alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.... ,,. .. --t I ,.. 

f ~ I 0 'It:: • 4o 

.. 

··'I 

- .. _;_f:A _ .. l"f o:u 

. S-o 0 - . "C.t1M5 ·---..... -------~ ..................... --~.--~-~---.-

, 

.. )... 0 () #' 1iv5 o-"'O . 

.. ... ... ,- (Fi) -------· -~..,,_ ~ --- - .. 

;> I 'f rra !'~ .. . , 

1.111- i;,g () .. , 

/ ) " .,- . . , ' I ,."!-. • . ,. , .,,, .. • J {r'b 

, . •:3__'3. ,,-0 ...,--

~I t'i1 ~> /"' Co( ------------.--""--------------- ,..,.._ ________________ _ ' 

-7 <'-.:..."..!:....!:.. ~----~!::{;_;!! ___ __ _ .. _ ......... I _ .. _____ .,. __ _ ---L-=--- --- --... __ -- --------- - -- --- ~ -:""-

t1ll a , -. -· ->---~-·-"-=--__.....,, .--/,._..\..-.,.,.._ __________________ . 

• 

·-

--,--

fi1 f'D 

.. W'- _J,:;!- . 

' ""---- -____ . ,.. __ ~---

.... 

\ 

rj• fl 

-·------..-,---------- - ~--..--;.-. ___ } --

.• 

-=--------... ----............... - ------~---------- --~ .... --------------:--r-----....--..___ -- ' • 

.. 

.. 

.. . 

___ .. ________ _ 

... . . 

• 

..,;:.r 

, 

, 

,. ,. 

.. roved for Release b NSA on 06-03-2014 

' I 

• 

ursuantto E .0. 1352
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">206 West 121st Street HDFC, Petitioner-Landlord-Appellant,<br><br>against<br><br>Shirley Jones, Respondent-Tenant-Respondent.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Landlord appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jack Stoller, J.), dated April 8, 2016, which granted tenant's motion to dismiss the petition in a holdover summary proceeding and denied landlord's cross motion, in effect, to reargue a prior order (same court and Judge) which denied landlord's motion to dismiss tenant's second defense and for interim use and occupancy.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Order (Jack Stoller, J.), dated April 8, 2016, insofar as appealable, reversed, with $10 costs, tenant's motion to dismiss the petition denied, and the petition reinstated.</p><p>Tenant's motion to dismiss the underlying holdover proceeding should have been denied. Landlord was not required to serve a notice of termination, either under the provisions of the lease or pursuant to Real Property Law § 232-a, since the fixed term of the lease expired and the tenancy was unregulated (<i>see Adams v City of Cohoes</i>, 127 NY 175, 182-183 [1891]; <i>Yettaben Realty, LLC v Hae Sook Nam</i>, NYLJ, December 8, 1999, at 26, col 1 [App Term, 1st Dept 1999]; 2 Dolan, Rasch's Landlord and Tenant—-Summary Proceedings § 30:15 [4th ed 1998]). There is no indication that any month-to-month tenancy was ever created and landlord commenced the proceeding promptly upon expiration of the lease. </p><p>In addition, the holdover petition alleged a cause for eviction other than the mere expiration of tenant's lease (<a href="../2007/2007_27423.htm" target="_blank"><i>see Matter of Volunteers of Am.-Greater NY, Inc. v Almonte</i>, 17 Misc 3d 57</a> [2007], <i>affd</i> 65 AD3d 1155, 1157-1158 [2009]; <a href="../2009/2009_51473.htm" target="_blank"><i>80 St. Nicholas Ave. HDFC v Lewis</i>, 24 Misc 3d 134</a>[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 51473[U] [App Term, 1st Dept 2009]; <i>Hudsonview Terrace v Maury</i>, 100 Misc 2d 331, 333 [App Term, 1st Dept 1979]; <i>see generally 512 E. 11th St. HDFC v Grimmet</i>, 181 AD2d 488, 489 [1992], <i>appeal dismissed</i> 80 NY2d 892 [1992]) - i.e., that tenant engaged in numerous acts of specified objectionable conduct. Thus, the due process requirement for notice at this stage of the proceeding was satisfied.</p><p>The portion of the underlying order denying reargument of landlord's prior motion is not appealable.</p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><p>I concur I concur I concur</p><br>Decision Date: November 22, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
**Chapter 391 -**  **3 -**  **1 Rules for A** **ir Quality Control** 



### CLEA **N COPY OF THE**  **RULES FOR A IR QUA**  **LITY CONTROL**

**CHA PTER 391**  **- 3**  **- 1**  **PERT AI**  **NING TO RULE .15, “TRA**  **NSPORTA TION CONFIRMITY”** 

Rule 391 - 3 - 1 - .15, **"Transportation Conformity ,"**  is being added to read as follows: **391 -**  **3 -**  **1 -**  **.15 Transportation Conformity .**  The crite ria and procedures specified in the “Transportation Conformity Manual” dated April 15, 2010, implement the requirements of Section 176(c)(4)(E) of the Clean Air Act for state implementation plans to include criteria and procedures for consultation, enforce ment, and enforceability with respect to the conformity of transportation plans, programs, and projects developed, funded or approved under Title 23 United States Code (23 U.S.C.) or the Federal Transit Laws to the applicable implementation plan. Autho rity: O.C.G.A. Section 12 - 9 - 1 et seq., as amended.
# C_2014154EN.01000201.xml

| 22.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 154/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 154/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7256 — KKR/HIG/Estro)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 154/02

On 16 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in the English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7256. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7256. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
-~ 

.. REF ID:A522194 ' 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

SIGNAL CORPS LABORATORIES OPP'ICE OP THE OPPICER IN CHARGE 

IN REPLY REFER TO 

Mr. William Friedman 

Cipher Department 

Office Chief Signal Officer 

Washington, DiiC. 

My dear Friedman: 

FORT MONMOUTH 

OCEANPORT, NEW JERSEY 

Febr'lE.ry 20, 1931. 

We are working on the light field printer as fast as circumstances 

will permit. A small portable typewriter has been procured, mm.ecessary 

details r~oved, and contacts being provided as a first step. A motor, 

· lamps, etc. are being purchased and it is believed satisfactory progress 

w.i.11 be made shortly. · 

In order that certain preliminary details may be worked out, it 

is requested that you mail me,personally, several circular, celluloid, cipher 

~es. One of these should be the 26 letters of the alphabet in sequence, 

the others may be any cipher combination which you may think best. 

As you no doubt will recall, our original plans 1'91' the contact 

combimtia'ls on the cipher disk itself' consisted of the contacts mounted in 

diameters across the two faces which total 338 contacts for the .1x>p and 338 

contacts for the bottom. The bridge arm brushes which work upon these contacts 

would :llornber 26 above and 26 below. Under these circumstances and with every 

possible sequence of' Wiring, it seems that the number at possibilities f'or any 

given letter upon depressing a key would be 13. .Another method bas been 

suggested of' simply placing 26 contacts about a circumference top and bottom 

of' the disk. With these contacts intemired as per attached sketch, and with 

26 upper and 26 lower brush· contacts, the number of' possibilities for any 

given letter seems again to be 13. Inasmuch as a disk with simply 26 contacts 

upper and lower is considerably easier to manuf'acture.:tb.an one with 338 contacts uppe~ ahd lower, alid inasmuch as the number of possibilities seems to·be the 

same, it is desirous that these disk~ be made in the simpler manner unless you 

have some objection. 

All other details are essentially the same and an early reply from 

you on the above is requested. 

Very sincerely yours, 

1 Incl. - Sketch. 

NSA on· 11-21-2013 ursuant to E.O. 1352 
CoA/T"'9CT Vlt.1e//\/6 Fo.rc:::. · 

::V~6K "f. 

-e 
0 

0 

• REF ID:A522194 • 

- - -·"- ______ ,,. __ 

0 

Zb /eA:z:>~/ or /.3 

Ct:1NrAcr.s EAC N 

q 

B
• 

-· 

• REF ID:A105154j 

RECf..UHJ 

WAR DEPARTMENT . . 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 1'324 JUL 28 PM 2 o

-----DIVl810N WA8HINGTON 7 

PROPOSAL FOR SECRECY IN THE JENKINS . RADIO PICTURE SYSTEM 

In order to achieve secrecy in transmission and reception 

ot intelligence by means or the Jenkins Radio Picture System. I 

propose· the following scheme: I I ~ 

1. A photographic negative ot any complicated 

desi5n,written or printed matter. etc., hereinafter termed the 

11 key' is to be placed in tront of the photograph or message to be 

transmitted. The .first mentioned photographic negative or"key may 

be as complex in pattern as desirable, the more complex the better. 

The material actually transmitted will then be a resultant of the 

superimposition o:t the 11key" upon the 11 plain text" or original 

material. only those portions of the original which are not blocked 

out by the blackened portions ot the 11 key11 being transmitted. 

2. At the receiving end• a positive print of the 

photographic "key" plate is inserted between the light beam and the 

recording paper. The light beam is so actuated as to be continuously 

operative, but when an impulse is received, it is out out o:t action. 

Thus there wi_ll result a "negative record" of the original material. 

5. It may be necessary to have a supplement.ary 

light beam at the receiving end which is actuated in synchronism with 

the present receiving light beam; 'the supplementary light beam passes 

through the 11key11 • and then impinges upon the received record; thus 

supplying at the receiving end those portions which were blocked out 

at the t.ransmitting end. 

4. It may be better to place the positive of the 

"key" at the transmitt.ing end and the negat.ive at the receiving end. 

or it may be possible to arrange tor a positive key at both ends, or 

a negative key at both ends. 

WITNESSES: 

~?-~ Or;yptanalyst. s.c. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
. , 

\ 

.. C) "REF lD:A414B~B 

u 

Aftfl· Bl'l@.$4$, 1'0• se..-~.ee~ B:rlgaAlei-oGenenl ;»ewlt:ng ~omma:aat.mS, 111 maroh. 

~'"1Sll8 G8Jlflr.1 .Ol'4~ llo .• ~· ri~ee4 ta 

.ValllDl,r· oter a10ll8 ~··-lit• 6 -to liJ'a"107• At.._,. '~i.a ' ' 

11Jt~pa,.mh ~- u._. 15rt~e1""4~ sr•_ aaa JWtQh 

to 1'$111.81'~ a~aas rOIJt~ itoie th 'Bl~ .at polilt fl•e r.dles 

' . eae- Qf fUU.en 01ti west· ba1* of ON,ek, Atta$ the. ~ 

1• -.. .. ftnt two lines~ set m eb &pu$es. Betw•n .. t•oes two spaoee are allowed•· 

. a.. aere· seem to. -tr• e.nora a• tbfee. »0tats1 

-· Line ~· MM l$ s,.led ·£m!M 

·bl t.lae 'Ii .!! 1$ s"lle4 g& •. 

"Cit L.iae &s .tSetore A$tr!fS 1 get.-J! -.net~ 

·ot •• . 

1 FO~ the• G1"$ ne '-o oa~es~& bi tnblg• 

1 s. 1 OaimOt ,... ,.,. U'1e R. of J1211 lll 1lae 1.. oeo•uut' mu~ Bo• a· &tope "' trJa• 110~t, -'1t the· .au_,,, ot oOUfee· 

qui ta ~rta~; · ! 

-. 

@:pproved for Release bv NSA on 12-03-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352EJ . ) . 

;
, ' '~ 

• 

Olatl.1- oE Plu12"aUcm • e.. W'Uli• 1. Fri.-..U, Coualtat.. Am.1 ,.._ Seet.r.l\7 A,,,..,,. &~ .... Saooal AJ!RRJ ~ S.tilr'it.,. OftJ.••·· Ceat--• to .. w at 8Jtoeks ilr ,... aw. J-7 MuWt 1952. 

l.... ~Vactuctor;r Nlariri. 

t. Cl.- ~\i..cnstdp ~ e....aS•t1•s •tllV'ltr (COllS!C) and 

<»1•naSoa\t.cma in.tel u...., (OOMDt) 

;. ~otcamrr-~~) 

"· DafiJd.U... arid ~eot.tw. or COMINTJ lind.t.&'4.CIUI iapuld .,. 81Dar.l\7 

aondd..U.aas 

s. ~ td.rio27 or ezntololr 

a. Anc:l.at an! .u'Ji' c~log 

ta. Begtnntnp ot md111n OJ.7ptolea 

e. Per18l GE ~ 8lmllilut41Mr7 dJQll 

cl. Tbe u. s. C1Yil v.. perloc1 

.. The per.tod et d.ecl.!•· 136.s-ins 

5. CrJptoJ.oa dv.IJI& Wodd war I 

.. .. em iD mU.it;ar.r OIF Tl m1oat.Sans and ita e.ftaot.s OD CJ:7Pt.ol.OIJ 

b,. T..U.al. .,._ lllt4 b7 V. be)l ig..U 

o. ~u. aid ~ aUi\&17 .,. ... t 

1.. u. s. Gl'JP\Glofd.o alt.llat&-. bm. 1920 w Pearl. HarbW 

&. ~of ~O MCtd.._,. .IA t.he U. S .... Ml1Md 

la. J>91Nlq nrrt ot ·~ ••l'ldn• aad ilMm" sJ.gnt ftoaak 

.r.reota • ~ wllf:4e ornt.olo&l• tialL 

.. • ..... ~ epi.,. 11t, ot CCJillft 

a. The au~ but. llllw.1.t.t-. h1stiel7 of; .S.U.'-7 opeat.IAU 

a. W.14 W.- I epl.._ a. au.a....,,_,. war igqo 

ct. .......... of Pearl lldMr ~t.ima 

.. ~ OtlftupwlOJ'le 

'• Le&SaU.. appuit, requiNcl for a 8'*111t'4 CCllIIT orpd...U.. Lor t.oUJ 

10.. c......u.au. Gt COMIN'f open.t.J.cma Vita. tlldloal ~ md 'V1oe ---

ll. s.om-J.tf' ~tor ~- ot __.. 

JL 

V£jpproved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
REF 

BR! 

JIEVO!ANDUH FOR .AFSA-OOB 

8UBJ'EOT1 Crypto-Seeurit7 ot APSA COIIll1Unieat1ons 

J.FSA-00%/et 

26 April 1951 

l. I qree with AP'SA-0'2 that the Crypto-Secur1t7 ot JlSA Cammtmicationa ahould be under continuous er periodic acrutin,yf but I agree with 

Al'SA-OOB that thie ehould be done h1" .Al'SA-ol+, u a matter ot assigned 

naponaibilit;r, rather than b7 the creation ot another panel t.11.' committee. 

I eleo agree with A:tSA-02 that u.ain& JUNERVA (ASAK 2-1) tar purposes 

other than to:rwarding or raw 1.ntel"cept tratfie presents a potential danger. 

a. I cannot concur in the statement that d ta1 !ntelliaenee will be cleaned through tra.ttic ana.ll'*ia of cCUINT cil"Ouita. 1be Ru.aaiana know 

tu1l well we an intercepting their canmunicationa just a• n know that 

they are intel"cept.ing aura. EYer,y radio •ta ti on i• a potential intercept 

at.ation and. ite potentialities are 1ri direct proportion to ita aize. 

Ti-attic anafy'aie of COMINi' circruita can onl.7 give unimportant neg4t1V• intormation1 certain radio •tationa are not forwarding intercept traffic 

Y1a radio. It does not indicate that the •tation could not be wwed tor 

intercept pu.rpoeea 1n the tuture ar .might not be forwarding intercept 

•terial by means other than radio. Trattio anal.7a111 will give cont'irmati.On. ot tacts whioh the Ruseie• already well know, but this 111 neither 

Tital nor part.icul&rlT detrimental to either >.FSA or the United Sta.tea .. 

J. 1'he preae1ng need ot the moment appears to be reetr1cting the 

CCICIHT uee ot MIRERVA (ASAM 2-1) to the tonrardi.ng ot raw intercept 

aaterial and providing other eyatema far dail.7 coverage reports, order• 

and inutruotione .tram AFSA, tranelations,. etc.. JilINERVA, or course, could 

be u.aed tor re-enceyption ot the latter. Aleo, one-time encryption ashould 

be introduced in the .rorwarding ot raw intercept material it not already' 

in uae. 

L. F.. BAFFORD Capt~!_ USM 

AfSA-OOX 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

\ -

\.
Court of Appeals of

the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17E0011. PENN v. PENNYMAC CORP, et al.

PennyMac Corp. has filed an “Emergency Motion to Dismiss Un-Docketed Appeal as

Untimely and Frivolous.” PennyMac seeks to invoke this Court’s emergency jurisdiction over this

matter in order to stop “delaying execution on a valid writ of possession” scheduled for November

15, 2016. Consideration of this matter on an emergency basis is not necessary to preserve our

jurisdiction of the undocketed appeal or to prevent any contested issue from becoming moot. See

Court of Appeals Rule 40 (b). Accordingly, the motion is hereby DENIED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

11/08/2016

November 08, 2016
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 1643** 

In R e: ALEXANDER OTIS MATTHEWS , Petitioner
.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
. (1:11

- cr - 00087

- LO

- 1; 1:11

- cr - 00348

- LO

- 1; 1:12

- cv - 00132

- LO)

Submitted : October 13, 2016 Decided: October 17, 2016

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion
. Alexander Otis Matthews, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Alexander Matthews petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion after remand . He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We fin d the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperism , de ny Matthews’ motion for recusal and judicial notice , and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would

n ot aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2251 

To expand support for law enforcement officers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. HAWLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To expand support for law enforcement officers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXPANDING SUPPORT FOR LAW ENFORCE4 MENT OFFICER FAMILY SERVICES, STRESS 

5 REDUCTION, AND SUICIDE PREVENTION. 

6 Section 1001(a)(21) of title I of the Omnibus Crime 

7 Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 

8 10261(a)(21)) is amended by striking ‘‘$7,500,000’’ and 

9 inserting ‘‘$12,500,000’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 99.2**

**AUDITORS' REPORT TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES**

Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report to the shareholders dated January
24, 2003, appearing in the 2002
Annual Report on Form 10-K also included an audit of the financial statement schedule II listed in Item 15 (a) 2 of this Form
10-K.  In our
opinion, the financial statement schedule represents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read
in conjunction
with the related consolidated financial statements.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP                              Ottawa, Canada

Chartered Accountants                              January 24, 2003
/' 

I , 

' I 

/ 

\ 

,, 

.l 

REF ID:A4148919 

O_ • J _Q_ 

J M 14 

April 12, 1919. 

Oapta1n J. A. P0\'11811, 

30 E. lllth Place, . Chicago, Ill. 

Ja\V dear Captain Powell, 

Colonel FabJan'a.olalm that he has demonstrated 

the iD.aeourit7 of the ~. and T. cipher is laugb.ablJ' absUl'd. 

He has· me:rel7 deoiphered two messages written with the same 

rmmlng key-a task Which aught not to take more than a few· 

d&7s at most. These were so far froin being test massages 

that Mr. Gher&rdl, in sending them, said: "I have no doubt 

that you oan decipher Bos. 2, 3, and perhaps .4. These, however, .as .YOU mideratand, are not· the arrangement Which we 

propos~." 

As to message No.· 4--'llllhich apparently has not been 

solved-the deoiphermnt of that is merely a matter 0,f DB-. 

ohanloal ~bor. It ~oa.ld probably take one man warking alone 

a couple of dqs to do 1 t but · it is after all a problem of 

Which one can say, ",the solution .ls oertainly attainable." 

until ColdD8l Fabyan has deciphered 11'9ssage 1, 5, 

6, or 7, he has not even made ·a beginning at demonstrating 

the insecur! ty of the T. and T. sys tam. · 

mew 

Yours ver.v tl"llly, 

- ' 

John -Me Manly 

Captain, u. s. A. 

, . 

\ 

'-

,, 

, @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~__:~~~~_J
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          18,295
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    112,764
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           112,764
<LOANS>                                        212,076
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 370,008
<DEPOSITS>                                     300,613
<SHORT-TERM>                                    31,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,856
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        21,462
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 370,008
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,403
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                7,013
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   885
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                27,301
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,179
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,273
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           20,028
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  52
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 13,372
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,326
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,326
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,939
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.41
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    .064
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,098
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,871
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      115
<RECOVERIES>                                       260
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,726
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,726
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>