alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 229 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to permit the Federal Deposit 

Insurance Corporation to terminate the insured status of a depository 

institution that refuses to provide services to certain Federal contractors, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 4, 2021 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. CRAMER, Mr. COTTON, and 

Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to permit the 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to terminate the 

insured status of a depository institution that refuses 

to provide services to certain Federal contractors, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Financial Defense for 

5 Industrial Contractors Act’’ or the ‘‘FDIC Act’’. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 229 IS

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF INSURANCE. 

2 Section 8 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 

3 U.S.C. 1818) is amended— 

4 (1) in subsection (a)(3), by inserting ‘‘or (x)’’ 

5 after ‘‘subsection (w)’’; and 

6 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘(x) TERMINATION OF INSURANCE RELATING TO

8 DENIAL OF SERVICES TO FEDERAL CONTRACTORS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection— 

10 ‘‘(A) the term ‘contractor’ means an entity 

11 that— 

12 ‘‘(i) is a party to a contract with the 

13 Federal Government; 

14 ‘‘(ii) has complied with all applicable 

15 laws and regulations in fulfilling the re16 sponsibilities of the entity with respect to 

17 the contract described in clause (i); and 

18 ‘‘(iii) satisfies traditional underwriting 

19 and credit standards with respect to the 

20 banking service sought by the entity under 

21 paragraph (2); and 

22 ‘‘(B) the term ‘covered institution’ means 

23 an insured depository institution that has more 

24 than $50,000,000,000 in total consolidated as25 sets. 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 229 IS

1 ‘‘(2) NOTICE OF TERMINATION; 

2 PRETERMINATION HEARING.—If a covered institu3 tion refuses to provide a banking service sought by 

4 a contractor, the Board of Directors shall— 

5 ‘‘(A) issue to the insured depository insti6 tution a notice of its intention to terminate the 

7 insured status of the insured depository institu8 tion; and 

9 ‘‘(B) schedule a hearing on the matter, 

10 which shall be conducted in all respects as a 

11 termination hearing pursuant to paragraphs (3) 

12 through (5) of subsection (a). 

13 ‘‘(3) TEMPORARY INSURANCE OF PREVIOUSLY

14 INSURED DEPOSITS.—Upon termination of the in15 sured status of any depository institution pursuant 

16 to paragraph (2), the deposits of such depository in17 stitution shall be treated in accordance with sub18 section (a)(7).’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
. . •• REF ·rn·:A67002 

....., ... .. . '. 

"~"'.Jll ~ : '" _: 0 I , 

- . 

PG .Rcpor,t 

. . ,_ /1 I , '.,,~. - ! ~J .\..~ .. -· ...,...!.>. ~ 

• .,:t'· . . ~(.'·•'. ~ 

. Ke••r• .Raven 

Campaip 

_: ·.· c/s: · · · 

Shaw · - "•4 •• 

Sh1nn 

l •. I have receut'.cy 'becolle aware at an 0111aa1on vhich I regret. very :much and 

tar which I otter 'S1 personal. ap>logy. · I :r:eter to the tact that you were not 

intor..a. aa ~ the f'iual action on )'Our ti~e r~rt on the use of the Po]¥griaph. 

· 2. For )'Our intormat:lon, the J>1rector.'e.dec1a1on on ;vour recoa.n4at1ona. 

vaa u toll.owaa · 

"As to long-ranae.planning-~we will'PG·al.l employees and.r.e-PG all 

employees period1call.1' but we are not in a position to: start. now. 

I concur With other ·recomendations insofar a.a we can put them into 

ef':tect.· I do not concur 'Vith tr;ying to be over-spec1t1c in 

clearauce criteria.". 

3. roll.owing' tllese dec11111ona, a conference was held with the Director wherein 

1 t wu f'urlher decided to attempt exper:!meiital JIG testing with a view tOwar4 

obt&1ning definitive fl.at& and experience and toward reducing the ant1•JO aentiae~t : 

. if' JO••ible. 1'hese were to be the stepping stones leading to a fuller implementation 

ot 10ur recomend.at1ons. · · 

Z... Perhlps additional rf!aista.Dce tromuuexpected sources or perhaps due to - premature expa.as1on, consid...""l"able confus1o~ and ill-feeling W:>ward this program 

. has arisen. I am aUl"e the need f'or •ecur1t7 c~ntrol ia •hared by all in our 

b11111Desa., and I am sure· that the concept ot continued ••curity checking ot personnel 

1• also aecepted •. I am. not sure that an .adequate irosraa to meet these require- · . menta CAil be established "Without the Wle Of the pC>~&l"qh eventually. 

5. At present, the program initiated or1staal4'" in Dr. lhav'a •hop and 1awr 

in Dr. Shinn'a.shop baa been auspeaded. I have recoaa.en4ed a t'Gr*l ee...-.u.-.n 

ot tile "Select Comittee" to the Director ¥1th a v1ev toward getttq the progrm 

ap:ln under vay on a 'S>re formal. and adequate~ .controlled bui•. 

CCJ 

·.· ~ ' ' ' I 

"· 

Mr. Frie~ //_.. .: 

· Chief', Secur1t7 Con~l 

'• .. . ·. 

· .. 

, .. 

AURBD R. llA1llY 

Colonel, UB Arafy Chief'.~ Staff 

D~classifi ed and approved for release by NSA on 10~·25-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,354,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               14,002,694
<ALLOWANCES>                                   230,707
<INVENTORY>                                 13,059,689
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            29,578,069
<PP&E>                                      21,488,872
<DEPRECIATION>                              11,922,885
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              45,445,885
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,529,873
<BONDS>                                      5,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,857
<OTHER-SE>                                  20,891,155
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                45,445,885
<SALES>                                     42,509,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,509,453
<CGS>                                       31,059,889
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               31,059,889
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,064,002
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (869,499)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,483,936)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (1,309,009)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,174,927)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,174,927)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.19)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ENACTED UNDER
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI, Inc.  (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F.
Ambrose, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, state and
certify under oath, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION] 1350, as enacted under
[SECTION] 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of
            operations of the Company as of June 30, 2002 (the end of the
            period covered by the Report).


                                       /s/ John F. Ambrose
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       John F. Ambrose
                                       President & Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>  1
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Chip Brian, President and Chief Executive Officer of Comtex News Network, Inc.
(the "Company") certifies in his capacity as an officer of the Company that he
has reviewed the Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
December 31, 2006 and that to the best of his knowledge:

     1.   the report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) and
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

The purpose of this statement is solely to comply with Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States code, as amended by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


February 14, 2007                      /s/Chip Brian
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Chip Brian
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6221

JOSE A. LIMA,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District

Judge. (CA-98-1864)

Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 2, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose A. Lima, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Jose A. Lima seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See Lima v. Angelone, No. CA-98-1864 (E.D. Va. Jan. 13,

1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14429]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06328]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION


Data Collection Available for Public Comments

ACTION: 60-day notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Small Business Administration (SBA) intends to request 
approval, from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the 
collection of information described below. The Paperwork Reduction Act 
(PRA) of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35 requires federal agencies to 
publish a notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed 
collection of information before submission to OMB, and to allow 60 
days for public comment in response to the notice. This notice complies 
with that requirement.

DATES: Submit comments on or before May 18, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send all comments to Barbara Brannan, Special Assistant, 
Office of Surety Guarantee, Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street, 8th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barbara Brannan, Special Assistant, 
Office of Surety Guarantee, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#773516051516051659150516191916193704151659101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3d7f5c4f5f5c4f5c135f4f5c53535c537d4e5f5c135a524b">[email protected]</span></a> 202-205-6545, or 
Curtis B. Rich, Management Analyst, 202-205-7030, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#90f3e5e2e4f9e3bee2f9f3f8d0e3f2f1bef7ffe6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="294a5c5b5d405a075b404a41695a4b48074e465f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Small Business Administration (SBA) Surety 
Bond Guarantee Program was created to encourage surety companies to 
provide bonding for small contractors. The information collected on 
this form from small businesses and surety companies will be used to 
evaluate the eligibility of applicants for contracts up to $250,000.
    Solicitation of Public Comments: SBA is requesting comments on (a) 
Whether the collection of information is necessary for the agency to 
properly perform its functions; (b) whether the burden estimates are 
accurate; (c) whether there are ways to minimize the burden, including 
through the use of automated techniques or other forms of information 
technology; and (d) whether there are ways to enhance the quality, 
utility, and clarity of the information.
    Summary of Information Collection:
    Title: Quick Bond Guarantee Application and Agreement.
    Description of Respondents: Surety Companies.
    Form Number: SBA Form 990A.
    Total Estimated Annual Responses: 4,450.
    Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden: 369.

Curtis B. Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2015-06328 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8025-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
.. 

-. 

Patent Application on Facld.ld.le lnalph9l'lllen\ 

1 Jlr. Ball, In accordance with our telephone 

.. 

Paten~ Seo.aanweraaticn a terr dlQ's ago, I • 

Lap1 Dl:v., amd!na JOU h9l'9111th a copJ' of the 

OC9:la0. aket.ohea., deacript.ion and correspondence relatiw to certain 8J'8teaS 

.for ei'lCiphe:dng f'acs!aile 'llb.lch wre 

conceiwd and .tornrded to tho Patent 

Section a nud>er ot 7ear11 ago. I 

bOpe that. 1t 1a not. too late to .flle aw 

ts.~ t,r·~ of theae vat.a and' 

iD Y1w o:r the .tact t.hat pzoca•e!nc aa 

not etarted aoon atber tho recmaended. 

act.tm of tbe Patents Boal'd_, I would 

like to 8U8£&Bt that these caae• be 

slwn amo prlor1-h7 it poaslbl.e. I 

• partiaular:q interested 1n the 

one dated Janwu7 2h, 1936 because I 

believe it would be m.ucb :more prao-

. tlcable than. the other in ommaction 

with present fac:tdm!le 8711taaa. 

ln.cla. 

--CONFIDENTIAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 

I 

I
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

November 22, 2016.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-16-00471-CV

ELLEN TAUB, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVEOF THE

ESTATE OF SAMUEL TAUB, Appellant

V.

VICTOR NARCISSE, M.D. AND DAVID HO, M.D., Appellees

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2013-41311

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from orders signed April 11, 2016, and May 13, 2016. On 

October 24, 2016, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.1. The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Busby, and Wise.
Fehfmry 20, 1939r-.



### %o.z. 3. t. %-06thws~ ‘

.

Tehruary 20, 1939, Pa@ 2

Artiolc 2,"26b

astabiistesttc selary f'Or 4 court re~ortsr in count!es x~:~o?z crnst:tuteon&or inora judiciald!striotselthln tbtm3clocs. nallae County eoues under this hrtiale of tk statutesand esteblishea his salary et $5,000.00 Dar annc.

!:rtlole

2326b reada as follows: "The salary of tSe o?:'icial shorthand reporter in eaotl

JudloiaA Dlstrlot In any aountp of t?As Stat4 tfhiob alone ooaatitot4s two or =A &dlokl Dietriot& In 

### addltlon to the eompen4atLon r0r traaaotlpt fees as pro vl % ed

8 7 l a w l5 a ll b e 3S , OOO . O0 p e r a nn um, t o 8% p a ida n t5 e s a l a r y o f o t he ro o u r tx8- n o r w r a a r eaald. out oi the Rsneral ?tmd,oi
REF ID:A485554 

-

• 

• 

!Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§ 
• 

REF ID:A485554 

EXTENSION NUMBER 2JJ27 

FRa.t CINCAF FOR ACTION 

DATE 28 NOVPKBER 1941 INFOHKATION 

DECODED BY P R WHITE 

2814.30 

OPNAV 

OOMSIXTEBN 

CINCPAC 

COllFOURTEEN 

FOLLOWING 'IDKYO TO NET INTERCEPT TRANSLATION RECEIVED F10( 

SINGAPORE X IF DIPLCllATIC RELATIONS ARE ON VERGE OF BBING SEVERED 

{!oLLOWING WORDS REPEATED!.!!!. TIMES AT ~IDINNOO- AND END OF ~}-~csA: l * I oRDmARY TOKYO NIMS BROADCASTS WEL HAVE sIGMIFICANCB AS FOLLafs x 

• \ HIGASHI HIGASHI JAP .ANESE AMERICAN X KITA KITA RUSSIA X NISHI NISHI 

5Q;.I.£ N~ \.J~ 

RlGLAND INCLUDING OC<lJPATION OF THAI OR INVASION OF MALAYA AND 

NE~nl& JAPANESE LANGUAGE FOREIGN Ml!WS BROADcASTS"mE POI.LOWING 

SmlTENCES REPEATED T'NICE IN 'ftlE MIDDLE AND TWICE AT THE END OF 

BROADCASTS WILL BE USED IX .AMERICA HIGASHirNO IAZiitmoRI n E~ t~ ca:;:.~ 

EXGLAND X NISHI NO KAZE HARE X UNQUOTE X BB.lTISH AND CClfSIXTPEN 

vl ~ ~ <:G:V\:: . 

MONITORING ABOVE .BROADCASTS 

* This is in Morse code. 

rwc. ~ a.>v~ ~~ 

7 

I: x_ X.. .. - I ,
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley D. Slye, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





May 15, 2007
        /s/ Bradley D. SlyeBradley D. SlyeChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








15

---
BRIUING SHEET ~'OR THB CHAIRMAN, JODJT CHlltJi'S. OF STAFF 

JOINT CH!3r'S OF ::,'TIU'-,.· UJ<:STING, 1400, WNuAY 

5 JA..ll1UAllY 195.3 

AGENDA ITW. ?W:.IDlili 2 

J.c.s. 2074/22 

BACKGROUND: 

l. U.S. and U.Y.. cr,yptographers have tor some time worked toward replacement ot the current. Combined Cipher !.lachine (CCU). The u.s., in 1950, proposed to the U.K. that a 

c1'7Ptograph1c 1Vatem called BRUTUS be adopted as the replacement.. The U .Y • accepted BRUTUS 

and planned to incorporate it in their own national ma.chine. At the time BRUTUS was oriy,inally described to U.Y.. cryptographers, a u.s. ST&tem which is now called AOONIS was also 

demonstrated but was not proposed as a replacement tor the CW. 

2. Early in 1952 the U.h. Chiei"s ot staff indicated that adoption of one of the two U.S. 

machines nearing production (one incorporating the AOO?US system and another incorporating 

BRUTUS) appeared to be the o~ satisfactory and speedy solution to replacement ot the cc.a, 

and requested that U.S. ma.chines be provided to the u.r. and the Horth Atlantic Treat1 

Organization (?lATO) on a tree loan basis. The u.r.. Chiefs ot Sta.tr Ylere informed that one 

ot the two (AilOIUS) would be ready tor service tests by them beginning in mi.d-1952 and that 

it the tests proved the s,ystem satis.tactoey 1 a decision could t.hen be made as to the ultimate 

CCU replacement. Later the U.K. Chiefs ot Statt were informed that difficulties in product-ion 

would delay the teat.a by six months. 

3. The U.1'. Chiefs ot Statr nc»'t state (Enclosure 11 A" to J .c.s .. 2074/21) that they desire a 

decision by 1 January 195.3 as to which cr,yptographic princirle will be adopted. tor Cocbinad 

conm:unications and recommend that it be BH.ln'US, as origlnal~ agreed. 

i CURRm RltPORr: 

' 

4. The U.K. Chiefs or Statr are intonned that tor logistical reasons the u.s. Joint Chiefs 

ot statt cannot concur in the recommendation t'or BRUTUS and propose instead that: 

.!• A.JO!JIS cryptoprinciple be designated as the new Car.bined and tlA'l'O cipher system. 

b. 'nie U.K. and U.S. jointly prepare a plan tor the phased introduction ot-'AOONIS to 

begln l Januar,y 1955. 

c. The u.s. make .. wmus equipnents available to the U.K. until the UoY.. can provide its 

own - version ot !\OONIS. 

5. The reply to the U.Y.. Chiefs ot statr also gives detailed reasons tor U.S. selection ot 

ADONIS as the replacement .tor the CQ.:. 

RECOl!'.O!iHTION: 

6. It is reco.nunended that J.C. S. 

Brieting Sheet prepared by .:.:r. .tc"rank C. Austin 

Communication Security Vi.vision 

tlSA, Ext. 60489 . 

~c: Secret.al~'» ~:roint \,;h::o.efs u.f •A.a.ff 

ATr~: :.tr. ::.earney ( 5) 

NSA Pent. Liaison Group ( 2) 

' 

C.UUNK 

al, us Arrq 

al Securi t.y J\gency 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on p t0P Sii0lt2'P ea?ft'iteL JftJ""r2t 53 .. 3 

1-28-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526 Cow II ot17L copies 

TOP SECRETage 1 or 

1 

pages
<PAGE>   1
   
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

The Board of Directors
PLD Telekom Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no. 333-5398) on Form
S-4 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated March 23, 1998, relating to the 
consolidated balance sheet of PLD Telekom Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 
31, 1997, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' 
equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the year ended December 31,
1997 of PLD Telekom Inc.


                                                     KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP


New York, New York
July 22, 1998
Amended Schedule of Officers with Change of Control Agreements

         The following  executive  officers as determined by Item 402(a)(3) have
executed a Change of Control Severance Agreement  substantially identical to Mr.
Zebeck's except that initial of the times the  compensation set forth in Section
5.1(d)  the  multiplies  is as set forth  below and that the number of years for
which Section 9.3 applies is as set forth below:

                                                       Number for Section
       Officers              Date of Agreement         5.1(d)and 9.3(b)

     Douglas McCoy                4/30/98                     Two
     Douglas Scaliti              4/30/98                     Two
     Z. Jill Barclift             4/30/98                     Two
     Joseph Hoffman               4/30/98                     Two