alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EDWARD JAMES ARTZ, as Trustee of The Edward James Artz Trust,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
ROYCE T. FLORA, Maricopa County Treasurer; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 20

- 16321

D.C. No. 2:20

- cv

- 01195

- JZB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Stephen M. McNamee, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted Jan uary 20 , 202 1 * *

Before: McKEOWN
, CALLAHAN , and BRESS, Circuit Judges

.
Edward James Artz appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action seeking to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Kilgore v. KeyBank, Nat’l Ass’n
,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JAN 25 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 16321

718 F.3d 1052, 1057 (9th Cir. 2013) (denial of motio n to compel arbitration);

Omar v. Sea

- Land Serv., Inc. , 813 F.2d 986, 991 (9th Cir. 1987) (sua sponte

dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6))

. We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Artz’s action because Artz failed to

allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim. Se e Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S.
662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual
matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face”

(citation and internal quotation marks omitted)) ; see also Kilgore , 718 F.3d at 1058

( Federal Arbitration Act mandates that the district court “ shall direct the parties to

proceed to arbitration on issues as to which an arbitration agreement has been

signed ,” and the di strict court must determine “whether a valid agreement to
arbitrate exists” (citations, internal quotation marks, and emphasis omitted) ).
We reject as without merit Artz’s contention s that the district court violated

his constitutional rights , or otherwis e acted with impropriety or gave the

appearance of impropriety in its conduc t

.
Artz’s “ motion to obtain sealed document ” (Docket Entry No. 8) is denied as

unnecessary

. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(a) (record on appeal includes original papers

and exhibits file d in the district court) ; 9th Cir. R. 30

- 1.3 ( pro se appellant need not

file excerpts of record)

.
///3 20

- 16321

All other pending motions and requests are denied.

AFFIRMED.
JAMES F, MARTENS'

Kplll H. Tooo

L¡.cY L. LEoNARD

MlnrnNs, ToDD, LnoN.lnr, T.Lylon & Anlnlcn

A GpNpReI PARTNERSHIP

301 CoNcnsss AVENUE, Surrs 1950

AUSTIN, TEXAS 78701

(s12) 542-9898

nex(512) 542-9899

www.textaxlaw.com

AMANDA G, TAYLOR

D¡,NrEr.ln V. AHLRICH

ALLEGRA D, HILL

Attorneys at Law Attorneys at Law

*Board Certified in Tax Law

Texas Board of Legal Specialization

E-MAIL: ataylor@textaxlaw.com

May 4,2ors

Via Electronic Filing

Court of Appeals, Third District of Texas

Attn: Jeffrey Kyle, Clerk

Price Daniel Sr. Building

2o9 West r4tr' Street, Room ror

Austin, Texas 787ot

Re: Court of Appeals Number: og-14-oo51o-Cv

Trial Court Number: D-r-GN-13-oo2811

Noah S. Bunker, Poul Carrell, Euerett Brew Houston, Jr., W.

Andrew Buchholz, Scott J. Leíghty, Jad L. Dsuís, ond HoIIy

Clause u. Tracy D. Strandhagen,

Dear Mr. Kyle:

Please be advised that I will be out of tor¡rn from June 10 to June t4,

2oLS, for personal travel. Accordingly, I respectfully request that the Court

not schedule oral argument in the above-referenced matter on June 10,

2oLS. Should you have any questions or need any additional information,

please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you for your attention to this

matter.

ACCEPTED

03-14-00510-CV

5141271

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

5/4/2015 3:04:51 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 RECEIVED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/4/2015 3:04:51 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Third Court of Appeals

May 4,2015

Page2

AGT: san

Sincerely,

By:

G. Taylor

cc Daniel Byrne, via electronic mail

Lessie Fitzpatrick, via electronic mail

Christine Burgess, via electronic mail
**Exhibit 21.1**

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY**

 

| **Name of  Subsidiary**        | ** ** | **Place of Incorporation** |
|--------------------------------|------------|----------------------------|
|                           |       |                       |
| Overland Storage (Europe) Ltd. |       | United Kingdom             |
|                           |       |                       |
| Overland Storage SARL          |       | France                     |
|                           |       |                       |
| Overland Storage GmbH          |       | Germany                    |
|                           |       |                       |
| Zetta Systems, Inc.       |       | Washington                 |

 

----
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  Jon Elliott,  President,  CEO,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of
Baymark Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10QSB of the  Company  for the  period  ended
April 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         Dated:  June 21, 2005           Officer:   Jon Elliott

                                        Name:       /s/ Jon Elliott
                                                    ----------------------------
                                        Position:  President, CEO
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-565V 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

HUNTER HORSEY, on behalf of * 

G.H., a minor child, * Special Master Corcoran 

 * 

 Petitioner, * 

v. * Filed: October 7, 2016 

 * 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND * 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Rule 21(a); No Judgment; Order 

 * Concluding Proceedings. 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

 On October 6, 2016, Petitioner filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal in the abovecaptioned case, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). 

 Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a)(3), the above-captioned case is hereby 

ordered to be concluded. The Clerk of the Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not 

enter in the instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

 /s/ Brian H. Corcoran

 Brian H. Corcoran

 Special Master 

 

1

 Because this decision contains a reasoned explanation for my actions in this case, I will post it on the United States 

Court of Federal Claims website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 (2012). As 

provided by 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4)(B), however, the parties may object to the published decision’s inclusion of 

certain kinds of confidential information. Specifically, under Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party has fourteen days within 

which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or 

financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure 

of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). Otherwise, the whole 

decision will be available to the public. Id.
• / 

REF ID:A521652a 

WAR DEPARTMEN--

ARMY SERVICE FORCES 

T.~A;lllPSMITTAL SHEET 

249 

Office of the Chief Si~na.1 ,_ Officer Action 1 

TO Sig;nal Securit~ Division Room 3C-340 (Service, division, or organization) (Location) 

Nir. William F. Friedman 

(Branch or unit) (Attention) 

DESCRIPTION 23 December 1943 

OF ATTACHED (Originator) (Addressee) (Date) COMMUNICATION / 

Pat!2nt Applicl;l.:tiQn of w. F. Friedman 

(Subject) (File No.) 

FROM - Leg; al Division 4-D-333 3702 

(Service, division, or organization) (Location) (Telephone) 

Referring to· your telephone inquiry concerning your 

u. s. Patent Application Serial Number 107,244, it is found that 

this application will not become abandoned prior to 26 ~larch 

194tf: A letter from the Commissioner of Patents to this effect 

is inclosed herewith. 

Atch: Communication dd 10 April 1941 

I 

~!(~~:;.-er 

Donald K. LipLi cott 

Lieutenant Colonel, Signal Corps 

Patents & Inventions Counsel, Legal Division 

~ 

~0LG-3a Ex. 3702 

3 Decembe_r 1943 

I 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 

W. D., A.G. O. Form' No. 0105 

April 7, 1943 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFIC~ 0--519134 
I • 

ADDRESS ONL. Y 

THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS 

REF Il):A521652e 

' ' ~ ' WASHINGTON, O. C. I ~ 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

WASHINGTON 

Bx !tt,e W1lll&Dl F~ ·Frliedman; : 

Ser a No. 107 ,244,, .. :: 

F1led October 231 19,6, : 

Cryptographs. : 

- In eomplianee with the request in the letter 

ot the Secretary of War, dated April l, 1941, this 

application 1s continued under the pJ10viaiono of 

u. s. Code, Title 35 1 Section ;7. 

Thia applicatiQn will not become abandoned 

prior to the expiration or three years from the 

date or the la&t Office action# .:&&v~ii .. ~@J1". 

'/' '·•,, { -»~:~; :: :.'..,,~,_, 

:Mr. William D. Hall, 

Pa.t<a11t Section, 

·:,, •. ,,. • •• r-.. ,t-;::r;:-;!,,•:r1: :.·: 

rl 

ii 

Oomiaaioner. 

Chief ot the Air Corpa, War Departm$nt 1 Washington, D. c.
. :, 

<:.~ . . ,~t;~,,: 

~., ... -,,.·:.\j.c..: 'l\.C- : · ".'_ ~J~a-.. • t 

< ~ •• • 

,, -~- ,'" 

REF.ID:~21321 

1) 

JA'pprov;ed for Release by NSA on 12-16-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 

:/~~ . 

;.~-~~-~ 

''t·' 

,· l'-;:~<;~i\~/ :;; 

, ..... ~:>):~r~··· i 

'.r ._-. 

l''
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joel F.
Gemunder, President and Chief Executive Officer of Omnicare, Inc. (the
Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The
  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended September
  30, 2006 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of
  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
  or 78o(d)); and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | 2. | The
  information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                            

Date: November
9, 2006

| |  |                                        
| |  | ---------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Joel F.
  Gemunder                 
| |  |                                        
| |  | Joel F.
  Gemunder                     
| |  | President
  and Chief Executive Officer

---
<PAGE>   1
                                  [EXHIBIT 11]

                         NORTH FORK BANCORPORATION, INC.

              COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON EQUIVALENT SHARE
                                  JUNE 30, 2001
                                   (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                         THREE MONTHS ENDED                SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  JUNE 30, 2001  JUNE 30, 2000   JUNE 30, 2001   JUNE 30, 2000
                                                                  -------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                <C>            <C>             <C>              <C>
Net Income....................................................     $78,219,145    $86,019,038     $156,646,203     $87,930,724

Common Equivalent Shares:

Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding....................     159,391,536    171,671,916      159,300,171     166,994,366
Weighted Average Common Equivalent Shares ....................       1,781,142      1,174,971        1,669,741       1,149,566
                                                                   -----------    -----------      -----------     -----------
Weighted Average Common and Common Equivalent Shares..........     161,172,678    172,846,887      160,969,912     168,143,932
                                                                   ===========    ===========      ===========     ===========

Net Income per Common Equivalent Share - Basic................           $0.49          $0.50            $0.98           $0.53
Net Income per Common Equivalent Share - Diluted..............           $0.49          $0.50            $0.97           $0.52
</TABLE>




                                       23
.. • REF IiAA36334.a. 

LI C~SE • 

WHEBEAS, Vtilliaa F. Medcan, a citif'en of the l.mited f;1.ates; and; 

WHEREAs, in pursuance ol said employment the undersigned has invented certain improvements in 

EL"!!:i'TR:H AL S:fSTB" 

tor which the undersigned is abput to make application tor Letters Patent ot the 

United States; and 

WHEREAS, the nature of my employment, and the conditions and circumstances 

under which said invention was made, are such as to justly and lawtully entitle 

the Government of the United States of America to have a non-exclusive license 

and right to make and use said invention, together with any and all improvements 

thereon and inventions relating thereto that the undersigned has made or may hereafter make while employed and engaged by the United States Government; 

NOW, THEREJ!ORE, in consideration ot the premises the undersigned does hereby give and grant unto the Govermnent ot the United States ot .America a nonexclusive license to make, to have made, to use and/or to sell, said inyent:l.on 

as described in the specitication executed by the undersigned on _ .. e.. v.. c.. n__ _ 

-aM11•wat-oiilt!E!a•PeilRF.iw._~·1iliflir------------· said non-excluai Te 1:1.oense to extend 

to any and all Letters Patent which may be granted tor said invention, (including all divisions, reissues, continuations, and extensions thereot) together 

with any and all improvements thereon and inventions relating thereto made by the 

undersigned while employed or engaged by the United States Qovermnent, or tor . ~ 

w.hich the undersigned may herealter make application tor Letters Patent while employed or engaged by the United States Qovermnent1 reserving to the u.nderaigned 

in each case the unrestricted possession ot all other patent rights not hereby 

or otherwise licensed to the Government ot the United States ot America. Said 

license hereby granted or agreed to be granted shall extend throughout the United States, its territories and dependencies, and all foreign cou.ntries and shall 

continue in force tor the full term tor which said Letters Patent may be granted. 

SIGNED at Arl ;ngt.on Cn11nj·y , State ot.._y.,, ... • r1io4tz..,i .... n ..... 1.aa...._ ____ _ 

r. ~-~---l_s_t ___ day ot ____ A~u.gu~s-t..._ __ ~-~~• 19_.44.....,~- () f,l~. r f"- .f.-Y Signed: 

/o "'/Z, "'/ti/ ...;M:;;;ar;;;;.;k;;..;.;Rh_oa;.;,;,d;;.;s--.. ____ _ 

/s/ Uary c. ~."ha:ipson 

/s/ \.illiam s:'. Frie¢.;an 

roved for Release b NS on 07-23-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352
ID:A67435 

_________ .. ___________ ......._ __________ _ 

0-- - t::r- x'MA..e 

, _ __,,,,__ ___ --=------------------- - -

---------~------_._ ____ c::r _____ ~_~_u __ __,,___ ___ + __ ~- t:J 

• 

I 

l --

p~~--

I 

... 

' 

J 

C3 "' ... ... - - - .. - • + - ... _ .... --*--b -----· --r 

"--± 

t:> ~---c---r -

roved for Release b NSA on 09-10-2013 ursuant to E.O. 1352 
REF ID : A67 4}~ q 

,..... - ;/ ~ar=i - -- - / "' a. -...__ ~ 

,/μ,. ..... . 'Q 

, - """k 

...., 

/ 

- ..... -i.. 

~- -..._ - n I 

... \ 

\ 

?- - \ j 

_l_ ~ " 

~ ·->' 

@ 

-+----=- -=-+ l_-1 

----

rJ 

3'1. '11.32: 

" 

,, cu~ 

--~ -- -++ ____..~- Cv 

loo 

~ @ (l, 

a, 

E" 
----·------

-tt- ~tt-- --

---------

----·------·-.. 

--------r---..--~----------

' __. ______ .__..____ -----

--..----t-----r - - -------------

----------+~::;:::,.r--- ----_____________ ...,.. \ -------------- .__-+.L-~--~~~--~----~~--~~--~~----------_.. I 

------------ --------

--~----~--- ' / -~------- - -, -----

-- ,~' =- ---- --f~-..- ·---------------------- -~----J-- ·t-----· 

·---""'!!'1""4- ~-~-~-A-----l-~----- ------ - -------- -

----------~---~~--~;; ~ 

:.........::;;;;;;::,;;o;;~*>--~--------....-·-==!!!ft'I!!!!=-=~- ~......, _________ _ 

-----~-------------- -----------

------------ -----·~--------· 

--~~------~------------~__Ji:.: 

------------- ----- ----------· 

------- --- - - ----~-·---
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 15-15095

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:15-cr-00007-MW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

 versus

JERMAINE WINTERS, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Florida

________________________

(November 17, 2016)

Before HULL, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Case: 15-15095 Date Filed: 11/17/2016 Page: 1 of 2 
2

Jonathan Dingus, appointed counsel for Jermaine Winters, has filed a motion 

to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record 

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of 

merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Winters’s convictions and 

total sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 15-15095 Date Filed: 11/17/2016 Page: 2 of 2
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600109

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

MARK A. TAMBURELLO

Staff Sergeant (E-6), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Major Michael D. Zimmerman, USMC.

For Appellant: Major Benjamin A. Robles, USMC.

For Appellee: Lieutenant Taurean K. Brown, JAGC, USN; Major 

Cory A. Carver, USMC.

_________________________

Decided 17 November 2016

_________________________

Before CAMPBELL, RUGH, and HUTCHISON, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent, but may be cited 

as persuasive authority under NMCCA Rule of Practice and 

Procedure 18.2.

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

At a contested general court-martial, officer and enlisted members 

convicted the appellant of a sexual assault in violation of Article 120, 

Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (2012). The members 

sentenced the appellant to six months’ confinement, reduction to pay grade 

E-1, and a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority approved the 

sentence as adjudged.

In the sole assignment of error, the appellant avers that the military 

judge erred in the findings instructions. Without objection at trial, the 

military judge instructed the members, in part, “If, based on your 
2

consideration of the evidence, you are firmly convinced that the accused is 

guilty of the crime charged, you must find him guilty.” Record at 221, 548. We 

found no error in the use of the same challenged reasonable doubt instruction 

in United States v. Rendon, __ M.J. __, No. 201500408, 2016 CCA LEXIS 643, 

at *26 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 1 Nov 2016), and in accordance with that 

holding, we summarily reject the appellant’s assignment of error here. United 

States v. Clifton, 35 M.J. 79 (C.M.A. 1992).

The findings and sentence are affirmed.

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL 

Clerk of Court
I 

... --- - --

Roum' 5r~Ja REF :MliD :11d17 715 "A 

... lll'PARTMENT OF COMMERCE W 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

Paper No. 3 AU-~1Diu1 nepei:&ln1 llals 

AddrlU Oft" 

'"l'MC-mlmlD_ol..._.._ ............ o.c ... ...... .., ....... ,..,._ WASHINGTON ldAIL..:!D 

..,.... .... uould ............ namlli:r • dale or nu .... and nmn or 

lhuaeiPlicn•I 

Pleue Ind beloio a communication from the EXA'JlllNBR i11 

claal'ge of this application. Q . ~ N"V23 1935 

... 11--3 ~G1111111111oncro/1' ... Applioant: i1.:t'.~'r!.Jd.:1..!D e-c al 

Robert V.Laughlln • Charles 

,\. Bowe 

C/o ~bier o~ the ~1r Cor»• 

Muni t1oos Bldg. C1t7. 

Ser. No. J6,868 

Fi1ed Au~. l~, 1915 

For SYSJ: 3.lt t'C, :1 l'lh!1:.JO:·.IZ.L~G 

TI;l:. ar.;L .. ·rxo?;:-: OF l !..:.C'l1i11CAL 

Cii;:UrrJ 

Retorence ma4e ot record: 

Dwllop 200/153•4 U::t 

Applicant's d19closure is incomplete and doe a not 

oomply with 'he requiremon'• or tho sta'u'o· Tile deTioe aa 

d1aolase4 ls wlinau~ ut111'7· 'l'hore ta a rete:rence made to 

tbe uae or ihtt devtoe in a card aor,1n8 nachiaa but no 41aoloaure or aucb card sorting ~=btne,nor how the present 

lnYentlon ls adapted to auoh use,la raa.4e. It the 4lsolose4 

1nvea~ton 1• ode~ted tor use with a kno1111 machine tbnt 

a!!olliae abould be !ll"O.Perly 1 den'i1tla4 by pat;eo:ts or publloatlon•. 

The olallll• are :re3eo'84 aa coYor1ng a 4nlce without utlll~y aa 4laoloae4. 

The returenoa ci,ed shawa circuits aontrolla4 bJ' 

cam 25 an4 centrifugal 11 operating on switch devloea 8 cad 

18. 

Ola1ma l to 3 ai-e turtber rejected aa reading on 

Dunlop, o1'&e4. 

Appllaan'&'s lnveatlon, 1t an7. appears ,o, be ln 

the nltcb 4eviaa and lta coa1;rol11ne•lementa nncl not 1D an7 

aircul' relatlonahlps. 'l'hla a\ructu1'9 sppeera ~ova~ and ·r~en 

Cbe disclosure ta clear ala.l!!ta to tbe structl1re \"t!.l be allavecl. 

BXAllDIEB. 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-06-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§ 

----- -- - - ----- - - :----- -=-----= -----=- --=- - - -