alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2341 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2341

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the treatment of 
  moving expenses to employees and new appointees in the intelligence 
  community who move pursuant to a change in assignment that requires 
                              relocation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2021

     Mr. Rubio (for himself, Mr. Warner, Mr. Burr, Mr. Sasse, Mrs. 
  Gillibrand, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. King, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Blunt, Ms. 
 Collins, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Risch, Mr. Casey, and Mr. Cotton) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to expand the treatment of 
  moving expenses to employees and new appointees in the intelligence 
  community who move pursuant to a change in assignment that requires 
                              relocation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Intelligence Community Workforce 
Agility Protection Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF TREATMENT OF MOVING EXPENSES.

    (a) Purpose.--The purpose of this section is to facilitate the 
movement of members of the intelligence community to meet mission 
critical needs and to reduce unintended tax burdens imposed on public 
servants in relocating duty stations.
    (b) Deduction.--Section 217(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by inserting ``or an employee or new appointee of the 
intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National 
Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)) (other than a member of the 
Armed Forces of the United States) who moves pursuant to a change in 
assignment that requires relocation'' after ``to whom subsection (g) 
applies''.
    (c) Exclusion for Qualified Moving Expense Reimbursements.--Section 
132(g)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting 
``or an employee or new appointee of the intelligence community (as 
defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
3003)) (other than a member of the Armed Forces of the United States) 
who moves pursuant to a change in assignment that requires relocation'' 
after ``change of station''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
'~~ CAriif'feORGA:iTION AND LOCATION 

INITIALS 

DATE 

2 

3 

4 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURH 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

NSA on 11-18-2013 ursuantto E .0. 1352 

DD fORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Form 896, 1 Apr 48, and AF:UQ I FEB 50 Form 12. 10 Nov 47, which lllQ" be uaed.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2330 

To amend the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to clarify certain matters 

relating to State funding, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2021 

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, 

Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 to clarify 

certain matters relating to State funding, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Assisting Broadband 

5 Connectivity Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. STATE FUNDING UNDER RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE 

7 PROGRAMS. 

8 (a) ELIGIBILITY OF PROJECTS THAT RECEIVE

9 STATE FUNDING.—Title VII of the Rural Electrification 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2330 IS

1 Act of 1936 (7 U.S.C. 950cc et seq.) is amended by adding 

2 at the end the following: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 704. ELIGIBILITY OF PROJECTS THAT RECEIVE 

4 STATE FUNDING. 

5 ‘‘In administering any broadband or telecommuni6 cations program, the Secretary, acting through the Ad7 ministrator of the Rural Utilities Service, shall not deter8 mine that a project is ineligible for funding because the 

9 project has received funding from a State.’’. 

10 (b) STATE FUNDS TO SATISFY MATCHING REQUIRE11 MENTS.—For purposes of any matching funds require12 ment under any program administered by the Secretary 

13 of Agriculture, acting through the Administrator of the 

14 Rural Utilities Service, an applicant for funding under 

15 that program may use funds received from a State pro16 gram (including funds received by a State from the Fed17 eral Government) to satisfy the matching funds require18 ment. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14127]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06079]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 4908-015]


Tannery Island Power Corporation; Ampersand Tannery Island Hydro, 
LLC; Notice of Transfer of Exemption

    1. By letter filed September 29, 2014, Ampersand Tannery Island 
Hydro, LLC informed the Commission that the exemption from licensing 
for the Tannery Island Project, FERC No. 4908, originally issued July 
11, 1983,\1\ has been transferred from Tannery Island Power Corporation 
to Ampersand Tannery Island Hydro, LLC. The project is located on the 
Black River in Jefferson County, New York. The transfer of an exemption 
does not require Commission approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 24 FERC ] 61,021, Order Modifying Order Vacating Grant of 
Exemptions from Licensing (1983).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    2. Ampersand Tannery Island Hydro, LLC is now the exemptee for the 
Tannery Island Project, FERC No. 4908. All correspondence should be 
forwarded to: Mr. Jingdong Huang, Asset Manager, Ampersand Tannery 
Island Hydro, LLC, 717 Atlantic Avenue, Suite 1A, Boston, MA 02111.

    Dated: March 11, 2015.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06079 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,500
<SECURITIES>                                    15,400
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,900
<PP&E>                                          29,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                (29,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           60,700
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,700
<OTHER-SE>                                    (59,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,800
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   100
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
#### The State ex rel. Asplundh Tree Expert Company, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 65.]

(No. 97-525

Submitted June 9, 1999

Decided July 7, 1999.)

*Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur*and *Christopher C. Russell,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Gerald H. Waterman,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Barkan & Neff Co., L.P.A.,*and *Merl H. Wayman,*for appellee O’Nail.

*66*Stewart Jaffy & Associates, Stewart R. Jaffy*and *Marc J. Jaffy,*urging affirmance for *amici curiae,*Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers and Ohio AFL-CIO.

*Per Curiam.*

We are asked to determine whether claimant’s receipt of Social Security Disability (“SSD”) benefits bars wage-loss compensation. Upon review, we find that it does not.

Social Security disability demands an inability to work. Section 404.1505, Title 20, C.F.R. Wage loss does not. Instead, wage-loss compensation encourages alternative employment when a claimant cannot return to the former position of employment but retains a residual capacity for other work. ATEC essentially maintains that a residual work capacity was implied by the job search claimant made as a prerequisite to his wage-loss compensation application. ATEC argues that SSD benefits and wage-loss compensation are, therefore, inconsistent and warrant the latter’s denial.

Federal and state legislators disagree. First, SSD and work activity are not completely irreconcilable. Section 422(c)(4), Title 42, U.S.Code allows SSD recipients to engage in a “period of trial work” without jeopardizing their SSD benefits.

Second, federal law permits an SSD/workers’ compensation offset only if state law so provides. Section 424a(a)(2)(A), Title 42, U.S.Code. Federal law does not, therefore, view receipt of SSD and workers’ compensation benefits as inherently inconsistent.

Neither does the law of this state. The General Assembly has addressed two situations involving concurrent payment of SSD or Social Security Retirement benefits and workers’ compensation benefits. See R.C. 4123.56(D) and 4123.58(B). Wage-loss compensation is not one of them.

Claimant’s receipt of SSD benefits did not, therefore, compel a dénial of wage-loss compensation, and the commission did not abuse its discretion in so finding.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

U.S. FOOD & DRUG

ADMINISTRATION, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-17131

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-04376-EDL

Northern District of California, 

San Francisco

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as

precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit. 

FILED

AUG 03 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

CALYPSO WIRELESS, INC. AND DRAGO DAIC,

Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants,

AND

JIMMY WILLIAMSON, P.C.,

Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,

v.

T-MOBILE USA, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2013-1343

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in No. 08-CV-0441, Judge J. 

Rodney Gilstrap.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MATTHEW CLAYTON JUREN, Matthews Lawson, PLLC, 

of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiffs/counterclaim 

defendants-appellants and Counterclaim defendantappellant. On the brief was Guy E. Matthews. Of counsel 

were HOLLY H. BARNES and CARROLL VERNON LAWSON. 
 

JOSH A. KREVITT, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, of 

New York, New York, argued for defendant/counterclaimant-appellee. With him on the brief were 

ANNE MARIE CHAMPION, of New York, New York, ALISON 

R. WATKINS and RYAN IWAHASHI, of Palo Alto, California, 

and ALEXANDER N. HARRIS, of Washington, DC.

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 5, 2014 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Date Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Clerk of Court
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05748]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463 as amended), the National Science Foundation announces the 
following meeting:

    Name: Proposal Review Panel for Materials Research--The Science 
of Learning Center (V151597) Spatial Intelligence and Learning 
Center (SILC), University of Chicago Site Visit (#1203).
    Dates and Times:
May 4, 2015; 6:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m.
May 5, 2015; 7:30 a.m.-8:30 p.m.
May 6, 2015; 7:30 a.m.-4:00 p.m.
    Place: University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637.
    Type of Meeting: Part Open.
    Contact Person: Dr. Soo-Siang Lim, Program Director, Science of 
Learning Centers Program, Division of Behavioral and Cognitive 
Science, Room 995, National Science Foundation, 4201 Wilson 
Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22230, Telephone (703) 292-7878.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and recommendations 
concerning further support of the SLC program SILC at University of 
Chicago.

Agenda

Wednesday, May 4, 2015

6:00 p.m.-10:00 p.m. Closed--Briefing of panel

 Thursday, May 5, 2015

7:30 a.m.-5:30 p.m. Open--Review of the MRSEC
5:30 p.m.-6:00 p.m. Closed--Executive Session
6:45 p.m.-8:30 p.m. Open--Dinner

 Friday, May 6, 2015

7:30 a.m.-10:00 a.m. Closed--Executive Session
10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m. Closed--Executive Session, Draft and Review 
Report

    Reason for Closing: The work being reviewed during this site 
visit may include information of a proprietary or confidential 
nature, including technical information; financial data, such as 
salaries and personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the SILC. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552 b(c), (4) 
and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.

    Dated: March 10, 2015.
Suzanne Plimpton,
Acting, Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2015-05748 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Whitman Education Group,
Inc. (the  "Company") for the period ended  September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Fernando  L.  Fernandez,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements o f Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2)   the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



By:  /s/ FERNANDO L. FERNANDEZ
     -------------------------
     Fernando L. Fernandez
     Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer,
     Treasurer and Secretary
     November 7, 2002
p. 1



# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 155 ) ll-K-(B)-15 4 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:53 AM Sheet 155 of 325P. 2

«:- v* • 

### ENERG Y AND ENVIRONMENTA L ANALYSIS , INC . 165 5 NORT

H FOR T MYE RDRIV E ARLINGTON, VIRGINI A 2220 9 703/528-190 0

Octobe r 29 , 198 4 

# A-83-2 7

II-K-CB)-15 4



## L

Mr . Rober t Shor t Economi c Analysi s Branc h U.S . Environmenta l Protectio nAgenc y Mai l Drop-1 2 Researc hTriangl e Park , NC 2771 1 Subject : EPA

Contrac t No . 68-02-3564 , Wor k Assignmen t #1 9 Dea r Robert : Attache di s a summar y o f tota l projecte dsoli dwast e an d liqui d discharg e disposa l requirement s i n 1990 . Estimate s ar e include dfo r tw o set s o f projecte dindustria l fue l prices : Referenc e Cas e an d Highe r Oi l andGas.Prices . Thes e estimate s hav e bee nderive dfro m 1 4 IFCA M run s (mad e betwee nJul y

an d Octobe r 1984) . Sincerely ,

Ti m Hoga n TH/c e Enclosur e
cc : Dr . A . Weh e

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMIC S /

ENGINEERIN G199 0 IFCA M PROJECTIONS '

Scenario s Regulator y

Baselin e Optio nCas e 1 Optio nCas e 2 Optio nCas e 3 Optio nCas e 4 Optio nCas e 5 Optio nCas e 6 

### ca s 107 7 3 76 42 7 2 12 7 12 7 Soli d wast e (IO 3 shor t tons ) Referenc e Highe r oi l and ga s price s Liqui ddischarg e 3 (1 0 cubi c meters ) Referenc e Highe r oi l an d cas e ga s price s 1,35 4 1,22 5 1,15 3 77 3 75 1 77 3 71 8 81 1 73 2 1,15 4 1,26 2 3,20 6 4,20 5 4,94 4 66 7 69 9 82 6 5,58 4 5,71 9 6,08 0 6,06 2

New industria l fossi l fuel-fire d boiler s installe d afte r 198 5 whic har e large r than10 0 MMBtu/hr . include s botto

m as hfro

m coa l boiler s an

d fl y as hcollecte d b

y particulat e matte r emission s contro l equip ment . "Sodiu m throwawa y

FGD waste .

• j Correspon d t o scenario s summarize d i nTable s 1 an d 2 o f a lette r fro

m T . Hoga nt o R . Shor t date dOctobe r 19 , 1984 .
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13371]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2744-000]


North East Wisconsin Hydro, LLC; Notice of Authorization for 
Continued Project Operation

    On February 28, 2013 the North East Wisconsin Hydro, LLC, licensee 
for the Menominee-Park Mill Hydroelectric Project, filed an Application 
for a New License pursuant to the Federal Power Act (FPA) and the 
Commission's regulations thereunder. The Menominee-Park Mill 
Hydroelectric Project is located on Menominee River in Marinette 
County, Wisconsin and in Menominee County, Michigan.
    The license for Project No. 2744 was issued for a period ending 
February 28, 2015. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1), 
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue 
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee under the 
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is 
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section 
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior 
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based 
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), 
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project 
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may 
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license 
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee 
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent 
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to 
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a 
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that an annual license for Project No. 2744 is issued to 
the licensee for a period effective March 1, 2015 through February 29, 
2016 or until the issuance of a new license for the project or other 
disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new 
license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before 
February 29, 2016, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 
16.18(c), an annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is 
renewed automatically without further order or notice by the 
Commission, unless the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is 
hereby given that the licensee, North East Wisconsin Hydro, LLC, is 
authorized to continue operation of Menominee-Park Mill Hydroelectric 
Project, until such time as the Commission acts on its application for 
a subsequent license.

    Dated: March 4, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05690 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13

- 1 0050 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. CHRISTOPHER EARL RYMAN, also known as Christopher Fred Ryman , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:11

- CR

- 250

- 38

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Earl Ryman has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Ryman has filed response s

. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Ryman ’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court o f Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 17, 2013 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 13-10050 Document: 00512473032 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013No. 13

- 1 0050

claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell , 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s br ief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Ryman ’s response s . We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANT ED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Ryman’s motion to relieve counsel and appoint substitute counsel is DENIED.

2 Case: 13-10050 Document: 00512473032 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013