          4.8 Investment of Account Balances Transferred from the Excess Profit
          Sharing Plan. The account balances which are to be transferred from
          the Excess Profit Sharing Plan to the Plan shall be deemed invested in
          the fund using the investment crediting rate based on the Capital
          Preservation Fund of the Time Warner Defined Contribution Plans Master
          Trust. Participants in the Plan who have such account balances
          transferred to the Plan will be permitted to make two investment
          changes (for their entire Plan account balances) in the calendar
          quarter of the transfer instead of one.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 13

- 00851

- CR

George GALVAN
, Appellant

v. The State of The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2012CR9427 Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding
Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 9, 2014

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

A f ter the trial court denied his motion to suppress, a ppellant pled no contest, pursuant to a
plea bargain , to aggravated robbery and was sentenced in accordance with the plea bargain.
Appellant’s court

- appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of
the record and demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes
the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S.
738 (1967). Appellant was informed of his right to review the record and of his right to file a pro
se brief. Appellant did not file a pro se brief.04

- 13

- 00851

- CR

After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without
merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment, and we GRANT appellate counsel’s

motion to withdraw. 1 Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no
pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice
Do not publish

1 No substitute counsel will be appointed. See In re Schulman , 252 S.W.3d 403, 408 n.22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). Should appellant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, appellant must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of ei ther this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with Texas Court of Criminal Appeals. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 68.3(a). Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 68.4.

- 2

-
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 21, 2001, accompanying the financial
statements included in the Annual Report of Ortec International, Inc. on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000. We hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements of
Ortec International Inc. on Forms S-3 (File No. 333-42850 effective August 23,
2000, File No. 333-46352, effective September 29, 2000, File No. 333-52019,
effective May 7, 1998 and File No. 333-80979, effective October 14, 1999) and on
Forms S-8 (File No. 333-47671, effective March 10, 1998 and File No. 333-80799,
effective June 16, 1999).


GRANT THORNTON LLP


New York, New York
March 28, 2001
# C_2015038EN.01002201.xml

| 4.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/22

---

Call for proposals 2015 — EAC/A04/2014 — Erasmus+ Programme: Change of deadline for the submission of applications for Jean Monnet actions

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 344 of 2 October 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 344 of 2 October 2014

(2015/C 38/08)

Point 5 ‘Deadline for the submission of applications’ has been amended as follows, as regards Jean Monnet actions:

‘Jean Monnet actions

| Chairs, Modules, Centres of Excellence, Support to Institutions and Associations, Networks, Projects | 26 March 2015’ |
| --- | --- |

Chairs, Modules, Centres of Excellence, Support to Institutions and Associations, Networks, Projects

26 March 2015’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HOMECOM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         332,377
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  595,099
<ALLOWANCES>                                   106,845
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               821,252
<PP&E>                                         448,050
<DEPRECIATION>                                  88,790
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,726,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,125,934
<BONDS>                                        102,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           192
<OTHER-SE>                                    (620,861)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,726,522
<SALES>                                        185,977
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,298,855
<CGS>                                          128,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  675,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,100,013
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               104,360
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              51,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (625,583)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (625,583)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (625,583)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.34)


</TABLE>
| Name                                             | State of Incorporation |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| PRI Medical Technologies, Inc                                        | Nevada                 |   |
| Medical Resources Management Financial, Inc.     | California             |   |
| Litho Venture 1, LLC                                       | Delaware               |   |
| Litho Venture 2, LLC                                       | Delaware               |   |
| Litho Venture 3, LLC                                  | Delaware               |   |
| Cryo Venture 2, LLC                                             | Delaware               |   |
| Cryo Venture 3, LLC                                   | Delaware               |   |
| Cryo Venture 6, LLC                                        | Delaware               |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                          14,880
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               520,537
<PP&E>                                      16,130,261
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,456,807
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,283,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,227,971
<BONDS>                                      1,755,000
<COMMON>                                       230,921
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,069,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,283,269
<SALES>                                          6,074
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,074
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,883,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             258,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,122,548)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,122,548)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,122,548)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13376-13377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05714]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreement Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of the filing of the following 
agreement under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may submit 
comments on the agreement to the Secretary, Federal Maritime 
Commission, Washington, DC 20573, within twelve days of the date this 
notice appears in the Federal Register. A copy of the agreement is 
available through the Commission's Web site (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b2c6c0d3d6d7d3dcd3decbc1dbc1f2d4dfd19cd5ddc4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aedadccfcacbcfc0cfc2d7ddc7ddeec8c3cd80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201227.
    Title: Pacific Ports Operational Improvements Agreement.
    Parties: Ocean Carrier Equipment Management Association, Inc.; West 
Coast MTO Agreement; Maersk Line A/S; APL Co. Pte Ltd.; American 
President Lines, Ltd.; CMA CGM S.A.; Cosco Container Lines Company 
Limited; Evergreen Line Joint Service Agreement FMC Agreement No. 
011982; Hamburg-Sud; Alianca Navegacao e Logistica Ltda.; Hanjin 
Shipping Co., Ltd.; Hapag-Lloyd AG; Hapag-Lloyd USA; Companhia Libra de 
Navegacao; Compania Libra de Navegacion Uruguay S.A.; Mitsui O.S.K. 
Lines, Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha Line; Kawasaki Kisen

[[Page 13377]]

Kaisha, Ltd.; APM Terminals Pacific, Ltd.; California United Terminals, 
Inc.; Eagle Marine Services, Ltd.; International Transportation 
Service, Inc.; Long Beach Container Terminal, Inc.; Seaside 
Transportation Service LLC; Trapac, Inc.; Total Terminals LLC; West 
Basin Container Terminal LLC; Yusen Terminals, Inc.; Pacific Maritime 
Services, L.L.C.; SSA Terminals, LLC; and SSA Terminal (Long Beach), 
LLC.
    Filing Party: Jeffrey F. Lawrence, Esq.; Cozen O'Connor; 1627 I 
Street NW.; Suite 1100; Washington, DC 20006.
    Synopsis: The Agreement would authorize the parties to discuss, 
exchange information, and reach agreement with respect to measures 
towards improving the efficiency of operations of West Coast port 
facilities, reducing congestion at such facilities, inspection, safety 
and efficient use of equipment, and related port operational matters. 
It would also authorize the parties to agree on rules, regulations, 
practices and terms and conditions relating to the foregoing matters.

    By Order of the Federal Maritime Commission.

    Dated: March 9, 2015.
Karen V. Gregory,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05714 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>