alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014425EN.01000101.xml

| 27.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 425/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 425/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7407 — Lear Corporation/Everett Smith Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 425/01

On 21 November 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7407. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7407. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014099EN.01000101.xml

| 4.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP M.7171 — Varo Energy/Bayernoil Package)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 99/01

On 28 March 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7171. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7171. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2015090EN.01002301.xml

| 17.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/23

---

Call for proposals under the work programme of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking

(2015/C 90/04)

Notice is hereby given of the launch of a call for proposals under the work programme of the ECSEL Joint Undertaking.

Proposals are invited for the following call: H2020-ECSEL-2015-1-RIA-two-stage.

H2020-ECSEL-2015-1-RIA-two-stage

Call documentation including deadline and budget is given in the call text, which is published on the following websites:

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal (funding opportunities — calls)

http://ecsel.eu/web/calls/CALLS_2015.php

---
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000348

31-MAR-2016

08:21 AM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

867 

KA 13-01992 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JOHN E. SABINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (JOHN C. TUNNEY OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Joseph W.

Latham, J.), rendered June 25, 2013. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged

instrument in the second degree. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by defendant on August 29, 2016, and by the attorneys for the

parties on August 9 and 15, 2016,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

upon stipulation.

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANTONIO ALEJANDRO GUTIERREZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC.,

Pension Administration,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14-35939

D.C. No. 3:13-cv-01219-HZ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Marco A. Hernandez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Antonio Alejandro Gutierrez appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action alleging violations of the Employment Retirement

FILED

NOV 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) relating to his eligibility for pension

benefits and requests for plan documents. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under Federal

Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 341 (9th Cir.

2010). We may affirm on any basis supported by the record, Johnson v. Riverside

Healthcare Sys., LP, 534 F.3d 1116, 1121 (9th Cir. 2008), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Gutierrez’s claim that defendant failed

to furnish plan documents because Gutierrez failed to allege facts sufficient to

show a violation of ERISA. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 1021(a), 1024(b)(4) (requiring plan

administrator to furnish to a plan participant, upon written request, a copy of the

latest updated summary plan description). 

Dismissal of Gutierrez’s claim regarding his eligibility for benefits was

proper because Gutierrez failed to allege facts sufficient to show that defendant

violated ERISA by determining that he was ineligible for partial benefits. See

Wilhelm v. Rotman, 680 F.3d 1113, 1116 n.1 (9th Cir. 2012) (exhibits attached to

the complaint may be considered to decide whether dismissal is proper); Bance v.

Alaska Carpenters Ret. Plan, 829 F.2d 820, 823-24 (9th Cir. 1987) (“ERISA set

forth mandatory minimums by way of alternative formulas under which a

qualifying plan must provide for vesting to occur.”); Hernandez v. S. Nev. Culinary

2 14-35939
& Bartenders Pension Tr., 662 F.2d 617, 620 (9th Cir. 1981) (“ERISA’s minimum

vesting provisions require only that, once an employee-participant satisfies his

pension plan’s length of service requirement, his right to receive his vested pension

benefits mature on his reaching the normal retirement age contained in the plan.”). 

AFFIRMED.

3 14-35939
Before After Zone Lead TimeWall HE Wall HE Wall HE HE HE AECOShort 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 BGE Long 13:22 14 15:22 16 17:23 18 12,13 20,21 BGE Short 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 DPL Long 13:38 14 15:38 16 17:29 18 12,13 20,21 DPL Short 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 JCPL Long 13:22 14 15:22 16 17:23 18 12,13 20,21 JCPL Short 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 METEDShort 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 PECO Long 13:22 14 15:22 16 17:23 18 12,13 20,21 PECOShort 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 PENELECLong 13:22 14 15:22 16 17:23 18 12,13 20,21 PEPCOLong 13:22 14 15:22 16 17:23 18 12,13 20,21 PEPCOShort 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 PPL Short 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 PSEG Short 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 RECOShort 14:28 15 15:28 16 17:34 18 13,14 20,21 Notes: 1)Wallis the time as it would appear on a clock on a wall 2)HEis time in Hour Ending format 3)Capacity Compliance Hoursare the hours for which compliance will be measured 4)Same Day CBL hours:loads for these four (4) hours should be averaged if using the Same Day CBL method for compliance 5) All times are in Eastern Daylight Time (EDT) HE Capacity Compliance Hours Same Day CBL hours Notice Time July 18, 2012 Load Management (DR) Event Key Times and Hours

Start Time Implement Conclude End Time

17 17 17

17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: 

AMENDMENT OF RULES 4001, 

4002, 4004, 4007, 4008, 4012 AND 

4014 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA 

RULES OF JUDICIAL 

ADMINISTRATION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 498

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 25th day of May, 2018, it is Ordered pursuant to Article V, Section 

10 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania that Rules 4001, 4002, 4004, 4007, 4008, 4012 

and 4014 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Judicial Administration are amended in the 

attached form. 

This Order shall be processed in accordance with Pa.R.J.A. No. 103(b), and shall 

be effective July 1, 2018.

Additions to the rule are shown in bold and are underlined.

Deletions from the rule are shown in bold and in brackets.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 30, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00742

- CR

Andres Sol is VIELMA

, Appellant

v.

The State of TexasAppellee/s

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- 09

- 12304

- CR

Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The Appellant ’s Motion fo r Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to February 23, 2015.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Daniel J. Kindred

38th Judicial District Attorney

3102 Avenue G

Hondo, TX 78861 Nancy B. Barohn

Attorney At Law

1202 South Alamo Street

San Antonio, TX 78210
# C_2014427EN.01000202.xml

| 28.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7155 — SSAB/Rautaruukki)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 427/03)

On 14 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7155. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7155. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
SunTrust Mortgage, Inc.                      Ralph B. Carrigan
Mail Code CC-502                             President & Chief Operating Officer
P.O. Box 4333
Atlanta,  GA 30302
Tel (770) 352-5610
Fax (770) 352-5608








(logo)SUNTRUST



January 31, 1997



Arthur Andersen LLP
133 Peachtree Street, NE
Atlanta, Georgia 30303



Dear Sirs:


As of and for the year ended  December 31,  1996,  SunTrust  Mortgage,  Inc. has
complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth
in the Mortgage  Bankers  Association of America's  UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION
PROGRAM  FOR  MORTGAGE  BANKERS. As of and  for  this  same  period,  SunTrust
Mortgage, Inc. had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in
the amounts of $100,000,000 and $15,000,000 respectively.



Sincerely,



/s/Ralph B. Carrigan
Ralph B. Carrigan
President/COO



RBC/rh



CFO\AA297
Exhibit 21.0**SUBSIDIARIES OF FAMOUS DAVE’S OF AMERICA, INC.**         **Entity** **FEIN** **% of Ownership** Famous Dave’s of America, Inc.  41-1782300   100%         D&D of Minnesota, Inc.  41-1856702   100%         Famous Dave’s Properties of Texas, Inc.  61-1412539   100%         Famous Dave’s Ribs of Maryland, Inc.  41-1958496   96%         Famous Dave’s Ribs of Texas, Inc.  30-0070809   100%         Famous Dave’s Ribs of Texas, LP  37-1428481   100%         Famous Dave’s Ribs, Inc.  41-1884517   100%         Famous Dave’s Ribs-U, Inc.  41-1884548   100%         FDA Properties of Texas, LP  30-0070820   100%         FDA Properties, Inc.  36-4379010   100%         Lake & Hennepin BBQ and Blues, Inc.  41-1834594   100%         Minwood Partners, Inc.  51-0396229   100%
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the amended Quarterly Report of Unigene Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2000 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
William Steinhauer, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial position and results of operations of the Company.



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ William Steinhauer     
|William Steinhauer         
|Vice President of Finance  
|Principal Financial Officer
|March 5, 2008              

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Unigene
Laboratories, Inc. and will be retained by Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-2193

ROBERT JOHN SCHIEBLE, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
NEVILLE LORICK, President, SCE&G; JENKINS, Manager, Summerville Office, SCE&G; H. RICHARD ROSEBROCH, County Council Chairman for Dorchester County; JAMES JACKSON; RANDY GREEN, Defendants - Appellees, and SCE&G, Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1400-2-12) Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 4, 2004
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Robert John Schieble, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John A. Massalon, WILLS & MASSALON, Charleston, South Carolina; M. Dawes Cooke, Peter G. Nistad, BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON & HELMS, L.L.C., Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Robert John Schieble, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2000) complaint without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr. , 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson , 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 19, 2003 . The notice of appeal was filed on September 19, 2003. Because Schieble failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
# C_2014420EN.01000701.xml

| 22.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 420/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 420/7

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

21 November 2014

2014/C 420/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2422 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 146,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4413 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79210 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2295 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2024 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4020 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,660 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 304,56 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2047 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4446 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,7595 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4257 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,3987 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,6348 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5681 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6113 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 380,64 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,5636 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,6113 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6723 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 003,90 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1463 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 55,792 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 56,5081 |
| THB | Thai baht | 40,663 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1657 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 16,9107 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 76,5880 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2422

JPY

Japanese yen

146,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4413

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79210

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2295

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2024

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4020

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,660

HUF

Hungarian forint

304,56

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2047

RON

Romanian leu

4,4446

TRY

Turkish lira

2,7595

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4257

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,3987

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,6348

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5681

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6113

KRW

South Korean won

1 380,64

ZAR

South African rand

13,5636

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,6113

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6723

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 003,90

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1463

PHP

Philippine peso

55,792

RUB

Russian rouble

56,5081

THB

Thai baht

40,663

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1657

MXN

Mexican peso

16,9107

INR

Indian rupee

76,5880

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
32.1     Certification of the Chief Executive Officer of Darwin Resources, Inc. pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Darwin Resources, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Mark Rentschler, Chief Executive Officer of Darwin Resources, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Dated: April 12, 2010

/s/ MARK RENTSCHLERMark RentschlerChief Executive Officer
CERTIFICATION

I, Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Air T, Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
     necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
     under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
     the period covered by this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
     of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
     report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
     defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
     registrant and have:
     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
     supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
     registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
     us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
     which this report is being prepared;
     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
     about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
     of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
     evaluation; and
     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
     most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
     reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
     control over financial reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
     on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
     reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
     registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):
     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
     design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
     are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
     record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
     other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  November 4, 2004
 /s/ Walter Clark
Walter Clark
Chief Executive Officer