alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,830
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,610
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    119,317
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          27,246
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            27,098
<LOANS>                                        173,908
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 346,319
<DEPOSITS>                                     289,201
<SHORT-TERM>                                     6,509
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,150
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,476
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,984
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 346,319
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,607
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,646
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   156
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,409
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,268
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,645
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,765
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      900
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   7
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  8,164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,239
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,690
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,690
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.02
<LOANS-NON>                                        874
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,378
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   350
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,677
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,223
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      862
<RECOVERIES>                                       318
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,579
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,579
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>

EXHIBITT 11 - STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS (LOSS)

MEDICAL GRAPHICS CORPORATION         
  (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)


                                     THREE MONTHS         NINE MONTHS ENDED   
                                    ENDED SEPT. 30              SEPT. 30      
                                  --------------------   -------------------- 
                                    1996       1995        1996       1995    
                                  ---------  ---------   ---------  --------- 
PRIMARY AND FULLY DILUTED:

Weighted average shares 
 outstanding                      2,555,643  2,443,533   2,538,808  2,441,490 

Net effect of dilutive stock 
 options -- based on the treasury 
 stock method using period-end 
 market price, if higher than 
 average market price                37,139         --          --         -- 
                                  ---------  ---------   ---------  --------- 

  TOTAL                           2,592,782  2,443,533   2,538,808  2,441,490 
                                  ---------  ---------   ---------  --------- 
                                  ---------  ---------   ---------  --------- 

Net income (loss)                 $      73  $    (215)  $  (1,721) $  (1,567)

Net income (loss) per share of 
 Common Stock                     $    0.03  $   (0.09)  $   (0.68) $   (0.64)


                                      (8)
NUMBER 13-16-00632-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE LORETTA YOUNG CANTU

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides

Per Curiam Order

Relator, Loretta Young Cantu, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and motion for 

emergency temporary stay in the above cause on November 21, 2016. Through this 

original proceeding, relator seeks to compel the trial court to set aside an order setting a 

motion for summary judgment for hearing on grounds that the order is void because the 

trial court lacks jurisdiction. Through her motion for emergency temporary stay, relator 

seeks to stay the proceedings in the trial court pending resolution of this original 

proceeding. 
2

The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion for emergency relief, 

is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion for emergency relief is 

GRANTED and the trial court hearing set for November 30, 2016 and other trial court 

proceedings are ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the case is 

finally decided. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order 

granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). 

The Court requests that the real party in interest, Rolando Cantu, or any others 

whose interest would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the 

petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this 

order. See id. R. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

21st day of November, 2016.
**EXHIBIT      32.9**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| 1.   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Air T, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer, and John Parry, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date:  August 4, 2010











/s/ Walter Clark


Walter Clark


Chief Executive Officer














/s/ John Parry


John Parry


Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2




               CONSENT OF RYDER SCOTT COMPANY PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File Numbers 33-96242, 333-4658, and 33-90624) and on
Form S-3 (File Number 333-24691) of DeepTech International, Inc. of the use of
our report, Estimated Net Reserves and Income Data Attributable to Certain
Leasehold and Royalty Interests of Tatham Offshore, Inc., dated as of June 30,
1997, and all references to our firm appearing in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of DeepTech International Inc. for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1997.



                                     /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY 
                                         PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

                                     RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                     PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


Houston, Texas
September 24, 1997
IN REPLY 

REFER TO • REF ID:A522124 

WAR DEPARTMENT • 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

' WASHINGTON 

April 20, 1932e 

MEMORA.mmil To Mr. William F. Friedman, Cryptanalyst, 

Office of the Chief Signal Officer, Washington, D.C. 

and Mr. George A. Graham, Electrical Engineer, 

Signal Corps Laboratories, Fort Monmouth, 

Oceanport, N. J. 

(Through Channels) 

SUBJECT1 Patent Application, Serial No. 588,344, 

Cryptographic System. 

1. This will report the first official action of the Patent 

Office in the above entitled patent application, the official letter 

bearing date of April 9, 1932. A formal response to such action mu.st 

be filed in the Patent Office not· later tha.n October 9, 1932• The 

official letter indicates that thirty-three claims are"-iudged allowable. 

2. Attached will be found a complete file comprising copy 

of the specification, claims and drawings as originally filed, including a copy of the official letter,above mentioned, and printed copies 

of the patents cited against certain of the claims. This file of papers · including the printed copies of patents should be returned in due course 

with your comments and suggestions. 

3. Reference is made to the question of secrecy discussed 

at a recent personal conference in connection with the present case. 

It is understood that this question will be ta.ken under advisement 

and that the policy decided upon will be communicated to the Patents 

Section at a later date. It is further understood tha.t the prosecution 

of the case before the Patent Office will be handled in accordance with 

the decision reached on the question of secrecy. It sh~uld be noted in 

this connection that during the entire time tha.t this application ia 

undergoing prosecution before the United States Patent Office, the entire case and subject matter will remain secret, which is in accordance 

with the established practioe in all cases. 

~~.ce.~ Charles A. Rowe, 

Encls. Patents Section, Signal Corpe. 

f .. -i_. . ~,lo 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-20-2013 pursuant to E.O.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40972 

Conference Calendar

__________________

MELVIN LEE JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BETO I UNIT; UNIDENTIFIED JOHNSON,

Lieutenant at Beto I Unit; KEN E. 

KUYKENDALL, Doctor at Beto I Unit;

HERBERT SCOTT, Warden,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:95-CV-511

- - - - - - - - - -

June 26, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Melvin Johnson, #643399, appeals from the magistrate judge's

dismissal as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) of his

civil rights complaint. He contends that the magistrate judge

erred by dismissing his complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed

the record and the magistrate judge's memorandum opinion and
No. 95-40972

-2-

order and AFFIRM the dismissal of Johnson's complaint for

essentially the reasons set forth by the magistrate judge. See

Johnson v. Beto I Unit et al., No. 6:95-CV-511 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 6,

1995). Johnson's motion for a default judgment is DENIED.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

                                                                    

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM PLD TELEKOM
INC.'S FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH FORM 10-K AND THE AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FOR PLD TELEKOM INC. AT AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998
CONTAINED THEREIN.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           4,579
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,714
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,809
<INVENTORY>                                      4,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                37,397
<PP&E>                                         210,847
<DEPRECIATION>                                  41,910
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 352,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,396
<BONDS>                                        139,397
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          4
<COMMON>                                           378
<OTHER-SE>                                     124,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   352,108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               145,360
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,348
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                90,064
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,610
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,953
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,561)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,864
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (42,811)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,811)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.21)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          37,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  518,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                    25,900
<INVENTORY>                                    260,700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               886,800
<PP&E>                                         571,200
<DEPRECIATION>                                 207,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,757,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          583,000
<BONDS>                                      1,388,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     54,600
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                   (511,300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,757,800
<SALES>                                      2,238,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,238,600
<CGS>                                          743,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  743,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             133,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 68,300
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                     700
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (14,900)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    44,800
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM 10-QSB AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          341
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     0
<ALLOWANCES>                                      0
<INVENTORY>                                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                341
<PP&E>                                            0
<DEPRECIATION>                                    0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1200
<BONDS>                                           0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                       6941
<OTHER-SE>                                     (859)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    341
<SALES>                                           0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
<CGS>                                             0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              26679
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
<INCOME-TAX>                                      0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (26679)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0



</TABLE>
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-5262

_____________________________

LEON JEFFREY NICELY, JUNIOR,

Petitioner,

v.

RONNIE FUSSELL, Clerk,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus – Original Jurisdiction.

January 30, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Leon Jeffrey Nicely, Junior, pro se, Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.
EXHIBIT 15

 

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder ofAllstate Life Insurance Company:

 

 

We have reviewed, in accordance with standards of the Public CompanyAccounting Oversight Board (United States), the unaudited interim financialinformation of Allstate Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries for thethree-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, asindicated in our report dated November 10, 2004; because we did notperform an audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial information.

 

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included inyour Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,2004, is incorporated by reference in the following Registration Statements:

 
| **Forms S-3 Registration Nos.** | ** ** | **Forms N-4 Registration Nos.** |
|---------------------------------|------------|---------------------------------|
| 333-100068                      |       | 333-114560                      |
| 333-102319                      |       | 333-114561                      |
| 333-102325                      |       | 333-114562                      |
| 333-104789                      |       | 333-102934                      |
| 333-105331                      |       |                            |
| 333-112233                      |       |                            |
| 333-112249                      |       |                            |
| 333-117685                      |       |                            |
| 333-119706                      |       |                            |
| 333-119296                      |       |                            |

 

 

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of theRegistration Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a reportprepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11of that Act.

 

 
| /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
|                          |
| Chicago, Illinois             |
| November 10, 2004        |

 

E-2

----
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-7113
In Re: RICHARD CHEEKS, Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-3616-1) Submitted: October 24, 2002 Decided: October 31, 2002 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Cheeks, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Richard Cheeks petitions for a writ of mandamus. He seeks an order preventing the state court from considering his state habeas petition and preventing the state prosecutor from further participation in his case. Mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. SeeIn re First Fed. Sav. & Loan Assn. , 860 F.2d 135, 138 (4th Cir. 1988). Further, mandamus is a drastic remedy and should only be used in extraordinary circumstances. See Kerr v. United States Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 402 (1976); In re Beard , 811 F.2d 818, 826 (4th Cir. 1987). Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. See In re United Steelworkers , 595 F.2d 958, 960 (4th Cir. 1979). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, see Gurley v. Superior Court of Mecklenburg County , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969), a nd does not have jurisdiction to review state court orders, seeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). The relief sought by Cheeks is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are3 adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED