alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Employment Agreement  with Randall Mehrberg, dated June 8, 2011



 Exhibit 10.2 

 

					
	Margaret M. Pego	  		  	Human Resources
	 Senior Vice President-Human Resources
 and Chief Human Resources Officer
	  		  	 80 Park Plaza, T4, Newark, NJ 07102
 tel: 973-430-7243 fax: 973-643-6063

		  		  	email: Margaret.Pego@pseg.com

 



 
 June 8, 2011 
 Mr. Randall E. Mehrberg 
  

			
	RE:	  	CHANGE TO LIMITED PLAN BENEFIT

 Dear Randy: 
 This letter addresses the change to the Supplemental Executive Retirement Income for Non-Represented Employees (“SERP”) as a result of the changes in the benefit formula to the Pension Plan for
Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated (the “Pension Plan”). 
 Your June 30, 2008 employment offer letter
provides that your Limited Plan Benefit is a percentage of your final average earnings, less the aggregate value of certain other benefits. Although you are not Pension Plan participant, the 5-year final average earnings calculation currently used
in the Limited Plan Benefit formula under the SERP is the same as that used in the Pension Plan formula. Effective January 1, 2012, the formula under the Pension Plan for MAST employees is changing from a 5-year final average earnings
calculation to a 7-year final average earnings calculation. For consistency with the current plan design of the Pension Plan and the SERP, the Company decided to also change the formula for Limited Plan Benefits to a 7-year final average earnings
calculation. 
 As such, it is requested that you consent to the following as a modification to your Limited Plan Benefit:

 Effective January 1, 2012, your Limited Plan Benefit will be equal to (a) amount calculated as of December 31,
2011 using 5-year final average earnings, plus (b) amount calculated after December 31, 2011 using 7-year final average earnings. 








			
	R.E. Mehrberg	  	6/8/11

 All other components of your Limited Plan Benefit will be calculated in accordance with the terms of the
SERP, as amended from time to time, including but not limited to the application of the 30 points in the Limited Plan Benefit formula. The 30 points will be prorated based on the number of your actual years of credited service that you have as of
December 31, 2011 and that you accrue during the period beginning on January 1, 2012 and ending on your termination date. 
 If you are in agreement with this modification, please confirm below and return to me. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	/s/ Margaret M. Pego
	
	Margaret M. Pego
	 Senior Vice President – Human Resources
 and Chief Human Resources Officer



 Agreed to on this     15     day of June 2011 

 

	
	 /s/ Randall E. Mehrberg

	Randall E. Mehrberg


  
 2
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS 

ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-

Q

 for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip Forte, Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as 

adopted pursuant to

 § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and 

results

 of operations of the Company.   Date: August 12, 2009   /s/Philip FortePhilip ForteCorporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer
REF ID:A44642 

'l'Os Com••.._ . Utd.W st.ate. AU lbrce IMwiti' 8er"fica 

am a~.~ 

N 4847 

9 DEC i~60 

l. la vie ot the _,..tect ~-of tDe f.IW\ JiattanaJ. 

81eudt7 A111•v ~. Co.l.cmtl. baDk A. aoaen, tfSQ\ upon 

o~aa 

that. en otn.eer 

st h1• 

in 

186. 

gnde 

tcaar 

of 

or 

Coloml 

4ut7 lA 

(o6) 

JUne 

la 

1961, 

wt•W 

it te 

tar~ 

~ 

.. .. M•n~. 

2. ,_ ~ l'lGld..natd. mwrt :PC•••• • bl'Olld. -~ in 

.u phuea of e~ vith ~ at MaJor Casand er 

~ le'f'el.. I't is ~ tha't a contact replaeemeo.t f1l 

Colona\ Boger9 U •eenar,r to 1naUN the aceeaf'ul t1'1inater of 

ta. rupomd.biltt.t•. 

3.. stm>u llCtd.nattomJ have been ~ ot 011.e:r, AM m4 

.iead, lil'V81 Secul"ity Group. 

cc: DIR ~---« AG 

Reading File 

PERS 

M/R: Self-explanatory. 

i... a.. J'iOS'i 

Vice· Adld.nl, t1SB 

Df.ftetor· 

...)~ II · -'I ~4 -~ f. ~t ,4/-S A) 

f" ~ .q K''/ ..r ro 11-1. ""4vJ~ jr:c.,, 

~Ji.-~ Maurice H. Klein, PERS, 3755, 8 Dec So, mgk 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 10-25-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
i 

~ , 

I 

I 

I 

r 

REF ID:A56943 

, ___ .... - .... ..- - .. 

! -

r ': r ~...; ,- ' ___ _, ,.- : ..... --- -:. ~---:- .. 

Extracted From 

G.C. and c.s. Japanese Diplomatic Section History 

Copy No. 5 

History of Japanese Diploma.tic 

B ( 'PURPl.E' } Ma.chine 

Copy No. 5 

APPENDIX N 

LIAISON WITH AMERICA 

From the time (February 1941} that the U.S. 

authorities concerned provided us with our first 

B-ma.chine, ue enjoyed the fullest possible uorking 

liaison with them: first with the Navy Department, 

and later with SSA.> War De-partment (now ASA}. Hitherto 

unknown sequences were sent from us to them, or from the 

to us, immediately upon recovery, and settings when 

obtained for the first time were similarly made available. 

Over B-machine traffic, too, there was full and complete 

interchange. If the invaluable pa.rt played by the 

Americans has been little stressed in the latter pa.rt 

of this history, this is only because it was primarily 

designed to show by what methods the Japanese Diploma.tic 

Section of GC & CS attempted to cope with the va.rious 

cryptographic problems connected with the exploitation 

of the B-ma.chine. La.eking such close co-operation 

with the U.S., our work would have been many times harder: 

and we incline to believe that the reverse is also true. 

, __ :;.- .. -..,. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-21-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
P 0 BOX 43$ 

Dear General Chnnchill: 

REF ID:A414.60 

GEORGE f'"ABVAN 

CHICAGO 

Jlrarch 

-

I 

l 

I 

/ 

I 

27,1920. 

Thank you very much for your letter of the 24th. 

After writing you last, Colonel Mauborgne ca.me 

into the office and his conversation was something that I could not comprehend. He pulled out his note book and read me three or four pages of 

what he had written and desired me to acquiesce and aclmowledge that the.t 

was the opinion of Riverb~nk in regard to some proposed modifications he 

proposed to ma.ke. I told him I did not see what he wns trying to get at. 

5 

In the first place, we v;ould not use that language and in the second place, 

in order to have no misunderstanding, I would dictate a letter there and then, 

~op~ of which I attach and the.t if, in his report, he embodied anything else, 

he would have to do it on his own hook. 

There appeared to be wheels within wheels. That 

particular system has been modified no less than three or four times and 

nonJ of those modifications have taken into consideration the fundamental 

principles of the workings of the me.chine ~hich can be reduced to me.thematics. 

This is often a he.rd, long arduous task. 

Under pressure, Colonel W~ubor~ne forced an opinion from me that this last,proposed modification was impractical on the face 

of it. His answer was that I had no right to take that position and that it 

was practical and I told him the.t the letter I had just dictated in his presence was otir reply. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A414ilf>O ...... 

There are some other matters that I would like to talk to you 

about when next we meet. I shall probably be in Washington sometime, 

about the 23rd of next month. 

Please consider this letter in strict confidence and destroy it. 

General M. Churchill, 

Woodvrard Apartment, 

2301 Connecticu Ave., 

Washington, D. C. 

Sincerely yours,
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 21, 2016

No. 04-16-00624-CR

IN RE Juan ENRIQUEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

On September 28, 2016, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered relator’s petition and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought.

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The 

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on November 21, 2016.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 3862, styled The State of Texas v. Juan Enriquez, pending in the 81st 

Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas, the Honorable Donna S. Rayes, presiding.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2014

d0721 

# Order

Clerk July 29, 2014

148244

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148244

COA: 316807

Marquette CC: 12

- 050513

- FH

USAMAH CARSWELL,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 30, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of

People v Lockridge (Docket No. 149073) is pending on appeal before this Court and that

the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present application for leave to

appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE pending the decision in

that case.
Exhibit 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip Forte, Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 12, 2009  /s/Philip FortePhilip Forte
Corporate Controller and Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 12

                        Fleming Companies, Inc.
        Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges


                                                     28 Weeks Ended
                                                July 10,        July 11,
(In thousands of dollars)                          1999            1998

Earnings:
  Pretax income (loss)                        $(31,159)          $ 55,065
  Fixed charges, net                           106,661            106,609
                                              --------           --------
      Total earnings                          $ 75,502           $161,674

Fixed charges:
  Interest expense                            $ 90,253           $ 87,063
  Portion of rental charges
    deemed to be interest                       16,163             19,316
  Capitalized interest                             178                  -
                                              --------           --------
      Total fixed charges                     $106,594           $106,379
                                              --------           --------
Deficiency                                     $31,092
                                              ========
Ratio of earnings
   to fixed charges                                .71               1.52
                                              ========           ========

"Earnings" consists of income before income taxes and fixed charges
excluding capitalized interest.  Capitalized interest amortized during
the respective periods is added back to earnings.

"Fixed charges, net" consists of interest expense, an estimated amount
of rental expense which is deemed to be representative of the interest
factor and amortization of capitalized interest.

The pro forma ratio of earnings to fixed charges is omitted as it is not
applicable.

Under the company's long-term debt agreements, "earnings" and "fixed
charges" are defined differently and amounts and ratios differ
accordingly.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00719-CV

IN RE Muriel GILFORD

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

ORDER

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

On November 1, 2016, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has 

considered the petition and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief sought. 

Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The 

court’s opinion will issue at a later date.

It is so ORDERED on November 17, 2016.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk

 

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2015-PA-02672, styled In the Interest of M.I.G., a Child, pending in the 

166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Karen H. Pozza presiding.
**Exhibit 10.17**

 

Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. 

Board of Directors 

2004 - 2005 Board Term Compensation 

 

Chairman 

 

Quarterly Fee of $3,000 

 

In-person per meeting fee of $1,100 per meeting 

 

Telephone per meeting fee of $550 per meeting 

 

2,000 shares per year (vest at end of board term)

 

Other Non-Management Directors

 

Quarterly Fee of $2,500 

 

In-person per meeting fee of $800 per meeting 

 

Telephone per meeting fee of $400 per meeting 

 

2,000 shares per year (vest at end of board term)

 

Committee Chairmen 

 

Quarterly Fee of $2,500 

 

In-person per meeting fee of $2,000 per meeting 

 

Telephone per meeting fee of $1,000 per meeting

 

Other Committee Members 

 

In-person per meeting fee of $1,000 per meeting 

 

Telephone per meeting fee of $500 per meeting
Opinion issued October 13, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-16-00612-CR

———————————

IN RE KEVIN DEMOND SCOTT, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Kevin Demond Scott seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial court to consider 

and rule on a motion for diligent participation credit.1 See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN.

art. 42.12, §15(h) (West Supp. 2016). 

We deny the petition. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Keyes, and Brown.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. Kevin Scott, cause number 1502773, pending 

in the 228th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Frank C. Price, sitting 

for the Honorable Marc Carter, 228th District Court.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-263-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ENACTED UNDER
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI, Inc.  (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Domenic N.
Golato, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
state and certify under oath, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION] 1350, as
enacted under [SECTION] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of
            operations of the Company as of June 30, 2002 (the end of the
            period covered by the Report).


                                       /s/ Domenic N. Golato
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Domenic N. Golato
                                       Senior Vice President & Chief
                                       Financial Officer


<PAGE>  1
7(fM~ .th". 'ftlamllalll -..... 

~tll Mllnage:r 

lleot.lvntc• D1Tl91on 

REF ID:A67767 

Oemral. llectr.Lc Co:nr-Cl1 

l'/'l'aCwte, h'lf 'foft 

DearXr .. ~ 

TM l•ti.onal SeourJ.:t.7 Aa-.no7, .lbl'ltet"l1 lma4n u Uae .l.1"11ed Porce:t 

a.c\n"lt:- Apnc7, 1• ...S.ov.s to 'be atil• tc call ~ ..S.ncnt 11'11.entiets 

mcll •• Jt>tir8elf tot part-time ffnic•• or tor apMJ.•l 4'Qnsl.lltaU.on in 

Cl7Pto&rapb;r and ooar.ad.cat.io.!Ulf naeareb, a tield a:trer.el7 iapol'1iant 

1u the nJ t.lonal de.fenso. l •swre JOU. that ,ou WOllld be called upon 

tcr •uch 1Wt1.ces or con-.~tation onl7 on. pl't)bl.e1t.• of a ••tb• Y1 kl 

naturo. 

There U"G i.broa 'tf1pea Of probl•s in w1d.ch JOU lllJ.1' bta 11\t.enated. 

the' Ageno1 apon~n • •UllOIMtr SlfAPosi• 111 •OD.them CalJ.fomia1 at. which. 

•thomUou FO\lil•• b•elc to our work aro d11c•1ed. tao ot these 

p¥ttbl.etrJit aoncem the •f\fllJ.caUon or kno1m itusul.t.s1 b\lt.. ti. 1nater part. 

ot 'Ibo topio• tn'ftal.Ye now :reHarcb. SO. of \he •i*Clal 11el.da .011t. 

tNq-.-nt.17 inYolvQd aro a11.ri:c \heoi-1, ttat.!.isU.01, ca11.bina.tor1al. ana.1711•1 

an4 log1o. 

The Acmc1 al eo •plo1• a number or s->Pl• u aossnl tant.1 who an 

clll•tl upon tor •dvlce on unus.al p:n>ble1u1 which ar1H flt>• t.!.119 t1' "1•• 

Again the pro'bl.'1nl.s •Wl. VDl'k on tot.h the &pJU.ied am the nsearch lnial•· 

CV-.raritl7 than 1• being ••tabliabsd tor th•,,,.,_,,., an .id1'1ff01"f 

a:roup vb!oh, it. 1• oontmiplated 11111 metJ\ at. Z"e&ul.U' uterYal• to deal 

'Id.th • n:rtety or •e1tmt.i!io w'3eot~ ~nent. "° th• won of fh• .1&•n07. 

Ii.nee th• Apn07t • vo:rk 18 b1gh17 olu•tfied_, theft a.re aennn pro• ctldurea n1ces•a?"¥ ill eonneotton vtt.h obWntna acce91 to th• lR>ft or with 

tu proeu>.-&111ent ot personnel, u: 70u _.. :l11t.erested in Utti•tl.~ u 1n ..,_ or o\U" probletr01 it. 1• r•rwa,,t.od tmt 10u ft.ll oat the inclosett f'ona1. 

CD the Per30nat ff1 stor1 St&Mtll!ent J>l,eut t1U in "9r.T blank,. nen it \be 

o.ol1 po••1bl• ~ 1• •Iuppl.1oable.• ThR r1ns•rplin\ cud OW.l • coapltlted at aft7 polic• •\a.ti.on,. ••n1oe rccl"ui. Una center or cbdler aot1• .... i"t,J". I nlliw that. t.bie will be an ont'roua b11t. unavoiA•bl• incormmi~noe, cr.f I otter JOU rq apolo17 tor it. 

I •u."t. •pha!i•• th•t no oolllld.U.nt ., to 10ur .m.oe• ia 1nteni1ed 

or can be aad• ai. W.e t.1.u. When 1')'\l have COJKP1•1.ed tho rot'lu1 pl.e•e• 

ntam Ul.em "1 me, m.t I aball 1Jd.t1ate Uud.r px'OC4tla111it bore. I\ aq 

k pol9s1bl• then t.o d1.ac~• 1hts ut.t.er ill IN&M!' detail. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-12-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

------ -

..................... ___________ ~--=-~ 
REF ID :A67767 .. 

.tcatn I vi.ab to flPO].o&l .. tor iin>iablina 1011 me! \o •••.lre JOiJ. tnat 

70u.r uaietance em blr a n.i ecnt.l"iwUon tu th• national clelmee. 

I Inolr11 

l.. PBS~ DD 398 

w1 t.h •Upplemcnt.IJ .. I. riD&•rpl'.ln1t cant .. 

COi AG 

c/s 

OOHS 

M/R• Selt-u:p1ana tor;y. 

s.t.nctral1', 

w. 1. P'riedman/lio493/16 Dec S2
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



              CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form
10-K) of Discount Auto Parts, Inc. of our report dated July 6, 1998, included
in the 1998 Annual Report to stockholders of Discount Auto Parts, Inc.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-51244) pertaining to the Discount Auto Parts, Inc.
1992 Team Members Stock Purchase Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8
No 33-55512) pertaining to the Discount Auto Parts, Inc. 1992 Stock Option
Plan, in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-84058) pertaining to the
Discount Auto Parts, Inc. Non Employee Director Plan, and in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-96326) pertaining to the Discount Auto Parts, Inc.
1995 Stock Option Plan of our report dated August 8, 1997, with respect to the
financial statements incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Discount Auto Parts, Inc.



                                           Ernst & Young LLP

Tampa, Florida
August 21, 1998
Exhibit 10.1


 


 


 






    	 	1	 



     


    

 


 






    	 	2	 



     


    

 






    	 	3	 



     


    

 


 






    	 	4	 



     


    

 


 






    	 	5	 



     


    

 


 






    	 	6
P0-53 

(7-2H6) 

REF ID:A362463. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

WASHINGTON 

Harry M. SaragO"V1tz and 

Lawrence Glassman, ~ Ch.iet Signal Officer, 

LegA.l D1..-1a1on, .iar Dept., 

i\'ashine,ton, .u. c. 

Applicant W1lli8.ll. F. FriedmaD 

Serial No. 4 7Sl 9 J 

Filed ---------------- J;:aroh 6 1 1943 

16 July 1947 

For -------------------- ~y-steir.:. For I:noiphering Faoaillile 

liiv. 16 

In this case your power or attorney has been accepted. 

Respectfully, 

Commissioner. 

Revoking power of attorney 

to 

u. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTIN•. OfTICl ltl--·1,;160· 2 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
P0'·53 

(i-2.H6) 

REF ID:A36246. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

WASHINGTON 

Applicant William F. l"r1e4an 

Serial No. 47819) 

Filed ---------------· uarola 6 • 1943 

16 Julf 1947 

For -------------------- Spt• For Enolpber!Dg J'aoallllle 

D1Te 16 

In this case your power of attorney has been a:l~K. revoked. 

Respectfully, 

Revoking power of attorney 

to 

William D. H.rill, ~ Chie~ Signal Ottioer. 

War Department, Pentagon Bld ., Waahington, D.c. 

Commissioner. 

U, S. GOV!:RNh'!!:NT PRINTIN1 ; OF',,CF.: 16-·l,'HIJ0-2