alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461*et seq.*) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a savings association and nonbanking companies owned by the savings and loan holding company, including the companies listed below.                

The applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards in section 10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 13, 2015.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland (Nadine Wallman, Vice President) 1455 East Sixth Street, Cleveland, Ohio 44101-2566:

                    1.                     *CF Mutual Holding Company and CF Bancorp, Inc.,*                     both in Cincinnati, Ohio; to become a savings and loan holding companies upon the conversion of Cincinnati Federal Savings Loan Association, Cincinnati, Ohio, which is converting from mutual to stock form.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 13, 2015.

Michael J. Lewandowski,

Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2015-06197 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           40247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   376252
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     351679
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1155525
<PP&E>                                         1479407
<DEPRECIATION>                                  724600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2482854
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1055490
<BONDS>                                         373704
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        147295
<OTHER-SE>                                      703193
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2482854
<SALES>                                        1780935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1780935
<CGS>                                          1484681
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1484681
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                153931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               26280
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 116832
<INCOME-TAX>                                     35049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              81783
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     81783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.57
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1529

ROSAURA GUADALUPE BONILLA-MINERO,

Petitioner,

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Submitted: March 16, 2023 Decided: March 20, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Mary Lynn A. Tedesco, TEDESCO LEGAL, PC, Charlotte, North Carolina, 

for Petitioner. Brian Boynton, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Justin Markel, 

Senior Litigation Counsel, Andrew Oliveira, Trial Attorney, Office of Immigration 

Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, 

D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1529 Doc: 21 Filed: 03/20/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Rosaura Guadalupe Bonilla-Minero, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions 

for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissing her appeal from the 

immigration judge’s oral decision denying Bonilla-Minero’s applications for asylum and 

withholding of removal.∗

 Upon review of the administrative record in conjunction with

the arguments raised in this court, we are satisfied that the record evidence does not compel 

a ruling contrary to any of the administrative factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), 

and that the agency did not err in concluding that Bonilla-Minero’s advanced particular 

social group was not cognizable, see Morales v. Garland, 51 F.4th 553, 557-58

(4th Cir. 2022) (discussing cognizability requirements). Nor does the record show that the 

Board abused its discretion in not referring Bonilla-Minero’s administrative appeal to a 

three-member panel. See Quinteros-Mendoza v. Holder, 556 F.3d 159, 164 (4th Cir. 2009) 

(providing standard of review for this issue).

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

In re Bonilla-Minero (B.I.A. Apr. 18, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

∗ Bonilla-Minero does not challenge the denial of her request for protection under 

the Convention Against Torture (CAT). Accordingly, this issue is waived. See Fed. R. 

App. P. 28(a)(8)(A); Cortez-Mendez v. Whitaker, 912 F.3d 205, 208 (4th Cir. 2019) 

(explaining that petitioner’s failure to address the denial of CAT relief waives the issue).

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1529 Doc: 21 Filed: 03/20/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
ex10-6





 







Exhibit 10.6


 



TRIO-TECH INTERNATIONAL



AMENDMENT TO 2017 DIRECTORS EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN


 



    Section 4 of the 2017 Directors Equity
Incentive Plan of Trio-Tech International is amended to read in its
entirety as follows:


 



"4.           Stock
Subject to Plan.  There shall be reserved for issue
upon the exercise of options granted, or restricted stock awarded,
under the Plan 600,000 shares of Common Stock or the number of
shares of Common Stock which, in accordance with the provisions of
Section 9 hereof, shall be substituted therefor. Such shares may be
authorized but unissued shares or treasury shares. If an option
granted under the Plan shall expire or terminate for any reason
without having been exercised in full, unpurchased shares subject
thereto shall again be available for the purposes of the
Plan..”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                       2,007,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  212,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,536,000
<PP&E>                                       4,224,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  96,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,767,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,030,000
<BONDS>                                        875,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,328,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,767,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               367,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               502,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (361,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (361,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 36,000
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (325,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.07)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2337 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2337

 To prohibit the imposition of mask mandates on public transportation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 14, 2021

Mr. Paul (for himself, Mr. Braun, Mr. Cotton, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Wicker, 
and Mrs. Blackburn) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 
and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the imposition of mask mandates on public transportation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Travel Mask Mandate Repeal Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN MASK MANDATES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal agency shall impose any Federal requirement related to COVID-19 
that an individual wear a face mask when utilizing any conveyance (as 
defined in section 70.1 of title 42, Code of Federal Regulations, or 
any successor regulation) or transportation hub.
    (b) Limitation on Existing Orders.--Effective on the date of 
enactment of this Act, the order issued on January 29, 2021, by the 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention under section 361 of the 
Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 264) establishing a requirement 
for persons to wear masks while on conveyances and at transportation 
hubs, as well as any other related order, directive, and emergency 
amendment of the Transportation Security Administration (including 
those described in EA 1546-21-01A, SD 1542-21-01A, SD 1544-21-02A, SD 
1582-84-21-01A, EA 1546-21-01, SD 1542-21-01, SD 1544-21-02, and SD 
1582/84-21-01) shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Walter Clark, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Air T, Inc.;
 2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants independent registered public accountants and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: November 8, 2005
 /s/ Walter Clark
 Walter Clark
 Chief Executive Officer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 17, 2016

NO. 03-16-00456-CR

Gregory Chris Angelo, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 27TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying DNA testing. Having reviewed the record 

and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the order.

Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order denying DNA testing. Because appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
,. 

·- c 

0 

p 

y 

• ~~J?;;A67500. 

CONJIDLl\1. lfUWAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF TH:C CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

\VASHINGTON 

March 12, 1936 

Memorandum For Messrs. William F. Friedman 

and Frank B. Rowlett, 

W.P. and T. Division, 

Office of the Chief Signal Officer, 

Munitions Building, Washington, D. c. 

Subject: Improvement in Cryptographs 

New Patent Application 

1. The documents and drawings for the above entitled patent 

application have now been completed and are submitted herewith for 

approval and execution prior to the filing of the application in the 

Patent Of"fice. 

2. In executing the application, each of you gentlemen should 

be careful to sign his full first, middle initial and last names at 

the three places indicated in pencil and then take acknowledgment to 

the oath before a notary public who must also sign and impress his notarial seal. If any changes or corrections are deemed necessary or desirable, please indicate the same in the carbon copy sent for purposes 

of checking. One set of photostatic copies of the drawings is also transmitted at this time for purposes of checking. 

3. Your attention is called to the fact that this application 

has been placed in a secret category and the Patents Section has been 

directed to take the necessary steps to invoke the provisions of Section 

4894 R.S. in accordance vrith the procedure initiated by the Chief Signal 

Officer under date or August 21, 1935. When this application has received 

a formal date of filing and Serial Number in the Patent Office, necessary 

steps will be taken to comp)J with the requirement just mentioned and appropriate documents will be prepared for that purpose. 

Charles A. Rowe, 

Patents Section, Signal Corps. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

IN RE THE PETITION OF

CARRIE LA SEUR

PR 21-0004

ORDER

Carrie La Seur has petitioned this Court for admission to active status in the State

Bar of Montana after having been on inactive status since February 2019.

IT IS ORDERED that upon payment of the appropriate fees to the State Bar of

Montana, Petitioner shall be admitted to the active practice of law in the state of Montana.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within six months of the date of this Order,

Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena,

MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of approved Continuing Legal Education to

be credited to the time Petitioner was on inactive status.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to Petitioner and to the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this y day of May, 2021.

For the Court,

Bowe r) 

Cireenvv Court

ood

Cterk 

Sup Montana

reme

State of 

05/04/2021

Case Number: PR 21-0004
November 17, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MIGUEL MARTINEZ, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00731-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATIONS    1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (the Report) of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation
    (the Registrant);2.
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this Report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this Report;4.
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
    Exchange Act Rules
    13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f))
    for the Registrant and have:          5.
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have
    disclosed, based on the Companys most recent evaluation of
    internal control over financial reporting, to the
    Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
    Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
    equivalent functions):
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0169 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. KAYLEA LYNN MULLENDORE,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including August 9, 2023 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 3 2023

07/03/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0169
Dismissed and Opinion Filed July 2, 2018 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-01397-CV 

RICHARD J. BACON, Appellant 

V. 

NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00603-E 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Evans, and Justice Brown 

Opinion by Chief Justice Wright 

Appellant’s brief in this case is overdue.1 By letter dated February 23, 2018, we notified 

appellant the brief received by the Court on February 6, 2018 was deficient. We noted the 

numerous ways in which appellant’s brief did not comply with rule 38 of the Texas Rules of 

Appellate Procedure. Because neither the clerk’s record nor the reporter’s record had yet been 

filed, we also informed appellant that his amended brief complying with rule 38 was not due until 

thirty days after the record had been filed. To date, appellant has not filed an amended brief, filed 

an extension motion, nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal.

 1

 Appellant filed a docketing statement on February 6, 2018, indicating he had not requested a reporter’s record. Therefore, the deadline for 

filing appellant’s brief was thirty days after the clerk’s record was filed. 
 –2– 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1); 42.3(b), (c).

171397F.P05 

 

/Carolyn Wright/ 

CAROLYN WRIGHT 

CHIEF JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

RICHARD J. BACON, Appellant 

No. 05-17-01397-CV V. 

NAVIENT SOLUTIONS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 5, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-17-00603-E. 

Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright. 

Justices Evans and Brown participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 

Judgment entered July 2, 2018