alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
• REF ID:A67324 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE • 

ASSISTANT SECRETARY 

DAS 

November 20, 1943 

llfiEMORANDUM 

The recommendations of the special committee to investigate security of State Department communications as set 

forth in their report of June 29, 1941 and embodied in 

paragraph 7 of that report have been acted on in the Department of State as follows: 

(a) The classification of messages, RESTRICTED, CONF'IDENTIAL and SECRET has been adopted {Departmental 

Order No. 992, October 29, 1941). 

{b) The redistribution of cryptographic systems has been 

effected in so far as possible. 

(c) Electrically operated cipher machines have been 

obtained and are now in use in ten important 

missions. Presently machines are being obtained for 

five more missions. 

{d} Effort has been made to furnish suitable combination 

safes for the storage of cryptographic paraphernalia, 

e:tc. Instructions have been issued as to the more 

frequent changing of combinations to safes. The 

practice which prevailed of advising the Department 

by card of the combination of safes of offices has 

been discontinued. 

(e) Departmental Order No. 992, October 29, 1941, put 

into effect the recommendation that classification 

of messages should be indicated by the drafting 

of'fi cer. 

(f) While no definitive regulations were drawn up governing the preparation, handling of, distribution, 

filing and the ultimate disposition of plain languaee 

versions of cryptographic messa~es for the guidance 

of all divisions within the Department and embassies, 

legations and consulates in the Field, nevertheless, 

various steps have been taken in the Department and 

in the :B'iel.d along those lines and to create a more 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-09-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 
DAS:mm 

REF ID : A67 }ii4 

-

-2-

security and secret mindedness ln tbe pt~rsonnel of' 

the Department and correspondingly in the 1''ield. 

To some extent these regulations have been enforced. 

This recommendation has not been carried out as con- ce~n~ caree~ orficers. However, a very large percentage of the clerical personnel who are appointed by the Department do receive limited training in 

cryptographic w~rk 1n the Department. 

No stated measures have been taken to provide an inspection service .for cryptographic operations in 

.foreign countries. However, the Chie.f o.f the Division of Communications and Records'was ordered to 

and did make an inspection of eleven offices in South 

America in November and December 1941. In most 

embassies and legations a Foreign Service officer 

has been designated as Security Officer and is 

charged with the responsibility of the enforcement 

of the rules and regulations.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David D. Wesselink, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ David D. WesselinkDavid D. WesselinkChairman and
Chief Executive OfficerMarch 11, 2005
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Dov K. Avni v. Dosohs I, Ltd.

Appellate case number: 01-15-00459-CV

Trial court case number: 2012-07323

Trial court: 157th District Court of Harris County

The Court has determined a relevant document is missing from the clerk’s record. 

Dosoh’s Second Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion for Summary Judgment is not included 

in the clerk’s record.

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record 

containing Dosoh’s Second Traditional and “No Evidence” Motion for Summary Judgment, filed 

on or about August 14, 2014. The supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed in this Court within 

10 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _/s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 7, 2016
*Wednesday, June 23, 1999*

MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

99-855.

#### State ex rel. Sykes v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-307. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal and cross-appeal from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County. Upon consideration of the joint application for dismissal of the appeal and cross-appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
Administrative Offices Civil and Family Division Criminal Division Jury Office 

 (512) 854-9457 (512) 854-9457 (512) 854-9420 (512) 854-9669 

 fax: 854-4744 fax: 854-9549 fax: 854-4566 fax: 854-4457

Velva L. Price 

Travis County District Clerk 

Travis County Courthouse Complex 

P.O. Box 679003 

Austin, Texas 78767-9003

 

November 22, 2016 

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle 

Third Court of Appeals 

P.O. Box 12547 

Austin, Texas 78711-2547 

RE: 03-16-00711-CV; D-1-GN-15-000379 

Dear Mr. Kyle, 

A clerk’s record in cause number, D-1-GN-15-000379 and Court of Appeals number 

03-16-00711-CV, styled, SALTWORKS VENTURES, INC. VS. RESIDENCES AT THE SPOKE, LLC 

& TRANSWESTERN DEVELOPMENT, was due in your office November 17, 2016. This office has 

not received payment, affidavit of inability to pay, or a designation of clerk’s record as of today, 

November 22, 2016. 

Sincerely, 

 i|vàÉÜ|t V{tÅuxÜá Travis County Deputy District Clerk 

 Civil Division 

 Court Clerk assigned to Honorable Orlinda Naranjo 

 P.O. Box 679003 

 Austin, Texas 78767 

 512-854-8956
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _
Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 3 D0 03 3 . ROOSEVELT BYRD v

. THE STATE.

On Au g u s t 9
, 2 0 2 2
, Ro o s ev el t By rd fi l ed t h is ap p l i cat i on fo r d i s cret i o n ary

rev i ew o f t he t ri al co u rt ’ s J un e 2 9 , 2 0 2 2 o rd er d en y i n g By rd ’ s “ M o t i o n fo r Rel eas e

o f Do cu m en t s , M o t i o n fo r Defau l t J u d g m en t , an d M o t i o n fo r Su m m ary Ju d g m en t .”
W e l ack ju ri sd ict i o n b ecau s e t h e ap p l i cat io n i s u n t i m el y

. To b e t i m el y , an ap p l i cat i o n fo r d i s cret io n ary rev i ew m u st b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0
d ay s of en t ry o f t he o rd er o r ju d g m en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. See O CGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (d ). As

t h i s ap p l i cat i o n was fi l ed 4 1 d ay s aft er en try o f t h e o rd er at i s su e, t he ap p li cat i o n i s

u n t i m el y an d i s h ereb y D ISM ISSED. See Cr o s s o n v. Co n wa y , 2 9 1 Ga. 2 2 0
, 2 2 0 (1 ) (7 2 8 SE2 d 6 17 ) (2 0 1 2 ); s ee al s o Bo yl e v. S t a t e , 1 9 0 G a. Ap p

. 7 3 4
, 7 3 4 (3 80 SE2 d 5 7 ) (1 9 8 9) (“ Th e req u i rem en t s o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 are ju ri s di ct io n al an d th i s [C] o u rt

can n ot accep t an ap p eal n o t m ad e i n co m p li an ce t h erewi t h

. ”).

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. August 22, 2022

08/22/2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000353191
<NAME> NORTH VALLEY BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           9,635
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,083
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                22,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     19,564
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          34,317
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            36,357
<LOANS>                                        180,924
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,702
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,791
<DEPOSITS>                                     247,383
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,517
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,191
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 281,791
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 11,625
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,527
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                15,152
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,475
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,475
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,677
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,160
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 728
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,053
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,053
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,918
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .79
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.53
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,681
<LOANS-PAST>                                       187
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,702
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,238
<RECOVERIES>                                        78
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,702
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :
A1 7 A1 03 7 . ROY GARDNER v . STANLEY W I LLI AMS, W ARDEN.

Ro y Gard n er ap peal s t h e t ri al co u rt ’ s o rd er d en y i n g h i s ap p li cat i o n fo r a wri t

o f h ab eas co rp u s. Th e Su p rem e Co u rt , h o wev er, h a s a p p el l at e ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er al l

cas es i n v o l v i n g h ab eas co rp u s

. See Ga. Co ns t

. o f 1 9 8 3 , Art

. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (4 ). Th i s ap p eal i s t herefo re TRANSFERRED t o t h e Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p os i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y th a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 

## February 13, 2017

02/13/2017
REF ID:A66512 

.., - ~ .. ~.. T DE~RTMENT INTERNAL MlurE. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-25 2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

~ ~ Sub3ect EO 3.3(h) (2) f ~ c;<_ 5 ~ ~_.3> PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

.. . • .... t~· ' • b 

!I 

,. .. -. • ~ • 

; ! ~ r. ' . "' 

' 

' 1~ ~ 

.. , 

"" 

"' 

• "" 

"" 

'~ l 

' ' ., 

• ,. 

,. 

• 

• • 

~I ~ 

""- ·1 ~. -4 

- ,. ... .. If ~ ._.. 

!II 

~ 

..... .... 

• • I 

Ml!» '#. Yi 

... ~ 

'·""' ~ 

.• ~ ; ~ 

J I 

4 , .. 

~ 

I I ~· • 

·~ I ~ 

~ 

11 

"' ~ ~ 

'/}~ 

-~ l ~ • 

;,._ \ 

"" I ~ :;.I! 

~·I ~ ~ l ~~ /{ 

• ~ 

'· ~ I 

- ,-

• • • ~ .. ~ 

~ Ii .. "* . ~ • 41'.•·· 

I -~ ~ !'-

~ I ~ 

~ ~ • "' ., ... .. 

I ~ 

.,, . " • " '"" 

~ .. ~ ,. I ~ 

, 4 ' • •t ,,. 

l 

~-

' ~ 1· ~-

- ~ 

~ 

,., ,... 

, ) II 

~ ' ' 

I ~ 

... ,_, :. 

•• 

I! I ... '- ~ 

,. ~ 

I.- ... ... ~ 

~ " • /!: 

.,_ 

~ 

I I ~ I - L ,. .. 

~ 

~ I • 

• ,. 

, ~ 

,, \ 

« 

"' ::<'!: 

~ 

~ j 

-ii· 

' 

I , ~j .. .,... - ~ 

. 

I 

After Action 

• ·I " . 1 

I 

, ~ 

~~ • 'I. I ~ 

" ... j 

~ • I I • -~ '# I i! ~ • .. .. ,, 

I 

' ·" ,. ' I. I -~ 'I • ~ 

• ' ~ 

~· 

z 

~'-' ' ' ·' ~ 

" t • . . 

• 

J 

" •· .. • • 

;..: I . . , ~ ~ • 

. II "-l ,. 

• "" 

~ 

I 

~ 

l• 'I. 

• ~.-:., ~ " •I· 
OGA 
• REF ID: A66512 • 

T DEff"ARTMENT INTERNAL M~UTE. 

Subject 3. 3 (h) (2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Referred to 

• 

• 

After Action 

8104
REF ID:A40347 

-"'----!-~"' ~ 1-2(---- ----'--+v--~ "~-1'"' ~'5. cJc.r.,.. .a, •• •14t ~ - - -

--"'----i-=:;..::.::.Jjlr-·___.4,,...~~ ~~ / .USQTA M f ~.../ ..-

--~-~~f- #d'#cl 0>f't:b-I- /9~ C,CA.c., A.16C, ~--c..z-~t?·•<Y•;i. ~ 

-----'---l-·---'-.r;.'4.A~Mlok .... d!!l!li!H~&.e!!!:4'c!il!!!!7~ .Al«J~ AJJ.? ~ -----------___.__ 

--~~--=-a...__~---°7.-~ ;P ~ -~~c<ie1...:~ 

----+----I4-~~·--U-~ ~~_A. .d,&~ 

·-____._-l----~-c..c.c.oi.-...--,_ ·~~ ~s~,). 

e, ~.J'~ ~·~-#- AM< t~ ~ :.o ~ __ _ 

- --~ -~-/-~~c;l!c~~-~~-­

~ J¥·" .. ;Jt;UHr--.. ~~ ~ 

___ _.__-+- _____ ..,.........4.._~7' a.. ~---- """'f ·-

-'--

e-

~~~~~~----~---~'V>-/ 

u;;r--;Z.hiC 

r __ ____,_____ - - - -- - - -

_ ___._I -+-I 

I 

-~-

- ___ , __ ..... 

-------- _....::....::....::,..:;:::.:::;;::=:;::::==:;:::::::::;::;:;;;::;::=::;::;::::;::;:::::::;:;;:::;::;::::::::===::;;;;::;:::::;::;:;;~ - - - - @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-26-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
' WAR ~ 1..11;;.r n 

A:W..iLM7..D 

n. 1 m 1:.n 1 1. 

CLASSIFIED MESSAGE CENTER 

,. . - INCOMING CLASSIFIED MESSAGE 

?.tJ{il.f,&.,A5E fl'OT REQU!Rlmlk HA:JD1..iE AS OQ!i.iY'!:B~PIAD 00~"'l"!S~iO!rnfi!r·1l~ 

PER PARAS 5l.l. end 60o. ( 4) ~ AR 38{>-5 

. 

" 

at~te DepaFtflle:rit; Dept o! the Army ~{tUJbinst~n DC 

{State pa.ssi!d) 

5 If.!c 11 n.m .. 

Seo~i tJJ Oft.toar Ar.1eP1CUl\ bbasey, fH.gnal 0~.tiecr 

BUOOM; ~1gnal Offieer M~O eon~u~ sp~ee availlibl& he~~ for 

.t.ns tallethm BIGTOl' &1\tBTBL 3721, lio7aebet• 181 not suf~ic:f.~ni,l7 

tieiCY~v ~ Plan fo'tt separate a11d early rfimodelil'S or C::>d.'1 rooJ~ 

c:ps.oe u.~de:r disouasl?n .now. Reco\'im~nd eql.t1prt~'lt be hal..t et 

EUC<Jii tri.til spaca l"&li.dy ror pertr.JUlGnt 1.r.usta.Jl:» G10llt 

Sent Depnrtmon tt 3881 ro1;ea ted .Frankf't'l"t 84,. 

End .. 

~ ~lY l't~: 3721 not identified in stto 

ACTION:. SIG 

lNFO:t: lD {ASA) 4 l' 

~ 

~ -lo. .ft. 

CM lN 1209 ~ ... , ............ 

(6 Dee A7) lJT<! l/Tpm hjm 

..... l au; ,., 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

COPY_ f!(O~ 1 

1liE MAKING OF AN 2XACT COPY 0.t:" THJS .Mt:..'$SAGE IS P'ORBlODf;M
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-2040

JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., google.search,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

THERESA CARROLL BUCHANAN, U.S. Magistrate Judge,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda Wright Allen, District 

Judge. (2:12-cv-00324-AWA-TEM)

Submitted: February 5, 2013 Decided: February 11, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. appeals the district court’s 

order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. 

Buchanan, No. 2:12-cv-00324-AWA-TEM (E.D. Va. June 18, 2012). 

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
99-1140.

#### State v. Hurd.

Franklin App. No. 96APA03-326.

Pfeifer and Cook, JJ., dissent.
REF ID:A69614 

~:: l '~· r1-J..:.:.r~ I IAL 

81.lllJUMt 

.. w. 3454 

\ 91!4.Y 19bt 

DJICTa lttzmt.e• or tbe' .-tioaal .. curt~ Apnq leiat1f1e 

Mrieo:r.Y a.rd ... 1'1118 

IOI C: a u»'•r 

u. e .. Mr Poree leom'1~ lerv1ce .. AlrtoDio, !eaa 

Mtzu llCl/O 

a. ,·*»»ed 1111rcrte• ~ u. 6-1 April lJSS -ti. or 

tbe a.-ticral. leeur1'Q' ~ lcie<t.tie A4't'1.eor1 b.r4 are 

torwar.w tor ;raar !z4'armt1on 8114 ntet10ll. the a1mitee 

w1U IT P 1D 'teat&t1ft, bo'""91".1 UAt.11 tlie mat brd. .-.Ring. 

'IA/Rt Verbal agreement between Mr. William F. 

J'r1ednm and 1tr. William Brann, Al'SS.1 

that .AJ'88 voul4 receift copiee at IBASAB 

:minutes. 

?!Apt Jl.J. Scott/.M•i•t· to 8/l/854937JJ!Ha:¥55 

CONFID~F~TIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-08-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
Yuneec Q500 Typhoon 

The Yuneec Q500 Typhoon (UA) will be the aircraft referred to in the petition 

submitted by Petitioner: Kenneth Williams

 5401 Autumn LN.

 Dickinson, Texas 77539

 281-914-3109

This UA has an excellent performance rating and excellent review history. The 

manufacture reports less than a 4% return rate on this UA (the less than 4% 

includes ANY type of return issue) This implicates that the UA has an exceptional 

safety/performance record.

The UA has several safety features including: GNSS&GLONASS GPS, GPS Hold, 

Home (return auto pilot), low battery warning, including returning to home if low 

battery warning is ignored, smart mode, allowing the UA to operate directly by 

stick direction rather than UA’s positioning, viewable transmitter screen 

displaying GPS location, altitude, speed, distance from transmitter, satellite 

connections. The transmitter utilizes 2.4GHz allowing no interference in 

transmitting signal. The UA has auto land, compass sensor, Air Pressure sensor 

and the weight of the UA is less than 4lbs operational weight. The UA is limited to 

a flight height of 400ft. the UA has a 25 minute flight time, and petitioner will limit 

flights to 25% of the listed flight time to ensure battery life during the operational 

flight.

Information obtained from: Yuneec USA

 5555 Ontario Mills Parkway

 Ontario, CA. 91764

1-855-284-8888

 USCS@yuneec.com

See attached documentation provided from the above “Yuneec USA”
### petition for exemption/rulemaking

Prisma areal photography sean andrew goodwin 9910 ne 135th pl kirkland wa 98034 425 - 877 - 6140 seangoodwin17@gmail.com section 333 i am asking for the exemption to fly for real - estate advertising. if granted i will be using my drone to the safest possible. i would be using the drone for the purpose of aerial photography advertising. i will be taking certain safety measures every time I’m about to fly. before even flying i would

- check the area i am fl ying in

- log were/when/weather/signiture

- make sure people aren’t present in the area I’m flying in, and if so if it would be okay with me flying around them.

- check the status of my drones parts,(legs, propellers, antennas, camera, ect.

-fly the route i planned with precision

- saftly land the drone

-turn off drone and store away. i myself would be the only one flying this drone and only for the purpose of work. i recently have over 50 hours of flight time with zero accidents or fatalities. i would ta ke every percussion with this drone and never abuse the privilege of using it.i would not fly in weather that could cause an accident, thus meaning if there is poor visibility, no visibility, winds are to strong, rain, snow, and any other natural occurance i will not be flying for my safety and the safety of others. here are the specs of the drone i would be using. Specs: Cameras: Compatible with GoPro® HERO3, 3+ and 4; optimized for HERO3+ and 4 Streaming video quality: 720p Flight time: 25 minutes; 20 minutes with payload* Range: .5 miles** (.8 km)Max speed: 55 mph (89 km/h)

Max ascent speed: 10 m/s in stabilize mode; 5 m/s in “fly” mode Max descent speed: ditto Max payload: 420 g Max altitude: 400 ft per FAA regulation, use r adjustable (122 m) Motors: 880 kV Propellers: 10 ′′ diameter 4.5 ′′ pitch self-tightening (24 cm diameter 144 cm pitch); glass - reinforced nylon Autopilot: Pixhawk 2 Software: APM:Copter Communication: 3DR Link secure W iFi network Frequency: 2.4 GHz We ight: 3 .3 lbs. (1.5 kg) / 3.9 lbs. (1.8 kg) with GoPro® and Solo Gimbal Dimensions: 10 in. tall (25 cm), 18 in. (46 cm) motor-to - motor Flight battery: Lithium polymer 5200 mAh 14.8 Vdc Battery charge time: ~1.5 hours Controller battery: 2600 mAh 7.2 Vdc rechargea ble lithium ion App requirements: iOS 8.0 or later / Android 4.3 or later *Flight time varies with payload, wind conditions, elevation, temperature, humidity, flying style and pilot skill. Listed flight time applies to elevations less than 2,000 ft above sea level. **Depending on environmental conditions; controller is expandable, allowing us or third parties to amp up the range in the future.Solo Smart Battery:

Rechargeable lithium polymer (Li - Po) 5200 mAh 14.8 Vdc We ight: 1 lb. (.5 kg) Solo Gimbal: Three - axis stabilization Fully compatible with 3DR Solo and GoPro HERO3+ and HERO4; camera charging and stabilization only with HERO3 HDMI video output Wi reless software upgrade through Solo Controllable range: 0° to - 90° pitch