alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 204 (Thursday, October 22, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 64050]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-26865]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Eleventh Meeting: RTCA Tactical Operations Committee (TOC)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Eleventh RTCA Tactical Operations Committee Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Eleventh RTCA Tactical Operations Committee meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held November 12th from 9:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, Tel: (202) 330-0655.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org or Trin 
Mitra, TOC Secretary, RTCA, Inc., tmitra@rtca.org, (202) 330-0655.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Tactical Operations Committee. The 
agenda will include the following:

Thursday, November 12, 2015

1. Opening of Meeting/Introduction of TOC Members--Co Chairs Dale 
Wright and Bryan Quigley
2. Official Statement of Designated Federal Official--Elizabeth Ray
3. Approval of July 21, 2015 Meeting Summary
4. FAA Update--Elizabeth Ray
5. Recommendation on Final NOTAM Search Implementation
6. Update and Draft Recommendations from Airport Construction Task 
Group
7. Update and Draft Recommendations from National Procedure Assessment 
Task Group
8. FAA Response to Previous TOC Recommendations: Caribbean Operations, 
GPS Adjacent Band Compatibility and Class B Airspace
9. Status Update from Regional Task Groups
10. Update on the NextGen Advisory Committee (NAC)
11. Update on the VOR Minimum Operating Network (MON) Program
12. Anticipated Issues for TOC consideration and action at the next 
meeting
13. Other Business
14. Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Plenary information will be 
provided upon request. Persons wishing to present statements or obtain 
information should contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may present a 
written statement to the committee at any time.

    Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on October 19, 2015.
Latasha Robinson,
Management & Program Analyst, Next Generation, Enterprise Support 
Services Division, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-26865 Filed 10-21-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                              SEP-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                             722
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,354
<INVENTORY>                                      2,619
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,087
<PP&E>                                           1,643
<DEPRECIATION>                                     651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,493
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,016
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              260
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           211
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,372
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,493
<SALES>                                          7,012
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,628
<CGS>                                            6,159
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,182
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   491
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  35
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (126)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (431)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (431)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.07)
        

</TABLE>
-- - ' -- • \ ..- -,._;i...: -- -_ _.,. _ __._ ,_- -

-

l. to MCOrdance v1th •1'Rbone eobV«rU.t1UJ1 l MC4 l'CIU. 

bimVith (~lomre 1) & -., ot • ~ *Hi&* 41.W 1!9 

11•...a:.r JS~ tl"OD «l.tl' O&laoel ~Uig, 1lho ill ~ 184 !JAbon 

Ottieor at \be ~· 

~ 

ta~ 

a. 

'Vlll'1owl 

9* official. 

PMrl lmbor 

~nta 

il:rffft\ptiont 

plblltbed co 

4o 

thtt 

DO\ 

~ 

i.Del'-'• ~ -1~ 

... u.p. ~ ~l" ~l. lo tar .. 1 - .... , \be 

~ at ti. feJo •tUllQP nt-.rrod. ilo 111 ~ l. 2-a 11111t1tt ~ 

JUbl.i.lhed· ~ ba a>ot ~ ~ nf'•r.nc•• to tho !'oJo -•'8SC 

W ft.u \!:e Mn itMlf ~ llOt ~ bl llOQO bitJtory Witten &Uice 

tM el.OIJG tit World ., n u4 J/IO/t# ta \M plbUc ,,.., n. 

J. lowv•r, thSte i.. 'bun at. ltUt _. 41.aalol\lre er •lalt" 

Oil .... ifoJo .uaaga-~ OM ~ Dl"n ~ '• 'bt'oGdea.tt.f MWn ,_,,.. qo, .. ~ad 'by x.ea.ur. ... 

... Vt 1f1ll &tla)' Ci~ wq ~t tie no util - -.:i- trm. 

• :r.1"' 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-09-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 21


                           Subsidiaries of the Company

1.       Response Ability Systems, Inc.; incorporated in New Jersey.

2.       Emergency Response Systems, Inc.; incorporated in Delaware; also does
         business in the state of California under the name Personal Emergency
         Response Systems, Inc.

3.       Organization for Enhanced Capability, Inc.; incorporated in
         Massachusetts.

4.       In-Home Health, Inc.; incorporated in Ohio.

5.       Response Security Monitoring, LLC; formed in Delaware.

6.       Response Security Services, LLC; formed in Delaware.

7.       Health Watch, Inc.; incorporated in Florida.
Dear Joe:







This letter serves to confirm our agreement regarding the reassignment of your duties with Colfax Corporation (the "Company"). The Company has requested and you have agreed to be reassigned as Senior Vice President, Strategic Marketing and Business Development reporting to me and with the duties we have discussed for a term of up to nine months (the "Reassignment"). Your principal place of business shall remain in Richmond, VA.







The Reassignment constitutes "Good Reason" pursuant to Section 10.6 of your Executive Employment Agreement between you and the Company dated April 22, 2008 (the "Employment Agreement"). You have informed the Company that you have agreed to the Reassignment and do not desire to resign from the Company as provided in the Employment Agreement.







Notwithstanding (i) anything to the contrary set forth in the Employment Agreement and (ii) your agreement to the Reassignment, the Company hereby agrees that you shall have Good Reason to effect a Good Reason termination in accordance with Section 1.1 (d) of the Executive Agreement upon completion of the term of the Reassignment. .







This Letter is governed by and is to be construed, administered, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, without regard to conflicts of law principles.







Sincerely,







/s/ William Roller


Executive Vice President







William Roller







I hereby agree and acknowledge the terms of this Letter.







/s/ Joe Niemann


Joe Niemann


Date: 12-17-2010
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 15, 2016

No. 04-16-00703-CR and 04-16-00704-CR

Fanny M. STUART,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 399th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CR3449 and 2016CR5416

Honorable Ray Olivarri, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

In the interest of the efficient administration of the court’ docket, we ORDER Appeal 

Nos. 04-16-00703-CR and 04-16-00704-CR, styled Fanny M. Stuart v. The State of Texas,

consolidated. The parties must file motions, briefs, and other pleadings as if the appeals were 

one but put both appeal numbers in the style of the case. However, a record must be filed in each 

appeal, the record in each case will remain separate and, if supplementation of the record 

becomes necessary, the supplemental material must be filed in the appeal to which it applies. 

The cases must be argued together in one brief, as in a single appeal, and if oral argument is 

requested and granted, the entire case must be argued as a single appeal, with the total time limit 

for each party equal to the ordinary time limit for a party in a single appeal. The court will 

dispose of both appeals in the same judgment, opinion, and mandate.

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 15th day of November, 2016.
___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Trinity Biotech plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin Tansley, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ KEVIN TANSLEY*     
|Kevin Tansley          
|Chief Financial Officer

April 9, 2014



|* | The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2016

No. 04-16-00662-CV

Melissa FUENTES, Individually, and as Next Friend of Victor Robert Fuentes and Isabella 

Elaine Fuentes, Minor Plaintiffs,

Appellant

v.

TEXAS MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.,

Appellee

From the 112th Judicial District Court, Sutton County, Texas

Trial Court No. 5910

Honorable Pedro Gomez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court signed a final order on May 18, 2016. Appellants timely filed a motion for 

new trial on June 7, 2016. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 306a, 329b(a); Williams v. Flores, 88 S.W.3d 631, 

632 (Tex. 2002). 

Appellants’ notice of appeal was due on August 16, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a); 

Lane Bank Equip. Co. v. Smith S. Equip., Inc., 10 S.W.3d 308, 310 (Tex. 2000). A motion for 

extension of time to file a notice of appeal was due on August 31, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P.

26.3; Hone v. Hanafin, 104 S.W.3d 884, 886 (Tex. 2003) (per curiam). See generally Verburgt 

v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (“[A] motion for extension of time is necessarily 

implied when an appellant acting in good faith files a [notice of appeal] beyond the time allowed 

by Rule [26.1], but within the fifteen-day period in which the appellant would be entitled to 

move to extend the filing deadline under Rule [26.3].” (emphasis added)). 

Appellants filed an amended motion for new trial on August 11, 2016. See Moritz v. 

Preiss, 121 S.W.3d 715, 720 (Tex. 2003) (“[A]n amended motion for new trial filed more than 

thirty days after the trial court signs a final judgment is untimely.”). 

Appellants’ notice of appeal was filed on October 10, 2016. 

We ORDER Appellants to SHOW CAUSE in writing within TEN DAYS of the date of 

this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See TEX. R. APP. P.
42.3(a); Verburgt, 959 S.W.2d at 617 (“[O]nce the period for granting a motion for extension of 

time under Rule [26.3] has passed, a party can no longer invoke the appellate court’s 

jurisdiction.”). If Appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be 

dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c).

All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending further order of this court.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
~ -- .... • ---~~8702 

• 

LICEl1SE 

• •, ll I ., 

• I •I • I' 

I •.1. ·• ,j I 

This agreement made this twentieth day of March , 1943 -------- between Boria Caesar ililhelm Ha.gelin '>f Greenwich, in the ccnmty of Fairfield 

in the state .,f Cmmecticut, a subject of the King of Sweden, part of the 

first part, and the United States if America, party .,f the aec'>nd part, 

WI TNESSETH: 

That, WHEREAS, an applicati?n for United States letters patent for a 

Teletype Ciphering device Serial No. 286,286 filed bf B1ris Caesar 111.lhelm 

Bagelin, and 

llHEREAS tbe said Boris Caesar Wilhelm Hagelin ia the :nmer of the entire 

right and title to said application, and 

WHEREAS the said application baa been held secret under an order -,f 

secrecy dated February 22,1943, and 

WHEREA.S the United States is desirous of obtaining certain legal rights I 

thereunder; 

. Now, THEREF~E, in consideration "tf the surrounding circumstances the 

parties have agreed as followa1 

The said Boria Caesar Wilhelm Ha.gelin hereby g:tants a r~yalty-free n.,nexclusive license to tht party :>f the aec.,nd part t., manufacture, uae and sell 

the macliine discbsed in the said applicati iri f.,r United States pa.tent. 

~his lieanseeshall be in effect during h~stilities with &DJ country with 

which the United States is n-,w at war and fJr six m:nths thereafter, but it 

shall cover the completion of all contractauenouted before the tennination of 

hostilities. 

The said Boris Caesar Wilhelm Bagelin hereby waives a.ey claim which he 

'/DB.y have arising from the holding of the said ttPPlication secret in the United 

States Patent Office. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
• REF ID:A58702 • 

In w1 tness whereof the parties above named have hereunto set their 

hands and seals. 

Signed this __ twa_n_t_ie_th ___ day ot __ Ma_r....,ch...__ __ , 1943 

(Seal) /a/ B'1ria Caettar Wilhelm ~elin !Oris Caesar Wiih8tm gel1n 

Subsoribed and sw rn t'1 before me this 20 day 'Jf -------- Ka.rah , 1943 ----------

(Seal) 

No aey PUblio 

(Seal) /s/ Lt. Col. Willard B. Jlillard, Jr. 

Contraotlng otl'ioer 

COPY
NO. 07-06-0126-CV

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	OCTOBER 10, 2006

	______________________________

	IN THE INTEREST OF E.M.M.

	_________________________________

	FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

	NO. 2005-529,976; HON. RUSTY LADD, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	Memorandum Opinion

	_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., CAMPBELL, J., and BOYD, S.J.1

	Ramon Montelongo, Jr., appeals pro se from an order appointing Adelina Perez as sole managing conservator of E.M.M.; Montelongo was appointed possessory conservator.2  In his brief, appellant asserts that 1) he was unaware that custody of the child and the visitation rights of his parents would be determined in the same proceeding, 2) he lacked opportunity to obtain counsel for the trial, 3) he lacked notice of the hearing and opportunity to prepare for it, and 4) the final order contained provisions not discussed at the trial.  We affirm the order.

	First, we note that appellant appeared at the trial of this matter, as did the attorney he hired to represent him against pending criminal charges.  The latter attorney informed the trial court that his client, Montelongo, “through me appearing pro bono in this matter, wants to raise” an issue.  The issue, however, did not involve any complaint raised at bar.  Nor did he complain to the trial court about lacking counsel to advise him or of insufficient prior notice of the hearing.  Similarly absent is any objection to the trial court’s consideration of both custody of the child and visitation by third parties in the same proceeding.  Therefore, any error that may have arisen was waived.  Lemons v. EMW Mfg. Co., 747 S.W.2d 372, 373 (Tex. 1988) (stating that the failure to object or request a continuance waives error when the trial court proceeds to consider matters a party did not believe would be considered at a particular hearing).

	  As to matters purportedly being included in the final order that went unmentioned at trial, appellant does not tell us of what those matters consist.  Nor does he explain how the circumstance purportedly harmed him.  This is of concern because an appellant must include in his brief clear and concise argument for the contentions made with appropriate citations to authorities and to the record.  Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(h).  Moreover, the failure to adequately brief an issue results in its waiver.  Sunnyside Feedyard, L.C. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 106 S.W.3d 169, 173 (Tex. App.–Amarillo 2003, no pet.).  So, due to inadequate briefing, Montelongo waived his complaint about the supposed deviation between what was said at the hearing and the substance of the final order.3

	Accordingly, we overrule his points of error and affirm the judgment.

							Brian Quinn 

						          Chief Justice
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-967

_____________________________

HERBERT ALEXANDER WEGER,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Thomas V. Dannheisser, Judge.

May 8, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Herbert Alexander Weger, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
99-1032.

#### State v. Gomez.

Lucas App. No. L-98-1430. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.

Resnick, J., not participating.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934**

I, J. James Gaynor, the principal executive officer of LightPath Technologies, Inc. certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Light Path Technologies, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

Date: October 1, 2007