alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Connecticu t Departmen t o f

ENERG Y & ENVIRONMENTA L PROTECTIO N 7 9 El m Stree t • Hartford , C T 06106-512 7 www.ct.gov/dee p Affirmativ e Action/Equa l Opportunit y Employe r

Januar y 25,201 3 Davi d B . Conroy , Chie f Ai r Program s Branch Unite d States Environmenta l Protectio n Agency Region 1 5 Pos t Offic e Squar

e - Suit e 10 0 Mai l Cod e OEP05-0

2 Boston , M A 02109-391 2 Re: Negative DeclarationforHospital Medical Infectious Waste Incinerators - 40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ce: Connecticut Dea r Mr . Conroy : Th e Connecticu

t Departmen

t o f Energ y an d Environmenta

l Protectio n (DEEP) hereb y submits anegative declaratio n pursuan

t to th e Emissio n Guideline s fo r Hospital/Medical/Infectiou s Wast e Incinerator s Constructe d o

n o r Befor e Jun e 20 , 1996 , 4

0 CF R Par t 60 , Subpar

t Ce . A s o f

today , DEEP' s informatio n indicate s tha

t n o Hospital/Medical/Infectiou s Wast e Incinerator

(HMIWI ) i s operatin g i n the Stat e o f Connecticut . Unti l recently , asingle HMIW I uni t di d operat

e i n th e state , owned b y Bristol-Myer s Squib b Compan

y an d located i n Wallingford , Connecticut . Tha t uni t wa s recently shu

t down , an d th e permi t wa s revoked , a s follows : • Th e HMIW I uni t

ha s no t bee n i n operatio n since July 201 2 an d rendere d inoperable on or

aroun d Septembe r 10 , 2012 . A n inspectio n repor t (attached ) issue d by DEE

P on Septembe

r 28 , 201 2 confirm s tha

t th e Ecolaire Environmenta l Product s 1000TE

S Incinerato r

ha s bee n rendere d inoperable an

d tha t th e sourc e n o longe r operate s auni t

subject t o 4 0 CF R Par t 60 , Subpar

t Ce . • Permit

Numbe r 189-0207-T

V fo r th e premise s a

t Bristol-Myer s Squib

b Company , 5 Researc

h Parkway , Wallingford , C T ha s bee n revoked . Th

e revocatio n notice , date

d Decembe

r 27 , 2012 , i s I f DEE P discovers a

n operatin g HMIW I uni t

i n th e stat e tha t i s subjec t

to 4 0 CF R Par t 60 , Subpar

t C e o r Ec , w e wil l infor myo u an

d wor k to addres s an

y outstanding obligations . I f yo u hav e an y questions , please d o no t hesitat e t o ge t i n touch wit h Richar

d A . Piroll i o f

m y staf f a t (860 ) 424-3450 . attached .

Sincerely , Anne R . Gobin , Chie f Burea u o f Ai r Managemen

t cc : Patrick

Bird , EP A Regio n 1 (vi aelectroni c mail )
----

**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**Company**
**Form 10-Q**

|   | (1) | the                Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | information                contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                    David A. Martin                        |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David                    A. Martin                            |
|   | Vice                    President and Controller              |
|   | Principal                  Financial                  Officer |
. 

·' 

REF ID:A67557 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

• 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

MEIOBABDUM BE CIPBEi DIYICE ... 1381 SEO?IOHALIZ!D ftPE. 

1. Let the sections be chaDDeled oa both obftrse and 

reverse fac;es. 

s 

2. AslUJD1ng equal-width sections oE 5-chaanels, w1tb 

t1Te sections comprising a set, the n.uaber ot poaatble U'.l'&Qgeaents o£ aect.1.oaa totaling SO cli.fferent alphabet atrips ta 

10 x 8 x 6 x 4 x 2 • ~. fith six aectiolla (60 alphabets) 

the total muaber ls '6,080 arrangaen.ts. 

3. Unequal. width aecUODS mq also be Wied 1n the uae 

UDner.. With S •ect1ons of 31 4,, 5. 6 and 7 chalmels, the 

.. 

number of possible arrangement.f/alao 3840. With aeven oect1ona 

11 2, 3, 41 S1 6, 7 channels 1n width,. the ma'bar ot paaalbl• 

arrang•enta la 6.45 1120. 

Willi•• F. Pried.man 

liq 8, 1936. 

· lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§ 

'
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         121,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,621,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                   536,100
<INVENTORY>                                    712,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,110,100
<PP&E>                                       2,456,600
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,113,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,042,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,242,600
<BONDS>                                        954,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       412,200
<OTHER-SE>                                     433,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,042,700
<SALES>                                      6,817,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,850,800
<CGS>                                        4,146,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,146,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                86,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                34,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             123,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                171,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    32,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            138,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   138,400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
! ...; REF ID:A58142 

IOPSECRET 

SUBJECT• Declassification of Document 

TOa CSS:: FROM: AG DATEa 20 March 57 Comment No. 2 

Dr. Stuky 

Will you please give me your comments as to whether or not this document 

can be downgraded to Sa::RET. 

Incl 

n/c 

TO: AG 

/1ttef131(A/ 

PAUL S. WILIARD 

Colonel A<I; 

Adjutant General 

FROM: H. J. Stukey DATE: 2 6 MAR 1957 COMMENT NO. 3 

lJJStukey/ooc/6o426/r . 

I consider that the document inclosed With Comment No. 1 should retain the 

classification TOP SECRET since it identifies individuaJ.s so closel.y With 

success on.a particular problem. I should, however, be Willing to accept 

PROD' s and .ePf!t judgement if they concur in reconmend.ing downgr"ding to SECREr. 

· OftlS~ 

Incl 

n/c 

Office of 

s Security Doctrine 

DECLASSIFY UPON REMOVA'V 

OF INCLOSURES 

~ TOP SS';RET CONTROL NO. 57-AG-H.1 

COPY I OF 5 COPIES 

PAGE 4 OF ...LJ./ PAGES 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 08-14-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

TOP SECRET
### RUNOWALLMAN 

## & ROBBINS LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAIN MARKET SQUARE CENTER 151 NORTH DELAWARE STREET, SUITE 520 ROBERT W. RUND INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46204-2535 FOUNDED IN 1984 AS O. MICHAEL WALLMAN ABBOTT,. RUND, SMALL & <\3EORGI;S JEFFREY L. ROBBINS RUND & WUNSCH LLP(t991-2004)

E-MAIL: mailbox@rundlaw.com TELEPblONE: (317) 639-2224 WEB: WWW.rundlaw.com FAX:**(~:17) e36~8~~~1**  March 

### 17,2010

..**!2:~~'** 

### r.:aThe Honorable Ray LaHood United States Department ofTransportation 

### 1200 New Jersey Avenue, 

### SE WMl"!ingto}l, DC; 

### 20590
Dear Secretary LaHood:
OnbehalfofRund Wallman 

### & Robbins LLP, lam writing to expressour strong support for the application ofDeltaAir Lines for new nonstop service between Detroit and Haneda.

,**..Approv~1.ofPelta)** ,new service would be amajor benefit for OUT region,**wher~mflP.yo.cp.morations** have strong trade and market presence with Japan. There are.f.llh:po§t2$PJapanese companies located in Indiana and hundreds more whose blu;irtessacttvitjes rely 011 access to Japan and its market. The growth ofour business ties 

### With Japan has created demand for increased capacity to Tokyo. Indiana corporate representatives look to the convenience offlying into Tokyo's downtown Haneda.airport

.. Indianapolis does notofferintemational serviceto Asia, and many ofour busiu<:)ss travelers use Oetroi.t as their hub when flying to Japan. Detroit is a proven and successful gateway to Asia and is an airport that can support trans-pacific routes. This summer Delta is adding new service to Seoul and Hong Kong, fulfilling the**.~** ..**~. "~'~'-~**  ..**iC"~OB1mi~~t RGltamad€~t~.Dl'\\Ltolllake,iHheair1jne?$sateway.toAsia**  ..**Th~** ...... .

. additiondfHittiedaas'a destination 

### isia nafural'fit that woulddearlybenefifotir\

region.
Thank you for consideration ofthis request.
Sincere1Y1 ,-\",;J
• REF ID--: A66881 • 

..,,, 

-- -----~ -- ----------------------- --- ·;;;: 
REF ID:A66881 • 

-------------------------------------
##### 



EXHIBIT 12 (b) METRIS COMPANIES INC.
COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS
(DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Year Ended December 31,2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    
    2001
    
    
    2000Earnings: (1)Earnings (loss) before income taxes, and cumulative effect of
accounting change
    
    $
    33,745
    
    
    $
    (217,265
    )
    
    $
    283
    
    
    $
    287,915
    
    
    $
    303,723Fixed charges
    
    
    63,729
    
    
    
    83,152
    
    
    
    111,446
    
    
    
    173,553
    
    
    
    139,029Earnings, for computation purposes
    
    
    97,474
    
    
    
    (134,113
    )
    
    
    111,729
    
    
    
    461,468
    
    
    
    442,752Preferred dividend requirement
    
    $
    43,817
    
    
    $
    40,086
    
    
    $
    38,009
    
    
    $
    34,770
    
    
    $
    31,622Ratio of earnings before tax expense to income before extraordinary items and
cumulative effect of accounting changes
    
    
    1.47
    
    
    
    1.47
    
    
    
    (0.18
    )
    
    
    1.65
    
    
    
    1.63Preferred dividends (2)
    
    $
    64,437
    
    
    $
    58,949
    
    
    $
    (6,791
    )
    
    $
    57,471
    
    
    $
    51,502Fixed Charges: (1)Interest on indebtedness, and amortization of
debt expense
    
    
    60,441
    
    
    
    74,421
    
    
    
    103,516
    
    
    
    166,277
    
    
    
    133,006Interest factor of rental expense
    
    
    3,288
    
    
    
    8,730
    
    
    
    7,930
    
    
    
    7,276
    
    
    
    6,023Total Fixed Charges
    
    
    63,729
    
    
    
    83,152
    
    
    
    111,446
    
    
    
    173,553
    
    
    
    139,029Total fixed charges and preferred dividends
    
    
    128,166
    
    
    
    142,101
    
    
    
    104,655
    
    
    
    231,024
    
    
    
    190,531Total available earnings (loss)
    
    $
    161,911
    
    
    $
    (75,164
    )
    
    $
    104,938
    
    
    $
    518,939
    
    
    $
    494,254Ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges and preferred dividends
    
    
    0.76
    
    
    
    (0.94
    )
    
    
    1.07
    
    
    
    2.00
    
    
    
    2.32Deficiency
    
    $
    30,693
    
    
    $
    276,215
   (1)
    
    As defined in Item 503(d) of Regulation S-K.(2)
    
    Preferred dividends represent the pretax earnings that would have been
required to cover such dividend requirement.
• 

• 

• 

i '-- - . - ---------

REF ID:A42820 

Washington (DC) Post, August 8, 1953 

Ralf lUIG Pi.lots Russian 

Arms Flow to China I 

Goes On After Truce: I 

HONGKONG, Aug. 7 (NYHT.). Soviet supply build-up lo China 

The Soviet Union will continue by rail or by sea . 

a steady flow of military and .The B:ed Chinese air .force 1 

Leclmical assistance tu Commu- will be.given a new poten~1~l by 

nist China in spite oft.he Ko- act1vat10n of an. add1t1onal 

rea11 truce. according to infor- complex of air~elds in south and 

mation reaching Western intel- ~outhwest . Chma. MlG forces 

ligence sources. 111 the base complex south of 

It can now be disclosed that Shanghai, as at Nin po and HangSovieL citizens, including non- kow, have been .reinforced. BeOriental pilots. constituted at tween Shanghai and Canton 

one juncture close to 50 percent there n_O\'.' are about 250 MIGs, 

of the Communist air force. at a m1111mum. 

Radio interce2ts,..~ of. .~il9Ho- The Chinese have ac~ivated, 

gQJ!uW __ ~!1~'...~~i1,li_9J}~ __ J:1 ... !J.1e '.In 11nportant group of airfields 

Yalu1 River battle area estab- m the southwest, near French : lisi1e-d· ·tiiar-sovrct~rSifoilel rn·do-China. 

15rc_1:e .• a,cJ,Lv£fr--f.1!g"}tffrp-' --- · A base south or Peking re- l Russian dialects vary consid- ~ently received a force of stra1 

crably, so that a catalogue was tegic bombers-the Soviet ver- made indicating what parts of s.ion of the American B·29 Sup1 

Lhc Soviet Union various MIG erfortresses. The presence in 

pilots hailed from. central China of Soviet-styled' 

.Russians also served as tank jet bombers also has been re- 1

' 

clrivers. artillery officers and in ported.· 

anti-aircraft battalions. Orcli- The Russians also have been 

nary ground troops also in- taking an increasing number of 

eluded. pcrso.ns bori.1 and edu· Chinese candidates into their· 

catcd 111 Soviet ternt.ory. . naval training centers at Portj 

I

I _Actuall~, the Sov1~t Un_1on Arthur and Dai_ren. It has been ~~eps tram_cd on S?v1et so!!} reported persistently that a: krnd or. fo1c.1~n legion ?f ~all- dozen Soviet submarines have' o~s nauon.ahlles. rncluding for- been turned over to Red Cliina ~ c1bly retarned German,. Yugo- lt is known that Chine ·e ai:e, ~lav and .Japanese prisoners . . ~. 1 taken in World War Jl. bemg trained iis submar~ners, 

They are shock troops which anr! th~t a n~l]1be~: .or Ch1n?~e, the Russians can send to any par ts. mcludmg 'l s1~1gtao. are place where it suits them to c'.lpable now of hand!rng subma-

. pretend that ii co.nfiict is a civil nne traffic. · .. war. The German troops, for It has .hcen estab!1shed that 

example. would come in handy the Russians have rn the Far 

if the Russians should decide East alone seven tunes as many 

to initiate a Korea-type civit submarines as were mamied by war between East and West Adolph Hitler's Germany when 

Germany. the Nazis were launching deadly 

There has been no drop since undersea altacks in World 

the truce in the tempo of the War IL
exv10w1





EXHIBIT 10.1




EXTENSION OF CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT



American Express Company, a New York corporation having offices at American Express Tower, World
Financial Center, 200 Vesey Street, New York, New York 10285, and Theodore J. Leonsis hereby agree
to extend up through and including July 18, 2012 the terms of the consulting services agreement
(“Agreement”) entered into by the parties on July 19, 2010. By signing this extension agreement,
the parties are extending the Agreement effective July 19, 2011 and as if the Agreement had not
expired but rather had continuously remained in effect. The terms of this extension, including the
payment terms, shall be the same as set forth in the Agreement.
The parties may sign this extension in counterparts, and each signed counterpart shall be deemed an original.





	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY	 	THEODORE J. LEONSIS
	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Kenneth I. Chenault
	 	By:
	 	/s/ Theodore J. Leonsis
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Kenneth I. Chenault
	 	 
	 	Name: Theodore J. Leonsis
	 

	 	Title: Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Date:	 	August 1, 2011
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:	 	August 1, 2011
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of vFinance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Sheila C. Reinken,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/ Sheila C. Reinken
-----------------------
Sheila C. Reinken
Chief Financial Officer
March 31, 2005
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Nos.33-74748 and 33-80500) of Uniroyal Technology  Corporation on Form S-3, the
Registration  Statements  (Nos.  33-73944,  33-74746,  33-92256 and 33-97250) of
Uniroyal Technology  Corporation on Form S-8, and the Registration  Statement of
Uniroyal  Technology  Corporation  on Form S-8 filed on December 27, 1996 of our
reports dated  December 20, 1996 (except for the second  paragraph of Note 15 as
to which the date is January 3, 1997),  appearing  in the Annual  Report on Form
10K/A of Uniroyal Technology Corporation for the year ended September 29, 1996.


/S/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
-------------------------
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Tampa, Florida
January 20, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000352447
<NAME>                        Northwest Gold, Inc.

<S>                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  AUG-31-2000
<CASH>                        11,900
<SECURITIES>                   4,100
<RECEIVABLES>                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                       0
<INVENTORY>                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              16,000
<PP&E>                        29,000
<DEPRECIATION>                29,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                17,900
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>          4,400
<BONDS>                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>              0
<PREFERRED>                        0
<COMMON>                       7,800
<OTHER-SE>                     5,600
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  13,500
<SALES>                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 100
<CGS>                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>               3,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                    0
<INCOME-TAX>                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (3,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                    0
<CHANGES>                          0
<NET-INCOME>                  (3,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                      0



</TABLE>
.. 

MUST REMAIN WITH ATIACHED PAPERS 

NUMBER EACH MEMO OR REPLY IN LEFT BORDER, PLACE NAME, RANK AND 

TELEPHONE NUMBER BOTTOM OF EACH ACTION DRAW LINE UNDER EACH ACTION 

ENlER RLE CLASSIFICATION ADJUTANT -----

TO FROM DATE SUBJECT Draft of Manuscript "The Effects of World 

AS-2} 

been 

f eeli 

indiv 

the B 

5 Indl 

7 Mar 4 War- II on the Security of U.S. Naval COJ:J1:1uni-

" 

ce to the attached buakslip·from AS-23, the. 

¥-- 1nterest1-ng and well constructed. 'If suf r 

ailable, this Agency coul~ use a total- or· 

at the classification of TICOM material has 

at ASA for sone tine. It had been the 

TICOM material was TOP SECRET, except such 

ere specifically excepted by agree~ent between 

eervices. Recently this matter bas been a 

by USCICC, the result or which was an agreer policy which has been forwarded to the 

This statement was as follows: it is proposed tish and U. s. servi-0es be permitted to re-' 

a own 1scret1on suah TICOM material as pertains to 

1cat1o security only." 

l B kslip oa AS 23 

to AS-14 

WILLIAM P. Flt.1..1:1.Loll".i.n, 

Director of 

Communications Research 

2 B kslip 23 Ext 21-5 

to AS-70 

3 Ca rier s eet fr m AS-80 

to AS-20, dtd 6 eb 47 

4 K o for hief, ecur1ty Div. 

A , fro Comdr. Weeks, 

dt 21 Ja 4I 

5 Wr te-Up n 'The Effects 

ot World ar II n the 

Se • of U s. Nav 1 Comm. 

'WIHWI F- No. 107I PAGE NO. --- 16 Nw e 111taO LIFT HERE USE OTHER SIDE 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 04-24-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352
Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm









Forticell
      Bioscience, Inc.


New
      York,
      New York




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
      Form
      S-8 (No. 333-80799) of Forticell Bioscience, Inc. of our report dated March
      31,
      2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this
      Form 10-KSB. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the
      Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.







/s/
      BDO
      Seidman, LLP


BDO
      Seidman, LLP





New
      York,
      New York


March
      31,
      2008
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges McClanahan , * Haley and Senior Judge Willis

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL LAM MEMORANDUM OPINION **
v. Record No. 0655

- 11

- 4 PER CURIAM AUGUST 16, 2011 TOWN OF LURARY LAW ENFORCEMENT AND

VIRGINIA MUNICIPAL GROUP SELF

- INSURANCE ASSOCIATION

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS ’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION (Arthur L. Goff; Bushey, Cave & Goff, on brief), for appellant. ( William S. Sands, Jr.; Duncan & Hopkins, P.C., on brief), for appellees.

Christopher Michael Lam ap peals a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Commission. He asserts the commission erred in (1) affirming the decision of the deputy commissioner that he abandoned his claim for a shoulder injury; (2) affirming the decision of the deputy commissioner tha t his claim was barred by the statute of limitations; (3) addressing the
factual issue of causation because the decision that the claim had been time

- barred was factual and dispositive, and the adjudication of the issue of causation was gratuitous and unne cessary; (4) addressing the factual issue of causation without providing notice to him; and (5) concluding there was no persuasive evidence he suffered a left shoulder injury in the accident. We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and fi nd that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See Lam v.

* Justice McClanahan participated in the decision of th is case prior to her investiture as a Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia

** Pursuant to Code § 17.1

- 413, this opinion is not designated for publication.- 2

- Town of Luray Law Enforcement , VWC File No. 234

- 59

- 44 (Mar. 2, 2011). We dispense with oral argument and summarily a ffirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
See Code § 17.1

- 403; Rule 5A:27.
Affirmed.