alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1


                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


                             CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                          CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Universal Standard Healthcare, Inc.
26500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 400
Southfield, Michigan 48076

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Universal Standard
Healthcare Inc.'s Registration Statements on Form S-8 and on Form S-3 of our
report dated March 25, 1999, relating to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Universal Standard Healthcare, Inc. appearing in the Company's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998.


                                                 BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


Troy, Michigan
March 31, 1999
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held April 7, 2015.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or (954) 423-7977.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday April 7, 2015 at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Donna Powers. For more information please contact: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-                          ( print page 12554)                        1227 or (954) 423-7977 or write: TAP Office, 1000 S. Pine Island Road, Plantation, FL 33324 or contact us at the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org*. The committee will be discussing various issues related to Tax Forms and Publications and public input is welcomed.                

Dated: March 3, 2015.

Otis Simpson,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel. 

[FR Doc. 2015-05365 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       6,027,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,027,260
<PP&E>                                      24,545,658
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              30,572,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          136,590
<BONDS>                                      4,287,003
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,149,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                30,572,918
<SALES>                                      1,846,608
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,986,917
<CGS>                                          552,567
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  552,567
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               348,319
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,086,031
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,086,031
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,086,031
<EPS-BASIC>                                      11.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    11.32


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23**

**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors

LightPath Technologies, Inc. 

We consent toincorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-41705, 333-92017, 333-121389, 333-121385, 333-96083, 333-50976 and 333-50974) on Form S-8 and (Nos. 333-113814, 333-37443, 333-39641, 333-93179, 333-37622, 333-47992, 333-51474,333-127053 and 333-133772) on Form S-3 of LightPath Technologies, Inc. of our report dated September 15, 2006, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of LightPath Technologies, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2006 and 2005, andthe related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended June 30, 2006, which report appears in the June 30, 2006, annual report on Form 10-K ofLightPath Technologies, Inc. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Certified Public Accountants 

Orlando, Florida 

September 28, 2006
##### 



Exhibit 7.1
 Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Amounts in millions of Korean Won)
 2002
    
    2003
    
    2004
    
    2005
    
    2006Pre-tax income from
continuing
operations before
adjustment for
minority interests
in consolidated
subsidiaries or
income or loss from
equity
investees
    
    
    1,636,206
    
    
    
    2,751,793
    
    
    
    5,336,018
    
    
    
    5,468,465
    
    
    
    4,238,167Fixed charges:Interest expenses
and amortization of
debt discount and
premium on all
indebtedness,
etc.
    
    
    332,733
    
    
    
    251,441
    
    
    
    193,694
    
    
    
    149,417
    
    
    
    183,392Appropriate portion
of
rentals
    
    
    885
    
    
    
    1,994
    
    
    
    375
    
    
    
    488
    
    
    
    234Total fixed
charges
    
    
    333,618
    
    
    
    253,435
    
    
    
    194,069
    
    
    
    149,905
    
    
    
    183,626Pre-tax income from
continuing
operations before
adjustment for
minority interests
in consolidated
subsidiaries or
income or loss from
equity investees
plus fixed
charges
    
    
    1,953,268
    
    
    
    2,986,899
    
    
    
    5,507,014
    
    
    
    5,638,149
    
    
    
    4,403,034Ratio of earnings
to fixed charges
under Korean
GAAP
    
    
    5.85
    
    
    
    11.79
    
    
    
    28.38
    
    
    
    37.61
    
    
    
    23.98Ratio of earnings
to fixed charges
under US
GAAP
    
    
    5.58
    
    
    
    11.79
    
    
    
    25.71
    
    
    
    38.27
    
    
    
    24.40
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

CHRISTINA CORRIGAN, *

* No. 13-416V

Petitioner, * Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: October 5, 2015

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * in the amount to which respondent 

* does not object.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Howard D. Mishkind, Mishkind Law Firm Co., L.P.A., Cleveland, OH, for 

Petitioner;

Jennifer L. Reynaud, United States Dep’t of Justice, Washington, DC, for 

Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

On September 28, 2015, petitioner filed a stipulation of fact concerning final 

attorneys’ fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, petitioner 

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent 

for review. Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections 

to certain items. Based on subsequent discussions, petitioner amended her 

application to request $24,626.13, an amount to which respondent does not object. 

The Court awards this amount.

 

1

 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this ruling on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the 

parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website. 
2

On June 25, 2013, Christina Corrigan filed a petition for compensation

alleging that her third Hepatitis B vaccine, which she received on October 22, 

2010, caused her to sustain a vaccine-related injury diagnosed as Bell’s palsy. 

Petitioner received compensation based upon the parties’ stipulation. Decision, 

issued Oct. 5, 2015. Because petitioner received compensation, she is entitled to 

an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). 

Petitioner seeks a total of $24,626.13 in attorneys’ fees and costs. In 

compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner has not advanced any 

reimbursable costs in pursuit of her claim. Respondent has no objection to the 

amount requested for attorneys’ fees and costs. 

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

A lump sum of $24,626.13 in the form of a check made payable to 

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Howard D. Mishkind, of the 

Mishkind Law Firm Co., L.P.A., for attorneys’ fees and other 

litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e).

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this 

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Dan Hoffman, at (202) 357-

6360.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
#### Smith vs. Hart and another.

*When judgment perfected.*

Judgment for relief and costs is not perfected so as to be appealable until the costs are ascertained and inserted; and an attempted appeal from a judgment not so perfected is dismissed, with costs.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Oconto*County.

*W. H. Webster,*for the appellant.

The cause was submitted for the respondent on the brief of *Tracy <& Bailey.*

ORTON, J.

In this case, judgment was rendered for the relief asked in the complaint, and for costs, but the amount of costs is not taxed or inserted in the judgment.

Below, the judgment there is an order or direction by the court, that the clerk “ tax the costs, and insert the amount thereof in the judgment.” The judgment was not perfected so as to allow an appeal therefrom.

In *Cord v. Southwell,*15 Wis., 211, this court held that “ costs constitute a part of the judgment,” and that the judg-mentis “ not perfected until they are ascertained and included.”

The prerequisite of “entry of judgment,” in sec. 9, ch. *264,*Laws of 1860, of an appeal within two years, and in sec. 12, of the service of a bill of exceptions within sixty days, is the same. In *Bonesteel v.*Bonesteel, 30 Wis., 151, this court has held that the costs must be adjusted and inserted in the judg ment before the sixty days in the latter case begin to run.

If other authority were needed upon this point, reference may be had to the decisions in the state of New York, which appear to be nearly uniform, that the judgment is not perfected until the costs are taxed and inserted therein. *Lentilhon v. The Mayor, etc.,*3 Sandf., S. C., 721; *McMahon v. Harrison,*5 How. Pr., 360; *Hunt v. Middlebrook,*14 id., 300; *McMahon v. Allen, 7*Abb. Pr., 1.

*231The appeal was premature, and must be dismissed.

*By the Cov/rt.*— The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

RyaN, O. J., and LyoN, J., took no part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM QUARTERLY
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRELY BE
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                  11,933
<SECURITIES>                                         0                   6,092
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                  14,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                   1,349
<INVENTORY>                                          0                   8,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                  46,041
<PP&E>                                               0                  24,763
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                  10,657
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                  72,757
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                  13,908
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     111
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                  72,757
<SALES>                                         17,565                  34,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,565                  34,186
<CGS>                                            6,953                  13,578
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,953                  13,578
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,341                  30,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,515)                 (9,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,580)                 (3,438)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,935)                 (6,386)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,935)                 (6,386)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.26)                  (0.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.26)                  (0.58)


</TABLE>
REF ID:A39625 

P.APBa No. 27 ---y '1111:-111-DPPA ......... 

·--.. D.CI. 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

WAsH1NGTON RIT Jab 

Plecuejind berm. a communieadonJrom the EXAMINER 

in ch.arfe qf thia application. :.u•r..,,·

111 

{/; ~ 

Henr7 B. Stautte1' Arurr Se curl t;7 Ageno7 The Pentagon Bldg• Waehlng,on 25, v.o. 

r 

" 

Commiasionr of Patmt.. 

~•Room '624 

Applicard: W1111ani P • Pried.man .... et; al 

70,Jμ.2 

Maroh 2s, 19'6 

OF\lPTOORAPHS 

Responsive to amonc.br8nt tiled Oat. 1,, 1948. 

The d~aw1ng and the t1ra' alx llne1. on 

page 10 or the apeo1t1oat1on aPe no• olaar •• to 'b• 

operation ot the appa~atue deso~1oed, 

cancelled l1nea 6 to 10, but the dl1alo 

oomplete aa to how the cormautatoDll' ... l*U 

contacts 32 and 34. Aoool'din~i~-;;:z-..,...,_,~ 

1oanta have 

should be 

shown, contact 32 after 

erate oomtiUtator 7 

bu 41~. 

should 

01' 

to 

alao t<> 1<'1gurea 5 and 7 • 

a to op• 

la depressed to mo•• 

speo1f1oatlon 

al re:i,atlonalllp whel"e'b7 

bav will also oauae bill" 4la. 

3 ot the drawing, end plate '01 

to the outer ~ing ~t oontaat•• 

oonnect1ona 1n a maimer almllar 

'.rhe !naei-tlon S.n line 2 of" claim. laD · 1a 

I S.11proper 1 since tlle worda •eieotrioal paths" aliteaclJ' 

ooour thei-e • 

pproved for Release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 

13526 
' " 

REF ID:A39625 

8.el'lal Bo. 70,412 

In order to avo1d amb1£Ulty, ee:ch dependct 

claim ahould include the nabeie ot the ola11u from wbieh 

1t depends. For 1nstan ce, nuaePal • 13 - abould appear I 

af'ter •01a1m• 1n line 1 ot ola1• 14.. JJote alao olalll 20. 

Cla1ma ;4, ,5, 41 io 44 ••• again rejected 

ae being dl-a'IU'l fio Wlpatentable metnoda .• 

In tlw i"irat Plaoe theae 111athod ala1u are 

unatatutory. They do not reo1te subject matter tl'.iat •T 

be patented. Ketbods of coding and decod ns 11ea1agea 

have been held to be unpatent~ble in Be 

190 Fed. 329. Furthe1 .. roore, the method 

are simply tbe tur...atlons o£ the 

-------

re El'nat 

out no prooea11 

over the paten 

partonne4 

pa~atua t ia recited 

1a well supported b7 ID 

the •tbod claims en 

' 

atentable d1at1notion 

patents olearl7 aho• 

ng wl involves tb.e oontaolling ot'8'1able 

tographla maze b7 1nt.oeddfetig further 

s to the maze and ua1ng the output. The 

ted would not be patentable whethel' done 

eleot~laall7 or b1 hand, It a o~tain ~ app&l"atua 

is eaaen.tlal to the method, then method cla1ma are not 

patentable bocauae a metbod type or ola1m cannot dap«Jd on 

atructUl'e or apparatus tor patentubilit7. !'h8l'e la no limlt 

'" the nud>er ot timea any plain message •J' be oo4ed an4 
REF ID:A39625 

further coded anu decoded. If certain apparatus is 

used to per~orm these steps• then the 1nvont1on la 

1n the appai~atua. 

amended., 

Clalms l4 and 20 would. be allowable U 

Clai~• 1 to 1'• 15 ~o 19. 21 to 35, 

' ;6 to 40 appea~ allowable. 

Cla1me ;4, ;5 and 41 to ~ stand rejected. 

The above rejection 1s made PIBAL. 

·"..
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

SOLID WASTE AND EMERGENCY 

RESPONSE 

January 13, 2014 

Cynthia L. Taub 

Steptoe & Johnson LLP 

1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW 

Washington, DC 20036-1795 

Dear Ms. Taub: 

I am writing in response to your January 7, 2014letter requesting an extension ofthe 

comment period for the Troy Chern Corp Inc site in Newark, NJ. This site was proposed for 

listing on the National Priorities List (NPL) on December 12, 2013 with a 60-day comment 

period that was scheduled to end on February 10, 2014. Your letter indicated that you need 

additional time to locate documents which you believe are relevant to the proposed listing. 

EPA is giving you, and all other interested parties, an additional 45 days to submit 

comments related to the Troy Chern Corp Inc site. All commenters have until March 27, 2014 to 

submit comments. 

EPA will consider all comments received by March 27,2014. Please use Docket ID 

Number EPA-HQ-SFUND-2013-0635 for submittal of your comments via 

http://www.regulations.gov. You may verify receipt of comments by checking back on 

www.regulations.gov (please allow a day or two for web posting). 

ouglas mmon, Chief 

Site A essment and Remedy Decisions Branch 

Office ofSuperfund Remediation and Technology Innovation
<PAGE>

                                 EXHIBIT 23.2


INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 
333-09415 and 333-41279 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 333-09417 
on Form S-8 of Vista Information Solutions, Inc. of our report dated March 
24, 1998 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Vista 
Information Solutions, Inc. as of and for the year ended December 31, 1997, 
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Vista Information 
Solutions, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1998.



MCGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP
San Diego, CA
April 7, 1999
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350.
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PharmaKinetics Laboratories, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James M. Wilkinson, II, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ James M. Wilkinson, II, Ph.D.
---------------------------------
James M. Wilkinson, II, Ph.D.
President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

May 15, 2003
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on (i) Form S-3 (Nos. 333-25995, 333-62155, 333-33726, 333-54616 and
333-55866); (ii) Form S-4, (No. 333-50898); (iii) Form S-8, (No. 333-56343) of
Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. of our report dated February 14, 2001
relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Houston, Texas
March 13, 2001
M A N D A T E

TO THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, GREETINGS: Before our Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, on January 6, 2021, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between CURTIS LEE SHEPPARD, JR., Appellant, No. 08-19-00106-CV and WICHITA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, WICHITA COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK'S OFFICE, 78TH DISTRICT COURT OF WICHITA COUNTY, AND ALL POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellees,

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words: The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no other order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance. WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Eighth District of Texas, in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed. WITNESS, the Clerk of the Court of Appeals, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of El Paso, this April 26, 2021. Elizabeth G. Flores, Clerk

Trial Court No. D-1-GN-16-004721