alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Air T, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
Clark, Chief Executive Officer, and John Parry, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.











Date:  October
31, 2008











/s/ Walter
Clark


Walter
Clark


Chief
Executive Officer














/s/ John
Parry


John
Parry


Chief
Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996             MAR-31-1995
<CASH>                                           9,220                  12,398
<SECURITIES>                                       954                   7,729
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,259                  29,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,547                   5,636
<INVENTORY>                                      3,311                   3,664
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,363                  67,405
<PP&E>                                          41,190                  39,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,715                  25,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,679                 106,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,195                  57,871
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           186                     186
<OTHER-SE>                                      44,505                  44,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,679                 106,309
<SALES>                                         25,463                  35,031
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,932                  40,349
<CGS>                                            2,698                   4,480
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,885                  30,822
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (248)                   (486)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  21                       8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    576                   5,525
<INCOME-TAX>                                       207                   1,968
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                369                   3,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       369                   3,557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02                    0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02                    0.20


</TABLE>
• REF ID:A71333 • 

.AS-SO AS-62 l Jul 48 

Attnr Llr .. r:. armm . D1epos1 tion ot Cryptographic Dev.lees 

Reference' cur recent teloccn, tl?e f cllowing iteJ!lS are on he.nd at this Station 

and are being cenaidered as a:cess: 

6E438A Cipher Device fJ-138-A 1 ea 

Ceyptam.t~tie Device :1•1l2 S ea 

li.agelin erntograi:her C-38 

w/instract.S.cm books aDd 

cipher key., serial nos146411467 ,1472,1466 ~ 1468 5 ea 

Eagelin Cryptogra:p!ler t:-3& 

serial nos- 1478, 1480, 

1484 and 1485 4 ca 

Ile.quest inf'ormation as to whether or not "t'hese items ere of value to retain 

in stock. 

/s/ J. r;. :'ood 

J. E. t:DOD 

Cajor, Q:ID 

Chief, Supply Br&ch 

IJgt 1# 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

'A> -.-'I !l 

:~~ I;''"' !,I' I 1' 

1 
REF ID:A71333 

D1apos1U. of ~o Devices 

Dr. Bram id '88 

1. fte fo1J.odaa intoneUon ill regard to the indicated .d"mcee 11 tamiabala 

Bo Valae 

llo Val'Q8 

lfo v.i. 

Sldp toa IS-93-D 

fAaptaSD 

~ 

'ilcCartbJ' 

OJ"tleer 

2. Tbe t.t.ne 4meea that. an indicated •• mttnc no wlue an m\ claeaifted 

ud d11pcelt1.on 887 1'e •de ot theae in e-ceordanoe vitb mst..tng SDatncUou. 

-\-

'I r u· \ 

' 

A. SIJIOV 

Chief, Seeari\J !>lneion 

. 

\ ..._, 

I•-

! 

2
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

November 17, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00905-CV

HARRIS COUNTY, TX, Appellant

V.

GASPAR ORLANDO GARCIA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2016-16976

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an interlocutory appeal from an order signed November 1, 2016. On

November 14, 2016, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and Donovan.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 98-60740

___________________________

RAMON A. GARCIA; BERTHA E. GARCIA,

Petitioners-Appellants,

VERSUS

COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,

Respondent-Appellee.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States Tax Court

(21532-95)

___________________________________________________

July 22, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The decision of the United States Tax Court is affirmed, for

the reasons stated in the tax court's Memorandum Findings of Fact

and Opinion, T.C. Memo. 1998-203 (June 3, 1998).

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-10083

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DILLON ALEX STEELE, also known as Dillon Steele,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:15-CR-1-1

Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dillon Alex Steele appeals his 77-month career offender guideline 

sentence for mailing a threatening communication in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 876(c). He argues that the career offender enhancement in U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 

does not apply because his offense of conviction is not a crime of violence under 

U.S.S.G. § 4B1.2(a). 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-10083 Document: 00513763790 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2016
No. 16-10083

2

First, Steele contends, as he did in the district court, that even if § 876(c) 

is narrowed under the modified categorical approach, his § 876(c) offense does 

not involve the kind of violent force that § 4B1.2(a)(1) requires. We held 

otherwise in United States v. Stoker, 706 F.3d 643, 648 & n.4 (5th Cir. 2013). 

Steele fails to show on de novo review that the holding in Stoker violated our 

rule of orderliness, see United States v. Traxler, 764 F.3d 486, 489 (5th Cir. 

2014), or was dicta, see Stoker, 706 F.3d at 658 (explaining that the holding 

affected the offense level under § 4B1.1(b)). 

Steele raises additional arguments for the first time on appeal, which we 

review for plain error. See United States v. Chavez-Hernandez, 671 F.3d 494, 

497-99 (5th Cir. 2012). He argues that § 876(c) is no longer amenable to 

modified categorical analysis as it is not divisible, in light of Mathis v. United 

States, 136 S. Ct. 2243 (2016), and that § 876(c) does not categorically satisfy 

the force prong in § 4B1.2(a)(1). We decline to address the divisibility of 

§ 876(c) after Mathis because, in any event, Steele fails to show that it is clear 

or obvious that § 876(c) does not categorically satisfy § 4B1.2(a)(1). See United 

States v. Miller, 665 F.3d 114, 136 (5th Cir. 2011). Another circuit has held 

that § 876(c) has the threatened use of physical force as an element. United 

States v. Haileselassie, 668 F.3d 1033, 1035 (8th Cir. 2012) (interpreting 18 

U.S.C. § 16). Because Steele does not show plain error in the application of 

§ 4B1.2(a)(1), we do not address his claims that the residual clause in 

§ 4B1.2(a)(2) is unconstitutionally vague and that it does not support the 

career offender enhancement.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 16-10083 Document: 00513763790 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2016
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We have issued our report dated February 22, 2002,except for Note A as to which
the date is April 15, 2002, accompanying the financial statements included in
the Annual Report of Ortec International, Inc. on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
report in the Registration Statements of Ortec International Inc. on Forms S-3
(File No. 333-42850 effective August 23, 2000, File No. 333-46352, effective
September 29, 2000, File No. 333-52019, effective May 7, 1998 and File No.
333-80979, effective October 14, 1999) and on Forms S-8 (File No. 333-47671,
effective March 10, 1998 and File No. 333-80799, effective June 16, 1999).

GRANT THORNTON LLP

New York, New York
April 15, 2002
EXHIBIT 23


                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-66218) pertaining to the 1992 Employee Incentive Stock Option Plan,
1992 Stock Option Plan for Nonemployee Directors and 1993 Stock Option Plan of
Funco, Inc. and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 33-76800) of
Funco, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report dated May 12, 1998, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Funco, Inc.
included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 29, 1998.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
June 24, 1998
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY 

2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD 

ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

 

 OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION

MEMORANDUM

 

SUBJECT: October 13, 2009 Teleconference with Delphi 

FROM: Brian Nelson 

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0472 

DATE: March 15, 2010 

______________________________________________________________________________ 

On October 13, 2009, from 4-to-5 p.m., we had a teleconference meeting with Delphi to discuss 

air conditioning-related topics in the September 28, 2009 Proposed Rulemaking To Establish 

Light-Duty Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy. Topics 

included a general discussion of credits for reducing refrigerant leakage, credits for improving air 

conditioning system efficiency, and the A/C CO2 Idle Test. 

Attendees from Delphi were: 

Timothy Craig 

Prasad Kadle 

Mingyu Wang 

Mark Zima 

Attendees from EPA were: 

Ed Nam 

Brian Nelson
Update - El Dorado Disposal and Rack It Truck Racks Permits

Adam Baughman to: Stanley Tong 02/22/2012 04:28 PM

History: This message has been replied to.

Hi Stanley,

It appears Rack It only emitted 1,400 lbs of VOC last year, not where near the 6+ tons the permit 

allows.

Additionally, El Dorado Disposal only emitted 0.24 and 0.28 tons in the two previous years even 

though their permit allows for 10 tons.

Adam Baughman

Air Quality Engineer

El Dorado County Air Quality Mgmt District

330 Fair Lane

Placerville, CA, 95667

(530) 621-5323

On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Adam Baughman <adam.baughman@edcgov.us> wrote:

Hi Stanley,

Got your voice message. Attached are the two permits.

From what I know of these facilities (and I've only been here since June).

El Dorado Disposal paints their containers/dumpsters

Rack It Truck Racks uses both powder coating and painting to paint their truck racks. Their 

permit says Automotive Refinishing but I don't think the racks are considered to be automotive 

because they are not the body of the vehicle.

Let me know if you need more info.

Adam Baughman

Air Quality Engineer

El Dorado County Air Quality Mgmt District

330 Fair Lane

Placerville, CA, 95667

(530) 621-5323

NOTICE: This e-mail and any files transmitted with it may contain 

confidential information, and are intended solely for the use of 

the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. 

Any retransmission, dissemination or other use of the 

information by persons other than the intended recipient or 

entity is prohibited.

 If you receive this e-mail in error please contact the sender by 

return e-mail and delete the material from your system. 

Thank you.
_ __ ____ - Sccimty lnlor'2U( ulJ?M~B~3 illcr/) 

CLASSIFIED/NON-CLASSIFIED TRANSMITTAL and RCCEIPT 

EOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY NATIONAL SECUR,TY AGENCY 

Wa:Jlungton 2$, D C 

TO Mr. W. F. Friedman Serial or control number 

Sf ASST DIRIIBA 

Date 

2J. October J.954 

It 1s requested that receipt for this material be acknowledged by executing and returning the below receipt 

2 llS letter may be downgraded to ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ when enclosures are removed 

lnclosures 

Information on VISHINSKIJ Speech of lO September +954 Concerning Charge of Soviet 

Attack on u.s. Navy Aircraft. 

Four Incle 

l. New York Times, Late City Edition, ll September 1954, pp. 1-J.8 

2. Foreign Broadcast Information Service, DaiJ.y Report, USSR and Eastern Europe 

13 September J.954 P• BB 4 OFFICIAL USE ONLY 

3. United Nations Security Council, Verbatim Record of' the Six Hundred and 

Eightieth ?ieeting Held in New York on 10 September J.954 S/PV .680, 

:J-0 September 1954 UNCLASSIFIED 

4. United Nations Security Council, Letter Dated J.O September 1954 from the 

Representative of the USSR Addressed to the President of the Security 

Council S/32887 10 September 1954 UNCLASSIFIED 

pproved for Release by NSA on 08-12-2013 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 

Signature 
REF ID:A58031
REF ID:A521643 .. 

IU THE UNITED STATES P.!\TENT OFFICE 

IN REa Application of * 

WILLIAM F. F'fUEDPAN 

Serial Number 

1<11,21./+ 

Filed * 

23 October 1936 

* For 

CRYPTOGRA.FUS * 

* * * * * * * * * * 

TO: 'the Honorable Commissioner of Patents 

Viashington 251 D. c. 

Sir: 

Division 53 ~\ 

1\,9)-- ~\~ . /j (,,.~ 

'!lo f'\ 

This is in reGponse to Patent Office act:i.on of 2 May 1944. 

The case is being prosecuted l.lllder the three-year rule. 

Please amend the application as follows: 

IN THE CLAIMS 1 

Cl.aim .3, line g - Cancel 11 electrlca.lly11 • 

Claim 9, line 2 .. Co.noel "electrically". 

Claim 10, line 8 - Cancel the amendment of 24 AugllSt 19" 

and insert .. and substantially aperioc11c - • 

Claim 15, lina 3 - After "positions" insert - responsive to 

movements or a similar plurality or camm1ng 

members - • 

Please add the following claims: 

1 

t"pproved for Release by NSA on 11-21-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 
REF ID:A521643 

16. The Tllethod. of f'.!onf;rolli11g th0 Mgl tlnl' dfapl.acements 

of a pl~.llty of rct..,.table commutators or the like. by means 

or a similar plnra.ll ty or ro·ta. table cnmrnlne rneml)crs which includes the stop Qf simultaneously rotating so.id crumnillg members 

step lry- step through indj_vir1.un.lly differeni; angular cJ.iotances. 

17. The method of controlling th.e anguln.r displacements 

of a plurality of rota.table eomrnttt.:~tors in response to a plurality of camming membe!'s which includes the step of combining 

the effects of a.t lennt t1170 crunming members and utilizing such 

combined effects to control such displacements. 

REMARKS 

Al though the Patent Office action. or 2 May 1944 was said 

to be a final rejeetion, it is respect.fully sul)mitted that no 

true issue has been !"eached a.M., therefore, ·J)vi:t. t.he fina.l rejection was premature. 

It a~ara thnt proper protection of' the j_rrvention herein 

requires one or moro method claims. Claim 15 has, therefore, 

been amended, and 1..n its present condition it is believed to 

avoid the rejection based on f\mctionnlity. 

" 

New Claims 16 ru1d 17 also are method claim~, no. 16 being 

directed to the step of controlling the commutators according to 

"' 

the preferred embodiment of the invention and Cla.im 17 being 

directed to the modification of Figure 2. The cla.ims appear to 

be patent.ably distinct from the cited references. 

The amendment to Claim 3 eliminates the Exam.inerts objection 

ot indefiniteness based on the "eleetrical" association of" ~ertain. 

elements. The :further rejection on allowable Claim 4 is queried 

since Claim 4 reads specifica~ upon Figure 2, whereas Claim 3 1s 

not limited to a structure involving plural sets of camming elements. 

2 
REF ID:A521643 

The amendment;:: t.o Clo.im.s 9 and 10 are rele.tivel.y minor and 

are believed to he self.-explaru:ttory in view or the Examiner's 

objections to the:.:ie cltdms. 

Continued promicution tmdor the t~oc•yonr rule is desired. 

Withdrawal or the fj.nal rejection and reconsideration of the 

application are reriuested. 

nespectfUlJ_y, 

WILI,!Ar.~ F. :rnnmr.t~N, Applicant 

By------------ His Attorney 

3
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 106 (Monday, June 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 33090]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13049]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

[Public Notice 2013-0030]

Application for Final Commitment for a Long-Term Loan or 
Financial Guarantee in Excess of $100 Million: AP087980XX

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the United States.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice is to inform the public, in accordance with 
Section 3(c)(10) of the Charter of the Export-Import Bank of the United 
States (``Ex-Im Bank''), that Ex-Im Bank has received an application 
for final commitment for a long-term loan or financial guarantee in 
excess of $100 million (as calculated in accordance with Section 
3(c)(10) of the Charter). Comments received within the comment period 
specified below will be presented to the Ex-Im Bank Board of Directors 
prior to final action on this Transaction.
    Reference: AP087980XX.

Purpose and Use

    Brief description of the purpose of the transaction:
    To support the export of U.S. manufactured commercial aircraft to 
Australia.
    Brief non-proprietary description of the anticipated use of the 
items being exported:
    To be used for long-haul passenger service from Australia to other 
countries.
    To the extent that Ex-Im Bank is reasonably aware, the item(s) 
being exported may be used to produce exports or provide services in 
competition with the exportation of goods or provision of services by a 
United States industry.

Parties

Principal Supplier: The Boeing Company
Obligor: Qantas Airways Limited

Description of Items Being Exported

Boeing 787 aircraft

    Information On Decision: Information on the final decision for this 
transaction will be available in the ``Summary Minutes of Meetings of 
Board of Directors'' on http://exim.gov/newsandevents/boardmeetings/board/.
    Confidential Information: Please note that this notice does not 
include confidential or proprietary business information; information 
which, if disclosed, would violate the Trade Secrets Act; or 
information which would jeopardize jobs in the United States by 
supplying information that competitors could use to compete with 
companies in the United States.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 28, 2013 to be 
assured of consideration before final consideration of the transaction 
by the Board of Directors of Ex-Im Bank.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted through Regulations.gov at 
WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV. To submit a comment, enter EIB-2013-0030 under the 
heading ``Enter Keyword or ID'' and select Search. Follow the 
instructions provided at the Submit a Comment screen. Please include 
your name, company name (if any) and EIB-2013-0030 on any attached 
document.

Cristopolis A. Dieguez,
Program Specialist, Office of the General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2013-13049 Filed 5-31-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

KEITH EUGENE RASKA

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No s . 4D 19

- 2968, 4D20

- 324

[ May 14, 2020 ]

Consolidated a ppeal s from orders denying rule 3.800 and 3.850

motions from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Laura Johnson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 502009CF000393

- AXXX

- MB

.

Keith Eugene Raska, Live Oak, pro se.

No appearance required for ap pellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

M AY
, C IKLIN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Docket No: FAA - 2015 - 3139 Dir ID: 2012 - NM - 139 - AD