alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2302 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2302

 To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to assign certain 
  functions to the Assistant Secretaries of Energy relating to energy 
        emergencies and energy security, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2021

 Mr. Barrasso introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Department of Energy Organization Act to assign certain 
  functions to the Assistant Secretaries of Energy relating to energy 
        emergencies and energy security, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENERGY EMERGENCY AND ENERGY SECURITY FUNCTIONS ASSIGNED TO 
              ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF ENERGY.

    (a) In General.--Section 203(a) of the Department of Energy 
Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7133(a)) is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), in the second 
        sentence, by striking ``, but are not limited to,''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(12) Energy emergency and energy security functions, 
        including--
                    ``(A) responsibilities with respect to 
                infrastructure, cybersecurity, emerging threats, 
                supply, and emergency planning, coordination, response, 
                and restoration; and
                    ``(B) on request of a State, local, or Tribal 
                government or energy sector entity, and in consultation 
                with other Federal agencies, as appropriate, provision 
                of technical assistance, support, and response 
                capabilities with respect to energy security threats, 
                risks, and incidents.''.
    (b) Coordination.--The Secretary of Energy shall ensure that the 
functions of the Secretary of Energy described in paragraph (12) of 
section 203(a) of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 
7133(a)) are performed in coordination with relevant Federal agencies.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2097 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2097

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
 permissible first-dollar coverage of telehealth services for purposes 
                      of health savings accounts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 17, 2021

  Mr. Kennedy introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the 
 permissible first-dollar coverage of telehealth services for purposes 
                      of health savings accounts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telemedicine Everywhere Lifting 
Everyone's Healthcare Experience And Long Term Health HSA Act of 2021'' 
or the ``TELEHEALTH HSA Act of 2021''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXEMPTION FOR TELEHEALTH SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 223(c)(2) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``In the case of 
plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2021, a plan'' and 
inserting ``A plan''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Clause (ii) of section 223(c)(1)(B) of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``(in the case 
of plan years beginning on or before December 31, 2021)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to plan years beginning after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
fs1ex10xvii_vendum.htm



Exhibit 10.17


 







 


 


Principal Amount: $7,000.00         


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


 


  


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Vendum Batteries, Inc., a Nevada corporation (or its successor or assigns) promises to pay to the order of $7,000.00 to LAURAG ASSOCIATES S.A, an organisation, at Trident Chambers, Road Town, P.O. Box 146, Tortola, BVI, by the holder of this Note, the principal sum of $7,000.00 in U.S. currency.


 


The entire amount of principal with five percent (5%) interest per annum shall become due and payable on 30th April 2011.


 


This Note is unsecured. The undersigned and its successors and assigns, hereby waives presentment and demand for payment, diligence, notice of dishonor, protest and notice of protest of this Note, and any defense by reason of an extension of time for payment or other indulgence. Failure of the holder to assert any right herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver thereof. 


 


 Signed this 31st day of March, 2011. 


 




	 	Vendum Batteries, Inc.	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	Signature:	/s/ Fraser Cottington	 



 


	 	
By: 

	Fraser Cottington	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Its:	Chief Executive Officer	 
	 	 	 	 







 


 




	LAURAG ASSOCIATES S.A.	 
	 	 	 
	
Signature:

	 	 
	 	 	 
	Title:
# C_2014274EN.01000201.xml

| 21.8.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 274/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 274/2

---

Euro exchange rates (1)

1

20 August 2014

(2014/C 274/02)

1 euro =

1 euro =

| | Currency | Exchange rate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| USD | US dollar | 1,3284 |
| JPY | Japanese yen | 137,23 |
| DKK | Danish krone | 7,4560 |
| GBP | Pound sterling | 0,79810 |
| SEK | Swedish krona | 9,1651 |
| CHF | Swiss franc | 1,2106 |
| ISK | Iceland króna | |
| NOK | Norwegian krone | 8,2035 |
| BGN | Bulgarian lev | 1,9558 |
| CZK | Czech koruna | 27,928 |
| HUF | Hungarian forint | 313,25 |
| LTL | Lithuanian litas | 3,4528 |
| PLN | Polish zloty | 4,1828 |
| RON | Romanian leu | 4,4220 |
| TRY | Turkish lira | 2,8866 |
| AUD | Australian dollar | 1,4295 |
| CAD | Canadian dollar | 1,4549 |
| HKD | Hong Kong dollar | 10,2959 |
| NZD | New Zealand dollar | 1,5836 |
| SGD | Singapore dollar | 1,6594 |
| KRW | South Korean won | 1 358,26 |
| ZAR | South African rand | 14,1898 |
| CNY | Chinese yuan renminbi | 8,1562 |
| HRK | Croatian kuna | 7,6195 |
| IDR | Indonesian rupiah | 15 565,29 |
| MYR | Malaysian ringgit | 4,2070 |
| PHP | Philippine peso | 58,250 |
| RUB | Russian rouble | 48,1988 |
| THB | Thai baht | 42,461 |
| BRL | Brazilian real | 2,9932 |
| MXN | Mexican peso | 17,3788 |
| INR | Indian rupee | 80,6450 |

Currency

Exchange rate

USD

US dollar

1,3284

JPY

Japanese yen

137,23

DKK

Danish krone

7,4560

GBP

Pound sterling

0,79810

SEK

Swedish krona

9,1651

CHF

Swiss franc

1,2106

ISK

Iceland króna

NOK

Norwegian krone

8,2035

BGN

Bulgarian lev

1,9558

CZK

Czech koruna

27,928

HUF

Hungarian forint

313,25

LTL

Lithuanian litas

3,4528

PLN

Polish zloty

4,1828

RON

Romanian leu

4,4220

TRY

Turkish lira

2,8866

AUD

Australian dollar

1,4295

CAD

Canadian dollar

1,4549

HKD

Hong Kong dollar

10,2959

NZD

New Zealand dollar

1,5836

SGD

Singapore dollar

1,6594

KRW

South Korean won

1 358,26

ZAR

South African rand

14,1898

CNY

Chinese yuan renminbi

8,1562

HRK

Croatian kuna

7,6195

IDR

Indonesian rupiah

15 565,29

MYR

Malaysian ringgit

4,2070

PHP

Philippine peso

58,250

RUB

Russian rouble

48,1988

THB

Thai baht

42,461

BRL

Brazilian real

2,9932

MXN

Mexican peso

17,3788

INR

Indian rupee

80,6450

---

(1)  Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

1

Source

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Metris Companies Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John A. Witham, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of
                           Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
                           of 1934; and

                  2.       The information contained in the Report fairly
                           presents, in all material respects, the financial
                           condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                            /s/ John A. Witham
                                            -----------------
                                            John A. Witham
                                            Executive Vice President and Chief
                                            Financial Officer
                                            April 9, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [Order No. 1967]

Pursuant to its authority under the Foreign-Trade Zones Act of June 18, 1934, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the Board) adopts the following Order:

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopted the alternative site framework (ASF) (15 CFR 400.2(c)) as an option for the establishment or reorganization of zones;                

*Whereas,*                     the City of Bangor, grantee of Foreign-Trade Zone 58, submitted an application to the Board (FTZ Docket B-67-2014, docketed 09-23-2014) for authority to reorganize under the ASF with a service area of the Counties of Hancock, Penobscot, Piscataquis, Waldo and Washington, Maine, within and adjacent to the Bangor Customs and Border Protection port of entry, and FTZ 58's existing Site 1 would be categorized as a magnet site;                

*Whereas,*                     notice inviting public comment was given in the                     **Federal Register**                     (79 FR 58318, 09-29-2014) and the application has been processed pursuant to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations; and                

*Whereas,*                     the Board adopts the findings and recommendations of the examiner's report, and finds that the requirements of the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations are satisfied;                

*Now, therefore,*                     the Board hereby orders:                

The application to reorganize FTZ 58 under the ASF is approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including Section 400.13, and to the Board's standard 2,000-acre activation limit for the zone.

      ( print page 14973)    
Signed at Washington, DC, this March 12, 2015.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Enforcement and Compliance, Alternate Chairman, Foreign-Trade Zones Board.

Attest:

Andrew McGilvray,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-06457 Filed 3-19-15; 08:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
# C_2014134EN.01000201.xml

| 3.5.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.5.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/2

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.7218 — Brookfield/APMTNA/APMT Elizabeth)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2014/C 134/02

On 25 April 2014, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English language and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

1

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7218. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32014M7218. EUR-Lex is the online access to European law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

1

---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

912 

KA 15-01301 

PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., LINDLEY, NEMOYER, AND SCUDDER, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

EDDIE WASHINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

EDDIE WASHINGTON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of

the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of

the Onondaga County Court (Thomas J. Miller, J.), entered July 1,

2015. The order denied the motion of defendant pursuant to CPL

440.10. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed for reasons stated in the decision at County

Court.

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

Shelter Properties III

2000 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000353282
<NAME>                              Shelter Properties III
<MULTIPLIER>                                         1,000

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   605
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            161
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                27,784
<DEPRECIATION>                                        16,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        12,952
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                7,792
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                             4,271
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          12,952
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       2,886
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       2,395
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       337
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             491
<EPS-BASIC>                                             8.84 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1445

MICHAEL HODGES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

RONDELLE HERMAN, Judge; CAREY T., Agent DCSE; CRAIG M. BURSHEM, 

Director DCSE; TAWANA MONTAGUE, Payroll,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:19-cv-00953-HEH)

Submitted: September 29, 2020 Decided: October 13, 2020

Before KING and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Hodges, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Michael Hodges seeks to appeal the district court’s memorandum order dismissing 

his complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). “An order 

dismissing a complaint without prejudice is not an appealable final order under § 1291 if 

‘the plaintiff could save [the] action by merely amending [the] complaint.’” Goode v. Cent. 

Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015) (quoting Domino Sugar 

Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993)). Because 

the grounds for the district court’s dismissal “did not clearly preclude amendment,” id. at 

630, we conclude that the court’s order is neither a final order nor an appealable 

interlocutory or collateral order. 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and remand to the district 

court with instructions to allow Hodges to amend the complaint. Id. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2483

SAMUEL NDUNGU MBURU,

Petitioner,

v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals. 

Submitted: October 27, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before TRAXLER, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Japheth N. Matemu, MATEMU LAW OFFICE P.C., Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Petitioner. Benjamin C. Mizer, Principal Deputy 

Assistant Attorney General, Linda S. Wernery, Assistant 

Director, William C. Minick, Trial Attorney, Office of 

Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,

Washington, D.C., for Respondent. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Samuel Ndungu Mburu, a native and citizen of Kenya, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the immigration 

judge’s decision finding him inadmissible and thus ineligible 

for adjustment of status. Mburu “bears the burden of proving 

that he clearly and beyond doubt is not inadmissible” under the 

false claim bar of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6)(C)(ii)(I) (2012). 

Dakura v. Holder, 772 F.3d 994, 998 (4th Cir. 2014) (alteration

and internal quotation marks omitted). Based on our review of 

the record, we conclude that substantial evidence supports the 

agency’s finding that Mburu failed to credibly establish that he 

is not inadmissible for falsely representing himself to be a 

citizen of the United States. We therefore deny the petition 

for review for the reasons stated by the Board. In re Mburu

(B.I.A. Oct. 26, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
### COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST FOR IMPERIAL COUNTY 8-HOUR OZONE RACT SIP SUBMllTAL Planning Area: Imperial County Air Pollution Control District 

### of Plan Submissions

2.1(e) Evidence of Compliance with State's Procedural Requirements dings," 2009 RACT cation," and ARB 2.l(f) Evidence of Public Notice Consistent with

ation that Plan /Implementation Protects