alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Elite Unmanned Aerial Systems, LLC

 101 Lightwater Court

 Aberdeen, NC 28315

 785-979-8560

 ELITEUAS@GMAIL. COM

September 30, 2015

U .S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE

Washington, DC 20590

FAA Regulatory Docket FAA-2015-2272

Response to FAA for Additional Information with Regards to the Public Interest

NAME AND ADDRESS OF PETITIONER

Elite Unmanned Aerial Systems, LLC

Attn: John P. Cross

101 Lightwater Ct.

Aberdeen, NC 28315

785-979-8560

ELITEUAS@GMAIL. COM
I. Public Interest and Safety 

1. The requested exemption would support an application for a commercial Certificate of 

Authorization to use the DJI Inspire 1 to conduct aerial photography and videography to 

support the needs of the real estate, agriculture, wildlife preservation and oil and gas 

industries.

2. The UAS is powered by batteries, is smaller, lighter and more maneuverable than 

larger aircraft running on combustible fuel. It operates at lower altitudes within line of 

sight and there are no passengers onboard diminishing the likelihood of death, serious 

bodily injury or property damage. With a small payload, maximum flight time of only 18

minutes and strict pilot oversight there will be little or no risk to national security.

3. Low level oblique photos and video from several angles are far more effective than 

ground-based imagery for displaying the characteristics of large, complex properties or 

areas. The alternative to UAS enabled aerial photography and videography would be to 

charter a full-sized helicopter or plane, which has proven more costly than many 

potential clients are able to afford. 

4. The benefits of reduced cost, increased competition and improved quality of

presentation from the UAS will benefit many the needs of the real estate, agriculture, 

wildlife preservation and oil and gas industries. Stimulating growth in the UAS sector by 

providing competitive services to the above mentioned industries will help to stimulate 

the local economy and emerging spin off industries it is sure to create. 

John P. Cross

President and CEO

Elite UAS
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/17

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
# CE2004088EN.01024901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/249 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/249

---

(2004/C 88 E/0253)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0929/04

by Glyn Ford (PSE) to the Commission

(26 March 2004)

Subject:   Promotion of dairy products

Subject:

I have received a letter from a constituent who has asked if there is provision for the promotion of the dairy industry in the UK. My constituent sells milk-based products and saw the EU-sponsored adverts for milk on television and wondered if there were other funded schemes available.

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(29 April 2004)

(29 April 2004)

The promotion exercise referred to by the Honourable Member is part of a national milk promotion campaign, organised by the Dairy Council with joint co-financing (United Kingdom 50 %) from the European Union.

The Commission jointly funds programmes to promote certain European Union agricultural products, milk and dairy products being amongst the sectors eligible for support. Promotion campaigns such as this one are generic in nature and never in favour of any particular brand names or enterprises. They highlight the advantages of European produce in terms of quality, food safety, nutrition, labelling, animal welfare and respect for the environment.

The procedure is that the Authority in the Member State responsible for this exercise (in the case of the United Kingdom this is the Rural Payments Agency) invites professional or inter-professional organisations representative of their particular sector to submit draft promotion or information programmes. In cooperation with an implementing agency selected by a competitive tendering process, the professional body drafts a programme according to strict eligibility criteria. There are also set conditions by which the programme must give due acknowledgement of Community assistance.

The Directorate-General for Agriculture has a website offering more detailed information and the address is as follows: (http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/prom/index_en.htm). This provides a full explanation, including the legal regulatory basis for the programmes (Regulations (EC) No 2826/2000 (1) and (EC) No 94/2002 (2)).

1

2

In addition to the programme organised by the Dairy Council, there is a Community co-financed milk promotion campaign currently active in United Kingdom schools organised by Dairy Industry Association Ltd.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 of 19 December 2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market, OJ L 328, 23.12.2000.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 94/2002 of 18 January 2002 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 2826/2000 on information and promotion actions for agricultural products on the internal market, OJ L 17, 19.1.2002.

2

---
WRPLOT View - Lakes Environmental Software

WIND ROSE PLOT:

Colorado Springs Municipal Airport - August 2014 to November 2015

Colorado Springs, CO

COMMENTS: COMPANY NAME:

MODELER:

DATE:

1/28/2016

PROJECT NO.:

NORTH

SOUTH

WEST EAST

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

WIND SPEED 

(m/s)

 >= 11.10

 8.80 - 11.10

 5.70 - 8.80

 3.60 - 5.70

 1.50 - 3.60

 0.50 - 1.50

Calms: 0.15%

TOTAL COUNT:

11368 hrs.

CALM WINDS:

0.15%

DATA PERIOD:

Start Date: 8/14/2014 - 00:00

End Date: 11/30/2015 - 23:59

AVG. WIND SPEED:

4.23 m/s

DISPLAY:

 Wind Speed

Direction (blowing from)
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6221

JOSE A. LIMA, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge. (CA-98-1864) Submitted: May 25, 1999 Decided: June 2, 1999 Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jose A. Lima, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Jose A. Lima seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Lima v. Angelone , No. CA-98-1864 (E.D. Va. Jan. 13, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
REF ID:A39622..._ 

MEMO FOR RECORD 

The attached were photographed from the "record of inventions" kept 

by Don seiler when he ran the Code & Signal laboratory at the Washington 

Nav;y Yard. Item /fl03 shows a means of controlling the stepping of 

"cryptograJiiic rotors" by serrling circuits through a set of 5-point 

"control rotors". Date of conception June 21, 1932. I got these photos 

through Capt. Safford, who told me that Seiler and Nav;y did nothing 

toward trying out or exploiting Seiler•s idea in this case. It is 

important to note in this connection that the date of my conception of 

electric control of stepping of cryptographic rotors {U.S. Pat. App. 

No. 682,096- On M-134-A) is April 23, 1932. 

Seiler 1 s invention has some bearing on Rowlett•s invention and concept of using rotors in cascade as a key generator; it appears that 

Seiler anticipated Rowlett in that idea, first described in Rowlett 1 s 

paper dated 29 June 1935. See folder on SISDE /Ill - Patent papers on 

SIDABA. 

29 June 1951 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pursuant to E.O. 135213 
. . . . 

REF ID:A39622 

• • 

ORKR£CORO 

OF 

OoNAL/J W. SE!LEf? 
• 

REF ID:A39622 

• 

y 

''"~' z
Exhibit 23.1






INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
Numbers 33-89692, 33-53852 and 33-67644 of Danskin, Inc. And Subsidiaries on
Form S-8 of our report dated March 14, 1997 (except for Note 11 for which the
date is March 27, 1997) appearing in and incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on form 10-K of Danskin, Inc. And Subsidiaries for the year ended
December 28, 1996.




DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
New York, New York


March 28, 1997
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bradley D.Slye, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| May 14, 2004 | /s/ Bradley D. Slye                                           |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|         | Bradley D. Slye                                               |
|         | Principal Executive Officer and  Principal Accounting Officer |

 

----
U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management Facility

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12­140

Washington, DC 20590

Application to Amend

Section 333 Exemption No. xxxxx

Regulatory Docket No. FAA­2016­8663

Wednesday, November 2nd, 2016

Petitioner:

A Top Shot LLC

Austin Hilgenberg, CEO

1695 Hunter Drive

Wayzata, MN 55391

Email: Austin@atopshot.com

Dear Sir or Ma’am,

By letter from the FAA dated Dec 30th, 2015, an exemption was granted to A Top Shot LLC for relief

under Section 333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption Regulatory Docket No.

FAA­2015­8663

Austin Hilgenberg hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include UAS

SHOTOVER U1 models. Relevant facts and reasoning are:

• SHOTOVER have developed a commercial grade UAS that adheres to the FAA rules and

regulations.

• Similarities to SHOTOVER U1:

o Pixhawk flight controller

o Flight modes: Loiter, Altitude hold, Return to Launch and Land

o Emergency modes: Loss of comms, Low battery, Return to Launch, etc

o Voltage/current sensor

o Communications: 915Mhz for Telemetry, 2.4 for R/C control and 5.8Ghz for video

• Size, weight and performance specification of the SUI Endurance are as follows:

o Flying weight: 30KG (66LBS)

o Diagonal Size: 1651mm

o Maximum climb rate: 600 feet/minute

o Maximum descent rate: 600 feet/ minute

o Maximum pitch/roll angle: 150 Degrees/second

o Maximum flight time: 15 minutes

Privacy

The UAS SHOTOVER U1 Operating and Maintenance Handbook will be submitted separately and

confidentially under 14 C.F.R. 11.35(b), as the Handbook contains proprietary information that the

applicant has not and will not share with others. The Handbook contains operating conditions and

procedures that are not available to the public and are protected from release under the Freedom of

Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 552, et seq. (submitting the manual/handbook is optional/not required by the

FAA)

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional information

that is required.

Sincerely,

Austin Hilgenberg

CEO, A Top Shot LLC
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 19, 2019

t0612 

# Order

Clerk June 19, 2019

159002

ROBERT F. BROZ and KIMBERLY BROZ,

Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

v SC: 159002

COA: 340381

Otsego CC: 12

- 014346

- NM

PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC,

Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 11, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is con sidered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE P art II.A. of the Court of Appeals

judgment addressing professional negligence (malpractice), and we REMAND this case

to that court for reconsideration of that issue i n light of Cox v Flint Bd of Hosp Mgrs , 467

Mich 1 (2002) (holding MCL 600.2912a does not apply to nurses). In all other respects,

leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining question

presented should be reviewed by this Cou rt.

We do not retain jurisdiction.
*Wednesday, July 28, 1999*

MOTION DOCKET

98-1686.

#### Ezawa v. Yasuda Fire & Marine Ins. Co. of Am.

Franklin App. No. 97APE10-1343. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On July 15, 1999, appellants filed a notice of supplemental authority citing a decision of this court. Whereas, S.Ct.Prac.R. 111(3) permits only the filing of a relevant authority issued by *another*court after the deadline for filing a jurisdictional memorandum,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellants’ notice of supplemental authority be, and hereby is, stricken.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information (prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada) extracted from the
accounting records of Mitel Corporation and included in the Consolidated 
Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended June 28, 1996 and the 
Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 28, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such financial statements. For purposes of this schedule,
<EPS-PRIMARY> is <EPS-BASIC> under Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles.
[/LEGEND]
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-28-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                    1.0
<CASH>                                           7,567
<SECURITIES>                                   120,853
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,556
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,697
<INVENTORY>                                     80,369
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               347,873
<PP&E>                                         365,016
<DEPRECIATION>                                 213,420
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 510,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          130,594
<BONDS>                                          4,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     37,200
<COMMON>                                       152,593
<OTHER-SE>                                     126,422
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   510,683
<SALES>                                        158,134
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               158,134
<CGS>                                           76,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                69,173
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 544
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,909
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,705
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,705
[EPS-PRIMARY]                                     0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
        
                                   4    

</TABLE>
#### Nelson and others, Appellants, vs. Jacobs and others, Respondents.

*September 25*

*October 12, 1900.*

*Nelson v. Stephens, ante,*p. 136, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Dane •county: R. G. Siebeckee, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

For the appellants the cause was submitted on the brief of *Bashford, Ayhocvrd*cfc *Spensley.*

[No appearance for the respondents.]

*By the*Oourt.—

The facts stated, the assignment of errors, and the questions involved in this case are the same as were involved in the case of *Nelson v. Stephens, ante,*p. 136. The conclusion in that case was adverse to the defendants here. The case having been tried, and the evidence being before the court, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded with directions to enter judgment for plaintiffs for the penalty of the bond, with costs.

-Cassodat, C. J., took no part.
EXHIBIT 32(a)

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics,  Inc. (the "COMPANY")
on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ending  December  31,  2005,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "REPORT"),  the
undersigned,  the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"),  hereby certifies to the best
of the undersigned's  knowledge and belief,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

         Date: February 13, 2006     BY:  /s/  ROBERT A. LERMAN
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                           Robert A. Lerman
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934, except to the extent that the Company  specifically  incorporates it by
reference.






                                  Page - 17 -
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 43 / Thursday, March 5, 2015 / Presidential Documents 12069 

Notice of March 3, 2015 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Zimbabwe 

On March 6, 2003, by Executive Order 13288, the President declared a 

national emergency and blocked the property of certain persons, pursuant 

to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–1706), 

to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy 

of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine 

Zimbabwe’s democratic processes or institutions. These actions and policies 

had contributed to the deliberate breakdown in the rule of law in Zimbabwe, 

to politically motivated violence and intimidation in that country, and to 

political and economic instability in the southern African region. 

On November 22, 2005, the President issued Executive Order 13391 to 

take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in 

Executive Order 13288 by ordering the blocking of the property of certain 

persons who undermine democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe. 

On July 25, 2008, the President issued Executive Order 13469, which expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 

13288 and authorized the blocking of the property of certain persons determined to have engaged in actions or policies to undermine democratic 

processes or institutions in Zimbabwe, to commit acts of violence and other 

human rights abuses against political opponents, and to engage in public 

corruption. 

The actions and policies of these persons continue to pose an unusual 

and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States. For 

this reason, the national emergency declared on March 6, 2003, and the 

measures adopted on that date, on November 22, 2005, and on July 25, 

2008, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond March 

6, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national 

emergency declared in Executive Order 13288. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with O1

12070 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 43 / Thursday, March 5, 2015 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

March 3, 2015. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05338 

Filed 3–4–15; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with O1OB#1.EPS</GPH>
### -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0

39.0 39.5 

## ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL