alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2075 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2075

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
            gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2021

Mr. Bennet (for himself and Mr. Cassidy) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from 
            gross income for AmeriCorps educational awards.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Segal AmeriCorps Education Award Tax 
Relief Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF AMERICORPS EDUCATIONAL AWARDS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (B), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (C) 
and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(D) a national service educational award under 
                subtitle D of title I of the National and Community 
                Service Act of 1990.''.
    (b) Exclusion of Discharge of Student Loan Debt.--Subsection (f) of 
section 108 of such Code is amended by adding at the end the following 
new paragraph:
            ``(6) Payments under national service educational award 
        programs.--In the case of an individual, gross income shall not 
        include any amount received under a national service 
        educational award under subtitle D of title I of the National 
        and Community Service Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12601 et seq.).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than April 3, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:

                    1.                     *Oliver Pierce Smith,*                     Neenah, Wisconsin; to retain voting shares of First Menasha Bancshares, Inc., Neenah, Wisconsin, and thereby indirectly retain voting shares of First National Bank-Fox Valley, Neenah, Wisconsin.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 16, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-06320 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

                    Certification of Chief Executive Officer
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

         I, Dr. George Rozakis,  Chief Executive Officer of Implantable  Vision,
Inc. (the "Registrant"),  do hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as adopted  pursuant to Section  906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that,
based upon a review of the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
January 31, 2008 of the  Registrant,  as filed with the  Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"):

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Registrant.


                         By: /s/ Dr. George Rozakis
                         ---------------------------------
                         Name: Dr. George Rozakis
                         Title: Chief Executive Officer

March 24, 2008

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

         This  certification  accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the  Registrant  for purposes of
ss.18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been  provided to the  Registrant  and will be retained  by the  Registrant  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          64,632
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   98,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,756
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,416
<PP&E>                                          34,167
<DEPRECIATION>                                  25,437
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,868
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,464
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           303
<OTHER-SE>                                     115,345
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,868
<SALES>                                        179,138
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               179,138
<CGS>                                           76,251
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,251
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                74,895
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,817
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,459
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,358
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,358
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.62
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
        


</TABLE>
",,_(~::. I••:; 

... 

• -c" . . . 

t .. · .. ~- . •. :.,. . • 11, I.! 

......... .. _...,, 

... 

. ·:~. ..'/ I ~ • 

.:_, · ·: 

: ·.·,:· . : . : ·.·· ·:, .1.. ' . • ...... !· 

' . 

. j" ·' 

' ·I : ':",: 

'":;· . • 1'."· 

.. :·;.:r::: 

. ! 

·! 

·l 

i : . ... 

_., 

I 

··:·; ;:/;· ' :'" , ... 

~ .~:· : :, 

•·'I I 

!· 

. ~ ' 

.·. 

~ : . . . .. -:· :~:·~-::·-~;:· 

~. -··:·: 

. , ~ • I ' : .... • 

··.·.· 

. : .... 

. -~ .. : .. . . . ... 

REF ID:A521766 

No- ~. 0 ~'ls", ll v 

I M t ·o 4- ~T:L ... 

" ) :StSD~-~-

. i.· 

JA\pproved 'fbr Release by NSA on 11-18-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ . ,··· 

., 

; . 

\ 

"! 

.. ·.:.··· 

.. · ... .. ·;·~ .. 

:" , ... 

·' ··.1· · .. I 

I. .'• .'"'" 

I 

i. 
REF ID:A521766 

I u.r;·~ 

/; 

/5;,?s/~~)il l 

r 

I 

.. .. ~......... .. ·;:; :-:;-~~:~-;=·- ...... ::· .. ib~·fie· 

~-.
Exhibit 99.4

             Resolution of the Board of Directors of March 23, 2004 amending
        2002 Stock Option Plan, subject to stockholder approval

     RESOLVED, that subject to stockholder approval, the Board of Directors does
hereby adopt and approve an increase in the number of shares covered by the Plan
from 325,000 to 650,000 and that Section 6) of the 2002 Stock Option Plan is
amended to read as follows:

     "The total number of shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance by the
Company either directly or underlying Options granted under this Plan from
inception to date is 650,000. The total number of shares of Common Stock
reserved for such issuance may be increased only by a resolution adopted by the
Board of Directors and amendment of the Plan. Stockholder approval of such
increase or other Modification of the Plan within one year of Effective Date
shall be required in the event Incentive Stock Options are granted or to be
granted under the Plan. Common Stock issued under the Plan may be authorized and
unissued or reacquired Common Stock of the Company."
.... .. . - / ;z.._ /~F~rt.:A4 ffB-f (}at, 

? 0 r 11-ry 9 ,.< 2-_ 

~7·.d;,~-1 

)I~ ~- "1--~L~--

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 11-06-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3 
... - "' •J REF ID:A488108 

II 

. ' . 

. . Pt. ~Jj······~··----...·· ~~4'i~-~ ····~·~· . - - -- - - -- ··------- -- -· ------ -- ----· --- -- -- -- ---- --- ------- - --·-

-- - - . - - - -- - ~- -
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

In the Matter of Northeastern Aviation Corp., Respondent 

FAA Docket No. FAA-2014-0206 

Case No. 2011EA110045 

Judge Sullivan 

AGENCY'S WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

The Agency, under 14 CFR Section 13.215 and pursuant to a settlement 

agreement, withdraws its Complaint in this matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant Chief Counsel 

for En 

By: 

Attorn y 

Federal viation Administration 

Office ofthe Chief Counsel 

Enforcement Division, Nmiheast Team 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

T: 718-553-3278 

F: 718-995-5699 

E: Camille.Castillo@FAA.GOV 

1 

Dated: APR 1 2 2016 

RECEIVED 

APR t 8 2016 

HEARING DOCKe:T 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of 

Complaint were sent first class mail and fax as follows: 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of 

Complaint were sent first class mail and email as follows: 

Mr. Edward J. Longosz, TI 

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellot, LLC 

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, 12trh Floor 

Washington, DC 20006 

ELongosz@eckeJiseamans.com 

I hereby certifY that on this day copies of the foregoing Agency's Withdrawal of 

Complaint were sent first class mail as foilows: 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

_A,_tterrti0n: He~:ir:g D0ck~t Clerk, .l\._GC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2W1 000 

Date: APR 1 L 2016 li'--1111'-- M. Facey 

Paralegal Specialist 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

2
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44079

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JACOB PAUL RAINES,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 782

Filed: November 21, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Timothy L. Hansen, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and consecutive unified sentences of five years 

indeterminate for unlawful possession of a firearm and five years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of 

methamphetamine, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Reed P. Anderson, 

Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Jessica M. Lorello, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Jacob Paul Raines pled guilty to one count of unlawful possession of a firearm, Idaho 

Code § 18-3316; one count of possession of methamphetamine, I.C. § 37-2732(c); and one count 

of misdemeanor domestic battery, I.C. §§ 18-903(a), 18-918(3). The district court imposed an 

indeterminate term of five years for unlawful possession of a firearm and a consecutive sentence 

of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of 

methamphetamine. The sentence imposed for misdemeanor domestic battery was 223 days in 
2

jail, with 223 days’ credit for time served. Raines appeals, contending that his unlawful 

possession of a firearm and possession of methamphetamine sentences are excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Raines’s judgment of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
#### Randles, Respondent, vs. Waukesha County, Appellant.

*June 12*

*June 24, 1897.*

*Counties: Inability for horse taken by sheriff.*

A county is not liable for the value of a horse which had been taken from its owner by the sheriff while in pursuit of a felon for whose arrest he had a warrant, and had been overdriven and injured in the pursuit.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha-county: WakhaM Paiixs, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

The undersheriff of *WauJceshco*county had a warrant for the arrest of a man who was charged with robbery. The felon fled and the officer pursued. The officer’s horse failed. He took the plaintiff’s horse, continued the pursuit, and overtook the felon. In the pursuit, the plaintiff’s horse was over-driven and injured. The plaintiff brought action against the county for the value of the horse, and recovered judgment. The county appeals.

*T. W. ParMnson,*for the appellant.

*P. J. HemloolC)*for the respondent.

NewmaN, J.

This, surely, must be a case of first impression, for no precedent for it is found. It has never been supposed that any duty rested on the county to furnish.the *630sheriff’s officers with horses to ride or drive in. the service of .process. It has usually been understood that such officers took their offices *cum onere,*and furnished their own conveyance.

The officer, in making this arrest, was not the servant of the county, and the county is not liable for his action. He was engaged in a service due to the general public, and of no particular interest to *Waukesha*county, as a political organization. *Kuehn v. Milwaukee,*92 Wis. 263, and the cases cited. In such cases the county is not liable for the acts of its officers, unless such liability is put upon it by some statute. Ho statute declares a liability for such an act as this.

Something is said in the argument about the power of the sheriff to call out the *posse comitatus.*Ho statute declares the liability of the county to persons called by the sheriff to form the *posse.*But the *posse comitatus*includes only the men of the county. It does, not include the horses. The sheriff has no *ex-officio*power to call out the horses.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Todd Okeith Smith, Appellant

No. 06-16-00108-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 276th District Court of 

Marion County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. F14488). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Moseley participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the judgment 

of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment to reflect that the offense of 

conviction is a state jail felony. As modified, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

We note that the appellant, Todd Okeith Smith, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 16, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ VIRNETX INC., Appellant

v.
APPLE, INC., Appellee

______________________
2016

- 1480

______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/001,949.

______________________
Decided: December 9, 2016

______________________
I GOR V ICTOR T IMOFEYEV , Paul Hastings LLP, Was hington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by N AVEEN M ODI , J OSEPH P ALYS , D ANIELLE R UTH A CKER S USANJ , D ANIEL Z EILBERGER

.
J OHN C. O'Q UINN , Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by N ATHAN S. M AMMEN ; J EFFREY P AUL K USHAN , Sidley Austin LLP, Washington, DC.

______________________VIRNETX INC

. v. APPLE , INC

. 2

Before O’M ALLEY , M AYER , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges.
O’M ALLEY , Circuit Judge. This appeal concerns the validity of VirnetX Inc.’s (“VirnetX”) U.S. Patent No. 8,051,181 (“the ’181 patent”), disclosing technology for establishing secure communic ation over networks. Apple Inc. (“Apple”) challenged all claims of the ’181 patent in a request for i nter partes reexaminati on, Control No. 95/001,949 . The Patent and Trademark Office granted reexamination and rejected all 29 claims as unpatentable. On appeal, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) affirmed. Specifically, the Board’ s final dec ision found claims 1

– 12, 14, 15, and 17 – 29 anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 6,496,867 to Beser (“Beser” ), claims 1, 2, 7

– 9, 12

– 17, 19

– 21, and 24

– 29 anticipated by U.S. Patent No. 6,131,121 to Mattaway (“Mattaway”), and claims 1– 15, 18

– 23, and 28

– 29 antic ipa ted by U.S. Patent No. 6,557,037 to Provino (“Provino”). VirnetX now appeals to this court.
After full review of the record and careful consider ation, w e find no error in the Board’s claim constructions or finding s with respect to the Mattaway and Provi no refe rences, which together cover all claims of the ’181 patent. We do not, therefore, need to reach the merits of the Board’s decision with respect to Beser.
AFFIRMED
| **CERTIFICATIONS** | **EXHIBIT  31.1** |
|--------------------|-------------------|

 

I,Casey J. Sylla, certify that:

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Allstate Life InsuranceCompany;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

a)                        Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)                       Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)                        Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

a)                        Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)                       Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| August 8, 2006 |                                |
|----------------|-------------------------------------|
|           | /s/   Casey J. Sylla      |
|           | Casey J. Sylla                      |
|           | Chairman of the Board and President |

 

E-4

----