alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Docket: ED-2012-ICCD-0070

School Attendance Boundary Survey (SABS) 2013 and 2015

Comment On: ED-2012-ICCD-0070-0001

Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request; School Attendance Boundary Survey (SABS) 2013 and 

2015

Document: ED-2012-ICCD-0070-DRAFT-0006

Comment on FR Doc # N/A

Submitter Information

General Comment

I am a GIS user and an educational researcher who works with school attendance boundaries. It is a great idea for IES 

to become a clearinghouse for school zone data so long as it makes the data useable to a wide-range of constituents 

(especially the districts that provide the data). Will the project represent the original information provided by districts 

or will it change the data? I worry that the project will lose boundaries or not pay attention to some of the complexities 

of this type of geography. And the result will be that the project will lose the cooperation of school agencies.

PUBLIC SUBMISSION

As of: February 20, 2013

Received: February 11, 2013

Status: Pending_Post

Category: Institution of Higher Education

Tracking No. 1jx-83mn-9ken

Comments Due: February 19, 2013

Submission Type: Web

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Program Files (x86)\Documentum\CTS\docbases\ProDocbase\config\temp_sessions\5963848521133955... 3/22/2013
• REF ID:A70905 • 

CROSS I1''lElt ~HE T 

Filg under 10. StGJDage of Crypto tquip. J)&.te 28 $ep 49 

Type of Corrsspondenao :I-:-·Di spo s 1 ti on Form 

Subj~ct: Storoge ~pace for SIGSALY 

1' rom: ASI. 

T01 SAGHB 

' Clllsait:i01Ltion:: 

Synogsia: The following justificrtion for retention of Room 

lD 1032 and connecting rooms at The Pentagon as storage 

space for SIGSALY 1s su'trlitted. 

Do Q\ll?\OUt 11 led under lr.i, 

SIGSALY General %1 

C8Gl-S !•orn l'o. 67 Cliff l) 

2' Septaer 1'46 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-02-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

- . . .,t. ¥
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6098
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN DAREN HUGHES, a/k/a Ellis Rasheed Williams, a/k/a L, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CR-91-209-G) Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996 Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John Daren Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence filed under Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Hughes , No. CR-91-209-G (M.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
·-:- - =~ 

REF ID:A487672 

!Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-08-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 
.,,_ 

!.,_ 

I 

~ 

-REF ID.:~A487.672 __ 

HONOWLU ~~AGES 

• • : : DATE : : • • 

FOOH : TO . • if JD# : 19~1 cSTA Ji. . • LOCATION 

• .. : . • • • . . • . Hon :Tokyo :043 : 1842 : 10 liar. : s : Bainbridge Is. , Wash. (navy) 

Hon ::'iash 

Tok :Hon 

Tok :Hon 

Hon :Tok 

Hon :Tok 

Tok :Hon 

.Tok :Hon 

Hon :Tok 

. 

• 

Tok :Hon 

Hon ~Tok 

Hon :Tok 

Hon :Tok 

! 

Hon _:Tok 

. . Hon :Tok 

Hon :Tok 

Hon :Tok 

Hon :Tok 

lion ·:Tok 

Hon :Tok 

. . Tok :Hon 

Tok :Hon 

. . Fa.OM : TO 

: 

Hain :Tok 

Tok :Hsin 

Pek :Tok 

Hsin :Tok 

Tok :Hain 

. . 

:041 . . 57'$) :29 Sept.: x : Photograph (Navy) 

:83 -· . 5696 :24 Sept.: S _: Bainbridge Is. , r:asb. (r;avy) :lll)• 6991 : 15 Nov. • s_ . . . do. 

. :222 : 7lll :18 Hov~ : 2 • Presidio,. San Francisco, Calif. (Army) • 

:224 : 7064 : 18 flov. . . . 2 •do • 

:ll3 : 706.3 : 18 Nov. : s • Bainbridge Is. I riash. (Navy) • 

:lll ;;..-- : 7029 :20 Nov •. : s . . do. 

·:234~1) : 7511 :24 Nov. : 2 . . Presidio, Sap Francisco, Calif. (Arm,y) 

:234 2) . . . • • . . • 

:ll9 : 7158 : 28 liov. . . s : Bainbridge Is., 'i7ash. (fiavy) 

:238 • 7212 :28 !lov. 7 : Fort Runt, Virginia (near \7asbington) (Army) • 

:122. 70S6 : 29 tlov. 

:241.{l) 

:241(2) 

::245(1) 

:245(2) 

:2.47 

:24S 

:249 

:252· 

:253 

:254 

:123 

:128 

: 

• . 

: ~ : 

:781 

:893 

:625 

: -:909 

. . 

. . . . 2 . . Presidio, San Francisco, Ctllit. {Al'mJ"') 

: 7294 : l Dec. : . . do. . . . • : 

: 7370 • 3 nee. • 7 • Fort Runt, Va. (near ::ashingt.on) -· . • 

: . . . • • . . 7'J09 . . . 3 Dec. . ·- 2 Presidio, San francisco, Calif'. 

·• 7310 . 3 Dec. . 2 : do. • . . . 

·• . 7401 : 4 Dec. : 2 do. . 72BO : 5 Dec. . 2 . do. • . . • 

~ 7179 : 6 Dec. 2(1'1'): do. . . 7179 :. 6 Dec. 2(TT): do. . . . . . . . 0007 . . . 2 Dee. 5 : Fort Sha.ft.er, 'l' .n. (Army) . . 7381 : 6 Dec. 5 Fort. Sha.a."'t.er, T .a. (Arm7) 

: : 

~ISCELLANEOUS MESSAGES 

. DATE . . • . . --. 1241 - :STA ·~1 : LCCATIOfl . . M: . . : : . • . 6974 :28 Nov. . 5 . . . . Fort Sha.tter, T.H. . 7092 : l Dec. : 5 : do. -· 

: 7335 : 5 Dec. : 5 do. , 

. • 7369 : 4 Dee. : 5 : do. . 7'JTl : 4 Dec. . 5 do. • . . . . . . . 

The above summary indicates the relative 

unimportance of the Fort. Shatter intercepts. 

(Al'm1') 

(AI'm1') 

(lil'm7) 

-.........~,...,/
EXHIBIT 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Eric A. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of Laser Technology, Inc. (the
"registrant"), certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Laser Technology,
Inc.;

2.      Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

        a)      designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
        material information relating to the registrant, including its
        consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
        entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
        being prepared;

        b)      evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
        disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
        conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
        procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
        such evaluation; and

        c)      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
        most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
        reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
        control over financial reporting; and

5.      The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

        a)      all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
        design or operation of our financial reporting internal controls which
        are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
        record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

        b)      any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
        other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
        controls over financial reporting.

Date:  December 29, 2003


/s/   Eric A. Miller

Eric A. Miller
Chief Executive Officer
Independent Auditors' Consent


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mid-Iowa Financial Corp.:

         We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(No. 33-63038) on Form S-8 of Mid-Iowa Financial Corp. of our report dated
November 13, 1996, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mid-Iowa
Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1996 and 1995, the
related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1996,
which report appears in the September 30, 1996 annual report on Form 10-KSB of
Mid-Iowa Financial Corp. and subsidiaries.



                                        /s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
December 23, 1996
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O . A P - 7 6 , 6 2 3

E X P A R T E A G U S T I N M O R A , A p p l i c a n t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U S E N O . F 0 7 - 7 2 6 9 9 - Q U I N T H E 2 9 1 s t D I S T R I C T C O U R T

F R O M D A L L A S C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O P I N I O N P u rsuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Proced u re , t h e cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y o u n g , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag gra v at ed assault and se ntence d to fifteen year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends, inter alia , that his counsel rende red ineffe ctive assi s t ance beca use he failed to timely

file a notice of appe al. The trial court has deter

mined, based upon the rec ord, that trial counsel failed to timely file

a notice of appea l. We find, there fore , that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-2

t i m e appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. F07- 72699-QU from the 291st J u d i ci al District Court of Dallas County

. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of

appea l so that he may then, wit h the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningf ul appea l. Wit hin ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige n t. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent App l i ca n t o n d irec t appea l. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file

a wr itten notice of a

ppeal in the tria l court within 30 day s after the mandate of this Court issues. The Applica

nt’s rema ining c laims are dismissed. Deliver ed: September

14, 2011 Do Not Publish
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOEL DAVID JOSEPH, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY, INC.; 

et al., 

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16-55742 

D.C. No. 2:15-cv-09399-AB-E 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24, 2017**

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON,

Circuit Judges.

Joel David Joseph appeals pro se from district court’s judgment dismissing 

his diversity action alleging state law claims arising out his purchase of cashew 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Joseph’s request for oral 

argument, set forth in his reply brief, is denied.

FILED

MAY 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-55742 

products without country of origin markings. We have jurisdiction under 28 

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). 

Hinojos v. Kohl’s Corp., 718 F.3d 1098, 1103 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Joseph’s claims under California’s 

Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) because Joseph failed to allege facts sufficient 

to show that he relied on the absence of a country of origin marking on defendants’ 

cashew products in making his purchases. See Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17204 

(standing under the UCL requires plaintiff’s injury to occur “as a result of” 

defendant’s misconduct); Kwikset Corp. v. Super. Ct., 246 P.3d 877, 885-88 (Cal. 

2011) (to establish standing to bring a UCL claim, a plaintiff must allege economic 

injury and reliance on defendant’s alleged misrepresentation).

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents and facts not presented to the district court. 

See United States v. Elias, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts 

not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 24



POWER OF ATTORNEY



KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned constitutes and appoints Kenneth Brizel and Monty K. Allen, and each of them, his true and lawful
attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, and any and all
amendments thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority
to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as might or could be done in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents or either of them, or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed on this 10thday of August, 2004 by the following persons.



|                                              |  |                                            
|--------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------
|/s/    ROBERT RIPPRobert Ripp                 |  | /s/    KENNETH
BRIZELKenneth
Brizel        
|                                              | 
|/s/    JAMES L. ADLER,
JR.James L. Adler,
Jr. |  | /s/    ROBERT BRUGGEWORTHRobert
Bruggeworth
|                                              | 
|/s/    DR. STEVEN R. J.
BRUECKSteve
Brueck    |  | /s/    LOUIS
LEEBURGLouis
Leeburg          
|                                              | 
|/s/    GARY SILVERMANGary Silverman           |  |
o I 

Oeat. ot Ma~erial fToclv.cecl tor AS-22 

•• l&tte7 ht 492 

1. Ceatirain,s ~e~atioa Mt.ween Ir. Bat.te7 aad llr. lsra t..lldw,, the ooat. 

la ._ ha11ra eel .uterl"al: for the work perfolMcl bJ" .A.S-12 for '5•22 t:roa April 

1941, t.o dat.• i• ,,, m:;o. 

-" a. lt 1• uadent.ood that a t.ramter ot hnd5 will be Md• tna JS-22 w 

"'\ ...,. t.e aOYer U• mat.. 

•· "· av:;gc Cid.et, ••terlel 8rar&Gh ' r i .• • I I ., • t 1 - - a •• -.. r 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

!).-t~t/7
REF ID:A66375 

ar .. Johll eooea ~t1onal ha~ -.ChW. ~tJ.on 

~-1e, ...., ton. 

n. Jlstiomtl Seeur1t1 ~ 1a uxtous to be at;le to call qpon 

-1Dent aci.el:ttata -..eh u :J'CNJ'&elt tor part-t~ ..-nlcea or tc:tr 

tfeC1a1 cot1*11)tatioo ill •ttera Gt extreL:.e ~e to the •t1~1 

~. 

M 1w Jut ..tac, tht·Jfationa1 ~1\1 Ai/11UCY ac1utu1c 

Mrl.aGr7 ~ -e;reed to efta'blleh t.brec aetentitie pa.nea ~riDQ 

Ce t1e.l4s ot astbeMt1e•, wltteomt.l.Dtcs.tiou .at elsct%'001t'9· It 1a 

9J!GJpO#e:1 that tonl'IJ. nNti»o ot "9 fURtl• bet wq 1.atftqt.lent W. ' 

that, .. • ,,._,.al rule, penel •nkro 1'e ~ upoc. to ... at tbe 

ipGey O!'l a 1-UvMuel. eoneultarrt. 'Mei& ud tbtn ~ aa ~ <'ft 

ti. Uld. ccm:veut~~ ¥111 per.d.t. t'M problem& iaTol'ted ca=. ute.11 

won oza ~ the •lied -4 raearch levele. 

rou }Ja\"e been Mlecte'i .. a. ,_.1bie ~tor ~nhip Ol3 

ibC!! ~ea Puel, 1fboM a.s:r..n ia Mr. John c. MePati1100., Vice 

Pfte1dent, lt&termt.lonal ~lneas Machines ~tion, ~ Mad1ton 

Ancue 1 ..,., T«k ea, llfW Jon. 

atMe tho ~Y'• 1llDl'k u ldshl)' cl.ue1t'ied1 there are cert&1n 

~· ~- 1D e:=aei:tion vith etrta.hlina &CCUG t.o tJio work .,. Ylth ~he procunant ot ~1. llL ~ .-rticulv cue, U' 

1'0fJ a»rea• wUlt&gn!u to ... tst • in our problem, the !ad.oetri=.· 

t:lon nqutrcd. tar Cle9.l"V.nCe tor kttooal. lec'Uri~ Aae'OC"# mtte:re con -~be M~li9~ .. JWr t:S.nt arri"rel. a.t t.hls ~· 

tt JaQ we J.at~ la .. n!DS on~ ~l, plee.N ae-eept ci. ll05ldnatlon. vith '\M ~ tM't ~ a.au~ cu \Kl a ml 

GQ'Ctr:1but1on to tbe at.t10Dal 4eteiwe. 

u.:tn 3. CAID'S 

!Jeutem.nt Oenel"a.l, te Mii:!/ 

8lraetor 

SEE ATrACHED SHEET FCR M/R AND DISPOSITION 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF ID:A66375 'c 

i~ 

Letter to Mr. John Coombs Serial: 

M/R: - Invi~tion '/:or menibershtp on the ElectJ:onics Pa.uel or the NSASAB. -

Mr. Coombs (and below listed nominees} was nominated ror membership at 

the l.5-16 Oct l3oard meeting. Thee indiv1duala have been cleared but 

not :lndoctrine.ted.. EBYoung/S/ASST/6o493/zr Jan 54 

Identical letters sent to: 

Pro:f"esaor J. Forrester 

Dir. 1 Digi ta.l Computer I.&b. 

Masa. Institute of Tech. 

211 Ma.ss. Ave • 

Cambridge 39, Mass. 

• Serial: ~ L'-'" D ...... ~ 

Mr. John tr.award • Serial: l;" ':)" I 

Burroughs Ad.ding Ma.chine Co. ~esearch Div. \ Jll -i ~- BrOa.d St. t 

~l&. 23, P&. 

Mr. Ralph L. Palmer - ~erial: ~ S-:2-

IBM Corp. . 

IBM I.abs. ""-1 ~ Poua;hkeepsie, K.Y. 

cc: All 

c/s 

S/ ASST {Mr. Friedman
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL, INC. AND ATKINSON & MULLEN TRAVEL II, LLC T/A APPLE VACATIONS, Respondents

v. JOHN J. O'BRIEN, III, O'BRIEN & O'BRIEN, LLP, O'BRIEN & O'BRIEN ASSOCIATES, LOUIS TUCKER, JACQUELINE TUCKER AND CHRISTINA TUCKER, Petitioners : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : No. 377 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 21st day of January, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED

.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texland Drilling
Program-1981, LTD, (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the "Report"),
I, Jerry N. Namy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
               or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.




/s/ Jerry N. Namy
---------------------
Jerry N. Namy
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
**Exhibit 23.2**

***CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM***

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-105414, No. 333-111270,No. 333-161881 and No. 333-165661) and Form S-8 (No. 333-22217, No. 333-41754, No. 333-53380, No. 333-75060, No. 333-111275 , No. 333-121375, No. 333-139064, No. 333-148458 and No. 333-164846) ofOverland Storage, Inc. of our report dated September 9, 2009, except for the last paragraph of Note 9, as to which the date is December 8, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10–K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

San Diego, California 

September 23, 2010
EXHIBIT 32

Texland Drilling Program-1981, Ltd.

(A Limited Partnership)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texland
Drilling Program-1981, LTD, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the Report), we, Jerry N. Namy, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, and M. E. Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Jerry N. Namy      
|    |  | Jerry N. Namy          
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | August 14, 2007        
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ M. E. Chapman      
|    |  | M. E. Chapman          
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | August 14, 2007
Exhibit 32.2

Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, Robert Bowker, Chief Financial Officer of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, based upon a review of this Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and, except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent report:



| |  |  | this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hungarian Telephone and
Cable Corp.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Robert BowkerRobert Bowker Chief Financial Officer  February 29, 2008