alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Re: WEGO Chemical CASRN 84-65-1 Requests for exemption to submit 

testing results to EPA 

Paul Campanella to: Cuthbert Frederick 02/07/2012 03:43 PM

Cc: Jerry Cook

From: Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US

To: Cuthbert Frederick <CFrederick@wegochem.com>

Cc: Jerry Cook <jcook@cpc-us.com>

Cutty, If you imported any amount of CASRN 84-65-1 on or after the effective date of the final rule ( 

February 7, 2011) then you are still subject to the rule. Your decision to not import any of this chemical 

has no effect on whether you are subject to the rule. 

40 CFR 799.5089 (HPV 3) states the following:

(b) Am I subject to this section? (1) If you manufacture (including import) or intend to manufacture, or 

process or intend to process, any chemical substance listed in Table 2 in paragraph (j) of this section 

at any time from February 7, 2011 to the end of the test data reimbursement period as defined in 40 

CFR 791.3(h), you are subject to this section with respect to that chemical substance.

For your information , EPA has received a letter of intent to test from the Chemical Products 

Corporation. This letter (attached) is in the public docket. You may want to contact Jerry Cook of 

CPC to suggest ways you can share costs of doing this test.

LOI Chem Prod Corp EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531-0585.pdf

Paul J. Campanella, Ph.D.

Chemical Information and Testing Branch

Chemical Control Division

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Washington, D.C. 

202-564-8091

Cuthbert Frederick Paul, Wego Chemical & Mineral corp. has decid... 02/07/2012 10:27:19 AM

From: Cuthbert Frederick <CFrederick@wegochem.com>

To: Adam Cohen <ACohen@wegochem.com>, Paul Campanella/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "B. Eshaghpour" <BEshaghpour@wegochem.com>, Ed Khalily <Khalily@wegochem.com>

Date: 02/07/2012 10:27 AM

Subject: WEGO Chemical CASRN 84-65-1 Requests for exemption to submit testing results to EPA

Paul,

Wego Chemical & Mineral corp. has decide to no longer import 

9, 10-Anthracenedione (Anthraquinone), CAS #84-65-1. 

We have not imported any product in 2012 and will only 

distribute product bought locally in the USA.

 

Hence we will not be providing data for this product. 
Regards, 

Cuthbert (Cutty) Frederick,

WEGO Chemical & Mineral Corp.

239 Great Neck Road

Great neck, NY 11021
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14248 and #14249]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Maine (FEMA—4208—DR), dated 03/12/2015. *Incident:*
                         Severe Winter Storm, Snowstorm, and Flooding *Incident Period:*
                         01/26/2015 through 01/28/2015 *Effective Date:*
                         03/12/2015 *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/11/2015 *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/14/2015
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/12/2015, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Androscoggin, Cumberland, York. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14248B and for economic injury is 14249B.
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Joseph P. Loddo, Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2015-06332 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of CPAC, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000351717
<NAME> CPAC, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                      18,304,286
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,192,269
<ALLOWANCES>                                   589,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,243,553
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            50,282,762
<PP&E>                                      25,621,561
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,149,312
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              70,800,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,053,482
<BONDS>                                      6,806,693
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,432
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,996,240
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                70,800,952
<SALES>                                     22,023,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,023,718
<CGS>                                       11,733,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,733,628
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             136,738
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,822,201
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,145,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,677,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,677,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
1 

### T o n g, St a nl ey

Fr o m: K a l a m C h e ung < kc h e ung @a q m d.g ov>

S e nt: T hur s d ay

, F e b ru a r y 04

, 2016 8 : 13 AM

T o: T o ng, St a nl e y ; Sh ea r s

, J a mes

C c: S a ng

- M i L ee ; Jo e Ca ss m ass i; Ed M u e hl b ac h er

S u b j ec t: 2014 O zo n e R A CT SI P

- R ul e 1106 a nd R ul e 1128

H i S t a n a nd J i m

,

In r e s p o n s e t o t h e i nqu iri e s r e la te d t o R u l e 1 1 0 6 a nd R u l e 1 1 2 8

, i t is t o t h e b e s t o f s t aff’s k n o w l e dg e t h a t :

R u l e 1 1 0 6

O n l y o n e a c t i v e T i t l e V s h i p y ar d facili t y is s ub j e c t t o R u l e 1 1 0 6

. S C A Q M D e ng i n ee r c o n t a c te d t h e f a cili t y i n

J a nu ar y 2 0 1 6 a nd c o n fir m e d t h a t i n o r g a n i c z i n c c o a t i n g is n o t u s e d a t t h e facili t y

.

R u l e 1 1 2 8

O u t o f t h e ac t i v e T i t l e V fa c ili t i e s t h a t d o n o t u s e a dd

- o n c o n t r o ls f o r t h e c o a t i ng o p e ra t i o n s s ub j e c t t o R u l e

1 1 28

, n o f a cili t i e s e x c ee d t h e C T G a pp lica b l e t h r e s h o l d o f 25 t p y o f V OC p e r c o a t i ng li n e

.

P l e a s e l e t u s k n o w if y o u h a v e a n y qu e s t i o n s o r c omm e n t s

. T h a n k y o u.

Ka l am Cheun g, Ph .D

Air Q u a l i t y S p ec ia l is t

- Air Q u a l i t y Mo d el i ng

S o u t h C oas t Air

Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m en t D is t r i ct

Ph o ne : 909

- 396

- 32 81

Fa x: 909

- 396

- 3 2 52

k cheun g @ a q m d .g ov
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 13 - 0446 Directorate ID : 20 10 - SW - 007 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model EC135 P1, P2, P2+,T1, and T2+ Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 214 He licopters in the US Registry . Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect and replace each bearing subject to binding, which could lead to subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter (if necessary to replace the bearing) $ 50 Labor per Helicopter ( 10 work- hour s x 

### $ 8 5 /work
hour for the inspection ) $ 850
Other

– 3 additional work hours to replace a bearing and 3 additional work hours to repair the floor at a minimal cost for materials Total Cost per Helicopter $ 8 50 Total US Fleet Cost $ 181,900 for the inspection assuming no bearings are replaced. Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Matt Fuller
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

People of Michigan v Candice April Sorreis 

Docket No. 327369 

LC No. 14-022310-FH 

Cynthia Diane Stephens 

Presiding Judge 

Deborah A. Servino 

Elizabeth L. Gleicher 

Judges 

The Court orders that the October I 0. 2016 opinions are hereby AMENDED to correct a 

clerical error. The opinions arc corrected to read ovember 10, 2016 as the date of the opinions. 

In all other respects. the opinions remain unchanged. 

NOV 16 2016 

Date 

~'? Gl- hic~
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17I0059. ROBERT L. LAFONTAINE et al. v. MARK S. ALEXANDER et al. 

Robert L. LaFontaine and Diane F. LaFontaine, plaintiffs in this action, have

filed an application for interlocutory review of the trial court’s order denying their

motion to vacate a previous order, and granting in part the defendants’second motion

for summary judgment. The defendants filed a first motion for summary judgment

in 2010, which the trial court granted in part on May 11, 2011. The defendants filed

a second motion for summary judgment in June 2016. Subsequently, the LaFontaines

filed a motion to vacate the trial court’s May 11, 2011 order. On September 21, 2016,

the trial court issued an order denying the LaFontaines’ motion to vacate, and

granting in part the defendants’ second motion for summary judgment. In their

application for interlocutory review of that order, the LaFontainesstate that they have

filed a direct appeal of the order as well. 

Asrecognized by the LaFontaines, the grant of summary judgment on any issue

or as to any party is reviewable by direct appeal. See OCGA § 9-11-56 (h); Olympic

Dev. Group v. American Druggists’ Ins. Co., 175 Ga. App. 425 (1) (333 SE2d 622)

(1985). Thus, the order that the LaFontainesseek to appeal is directly appealable and

is notsubject to the interlocutory appeal requirements. In addition, all rulings within

that order and any other non-final rulings entered in the case may be challenged as

part of such a direct appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (d); Southeast Ceramics v. Klem,

246 Ga. 294, 295 (1) (271 SE2d 199) (1980).

Ordinarily, when a party files a timely application for interlocutory review of

an order that is subject to direct appeal, we will grant the application. See Spivey v.

Hembree, 268 Ga. App. 485, 486, n.1 (602 SE2d 246) (2004). Here, however, the

November 02, 2016
LaFontaines state in their application that they have filed a notice of appeal of the

trial court’s order. Accordingly, this application is superfluous and is hereby

DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/02/2016
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00360-CR

Ivan William SANCHEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2006CR8845

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due on September 26, 2016. On September 22, 2016, we 

granted appellant an extension to October 26, 2016. Appellant has not filed his brief. 

We ORDER appellant’s attorney, Edward Shaughnessy, to file appellant’s brief on or 

before December 2, 2016. If appellant’s brief is not filed by that date, we will abate this appeal 

to the trial court for an abandonment hearing. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2). Contempt proceedings 

may also be initiated against appellant’s attorney. Id. 38.8(b)(4). 

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 17, 2016

p1110

Order 

Clerk

November 17, 2016

153687

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153687

COA: 324870

Cheboygan CC: 01-002488-FH

LAWRENCE LEE BYARD,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 15, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

The Board of Directors 

Harbor Bankshares Corporation 

Baltimore, Maryland 

 

We herebyconsent to the inclusion of our report dated February 19, 2005 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Harbor Bankshares Corporation (the “Corporation”) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements ofincome, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then ended in the Corporation’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

**Stegman & Company**

/s/ Stegman & Company 

Baltimore, Maryland 

March 21, 2005
Cominch File 

FF1/A8 

Se:rio.l 001275 

BEOREl'f 

REF ID:A61227 

SEGFUi!Te 

c 0 p y 

UNITED STATES FLEET 

HEADQUARTERS JF THE COMMANDER IN CHIEF 

NAVY DEPARTMENT 

WASHINGTON, D. 0 

26 June 1943 

t-1:EMORANDUM FOR THE VICE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS. 

Suoject 

Reference· 

Reorganization of ~aval Intelligence. 

(a) VCNO Memo of 12 June 1943 and related 

memoranda. 

1. I agree with the comments in .rour memorandum of 12 June 1943. 

2. A Comoat Intelligence Division is neing established tn my Headquarters This Division will combine the Intelligence sections of Plans ~na Operations and undertaKe certain work formerly 

a.one by ONI 

3. Communication tntelligence (Op-ro-G) will not be changed but tne Comoat Intelligence Division mentioned in ~aragraoh 2 

will ta~e charge if the evaludtion of information from this 

source The Far Eastern section of ONI will not handle communication intelligence ln the future. 

4. I desire that investigation work. being done by ONI be confined 

to necessary counter-intelligence investigations, ena to those 

\here tne subjects are under naval Juriauiction. 

5 I desire that efforts to cooru1nate the work of ONI, MIS and 

OSS CD!~lnue The focmation ~f Joint Intelligence Collecti0n 

Agencies ana the Joint production of field monographs ar~ steps in this direction. Duplication of work and effort must be 

,voided 

6. I agree with the comments in parsgrDph 4 of your memorandum 

of 12 June 1943. 

/s/ E J. KING 

c 0 p y 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 01-30-2014 

SEeRE+
p.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

38) IV-E-26 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:28 AM Sheet 38 of 105 
P.2 

A-83-27 ' RADIAN IV F ?fi 

CORPORATIO N iv-L-<:o 

TELEPHONE CALL REPORT 

DATE: October 29, 1986 

TO: Mr. Gary Boersen 

Surface Water Quality - Permit 

P. 0. Box 30028 

Lansing, Michigan 48909 

(919) 733-5083 

FROM: Phillip A. May, Radian Corporation , / M <.fc--l 

SUBJECT: Sodium Scrubber Discharge j i o^^ ' ^v1

^^ 

Mr. Boersen statea that all discharges, whether they are from a 

scrubber unit or from/a publically owned treated works, must meet the staie--ir J-- ^ 

effluent guidelines^ An-eftf-hient guide44no is a concentration limit used in 

permitting a now source. The impact of a new source'is evaluated bjriv/ .? iffx- r >'' 

A 4, • *' '-lzte^-^h-

r

 +hc,>t:f-£i-'-1'^l.uG-t:tj src^'-f^ iXu 'j< .^(.xt ., .. 

ere. determinate, pollution-concontrationc 'in a receiving water body If Lim 

discharge were to-oeeur. Tne-concentrat ion, limits are GaHed waler u,uaTtty 

-^vfceH-ar The TDS,GiM4eria in Michigan is 500 mg/1iter^ This {evel is <X-Myi u 

Mr. Boersen also stated that he felt there would be problems with c/u.jj M.-^, 

T^':'- C.'ICrK7 cilX.\c--,<f5 

permitting a scrubber at Dow in Midland because ttey- are*already at their 

44M4^or%Hdrarge. He felt there GouTePlfc other locations in the state 

where this migfrf also be the case* but did not know of any. 

Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O Boy 13000/Resoarch Triangle Park. N C. 27709/(919)54 1 -9100 
P.3 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

1 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 

TRANSMITTAL 

TO: 

A-./4/A/;- /* 

\i-Jli.r; ( jJ-srfi CfCXni.o. 

Fo £», /.looo 

~-> 

rfe^o. ri. r- /nc -xL t^h. Mc 

± y 

FOR ACTION AS INDICATED ^7?o7 

D SIGNATURE 

D APPROVAL 

D ACTION 

• COMMENTS 

D INFORMATION 

• REPLY-MV SIGNATURE 

D REPLY-COPY TO ME 

D PLEASE SUMMARIZE 

• PLEASE INVESTIGATE 

• NOTE AND FORWARD 

• NOTE AND FILE 

• NOTE AND RETURN 

D PLEASE PHONE ME 

D FORWARDED PER REQUEST D PLEASE SEE ME 

• RETURN W/YOUR RECOMMENDATIONS 

REMARKS: 

R 1147 Rev. 2/79
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Martha L. Long, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Shelter Properties III;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  November 19, 2007

/s/Martha L. Long

Martha L. Long

Senior Vice President of Shelter Realty III Corporation, equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Videotron Ltd.



|                               |  |                                              
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
Organization
|                               | 
|9227-2590 Québec inc.          |  | Québec                                       
|                               | 
|9230-7677 Québec inc.          |  | Québec                                       
|                               | 
|Jobboom inc.                   |  | Canada                                       
|                               | 
|Le SuperClub Vidéotron ltée    |  | Québec                                       
|                               | 
|Videotron G.P.                 |  | Québec                                       
|                               | 
|Videotron Infrastructures Inc. |  | Canada                                       
|                               | 
|Videotron L.P.                 |  | Québec                                       
|                               | 
|Videotron US Inc.              |  | Delaware