alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-6052

LORD BYRON SLATER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

L. CARTLEDGE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Charleston. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:15-cv-01486-JFA)

Submitted: May 23, 2017 Decided: May 26, 2017

Before KING, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lord Byron Slater, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Deputy Attorney General, 

William Edgar Salter, III, Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Lord Byron Slater seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the 

recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) 

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 

473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the 

dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of 

the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Slater has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to 

proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of vFinance, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leonard J.
Sokolow, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                  /s/ Leonard J. Sokolow
                                  -----------------------------
                                  Leonard J. Sokolow
                                  Chief Executive Officer
                                  April 2, 2007
|   | 1.     | The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | 2.     | Information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                         |

| Dated: May 14, 2010 |   | /s/ Michael J. Cushman                                           |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   | Michael J. Cushman                                               |
|                |   | President and Chief Executive Officer                            |
|                |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                    |
|                |   |                                                             |
| Dated: May 14, 2010 |   | /s/ Kevin R. Watson                                              |
|                |   | Kevin R. Watson                                                  |
|                |   | Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer           |
|                |   | (Principal Financial Officer & Principal Accounting Officer) |

----
**EXHIBIT 23**

 

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on FormS-3 (No. 333-48355/48355-01) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-52810, 33-77168, 33-89298, 33-80439, 333-20993, 333-42241, 333-61669, 333-80027, 333-72758, 333-96011 and 333-113114) of Tommy Hilfiger Corporation of our report datedMay 27, 2004 relating to the financial statements which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

New York, New York 

June 14, 2004
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before

publication in the New York Reports.

-----------------------------------------------------------------

No. 174 

George Newman, et al.,

 Appellants,

 v.

RCPI Landmark Properties, LLC, 

et al.,

 Respondents.

Annie E. Causey, for appellants.

Glenn A. Kaminska, for respondents.

Defense Association of New York, Inc., amicus curiae.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed,

with costs, and defendants' motion for summary judgment

dismissing the complaint denied. 

This is an ordinary negligence case. Questions

regarding proximate cause generally are for a trier of fact (see

- 1 -
- 2 - No. 174

Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308, 315 [1980], rearg

denied 52 NY2d 784 [1980]). Defendants' own submissions do not

establish as a matter of law that their alleged negligence was

not a proximate cause of the accident (see generally Zuckerman v

City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]). Viewed "'in the

light most favorable to [plaintiffs,] the non-moving part[ies]'" 

(Vega v Restani Constr. Corp., 18 NY3d 499, 503 [2012], quoting

Ortiz v Varsity Holdings, LLC, 18 NY3d 335, 339 [2011]), those

submissions leave open the possibility that some negligence on

defendants' part contributed to the injuries incurred by George

Newman (plaintiff) when he descended from the loading dock in

question, and that there is a causal link between that alleged

negligence and plaintiff's fall. 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Order reversed, with costs, and defendants' motion for summary

judgment dismissing the complaint denied, in a memorandum. Chief

Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein,

Fahey and Garcia concur.

Decided November 17, 2016

- 2 -
**UNITED STATES**

**SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549**

 

FORM 20-F/A

Amendment No. 1

 

 

 

**COMPAÑIA CERVECERIAS UNIDAS S.A.**

 (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

**UNITED BREWERIES COMPANY, INC.**

 (Translation of Registrant's name into English)

 

Republic of Chile

 (Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

Vitacura 2670, Twenty-Third Floor, Santiago, Chile

 (Address of principal executive offices)

 

Rosita Covarrubias,(562-427-3581), rosita@ccu.cl or rcovarr@ccu.cl

Vitacura 2670, Twenty-Third Floor, Santiago, Chile

(Name, Telephone, Email and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

_________________________________________

 

 

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000353191
<NAME> NORTH VALLEY BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          10,798
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,771
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                12,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     20,460
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          39,592
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            41,527
<LOANS>                                        170,375
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,509
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,406
<DEPOSITS>                                     235,210
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,542
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,956
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,698
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 266,406
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,851
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,159
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,010
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,172
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,172
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,838
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      140
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  71
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,202
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,383
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       2,383
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,983
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.61
<LOANS-NON>                                        439
<LOANS-PAST>                                        17
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,254
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      276
<RECOVERIES>                                        31
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,509
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of--

Wright Brothers Construction & Supplies 

Under Contract No. W919QA-10-C-0017 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ASBCA No. 60453 

Mr. Haji Mohammad Jan 

Managing Director 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. 

Army Chief Trial Attorney 

MAJ Christopher C. Cross, JA 

Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 18 November 2016 

. /~ MARK£ N. STEMPLE ~- Administrative Judge 

Acting Chairman 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60453, Appeal of Wright Brothers 

Construction & Supplies, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         345,894
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,092,869
<PP&E>                                         231,975
<DEPRECIATION>                                 161,384
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,294,470
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,720,433
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     47,045
<COMMON>                                        19,606
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,095,718)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,294,470
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,172,109
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             304,204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,471,233)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,471,233)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,471,233)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.75)


</TABLE>
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-15-0000956

02-MAR-2016

09:37 AM
FROM: 

l. Seourity Division orincura in r,enerul in the policy as outlined 

in Seo ion l 01• the auppl<-m<'nt to Fiacul Yc11.r •1948 Reara.roh und 

Develop.~ent pror,rwn.. Attention is invited to Pti.ragraph lD wherein it ~ 

states tllb.t researoh and Devclopnent Agencies will mantain oloec:ly 

·liaison ·with the ue1n1~ ar;c.'Ilcioe. lit ie recommcndod ttw.t a rH.ther definite 

pror,ram be adopted in order w keep AG1'' and AAF informed or our pro1?;resa 

and de+elopment and in order to secure any OOl'lnents ooncdrnin~ ohangee 

or lmpro't°uments whioh they desire. In oonneotion with this Sub-~ra···raph, 

' 1t is Ill.so believed advisable that a report from ASA be inoluded in the 

194& Jteaearch lllld Develop1 .ent program. It is l elieved t11at this report 

oan be written in. suoh a manner that the matorial oontained therein 

l11B.y be alaaa11'ied u.s Seoret a.nd it appeu.re to this di vision that the 

Army Ground Forcea, Army Air Foroos i'ind Si1';l'lal Corps. will be vitally 

interested in information 11.s to the progress of our researoh and development 

pror,ram. It is ueoessurily liaison und cun best be accomplished by this 

methoci. ~,~ 2. Attention is invit~d to lart1.t,raph 6E. Although the polioy. as 

indioat~d in thio parar,raph, places partioulkr l.Mphaeis upon roa~aroh 

I 

and dcvelopr..enta and although it is definitely etuted tno.t this poli~y will 

not proo'Ure dLvolopmcnt a~onoiea from the need for modii'ioationa 

of existing items. it is believed advisable at this time to consider 

-) 

the neceasity and dieirability ot 1•osaible modi.tl'iclitions oi some or our 

Crypta.nalytio devioes. Considering tho present supply status o£ 

l3lB2 equipmont, it is bl.lieved udviso.1°lt. to develop a repeater•• 

unit• 1.l'eci1iotilly designed m1e £or military use with the thouc;ht in 

midd that the proourcment of this oquipnt1nt in time of emergency will 

not o~ly be required but v11ll be by redesire. The 

roved for Release b NSA on 01-09-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 
REF ID:A67576 

·-

The modilicution of the SIGCUM should also be considered in order to 

improve its inheritcnoe security una its operational •~•P•!~t charat~ristios. 

The , evelopment oi' another type JODO should be cans: de red in order that 

the operational characteristics of the SIGABA may be improved. und from 

the st1a.ndpoint 01' oost rier unit. as well as space roquircments, the 

modii ic1:1.tion 0£ the present 14.AB tranami tter Distributor should be 

care!'ully considered.. The present TD is a modi1'ioation ofoormnercimal 

equipment lilld i'rom th" standpoint of military usuage it has sen,ral 

disadvan1.uges. Yihile tneae suge;estions are mod!.t'icationa o!' existing 

equipment. it is believed th&.t they are vit~lly necessary and thlit they 

m~ be considered in a scn1e ~s new itoms since the 131B2 &nd 

14.ADTD u.re commercial equipments and were not intended .tor .field use.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3623

___________

Foremost Insurance Group, *

 *

Appellee, *

 *

v. *

 *

Randy Gene Lloyd; Randall Clay * Appeal from the United States

Lloyd, a Minor, by and through his * District Court for the

Natural Guardian, Randy Gene Lloyd, * Eastern District of Arkansas. 

 *

Defendants, * [UNPUBLISHED]

 *

April Gardner, a Minor, by and through *

her Natural Guardian, Billy Gardner; *

Estate of Barbara Gardner, Deceased, *

 *

Appellants. *

___________

 Submitted: June 18, 1999

 Filed: July 1, 1999 

___________

Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit

Judges. 

___________

PER CURIAM.

April Gardner (through her guardian) and the Estate of Barbara Gardner appeal

from the entry of judgment for Foremost Insurance Group in its declaratory judgment
1The Honorable Elsijane T. Roy, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.

-2-

action against appellants and others. For reversal, appellants argue the district court1

erred in concluding that the suit involved a sufficient amount in controversy to support

federal diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.

Upon de novo review, see General Elec. Capital Corp. v. Grossman, 991 F.2d

1376, 1380 (8th Cir. 1993), we agree with the district court that it does not appear to

a legal certainty that less than the jurisdictional amount was in controversy, see

Missouri v. Western Sur. Co., 51 F.3d 170, 173 (8th Cir. 1995).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| 1.   | I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Insituform Technologies, Inc.; |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4.   | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5.   | The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ David A. Martin                                                                                       |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David A. MartinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)   |
~--

. . . 

'"·· 

r 

I 

REF ID:A68911 

SECRET 

~ti wad l'eYelop!"Cnt l"rr.Je=t. Index 

I/rt and i> trl.nct.or ot Int.olligc-lnce l!1 llla7 1947 

Gip\ 0-0..r\in/')1~9 ii.at. 4'19 

l. Jieterence f• •:!• t.o a -.\1nt twld 1.n \ha ~ DS:ri.aion, ·.~:-., on 14 iiay 1~'1, 

to dinuaa • pnpmed 1i&n i'l-9Jec\ JNd;ierint =~:r•t-n. .,., t. the pro,.,0111,.~ ~!". Pro~eet. 

!ildex. 

1. 9IM MrD ProJee' Index oontaina ~b.a !ollow1n;: W.. basic fields 1t't'h!'1 are 

•JPl:!.ca:..la \o \bl Aney- Ceccr'\;· i.venoyt 

A1 ..,. ?1 ~Urnc"> wi\h 118\ed a1Jhtielde of \lrJPtoi"'&p."l.y, -"ia~Uo 

DlneUon !'1ndinE1 a =ur.loat1C'M !nt.J"eup\. 

•• "°• ?6 SP.'\n!!,r~t:-~liJ!f!CJ!> 1f1\I\ u.~~ 8Ubt1eld ot o~T:1e•dona laC'G:t'!. ~,... . ! 

4.. tt woald be eseeadll\~~17 dtrftr.il\ t.o rtt. ou:r-~n'\ AJ"ll.Y ~c!1,..1 tq """ne:; pro-

.,:acte into t.118 !n•vork or th-. j?ropo•~d Projec.\ Indor. t:'or \hi• ?'ft&!"Ofa and bee.a''" 

of 'the hi eh'.1¥ elA•11 ri.•'1 na\ure of A"'J" ~curl. \y i\19ncy reaearch and -ieveloy..w~nt1 t\ la b911eftd d••in.ble t.tat a Hparat. ba•lfe fi•ld 1MI oa\abli•~•l tor pnj•f"te 

J1et0.iar te ttm •rar f4cm·1 t.y ll.pno7. 

'• Tt. i• n0v:"1Mr.t!ad \mts 

•• Jtro'9e't tndloe• 71.-02, "Cryp\oY.• .. i»b.t• and ?~. ·~:.·:n1eat1an• 

INttrl v• be deleted fl"O'li t.ha pro1ent. M!) l)i vt.ton ProJect. Index. 

"• Tb&\ a - ba,tc tteld enti t.laa atCr""loa• be 11111luded. 

-· ~. •• Thil\ .. for ••r"rtt.1 J"IMLGona no •:;bf1elda under "Cl')'Pt.olo··y" toe included 

Sa \M P140!ect Ttlldex. 

&, • li•ti ol 81:btJeld11 ader \he bae!c tielc! of cqptology "Ill• been pre;.are.d. ftd. U.t will ~ _.. aw!lable to tJ.10M ot.J"ioen :!fla{gna'•' by ;;oll'r Itf.Ti•inn \ct re-

•ln •wed.al 1.nter.\ton concemtng Ana.r ~:rit.T Apnq proJeete in ;.ha "11 ... twd" 

..... PJ'T. 

-sBCREr 

IUPU, o. 1¥.T'-S 

' . ' \ 

C.lo .. 01, !:.1KDA1 Corpe 

Cid.at, A:tt:y Secllrl\7 ~t~•neov 

roved for release b NSA on 01-16-2014 ursuantto E .0. 1352