alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,408
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,134
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (40)
<INVENTORY>                                     13,831
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                24,647
<PP&E>                                          16,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (10,644)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  31,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,336
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,257
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    31,745
<SALES>                                        120,555
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               120,555
<CGS>                                           76,119
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   76,119
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,853
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,759
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,409
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,530
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .86
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .86
        


</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2199 

To require agencies to conform to concurrent resolutions when promulgating 

rules. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2015 

Mr. ENZI (for himself, Ms. AYOTTE, Mr. CRAPO, and Mr. DAINES) introduced 

the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require agencies to conform to concurrent resolutions 

when promulgating rules. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Regulatory Authority 

5 Clarification Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONCURRENT RESOLUTIONS AND RULEMAKING. 

7 Section 553 of title 5, United States Code, is amend8 ed by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(f) If Congress adopts a concurrent resolution that 

10 clarifies the meaning of a provision of law, including a 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2199 IS

1 clarification as to whether a provision of law delegates cer2 tain authority to an agency, an agency— 

3 ‘‘(1) may not promulgate a rule under this sec4 tion that conflicts with or otherwise does not carry 

5 out the meaning of the provision, as provided in the 

6 concurrent resolution; and 

7 ‘‘(2) shall promulgate new rules that carry out 

8 the meaning of the provision, as provided in the con9 current resolution, if the agency has a rule in effect 

10 that conflicts with or otherwise does not carry out 

11 such meaning.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# FILED
June 10, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT KNOXVILLE DECEMBER SESSION, 1996

STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) No. 03C01-9602-CC-00066 Appellee ) ) McMINN COUNTY vs. ) ) Hon. R. STEVEN BEBB, Judge GUSSIE WILLIS VANN, ) ) (Fel ony Mu rder - Dea th Pe nalt y; Appellant ) Incest)

SEPARATE CONCURRING
I concur in the result r

eached by the majority i n affirming all convicti ons and the appellant's sentence of death. I write separately only to address the issue of whether the indictment for incest is fatally defective for failing to incl ude the requisite mens rea . I agree that the indictment is valid, but for reaso ns other than those articulated by the majority. The majority relies upon State v. Marshall , 870 S.W.2d 532, 537 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1993). In Marshall , this court held that the mens rea

is an essential element of an offense and, therefore, must be included in the indictment. Id . at 537. This court further hel d that, if the mens rea is implicit in the allegations contained in the indictment, the indictmen t is adequate. Id . at 538. The majority appli es this rationale, conclu ding that the mental state of "knowingly " is "necessarily i mplied by the allegatio ns in the indictment."
However, as noted by

the majority, the leg islature did not include the requisite mental state i n the definition of the offense of incest, permitting the application of any one of three mental states set forth in Tenn. Code Ann. § 39- 11-301(c). I would s imply adhere to this cour t's position in State v. Dison , No. 03C01-9602-CC-00051 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Knoxville, Jan. 31, 1997), in which we held that, under these circumstances, the accused's culpable m ental state is2

not an essential element of the offense and need not be alleged in the indictment.

____________________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Jud ge
• REF ID:A67121 

WiiiiB ~£tl.:2m 

• ••1111 

HBHOBANDlJM FOR THE CHAIRM&N, USCIB M~W SUBJJETt US/UK Conf'ere:nee on French and Allied CC»SIC 

.la a result of discussions during two meetings, the US Delegation to 

the forthcoming US/uK Conference on French and Allied Comnm.nication 

Securi:liJ' recmnmenis that:-

... 1. The Conference be held as scheduled • 

2. Heither USCIB nor NSC adopt prior to the Conference a 

fixed position with regard to the steps to be taken to impl'O'Ve 

French and other HI.TO members CCHBC. ~ OA-~,J...._~ 

u~ l>bs~ ~ 1 > .o 4 • -~ 3. IJSCD ._ .. ft the Ad c Caaml.ttee ReportJas,.• pm t•llr- • 

.Qa&ie. t• discussion with the Ult Delegation, sanitise the Report, 

and hand it torthld.th to the Senior British Liaison Officer 

(Brig. Til 'bllan) • 

4. USCIB inform ISIB .torthwi th that the USCIB wishes to 

extend the Agenda to inc1ude a review of' all the conclusions 

r-.ched at the 19Sl BRUS& Conference on this same subject, and 

tl'Bt the present UK paper (Dae/34111), together v.Lth the US paper 

(Ad Hoc Committee Report as smu.ti•ed) will be used as bases for 

discussion at the Conterence. 

WILLIAM F. FRIEllU 

Chairman 

US Delegation 

NSA on 05-21-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

,
' ' ' ,. 

; 

' j• 

REF ID:A521401 

4§8IQIMll! · 

IBDJ.&8 I, 111.llala r. friedman, ot •ah1ngtoa, DS.~ot ot . 

Colabl.a,:wbon addre11 is Oare Ott1ce of the Chief 8l~·Ott1oer, 

11\181Uou l\llldlq, Wasb1qton, D. o., have invented a certala 111-

Pl"Oftll•' 1a omtographio 911ta, tor which I haYe ade aa. applie&-

\loo tor Letter• Patent of the United states, Serial lo. 681.096, 

tiled Juq 15, 1933J and 

IHIRl&S, the invention waa made while X n1 an emplofee ot 

tbe ~ Depanaent, ud periain1 to a de'rioe uaef'ul 1n tile •tlolaal 

w ... , ud 

IBIBIAB, the Oonrament ot the United States 1• dolirou ot 

•ecpd.rila the eatire rJ.abt,·tttle end interaat 1a and to .the.said ., 

11mmtloa and ill ud to uq patent• that mq lane thereoa1 

JIJl1 TBDEl'OU, 1n conaidel"ation of the p:remi.88$1;.~1.cl:oae 

(tl.OO) dollar, the reaeipt f4 whlch ia·~erebt aoknowlecfPd, 11 

' ~ . .. ,. 

11Ulaa J, lriedman, have sold, aelliped, and traneterred, ad. bf 

theee preaent• do hereby ..U, aaeip and tranater uto the Oovemaent. 

ot the thalted Siatea of .&ur1ca, as r9JJ1'e1ented bf the aeore~ ot 

w., th• •tf.r• ri.pt, title and lat.re1t, tbroqh9Ut the' united stat•• 

ot .Aiied~, and the t6JT1tor1ea an4 dependenoiea thereot, -~ not alee- .. 'i· 

when, lD -4 to the aaid 1.R¥'efttioa relaU., to lmprovauat 1a 017P~ ; . . :; . . 

~a _,ne., aa cteecribed, claimed ud Ulustratecl 1ll _:the ·d-oreiald 

appUoaUoil, Serial lo. 6821096, ud aU Letter• Patent. iaeued thereon . . ., 

.'·r 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 12-16-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ . 

. . : . . 

:· .. ·. · .. 

-(~ .... -·-

'·. 

,, 

~ 

i 

i 

j 

i 

·1 

·.1 :-.; 

'. ,) 

. ·.= r 

.I· 

.J 

', 

.. ~ " ·'}·· 

. ;~ . 

.. " 

.:f 

·.:· 

. ,. 

J 

:, 

•· 

: . ···'.~j . 

~\. 

,, 

.:·, 

·.- . J·.· . 

. ? • 

·, 

i 

' ] '. ~-
' I 

---- ------------:--------------------

REF ID:A521401 

thereofa reserving to 1117selt' and legal representat1vea an irrevocable 

and assignable license, without payment of royalty, said license to be 

exoluaive1 except ae to msnufa.cture, use and/or sale b;y or for the 

United States Go•errnent, to make, use and/or sell and to 11oense 

others to make uae and/or eell the aubjoot matter or said 1nventioa 

relatinl to improvement in OJ"1ptographic qatem, to the tull end ot 

the term· or terms tor which Letters Patent or any divisions, reissues, 

renewals, extensions or continuations thereof are or 111a1 be grantedf 

the said entire right, title and interest to be held bJ the Oovernsent 

ot the United St.ates of America, as represented by the Secretary of War 

ud his stioceasors in office, to the full end of the term or terms tor 

which N1d Letters Patent and an;y divisions, reiasuea, renewals or extena1ona thereof are or u.y be granted, l!l8 full:y and entire]J" as the 

au wonld havo been held b,y me had this assignment and sale not been 

made. 

Sworn to and subscribed by' the aaid 11111&.m r. J'riedman 

before me this da, or September, 1936. 

llot&:cy Publlo 

. !
**EXHIBIT 21**

|**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT**                 
|---------------------------------------------------
|Parent                                             
|                                                   
|The Bryan-College StationFinancial Holding Company 
|                                                   
|                                                   
|The Bryan-College Station
Financial Holding Company
|                                                   
|                                                   
|First Federal Savings Bank,
Bryan, Texas
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dotronix, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Russell W. Mitchell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)         The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   February 13, 2007

/s/ Russell W. MitchellRussell W. MitchellChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer


---
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 22-40792 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Liborio De Jesus Gomez-Gomez, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:21-CR-2238-1

______________________________ Before Stewart, Duncan, and Wilson, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Liborio De Jesus Gomez-Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez-Gomez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 25, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40792 Document: 00516763699 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/25/2023No. 22-40792

2 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issu e for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilitie s herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 22-40792 Document: 00516763699 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/25/2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,653,700<F1>
<SECURITIES>                                 1,599,300<F2>
<RECEIVABLES>                                9,797,400<F3>
<ALLOWANCES>                                    88,400
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                         326,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 144,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,454,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                        444,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,641,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     794,000<F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,454,700
<SALES>                                        550,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,755,400
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  697,100
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               554,300<F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               128,700
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             341,300
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (16,400)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             50,400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (2,500)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    47,900
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Includes $849,700 of cash held in segregated accounts for investors and
$270,600 of cash held in restricted accounts.
<F2>Includes $694,300 of actively managed fixed maturity securities and $905,000
of interest-only securities.
<F3>Includes $4,730,500 of finance receivables - securitized.
<F4>Includes retained earnings of $812,800 and accumulated other comprehensive
losses of $18,800.
<F5>Represents an impairment charge to writedown the carrying value of
interest-only securities and servicing rights.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                 CONSENT OF BANCBOSTON ROBERTSON STEPHENS INC.

   We hereby consent to the inclusion of and reference to our opinion dated May
10, 1999 to the Board of Directors of CMC Industries, Inc. ("CMC") in the
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (the "Registration Statement") of ACT
Manufacturing, Inc. ("ACT"), covering common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
of ACT to be issued in connection with the proposed business combination
involving ACT and CMC. In giving the foregoing consent, we do not admit that we
come within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or the rules
and regulations promulgated thereunder, nor do we admit that we are experts
with respect to any part of the Registration Statement within the meaning of
the term "experts" as used in the Securities Act or the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder.

/s/ BancBoston Robertson Stephens Inc.

BancBoston Robertson Stephens Inc.
San Francisco, California
June 23, 1999
IN REPLY RBFBRTO • 

REF ID:A39550 

• 

OCSig0-070 WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER )(q 29, 1936. 

WASHINGITON 

llEMOR.AHDUM FClta .JIJ"e VI• r. Friedman, 'l'HROUGH 

O·I•C•• War Plans and Training Division. 

l. Her~th, for your information and guidance, copy of 

approved Minutes of KeetirJg No. 3 ot the patent Board, Office 

ot the chief Signal Officer. All papers fef'erred to in the 

Minuf;es are inclosed herewith. 

Incle. 

Walter C· Ellis, 

Major, Signal Corps. 

lat Memo Ind.. 8 

'far Plana and '!raining D1Tia1on, OCSigO, llq 29. 1936. '!01 Mr. 

11. ~. :rri•llm· ~ !.t'') it° ..4.- :....:.:.t.:, ~ ,2. £... 

J'er compliance w1 th Paragr - 5 b 1 enclosed Kid.tea 

of Meeting Ro. 3 of the 1'atent :Board. 

W.0.~ •. s. Rumbaugh, 

l(aJ-or~ Signal Carpa. 

. hcla. n./c 

.. 

pproved for Release by NSA on 09-30-2013 pursuant to E.O. 

13526
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GILBERT LERMA, Jr., DBA Stylistics

Car Club, an individual, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

STYLISTICS LOS ANGELES CAR

CLUB, INC., a California corporation;

JORGE LUIS RAMIREZ, an individual, 

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 15-55270

D.C. No. 

2:12-cv-06704-DDP-JEM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Dean D. Pregerson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 8, 2016** 

Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and BELL,*** District Judge.

 

FILED

NOV 17 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

*** The Honorable Robert Holmes Bell, United States District Judge for

the Western District of Michigan, sitting by designation.
Jorge Luis Ramirez and his company, Stylistics Los Angeles Car Club, Inc.,

appeal the district court’s default judgment canceling their federal trademark

registration. Appellants’ primary contention is that the district court had

jurisdiction to only review the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

(TTAB) and not independently rule on trademark infringement claims. But

although the TTAB’s findings may indeed be challenged in district court, see 15

U.S.C. § 1071(b), nothing prevents a court from adjudicating an infringement

action under the general provisions of the Lanham Act, see 5 U.S.C § 1119. The

only effect the TTAB’s decision may have on district court proceedings is through

the doctrine of issue preclusion, see B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc.,

135 S. Ct. 1293, 1299, 1310 (2015), which is non-jurisdictional.

Appellants next argue that the district court erred in directing the U.S. Patent

and Trademark Office to revoke their trademark registration because such relief

was not requested in the complaint, as required under Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 54(c). But the complaint did request both an injunction against

Appellants’ use of the mark and an order declaring that Appellee is the mark’s

rightful owner. That relief does not “differ in kind,” Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(c), from a

request to revoke the trademark registration.

AFFIRMED.

2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CONSENT OF DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.

   We hereby consent to (i) the inclusion of our opinion letter, dated May 10,
1999, to the Board of Directors of ACT Manufacturing, Inc. as Annex B to the
Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus forming part of this Registration Statement on
Form S-4, and (ii) references made to our firm and such opinion in such Joint
Proxy Statement/Prospectus under the captions entitled "SUMMARY--Opinions of
Financial Advisors", "THE MERGER--Background of the Merger", "THE MERGER--ACT's
Reasons for the Merger" and "THE MERGER--Opinion of Deutsch Banc Alex. Brown,
Financial Advisor to ACT". In giving such consent, we do not admit that we come
within the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated
thereunder, and we do not admit that we are experts with respect to any part of
the Registration Statement within the meaning of the term "expert" as used in
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission promulgated thereunder.

                                          DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.

                                          By: /s/ Paul D. Mellin

                                               -----------------------

                                          Name: Paul D. Mellin

                                               -----------------------

                                          Title: Managing Director

                                               -----------------------

June 21, 1999