alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_,. ~ -- a. ,_ .. . ~ ~ s'l'AHDAROl'ORMN0.84 ~ ,.....-, '~m~q.Ei66-]q --,-, ~ - ""'16 Ila.: - - - -..--... ..a.. ~r .. I 

'.~ Office Memorandum . UNITED sTATEs-G-avERNMENT 

. , ~ 

TO Mr. friedI:la.n, .AFSA-00':::' DATE: J.6 Nov 51 

FROM l·ir. Rowlott, .AFSJ\-021' 

SUBJECT: Infor:friation you requeateC, re Application for Paton!; Sil 188, 546, Ha.gelin 

Since the proposal is a possible lm.prove:oent in wiC,ely-used Hacolin 

l'rinciIJlos of key-wheel and d.ru.m interaction end. since its e.C.o:ption 

vob.ld invalid.ate those techniques now used to salvo ma.chines of this 

kiri.ii, it i;8 fel.t that the interests of Lhis Agency require that subject disclosure be helct f'ro::::i. tl10 world :market as lone as possible • 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-10-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

,-.,. --- .......... - ... --~ 

-- - - --- Jl. 

-~.. . .. ..
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE SECOND QUARTER 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
TO SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           5,921
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,274,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,119,741
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,894,166
<PP&E>                                       5,665,377
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,238,938
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,428,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,879,266
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,878
<COMMON>                                     3,796,302
<OTHER-SE>                                   (834,503)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,428,513
<SALES>                                      9,796,858
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,796,858
<CGS>                                        7,849,452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                7,849,452
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,851,051
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             293,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,908
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (22,246)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             34,156
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    34,156
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03
        


</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-16-00621-CV

Gilbert Lee DAVIS,

Appellant

v.

GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 7, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 367896

Honorable Scott Roberts, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 16, 2016

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Appellant Gilbert Davis appeals from the trial court’s default judgment entered March 14, 

2012. The record does not reflect a bill of review has been filed. In addition, it appears the statute 

of limitations to file a bill of review has expired. For these reasons, it does not appear that this 

court has jurisdiction over this appeal. 

Therefore, on October 20, 2016, this court ordered Davis to show cause in writing within 

fifteen days of the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of 

jurisdiction. Davis responded requesting that this court retain this appeal; however, he did not 
04-16-00621-CV

- 2 -

provide basis for this court’s jurisdiction. In light of the record presented, appellant has no right 

of appeal, and this court must dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal 

is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). 

PER CURIAM
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 24, 2011 

Order 

 

August 24, 2011 

142438-9(65) 

DELAINA PATTERSON, as Personal 

Representative for the Estate of Sherrill Turner, 

Deceased, and Robert Turner, a Minor, Individually, 

by his Next Friend, DELAINA PATTERSON, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 SC: 142438-9 

v COA: 288375, 291287 

Wayne CC: 08-111034-NO 

SHERRY NICHOLS, 

Defendant, 

and 

TERRI SUTTON, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, the motion by defendant-appellant for extension of 

the time for filing her brief and appendix is considered and it is granted.
---

|Delaware                                       | 0-22790              | 42-1410788                        
|---------------------------------------------- | -------------------- | ----------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (CommissionFile No.) | (IRS EmployerIdentificationNumber)

|519 Sixth Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa       | 50309-2473
|---------------------------------------- | ----------
|(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code)

---

---

---

ITEM  5.  OTHER EVENTS.

On February 14, 2001, the Registrant issued the press release attached hereto as Exhibit 99.

ITEM  7.  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS.

(c)	Exhibits:

Exhibit 99 - Press Release dated February 14, 2001

---



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

| | **STATEFED FINANCIAL CORPORATION**
| | ----------------------------------

|Date:     March 2, 2001 | By:   /s/ Andra K. Black       Andra K. Black, Co-President and CFO
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------

---



|Exhibit No. | Description                          
|----------- | -------------------------------------
|99          | Press Release dated February 14, 2001
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.26

                                 Promissory Note

$6,315.00                                                       January 15, 2002

        For value received, the undersigned promises to pay to Novadigm, Inc., a
Delaware corporation (the "Company"), or order, at its principal office the
principal sum of $6,315.00 with simple interest thereon at the rate of 2.73% on
the unpaid balance of the principal sum. Said principal and interest shall be
due on October 17, 2002.

        This Note is secured by a pledge of the Company's common stock under the
terms of a Security Agreement dated January 15, 2001 and is subject to all the
provisions thereof.

        The holder of this Note shall have full recourse against the
undersigned, and shall not be required to proceed against the collateral
securing this Note in the event of default.

        In the event the undersigned shall cease to be an employee of the
Company for any reason, this Note shall, at the option of the Company, be
accelerated, and the whole unpaid balance on this Note of principal and accrued
interest shall be immediately due and payable.

        Principal and interest shall be payable in lawful money of the United
States of America. THE PRIVILEGE IS RESERVED TO PREPAY ANY PORTION OF THE NOTE
AT ANY TIME.

        Should suit be commenced to collect this Note or any portion thereof,
such sum as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys'
fees. The maker waives presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest and
notice of non-payment of this Note.

                                        /s/ Robert Anderson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Robert Anderson
S. 2143 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To provide for the authority for the successors and assigns of the Starr-Camargo 

Bridge Company to maintain and operate a toll bridge across the Rio Grande 

near Rio Grande City, Texas, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STARR-CAMARGO BRIDGE. 

Public Law 87–532 (76 Stat. 153) is amended— 

(1) in the first section, in subsection (a)(2)— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘, and its successors and assigns,’’ 

after ‘‘State of Texas’’; 

(B) by inserting ‘‘consisting of not more than 14 lanes’’ 

after ‘‘approaches thereto’’; and 

(C) by striking ‘‘and for a period of sixty-six years 

from the date of completion of such bridge,’’; 

(2) in section 2, by inserting ‘‘and its successors and 

assigns,’’ after ‘‘companies’’; 

(3) by redesignating sections 3, 4, and 5 as sections 4, 

5, and 6, respectively; 

(4) by inserting after section 2 the following: 

‘‘SEC. 3. RIGHTS OF STARR-CAMARGO BRIDGE COMPANY AND SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. 

‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Starr-Camargo Bridge Company and 

its successors and assigns shall have the rights and privileges 

granted to the B and P Bridge Company and its successors and 

assigns under section 2 of the Act of May 1, 1928 (45 Stat. 471, 

chapter 466). 

‘‘(b) REQUIREMENT.—In exercising the rights and privileges 

granted under subsection (a), the Starr-Camargo Bridge Company 

and its successors and assigns shall act in accordance with— 

‘‘(1) just compensation requirements; 

‘‘(2) public proceeding requirements; and 

‘‘(3) any other requirements applicable to the exercise of 

the rights referred to in subsection (a) under the laws of the 

State of Texas.’’; and 

(5) in section 4 (as redesignated by paragraph (3))— 

(A) by inserting ‘‘and its successors and assigns,’’ after 

‘‘such company’’; 

(B) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘public agency,’’; 

(C) by inserting ‘‘or to a corporation,’’ after ‘‘international bridge authority or commission,’’; and 
S. 2143—2 

(D) by striking ‘‘authority, or commission’’ each place 

it appears and inserting ‘‘authority, commission, or corporation’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

SHARON K. KLEIN, Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, Respondent

______________________

2021

- 1770

______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF

- 0831

- 20

- 0177 -I- 2.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

B RIDGET A. M OORHEAD
, Selman Breitman LLP, San Diego, CA, argued for petitioner.

S ONIA W. M URPHY
, Civil Division, Commercial Litigation Branch, U nited States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by
R EGINALD T HOMAS B LADES
, J R
., B RIAN M. B OYNTON
, P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is Case: 21-1770 Document: 67 Page: 1 Filed: 04/11/2022O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (L OURIE
, B RYSON
, and P ROST
, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed

. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

April 11, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court Case: 21-1770 Document: 67 Page: 2 Filed: 04/11/2022
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6864
JAMES HENRY BURLEY, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-1000-7) Submitted: November 6, 2003 Decided: November 18, 2003 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Henry Burley, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen R. McCullough, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James Henry Burley seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, , 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1040 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and di smiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
' \ 

" 

.. -___ .. --· -- .. ·--

FRO!!: 

ro: 

--'D .1\ ..... : 

• REF ID:A72620 

AP.LI1'tG roi:; !-!:..LL ~ l'J .. l'I Oi~ 

I83Jl!.1.~E C:Si-.L::..::l 

.AL:OI·; E!.iB..~ . .iY I.O~UJOl~ 

L:ILID ~,A.SH 

Date filed 

ri.:ne tiled 

4867 

l!.'1.Y 25 1 194~ 

1200Z 

TOD-~Y J1.T B;;mrt;Lt.-Y s L.=\lET F.ia.D n·:~'l\"IE" J..~ EIS LOCA1'IC1J \';Im 

A~!D }.S~D !.!Al~ C':iESTIOiiS L~sr or "".EICH I ~!!) OR CCUI.D 110'1' 

-~ .t' ·.,. ~ ":: ,1 ,... W "'- I - I -

Dote cc::plei;eC. Tic~ co.1.pl eted 

.LTT:-:;- .. ~-..:r·-.-. C":" ••• -- ~ 

............. ~ ..... T .I. .r..!.. ~u.c.r ::O?Y CF lii:S :::J5~GE I.S FCR3I.D~r: 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuant to E.O. 13s2a a·-f "I I 

•. 

I ' 

. : 

L ' ., 

.. 

[. . . 

I • • 

. ·. 

~· ~ 

~ ., .. .. 

l 

- . · . ~ ~ 

.. 

-

= . 

··=~ 

.. :. 

: . .. ·:· 

.. ·: .. -· 

·:.· 

.· ·. 

. ... 

·· ... 

. · 
• REF ID:A72620 

' 

FROl!: .Al!Oii Et.13t~SY I.Ol;DO.?i 

Date filed 

1'1.:n.e t 11 ed 

l'O : l::ILID Wis.SH 

I·;R: 4867 

·-

l:i..r..Y 25 I l 943 i2ooz 

?.:OBILE Al~D FROBABLY Wn.L 'BAVX ABOUT T •• "EJ.'\'lY RECEIVIKG s::'l'e 

EACH Cl.::! .. TEE!' ARE a&"U!;Dro. IC li.L;.VE FIVE 31:0".t.i lil~I1'3 Al!D 

.. 

<" - -

--

AS l~r -&340 

D:: te c·-=c~!!l::'::p~l.-.e~"&~e~d...,.ll..,...:S:-~""t.> ... ,-19-G:3 

Ti.:9 co~ii.:pl eted 21COZ 

·. 

' " 

'II ._. I \": . 

t 

. 

r 

I 

r 

. ··.· . . .... 1•11A•.\ \'; 

: 

. .,,,. .. 

. , : . . .. : 

.. rill. 

'" 

. . .. 

·. . 

... ... •• •.r.:~ 

···: 

: .. ··.· . . ' . -·.: :····: 

.... 

. ··. 

·.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                          11,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,600
<PP&E>                                          29,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  29,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  21,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           65,500
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,000
<OTHER-SE>                                    (94,200)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    21,300
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (8,900)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,900)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,900)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
31.1




SARBANES-OXLEY
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION




I, Robert
O. Knutson, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Wind Energy America Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and




c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.









Date:
            November
      14, 2008
            
            By:
            /s/
      Robert O. KnutsonRobert
      O. KnutsonPrincipal
      Executive Officer and PrincipalFinancial
      Officer
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDE.R 

People of Michigan v Shunta Tcmar Small 

Dock~ o. 328476 

LC o. 14-008713-FH 

Cynthia Diane Stephens 

Presiding Judge 

I Ienry William Saad 

Patrick M. Meter 

Judges 

The Court orders that the October I 0, 2016 opinion is hereby /\MENDED co correct a 

clerical error. The opinion is corrected to read November I 0, 20 16 as the date of the opinion. 

In all other respects, the opinion remains unchanged. 

/\true copy ~nte cd and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

NOV 16 2016 

Date
,•' • REF ID:A66472 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

SUBJECT: Letter of appreciation from 

Air Command and Staff School 

TO: Mr. William F. Friedman, 

Armed Forces Security Agency, 

Washington 25, D. c. 

• IN REPLY REFER TO 

AFSA-1.l./fal 

Serial: 13 3 0 

8 NOV 19&0 

1. I have received a letter of appreciation from Colonel John c. 

Horton, USAF, Deputy Commandant of the :Air Command and Staff School, 

Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, as a result of your recent appearance 

before the students as a guest lecturer from the Armed Forces Security 

Agency. 

2. I take great pleasure in quoting the contents of the letter 

as follows: 

11 1. The Air Command and Staff School desires to express its 

appreciation for the outstanding presentation made by Mr. William 

F. Friedman of your organization to the students of the Air 

Communication and Electronic Staff Officers Course on 29 September 

1950. 

11 2. Mr. Friedman's expert portrayal of the background, 

development and manner of employment of Communications Intelligence 

as a military weapon will undoubtedly have a lasting impression on 

those who were privileged to be present at his lecture. 

113. The Air Command and Staff School is honored to have bad 

Mr. Friedman participate in its educational program and is looking · forward with pleasure to the possibility of having him speak to 

the future classes of the Air Communication and Electronic Staff Officers Course." 

EARL E. STONE 

Rear Admiral, U.S.Navy 

Director, Armed Forces Security Agency 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a