alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-

.., . "' · " • , -~~E." -ID_:_A58686 ... 

IUB.JBCT: QUcationa t;; Jl&Wnt ~-~--;.L v: ~ L 

-- _,,, 

'l'O: ··------------------------·-·--------~----------------.-.---~-~---~---- AD/Im JRC.: AD/PBal 9 J\111' 56 -- CCllUt ... -~~--~- BO.. 2 

TBRU: DD/C-.C BKt 662/ob 

Oenera1 Cawwel. 

DC8/P•O 

l. .It 1•, or coune, a source or ad41t1cmal riak to aucceutul. ca> erat10ll8 in 

PROD tor the det-11 e4 »&Wilt a.ppl1cat1cma or Mr. a..u. to proceed. and to evell'tuate 

in patenta, especially a1ace "18 U88B 11 Jmovn to be a.cQU1r1Jlg copie• ot pr.tent• 

u • •tand&rd procedure. ... Blllll'• claim., ... J'OL1 point out, go vell be;yan4 the 

:lnf'ormation contained an Bll&el in 386569. 

2. Qi the other band, 1 t aeeM unt&1r that Ill". Saa1.l ahoul.4 be penal 1 zed. by 

the srant1ns d BageUn 386569. Purthermre., the ezi•tence in general. JIATO u.e ot 

the asAll 1 in 1taelt repre•enta a aubatanti&l r1•k to preeiael.J' the pr1Dc1plea 

covered 1n Mr. Small'• application. 

3. '1be weight of argument •eema to tavor tbe nleue ot Ill-. Sm&ll' • tvo 

appUaationa. 'l'he General Counael. might, however, care to addre•• MmMlf to the 

~all.owing que.t.ion: 

a. It the 8D&U applicatiana are releal84, vb&t V1U be the ettect on 

lfagel1Jl 386569? 

b. rr the aau appl1cat:lan• are releaaed, will our agreemeQt with 11r. 

Sm&ll neceall&l"11.y require zw.a•ipmnt to Mr. 8ma1.1.T 

c. Doe• the agreement with II!'. Small pl.ace him 1n a po•1t1on to mlm 

commercial u.e ot his patent• at ODCe1 or 1• the "free license" exclU91ve? 

4. It the Sll8ll applicaticma &\"e hel.4 in thelr preaent •tatu, d.oea llr' .. 

a.11 thereb7 ae~u:l~. lepl. claim tor re1mbur•ement -1n•t. the u.s. Qaverment? 

4. lt 1• nearl;r hopele•• to tr.r to carve out uncla•dtied. portiona at the 

Smll appUcatioD vithOu.t :rew.titilag thm. 1D tbeir ent1NV· .U & •tter ot :tact, 

tbe ~ unc:1 all1t1e4 portions vould .eem to be thoae c1 •'•• in con:tlict v1 th 

Bagel.Sll 3865691 and tbe•e are uncl&aaUiecl only becauae prior public d1•clomure bu 

been -49 by lflpl.1n. 

5. In~· vhile PRCI> voul.4 be md.e IDU'kedly unbapw by the rel_.. o~ the 

Small patent.a, .there •eema to be good reuon to relea1e thm. rt the anawr to 3.d. 

above i• "no," mm ~er• that the application• be hel.4 1n .. creey. Al'tern&tivel;y, 

Ill". Small might be able to Mlect tho•e portions at hi• cW•• vh1ch are 1n contl1ct 

with Bagelin 386569 and are therefore unclu.uted., and to wbatt tbeae cl•1ma tar 

ccma14erat1an tor releue. ICI:'. 811111 1• fUll1' Jmovledgeab1e &bout clu•1ficat1on 

atten and 1• completely tut'kr with bi• own cl.a'••; he would therefore •em to 

be 1n the 1cleal. po•1t1on to ate nch a cliY1•1on. 

' -

• 

A. 8lBOV 

Aaaiatant Director 

Production 

3cfxiJ'~ n/c Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
REF ID:A71791 e _.~4 ~ectat:- ,. 

8 JanU&ry 1954 . MEMORANDUM FOR MR. FRIEJJWf 

SUBJECT: Categories of :RSA Specialties 

l. Capt. Cbestopol, under Mr. T. F. O'Brien, of the Personnol 

Planning Group is handling this project. 

2. It bas been discussed at some length with Ca:pt. Schestopol, 

and with l.t. Col. Booth (War Plans and Disaster Plans). 

,. 3. In these discussions, I have ta.ken the position that the 

proposed list includes :nany critical NBA functions, but that it onits 

:nany general, as well as specific, functions necessary to inpleme :it 

the Agency's Disaster and War Plans. Among these latter functions 

are some belonging to P/P, LOG, and PERS. 

4. It is reconnended that the next committee meeting on this 

subject inclUde among its :menibers some high level people who are well 

qualif'ied in the overall Agency mission and in its Disaster and War 

Plans. 

5. Specific observations on ·th~ list -in~ question are included 

in the attached DF to PERS. 

IJ-. T. fJf./e Ii)~ I. T. McDOHAi.D 

l/Lt., USAF 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 11-07-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
\ 

,\ 

\ 

REF ID:A67457 " : (~) (--~\) ~ 

~ '•.,.." WAR DEPARTMENT ')£: J 

OFFICE OF THE JUDGE• ADVOCATE GENERAL 

Mr. William F. Friedman 

1823 Que Street, N.W. 

Washington 9, D. c. 

Mr. Fru.k B. Rowlett 

216 So. Pershiag DriTe 

Arlington, Virginia· 

Gentlemen a 

WASHINGTdN 25, D.C. 

15 JUL 1947 

By direction ot The Judge AdTooate General, receipt is acknowledged 

ot your letter to the Secretary of ,ar dated 6 June 1947, tendering to 

the GoTermaent of the United Statea for its wse, under the proTiaions 

of the act of.October 6, 1917, as a.aend.ed {35 u.s.c. 42), the iDYention 

desoribed ~d claimed in your applioatioa tor p.tent, Serial lio. 10~•12, 

tiled 2~ Ma.roh 1936, for Ceyptographs, which application and the invention cC>Vered thereby were p1aoe4 in aecreoy by the Commiaa1oner of 

Patents on 19 !fay 1947. It ia noted that your letter iJlcludes a power 

"to inapeot .and make copies of the •pplicatio•• 

The· records of this office sho1r that the abo'Ye-mentioned applioatioa and the iln'ention cOTered thereby are assigned to the Umted States 

GoTenaaent and were tiled Ullder the act of March ~. 1883, as amead.ed 

(36 u.s.c. 4:5). However, the present tender will be :made of record tor 

the protectioa of whatever interes~ 1ou my have in thie im"eatioa. 

Very truly yours, 

~~- Nμ. · G ·RGE W. GARDES . 

· ionel, JA.GD 

Chief, Patents D1visioa 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-09-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

'----------"---------------~-·-----. ---- ---·-·
#### Clermont County Bar Association *v.*Compton.

[Cite as *Clermont Cty. Bar Assn. v. Compton*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 542.]

(No. 99-809

Submitted June 9, 1999

Decided September 8, 1999.)

*543
      *Paul R. Yelton,*for relator.

*Per Curiam.*

We adopt the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the board. “ ‘[W]hen an attorney engages in a course of conduct resulting in a finding that the attorney has violated DR 1-102(A)(4), the attorney will be actually suspended from the practice of law for an appropriate period of time.’ ” *Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Knowlton*(1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 76, 78, 689 N.E.2d 538, 539, quoting *Disciplinary Counsel v. Fowerbaugh*(1995), 74 Ohio St.3d 187, 190, 658 N.E.2d 237, 240. An indefinite suspension is the appropriate sanction here given respondent’s repeated misrepresentations, neglect of a legal matter, and failure to cooperate in the ensuing disciplinary investigation. See *Warren Cty. Bar Assn. v. Lieser*(1997), 79 Ohio St.3d 488, 490, 683 N.E.2d 1148, 1149. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio, and any readmission is conditioned upon his making complete restitution to Pruchnowski. Costs taxed to respondent.

*Judgment accordingly.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
**EXHIBIT 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANT**

 

TheBoard of Directors 

Harbor Bankshares Corporation 

Baltimore,Maryland 

 

We hereby consent to the inclusion of our reportdated January 17, 2004 relating to the balance sheets of Harbor Bankshares Corporation (the “Corporation”) as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows forthe years then ended in the Corporation’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. 

 

**Stegman & Company**

/s/ Stegman & Company 

Baltimore, Maryland 

March 22, 2004
Exhibit 10.5

July 27, 2009

Jeffrey M.
Stamps
100 E. RiverCenter Blvd.
Suite 1600
Covington, KY 41011

Re:     Temporary
Salary Reduction Program

Dear Jeffrey:

As
you know, Omnicare is implementing a temporary salary reduction program. During
the period of Omnicares temporary salary reduction program, your regular base
salary will be reduced by five percent (5%) from its current level. This salary
reduction is retroactive and became effective July 5, 2009. By executing this
letter where indicated below, you acknowledge that you were notified of such
salary reduction prior to such effective date.

The
salary reduction does not constitute a breach of, or a failure by Omnicare or
any of its affiliates to observe or perform any of their obligations under, your
employment agreement with Omnicare, dated June 1, 1999 (the Employment
Agreement) or any other agreement you may have with Omnicare or any of its
affiliates. The salary reduction will have no effect on the validity or
enforceability of any provision of the Employment Agreement or any other
agreement that you may have with Omnicare or any of its affiliates.
Notwithstanding anything in this letter to the contrary, for purposes of
determining (i) the severance payable pursuant to Section 3.4 of the Employment
Agreement, (ii) the amount of compensation under the Rabbi Trust for Deferred
Compensation Arrangements and (iii) your benefits under any other employee
benefit plan of Omnicare or any of its affiliates, your base salary shall be
determined without application of the salary reduction set forth above.

Nothing
in this letter constitutes an admission by Omnicare or any of its affiliates
that your consent is required to reduce your regular base salary under the
terms of the Employment Agreement or otherwise. If and to the extent necessary,
however, this letter modifies the Employment Agreement to reflect the foregoing
temporary salary reduction.

---



Please
execute and return this letter to show your acknowledgment of and agreement to
the foregoing. We appreciate your efforts on behalf of Omnicare.

|                                 |                    
|-------------------------------- | -------------------
|                                 | Sincerely,         
|                                 |                    
|                                 | /s/ Mark G. Kobasuk
|                                 |                    
|                                 | Mark G.
 Kobasuk   
|                                 |                    
|Agreed and
 accepted:            |                    
|                                 |                    
|/s/ Jeffrey
 M. Stamps           |                    
|Employee                         |                    
|Printed
 Name: Jeffrey M. Stamps |                    
|Date: July
 27, 2009             |                    

---
1

 
     ***Section 1. Defined Terms***     Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Credit Agreements or in the SecurityAgreement and used herein have the meaning given to them in the Credit Agreements or the SecurityAgreement.     ***Section 2. Grant of Security Interest in Trademark Collateral***     Each Grantor, as collateral security for the full, prompt and complete payment and performancewhen due (whether at stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise) of the Secured Obligations (asdefined in the Security Agreement) of such Grantor, hereby mortgages, pledges and hypothecates tothe Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Secured Parties (as defined in the Security Agreement),and grants to the Collateral Agent for the benefit of the Secured Parties a lien on and securityinterest in, all of its right, title and interest in, to and under the following Collateral of suchGrantor (the “*Trademark Collateral*”):     (a) all of its Trademarks and Trademark Licenses to which it is a party, including, withoutlimitation, those referred to on *Schedule I*hereto;     (b) all goodwill of the business connected with the use of, and symbolized by, each Trademark;and     (c) all Proceeds of the foregoing, including, without limitation, any claim by Grantor againstthird parties for past, present, future (i) infringement or dilution of any Trademark or Trademarklicensed under any Trademark License or (ii) injury to the goodwill associated with any Trademarkor any Trademark licensed under any Trademark License.     ***Section 3. Security Agreement***     The security interests granted pursuant to this Trademark Security Agreement is granted inconjunction with the security interest granted to the Collateral Agent pursuant to the SecurityAgreement and each Grantor hereby acknowledges and affirms that the rights and remedies of theCollateral Agent with respect to the security interest in the Trademark Collateral made and grantedhereby are more fully set forth in the Security Agreement, the terms and provisions of which areincorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth herein.[Signature Pages Follow]
2

 
     In witness whereof, each Grantor has caused this Trademark Security Agreement to beexecuted and delivered by its duly authorized offer as of the date first set forth above.      CHARLES REVSON INC.,
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Sarah Stewart,

Deputy General Counsel.

[FR Doc. 2015-05633 Filed 3-9-15; 4:15 pm]

 BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: 

APPOINTMENTS TO THE CONTINUING 

LEGAL EDUCATION BOARD

:

:

:

:

:

No. 718

SUPREME COURT RULES

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2016, Dusty Elias Kirk, Esquire, 

Allegheny County, and Jason E. Matzus, Esquire, Allegheny County, are hereby

appointed as members of the Continuing Legal Education Board for a term of three 

years commencing January 1, 2017.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel M. Healy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Daniel M. HealyDaniel M. Healy
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
 May 10, 2005 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided
to North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. and will be retained by North Fork Bancorporation, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 44
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 18, 2016

NO. 03-14-00695-CR

Paul Daniel Campbell, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GOODWIN, AND BOURLAND

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of 

conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs 

is made.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.5



                          Independent Auditors' Consent




The Board of Directors
PLD Asset Leasing Ltd.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement (no.
333-35139) on Form S-8, in the Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (no. 333-18713), in the registration
statement (no. 333-5396) on Form S-3, and in the registration statement (no.
333-5400) on Form S-3 of PLD Telekom Inc. of our report dated May 20, 1998,
relating to the balance sheet of PLD Asset Leasing Ltd. as of December 31, 1997,
and the related statements of operations, shareholder's equity, and cash flows
for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 1997, which
report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1998 of PLD Telekom Inc.




                                                  Moore Stephens
                                                  Chartered Accountants


Nicosia, Cyprus
March 30, 1999
<PAGE>

                                 Exhibit 10.9

Employment Agreement, dated June 27, 1997, between Registrant and T. Wade Fallin

Incorporated by reference to the Company's Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June
30, 1997.
Date; 01-03-2013 To; U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building ground floor, Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590
To whom it may concern,

.. .., Paradigm Helicopters LLC is writing this letterto request an extension to Exemption No. 10275 from CFR (FAR Section:)·- Part 120, Docket No. 10275, which is scheduled to expire 06-30-2013. Your assist'ance

# on this ma'tter is greatly appreciated. ( ··r' • . ·:.:·- Piease.don't hesitate to contact me if I may be ofany assistance.

Chief Pilot, Paradigm Helicopters LLC 1i811

## NBrantly, Suite

### 206~." Houston, TX 77034 877-345-8687 rick@paradigmhelicopters.com
' e e REF ID:A58650 • e 

• 

...1.111111 rm 1 Aa-20 

111.TBC!I :tment10ll Of BOlt aoor1Dg 4ftlee. 

V11UU P. h1edman 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 94-11-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
.. . . 

~ 

.... ' 

e 9REF ID:A58650 --

------------....--.~----~ 

... ..-.=--

-------~---------~ .. ... ----_jllllllll ____ - .... ..._ .. 

------· -·· 

I 

\ 

-- -- .. _ -- ____ ,.._ --- - - ----
--

·e e 

0 
.. . . . 

I 

e 9REF ID:A58650 

.' 

•• 

/
EXHIBIT 99.2



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL
OFFICER



Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)



Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, David N. Keys, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of American Pacific Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the
Company), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:



Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ DAVID N. KEYSDavid N. Keys Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer April 30, 2003




99.2
Order filed November 17, 2016 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-15-00899-CV

____________

LUCILLE R. KELLEY, Appellant

V.

ALDINE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-17475

ORDER

The reporter’s record consists of a one-volume transcript of proceedings held 

July 27, 2015. The transcript reflects one exhibit (the report of Dr. Stephen A. Carter) 

was admitted during those proceedings. The exhibit is not included in the reporter’s 

record. The clerk’s record indicates that the court reporter tendered the original 

exhibit to the district clerk for filing on December 31, 2015. 

Accordingly, the Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a 

supplemental clerk’s record on or before November 30, 2016, containing the exhibit 
2

tendered by the court reporter on December 31, 2015. If the exhibit is not part of the 

case file, the district clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record containing 

a certified statement that the omitted item is not a part of the case file.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 32.3











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Michael R. Burwell, certify that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the partnership at the dates and for the periods indicated.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII and will be retained by Redwood Mortgage Investors VIII and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.