### 1603 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2011 / Notices

Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA) (16 U.S.C. 971 et seq. ). Issuance of EFPs and related permits are necessary for the collection of Highly Migratory Species (HMS) for public display and scientific research that is exempt from regulations ( e.g., seasons, prohibited species, authorized gear, and minimum sizes) that may prohibit the collection of live animals or biological samples. A Display Permit is issued for the collection of HMS for the purpose of public display whereas a Shark Research Permit allows the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and commercial shark fishermen to conductcooperative research to collect fisherydependent data for management of the Atlantic shark fishery.

The regulations at 50 CFR 600.745 and 50 CFR 635.32 govern scientific research activity, exempted fishing, and exempted educational activities with respect to Atlantic HMS. Since the Magnuson-Stevens Act does not consider scientific research to be

‘‘ fishing, ’’ scientific research is exempt from this statute, and NMFS does not issue EFPs for bona fide research activities ( e.g., research conducted from a research vessel and not a commercial or recreational fishing vessel) involving species that are regulated only under the Magnuson-Stevens Act ( e.g., most species of sharks) and not under ATCA. NMFS requests copies of scientific research plans for these activities and indicates concurrence by issuing a LOA to researchers to indicate that the proposed activity meets the definition of research and is therefore exempt from regulation.

Scientific research is not exempt from regulation under ATCA. NMFS issues SRPs for collection of species managed under this statute ( e.g., tunas, swordfish, billfish), which authorize researchers to collect HMS from bona fide research vessels ( e.g., NMFS or university research vessel.) NMFS will issue an EFP when research/collection involving Atlantic tunas, swordfish, and billfishes occurs from commercial or recreational fishing platforms.

To regulate these fishing activities, NMFS needs information to determine the justification of granting an EFP, LOA, SRP, Display or Shark Research Permit. The application requirements are detailed at 50 CFR 600.745(b)(2). Interim, annual and no-catch/fishing reports must also be submitted to the HMS Management Division within NMFS. The authority for the HMS Management Division for requiring this information is found at 50 CFR 635.32(a). II. Method of Collection Respondents have a choice of either electronic or paper forms. Methods of submittal include e-mail of electronic forms, mail and facsimile transmission of paper forms.

III. Data

OMB Control Number: 0648–0471. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Regular submission (extension of a currently approved collection).

Affected Public: Non-profit institutions; State, local, or tribal government; business or other for-profit organizations.

Estimated Number of Respondents:
75.

Estimated Time Per Response: 2 hours for a scientific research plan; 40 minutes for an application for an EFP, Display Permit, SRP, Shark Research Permit or LOA for HMS; 1 hour for an interim report; 40 minutes for an annual fishing report; 15 minutes for an application for an amendment; 5 minutes for notification of departure phone calls to NMFS Enforcement; 2 minutes for ‘‘nocatch’’ reports; and 2 minutes for tag applications.

Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 236.

Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $119 in recordkeeping/reporting
costs. IV. Request for Comments

Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology.

Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record.

Dated: January 5, 2011. Gwellnar Banks, Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011–275 Filed 1–10–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–22–P COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING**  **COMMISSION**

**Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection,** **Comment Request: Reporting of Pre enactment Swap Transactions** 

**AGENCY :**  Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  The Commodity Futures Trading Commission ( ‘‘ Commission ’’ or

‘‘ CFTC ’’ ) is announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act ( ‘‘PRA ’’ ), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information and to allow 60 days for public comment. The Commission recently adopted an interim final rule, as required by the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ( ‘‘DoddFrank Act’’ ), requiring counterparties to a pre-enactment unexpired swap to report such swaps according to such rules as the Commission may in the future adopt. This notice solicits comments on the record retention requirement that is embedded in the interim final rule’s reporting requirement, which was recognized by the Commission in an interpretive note to the final rule.

**DATES :**  Comments must be submitted on or before March 14, 2011.

**ADDRESSES :**  You may submit comments, identified by ‘‘Pre-Enactment Swap Collection, ’’ by any of the following methods:

• The Agency’s Web site, at http:// comments.cftc.gov/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments through the Web site.

• Mail: David A. Stawick, Secretary of the Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Three Lafayette Centre, 1155 21st Street, NW., Washington, DC 20581.

• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail above. Please submit your comments using only one method.

All comments must be submitted in English, or if not, accompanied by an English translation. Comments will be posted as received to http:// www.cftc.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Susan Nathan, Division of Market Oversight, Senior Special Counsel, CFTC, (202) 418–5133; e-mail: snathan@cftc.gov

.


### 1604 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 11, 2011 / Notices

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Under the PRA, Federal agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget ( ‘‘ OMB ’’ ) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.

‘‘ Collection of Information ’’ is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3 and includes agency requests or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this requirement, the CFTC is publishing notice of the proposed collection of information listed below.

Abstract: Section 729 of the DoddFrank Act required the CFTC to adopt, within 90 days of enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, an interim final rule for the reporting of swap transactions entered into before July 21, 2010 whose terms had not expired as of that date ( ‘‘ pre-enactment unexpired swaps ’’ ). Pursuant to this mandate, the CFTC adopted an interim final rule requiring specified parties to pre-enactment unexpired swap transactions to report certain information related to such transactions to a swap data repository ( ‘‘ SDR’’ ) or to the Commission by the compliance date to be established in reporting rules required under Section 2(h)(5) of the CEA, or within 60 days after an appropriate SDR becomes registered under Section 21 of the CEA and commences operations to receive and maintain data related to such swap, whichever occurs first. An interpretative note to the rule advises that counterparties that may be required to report to an SDR or the CFTC will need to preserve information pertaining to the terms of such swaps.

Burden Statement: The respondent burden for this collection is estimated to be .5 hours per response. These estimates include the time to locate the information related to the pre-enactment unexpired swap transactions and the time to ensure such information is maintained in such form as it currently exists.

Respondents/Affected Entities: Swap Dealers, Major Swap Participants, and other counterparties to a swap transaction ( i.e., end-user, non-SD/nonMSP counterparties).

Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,800.

Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 900 hours.

Frequency of Collection: Once. Issued by the Commission this 5th day of January, 2011. David Stawick, Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011–326 Filed 1–10–11; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6351–01–P**

**CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE** 

**Sunshine Act Meeting Notice**

The White House Council for Community Solutions gives notice of their following first meeting:

**DATE AND TIME :**  Friday, February 4, 2011, 1 p.m.–3 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.

**PLACE :**  The Council will meet in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building. This meeting will be streamed live for public viewing and a link will be available on the council’s Web site: http://www.serve.gov/ communitysolutions.

**PUBLIC COMMENT :**  The public is invited to submit publicly available comments through the Council’s Web site. To send statements to the Council, please send written statements to the Council’s electronic mailbox at WhiteHouseCouncil@cns.gov. The public can also follow the Council’s work by visiting its Web site: http:// www.serve.gov/communitysolutions.

**STATUS :**  Open.

**MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED :**  The purpose of this meeting is to review the Council’s charge, discuss the key issues impacting youth employment, education, work preparedness and the healthy transition to adulthood, and establish committees to carry out the Council’s work.

**CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION :**  Susannah Washburn, Executive Director, White House Council for Community Solutions, Corporation for National and Community Service, 10th Floor, Room 10911, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20525. Phone (202) 606–6740. Fax (202) 606– 3464. E-mail: swashburn@cns.gov

.

Dated: January 6, 2011. Susannah Washburn,

Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2011–467 Filed 1–7–11; 11:15 am]

**BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE**

**Office of the Secretary**

**Renewal of Department of Defense Federal Advisory Committees** 

**AGENCY :**  Department of Defense. **ACTION :**  Notice of Renewal of Federal Advisory Committee

**SUMMARY :**  Under the provisions of section 596 of Public Law 110–417, section 594 of Public Law 111–84 and the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972, (5 U.S.C. Appendix), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b), and 41 CFR 102– 3.50, the Department of Defense gives notice that it is renewing the charter for the Military Leadership Diversity Commission (hereafter referred to as the

‘‘ Commission’’ ).

The Commission is a nondiscretionary federal advisory committee that shall provide the President and Congress a comprehensive evaluation and assessment of minority promotion and advancement policies.

The commission, pursuant to section 596(d) of Public Law 110–417, shall:

a. Carry out a comprehensive study to evaluate and assess policies that provide opportunities for the promotion and advancement of minority members of the U.S. Armed Forces, including minority members who are senior officers; and

b. In carrying out the study, the Commission shall examine the following:

(1) The efforts to develop and maintain diverse leadership at all levels of the Armed Forces.

(2) The successes and failures of developing and maintaining a diverse leadership, particularly at the general and flag officer positions.

(3) The effect of expanding Department of Defense secondary educational programs to diverse civilian populations, to include military service academy preparatory schools.

(4) The ability of current recruitment and retention practices to attract and maintain a diverse pool of qualified individuals in sufficient numbers in officer pre-commissioning programs.

(5) The ability of current activities toincrease continuation rates for ethnicand gender-specific members of the Armed Forces.

(6) The benefits of conducting an annual conference attended by civilian military, active-duty and retired military and corporate leaders on diversity, to include a review of current policy and the annual demographic data from the Defense Equal Opportunity Management Institute.

(7) The status of prior recommendations made to the Department of Defense and to Congress concerning diversity initiatives within the Armed Forces.