alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
REF ID:A104912 

e 

0 0 p y 

10. 

July 31, 1936 

1. There is to be a meeting o:f' the Patent :Soard called shortly 

for consideration of the followi1JB cases: 

,a. An invention by Oa:-ptain H. G. ~tiller and Nr. W. F. Friedman, 

entitled 11systea and J.~eans for Enciphering and Decipherin& Ma171-etica.J.l7 

Recorded Sif;Il&ls!•. 

b. · A.11 invention by Dr. ?!.J.E. Golay, entitled, 111.Iethods and 

!-!Gans of Observing at a Distance c.nd Recordi:'lg of Wind Direction and 

Speed, and Qaseous Flow in General." 

_g. An invention b7 Coll J. C'. ?.:auborgne and Ur. lf. F. Friedman 

of a s;rsteJJ for enciphering matter electrically transraitted by 

facsir.iile or telephoto means • 

.9:· An invention by Mr. W •. F. li'riedman of a system and apparatus 

for enciphering and dsciyhering telephoto transmitted nessa.ges, sketches, 

:photographs, docuoents, etc. 

,!. An invention by O. D. :Ba.rbulesco entitled 11IIi?provoment in 

Instrunent Landing System Altitude Indicatorn. 

f. J..TJ. invention by J. W. Grieg of a magnetic cor:ipass. 

2. The related :o&1lers are attached. 

3. If the ne:mbers can agree on the action to be taken, an actual 

formal :aeetin.g will not be necessary. 

H. P. Browning, 

l-Tajor, Sit.~ Corps 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-12-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2162 Considered and Passed Senate (CPS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2162

    To establish a 10-year term for the service of the Librarian of 
                               Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 7, 2015

Mr. Blunt (for himself, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Roberts, Mrs. Capito, and Mr. 
Leahy) introduced the following bill; which was read twice, considered, 
                    read the third time, and passed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To establish a 10-year term for the service of the Librarian of 
                               Congress.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Librarian of Congress Succession 
Modernization Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. APPOINTMENT AND TERM OF SERVICE OF LIBRARIAN OF CONGRESS.

    (a) In General.--The President shall appoint the Librarian of 
Congress, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.
    (b) Term of Service.--The Librarian of Congress shall be appointed 
for a term of 10 years.
    (c) Reappointment.--An individual appointed to the position of 
Librarian of Congress, by and with the advice and consent of the 
Senate, may be reappointed to that position in accordance with 
subsections (a) and (b).
    (d) Effective Date.--This section shall apply with respect to 
appointments made on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENT.

    The first paragraph under the center heading ``library of 
congress'' under the center heading ``LEGISLATIVE'' of the Act entitled 
``An Act Making appropriations for the legislative, executive, and 
judicial expenses of the Government for the fiscal year ending June 
thirtieth, eighteen hundred and ninety-eight, and for other purposes'', 
approved February 19, 1897 (29 Stat. 544, chapter 265; 2 U.S.C. 136), 
is amended by striking ``to be appointed by the President, by and with 
the advice and consent of the Senate,''.
                                 <all>
```
1000 A v i ara P ar k way, S u it e 100

, C ar l s b a d

, CA 92011

T 760.431.4200 F 760.454.3869 www.brecommercial.com

March 21, 2012

The Honorable Ray LaHood U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Alaska Airlines’ application for SAN-DCA, Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029.

Dear Secretary LaHood:

My firm, Cassidy Turley, fully supports the appli cation of Alaska Airlines for air service between San Diego and Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). San Diego is the largest region without direct

service to DCA. Additionally, due to the profound community of interest between San Diego and the nation’s capital, the region generates the largest passenger market demand without nonstop

service to the convenient and close-in airport serving our nation’s capital

.

San Diego’s sheer market size to Washington coupled with the fact that San Diego to Dulles average airfares are the highest of west coast cities, should qualify for the limited slots available for this flight. The high airfare is exacerbated when factoring in taxi fares from Dulles to Washington’s city center that average about $60 each way. This means travelers be tween Washington’s city center and San Diego via Dulles can pay on average close to $400 one-way.

There are also countless other San Diego-based a nd Washington-based businesses that are engaged in health science, telecommunications, and national de fense that need quick and convenient access to Reagan National Airport. Cassidy Turley and our c lients have an immediate need for additional nonstop air service to our nation’s capital. Alaska Airlin es service would add a needed nonstop option to a primary gateway to Washington, DC. Cassidy Turley joins with the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority, the San Diego Regiona l Economic Development Corporati on, the World Trade Center San Diego, and the San Diego Regional Chamber of Comme rce in support of Alaska Airlines’ application for San Diego – Washington Reagan National slots.

We thank the Department of Transportation for th e opportunity to comment on the above referenced docket and we hope to hear of a favorable review of Alaska Airlines’ San Diego – DCA proposal soon.

Sincerely,

Dennis Visser, SIOR Managing Director (760) 431.4216

dvisser@breb.com

CA Lic. 01255595
*Wednesday, July 14, 1999*

MOTION DOCKET

99-570.

#### DeRolph v. State.

Perry C.P. No. 22043. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal of right from the Court of Common Pleas of Perry County. The record in this cause was filed on June 23,1999.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the parties shall brief this case in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI and comply with S.CtPrac.R. VII and all other applicable rules of practice.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0000909

29-NOV-2013

12:40 PM
11 TH C O URT O F A PPEALS

E ASTLAND

, T EXAS

J UDGMENT

James Christopher North

, * From the 350 th District

Court of Taylor County,

Trial Court No. 9790

- D

.

Vs. No. 11

- 11

- 00338

- CR * January 24, 2014

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Willson, J

. (Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is

no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s

opinion, the judgment of the t rial court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from American
Electromedics  Corp.  Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  January 31, 1999 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>                                              
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
 
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             JUL-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                        107
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                 1,443
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                   2,432
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              356
<PP&E>                                        900
<DEPRECIATION>                                (467)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11,906
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         5,456
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   2,387
<COMMON>                                      767
<OTHER-SE>                                    3,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11,906
<SALES>                                       2,290
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              2,290
<CGS>                                         1,454
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 1,454
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              2,134
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            58
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (1,356)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (1,356)
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (1,356)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 (.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (.20)
        


</TABLE>
. POL•90 

Rev. ADDRESS ONl.\I 

• REF ID:A36320 • 

·. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

All communications respecting this application should give tile 

serial number, date of filing, and name of the applicant. THE COMMISSIONER OF PA"l'~NTS 

L 

WASHINGTON 2S. D. C. UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

WASHINGTON 

Hen~7 s. Stsutfer 

trational sacurit7 Agenc7 waah1ngton 2;;. D. C • 

Applicant: 

Ser.No. 

Filed 

_J For 

PAPER No. ~ 

Willia F • Friedman 

MA1LEO 

&EB 15 1956 

PAT .... , •·'-''1o, 

Pleasefind below a communicationfrom the 

EXAMINER in charge of this application. 

. DIV ~4 

~rlM-l~ -----------------'---------

Commissioner of Patents. 

Tb.6 amendment tiled Fe'bl."ua17 3,, 19.$6 ia not ;found 

to be such ~ull and complete :'eettponae to the :rejection 

mailed February>, 19$3 as required by th& Rules o.f 

Praotioe. since no propet" tx-av•rne appear• to the rejection of claim 11. see &specially Rule 111 of the 

Rules of Practice• pfU"ticulm:-17 paragraphs (b) and (c) 

thereof. Applicant is given twent7 de.ya to complete hia 

re!iponse to the rejection mailed Februal"1 5- 195.3 and 

avoid the necenait7 :tor eon&idel"ing the question o:t 

abandonnmnt in this ease. 

16-68457-2 GPO 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2
 
                  ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULE
 
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Metra Biosystems, Inc.
 
    The audits referred to in our report dated July 18, 1996, included the
related financial statement schedule as of June 30, 1996 and 1995, and for each
of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 1996 included in the Form
10K. This financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial
statement schedule based on our audits. In our opinion, such financial statement
schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
 
    We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement
on Form S-8 No. 33-99200 of our report dated July 18, 1996, with respect to the
consolidated balance sheet of Metra Biosystems, Inc. and subsidiaries as of June
30, 1996 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders'
equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period
ended June 30, 1996, which report appears in the June 30, 1997 annual report on
Form 10-K of Metra Biosystems, Inc.
 
                                          KPMG Peat Marwick LLP
 
San Francisco, California
September 26, 1997
.... - ·---.-· :·· ----- -- . . . ~----- ----·-··· -~~---"'0:1:11_ J:'\,;,C,ai.I: "'C""-:-1n-·.-AS~1-o· LL 0 

,> 

.. ·-I'-\_ 

.•' 

.r' 

l ~~/'. w•..,_ -

WAR DEPART~T 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON Jul.J 24,. 1911 

l. AccorcUog to 'be lad progreae raport of the l&boratorioa at.. 

ft. ~J.cmmou,Jl, ae 4nelopmn'l ot '11• o1pber 11'111Cb1ne1 tunda tor •h1ab 

be.._ a"&J.lable on hlJ' 1 1 19a<>, waa b'1t 20 per ceat oomp18'e4 b7 

:,.pru '°• 19Sl. 

2. Wh11 l."l!Yialoa reprd.s the clenlopmmrt or th11!1 cipher .opparatu 

as of prime 1mponuo• mt onl7 '\o '&he &1Snal Cor-~a but; to ~e •hole 

;:Zm1, as well as 1io the Yariou l&rpr am1Distrat1Y• ofnces or tb.e 

ailltu;r enabl1eblllea.t. It 'beliowa t.bat thie denlopmn' ahould be 

proncutacl amch mare Y1gor0u~ thin baa t~a tar '1een the caM. 

a. file reoaat •1111\- of ihe t~n11tant Ch1ef of ~'Utt. a-2, to thie 

otf1ce, d.u.l'.lng ti1h1ch ower u hour'• ccu:sf'erea.oa •as deYOte4 to a uiacw.-

111011 of cipher caohinea anu 'their de'f81opamt 1 leads ~is D1Tta1on "o 

belie•e that tu General f>tatf 1a Y1talq 1atereSte4 ill a11Ch a p:roJect 

u la ·no'&' bei1ltS earned on in this connection, and that the ~te.tf 4eeea 

the aomplet-1on, ae soon as P•n111ble, of the 4ewelopment o:t e. Cipher 

machiAe as hlgbq acl1'1aable. 

4. Dm-1118 the recent conference between Ur·. Crllhal!l and i.ir. ir1•dllun, 

on the occaa:lon of Ur .. Oralmm'a ns1t to thie of£1ce laat seek, it waa 

r.e1,era.'te4 b7 t.be lor•r that th1a 41Yelopaent can be puraud onl7 a• 

T1goroual.r ·a1 the lo• pr1or1'l7 accorded this project permita, it now 

being near the tail ead of all •ire proJect• aesigned to tho loboratoriea. 

5. .for ~ foregoing NUOAe 1t 1• vpnt;q reooaae.n4ed. •bat the 

priori v now acoorded this pl'OJect be changed, and that the l)roJect be 

grantod. aa hisb a priority aa is eonaiaten.t with the development of other 

p.roJects ot olmilar 1a,ponenoo. 

"D. a. cratord., 

ltcJor, t'igml Corps. 

\._~p6roved for Release by NSA on 11-21-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 

_ . 44 _ ... .: .... -=s----· .. JIZ!.·- .• • ?W • > . ,,. *·":'- •.-·--.~ .. -· .. e .. e -.45-... .<SP:Z .;a c .. % •.• .. c: 4 5 ... 

---.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              16
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,350
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,528
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,218
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,787
<BONDS>                                          1,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,667)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,218
<SALES>                                            186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   186
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 217
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (121)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (121)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (20)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (141)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of TVI  Corporation(the  "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report") I,Thomas K. Plunkett,
Vice President Finance, of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 1350,
as adopted pursuant to $ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
company.

/s/ Thomas K. Plunkett
--------------------------
    Thomas K. Plunkett
    Vice President Finance
    November 12, 2002
Exhibit 10.1

                              Casey Container Corp.
                              A Nevada Corporation
                            7255 E. San Alfredo Drive
                              Scottsdale, AZ 85258
                                Tel. 602-819-4181

July 31, 2011

Denis M. Leonard
Crown Hospitality Group, LLC
812 E. Woodland Road
Schaumberg, Illinois 60173

Re: July 1, 2011 Funding Agreement between Casey Container Corp. ("Casey")
    and Crown Hospitality Group, LLC ("Crown")

Dear Mr. Leonard:

Based on several conversations yesterday and in accordance with Section 4.8,
Notices, of the Funding Agreement dated July 1, 2011, the parties hereby agree
to modify the due dates of the tranches as per Exhibit A of the Funding
Agreement. The first (July 31, 2011 for $400,000) and second (September 30, 2011
for $1,000,000) tranches are hereby modified and combined into one tranche for
$1,400,000 to be funded no later than September 1, 2011. Upon receipt of the
$1,400,000, Casey will issue 21,276,500 shares of restricted Common shares. The
December 2011 and March thru June 2012 tranches remain as per Exhibit A in both
amounts and shares.

The parties agree to the above modification to Exhibit A of the Funding
Agreement dated July 31, 2011 as per above.

CROWN HOSPITALITY GROUP, LLC


By /s/ Denis M. Leonard                                      Dated July 31, 2011
   ---------------------------------------
   Denis M. Leonard, Managing Member

CASEY CONTAINER CORP.


By /s/ Martin R. Nason                                       Dated July 31, 2011
   ---------------------------------------
   Martin R. Nason, President & CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6786

ANTHONY JOHNSON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

G. SINDY, in his individual capacity; R. RODERICK, in his 

individual capacity; DR. JACK CUNNING, in his individual 

capacity,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District 

Judge. (8:14-cv-01188-DKC)

 

Submitted: October 16, 2014 Decided: October 20, 2014

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Johnson appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) 

complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Johnson v. Sindy, No. 8:14-cv-01188-DKC (D. Md. 

Apr. 28, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Debra RoseGifford, Mayor

Sincerely, Again we very much support Harris Aircraft's application to upgrade to an Air Carrier Certificate. We are aware that they also provide needed services to our neighboring small isolated communities as well. During the summer they fly in charters with clients for some of our local lodges/fish charters. In the early spring they fly out commercially caught troll fish when needed. These services support the economics of our community. They also carry freight including medlcines, State required water samples and other necessities. Harris Aircraft is very helpful in taking out Medevac patients when needed. Harris Aircraft based out of Sitka currently serves our remote community with EssentialAir Service flights twice a week. This service provides transportation for community members and others to travel to and from Port Alexander. This service is extremely important for our community, as it is the only commercial means of transportation in and out of Port Alexander, which is based in close proximity to our community. This letter is to express the support of the City of Port Alexander in Harris Aircraft's application for an Air Carrier Certificate. To Whom It Concerns, September 

### 12, 2014 

### City of Port Alexa nder

P.O.Box 8125 Port Alexander, Alaska 

### 99836 907-568-2211 cityofportalexander@yahoo.com
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-19-00811-CV

Yvonne SALAZAR-HERNANDEZ and Tony Hernandez,

Appellants

v.

CHAMPION HOMES AT MISSION DEL RIO,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CV07914

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 10, 2021

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

A show cause order was issued notifying appellants that their brief was late and instructing 

them to file the appellants’ brief or a motion for extension of time within ten days, or this appeal 

would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellants failed to respond to our order. Therefore, 

we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a); 42.3(a), (c). Costs of 

appeal are taxed against appellants.

PER CURIAM