alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman Basic SIR EDWARD S. THOMAS, JR.

United States Air Force

ACM S32184 (f rev)

26 February 2015

Sentence adjudged 23 September 2013 by SPCM convened at Tinker

Air Force Base, Oklahoma. Military Judge: Natalie D. Richardson (sitting 

alone).

Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 2 months.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Major Christopher D. James.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Major Roberto Ramírez and 

Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before

HECKER, MITCHELL, and CONTOVEROS

Appellate Military Judges

OPINION OF THE COURT

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent 

under AFCCA Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

PER CURIAM:

A special court-martial composed of a military judge convicted the appellant, 

pursuant to his pleas, of wrongfully using marijuana and breaking restriction, in violation 

of Articles 112a and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 912a, 934. The adjudged sentence 

consisted of a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 2 months. On 11 November 

2013, the convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged.

On 29 October 2014, we remanded this case for withdrawal of the original action 

and for new post-trial processing after we found plain error when the convening authority 
 2 ACM S32184 (f rev)

was not advised about a clemency recommendation made by the military judge. United 

States v. Thomas, ACM S32184 (A.F Ct. Crim App. 29 October 2014) (unpub. op.). On 

5 January 2015, following that corrected post-trial processing, the convening authority 

approved the sentence as originally adjudged. After the case was returned to this court on 

14 January 2015, the appellant elected not to file a supplemental assignment of error.

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Articles 59(a) and 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859(a), 866(c). Accordingly, the findings and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

STEVEN LUCAS

Clerk of the Court
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Mid-Iowa Financial Corp.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (No. 33-63038 and 333-24049) on Forms S-8 of Mid-Iowa
Financial Corp. of our report dated November 14, 1997, relating
to the consolidated balance sheets of Mid-Iowa Financial Corp.
and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1997 and 1996, the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended
September 30, 1997, which report appears in the September 30,
1997 annual report on Form 10-KSB of Mid-Iowa Financial Corp.
and subsidiaries.

                             /s/  KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
December 19, 1997
() REF(~;p:A4148484 

13 '-......./ . 

Soo. 4894. R. S. (U.S. C., title 35, sec. 37. All applicat.ions for patents shall be completed and prepared for 

examination within six months after the filing of the 

application, and in default thereof, or upon failure of the 

applicant to prosecute the same within six months or 

such shorter time, not less than thirty days or any extensions thereof, as ·shall be fixed by the Commissioner of 

Patents in writing to the. applicant after any action 

therein, of which notice shall have been given to the 

applicant, they shall be regarded as abandoned by the 

parties thereto, unless it be shown to the satisfaction 

of the Commissioner of Patents that such delay was unAbandonment 

of uppllcu tlon 

by failure to .:om plete or prosecute 

within time 

allowed. As 

amended by act of Aug. 7, 

l !139, 53 Stat. 

1264. 

avoidable: Provided, however, That no application shall Government avpllcattonll .. 

be regarded as abandoned which has become the property 

of the Government of the United States and with respect 

to which the head of any department of the Government 

shall have certified to the Commissioner of Patents, within a period of three :v,ears, that the invention disclosed 

therein is important to the armament or defense of the 

United States: Provided, fu1·tlier, That within ninety 

days, and not less than thirty days; before the expiration of any such three-year period the Commissioner of 

Patents shall, in writing, notify the head o:f_the department interested 'in any pending application for patent, 

of the approaching expir:_atiol1 of the three-year period 

within which any application for patent shall have been 

pending . 

..1.c_t of Mar. 9!, 199!7, 44 Stat. 1837: 

SEc;~~.4. (U..°'3: C.,. title 3g;:iiec. 21.) Where the dai, "" '° • ,.,.·· . .:;... . or the last .. :.t~, fixed uy o;tatute for tali.mg Any ad10n 

or payin·g a11y'-i:.-.P, in}-he Unit".'!d Sta ks Patent Ot!lce falls 

on Sunday, or on".-~+0liday witlri.;! the Distrir,t of Col:.unTime tor Rctloll 

expiring on Sunday or holiday. 

bia, the .:ctimi may &.,taken, or tl:e fo~/paid, o.n th('\ 

next suci::<:eding secular 0? c.•1siness di\]· ''; 1 

A~iof Apr. JI, 1980,46 Stat;!Jjf)} - i;: 6 (U S n t··,.1 35 ,; 23·' Tl G ,• . Abandoned ..:>EC. • • _ • v., lL"e.. '·.s~v. .,, le - omr1.rns10ner appllcatlone 

of Pa:t.::nts )::; ·hereby · aut~i:lrized to ali:mally destrcy or ~:e~rJ4;1e:1i.er 

· otherwi_so <lispose oL~•'il the tiles and paper;:; belonging t0 

all a.ba'.~doned· ~:-,[:ilications whie;h have bee~· 0n file fo? 

rr.Jte than ~v;:.!nty y~ars. 

SEc. Ll.~05. R.S. (U. S. C., title 35, sp,c, 44.) Patents 

ma.v. be granted and issued or reissued to the assignee of 

t-!:.i~ iri:'entor or discoverer; but,the assignme1;~. must first 

·be entered af record· in the Patkht Office. And in all 

-· 702820°-46.-.c. :i' 

Patents 

granted to assignee. 

.• ,mended b7 

Ac·t of Mar; 8, 

18D.16 Stat. 

58:!. '\: 

------~--------- ------
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 23.4

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-69812) pertaining to the 1992 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock
Option Plan of Just Toys, Inc. of our report dated March 12, 1999, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Just Toys, Inc. for the
years ended December 31, 1998 and 1997 included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 1999.



                                                            /s/ERNST & YOUNG LLP


New York, New York
March 28, 2000
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a)
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Daniel M. Healy, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of North Fork
Bancorporation, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting. Date: August 9, 2004 By:
    /s/ Daniel M. HealyDaniel M. HealyExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 42
• REF ID:A67603 -

3 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT: 

Besearch and Development Budget for the Departm~nt of the Army 

To:AS80, 90 

From:AS-25 

BRIEF SUf)AMARY: 

CLASSIFICATION NUMBER: 

Budget and estimate requirements 

Date of Communication: 13 Nov. 19 47 

Date of Basic Document: 13 Nov. 1947 

Pending results of a staff study being made by AS-14, the 

following activities are considered research and development for 

budgetary purposes: 

All of RLD 

540 Research An~lysts in Operations Division 

22 employees in Analysis Section, Methods Branch, Security Division 

Classifier: ivlrs. Beyke Routed to: Files 

Typist: ~,~rs. Smith Date of Classifying: 20 Feb. 1948 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

and Development Activities 

WDGAS Form No. 1493 7 October 1946 44052 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 01-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 1-3 ?/07 '-:/7
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1816

FENYANG AJAMU STEWART,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MICHELLE K. LEE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District 

Judge. (1:16-cv-00213-LMB-JFA)

Submitted: November 17, 2016 Decided: November 21, 2016

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Fenyang Ajamu Stewart, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, 

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Stephen Gerald Romero, Jr., 

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Fenyang Ajamu Stewart appeals the district court’s order 

denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. Stewart v. Lee, No. 

1:16-cv-00213-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed June 15, 2016 & entered June 

16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
REF ID:A41587~ ,., 

Ccri~t 2. z 2. 2-

13 APR 1954 

Dll'. 

b 

Jolm 

JJwtitute 

voe ~ 

tw A~od s~ 

Pr1meton t1nivwt1tJ' . l:'T1nceton, ,,_ Jiia"'1 

Deu'Jlr.·~;~: 

. Since our J.nn .loa:t4 ~~, Mr. /t.J'tJl.U:t v. ~' Q't tlae 

»ell !•le~ .~t.orte11, 1:u aeeqt.84_ ~ inv~:tatim ~o 

Sll!llbenb1p on the De1cts.t,1e M:rilo:7 ~· 

During ~, Mr. ~on ~ twQ ~ et ~ 1\fPtW:1· -.~. 

llOpintad 'With the JUabll&ht• ot cur OZ"l$1Ud.UOD., etatt aM. . . 

~les·il 

l-::r. ·Barton ~.octa to 'bo ~-for the 0041. APtU Metin& 

ot. the b:l:d •. 

WIWAH f' ~ 1'1UllMAB ~1ft -~ 

~ r-ctet:f.t1q ~ ~ · 

.M/B.: Announces aceepts.nce Qf. Joa.rd tnemberahip by Mt-. A. ll. Morton 

to Jlmibers at the NSABAB. · · 

cc: AG 

C/S . 

ri MeDoii&ld/lstLt, US.Al/ 

-Asst to S/ABS~/ero 

S/ASST (Mr. F.,,.. ............. •• 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a. 

•
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION VII

901 NORTH 5TH STREET

KANSAS CITY, KANSAS 66101

September 23, 2011

Dear Owner/Resident:

Luis E Galvez

Omaha, Nebraska 68105

1309 South 28 Street

 1309 South 28 Street

A Lead Based Paint assessment was recently performed on your property by the U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency as part of the Omaha Lead site investigation. The purpose of 

this assessment is to determine whether a significant quantity of LBP is present on the exterior 

surface of structures, where deteriorating paint conditions (peeling, flaking, cracking, etc) exist 

that might increase lead concentrations in the yard above acceptable levels.

Enclosed are the LBP assessment sheets for 1309 South 28 Street. The EPA has developed paint 

stabilization eligibility criteria that involve measuring the amount of deteriorated LBP on a 

structure and calculating the concentration of lead in soils around the home that would result if 

all of the identified deteriorated paint were to fall to the ground and uniformly mix with the soil 

under certain assumptions. During the LBP assessment, the areal extent of the deteriorated paint 

observed on structure surfaces was estimated and the lead content in the deteriorated paint was 

measured using an X-Ray Fluorescence instrument.

The data obtained during the LBP assessment was used to estimate the increase in soil lead 

concentration that would result if all of the deteriorating paint identified in the assessment were 

to fall to the ground and mix with surface soil within six feet of the foundation of the structure. 

For purposes of this calculation, the deteriorating LBP on a structure is assumed to fall onto the 

ground surface within six feet of the foundation and be uniformly mixed with the top one inch 

of soil. The estimated lead concentration in the soil potentially caused by the deteriorating LBP 

provides a measure of the severity of LBP deterioration on individual structures. The EPA uses 

these criteria to rank properties based on the potential for recontamination of soil to occur. Paint 

stabilization is being offered at only those households with the most severe LBP problems, 

particularly where children under the age of seven reside.

 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Assessment

The LBP assessment performed by the EPA using the above criteria indicated that your 

house IS NOT eligible for paint stabilization. 

RE: SAID: 20380
Enclosures

Para información en español, llame al EPA Information Center (402) 731-3045.

Sincerely,

Pauletta R. France-Isetts

Project Coordinator

Environmental Protection Agency

If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the EPA Public Information Center at 

(402) 731-3045.

*rnaha Lead Site LBP Assessment 1111111 11111 11111 IIIIIII~IIIIII 203 80 

.EGEND: H - N - P - 01 - 12345 Samples Analyzed 

BVlD Number 

- Sample Number 

Materlal P = Paint 

e of Structure N = North S = South E = East W = West 

Substrate Color Deteriorated 

(wood, concrete, etc.) Area Sample Number Concentration StructurelFeature 

(Window, siding, porch, etc3 

Red 1 ft2 

ft' 

ft2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          124093
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            1710
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    1060885
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          369853
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            362462
<LOANS>                                        2423531
<ALLOWANCE>                                      48912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 4098519
<DEPOSITS>                                     3238369
<SHORT-TERM>                                    464807
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              46678
<LONG-TERM>                                      35000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         62621
<OTHER-SE>                                      251044
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 4098519
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 149756
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                65810
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   682
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                216248
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               68012
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               85564
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           130684
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     4500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                2428
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  74534
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  74661
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       74661
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     44836
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.81
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.93
<LOANS-NON>                                      17246
<LOANS-PAST>                                      3169
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 13783
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 50210
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     9920
<RECOVERIES>                                      1031
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                48912
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             48912
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
OGA 

Mr. Jorie c.w. B'agelin 

A·I· Cryptoteknik :rordent~chtsvagen, 62 

Stockholm. 301 Sweden 

Dear :eor1e1 

REF ID:A63909 ., 

-

7 January 1955 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

~ thanks tor your .letter ot 31 December l.954, and especially 

tor ;your invitation to 'Vi•it you in Zug. 

Although I had hoped to ake the v1ait during thi.9 month, atter 

the 15th, I tilld now that it will be preterable tor me \to p.l&D. it tor 

the month ~ Febrt:1ar1. M1' recovery trom the eeige ot intluenza baa 

not been •o rapid u I bad counted on, and while l am at \the ottice 

every ~ now I think. it wouJ.d be better ~ I postpone rmlting the 

trip by- air until I have t"ul.J¥ recovered &2'ld. return to Zug \

111n great tora," as you aa.)'"1 to that I can the better en.1oy 'llt'J' vi•it v~th you. 

Aleo, 70u plan to be e.wwq around. the end ot this month and I 

would not want )'OU to have to ake preparations f'or r 

esaure whiQh aence t rate. 

poe pone rq v • v or ng, a• ca 

•econd ph ~. In any oaae I Ul aure that vbatever the 

reault ot our meetina vi,ll. "9# I ~ : I becaUae tllf....,-19 ~llll. truat. l!OIU",;,.., 1111<1 i'QPI~ Oil - 11llill. 

w11;Ji ~•pect to our Ct maob1:nea on order. lot all ot them call. 

tor t~ c~plaentar;r devic•, eul, 1n taot, ae I und.er•tand it, the 

eecotld or4er tor eight 0-52 •chines call tor the mchine• pl.us the 

varioua alternate pa.rte llmd. item tor converting them to CX-52, it 

dead.red. Kow I d.On' t think thia or4er cal.le tor the complementary 

teature lit> tbat it 1'1lled at once completion ot thia order would •uit 

wa tine.,i, d 

Ye #naJ.J¥ "11d at laat (what & cut1DS ott or a burd.e~1) abiplJ8d the ~u4cr1pt ot ~ book on 31: fJecember to the proapiative publiahera. 

1 

l\oprnved for Release bv ~-~SA on 06-19-2014 pursuant to E.O. 135i9 
- EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

I aaaume it wil1 be several months bef'ore we hear trom them. Toward 

the encl ar the job I f'elt that I could have and ahoUld have .devoted. 

that effort to a. more worthy opus but I might be wrong. We shall 

know soon at any rate. 

It the weather is propitious when I get to [ I, maybe 

I'll take a. tew days' holiday and go aouth, to seazy or to the :Riviera. 

What do you say to coming aJ.ongt 

I conveyed ;your regards to my 11boas, 11 who reciprocates, with a.ll 

good wishes ror the Nell Year. 

P.s. 

Looking forward to seeing you all soon, I em, 

SincereJ.7, 

WILLIAM t. FRIE1l4AN 

I forgot to tell you that very recently Mias Barth got worried 

about the year being up soon for her job. I took e.n intereot e.nd 

got her .fixed up so she doesn't have tbat worry now. 

_ ............ __ .,. ___ _