IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

Assigned on Briefs January 23, 2001

MICHAEL WAYNE DEAN v. STATE OF TENNESSEE

 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bledsoe County

No. 10881 Buddy D. Perry, Judge

No. E2000-01452-CCA-R3-PC 

March 21, 2001

The petitioner challenges the trial court’s dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief. He

contends that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter a judgment for second degree murder because

that offense is not a lesser included offense of felony murder with which he was indicted. We affirm

the trial court’s dismissal of the habeas corpus petition. 

Tenn. R. App. P. 3 Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court Affirmed

JOSEPH M. TIPTON,J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which GARY R. WADE, P.J., and JAMES

CURWOOD WITT, JR., J., joined.

Michael Wayne Dean, Pikeville, Tennessee, Pro Se.

Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter; Clinton J. Morgan, Counsel for the State; and

James Michael Taylor, District Attorney General, for the appellee, State of Tennessee.

ORDER

The petitioner, Michael Wayne Dean, appeals as of right the Bledsoe County Circuit Court’s

dismissal of his petition for habeas corpus relief. He is presently serving a fifteen-year sentence as

a Violent Offender for his September 10, 1999 conviction pursuant to a guilty plea to second degree

murder, a Class A felony. The petitioner contends that the trial court was without jurisdiction or

authority to enter this judgment because second degree murder is not a lesser included offense of his

indicted offense of felony murder. The state contends that the trial court properly dismissed the

petition because the judgment is not void on its face. It notes that the judgment reflects that the

petitioner agreed to the amended charge of second degree murder. We affirm the trial court’s

dismissal of the petition pursuant to Rule 20, Tenn. Ct. Crim. App. R.

A petition for the writ of habeas corpus may be brought if the judgment is void or the

sentence has expired. Archer v. State, 851 S.W.2d 157, 164 (Tenn. 1993). However, if the claimed

illegality renders the judgment or sentence voidable, rather than void, no relief can be granted. Id.
-2-

at 161. “If the face of the record shows that the court did not have jurisdiction, then the judgment

is void.” Dykes v. Compton, 978 S.W.2d 528, 529 (Tenn. 1998). Thus, we examine the judgment

on its face to determine whether it is void. Here, the judgment of conviction states that the petitioner

pled guilty to the amended charge of second degree murder. A defendant may agree to the

amendment of the indictment. Tenn. R. Crim. P. 7(b). Such an agreement remedies any potential

defect in the conviction for second degree murder. See Charles K. Hunter v. Ricky Bell, Warden,

No. 01C01-9807-CR-00316, Davidson County, slip op. at 3 (Tenn. Crim. App. July 9, 1999)

(holding that a judgment reflecting an agreed amendment of attempted first degree murder to

aggravated assault forecloses any argument that aggravated assault is not a lesser included offense

of attempted first degree murder). The judgment is valid upon its face.

After a full consideration of the record, the briefs, and the law governing the issues presented,

we are of the opinion that the evidence justifies the trial court’s dismissal of the habeas corpus

petition and that no error of law exists that would require a reversal. Therefore, we order that the

judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tenn. Ct. Crim. App. R., and that

the case be remanded to the Circuit Court of Bledsoe County for the execution of judgment and the

collection of costs accrued below. It appearing that the petitioner is indigent, the costs of the appeal

are taxed to the State of Tennessee. 

___________________________________ 

JOSEPH M. TIPTON, JUDGE

___________________________________

GARY R. WADE, PRESIDING JUDGE

____________________________________

JAMES CURWOOD WITT, JR., JUDGE