alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting. 

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material,                           ( print page 12644)                        and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict SEP.                    

*Date:*                         March 26, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, Suite 2C212, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ramesh Vemuri, Ph.D., Chief, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute On Aging, National Institutes Of Health, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2C-212, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-7700,                         *rv23r@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 4, 2015.

Melanie J. Gray, 

Program Analyst Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-05454 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Cite as 2016 Ark. 409

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Opinion Delivered November 17, 2016

IN RE ARKANSAS ACCESS TO 

JUSTICE COMMISSION

PER CURIAM

Honorable Kim Bridgforth, State District Judge, of Pine Bluff is appointed to the 

Arkansas Access to Justice Commission for a three-year term to expire on October 15, 2019. 

The court thanks Judge Bridgforth for accepting service on this important commission.

Honorable Thomas Smith, Circuit Judge, of Bentonville and Honorable Teresa 

French-Coleman, Circuit Judge, of McGehee are reappointed to the Arkansas Access to 

Justice Commission for terms expiring on October 15, 2019. We thank them for their 

continued service.

We express our gratitude to Judge Vic Harper, whose term has expired, for his years 

of dedicated service to the Arkansas Access to Justice Commission.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 

### 2015

- 3985 Directorate Identifier: 

### 2014

- NM

- 182

- AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement)

Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance)

Work

- hours

(include

access, testing,

and close

- up) Labor

cost

(@$8 5 / h

our) Parts Cost Total Costs

(labor +

parts) Number of

U.S.

Registered

Products Total Cost

for U.S. Fleet



### Inspection 5.0 $ 425.00 $ 425.00 

### 13 $ 5,525.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00



### The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 5,525



### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $

On

- Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection,

replacement) Work

- hours

(include access,

testing, and close

up) Labor cost

(@$85/hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00



### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table

that was assumed or might not be obvious . This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES * NO

* Explanation:

Regu latory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation:

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it a ppropriate to include specific requirements for

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES * NO



### * Explanation 

### :
Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The
      Board
      of Directors


Carver
      Bancorp, Inc.:





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the annual report on Form 10-K
      of
      Carver Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated June 29, 2007 relating
      to the consolidated statements of financial condition of Carver Bancorp, Inc.
      and subsidiaries as of March 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated
      statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income,
      and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended March 31,
      2007, which report appears in the March 31, 2007 annual report on Form 10-K
      of
      Carver Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries.








KPMG
      LLP


New
      York,
      New York


July
      17,
      2007
MEMO 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION COORDINATION 

. FaOD OJ 

3 

4 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

ACl"ION 

NOTE AND 

REllJRN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

Attached is a copy of the SIGFOY case as it would 

appear if issued as a patent. . 

'"~ It must be empha~ized, however, that the ent~re 

application would be available to the publi~ should 

a patent issue. The miscellaneous papers herewith 

should therefore also be inspected including all 

matter indicated as canceled. 

-;- . 1)11" 

\ - l 

1V·'"' 

I 

eclassifi ed and a ro d for rel ea e b SA on 07-23-2014 

FROM NAME OR UTLE DATE 

1-EH~en~c..EB~-~S~t~a~u~f.:!:.f~eru:....:....L.L.:.~~r..-,~::......--115 Aug 57 

ORGANIZATION MD LOCATION TELEPHONE 

NSA Patent Attorne 60
Exhibit 15

Fleming Companies, Inc.
1945 Lakepointe Drive, Box 299013
Lewisville, Texas 75029

We have made a review, in accordance with standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial information
of Fleming Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries for the 12-week
and 28-week periods ended July 8, 2000 and July 10, 1999, as
indicated in our report dated July 26, 2000; because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that
information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is
included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the 12
weeks ended July 8, 2000, is incorporated by reference in
the following:

     (i)    Registration Statement No. 2-98602 (1985 Stock Option
            Plan) on Form S-8;

     (ii)   Registration Statement No. 33-36586 (1990 Fleming Stock
            Option Plan) on Form S-8;

     (iii)  Registration Statement No. 33-56241 (Dividend
            Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-3;

     (iv)   Registration Statement No. 333-11317 (1996 Stock
            Incentive Plan) on Form S-8;

     (v)    Registration Statement No. 333-35703 (Senior
            Subordinated Notes) on Form S-4;

     (vi)   Registration Statement No. 333-28219 (Associate Stock
            Purchase Plan) on Form S-8;

     (vii)  Registration Statement No. 333-80445 (1999 Stock
            Incentive Plan) on Form S-8;

     (viii) Registration Statement No. 333-89375 (Consolidated
            Savings Plus and Stock Ownership Plan) on Form S-8;

     (ix)   Registration Statement No. 333-40660 (Dividend
            Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-3; and

     (x)    Registration Statement No. 333-40670 (2000 Stock
            Incentive Plan) on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant
to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not
considered a part of a registration statement prepared or
certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified
by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of
that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
August 16, 2000
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6528

TYRONE TONY BRADLEY, Petitioner - Appellant,

v. LEROY CARTLEDGE, Acting Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (4:08-cv-00903-DCN)

Submitted: September 18, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Tony Bradley, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Samuel Creighton Waters, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tyrone Tony Bradley seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude Bradley has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
REF ID:A67410 

' I 

' I. 

'·,....__ __ ~ 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-10-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6603

EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ALVAN P. PUGH,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr.,

District Judge. (CA-95-132-2)

Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 25, 1996

Before HALL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edwin Wayne Joyce, Appellant Pro Se. Alvan P. Pugh, GAVIN, COX,

PUGH, GAVIN & GAVIN, Asheboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting his

motion to voluntarily dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action,

but requiring that he pay the filing fee and be represented by an

attorney if he chooses to refile this action. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate

judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Joyce v. Pugh,

No. CA-95-132-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

__ 2010

________ - NM -

____ 249

______ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# For Further Information Contact:

Anyone requiring information regarding the Committee should contact Michael C. Lu, M.D., M.P.H., Executive Secretary, ACIM, Health Resources and Services Administration, Room 18 W, Parklawn Building, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857, telephone: (301) 443-2170.

                        Individuals who are submitting public comments or who have questions regarding the meeting and location should contact David S. de la Cruz, Ph.D., M.P.H., ACIM Designated Federal Official, HRSA, Maternal and Child Health Bureau, telephone: (301) 443-0543, or email:                         *David.delaCruz@hrsa.hhs.gov*.                    

Jackie Painter,

Director, Division of the Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2015-05416 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
-_,. - ~JF-~ ID :A70043 

March 15,. 19~ 

/ 

... -.... 

-.. ~ ~ .. Professor· Allred Hoolmr 

8~. Fae~ ~ Street . 

-~ "!'_ • 

Broolclyn, ~ York 

Dear Professor Heckers 

Receipt of your letter of" March 10, 1• aolcnmrledE8d• 

It ia with much regret that I must advise you 'that I cannot 

make ava.ilablo to you any of .the itecs which you ~eaire in 

connection with your coilduct or jlourses 1n oryptograp'l\Y'. 

These publioationa are intended tor ai'tioia.1 uao on]1' and 

their fiutribution to tho public is prchi'bited. -~ 

Very truly yours, 

W1llimn F. FriedI:an 

Direator ot Comrmmicationa 

Research 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 

.. -a- ., .. -~ 
... _ _ ---------------------------------- ... 

• REF ID:A70043 

ALFRED HECKER 

Lieut. Col. Wm. F. Briedma.n 

War .Deparlbment 

LJarch 10, 1943 

Office of the Chief Signal Corps Officer 

Washington, D. c. 

Dear Col. ~ri~edman: 

I have been conducting courses in Elementary 

-

6rypto~raphy and Cryptanalysis at St. John's University 

in Brooklyn. We have used as basic text, "Elemantary 

Cryptanalysis 11 by Gaines. ..i. number ot students who are 

now completing the course, are interested in further 

study_. I should appreciate it very much, therefore, 

if you could make available to me any papers vil.ich you 

would suggest for advanced work in the field. The 

following would be of pirticular interest !it you could 

help me obtain them: the rliverbank Publications; 

Frequency and ~iathematical Compilations; and methods 

used for attacking messages 'WJ.ich have been enciphered 

via a combination or both substitution and transposition 

systems. 

I thank you for this courtesy.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           816,207
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  5,317,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,133,225
<PP&E>                                       116,115,432
<DEPRECIATION>                                 4,673,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               119,026,552
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          6,570,900
<BONDS>                                       50,995,433
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                          735
<COMMON>                                          63,167
<OTHER-SE>                                    61,396,317
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 119,026,552
<SALES>                                       17,534,220
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              17,612,586
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 11,834,489
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,865,533
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                2,912,464
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            2,912,464
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   2,912,464
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .57


</TABLE>
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 1702

SENY ANE , Petitioner ,

v.

MATTHEW G. WHITAKER , Acting Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : December 12, 2018 Decided: January 3, 2019

Before NIEMEYER, DIAZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied in part, dismissed in part by un published per curiam opinion

.

Melissa J. Mitchell, LAW OFFICES OF PAUL A. SUHR, PLLC, Raleigh, North Carolina , for Petitioner. Joseph H. Hunt, Assistant Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director , Greg D. Mack, Senior Litigation Counsel , Office of Immigration Litigation , UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Seny Ane, a native and citizen of Senegal, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to r eopen as untimely . We

have reviewed the administrative record and the Board’s order and find no abuse of

discretion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c)(2) (2018). We therefore deny the petition for review in part for the reasons stated by the Board. See In r e Ane (B.I.A. May 29, 2018). We lack jurisdiction to review the Board’s refusal to exercise its sua sponte authority to reopen and, therefore, dismiss this portion of the petition for review. See Lawrence v. Lynch , 826 F.3d 198, 206

- 07 (4th Cir. 2016); Mo sere v. Mukasey , 552 F.3d 397, 400

- 01 (4th Cir. 2009) (collecting cases). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED IN PART , DISMISSED IN PART
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2083 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 

Mr. BURR (for himself and Mr. TILLIS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR HYDRO4 ELECTRIC PROJECT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

6 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

7 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En8 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12642, the 

9 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

10 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2083 IS

1 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest require2 ments of that section and the procedures of the Commis3 sion under that section, extend the time period during 

4 which the licensee is required to commence the construc5 tion of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods 

6 from the date of the expiration of the extension originally 

7 issued by the Commission. 

8 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

9 period required for commencement of construction of the 

10 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

11 date of enactment of this Act— 

12 (1) the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

13 may reinstate the license effective as of the date of 

14 the expiration of the license; and 

15 (2) the first extension authorized under sub16 section (a) shall take effect on that expiration date. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EX-23


*       *       *       *       *
 
 Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 The Board of Director and Stockholders
 
 China Lithium Technologies, Inc.
 New York City, New York
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-169807) of China Lithium Technologies, Inc. of our report dated September 23, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements of China Lithium Technologies, Inc., which appear in this Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2011.
 
 /s/ P.C. Liu, CPA, P.C. Pearl Liu, CPA
 
 Flushing, NY
 October 13, 2011