alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID:A39277 -,• SEI. ... .- 4 IJZ4::C.'J ; 

'Jb .. i lo~ 

• •

. . .. · - -~ .t' < ~ ,, y . • ·• - . Sociuritr l11hmniititi.1 ,. - ~ ~ 

. ~·. ·. · HEAUQUARTEll,.!, · . ""'#· ·. ·.""~~31~ .... 

, · 

.-

• 

. 

: . ~:·-:· ~. ·, . .. ~,. · -· ..... "°· i ~~-eo~ ENT AIR FORCE WE . ~.~' " ' ir"fi;¥-r..:" ..- COLORADO SPRIN&S, COLORADO 

25 .August 1953 

.... :. . . : ·;,;. Dr .. Howard P. Robertson 

Scien,ific Adv+sory Beta.rd 

National S901lrity Agency 

3801 le'braska Avenue. NW 

Washington, D. C • 

·~· .~. ·' 

~ 

Dear Dr. Robertson: r 

The inclosed 1& a self-explanatol"f brochure which was :f'tlrnished 

'00 aabll l1811ibe~ et the l{B:Jlhington Watah Committee o:n. the occasion of 

it!iJ. Tisi~ to tile .A.1.z:·Detens& CoDID8.nd.. 

' . In view of the interest you expressed during your recent visit 

here I am sure that you will be i:o:terested i'rl knowing of this project 

·· ·. . . .Uui f~ther that the W~tch ·C~ ttee seemed suf'ficiently imp!'eSsttd. -

... : •••• '1· "91~ ~' need tor warning to take some posi-tive action. 

' . 

I ha.Te sent a similar letter to the individual members of the IAC 

and to other selected. individuals who may be abie to guide or assist 

the project by virtue of their posit~ons. 

The sur;:v~y of Alerting Procedures in Intelligence reoelit.~ 

.d4.rec1;ed. b.r t!ie U.C and now being conducted o:.1: ~ ot CIA •. 

1i.t.!l. in my opinion f'Qi:m an· excellent backer · tor w' tever action 

'the Watch Committee. ·may take on the informal ADC staff study. 

Sincerely OGA 

. ' . 

•' 

... . " 

·l Incl 

Staff Study - 1t ImproTed W'arniYJ.r;" 

·.'·:ct tbe u.'1.&.co.:'-A ... ccument. iD \7!.l.J.la1awn 

.... (or not c.ttar:: .. ~·tho r.,ae:s:fico.tion ot 

this Co:::-r. u· .. ::- • : · .. _ , .i~ '° :·.:~gr~dccl to ____ j.,.tf: ___ . i1~ t. ::eordr.:.nce with para. 

25E-AFR 205-l 

W. J4. BtJRGBSS 

Bri~adiar General, US.AF 

DCS/rntelligilnoe 

-Sieur1ty f n ~ 01n1ati6,

1._ 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 09-03-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

" •,
HM-Jiolt -.U<>1 

Docket No.~ 

Regulatory Evaluation 

OloHr.lC-or/'-AiJ 

Directorate Identifier: l'BD AI)4 

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update according(v. ff 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out qfthe changed cell. 

I Cost" 

Action Costs P" , ongino, 

(e.g., Inspection, Work~hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total C~st replacement) 

Do not include on- (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet 

condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

n\ -our) 

I and 

40'o 'll:IAOO.O IM' :'.1 A·-i li.-1110 .0 installation of S},,'IOO.Oii 426 ~. •03 " (I 

TU357 03 0" ll! '\; 1_1.0(} ~$:;'JJ1l S 16.:-->0ll.OO 426 Sri .()''I.!JJOO.U ,. : (I 

_;,w ' .Oil s ,1)(1 ; '-:.. s '-'"' (I .IJIJ ~ s 

) "" -~:/'. ; IJO s (I l.IJO 

·.; (I '"" ,, I, s " (II) 

.. __ .. ·_· s ()IJ I (I I 

s ' ()() s I)IJ ,, . (J(J 

·- s . [l[l $ I I ,_ ),(l(j 

' . s ) I)IJ ' I -'" (j_{l[J 

s 1.00 I, s I s ,,, 

' .. ') .00 s '-''" 5'ci'·. s ) _(Ill 

' (I (II) s . IJ 00_ ',) "-"" 

$ l.IJIJ s Oil . ' S O.I!IJ 

s . IJO (I Ulll s ' \ )_(j() '· IJ. 1)1) ' 

(I "-'"' --c--* -;_ (}(] s 0.0 ;;• I s il.IJU 

, r• ' ) .Oil s ' IS uUI ,. HJII ·," s () (J s ).()('1 

'()() ;·•:.••· s () 00 . o . on 

The known in 0 

Total Costs , for' . fleet $8,477,400 

Costs' I under· •(: $0 

1 Costs' 

Action Laborcost Parts Cost Cost per 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close~ replacement) . up) 

,(111 '•'' •. i 

> liU ll ., 

',' )_()(l \ ' ' 

_1 "-'"' -.· ·1!\2: ... " ., ) 

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?-

YES' 0 NO [21 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? (liJ 

YES* 0 NO [21 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer .• 

YES D N0[2J 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES' 0 NO [21 

*Explanation:
REF ID:A54944 

SECRET 

J ICY S4 

.. , 

l1BBCT1 hcur1t¥ ~\• tr:zr Operation v.tm:AM 

TOI Cb.1et or •nl OperaUona (Op-)0) 

~~ 

llhrancea ClfO l~, 0012.51'30, StlbJecti lecur11;.¥ 

a.quir8IHllteJ OperaUon \.'.lCWAM, 4td 18 oot 1954 

1. tou:r nquirClatlt tor •cur• cipb;)n.J equ1paent, ap.eUi- eall1' the il'S.l'f *81 tor uae in oonnecUon 1dtb Operation \.'ltiWAM 

ha1 been oaratWl)' con11dored.. ..,_.itmc. baa dez::on•trat&d t.hat 

v. application or u,per.1.Mntal, deYwlopuntalt or e.ttneer~ 

-491• of eq,uip1tmt to wt eperat..1.onel nquiretlent• la 110t in 

tho bl•t. bt.w•n ot •tloMl •cur1t,;. TUretore, I heft adopted 

• JJ011o,y to the effect. tlaat aper!Mntal, daftlopiental or 911(1-

N«rina *>481• or aquipant.a -.d1l not be ~ •'t'all•bl• to .. t 

nqulrement1 of u opc"&tional m.tUl"•· 

... 'Iba nquellted .AroAt DI08 dphony equipraent •• 'Wt1l •• 

.t.h«r YJl1' oipbony equip!181lt• 'Which ai&ht. .. t 1DY1" r-.uirement, 

a-. in n.rlows .-ta&•• t4 d.evel.oi:aent aJ>4 baT• not bMn approved tor operational ua. .lcaordl:oi:l,y, I cannot proY14• the 1qu4'cent 

J'OU nqueated tor ue 1n Operation \IIG\l.A.H. Po:r pl111n1ng pui-po .. e, 

it 1• prwentl.7 ••t2.-.ted tl:i.at p:od.uoUon model• ot such equipM1nt vll1 be aw.Uabl.a 1D approxhlatel,y tw (2) pare .. 

. \ 

.- :II ' 

'?\ 

~ Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
STANDARD P"Ol'tM No. I o4A 

Al'PllOYID IT Tifl' l'llEllDPT 

MARCH 10, 1121 • 

TELEGRAM OFFl~~~SINESS GOVERNMENT RATES 

. ·. -~'r (\, 

• 

December 9, 1941 • 

/!!:- iltaiiALS PHILIPPINE DEPARTl.!ENT llANILA PI 

~ CURRENT DIRECTIVE MONITORING STATION IS REVOKED STOP lm1 DIRECTIVE IS TO 

ti COVER ALL JAPANE.5E .ARM! TRAmc POSSIBLE STOP SELECT BF.ST COPIES OF l&SSAG~ 

AND FORWARD AS MUCH AS PQSSIBLE IN SYSTEM THIRTEEN S'I\>P FORWARD REMAIND!R OF 

TRAFFIC BY FASTEST AVAILABLE MEANS RETAINING COPI~:S IN EVENT SHTPMENT LOST 

COLTON ACTING 

e.&••--mn....-.... 

!Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-06-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§ 
• 8ear~ REFRv\PhbA' 8&51 • 

C

·h. f c::,: nnl f~..,.., R DEPARTMENT 

ie ' ' IORITY 

• 

STANDARD FORM NO. I.CA 

APPROVED BY TttE PltHIDENT 

fllARCtt 10, ltzt 

TELEGRAM 

/;;;J1s, , 1 J~~o--5li:~~~~.~~~1------------------------3--·-- ........ ~-

OFFICl~~SINESS GOVERNMENT RATES 

. · ~ . ·f' '?" 

~ ""'' SIGNALS ' PHILIPPINE DEPARTI.iENT UANILA PI 

~ - CURRENT DIRECTIVE YONITORING STATION IS REVOXED STOP NE'tJ DIRECTIVE IS TO 

k 

December 9, 1941 • 

COVER ALL JAPANESE ARMY TRAFFIC POSSIBLE STOP SELECT BEST COPIES OF !.""'~S \~}'.'"'S 

AND FORWARD AS MUCH AS POSSIRLr.: IN SYSTEM THIRTEETI S ?,lP FORWARD REMJ.PlER OF 

TRAFFIC BY FASTEST AVAILAPLE MEANS RETAINING COPIES IN E'lENT SHTPMENT LOST 

GOLTOU ACTING 

.............. T ...............
1 The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 10-1439

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Leroy Laron Eason, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: August 23, 2010 Filed: August 23, 2010

___________ Before LOKEN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Federal inmate Leroy Eason appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his motion to compel the government to move for a post-conviction sentence reduction. After careful review, we find the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Eason’s motion, because he did not meet his burden of showing that the government’s refusal to move for a sentence reduction was premised on an unconstitutional motive-2- or was not rationally related to a legitimate government end. See United States v. Marks , 244 F.3d 971, 975 (8th Cir. 2001). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________
# m

- - - _C I T Y O ¥ ^ ^



# KlRKSVJLL E Administratio n660.627.122 5 • Huma nResource s 660.627.145 8 Economi c & Communit y Developmen t 660.627.122 4

Ma y17 , 201 0 Mr . Denni s DeVany , Chie fj Essentia l Ai rServic e & Domesti cAnalysi s E j Departmen t o fTransportation , Roo m 640 1 § 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 Dea rMr . DeVany : RE : Optio n t o remov e 15-Sea t Passenge rRequiremen t Th e Kirksvill e Cit yCouncil , a t thei rregula rmeetin g o fMa y17 , 2010 , vote d t o op t ou t o f th e 15-sea t requiremen t tha t i s currentl yunde rth e essentia l ai rservic e guidelines . I n addition , th e Cit yo fKirksvill e ha s spen t tim e reviewin g an d evaluatin g proposal s submitte d b yth e variou s ai rcarriers . Unde ra separat e cover , w e wil l shar e ou r recommendation s t o th e Unite d State s Departmen t o fTransportation . W e greatl yappreciat e you rsuppor t an d assistance . Sincerely , Tod d Kuhn s Mayo r da h PC : Airpor t an d Transportatio n Commissio n Davi d Hall , Kirksvill e Regiona l Airpor t

20 1 S . Frankli n• Kirksville , Missour i 6350 1 Tol l Free : 888.299.122 3 • Fax : 660.665.094 0 • www.kirksvillecity.co m
I 

I . 

------·-·----- - - -· 

0 REF ID:A41489(J 

Colonel Georg~ Fabyan, 

Riverbank Laboratories, 

G·eneva, Illinois. 

l~y dear Colonel Fabyan 

6_, July 1919. 

I am particular!y glad to have had the 

opportunity of availing-myself of your hospitality because of 

your kindness in showing me your method of attacking and 

breaking the A T & T Cipher Printing Telegraph syet'em. Your 

metnoda a.nd the t~st messages from which you-arrived a.t your 

r~·Hul ts are, to my way of thinking, sound in theory and 

pre.ct ice, and I thlnk that your reeul ts should be brought to 

the notice of the War Department in:mediately. 

You will, r trust, not consider it a breach of confidence 

for me to make my ovm 'eport to the Chief Signal Officer for, 

as you know, I waa closely in touch with thia work whilst on 

active service. ,, 

I beg to remain, 

' Faithfully ~ours, 

. --------

) 

- @'pp roved for Release by NSA on O 1-26-2015 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

,-

!· 

'_,.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the Form 10-Q and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000353203
<NAME> SUMMIT BANCSHARES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,976,407
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       9,608,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            13,622,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       9,705,449
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         9,790,000
<LOANS>                                     50,724,723
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,090,452
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              91,339,181
<DEPOSITS>                                  78,884,388
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            670,603
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,751,067
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,033,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              50,724,723
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              4,224,082
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,231,428
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             5,455,510
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,428,693
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,428,693
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        4,026,817
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  165,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,506,503
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,758,298
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,758,298
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,017,551
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.93
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0<F1>
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                173,409
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,024,922
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,090,452
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,090,452
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>Not contained in document.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 15

Fleming Companies, Inc.
1945 Lakepointe Drive, Box 299013
Lewisville, Texas 75029

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Fleming Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the 12-week and
40-week periods ended October 6, 2001, and September 30, 2000, as indicated in
our report dated October 24, 2001; because we did not perform an audit, we
expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 12 weeks ended October 6, 2001, is
incorporated by reference in the following:

         (i)      Registration Statement No. 2-98602 (1985 Stock Option Plan) on
                  Form S-8;

         (ii)     Registration Statement No. 33-36586 (1990 Fleming Stock Option
                  Plan) on Form S-8;

         (iii)    Registration Statement No. 33-56241 (Dividend Reinvestment and
                  Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-3;

         (iv)     Registration Statement No. 333-11317 (1996 Stock Incentive
                  Plan) on Form S-8;

         (v)      Registration Statement No. 333-28219 (Associate Stock Purchase
                  Plan) on Form S-8;

         (vi)     Registration Statement No. 333-80445 (1999 Stock Incentive
                  Plan) on Form S-8;

         (vii)    Registration Statement No. 333-89375 (Consolidated Savings
                  Plus and Stock Ownership Plan) on Form S-8;

         (viii)   Registration Statement No. 333-40660 (Dividend Reinvestment
                  and Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-3;

         (ix)     Registration Statement No. 333-40670 (2000 Stock Incentive
                  Plan) on Form S-8;

         (x)      Registration Statement No. 333-60176 (Shelf Registration of
                  Common Stock Maintained on behalf of U.S. Transportation, LLC,
                  an affiliate of The Yucaipa Companies LLC.) on Form S-3; and

         (xi)     Registration Statement No. 333-60178 (5.25% Convertible Senior
                  Subordinated Notes Due 2009 and Shares of Common Stock
                  Issuable upon Conversion of the Notes) on Form S-3.


We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of a registration statement
prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an
accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Dallas, Texas
November 12, 2001
•• t :A-§!12 ~ 

MEMO ROUTING SLl ~f-1 ~.iiit-u.;;:; ;!'!'ROYALS, DISAPPROVALS, 

I'" CURRENCES, OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

1 NAME OR TITLE 

Col. S-.ra ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION 

Chier • .AFSA~ 

2 

Capt. Harper 

Chief, AFSA...02 

3 

4 

REMARKS 

INITIALS 

DATE 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

we recently made SOlll!t changes in AFSA Organizaticnal 

Manual in regard to the mchania for studying and 

insuring aecurit7 of .AFSA •a om ooDlll\lllications. 

Dave these changes been e.ttective? 'What ia preaeut 

aituatim in regard to the modificat.t.ona in systems and/ or procedures required to increase securit,-7 

FROM NAME OR TITLE DATE 

14 .Apr 52 ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION f: 0 !'' E' ULT f; N TELEPHONE 

ro d for relea e b SA on 05-19-2014 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Forin 8115, 1 Apr 48, and AFHQ -111--.114117-4 GPO -k 

I FEB 50 Fonn 12. 10 Nov 47, which may bo used. 
REF ID:A5'1283 

~~~ _,I 'Ji:d'/ 

SE:Ch:i:T 

!!!!!! • neuam mO!llM'ftOX 

Chiet, Ccm11W1icat1on• 

Dlv1a1oo. 

lecur1 t7 ot AFSA C<llDf'J? CO'lllll-ln1crt.t1ona 

17 kF 52 

l.. Aa an altenati"Ye to eeta'blish:lna a pro.posed AFSA CClllIOO lleviev Board, 

the toUowing a441 tiona were 9a4e to the .A1SA llanual~ Organisation at1d l"Unctiour 

wr~cal Consultants Grgup.., Ottice ot OperatioDll 

Pap 53, Pu"qrapli 7) 

"Collaborates and coortlinates 41rectl.J' vi th the .Anal.)'81s and Bvaluat1on D1via1on ot the Ott1ce or Cammu.nicat1on 

leeurity llll4 tbe c._..mscat1ou D1Yia:f.ou ae required on 

satters ot -.&tual eoncern and apecUical.q on the a4equac7 

an4. •ec1U'1 tJ' o~ A1SA CClllllWlication•." •:I.• and Bval.uation Di:v1•1on, Of':t:lce ot OEEC 

age §0&, hiaar&iii 21) 

•coorcu.nates aa4 collaborates directly vith the Techn1cal 

Conaultanta Group ot the otf'ice ot Operations an4 the Ccaiun1-

cat1ona :O.f:vuion u reqU1red on -.ttera ot aitual concern and 

gecifi.c~ OD the adeQ.U&cJ" and eecurl't-1" ot A'l'SA CCIDIQ'lcat:lons.'' 

I!. 81-ce the :l.Jr.pl.ementation or the aboTe c:.ba1'J&es, baa the coor41nat1on and 

collaboration ~en 1n tbi• JIB.Dller been m adaquate •ub•t1tut1on tor the 

Jl'OpOSed A7SA C~ Jlertev Joe.rc1t What 18 currentq being 4one to 1Dllure the 

•ecuritT ot ow ccxt1IT ecaiinieationaT · 

.A.a. Wenger 

Mr. rr1ea.an40 

d 

2 

Wet, Ottice ot CtJl3iC 

Cb:let 1 ottice ot Operation• 

~sgd) Mired a. MarGJ 

mun a. JIARCI 

Colonel, Signal Corps 

eh:let or Sta.ff 

SECRET --- -------
99-224.

#### Karr v. Borchardt.

Seneca App. No. 13-98-34. Discretionary appeal allowed; *sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 99-219, 99-222, and 99-223, *supra.*

Lundberg Stratton, J.,

would allow on Propositions of Law Nos. I, II, and III and hold this cause for the decision in 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618, *Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos.,*Franklin App. No. 98AP-353.

*1406Cook, J.,

would hold this cause for the decision in 99-342, 99-348 and 99-618, *Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos.,*Franklin App. No. 98AP-353.
Exhibit 10.4

 

AMENDMENT NUMBER 2
 TO
 THE MACERICH COMPANY
 2005 DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
 FOR SENIOR EXECUTIVES

 

WHEREAS, The Macerich Company (the “Company”) has established and maintains The Macerich Company 2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Senior Executives (the “Plan”) to provide supplemental retirement income benefits through deferrals of salary and bonuses for certain Senior Executives (as defined in the Plan); and

 

WHEREAS, the Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”), and Section 10.4 of the Plan allows for the amendment or addition of Plan provisions relating to elections as to the time and manner of distributions so long as they comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code; and

 

WHEREAS, Treasury Regulations and Internal Revenue Service guidance under Section 409A of the Code promulgated since the adoption of the Plan allow for the acceleration of payments to persons other than Participants pursuant to certain domestic relations orders; and

 

WHEREAS, the Company has determined that it is appropriate and desirable to amend the Plan to permit payments pursuant to domestic relations orders in a manner that complies with such regulations and guidance.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as set forth below, effective May 1, 2011.

 

ARTICLE I
 TITLE AND DEFINITIONS

 

1.               Section 1.2 of the Plan is amended by the addition of definitions of new defined terms “Alternate Payee” and “Domestic Relations Order,” which shall read as follows:

 

“Alternate Payee” shall mean a spouse, former spouse, child or other dependent of a Participant, who has the right to receive all or a portion of the Participant’s Accounts under this Plan pursuant to a Domestic Relations Order.

 

“Domestic Relations Order” shall mean a “domestic relations order” as such term is defined in Section 414(p)(1)(B) of the Code.

 











 

ARTICLE VI
 DISTRIBUTIONS

 

2.               Article VI of the Plan is amended by adding a new Section 6.5 thereto, to read as follows:

 

6.5                                 Domestic Relations Order.

 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 6.1(b) and 6.3 hereof, an Alternate Payee may receive payment of all or any portion of a Participant’s Accounts at such time and in such form (from among those set forth in Section 6.1 or in an immediate lump sum payment) as may be specified in or elected in accordance with a Domestic Relations Order.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officers to execute this amendment this 6th day of May, 2011.

 

	
 
    	
THE   MACERICH COMPANY
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By   
    	
/s/   Stephanie P. Corcoran
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, : No. 2236 Disciplinary Docket No. 3
Petitioner > No. 217 DB 2015

: Attorney Registration No. 93501
Vv. :
: (Delaware County)
JOHN ANTHONY COSTALAS :

Respondent

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17 day of November, 2016, upon consideration of the
Recommendation of the Three-Member Panel of the Disciplinary Board, the Joint
Petition in Support of Discipline on Consent is granted. Respondent John Anthony
Costalas is suspended on consent from the Bar of this Commonwealth for a period of
two years. He shall comply with all the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217.

Respondent shall pay the costs incurred by the Disciplinary Board in the

investigation and prosecution of this matter.