alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2101 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to extend the Land and Water 

Conservation Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 

Mr. BURR (for himself, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. DAINES, Mr. GARDNER, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. BENNET, Mr. LEAHY, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to extend the Land 

and Water Conservation Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LAND AND WATER CONSERVA4 TION FUND. 

5 Section 200302 of title 54, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 

8 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2015’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘November 30, 2015’’; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2101 IS

1 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘September 

2 30, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘November 30, 2015’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 2109

In re: DEANDRE JOHNSON , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 2:1 9

- cv - 00562

- RAJ

- LRL )

Submitted : December 22, 2020 Decided: December 29, 2020

Before NIEMEYER, FLOYD, and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Deandre Johnson, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Deandre Johnson petitions for a writ of mandamus , seeking an order directing the district court to comply with Supreme Court precedent and afford due process to Virginia prisoners. We conclude that Johnson is not entitled to mandamus relief.
Mand amus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018)

. M andamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795. Further,

m andamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4th Cir. 2007). The relief sought by Johnson is not available by way o f mandamus. Instead , the arguments that Johnson now presents should be first raised, if at all, in pursuing 28 U.S.C. § 2254 relief in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection  with the Annual Report of Dynex  Securities  Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Stephen J.  Benedetti,  the  Principal  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial
Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to and for  purposes  of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that to my knowledge:


         (1)      The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of  Section
                  13(a)  or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.




April 15, 2004                       /s/ Stephen J. Benedetti
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Stephen J. Benedetti
                                     Principal Executive Officer
                                     Chief Financial Officer



                                      I-3
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 30, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

134595 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

GREGORY A. TURNER,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 134595 

 COA: 275575 

WCAC: 05-000254 

DETROIT BOARD OF EDUCATION,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 10, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

t0123 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 30, 2008 

 Clerk
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joel F. Gemunder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Omnicare, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.
  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 (the “Periodic Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and2.
  The information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: May 8, 2008

/s/ Joel F. GemunderJoel F. GemunderPresident and Chief Executive Officer


E-5

---
Exhibit 12(a)

                             XEROX CREDIT CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (In Millions)

                         Nine Months Ended
                           September 30,         Year Ended December 31,

                            1999   1998     1998    1997   1996   1995   1994

Income before income taxes $ 149  $ 101    $ 137   $ 123  $ 123  $ 119  $ 147

Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense (2)
     Xerox debt               25     14       23       3      5      6      5
     Other debt              161    164      217     214    199    213    197
       Total fixed charges   186    178      240     217    204    219    202

Earnings available for
  fixed charges            $ 335  $ 279    $ 377   $ 340  $ 327  $ 338  $ 349

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges (1)         1.80   1.56     1.57    1.57   1.60   1.54   1.73


(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing
     total earnings available for fixed charges by total fixed charges.

(2) In 1994, debt was assigned to discontinued operations based on the net
assets of the discontinued operations and the debt-to-equity ratios in
accordance with the Company's guideline. This practice was discontinued
in 1995, because the amount of interest expense that would have been
allocated to discontinued operations had become insignificant. All
interest expense is now being reported within continuing operations and
included in the fixed charges.
























13
REF ID:A42955 

---------

-------------- ·--------------

----------

-- -------·-------·------------ ------

-------·-----------··----------

-------------------------- . -------

- ·--- - --·· .... -·-·. ---------·-------------------------------------------------------

------------

-------------- ------

------ ---- -- ·--- -- --- ------- ------· ---------------------------

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 10-28-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a __ _
REF ID : A3 6352 a~ '· 

l. IncJ.om)(l ~th is a propoood ~~....nt toe the subject application .. 

2. 1'he ~"Iloent IlU8t lJe on file in the Patent Ottico 113' 3 Auguat 1945. 

l !J:el. 

~tindup 

t'.t'.Bl:tE:<Jet{ L. tOKlmwt 

Ce.ptai.ntc .Sigml Co.t""pS 

8.EPll secu:rit.r ~CT 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 07-29-2014 pursuant. to E.O. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CAPMAC
HOLDINGS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS FOR THE YEAR ENDING
DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME, STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY AND CASH FLOWS, FOR THE YEAR THEN ENDED AND THE NOTES THERETO AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                           339174
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                          0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                            0
<EQUITIES>                                     0
<MORTGAGE>                                     0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                 374060
<CASH>                                         966
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                             0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         45380
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 457234
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                10985
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                            68262
<POLICY-OTHER>                                 0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                15000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       164
<OTHER-SE>                                     310223
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   457234
<PREMIUMS>                                     40557
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            17906
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             (1804)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 27320
<BENEFITS>                                     4815
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                    7824
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           22200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                47937
<INCOME-TAX>                                   14712
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   33568
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.89
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                 6548
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                            0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                              0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                             0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                               0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                10985
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                        0
        


</TABLE>
REF ID:A39683 

• 

n • nmv s••• r•mz •• 

Jn n applioaUca afa 

WflH• r. rr1ec1llln ad rs.kB. lawlett 

IW'AIC9"C 

... CamiHiaaer of Patent., 

............. ,D,O. 

811'• 

m,y. ,, 

Plea• reoopi• J.fr. ?M111M D. Rall, Pat.nt, s.at!cm, 81(...:L 

Cal'pe, 1111' Departmlnt, li"alh!llgtoa, n.c., u our prisud.pml atw_,. 

!lie JlftYSDm ,_.. ot attonlq la Dot nwbl&J lNt M ts M Cllarl.M 

.A • ._ u oonaanm, bu lapM bJ reuon ot Id.a dH\h, 

wffUW '·. npg 

..... iOl.Dlft 

, 

~" 

~ .. .-· 

!Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Neuromodulation
Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30,
2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, F. Robert Merrill III, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify to the best of my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer
of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate,
effective as of November 8, 2004. /s/F. Robert Merrill IIIName:
    F. Robert Merrill IIITitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT STEVE SIMON and MAX JACQUES,

Appellants,
v. ADALBERTO JARAMILLO, LLC; and ADALBERTO JARAMILLO,

Appellees. No. 2D22-4126
January 31, 2024 Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.130 from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Christopher C. Nash, Judge. Christopher M. Palermo of the Law Offices of Christopher Palermo, P.A., Lutz, for Appellants. Mya M. Hatchette of Maynard Nexsen P.C., Winter Park, for Appellees. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. KELLY, VILLANTI, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
A.ND REFER TO INITIAL.$ 

AND No, 

N$T;y"Ca•e No. 3249 

OP&I;oa:A.:MOH; Jb 

' I 

-~ ,,_. • I.~ 

- :. : f, r:· :: . .. . .- . ..,..: ,, l . 

: '!·· . . ' . . _·....... . 

·t-·111 ...... : '·:'. ~-: ~-.:-.-, • ., 

~ I ·. . I " 

, "' ...... , '•I"' --'; "'!'. 

.. - . .. ' :... :•·I ~ ... .. ... ... .. ... . , 1:--· . ' j "' .'·,. ! ·> ·•.;, ~~ . • " . ·:' '-· :·:-· ~ ... - . . . . ., "'."7 -':'.~-"~ ··:,.f 

.. 

,,L'lo 

- .r- .. j- : . '' . 6 ·-·Ac ri"~S .. ,ij '·~ t•.;l : 1' . 

. Subj: 

. ·.·· 

I ' . . . .. . .. " 

·capt_. -Laura;tce r ._ S~f'!ord.. USN, ~ure~u. ~t. _N~".':IA · (Officer) Per11onnel~ lfavy D~e.rtment, Washington, . . ; . , ···.. . . ... •.-

. . ..... 

Patent a:P1'11cat1on 'ger'1"'1 No. 568~368, tiled 1:; 

Deceinber 1944 tor Con~rol. OircUit• to:r :lleotr!a· ~od11ig Machine•. i · · 1 

•· • • . • ·'" 

. •, ...... 

·.' 

-·- . ·, , - .. ~ ~·· ·.:· .. '.: 

. I ',•'•'.I 

~ -;,• '. ':' ·-· ' --'" ,, t· -

..... -... 

. .. , .. _ /': ,· ... • . 

,; ... ' .I:~ .. .". '. - •"" .. · 

. '· 

~Y direction'. oi the Director. ,\ 

! ' 

Encl~ · 1. Cop;y ltr Commt.Bioner of Patent• . -·: - dated 28. Feb 1945 and cop/,' ot ·a~s!gnnient·. 

'-·· '~~-"Pf'ET . - ... ~.1 t ·-

,. 

·.l.· .. 

• t .. -~ _ _. ... : ..... ~/~,,_-· 

) 

~. . ..... -:-·;·. _ ....... !..:.". 

11" • 

. !":.Iii~--; 

.. ~ •v .- -

.~.J •.• '"·. 1. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuant to ~.O._ 135~aJ-,~"'1'.S-J-"f~~~T~~-l . .. ... · ~ ·_,.:;:,: :- . .... - .. ·.· "; ... _,-:-.. '·
_/--- - - - --..- -- - -- - - ' -

REF ID:A66737 

(Buie ltr1 JAG,D/A, of 25 Feb 195.3, aubj1 R. R. ll52, 83rd 

CoDCl'I••, lat Session, a Bill "For tha Ballet ot 

William F. J\oiecbnaAG) 

lat Ind Serial• 

6 MAR 1953 

':153 

2. llir. Friedllan'a current Civil Service title 1s Reseuch 

Consultant; his organizational title is Special Assistant (to the 

Director). Ilia compenaaiion was 1.ncnaaed cm 29 April 1951 from 

$10,750 per year to eu,ooo per y-ear (step increase) and to 

$11,800 on 'Z'I October 1951 (general par increase). 

Inell 

n/o 

CCa AG·~-~.:--; c/s 4 • 1---....... _ 

S/Asst 

R/D (2) 

3012 

.3024 

M/Rs The indo 

the backgroUDd er 

£m DIRAFSA to JAG, ~~ 

\ . ' 

(L ~ -, 

RALPH J. CANIN!l: 

lajor General, us A:nq 

.~--=D~ tor 

2 

I 

A17 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

I 

._..-,I ~· 

v 

,./ 

/ 

I 

, 

I 

~
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
Doc ID: 2770448
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I, Kenneth Brizel, the principal executive officer of LightPath Technologies, Inc. certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Light Path Technologies, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and 

 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting. 

 

Date: September 21, 2005
pproved for 

elease by NSA on 

4-10-2014
Qffice Memorandum • uNITEn sTATEs GovERNMENT 

TO : Mr. Friedr.nn. DATE: 11 June 1952 

FR.OM m·. Barlou 

SUBJECT: Discussion with Lt. Col. Henn-Collins, Royal Signals, Concernine 

ECI·VSIGABA Principles 

J.. In London during the 1951 Confermce, Lt. Col. IIen.Yl-Collins 

was heckling :me concerning the U. s. policy of non-disclosure of the 

ECIVSIGABA to tho British. He described with considerable enjoyment 

his experiences :Ln 1942 and l943 in North Africa where for many months 

he was a SIGABA repairman for a section of the 9th Air Force. He 

described repair on the SIGABA with ·the SIGKKK ma.in.tonancc manual and 

related that after he had been using this manual for months to repair 

ma.chines 1 he finally decided t:ti.a t it uould be simpler if he were 

issued a SIGKKK rather than have to borrow it from the Signal Center 

Officer on each occasion. ~owever, when he wrote a letter forrrl1.lly 

asking for issuance of the :mmmal, he described the hurried confusion 

of the 9th Air Force upper echelons as they refused his request. 

However, he still maintained tho SIGABAs. \'n-ien bluntly asked exactly 

bow much he did know, be was able to describe the crypto-principlc 

in complete detail, apologizing for the section that he could. not 

remember, namely the exact banding on the end plate of the control 

maze, but otherwise the d:U:.gra.m he drew was complete~ accurate. 

2. He also had related to Dick Chiles ·!;he fact that he didn•t 

think much of the crypto-pr-'..1.I1ciple originally, being· convinced that 

the future trend in the cryptographic field uas toua.rd electronic 

on-line equipments, but J;J.ter on uhcn ncircuit Mercury" was designed, 

he resurrected the principle and "imp~ovcd it sufficiently to be 

adequate for their pur-posesn and gave the principle to the RAF for 

incorporation in "11ercury'1 in 19W+. 

~(J~ 

HOWARD C. BARLOW 

Chief Communication 

f:ecurh 'i:qu·rment Division 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-26-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

SEeRET