alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>


<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                          23,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,257,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,787,000
<PP&E>                                       2,947,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,986,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,037,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       238,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     515,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,986,000
<SALES>                                     14,992,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,992,000
<CGS>                                       10,503,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,146,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             237,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (894,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (894,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (894,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14404]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06274]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Cancellation of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, April 2, 2015, 1:00 p.m. to 
April 2, 2015, 2:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on March 6, 2015, 80 FR 12185.
    The meeting has been cancelled due to the reassignment of 
applications.

    Dated: March 13, 2015.
Anna Snouffer,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-06274 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Attachment 1

Seminole Dry Conveyor Bottom Ash Handling System Summary Descr iption and DiagramTHE BOTTOM ASH SYSTEM DESIGN:

The primary ash removal conveyor is mounted beneat h the boiler, fully sealed to the combustion chamber. The negative pressure inside the boiler draws in air in a controlled manner through the primary conveyor. The incoming am bient air travels along the convey or, counter to the ash flow direction, over the surface of the ash contained on t he conveyor pans. This causes a re-burning process of the glowing ash, which reduces the unburned carbon level and frees up additional thermal energy. Therefore, the air is pr eheated before it enters the combustion chamber of the boiler.

THE ARRANGEMENT

Underneath the combustion chamber of the boiler, a hopper is insta lled and supported from the floor by means of a steel structure. The transition c hute or hopper is lined with special refractory and

insulation on the inside to withstand the radiation from the combustion chambe r of the boiler. A heat resistant fabric compensator (expansion joint) is installed between the bo iler/hopper outlet and the primary conveyor inlet, to compensate for the movement between the cold and hot conditions of the boiler. Large slag agglomerations ar e broken down by jaw crushers in order to ensure they are an appropriate size to be cooled and conveyed. These jaw crushers are hydraulic operated. In the full closed position, they will provide isolation of the primary conv eyor from the boiler hopper.

THE REST OF THE SYSTEM

In addition to collecting the bottom ash in a dry condi tion, Seminole also collects its economizer ash in a dry condition. The ash is collected from the bo iler economizer area in 6 h oppers that discharge to a series of drag chain conveyors that transport the ash ont o the primary conveyor where it is added to

the bottom ash.

Once the bottom ash and economizer ash are removed from the boi ler by the primary conveyor, it is transported up to the transfer tower where the ash then passes though a double roll grinder to reduce the particle size to below 3 inches. The crushed ash will fall onto a secondary transfer conveyor that is very similar in design to primary conveyor

. The ash will travel up the se condary conveyor where it passes through another set of single roll crushers where it is reduced to 3⁄4 inches in size and is then discharged into the storage silo. The ash is stored in a dry condition. Seminole has the capability of offloading the ash in either a dry or a wet co ndition. The Pug mill wet unloading system adds sufficient quantities of water to condition the as h to prevent dusting in open top trucks. The dry unloading system utilizes a retract able loading spout that is attached directly to specialized trucks designed to receive dry material.Seminole Dry Conveyor Bottom Ash Handling Syste m Summary Diagram Removed

- CBI
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 15, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-60517 Summary Calendar

ABDAL WAHAB RAJEB TUQAN, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A95 537 536

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Abdal Wahab Rajeb Tuqan (Tuqan), a native and citizen of Jordan, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. The BIA accepted the IJ’s determination, in light of the discrepancies between Tuqan’s first and second applications, as well as his testimony at the immigration hearing, that Tuqan’s testimony was not credible.No. 04-60517 -2- The BIA also found that Tuqan had failed to meet his burden of proof to present a believable and sufficiently supported claim. Tuqan argues that the BIA and the IJ erred in determining that certain statements were inconsistent, and he blames any inconsistencies on translation errors or bad advice that he was given by a translator who allegedly assisted him in preparing his first application for asylum and withholding of removal. He also asserts that his supporting documentation did not undermine his testimony. We review the BIA’s determination that an alien is not entitled to asylum or withholding of removal for substantial evidence and will not reverse the BIA’s determination unless the evidence compels a contrary conclusion. See Efe v. Ashcroft , 293 F.3d 899, 905 (5th Cir. 2002). Additionally, we will not substitute our “judgment for that of the BIA or IJ with respect to the credibility of the witnesses or ultimate factual findings based on credibility determinations.” Chun v. INS , 40 F.3d 76, 78 (5th Cir. 1994). There is substantial evidence in the record to support the determination that Tuqan did not credibly or sufficiently support his applications for asylum and withholding of removal. Id. at 79; see also In re Y-B , 21 I & N Dec. 1136, 1139 (BIA 1998). The petition for review is DENIED.
Exhibit 12.1

Guitar Center, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Dollars in thousands)
(unaudited)

|                                                  |                       | Year Ended December 31,
|------------------------------------------------- | --------------------- | -----------------------
|
|Income before income taxes and extraordinary loss |                       | $                      
|                                                  | Add: Interest expense |                        
|                                                  |                       |                        
|                                                  |                       |                        
|                                                  |                       |                        
|Fixed charges:                                    |                       |                        
|                                                  |                       |                        
|                                                  |                       |                        
|                                                  |                       |                        
|                                                  |                       |                        
|Ratio of earnings fixed charges                   |                       |                        
|                                                  |                       |                        

---

---

QuickLinks
Letter Agreement, dated August 3, 2011, between Shaun D. Lynn



 Exhibit 10.3 
 BY HAND 
 August 3, 2011 
 Mr. Shaun D. Lynn 
 Dear Shaun: 

I write on behalf of BGC Brokers L.P. (the “Employer”) in connection with your contract of employment (including any terms and conditions
attached thereto), dated March 31, 2008 and as further amended thereafter (the “Contract”). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein or incorporated by reference shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Contract.

 For good and valuable consideration, the undersigned parties herby agree to amend the Contract as set forth below, effective August 3,
2011. 
 Section 6 (e) shall be amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: 

(e) In each case, unless otherwise provided in the applicable award agreement, all of your stock options, restricted stock units, and
other awards based on shares of BGC Partners, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock shall vest in full and become immediately exercisable, and all partnership units in BGC Holdings, L.P., including founding partner units, REUs, PSUs, PSIs and any
other units you may hold, shall, if applicable, vest in full and be granted immediately exchangeable exchange rights for shares of BGC Partners, Inc.’s Class A Common Stock (including any such awards or units issued to you in connection
with or related to a Change of Control). You will also receive welfare benefit continuation for two years and a pro rata bonus for the year of termination. 
 The undersigned agrees that the undersigned has not relied on any oral or written statements by any person in connection with this letter amendment. This letter amendment supersedes all other
representations and descriptions, oral or written, and all other communications between the parties relating to the subject matter of this letter amendment. Other than as stated herein, all other terms and conditions of your employment remain as set
out in the Contract and any amendments thereto (including but not limited to this letter amendment). 







 This letter amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original,
but all of which shall constitute one agreement. Each such counterpart signature may be delivered via telecopier or email. 
 Yours sincerely,

 /s/ Howard W. Lutnick 
 Howard W.
Lutnick 
 For and on behalf of BGC Partners, Inc. and BGC Brokers L.P. 

 

					
	I agree to the terms set out above:
			
	 /s/    Shaun D.
Lynn        
	 		 	 August 3, 2011

	Shaun D. Lynn	 		 	    Date


 [Signature page to Amendment to Shawn Lynn Employment Agreement dated August 3, 2011]
SERVED : OCTOBE R20 , 201 0 

### jFi^.RTMENTO F TiANSPORWlO N U.S . DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N: jKcT OPERATION S OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C 70: 0 OC T ? I A 9

= 3 0 INTH EMATTE RO F BRENDA NAIRWAYS , LL C FA A DOCKE T NO . CP10EA000 9 (Civi l Penalt y Action ) FDM S NO . FAA-2010-078 8 ORDE RO FCHIE FADMINISTRATIV ELA WJUDG E DISMISSIN GPROCEEDIN GWIT H PREJUDIC E B y "Agency' s Withdrawa l o f Complaint, " serve dOctobe r 7 , 2010 , Complainan t

state s that i t "withdraw s [its ] Complain t i n th e above-captione dmatter. " Accordingly , pursuan t t o 1 4 C.F.R . § 13.215 , thi s proceedin g i s dismisse dwit hprejudice . Th e FA A shal l sen dth e Judg e an dth e Docke t acop y o f

an y compromis e orde r

o r final orde r assessin g civi l penalty . S O ORDERED .

tohhi e A . Yode r Chie f Admin i strati v e Attachment : Servic e Lis t

fci.FA A Docke t No . CP10EA000 9 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC--43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Jaso nDickstein , Respondent' s Counse l Washingto nAviatio n Group , PC , an dth e Law Office s o f Jaso nA . Dickstei n 223 3 Wisconsi n Avenue , N.W. , Ste . 50 3 Washington , D C 2000 7 TEL : 202-628-677 6 FAX : 202-628-894 8 Jeanin e C . Gotimer , Complainant' s Counse l Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , EAL- 7 EasternRegio n Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviatio nPlaz a Jamaica , N Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-326 7 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorabl e Ronnie A . Yoder , Chie f Administrativ e La w Judg e U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Hearings , M-20 , Roo mE l 2-32 0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-214 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . Fo r servic e i nperso no r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federa l Aviatio nAdministration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430 .

- 2 -
## Sovereign Air, Inc.

January 22, 2010

Sovereign Air, Inc.

Jon Payne, CFO

48 Champions Run

San Antonio, TX 78258

Ph (210) 481

‐ 2617

Fx (210) 481

‐ 7611

Cell (210) 601

‐ 6092

Sovereign Air, Inc. is now planning to perform any required proving runs for scheduled service between

Salina, KS (SLN) and Kansas City, MO (MCI). Any required proving runs will be performed with a King Air

200 or King air 350.

Sovereign Air plans to have everything ready for commuter operations beginning April 1, 2010, with the

initial minimal schedule that follows:



### 4 Round Trips Per Day

Flt# SLN Departure MCI Arrival Flt# MCI Departure SLN Arrival

TBD 06:00 06:40 TBD 07:00 07:40

TBD 12:00 12:40 TBD 13:00 13:40

TBD 14:00 14:40 TBD 15:00 15:40

TBD 17:00 17:40 TBD 20:00 20:40

We calculate that the additional financial strength required by the Fitness Division for the first three

months of commuter operation will be approximately $210,000 based on this operation schedule. More

information regarding this and other updates will follow shortly.

Sincerely,

_________________

Jon Payne, CFO

Sovereign Air, Inc.
3 

4 

MEMO ROUTING SLIP 

'

'•NEVER USE FOR APPROV.1LS, DISAPPROVALS, 

'CONCURRENCES, OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

ORGAlllZATION 

INITIALS CIRCULATE 

DATE COORDINATION • 

FIL:;: 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

TELEPHON5 

pursuant to E.O. 
.. 

•
REF ID:A43225 

~C. 9C. $, II~""~ a.,.e:J A~v FiJre, 'S',# '"' r: 

\I 0 ' /!iZLlZ . . (.llJo 1tt • W,4 71 lf'l,,/•rA 'f ~ p U ,f ,~,,/~ W /.,' tf,,'t"y0 Y _Hof ~ ·~~ 110/u&.Wri'S h,ar1~ ~I/~,,,, blf'.t'..., 

o/)~ lo/1 SI({) J 

(;:, e.. 1t'. s Ni11tt/AI s,,,,,,r: 

l/o/$ I _,,,,,.,..o'4~ l.:z:y I 

t;;. e. "t'. s. ~- ,,.. t ~"'' ,. !:. i'. M 7 .. I 

VtJls I - Iv 

t;l.t:.'IC. S. i:,,,1,""«,,.+14 a.,,,f ':f"""'~ll'uAI '5',~,r1T: 

V11l 1 r 9' .iz: 

4.t!. t!/t!.~. FJ,.,. 11 111 -' M./,f,1u'j H1sfoY-:J lww.ir) 

V:fJls·· Z -!ID.. 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-26-2014 pursuant to 

.0. 13526 
.... -~ 

~-;: i-~~ .. 

/ 

REF ID:A43225 

ffp·aeeRET "ULTRA" 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL .86-36/50 USC 3605 

G.C. &: c.s, !lllf !NII AIR J'o.a:3 SIGilft 

( Vols. 1-III 

{ " IV-VI 

II VII-VIII 

IX 

If x. 

" XI 

l.f XII 

" XIII 

" XIV 

" xv 

It XVI. 

" XVII 

/ " XVIII 

It XIX 

. . Orga.JJ.isation and Evelution or ~itiah J.riq Sig.int. 

Organisation and h'ol1'.tion of British Air Foree 

Sigint 

Kiseellaneous Cryptographic Systems and !Jleir 

Solution ' . 

.. 

'tb.e US1e or Sigmt .. · 

Contents, General Index and Sources 

Vols. I - T.r in process ot 1!'25!!ct:!f! 

., 

I ' 
Cu;y 3 & ID Volumes I-II 

Volume III 

y· tt IV 

v "' T 

/, " VI 

}' " VII 

v fl VIII 

"' " IX 

v n x 

.,-' "' XI 

" XII 

y-· " XIII 

v " xv 

G.C. & c.s. 

v Vol\lllle I 

" II 

N 

III 

IV 

REF ID:A43225 ... :';,. -~· . ~ ...... --· 

"FOP 8E0RET. "YLTRA" 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/SO Use 36d5 

Organisa.ti~ and bolution of British Naval S~gint, 

Pa.rt 1, ~ llakiag of Siaint" 

. . OrgaJlisatiGD and J:volution of British Naval Sig:i.nt, 

Part 2, The Fland.ling of Sig:tnt 

Organisation and. .Evolution ·of British Nav&;l Sigiat, 

Pa.r.t 3, Tbe Use of Sig:int \ . 

Or isa tion and Evolution of Bri tisb. lfa:n.l Si int 

The Processing of DecrJIPts 

General Intelligence 

Teehiiical. Intelligence and the Processing of 

Captured,Docunents 

Y/T Int~lligence 

. 1· 

\ 

I 

I Contents, Sources and General Index. ) 

,/ 

sJIJRl'f SDVICI SIGDl'l . . , . \ 

.. ~. 

• 

llr_is .. - and !Wol,.-t;:i.Qn or )<'i.tish Secret'-... ~t: I 

Cry,ptogralidc Systems and !heir Solu.tion • VachlJ;te ~[>.P 

Cryptographic Systems and Their Solution - ~d 

&.a.ex and Glossary to Cryptographic Systems and 

!heir Solution 

' . 

• 

~ '<~'1-liJ G~c .. ~ o.s. DIPL'8.A.TIO JD Crnoo:FiCUL SIGllJf - Vols .. I and II 

• I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE SRI RECEIVABLES PURCHASE CO., INC.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>   
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          80,726
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            86,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        630
<BONDS>                                   30,000
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                40,312
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              86,483
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           9,003
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,234
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         3,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            4,029
<INCOME-TAX>                               1,483
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        2,546
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              642
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                               1,904
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
99-1240.

#### Ameritech Ohio v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 97-1557-TP-CSS. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of the joint motion for a stay of all further proceedings in this court pending final disposition of case No. C2-99-552 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, and request for expedited ruling,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for stay be, and hereby is, granted.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

  By:   /s/  Robert Wolfe

Robert Wolfe 

Chief Executive Officer 

Date: March 4, 2011 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31, 2010 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

By: /s/ Robert Wolfe

Robert Wolfe

Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 4, 2011
117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2184 

AN ACT 

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to institute a 

trading prohibition for certain issuers that retain public 

accounting firms that have not been subject to inspection 

by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 2184 ES

1 SECTION 1. TRADING PROHIBITION FOR 2 CONSECUTIVE 

2 NON-INSPECTION YEARS. 

3 Section 104(i) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 

4 U.S.C. 7214(i)) is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking ‘‘the 

6 foreign jurisdiction described in clause (i)’’ and in7 serting ‘‘a foreign jurisdiction’’; and 

8 (2) in paragraph (3)— 

9 (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking 

10 ‘‘3’’ and inserting ‘‘2’’; and 

11 (B) in subparagraph (A), in the matter 

12 preceding clause (i), by striking ‘‘3’’ and insert13 ing ‘‘2’’. 

Passed the Senate June 22, 2021. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2184 

AN ACT 

To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to instiposes. counting Oversight Board, and for other pur- subject to inspection by the Public Company Ac- retain public accounting firms that have not been tute a trading prohibition for certain issuers that