alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# CE2004078EN.01059902.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/599 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/599

---

(2004/C 78 E/0633)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3585/03

by Mogens Camre (UEN) to the Commission

(5 December 2003)

Subject:   The EUMC's shelved report on Muslim anti-Semitism

Subject:

According to the ‘Financial Times’ and the Danish newspaper ‘Berlingske Tidende’ of 23 November 2003, the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) in Vienna has shelved a 112-page report on anti-Semitism which the EUMC had itself commissioned from university research staff in Berlin.

The reason why the report is being shelved is said to be that it did not portray the political image sought by the EUMC. Indeed, it revealed that it is Muslim immigrants and pro-Palestinian groups who are behind most of the attacks on Jewish property and persons in Europe, and Beate Winkler, the EUMC's strongly pro-Muslim director, did not want this to come out.

Beate Winkler and her monitoring centre have systematically sought to portray an image of Europeans as racist irrespective of the fact that this image is a false one in all essentials. All Muslim communities in the EU — as in the rest of the world — are witnessing flagrant breaches of the European Convention on Human Rights. This primarily takes the form of wide-scale oppression of women with many Muslim communities in the EU implementing Sharia law in the form of discrimination against women in the matter of inheritance in breach of the legislation in the Member States; still worse, there are what are known as the ‘honour killings’ of women wanting their freedom and even the killing of women who have been the victims of rape. These grave matters have never been dealt with by the EUMC.

The EUMC has systematically portrayed a false image of who the racists are and who is infringing human rights in the EU. Now Beate Winkler also wants to conceal the anti-Semitism of Muslims.

What action does the Commission intend to take in order to halt the one-sided politicising activity of the EUMC and ensure truthful information about racist threats and human rights' infringements in the EU?

---
· f'.\pproved for Release bv NSA on 09-13-2013 pursuant to E 0 1352fJ 

NEVER u~.~l';l:ls~ MEMO ROUTING SLIP CONCURRENCES. OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

1 NAME OR Tl~ \""t, '::'.> INITIALS CIRCULATE 

,__:_l\:...:...;..\(..::_. _____ l"\~·-=.Y:..._:.-1-t ...;._A_~_K_t:;__t'J._s....;:i.., 1 ____ ---· 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION ' ) ..:J:; DATE COORDINATION 

1-2~~~~~~~~~~,~--=:;._~---

3 

4 

REMARKS 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NarE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

FROM NAME OR TITLE__.... " • DATE ~ 

-· • ;· ~ .. I. .... \ \ I \ l------.,_..,.~~ .... -~-~-~~-~~ ... ~e---I 111.. •• ~ ORGANIZATION A~ 

DD FORM 9 5 Replacee DA AGO Form 895, 1 Apr 48, and A..FRQ I FEB 50 Form lll, 10 Nov 41, whlc.b. JDa7 lie asOcL
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10K 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 29, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-29-1996
<CASH>                                           8,297
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,525
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,637
<INVENTORY>                                     44,055
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               120,772
<PP&E>                                         269,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                 153,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 373,090
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           85,795
<BONDS>                                         70,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                     214,582
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   373,090
<SALES>                                        581,929
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               581,929
<CGS>                                          449,885
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  449,885
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,864
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,687
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,122
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,122
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.73
        

</TABLE>
-4. -· ... • 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

SIGNAL CORPS LABORATORIES OFFICE OF THE OFFICER IN CHARGE 

FORT MONMOUTH 

IN REPLY REFER TO 

Mr. William F. Jriedma.111 

Office· of the Chief Signal Officer, 

Mani tions m dg •• 

Wa.sb.ington1 D. C. 

My dear Friedman: 

OCEANPORT, NEW JERSEY 

Apt!l 22, 1932 

:Reference is ma~ to 1'CJlll" letter of April 18. I1; is 

gmtifying to note that 33 claims of aur original 50 have been allowed 

in the first Patent Office actioxi. I hope tbey vere the right ones. 

The matter of the gavel"DJ19nt sequesteri:ag tlie patent presents several· questions 1ihich 101Jld recp.ire consideration before any decision Dl81' be made. 

The f'lrat considemtion from the standpoint of the government is to dete:rmi:ae tb.e value derlwd from such an action. The government 

semred our p:Ltent fOr us anl reserved the rit,hts of m&mlfac1nre or use, 

the exploitation of comm.ercial rights bei~ entirely under our control • 

.Again the pa.tent was conceived "while we were on the govermental pqroll. 

Howver, I am under the impression· that a rather broad policy exists in 

this respect and tbat the goverment will appraise and ~ for the privilege of wl.thholding a gi"V9D pa.tent from commercial. exploitation for a ce~ 

tain length of time. 

The major points tor the representatives of the government 

to dete:anine are: · 

. . 

a. 'lb.e likelihood of another inventor conceivi:ag ou.r same 

arnmgement indePenlently. There is alavs this possibility which seana 

to be increased by the muber of inw:D.tors 'tho are now devotiDg their 

efforts to cipher· machines. A IBrallel circumstallCa of such independent 

conception is tbe carbon button telephone tranmd tter. 

_R. !be appraisal of the val."ll8 to the goverrment and to 

ou.rselves at the restriction from commercial exploitation. 

The Wrede report has been completed ba.t has been held up 

•itiJ?g Ca,ptain ::eack•s signature. Be has been in Chicago for about one 

pproved for Release by NSA on 11-20-2013 pursuant to E.O. 

13526 

--
. . :::· 

REF ID:A522123 • 

Le to Mr. Frledmau. .4-22/32 · Sheet *2 

week. You will probabq recei w the report the first of the 11eek. 

'l!he cipher rrachine bas P.rOven very satisfacto17 at the 

lo•r speeds ~t I 10'Uld lUB to tbo~hly' investigate the higher speed pos~ib111 ties. The secoJJd machine is also UDder oonstmc tion. 

G.AG:F 

-2-
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17E0013. IN THE INTEREST OF: A. F., ET AL., CHILDREN (MOTHER).

It is hereby ordered that the emergency motion requesting an extension of time

in which to file an Application for Discretionary Appeal is hereby GRANTED

pursuant to Court of Appeals Rule 31 (g). The Application for Discretionary Appeal

will now be due on or before the 13th day of December 2016. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/07/2016

November 07, 2016
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 5, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50289

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

EDGAR DOMINGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-03-CR-120-4

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Edgar Dominguez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to

distribute cocaine, aiding and abetting, and possession with

intent to distribute cocaine. He argues that the evidence of his

guilty knowledge was insufficient to support either conviction.

Because Dominguez did not renew his motion for judgment of

acquittal at the close of all evidence, our review of the

sufficiency of the evidence is limited to determining whether 
No. 04-50289

-2-

there was “a manifest miscarriage of justice.” See United States

v. Green, 293 F.3d 886, 895 (5th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted). 

To find a miscarriage of justice, “the record must be devoid of

evidence of guilt or the evidence must be so tenuous that a

conviction is shocking." United States v. Avants, 367 F.3d 433,

449 (5th Cir. 2004). 

The record in this case is not devoid of evidence of

Dominguez’s guilty knowledge, nor is his conviction shocking. 

See id. The jury could have inferred that Dominguez had

knowledge of the conspiracy and knowingly possessed cocaine based

on: (1) the extent of his communications with the other codefendants, especially Stephen Vasquez, during the time of the

transaction; (2) the fact that Vasquez indicated to Sgt. Smith

that Dominguez was the source of the cocaine; (3) the fact that

the shoe box Dominguez delivered contained cocaine; (4) the fact

that the shoe box obviously contained something other than shoes;

and (5) the fact that, after delivering the box, Dominguez waited

in the parking lot instead of driving off. Consequently, the

conviction is AFFIRMED.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14166]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06231]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 15-010]

Notice of Intent to Grant a Partially Exclusive License

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of intent to grant a partially exclusive license.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is issued in accordance with 35 U.S.C. 209(e) and 
37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i). NASA hereby gives notice of its intent to grant 
a partially exclusive license in the United States to practice the 
invention described and claimed in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 
13/987,251 entitled Fluid Harmonic Absorber and U.S. Patent No. 
8,939,178 entitled Variable-Aperture Reciprocating Reed Valve to 
Thornton Tomasetti, Inc., having its principal place of business in New 
York, NY. The patent rights in these inventions have been assigned to 
the United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The prospective 
partially exclusive license will comply with the terms and conditions 
of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

DATES: The prospective partially exclusive license may be granted 
unless, within fifteen (15) days from the date of this published 
notice, NASA receives written objections including evidence and 
argument that establish that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. 
Competing applications completed and received by NASA within fifteen 
(15) days of the date of this published notice will also be treated as 
objections to the grant of the contemplated exclusive license.
    Objections submitted in response to this notice will not be made 
available to the public for inspection and, to the extent permitted by 
law, will not be released under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 
U.S.C. 552.

ADDRESSES: Objections relating to the prospective license may be 
submitted to Mr. James J. McGroary, Chief Patent Counsel/LS01, Marshall 
Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 35812, (256) 544-0013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Sammy A. Nabors, Technology 
Transfer Office/ZP30, Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, AL 
35812, (256) 544-5226. Information about other NASA inventions 
available for licensing can be found online at http://technology.nasa.gov.

Sumara M. Thompson-King,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2015-06231 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14358]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06318]



[[Page 14358]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service


Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to 
RENEWABLE NUTRIENTS, LLC. of PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINA, an exclusive 
license to U.S. Patent No. 8,574,885, ``ANAMMOX BACTERIUM ISOLATE,'' 
issued on NOVEMBER 5, 2013.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mojdeh Bahar of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as RENEWABLE NUTRIENTS, LLC. of 
PINEHURST, NORTH CAROLINA has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-06318 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
CONCUR; and Opinion Filed July 23, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00024
- CV JAMES D. ANDERTON, I NDIVIDUALLY AND AS T HE TRUSTEE OF THE JIMMIE W. AND ERTON AND FRANCES E. ANDERTON REVOCABLE LIVING TRU ST AGREEMENT , Appellants V. JENNIFER GREEN , Appellee On Appeal from the 354th District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 79011 

### CONCURRING OPINION Before Chief Justice Wrigh t, Justice Lang

- Miers, and Justice Whitehill

Concurring Opinion by Justice Whitehill I agree with and join in the court’s opinion as correctly decided based on the issues raised and the record before us. I write separately to address only the preservation issue discussed in
footnote four of that opinion.
I n my view, appellants ’ complaint about whether Jennifer failed to segregate her recoverable attorneys’ fees is substantively a complaint about the sufficiency of the evidence to support the amount awarded. See Tony Gullo Motors I, L.P. v. Chapa , 22 S.W.3d 299, 314 (Tex. 2006) (“Unsegregated attorney’s fees for the entire case are some evidence of what the segregated amount should be.”) (footnote omitted). As such, that issue could have be en raised for the first time on appeal from this nonjury case. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 33.1(d).– 2

–

Therefore, future appellate courts should not need to address the error preservation issues footnote four discusses when resolving whether an attorneys’ fees claimant proper ly segregated
recoverable attorneys’ fees from non

- recoverable attorneys’ fees when a trial court tries that issue

.

170024CF.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
**Exhibit 99.3**

 
| (LOGO) | Deloitte  & Touche LLP  |
|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Two  Prudential Plaza       |
|   | 180 North  Stetson Avenue   |
|   | Chicago, IL  60601-6779 USA |
|   |                        |
|   | Tel: +1 312  946 3000       |
|   | Fax: +1 312  946 2600       |
|   | www.deloitte.com            |

 

INDEPENDENTACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT

 

 

To the Board of Directors of JohnDeere Capital Corporation

 

 

We have examined management’sassertion that John Deere Capital Corporation (the Company) has complied as ofand for the period from inception to October 31, 2004, with its establishedminimum servicing standards described in the accompanying Management’sAssertion - John Deere Owner Trust 2004 dated January 28, 2005. Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with those minimum servicingstandards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertionabout the Company’s compliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards established by the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with its minimum servicingstandards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary inthe circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion. Our examination does not provide legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with its minimum servicing standards.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned minimum servicingstandards as of and for the period from inception to October 31, 2004, isfairly stated in all material respects based on the criteria set forth inAppendix I.

 

 
| /s/ Deloitte  & Touche LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
|                           |
| January 28,  2005              |

 

19

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM AMERICAN ELECTROMEDICS CORP. FORM 10-QSB FOR THE PERIOD ENDED
OCTOBER 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                             289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,291
<ALLOWANCES>                                        10
<INVENTORY>                                      1,471
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,631
<PP&E>                                             667
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (404)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,747
<BONDS>                                            720
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           255
<OTHER-SE>                                         912
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,873
<SALES>                                          1,830
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,830
<CGS>                                            1,058
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,058
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   687
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  78
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (20)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (20)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (20)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equidyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marcus
R. Rowan, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
based on my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: December 12, 2002
                                                     By: /s/ Marcus R. Rowan
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Marcus R. Rowan
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 11 North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON AND COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
March 31, 2005
(unaudited) Three Months Ended(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
    
    March 31, 2005
    
    
    March 31, 2004Net Income
    
    $
    259,035
    
    
    $
    102,519Common and Common Equivalent Shares:Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding
    
    
    466,476
    
    
    
    222,404Weighted Average Common Equivalent Shares
    
    
    6,837
    
    
    
    2,965Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares
    
    
    473,313
    
    
    
    225,369Net Income per Common Share  Basic
    
    $
    .56
    
    
    $
    .46Net Income
per Common and Common Equivalent Share - Diluted
    
    $
    .55
    
    
    $
    .45
 40
99-1344.

#### State ex rel. State Fire Marshal v. Curl.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion for leave to intervene of Frank V. Darst and Green River Display Company, Inc. Motion granted; *sua sponte,*the above intervenors are joined as respondents pursuant to Civ.R. 21.

Cook, J., dissents.