alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32(a)
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO
 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF
 THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer , hereby certifies to the best of the
undersigned's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 (1)  The Report complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 in all material respects; and
 
 (2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
  Date: February 15,
      2010
              By:
              /s/  Robert
      A.
      LermanRobert A.
      LermanPresident and Chief
      Executive Officer
  This
certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the small business issuer
specifically incorporates it by reference.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the

Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the

Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound

volumes go to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 17

- BG

- 1259

IN RE LANCE BUTLER, III

201 7 D DN 279

A Member of the Bar of the

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Reg istration No. 993234

BEFORE: Beckwith

, Associate Judge, and Washington and F a rr e ll , Senior Judges.

O R D E R

(FILED

– February 1, 2018)

On consideration of the certified order of the Court of Appeals of Maryland

disbarring respondent from the practice of law in that jurisdiction

, this court’s

December 12 , 2017 , order suspending respondent and directing him to show cause

why reciprocal discipline should not be imposed

, and the statement of Bar Counsel

regarding reciprocal discipline

, and it appearing that respondent has failed to file

either a response to this court’s order to show cause or an affidavit as required by

D.C. Bar R. XI, §14 (g), it is

ORDERED that Lance Butler, III

, is hereby disbarred from the practice of

law in the District of Columbia

. See In re Sibley , 990 A.2d 483 (D.C. 2010), and

In re Fuller , 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical

reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not

participate). It is

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatem ent the period of

respondent’s disbarment will not begin to run until such time as he files a D.C. Bar

R. XI, § 14 (g) affidavit.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32

Section 1350 Certifications 
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
with Respect to the North Valley Bancorp Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q 
for the Quarter ended September 30, 2008

Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of North Valley Bancorp, a California corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Companys Quarterly
  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Form
  10-Q) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | Information contained in
  the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
  condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                            

|                         |                                                               
|------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 10, 2008 | /s/ Michael J. Cushman                                        
|                         |                                                               
|                         | Michael J. Cushman                                            
|                         | President and Chief
  Executive Officer                       
|                         | (Principal Executive
  Officer)                               
|                         |                                                               
|Dated: November 10, 2008 | /s/ Kevin R. Watson                                           
|                         |                                                               
|                         | Kevin R. Watson                                               
|                         | Executive Vice President
  & Chief Financial Officer          
|                         | (Principal Financial
  Officer & Principal Accounting Officer)

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to North Valley Bancorp and will be retained by North Valley Bancorp
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13900-13901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06155]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings; National Science Board

    The National Science Board's Committee on Strategy and Budget 
(CSB), pursuant to NSF regulations (45 CFR part 614), the National 
Science Foundation Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1862n-5), and the 
Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), hereby gives notice of 
the scheduling of a teleconference for the transaction of National 
Science Board business, as follows:

DATE & TIME: Wednesday, March 18, 2015, 4:30-5:30 p.m. EDT.

SUBJECT MATTER: Discussion of Performance Improvement Officer Report on 
FY 2017 Strategic Issues.

STATUS: Closed.
    This meeting will be held by teleconference. Please refer to the 
National Science Board Web site www.nsf.gov/nsb for additional 
information and schedule updates (time, place, subject matter or status 
of meeting) which may be found at http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/notices/. 
Point

[[Page 13901]]

of contact for this meeting is Jacqueline Meszaros (<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#107a7d75636a71627f507e63763e777f66"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d5750584e475c4f527d534e5b135a524b">[email protected]</span></a>).

Ann Bushmiller,
Senior Counsel to the National Science Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-06155 Filed 3-13-15; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31 (b)





CFO CERTIFICATIONS



I, John F. Rivera, Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Xerox Credit
Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report
any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





August 12, 2003



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/S/    JOHN F. RIVERA                     
|John F. Rivera Principal Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE INTEREST OF A.A., A CHILD.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-15-00177-CV

Appeal from

65th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2013DCM9384)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore 

dismiss the appeal. We further order that because Appellant is indigent, no order regarding costs 

is made. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2015.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
-SERVED4U-LY 12, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

KYLE PONSFORD 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP09AL0007 

(Civil Penalty Case) 

DMS FAA-2009-0729 

DEFAULT JUDGEMENT 

Complainant, Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant" or "agency") 

filed a Complaint dated July 24, 2009. By Order dated May 4, 2010, Kyle Ponsford 

("Respondent") was deemed to have answered the Complaint. 

Pursuant to Respondent's Request for Hearing, dated August 2, 2009, this matter 

was set for hearing in Juneau, AK. on June 29, 2010. Our Hearing Notice was served on 

January 13,2010. 

On June 29, 2010, Respondent failed to appear at the hearing he requested. 

WHEREFORE, it be and is hereby ORDERED as follows: 

1. Respondent's Request for Hearing be and is hereby DISMISSED with 

prejudice: 

2. Respondent be and is hereby DEEMED to have admitted to all of the 

allegations in Complainant's Complaint; 

3. Judgment be and is hereby ENTERED ascjidl-penalty in the amount of 

$1,000.00 against Respondent as requested iirjScffnplaJDant's Complaint. 

UCf 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP09AL0007 - | 

(Civil Penalty Action) I 

CORRECTED SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Suite 2W1000' 

ONE COPY 

Kyle Ponsford, Respondent 

HC 60 Box 3394 

Haines, AK 99827 

Glenn H. Brown, Complainant's Counsel 

Senior Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel, AAL-7 

Alaskan Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

222 West 7* Avenue, Box 14 

Anchorage, AK 99513-7587 

TEL: 907-271-5269 

FAX: 907-271-2800 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room El2-320 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: Attorney-Advisor 202-366-2139 

Legal Assistant 202-366-5121 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1777 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1777

 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to authorize the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to maintain or replace certain facilities and structures 
  for commercial recreation services at Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 15, 2015

 Mr. Risch (for himself and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to authorize the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to maintain or replace certain facilities and structures 
  for commercial recreation services at Smith Gulch in Idaho, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF FACILITIES AND STRUCTURES AT 
              SMITH GULCH.

    Section 3(a)(24)(D) of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act (16 U.S.C. 
1274(a)(24)(D)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``The Secretary shall also authorize or continue to authorize 
maintenance or replacement of facilities and structures listed in this 
subparagraph for commercial recreation services at Smith Gulch whose 
location is defined above. The facilities and structures referred to in 
this subparagraph are--
            ``(i) motorized landscaping equipment, such as lawnmowers 
        and weed trimmers;
            ``(ii) chainsaws;
            ``(iii) gasoline-powered electrical generators and 
        associated electrical transmission facilities;
            ``(iv) hydroelectric generators and associated electrical 
        transmission facilities;
            ``(v) gasoline-powered water pumps for fire suppression;
            ``(vi) transition from propane to electrical lighting;
            ``(vii) solar energy systems; and
            ``(viii) 6-volt or 12-volt battery banks for power 
        storage.''.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 5, 2009

/s/Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       ---------------

                                                       Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

**CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 5, 2009

/s/ Robert E. Wolfe

                                                          --------------

                                                         Robert E. Wolfe

                                                         Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.

Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum

opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain

computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of

Appeals and does not include the filing date. 

1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

3 Plaintiff-Appellee,

4 v. NO. 34,252

5 JOSEPH GIRAUDO,

6 Defendant-Appellant.

7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY

8 Charles W. Brown, District Judge 

9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

10 Santa Fe, NM 

11 for Appellee

12 Gorence & Oliveros, P.C.

13 Robert J. Gorence

14 Louren Oliveros

15 Albuquerque, NM

16 for Appellant

17 MEMORANDUM OPINION

18 WECHSLER, Judge.
2

1 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

2 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has

3 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

4 {2} Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in our calendar notice.

5 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 __________________________________

7 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge

8 WE CONCUR:

9 _________________________________

10 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge

11 _________________________________

12 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 10, 2022

No. 04

- 21

- 00094

- CV

CITY OF EAGLE PASS,

Appellant

v.

Isabel Ve lasquez PEREZ, individually and a/n/f of Vanessa Velasquez, minor,

Appellee

From the 293rd Judicial District Court

, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18

- 01

- 35130

- MCV

Honorable Maribel Flores , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martin ez, Chief Justice

Beth Watkins , Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez , Justice

On March 23, 2022 , appellee filed a “ Mot ion to Issue Mandate, or in the A lternative,

Renewed Motion to Lif

t Stay

. ” On Apri l 4, 2022

, appellant filed a respon se. Appe llee ’ s Motion

is DENIED

.

It is so ORDERED on May 10, 2022

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

______________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6401

BENJAMIN F. SALLEE, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge.

(CA-97-1185-2)

Submitted: July 22, 1999 Decided: July 27, 1999

Before ERVIN, HAMILTON, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Benjamin F. Sallee, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Susan Lynn Watt, George

Maralan Kelley, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk,

Virginia; Michael Alexander Stover, Richard K. Preston, II, UNITED

STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Chevy Chase, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is date stamped February

24, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on

the docket sheet on February 26, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and

79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that

the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the

effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Sallee, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Sallee v. United States Parole Comm’n, No. CA-97-1185-2

(E.D. Va. Feb. 26, 1999).* We deny Sallee’s motions for bail

pending appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
99-954.

#### State v. Hill.

Stark App. No. 1998CA0083. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
*Wednesday, September 22, 1999*

MERIT DOCKET

99-724.

#### State ex rel. Graffi v. Horizon Freight Sys., Inc.

Franklin App. No. 98AP-71. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss sustained. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.