alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2157 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a criminal penalty for 

operating drones in certain locations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2015 

Mrs. BOXER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide a criminal 

penalty for operating drones in certain locations, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safety for Airports 

5 and Firefighters by Ensuring Drones Refrain from Ob6 structing Necessary Equipment Act of 2015’’ or the 

7 ‘‘SAFE DRONE Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2157 IS

1 SEC. 2. CRIMINAL PENALTY FOR OPERATING DRONES IN 

2 CERTAIN LOCATIONS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 2 of title 18, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘§ 40A. Operating drones in certain locations 

7 ‘‘(a) OFFENSE.—Whoever knowingly operates a 

8 drone in a restricted area shall be fined under this title, 

9 imprisoned not more than 1 year, or both. 

10 ‘‘(b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

11 operations conducted for purposes of firefighting or emer12 gency response by a Federal, State, or local unit of govern13 ment (including any individual conducting such operations 

14 pursuant to a contract or other agreement entered into 

15 with the unit). 

16 ‘‘(c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

17 ‘‘(1) the term ‘drone’ has the meaning given the 

18 term ‘unmanned aircraft’ in section 331 of the FAA 

19 Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (49 U.S.C. 

20 40101 note); 

21 ‘‘(2) the terms ‘large hub airport’, ‘medium hub 

22 airport’, and ‘small hub airport’ have the meanings 

23 given those terms in section 47102 of title 49; and 

24 ‘‘(3) the term ‘restricted area’ means— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2157 IS

1 ‘‘(A) within a 2-mile radius of a small hub 

2 airport, medium hub airport, or large hub air3 port; 

4 ‘‘(B) within 2 miles of the outermost pe5 rimeter of an ongoing firefighting operation in6 volving the Department of Agriculture or the 

7 Department of the Interior; or 

8 ‘‘(C) in an area that is subject to a tem9 porary flight restriction issued by the Adminis10 trator of the Federal Aviation Administration.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

12 at the beginning of chapter 2 of title 18, United States 

13 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new 

14 item: 

‘‘40A. Operating drones in certain locations.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          46,569
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               162,250
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                 5,071
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    734,010
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,251
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,182
<LOANS>                                        913,919
<ALLOWANCE>                                     19,945
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,896,855
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,630,378
<SHORT-TERM>                                    35,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             39,354
<LONG-TERM>                                     54,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        60,026
<OTHER-SE>                                      78,058
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,896,855
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 22,443
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,312
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     3
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                35,758
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,600
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,092
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           19,666
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  9,277
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,628
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      17,628
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,848
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.94
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.56
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,178
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 7,173
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                19,808
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       20
<RECOVERIES>                                       157
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,945
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,945
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<Page>

EXHIBIT 99.2

  CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO RULE 13(a)-14(a).

I, Richard Bear, certify that:

1. I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 40-F of ID Biomedical Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of Registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.


Dated:  March 31, 2005

                                       By: /s/ Richard Bear
                                           -------------------------------------
                                       Name:         Richard Bear
                                       Title:        Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 12

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES    (Dollars in Thousands)

Year Ended2010

2009

2008

2007

2006Income from continuing operations

$
45,521

$
44,135

$
42,967

$
47,803

$
45,360Add: Fixed charges


2,844


2,714


4,421


5,300


7,371Less: Capitalized interest


(117
)

(40
)

(60
)




Less: Income allocated to non-controlling interests


(191
)

(296
)

(307
)

(343
)

(343
)Earnings

$
48,057

$
46,513

$
47,021

$
52,760

$
52,388Fixed ChargesInterest expense (includes amortization of debt issue costs and capitalized interest)


2,653


2,418


4,114


4,957


7,028Income allocated to non-controlling interests


191


296


307


343


343Total fixed charges


2,844


2,714


4,421


5,300


7,371Preferred stock dividend


13,662


15,141


15,390


16,923


17,157Total fixed charges and preferred dividends

$
16,506

$
17,855

$
19,811

$
22,223

$
24,528Ratio of earnings to fixed charges


16.90


17.14


10.64


9.95


7.11Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends


2.91


2.61


2.37


2.37


2.14


---



RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGESInstructions to S-K Item 503(d)
Definition as of February 2, 2011

Calculation of Fixed Charges

Sum
of the following:
        Interest expense and capitalized
        Amortized premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness
        An estimate of the interest within rental expense
        Preference security dividend requirement of consolidated subsidiaries

Calculation of Earnings

Pre-tax
income from continuing operations before adjustment for income or loss from equity investees

Add:
Fixed charges
Add: Amortization of capitalized interest
Add: Distributed income of equity investees
Add: Company's share of pre-tax losses of equity investees for which charges arising from guarantees
          are included in fixed charges
Sub: interest capitalized
Sub: preference security dividend requirements of consolidated subsidiaries
Sub: non-controlling interest in pre-tax income of subsidiaries that have not incurred fixed charges



Definition of Preference Security Dividend



Definition of Equity Investees



---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05974]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
National Advisory Council for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and/or contract proposals 
and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or 
commercial property such as patentable material, and personal 
information concerning individuals associated with the grant 
applications and/or contract proposals, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Council for Biomedical 
Imaging and Bioengineering.
    Date: May 18, 2015.
    Open: 9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.
    Agenda: Report from the Institute Director, other Institute 
Staff, scientific presentations, and presentations of task force 
reports.
    Place: The William F. Bolger Center, Franklin Building, 
Classroom 1, 9600 Newbridge Drive, Potomac, MD 20854.
    Closed: 1:30 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications and/or 
proposals.
    Place: The William F. Bolger Center, Franklin Building, 
Classroom 1, 9600 Newbridge Drive, Potomac, MD 20854.
    Contact Person: Jill Heemskerk, Ph.D., Executive Secretary, 
Office of Research Administration, National Institute of Biomedical 
Imaging and Bioengineering, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Room 239, 
Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nibib1.nih.gov/about/NACBIB/NACBIB.htm, where an 
agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be posted 
when available.

    Dated: March 11, 2015.
David Clary,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-05974 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Abatement Order filed April 9, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00093-CV

IN RE TRACEY BISHOP, Relator

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

311th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2003-55818

ABATEMENT ORDER

On February 5, 2014, relator Tracey Bishop filed an amended petition for 

writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. 

App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this Court to compel the judge of 311th 

District Court of Harris County to vacate multiple orders in a suit affecting the 

parent-child relationship. Relator also filed a motion for temporary relief, asking 

this Court to stay all proceedings in the underlying litigation pending this Court’s 

disposition of her petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.10. This 
2

Court denied relator’s motion for temporary relief on March 12, 2014. Relator’s 

petition for writ of mandamus, however, remains pending with this Court, and this 

Court requested a response to relator’s petition from the real party in interest and 

amicus attorney.

At the time relator filed her amended petition for writ of mandamus, the 

Honorable Denise Pratt was serving in the capacity as presiding judge of the 311th 

District Court. Judge Pratt resigned her office effective March 28, 2014. By rule, 

we must abate this original proceeding to permit respondent’s successor to 

reconsider the orders challenged in relator’s petition. See Tex. R. App. P. 7.2(b); 

see also In re Baylor Med. Ctr. at Garland, 280 S.W.3d 227, 228 (Tex. 2008) 

(orig. proceeding) (“Mandamus will not issue against a new judge for what a 

former one did.”). 

Therefore, without expressing any opinion on the merits of relator’s petition, 

we abate this proceeding, treat it as a closed case, and remove it from the Court’s 

active docket. This original proceeding will be reinstated on this Court’s active 

docket at such time when respondent’s successor advises this Court of the action 

taken upon reconsideration of the orders challenged by relator. This Court also will 

consider an appropriate motion filed by either party to reinstate or dismiss this 

original proceeding, as appropriate. 

We further direct relator to advise this Court of the status of the underlying 

litigation every thirty (30) days from the date of this order until the trial court has 

informed this Court of the action taken upon reconsideration of the orders 

challenged by relator. 
3

It is so ORDERED. 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Wise.
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2061 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure coverage of 

mental health services furnished through telehealth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2021 

Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Ms. SMITH, Mr. CARDIN, and Mr. THUNE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure 

coverage of mental health services furnished through telehealth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Telemental Health 

5 Care Access Act of 2021’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENSURING COVERAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERV7 ICES FURNISHED THROUGH TELEHEALTH. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1834(m)(7) of the Social 

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(7)) is amended— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2061 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘subject to 

2 subparagraph (B),’’; 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The geo4 graphic’’ and inserting ‘‘The geographic’’; and 

5 (3) by striking subparagraph (B). 

6 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

7 subsection (a) shall take effect as if included in the enact8 ment of section 123 of division CC of the Consolidated 

9 Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116–260). 

10 SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT ON UTILIZATION OF MENTAL 

11 HEALTH SERVICES FURNISHED THROUGH 

12 TELEHEALTH. 

13 Not later than 1 year after the first day after the 

14 end of the emergency period described in section 

15 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

16 1320b–5(g)(1)(B)), the Secretary of Health and Human 

17 Services shall submit to Congress a report on the utiliza18 tion of mental health services furnished through telehealth 

19 under section 1834(m)(7) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 

20 1395m(m)(7)), that includes any recommendations of the 

21 Secretary regarding— 

22 (1) fraud or abuse prevention with respect to 

23 such services; and 

24 (2) additional funding that the Office of Inspec25 tor General of the Department of Health and 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2061 IS

1 Human Services may require for purposes of con2 ducting audits, investigations, and other oversight 

3 and enforcement activities with respect to the fur4 nishing of such services. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
"' ,.../ _.; 1'1DFDJl>lDA:rAI5if 1 .. 

Off ice of the Chief of the Afr <=C'Orps 

Washington 

Memorandum for 

- ·,;,.·.-;:-r--: ... ~,. 5 8 % 3 '-/ ~ . . I"'".,; -... ;_,·".'. -

I . . - . -

~ 

3'/- ~o~ (~ 

~-)-~ 

t•~~ 

CHAS. A. ROWE 

Patents Section, S. C. 
- ~ - ·- .. 

53 Room 

.Addre65 onl11 

"The ConunlSliioner of Patllntfo, 

Wamhfngtoa, D. C.," 

11nd not un7 official by n::mo 

a 

689~" .. i ' 

k-itPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

WASHINGTON 

Please find below a communication from the EXAMINER in 

Paper No. 17 ; All rommunleatlous re11peelin11 ihl• 

\.....- ; applleatlon •ho11ld Ki•e the Sec"i•I number, ,., • da '" of nuna. and name of rr the applicant 

chcrge of this application. ({) ~ 

... ll-S623 . ~Commiuloncto/PatcnU. Applioantfl1ll1am P •. Friedman et al 

• H •. Vanderwerker & C.A •. Rowe, 

c/o Chief of the Air Corps, Munitions Building, Waahington, D. c. 

Ser. No . Filed 

For 

588,344 

Jan •. 23, 1932 

Cryptographic System 

Responsive to amendment filed Feb. 26, 1935• 

Claims 3•17, 19•23, 25•32, and 34•50 are in the case. 

Claims 3•17, 19•23, 25•,2, ;4-39 appear allowable. 

The following decisions corroborative or Foreman and 

Sweetland are added to the record: 

Smith, 449 O. G. 762 

Ernst et al., li49 o. a. 511 

Wataon• 402 o. G. ~ 

Jacobuai 1923 c. D. 99 

Dixon, 90b c. D. 242 

Fessenden, 1916 c. D. 172 

!£ external and internal are applicable to applicants' 

method it is solely because of some structural featUl'es and claims 

having these tenns do not avoid the rejection ba..sed on Sweetland 

and Foreman and confirmed by the above noted decisions •. 

Since no new ground of rejection is advanced, ·C,laima 40-50 

are finally rejected as unpatentable under the decisions or record. 

Examiner. 

. '~.
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned constitutes and appoints J. James Gaynor and Dorothy
Cipolla, and each of them, his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, and any and all amendments thereto and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact
and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises as fully to all intents and purposes as might or could be done in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or either of them, or their substitute or substitutes may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been signed on this 29th day of September 2008 by the following persons.



|                   |  |  |  |                       
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------
|/s/ Robert Ripp    |  |  |  | /s/ J. James Gaynor   
|Robert Ripp        |  |  |  | J. James Gaynor       
|                   |  | 
|/s/ Sohail Khan    |  |  |  | /s/ Robert Bruggeworth
|Sohail Khan        |  |  |  | Robert Bruggeworth    
|                   |  | 
|/s/ Steve Brueck   |  |  |  | /s/ Louis Leeburg     
|Steve Brueck       |  |  |  | Louis Leeburg         
|                   |  | 
|/s/ Gary Silverman |  |  |  |                       
|Gary Silverman     |  |  |  |
LIGHTPATH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 10-K/A

Exhibit 23.2

 ** **

 

Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

LightPathTechnologies, Inc.

Orlando,Florida

Wehereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos.333-23515, 333-23511, 333-41705, 333-92017, 333-121389, 333-121385, 333-96083, 333-50976, 333-50974, 333-155044, 333-188482, 333-201871and 333-201872) and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-113814, 333-37443, 333-39641, 333-47905, 333-86185,333-93179, 333-94303, 333-31014, 333-37622, 333-47992, 333-51474, 333-75528, 333-127053, 333-133772, 333-146550, 333-153743, 333-159603,333-162342, 333-163416, 333-166633 and 333-182240) of LightPath Technologies, Inc. of our report dated September 22, 2015,relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated byreference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended.

 

 

BDOUSA, LLP

Orlando,Florida

December17, 2015