alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         184,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,758,194
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    472,593
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,611,518
<PP&E>                                      18,470,493
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,213,808
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              21,899,658
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,699,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,184,913
<OTHER-SE>                                   8,316,204
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                21,899,658
<SALES>                                      5,105,334
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,105,334
<CGS>                                        4,970,706
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,622,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             481,424
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,969,410)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,969,410)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



                           Section 1350 Certifications
     Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
     with Respect to the North Valley Bancorp Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                       for the Quarter ended June 30, 2003



         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of North Valley Bancorp, a California corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

         1.       The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
                  ended June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
                  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.       Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
                  material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.





Dated: August 12, 2003                 /s/ MICHAEL J. CUSHMAN
                                       ----------------------
                                       Michael J. Cushman
                                       President and Chief
                                       Executive Officer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)



Dated: August 12, 2003                 /s/ EDWARD J. CZAJKA
                                       --------------------
                                       Edward J. Czajka
                                       Executive Vice President
                                       and Chief Financial Officer
                                       (Principal Financial Officer)


         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to North Valley Bancorp and will be retained by North Valley
Bancorp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.


                                       27
SPSLG 0?2 Legal Patents 

REF ID:A363156 

ARMY SERVICE FORCES 

OP'FICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 215, D. C. 

SPSI.D-Ja 

11 August 1944 

Hon. Commissioner of Patents 

Dear Sir: 

It is requested that the inclosed patent 

application on LLEGTRI•AL SYSTEll 

by \:iJ.lian l;.. Fri edt'.lan 

be handled by the Patent Office in such manner that 

the application is hand C&TI"ied to Richmond and is there 

kept in a safe provided for such papers. 

1 Incl 

Patent Application 

Yours very trul.y, 

'' »1 W.llf}~J''• l.run ..... I{ a 11 

Principal H.adio I:n~~:.neer 

Patents & Inventions 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E,O, 1352a
JN MPLY lllPMTO 

REF ID :A522089'ft 

WAR DEPARi'M~ 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

Se~tember 12, 1933 

.Mr. George A. Graham, 

Signal Corps Labor~tories, 

Fort i:iionmouth, New Jersey. 

Dear Graham: 

I em forwarding the encloseci at the: request of t.lr. 

Rowe. 

You will note that L have signed on the dotted line. 

I did this not because I wanted to, but because we won't lose 

anything if we do and will lose everything if we don't, for 

the thing must be filed before September 24th or else the whole 

patent uill automatically become abandoned. 

Now if we sign, Rowe seys that lie can at any time 

cancel the deferment of issue, even before the year is up. And 

I propose to take this up with rrr:y people here right soon and 

get some more satisfactor;y action. I was not given a chance 

to express my views on the matter before this course was ado,tltea., 

see no good reason for it, em op?Osed to the preeedent, and in 

general, think it not a fair deal.· Mr. Rowe seems to agree with 

me and he seys he is just following out orders given him. 

It would be a shame to lose fifty fine claims for no 

good reason, after ail the hard work we and Rowe did on this case. 

Please return the signed document at once to either me 

or ~lr. ·Rowe, as there is no time to lose. 

Sincerely yours, 

j f'a,t,._. •"'--" 

.. Encl. 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
REF ID:A56947 

~ .,._ .... 

111'11&1 Gll:llA'll 

DUI cammD'llCll ... 

llU 

~ , 

........ I ......., 

M:llClll 

, mnam 

-

• -·· 

_,.. 

\ 

~DA .1.GO:W..•1.1.lilpr .. md.l.l'BQ 11 - I - :rllliml\............ .. I 

- .... - -------..... -- -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-21-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
~ -- . • 

2 

NEYER. USE FOR Al'l'R.OVAl.S, DISAPPR.OVALS. 

CONCUR.BENCF.S. OR. Slllll.All ACTIONS 

INITIALS 

DATE 

CIRCULATE 

COORDINATION 

FILI 

INFORMATIQll 

NCm: AND 

RETURN 

SEE ME 

S811ATURE 

DD FORll 9 5 Bepl8aal DA AGO J'arm a, 1Apr48, lll1d AJ'B.Q I f£8 DO l'uCm U. JO Nov f.r, wldah DllQ' lie 1lllid. 
d ...... .......... 

MS'!RICIBD 

DF 304 

REF ID:A56947 

COPY 

6/53/Rl!BBW'l!D/EA-J.8 

The Japanese Version of the Black. Chamber 

(The Story ot the Jf&val Secret Cba,mber) 

bJ YOKOI, Tosh:lyuki 

'!'be attached article was originally intended tor nagazine publication 

and vaa submitted to American officials bJ the author. Subsequently he 

expanded his script am published it in book. form. The origiD&l version ,.. ...,.. n ............... .-,... ----. •www a 

is reproduced here as received, in the belief that it Diil' prove ot 

interest. Whether the book will be translated is not as yet known. 

March 1953 

Distribution: norm.l 

50 copies 

47 pages 

Cr? ~ ,r!J f ltf!.':t t . 

J~ ;(, ./,.μ ~ 

f\/I 

--.......
ALEX G. URGLEWICH, 

Appellant, 

v. 

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL 

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA 

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

CASE NO. 1D16-1612 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

_____________________________/ 

Opinion filed November 23, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Suwannee County. 

David W. Fina, Judge. 

Alex G. Urglewich, pro se, Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Virginia Harris, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. 

 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

WOLF, RAY, and MAKAR, JJ., CONCUR.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,928-01

EX PARTE KAITLYN LUCRETIA RITCHERSON, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-11-302663-A IN THE 331ST DISTRICT COURT

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to twenty-five years’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals affirmed her conviction. 

Ritcherson v. State, 476 S.W.3d 111 (Tex. App. — Austin, Aug. 31, 2015). 

In this application, filed on her behalf by appellate counsel, Applicant contends that she was

denied her right to petition this Court for discretionary review because of appellate counsel’s

deficient performance. Appellate counsel advised Applicant that he would file a petition for
2

discretionary review on her behalf. After requesting and obtaining an extension of time from this

Court, appellate counsel erroneouslymiscalculated the new due date for the petition for discretionary

review. As a result of this miscalculation, appellate counsel failed to timely file the petition for

discretionary review or request another extension of time from this Court.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law finding that appellate counsel failed to timely file

Applicant’s petition for discretionary review after advising her that he would file a petition on her

behalf. The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1997).

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Third Court of Appeals in Cause No. 03-13-00804-

CR that affirmed her conviction in Cause No. D-1-DC-11-302663 from the 331st District Court of

Travis County. Applicant shall file her petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30

days of the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: November 16, 2016

Do not publish
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00429-CR

Michael Nnamani

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

§

From County Criminal Court No. 6

of Tarrant County (1342673)

November 17, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

Dissent by Justice Dauphinot

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth________________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
**EXHIBIT 32.8**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Iomega Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 1, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Preston Romm, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

/s/ Preston Romm

Preston Romm

Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

November 9, 2006

 

This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Iomega Corporation specifically incorporates it by reference.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 22, 2016

No. 04-16-00609-CV

Jason Jeremy MATTHEWS,

Appellant

v.

Layna Marie MATTHEWS,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-CI-00535

Honorable Stephani A. Walsh, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The appellant’s two “Motions for Immediate Relief” and the “Motion for Request for 

Documentation” are DENIED, without prejudice to raising the issues in appellant’s brief.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 !
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 "
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 #
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 %
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 &
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 '
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 (
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 )
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 !
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 "
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 #
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 %
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 &
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 '
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 (
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! )
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! 
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! !
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! "
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! #
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! $
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! %
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! &
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! '
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 ! (
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " )
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " 
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " !
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " "
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " #
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " $
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " %
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " &
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " '
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 " (
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # )
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # 
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # !
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # "
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # #
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # $
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # %
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # &
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # '
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 # (
 ! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $ )
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $

2 / + )'(/ 2 / 7 1 7 8 7 9 : / ( 8
! " # % &' ()* + , - . /0 1/ 2 3 / ( 4 - 5 6 $ !

; /&<= >/ ? @ % A B ? C ? @ A D E F C ? B F G C A H A C C I D ? @ %

C I F I @ @ ? C E E J K @ I F E F J @ % L M 6 L I C N . A B K ? @ ? @ .

@ A D E F % G I O G . . E G I N % @ I I P J E . A E Q Q ? . A @ H E F ? O I
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14239 and #14240]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 03/11/2015. *Incident:*
                         Round Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         02/06/2015 through 02/12/2015. *Dates:*
                         Effective Date: 03/11/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         05/11/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/11/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Mono. *Contiguous Counties:* California: Alpine, Fresno, Inyo, Madera, Tuolumne. Nevada: Douglas, Esmeralda, Lyon, Mineral. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625( print page 14430)Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14239 5 and for economic injury is 14240 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California, Nevada. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: March 11, 2015. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-06330 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
r·· .. - {"•· 

0- .r 

·-I 

- - - - - . - ~nw,.:~67250 ~ 

~CIJnCt 

' 

Ml1tl.'MNJ>W tor 1'11.t 

Oil 19 •rt11 1'4.S a oonfe.-.no. •• uld at. llpal leour1•1 .1.&••1 

a\ wh1oh th•r• ••N prti••nt Colonel Cordenau alld Mr. J'rietlan npre- .-tlq the A1'111, Coma&JJ4•r Bid.th and Coaand•rWffk1 np,....m.ina ih• ,...,,, and ~der PU'k and v.Jor Moat npreeent.inc thli lt&t• 

n.pariltent. !tie purpo1e ot the ocmt1rence •• to dnenrolne what 

oryptographlo pl.aA b•n 1t.d:\M. th• need• ot the Stat• nepar&sent a\ 

'\ti• pr•••n~ time tU!ng b.l'\o oonaU.rat:loa 1uoh •t~en •• t~ urpn.•1 

ot tb• N(lt.d.Nr .. nt and. the a1'&11a'b11tt7 of 9fiulJS9llt• 

. ---- --- -

· C~.4•r Park ~ueded the eanourreno• ot tb• Anq aad .Navr rtp~•••ntativ•• la hl• ~ro10 .. 1 to proour1 a4cU.tioDlll CSP 1200'• 

hom the •'1 wtdah would, la 0011JU11dio11 with the NaY)' •ehlne• 

th• •••'L• Pttpark.en\ now Jw.11 proY14• a n.plcl and •••ur• mean• of 

t17g\opaphlo oODaantoa\1on, Ht propoaed al.•o 1.hai 'th• Mate J)epart• 

l'"A11t. r.-k.tn lt.• llOJ'O'f'a, and wh-. SIOW& beocime• aftllaltle, obtain 

I w 10 ot th• to tao111~at• IOZ!lr:Utd.cat1oai with bol4tne ot IIOlvT. 

lJI Yi" of 'lh• tui that '\he .Ma.•1 1• la a po1l'\i0zt. to ake t.be 

neo••IU'1 aUtnbtfr or osP 1200•. avallabl• 'f•l'J ahonl7, 1"-rllaa 

QU ~ eey w1 t.htn t.he ntai t-.o n:!:l:er•&• t.he Arw;r will llft lMa 

&\le ~o ~lh llGLll& tor &pp iely ala ... th•, and •iae• 

tht fh1it 1'1,par\mtn~ 1• U. jaed.1-t.• •••cl,ot a l'aJlld ud •••ure 

uani ot trn~op-aphio aommunlcation, s.t ••acned tm:t •h• lkt• 

IMJ*.riaaeni thoyU ;prooeecl wiJb '\bl plan propoMcl '-7 c .. u.r Park. 

n ..... funh•r qncd that at th• u:p1ra\1on ot th•..,., 0 .... 

1oon. ih•r•Aft.tr u oQllil\lon• war ram, r• ... urY•.Y u aomuo1.9" to 

Mlnb• whil~ 11.&n would at t.t.t ·Um• lien ..n th• ated.11 ot tta. h~~, Marina iii mind t.he avallabll1t1 ot •Clulpmen\ 1 '\n adYUe•• 

'b oqptolopo \•obniqut and. \he IU"l•nt. 11eed. for HMarlt7 of it.• •-- .W.~'1tM1. . .... . . 

. ,;; -__ -

... -.. ,. ' 

1 

' ~' 

I~ 

-

.. SECRET Declassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 04-07-2014 

bursuantto E .0. 13526
REF ID:A65440 

-'• .. - .. ·-,.. ...... r=--.. .. --,..-- ' .... ,.,,,;i-.. 1· '1[ I 1 I 

MAGIC--FAR EAST SUMMAR·---------·---1 ....-1--

No. 214 

20 Oct 1944 • "' -- - , 

3 •. Japanese Intelllgence--Reading of Chinese Messages: 

~· It appears from recently ava1lable messages that the 

Japanese have been reading encoded radio communications about 

Allied operations on the N Burma and Salween fronts. The'evidence 

indicates that the messages were originated by Chinese communications 

centers and sent in Chinese codes, and that the Japanese were 

reading such messages currently at least during May, June and July. Whether they have continued to do so since July cannot yet be 

determined. Some of the Japanese decoding apparently was done in 

forward areaaf in one case at a Japanese divisional HQ (56th Div on 

Salween frontJ. 

b. The intelligence obtained by the Japanese from this source 

has inCluded current information on Chinese units movements and 

positions, shifts of HQs, casualties, replacements and in some 

instances plans for attack. In addition, movements of British 

units operating with the Chinese on the N Burma front have been dist 

closed to the Japanese. 

£• Although two or tne messages read by the Japanese purport- edly were "from Stilwell to Chiang Kai-shek", HQ CBI advises that 

these two messages were not originated by any U. s. HQ • . !!· The entire subject has been taken up with the theater 

author1t1es who have bean making an investigatipn to determin~ 

proper corrective action. 

4. Japanese Intelligence--Interception of U. S~ Messages. 

At 11531 on 18 Oct Guard.iv #15 (Navy) at Hoihow, Hainan Is, 

sent a message to several Japanese Navy commands which appears to 

report an interception or a 14th Air Force mes~age from Nanning to ~ 

Liuchow, giving the position or Japanese sh1.ps in the S China Sea. 

The message stated that the follpwing message had been sent from 

Banning to Liuchow at 1100 (presumably the same day): 

· "At 1020) tran~ort convo1 comiaosed of five ships in_ 

position 20-20 N, f.!igure not clea!:f-17E. At 1050, a transport in position 19-50 N, 111-17 E, heading N". (N29577) 

Note: The position of the transport reported in the message is approximately 300 m. SE of Nanning and thus within recce range or 

U.S. planes. A number or messages o~ig1nating at Ho1how have reported 

movements or Allied planes in S China, but appear to have been based 

on traffic analysis and on ipterception of Allied airground communicaU.ons. 

.-- --:"\ 

' 1 11 I I I I 

, ,_, "j- I I •1 ' I I r· '\' \ ,,r~ Ll 11 r -J 11'- '.....• "• ! 111 I - .. \,.- ._,,._ '&!J .~ .... """".! 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

\