alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

i 

... 

/f' 

• I 

T PER I~ Afr.6f 3S 6 

- ----··-. 

&.P.O. 923 

J October 1944 

- -~ WiUlaa P • J'riedman, ll&nal Secul'it7 Ageno7 1 

- Office of the Chief Signal Oft1cer, 

W&1hington 25, n.c .. 

near Kr. Friedman• 

l am moat grateful tor 70ur eanpllment8J7 letter regarding the award 

r;t the !.agion ot Merit. I have paand it on to the other five winners of 

the award who are all great:cy pleased with 70UF mention of' their naci.ea. 

l •llo gave 70ur regards to General Akin who was pleased to recei n 

them and who •*eel me to paaa on his thanks., He uid tta t he ia lltill 

hopeful of being able to arrange tor you to visit thi• theater. 

Untort..un&t•l.1' the manent. ia not quite ripe. He added, with a amile, that 

St the delq wre much longer 70u would probablT not came to Australia, 

but would more likol.7 Yi.sit u• in Jlanila. 

I am incloaing tor your apecial interest a copy ot one of the General•• 

J.ateat, ideas 1n T;ype A or,ypt.analJ'ai•. Thia i• not. 79t the t'inal torm that 

will. be employed, but ia an ind!cat.1.on ot what w are aiming at. Th• most 

import.ant change contmplat.ed i• the replactment of th• Rmple pages b7 

ut.iticial umpl.e• not oorreaponding to &Jl7 actual material" Erald.na and I 

bot.h d•l"S.:ved comiderable pleaaure frm the dewl.opmant ot thi• little 

pi-oject. and a.1 tor Colonel Aurell, he wa• tickled be;yond d••cription. 

Plaa1e lq' hello for•• t.o Mra. Friedman and to th• ahild.nn 'tho I 

ii-uet. u. all •11 and. happ7. 

l Incl. 

A• indicated abor•. 

' . ' I 

i 

I /, 

I 

~ I "' I 

tDP Rt8RET '· 

=-~ ......... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--=-----~~ ......... ..._~-= ........ ---. -·-·-~-

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 01-02-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 

13526 

I 

1 .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           7,862
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          31,262
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                18,860
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          19,465
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            19,295
<LOANS>                                         59,976
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 142,182
<DEPOSITS>                                     125,470
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,101
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,697
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 142,182
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,580
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  906
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,486
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 615
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 615
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,871
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,101
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    861
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         861
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       861
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.30
<LOANS-NON>                                        298
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,273
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,273
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,273


</TABLE>
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-85,904-01

EX PARTE MASHAUN LONELL HIRSCHLER, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 13-0615-K368 A IN THE 368TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Pursuant to a plea bargain, Applicant was

convicted of the lesser included offense of robbery and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment. He

did not appeal his conviction. 

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because the State did not disclose that the

alleged victim in the case was shown a photographic line-up and could not identify Applicant in that

line-up. The parties have entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court
2

has determined that Applicant’s plea was involuntary because he was not informed the victim in the

case could not identify him in a photographic line-up prior to his plea. The trial court also found that

the Sheriff’s Office stated that the photo line-up was never documented in a report and was not

turned over to theDistrict Attorney’s Office; the Sheriff’s Office reported that the District Attorney’s

Office never received, nor can the Sheriff’s Office locate, any of the physical evidence, written

statements, or a recording of an in-custody interview with Applicant; the State did not disclose

evidence favorable and material to Applicant; and, Applicant would not have pleaded guilty had he

known that the alleged victim could not identify him in a photographic line-up. Applicant is entitled

to relief. Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Ex parte Kimes, 872 S.W.2d 700, 702-703 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1993).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 13-0615-K368 in the 368th District Court of

Williamson County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of

Williamson County to answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any

necessary bench warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies ofthis opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: November 16, 2016

Do not publish
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13853]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06049]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S. C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S. C. 
1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than March 31, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. The Bradford Powers Leipold 2014 Trust, with Johnson Bank as 
trustee, both of Racine, Wisconsin; to join the existing Johnson Family 
Control Group through the retention of shares of Johnson Financial 
Group, Inc., Racine, Wisconsin, and the indirect retention of shares of 
Johnson Bank, Racine, Wisconsin.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 12, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Assistant Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-06049 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
REF ID:A39748 

• • 

A S S I G U I'd E N T ___ ... _____ __ 

WHEREAS we, Willia~ F. Friedman, or Washington, District ot 

Columbia, and Frank B. Rowlett, of Fast Falls Church, Arlington County, 

Virginia, whose address is Care Office of the Chief Signal Officer, 

Munitions Building, Washington, D.C., have invented certain improvements 

in Cry1,tographs, for which we have made an application for Letters Patent 

ot the ~nited States, Serial Bo. 70,412, filed March 2.3, 19.36, and 

WHEREAS, the invention was made while we were empl01ees of the 

War Department, and pertains to a device useful in the National Defense; 

and 

WHEREAS, the Government or the United states is desirous ot acquiring the entire right, title and interest in and to the said invention 

and in and to any patents that JD8.7 issue thereon. 

POW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and one ($1.00) 

dollar, the receipt or which is herebf acknowledged, we, William F. Friedmand and Frank B. Rowlett, have sold, as"sianed, and tn.nsf81"red, and by 

these presents do herebf sell, assign, and transfer unto the Government 

ot the United States ot .America, as represented by the Secretary of War, 

the entire right, title and 1Dterest, throughout the United states of 

America, and the territories and dependencies thereof', and not elsewhere, 

in and to the said invention relating to improvement in Cryptographs, as 

described, claimed and illustrated in the aforesaid application, Serial 

No. 70,412,, and all Letters Patent issued thereon and an;y continuations, 

divisions, renewals, and reissues or extensions thereof; reserving to 

' 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 01-02-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
! • 

REF ID:A39748 

• • 

ourselves and legal representatives an 1rrevocabl6 and assignable license, 

11ithout payment of royalty, said license to be exclusive, except as to 

manufacture, use and/or sale by or tor the United States Goverment, to make, 

use and/or sell and to license others to make use and/or sell the subject 

matter of said invention relating to improvement in Cryptographs, to the 

full end of the term or terms for which Letters Patent or an;r divisions, 

reissues, renewals, extensions or continuations thereof are or ma7 be 

granted; the said entire right, title and interest to be held by tmGovernment of the United States of America, as represented b,y the Secretary of 

W'ar and his suceessors in office, to the full end of the term or terms for 

which said Letters Patent and 81J1.div1sions, reissues, renewals or extensions thereof are or -r be granted, as tully and entirely as the same 

would have been held by us had this assignment and sale not been made. 

Sworn to and subscribed b;v the said William r. Friedan 

and Frank B. Rowlett bet ore me this dq of 

April, 1936. 

Rotary Public
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 3092

LUIS AMAURIS DIAZ ALMANZAR,

Petitioner

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

( Agency No. A 058

- 293

- 120 )

Present: AMBRO ∗

, KRAUSE

, and BIBAS

, Circuit Judges

1. Motion by Respondent to Recall the Mandate ;

2. Response by Petitioner to Respondent’s Motion to Recall the Mandate ;

3. Respondent’s Petition for Panel Rehearing

.

Respectfully,

Clerk/ tmm

____________________ __ ___________ORDER________________________________

The foregoing motion to recall the mandate is granted. In recognition of the fact that the

Government did not have the opportunity to challenge the decision to make the opinion in

this matter precedential , t he Court will vacate the order of March 29, 2024 publishing the

opinion and vacate the Precedential Opinion entered on that same date. The Clerk is

directed to re

- issue the Court’s original opinion as a Not Precedential Opinion as of the

date of this orde r and immediately re

- enter the mandate. The Government’s petition for

panel rehearing is denied.

By the Court,

s/ Cheryl Ann Krause

Circuit Judge

Dated: July 1, 2024

T mm/ cc: All Counsel of Record

∗ Judge Ambro assumed senior status on February 6, 2023.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 15, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-60517

Summary Calendar

 

ABDAL WAHAB RAJEB TUQAN,

Petitioner,

versus

ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A95 537 536

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Abdal Wahab Rajeb Tuqan (Tuqan), a native and citizen of

Jordan, petitions for review of the decision of the Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from the

immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for asylum

and withholding of removal. The BIA accepted the IJ’s

determination, in light of the discrepancies between Tuqan’s

first and second applications, as well as his testimony at the

immigration hearing, that Tuqan’s testimony was not credible. 
No. 04-60517

-2-

The BIA also found that Tuqan had failed to meet his burden of

proof to present a believable and sufficiently supported claim. 

Tuqan argues that the BIA and the IJ erred in determining

that certain statements were inconsistent, and he blames any

inconsistencies on translation errors or bad advice that he was

given by a translator who allegedly assisted him in preparing his

first application for asylum and withholding of removal. He also

asserts that his supporting documentation did not undermine his

testimony.

We review the BIA’s determination that an alien is not

entitled to asylum or withholding of removal for substantial

evidence and will not reverse the BIA’s determination unless the

evidence compels a contrary conclusion. See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293

F.3d 899, 905 (5th Cir. 2002). Additionally, we will not

substitute our “judgment for that of the BIA or IJ with respect

to the credibility of the witnesses or ultimate factual findings

based on credibility determinations.” Chun v. INS, 40 F.3d 76,

78 (5th Cir. 1994). There is substantial evidence in the record

to support the determination that Tuqan did not credibly or

sufficiently support his applications for asylum and withholding

of removal. Id. at 79; see also In re Y-B, 21 I & N Dec. 1136,

1139 (BIA 1998). The petition for review is DENIED.
.-------·· REF ID : A 7 0 9 B 4 

TO: 

BE 

. C-<nmnd'ns ott1cer 

B1gnal. Secvit7 Agenc7 

A:tl'D:tIOBs *Jar "Philip King, Jr. 

l. Attention 1• iz1T1ted to noeat 4:111CURJ.OD between )laJal' K111a 

of kz:tir:r Ccmmunteaticma Seniue and. Capam Batch ot the Secnar1'7 

D1Tia1oa relat1Te to Action 2 of 'lraaaittal &beet :tJoaa A:rllf1 en-nscat1ons 

tbat the 

·SerTice, 

S16nal 

25 

Securi\7 

Ma1' 19'6.5, 

J.seoc7 

aubJect 

reepmae 

aa above, 

oou.14 

vhan1D 

•tiafactoril.3 

1t was ~ 

be ab-

:m1t.ted a f'ev da18 beyazul the deadll.m aet iD tM 118810 oomunicatian. 

2. It is obserYed. that. iPhell clau1:f'1ad. arn>tasraplaio eqv.1]119D.'8 

are obsolete, and. an .no loDgel" to be retaimd., t.lae7 are deetroJM. It 

ts· also to be noted. that. cr~t~phic equ1pmnte haft no cc•• Nial 

aounterpart and theretare req_uire ccma1derabl• tiwe tr:r procur-.t. 

J'mt these reaaons it. 1a reC<Jl'P'eDd.ed. toJMLt 'Ute folloviDg equ1}1119Dta lae cmaaiclered app.roir!ate for war reeerve until Reh t118 u cleclarecl obaolete1 

a. CODYerter M-l34-C 1 D 

b. Ccmnrter M-2091 A, 3 

c. CODerter li-228 

:l. ConYerter 1'-294 

e. COUftrtelr 11-~ 

t. COATertel' 1t..Jt09 

8. Counrter lll-218() /u . h. Ccmnrter .A\tec'meat Al/GSA-2 

1. Strip Il8T1ce ~lJ8-A 

3·. CSP a, 

.t. Speech Eq,ll1J118D1' RC· 220-B 

1. 8peec1a J:lia1J11181lt O/GSQ-1 

m. Speech Zqu1J118Dt a/QSQ,-2, 3 

D. J'&C81111la Btati-nt M/OD-l, 2 

o. Aataat1o Dnice ~or cbeek'ns llll4 Jl'idilll ..,209 J1a 8114 las 

ae\tillp ,. Strip cutter atU21e& 1n t.11e ~ioD '1l atrtps trzr at.rip 

Dw1oe N-138-A .-/• mP 8". · · 

.. EE ;;_1~1-~ o-e""""c l,....a-ss...,.if.,,..i e-d..,...a_n_d.,...a_p_p_r_ov_e_d,...,f,....or_r_e..,...le_a_s_e ..,...b-y..,..N'""S,...,A_o_n_o.,,...6=---=-o..,,..3--=2,..,,.0...,.14...,...-p-u-rs-u-a-nt-t-o-=E""". o=--. ..,..1 3=-=5"""2,....a 
REF ID:A70984 

.BE 

SISl:S-8 (29 - 19'5) 

q. Jlamlnm lb1a ~ 0-.tal' antre4 ta the Jll"OGCt1aa ~ one-ts. telet;r.pe t.a.Je. 

r. Mo41f'1et COUYerter MJ:-.218() /fJ aD4 ueooia\M pllls'baari 

tar cllec:k1QS b7 Una. . a. !.llor.e podaotion toa1j BDl!/or equ1Jll&Jlta, nWud 1n 

tbe :mnllhctve. ot crntcara,Uc clnioea, which are 

w4 b7 the Si&nal Securi \7 Asme7. 

2 

.BIET 

M. G. JOimS 

Lt.. Colonel, S:lgnel Carps 

Chief 1 8ecur1 t7 D1Y1S10D
-· ~ 

REF ID:A39750 

• • 

: pril 1 1 1936 • 

.Memoran41D 1or Kr• Wlll lu 1 • fri.._, CrJP\ln&l.J1t, ancl 

Mr. Prank B. Rowlett, Jr. Cr)pt&nal.79'1 

War Plana an4 ~ralnlng Dl~leLoa, 

Otflc• ot' tbe Chier s1~"'1 ornaer. 

Subjects Pa~ent APtlio•tion, &er. Ko. 701 412, FileG. Karell 2S, 1111. 

hlVN 'fement ln l!J'JptograpMI 

1. It ha• been detnmln•d that tne lnftntion tormln£ the 

nltJ•ct-11111. t tt.· r or tbe allo'H uit tl ed appUaa t ton la l111>ertnn t to tJ• 

a~'\ snd def'•n• et the Ua1 te4 Btatee, aa4 1' l• therefore 4a11n& 

tbat the •P'Pl1c111." 1on 'be pla.eM md•r Seotloa MM, 1le'fiae4 Staht••• 

•• -..nte4, u.s.c., tUl• 35 11 1eot.loa 17. 

2. In purRance wl'\h the toregol.ng and ln aooorch1.nc1 wltla 

A. :R. llO-ISO, P11r. I, Cla11 II), an appropriaw •HS.,..nt w1t1as title 

of \he ln'ten\lon and applloatloa therefor 1• the Unlte4 ltate1 11 \1'91\e-

•l\tet harft1 tll tor n101l·Uo11. .Attar uen'1oa ••14 •••1...-nt 11 te lie 

ntwut 'hrough ab.,..l• aa.4 'ranalt\e4 to 'he PAtwit• Section for 

n.e•• .. l'J aotlon. 

s. w. ''anl•r. 

Lint. Col. Slp&l Corp•, 

Aetilll 11ant1w. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           44333
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   374598
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     366985
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1395965
<PP&E>                                         1721963
<DEPRECIATION>                                  837397
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2945780
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                         501635
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        147295
<OTHER-SE>                                      682775
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2945780
<SALES>                                        2045065
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2045065
<CGS>                                          1724321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1724321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                165008
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               27484
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 135725
<INCOME-TAX>                                     41667
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              94058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     94058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.65
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 5, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-50289 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus EDGAR DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-03-CR-120-4

-------------------- Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Edgar Dominguez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, aiding and abetting, and possession with intent to distribute cocaine. He argues that the evidence of his guilty knowledge was insufficient to support either conviction. Because Dominguez did not renew his motion for judgment of acquittal at the close of all evidence, our review of the sufficiency of the evidence is limited to determining whetherNo. 04-50289 -2- there was “a manifest miscarriage of justice.” See United States
v. Green , 293 F.3d 886, 895 (5th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted). To find a miscarriage of justice, “the record must be devoid of evidence of guilt or the evidence must be so tenuous that a conviction is shocking." United States v. Avants , 367 F.3d 433, 449 (5th Cir. 2004). The record in this case is not devoid of evidence of Dominguez’s guilty knowledge, nor is his conviction shocking.
See id. The jury could have inferred that Dominguez had knowledge of the conspiracy and knowingly possessed cocaine basedon: (1) the extent of his communications with the other codefendants, especially Stephen Vasquez, during the time of the transaction; (2) the fact that Vasquez indicated to Sgt. Smith that Dominguez was the source of the cocaine; (3) the fact that the shoe box Dominguez delivered contained cocaine; (4) the fact that the shoe box obviously contained something other than shoes; and (5) the fact that, after delivering the box, Dominguez waited in the parking lot instead of driving off. Consequently, the conviction is AFFIRMED.