alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
e REF ID:A52168. 

c - 0 

p 

y 

Memorandum For Major Walter C. Ellis (Room 3431) 

R & D Div., OCSigO 

April 9, 1936 

Subject: Modification in Converter Type M-134-T2 

Improvement in Prior Patent Application 

Serial No. 682,096 

Invention of Mr. Wm. F. Friedman 

1. Reference your memo. of 4-5-36 and Mr. Friedman's 

specification and drawing submitted with his memo. of 3-23-36. 

2. This is an improvement on the subject-ma.tter of the 

above application, Ser. No. 6S2,096, which application has gone 

through an extended prosecution before the United States Patent 

Office with the result that the subject-metter has been found 

patentable and a considerable number of claims have been allowed. 

3. Since the prior art has been qptte fully developed in 

connection with the prosecution of the said application, Serial No. 

6'!2,096, it can be stated with reasonable assurance that the latent 

improvement appears to be patentable and a new patent application 

should be filed in the Patent Office to protect the improvement. In 

view of the relation of the improvement to the prior application, 

the new patent application should be filed with reasonable promptness. 

All papers returned. 

Charles A. Rowe, 

Patents Section, Signal Corps. 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 
.... · .. : .. :·· :'· . : 

~: · .... · ... ~:· . .; 

·.· .... 

.. .. · 

REF ID:A52r685 

c 

0 

p 

I 

Uemorandwa lor 1111.jor Wolter C. Ell1s (Room .'.1431) 

R & D Div., OCSisO 

April 9, 19.)6 

Subject• Modification 1n ConTerter T7~e Y-134-T2 

Improvem&nt 1n Prior Patent Ap?lication 

Serial Ho. 682,096 

Invention of Mr. Wm. F. Friedman 

l. RG.t"er~nce your .::iemo. of 4-5-36 !m'i lir. Frit:dmt-.:u' 3 

:i&Jec!!1cation 1md drawirii;; ::.-ubm.ittW. with h.is !l!.e.mo. ·:>f 3-t3-36.· 

2. This 1~ an improvement on th~ 3ubj:ct-~atter of the 

above B.£>plicati0l'!, Ser. ?Io. 6821096, which a.pμlice+..ion ha.., gone 

through un extended. proso<.."Ution be1'ore tr.c United States Patent 

:)ffice with ·the resul"t that ti1e s-.ibje:ct-!".:r..tter haa bei:n found 

~n3.tentable and r! ~onsiders.ble· number :>i' cl1iim-:i ha,Te heen allowed. 

3. Since thu o:-ior a.rt baa been ql)ite fully developed in 

connection 1rith the pros~cut1on o.L' the :saiC. application, -Serial No. 

6a2,096, it can be stated ·.•·1th reasonablt.: :?.3:>ura:c.ce the.t the latent 

1m ro•eme t a· ears t be ate table and a new ?&tent ap;>l1cat1on 

Bbould be !"1 l!d in the ?a.tent u.fi'icc to )rotec- t.htJ .iru~l!"OVe!llent.. In 

view of the relation of the im::>:-ove:mcnt to the prior a.p;>l1cnt.111n, 

the nw ,P'itent a.i)plication should !le tiled ;vi th reEtsoneblt.! pro11ptr.ess. 

All papers roturned. 

Charles A. Bowe, 

Patents Section, Sitrnal Corps •
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-24-00201-CV

MALOLITO INVESTMENTS, LLC, SELECT MONEY MANAGEMENT, LLC,

BRUCE KAMINSKI, AND KANDI LATRECE DANIELS

v.

NOEHMI GARCIA

On Appeal from the

96th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 096-344317-23

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, vacates the trial court’s judgment and dismisses the case. The Court orders the 

trial judgment dated December 13, 2023 VACATED, and the appeal DISMISSED. Costs

of the appeal are adjudged against appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 16, 2024
-

REF ID:A40252 

• 

77'l'll CONGRESS 

2DSESSION S.2281 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES \ 

FEnRuARY 17 (legislative day, FE!Ul~ABY 13)~ Mr. v AN N UYS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and __ refe~ed.tc:> ~he ~mmittee_ on ~e ~udicia~. -· ....... , . . .. . 

~ . . . ·• - . . . . . . . . .... ---.....-----.,.,.........,.....--- ________ ·--·· --· 

A- BILL-. 

To penalize the divulging of the contents of confidential 

Government documents. 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

6 

1-

8 

9 

10 

11 

Be it enacted l1g the Senate af!d House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

That whoever, without authority, shall willfully and knowingly furnish, communicate, divulge, or publish to any person, 

in whole or in part, copies or the contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of any file, instrument, letter, memorandum, book, pamphlet, paper, document, manu8cript, map, ~ .. ' 

picture, plan, record, or other Writing in the custody of the . 

United States, or of any agency, officer, or employee thereof, 

declared to be secret or confidential by statute, or declared 

to be secret or confidential by any rule or regulation of any 
REF ID:A40252 

• • 

1 department or agency of the United States of which he has 

2 knowledge or which has been published in the Code of Fed3 eral Regulations or in the Federal Register, shall be fined 

' 

4 not more than $5,000 or imprisoned for not more than two 

5 years, or both. The provisions of this section are in addition 

6 to, and do not supersede, other laws. 

7 SEO. 2. The head of any executive department, inde-

:· 8- _pendent. es.tablishment,.- or. other agency. .may auth-0riz~ the .... 

-9 ·disclosure of infonnation in.· the ctistody of his depamnent, . ·• 

· · 10 ·:establishment, or agency to particular persons or .classes of 

11 persons or to the public generally. The provisions of section 

12 1 of this Act shall not apply to disclosures so authorized. 

. . . . . -· ............ _. ... . . .. ... : . ·-.... .. 

. . ... .. . . ... . .... 
• 

REF ID:A40252 

77TB CONGRESS 

2D8aSION S.2281 

A BILL 

To penalize the divulging of the contents of 

confidential Government documents. 

By Mr. v AN NUY8 

FEBBUABY 17 (legislative day, FEBRUARY 18), 1942 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000353191
<NAME> NORTH VALLEY BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          11,288
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             302
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                15,400
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     18,524
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          32,398
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            33,758
<LOANS>                                        203,030
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,932
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 297,110
<DEPOSITS>                                     259,870
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,727
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        10,319
<OTHER-SE>                                      21,194
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 297,110
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,428
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,005
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,433
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,001
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,001
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            6,432
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      555
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  16
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,725
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,887
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,887
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,063
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.67
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,263
<LOANS-PAST>                                       217
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,902
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      747
<RECOVERIES>                                       222
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,932
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00455-CR

Derrick Lamont White

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1417156D)

November 17, 2016

Opinion by Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Bonnie Sudderth________________

 Justice Bonnie Sudderth
NUMBER 13-16-00162-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI C EDINBURG

AMERICAN SURGICAL ASSISTANTS,

INC. D/B/A AMERICAN SURGICAL 

PROFESSIONALS, Appellant,

v.

JUAN JOHNNY DE DIOS VILLEGAS, ET AL., Appellees.

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE REPORTER’S RECORD

Before Justices Garza, Perkes, and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the reporter’s failure to file the record. The 

reporter’s record in this matter was originally due on June 20, 2016. The reporter has 

previously requested and received three extensions of time to file the record. The 
2

reporter has filed a fourth extension requesting an additional 45 days to file the reporter’s 

record. 

The Court, having fully examined and considered the extensions previously 

granted in this cause, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, an order should be 

entered. The Court looks with disfavor upon the delay caused by the reporter’s failure 

to have filed the record in this matter. 

Reporter, Sandra Chavez, is hereby ORDERED to file the reporter’s record in this 

Court on or before December 19, 2016. No further motions for extension of time will be 

entertained by the Court. If the reporter fails to file the record within the foregoing 

specified period of time, the Court will act appropriately to avoid further delay and to 

preserve the parties’ rights. TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3 (a)(2). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed 

the 17th day of November, 2016.
REF ID:A68732 -/ 

7 July 1950 

Editor, 

T>w Nash:l.ngt.on Poat, ',Ja~hington, D.c. 

Sirs 

Since th9 State Dep~rt. haa seem tit to J:"Gtraiu rroa dignityiJlt 

oven by a reply the reoe~ protest of tllJ u.s.s.a. Nl.ative to our us• 

Of &ircr&fi to a_;read potatoe 'buga OVtr the fields under U.S.~l.f\. control, 

I •t.d.' the !ollowin!l proposed draft. ot a auitable reply, tor rour 

CQl\eideration and possible publication. 

ttfht Ocmirnnent ot the United m:.at • notes witb chagrin that. 

ti. •~llent. .1nt4ll.ljgenoe eerri.oa ()f the Govemmer&. ot the u.s.s.n. 

baa euoceeded in dieoowring 1nll\lb1taola mdeno• ot tbl netarioua 

act.ion by ihe United t;t.atea Oovern.mert. in caueing the d1689dne.tion 

by u.s. air'Qra.tt.- ot inaeata chargfld with n.tiaeion ot dea1r.royizg thl 

pot.a.to croJ)tl which otherWiae aigtt. haw b.m hantlated trca taralande under tr.~; .r:.n. csontrol. The GOYerment o! the Unit&d !ltatu 

rear•U'u.11¥ adaita thfilt tm •id insect.• are thoe• p:rodUced 1n 

quantity by ita J:'lppef# Oar•mnent 11r Japan am are kno"'1 aa 

Ja.paneee beeUee• not potato bugo. Tho COVS"zacit or the United 

St.a.tea reluctart.l7 mst. in:l.icate that its aensoriou• cmnre or 

action was undertakm only aa a Mo:re humanit.arian measure :1n 

retaliation tor too mllita:rr terl"OJ'istic courRe pur.wed rooen~ 

by tho U.D.!:;.R., in oausing guided W.s3loe of u.0.s.R. origin to 

d1mmm.1nate, locally t8l"ID8d. 1 gn,yets• ( sClf!Mi.tinles pronounced • 0n.vats• 1 

or'g!O'ts') ave?" the groums occupied by tb. Amy-lav.r Country Club, 

in .1trllngton Comty• adjacvnt to Y.aahil1J~ton_. one or t.he results ot 

which has l>Mn the ~ ot MYere psyohoneuroess among 

higheat level offi.ee.n ot the u.s. Ar•~v, NaY.Vl 8lld ;ctr ll"oree l'tK>38 

e&l"nest ettarte to ap:;roach par are being nal :Jtied by the 

deplorable aolXlit.ion of' the put.ting &"601196 oaulS&d by the 

depredations or oa.id ~ta. 

:tilll• f. Frie&iian 

424 Jfort.h Qeorp llaaon Drive 

AJ"lingt on, Virginia 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-20643

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS HUMBERTO ARREDONDO-SILVA, also known as Luis Humberto

Arredondo, also known as Luis Humberto Arredondo Silva, also known as Luis

Arredondo-Silva, also known as Luis Humberto Arredonodo Silva,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:09-CR-206-1

Before KING, GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Humberto

Arredondo-Silva has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Arredondo-Silva has

filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and

Arredondo-Silva’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 19, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-20643 Document: 00511208997 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/19/2010
No. 09-20643

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

Case: 09-20643 Document: 00511208997 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/19/2010
9 Sec. 1004 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ACT

(6) The term ‘‘hazardous waste generation’’ means the act or process of producing hazardous waste.(7) The term ‘‘hazardous waste management’’ means the systematic control of the collection, source separation, storage, transportation, processing, treatment, recovery, and disposal of hazardous wastes. (8) For purposes of Federal financial assistance (other than rural communities assistance), the term ‘‘implementation’’ does notinclude the acquisition, leasing, construction, or modification of facilities or equipment or the acquisition, leasing, or improvement of

land.(9) The term ‘‘intermunicipal agency’’ means an agency established by two or more municipalities with responsibility for planning or administration of solid waste. (10) The term ‘‘interstate agency’’ means an agency of two or more municipalities in different States, or an agency established by two or more States, with authority to provide for the management of solid wastes and serving two or more municipalities located in

different States.(11) The term ‘‘long-term contract’’ means, when used in relation to solid waste supply, a contract of sufficient duration to assure the viability of a resource recovery facility (to the extent that such viability depends upon solid waste supply). (12) The term ‘‘manifest’’ means the form used for identifying the quantity, composition, and the origin, routing, and destinationof hazardous waste during its transportation from the point of generation to the point of disposal, treatment, or storage. (13) The term ‘‘municipality’’ (A) means a city, town, borough, county, parish, district, or other public body created by or pursuant to State law, with responsibility for the planning or administration of solid waste management, or an Indian tribe or authorized tribalorganization or Alaska Native village or organization, and (B) includes any rural community or unincorporated town or village or any other public entity for which an application for assistance is made by a State or political subdivision thereof. (14) The term ‘‘open dump’’ means any facility or site where solid waste is disposed of which is not a sanitary landfill which meets the criteria promulgated under section 4004 and which is not a facility for disposal of hazardous waste. (15) The term ‘‘person’’ means an individual, trust, firm, joint stock company, corporation (including a government corporation), partnership, association, State, municipality, commission, political subdivision of a State, or any interstate body and shall include each department, agency, and instrumentality of the United States.(16) The term ‘‘procurement item’’ means any device, good, substance, material, product, or other item whether real or personalproperty which is the subject of any purchase, barter, or other exchange made to procure such item. (17) The term ‘‘procuring agency’’ means any Federal agency, or any State agency or agency of a political subdivision of a State which is using appropriated Federal funds for such procurement, or any person contracting with any such agency with respect to work performed under such contract. Q:\COMP\ENVIR2\RCRA

December 31, 2002
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000353191
<NAME> NORTH VALLEY BANCORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          13,193
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         197,635
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                13,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     11,553
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          40,315
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            41,567
<LOANS>                                        165,721
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,658
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 253,540
<DEPOSITS>                                     227,266
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,857
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,814
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 253,540
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,674
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,036
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,710
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,040
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,040
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,670
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      255
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  19
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,676
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,397
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,397
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,004
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.52
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,384
<LOANS-PAST>                                         6
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,325
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      146
<RECOVERIES>                                        14
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,658
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.7


                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
Technocom Limited:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated March 30, 1999,
relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Technocom Limited and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three year period ended December 31, 1998, which report appears in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 of PLD
Telekom Inc.

Our report dated March 30, 1999 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations, has a net capital
deficiency and a working capital deficiency, and does not presently have
sufficient funds on hand to meet its current obligations. These factors raise
substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might
result from the outcome of this uncertainty.



                                                  KPMG
                                                  Chartered Accountants

Dublin, Ireland
March 30, 1999