alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

# Certification of CFO
Pursuant to

# 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

# As Adopted Pursuant to

# Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Kemper Investors Life Insurance Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the Report), I, Matthew W. Kindsvogel, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: |  | August 12, 2004
|----- |  | ---------------
|     



|/s/                                          | Matthew W. Kindsvogel
|-------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|                                            
|Matthew W. KindsvogelChief Financial
Officer
μ~~ ~3re) ;~~Famt~~~~-:~ \." 

"ND/OR CARRIER SHEET HQ. 

MUST REMAIN WITH ATTACHED PAPERS 

NUMBER EACH MEMO OR REPLY IN LEFT BORDER, PLACE NAME, RANK AND 

TELEPHONE NUMBER BOTTOM OF EACH ACTION ORA W LINE UNDER EACH ACTION 

ENTER FILE CLASSIFICATION ADJUTANT ___ _ 

TO FROM DATE SUBJECT 

AS-24 AS-82 12 Sept Request for Building T-602 

1. It is r quested hat Building T...S02 be allocated to Security Division, 

teriel Branch or the pose of storing rotor boxes. 

2. It is derstood that this building was previously allocated to Headquarter 

d Head uarters Comp&n1' d ha.s been released as of 11 September 1946. 

AS-82 AS-20 

w~~ WILLIAM HOLLERAN '!2f ctJl.t1'° 

1st Lt., Signal Corps 

Asst. Chief, Materiel Branch 

Ext. 210 

Building T-b02 is assigned to AS-82 for storage of 

rotor boxes. This assignment is in lieu of previously 

allocate& space in building T-111 (old firehouse) which 

is hereby cancel.led. 

roved for Release b NSA on 06-03-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 . WDGSS Farm No. 1078 

116 Nov 45 38900 

PAGE NO. 

LIFT HERE USE OTHER SIDE
December 7, 1977

General Services Administration—Disciplinary

Matter—Authority of the General Services

Administration (5 U.S.C. § 5596)

78-89 MEMORANDUM OPINION FOR THE COUNSEL

TO THE PRESIDENT

This is in response to a request for our views concerning sanctions imposed 

on three employees of the General Services Administration (GSA). The three 

employees were charged with the theft of several packages of cigarettes from a 

blind-operated snack bar. Each of them was suspended without pay for 30 days 

and was demoted two grades. Each person pursued the matter within the GSA 

grievance system and then appealed to the Civil Service Commission’s Federal 

Employee Appeals Authority, which upheld GSA’s action. Petitions to reopen 

and reconsider the cases were filed with the Commission’s Appeals Review 

Board and were denied.

Specifically you asked us whether GSA has authority to restore the 

employees to their prior grades. In our opinion, there are possible legal bases 

for GSA to take such action.

Retroactive restoration of employees to prior grades or to intermediate grades 

is authorized if GSA determines that its action in demoting them was 

"unjustified or unwarranted.” This authority is set forth in the Civil Service 

Commission’s regulation concerning adverse actions, 5 CFR § 752.402 (1977). 

Also, a foundation for such action is provided by the back-pay statute, 5 

U.S.C. 5596 (1976), and the Civil Service Commission’s implementing 

regulations, 5 CFR §§ 550.801-.804 (1977). The back-pay regulations make 

clear that an agency may make such a determination on its own initiative. See 5

CFR § 550.803(a) (1977).

Another possibility would be to increase, on a prospective basis, the grade of 

the employees. O f course, the ordinary requirements for a promotion would 

have to be satisfied.*

*lf there is to be an increase of two grades in one year, waiver of the W hitten amendment may be 

necessary. See § 1310(c) of the Act of Nov. 1, 1951. as amended, 5 U .S.C . 3101 note (1976). The 

general rule under that provision is that employees in the competitive service may not be promoted 

to a higher grade without having served at least one year in the next lower grade. There are certain

(Continued)

389
In our opinion, the fact that G SA ’s sanctions were upheld in the Civil Service 

Commission proceedings does not bar GSA from reconsidering the matter. 

Accordingly, it would seem appropriate for you to refer this matter to GSA for 

further consideration. The question whether any remedial action should be 

taken is for GSA, and we express no opinion regarding that matter.

L a r r y A . H a m m o n d

D eputy Assistant Attorney General

Office o f Legal Counsel

(Continued)

exceptions; and, in special cases, an agency head may obtain a waiver from the Civil Service 

Commission.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 21
 
                          Subsidiaries of the Company
 
    1.  Response Ability Systems, Inc.; incorporated in New Jersey.
 
    2.  United Security Systems, Inc.; incorporated in New Jersey.
 
    3.  Emergency Response Systems, Inc.; incorporated in Delaware; also does
       business in the state of California under the name Personnel Emergency
       Response Systems, Inc.
 
    4.  MSG Security Systems, Inc.; incorporated in Pennsylvania.
 
    5.  Shelton Security, Inc.; incorporated in New Jersey.
 
    6.  The Jupiter Group, Inc.; incorporated in Pennsylvania.
 
    7.  Organization for Enhanced Capabilities, Inc.; incorporated in
       Massachusetts.
 
    8.  Liberty Security Systems, Inc.; incorporated in Pennsylvania.
98-1428.

#### State ex rel. Youngstown City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Youngstown.

In Mandamus. Upon consideration of relator’s motion for an order for respondents to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with our December 2, 1998 order,

IT IS ORDERED that respondents show cause why they should not be held in contempt of our December 2, 1998 order. Any evidence the parties intend to present on the contempt issue is due within thirty days; respondents’ brief is due within twenty days after the submission of evidence; relator’s brief is due within twenty days after the filing of respondents’ brief; and respondents’ reply brief is due within five days after the filing of relator’s brief. See *State ex rel. Howard v. Ferreri*(1995), 72 Ohio St.3d 1543, 650 N.E.2d 903.
REF ID:A67484 

., .......................... ............ 

... ........... .. .. .... , ............ ., .............. -

lt .................... ; .. .,U.U. - ........ .... ...... .... ...... ........ 

-., ........ ...,.,, .. .. 

..., ... , .r • ,... ,.._..fll .._,_..ta.._ t. .... 

................ ..,... ..................... ..... ...... )#, .... ,• 

HARRY H. WOODRIN '.l 

...... .,., ... 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuant to'E.o. 1352§ ·, ... 

~ : < ,, • •
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       1,273,357
<SECURITIES>                                   219,832
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,733
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      9,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,543,541
<PP&E>                                       2,612,725
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,042,461
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,113,805
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,476
<BONDS>                                         88,318
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,727
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,833,284
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,113,805
<SALES>                                        119,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               209,379
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               138,589
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,790
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,340)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,450
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
**U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**Washington, D.C. 20549FORM 10-QSB

(x) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR15 (d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31,2006

( )TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR15 (d)OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT COMMISSION OF 1934

for the Transition period March 31, 2006

Commission file number 0-9951

**ADVANCED OXYGEN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**-------------------------------------------------------------(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Delaware                                             91-1143622-----------------------                             ----------------------(State ofIncorporation)              (IRS Employer Identification No.)

C/O Crossfield, Inc., 133 W 13th Street, NewYork, NY 10011-------------------------------------------------------(Address of principal executive offices)

C/O Crossfield, Inc. (212)-727-7085---------------------------------------------------(Issuer's telephone number)

Check whether the issuer (1) has filed allreports required to be filled by Section 13 or 15(d)of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for suchshorter period that the Registrantwas required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject tosuch filing requirements forthe past 90 days. Yes (X) No

As of March 31, 2006 there were 46,973,585issued shares and 45,853,585
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 17, 2020

No. 04-19-00479-CV

EX PARTE R.A.L., JR.,

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019W0563

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

On March 4, 2020, appellee filed a motion for rehearing. After consideration, the motion 

is DENIED.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-60580, 333-03895, 333-95127 and
333-95129) and Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-19195) of our report dated
February 28, 2002 (March 21, 2002 with respect to Note M) on our audit of the
financial statements included in the 2001 annual report on Form 10-K/A(Amendment
No. 2) of Life Medical Sciences, Inc.

Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
April 8, 2002
---REr1n·:-A676T5 I I . ' .. 

.a.tim 1 

Chl•t• Cryptopai>hio ... teriel BNnoh 

8IGIHFO 

az.i-. 22 Jlaroh 19"5 

~HO 

1. ••PQn9lbll1ty tor editing the llcntbly liltormational Doo'111l811t. SlGIBFO. 

Jaq been truia.teJTed he Cryptographlo •aterlel Branch to Cammm1cat1on Seour1t," 

Ira.nob. 

I. Pllblloa.tim m the lat of eaoh mcm.th h planned., !he tollow1n: aohedule 

ba9 'been prapare41 

· •• 1leadlin• tor aul:a1ae1m ot artioleis 1io ba :lnoludecl in a glftl\ edition 

•f' 8mDIF01 lat 07 ot prmm• aanth (SO da:ya 1J1 adTanaa ot pabl.ioat1m). 

b. All artiol" to be edited 1n Cammm1oat1m Seoul"ity Bro.nab mid thoa• 

'ano~ng poU.ay to be forwarded to Chiet, l•ou..rity D1na1on, ror approyal 1 8th ._,. ot predou. mnth. 

o. .Artlol•• to be returned to Ccmmmloaticm. Security Branch, with aorHOtiaq notach lath 4"7 or prnioua manth. 

4. 1'1Da1 dratte and ~ to be f"Ol"ftrded to Production Secrtion. Cryptographio 'Ml.terhl Bran.ob, 'to bo printeda 12th day ~ prniou m.cmth. 

•• Pu.b11aat1on to be oompleted «ad di•trl.h.atlon. to o~ncea 1•t ot tbe 

-=nth. 

1. Fmld:lng oanO\'IJ"rea.oe by Cryptographic 'Materiel Bramh and approval by 

Ch1et. 8eour11;y Didalm, the next illsue ot IIGIIFO t. aohedul9d tor pu'bl1oat1m on 

1 Jlq 1945. Aocordlngly, the 4ee.dl1n• tar 1111bl:daslon ot articles for that edition 

l• 1 April. 

'• It another branoh d•lr" to •u'talt an 14• tor 1111 artiol• and havo the 

IQ't!al• wr1ttm by Cmmnleation 8eour1ty Bnnoh,. Pu.blloatlaut and Indoctr1nat1on teuon. the id• -.t be aut.d:t1:ed •ix waeb in lldiranoe ot publication. 

A l1A JI -1. Eaoh bran.oh will be napon•1ble tor the content ot the artiol•• it whdt.. 

~jCS.,..,...ioatlon Beauriqr JJranoh wS.11 be r•pm•ible tor the •vl• ~all articlee. 

{ : tluding th• word.1Dg. 

I 

1 

- I 

~· 

=\.~ IS'-"...!, 

...... " :n 9i' ·- Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-09-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 
,,,.., 

·-J 

--... 

' -· 

I. Cornapmclmoe r•latlng to artiol• publ11hed in. &mIIFO 11111 'be routed. "° the originating 'bnm.oh• tor aot1on. 

'· Ccmaurrano• 1n. the above plan• la !'•quested. 

•I• 

J.1ohard t. l>Olming 

Major. 81gnal Oorps 

IPlll...8.&. kt 261 

-

-------. -~--
Summary Sheet of Director Compensation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SUMMARY SHEET OF DIRECTOR COMPENSATION 
 The following summary sets forth current annual
rates of cash and equity compensation for non-management directors, effective immediately following the May 12, 2011 Board meeting. 
  

									
	 Compensation Item
	  	Prior
Compensation	 	  	New
Compensation	 
	 Cash Compensation
	  				  			
	 Board Retainer
	  	$	50,000	  	  	$	50,000	  
	 Audit Committee
	  				  			
	 Chair Retainer
	  	$	18,000	  	  	$	18,000	  
	 Member Retainer
	  	$	8,000	  	  	$	8,000	  
	 Compensation Committee
	  				  			
	 Chair Retainer
	  	$	15,000	  	  	$	15,000	  
	 Member Retainer
	  	$	6,000	  	  	$	6,000	  
	 Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	  				  			
	 Chair Retainer
	  	$	10,000	  	  	$	10,000	  
	 Member Retainer
	  	$	5,000	  	  	$	5,000	  
	 Equity Compensation - Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units
	  				  			
	 Independent Chair Retainer (including Director Retainer)
	  	$	260,000	  	  	$	290,000	  
	 Director Retainer
	  	$	110,000	  	  	$	125,000	  

 Directors may defer their cash compensation by participating in the Company’s Deferred Compensation Program,
Effective as of December 1, 2010 (filed February 24, 2011 as Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Form 10-K). 
 Directors may receive
the equity component of their compensation in restricted stock or restricted stock units (RSUs). In either case, the awards have a 12-month vesting period ending on the day preceding the next annual meeting of shareholders. Vesting accelerates in
the event of death, disability or a change in control of the Company. The number of shares is calculated by dividing the dollar value by the closing price of the Company’s stock on the grant date. RSUs are settled in shares of common stock and
earn dividend equivalents at a 20% discount to the market price of Company stock on the dividend payment date. Directors may elect to defer settlement of the RSU award for 2 to 10 years after the grant date. 

The Company pays for travel expenses the directors incur to attend Board meetings. 
 Our employee directors do not receive additional compensation for their Board service.
99-1225.

#### Provateare v. Hausman Co.

Cuyahoga App. No. 74061. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellees’ motion to strike appellant’s notice of appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to strike notice of appeal be, and hereby is, granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-01-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-03-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-01-1999
<CASH>                                           8,795
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    209,028
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               240,596
<PP&E>                                         457,994
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 620,314
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,657
<BONDS>                                        224,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           167
<OTHER-SE>                                     276,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   620,314
<SALES>                                        511,483
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               511,483
<CGS>                                          302,843
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  302,843
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,766
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        8,245
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,813
<EPS-BASIC>                                     1.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.12


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                           5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from CENTURY
PROPERTIES  FUND XVI 2000 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                               0000351931
<NAME>                              CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVI
<MULTIPLIER>                                           1,000


<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                      APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   165
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                              0
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                           0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                16,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                         8,646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         8,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                      0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                7,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   0
<OTHER-SE>                                               910
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           8,517
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1,565
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       1,431
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       301
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                            0
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                        0
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             134
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0.96 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
# CE2004088EN.01046602.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/466 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/466

---

(2004/C 88 E/0480)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3521/03

by Anne Van Lancker (PSE) to the Commission

(25 November 2003)

Subject:   Human rights violations in the USA

Subject:

Fernando González, Rene González, Gerardo Hernández, Ramón Labanino and Antonio Guerrero are five Cubans currently imprisoned in the USA for, amongst other things, conspiracy to commit espionage and conspiracy to commit murder. They had, in fact, infiltrated Cuban organisations in Miami in order to prevent terrorist attacks on Cuba. The trial of the five Cubans was held in Miami. With a Cuban immigrant community largely hostile to the Cuban Government, the city cannot be considered a neutral venue for such a trial. Holding the trial there thus constitutes a violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the US Constitution. They were convicted without any evidence. On the basis of this information, 105 British MPs signed a motion calling for a review of the case. In addition, the wives of two of those convicted who have already been in prison for five years (Gerardo Hernández and Rene González) have, to date, been denied the right to visit their husbands. Amnesty International has already condemned the denial of visiting rights.

Is the Commission aware of the above? Will the Commission bring this matter to the attention of the US Administration in the context of its relations with the USA?

Answer given by Mr Patten on behalf of the Commission

(15 January 2004)

(15 January 2004)

The Union has taken no position with regard to the specific case referred to by the Honourable Member. As a general rule, the Union does not intervene in individual cases except where the death penalty is invoked, and where the case falls under the guidelines established by the Council's Common Position of 29 June 1998.

---
INITIALS 

DATE 

FROM NAME OR TITLE 

CIRCULATE 

CONCUR· 

REN CE 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY 

ACTION 

NOTE AND RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

~ WD ~· AGO FORll 1841 895 · 16~7-l u ••• •oYEANMENT PllNTING omCE 

P roved for Release by NSA on 07-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
' :' i