alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
· M~ll 

Div,;• 53 Room 

• 

253 REF..._*D ~- Paper No.:,. 3,._ .• . 

" _, 

,. 

. .;, .A.ddres11 onl11 • The Commissioner or Patents, 

and not Diil' olBcial by name • 

- - AU commDJ1leatlons respectJng thiS 

DEPARTME~F COMMERCE.. 8 3· ""'~shoaldgiretJretierlalnam,,.,,.. I'" t - l:J~te or filing, and name er UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE , - _ •. tho applicant -

RICHMOND 20, VIRGINIA -· 

Please find below a communication from the EXAMINER in 

charge of this application. ({) _ ~ . . . . ......... __ .. _., 

GPO 1~1&-3 ~Comml.uianer of Pal.enb. Applioan"t: William F. Friedman 

William D. Hall 

e/o Chief Signal Of.f~cer 

Pentar;on Bldg. Washington,. D.c .• 

Hebern 

Scherbius 

Korn 

Morris 

.Friedman 

Friedman 

References: 

'.-·-·· .. --····-· 

Ser. No. 551,172 

Filed Aug. 25 • 1944 

For AUTHENT IOATIMG DEVIJ E 

Sept. 4, 19.28 

JJay 11. 1926 

Dec. 5~ 19,;5 

Apr. 3. 1934 

1:ay J.8,. 1937 

Dec. 13, 193$ 

35;;4 

n 

rt 

n 

II 

An illustration or the mechanical set-up of the "device 

is required, provided or oourse new !!latter is not introduced. 

•ere electrical diagrams are not considered su:f£1cient. The clair.-.s: 

are all rejected as based on an inadequate disclosure. 

Claim 2 is rejected as .failing to define the invention 

properly in the "meansu of' lines 7a:nd 8. In these lines "signit'ica.nce of energization" is not und~ratood. I:f ~his means that 

the user nay think of "9" for example as meaning one thinf-i at one 

occasion of use. as for example a date and at another an amount 

of money this is or ho patentable consequence. since like the 

same number used on an ordinary typewriter.or hand written it 

can mean whatever the user wants it to mean. .Jt "ceans for varying 

.. 

the sisnif'1oance" is a stateme~t or £unction or purpose and whateger 

"varying tho significati.ontt may mean the structure is not suf'f'1c1ently 

set out 1n th'1Purpose d1ac1osed. ~he alainl is.there.fore .rurtller 

rejected. 

Claim 5 is rejected as indefinite in line 2 "ol' the like" 

and is therefore rejected. 

Claims 1-5 all set out a. series of' switches and th.en 

another switch. Just what essential difi'erence there is between any 

o:f' the switches of s series and another switch is not seen. The 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
,.· 

I .... • e Serial No. 551,172 

cle.1ms are re jccted on Reborn in which the la.st swit,eh in the 

casca~e is "another switch" and the preceding switches are 

the nser1es". 

TYie claims are all directed to a device of' the oharacter 

described and this is deac:r1be'1 as beln;; an authenticator. In 

what respect an authenticator differs from an_ ordinary 

arytographic means such as Hebernts is not stated and since 

Hebernfa device oou1d be used for such a purpose the claims 

are again rejected as failing to define proper+y and as 

unpatentable over Hebern,. and also as un,Jatentuble over any 

of the other devices cited. 

Examiner .. 
REF ID:A367433 --..... 

I 

I 

I l[!fJ ' \ 

~ 91 1( /112. 

c , 7 0 4 1 6 9 2.. 

------------------------~{}"' 

FIGURE 2. FIGURE 

II 

I 

11111. 

i ~ ...• " II
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-2193 

ROBERT JOHN SCHIEBLE, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

NEVILLE LORICK, President, SCE&G; JENKINS,

Manager, Summerville Office, SCE&G; H. RICHARD

ROSEBROCH, County Council Chairman for

Dorchester County; JAMES JACKSON; RANDY GREEN,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

SCE&G,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District

Judge. (CA-02-1400-2-12)

Submitted: January 29, 2004 Decided: February 4, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Robert John Schieble, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John A. Massalon,

WILLS & MASSALON, Charleston, South Carolina; M. Dawes Cooke,

Peter G. Nistad, BARNWELL, WHALEY, PATTERSON & HELMS, L.L.C.,

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Robert John Schieble, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (2000) complaint

without prejudice. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s order was entered on the docket on

August 19, 2003. The notice of appeal was filed on September 19,

2003. Because Schieble failed to file a timely notice of appeal or

to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley D. Slye, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|             |                                                        
|------------ | -------------------------------------------------------
|             |                                                        
|May 15, 2006 | /s/ Bradley D. Slye                                    
|             | Bradley D. Slye                                        
|             | Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

---
Order entered November 22, 2017

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00577-CV

NIXDORF GMBH & CO. KG AND WATERCREST PARTNERS, L.P., Appellants

V.

TRA MIDLAND PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 191st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-06190

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ November 20, 2017 unopposed motion to extend time to 

file a brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief filed on or before December 20, 

2017. 

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32



Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of LightPath Technologies,
Inc. (the Company) does hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge, that:



1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Dated: August 25, 2004 |  | /s/    KENNETH
BRIZEL                  
|                       |  | Kenneth Brizel, Chief Executive Officer
|                       | 
|Dated: August 25, 2004 |  | /s/    MONTY K.
ALLEN                  
|                       |  | Monty K. Allen, Chief Financial Officer



The certifications set
forth above are being furnished as an exhibit to the Report solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signatures
that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Allbritton Communications Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Robert L. Allbritton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                            /s/ Robert L. Allbritton
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Robert L. Allbritton
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer


December 12, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Discovery Oil, Ltd. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2010.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of I/O Magic Corporation because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2011.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Maydao Corporation because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2011.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of NX Global, Inc because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended October 31, 2011.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of SensiVida Medical Technologies, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended May 31, 2011.

The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on March 4, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 17, 2015.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-05371 Filed 3-4-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
.,.. ....... 7! 

REF ID:A72265 I I 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605tl 

·EO 3.3(h)(2) • 

A&-20 AS-1~ 19 Apr 48 Bequest tor 01•••1t1ed Inatruct1t>D 

Books (continued) 

'·I...____ _ _.......___~- 2. In r•g&rd to rurn1eb1ng the :Rav7 v'1th the •ter1al 

:

I_ ·:;e•t:d t:r :""'• :n:no:T/or turning over the d .. ·ocUIM9nta to 1.he the aourae indicated •in Par. 2 or 

o on iael eveoe varrao.te4 and 11hould/ be attiraed •·• a 

seneral polic7"tor the guidance of AS-70. 

3.Thia case again ahova turtber need f'or prqlipt action leac·.1ng 

to the eatabliabnlent ot ABCRECC. In the aeantiae 1t le reco111mended ~bat AS-70 be requeated to contact the Bavy 1.ntor1m1ll7 v1th a 

•1ev-toward aacerta1n1ng, 1t poem1ble, Yb&t Bav7 projects ari 

UDderwa1 or &l'e eontemu>lated iu the c1phony and citax tielda. 

'fhia ma,- br 1ng to light I t 1nteree t and •7 be 

belpt'ul to the ASA 1n preventing wseleae or unprofitable dupl1- oat1on or ertort. 

WILLIAM P. PBlBJ>JWt 

Chier, Communications Research 

. Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

2 

, 

'>. 

-~ --.... 
) v I 

REF ID:A722. 

LI8'1' or COMPANIXS 

Inclosure 3 

PL 86-36/50 USC 360 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 
- - - - - - - . -----1 ....... ._ .... ~.,, ~~..;..!.J.:-.o . .r1~ ···Jwi.!! 

REF ID:A72265 

86-36/50 USC 360 

EO 3.3(h)(2) ~ 

I 

2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE THREE FISCAL QUARTERS ENDED OCTOBER 2, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                          39,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  444,273
<ALLOWANCES>                                    27,343
<INVENTORY>                                    894,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,567,479
<PP&E>                                       1,584,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                 739,012
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,453,387
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,249,263
<BONDS>                                      1,192,260
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        97,091
<OTHER-SE>                                     435,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,453,387
<SALES>                                     11,057,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,057,800
<CGS>                                        9,965,771
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,967,547
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                18,213
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             127,240
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (14,275)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (40,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (40,925)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)


</TABLE>
. - ~ 

A-II- .j 7 ~ _ _,_ 71 =-=- • ,If' l .. ....,...-....( ~ J ~ (.,.-1., ,{_,t - ,.._L •~--'~ 

.01 6~RRIER ~EET HQ A. 

MUST REMAIN WITH ATIACHED PAPERS 

NUMBER EACH MEMO OR REPLY IN LEFT BORDER PLACE NAME, RANK AND 

,,.., I.. - TELEPHONE NUMBER BOTIOM OF EACH ACTION ORA W LINE UNDER EACH ACTION 

.r11~ ENTER FILE CLASSIFICATION ADJUTANT----

!'Ba1Ja .AS-80 

TO 

are 

2. 

meat ar 

AS-4 

AS-85 

FROM 

Thru: AS-40 

AS-20 

I , I 

i 

I 

DATE SUBJECT 

Storage Space 

elephone convenation ot 11 February 1947 between llr. K. 

t 18 requested tbat lfamtenume Branch, Seaur!:t;i' D1T1111on, 

11u.i~M.1K T 3Q2 ae a storage •iace. Buildinga T 303 and T' .304 

amtemnce Branah. 

aec! on the tact that two carload.a ot unolaas!fied equip-

,nrnll.J"V 194 '1. 

-~· Chiet, llainten&IJce B1'8.11Ch 

~CHER /' 

Colonel, Signal ~s Deputy Chief, Army Security Agency 

17 Feb ~ Building T-302 is assigned to Maintenance Branch, 

Security Division, effective this date. 

WDGAS Form No 1078 PAGE NO ---

26 Nov 45 38900 LIFT HERE USE OTHER SIDE 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-03-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352al..Z ~ ~ 7
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1842. ODUM v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.

This case was docketed by this Court on June 1, 2016, and appellant’s brief and

enumerations of error were due June 21, 2016. In addition, this Court entered an order

on June 22, 2016 ordering the appellant “to file an enumeration of errors and a brief

in this case no later than July 5, 2016” and advising the appellant that the “[f]ailure

to comply with this order, absent an extension upon motion for good cause shown,”

would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. As of the date of

this order, the appellant has not filed a brief and enumeration of errors and did not

request an extension of time in which to do so. 

Accordingly, this appeal is hereby DISMISSED as abandoned pursuant to

Court of Appeals Rules 13 and 23 (a). 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/18/2016

November 18, 2016
SCPW-16-0000677

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

 

CHRISTOPHER LEE SLAVICK, Petitioner,

vs.

HALAWA CORRECTIONAL FACILITY ET AL., Respondents. 

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Christopher Lee

Slavick’s motion for reconsideration, filed on November 7, 2016,

and the record,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion for

reconsideration is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, November 16, 2016.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-16-0000677

16-NOV-2016

10:21 AM
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 4, 2016

No. 04-16-00351-CV

IN THE ESTATE OF JESUS N. NAVARRO III, DECEASED,

From the Probate Court No 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-PC-1902

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On August 29, 2016, this Court suspended the appellate deadlines in this case pending 

briefing on the issue whether this Court holds jurisdiction. This Court reviewed the parties’ 

briefs on the jurisdictional issue and determines this Court holds jurisdiction. The probate 

court’s Order Setting Apart Exempt Property Before Approval of Inventory disposed of all 

property listed in Appellant’s application filed pursuant to Texas Estates Code Section 353.051. 

Therefore, the order is final and appealable because it disposes of all parties or issues in a 

particular phase of the probate proceedings. See In Re Estate of Ulbrich, 04-12-00514-CV, 2014 

WL 129599, at *8 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Jan. 15, 2014, no pet.)(citing De Ayala v. Mackie,

193 S.W.3d 575, 578 (Tex. 2006)). This Court has received the clerk’s record, supplemental 

clerk’s records and reporter’s record. 

It is therefore ORDERED that this appeal is reinstated on the docket of this court. 

Appellant’s brief shall be filed within 30 days of the date of this order. 

_________________________________

Jason Pulliam, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 4th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Tommy
Hilfiger Corporation Consolidated Balance Sheet as of March 31, 1998 and
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year then ended and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                        $157,051
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,732
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    150,947
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               438,284
<PP&E>                                         160,089
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 618,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,398
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           376
<OTHER-SE>                                     518,686
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   618,010
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               847,110
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  447,524
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               230,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                168,770
<INCOME-TAX>                                    55,590
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   113,180
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.99
        

</TABLE>