alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6756

JOHN W. ICKES,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

JASON WILSON, Facility Director; TWALLA MOORE, Property 

Dept. Supervisor,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District 

Judge. (1:15-cv-00605-LO-IDD)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 22, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Woodward Ickes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Brown 

Beckner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, 

Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

John Woodward Ickes, Jr., appeals the district court’s 

order granting Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this 

civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated 

by the district court. Ickes v. Wilson, No. 1:15-cv-00605-LOIDD (E.D. Va. filed May 11, 2016 & entered May 13, 2016). We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2014283EN.01000101.xml

| 26.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/1

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

25 August 2014

2014/C 283/01

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3200 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,13 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4552 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79567 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1489 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2087 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1515 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,833 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 312,96 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1785 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3952 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8758 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4175 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4457 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2303 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5787 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6492 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 346,49 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1174 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1242 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6308 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 462,78 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,1746 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 57,881 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,7272 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,219 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0069 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3243 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 79,9326 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3200

JPY

Japanese yen

137,13

DKK

Danish krone

7,4552

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79567

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1489

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2087

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1515

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,833

HUF

Hungarian forint

312,96

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1785

RON

Romanian leu

4,3952

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8758

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4175

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4457

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2303

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5787

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6492

KRW

South Korean won

1 346,49

ZAR

South African rand

14,1174

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1242

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6308

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 462,78

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,1746

PHP

Philippine peso

57,881

RUB

Russian rouble

47,7272

THB

Thai baht

42,219

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0069

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3243

INR

Indian rupee

79,9326

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0005374 17-MAR-2017 08:01 AM
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AutoInfo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William
Wunderlich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ William Wunderlich
-------------------------------
William Wunderlich
Chief Financial Officer
April 30,  2003


                                       17
f) ~F. ID :A6751'\I 

\It.... . li..P 

Patent Application 1300212 on a Crn>tographic Device 

( 1) R &: D It 1a thought that pa.tent application 

300212 which aa .tiled OD October 19, 1939, 

covering cipher device M-138 and M-1381, ba8 become 

important to the armament and defense of the trnited 

states. Notification was received from the Patent 

Ottice OD J'Ulle 18, 1940, that this cue waa read7 tor :laaue. 

At the time or ftllng ~t •• not deemed neoeaB&l"J 01" 

advisable to pit th1a case under the so-called 3""J'88.Z" nle to 

prevent its illflwmce bat it is believed tbat oircumatancea 

have changed since that time and for these reasona it 

1a recomended that the above cited application be 

withdrawn from 1.asue to avoid a srant of a patent at 

this time. / 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§
##### 



Exhibit 31.2

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, F. Robert Merrill III, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced
Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: August 12, 2003

| |  |                               
| |  | ------------------------------
| |  | /s/ F. Robert Merrill III     
| |  |                               
| |  | Name: F. Robert Merrill III   
| |  | Title: Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: FIDEL H. PAJARILLO,

Debtor,

------------------------------

 FIDEL H. PAJARILLO,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC; et

al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 14-15977

D.C. No. 2:13-cv-01935-RCJ

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Nevada

Robert Clive Jones, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 16, 2016** 

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

FILED

NOV 22 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Fidel H. Pajarillo appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing

for failure to prosecute his appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his

adversary proceeding. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158. We review for

an abuse of discretion. In re Fitzsimmons, 920 F.2d 1468, 1471 (9th Cir. 1990). 

We vacate and remand.

The district court abused its discretion in dismissing Pajarillo’s bankruptcy

appeal because it did not explicitly consider alternative sanctions. See id. at 1474

(“[U]nless there are egregious circumstances, the district court must, as the general

rule requires, explicitly consider relative fault and alternative sanctions.”); In re

Hill, 775 F.2d 1385, 1387 (9th Cir. 1985) (failure to consider alternative sanctions

is an abuse of discretion).

In light of our disposition, we do not consider Pajarillo’s other arguments on

appeal.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

The mandate shall issue forthwith.

VACATED and REMANDED. 

2 14-15977
# C_2014203EN.01000201.xml

| 1.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 203/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 203/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7120 — Ecom Agroindustrial Corporation / Armajaro Trading)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 203/02

On 23 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7120. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7120. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
BRANDON WARD,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-1735

_____________________________/

Opinion filed November 23, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County.

Kathleen F. Dekker, Judge.

Robert A. Morris, The Law Offices of Robert A. Morris, LLC, Tallahassee, for 

Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
SIG PO 

TSRU: LOO 

REF ID:A63523 

U3Vl.JJ.J,Caneellat1ai of Contract Bo •• :M.J.8-ll9-ac-109 

File Ho. 267-LYK-58, Mr. William F. Friedman 

TRG 

' I Of r.~ 0 I BUA ei.t:t 

4 Aug 59 

J.Caj,n/'J'!BG-02/4o57/a:l.s 

J.. Request that the balmlce or Contract Bo. DA.18-ll.9-sc-109 with Kr. William F. 

!'riedma.n be cancelled. Mr. FriedmitJl~urequeated this cancellation -ror reasons of 

ill hea1th. 

2. All :materials turnished Mr. Friedman under the :provisions of ArticJ.e VI of 

•ubject contract have been returned to BSA (Ref: telecan between CWO Schreiber, 

toG-ll, and Mr. Ca.in, 'l!JIG-02, 3 Aug 59).. . 

3. Mr. Friedman has been paid $4, 000.00 tor work to date an the contract. 

lfo further ~nt ia due. 

cc: 

caa-3 

L00-2 

LOG-ll(CWOSahreiber) 

SBEIBY L.. PATTERSON 

Director ot Training 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

TO: SIGPO l'RCH: LOG-2 Dt\TB: 6 Aub l.959 C<JIMEN'.l! NO. 2 

J/l:JCarpenter/3245/dk. 

LOG concurs and requests that the balance of the Caitract be cancelled. 

cc: CCllP-3 

LOG-11 (CWO Scrieber) 

~""'11-e----

JOBll A. TASKER 

Chief', Acquisition Division 

Office of Logl.st1c Services 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

--- --~----~---
Exhibit 23.2

[RYDER SCOTT COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-143474) and
Form S-8 (No. 333-141254, No. 333-113619, No. 333-106484, No. 333-61890,
No. 333-93209, and No. 333-22571) of Edge Petroleum Corporation (the "Company"), of our summary report dated March 10, 2008 included as Exhibit 99.1
to this Annual Report on Form 10-K in respect of our reserve report relating to the oil and gas reserves and revenues of certain interests of the Company as of December 31,
2007 and of the data extracted from such reports appearing in "Items 1 and 2. Business and Properties under the caption "Oil and Natural Gas Reserves" and in Note 22. Supplementary
Financial Information on Oil and Natural Gas Exploration, Development and Production Activities (unaudited) of the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31,
2007, each contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K. We hereby consent to all references to such reports and/or this firm in such Annual Report on Form 10-K
and we hereby consent to all references to such reports and/or to this firm in each such Registration Statement, and further consent to our being named as an expert in each such Registration Statement
and in each Prospectus to which any such Registration Statement relates.

| |  | /s/ Ryder Scott Company, L.P.RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------

Houston,
Texas
March 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Treasurer & Controller




Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Comtex News Network, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Paul Sledz, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge that:




1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purpose of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




February 16, 2010
/s/ Paul SledzPaul SledzTreasurer & ControllerPrincipal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 32(b)

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION



I
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that the accompanying Form 10-KSB of Harbor Bankshares Corporation, (the
Company) for the annual period ended September 30, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form
10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                               |  |  |  |                    
|------------------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------
|                               |  |  |  |                    
|                               |  | 
|By: /s/ Teodoro J. Hernandez   |  |  |  | March 23, 2004 Date
|                               |  |  | 
|Teodoro J. Hernandez Treasurer |  |  |
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: November 17, 2016 106794 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ABDUL MOHAMMED,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: October 18, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Garry, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ.

__________

Michael C. Ross, Bloomingburg, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Michael C.

Wetmore of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Peters, P.J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County

(Herrick, J.), rendered March 18, 2014, convicting defendant upon

his plea of guilty of the crimes of petit larceny and resisting

arrest.

Defendant, a citizen of Ghana, waived indictment and agreed

to be charged in a superior court information with the crimes of

petit larceny and resisting arrest. He pleaded guilty to these

crimes and waived his right to appeal, both orally and in

writing. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was to be

sentenced to consecutive one-year jail terms. At sentencing,

County Court acceded to defense counsel's request, unopposed by

the People, to sentence defendant to 364 days in jail for each

crime due to the "immigration consequences." County Court

proceeded to sentence defendant to consecutive terms of 364 days
-2- 106794 

in jail. Defendant, who is being held on a detainer for

deportation, now appeals.

Defendant contends that he was denied the effective

assistance of counsel because counsel failed to properly advise

him of the immigration consequences of his guilty plea, thereby

rendering it involuntary. Although this claim is not precluded

by defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal, it is

unpreserved for our review as the record does not disclose that

he made an appropriate postallocution motion (see People v

Austin, 141 AD3d 956, 957-958 [2016]; People v Tamah, 133 AD3d

923, 924 [2015]). Moreover, given that defendant did not make

any statements during the plea colloquy that cast doubt upon his

guilt or called into question the voluntariness of his plea, the

narrow exception to the preservation requirement is inapplicable

(see People v Lobaton, 140 AD3d 1534, 1535 [2016], lv denied 28

NY3d 972 [2016]; People v Perkins, 140 AD3d 1401, 1403 [2016]). 

Furthermore, to the extent that defendant bases his claim upon

alleged misinformation imparted to him by counsel that is outside

the record, the appropriate remedy is for defendant to bring a

CPL article 440 motion to vacate the judgment of conviction (see

People v Zakrzewski, 140 AD3d 1536, 1537 [2016]; People v

Hernandez, 140 AD3d 1521, 1523 [2016], lv denied 28 NY3d 971

[2016]).

Garry, Devine, Clark and Aarons, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
# C_2014242EN.01000401.xml

| 25.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 242/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 242/4

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

24 July 2014

2014/C 242/04

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3472 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 136,97 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4573 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79215 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,2102 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2152 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3610 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,480 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,76 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1408 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4068 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8194 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4272 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4449 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,4412 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5679 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6688 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 385,96 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1380 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,3464 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6250 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 585,25 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2827 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,349 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,1080 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,891 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9884 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,4368 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,0071 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3472

JPY

Japanese yen

136,97

DKK

Danish krone

7,4573

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79215

SEK

Swedish krona

9,2102

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2152

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3610

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,480

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,76

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1408

RON

Romanian leu

4,4068

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8194

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4272

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4449

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,4412

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5679

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6688

KRW

South Korean won

1 385,96

ZAR

South African rand

14,1380

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,3464

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6250

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 585,25

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2827

PHP

Philippine peso

58,349

RUB

Russian rouble

47,1080

THB

Thai baht

42,891

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9884

MXN

Mexican peso

17,4368

INR

Indian rupee

81,0071

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---