alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF CEOAND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. § 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO § 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

          Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Xerox Credit Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), Gary R. Kabureck, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John F. Rivera, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. **§**1350, as adopted pursuant to **§** 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his knowledge, that: 

          (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

          (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/    GARY R. KABURECK |  
 
**Gary R. Kabureck Chief Executive Officer November  12, 2002**

  
 
 
/s/    JOHN F. RIVERA

 
 
**John F. Rivera Chief Financial Officer November  12, 2002**

  
          This certificationaccompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934, as amended. |
|---------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                   (SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350,
                  CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), I, John W.
Elias, Chief Executive Officer of Edge Petroleum Corporation, a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge, that:

          (1) the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
     December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                   /s/ JOHN W. ELIAS
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                      John W. Elias
                                                 Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 19, 2004
# EXHIBIT 32.6

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Thomas Liguori, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Thomas Liguori
Thomas Liguori
Chief Financial Officer
August 8, 2005

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall
not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This
certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act,
except to the extent that Iomega Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
A 

.. 

"" 

REF ~ 

ID:A66560. 

1IZ" .._' l' --.- ' .. r ~ 

\.•' . 

' r 

~ • . . "'"'\ •. .... ~-

.. ; t • ' 

f"" ... • • ... 

... 

' 

. ' 

. ' 

22 April 19 ?4 

• • • ,lj. • 

-~: ..• ~FOR RECORD: ~ ...... : -: ... :' . .- ~ .... I • : .. 

~ . ~ 

, • ctn d'r ~bout 16 April 1954, Mr. Burtellund (sp. ?) of the Legislative ,,. : Reference Service o:f The Library of Congress talked to Lt. I. T. McDonald p 4 » • C .. • 1 ~... ,. 

~- ~ _ . .,..f.: . o~ '=the ~~l~_hoi;i.e ... and stated, in brief, that: 

, ; -" , 1. H~ belongs to an organized Reserve unit of which Dr. 

· Ca.npai~ne (NSA -R/D) is a member. " t... ..t,. .. 

"' 2-. lie queried Dr. Campaigne, who had referred him to Cdr. 

Pendergrass (NSA-TEC), who referred him to Mr. Friedman. 

3. He had been requested by Representative Melvin Price to 

determine if, since we had intercepted and read (1941) Japanese 

messages indicating the possibility of an attack on Pem::i:l Harbor, we 

bad intercepted and read similar messages indicating the possibility 

of attack against other American bases or cities. 

4. Melvin Price wanted the inf'orma.tion that same day. 

5. He (Mr. Burtellund) would prefer that the information 

not ge given if' it ~ant that Melvin Price's name would be divulged in connection with the request. 

Lt. McDonald ma.de no committal statement of any kind and gave no 

inf'orne.tion of' any kind. After discussing the matter with Mr. Friedma.n 

and the Chief' of Staff, Lt. McDonald called Mr. Burtellund (Code 173, 

X 703) and stated that the requested information was not available and 

recommended ~hat the suggestion be ma.de for Representative Price to 

Submit any such requests in the future through official channels. 

.. 

9-. 

I. 

-,;1,qt' 

T. McOONALD 

~ 

Asst to S/ASST 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-08-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

'• 

. 

j 

, ' • ,. • • ~ ... t 

.... -: ..... ~ i ~·:a.."! .. • ' , ., . -.. -=- . ,. •. -~ 

...
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 22-1694

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Kevin Kerr lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________ Submitted: December 6, 2022 Filed: December 9, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM.Kevin Kerr appeals after a magistrate judge 1 issued an order denying without

prejudice his motion seeking discharge from civil commitment, or in the alternative, to return to a prior facility. Upon careful review, we conclude this court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal, as Kerr did not timely seek review of the magistrate’s order by the district court, and thus there is no final, appealable order before this court. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 (courts of appeals have jurisdiction over appeals from final decisions of district courts), 636(b)(1)(A) (allowing district courts to “designate a magistrate judge to hear and determine any pretrial matter pending before the court”; party may file written objections to magistrate’s recommendation within 14 days); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) (party may not assign as error defect in magistrate judge’s order on nondispositive matter if not timely objected to); United States v. O’Laughlin, 31 F.4th 1042, 1044 (8th Cir. 2022) (concluding district court’s order of reference to magistrate judge citing § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.1 was not sufficient to convert magistrate’s order to final order for purposes of § 1291; dismissing appeal for lack of jurisdiction). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

______________________________

1 The Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri. -2-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          55,158
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   99,132
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,719
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               159,591
<PP&E>                                          33,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                  24,459
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 214,257
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,316
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           301
<OTHER-SE>                                     106,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   214,257
<SALES>                                        116,215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,215
<CGS>                                           48,369
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,369
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                50,224
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,481
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,946
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,535
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,535
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
1 

### Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Kenney, James (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:26 AM

To: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Subject: FW: 91.151 exemption

Jake,

Per our discussion this morning. We agree that the exemption request should be withdrawn.

Best regards,

Jim Kenney

From: Wiegand, Skip (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 11:18 AM

To: Kenney, James (FAA)

Cc: footw@aol.com ; Wilson, Mike (FAA)

Subject: RE: 91.151 exemption

I conferred with Mike

‐ he and I authored it

– and he concurs. Here is your one liner:

Mike Wilson and Skip Wiegand

– also speaking for Brad Howard

– request to withdraw the petition for exemption.

Thank you,

Skip Wiegand

From: Kenney, James (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 10:09 AM

To: Wiegand, Skip (FAA)

Subject: 91.151 exemption

Skip,

I spoke with ARM concerning the close out of your 91.151 exemption. Would you mind sending me a 1 sentence email

requesting that we withdraw the request? This is the easiest way to close it out.

Best regards,

Jim
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 10, 2016 106860 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DONALD CUOMO,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: September 20, 2016

Before: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Robert A. Regan, Glens Falls, for appellant.

Craig P. Carriero, District Attorney, Malone (Jennifer M.

Hollis of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Franklin

County (Main Jr., J.), rendered May 27, 2014, convicting

defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while

intoxicated.

Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of felony driving

while intoxicated in satisfaction of a three-count indictment. 

Pursuant to the plea agreement, which included a waiver of

appeal, County Court agreed to impose a split sentence of no more

than five years of probation with 180 days in jail. The court

thereafter sentenced defendant to five years of probation with

the first 180 days to be served in jail and other terms, and this

appeal ensued.

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that the sentence

is harsh and excessive in view of his alcoholism and other
-2- 106860 

factors. However, defendant's unchallenged waiver of appeal

precludes this contention (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256

[2006]). County Court explained during the plea colloquy that

defendant would ordinarily retain the right to appeal but that,

as a term of the plea arrangement, he was being required to waive

that right, making clear that the waiver was separate from the

trial-related rights automatically forfeited by his guilty plea

(see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at 256; People v Clark, 135 AD3d

1239, 1240 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 995 [2016]). Defendant then

agreed to waive his right to appeal "all aspects of this

proceeding other than constitutional issues and any violation by

the [c]ourt of its sentencing commitment." The court further

ascertained that defendant, who was 61 years old and had

extensive experience in the criminal justice system, had

discussed the waiver with counsel and understood it, establishing

that it was knowing, voluntary and intelligent (see People v

Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 340-341 [2015]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d at

256). Accordingly, as the court abided by its sentencing

commitment, defendant's valid appeal waiver forecloses this

claim.

McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ.,

concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2212 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

Act to provide for the authority to reimburse local governments or 

electric cooperatives for interest expenses, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself and Mr. SCOTT of Florida) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to provide for the authority to 

reimburse local governments or electric cooperatives for 

interest expenses, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘FEMA Loan Interest 

5 Payment Relief Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2212 IS

1 SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENT OF INTEREST PAYMENTS RE2 LATED TO PUBLIC ASSISTANCE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title IV of the Robert T. Stafford 

4 Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 5170 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 431. REIMBURSEMENT OF INTEREST PAYMENTS RE8 LATED TO PUBLIC ASSISTANCE. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The President, acting through 

10 the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management 

11 Agency, shall provide financial assistance to a local gov12 ernment or electric cooperative as reimbursement for 

13 qualifying interest. 

14 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section, the following 

15 definitions apply: 

16 ‘‘(1) QUALIFYING INTEREST.—The term ‘quali17 fying interest’ means, with respect to a qualifying 

18 loan, the lesser of— 

19 ‘‘(A) the actual interest paid to a lender 

20 for such qualifying loan; and 

21 ‘‘(B) the interest that would have been 

22 paid to a lender if such qualifying loan had an 

23 interest rate equal to the prime rate most re24 cently published on the Federal Reserve Statis25 tical Release on selected interest rates. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2212 IS

1 ‘‘(2) QUALIFYING LOAN.—The term ‘qualifying 

2 loan’ means a loan— 

3 ‘‘(A) obtained by a local government or 

4 electric cooperative; and 

5 ‘‘(B) of which not less than 90 percent of 

6 the proceeds are used to fund activities for 

7 which such local government or electric coopera8 tive receives assistance under this Act after the 

9 date on which such loan is disbursed.’’. 

10 (b) RULE OF APPLICABILITY.—Any qualifying inter11 est (as such term is defined in section 431 of the Robert 

12 T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance 

13 Act, as added by this Act) incurred by a local government 

14 or electric cooperative in the 5 years preceding the date 

15 of enactment of this Act shall be treated as eligible for 

16 financial assistance for purposes of such section. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 12.1
 
                     BLUE BIRD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
                    BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
 
             STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
            FOR THE YEARS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1998, NOVEMBER 1, 1997,
            NOVEMBER 2, 1996, OCTOBER 28, 1995 AND OCTOBER 29, 1994
 
                          (In Thousands Except Ratios)
 
                                      BBC
 
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         OCTOBER 31,     NOVEMBER 1,     NOVEMBER 2,     OCTOBER 28,     OCTOBER 29,
                                             1998            1997            1996            1995            1994
                                        --------------  --------------  --------------  --------------  --------------
<S>                                     <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
FIXED CHARGES:
Interest expense......................    $   33,300      $   32,488      $   16,455      $   16,282      $   15,224
Interest element of rentals...........           637             539             473             536             521
Amortization of debt issuance costs...         1,265           1,266           2,688           2,245           2,209
                                             -------         -------         -------         -------         -------
                                          $   35,202      $   34,293      $   19,616      $   19,063      $   17,954
                                             -------         -------         -------         -------         -------
                                             -------         -------         -------         -------         -------
EARNINGS:
Net income (loss).....................    $   21,667      $   10,597      $   23,765      $   16,852      $   15,408
Provision (benefit) for income
  taxes...............................        11,666          (4,473)         14,034          11,686          10,157
Fixed charges.........................        35,202          34,293          19,616          19,063          17,954
Interest capitalized..................           -0-             -0-             -0-            (208)           (145)
                                             -------         -------         -------         -------         -------
                                          $   68,535      $   40,417      $   57,415      $   47,393      $   43,374
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES....          1.9X            1.2X            2.9X            2.5X            2.4X
</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          23,084
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                26,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    106,960
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           106,960
<LOANS>                                        160,976
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,871
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 324,748
<DEPOSITS>                                     280,810
<SHORT-TERM>                                    10,416
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,325
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        20,689
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 324,748
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,891
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,848
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,388
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                24,127
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,589
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,763
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           17,364
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  21
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 12,355
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,569
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      10,569
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,161
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .064
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,108
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,609
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      113
<RECOVERIES>                                        75
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,871
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,871
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>