Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules 13309 

their use to process transactions 

involving Banca Privada d’Andorra. At 

a minimum, that special due diligence 

must include: 

(A) Notifying those foreign 

correspondent account holders that the 

covered financial institution knows or 

has reason to know provide services to 

Banca Privada d’Andorra that such 

correspondents may not provide Banca 

Privada d’Andorra with access to the 

correspondent account maintained at 

the covered financial institution; and 

(B) Taking reasonable steps to identify 

any use of its foreign correspondent 

accounts by Banca Privada d’Andorra, 

to the extent that such use can be 

determined from transactional records 

maintained in the covered financial 

institution’s normal course of business. 

(ii) A covered financial institution 

shall take a risk-based approach when 

deciding what, if any, other due 

diligence measures it reasonably must 

adopt to guard against the use of its 

foreign correspondent accounts to 

process transactions involving Banca 

Privada d’Andorra. 

(iii) A covered financial institution 

that obtains knowledge that a foreign 

correspondent account may be being 

used to process transactions involving 

Banca Privada d’Andorra shall take all 

appropriate steps to further investigate 

and prevent such access, including the 

notification of its correspondent account 

holder under paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) and, 

where necessary, termination of the 

correspondent account. 

(3) Recordkeeping and reporting. (i) A 

covered financial institution is required 

to document its compliance with the 

notice requirement set forth in 

paragraph (b)(2)(i)(A) of this section. 

(ii) Nothing in this paragraph (b) shall 

require a covered financial institution to 

report any information not otherwise 

required to be reported by law or 

regulation. 

Dated: March 6, 2015. 

Jennifer Shasky Calvery, 

Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05724 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–2–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 165 

[Docket Number USCG–2014–1044] 

RIN 1625–AA00 

Safety Zone; Shore (Belt) Parkway 

Bridge Construction, Mill Basin; 

Brooklyn, NY 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

establish a safety zone on the navigable 

waters of Mill Basin surrounding the 

Belt Parkway Bridge. In response to a 

planned Belt Parkway Bridge 

construction project, this rule would 

allow the Coast Guard to prohibit all 

vessel traffic through the safety zone 

during bridge replacement operations, 

both planned and unforeseen, that could 

pose an imminent hazard to persons and 

vessels operating in the area. This rule 

is necessary to provide for the safety of 

life in the vicinity of the construction of 

the Belt Parkway Bridge. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must be received by the Coast Guard on 

or before May 12, 2015. 

Requests for public meetings must be 

received by the Coast Guard on or before 

April 3, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number using any 

one of the following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket 

Management Facility (M–30), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries 

accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except federal 

holidays. The telephone number is 

(202)366–9329. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for further instructions on 

submitting comments. To avoid 

duplication, please use only one of 

these three methods. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this rule, contact 

LT Hannah Eko, Coast Guard Sector 

New York; telephone (718) 354–4114, or 

email hannah.o.eko@uscg.mil. If you 

have questions on viewing or submitting 

material to the docket, call Cheryl 

Collins, Program Manager, Docket 

Operations, telephone (202) 366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

A. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

1. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

rulemaking, indicate the specific section 

of this document to which each 

comment applies, and provide a reason 

for each suggestion or recommendation. 

You may submit your comments and 

material online at http://

www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online, it will be considered 

received by the Coast Guard when you 

successfully transmit the comment. If 

you fax, hand deliver, or mail your 

comment, it will be considered as 

having been received by the Coast 

Guard when it is received at the Docket 

Management Facility. We recommend 

that you include your name and a 

mailing address, an email address, or a 

telephone number in the body of your 

document so that we can contact you if 

we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number [USCG–2014–1044] in 

the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on ‘‘Submit a 

Comment’’ on the line associated with 

this rulemaking. 

If you submit your comments by mail 

or hand delivery, submit them in an 

unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 

11 inches, suitable for copying and 

electronic filing. If you submit 

comments by mail and would like to 

know that they reached the Facility, 

please enclose a stamped, self-addressed 

postcard or envelope. We will consider 

all comments and material received 

during the comment period and may 

change the rule based on your 

comments. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
13310 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

2. Viewing Comments and Documents 

To view comments, as well as 

documents mentioned in this preamble 

as being available in the docket, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, type the 

docket number (USCG–2014–1044) in 

the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click 

‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket 

Folder on the line associated with this 

rulemaking. You may also visit the 

Docket Management Facility in Room 

W12–140 on the ground floor of the 

Department of Transportation West 

Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. 

3. Privacy Act 

Anyone can search the electronic 

form of comments received into any of 

our dockets by the name of the 

individual submitting the comment (or 

signing the comment, if submitted on 

behalf of an association, business, labor 

union, etc.). You may review a Privacy 

Act notice regarding our public dockets 

in the January 17, 2008, issue of the 

Federal Register (73 FR 3316). 

4. Public meeting 

We do not now plan to hold a public 

meeting. But you may submit a request 

for one, using one of the methods 

specified under ADDRESSES. Please 

explain why you believe a public 

meeting would be beneficial. If we 

determine that one would aid this 

rulemaking, we will hold one at a time 

and place announced by a later notice 

in the Federal Register. 

B. Regulatory History and Information 

A Coast Guard Public Notice detailing 

work on the portion of the Belt Parkway 

Bridge over Mill Basin was published 

on 31 July 2007. 

C. Basis and Purpose 

The legal basis for this rule is 33 

U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 

3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 

1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 

0170.1, which collectively authorize the 

Coast Guard to define regulatory safety 

zones. 

The purpose of this rulemaking is to 

ensure the safety of vessels and workers 

from hazards associated with 

construction on the Belt Parkway 

Bridge. 

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule 

The proposed rule will give the 

Captain of the Port (COTP) New York 

the authority to prohibit vessel traffic on 

this portion of Mill Basin when 

necessary for the safety of vessels and 

workers during construction work in the 

channel. The Coast Guard will close the 

designated area to all traffic during any 

circumstance, planned or unforeseen, 

that poses an imminent threat to 

waterway users or construction 

operations in the area. Complete 

waterway closures will be minimized to 

that period absolutely necessary and 

made with as much advanced notice as 

possible. During closures there will not 

be enough space for mariners to transit 

through the safety zone between the 

construction vessels and the current 

bridge piers. 

The COTP would notify the public of 

the enforcement of this safety zone by 

publishing a Notice of Enforcement 

(NOE) in the Federal Register and via 

the other means listed in 33 CFR 165.7. 

Such notifications would include the 

date and times of enforcement, along 

with any pre-determined conditions of 

entry. 

A navigation safety situation created 

by construction of the new Belt Parkway 

Bridge and removal of the current Belt 

Parkway Bridge prompted the proposed 

rule. This bridge carries the Shore 

Parkway (also referred to as the Belt 

Parkway) over Mill Basin. The current 

Belt Parkway Bridge was built in 1940 

and no longer meets current federal and 

state safety standards. The New York 

City Department of Transportation (NYC 

DOT) will hire contractors to construct 

a new fixed bridge approximately 100 

feet west of the current bridge and 

remove the current movable, bascule 

bridge. This new bridge will represent 

an increase of about 1,780 feet in length 

over the existing bridge and an increase 

of about 46 feet in width. Construction 

is scheduled to begin mid to late 2015. 

Scheduled completion of the new bridge 

and removal of the old bridge is 2021. 

The Coast Guard has discussed this 

project with NYC DOT to determine 

whether the project can be completed 

without channel closures and, if 

possible, what impact that would have 

on the project timeline. Through these 

discussions, it became clear that while 

the majority of construction activities 

during the span of this project would 

not require waterways closures, there 

are certain tasks that can only be 

completed in the channel and will 

require closing the waterway. 

E. Regulatory Analyses 

We developed this proposed rule after 

considering numerous statutes and 

executive orders related to rulemaking. 

Below we summarize our analyses 

based on these statutes and executive 

orders. 

1. Regulatory Planning and Review 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action under section 3(f) of 

Executive Order 12866, Regulatory 

Planning and Review, as supplemented 

by Executive Order 13563, Improving 

Regulation and Regulatory Review, and 

does not require an assessment of 

potential costs and benefits under 

section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 

or under section 1 of Executive Order 

13563. The Office of Management and 

Budget has not reviewed it under those 

Orders. 

The Coast Guard expects the 

economic impact of this proposed rule 

to be minimal as this proposed safety 

zone will be limited to the Mill Basin 

area, closures will mostly occur during 

weekdays when traffic is low, and most 

waterway closures will be during times 

of reduced recreational boating traffic. 

Advanced public notifications would 

also be made to local mariners through 

appropriate means, which may include 

but are not limited to the Local Notice 

to Mariners and at http://

homeport.uscg.mil/newyork which 

would allow the public an opportunity 

to plan for these closures. 

2. Impact on Small Entities 

The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 

(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, 

requires federal agencies to consider the 

potential impact of regulations on small 

entities during rulemaking. The term 

‘‘small entities’’ comprises small 

businesses, not-for-profit organizations 

that are independently owned and 

operated and are not dominant in their 

fields, and governmental jurisdictions 

with populations of less than 50,000. 

For all of the reasons discussed in the 

REGULATORY PLANNING AND 

REVIEW section, the Coast Guard 

certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 

proposed rule will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities. 

If you think that your business, 

organization, or governmental 

jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity 

and that this rule would have a 

significant economic impact on it, 

please submit a comment (see 

ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it 

qualifies and how and to what degree 

this rule would economically affect it. 

3. Assistance for Small Entities 

Under section 213(a) of the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), 

we want to assist small entities in 

understanding this proposed rule. If the 

rule would affect your small business, 

organization, or governmental 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules 13311 

jurisdiction and you have questions 

concerning its provisions or options for 

compliance, please contact the person 

listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will 

not retaliate against small entities that 

question or complain about this 

proposed rule or any policy or action of 

the Coast Guard. 

4. Collection of Information 

This proposed rule will not call for a 

new collection of information under the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501–3520.). 

5. Federalism 

A rule has implications for federalism 

under Executive Order 13132, 

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct 

effect on the States, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the States, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government. We have 

analyzed this proposed rule under that 

Order and determined that this rule 

does not have implications for 

federalism. 

6. Protest Activities 

The Coast Guard respects the First 

Amendment rights of protesters. 

Protesters are asked to contact the 

person listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

coordinate protest activities so that your 

message can be received without 

jeopardizing the safety or security of 

people, places or vessels. 

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires 

Federal agencies to assess the effects of 

their discretionary regulatory actions. In 

particular, the Act addresses actions 

that may result in the expenditure by a 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

an expenditure, we do discuss the 

effects of this rule elsewhere in this 

preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children From 

Environmental Health Risks 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This proposed 

rule involves the establishment of a 

safety zone and thus, is categorically 

excluded from further review under 

paragraph 34(g) of Figure 2–1 of the 

Commandant Instruction. A preliminary 

environmental analysis checklist 

supporting this determination and a 

Categorical Exclusion Determination 

will be available in the docket where 

indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek 

any comments or information that may 

lead to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation 

(water), Reporting and record keeping 

requirements, Security measures and 

Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION 

AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREA 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C 1231; 46 U.S.C 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add § 165.T01–1044 to read as 

follows: 

§ 165.T01–1044 Safety Zone; Belt Parkway 

Bridge Construction, Mill Basin, Brooklyn, 

NY. 

(a) Location. The following area is a 

safety zone: All waters from surface to 

bottom of Mill Basin within 200 yards 

of the Belt Parkway Mill Basin bridge, 

east of a line drawn from 40–36–24.29′′ 

N, 73–54–02.59′′ W to 40–36–11.36′′ N, 

073–54–04.69′′ W, and west of a line 

drawn from 40–36–21.13′′ N, 073–53– 

47.38′′ W to 40–36–11.59′′ N, 073–53– 

48.88′′ W. 

(b) Definitions. The following 

definitions apply to this section: 

(1) Designated Representative. A 

‘‘designated representative’’ is any Coast 

Guard commissioned, warrant or petty 

officer of the U.S. Coast Guard who has 

been designated by the Captain of the 

Port (COTP) New York, to act on his or 

her behalf. The designated 

representative may be on an official 

patrol vessel or may be on shore and 

will communicate with vessels via 

VHF–FM radio or loudhailer. In 

addition, members of the Coast Guard 

Auxiliary may be present to inform 

vessel operators of this regulation. 

(2) Official Patrol Vessels. Official 

patrol vessels may consist of any Coast 

Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, state, or 

local law enforcement vessels assigned 

or approved by the COTP. 

(c) Enforcement Periods. (1) This 

safety zone is in effect permanently 1 

June 2015 but will only be enforced 

when deemed necessary by the COTP. 

(2) The COTP will notify the public of 

the enforcement of this safety zone by 

publishing a Notice of Enforcement 

(NOE) in the Federal Register and via 

the other means listed in 33 CFR 165.7. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
13312 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 49 / Friday, March 13, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

Such notifications will include the date 

and times of enforcement, along with 

any pre-determined conditions of entry. 

(d) Regulations. (1) The general 

regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23, 

as well as the following regulations, 

apply. 

(2) During periods of enforcement, all 

persons and vessels must comply with 

all orders and directions from the COTP 

or a COTP’s designated representative. 

(3) During periods of enforcement, 

upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard 

vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or 

other means, the operator of the vessel 

must proceed as directed. 

Dated: March 3, 2015. 

G. Loebl, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port New York. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05800 Filed 3–12–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R04–OAR–2014–0795; FRL–9924–28- 

Region 4] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; North Carolina 

Infrastructure Requirements for the 

2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient 

Air Quality Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve 

portions of the November 2, 2012, State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submission, 

provided by the North Carolina 

Department of Environment and Natural 

Resources (NC DENR), Division of Air 

Quality (NCDAQ) for inclusion into the 

North Carolina SIP. This proposal 

pertains to the Clean Air Act (CAA or 

the Act) infrastructure requirements for 

the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient 

air quality standards (NAAQS). The 

CAA requires that each state adopt and 

submit a SIP for the implementation, 

maintenance, and enforcement of each 

NAAQS promulgated by EPA, which is 

commonly referred to as an 

‘‘infrastructure’’ SIP. NCDAQ certified 

that the North Carolina SIP contains 

provisions that ensure the 2008 8-hour 

ozone NAAQS is implemented, 

enforced, and maintained in North 

Carolina (hereafter referred to as an 

‘‘infrastructure SIP submission’’). With 

the exception of provisions pertaining to 

prevention of significant deterioration 

(PSD) permitting, interstate transport, 

and state boards requirements, EPA is 

proposing to approve North Carolina’s 

infrastructure SIP submission provided 

to EPA on November 2, 2012, as 

satisfying the required infrastructure 

elements for the 2008 8-hour ozone 

NAAQS. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before April 3, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– 

OAR–2014–0795, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: R4–ARMS@epa.gov. 

3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 

4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2014– 

0795,’’ Air Regulatory Management 

Section, (formerly the Regulatory 

Development Section), Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, (formerly the 

Air Planning Branch)Air, Pesticides and 

Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 

5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Lynorae 

Benjamin, Chief, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Regional Office’s normal hours of 

operation. The Regional Office’s official 

hours of business are Monday through 

Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding 

Federal holidays. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2014– 

0795. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email, 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. For additional information 

about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA 

Docket Center homepage at http://

www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy at the Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA 

requests that if at all possible, you 

contact the person listed in the FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to 

schedule your inspection. The Regional 

Office’s official hours of business are 

Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 

4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Nacosta C. Ward, Air Regulatory 

Management Section, Air Planning and 

Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides 

and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW., 

Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The 

telephone number is (404) 562–9140. 

Ms. Ward can be reached via electronic 

mail at ward.nacosta@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Background 

II. What elements are required under sections 

110(a)(1) and (2)? 

III. What is EPA’s approach to the review of 

infrastructure SIP submissions? 

IV. What is EPA’s analysis of how North 

Carolina addressed the elements of 

sections 110(a)(1) and (2) 

‘‘infrastructure’’ provisions? 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS