alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM SIERRA PACIFIC DEVELOPMENT FUND MARCH 31, 1998 FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          87,520
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,929
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,724
<PP&E>                                       5,937,010
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,028,362
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,377,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          104,275
<BONDS>                                      1,753,005
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,499,431
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,377,325
<SALES>                                        203,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               203,881
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  125,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                91,716
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              39,521
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (47,577)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (47,577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (47,577)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.62)
        

</TABLE>
Motion denied and Order filed February 2, 2023. 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-22-00464-CV

____________

JOE Y. ROGERS, III, Appellant

V.

SANDRA ROGERS MILLER, AS INDEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR 

WITH WILL ANNEXED OF THE ESTATE OF JOE Y. ROGERS, JR., 

Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Williamson County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 17-0461-CP4A

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was originally due October 24, 2022. We granted three

extensions of time to file appellant’s brief until January 23, 2023. When we granted 

the final extension, we noted that no further extensions would be granted absent 

exceptional circumstances. No brief was filed. On January 26, 2023, appellant 

proceeding pro se filed a further request for extension of time to file his brief. We 

deny the request and issue the following order.
2

We order appellant to file a brief with the clerk of this court on or before 

February 23, 2023. If appellant does not timely file the brief as ordered, the appeal 

is subject to dismissal without further notice for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Zimmerer.
TO: 

-.--Chief 11F11 Branch 

_Ass't. Chief 

_F ¢ 

~Legal Pro9urement 

____ Executive Sec'y 

_Fl 

_F2 

__ F4 

_F5 

_F6 

___ Property Officer 

_il·~ail Desk 

_Forward to 

File (Indicate No.) -.-.-

Information ~ Return ---- Inf0rro.ation & F:l.le 

Bulletin Board 

Information of All 

mm.;:: DATE· 

ypin.g __ _ 

Correction 

lfocessar;~,r - .rl.ction -----

RESTRICTED ursu nt to E.O. 1
• REF ID:A67652 -

XB fill 

UNITID STATES PATENT OPF!CI 

IN REI lpp:Lioa\taa ot - WII.t.JAM P • l'lU'EDRd • 

- S.nal lo. .. 5'11172 • 

Filed -- 25 Augallt 1')64 • 

• 

,.. 

AU'l'JmHT?ClTING DEVlCE -

• 

... 

---------·~---~----

TOa The ~ OCWl•af.olwr ot P&tc'U ~,1>.,C. 

Stitt 

'1'h!.tl s.a 1" ftapout to Pa~ omoe anion dated 3 retaw.rr 19'.' 

ill tba aticn. 141D'W'ie4 appUoau.on. 

D \'HE CUI~Ba 

Cldm 1 

C1aSa ,, Um ' ... Cancel "anotbw niteb• -1 Smart - • ~ -· 

Line 6 - 0-. "OO'lll"088. to ... ---... • 

c>asa 4 

Cl&Sa ~. L1ne 2 • Ouoe.1. "or the l!Jot•. 

J.!ne 5 • Cf.Doel na CC*ltu\" ea! !DHrt •GM ot a UmlW 

....... ct contaota • • 

n.aae aM the toll-S. olaimt 

6. In a 4-S. ot tM •ture dt:tecribed, a ..,.. .. ot cur:f'tld, a 

.-.. ot o~ i..-. had»& a P1tll'aliv ot inpuU .m a piu... 

nJ.lif' ot outpgta, a ~ adapted to Dake fl\ICOMdft oSrcnd.te 1-... 

aid 80la'Ce ot ourNa\ u4 • lild.W number ot p:eaelecrhd input. to -.14 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-06-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
I ll i i } 4'111 

I f f It • c: ' • • t: IE .. ~ f I 

1 i ' r i ' t ' t ~ ~ I ' i I i ' 

a i i i f J J J I t l : I ~ 2 ~ • i I I 

~ .Fff 1i ~i:iJ:. ,1 l 

i I I ! ~ ~ ~ i l I ~ t I i f ' ~ r l 

frff"' tt~I~ ;.~~~I ii!1lt ilc ~(ill ~'rr il ~ 

tlifl liJf~ii!~ 11111 lr~tr I' ;,i,11f ,., 

I f I t f • ' t i • f • 

• 

~ 

hj 
REF ID:A67652 

It ma.)I' be noted, in .,.._.esponse to the Exmniner's quel'T as to the 

ditrerence between nn authtmtioator and a cryptograph, that the to.rmr 

1a a special 088e or the 11.1.tter. While most cryptographs can be aaed 

to authenticate, the cont.rary ta not tn10 except that one or a. aa1l. 

number or characters U8U8 lly a~ f'nciphered in an authenticating 

operation. A £urther dis tine\ 1.on is that no purpose 1s served in an 

authmlticator bJ' Bll3' JJ.'188.m) tor a 'SipberiM: as both correspoJden'8 

normal.1"' porf'orm nnot]¥ the same ., teps in authenticating a 

coamnmioaticm. 

In Claim 5. in adclition to tllfJ oanoellation or the expresaian 

"or tho liken, the o).aim an amended brings out the seleotion by the 

laat-montioned swii,,ch or a contac-t {'f a p,roup or a limlted number. 

Claim 6 srACirical]J includu the structure lll-112 ot Figure 2. 

It ditterentJ.ates i"rm tho references as explained below. 

With •.teprd to the references cited, none 0£ tbem shows the 

ealeotor-·tne switch oalled tor 1'1 most or the- claims nor the device 

or pre8,alect1ng a llm1ted numb1n" ot inputs to the rotor maze, llDI" 

the me ans 11 either ~ or rJpeoU'ioalq, tor va171.ng the va1ll88 

of tt!e output 1nd1oatora11 thra latter two o:t which f'eatUNS AN ot 

part :;1cular import.anae. 

Continuad prosecution under the three-year rule 1s dea1red. 

lleapeoUul.J¥. 

WILLI.All F. FRIEDlfAN, Appl.lead' 

Hie Att.cmier 

' I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         988,586
<SECURITIES>                                 1,186,101
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,662,944
<ALLOWANCES>                                    10,000
<INVENTORY>                                  3,857,963
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,746,301
<PP&E>                                       2,808,419
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,291,003
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,515,957
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,311,598
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     5,219,201
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,044,810
<SALES>                                     11,801,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,044,025
<CGS>                                        5,554,037
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,107,645
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,651,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             115,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,400,499
<INCOME-TAX>                                   504,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            896,499
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   896,499
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .15
        

</TABLE>
1

Filed 11/16/16

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE et al., )

)

Plaintiffs and Respondents, )

) S214855

v. )

) Ct.App. 2/1 B237153

COMMISSION ON STATE MANDATES, )

) Los Angeles County

Defendant and Respondent; ) Super. Ct. No. BS130730

)

)

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., )

)

Real Parties in Interest )

and Appellants. )

____________________________________)

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND

DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING

THE COURT:

The opinion in this matter filed on August 29, 2016, and appearing in the 

California Official Reports at 1 Cal.5th 749, is modified as follows:

On page 768 of the published opinion, a footnote is inserted at the end of the 

sentence that reads: “The board’s legal authority to administer the CWA and its 

technical experience in water quality control would call on sister agencies as well as 

courts to defer to that finding.” The new footnote, which is numbered as footnote 15, 
2

reads: “Of course, this finding would be case specific, based among other things on 

local factual circumstances.”

On page 771 of the published opinion, current footnote 15 is renumbered as 

footnote 16.

On page 772 of the published opinion, the word “fatally” is deleted from the 

sentence that reads: “The fact the EPA itself had issued permits in other cities, but 

did not include the trash receptacle condition, fatally undermines the argument that 

the requirement was federally mandated.”

This modification does not affect the judgment.

The request for judicial notice and the petition for rehearing, both filed on 

September 13, 2016, are denied.
REF ID:A104621 

1.00.IDRANDUM FOR AFSA-12 

AFSA-OOT/ef 

lB DEC 1950 

SUBJECT: Comments on proposed AFSA Regulation on Patents 

1. '!he principal question which occurs to me is whether an 

AFSA Regulation should be promulgated in advance of more detailed 

information from the Government Patents Board itself'. Very lit'l:.le 

has been issued by the Board so far; an AFSA Regulation may- be a 

bit premature. 

2. I understand that the Signal Corpe is working on some 

similar paper for that Service. Perhaps we should wait until l'1e 

can study the Signal Corps regulation. 

3. Recommend deferring action on this for a few waeks. Mo 

harm will came from such delay, as the Executive Order is now in 

ef'fect and covers all interests of the Government. 

WILLIAM F. FRIBDMA•r 

AFSA-OOT 

....... , 

.· ... ;_,.~ 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-17-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

.. -
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7810

BRUCE M. FRENCH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus WARDEN GREENE, Brunswick Correctional Center; R. MCDILDA, Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-97-1997-AM) Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999 Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce M. French, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The district court order was filed November 24, 1998. 2 PER CURIAM: Bruce French appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See French v. Greene , No. CA-97-1997-AM (E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 1998). * We further deny French’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JASON O’NEIL,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ 

§ No. 38, 2018

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§ 

§ Cr. ID No. 1107024171A (K)

§

§

§

Submitted: November 2, 2018

 Decided: December 14, 2018

Before VALIHURA, SEITZ, and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, we 

conclude that the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of and for the 

reasons assigned by the Superior Court’s opinion, dated December 18, 2017, 

denying the appellant’s first motion for postconviction relief. 

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Superior 

Court is AFFIRMED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor

Justice
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05262]



[[Page 12246]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Delegation of Authority No. 382]


Delegation by the Secretary of State to the Under Secretary of 
State for Arms Control and International Security With Respect to 
Authority Under Section 1203 of the Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense 
Authorization Act

    By virtue of the authority vested in me as Secretary of State, 
including Section 1 of the State Department Basic Authorities Act and 
by the Fiscal Year 2014 National Defense Authorization Act, Public Law 
113-66 (NDAA), I hereby delegate to the Under Secretary of State for 
Arms Control and International Security the authority to provide 
concurrence on Department of Defense security assistance activities 
pursuant to Section 1203 of the NDAA.
    The duties, functions and responsibilities delegated may be re-
delegated to the Assistant Secretary of State for Political-Military 
Affairs. Any act or other authority cited herein is considered to be 
such act or other authority as amended from time to time.
    Notwithstanding this delegation of authority, the Secretary, the 
Deputy Secretary, or the Under Secretary for Political Affairs may 
exercise any authority or function delegated herein.
    This delegation of authority shall be published in the Federal 
Register.

    Dated: January 26, 2015.
John F. Kerry,
 Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-05262 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company      for the periods reflected therein. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      March 12, 2010 | /s/ Michael G.      Livingston          |   |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------|--------|
|                      | Michael      G. Livingston              |
|                      | President,      Chief Executive Officer |
|                      |                                    |
|                      | /s/ John E. Porter                      |   |
|                      | John      E. Porter                     |
|                      | Chief      FinancialOfficer             |

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States, Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure.

# ACTION:

Revised Notice of Proposed Amendments and Open Hearing.

*Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcements:*79FR 48250, 79FR72702 and 80FR41.                

# Please note:

 The public hearing on the amendments to the Appellate Rules and Forms previously scheduled in Washington, DC for March 6, 2015, was canceled due to weather conditions. That public hearing has been rescheduled for April 1, 2015, at 10:00 a.m. in the Mecham Center of the Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE., Washington, DC 20544.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Appellate Procedure has proposed amendments to the following rules and forms:

Appellate Rules 4, 5, 21, 25, 26, 27, 28.1, 29, 32, 35, and 40, and Forms 1, 5, 6, and New Form 7.

                        Written comments and suggestions with respect to the proposed amendments were accepted from August 15, 2014 through February 17, 2015. In accordance with established procedures, all comments submitted are available for public inspection and can be found along with the text of the proposed rules amendments and the accompanying Committee Notes at the United States Federal Courts' Web site at                         *http://www.uscourts.gov/​rulesandpolicies/​rules/​proposed-amendments.aspx.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary, Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Judicial Conference of the United States, Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building, One Columbus Circle NE., Suite 7-240, Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: March 6, 2015.

Rebecca A. Womeldorf,

Rules Committee Officer, Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 2015-05598 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 2210-55-P
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2114 

To expand the definition of qualified persons for purposes of the Public 

Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act to include health professional students. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 17, 2021 

Mr. KELLY (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, 

Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To expand the definition of qualified persons for purposes 

of the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness 

Act to include health professional students. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Assisted Vac5 cination Effort Act’’ or the ‘‘SAVE Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. QUALIFIED PERSONS. 

7 Section 319F–3(i)(8) of the Public Health Service 

8 Act (42 U.S.C. 247d–6d(i)(8)) is amended— 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2114 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; or’’ and 

2 inserting a semicolon; 

3 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as sub4 paragraph (C); and 

5 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the fol6 lowing: 

7 ‘‘(B) a medical, nursing, pharmacy, phar8 macy intern, midwife, paramedic, advanced or 

9 intermediate emergency medical technician, 

10 physician assistant, respiratory therapy, dental, 

11 podiatry, optometry or veterinary student 

12 with— 

13 ‘‘(i) appropriate training in admin14 istering vaccines, as determined by the stu15 dent’s school or training program; and 

16 ‘‘(ii) supervision by an individual de17 scribed in subparagraph (A); or’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBC07HB2PROD with BILLS
# CE2004088EN.01023801.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/238 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/238

---

(2004/C 88 E/0240)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0864/04

by Nelly Maes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(22 March 2004)

Subject:   Linguistic diversity

Subject:

With reference to my question E-2825/03 (1) of 23 September 2003 and the answer of 23 October 2003 given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission, I should like to put the following supplementary question.

1

The Copenhagen criteria cite the protection of minority languages as one aspect of a good minority policy. Will this no longer apply after accession? How do the European Union and the European Commission intend to monitor this in practice?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

From 1 May 2004 the Acceding Countries will become full Member States of the European Union. The framework that applies will therefore no longer be the Copenhagen Accession Criteria, but rather, the Union's standard working arrangements.

In this context, and as set out in Article 6 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), the Union is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, which are common to the Member States. If there is a serious or persistent breach of the principles, the Commission or one third of the Member States may refer the matter to the Council, meeting in the composition of the Heads of State or Government.

Those rights have been solemnly reaffirmed by the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. Article 21(1) refers to the prohibition of discrimination based, among other things, on ethnic origin, language, religion or membership of a national minority, and Article 22 requires that the Union respect cultural, religious and linguistic diversity.

---

(1)  OJ C 65 E, 13.3.2004, p. 225.

1

---