alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                                Washington, DC  20549


                                      FORM 8-K


                                    CURRENT REPORT


                       Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
                          Securities Exchange Act of 1934



                  Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
                                  May 30, 2000




                             CLASSIC BANCSHARES, INC.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
         (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)


            Delaware                   0-27170                61-1289391
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(State or other jurisdiction  (Commission File No.)(IRS Employer  Identification
of incorporation) No.)



       344 17th Street, Ashland, Kentucky                           41101
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  (Address of principal executive offices)                        (Zip Code)




        Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (606) 325-4789
                                                            --------------


                                           N/A
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
<PAGE>


Item 5.     Other Events

     On May 30, 2000, the Registrant issued the press release attached hereto as
Exhibit 99 announcing its earnings for the year ended March 31, 2000.

Item 7.     Financial Statements and Exhibits

     (c)     Exhibits

            99 Press release dated May 30, 2000.



<PAGE>

                                   SIGNATURES


     Pursuant to the  requirements  of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant  has duly  caused  this  Report  to be  signed  on its  behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                      CLASSIC BANCSHARES, INC.




Date: May 31, 2000                     By: /s/Lisah M. Frazier
     -----------------                  -------------------------------
                                        Lisah M. Frazier, Vice President,
                                        Treasurer and Chief Financial
                                        Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contais interim summary financial information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statement of Operations of Royal Casino Group
for the quarter ended October 31, 1996, which statements have been compiled by
management.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1996
<CASH>                                         416,206
<SECURITIES>                                    38,700
<RECEIVABLES>                                   23,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     48,526
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               804,945
<PP&E>                                       2,593,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                  92,497
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,312,580
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          294,506
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,440,000
<COMMON>                                     2,778,102
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,312,580
<SALES>                                        715,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               685,155
<CGS>                                          658,222
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,014,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,158
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,565
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (347,731)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (347,731)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (347,731)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (.078)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.078)
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2057 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2057

 To appropriately limit the size of the population required for urban 
                areas of metropolitan statistical areas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 15, 2021

 Mr. Thune (for himself and Mr. Kelly) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To appropriately limit the size of the population required for urban 
                areas of metropolitan statistical areas.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Metropolitan Statistical Area 
Preservation Act''.

SEC. 2. POPULATION OF URBAN AREAS.

    Section 3504 of title 44, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(l) In implementing subsection (e)(3), the Director--
            ``(1) shall not establish, for purposes of designating 
        areas as metropolitan statistical areas, or any successor 
        thereto, a minimum population for the urban area of such a 
        metropolitan statistical area that is more than 50,000; and
            ``(2) may, only for statistical purposes, and in addition 
        to the minimum population for urban areas described in 
        paragraph (1), establish other statistical area designations 
        with minimum population requirements for urban areas that are 
        higher than the minimum population for an urban area described 
        in paragraph (1).''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.2

               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants

The Board of Directors
Pacific State Bank
Reedsport, Oregon:

     We consent to the use of our report  dated June 27,  1997,  relating to the
financial statements of Pacific State Bank, included herein and to the reference
to our firm under the heading "Experts" in the prospectus.

/s/ KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

Portland, Oregon
   
September 10, 1997
Exhibit 31.3

CERTIFICATIONS

I, William Andrew
Hendricks, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



/s/ William Andrew Hendricks, Jr.William Andrew Hendricks, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer


Date: March 13, 2017
99-1288.

#### State ex rel. Gay v. State Personnel Bd. Review.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus. On July 27, 1999, relator filed an amended complaint for a writ of mandamus. Relator’s amended complaint did not include the certificate of service required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2)(C). Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that relator’s amended complaint be, and hereby is, stricken.
99-496.

#### Donnelly v. Herron.

Cuyahoga App. No. 74324.

Moyer, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, J., dissent.
.. . • REF ID:A272717e 

lt la Hfl\lH'hiei tbat 'the. p&t•ilit a.pplloa'i.ioa flf ¥U.lliaa l'e 

fd.e~. ·Ml Mpl•J•• ol the Si~ Cor.;a,, i.V >Jepart!il8-ut, nla•iaa '° ua. ldpro~t. iA crnt.opapa.t• 8¥•tea .. ~ial wo. aa.oq, 

t11" ~ 11. lNI, • een'i.l1Ud \Uad•f' \he proY.biona ot a..\i• 

41K, hA•i.ttML 8'&.•Ma, ae .. -.... u • ..;.c •• t1'U.o ~:, • .nioa 11. 

Illa .S.tl• 1a ad ta 11lillt.a ill.,....• ba1 h•• uaiple4 to W vat•M 

M.ak•• u1 nprea.-..S 1rJ.y '\iUI S..n1*1')' ot lf'U' by aaaip11111a\. 

--~d. b'J Ri4 frl.._. ader da-.. et 6ep~ 10, lNt, ,. ........ 

a.,.._tal>•r 11, 1811, u.a. aut-t.Gi. 

Ii .M9 'bMa ci•t•r•dAM taat tiM 1t1'N•Uo l • t.,ertaa• 

tt.> t~ ~ a.nd. deteu:n •f the bJ,\e~ S'KW.1 auf1 it i• ._.._ 

fore ~~url.1'1114 \0.,~ th.a •ppUc.&tio.a lM V4mt:.1.llU4Ht \ln<Mtr ti••:ttoa -iftM, 

&"1.eed. 11.---.., as --.~. to .a.ftl1 t.M \tar h~eu• ~t a 

tvrih1;1r IMtrid •t thrM yara 111 wJd.e1l to Mktt r••pouq lo ta. 

Pa'IMNl- oltio• •• pro'fl.r.lofl i);; th'> nu a••llM· 

.1"lV~i-fT'OI~ 

Cop.Y for The SJ. te-£1~8&1 Of-f'i,~or 

(Original filed in Patent Office 2/18/42.) 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-13-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by Chief Financial
Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly
Report of Data I/O Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Joel S. Hatlen, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) |  | The
information contained in the           Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the                financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Joel S. Hatlen
________________________________
Joel S. Hatlen
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer) 
May 12, 2006

---
IN REPLY 

RIFERTO • REF ID : A67 55 • 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

April 8 1 1940. 

Subject: Patent .Application, Ser. No. 300,212, 

C17Ptographic Device 

(M.-l3BA. ) 

To: Mr. William F. Friedman, 

Principal Cryptanal.7st 

War Plana and Training Division, 

Otttce ot the Ohiet Signal Officer. 

1. Thi•"'Will report an action ot the Patent Office in the 

above case and there is submitted for ;rour intonmtion am keeping 

COPJ' of' the Examiner's communication of Nov. 91 19391 together with 

copiea of the patents oi ted against the claims. The copies of Uni tad 

Ste.tea patents are intended fbr your keeping, but you are requested 

with your reply to return the photostata of the t110 British patents. 

2. A tormal response to the official action will be due 

tor filing in the Patent Office not later than May 9, 1940. Meanwhile, 

when you have had an opportunity to stud7 the reference patents, pleaae 

aubmi t a!ll" suggestion• which JOU may wish to offer to asaist in bringing 

out distinctions in favor of your invention owr the art ot record. 

3. It will be noted that tbs Examiner requires division along 

the lines indicated on page 2 of' the official letter; but it ia believed 

that on taking the case up with the Examiner in person that the divisional 

requirement will be •1ved in accordance w1 th the special practice applying to Government cases in this regard. 

Charles A. Rowe, 

Patents Section, Signal Corps 

"R.~ 3-:l. ~ ~ 

re.~ ra.v. "'2. ai r ~ 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-10879

Conference Calendar

 

LUTHER BIRL SNEED, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

NFN HULVEY, Captain; NFN DENTON, 

Library Attendant; NFN TARRANT COUNTY OFFICIALS,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:98-CV-1076

- - - - - - - - - -

February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Luther Birl Sneed, Jr., Texas prisoner # 699758, has filed a

motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal,

following the dismissal of his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b)(1). By moving for IFP status, Sneed is challenging

the district court’s certification that IFP status should not be

granted on appeal because his appeal is not taken in good faith. 

See Baugh v. Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997).
No. 99-10879

- 2 -

Sneed’s brief does not provide any argument that the

district court erred in dismissing his complaint under

§ 1915A(b)(1) on the ground that it was frivolous, malicious, or

failed to state a claim. He states only that he “was not allowed

to confront the defendants” and that the case was being dismissed

because he was indigent and a pauper. Even a pro se appellant

must brief an issue to preserve it for appellate review. Yohey

v. Collins, 985 F.2d 222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we

uphold the district court’s order certifying that the appeal was

not taken in good faith. Sneed’s request for IFP status is

DENIED, and his appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. See Baugh, 117

F.3d at 202 & n.24; 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Sneed’s motions for excusable neglect and to remove

sanctions are inapplicable to this appeal. We have reviewed the

record, and it confirms that the district court did not impose

sanctions in the instant case. These motions are DENIED.

The district court’s dismissal of Sneed’s § 1983 action

under § 1915A(b)(1) counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the dismissal of this appeal as frivolous

also counts as a “strike” for purposes of § 1915(g). See

Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 385-87 (5th Cir. 1996). Sneed

is warned that if he accumulates a third “strike” pursuant to

§ 1915(g), he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal

filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless

he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See

§ 1915(g).

MOTIONS DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
, ":.' -·· 

5a1 

REF ID:A44677 

eCONFIDENTIALe 

e6H9ERIAL 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

FORT GEORGE G. MEADE. MARYLANP 

Serial: 

MEMOBAII>lJM FOR THE SECRJ!D?ARY or THE ABMY 

N IJ725 

3 0 NUV 1960 

8tJBJ'D: Support Requirements of the National Becuri t7 Agenc71 

Fiscal Year 1962 (U) 

REJ!:WCES: (a) NBA Memo for the Secretaey of the Arm::!, 

Serial Rl4o7, subject as above, dtd 8 Apr 6o 

(b) BSA Memo for the Secretaey of the Arm.7, 

Serial Rl549, subject as above, cltd 20 Apr 6o 

1. References (a) and (b) transmitted the support requirements of the Rational Securit7 Agenc7 to be provided b7 the 

Department of the Army for Fiscal Year 1962. Appendix 8 to 

inclosure 3 of reference (a) lists requirements of the RSA installation at Fort George G. Meade, Maryland. 

2. Paragraph 1 of Appendix 8 includes the requirement for 

three 37-passenger bussea, with drivers, to be pro~ded on Alert 

Warnings. These busses are for emergenc7 movement of the RSA 

Alert Cadre, under a concept prescribed by the Secretary of 

Defense. 

3. The promptness V1.th Which the Cadre could be activated 

might have an important bearing on its value in an emergenc7. 

Studies have shown that there are frequent periods of cons1derable 

duration When the vehicles now regul.arl7 assigned to RSA are unavailable because of' off-post use. For these reasons, an4 to 

avoid the dela7 Which would be involved in obtaining the busses 

listed in reference (a) following Cadre activation, it is requested that they be assigned to the RSA motor pool on standb7 

at all times. It is desirable that this assignment be made as 

SOOD as possible. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-28-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

CONFIDENTIAL 
.. , -i()NFIDENTIJ-\9 

Serial: N 4725 

4. When these busses are assigned to the ·BBA motor ~11 the requirement for drivers :tor them, listed in reference (a), 

will no longer exist 1 as motor pool and BSA personnel will be 

available to support this mission. 

-Con JUrnished: . Ct18ASA 

--J4-l-¥!-FRO-r-.2-' -r 

Vice Admiral, UBI 

Director 

Gen G. B. Erskin•, USJ«:-Ret, 

As•t to SecDet, Sp Opns D/I,. JCQ, via sso7JCB 

CO, 11'9rt George G. Meade 

2 

€0NFIBEN'FIA1' 
. .. 

Sl!JfJIBH' 

cc: DIR41(: C: 

AG 

Reading File 

AG-24 

OPS 2 

PROD 4 

TCCM 2 

R/D 2 

CSEC 2 

PEBS 2 

LOG 4 

Tl'G 4 . SEC 

REF ID:A44677 

SE€RE'F • 

Serial: N 4725 

M/R: DOD Directive C-3020.26 of 10 June 1960 requires that Alert 

Cadres be activated as directed by SecDef during times ot increased 

world tension and periods of strategic warnings. SECDEF/OSO Memo 

of 19 Sep 6o prescribes that the HSA Alert Cadre be activated 

automatically in the event of declaration of a Defense Condition I. 

Coordinated with LOG (Mr Guy and Mr Owens) • 

w . .,..,_, ,,, ~ eA.h~ · 

w. R. MCCARl'l/om/~23 Nov 6o/eJ 

SE€RET 

·.
8eoreta191 ot Var 

Vaab1ngton 

D. C. 

REF ID:A39638 

Attentions 'lhe Judge Advocate General 

A 8eorec1 Order under Public 1100. 76th Conpeaa, bav1na reoentlJ bMn ••rved upon, ud ack.Dovledpd bJ, tbe unden1gned in cozmeot1on v.S.th Patent Appl1oa,1on S.1'1.•1 ll\lllber 70,,12, tiled 23 .larch 19,6. tbe s.aventloa coYend bJ the aaid app11oat1on 1a, 1D aooordanee 

vi.th the NCO-ndat1on CODta1D•d 1D the leoNOJ Order, tendered to the 00Yernm11Jt ot t'be United &tat• tor 1ta 

uae. !be application 91 be 1napeoted and oolll•• •de• 

1t dealred. 

ReepecttullJ 1oura, 

vxmu '· ni•xa 182, Q\19 It., l.V. 

Vaab1n1ton 9, D. C • 

MlXil I. IRMIW 

216 So. Penb1DI 1'r. 

Arlington, Y1J'l,1.a1a 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       1,427,567
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,730
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      62,435,572
<DEPRECIATION>                            (35,997,683)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              40,808,713
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     54,371,137
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                40,808,713
<SALES>                                     11,568,267
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,637,734
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,310,727
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,618,390
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,291,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,291,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15




Fleming Companies, Inc.
6301 Waterford Boulevard, Box 26647
Oklahoma City, OK  73126

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited
interim financial information of Fleming Companies, Inc. and
subsidiaries for the sixteen weeks ended April 17, 1999 and April 18,
1998, as indicated in our report dated May 5, 1999; because we did not
perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in
your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the sixteen weeks ended April 17,
1999, is incorporated by reference in the following:

(i)    Registration Statement No. 2-98602 (1985 Stock Option Plan)
       on Form S-8;

(ii)   Registration Statement No. 33-36586 (1990 Fleming Stock
       Option Plan) on Form S-8;

(iii)  Registration Statement No. 33-56241 (Dividend Reinvestment
       and Stock Purchase Plan) on Form S-3;

(iv)   Registration Statement No. 333-11317 (1996 Stock Incentive
       Plan) on Form S-8;

(v)    Registration Statement No. 333-35703 (Senior Subordinated
       Notes) on Form S-4;

(vi)   Registration Statement No. 333-28219 (Associate Stock
       Purchase Plan) on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule
436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of a
registration statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a
report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of
Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
June 1, 1999