alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2







Exhibit 10.2




Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the

Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.



Merck KGaA . Germany . Frankfurter Str. 250 . 64293 Darmstadt




	 	 	 	 	 

	Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

	 	Date
	 	19.05.2011 
	Steven J. Ritter, Ph.D., J.D.

	 	Division/Dept.
	 	Corp. Legal & Intel. Property / CL-S
	Vice President — Intellectual Property and Contracts

	 	Care of
	 	Dr. Simone Heitz
	167 Sidney Street

	 	Phone
	 	+49 61 51 72-2160 
	Cambridge, MA 02139

	 	Fax
	 	+49 61 51 72-2373 
	USA

	 	E-Mail
	 	simone.heitz@merck.de






Our license agreement dated December 18, 2007, effective February 4, 2008 (the “Agreement”)



Dear Steve,



It is recognized that Idera has met its obligations of delivering [**] Follow-on Compounds in
accordance with Section 3.6 of the Agreement. Merck is actively characterizing these Follow-on
Compounds toward a goal of selecting [**] for possible development. As this characterization is
currently ongoing, Merck requests that Idera allow Merck to extend the period of time for selecting
the Follow-on Compounds such that Merck’s right to make a selection pursuant to Section 3.6 of the
Agreement would expire on [**]. This addition time will enable Merck to further characterize the
Follow-on Compounds and make a more informed decision in the selection process based on additional
preclinical experiments. During this additional time period, Idera’s role in Merck’s selection
process is expected to be passive and no additional resources are expected to be provided by Idera
under the terms of the Agreement.



If you are in agreement with the above please indicate so by returning the attached duplicate of
this letter duly signed.



Very truly yours,




	 	 	 	 	 

	Merck KGaA

	 	 	 	Agreed:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	i.V.

	 	i.V.
	 	Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Astrid Perschl
 
 Dr. Astrid
Perschl

	 	/s/ Simone Heitz
 
 Dr. Simone
Heitz
	 	/s/ Louis J. Arcudi
 
 Louis
J. Arcudi, III






	 	 	 	 	 

	Merck KGaA · Germany
	 	 	 	 
	Frankfurter Str. 250

	 	Corporation with General Partners
	 	Executive Board and General Partners:
	64293 Darmstadt

	 	Commercial Register AG Darmstadt HRB 6164	 	 
	Phone +49 6151 72-0

	 	Registered Office: Darmstadt
	 	Karl-Ludwig Kley (Chairman),
	Fax +49 6151 72-2000

	 	Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
	 	Michael Becker, Kai Beckmann,
	www.merck.de

	 	Rolf Krebs
	 	Stefan Oschmann, Bernd Reckmann
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000351532
<NAME> INTERFERON SCIENCES INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      13,338,237
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  399,775
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,816,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,830,198
<PP&E>                                      12,613,905
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,693,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,228,373
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,987,753
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       122,851
<OTHER-SE>                                  22,117,769
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,228,373
<SALES>                                        654,199
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               654,199
<CGS>                                          501,374
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  501,374
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,514,523
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,184,809)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,184,809)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,184,809)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.26)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.26)
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 3**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We consent to the inclusion in this Annual Report (Form 40-F) ofFalconbridge Limited of our report dated February 7, 2006 (except as to Note 23which is as of March 16, 2006) with respect to the consolidated financialstatements of Falconbridge Limited incorporated by reference therein.

 

We also consent to the incorporation by reference into the RegistrationStatement (Form S-8 No. 333-126529) pertaining to Falconbridge Limited’s StockOption Plans and into the Registration Statement (Form F-8) (File No.333-129218), as amended on December 15, 2005, January 20, 2006 and February 28,2006, pertaining to Inco Limited’s offer dated October 24, 2005 to purchase allof the issued and outstanding common shares of Falconbridge Limited of ourreport dated February 7, 2006 (except as to Note 23 which is as of March 16,2006) with respect to the consolidated financial statements included inFalconbridge Limited’s Annual Report (Form 40-F) for the year ended December31, 2005.

 

 
|            |                  | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|-----------------|-----------------------|---------------------------|--------|
| Toronto, Canada | Chartered Accountants |                      |
| March 24, 2006  |                  |

 

----
Speaker: Brigadier General John Tiltman 

A lot of...There have been times since the war when people have been very 

critical of French security and one thing or another. But I was in French GHQ in 

La Ferté-sous-Jouarre about the 15th of May, 1940 after the Germans were well 

into France. And we had a small party there under a major of mine, Jeffrey (B% 

Evans). And I had a conversation with my sort of opposite number on the French

—Major Bertrand. And he said to me, “We would like to keep your party, but we 

realize we can’t. We’re finished here.” They realized that. France was going to 

capitulate altogether even as early as that. And he said, “You’d better...We’d 

better get them out for you as soon as we can.” And then, he said, “I want to give 

you...” I all had to do this through an interpreter because my French is school 

French, and he didn’t have any at all. “I want to assure you of one thing. None of 

your secrets will get into enemy hands,” and they never did. But there must have 

been something like a hundred French officers who knew virtually everything we 

were doing. They had introduced us to the solution of the Enigma. So we, ah...

they had to have that. Some of them were in occupied France. Bertrand, himself, I 

believe, was under Gestapo arrest at one time during the war. And to the best of 

my knowledge, the Germans never got the slightest information about what ...
OCSigC-072-Ge~eral 

REF ID:A1049Jaril 

• 

COPY 

10 

AlliS1•.st 21, 1936 

Proceedings of Pc.te?1.t :Board 

Director, Aircraft Ba.dio Laboratory, 

l·rright l:,ield, Dayton, Ohio 

1. mien considering an invention with e. vicn-1 to filing 

application for pate::it under the :grovisions of Pa.r. 5, .AU 850-50, 

the following i!lformation is neceesal"Y': 

!:• Whether or not the invention has I:lilita,r:: value. 

!· Ullcler which class, as described in Par. 6, AR ~50-50, the 

invention should be placed. 

,g. Whether or aot the interests of the service demand a 

co::tplete assignment. 

d. llhether or not the inventor desires to obtain a patent 

underthe ~revisions of Par. 5, .Alt 850~&0. 

2. It is requested tho.t the PQteat Board of ~our Ia.boreto~ 

Llclude this i.lfor1!IB.tion in the findi~s of its f11t1J.re reports. 

l3y order of the Acting Chief Sil:Jlal Officer: 

Louis :e. r.ender, 

Lieut. Col., S1';nal Corps 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-12-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### APPEAL 

### O F 

### F LORIDA 

### S ECOND 

### D ISTRICT GULF COAST AUTO BROKERS, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v. FULL SPECTRUM AUTO FINANCE, INC., Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 2D23-927 March 13, 2024 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Stephen Walker, Judge. Gregg M. Horowitz, Sarasota, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee. Dana J. Watts of Ulrich, Scarlett, Watts & Dean, P.A., Sarasota, for Appellee/Cross-Appellant. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
I j• 

i . ! ~ 'l;:> j 

. It II; I'\ 

.. 11 

Engineering 

an4 Research. 

rbp-v. 

·-

~·· ,_., 

\j)' 

~;· I 

~ 

!.$.Cole R. B~ Padcfock1 Signal Corps. -

H. A. Fo\7ler, MaJo~~ Signal .Re~er.ve Corpe• 

17 Board of T~nde Bl4g,,' Kansas City, Ma. 

,• 

RepQr.t on.Cipher 171n,er Telegraph, 

Dear Fowler;-. .: · · rL- ~~ . 

l• Yoiu' l~ttar on the auloct of Col. J'ab;van•s ablUt;v § ~ ~ j ' ~ ;,-,r ~1 to b .... ~ the cipher 'printer is J'1st receive4. 1 do not, of' .\ l · 1 

ooune, mow' exactly whnt Col. Faby~ hae,or thinkS he }J,as ~ ~1j broimn, but I am _, imUne~ to ~aoe too much OQnf14ence ln i/ ·- ·, J ~ tit m ha.a in this matter, Be·.~ 0n otheJ> oocasio~ Q~almed \:>,,. Q 1 

ab1l1 't1' to breat this clp~l' but': Wh.on 1 t came to .9, show d.Qen, thev, ·e 

condi tlollS were suah that the b.aldng of tbe cipher depended \;.') ;:;-

upon several lQpothea1s. · I wo~;a not take t1:11& ma~t.er too '-j ~ 1 

serioualy. , ~ - · 

1

, - ' ~ -, 

2. 1 will hoid '1is let1;~~ ~ shO\v 1 t· to Coli MauborgA'le ~ ,..,.-:.. ~ . upon hie return fl'ODJ France at ~ch· time you _will heal" farther . '-- r:· ~ · 

:from· this office .on tbe BUbJect.:1 9- '")?' 'l · 1 

·-' 

z. Thaiik1!18 you. tor 7ov :~onti~ed itterest in tho· s1sna1 c·~..:. · · f 

Corps and antic1pat11J8 the pleasmoe -or -seeing you 111 Washington · ~-. · '!. 

some time ao~n, 1 .remain~.· · · f. · · · . o-,_\ !. 

,' .j . 

l 

v,-er; truly vours. :·) j .. ,, 

-' (: 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

I 1-

1 

i 

i 

,. ' J 

. -

1

.- I 

' <, 

', 

', 
a• 

,_ 

-Q • c.,.Q 

REF ID:A4148~(:J 

17 BOARD OF TRADE BUILDING, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI. 

a, July 1919. 

H. Ao Fowler, Ma.jor,-Signal Reserve C~pe, 

To: The Office of the Chief Signal Officer., Washington, D. c. 

Subject: Report on Cipher Printer Telegi.aph. 

1. While recently on a personal visit to Col. George Fabyan 

at his Riverbank Laboratories, Geneva, Illinois, the writer saw a 

solution breaking the cipher system em.ploY"ed in the Ciph~ Printing TelegE"aph. 

2 • It is suggested that an investigation of the solution 

might be o:$ value to the Signal Oorps!I 

\9\9 JUL ti AM 9 2 1 ... - ---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00634-CR

Ex parte Angel Rey Perez

FROM THE 433RD DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

NO. C2022-1690X, THE HONORABLE DIB WALDRIP, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Angel Rey Perez seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of his pretrial 

application for writ of habeas corpus challenging the amount at which his bond was set. See 

Tex. Code Crim. Proc. arts. 11.08, 11.24. Perez was charged with five counts of smuggling of

persons with a firearm, and bond was set at $100,000 for each count. See Tex. Penal Code 

§ 20.05(b)(1)(D).

On January 4, 2023, the State filed an amended motion to dismiss1 the appeal as 

moot, asserting that while the appeal was pending, Perez was convicted and sentenced pursuant 

to a plea agreement. At this Court’s direction, the district clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s 

record containing judgment forms reflecting that Perez had pleaded guilty and had been 

sentenced to ten years’ confinement for each count. Because Perez has been convicted and 

sentenced, he is no longer subject to pretrial confinement, and his appeal challenging the amount 

1 Although the State titled its motion “Motion to Dismiss Appeal—Supplemental,” we 

construe it as an amended motion to dismiss. The motion was substantively identical to the 

State’s earlier “Motion to Dismiss Appeal” but included copies of Perez’s judgment forms, 

which the State asserts were not yet available at the time it filed the original motion.
2

of pretrial bond has been rendered moot. See Ex parte Tucker, 3 S.W.3d 576, 576 (Tex. Crim. 

App. 1999); Danziger v. State, 786 S.W.2d 723, 724 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990); Armendarez 

v. State, 798 S.W.2d 291, 291 (Tex. Crim. App. 1990); Oldham v. State, 5 S.W.3d 840, 846 

(Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1999, pet. ref’d); Ex parte Valero, No. 03-16-00859-CR, 

2017 WL 3897264, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 24, 2017, no pet.) (mem. op., not designated 

for publication). Accordingly, we grant the State’s amended motion and dismiss the appeal as 

moot. Any additional pending motions are likewise dismissed as moot.

__________________________________________

Rosa Lopez Theofanis, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Theofanis

Dismissed as Moot

Filed: February 28, 2023

Do Not Publish
t REF ID:A369861 • 

CSGAS-71 

Major General J. Oo llauborgne 

UniWd Statee Arrq, Retired 

96 BatUn Road 

l'a1r Ha.,., New JftM¥ 

29 April 1949 

IMloaed h.rewitb. 1s • eopy of a patent 1.ae1:Wd on applioation 

~ 

tw pa'-.\ Hrial nmber 418,868, D11m1ng you &DI! WllHt• r. 

u ooinventon, tor~ tu Enc1rlm1M l'Mt!!'l•· 

tou uy HCall tbat, ta Tift ot the OODdiUou \Dier whioh 

tht !a9ent1on was 119d• ....,. th• applleatiOll tQI' patent tiled, you 

and. •• Frled•n are eUUed to npl.oit tM bmlalUon coaaer- •iall1' la Ul/f 111nnu- poeeible eubject to IA 1.rrevoeable tree u .. lllM - the Oover.-R ~ tb9 IW~ and uee ot the ~tor Gcverzuan1:t.l purpoa ... 

Very 'b'ul.J yours, 

s. KULLMCK, Chiet 

FeeMNb and Develo?nent DivUioa 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeals of -- ) 

) 

Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. ) 

) 

Under Contract No. FA7014-07-A-0020 et al. ) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA Nos. 61149, 61150 

Paul E. Pompeo, Esq. 

Nicole B. Neuman, Esq. 

Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP 

Washington, DC 

E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq. 

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney 

Samuel W. Morris, Esq. 

Trial Attorney 

Defense Contract Management Agency 

Chantilly, VA 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 25 September 2017 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 61149, 61150, Appeals ofBooz Allen 

Hamilton, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
EXHIBIT 99.2

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                JUMBOSPORTS INC.

                 SCHEDULE II - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                Years Ended January 31, 1997 and January 30, 1998



                                                           Additional
                                           Beginning     Charge to Cost                       Ending
                                            Balance        and Expense     Deductions (1)     Balance
<S>                                        <C>           <C>               <C>                <C>
Year ended January 31, 1997
     Allowance for doubtful accounts          --              $273               --            $273

Year ended January 30, 1998
     Allowance for doubtful accounts         $273              255              89             $439

<FN>
----------
     (1)  Write-offs and recoveries
</FN>
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dane A. Miller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biomet, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
   to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
   such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
   covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
   of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
   registrant and have:

  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

  (b) [Not Required]

  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation: and

  (d) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occured during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,
   to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
   of directors:

  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: 1/10/2005                                /s/ Dane A. Miller
      ---------                                ------------------
                                               Dane A. Miller, Ph.D.
                                               President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

    We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements Nos.
033-75934, 333-04280, 333-08047, 333-75339 and 333-43802 on Form S-8 and
Registration Statement Nos. 333-05939, 333-37921, 333-87157 and 333-94859 on
Form S-3 of SatCon Technology Corporation of our report on the financial
statements of Beacon Power Corporation dated March 9, 2001, appearing in this
Amendment No. 3 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of SatCon Technology
Corporation for the year ended September 30, 2000.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 23, 2001
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12550]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05361]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public 
comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the 
Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 29, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(214) 413-6523.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Joint Committee 
will be held Wednesday, April 29, 2015, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via 
teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. For more information please 
contact Lisa Billups at 1-888-912-1227 or 214-413-6523, or write TAP 
Office 1114 Commerce Street, Dallas, TX 75242-1021, or post comments to 
the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various committee issues for submission to 
the IRS and other TAP related topics. Public input is welcomed.

    Dated: March 3, 2015.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-05361 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P