US Deportment 

of Transpor1otion 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

November 18, 20 14 

Steven Rivituso and Patricia Rivituso 

Parents of Anthony Rivituso 

1112 Woodbridge Way 

West Chester, PA 19380 

Dear Mrs. and Mr. Rivituso: 

Exemption No. Ill 00 

800 Independence Ave . S W 

Washington. DC 20591 

Regulatory Docket No. F AA-20 14-0829 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis. and lists the conditions and limitations ofthc exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Occision 

By letter posted October l 0, 2014, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Anthony Rivituso for an exemption from § 121 .31 1 (b) of Title 14. Code of 

Federal Regulations ( 14 CFR.). That exemption, if granted, would allow Anthony to exceed 

the specified weight and/or height limit for an FAA-approved child restraint system (CAReS, 

manufactured by AmSafc Corporation) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard 

a United States (U.S.) aircraft. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Anthony. 

The FAA has issued grants of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that numerous people with physical challenges had previously completed flights using 

restraint systems that addressed unique physical needs regarding satety. support and security 

in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the 

petition would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons 

with disabilities. 

AFS-14-051-E 
petition would not set any new precedents regarding the usc of restraint systems by persons 

with disabilities. 

Having reviewed your reasons tor requesting an exemption. I find that2 

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9834: 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant or exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. ~§ I 06(1), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me. I hereby grant Anthony Rivituso an exemption from 

§ 121.311 (b). In addition. any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 

while Anthony is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121 .311 (b) to the 

extent necessary to allow him to usc an FAA-approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft. 

All operations under this exemption must be conducted with at least one of Anthony's parents 

or a caregiver accompanying him. Anthony Rivituso may only occupy a passenger seat with 

no passenger seated behind him. In addition. Anthony's parent or caregiver must carry a copy 

of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 

hours b<.:ftHc the date or each tlight. 

This exemption terminates on September 31 , 2019. unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely.~~~ J1.. 

John Barbagallo 

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service 

Enclosure