alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 95-7284

VADEN LEE WILLIAMS,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.

John A. MacKenzie, Senior District Judge.

(CR-91-70-N, CA-95-401-2)

Argued: June 3, 1996

Decided: August 29, 1996

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

ARGUED: Bruce Charles Bishop, Third Year Law Student, Russell S. Post, Third Year Law Student, Appellate Litigation Clinic,

UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Kent Pendleton Porter, Assistant United States

Attorney, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: Neal L. Walters, Appellate Litigation Clinic, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA LAW SCHOOL,

Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States
Attorney, Mark A. Exley, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk,

Virginia, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The defendant, Vaden Lee Williams, appeals the district court's

denial of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. That court held that

civil forfeiture of an instrumentality of criminal activity is not punishment for purposes of the double jeopardy clause.

Following briefing and oral argument on June 3, 1996, before this

court, the Supreme Court decided that civil in rem forfeiture is not

punishment for purposes of the double jeopardy clause. United States

v. Ursery, 65 U.S.L.W. 4565 (U.S. June 24, 1996). The parties have

submitted to us memoranda on the effect of Ursery, and counsel for

Williams agrees that the Supreme Court's Ursery decision controls

this aspect of the case.

We have not found any error, however claimed, in the decision of

the district court.

The judgment of the district court denying the defendant's petition

under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is accordingly

AFFIRMED.

 2
# EPA-Approved Washington SDWA §1422 Underground Injection Control Program Statutes and Regulations for Well Classes I, II, III, IV, and V

January 2014

# Table of Contents
I. Revised Code ofWashington Sections 90.48.010-90.48.906, Water Pollution Control (February 3, 2006) II . Revised Code ofWashington Section 43.21A.445 , Departments authorized to participate in and administer federal Safe Drinking Water Act - Agreements with other departments (February 3, 2006) III. Washington Administrative Code Sections 173-218-010 - 173- 218- 130, Underground Injection Control Program (June 19, 2008) IV. Washington Administrative Code Sections 344-12-001 - 344- 12-295, Oil and Gas Conservation Committ ee, General Rules (June 29, 1988) V. Washington Administrative Code Sections 173-160-010- 173- 160-990, Minimum Standards for Construction and Maintenance ofWells (December 19, 2008)
Exhibit 32.2    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Justine Kostka, Assistant Controller of the Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: May 20, 2009


| |                                                 
| | ------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Justine Kostka                              
| | Justine KostkaActing Principal Financial Officer
# EXHIBIT 32.3

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 3, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Werner T. Heid, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Werner T. Heid
Werner T. Heid
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 12, 2005

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that Iomega Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 15593]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06632]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12635-002; Project No. 12152-000]


Moriah Hydro Corporation; Notice of Pre-Filing Activities in 
Another Docket

    Take notice that some pre-filing activities related to the 
preparation of the license application for the Mineville Energy Storage 
Project (P-12635-002) were undertaken in docket number P-12152-000. 
Documents pertaining to that proceeding are available in the 
Commission's eLibrary under docket number P-12152.
    For further information, please contact John Mudre at (202) 502-
8902.

     Dated: March 17, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06632 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          15,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,883
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          735,428
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,250
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,496,960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,248,755
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              (162,744)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (152,644)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (152,644)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (152,644)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Peachtree FiberOptics, Inc. uses the liquidation basis of accounting.
</FN>


</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2048 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count a period of receipt 

of outpatient observation services in a hospital toward satisfying the 

3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of skilled nursing facility services under Medicare. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2021 

Mr. BROWN (for himself, Ms. COLLINS, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, and Mrs. CAPITO) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to count 

a period of receipt of outpatient observation services 

in a hospital toward satisfying the 3-day inpatient hospital requirement for coverage of skilled nursing facility 

services under Medicare. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Improving Access to 

5 Medicare Coverage Act of 2021’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2048 IS

1 SEC. 2. COUNTING A PERIOD OF RECEIPT OF OUTPATIENT 

2 OBSERVATION SERVICES IN A HOSPITAL TO3 WARD THE 3-DAY INPATIENT HOSPITAL RE4 QUIREMENT FOR COVERAGE OF SKILLED 

5 NURSING FACILITY SERVICES UNDER MEDI6 CARE. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1861(i) of the Social Se8 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(i)) is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following: ‘‘For purposes of this subsection, 

10 an individual receiving outpatient observation services 

11 shall be deemed to be an inpatient during such period, 

12 and the date such individual ceases receiving such services 

13 shall be deemed the hospital discharge date (unless such 

14 individual is admitted as a hospital inpatient at the end 

15 of such period).’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

17 subsection (a) shall apply to receipt of outpatient observa18 tion services beginning on or after January 1, 2021, but 

19 applies to a period of post-hospital extended care services 

20 that was completed before the date of the enactment of 

21 this Act only if an administrative appeal is or has been 

22 made with respect to such services not later than 90 days 

23 after the date of the enactment of this Act. Notwith24 standing any other provision of law, the Secretary of 

25 Health and Human Services may implement such amendVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:09 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2048.IS S2048

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2048 IS

1 ment through an interim final regulation, program in2 struction, or otherwise. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
SI 0-100413-019 

April 8, 2010 

cs 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Departraenl of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines'iKsential Air Service at Adak, Alaska, 

Docket DOT-OST-2000-8556 \ / 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines (or "Alaska") to continue to 

provide essential air service to the community of Adak, Alaska. 

Alaska's jet service is critically important to the economic well being of the community: As a major 

Alaskan fishing company we depend on the the Alaska Airline 737 size aircraft which provides 

enough seats/space to get crew and supplies in and out of Adak in an expeditious and somewhat 

economical manner. Additionally, if the change in service would cause Adak to cease to exist as a 

community we would loose the housing and emergency medical services that this remote location 

provides. All of these things of course affect the income producing capacity of companies and 

individuals which in turn affect income capacity of the country and you as leaders of the country. I 

know it seems like a small obscure community in the middle of nowhere; however, this community is 

part of the community/industry that feeds the world and provides thousands of jobs for people all over 

this country. 

The 737-400 combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to 

continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet carrier simply 

cannot provide. Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with Required Navigation 

Performance Technology, which enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement 

weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to 

dependably reach the community. Moreover, Alaska's service provides Adak passengers with the 

benefit of expedited and seamless on-line connections to most major cities in the "lower 48," via the 

airline's Anchorage hub. All of these jet service capabilities are critical to the success of the Adak 

community in maintaining and growing our economy. 

The Fishing Company of Alaska, Inc. 

200 WEST THOMAS, SUITE 440 • SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98119 

PHONE (206) 284-1559 • FAX (206) 284-2338 
SI0-10041 3-019 

Alaska Airlines has a long history of air service throughout the state of Alaska and to the Adak 

community. We respectfully urge the Department to select Alaska Airlines to continue to provide 

essential air service to the Adak community. 

irem 

Personnel Administrator 

cc: Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Parnell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Leo von Scheben, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and Public Facilities 

The Honorable Don Young, U.S. Congressman 

The Honorable Lisa Murkowski, U.S. Senator 

The Honorable Mark Begich, U.S. Senator
# C_2015011EN.01000301.xml

| 15.1.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 11/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 11/3

---

Special Report No 19/2014

‘EU Pre-accession Assistance to Serbia’

(2015/C 11/03)

The European Court of Auditors hereby informs you that Special Report No 19/2014 ‘EU Pre-accession Assistance to Serbia’ has just been published.

The report can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the European Court of Auditors’ website: http://eca.europa.eu

A hard copy version of the report may be obtained free of charge on request to the Court of Auditors:

| European Court of Auditors |
| --- |
| Publications (PUB) |
| 12, rue Alcide de Gasperi |
| 1615 Luxembourg |
| LUXEMBOURG |
| Tel. +352 4398-1 |
| E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu |

European Court of Auditors

Publications (PUB)

12, rue Alcide de Gasperi

1615 Luxembourg

LUXEMBOURG

Tel. +352 4398-1

E-mail: eca-info@eca.europa.eu

or by filling in an electronic order form on EU-Bookshop.

---
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00361-CR

DAMIEN DEMARQUIS HUCKABY APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM THE 211TH DISTRICT COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. F-2000-1289-C

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Damien Demarquis Huckaby attempts to appeal from the trial 

court’s order denying his motion for appointment of counsel to prepare and 

prosecute a postconviction application for writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code 

Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West 2015). 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

By letter dated October 5, 2016, we notified Appellant of our concern that 

we may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because this court has no jurisdiction 

over matters relating to postconviction applications under article 11.07 of the 

code of criminal procedure, including requests for appointment of counsel. See 

id.; Self v. State, Nos. 02-15-00193-CR, 02-15-00194-CR, 2015 WL 4497727, at 

*1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth July 23, 2015, pet. ref’d) (mem. op., not designated for 

publication). 

We notified Appellant that his appeal could be dismissed based on our lack 

of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue the appeal filed a 

response showing grounds for continuing the appeal by October 17, 2016. See 

Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f), 44.3. Appellant filed a response but did not provide us 

with any basis of jurisdiction over his appeal. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; WALKER and SUDDERTH, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: November 17, 2016
99-1104.

#### Padney v. Metrohealth Med. Ctr.

Cuyahoga App. No. 76276. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. On July 19,1999, appellant filed a motion to strike appellees’ memorandum in response. It appearing to the court that the motion to strike is, in substance, a reply memorandum and, whereas, S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(3) prohibits the filing of reply memoranda,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellant’s motion to strike be, and hereby is, stricken.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; NINDS Center Core (P30) and Research Resource (R24) Review.                    

*Date:*                         April 17, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Washington Plaza Hotel, 10 Thomas Circle NW., Washington, DC 20005.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Natalia Strunnikova, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, NINDS/NIH/DHHS/Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Suite 3208, MSC 9529, Bethesda, MD 20892-9529, 301-402-0288,                         *natalia.strunnikova@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 11, 2015.

Carolyn Baum,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-05968 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2014167EN.01000301.xml

| 4.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/3

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,25 % on 1 June 2014

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

3 June 2014

2014/C 167/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3645 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 139,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4638 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81470 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1044 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2216 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1815 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,463 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,93 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1480 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3968 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8765 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4731 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4888 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5791 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6122 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7135 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 396,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6422 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5337 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5715 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 104,42 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4059 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,856 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,8104 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,571 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0909 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6355 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,0630 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3645

JPY

Japanese yen

139,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4638

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81470

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1044

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2216

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1815

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,463

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,93

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1480

RON

Romanian leu

4,3968

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8765

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4731

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4888

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5791

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6122

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7135

KRW

South Korean won

1 396,84

ZAR

South African rand

14,6422

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5337

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5715

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 104,42

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4059

PHP

Philippine peso

59,856

RUB

Russian rouble

47,8104

THB

Thai baht

44,571

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0909

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6355

INR

Indian rupee

81,0630

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---