alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITY IFICATION W _,) 

- DISPOSITION FORM 

FILE NO. I SUBJECT 

• ~~ AFSA-.35/Serial 215 Comment on Language Trmslation Proposal.a. ~~l----------------~~~--!-f-RO~M------------~~------:D~U=E::--~----------:c~o=MM=e=NT=-:::N0~.-:-11 

~~~;7 TO .&FSA•oa.t' BSA.-35 9 April 1951 . :it• 

. --; :3 

......... 

. _., . .-;,;;.~ .. .: . . ~~ 

-~ ~ 1 ... 

~., 

... 

. · ' 

'' 

1. A c0111110n concept ot a solution to the language tr&m1lation problem i• a 

large memory with a simpl.e attachment which will produce a word-for-word BUbatituti 

and at least one of our correspondents noted that even with a &Ul8ll memor,r, a larp 

percentage ot words will have subati tutea. 

2. It is readily seen that this solution covers precisely the part of the 

problem where aid is least required. It would be possible to train a man to read 

and translate the artifical language produced bJ' a tull scale word-tor-word aiJlple 

substitution, but the training required is comparable with that for 1earniDg to read 

the original. language. It ma:r be noted that the inverse process does not result 1D 

clear text • 

.3. The uae ot an intermediate language is not to be disregarded, however, a 

fluent translating mchine should be able to take as input arq ot several lallguages, 

and give as output f1D7 of the saae several languages. Thia is 110et readiJ.1' done bJ' 

having available translation both wqs between a siaple language and each of the 

others. The problem. is aubstantual.17 reduced if' the simple language is oo•plete]3 

unaabigaoua, and has certain other desirable characteristics which C>Dl.7 a ayntbetia 

language will have. The dew ot this writer is that the problem should be attacked 

b7 constructing an appropriate 1J1Dthetic language, and considering translation 

between it and each ot the •natural' languagas--and that the most ditticult part !a 

the construction ot the s111thetic language. 

4• There are several degrees of completeness ot mechanical translation between 

the word-for-word substitution and the universal translator, ba.t considering the 

equipment and training or personnel required f'or each, none at present could casfl.ete 

economical.17 with a human being trained to translate. I aee no early prospect Of 

change ot that economic situation • 

. 191 ··· Enclosure - 1 ~ ~-J5 Abstract - Proposals for the llechanical Resolution , ·-...... ... ot German Syntax Patterns • ..... 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
# C_2014103EN.01000401.xml

| 8.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

7 April 2014

(2014/C 103/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3723 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 141,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4658 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82710 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9733 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2202 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2405 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,444 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 306,50 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1746 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4655 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9103 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4818 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5084 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6427 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5983 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7314 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 449,08 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4744 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5266 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6333 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 510,31 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4847 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,616 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,9978 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,581 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0843 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,9051 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,6010 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3723

JPY

Japanese yen

141,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4658

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82710

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9733

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2202

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2405

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,444

HUF

Hungarian forint

306,50

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1746

RON

Romanian leu

4,4655

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9103

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4818

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5084

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6427

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5983

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7314

KRW

South Korean won

1 449,08

ZAR

South African rand

14,4744

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5266

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6333

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 510,31

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4847

PHP

Philippine peso

61,616

RUB

Russian rouble

48,9978

THB

Thai baht

44,581

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0843

MXN

Mexican peso

17,9051

INR

Indian rupee

82,6010

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Michael Lynch, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 725]

Appeals by the defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), both rendered June 11, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree under indictment No. 98-00492 and bail jumping in the first degree under indictment No. 99-00362, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on the appeals. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted *(see Anders v California,*386 US 738 [1967]; *People v Paige,*54 AD2d 631 [1976]; *cf. People v Gonzalez,*47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Ritter, J.P., S. Miller, Townes, Crane and Rivera, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6777

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

THOMAS LEE BRINCEFIELD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00346-JAB-1; 1:11-cv-00013-JABJEP)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas Brincefield, Appellant Pro Se. John Mcrae Alsup, Robert 

Michael Hamilton, Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States 

Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Thomas Lee Brincefield appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting 

in part and denying in part his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge 

recommended that the motion be granted in part and denied in part 

and advised Brincefield that failure to file timely objections to 

this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district 

court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been 

warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 

766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 

U.S. 140 (1985). Brincefield has waived appellate review by

failing to file timely objections after receiving proper notice. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00325-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF D.P., A CHILD

On Appeal from the

135th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 13-2-74386-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. No costs are assessed as appellant filed an 

affidavit of inability to pay costs.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 23, 2014
# C_2014383EN.01000202.xml

| 29.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7423 — Vinci/Imtech ICT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2014/C 383/03)

On 23 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7423. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7423. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
---

---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Orckit Communications Ltd. (the
Company) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Uri
Shalom, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec.
1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

June 22, 2009

| |  | By:      /s/ Uri Shalom
Uri Shalom, Chief Financial Officer
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------



---

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000352715
<NAME> BIOSONICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,829
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,000
<INVENTORY>                                     63,725
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               316,151
<PP&E>                                         254,806
<DEPRECIATION>                                 242,801
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 336,587
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,283,813
<BONDS>                                        243,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,636
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,947,226)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   336,587
<SALES>                                         13,550
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,766
<CGS>                                            8,297
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  420,133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               287,545
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,415
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (412,664)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (412,664)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1



                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
AccuMed International, Inc.


We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(No. 333-04715, 033-98902, and 333-07681) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-04320
and 333-11219) on Form S-8 of AccuMed International, Inc. of our report dated
March 28, 1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of AccuMed
International, Inc. as of December 31, 1996 and 1995 and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the year ended December 31, 1996 and the three months ended December 31, 1995,
which report appears in the December 31, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB
of AccuMed International, Inc.



                                            /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP


Chicago, Illinois
April 4, 1997
King Ranch, Inc. Appellant/s Juan Antonio Garcia, Gonzalo

Chapa, Jr., and Carmen S. /s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 16, 2014

N o. 04-13-00605-CV

KING RANCH, INC

., Appellant

v.

Juan Antonio GARCIA

, Gonzalo Chapa, Jr., and Carmen S. Chapa,

Appellees

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-11-51704-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

The Appellant’s Motion for Leave to file Amended Brief is hereby GRANTED. The

Appellant’s Amended Brief is deemed filed as of January 13, 2014.

___________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of January, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: MOHAMMAD KHAN,

Debtor,

______________________________

MOHAMMAD KHAN,

Appellant,

v.

U.S. BANK, N.A., as Trustee, successor in

interest to Bank of America,

Appellee. No. 19

- 55998

D.C. No. 2:18

- cv

- 00809

- JGB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Jesus G. Bernal, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 19 , 2021 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges

.

Mohammad Khan appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rul e 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 55998

affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting U.S. Bank retroact ive relief from

the automatic bankruptcy stay . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d).

We review for an abuse of discretion, Mac Donald v. Mac Donald (In re Mac

Donald) , 755 F.2d 715, 716 (9th Cir. 1985) , and we affirm

.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in granting retroactive

relief from the automatic bankruptcy stay because it properly weighed the Fjelsted

factors and concluded that eleven of the twelve factors weighed in favor of

granting relief. See Fjelsted v. Lien (In re Fj elsted) , 293 B.R. 12, 25 (B.A.P. 9th

Cir. 2003) (setting forth factors to consider in deciding whether to annul an

automatic bankruptcy stay)

. We reject as unsupported by the record Khan’s

contentions that U.S. Bank lied to the bankruptcy court about its knowledge of

Khan’s bankruptcy proceedings or that Khan was prevented from presenting

information to the bankruptcy or district courts

.

We do not consider Khan ’s argument , raised for the first time on appeal, that

the bankruptcy court’s order violated the California Homeowner’s Bill of Rights.

See Smith v. Marsh , 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“ As a general rule, we

will not consider arguments that are raised for the first time on appeal. ”).

Khan’s re quest to supplement the opening brief

, set forth in the opening

brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE UNIFRAX
CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1996
AND THEIR CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                             898
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,433
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,202
<INVENTORY>                                     10,091
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,534
<PP&E>                                          64,113
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  93,391
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,512
<BONDS>                                        127,750
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (54,064)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    93,391
<SALES>                                         91,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,631
<CGS>                                           46,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   69,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   325
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,326
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,246
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 20,183
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,543
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,640
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,640
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<Page>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                                 CERTIFICATIONS
                 PURSUANT TO 18 UNITED STATES CODE Section 1350

       Each of the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the
   quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2004 of
   Allstate Life Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange
   Commission fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in
   such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
   condition and result of operations of Allstate Life Insurance Company.

May 6, 2004                    /s/ Casey J. Sylla
                               ------------------
                               Casey J. Sylla
                               Chairman of the Board and President


                               /s/ Steven E. Shebik
                               --------------------
                               Steven E. Shebik
                               Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

                                       E-5
e REF ID:A71745 

,. qc•~RITYSTP. • ~ ' ~,...ffe 

V"JASHDC 

..... - . -

FROM: SUSLO LONDON 2017¢8Z 

TO: USCIB COORDINATOR 

T 0 P 5 E e R E T 

SECURITY INFORMATION 

2~ FEBRUARY 52/TSM/ 

ROUTINE 

S-58~34 

FOLLOW,~G ANNOUNCEMENT ~AS MALE 13. FEB BY GCHQ: 

"SIR ED!ARD TRAVIS rs RETfRING FROM THE POST OF DfRECTOR, 

GCHQ ON 15 APRIL 1952, BUT WILL ACT IN AN ADVISORY CAPACITY 

TO THE IIRECTOR GENERAL FOR A FEW MONTHSo 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR FOREIGN AFFAiRS HAS DECIDED TO 

APPOINT MftE M JONES TO THE POST OF DIRECTOR,GCHQ IN SUCCESSfON 

TO SIR EDW.ARD TRAVISo" 

ACTroN: AFSA-123 •••••• (12) 

PARAPHRA~E NOT REQU l REDo • 

CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING. 

2017¢az FEB 52 

. . I' ' . I I •' ~ I .'.J '.' ~Ta .... J..· .. •·' ~ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-05-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a