alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
June 17, 2012 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Department of Pesticide Regulation
 

Brian R. Leahy 

Director 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

Governor 

TO:	 Interested Parties 

SUBJECT:	 ANNUAL VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS INVENTORY 

REPORT: EMISSIONS FOR 1990-2010
 

The Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) originally published this report in March 2012. 

Since the report’s release, DPR found an error in the pesticide use report data and volatile
 

organic compound (VOC) emissions for a single product containing bifenthrin. This revised 

report corrects that error.
 

As required under Title 3, California Code of Regulations (3 CCR), section 6452.4, DPR has completed 

the annual VOC emissions inventory report that includes the following information: 

•	 total agricultural and structural pesticide VOC emissions for the previous years 

•	 evaluation of compliance with benchmarks specified in 3 CCR section 6452.2 

•	 fumigant emission limits for the upcoming year if necessary, according to 3 CCR section 6452.2 

•	 an emission rating (or application method adjustment factor, the percentage of fumigant
 

applied emitted to air) for each fumigation method
 

This report contains information based on 1990–2010 pesticide use data for five ozone
 

nonattainment areas (NAAs) in California. The pesticide VOC emissions are compared to the
 

goals described in the ozone state implementation plan (SIP). These “SIP goals” are a 20 percent
 

reduction from 1990 for the Sacramento Metro, Southeast Desert, and South Coast NAAs; a
 

12 percent reduction from 1990 for the San Joaquin Valley NAA; and a phase-in of the 

reductions for the Ventura NAA, with a final reduction for Ventura of 20 percent from 1990 

by 2012. These goals are the same as the VOC regulation benchmarks specified in 3 CCR
 

section 6452.2. 

The 2009 pesticide VOC emissions for all five NAAs complied with the SIP goals and VOC
 

regulation benchmarks, ranging from 24 to 84 percent less than emissions in the 1990 base year. 

Relative to 2009, pesticide VOC emissions in 2010 increased by 7 to 60 percent, depending on 

the NAA.
 

Consistent with the regulations, DPR has established a fumigant limit for the Ventura NAA. 

Based on the emission data for 2010, the fumigant limit for May 1–October 31, 2012 is 942,000 

pounds (2.56 average tons/day) of emissions. As specified by 3 CCR section 6452.3, the Ventura
 

county agricultural commissioner has several options to enforce the fumigant limit.
 

1001 I Street • P.O. Box 4015 • Sacramento, California 95812-4015 • www.cdpr.ca.gov 

A Department of the California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on recycled paper, 100% post-consumer--processed chlorine-free. 
 

 

 

Interested Parties 

June 17, 2012 

Page 2 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Randy Segawa, Environmental 

Program Manager, at 916-324-4137. 

Sincerely, 

Original signed by 

Charles M. Andrews 

Associate Director 

916-445-3984 

cc: Mr. Randy Segawa, DPR
J-S50005-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

v.

GREGORY B. BARTUCCI

Appellant No. 1686 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence July 8, 2015

in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County Criminal Division

at No(s): CP-36-CR-0001286-2014

BEFORE: MUNDY, STABILE, and FITZGERALD,*JJ.

JUDGMENT ORDER BY FITZGERALD, J.: FILED NOVEMBER 18, 2016

Appellant filed a pro se “Motion-Application for: (A) leave to proceed 

pro se on direct appeal; (B) dismissal of assigned counsel; (C) to strike any 

prospective merits brief submitted by [counsel]; (D) leave to file 1925(a)[1]

statement nunc pro tunc and; (E) leave to file extended length brief.” We 

remand this case for a hearing pursuant to Commonwealth v. Grazier, 

713 A.2d 81 (Pa. 1998).2

 

*

Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.

1 Appellant referenced Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a), when he intended Rule 1925(b). 

See Defendant-Appellant’s Motion, 10/13/16, at 7. 

2

Pursuant to Grazier, “when an appellant requests pro se status after his 

counsel has filed an appellate brief, the request is untimely.” Id. at 82 

(citation omitted). On September 23, 2016, counsel filed an advocate’s 

brief. On October 13, 2016, the instant motion was received by this Court. 
J-S50005-16

- 2 -

A criminal appellant has a constitutional right to counsel on direct 

appeal. Commonwealth v. Wrecks, 931 A.2d 717, 722 (Pa. Super. 2007). 

“When a waiver of the right to counsel is sought at . . . the appellate stages, 

an on-the-record determination should be made that the waiver is a 

knowing, intelligent, and voluntary one.” Grazier, 713 A.2d at 82. Thus, 

we remand this case for proceedings consistent with the foregoing. 

The trial court is to conduct a Grazier hearing within thirty days. We 

direct the Prothonotary to enter a new briefing schedule based upon the 

outcome of the Grazier hearing.

Case remanded. Jurisdiction retained. 

Judge Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this 

case.

 

However, the verification is dated August 20, 2016. In an abundance of 

caution, based upon the prisoner mailbox rule, we will consider the motion 

timely. See Commonwealth v. Chambers, 35 A.3d 34, 38 (Pa. Super. 

2011 (holding “a pro se prisoner’s document is deemed filed on the date he 

delivers it to prison authorities for mailing”) (citation omitted)).
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Videotron Ltd.



|                               |  |                                              
|------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name of Subsidiary             |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation
or Organization
|9227-2590 Québec inc.          |  | Québec                                       
|9230-7677 Québec inc.          |  | Québec                                       
|9293-6707 Québec inc.          |  | Québec                                       
|8487782 Canada inc.            |  | Canada                                       
|8513872 Canada inc.            |  | Canada                                       
|Videotron G.P.                 |  | Québec                                       
|Videotron Infrastructures inc. |  | Canada                                       
|Videotron L.P.                 |  | Québec                                       
|Videotron US Inc.              |  | Delaware                                     
|SETTE inc.                     |  | Québec
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

893 

KA 15-00094 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIAN L. SMITH, ALSO KNOWN AS BRIAN LEE SMITH,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.)

 

MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Eric

R. Adams, A.J.), rendered June 25, 2014. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of aggravated family offense. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same memorandum as in People v Smith ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___

[Nov. 10, 2016]).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>                                  5
<CIK>                                      0000351541                        
<NAME>                                     BCT INTERNATIONAL, INC.      
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,071
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,794
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,320
<INVENTORY>                                      2,440
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,137
<PP&E>                                           1,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,116
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,610
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,960
<BONDS>                                            490
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         60
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,814
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,610
<SALES>                                          7,543
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,487
<CGS>                                            5,639
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,747
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,980
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   125
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  28
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,607
<INCOME-TAX>                                       380
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,227
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21
        

</TABLE>
:=-. -

. -.. 

REF ID : A414 B '9JilrCE CH.,,.,,. OF STAFit 

........ 1,,, •h ...... t?.'1'" 

-·-i 

.) ~ 

- GEORGE FABYAN 

CHICAGO 

~'113(-S-~~ ~ 

v7 

VvAi- Ut.>1.·. 

PO.BOX 435 

' I r'o;( I 1.'IENT 

August 18 ,1919 •. 

Dear Major <Crockett: 

Now oomes the Post Mortem on the conference. 

I was grateful that you were present as General Churchill's representative and that you had the opportunity of forming your own 

impression. And if consistent, I will ask you to forward this 

letter to General Churchill with such endorsement as you deem 

proper. 

Riverbank is unable to arrive at any oonclusion why Colonel Mauborgne at first refused to admit that we 

had broken the Cipher as used at the time we so reported. He 

finally, begrudgingly, admitted that we had broken the Cipher 

the way we thought it was used or the way Mr. Gherardi had used 

it and he asked ir we claimed we oould break the Cipher in all 

the different ways that the ms.chine might be used. He knew that 

we had made no suoh olaim. 

It was evident, in Colonel Mauborgne 1 s opinion, that we made a mistake in going over his head. He stated that 

Yardley had reported to him that we had broken the Cipher and he 

seemed anxious to show that we had not done so and especially 

anxious to show that we did not know how the machine was used 

and this, in .spite of the fact that Friedman, Burdick and Po~ell 

had all seen the machine in use as late as last April. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a a ..... 
•• 

./ 

REF ID:A41488lif ....,., 

· The directions for the use of a machine of this character 

are well thought out, typwritten and mimeographed. The rough· 

pencil sketch as to the way they proposed to use the machine is 

not well thought out as evidenced by answers to questions as to 

wh~ther they were going to use the punctuation, etc. Colonel 

Mauborgne stated that the Cipher systems were"subject to change 

like the styles of women's hats" and we agree with him. 

Colonel Mauborgne stated that neither he nor the M, I. 8 

had ever attempted to decipher the work of the A. T. & T. Machine 

and yet, they have placed themsel~es on reoord that it was indecipherable. 

Riverbanfc was invited to work out some puzzles in the shape 

of Cipher messages made by using modifications and changes in the 

old eystem and if we succeeded, I presume there are a thousand other 

"little refinements' and changes.which could be made by an individual 

but which would not be practical in actual use. 

You doubtless remember the position Mauborgne took on his 

DeYaub Cipher which he is anxious to have the Army adopt when 

Friedman, Yardley,Burdick all told him that if used as he stated, 

it would have to yield to the attack. 

Frankly, our people asked " What's the use"? There appeared 

to be other things at stake besides the vulnerability of the Cipher. 

These will probably be evidenced by Colonel Mauborgne's report by 

the Chief of the Signal Corps. 

Sincerely yo~:~,,,?', 

~~~
'( 

### SERVED: JANUARY 24, 2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

In The Matter Of: FACILITY SOLUTIONS, INC. Respondent 

### WASHINGTON, DC ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2013-0047 Case No. 2012NE700128

ORDERCONTINUING PRE-HEARING STATUS CONFERENCE OnJune 6, 2013, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed. Among otherthings, this Order set oral argument on dispositive motions or, ifno dispositive motions were filed, a Pre-Hearing Status Conference for January 23,2014, at 1:30 p.m. Easterntime. OnJanuary 23, 2014, the parties convened by telephone for a Pre-Hearing Status Conference. The parties statedthat they are engaged in settlement discussions that will likely conclude onFebruary 20, 2014, and would be betterpositioned to discuss pre-hearing issues after that date. Having reviewedthe case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; It

### Is Hereby Ordered: 1. Pursuantto 14 C.P.R.§ 13.205(a)(l), the Pre-Hearing Status Conference is continued to allow for further settlement discussions. 2. The parties shall reconvene for the Pre-Hearing Status Conference on

### Wednesday, February 26,2014, at 1:30 p.m. Eastern time. 4. Pursuantto 14 C.P.R. § 13.215, should the parties reach a settlement, notice ofthe settlement and a withdrawal ofthe pleadings shall be filed withthe Judge.

Attachment: Service List/ I ·' 'J •

SERVICE LIST- BYU.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Mr. Brian K. Khan 

### Complainant's Counsel Office ofthe Regional Counsel Federal Aviation Administration 2300 East Devori Avenue, AGL-7H Des Plaines,1IL 60018 TEL: 847-294-7652 FAX: 847-294-7498 Mr. Roy J. Transit 

### Respondent's Counsel P.O. Box 1578 Royal Oak, MI 48068-1578 TEL: 586-491-6822 Judge J.E. Sullivan 

### US. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation ONE COPY

1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0047 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000352715
<NAME> BIOSONICS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,000
<INVENTORY>                                     53,889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               149,143
<PP&E>                                         197,759
<DEPRECIATION>                               (166,175)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 180,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,709,093
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,800
<OTHER-SE>                                (15,633,449)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   180,827
<SALES>                                          3,575
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,658
<CGS>                                              366
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               158,731
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,781
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (152,439)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (152,439)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (152,439)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         (32860)
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   201978
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       6635
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                175752
<PP&E>                                         1083288
<DEPRECIATION>                                (104375)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1154666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           207078
<BONDS>                                         552798
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      16750
<COMMON>                                        296403
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1154666
<SALES>                                         196294
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                196294
<CGS>                                          (65639)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  (65639)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                171629
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               (80309)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (6149)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (6149)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (6149)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    0.000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.000
        

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION





The
      undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Air T, Inc. (the
      "Company") that, to the best of his knowledge, the Quarterly Report of the
      Company on Form 10-Q for the six months ended September 30, 2006 fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
      period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.





























Date:
      November 3, 2006  /s/
      Walter Clark


Walter
      Clark, Chief Executive Officer











Date:
      November 3, 2006   /s/
      John J. Gioffre


John
      J.
      Gioffre, Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 17, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 17, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A16I0266. BRG COLLECTIONS, LLC v. KOZY CONSTRUCTION, INC. A/K/A KOZY 

CONSTRUCTION, LLC.

Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2013CV237674
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information from the annual report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,315,950
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,084,500
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    739,366
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      16,363,330
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        16,788,418
<LOANS>                                     84,391,398
<ALLOWANCE>                                    106,360
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             107,795,956
<DEPOSITS>                                  77,372,969
<SHORT-TERM>                                 1,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            706,610
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,476
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,716,377
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             107,795,956
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              5,943,627
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,241,743
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               452,155
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,637,525
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           3,771,889
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,771,889
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,865,636
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   12,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,785,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,296,889
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,296,889
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,610,739
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .80
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.83
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                   572,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                94,360
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              106,360
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           106,360
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         10,000
        


</TABLE>