alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-80,324-02

EX PARTE OSCAR DAVID PARDO, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. NO. 2011-CR-5260-W2 IN THE 379 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam. YEARY, J., not participating.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child

and sentenced to forty years’ imprisonment. The Fourth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. 

Pardo v. State, No. 04-13-00530-CR (Tex. App.—San Antonio Dec. 17, 2014) (not designated for

publication).

In his writ, Applicant raised ineffective assistance of counsel, jury charge error, and no

evidence. The trial court entered findings rejecting his claims. Applicant then filed a motion to

remand the case so he could avail himself of appointed habeas counsel’s assistance. Applicant
2

attached correspondence from a lawyer who said he was appointed, but withdrew due to a conflict.

Counsel told Applicant that a different lawyer was appointed on April 25, 2016, and that another

lawyer was appointed as of July 5, 2016. Applicant attached a purported order appointing habeas

counsel on that date. However, the record contains no filings from counsel and the findings and

conclusions were served on Applicant, not habeas counsel. 

The trial court shall make supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether

Applicant was, in fact, appointed habeas counsel and, if so, whether habeas counsel wishes to take

any action on the case. The trial court may also make any other supplemental findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claims

for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: November 16, 2016

Do not publish
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains interim summary financail information extracted from the
Consolidated Balance Sheets and Statement of Operations of E-Commerce West Corp.
for the quarter ended October 31, 1998, which statements have been compiled by
management.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          62,872
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                93,500
<PP&E>                                          45,396
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          445,642
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,100
<COMMON>                                     5,871,832
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,450
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   79,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,961)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (77,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (77,557)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   4,650
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (72,907)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.01)
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 21.1

|SUBSIDIARIES OF UNITED ARTISTS THEATRE CIRCUIT, INC. |  | JURISDICTION OF
ORGANIZATION
|---------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------
|Beth Page Theatre Co. Inc.                           |  | New York                    
|CDP Limited Liability Company                        |  | California                  
|Magnolia Amusement Company                           |  | Arkansas                    
|Multimatic Displays, Inc.                            |  | New York                    
|Olympus Pointe Theatre Center Investors, LLC         |  | California                  
|Orix RAM Montgomery Venture General Partnership      |  | Illinois                    
|RAM/U-KOP, LLC                                       |  | Delaware                    
|R and S Theaters, Inc.                               |  | Mississippi                 
|San Francisco Theatres, Inc.                         |  | California                  
|Siam UATC Company Limited Thailand Corp.             |  | Thailand                    
|Staten Theatre Group                                 |  | New York                    
|Staten Theatre Group II                              |  | New York                    
|The Turp Company                                     |  | California                  
|Trumball Theatre Corp.                               |  | Connecticut                 
|UA International Property Holding, Inc.              |  | Colorado                    
|U.A.P.R., Inc.                                       |  | Delaware                    
|UA Property Holding II, Inc.                         |  | Colorado                    
|UA SHOR LLC                                          |  | Delaware                    
|United Artists International Management Company      |  | Colorado                    
|United Artists/Pacific Media Joint Venture           |  |                             
|United Artists Singapore Theatres Pte. Ltd.          |  | Singapore                   
|United Film Distribution Company of South America    |  | Delaware                    
|United Stonestown Corporation                        |  | California                  
|Vogue Realty Company                                 |  | California                  

---

QuickLinks
REF D:A66 

MEMO ROUTING SLIP I

. N-USE FOR. A.PPR.OVALS, DISAPPR.OVALS, 

.ivcu.RRENCES. OR. SIM/Uk ACTIONS 

1 No\ME OR TITLE INITlo\LS CIRCUU.TE 

Mr· Friedman 

ORGo\NIZo\TION o\ND LOCATION COORDINo\TION 

2 

3 

4 

REMo\RKS 

FILE 

INFORMo\1lON 

NECESSARY ACTION 

... 

. . The comment by Mr. owlett was read to Mr •. 

Staffer and then forwarded by the attached 

memo. 

Mr. Stauffer said that in additmcm, such a 

position of seccecy might affect the patent 

rights of the U.S. WITH regard to the M-209. 

He said that he wouli wait for Mr. Clark's 

opinion, and that if all were agreed against 

Mr. Rowlett 1s comment, perhaps all would 

vote against his opinion. Mr. Stauffer said 

that he would discuss it with you and keep 

you informed. 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 

6-10-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526 

FROM No\ME OR TITLE DATE 

ORGo\NIZo\TION o\ND LOCATION MARY G, LANE TELEPHONE 

DD fOIM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Form 811.5, I Apr 48, and AFRQ .,. GPO 1111 • 0 n•SM 

I FEB SO Form 12, 10 Nov f.7, wblob may tie DlllllL 
• 

.. ...__.._94 t .. ~F .ID:~62 .j=-...J 9· i! ~i ... , ..... 11 

Office Mnnordnilum • uN1TEn sTATBs GovEB.NMENT 

AFSA.-03.A.5 Mr. Stauffer 

ROM 1 AFSA-OOT (Capt. Lane) 

8UBJBCT Reply .from AFSA-02 re SN 1881 546: Hagelin 

DA.TB 20 November 1951 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3,3(h)(2) 

1. .Before Mr. Friedman lef't he received from Mr. Rowlett of AFSA-02 the 

i"ollowing comment concerning the application far Patent SN 188,546, Hagelin: 

• ....... . 

2. Mr. Friedman asked that this oe brought to your attention with tne 

comments that (1) sime the patents have already been filed in several foreign 

countries, the sensibility or placing them in secrecy here is qmstionable; and 

(2) the United States is apt to lose a ver,y good friend in Mr. hagelin unless 

the secrecy patent .. , .. ,t; is lifted. 
' RE ·.A:6 

MEMO R ING SUP , ...,I NEVER USE FOR Af'f'RUVAL:'i, U/SAPPROVALS, 

CONCURRENCES, OR SIMILAR ACTIONS 

I NAME OR TITLE INITIALS CIRCULATE 

- ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION DATE COORDINATION 

z FILE 

- INFORMATION 

3 NECESSARY 

ACTION 

- NOTE AND 

RETURN 

- 4 - SEE ME 

- SIGNATURE 

REMARKS 

)~ ¥ '-\y' - ~N"---, '~·-:. vtr ~.:I -- ~-~ ' -~~- ~3 ~ 

\1, 103 3 ) I ~ ~, S" ·\ "" - ' '-

)!{ /()?..fo \ )4~~,~-- ::Zo, tro-o .....__ ' ,_,. 

~ ~ \ s- i--~~ , , 1 -; . 

71 ,1~q . ) 

·~1 41 l~"ll w N::!- W )_t-..,..'{-~r::...- :l.30 

\ (o) ~ 10 

~ ~.) %' J 0 $~~~I~, s~I- 18" ----... !) O >I i.J.. o -1cc·: o ~ ~ 1 r ~ ---.... 

,.30 

FROM NAME OR TITLE DATE '. 

ORGANIZATION AND LOCATION TELEPHONE 

DD FORM 9 5 Replaces DA AGO Form 895, I Apr 48, and AFHQ I FEB 50 Form 12, 10 Nov 17, which may be used. 16--48487-4 GPO *
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 11, 2022

NO. 03

- 22

- 00051

- CR

Richard Lynn Waggoner , Appellant

v.

The State of Texas , Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF IRION COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES GOODWIN, BAKE R, AND T RIANA

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE TRIANA

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the tr i a l court. Having reviewed

the record, it appears that th e Court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal . Therefore, the Court

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction

. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay

costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is made.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION TO MODIFY TIME FOR ORAL ARGUMENT

Appellate case name: Jonathan Levine and Samantha Levine v. Steve Scharn Custom 

Homes, Inc., Steve Scharn, and NewFirst National Bank

Appellate case number: 01-12-00229-CV

Trial court case number: 08DCV162201

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

The parties have filed an agreed motion to modify the time for oral argument. The 

parties request that appellants, Jonathan Levine and Samantha Levine, collectively have twenty 

minutes to present oral argument and that appellees, Steve Scharn Custom Homes, Inc., Steve 

Scharn, and NewFirst National Bank, collectively have twenty minutes to present oral argument. 

We GRANT the parties’ motion. Appellants will have a total of 20 minutes to present their oral 

argument. Appellees will likewise have a total of 20 minutes to present their oral argument.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Laura Carter Higley

Acting for the Court

Date: September 17, 2013
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31120

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONALD RAY OSBORNE Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Middle District of Louisiana

(CR-95-4-B-M2)

July 17, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHÉ, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

A failure to act with knowledge of a disparate impact upon

minorities does not constitute a failure to act because of a

disparate impact upon minorities. Congress need not agree with the

factual recommendations of a federal agency.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2184 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2184

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to institute a trading 
  prohibition for certain issuers that retain public accounting firms 
    that have not been subject to inspection by the Public Company 
          Accounting Oversight Board, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRADING PROHIBITION FOR 2 CONSECUTIVE NON-INSPECTION YEARS.

    Section 104(i) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (15 U.S.C. 
7214(i)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2)(A)(ii), by striking ``the foreign 
        jurisdiction described in clause (i)'' and inserting ``a 
        foreign jurisdiction''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) in the paragraph heading, by striking ``3'' and 
                inserting ``2''; and
                    (B) in subparagraph (A), in the matter preceding 
                clause (i), by striking ``3'' and inserting ``2''.

            Passed the Senate June 22, 2021.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
117th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 2184

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To amend the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 to institute a trading 
  prohibition for certain issuers that retain public accounting firms 
    that have not been subject to inspection by the Public Company 
          Accounting Oversight Board, and for other purposes.
```
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7045

THERON JOHNNY MAXTON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID M. BEASLEY, Governor; MICHAEL MOORE, Director; BARBARA SHEEN; LAURIE BESSINGER, Warden; DOCTOR BEINOR; NURSE SNYDER; NURSE MITCHELL, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (CA-98-1228-10-18BD) Submitted: August 27, 1998 Decided: September 18, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Theron Johnny Maxton, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). Appellant’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district courtorder based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge’s recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate reviewby failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
10. 

OCSla0-84. Y-ftc.C .Pata\ M.. 

l-.q •• ltaT. 

XIMODIDUll JOit .,.. • • "· hl ..... 

l. Wern••• 1• wl• '° SD !ftwWnt ffta ~· om .. dat.t s.p\.u.r 1, lnl ..... ,abc ... eei1 .. ., \lae It.pal 

~ .Pat•' Jeat n no 111Tfttleu d 1Wft _. O.lael 

W..MrCIM'•· 

2. ru1 otn .. bu 41rMte4 \Mt anu .. t1oae fer 

pa\c\a of the 1.ana\1ML• nfernd • 'M 'ftled ad.tt tee 'Pl"OYldou ~ Par. 6, .t..•. I~ a.114 tllat nM appllHti- M 

plaM4 ..ur \&• tJft:re9 y_.. bl•• u ~tlM for la S...U• 

4894 •.s .• u ••4" '7 u.s.c. fttl• •. s .. u .. 'SI. 

H.P.~. 

*J•r. 9~1 Corp.. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-22-?014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

CO~dFID§)JTIAQ
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 49 (Friday, March 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13377]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05792]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Savings and Loan 
Holding Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Home Owners' Loan Act (12 U.S.C. 1461 et 
seq.) (HOLA), Regulation LL (12 CFR part 238), and Regulation MM (12 
CFR part 239), and all other applicable statutes and regulations to 
become a savings and loan holding company and/or to acquire the assets 
or the ownership of, control of, or the power to vote shares of a 
savings association and nonbanking companies owned by the savings and 
loan holding company, including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(e)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 10(c)(4)(B) of the HOLA (12 U.S.C. 1467a(c)(4)(B)). Unless 
otherwise noted, nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the 
United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 9, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (William Lang, Senior Vice 
President) 100 North 6th Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19105-1521:
    1. MSB Financial, MHC, and MSB Financial Corp., Millington, both in 
Millington, New Jersey, to convert to stock form and merge with and 
into MSB Financial Corp., Millington, New Jersey (a newly formed 
holding company), and subsequently MSB Financial Corp., will acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Millington Saving Bank, Millington, 
New Jersey. MSB Financial Corp, also has applied to become a bank 
holding company.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 10, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-05792 Filed 3-12-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
REF ID· ·-- .A39710 

.. . . ... . -·-. "«•"" ~ .. 'I. .~-~~~;r-4~ ~. ·;-··-··· . . -·.· .... 

a_ . - - ,.. -

-~ . . ·- . 

pproved fo R · · .13526.... r elease by NSA • - . . -·-····- . - .... ··-··-· .-- - - --on ---·---·- 09-27-2013 - pursuant to E. 0
• 6 

.,, I 1 I 

SPSIS-1 

SUBJECT·: 

' 

TO: 

R ! .@.lfl!:~ Jit> :~~ 7 s 

/jJJlfY SERVICE FORCES 

S!GNAL SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

1 June 1945 

Maintenance of Security Standards After the End 

Of the European War 

. ~· As the result of victory in Europe, the universal 

tendency has boon to relax many of our war-time restrictions. 

However, restrictions tt ... at affect s.ecurity of the activities 

of Arlington Hall Station and the Signal Security Agency 

cannot now, or at any time in the future, be relaxed. 

d·• The future safoty of' tho United States requires 

that all persons, military or civilian, who have had any 

contact with signal security and signal intelligence 

Operations continU•J to maintain secrecy regarding these 

operations during the remainder of the war and in peace 

as closely as it has boon maintained in the past. 

j. I am anxious that you thoroughly understand the 

implications of this letter and sign the attached certificate. 

When comploted, the certificate should be returned to your 

Branch Personnel Officer. 

1 !ncl 

Certificate 

i~ ' 

I , 

i 1. !~' 

. I . ·.'. 

7f~~' fv. PRESTON CORDERMAN 

Colonel, Signal Corps Co.mm.anding 

roved for release b NSA on 09-24-2013 ursuantto E .0. 1352
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AT MARCH 31, 1999 AND DECEMBER 31, 1998 AND THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-03-1999
<CASH>                                          20,214
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   73,081
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                83,295
<PP&E>                                      11,464,331
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,906,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,650,766
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           40,628
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,610,138
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,650,766
<SALES>                                        171,620
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               171,714
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               211,433
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (38,718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (38,718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (11.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (11.17)
        

</TABLE>