August 1 4 , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Operations, West Building Ground F l oor 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regula tions from 14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b); 91.103(b); 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.405 (a); 91.407(a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.417 (a) & (b).

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the Reform Act) and 14 C. F.R. Part 11, CAM Pacific (CAM), an engineering and construction company, hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) to allow commercial operation of its Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (“sUAS”) for aerial imaging for safety and monitoring of secured and controlled environment construction sites, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the conditions outlined herein or as may be established by the FAA as required by

Section 333.

As detailed in t his document and the attached “ Maintenance and Flight Log ” (Flight Log) , the requested exemption would permit the operation of sUAS under controlled conditions in airspace that is 1) limited 2) predetermined 3) controlled as to access and 4) would provide s afety enhancements to the already best practices safety protocols followed by CAM at each one of its construction sites. Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) respons ibilities to “...establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.” Section 333(c) of the Reform Act.

The name and address of the applicant is:

CAM Pacific 1314 S. King Street, Suite 417 Honolulu, HI 96814

PH: 808

- 593

- 0001

Email: aye @campacific.com

Regulations from which the exemption is requested:

14 C.F.R. Part 21 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b) 14 C.F.R. 61.113 (a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.7 (a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9 (b) (2)

14 C.F.R. 91.103

14 C.F.R. 91.109

14 C.F.R. 91.11914 C.F.R. 91.121 14 C.F.R. 91.151 (a) 14 C.F.R. 91.203 (a) & (b) 14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a) 14 C.F.R. 407 (a) (1) 14 C.F.R. 409 (a) (2) 14 C.F.R. 417 (a) & (b)

I. STATUTORY AUTHORITY FOR EXEMPTIONS

The Federal Aviation Act expressly grants the FAA authority to issue exemptions. This statutory authority includes exempting civil aircraft, as the term is defined under §40101 of the Act, including sUASs, from the requirement that all civil aircraft must have a

curr ent airworthiness certificate.

The Administrator may grant an exemption from a requirement of a regulation prescribed under subsection (a) or (b) of this section or any sections 44702

- 44716 of this title if the Administrator finds the exemption in the pub lic interest. 49 U.S.C. §44701(f) See also 49 USC §44711(a); 49 USC §44704; 14 CFR §91.203(a) (1).

Section 333(b) of the Reform Act assists the Secretary in determining whether sUAS may operate in the National Airspace System (NAS) without creating a haza rd to the user, the public, or a threat to national security. If the Secretary determines that a sUAS “may operate safely in the national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft in the national ai rspace system.” Id . §333(c).

CAM ’s sUAS are multirotor vehicles, weighing 10 or fewer lbs. including payload. They operate under normal conditions at a speed of no more than 50 knots and have the capability to hover, and move in the vertical and horizonta l plane simultaneously. The sUAS will operate only in the Pilot’s visual line of sight at all times and will operate only within the sterile area described in the Flight Log , attached as Exhi bit 1 . Such operations

will insure that the sUAS will “not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public.” Reform Act Section 333 (b).

Given the small size of the sUAS involved and the restricted and sterile environment within which they will operate, our application falls squarely within the z one of safety (an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial operations of sUAS to commence immediately. Also due

to the small size of the sUAS and the low altitudes and restricted areas in wh ich the sUAS will operate, approval of the application presents no national security issue.

Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations, and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, the grant of the requested exemptions is in the public interest. Accordingly, CAM respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemption without d elay.II. PUBLIC INTEREST This exemption application is expressly submitted to fulfill Congress’ goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain unmanned aircraf t systems may operate safely in the NAS before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. By granting an exemption the FAA will fulfill Congress’s intent of allowing UAS to operate with significant safety precautions in low risk environments.

The use of sUAS on a construction site can significantly reduce the risk to workers of falls while inspecting, surveying, or monitoring site progress. sUAS can inspect, photograph, and collect data on hard to get to areas that otherwise would require worker inspection. Falls are a leading source of workplace fatality and injury on construction

sites

, and reducing falls through sUAS use for site imaging could save workers lives.

Additionally, sUAS could replace the use of helicopters and s mall aircraft to monitor sites. The sUAS we propose to fly in this application are under five pounds, and carry no combustible material on board, as opposed to the much larger conventionally powered small aircraft. Shifting to sUAS from helicopters present s a marked safety increase for our workers and the public.

Lastly, sUAS reduce the environmental impact by dramatically decreasing the energy used for aerial imaging and data collection over a construction site. Our sUAS use rechargeable lithium ion batte ries, as opposed to fossil fuels burned in operation of small aircraft that are many hundreds of times heavier.

III. EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY CAM proposes that the exemption requested herein apply to sUAS that have the characteristics and that operate with the limitations listed herein. These limitations provide for at least an equivalent or even higher level of safety to operations under the current regulatory structure because the proposed operations represent a safety enhancement to the already safe protocols followed on construction sites and imaging and surveying operations conducted with helicopters and other conventional aircraft.

CAM will be bound by the following limitations when conducting its sUAS operations under an FAA issued exemption:

1. The sUAS will be less than 10 pounds.

2. Flights will be operated within v isual line of sight of a pilot.

3. Maximum total flight time for each operational flight will be 30 minutes. The UAS calculates battery reserve in real time, and will return to its ground sta tion

with at least 20% battery power reserve should that occur prior to the 30 minute

limit.

4. Flights will normally be operated at an altitude of 200 feet AGL, never exceeding

400 feet AGL.

5. Any site within 5 miles of an airport will not be flown without not ification and approval of the local FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO) and airport

controller.6. Crew for each operation will consist of the sUAS Pilot who will keep the sUAS within his visual line of sight at all times.

7. The sUAS Pilot will be train ed in flight, operations, and safety procedures and as detailed in the DJI Manual.

8. The sUAS will only operate within a confined a rea as defined in this document

and the Flight Log . The F l ight Log also requires the establishment of a “Security

Perimeter” fo r the flight operations area.

9. A briefing will be conducted in regard to the planned sUAS operations prior to each day’s production activities. It will be mandatory that all personnel who will be performing duties within the boundaries of the safety perimet er be present for this briefing.

10. All onsite personnel will consent to the s UAS flyover on site by waiver, and the operator will obtain additional verbal or written consent of all persons who will be allowed within 100 feet of the flight operation.

11. Pilot wi ll have been trained in operation of s UASs generally and received up

- to

date information on the particular s UAS to be operated as required by th is

document

. 12. Written and/or oral permission from the relevant property holders will be

obtained.

13. All required pe rmissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state,

county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies.

14. If the sUAS loses communications or loses its GPS signal, it will have capabili ty

to return to a pre

- determined location within the Security Perimeter and land.

IV. DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC REGULATIONS

14 CFR 61.113 (a) & (b): Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots t o non

- commercial operations. Because the UAS will not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of safety of current operations by requiring the pilot operating the aircraft to have completed a UAS flight trainin g course of 10 hours before flying a UAS. Unlike a conventional aircraft that carries the pilot and passengers, the UAS is remotely controlled with no living thing or cargo on board. The area of operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights are p lanned and coordinated in advance as set forth in this document. The risks associated with the operation of the UAS are so diminished from the level of risk associated with commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that allowing operation s of the UAS as requested with a pilot who has met the minimum requirements of this document exceeds the present level of safety achieved by 14 C.F.R. §61.113 (a) & (b).

14 C.F.R. 91.103: Preflight Action This regulation requires each pilot in command ta ke certain actions before flight to ensure the safety of flight. An exemption is needed from this requirement as the Pilot will take separate preflight actions, including checking for weather conditions, checking flight battery requirements, checking takeo ff and landing distances, and all other actions in thePreflight Checklist in this document and the DJI m anual. These actions will provide an equivalent level of safety.

14 C.F. R. 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (d) allows helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. This exemp tion is for a multirotor craft that flies similarly to a helicopter, with vertical take off and vertical landing, which will typically operate at altitudes of 200 AGL, so an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. The sUAS will never operate at a ltitude higher than 400 AGL and will be in a restricted area with security perimeter, where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre

- obtained consent.

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed of the sUAS as well as the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the property owner or local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and any ons ite personnel as outlined in this docum ent , all affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations. Unlike flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighing far more than the maximum 10 lbs. proposed herein, our sUAS will not carry flammable fuel. In addition, the low

- alti tude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between sUAS operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119.

14 C.F.R. 91.121: Altimeter Settings This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference to an altimeter that is set “...to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.” As the sUAS may not have a barometric altimeter, but instead a GPS altitud e read out, an exemption may be needed. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved b y the operator, pursuant to this document

, confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight.

14 CFR 91.151 (a): Fuel requir ements for flight in VFR conditions Section 91.151 (a) outlines fuel requirements for beginning a flight in VFR conditions. Our sUAS is limited to operations in sterile and controlled environments as outlined in

the this document , and has a limited range and flight time which require an exemption from 14 CFR 91.151(a).

The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 35 minutes of powered flight. To meet the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 CFR §91.151, sUAS flights would be limited to approximatel y 5 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the sUAS’s proposed flight area and the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in daylight or night VFR conditions is reasonable.

CAM believes that an exemption from 14 CFR §91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operatewithout compliance with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small sUAS, in a tightly controlled area where only pe ople and property owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.151(a) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the sm all UAS. Additionally, limiting sUAS flights to 10 minutes would greatly reduce the utility for which the exemption will be granted.

An equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 30 minutes, or enough battery reserve to ensure that the sUAS lands at the ground station with at least 20% of battery power (as determined by the onboard monitoring system and the Pilot), whichever happens first. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS to its planned landing zone fr om anywhere in its limited operating area.

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 10673, and 10808.

14 CFR 91.405 (a); 407 (a)(1); 409 (a)(2); 417 (a) & (b): Maintenance inspections These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner “shall have that aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter...,” and others shall inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. Given that these sections and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these sections will not apply to CAM . Maintenance w ill be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the flight manual and operatin g handbook as referenced in this

document and the DJI Manual. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these small sUAS are very limited in size and will carry a sm all payload and operate only in restricted areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the sUAS can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. As provided

in this document , the Pilot will ensure that the sUAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the Pilot is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the equivalent level of safety.

********** Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal Register, should it be determined that publication is needed: Applicant seeks an exemption from th e following rules: 14 C.F.R. §21, subpart H; 14 C.F.R 45.23(b);14 C.F.R. §§ 61.113( a) & (b);91.7 (a); 91.9 (b) (2);91.103(b);91.109; 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a);91.203(a) and (b); 91.405 (a); 91.407 (a) (1); 91.409 (a) (2); 91.409 (a) (2) and 91.417 (a) & (b) to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55lbs or less) in construction operations.

Approval of exemptions allowing commercial operations of sUAS in the construction industry enhances safety while reducing risk. Manned aircraft monitoring and surveyingcreates a greater risk because the craft are much larger, have combustible fuel, and carry an onboard human pilot. In contrast, a sUAS weighing fewer than 10 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced m ass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights.

The operation of small sUAS, weighing less than 10 lbs., conducted in t he strict conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the requirements of Part 21 and allowing commercial operations. These lightweigh t aircraft operate at slow speeds, close to the ground, and in a sterile environment and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and people.

All flights will oc cur over private or controlled access property with the property owner’s prior consent and knowledge. Images taken will be of individuals who have also consented to being filmed or otherwise have agreed to be in the area where aerial photography will take place.

Satisfaction of the criteria provided in Section 333 of the Reform Act of 2012

-- size, weight, speed, operating capabilities, controlled operating environment and operation within visual line of sight and national security

– provide more than adequa te justification for the grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of applicant’s

sUAS in the construction industry.

Sincerely,

Andrew C. Yee, P.E., PMP Principal

CAM Pacific

Attached: Exhibit 1

– Maintenance and Fl ight Log

Referenced: http://www.dji.comDJI	P hantom 3 -	Maintenance	and	Flight	Log

GENERAL

Project :__________________________________ Date:____________________

Operator:	________________________________ Visual	Observer:	___________________________

Location:	_____________________________________________

AIRCRAFT: Name/Model	No.:________________________

_____________ _ Pre-flight	Inspection:	Yes	No

Aircraft	Maintenance	Status:______________________

Comments:	__________________________________________

_______

WEATHER Ceiling:__________	Visibility:_____________	Winds:_______________

FLIGHT	DETAILS Proximity	to	airport:	_________________	(attach	map	indicating	approximate	location	of	flight)

Airport	notified:	Yes	No	Date:_______________

Time:	_______ _______	Phone	Number:	_______________________

Contact	Name:	__________________________	COA	Requested:___________

Nearest	major	intersection:	____________________________________________________
Proximity	to	local	road:	___________________

_________________ _____________ Proximity	to	s tructure s :	________________________________________________ Approx.	Takeoff	Time	:___________________	Approx.	Landing	Time:______________________

Estimated	Elevation:_______________________

Safety Issues/ Concerns:

Additional	Comments:

P repare d	by :_________

________________ _

Make this available	to	administrator/local	law	enforcement	upon	request.