alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUMBER 13 - 1 6 - 00 338 - CV 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ TIMOTHY RAY GRANT , A ppellant ,
v. ANDREA ELEASE MYERS , A ppellee
.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Timothy Ray Grant , appealed a judgment entered by the 329th District Court of Wharton County, Texas. On June 27, 2016, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the notice of appe al failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e) and 25.1(d)(4)

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 9.5(e) , 25.1(d)(4) . The Clerk directed appellant to file an amended notice of appeal with the district clerk's office within2

30 days from the date of th at notice. On August 8, 2016, the Clerk notified appellant that the defect had not been corrected and warned appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the defect w as not cured within ten days. Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Cler k or corrected the defect. On July 28, 2016 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant , in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $ 20 5.00 filing fee was paid. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(c)

. Appellant has not responded to the notice from the Clerk or paid the $ 20 5.00 filing fee. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 5, 12.1(b). The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s failure to
correct the defect or pay the filing fee , is of the opin ion that the appeal should be dismissed. See id. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed th is 2 nd day of September, 20 1 6

.
REF ID:A62862 

.Mr. E. RoaG Anderson 

.Anderson-Nichols Compiny 

150 Causeway Street 

J$os.ton 14, llhssachusettJf 

At-tention: Mr. Leo Rosen 

Ml•. Robert Wil Hams 

Dear 81.rat 

J.9 April 1955 

Jt¥ husband bide m a.cknovledge :ror hia hie gi.-atef'Ul 

&pprec1at1on or the hand.eomo :tl<n"lll gitt hP. ha.a received. 

from the three ~ you. lie a.l8o vi.shes to acknowledge tha 

letters and bids me to say that be is gm.tetu.l '.tor your 

1nte1:e.st in the winning or the Fo.l,ger Shakesx;eare .Library 

&'Ward. 

Be u progresid.ng sa.tiaf'actorily and il'ldeed hBa 

eh.own marked improve.roe11t ill the last tvo dlqlh The medical 

eomrmnd, howver, rcma!nrJ t.he .._, appraxilmtely tour weeks 

1n the hospit&l aJJd. &n ad.d.itional month'• reat at bQ.me. 

I •hould 1.1.ke to add ~ ovn appreciation f'or ycnr 

gift an1 letters. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a · 

-- -----

k 

·~ ' 

}1 

'~ 

I l 

I \\ 

·A "'-

I, ,. ' [ 

\ 

\ 

\
1 ... S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 47. 4. 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 28 2- CV I N RE J . THO M AS KN I GH T, M . D. , RE L ATO RS J . T H O M A S K N IG H T , M .D ., P .A ., A N D M ED I C A L I M A G I N G O F D A LLA S , LLP

----- ----- OR I GI NALP R OCE E DI NG

----- ----- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- W e h aveco ns i der ed “Re l at or s’ A gr ee d M ot i on F orD i sm i ss al O fPet i t i on ForW r i tO fM and am us . ” I ti s t he cou rt ’ s opi ni on t hatt he m oti on s houl d be g r a n t e d ; t h e r e f o r e , w e d is m is s t h is o r ig in a l p r o c e e d in g . H a v in g d is m is s e d t h is o ri g i n a l p roc e e d i n g , “R e l a to rs’ M o ti o n F o r Em e rge n c yR e l i e f” i s d e n i e d as m o o t. C os t s oft hi s or i gi nal pr oce edi ng sh al l be pa i d byt he part y i ncu r r i ng t he s a m e , fo r w h i c h l e t e x e c u ti o n i s s u e .

P E R CU R I AM P A N E LA : M C C O Y , H O L M A N , a n d G A R D N E R , J J .DEL I VERE D: J ul y 31, 2008
REF ID:A67558 

WAR DEPARTMENT • 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 8 

WASHINGTON 

llm>l&IDUll RI CIPHER DEVICE 11-138. 

' 

It is posalble to provide a dapllcate set. or separator 

bu-a "for chamlel.8 ia the rear or reverse aide of the base. eo that 

oae device could be uaecl tor t.wo auccuaiTe key set-upaa the 

curz:ent and the OD& precedhag. In this way, aeseagea arr1Ting 

after a chaage 1D kq could be deciphered by revereiDg the c1eYS.ce. 

I. 12-hour change or a 6--bour change 1n set-lip could be praotiaable. 

The support. frame could be hinged at t.he aides and the 

rabber f'eet aoved t.o the bottom edge. 

lla7 s. 1936. 

~~-·· clok. 

"a·~~~ 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information (prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada) extracted from the
accounting records of Mitel Corporation and included in the Consolidated
Statements of Income for the Nine Months Ended December 27, 1996 and the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 27, 1996 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-28-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.00000
<CASH>                                           9,815
<SECURITIES>                                   112,533
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,442
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,813
<INVENTORY>                                     86,925
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,089
<PP&E>                                         409,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                 233,145
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 551,804
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          133,697
<BONDS>                                         47,531
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     37,180
<COMMON>                                       153,018
<OTHER-SE>                                     156,954
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   551,804
<SALES>                                        500,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               500,371
<CGS>                                          243,984
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  243,984
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               211,368
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,728
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,700
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,040
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,660
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,660
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.34<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33<F2>
<FN>
<F1>EPS-Primary is EPS-Basic under Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles.
<F2>EPS-Diluted is EPS-Fully Diluted under Canadian generally accepted 
accounting principles.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
J' • WAR DEPARTMENT 

WAR DEPARTMENT GENERAL STAFF 

MILITARY INTEJ.LIGJ!NCE DIVISION, G-Z 

WASHINGTON ZS, D. C. 

MEMORANDUM FOR TEE CHIEF,, ARMY SECURITY AGENCY a 

SUBJECT: Installation of Secure Teletypewriter Facilities Between 

the Military Intelligence Division and the Depar-tment ot 

State. 

l. Attention is invited to the inclosed copy of memora.r.idum. 

.from the Assistant Chief' of Staf'f' /1 G-2 to the Chief Signal D.f.'i'icer /1 I subject as above. . ' 

~ 

2. It is desired that Army Security Agency furnish the necessary cryptographic material tor the operation of a SIGTO? circuit 

between the terminals involved,, and assist the Chief Signal Officer 

as necessary in the installation of suoh circuit. 

l Incl 

Cpymemo frm G-2 

to CSO 1~£~~~ Deputy A.a. ot s •• Q-S 

.· 

eclassified and approved for release 

y NSA on 04-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 

REST RIOTED
. . . 1 ' ~ ~A86-B JJ..J •t'JS 

Div. · l ~ Room '~ ;'~-, REF ID: ~7 B0-4 .-~ , \ I ' j Addres• 0 nlv "·---i>EPARTM ENT OF COMMERCE \ •. ,... 

"The~:'l!!:~~~cf>~rl:'·~ents, .a. UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE ·• 

8 

Paper No. 

All communlc..'ltlnns res[ICClinl? this 

application should give the serial number, 

d:a le of filing, and nan1c of lhc 11ppllcant and nol any olliclal b,- name J ,.. . .., ,,. WASHINGTON une 7 t 193 7 

Please li.nd below. a communication from the EXAJ.lllNER in 

charge of this ap~l-ication. Q ~ 

••• 11-~s . . ~Commiuioncl" of PatUIU, Applicant:\. illiem F. Friedman 

Robert v, Laughlin &. 

Cbarles A. Rowe, 

c/o Chief of the ~1r 

Mun1t 1-ons Bldg. , 

Washington, n.c. 

Ser. No. 

Filed 

For 

et al 

36 ,868 

Aug. 19, 1935 

Electrical Lwitching 

r:eehanism 

I/ 

In response to amendment of February l, 1937 i ·dl 1 7 ~j \ 

Reference added: 

Boardman 1,600,753 Sept. 21, 1926 200-92uxrA3 

This case now c_ontains claims 6 throuc-h 23. 

Claims 6, 7, 10, 11, 12, 16, 17, 19 and 23 are rejected 

as uisdescr1pt1 ve in sett inc forth the re la ti vely r1.ovable bodies 

or contact drum and contact arm as "independently" movable. Both 

are driven by the sal'!le motor end operate at the sar.ie time, hence 

are .a:iot move:i independently. 

Claim 7 1s further rejecteri as indefinite in the last 

line" There is no antecedent for "eearinf'"• 

Claims 8 and 9, depending from claim 7, are rejected.·.·.:"·· 

therewith. 

Claims 10, 12, 13, 14 and 16 are rejected as inaccurate 

in eett,.1ng forth means "to vary tt:e c 1rcu1t connections in a 

rendom order" (claims 10 ·end 16) ~ "to effect random permute- ' 

tions Of the c 1rcu1 t connect 1ons" (claim 12) ; "for varying the 

rele t1on between said contacts in a random order" ( cle 1cs 13 end 

141. Contact is n~de end broken 1n e def'ini te order or sequence 

and always 1n the same order. The variation is in the epeeds 

of the movable elements and not 1n the sequence. 

Claim 13 is further rejected as not pate~tably dis- . 

tingu1sh1ng from the structure of Boardman. supra. Boardraan 

shows ~n adjustable friction dr1ve for a control drum. 

Claim 15 is rejected as 1ndetin1te in lines 3 end 4, 

"heving its contact elenents electrically connected in irregular 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-05-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a •} I • 
fl ---- /'' .. REF ID :A67804 36,~----2 

order". ( ) To whBt-ire the contact elements c~nnected? 

Claim 15 1e further rejected es functional. There is 

no structure ~rovidinG for the periodic operation set forth in 

the last line. 

Claim 18 is rejected as fully met by Boardman, supra. 

Claims 19 and 20 are rejected as readine: on the s~ructure of Boardman, Fig. 4. The reference shows two contact elements driven by friction drives end independently variable. 

21 and 22 ere rejected as directly readable on either 

Boardman,· supra, or ~avoy or Jurhomme et al both of record. 

Examiner
| (1)   | the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ David A. Martin                                                                           |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | David A. MartinSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
<PAGE>

                                    EXHIBIT 4

                            FORM CERTIFICATIONS UNDER
                          SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of ID Biomedical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Anthony F. Holler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/S/  ANTHONY F. HOLLER


Name: Anthony F. Holler
Title: Chief Executive Officer


May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ID Biomedical and will be retained by ID Biomedical and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>

                            FORM CERTIFICATIONS UNDER
                          SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY
                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the annual report of ID Biomedical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard Bear, Vice President of Finance and Administration of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/S/  RICHARD BEAR


Name:  Richard Bear
Title: Vice President of Finance and Administration


May 14, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to ID Biomedical and will be retained by ID Biomedical and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
MISCELLANEOUS DOCKET

#### In re Report of the Commission on Continuing Legal Education. Edward Donald Hayman (# 0001128), Respondent.

1999 TERM

ENTRY

This matter originated in this court on the filing of a report by the Commission on Continuing Legal Education (the “commission”) pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(A)(l)(b) and (A)(2)(d). The commission recommended the imposition of sanctions against certain attorneys, including the above-named respondent, for failure to comply with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. X, Attorney Continuing Legal Education, for the 1996-1997 reporting period.

On July 30, 1999, this court adopted the recommendation of the commission, imposed a sanction fee upon the respondent and suspended the respondent from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(6)(B)(3),and Gov.Bar R. X(5)(A)(4). The court further ordered that respondent shall not be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio until respondent complies with the requirements for reinstatement set forth in Gov.Bar R. X(7).

On August 23, 1999, the commission filed a recommendation pursuant to Gov.Bar R. X(7)(B)(2), finding that the respondent has paid all fees assessed for noncompliance, has made up all deficiencies and is now in full compliance with all requirements of Gov.Bar R. X, and recommending that the respondent be reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio. On August 23, 1999, the commission certified that respondent had completed the credit hours of continuing legal education required during his suspension by this court’s order of suspension. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the recommendation of the commission is adopted and respondent, Edward Donald Hayman, is hereby reinstated to the practice of law.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                      9
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                               5,373
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               5,574
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    10,929
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                         0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          1,569
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              15,016
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                14,890
<LOANS>                                             85,342
<ALLOWANCE>                                            889
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     129,651
<DEPOSITS>                                         114,124
<SHORT-TERM>                                             0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                    731
<LONG-TERM>                                          5,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 6
<OTHER-SE>                                           8,996
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                     129,651
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      7,805
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                      976
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                       565
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     9,346
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   3,780
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     390
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                5,176
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                           60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                       0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                      4,912
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        963
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                             963
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           573
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         1.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                        4.20
<LOANS-NON>                                            284
<LOANS-PAST>                                           284
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                         0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      1,871
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                       817
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                           53
<RECOVERIES>                                            65
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                      889
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                                601


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           1,920,927
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,328,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,193,576
<INVENTORY>                                      1,498,119
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                34,434,138
<PP&E>                                          26,188,243
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,358,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  59,264,907
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,849,324
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        21,997,067
<OTHER-SE>                                        (730,257)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    59,264,907
<SALES>                                         56,749,702
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                56,749,702
<CGS>                                           37,755,604
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   46,850,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 647,772
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (748,165)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (289,069)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (450,096)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.03)




</TABLE>
<PAGE>
 
                                                                 EXHIBIT 11.(B)

                GREEN TREE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

                 COMPUTATION OF FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                        Year ended December 31
                                         ----------------------------------------------
                                                1996            1995          1994
                                         ----------------   -------------  ------------
<S>                                          <C>             <C>           <C>   
Net earnings                                 $200,774,000    $253,969,000  $181,279,000
                                          ===============   =============  ============

Weighted average number of common 
and common equivalent shares 
outstanding:
  Weighted average common shares
    outstanding                               136,995,701     136,644,397   134,941,996
  Dilutive effect of stock options after
    application of treasury-stock method
    assuming full dilution                      3,726,183       3,465,972     3,905,550
                                         ----------------   -------------  ------------
                                              140,721,884     140,110,369   138,847,546
                                         ----------------   -------------  ------------

 Earnings per share:                                $1.43           $1.81         $1.31
                                                    =====           =====         =====
</TABLE>