alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2088 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2088

To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the process by which 
   a member of the Armed Forces may be referred for a mental health 
                              evaluation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 16, 2021

  Mr. Kelly (for himself, Mr. Cramer, and Mr. Durbin) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 10, United States Code, to improve the process by which 
   a member of the Armed Forces may be referred for a mental health 
                              evaluation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Brandon Act''.

SEC. 2. MANDATORY REFERRAL OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES FOR MENTAL 
              HEALTH EVALUATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 1090a of title 10, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(e) Process Applicable to Member Disclosure.--The regulations 
required by subsection (a) shall--
            ``(1) establish a phrase that enables a member of the armed 
        forces to trigger a referral of the member by a commanding 
        officer or supervisor for a mental health evaluation;
            ``(2) require a commanding officer or supervisor to make 
        such referral as soon as practicable following disclosure by 
        the member to the commanding officer or supervisor of the 
        phrase established under paragraph (1); and
            ``(3) ensure that the process under this subsection 
        protects the confidentiality of the member in a manner similar 
        to the confidentiality provided for members making restricted 
        reports under section 1565b(b) of this title.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (a) of such section is 
amended, in the second sentence, by striking ``subsections (b), (c), 
and (d)'' and inserting ``this section''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 99.3

Certification by Chief Executive Officer of Quarterly Report

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of Zarlink  Semiconductor  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ending  June 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
J.  Brockett,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.    The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.    The information  contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

      Date: August 5, 2003

                                    /s/ PATRICK J. BROCKETT
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Patrick J. Brockett
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to Zarlink  Semiconductor  Inc. and
will be retained by Zarlink  Semiconductor  Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       39
FRIEDMAN MESSAGES FROM LONDON 

MAY 1943
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 8, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 135093 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 135093 

 COA: 271714 
 Wayne CC: 05-009580-01

DESHAWN LEMURAEL STOKES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 11, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d1217 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 8, 2008 

 Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2148 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2148

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prevent an increase 
         in the Medicare part B premium and deductible in 2016.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2015

 Mr. Wyden (for himself, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Brown, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Casey, 
 Mr. Menendez, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Nelson, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Schumer, Mr. 
Sanders, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Carper, Mr. Udall, Ms. Hirono, Mr. 
King, Ms. Mikulski, Mr. Coons, Mr. Franken, and Mr. Merkley) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                               on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to prevent an increase 
         in the Medicare part B premium and deductible in 2016.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Medicare Beneficiaries 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. PREVENTING MEDICARE PART B PREMIUM AND DEDUCTIBLE INCREASES IN 
              2016.

    (a) In General.--Section 1839(a) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395r(a)) is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence of paragraph (1), by striking 
        ``Such'' and inserting ``Subject to paragraph (5), such''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
    ``(5) In applying this part (including subsection (i) and section 
1833(b)), the monthly actuarial rate for enrollees age 65 and over for 
2016 shall be equal to the monthly actuarial rate for such enrollees 
for 2015.''.
    (b) Conforming Funding.--Section 1844(a) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1395w(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; plus''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) a Government contribution equal to, as estimated by 
        the Chief Actuary of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid 
        Services, the reduction in aggregate premiums payable for a 
        month under this part that is attributable to the application 
        of section 1839(a)(5) with respect to--
                    ``(A) enrollees age 65 and over; and
                    ``(B) enrollees under age 65.
In applying paragraph (1), the Government contribution under paragraph 
(4) with respect to enrollees described in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of 
such paragraph (4) shall be treated as premiums payable and deposited 
in the Trust Fund under subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively, of 
paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6440

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT RONALD GIBSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior 

District Judge. (4:06-cr-00146-RGD-TEM-2; 4:14-cv-00150-RGD)

Submitted: June 18, 2015 Decided: June 23, 2015

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Ronald Gibson, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Matthew Hurt, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Ronald Gibson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as 

successive and denying reconsideration. The orders are not 

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate 

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable 

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 

529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Gibson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
3

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
1000 Aviara Parkway, Suite 100, Carlsbad, CA 92011

T 760.431.4200 F 760.454.3869 www.brecommercial.com 

March 21, 2012 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029. 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

My firm, Cassidy Turley, fully supports the application of Alaska Airlines for air service between San 

Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the largest region without direct 

service to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San Diego and 

the nation’s capital, the region generates the largest passenger market demand without nonstop 

service to the convenient and close-in airport serving our nation’s capital. 

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average 

airfares are the highest of west coast cities, should qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. 

The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that 

average about $60 each way. This means travelers between Washington’s city center and San Diego via 

Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one-way. 

There are also countless other San Diego-based and Washington-based businesses that are engaged in 

health science, telecommunications, and national defense that need quick and convenient access to 

Reagan National Airport. Cassidy Turley and our clients have an immediate need for additional nonstop 

air service to our nation’s capital. Alaska Airlines service would add a needed nonstop option to a 

primary gateway to Washington, DC. Cassidy Turley joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport 

Authority, the San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation, the World Trade Center San 

Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for 

San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots. 

We thank the Department of Transportation for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced 

docket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon. 

Sincerely, 

Dennis Visser, SIOR 

Managing Director 

(760) 431.4216 

dvisser@breb.com CA Lic. 01255595
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000266

31-OCT-2019

07:48 AM
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Cuba and of the Emergency Authority Relating to the Regulation of the Anchorage and Movement of Vessels

On March 1, 1996, by Proclamation 6867, a national emergency was declared to address the disturbance or threatened disturbance of international relations caused by the February 24, 1996, destruction by the Cuban government of two unarmed U.S.-registered civilian aircraft in international airspace north of Cuba. On February 26, 2004, by Proclamation 7757, the national emergency was extended and its scope was expanded to deny monetary and material support to the Cuban government. The Cuban government has not demonstrated that it will refrain from the use of excessive force against U.S. vessels or aircraft that may engage in memorial activities or peaceful protest north of Cuba. In addition, the unauthorized entry of any U.S.-registered vessel into Cuban territorial waters continues to be detrimental to the foreign policy of the United States. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing the national emergency with respect to Cuba and the emergency authority relating to the regulation of the anchorage and movement of vessels set out in Proclamation 6867 as amended by Proclamation 7757.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2015-04353

Billing code 3295-F5
--------------

·----• - REF ID: A58 613 • 

Office Memorandum • uN1TEn sTATEs GOVERNMENT 

TO Dr. Bacha, APSA-35 DATB: 6 JIAICB 1951 

PB.OM - APSA-<XYr 

SDBJBCT: Stwb" entitled "Proposals tor the Mechanical Resolutian ot German 

s,nta: Pattenl8" 

1. LCDR Hazelett indicated to • that 70ll bad requested that the paper 

entitled •Propoaal.11 tor the Mechanical Resolution of Geman SJntax Patterns" be 

returned to 7011 tor turther detailed 11f.ad1'. 

2. I am therefore aend1ng 10\l the cop.r which wae forwarded to • 'bJ' _.. Edmund.am. I shall be haPPT to redn the reaulte o£ 101lr more detailed. 

st1KQ', or t.o diacWUI with JOU at 70tJr connn1ence the varioue aspect.a arising 

tran 70Qr anal.pill. 

WILLIAM P. FRIED!WI 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-10-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
' 

REF ID:A7227" 

HEAlXWARTERS ARLINGTON HALL STATION 

SPSIS Jll.5 C, rl Office of the Commanding 0.f'ficer 

Arlington, Virginia • 

SPSIS-2 

.. 10 January 1944 

Subject: Safeguarding Military Information 

- To: All Officers, Arlington Hall Station 

1. Concern has been expressed over the apparent lack of securitymindedness on the part of both military and civilian personnel in War 

Department installations. Persons in uniform are accepted as accredited 

personnel without being required to present creden~ials and without having 

their credentials carefully scrutinized. Guard forces have been f o~nd to be 

lax in some installations. Classified information is divulged to unauthorized persons. 

2. Information can be properly safeguarded only by constant a:id 

continuous "U"igilance on the part of all personnel. The need for security 

must be understood by all concerned; discretion must be used and ext.reme 

care exercised before permitting anyone to have access to or before 

divulging classified information to anyone making such request. Under no 

circumstances should classified information be revealed to anyone unless 

their credentials have been carefully scrutinized and have been found to 

be valid. Credentials can be forged and uniforms can be purchased. 

Telephonic requests that information be made accessible to someone acting 

on behalf of the calling party are worthless unless the receiving 

party can positively iden-00.fy the voice of the calling party and unless 

the courier bears proper credentials. 

J. Nothing short of eternal and untiring effort on the part 0f 

all personnel will insure the security necessary to the conduct of this 

Post. All officers will enforce security as a personal responsibility 

and will see that provisions of AR 380-5 are rigidly adhered to. 

fo·~ W. Pre~n Corderman, 

Colonel, Signal Corps, 

Co ding. 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-24-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       8,719,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,741,372
<PP&E>                                     111,937,851
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,020,048
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,438,024
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,055,825
<BONDS>                                     61,046,628
<COMMON>                                    10,001,247
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 41,008,583
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               119,438,024
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,626,614
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                5,371,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,197,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,053,262
<INCOME-TAX>                                   372,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            681,262
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   681,262
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
SUBJECT: Interrogation Report, DS-616 

TO: S/ASST (Mr. Friedman) FROM: DD/COMSEC DATE:~ $ JAW 1~~5 COMMENT No. 3 . HJStukey/6o426/rwb 

-' 

1. Although DS-616 does not furnish enough details for a definite judg111ent, it 

would not be surprising if the information quoted in Comment No. 1 should prove to be 

valid. Two systems are known which might have provided the basis for the low opinion 

of American codes. 

a. FOX code used by the Constabulary Forces, which we have evaluated as 

insecure in July 1954. (1st Ind to GAS51 413.46, 28 Jun 54; NSA serial 0805, 8 Jul 54) 

b. low-echelon M-209 usage, about wbich we have received many reports of 

insecurities, 

2. From a telephone conversation with Col. C. Helland of ASA, it is understood 

that Constabulary Forces may devise codes of their own which may be insecure. A 

request for details of such cod.es is being sent to ASA. 

3. A series of questions has been forwarded to PROD for passing to NSAEUR, the 

answers to which should clarify the situation .. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-30-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

2 

SECRET·
LANGLOIS HERBARIUM 

PAr. Wm. F. Friedman, 

4000 Lee Blvd., 

Arlington, Va. 

Dear Mr. Friedman, 

•• ,, ~t G!mqoiic ~ttsitg of J\mttica ' 

~u4itt.sfon, lfl. Gt June 21, 1944. 

At the request or Mr • .McGrail, an alumnus or this institution, I am 

sending you two olff-prints of a publication of mine. I hope they will be of use to y-ou. 

Please give one copy to Mr. McGrail it he wishes to have one. 

Sincerely yours, 

o/.tJP!d/: 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-15-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                       2,470,906
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  213,459
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      65,165,400
<DEPRECIATION>                            (42,195,261)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,382,209
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     37,221,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                28,382,209
<SALES>                                      9,771,107
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,162,430
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,093,823
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,446,150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (377,543)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              (215,967)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (593,510)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
## Milliken Chemical Confidential M14008

Beth Trenor May 1, 2015 Page 1 of 1

 Chemical Synthesis and Structure

PMN Material (in blue box above):

Distilled reaction product of Polysiloxanes, Me Hydrogen (unspecified formula) and C 4 H 14 OSi 2 , heavy fraction

. There are multiple chain

- extension specie s , some of which are identified in the reaction scheme above. Primary (> 80%) component ( (CH 4 OSi) n C 4 H 14 OSi 2 ) has molecular weight range 194

– 374 (for n=1

- 4).

And other similar chain extension species (~2%) Plus residual starting material (CAS 3277

- 26

- 7)



### CONFIDENTIAL