FORM 10-Q
 
 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 Quarterly Report Under Section 13 or 15 (d)
 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 
 For Quarter Ended
June 30, 2005Commission File Number
0-11720 
 
 Air T, Inc.(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
 
 
 Delaware
52-1206400(State or other jurisdiction of
(I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
Identification No.) 
 
 Post Office Box 488, Denver, North Carolina 28037(Address of principal executive offices) 
 (704)-377-2109 
 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
 
 
 Yes X No
 
 APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:
 
 Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
 
 2,671,293 Common Shares, par value of $.25 per share were outstanding as of July 18, 2005.
 
 
 This filing contains 25 pages.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 1
 
 AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
 INDEX
 
 PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
 
 Item 1. Financial Statements                                                                           Page
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operationsfor the three-months endedJune 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
3Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets atJune 30, 2005 (Unaudited)and March 31, 2005 (Audited)
4 
 Condensed Consolidated Statements of CashFlows for the three-monthsended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (Unaudited)
5 
 Condensed Consolidated Statement of StockholdersEquity and Other Comprehensive Income for thethree-months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004(Unaudited)
6 
 Notes to Condensed Consolidated FinancialStatements (Unaudited)
7-11Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysisof Financial Condition and Resultsof Operations
11-18Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosureAbout Market Risk
18 
 Item 4. Controls and Procedures
18PART II. OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1. Legal Proceedings
19Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
20Signatures
23Exhibit Index
22Officers Certifications
23-25 
 
 2
 
  
 Item 1. Financial Statements
 
 AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
 
 
 Three Months EndedJune 30,2005


2004Operating Revenues:Overnight air cargo

$
11,228,153

$
9,051,128Ground equipment


5,988,148


6,035,70517,216,301


15,086,833Operating Expenses:Flight-air cargo


4,345,200


3,733,347Maintenance-air cargo


5,273,977


3,562,771Ground equipment


4,723,260


4,656,292General and administrative


2,272,398


2,101,893Depreciation and amortization


154,772


160,63216,769,607


14,214,935Operating Income


446,694


871,898Non-operating (Income) Expense:Interest, net


25,226


21,396Deferred retirement expense


5,250


5,250Investment income and other


(33,220
)

(23,213
)(2,744
)

3,433Earnings From Operations Before Income Taxes


449,438


868,465Income Tax Expense


171,368


335,189Net Earnings

$
278,070

$
533,276Basic and Diluted Net Earnings Per Share

$
0.10

$
0.20Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:Basic


2,671,293


2,686,827Diluted


2,671,896


2,713,038See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 
  
 
 3
 
 AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
 
 JUNE 30, 2005


MARCH 31, 2005ASSETS


(Unaudited
)

(Audited
)Current Assets:Cash and cash equivalents

$
3,465,857

$
3,497,659Marketable securities


828,811


812,112Accounts receivable, less allowancefor doubtful accounts of $275,281 at June30, 2005 and $267,194 at March 31, 2005


6,009,110


7,392,700Income taxes receivable


319,021


465,610Notes and other non-trade receivables-current


102,694


116,288Inventories, net


7,151,759


6,102,637Deferred tax assets


568,870


568,870Prepaid expenses and other


75,093


77,447Total Current Assets


18,521,215


19,033,323Property and Equipment


8,278,163


8,597,178Less accumulated depreciation


(5,453,911
)

(5,439,142
)Property and Equipment, net


2,824,252


3,158,036Deferred Tax Assets


389,771


389,771Other Assets


54,635


54,635Cash surrender value of life insurance policies


1,188,000


1,163,000Notes and other non-trade receivables-long term


286,721


310,160Total Assets

$
23,264,594

$
24,108,925LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCurrent Liabilities:Accounts payable

$
4,952,663

$
6,092,186Accrued expenses


2,457,587


2,200,866Current portion of long-term debt and obligations


167,054


191,256Total Current Liabilities


7,577,304


8,484,308Capital Lease Obligations (less current portion)


25,757


29,546Long-term Debt (less current portion)


1,435,219


1,024,052Deferred Retirement Obligations (less current portion)


1,490,987


1,485,466Stockholders' Equity:Preferred stock, $1 par value, authorized 50,000 shares,none issued


-


-Common stock, par value $.25; authorized 4,000,000 shares;2,671,293 shares issued and outstanding


667,823


667,823Additional paid in capital


6,939,357


6,939,357Retained earnings


5,063,542


5,453,105Accumulated other comprehensive income, net


64,605


25,26812,735,327


13,085,553Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity

$
23,264,594

$
24,108,925See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
 
 4
 AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
 
 Three Months EndedJune 30,2005


2004CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Net earnings

$
278,070

$
533,276Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to netcash provided by operating activities:Change in accounts receivable and inventory reserves


2,187


(20,894
)Depreciation and amortization


154,772


160,632Deferred tax benefit


-


(54,451
)Net periodic pension cost


19,999


39,999Change in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cashAccounts receivable


1,375,503


254,854Notes receivable


37,033


25,114Income taxes receivable


146,589


217,760Inventories


(757,203
)

(61,250
)Prepaid expenses and other


(13,304
)

(17,614
)Accounts payable


(1,139,523
)

459,682Accrued expenses and other current liabilities


242,243


140,580Total adjustments


68,296


1,144,412Net cash provided by operating activities


346,366


1,677,688CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:Capital expenditures


(107,007
)

(40,309
)Net cash used in investing activities


(107,007
)

(40,309
)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:Aircraft term loan


(24,202
)

975,000Net borrowings on line of credit


420,674


430,174Payment of cash dividend


(667,633
)

(535,658
)Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities


(271,161
)

869,516NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH & CASH EQUIVALENTS


(31,802
)

2,506,895CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD


3,497,659


459,449CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD

$
3,465,857

$
2,966,344SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:Cash paid during the period for:Interest

$
38,353

$
29,551Income taxes


22,677


171,880SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT NON-CASH INFORMATION:Increase (decrease) in fair value of marketable securities

$
26,041

$
(72,321
)Leased equipment transferred to inventory


(806,728
)

(730,785
)See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 5  AIR T, INC AND SUBSIDIARIES
 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
 AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
 AccumulatedCommon Stock

Additional


Retained


other


TotalPaidIn


Earnings


Comprehensive


Stockholders'Shares


Amount


Capital





Income (Loss
)

EquityBalance, March 31, 2004


2,686,827

$
671,706

$
6,834,279

$
4,127,484

$
43,331

$
11,676,800Comprehensive Income:Net earnings











533,276Change in investment value














(72,321
)Change in fair valueof derivative














13,297Total Comprehensive Income

















474,252Cash dividend($0.20 per share)











(535,658
)




(535,658
)Balance, June 30, 2004


2,686,827

$
671,706

$
6,834,279

$
4,125,102

$
(15,693
)
$
11,615,394AccumulatedCommon Stock

Additional


Retained


other


TotalPaidIn


Earnings


Comprehensive


Stockholders'Shares


Amount


Capital





Income (Loss
)

EquityBalance, March 31, 2005


2,671,293

$
667,823

$
6,939,357

$
5,453,105

$
25,268

$
13,085,553Comprehensive Income:Net earnings











278,070Change in investment value














26,041Change in fair valueof derivative














13,296Total Comprehensive Income

















317,407Cash dividend($0.25 per share)











(667,633
)




(667,633
)Balance, June 30, 2005


2,671,293

$
667,823

$
6,939,357

$
5,063,542

$
64,605

$
12,735,327See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 
 
 6
 
 AIR T, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
 NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 (UNAUDITED)
 
 1. Financial Statement Presentation
 
 The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2005 and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, Stockholders Equity and Comprehensive Income, for the three-months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 have been prepared by Air T, Inc. (the Company) without audit. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of June 30, 2005, and for prior periods presented, have been made.
 
 It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2005. The results of operations for the period ended June 30 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full year.
 
 
 2. Income Taxes
 
 The tax effect of temporary differences, primarily asset reserves and accrued liabilities, gave rise to the Company's deferred tax asset in the accompanying June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005 consolidated balance sheets. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequence of such temporary differences at the enacted tax rate expected to be in effect when the differences reverse.
 
 The income tax provision for continuing operations for the respective three-months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 differ from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of state income taxes and, to a lesser extent, other permanent differences.
 
 
 3. Net Earnings Per Share
 
 Basic earnings per share has been calculated by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. For purposes of calculating diluted earnings per share, shares issuable under employee stock options were considered potential common shares and were included in the weighted average common shares unless they were anti-dilutive. As of June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, 1,000 and 5,000 outstanding stock options were anti-dilutive.
 
 The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows:
 
 
 Three Months EndedJune 30,2005


2004Net earnings

$
278,070

$
533,276Basic and Diluted Net Earnings Per Share

$
0.10

$
0.20Weighted Average Shares Outstanding:Basic


2,671,293


2,686,827Plus: Incremental shares from stock options


603


26,211Diluted


2,671,896


2,713,038   
 7  
 4. Inventories

Inventories consist of the following:

June 30, 2005


March 31, 2005Aircraft parts and supplies

$
687,232

$
767,936Ground equipment manufacturing:Raw materials


5,042,398


3,844,875Work in process


938,071


1,305,891Finished goods


936,021


625,298Total inventory


7,603,722


6,544,000Reserves


(451,963
)

(441,363
)Total, net of reserves

$
7,151,759

$
6,102,637
 
 5.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
 SFAS No. 151, *Inventory Costs* , an Amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. This statement clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted materials should be recognized as current-period charges and requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
 SFAS No. 153, *Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets* , an Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. This statement amends APB 29 to account for non-monetary exchanges at fair value unless the exchanges do not have commercial substance. A non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The guidance is effective for non-monetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
 
 SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), *Share-Based Payment* , which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, *Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation* . Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, *Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees* , and amends SFAS No. 95, *Statement of Cash Flows* . Generally, the approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SAFS No. 123(R) *requires* all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.
 
 SFAS No. 123(R) must be adopted no later than the beginning of the first annual period beginning after June 15, 2005. Early adoption will be permitted in periods in which financial statements have not yet been issued. We expect to adopt SFAS No. 123(R) on April 1, 2006, using the modified prospective method allowed by the statement.
 
 As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company currently accounts for share-based payments to employees using Opinion 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognizes no compensation cost for employee stock options. The impact of adoption of SFAS No. 123(R) cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted SFAS No. 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would not have been material.
 
 The Companys ground equipment subsidiary warranties its products for up to a two-year period from date of sale. Product warranty reserves are recorded at time of sale based on the historical average warranty cost and are adjusted as actual warranty cost becomes known.
 
 Product warranty reserve activity during the three-months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
 
 Three Months EndedJune 30,2005


2004Beginning balance

$
198,000

$
147,000(Reductions) additions to reserve


(7,000
)

45,000Use of reserve


(14,000
)

(41,000
)Ending balance

$
177,000

$
151,000 
 
 8  6.  Derivative Financial Instruments
 
 As required by SFAS No. 133, *Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities* , the Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measures those instruments at fair value.
 
 The Company is exposed to market risk, such as changes in interest rates. To manage the volatility relating to interest rate risk, the Company may enter into interest rate hedging arrangements from time to time.
 
 On October 30, 2003, the Company terminated an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $2,400,000, entered into in May 2001, for $97,500, the fair-market-value termination fee as of that date. The $9,000 balance included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of June 30, 2005 will be ratably amortized into interest expense over the remaining original term of the Companys credit line.
 
 The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2005 the Company had no derivative financial instruments outstanding. The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates on certain portions of its line of credit, which bears interest based on the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 137 basis points. If the LIBOR interest rate had been increased by one percentage point, based on the balance of the line of credit at June 30, 2005, annual interest expense would have increased by approximately $6,600.
 
 7.  Financing Arrangements
 
 In August 2004, the Company amended its $7,000,000 secured long-term revolving credit line to extend its expiration date to August 31, 2006. In order to more closely match the credit lines limits to the Companys financing needs, the credit line limits were amended to $3,500,000 from September 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004 and $7,000,000 from January 1, 2005 to expiration date. The revolving credit line contains customary events of default, a subjective acceleration clause and restrictive covenants that, among other matters, require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. There is no requirement for the Company to maintain a lock-box arrangement under this agreement. As of June 30, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants. The amount of credit available to the Company under the agreement at any given time is determined by an availability calculation, based on the eligible borrowing base, as defined in the credit agreement, which includes the Companys outstanding receivables, inventories and equipment, with certain exclusions. At June 30, 2005, $6,340,000 was available under the terms of the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of the Companys assets.
 
 
 9  Amounts advanced under the credit facility bear interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 137 basis points. The LIBOR rate at June 30, 2005 was 3.34%. At June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, the amounts outstanding against the line were $657,000 and $239,000, respectively.

In March 2004, the Company utilized its revolving credit line to acquire a corporate aircraft for $975,000. In April 2004, the Company refinanced the aircraft under a secured 4.35% fixed rate five-year term loan, based on a ten-year amortization with a balloon payment at the end of the fifth year.

The Company assumes various financial obligations and commitments in the normal course of its operations andfinancing activities. Financial obligations are considered to represent known future cash payments that the Company is required to make under existing contractual arrangements such as debt and lease agreements.
8.  Segment Information
 
 The Company operates three subsidiaries in two business segments, overnight air cargo and ground equipment. Each business segment has separate management teams and infrastructures that offer different products and services. The overnight air cargo segment encompasses services provided primarily to one customer, Federal Express Corporation, and the ground equipment segment encompasses the operations of Global Ground Support, LLC (Global).
 
 The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating income.
 
 Segment data is summarized as follows:
 
 Three months ended June 30,2005


2004Operating RevenuesOvernight Air Cargo:Domestic

$
8,808,826

$
7,584,869International


2,419,327


1,466,259Total Overnight Air Cargo


11,228,153


9,051,128Ground Equipment


5,988,148


6,035,705Total

$
17,216,301

$
15,086,833Operating Income (Loss)Overnight Air Cargo

$
630,415

$
782,206Ground Equipment


405,337


635,468Corporate (1)


(589,058
)

(545,776
)Total

$
446,694

$
871,898Depreciation and AmortizationOvernight Air Cargo

$
103,697

$
116,131Ground Equipment


34,496


30,331Corporate


16,579


14,170Total

$
154,772

$
160,632Capital Expenditures, netOvernight Air Cargo

$
63,629

$
15,257Ground Equipment


10,219


4,232Corporate


33,159


20,820Total

$
107,007

$
40,309As ofJune 30, 2005


March 31, 2005Identifiable AssetsOvernight Air Cargo

$
6,291,127

$
7,312,183Ground Equipment


10,899,143


10,180,943Corporate


6,074,324


6,615,799Total

$
23,264,594

$
24,108,925(1) Includes income from inter-segment transactions.
          10
 9. Commitments and Contingencies

Global and one of its former employees were named as defendants in a lawsuit commenced in March 2002 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia,*Catalyst & Chemical Services, et al. vs Global Ground Support, LLC, et al.,*Case No. 1:02CV00388.  The plaintiffs claimed to have developed a novel method of aircraft de/ant-icing, and alleged that the system was the subject of trade secrets and a patent.  The plaintiffs alleged that Global and its former employee misappropriated the trade secrets, breached a confidentiality agreement, and infringed the patent.  Global asserted counterclaims against the plaintiffs alleging defamation.In May 2004, Global moved for summary judgment on all claims against it and its former employee, and the plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on the patent infringement claim. On December 14, 2004, the Court granted Global's summary judgment motion as to the patent infringement claim and denied the plaintiffs' summary judgment motions entirely. In May 2005, a jury trial was held with respect to the plaintiffs' remaining claims and Global's counterclaims. On May 31, 2005, the jury returned a verdict for Global and its former employee with respect to all of the plaintiffs' claims submitted for trial and for the plaintiffs with respect to the Global's counterclaims. The plaintiffs have appealed the jury's verdict and the court's summary judgment rulings.  Global intends to continue to vigorously defend this matter.

OnFebruary 28, 2005, a 135-foot fixed-stand deicing boom sold in 2003 by Global to the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania airport and maintained by Global collapsed on an Airbus 330 aircraft operated by US Airways. Immediately following this incident, all 12 of the fixed stand deicing booms sold by Global and installed at the Philadelphia airport were placed out of service pending investigation of their structural soundness. These booms include 114-foot smaller deicing booms, as well as additional 135-foot extended deicing booms. All of these booms were designed, fabricated and installed by parties other than Global and are the only booms of this model that have been sold by Global. No legal proceedings have yet been commenced against Global regarding this incident.
 In late June 2005, after Globals investigation identified specific design flaws and structural defects in the remaining 11 booms and Globals subcontractor declined to participate in efforts to return the remaining 11 booms to service, Global agreed with the City of Philadelphia to effect specific repairs to the remaining 11 booms. The agreement establishes time schedules for the completion of repairs to the booms, with the booms to be returned to service during the Companys second and third quarters. Under this agreement, Global agreed to effect these repairs at its expense and has reserved its rights to recover these expenses from any third party ultimately determined to be responsible for defects and flaws in these booms. The agreement provides that if Global performs its obligations under the agreement, the City will not pursue any legal remedies against Global for the identified design flaws and structural defects with respect to these 11 booms. However, the City retains its rights with respect to any cause of action arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. The written document memorializing this agreement has been signed by Global, and Global has been advised by the City of Philadelphia that procedures for its signature are pending.
 
 11
 In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, Global incurred approximately $123,000 in connection with its efforts to have the booms returned to service, which amount is included in Global's operating expense for the period ended June 30, 2005. In addition, as a result of Globals commercial undertaking to repair these 11 booms, it has established a liability for the estimated cost to do so. Due to its uncertain nature, managements estimate of the cost to effect these repairs, which are unique to these products, covers a range of possible amounts, and the Company believes that no single amount in the range is a better estimate than any other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance with applicable accounting rules, Global recorded a liability at June 30, 2005, for $250,000, which is the low end of managements estimated range of $250,000 to $450,000 to effect these repairs. Accordingly, Global recorded an expense for this $250,000 amount which is also included in Globals operating expense for the period ended June 30, 2005.
 
 On August 4, 2005, Global commenced litigation in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania against Glazer Enterprises, Inc. t/a Elliott Equipment Company, Globals subcontractor that designed, fabricated and
 warrantied the booms at the Philadelphia airport, seeking to recover costs incurred in connection with repairing the 11 booms and any damages arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. The Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to recover its repair expenses, or otherwise be successful, in this action.
 
 The Company is currently involved in certain personal injury and environmental matters, which involve pending or threatened lawsuits. Management believes the results of these pending or threatened lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
  
 12
 
 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
 
 Overview
 
 The Company operates in two business segments, providing overnight air cargo services to the express delivery services industry and aviation ground support and other specialized equipment products to passenger and cargo airlines, airports, the military and industrial customers. Each business segment has separate management teams and infrastructures that offer different products and services. The Companys air cargo operations, which are comprised of its Mountain Air Cargo, Inc. (MAC) and CSA Air, Inc. (CSA) subsidiaries, accounted for 65.2% and 60.0% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The Companys ground support operations, comprised of its Global Ground Support, LLC subsidiary (Global), accounted for the remaining 34.8% and 40.0% of revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
 
 MAC and CSA provide short-haul express air freight services primarily to one customer, Federal Express Corporation (the Customer). Under the terms of its Customers dry-lease service agreements which currently cover approximately 98% of the revenue aircraft operated, the Company charges an administrative fee and passes through to its customer certain other cost components of its operations without markup. The cost of fuel, flight crews, landing fees, outside maintenance, parts and certain other direct operating costs are included in operating expenses and billed to the customer as cargo and maintenance revenue, at cost.
 
 Separate agreements cover the four types of aircraft operated by MAC and CSA for their customerCessna Caravan, ATR-42/72, Fokker F-27, and Short Brothers SD3-30. Cessna Caravan, ATR-42/72 and Fokker F-27 aircraft (a total of 92 aircraft at June 30, 2005) are owned by and dry-leased from the Customer, and the Short Brothers SD3-30 aircraft (two aircraft at June 30, 2005) are owned by the Company.
 
 The SD3-30s are operated periodically under wet-lease arrangements with the Customer. Pursuant to such agreements, the Customer determines the type of aircraft and schedule of routes to be flown by MAC and CSA, with all other operational decisions made by the Company.
 
 Agreements are renewable annually and may be terminated by the Customer at any time upon 15 to 30 days notice. The Company believes that the short term and other provisions of its agreements with the Customer are standard within the air freight contract delivery service industry. The Company is not contractually precluded from providing such services to other firms, and has done so in the past. Loss of its contracts with the Customer would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
 
 MAC and CSAs revenues contributed approximately $11,228,000 and $9,051,000 to the Companys revenues for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, a current year increase of approximately 24%. The increase in revenues was related to higher operating cost for flight and maintenance services, in part due to placement of ATR aircraft into revenue service, and acquisition of aircraft parts which was primarily associated with the transition to ATR aircraft. The majority of the current periods revenues increase was comprised of direct operating costs, passed through to the Customer without markup.
 
 Global, which provides the remainder of the Companys revenue, manufactures, services and supports aviation ground support and specialized military and industrial equipment on a worldwide basis. Globals revenue contributed approximately $5,988,000 and $6,036,000 to the Companys revenues for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and
 2004, respectively. The 0.8% decrease in revenues was primarily related to the mix of customer orders during the respective periods.
 
 On February 28, 2005, a 135-foot fixed-stand deicing boom sold in 2003 by Global to the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania airport and maintained by Global collapsed on an Airbus 330 aircraft operated by US Airways. Immediately following this incident, all 12 of the fixed stand deicing booms sold by Global and installed at the Philadelphia airport were placed out of service pending investigation of their structural soundness. These booms include 114-foot smaller deicing booms, as well as additional 135-foot extended deicing booms. All of these booms were designed, fabricated and installed by parties other than Global and are the only booms of this model that have been sold by Global. No legal proceedings have yet been commenced against Global regarding this incident.
 
 In late June 2005, after Globals investigation identified specific design flaws and structural defects in the remaining 11 booms and Globals subcontractor declined to participate in efforts to return the remaining 11 booms to service, Global agreed with the City of Philadelphia to effect specific repairs to the remaining 11 booms. The agreement establishes time schedules for the completion of repairs to the booms, with the booms to be returned to service during the Companys second and third fiscal quarters. Under this agreement, Global agreed to effect these repairs at its expense and has reserved its rights to recover these expenses from any third party ultimately determined to be responsible for defects and flaws in these booms. The agreement provides that if Global performs its obligations under the agreement, the City will not pursue any legal remedies against Global for the identified design flaws and structural defects with respect to these 11 booms. However, the City retains its rights with respect to any cause of action arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. The written document memorializing this agreement has been signed by Global, and Global has been advised by the City of Philadelphia that procedures for its signature are pending.
 
 In the quarter ended June 30, 2005, Global incurred approximately $123,000 in connection with its efforts to have the booms returned to service, which amount is included in Global's operating expense for the period ended June 30, 2005. In addition, as a result of Globals commercial undertaking to repair these 11 booms, it has established a liability for the estimated cost to do so. Due to its uncertain nature, managements estimate of the cost to effect these repairs, which are unique to these products, covers a range of reasonable amounts, and the Company believes that no single amount in the range is a better estimate than any other amount in the range. Therefore, in accordance with applicable accounting rules, Global recorded a liability at June 30, 2005, for $250,000, which is the low end of managements estimated range of $250,000 to $450,000 to effect these repairs. As a result, Global recorded an expense for this $250,000 amount which is also included in Globals operating expense for the period ended June 30, 2005. Accordingly, Global recorded a total expense of $373,000 in the period ended June 30, 2005 in connection with these repair activities.
 
 
 13  On August 4, 2005, Global commenced litigation against its subcontractor that designed, fabricated and warrantied the booms at the Philadelphia airport, seeking to recover costs incurred in connection with repairing the 11 booms and any damages arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. The Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to recover its repair expenses, or otherwise be successful, in this action.
 
 The Companys current forecast for fiscal 2006 assumes that, due to higher fuel cost and the continuation of operating losses in the commercial passenger airlines over the past several years, the commercial aviation industry will grow at a rate that is substantially less than the rest of the economy.
 
 Increased military and Homeland Security budgets, pending funding approvals, may help offset the expected lower than normal order levels from Globals commercial airline customers. Company management currently anticipates that its air cargo customer will continue its aircraft fleet modernization program throughout fiscal 2006, however, future terrorist attacks, competition or inflation may cause delays or termination of certain projects. Given uncertainties associated with the above factors, the Company continues to operate in a highly unpredictable environment.
 Based on the current general economic and industry outlook and cost cutting measures implemented over the past two fiscal years, the Company believes its existing cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations, and funds available from current and renewed credit facilities will be adequate to meet its current and anticipated working capital equirements throughout fiscal 2006. If these sources are inadequate or become unavailable, then the Company may pursue additional funds through the financing of unencumbered assets, although there is no assurance these additional funds will be sufficient.
 
 
 Outlook
 
 Actual results for fiscal 2006 will depend upon a number of factors beyond the Companys control, including, in part, the actual costs incurred to effect the repair of booms at the Philadelphia airport and any related expenses, which may exceed both the $250,000 provision recorded in the period ended June 30, 2005 and the $450,000 high end of the range of these expenses estimated by management, and any recoveries of these expenses from third parties, including Globals subcontractor. Actual results will also depend on future significant increases in rate of inflation, including fuel prices, the timing, speed and magnitude of the economic recovery, military funding of pending future equipment orders, future levels of commercial aviation capital spending, future terrorists acts and weather patterns.
 
 
 Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
 The preparation of the Companys financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires the use of estimates and assumptions to determine certain assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Management bases these estimates and assumptions upon the best information available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The Companys estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from estimates. The most significant estimates made by management include allowance for doubtful accounts receivable, reserves for excess and obsolete inventories, warranty reserves, deferred tax asset valuation, retirement benefit obligations, valuation of revenue recognized under the percentage-of-completion method and valuation of long-lived assets.
 
 Following is a discussion of critical accounting policies and related management estimates and assumptions.
 
 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts receivable in the amount of $275,000 and $267,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, was established based on managements estimates of the collectability of accounts receivable. The required allowance is determined using information such as customer credit history, industry information, credit reports, customer financial condition and the collectability of outstanding accounts receivables associated with a business segment discontinued in 2003. The estimates can be affected by changes in the financial strength of the aviation industry, customer credit issues or general economic conditions.
 
 Inventories. The Companys parts inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Reserves for excess and obsolete inventories in the amount of $452,000 and $441,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, are based on assessment of the marketability of slow-moving and obsolete inventories. Estimates are subject to volatility and can be affected by reduced equipment utilization, existing supplies of used inventory available for sale, the retirement of aircraft or ground equipment and changes in the financial strength of the aviation industry.
 
 The Company warranties its ground equipment products for up to a three-year period from date of sale. Product warranty reserves are recorded at time of sale based on the historical average warranty cost and are adjusted as actual warranty cost becomes known.
 
 Product warrant reserve activity during three-months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows:
 
 Three Months EndedJune 30,2005


2004Beginning balance

$
198,000

$
147,000(Reductions) additions to reserve


(7,000
)

45,000Use of reserve


(14,000
)

(41,000
)Ending balance

$
177,000

$
151,000
 
 
 Deferred Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities, net of valuation allowance in the amount of $85,000, as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005 reflect the likelihood of the recoverability of these assets. Company judgment of the recoverability of these assets is based primarily on estimates of current and expected future earnings and tax planning.
 
 
 14  Retirement Benefits Obligation. The Company currently determines the value of retirement benefits assets and liabilities on an actuarial basis using a 5.5% discount rate. Long-term deferred retirement benefit obligations amounted to $1,490,000 and $1,485,000, respectively, as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005. Values are affected by current independent indices, which estimate the expected return on insurance policies and the discount rates used. Changes in the discount rate used will affect the amount of pension liability as well as pension gain or loss recognized in other comprehensive income.
 
 Revenue Recognition. Cargo revenue is recognized upon completion of contract terms and maintenance revenue is recognized when the service has been performed. Revenue from product sales is recognized when contract terms are completed and title has passed to customers. Revenues from overhaul contracts on customer owned parts, certain labor service contracts and long term fixed price manufacturing projects are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method. Billings in excess of cost and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts under percentage of completion amounted to $0 as of June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005 .
 
 Valuation of Long-Lived Assets. The Company assesses long-lived assets used in operations for impairment when events and circumstances indicate the assets may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than their carrying amount. In the event it is determined that the carrying values of long-lived assets are in excess of the fair value of those assets, the Company then will write-down the value of the assets to fair value. The Company has applied the discontinued operations provisions of SFAS No. 144 *Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets* to the business segment the Company discontinued in 2003 and has reflected any remaining long-lived assets associated with the discontinued operation at zero fair market value at June 30, 2005.
 
 Seasonality
 
 Globals business has historically been highly seasonal. Due to the nature of its product line, the bulk of Globals revenues and earnings have typically occurred during the second and third fiscal quarters in anticipation of the winter season, and comparatively little has occurred during the first and fourth fiscal quarters. The Company has continued its efforts to reduce Globals seasonal fluctuation in revenues and earnings by broadening its product line to increase revenues and earnings in the first and fourth fiscal quarters. In June 1999, Global was awarded a four-year contract to supply deicing equipment to the United States Air Force (USAF), and in June 2003 Global was awarded a three-year extension on the contract. The Company believes the USAF contract contributed to managements plan to reduce seasonal fluctuation in revenues during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The remainder of the Companys business is not materially seasonal.
 
 
 Results of Operations
 
 Consolidated revenue increased $2,129,000 (14.1%) to $17,216,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to its equivalent 2004 period. The increase in revenues primarily resulted from an increase in air cargo revenues related to direct operating costs, passed through to the Companys Customer at cost, as detailed above in Overview.
 
 Operating expenses increased $2,555,000 (18.0%) to $16,770,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to its equivalent 2004 period. The net increase in operating expenses consisted of the following: cost of flight operations increased $612,000 (16.4%) primarily as a result of increased costs associated with fuel, landing fees, pilot staffing and pilot travel, due to higher oil prices and Customer flight schedule changes; maintenance expense increased $1,711,000 (48.0%) primarily as a result of increases in the volume of aircraft parts purchased for ATR aircraft and cost of outside maintenance, maintenance personnel, cost of travel and contract services, related to customer fleet modernization; ground equipment operating expenses increased $67,000 (1.4%), as a result of the $250,000 product repair provision and $123,000 product repair expenses for Global, as discussed in Overview above, partly offset by decreased cost of parts and supplies and contract services related to the mix of customer orders; depreciation and amortization decreased $6,000 (3.7%) as a result of certain capital assets becoming fully depreciated; and general and administrative expense increased $171,000 (8.1%) primarily as a result of increased staff expense, professional fees, in part, incurred with respect to efforts to restore the Philadelphia deicing equipment to service, as described above, and utilities.
 
 The current periods decreased operating income ($425,000) (48.8%) resulted primarily from cost incurred and accrued in relation to repair of fixed-stand deicing equipment sold by the ground equipment subsidiary, see Overview above, and increased operating cost associated with the air cargo segment, partly offset by a higher profit margin production mix in the ground equipment sector.
 
 Non-operating expense, net decreased $6,000 as a result an increase of earnings on marketable securities, partly offset by an increase in interest expense due to higher levels of borrowing in the three-month period ended June 30, 2005.
 
 Pretax earnings decreased $419,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 compared to 2004, principally due to the above stated ground equipment segments product repair cost and increases in current period operating costs related to the air cargo segment.
 
 The provision for income taxes for the three-month period ended June 30, 2005 decreased $164,000 compared to the 2004 period, primarily due to decreased current period pretax earnings.
 
 
 15
 Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
 As of June 30, 2005 the Company's working capital amounted to $10,944,000, an increase of $395,000 compared to March 31, 2005. The net increase primarily resulted from an increase in inventories and decrease in accounts payable, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable.
 
 In August 2004, the Company amended its $7,000,000 secured long-term revolving credit line to extend its expiration date to August 31, 2006. In order to more closely match the credit lines limits to the Companys financing needs, the credit line limits were amended to $3,500,000 from September 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004 and $7,000,000 from January 1, 2005 to expiration date. The revolving credit line contains customary events of default, a subjective acceleration clause and restrictive covenants that, among other matters, require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios. There is no requirement for the Company to maintain a lock-box arrangement under this agreement. As of June 30, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all of the restrictive covenants. The amount of credit available to the Company under the agreement at any given time is determined by an availability calculation, based on the eligible borrowing base, as defined in the credit agreement, which includes the Companys outstanding receivables, inventories and equipment, with certain exclusions. At June 30, 2005, $6,340,000 was available under the terms of the credit facility. The credit facility is secured by substantially all of the Companys assets.
 
 Amounts advanced under the credit facility bear interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 137 basis points. The LIBOR rate at June 30, 2005 was 3.34%. At June 30, 2005 and March 31, 2005, the amounts outstanding against the line were $657,000 and $239,000, respectively.
  In March 2004, the Company utilized its revolving credit line to acquire a corporate aircraft for $975,000. In April 2004, the Company refinanced the aircraft under a secured 4.35% fixed rate five-year term loan, based on a ten-year amortization with a balloon payment at the end of the fifth year.
 
 The Company assumed various financial obligations and commitments in the normal course of its operations and financing activities. Financial obligations are considered to represent known future cash payments that the Company is required to make under existing contractual arrangements such as debt and lease agreements. A table representing the scheduled maturities of the Companys contractual obligations as of March 31, 2005 was included under the heading Contractual Obligations on page 14 of the Companys 2005 Annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 17, 2005. There were no significant changes from the table referenced above during the quarter ended June 30, 2005.
 
 The Company has not currently, nor in the past, engaged in the use of structured finance arrangements, known as off-balance sheet financing transactions, with unconsolidated entities or other persons.
 
 The respective three-month periods ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 resulted in the following changes in cash flow: operating activities provided $346,000 and $1,678,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively, investing activities used $107,000 and $40,000 in 2005 and 2004, respectively, and financing activities used $271,000 in 2005 and provided $870,000 in 2004. Net cash decreased $32,000 and increased $2,507,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
 
 Cash provided by operating activities was $1,331,000 less for the three-months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the similar 2004 period, principally due to decreased accounts payable and increased inventory, partly offset by decreased accounts receivables in the current period.
 
 Cash used in investing activities for the three-months ended June 30, 2005 was approximately $67,000 more than the comparable period in 2004 due to increased current period capital expenditures.
 
 Cash used in financing activities was $1,141,000 more in the 2005 three-month period than in the corresponding 2004 period due to prior period aircraft financing and an increase in the current period cash dividend.
 
 16
 There are currently no commitments for significant capital expenditures. The Companys Board of Directors on August 7, 1998 adopted the policy to pay an annual cash dividend, based on profitability and other factors, in the first quarter of each fiscal year, in an amount to be determined by the Board. The Company paid a $0.25 per share cash dividend in June 2005.
 
 
 Derivative Financial Instruments
 
 As required by SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, the Company recognizes all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measures those instruments at fair value.
 
 On October 30, 2003, the Company terminated an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $2,400,000, entered into in May 2001, for $97,500, the fair-market-value termination fee as of that date. The $9,000 balance included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of June 30, 2005 will be ratably amortized into interest expense over the remaining original term of the Companys credit line.
 
 The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. As of June 30, 2005 the Company had no derivative financial instruments outstanding. The Company is exposed to changes in interest rates on certain portions of its line of credit, which bears interest based on the 30-day LIBOR rate plus 137 basis points. If the LIBOR interest rate had been increased by one percentage point, based on the balance of the line of credit at June 30, 2005, annual interest expense would have increased by approximately $6,600.
  
 Deferred Retirement Obligation
 
 Contractual death benefits for the Companys former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer who passed away on April 18, 1997 are payable by the Company in the amount of $75,000 per year for 10 years from the date of his death. As of June 30, 2005, $64,000 has been reflected as a current liability and $90,000 has been reflected as a long-term liability associated with this death benefit.
 
 
 Impact of Inflation
 
 If interest rates continue to rise, the Company believes the impact of inflation and changing prices on its revenues and net earnings could have a material effect on its manufacturing operations if the Company cannot increase prices to pass the additional costs on to its customers. Although the Companys air cargo business can pass through the major cost components of its operations, without markup, under its current contract terms, higher rates of inflation could affect our customers current business plans.
 
 
 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
 
 Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included in Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
 17
 
 Item 4. Controls and Procedures
 
 As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures with respect to the information generated for use in this report. Based upon, and as of the date of that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms, and that management will be timely alerted to material information required to be included in the Companys periodic reports filed with the Commission.
 
 There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during or subsequent to the first quarter of fiscal 2005 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 
 It should be noted that while the Companys management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, believe that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures provide a reasonable level of assurance, they do not expect that the disclosure controls and procedures or internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within
 the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
 
 18
 
 
 
 PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION
 
 Item 1. Legal Proceedings
 
 Global and one of its former employees were named as defendants in a lawsuit commenced in March 2002 in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, *Catalyst & Chemical Services, et al. vs Global Ground Support, LLC, et al.,* Case No. 1:02CV00388.  The plaintiffs claimed to have developed a novel method of aircraft de/ant-icing, and alleged that the system was the subject of trade secrets and a patent.  The plaintiffs alleged that Global and its former employee misappropriated the trade secrets, breached a confidentiality agreement, and infringed the patent.  Global asserted counterclaims against the plaintiffs alleging defamation. In May 2004, Global moved for summary judgment on all claims against it and its former employee, and the plaintiffs moved for summary judgment on the patent infringement claim. On December 14, 2004, the Court granted Global's summary judgment motion as to the patent infringement claim and denied the plaintiffs' summary judgment motions entirely. In May 2005, a jury trial was held with respect to the plaintiffs' remaining claims and Global's counterclaims. On May 31, 2005, the jury returned a verdict for Global and its former employee with respect to all of the plaintiffs' claims submitted for trial and for the plaintiffs with respect to the Global's counterclaims. The plaintiffs have appealed the jury's verdict and the court's summary judgment rulings.  Global intends to continue to vigorously defend this matter.
 
 On February 28, 2005, a 135-foot fixed-stand deicing boom sold in 2003 by Global to the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania airport and maintained by Global collapsed on an Airbus 330 aircraft operated by US Airways. Immediately following this incident, all 12 of the fixed stand deicing booms sold by Global and installed at the Philadelphia airport were placed out of service pending investigation of their structural soundness. These booms include 114-foot smaller deicing booms, as well as additional 135-foot extended deicing booms. All of these booms were designed, fabricated and installed by parties other than Global and are the only booms of this model that have been sold by Global. No legal proceedings have yet been commenced against Global regarding this incident.
 
 In late June 2005, after Globals investigation identified specific design flaws and structural defects in the remaining 11 booms and Globals subcontractor declined to participate in efforts to return the remaining 11 booms to service, Global agreed with the City of Philadelphia to effect specific repairs to the remaining 11 booms. The agreement establishes time schedules for the completion of repairs to the booms, with the booms to be returned to service during the Companys second and third fiscal quarters. Under this agreement, Global agreed to effect these repairs at its expense and has reserved its rights to recover these expenses from any third party ultimately determined to be responsible for defects and flaws in these booms. The agreement provides that if Global performs its obligations under the agreement, the City will not pursue any legal remedies against Global for the identified design flaws and structural defects with respect to these 11 booms. However, the City retains its rights with respect to any cause of action arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. The written document memorializing this agreement has been signed by Global, and Global has been advised by the City of Philadelphia that procedures for its signature are pending.
 
 On August 4, 2005, Global commenced litigation in the Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania against Glazer Enterprises, Inc. t/a Elliott Equipment Company, Globals subcontractor that designed, fabricated and warrantied the booms at the Philadelphia airport, seeking to recover costs incurred in connection with repairing the 11 booms and any damages arising from the collapse of the boom in February 2005. The Company cannot provide assurance that it will be able to recover its repair expenses, or otherwise be successful, in this action.
 
 The Company is currently involved in certain personal injury and environmental matters, which involve pending or threatened lawsuits. Management believes the results of these pending or threatened lawsuits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
 
 
 19
 
 
 
 Item 6. Exhibits
 
 (a) Exhibits
 
 No.   Description
 
 3.1
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2001 
 3.2
By-laws of the Company, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1996 
 4.1
Specimen Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 1994 
 31.1
Certification of Walter Clark 
 31.2
Certification of John J. Gioffre 
 32.1
Section 1350 Certification 
 __________________
 
 
 
 
 
 20
 SIGNATURES
 
 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 AIR T, INC.
 
 By:  /s/ Walter Clark
 Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 Date: August 5, 2005
 
 
 By:  /s/ John J. Gioffre
 John J. Gioffre, Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
 Date: August 5, 2005
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  21
  
 AIR T, INC.
 EXHIBIT INDEX
 
 
 
 Exhibit Number
Document31.1
Certification of Walter Clark31.2
Certification of John Gioffre32.1
Section 1350 certification 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 22