alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             144
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      143
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   288
<PP&E>                                              50
<DEPRECIATION>                                      46
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,336
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,629
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            94
<OTHER-SE>                                    (11,387)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,336
<SALES>                                            669
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   669
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 531
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (331)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (331)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (331)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.035)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.035)
        

</TABLE>
\ 

CROSS ~i!:X f.HE . T 

• 

File undE;r :No. Department-State Dute 15' Nov 48 

Type of Correspondenco: Radiogram CI IN 2871 

Subject: Clearance of Personnel 

!i'rorn: Seoul, Korea 

TO: State Dept. Info.ID 

Clnssificution' GONFIBBN~IAJ:. 

~nopsis: InSormation is requested as to whether Mr. Clive 

Edward Knowlson State Dept. civilian employee of the American Mission in Korea has been cleared to handle cryptograp- hic materials. 

Note: This message has been relayed to State Dept. 

Documont filed under No, Personnel-Investigation &1Clearance "' 

for Crypto Duties. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

CSGJ.S !•'orn rro. 67 

2b September 1~46 

(Rev 1) 

--00llfmt'4l\ll 

. ·-
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of A.T.N.J., A.J., and T.L.J., Jr., Children

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00844

- CV

Trial court case number: 2013

- 33236

Trial court: 311th District Court of Harris County

On November 24, 2015, the Clerk of this Court forwarded the pro se affidavit of indigence for appellate costs filed by appellant, T.L.J., Sr., to the trial clerk requesting an indigent clerk’s record be filed in this Court by December 23, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(c)(1). On November 30, 2015, the court reporters f iled info sheets in this Court noting that there were no reporter’s records taken. On February 17, 2016, the trial clerk filed an information sheet in this Court stating that there was no contest to appellant’s affidavit of indigence filed in the trial co urt due to the late filing. See id. 20.1(e)(1). On

March 9 , 2016, the trial clerk filed the original cl erk’s record in this Court

.

Accordingly, the allegations in the affidavit of indigence are deemed true, and appellant is entitled to proceed without advance payment of appellate costs. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. at 20.1(f). However, because there is no reporter’s record and the clerk’s record

ha s already been filed in this Court , t he Clerk of this Court is ORDERED to deem t he appellant indigent and that he is allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment

of costs for purposes of the appellate filing fee and the clerk’s and reporter’s record fee s

.

Furthermore, this Court generally has appellate jurisdiction over appeals only from final orders arising under the Texas Family Code unless a statute authorizes an interlocutory appeal. S e e T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 109

. 0 02 ( b ) ( W e s t Supp. 2 01 5 ) ( “ A n

a pp e a l m a y b e t a k en b y a n y p ar t y t o a su i t fr o m a f in al o r d e r r e n d er e d u nd e r t h i s

t i tl e.”). Thus, to the extent appellant intended that his notice of appeal

, challeng ing the trial court’s refusal to act, be construed as a mandamus petition , appellant’s counsel is

directed to file a motion with the Clerk of this Court within 10 days of the date of the2

Order to designate his appeal as an original proceeding and requesting an extension of time to file a petition that complies with Rule 52. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 2. 1, 52. 3

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: / s/ Laura Carter Higley

 Acting individually

Date: M arch 15, 2016
#### Kruczinski and others, Respondents, vs. Neuendorf and wife, imp., Appellants.

*March*24

*April 12, 1898.*

*Kruezinski v. Neuendorf, ante,*p. 264, followed.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Milwaukee county: D. H. JoHNSON, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*J. G. Officer,*for the appellants.

For the respondents there was a brief by *John 0. Keefe*and *John 8. Maxwell,*and oral argument by *Mr. Keefe.*

Cassoday, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling the demurrer interposed by the appellants to the complaint, which alleges, in effect, the same facts as in the other case brought by the same plaintiffs against these appellants and others *{ante,*p. 264), except as to the facts here*272inafter stated, to the effect that January 10, 1890, the defendants *John F. Neuendorf*and wife conveyed by warranty deed to the defendants August and Maria Kowalski the west half of the land described; that August 20, 1891, the said August and Maria Kowalski made, executed, and delivered to the defendant Horace S. Weeks, as trustee, their certain mortgage, covering the land last described, to secure the payment of $750 three years after date, with interest at seven per cent., payable semi-annually, which mortgage was recorded August 31, 1891; that February 21, 1895, the said August and Maria Kowalski conveyed by warranty deed to the defendant Frank Drewinak the land last described, subject to the mortgage for $750, which deed recited a consideration of $1,500, and was duly recorded February 25, 1895. The complaint prays judgment, as in the other case, and ■that the mortgage to Horace S. Weeks, as trustee, be declared null and void, so far as the interests of the plaintiffs •in this action are concerned, and that their interests may be released from the pretended lien and incumbrance of the said mortgage, and the cloud be removed; that the plaintiffs may have and recover of and from the defendants Frank Drewinak and *John F. Neuendorf*and August Kowalski $1,500, for their undivided one-half interest in the rents and profits; and for general relief, with costs and disbursements.

For the reasons given in the opinion filed in the other ■case, the- order of the circuit court is affirmed.

*By the*Oowrt.— Order affirmed.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
                                                        EXHIBIT 27
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                         116,767
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  260,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                    50,260
<INVENTORY>                                    155,326
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               549,805
<PP&E>                                         202,472
<DEPRECIATION>                                  68,494
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 686,855
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          244,705
<BONDS>                                         45,722
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       274,992
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   686,855
<SALES>                                        361,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               361,344
<CGS>                                          254,065
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  254,065
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,077
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,461
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 35,330
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,316
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             23,014
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,014
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .17
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                       6,950,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               860,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,810,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          245,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,515,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,810,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                89,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### Record 

# or Discussion Docket No. 

## FAA - 2013 

# -o 360 Directorate I dentifier: 07-AD - 63RI-AD 

## ZcJ If -A)M 

## -/6 3-A D With whom outs i de the FAA ha s this AO action been discus se d (i.e. , Design Approvn l Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)'?



### ORGANIZATI ON PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOP I CS DISCUSS ED

**Boei ~**  J<Jmes

**Ma~ar** 4/1 / 2010 Concur ATA Joe White 4/112010 No response Boeing Richnrd Weiner & 3 / 1 / 2014 Opermor commen ts on Christo phe Vrillacq origi n a l release of SB. Sc hedu l e for releas e of revised Sl3 addressing concerns.

Othe r/Additio nal Informat i on :
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 24.3

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and
Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful
attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his
name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON
CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Form 10-K") under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or
on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and
any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other
writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection
therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory
body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full
power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and
necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and
purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all
that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or
substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 27th
day of March, 2003.



                                                    /s/  Howard Gittis
                                                    ------------------------
                                                         HOWARD GITTIS
(: -~~·r.~fi .. ;.j,ijj;.16~~1'f:it~ N. a.~' .. ; \ I• ~ ;:, "' 

1

-- ' , . . • • j'I r '1: .._ I '\O l I -t '"i: 

J ' ~ ·t~>lr/ I ' > ,/ 

--~ 0: -. .I rl'" '. If. L .-. f .,}~ 

!'!{ . • •. .,~,: •• . . ~1 " ,.,, I f ,. _- . 

/ ~ ~.~;. "~ '• .i t'~'~: ., ... 1 , ~ ~ 11 .. ! r'tlr . ·~ " . :i r If I ·/_ f 1t 

- ... 

.. ~ '. i ~if I h if t~i I f ~ ! 

m p I , . r.. • I·~ , ~ I •'~,~~ ~ , 11 ' ilff J; i I ~ r i rs 'I 'I · f I i ,~ .. f I lJ f 

I (f I f l:t'wt I ¥ ~ , ;:r r~ ;i i,lf, I : 

J 'if rf f r f I S ~ 1·~ Ii 1• if l'ti~ w ~ :- ~ r "f "t . I (f ~ 

!~-~ I JJ_ !,, !I ~!f .: I 

••( ~~ .,'K ~rlf1 • • 11 · r r ~ . 'J i" ~ .. ·~ \\ i · I e t • ~ ;, ~~ ~ : .~\ \ If JI ;i i ll(i~ ~ , 1r~ - a~ ·. r I 

~ .,)l~ ~.~ -~ ~ ~ '.. ~ ••'(' . f ~ I - w --~ I \ ( ~ ~1 (j) 

I \ ' ~
Exhibit 32.2



Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.



Certification of Principal Financial Officer



I, William T. McGann, Chief Financial Officer of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



To the best of my
knowledge and belief, based upon a review of this annual report on Form 10-K of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, and, except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent report:



| |  |  | this annual report of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in this annual report on Form 10-K of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ William T. McGannWilliam T. McGannChief Financial OfficerFebruary 27, 2006
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley D. Slye, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 14, 2008
        /s/ Bradley D. SlyeBradley D. SlyeChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








---
| (1)   | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ David A. Martin                                                                                                            |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David A. MartinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
99-1182.

#### Brooks v. Dickinson.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
#### Fairbank and another vs. Newton.

*February 3, 1880.*

*Costs in Supreme Court.*

Where no direction is given to the clerk of this court *ichen a case is decided,*in respect to the taxation for printing cases and briefs, he will tax for such disbursements according to the rules on the subject of taxation, without undertaking to determine whether the cases and briefs conform to the rules of this court in respect to such papers; and a taxation so made in this case, is affirmed.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Dodge*County.

The judgment of the circuit court in this cause was reversed at the January term, 1879, of this court, and the cause remanded for further proceedings. 46 Wis., 644. Afterwards the respondents appealed from the taxation of costs in this court.

*Eli Hooker,*for respondents.

*8. U.*Pinney, for appellant.

Cole, J.

This is an ajopeal from *the*taxation of costs by the clerk. It was objected on the taxation by the clerk, that the appellant should not be allowed costs for printing the entire case and briefs, because they were unnecessarily voluminous. It is said that the case and brief might have been condensed into comparatively few pages, and would have been, had the rules of this court in regard to the preparation of cases and briefs been observed by appellant’s counsel.

In some instances, where this court thought there was a plain disregard of the rules in respect to the printing of cases and briefs, direction has been given to the clerk in the opinion, as to the -taxation of costs for the printing. When this case was decided, no such direction waas given, and we therefore think the clerk properly taxed the costs in favor of the appellant for printing the case and brief. For, in the absence of a *385direction by the court, it is obvious it would impose upon the clerk the performance of a most difficult and perplexing duty to require him to examine a case and brief, and determine whether they had been prepared according to the rules. Indeed, it -would be quite impossible for the clerk intelligently to do this. The members of .this court, who have to examine the cases and briefs, can better .tell whether the rules have been disregarded in their preparation or not. So, in all cases where no direction is given to the clerk when the case is decided, in respect to the taxation for printing cases and briefs, he will tax for such disbursements according-to his established rules.

*By the Court.*— The taxation by the clerk is affirmed.
clth_ex1024.htm


Exhibit 10.24


 


 


AMENDMENT No. 3 TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


This Amendment No. 3 to the Promissory Note, originally dated September 1, 2010 (the “Note”), previously amended February 11, 2011 and May 31, 2011 (the “Amendments”), is entered into as of the 29th day of July, 2011, by and between CMS Acquisition, LLC (“CMS”) and CleanTech Biofuels, Inc. (“CTB”).


 


WHEREAS, the Note is secured by the CTB owned U.S. Patent No. 6,306,248 pursuant to a Security Agreement dated as of September 1, 2010, between CMS and CTB (the “Security Agreement”);


 


WHEREAS, a payment of $25,000 was made on February 11, 2011 for interest to date and principal, by CTB on the Note;


 


WHEREAS, as of May 16, 2011, the rate to accrue interest increased to 10.0% per annum (from 9.0% per annum); and


 


WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the terms of the Note as set forth below.


 


NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
The Maturity Date, as defined in the Amendments, shall be changed to October 15, 2011 from July 15, 2011.







 



	
2.  

	
All remaining terms and conditions of the Note and Security Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.







 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CTB and CMS have caused this Amendment No. 3 to the Note to be executed and delivered by their duly authorized officers as of the day and year set forth above.


 


 




	 	 
CLEANTECH BIOFUELS, INC.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Name: Edward P. Hennessey	 
	 	 	Title:   CEO	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 









	 	 
CMS Acquisition, LLC

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	 	 
	 	 	Name: 	 
	 	 	Title: