alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
·- ~~~F ID:A67515 

• 

pproved for Release by NSA on 02-05-2014 pursuant to 

.0. 13526 

---
REF ID:A675' ' 

_L-.J 

-- - ----------- . ·-- - , , _.----- _______ _..;.,.:_ ~ .. 

-- _ ..... 

- - -- - ;. - 1 '" -- ,,. ... 1· I \ -__ }..: __ - l-:-__ ~-~ -

--~--U-H-Al: 

LL ..• J_ --~--~-

-~~ o-

-------- -~ -· ~~-~,~~~ _- ----

,- - - -

- _ .. ---·-- --- -

> 

---

--------

-------------------

,,,. ... 

'--) 

) 

------ ----------· 

--------------------------

-----------------·--------------------- -----
\ • 

@ 

, 

, 

.. - [I) 

(v_~ 

.. 

l 

I 

• 

REF 

tt 

.. ,,/ 

J. • - • 

ID:A67~ 

, 

---.. 

/ 

~~ 

--- #..t 

'II .. •- ._-

------------------------i~------- 1{) .~ ,;::::;-- ------------- --~ ---- ---------~ '\ - - J ~ -'==tr"'"4- Id'~ ~ --- ---- --

·------------------

----------- ---- ------ - -- --- ,_ .. -- ----
, .. 

-

REF ID:A104695 

.· • •• t•,• •.:.I • • 

SIGNAL CORPS GENERAL DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY 

FORT MONMOUTH. NEW .JERSEY 

PATENT MEMORANDUM NO. 3 

{Date) 

MEMORANDUM FOR: 

You are hereby assigned to develop improvem~nt in arts.of value to the C~ief Signal Officer. It is expected that this· work may result in the discovery 

of patentable features, and your assignment to this wo~k is for the particular 

purpose of vesting in the United States all right, title and interest to any 

invention that you may ~ke while engaged in the work assigned, if in the opinion 

of the Chief Signal Officer the public interest demands that the invention be 

owned and cont~olled by the War Department. 

Acceptance of ass.ignment to "this work will constitute an agreement on your 

part to execute the papers required for complete assignment of any such invention 

to·the United States in case the Chief Signal Officer decides that the invention 

should remain secret, or to execute the papers necessary for making application fo~ patent and the assignment of the patent to the United States if secrecy is 

-, 

not necessary or is necessary only for a limited time. In the c~se of an invention 

which the Chief Signal Officer decides should remain secret acceptance of this assignm.en t also constitutes an agreement on your part that you wilx not disclose the 

invention to unauthorized persons until such time as you are informed 0in writing 

by the Directqr of the Signal Corps Laboratories, that the need for secrecy has 

ceased. 

11· 

The assignment of the invention to the United States must be drafted in 

form to comply with requir~ments uf law relating to patent applications coming 

under this category; but such assignment or instrμment of transfer may in a 

proper case include suitable reservations to enable you to retain or repossess 

your commercia~ rights, in whole or in part, if and when the need for secrecy 

ceases to exist. · 

This notice of assignment to develop improvements in arts of value to the 

Signal Corps shall not be construed as divesting you of ownership of any invention ma.de by you while engaged on this work, other than those which in the 

opinion of the Chief Signal Officer should be owned and controlled by the War 

Department to safeguard the public interest, except that the United States shall 

be entitled to a nonexclusive license to any and all inventions ma.de by you in 

the course of the work assigned in the same way as if this special assignment had 

not been made. 

By order of the Director: 

1st Ind • . Sig.C.Laboratories, Ft.Monmouth,N .J. __________ To: Director, Sig.C.Labs. 

(Date) 

1. I. hereby accept assignment to work under the .conditions set forth ~ .... basic communication. 

Execute in duplicate. One CQPY to CSigO, one copy retained at Sig.C.L~bs. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-18-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Full Satisfaction of Mortgage



 Exhibit 10.1(e) 

FULL SATISFACTION OF MORTGAGE 
 Know all men, that the undersigned hereby certifies that a certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Leases, Fixture Filing, Timber Filing and Financing Statement executed by Potlatch
Forest Holdings, Inc., a Delaware limited liability company, and recorded on December 8, 2008, as Instrument No. 464537 in the records of the Clerk of the District Court of Idaho County, Idaho, is fully satisfied and discharged.

 The lien of the undersigned is hereby released. 
 Dated as of: June 28, 2011 
  

			
	 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., in its capacity as
 Collateral Agent

		
	By:	 	     /s/   Anthea Del
Bianco




			
	Name:	 	Anthea Del Bianco
	Title:	 	Vice President









 State of California 
 County of San Francisco 
 On this 28th day of June, in the year 2011, before me, a
Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared Anthea Del Bianco, known or identified to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed same. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written.

  

			
	     /s/   Liliana Claar

	            Liliana Claar, Notary
Public




			
	Notary Public for the State of	 	
California




			
	Residing at:	 	
 




			
	Commission Expires:	 	     February 1, 2012



 /s/   Notary Seal 

  
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         155,908
<SECURITIES>                                 7,511,619
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,864,199
<PP&E>                                       1,869,974
<DEPRECIATION>                                 363,355
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               9,529,771
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          835,877
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        72,350
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,580,728
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 9,529,771
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,901,818
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             181,638
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,635,134)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,635,134)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,635,134)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.78)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.78)


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

***CONSENTOF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM***

*** ***

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-105414and No. 333-111270) and Form S-8 (No. 333-22217, No. 333-41754,No. 333-53380, No. 333-75060, No. 333-111275, No. 333-121375, No. 333-139064and No. 148548) of Overland Storage, Inc. of our report dated October 13,2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements, which appears in this Form 10–K.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

San Diego, California

October 13, 2008

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Statement and Consolidated Statement of Operations of
Signature Inns, Inc. as of and for the three month period ended September 30,
1995, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                       2,448,523
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  565,309
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,013,832
<PP&E>                                       9,836,949
<DEPRECIATION>                               3,435,171
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,690,504
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,244,477
<BONDS>                                      8,796,688
<COMMON>                                     4,432,676
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,690,504
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,952,610
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,044,157
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               129,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             234,973
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                901,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            901,556
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   901,556
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No., 2232-610]

                    On August 11, 2009, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy), filed a petition asking the Commission to declare that the state of South Carolina has waived its water quality certification for the relicensing of Duke Energy's Catawba-Wateree Hydroelectric Project No. 2232. On April 17, 2014, the Commission denied the petition.[1]                                          On May 16, 2014, Duke Energy filed a request for rehearing. By delegated order issued June 16, 2014, rehearing was granted for the limited purpose of further consideration.                

On August 5, 2014, based on an agreement among Duke Energy, two environmental stakeholders, and South Carolina's water quality agency, Duke Energy filed a motion to stay deliberation on the rehearing request. On February 18, 2015, having received a final water quality certification from the state, Duke Energy filed a notice of withdrawal of its rehearing request.

                    Pursuant to Rule 216 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,[2]                                          the withdrawal of any pleading is effective at the end of 15 days from the date the notice of withdrawal is filed if, within that period, no motion in opposition to the notice is filed and the Commission takes no action disallowing withdrawal. The 15-day period closed on March 5, 2015. No such pleading was filed, and the Commission took no such action. Accordingly, Duke Energy's rehearing request is withdrawn and this proceeding is thereby terminated.                

Dated: March 6, 2015.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC,*                         147 FERC ¶ 61,037.                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 385.216 (2014).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-05871 Filed 3-13-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-50514

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ELIGIO OJEDA-GONZALEZ, also known as Miguel Reynosos-Gonzalez, also

known as Javier Dominguez-Arias

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:06-CR-1438-ALL

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgmentin a Criminal Case, Eligio Ojeda-Gonzalez raises

arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and

not a separate criminal offense. See United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d

624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed (Aug. 28, 2007) (No. 07-6202). The

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

November 8, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-50514

2

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment

of the district court is AFFIRMED.
~. 

..... 

1.· . .• 

ectassified · 

-'· 

, . 

.. -.. :-. 

"· . ' 

·' 

.. 

... ··: : . .... .. • : ·• ~:.= . 

:···· . 

. ·. :~:: ; .. 

. ~-~:-.. -~ 

.... 

.. ., 

' : .. :-. -·~·· 

..... 

·. 

.. 

. ...... ·. ·' ..·. '· .. 

-_ -_~<:;~~~~,)~~,.-\-:~~r~i~~":~~~~~:~,i;~~,,i~~:::_·:·•.:.:.•.~.-:_._-_h_~.".•.:.:_~.·-.·~v·-::··;' ::_~_ :· i ;,<>:.. .. ..• ·\. ' . .. . ... . •. ;, .. ~=. ~· . 

.. ·~t 

. .. • , • 1' ••• : 

·.' 

~: .. ~ ·.\. 

\ . 

~ 

f

. · ..~-·, ',. ·' . 

' 

t . 

... : 

'····· 

" . • £' 

. ':.·· 

. '·' 

,;.,, . ·~ . 

: .. ·= ·. ~ . 

' . I•
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

STACY ALLEN TAYLOR,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Respondent-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-5110

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00393-EDK, Judge Elaine Kaplan.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R 

Stacy Allen Taylor, an incarcerated pro se litigant, 

challenges the dismissal of his complaint as frivolous

under 19 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) by the United States 

Court of Federal Claims. Because we agree that the 

complaint was frivolous, we grant the government’s 

motion to summarily affirm. 

Case: 14-5110 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 08/05/2014
2 TAYLOR v. US

Taylor’s complaint alleges that he entered into an 

agreement with the Central Intelligence Agency to assist 

its agents in collecting various information and assets in 

exchange for witness protection and full immunity. His 

complaint requests that the court direct the government 

to turn over evidence showing corruption and wrongdoing 

by the CIA and honor the agreement’s obligations to pay 

Taylor a recurring monthly salary. After granting Taylor 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the United States 

Court of Federal Claims screened the suit and dismissed 

the complaint. 

A district court is required to dismiss a frivolous

complaint from a litigant who is proceeding in forma 

pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Frivolous complaints

include those in which the factual allegations asserted are 

so unbelievable that there is no need for an evidentiary 

hearing to determine their veracity. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989) (frivolous claims include 

those that describe “fantastic or delusional scenarios”);

Gladney v. Pendleton Correctional Facility, 302 F.3d 773, 

774 (7th Cir. 2002); cf. Galloway Farms, Inc. v. United 

States, 834 F.2d 998, 1000 (Fed. Cir. 1987) (A frivolous 

claim is one “whose disposition is obvious.”). 

That description fits this case. Taylor’s complaint 

alleges a tale of international intrigue involving the Irish 

Republican Army, the CIA’s sale of decommissioned 

Russian nuclear warheads to Iran and North Korea, and 

CIA agents exchanging long-range missiles for American 

and French prisoners. Because the Court of Federal 

Claims correctly determined that Taylor’s complaint was 

frivolous, we grant the motion to summarily affirm. See

Joshua v. United States, 17 F.3d 378, 380 (Fed. Cir. 1994) 

(Summary affirmance “is appropriate, inter alia, when the 

position of one party is so clearly correct as a matter of 

law that no substantial question regarding the outcome of 

the appeal exists.”).

Case: 14-5110 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 08/05/2014
 TAYLOR v. US 3

 

Accordingly, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion for summary affirmance is granted. 

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

s19

Case: 14-5110 Document: 13 Page: 3 Filed: 08/05/2014
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-0360

_____________________________

KENNETH E. HAMMETT,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Columbia County.

Wesley R. Douglas, Judge.

May 23, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

OSTERHAUS, WINOKUR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Kenneth E. Hammett, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

To the Board of Directors
CPI Aerostructures, Inc.


We hereby consent to incorporation  by reference in the Registration  Statements
(Nos.  333-11669 and 333-42403) on Form S-8 and  Registration  Statements  (Nos.
333-08391 and 333-08216) on Form S-3 of CPI  Aerostructures,  Inc. of our report
dated  February  6,  1998  related  to the  consolidated  balance  sheet  of CPI
Aerostructures,  Inc. and  Subsidiary  as of December 31, 1997,  and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each
of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1997,  which report appears in
the December 31, 1997 annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of CPI Aerostructures, Inc.

Goldstein Golub Kessler LLP
New York, New York

July 29, 1998


                                Page 3 of 3 Pages
O· CHARGE TO 

GOVERNMENT RATE. ' 

l '..,_: .... r WAR DEPARTMENT TELEGRAM. • ,..,i 

OFFICIAL BUSINESS. 

WASHINGTON. 

' .__•' -, I I •·' 

Uajor H. o. ·rnro~ey, 

c/o Mr. F. W. · Ju.lm, 

No. 244 Madison Avenue, · New York, ~. Y •. 

July 30, 1919. 

II 

Fat.yen reqaest;e that we authorize Gherardi, .American Telephone 

and Telegraph Comp•J to cGriij:!ly 'With l'abyan • e requeeJt cQntain-ed 

in l$tte~ Of Jwie 17. lf you sse no obj6Ction, eon&ult Gherardi 

·hem 

\V D., STANDARD 

Fo&:u No. la. 

Churchill 

3-2283 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

1 

I 

1 I . 

I 

I 

I 

l
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2162 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2162

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 8, 2015

           Referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To establish a 10-year term for the service of the Librarian of 
                               Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Librarian of Congress Succession 
Modernization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT AND TERM OF SERVICE OF LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint the Librarian of 
Congress, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
    (b) Term of Service.--The Librarian of Congress shall be appointed 
for a term of 10 years.
    (c) Reappointment.--An individual appointed to the position of 
Librarian of Congress, by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate, may be reappointed to that position in accordance with 
subsections (a) and (b).
    (d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
appointments made on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    The first paragraph under the center heading ``library of 
congress'' under the center heading ``LEGISLATIVE'' of the Act entitled 
``An Act Making appropriations for the legislative, executive, and 
judicial expenses of the Government for the fiscal year ending June 
thirtieth, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, and for other purposes'', 
approved February 19, 1897 (29 Stat. 544, chapter 265; 2 U.S.C. 136), 
is amended by striking ``to be appointed by the President, by and with 
the advice and consent of the Senate,''.

            Passed the Senate October 7, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```