alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         127,011
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          16,246
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                17,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  3,188,063
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         988,814
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         1,002,167
<LOANS>                                      5,673,726
<ALLOWANCE>                                     73,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,224,071
<DEPOSITS>                                   6,469,273
<SHORT-TERM>                                   220,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            411,675
<LONG-TERM>                                  2,250,096
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       362,159
<OTHER-SE>                                     510,868
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              10,224,071
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                122,973
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               64,554
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   583
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               188,110
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              47,579
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              81,735
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          106,375
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               3,116
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 42,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 81,026
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      81,026
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,667
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.37
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.46
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,914
<LOANS-PAST>                                     7,209
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 4,298
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                74,393
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   17,980
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,748
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               73,606
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            73,606
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of CPAC, Inc. for the period ending September 30, 1996, and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000351717
<NAME> CPAC, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                      13,231,724
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,179,559
<ALLOWANCES>                                   693,000
<INVENTORY>                                 16,236,562
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            44,894,152
<PP&E>                                      24,169,914
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,756,645
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              65,988,699
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,763,633
<BONDS>                                      7,938,769
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        71,145
<OTHER-SE>                                  45,512,446
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                65,988,699
<SALES>                                     47,414,271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,414,271
<CGS>                                       24,640,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,640,673
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             373,375
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,926,151
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,846,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,080,151
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,080,151
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.55
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.44




                                  Certification
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     with Respect to the North Valley Bancorp Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                      for the Quarter ended March 31, 2003



         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of North Valley Bancorp, a California corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

         1.       The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended March 31, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



Dated:  May 14, 2003                            /s/ MICHAEL J. CUSHMAN
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Michael J. Cushman
                                                President and Chief
                                                Executive Officer
                                                (Principal Executive Officer)



Dated:  May 14, 2003                            /s/ EDWARD J. CZAJKA
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Edward J. Czajka
                                                Executive Vice President
                                                and Chief Financial Officer
                                                (Principal Financial Officer)

                                       25
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-7366
MICHAEL W. SLOAN, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus JANE KIMBRIEL; JAMES M. LESLIE, Defendants - Appellees, and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, i.e., U.S. Attorney's Office; FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-347-3) Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: May 21, 2003 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.2 Michael W. Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael W. Sloan appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his mandamus petition, granting judgment to the Defendants on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sloan v. United States , No. CA-01-347-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2002; July 10, 2002; Aug. 14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-7907

ARTHUR LEE HAIRSTON, SR.,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS, 

Director F.B.O.P.; HARRELL WATTS, National Inmate Appeals; 

C. EICHENLAUB, Regional Director; ERIC WILSON, Warden; 

KATHERINE LAYBOURN, Dr.; PAUL KELLY, Case Manager 

Coordinator; ANGELA TOMLINSON, Camp Unit Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior

District Judge. (1:13-cv-00682-TSE-IDD)

Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: May 22, 2014

Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals from the district 

court’s order dismissing his complaint with prejudice for 

failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (2012). We 

have reviewed the complaint, as well as Hairston’s informal 

brief and the district court record, and we conclude that the 

dismissal was proper. See Hairston v. Holder, No. 

1:13-cv-00682-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 2013). However, we 

modify the district court’s order to show that the dismissal was 

without prejudice to Hairston’s refiling his complaint. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
No. 99-40440 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-40440 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HECTOR MARTINEZ-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-198-1

-------------------- April 14, 2000 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Hector Martinez-Cruz appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute and possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. His sole allegation of error is that the district court erred in denying a motion to suppress statements he made to law-enforcement officers after his apprehension. Martinez-Cruz has not shown that the courtcommitted clear error in accepting the testimony of lawenforcement officials that no one struck him or otherwise coerced him into waiving his rights or making a statement. See UnitedNo. 99-40440 -2- States v. Restrepo , 994 F.2d 173, 183 (5th Cir. 1993). Having reviewed the record, we conclude that Martinez-Cruz has shown no error in the district court’s determination that he voluntarily waived his rights and gave a statement about the offense. See id. at 184. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 10.8

AMENDMENT FIVE

TO PRODUCT PURCHASE AGREEMENT NO. 1585-042103

This Amendment Five to the Product Purchase Agreement No. 1585-042103 (PPA) dated July 30, 2003, (the Amendment Five) dated
April 6, 2009, (the Amendment Five Effective Date) is between Overland Storage Inc. (OVERLAND), a California corporation, with offices at 4820 Overland Avenue, San Diego, California 92123, and Hewlett-Packard Company
(HP), a Delaware corporation, with offices at 3000 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, California 94304. OVERLAND and HP may be referred to individually as a Party and collectively as Parties.

WHEREAS, OVERLAND and HP have entered into the PPA including all exhibits and amendments thereto, (collectively, the Agreement), whereby OVERLAND authorized
HP to distribute and promote certain products and services pursuant to the terms and conditions contained therein;

WHEREAS, OVERLAND and HP each desires
to amend the Agreement;

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties
agree to amend the Agreement as follows:



| | 1. | The Term as set forth in Section 1.3 of the Agreement shall be amended to extend the Term of the Agreement through July 30, 2012 inclusive, and such Term shall
automatically renew for successive one-year periods for three (3) years, unless earlier terminated under the terms of the Agreement.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Except as expressly set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings given thereto in the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment Five to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the dates indicated below.



|                       |  |                          |  |                         |  |        |  |                             
|---------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------
|OVERLAND STORAGE, INC. |  |                          |  | HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY
|                       |  |                          |  |                        
|By:                    |  | /s/    Vernon A. LoForti |  |                         |  | By:    |  | /s/    Richard Gentilini    
|Name:                  |  | Vernon A. LoForti        |  |                         |  | Name:  |  | Richard Gentilini           
|Title:                 |  | President                |  |                         |  | Title: |  | Director, SWD Gl Procurement
|Date:                  |  | April 20, 2009           |  |                         |  | Date:  |  | 5-6-09
,20- 0.9(063 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ANTHONY THOMAS CHERNETSKY, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

CHAPLAIN RICHARD SNYDER, WSCC; 

WARDEN PERRY RUSSELL, WSCC; 

AND A.W. RON SCHRECKENGOST, 

WSCC, 

Respondents. 

No. 84068 

FILED 

MAR 2 9 2022 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERKF SrREME COURT 

BY 

DEPUTYsIL 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This pro se appeal was docketed in this court on January 12, 

2022. On that same day, this court issued a notice directing appellant to 

pay the required filing fee or demonstrate compliance with NRAP 24 within 

fourteen days. On January 21, 2022, appellant filed a motion for leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis. On January 25, this court entered an order 

directing appellant to first seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the 

district court. 

The documents presently before this court, indicate that the 

appellant filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with the district court. 

On March 4, 2022, the district court filed an order regarding appellant's 

motion that noted appellant had not filed an affidavit in support of his 

request to proceed in forma pauperis and directed appellant to file the 

affidavit no later than March 15, 2022. To date, appellant has not paid the 

filing fee or demonstrated compliance with the district court's March 4, 

2022, order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. See NRAP 3(a)(2). 

It is so ORDERED. 

CI.,ERK OF THE SUPREME COURT 

ELIZABETH A. B OWN 

BY: 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

0) 1947 41kEY. 
cc: Hon. Jarnes Todd Russell, District Judge 

Anthony Thomas Chernetsky 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Ron Schreckengost 

Carson City Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

CLERK'S ORDER 

2 

1447 4D.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 11, 2020

No. 04-19-00576-CR

George Oscar PENA,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CR6904

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On February 4, 2020, appellant filed a motion to recalculate the due date for filing 

appellant’s brief, stating the reporter’s record on file in this court was not yet complete. On 

February 19, 2020, the final outstanding volume of the reporter’s record was filed in this court

and notice of the filing was sent to all counsel of record. Accordingly, appellant’s motion is 

DENIED AS MOOT. Appellant’s brief is due thirty (30) days from the date the final volume of 

the reporter’s record was filed—March 20, 2020. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
I· 

i 

I 

!· 

I 

I 

I 

I 

l 

I 

i 

t· 

Div. 

~-:·-------·-·--·- ·---. ----· --···- ---·---------·. 

·;. . 

16. Room 

Addrn• onl11 

n 

\._..) 

5618 

REF ID :A52212;t_ ~ I ·~ ( ) 

'\ , ' .. 9110 

-- ·- -------- ----- -----. --·- ·-1 

-. -..,.... 

Paper No. 2 

''The Comml•loner of Pa&en& .. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

All commanlcatloM rdpl'rlln1 &hll 

appllca&lon 1hould 11.a \he 11erial number, 

date or t1lln1. and 1111BG of 

W•injl&on, D. C.," &lie .ppllcan& 

anti not 1111 omcl&I br - ows/ 6' a WASHINGTON 

Please find below a communication from the EXAMINER in /April 9

1 

1932 

charge of thi1 application.~ E ~ i 

••• 11~1 Com'mi111ioner of Patent.. App 1 i o ant : ,1S. ll1am l. Frie dman. ~. 

et al 

P. Et. Vani.Gmerke 6 

C. A. Roga, 

o/o ChiGf ot the Air 

FlU.D1 tl one :Jl di!. 

\7aahingtm, D. 0. 

Corps., 

!l?his oaea bas been exam1n811. 

aetterenaas nade ot reoard: 

Ser. No. 

Filed 

For 

588344 . JaDWl ey 23, 19 2B : Crnto~raphlo S7otam: 

.... ~·· .. ~-. 

Hovland 11 111,695 Sep~ember 2.2, 1914 

wheeler 11 0761 167 ~ch 91 1926 

l'IS-28 

176·17.5 

KOl'D 1 l'IB-22 .I 1 9311 886 Oo°tobR 29, 1929 

lumboal 1 is aot to Wit o• th e dNwi DB. 

Claim 1 io 3 l;qolualve and _as are reJeotel as tull.J 

met b7 Borland, otte&, 1n mtoil m.vboar4 inn•1tter 10, oaautator 1 and code tl'8D811lit te~ JC are seriq 001111eoted. 

Claim 18 11 reJeoted as ob Ti oualy tall7 st b7 the 

atoralae bum ot ·,Jheeler et al, oited. 

Claim 24 ta zie~ote4 ae full.r met b7 Ve1."DB111t aotnowledaed 

la appllaant's 11eo1fioat1 on. J?b.11 ola 1m is also re~eoted am 

being an agpesatloD ot elaaellt •• b etrg a list ot 'tbree elemnta 

w1 tbout B».J nol t8' 1 on of their ooopen tlon or &tl'U.OtUl'& l 

1'elat 1ouhlp. 

0 lalms 40 to SO 1aolua1v • are r e3 eote4 a a be 1nB impro1er 

•tho4 ola 1me, being the aormal opeziation ot the appara'lnla anl 

aa not patentabl• over the allowed apparatUR ala 1.Ds. 

I 

I 

Ola1ma 4 to lf lnolua1ve. 19 to 23 int"lua1ve, 25 to 32 

______ . in19!u!Y~. _8Jld.M. 'to 39 1nolu.o!ve .appau_a~ pNsen.t to bs -----i 

i 

aUov.eblo. 

pproved for Release by NSA on 11-20-2013 pursuant to E.O. 

13526 

! 

I 

\ 

,, 

I 

I 

.)
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2204 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify the mailing 

requirement relating to social security account statements. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. CASSIDY, Ms. SINEMA, Mrs. MURRAY, Mr. 

CASEY, and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; which was read 

twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

the mailing requirement relating to social security account statements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know Your Social Se5 curity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF REQUIREMENT TO MAIL SOCIAL 

7 SECURITY ACCOUNT STATEMENTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1143 of the Social Secu9 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b–13) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2204 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a)(1), by adding at the end 

2 the following: ‘‘Such statement shall be provided by 

3 mail unless the requesting individual chooses elec4 tronic delivery for that request.’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (c)(2)— 

6 (A) by striking ‘‘Beginning not later than’’ 

7 and inserting ‘‘(A) Beginning not later than’’; 

8 (B) by inserting ‘‘by mail’’ after ‘‘provide’’; 

9 and 

10 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(B) In any case in which an eligible individual de12 scribed in subparagraph (A) responds to an annual inquiry 

13 by the Commissioner relating to the mailing of the individ14 ual’s statement by making an election that such statement 

15 for such year be provided in electronic form only, the re16 quirements of this paragraph shall be deemed to be satis17 fied for such year with respect to the individual.’’. 

18 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to social security 

20 account statements required to be provided after the date 

21 of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS