alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exhibit10c.htm




MDU Resources Group, Inc. Section 16 Officers and Directors


with Indemnification Agreements Chart







Section 16 Officers








	
Name

	
Title

	
Date of Agreement


	
Terry D. Hildestad

	
President and Chief Executive Officer, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
William E. Schneider

	
President and Chief Executive Officer, Knife River Corporation

	
August 12, 2010


	
John G. Harp

	
President and Chief Executive Officer, MDU Construction Services Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
Steven L. Bietz

	
President and Chief Executive Officer, WBI Holdings, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
David L. Goodin

	
President and Chief Executive Officer, Montana-Dakota Utilities Co., Great Plains Natural Gas Co., Cascade Natural Gas Corporation and Intermountain Gas Company

	
August 12, 2010


	
William R. Connors

	
Vice President – Renewable Resources, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
Mark A. Del Vecchio

	
Vice President - Human Resources, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
Nicole A. Kivisto

	
Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
Cynthia J. Norland

	
Vice President - Administration, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
Paul K. Sandness

	
General Counsel and Secretary, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
Doran N. Schwartz

	
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
John P. Stumpf

	
Vice President – Strategic Planning, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
Douglass A. Mahowald

	
Treasurer and Assistant Secretary, MDU Resources Group, Inc.

	
August 12, 2010


	
J. Kent Wells

	
President and Chief Executive Officer, Fidelity Exploration & Production Company

	
May 2, 2011







 







 







 






  





  











  













 


Directors








	
Name

	
Title

	
Date of Agreement


	
Harry J. Pearce

	
Chairman of the Board of Directors

	
August 12, 2010


	
Terry D. Hildestad

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010


	
A. Bart Holaday

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010


	
Thomas Everist

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010


	
Karen B. Fagg

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010


	
Dennis W. Johnson

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010


	
Thomas C. Knudson

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010


	
Richard H. Lewis

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010


	
Patricia L. Moss

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010


	
John K. Wilson

	
Director

	
August 12, 2010
REF ID:A488841 

I 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 
. ' ' . . 

I 

SPSIS Jll..5 SPSIS-3 

30 September 1944. 

MEMORANDUM tor Colonel Carter v. Clarke, G-2. 

Subject: Evidence re "Winds Execute Meaaage". 

1. All the pertinent record• ot tbe Signal Security Agenc7 

!'or the period. Movember-Dec-ber 19JU, which lligbt lw.ve reference 

to the "W1nda Execute" meaaage have been examined, and no evidence 

hag been discovered vhich would indicate that thia ••ease vas ever 

received at the Signal Secur1tJ Agency tram an7 aouroe. 

2. Signal Securit7 Agenc1 Bulletin (1941 designation, 318 E~ullet1n) file• tor the period Jfovember 28 to Deo•ber 10, 1941 

are complete with no miae1ng nU11bere appearing in the aeries. 

3. All peraona preae.ntly a.t Signal Security Agency who vould 

have any direct lcnovledge have be~n interviewed and no one ot them 

recollects ever having eeen either the or1g1111Ll or tranalation or 

this message. 

4. The followi.ng perao.i.~8 not p~eaentl) at S1~1 Seour1 ty 

Agency, but who vere in positions at that ti.lie vbich ~ould have 

permitted them to have aoceae to nueh ~ message are: 

J.'.!'esent .Rank & Ila• 

Colonel o. X. hd.tle:r, Sig. C. 

Colon$l R. ~. Minckler " " 

Colonel Harold Doud " n 

Colonel X. H. F. SvensBon, 

Cavalry. Lt. Col. R. E. Scbukr&tt, 

Sig .. C. 

Poa1t1on held 1n Deoeaber 19'-l 

Chier, ~, Collllunie&tiona. Serv1oe 

Chief, S1giial Intelligence 5erv1ce 

Chier, Crypt.anal7t1c Section 

Chief', Japanese Unit, Cryptana.l7t1c Section. 

Chier, Intercept Tratt1c Unit. 

5. Certain vork abeeta and lliacella.nooua •terial concerning Japanese Diploma.tic a71teme ot the 1941 period received trom the 

Navy 1n 19li2 a.re in. the Signal 8ecurit7 Agenc7. Thia •terial has 

been searched tor the "Y1nda R.xecute" meaaage "11tb negative results • 

·1~ w. Preston Corderman 

Colonelr Signal Corps Ch1of, Signal 5e4urit7 Branch 

·mp ~mm \: 

' i~ I 

c,r, • 

u: • -
99-1354.

#### State ex rel. Sevayega v. Pace.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Second Amendment to Employment Agreement - Richard A. Magnuson



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”), is made as of June 7, 2011, by and between
Digital Realty Trust, Inc. (the “REIT”) and DLR, LLC (the “Employer”, and together with the REIT, the “Company”) and Richard A. Magnuson (the “Employee”). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise
defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Employment Agreement (as defined below). 
 WHEREAS, the
Company and the Employee are party to that certain Employment Agreement, dated August 7, 2008, as amended by the First Amendment thereto, dated as of December 24, 2008 (the “Employee Agreement”); and 

WHEREAS, the Company, and the Employee desire to amend the Employment Agreement as set forth herein. 

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby
amend the Employment Agreement as follows: 
 1. The second sentence of Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby
modified, amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “If not previously terminated, the Term shall
automatically be extended for one additional year on the Initial Termination Date, and on each subsequent anniversary of the Initial Termination Date, unless the Company elects not to so extend the Term by notifying you, in writing, of such election
not less than thirty (30) days prior to the last day of the then current Term.” 
 2. This Amendment shall be and is
hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Employment Agreement. 
 3. All other terms and provisions of the Employment
Agreement shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein. 
 [Signature Page Follows] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first
above written. 
  

			
	DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC.,
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joshua A. Mills

	Name:	 	Joshua A. Mills
	Title:	 	General Counsel


  

			
	DLR, LLC,
		
	        By:	 	Digital Realty Trust, Inc.,
	        Its:	 	General Partner
		
	            By:	 	 /s/ Joshua A. Mills

	            Name:	 	Joshua A. Mills
	            Title:	 	General Counsel


  

	
	EMPLOYEE
	
	 /s/ Richard A. Magnuson

	Richard A. Magnuson


  
 2
~ . 

.... 

REF ID:A43489 

• .e 

20 July 1951 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3.3(h) (2) 

To P s F£1tn • nveeo 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETAJlT OF DEFENSE 

(ATTN: Oeneral 0. B. Er•klne. USM.C-R.et, 

As.tetant to the Secretary of Defen••, 

Special O?erattons) 

SUBJECT: United Stat•• Air Force Comm-1catlona Unit atJ .... ____ lfir 

1. Transferred for your action l• the oaly copy of the 

in.cloeure received. Colonel Roberte ad'V'laed me to open the letter 

in Admiral Frost'• absence. 

2. Upon review, it appear• thU the further action.a required 

properly are tho•• of th• Military :0.partmenta. Mr. Larkin of 

your office baa agreed to accept the action. Colonel Robena also 

ha• agreed that the action ahould be referred to the oUlce orlainatina 

the aubjeet. 

Incl: 

Ltr frr. The Secretary of State 

to Deputy Secretary of Defense, 

TS, HVCCO, (RCI-1158}, dtd 

14 July 61 

.112 

cc: DIR (w /incl) 

LOUIS W. TOR.DELLA 

Acting Director 

NSA TS CONTL NO. 61 02928 

COPY !-:0 ..... ,3..___ 

PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGES 

ADN (less Incl) 

D/DIR (Less Incl) 

M6 (Less Incl) 

M/R: Ltr of transmittal sending Incl as stated above 

to Gen Erskine for action. 

k. peterson, Acting Dir's office,3222,20Jul61 

., ' .. , .... ~ ""i'" I 

-· ... ~ ' .. y 

... .,I ........... . , 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-08-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
99-1145.

#### Valance v. Walker.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by Randy S. Valance. *Sua sponte,*cause *1487dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
, 

In re applioa~1oa of 

w1111a11 F. Frleds'6A1 •' al 

Serial no. 881,34' 

1Ued Januar1 !'!.~, lt32, 

Cr11i>iograph1c ro1a'9al 

llr1 

REF ID:A5220~ 

DiY. 16, Rooa !612 

hMt ee, i111. 

Oftic• LeUer of JQne 11, lHS 1• h.•r•'1' aaknowledged.. 

hppl .. ental to 6'"ndmtit clate4 Jwie lt, 1911, 1' l• 

••tred 'o ._n4 •• foll••• 

Olata• 1 aaat a an 01U1Dell8' wi'Ut.ftt preJwU,ae. 

Claim 3, line 4, cMcel "in Hries relation " 

ClaSJI 11 llntl 8 cha.nee the period a' 'he end ot 'the UM 

10 a conu. and ineeri the tollOWlllff: - • ea14 •~n.n• COlllPrl•inl' oontaot 

in 111ri•• rela\1on,- -

RBKAHK8 

contideration ot \hese claims i• aeked.. 

w1111 .. r.· Friechnan, •' al 

Confidential 

Peclassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texland Drilling Program-1981, LTD, (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof ( the Report), we, Jerry N. Namy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and M. E. Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Jerry N. Namy      
|    |  | Jerry N. Namy          
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer
|    |  | November 9, 2005       
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ M. E. Chapman      
|    |  | M. E. Chapman          
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer
|    |  | November 9, 2005
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                           Software AG Systems, Inc.
                       Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                                                           Predecessor        Successor
                                                                          -------------      ------------
                                                                           Three months      Three months
                                                                              ended             ended
                                                                             Mar. 31,          Mar. 31,
                                                                               1997              1998
                                                                          -------------      ------------
                                                                          (in thousands, except for per 
                                                                               share dollar amounts)
<S>                                                                      <C>                <C>
Weighted average common shares outstanding............................           24,338            29,517
Effect of dilutive securities.........................................            1,556             1,974
                                                                         --------------     ------------- 
Weighted average common shares outstanding - assuming dilution........           25,894            31,491
                                                                         ==============     =============
 
Calculation of net income per share:
  Net income..........................................................   $        1,373     $       5,390
                                                                         --------------     ------------- 
  Net income per share................................................   $         0.06     $        0.18
                                                                         --------------     ------------- 
  Net income per share - assuming dilution............................   $         0.05     $        0.17
                                                                         ==============     =============
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE


13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





I, John M. Benson, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A to the annual report on Form 10-K of Pathfinder Cell Therapy, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report.





Dated: April 30, 2013
By:
/s/ John M. BensonJohn M. BensonCFO and Treasurer
Exhibit 10.5


 


SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT


 


	TO:	The sole director of A SPAC I Acquisition Corp. (the “Company”).


 


The undersigned hereby subscribes for 2,875,000
Class B ordinary shares (the “Shares”) of the Company. In consideration for the issue of the Shares, the undersigned
hereby agrees and undertakes to pay $25,000.00 to the Company.


 


We agree to take the Shares subject to the Memorandum
and Articles of Association of the Company and we authorize you to enter the following name and address in the register of members of
the Company:


 


	 	Name:	A SPAC (Holdings) Acquisition Corp.
	 	 	 
	 	Address:	Ritter House, Wickhams Cay II, PO Box 3170, Road Town, Tortola VG1110, British Virgin Islands


 


In the event of the Company's initial public offering
(the "IPO") of units on a recognised stock exchange and the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters of the IPO (the
 "Over-allotment Option") is not exercised in full, we acknowledge and agree that the Company shall forfeit any and all rights
to such number of the Shares purchased and issued to us such that immediately following such forfeiture, we will own, in total, an aggregate
number of the ordinary shares (not including the ordinary shares underlying any private placement units or warrants (whether comprised
in any such units or standing alone) that may be issued to us upon exercise of any warrants or any securities or rights purchased by us
in the IPO or in the aftermarket) equal to 20% of the issued and outstanding ordinary shares of the Company immediately following the
IPO.


 


If any of the Shares are forfeited in accordance
with this agreement, then after such time we shall no longer have any rights as a holder of such forfeited Shares, and the Company shall
take such action as is appropriate to redeem and cancel such forfeited Shares, which may include by way of the compulsory redemption and
cancellation of such Shares for nil consideration. In addition, we hereby irrevocably grants the Company a limited power of attorney for
the purpose of effectuating the foregoing and agrees to take any and all action reasonably requested by the Company necessary to effect
any adjustment in this letter (including any such redemption as is referred to herein above).


 


The undersigned hereby irrevocably surrenders to the Company for cancellation
and for nil consideration the one Class B ordinary share standing in its name in the register of members of the Company.


 


For and on behalf of


A SPAC (Holdings) Acquisition Corp.


By:


/s/ Serena She Wing Shie


	Name:	Serena She Wing Shie	 
	Title:	Director	 


 


	Dated:	 June 4, 2021	 


 


Accepted:


 


For and on behalf of


A SPAC I Acquisition Corp.


By:


/s/ Serena She Wing Shie


	Name:	Serena She Wing Shie	 
	Title:	Director	 


 


	Dated:	 June 4, 2021
.Locator Card 

Mili tar,y Personnel Branch Capt. Mar.r C, Lane1 WAC 17 March J.9$2 

~-

-"< 

~-

1§._ __ _ ....._. ___ _ 

--- .. 

~ ...... -. ~-

~---

-- . 

1 

-

--· 

. -.. ~ 

.. 

Looatar cant ret'l4411Gd with entries aa requested.. 

,.. 

-

.»:.·-

MAia' C, UNE 

Captain, WAC 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-16-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352d 

. 

'r~ 

~-

---=- ---~---=--~---w--= ---' . 

. J 

J 

I 

.· ' i ·- . 

i 

.. 

·--1 .. 

,J 

I 

1 

4 

~ 

l . 

~
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 50 (Monday, March 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13560-13561]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06103]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice

March 12, 2015.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Wednesday, April 8, 2015.

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Secretary of Labor v. Wade Sand & Gravel 
Company, Docket No. SE 2013-120-M. (Issues include whether the 
Administrative Law Judge erred in upholding the Secretary of Labor's 
interpretation of his regulations governing the proposal of civil 
penalties.).
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and Sec.  2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202)

[[Page 13561]]

708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2015-06103 Filed 3-12-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
CHRIS M. “MATT” DILLON

LAWYER

P.O. Box 446 (512) 303-2889

Bastrop, Texas 78602 Toll Free Fax (866) 375-1815

November 17, 2016

Jeffrey D. Kyle, Clerk

Third Court of Appeals

PO Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711

Re: NO. 3-14-00703-CR

Timothy Wheat v. State

Dear Clerk of the Court:

The purpose of this letter is to comply with TRAP 48.4 for the above referenced 

cause. I have sent a letter with a copy of the opinion via certified mail return receipt 

requested to the last known address of the defendant as well as informing the 

defendant of his right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review on November 

17, 2016. 

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Very truly yours,

/s/ Chris M. Dillon

 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00703-cr

13851779

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

11/17/2016 1:36:25 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 11/17/2016 1:36:25 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Exhibit 23

The Board of Directors
of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration
statements (No. 333-29885, 333-81813, and 333-54688) on Form S-8 of Hungarian
Telephone and Cable Corp. of our report dated March 13, 2003, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. and
subsidiary as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders
equity (deficiency), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2002, and the related financial statements Schedules I
and II which report appears in the December 31, 2002 annual report on Form 10-K
of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.

KPMG Hungaria Kft.

Budapest, Hungary
March 25, 2003
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LISA WONG,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

KRACKSMITH, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellant,

and

BOSCHAL LEE; et al.,

Defendants,

v.

WILLIAM STOCKER,

Movant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 56765

D.C. No. 2:17

- cv

- 05978

- SVW

- E

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2019 **

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 19 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 56765

Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Appellants Kracksmith, Inc., and William Stocker, its attorney in this action,

appeal from the district court’s order remanding plaintiff’s action to California

state court. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

district court’s decision to remand a removed case

. Patel v. Del Taco, Inc. , 446

F.3d 996, 998 (9th Cir. 2006)

. We affirm.

The district court properly remanded the action to state court because

appellants failed to establish that the state court could not enforce their rights. See

id. at 998

- 99 (two

- part test for removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1443(1)). Contrary to

appellants’ contentions, appellants have not identified a California statute or

consti tutional provision that purports to command the state court to ignore their

federal civil rights. To the extent that defendants argue that removal was proper

under 28 U.S.C. § 1441, we lack jurisdiction to review the remand order. See 28

U.S.C. § 1447(d) ( court lacks jurisdiction to review the district court’s remand

order based on § 1441 ) ; Patel , 446 F.3d at 998

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by sua sponte awarding

sanctions against Stocker under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b) because

Stocker filed a frivolous notice of removal

. See Holgate v. Baldwin , 425 F.3d 671,3 17

- 56765

675

- 77 (9th Cir. 2005) (standard of review and factors for imposing Rule 11

sanctions); Barber v. Miller , 1 46 F3d 707, 7 11 (9th Cir. 1998) (Rule 11’s safe

harbor provision only applies where sanctions are raised through motion of a

party)

.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant s ’ motion

for reconsideration because appellants provided no basis f or reconsideration. See

Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah Cty., Or. v. ACandS, Inc. , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262

- 63 (9th

Cir.1993) (setting forth standard of review and requirements for reconsideration).

We reject as without merit appellants’ contentions that the distri ct court

denied them due process.

Appellants’ requests for fees and costs, set forth in their opening brief, is

denied.

AFFIRMED.