alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 13**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Smedvig asa, a company incorporated under the laws of the Kingdom of Norway (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’sknowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December31, 2004 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)**

 

Pursuant to section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Smedvig asa, a company incorporated under the laws of the Kingdom of Norway (the“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 
/S/ ALF C. THORKILDSEN
Alf C. Thorkildsen

Group Chief Financial Officer

June 24, 2005

 

The foregoing certification isbeing furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.2

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Laurence Winoker and Glenn P. Dickes or any of them, each acting alone, his true
and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him
and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the
REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 (the "Form 10-K") under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of
the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the
Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 14th
day of March, 2000.

                                            /s/ DONALD G. DRAPKIN
                                            ---------------------
                                                DONALD G. DRAPKIN
-8 

SIGNAL SEcuRITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 211, D. C. 

SPSIS-3 30 August 45 

SUBJECT: SecuritJ' of Allied Ciphers 

' TO: Chief, Securit7 Division 

Attention is invited to the attached British report 

on the above-mentioned subject. It is desired that a 

summar7 be prepared giving Signal Securit7 Agenc7 1s efforts 

in this field. 

BY COMMABD OF BRIGADIER GENERAL CORDERMAB: 

1 Incl: 

Memo to Gens. Clarke & 

Corderman, above subj., dtd 25 Aug 45, with one 

enclosUl'e. 

MAR1t RHOADS 

Assistant Director of 

Communications Research
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05983]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 24b-1. SEC File No. 270-205; OMB Control No. 3235-0194.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management 
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the 
existing collection of information provided for in the following rule: 
Rule 24b-1 (17 CFR 240.24b-1).
    Rule 24b-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a 
et seq.) requires a national securities exchange to keep and make 
available for public inspection a copy of its registration statement 
and exhibits filed with the Commission, along with any amendments 
thereto.
    There are 18 national securities exchanges that spend approximately 
one half hour each complying with this rule, for an aggregate total 
compliance burden of 9 hours per year. The staff estimates that the 
average cost per respondent is $65.18 per year, calculated as the costs 
of copying ($13.97) plus storage ($51.21), resulting in a total cost of 
compliance for the respondents of $1,173.24.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it 
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information 
collection at the following Web site: www.reginfo.gov. Comments should 
be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of 
Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office Building, 
Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8edde6efe9fbe8faefd1cfe6e3ebeacee1e3eca0ebe1fea0e9e1f8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4a19222b2d3f2c3e2b150b22272f2e0a252728642f253a642d253c">[email protected]</span></a>; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief 
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi 
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or by sending an 
email to: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ecbcbeadb3a18d85808e8394ac9f898fc28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="326260736d7f535b5e505d4a724157511c555d44">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 
30 days of this notice.

    Dated: March 10, 2015.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05983 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Efrain Lopez, * From the 345th District

 Court of Travis County,

 Trial Court No. D-1-GN-10-001042.

Vs. No. 11-11-00102-CV * April 11, 2013

Los Cielos Homeowners Association, Inc., * Memorandum Opinion by Wright, C.J.

 (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

 McCall, J., and Willson, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no error in the 

judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, the judgment of the trial court 

is in all things affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50514 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee
v. ELIGIO OJEDA-GONZALEZ, also known as Mi guel Reynosos-Gonzalez, also known as Javier Dominguez-Arias Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1438-ALL Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing theJudgment in a Criminal Case, EligioOjeda-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. See United Statesv. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November 8, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-50514

2 Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and thejudgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies that to his knowledge the quarterly reporton Form 10-Q for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2009 of AllstateLife Insurance Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresult of operations of Allstate Life Insurance Company.

 

 

May 12,2009

 
|   | /s/ George E. Ruebenson                            |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | George E. Ruebenson                                |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer              |
|   |                                               |
|   |                                               |
|   | /s/ John C. Pintozzi                               |
|   | John C. Pintozzi                                   |
|   | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |

 

E-5

----
EXHIBIT 32(a)

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



I
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-KSB of Harbor Bankshares Corporation, (the
Corporation) for the annual period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|    |  |                                                                               |  |  |  |  |  |               
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | --------------
|    |  |                                                                               |  | 
|By: |  | /s/ Joseph Haskins, Jr.                                                       |  |  |  |  |  | March 21, 2005
|    |  | Joseph Haskins, Jr. President and Chief Executive Officer Joseph Haskins, Jr. |  |  |  |  |  | Date
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 
 MCG Capital Corporation 
 2011 Retention Program 

On August 1, 2011, the Board of Directors of MCG Capital Corporation (“MCG” or the “Company”) approved the MCG Capital
Corporation 2011 Retention Program (the “2011 Retention Program”) for the benefit of the Company’s employees, including one of its named executive officers (but excluding the Company’s (i) President and Chief Executive
Officer, (ii) Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, (iii) Executive Vice President of Business Development and (iv) Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer) (collectively, the “Eligible
Employees”). The 2011 Retention Program is designed to provide Eligible Employees with certain incentives related to their past service and continuing employment with MCG. The 2011 Retention Program consists of an aggregate of (i) $1.3
million in cash and (ii) up to 114,750 shares of restricted common stock, $0.01 par value per share, of the Company (the “Common Stock”). 
 Retention Payments 
 Under the 2011 Retention Program, each Eligible Employee shall
be awarded a cash payment (each a “2011 Retention Payment”) representing a specified percentage of each such Eligible Employee’s annual cash bonus target for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2011. Each 2011 Retention Payment
shall be paid to each Eligible Employee in two equal installments on each of March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012, subject to continued employment with MCG. 
 Restricted Stock Awards 
 Additionally, pursuant to the 2011 Retention Program,
certain Eligible Employees shall be awarded shares of restricted Common Stock under the MCG Capital Corporation 2006 Employee Restricted Stock Plan, as amended (each, a “2011 Retention Stock Award”). The forfeiture provisions with respect
to 50% of the shares of restricted Common Stock subject to each 2011 Retention Stock Award shall lapse on each of March 31, 2012 and September 30, 2012. 
 The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors recommended for approval, and the Board of Directors of the Company approved, the specific dollar amount of each 2011 Retention Payment and the number
of shares of restricted Common Stock constituting each 2011 Retention Stock Award for the Eligible Employees.
, 

I 

·colN!f'HJD&'fHAIL 

REF ID:A722tai ~ 

BULLI::TIN ) 

Nln-!BER 52) 

S~CURITY VIOLATION 

I 

Washington 25, D. c. 

28 October 1948 

TO: Co!lllila.ndin.g Officer, .H.rlington Hall Station, and Chiefs, All Di visi·'.)ns and 

Branches 

It is desired th:it' the folluv-in~ statement be read to all persQnneL under 

your jurisdiction, ~nd thP.t ~ certificat.e to the effect that it h~s been reaabe forv.arded to AS-20: ~ 

11A te<tcher in one of the local schools, durinr the course of a convers.'ition, st3.ted th!!t a fUpil related the det:l.ils oi' ~his l'ather' s occupation. This pupil disclosed details of highly classific!d work perforoed 

by this Agency, ;nd indicated that his father ~~s employbd in such vork. 

This information could have been obtained only by overhe~ring extremely 

indiscreet talk, 

11 .3uch indiscretions not only jeopardize the mission of the Afency, but 

:1.lso are :i threu.t to the natiCJnal security. 

"Your attention is directed to the oath •~hich you executed ui:on your 

assignment to or entrance on duty v;i th the A~~ency. (This oath will be re3.d) 

11Your atte:ntion is further directed to the provisions of parap.,rar.hs 

12 and 15 of AR .380-5. (These pararraphs will be read) 

"It is desired that yuu familiarize y..:iurself with the provisions of 

AR 380-5, AR 380-10 and such other security rE:f,ul~tiuns as have bfen Gs- tablish~d to rrotect the security of the A~ency. 

11 It,;nor'>.nce of the re{'ulations is no excuse for indiscreet talk or 

other violations of security 'J.nd will not be condoned or toleratea. 11 

DIST:Fi.IBUTiuN 

"A" 

,., 

I . ' ,l . J 

/ 1 ; I ! "; . ,,..., I I I 

I • . ' I \. '' l" . HAEtGLD G. HAYES' ( 

Colonel, Signal Corps 

Chief, Army Secur:i ty A~!ency 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

COHFHDIEJNITHAIL
<PAGE>

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Lawrence E. Kreider and Joram C. Salig or any of them, each acting alone, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution,
for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection
with the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (the "Form 10-K") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of
the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this
18th day of February, 1997.



                                                     /s/ Ronald O. Perelman
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     RONALD O. PERELMAN
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 233 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.233

                    One Hundred Seventeenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
          the third day of January, two thousand and twenty two

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the Rocksprings Station of the U.S. Border Patrol located 
on West Main Street in Rocksprings, Texas, as the ``Donna M. Doss Border 
                            Patrol Station''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Donna M. Doss Memorial Act of 
2021''.
SEC. 2. FINDINGS.
    Congress finds the following:
        (1) A native of the State of Washington, Agent Donna Marie 
    Doss--
            (A) proudly and honorably served her country as an Agent of 
        the U.S. Border Patrol for more than 15 years;
            (B) began her service with the U.S. Border Patrol in 2003; 
        and
            (C) graduated as part of the 569th Session of the Border 
        Patrol Academy with Class 584 on June 6, 2005.
        (2) Agent Doss--
            (A) served on a Drug Enforcement Administration Task Force 
        on the southern border for 3 years before being assigned to the 
        northern border;
            (B) was promoted to Supervisory Border Patrol Agent in 
        Laredo Border Patrol Sector, where she was named an Operations 
        Officer in 2016; and
            (C) relocated to Abilene, Texas in 2017, where she served 
        as a Resident Agent.
        (3) On February 2, 2019, Agent Doss responded to a call for 
    assistance from the Texas Department of Public Safety near 
    Interstate 20 in Tye, Texas. While on scene, Agent Doss was struck 
    and killed by a passing vehicle.
        (4) Agent Doss is survived by her husband, father, mother, 2 
    stepchildren, a sister and a brother.
SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.
    The Rocksprings station of the U.S. Border Patrol located on West 
Main Street in Rocksprings, Texas, shall be known and designated as the 
``Donna M. Doss Border Patrol Station''.
SEC. 4. REFERENCES.
    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the station described in section 3 shall 
be deemed to be a reference to the ``Donna M. Doss Border Patrol 
Station''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-4256

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CHARLES JETER GRIFFITH, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CR-03-50) Submitted: September 15, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leslie Carter Rawls, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Thomas R. Ascik, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Charles Jeter Griffith seeks to appeal his conviction and 135-month sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (2000). On appeal, Griffith claims that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Finding no error, we affirm. Ineffective assistance claims are not generally addressed on direct appeal unless it appears conclusively from the record that Appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel. United States v. Richardson , 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir. 1999). Such claims generally should be raised by motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). Id.We conclude Griffith has not shown conclusively from the face of the record that counsel provided ineffective representation. Accordingly, we affirm Griffith's conviction without prejudice to his assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel claims in a § 2255 proceeding. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED