alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13334]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05833]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-165-2014)


Approval of Expansion of Subzone 57C; DNP Imagingcomm America 
Corporation; Concord, North Carolina

    On December 10, 2014, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Charlotte 
Regional Partnership, Inc., grantee of FTZ 57, requesting the expansion 
of Subzone 57C subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 57, on 
behalf of DNP Imagingcomm America Corporation in Concord, North 
Carolina.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (79 FR 75125, 12-10-2014). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the 
application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval.
    Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board's Executive 
Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 57C is 
approved, subject to the FTZ Act and the Board's regulations, including 
section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 57's 2,000-acre activation 
limit.

    Dated: March 9, 2015.
Andrew McGilvray,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05833 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7045

THERON JOHNNY MAXTON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID M. BEASLEY, Governor; MICHAEL MOORE,

Director; BARBARA SHEEN; LAURIE BESSINGER,

Warden; DOCTOR BEINOR; NURSE SNYDER; NURSE

MITCHELL,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CA-98-1228-10-18BD)

Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 18, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theron Johnny Maxton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). Appellant’s case was

referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B)

(1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and

advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this

recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court

order based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas

v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review

by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32 (1)


Certification of Chief Executive Officer





I, Andrew B. Schmitt, President and Chief Executive Officer of Layne Christensen Company (the "Company"), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(a)           the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2011, which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(b)           the information contained in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2011, which this certification accompanies, fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  April 15, 2011

/s/ A.B. SchmittAndrew B. SchmittPresident and Chief Executive Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2188 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the 

humanitarian device exemption. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 21, 2015 

Mr. GARDNER (for himself and Mr. DONNELLY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with 

respect to the humanitarian device exemption. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rare Disease Innova5 tion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HUMANITARIAN DEVICE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 520(m) of the Federal 

8 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360j) is amend9 ed— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2188 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘fewer than 

2 4,000’’ and inserting ‘‘not more than 8,000’’; 

3 (2) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ‘‘fewer than 

4 4,000’’ and inserting ‘‘not more than 8,000’’; and 

5 (3) in paragraph (6)(A)(ii), by striking ‘‘4,000’’ 

6 and inserting ‘‘8,000’’. 

7 (b) GUIDANCE DOCUMENT ON PROBABLE BEN8 EFIT.—Not later than 18 months after the date of enact9 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Health and Human 

10 Services, acting through the Commissioner of Food and 

11 Drugs, shall publish a draft guidance document that de12 fines the criteria for establishing ‘‘probable benefit’’ as 

13 that term is used in section 520(m)(2)(C) of the Federal 

14 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360j(m)(2)(C)). 

15 (c) REPORTS TO CONGRESS.—Five years after the 

16 date of enactment of this Act and every 5 years thereafter, 

17 the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall submit 

18 to Congress a report on the effect of the amendments 

19 made by subsection (a). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
REF ID:A64619 

2l October l.954 

~lORNR.~: 

Dr. 'l'ukey called at o84; on 21 October 19511-. I aid aubate.ntiall.y 

u f'ollovat 

iaAll at ~ an mat haPW to coop.tra.~ vit.h ;you and rour group 

1n ftV•r:t lllCQ' pos•fnle. l'het Chier at Start th.Ulk.e it ~be ad:viMble 

tor rou to coma out eometima IOOn and d.ieCUJSs th$ mchanioa ot 

wbeequ.en't Tiai·h end \ha arr~m•mta tlw.t ea.u be -.db tor the 

he.nd.iing of Aff;f or t.ba at.ria'.l peculiar to !($A. n 

Dr. Tukey reaponded 1ubetant.i&lly u :tollova't 

nciear:cy ! v1ll >lOt be abl4J to do thi• tor several d81•· Thi• 

11 difficult to 4iacuas on too telephone. Moat ot our time thet•e 

&a.ya 1a •pent 'behin1. the bo.rri•r· • I U1 not oloe.l" OP. th~ «aphasia 

"ina g1v.n the ~d.l.ill4t or thie. Wormation 11 what we -.re ilVUI.~ 

lld.lJg in. 

"Lett• tloa.t f.l.~ sentl.y on this for A while- We ~ w.nt 

\o ao around three corner• on this Qtl.e.tt 

The COUV(tr#a.tion vaa tendna.ted with the underatanding that 

he vould call back at l(Dl';l in~f'inite time. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

/
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information (prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada) extracted from the
accounting records of Mitel Corporation and included in the Consolidated
Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended June 25, 1999 and the
Consolidated Balance Sheets as at June 25, 1999 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.46890<F1>
<CASH>                                          32,148
<SECURITIES>                                   106,286
<RECEIVABLES>                                  268,540
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,484
<INVENTORY>                                    190,385
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               632,791
<PP&E>                                         869,973
<DEPRECIATION>                                 387,618
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,204,576
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          304,589
<BONDS>                                        261,412
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     37,173
<COMMON>                                       328,382
<OTHER-SE>                                     242,466
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,204,576
<SALES>                                        311,182
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               311,182
<CGS>                                          168,716
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  168,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               141,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,623)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,623)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.05)<F3>
<FN>
<F1>The foreign exchange rate of 1.46890 should be used to translate the balance
sheet items from Canadian Dollars (figures above) to U.S. Dollars.  The three
months moving average foreign exchange rate of 1.47403 should be used to
translate the income statement items from Canadian Dollars (figures above) to
U.S. Dollars.
<F2>The figure quoted is EPS-Basic under Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
<F3>The figure quoted is EPS-Fully Diluted under Canadian Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.
</FN>


</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CLIFFORD BURDICK, DOC #270899, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-615 ) DANIELLE CAROLAINE LEAMING, ) ) Appellee. ) ___________________________________) Opinion filed October 5, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thane B. Covert, Judge. Clifford Burdick, DOC #270899, pro se Appellant. Danielle Carolaine Leaming, pro se Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK 

### , and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hauck, 133 Ohio St.3d 1232, 2012-Ohio-5271.]

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAUCK. 

[Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Hauck, 

133 Ohio St.3d 1232, 2012-Ohio-5271.] 

(No. 2011-0023—Submitted October 17, 2012—Decided November 15, 2012.) 

ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an 

application for reinstatement by respondent, John Wesche Hauck, Attorney 

Registration No. 0023153, last known business address in Cincinnati, Ohio. 

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of July 7, 2011, 

wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent from 

the practice of law for a period of 12 months, with six months stayed on 

conditions, and its order of March 5, 2012, wherein the court found respondent in 

contempt for failure to comply with this court’s July 7, 2011 order and revoked 

the six-month stay of the original suspension and suspended respondent from the 

practice of law for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), 

finds that respondent has substantially complied with those orders and with the 

provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). 

{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to 

the practice of law in the state of Ohio. 

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before 30 days from the date of this 

order, relator shall file with the clerk of this court the name of the attorney who 

will serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is 

further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, relator shall 

file with the clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during the 

probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that at the end of the probationary period, 

respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. 

V(9). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated 

until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in 

compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all 

other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the 

Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the clerk of this court a 

report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, 

and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated. 

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies 

of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made 

as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of 

publication. 

O’CONNOR, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL,

LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. 

______________________
EXHIBIT23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board ofDirectorsCPI Aerostructures, Inc.

We hereby consentto incorporation by reference in Registration Numbers 333-11669 and333-42403 on Form S-8 and Registration Numbers 333-08391 and 333-08216on Form S-3 of our report dated January 30, 2004 on the statements ofincome, shareholders' equity, and cash flows of CPIAerostructures, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2003, which appearin the December 31, 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of CPIAerostructures, Inc.

/s/ Goldstein GolubKessler LLP            

**GOLDSTEINGOLUB KESSLER LLP** New York, New York

March 30, 2005

----
ltoom 

' 5 Jiiclre .. onlg 

'"rha'Comn;lllltloner or l'atenl11, 

Wasllin1.<tun, n. C: .. " 

and nu& nny om~1111 hy llama • 

REF ID:A67553 .... .. !:C.fl 

6891- _; ''- .. ' · ... DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE ... 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFf'ICE 

WASHINGTON 

./ ' .. 

Pa11t•r No. _, 

All communic:ntionll rr.s;&tin11 thiN 

application o;huuld 11ivo the HCrial number, 

dnlO of lillng, aP•I name"' 

the 11ppllc1111t 

Please /i,nd below a commun.icalioli. !!.·.;., .. ~ ~he EXAJJllNER in. 

charge of this application. ~~-( ·-~~ 

TO:DD-'J _, ••• 4•~r.•:i Commmi1mu of Pa:u:111, Applicant: ·1alliai.n i•·. l't•iadmC\n 

r:c1. ~··Ell" ~- • Snod;,-:rs .$ s ~-: 

Gh~rlcs p ... Howe • f _ rJ''· ~. "' ·' .,,,., ... f t•\."' Lj r l 'or-n~ C/'.J ~--· '>~L.•.<.J. ''· /lo;; ..... I 1.-7• 

r~uni tions Dldg. / ~.:Jashincton, ,L;• c. _____..,,/ 

Ser. No. 

.Filed 

For 

~d-2 Cl sh.; b pn.) 

I ( l Elh. i 3 II ) 

II _,l l -:,; " -?c. -,, 

rt _,, - .. 

~~-73 .. 

over any of' the ?>E1~;ents 1·ror:1 lil~~ss 35-20 l.ien.tAt Hitowine grooves 1. e. 

chelnnels ancl ti.1.e others b~•f:HHi holdins 1;hc s t.i•:lyH'l b~ ME'&r1s 1;.he 

.full equ.ivulent ot' ll r~roovec1 bsse. 

Glair.1s 2-7 t1re ro,jfle;ted on Ut~ . .J'OH.r:1u 01· i~.cl-: ol".' 

inde£inlte in l!n~ 5. 1-,o "P.'l"T•i.1.:r 

.:• t .. I l.J ::toneE, Jones and 

1~J.:::1i!'.'1F- 15-19 in "slidahle t;o per•:11t" a1•e indefinite 

following the reasoning of the Jones decision for 1 t soona 

obvious thn t alincn~nt can be r.wdc. \C/hethoz• the ;:.icnhcr :.i r.:ovr.s or not 

provided :: 'i.; :.loes notllinc; to p1•event tt-.e !;lidcs novinf;e 

lA\pproved f~r Release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§ 
,----------··--

' 

300,212 -2-

,, ' r \ \ ___ _) REF ID:A67553 0 

The art shows that the line indicator can be stat1onE1ry on the 

base without adversely affecting the slidability of the 

letter bea:iing r.1emhers. These claims are thftre!'ore l"'fljf'<~ted. 

The claims are grouped as follows: 

I. Generic claims 1-7• 

II. Specific to figu1'e b claims U, 11-15. 

III. Specific to figure b hav1nt.; et1ual e izo mambe1·s an.d 

equal number of grooves. claim 9. 

IV~ Specific to figure b he.vinp 1mPqueJ. s1.ze mfn-"lb~x·s and 

U&""lequal nuriher• of p;rom.rfts. clalm 10. 

V. 8pec1f'1c to fir,ure 2. cla 1ms 16-19. 

S!n~e the ren~ric clains are rejected division and 

election are z·equirod under Hula 41 on the basis of the 

grouping. In the first place division and election should 

be rru::de bet\'Teen clu1mti B ~md ll-15 on the one h&nel and nlaims 

91 10, 1i-19 on the o·bher. 

AgEiin division und election are required lmder 

Rule LJ.1 betv1een clElims 10 on the one hand and lb-19 on 

the other since claims H t-1nd ll-15 e;ene1 .. ic to cl::d.ma lU and 

16-19 hav~ been rejected. 

hrt pEn·tiner1t to f'olci~hlt1 aevicas und n-::>ldcrs 

within holders is cited. The holde1•s nf ;i:i.lJ.iE;:.:::ifion 01•e of' 

dil.1'e~ent sizes. Thea fl 1 ·Ei tents ,,.,erP. t'mmc1 on ·cursory 

search. 

l~aminer. 

_J
SECTION 906 CEO AND CFO CERTIFICATION (1)






Exhibit 32 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 
In connection with the Quarterly Report of NCR Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), that: 
		
	(1)
	the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


		
	(2)
	the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


The foregoing certification (i) is given to such officers’ knowledge, based upon such officers’ investigation as such officers reasonably deem appropriate; and (ii) is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. 


	
				
	Date:
	July 29, 2011
	 
	/s/ William Nuti

	 
	 
	 
	Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President






	
				
	Date:
	July 29, 2011
	 
	/s/ Robert Fishman

	 
	 
	 
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer






A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to NCR Corporation and will be retained by NCR Corporation and furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 97-2802ND

_____________

Kent Laber, individually and by Phyllis *

Laber, his guardian ad litem, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the District

v. * of North Dakota.

*

Heritage Mutual Insurance Company, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

_____________

 Submitted: February 11, 1998

Filed: February 20, 1998

_____________

Before FAGG, JOHN R. GIBSON, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

_____________

PER CURIAM.

Kent Laber, individually and by Phyllis Laber, his guardian ad litem, appeals

from the adverse ruling of the district court in this diversity-based dispute about the

scope of Laber's underinsured motorist coverage. The district court concluded that a

non-airborne plane was not a motor vehicle for the purposes of interpreting the

underinsured motorist coverage under North Dakota law. Because this is a diversity

action, we review de novo questions of state law. Having considered the record and

the parties' briefs, we are satisfied the district court correctly applied the relevant state

law and the record supports the district court's ruling. We also conclude a
-2-

comprehensive opinion in this diversity case would lack precedential value. We thus

affirm on the basis of the district court's ruling without further discussion. See 8th Cir.

R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EPSOM
ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD. 
  CalciTech
Ltd.
 CP 261,
10 route de l’aeroport
 1215
Geneva 15
 Switzerland
 
 25th
February 2009
  Dears
Sirs,
 
 Re:
Credit Facility Agreement
 
 I can confirm that upon completion of
the debt restructuring agreed on 23rd
February 2009, Epsom will increase the credit facility limit from $2.5 million
to $3 million.  The effective interest rate on the balance drawn down
will be reduced from 3.5% to 1.75%
 
 If you require and further information,
please do not hesitate to contact me.
 
 Yours
faithfully,
 for and
on behalf of Epsom Asset Management Ltd.
 
 “David
Craven”
 
 David
Craven
 Director
 
 Registered Office: Main
Street, Charlestown, Nevis, West Indies
 Administrative office: P.O.
Box 254, 1215 Geneva 15, Switzerland
 Tel.
(+41) 22 7990800        Fax (+41) 22
7990801
EXHIBIT  99.3

                                              REVOCABLE PROXY

                                       SECURITY BANK HOLDING COMPANY
                                      SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
                                                           , 1997

                                 PROXY SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

         The  undersigned  hereby  appoints  Charles D.  Brummel  and Michael J.
Delvin,  and each of them,  proxies with power of substitution to vote on behalf
of the  undersigned  all shares of common stock of Security Bank Holding Company
(the "Company") at the Annual Meeting to be held on , 1997, and any adjournments
thereof,  with all powers the undersigned  would possess if personally  present,
with respect to the following:

1.       Acquisition of Pacific State Bank.
         Approval of Agreement  and Plan of  Reorganization  and related Plan of
Merger,   pursuant  to  which   Security   Bank  Holding   Company  would  issue
approximately  1,244,607  shares of Class A Common  Stock in exchange for all of
the outstanding shares of Pacific State Bank.

             [   ]  FOR     [   ]  AGAINST         [   ]ABSTAIN


     2. Other  Matters.  At the  discretion of the proxy  holder,  on such other
business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournments thereof.

THE SHARES REPRESENTED BY THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED ABOVE, BUT IF NO
SPECIFICATION  IS MADE,  THIS  PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE  Proxies  may vote in
their  discretion as to other matters which may come before the meeting,  except
for adjournment if Item 1 is marked to vote against the Merger.

Number of Shares Held:


Dated:                                                     , 1997





         Please  date  and sign  exactly  as your  name  appears  on your  stock
         certificate(s)  (which  should  be the same as the name on the  address
         label on the  envelope in which this proxy was sent to you),  including
         designation as executor,  trustee,  etc., if applicable.  A corporation
         must sign its name by the president or other  authorized  officer.  All
         co-owners must sign.