alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

					NO. 2-05-381-CR

LESLIE JAMES FERGUSON	 						APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS	STATE

	----------

	FROM COUNTY CRIMINAL COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered appellant's “Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  The motion substantially complies with rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure, so we will treat it as a motion to withdraw appellant’s notice of appeal.  Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).  No decision of this court having been delivered before we received this motion, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.  See id.; Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	WALKER, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and MCCOY, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: December 8, 2005
* Honorable Richard Mills, U.S. District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting by designation. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. No. 94-4595. LIFECARE INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED, a California corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CD MEDICAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, C.D. Medical, B.V., a Dutch corporation, Defendants-Appellants. May 31, 1996. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (No. 90-283-CIV-FAM), Federico A. Moreno, Judge. Prior report: 11th Cir., 68 F.3d 429. Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, HILL, Senior Circuit Judge, and MILLS * , District Judge.
BY THE COURT: The motion to recall the mandate filed by Movant Craig Edward Stein is GRANTED. We modify and supplement our opinion in this case with this observation: The statements by the Court in discussing the issues raised in this appeal concerning alleged bias on the part of Mr. Stein are based upon the record created by the parties to this case. As a nonparty, Mr. Stein was not entitled to present evidence or otherwise to respond to the allegations. Thus, the statements in the opinion should not be interpreted to represent conclusions of the Court about the actual conduct of Mr. Stein.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

WORLDSOURCE ENTERPRISES, LLC, ECO AGRO 

RESOURCES, LLC, ECO WORLD GROUP LLC,

Appellants

v.

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF 

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES 

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

______________________ 

2021-1041

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. PGR2019-

00046.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

DAVID MATTHEW WILKERSON, The Van Winkle Law 

Firm, Asheville, NC, argued for appellants. 

 KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States 

Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for 

intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS 

Case: 21-1041 Document: 80 Page: 1 Filed: 06/10/2022
W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA, AMY J. NELSON, FARHEENA 

YASMEEN RASHEED. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

June 10, 2022

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 21-1041 Document: 80 Page: 2 Filed: 06/10/2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JASON O’NEIL

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§

§ No. 38 , 2018

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 1107024171A (K )

§

§

§

Submitted: November 2 , 2018

Decided: December 14 , 2018

Before VALIHURA

, SEITZ

, and TRAYNOR

, Justices.

ORDE R

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we

conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons assigned by the Superior Court’ s opinion , dated December 18, 2017

,

denying the appellant ’s first motion for postconviction relief.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior

Court is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0375. ROBINSON v. THE STATE.

The appeal in this case was docketed on September 23, 2016. Appellant’s

counsel subsequently filed a Suggestion of Death, showing that Appellant passed

away on September 26, 2016. Appellant’s death rendered his appeal moot. Dorsey v.

State, 272 Ga. 283 (528 SE2d 257) (2000); Grogan v. State, 248 Ga. 312 (283 SE2d

899) (1981); Buttrum v. State, 248 Ga. 306 (283 SE2d 899) (1981). Accordingly, this

appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/10/2016

November 10, 2016
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in each of Registration Statements
No. 333-22571 and No. 333-93209 of Edge Petroleum Corporation (the "Company") on
Form S-8 and in Registration Statement No. 333-79759 of the Company on Form S-3
of our report dated March 19, 2001 appearing in the Annual Report on form 10-K
of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2002 and to the reference to us
under the heading "Experts" in each such Registration Statement and in each
Prospectus to which any such Registration Statement relates.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

October 16, 2003
**Exhibit 23.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements No. 333-29885, 333-81813, 333-54688 and 333-115871 on Form S-8 of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. of our report dated March 19, 2007, except as to notes 1(c), 1(m), 1(q), 10, 11, 12 and 19,which are as of February 29, 2008, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensiveincome (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related financial statement schedules I and II, which report appears in the December 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K ofHungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. 

Our report on the consolidated financial statements dated March 19, 2007 except as to notes 1(c), 1(m), 1(q), 10,11, 12 and 19, and schedule I which are as of February 29, 2008, refers to (1) the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, and (2) the restatement of the consolidated financialstatements to reflect the correction of errors in accounting for embedded derivatives, revenue recognition on certain multiple element arrangements, stock based compensation and income taxes. 

KPMG Hungária Kft. 

Budapest, Hungary 

February 29, 2008
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0 
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          (416)
<OTHER-SE>                                        (416)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0 
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.00) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.00)
        

</TABLE>
REF l-B·~A§S442, ~ •. ~ 

MAGIC--FAR EAST SUMMARY 

No. 254 

29 Nov 44 

i If 

... - "' ... 

'1 r 

-', r ._, I 

I', I . . I 

I I ~. \ I I 

•I I 

'\,,,. ., C I ,. It -:-, I J 

3. Japanese Analysis of 20th Bomber Command Communications: 

!.· On 20 Nov the Eigh~h Area Army at Rabaul sent to 

Tokyo an analysis of B-29 communications in the .Marianas 

(FES 25 Nov 44). Six days later a "special intelligence" (J5463) unit at Rangoon forwarded to Tokyo its analysis of 20th 

Bomber Command communications in India and China. The report is prefaeed with ·the statemep.t that it may serve as "a 

reference for your intercept intelligence on the bomber 

command at Ss.ipan and its plans for bombing the Tokyo area. 11 

The accuracy of the details or the report ~an be determined 

only in the field, and 1 t has been forifarded to the 20th 

and the 2l~t Bomber Commands. 

b. The message.discloses that, on the basis of a 

study of Allied communications, the Japanese have reached 

the following conclu~ions: 

(1) ''When the B-29's move from the Calcutta bases 

to th~ bases around Chengtu for an attack against Japan, incoming and outgoing t~affic (using the call, signs of 

the B-29 bases) increases sharply on the U. S. communications 

system, and the a~r-ground communications system also shows 

active use. The same is true on the r-eturn trip [to Indig." . (2) The difference between B-29 1 s and transport_planes can·be determined by "a study of the air-ground Lmesse.gey ~ddressed to a number of planes every day," despite the 

fact that "no orders concerning B-29 movements are transmitted in P.lain text and plane types are almost never 

disclosed. ' -

(}) The ~mminence of a B-29 attack is indicated by a 

period of "restriction" in communicatiQns to Chengtu. That 11restriction" lasts for a period of about 9 to 20 

hours. ,LApparently the Japanese means that the length or· 

the'!restriction" has varied with the length of.th~ missio!Y• 

, '(4) The type or equipment used is "crystal {_Controf/ 

transmission" .LWhich is the radio equipment actually use2J. 

(5) The most commonly u~ed frequency is 8000 Kcs• 

lfhe 20th Bomber Command has reported th.at 8280 Kcs has 

been found to be the most satisfactory fr~quency~ 

(6) The B-29's·use two codes--one when in the vicinity of Chengtu, and the other when on tactical missions. 

~ Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit
32.2
   Certification
of Treasurer & Controller
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   Paul
Sledz, Principal Accounting Officer of Comtex News Network, Inc. (the “Company”)
certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he has reviewed the
Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008 and
that to the best of his knowledge:
  1.
              the
      report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
              the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
  The
purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63, Section
1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
   February 10,
    2009
              /s/ Paul SledzPaul
      SledzTreasurer
      & ControllerPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>         5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION FROM THE FORM
10-KSB FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>      1,000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                            1996
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      231
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4846
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   15296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1287
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       14009
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     15296
<SALES>                                             85
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    85
<CGS>                                             1016
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1016
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    10
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (673)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (673)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (673)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
'c •'. 

< 

.. , 

' . ·• . , .;:·.. .. ~Cvr_~~·~v~J·~··- $_,~ e.·· w~AR~lf>A~~1104ae .· u . ,~, .... :. ~ . 

·· "':~:·." .. . · . ·CLASSIFIED MESSA.GE .. CENTER ·· · - ,. · ·. .· 

... ··. ·,'.; .,. ·· :JNCOMTJ\J:G. ·CLASSIFIED ME~SSAGE1 _,:_:,. • •• ··~- . . ~ . . ' . 

PABAPIDV\GE NOT BE0Uimrn ~- · HANDliE Af'!, ee~I!fflfO'P-IJ:.I, ·coHJlti;$POl'IDF.1'JCrn 

}?ER ;PA}iAsi '<il?- and. 60,~ ( !~) ~ 1\R 380= 15· 

_,·, " .... ~ ' 

. . ,f..1~uy N~:irY and .. S:t~te Depts do 11ot approve Joint ~ode 

'.{bOora.s a~ sugge_sted you:v o? Oc.~1 16,.. Co.d:t:ng may be,, done in. · 

aajacen'.b' roomn ori :<mils .fc:n.<i mut'l~~l }>r-otection ~:ncr aa tna11:v' 

message .cent~~-~ ,.011e1.,a,tlo!1.s as .poasl'ble except·. cod:b;1g·_ ·Ul?l:Y be t~ra!.1:1'bin ed ~' . . . . . . . 

End 

·. .. ' .. ' ' U-. .. · 'X" .-v.t. _:. )•1-dct-t4:>.~., . · . ~ .·· i . " . . '- . ~ . ._;., • _, .- ~; L, , 1 i\..,;;v>:"'·•· f )7.,.t;;v-r~ 1 - . J .,,,___ •.< I qi;..., ~er;,.,, /C' ,1 "I v -- . • . . . (f (/ 

-~~~10 

(.22 oc:~: ·47) :· . DTO· -17/3 P);J.\ wm : 

NSA on 04-16-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 
'. 

' - ' .1 

': 

. ' ,,.. ... -- ........ 

,i• '·· . i . ~·'· " 

-~- ,. 

, ". 

1:"' .. ,.. 

_-. .,, 

. ..,-

.. __ -:- ' -

r~. 

·~. 

-,. . """ 

·', ;- . . -.:.~ 

·' . 

. c 

'· .-

r'_ 

/ 

_-!'-

., ."'.. 

_ .. 

. i :·' 

·•I\· 

.,;_: ... 

-!'
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

June 8, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

129816(172) 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

TAXPAYERS OF MICHIGAN AGAINST Justices 

CASINOS and LAURA BAIRD, State 

Representative in her official capacity, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

 SC: 129816 

v CoA: 225017

THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Defendant-Appellee,

and 

 Ingham CC: 99-090195-CZ 

GAMING ENTERTAINMENT, LLC and 

LITTLE TRAVERSE BAY BANDS OF 

ODAWA INDIANS,

Intervening Defendants-Appellees,

and 

NORTH AMERICAN SPORTS 

MANAGEMENT CO.,

 Intervening Defendant. 

______________________________________ 

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by Senators Ken Sikkema and 

Shirley Johnson for leave to file a brief amicus curiae is considered and it is GRANTED. 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 8, 2006 

Clerk
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">Elio Casamassima, Plaintiff- <br><br>against<br><br>Golden Gate Cafe Inc., Defendant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Joseph E. Capella, J.) entered April 27, 2016, which granted defendant's CPLR 3211(a)(7) motion to dismiss the complaint.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Appeal from order (Joseph E. Capella, J.), entered April 27, 2016, dismissed, without costs.</p><p>Inasumuch as plaintiff-appellant failed to submit opposition papers to the underlying motion, the resulting order was entered upon plaintiff's default within the meaning of CPLR 5511 and is therefore nonappealable (<i>see Benitez v Olsen</i>, 29 AD3d 503 [2006];<i> Fox v T.B.S.D., Inc., </i>278 AD2d 612 [2000], <i>lv denied </i>96 NY2d 716 [2001]).</p><p>Plaintiff's remedy was to move to vacate the default (<i>see Figiel v Met Food</i>, 48 AD3d 330 [2008]).</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur <p>Decision Date: November 22, 2016</p><br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 23




                           INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Metris Companies, Inc.:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.:
333-42529, 333-42961, 333-52627, 333-52629, 333-78345, 333-36924, 333-51390,
333-91917, and 333-60870 on Form S-8 333-60973, 333-47066, 333-82007 on Form
S-3; and 333-43771 and 333-86695 on Form S-4; and 333-88178 on Form S-8 of
Metris Companies Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2003, except as to note 2,
which is as of April 2, 2004, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Metris Companies Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the
related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2002, which report appears in the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-KA
of Metris Companies Inc.

Our report refers to a change in accounting methods for derivative instruments
in 2001 and a change in accounting method for recognizing revenue for debt
waiver products in 2000.

Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 9, 2004
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2214 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase the ability of 

Medicare and Medicaid providers to access the National Practitioner 

Data Bank for the purpose of conducting employee background checks. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Ms. ROSEN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to increase 

the ability of Medicare and Medicaid providers to access 

the National Practitioner Data Bank for the purpose 

of conducting employee background checks. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Promote Responsible 

5 Oversight and Targeted Employee background Check 

6 Transparency for Seniors Act’’ or the ‘‘PROTECTS Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2214 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERMITTING MEDICARE AND MEDICAID PRO2 VIDERS TO ACCESS THE NATIONAL PRACTI3 TIONER DATA BANK TO CONDUCT EMPLOYEE 

4 BACKGROUND CHECKS. 

5 Section 1921(b)(6) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1396r–2(b)(6)) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and other health care entities 

8 (as defined in section 431 of the Health Care Qual9 ity Improvement Act of 1986)’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

10 other health care entities (as defined in section 431 

11 of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 

12 1986), providers of services (as defined in section 

13 1861(u)), suppliers (as defined in section 1861(d)), 

14 and providers of items or services under a State plan 

15 under this title (or a waiver of such a plan)’’; and 

16 (2) by striking ‘‘such hospitals or other health 

17 care entities’’ and inserting ‘‘such hospitals, health 

18 care entities, providers, or suppliers’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
. 

, 

. 

·' ~ 

REF ID:A54951 

SECf~E .. T 

1. !hit Director baa eatabliAhed • polie;y to tile et!eei that ~rimental, 

dneloprr.nt.J., or enctncerin£ modela ot equipeent vUl not ba aade &Yaileble w 

•at i-c-q-dreent• of an openatJDnal netun. Inelo•ed 1• • letter bom the 

Director to the Chief or leval Opentione whlch emmciate• thu pol1q. Although 

tbo letter deal.a with a epccU'ic rcquaat.a it eon~ain1 • pneral statement. et 

poliq an:11 t.herotora1 1e tranll!ittett tor Wo:neat'cm aid £Uidance. 'l'bD Direetoa> 

bu elnco roaffi.r1Md thie pol1qy with nepect to othor 11q1J.1pr.enta. 

1. !b1I l'>iJ'oator -. illllicat.ed that :l.n '"1r! event ot a nquoat rf4' an 

acap\1on to t.hla polic7 i. w1ll lllke the ua1e1on nth.er t..'-n delee,ate thn 

a11thorit.J'. Tbia dooe nett• m 8lQ' .,, piwolude tha corduc't o~ 1.eew which 

m:, bl ••eent1al in the dn1·lor..-nt ot an equi~t. 

J. !bl ••t.ablirsbed polic;y ""'1ta onl) appl-ovod proct11ct10n JIOd.el• of° 

mMS!C eqi.lipr.ant to he ueed in .tultll.Unr. operut1oml nquinnorate. DD/0~1M:l!C 

la r.aponelbla tor 1ibe !ntroducUon ot thou aodelllJ therefore,. it Ml requoatad \hat DO co=tl.t-icnta for operational •!"Plication be ..ie vith>ut prior concu.tnnd) 'b7 t.b.111 oftlce. FlU't.ber requ.esta tor excopt.i.one to thia pol.t.q ebo:tld 'be 

ie.terred to DD/l~l C who will ottain dea!elon fl'Oll tha Direct.or 1lt each 1natanca. 

Illcl• 

a/• 

1. ,.. • 

~ a.c..tC:W: 1.) 

Colone~ USAF Dop-~ty Director 

Coa:mntca.tiona Seaur1:q1 

----Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

----