alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

942 

CAF 15-00684 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF OMIA M., DE’KARI M., ARIEL M., 

AND DWAYNE M. 

----------------------------------------------- MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ERIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT; 

 

TYKIA B., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

EVELYNE A. O’SULLIVAN, EAST AMHERST, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

ELISABETH M. COLUCCI, BUFFALO, FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

DEAN S. PULEO, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILDREN, BUFFALO. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Sharon M.

LoVallo, J.), entered January 26, 2015 in a proceeding pursuant to

Social Services Law § 384-b. The order denied respondent’s motion to

vacate an order approving respondent’s surrender of her parental

rights. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order denying her

motion pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) to vacate an order approving her

conditional judicial surrender of parental rights with respect to her

five children (see Social Services Law § 383-c [3] [a], [b]). The

mother’s motion was based solely upon Family Court’s inherent power to

open its prior orders or judgments in the interest of justice (see

generally Oneida Natl. Bank & Trust Co. of Cent. N.Y. v Unczur, 37

AD2d 480, 483). Thus, the mother’s contention that she did not

knowingly enter into the surrender of her parental rights is raised

for the first time on appeal and therefore is not preserved for our

review (see generally Matter of Arkadian S. [Crystal S.], 130 AD3d

1457, 1458, lv dismissed 26 NY3d 995). In any event, that contention

is without merit. It is well settled that, in the absence of “fraud,

duress or coercion in the execution or inducement of a surrender[, n]o

action or proceeding may be maintained by the surrendering parent

. . . to revoke or annul such surrender” (§ 383-c [6] [d]). Here, the

mother failed to allege fraud, duress or coercion as a basis for

vacatur (see Matter of Sabrina H., 245 AD2d 1134, 1135). Moreover,

the record establishes that the court’s voir dire of the mother

substantially complied with the requirements of Social Services Law 

§ 383-c (3) (b) (see Matter of Naquan L.G. [Carolyn C.], 140 AD3d 757, 
-2- 942 

CAF 15-00684 

760). 

Entered: November 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit21.1**

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**
| Name of Subsidiary             | ** ** | **Place of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
|                           |       |                       |
| Overland Storage (Europe) Ltd. |       | United Kingdom             |
|                           |       |                       |
| Overland Storage SARL          |       | France                     |
|                           |       |                       |
| Overland Storage GmbH          |       | Germany                    |
|                           |       |                       |
| Zetta Systems, Inc.            |       | Washington                 |

                      

----
Order entered December 23, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01060
- CV LAZO TECHNOLOGIES, I NC., ET AL., Appellant s V. HEWLETT
- PACKARD COMPANY, ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 Dal las County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 12
- 06786
- D 

### O RDER
We GRANT the December 10, 2014 motion of Walter Steimel, Jr. with the law firm of Loeb & Loeb LLP to withdraw as counsel for appellants. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to substitute Perry Co ckerell with the law firm of Ankerson, Hauder & Bezney, P.C. as counsel for appellants.
We GRANT appellants’ December 18, 2014 motion for lea ve to file an amended brief. Appellants shall file an amended brief by DECEMBER 31, 2014 . Appellees’ brief will b e due THIRTY DAYS after appellants’ amended brief is filed.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7249

JAMES SOLOMON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

NURSE WILLIAMS; LT. GREEN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

FRANK L. PERRY; GEORGE T. SOLOMON; DR. PAULA SMITH; MS. 

LYNCH; VINCENT RAMSEY; MR. FORREST; JOHN DOES, 1-100; JANE 

DOES, 1-100,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,

Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03028-D)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Solomon, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, 

Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 
2

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

James Solomon appeals the district court’s order granting 

summary judgment to the Defendants in Solomon’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

(2012) action. We have reviewed the record on appeal and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons 

stated by the district court. Solomon v. Williams, No. 5:15-ct03028-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 22, 2016). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 17, 2016

p1110

Order 

Clerk

November 17, 2016

153848

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 153848

COA: 324893

Ionia CC: 2013-015962-FC

STEVEN BRADLEY MACKENZIE,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 26, 2016 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals addressing the defendant’s claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel with 

regard to counsel’s handling of the withdrawal of the defendant’s nolo contendere plea, 

pursuant to MCR 6.310(B)(2). We REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals, which 

shall retain jurisdiction while remanding the case to the Ionia Circuit Court to conduct an 

evidentiary hearing pursuant to People v Ginther, 390 Mich 436 (1973). At the 

conclusion of the hearing, the circuit court shall then forward the record and its findings 

to the Court of Appeals, which shall address the issues presented by the defendant. 

In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the remaining questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
GQ~Ml:1EN'i1±Ab 

NSA OPERATIONS ORDER 

NUMBER 114 (Change 1) 

MATIONPJ.... SECUR!Tt AGENCY 

Washington 25, D. c. 27 July 55 

CAMCELLED WEEN CH.ANGE H.AS BEEN ENTERED IN BASIC OPERATiot'1S ORDER 

Section IV, paragraph 9: .Add SSR, CINCPAC, SSO, USARPAC, CINCPACFLT, 

and SSO, PACAF as end-product recipients. 

BY COMMAND OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL CANINE: 

"-OFFICIAL: 

} __,..... /( , /J /l1 I l." I' r.1u1u~. -t 

M. T. CARDIN.AL 

Major WAC 

.Actg Asst Adj Gen 

DISTRIBUTION 

Special 

I 

I 

I 

ALFRED R. MARCY 

Colonel, US A"CTJ.IY' 

Deputy Director 

Production 

HJOOwLE lfIA OOM!lfi' eff1\flfffiLS 

CONFIDENTIAL 

eclassifi ed and a roved for r lease b NSA on 1-1 -2014 ursuantto E .0. 135
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Health Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan B. Miller, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and to the best of my knowledge, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of, and for the period covered by, the Report. 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Universal Health Services, Inc. and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2014379EN.01000101.xml

| 25.10.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 379/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 379/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 October 2014

2014/C 379/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,2659 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,64 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4452 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,78870 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1881 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2060 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3400 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,695 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 308,65 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,2235 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4230 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8332 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4396 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4191 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 9,8206 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6116 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6158 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 338,21 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 13,8878 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 7,7426 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6730 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 286,41 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1496 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 56,690 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 53,1330 |
| THB | Thai baht | 41,025 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1541 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,1406 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 77,4541 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,2659

JPY

Japanese yen

136,64

DKK

Danish krone

7,4452

GBP

Pound sterling

0,78870

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1881

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2060

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3400

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,695

HUF

Hungarian forint

308,65

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,2235

RON

Romanian leu

4,4230

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8332

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4396

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4191

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

9,8206

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6116

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6158

KRW

South Korean won

1 338,21

ZAR

South African rand

13,8878

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

7,7426

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6730

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 286,41

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1496

PHP

Philippine peso

56,690

RUB

Russian rouble

53,1330

THB

Thai baht

41,025

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1541

MXN

Mexican peso

17,1406

INR

Indian rupee

77,4541

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM
NETRIX CORPORATION'S FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

<S>                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                           5,930
<SECURITIES>                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                    9,697
<ALLOWANCES>                     2,902
<INVENTORY>                      4,304
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                20,462
<PP&E>                           14,519
<DEPRECIATION>                   (9,959)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                   95,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            12,442
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>            0
<PREFERRED>                      0
<COMMON>                         1,463
<OTHER-SE>                       80,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>     95,253
<SALES>                         31,345
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                31,345
<CGS>                           16,535
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   16,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                39,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>               (178)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (24,770)
<INCOME-TAX>                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (24,770)
<DISCONTINUED>                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                  0
<CHANGES>                        0
<NET-INCOME>                     (24,770)
<EPS-BASIC>                    (2.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                    (2.17)















</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 46 (Tuesday, March 10, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12642]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05456]



[[Page 12642]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Cancer Institute Special Emphasis Panel, March 24, 2015 01:00 p.m. to 
March 24, 2015, 05:00 p.m., National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 
Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850 which was published in the 
Federal Register on February 03, 2015, 80FR5767.
    The meeting notice is amended to change the title from NCI/R01/U54 
Review to NCI P01/R01/U54 Review. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: March 4, 2015.
Melanie J. Gray,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-05456 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Triumph Group, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard C. Ill, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By:

/s/ RICHARD C. ILLRichard C. Ill Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)May 14, 2010


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Triumph Group, Inc. and will be retained by Triumph Group, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14972-14973]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06457]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1967]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 58 Under Alternative Site 
Framework; Bangor, Maine

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of 
zones;
    Whereas, the City of Bangor, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 58, 
submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-67-2014, docketed 
09-23-2014) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a service 
area of the Counties of Hancock, Penobscot, Piscataquis, Waldo and 
Washington, Maine, within and adjacent to the Bangor Customs and Border 
Protection port of entry, and FTZ 58's existing Site 1 would be 
categorized as a magnet site;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (79 FR 58318, 09-29-2014) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and 
the Board's regulations are satisfied;
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 58 under the ASF is approved, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.13, and to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the 
zone.


[[Page 14973]]


    Signed at Washington, DC, this March 12, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

    Attest:
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06457 Filed 3-19-15; 08:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
REF ID:A39514 

• • IN REP!.. Y REFER TO WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

Subject: Cryptographic Apperatus 

December 10, 193?. 

To: 

Improvements in Converter ~:I-134-Tl 

Patent Application, Ser. No. 159 1383. 

D:ir. ~;;illiam F. Friedman, 

Cryptanalyst, 

TJar Plans and Training Di vision, 

Office of the Chief Signal Officer. 

1. This will report the first ection of the Patent Office 

in the above case. Copy is sent hereuith for your files of the EXaminer's letter of December 3, 193?, together with printed copies of 

the cited reference patents. 

2. The main objection of the Examiner is directed to clearness 

of disclosure• Admittedly, the references are not regarded by the Examiner as even having sufficient importance to limit the scope of the 

claims. 

3. Your comments and suggestions are re;uested in due course 

to assist in the preparation of an appropriate reply to the official 

letter, bearing in mind that the time for tiling the response Will 

expire June 3, 1938. 

Encl. 

..~.: . - .!?-~":.\ .. . ::.. 

:,:_:~ .. ~f=::::r;;;fj'..:~?. ·.~ 

Charles A· Roue, 

Patents Section, Signal Corps 

pproved for Release by NSAon 09-30-2013 pursuant to E.O. 

13526 
REF ID:A39514 

• 

Cl"yptOf'rsphlc Appiratua 

Impro'1ementa in Conerter M-1.34-fi 

Patent Appllcatloa. Ser. 11o. 115?,sms. 

'Mr. ~;11Ua• 11'• J'ri..._•, crn,a.nalpt, 

wer Plu• aid Tralnbg D1Y1a1oa. 

Of't'ic• ot t'be Q.1et stpal Otn.eer. 

DeoeMV 10, lnf • 

1. '1'b1a •111 rP-por' the t1rat eot1oa ot the Patent Ottice 

1a the aboTe case. CoJl;r 1• aeat herewith 'for your tiles ot the :r.zua1ner' a le'tel' of TJ .. c9111bP.r S, ig37, togetber with prtntnd copies of 

the c1t~4 1'9terence pet~nta. 

2. '!'he •in objection ot the F.xamlaer la directed to cleerne• 

of dlaoloaua. A411i'te41J', the 1'9'terence• an not :regarded bt the t:s-

•iner a• ewa J11rf1ng auf'fioient 111portaBO• to 11111t the aeoJe ot tbe 

claiaa. 

a. Your comments rnd aur-r.eatione are re·~aeste4 in due cmrse 

to aaaiet ta the ~re})ftretion or ea appropriete reply to tlMI ottlctel 

letter, bearing ill atn.4 th&t the U• tor tillDI the reapo••• wtll 

expire June S, 1938. 

CJaarle• A. Ro••• 

Jiii.tent• seetloa, 81pal Cort•
# C_2014099EN.01000201.xml

| 4.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 99/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 99/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

3 April 2014

2014/C 99/02

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3771 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 143,12 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4648 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82970 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9554 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2209 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2300 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,432 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,21 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1727 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4753 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9493 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4912 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5172 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6826 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,6149 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7395 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 456,88 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,6628 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5537 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6480 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 582,21 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,5223 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 62,021 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,9370 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,726 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,1356 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0593 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 82,8670 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3771

JPY

Japanese yen

143,12

DKK

Danish krone

7,4648

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82970

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9554

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2209

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2300

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,432

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,21

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1727

RON

Romanian leu

4,4753

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9493

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4912

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5172

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6826

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,6149

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7395

KRW

South Korean won

1 456,88

ZAR

South African rand

14,6628

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5537

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6480

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 582,21

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,5223

PHP

Philippine peso

62,021

RUB

Russian rouble

48,9370

THB

Thai baht

44,726

BRL

Brazilian real

3,1356

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0593

INR

Indian rupee

82,8670

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
## Attachment - B Signature Page

# Rule Signature Page Rule #:LSA #08-05(F) Agency: Air Pollution Control Board SUbject: CAIR Amendments ADOPTED: 

### By'

# J=~:: Chmrm . Air Pollution Control Board 

# APC:;:1;Q/ ..**n~E** By / :/ 7' 

# '! .Gr· 

### e /-

Attorney General, State ofIndiana Date: 

# "3/ dot;

Date:

APPROVED: By:

# '1Ue/~{}. Mitchell 

### E.

### Dani~, Governor, State ofIndiana ACCEPTED FOR FILING: Date:

By: TITLE 326 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD LSA Document #08-5(FR) Filed with Publisher: May 12. 2009. II: 16 a.m. By: RIw Date:

_