alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 

 Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 10-Q



    Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

 Securities Exchange Act of 1934





For the Quarter ended October 31, 1996

      

Commission File No. 0-10315

 ROYAL CASINO GROUP INC.

 (Name of Registrant as specified in its charter)



                 Utah                                95-4091368 
                    

(State or other jurisdiction of            (IRS Employer        
                                              

 Incorporation or organization)          Identification No.)    
                                                                
        



152 Sherman St.

Deadwood, SD 57732

 (Address of principal executive offices)



                         (605) 578-1299                         
                 (605) 578-1298

         (Registrant's telephone number)                        
  (Registrant's fax number)  



      Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

   Common Stock,  $0.001 Par







Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

[x] Yes      [ ] No



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all
documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

[x] Yes     [ ] No



As of October 31, 1996  4,436,459 shares of registrant's no par
value common stock were outstanding.



















































                                                  SIGNATURES







Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed by
the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.







                                                                
             ROYAL CASINO GROUP INC.               



                                                                
                            (Registrant) 

                             



                                                                
      By: _  _/s/  Jon F. Elliott____________

                                                                
           Jon F. Elliott, President

                                                                
           and Chief Executive Officer





Date:  December 15, 1996_____





                                                                
     By: _  _/s/   Larry C. Close            

                                                                
            Larry C. Close   

                                                                
            Director, Vice President
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 29, 2022

No. 04-22-00266-CR

James KEARNS,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022W0277

Honorable Velia J. Meza, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On June 1, 2022, we issued a letter to the court reporters notifying them the reporter’s 

record was late. The court reporters each responded to our notice by stating their portion of the 

reporter’s record was not filed because appellant had failed to pay or make arrangements to pay 

their fee for preparing the record and appellant was not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

We therefore ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court stating either (1) 

the reporters’ fees have been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporters’ fees; or 

(2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporters’ fees by July 11, 2022.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of June, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 19, 2022

No. 04-21-00523-CV

Leonardo SAENZ,

Appellant

v.

Julia SAENZ,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 21-02-00035CVF

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After consideration, we GRANT IN PART Appellee’s Motion for Extension of Time to File 

her Brief and ORDER appellee to file her brief on or before May 12, 2022.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of April, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 6253

ARYEE HENDERSON , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. LASHAWN PEEPLES, Associate Warden; GREGORY WASHINGTON, Associate Warden; JAMES PARRISH, Associate Warden; MICHAEL STEPHAN, Warden; MS. GASQUE, Grievance Coordinator , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. Bruce H. Hendricks , District Judge. ( 4:19

- cv - 01861

- BHH )

Submitted : April 14, 2023 Decided: May 10, 2023

Before DIAZ and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges , and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Aryee Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Brian L. Craven, Daniel Roy Settana, Jr., MCKAY FIRM, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-6253 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/10/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Aryee Henderson appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s

rec ommendation and granting summary judgment to Defendants on Henderson ’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint . After reviewing the record, we conclude that the district court correctly
determined that Henderson failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies prior to filing his complaint. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment

. Henderson v. Peeples , No. 4:19

- cv - 01861

- BHH (D.S.C. Nov. 19, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in t he materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 21-6253 Doc: 26 Filed: 05/10/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-50667

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CONCEPCION LOPEZ-MEJIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-02-CR-716-1

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Concepcion Lopez-Mejia appeals the sentence imposed

following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United

States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

Lopez-Mejia contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element

of a separate offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) that should have

been alleged in his indictment. Lopez-Mejia maintains that he
No. 03-50667

-2-

pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentry

under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds

the maximum term of imprisonment and supervised release which may

be imposed for that offense.

In Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235

(1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of

separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing

provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. 

Lopez-Mejia acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

Almendarez-Torres, but asserts that the decision has been cast

into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres

“unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule

it.” Dabeit, 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and

citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of

filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks

that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. 

AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
II 

Calendar No. 270 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2165 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to permanently authorize the Land 

and Water Conservation Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Mr. TESTER, Mr. HEINRICH, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. 

BENNET, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. WYDEN, and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the 

following bill; which was read the first time 

OCTOBER 19, 2015 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to permanently 

authorize the Land and Water Conservation Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT AUTHORIZATION OF THE LAND 

4 AND WATER CONSERVATION FUND. 

5 Section 200302 of title 54, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2165 PCS

1 (1) in subsection (b), in the matter preceding 

2 paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘During the period end3 ing September 30, 2015, there’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘There’’; and 

5 (2) in subsection (c)(1), by striking ‘‘through 

6 September 30, 2015’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 270 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2165 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to permation Fund. nently authorize the Land and Water ConservaOCTOBER 19, 2015 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
99-904.

#### Villas Condominium Unit Owners’ Assn. v. Gammarino.

Hamilton App. No. C-980626. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 1437, 713 N.E.2d 1049. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (see 14 CFR 302. 201                     *et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2015-0033.                

*Date Filed:*                     February 19, 2015.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify Scope:*                     March 12, 2015.                

## Description

Joint application of Southern Air Inc. (“Southern”) and Florida West International Airways, Inc. (“Florida West”) requesting approval of the de facto transfer of all international authority held by Florida West to Southern.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2015-0037.                

*Date Filed:*                     February 20, 2015.                

## Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify Scope

March 13, 2015.

## Description

Application of Liberty Helicopters Inc. requesting authority to engage in scheduled operations as a commuter air carrier and proposes to operate flights between various New York City heliports, and the following destinations: NYC Metro Airports, Mohegan Sun Casino, Montauk, Southampton, and East Hampton (“Proposed Service”).

 Barbara J. Hairston,

Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2015-05893 Filed 3-13-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
J'Jr. J'ohn von ~ 

&rialt <J cf (ptf 

l 5 f\PR 1954 

~ I:iat!tute tor AdWUlCed Stud.y 

Princeton University 

Princeton, hv Jera4y 

'1'bl uext .110etin,g ot the lational Security Agency 

Scient1tic A4.vuoq Boa.rd will open a.t lOaOO •·•· on 'l\1~n,dc.¥, 20 April 1954, 1n the 8tatt conrerenco :Rooo 

(19-2321) at the la.viii.l Security Station, Waahillgton. 

IQclo#ed tar 7aur ilxt~tiQn u a copy ot the 

propoaed aeenda rw: tbe tvo day eees1on. 

I u looldng t~ to Heins 70\1 at thit mot!Dg. 

Incl. 

CCI AG 

c/s 

8/ ASST (Mr. Fried.nnn) 

SineereJ,y, 

WILLIAM F. ntIErMAJf 

X...Cuti~ Secreta.eyEA lei~H'ic MYUor.v BoArd 

M/R: In:forms membere at NSABAB of ti~ and place of opening 

eesoion of April Board meeting. 

LT. I. T. McOONAID/6o493/10 Apr r:}t/nmrt 

@'pproved for Release by CIA on 07-23-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352a
NO. 07-11-0447-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JANUARY 12, 2012

______________________________

KIRT MCDONALD A/K/A KIRT WAYNE MCDONALD, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF POTTER COUNTY;

NO. 125606-P; HONORABLE ARTHUR WARE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

	Pursuant to a plea bargain, Appellant, Kirt McDonald a/k/a Kirt Wayne McDonald, was convicted of issuance of a bad check and punishment was assessed at a fine of $175.00.  The *Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal* reflects that Appellant's case is a plea bargain case and that he has no right of appeal.  The certification notwithstanding, Appellant filed a *pro se* notice of appeal challenging his conviction.  

	By letter dated December 15, 2011, this Court notified Appellant of the consequences of the certification and invited him to either file an amended certification showing a right of appeal or demonstrate other grounds for continuing the appeal on or before December 30, 2011.  

	Appellant timely filed a response seeming to challenge his conviction.  His response, however, does not contradict the trial court's certification nor does it demonstrate grounds for continuing this appeal.  Because Appellant has failed to file an amended certification reflecting a right of appeal and has not shown good cause for continuing this appeal, we have no alternative but to dismiss this appeal based on the certification signed by the trial court.  *See* Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d).

							Patrick A. Pirtle

							      Justice

Do not publish.

2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                          302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Jon Elliott, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Baymark Technologies,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of January 31, 2005; and

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officers  and I have  indicated in this
quarterly report whether there were significant  changes in internal controls or
in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent  evaluation,  including any corrective  actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: March 14, 2005


/s/ Jon Elliott
- -----------------------
 Jon Elliott, President
exhibit10_2.htm






Letter Of Resignation


 


Pursuant to the agreement between ACRO Inc. and Top Alpha, which calls for the resignation of all board members and officers as a condition for the completion of the agreement, I hereby submit my resignation from the board of directors of ACRO Inc.


 


 



	
/s/ Dan Elnathan

	  
	
Dan Elnathan

	
Date
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




Confidential Materials omitted and filed separately with the

Securities and Exchange Commission. Asterisks denote omissions.



Merck KGaA . Germany . Frankfurter Str. 250 . 64293 Darmstadt



VIA COURIER




	 	 	 	 	 

	Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

	 	Date
	 	June 2, 2010
	Steven J. Ritter, Ph.D., J.D.

	 	Division/Dept.
	 	Corporate Legal — CL-M
	Vice President — Intellectual Property and Contracts

	 	Care of
	 	Jens Eckhardt — ns
	167 Sidney Street

	 	Phone
	 	+49 — 61 51 — 72 23 98
	Cambridge, MA 02139

	 	Fax
	 	+49 — 61 51 — 72 23 73
	USA

	 	E-Mail
	 	jens.eckhardt@merck.de






Our license agreement dated December 18, 2007, effective February 4 2008 (the “Agreement”)



Dear Steve,



It is recognized that Idera has met its obligations of delivering [**] Follow-on Compounds in
accordance with Section 3.6 of the Agreement. Merck is actively characterizing these Follow-on
Compounds toward a goal of selecting [**] for possible development. As this characterization is
currently ongoing, Merck requests that Idera allow Merck to extend the period of time for selecting
the Follow-on Compounds such that Merck’s right to make a selection pursuant to Section 3.6 of the
Agreement would expire on [**]. This addition time will enable Merck to further characterize the
Follow-on Compounds and make a more informed decision in the selection process. During this
additional time period, Idera’s role in Merck’s selection process is expected to be passive and no
additional resources are expected to be provided by Idera under the terms of the Agreement.



If you are in agreement with the above please indicate so by returning the attached duplicate of
this letter duly signed.



Very truly yours,




	 	 	 	 	 
	Merck KGaA

	 	 	 	Agreed:
	 
	 	 	 	 
	i.V.

	 	i.V.
	 	Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	 
	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Astrid Perschl
 
 Dr. Astrid
Perschl

	 	/s/ Jens Eckhardt
 
 Jens
Eckhardt
	 	/s/ Louis J. Arcudi
 
 Louis
J. Arcudi, III







	 	 	 	 	 

	Merck KGaA · Germany
	 	 	 	 
	Frankfurter Str. 250

	 	Partnership limited by shares
	 	Executive Board
	64293 Darmstadt

	 	Commercial Register AG Darmstadt HRB 6164
	 	and General Partners:
	Phone +49 6151 72-0

	 	Registered Office: Darmstadt	 	 
	Fax +49 6151 72-2000

	 	Chairman of the Supervisory Board:
	 	Karl-Ludwig Kley (Chairman),
	www.merck.de

	 	Wilhelm Simson
	 	Michael Becker, Bernd Reckmann, Elmar Schnee
<PAGE>   1
                                                                 EXHIBIT 99.1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

Board of Directors and Stockholders of JumboSports Inc.

In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements of
JumboSports Inc., as of January 31, 1997 and for the year ended January 31,
1997, which consolidated financial statements are included by reference
into this report, we have also audited the financial statement schedule listed
in Item 99 herein.

In our opinion, this financial statement schedule, when considered in relation
to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents,
fairly, in all material respects, the information required to be included
therein.


                                                   COOPERS & LYBRAND L.L.P.


Tampa, Florida
March 21, 1997


                                     E-21
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

DAVID R. RUIZ,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-1269

[September 17, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit; Edward Harold Merrigan, Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 02-1617CF10A.

Brett S. Chase of Chase Law Florida, P.A., St. Petersburg, for appellant.

No response from appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, FORST, and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.