alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.2








Certification
of Principal Accounting Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




I, Paul
Sledz, certify that:




1.           I
have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2007
of Comtex News Network, Inc.;




2.           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.           The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial
reporting.









February
      12, 2008
            /s/ Paul SledzPaul
      SledzTreasurer
      & ControllerPrincipal
      Accounting Officer
Due	to	the	large	size	of	the	manual	PDF	files	and	a	maximum	of	

10	megabyte	upload	limit	for	filing	a	petition,	the	documents	are	therefore	

available	online.	

Any	other	information	regarding	the	DJI	Phantom	3	Professional	along	with	

manuals	can	be	obtained	from	the	link	below.

http://download.djiinnovations.com/downloads/phantom_3/en/Phantom_3_Professional_Use

r_Manual_v1.2_en.pdf

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-3/download
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 9, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60689 Summary Calendar

MANUEL ANGUIANO-ARTEAGA, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA No. A41 631 765)

-------------------- Before SMITH, WIENER, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Petitioner Manuel Anguiano-Arteaga (Anguiano) appeals (1) the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) reversal of the immigration judge’s grant of a waiver of inadmissibility and (2) the BIA’s final order of removal based on Anguiano’s commission of an aggravated felony . Anguiano argues that his crime of indecency with a child by exposure was not an aggravated felony. The respondent argues that we lack jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(C).2

We have held that, under § 1252(a)(2)(C), jurisdiction will be precluded when the alien is removable for committing an aggravated felony. S ee Nehme v. INS , 252 F.3d 415, 420 (5th Cir. 2001). Anguiano’s conviction under TEX . PENAL CODE ANN . § 21.11(a)(2) is an aggravated felony. S ee United States v. Zavala-Sustaita , 214 F.3d 601, 607 (5th Cir. 2000). Consequently, we lack jurisdiction to consider his petition. S ee § 1252(a)(2)(C); Nehme , 252 F.3d at 420. In addition, we lack j uri sdiction over the BIA’s “discretionary exercise of its power to review and reverse the IJ’s grant of, rather than eligibility for, section 212(c) relief.” S ee Delgado-Reynua v. Gonzales , 450 F.3d 596, 600 (5th Cir. 2006)percent. We therefore dismiss this portion of Anguiano’s petition for review. Anguiano also argues that the BIA should have remanded the matter to the immigration judge rather than ordering him removed. The BIA did not exceed the scope of its authority in so doing. See Delgado-Reynua , 450 F.3d at 600-601. This portion of Anguiano’s petition for review is therefore denied.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED IN PART FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION; DENIED IN PART.
M14004 – Chemical 2

CAS Name



## CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2248 

To increase the penalties for making personal information about a Federal 

law enforcement officer or other Federal officer available to the public. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. HAWLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To increase the penalties for making personal information 

about a Federal law enforcement officer or other Federal 

officer available to the public. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROTECTING FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT 

4 OFFICERS FROM DOXING. 

5 Section 119(a) of title 18, United States Code, is 

6 amended, in the undesignated matter following paragraph 

7 (2), by striking ‘‘5 years’’ and inserting ‘‘10 years’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
### ~ .i=';~r.c



## ~ =::!!gmj"ImlZll=~~-..",-"";,;:rr_':,,r_! ~

_ --- "Q:

%*,••.... 4 i
. ) .~. 4._ 

# TOWN OF SILVERCITY BOXII88,SlLVERCITY,NE~~IC!>"~Z.(515(53~J~b"fAX(515)5J4.6111 

## 2 

# a_-ilii•••• ----

October 10,2014 U.S. Department ofTransportation, Office of Aviation Analysis EAS & Domestic Analysis Division Attn: Scott Faulk 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 Viaemail: sco/l.[aulk@dot.gov Re: Essential Air Service for Silver City, New Mexico Area Dear Mr. Faulk: On behalf ofthe Town of Silver City, 1would like to express our appreciation of the extension oftime forproposals and comments onthe proposals forEssential Air Service forthe Silver City area. The Town of Silver City has had an opportunity to review the proposals submitted along with receiving presentations and clarification from the airlines that made those proposals. With this information added to our due diligence and public input, we recommend that Boutique Airbe awarded the Essential Air Service contract for the Silver City area. With our recommendation, we waive our right to have atwin engine plane. We appreciate your attention to this matter. Sincerely,

Michael S. Morones Mayor
Exhibit 15

Fleming Companies, Inc.
1945 Lakepointe Drive, Box 299013
Lewisville, Texas 75029

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Fleming Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the 16-week periods
ended April 21, 2001 and April 15, 2000, as indicated in our report dated May
18, 2001; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 16 weeks ended April 21, 2001, is
incorporated by reference in the following:

(i)    Registration Statement No. 2-98602 (1985 Stock Option Plan) on Form S-8;

(ii)   Registration Statement No. 33-36586 (1990 Fleming Stock Option Plan) on
       Form S-8;

(iii)  Registration Statement No. 33-56241 (Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
       Purchase Plan) on Form S-3;

(iv)   Registration Statement No. 333-11317 (1996 Stock Incentive Plan) on Form
       S-8;

(v)    Registration Statement No. 333-35703 (Senior Subordinated Notes) on Form
       S-4;

(vi)   Registration Statement No. 333-28219 (Associate Stock Purchase Plan) on
       Form S-8;

(vii)  Registration Statement No. 333-80445 (1999 Stock Incentive Plan) on Form
       S-8;

(viii) Registration Statement No. 333-89375 (Consolidated Savings Plus and Stock
       Ownership Plan) on Form S-8;

(ix)   Registration Statement No. 333-40660 (Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
       Purchase Plan) on Form S-3; and

(x)    Registration Statement No. 333-40670 (2000 Stock Incentive Plan) on Form
       S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of a registration statement
prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
May 24, 2001
02/07/2011 10:58 FAX 2024935142 

JrilN-<it.-2011 14:30 From:UKC509S13 

FAA 

2149695100 

^ OMS 

To:2024935142 

gl002/002 

P.£•' 2 

JOTvTFS DAY 

271 7 NORT^i HflSWOOD STREET > PftI I Mt . 1 fc?<.A.5 7a?0 1 tSl S 

rtLE^MONE : 2l<l,a20.3»3 » • PAC5IM1UE 21-4 T.fiff S11.1<J1 

DIrfta Number: (214) S69-5021 

«psingef@ionesday.com 

JP()04207 

808817-600003 

VIA rACSlMFLE 

January 25, 2011 

H(in, Richard C. Goodwin, Administraxivc Law Judge 

Ol'Gct of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Depariment of Transporiaiion 

1200 New Jci^ey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC. 20590 

Fax No, 202-366-7536 

FcdtTuI Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Bldg,, Suite 2W1000 

WiLshini;ton. DC 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket CIcik, AGC-430 

Fax No. 202-493-5142 

CO 

-. 

_J 

pen 

u J 

,'•'; :-I>t ' 

'.-iCTO^-J) 

, _ , OC--4 

-'VO^ I 

„:2-J3n-l 

3S« 

GO 

Ue: rA/\ Docket No. CPI0SW0006. In the Maner of American Airlines. Inc. 

Dear Judge Goodwin; 

This letter is to inlbrm the Court thai I have a vacation scheduled from May 9 to N/fay 1 i). 

20H during which time I will be out ofti)c country. I would rcspectfially request that the Court 

not set Ih6 hearing in this matter during that time period. 1 have conferred with coun.sel to the 

Complainant and she docs nut <,)ppose this request, 

1 am availnble TO answer the Court's questions, if any. at your convenience. Tharik you 

very much. 

Sincerely yours, 

Evan P. Sinycr 

Enclosures 

cc; Yolanda A. Remal (bv facsimiled 

Francis Heil, Fsq. (bv email) 

I>l.,l-634W09vl 

*TLANI/ \ » UhlJINC - aRIISArj p . CnlCAQO • CL6VCt-»NP • eoLUMBU i - DA I •.*;; « DUBA I • PftAMKfUflr • HONCKONrt • KOUBTON 

inVINE • LONDON • LOiv AN«ELES > MADfllO • MEXICO CITr • Mil I N • MOSCOW • MUNICN • NEW DFI HI • Ne*rOO « . PAAIE 

KiJiUdUPCM • SAN nrreti . SAN fHANCiaco • SMAMOHAI • sii.ir.ijN'.AucEv • s>»fc*»oi»(» • arpNEV - r«i>-iir • TDI^TO • WAJHINOTQN
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>  5
<CIK>  0000352956
<NAME>  FAFCO, INC.
       
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            856,700
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,298,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                      595,200
<INVENTORY>                                       728,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3,875,800
<PP&E>                                          2,542,100
<DEPRECIATION>                                  2,165,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  4,865,500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           1,963,000
<BONDS>                                           991,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                          412,200
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,498,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,865,500
<SALES>                                         6,187,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                6,302,500
<CGS>                                           3,416,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   3,416,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   19,800
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 80,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   870,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                       54,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               816,700
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      816,700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         .20
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00321

- CV

Vets Securing America, Inc. v. Edward Smith

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2 of Nueces County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2020CCV

- 60872

- 2

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appellant.
We further order this decision certified below for observan ce. January 13, 2022
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

MikX MONES, Appellant, VS. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Res ondent. No. 85113 

## r! ri ;11' ITIMS ScP 19 2C22
: ::T;4 P.90“'N Clf_tc:4; (tr. C4:31::%7

Y t ORDERDISMISSINGAPPEAL

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (r), 1...17.1 This is an appeal from an order denying a pretrial petition for

a writ of habeas corpus. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Jacqueline M. Bluth, Judge.

Because noappealliesfrom anorder denyingapretrialpetition for a writ ofhabeas corpus, this court entered an order directing appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Kussrnan v. District Court, 96 Nev. 544, 545-46, 612 P.2d 679, 680 (1980) (explaining that legislative amendments eliminated the right to appealfrom an order denyinga pretrialhabeaspetition). Appellant has responded and first argues that this court should overturn its precedents and conclude that an appeal on a pretrial petition for a writ of habeas corpus is a final appealable judgment. This court declines this invitation. In the alternative, appellant asks this court to construe the appeal as an original petition for a writ of habeas corpus to this court directly. The request is denied. Appellant can seek this court's review

0 1,2. -A9.314Stiglich J.

through a mandamus proceeding. provided he meets the requirements for mandamusrelief. See id. This court lacksjurisdiction over this appeal and therefore ORDERSthis appeal DISMISSED.

G , J. Hardesty

Herndon

cc: Hon. Jacqueline M. Bluth, District Judge Isso & Associates Law Firm, PLLC Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA k! 1,17.A 2
In l'l!l'lr reter to Initials 

~dNo. 

OP-20-GY 

S:&QRE'P 

SECRET 

REF ID:A72632. 

NAVY DEPARTMENT 

OFF.CCE OF CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS 

WASHINGTON 

16 August 193'1. 

:rm.mR.A.NDUM FOR 20.A.: 

l. I have just learned through Mr. Friedman, head of ~my 

Intelligence Seot1on, that the Coast Guard Intelligence Division 

ha.a been equipped with I.B.'M. Tabulating Equipment for Cryptanalytical. purposes. · · · 

2. The idea of applying this machinery to cryptanalysis originated in the Communication Security Group of the Navy and 

was revealed in confidence to Fried.man. The latter obviousl.y passed it on to his wife who is head of the Coast Guard Crypt- ana.lytioal Unit. 

3. The application of Tabulating Machinery, and irL faot 

any machinery, to oryptanalysis represents the greatest advance 

we have made in thl.s f'ield in reoent years. It is in my opinion 

an important weapon of national defense which if revea.lE1d to 

foreign nations might deprive us of a great advantage ill time 

of war. 

4. In view of the extensive publ.icity giv~n to tho Coast 

Guard oryptanalytical aoti vi ties I believe that illUnediaJ:;e steps should be taken to inform responsible authorities of' bo·:;h the 

Army and Coast Guard that the Navy considers information per- taining to the appl.ication of machinery to cryptanalysi.:i is a 

matter of national defense and should be withheld from •iisolosure 

under provisions of the Espionage Act of 15 June 191'1. It might 

also be well to take similar action with respect to the International Business Machine Company through their representative 

here in Washington. 

5. I have takon it upon myself to present the :foregoing views ·to Friedman this morning and request that prompt action 

be taken to give this action official backing. 

l.~ic. 7 S'-pi-. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-18-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352\3
-·"' - - ~ + ..... 

Classifier: Jira ~ 

Typist: Jira --

, .. , 

CRQSS REFERENCE NU~BERS: 

'. 

Date of_ Com.roc.mication: ,J 4'm 48 . __ 

, -Date o-f ·Basic Document: 

. -.. 

'· l .. 

. __ :~ . . Routed to: ftle 

Date of..Cl~ssifying: 9 .Tim 48 -fl -·.aiL-

.. ~ -' ... 

•. -, .... ::"' - ... I ., j 

-~ .. ,/ ... ~... . ~ _.,,. : 

~ ... ... -·. ,.. \f' 

• ";t"• - .. 

' . . 

" ... =- .. · .. , r c 

. ··i .. ;. .....
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joel F. Gemunder, President and Chief Executive
Officer of Omnicare, Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
 the period ended September 30, 2007 (the Periodic Report) fully complies
 with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
 Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | 2. | The information contained in the Periodic Report
 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
 results of operations of the Company.                                                                                         

Date: October 31, 2007

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ Joel F. Gemunder                 
| |                                      
| | Joel F. Gemunder                     
| | President and Chief Executive Officer

E-5

---
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2299 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 219
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2299

To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive Payment Program 
                    of the State maritime academies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2021

 Mr. Peters (for himself, Mr. Young, Mr. Cruz, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Braun, 
Mr. Markey, and Ms. Klobuchar) introduced the following bill; which was 
  read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

                           December 17, 2021

              Reported by Ms. Cantwell, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive Payment Program 
                    of the State maritime academies.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Changing Age-Determined Eligibility 
To Student Incentive Payments Act'' or the ``CADETS Act''.

SEC. 2. AGE REQUIREMENT FOR THE STUDENT INCENTIVE PAYMENT PROGRAM OF 
              THE STATE MARITIME ACADEMIES.

    Section 51509 of title 46, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(i) Age Requirement.--The Secretary may make an agreement under 
this section only with a qualified student who will meet the age 
requirement for enlistment in the Navy Reserve at the time of 
graduation from the academy.''.
                                                       Calendar No. 219

117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 2299

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To modify the age requirement for the Student Incentive Payment Program 
                    of the State maritime academies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 17, 2021

                       Reported without amendment
```
COif.P'ftl!ff'!flcf; 

NSA. CIRCULAR 

NUMBER 92-1 (Change 1) 

11ATIONAL SEXnJRI'.l'I AGl!JroY 

Wo.ahington 25, D. c., 31May1955 

CANCELLED WIIEN CB.ANGE HAS BEEN nrrmED m BA.SIC CIRCULAR 

POLICY GOVERNIHG PROCUREMENT ,AND STOCKING 

OF SPARE PARTS FOR CRYPI'OLOGIC AND REI.A.TED 

~UIH.fEN"t R~UIRED BY DEPARTMEl~fS AND AGENCIES 

OF THE Ulf.ITED STATES GOVEHlJMENT 

The following pen-and-ink change wi,11 be entered in the basic. 

Circular: 

On page 3 ot the be.sic Circular, change "NSA CIRCULAR RO. 90-2" 

to read "IfSA CIRCULAR BO. 92-1." 

OFFICIAL: 

l5>n !Jl~:a,J~ D. M. Zit~~-. 

MaJor WAC 

Actg. Asst. AG 

DISTRIBUTION V 

JOHN B ACICERMAN 

Ma.Jor General, US Air Force 

Chiet ot Statt 

€6NFIDENTIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-14-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3