alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1
 Independent Auditors on Report of Financial Statement Schedule




---



##### 



Schedule II Corel Corporation
 Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(in thousands of USD)
 Balanceat
    
    Additions
    
    Deductions,
    
    BalanceBeginning
    
    Charged
    
    Returns,
    
    atof
    
    to Expenses
    
    and
    
    End ofPeriod
    
    or Revenue
    
    Write-offs
    
    PeriodAllowance for Doubtful AccountsYear ended November 30, 2008
    
    
    1,366
    
    
    
    1,092
    
    
    
    1,101
    
    
    
    1,357Year ended November 30, 2007
    
    
    1,003
    
    
    
    401
    
    
    
    38
    
    
    
    1,366Year ended November 20, 2006
    
    
    1,117
    
    
    
    198
    
    
    
    312
    
    
    
    1,003Promotional rebatesYear ended November 30, 2008
    
    
    715
    
    
    
    5,564
    
    
    
    5,321
    
    
    
    958Year ended November 30, 2007
    
    
    2,803
    
    
    
    10,664
    
    
    
    12,752
    
    
    
    715Year ended November 30, 2006
    
    
    1,048
    
    
    
    11,125
    
    
    
    9,370
    
    
    
    2,803Allowance for Sales ReturnsYear ended November 30, 2008
    
    
    6,403
    
    
    
    10,997
    
    
    
    12,650
    
    
    
    4,750Year ended November 30, 2007
    
    
    8,024
    
    
    
    10,071
    
    
    
    11,692
    
    
    
    6,403Year ended November 30, 2006
    
    
    6,900
    
    
    
    11,919
    
    
    
    10,795
    
    
    
    8,024
1.• • l~ff ~~~~~~Jl 36

• W'ashint.:trn 25, - • C. 

CSG.~S-20 11 February 194B 

BULLETIN NOHBER 6 

SUBJECT: Rcltk"';rks of the !"lcputy Chief of Staff Reference Socuri ty. 

TO: Arlington Hall Station, Including /.11 Divisions and Branches 

1. The followine ccmmcnts of tho Deputy Chief cf Staff, m.ado ~t the 

last Gonor:tl Council ::~coting,, arc qur:tcd for the inforru.1.tir·n ::-nd gt. innnce 

of ell pers0nncl in the IntclliGcncc iliviston: 

"Some tine ago I m.i.do mcntj r·n c:1f the current lnxity in the. 

handling of secrot docu1!1.onts arid S·:-Jcurity in general. Since 

the ~partmont of Justice ho.s s11bmi ttod to the Crngrcss propoe.ed 

legislation provid:i.ng fc-r tho punishment rf t~ose whci fl.l.il to 

report tho loss er compromise of cl~ssificd itVPls ~ffccting 

national defense,, we want to be suro that wo trku st0ps to prE·vcnt 

such instnnces arising in tho Army. Instructicns have been pr·cpared 

which will require immedi~to invostiGati~n and report c.f Qny 

viclation of tho pr0visicns of AR 380-5 nnd tho Espionage /.ct to 

insure that when ~ny incident arises, disciplinRry P.cti~n wilJ be 

tpkon - irrespective of tho rP.nk C""r positil"'ln cf the pcrscm invclved. 

This will be the l~t time I P.m gning to mention this subject~ The 

instructicns fil'e cloP.r. When 1:mch n viol['..tinn is discovered j t will 

be up to the hcl"d of tho :ii.vision concerned to make nn i.mmedic.te 

invcstignti0n Pnd l;.?ke apprcprintc A.ctinn, 11 

2~ As the :Jep.nrtmcnt of the Army agency primarily rosp('lnsiblEi fc.r 

tho fcrmulntirn ~nd onforcoment of ~dcquate security measures, thie subject 

should have spcci~.l significance to nll mcmbors of this :J:i.visi0n. 

BY OR~ OF COLONEL HJ.YES: 

OFFICIAL: J/.t~. F. RI'rTER 

JfRjor,, !.GI 

/.d.iu!:,nnt 

J:JIFS • F. RITTER 

Major, .t.GJ 

Adjutant 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-06-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

:>ISTRIBUTION 

It /L II
1 Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases

on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless

expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession."

Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-10346

Summary Calendar

_____________________

CURTIS BROADNAX,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

LONE STAR GAS COMPANY, A DIVISION OF ENSERCH CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(3:94-CV-752-D)

_____________________________________________________

December 11, 1995

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:1

In this action claiming race discrimination in his discharge

from his accountant position, in violation of Title VII of the

Civil Rights Act of 1967, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., Curtis

Broadnax, pro se, challenges the district court's denial of his

motion for appointment of counsel and the summary judgment granted

his employer, Lone Star Gas Co. (Broadnax did not respond to the

summary judgment motion.) We conclude that the district court did
- 2 -

not abuse its discretion in denying appointment of counsel. And,

for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion (it assumed

arguendo that Broadnax established a prima facie case), we

conclude, based on our de novo review, that the summary judgment

was proper. Accordingly, we 

AFFIRM.
# C_2014207EN.01000101.xml

| 3.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 207/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 207/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

2 July 2014

(2014/C 207/01)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3656 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,65 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4563 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79580 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1574 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2137 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,4250 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,432 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 311,10 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1456 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3864 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9053 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4447 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4535 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5835 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5568 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7013 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 377,92 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6314 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4816 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5865 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 272,80 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3706 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,538 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 46,7560 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,204 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0113 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,6777 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,3283 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3656

JPY

Japanese yen

138,65

DKK

Danish krone

7,4563

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79580

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1574

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2137

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,4250

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,432

HUF

Hungarian forint

311,10

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1456

RON

Romanian leu

4,3864

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9053

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4447

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4535

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5835

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5568

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7013

KRW

South Korean won

1 377,92

ZAR

South African rand

14,6314

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4816

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5865

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 272,80

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3706

PHP

Philippine peso

59,538

RUB

Russian rouble

46,7560

THB

Thai baht

44,204

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0113

MXN

Mexican peso

17,6777

INR

Indian rupee

81,3283

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Reader’s Guide for Diflufenzopyr & Diflufenzopyr-sodium

CRM: Julia Stokes

EPA/OCSPP/OPP/PRD

Reader’s Guide to Diflufenzopyr & Diflufenzopyr-sodium

Docket # EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0911

Publication Date: June 20, 2012

The Agency is providing the “Readers Guide” to allow the reader to more easily access and 

navigate the various entries contained in the diflufenzopyr and diflufenzopyr-sodium docket.

Federal Register and Docket Organizational Documents:

Docket Item 1. Federal Register Notice: Registration Review; Pesticide Dockets Opened 

for Review and Comment and Other Docket Actions.

Docket Item 2. Reader’s Guide to the Diflufenzopyr and Diflufenzopyr-sodium Docket # 

EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0911.

Docket Item 3. Diflufenzopyr and Diflufenzopyr-sodium Preliminary Work 

Plan/Summary Document in support of Registration Review: Initial 

Docket June 20, 2012.

Human Health Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 4. Diflufenzopyr and Diflufenzopyr-sodium. Human-Health Risk Scoping

Document in Support of Registration Review. April 3, 2012.

This document evaluates the status of the human health assessments to determine the scope of 

work necessary to support the registration review of diflufenzopyr and diflufenzopyr-sodium.

Docket Item 5. Diflufenzopyr and Diflufenzopyr-sodium. Review of Human Incidents. 

December 7, 2011.

This report represents human health incidents occurring in the United States from 2006 to 2011

for diflufenzopyr and diflufenzopyr-sodium, only.

Environmental Fate and Effects Documents for Registration Review

Docket Item 6. Registration Review - Preliminary Problem Formulation for Ecological 

Risk and Environmental Fate, Endangered Species, and Drinking Water

Assessments for Diflufenzopyr. April 16, 2012.
This document defines the problem for the assessment, and develops a plan for analyzing and 

characterizing the ecological risks.

Use and Usage Information for Registration Review

Docket Item 7. BEAD Chemical Profile for Registration Review: Diflufenzopyr 

(005108) and Diflufenzopyr-sodium (005107) November 10, 2011.

This document provides usage information and an overview of the pest management role of,

diflufenzopyr and diflufenzopyr-sodium.

Docket Item 8. Appendix A: Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in 

Registration Review Work Planning. Diflufenzopyr-sodium (005107). 

October 25, 2011.

This table lists the food/feed and non-food/non- feed uses for diflufenzopyr-sodium (005107).

Additional document:

Docket Item 9. Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA) for Diflufenzopyr. September 7, 

2011
AG ENDA Pfizer A nimal Health Product -Specific Mitigation Meeting Tuesday , June 1, 2010 , at 3:00 pm

Room TBD

I. Introductions II. Pfizer Presentation III. Agency Response IV. Petting Study Protocol Discussion V. Other Issues VI. Questions and Answers VII. Next Steps
Opinion issued August 1, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-17-00578-CV

———————————

IN RE JOE DUHON, Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writs of Mandamus and Prohibition

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Joe Duhon, filed a combined petition for: (1) a writ of mandamus

seeking to compel the respondent, Justice of the Peace, Precinct 3, Grimes County, 

to vacate the order and abstract of judgment, both signed on April 17, 2017, and (2) 

a writ of prohibition, among other things, to allow relator’s trial de novo to continue 
2

in County Court in the underlying proceeding.

1

 However, this Court’s mandamus 

jurisdiction is limited to: (1) issuance of writs of mandamus against a district court 

judge or county court judge in this Court’s district and (2) issuance of writs of 

mandamus necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE 

ANN. § 22.221(a)–(b) (West 2004). We lack jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus 

against a justice of the peace unless the writ is necessary to enforce our appellate 

jurisdiction. See In re Jackson, 01-15-00822-CV, 2016 WL 269263, at *1 (Tex. 

App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 21, 2016, orig. proceeding) (per curiam) (mem. op.) 

(dismissing mandamus petition for want of jurisdiction against justice of peace)

(citations omitted). Relator’s petition does not demonstrate that the relief he requests 

is necessary to enforce our appellate jurisdiction. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 

22.221(a).

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Higley, Bland, and Brown.

 

1 The underlying case is John Pierce v. Joe Duhon, Cause No. 2016-01C, pending in 

the Justice Court, Precinct 3, Grimes County, Texas, The Honorable John LeFlore

presiding.
HeinOnline -- 45 Fed. Reg. 32675 1980HeinOnline -- 45 Fed. Reg. 32676 1980
Exhibit
21.1

SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Set forth below
is a list of certain of the Registrant's subsidiaries. Such
subsidiaries are incorporated or organized in the jurisdictions
indicated. Each of the listed subsidiaries is wholly owned by the
Registrant directly, or indirectly, and all listed subsidiaries are
included in the Registrant's consolidated financial statements.
The names of the Registrant's remaining subsidiaries, if any,
which may have been omitted from the following list, considered in the
aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant
subsidiary.

Domestic Subsidiaries

Almay, Inc., a
Delaware corporationCharles of the Ritz Group Ltd., a Delaware
corporationCharles Revson Inc., a New York
corporationCosmetics & More Inc., a Delaware
corporationNorth America Revsale Inc., a New York
corporationPPI Two Corporation, a Delaware corporationRevlon
Consumer Corp., a Delaware corporationRevlon Development Corp., a
Delaware corporationRevlon Government Sales, Inc., a Delaware
corporationRevlon International Corporation, a Delaware
corporationRevlon Products Corp., a Delaware
corporationRevlon Real Estate Corporation, a Delaware
corporationRIROS Corporation, a New York corporationRIROS
Group Inc., a Delaware corporation

Foreign
Subsidiaries

ACN 000 189 186 Pty Limited
(Australia)CEIL – Comercio e Distribuidora Ltda.
(Brazil)Cendico B.V. (Netherlands)Deutsche Revlon GmbH
(Germany)European Beauty Products S.L.
(Spain)Européenne de Produits de Beauté, S.A.S.
(France)New Revlon Argentina S.A. (Argentina)Productos
Cosmeticos de Revlon, S.A. (Guatemala) Promethean Insurance
Limited (Bermuda)REMEA Luxembourg S.A.R.L. (Luxembourg)REMEA
1 B.V. (Netherlands)REMEA 2 B.V. (Netherlands)Revlon AB
(Sweden)Revlon Australia Pty Limited (Australia)Revlon Beauty
Products, S.L. (Spain)Revlon B.V. (Netherlands)Revlon Canada
Inc. (Canada)Revlon (Cayman) Limited (Cayman Islands)Revlon
Chile S.A. (Chile)Revlon China Holdings Limited (Cayman
Islands)Revlon Europe, Middle East and Africa Ltd.
(Bermuda)Revlon Group Limited (United Kingdom)Revlon (Hong
Kong) Limited (Hong Kong)Revlon (Israel) Limited
(Israel)Revlon Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan)Revlon Ltda.
(Brazil)

---

Revlon Manufacturing Ltd. (Bermuda)Revlon
Mauritius Ltd. (Mauritius)Revlon New Zealand Limited (New
Zealand)Revlon Offshore Limited (Bermuda)Revlon Overseas
Corporation, C.A. (Venezuela)Revlon Pension Trustee Company (U.K.)
Limited (United Kingdom)Revlon (Puerto Rico) Inc. (Puerto
Rico)Revlon Real Estate Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan)Revlon, S.A.
de C.V. (Mexico)Revlon (Shanghai) Limited (China)Revlon South
Africa (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)Revlon S.p.A.
(Italy)Revlon (Suisse) S.A. (Switzerland)Revlon Taiwan
Limited (Taiwan)RGI Beauty Products (Pty.) Limited (South
Africa)RGI Limited (Cayman Islands)S.E.F.A.O., S.A.
(Spain)Shanghai Revstar Cosmetic Marketing Services Limited
(China)YAE Artistic Packings Industry Ltd. (Israel)YAE Press
2000 (1987) Ltd. (Israel)

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

IN THE MATTER OF A MEMBER §

OF THE BAR OF THE SUPREME § No. 4 67 , 2015

COURT OF THE STATE OF §

DELAWARE: §

§

KENNETH J. YOUNG

, §

Petitioner

. §

Submitted: August 27 , 2015

Decided: August 31 , 201 5

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; HOLLAND

, and SEITZ

, Justices.

O R D E R

This 31st day of August 201 5

, u pon receipt of sufficient evidence

demonstrating that Kenneth J. Young , Esquire (“the Petitioner”) is suffering

from physical or mental health pro blems that adversely affect his ability to

practice law, and without opposition from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel

(“the ODC”), it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

(1) The Petitioner, for good cause shown, is hereby immediately

transferred to disability inac tive status under Rule 19 of the Delaware

Lawyers’ Rules of Disciplinary Procedure.

(2) The Petitioner shall not practice law in this State or in any other

jurisdiction.

(3) The Petitioner represents to the Court that John Garey , Esquire

and Constantine Malmberg, Esquire

, both member s in good standing of the2

Delaware Bar, have assume d responsibility for all of the Petitioner’s client

matters. Thus, no receiver need be appointed.

(4) Any disciplinary proceedings currently under investigation by

the ODC a re deferred pending further order of this Court.

(5) This Order shall be made public.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice
Exhibit 4.9
 Exhibit B  to  Credit Agreement
 Form of Revolving Credit Note
 Lender: [Name of Lender]
    
    
    
    New York, New YorkPrincipal Amount: [$]
    
    
    
    July 9, 2004
 For value received Revlon Consumer Products Corporation Company Lender
  Citicorp Multi-Currency
Administrative Agent th
 Credit Agreement
    B-1




---



##### 



[Signature Pages Follow]
 B-2




---



##### 



In witness whereof
 Revlon Consumer Products CorporationBy:Name:Title: [Signature Page from Revolving Credit Note of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation]
,ii 

Bsc ltr AC&SS, Maxwell AFB Ala, 5 Feb 54, subj: Request for Guest 

Speaker 

AUSY 1st Ind 9 Feb 1954 

Headquarters, Air University. Maxwell AF Base; A.labama. 

TO: Director, National Security Agency, Washington 25, D. c. 

R.J.P 

2nd Ind Serial: 

National Security Agency, Washington 25, D. C. 

TO: Headquarters, Air University, Mlxwell AF Base, Alabama 

Mr. Friedman is available for the scheduled lecture at the Air 

Command and Staff School on the date indicated. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR: 

cc: AG 

c/s 

S/ ASST (Mr. Friedman) 

M/R: Self-explanatory. 

GEO. E. CAMPBELL 

Colonel, AGC 

Adjutant General 

M.MFelerski/S/ASST/60493/19 Feb 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 03-31-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

2 
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE 

AIR UNIVERSITY 

HEADQUARTERS 

AIR COMMAND AND STAFF SCHOOL 

MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA 

'!1i!tU• C(i •taAdl• 

·AU 1JD.i.Y4JN-!S;F 

MU.Jloell -.!1~ 191"Ge Saa, !la.._ ' ' 

re1 .oir-ow, · ~.t.~ ~- i,,_,,, -..'.d&'IC'OA 2'. tJ:. C. 

iii S FEB 1S54 

l. tu .-,_e:'Ct ~1cut.~a Int.ll.1cwicit'1 hu. btel\ ·ieolwt4'4 

in ttho. •Vl"ieulue tor u. ~~tio~ltt~• Sutt onto.a ~. Che• '4-'• -~ requea\ UY.at ~. ~UUmo F. frictdan of 7<$0 

&g4M.1 ~' M.• Gtl~'Ue ad et.!Av.Utiztc 1'iau on tm euj&d.. 

l. '?'~ve ttla:uJ !~ l1?. ¥'r'iedro!m.' a l.9e\t:"o '"'f'G bt!eA eade 

f:;r ~be ~rl.ode ~ to 1100 • Jl ~~ 195.b. - Qp« dnailt-eJ..r 

Uta\ he •ill ~. able '\.~ fit thu itaw iDtc h:Lt tqJ1 aehadu.lef ~r, 

it \his 1• N)\ rio~. ~ua •«ise q o-! 4 "°" -~it..ble aw. 

tor4 m~ cr.;w..t"1).1\.tff J
THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20590 

The Honorable Mary L. Landrieu 

United States Senate 

Washington, DC 2051 0 

Dear Senator Landrieu: 

August 22, 2013 

Thank you for your letter supporting the application submitted by the Shreveport Airport 

Authority for a grant under the U.S. Department of Transportation's Small Community Air 

Service Development Program. 

The Small Comm1mity Air Service Development Progran1 was established to help smaller 

communities address air service deficiencies, particularly issues related to high airfares or 

insufficient service. Under the statute, the Department may make a maximum of 40 grant 

awards each year, although no more than four awards may be to communities in the same State. 

In order to provide communities with latitude in developing solutions to their air service 

deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types of projects that can be funded. 

On June 24, the Department issued an order setting a deadline of July 26 for applications. As 

these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits of any 

particular proposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all 

proposals that have been properly filed. 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and this response in Docket 

DOT-OST-2013-0120 as a contact outside the record of this matter. I appreciate your interest in 

this program. 

Sincerely, 

Anthony R. Foxx 
ianitro ~tattB j;matt WASiliNGTON. 00 ~051()., 11104 

July24, 2013 

Tiu~ Honoraple Anthony Foxl< 

Secretary, U.S. Department ofTransponation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Wuhington DC 2ll59CI 

Dear Seeretm:y Fon: 

r t is my pleasure to support the endeavor of the Shreveport Airport Authority in its 

propo5lll for the Small Community Air Service Development grant. A successful application 

gives the Shreveport Airport Authority the abilily to augment airline. service through the addition 

of a route to either the Midwest or Atlantic region. 

As Northwest Louisinna, east Te~ Md southwest Arltrulsas continue to srow, the need 

for such a route el<ponentially heightet~S. These growing economies Sl.llnd m benefit iTnmet~Sely 

with the expansion of airline routes, as connee~ions to the continental United States and 

internationally provide tl)c· Shreveport Regional Airport the opportunity to gain more air traffic. 

A new route is essential to the region this nirport serves nnd could potentially boost the 

Shreveport Regional Airport into ~1e eompotitive natUre of air travel. 

Please give your consideration to the Shreveport Airport Authority as 1 firmly malota.in 

their legitimacy as well as their pmfuund mission. Should you have any questions reaarding this 

matter, please do nothesitata to contact my New Orlesns office at (504)589·2427. 

With kind regard, I am, 

MLL:klc 

24
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.2



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
(Form S-8 No. 333-31299) of Ticketmaster Group, Inc. of our report dated
February 24, 1998 (except for Note 13, as to which the date is April 10, 1998)
with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Ticketmaster Group,
Inc. included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Ticketmaster
Group, Inc. listed in Item 14(a) in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This
schedule is the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion based on our audit. In our opinion, the financial
statement schedule referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all
material respects the information set forth therein.


Ernst & Young LLP


Los Angeles, California
April 23, 1998