alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
e REF ID :A272573. 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE JUDGE ADVOCATE GENERAL 

WASHINGTON 25, O, C. 

Mr. William F. Friedman 

1823 Que Street, N.W. 

Washington 9, D. c. 

Dear Sir: 

By direction of The ~iudge Advocate General, receipt is acknowledged 

of your letter to the Secretary of War dated 5 June 1947, tendering to 

the Government of the United States for its use, under the provisions 

of the act of October 6, 1917, as amended (35 u.s.c. 42), the invention 

described and claimed in your application for patent, Serial No. 682,096, 

filed 25 July 1933, for Cryptographic System, whioh application and the 

invention covered thereby were placed in secrecy by the Commissioner ot 

Patents on 14 May 1947. It is noted that your letter includes a power 

to inspect and make copies of the application. 

The records of this office show that the above-mentioned application and the invention covered thereby are assigned to the United States 

Government and were filed under the aot of March 3, 1883, as am.ended 

(35 u.s.c. 45). However, the present tender will be made of record 

for the protection of whatever interest you may have in this invention. 

Very truly yours, 

/. 

/ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-13-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 0 A1 30 9 . FANNI E MCCORD BI VENS v . S & A PALM, LLC.

Th e ap pel l an t i n t h i s cas e fai l ed t o co m p l y wi t h t he n o ti ce o f d o ck et i n g m ai l ed

b y t hi s Co u rt an d wi t h Co u rt o f Ap p e a l s R u l e 2 3 (a), reg ard i n g t h e fi l i n g o f an

en u m erat i o n o f erro rs an d bri ef wi t hi n 2 0 d ay s aft er th e ap pea l w a s d o c k e t ed

. See

al s o Co u rt o f Ap p eal s Ru le 1 3

. Acco rd i ng l y , t hi s ap peal i s D ISM IS SED. Th e cl erk i s h ereb y DIRECTED to

t ran s m i t n o t i ce o f t h i s o rd er t o t h e ap p el l an t.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. March 05, 2020

03/05/2020
Receivin,g 

Amp. 

. . Impress1n.g 

M~nets 

3 

REF ID:A105066 

INPUTt-------1----- AMP. 1 

____ I_m......_res__,si_, Mo9nets 

0 C B 

Impressln9 

Ma~ne+s 

A 

Reading 

Ma9ne=t.s 

Readin_g 

Ma,n81S 

2 

Input 

c· 

r----------1 Output 

Mod. 

Schematic Re~resentation 

of Operation '?r ''s~stem """ 

Mea11Sfot" et1c1pherin.9 and 

Decipher-in,g M a9neti cal~ 

Recorded Si9na Is ';' Invented 

M ~ 12,193fJ b!J: 

11)'~~~~ 

/~~~ c;,p., 7·~. 

)..,.~t.. ~ 

"W\eu.a ~ a, ''a' 

4 

Amp. Output :>"~II f'lf..S1 ~-v1 ltf,,,s.(J.e 

.]) uic.R r-fA el t; ~ 1'Yl-~ >-3, '13~ ati~~~ @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a Str l!Jf Alw IA/~.9JC. 
Receivi n,g 

Amp. 

REF ID:A105066 

INPUTt-------1-------, 

AMP. Im ressi~ 1'109nets t----__._--, 

D C B A 

Impress1n9 Read in~ 

~~~ fles 

H G F E D c 

H G F E D 

H G F E 

H G F 

RecuJin_g 

Ma,ne1s 

2. 

B A 

c B A 

D & B 

E c 

r{d Input 

D C' 

l. 

i 

-----------t Output 

Mod. 

A 

B A 

Schematic ReP.resentation 

of Operation'!! ''S_ysiemand 

Mea11S for e11c1pher"i11.9 and 

Decipherin,g Ma9netica\tyRe.cotdecJ Si9nals ';' lnvehtecJ 

M ~ 12,19.% b!j: I <ttYAc.~~~~ -_ -?/ ... J ,..,.....,,...._d_A __ _ 

4 Amp. Output 

,-

..J 
L., 

r: .":' .. -··· 

REF ID:A105066 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER I WASHINGTON 

Me,J- 2S, 1936 

llDI01WWJI( 7JR1 leaearoh ar.d Df!YeloJ11ont D1 v1a1on 

(!Hf1U• War Plans &: Traintna J>i:r1a10D) 

l. !here are forwarded here•ith two sketches and brief' ~lsnation ot a •81'atem and Means tor !nctpherin,g and Deciphering 

lagneUcalq...Jocorded Sipa.la", which 111 the joint invention ot the· 

un4era1gne4. 

z. Some doubt. has been upreasfKI with reprd to the Yal1d1.'t.1' 

or the ba:sic aaaumptions u.;len which the idea• •'bodied 1.n the 1y11tu 

nilw rest. It is underatood that 11%·. w. n. Berahber1er or the Signal Corpa Laborator1ea at 1ort Molt:louth has ms4e rather extensive 1nvestipt101u1 in the tield in which tb1a w.r•tu falls and that he 1• 

expected to be 1n lrashtn&ton in. the near 1"utare. .l co1tf'erece with 

hia on tb1s subJaet would be J80&t d&aix'•bl."- and it. 1a r9queated that 

this be arr&Aged £or, 1f practicable. 

3.. tt th.a. qatea turns out to be theor6~1e~ eound. 1n pruciple, it ls deaired that patent application be filed thereon. 

.lttachedf 

ho Jltetchea. 

Harrod G., lliller11 

Captain, 8:1.gn&l Oox·pa. 

liUia.11 'I', :Friedman •
EXHIBIT 23.1









         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
         Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-38754) and Form S-8 (No. 33-88268,  No.
         33-73944,  No.  333-18877,  No. 33-95256 and No.  33-97250) of Uniroyal
         Technology Corporation of our reports dated December 5, 2000, appearing
         in the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Uniroyal  Technology  Corporation
         for the year ended October 1, 2000.

         DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP


         Tampa, Florida
         December 12, 2000
FI L ED U.S. COURT OF A P P E A LS E LE V E N T H C IR C U IT SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 THOMAS K. KAH

N CL ERK [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UN ITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE EL EV EN TH CIRC UI T

N o. 04- 1414 0 Non-A rgum ent Calendar

D. C. Docket N o. 03-61689 -CV -JIC MEDIANET OF SOUTH FLO RIDA, INC., Pl ai nt iff -Ap pe ll an t,

ve rs us CITY OF MIR AMAR, Defen da nt -Ap pe ll ee.

Appeal f rom the United State s District Court for the Southern D istrict of Florida (S ep te m be r 29, 200 5) Be fo re T JO FL A T , BI RC H a nd B A RK E T T , Ci rc uit Jud ge s.

PE R CU RIA M: W e ag re e w ith the dis tr ic t c our t t ha t t his c as e is c ont ro lle d by Co ra l S pr ing s2

Stree t Sy stem s, I nc. V . C ity of Sunrise, 371 F.3d 1320 (11th Cir. 2004), and that ap pe lle e is e nti tle d to sum m ar y j udgm en t. AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTER
ENDING JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             306
<SECURITIES>                                        24
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,127
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (253)
<INVENTORY>                                      4,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,810
<PP&E>                                          14,626
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,169)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,208
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,023
<BONDS>                                          5,321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            43
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,251
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,208
<SALES>                                         12,409
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,524
<CGS>                                            9,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   253
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 411
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    122
<INCOME-TAX>                                         5
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                108
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       108
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
#### McCormick vs. Ketchum, imp.

*January 17*

February *8, 1881.*

Trial. *(1) Legal or equitable action? Waiver of right to reference. (2) Separate trial of counterclaim by court. (3) Appeal not frivolous.*

1. Complaint for work and labPr. Answer: (1) A denial of the alleged value of such labor. (2) A set-off for'goods, etc, (3) A counterclaim, alleging that plaintiff had been a confidential clerk, etc., of defendants, and had received large sums of money to be expended in their business, for which he refuses to account, or to deliver up the books, etc. Defendants’ motion to refer the cause for trial (a.s one in equity) being denied, they withdrew the counterclaim, and took part in a trial by jury. *Held,*that the action was at law; that under sec. 2864, R. S., a reference was discretionary with the court; and that, if otherwise, the objection was waived.

2. Whether, if the counterclaim had not been withdrawn, the court should have proceeded at the proper time to determine the matters embraced therein, not here decided.

3. An appeal by defendant raising the questions here considered, *held*not frivolous.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Portage*County.

The cause was submitted on the brief of *Patchin <& Weed*as attorneys, with *Q-. W.*Gate, of counsel, for the appellant, and that of *Webb & Cochran*for the respondent.

Oetoh, J.

The complaint is for work and labor, and the answer is, *first,*that such work and labor was not worth the sum alleged; secondly, a set-off for goods, wares and merchandise, and money, and for board; and thirdly, as a counterclaim, that the plaintiff has been the confidential clerk and book-keeper of the defendants, and as such has received large sums of money to be expended in their business, for which he has not accounted, and refuses to so account or to. deliver up the books and papers. The learned counsel for the defendants moved that the case be referred, because it was a case in equity. The motion was overruled, and then the counterclaim was withdrawn, and the cause was tried by a jury, the 'counsel for the *324defendants appearing and cross-examining the witnesses of the plaintiff.

*First.*The plaintiff had the right to have his case tried by a jury, it being an action at law. *Secondly.*The reference of the cause was discretionary with the court. Section 2864, R. S. *Thirdly.*The irregularity, if any, was waived by withdrawing the counterclaim, and submitting the case to a trial by jury. If the counterclaim had remained in the case, the circuit court, at the proper time, might have determined the matters embraced in it without a jury; but whether it would have been proper or necessary for the court to have so disposed of the matter of the counterclaim, we do not decide, because the question is not before us.

We cannot say that this appeal is frivolous, and therefore deny the request of the counsel of the respondent for damages and .double costs. *Northwestern Mutual Life Ins. Co. v.*Starkweather, 40 Wis., 341.

*By the Court.*— -The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
IN REPLY REFER TO • WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

March 23, 1936 

JllDIORANJUI FOR R. A D. D:Lv. 'l"hru W-. P. Ii T. DiT• 

8 

1-. 'l'here are being tornrdad herewith draft specific~tions 

and drawings coyering a proposed modification ot Converter Type 

M-1341'2, with the -request that patent application be tiled 

thereon in mj nmiut· tor· aas:lgmMmt to the War D9pa.rtment. 

2. · The proposed modification should be considered in connection with further developnental work to be done on this 

machine by the Signal Corps laboratories at Fort llonmouth 

when tunds become available thereto~ on July 1, 1936. 

Attached• 

Specitications and drawings. 

1st Memo Ind. 8 

OCSigO, War Plans & Training Division, March 25, 1936 - To: Research 

and Development Division. 

Forwarded. 

31-- .-. } o\.:::> 

W.3.~ \'~ • S. Rumbough, 

Major, Signal Corps • 

. r:tli/ ·~·,, I::;.~· ':= ,· ,. :~. 
.. : .·.-:·.:· . .-:·:: 

. : ... ~ ·'. · .. ; 

.•. 

.. ,.---.·.......--

r • ."' 

--·· - REF ID:A521705 

... 1..' 

--~•.roa 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

·~-~- ,.;~-·:r - ... i_,.., l\.., . I .• ,.. ·~· '•'' • .. ~ ..:•:.o-UiFlPClll a int.. 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

8 

1... !here are llelDg tonanlad berwi\ll draft •PMlts.edlOllll 

and clra1ap 4lnwillg a prepo ... llOditication of eoa.er&er Type 

l. Jl-134r211 td.t;Jt Use reqaen ti.lat patent appl.1-atlon • fl.lacl 

thel"80B :ln., w tor ualpmm& \o the War DIJl&ri-'• 

2. The ,...,. •• moclitieation should '8 conaiclerecl ill eonaaatlon with hrtll8l" clnalopaemal nrll: to 'be dou on th1a 

maebine by the Sigal Corpe la'llo:ratori• at J"ori llomaout.b. 

•hell f'mlda •- aftilalala therefor on 3uly 1, 1931. 

'11111am r. 11"1.._n. 

Attaehed1 

Speoit1oations aad drawinp. 

' 

lst Memo Ind. s . . 

OCSJ.gO, War Plans & Training Division, Karch 25, 1936 - To: Research 

and Development· Div1s1on • 

.Forwarded. 

a. s. Rumbaugh, 

MaJor, Signal Cor?S• 
.: .............. :··.·.:=· .•. : 

-- ---- -...---.......... ~ .. -·-;- . -

COrit.IDENTIAL 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

.... 23, 193' 

R. I D. DlYe ftna W. P. I T. Di.Te 

8 

le: Tb.ere are 'being torwanlecl b.er-1t.h draft epecd.noatlou 

an4 diainp oonring a proposed mod1f1aation of Coa·rerler Type 

Ll3Cl'.21 witJt tile nqu•t tllat patent application be filed 

thereon in my 11811• ror u•~-' to tile Yiar Dapanmen .. 

z. The proposed :modit1cat1on should be conaiderecl 111 coz.-

naction with tvther clnalopn.elltal 'lfOrk to be done on this 

maehine by tbe Signal Corps laboratoriea at J'ort llomouth 

when f'unda 'bec8118 a98ilable therefor on July 11 1936. 

ftlliam ., • Frieclm a. 

Atitachecl 1 

Specifications and dn.winp. 

lat aeao Ind. 3 

OCSigO, War Plans & Training Division, March 25, 1936 - Toi Research 

and DeYelo.i:-ent Di vision. 

J'ornrded. 

*· s. Ruabough, lajor, Signal cor,a. 

CONFIDENTIAL.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                Exhibit 10.1.4.a

The Company's Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement with Dr. Raj Reddy,
originally scheduled to expire October 17, 1993, was previously extended for an
additional five year term ending October 17, 1998 at the same $14.625 exercise
price per share at which the option was originally granted. On September 15,
1998, the option agreement was further extended to an expiration date of October
17, 2003 while continuing the original exercise price. On September 22, 1999,
the option agreement was further amended to permit the exercise of the option
for a period of three years from the date Dr. Reddy ceases to be a director of
the Company, without any distinction as to whether that occurs by reason of
death, disability or otherwise. On January 18, 2000, the option agreement was
further amended to permit the transfer of the option, in whole or any part, to
the same extent and on and subject to the same terms and conditions, and the
exercise of any transferred portion thereof by the transferee, as if the option
were one granted under the Company's 1990 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee
Directors as in effect from time to time.
#### Bruce Barnes et al., Appellants, v Cathers and Dembrosky et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

[771 NYS2d 895]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered September 24, 2003, which denied plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate this action with another action pending in New York County, entitled *Cathers v Barnes*(Index No. 600214/02), unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The two actions are at completely different stages of discovery. Consolidation would result in undue delay in the resolution of the *Cathers*action (see *Abrams v Port Auth. Trans-Hudson Corp.,*1 AD3d 118 [2003]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan and Friedman, JJ.
• REF ID: A36256. 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

HEADQUARTERS, SERVICES OF SUPPLY 

8PSLQ • Legal Paten\a OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

P'J"1-.n f& JauboJ>gD9 WASHINGTON, D. C. 

SPSLO-.)a 

18 October 1943 

JD".•· r. hi. ... n, 

S1pal SChoel, 

400 LM 8oul.nard, 

Ar~.~. 

Ret u. s. Pat.ent Appli•ticnw 

Prl.edlun and Maubor~ S. N. 478,868 

Fr19dmul s. N. 478,19.) 

Incloaed tind cepi .. ot u. s. Patent attic. act.iona 

d&t.ed 16 oet.ebv 1943 nlat.i.Dg t.o the abow applloaUona. 

s. •· 478,868 hu M.a plaC.S ud9I- the t.br...,..r pre- ruiona ot JS u. s. c. 37 eo that an a.m-nt aq be tiled at 

mv t.1.M prior to 16 on.b9r 1946. 

)1l'OT1at.ou 

s. 

et 

1. 

JS 

478,19.3 

u. s. 

bu 

c. 37. 

DOt been 

lotion 

placed 

t.o do 

under 

t.h.1• u 

the 

be1Dg 

~ 

l.Uldel"-

'-km• rn will be not.11'1ed whm tbia i• acoeapl18bed. 

Donald 1. rJ.ppJ.noett., 

Uwt. Colonel, Sipal Corp11, 

Pa\ent.11.and Inft!ltiOllll Counael, IAgal DJ.Yiltion. 

a rnci. - 1-cy l'r dd 1.6 Oct 4.3 

2-C7 1 tr dd 16 Oct 43 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
e REF ID:A67685 • 

. , 

. 

1. This is to record the details of an agreement entered 

into on October 20, 1943 between William F. Friedman, party or 

the first part, and Leo Rosen, party or the second part, with 

regard to the development and commercial exploitation of an 

invention by the party of the first part of a device for authenticating messages dealing with the telegraphic transfer of funds 

by and among banking and brokerage firms. 

2. The basic principles and ideas involved in the invention 

originated with the party of the first part. For this reason 

and because his favorable connections with the firms likely to 

be interested in the invention and/or in the manufacture, purchase, sale, or use of device(s) resulting therefrom, place him in a 

good position to undertake the promotion of the invention, it is 

agreed tqat his interest in this joint venture is 75~ of all 

moneys which may derive from the joint venture. 

3. It is agreed that the party of the second part will construct the necessary model or models in his own shop, using his 

tools and facilities. He will endeavor to reduce the·basic 

ideas of the invention to practice, and it is further agreed that 

any 4nd all improvements or modifications which may arise from 

his ideas or work in connection with the development and which 

may be incorporated in the model or models will become part or 

the whole pool of ideas to be embodied in the patent application covering the invention. In view or the foregoing, it is agreed that his interest in this joint venture is 25~ of all moneys which 

may derive therefrom. 

4. The cost of all materials which may be purchased tor the 

construction of model or models and all other expenditures jointly deemed necessary for the exploitation or the invention, and7or 

its protection and/or its exploitation will be shared pro rata, 

in accordance with their respective interests. No charge for 

the time and/or services of either party will be made in 

establishing the costs or the development and/or exploitation. However, the cost or such travel and traveling expenses jointly deemed necessary for the promotion or the invention will be 

chargeable to the promotion costs and will be shared on the pro 

rata basis mentioned. 

5. It is agreed that the invention will first be processed through the normal Signal Corps and War Department Channels before 

any steps will be taken with a view toward commercial exploitation. 

~~~ a/J.•••o •"-._. 

Washington, D.C. 

October 22, 1943 

~ 

William F. Flie n 

Leo Rosen 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-06-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 218 

To facilitate emergency medical services personnel training and certification 

curriculums for veterans. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 21, 2015 

Mr. ENZI (for himself and Ms. KLOBUCHAR) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To facilitate emergency medical services personnel training 

and certification curriculums for veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans to Para5 medics Transition Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANTS FOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES PER7 SONNEL TRAINING FOR VETERANS. 

8 Section 330J(c) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

9 U.S.C. 254c–15(c)) is amended— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 218 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (8), by striking the period and 

4 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(9) furnish coursework and training to vet7 erans to enable such veterans to satisfy emergency 

8 medical services personnel certification requirements, 

9 as determined by the appropriate State regulatory 

10 entity, except that in providing such coursework and 

11 training, such entity shall take into account previous 

12 medical coursework and training received when such 

13 veterans were members of the Armed Forces on ac14 tive duty.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
DD FllM 95 RaplaCllllDAAOOJi'ol'mllll6,1Aprt8,andAl'BQ I FEB 60 I'-12o JO Nov t7, whlcb lllQ Ill Ullld. 

CIRCUUTE 

COORDINATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

ACFION 

NOTE AND 

RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 
... 

C:.t)~'} (JI'"' : ·-, ~ 1 

RE-F~D:A58599 J 

~ .. .• - EFOP SECRETJ1$) .' .. -~--· • . , Date: About 7 Jan 52 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 
_;.RE~-.~F~I~-D~, :~;R~-~·8~5g9~9=-. _:-...,J..ri-iJ-. 

Efei::. ~Eei::.E;;i;;"<;4 A ( J ,r ... ·, • ----... ·----i_ L '-F s R Trr?'r W" ' 

t -· 

The present status of Greek and Turkish adherence to NATO is as follows: 

At the NATO meeting in Ottawa which wok place in October 1951, the Council 

of Foreign Ministers agreed to present to their respective Parliaments a 

protocol for the adherence of these two states to NATO. So far, only the 

British Parliament has ratified this protocol which must be ratified by all 

the Parliaments before an invitation can be sent to Greece and Turkey. Once 

this invitation.has been sent out by the US Government, the Greek and Turkish 

Governments must ratify it, thereby completing the act of accession. 

-fgp GECRETf!'.;d~ t 
REF ID:A58599 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 )