alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

                               TELXON CORPORATION

                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                     (In Thousands Except Per Share Amounts)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Three Months                        Six Months
                                                                   Ended September 30,               Ended September 30,
                                                                  1997            1996              1997             1996
                                                             -------------    -------------     -------------    -----------

<S>                                                              <C>             <C>               <C>             <C>     
Net income (loss) applicable to 
       common shares                                             $2,388          $(4,702)          $3,982          $(9,499)
                                                                 ======          =======           ======          =======

Weighted average common shares outstanding 
       for the period                                            16,273           16,182           16,027           16,265
                                                                 ======           ======           ======           ======

Earnings (loss) per common share:
       On the weighted average common
           shares outstanding for the period *                     $.15            $(.29)            $.25            $(.58)
                                                                   ====            =====             ====            =====


<FN>
*        This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item
         601(b)(1) although not required for income statement presentation
         because it results in dilution of less than three percent. The
         Company's 5-3/4% Convertible Subordinated Notes and 7-1/2% Convertible
         Subordinated Debentures were omitted from the fully diluted calculation
         due to their antidilutive effect.
</TABLE>
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 22 

To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 

Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 22, 2021 

Ms. LUMMIS (for herself and Mr. BARRASSO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National 

Monument, Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEVILS TOWER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The mountain at the Devils 

5 Tower National Monument, Wyoming, located at 

6 44°35′26′′N, by 104°42′55′′W, and the area located at 

7 44°35′21′′N, by 104°41′48′′W, shall be known and des8 ignated as ‘‘Devils Tower’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 22 IS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

2 regulation, order, document, paper, or other record of the 

3 United States to the mountain and area described in sub4 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘‘Devils 

5 Tower’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 2, 2011

/s/Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       ---------------

                                                       Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

**CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 2, 2011

/s/ Robert E. Wolfe

                                                          --------------

                                                         Robert E. Wolfe

                                                         Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
}~.~r-:--:~u· '.:, ~· •. -lif 6fQRE:J; e ~~-~~-~;~t"Office Memorandum • UNITED sTATEs GOVERNMENT 

!- ' ........ : - ' I • ' PL 86-36/50 .U$C 3605 

'TO AFSA-00".r. E0.3. 3 (h)( 2 )" DATE 26Julyl951 .. ;..: . 

. .. · ·capt: Lane . 

-· ~ ... ; FROM .,, ,_ 

Report by Mr. Miller on Russian Sophistication I 

~~~"- · · -·-~· · 1. · ·According to Mr. Miller, the report is a\dr~t of' one which he will 

:._. · ftlb_~t ~!? the Jle~ _meeting of the Security Committee ~f USCIB with the recom-

'" · hlell9at:f.on t~a:t it pe presented to USCIB for approval. If' USCIB approves the 

- •. _writ;ing :01f su~h a report, it will presumably be referred back to the Security 

. . 

, :Oommittee--ror-preparation. Mr. Miller indicated that in his opinion it whould 

• be p;ri:ipa;r~~ within A;FSA;_ Capt. _Wenger would probably designate the office of 

_ preJ?aration • 

. '. 

.. 

3 0 • Mr. Miller 1s report was written from memory, wit•·OUt reference t.o the 

• exact reports •. It is a summari of ertinent information which be obtained 

• • '.f'rom TI COM sources, 

.. 

The Polish monograph to which 

:ret.erence i~ _made . _s a monogra.p men one a. in Flicke 1 s history of the German 

criPtologic 9ffort and in the Russian lectures on cryptographic security. It 

has hot been .found in the captured material, but is known only by r~f'erence. 

T~ mo!\ographs C?_°f. 'bzar:i.st Russian Secret 1-olice are not part o!. the TICuJ,:i series 

but, come f~om published works • . .. , . .... , ... ,, .. · .. 4. · I noted that Mr. Rowlett 's reaction to the project was not too favorable, 

main1y in'view of the enormous amount of work which AFSA-02 has. He app~rently 

·fel~ t~t the P~?ject was not one of too r-igh importance~ If the study is done, 

.~it would s~em tha~ AFSA-254 would be bhe best place for it to be done -- since they 

. ·:8.re _ a~;i-~aw fang.l~ar wi'!ih the type of information wanted; they are able and cor.ipetent 

:,. ·.;rese8.X'ch~rs, and already lmow the TICOM field comparatively well. Al.most all of 

. '· :,the \?a.ckgroung material would come from TICOM or related sources. This is the type 

of" project which has been attempted on numerous occasions before and has not been 

ft\'1 - ca.rtied out -- if AFSA-254 could undertake it, it would probab'.cy be worth doing, 

· J ~,.l but)it se~ms doubtful if AFSA-24 itself could s~end the time on the project at the 

i~.o.i~e~t t_we. I dt' ~tt:RET 'lJut.. .-~~~~.,,':~l~ ·-. eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 08-07-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352
-... '/" ~ 

~ ~J ....._.... ~ )1 

PRE-FLIGHT CHECKLIST* 

HULL AND PROPELLORS 

D !All hull screws are securely fastened to the body of the UAS. 

D !All propellers are securely fastened to the motors. 

D ttransmitters and accompanying wires are securely fastened to the hull. 

D ICam.era(s), gimbal(s), and accompanying wires are securely fastened to the hull. 

D fThere are no loose parts, wires, screws, or extremities that can fall from the UAS. 

!OPerators Notes: 

SAFETY CHECK 

D fThe operator performed a visual review of the area of operation. 

D fThe operator is aware of aerial obstructions (i.e., poles, structures, utility wires, trees). 

D fThe operator is not within 3-miles of an airport. 

D fThe operator clearly marked a take-off/landing zone with 4 orange caution cones. 

D fThe operator has clearly announced that a UAS is preparing for flight. 

D fThe operator has ensured no persons or animals are near the caution zone. 

D !Weather permits the safe operation of the UAS (i.e., little to no wind, no precipitation, 

D fworking in pairs, the second operator has a pair of binoculars to maintain line of sightl 

!OPerators Notes: I 

POWER TO SYSTEM 

D tth.e battery being placed into the UAS has a full ca:Qacitv charge. D e batteries inside the RC controller have a sufficient charge. 

D ere is a spare UAS battery with a full charge. 

D ere are spare batteries for the RC controller with a full charge . 

D e UAS battery is securely fastened within the UAS hull 

D e UAS powers up completely indicating a nonnal audible chime of operability. 

D !An lights on the UAS are operatin~ normall . 

pPerators Notes: 

D fihere is a steady connection between the RC controller and the UAS. 

D fThere is a steady connection between the video transmitter and the FPV receiver. 

D fThe UAS is responding accurately and efficiently to RC commands. 

D tyideo equipment is responding accurately and efficiently to FPV commands. 

D !FPv OSD is operational. 

D IRe Controller is set to GPS and HL and CL modes are both turned off. 

!OPerators Notes: 

SATELLITE CONNECTIVITY 

D I UAS is indicatim!; full satellite/GPS connectivity. 

D I UAS has set the ''home" location. 

D I Following take-off, UAS successfully completes a 1 0-second unassisted hover. 

IQPerators Notes: 

I 

I 

~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiil-., UAS Operator's Signature: __________ _ Date: _______ _ 

"' All UAS Operators must perform this pre-flight dlecklist prior to every respective flight.
EXHIBIT 11

                 WHITMAN EDUCATION GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
           COMPUTATION OF NET (LOSS) INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                            ===================================
                                                             JUNE 30, 1997        JUNE 30, 1996
                                                            =============       ===============
<S>                                                          <C>                <C> 

Primary:
Average shares outstanding .............................      12,677,582           10,428,323

Net effect of dilutive stock options and warrants
     based on the treasury stock method using the
     average market price ..............................              --            2,276,534
Sanford-Brown shares held in escrow ....................              --            1,021,612
                                                            -------------        ------------

Total ..................................................      12,677,582           13,726,469
                                                            =============        ============

Net (loss) income ......................................    $ (1,370,823)        $     76,017
Per share amount .......................................    $      (0.11)        $        .01

Fully diluted:
     Average shares outstanding ........................      12,677,582           10,428,323
Net effect of stock options and warrants based on
     the treasury stock method using average quarter
     and quarter-end market prices .....................         870,294            2,508,131
Sanford-Brown shares held in escrow ....................              --            1,021,612
                                                            -------------        ------------

Total ..................................................      13,547,876           13,958,066
                                                            =============        ============


Net (loss) income ......................................    $ (1,370,823)        $     76,017
Per share amount .......................................    $      (0.10)        $        .01

</TABLE>

Net (loss) income per share of common stock for primary  purposes is computed by
dividing net (loss) income by the weighted average number of shares  outstanding
during the period adjusted for common stock  equivalents  when such  adjustments
result in dilution of earnings per share.  The Company has considered all common
stock  equivalents for purposes of calculating  fully diluted earnings per share
regardless of their dilutive affect.  Included as common stocks  equivalents for
the three months ended June 30, 1996 for fully  diluted  proposes are  1,021,612
shares issued in connection with the acquisition of  Sanford-Brown  College that
remained in escrow to be disbursed to the seller or returned to the Company upon
the occurrence of, or failure to achieve certain events.
#### The State ex rel. Kmart Corporation, Appellant, *v.*Frantom et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Kmart Corp. v. Frantom*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 430.]

(No. 97-1655

Submitted August 25, 1999

Decided September 15, 1999.)

*Pickrel, Schaeffer & Ebeling, David C. Korte*and *Michelle D. Bach,*for appellant.

*E.S. Gallon & Associates*and *Richard M. Malone,*for appellee Frantom.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Cordelia A. Glenn,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Per Curiam.*

Appellant, Kmart Corporation (“Kmart”), moved appellee Industrial Commission of Ohio (“commission”) for permission to depose a specialist who had pronounced former Kmart employee appellee Virginia Frantom permanently and totally disabled from her work-induced injury. The commission denied Kmart’s motion, and Kmart requested a writ of mandamus to overturn that decision before the commission could either grant or deny Frantom’s application for permanent and total disability compensation. The Court of Appeals for *431Franklin County denied the writ, holding that mandamus is not available to challenge an agency’s interlocutory discovery order.

We affirm. In *State ex rel. McKim v. Hobart Corp.*(1991), 58 Ohio St.3d 99, 568 N.E.2d 670, we unanimously rejected an employee-claimant’s request for a writ of mandamus to compel the commission to grant her permission to depose a doctor. We held that the commission’s discovery order could not be reviewed in mandamus because the writ cannot be used to create an appeal from an order that is not final. *Id.*at 100, 568 N.E.2d at 670-671, citing *State ex rel. Sobczak v. Show*(1990), 49 Ohio St.3d 13, 14, 550 N.E.2d 455, 456. Accord *State ex rel. Williams v. Moody’s of Dayton, Inc.*(1982), 1 Ohio St.3d 238, 1 OBR 260, 438 N.E.2d 1162 (denial of deposition order reviewed in mandamus after commission determined extent of disability and granted compensation). But, see, *State ex rel. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v.*Indus. *Comm.*(1989), 47 Ohio St.3d 78, 547 N.E.2d 1173 (denial of deposition order reviewed in mandamus prior to disposition of claimant’s application for permanent total disability compensation and without court comment on the lack of finality). We are not persuaded to abandon this established rule on the basis of Kmart’s arguments that the commission’s order was wrong and unfair.

The court of appeals’ judgment, therefore, is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 26, 2019

t1118

Order 

Clerk

November 26, 2019

158949

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158949

COA: 344224 

Calhoun CC: 2017-002612-AR

MICHAEL JOSEPH BOWSER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 27, 2018 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
with Respect to the North Valley Bancorp Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the Quarter ended March 31, 2009

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of North Valley Bancorp, a California corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The
  Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009
  (the Form 10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
  15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | Information
  contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
  financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                        

|                      |                                                               
|--------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |                                                               
|Dated: May
  12, 2009 | /s/ Michael
  J. Cushman                                      
|                      |                                                               
|                      | Michael J.
  Cushman                                          
|                      | President
  and Chief Executive Officer                       
|                      | (Principal
  Executive Officer)                               
|                      |                                                               
|Dated: May
  12, 2009 | /s/ Kevin R.
  Watson                                         
|                      |                                                               
|                      | Kevin R.
  Watson                                             
|                      | Executive
  Vice President & Chief Financial Officer          
|                      | (Principal
  Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer)

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to North Valley Bancorp and will be retained by North Valley Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

October 22, 2015

Hon. Scott M. Ellison

Law Offices Of Scott M. Ellison

410 Peoples Street

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Hon. Mark Skurka

District Attorney

901 Leopard Street, Room 205

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-15-00391-CR

Tr.Ct.No. 13-CR-2552-B

Style: The State of Texas v. Celestino Vivanco

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: 117th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. Anne Lorentzen, Nueces County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr., Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)