alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<CIK> 0000352162
<NAME> NORTHEAST INSURANCE CO.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        18,930,093
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      29,349
<MORTGAGE>                                     380,000
<REAL-ESTATE>                                  201,583
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              21,342,550
<CASH>                                       2,181,435
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           4,601,825
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         441,937
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              34,541,382
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             20,336,545
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          6,217,088
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     2,992,314
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,415,067
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                34,541,382
<PREMIUMS>                                   5,342,075
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            992,416
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           (170,791)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   3,986,020
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,973,463
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,973,463
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                204,217
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,067
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            200,150
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   200,150
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Amarfio Dejalo Washington, Appellant

No. 06-21-00025-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 188th District Court of 

Gregg County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 50106-

A). Memorandum Opinion delivered by 

Justice Stevens, Chief Justice Morriss and 

Justice Burgess participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Amarfio Dejalo Washington, has adequately indicated his 

inability to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JANUARY 27, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1802 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 53 ) IV-E-4 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 11/4/2008 11:57:59 AM Sheet 53 of 117P. 2

Date : To : From : Subject : Februar

y 24 , 200 0 Ai r an dRadiatio n Docket J A-90-3 7 -Ate w liWioeM J ^Tor h DnscoTl , Integrate dImplementation Group , ITPI D (MD-12 ) Meeting wit

h Senat e Staf f O n Februar y 10 , 2000 , th e EP

A me t wit h majorit y an dminorit y Senat e staf f to discus s curren t ne w sourc e revie w (NSR) refor mactivitie s including recen t stakeholde

r meeting s an

d rulemaking schedules . A copy of th e attende e lis t

i s attached . Attachmen t cc : Pa mSmith , (MD-12 ) Jo n Devine , OG

C

EP A AI R DOCKE TP. 3 

### WWesWLW*^^ 1 

### ; I L

### /Vgrrtrp

2g,TJU 'tf-Mtitrrt

. ; 

### .!^>eAoW c IW^ /
"CAMS V\AiUL&L ros s A*/ 2l^L>%** . / /C*&t«^&, ,pAOV & S0LOTM,0> O ;;;Uo^"p^»^- t 

### !. : nTM * /H-W ^

uJooc ! : • IM * UHU . T^akc TZ>\c2*s)e\[ \ 0/7<3BUvA/^-Viy ^ u> ~&- -A-^ / 

### &A/d4A^ < 

### y^r\aJcs7 {y.Ooocrrsctrs &\Aj/ IMltJ. 1 

### ^ » P/?JAT2 

# ?/4'SV/~Y9

/ 

# 7f 224-"7So l 

# 22</-296? £/> * 

# ePf t e?fr)OCr<- ^PA/OAP<\ 

### Wp<^\.ttu«*v

\

2 - 5^^ - 3& £ ? 

# w-i^/'O^r * £?2'SM-S57f e (Z^.5~W^(£< ^ 2^4-M^S' i
ex47subdebtindenture.htm






Exhibit 4.7







THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.,


ISSUER


and


[                     ],


TRUSTEE







INDENTURE


Dated as of [              ], 201[ ]







Subordinated Debt Securities
99-654.

#### State ex rel. Penn v. Horn.

Cuyahoga App. No. 75697. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due June 7, 1999, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed *sua sponte.*
• 

\_ 

... H. p., CO:rwith 

Yt~ heli.dent 

REF ID:A64421 

vatcrn 

4o Jludaon 

Union 

Stl"Ol)t, 

Telegraph 

Jtoaa A--33 

~ 

lev f ccrk 131 ll'V York 

lieu' Mr. ~thJ 

-nu. vU1 a<:ktxMlede:e vith mD)' than.kM recejpt ot ~ .latter 

·« rt ~ l9~ ao.1. 1ta attachments, ~ to Jtr, William r .. ~; laecutive ~ ~ the 11.tioual. ~1ty lt#/fm<::.f 

~itie ~ bl-d. 

. Vo ... m-.r ~iati~ flt 1'CAJr continued. Utterest ud. co- ~1on 1n ~~with the n&1Qrt outltn1ng the ~stions 

fit. 

~ 

the Western tbion ~ and v.Ul ~ iA • t«»itfon to Jake eucb 

.. - \Ill ~4'iate attel- G ~~ to IJtud¥ the# 

~ta~. 

_ ~r __ l 1-1. 1- lboaJ4 ""'1ti9Q ~ fKtl. ifd'_n ~ ~ .. lit.Ue l@'e~ 6§ the ....w leading• to 'tibe im1.tat1on hil' bi4a 1'ot" - the eattt:nv. p:rocess!.na ~ .. 

itbe Apney does not iteelt' proceras eecurity ~e'1 but JllU,ljt 

~t npo:rta :from the Utve.etiptive agenciea vbo per!'Ol'lll .uch c.bccke 

tor 9ecur-it;t clee.rancea. UutQl"tuue:wly, the ..curity c.l.ea:rwlcee tor 

fill the Weateru tbion pecpl.e 'Who wuld. havo been in.volveii ~ uot 

IMdtable when, because or the timing Y.1.th!n the tuca.l ~, it 

became essential to start the t~ta. tor bid invita.tion and 

t.be:re:!ore be~ of the la¢k at the ~ate clearances, tnvita ... tione to bid could Mt be IUbmitted to tlle Western Union Colipaey. 

tho WQZ'~ ot *'· ~in'• ~nt that tbe Contract Oft.tee 

bo.d betare it three prcposale trora ether t'ir'.a:$ vhieb wro co.oai~ 

f&Uttic~nt ~'With nt'lpeCt. to tho &'V&ila.bility at. that t~ o't »t'OS .. 

~ive contractors~ eleared tQX' thia particular project. ilflo be~ at the great lead. or .ecurit;y ~tipt101'1S ll'e have 

'Men l.irJdted. in <rur abilitiee to ~lleh e. pool ot wit.ab~ el.care~ 

~c:tive ecw.tTO.ctor~ tar our va:rtoua ~ts priox- to the 

m.etenee ot • fl)ecttic contract requirement .. 

l regret the ve.y- 1n 'Wbi~h the 11tuation d.eveiq,ed bUt I l'llU&t 

~1Wa.te ~t certain or tbe -.ctiOil# vhteb led.. to tbe aituu.tion 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

- ____ ----J-
~b¥ hi.vit:ir.ti~ tD bi! eau.14 ~ 'be MOt '\o you ~ ~ the ~l ett 1hia ~· t'~ ~tion d. w..lel'$t.Glld1ns d w.. 

litu!t.t1on ~ 'fltr¥ Jiil.Ch 'l"FOCia~~ 

fal ';mE ~-

.Acknovledging receipt of Mr. Corwith'a 

1.tr dtd ~ Aut 54 'With its a.tta.chloonta 

¢0.Ucernitlg d.evelqpneut of central 

JrOcesaitlg ayf;'tem. ~lana.tion of 

Ncvrity cl.ee.r4.ncea required for 

.Jl ..... e.<:~~-
Exhibit 99.2

                         CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                          18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of J Net
Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Steven L. Korby, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS 1350, as adopted pursuant to SS
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
         or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of
         operations of the Company.

Dated:  February 14, 2003     By:  /s/ Steven L. Korby
                                  _______________________
                                  Steven L. Korby
                                  Chief Financial Officer

     This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company
for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
EXHIBIT 32(b)








CERTIFICATION OF


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarters ending September 30, 2009, 2008, 2007, and 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: June 25, 2010
By:
/s/ John F. FerraroJohn F. FerraroTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer




This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
IN REPLY 

REFE:RTO • WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

February 15, 1936 

8 

l. In connection with a memorandum dated August 31, 1935, (copy 

attached) setting forth "certain facts in connection with the invention 

of several alternative means of providing an aperiodic displacement of 

the substitution cipher Wheels of a cipher machine as granted in claim 

17 of the patent specifications having referenqe to Converter Type 

M-134-'r2," the following additional facts are made of record.a 

a. The principle of employing a set of juxtaposed rotating commutators as a means of selecting in an irregu.lar, aperiodic manner, 

the successive alphabets (for encipherment or decipherment) from among 

a plurality of cipher alphabets is the contribution of Frank B. Rowlett. 

3. The associated principle of controlling the stopping positions 

of a single substitution cipher wheel by a set of juxtaposed control 

cipher wheels is the contribution of William F. Friedman. Notes Thus, 

for example, in Friedman and Graham u. s. Patent No. 2,028,772 the 

cipher key transmitter and its associated mechanism would be replaced 

by a set of control cipher wheels, the 26 final contacts of which 1'10uld 

be connected to pins which would stop the substitution commutator in 

the enciphering {or deciphering) position. 

4. 'l'he idea as to the possibility of directly applying the foregoing principles to the stopping of a rotating printing wheel at cipher 

positions, the latter being superimposed upon the stopping position 

determined by the key depressed on the keyboard, is the equal and joint 

contribution of both William F. Friedman and Frank B. Rowlett. In this 

case, in order to prevent c-umulative errors it is necessary to return 

the printing wheel to an initial position attar each operation. The 

cipher stopping position of the printing wheel is determined a~er it 

has been stopped by the depression or a key or the keyboard. 

<Jt;:uo,4;,.,a; 

William F. Madman. 

~ 

'Witnesses a 

Frank R. Rowlett. 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-30-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§
- - I "! • REF ID:A66466 

UIHTED STATES AIR FORCE 

AIR UNIVERSrrY 

HEADQUART3RS 

AIR COI:tiMAtm AJl!D STAFF SCHCOL 

Electronics Division 

Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama 

l'.\Jl'r. William F. Friedman 

Armed Forces Security Agency 

Washington 25, D. C. 

Dear-}i::r. Friedman:-- -- - -- --- -~~ ~ -· ~ -- ·-

• 

5 F'ebruary 1951 

The ovation you received last Friday morning expressed most 

eloquently, the appreciation of our students and faculty for your 

splendid presentation on "Communications Intelligence11 • However, it 

is ncnor my very warm privilege to tell you officially that the Air 

Command and Staff School is deeply grateful for your outstanding 

contribution to our educational program. Your appearance was, again, 

one of the highlights of our course. 

In closing, may we repeat our sincere hope that it lvill be 

possible to include your lecture as a regular feature in our future 

cour:s9s. 

Kindest personal regards to you and Elizabeth. 

~~z C~~' USAF 

ff JJ~~ 

')l(~ '? 

·~~ ~ 

~-~ef_, zt,- _,_ --

A- f ~· ;el- : 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00432-CV

AUDI AG AND VOLKSWAGON GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.,

Appellant-s

v.

Jesse RIVERA and Kathy Rivera,

Appellee-s

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CI00118

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In this court’s order of July 27, 2016, appellate deadlines in this case were suspended until

November 14, 2016, allowing for a disposition to be filed within (30) days of the date of

mediation. The parties were able to reach a settlement agreement in this cause on or about

November 10, 2016. On November 14, 2016, the parties requested that the deadline suspension

be extended for an additional 45 days from the date of their motion, for the execution of the

mediated settlement agreement to be finalized. No further extensions of time will be considered

or granted without proof of extraordinary circumstances.

The request is granted. Appellate deadlines in this case are hereby suspended until

December 29, 2016. 

It is so ORDERED on November 17, 2016.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

FILE COPY
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

JIMMY KELLY CONTRERAS, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 21-0477 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2004-125536-002

The Honorable Margaret R. Mahoney, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Amanda M. Parker

Counsel for Respondent

Jimmy Kelly Contreras, Florence

Petitioner

FILED 2-15-2022
STATE v. CONTRERAS

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Maria Elena Cruz, Judge Samuel A. Thumma, and Judge 

Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Jimmy Kelly Contreras seeks review of the superior 

court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. This is 

petitioner’s third successive petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction relief.

State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to 

show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition 

for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) 

(petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the petition 

for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of 

discretion.

¶4 We grant review and deny relief.
REF, ID :A522088-

WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON lo•ember 22, 19JJ 

Mr. George A. Grab•, 

Signal Gorps Laboratories, 

Fort filonaouth, lew Jerser. 

Dear Grab•• 

I a enclolllng a copy of a aeaorandua which will be 

ot iata.reet to you. The dec1a1on was aada after aoae dJ.acussicm 

in which I presented the f a.cta ana our interest•. 

Sincarel;r ;yours, 

Encl. 

Copy of leti.r. 

• 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
I_.,. 

r-· SEmf Ef L 

I ··"' .lli --... ' f. - :t 

l!!.!! .. l 

ln Im 

toa C'hiet, D1Yil1o.a at c:r,yptocnPl\Yt DefaRMat et ltsate1 'hllhiagtozs, I>. C. 

l • tile ater1al requested i• t.b• Md• letter aan be ~ppl19d ~1 the 

U., hcur1\J Age•;-• l' l• underatocd. that advanc• not1• •111 be Clft!l 

to t.h1• Ace:DO¥ •• to 1ib• apected 4eliY•ry datea IO the.' produo't1~n ot "811 

•t•rlal ••n 1-• 1Dt•«rat94 •1th .no:r:aal Al'llJ req'Uirat.at• tor •iall•r S.'e::&.•• 

I• t'ke con per ur&tt ot 1teal '\e 'be pntY14ed is a.a tollowaa 

a. Co• per edlilton. Gt 110 1et• at IO at.rlpa eaoh .. aua.11. 

b. Celt per 114.ltion of 1000 •et• ot IO .Vlp• •oh • IN.Tl. 

•· C.0•11 ,.r "o& of O...Tlu U.pe• - la.oo. 

.-~ 

······- - 4-, ... ~I . 

SECRET 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 04-16-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352 

. ,...,,. • "'"fi . -:::-~
REF ID:A105034 Sl"ANDARI> PORM ND. 84 

Office Memorandum . UNITED sTATEs GovERNMENT 

PB.OM 

SUBJECT: 

DATE: \~ ~ 

~. \~--.L ~ r...t ~ 9. ~ o.o-uJ 

~ -j; ~-

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
. MEMO ROUTING SllrCIRCULATE 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION COORDINATION 

2 FILE 

INFORMATION 

3 

SPIC 

4 SEE ME 

SIGINATURE 

REMARKS 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaoea DA AGO Form 81111, 1 A.pr 48, and AFRQ ~o .. w~ .,.0 f FEB liO Form 12, 10 Nov 47, whlob DIA¥ tie ua04. ..-----.~
• REF ID:A66744 • 

(Buio 1\ra lAG1 D/A, ot 18 Deo 1952, 1ubj1 R.R. 5728 "lor b 

Reliet or William r. J'rle4ae•.") 

Seli.ala bo 

KatioDal SecurS.\7 AgeaoJ, l'faahington 25, D. c. 

'1'01 JUdp Achooate Oemftlt Department of the Al"llJ, '!'he Pantaaoa 

1. ~ U. and •teriala and the aid or other acm.rn-.n 

gploJ'ffl wre utUs..t in the drnl.oimd ot llr. Medman'• lnftu\lODS. 

2. Alt,_.,. tbl uaat titlea of •· M.a.n•1 poait1ona 1Vled 

tl"I* tbae to ts., lt 11 tail" to .,. *" all ot hie im'enUana oonoern.4 1n thi• atter 'ftn d1recttly related to h18 Federal emplcr.raent. 

3. SiDCe the ilrnntlou wwe 1ll4e 4'1l'Ue tM pulo4 tl'Oll aboa 

1933 to 1942, wbea Ir. friedaan wu a c1T111an employee ill the Ott1oe 

of the Chief Stanal Ottloar, dOC11MDt..17 wU.aoe in tbe sat111"8 of 

laboftltory record•, oaat111'911Ce .aotee, am tlll 11lce, u ri111 aftilable, 

should be allODC ti. tile• ot that Ottloe, •hithatandbag the tU.. 

oovvtne the applJA&Uou tor patent aN in 1ibe ouatoc.11 of tba •'loM' 

Seoa:ri't)' Agenoy. !he oft1o1al t1ndtnga ot tba Slgnal Corpe relati.w to 

the ralationa betwea Ir • .rriedman1a ~t am h18 aeNl'al inwntiolMI are to be t...S ta the Sipal C.,. Pat.en Board m.iDut.ea, oopin 

of which you haw. !Ila t1D4inp (with the Ol'tcUa1 n1cleMe to the 

u:Mnt that it oo\114 be feud) haw beu ~on wnra1 oc .. iena 

lV° tale Signal C...,. &Id bJ' JOU and haw nnR laea oha.Dp4. 

4. It u •UC&MW that tbe Ba:Nau or \be 8'14g9t mq baw aeW 

u.to a aiaappnheDeloa 1D raiaing the q'llUtiou at all 1S.. the lair 

a-p tbeNot Nlaksta. \o ExeoUtift Ot\!d 10096 whloh 'b¥ lta ileNa 

•••• ODlJ izmanUW ... atter 23 laf0ar119501 ~IW'e, 1. a. 

5721 .._ not i;n.-t Ir. Med.ma u a olat•nt ln \be uaml w 

but n.t!Mtr u a peU.Uaa1T. 

CC: C/S 

AG., 

301C 

.302L 

M/Ra The indorsement is self-explanatory. The AG has in his files the 

background material relating to this matter. (See, for example, lat Ind, 

j:r "'l "i r.-i: jt _ 

£ 

29 Feb 52, rm DIRAFSA to JAG, D/A, subject, in p as ve.) 

2 -'1/ 7 ency .. ! t~:R/D:60293 HBSTAUFFER:IL~SS~i293 / 

30?.L:i72J

7

:

7 

an '"" roved for Release b ursuantto E.O. 1352
Petitions Invoking Exceptions to PCRA Time Limitations Final Report: 10/01/2019

FINAL REPORT1

Revision of the Comments to Pa.Rs.Crim.P. 900 and 901

PETITIONS INVOKING EXCEPTIONS TO THE TIME LIMITATIONS OF THE PCRA

On October 1, 2019, effective immediately, upon the recommendation of the 

Criminal Procedural Rules Committee, the Court revised the Comments to Rule 900 

(Scope; Notice in Death Penalty Cases) and Rule 901 (Initiation Of Post-Conviction 

Collateral Proceedings) to reflect changes in the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 

Pa.C.S. § 9541 et seq., regarding the timing for raising exceptions to the Act’s one-year 

limitation for filing the petition.

This rule change is a technical correction to the Comments to Rule 900 and 901. 

The Post Conviction Relief Act provides that petitions for post-conviction relief must be 

filed within one year of the date that the judgment becomes final but also provides for 

exceptions to this time limitation. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b)(1). The time limit for 

raising these exceptions is contained in 42 Pa.C.S. §9545(b)(2). In 1995, the limitations 

were set at 60 days of the date when the claim could have been presented. In 

December 2018, this statutory section was amended to increase the time limitation for 

raising the exception from 60 days to one year.

The Comments to Rules 900 (Scope; Notice in Death Penalty Cases) and 901 

(Initiation of Post-Conviction Collateral Proceedings) reference Section 9545(b)(2) but 

contain the earlier 60-day time limitation rather than the current one-year time limitation. 

The Committee concluded that the Comments to these rules should be updated. 

Rather than change the specific time, the Committee believed it better to provide a 

cross-reference that did not contain the specific time limitation in the statute. In that 

way, the Comment would not need to be revised if the time limitation in the statute is 

amended again. Therefore, the following language containing the specific time 

limitation has been replaced with the statement, “For time limits for filing a petition for 

post-conviction relief and any exceptions, see 42 Pa.C.S. § 9545(b).”

 

1 The Committee's Final Reports should not be confused with the official Committee 

Comments to the rules. Also, note that the Supreme Court does not adopt the 

Committee's Comments or the contents of the Committee's explanatory Final Reports.