alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2015 

To amend the FAST Act to require an update to the national travel and 

tourism infrastructure strategic plan, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2021 

Ms. ROSEN (for herself, Mr. WICKER, Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. SCOTT of Florida, Ms. CORTEZ MASTO, and Mr. BLUNT) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend the FAST Act to require an update to the national 

travel and tourism infrastructure strategic plan, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Travel Optimization 

5 by Updating and Revitalizing Infrastructure to Support 

6 Mobilization Act’’ or the ‘‘TOURISM Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2015 IS

1 SEC. 2. NATIONAL TRAVEL AND TOURISM INFRASTRUC2 TURE STRATEGIC PLAN. 

3 Section 1431(e) of the FAST Act (49 U.S.C. 301 

4 note; Public Law 114–94) is amended— 

5 (1) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through 

6 (7) as subparagraphs (A) though (G), respectively, 

7 and indenting appropriately; 

8 (2) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A) 

9 (as so redesignated)— 

10 (A) by striking ‘‘Not later than 3 years 

11 after the date of enactment of this Act’’ and in12 serting ‘‘Not later than 180 days after the date 

13 of enactment of the TOURISM Act’’; and 

14 (B) by striking ‘‘plan that includes’’ and 

15 inserting the following: ‘‘plan— 

16 ‘‘(1) to develop an immediate-term and long17 term strategy, including policy recommendations 

18 across all modes of transportation, for the Depart19 ment and other agencies to use infrastructure invest20 ments to revive the travel and tourism industry and 

21 the overall travel and tourism economy in the wake 

22 of the COVID–19 pandemic; and 

23 ‘‘(2) that includes’’; and 

24 (3) in paragraph (2) (as so redesignated)— 

25 (A) in subparagraph (A) (as so redesig26 nated), by inserting ‘‘, including consideration 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2015 IS

1 of the impacts of the COVID–19 pandemic’’ 

2 after ‘‘network’’; 

3 (B) in subparagraph (D) (as so redesig4 nated), by inserting ‘‘of regional significance’’ 

5 after ‘‘corridors’’; 

6 (C) in subparagraph (F) (as so redesig7 nated), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

8 (D) in subparagraph (G) (as so redesig9 nated), by striking the period at the end and in10 serting ‘‘; and’’; and 

11 (E) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(H) an identification of possible infra13 structure investments that create recovery op14 portunities for small, underserved, minority, 

15 and rural businesses in the travel and tourism 

16 industry, including efforts to preserve and pro17 tect the scenic but often less-traveled roads that 

18 promote tourism and economic development 

19 throughout the country.’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
~~ita63214 .. WAR DEPARTMENT ... . ~- TRAN~ /HTTAL SHEET 

ARMY SERVICE FORCES 

TO 4D 333 1 The Pentagon (Location) 

Lt. Col. D. K. Lippincott 

(Branch or unit) (A tten tlon) 

Subject: "Electrical System" - Inventor: William F. Friedman 

File No. 

Corcora.n . 1 A~ 1944 

FROM 

(Service, division~ or organization) (Location) (Telephone extension) 

1. On February 17 1 1944, an application tor pa.tent directed to the subject 

invention was forwarded by your office to the inventor. 

2. After eonf'erences with Mr. Friedman and with Mr. Farnam, ot the Legal 

Divi8ion1 the entire case has been rewritten and two new sheets of drawings pre• 

pared. 

3. The red.ratted application, license and assignment forms have been executed 

and are herewith inclosed. Also inclosed are a. carbon cop;r ot tha new specitica• 

tion and claims, the two new sheets of Pa.tent Of'tice drawings and a photostatic 

print of ea.ch of the four sheets ot drawings now in the case. Certain minor additions and corrections are iJJdicated in red ink on the prints ot sheets 1 and 2 of 

the drawings. 

4. It is requested that the application be tiled it the papers are found to 

be in proper form; otherwise, that necessary clumges be made and the applios.tion 

returned £or re-execution. 

S. The case is current~ classified "Opnfidential"• 

For the Chief', Army Communications Service: 

3 Inels. 

Incl le Spee & Olaima 

Incl 2. License & Assgmt; 

Incl 3. Drawings 

W. D., A. G. O. Form No. 0105 

March 27, 1913 

z'l-20 956. eclassified and a 

%&~c;4?~ 

~/ ~;'- VJL/.?':il.'o~YJ£-, 

w. Preston rman 

Colonel, Signal Corps 

Chief', Signal Security Branch 

SPSIS·ljl Code 8129, Ext. 2ll 

ursuantto E .0. 1352
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 1998, THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEET AS OF JUNE 30, 1998
AND THE CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE TWELVE MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,550
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,683
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     16,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,741
<PP&E>                                           4,207
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,996
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,243
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,496
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,872
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,996
<SALES>                                         75,164
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                75,164
<CGS>                                           51,965
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                19,559
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (940)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,543
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,751
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,792
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,792
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.27
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 09-cv-02990-WYD-MEH WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, Plaintiff,
v. KEN SALAZAR, in his official capacity as S ecretary, U.S. Department of the Interior, Defendant.
MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on March 18, 2010. Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Appear by Telephone [filed March 16, 2010; docket #22 ] and Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Leave to Appear by Telephone [filed March 16, 2010; docket #24 ] are granted . Counsel for the parties shall first conference together, then call my Chambers at (303) 844-4507 at the appointed time for the scheduling conference.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2047 

To ban the use of intentionally added perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl 

substances in cosmetics. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2021 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Ms. HASSAN, 

Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, and Mr. KING) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To ban the use of intentionally added perfluoroalkyl or 

polyfluoroalkyl substances in cosmetics. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No PFAS in Cosmetics 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. BAN ON PERFLUOROALKYL OR POLYFLUOROALKYL 

7 SUBSTANCES. 

8 (a) DIRECTED RULEMAKING.—Not later than 270 

9 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2047 IS

1 of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section 

2 as the ‘‘Secretary’’) shall issue a proposed rule to ban the 

3 use of intentionally added perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl 

4 substances in cosmetics. Not later than 90 days after 

5 issuing the proposed rule, the Secretary shall finalize such 

6 rule. 

7 (b) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘perfluo8 roalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance’’ means a perfluoroal9 kyl or polyfluoroalkyl substance that is man-made and has 

10 at least 1 fully fluorinated carbon atom. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

892 

KA 14-01830 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRIAN L. SMITH, ALSO KNOWN AS BRIAN LEE SMITH,

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 1.)

 

MICHAEL STEINBERG, ROCHESTER, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (WILLIAM G. ZICKL OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Genesee County (Eric

R. Adams, A.J.), rendered June 25, 2014. The judgment convicted

defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal contempt in the first

degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: In appeal No. 1, defendant appeals from a judgment

convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal contempt in the

first degree (Penal Law § 215.51 [c]) and, in appeal No. 2, he appeals

from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of aggravated

family offense (§ 240.75 [1]). The two matters were covered by a

single plea colloquy. Defendant contends in each appeal that Supreme

Court erred in enhancing his sentence without an adequate factual

basis (see generally People v Outley, 80 NY2d 702, 712-713). 

Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review inasmuch

as “he failed to object to the alleged enhanced sentence[s] and did

not move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment[s] of

conviction on that ground” (People v Laurendi, 126 AD3d 1401, 1402, lv

denied 26 NY3d 1009 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see People v

Epps, 109 AD3d 1104, 1105). We decline to exercise our power to

review defendant’s contention as a matter of discretion in the

interest of justice (see CPL 470.15 [3] [c]).

Defendant further contends in each appeal that he was denied

effective assistance of counsel at sentencing. To the extent that

such contention survives his guilty plea, we conclude that it lacks

merit (see People v LaCroce, 83 AD3d 1388, 1388, lv denied 17 NY3d

807). Defendant “receive[d] an advantageous plea and nothing in the

record casts doubt on the apparent effectiveness of counsel” (People v 
-2- 892 

KA 14-01830 

Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Court of Appeals

THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12547, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711-2547

November 19, 2016

Dear Clerk of the Third Court,

Ranna and Co., LLC, versus Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

I am writing to request an extension for the filing of the record for Trial Cause Number 

D-1-GN-001322. The hearing was held on 8/31/16. I have not had contact from the 

attorneys for payment of the record. I still am needing to request an exhibit. Please let me know if 

I need to do anything further to complete request. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

Carissa Crocker, CSR 

1
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 54 (Friday, March 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14940-14941]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06470]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[Order No. 1965]


Reorganization of Foreign-Trade Zone 104 (Expansion of Service 
Area) Under Alternative Site Framework; Savannah, Georgia

    Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of 
June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade 
Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:


[[Page 14941]]


    Whereas, the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 
CFR Sec. 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization 
of zones;
    Whereas, the World Trade Center Savannah, LLC, grantee of FTZ 104, 
submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-9-2014, docketed 
02-04-2014) for authority to expand the service area of the zone to 
include the Counties of Burke, Candler, Emanuel, Jefferson, Jenkins, 
Johnson, Laurens, Montgomery, Tattnall, Telfair, Toombs, Treutlen, 
Washington and Wheeler, as described in the application, adjacent to 
the Savannah Customs and Border Protection port of entry;
    Whereas, notice inviting public comment was given in the Federal 
Register (79 FR 7642-7643, 02-10-2014) and the application has been 
processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and,
    Whereas, the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the 
examiner's report (including addendum), and finds that the requirements 
of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied with regard to 
expanding the service area of FTZ 104 to include Candler, Emanuel, 
Jenkins, Tattnall, Toombs, and Treutlen Counties, Georgia.
    Now, therefore, the Board hereby orders:
    The application to reorganize FTZ 104 to expand the service area 
under the ASF is approved with regard to the inclusion of Candler, 
Emanuel, Jenkins, Tattnall, Toombs, and Treutlen Counties, Georgia, 
subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 
400.13, and to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the 
zone.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this day of March 12, 2015.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, 
Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06470 Filed 3-19-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Bradley, Respondent, vs. Cramer and others, Appellants.

*November 23*

*December 14, 1886.*

*Appealable order: Refusal to strike cause from calendar: Notice of filing*remittitur.

A motion to have a cause stricken from the calendar of the trial court because the moving party had not had notice of the filing of the. *remittitur*after an appeal and reversal of the judgment, is *held*equivalent to an application for a continuance, and the order thereon not appealable.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Boole*County.

The facts are stated in the opinion.

*T. B.*Chynoweth, for the motion.

*B. K.*Miller, Jr., *contra.*

By the Couet.

This is a motion by the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal herein. The cause was here at the last *416term on an appeal from-a judgment for the plaintiff. The judgment was reversed May 15, 1886, and the cause remanded for a new trial. See 66 Wis. 297. The *remittitur*was filed in the circuit court July 20th,andón October 19th last the plaintiff served notice of trial for the next term, to commence LTovember 3d. On the first day of the term defendants moved to strike the cause from the calendar for the reasons that no notice had been given them of the filing of the *remittitur,*and they were ignorant that it had been filed in the circuit court. The court denied the motion, and this appeal is from the order denying the same. The motion was equivalent to an application for a continuance of the cause over the term for the alleged reason that the necessary steps had not been taken to entitle the plaintiff *to*a trial thereof at that term. It is of the same nature, and governed by the same rules, as a motion to continue a cause to the next term because of the absence of a witness or for any other cause not going to the existence of the action. Such motions do not go to the merits of the action, but are mere matters of practice or procedure, and the orders thereon are not appealable. *McLeod v. Bertschy,*30 Wis. 324.

The motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.
. - -

' 5,f!C~E:i 

f"~v1 ! 

TO; 

INFO~ 

MSG NR: 

DTG~ 

• 

(SUSLO LONDON 

NSA EUROPE 

ASAE 

DIRNSA 

LW 282 

281751z APRIL 54 

-

11 9 

PRIORITY AGI# ¢5671 

I Nf"O: 1~ 

~621 

V/DIR 

C/S 

AG 

¢62 ~L,,,>86-36/50 USC 3605 DPC/SP 

EO 3.3 (h) (2) 

n5 

92 

5/ASST 

1 

2 

~ ~ 15-17 

7-8 18-19 

9 

~ ?lJ 

11-14 

2¢ 

REUR f"W 6<~9, rw 587 PIO MY\2¢14H6Z MARCH~ . AS STATED MY LW 2¢8 

( 2) 1122Z j MARCH ANO '1¢141 ¢Z \MARCH MSGS 11 PRELlMlNARY INTERROGATION 

RE:PORTI f:N GRIGORIEV WAS SENT TO USAREURAND DEPT OF 

ARMY W1~~iHINGTON. AL~Fl SENT USAREUR AND ARMY (LATTERVIA$ALO) 

WERE 3 SUBSfQUENT INl:RROGATION REPORTS: 

\' : L....-----...,....------"'!"'"' ___ f1NTERROGATION Of SOVIET DEFEC."rQR 

GR!GORIEV, 1 DATED lj APRILJ .... ______ __. (D) "SOVIET UNIFORMS 

DATE RECD: 282Hi'Z APRI l '{b BL/ARJ COPY WOF ;,:~?~ PAGE 1 OF' 2 

COPIES 

_PAGES 

NO UNCLASSlf"tE•J REPLY OR ft'.FERENC.E IF' THE DATE TIME GROUP IS QUOTED 

PARAPHRASE No·1 REQUIRED !ONSULT C.RYPTOCENTER BEF"ORE DECLASSIFYING 

FORM 781-C10C 

6 JUL 51 SECRET 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-14-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 
.. - • • 

3ECRET PRIORITY AGI# ¢5671 

DTG~ 281751z APRIL 54 PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO. 3 •. 3 (h) (2) MSG NR: LW 282 

2. IN VIEW GENEROUS OISTRIBUTIONALREADY GIVEN US, DO NOT DESIRE 

REQUEST ADDITIONAL COPIES UNLESS NECESSARY 

3. GRIGORIEV IS IN HANDS OF WAR OFFICE BUT UNDER CONTROL OF 

CABINET LEVEL SUB COMMITTEE WHICH\HAS JURISDICTl.()N OVER ALL DEFE(~Ton 

INTERROGATIONS. COMMITTEE TAKING AC.TIVE INTEREST INGRIGORIEV CASE" 

ON EITHER WAR OFF ICE OR 

C.OMM!TTEf.. BELIEVE BEST COURSE" IS TO CONTINUE WORKING THROUGH 

USAREUR. 

BE STUDIED CAREFULLY AT ASAE AND NSA '--~~~~~~~~~~~~-

BEFORE WE PRESS FOR RE INTERROGATION BY ASAE PERSONNEL. 37/6 

IMPRESSES ME AS BEING PRETTY THOROUGH JOB. HAVE CONFIRMED THAT 

GRIGORIEV REALLY IS lN POOR PHYS'CAL CONDITION AND UNCOOPERATIVE JUST 

NCM 

NSA 115 NOTE: rw 699 NO REtORD 

FW 587 IS AGI# ¢3871 LW 2¢8 IS AGI# ¢38 1 

DTG: 2¢141¢Z IS AGI':// ¢3729 

ADDITIONAL INFO C~TAINED IN AGI# ¢5672 

COPY~@_:_~_COPIES PAGE_~~Of~ 2 PAGES 

'JO WNCLASSIFIED REPLY OR REFERENCE IF THE DATE TIME GROUP IS QUOTED 

0 ARAPHRASf NOT REQUIRED CONSULT CRYPTOCENTER BEFORE DECLASSIFYING 

FORM 781-C10C 

6 JUL 51 SEeRET
TO Mr. Fried.man, AFSA OOT DATE 2 July 1952 

FROM A. W. Foley, AFSA 202L 

SUBJECT KJ-JS09h, ....__~~~~~~~~~~~~---' 

Forwarded herewith for your infoimation and retentio 

is a c~py/of the above KJ letter. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

- J:[ :a. .i... ;.,.. -- .. _ •• • • - --- ___, 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-13-2014 

ursuantto E.O. 13526 
-----------------------------

..... 

/ -- ..,,_ 

REF ID : AS9.lrl 4- --

... TOP SECRET CONTROL 

U. S. DFfl61ALS ONLY 

EO 3.3(h)(2) rt'•• 1952 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

'°' lap\. l. a. llarper, V• ,,... ... '· w. r.i.,, AJ'S&-20& 

,,. 

). 'DI• lonpiD& l• 1111Ddtted. I• 70'V llltoru\ion, Uld. 

J'01& 1dlJ. lie k1Pt. lntol'Md at 8ftJ' turt.ber deftlopaent,a 1n \h•H 

nept.1a\lon1 u tihq oceur. 

U·3809b - . ..... D 

l 

7 

J 

OGA 

. . .. .. . / 

I 

. 

. ' . 

... , .... , __ 

--. . . -

·TIP SEOIET euiTROl -. ·~. - - . ~-,.-U •. S.:ems1ALSJ~LY.~~: .. ~., , .. ' ,, ... ..... .. " .. .... ~. ' .. .. .. ~ '(:"-. 

-- .... ----.r--'" !_._- •- I __ .... ,.,.-~·i "" \ .t" .... ....... ri__:_~ . I .... I' !
REF ID:A521541 

IN 'IDE UNITED STA'mS PATE!rI' OFFICE 

REI Applloation tor Patent or * WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN 

* Serial Number COPY 

l!Yl,244 * Division 2' 

Filed * 23 October 1936 

LETTD lQ B @lR PWTSMAB 

* For. 

CRYPTOORAFHS * 

• * * * * * * * * * 

The Honorable Commissioner ot Patents 

Wuh!.Dgton 25, D. C. 

In the above•identU'ied applioation .tor patent, please direct the Chief 

Draftsman to ohal1ge in ·Figure 2 ot thfJ drawings the re.fe1'8noe 1'187•, as 

it applies to a fixed contact, to read .. 18711 ... The change la 1ndloate4 

in red. on the attaohed print. 

Respeottul~, 

WILLIA.M J!. FRIEDMAN, A.ppliea.nt 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-21-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 

copy
# EXHIBIT 99.3

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Barry Zwarenstein, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Barry Zwarenstein

Barry Zwarenstein
Chief Financial Officer
May 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Iomega Corporation and will be retained by
Iomega Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
### Carol Nielsen - 2006 Kennecott smeltersulfurinput From: To: Date: Subject: Hi Carol, 

### "Kaiser, Chris (KUCC)" "Carol Nielsen" 10/312007 11: 11 AM 2006 Kennecott smelter sulfurinput

In response to your question regarding 2006 smeltersulfur input forthe WRAP inventory, here is ouractual sulfur input: Concentrate fed to flash smelting furnace: 1,012,056tons Average sulfur content (-7,700 conc. samples submitted for XRF analysis): Total sulfur processed: 280,340 tons (sulfur basis) 560,679 (sulfur dioxide basis) Let me know if you need anything further. Regards, Chris Kaiser 569-7427 27.7%



### file://C:\Documents and Settings\cnielsen\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\470378E2EQDOMAINEQAIR... 10/10/2007
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jeffrey P. Fritz, Jr., certify that:







| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of Consumer Portfolio Services, Inc.;
                                                           and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: April 29, 2020

|
|
|
|
|
|