alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934**

I, Kenneth Brizel, the principal executive officer of LightPath Technologies, Inc. certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Light Path Technologies, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting. 

Date: September 26, 2006
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon Consumer
     Products Corporation (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002
     as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
     (the "Report"), I, Douglas H. Greeff, Chief Financial Officer of the
     Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
     pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
     best of my knowledge:


              (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


              (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
     all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
     the Company.



     /S/ DOUGLAS H. GREEFF
     -------------------------------
     Douglas H. Greeff
     Chief Financial Officer
     March 27, 2003


     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
     Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
     the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes
     of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order entered May 31, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00072
- CV SHANIKA MONTGOMERY, Appellant

V. PC THE RIDGE ON SPRI NG VALLEY, Appellee On Appeal from th e County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 07116
- A



### O RDER The reporter’s record in this case has not been filed. By letter dated May 13, 2019, we informed appellant the court reporter notified us that the reporter’s reco rd had not been filed because appellant had not (1) requested the record; or (2) paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record. We directed appellant to provide the Court with written verification showing the reporter’s record had been requested and that appellant had paid for or made arrangements to pay for the record or had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to provide the required documentation within ten days might result in the appeal be ing ordered submitted without the reporter’s record. To date, appellant has not provided the required documentation nor otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding thestatus of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal submitted witho ut a

reporter’s record. Appellant’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Air T, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Walter
Clark, Chief Executive Officer, and John Parry, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 
 (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and
 
 (2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.
 
 
 
 Date:  January
30, 2009
 
 
 
 /s/ Walter
Clark
 Walter
Clark
 Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 
 
 /s/ John
Parry
 John
Parry
 Chief Financial
Officer
REF ID:AS/~ , /3 I /?3 J, ~ 

~ c/ ""' ... '"";I; ,.;Iii~ 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 1 1-19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 
REF ID:A52209ea-

------ -~-~--

... ------~----~--- -- -------~-----
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2216 

To require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of State to develop 

a plan for the relocation and admission to the United States of certain 

citizens of Afghanistan, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. KENNEDY (for himself and Mrs. BLACKBURN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of 

State to develop a plan for the relocation and admission 

to the United States of certain citizens of Afghanistan, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Our Afghan Allies 

5 Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2216 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE PLAN FOR RELOCATION 

2 AND ADMISSION TO THE UNITED STATES OF 

3 CERTAIN CITIZENS OF AFGHANISTAN. 

4 (a) PLAN REQUIRED.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense, in 

6 coordination with the Secretary of State, shall de7 velop a plan for the relocation and admission to the 

8 United States pursuant to special immigrant visas of 

9 citizens of Afghanistan who are aliens described in 

10 section 602(b)(2) of the Afghan Allies Protection 

11 Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–8; 8 U.S.C. 1101 

12 note). 

13 (2) ELEMENT.—The plan required by para14 graph (1) shall provide for the relocation and admis15 sion of such citizens of Afghanistan before the date 

16 on which the withdrawal of the United States Armed 

17 Forces from Afghanistan is completed. 

18 (b) SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 30 

19 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec20 retary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate commit21 tees of Congress the plan developed under subsection 

22 (a)(1). 

23 (c) APPROPRIATE COMMITTEES OF CONGRESS DE24 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘‘appropriate commit25 tees of Congress’’ means— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2216 IS

1 (1) the Committee on Armed Services, the 

2 Committee on Foreign Relations, and the Committee 

3 on the Judiciary of the Senate; and 

4 (2) the Committee on Armed Services, the 

5 Committee on Foreign Affairs, and the Committee 

6 on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 12, 2019

No s . 04

- 18

- 00802

- CR & 04

- 18

- 00803

- CR

Kenton Lance LIGHT

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appell ee

From the 216th Judicial District Court, Gillespie County, Texas

Trial Court No s . 6330 & 6328

Honorable N. Keith Williams, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s second motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Appellant’s brief is due

July 8, 2019. No further extensions will be granted absent extenuating circumstances.

_

________________________________ Liz a A. Rodriguez , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of June, 2019

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
PLD Telekom Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated March 21, 1997,
related to the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for PLD Telekom Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996, which
report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the
year ended December 31, 1998 of PLD Telekom Inc.




KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants


Calgary, Canada
August 27, 1999
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7067

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JOSE ANGEL PEREZ, a/k/a Angel,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District

Judge. (CR-93-26-F)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jose Angel Perez, Appellant Pro Se. John Douglas McCullough,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

Appellant's motion for a reduction of sentence. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Perez, No. CR-93-26-F (E.D.N.C. May 23,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Statement of the Air and Radiat ion Management Administration Department of the Environment for the Public Hearing Relating to Proposed Amendments to COMAR 26.11.01.01 and COMAR 26.11.06.14 Concerning Prevention of Significan t Deterioration (PSD) Requirements held on May 28, 2009 Baltimore, MD

My name is Carl York. I am the Special Projects Manager for the Regulation Development Division of the Air and Radiation Management Administration, Department of the

Environment.

This public hearing is being held pursuant to the requirements of 40 CFR Section 51.102 and Sections 2-301 et. seq. of the Environment Artic le, Annotated Code of Maryland. It is also being held in conformance with the State Administrative Procedures Act under the State Government Article, beginning at Section 10-101.

Notice of this hearing appeared in the:

Maryland Register on April 24, 2009; MDE's website from April 21, 2009 to May 28, 2009; Baltimore Sun on April 24, 2009; Saint Mary's Enterprise on April 24, 2009; Cumberland Times-News on April 24, 2009; Frederick News-Post on April 24, 2009: Salisbury Daily Times on April 24, 2009; and the Washington Post on April 23, 2009.

Copies of these notices were submitted for the record.

Copies of this proposed action and supporting documents were made available for review by the State Clearinghouse and are also submitted at this time into the hearing record. Copies were also made available for public inspection at the Air and Radiation Management Administration offices in Baltimore, Cumberland, and Salisbury, and at all local health departments or local air quality control offices.

The purpose of today's hearing is to give the public an opportunity to comment on proposed amendments to COMAR 26.11.01.01 and COMAR 26.11.06.14 concerning Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) requirements.

Summary

The purpose of this action is to update Maryland's adoption of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Prevention of Signi ficant Deterioration (PSD) requirements found under 40 CFR Part 52.21 to include the changes in the July 1, 2008 edition of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).

12 This action also clarifies the meaning of the terms “Administrator” and “Reviewing Authority”

as used in 40 CFR Parts 52.21 and 52.1116.

Maryland’s State Implementation Plan (SIP)

These amendments will be submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as a revision to Maryland’s State Implementation Plan.

Consideration of Comments

The Department will consider all comments before making a decision to adopt these

amendments.

L:\AQPlanning and Monitoring\Regulation Development Division\Hearing Materials & Notification\Hearing Statements\Hearing Stmt - 2009 PSD update.doc
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

Ortec International, Inc.

New York, New York

We    hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements    on Form S-8 (No. 333-80799) of our report dated June 18, 2007 relating to    the consolidated financial statements, which appear in this Form 10-KSB.    Our report contains an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’sability to continue as a going concern. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

 

New York, New York

June 18, 2007

 

 

R-221 (12/05)

 

 

----
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17I0072. RICKY D. LOCKAMY v. MARGIE LOCKAMY.

Ricky D. Lockamy filed this application seeking interlocutory review of the trial

court’s order reforming the parties’ 2009 divorce decree. The Supreme Court has

appellate jurisdiction over all divorce and alimony cases, including those cases

ancillary to the divorce proceedings. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par.

III (6); Morris v. Surges, 284 Ga. 748, 750 (2) (670 SE2d 84) (2008). Because the

underlying subject matter of this application is divorce, it is hereby TRANSFERRED

to the Supreme Court for disposition.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

C l e r k ’ s O f f i c e ,

Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/14/2016

November 14, 2016
ri'l·. 

- ' 

• 

7 lul7 1944 

so Projeot lo. 252'1 

hoject • {'l{OXA•2i l • (C1tu) 

DEVELOPMENT 

A c1"Jbe• taoaim11e 83'8tem Whe~e!n eaci!)horlng ot 

the taoa1m1le aignal la aoom1'11•hed bJ :revera1ne; the pol•rl\J' of the s1an&l 1n a "l'l4om unner at a r.1nohronoue rat•• 

7urpoae ez_pbJect1ve !2,be AttalBfd.r 

Development ·and con•truction ot equ1Jnent tor t1'0 ex~rS.mental tem1nal1 to• employine; the above system. '?he 

equipment shall be appllcabl• to the pz:e9en' v.ar De'08rtment 

telephoto notwork:.. The equ1pnent shall aff ol'd. • high degre• 

or aeourity for telephoto tre.na~1as1one. 

@r!Jl!h pr 91iher arienoi Reg~ating tihe- hoJeot 1. 

C 8"noh. 

Apprsemnt o ,coaj 1 

~on11Mot r t27, 500. 

(1to11•• '!h9- above cont•aot oo•t le ln •441t!on to 

to .,o,ooo pNrate4 fl'Om Contract W4fl.•ll4-•o•U) 

'l?tme 1t19uS.af tor gpmpieta1on.1 

Gls Kontb.a. 

' !Q9•1 Develoment I or aar.at?NlOt I 

Contract 1 RCA - Contract 'No. W44-ll4-ac'-34 

eclassifi ed and a ursuantto E .0. 1352
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 223 SSM 34

Miriam Levy Oates, as 

Administratrix of the Estate of 

Rachel Levy, Deceased, et al.,

 Respondents,

 v.

New York City Transit Authority,

 Appellant,

et al.,

 Defendants.

Submitted by Lawrence Heisler, for appellant.

Submitted by Paige R. Butler, for respondents.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules,

order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division correctly

determined that legally sufficient evidence supported the jury's

findings of negligence and entitlement to damages for decedent's

conscious pain and suffering. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges

Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided November 17, 2016
REF ID:A40087 

• 1th ~. b~~ e-v-

~· ~o~ 

<j :t!- () ~ t;l • \ 

SUPREME 'COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. 

0CTOBI:R TERM:, 1945 

ORDER 

IT Is ORDERED that the portion of Rule 46 of the Rules of 

P1act1ce fo1 the Cou1ts of the Uruted States m Admnalty and 

Maritmie Jurisdiction which was adopted by the Supreme Court 

of the Umted States on June 8, 1942, and provides for the l.Dl.· 

pounding of proceedings m admnalty cases be, and the same IS 

hereby, suspended 

IT Is FURTHER ORDERED that the followmg p1ovis1on be, and 

the same is hereby, added to Admualty Rule 46 

"Ne1the1 the plam language nor the coded text nor the 

exact translation of any message or dispatch encoded oi 

encyphered by any department or agency of the Umted Statec;i 

or by any government allied with the United States m wa1 

shall be. placed of iecord m pleadmgs, evidence, 01 testimony 

or disclosed m anv manne1 in any proceed.mg without the 

prior consent of the department 01 agency of the Umted 

States or allied government which encoded or encyphered 

such message or dispatch A paraphrase of the substance of 

such message 01 dJ.ispatch, prepared and cei tilled as such by 

an o:ffi.cei o.f such department or agencv, shall be adm.1ss1ble 

fo1 all purposes for which the plam language message or 

dispatch would, sa' e for this i ule, have been admitted '' 

May 6, 1946 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a ..
NO. 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

FC BACKGROUND, LLC,

Petitioner,

v.

LEE FRITZE,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review from the Fifth Court of Appeals

Dallas, Texas

No. 05-17-00277-CV

PETITIONER’S OPPOSED MOTION TO 

EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW

Petitioner, FC Background, LLC, asks the Court to extend the time to file its

Petition for Review.

1. Petitioner is FC Background, LLC; respondent is Lee Fritze.

2. This motion is filed within the 15-day period to file a motion to 

extend the time to file a petition for review, as required by Texas Rule of Appellate 

Procedure 53.7(f).

3. Respondent opposes this motion.

4. The Court has the authority under TEX. R. APP. P. 53.7 to grant 

petitioner additional time to file a petition for review.

FILED

17-1053

12/22/2017 1:32 PM

tex-21463345

SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK
2

5. The 5th Court of Appeals issued its judgment in FC Background, LLC 

v. Lee Fritze, Cause No. 05-17-00277-CV, on November 16, 2017.

6. Petitioner’s petition for review is due to be filed on January 2, 2018.

7. Petitioner requests an additional 30 days to file the petition for review, 

extending the time to February 1, 2018.

9. No extension has been previously granted to extend the time to file the 

petition for review. 

5. Petitioner needs additional time to file its brief because counsel for 

Petitioner will be out of the state for the holidays. 

6. Respondent opposes this 30-day extension. 

PRAYER

For these reasons, petitioner asks the Court to grant an extension of time to 

file the petition for review until February 2, 2018.

Respectfully submitted,

DUNN SHEEHAN LLP

 /s/ Cari B. LaSala

William D. Dunn

Texas Bar No. 24002023

ddunn@dunnsheehan.com

Cari B. LaSala

Texas Bar No. 24087890

clasala@dunnsheehan.com
3

3400 Carlisle St., Suite 200

Dallas, Texas 75204

(214) 855-0077 (Phone)

(214) 866-0070 (Fax)

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

Counsel for Petitioner, Cari LaSala, contacted counsel for Respondent, 

Robin Foret on December 22, 2017. Respondent opposes the requested extension 

of time for 30 days for filing FC Background’s Petition for Review.

 /s/ Cari B. LaSala

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify on December 22, 2017I served a copy of Petitioner’s Opposed 

Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for Review on Respondent by electronic

filing.

 /s/ Cari B. LaSala
Exhibit 23.1

               CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
CapMAC Holdings Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-05429) on Form S-8 of CapMAC Holdings Inc. of our reports dated January 29,
1997, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of CapMAC Holdings Inc. and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated
statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, and all related schedules,
which reports appears in the December 31, 1996, annual report on Form 10-K of
CapMAC Holdings Inc.


/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

New York, New York
March 24, 1997