alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Trade Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Renee Chapman, Contact Representative, or Theresa Kingsberry, Legal Assistant, Federal Trade Commission, Premerger Notification Office, Bureau of Competition, Room CC-5301, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 326-3100.

By Direction of the Commission.

Donald S. Clark,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-05919 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6750-01-M
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2270 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2270

    To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the 
 entities will not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity 
                      that performs, an abortion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2021

 Mrs. Blackburn (for herself, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Braun, Mr. Daines, Mr. 
Wicker, Mr. Tillis, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Tuberville, 
  Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, and Mr. Scott of Florida) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
          Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the 
 entities will not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity 
                      that performs, an abortion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Life and Taxpayers Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ABORTION.

    (a) Prohibition.--No Federal funds may be provided (directly or 
indirectly, including through contract or subcontract) to an entity 
unless the entity certifies that, during the period for which such 
funds are provided, the entity will not perform, and will not provide 
any funds to any other entity that performs, an abortion.
    (b) Exception.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to an 
abortion where--
            (1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or incest; or
            (2) a physician certifies that the woman suffers from a 
        physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness that 
        would place the woman in danger of death unless an abortion is 
        performed, including a life-threatening physical condition 
        caused by, or arising from, the pregnancy itself.
    (c) Hospitals.--Subsection (a) does not apply with respect to a 
hospital, so long as such hospital does not, during the period for 
which funds described in subsection (a) are provided to such hospital, 
provide funds to any non-hospital entity that performs an abortion 
(other than an abortion described in subsection (b)).
    (d) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) The term ``entity'' means the entire legal entity, 
        including any entity that controls, is controlled by, or is 
        under common control with, such entity.
            (2) The term ``hospital'' has the meaning given such term 
        in section 1861(e) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
        1395x(e)).
                                 <all>
```
_, 

. ~ 

REF ID:A66459 . 

ll Ja.nutJ.l'1 1954 

EO 3.3(h) (2) 

PL86-36/50 USC 3605 

SUBJEC'lt General McClure' I Renarka on the Report ot the 

Special Stuey Group 

~h reference• pertain to the numbered p&ragra;pha at General. 

McClure'• Memorandum ~mo the Director 1 HBA, dated 31 DeceDiber 1953. 

Par. 2 .. NOWbere in the Report does the Stu.Cly Group ~tee 

4 to 12 weeks warning. The •te.telll'nt the General reteraToii ih 

the : ,. on .....,.. 21 I \ 

"Thia :potentiality can be f'ull¥ l'O&liited on)¥ vith 

an increase in the current level ot ettort ...... n 

Thia reters to the J?otentia.,li ties <Jr cce.smr &Dd 4S\lB:!'!1AteeS 

nothins· 

Par. 3 ... Tbe St~ Q:roup •a use or the term "Soviet," taken 

in the mrroweet sense / could be mislead1ng ... pa.rticule.rly in the 

Sumne.r,y on paae 2. 

Par. Ji. ... Here the General. ia in be.aic agHemnt vith the intent 

or the stutcy- Grou;p in regard to tha high-level cr)'ptog:nwhic ayatems. 

Par. 5 ... Here the General'• renarke Hem defensive, and eeem to 

'be baled only cm the atatementa on pe:r1onnel contained in the 

~· 'll18 Study Qrou;p'a content1ona in the body ot the report and in the .Appendix, reter especially to research,, deve1opment 

and analytic RSA c1v:U1an pereonnei. Aa tu aa the military are 

ccmcenied, tho point at nak1ng caaNT a rewarding and aat1•41?13 

S!!:!!f llff?lll to have been missed (avoided't). 

I. T. McDONAID 1/Lt~, USAF 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

- ---~~----- ---~-~----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

JEFFREY ANDERSON

PETITION OF: SHANNON MCDONALD :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 117 EM 2018

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of January , 201 9

, in consideration of the Application for

Leave to Withdraw, this matter is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County for that court to determine whether Jeffrey Anderson’s present

counsel should be permitted to withdraw.

If present coun sel is permitted to withdraw, the court is DIRECTED to resolve any

issues relative to Jeffrey Anderson being appointed counsel or granted leave to proceed

pro se

.

The Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County is DIRECTED to enter its

order regarding t his remand within 60 days and to promptly notify this Court of its

determination.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,584,038              11,062,198
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          8,871,133               3,405,293
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,455,171              14,467,491
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     244,457                 433,195
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,210,714              14,034,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,455,171              14,467,491
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              329,853               (681,370)
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           292,197                 782,522
<COMMISSIONS>                                  348,042               1,198,690
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,369,247               (469,897)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,369,247               (469,897)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,369,247               (469,897)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    13.12                  (2.83)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    13.12                  (2.83)
        

</TABLE>
Capitol Building 

Room 241-South 

300 SW 1Oth Street 

Topeka, KS 66612 

Mr. Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region VII 

90 1 North 5111 Street 

Kansas City, KS 66101 

Dear Mr. Brooks: 

Office of the Governor 

June 13, 2011 

phone: 785-296-3232 

fax: 785-368-8788 

governor@ks.gov 

Sam Brownback, Governor 

In June 20 I 0, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the primary National Ambient Air Quality 

Standard (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide (S02) (75 FR 35520). The process for designations following promulgation of new 

or revised NAAQS is contained in Section 107(d)(l) of the Clean Air Act (Act). This section of the Act provides a 

process for the Governor to recommend attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable designations, with appropriate 

boundaries, to EPA and requires that these recommendations be submitted to EPA within one year of promulgation of a 

new or revised NAAQS. This letter is intended to fulfill this obligation for the State of Kansas. 

In the preamble to the NAAQS rulemaking and in a March 24, 2011 , EPA guidance memorandum from Stephen D. Page, 

Area Designations/or the 2010 Revised Primary Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards, EPA describes 

the expected designations process. EPA's final designations are expected to be based on 2008-2010 air quality data 

reported from existing S02 monitors and on any refined modeling conducted by the states specifically for initial area 

designations. EPA's planned designation approach is as follows: 

• Any area that has either monitoring data or refined modeling results showing a violation would be designated 

"nonattainment." 

• Any area that has both mo-nitoring and refined modeling results showing no violations would be designated 

"attainment." 

• All other areas initially would be designated "unclassifiable." 

• County would be the presumptive nonattainment boundary unless the state demonstrates otherwise m 

recommendations to EPA. 

EPA states in its guidance memorandum, "Given the currently limited network of S02 monitors and our expectation that 

states will not yet have completed appropriate modeling of all significant S02 sources, we anticipate that most areas of the 

country will be designated 'unclassifiable."' 
2010 !-Hour Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS Designation 

Page 2 of2 

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has evaluated sources of S02 but has not completed modeling at this 

time. Because there are no existing S02 monitors that violate the revised standard, I recommend that EPA designate each 

of the I 05 counties in Kansas as "unclassifiable" with respect to the revised S02 standard. 

Please feel free to contact John Mitchell, Director of the Division of Environment, at 785-296-153 5 or 

jmitchell@kdheks.gov if you have any questions regarding this designation recommendation. 

Sincerely, 

Governor of the State of Kansas 

c: Robert Moser, MD, Secretary, KDHE 

John Mitchell, Director, Division of Environment 

Rick Brunetti, Director, Bureau of Air
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));      and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of, and for, the periods presented in the  Report. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |   |            |                               |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|-----------------|------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: February      5, 2010 |   |  By:  |  /s/      William W. Priest   |   |
|                             |   |            | William      W. Priest             |   |
|                             |   |            | Chief      Executive Officer       |   |
|                             |   |            | (Principal      Executive Officer) |   |

|                        |   |            |                                              |   |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:      February 5, 2010 |   |  By:  |  /s/      Adam Borak                         |   |
|                        |   |            | Adam      Borak                                   |   |
|                        |   |            | Chief      Financial Officer                      |   |
|                        |   |            | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

----
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23(b)



                      REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS ON
                          FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE


To the Board of Directors of
CITATION Computer Systems, Inc.



Our audits of the consolidated financial statements referred to in our report
dated May 11, 1998, except for Note 20 which is as of June 24, 1998, appearing
on page 27 of the Financial Information Insert to the 1998 Annual Report to
Shareholders of CITATION Computer Systems, Inc. (which report and consolidated
financial statements are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-KSB) also included an audit of the Financial Statement Schedule included in
this Form 10-KSB. In our opinion, this Financial Statement Schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in
conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements.





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

St. Louis, Missouri
May 11, 1998
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”) that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Global Leadership Institute, Inc., formerly known as Cephas Holding Corp., (CIK No. 0001061169) (“Global”), because Global is delinquent in its periodic filings, having not filed any periodic reports since it filed a Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 on March 21, 2014, which reported a net loss of $753,092 for the prior nine months. Global is a Delaware corporation located in Ann Arbor, Michigan with a class of securities registered with the Commission pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). The company's stock has experienced a recent substantial increase in both price and trading volume. The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of Global.

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Exchange Act, that trading in the securities of Global Leadership Institute, Inc. is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on March 11, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 24, 2015.

By the Commission.

Lynn M. Powalski,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-05891 Filed 3-11-15; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY

SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Overland
Storage, Inc. (the Company), that, to the best of his knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 28, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial
statements included in such report.

Dated: September 9, 2009



|       |  |                        
|------ |  | -----------------------
|       |  | /s/    ERIC L. KELLY   
|Name:  |  | Eric L. Kelly          
|Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer

Dated: September 9, 2009



|       |  |                                                     
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|       |  | /s/    KURT L.
KALBFLEISCH                          
|Name:  |  | Kurt L. Kalbfleisch                                 
|Title: |  | Vice President of Finance and ChiefFinancial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Overland Storage, Inc. and will be retained by Overland Storage, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
• ID :A362546.L. 0 "< t( ~ 1D • REF 

otl1oe ot th• ad.et Signal at1'1oer 

Sianal 5•cwi.'7 Dlvild.on 

u. s. Pa~ Ot!ioe .Action 

. Lepl D!Yild.oa 

~ ~ I_.. cf!_. J~) 

( ;t 

)C J4<> 

6 March 1944 

72416 

F~ her.with ia a cOlllWlioat.ion b-oa the u. s. Pat.en\ ottia. 

dated 29 F•bnlarT 1944• Since the p&tftt awJJ,oation _. pl&Qld undW 

the three l'G&r rule pronaiona ot JS u.s.c. J7, an eaencbent will not 

beOOll8 du.a in this caae until 29 February 1947. 

l Inal 

~ dd 29 Feb W,. 

Conal.d K. Lippinoot.t 

L1eu\enant COlonel, Sipal COrpa 

Patent. & !nv~ona Coan.el, Lepl. !4"11.11.on 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
ex1014form8k072811.htm






  





  











  








PROMISSORY NOTE








	
Pocatello, Idaho

	
Amount: $25,000

















FOR VALUE RECEIVED, TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC., an Idaho corporation of 1651 Alvin Ricken Drive, Pocatello, ID  83201 (“Maker”), promises to pay to the order of DAVID AND ANTOINETTE HEMPSTEAD of Idaho Falls, Idaho (“Payee”) the principal sum of $25,000.00, with interest accruing thereon as described below.








	
1.  

	
The loan will have 0% interest if repaid within sixty (60) days of receipt of funds by the Maker.  If the loan is not repaid within sixty (60) days of receipt of funds by the Maker, the Maker will be charged 10% to compensate the Payee for fees associated with securing the loan funds.













	
2.  

	
If the loan is repaid within one year of receipt of funds by the Maker, no annual interest rate will be charged.  If the loan is not repaid within one year of receipt of funds, the annual interest rate will be 6% starting at the one-year anniversary date of the loan.













	
3.  

	
The Payee is authorized to convert part or all of the loan balance and accrued interest to common stock of the Maker at fair market value at any time.













	
4.  

	
The loan’s due date for full repayment is December 31, 2014.












This Promissory Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Idaho.







In the event this Note is placed with an attorney for collection or enforcement of any of its terms or provisions, whether or not suit is filed, the undersigned promises to pay, in addition to costs provided by statute or rule a reasonable attorney’s fee.







Payment of this Note is unsecured.







DATED this 28th day of July, 2011.







TETRIDYN SOLUTIONS, INC.







By:  /s/ David W. Hempstead


David W. Hempstead, President












By:  /s/ Antoinette Knapp


Antoinette Knapp, Secretary
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 16, 2016

NO. 03-16-00201-CV

Melissa Fontenette-Mitchell, Appellant

v.

Cinemark USA, Inc. d/b/a Discount Cinema 8, Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on February 25, 2016. Having 

reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error 

in the trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The 

appellant shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.