alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.1
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<Table>
<Caption>
                                              JURISDICTION
         SUBSIDIARY                         OF INCORPORATION
         ----------                         ----------------
<S>                                         <C>
SatCon Applied Technology, Inc.                Delaware
SatCon Power Systems, Inc.*                    Delaware
SatCon Electronics, Inc.**                     Delaware
Ling Electronics, Ltd.                         United Kingdom
SatCon Power Systems Canada, Ltd.              Canada
</Table>

----------
* Also doing business as "MagMotor" and "Ling Electronics"

** Also doing business as "Film Microelectronics, Inc."
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Texland Drilling Program-1981, LTD, (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof ( the Report),
we, Jerry N. Namy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and M. E. Chapman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|    |  |                                                       
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Jerry N. Namy                                     
|    |  | Jerry N. Namy Chief Executive Officer December 6, 2005
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ M. E. Chapman                                     
|    |  | M. E. Chapman Chief Financial Officer December 6, 2005
#### The State ex rel. Graff and others, Appellants, vs. Everett, Town Clerk, Respondent.

*April 26*

*May 16, 1899.*

Certiorari: *Town boards: Service upon clerk: Return: Jurisdiction.*

1. A writ of *certiorari*to review the acts of a hoard or body, unless it is not a continuing body or has ceased to exist, must go to the board, and, when directed to the legal custodian of its records, does not confer jurisdiction either of the subject matter or of the persons composing the board.

2. The return of a person, not competent to receive service of a writ of *certiorari*and make return, is a nullity.

3. A town board is a permanent body, and when its acts are sought to be reviewed on *certiorari*the writ should be directed to and served on its members as such board.

Appeal from au order of the circuit court for "Waukesha county: James J. Dice, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

Appeal from an order quashing a writ of *certiora/ri*issued on the relation of certain taxpayers of school district No. 3, town of Pewaukee, in said county, seeking to have declared *270void proceedings of tbe town board of such town attempting to establish a new school district therein, known as School District No. 4, partly out of the territory of the relators’ district. The writ was directed to and served upon the town clerk, who made return thereto. The relators appealed.

Eor the appellants there were briefs by *Ryan da Merton,*and oral argument by *E. Merton.*

*C. E.*Arinin, for the respondent.

Maeshall, J.

It has been repeatedly held by this court that, except in particular cases of necessity, as where the board or body whose acts are sought to be reviewed is not a continuing body or has ceased to exist, a writ of *certiora/ri*cannot properly go to a mere ministerial officer because he is the legal custodian of the records showing the facts in regard to the action to be reviewed, but that the writ must go to the board, otherwise the court cannot obtain jurisdiction either of the subject matter or the persons composing such board; and that a return by a person who is not competent to receive service of the writ and make return thereto is a nullity. *State ex rel. Tibbits v.*Milwaukee, 86 Wis. 376; *State ex rel. Ollinger v.*Manitowoc, 92 Wis. 546; *State ex rel. Clancy v. McGovern,*100 Wis. 666; *State ex rel. Flint v. Common Council of Fond du*Lac, 42 Wis. 287. That rule governs this case. The town board was a permanent body. The writ should have been directed to the members thereof as such board. The issuance of the writ and service of it upon the clerk, and his return thereto, gave the court no jurisdiction and therefore it was properly quashed. If the court had proceeded to dispose of the matter complained of on the merits, the judgment would have been a nullity. *State ex rel. Ollinger v. Manitowoc, supra.*

*By the*Cowrt.— The order appealed from is affirmed.
REF ID : A68 7JJ...2 

Brigadier. General Teltord Tqlor, US.Ail 

400 Madison Avenue 

Nelt York, New York 

·Dear Tel: 

~-. 

jJ.o-2nd street, s.E. 

Washington 31 D. C. 

17 August 1953 

In accordance with your suggestion, I send you herewith a 

brief biographical sketch ot our son, John, 1fbo upon seeing your ·- · name menticmed in· connection. vlth the WAshington Poat account or 

the establishment or the NatioMl Issues Conmittee asked me to 

preaent h1s name to you· in the hOpe that you would be 1n a position 

to turt.her his desire to be considered a candidate tor some position - with the new organization. 

It appears that our two offspring have been reared 1n the 

liberal trs.dition and we are rather glad to see both or them take 

a deep interest in public affairs, espacial.J¥ such as those vhicb 

have led to the establishment of the lll.C •. 

AnytihinS that you can do. tor John by ... of sending bi$ papers 

to the person who might glven them serious consideration ill his 

candidacy fol a potition with the NIC wUl be much appreciated by 

llipbeth and me. 

' 

It wu ~ nice to talk '.14th ,Ou and at the same time a,. 

a ~ing to Ken Mai.dment· whom w recalled with affection. 

Sincm."8]31 

l§'pproved for Release bv NSA on 04-04-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352d ' '
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05965]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Cancellation Notice--OPIC March 11, 2015 Public 
Hearing

    OPIC's Sunshine Act notice of its Public Hearing in Conjunction 
with each Board meeting was published in the Federal Register (Volume 
80, Number 31, Pages 8368 and 8369) on February 17, 2015. No requests 
were received to provide testimony or submit written statements for the 
record; therefore, OPIC's public hearing scheduled for 2 p.m., March 
11, 2015 in conjunction with OPIC's March 19, 2015 Board of Directors 
meeting has been cancelled.
    Contact Person for Information: Information on the hearing 
cancellation may be obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202) 336-8438, or 
via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#74371b1a1a1d115a301b031a07341b041d175a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="07446869696e622943687069744768776e6429606871">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: March 11, 2015.
Connie M. Downs,
OPIC Corporate Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05965 Filed 3-11-15; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I ' I 

I 

t. 

' \ 

~ 

Q -·---EE 

REF ID: A6·9B4., _ 

. . 

Mr. V. B. Voa Stan 

1'1\llicaticms . !bt Jlul4. Co'tpon.tltas 1700MWlhlM\ . ''. 

Santa Mca1ca, C&Ut~ -

DIN" Mr. VOA 8-t 

Receipt ot ~ letter-.~ 5 iow....- 19'3 

With the ~loa\D'e u ~-

I V1lh to ap:re .. '1111" &P,Preeiattoa to 10'l 

rw Hll41llC • tl'le BAllD !le.-rcb. .........._ .. _ 

s~, 

cc: AG . c/s _ · · 

S/ASST (Mr. FrJ.edman),........-

MfR: Acknovledgeaen.t ·of' :receil't of RABI> Reaearch 

Memoraiida from the bn4 Corporation. 

F:BfOUDll,/S/ABST/60493/30 Nov 53 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-04-2014 pursuantto E .0. 13526. 

' " 
/. 

REF ID:~69846 

lb'. V,. l\. Von SonJl 

c/o Pu'b11QJ.t1om · 

9Je Baod. Coipora~10D 

1700 Ha1n Street 

Senta Mom.ea, CalltQJ'D.1a 

Dear Mr, VOll So.mu 

.. ' ' •' 

·ee 

. :Receipt. or'~ letter~ 1;.r!))~ 19~ 'With the 

· incloaun 1a aeklx:nt~~ 

> •• n' 

l Yiah ~ GX,pnu _, annc:J.ation "to 70\l tor .. na1ns . .. • the llJUm Rneat'Ch ~,: 

. " 

'. 

'. AG . ., cc: c/s, . . . \ . . 

S/ASST (Mr. FriedDE.n) ·V 

,, 

. 'rilW.AH , • 1.BilllCA.I 

Special "-•1~ 

M/R: .Ackno'Wledgment Of receipt of RAND Research Menr:>randum 

from the Rand Corporation. 

". 

" M. M. 'Felerski/S/ PSST/60493/ ll Feb 54 

. "
<PAGE>

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-77891) of RoweCom Inc. of our report dated
July 1, 1999 relating to the financial statements of Corporate Subscription
Services, Inc., which appears in the Current Report on Form 8-K/A of RoweCom
Inc. dated August 13, 1999.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
August 13, 1999
j REF ID:A487983 

-~" ~':sd, ' 

-

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-12-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 
• 

• 

• 

REF ID:A487983 

THE UlJJlitOO llf!§&: 

l&o. G. :E. ttelina, Cb1et of fJ&Uonal ~we Operata:ne S.Ction of '1le 

redual eo..un1oationa Comda1ion, i~ the tollowlQc account of th• .... 1nda Ueaaage": 

, a. About a week '-for• th• attdtck on Pearl 11~ .. col. Gueat, of the 

Otfioe ot the Chief Signal Officer (n&r Department) oell-1 on t:tr. S'-'l1nl 

and requeete-.t the r.c.c.•s a1a18tanc~ 1n U..tening tor a speciel. ~­

t.h8J ..... opect.1ng. It. woul.d " ciVGP S.n tile 11.iclclh of a ,.,... ... language 

a.a breadoaet tJIOm fOQo and wu1di con\aSn the Japanese words uan1ng 

"Jlol"th tlftnd," -~tc 'fJimt;'l$' and titJat ~Jind.e t:r. Sterling waa g1vm e. ll8' 

of \el.ephone ~era to call in ca::• t.his !fflindfJ Ii.asap~ us heftl'd. 'lb• 

Portland llonitc>r Station waa eJalort.«t~ tor ~la m ... age. 

'· the w11'1da lf••ase- wu hMrd at PorUand - int.~ a nbJl'Oadcan - imd was recorded theft.. It wu hl Japanese langt41.ge ... Voice. 

lt. 1ll88 Swaediat-17 Vlatlit.ratecl into the European tona ot ~1\ta Japan• md. t~ to t»iaa~ bt tel.ottpe. 'lh• P.O.~. :·;at.ch Ottlcor called·· 

th• vatoue nuaabua, 1n0luding the U!W'J number, ·::ind d.elivere4 hie mCHap. 

(I\ ... NCeiYed Sn 1*• kq Deput.-nt bl' Lt. Bro\borhoocl, the GT W&Wb 

otn.cer.) 

4. Kr. st.arllna atat.ed \ha~ b.• bad oft• wonclVed u th• ••as• bad 

Pl'O\'ed to be ot ~I
REF ID:A44420 

(Buie Ltr1 co. u. s. la.val Securi'Q' station, J80l Nebraska .t.venue, N.w., 

W&shington 25, D. c., Sera 90, Subj: Jueti.f'ication. tor Marine Securit7 

Fol'C•, dtd 16 Jan 1961) 

lat. Inci Serial: N 0465 

National Security AgenJ4Y1 Fort George G. Meade, Ma.r.rlanci 

B FEl 1961 

TO: Commanding Oi't'ieer, u. s. Naval Security Station, 3801 Nebn.aka 

Avenue, N. w., W'ashington 25, D. c. 

l. BJ' direction o! the NaiJ.ona.l Security Couneil and delcagat.icn of 

auth0rit7 bJ" the Secretar)" o£ De.tMB&, the National Security Apncy is 

taeked. with 1.n&u.ring the necesa&17 degree ot protection of the highly 

sensitive opera:tiona ot this Agency and is charged to u.se established 

facilities and r.sources within the Department ot Defenoe to aceomplish 

thi4 cosaiaeion.. 

2. The Depa.rt.'"lleUt of .Y&v,- ia charged with f'urni:Jhil'lg the Marine 

Security Foree essential to the ut.emal securit,y protection or the ~ 

effort at the Naval Securit7 Station. Any- deviation or reduction in this 

security support. would greatly reduce the e!.tect.i.v-enesa o! the NS.A pro.grams 

and could jeopa.."Y'Qiae th& mssiona of this Agency, which, in turn, could 

a..ttect. rltally the national security • 

.3. The :t"..arine Sec:urity i'<>rce, in support. of the NSA e!!on a.t. the 

Naval Security- Station. a.lso serves as a st.and-by- force !er emergencies 

which require immediate action, and in which tiala -:tel.sys could result. in hi~ aeneitive in.formatJ.on being compromised. In order to aervc 

effectively in this capao"ity, it is eeseatial that t.he Marine Security 

Feree either be billeted on the Sta.tion or a ata.nd-07 shift be on bo&rd 

the Naval Security Station at all tJ.mn. 

cc: DIR .... ~---------«" AG 

Reading Pllit 

OPS 

SEC 

SEC-6 (NBS) 

/s/ L. \-1. FROST 

l. H. FROST 

Vice Admiral, USN 

Diredor 

M/R: Basic ltr stated that during an inspection ot the Raval Security Station b;y the Potomac River Naval Command area Public Works Officer, the 

Marine Barracks were !ound to be unaa.te to the extent that it is not 

economically 11asible to repair the building. As a result. NSS is preparing 

an urgent project for a new barracks which mu.et be justified and has requested 

NSA to aid in the project by forwarding,~tten documentation stating ISA'• 

need tor the perimeter torc~NSS. Coorctμiated with OPS (Lt Col Me6YMeft). 

C.R.ta.umfoot, SEC-i, 3871, 1 FEB 61, jch 

roved for Release b NSA on 10-23-2013 ursuantto E .0. 1352
I 

\ 

• 

l . , 

~L,ID :'A6688 • 

? s'f-Ciil t 

I -- . \ ~ass PTDEX SEEET 

File under 111 o. 

De~artment of State 

~ I 

- . r ~ of Correspondence: 

Memo- for Reaord 

Subject:_ . 

Date 21 .Tu& 48 

Authorization for Issuance of SIOHUAD to the Deitartment of' State 

and the Central Inte~liegnce Agency Fromt 

W. Brann 

To: 

- i 

'C;tassificatlonz 

·SEG~i""°' ' 

-·. ~ Synopsis: 

/ 

'-• 

The previous 

Department of 

of SIGBUAD to 

' gence Agency. 

authorization for issuance of SIGHUAD to the 

State is valid enough to permit further issuance 

both the Department of State and Central IntelliDocument filed under No. 

M-228 SIGHITAD 

• 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

WDGAS Fvrro No. 07 (Rev. 1) 

26 September 1946 S£Cff£f 

- ·' 

I 

' . 

_,
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**825 KA 15-00954** 
PRESENT: PERADOTTO, J.P., CARNI, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND CURRAN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, APPELLANT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KHADIJAH LANE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (JAMES P. MAXWELL OF COUNSEL), FOR APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PHILIP ROTHSCHILD OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), dated April 17, 2015. The order granted the motion of defendant to suppress physical evidence.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed and the indictment is dismissed.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order granting defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence, the People contend that Supreme Court failed to properly credit their witnesses and erred in granting the motion. We reject that contention. “ ‘It is well settled that the suppression court’s credibility determinations and choice between conflicting inferences to be drawn from the proof are granted deference and will not be disturbed unless unsupported by the record’ ” ( People v Sylvester , 129 AD3d 1666, 1667, lv denied 26 NY3d 1092). Here, the court found the testimony of one of the police witnesses to be “unworthy of belief” and therefore concluded that “the People failed to meet the burden of establishing the legality of the police action in the first instance” ( People v Rumph , 199 AD2d 434, 435). We conclude that the court’s credibility determination is supported by the record, and thus we see no basis to disturb it ( see Sylvester , 129 AD3d at 1667).

Contrary to the People’s further contention, the court did not “assume the role of defense counsel.” “A [t]rial [j]udge in a criminal action is not merely an observer nor only a referee. It is the [j]udge’s duty to assume an active role in the examination of witnesses where proper or necessary to elicit or develop significant facts, to clarify or enlighten an issue, or to facilitate or expedite the orderly progress of the trial” ( People v Ellis , 62 AD2d 469, 470). There is no evidence in this record that the court acted improperly; rather, upon review of the hearing transcript, we conclude that the**-2- 825 KA 15-00954** 

court attempted to clarify issues because the police officer’s testimony was confusing and contradictory.

In view of our determination, the indictment must be dismissed because “ ‘the unsuccessful appeal by the People precludes all further prosecution of defendant for the charges contained in the accusatory instrument’ ” ( People v Moxley , 137 AD3d 1655, 1656-1657).

Entered: October 7, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 10.3

 

 

You currently hold vested and/or unvested stock options granted to you under one or more of EQT Corporation’s (“Company’s”) long-term incentive plans. On May 10, 2011, the Compensation Committee approved an amendment to the terms of all of the Company’s outstanding stock options. The amendment provides that, upon an employee’s termination of employment for any reason other than for Cause (as defined below), vested options held on the date of termination remain exercisable for the remaining original term of the options.  Previously such options would have expired upon the optionee’s termination of service.

 

With respect to this amendment, “Cause” is defined as: (a) the conviction of a felony, a crime of moral turpitude or fraud or having committed fraud, misappropriation or embezzlement in connection with the performance of the employee’s duties, (b) willful and repeated failures to substantially perform assigned duties; or (c) a violation of any provision of the applicable stock option award agreement or express significant policies of the Company.  If the Company terminates an employee for Cause, the Company must give written notice to the employee not later than 30 days after such termination.

 

These terms and conditions are now applicable to your outstanding stock options and no further action is required of you at this time.  Please place a copy of this communication with your stock option award agreement(s) and feel free to contact me at (412) 553-[_____] if you have any questions.

 

Thanks

Bill

 

 

Bill Hahn

Executive Compensation Analyst

EQT Corporation

phone: 412-553-[____]

www.eqt.com
REF ID:A66677 

COPYj 

~~llli~~[t 

Serial: 004.09 

15 AUG 1951 

MEMORANDUM FOR 'ffiE CHAIRMAN, STATE-DEFENSE MIUTARY INFORMATION 

CONrliOL COMMITTEE: 

Subject: Release of Cryptographic Material or Equipnent 

to Foreign Governments. 

l. In the past there have been several instances in which 

cryptographic materials or equipnent have been approved for release 

to foreign governments before the Director, Armed Forces Security 

Agency (AFSA), has had an opportunity to comment upon the advisabilit:r or such release. Decisions to release cryptographic materials or equipment should be based on many factors, sane of which 

are highl.:r technical in nature. Within AFSA there is the concentration of sld.lled personnel and technical information required to 

provide the basis for evaluating some of the factors your committee 

must weigh in making its decision. AFSA is therefore equipped. am 

anxious to provide you w.i.th this eervice. 

2. Requests by the Services for the release of cryptographic 

material or equipnent to .f'oreign governments will ordinari~ be 

coordinated with the Director, AFSA, prior to submission to your 

committee. This is not necessarily true of' requests from other 

sources. 'lherefore, it is requested that the comments of the 

Director, AFSA, be solicited before S-DMICC acts upon any request 

for the release of cryptogra~ic material or equipnent to foreign 

governments • 

.3. Aif/f comments you may have on this matter will be 

appreciated. 

RALPH J. CANINE 

Major General, US Arrq 

Director, Armed Forces Security J.8ency 

' 

(STAMP - re not being 

transmitted or revealed 

to unauthorized. person) 

JW Pearson/ded/14 Aug 51 

AFSA-12.3- Ext. 60.354 

COP 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-10-2014 pursuant to E.O.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Ukraine

On March 6, 2014, by Executive Order 13660, I declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of persons that undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets.

On March 16, 2014, I issued Executive Order 13661, which expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660, and found that the actions and policies of the Government of the Russian Federation with respect to Ukraine undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets.

On March 20, 2014, I issued Executive Order 13662, which further expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660, as expanded in scope in Executive Order 13661, and found that the actions and policies of the Government of the Russian Federation, including its purported annexation of Crimea and its use of force in Ukraine, continue to undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets.

On December 19, 2014, I issued Executive Order 13685, to take additional steps to address the Russian occupation of the Crimea region of Ukraine.

The actions and policies addressed in these Executive Orders continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on March 6, 2014, and the measures adopted on that date, on March 16, 2014, on March 20, 2014, and December 19, 2014, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond March 6, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2015-05337

Billing code 3295-F5
REF ID:A66299 ~~--------•---•--

ll:r. 

The 

John 

InatitutG 

von ~ 

~or Advanced Study 

Jtril1ceton University 

Princeton, How J'Grse;y 

Thank you veey n.i.ch tor '¥OlJr letter ot 15 February 

1954. I am 1ure ve v1U all be verr glad to aee 10\1 at 

the next meeti.Dg ot the Bom"d. 1 •bail have travel. orden 

lasued tor 1'QUr ¥11it. 

I Yiah aJ.eo to thank you ror ;you:.t• cairnente vi th 

reprd to ad.d.itiona.l vork thu.t ms to be done in connection with the Mlection ot BOme'b~ to head up~ re1-.rch 

&XJd. dave~nt activities. 

LookiJ.18 forward to eeeUl& ;you, I am 

Sincerel,y, 

191 s ~ cJl cet (__ 

WlLLIAM 7. 1RlEIJ.fAK 

8pec1Al. Aeai1t&nt 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e