alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID:A39712 

\.. 

IN THE UNITED STA~ PA'!t:NT OFFICE 

In re epplicat1on ot 

W.F. Friedman et el., 

Serial No. 70,412, 

Filed MArch 23, 1936, 

Crn>togrepha 

Hon. Commissioner ot Patents, 

Sir: 

Div. 53, Room 6897 

April 28, 1939. 

Attention is celled to the feet thot this epplier.tion has beeDt 

placed under the provisions ot Section 4894, Revised Statutes, ea amended, 

u.s.c., title 35, section 37, end it is desired th~t thF.! application be 

continued under the pronsions or said section tor a turtber period ot 

thme years, bearing in mind that the three yeer period will expire in the 

present case on 1une 24, 1939. Reference is made in this connection ot 

the formal notification ot March 29, 1939. 

In contormi t7 with the requirements ot Section 4894, there is 

tiled barewi th a lett81' from the Secretary or War dated April 24. 1939, 

requesting that the applica r.ion be continued under the three year rule. 

Reterf!!nce is made by wa1 ot response to the of,'f'ici.al oonrnW!lica- ··· 

tion of 1une 24, 1936. It is noted that division hes been required in this 

case. It is requested that the requirement for division be waived tor reason• 

hereinafter set torth: 

Thia appli~ation has been tiled under the Act of 1883, ea 

amended, April 30, 19281 and apart trom the tact that the trenater ot t1 tle 

to the Government was made when in"IOking Seot1cm '894, the case hae the 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
... I 

REF ID:A39712 

. ., 

usual status under the No-Pee Act. The application has been prepared et 

Go'fermaent spense and, tollowing the customary proaedure. no tee• are 

paid to the Patent Office ln such cases. It divisional applications should 

be required, the Government would be put to additional expense 8Jld an 

additional burden wou~d be placed on the Patent Oftice for eu,y d1via1ona1 

application or applications which might be :tiled and without ocmpenaatioa 

theretor. Moreover, the War Department would be put to additional expense 

incident to the preparetion ot separate or divisional eppl1cationa. 

Based upon the :nal1ng of the Clasa1t1cat1on Examiner, alll 

also upon an unpublished COmmlas10.n&1r's Order mentioned in Ottice Aot1oa 

ot April a, 193e, (see Butler application, Ser. Ho. D'13,011, Div. 18 ). 

which governs the practice in Government case• falling in this cetegor,r, it 

la requested in the present case that the d1v1aioDSl requirement be wet...,. 

2 

Respectfully submitted. 

W.F. l!'l'iedmlm et al., 

B11 

Attorney 

-
Via Email 

18 August 2014 

Mr. Joseph Sopata 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

William Jefferson Clinton Building 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Mail Code: 6405J 

Washington, DC 20460 

1220 L Street, Northwest 

Washington, DC 20005-4070 

Tel: 202-682-8479 

Fax: 202-682-8051 

E-mail: lax@api.org 

David H. Lax 

Scientific Advisor 

Re: Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emissions and Fuel 

Standards" Performance-based Analytical Test Method Approach {Regulatory Text and 

Preamble) 79 Federal Register 23633- 23640, 23577- 23589 (April 28, 2014) 

Dear Mr. Sopata, 

The American Petroleum Institute (API) has reviewed the requirements of the Performancebased Analytical Test Method Approach (PBMS) as discussed and promulgated in the 

referenced Tier 3 regulation. The attached document summarizes a number of topics for which 

we are seeking technical clarification of the requirements embodied in the regulatory text. It 

also offers a number of suggested editorial corrections in both the regulatory text and the 

preamble relating to the PBMS. 

Please do not hesitate to let us know if you have any comments or questions concerning the 

attached submittal. 

Sincerely, 

ff~ CcV\._ 

David H. Lax 

att./ 

cc: API Test Methodologies Work Group 

An equal opportunity employer
REF ID:A69665 

?IJA Spec1al Moating 

Chiefs ot statt 11.anents SEC ~t 19SS 

and ot HaJor Operating Elements Capt; Jr/i.o~c~Bi.mett/6f1J46/ctt 

l. In addition to RSA Hegulation 10-6, 10 Kq 1955. the to11ow.lng procedures will govern the BSA 8pec1al Meeti1ng to be held at the Arlington Rall Post fheater 

an 23 Avguat 1955· 

a. Personml are urged to arrive at the theater prior to 1025 hrs am 

wlll mt be pmnit.ted to congest in front of tbe entrances. AU personnel v.lll be 

required to have their idenb1t1cation checked before mtering. Sip w11l be posted 

at the var1oua entrances indicating entranoa to be used. 

b. Pour entrances Wlll be used £or in&rese-t• are located 1D the front 

of the theater and tw are loc4ecl on the aid• of the 1ob.. Die tour ermrancea 

are bl'Okan ckM1 as .tol.l.OMB. A thru C vill use the lobW' mtrance ~acent to the 

roads D tbru J w11l •e the left ant.ranee at. the frant 'ot the theater; I thru Q vlll 

U&IEI the right entrance at the .t'ron't or the theater encl R thru Z w11l me the lobbJ' 

entrance nearest the tannia courts. (Sae sketab below) 

. , 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

'\
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JAMES LEWIS MOORE,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 445 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of February, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
Exhibit24.4

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALLMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes andappoints each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or either ofthem, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact andagent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, place andstead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLONCONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation oron behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of theCorporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including thispower of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and anyapplicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has signed these presents this 8th day of March, 2005.

|  | /s/ EDWARD J.LANDAU                   EDWARD J.LANDAU |
|--|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41648

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUAN ALBERTO QUELIS, also known as Juan Quelis,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:15-CR-137-1

Before DAVIS, SOUTHWICK, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney retained to represent Juan Alberto Quelis has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Quelis has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant 

portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Quelis’s response. We concur 

with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 18, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41648 Document: 00513766476 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/18/2016
No. 15-41648

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Counsel’s motion to withdraw 

based on a purported conflict and appoint new counsel or allow the defendant 

to represent his own interest is DENIED as moot.

 Case: 15-41648 Document: 00513766476 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/18/2016
Exhibit 10.49

                         AMENDMENT NO. 3
                                TO
                     FLEMING COMPANIES, INC.
                    1990 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN


          WHEREAS, Fleming Companies, Inc. (the "Company")
presently has in existence the 1990 Stock Incentive Plan (the
"Plan"); and

          WHEREAS, the Compensation and Organization Committee of
the Board of Directors has recommended that the following
amendment to the Plan be made in order to provide that
outstanding awards under the Plan will terminate by their
respective terms and not upon termination of the Plan; and

          WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has authorized and
approved this Amendment No. 3 to the Plan at a meeting held on
March 2, 1999.

          NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

                    Section 11.2.  The last sentence of Section
          11.2 is hereby amended by deleting it in its
          entirety and replacing it with the following:

                    Provided further, the termination of the
          Plan shall not cause a termination of any
          previously granted Award.

          Except as provided in this Amendment No. 3, in all
other respects the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed.  The
effective date of this Amendment No. 3 shall be March 2, 1999.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFONSO REYES-CAMACHO,

Petitioner,

 v.

LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 14-72393

Agency No. A200-695-118

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 16, 2016**

Before: LEAVY, BERZON, and MURGIA, Circuit Judges.

Alfonso Reyes-Camacho, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, 

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

NOV 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-72393 

(“CAT”). We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. 

Silaya v. Mukasey, 524 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th Cir. 2008). We deny the petition for 

review.

The record does not compel the conclusion that Reyes-Camacho established 

extraordinary circumstances to excuse his untimely-filed asylum application. See 

8 C.F.R. § 1208.4(a)(5). Thus, we deny the petition for review as to ReyesCamacho’s asylum claim.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that Reyes-Camacho 

failed to establish that it is more likely than not that he would be persecuted if he 

returns to Mexico. See Nagoulko v. INS, 333 F.3d 1016, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) 

(possibility of future persecution “too speculative”). Thus, we deny the petition for 

review as to Reyes-Camacho’s withholding of removal claim.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because 

Reyes-Camacho failed to show it is more likely than not that he would be tortured 

by or with the consent or acquiescence of the Mexican government. See Silaya, 

524 F.3d at 1073.

Finally, we deny as unnecessary Reyes-Camacho’s renewed request for a 

stay of removal because the court previously granted a temporary stay of removal. 
3 14-72393 

The stay of removal will terminate upon issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000351541
<NAME> BCT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,727
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,305
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,738
<INVENTORY>                                      2,507
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,986
<PP&E>                                           1,701
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,176
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  17,326
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,936
<BONDS>                                            345
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           233
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    17,326
<SALES>                                         10,297
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,839
<CGS>                                            8,790
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   350
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,810
<INCOME-TAX>                                       694
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,116
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (31)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,085
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .21


</TABLE>
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-10-00804-CR

 NO. 03-10-00811-CR 

Darrell Lynn Edison, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 147TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-10-907220 & D-1-DC-09-206713

HONORABLE WILFORD FLOWERS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Darrell Lynn Edison has filed a pro se notice of appeal in each of the above

causes, seeking to appeal his convictions for the offenses of continuous violence against the family

and possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, methamphetamine. In each cause, the

district court has certified that this is a plea-bargain case and that the defendant has no right of

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals.

__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Dismissed

Filed: January 7, 2011

Do Not Publish
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned officer of Ortec International, Inc. ("Ortec"), hereby certifies that Ortec's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Annual
Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Ortec.

Dated: June 19, 2007

|/s/ Ron Lipstein           
|---------------------------
|Ron Lipstein               
|Principal Executive Officer

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
PLD Telekom Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated March 21, 1997,
related to the consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and
cash flows for PLD Telekom Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996, which
report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) for the
year ended December 31, 1998 of PLD Telekom Inc.




KPMG LLP
Chartered Accountants

Calgary, Canada
April 23, 1999
REF ID:A65999 

nr. Doua1d It. Mer-l&e l 

D!nn:tcr, Banard CoUece ObSUYQ.tOJ'y 

32 !Jubbard Park 

Cadrrtdp 38, Mun.chueeti. 

DM.r l)ao. Hem:elt 

hr1e.l1 ;i. 2 o '6 

1 3 AFR '195·\ 

A joint. DlQet~ or all.~ 'D9Mle araan1•e4 \11:14el' the 

•tio:oD..l. heur1t.7 Agency Sr.in.titie M.viaorf lcm'd 1a bebl& p~ tor 20-21 llt.T 195'4· 

!be fil"•t dAT vUl. be devoted to ac:cQ!CtllehiJJa admhdatrat1ve 

Mt&Ua aDd. t&ta111.nr1nitii thoee pe.nel --.ber• not pnv10WI)¥ 

•cquo.inwcl with ihe ~Y With tbs bighltghta ot O\tr' orgazt.Uation 

aM. atatt. TllfJ fJCSCon1 dtJ¥ .ts to 'be devoted to • d.etailed '.P)"eit'nttl1i1on a.DJ d.iacuaaton ~ ~ of «n" tecbnical f1"0blem and 'to p:W. 

tar :ru.ture ~l ac:tt~11ti.;e. 

fQU. will !lOt ~ nq"..itnd tQ att.A-1 'tbfl tw!et1Jl6 Oil !(') Ml.)' J but 

tt. u 1ince:r11~ hope-~ t!nt 10ll Yill be a'ble to be l'l"!&ent tar t.he 

11 Ma.1 llM'tbg. It' )'OU v111 let • know \bat 1Q\l plan w e.t.tend, 

ad the .odb ot tra'irel 70\l prefer, I v1U 1-Ye the Mef:SIW7 travel 

ardor• MJ1t to YOU· 

cc: AG 

C/S 

S/ASST (Mr. Fried.man) 

IU.neeroJ.y, 

WILLIA.'4 ., • l'llIEttf..\lf 

Bn~iw Searataey 

EA &cJ.entt:rie M.v1aory Board 

M/R: Announces Joint meeting of' three panels or the NSA8Al3 and invited 

p.a.nel. member' a attendance. 

Lt. I.T. McDonald/S/ASST/60493/12 Apr 54/can 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

----------................. ~---"'""""'.--= ---·~---
/ 

REF ID:A58768 

TOP SECREJ •• COPY 

OFF.ICES OF THE CYPHER FULICY OOARD, 

C/o ROOM 9, 

10, Chesterfield Street, 

London, W. 1. 

Grosvenor 3095-6 

L/325A/62¥ 

The Director, 

Armed Forces Security Agency, 

Washington. 

FOREIGN OFFICE, S. Vi. l 

6th June, 1951. 

This paper BRUSA c/s 504 (of which I enclose 

6 copies Noa. 36 to 41) describes a small .mechanical 

cypher machine which includes the cryptographic 

technique of the Hagelin M.209 but adds a permuting 

rotor of novel design. · 

T'ne detailed security appreciation will not be 

available before the Conterence. 

/s/ Secretary, 

Cypher Policy Board 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-11-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a .. 

•
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          40,674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,514
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,986
<INVENTORY>                                      1,840
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,972
<PP&E>                                         106,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                  15,103
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 306,357
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           46,738
<BONDS>                                        107,954
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         31
<COMMON>                                       180,878
<OTHER-SE>                                    (42,955)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   306,357
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                61,966
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   21,709
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,390
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,279
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (6,271)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,669
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,461)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,461)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)




</TABLE>
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH 

Working Group: Meeting and Webinar

372799432

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Aug 26, 2013 09:26 AM EDT 492

Total Attended

28

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City State Organization Zip Code

Rodney Beever US 491 E. princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403

Robert Brown US 9000 conservation Way Fort Wayne IN Waterfurnace International 46809

Tim Corcoran US 3933 us rt 11 Cortland NY Intertek 13045

Craig Davenport US 3933 US Route 11 Cortland NY Intertek Testing Services 13045

Eric Goode US 4200 Forbes Blvd. Lanham MD CQ Transcriptions 20706

Marshall Hunt US 245 Market Street San Francisco CA Pacific Gas & Electric 94177

Diane Jakobs US 5600 Old Greenwood Road Fort Smith AR Rheem Heating & Cooling 72917

brian jeanes US 908 HWY 15 North New Albany MS Master-Bilt Products 38652

Dominic Kolandayan US 1645 Wallace Dr., Suite 110 Carrollton PA Daikin 75006

Stephen Kowalski US 2701 Wilma Rudolph Blvd. Clarksville TN Ingersoll Rand - Trane North 

America

37040

Bill Larson US 727 second street Hudson WI Norlake, Inc. 54016

Jonathan Lemmond US 2111 Wilson Boulevard Arlington VA AHRI 22201

steven maddox US 5005 york drive norman OK johnson controls 73069

John McLaughlin US 4900 Tech Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021

David Mecadon US 539 Dunksferry Road Bensalem PA National Refrigeration and Air 

Conditioning

19020

mark menzer US 11112 Chessington Reston VA Intertek 20194

John Morris US 539 Dunksferry Rd Bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator 19020

Frank Myers US 3209 Galvez Ave Fort Worth TX PVI Industries, LLC 76111

David Peterson US PO Box 4729 Utica NY ECR International 13504

wes roan US 1914 Randolph Dr. Bryan OH Bard Manufacturing Co., Inc. 43506

Joe Sanders US 4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort Worth TX Traulsen 76106

Stephen Schaefer US 618 Hwy 74 South Peachtree City GA Hoshizaki America 30269

m suami CA 930 carling ottawa ON NRCan K1A 0Y3

Rusty Tharp US 5151 San Felipe Houston TX Goodman Manufacturing 77070

chris thompson US 2175 West Park Place Blvd Stone Mountain GA Heatcraft 30087

Eric Truskoski US 200 Lafayette St. Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation 49333

kevin washington US 1250 conn ave nw washington DC ITW 20036

Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201

General Information