alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                       EXHIBIT 11* TO REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

                       TELXON CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

                 (Dollars in thousands except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                         Three Months Ended              Six Months Ended
                                             September 30,                 September 30,
                                        ---------------------         ----------------------
                                         1995          1994            1995            1994
                                        -------       -------         -------        -------
<S>                                     <C>           <C>             <C>            <C>
Net income applicable to
    common shares                       $ 2,811       $ 1,619         $ 5,040        $ 2,892
                                        =======       =======         =======        =======
Weighted average common shares
    outstanding for the period           16,248        15,796          16,066         15,677

Increase in weighted average from:
         Dilutive effect of stock
                options                      51             0              89              0
                                        -------       -------         -------        -------
Weighted average common shares
    assuming issuance of the above
    securities                           16,299        15,796          16,155         15,677
                                        =======       =======         =======        =======
Net income per common share:
         On the weighted average
            common shares outstand-
            ing for the year            $   .17       $   .10         $   .31        $   .18

         Assuming issuance of shares
            for dilutive stock
            options**                   $   .17       $   .10         $   .31        $   .18
</TABLE>




 *      Numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

**      This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K Item
        601(b)(1) although not required for income statement presentation
        because it results in dilution of less than three percent. The Company's
        7 1/2% Convertible Debentures were omitted from the fully diluted
        calculation due to their antidilutive effect.
----

| 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:           March 23, 2010 | CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                                                                   | (Registrant)             |
|                                                                                   |                     |   |
|                                                                                   | By:                      | /s/ Edward J. Fred |
|                                                                                   |                     | Edward J. FredChief Executive Officer, President and Director |

| Dated:           March 23, 2010 | CPI AEROSTRUCTURES, INC. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                                                                                   | (Registrant)             |
|                                                                                   |                     |   |
|                                                                                   | By:                      | /s/ Vincent Palazzolo |
|                                                                                   |                     | Vincent PalazzoloChief Financial Officer and Secretary |

----
# C_2014299EN.01000101.xml

| 5.9.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 299/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 299/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7325 — ICG/KIRKBI/Minimax Viking Group)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 299/01

On 7 August 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7325. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7325. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

          - [NRC-2015-0007]

# AGENCY:

Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

License amendment request; opportunity to comment, request a hearing, and petition for leave to intervene; order, correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is correcting a notice that was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 3, 2015, that contained an amendment request for Perry Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. This action is being taken to correct the date of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) accession number for the amendment request from FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Eva A. Brown, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; telephone: 301-415-2315; email:                         *Eva.Brown@nrc.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of February 3, 2015 (80 FR 5816), FR Doc. 2015-01917, on page 5819, in the middle of the second column, under “FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company, Docket No. 50-440, Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Lake County, Perry Ohio,” after “                    *Date of amendment request,”*                     the date “September 12, 2014” is corrected to read “October 8, 2014.”                

Dated in Rockville, Maryland, this 9th day of March, 2015.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Eva A. Brown,

Senior Project Manager, Plant Licensing III-2 and Planning and Analysis Branch, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

[FR Doc. 2015-05944 Filed 3-13-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7590-01-P
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of -- ) 

) 

Gilford Corporation ) 

) 

Under Contract No. W912DR-14-C-0019 ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 59734 

Charles M. Asmar, Esq. 

David A. Edelstein, Esq. 

Asmar, Schor & McKenna, PLLC 

Washington, DC 

Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. 

Engineer Chief Trial Attorney 

William J. Selinsky, Esq. 

Scott C. Seufert, Esq. 

David B. Jerger, Esq. 

Assistant District Counsel 

U.S. Army Engineer District, Baltimore 

OPINION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE TING 

On 16 June 2014, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Baltimore District, 

(USACE or government) awarded Contract No. W912DR-14-C-0019 (the contract) to 

Gilford Corporation (Gilford or appellant). The contract was for the construction of 

the North Post Access Control Point at Fort Belvoir, Virginia. 

The contract incorporated by reference the following clauses, among others, 

FAR 52.249-2, TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF GOVERNMENT (FIXED-PRICE) 

(APR 2012)-Alternate I (SEP 1996), and FAR 52.249-10, DEFAULT (FIXED-PRICE 

CONSTRUCTION) (APR 1984 ). 

By letter dated 12 September 2014, the USACE contracting officer terminated 

the contract for default for Gilford's failure to provide performance and payment 

bonds within the time specified in the contract. Gilford timely appealed the decision 

by notice dated 10 December 2014 to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals 

(ASBCA or Board). The appeal was docketed as ASBCA No. 59734. 

The parties have settled their dispute and have jointly requested that the Board 

issue a decision incorporating the terms of their agreement as set forth in their 

14 November 2016 "RULE 19(D) STIPULATION AND JOINT MOTION FOR 

DECISION." 
In accordance with Rule 19( d) of the Rules of the ASBCA and the stipulation of 

the parties, it is the Board's decision, in the nature of a consent judgment, that: 

1. The termination for default is converted to a no-cost termination for the 

convenience of the government; 

2 .. The Board makes no (zero) monetary award to appellant; and 

3. Any claim for termination costs or other costs associated with or arising out 

the contract by appellant is waived. 

Dated: 22 November 2016 

I concur 

/ 

·MARKN. ~~-STEMPLE 

Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

·t$:.T~ Administrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

c 

RJCHARDSHACKLEFORD 

Administrative Judge 

Vice Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59734, Appeal of Gilford 

Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

2 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
null

2014-09-11

308.68054

eng - Argued: 2014-09-11. Docket number: 1-13-3020
# C_2014391EN.01000101.xml

| 6.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 391/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 391/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7428 — Iridium/DIF/Concession Businesses)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 391/01

On 30 October 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7428. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7428. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1966

MILTON S.C. MAYS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RAYNOR BUILDERS OF LOUISBURG; RICHARD RAYNOR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, 

District Judge. (5:14-cv-00027-BO)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Milton S.C. Mays, Appellant Pro Se. Blair Kristen Beddow, 

BROUGHTON, WILKINS, SMITH, SUGGS & THOMPSON, PLLC, Raleigh, 

North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Milton S.C. Mays seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing Mays’ civil action for failure to prosecute. We 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice 

of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the 

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. 

R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on 

July 17, 2015. The notice of appeal was filed on May 31, 2016. 

Because Mays failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to 

obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EX-10.11





 Exhibit 10.11 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
 TO THE

 CLAIRE’S HOLDINGS LLC 

2018 MANAGEMENT EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 

This Amendment No. 1 (this “Amendment”) to the Claire’s Holdings LLC 2018 Management Equity Incentive Plan, as
amended from time to time (the “Plan”), is made effective as of this 1st day of August, 2019. 

WHEREAS, Claire’s Holdings LLC (the “Company”) maintains the Plan; 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Plan, the Company’s Board of Managers (the “Board”) may, at any time and
from time to time, amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board desires to amend the Plan to permit Awards (as defined in the Plan) to be made
to certain recipients who may not be natural persons, pursuant to the terms of the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows: 
 1. Capitalized Terms. Capitalized terms that are not defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in
the Plan. 
 2. Amendment to the Plan. The Section 2(q) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“(q) “Eligible Person” means (1) each employee of any member of the Company Group, including each
such person who may also be a director or manager of any member of the Company Group, (2) each non-employee director or manager of any member of the Company Group (and, in the case of a non- employee director or manager who is an employee, partner, member or other agent or service provider of an Investor, any entity affiliated with such Investor and designated by such
non-employee director or manager, as approved by the Board), (3) each other person or entity who provides substantial services to any member of the Company Group, and (4) any natural person who has been
offered employment by any member of the Company Group; provided, that such prospective employee may not receive any payment or exercise any right relating to an Award until such person has commenced employment with any member of the Company
Group. An employee on an approved leave of absence may be considered as still in the employ of a member of the Company Group for purposes of eligibility for participation in the Plan.” 

3. Ratification and Confirmation. Except as specifically amended by this Amendment, the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all
respects and remains valid and in full force and effect. 












 4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the laws of the State of Delaware without reference to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof. 
 *    
*     * 

  
 - 2 -
# CA2014277EN.01001501.xml

| 22.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 277/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 277/15

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OFFICIAL JOURNALS

(2014/C 277 A/02)

Please find below the list of C A Official Journals published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, the Official Journals are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 6 | |
| 11 | |
| 19 | |
| 21 | |
| 26 | |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (PL) |
| 35 | |
| 41 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 42 | |
| 43 | |
| 46 | |
| 47 | |
| 48 | |
| 55 | |
| 56 | |
| 60 | |
| 62 | |
| 65 | |
| 73 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 74 | |
| 81 | |
| 88 | |
| 92 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 97 | |
| 98 | |
| 99 | |
| 108 | |
| 109 | |
| 116 | |
| 119 | |
| 133 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | |
| 137 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 140 | |
| 145 | |
| 152 | |
| 160 | |
| 163 | |
| 164 | |
| 176 | |
| 178 | |
| 180 | |
| 182 | |
| 185 | |
| 186 | |
| 188 | |
| 195 | |
| 207 | |
| 209 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 211 | |
| 217 | |
| 219 | |
| 242 | |
| 254 | |
| 255 | |
| 256 | (LV) |
| 258 | (RO) |
| 262 | (EN) |
| 267 | (SL) |
| 270 | (FR) |
| 272 | (DA) |
| 274 | (IT) |
| 277 | |

5

6

11

19

21

26

27

30

(PL)

35

41

(DE/EN/FR)

42

43

46

47

48

55

56

60

62

65

73

(DE/EN/FR)

74

81

88

92

(DE/EN/FR)

97

98

99

108

109

116

119

133

134

136

137

(DE/EN/FR)

140

145

152

160

163

164

176

178

180

182

185

186

188

195

207

209

(DE/EN/FR)

211

217

219

242

254

255

256

(LV)

258

(RO)

262

(EN)

267

(SL)

270

(FR)

272

(DA)

274

(IT)

277

---
# C_2014116EN.01000201.xml

| 16.4.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 116/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

15 April 2014

2014/C 116/02

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3803 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,62 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4662 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,82510 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,0902 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2162 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2295 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,459 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,23 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1868 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4690 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9369 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4697 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,5171 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,7028 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5932 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7283 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 437,09 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,5027 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5868 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6207 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 770,39 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4777 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 61,424 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 49,7226 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,555 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0621 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 18,0012 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 83,1389 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3803

JPY

Japanese yen

140,62

DKK

Danish krone

7,4662

GBP

Pound sterling

0,82510

SEK

Swedish krona

9,0902

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2162

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2295

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,459

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,23

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1868

RON

Romanian leu

4,4690

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9369

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4697

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,5171

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,7028

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5932

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7283

KRW

South Korean won

1 437,09

ZAR

South African rand

14,5027

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5868

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6207

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 770,39

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4777

PHP

Philippine peso

61,424

RUB

Russian rouble

49,7226

THB

Thai baht

44,555

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0621

MXN

Mexican peso

18,0012

INR

Indian rupee

83,1389

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A0 36
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-23-00002-CR

No. 10-23-00005-CR

EX PARTE CEDRIC DEON CLARK

From the 413th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. F48586

Trial Court No. F-201900014

Original Proceedings

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On January 4, 2023, Cedric Deon Clark filed what appears to be original habeas 

corpus proceedings seeking to have this Court issue writs of habeas corpus and “release

[him] from unlawful confinement” and “cease and desist” “violations of [his]

Constitutional Amendments.” This Court, however, has no jurisdiction over these 

original applications for writ of habeas corpus. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 22.221; TEX.

CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.05; see also Ex parte Gambrell, Nos. 10-22-00004-CR & 10-22-
Ex parte Clark Page 2

00005-CR, 2022 Tex. App. LEXIS 372, at *1 (Tex. App.—Waco Jan. 19, 2022, orig. 

proceeding) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing original applications 

for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction).

Accordingly, we dismiss these proceedings for want of jurisdiction.

STEVE SMITH

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson,

and Justice Smith

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 11, 2023

Do not publish

[OT06]