alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
DECEMBER 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY
BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          17,196
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,036
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 4,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    108,414
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,502
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,941
<LOANS>                                        136,889
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,603
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 292,078
<DEPOSITS>                                     248,183
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             10,809
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           775
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 292,078
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,353
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                6,408
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,267
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                20,028
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,419
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,750
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,278
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,465
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,081
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,081
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    18.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    18.11
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.45
<LOANS-NON>                                        562
<LOANS-PAST>                                       587
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     71
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,306
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      315
<RECOVERIES>                                       359
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,603
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,603
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-83,439-01

EX PARTE TRINA GEVETTE SANDERS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 14-CR-3423-83-1 IN THE 212TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GALVESTON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of possession of

codeine and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment. She did not appeal her conviction. 

Applicant contends that newly discovered laboratory analysis in this case reflects that she did

not possess any codeine. 

Applicant’s claim is supported by the habeas record. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte

Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).
2

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 14-CR-3423 in the 212 District Court of th

Galveston County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Galveston

County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary

bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: July 29, 2015

Do not publish
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

LLOYD JAMES DARON, JR., Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 19-0108 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2015-144027-001 

The Honorable Joan M. Sinclair, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney’s Office, Phoenix

By Frankie Y. Jones

Counsel for Respondent

Law Office of Stephen M. Johnson, Phoenix

By Stephen M. Johnson 

Counsel for Petitioner

FILED 9-17-2019
STATE v. DARON

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, and 

Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Lloyd James Daron, Jr. seeks review of the 

superior court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, filed 

pursuant to Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1. This is petitioner’s 

first petition.

¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will 

not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post-conviction 

relief. State v. Gutierrez, 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s 

burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying 

the petition for post-conviction relief. See State v. Poblete, 227 Ariz. 537, 

538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of 

discretion on review).

¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the superior 

court’s order denying the petition for post-conviction relief, and the 

petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse 

of discretion.

¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13361-13362]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05688]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2678-006-CA]


Pacific Gas and Electric Company; Notice of Availability of 
Environmental Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office 
of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for a subsequent 
license for the Narrows No. 2 Transmission Line Project and has 
prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA). The project occupies 1.28 
acres of public land managed by the United States Army Corps of 
Engineers and provides service from the Yuba County Water Agency's 
Narrows No. 2 Powerhouse (a component of FERC Project No. 2246), in 
Yuba County, to PG&E's Narrows No. 2 Substation, in Nevada County.
    The EA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental 
effects of the project and alternatives and concludes that licensing 
the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would 
not constitute a major federal action that would significantly

[[Page 13362]]

affect the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is available for review at the Commission in the 
Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket 
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to 
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b7f1f2e5f4f8d9dbded9d2e4c2c7c7d8c5c3f7d1d2c5d499d0d8c1"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d69093849599b8babfb8b385a3a6a6b9a4a296b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, 
(202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances 
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC 
Online Support.
    For further information, contact Jim Fargo at (202) 502-6095.

     Dated: March 4, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05688 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 23.2

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

The Board of Directors
Pacific State Bank
Reedsport, Oregon:

     We consent to the use of our report  dated June 27,  1997,  relating to the
financial statements of Pacific State Bank, included herein and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Portland, Oregon
   
September 17, 1997
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                           821,498
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  4,948,886
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,770,384
<PP&E>                                        96,206,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,145,259
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                98,831,888
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          7,063,733
<BONDS>                                       46,898,904
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                          45,501
<OTHER-SE>                                    44,823,750
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  98,831,888
<SALES>                                        5,521,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               5,543,783
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  3,631,585
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               940,786
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  971,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              971,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     971,412
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .21


</TABLE>
NO

.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

FC BACKGROUND, LLC

,

Petitioner
, v.

LEE FRITZE
, Respondent

.

On Petition for Review from the Fifth Court of Appeals

Dallas , Texas No. 05

- 17

- 00277

- CV

PETITIONER’S OPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW

Petitioner

, FC Background, LLC

, ask s the Court to extend the time to file its

Petition for Review

.

1. Petitioner is FC Background, LLC ; respondent is Lee Fritze

.

2. This motion is filed within the 15

- day period to file a motion to

extend the time to file a petition for review, as required by Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 53.7(f).

3. Respondent oppose s this motion.

4. The Court has the authority under T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 53.7 to grant

petitioner additional time to file a petition for re view

. FILED 17-1053 12/22/2017 1:32 PM tex-21463345 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK2

5. The 5th Court of Appeals issued its judgment in FC Background, LLC

v. Lee Fritze

, C ause No. 05

- 1 7

- 00 277

- CV, on November 16 , 201 7

.

6. Petitioner’s petition for review is due to be filed on January 2 , 201 8

.

7. Petitioner request s an additional 30 days to file the petition for review,

extending the time to February 1, 2018

.

9. No extension has been previously granted to extend the time to file the

petition for review.

5. Petitioner need s additional time to file its brief because counsel fo r

Petitioner will be out of the state for the holidays

.

6. Respondent oppose s this 30

- day extension.

PRAYER

For these reasons, petitioner asks the Court to grant an extension of time to

file the petition for review until February 2, 2018

.

Respectfully submitted,

D UNN S HEEHAN LLP

/s/ Cari B. LaSala William D. Dunn Texas Bar No. 24002023 ddunn@dunnsheehan.com Cari B. LaSala Texas Bar No. 24087890 clasala@dunnsheehan.com3 3400 Carlisle St., Suite 200 Dallas, Texas 75204 (214) 855

- 0077 (Phone) (214) 866

- 0070 (Fax)

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELL ANT

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

C ounsel for Petitioner

, Cari LaSala

, contacted counsel for Respondent

, Robin Foret on December 2 2 , 201 7

. Respondent oppose s the requested extension of time for 30 days for filing FC Background’s Petition for Review.

/s/ Cari B. LaSala

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify on December 22, 2017 I served a copy of Petitioner’s O pposed Motion to Extend Time to File Petition for Review on Respondent by electr onic filing

.

/s/ Cari B. LaSala
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANICAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           8,152
<SECURITIES>                                     1,521
<RECEIVABLES>                                      104
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,833
<PP&E>                                              12
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (1)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,708
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            2,250
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,994
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   609
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      655
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (46)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        49
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (95)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (198)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (293)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.38)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                          Consent of Ernst & Young LLP

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on Form
10-K of GalaGen Inc. of our report dated February 25, 2000, included in the
1999 Annual Report to Shareholders of GalaGen Inc.

Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of GalaGen Inc.
listed in Item 14(a). This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

WE CONSENT TO THE INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE IN THE REGISTRATION STATEMENTS
ON FORM S-8 (NOS. 333-05415, 333-05417, 333-27031 AND 333-33357) PERTAINING
TO THE GALAGEN INC. 1992 STOCK PLAN, EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN,
NON-STATUTORY STOCK OPTION AGREEMENTS AND 1997 INCENTIVE PLAN AND IN THE
REGISTRATION STATEMENTS ON FORM S-3 (NOS. 333-71883, 333-64489 AND 333-41151)
OF GALAGEN INC. AND IN THE RELATED PROSPECTUS OF OUR REPORT DATED FEBRUARY
25, 2000, WITH RESPECT TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF GALAGEN INC. INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER
31, 1999 AND THE RELATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE INCLUDED HEREIN, FILED
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.


                                          Ernst & Young LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
March 24, 2000

-----------------------


                                       24
... 

' 

REF ID:A58475 CO~if"ifJEHTiAL e 

USCIB: 4.2/29 

19 November 1954 

CeNFH»li'f J:All 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIBEC: 

Subject: Proposed Revision of USCIB Directive Number 5. 

l. There is enclosed for consideration by vote sheet a proposed 

revision of USCIB Directive Number 5 unanimously recommended by the 

USCIB Security Connnittee with which recommendation I concur except 

insofar as paragraph placement is concerned. I think the revision 

should become the first sentence of paragraph 1. 

2. It is requested that your views concerning this proposal be 

entered upon the attached vote sheet which should be returned to this 

office by the close of business 30 November 1954· 

3. THE ENCLOSURE WITH THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS 

INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED FOR CG!.INT. 

Enclosure 

SECCCl-1 # 016 

dtd 16 Nov 1954 

USCIB: 4.2/29 

p in, • • avy 

ive Secretary, USCIB 

COHFIDEN"fl=4L 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-11-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B 
.. ... REF ID:A58475 CONF1'FJENfl~t • 

SEC #016 

16 November 1954 

00NFIBEN!lili 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE SECRETARY, USCIB 

Subject: USCIB Directive Number 5 

1. To avoid possible misinterpretation of the intent of 

USCIB Directive Number 5, the USCIB Security Committee recommends that a paragraph be added to the Directive stating: 

119. Provisions of this Directive are applicable 

to persons being considered for clearance and 

access to Category III and Category II CCMINT. 

Minimum investigation and clearance standards 

!or access to Category I C()}.1INT will be in 

accordance with each USCIB member's existing 

clearance procedures for access to classified 

materials of the same classification." 

2. THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE 

INFORMATION AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS PROVIDED 

EXPRESSLY FOR COM.INT. 

(SIGNED) 

H. C. SIMMONS 

Lt. Colonel, USAF 

Acting Chairman,, SECCOM 

Enclosure with USCIB 4.2/29 dtd 19 Nov 1954. 

CONFIBE1~'f/AL
Order entered September 27, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 19 - 00506 - CV IN THE INTEREST OF C .V.L., A CHILD On Appeal from the 304th Judicial District Court

Da llas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. JC - 17 - 01086 - W



### O RDER Before the Court is the State’s unopposed “First Motion to Extend Time to File Brief.” We GRANT the motion and ORDER the brief received on September 26, 2019 filed as of the date of this order

. Per this Court’s September 10, 2019 notice letter, this appeal will be submitted without oral argument on October 3, 2019. /s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA

- KIPNESS JUSTICE
• REF ID:A58628 • 1-~I DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, O, C. 

Dr. Herbert J. sanborn ~b:lt.1 Ottice 

Libr&Z'J' ot CODgl"988 

lllshingt,on 25, D. c. 

Dear Dr. Sanborn1 

IN REPL.Y REFER TO 

12 Pebrua17 1951 

'l'hank 10U tor bringing to 111' att;erition the torthcomiag exhibit 

ot rapid aethode ot tranUd.aeion ot doowaenta in ecmneotion with t.he 

meeting ct the .Alleriea.n Doouaetit&Uon Inltitut.t on Pebrtt&1'7 15. 

Copiee of the literature whiob rou sent• have 'been diatributAd 

within our am Agency, aid additional oopi•a ban been fO!'W&l'dl4 t• 

the appropriate ottic•• within th• Depal't.menta ot t.b• Arfq, the Hav, 

and t.h• Air Poree. 

I aa ve17 eor17 that. Pl"••BUN of dut7 prnuta ., at.tendann at 

the lecture to be gt:nn by Dr. Ennl, &Del at tJae gemral. aeaeion ot 

the Inatitute. NI J'OU indioat.a, the exhibit ia ot t.iae~ 1ntereet. 

ill oonmction w1 th the PNPo•d diapersal of QoYerment agencies /1 &rd 

I UL certain that. all who at.terd wUl gain a great deal ot useful and 

pertinent. int01"11&\10, 

Please convq a greeting fltoa me to Dr. lralJa and tell him. I 

hope to see bill aametime aoon at. one or the Book Club mMtinga. 

With cordial greetirage to 7011, I a, 

S1ncerel.7 :rour•. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-10-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e ,, 

\