alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered March 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01269-CV

IN RE HERMES SARGENT BATES, LLP AND COLLEEN MCCOY, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 12-03421

ORDER

Before Justices Francis, Evans and Whitehill

By order dated December 30, 2014, the Court abated the petition for writ of mandamus 

pursuant to rule 7.2(b) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to allow the successor judge to 

reconsider the trial court’s ruling. Relator moves to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus 

stating the trial court has granted relator’s motion for reconsideration and has granted the relief 

sought by the petition for writ of mandamus. We ORDER the petition for writ of mandamus 

REINSTATED. We LIFT the stay of proceedings in the trial court imposed by this Court’s 

October 8, 2014 order. We GRANT relator’s motion to dismiss the petition for writ of 

mandamus. Pursuant to the Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the petition for writ of 

mandamus. We ORDER the parties to bear their own costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
• . 

- ' 

REF ID:A71053 

r- n i .- '"' - • - s , ~ 

bb'i"rilCJLJ1 ! .11L 

lel1 'i'el•phon• taboratorlee 

46J led stnd 

lew fork U.1 I• Tork 

A T!lt.'Tl mr, 1r. P. 1. 11,. 

Ontlean1 

The knf Seeurt• Jgencr ts 1n poa11esaion ot a total of twelft 

SlGSALI teN1aals1 end tbrff StGS"c.JS, thl-M !IGGltll, and t.M 

!IGB!?SO oqaip:ents. Thia Agoc7 baa been coruddering tor atonge 

aa War ReaerY~, six SlG!"ALY teninala, and two aGSteS, three ftIGGRIV, 

and t.wo !!IGBtao equtp&r.'l.t.a. These silf tora1.ttsl.e and the related 

equ1pamt1 WUt.lld be kept in condition ud maintained ao that U..:, 

C8ll 'be 1"econd1Uoned, inatftlled, and utilised 1n the shortest poRSible 

t.1- 1n '\.he eftSlt or a nat.1onal nergeoT• 'the l'fttllning six- SlGSALt 

t~ am one !:"!OSOBS oqu1pment wOQld be salw.ged. 

Tao of the sis t.enaUu.r.ls lntended for ~ton are sti U in• 

atall.84 in Waahington but haw not been u3ed tor sot1e tilte. The nrain:1Jtg tour Jaave been wi•hdram froa 00rrloe1 three haw l:Jffn Ntu!'ned 

to this dgenq ud one ia a•.cred at anot.h.er location. 

It tho six tonrlnsls vere to be pla.oed in Wu Qeserve tor future 

rea.e, it would be nreosaar;y tc :rehabilit~te and teat eaeh tor.a.inal. 

prior to atore.ae. The pr11Cticabil1t7 of' suoh a project tr'Ot1 the T1npoint ot tiu and aoet 1e questioned.. A1. present, ngin•er• tre. the 

Bell Telephone L«il~ontori.81 are tlie onq penonael who haw the 

knowl«tdp, ab!lt~, and esperlence to asaiat. !n ufft"bJ.nJ.~g whether or 

net it 1l!OU1d be adTfaeble- to rehabilitate this equipmet in prderen.oe 

to aubet.itotiag newlJ' 4•signed end conatrueted equlpnent. re.atora la· 

wl'M inalude :relatlft eoon097, complex1t7 8M dac of equ1p11enta, 

opentional end •1ntelaaruM ~aireaerta, and tr.tu ot ftbabU:l.tation 

u oampuecl with th• UM it woald take to deeita and produoe ri• 

eqdplllftlia. 

rt 11 requeated. that an eagiJleer t1"0ll the Bell Telephaae Labor'a• 

tol'lee 'be autlsorlsed to 'ti.sit the f.;q Secsuri'7 Agaq to CGU\llft with 

... l 

~- ll CONFiDEfJflAE ---~ -

1_::_ - ~eclassifi ed and ap"proved for release by NSA on 06-02-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352f3-- · 
CStU.I 

Bell T•lephone La.bol'a'\orl .. (Cen~inu.ed} 

.ln\T S•eurit)" A&•DOJ Hpreaentat:lw1 t.nc:l inapeot th1a equipaers:t in 

ordel" that the praat1uo1ll~J ot nhabtll'b~iDC aud •tonog tbAt•• 

9'U1pun"• oaa. 1>• tttloieatly 4etel'll111.ed. 

ti waul4 ebY!.O\lalT be &dw.nt&g•ou• it tM •ngln••r aeleot4t4 for 

th1• purpose 1• one who ha• k•n tntlu:tel1 oou.eeted •l th th• arlgin&l 

4eTeloplien" .r tlda equip•nt. 

ftd• .lg•ner With4t• ~ expr••• :lt• apprHla·Uon for the oourt.17 

at•nd•d t.. Sir. In.DA durt111 1'11 reoent Tltlt t• hlt Laboratoriea and 

al•o tor 7our w1111ngaeN to '9tra7 th.• •lrP•U• ot a Yi.at.-. b7 7w:r 

ftllDNr tor the purpoae Of 4iteu•aiag '1le &bcmt l\l9.)Jet. 

c ' I I 

I 

lllROU> G. HAYBa 

Coloml, Signal Carpa Ch1et~ J.nlT Seour1t1 Ageno7 

DEC I7W 

SIGNED At.'D s~ cNTour
#### Treloar, Administrator, Appellant, vs. Osborne, Respondent.

*January 19*

*February 8, 1898.*

*Appeal: Exceptions to findings.*

*A*finding of the trial oourt cannot be reviewed on appeal unless an exception thereto is contained in the bill of exceptions.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Iowa •county: Geo. ClemeNtsoN, Circuit judge.

*Affirmed.*

Eor the appellant there was a brief by *liyan <Ss Merton,*and oral argument by *E. Merton.*

*Aldr'o JenJes,*for the respondent.

PinNet, J.

This action was brought to enforce a liability •against the defendant, under sec. 1113, R. S. 1878, as a stockholder in a corporation which had transacted business with the plaintiff’s intestate, and had given her its promissory note for $1,400, before one half of its capital stock had been subscribed, and before twenty per cent, thereof had been actu•ally paid in, ás prescribed by said section. The answer put in issue all the allegations of the complaint, and there was -a trial before the court without a jury. The court found that the allegations of the complaint were not sustained by the proof, and that the defendant was entitled to judgment •dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint, with costs. Judgment was perfected accordingly, from which the plaintiff appealed.

*462A bill of exceptions was settled, but it did not contain any-written exception to the finding of the court. Exceptions to the finding, to be available on appeal, must be inserted in the bill of exceptions. R. S. 1878, sec. 2875; *Cramer v. Hanaford,*53 Wis. 85. Otherwise the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding cannot be inquired into on appeal from the judgment. *Saukville v. Grafton,*68 Wis. 192. In the absence of such exceptions, the only question for consideration will be whether the pleadings and findings warrant and support the judgment. *Mead v. Chippewa Co.*41 Wis. 205 5 *Wis. River Imp. Co. v. Lyons,*30 Wis. 61; *Thomas v. Mitchell,*27 Wis. 414. In the absence of any proper exception to the finding, its correctness cannot be reviewed on this appeal, and the judgment of the circuit court must therefore be affirmed.

*By the*Cowd.— It is so ordered accordingly.
Chapter 391-3-1 Rules for Air Quality Control

CLEAN COPY

OF THE

RULES FOR AIR QUALITY CONTROL

CHAPTER 391-3-1

PERTAINING TO

RULE .15, “TRANSPORTATION CONFIRMITY”

Rule 391-3-1-.15, "Transportation Conformity," is being added to read as follows:

391-3-1-.15 Transportation Conformity. 

The criteria and procedures specified in the “Transportation Conformity Manual” dated April 15, 

2010, implement the requirements of Section 176(c)(4)(E) of the Clean Air Act for state 

implementation plans to include criteria and procedures for consultation, enforcement, and 

enforceability with respect to the conformity of transportation plans, programs, and projects 

developed, funded or approved under Title 23 United States Code (23 U.S.C.) or the Federal 

Transit Laws to the applicable implementation plan. 

Authority: O.C.G.A. Section 12-9-1 et seq., as amended.
99-1237.

#### In re Maloney.

Columbiana App. No. 95C074. This cause is an appeal by William Maloney from the judgment of the Columbiana County Court of Appeals entered in court of appeals case No. 95C074 on May 18, 1999. Supreme Court case No. 99-1236 is an appeal by Phyllis Mitchell of the same judgment.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the appeal of William Maloney be filed and docketed as a second notice of appeal in case No. 99-1236 and this case be dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that appellee shall proceed to file only one memorandum in response, if any, in case No. 99-1236, as prescribed by S.Ct.Prac.R. III(2)(D).
#### Joseph DiPietro et al., Respondents, v Seth Rotter, P.C., et al., Appellants.

[773 NYS2d 397]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louis York, J.), entered June 13, 2003, which, in an action for legal malpractice, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

An issue of fact exists as to whether plaintiff, a building handyman burned when the door to the building’s incinerator flew open, would have obtained a favorable result in the action he brought against the incinerator maintenance company but for defendant attorneys’ alleged malpractice in not responding to discovery requests *(see Zarin v Reid & Priest,*184 AD2d 385, 386 [1992]). That issue is raised by the deposition testimony of *225plaintiff and two coworkers that the maintenance company’s servicemen were frequently at the building and were informed about the incinerator door opening when it was supposed to remain shut, and the affidavit of plaintiffs expert opining that the incinerator latch was defectively designed and that the defect contributed to the accident. We note that defendants did not submit an expert’s affidavit. Evidence of defendant Ripka’s participation in the underlying action while the malpractice was being committed, including defendant Rotter’s letter of resignation to plaintiff, raises an issue of fact as to whether plaintiff and Ripka were in an attorney-client relationship.

We have considered and rejected defendants’ other arguments. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Williams, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.
Exhibit 10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

AMENDMENT TO THE CONECTIV SUPPLEMENTAL 
 EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN 
 This Amendment to the Conectiv Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby made effective as of this first day of August, 2011, in order to freeze the Plan with regard to participation by any individuals not already participating in the Plan as of July 31,
2011. 
 WITNESSETH 
 WHEREAS, sponsorship of the Plan has been assumed by Pepco Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company desires to freeze the Plan to new participants; and 

WHEREAS, the Plan provides in Section 81 that the Plan may be amended by the “Committee” (which is defined in the
Plan as the Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Company’s board of directors); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company
and the Company’s board of directors have taken on the responsibilities of the original sponsor of the Plan and acts as the Committee (as that term is defined in the Plan); and 

WHEREAS, the board of directors of the Company has approved this amendment to the Plan. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows: 
 1. Effective as of August 1, 2011, the following additional sentence is added at the end of Section 1.17 (defining “Participant”), to read: 

“Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, no individual shall be a Participant in the Plan on or after August 1,
2011 who was not already a Participant in the Plan as of July 31, 2011.” 
 2. In all other respects, the Plan shall
remain in full force and effect without change. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to the Plan to be
executed and this __28th            day of __July            , 2011. 

			
	PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	        /s/ Joseph M. Rigby
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2215 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2215

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2021

Ms. Stabenow (for herself, Mr. Crapo, Mrs. Feinstein, Ms. Collins, Mr. 
   Leahy, Mr. Risch, Ms. Rosen, Mr. Marshall, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. 
Moran) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 
                      to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 
 for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student 
                loan repayment or forgiveness programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Veterinary Medicine Loan Repayment 
Program Enhancement Act''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PARTICIPANTS IN CERTAIN 
              VETERINARY STUDENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 
              PROGRAMS.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (4) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``such Act,'',
            (2) by striking the period at the end and inserting ``, 
        under section 1415A of the National Agricultural Research, 
        Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or 
        under any other State loan repayment or loan forgiveness 
        program that is intended to provide for increased access to 
        veterinary services in such State.'', and
            (3) by striking ``state'' in the heading and inserting 
        ``other''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received by an individual in taxable years beginning 
after December 31, 2021.
                                 <all>
```
/ 

. I:··, 

' I ' ·~.~~ ' 

REF ID:A5220~ 

Mr. '.Jeorge A. Jraham, 

s1,nal Corpe Laboratoriea, 

rort llonaoutb, 

N. J. 

re 

februury 24, 1933. 

The athohed ahtcb (modif'ic:aUon of wiring diagram 

on blue priot ~S-B-U 7'1 A) 1how1 whaat I •iah to do. I Ht DO 

reaaon why it won't work. I haYe tried it with temporary conductor• eet up by r.atening olip1 to the upper and lower bomologou1 

oontaota of the diao tran1~1tter. By introduoing the 1eoond tape 

tr8n1mitter to Y~ry the 1hort-oireuitlng ct the lert and ri~bt 

contaot1 of the dilo t ... ne!llitter, two rtTOlYing t.apee or unequal 

length can be uaed to 1t1p together and produce a 1ingl1, Ytry 

long reeultant key. Ont or the indirect re1ult1 ia to apeed up 

enoipherment or deoipherment, btOPUlt the cipher wheel need not 

go through an anrage dhplaotaent or l3 •t•p• ror taoh letter. 

It :rou will try thia aoheme out you will aoon Ht what l mean. 

The aryptograpbio aeourity 11 not aaterially rtduo•d by thi1 

11odifio11t.ion. 

I hope you can aend mt a 1econd tranamitter aoon. 

rr you try thia out, let •• know your rtaotion. 

T•ry truly 7our1, 

William r. Friedman 

ino. 

Sketoh 

- .... ·-r - - - - .. - - - - - - ... - - - - - - - . 

,_ / : ' 

~ -: .-'. ~--· 

pproved for Release by NSA on 11-19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 

13526 
• 
• 

.... -· ....... -·-· _ ___.._ -~ .. ~-.. ·. 
t • . REF ID:A522& 

~(~ 

: ---1~~/_i -- I ' .--+---==~-= --J-- ---::J 

\. \. 

-... ~ -·--·--... ~ - ._ ... , . 

I I 

1 

-----r-- ... ------------it---:J I .··· -----------· , ~ 

Ii_,....-* .... I i 

I .,.., 

r 

.,j 

Ii 

11 

! 1. j. --.~ -l-+-- __ -+~-- 1) I. ~ =----+------u · .. ,. - I------·---.,----·-·--- -

.--·--~----. -- .. ... ~ I : ~ ! . 'I 

! ! ~- . 

i I i j i 

i ··-~-- I 

4t-. I ~. 

'1.· It, I - - -- ~v- - - .. -. -·-1 ; ~ l I 

1 ! I ii . I ='\~ I ' 

~1:~ c-.~---~--__ ; ~J ~',, . 

e:-rj·~ I ! 

i 

...__..,...: J. : . - -- • - - . i 

··1

1 ·l==:-=- -· -~·31 /l LLI ---+--- - ·-·--··-··-- ·-- ~--==·--- ---~ 

-~-·-·--·-.... ~-·- ·- ~ - - -· -- - _ .. _ - -
• ~F 

~v 1--11 . -I , 

I I 

ID:A52207~. 

-- -· r 

' . I. 

I ;--

'}... 

r· 

I 

- ... L::.' R;J 

-t··· ~-.- -----.. -·---~ -~- - ~----·- --· ----

4t. I ~. 

! 

r--------4--+--·-··--------- .. - -

.. , . / .... ~<:!;at' ~. i \~~.,.,,. 

- -· -- - - -- r ~~ - -1 

~--+-+-i-+4---- .... -----··· ------ . : =\~- I I 

~. 

.-;---------·-·-· ... -------- -·. 

~~~--------· ------------·--·----··-t· --\ '- 'i I i I I ~ 

....+----++-: ~1. . - ----- .. ' - -- -- -'-··--·-~~- ! ' ' ' 

I I ---¥... \ ~..._L.~4 t" ~ '\.~ 1

1 

I \ \ ! fbc::-- -

=====--'~-~!'I. I 

-------·····- . . - ··-· -·---·-·---- -···--- I .. . . ... --·-· ~. ' ... ; 

·- - -· --- -- ---· - - _j 

~ 

I I 

I I I I ! p>i~.u.....Jt \ · ·~ 

I l. l'liJJ.Aw '· ."'*'" J)}.4,A.. 
ID:A522079 

·-et :-r- + · 

~----------·----···----------

.., __ .._ __ ..,.lii!loii. .._, . 

\·: 

,.._ _____ . ___ ...... , __ ,_ ···-··----

./ --~·~ 

.. 

. · '·· 

· ...... 

..... ---------~.,....-·-•"·~--·~·· --··------( 

~.\- .. --~. · ... · _ _, ..... '.o.•-~4 \ •-

.. _ ..•. J.. - -··
REF ID:A66347 

llr'. v. 1. a. ~ 

Yice Preeident 11.Jld Oenor-...l ~r 

1hetronict1 

~ 

DiTS...ion 

Xlectric ~uy 

~1 Jlevfatk 

Dee.r Dr. Baker l 

8«1Alt 7 07 

/oJ~Vf 

Die lli.rector i.. httor=ed. m tha.t ;vou. ha.ve accepted l1U 

1ari:ta;t1on to 'be• •mber Qf ~ Zlactronk• h.Ml at the Jiational 

lecurl:t,-

at the brd., 

N;mey 

t vilh 

ScientU'ic 

to apreao 

A4rleor:t 

the 

J:blu"d.. 

Director'• 

A9 Jtacutive 

gratif'ic&tton, ~ .,. wu-..., personal thank19, tar rour ~acceptance, •inee it 

ie in4icative or J'Qltr tntereat in &01 yau:r eet:lmto ot the JJctor· ~ or the )'X'Oble'lns vith vbieb 110 m1t contend 1a the 111terest 

er the -.tione.J. w~. 

fDe aext .et~ of tho Mvie0rt Joard itself will be bcl~ 

~blo this 'Pri»«. At that 1"1- it a 1iltended. trot a ~ort 

on the panel ~ship~ 'be l'Uhmltted to the lbard, together 

vi.th 90Z!1$ problet11J that can 'be rd'exTed. for ~cifie pu>.el aot1on. 

l\4tsequen:t to thi1 b.rd. meeting, the panel chairmen, vbo 11.l'e aUo 

~-of the Board, v1ll ""1 able to confer vith 1'0l1 on •ttera 

of Jll..l1el orpn1r4tion 6nd future activities. 

l • lookitJ!S f~ to 9"1ilf3 J'OU when rou an next ill 

Wuhingt.on. 

cc; NJ 

c/s 

S/ASST (Mr. Friednan) 

wm.v.M P" l'lUl!tMA!f 

11'1Gc19..l .Aff iltant 

Q4. 

~1ve hcreta.r.r 

EA.SA! 

M/R 1 Acknml'le<lgement ot Dr. Beker•• acceptance ot the Director• a 

invitation to be a mtlber at the NSASAB's Electronics Panel. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

~-----· -----
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2273 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2273

 To authorize Inspectors General to continue operations during a lapse 
               in appropriations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 24, 2021

 Mr. Braun (for himself and Mr. Carper) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize Inspectors General to continue operations during a lapse 
               in appropriations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Keep the Watchdogs Running Act''.

SEC. 2. INSPECTOR GENERAL OVERSIGHT DURING LAPSE IN APPROPRIATIONS.

    Section 6(g) of the Inspector General Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(4) Notwithstanding any other provision of law and in addition to 
any other authority, during a lapse in appropriations, an Inspector 
General may incur obligations in advance of appropriations--
            ``(A) for such amounts as may be necessary and at a rate 
        for operations and under the authority and conditions as 
        provided in the most recently enacted appropriations Acts; and
            ``(B) to perform the duties of the Office with respect to 
        any program and operation of the establishment that continues 
        during the lapse in appropriations.''.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-14-00331-CV

Gene DEVOLL,

Appellant

v.

Rebecca DEMONBREUN and William Dowds,

Appellees

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-05169

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we withdraw the judgment and the 

majority and dissenting opinions of August 31, 2016, and we substitute this opinion and judgment 

in their stead. 

This appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of this appeal are taxed against the party that incurred 

them.

SIGNED November 16, 2016.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5

<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                  65,000
<SECURITIES>                            1,271,764
<RECEIVABLES>                           53,252
<ALLOWANCES>                            (439,787)
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        1,704,372
<PP&E>                                  286,897
<DEPRECIATION>                          (55,596)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,435,864
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   1,929,314
<BONDS>                                 0
<COMMON>                                20,624
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<OTHER-SE>                              417,601
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            2,435,864
<SALES>                                 567,937
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        567,937
<CGS>                                   329,728
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        1,787,663
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        229,688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      21,365
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (869,880)
<INCOME-TAX>                            (87,308)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     0
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            (782,572)
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.10)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.10)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10(a)

 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 173 to Registration Statement No. 33-26305 on Form N-1A of our report dated May 26, 2011, relating to the financial statements and financial highlights of the BlackRock Money Market, BlackRock U.S. Treasury Money Market, BlackRock Municipal Money Market, BlackRock New Jersey Municipal Money Market, BlackRock North Carolina Municipal Money Market, BlackRock Ohio Municipal Money Market, BlackRock Pennsylvania Municipal Money Market, and BlackRock Virginia Municipal Money Market Portfolios (eight of the twenty-five portfolios constituting the BlackRock Funds), appearing in the Annual Report on Form N-CSR of BlackRock Funds for the year ended March 31, 2011, and to the references to us under the headings "Financial Highlights" in the Prospectuses and "Financial Statements" in the Statement of Additional Information, which are part of such Registration Statement.

 /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP



Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


July 27, 2011