alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.10

                    SUPERIOR CONSULTANT HOLDINGS CORPORATION

                        Amendment to Employment Agreement
                        ---------------------------------


The Employment Agreement dated January 5, 1998, as amended, between Charles O.
Bracken, ("the employee") and Superior Consultant Company, Inc., a Michigan
Corporation ("the company"), is hereby amended as follows:

1.   The section entitled "Title" is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the
     following:

         The employee's title shall be Vice Chairman of the Board.

2.   The section entitled "Salary" is deleted in its entirety and replaced by
     the following:

     Salary: The bi-weekly salary will be $12,307.70 (prorated for partial
     periods), subject to any payroll or other deductions as may be required to
     be made pursuant to law, government order, or by written agreement with or
     consent of the employee.


3.   Section H(h) entitled "Change in Control Payment" is deleted in its
     entirety and replaced by the following:

     (h)  Change in Control Payment. As used herein the term "Change in Control
          Payment" means an amount equal to three (3) time the full annual base
          salary in effect for the year of termination plus three (3) time the
          full year's bonus opportunity in effect for the year of termination.

4.   This amendment becomes effective January 4, 1999, however, the company
     explicitly reserves the right to refuse any acceptance not communicated in
     writing within one month from the above mentioned effective date. Terms of
     Employment Agreement dated January 5, 1998, as amended, will prevail until
     January 3, 1999.



                          PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
                                     PAGE 1


<PAGE>




5.   Except as amended hereof, all terms and provisions of the Employment
     Agreement dated January 5, 1998, as amended, remain in full force and
     effect.


Signatures:

Acknowledged and accepted for Superior Consultant Company, Inc.

-------------------------------     ---------------------         ------------
Name                                Title                         Date


I hereby acknowledge that I have voluntarily entered into this Amendment to
Employment Agreement after having a full and adequate opportunity to review its
provisions.

Acknowledged and accepted

-------------------------------     ---------------------         ------------
Name                                Title                         Date
A:\EA131B\bracken99\kw


                          PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL
                                     PAGE 2
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00297-CV

WESTRIDGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Appellant

v.

Omar CANALES and Marlo C. Canales,

Appellees

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Starr County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-13-976

Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The court reporter’s request for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record is 

GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due on July 15, 2016.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of June, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 15, 2016.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 15, 2016

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17A0478. THE STATE v. ERNEST KEMP.

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW 

THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
**EXHIBIT23.1**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Board of Directors

Guitar Center, Inc.:

 

We consent to theincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-110823,333-105409, 333-88677, 333-88675, 333-26257, 333-39364, 333-62610, 333-98127,333-88244 and 333-115004) on Forms S-8, S-3 and S-4 of Guitar Center, Inc. ofour reports dated March 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of Guitar Center, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2004 and2003, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity,and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December31, 2004, and the related financial statement schedule, management’s assessmentof the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as ofDecember 31, 2004, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2004, which reports appear in the December 31,2004, annual report on Form 10-K of Guitar Center, Inc.

 

/s/KPMG LLP

 

Los Angeles, California

March 9, 2005

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

                                 EXHIBIT 12 (a)

                              METRIS COMPANIES INC.
               COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                             (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                             Year Ended December 31,
                                                                             -----------------------
                                                            2002          2001          2000          1999          1998
                                                          --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
<S>                                                       <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
Earnings (loss)  before income taxes, extraordinary loss
        and cumulative effect of accounting change: (1)   $    283      $287,915      $303,723      $261,982      $107,906

Fixed Charges: (1)
       Interest on indebtedness, and
         amortization of debt expense                      103,516       166,280       133,006        55,841        30,513
       Interest factor of rental expense                     7,930         7,274         6,023         3,706         2,134
                                                          --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
       Total fixed charges                                 111,446       173,554       139,029        59,547        32,647
                                                          --------      --------      --------      --------      --------
Total available earnings                                  $111,729      $461,469      $442,752      $321,529      $140,553
                                                          ========      ========      ========      ========      ========

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                           1.00           2.66          3.18          5.40          4.31
</TABLE>

(1) As defined in Item 503(d) of Regulation S-K.
## Appendix 10.13

Reference 16:

NPPD’s letter dated April 29, 2011 to the NDEQ.
# C_2014198EN.01003501.xml

| 27.6.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/35

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

26 June 2014

(2014/C 198/03)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3606 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 138,49 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4559 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79910 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1841 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2164 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,3565 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,447 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 307,90 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1431 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,3870 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,9000 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4460 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4577 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,5475 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5531 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,7015 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 382,84 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,4987 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,4696 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,5728 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 16 469,46 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,3809 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 59,599 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 45,8775 |
| THB | Thai baht | 44,191 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 3,0112 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,7164 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 81,8809 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3606

JPY

Japanese yen

138,49

DKK

Danish krone

7,4559

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79910

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1841

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2164

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,3565

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,447

HUF

Hungarian forint

307,90

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1431

RON

Romanian leu

4,3870

TRY

Turkish lira

2,9000

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4460

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4577

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,5475

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5531

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,7015

KRW

South Korean won

1 382,84

ZAR

South African rand

14,4987

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,4696

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,5728

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

16 469,46

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,3809

PHP

Philippine peso

59,599

RUB

Russian rouble

45,8775

THB

Thai baht

44,191

BRL

Brazilian real

3,0112

MXN

Mexican peso

17,7164

INR

Indian rupee

81,8809

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
|**COREL CORPORATION SUBSIDIARIES (DIRECT AND INDIRECT)**
|--------------------------------------------------------
|                                                        
|**NAME**                                                
|                                                        
|Corel Inc.                                              
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|                                                        
|Corel International Corp.                               
|Corel do Brasil Ltda.                                   
|Corel International (UK)
Limited                        
|Corel International (France)
SARL                       
|Corel International (Germany)
GmbH                      
|Corel Corporation Limited                               
|3721035 Canada Inc.                                     
|Carleton Acquisition Co.                                
|Calgary II Acquisition Corp.                            

NOTES:

1. Indented names are subsidiaries of the entity listed immediately above such subsidiary.

2. Inclusion in this exhibit is not a representation that the subsidiary is a significant subsidiary.
Some subsidiaries may be inactive or in process of being liquidated.

3. The majority of voting shares of all subsidiaries are owned by Corel Corporation, its
subsidiaries or employee nominees.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1626

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE ANTONIO LOZANO,

Claimant - Appellant,

and

PROPERTY, 3714 CANCUN LOOP, WEBB COUNTY,

LAREDO, TEXAS, WITH ALL APPURTENANCES AND

IMPROVEMENTS THEREON,

Defendant,

HILL TOP FARM, LIMITED, a Texas Limited

Partnership,

Claimant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, District

Judge. (CA-98-11-1)

Submitted: November 7, 2002 Decided: November 13, 2002

Before WILKINS and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Antonio Lozano, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Jose Antonio Lozano appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the Government in this forfeiture

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

United States v. Lozano, No. CA-98-11-1 (M.D.N.C. May 17, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HONG KHUN,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 14

- 71237

Agency No. A095

- 192

- 389

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 11, 2017 **

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ , Circuit Judges.

Hong Khun, a native and citizen of Cambodia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ ( “BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her application for adjustment of

status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. The agency’s determination

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 19 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 71237

that an applicant knowingly made a frivolous applicati on for asylum is reviewed de

novo for compliance with the procedural f ramework set forth by the BIA,

Kulakchyan v. Holder , 730 F.3d 993, 995 n.1 (9th Cir. 2013) (citing the procedural

safeguards set forth in Matter of Y

- L

- , 24 I. & N. Dec. 151 (BIA 2007) ), and we

review for substantial evidence the agency’s findings of fact, see id. at 995. We

deny the petition for review.

The agency found that Khun was barred from adjustment of status because

s he filed a frivolous asylum application. Contrary to Khun’s contentions, t he

record supports the agency’s finding that Khun was adequately notified of the

consequences of filing a frivolous asylum application based on the notice printed

on the asylum application that she signed, and her testimony about the written and

oral warnings she received at her asylum interview. See Cheema v. Holder , 693

F.3d 1045, 1049 (9th Cir. 2012). We reject Khun’s contention that the agency

erred in finding that she filed a frivolous asylum application where she only sought

to proceed with her application for adjustment of status. See Kulakchyan , 730 F.3d

at 996 (“the only action required to trigger a frivolousness inquiry is the filing of

an asylum application”) (internal citation omitted) ; see Chen v. Mukasey , 527 F.3d

935, 943 (9th Cir. 2008) (“withdrawal of an asylum application does not obviate

the need for an IJ to determine whether a false application should be deemed

frivolous”) . Because Khun filed a frivolous asylum application, the agency3 14

- 71237

properly found her ineligible for ad justment of status. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(d)(6).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
.I, --~· t I .. t 

ii i I ! I - I ., ,., 

., 

K 

. .. - ' • w ' 

lo 

:r ... .;:.;;:. .... ~ 

. • -~ .... -:-:r. •...!-

- ---·-·--·- .. -

h•. _...:._ ___ .. _______ ·---- -- ·-- ____ .. -., .! 

... -----'------------- - __ 

~~ 

-' .. ,... ... .._.. 

-- .. oHo - 0 ·--- -- .. ---·-------- · ··----- -- -

_-______ - -----... --~----- -

--

- -~ 

,,_,.. 

-~~ 

:·-· .. 

.... ·- ~.--.:::: 

. ~- J 

:·· : -~ ---=--

·-.. - --~~ ....... -_. 

-- - -....... . -· ... ~ ~ ... ~ . 

. ~ - . . '..:, -- . • .. : ""':=·y----=- ... 

,1 ,. I • -. 

.: .. , : ... • _, • ~ I ,. 

' . . - ~1 

.- -~ .-_:.---

-· --~--. >";. "!:' .ir. _.--:. :·· .... -.-.. _. ~ .. 

-· .... : : 

. -- -.· - ;. 

. - .;.•• .. - -- ..
Exhibit 99.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIALOFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

 

 

I, Freeman A. Ford, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of FAFCO, Inc., on the Form 10Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Form 10Q, fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FAFCOInc.

 

 

By:       /s/Freeman A.Ford                            

Name: Freeman A. Ford                                 

Title:     Chairman of the Board, President, and

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

I, Nancy I. Garvin, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of FAFCO Inc., on Form 10Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003,fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that informationcontained in such Form 10Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of FAFCOInc.

 

 

By:       /s/Nancy I.Garvin                              

Name: Nancy I.Garvin                                   

Title:     Vice President of Finance and

            Chief Financial Officer
# C_2014260EN.01000601.xml

| 9.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/6

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7320 — PAI Partners / DVD Participations)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 260/04

On 4 August 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7320. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32014M7320. EUR-Lex is the online access to the European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
Martin, Michael (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Everyone: 

Martin, Michael (OST) 

Tuesday, July 29, 2014 1:47 PM 

Kelly Smith (ksmith@deltacountymi.org); mtall@escanaba.org; 

'nviau@deltacountymi.org' 

Brad Rawson; Kelly Carbone (KellyC@CharterAirTransport.com); Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); 

Harvey, Caitlin (OST) 

Essential Air Service at Escanaba, MI 

SkyWest ESC Bid 2015-16.pdf; Charter Air Transport EAS proposal- Escanaba- July 

2014.pdf 

I would like to update you on the Essential Air Service (EAS) situation at Escanaba and give you an opportunity to offer 

any comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and 

International Affairs. We issued Order 2014-6-14 on June 24, 2014, requesting proposals from airlines interested in 

providing EAS for a new term. In response to our request, SkyWest Airlines, the incumbent, and Charter Air Transport 

submitted proposals. 

I have attached each airline's proposal for your review and I expect it to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime 

this afternoon. I request that you review each proposal and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, 

but no later than Tuesday, August 19. Please send your comments directly to me via e-mail at 

michael.f.martin@dot.gov. Also, please forward this e-mail to all relevant parties that I have not included on this email. 

If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. 

Regards, 

Michael Martin 

United States Department of Transportation 

Essential Air Service (EAS) and Small Community Air Service Development Program (SCASDP) 

(202) 366-6494 

1 

c:::
Exhibit 32.1


                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                              AS ENACTED UNDER
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                ---------------------------------------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John F. Ambrose,
President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, state and certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. [SECTION] 1350, as enacted under [SECTION] 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company as of June 30, 2003 (the end of the period covered by the Report).

Date:  August 12, 2003


                                       /s/ John F. Ambrose
                                       ------------------------------------
                                           John F. Ambrose
                                       President & Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>  17
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of IGI Laboratories, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles E. Moore, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, state and certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:   (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and   (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   Date: May 16, 2011   /s/ Charles E. MooreCharles E. Moore
President and Chief Executive Officer