alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of

Videotron Ltd.

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Videotron Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ending
December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Hugues Simard, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 18, 2016



/s/ Hugues SimardName: Hugues Simard Title: Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
I 

' \ 

A. 

I 

I 

• 

I 

'6\<9 

.ft----

L ·-==----------·=- 'k:szez 

1 l @ 

- - - ---·-----------------.. 

'\. 

"., ' 

REF _ IDi: ~"t~~ 6 Qt.Jr'.,. "' ' 

' 

z_, _,.. __ ~ 

- -~ ... ""'--== 

-~ 

' . 

\ 

. J-

• I 

. 

'( 

--~ 

- .J 

) 

O· I 

I 

' • 

I 

I 

r • J 

I 

I I 

• I 

·/ 

, ...... ==.-
l ct 

2. 

3. 

4. 

5. 

eclassifi ed and a ro 

NAME: 

STATUS: 

FUNCTION: 

SECURITY: 

ursuantto E .0. 13 2 

CSP 3300 - Teletypewriter Cryptographic Attachment Mark II. 

In use. 

Encipherment of 

Category A. 

CRYPTOGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES: 

CSP 3300 is a ipher machine to be used 

off-line and semi-on-line fol' th eru>~w;_nj of Ba~ 

u.,.~ The plain text of aud~r~ters is '\ 

stored in 51.fllays - l r i v of the tape. At the 

same time, a f1x941 12 e right end plate of a 

5 rotor maze are energ zed. h current passes through the 

maze and is ref.l.es#@~ b~ to the rieht end plate. The 

energizing of a com na on ~ 3 contacts on the lef~ end 

plate and 7 contacts on the r~ght end plate pl'od~~l'ans- posi tion key which permutes the output of the 5 relays 

according to the elements of the symetric group of degree s. 

'lhe energizing of a combination of 5 contacts on the right end plate produces an additive key, which is combined modulo 

2 with the ouput of the trana~osition step, thus producing 

cipher tex7,. ~ 

'~~~ The steppi~ of the rotors of the maze is ~cept that the center(# 3) rotor steps eao~ time.~ 

(Rotors # 2 and # 4 step ~rs,)._;._ , When eta ? ~d---25 on th~i ~ end 

plate are energized, the~ 1 rotor steps. If the •contact 

on the# 4 rotbr is closed at th9:.~~ time the# rotor Bteps, the#·~ rotor also steps. If the ~~ontact on the # l rotor 

is ,R-lso 4osed at the same time, tlie # 2 rotor steps. And if the·~r·contact on the If 2 rotor is closeS,_at the same time,~ 

thentlthe # 5 rotor also steps. t!iaH1&£"', -,:ne conte.cts e!l Plt_!»e ,.~ 

II- :i1a l!.fti i~ 8 ax a el:asea wH:ess h!l!iJ by l t Sze contact WI 
REF ID:A65418 

r----------, ------------ ---

-~ 

... ~ •. :'" 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 

1 
REF ID:A65418 

6. INDICATOR SYSTElll: 

Plain 18.IlLuage 

. 7. COMPROMISE: 

Transmission of 2 or mo:re messages with 

the same indicator. A short crib is necessary in one of the 

tlio message. The result is that both messages can be read 

but it depends entirely on the ability to extend the crib. 

8. ASSOCIATED DOCU?AENTS: 

None available. 
6• DI LlST AID DDICATOR SISTllh 

indicator•. 

indicator 

REF ID:A65418 

Plain language transaission ot •••sage 

T.he rotors are Ht b7 hand to the ••sage 
/·~: 

REF ID:A65418 
( 

i 

·\ 

,/ 

/ 

/ // t--4:-~· . 

' "\ ,,. 

7~ ~F ID:A65418
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ VINYL VISIONS, LLC, Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.

CRAIG A. OEHME, DBA E.E. PAULEY PLAS TIC EXTRUSION, BENJAMIN OEHME, Defendants

- Appellees

DOES, 2

- 10, INCLUSIVE, Defendant

______________________

2015

- 1273

______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 5 :13

- cv

- 01818

- TJH

DTB, Senior Judge Terry J. Hatter Jr..

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

A LAN S TEVEN Y OCKELSON , Law Office of Alan S. Yockelson, San Diego, CA, argued for plaintiff

- appellant.

A NDREW D ALLMANN , Burch Dallmann LLP, Irvine, CA, argued for defendants

- appellees.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (P ROST , Chief Judge, M OORE and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

October 15, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,027
<SECURITIES>                                   262,256
<RECEIVABLES>                                   90,972
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,351
<INVENTORY>                                     86,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,798
<PP&E>                                          55,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 559,919
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          120,899
<BONDS>                                        107,159
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           175
<OTHER-SE>                                     250,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   559,919
<SALES>                                         68,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                89,491
<CGS>                                           59,259
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   72,597
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,701
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,172
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,755
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,547)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (10,046)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (19,501)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (19,501)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.11)


</TABLE>
GEnx Technical Meeting May 15,2012 Subject: Crosswind

GE: M. Szolwinski, 

### J. Snyder, C. Tudor, A. Dow, P. Hill, D. Immel, D. Hensley FAA: D. Mahail, R. Green, T. Rakowski, D. Cook, C. Queitzsch, 

### J. Gray D. Cook explained this mtg is under Exparte rules. The FAA will only be able to give limited response. M. Szolwinski explained need forexemption on GE and airframerside.

C. Tudor, presented the GE prepared material: Agenda Crosswind envelope Exemption needs to expand to cover aii1B models now. Design offan module assy and OGV design At 30 knots separated flowvibration occurs. GE would like to expand envelope for 1B to 30 knots and 2B for 35 knots. OGV is astructural airfoil. Ifone airfoil has a peeking load the otherOGVs would share that load. The OGVs directly underthe Fwd engine mount are structural while the otherOGVs are onlythere for performance and aero. The 3 underthe mount are titanium, rest are aluminum. D. Mahail asked for an explanation ofthe performance aspects ofthe OGV ring design. Performance and acoustics requirements. Aero design dictatesthe numberofOGVs. OGVs also play a structural role. The AI airfoils are forged. OGVs have aGE proprietary design. They are light weight structural airfoils. The OD aftfillet is the area where material EL are exceeded, however, this is notthe limiting location structurallyforthe OGV. FBO loads size the fan OGV.GE has neverseen any distress on anyOGV following a F80test on the GEnx-18 orGEnx-28 programs. GE has no intentto redesign the OGVs. Exemption has to cover what the exemption says. Ifan OGV design was required then other regulations must also be addressed. R. Green recommended this discussion be continued off linefrom this meeting.

End of Meeting
<PAGE>   1
   
                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

The Board of Directors
NWE Capital (Cyprus) Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no. 333-5398) on Form
S-4 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated March 3, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of NWE Capital (Cyprus) Ltd. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 1997 and 1996, and the related consolidated statements of 
operations, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 1997, which report appears in the Annual 
Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31, 1997 of
PLD Telekom Inc.



                                      KPMG

St. Petersburg, Russia
July 22, 1998
# Sign-in Sheet- Press
U.S. EPA Public Hearing on
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO AIR TOXICS STANDARDS AND NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR PORTLAND CEMENT MANUFACTURING 

### [August 1 6, 201 2] • [Arlington, Texas]

Name Affili a tion

# ~~J

# 7**L~t--'>**

# ~ 

# J'U.N-"'**~** 

# tJ fAA< 

# !f r

c_/ht- D**~:: ~/** **777&** 

# !)CY?t olJ X

# ~l**rl** £) 

## -H-L t-p...-**~~** 

## (/ (/

P l ease Prin t or Wri t e Le g ibl y E-mail and Telephon e Number

# <J{ult.'s~**~ ~v-......_** **~1y q7** **t7** 

### fo:!t ..J/ J r/2tc. #

## 1-~~#?s~

P ag e N o. 1
Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ENACTED UNDER
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Domenic N. Golato, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION] 1350, as
enacted under [SECTION] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company as of September 30, 2003 (the end of the period covered by the
Report).

Date:  May 14, 2004

                                       /s/ Domenic N. Golato
                                       ------------------------------------
                                       Domenic N. Golato
                                       Chief Financial Officer


<PAGE>
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

SAN JUAN HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-10003

D.C. No. 4:07-cr-01581-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, Chief Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

San Juan Hernandez appeals from the district court’s order denying his 

motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand. 

Hernandez contends that the district court failed to explain adequately its 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 16-10003 

denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under Amendment 782 to the 

Sentencing Guidelines. We agree. The district court’s order does not address or 

explain its rejection of the arguments presented in either Hernandez’s motion for a 

sentence reduction or probation’s recommendation that the district court grant a 

sentence reduction. Accordingly, we vacate and remand. See United States v. 

Trujillo, 713 F.3d 1003, 1009-10 (9th Cir. 2013) (district court must provide some 

explanation for rejecting a defendant’s non-frivolous arguments). 

VACATED and REMANDED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.5
                                                                    ------------

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Lawrence E. Kreider and Glenn P. Dickes or any of them, each acting alone, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for
him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with
the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (the "Form 10-K") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of
the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 8th
day of March,1999.


                                       /s/ EDWARD J. LANDAU
                                       ------------------------------
                                           EDWARD J. LANDAU
**Exhibit 32.2**

**The following certification accompanies the issuer’s quarterly Report on Form 10and is not filed as provided in SEC Release Nos. 33-8212, 34-47551 and IC-25967, dated March 21, 2003**

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 9067 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Summit Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kikuo Nakahara, CFO of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | 1.     | To the best of my knowledge, the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                          |
|   | 2.     | To the best of my knowledge, the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and operating results of the Company. |

 

|   | /s/ KIKUO NAKAHARA                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                                            |
|   | **Kikuo Nakahara Chief Financial Officer** |

This certification accompanies this Reportpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
exv10w7






EXHIBIT 10.7




Summary of Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Cash Bonus Arrangement



The following is a summary of the terms of the cash bonus arrangement between Mindspeed
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) and Gerald J. Hamilton, Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales.
Mr. Hamilton is eligible to receive a cash bonus based on his level of achievement of his weighted
goals previously established by the Compensation and Management Development Committee of the
Company’s Board of Directors (the “Compensation Committee”), which may include fiscal year revenue,
design win execution, budget reduction or other goals.



The Compensation Committee approves the amount of the cash bonus for Mr. Hamilton on a semi-annual
basis. If Mr. Hamilton achieves 100% of his overall goals in a given fiscal year, he is eligible to
receive a cash bonus in an amount equal to 55% of his base salary for such fiscal year. The
Compensation Committee may award Mr. Hamilton a cash bonus in excess of such amount in the event
that he achieves greater than 100% of his overall goals. The cash bonus arrangement between the
Company and Mr. Hamilton does not have a maximum amount or cap.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       4,081,733
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  328,599
<ALLOWANCES>                                    14,020
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,897,456
<PP&E>                                         671,796
<DEPRECIATION>                                 270,418
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,293,340
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,172,247
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,484
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,986,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,076,093
<SALES>                                        616,168
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               876,079
<CGS>                                          244,141
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  244,141
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,917,131
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             573,043
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,520,229)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,520,229)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,520,229)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.56)
        

</TABLE>
#### Baker, Plaintiff in error, vs. The State, Defendant in error.

*March 21*

*April 11, 1893.*

*Criminal law and practice: Supreme court: Appointment of counsel: Bill of exceptions: Suspension of rules of circuit court.*

1, This court will not appoint counsel to defend, at the public expense, persons charged with crime.

8. The rules of the circuit court in respect to the preparation and settlement of a bill of exceptions cannot be suspended by this court in a particular case.

EEEOE to the Circuit Court for *Ashland*County.

The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

*Rxiblee A.*Cole, for the plaintiff in error.

The *Attorney*General, for the defendant in error.

Lyof, C. <1.

Three motions are submitted in behalf of plaintiff in error. They are: (1) That this court appoint counsel for him at the public expense; (2) that Eule XXIV of the circuit court be waived and that, court authorized to sign the notes of the court reporter (with exhibits attached) *585as the bill of exceptions; and (3) that the record be remitted to tlie-circuit court to the end that the bill of exceptions, when settled, be attached thereto and returned to this court.

1. After the decisions of this court in *State v. Williamson,*72 Wis. 61; *State v. Wentler, 16*Wis. 89, 97; and *McDonald v. State,*80 Wis. 407, denying similar motions, it is idle to move here for the appointment of counsel to defend, at the public expense, persons charged with crime. The first motion is denied.

2. We have no power to suspend, in a particular case, the rules Of the circuit court in respect to the preparation and settlement of a bill of exceptions. Such rules have the force of statute until abrogated by competent authority. The second motion is denied also.

3. The third motion is granted. The clerk will remit the record to the circuit court, for the purpose indicated in the motion.

*By the*Oourt.— Ordered accordingly.