alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
TECHNICAL PAPERS 

Analysis of Mechanico-~lectrical Cryptograph, Part I 

Analysis of Mechanico-Electrical Cryptograph, Part II 

Field Codes Used by German Army During World War 

""' Further Applications of the Principles of Indirect Symmetry 

of Position of Secondary Alphabet - General Solution of ADFGVX Cipher System 

General Solution of Double Transposition Cipher 

German Diplomatic Code 7500, An Encipherment of 

German Military Ciphers from February-November, 1918 ~/Hagelin Cryptograph B 211, Analysis of v Index of Coincidence and its Applications in Cryptanalysis 

Notes on Liaison Service of German Army in World Jlar 

vPerrnutation Tables Involving a F'eature of Non-Transposability 

,......Principles of Indirect Symmetry 

,......Principles of Solution of I.T. & T. Cipher Machine 

Principles of Solution of ~ilitary Field Codes used by 

Germ.an Army, 1917 

Report of Code Compilation Section, GHQ 

Report of Radio Intelligence Section, GHQ, AEF 

Statistical Methods in Cryptanalysis 

V:Statistical Methods in Cryptanalysis (Revised) 

Studies in German Diplomatic Codes Employed During World War 

Zimmerman Telegram of January 16, 1917 

Unclassified Technical Papers 

SIGTIT 

SIGSIX 

SIG PEG 

SI GT ID 

SIGT.AM 

SIG YIP 

SIG POT 

SIGVffi:B 

SIGOWE 

SIGVEX 

SIGSAY 

SIGMOB 

SIGR.AG 

SI GRUN 

SIG WIX 

SIGQUE 

SIGSEE 

SIGROE 

SIGVAN 

SI GS IP 

SIG YEN 

..........-Contributions of the Cryptographic Bureaus in the World War None 

V"Course in Cryptography None 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 12-19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

SECRET
# Q

U.S

. Departmen t GENERA L COUNSE L 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E O f Transportatio n ^ ^ ,«-«-. « Washington , D C 2059 0 Septembe r

30,201 0 Offic e o f th e Secretar y o f Transportatio n

' t 3 O MEMORANDU M FO RDOCKE T NUMBE RDOT.OST-2010-014 0 >

^^__

_Q From:,,^-

- Samue l Podberesk y ,^^ZZZ^^=-^ ' iv j c 5 Assistant-OeHera l Counselo r Aviatio n Enforcemen t

& Proceeding s Re : Meetin g ^rithrepresentative s o f consume r

an dtrave l group s
O n Septembe r

20 , 2010 , DO T officials , includin g Secretar y Ra y LaHood , me t with representative s of

consume r

an dtrave l group s at

2 p mat th e Department' s Washington , D.C

. headquarters

. Durin g thi s meeting , th e group s congratulate dSecretary LaHoodan d th e Departmen t

o n th e pendin g notic e of propose drulemakin g (NPRM ) whic hwoul d strengthe n th e right s o f

ai r traveler s i n th e even t

o f oversales , fligh t

cancellation s an dlon g delays , an densur e that

passenger s hav e accurat e an dadequat e informatio n t o mak e informe ddecision s whe n selectin g flights

. Th e followin g peopl e attende dth e meeting : Sall y Greenberg , Director , Nationa l Consume r Leagu e Ray LaHood, Secretary , DO T Charle s Leocha , Director , Consume r Trave l Allianc e Anju mMalik , Consume r (Managin g Director , Alhambr aChambe r o f Commerce ) Karolin e Mayr , Director , Globa l Trave l Procurement , Deltek , Inc

. Kevi n Mitchell , Chairman , Busines s Trave l Coalitio n Samuel Podberesky , Ass' t Gen

. Counse l for

Aviatio n Enforcemen t

& Proceedings , DO T Jil l Zuckman , Directo r

o f Publi c Affairs , DO T In additio n t o congratulatin g th e Department , th e consume r an dtrave l group s urge dth e Departmen t

t o tak e actio n t o requir e airline s t o disclos e al l ancillar y fee s throug hevery ticketin g channe l i n whic hairline s sel l thei r seats
. Th e group s stresse dth e importanc e o f consumer s havin g promp t an dfull acces s t o ancillar y fee s thereb y ensurin g that th e tota l cos t o f ai r trave l i s fiilly disclosed

. Th e trave l an dconsume r

group s indicate dthei r

plan s t o fil e formal comment s withth e DO T expressin g thei r

view s before th e clos e o f th e commen t

period

. Th e Secretary an d othe r DO T representative s encourage dthe mt o d o so .
m- - -_ C I T Y O ¥^ ^ 

KlRKSVJLLE 

Administration 660.627.1225 • Human Resources 660.627.1458 

Economic & Community Development 660.627.1224 

May 17, 2010 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, Chief j 

Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Ej 

Department of Transportation, Room 6401 § 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

RE: Option to remove 15-Seat Passenger Requirement 

The Kirksville City Council, at their regular meeting of May 17, 2010, voted to opt out of 

the 15-seat requirement that is currently under the essential air service guidelines. In 

addition, the City of Kirksville has spent time reviewing and evaluating proposals 

submitted by the various air carriers. Under a separate cover, we will share our 

recommendations to the United States Department of Transportation. 

We greatly appreciate your support and assistance. 

Sincerely, 

Todd Kuhns 

Mayor 

dah 

PC: Airport and Transportation Commission 

David Hall, Kirksville Regional Airport 

201 S. Franklin • Kirksville, Missouri 63501 

Toll Free: 888.299.1223 • Fax: 660.665.0940 • www.kirksvillecity.com
Colone.1 Dl!l.1e M. KinB 

Chief', NSA i'e..r Ea.st 

APO 500 

&tn Fre.ncisco, Calitorni• 

Dee.i- Colonel Kingt 

lO lovelllber 1954 

A Japanese translation o~ A~:tra.1. Theobald.ta book "The 

final 1ec:ret ot Pearl Barbox-" has :.recently been publ11hed* 

and. I vould b<! moet ap~c1at1ve 11' ;you WQuld purche.ae a 

cow tor me. ( 50Y l'. bollne i.e tM coat per copy and I 

aba.ll ~emit $1.00 or othel"Viae repay you, ~u&t as you say.) 

Aey other reeQnt Japanese book.r;. th&t might ha.ve a bearing on the 

Pearl B'.arbor Atta.ck wouJ.d be or intttr1tst to me and I'd l.iko to know 

their titles and coat. 1.I'hete are tor my per•onal collection. 

Thank.e "lfeey much for ;rour cooprtration, and with cordial 

greet!nsa, I u, 

*The Japaness titlea 

Sl!INJU WAlf IO SBIMPA?f 

("The 3udgment of Pearl. Barbor") 

Translated by Go.ro Be.ke.no 

Publlahed by nu NlP.P01f 

YtJBEftKAI lCODAXSKA 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSBSB for the quarter ended Dec 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2007

/s/Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       ---------------

                                                       Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

**CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSBSB for the quarter ended Dec 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 12, 2007

/s/ Robert E. Wolfe

                                                          --------------

                                                         Robert E. Wolfe

                                                         Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-15-009]

# Agency Holding the Meeting:

United States International Trade Commission.

# Time and Date:

March 23, 2015 at 11:00 a.m.

# Place:

Room 101, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# Status:

Open to the public.

# Matters to be Considered:

1. Agendas for future meetings: None.

2. Minutes.

3. Ratification List.

4. Vote in Inv. Nos. 701-TA-459 and 731-TA-1155 (Review) (Commodity Matchbooks from India). The Commission is currently scheduled to complete and file its determinations and views of the Commission on April 2, 2015.

5. Outstanding action jackets: None.

In accordance with Commission policy, subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting. Earlier announcement of this meeting was not possible.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: March 17, 2015.

William R. Bishop,

Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.

[FR Doc. 2015-06430 Filed 3-17-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2014

- NM

- 162

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14241 and #14242]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a Notice of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Hawaii (FEMA-4201-DR), dated 03/04/2015. *Incident:*
                         Pu u O o Volcanic Eruption and Lava Flow. *Incident Period:*
                         09/04/2014 and continuing. *Effective Date:*
                         03/04/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/04/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/04/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the President's major disaster declaration on 03/04/2015, Private Non-Profit organizations that provide essential services of governmental nature may file disaster loan applications at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:* Hawaii. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14241D and for economic injury is 14242D.
 
 
 (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) James E. Rivera, Associate Administrator for Disaster Assistance.


[FR Doc. 2015-06331 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40991

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

versus

FRANCISCO ALVARO-VELASCO,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:15-CR-144-1

Before JOLLY, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Following his guilty-plea conviction of illegal reentry, Francisco Alvaro-

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40991 Document: 00513768005 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/21/2016
No. 15-40991

2

Velasco was sentenced to 48 months of imprisonment, including a 16-level 

enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) on account of his conviction of 

second-degree kidnapping under North Carolina General Statutes § 14-39. 

Alvaro-Velasco contends that the district court “committed reversible plain 

error by convicting, sentencing, and entering judgment against Alvaro-Velasco

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) based on its determination that his prior kidnapping conviction qualified as a conviction for a ‘crime of violence’ under 18 U.S.C. 

§ 16(b) and thus one for an ‘aggravated felony’ under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(F).” 

Relying primarily on Johnson v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 2551 (2015), AlvaroVelasco maintains that the definition of a crime of violence in § 16(b), as 

incorporated by reference into the definition of an aggravated felony in 

§ 1101(a)(43)(F), is unconstitutionally vague on its face. He further contends 

that this court cannot apply § 16(b) in this case without violating due process. 

The government has filed an unopposed motion for summary affirmance, 

urging that Alvaro-Velasco’s reasoning is foreclosed by United States v. 

Gonzalez-Longoria, 831 F.3d 670 (5th Cir. 2016) (en banc), petition for cert. 

filed (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 16-6259). The government is correct that GonzalezLongoria forecloses Alvaro-Velasco’s facial vagueness challenge to § 16(b) and 

his challenge to our application of § 16(b) on due-process grounds.1 See id. Accordingly, the motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment 

is AFFIRMED. The government’s alternate motion for an extension of time to 

file a brief is DENIED as unnecessary.

 

1 The grant of certiorari on the issue whether § 16(b) is unconstitutional in light of 

Johnson in Lynch v. Dimaya, 2016 WL 3232911 (Sept. 29, 2016) (No. 15-1498), does not affect

the analysis. This court is bound by its own precedent unless and until it is altered by a

decision of the Supreme Court. See Wicker v. McCotter, 798 F.2d 155, 157–58 (5th Cir. 1986).

 Case: 15-40991 Document: 00513768005 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/21/2016
H 

1)-- -

t' 

\0 

t - -"' 

.... 

~ I 

1..I 1t 

... 1-

~ 

14 

""' <. 

, 

"&. 

3 

1-

~ 

(. 

,-

t 

"' J 

f 

f.,, 

? 

"" la 

4 

-

/OIOD 

-

-

- "' - :tS 

-

c_ 

.J) 

E" 

F 

Gr 

t\ 

, 

J - J<. 

IL. 

-:; 

0 

? 

Q. 

1 

T 

u 

w "' 

)Ci 

r 

pproved for Release by NSA on 09-10-2013 pursuant to E.0. 

135"26 
i 

~ -- ~- • I 

1 • 

1 .--y. 

I. ~ 

t--i , ~ .. 

-' -

[ 

• 

t 

. ) 

f 

1 

' 

L 

,. - -t 

"' I 

' I 

t .... t 

1 

~ t 

j 

{ 

r 

-· j 

-l 

I 

r 

-r 

{ 

.. 

• l 

t 

~ 

. I 

' 1 

\ 

L 

it 

~ 

- ~ 

~ 

I 

j 

t 

-t 

t 

+ -

1 

r -

. 

: 

I 

'1' 

- ~ .... r k 

I 

- ' 

.t 

I 

t I 

'1 

t 

• 

~ 

I 

Tt 1-

.. ·- ~ ~ 

i 

i~ ... l ' 

i I 

- t 11 

..-' 

L 

I 

_I ' 

t 

~ 

. 

-I 

1 

t 

' 1 

·-

-r 

' ,..._ 

I 

--' 

. ,. 

.,.-

l 

-{ 

I 

1-

, 

~ 

!. 

• 

:r 

I 

"'-" 

' ~ 

• 'i 

j 

' 

.: 

• r 

.. ""'---"" -

... 

.. 

. 

r 

-

! 

r 

-

-

REF 

C,·"' , 

ID :A67407• 

v PJ 

M :z. Ii I 

. ' 

.. 

~ 

I 

·. 

-, 

i 

. 

+ 

.. , 

r 

, 

• 

.. 

I 

' 

.. J 

-' 

.. .. 
. l .. A 

. 'L 

Q 

~ fl A E. 

~ \C.. 6 Q, ~ F c. '- .J> I .!) Gr 

'E J 

' 

REF ID:A67407 

A- ~ c:.. J> 

)

--=--- ·- -- -- --

._......-. 

. ) 

-

I 

• -----..) 

. 

A 

AcB~l)«' 

- - f' ~ 

.. 

e. I<. Q. t=' 

c. F I.. IQ. G1) ~ ~I'\~\\ 

E'. J"'N,-, 

-
0 

' 

,, 

0 \ 

o~ ' \ II 

. """ ,..J !i. 

~'~ ~ 

a 

I 

p 

\ 

REF ID:A67407 

\ 

~ ~ _'\"' r c. ., er' C\ (-0 \. \ 

.... -~ r·is ' --------- lo .,, $"" ~ c. 

'f 

~ ~"tl " , 11 1, 

1 :1 

I v/vrA )l(o 

-

-

-- -

- -

--"" --- -
Exhibit 7.1 

**Videotron Ltd.**

**Statement Regarding Calculation of Ratio of Earnings toFixed Charges as Disclosed in**

**Videotron Ltd.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the Year Ended December 31,2009**

For the purpose of calculating the ratio of earnings to fixed charges disclosed in VideotronLtd.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009, (i) earnings consist of net (loss) income plus non-controlling interest in a subsidiary, income taxes, fixed charges, amortized capitalized interest, lessinterest capitalized, and (ii) fixed charges consist of interest expensed and capitalized, excluding interest on QMI subordinated loans, plus amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses relating to indebtedness and an estimate of theinterest within rental expense.
#### McCormick Harvesting Machine Company, Respondent, vs. James, Garnishee, Appellant.

*March 22*

*April 11, 1893.*

*Justices' courts: Garnishment: Reopening case after judgment.*

After the entry of judgment against a garnishee a justice of the peace cannot reopen the case and adjourn the action, either of his own motion or with the consent of the garnishee; and a subsequent judgment against the garnishee is without jurisdiction.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Pooh*County.

Garnishment in justice’s court in aid of execution. After numerous adjournments a judgment was rendered against the garnishee, December 15,1891, for $25 and costs. After-wards, on the same day, the plaintiff, the garnishee defendant, James, and the main defendant, Reed, appeared by their attorneys, and agreed that said judgment be opened so that the case stand as it did before the entry of said, judgment, and that the action be adjourned to January 5, 1892, in accordance with which agreement the justice in form opened the judgment and adjourned the case' to the day stipulated. Upon said 5th of January, 1892, neither the defendant nor the garnishee appeared, and judgment was rendered against the garnishee for the $178.46, the amount of the judgment in the main action, with costs. The garnishee sued out a writ of *eertiorari*from the circuit court, and upon the justice’s return, showing, among other things, the foregoing facts, the justice’s judgment was affirmed, and the garnishee appealed.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Smith &*Pieree, and oral argument by *William Smith*and *F. G. Burpee.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Doe & Sutherland,*and oral argument' by *J. B. Doe.*

*601Wis.] JANUAEY TEEM, 1893. Merchants’ & Mechanics’ Savings Bank vs. Lovejoy.

Winslow, J.

This judgment must be reversed. After the. entry of the judgment against the garnishee of December 15, 1891, it is clear that the justice could not, of his own motion, reopen the case and adjourn the action to a future date. Unless the consent of the garnishee gave him 'the power and restored his jurisdiction, he could not do it at all. ‘ It is well settled in this state that a garnishee cannot,, by voluntary appearance, confer jurisdiction or waive the requirements of the statute. The statute must be strictly pursued in order to confer jurisdiction of a garnishee action. Edler *v.*Hasche, 67 Wis. 653, and cases there cited.

■ *By the*Court.— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to reverse the judgment of the justice.
Exhibit 32.1
Section 906 Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Zarlink  Semiconductor  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  December 26, 2003 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Patrick J.  Brockett,  President  and Chief  Executive  Officer of the  Company,
certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: February 5, 2004

                                           /s/ PATRICK J. BROCKETT
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Patrick J. Brockett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to Zarlink  Semiconductor  Inc. and
will be retained by Zarlink  Semiconductor  Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       32