alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          60,011
<SECURITIES>                                    11,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   91,068
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,920
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,130
<PP&E>                                          36,443
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,939
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 242,534
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           306
<OTHER-SE>                                     134,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   242,534
<SALES>                                         53,606
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,606
<CGS>                                           25,149
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,149
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,925
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,462
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,414
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,414
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
*Product ingredien t *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product may be entitled to confidential treatment* 

# *Pro ource information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Prod rmation may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product ingredient *Product ingredient sourcesource information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product ingredient s o
# C_2014193EN.01002201.xml

| 24.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 193/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 193/22

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

23 June 2014

2014/C 193/06

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3596 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,46 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4549 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79940 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1283 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2167 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3240 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,458 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1498 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3969 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9044 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4405 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4594 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5385 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5573 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6972 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 385,25 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4086 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4643 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5766 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 297,11 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3691 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,606 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,5038 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,131 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0261 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6486 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,7874 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3596

JPY

Japanese yen

138,46

DKK

Danish krone

7,4549

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79940

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1283

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2167

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3240

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,458

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1498

RON

Romanian leu

4,3969

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9044

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4405

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4594

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5385

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5573

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6972

KRW

South Korean won

1 385,25

ZAR

South African rand

14,4086

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4643

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5766

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 297,11

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3691

PHP

Philippine peso

59,606

RUB

Russian rouble

46,5038

THB

Thai baht

44,131

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0261

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6486

INR

Indian rupee

81,7874

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17I0062. CHRISTINA BERENGUER MCCAIN, f/k/a CHRISTINA

BERENGUER, et al. v. TRACY L. JENNINGS.

A17I0063. THE HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF LIBERTY COUNTY d/b/a

LIBERTY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER v. TRACY L. JENNINGS 

et al. 

In these companion cases, defendantsthe Hospital Authority of LibertyCounty

d/b/a Liberty Regional Medical Center (“LRMC”), Christina Berenguer McCain,

M.D., f/k/a Christina Berenguer, M.D., and Berenguer Surgical, LLC (collectively,

the “Applicants”), seek immediate review of the trial court’s order directing LRMC

to produce non-party medical records in this medical malpractice case. These

applications were originally filed in the Georgia Supreme Court, which transferred

the applications to this Court after concluding its jurisdiction was not invoked. See

Case Nos. S17I0194 and S17I0197 (decided September 27, 2016). Simultaneously

with their filingsin the Supreme Court, the Applicantsfiled the same applicationsfor

interlocutory appeal in thisCourt. Those applications have been denied by thisCourt. 

See Case Nos. A17I0017 and A17I0018 (decided September 29, 2016). Because this

Court has already addressed the duplicative applications, they are both hereby

DISMISSED as moot. 

November 14, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/14/2016
REF ID:A59586 

CDNR3ENJllJ. -; :! IPIT'/ INfRRMATrnN 

Comment on Trip Report Dated 8 Sept. 1952 

Jlr • V. B • 1118.J",, APSA-351 

ThrU 

Technical Director, 

Machine D1v1a1on 

Chier. Machine D1v1a1on 

Techn1cal Director_ Ortice or Operation 

26 Sept. 152 

Lawless/395/rqg 

1. The laat paragraph or the attached trip report indicates a 

aiaunderstanding. In the course ot the week ot detailed 1ntroduct1on 

to the EDPM, a very major piece or equipment. concern was expressed !"reely within our APSA group (as is quite appropiate,, I belie·ve) about a number ot po1nts,, including the acheduled date ot del1ve17 

(at that time August 11 1953),, the rental cost. programming com,pl1- cat1ons due to the lack or analytic orders, and our ability to recruit 

ead train an adequate number or programmers tor the BDPM and other 

major equipments due to be delivered to AFSA 1n the near f'uture. 

Jfowever, taking tull accoWlt ot these points or concern, 1.t was and 

1' wq- tirm conviction that .APSA Bhould procede with 1ta current 

arrangements 1n the procuring ot IBM Electronic Data Processing llachinea. 

2. S:1nce the time ot our trip. the Rational Production Author1t7 

haa determined that AJ'SA ahould receive EDPM I 46 which moves our 

4el1ve17 date up to March. 1953. according to the present production achedule. Alao, programm1ng routines tor the EDPM which are much less 

1kiJ1>11cated and much taster than waa anticipated have now been written 

tor maD7 ot the operations that are accomplished by the analytic o~dera 1n our computers. 

3. The Otfice ot Operations bas a vast amount ot urgent work whi.ch 

ean on17 be carried out teaa1b17 on h1gb. speed equipment such as 

electronic com.outers. The .AFSA 11.achine Development Program will not 

•atch up with our needs tor some time to come, and certainly not with 

the advent ot ATLAS II serial 1. The EDPM equipment 1e an •interim• 

•01ut1on unt11 the urgent p.ee4a or the O£t1ce ot Operations have been 

llOre nearl.7 met-not until any apec1tic equipment baa bef!n delivered. 

b long u an urgent need ex1ata that cannot otherwise be fulfilled, 

I believe that .APSA 1R11at take advantas.e o~ the ava11ab111t7 o~ the 

KDPM eq,uipment. 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 02-06-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

In.to. copies to s AFSAooc, OOT. 02, ....._ 03, 03T~ 3020. 35 

v 

,QI____ r: '~. 1 -. I J 'f~i~ 

ILL.I.AM J. LAVLBSS1 JR. 

Technical Director, 

Jlaehine Division 

SECURIT'l INFARMATIAN
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600095

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

AJAI D. GARRETT

Seaman Recruit (E-1), U.S. Navy

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Lieutenant Colonel Elizabeth A. Harvey, USMC.

For Appellant: Lieutenant Commander Derek C. Hampton,

JAGC, USN.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 18 August 2016

_________________________

Before PALMER, MARKS, and NORKIN, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 23, 2016.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D16-2392

Lower Tribunal No. 14-1279

________________

Daniel Membreno,

Appellant,

vs.

Sofia Blancas,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Rosa C.

Figarola, Judge.

Daniel Membreno, in proper person.

Sofia Blancas, in proper person.

Before SALTER, FERNANDEZ, and LOGUE, JJ.

LOGUE, J.

The appellant’s notice of appeal was filed on October 24, 2016, more than

thirty days after September 9, 2016, which is the date the order on appeal was

rendered. The notice of appeal was therefore untimely and this court lacks
jurisdiction. “Unlike some rules that require a party to act within a specified time

of service, Rule 9.110(b) requires a notice of appeal from a final order be filed

within thirty days of the rendition of the order being appealed.” Driessen v. Oliver,

199 So. 3d 1074, 1074 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (quoting Medley Plaza, Inc. v. The

Rama Fund, LLC, 196 So. 3d 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)).

Dismissed.

2
\ 

\ 

! 

.. • f)ohn • • Jooth 

Phllco~tlon 

Sn! St.reet & Lehigh A-.enue 

l'bil.a4.elph1a 3t t hlma,ylvania 

~ ltr. Booth: 

~ ill to ~l~e :tece~t of .,-mxr l.e't.te:r at 

17 March l954 in nteren.ca t.o t.M "Q!)Q1nat1on or Mr. e. w. 

him.a tcr ~•M.p oc the •~ttce Panel of the 

kt1ocol. ~ity ~ ~lent!t:l.c ~ Jk,Jard. 

GtMral Canine hew dted. • to ~u hl.• ~1ation 

to Mt:-. ~ ~to )'011 tat tho J:OnBiderotion gi'Wm bi• Uxvitation. lt la vith ~ u vell aa ~ ~t w lMrn 

that Ms-. Mull vill be uaa\"e.1lal>le tw tha panel ~s.'lip. 

tour attw to ~. otb:mJ ill 10ur Corpor.lt!on *a can be 

Jllll4e avai.lcl>l.e to t.W.a ~ u greatly apprecS.ted, •1ne~ it 

1a 1'41ca.t1ve ot ~ coti:t.1.nutnc cooperation.., ~tenat or 

tiw PhUCQ ~tion in cut' ptobl.M:G. Ve 9111:1 i.ve oeea.aton ~ 't.ake ~ ar your MUg£eat.1on 1n tba Mure. 

eci NJ 

c/s '.A.__ Sf PSST \Nr· Friednll.n) 

11Dieorel;r, 

1fXLLlAM ., .. JJWalA.fi 

WDcut!:re ~-.... 

EA Scientitic M.viaor;f lloard 

.M/Rt Acknovle~nt or Mr. Boothta J.tr dtd. 17 Mal- !)4. Mr. c.w. 

ACla.ms (nominee tor membership on the Ma.thematics Panel of' the NSASAfl) 

vlll be unavailable £er :panel membership. 

M.M.Jhkrski/S/ASST/€-0493/22 Mar 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
# C_2014152EN.01000101.xml

| 20.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

19 May 2014

(2014/C 152/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3715 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,79 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4645 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81460 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0461 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2228 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1355 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,474 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 305,38 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1868 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4319 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8791 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4654 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4904 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6317 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5872 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7136 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 401,67 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,2635 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5545 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6100 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 656,47 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4036 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,862 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,3682 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,534 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0395 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7157 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,2000 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3715

JPY

Japanese yen

138,79

DKK

Danish krone

7,4645

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81460

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0461

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2228

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1355

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,474

HUF

Hungarian forint

305,38

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1868

RON

Romanian leu

4,4319

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8791

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4654

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4904

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6317

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5872

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7136

KRW

South Korean won

1 401,67

ZAR

South African rand

14,2635

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5545

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6100

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 656,47

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4036

PHP

Philippine peso

59,862

RUB

Russian rouble

47,3682

THB

Thai baht

44,534

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0395

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7157

INR

Indian rupee

80,2000

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131331 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131331 

 COA: 269653 

Wayne CC: 94-012673

DARREN RUFUS BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 21, 2006 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant’s motion 

for relief from judgment is prohibited by MCR 6.502(G). 

p1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously
filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 No. 333-22571 and No. 333-93209 and
Registration Statement on Form S-3 No. 333-79759, each of Edge Petroleum
Corporation (the "Company"), of our summary report dated March 17, 2003 included
as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A in respect of our reserve
report relating to the oil and gas reserves and revenues of certain interests of
the Company as of December 31, 2002 and of the data extracted from such reports
appearing in "Items 1 and 2. "Business and Properties" under the caption "Oil
and Natural Gas Reserves" and in Supplementary Financial Information on Oil and
Natural Gas Exploration, Development and Production Activities (unaudited) in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A. We hereby consent to all references to such
reports and/or this firm in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A and we hereby
consent to all references to such reports and/or to this firm in each such
Registration Statement, and further consent to our being named as an expert in
each such Registration Statement and in each Prospectus to which any such
Registration Statement relates.


                                              /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
                                                  PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
                                              ------------------------------
                                                  RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
                                                  PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

Houston, Texas
October 16, 2003
NO. SCPW-11-0000030
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I
MATTHEW MURASKO, ALANE PODOLL and KYLE PODOLL, Petitioners,

vs. THE HONORABLE RHONDA I.L. LOO, JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT, STATE OF HAWAI # I; PAT CURELL and ROSINELI CURELL, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (DC-TRO 10-1-0202)
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ. and Circuit Judge Nacino, assigned by reason of vacancy) Upon consideration of the motion for reconsideration, filed on March 17, 2011 by respondents Pat Curell and Rosineli Curell, and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 24, 2011. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Edwin C. Nacino Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-11-0000030 24-MAR-2011 01:56 PM
# C_2015066EN.01000402.xml

| 24.2.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 66/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 66/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7487 — Onex Corporation/SIG Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2015/C 66/05)

On 17 February 2015, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7487. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32015M7487. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
EX-10.2




 Exhibit 10.2 
  





 
 Attention Manuel O. Méndez, Chief Executive Officer 

October 5, 2021 
 Dear Manuel: 

Reference is made to that certain Employment Agreement between you and Quotient Limited (the “Company”), dated as of February 23, 2021 and
amended June 7, 2021 (the “Employment Agreement”). Your Employment Agreement provides for a “Discretionary Bonus” and further provides that for the Company’s fiscal year ending in 2022, your Discretionary Bonus shall be
not less than 80% of your Base Compensation of Swiss Francs 750,000, which is Swiss Francs 600,000 (the “Guaranteed 2022 Portion of the Discretionary Bonus”). 

Your entitlement to the Guaranteed 2022 Portion of the Discretionary Bonus shall be surrendered and in lieu thereof the Company shall promptly pay to you in
cash in Swiss Francs 600,000, net of social security cost deductions, to further support your relocation to Switzerland. Your eligibility for the remainder of the Company’s fiscal year 2022 Discretionary Bonus is unchanged. 

The Company will continue reimbursing pursuant to the terms of the Employment Agreement, net of social security cost deductions, expenses incurred by you in
connection with your relocation to Switzerland. For relocation expenses incurred before the earlier of (i) December 31, 2021 and (ii) your moving into your primary residence in Switzerland, such reimbursements will also be paid to you
net of taxes deductions. 
 Please indicate your agreement to the foregoing by executing this letter in the space provided below and emailing it to me. 

Sincerely, 
  

	
	 /s/ Heino von Prondzynski

	Quotient Limited

  

			
	By:	 	Heino von Prondzynski
		 	Chairman of the Board

 Acknowledged and Agreed: 
  

	
	 /s/ Manuel O. Méndez

	Manuel O. Méndez

  

			
	 Quotient Limited
  

Registered in Jersey, Channel Islands, number 109886

Registered office – 28 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey, JE2 3QA, Channel Islands

Correspondence address - PO Box 1075, JTC House, 28 Esplanade, St Helier, Jersey, JE4 2QP, Channel Islands
	  	Page 1/1
REF ID: 2945 

AHLIHGTOIJ HALL STATIOU 

Date 03 ~J.. \J.'-f 

TO 

----Commanding Officer _________ ....,....___ ~- J,.sst. GorJlllandcμit L 

---Dir. of Com .. Hes-e-ar-c"""h----1z-_---

----·EYecuti ve Officer ----A~st. Executive O~f~f~i-c_e_r _______ ._ 

--Adjutant -----Asst. Ad~j-u~t-a_n_t __________________ _ 

-----Chicif, Hoajquart.ers Branch 

--·coo:rdination ;>ection -----

----Iirl' ,, ai1C. r.~ m son Section 

'.)'.!i'3f, A LJC'l".nch ----- ----Ci oif' i'. :t: B:"'.:l:n r.h------------

1..oi.d .f~·, e B~'.'£.!t~h 

o i~i) D r~~a~~h------------- ---L !l .l_d .'f. E !~.:.·;:.:.nch -------------- ---C~lief ·• F E:> ?11~h-~-z-:g-_-.LJ_L_.μ_%_,__A_ . Dir. of ~r~ining ~ ~(!" ----2d Si.g. Serv, Bn. ----Prop d r · ::~ Officer ------------- ---rerscnnel Qf f ice_r ___________ _ 

-P10vost Harshal 

Post Engineer ----------~- -Clas:o:ii':i ed Uai~ . ..,.l_,,,,R,_o_o_m _______ _ 

Secreta~r to C. o. 

----General Files 

20 l Files ----------------- ---- ---------------------

Comments and Return 

-RecOI!IID.endations ---------

-----Information 

----Information--a-n"""d_R_e_t_ur __ n______ __ 

-----Inf. and Forwarding :...-~....------ Your Information and File ---Signature, if approved ------ I ----See Note on Back __ _... ____ __ 

As Requested ----hs Discussed-----------------

~;.re::c~~ ~ ~ ~~.~ "<---~ 

+e:<r ~-~~~~ ~ ~ ·~~~ ~I~~~ v-~