alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0463. PHILLIP NATHAN KERCH v. THE STATE.

Phillip Nathan Kerch pled guilty to multiple offenses, including malice murder

and felony murder, and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Subsequently, Kerch

filed a motion to withdraw guilty plea. The trial court denied the motion, and Kerch

filed this direct appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

In State v. Murray, 286 Ga. 258 (687 SE2d 790) (2009), the Supreme Court

held that “[i]f the underlying action is a murder case, this Court hasjurisdiction of the

appeal, regardless of whether the order being appealed is based on facts having some

bearing on the underlying criminal trial.” Id. at 259 (1); see also Neal v. State, 290

Ga. 563, 572 (722 SE2d 765) (2012) (Hunstein, J., concurring). Accordingly, this

appeal is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/07/2016

November 07, 2016
Exhibit 4.8
 Credit Agreement
 MAXIMUM SUBLIMITS; LOCAL FRONTING LENDERS
 Local Fronting Lenderand
    
    Denomination
    
    Currency
    
    Maximum
    
    Name of Borrower andLocal Lending Office
    
    Currency
    
    Sublimit
    
    Sublimit
    
    Address for NoticesCitibank, N.A. 
2 Park Street Level
26 
Sydney, N.S.W. 2000 
Australia 
Attn: Glenn Ross
    
    Australian Dollars
    
    US $0
    
    US $1,000,000
    
    Revlon Australia Pty Limited 
12 Julius Avenue 
North Ryde, Sydney NSW 2113 
AustraliaCitibank International Plc -
Paris 
Loans Processing Unit

2nd Floor 
4 Harbour Exchange 
Isle of Dogs 
London E14 9GE 
United Kingdom 
Attn: Asif Mahmood Butt
    
    Euros
    
    US $1,200,000
    
    US $3,000,000
    
    Européenne de Produits de 
Beauté, S.A.S 
64-70 rue du Ranelagh 
75016 Paris, FranceCitibank, N.A. 
49/F, Citibank Tower 
Citibank Plaza 
3 Garden Road, 
Central Hong Kong 
Attn: Julia Pang
    
    Hong Kong
Dollars
    
    US $100,000
    
    US $1,000,000
    
    Revlon (Hong Kong) Limited 
3rd Floor, Eton Tower 
3 Hysan Avenue 
Causeway Bay 
Hong KongCitibank, N.A. 
Foro Buonaparte, 16 
Milano 20121, Italy 
Attn: Elena Codecasa
    
    Euros
    
    US $0
    
    US $3,000,000
    
    Revlon S.p.A. 
Via Piazzale dellIndustria, N.
46 
00144 
Rome, ItalyCitibank, N.A. 
UK Loans Processing Unit

2nd Floor 
4 Harbour Exchange 
Isle of Dogs 
London E14 9GE 
United Kingdom 
Attn: Asif Mahmood Butt
    
    Pounds
Sterling
    
    US $3,400,000
    
    US $10,000,000
    
    Revlon International Corporation (UK
Branch) 
Highgate Studios 
73-85 Highgate Road 
London NW5 1TL, EnglandTOTAL
    
    
    
    US $4,700,000AGGREGATE CURRENCY SUBLIMIT
    
    
    
    US $30,000,000REMAINING AGGREGATE CURRENCY
SUBLIMIT
    
    
    
    US $25,300,000
REF ID:A39619 

~rrlf • JA~ --

I :__ \ 

. - --._._.... .. _..-..... ~-.. ---·~-.... -- ~ 

--

~~~\K~ 

(S~-~) 

~ \'V 10,41:l.._, ~")..~ 1~~ ... 

5 \ s J) \: :ti: 11-

( -:':) ) 

11

~ C.S. E.C. M '' r· 8~~ · 

\\ C \ I~'/\ _.,.Q_ /'ti.... l\ 

r~ - M- I :J4- c_. - ;.:;> q-n-v ~ 

Declassified and a roved for release b NSA on 09-27-2013 ursuant to E. 0. 1352 
: ,, . 

REF ID:A39619 

ICO~fflDE~dTIAU 

IEa ApplloatlGa t. Paten ot * 

IILLUll r" lllllllll, et al • 

• 

Serf.al .... 

'70,412 * 

ftW • 25 luoh 19'6 

• 

• * • * • * * * • * 

!bl Bomble CJowte1lomr ot ra-... 

WuldnatoD 251 D. o. 

..... 

Tlda l• in NQGMe to Pawn ottt.oe aoU• ot 18 1....,. 19'0 s.a the 

abon-lcleditt.l applieat!cm t• patentwhlob ia bei.DI Jft9..W 

PJaue --........ tollolf81 

ll DI l•ll'RAUW 

.... 10, lim 6 • .,... the peiod, iuen - ft will be mleratood. 

t!at OOllWt J4 la Uftlll94 with a aJll'lDI _. ta 

aw ot.her oaannimt tuhioD la adapW to --

tu ..... 1 open OOldlU. ... ,_ •• .-. • 

min1 ot oomutaw 7J ..-..n J2 Sa •t•U•rJi' 

U'l'Ul94 to haft a l&GIN&l.J.r opa OGll4lU.. • • 

20- a.wJ. •eeqw ot •. 

C.-1 .... Jdft" u4 !---' • ..... • • 

Pap 11, Une JI- &tur •u• illllm. (wlalob ta mohud•llr ~ 

NlaW wltb all tb9 Jm7a ot \be bJ'boud 80 U 

to be mftC1 ¢1n ,_. a b7 la MJll'9••t> • • 
REF ID:A39619 

.. - - . . 1¢01'\JFlljcl'\JilALl 

Fap 1'1, 11M 10- Olup •JD• to - U • • 

P..-25,~ 

line 20- Illlert the tollowlDg :s:uapapb. • ta tbl aboft 

mm RH• 

worlJJU.m and ~-..lna puUoaJarJ.r to nawJ, s, ... ,, lt 8lloaJ4 be ~ that the 

... ...i e111 p1aw JOl ue ~ SAenUaal 

• en4 plate J01 Of :rs.-. 1 ... ,. to the .... 

tbat -.ob ooaklna aa lw analm ot a.tut. 

la adcU.14• to t.119 ....... --!A nc-e 1. 

!be ft'9r rlllp ot _.... a., ln otlla ...a., 

1n all nc-- ~~ 14dleal ta ,... alll 

~ oboalta. • • 

Clala 14, U. 1 • Cawl lltm Je1Mf1S• olda• an4 Sl1..n • Clda U • • 

Cldll 20, Um 1 • C.wl 11\Jae in-ttac ell.la• Ull twt • Clda 19 • • 

Cla!a M- • • Camel. 

3,. - • 

• tbl add • • 

Olda 4P • • 

'2-- • • c...i. 

43- - • 4AI- • • 

.... 

'l'h• .....i ....-.. to the .,..snea,s. .. sa "..,_.. to tm ........ 

00 ...... u4 Ol'iU.1-. 

!be ...... !a the el.aim 13, 20, ml 40 ant• thl Pll*POH ot elt-t•Unc 

Id.Dor ubSpltS.. 

1¢or~FIDD~TIAU 
"'" - .... 

REF ID:A39619 

l¢ot~FIDENTIAU .e 

Wlth -u. .-.Uat.loa ot Clam J4, ''' 411 421 431 and 44, t.119 ... 

oonWu m]I' old.ml abeldT ali-4 • -14 to be allolrabl.8. 

ReepeoUullr, 

nLt.I&M I'. PRDDllll all! 

llAB B. 1'tOll&ft 1 .lppl!oaat8 

IGO~JFIDE~HIALJ
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6609** 

DENNIS PATTON , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. ALVIN W. KELLER, Secretary, N.C. Department of Correction; VANESA GILBERT, Captain, Henderson County Jail , Respondent s - Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville
. Martin K. Reidinger , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cv - 00280

- MR )

Submitted : September 29, 2011 Decided: October 5, 2011

Before KING, G REGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Dennis Patton, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Carla Hollis, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Dennis Patton seeks to appeal the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U. S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (A) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “ a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. ” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies
t his standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. a t 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Patton has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conte ntions are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSE D
# C_2014097EN.01000801.xml

| 2.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 97/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 97/8

---

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations (1):

1

0,25 % on 1 April 2014

Euro exchange rates (2)

2

1 April 2014

(2014/C 97/03)

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3790 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 142,53 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4655 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82920 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9002 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2178 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2270 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,449 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,79 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1779 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4654 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9659 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4929 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5241 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6971 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5903 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7380 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 460,04 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6168 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5592 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6485 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 595,18 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5039 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,744 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,4420 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,632 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1338 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0263 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,6950 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3790

JPY

Japanese yen

142,53

DKK

Danish krone

7,4655

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82920

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9002

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2178

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2270

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,449

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,79

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1779

RON

Romanian leu

4,4654

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9659

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4929

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5241

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6971

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5903

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7380

KRW

South Korean won

1 460,04

ZAR

South African rand

14,6168

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5592

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6485

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 595,18

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5039

PHP

Philippine peso

61,744

RUB

Russian rouble

48,4420

THB

Thai baht

44,632

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1338

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0263

INR

Indian rupee

82,6950

---

(1)  Rate applied to the most recent operation carried out before the indicated day. In the case of a variable rate tender, the interest rate is the marginal rate.

1

(2)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

2

Source

---
OSWER/OSRTI Washington, DC 20460



## N ATIONAL 

## P RIORITIES 

## L IST 

## (NPL)

***Proposed Site *** October 2010 

### WASHINGTON COUNTY LE AD DISTRICT

– FURNACE CREEK Cale do n ia
, Missouri

Washington County

 **Site Location :** 
The Washington County Lead District

– Furnace Creek (Furnace Creek) s ite is located in a he avily mined region of eastern Missouri known as the Washington County Lead District. The site includes residential areas within and around the towns of Caledonia, Irondale, Belgrade, and Hopewell

. The Furnace Creek site includes contamination located wit hin a 175 square mile area in the southeastern portion of Washington County, Missouri.

 **Site History:** The Washington County Lead District is part of Missouri’s Old Lead Belt, where lead mining has occurred for hundreds of years. The Old Lead Belt provided approximately 80 percent of the lead produced in the United States. A dditionally, this area is part of the barite mineralization district of Missouri. After the Civil War, numerous small barite mines operated in Washington County, which was the world’s leading producer of barite before declining in the 1980s. Many of the later large mining operations reworked lands that were previously hand mined for galena (mineral source of lead) or barite.

Wa shington County has hosted more than 1,000 lead and bari te mining, milling, or smelting sites

.

 **Site Contamination/Contaminants:** The Furnace Creek site includes source piles, tailing ponds and residences with elevated levels of lead throughout the area. The piles primarily consist of overburden and tailings from mineral mining and processing. Heavy metal soil contamination is present at elevated concentrations at more than 400 residential properties. To date , there are more than 1 6 private residential wells with lead contamination.

 **Potential Impacts on Surrounding Community/Environment**  **:**
The Furnace Creek site includes e levated levels of heavy metals found during sampling conducted in 2009. Additionally,

residen tial yards, ground water, and surface water have various elevated levels of heavy metals.

 **Response Activities (to date):**

EPA response activities include providing bottled water to residences and excavation of more than 150 residential yards in

the Furnace Creek area.

 **Need for NPL Listing:**

The S tate of Missouri referred th e site to EPA

. Oth er federal and state cleanup programs were evaluated , but were not
viable at this time

.

[The description of the site (release) is based on information available at the time the site was evaluated with the HRS. The description may change as additional information is gathered on the sources and extent of contamination.]

For more information about the hazardous substances identified in this narrative summary, including general information regarding the effects of exposure to these substances on human health, please see the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) ToxFAQs. ATSDR ToxFAQs ca n be found on the Internet

at http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxfaq.html or by telephone at 1

- 888

- 42

- ATSDR or 1

- 888

- 422

- 8737.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000

18 12 06 00 08/15 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
! 

A-uNCTIONAL 

8RIG7.ll. Tl LlMAN 

t! 

- -----

GECRElJ 

O/lGANISATION OF G.C.1-1.Q. 

J# JDL]i J§'§F l~/"f'ic v, 1cr6·1 

DI RECTO~ 

SIR EDWARD TJ?AVIS 

ED. 3.3(h) (2) 

PL86-36/50 USC 3605 

. 

G.01.2 

cX/.-118/T A 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-05-2014 pursuant 

o E.O. 13526 

' -

RPO '/14. 

------ -----
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00082-CR

CHRISTOPHER WAYNE MORRISS,

Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 89th District Court

of Wichita County (61,511-C)

September 9, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in one of the trial court’s judgments. We affirm the trial court’s judgment on 

count 1. We modify the judgment on count 6 to (1) delete and replace “Indecency w/

Child Sexual Contact” with “Indecency w/ Child Exposure” and (2) delete and 

replace “2nd Degree Felony” with “3rd Degree Felony.” We affirm the judgment on 

count 6 as modified.
SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ENACTED UNDER**

**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period endingMarch 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Carlene Lloyd, Vice President of Finance of the Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted under§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company as of March 31, 2006 (the end of the period covered by the Report). 

Date: May 15, 2006
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

869 

KA 13-01994 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., SMITH, LINDLEY, TROUTMAN, AND SCUDDER, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JOHN E. SABINS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 4.) 

 

CARA A. WALDMAN, FAIRPORT, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

BROOKS T. BAKER, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATH (JOHN C. TUNNEY OF COUNSEL),

FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Steuben County Court (Joseph W.

Latham, J.), rendered June 25, 2013. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a forged

instrument in the second degree. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by defendant on August 29, 2016, and by the attorneys for the

parties on August 9 and 15, 2016,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

upon stipulation.

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
1 EPA Region 9 SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST

To evaluate compliance with 40 CFR 51, Appendix V

Submittal Date August 7, 2014

District Name Feather River

Date Reviewed August 25 , 2014

EPA Reviewer Arnold Lazarus Key:

C = Complete

I = Incomplete

N/A = Not Applicable To Rule

O = Material Missing

N/S = None Submitted

RULE #: 2.0

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee C

(b) Evidence of adoption C

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt C

(d1) Copy of actual rule/plan C

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross

- out C

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements C

(f) Copy of public notice C

(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice C

(h) Public comments & agency response C

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified C

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified C

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact C

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration C

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements C

(h) Compliance/enforcement strategies C

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C
Exhibit 32.1

    Section 906 Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Zarlink Semiconductor Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick J. Brockett, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

                        Date: October 28, 2004

                                           /s/ PATRICK J. BROCKETT
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patrick J. Brockett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>



                               POWER OF ATTORNEY



         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Lawrence E. Kreider and Joram C. Salig or any of them, each acting alone, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution,
for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection
with the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (the "Form 10-K") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of
the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents
in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying
and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,
or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this
18th day of February, 1997.



                                                     /s/ Donald G. Drapkin
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     DONALD G. DRAPKIN