15334 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Notices 

an Antimicrobial Pesticide Product 

Using a Brush and Roller for Indoor 

Surface Painting 

c. AEATF Protocol: Determination of 

Removal Efficiency of 1,2- 

Benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one (BIT) from 

Hand Surfaces Using an Isopropyl 

Alcohol/Water Wipe and Wash 

Procedure 

d. Laboratory Evaluation of Bite 

Protection from Repellent 

Impregnated Clothing for the United 

States Military 

e. Background presentation on the 

Repellency Awareness Graphic and 

possible implications for the HSRB 

f. Report from the HSRB Work Group of 

the Return of Individual Research 

Results 

2. Meeting minutes and reports. 

Minutes of the meeting, summarizing 

the matters discussed and 

recommendations, if any, made by the 

advisory committee regarding such 

matters, will be released within 90 

calendar days of the meeting. Such 

minutes will be available at http:// 

www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ and http:// 

www.regulations.gov. In addition, 

information regarding the Board’s final 

meeting report, will be found at http:// 

www.epa.gov/osa/hsrb/ or from the 

person listed under FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT. 

Dated: March 10, 2014. 

Glenn Paulson, 

Science Advisor. 

[FR Doc. 2014–05908 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

[FRL–9908–32–OSWER] 

FY2014 Supplemental Funding for 

Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund 

(RLF) Grantees 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice of the availability of 

funds. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency’s (EPA) Office of Brownfields 

and Land Revitalization (OBLR) plans to 

make available approximately $6 

million to provide supplemental funds 

to Revolving Loan Fund capitalization 

grants previously awarded 

competitively under section 104(k)(3) of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation and Liability 

Act (CERCLA). Brownfields Cleanup 

Revolving Loan Fund (BCRLF) pilots 

awarded under section 104(d)(1) of 

CERCLA that have not transitioned to 

section 104(k)(3) grants are not eligible 

to apply for these funds. EPA will 

consider awarding supplemental 

funding only to RLF grantees who have 

demonstrated an ability to deliver 

programmatic results by making at least 

one loan or subgrant. The award of these 

funds is based on the criteria described 

at CERCLA 104(k)(4)(A)(ii). 

The Agency is now accepting requests 

for supplemental funding from RLF 

grantees. Requests for funding must be 

submitted to the appropriate EPA 

Regional Brownfields Coordinator 

(listed below) by April 18, 2014. 

Funding requests for hazardous 

substances and/or petroleum funding 

will be accepted. Specific information 

on submitting a request for RLF 

supplemental funding is described 

below and additional information may 

be obtained by contacting the EPA 

Regional Brownfields Coordinator. 

DATES: This action is effective March 19, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: A request for supplemental 

funding must be in the form of a letter 

addressed to the appropriate Regional 

Brownfields Coordinator (see listing 

below) with a copy to Megan Quinn, 

Quinn.Megan@epa.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan Quinn, U.S. EPA, (202) 566–2773 

or the appropriate Brownfields Regional 

Coordinator. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

The Small Business Liability Relief 

and Brownfields Revitalization Act 

added section 104(k) to CERCLA to 

authorize federal financial assistance for 

brownfields revitalization, including 

grants for assessment, cleanup and job 

training. Section 104(k) includes a 

provision for EPA to, among other 

things, award grants to eligible entities 

to capitalize Revolving Loan Funds and 

to provide loans and subgrants for 

brownfields cleanup. Section 

104(k)(4)(A)(ii) authorizes EPA to make 

additional grant funds available to RLF 

grantees for any year after the year for 

which the initial grant is made 

(noncompetitive RLF supplemental 

funding) taking into consideration: 

(I) the number of sites and number of 

communities that are addressed by the 

revolving loan fund; 

(II) the demand for funding by eligible 

entities that have not previously 

received a grant under this subsection; 

(III) the demonstrated ability of the 

eligible entity to use the revolving loan 

fund to enhance remediation and 

provide funds on a continuing basis; 

and 

(IV) such other similar factors as the 

[Agency] considers appropriate to carry 

out this subsection. 

Eligibility 

In order to be considered for 

supplemental funding, grantees must 

demonstrate that they have expended 

existing funds and that they have a clear 

plan for quickly expending requested 

additional funds. Grantees must 

demonstrate that they have made at 

least one loan or subgrant prior to 

applying for this supplemental funding 

and have significantly depleted existing 

available funds. For FY2014, EPA 

defines ‘‘significantly depleted funds’’ 

as any grant where $400,000 or less 

remains uncommitted. Additionally, the 

RLF recipient must have demonstrated 

a need for supplemental funding based 

on, among other factors, the number of 

sites that will be addressed; 

demonstrated the ability to make loans 

and subgrants for cleanups that can be 

started and completed expeditiously 

(i.e., ‘‘shovel-ready’’ projects) and will 

lead to redevelopment; demonstrated 

the existence of additional leveraged 

funds to complete the project in a timely 

manner and move quickly from cleanup 

to redevelopment, including the use of 

tax incentives such as new market tax 

credits, direct funding or other 

resources to advance the project to 

completion; demonstrated the ability to 

administer and revolve the 

capitalization funding in the RLF grant; 

demonstrated an ability to use the RLF 

grant to address funding gaps for 

cleanup; and demonstrated that they 

have provided a community benefit 

from past and potential loan(s) and/or 

subgrant(s). Special consideration may 

be given to those communities affected 

by plant closures or other economic 

disruptions. Special consideration may 

also be given to those grantees that can 

demonstrate projects that have a clear 

prospect of aiding the in-sourcing of 

manufacturing capacity and keeping 

and/or adding jobs, or otherwise 

creating jobs, in the affected area. EPA 

encourages innovative approaches to 

maximizing revolving and leveraging 

with other funds, including use of 

grants funds as a loan loss guarantee, 

combining with other government or 

private sector lending resources. 

Applicants for supplemental funding 

must contact the appropriate Regional 

Brownfields Coordinator below to 

obtain information on the format for 

supplemental funding applications for 

their region. When requesting 

supplemental funding, applicants must 

specify whether they are seeking 

funding for sites contaminated by 

hazardous substances or petroleum. 


sroberts on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 53 / Wednesday, March 19, 2014 / Notices 15335 

Applicants may request both types of 

funding. 

REGIONAL CONTACTS

Region States Address/phone number/email 

EPA Region 1, Frank Gardner, Gardner.Frank@epa.gov CT, ME, MA, NH, RI, VT .... 5 Post Office Square, Boston, MA 02109–3912, Phone 

(617) 918–1278, Fax (617) 918–1291. 

EPA Region 2, Lya Theodoratos, Theodoratos.Lya@

epa.gov.

NJ, NY, PR, VI ................... 290 Broadway, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10007, 

Phone (212) 637–3260, Fax (212) 637–3083. 

EPA Region 3, Tom Stolle, Stolle.Tom@epa.gov ............ DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV 1650 Arch Street, Mail Code 3HS51, Philadelphia, 

Pennsylvania 19103, Phone (215) 814–3129, Fax 

(215) 814–5518. 

EPA Region 4, Wanda Jennings, Jennings.Wanda@

epa.gov.

AL, FL, GA, KY, MS, NC, 

SC, TN.

Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 10TH 

FL , Atlanta, GA 30303–8960, Phone (404) 562– 

8682, Fax (404) 562–8439. 

EPA Region 5, Keary Cragan, Cragan.Keary@epa.gov .. IL, IN, MI, MN, OH, WI ....... 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Mail Code SE–4J, Chicago, Illinois 60604–3507, Phone (312) 353–5669, 

Fax (312) 886–7190. 

EPA Region 6, Mary Kemp, Kemp.Mary@epa.gov ......... AR, LA, NM, OK, TX .......... 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 (6SF–PB), Dallas, 

Texas 75202–2733, Phone (214) 665–8358, Fax 

(214) 665–6660. 

EPA Region 7, Susan Klein, Klein.Susan@epa.gov ........ IA, KS, MO, NE .................. 11201 Renner Blvd, Lenexa, Kansas 66219, Phone 

(913) 551–7786, Fax (913) 551–8688. 

EPA Region 8, Dan Heffernan, Heffernan.Daniel@

epa.gov.

CO, MT, ND, SD, UT, WY 1595 Wynkoop Street (EPR–B), Denver, CO 80202– 

1129, Phone (303) 312–7074, Fax (303) 312–6065. 

EPA Region 9, Noemi Emeric-Ford, EmericFord.Noemi@epa.gov.AZ, CA, HI, NV, AS, GU .... 75 Hawthorne Street, WST–8, San Francisco, CA 

94105, Phone (213) 244–1821, Fax (415) 972–3364. 

EPA Region 10, Susan Morales, Morales.Susan@

epa.gov.

AK, ID, OR, WA ................. 1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900, Mailstop: ECL–112 Seattle, WA 98101, Phone (206) 553–7299, Fax (206) 

553–0124. 

Dated: March 12, 2014. 

David R. Lloyd, 

Director, Office of Brownfields and Land 

Revitalization, Office of Solid Waste and 

Emergency Response. 

[FR Doc. 2014–06048 Filed 3–18–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Information Collection Being Reviewed 

by the Federal Communications 

Commission 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, and as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520), the Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC or the Commission) 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

Whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

PRA that does not display a valid Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

control number. 

DATES: Written PRA comments should 

be submitted on or before May 19, 2014. 

If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Cathy Williams, FCC, via email PRA@

fcc.gov and to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0849. 

Title: Commercial Availability of 

Navigation Devices. 

Form Number: Not applicable. 

Type of Review: Revision of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Business or other forprofit entities. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 962 respondents; 585,800 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 

0.00278 hours—120 hours. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping requirement; Third party 

disclosure requirement; On occasion 

reporting requirement; Annual reporting 

requirement; Semi-annual reporting 

requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority is contained in Sections 4(i), 

303(r) and 629 of the Communications 

Act of 1934, as amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 48,152 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: $2,620. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Needs and Uses: In January 2013, the 

D.C. Circuit released its opinion in 

EchoStar Satellite L.L.C. v. FCC, 704 

F.3d 992 (D.C. Cir. 2013). In that 

decision, the D.C. Circuit vacated the 


sroberts on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with NOTICES