alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 233 

To designate the Rocksprings Station of the U.S. Border Patrol located 

on West Main Street in Rocksprings, Texas, as the ‘‘Donna M. Doss 

Border Patrol Station’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Mr. CRUZ, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To designate the Rocksprings Station of the U.S. Border 

Patrol located on West Main Street in Rocksprings, 

Texas, as the ‘‘Donna M. Doss Border Patrol Station’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Donna M. Doss Memo5 rial Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 

8 (1) A native of the State of Washington, Agent 

9 Donna Marie Doss— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 233 IS

1 (A) proudly and honorably served her 

2 country as an Agent of the U.S. Border Patrol 

3 for more than 15 years; 

4 (B) began her service with the U.S. Border 

5 Patrol in 2003; and 

6 (C) graduated as part of the 569th Session 

7 of the Border Patrol Academy with Class 584 

8 on June 6, 2005. 

9 (2) Agent Doss— 

10 (A) served on a Drug Enforcement Admin11 istration Task Force on the southern border for 

12 3 years before being assigned to the northern 

13 border; 

14 (B) was promoted to Supervisory Border 

15 Patrol Agent in Laredo Border Patrol Sector, 

16 where she was named an Operations Officer in 

17 2016; and 

18 (C) relocated to Abilene, Texas in 2017, 

19 where she served as a Resident Agent. 

20 (3) On February 2, 2019, Agent Doss re21 sponded to a call for assistance from the Texas De22 partment of Public Safety near Interstate 20 in Tye, 

23 Texas. While on scene, Agent Doss was struck and 

24 killed by a passing vehicle. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 233 IS

1 (4) Agent Doss is survived by her husband, fa2 ther, mother, 2 stepchildren, a sister and a brother. 

3 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

4 The Rocksprings station of the U.S. Border Patrol 

5 located on West Main Street in Rocksprings, Texas, shall 

6 be known and designated as the ‘‘Donna M. Doss Border 

7 Patrol Station’’. 

8 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

9 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

10 paper, or other record of the United States to the station 

11 described in section 3 shall be deemed to be a reference 

12 to the ‘‘Donna M. Doss Border Patrol Station’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
Ãflfi‘¤—⁄›—“Ã¤“ÃÕ×“ÃŒ—‹À›Ã×—“Õ–¤›×⁄×›ÃflÃ×—“Õ“—Ã×›¤Õfl“‹...flŒ“×“ŸÕ⁄››×“⁄—Œ”flÃ×—“fiflÃÃ¤Œ«...flŒ“×“ŸÕfl“‹ÀÕflŸ¤ŸÀ×‹¤‘×“¤Õ–Œ¤–flŒ×“ŸÃÿ¤›Ÿ—ÓÛŸfi×“ÕÃfl‘‘×“ŸÃÿ¤–Œ—–¤‘‘¤ŒÕœÎððÙ›Ÿ—ÓÛŸfifl“‹ÕÃÔð—¤Œ×¤...ÔÓÌÏÎÍÈËÁÔðÔÔÔÓÔÌÔÏÔÎÔÍÔÈÔËÔÁÓðÓÔÓÌÓÏÓÓÕÃÔð‹×Õ–‘fl«ÁÔðÔÔÔÓÔÁÔËÔÈÔÍÔÏÔÎÔÌÍÎÓÔÌÏËÈÕÃÔðfl››¤ÕÕ—Œ×¤Õ⁄‘×ŸÿÃ›—“ÃŒ—‘Õ⁄‘×ŸÿÃ›—“ÃŒ—‘ÕÛÕ”flŒÃ”—‹¤
Exhibit 11

                                      METRIS COMPANIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                         Computation of Earnings Per Share

In thousands, except per share amounts                Year Ended December 31,
                                                     1998       1997      1996
BASIC:
Net income available to common
stockholders ..................................    $56,248    $38,058    $20,016
                                                   =======    =======    =======

Weighted average number of common
 shares outstanding ..........................      19,232     19,225     16,572

Net income per share ..........................    $  2.92    $  1.98    $  1.21

DILUTED:

Net income available to common
stockholders ..................................    $56,248    $38,058    $20,016
                                                   =======    =======    =======
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding ............................     19,232     19,225     16,572
Net effect of assumed exercise of stock
options based on treasury stock
method using average market price .............        736      1,013        557
                                                    ------     ------     ------
                                                    19,968     20,238     17,129
                                                    ------     ------     ------


Net income per share ..........................    $  2.82    $  1.88    $  1.17
REF ID:A40353 

:.s~ /?.s-;? AJ~c,b_ t,. ~~~~~-\"*9!PC""":...L'~=-;..._:_-=.Jio!-..__:_=-.::~:....=..::.....11a-__ ~------~~-~-~------

4'.•ws c<"*'-' 7../l.'f 111 / d:.,4,,;μ ~~Ue, -==i' 

__ +~ 

.. ~./ ,,. ... ...,._..,£-4 ~ ,A..J,,,,<u-cJ_df,,.,.,,._~ 

-------11'--__.c;.,f._,/L-!:...Jtl',"""~<---..Glic..«,,,. •rru·.!1-4- ,,1..4_ AJc&nucttf? Qr<«,,,,, .atc•"c' /?~ 

----- -+----""'~""""""'of '"""4i'te4 ... ,4UJ ~~ iL-4 ~?<~ ?~_..,.,._{J., 

I I ~ ~ ""'~ .. ~ J ~ """~~ c!!w- ( ... ~C4<.<.,~ ~ ~($- / 

~ _,,, ~- ,_,,., ......... -~---· L_A .&- • 1' 

- ~- -- , • -~ ' ' 

-

~ 

Cl~ ~ ,..,z? .~ .. ...u. •""- H , ............ d~e~c 

- - ----~/ ~-?!.....f·-~~ q....J Cou6)~ «-< Sllu? ·-fl! -~-

- -- ~ ~ c-...-s- cJ"'f ~~ ~~ c.-

-- . J - =- ' ~~ o.J:l·.1,..;~ ~~ ~~ 

-- - >?<C-AfJ-£. ~ ~--~-~14·/;)-¥ ... !o· ..... _~ 

~#'/~ 

~ 

~ ~ ~ ~ 

)J 

- +~·,. 

- - -- -

----- --- - - - - - - - - -

. , - - - - -~ ~~_, 

- . - - - - " r - - ' r- ...... - -

- --------

' - __ ... ______ 

- ------ -

- --

. ~ 

,.... -- -

- ~--

- --

--- ------

I ....,.-.- , 

-- - - - ------ - - -

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-26-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
# C_2014308EN.01000101.xml

| 11.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 308/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 308/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7314 — Nordic Capital/Gina Tricot)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 308/01

On 1 September 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7314. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7314. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
REF ID:A516625 

Walter F.mery 

435 s. Curson Ave. 

Los Angeles 36, Calif. 

The Chief Signal Of fie er, 

War Dept., Pentagon Bldg. , 

Washington 25, D. C. 

Sir: 

c 0 p y 

February 16, 1953 

On January 1, 1942, I offered my services to Lt. Col. 

Wm. F. Friedman ( ret), Principal Cryptanalyst, of the Code 

and Cipher Section as a volunteer translator of any French 

or Spanish textbooks or treatises on cryptography. I 

explained that my age precluded me from any acti. ve service but 

that I thought I might be of value on translating foreign 

books, which might be used in training courses in the War 

Department. I was then living at 825 Fifth Ave., N. Y. City. 

Mr. Friedman replied on Jan. 9, 1942,. acceptihg my offer, 

and asked me to start with a took by de Viarl. s, entitled 

"The Art of Enciphering and Deciphering Secret Messages. 11 

Later, I translated "Secret Ciphers Revealed," by Com. 

Bazeries, 1901, and "De la Cryptographie,n by P. Valerio, 1893. 

Various letters bore the file numbers SPSIS-3, or SPSIS 311.5 

General. The last one I have seems to be that of 29 July, 1943, 

from Headquarters, Services of Supply. 

At no time was Mr. Friedman certain that tre se translations would be printed. I have not heard from him since 

July 29, 1943. 

I would like to know if they were printed. If not, 

is there any objection to my using the translations for any 

purpose that does not tie in with your department? I have 

no plans in the matter arrl do not anticipate using the 

translations in any way. However, I still have the very 

bulky copy of my tranlations and see no purpose in keeping 

ttem, if they are no use to any one. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ Walter Emery 

pproved for Release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526
1 From:
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 2:47 PM

To: RedHill Subject: Comments on AOC

Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged

To Whom It May Concern:

Hawaii and its people have played host to various br anches of the United St ates military for many years and although we have not always agreed with decisi ons and actions taken by the United States military regarding the Hawaiian Islands, we have continued to accommodate their needs. As time passes, it becomes more and more clear that this re lationship is not reciprocal and that the United States military has very little regard for the islands and the people who have taken care of them.

The fuel tank leak at Red Hill is further evidence that the United States D epartment of De fense does not care about Hawaii or its people. Not only was the United States Navy aw are of fuel potentially leaking from their storage t anks, but they did very little to corre ct the problem. It took 27,000 gallons of fuel spillage from one tank for them to act on this threat by in creasing the “frequency of monitoring” rather than permanently fixing the pr oblem and decreasing the possibilit y of a disaster. With twenty fuel tanks in this area, capable of holding 250 m illion gallons of fuel betw een them, the probability for

another leak in the same or different fuel tank is very high and could damage our drinking water supply for years to come.

As a branch of government tasked wit h protecting people, the United St ates Navy has a duty to take care of Hawaii’s people by accepting res ponsibility for the fuel leak and following the recommendations of the City and C ounty of Honolulu’s B oard of Water Supply, the stewards of Oahu’s water supply. The current AOC is not acc eptable and does not clearly outline what will be done to ensure that Oahu’s drinking water supply will be safe and fuel -free in the future. The AOC should hold the Navy accountable fo r cleaning the water that has been already contaminated while requiring the Navy or the U.S. Department of Defense to permanently remedy the situation.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6098

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOHN DAREN HUGHES, a/k/a Ellis Rasheed

Williams, a/k/a L,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-91-209-G)

Submitted: April 15, 1996 Decided: May 3, 1996

Before ERVIN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Daren Hughes, Appellant Pro Se. David Bernard Smith, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence filed under

Fed. R. Crim. P. 33. We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v.

Hughes, No. CR-91-209-G (M.D.N.C. Dec. 12, 1995). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 08, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 08, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0138. JAMES BIDWELL v. THE STATE.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

02CR80
• 

REF ID :A104846 ... 

.,.. . ,,,, ' -• 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-12-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
CERTIFICATION

I, Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Air T,
     Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
     untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
     material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this report;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
     financial information included in this report, fairly
     present in all material respects the financial condition,
     results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
     of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are
     responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
     controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
     13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
     caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
     designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant, including its
     consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in
     which this report is being prepared;
     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's
     disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
     report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
     disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
     period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred
     during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has
     materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
     affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
     reporting; and
5.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have
     disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
     control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
     functions):
     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
     the design or operation of internal control over financial
     reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
     the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
     report financial information; and
     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
     management or other employees who have a significant role in
     the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.


Date:  July 29, 2004
 /s/ Walter Clark
Walter Clark
Chief Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

TERRY KINAVEY,

Petitioner

v.

WEST JEFFERSON HILLS SCHOOL 

DISTRICT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS 

OF WEST JEFFERSON HILLS SCHOOL 

DISTRICT,

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 278 WAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of 

Appeal is DENIED.
DroneHoners plans to operate various small unmanned aircraft (UA), all weighing less than five

pounds (for example, the 3DRobotics SOLO and the DJI Phantom 3 gross weight is approximately 3 pounds). The quadcopters will operate on the 2.4GHz frequency band and be equipped with four rotors that are driven by electric motors powered by batteries. The UA will have a maximum airspeed of 30 knots. The UA may or may not include a small, lightweight camera such as a GoPro and wi ll always be operated within visual line
- of
- sight and not within restricted airspace as established by the FAA. DroneHoners plans to operate the UA at locations near Lexington, Kentucky for the following purposes: UA flight training to new hobbyists to encourage safe and responsible operation of UAs as we ll as commercial aerial video and photography services. DroneHoners will be committed to not only practicing safe operation, but also promoting and training others on the safe operation of UAs. DroneHoners will only operate in reasonably safe environments and will conduct extensive preflight inspections and protocols to ensure safety is our top priority. Given the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the aircraft to be utilized by him, we believe an exemption from 14 CFR part 21, Subpart H (Airworthiness Certificates) and § 91.203 (a) and (b) (Certifications required), subject to certain conditions and limitations, is warranted and meets the requirements for an equivalent level of safety under 14 CFR part 11 and Section 333 of P.L. 112
- 95 (Section 333). DroneHoners is requesting an exemption from § 45.23 Marking of the aircraft because our UA will not have a cabin, cockpit or pilot station on which to mark certain words or phrases. Wealso will not have the ability to add two
- inch lettering on such a small aircraft. DroneHoners also is requesting an exemption from §§ 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(2) and 91.417(a) and (b) Maintenance inspections may be required and should be gra nted since they only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. Please note that a s a safety precaution , DroneHoners will perform a preflight inspection of our UAs before each flight. DroneHoners requests an exemption from § 61.113 Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in command as we do not believe possessing a pilot license encompasses all the necessary skills to be a safe UA operator. W e would add that the risks of operating a UA are far less than the risk levels inherent in the comm ercial activities outlined in 14 CFR part 61, et seq., thus we request an exemption from § 61.113

. Rega rding UAS operational training, the operator of DroneHoners has extensive practice flying various UAs as a hobbyist and frequently practices using computerized simulated flights to maintain adequate skills and response reflex time

.
FLORIDA-CARIBBEAN CRUISE 

ASSOCIATION,

Petitioner,

v.

BISCAYNE BAY PORT PILOTS, 

INC.,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-2391

Opinion filed November 9, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Prohibition.

Thomas F. Panza of Panza, Maurer, & Maynard, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for 

Petitioner.

Donna E. Blanton of Radey Law Firm, Tallahassee, and Robert Peltz of The Peltz 

Law Firm, Miami, Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Marlene K. Stern, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Pilotage Rate Review Committee, for 

Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

B.L. THOMAS, RAY, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
POL-54 • ~ ADDRESS ONLY 

REF ID:A363106 • 

""t, "l'HE COMMISSIONER OP PATENTS 

WA&HINQTON 2't D. C. 

Ex pa.rte 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

WASHINGTON 

Willi am F. Friedman 

Serial No. 549.0S6 

Filed August 11, l.944 

For Etootr.tosl System 

MAit ED 

·MAY 26 19!:>2 

DJVJSJON 10 

In compliance with t~·1e request in the letter 

from the 0.f'tiee ot the Judge .AdYocate General by 

direction O't' the Secretary or the f.:Cmy.._ dated May i;. 1952 th s applica~ion is placed 

under the provisions of U. s. Code, Title 35, Section 37. 

This application will not become abandoned 

prior to the expiration of three years from the date 

of the next Office action. 

Hen'.l."'y B. Sta.utter 

krin3' seeuri ty- .Agency. 'lhe Pentagon · WaShington 25,, D. C. 

Assistant Commissioner 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
THE WASHINGTON POST 

Saturday, September 12, 195J 

** 7 

Experts Warn 

i- On A-Blitz lS · 

ll c ~t onsequences IC 

'd By Nate Haseltine 

li- Pa&t RePorter 

•d A special issue of The Bulle· 

h-' tin of the Atomic Scientists has 

- 1 appealed to the Government to· 

[ give .the American people the 

~~ i facts on atomic war dangers. 

1 I Its guest editors gave their ~ I own version of what those facts· 

would show-a grim picture of Y~ :·a Nation almost totally unpre- J-' pared for a sneak, mass attack 

by A-bomb-carrying enemy 

0

_ planes. ·

1

_ They purport to show that: a 1. One hundred atomic bombs e dropped on our 100 biggest ·e I cities likely would kill 19 million Americans. . · d 2. With present and projected n J air defenses at least half of an n enemy force would get through. r 1 3· We have "an industrial •

1

glass jaw," in that two-fifths of 

d the Nation's industrial capacity 

5 is concentrated in 15 prime 1 target areas. a 4. The Russians now have a d, capability of "bombing every •n j major metropolitan industrial m 'i· area in the United States." . 5· An aerial blitz of Unit~ 

r-. States probably would be staged 

tS 1· across the North polar region· 6. Civil Defense experts feel 

1f \that if United States is attacked 

d it will be the sneak type, in 

's. tremendous force, and probablf s. I simultaneously on all the biii 

h cities· · tl 7. Washington, though a lion. .s ·industrial city, would be givel n a top priority in enei;ny attac 

e plans because this city's devaa 

1

• tation would give the ene~ 

,, "tremendous psychological anil 

propaganda advant~ges. 

~ Writing the Bulletins tntrGductory editorial, Dr. Ralph 'r Lapp, atomic physicist, note\ e that the special issue wa; e prompted by (a) Malenkov's an· e nouncement that Russia has ~- mastered production of the hy· n drogen bomb; (b) the Atomic e Energy Commission's confirma· 

tion that Russia had exploded 

t- such a fusion-type bomb, and 

l- (c) the present condition ol 

it America's defenses. e Civil Defense Administrator 

Val Peterson pointed up the 

d lack of military guarantee to r- detect and avert enemy bomb- o . ings in this c1Juntry. He said he 

l, /could only "hope" that Ameri• <- can scientists "can come up with 

i- devices which the American 

>t people can afford" to erect an c· Arctic radar net to warn of at• 

tacking forces. 

REF ID:A39341
99-727.

#### King v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.

Monroe App. No. 807. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Monroe County.

*1448IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that this cause be consolidated with Supreme Court case No. 99-1264, *King v. Grange Mut. Cas. Co.*

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the briefing schedule be stayed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that case No. 99-727 and 99-1264 are held for the decision in Supreme Court case Nos. 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618, *Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos.*

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.