alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014310EN.01000301.xml

| 12.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 310/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 310/3

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

11 September 2014

2014/C 310/02

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2928 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,38 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4435 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1945 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2100 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2035 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,635 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 314,80 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1986 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4190 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8440 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4182 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4236 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,0200 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5794 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6346 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 341,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1981 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,9245 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6220 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 325,23 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1337 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,920 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,5670 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,628 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9671 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,0953 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 78,8026 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2928

JPY

Japanese yen

138,38

DKK

Danish krone

7,4435

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79580

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1945

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2100

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2035

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,635

HUF

Hungarian forint

314,80

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1986

RON

Romanian leu

4,4190

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8440

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4182

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4236

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,0200

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5794

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6346

KRW

South Korean won

1 341,49

ZAR

South African rand

14,1981

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,9245

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6220

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 325,23

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1337

PHP

Philippine peso

56,920

RUB

Russian rouble

48,5670

THB

Thai baht

41,628

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9671

MXN

Mexican peso

17,0953

INR

Indian rupee

78,8026

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Re gu l ator1 ' E v a lu ation


### Dock et No. FAA- Dirc c to r<Hc Ide n t ifi e r: 

### -A D 

## Jf

yo u m akl! clwu ges f o the ml r ws 

### in the ruh/ (' he l mr ..

mu mu sf ensr11· e fill! l ufol :i upd o te**occ ordin** **~l'.** 

### If th ey do not , click 

### (or l' ah) int o 

### ond rli e11 o ut <!ftlw 

### clu111ged 

### cell.**·~----~~ ----** **-- ----------------------------** **--_j** Est i mated C o sts: Action Co s ts pe r P r od uct ( e . g . . a ircraf t engine. (e.g. , Inspect ion. propell e r, app l ia nce) Work-hours Labo r Part s C o s t Tota l Cos ts Numb er of Total Cost rep lace m e n

t) ( i nclude cost (l ab o r + 

### u.s . for U.S. Flee t Do n o t includ e o ncond ition c osts here acces s, t es t in g. (@$85 / h parts) Regi s tered and c lo se -up ) our) Products 

### REPL ACEMENT 2
. 0 $ 0 

## 82

I I

. . I



### j l 

### i

.. 

## I I

I ' I I T h e known n u mb er of pr od uct s i n compli ance : Tot a l Costs ofconu> l iance for U
. S
. flee t: $ 1 3 , 940 Costs cove re d under warra nt y (if known) $ O n -Co n diti o n Cost s : Action Work-ho urs Labor cost P ar1s Cos t Cost per Product (e
. g., In spection. (include access. (@Sl? :' ' hour )

repl acemen t ) testing, and closeup)


### _j S peci a l con s i d e ration s fo r· Eco n omic A n a l ysis (Use this .field to l!xplain an_,·thing in the Est in uaed Costs table that wa s ass um ed or might not be ob1·ious. Thisfield can also be us ed to explain lt'arranty costs) :E xec u t i ve 

### Ord e r 1 2866: 

### Co uld th e AD be con ide r cd a " s ignificant reg u l ato r y ac t i o n · · ? 

# G YI2S* 

# D NO 

### cg] *Explanati o n: D OT R eg ul atO J )' P o li c i e s nnd Pr ocedu r es: 

### I s th e AD s ignifi c a nt ? 

## @ YI::S* 

## D NO 

### cg] *Ex pl a nati on : Reg ui Hto• -y F ' lex ibi li t )' A<·t : 

### Will th e AD ha ve a s i g ni f i c ant ec o nomic impa ct 0 11 

### a su b s t ant i a l num be r o f , m a l l e ntit i e s? Ex plain for e ither a Ye s or No an wer. 

# ® YES 

## D NO 

### cg] Ex plan ati o n: I n t r a s tate Aviation in Al a s l<a: 

### This A D cou l d af f ect intra s tate av i ati on in Alaska
. I s it appro pr iate t o in cl ud e spec i fic requ ir e m e nts for aircraft ope rat e d in A la s ka whe re avi a ti o n mi g h t he th e <'nl y 

### mod .! o f tran s por t ation? 

## @ YES* 

## D NO 

### cg] *Explanati on:
# C_2014109EN.01000101.xml

| 11.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6541 — Glencore/Xstrata)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 109/01

On 22 November 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6541. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6541. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Edge Petroleum Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
3333-61890) on Form S-8, the registration statement (No. 333-22571) on Form S-8,
registration statement (No. 333-93209) on Form S-8 and registration statement
(No. 333-79759) on Form S-3 of Edge Petroleum Corporation and subsidiaries of
our report dated March 14, 2003, except as to Note 14, which is as of August 28,
2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Edge Petroleum
Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2002, and all
related financial statement schedules, which report appears in the December 31,
2002 annual report on Form 10-K of Edge Petroleum Corporation.

Our report contains an explanatory paragraph that states that, effective January
1, 2001, the Company changed its method of accounting for derivative
instruments.


                                                         KPMG LLP



Houston, Texas
October 15, 2003
LAWRENCE DEAN LaRUE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3012

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 3, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Angela Cox, Judge.

Lawrence Dean LaRue, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, ROWE, and KELSEY, JJ., CONCUR.
# C_2014308EN.01000202.xml

| 11.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7374 — Bain Capital/Itochu/Bellsystems)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 308/04

On 5 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7374. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7374. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In connection with the Annual Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Bruce J. Haber, Chief Executive Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.








March 23, 2010/s/
Bruce J. HaberBruce J. HaberChief Executive Officer
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1000 

KA 14-02131 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DARRYL ANDERSON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (TIMOTHY P. MURPHY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

MICHAEL J. FLAHERTY, JR., ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DONNA A.

MILLING OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Thomas P.

Franczyk, J.), rendered October 21, 2014. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the second

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon his plea of guilty of attempted assault in the second degree

(Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [3]). We reject defendant’s contention

that his waiver of the right to appeal is invalid. “[T]he record

demonstrates that County Court engage[d] the defendant in an adequate

colloquy to ensure that the waiver of the right to appeal was a

knowing and voluntary choice” (People v Burt, 101 AD3d 1729, 1730, lv

denied 20 NY3d 1060 [internal quotation marks omitted]). Defendant’s

valid waiver of the right to appeal encompasses his contention that

the sentence is unduly harsh and severe (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d

248, 256; see generally People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825, 827; People v

Hidalgo, 91 NY2d 733, 737).

Entered: November 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
REF ID :A67527. 

• 

b· \J,r 

c. ~ ---- -- - -- - ------------- - ------ -

·&· "l-t'c.t: r~ -- ----------- ------------~~ .. ~~~ 

e.. (~ -:-:' __ ~l(?tl.. ~ ~~~-~ ~· ~:r~. 

-l""· ~~ ·-------

____ 'Ji! 1-~--- '>_~ "-- ~ w-' --~ t&t:.' _ . _ <.Y - . ~\1-- Q..4r 11\~ 

----- - ___ 9<h~-~~ ~o4.. __ . ~c.-...ir.UJQJ..h> f<--oitinlla.'t~~~"' 'l.\.o-.o Su.th -r -

-~--~'"'"-~--'St:·---~ - - - ------- -- -- - --- -

~ ---~ ~~'!-a.fa. - - ;.i__: _.__ - "'42)_ ~ .- ~ ... 

1 n1"1'f"'...., ...,..,.._ ~ -~ "':--ey;:-, 

·- ~-:-_6~' /)~: ·-~ ~·- ~~,,'~t p,~ 

-- ~ 9· ~ ~ l~'"' -----·- --

. -- -~ --------~ :-~ A~ ~. !~~ ,A_ 

~ B ~ i ~ -

.--~~ 

'.J. '~ \~~S--l°\11 . 

------------------~- ----'---

" -!\~proved for Rel.ease bv NSA on 01-09-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352\)------

• 

REF ID:A67527 

. . 

_Jo-_ 1'1l:-_a. ~· ~. ___ _ 

-:-!__ ~- . O.· ~ ~ ~ ~ &_~ --·- . 

-----~--'-b. c~~ .. ___ _ .___.__C.. ~ ... -- . - - . 

.____·tt .. ~ U_ --· --- ---- -

. . . . ' 
: REF ID :A67527 

, - - . . . . . -. . ~; R " ---- ____ Jg l 'i- lC\. 'l ~ ILi~ . --------

. /,.-.....-

__:_: __ ----~ j ~· ~~ -- - -~--·-: ~~-~ ~~ --- --

------- ---~~-~-~ ~~ ~"'\ c ~ ----- -- -· -· ·----=-

-~-- ·--·---~~- ~-. ~ ... ,_;v7 p~~ -- - . --

-- ~ ---~~----~ ~I M-ct'f - --·- ~ -· ·---~··· ·~-

-·---~ ----~-· ----~ -~ ~~- ~,....~ ·--- --

-- ___ · __ -~---:f~-!~it~~. ~ 1,, w ¥.·At-~ .. -l"'\l-~. ~ "-'1.a.-~...- ~-Wo.rr ~ao .. n110 .. ~-(1~ 

- , .. ~~ ~t-~ -

· Nl-'6 ., . ~ 

-------·--
' 

REF ID·:A67527 

---~-'WI _,;,,*"'. ~ ~ 

~~ 

.r~~ 

__ _:___·_~ to A->+ 

_ ~--r sa~ 

C._<;.o __ --'---'g5 __ -:~--T~-·- -- . - ··-- __ , __ --·-- .. -- , ---·------------------------------- .. --

. ----- ·------------ ------- ______________ , 

---~- . - .. 

.. !t ..: -. .. ;.. ,,. ....... l' 

·-------------· -. 

-- --- -· 

-- ------ - ------------

- . ··-- - -----~-----------~-----------------------.,..----

' 

-------

------·------......,.--, - ---------------------~---------------------

---------------

.. \, ....
EXHIBIT 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Robert O. Knutson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wind Energy America Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 1O-QSB of Wind Energy America Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: November 13, 2007 | /s/ Robert O. Knutson |
|-------------------------|-----------------------|

Robert O. Knutson
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6958

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JUSTIN DAARON JOHNSON, a/k/a J-Rock,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. James C. Dever III, District Judge. (5:18-cr-00101-D-2; 5:22-cv-00263-D)

Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 3, 2024

Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Justin Daaron Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6958 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Justin Daaron Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on 

his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. 

Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473,

484 (2000)).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Johnson has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6958 Doc: 14 Filed: 06/03/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification
Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John Adam Kanas, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                        
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ John Adam Kanas    
|                       
|John Adam Kanas        
|President and          
|Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to North Fork
Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by North Fork Bancorporation, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

35
LEWISTOWN MUNICIPAL AIRPORT BOARD 

Carl Seilstad, Airport Board Chairman 

P0Box343 

Lewistown, Montana 59457 

April 8, 2013 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor, Room Wl2-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE 

Washington DC 20590 

To Whom This May Concern: 

Telephone ( 406) 535-3264 

Fax number ( 406) 535-5396 

lwt@midrivers.com 

'I• ••••••••• ,:: 

l ....... ·~\ ~~::~:;;~;~_:_:; .~::~::::~:~:~~:: (:.:::~~:. 

The Lewistown Airport Board formally appeals the ORDER TO SHO\Y1:., C~!J.~E .. PROPOSING 

TERMINATION OF ESSENTIAL AIR SERVICE ELIGIBILITY, Docket DO:.J!-OST-1997-2605. This 

Order terminates the eligibility of Lewistown under the Essential Air Service (EAS) program. 

The Board requests an Order reprieve of two (2) years in order to have the opportunity to increase the 

passenger numbers out of Lewistown. 

The Airport passenger numbers were much higher two years ago when there was a flight from 

Lewistown, MT to Denver, CO and we have genuine community support for the reestablished 

Lewistown to Denver flights. 

Listed are compelling reasons for continued EAS funding for Lewistown air service: 

• The airline is the only public ttal.J.SpOrtation out of Lewistown as there is no longer bus or 

train service; 

• Loss of air service would cripple an already struggling local economy and have an 

adverse impact on future business growth; 

• Montana is the 4th largest state and being a small community, Lewistown and Fergus 

County residents have great driving distances to destination hubs. 

If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me by telephone at 406-535-5119 

or by email at cseilstad@co.fergus.mt.us 

Thank you for your consideration of our appeal and request. 

Respectfully submitted, 

tf.J~ 

Carl Seilstad 

Board Chairman 

Lewistown Municipal Airport