alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.. __ p,par1ment ot Mathematics 

• MADN...A - REF ID:A66562-

UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY 

WEST POINT, NEW YORK 

Dr. William F. Friedman 

3601 Nebraska Avenue 

Washington 25, D.C. 

Dear Dr. Fri adman: 

29 March 1952 

Thank you very much tor your letter ot 26 February, replying. to my que:ry 

as to choice between the tv.t> lecture plans. I thoroughly agree that the best 

plan is to give the lecture to halves of the class on tm successive morn.:Lngs. 

Therefore, we are now completing our arrangemmts to schedule the lectures tor 

the .mrni:ags of 28 and 29 May. 

I hope you will plrdon my delq in sending this reply. The reason is 

that we ran into a conflict ot schedules in trying to arrange two tU'ty-minute 

periods tor each lecture. This finally proved impossible, so tl:lat we are 

forced to limit the lecture to eighty minutes each morning. I regret this very 

much, but t1'0JD. your letter of 13 l!'ebrmry I understand that you are able to 

tailor the lecture to tit an eighty minute period. AlJ:1 brief recess you may 

desire during the eighty minutes can be arranged easily. 

A formal invitation has been sent to General Canine, and I am inclosing 

a copy tor your information. 

Your otter to give an extra non-classified talk on aspects of' cryptograplJ1' 

in the :tamous Be.con-vs-Shakespeare cont:roverSY' is highly appreciated. I am sure 

that this will arouse great interest among the otticers and ladies here and am 

delighted with the opportunity to ofter such an event. Before making definite 

plans we wish to discuss it with the Inglish Department, and in doing so we 

should like to show than a suggested announcanent to be published by the Department of 148.thenatics twJ or three days in advance of tl:le talk. We have dratted 

such an announcement, but are uncertain as 1x> whether all of the 'R>rding 1n it 

is pe~ssible tram tlle standpoint ot security regulations. Therefore, 1 am 

inclosing a copy tor your approval. I slBll appreciate it ve1'7 much it you 'Will 

edit the announcement on g:munds of accuracy as well as security, and return it 

in a to rm which we may f'eel tree 1x> use. 

As soon as General Irving's letter to General Canine bas been ta-vorabl1' 

acted upon, we shall write to inquire further about your wishes regarding certain details of :vour visit here. 

Very sincerely, 

2 Inola: 

1 Oy ot ltr to Gen.Canine 

2 Draft.,IJ.1.....a..U.W..u,.u,i~~U&.a..____,____,,..,..,,....,...-~.,........ ............... ....,...#.~~~::=..i~-=::.=~
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       5
<LEGEND>        THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
                INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM 10Q DATED
                MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
                ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
                STATEMENTS
<MULTIPLIER>    1,000
                
<S>             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                           26,320
<SECURITIES>                    131,206
<RECEIVABLES>                    29,407
<ALLOWANCES>                          0
<INVENTORY>                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                215,735
<PP&E>                           70,691
<DEPRECIATION>                   55,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  389,599
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>            64,763
<BONDS>                               0
<COMMON>                            945
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                 0
<PREFERRED>                           0
<OTHER-SE>                      299,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    389,599
<SALES>                          39,293
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                 39,293
<CGS>                            31,321
<TOTAL-COSTS>                    31,321
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  10,960
<INCOME-TAX>                      4,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>               6,610
<DISCONTINUED>                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                       0
<CHANGES>                             0
<NET-INCOME>                      6,610
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       .71
<EPS-DILUTED>                       .70
        


</TABLE>
". ._ ......... 

c 

0 

p 

y 

REF ID:A1050S9 

ROUTING and WORI SHEET 

-~ 

·--~ 

1 ·ro be used under prov 11:1iona 'tf.f __ ~Pa!l:..-rl4I .:.a.~bi';~;Offiae Regulations, OCSigO, !934) 

. ____ . { t~e ! -'-Oi ~ 8'0. -~iit1•".":"<f•r·-~·1 ._-~,.,.().If ~.I.lo ....:J.~q "'to RnE..tO~ .. -l.!:.L:w fi·4"'rr .,,,. n'I'' .·i 

Number 

Each From: To: 

Action 

1 R&D WP&T 

2 WP&T 

' . 

4 Capt. 

Mille B&D 

Initials 

Memorandum and 

• <1T • .... -::Date 

----·. ··-····--------

For your information and comments. 

L.H.J. 6-6-36 

For comment 

1. I do not teel qualified to go further into operating 

etaUs, and am not in a position to of£er experimental data 

ther than thoae in the literature and in certain reports ot 

e Signal Corps Laboratories. 

H.L.P.K. 

6-11-.36 

2. By- the t111.e the patent aan be prepared and issued, 

dvances in the art 118.Y' obviate the difficulties referred to. 

this oonneotion,, I understand that il'et&t advances have 

een made in the art in the past seYeral years, eapecially' 11-36 

the Western EJ.eotric and Bell Telephone Laboratories .. 

3. There!'o::re, despite questions re1arding praoticability £ the proposed s,ysteia and admitted ditficulties inherent 

erein, it is reoo1111ended that patent application be tiled W.F.F. 

s eoou as praoticable. 

I have discussed this matter with a qualified engineer 

who gave an opinion that magnetization can be added algebraically on a steel tape. Contingent upon the correctness 6-20-30 

of this, I believe the system is theoretically sound and 

practically possible. 

Recom.~end that patent application be filed. H.G.M. 

Sheet 'fo. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuantto E.O __ . 1_352a .. ------ ------- ~-----~-~ ====:::::::===::::=:::========::::::=::=======::::::===::::::=..i----io.1
1

The Honorable Thomas M. Shanahan, United States District Judge for the

District of Nebraska.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 04-3869

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Nebraska.

Perdis Cotton, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: January 12, 2006

Filed: January 19, 2006 

___________

Before MELLOY, FAGG, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Perdis Cotton appeals the 150-month sentence the district court1

 imposed after

granting the government’s Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion to reduce

Cotton’s sentence for his post-sentencing substantial assistance. His counsel has

moved to withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),

arguing that the reduction should have been even greater. Counsel’s argument is

unavailing. See United States v. Coppedge, 135 F.3d 598, 599 (8th Cir. 1998) (per

curiam) (extent of Rule 35(b) reduction is unreviewable); cf. United States v.
-2-

Williams, 324 F.3d 1049, 1049-50 (8th Cir. 2003) (per curiam) (refusal to depart

further under U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 is not reviewable unless defendant makes “substantial

showing” that court’s decision was based on unconstitutional motive).

Having reviewed the resentencing record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75,

80 (1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant defense counsel’s

motion to withdraw, and we affirm. 

______________________________
98-2549.

#### State ex rel. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Commrs. v. Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

In Mandamus. On answer of intervening respondent Envirosafe Services of Ohio, Inc. and on motion to dismiss. This cause originated in the court upon the filing of a complaint in mandamus. Upon the court’s determination pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5),

IT IS ORDERED by the court that an alternative writ is hereby GRANTED and that the following schedule be set for the presentation of evidence and the filing of briefs:

The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within twenty days of this entry. Respondent Ohio Environmental Protection Agency shall file an unredacted copy of the ESOI 1997 Grab and Hold Tracker under seal with its evidence. Relator shall file its merit brief within twenty days of the filing of the evidence; respondents shall file their merit briefs within twenty days of the filing of relator’s merit brief; and relator shall file any reply brief within five days after the last of respondents’ merit briefs is filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that relator’s claims are DISMISSED as to those portions of the ESOI 1997 Grab and Hold Tracker that it has now received.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents and would dismiss the cause.
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

JAN 11 2002

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

LADONNA KAY PAYNE,

Petitioner-Appellant, No. 01-7089

v. (D. C. No. 00-CV-628-S)

JAMES SAFFLE, Warden; HOWARD

RAY, Deputy Warden,

(E.D. Okla.)

Respondents-Appellees.

 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR and McKAY, Circuit Judges, and BRORBY, Senior Circuit

Judge.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this panel has

determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the

determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). 

The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This is a pro se § 2254 prisoner appeal. The underlying petition for habeas

corpus was dismissed by the trial court as untimely. The district court denied
-2-

Appellant’s motion for a certificate of appealability. This motion has been

renewed to this court.

Ms. Payne’s petition was filed beyond the one-year statute of limitations

imposed by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, codified

at 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Ms. Payne argues that the limitations period should be

equitably tolled because she relied on her attorney to meet filing deadlines. 

Additionally, Ms. Payne asserts that tolling of the AEDPA limitations period is

appropriate since she is actually innocent of the charge of Murder in the First

Degree because someone else actually committed the crime. The trial court held

that equitable tolling is not justified by “[m]ere attorney negligence.” Opinion at

3 (quoting Steed v. Head, 219 F.3d 1298, 1300 (11th Cir. 2000); see also Marsh v.

Soares, 223 F.3d 1217, 1220-21 (10th Cir. 2000). The trial court also held that

since Ms. Payne has not accompanied her habeas petition with new reliable

evidence of her innocence, circumstances did not warrant a tolling of the statute. 

We can add nothing to the district court’s well-reasoned opinion.

Nothing in the facts, the record on appeal, or Appellant’s brief raises an

issue which meets our standards for the grant of a certificate of appealability. See

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 474 (2000). She has not made a substantial

showing of a denial of a federal right nor has she raised any arguments which

require further proceedings or that are debatable among jurists of reason. See id.
-3-

We DENY Ms. Payne’s request for a certificate of appealability and

DISMISS the appeal. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as

moot.

Entered for the Court

Monroe G. McKay

Circuit Judge
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION REQUIRED BY****SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Overland Storage, Inc. (the  “Company”) that, to his knowledge, the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in such report.

 

 
| By:                      | /s/ Christopher Calisi          |   |   |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                     | Christopher Calisi              |   |
|                     | President and Chief             |   |
|                     | Executive Officer               |   |
|                     | (Principal Executive Officer)   |   |
|                     |                            |
| Date: September 26, 2003 |                            |
|                     |                            |
|                     |                            |
| By:                      | /s/ Vernon A. LoForti           |   |   |
|                     | Vernon A. LoForti               |   |
|                     | Vice President, Chief Financial |   |
|                     | Officer and Secretary           |   |
|                     | (Principal Financial Officer)   |   |
|                     |                            |   |
| Date: September 26, 2003 |                            |

 

----
### Gormas. Michael (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: Subject: Schlemmer, Kevin (OSn Wednesday, March 26,2014 1:22 PM Gormas, Michael (OSn FW:EASGreat Bend, KS-Change Service Pattern

From: Great Bend Airport [mailto:greatbendairport@ruraltel.netl sent: Wednesday, March 19, 20149:45 AM To: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Cc: Tim Sieber; hdpart@greatbend.com; Adams, Kevin (OST) Subject: EASGreat Bend, KS-Change Service Pattern RE: Docket DOT-OST-1998-3496 SeaPort Change Request, 3/18/14 Kevin, The City of Great' Bend supports the March 18 change requested bySeaPort to improve the service pattern, and hereby' requests your approval. Since Great Lakesisterminating flights one month prior to the SeaPort arrival, your earliest attention to this request will allo,Wusto commence these improved operations at the outset of service. We would also like to thank DOTfor their decision to select SeaPort for our city. We plan to partner with SeaPort on a basisthat will allow passenger growth and economic growth, and use EASfunding in amore productive manner. Thank You, Martin Miller, Airport Manager City of Great Bend, Kansas

1
--;- - - ·<.:'. --~~~ - ~:·:mo~- .• ST--NCl.M 'F°•'.;J ''f<! .~()- ~ I • " .·~ ' ·"''<•':. . ' • ~.- 1~ 

: Olhce MemOra~:!~b~~"iT~'it~~s GOVERNMENT • :Jj II ~ 

TO , ~./~a+t,/ DATB• //-.S"-JPROM •~cf'~ 

SUBJECT: 

_/~; ~~r-~.d. 

)/ ?P7N4~ 

;?· 

l!\pproved for Release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
EXHIBIT 32(B)
                                                                   -------------


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the  quarter  ending  December  31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  the  Chief  Financial  Officer  ("CFO")  of  the  Company,  hereby
certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



         Date:  February 10, 2004   By:  /s/ Robert I. Lieberman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Robert I. Lieberman
                                           Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934,  except to the  extent  that the  small  business  issuer  specifically
incorporates it by reference.
EPA-Approved Washington SDWA §1422 

Underground Injection Control Program 

Statutes and Regulations for 

Well Classes I, II, III, IV, and V 

January 2014 
Table of Contents 

I. Revised Code of Washington Sections 90.48.010-90.48.906, 

Water Pollution Control (February 3, 2006) 

II. Revised Code of Washington Section 43.21A.445, Departments 

authorized to participate in and administer federal Safe Drinking 

Water Act - Agreements with other departments (February 3, 

2006) 

III. Washington Administrative Code Sections 173-218-010 - 173-

218-130, Underground Injection Control Program (June 19, 

2008) 

IV. Washington Administrative Code Sections 344-12-001 - 344-

12-295, Oil and Gas Conservation Committee, General Rules 

(June 29, 1988) 

V. Washington Administrative Code Sections 173-160-010- 173-

160-990, Minimum Standards for Construction and 

Maintenance of Wells (December 19, 2008)
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2418

_____________________________

HARVEY VIRGIL,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from a Florida Department of Health, Board of 

Nursing, Final Order.

Joe R. Baker, Jr., Executive Director.

 

June 21, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Harvey Virgil, pro se, Appellant.

Louise Wilhite-St. Laurent, Christine E. Lamia, and Sarah Young 

Hodges, Department of Health, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Q 

U.S. Department GENERAL COUNSEL 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Of Transportation ^ ^ ,«-«-. « Washington, DC 20590 

September 30,2010 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

' t 3 

O 

MEMORANDUM FOR DOCKET NUMBER DOT.OST-2010-0140 > 

^^__ _ Q 

From:,,^-- Samuel Podberesky ,^^ZZZ^^=-^' ivj c5 

Assistant-OeHeral Counselor Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings 

Re: Meeting ^rith representatives of consumer and travel groups 

On September 20, 2010, DOT officials, including Secretary Ray LaHood, met with 

representatives of consumer and travel groups at 2 pm at the Department's Washington, 

D.C. headquarters. During this meeting, the groups congratulated Secretary LaHood and 

the Department on the pending notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) which would 

strengthen the rights of air travelers in the event of oversales, flight cancellations and long 

delays, and ensure that passengers have accurate and adequate information to make 

informed decisions when selecting flights. 

The following people attended the meeting: 

Sally Greenberg, Director, National Consumer League 

Ray LaHood, Secretary, DOT 

Charles Leocha, Director, Consumer Travel Alliance 

Anjum Malik, Consumer (Managing Director, Alhambra Chamber of Commerce) 

Karoline Mayr, Director, Global Travel Procurement, Deltek, Inc. 

Kevin Mitchell, Chairman, Business Travel Coalition 

Samuel Podberesky, Ass't Gen. Counsel for Aviation Enforcement & Proceedings, DOT 

Jill Zuckman, Director of Public Affairs, DOT 

In addition to congratulating the Department, the consumer and travel groups urged the 

Department to take action to require airlines to disclose all ancillary fees through every 

ticketing channel in which airlines sell their seats. The groups stressed the importance of 

consumers having prompt and full access to ancillary fees thereby ensuring that the total 

cost of air travel is fiilly disclosed. 

The travel and consumer groups indicated their plans to file formal comments with the 

DOT expressing their views before the close of the comment period. The Secretary and 

other DOT representatives encouraged them to do so.
EXHIBIT 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors and Stockholders of JumboSports Inc.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements of
JumboSports Inc., as of January 30, 1998 and for the years ended January 31,
1997 and January 30, 1998, which consolidated financial statements are included
by reference into this report, we have also audited the financial statement
schedule listed in Item 99 herein.

In our opinion, this financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to this basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents,
fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be included
therein.



COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.
Tampa, Florida
April 24, 1998
November 17, 2016

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JEROME FISHER PLEASANT, Appellant

NO. 14-15-00971-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcripts of the record of the court below, and 

having inspected the record, the Court holds there was no error in the judgment 

requiring reversal, but there was error in the judgment as entered, which is capable 

of reformation by this Court. Therefore, the judgment is REFORMED, to reflect a 

conviction for Aggravated Assault on a Public Servant.

The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED as REFORMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 18

- 00070

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF G.C. , a Child From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017PA00971 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: May 30, 2018
AFFIRMED This is an appeal from the trial court’s Order of Termination in which the trial court terminated Appellant’s parental rights. Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief and motion to withdraw, concluding the appeal is without merit

. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R. , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (mem. op.) (applying Anders
pro cedure in appeal from termination of parental rights) . Counsel provided Appellant with a copy of the brief. Appellant was informed of his right to review the record and advised of his right to file a pro se brief. The State waived its right to file an appe llee’s brief unless Appellant filed a pro se brief. Appellant has not requested the record or filed a brief.04

- 18

- 00070

- CV

- 2

- After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

– 86 (Tex . App.

— San Antonio 1997, no writ). The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw because counsel does not assert any ground for withdrawal other than his conclusion that the appeal is frivolous

. See In the Interest of P. M. , 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 (Tex. 2016). Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice