alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 10.7



 Exhibit 10.7 
 AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO CLINICAL TRIAL AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO THE
CLINICAL TRIAL AGREEMENT (the “Amendment”) is effective 14 October 2009 (“Effective Date”) The General Hospital Corporation d/b/a Massachusetts General Hospital, a not-for-profit corporation organized under the laws of
Massachusetts with its principal place of business at 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114 (“Institution”) and CytoDyn, Inc., a publicly traded corporation organized under the laws of Colorado with its principal place of business at 1511
Third Street, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 (“Company”). 
 RECITALS 

 

	 	A.	INSTITUTION has previously entered into a Clinical Trial Agreement to perform the study protocol entitled “An observational study to determine the in-vitro
immunologic and virology activity of Cytolin,” with Company on 28 September 2009 (the “Agreement”). 

  

	 	B.	The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein. 

 AGREEMENT 
 NOW, THEREFORE, INSTITUTION and Company agree as follows: 

 

	 	1.	Except as expressly modified by this First Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. All terms used herein
shall have the same meaning as ascribed to them in the Agreement. To the extent any term or provision of this First Amendment conflicts with any term or provision of the Agreement, the terms and provisions of this First Amendment shall prevail.


  

	 	2.	Section 11.2(a) shall be replaced in its entirety as follows: 

 Company shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain policies of professional and general liability insurance in amounts not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and
Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) annual aggregate covering its obligations under this Agreement, including contractual liability coverage for its subject injury and indemnification obligations under this Section 11, if any. 

 

	 	3.	This Amendment shall be made part of the Agreement and attached thereto. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the last date written below. The Effective Date of this Amendment shall be 14 October 2009. 








			
	ACCEPTED and AGREED:
	
	The General Hospital Corporation
	
	 /s/ Jason McLaren

	 Jason McLaren, J.D., Pharm.D.
 Agreement Associate

		
	Date:	 	10/21/09
	
	CytoDyn, Inc.
	
	 /s/ Allen D. Allen

	Allen D. Allen
	Chief Executive Officer
		
	Date:	 	October 14, 2009
<PAGE>

                SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                     Washington, D.C.  20549



                             FORM 8-K



                          CURRENT REPORT



             Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                 Securities Exchange Act of 1934



         Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
                         January 3, 2000




                      LSB FINANCIAL CORP.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



    Indiana                 0 - 25070                35-1934975
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (State or other       (Commission File No.)       (IRS Employer
 jurisdiction of                                  Identification
 incorporation)                                         No.)



 101 Main Street, Lafayette, Indiana                    47902
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  (Address of principal executive offices)           (Zip Code)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code (765) 742-1064
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                              N/A
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)





<PAGE>

Item 5.  Other Events
---------------------

     Attached as Exhibit 99 is the Registrant's press release dated January
3, 2000 announcing that its subsidiary, Lafayette Savings Bank FSB has
received $1.4 million from Bennett Funding Corp. of Syracuse, NY, pursuant
to a settlement agreement entered into with the trustee in bankruptcy.


Item 7.  Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information
         and Exhibits
-------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c)   Exhibits:

          The  exhibit  referred  to in Item 5 of this  Report and listed on the
     accompanying  Exhibit  Index  is  filed  as  part  of  this  Report  and is
     incorporated herein by reference.

<PAGE>

                            SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant  has duly  caused  this  report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned hereunto duly authorized.


                                   LSB FINANCIAL CORP.



Date: January 3, 2000         By:  /s/Mary Jo David
      -----------------            -----------------------------------
                                   Mary Jo David
                                   Vice President and Chief Financial
                                    Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

<PAGE>



                                 Exhibit Index

Exhibit
Number                 Description
-------                -----------------------------------------------

  99                   Press Release dated January 3, 2000
' ' 

I. 

\ 

' 

REF ID:A62810 

Dr. G. OaIOOw 

Department ar Ph,yaica 

Qeorge Washington Uni:veraity 

Washington, D. c. 

near Dr • Ge.mow t 

e2. April 1955 

To avoid the riak. or your cbara.ct.er1s1ng us aa 

perhaps discourteous 1n delaying eo 1cmg to thank you 

ror 70\U" reprint ot Posaible •tbenatical. l\el&tion Bet~n Dio:i;yr1bonuel.e1c Acid and. Proteins, I "W&nt to 

at.)'" that this 1• being di~tated. .t'rom a boapital bed in 

George Vashil1gton where they tell me I u getting along 

n1ee]¥ :!'rom a coronary occlusion. 

Bad it not been the case that I 'WB.11 in Europe at 

the time, I would h&ve been in the audience to bear 

your recent talk on the cryptology or the protein 

mo.lecule, & title that intrigued me no em.. lfov I 

understand wmt TOU mesnt by the title ot that talk. 

i'h&nking yw on bebal:f' at both Jira. '.rriednan and 

D!)"Belf', 1 ara, 

81ncerel.y, 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
REF ID:A65480 

Cbe.nge to Ba.aie Regulation (ll-3) 

AG 1/N38T (Mr. Friedtm.n) ll M!y 54 

Lt. I. T. McDonald. 

6o493 

In accordanca vith a. recOJ11Dendation ma.de by t~ National Security J\&entr;f 

Scient11'1c Adv-Uary :!oe.rd at it. 20 April 1954 aeeting, it is requeated that 

paragraph 3b of Section IV ot NSA :Regulation 11-3 be cM.nged. to ree.d: 

"Tho Dix'eetor -.y appoint eleetronic,. teleconmunie&tiona, 

ms.thema.tiee a.nd such other panel# te4= 11ub=i!Dela u lfAY be required 

to :tacilita.te studying J)erl1eular problems or intereat to the Beard·" 

WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAlf 

Executive Seex-etary 

1'SA Scientit'ie Adviaory Bee.rd 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
REF ID:A243608B 

Q~ l Can we take '800 to England? 

1. 1'<>. 

Q. 2 Circuit diagram am. description or operation to England? 

A. lo. 

Q .. 3 How long will it. take tor combined purposea to replM• CCV. with BCJ;i""? 

A. About l J&n 1952. 

Q. 4 Assume the British hope to have their new m.ach:tne ready before 

l Jan 195~, and that the)" oBn n0t. adapt. it to the BCY. Is it not 

"5o uneconcnice.1 to adopt the BC!! under euch oircwnatancee einoe it 

will remain in use tor onlJr' a abort time? 

A:t tea it i• too uneconomies.1. 

·.· Q. 5 How secure is BCf.r! Cot!?pared to aClf? 

A. Jfmnerous weaknesses ot the CCM have been overcorie1 

tob•lt'ra 

Bad :rot.or- oft 

Short.er cyole 1engtha. 

th• major Makneea reri..a.ining 11 the basic l'feakne"a or aDT 5 rot.or 

aohine in connection with high speed t.r1al a:nd error met.hooe. 

Q. ' Can.the ttPKX be adapted to work with the BC1l'? 

A. Tea. 7-rotor adaptation, 2 dwnndea. 

Q. 7 ~ uae dunaie•? Suppo•e we make them live rotor a. 

A. !here 1a no aeana at the &eaent. time ot adllpU.ng our l!lllch1nee to 

the 7-rotor design~ 

I : I 2 t i 

. Tf PEX 1 ( ) . CCll : -mi t "' • (:; !> . • i t : : • • 

i 

.~ I I 

~ : 

: I Beil I t 

. t t s • 

t ' ap. I = 

:i i BCJl . . . . I " r " 

I I' 

.. ~. ~ 

Jeclassified and approved • i .. t i : " 

or . 1.\Jl release by NSA on I RB1l .. < l ICCll : ' r .. " -- ·- • 

]9-20-2013 pursuant to E.O. ' I I I r . . .. 

13526 

High ••c. ICJf or C6k~flDENT' IL -1- better •ec •.C J:il • -- ,_ .. ---·· -- -

~: 
14 Nov 1949 

Qt.J'EST!ON'S AB~)Ut!' Tiffi BCM (CSP 3800) WHICH 

THE ERITIGH l!AY ASK, A~m ANS'.lER.S THF.RETO 

CONT'D 

Q. 8 If ncn is tor hi-level, whnt will be used for medium level? 

A. Use DCll with sep&rate rotors. 

Q. 9 What are the physical eecurl ty re·::iuirementa you oentioned in your 

letter? 

A. (l) Regis'OOr, ru:id account for at least quarterly to a. eentr.al office 

or record, all component part$, i.e.: 

machine 

baskets 

rotors 

ke1 lists. 

(2) Hazardous dqty. 

Q. 10 Would the U.S. authorize tho :irianutacture, fol" the British, by the 

U .s. r.ianufacturer, a sufficient number of the U,s. tY'?G of I3CH, 

namely CSP JBOO~ provided tho British pay tho cost? 

A. ? Referred to Din~wSl for decision. 

Q~ ll l'lill U. S ~ give ua jags a."1d dies? 

A. lfo. 

Q. 12 Will U.S. lend us jugs and dies? 

A. No. Impracticable~ 

Q. 13 If 'W& adopt BCV.,, as it now s"t.:'U'lds, what a:re the prospects !or' in:proved 

security on a not too coa~ly basis. 

A. (a) Changeable tires. 

(b) Add 2 effective rotors tc· the maze. 

Q. 14 il'e would likt) the blueprints to .rna.nu:racture in F.nglaro. 

A. tto - because of pe.tenta involved. Would have to have a license from 

Teletype. 

C6P!f!fiENTlA£ 

-2-
## PECHANGA INDIAN RESERVATION

October 21, 2014 Mr. Jared Blumenfeld Regional Administrator Temecula Band oj Luisefio Mission Indians Post Office Box 1477 • Temecula, CA 92593 Telephone (951) 770-6000 Fax (951) 695-1778

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 Tribal Chairman: Mark Macarro Council M embers: Catalina R Chacon Corrina R Garbani Sanchez Marc Luker Andrew Masiel, Sr. Robert "RJ." Munoa Russell "Butch" Murphy Tribal Secretary: Louise Burke Tribal Treasurer: Christina McMenamin

Re: Revised PMz.s Designation Recommendation for the Pechanga Band ofLuiseno Mission Indians Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: The Pechanga Band of Luisefio Mission Indians (Tribe) appreciates the opportunity to submit a revised recommendation for the designation ofthe National AmbientAir Quality Standard for PMz.5. In accordance with the appropriate provisions of the Clean Air Act, the Tribe recommends that the air quality management area within the Pechanga Reservation's exterior boundaries be designated as attainmentjunclassifiable for the annual fine particle PMz.s standards. This recommendation replaces the recommendation made by the Tribe in ourletterto you dated December 17, 2013 . Under the standards enunciated in your letter ofAugust 19,2014, EPA intends to use a designation category of "unclassifiablejattainment" for areas that are monitoring attainment or do not have monitors, and that the EPA has reason to believe are likely attainment and are not contributing to nearbyviolations." By contrast, the EPA intends to classify as "unclassifiable" those areas where the EPA cannot determine based on available information whether the area is meeting the NAAQS or where EPA has not determined that the area contributes to a nearby violation. By these standards, the air quality management area within the Pechanga Reservation would more properly be designated as "unciassifiabIejattainment" and on that basis we submit this revised recommendation. As you know, the Tribe has been monitoring PMz.s since 2008. We now have sufficient certified data to demonstrate a conclusive designation ofattainment. The Tribe would appreciate an opportunity to consultwith EPA on the designations process and we will be in touch with your office by phone to see ifthat is still feasible. Thankyou for your consideration ofthis revised recommendation.

Mark Macarro, Chairman
*Friday, August 6, 1999*

MOTION DOCKET

99-378.

#### Coletta v. Yang.

Montgomery App. No. 17289. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to stay the briefing schedule pending a decision in Supreme Court case No. 98-2445, *Stickney v. State Farm, Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.,*

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to stay the briefing schedule be, and hereby is, granted.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.

Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jovan Slater, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 727]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), rendered May 14, 2001, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, gang assault in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, resolution of issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded to the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]). Santucci, J.P., Florio, Krausman and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

April 4, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00079

- CR

Andrew MIERA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016cr7970

The Honorable Joey Contreras , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK

OF JURISDICTION.

It is so ORDERED on April 4, 2018

.

_____________________________ Irene Rios , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 4th day of April, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>




<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           8,630
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,124
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,919
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     14,496
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          15,017
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            15,020
<LOANS>                                         78,270
<ALLOWANCE>                                        654
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,874
<DEPOSITS>                                     118,935
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                842
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,795
<COMMON>                                             7
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 135,874
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  8,040
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,451
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   879
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                10,370
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,487
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,797
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            5,573
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       72
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 213
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,840
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,102
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,102
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .99
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.71
<LOANS-NON>                                        770
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,948
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  2,718
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   889
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      313
<RECOVERIES>                                         6
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  654
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               654
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            436
        




</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 21.01

                                 Subsidiaries of
                    Occupational Health + Rehabilitation Inc

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Occupational Orthopaedic Center, Inc.,
A Rhode Island corporation

CM Occupational Health, Limited Liability Company,
A Maine limited liability company
(also doing business as The Health Center)

OHR/MMC, Limited Liability Company,
A Maine limited liability company
(also doing business as Occupational Health + Rehabilitation,
An affiliate of Maine Health)

Kent/OH+R, LLC
A Rhode Island limited liability company

OH+R/Boston, LLC,
A Massachusetts limited liability company
(also doing business as Occupational Health + Rehabilitation)

OHR/Baystate,LLC,
A Massachusetts limited liability company
(also doing business as Occupational Health + Rehabilitation)

Occupational Health Connection LLC,
A New York limited liability company
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
JumboSports  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  on Forms  S-8  (File  Nos.  333-45051  and
333-45043) of our report dated April 23, 1999, on our audits of the consolidated
financial statements of JumboSports Inc. and subsidiaries as of January 30, 1998
and January 29, 1999 and for the years ended January 31, 1997,  January 30, 1998
and January 29,  1999,  which  report is included in this annual  report on Form
10-K.

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
Tampa, Florida
April 29, 1999
## FINAL RULE TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT (TSD):

Energy Conservation Standards for Ge neral Service Fluorescent Lamps and

Incandescent Reflector Lamps

July 2009

U.S. Department of Energy

Assistant Secretary

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

Building Technologies Program

Appliances and Commerci al Equipment Standards

Washington, DC 20585This Document was prepared for the Department of Energy

by staff members of

Navigant Consulting, Inc., and the Lighting Research Center
...=-.···· 

REF ID:A487601 

.. ~· 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-08-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

-·~ : ; 
~- '\ • -REF ID :A487601 • 

NAVY DEPAffI'MENT 

OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE 

WASHINGTON 

TO BE HANDLED BY COMMISSIONED OFFICERS ONLY 

Mr. Knox 

Admiral Stark 

Rear Ad~iral Ingersoll 

Hear Admiral Turner 

Lt.Comdr. McCollum 

Inspection 

of these documents 

is 

limited 

to the following 

(Secretary of the Navy) 

(Chief of Naval Operations) 

(Assistant C.N.O.) 

(Director, War Plans Division) 

(Far East Section Head, Op-16-F-2) 

/sf A. D. KRAMER, 

By direction of D.N.I. (Capt.Kirk). 

--------------~---------- - --

·-....,_. 
REF ID:A487601 • 

JD-1: 2513 

2514 

2515 

2516 

2518 

2519 

15 May,1941 

State 

Chief of Staff 

War Plans (Anny) 

Above NAVY file messages were distributed as indicated above, 

in the original .form (not redrafted as a Memorandum) by Col. Bratton 

( G-2) on 14 May, 19 41. 

ADK 

A. D. Kramer 

Pen-and-ink notation: 

Note: Op--.20 ) 

Op 20 G ) 

Op 20 GZ ) 

Op 16 F2 ) 

Op 16 F ) 

Op 16 ) 

17 May 141 

After conf erririg, this practice 

is opposed. F-2 (Mccollum) will 

so inform Col. Bratton. Op 20 (Noyes) 

will contact Signal Corps. ADK 

Op 20 verbal corrJnent: "Especially in view of the recent leak, 

ev-ery step possible should be taken to prevent recurrence. 

SecNav, CNO, etc., feel it would be 'calamitous 1 , if this 

source folded up now. 11 (during midst of U.S.-Jap negotiations, 

and probable entrance of the U.S. into the war. ADK) , possible nDK 

#1 In G2 ~.~emo File 

#3 In r:cRYPTO SECURITY11 File 

Copy 2 of 3
:, .. 

... ~ ... ' . ,, 

~ rz.. 

Cl) 

"> --·-·-·---·-~·~· ••• ···--...,-.·--' ---·· 

-.- -- - ·-y---- ---- ---.-..--

. ... · .. 

-SECREJ: 

COP? 

Ju.q 9, 1942 

li1.DWi~NDW For: Chief of Sta.rt 

l. . Ra!'ereince is made to attached memcrM<1Wlt tor 

General Marshall, dated Jui, 9, 1942. 

2. Intimate interchange of teehnical cryptanalytic 

in!orma.tion between the British and the A~erican Armies 

has been in progress for over a 1esr, and appears to be 

quite satisfactory to both ddes. Stueies and ce>nferenaes pertaining to a similar exchange or technical 

cryptographic ir.1"o:rmat1on to facilitate communication 

among the Juterica.n Army on the one side tllld the P.AJI' and 

the British A.rm7 on the other side in all echelons 

have been in progress tor about three m,otrthlt,, and rill 

be completed V8f7 aoon. Ir interohante tit ·similar 

material appears to be more &dvanoed bet•een th• British 

liavy and the American ~, it ie because actual intu ... 

communication between these two services has been 

necessary for a much longer period of time. 

Atta.checlr 

1-leo. 7-9-42 

George V. Strong, 

kla.jor Qeneral, 

.Assistant Chief of Sta.ff, G-2 

c o r y 

i Qeclassifi ed and a~~roved for release b~ NSA on 09-19-2013 ~ursuant to E. O. 1352a 

&: 

@ SECRET 

' rz.. 

.. 
\ 

·: ,--- -·-:-- · - · ------- · _;__ ; ·. REF ·.ID :-A2 7 2·41 B • 1 •• ... : 

.... · ... -~ - -

COP I 

Tltt WITE HOOSE 

iASHDlGTOff 

. , .. · 

Ju~ 9, 1942 

Some time ago the Prime Minister 

stated that our cipher expert.a of tbe 

United Statea and British Navies were in 

close touch but that ha 11ae under the 

impression tb.&t there RS not a similar 

intimate interchange bet.ween our two 

Armies. l wonder 1!' you· cotilci: tue this 

up with General Dill and let Jae know. 

"' 

COPI 

... ~ 
• 

c 

0 

p 

y 

'Ul!XORAHDUU POR 

REF ID:A27241B 

'DIE WHITE HOUSE 

WASHING'roB 

July 9' 1942 

GmERAL MARSIALL: 

Sane time ago the Prime Minister 

stated that our cipher experts of the 

United States and British Navies were in 

close touch but that he was under the 

impression that there was not a siI:li.lar 

intimate interchange bet119en our two 

Arai.es. I 'WOilder if you could take this 

up with General Dill and let me know. 

F. D. R.