alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          40,170
<SECURITIES>                                     6,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                  114,408
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,442
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               169,371
<PP&E>                                          30,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                  22,884
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 265,073
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,484
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           321
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   265,073
<SALES>                                        100,740
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               100,740
<CGS>                                           42,503
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,503
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                49,238
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,567
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,419
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,148
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          25,400
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  359,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,200
<INVENTORY>                                    278,300
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               689,400
<PP&E>                                         594,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 258,500
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,560,100
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          597,300
<BONDS>                                      1,737,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     54,600
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,067,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,560,100
<SALES>                                      1,861,300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,861,300
<CGS>                                          686,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  686,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 7,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             147,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (361,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (370,300)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (370,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
| **EXHIBIT 32.3**                                  |
|---------------------------------------------------|
|                                              |
| **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**                     |
| **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**                       |
| **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                        |
| **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** |

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 2, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jonathan S. Huberman, Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| /s/ Jonathan S. Huberman |
|--------------------------|

Jonathan S. Huberman

Vice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

May 11, 2006

 

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Iomega Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
null

245.20157
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas E. McGuire,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Thomas E. McGuire

Thomas E. McGuireChief Financial OfficerMarch 10,
2005

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1992 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1992

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to provide that a 
member of the Armed Forces and the spouse of that member shall have the 
 same rights regarding the receipt of firearms at the location of any 
                      duty station of the member.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2015

 Mr. Rounds (for himself, Mr. Thune, Mr. Daines, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Enzi, 
and Mr. Crapo) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to provide that a 
member of the Armed Forces and the spouse of that member shall have the 
 same rights regarding the receipt of firearms at the location of any 
                      duty station of the member.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Our Military Families' 2nd 
Amendment Rights Act''.

SEC. 2. RECEIPT OF FIREARM OR AMMUNITION BY SPOUSE OF MEMBER OF THE 
              ARMED FORCES AT A DUTY STATION OF THE MEMBER OUTSIDE THE 
              UNITED STATES.

    Section 925(a)(3) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, or to the spouse of such a member,'' 
        before ``or to'';
            (2) by striking ``members,'' and inserting ``members and 
        spouses,'';
            (3) by striking ``members or'' and inserting ``members, 
        spouses, or''; and
            (4) by striking ``member or'' and inserting ``member, 
        spouse, or''.

SEC. 3. RESIDENCY OF SPOUSES OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES TO BE 
              DETERMINED ON THE SAME BASIS AS THE RESIDENCY OF SUCH 
              MEMBERS FOR PURPOSES OF FEDERAL FIREARMS LAWS.

    Section 921(b) of title 18, United States Code, is amended to read 
as follows:
    ``(b) For purposes of this chapter, a member of the Armed Forces on 
active duty, or a spouse of such a member, is a resident of--
            ``(1) the State in which the member or spouse maintains 
        legal residence;
            ``(2) the State in which the permanent duty station of the 
        member is located; and
            ``(3) the State in which the member maintains a place of 
        abode from which the member commutes each day to the permanent 
        duty station of the member.''.

SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply to conduct engaged in 
after the 6-month period that begins on the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel
M. Healy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. /s/ Daniel M. Healy  
 May 10, 2004 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to North Fork
Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by North Fork Bancorporation, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

         In connection with the accompanying Annual Report of DF China
Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended March 31,
2003 (the "Report"), I, Dr. Fan Di, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Section 78m
or Section 78o(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: October 15, 2003

                                         /s/ DR. FAN DI
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Dr. Fan Di
                                         Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

         The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 20-F or as a separate disclosure document.

                                                                    Exhibit 12.2
                                                                Page 1 of 1 Page
.. -· REF ID: A6655°9 

SUBJECT1 Priority of Safeguarding Classified 

Information 

1'01 See Below FROE: AFSA-16 DATE: 22 NoveM.ber 1950 COMMENT NO. 1 

Lt. Co 1. MELICK/:::61/wls 

1. It is proposed to make a study of the advisability and fonsibility 

of ~..arking the receptacles of .AFSA classified material, as woll as o.11 areas 

in which classified material may be stored, in the order of their pri0rity 

for snlvag_o, in ca.se of' fire, or destruction, in case of an~· emer1-cncy. 

2. Fri or to r•i8.kinf: such a study, howevGr, tho answers to the followi.nt 

questions a.re desircld from tho addressees: 

a. Is t~1e classified material in your offico or staf r di vision 

so storuo. that it may be mo.rked a.nd so.sily identified by an off'icer r.ot 

fully familiar with your urea'? 

b. Is it possible to seg,rc~:J.te the. classified !.!aterio.l in your 

possession into approxi~atoly throe (3) co.togorios? 

1. To be sc.vc,d or destroyed (as the cuso maybe) under c.ny 

circumsto.nccs. 

2. To be saved or destroyed if timo pcr~its •• 

3. Easily rcpla.coa.blo in case of fir0 or v.Jry little do.nf:cr 

of compromise under other circumsto.nces. 

3. AnsW'Jr to the abovo questions nrc desired by AFSA-16 not le.tor 

than 13 December 1950. 

4. Any sug cations regarding the above which nrc croo.bcd by spuci~l 

condHions in ony office. or sto.ff division vrill be, npprocir.bod. 

Distribution: 

A FSA-OOA 

AFSA .. OOB 

li.FSA-OOC 

A FSA-OOF 

AFSA-OOT 

l..FSJ-1. .. 00X 

.AFSA-02 

AFSA-03 

Al''SA-04 

AFSA-10 

At<-SA-11 

A FSA-12 

AFSL:i.-13 

AFS . .:\-14 

AFSA-15 

,. t. / ~ -t 

, 

CARLOS F. ~:ELICK 

Lt. Colonol, CE~ USA 

Chief~ Security Control Division 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-08-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
March 28, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KATHERINE MARCUM, Appellant

NO. 14-13-00198-CV V.

DOW CORNING CORPORATION AND 

DOW CORNING WRIGHT CORPORATION, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

order signed by the court below on January 29, 2013. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Katherine Marcum.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44210

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

PATRICK ADAM THOMETZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 780

Filed: November 18, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Minidoka County. Hon. Michael R. Crabtree, District Judge. 

Order denying I.C.R. 35 motion for reduction of sentence, affirmed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, Interim State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. 

Swinford, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GRATTON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM 

Patrick Adam Thometz pled guilty to grand theft. I.C. §§ 18-2403(1) and 18-

2407(1)(b)(8). In exchange for his guilty plea, additional charges were dismissed including an 

allegation that he was a persistent violator. The district court sentenced Thometz to a unified 

term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. The district court 

ordered that Thometz’s sentence run concurrent with two unrelated sentences. The district court 

retained jurisdiction and sent Thometz to participate in the rider program. Following successful 

completion of his rider, the district court suspended the sentence and placed Thometz on 

probation. Thereafter, Thometz admitted to violating the terms of his probation. The district 
2

court revoked probation, ordered execution of Thometz’s original sentence, and again retained 

jurisdiction. Thometz filed an I.C.R 35 motion, which the district court denied. Thometz filed a 

motion for reconsideration of the denial of his Rule 35 motion and requested that the district 

court relinquish jurisdiction. The district court treated Thometz’s motion as an amended Rule 35 

motion, denied the motion, and relinquished jurisdiction. Thometz appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 

presenting a Rule 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including any new information submitted with Thometz’s Rule 35 motion, we conclude 

no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying Thometz’s 

Rule 35 motion is affirmed.
November 6 , 2012



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MELVIN I. ALVARADO , Appellant
NO. 14

- 12

- 00179

- CR V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


   We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Edge Petroleum
Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement on Form S-8 No. 333-22571
of our summary report dated March 27, 1998 included as Exhibit 99.1 to this
Annual Report on Form 10-K and the data extracted from our reports and the
references to our firm appearing in "Items 1 and 2. "Business and Properties"
under the caption "Oil and Gas Reserves" and in Supplemental Financial
Information on Oil and Natural Gas Exploration, Development and Production
Activities (unaudited) in such Annual Report on Form 10-K.



                                /S/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                     PETROLEUM ENGINEER...
                                -----------------------------
                                    RYDER SCOTT COMPANY
                                    PETROLEUM ENGINEERS



Houston, Texas
March 27, 1998
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY>   US DOLLARS   
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1000
<CASH>                                          35,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,802
<PP&E>                                          14,727
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (5,050)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,929
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,780
<BONDS>                                             69
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,929
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,834
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  119,449
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,700)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,085
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,085
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,085
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
Mr. Loftus Becker, 

2430 E Street, N. W., 

Washington, D. c. 

Dear Loftus : 

0 0 

p p 

y y 

STUART HEDDEN 

New Milford 

Connecticut 

I have heard from Boris who 

• 

June 19, 1951. 

He ..... .....,..,...-~.....,.,=-~~~~..,..,....,....-~~~.,...-~...,...,.~.....,........,..~-=~~-.,..~~...,.......,.......,..,... 

vtrites: 11 I am sorry this was not mentioned when I was there, but it was 

not a nevi.thing and there were necessarily several details which were 

forgotten at those meetings. 11 

He also sends me other interesting information which you should 

consider: He has recently visited S.iemens in Munich at their request. 

During the war Siemens manufactured large numbers of ciphering teletype 

machines of a very complicated nature. They have now put on the market 

a new teletype of excellent design m ich is. selling fast. They have inquiries for ciphering devices for use with these machines, and unless 

they obtain a collaborator who can deliver such devices they will start 

such manufacturing themselves. Restrictions as to the manufacturing of 

ciphering machines in Germany have been removed. Siemens prefer not to 

manufacture themselves, but there is a reputable conc~rn in Germany which 

would not only like to make these devices but also ci h."erin machines of 

the Hebren or Eni t e. 

EO 3_

3(h)(2peclassified and apprnved for release bv NSA on 11-1_3-2014 pursuant to E.O. 13529 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 SJ.ncerely, . /~ -

0CCP SE:RE). Stuar:t
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Conseco Finance


                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements of
Conseco Finance Corp. (formerly Green Tree Financial Corporation) (File Nos.
333-85037, 333-92315, 333- 85119, 333-92313, 333-52233, 333-75375 and 333-91557)
of our report dated April 13, 2000, on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Conseco Finance Corp. as of December 31, 1999 and 1998 and for the
years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, which report is included in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.


                                                /s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
                                                --------------------------------
                                                PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
April 13, 2000