alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID:A487984 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-12-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a 
. __ . , 

• 

REF ID:A487984 

:>:! June 1944 

'.M: • ftfill!DS KF§SAG!" 

tt. Comdr. A. V. Paring, "Gt Watch O.t'fic:•r" in Deceaber 1941 and now 

aemng Sn 2o-G at th• Comunica:t.ion Arma., turniehu th• toll01dng account 

of the "W'Snda Keaaagta." Pering just returned fro• Pearl Harbor and diltcuea.a. the matter with Brotherhood out there. 

l. !he irwinda le.11agett wu intercepted b.r the P .c.c. durin.g th• 

evenlng of December 3 or 1+, 1941· So tar u known to Pering, the Nav never 

heard it. 

2. F.c.o. H~re phoned over to the Hav,r Department, notified 

th• Gr Watch Officer (tt. (jg) Brotherhood) that it had be9n intercepted b7 

the r.c.a. Monitor Station at Portland, Oregon, and gave ilia the wording ot 

th• message. 

3. Per1Dg belleYU that Bl.~berhood reque•t•d 1'1'1tten cmtirmation 

and that P.O.C. amt over a cop7 ct the telet1J.1• m.eaaage received traa 

Portland. Paring belin'ea the or1.ginal "Viinda Meua.gen wu a Voice Broadcaat, although Brotherhood. originally thought :t.t waa in Kone because ot th• 

i:r:tnted tranacript. of th• ••HiJ• ~ch he received. 

4. Pering Md Brotherhood. do not know whether r.c.c. did thie on the:S.J.!' 

own initiative or whether prior arrang•ent• h&d betn 1\\&df). 

j. Brotherhood phoned l:rai.er and other otticere about the ,.Winds 

ll11aage" during the nening it ·was receind:. Pering :relined Brotherhood at 

midnight, but. th• ••H&•,,... not turned over to h1a and h• never 1aw it .. 'Pering beliwea that. Kram.er came down that nening and took the ''Winda 

••••age" with him or else locked it in h11 (GZ) safe. · 

6. Pering knon nothing about the ultUaa.te diepoaition ot ti. GZ tile 

copie1 of the "'Rinde Keaaage, tt and Brotherhood did not. tell bia what he knew 

about it ..
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32(a)
                      18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that
the accompanying Form 10-KSB of Harbor Bankshares Corporation, (the "Company")
for the annual period ended December 31, 2005, fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and that the information contained in this Form 10-KSB
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ Joseph Haskins, Jr.                                       March 8, 2006
---------------------------                                       -------------
Joseph Haskins, Jr.                                                        Date
President and Chief Executive Officer
Joseph Haskins, Jr.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

GUSTAVO A. BASMESON
, Appellant,

v.

MELBA R. BASMESON
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 2568

[ April 23, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Charles E. Burton , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502017DR011822XXXXSB

.

Gustavo A. Basmeson, David, Chiri q ui, Republic of Panam á , pro se.

Jane Kreusler

- Walsh, Rebecca Mercier Vargas and Stephanie L.

Serafin of Kreusler

- Walsh, Vargas & Serafin, P.A., West Palm Beac h, and Jeffery Jones of Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER
, K LINGENSMITH and K UNTZ

, JJ ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
8 

• 

·---

ROUTING SLIP NEYER USll FOR Al'l'ROYALS, DISAl'l'ROY A£Sl.. Of 

CONCVBRENCBS. IJR SIMILAR Ar:TIONS lf." 

INITIAlS 

DATE 

\ 

' I 

' 

CIRCULATE 

CCIDRDll'IA1IOll 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

AC11DN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

DATE 

~~~-lZ..L...l~~~ ........ --11 )"a," TELEPHONE<"/ 

I FEB 'O :him. II. 10 Nov tT. whlllh _,. .: aiid. BQ 

nn 95 llePl•llBIDAAOOl'orm8116.1A .. lllldil 

~ . . . 

' ' 

~ 

, '' , ,,. ,, 

., 

. ~ 

MATERIAL FROM THIS ENVELOPE BAS BEEN PLACED IN FOLDERS 175 - 178 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

NATIONAL.SECURITY AGENCY 

FORT GEORGE G. llEADE, MARYLAND 

310 SecODll Street, S.B. 

Waahillgtm, D.C. 

POSTAGE AND PEES PAID 

DEPARTMENT OP THE ARMY 

,-; . M~'). CL: DC C.HRL~11FH'-J 

• I 

., . 

. , 

' 

-.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDIBERTO ALVAREZ

- LOPEZ, AKA Edilberto Cornelio Alvarez

- Lopez,

Petitioner,

v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 08

- 73168 Agency No. A098

- 389

- 712

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals Submitted April 7, 2015 ** Before: FISHER, TALLMAN, and NGUYEN , Circuit Judges

. Ediberto Alvarez

- Lopez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and pro tection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 15 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 08

- 73168

(“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the IJ’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder , 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009), and we review de novo claims of due pr ocess violations, Colmenar v. INS , 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir.2000)

. We deny the petition for review. Substantial evidence supports the IJ ’s finding that Alvarez

- Lopez’s past experiences in Guatemala with gang members did not rise to the level of persecution. See Nagoulko v. INS , 333 F.3d 1012, 1016

- 18 (9th Cir. 2003) (rec ord did not compel finding of past persecution ) ; see also Prasad v. INS , 47 F.3d 336, 340 (9th Cir. 1995) (“Although a reasonable factfinder could have found [these incidents con stituted] past persecution, we do not believe that a factfinder would be compelled to do so.”) Substantial evidence also supports the IJ ’s finding that Alvarez

- Lopez failed to demonstrate a well

- founded f ear of future persecution.
See Nagoulko , 333 F.3d at 1018 (fear of future harm is too speculative). In light of these conclusions, we reject Alvarez

- Lopez’s due process contention regarding his political opinion. See Lata v. INS , 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir. 2000) (requiring prejudice to prevail on a d ue process challenge). Thus, Alvarez

Lopez’s asylum claim fails.3 08

- 73168

Because Alvarez

- Lopez’s failed to establish eligibility for asylum, his withholding of removal claim necessarily fails. See Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182, 1190 (9th Cir. 2006). Final ly, Alvarez

- Lopez does not make any specific arguments challenging the IJ’s denial of his CAT claim

. See Martinez

- Serrano v. INS , 94 F.3d 1256,
1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 1996) (issues not supported by argument are deemed abandoned).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED .
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-21075) of our report dated July 24, 1998, except
for Note 9 which is dated as of August 25, 1998, appearing in the 1998 Annual
Report to Shareholders of International Network Services which is incorporated
in International Network Services' Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
June 30, 1998. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
on the Financial Statement Schedule, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
San Jose, California
September 24, 1998
CHIEF JUSTICE

ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

GINA M. BENAVIDES

GREGORY T. PERKES

NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

DORIAN E. RAMIREZ NUECES COUNTY COURTH OUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FL OOR

CORPUS C HRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361

- 888

- 0416 (TEL)

361

- 888

- 0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLO OR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 7853 9

956

- 318

- 2405 (TEL)

956

- 318

- 2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa 

# Court of Appeals

Thirteenth District of Texas

October 22, 2015

Hon. Scott M. Ellison

Law Offices Of Scott M. Ellison

410 Peoples Street

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL * Hon. Mark Skurka

District Attorney

901 Leopard Street, Room 205

Corpus Christi, TX 78401

* DELIVERED V IA E

- MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13

- 15

- 00391

- CR

Tr.Ct.No. 13

- CR

- 2552

- B

Style: The State of Texas v. Celestino Vivanco

Enclosed please find the opinion and judgment issued by the Court on this date

.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

c c: 117 th District Court (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

H on. Anne Lorentzen , Nueces County District Clerk (DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)

Hon. J. Rolando Olvera Jr. , Presiding Judge, Fifth Administrative Judicial Region

(DELIVERED VIA E

- MAIL)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 22, 2019

p0522 

# Order

Clerk May 22, 2019

158171

TOWNSHIP OF WILLIAMSTOWN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158171

COA: 337469

Ingham CC: 15

- 000570

- CZ

SANDALWOOD RANCH, LLC, ALEC

KOLENDA, and SARAH KOLENDA,

Defendants

- Appellants,

and

LOVE ADVERTISING, INC.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 7, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

ANDREW K. KWAP,

Appellant,

v.

COUNTY OF CUMBERLAND, NEW JERSEY,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-3814

[October 4, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Edward A. Garrison, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502012CA004772.

Scott Edwards of Scott J. Edwards, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellant.

Richard A. Warren and Scott L. Mendlestein of Falk, Waas, Hernandez, 

Cortina, Solomon & Bonner, P.A., Coral Gables, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, FORST, JJ., and HILAL, JENNIFER, Associate Judge, concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
REF ID:A27376B 

MEMO FOR RECORD 

'!he attached were photographed from the "record of inventions" kept 

by Don Seiler when he ran the Code & Signal Laboratory at the Washington 

Navy Yard. Item /1103 shows a means of controlling the stepping of 

"cryptographic rotors" by sending circuits through a set of 5-point 

"control rotors". Date of conception June 21, 1932. I got these photos 

through Capt. Safford, who told me that Seiler and Navy did nothing 

toward trying out or exploiting Seiler 1 s idea in this case. It is 

important to note in this connection that the date of u.ry conception of 

electric control of stepping of cryptographic rotors (U.S. Pat. App. 

No. 682,096- On M-134-A) is April 23, 1932. 

Seller's invention has some bearing on Rowlett's invention and concept of using rotors in cascade as a key generator; it appears that 

Seiler anticipated Rowlett in that idea., first described in Rowlett's 

paper dated 29 June 1935. See folder on SISDE /Ill - Patent papers on 

SIGABA. 

29 June 1951 

~· ·2:-~ .~. Friedman 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-12-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A27376B 

ORI( !?£CORD· 

OF 

!JoNALIJ W. SEILER. 
• REF ID:A27376B 

vu/) - . 3°1 I 9.3 2-

. 

............. ~-~ ~/ll/tl~ ,#'~~'ft-< ~ 

AAJll:~~,J; 

lr f~Z) ~/~ /9JZ 

~/s--;j 

y 

//4~' z
REF ID:A272877 

h ~ ~ "t~ ~c iJ ~~ .. -~:~._ ~ · ~, ~ (1.q ~~ c..~ .~ 

let&. ~· °'i ~ ~I:-~ ~ ~ ~-

~.~~.~~~.~~·~ ~~ 

~ "' ~II\ · --~....,..... ,11 ri'V""1 '- ··... ..i 

,,.JI~~ ·' 111 ·£~.-. ·--.ti ~ -· ,.,. ~ 

........-. - .,~ -....a_ . 

~· 

-• • · ....__ """'T"""""""~~ ·. £ ~ " ~. 

~~ ~ ~ ' h. ~~. s~.~ 

r:J( ~~~ ~.q··.~ ' 

~ Oo~ ""'tt.--4 \J.... ~ ~-""-•k,,\ ~ ~-

~ -.... .. t ~ ~,,l. cl~ ai.-,.. -r~-............ .0. ~.......... ~ 

~· ~ ... .n~ ~ "T"• • .._,.~ .. ~, o..~~V<·~~,... ...... ) ~ 

~···~. d F\A°~~ /...~ ~ ..-~~Y"'t ~ .. f""'~~ 

~ ~ B ~-.. ~ ~ .. ' av-..-•·--~~·~ 

~ ~ (\i., d44~. ~'-L~~ ·~.,- ~~ j 

~. ~ ~ lAo.41-r . .. ~~ ........ . 

~\ 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-13-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO
ANNUAL REPORT OF
HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
  1.
    
    that the Report fully complies with all requirements of Section
13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and2.
    
    that the information contained in the report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
 March 1, 2010
    
    /s/ John N. Molbeck, Jr.(Date)
    
    John N. Molbeck, Jr.,President and Chief Executive OfficerMarch 1, 2010
    
    /s/ William T. Whamond(Date)
    
    William T. Whamond,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,324
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,638
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    104,789
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               137,513
<PP&E>                                         187,510
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 387,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           98,197
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     183,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   387,135
<SALES>                                        839,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               839,622
<CGS>                                          624,818
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  624,818
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               210,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,718
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,815)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (438)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,377)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,377)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)
        

</TABLE>
t!t!' 'ftfB UJII'!P.D 8".PA!'BS PA'!Rft Ol'P lOI 

In re ~ppl1o~\1on ot 

V:Ulia::l 1. ?rienrmn. et al., 

Serial !'lo. &88 1 364, rtle4 

Januar7 23, l9S! 

OrJPiographtc SJ•tea 

D1•1s1on 16, Rooa 1612 

Ion. OOBlliH1oner ot Patem1, 

Sirr 

Ola in• 33 ancl e1 are oamell•d wUbou'\ preJwlice • 

It 11 noied tbai olala 31 •• N1&n4ed, 1• oon114ered Allowable 

tha" '\hie applicaUon be pneM4 to line ae earl7 ae poHlble. 

wnu .. JI'. ?rlect.a, •. , al 

• 

· JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 04315**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  04315\04315_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 04315\04315_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

04315\Certification Statement Plant ID 04315.pdf Plant certification statement x 04315\Supplemental Documents\04315_lovett icr package.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 04315\04315_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04315\04315_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 32.1

           CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  of  Foamex  L.P.  and  Foamex  Capital
Corporation  on Form 10-K for the period ended January 2, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Thomas
E.  Chorman,   Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Foamex  L.P.  and  Foamex  Capital
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of Foamex L.P.
     and Foamex Capital Corporation.

Foamex L.P.                                      Foamex Capital Corporation



/s/ Thomas E. Chorman                            /s/ Thomas E. Chorman
------------------------------------             -------------------------------
Thomas E. Chorman                                Thomas E. Chorman
President Chief Executive Officer                President
April 4, 2005
J-S39010-16

*Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court.

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION – SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

 Appellee

 v.

MILTON RAY FRISBIE,

 Appellant

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

 No. 1389 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence entered July 2, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Bradford County

Criminal Division at No: CP-08-CR-0000864-2014

BEFORE: STABILE, PLATT,* and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

CONCURRING STATEMENT BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED JULY 25, 2016

Section 9754 of the Sentencing Code requires that conditions of 

probation be reasonable. See 42 Pa.C.S. § 9754(b) (“The court shall attach 

such of the reasonable conditions authorized by subsection (c) of this section 

as it deems necessary to insure or assist the defendant in leading a lawabiding life.”); id. § 9754(c)(13) (“The court may as a condition of its order 

require the defendant[ t]o satisfy any other conditions reasonably related to 

the rehabilitation of the defendant and not unduly restrictive of his liberty or 

incompatible with his freedom of conscience.”). Had this Court been writing 

on a clean slate herein, I would find that the lower court’s condition 

forbidding Appellant to have any contact, as opposed to unsupervised 

contact, with any person under the age of eighteen during the term of his 

probation to be unreasonable. Nevertheless, in light of Commonwealth v. 
J-S39010-16

- 2 -

Reggie, 399 A.2d 1125, 1126 (Pa. Super. 1979), wherein this Court found a 

condition of probation requiring a defendant “to keep away from juveniles 

and young adults” to be reasonable, I respectfully concur.
ABATED and Opinion Filed July 2, 2021

In the 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05
- 18
- 00360
- CR DEMOND DEPREE BLUNTSON , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the 49th District Court Webb County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012CRO000674D1 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Molberg, Carlyle, and Smith 1 Opinion by Justice Carlyle A jury convicted Demond Depree Bluntson o f two counts of capital murder and two counts of aggravated assault against a public servant. The trial court sentenced him to de ath for the capital

- murder conviction s , and the jury sentenced him to fifty years’ confinement for the aggravated

- assault conviction s . T he capital

murder conviction s went direc tly to the court of criminal appeals for review , even though the four counts were tried to the same jury

. See Callins v. State , 726 S.W.2d

1 The Honorable Justice Craig Smith succeeded the Honorable Justice John G. Browning, a member of the original panel. Justice Smith has reviewed the briefs and the record before the Court.– 2

–

555 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986); T EX
. C ODE C RIM
. P ROC
. art s . 4.04, 37 .071 § 2(h); T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(b). 2
W ith one exception , Mr. Bluntson ’s fifteen points of error overlap with issues he asserted in his capital

- murder appeal

. In both appeals, Mr. Bluntson contends the trial court violated his rights in determining he was competent t o stand trial. The court of criminal appeals, addressing Mr. Bluntson’s arguments, has held that the trial court erred by failing to conduct a competency trial despite determining there was some evidence of incompetency

. See Bluntson v. State , No. AP

- 77,067, 2021
WL 2677462 , at * 6 (Tex. Crim. App. June 30, 2021) (not designated for publication). The court abated Mr. Bluntson’s appeal and remanded the case to the trial court to determine the feasibility of conducting a retro spective competency trial. See id. Given that Mr. Bluntson makes the same argument in this court, and for the reasons the court of criminal appeals explained in its opinion, we abate this appeal pending the trial court’s proceedings on remand from the court of criminal appeals

. As the court of criminal appeals ord ered, see id. , r egardless of the trial court’s determination on the feasibility of a retrospective competency trial, the record of the proceedings on remand shall be filed in this Court within 180 days of the date of this opinion for reinstatement of the a ppeal.

2 Mr. Bluntson did not timely appeal his aggravated

- assault convict ions, though the court of criminal appeals granted him permission to note his out

- of

- time appeal in this Court.– 3

–

180360f.u05 Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47.2(b) /Cory L. Carlyle/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE