alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amendment to Morgan Stanley 401(k) Savings Plan, dated as of June 1, 2011



 EXHIBIT 10.2 
 AMENDMENT TO 
 401(k) SAVINGS PLAN 

Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (the “Corporation”) hereby amends the Morgan Stanley 401(k) Savings Plan (the
“401(k) Savings Plan”) as follows: 
 1. Effective at the end of May 31, 2011, Section 1, Definitions, shall
be amended by inserting the following at the end of the definition of “Company”: 
 “Beginning after May 31,
2011, ‘Company’ means Morgan Stanley Domestic Holdings Inc., a Delaware corporation, which shall be the Plan’s sponsor.” 
 2. Effective at the end of May 31, 2011, Section 8, Employee Stock Ownership Plan, shall be amended by inserting the following at the end of the first paragraph of subsection (a) thereof:

 “Effective at the end of May 31, 2011, sponsorship of the Plan was transferred from Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated to Morgan Stanley Domestic Holdings, Inc. Such transfer of sponsorship is not intended to affect the continuing status of the ESOP component of the Plan as an ESOP within the meaning of Code section 4975(e)(7) and Treas. Reg. section
54.4975-11(a)(2).” 
 3. Effective at the end of May 31, 2011, Section 19, Amendment and Termination, shall be
amended by inserting the following after the penultimate sentence of each of the first paragraphs of subsections (a) and (b) thereof: 
 “Beginning after May 31, 2011, the preceding sentence shall no longer apply and the Company’s Board of Directors has delegated its authority in respect of the Plan to the Management
Committee of Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC.” 
 4. Effective at the end of May 31, 2011, Appendix A, Participating
Companies, shall be amended by adding a new Participating Company as follows: 
 “Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (but
only to the extent          06/01/2011 
 “provided by the otherwise applicable
terms of the Plan) 
 * * * * * * * * * 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment to be
executed on its behalf as of this 1st day of June, 2011.

  

			
	 MORGAN STANLEY & CO.
 INCORPORATED

		
	By:	 	/s/ JEFFREY BRODSKY
	Title:	 	Global Head of Human Resources



  
 2
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

996 

CA 15-01410 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION OF PETER J. 

RUSSELL, INTERIM EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, OF CENTRAL 

NEW YORK PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, 

PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JASON TRIPP, A PATIENT AT CENTRAL NEW YORK 

PSYCHIATRIC CENTER, CONSECUTIVE NO. 21706, 

RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

 

EMMETT J. CREAHAN, DIRECTOR, MENTAL HYGIENE LEGAL SERVICE, UTICA

(BRYCE THERRIEN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (PATRICK A. WOODS OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Erin P.

Gall, J.), entered July 20, 2015. The order, inter alia, granted the

application of petitioner for authorization to administer medication

to respondent over his objection. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order granting

petitioner’s application for authorization to administer medication to

respondent over his objection. The order has since expired, rendering

this appeal moot (see Matter of Bosco [Quinton F.], 100 AD3d 1525,

1526). Contrary to respondent’s contention, this case does not fall

within the exception to the mootness doctrine (see Matter of McGrath,

245 AD2d 1081, 1082; see generally Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50

NY2d 707, 714-715).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,205,094
<SECURITIES>                                 1,146,450
<RECEIVABLES>                                  235,334
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,596,497
<PP&E>                                       1,804,711
<DEPRECIATION>                               (976,726)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,424,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          216,772
<BONDS>                                        169,857
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,155
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,006,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,424,482
<SALES>                                        315,059
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               381,763
<CGS>                                          131,666
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  226,657
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               213,800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (58,694)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,304
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (36,390)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        



</TABLE>
. • 'iii( REF ID: A7227. 

~-n-~·11.RTERS r m:.rmr.:.·on TIJ.LL S?!.TION" 

Office of the Conria.nding Of ficcr 

a ( /. ) <!!..- H Arlington, Va. 

20 Januar-.f 1944 

SU':3JECT: Questions on Security 

TO: kll Personnel 

1. There is presently beinis compiled a set of security 

instructions to be known as Post Security He~ulations. These 

lti.ll, upon publication, govern the conduct of all Post personnel 

with respect to security. 

2. In order that any questions re~arding security vr~ich 

have been bothering you may be clarified, it is ur~ed thc~t all 

personnel eive serious attention to the matter and after reflection, subnlit to their supervisors or unit heads, nny questions 

they may have about ".lha.t they ca.n say or do, or vrhere they can !.';O 

on the post -- in short, anythinz at all which is not clear to 

then. 

3. 'i'hese v•ill be consolidated and the answers will be, so 

far as possible, incorporated in Post Security l~-3Ulations for 

the instruction and guidance of all. 

4. It is desired that all questions be submitted by 

6 February 1944. 

By Order of Colonel Cordeman: 

~ 11. lJ14cD~~ / ohn N. tracDonald, / 

st Lt., Si~l Corps. 

Post Intelligence Officer 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-24-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Shelter
Properties III Limited Partnership 1997 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified
in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000353282
<NAME> SHELTER PROPERTIES III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,016
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       36
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          25,567
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  15,428
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          8,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       6,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    15,428
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,777
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 384
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       345
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.21<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06174]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2013-0907]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zones; Upper Mississippi River Between Mile 38.0 and 46.0, 
Thebes, IL; and Between Mile 78.0 and 81.0, Grand Tower, IL.

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published in the Federal Register of March 5, 
2015, a final rule document making final an interim rule previously 
published at 79 FR 66622 on November 10, 2014. The March 5 final rule 
incorrectly cited the interim rule as published at 77 FR 75850 on 
December 26, 2012. This document corrects the citation and date in that 
final rule to correctly reflect the proper interim rule citation and 
effective date.

DATES: Effective on March 18, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule, 
call or email LT Dan McQuate, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 270-442-1621, 
email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8de9ece3e4e8e1a3e7a3e0eefcf8ecf9e8cdf8feeeeaa3e0e4e1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="90f4f1fef9f5fcbefabefdf3e1e5f1e4f5d0e5e3f3f7befdf9fc">[email protected]</span></a>. If you have questions on viewing or 
submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone (202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard published a document in the 
Federal Register of March 5, 2015 making an interim rule final as 
published. The citation to the interim rule was published incorrectly. 
This correction removes the incorrect citation and amendatory 
instruction for 33 CFR part 165.
    In rule FR Doc. 2015-03331 published on March 5, 2015 (80 FR 
11885), make the following correction. On page 11887, in the third 
column, correct the last full paragraph of the document to read as 
follows: Accordingly, the interim rule amending 33 CFR part 165 that 
published at 79 FR 66622 on November 10, 2014, is adopted as a final 
rule without change.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Katia Cervoni,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2015-06174 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
GENERAL ORDERS 

NUMBER 74 

REF ID:A69663 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

Washington 25, D. c. 

U August 19~5 

DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL SJ!iCURI'ff AGENCY 

}fEMBERSHIP FOR 'lllE TEClilHCAL MANAGEMENT BOARD 

SECTION I - RESCISSION 

SECTION II ... APPOJNTMENTS 

SECTION I - RESCISSION 

NSA General Orders Number 81, dated 9 December 1954, as 

amended, is hereby rescinded. 

SECTION II - APPOINTMENTS 

1. Pursuant to paragraphs 1 a.nd 2, Section VI of NSA 

Circular Number 112-2, dated 26 October 1953, NSA Membership 

for the Technical Management Board is announced as follows: 

Member 

Col. J. D. Jones, USAF (Chairman) 

Col. J. J. Davis, USA 

CAPT Arthur Enderlin, USN 

Mr. O. R. Kirby 

Mr. C. c. Corry 

Mr. A. H. Hausman 

Alternate 

Mr. Paul R. Reimers 

CDR G. P. McGinnis, USN 

CDR John A. Skinner, USN 

CAPT James A. Morrison, USN 

Mr. E. B. McGettrick 

Mr. C. R. Sunmers 

• 

2. Mr. T. J. Stratton, COMP, is appointed, without vote, 

to serve as Executive Secretary to this Board. 

BY COMMAND OF LIEUTENANT GENERAL CANJNE: 

OFFICIAL: 

~ GEO. E. CAMP.BELL 

Colonel, AGC 

Adjutant General 

DISTRJBUTION I plus 

JOHN B ACKERMAN 

MaJ_or General~ US M.r Force 

Chief of staf'f' 

Individuals Concerned 

Executive Secretary, TMB (25) 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

Element 

CO.MP 

P/P 

COM 

PROD 

COMSEC 

R/D
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2037 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify the Federal Pell 

Grant duration limits of borrowers who attend an institution of higher 

education that closes or commits fraud or other misconduct, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 

Mrs. BOXER (for herself, Mr. DURBIN, Ms. WARREN, Ms. HIRONO, and Mr. 

MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify 

the Federal Pell Grant duration limits of borrowers who 

attend an institution of higher education that closes or 

commits fraud or other misconduct, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pell Grant Restoration 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2037 IS

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL PELL GRANT DURATION LIMITS. 

2 Section 401(c)(5) of the Higher Education Act of 

3 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(c)(5)) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘The period’’ and inserting ‘‘(A) 

5 Except as provided in subparagraph (B), the pe6 riod’’; and 

7 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(B)(i) Any Federal Pell Grant that a student 

9 received during a period described in subclause (I) 

10 or (II) of clause (ii) shall not count towards the stu11 dent’s duration limits under this paragraph. 

12 ‘‘(ii) Clause (i) shall apply with respect to any 

13 Federal Pell Grant awarded to a student to attend 

14 an institution— 

15 ‘‘(I) during a period— 

16 ‘‘(aa) for which the student received a 

17 loan under this title; and 

18 ‘‘(bb) for which the loan described in 

19 item (aa) is forgiven under— 

20 ‘‘(AA) section 437(c)(1) or 

21 464(g)(1) due to the closing of the in22 stitution; 

23 ‘‘(BB) section 455(h) due to the 

24 student’s successful assertion of a de25 fense to repayment of the loan; or 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2037 IS

1 ‘‘(CC) section 432(a)(6), section 

2 685.215 of title 34, Code of Federal 

3 Regulations (or a successor regula4 tion), or any other loan forgiveness 

5 provision or regulation under this Act, 

6 as a result of a determination by the 

7 Secretary or a court that the institu8 tion committed fraud or other mis9 conduct; or 

10 ‘‘(II) during a period for which the student 

11 did not receive a loan under this title but for 

12 which, if the student had received such a loan, 

13 the student would have qualified for loan for14 giveness under subclause (I)(bb).’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-4256

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES JETER GRIFFITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg,

District Judge. (CR-03-50)

Submitted: September 15, 2004 Decided: October 22, 2004

Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Leslie Carter Rawls, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant.

Gretchen C. F. Shappert, United States Attorney, Thomas R. Ascik,

Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Charles Jeter Griffith seeks to appeal his conviction and

135-month sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of

conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in

violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (2000). On appeal, Griffith

claims that trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance. Finding

no error, we affirm.

Ineffective assistance claims are not generally addressed

on direct appeal unless it appears conclusively from the record

that Appellant received ineffective assistance of counsel. United

States v. Richardson, 195 F.3d 192, 198 (4th Cir. 1999). Such

claims generally should be raised by motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). Id. We conclude Griffith has not shown conclusively from

the face of the record that counsel provided ineffective

representation. Accordingly, we affirm Griffith's conviction

without prejudice to his assertion of ineffective assistance of

counsel claims in a § 2255 proceeding. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### November 25, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r 

### 136957 Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136957 COA: 282935 Wayne CC: 07-007355-01 RALPH WILLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 9, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

d1117 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 25, 2008

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14094-14095]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06271]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-15-2015]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 44--Mount Olive, New Jersey; 
Notification of Proposed Production Activity, Givaudan Fragrances 
Corporation, (Fragrance Compounds), Mount Olive, New Jersey

    Givaudan Fragrances Corporation (Givaudan), an operator of FTZ 44, 
submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ 
Board for its facility located in Mount Olive, New Jersey. The 
notification conforming to the requirements of the regulations of the 
FTZ Board (15 CFR 400.22) was received on March 4, 2015.
    Givaudan already has authority to produce fragrance compounds 
within Site 1 of FTZ 44. The current request would add foreign-status 
materials to the scope of authority. Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), 
additional FTZ authority would be limited to the specific foreign-
status materials and components and specific finished products 
described in the submitted notification (as described below) and 
subsequently authorized by the FTZ Board.
    Production under FTZ procedures could exempt Givaudan from customs 
duty payments on the foreign status materials used in export 
production. On

[[Page 14095]]

its domestic sales, Givaudan would be able to choose the duty rate 
during customs entry procedures that applies to fragrance compounds 
(free) for the foreign status materials noted below and in the existing 
scope of authority. Customs duties also could possibly be deferred or 
reduced on foreign status production equipment.
    The components and materials sourced from abroad include: lactic 
acid salts and esters; tartaric acid salts and esters; and, acridine 
and indole (duty rate ranges from free to 4.4%).
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary at the 
address below. The closing period for their receipt is April 27, 2015.
    A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection 
at the Office of the Executive Secretary, Foreign-Trade Zones Board, 
Room 21013, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., 
Washington, DC 20230-0002, and in the ``Reading Room'' section of the 
FTZ Board's Web site, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Kathleen Boyce at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b103a2f33373e3e3575193422383e1b2f293a3f3e753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c08ba1b4a8aca5a5aeee82afb9a3a580b4b2a1a4a5eea7afb6">[email protected]</span></a> (202) 482-1346.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06271 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000507

17-NOV-2016

08:40 AM
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2158 

To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National Seashore Advisory 

Commission. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2021 

Mr. MARKEY (for himself and Ms. WARREN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization for the Cape Cod National 

Seashore Advisory Commission. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Cape Cod National 

5 Seashore Advisory Commission Reauthorization Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2158 IS

1 SEC. 2. CAPE COD NATIONAL SEASHORE ADVISORY COM2 MISSION. 

3 Effective September 26, 2018, section 8(a) of Public 

4 Law 87–126 (16 U.S.C. 459b–7(a)) is amended in the sec5 ond sentence by striking ‘‘2018’’ and inserting ‘‘2029’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS