alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1******

Corel Corporation

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

Years Ended November 30, 2002, 2001 and 2000****

****Included in accounts receivable are the following reserves and related
activity:****

|Year Ended        | Description                     | Opening Balance | Additions             | Deductions | Ending Balance
|----------------- | ------------------------------- | --------------- | --------------------- | ---------- | --------------
|                  |                                 |                 | (In thousands of
US$) |           
|                  |                                 |                 |                       |            |               
|November 30, 2002 | Promotional rebates             | $1,355          | $179                  | $1,355     | $179          
|                  | Sales Reserve                   | 18,283          | 8,362                 | 20,993     | 8,005         
|                  | Allowance for doubtful
accounts | 7,711           | 3,596                 | 1,878      | 6,470         
|                  |                                 |                 |                       |            |               
|November 30, 2001 | Promotional rebates             | 2,617           | 5,437                 | 6,699      | 1,355         
|                  | Sales reserve                   | 18,788          | 41,720                | 42,225     | 18,283        
|                  | Allowance for doubtful
accounts | 8,206           | 4,142                 | 4,637      | 7,711         
|                  |                                 |                 |                       |            |               
|November 30, 2000 | Promotional rebates             | 3,277           | 17,433                | 18,093     | 2,617         
|                  | Sales reserve                   | 40,929          | 8,210                 | 30,351     | 18,788        
|                  | Allowance for doubtful
accounts | 6,720           | 3,696                 | 2,210      | 8,206
Exhibit24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWNALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes andappoints each of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T.Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawfulattorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for himand his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connectionwith the REVLON CONSUMER PRODUCTS CORPORATION (the"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Form10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation oron behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of theCorporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including thispower of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and anyapplicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has signed these presents this 23rd day of February,2004.

|        |  |        |  |                   |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|--------|--|--------|--|-------------------|--|--|--|--|--|--|
|   |  | /s/    |  | RONALD O.PERELMAN |
|   |  |   |  | RONALD O.PERELMAN |
|        |

----
\ 

\ 

I 

I 

REF Ii:>"~A414BB~ :~-:_) 

.... .._ .. _,!_ 

IN RllPLY Rll~ER TO 

----~l.Da~l'ill01v1s10N 

am Bes earo h 

jom1bo 

Colonel George Pabyan, 

P. s. Bmc 435, 

Ch1oago, Illinois 

Sy 4ear Fabyen1 

!• 

"' 

WAR DEPARTMENT, 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER, \. 

WASHINQTON. 

6 001Dbarv 1919 

. Aolmowledge reoe1pt of. yOD.r oommmioati on of October 4, 1919, · 

We are"eenc11ng you herewith 100 cipher tapes representing a i\v1>1ca.l daq's 

bllslness. 

Your prompt and oonscientious aotion in ini'orming tbs Chief 

Signal Of:t:ioer about tbe error in the i:reoeding bat.oh Of tai:es is very 

maoh appreolated. We very much rogi-et that this mistake occurred because we 

realise the trouble and waste Of tlme it caused your operating force. It 

is hoped tl:lat no repetltlan of this nature will be experienced in tbe aooompanylng lot. Every possibls preoaution has been talen this time to prevent a 

reO'QJ'l'GnO e. 

Attention is agaln 1JJV1ted to the lett9J' aooompanying the 

previous batch Of cipher tapes. All the remarks contained there in applying 

to tbs previOllS batch of tapes apply to thio lot. Eaoh individual cipher 

tape sent ydu haS been daaiphered and an English oopy printed. These, 

together w1 th the maeterr tapes a.nd original plain text tapes, are kept 

on tile here. No triak enaipbn•nent has been :reSOl"ted to.by this office. 

lilo de~tura i'l"om the Pl'evious procedure has been nade w1 th the exception 

that no disinterest~d oftloer hes been aallod in to cheok the tapes in 

ordGr to save tlme., 

We would be pleased to receive i'l"om you a aopy of tie addendum to your first paper upan .the proposed solution of this cipher which 

you fbl'WB!'ded to the Mill tary Intelllgenoe Dlv isl cm. That Division premised 

to send a oopy of this paper to this office· but e.s it me moved its office 

to New York City, it is presurred tmt tba upset of offioe conditions has 

prevented the forwarding ~ a copy of this report to 'this office to date. 

Was not aware of the feat that Tro~t had reaohed Washingtnn, 

but shall take great pleasure in looking him up at an eaTly opportunity. 

Regards to all at Riverbank. 

Vary tru~ yours, 

l!\pproved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352e 

,\ 

I 

I 

~ 

: 

I 

! . 

I 
P 0 BOX 435 

Dear Colonel Mauborgne: 

REF ID : A414 ~r~.6-~ 

\ll-J 

GEORGE F'ABYAN 

CHICAGO 

Oct.4 1 1919. 

I carefully note the communication of September 30th, 

giving us a concrete example of wh~t you intended to convey when you drew 

the circle and divided it into four quarters. 

I am sorry about the error on the tapes,because we 

had already pu~ considerable work on them, at the same time, we realized 

under the circumstances, that it would amount to nothing as a test if we 

continued. 

The Trotts are in Washington, as I suppose you know. 

Please give my compliments to Mrs. Mauborgne. 

Lt. Col. J".O.Mauborgne, 

Engineering and Research Division, 

Signal Corps, 

Washington, D. C. 

Sincerely yours,
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Eric L. Kelly, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Overland Storage, Inc.;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 25, 2010



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    ERIC L.
KELLY                 
|Eric L. Kelly,                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

                                        October 19, 1999



SmarterKids.com, Inc.
200 Highland Avenue
Needham, MA 02494

     RE:  Registration Statement on Form S-1
          (File No. 333-86787)
          --------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This opinion relates to an aggregate of 5,175,000 shares of common stock,
par value $.01 per share ("common stock"), of SmarterKids.com, Inc. (the
"Company"), which are the subject matter of a Registration Statement on Form S-1
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") on
September 9, 1999, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement
on Form S-1 as filed with the Commission on October 19, 1999 (the "Registration
Statement").

     The 5,175,000 shares of common stock covered by the Registration Statement
consist of 5,149,500 shares being sold by the Company, of which 649,500 shares
are subject to an over-allotment option granted by the Company to the
underwriters (the "Underwriters") named in the prospectus (the "Prospectus")
incorporated by reference in the Registration Statement, and 25,500 shares
subject to an over-allotment option granted by certain stockholders of the
Company to the Underwriters.

     Based upon such investigation as we have deemed necessary, we are of the
opinion that when the 5,149,500 shares of common stock to be sold by the Company
pursuant to the Prospectus have been issued and paid for in accordance with the
terms described in the Prospectus, such shares of common stock will have been
validly issued and will be fully paid and nonassessable.  Further, we are of the
opinion that the 25,500 shares of common stock to be sold by the stockholders of
the Company pursuant to the Prospectus have been validly issued and are fully
paid and nonassessable.

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the
Registration Statement and to the reference to our firm in the Prospectus under
the caption "Legal Matters."

                              Very truly yours,



                              /s/ Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP
                              TESTA, HURWITZ & THIBEAULT, LLP
. " :... " .... 

-

• 

REF ID:A39767 

' WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL. OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

Aagut 31, 1935 

.· 

I 

l. Tb11 is to record cert.ala taet.9 J.a comectioa •l th th• 

iaYe:aUoa ot sneral alterat1Te •au·ot proYidbc an aper1o41c 

diaplaQMllt ot the lftlbat.1tution ciplaw wbeel• ot a ciJ*tr •- cmiae •• graat.ed la alaia 17 ot the paten •~1•t1oaa baYlac 

rater ... to Conerter 'f7pe 11-1)4-!2.1

' L l··r\-r.. .. , "--'··· ... - "<" 1'\': '~'~'1 .. ,01 i~ .,, 

2. It 1• clell1red. to record here that the tuadaaeatal priaaiple ot wWlf; oae or w-e comu.tators in coaJwtloa with a set 

of 1el.eotor •gn•t• •• a aeaas tor efteotbg the aperlodlo d1epla0411198t• d11cnaaHd 1ll par. 1 i1 the contribot.lon ot frau B. 

Rowlett. 

). The aub•id1u7 pr1aa1ple ( nbaidlarJ to that set torth 

in par. 2) ot proclaelllc aper1od1c diapl.aceaenta (discuased la 

par. 1) ot the 11u'batit11t1011 cipher wh .. la b,y' ... na ot an 1-lepe.nd•t set. ot ca.mutators oontaiaiJlg contacts equal 1n -ber 

to the imaber ot nbstitution cipher wheel• to be displaced, 1• 

the $1Rtr1bllt.1on ot !':rank B. Rowlett. 

4. The nb1idia17 principle (nba1d1.aey to that 1et :Corth 

in par. 2) of produoiag aperiodic diaplac••nta (discuaaed la 

par. 1) ot the 1Ubat1tut1on cipher wheel• bf aaana of aa iadepnclent 

set of eipber •hMl•, hereiaaf'ter called the control cipher wheels, 

aad ba'ri.na th• latter cipber wheel• 14..tiaal in nuaber or contacts 

&lad OOD•truct1oD with the toraer ao that all cipher wheel• are 

illterchang•ble, la the!! ont.rlbution ot Wllllaa F. l'rledma. 

5. The nbllidi&r;r principle (nbld.cU.ar"J" to that set torth in 

par. 2) ot prodlldltg the aperiodic diaplao•enta (di90Wlaed. in par .. 1) or the nbatituU.oa clpller wheel• - Mall• ot • aeooad ••t or 

COllVol contact• • •ch taae ot each ot the Rbat1tut1on cipher 

wheels th•••lYH1 a.S pro"ri.cliDi ap.,ropriate electrical circnd.ta 

tor the control aoataot.a to go•ern the operatloa ot tba d111plaoeMat MCbui•11 la t.be contrlbatioa ot J'raak B. Bo•l•tt. 

6. The nb81dl&J7 principle (nbaidlaey to that aet forth 

1n par. 2) ot producbg the apar1od1a cl111placeae11ta (diacueed 

la par. 1) of the 81lbat1t.utloa cipher wheel.a by aeana of the .._ ..t of 11Ubatitution contaota operatlag in coaaection with a 1aJ11 

1Witob which matea the•• contact• ael'Te tor aubatitution aDd 

ooaVol in altar1111.te aeq,ueace, 1• the cont.ribatlon of J'raak B. 

Bowlett. 

I ,~. 

,.,.~·~~ .. ..,.(.\... ''· 

pproved for Release by NSA on 09-30-2013 pursuant to E.O. 

1352 
REF ID:A39767 

• 

'• Th• appUoaUon of the pr1nalple or aperiodl• dlaplao .. ... , ot nbat1tu\1oa cipher wheel• to 017ptograph• ot the wS.,lnal 

w.- t7pe (ln whiob th• electrical c1rG111t through the a1pber 

•h•l• la rnereed lf' aeana ot a r•Terliac cipher whHl and ac•ln 

aoaduoted \broagh t.h• other oipbw wh•el• Wore r•obl1t1 the 

•11.U11g el .. t) 1• the oontrlbation or IUUam F. Fr1edmu. 

8. Th• fGl"e&Oillg taota will 'be uHd a• a basia tor eftluation 

and division ot laterest in all ti•nc1&l benetit1 which 97 aeane 

troa t.he proseou\10• ot th• invention and 1ta reduction to praotioe. 

Wlt•••H•I
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 07, 2018.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, November 07, 2018

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0134. AMBROSE B. KING JR. v. CORNELIUS OSKAM .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of Superior Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV297448
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David W.
Froesel, Jr., Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Omnicare,
Inc. (the Company), do hereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The
 Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended June 30,
 2008 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of section
 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
 78o(d)); and
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | 2. | The
 information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                     

Date: July 31,
2008

| |                                                    
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ David W. Froesel, Jr.                          
| |                                                    
| | David W.
 Froesel, Jr.                             
| | Senior Vice
 President and
 Chief Financial Officer

---
.. ; . . i 

... ,._ 

.... .-

. ! ·-:\"• I 

. "" :. ..... 

. . .. :;_, : 

. . . 

':' -~:.:. ·:1 : .. 

··~ ' 4 ;'-:. I 

1. a.11. a. 1"1nda lot .... Id.bl• t.o 811bark upon the dnelopmnt. of • 

mw CCII 1-aed upoa t.be prinalplea ot IUl26/32 tor the .tollaw1ng reuoll81 

(A) ,.,...... "Alp!IM 
_, • ic• REF ID:A2435919 • 

rTOP SfbRff '"" 

"' ..• , 

v. 11. ~1T1B!I 

.. I
*Monday, September 13, 1999*

MOTION DOCKET

98-2016.

#### Maumee v. Weisner.

Lucas App. No. L-97-1409. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County. Upon consideration of the motion of *amicus curiae,*Ohio Attorney General Betty D. Montgomery, to participate in oral argument scheduled for September 21,1999,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to participate in oral argument be, and hereby is, granted, and the *amicus curiae*shall share the time allotted to appellant.

Resnick, J., not participating.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-1418

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Alicia Ramirez-Medina

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City

____________

 Submitted: November 15, 2016

Filed: November 18, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SHEPHERD, ARNOLD, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Alicia Ramirez-Medina appeals the sentence that the district court1

 imposed

after she pleaded guilty to a drug offense. Her counsel has moved to withdraw and

1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western

District of Missouri.
filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), asserting that the court

imposed a procedurally flawed and substantively unreasonable sentence. 

Ramirez-Medina pleaded guilty after entering into a written plea agreement

containing an appeal waiver. We conclude that the appeal waiver is enforceable. See

United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (de novo review of validity

and applicability of appeal waiver); United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 890-92 (8th

Cir. 2003) (en banc) (discussing enforcement of appeal waivers). Furthermore, we

have independently reviewed the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988),

and have found no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s

motion and dismiss this appeal.

______________________________

-2-
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2012

- NM

- 2 22

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
1 

f 

• • ADDRESS ONLY 

ID :A416~J06 • I. 

E COMMISSIONE~ OF PATENTS 

f~'WASHINGTON. D. C. / 

183 

Serial No. ~00.,212 

( 

~TODD/A DEPARTMENT OF. :COMMERCE 

' 

UNITED STATES PA.TENT OP'P'ICE 

WASHINGTON 

June E~gbteenth 194P·. 

1 ••• 

. . ... . ~ . I' 

W1111alli F. Fried.mans ''·· ' . : '· ..... 

Sir: 

Your' APPLICATION for a ,patent under the Act or 1883 

as·:'amend.~d, April 30, 1928, for'·an. IMPROVEMENT . . . - I . ..· ·!. ·~ IlJ 

¢WT,~~f+ .. ,:I>W'IU 

, 19 39 '· has been examined a;nd. ALLOWED. 

The Let·ters Pa t;en t wi1L be .f_orward.ed .. in due· course of 

business. 

Additional copies of spec1t1cat1Qns and drawings will 

be charged for at the following rates: Single copies, μncer~1-

~ fied, 10 cents each. The money should accompany the order. '· 

Respectfully, 

Eckar ll. Snodgraee 

& Cbarleil A. Rowe 

o/o The Chief ot the A1r Corpe. llunlt1ona Bl~. 

Washington• D. o. 

tfl.& 

Chief Clerk. 

roved for Release b NSA on 12-05-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40420

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BELFREY BROWN,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No.6:96-CR-22-13

- - - - - - - - - -

December 8, 1997

Before JONES, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Belfrey Brown appeals his conviction and sentence for

possession with intent to distribute and distribution of cocaine

base, aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1)

and 18 U.S.C. § 2. The district court did not clearly err in

adopting the factual findings of the PSR in determining the

amount of drugs attributable to Brown, since the PSR had

sufficient indicia of reliability, and Brown failed to

demonstrate that the PSR was unreliable. See United States v.
No. 97-40420

-2-

Jobe, 101 F.3d 1046, 1065 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v.

Valencia, 44 F.3d 269, 274 (5th Cir. 1995). For the same reason,

the district court did not err in declining to require laboratory

analysis of the substance determined to be “crack” to ensure that

it was not cocaine hydrochloride. Id. 

Nor was it clear error for the district court to apply

§ 2D1.1(b)(1) of the guidelines to increase Brown’s offense level

by two on the basis of the firearm found in Brown’s closet along

with drugs and ammunition. See United States v. Eastland, 989

F.2d 760, 770 (5th Cir. 1993). 

It is unnecessary to decide whether Solis should have been

subpoenaed for the sentencing hearing. Assuming, arguendo, that

Solis would have testified as Brown asserts, elimination of the

amount of drugs linked to Brown through Solis would not have

changed Brown’s base offense level, rendering any error harmless. 

See § 2D1.1(c)(2). 

AFFIRMED.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1



                        Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, No. 33-83714; Form S-3, No. 333-10939; and Form S-3, No. 333-20395)
and related prospectuses of Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc. of our report dated
February 7, 1997, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and
schedule of Gulf South Medical Supply, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form
10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996.



                                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP



Jackson, Mississippi
March 20, 1997