alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Third Amendment to the Chicago Bridge and Iron Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.1(b) 

Exhibit A 

CHICAGO BRIDGE & IRON 
 SAVINGS PLAN 
 (As amended and restated as of January 1, 2008)

 Third Amendment 
 Pursuant to resolution of the Board of Directors of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, a Delaware corporation (“Company) dated December     , 2009, the Chicago
Bridge & Iron Savings Plan, as amended and restated as of January 1, 2008, and subsequently amended (“Plan”), is hereby further amended in this Third Amendment as follows: 

1. Subsection 5.06 of the Plan is amended to read as follows: 

5.06 Allocation of Income or Loss. Any income or loss for the applicable Plan Year attributable to contributions
distributed pursuant to Sections 5.01, 5.02 or 5.03 shall be distributed or forfeited, as applicable. The Plan Administrator shall determine such distributable income or loss by computing income or loss attributable to distributed contributions for
the completed Plan Year using any reasonable method permitted under Treas. Reg. §§ 1.401(k)-2(b)(2)(iv), 1.401(m)-2(b)(2)(iv), and 1.402(g)-1(e)(5), as applicable; provided that the method does not violate Section 401(a)(4) of the
Code, is used consistently for all Participants and for all corrective distributions under the Plan for the Plan Year, and is used by the Plan for allocating income to Participants’ Accounts. No income (or loss) shall be distributed for the
period between the end of the applicable Plan Year and the date of distribution. 
 1. The foregoing amendment shall be
effective as of January 1, 2009. 
 Dated: December 18, 2009. 

 

			
		
	By:	 	/s/ Philip K. Asherman
		 	Director, Chicago Bridge & Iron Company
Exhibit
32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350








In
connection with the Annual Report of Emergent Group Inc. (the “registrant”) on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, William M. McKay,
Chief Financial Officer of the registrant, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
registrant.








March
      24, 2009/s/
              William M. McKayWilliam
      M. McKayChief
      Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 13755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06253]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 13755]]

                Memorandum of March 12, 2015

                
Delegation of Authority Pursuant to Section 
                1278(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
                for Fiscal Year 2015

                Memorandum for the Director of the National 
                Counterterrorism Center

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 301 of title 3, United 
                States Code, I hereby delegate the functions and 
                authorities vested in the President by section 
                1278(b)(1) of the National Defense Authorization Act 
                for Fiscal Year 2015 (Public Law 113-291) to the 
                Director of the National Counterterrorism Center.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, March 12, 2015

[FR Doc. 2015-06253
Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
Billing code 3910-A7
<PAGE>   1
                                                                     Exhibit 3.6


                      ACTION OF UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT
                          OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
                           PEACHTREE FIBEROPTICS INC.

     The undersigned members of the Board of Directors ("Board") of PEACHTREE
FIBEROPTICS, INC. (the "Corporation"), a Delaware corporation, do hereby
unanimously agree, consent to and adopt the following corporate actions pursuant
to section 141 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. The undersigned do
hereby waive all formal requirements, including the necessity of holding a
formal or informal meeting, and any requirement that notice of such meeting be
given. The undersigned hereby adopt the following corporate resolutions:

     RESOLVED, in accordance with Section 5.2(a) of Article V of the By-Laws of
     the Corporation ("By-Laws"), Sidney Levine, the sole director of the
     Corporation hereby nominates, appoints and approves the following two
     persons: Leonard J. Sokolow and Joel E. Marks to serve as directors of this
     Corporation, who have accepted such appointment;

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Board (consisting of the following persons:
     Sidney Levine, Leonard J. Sokolow and Joel E. Marks) deems it in the best
     interest of the Corporation to amend the By-Laws to change the minimum
     number of directors of the Corporation from three (3) to one (1); and in
     furtherance thereof, hereby modifies the first sentence of Section 3.2 of
     Article III of the By-Laws as it currently reads and adopts the following
     to replace such sentence;

          3.2 NUMBER AND QUALIFICATIONS. The number of directors shall be not
          less than one (1) and not more than seven (7), the exact number within
          such minimum and maximum limits to be fixed and determined from time
          to time by resolution of a majority of the Board of Directors.

     RESOLVED FURTHER, that Leonard J. Sokolow and Joel E. marks hereby resign
     as directors of the Corporation; and that the Board (consisting of Sidney
     Levine) hereby accepts such resignations;

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned directors of the Corporation have
executed the foregoing corporate action for the purpose of giving their consent
thereto effective as of the 24th day of January 1994.




                                        /s/ Sidney Levine
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Sidney Levine



                                        /s/ Leonard J. Sokolow
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Leonard J. Sokolow



                                        /s/ Joel E. Marks
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joel E. Marks
Opinion issued August 1, 2017

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 7
- 00 578
- C V

——————————— IN RE J OE DUHO N , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ s of Mandamus and Prohibition

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator, J o e Duho n , filed a combined petition for : (1) a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent , Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3, Grimes County,
to vacate t h e or der and abstract of judgment, both signed on April 17 , 2017, and (2) a writ of prohibition, among other things, to allow relator’s trial de novo to continue2

in County Court in the underlying proceeding

. 1 However, this Court’s mandamus jurisdiction is limited to: (1) issuance of writs of mandamus against a district court judge or county court judge in this Court’s district and (2) issuance of writs of mandamus necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdictio n. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(a)

– (b) (West 2004). We lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus against a justice of the peace unless the writ is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See In re Jackson , 01

- 15

- 00822

- CV, 2016 WL 26926 3, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 21, 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.) (dismissing mandamus pet ition for want of jurisdiction against justice of peace ) (citations omitted). Relator’s petition does not demonstrate that the relief he requests is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See T EX . G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 22.221(a). Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Brown

.

1 The underlying case is John Pierce v. Joe Duhon , Cause No. 201 6

- 01C , pending in the Justice Court, Precinct 3 , Grimes County, Texas, T he Honorable John LeFlore presiding.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0327

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

THOMAS JAMES LUCERO,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and 

good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including December 13, 2021, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 8 2021

11/08/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0327
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

CARMITA HUDENLL-TRIGGS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 138 MM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Leave to File 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
> 

ftf Pl'lb ~~·'°J8 ., ... 

W.fB. DIP ARTMllN'! 

!h• .a4Jutut General•• Of:f'ioe 

Va9htna,on 20, D. O. 

.5]_: - 36 71 - 38 

JJ'l/m4. 11.-872 Pen.tapn 

29 JU11 lM6 . 8UBJJ:D!1 B8glllatlozae tor SecurU7 an4 DlHeai-.. 

tion ot Oollll\Ullaatioa In•elllgenoe 1111111~188~1181iltll 

: !Of SllCftft I 

c .&u.tha I'.. ~.. :"'I 

I 1A1,1al.et ~, 7, I 

3 :Datea 29 46 I 

111i&11:::111::11&:J1 

1. ltfeotln upon reo•1P' ot thh leUer, aeaaiauon• tor Maintaininc 

th• S•C111"it1 of PllUl' lutelltgence, rete~e~ae lotter, IS 3114& (4 .fJlC 46) 

CJB..-... 3, d ~·' 1945, aubJect1 1eow.·lt7 Reg\\latioD1 tor PIIUP Intolltgenoe, 

Jtepla'\1ona tor Maintat.aiq 'h• a.cnarit:r of Spaci~ lutelllgnnc•, reterenae 

letter .. .tG 380.ot (8 Jul 44)0B-Se'B, 10 Jul7 1944. 1ul>Jeo\: 1a01.G"1t7 It1pl .. 

'lon• tor Spoail&l. Intell1 .. noe, u.d. any other replat1on.• pert&iQiDC to 

••ourltJ and 41ea8Jll1D&tlon of ColllllUDioatlon Intelltgence, aro aupereede4 

b7 the laoloaecl Wa:r Depar1iment Repl.aUon• for ISecm.r1tJ aud J)1eeembaat1on. 

ot CollllWdaatton Int•lligence. 

2. !ftt.J• let\er Md i\• 1110lOl'UZ"8 will be c11eVlbute4 OD.l,J' OT81' the ' 

1peolal ohallne11 preeorlbo4 therela tor Special Intel11.-no• and will be 

11&4• avalla"ble ozal.1 to peJ.'eone authorised to reo•1T• lpeclal ln\ell1gence 

pur•uant to tho 1nclo••4 R4tC1llation•. 

lo Let'er JO 311.G (4 ~ 48)0D-S-B, d ~e* 1946, e\l'bJeota Sf ourtt,-

Be&Ulatlou for PiltJP Jn,elU.gence, alL4 1•~,.,. ID aao.01 (8 JUl 44)on. s-:a, 

10 JUl7 19'4r1 subJeot~ Seouri'Y Regul.a,1on1 for Special Intelligeacer. v111 

be de•troJed b:r 'bvn1nco ll'o repor' ot de1t-ruatlon 1• r•quirot'> 

4r. llepiaotuaUoa of till• le'\tu u.4 t•• laclonre 1• prohib1te4, 

llf ORimn Oi' 'lD DCRBiART OY "All• 

1 11101 

B•&\ll.atioaa 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-18-2013 pursuant to E.O. 13s2e 

... 

JI 

; 

"-.. ...
: 

,r-_~ ____________ __ REF ID:A66520 

..---, 

• SECURITY .. FICATION (I/Hf) _,.... 

:J 'A5ST 

FILE NO. 

FROM ~ ... COMMENT NO. 1 

:.::.:1.r1· at1,,cr,t-. '"'!'l ls imr! t.cJ ~ ~~ :tccuJ.at.ion 122-1 :,;.:ct,.&on r-.r pllr x:, dd.tt:-id. 

2:' A..f"lt' J9$la 

co~~FIDE~~TI /\L 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-08-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

.;i::J~ :! .~~~!~, ~ 6 REPLACES NME FORM 11._1OCT41. W~CH MAT 8' U1ED 

~~~~ : -;:~··· _,. -· . 

u. e. aon:__,. PIUJl?.'llfO ornc1111tu o • 111111
Williams, Renee (OST) 'h^T'DST"/99"^^ JlS^X. 

Subject: F=V\|Nlg^MlON 

:-<FT OPERATIONS 

Z '9 !;0V -8 A ii> ] 8 November?, 2010 

New Smyrna Beach, Fl. 32169 

To whom it may concern: 

I do hope Cape Air will stay as an airline to Massena. 

Getting to the northeastern area of New York state is very hard, especially the Potsdam 

area where there are four colleges/universities. The families and the students would use 

an airline if they were aware of it.. 

Otherwise travelers have to fly to Syracuse and drive 2 1/2 hours,while Massena is only 

3/4 hour. 

Just imagine Massena with a few good restaurants, a hotel and car rental agency! 

Massena would grow as the hub of the northeast. Just don't change the character of that 

lovely town too much! 

Cape Air just needs advertising. Folks do not know about it, as travel agents do not deal 

with it.For years I have traveled from Florida upstate going through Syracuse. So much 

fuss to get me to Potsdam! Five hour round trip! Now I fly from Orlando, Florida to 

Albany, pick up Cape Air and have some one pick me up at Massena. 

For the benefit of both Cape Air and Massena I do hope you will keep prospering! 

Walma Taylor, Florida
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 12642)    
                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, March 24, 2015 01:00 p.m. to March 24, 2015, 05:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on February 03, 2015, 80FR5767.                

The meeting notice is amended to change the title from NCI/R01/U54 Review to NCI P01/R01/U54 Review. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: March 4, 2015.

Melanie J. Gray,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-05456 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2014219EN.01000202.xml

| 11.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 219/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 219/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7219 — Sonaci/DTS/Sonaci DT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 219/04

On 3 July 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7219. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7219. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2014196EN.01000101.xml

| 26.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 196/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 196/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 June 2014

(2014/C 196/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3615 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,73 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4550 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,80225 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1734 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2168 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3585 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,435 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1504 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3925 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9135 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4539 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4620 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5537 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5652 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7028 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 387,97 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4494 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4884 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5765 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 458,09 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3902 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,714 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,9875 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,208 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0133 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7689 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,8704 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3615

JPY

Japanese yen

138,73

DKK

Danish krone

7,4550

GBP

Pound sterling

0,80225

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1734

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2168

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3585

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,435

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1504

RON

Romanian leu

4,3925

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9135

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4539

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4620

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5537

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5652

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7028

KRW

South Korean won

1 387,97

ZAR

South African rand

14,4494

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4884

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5765

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 458,09

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3902

PHP

Philippine peso

59,714

RUB

Russian rouble

45,9875

THB

Thai baht

44,208

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0133

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7689

INR

Indian rupee

81,8704

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
**OFFICE** OFTHEATTORNEY GENERALoFTEXAS AUSTIN xoaowb& T* lb mhbl-8, Plmt Awlatud stat* 

### waperlntwdwt OSPall8 Iwtrwtion hwtln, TQU Dwr Sk8
8 portion ot our mr am8 or t h a t &8

nw b 8 r o f l kAwt8

# P
#### Townsend and another vs. Peasley. (Second case.)

*Record on Appeal.*

On appeal from a justice’s judgment for less than $15 damages, the cause being heard in the circuit court on the original papers and return of the justice, which must contain all the material evidence and the rulings of the justice, such return becomes a part of the record; and, on appeal to this court, it is included in the judgment roll, and no bill of exceptions is necessary to enable this court to review questions arising upon the evidence.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *La Fayette*County.

*Oothren & Lanyon,*for defendant, who was also appellant.

*Orton &*Osborn, for plaintiffs, who were also respondents.

Cole, J.

'This action was founded upon the same contract relied on in the former suit. It was tried before a justice, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for less than $15. The defendant took an appeal to the circuit court, where the cause was tried on the return of the justice, made in conformity with section 217, ch. 120, R. S. The question as to the right of the plaintiffs to prove the parol contract is disposed of in the previous case. But it is objected that there is no bill of exceptions, and therefore this court can not review the case upon the merits. We suppose no bill of exceptions was necessary in order to enable us to consider the questions arising upon the evidence. The appeal in the circuit court had to be heard on the original papers and return of the justice, which the statute says must contain all the material evidence and rulings of the justice. Sec. 217. This return is annexed to and becomes a part of the judgment roll. Sec. 218. It is thus made part of the record, and, as a matter of course, did not require to be incorporated in a bill of exceptions. The case of *Davidson v.*Davidson, 10 Wis., 86, was one originating and tried in the circuit court. But see *Pfeil v. Harboldt,*11 Wis., 9, where a case more in point will be found.

*393*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded to that court with directions to reverse the judgment of the justice. ,