alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14139-14140]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06130]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2015-N-0001]


Cardiovascular and Renal Drugs Advisory Committee; Amendment of 
Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an 
amendment to the notice of meeting of the Cardiovascular and Renal 
Drugs Advisory Committee. This meeting was

[[Page 14140]]

announced in the Federal Register of February 27, 2015 (80 FR 10700). 
The amendment is being made to reflect a change in the Agenda portion 
of the document. There are no other changes.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristina Toliver, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-9001, FAX: 301-847-8533, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#a5e6f7e1e4e6e5c3c1c48bcdcdd68bc2cad3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="753627313436351311145b1d1d065b121a03">[email protected]</span></a>, or FDA Advisory 
Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in the 
Washington, DC area). Please call the Information Line for up-to-date 
information on this meeting.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of February 27, 
2015, FDA announced that a meeting of the Cardiovascular and Renal 
Drugs Advisory Committee would be held on April 15, 2015. On page 
10700, in the first column, the Agenda portion of the document is 
changed to read as follows:
    The committee will discuss the new drug application (NDA) 204958, 
cangrelor injection, submitted by The Medicines Company, for the 
proposed indication of reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in 
patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing percutaneous 
coronary intervention (PCI)--(PCI refers to the opening of narrowed 
blood vessels supplying the heart muscle by a balloon inserted through 
an artery puncture with or without a stent) who have not received an 
oral P2Y12 inhibitor prior to the PCI procedure and in whom oral 
therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors is not feasible or desirable (P2Y12 is a 
protein involved in blood clotting. Inhibiting this protein is a key 
mechanism of action of cangrelor).
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to the advisory committees.

    Dated: March 12, 2015.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2015-06130 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT
32.1: CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K of SyntheMed, Inc.
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, the undersigned hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief,
that:





(1) such
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the
information contained in such Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of SyntheMed, Inc.











March
      27, 2009
              /s/ Robert P. HickeyName:
      Robert P. HickeyTitle:
      President, CEO and CFO
MEMO 9TING SLIP 1 NAME OR Tlll.E 

2 

a 

.. 

REMARKS 

~~~~A.,SAPPROVALS. CONCUIUtENCES. OR SIW' ACTIONS 

INITIALS 

DATE 

CIRCULATE 

CXIORDlllATION 

FILE 

INFORMATION 

NECESSARY ACTIDll 

NOTE AND 

RETURN 

SEE ME 

SIGNATURE 

eclassifi ed and approved for release by NSA on 11-17-2014 pursuant 

o E.O. 13526 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION !OP 3ECRE1 
REF ID:A58590 

TOP~ECR:2T StJ'?D._ 

8 0 - . • - t .~ lj' I> 7 0 e > • '1 r U. ~11 oa •a~ i..-.J1:.. ~Lo'l\IL ll 

MEMORANDUM FOR CONSULTANT 

20 February 1952 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL.86-36/50 USC 3605 

4. It is requested that you advise this office of your acti<bn in 

this matter. 

Enc: a/s 

-\S~~~) B. PULLING 

Colonel, USAF 

Acting Chief 

Office of Operations 

TOP SEOR~''l.. 8{JRDE
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
                         CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


Universal Standard Healthcare, Inc.
26500 Northwestern Highway, Suite 400
Southfield, Michigan 48076

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in Universal Standard
Healthcare Inc.'s Registration Statements on Form S-8 and on Form S-3 of our
report dated February 20, 1998, except for Note 7 which is as of March 12,
1998, relating to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
Universal Standard Healthcare, Inc. appearing in the Company's Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997.




                                                       BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


Troy, Michigan
March 27, 1998
II 

Calendar No. 271 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2169 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to extend the Land and Water 

Conservation Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Mr. TESTER (for himself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. HEINRICH, Mr. BENNET, Mr. 

LEAHY, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; 

which was read the first time 

OCTOBER 19, 2015 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to extend the Land 

and Water Conservation Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF LAND AND WATER CONSERVA4 TION FUND. 

5 Section 200302 of title 54, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2169 PCS

1 (1) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 

2 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘September 30, 2015’’ 

3 and inserting ‘‘December 11, 2015’’; and 

4 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘September 

5 30, 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘December 11, 2015’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 271 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2169 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to extend 

the Land and Water Conservation Fund. 

OCTOBER 19, 2015 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2010-0032

Directorate Identifier: 2009NM213AD

DC10-28-249, R1 --- 11/6/08

DC10-28-249 --- 8/7/07

MD11-28-135, R1 --- 11/6/08

MD11-28-135 --- 8/8/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. Sw.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221
DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.6


                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
PLD Capital Asset (U.S.) Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated March 30, 1999,
relating to the balance sheet of PLD Capital Asset (U.S.) Inc. as of December
31, 1998, and the related statements of operations, shareholder's equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended, which report appears in the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 of PLD Telekom Inc.

Our report dated March 30, 1999 contains an explanatory paragraph that states
that the Company's parent, PLD Telekom Inc. (PLD) does not presently have
sufficient funds on hand to meet its current debt obligations. PLD's failure to
make payment in full when required could result in a cross-default under and
acceleration of other debt obligations for which the Company is a guarantor.
These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as
a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.



                                                       KPMG LLP


New York, New York
March 30, 1999
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0327 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. THOMAS JAMES LUCERO,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including December 13, 2021, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 8 2021

11/08/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0327
Exhibit 32.2

Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp.

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

I, Robert Bowker, Chief Financial Officer of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, based upon a review of this Amendment No. 1 to the
Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and, except as corrected or supplemented in a subsequent report:



| |  |  | this report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Hungarian Telephone and
Cable Corp.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Robert BowkerRobert BowkerChief Financial OfficerMay 24, 2007
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R.

47.5.4.

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 05-51142

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

GERMAN GONZALEZ-ANGELES

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, San Antonio

5:05-CR-111-1

---------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate

sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to

remand case to district court for resentencing is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative motion to

extend time to file Appellee’s brief until 14 days after denial

of motion to vacate and remand is DENIED as unnecessary.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 1, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
```

[Federal Register: February 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 38)]
[Notices]               
[Page 9016]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26fe10-144]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Fifty-Fifth Meeting, RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental Conditions 
and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 135: Environmental Conditions and 
Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 17-19, 2010, starting at 9 a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Honeywell International Inc., 
Deer Valley Facilities, 21111 N. 19th Ave., Phoenix, AZ.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: (1) RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, 
NW., Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax 
(202) 833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a Special Committee 135: Environmental Conditions 
and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment meeting. The agenda will 
include:

October 28-30

 Opening Session (Welcome, Chairman's Opening Remarks, 
Introductions)
 Approval of Summary from the Fifty-Fourth Meeting.
 RTCA Paper No. 006-10/SC135-676
 Status and Review of Revision of AC
 Report from Section 16, 20, 21, & 26 Working Groups
 Review List of Change Proposals for DO-160G/ED-14G
 Status of User Guide Material
 Review Schedule for DO-160G
 New/Unfinished Business
 Establish Date for Next SC-135 Meeting
 Closing

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the ``FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT'' section. Members of the public 
may present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 19, 2010.
Francisco Estrada C.,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-3939 Filed 2-25-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Div. 

c 

0 

p 

y 

• 

MEMORANDUM FOR: 

c 

REF ID: A52207'& 

p 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

re 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

January 2, 193.4 

The Executive Officer. 

1. Reference is made to the attached papers covering ~r. 

Friedman's patent application. 

2. Apparently the only wav in which we could maintain secrecy 

for a longer period is to have the patent rights transferred to the 

Government. This would not provide secrecy for an indefinite period, 

but for only three years. It seems to me that this case merely serves 

to bring out the def acts in the present law and the necessity for the 

amendment thereof. The law should be so worded that patent rights on 

an invention of this nature could be obtained and secrecy preserved for 

an indefinite period. It is therefore proposed that either 

~· Legislation be obtained at this session of Congress to 

provide for patent rights and indefinite secrecy 

or 

]2. Th"l.t Mr. Friedman be allowed to file his claLn as an 

individual under the present law. 

(signed) s. B. Akin, 

Major, Signal Corps. 

Gan. Carr - I recommend that Mr. F. be allowed to file his claim. VD 

To W.P. & T. Div. 

C.Sig.O. 8.p)roves Mr~ Friedman's request for permission to file 

his claim under the patent laws. 

GLVD 

1/31/34 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
. ' 

REF ID:A522083-~,~7 /133 

. foi-JW ~oJ.u 

111 ~ Lf - I 1 _____ . 

-~~~~~~ ~~-:-u.~-=--· --~-~-~--- -••' --·•-•••••••----.. ---·--"----·-

-~ 

~ .. -~ -- ---- :tL.--~- -· -~-----

.~~~~~-...... -··~ 

~~~;Lc...cL,..~-c:;.....~~--.am ~-~·• 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11--19-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 05-51142

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff - Appellee

v.
GERMAN GONZALEZ-ANGELES Defendant - Appellant

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Western District of Texas, San Antonio

5:05-CR-111-1

---------------------
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to vacate
sentence is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s unopposed motion to
remand case to district court for resentencing is GRANTED.

IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative motion to

extend time to file Appellee’s brief until 14 days after denial
of motion to vacate and remand is DENIED as unnecessary. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D February 1, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
exv10w9






Exhibit 10.9




FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE

AMGEN SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN

AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 2009



The Amgen Supplemental Retirement Plan as Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009 (the
“Plan”) is hereby amended, effective April 11, 2011, as follows:



     The list of Participating and Subsidiaries and Affiliates of Amgen Inc. in Appendix A is
amended and restated to read as follows:


          1. Amgen USA Inc. — January 1, 2002


          2. BioVex, Inc. — April 11, 2011


          3. Immunex Corporation — January 1, 2003


          4. Immunex Manufacturing Corporation — January 1, 2003


          5. Immunex Rhode Island Corporation — January 1, 2003


          6. Amgen Worldwide Services, Inc. — January 1, 2004


          7. Amgen San Francisco, LLC — January 1, 2005


          8. Tularik Pharmaceutical Company — January 1, 2005


          9. Amgen Fremont Inc. — July 1, 2006


          10. Amgen Mountain View Inc. — January 1, 2007


To record this First Amendment to the Plan as set forth herein, the Company has caused its
authorized officer to execute this document this 7th day of April, 2011.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AMGEN INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Brian McNamee
 	 
	 	 	Brian McNamee 	 
	 	 	Senior Vice President, Human Resources
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 12, 2017.

________________

No. 3D17-979

Lower Tribunal No. 15-15572

________________

S.C.P., the Mother,

Petitioner,

vs.

Department of Children & Families, et al.,

Respondents.

A Writ of Certiorari to the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria

Sampedro-Iglesia, Judge.

Eugene F. Zenobi, Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Third

Region, and Kevin Coyle Colbert, Assistant Regional Counsel, for appellant.

Karla Perkins, for respondent Department of Children and Families; Laura J.

Lee (Sanford), for respondent Guardian ad Litem Program.

Before ROTHENBERG, C.J., and EMAS and LOGUE, JJ.

ON CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.
S.C.P., the Mother, petitions this Court for a writ of certiorari quashing the

trial court’s March 30, 2017 order that changed the goal of her case plan from

reunification to permanent guardianship. We grant the petition and quash the order.

The Mother’s children were adjudicated dependent on February 10, 2016. 

On January 4, 2017, the trial court accepted a case plan which set forth the primary

goal of reunification. On March 30, 2017, however, the trial court entered the

order under review. The order found that the Mother was in compliance with her

case plan but nevertheless, it changed the goal from reunification to permanent

guardianship. This change could prevent the Mother from eventually reuniting

with her children. 

The governing rules and statutes contemplate an evidentiary basis to support

a case plan amendment. See § 39.621, Fla. Stat. (2016); R.N. v. Dep’t of Children

& Families, 25 So. 3d 697, 700 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010) (“Rule 8.420 contemplates an

evidentiary basis to support a case plan amendment”). The Department properly

and commendably concedes that the trial court order lacks an adequate evidentiary

basis to support the case plan amendment, and the guardian ad litem also indicated

that it has no argument against granting the petition. Based upon our independent

review of the record and the Department’s confession of error, we grant the

petition and quash the order. 

Petition granted. 

2
#### Windross, Respondent, vs. McKillop and another, Appellants.

*February 10*

*March 1, 1898.*

*Appeal: Failure to apply for correction of manifest error: Costs.*

.An appeal from a judgment of foreclosure on the sole ground that it provides that the amount due thereon shall bear interest at a rate in excess of the minimum legal rate, in violation of sec. 8164, R. S. 1878, as amended by ch. 303, Laws of 1891, is without merit where the attention of the trial court was not called to the obvious mistake; and on reversal of the judgment, as required by Supreme •Court Rule XXXII, no costs will be allowed except that respondent will be required to pay the fees of the clerk of this court.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Oconto county: S. D. Hastings, Je., Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed in part; reversed in part.*

The plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendant *MeKillop.*Personal service •was had on all of the defendants. The defendant *MeKillop*suffered default, and the other defendants appeared but put in no answer. Due notice of application for judgment was given, and on December 21, 1896, judgment of foreclosure was entered. The note secured by the mortgage bore interest at eight per cent, per annum, and, by inadvertence, plaintiff’s attorney included a provision in the judgment that the amount due thereon should bear interest at that rate. Defendants *MeKillop*and the *Holt Lumber Oompa/ny*appeal from said judgment. ,

For the appellants the cause was submitted on the briefs of *Reinhart & Truddl.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Morrow da*Kynch, attorneys, and *Sheridan c& Kuans,*of counsel, and oral argument by,IF. *L. Evans.*

*526BáRdeen, J.

Sec. 3161, R. S. 1878, as amended by ch. 303, Laws of 1891, provides that the amount adjudged to be due in any judgment for the foreclosure of a mortgage shall draw interest at the rate provided to be paid, on the mortgage debt, *but shall not exceed the minimum legal rate of interest.*Sec. 1688, R. S. 1878, as amended by ch. 61, Laws of 1893, fixes the minimum rate of interest at six per cent. It was therefore error for the plaintiff to 'include any greater rate of interest in the judgment than six per cent. It was error, however, which the trial court would have corrected on mere suggestion, had its attention been called to it, and •would thus have saved all parties the expense of an appeal to this court. The failure to do so leaves the appeal without merit. Rule XXXII of this court, however, requires us to reverse the judgment.

*By the*Court.— That portion of the judgment requiring eight per cent, interest on the amount found due is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the circuit court with directions to so modify the judgment as to bear interest at the legal rate. No costs will be allowed except that respondent must pay the fees of the clerk of this court. The remainder of the judgment is affirmed.