alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.8





 Exhibit 10.8 
  





 
 Contract ammendment 

Parties: 
  

	 	1.	 Allego B.V.., situated at Arnhem, Westvoortsedijk 73, 6872 AV, represented by Mr. M. Bonnet, CEO, herafter
referred to as Principal”; 


 en 
  

	 	2.	 Pharus Management Services B.V., situated at Breda, Wagemakerspark 94, 4818 TV, represented by A.H.T. Louwers,
Director, hereafter referred to as Contractor; 


 Jointly referred to as: “Parties”; 

Parties agree to ammend the existing contract between them signed on June 1, 2018 as follows: 

 

	 	1.	 The daily rate as of January 1, 2021 will be increased to 1.500 euro per working day per month



  

	 	2.	 The notice period for both parties will be changed to 6 months 



 

	 	3.	 Contractor will engage in a lease contract for a car and will invoice the cost on a monthly basis to Principal



 Arnhem January 1, 2021 
  

					
	Principal	  	Contractor	  	
	Allego B.V.	  	Pharus Management Services B.V.	  	
	 




  
	  	 




  
	  	
	M. Bonnet	  	A.H.T. Louwers
_. __ • - 1-

..... 

... -...,.. ... ·7· ( . 

' r 

r I 

- •·-., - -\ -

•• I 

~ "i • I -

.,. 

-r• -. • 

,, __ ~ 

' 

... _ 

I ... 

r-

. : 

I 

.. ..... • .. -_, 

-..... LJ. 

~ 

~- ' ~ - -

' I 

.. 

• 

-.... 

¥.-~ 

-lo , 

' 

~ .. - r· .. t -

--· -1--

- ' 

,_ 

• ... - r 

' . I 

I 

~- . ' 

... • 

t-

-. 

-t 

, ' _J __ ------t--+--4------------------

- ,.. -r-

.: t-- _1 

- ------r1 I 

I I ,. ·--; , -~­

I 

-"t" -

I 

I 

·-

t- -- t 

I 

.. -1 -t "l 

" - -r 

I 

·- ~ 

1"' ..J 

I I 

I 

-1- -l I 

I ' 1i--...,. ..... 

roved for Release b 

I -~ .. ,_ 

on 04-25-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 - .L -
, . • --i-- ~- --I 

l' 

: 

I __ \_, ..... t· "' I 

-(- I . I 

- '-- 1- 1-

i' 

I 

I 1- i - -1 - <--

-~ ' 

,.. - 1 ~. 

! 

:- or;' 

-~ 

c 

I 

l 

--+--+ 

- ,_..i.. -

i .. ~ .... --+ -

·- I 

~i ... _., .,__ 

' 

~ t 

' 

.. 

I ,.. -~ 

'' 

I 

- t 

. _) - .. ~ --I. 

~· - I 

I 

--

I 

I I • - +-

' J 

I 

I 

-, . .. 

·-

lo - --: 

--t--.,;-1 

- .. ---l-. -+ - r--- .J, - -1----- 1 I r 
. 

y. • 

a ,.a..U/ JU~~,~ 

,.J~ . 

' 

I ~ 

I 

.. 

I 

. 

~ 

. . 

-·~~.--~~~ ....... . 

( .;;-,p) ~ .?1 

.. 

/f ,, ,, fr ,. , 

• 

• ~-·---. 

• ' I •= 

~H~·· r~_efl.-t ~'4Z . . i . 

;· . ~ 

• • I 

i 

I 

-

• I • ,.,. • • : • • . .·-" 

' 

I • I •. I • • •· ,.. 

' . . .. . ,,.. . . . -· . ·- . -..... • , •• - ; • • •I -·- -- i 

r t I i I f I ; • I I I 

./. 

.· \. 

. I 

. i I I I . • .. 

f /'I I 

I • 

.. . 
REF ID:A65431 

LINEAR TRANSFORMATION is 8Irf rigid transformation in space which can be 

represented by the successive performance of pure translations and pure 

rotations. 

Thereoms # 1 .. Every linear transformation can be represented by a matr~. 

# 2 .. Every matrir represents a linear transformation. 

# J .. It the determillant of a matrix is different from ~ero, tie 

transformation is non-singular and has an inverse. The 

matrix of the inverse transformation is the adjoiat of 

the original matrix with every element divided by the 

value of the determinant. 

Cryptographical Application: 

Represent plain text in units of fixed length as a series of vectors. ( A 

vector is any ordered set of numbers of fixed length). Dailey Key 

consists of a series of substitutions which will transform the pia1n tex1i; 

into a Tector and a non-singular matrix having as many rows and columns 

as the vector has elements. Each vector in turn is multiplied on the right 

by the matrix and the result is always a Tectoxr. Another series of 

substitutions is provided to change the resulting vector to cipher text. 

Deciphering is accomplished in the same way using the inverse substitutjon 

and inverse matrix. 

Note 1. 

2. 

A self reciprocal matrix is its own inverse. 

Instead or using a single matrix, a matrix polynominal can be used. 

~ter H. Hill 1 American Mathematical Monthly for(sept. ~!' 1929 and 1930) 

Dr. H. C~paigne
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Trio 90 LLC and Mautner-Glick Corporation, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant, <br><br>against<br><br>Rosa Williamson, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Maria Milin, J.), dated February 8, 2016, which denied its motion for entry of a possessory judgment and warrant of eviction based upon tenant's failure to comply with a so ordered stipulation settling a holdover summary proceeding.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Maria Milin, J.), dated February 8, 2016, modified to the extent of remanding the matter for a hearing consistent herewith; as modified, order affirmed, without costs.</p><p>In a so-ordered stipulation settling the underlying nuisance holdover proceeding, tenant agreed, inter alia, to refrain from permitting any "excessive noise such that it is a nuisance" during a specified probationary period. The stipulation also provided that in the event of a breach, landlord may restore the matter to the calendar and, if a "breach is proven at a hearing," landlord is entitled to a judgment of possession and warrant of eviction.</p><p>Upon landlord's timely motion to restore the matter, based on an affidavit of tenant's downstairs neighbor alleging a continuation of the excessive noise condition, Civil Court should have set the matter down for a hearing pursuant to the terms of the stipulation. "Strict enforcement of the parties' stipulation ... is warranted based upon the principle that the parties to a civil dispute are free to chart their own litigation course" (<i>Mill Rock Plaza Assoc. v Lively</i>, 224 AD2d 301 [1996]). Although the affidavit of the downstairs neighbor also contained some questionable allegations, the matter may not be summarily resolved without a hearing (<i>see Pearl v 305 E. 92nd St. Corp.</i>, 175 AD2d 735 [1991]; <i>Consolidated Rail Corp. v Industrial Scrap Processing Corp</i>., 97 AD2d 532 [1983])</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: November 16, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**CERTIFICATIONS                                     Exhibit 31.5**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jonathan S. Huberman

Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, April 2, 2015, 1:00 p.m. to April 2, 2015, 2:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on March 6, 2015, 80 FR 12185.                

The meeting has been cancelled due to the reassignment of applications.

Dated: March 13, 2015.

Anna Snouffer,

Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-06274 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**Exhibit 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION – Chief Financial Officer**

I, Steve Filton, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Universal Health Services, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared; 

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controls over financialreporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples; 

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation; and 

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 7, 2009
Exhibit 10.24

Summary of Iomega 2005 Incentive Bonus Plan ("IBP") for Executive Officers

2005 IBPProgram

Plan Structure:- 100% of bonus based onannual corporate metrics, which metrics are based on 2005 operating earnings  Slopes for calculations      - First payout is 80% of target bonus for 80% metricachievement  Payouts increase in a linear manner until 110% of target bonuspayout for 110% metric achievementThe maximum payout is 200% of targetbonus payout for 140% of metric achievement 
AdministrativeDetails
  Individual participant targets (as a percent of base salary) remain unchanged from established levels.
-  Payout calculations will occur upon the official close of the fiscal year,with any payments occurring in         early February.    Operating earnings calculations will exclude extraordinary events, as determined by the sole discretion of         the Compensation Committee.    In the case of the "circular" impact of a bonus payout (i.e., achieve operating earnings targets triggering         a payout under the plan, but paying bonus causes under achievement) bonus will be paid if the other Plan         metrics are met.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                     CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER & CONTROLLER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Hilda Kwena, Treasurer & Controller of Comtex News Network, Inc. (the "Company")
certifies in her capacity as an officer of the Company that she has reviewed the
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for period ended December 31, 2005 and that
to the best of her knowledge:

        1.      the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections
                13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        2.      the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
                material respects, the financial condition and results of
                operations of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or it staff upon request.


February 14, 2006                     /s/ Hilda Kwena
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      Hilda Kwena
                                      Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
                                      (Treasurer & Controller)
-o ....... .,, 

I 

~' 

arl!"lllC"D ... -~ urr l!"nD -ADDDl'lll 

--. 

~!,,£ JS.A s ROI' ALS, MEMO RO G SLIP I .. _ .. _ .. --. __ , ......... _ ...... CONCURRENCES. OR SI/Ill~ 'IONS 

I NAME OR TITLE INITIALS CIRCULATE 

0RGANIZAT10N AND ~ Wenger DATE COORDINATION 

2 m'\.eo:tJ FILE 

- INFORMATION 

x 

3 NECesARY 

ACTION 

JC 

NOTE AND RETURN 

-- 4 SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

REMARKS 

This is a report on the Athenaeum case which 

wasprepared for you some time ago by AFSA-02. It 

formed part ot the folder on that case which you 

turned over to Mr. Friedman before your trip to the 

Far East. Attached to the report are copies ot 

letters Tilhich originally formed part of the report, 

and which 02 asked your signature upon. They have· 

been amended only in so far as the date is concerned. 

U the letters are sent, I believo that Mr. 

' Foley would be happy to bo inf'ormed, and I shall be 

glai to do so, if you desire. Mr. Friedman asked 

that copies ot the report be placed in his ·file on 

this case. Therefore if' you will return the or-t...; ..... i 

to 1119, I shall have photostatic copies made and rctw n 

the original. promptly. 

Mary c. Lane 

For Mr. Friedman Captain, WAC 

~eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-29-2014 

3526 

pursuant to E.O.l 

I ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 

_ oar [OP 3ECRElJ I TELEPHONE 

60493 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Form 891i, 1 Apr 48, and AFBQ I FEB 110 Form 12, 10 Nov 47, which ma:v be ased. ~ GPO : 11&1 - 0 111514
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

November 22, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00876-CV

IN THE MATTER OF J.L.U

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 & Probate Court

Brazoria County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. JV20850

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a September 29, 2016 order of a juvenile court 

waiving jurisdiction and transferring appellant to criminal district court. On

November 9, 2016, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices McCally and Brown.
PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

NSJ\. OPJi:RJ\.TIOPJG OR'D~l 

NUMBER 30 L ( Chnnr;c. 1~) 

TTA'l'IONJ\L 31!:CURITY AGll:I'lCY 

U'1Ah1n(;t.ou 25, 1J. C. , 3 May- 1955 

1. :Jee liio11 V, l ·m·a~aph ~ • b . :. :J s cha111Jed t.o rand as .Coll.owe : 

"b. 1\11 tachnical rcport..s o.nd. tcchnicol. data (rteek.ty Notes, 

Tecbnica.l Snprort r..et.tc:ra, etc.) on lih_._ ___________ ___, 

problem l-ri.lJ be -publj she(! d:l.ractly ·b;y US/\Ji';1S. Technical reports A.1ld. 

technico.l. data on all other Russi.an Air CQfl11T probJ.ems wilt be passed 

to NBA i'or revi.cw, publicot1.on, n.nd c1lslirJ.bubio11." 

2. Add the .Collowiita to Append i.K B, para.graph 2. a: 

"(;) 111sA to inmchQi·arri.c.'' 

3. Insert the! i'ollcnrine ite1n (~1) i11 Appendix B, pa.re.gro.ph 2.b., 

alld renumber the cxistinc; ltems (5), (6), end (7) as (6), (7), o.nd (8) 

" ( 5) NSA to supply cm."ds to AFSCC wcekJ.y. " 

~ • Del C!t.e item ( 1) of po.ra 6J:'a.:rih 2 • c. , and roimmber the remaining 

items accordingly. 

BY ca MAND OF LIEt1.1.Dl\1'1T GF.J.J'.l!nAL CAilI~: 

OFFICIAI.: 

"-.. --("( '. /I 

//; / _ e, t-e.{.LIA. 4_ 

M. 1r. CARDTNJ\L 

Major Wl\.C 

ftct~ Asst AdJ Gen 

DILl'lRD3UTIOJ'T 

Spccle.l 

ALFRP.D n. l·mRCY 

Colonel, US tirrn..v Dcpu~y Director 

P1·0Cluction 

''Of 3i;.:cttE'f ee1merJ IM ffifft 55-o883 

Cot'Y h or. J.2P COPIES 

P.'\f";[!: --y-- or ---y-- P.1Vlli.:S 

SECRET PIVOT 

eclassifi ed and a ro d for rel ea e b SA on 11-13-2013 ursuant to E .0. 13 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,430,130
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  419,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,859,229
<PP&E>                                       2,423,455
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,007,266)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,275,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          221,307
<BONDS>                                        128,841
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,747
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,894,523
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,275,418
<SALES>                                        283,284
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               351,793
<CGS>                                          138,932
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  246,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               289,037
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (183,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    69,794
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (113,873)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opinion filed November 22, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00860-CR

IN RE LESLIE RAY FOSTER, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

10th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16-CR-1600

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 31, 2016, relator Leslie Ray Foster filed a pro se petition for 

writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221 (West 2004); 

see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the 

Honorable Kerry Neves, presiding judge of the 10th District Court of Galveston 
2

County to rule on his pro se application for writ of habeas corpus dated July 18, 

2016.

Relator states in his petition that he was arrested for the offense of 

organized criminal activity and that an attorney has been assigned to represent him. 

A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. Robinson v. State,

240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 

498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means 

that a relator’s pro se mandamus petition should be treated as presenting nothing 

for this court’s review. See Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806 (Tex. App.–Houston 

[1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding); In re Bogus, 14-16-00129-CR, 2016 WL 

1165807, at *1 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Mar. 24, 2016, orig. proceeding)

(per curiam) (mem. op.) (denying pro se petition for writ of mandamus because 

relator is represented by counsel). Because relator is represented by counsel, 

relator’s pro se petition presents nothing for review.

Additionally, as the party seeking relief, relator has the burden of providing 

this court with a sufficient record to establish his right to mandamus relief. See 

Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 837 (Tex. 1992); Tex. R. App. P. 52.7(a)(1) 

(relator must file with petition “a certified or sworn copy of every document that is 

material to the relator's claim for relief and that was filed in any underlying 

proceeding”). To be entitled to relief, the record must show that the habeas 

application was filed and brought to the attention of the trial court. See In re 

Foster, 14-16-00797-CR, 2016 WL 6134438, at *1, __ S.W.3d __ (Tex. App.—
3

Houston [14th Dist.] Oct. 20, 2016, orig. proceeding). The record provided by 

relator does not meet these requirements.

For these reasons, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Relator also has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Because this 

court does not charge inmates fees or costs, we deny the motion as moot.

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Boyce and Christopher.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
(logo)NORWEST MORTGAGE                                 Norwest Mortgage, Inc.
                                                       Home Campus
                                                       Des Moines, IA 50328
                                                       515/221-7300







                              Management Assertion

As of and for the period ended December 31, 1996,  Norwest  Mortgage Banking has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  Uniform  Single  Attestation
Program for Mortgage Bankers.  As of and for this same period,  Norwest Mortgage
Banking  had in effect a fidelity  bond and errors and  emissions  policy in the
amount of $20 Million.


/s/Mark Oman                                               January 15, 1997
Mark Oman, President and CEO                                Date


/s/Alta Jones                                              January 15, 1997
Alta Jones, Senior Vice President & CFO                     Date


/s/Cara Heiden                                             January 15, 1997
Cara Heiden, Executive Vice President, Loan Admin           Date



NMFL #0820H 5/96