15050 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices 

17The Exchange also represents that it has 

already informed its Members that it will 

implement the proposed rule change on March 23, 

2015, a date that was determined based upon the 

effective date of a prior version of this filing. See 

BZX and BYX Regulatory Circular 15–003, Front 

Running of Block Transactions, dated February 24, 

2015. 

18For purposes only of waiving the 30-day 

operative delay, the Commission has considered the 

proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, 

and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 19 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

transaction in violation of proposed 

Rule 12.14 during what would be the 

operative delay period.17 The Exchange 

also represents that waiver of the 

operative delay would allow it to 

promptly incorporate Rule 12.14 into 

the 17d–2 Agreement, further reducing 

duplicative regulation of Exchange 

Members that are also members of 

FINRA. In addition, the Exchange states 

that waiving the operative delay would 

provide greater harmonization among 

Exchange, EDGA, EDGX, and FINRA 

rules, resulting in less burdensome and 

more efficient regulatory compliance for 

Members and facilitating FINRA’s 

performance of its regulatory functions 

under the 17d–2 Agreement in a 

timelier manner. Based on the foregoing, 

the Commission believes that waiver of 

the operative delay is consistent with 

the protection of investors and the 

public interest. Accordingly, the 

Commission hereby waives the 30-day 

operative delay and designates the 

proposal operative upon filing.18

At any time within 60 days of the 

filing of the proposed rule change, the 

Commission summarily may 

temporarily suspend such rule change if 

it appears to the Commission that such 

action is necessary or appropriate in the 

public interest, for the protection of 

investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 

the purposes of the Act. If the 

Commission takes such action, the 

Commission shall institute proceedings 

to determine whether the proposed rule 

should be approved or disapproved. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an email to rule-comments@

sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– 

BYX–2015–13 on the subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Secretary, Securities and Exchange 

Commission, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549–1090. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–BYX–2015–13. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if email is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for Web site viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., 

Washington, DC 20549 on official 

business days between the hours of 

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such 

filing also will be available for 

inspection and copying at the principal 

offices of the Exchange. All comments 

received will be posted without change; 

the Commission does not edit personal 

identifying information from 

submissions. You should submit only 

information that you wish to make 

available publicly. All submissions 

should refer to File Number SR–BYX– 

2015–13, and should be submitted on or 

before April 10, 2015. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.19

Brent J. Fields, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06362 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 9064] 

Culturally Significant Objects Imported 

for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Arctic 

Ambitions: Captain Cook and the 

Northwest Passage’’ 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the 

following determinations: Pursuant to 

the authority vested in me by the Act of 

October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 

2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 

27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and 

Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 

2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et 

seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of 

October 1, 1999, and Delegation of 

Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 

(and, as appropriate, Delegation of 

Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I 

hereby determine that the objects to be 

included in the exhibition ‘‘Arctic 

Ambitions: Captain Cook and the 

Northwest Passage,’’ imported from 

abroad for temporary exhibition within 

the United States, are of cultural 

significance. The objects are imported 

pursuant to loan agreements with the 

foreign owners or custodians. I also 

determine that the exhibition or display 

of the exhibit objects at the Anchorage 

Museum at Rasmuson Center, 

Anchorage, Alaska, from on or about 

March 27, 2015, until on or about 

September 7, 2015, the Washington 

State History Museum, Tacoma, 

Washington, from on or about October 

16, 2015, until on or about January 10, 

2016, and at possible additional 

exhibitions or venues yet to be 

determined, is in the national interest. 

I have ordered that Public Notice of 

these Determinations be published in 

the Federal Register. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information, including a list of 

the imported objects, contact the Office 

of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of 

State, SA–5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 

5H03), Washington, DC 20522–0505. 

Dated: March 17, 2015. 

Kelly Keiderling, 

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau 

of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 

Department of State. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06421 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Highway Administration 

Environmental Impact Statement: 

Orange County and Riverside County, 

California 

AGENCY: Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of intent. 

SUMMARY: The FHWA, on behalf of the 

California Department of Transportation 

(Caltrans), is issuing this notice to 

advise the public that a Supplemental 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

(Supplemental Draft EIS) will be 

prepared for a proposed highway project 

in Orange County and Riverside County, 

California. The original Notice of Intent 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 54 / Friday, March 20, 2015 / Notices 15051 

was published on October 22, 1986 and 

revised on March 16, 1988. 

DATES: The deadline for comments is 

Monday, April 13, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Smita Deshpande; 3347 Michelson 

Drive, Suite 100; Irvine, CA 92612; (949) 

724–2245; D12.NOP241.91@dot.ca.gov; 

Chief, Division of Environmental 

Analysis. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Effective 

July 1, 2007, the Federal Highway 

Administration (FHWA) assigned, and 

the California Department of 

Transportation (Caltrans) assumed, 

environmental responsibilities for this 

project pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. 

Caltrans as the assigned National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) 

agency, in cooperation with the United 

States Fish and Wildlife Service and 

United States Army Corps of Engineers, 

will prepare a Supplemental Draft EIS 

on a proposal for a median-to-median 

connector between State Route 241 (SR– 

241) and the State Route 91 (SR–91) 

Express Lanes, project in Orange County 

and Riverside County, California. 

The proposed median-to-median 

connector project encompasses 12– 

ORA–241 (PM 36.1/39.1), 12–ORA–91 

(PM 14.7/18.9), and 08–RIV–91 (PM 0.0/ 

1.5) for a length of approximately 8.7 

miles. Anticipated federal approvals 

include an FHWA Air Quality 

Conformity Determination, Biological 

Opinion Amendment and permits under 

Section 404 and 401 of the Clean Water 

Act. 

Caltrans District 12, in cooperation 

with the Foothill/Eastern Transportation 

Corridor Agency (F/ETCA), proposes to 

construct the median-to-median 

connector from State Route 241 (SR– 

241) to the State Route 91 (SR–91) 

Express Lanes. The proposed median-tomedian connector is phase 2 of the 

Eastern Transportation Corridor (ETC) 

project previously approved in 1994. It 

will provide improved access between 

SR–241 and SR–91 and is proposed to 

be a tolled facility. Caltrans will be the 

lead agency for the project. The United 

States Army Corps of Engineers and the 

United States Fish and Wildlife Service 

were identified as cooperating agencies 

in the corresponding 1991 ETC Draft EIS 

and 1994 ETC Final EIS. 

The SR–241/SR–91 Express Lane 

Connector was originally evaluated as a 

SR–241/SR–91 high-occupancy vehicle 

(HOV) direct connector in the 1991 ETC 

Draft EIS and 1994 ETC Final EIS (both 

of which studied a broader project area 

with improvements on SR–133, SR–241 

and SR–261). The Systems Management 

Concept (SMC) for the ETC project 

proposed that the project would be 

staged, incorporating general purpose 

traffic and eventually HOV lanes, to 

meet the forecasted demand. Under the 

SMC, ETC construction would be 

completed in one stage with three or 

more phases. 

To implement Phase 2 of the ETC 

project, a Supplemental Draft EIS is 

being prepared to focus on the eastern 

portion of the original project and to 

address changes to environmental 

conditions and regulatory requirements. 

Various alternatives were studied in the 

1991 ETC Draft EIS and 1994 ETC Final 

EIS; however, the Supplemental Draft 

EIS will include a No Build and one 

Build Alternative for the median-tomedian connector only. 

Letters describing the proposed action 

and soliciting comments will be sent to 

appropriate Federal, State, cooperating 

agencies, participating agencies, local 

agencies, and to private organizations 

and citizens who have previously 

expressed or are known to have interest 

in this proposal. Environmental Review 

of the project is anticipated to occur 

from 2015 through 2017. A public 

scoping meeting is not scheduled at this 

time; should you be interested, please 

let us know in writing. A public hearing 

will be held in 2016. Public notice will 

be given of the time and place of the 

hearing. The Supplemental Draft EIS 

will be available for public and agency 

review and comment prior to the public 

hearing. 

To ensure that the full range of issues 

related to this proposed action are 

addressed and all significant issues 

identified, comments, and suggestions 

are invited from all interested parties. 

Comments or questions concerning this 

proposed action and the Supplemental 

Draft EIS should be directed to Caltrans 

at the address provided above. 

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning 

and Construction. The regulations 

implementing Executive Order 12372 

regarding intergovernmental consultation on 

Federal programs and activities apply to this 

program.) 

Issued on: March 16, 2015. 

Shawn Oliver, 

Team Leader, Right of Way and Environment, 

Federal Highway Administration, 

Sacramento, California. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06415 Filed 3–19–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–22–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

National Highway Traffic Safety 

Administration 

Petition for Exemption From the 

Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention 

Standard; BMW of North America, LLC 

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration (NHTSA), 

Department of Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Grant of petition for exemption. 

SUMMARY: This document grants in full 

the BMW of North America, LLC (BMW) 

petition for an exemption of the X1 

multi-purpose vehicle line (MPV) in 

accordance with 49 CFR part 543, 

Exemption from the Theft Prevention 

Standard. This petition is granted 

because the agency has determined that 

the antitheft device to be placed on the 

line as standard equipment is likely to 

be as effective in reducing and deterring 

motor vehicle theft as compliance with 

the parts-marking requirements of 49 

CFR part 541, Federal Motor Vehicle 

Theft Prevention Standard (Theft 

Prevention Standard). BMW requested 

confidential treatment for specific 

information in its petition that the 

agency will address by separate letter. 

DATES: The exemption granted by this 

notice is effective beginning with the 

2016 model year (MY). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. 

Carlita Ballard, Office of International 

Policy, Fuel Economy and Consumer 

Programs, National Highway Traffic 

Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., West Building, Room W43– 

439, Washington, DC 20590. Ms. 

Ballard’s telephone number is (202) 

366–5222. Her fax number is (202) 493– 

2990. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a 

petition dated November 21, 2014, 

BMW requested an exemption from the 

parts-marking requirements of the Theft 

Prevention Standard for the X1 MPV 

vehicle line beginning with MY 2016. 

The petition requested an exemption 

from parts-marking pursuant to 49 CFR 

part 543, Exemption from Vehicle Theft 

Prevention Standard, based on the 

installation of an antitheft device as 

standard equipment for the entire 

vehicle line. 

Under 49 CFR 543.5(a), a 

manufacturer may petition NHTSA to 

grant an exemption for one vehicle line 

per model year. BMW stated that its X1 

MPV line will be replacing its X1 

passenger car line beginning with MY 

2016. In its petition, BMW provided a 

detailed description and diagram of the 

identity, design, and location of the 

components of the antitheft device for 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES