alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-6536

TIMOTHY T. KINARD,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH BATTLE, Administrator, Abbeville County Detention 

Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Bruce H. Hendricks, District 

Judge. (5:14-cv-04391-BHH)

Submitted: October 31, 2016 Decided: November 17, 2016

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy T. Kinard, Appellant Pro Se. Alphonso Simon, Jr., 

Assistant Attorney General, Donald John Zelenka, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Timothy T. Kinard seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Kinard has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 117th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2061 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

117th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2061

 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure coverage of 
          mental health services furnished through telehealth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 15, 2021

    Mr. Cassidy (for himself, Ms. Smith, Mr. Cardin, and Mr. Thune) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to ensure coverage of 
          mental health services furnished through telehealth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Telemental Health Care Access Act of 
2021''.

SEC. 2. ENSURING COVERAGE FOR MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FURNISHED THROUGH 
              TELEHEALTH.

    (a) In General.--Section 1834(m)(7) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395m(m)(7)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``subject to 
        subparagraph (B),'';
            (2) by striking ``(A) In general.--The geographic'' and 
        inserting ``The geographic''; and
            (3) by striking subparagraph (B).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect as if included in the enactment of section 123 of division 
CC of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116-260).

SEC. 3. STUDY AND REPORT ON UTILIZATION OF MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES 
              FURNISHED THROUGH TELEHEALTH.

    Not later than 1 year after the first day after the end of the 
emergency period described in section 1135(g)(1)(B) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1320b-5(g)(1)(B)), the Secretary of Health and 
Human Services shall submit to Congress a report on the utilization of 
mental health services furnished through telehealth under section 
1834(m)(7) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395m(m)(7)), that includes any 
recommendations of the Secretary regarding--
            (1) fraud or abuse prevention with respect to such 
        services; and
            (2) additional funding that the Office of Inspector General 
        of the Department of Health and Human Services may require for 
        purposes of conducting audits, investigations, and other 
        oversight and enforcement activities with respect to the 
        furnishing of such services.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>      5
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               Jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                          36,841
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  453,836
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    376,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,555,862
<PP&E>                                       1,741,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                 885,427
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,047,368
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,504,022
<BONDS>                                        496,937
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       147,295
<OTHER-SE>                                     713,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,047,368
<SALES>                                      1,397,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,397,850
<CGS>                                        1,213,820
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,213,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                85,086
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,986
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 87,355
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,516
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             59,839
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    59,839
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.47


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 13897]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06022]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Employment and Training Administration


Notice of Availability of Funds and Funding Opportunity 
Announcement for Face Forward 3-Intermediary and Community Grants

AGENCY: Employment and Training Administration, Labor.

ACTION: Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Funding Opportunity Number: FOA-ETA-15-04.
SUMMARY: The Employment and Training Administration (ETA) plans to 
award four intermediary organization grants of $5,000,000 each and 
approximately 10 community organization grants of up to $1,050,000 
each, totaling approximately $30,500,000 to provide services to youth 
between the ages of 14 to 24 that have been involved in the Juvenile 
Justice System and never convicted in the adult criminal system.
    Face Forward 3-Intermediary and Community grants will build on 
existing promising practices to assist youth participants, such as 
earning industry-recognized credentials in demand occupations and 
sectors, participating in self-exploration activities, providing on-
the-job training (OJT) and work-based learning opportunities, 
participating in career planning and management activities, and 
strengthening industry and employer connections to ensure that the 
training program directly aligns with the skills and credentials needed 
to secure employment.
    The complete FOA and any subsequent FOA amendments in connection 
with this solicitation are described in further detail on ETA's Web 
site at http://www.doleta.gov/grants/ or on http://www.grants.gov. The 
Web sites provide application information, eligibility requirements, 
review and selection procedures, and other program requirements 
governing this solicitation.

DATES: The closing date for receipt of applications under this 
announcement is April 23, 2015. Applications must be received no later 
than 4:00:00 p.m. Eastern Time.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Roach, 200 Constitution Avenue 
NW., Room N-4716, Washington, DC 20210; Telephone: 202-693-3820. The 
Grant Officer for this FOA is Melissa Abdullah.

    Signed March 11, 2015 in Washington, DC
Eric D. Luetkenhaus,
Grant Officer/Division Chief, Employment and Training Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-06022 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4510-FT-P
Exhibit 12.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of POSCO;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f)) for the company and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such
internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the
audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.
  /s/ Lee, Ku-TaekLee, Ku-TaekChief Executive Officer andRepresentative Director
2013 WI 86

O FFICE OF THE C LERK

110 E AST M AIN S TREET , S UITE 215

P.O. B OX 1688

M ADISON , WI 53701-1688

T ELEPHONE (608) 266-1880
F ACSIMILE (608) 267-0640

Web Site: www.wicourts.gov

October 22, 2013

To:

Douglas James Hoffer

de la Mora & de la Mora

15255 Watertown Plank Rd. Elm Grove, WI 53122

Andrew Mishlove

Law Offices of Andrew Mishlove 4425 N. Port Washington Rd. #110 Milwaukee, WI 53212-1035 Lauren Stuckert

Law Offices of Andrew Mishlove 4425 N. Port Washington Rd., #110 Glendale, WI 53212

You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following Order for Editorial Revision:

2011AP2888 Village of Elm Grove v. Richard K. Brefk a

Attorney Andrew Mishlove has filed a motion request ing that this court issue an order that editorially revises the written decision in th e above-entitled matter. Specifically, he requests that the court editorially revise the opinion to re flect in a footnote that "Attorney Mishlove was first retained in the matter subsequent to the time that the ten-day time limit for demanding a refusal hearing was missed." He avers that "Mr. Br efka, or his predecessor counsel, missed that

time limit several months before the date that Atto rney Mishlove was retained."

Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that footnote 3 is editorially revised to add the following paragraph to the beginning of the footnote: "Final ly, we note that Attorney Andrew Mishlove first made an appearance in this case subsequent to the time that the ten-day time limit for demanding a refusal hearing had expired. It appear s that Mr. Brefka, or his predecessor counsel, missed the time prior to the date of Attorney Mishl ove's appearance." The second paragraph of footnote 3 will then begin, "Further, we note that Tthe municipal court . . . ."

Diane M. Fremgen Clerk of Supreme Court
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE

.

IN THE 

## A RIZONA 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEALS

D IVISION O NE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent ,

v.
LLOYD JAMES DARON, JR. , Petitioner

.
N o . 1 CA

- CR 1 9

- 0 108 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR20 15

- 144027

- 001 The Honorable Joan M. Sinclair , Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELI EF DENIED

COUNSEL
Maricopa County Attorney’s Office , Phoenix By Frankie Y. Jones Counsel for Respondent
Law Office of Stephen M. Johnson, Phoenix By Stephen M. Johnson Counsel for Petitioner FILED 9-17-2019S TATE v. DARON Decision of the Court

2 MEMORANDUM DECISION
Presiding Judge Jennifer B. Campbell, Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop, and Judge Michael J. Brown delivered the decision of the Court.

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Petitioner Lloyd James Daron, Jr. seeks review of the superior court’s order denying his petition for post

- conviction relief, filed pursuant to Arizona Ru le of Criminal Procedure 3 2.1. Thi s is petitioner’s first petition.
¶2 Absent an abuse of discretion or error of law, this court will not disturb a superior court’s ruling on a petition for post

- conviction relief. State v. Gutierrez , 229 Ariz. 573, 577, ¶ 19 (2012). It is petitioner’s burden to show that the superior court abused its discretion by denying the petition for post

- conviction relief. See State v. Poblete , 227 Ariz. 537, 538, ¶ 1 (App. 2011) (petitioner has burden of establishing abuse of discretion on review).
¶3 We have reviewed the record in this matter, the supe rior court’s order denying the petition for post

- conviction relief, and the petition for review. We find that petitioner has not established an abuse of discretion.
¶4 We grant review but deny relief.
REF ID:A63339 

Cololllll Gt.u.n C • J&cobua ~Co ill aw'ant ..... 

~ 

:D~ Of Jutructton 

... .,...,..t Scbool 

1.-t .. lTOlr, 'f1qlnla 

._,.OU• 

X tw. that t.lw Chief ot ..... ~1a1ns ~viii~ 

.. --... WUoh Y1th Col<mel JCowWsk1 ttr ... u-. Ve 

ue npatiJal • p:it.t tw n 19561 to eonas..t ot om QI.CO 

ror .eh ot • 3..,..k clUIH w \le belcl ~ the ,,.56 ~l. rear, u4 w baYa bopt tba.\ ou:- ~--*' v1U 'M 

...,.w. 

9*lU 1Pia tor ~ Uten.tui-e. 

•1~~. 

pproved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 

::::~ 

~-~· ~ 

""'" ·~ • c 

~· ·---.;. 

~ 

~~ 

~ ~ 

.. . -

·-.-. 

--~ 

i 

"' 

.. .. 

..... 

.. 

.:.:: 

... 

-... 

~· 

~­-.... 

~ 

•
Exhibit 12 (a)


			     XEROX CREDIT CORPORATION
		COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
				   (In Millions)


			 Nine Months Ended
			   September 30,          Year Ended December 31,
			    1995   1994      1994   1993   1992   1991   1990


Income before income taxes $  92  $ 110     $147   $ 154  $ 158  $ 164  $ 182

Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense
     Xerox debt                4      3        5       4      2     -       2
     Other debt              161    151      197     205    210    200    205
       Total fixed charges   165    154      202     209    212    200    207

Earnings available for
  fixed charges            $ 257  $ 264    $ 349   $ 363  $ 370  $ 364  $ 389

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges (1)         1.56   1.71     1.73    1.74   1.75   1.82   1.88


   
(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed based on the
     Company's continuing operations by dividing total earnings available
     for fixed charges by total fixed charges. Debt has been assigned to
     discontinued operations based on the net assets of the discontinued
     operations and the debt to equity ratios that existed at the time the
     assets were acquired.  Management believes that this allocation method
     is reasonable.  For 1995, the amount of interest expense that would have 
     been allocated to discontinued operations is insignificant and therefore 
     is now reported within continuing operations.  The discontinued 
     operations consist of the Company's real estate development and related 
     financing operations and its third-party financing and leasing
     businesses.     







(11)
<PAGE>
Christina Franz 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

American Chemistry Council (ACC) 

700 Second St., NE 

Washington, DC 20002 

clu·istina franz@americanchemistrv.com 

Dear Ms. Franz, 

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

Thank you for your letter of May 7, 2015 requesting a 120-day extension of the current 60-day 

public comment period for EPA's TSCA Work Plan Problem Fonnulation and Initial 

Assessment of 1,4-Dioxane (Problem Formulation). The letter also requested a meeting with 

EPA to discuss the Problem Formulation document. 

EPA is denying the request to extend the comment period for the Problem Formulation document 

because the document is very short and does not include detailed analyses. 

On May 28, 2014, EPA met with representatives from ACC and by June 16, 2014 ACC 

followed-up by providing limited exposure data. Some of those data are included in the Problem 

Formulation document (Appendix C) and the analysis plan indicates EPA will use the data to the 

extent possible. In February and April 2015, EPA followed up with ACC with questions about 

occupational monitoring data and other consumer product data that ACC submitted. EPA did not 

receive from ACC clarification on these additional monitoring data to adequately characterize 

1 ,4-dioxane exposure. At your request, EPA met again with ACC and numerous industry 

representatives on May 27, 2015 to discuss the Problem F 01mulation document. 

EPA welcomes any additional data relevant to the worker and consumer exposure pathways. 

EPA plans to evaluate current data and any additional data that may be submitted to the docket 

(EPA-HQ-OPPT-2015-0078). Even after the comment period closes, EPA will make every effort 

to review all data that are available at the time EPA conducts any subsequent assessment of 1,4-

dioxane. 

Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. 

Dr. Stanley Bar 

Deputy Division Director 

Risk Assessment Division (7403M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

Internet Address (URL) • http /twww.epa gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted w1th Vegetable 011 Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 10.7



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           PEACHTREE FIBEROPTICS, INC.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





VIA FAX


October 29, 1999

David Spector
c/o  Peachtree FiberOptics, Inc.
3300 PGA Blvd., Suite 810
Palm Beach Gardens, FL  33410

Dear David:

This letter will confirm our offer of employment at Peachtree FiberOptics,  Inc.
("VFIN") which intends to merge with vFinance Holdings,  Inc. and Union Atlantic
LC. VFIN has agreed to provide you the following compensation:

     1.  $75,000 annual base salary to be paid bi-weekly which will begin
         immediately upon VFIN's closing of its $5 million private placement
         which is currently being presented to financial and venture capital
         institutions ("Funding").
     2.  Options to acquire 75,000 common shares of VFIN at an exercise price of
         $2.50 per share ("Options"). Except as provided herein below the
         Options shall expire October 28, 2004. The Options shall vest and be
         exercisable pursuant to the following terms and conditions:

         a.       3,000 options shall be vested immediately;

         b.       3,000 options shall vest each month for 11 months beginning
                  November 28, 1999 and on the 28th day of each much thereafter;

         c.       19,500 options shall vest October 28, 2000;

         d.       19,500 options shall vest October 28, 2001;

         e.       In the event you resign or are terminated, then all non-vested
                  Options shall expire and shall be deemed null and void; you
                  shall have 30 days from the date of such resignation or
                  termination to exercise Options which have vested after which
                  time any such vested Options which remain unexercised shall
                  expire and shall be null and void;

         f.       In the event of your death while you are an employee of VFIN,
                  your family shall have the right to exercise any vested
                  Options within 90 days of your death;

         g.       The Options are not assignable.


     3.  It is the intention of VFIN to establish a bonus/incentive program as
         soon as possible following the Funding. It is the intention of VFIN to
         register the common shares underlying the Options as soon as practible.
     4.  You shall be entitled to all other benefits available to employees of
         VFIN.



PEACHTREE FIBEROPTICS, INC.



By: /s/ Leonard J. Sokolow
    ------------------------------------------------
      Leonard J. Sokolow, Authorized Representative





          3300 PGA BLVD., SUITE 810, PALM BEACH GARDENS, FLORIDA 33410,
                   VOICE: (305) 374-3575 FAX: (206) 374-5879