Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 50 / Monday, March 16, 2015 / Notices 13629 

Capital and startup costs include, 

among other items, computers and 

software that you purchase to prepare 

for collecting information and 

monitoring, sampling, and testing 

equipment, and record-storage facilities. 

Generally, your estimates should not 

include equipment or services 

purchased (i) before October 1, 1995; (ii) 

to comply with requirements not 

associated with the information 

collection; (iii) for reasons other than to 

provide information or keep records for 

the Federal Government; or (iv) as part 

of customary and usual business or 

private practices. 

We will summarize written responses 

to this notice and address them in our 

ICR submission for OMB approval, 

including appropriate adjustments to 

the estimated burden. We will provide 

a copy of the ICR to you, free of charge, 

upon request. We also will post the ICR 

at http://www.onrr.gov/Laws_R_D/

FRNotices/ICR0103.htm. 

Public Comment Policy: ONRR will 

post all comments, including names and 

addresses of respondents at http://

www.regulations.gov. Before including 

Personally Identifiable Information (PII), 

such as your address, phone number, 

email address, or other personal 

information in your comment(s), you 

should be aware that your entire 

comment (including PII) may be made 

available to the public at any time. 

While you may ask us, in your 

comment, to withhold PII from public 

view, we cannot guarantee that we will 

be able to do so. 

Dated: March 3, 2015. 

Gregory J. Gould, 

Director, Office of Natural Resources 

Revenue. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05854 Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4335–30–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–893] 

Certain Flash Memory Chips and 

Products Containing the Same 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review an Initial Determination 

Granting a Joint Motion To Terminate 

the Investigation in Its Entirety Based 

Upon Settlement; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 78) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting a joint motion by complainant 

and respondents to terminate the 

investigation in its entirety based upon 

settlement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General 

Counsel, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3042. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on September 9, 2013, based on a 

complaint filed by Spansion, LLC of 

Sunnyvale, California (‘‘Spansion’’). The 

complaint alleged violations of section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, and the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain flash memory chips and 

products containing the same by reason 

of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 6,900,124; 7,018,922; 

6,369,416; 7,151,027; 6,459,625; and 

6,731,536. See 78 Fed. Reg. 55095 (Sept. 

9, 2013). The notice of investigation 

named the following respondents: 

Macronix International Co, Ltd., of 

Hsin-chu, Taiwan; Macronix America, 

Inc., of Milpitas, California; Macronix 

Asia Limited of Kanagawa Pref., Japan; 

Macronix (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., of Sha 

Tin, N.T., Hong Kong; Acer Inc. of New 

Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America 

Corporation of San Jose, California; 

ASUSTek Computer Inc. of Taipei, 

Taiwan; Asus Computer International of 

Fremont, California; Belkin 

International, Inc., of Playa Vista, 

California; D-Link Corporation of Taipei 

City, Taiwan; D-Link System, Inc., of 

Fountain Valley, California; Netgear 

Inc., San Jose, California; Nintendo Co., 

Ltd., of Kyoto, Japan; and Nintendo of 

America, Inc., of Redmond, Washington 

(collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). 

On January 29, 2015, Spansion and 

Respondents filed a joint motion to 

terminate the investigation in its 

entirety based upon the execution of a 

settlement agreement. On February 9, 

2015, the Commission investigative 

attorney filed a response in support of 

termination. No other responses to the 

motion were filed. 

On February 11, 2015, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID, granting the joint motion 

to terminate the investigation in its 

entirety. The ALJ found that the 

settlement agreement complies with the 

requirements of Commission Rule 

210.21(b) (19 CFR 210.21(b)) and that 

terminating Respondents from the 

investigation would not be contrary to 

the public interest. None of the parties 

petitioned for review of the ID. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42 of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 10, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05812 Filed 3–13–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–948] 

Certain Toy Figurines and Toy Sets 

Containing the Same 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

February 6, 2015, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of LEGO A/S of 

Denmark; LEGO System A/S of 

Denmark; and LEGO Systems, Inc. of 

Enfield, Connecticut. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Letters 

supplementing the complaint were filed 

on February 18, 2015 and March 10, 

2015. The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleges violations of section 337 based 

upon the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain toy figurines and 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES