alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

Set forth below is a list of certain of the Registrants subsidiaries. Such subsidiaries are incorporated or organized in the jurisdictions indicated. Each of the listed subsidiaries is wholly owned by the Registrant, directly or indirectly, and all listed subsidiaries are included in the Registrants consolidated financial statements. The names of the Registrants remaining subsidiaries, if any, which may have been omitted from the following list, considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, would not constitute a significant subsidiary.

Domestic Subsidiaries

Almay, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Charles of the Ritz Group Ltd., a Delaware corporation

Charles Revson Inc., a New York corporation

Cosmetics & More Inc., a Delaware corporation

North America Revsale Inc., a New York corporation

PPI Two Corporation, a Delaware corporation

Revlon Consumer Corp., a Delaware corporation

Revlon Development Corp., a Delaware corporation

Revlon Government Sales, Inc., a Delaware corporation

Revlon International Corporation, a Delaware corporation

Revlon Products Corp., a Delaware corporation

Revlon Real Estate Corporation, a Delaware corporation

RIROS Corporation, a New York corporation

RIROS Group Inc., a Delaware corporation

Foreign Subsidiaries

ACN 000 189 186 Pty. Limited (Australia)

CEIL  Comercio e Distribuidora Ltda. (Brazil)

Cendico B.V. (Netherlands)

Deutsche Revlon GmbH (Germany)

European Beauty Products S.L. (Spain)

Européenne de Produits de Beauté S.A.S. (France)

New Revlon Argentina S.A. (Argentina)

Productos Cosmeticos de Revlon, S.A. (Guatemala)

Promethean Insurance Limited (Bermuda)

REMEA 2 B.V. (Netherlands)

Revlon A.B. (Sweden)

Revlon Australia Pty Limited (Australia)

Revlon Beauty Products, S.L. (Spain)

Revlon B.V. (Netherlands)

Revlon Canada Inc. (Canada)

Revlon Chile S.A. (Chile)

Revlon China Holdings Limited (Cayman Islands)

Revlon Europe, Middle East and Africa Ltd. (Bermuda)

Revlon Group Limited (United Kingdom)

Revlon (Hong Kong) Limited (Hong Kong)

Revlon (Israel) Limited (Israel)

Revlon Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan)

Revlon Ltda. (Brazil)

Revlon Manufacturing Ltd. (Bermuda)

Revlon Mauritius Ltd. (Mauritius)

Revlon New Zealand Limited (New Zealand)

Revlon Offshore Limited (Bermuda)

Revlon Overseas Corporation, C.A. (Venezuela)
Revlon Pension Trustee Company (U.K.) Limited (United Kingdom)

Revlon (Puerto Rico) Inc. (Puerto Rico)

Revlon Real Estate Kabushiki Kaisha (Japan)





---





Revlon, S.A. de C.V. (Mexico)

Revlon (Shanghai) Limited (China)

Revlon South Africa (Proprietary) Limited (South Africa)

Revlon S.p.A. (Italy)

Revlon (Suisse) S.A. (Switzerland)

Revlon Taiwan Limited (Taiwan)

S.E.F.A.O., S.A. (Spain)

Shanghai Revstar Cosmetic Marketing Services Limited (China)

YAE Artistic Packings Industry Ltd. (Israel)

YAE Press 2000 (1987) Ltd. (Israel)





---
Exhibit 10.1

July 27, 2009

Joel F.
Gemunder
100 E. RiverCenter Blvd.
Suite 1600
Covington, KY 41011

Re:     
Temporary Salary Reduction Program

Dear Joel:

As
you know, Omnicare is implementing a temporary salary reduction program. During
the period of Omnicares temporary salary reduction program, your regular base
salary will be reduced by five percent (5%) from its current level. This
reduction in your regular base salary will become effective as of July 16,
2009.

The
salary reduction does not constitute a breach of, or a failure by Omnicare or
any of its affiliates to observe or perform any of their obligations under,
your employment agreement with Omnicare, dated August 4, 1988, (the Employment
Agreement) or any other agreement you may have with Omnicare or any of its
affiliates. The salary reduction will have no effect on the validity or
enforceability of any provision of the Employment Agreement or any other
agreement that you may have with Omnicare or any of its affiliates.
Notwithstanding anything in this letter to the contrary, for purposes of
determining (i) the severance payable pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Employment
Agreement, (ii) the amount of compensation under the Excess Pension Benefit
portion of the Excess Benefit Plan and the Excess Savings Benefit portion of
the Excess Benefit Plan and (iii) your benefits under any other employee
benefit plan of Omnicare or any of its affiliates, your base salary shall be
determined without application of the salary reduction set forth above.

Nothing
in this letter constitutes an admission by Omnicare or any of its affiliates
that your consent is required to reduce your regular base salary under the
terms of the Employment Agreement or otherwise. If and to the extent necessary,
however, this letter modifies the Employment Agreement to reflect the foregoing
temporary salary reduction.

---



Please
execute and return this letter to show your acknowledgment of and agreement to
the foregoing. We appreciate your efforts on behalf of Omnicare.

| |                     
| | --------------------
| | Sincerely,          
| |                     
| | /s/
 Mark G. Kobasuk
| |                     
| | Mark G.
 Kobasuk    

|                                | 
|------------------------------- | 
|Agreed and
 accepted:          
|                               
|/s/ Joel F. Gemunder            | 
|                                | 
|Employee                       
|Printed
 Name: Joel F. Gemunder
|Date: July
 27, 2009           

---
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk April 27, 2010

s0419 

# Order

April 27, 2010

139939

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139939 COA: 292007 Wayne CC: 04-012494-FC LEONARD HANSEND, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 24, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06281]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Finance, Budget & Program Committee Meeting of the Board of 
Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act

TIME & DATE:  2:00 p.m., Monday, March 23, 2015.

PLACE:  NeighborWorks America--Gramlich Boardroom, 999 North Capitol 
Street NE., Washington, DC 20002.

STATUS:  Open (with the exception of Executive Session).

CONTACT PERSON:  Jeffrey Bryson, General Counsel/Secretary, (202) 760-
4101; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#9df7ffefe4eef2f3ddf3eab3f2effa"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b8d2dacac1cbd7d6f8d6cf96d7cadf">[email protected]</span></a>.

AGENDA: 
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. Executive Session: Management Update
III. Audio Visual Contract Decision
IV. Training Tool Restart
V. Sustainable Homeownership
VI. FY16 Federal Budget
VII. Management Updates
VIII. Adjournment


Jeffrey T. Bryson,
EVP & General Counsel/Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06281 Filed 3-16-15; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 7570-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
REF ID:A485537 

• 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

- - - - - - - -- - - - --------- -
I} 

! 

REF ID:A485537 

GQ;FIJNTIAl 

obiCE bP' M GiiDI BIGIAL OFPICD 

Brigadier General 01.matead 

oi'iilff ois BRABcH 

___ __.c ... 0_1_ob.;,;;;;,,;;;;.A--..Sa_._d..,.t.-.le.r,_. ----:, ,_,~-; 

s:mm :tftlm:ciGENCE SIRVftE i .~ ·. oolibkICATIOI thxsol DIVISIOlf i \ F " ·' I i 1

1 i j: __ .-L;;.;:;t.:..._.C_o-=l:.o:o;:;;;;a.-.el.._.Jli__..n-.c ... kl-.e.,.r...._ __ :: { '. Lt. Colonel W. T. Guest · ! ~--:;<- ~ 

• i· 

·• 

: A i· A-1 I ~---=-·----- I ! ) I c ! 

I - I i Adm1n1Btra ti ve !. 

!ll&JOJ:' B. G. Hayea~ 

..3 

Japanese 

· or Svenason. 

·~3("" 

PeriOiin.el i · 1Crn>tanal7t!cj Captain J. B. lfathevst lla.Jor H. Dol!d 

8"· 

Organization of SIS as ot , December 1941, compiled rrom 

record8 ot the period concerned. 

Jlade 14 November 1945. 

fCode Compilationj 16114 D1atr1but1onl , Captain Cook f 

2-.,{g 

i La.boi-a tol"J' \ 

!llajor A. J. RcGra11! 

(/.
- ... --

i· • 

3. 

4. 

5. 

6. 

7. 

s. 

9. 

10. 

11. 

~,,n.rl. 

REF ID:A66191 

Unofficial list of R1u WAEis 

~/)A. Adrian Albert. 1 Aug 53 to 30 June 54. Cons • 

.30 worldng days ($50) Request No. 34-219 l500 

Remarks: He is an expert on higher algebra. His services are needed for 

technical consultation necessary to the implementation of' an NSA program. 

PJ. 

~-David H. Blackwell. 28 Oct 53 to 30 June 54. Cons. 

30 working days ($50) Request No. 34-238 1500 

Remarks: He is one of the nation's outstanding authorities in the fields 

of statistics~ probability, and game theory. He will assist on a highly 

specialized, classified research project. 

Dudley A. Buck. l Jul 53 to 30 June 54. 

45 worldng days ($45) Request No. 3011-42 2025 

Remarks: To be consultant on logical design and mgnetic and dielectric 

storage problems. His time will be utilized both in Washington, under 

travel orders, and in Boston, under letter direction as needed. 

,~ 

~I Stewart s. Cairns. 1 Jul 53 to 30 Jun 54. Cons. 

20 working days {$50) Request No. 301P-59 1000 

Remarks: He is an expert on topology. 

Prof. Andrew M. Gleason. 1 Jul 53 to 30 June 54. Exp. 

90 working days ($50) Request No. 34-208 4500 

Remarks: He is an expert on stochastic processes, topology and combinatorial 

analysis. 

Prof. Robert E. Greenwood. l Jul 53 to 30 Jun 54. Exp. 

30 working days ($50) Request No. 34-204 

Remarks: He is an . expert on theoretical statistics. 

Prof. Robert; J. Lambert. ll Sept; 53 to 30 June 54. Ex:p. 

30 working days ($35) Request No. 34-225 

Remarks: He is an expet't on higher algebra. 

Prof. Donald H. Menzel. 1 Jul 53 to 30 Jun 54. 

5 working days ($50) Request. No. 3011-40 

Remarks; He is ·a leading authority on astral physics. 

Marcella Phillips. 1 Jul 53 to 30 Jun 54. 

90 working days ($50) Request No. 3011-53 

Remarks: A leading expert on ionospheric radio propagation, 

as a consultant in conjunction with research and development 

systems in the high frequency radio spectrum. 

Jolm s. Toll. 6 Jul 53 to 30 Jun 54. 

90 working days ($45) Request No. 3011-63 

Remarks: He is an expert on theoretical ph¥sics. 

Samuel B. Williams. 1 Jul 53 to 30 Jun 54. 

1500 

1050 

250 

4500 

she will serve 

of transmission 

4050 

90 working days ($50) Request No. 3011-44 4500 

Remarks: As one or the country's leading authorities on relays and switching systems, he serves as professional engineering consultant to the 0.f'fice 

or R/D in a variety of classified research and development projects. 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 03-25-2014 pursuantto E .0 .~52EJ
Second Amendment to Senior Management Supplemental Deferred Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 
 Second Amendment to 
 CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC. 

SENIOR MANAGEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL DEFERRED SAVINGS PLAN 
 (As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009) 
 1. Section 3.4(b)
is amended by replacing the phrase “or by reason of elective deferrals under this Plan” with the following: 
 “or
by reason of the Pension Plan’s exclusion from the compensation base used in determining accruals (“Pensionable Compensation”) of (x) elective deferrals under this Plan, (y) bonus award amounts under either the Amended and
Restated CME Group Inc. Incentive Plan for Named Executive Officers or the Amended and Restated CME Group Inc. Annual Incentive Plan (the “Bonus Plans”) that would qualify as Pensionable Compensation but for the Participant’s election
to receive such amounts in unrestricted shares of common stock of CME Group Inc. (“Company Stock”) rather than in cash, and (z) amounts includible in the Participant’s gross income under Section 83 of the Code upon the
vesting of restricted shares of Company Stock issued to the Participant as payment of a bonus award under the Bonus Plans.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer on this 25th day of April, 2011. 

 

			
	By:	 	  /s/ Kathleen M. Cronin


 Its: /s/ Managing Director, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary
99-1095.

#### Williams v. Williams.

Warren App. No. CA98-09-114. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Entry Granting Motion to Certify filed May 14,1999, at pages 1 to 2:

“The above cause is before the court pursuant [to] a motion to certify conflict filed by counsel for appellant, Charles Williams, on April 8,1999. Appellant contends that this court’s decision in the above case conflicts with decisions by other appellate courts with respect to how child support is to be calculated when the child receives social security benefits due to the disability of a parent. Appellant therefore contends that our decision is in conflict with decisions by the Seventh District Court of Appeals in *Stephenson v. Stephenson*(Mar. 18, 1996), Mahoning App. No. 94 C.A. 67, unreported [1996 WL 133000], and the Second Appellate District in *McClure v. McClure*(Sept. 27, 1996), Montgomery App. No. 95-CA-86, unreported [1996 WL 562793],

“Upon due consideration of the foregoing, the court finds that there is a conflict between the decision in the subject case and the *Stephenson*and *McClure*cases. Appellant’s motion for certification is hereby GRANTED. The issue for certification shall be as follows: Should a disabled parent’s child support obligation be directly set off by social security payments received on behalf of a minor child, or should the joint child support obligation of both parties be reduced by the amount of the social security payments.”

*Sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 99-934, *infra.*
TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT:

ENERGY EFFICIENCY PROGRAM

FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND 

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT:

RESIDENTIAL CLOTHES DRYERS AND ROOM AIR CONDITIONERS

April 2011

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585
This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc.

and

Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
I v ""' 2'- .JUI/ r;:;;-

REF ID:A4148577 

. eclassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 11-19-2014 

L__ ursuantto E .0. 13526 
\ 

I 

~-- -~"--" ~:!~48577, 111 . ~-·~~·•w • .. .., 1---..._ . ~~ 

. Office Memorandum •. UNITiD s.tATES GOVERNMENT . 

TO : ~J4 0 J~~tA~?':JCJ/Vc,/;_;-/71°(;, DATE: JUN 19 195f 

FROM : A?r-°.Y,,<J /'/ 
-i. 

AS·70 

AS-80 AS•l4 26 Aug 49 

AS-90 

REF ID.:A4148577 

. . . . 

.Wew Hagelin Cipher Machine 

Mr. Rhoads, Ext 215 

l. Attached hereto are two copies of descriptions of the latest Hagelin 

cipher machines entitled "Cipher Devices for Teleprinter Operation" (Chiffriergerate fur Fernschreibbetrieb), translated ·111 this office and fonrarded for information and file. 

2. The following is quoted from a latter dated 27 June 1949 from the U.S. 

Military Atta.cha in Stockholm which accompanied the oriainal document: 

. "Two test machines hav~ iaeen made and teated f.by the Ha~elin Compa?fI.7. 

Following this test, plans were made to construct fifty (50J. additional 

machines incorporating improvements developed as a result of the teat. 

Production has been started and orders are being accepted for these 

machines. Since conl!ftruction is by hand at present, costs are a.pproximato.ly 50i1 higher than those expected when their factory in SWitzerland 

is complete~ tooled and operating on a production basis •. Present quoted 

cost, 8500 Swiss frs.nos per ea.ch machine. 11 

l Incl 

(in duplicate) 

WILLIA» F. ffiIEWAtJ 

Special Assistant to the Chief 

Army Security Agency
REF ID: ASR.§#2 

.., 

Mr • William F. Friedman 

Army Security Agency 

Washington 251 D. c. 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

• 

S February l9Sl 

In 1948 Mr. AJ.bert Cahn of the Institute fer Numerical Analysis, 

National Bureau ot Standards 1 wrote you abOllt the possibility of 'I/JI' 

assisting the Agency in some way. Now, tor the fl.rst time, I am 

able to do so. 

Of the many mathematical projects conducted here, some are of 

direct er indirect interest to the Agency. One of these is the study 

ot language translation by machine - of which you are aware, no doubt. 

Dr. H. D. Huskey, who supervises this work, has authorized rm to send 

you. a pre-publication cow of the first repert an the language translation study. In addition, I have mclosed a copy of our Quarterly 

Report (July - September, 1950). Page 22 of this Rep<rt is devoted 

to the status of the above project, while the second half of page 

14 is concemed nth the generaticn of rand.om digits • .,. -

Since leaving the Agency 1 I have been werking in mathematical 

statistics. .6.t present, I am a pre-doctcral fellow on the research 

staff ot the ~ at the UCU campus. For this reason 1113' attentim 

has been caught by several mathematical art101.es, er projects of 

interest to JOU• I 11Culd be delighted to hear fran you as to whether 

these items are helpful in arq way. 

Sincereq 1 u. I\ , 

~.....O.VF>~~ Harold P. Edmundson 

4SS3i West 18th Street : 

Encl. 

Los Angeles 19, Califer~a 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-10-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

+
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SERGIO ARVIZU-GRANADOS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-73203

Agency No. A097-337-487

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 25, 2010** 

Before: CANBY, THOMAS, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Sergio Arvizu-Granados, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for adjustment of

status and denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

JUN 09 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-73203

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to continue and a

motion to remand, Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir.

2008); Malhi v. INS, 336 F.3d 989, 993 (9th Cir. 2003), and we review de novo

claims of constitutional violations in immigration proceedings, Sandoval-Luna,

526 F.3d at 1247. We deny the petition for review.

 The IJ did not abuse his discretion in denying a continuance on the ground

that Arvizu-Granados did not demonstrate good cause. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.29 (an

IJ may grant a motion for continuance for good cause shown); see also SandovalLuna, 526 F.3d at 1247 (IJ did not abuse discretion in denying a continuance where

alien had no approved visa petition and no relief was immediately available). It

follows that the IJ did not violate due process by denying the continuance. See

Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring error for a petitioner to

prevail on a due process claim).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to remand on the

ground that Arvizu-Grandos did not submit evidence demonstrating prima facie

eligibility for relief. See Ramirez-Alejandre v. Ashcroft, 319 F.3d 365, 382 (9th

Cir. 2003) (“Under BIA procedure, a motion to remand must meet all the

requirements of a motion to reopen and the two are treated the same.”); see also
3 07-73203

Ochoa-Amaya v. Gonzales, 479 F.3d 989, 992 (9th Cir 2007) (it is the petitioner’s

burden to establish prima facie eligibility for the relief sought).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0381

DAWN M. AUGUSTINE,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 v.

JEWELS JEMS, INC., a Montana 

Corporation

d/b/a/ THE CATTLEMEN'S CUT 

SUPPER CLUB,

 Respondent and Appellant.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

This appeal being subject to M.R.App.P. 7, and the parties having failed to jointly 

and timely select a mediator under M.R.App.P., 7(4),(c),

IT IS ORDERED THAT Thomas Anthony Marra, whose name appears next on 

the list of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals 

which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this August 18, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: Dana A. Henkel, Kathryn Elizabeth Delans, Steven T. Potts, Thomas Anthony

Marra

Viy-.-6Am--f

08/18/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0381
.A - -

DISPOSITION FORM 

. ··~1--~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~.,,_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 

I - FILE NO. SUBJECT 

. -

. ,

TO 

S/ASST 

Possible Security Leaks 

FROM DATE 

NSA 76 9 Jtme l.953 

COMMENT NO. 1 

L Walter Winchell, in his broadcast 7 Jtme 1953 from J.830 to J.845 and 2J.OO 

to 2ll5 over WMAL-ABC said: 

"Washington - The most persistent rumor in the Cap:ttal tonight is that Rus 

sia he.a staged another atomic expl.osion." 

2. '!'he on:Ly information on this subject is the recent series started by 6910th 

Security G.r:oup on 28 May (Copy of original enclosed). 

3. Mr. Olin Adams of NSA bas checked with NED and bas veri:f'ied this sol.e TOP 

smRET CANOE source. 

cc: NSA o6B 

eclassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 05-12-2014 

~e=::----~.;._"'t)urs u a ntto E. O. 135 2 6 
REF ID:A66464 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
REF ID:A66464 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Interactive Data Corporation (the Company) for the
year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stuart J. Clark, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |                                                                      
|------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|                         | 
|Dated: February 27, 2009 |  | /s/    STUART J.
CLARK                                               
|                         |  | Stuart J. Clark Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)