alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: SABRA ALBRITTON,

 Debtor,

SABRA ALBRITTON,

 Appellant,

 v.

STANLEY J. KARTCHNER; et al.,

 Appellees.

No. 10-60026

BAP No. 08-1333-DuJuPa

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Dunn, Jury, and Pappas, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2011** 

Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Sabra Albritton appeals pro se from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s

judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting Countrywide Home

FILED

NOV 02 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-60026

Loans, Inc.’s motion for relief from an automatic stay with respect to certain real

property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo

BAP decisions, and apply the same standard of review that the BAP applied to the

bankruptcy court’s ruling. Boyajian v. New Falls Corp. (In re Boyajian), 564 F.3d

1088, 1090 (9th Cir. 2009). We may affirm on any ground supported by the

record, Stevens v. Nw. Nat’l Ins. Co. (In re Siriani), 967 F.2d 302, 304 (9th Cir.

1992), and we affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion by granting relief from the

automatic stay with respect to certain real property because the real property at

issue was not property of the bankruptcy estate, and Albritton had no equity in that

property. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(1), (2) (allowing bankruptcy court to grant relief

from the stay either for cause or with respect to property in which the debtor has no

equity and which is unnecessary to an effective reorganization); Moldo v. Matsco,

Inc. (In re Cybernetic Servs., Inc.), 252 F.3d 1039, 1045 (9th Cir. 2001) (reviewing

for an abuse of discretion the bankruptcy court’s decision to grant relief from an

automatic stay).

Albritton’s remaining contentions are unpersuasive.

Countrywide’s opposed motions for sanctions and to strike, filed on July 12,

2010, are denied. 
3 10-60026

Albritton’s opposed motion to file an amended reply brief, filed on

December 16, 2010, is granted.

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated February 25, 1999, except for the
termination of the line of credit described in Note 9, which is as of March 24,
1999 relating to the financial statements of Renaissance Worldwide, Inc., which
appears in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 26, 1998.


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 28, 1999
T e P 5 E C R E T 

FROM : SUSLO LONDON 

TO : DIRNSA 

MSG NR: LW 374 

DTG : 281522z MAY 54 

REF WL 252 AND LW 276. 

ROUTINE 

AGI NR:: ¢7277 

ACT: 

INFO: 

PRELIMINARY REPORT ON 

P/P 1-4 

V/DIR 5 

DCS t> 

C/S 1 

AG 8-1¢ 

115 n 

S/ASST 'JZ 

DD/PROO 13 

....-~~~~~~~~~~~~---' 

271423z MAY, INSTRUCTED .__~~~~~~~~~~~~~----I 

GIVE INFO TO NSA 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

NSA 115 NOTE: WL 252 IS AGO NR 11224, ORIG P/P. 

LW 276 IS AGI NR ¢5628. 

DATE RECD: 281857z MAY 54 JE/RW . TOP SECRET CONTROL NR 54-·f-¢189j' PAGE 1 OF 1 PAGE 

COPY / 9-..QF 13 COPIES 

PARAPHRA.SE NOT REQU l RED 

CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING 

TOP SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-13-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  277,999                 135,471
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          7,807,992               9,750,926
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               8,085,991               9,886,397
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     277,999                 135,471
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,807,992               9,750,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 8,085,991               9,886,397
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                    0                (87,355)
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                                 0                  69,400
<COMMISSIONS>                                        0                 115,706
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                (109,067)                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (109,067)                  56,025
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   (109,067)                  56,025
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (109,067)                  56,025
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.63)                    0.68
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.63)                    0.68


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. P-2744-043]


N.E.W. Hydro, LLC; Notice of Technical Meeting

    Project Name and Number: Menominee/Park Mill Hydroelectric Project 
No. 2744.
    Date and Time of Meeting: March 27, 2015; 10 a.m. Eastern Time (9 
a.m. Central Time).
    Place: Telephone conference with N.E.W. Hydro, Inc.
    FERC Contact: Chelsea Hudock, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c3a0aba6afb0a6a2edabb6a7aca0a883a5a6b1a0eda4acb5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6b5beb3baa5b3b7f8bea3b2b9b5bd96b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 502-
8448.
    Purpose of Meeting: To discuss the applicant's responses (filed on 
April 2, 2014 and December 2, 2014) to the Commission's Additional 
Information Requests filed on August 26, 2014 and December 31, 2013, 
and other outstanding questions following the Commission's review of 
the N.E.W. Hydro's application, filed on February 28, 2013.
    A summary of the meeting will be prepared and filed for the 
project's records.
    All local, state, and Federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other 
interested parties are invited to participate by phone. Please contact 
Chelsea Hudock at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5d6ddd0d9c6d0d49bddc0d1dad6def5d3d0c7d69bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07646f626b746266296f726368646c476162756429606871">[email protected]</span></a> or (202) 502-8448 by close of 
business March 17, 2015, to RSVP and to receive specific instructions 
on how to participate.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06206 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                             <C>            
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             6607
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   6607
<PP&E>                                                0
<DEPRECIATION>                                        0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     6607
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              8796 
<BONDS>                                               0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                           6941
<OTHER-SE>                                         (334)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       6607
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  10760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   0
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                          0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (10760)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.016)
        


</TABLE>
RE:AiZ~ip~:J~~.a Rz_q. ~~Ll)~:"-' 

tfo.~ ~· if{Q)[Aro~~~ :. F~i . • ?y From: Tokyo (NERNS, .Vice Chief; Gen. staff) ~ To: ircular {Berlin, La Paz, Lima, Mex1co City~ 

~ ' Stockholm) (RIKUGUN) . 8 December 1941.· 

J 693 ·l) parte complete 

• 

REVISION. 

l., Japan has been patient since .the 

spring but the tyrannical attitude of the tT-aS. 

has made _it impossible to reach any compr.om_ise in our negotiations and today Imperial Japanese Army, Navy, and Air units attacked UoS. and · 

British forces.in the south. (We are eending 

a separate wire on the details of the· negotia- tions.) : · 

We need not emphasize th~ fact that the 

fate of our country is at stake· in this opening of hosttiltieeo ~ 

For the time being11 please stress the 

.following points in propa.ganda against the U.So: 

Part 2 1. Britain and the UoS. had been 

steadfast 'in their .opposition to Japan 1s f1x~d 

and natural policy of prosecuting the China 

incidento Moreover, they had increasea m111tary·prep~rationsr. organized an economic 

blockade, and were completely encircling Japan. Finally, it reache~ the point where the very exist·enee of the Japanese Empire was threatened D 

Japanese 

'i'OP SECRE'I' 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

n· 2825 

Page 1 

This sheet of paper ~nd all of its contents must be safeguarded with the greatest care. . Utmost secrecy ls necessary to prevent drying up this sort of vital Intelligence at its source. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
• 

• 

.. 

REF ID:A487828 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

2. :Japan has great-faith in ~he 

Rome-Berltn~Tokyo Axis ano hae made cl~ar her 

determination to cooperate in the.establishment 

of a- new world order~ · . 

Part 3 2, we would like you to. send ue (~)' 

. detailed report(s) of your opinions on the 

decisive step taken by Japan and continue sending intelligence report.s: a It 1e our earnest hope that· even though y9ur daily living conditions 

may.grow more and more restrtcted, that you shall 

contlnue in your work, helping our count.ry now embroil~d in a great conflict. 

(Wire addressed to all attaeheso) 

3. For daily repol'.1ts on the situation, other than special reports, please rely on DOMEI 

wires and overseas broadcastso 

Inter 8 Dec 41 (3) Japanese Rec •·a --M-- - · T.rar~tf 13 Jan··· 1.J.5 ( 1028-h) 

TOP SECRE'f 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

• 

D 2825 

Page 2 

This sheet of paper and all of its contents must be safeguarded with the greatest care. Utmost secrecy is necessary to prevent drying up this sort of vital intelllgence·at its source. . '
REF ID:A363132 

DFC 16 1947 

...... bl.a 

!t. c..ils1o%»l¢> <>t Pa•ts 

JL&CtRICC. SYSTEM 

Se:lal ~ 549,006 

ftle4 11 Aupat 1944 

B.r lfilllea r. ~ 

:::;:. ~~~"tt!:!1:a.~}.~itle IA A1ll4 tio this invention bu been usigtlt\d to the United Sia'- by u~t. Pll.~ ~ on w about tho da.t. 

ot 1~t1944 by i1ll.1aa F. ~'1. 

( S1 !ZDPd) KENNETH C. 'ROYA!Jj 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0454. GABRIEL BRADLEY v. THE STATE.

Gabriel Bradley pled guilty to armed robbery, aggravated assault, false

imprisonment, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony. On

March 4, 2013, the trial court entered a judgment of conviction against Bradley and

sentenced him to 13 years’ imprisonment. On September 21, 2016, Bradley filed a

motion for an out-of-time appeal, claiming that his trial counsel did not advise him of

his appellate rights or respond to his requests to file an appeal. Apparently without

receiving any ruling from the trial court on the motion, Bradley filed a notice of appeal

of his conviction and sentence that same day. We lack jurisdiction.

To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry of the

judgment sought to be appealed. See OCGA § 5-6-38 (a). The proper and timely

filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer jurisdiction on this

Court. Rowland v. State, 264 Ga. 872, 872 (1) (452 SE2d 756) (1995). A defendant

may move a trial court for leave to file an out-of-time appeal based on the errors of his

trial counsel. Id. at 875 (2). If the trial court enters an order granting the motion, the

defendant has 30 days from the filing date of that order to file a notice of appeal

referencing his conviction. Id. at 876 (2). If the trial court enters an order denying the

motion, the defendant has 30 days from the filing date of that order to file a notice of

appeal referencing the denial of the motion for an out-of-time appeal. Id. Here,

because Bradley filed his notice of appeal more than three years after entry of the

judgment he seeks to appeal, and the record does not contain any ruling from the trial

court on his motion for an out-of-time appeal, his appeal is untimely. Accordingly,

this appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. 

November 03, 2016
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/03/2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-START>                  OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                          0
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                0
<PP&E>                          0
<DEPRECIATION>                  0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           592,065
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        48,881
<OTHER-SE>                      (640,946)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    0
<SALES>                         32,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                32,318
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   51,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (18,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (18,824)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (18,824)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (.002)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (.002)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000352162
<NAME> NORTH EAST INSURANCE COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        13,003,334
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      90,247
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   60,958
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              17,401,410
<CASH>                                       3,491,782
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           5,197,262
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,379,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,922,719
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             14,039,011
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          6,388,861
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,046,842
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,369,275
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,922,719
<PREMIUMS>                                   6,588,965
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            569,086
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              26,051
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   4,322,103
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  3,052,900
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (190,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (70,531)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (120,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (120,370)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00414-CV 

IN RE NICHOLAS BRIGANDI, 

TAWNYA BRIGANDI, AND ALL 

OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 2428 

CHERRY LANE, LITTLE ELM, 

TEXAS 75068 

 RELATORS

---------- 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

TRIAL COURT NOS. CV-2016-01542, E16-179J2 

---------- 

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

---------- 

 After considering relators’ petition for writ of mandamus and the response 

of the real parties in interest, the court is of the opinion that relief should be 

denied because relators have an adequate remedy by appealing Denton County 

Court at Law Number Two’s October 18, 2016 dismissal order. Accordingly, 

relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is denied. This court’s November 3, 2016 

stay order remains in effect until (1) the date a judgment issued by this court 

resolving a timely-filed appeal becomes final if relators timely file a notice of 

 1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4., 52.8(d). 
2

appeal or (2) if no appeal is filed, upon the expiration of the time for filing a 

motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.3. 

PER CURIAM 

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and SUDDERTH, JJ. 

DELIVERED: November 17, 2016
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has det ermined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 98-60740

___________________________ RAMON A. GARCIA; BERTHA E. GARCIA, Petitioners-Appellants,
VERSUS COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent-Appellee.

___________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States Tax Court

(21532-95)

___________________________________________________ July 22, 1999 Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The decision of the United States Tax Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the tax court's Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion, T.C. Memo. 1998-203 (June 3, 1998).
AFFIRMED.
99-925.

#### Lippert v. Peace.

Hancock App. No. 5-99-01. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause held for the decision in 99-219, 222, 223 and 224, *Karr v. Borchardt,*Seneca App. Nos. 13-98-33, 13-98-36, 13-98-35 and 13-98-34; briefing schedule stayed.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.