alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.34




                                  Certification
                  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                  Act of 2002 with Respect to the North Valley
                      Bancorp Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
                    for the Quarter ended September 30, 2002



         Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections
(a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each
of the undersigned officers of North Valley Bancorp, a California corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

         1.   The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
              September 30, 2002 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the
              requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
              Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2.   Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company.





Dated:  November 13, 2002                          /s/ MICHAEL J. CUSHMAN
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Michael J. Cushman
                                                   President and Chief
                                                   Executive Officer
                                                   (Principal Executive Officer)



Dated:  November 13, 2002                          /s/ EDWARD J. CZAJKA
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Edward J. Czajka
                                                   Executive Vice President
                                                   and Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)


                                       25
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 14822 A Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 4156

Mr. Richard D. Lucas

- MacGibbon R1 Flight Operations, LLC aka R 1, LLC Flight Operations

3540 West Sahara Avenue, #640 Las Vegas, NV 89102−5816

Dear Mr. Lucas

- MacGibbon :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated April 22, 2016 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of R1 Flight Operations, LLC aka R 1, LLC Flight Operations (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for an amendment to your curren t exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and
( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),
91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You requested an amendment to change the company name from R1, LLC

- Flight Operations to R1 Flight Operations, LLC aka R1, LLC Flight Operations

. 1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary o f the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft and operations . At this time, the FAA is unable to act on these

request s . When the FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 14822 remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is granted an amendment t o change the operator name

.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, R1 Flight Operations, LLC aka R1, LLC Flight Operations is hereafter referred to as the operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption

No. 14822 remain in effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on February 28, 2018 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 24.2
                                                                    ------------

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY
                                -----------------


         KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby
constitutes and appoints each of Wade H. Nichols III, Robert K. Kretzman,
Lawrence E. Kreider and Glenn P. Dickes or any of them, each acting alone, his
true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for
him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with
the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the "Corporation") Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (the "Form 10-K") under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of
the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the
Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract,
document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments
thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in
connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities
self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each
acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and
thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to
all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 8th
day of March,1999.


                                       /s/ DONALD G. DRAPKIN
                                       ------------------------------
                                           DONALD G. DRAPKIN
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         This  schedule   contains  summary   information   extracted  from  the
         Consolidated   Balance   Sheet  as  of  September   26,  1999  and  the
         Consolidated   Statement  of  Operations  for  the  fiscal  year  ended
         September  26, 1999 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to
         such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                       890096
<NAME>                                      Uniroyal Technology Corporation
<MULTIPLIER>                                1,000

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           Sep-26-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              Sep-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                Sep-26-1999
<CASH>                                        4,182
<SECURITIES>                                      0
<RECEIVABLES>                                23,307
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (238)
<INVENTORY>                                  38,627
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             73,812
<PP&E>                                      139,511
<DEPRECIATION>                              (46,391)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              213,201
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        53,518
<BONDS>                                     108,921
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
<PREFERRED>                                       0
<COMMON>                                        147
<OTHER-SE>                                   30,986
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                213,201
<SALES>                                     201,433
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            202,998
<CGS>                                       147,047
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               190,162
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             43,115
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 73
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            9,352
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               3,484
<INCOME-TAX>                                    155
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           5,520
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
<CHANGES>                                         0
<NET-INCOME>                                  5,520
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.42



</TABLE>
t.. - • 

~ I 

; . - \ ! 

----·- ----~ --

. . ... 

ar. •uu. .... a. Ge~ 

....... t•pub.(tr.t 

Waaliigti:.n, r. c. 

JJtar •• Ooodu•..n.• 

REF ID :A6708~~ 

. - ., ~ 

l"u UMllti•e41 receSpt •• reeal't'tld •" tilh .ls•~ u•i!:Md .. 

l' 1• J'iHlU•lt~ tt&t. tlli• ~r.t \m •1'.ned •~ ret.121"~:.. L.o 

l b•l 

.... 1pt tor ,.eb&• I lltS&f 

.&. IIllOY 

CJdet, lttauri\1 ~l•1•1oa 

pproved for Release by NSA on 

4-16-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-12-00229-CV

IN RE KODIAK PRODUCTS CO., 

INC.

RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 ON REHEARING

------------

On July 9, 2010, this court issued a memorandum opinion denying relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus as moot. Relator filed a motion for rehearing. 

After due consideration, we deny Relator’s motion but withdraw our prior 

memorandum opinion and substitute the following in its place.

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. The issues presented therein, as they 

relate to relator’s misappropriation of trade secrets, civil theft, and conversion 

claims, have become moot by virtue of the trial court’s July 2, 2012 Order 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
2

Granting Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. As to relator’s 

remaining claim for unfair competition, the court is also of the opinion that relief 

should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

The stay of the trial court proceedings in cause number 236-252084-11, 

styled Kodiak Products Co., Inc. v. Charles H. Deegear, Jr. and Deemaxx 

Components, Inc., pending in the 236th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas, 

is hereby lifted.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: August 2, 2012
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2222 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to lower the standard for removing 

employees who disclose tax return information without authorization, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 24, 2021 

Mr. BRAUN (for himself and Mr. CRUZ) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to lower the standard 

for removing employees who disclose tax return information without authorization, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Taxpayers’ 

5 Privacy Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2222 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF PENALTY FOR UNAUTHORIZED DIS2 CLOSURE OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 7213(a) 

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strik5 ing ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$250,000’’. 

6 (b) DISCLOSURES BY TAX RETURN PREPARERS.— 

7 Subsection (a) of section 7216 of the Internal Revenue 

8 Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000 ($100,000 

9 in the case of a disclosure or use to which section 6713(b) 

10 applies)’’ and inserting ‘‘$250,000’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to disclosures made on or after 

13 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

14 SEC. 3. REMOVAL. 

15 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 7701(c)(1)(A) of title 5, 

16 United States Code, is amended by inserting ‘‘or in the 

17 case of an action involving a removal from the service for 

18 an alleged violation of section 7213(a)(1) of the Internal 

19 Revenue Code of 1986,’’ after ‘‘described in section 

20 4303,’’. 

21 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—The amendments 

22 made by subsection (a) may not be construed to permit 

23 an officer or employee of the United States to submit an 

24 appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board if that indi25 vidual is dismissed from office or discharged from employVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:25 Jul 02, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2222.IS S2222

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2222 IS

1 ment upon conviction for a violation of section 7213(a)(1) 

2 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

    As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of
our reports included in this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K, into
the Company's previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos.
033-75934, 333-04280, 333-08047 and 333-75339) and Form S-3 (File Nos.
333-05939, 333-37921, 333-87157 and 333-94859).

                                          /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
August 14, 2000
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00303-CV

In the Interest of D.C. and G.M., 

Children

§

§

§

§

From the 323rd District Court

of Tarrant County (323-101576-15)

November 17, 2016

Per Curiam

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>

</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0000353191
<NAME>                        North Valley Bancorp
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                  1
<CASH>                                      14,047
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         221
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             1,200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 28,324
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      25,507
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                        26,417
<LOANS>                                    231,591
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,809
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             326,037
<DEPOSITS>                                 285,202
<SHORT-TERM>                                     0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,536
<LONG-TERM>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                    10,439
<OTHER-SE>                                  25,860
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             326,037
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,842
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            3,249
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            18,091
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           6,929
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,929
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       11,162
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  780
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              23
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              9,331
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,047
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   5,047
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,634
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .98
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .97
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                5.19
<LOANS-NON>                                     45
<LOANS-PAST>                                   168
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             2,260
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  313
<RECOVERIES>                                    82
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,809
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                              0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          0


</TABLE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the Corporation) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Form 10-K) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K
or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 4th day of March, 2008.



/S/ ALAN S. BERNIKOWALAN S. BERNIKOW






---
REF ID:A66567 

Colonel *• ii. Bessell, Jr., USA 

Beal ot Departmaat. at MathaaaUce, :oW>N-A 

Unita:l .3tnecs MWt.u;r A.cad.GIQ' 

'?es~ t'oint.1 Hew York 

Dear CQJ.oml Snaall: 

!nu long veaic-aad ~ deUve17 or 717~ letter of 19 Februa.17, 

and aince I am acn..ialed t.o lean ~n at. U. end o£ tb.1a week, 

tor a~ut. lO dlQ'S taapc.rary dut.y dmn ~ut.h, I !lutea to Jet off \bis 

br1e1' repl7. 

Your auggeatt.on t.bat. thEt lecture oe given on the mrnJ.ng oi 

28 Mq and be repeated on W1e Eollo111.ng .marning idll.• I think, - J.es:a 

+-&King an. me am better tor tna second audieme. 

Iour a.sBUllptlon t..~t. it. 1l'1ll be best. tor YQ\l to axcl.ude mm-OSt\ 

st.udent.a and t"aaalv Dftbers, as wall aa tacult..," nembars• vi.Vea is 

correct. However .. ! :mve in t.hi.:l =ormec't.ion one s~Uan t.o otter. 

Last. 'j81JZ1 when 1 .,pc a olus1.f1ed lec"b4'o at t.he Air l.in1Y8"i'Q', 

I learnal that t.he td. ves o.t £acul.ty :nambera am student Qfricers vero 

amd.ous ~ near some one talk on cert.ain 1ntGl'est.i:ig Q:laligh'&a ot the 

subject. or cr:roto~. ! ot'f'erCJi to iiw t.~ a talk an tbe sorts ~ 

CryrJtogra?h>' CO"IOl1q Cft"t1].oyed i:>y t..1039 ~eculiar ptll'SOD8 WO try to 

pmve, b;y those JIKlllZlll, that. :JOmeone other than '.jhakea~ vrote t.ne 

f.mmGrtal pla)'B. ~ offer va.'1 accepted and ! gave tbe talk in the late 

afternoon. !t. was, I JftB1' sa,y, Y6%':f wll l'C81va:l1 the a•rdieace leamed 

S0118th1ng ~•a..".11, !\ad a. good U• doing so - and 30 did Itt :Sere, too, 

I asst la."'\'t.am sl:tdn. 

iillll.1 then. 1t th.at. llGl"t -:>.! t-alk ""'1ld be ot interest.. I would be 

glad to ,give one at tile M:adGIV' • 1:1 ei t.bor ~ lato attel"DOGll or evoa:Jng 

o£ 28 K• - am. to set. 1mr :a1nci at reat., at. no !'1nanc1al coat. t.o 

AQ.YbadJ'. 

Tbere is no neat to mentJ.GD tbi9 •ezt.N-cv.rricialar" talk in Yr:fU 

of'.f1c:l.al let.tier to Omenl Canine asldng ~or • to &iVe t..-. lacture 

betoN t.i. ?h1l'd Cl.Ma. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A17A0522. ELSIE BRIDGES v. AMERICAN HOMES 4 RENT PROPERTIES

EIGHT LLC.

On July 28, 2016, we granted defendant Elsie Bridges’ application for

discretionary review of the superior court’s dismissal of her appeal from the

magistrate court’s order issuing a writ of possession.

1 Our July 28 order notified

Bridgesthatshe had ten days from the date of the order to file a notice of appeal. See

OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). Sixty-two days later, on September 28, 2016, Bridges filed her

notice of appeal. We lack jurisdiction.

The timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement to confer

jurisdiction on this Court. White v. White, 188 Ga. App. 556, 556 (373 SE2d 824)

(1988). Because Bridges failed to file her notice of appeal within ten days of our

order granting her application, her notice of appeal is untimely. Accordingly, this

appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g);

White, 188 Ga. App. at 557.

We note that Bridgesisrepresented by attorney Grady A. Roberts, III, who has

represented numerous dispossessory clients before this Court and who is well aware

of the jurisdictional deadlines for filing appeals. In light of Roberts’ repeated prior

untimely filings in this Court, he cannot reasonably have been mistaken as to our

deadlines. Given that Georgia Rule of Professional Conduct 1.3 requires lawyers to

“act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client,” we hereby

1 Bridgesinitially filed her application in the Supreme Court, which transferred

the case to this Court.

November 08, 2016
DIRECT the Clerk of Court to transmit a copy of this order to the Office of the

General Counsel of the State Bar of Georgia.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/08/2016