Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Notices 13891 

1Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov. 

2United States International Trade Commission 

(USITC): http://edis.usitc.gov. 

3Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov. 

Commission antidumping and 

countervailing duty investigations. The 

Secretary will prepare a public service 

list containing the names and addresses 

of all persons, or their representatives, 

who are parties to the investigations. 

Background 

On January 21, 2015, a petition was 

filed with the Commission and 

Commerce by United Steel, Paper and 

Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, 

Energy, Allied Industrial and Service 

Workers International Union, Pittsburg, 

PA; Domtar Corporation, Ft. Mill, SC; 

Finch Paper LLC, Glen Falls, NY; P.H. 

Glatfelter Company, York, PA; and 

Packaging Corporation of America, Lake 

Forest, IL, alleging that an industry in 

the United States is materially injured 

or threatened with material injury by 

reason of LTFV and subsidized imports 

of certain uncoated paper from China 

and Indonesia and LTFV imports of 

certain uncoated paper from Australia, 

Brazil, and Portugal. Accordingly, 

effective January 21, 2015, the 

Commission instituted countervailing 

duty investigation Nos. 701–TA–528– 

529 and antidumping duty investigation 

Nos. 731–TA–1264–1268 (Preliminary). 

Notice of the institution of the 

Commission’s investigations and of a 

public conference to be held in 

connection therewith was given by 

posting copies of the notice in the Office 

of the Secretary, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, Washington, DC, 

and by publishing the notice in the 

Federal Register of January 27, 2015 (80 

FR 4311). The conference was held in 

Washington, DC, on February 11, 2015, 

and all persons who requested the 

opportunity were permitted to appear in 

person or by counsel. 

The Commission transmitted its 

determinations in these investigations to 

the Secretary of Commerce on March 11, 

2015. The views of the Commission are 

contained in USITC Publication 4522 

(March 2015), entitled Certain Uncoated 

Paper from Australia, Brazil, China, 

Indonesia, and Portugal (Investigation 

Nos. 701–TA–528–529 and 731–TA– 

1264–1268 (Preliminary). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 12, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06043 Filed 3–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

Notice of Receipt of Complaint; 

Solicitation of Comments Relating to 

the Public Interest 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has received a complaint 

entitled Certain Protective Cases for 

Electronic Devices and Components 

Thereof, DN 3064; the Commission is 

soliciting comments on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or complainant’s filing under section 

210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.8(b)). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 

20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The 

public version of the complaint can be 

accessed on the Commission’s 

Electronic Document Information 

System (EDIS) at EDIS,1 and will be 

available for inspection during official 

business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) 

in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its Internet server at United 

States International Trade Commission 

(USITC) at USITC.2 The public record 

for this investigation may be viewed on 

the Commission’s Electronic Document 

Information System (EDIS) at EDIS.3

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission has received a complaint 

and a submission pursuant to section 

210.8(b) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure filed on behalf 

of Otter Products, LLC on March 11, 

2015. The complaint alleges violations 

of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 

(19 U.S.C. § 1337) in the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain protective cases for electronic 

devices and components thereof. The 

complaint names as respondents 

Speculative Product Design, LLC of San 

Mateo, CA; and Tech21 UK Limited of 

the United Kingdom. The complainant 

requests that the Commission issue a 

limited exclusion order, cease and 

desist orders, and a bond upon 

respondents’ alleged infringing articles 

during the 60-day Presidential review 

period pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1337(j). 

Proposed respondents, other 

interested parties, and members of the 

public are invited to file comments, not 

to exceed five (5) pages in length, 

inclusive of attachments, on any public 

interest issues raised by the complaint 

or section 210.8(b) filing. Comments 

should address whether issuance of the 

relief specifically requested by the 

complainant in this investigation would 

affect the public health and welfare in 

the United States, competitive 

conditions in the United States 

economy, the production of like or 

directly competitive articles in the 

United States, or United States 

consumers. 

In particular, the Commission is 

interested in comments that: 

(i) Explain how the articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

remedial orders are used in the United 

States; 

(ii) identify any public health, safety, 

or welfare concerns in the United States 

relating to the requested remedial 

orders; 

(iii) identify like or directly 

competitive articles that complainant, 

its licensees, or third parties make in the 

United States which could replace the 

subject articles if they were to be 

excluded; 

(iv) indicate whether complainant, 

complainant’s licensees, and/or third 

party suppliers have the capacity to 

replace the volume of articles 

potentially subject to the requested 

exclusion order and/or a cease and 

desist order within a commercially 

reasonable time; and 

(v) explain how the requested 

remedial orders would impact United 

States consumers. 

Written submissions must be filed no 

later than by close of business, eight 

calendar days after the date of 

publication of this notice in the Federal 

Register. There will be further 

opportunities for comment on the 

public interest after the issuance of any 

final initial determination in this 

investigation. 

Persons filing written submissions 

must file the original document 

electronically on or before the deadlines 

stated above and submit 8 true paper 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

13892 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 51 / Tuesday, March 17, 2015 / Notices 

4Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures: 

http://www.usitc.gov/secretary/fed_reg_notices/

rules/handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf. 

5Electronic Document Information System 

(EDIS): http://edis.usitc.gov. 

copies to the Office of the Secretary by 

noon the next day pursuant to section 

210.4(f) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

§ 210.4(f)). Submissions should refer to 

the docket number (‘‘Docket No. 3064’’) 

in a prominent place on the cover page 

and/or the first page. (See Handbook for 

Electronic Filing Procedures, Electronic 

Filing Procedures 4). Persons with 

questions regarding filing should 

contact the Secretary (202–205–2000). 

Any person desiring to submit a 

document to the Commission in 

confidence must request confidential 

treatment. All such requests should be 

directed to the Secretary to the 

Commission and must include a full 

statement of the reasons why the 

Commission should grant such 

treatment. See 19 CFR § 201.6. 

Documents for which confidential 

treatment by the Commission is 

properly sought will be treated 

accordingly. All nonconfidential written 

submissions will be available for public 

inspection at the Office of the Secretary 

and on EDIS 5. 

This action is taken under the 

authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act 

of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. § 1337), 

and of sections 201.10 and 210.8(c) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (19 CFR §§ 201.10, 210.8(c)). 

Issued: March 12, 2015. 

By order of the Commission. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06042 Filed 3–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

[OMB Number 1140–0062] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed eCollection 

eComments Requested; Identification 

of Imported Explosive Materials 

AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives, Department of 

Justice. 

ACTION: 60-day Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Justice 

(DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, 

Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will 

submit the following information 

collection request to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review and approval in accordance with 

the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

DATES: Comments are encouraged and 

will be accepted for 60 days until May 

18, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have additional comments 

especially on the estimated public 

burden or associated response time, 

suggestions, or need a copy of the 

proposed information collection 

instrument with instructions or 

additional information, please contact 

Anita Scheddel, Explosives Industry 

Programs Branch, at eipbinformationcollection@atf.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written 

comments and suggestions from the 

public and affected agencies concerning 

the proposed collection of information 

are encouraged. Your comments should 

address one or more of the following 

four points: 

• Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

• Evaluate the accuracy of the 

agency’s estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

• Evaluate whether and if so how the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information to be collected can be 

enhanced; and 

• Minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of appropriate automated, 

electronic, mechanical, or other 

technological collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

Overview of This Information 

Collection 1140–0062 

1. Type of Information Collection: 

Extension without change of an existing 

collection. 

2. The Title of the Form/Collection: 

Identification of Imported Explosive 

Materials. 

3. The agency form number, if any, 

and the applicable component of the 

Department sponsoring the collection: 

Form number: None. 

Component: Bureau of Alcohol, 

Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

4. Affected public who will be asked 

or required to respond, as well as a brief 

abstract: 

Primary: Business or other for-profit. 

Other: None. 

Abstract: The information is necessary 

to ensure that explosive materials can be 

effectively traced. All licensed 

importers are required to identify by 

marking all explosive materials they 

import for sale or distribution. The 

process provides valuable information 

in explosion and bombing 

investigations. 

5. An estimate of the total number of 

respondents and the amount of time 

estimated for an average respondent to 

respond: An estimated 15 respondents 

will spend 1 hour placing marks of 

identification on imported explosives 3 

times annually. 

If additional information is required 

contact: Jerri Murray, Department 

Clearance Officer, United States 

Department of Justice, Justice 

Management Division, Policy and 

Planning Staff, Two Constitution 

Square, 145 N Street NE., Room 3E– 

405B, Washington, DC 20530. 

Dated: March 12, 2015. 

Jerri Murray, 

Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

[FR Doc. 2015–06054 Filed 3–16–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act 

On March 11, 2015, the Department of 

Justice lodged a proposed Consent 

Decree with the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of 

Illinois in the lawsuit entitled United 

States v. Pharmacia LLC and Solutia 

Inc., Civil Action No. 13–0138. 

The United States filed this lawsuit 

under the Comprehensive 

Environmental Response, 

Compensation, and Liability Act 

(‘‘CERCLA’’). The United States’ 

complaint names Pharmacia LLC and 

Solutia Inc. as defendants. The 

complaint requests recovery of oversight 

and other response costs that the United 

States incurred in connection with an 

Administrative Order for Remedial 

Design and Interim Remedial Action, 

Docket No. V–W–02–C–716, issued by 

EPA on September 30, 2002 (the ‘‘2002 

Order’’), to prevent groundwater 

contamination releasing to the 

Mississippi River adjacent to Sauget 

Area 2 disposal Site R and the resulting 

impact area located in Sauget, St. Clair 

County, Illinois. Both defendants signed 

the Consent Decree, agreeing to pay a 

total of $1.7 million in response costs. 

In return, the United States agrees not 

to sue the defendants under sections 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES