alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2014287EN.01000102.xml

| 28.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7182 — Visteon Corporation/Automotive Electronics Business of Johnson Controls)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 287/02

On 16 May 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7182. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7182. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
(4910-13-P)

,IOUS'•••• lIOl

KOU'rING SYMBOl. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14CFR Part 39 

# I\\\ [Docket No. FAA-2009-***i<*j Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-147-AD] RlN 2120-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Model CL-600-2 10(Regional Jet Series 700, 70] & 702), CL-600-2D 15(Regional Jet Series 705), and CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew ainvorthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory 

### ebntinUing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation autbority or anotber country to identitY and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. T e MeAl describes the unsafe condition as: During anelevator Power Control Unit (PCU) Ce9tering Functional Check on two CL~600-2C10 aircraft., sust.ainedoS(I;illationswere discovered when a control rod was disconnected. these sustained oscillat.ions could render the elevator surface inop~rable and cause subsequent loss ofpitch control ofthe aircraft
. 

# Dh/ 'I IlO11Tu"G $\'MIlOL 

# -7 I~ITIAL.~'S'C; 

### C-~ I)~TU 

# H'"'/~"t ~OUTI~(;SYMBOL 

## -/1+

MU 

## 11-2.0-lJ1 IN(; SI"lo"'''L 

## -·01

IN<TlAU\i~IG

DATE

oVrmCSYMllOl



### * 

# • * 

# • • • • Loss ofpitch control could result in reduced controllabilittYofthe airplane. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in tbe MCAI.DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Avilltion Administration 14 Cli'R })art 39 C<J.-.o.."'.~""" 

### 14910~13-PI

~71!l~~iOC

'~'H'" ULC C.,\l1i. " 

## c. <l'Tf 

## 09/,4- 09 "o,n,,'1;S\"""" 1
..(i]JIAJ,;O

RlN 2120-AA64 (DocketNo.l?AA-2009-***"""; nirectorate Identifier 20109-NM-147-AI>I 

# I Ainl'orthincss Dircctn.'cSj Bombardier Model CL-600-2il 0 (Regional Jet Series 700, 701 & 702), CL.-600-2D IS (Rcgional Jet Series 705), llnd IL-600-2D24 (Regional Jel Series 900) Airplancs AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT ACTION: Noti,e of proposed rulc!I111king (NPRM). SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness di ective (AD) for the products listed above. This proposed AD resul!s from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MeAl) originated byan aviation authority ofLlOther country toidentify Ilndcorrect an unsafe condition on nnaviation product. ThJ MeAl describes the unsafe condition ns: During an elevator Power COl1lrollJnit (peU) Ccntpring Functional Check on two CL-600-2CIO aircraft, sustained oscillations were discovered when acontrol rod was disconnected. These sustaim:d oscillations could render the elevator surface inoperable and cause subsequent loss ofpitch control ofthe aircraft
. 

## , 

# • • , • • Loss of pilch control could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. The proposed b,,~,,~. --_. AD would require actions that are intended to addre~s the nsafc condilion described in the MeAl.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 29, 2010 

p0322 

Order 

 

March 29, 2010 

139782 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139782 

 COA: 292593 

Berrien CC: 07-403294-FH; 

CHRISTOPHER SHAUN HAZEN, 07-403644; 07-403645-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 27, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Writ of Mandamus Denied and Opin ion F iled January 6. 2014. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 13
- 01656
- CV IN RE MARY CANDACE E VANS , Relator
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 3 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 12
- 06268
- C



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Moseley, Fillmore, and Brown Opinion by Justice Moseley

Relator contend s the trial court erred in granting the motio n of Dr. Richard Malouf and Leanne Malouf to Strike the Hearing of Relator’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to T EX . C IV
. P RAC . & R EM . C ODE Section 27. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount the m herein. We conclude relator ’s petition does not satisfy the requirements of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 52.3(j); In re Butler , 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.

– Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamu s.

131656F.P05 /Jim Moseley/ JIM MOSELEY JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
FERROFLUIDICS CORPORATION'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AS OF DECEMBER 27, 1997
AND FOR ITS CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS THEN ENDED AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH QUARTERLY STATEMENT ON FORM
10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 27, 1997.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000353286
<NAME> FERROFLUIDICS CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-29-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,130,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               17,168,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   222,000
<INVENTORY>                                 13,941,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,005,000
<PP&E>                                      21,449,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,541,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              49,016,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       20,969,000
<BONDS>                                      5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    36,631,000
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,753,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                49,016,000
<SALES>                                     30,765,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            30,765,000
<CGS>                                       21,286,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               21,286,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             7,410,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             538,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,439,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                   171,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
· REF ID:A.5.7236 ' 

e 

· Office Memorandum • UNITED sTATEs GovERNMENT 

TO DATE: 14 .April 1950 

SUBJECT: 

It :l• _,-opinion that .AJ'BA'• awn camun1cation c1rcu1:t81 1.e., those to 

:I.ta tie1cl actirtties, require apeci&lly C&l'ef'u.l aurveillance tor aeeurity 

psrposea.. Thi• !a properl)- a :tunc:t1Clll <rt ~.. What can be ®ne about the 

pro bl.eat 

I •I ...,. .• " VElfGKR 

Captain, U.S. kv.r 

l)eputJ' Director I JiJ'SA 

• 

' 

·' 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 05-19-2014 purs __ uantto E .0. 1352a
# EXHIBIT 32.3

# CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Werner T. Heid, President and Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Werner T. Heid
Werner T. Heid
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 12, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Iomega Corporation and will be retained by
Iomega Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# • 

# Formed June 2011 – Denver Based 

# • 

# Founding Partners • 

# Michael Kennedy, President – CEO • 

# David Wheeler, Executive VP – Geoscience • 

# Stephen Harpham – Executive VP – Engineering

• 

# EnCap Investments Private Equity Partner
• 

# Midcontinent (OK-KS-TX Panhandle) Area
• 

# Miss Lime Play Focused 23 Source: SandRidge August investor presentation. 

# • 

# 4 Focus Areas • 110M gross 74M net Acres 

# • 11 HZ & 8 SWD wells 

# • 2 rig program 2H2013 

# • Elk 

## • Chautauqua/Elk KS 

## • ENE Extension 

# • SEML, 

## • Noble/Logan OK 

## • East of Nemaha Ridge 

# • Langdon 

## • Reno KS 

## • Northern Development Area 

# • Stateline 

## • Woods OK/Barber KS 

## • Western Core 

### Dorado Focus AreasDorado Bush Hz Bush SWD

4  

## NW Core Area  

## Dorado  4 Miss HZ, 3 SWD wells  ~15,500 Gross ~12,750 net acres  95% HBP  

## Area of High Activity  

## Increased Density Drilling  4-5 wells per section  Infrastructure Concentration  SWD Gathering Systems  Centralized Disposal Facilities  

## Opportunities  3 rd party disposal  Iodine recovery  Produced Water for Stimulation  Water Recycling Higher Density Development Widespread Higher Density Development Barber County KS Woods County OK 

## Northern Development Area  

## Dorado  5 Miss HZ, 4 SWD wells  ~46,250 Gross / ~30,700 net acres  1 rig in 2H2013  

## Area of High Activity  Shell –
▪ ~10 Hz/9 SWD wells drilled ▪ Additional Locations permitted  Unit – ▪ 7 Hz wells drilled / 4 wells WOPL ▪ Type curve 125-180 MBOE (92% oil) 40-70% ROR (Unit Website 2013) ▪ Superior Pipeline installing new gathering system and NGL plant  

## Miss Lime Congress Challenge: Be open and honest with each other and share your specific experiences and results for the greater good Dorado Fesler Production

Results Dorado Activity

Area Shell area of activity

Unit Overall 1-21H IP30: 323 BOPD Unit Area of

Activity

Shell area of activity
56 

## IP(30) 281 MCFD IP(30) 1500 GOR IP(30) 2470 BWPD IP(30) 181 BOPD

CWC $2.9MM

## • 

# The Miss Lime presents numerous challenges: This Congress addresses Recovery Optimization

• 

# Day 1: Produced Water Management Costs
• 

# All encompassing analysis of produced water • 

# Expert Speakers from a diverse group of companies active in the play

• 

# Day 2: Optimizing Production • 

# Artificial Lift challenges and solutions • 

# Maximizing Oil production and minimizing cost 7

# • 

# General Comments • 

# Tight schedule we all need to adhere to • 

# Be interactive with the speakers & ask questions • 

# Be open and share with your colleagues

• 

# Visit with the Sponsors and Exhibitors
• 

# Part of the learning experience
• 

# Actively providing solutions to our challenges

8
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17D0143. PHILLIP RAGLAND v. THE STATE.

On August 18, 2016, the trial court entered an order revoking PhillipRagland’s

probation. On October 17, 2016, Ragland filed this application for discretionary

appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

An application for discretionary appeal must be filed within 30 days of entry

of the order or judgment to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-35 (d). The requirements of

OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional, and this Court cannot accept an application for

appeal not made in compliance therewith. Boyle v. State, 190 Ga. App. 734 (380

SE2d 57) (1989). This application, filed 60 days after entry of the challenged order,

is untimely and is therefore DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/02/2016

November 02, 2016
# C_2014182EN.01002801.xml

| 14.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 182/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 182/28

---

Corrigendum to the call for expressions of interest for scientific experts for membership of the Scientific Panels and the Scientific Committee of the European Food Safety Authority (Parma, Italy)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 106 of 9 April 2014
  )

Official Journal of the European Union C 106 of 9 April 2014

2014/C 182/09

On page 26, ‘11. Closing date for sending applications’, first paragraph:

for:

for:

‘... 18 June 2014 at midnight ...’,

read:

read:

‘... 7 July 2014 at midnight ...’.

---
# C_2014144EN.01001101.xml

| 14.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/11

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

13 May 2014

(2014/C 144/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3703 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 140,25 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4639 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,81395 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 8,9910 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2201 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,1300 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,404 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 303,33 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1854 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4313 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8393 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4625 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4935 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,6222 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5850 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7167 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 401,13 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1415 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,5375 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5890 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 783,63 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,4377 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,984 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 47,8174 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,699 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0359 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7166 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,7015 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3703

JPY

Japanese yen

140,25

DKK

Danish krone

7,4639

GBP

Pound sterling

0,81395

SEK

Swedish krona

8,9910

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2201

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,1300

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,404

HUF

Hungarian forint

303,33

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1854

RON

Romanian leu

4,4313

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8393

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4625

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4935

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,6222

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5850

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7167

KRW

South Korean won

1 401,13

ZAR

South African rand

14,1415

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,5375

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5890

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 783,63

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,4377

PHP

Philippine peso

59,984

RUB

Russian rouble

47,8174

THB

Thai baht

44,699

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0359

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7166

INR

Indian rupee

81,7015

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-7884

CLINTON HILL, 

 Petitioner - Appellant, 

 v. 

GENE M. JOHNSON, 

 Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:09-cv-00193-JBF-JEB) 

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 28, 2010 

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Clinton Hill, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Hyman Katz, Assistant 

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Clinton Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). 

A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this 

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find 

that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district 

court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural 

ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El 

v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th 

Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and 

conclude that Hill has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# DATES AND TIMES: 

April 13, 2015, at 2 p.m., and April 14, 2015, at 8:30 a.m.

# PLACE: 

San Mateo, California.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

## Matters To Be Considered

### Monday, April 13, 2015, at 2 p.m.

1. Personnel Matters and Compensation Issues.

2. Strategic Issues.

### Tuesday, April 14, 2015, at 8:30 a.m.

1. Strategic Issues (Continued).

2. Financial Matters.

3. Pricing.

4. Governors' Executive Session—Discussion of prior agenda items and Board governance.

*General Counsel Certification:*                     The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

*Contact Person For More Information:*                     Requests for information about the meeting should be addressed to the Secretary of the Board, Julie S. Moore, at 202-268-4800.                

Julie S. Moore,

Secretary, Board of Governors.

[FR Doc. 2015-05863 Filed 3-11-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Cedric Charles Lister, Appellant

No. 06-16-00065-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 278th District Court of 

Walker County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 27141). 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Cedric Charles Lister, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 21, 2016

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

People of Michigan v Michael Daniel Jeffries 

Docket No. 328 120 

LC No. 14-006242-FC 

Cynthia Diane Stephens 

Presiding Judge 

Henry William Saad 

Patrick M. Meter 

Judges 

The Coun orders that the October I 0, 2016 opi nion is hereby AMENDED to correct a 

clerical error. The opinion is corrected to read November I 0, 20 16 as the date of the opinjon. 

In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy cnkrcd and cc11ilied by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr.. Chief Clerk, on 

NOV 16 2016 

Date 

~~~ ' -L- hic~