alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on a nd i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by 9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l y c onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. ZAI RA EL I ZABE TH CORONEL, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50128 D . C . N o . 3 : 1 0 - c r - 0 1 5 8 1 - D MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D a na M . S abr a w , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r13, 2012 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T R O T T , a n d W . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it J u d g e s . Z ai raE l i zabeth C oron el appeal s f rom the 12 0-m on th sent ence i m po se d f ol l ow i ng he rgui l ty - pl e a c onvi c t i on f ori m por t a t i on of

c oc a i ne , i n vi ol a t i on of 21 U .S .C . § § 9 5 2 , 9 6 0 . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f irm . 

# FI LED NO V 19 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50128 2 C oron el cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y app l yi ng the w rong l egal s t a nda r d w he n e va l ua t i ng w he the rs he w a s e nt i t l e d t o r e l i e f unde rthe s a f

e ty va l ve prov i si on of 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(f) . T he re cord ref l ec t s thatthe di stri ctcourtappl i ed the corre ctl egal st andard i n d enyi ng sa fe ty val ve re l i ef . C oron el al so cont ends thatthe di stri ctcourterre d b y f ai l i ng t o p rovi de an adequat e s t at em entof re as on s f or denyi ng re l i ef

and b ec ause C oron el m ade a good- f a i th e f f or tt o truthf

ul l y pr ovi de a l l i nf

or m a t i on a nd e vi de nc e c onc e rni ng the o ff en se . T h e r ec o rd su p p o rts th e d istrict co u rt’s d eter m in atio n th at C o ro n el’s t es t i m on y w as i ncon si st entand con fl i ct i ng . T he di stri ctcourtdi d n otcl ea rl y e rr w h en i td et erm i n ed th atC o ro n el d i d n o tm eeth er b u rd en o f p ro v i n g b y a p r e p o n d e r a n c e o f

th e e v id e n c e th a t s h e q u a lif ie d f o rs a f e ty v a lv e r e lie f

. See U ni ted State s v . D i az - C ar de nas , 35 1 F . 3d 40 4, 40 9 (9th C i r. 20 03 ). AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jason Grenfell-Gardner, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: August 11, 2014


| |     |                                      
| | --- | -------------------------------------
| | /s/ | Jason Grenfell-Gardner               
| |     | Jason Grenfell-Gardner               
| |     | President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit24.3

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALLMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes andappoints each of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T.Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawfulattorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for himand his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connectionwith the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation oron behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of theCorporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including thispower of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and anyapplicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has signed these presents this 8th day of March,2005.

|  | /s/ DONALD G.DRAPKIN                  DONALD G.DRAPKIN |
|--|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 15

To
the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Allstate Life Insurance Company:

We
have reviewed, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of
Allstate Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2003 and 2002, as indicated in our report dated May 13, 2003; because we did not perform an
audit, we expressed no opinion on such financial statements.

We
are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003, is
incorporated by reference in the following Registration Statements:

Forms S-3 Registration Nos.

Forms N-4 Registration Nos.333-100068

333-102934333-102319

333-72017333-102325

333-31288333-96115


We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago,
Illinois
May 13, 2003

E-1

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06122]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin 
Diseases; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.
    The meeting will be closed to the public as indicated below in 
accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended for the review, discussion, and evaluation of 
individual intramural programs and projects conducted by the National 
Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, including 
consideration of personnel qualifications and performance, and the 
competence of individual investigators, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Board of Scientific Counselors, NIAMS.
    Date: April 15-16, 2015.
    Time: 6:00 p.m. to 3:45 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate personal qualifications and 
performance, and competence of individual investigators.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31, Room 4C32, 31 
Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: John J. O'Shea, MD, Ph.D., Scientific Director, 
National Institute of Arthritis & Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, 
Building 10, Room 9N228, MSC 1820, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 496-
2612, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#cda2bea5a8aca78dacbfafe3a3a4aca0bee3a3a4a5e3aaa2bb"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="325d415a575358725340501c5c5b535f411c5c5b5a1c555d44">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.846, 
Arthritis, Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Research, National 
Institutes of Health, HHS).

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Carolyn Baum,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-06122 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 12.1

<TABLE>

                    CHEVY CHASE PREFERRED CAPITAL CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                    AND PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDEND REQUIREMENTS
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       (in thousands, except ratio data)

                                                                                                                   As of or for the
                                                             As of or for the year ended December 31,                period ended
                                                  ----------------------------------------------------------------   December 31,
                                                          1999                  1998                 1997                1996
                                                  --------------------- --------------------- -------------------- -----------------
<S>                                               <C>                   <C>                   <C>                  <C>
Net income                                                 $20,083            $21,369               $21,628            $ 1,832
Fixed charges                                                 -                  -                     -                  -
                                                  --------------------- --------------------- -------------------- -----------------
Earnings before fixed charges                              $20,083            $21,369               $21,628            $ 1,832
                                                  ===================== ===================== ==================== =================

Fixes charges, as above                                    $  -               $  -                  $  -               $  -
Preferred stock dividend requirements                       15,563             15,563                15,563              1,254
                                                  --------------------- --------------------- -------------------- -----------------
Fixed charges including preferred stock dividends          $15,563            $15,563               $15,563            $ 1,254
                                                  ===================== ===================== ==================== =================


Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and
   Preferred stock dividend requirements                      1.29               1.37                 1.39               1.46
</TABLE>
l. Q. 

A. 

2. Q. 

A. 

REF ID:A2436084 

17 November 1949 

QUiST!CNS AOOU'l' THE BCll {CSP J800A) ;rnrcH 

nm BRITISH !!AT r.sK,. AND ANSt'ERS 11tf.RETO 

Can British take J80)A to F..ngland? 

Atter British have officially accepted t.~e Bel' aa the US-UK highest 

level crypto device. 

Circuit diagram and description of operation to England? 

Same ae answer to IJ.. 

J. Q. How long will it take for combined purposes to replhce CC!.i with Bmn 

A. Until 1 Jan 1952 at the earliest. 

4. Q. How secure ia BCU compared to Ceil? 

s. 

6. 

7. 

8. 

9. 

A.. All possible weaknesses of the CC'H have been overcome in the BCl~ 

including -

Q. 

'· 

Q. 

A. 

~. 

A. 

Q. 

A. 

Q. 

A. 

Lobetera 

liDd rotor orr 

Short cycle lenathe. 

1he aecurity of Bill.! ia regarded aa greatly superior to the CCt. 

U we adopt BCJ.f now, as it atanda, what are the prospects for even 

greater secrurit7 at some future time, on a not too coetl7 basis. 

(a) Changeable tires. 

(b) Add 2 effective rotors to the m.aze. 

Can the TYPEX be adapted to work with thfJ BCil? 

Yes, 7-rotor adaptation, 2 du.."lliliea. Proposed ads.pter r:ill nork 

with 5-rotor W.1, 5-rotcr CCli, or 7-rotor machine. 

lih,y uae dUMm:iea? 'f.hy not make them live :rotore"t 

-ihere is no means a't;. the present time or adapting 11.S. CCi~ machines 

to the 7-rotor deaign, but research is in progress. 

U BCl~ is for highest level, wm.t will be used for mediUM level? 

Use BCV with different rotor•. 

What are the proposed US-UK physical security requirements? 

(1) Register, and account for at least quarterly to a central office 

or record, all component parts, i.e.~ 

Machine 

!Ja.aketa 

Botora 

l'.07 lists 

(2) Stowage. 

(3) Hasardoue Jut7 restrictions. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-20-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 
REF ID:A2436084 

, 17 November 1949 

QUiSTIONS ABOUT ~ BCJC (CSP J800A) ;:ffUCH 

mJi: BRITISH MAY ASX, AND ANSriEl:S '1'HMi:ro 

t'X>irr'D 

10. Q. Would the U.S. authorize the .=anufacture, tor the !lritish,, by the 

U.S. manufacturer, a eU:ficient number of the U.S. type of BCif., 

naaely CSP .)800A, provided the Bri t.iah pq the cost'! 

A. Te• - it le1ally practicable. no objection by Armed ~erv"icee but 

there .tiay be legal obstacles to overcome. 

11. Q. Will U.D .. give British j~s and dies·.~ 

A. llot feasible. 

12. Q. Will U.S. lend Briti8h jigs and dies? 

lot teasibl~. 

1,3. Q. British ::;ould like the 'blueprints to manufacture in 'Kngland. 

A. Jlfo - becau•e of patents involved. N>uld have to have a licenee 

from Tele type. 

11;.. Q. Is the U.S. prepared to compare the merit• o! BCM versus a proposed 

new British .machine? 

A.. Ko. '1'1i.s in a conference about the Bell. 

15. Q. Britiah indicated unofficially that the1 would like to diacues 

low-echelon security equipinent • 

.A. W1.ll be discuesed at conference on Yondq, 21 Novwnber, at 

11:00 a.m. 

a 

L. F. Safford 

Gaptain, USN 

mu-us
I "'! .... 

Categories of RSA Spee1&1.t.tec 

2l. Jan 54 

Capt.8chestopoJ./6o682/Jmr 

l.. A eecotd eaa:f'eftmi.'!e in the proJect, Categories of JS.A Special.1,il!fl,, 

lle.e been scheduled tor .1.6 Feb 54 at 1:30 p .. m.. in the Pld> coo.rei .. nce rtJOm. 

a. 'fhe Pi.&r.PO•e ot these ccmrereneea 1• ult:lm.telJ' to provide 11s1;s at 

J*a\le iu w.rioua categories vho caula. 'be cross-detailed to replace cauualties 

1D. ervent of .. rpDCJ'. 

3. Request JOU Hiid a repreaentat1.ve t-~ JOui: D.i.'Ylsion.. In ad.cl .tion to 

th1a represe:nta.tiTe1 it there is UV"One Jw.l1;'lcular4 vell-f'itted to contribute 

to the vork of'. the conference at large,, we wul.4 apprecSate bi& preseni.:e. 

1- l'Cll Sil: CBIEI',, PERSOBIEI. DIVISION: 

..lt1Etl P. IAUDm m.cOL., us.\ 

Cbie:t,, Plans Branch 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

      In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of DF China Technology,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31, 2004 (the
"Report"), I, Aaron Zho Xiaojun, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certify that to my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m or Section
78o(d)); and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 18, 2004

                                           By:    /s/ Aaron Zhu Xiaojun
                                               -----------------------------
                                           Name:  Aaron Zhu Xiaojun
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014184EN.01000101.xml

| 16.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/1

---

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

2014/C 184/01

Last publication

Last publication

OJ C 175, 10.6.2014

Past publications

Past publications

OJ C 159, 26.5.2014

OJ C 151, 19.5.2014

OJ C 142, 12.5.2014

OJ C 135, 5.5.2014

OJ C 129, 28.4.2014

OJ C 112, 14.4.2014

These texts are available on:

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

142) M-K- (B) -141 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:53 AM Sheet 142 of 325 
P.2 

r~ 

IB ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC. 

II-K-CB)-141 

June 8, 1984 

Mr. Robert Short 

Economic Analysis Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Drop-12 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

7 

Subject: Contract No. 68-02-3564, Work Assignment #1# 

Revised Industrial Coal Price Forecast 

Dear Robert: 

ICF has revised the industrial coal price forecast. Reference 

memorandum from C. Ebert (ICF) to J. Greenwald (EPA), "Revised Industrial Coal Prices for Industrial NSPS Analyses," May 31, 1984. The 

attached tables present revised annualized industrial coal prices. 

Sincerely, 

/ /<••»*_ 

Tim Hogan 

TH/ce 

Enclosure 

cc: Dr. A. Wehe 

Economic s / Engineerin g 
REVISED ANNUALIZED INDUSTRIAL COAL PRICES0 

(1982 $/MMBtu) 

P.3 

lb S02/MMBtu 

Bituminous 

<0.80 

0.80-1.08 

1.08-1.67 

1.67-2.50 

2.50-3.33 

3.3.3-5.00 

>5.00 

Subbituminous 

<0.80 

0.80-1.08 

1.08-1.67 

1.67-2.50 

New 

England 

N.A. 

3.69 

3.64 

3.58 

3.39 

3.10 

3.20 

— 

--

— 

— 

New York/ 

New Jersey 

N.A. 

3.45 

3.38 

3.23 

3.07 

2.76 

2.79 

— 

— 

— 

--

Middle 

Atlantic 

N.A. 

3.08 

2.88 

2.79 

2.70 

2.37 

2.34 

— 

— 

— 

--

South 

Atlantic 

N.A. 

3.13 

2.92 

2.90 

2.82 

2.74 

2.57 

--

— 

— 

--

Midwest 

N.A. 

3.25 

3.12 

3.02 

2.87 

2.62 

2.45 

N.A. 

3.31 

3.27 

3.24 

Ten percent discount rate. Fifteen year period beginning in 1987. 

N.A. = not available. 
REVISED ANNUALIZED INDUSTRIAL COAL PRICES* 

(1982 $/MMBtu) 

P.4 

lb S02/MMBtu 

Bituminous 

<0.80 

0.80-1.08 

1.08-1.67 

1.67-2.50 

2.50-3.33 

3.33-5.00 

>5.00 

Subbituminous 

<0.80 

0.80-1.08 

1.08-1.67 

1.67-2.50 

Southwest 

N.A. 

3.27 

3.15 

3.14 

3.13 

3.03 

2.90 

N.A. 

3.42 

3.32 

3.26 

Central 

N.A. 

3.08 

3.02 

2.98 

2.86 

2.57 

2.42 

N.A. 

2.69 

2.64 

2.67 

North 

Central 

N.A. 

1.95 

1.82 

1.83 

— 

— 

— 

N.A. 

1.37 

1.36 

1.26 

West 

N.A. 

2.74 

2.76 

2.72 

— 

— 

— 

N.A. 

2.78 

2.69 

2.60 

Northwest 

N.A. 

3.12 

2.91 

2.78 

--

— 

— 

N.A. 

2.61 

2.55 

2.05 

aTen percent discount rate. Fifteen year period beginning in 1987. 

N.A. = not available. 
P.5 

<*-

COMPARISON OF ANNUALIZED INDUSTRIAL COAL PRICES3 

(1982 $/MMBtu) 

Midwest North Central 

lb S02/MMBtu New Old New Old 

Bituminous 

<0.80 

0.80-1.08 

1.08-1.67 

1.67-2.50 

2.50-3.33 

3.33-5.00 

>5.00 

Subbituminous 

<0.80 N.A. 2.78 N.A. 1.58 

0.80-1.08 3.31 2.78 1.37 1.45 

1.08-1.67 3.27 — 1.36 0.95 

1.67-2.50 3.24 — 1.26 0.94 

aTen percent discount rate. Fifteen year period beginning in 1987. 

N.A. = not available. 

N.A. 

3.25 

3.12 

3.02 

2.87 

2.62 

2.45 

3.37 

3.21 

3.16 

2.95 

2.88 

2.53 

2.42 

N.A. 

1.95 

1.82 

1.83 

- -

— 

__ 

1.84 

1.64 

1.32 

1.42 

— 

- -

- -
\»£.-)"""" Po.,.--'lr '"'! C. f.3 

Protecting I~~el,ligence Senator McCarthy's renewed assault on the Central 

Intelligence Agency, now that· Congress is in recess, 

again raises the question of protection of vital national 

. secrets. The' Senator obviously is looking for a new 

issue to divert attention from his recent setbacks, and 

the· Administration can no more afford to yield now to 

·his attacks than it could a month ago. Some sort of 

-legislative check on the operations of the Central Intelligence Agency, however, would help both to protect secrets and to prevent futμre fishing expeditions. 

Senator ;Mike Mansfield has introduced a resolution 

:· calling for the establishment of a Joint Committee on 

. · Central IntelUgence to function in a manner similar 

to the Joint Committee on Atomic Energy. 

It is of course preposterous to think that loose se· 

curity precautions are a problem in CIA, as Senator 

McCarthy has insinuated. The real problem is not 

sec:urity but immunity from public scrutiny and criticism under the democratic process. Manifestly it is 

Impossible to expose CIA's operations to public gaze 

'.: without destroying the intelligence system. Indeed, the 

:-.. · .,minently successful British intelligence system is responsible only to "the government," meaning the Prime 

-~ · Minister, and, because of the trust in the civil servants, 

is virtually never mentioned on the floor of Parliament. But CIA's position with respect to Congress has 

never been precisely spelled out. Congress clearly gave 

te the director of Central Intelligence the · responsibility for protecting sources- of information; but it· is 

iinprobable that, if put to a test, the refusal of a CIA 

official of a sTJ.bpena to testify on norisecret information would be upheld. 

In any. event, a Joint Committee on Central Intelligence would focus· the congressional responsibility in 

intelligence matters. A committee of 18 members as 

suggested by Senator Mansfield seems to us unwieldy; 

two members from each party in each house, say, would 

be preferable. Such a committee. would serve to keep 

Congress informed generally of CIA policy and the 

efficiency of operations, and thus would help to keep. 

.. the agency on its toes. BY channP.li7.in .. innnl .. ln~ ft .... ft .... 

latellilenee matters, the committee also would help 

protect se.Curity. In lieu of the ordinary check through 

, puhlidt1 _that is impossible in the case of intelligence, 

,. ~Y chosen watchdog committee could both ~el!!!!Uft t)l:e country and safeguard the agency from invasions by political demagogues. 

REF ID:A39397