# Patent

## Title
Composition containing a polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene and non-aqueous solvent

## Abstract

A method for preparing a composition containing between 0.08 and 3.0% by weight of a polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene in which said two alkoxy groups may be the same or different or together represent a oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge optionally substituted with substituents selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, alkyoxyalkyl, carboxy, alkylsulphonato, alkyloxyalkylsulphonato and carboxy ester groups, a polyanion and at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent from a dispersion of said polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and said polyanion in water comprising in the following order the steps of: i) mixing at least one of said non-aqueous solvents with said aqueous dispersion of said polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and said polyanion; and ii) evaporating water from the mixture prepared in step i) until the content of water therein is reduced by at least 65% by weight; a printing ink, printing paste or coating composition, capable of yielding layers with an enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance, prepared according to the above-described method; a coating process with the coating composition thereby producing a layer with enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance; and a printing process with the printing ink or paste thereby producing a layer with enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance.

## Background
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/350,453 filed Jan. 22, 2002, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/382,577 filed May 22, 2002, which are herein incorporated by reference.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to method of preparing a composition containing a polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene and non-aqueous solvent.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
U.S. Pat. No. 5,494,609 discloses an electrically conductive coating composition comprising: a dispersion comprising dispersed particle of an intrinsically conductive polymer and, a solution which comprises a hydrophobic film-forming thermoplastic polymer, a highly polar plasticizer, and, an acid anhydride surfactant, in an organic solvent; wherein said thermoplastic polymer is soluble in said solvent to at least 1 percent by weight; and, wherein said dispersion comprises from about 1 to about 50 percent by weight of said intrinsically conductive polymer.
EP-A 440 957 discloses dispersions of polythiophenes, constructed from structural units of formula (I):




in which R1 and R2 independently of one another represent hydrogen or a C1-4-alkyl group or together form an optionally substituted C1-4-alkylene residue, in the presence of polyanions.

EP-A-686 662 discloses mixtures of A) neutral polythiophenes with the repeating structural unit of formula (I),




in which R1 and R2 independently of one another represent hydrogen or a C1-4-alkyl group or together represent an optionally substituted C1-4-alkylene residue, preferably an optionally with alkyl group substituted methylene, an optionally with C1-12-alkyl or phenyl group substituted 1,2-ethylene residue or a 1,2-cyclohexene residue, and B) a di- or polyhydroxy- and/or carboxy groups or amide or lactam group containing organic compound; and conductive coatings therefrom which are tempered to increase their resistance preferably to <300 ohm/square.

WO 99/34371 discloses a screen paste with a viscosity of 1 to 200 dPa·s (102 to 2×10 mPa·s) containing a solution or dispersion of a conductive polymer paste and optionally binders, thickeners and fillers. WO 99/34371 further discloses a process for preparing screen pastes in which a solution or dispersion with a content of <2% by weight of poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) [PEDOT]/poly(styrene sulphonate) [PSS] is concentrated to a solids content of >2% by removing the solvent and in which subsequently binder and/or filler are optionally added. Example 1 discloses evaporation of water from a 1.3% by weight solids dispersion of PEDOT/PSS in water to a 3% by weight solids dispersion in a rotary evaporator at 45° C. and 20 mbar.
EP-A 1 081 549 discloses a coating composition comprising a solution of a substituted or unsubstituted thiophene-containing electrically-conductive polymer, a film-forming binder, and an organic solvent media; the media having a water content of less than 37 weight percent. Coating dispersions with 0.1% by weight of PEDOT/PSS, i.e. 0.0294% by weight of PEDOT since BAYTRON® P contains a weight ratio PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4, and with between 8 and 25% by weight of water were disclosed in the invention examples using BAYTRON® P, a 1.22% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS in water, as the starting material.
EP-A 1 081 546 discloses a coating composition comprising a solution of an electrically-conductive polymer and an organic solvent media wherein the solvents are selected from the group consisting of alcohols, ketones, cycloalkanes, arenes, esters, glycol ethers and their mixtures; the media having a water content of less than 12 weight percent. Coating dispersions with PEDOT/PSS concentrations between 0.02 and 0.1% by weight, i.e. between 0.00588 and 0.0294% by weight of PEDOT since BAYTRON® P contains a weight ratio PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4, and with between 2 and 8% by weight of water were disclosed in the invention examples using BAYTRON® P, a 1.22% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS in water, as the starting material.
EP-A 1 081 548 discloses a coating composition comprising a substituted or unsubstituted thiophene-containing electrically-conductive polymer and an organic solvent media; the media having a water content of less than 12 weight percent. Coating dispersions with PEDOT/PSS concentrations between 0.02 and 0.1% by weight, i.e. between 0.00588 and 0.0294% by weight of PEDOT since BAYTRON® P contains a weight ratio PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4, and with between 2 and 8% by weight of water were disclosed in the invention examples using BAYTRON® P, a 1.22% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS in water, as the starting material.
WO 02/042352 discloses a process for producing a water-dispersible powder essentially consisting of polymer particles T with repeating thiophene units and at least one further polyanionic polymer P characterized in that a dispersion or solution containing said polymer T is mixed with a compound which forms an azeotrope with water, the water is removed by azeotropic distillation and the polymer obtained isolated and dried.
WO 02/067273 discloses a method for exchanging solvent in a mixture comprising water and an optionally substituted polythiophene, the method comprising: a) heating at least one solvent in a vessel under conditions suitable for vaporizing water; b) contacting the heated solvent with the mixture comprising water and optionally substituted polythiophene, the contact being sufficient to remove at least part of the water from the mixture as vapor; and c) exchanging the water removed from the mixture with the solvent.
WO 02/072660 discloses a process for the preparation of dispersions or solutions, containing optionally substituted polythiophenes in organic solvents, characterized in that: a) a with water-miscible organic solvent or a with water-miscible organic solvent mixture is added to an aqueous dispersion or solution containing optionally substituted polythiophenes and b) the water is at least in part removed from the resulting mixtures. WO 02/072660 only exemplifies solvent exchange using N-methyl-pyrrolidinone (NMP) and dimethyl acetamide (DMAC).
WO 02/072714 discloses solutions and/or dispersions of organic semiconductors in a solvent mixture of at least two different organic solvents, characterized in that (A) each of the solvents on its own exhibits a boiling point below 200° C. and a melting point less than or equal to 15° C., (B) at least one of the solvents exhibits a boiling point between 140° C. and 200° C., (C) the solvents used do not contain benzylic CH2- or CH-groups, (D) the solvents used are not benzene derivatives, which contain tertiary butyl substituents or more than two methyl substituents.
For many applications it is desirable that the coating medium of the conductive polymer dispersion be largely non-aqueous to aid surface wettability and reduce the energy requirements for drying. However, to avoid excessive dilution of the conductive polymer, large coating thicknesses and excessive use of solvent, the concentration of conductive polymer should be as high as possible. This can be realized by diluting aqueous dispersions with organic solvents, but this results in extreme dilution of the conductive polymer to 0.00588 to 0.0294% by weight, as disclosed in EP-A 1 081 546, EP-A 1 081 548 and EP-A 1 081 549.
Aspects of the Invention
It is therefore an aspect of the present invention to provide a method of preparing a composition containing concentrations of conductive polymers of at least 0.08% by weight in a largely non-aqueous medium or an aqueous medium with a solvent concentration of at least 30 percent by weight.
It is a further aspect of the present invention to provide a coating composition containing concentrations of conductive polymers of at least 0.08% by weight in a largely non-aqueous medium or an aqueous medium with a solvent concentration of at least 30 percent by weight.
It is also an aspect of the present invention to provide a coating process for coating a composition containing concentrations of conductive polymers of at least 0.08% by weight in a largely non-aqueous medium or an aqueous medium with a solvent concentration of at least 30 percent by weight.
It is also an aspect of the present invention to provide a printing ink or paste containing concentrations of conductive polymers of at least 0.08% by weight in a largely non-aqueous medium or an aqueous medium with a solvent concentration of at least 30 percent by weight.
It is also an aspect of the present invention to provide a printing process for printing a printing ink or paste containing concentrations of conductive polymers of at least 0.08% by weight in a largely non-aqueous medium or an aqueous medium with a solvent concentration of at least 30 percent by weight.
Further aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the description hereinafter.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Evaporation of a 1.2% by weight PEDOT/PSS dispersion in water at 60° C. and a pressure of 50 mbar as disclosed in EXAMPLE 1 of WO 99/34371 only enables 60% of the water to be removed due to the increase in viscosity of the dispersion. Upon two-fold dilution of the resulting very viscous PEDOT/PSS mass, containing 96% by weight of water and 4% by weight of PEDOT/PSS, with a non-aqueous solvent, the resulting paste still contained 50 to 55% by weight of water. Further dilution of the PEDOT/PSS mass to 70 to 85% by weight of non-aqueous solvent produced an inhomogeneous dispersion with a reduced viscosity. Surprisingly it has been found that addition of a polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent to a 1.2% by weight PEDOT/PSS dispersion in water prior to evaporation of the water enabled more than 60% of the water to be removed and more than 99% water removal to be realized without colloidal destabilization of the PEDOT/PSS-latex i.e. flocking and aggregation. Furthermore, it was surprisingly found that the sole use of a non-polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent such as N-methyl-pyrrolidinone (NMP) or carbitol acetate was disadvantageous for layer transparency for layers with a given surface resistance. Furthermore, the sole use of NMP also readily gave rise to lumps and flakes of PEDOT/PSS, which are not readily dispersible.
Aspects of the present invention are realized by a method for preparing a composition containing between 0.08 and 3.0% by weight of a polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene in which said two alkoxy groups may be the same or different or together represent a oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge optionally substituted with substituents selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, alkyoxyalkyl, carboxy, alkylsulphonato, alkyloxyalkylsulphonato and carboxy ester groups, a polyanion and at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent from a dispersion of said polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and said polyanion in water comprising in the following order the steps of: i) mixing at least one of said non-aqueous solvents with said aqueous dispersion of said polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and said polyanion; and ii) evaporating water from the mixture prepared in step i) until the content of water therein is reduced by at least 65% by weight.
Aspects of the present invention are also realized by a coating composition, capable of yielding layers with an enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance, prepared according to the above-described method.
Aspects of the present invention are also realized by a coating process comprising the steps of: providing the above-described coating composition; coating the coating composition on an optionally subbed support, a dielectric layer, a phosphor layer or a transparent conductive layer thereby producing a layer with enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance.
Aspects of the present invention are also realized by a printing ink or paste, capable of yielding layers with an enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance, prepared according to the above-described method.
Aspects of the present invention are also realized by a printing process comprising the steps of: providing the above-described printing ink; printing the printing ink on an optionally subbed support, a dielectric layer, a phosphor layer or a transparent conductive layer thereby producing a layer with enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance.
Preferred embodiments are disclosed in the dependent claims.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
Definitions
The term alkoxy means all variants possible for each number of carbon atoms in the alkoxy group i.e. for three carbon atoms: n-propyl and isopropyl; for four carbon atoms: n-butyl, isobutyl and tertiary-butyl; for five carbon atoms: n-pentyl, 1,1-dimethylpropyl, 2,2-dimethylpropyl and 2-methyl-butyl etc.
The term oxyalkylenealkoxy means two oxygen atoms linked by an alkylene group. An alkylene group is a substituted or unsubstituted hydrocarbon group e.g. a —(CH2)n— group where n is an integer between 1 and 5, which may be substituted with an alkoxy, aryloxy, alkyl, aryl, alkaryl, alkyloxyalkyl, alkyloxyalkaryl, alkyloxyaryl, hydroxy, carboxy, carboxyalkyl, carboxyamino, sulfo or alkylsulfo group.
The term derivatives as used in connection with a particular polymer refers to variants thereof substituted with alkyl, alkoxy, alkyloxyalkyl, carboxy, alkylsulfonato and carboxy ester groups.
The term “non-aqueous solvent” means one or more non-aqueous solvents as opposed to the term “a non-aqueous solvent” which means a single non-aqueous solvent.
The term “polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent” means a non-aqueous solvent having at least two hydroxy groups.
The term azeotrope, otherwise known as azeotropic mixture, as used in the disclosing the present invention means a solution of two or more liquids, the composition of which does not change upon distillation.
The term “enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance” means that the transparency of the coating as measured with a transmission densitometer of a coating obtained with a solvent-exchanged aqueous dispersion of a polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and a polyanion in which at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent is present is higher for the same surface resistance than that obtained with the same aqueous dispersion of a polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and a polyanion solvent exchanged in the absence of a polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent.
The term transparent as used in disclosing the present invention means having the property of transmitting at least 70% of the incident light without diffusing it.
The term translucent as used in disclosing the present invention means allowing the passage of light, yet diffusing it so as not to render bodies lying beyond clearly visible.
The term flexible as used in disclosing the present invention means capable of following the curvature of a curved object such as a drum e.g. without being damaged.
PEDOT as used in the present disclosure represents poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene).
PSS as used in the present disclosure represents poly(styrene sulphonic acid) or poly(styrene sulphonate).
PET as used in the present disclosure represents poly(ethylene terephthalate).
The term screen printing as used in the present disclosure includes all types of printing in which printing is carried out through a screen e.g. silk screen printing.
Method of Preparing a Composition Containing a Polymer or Copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and Non-aqueous Solvent
According to the present invention a method for preparing a composition containing between 0.08 and 3.0% by weight of a polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene in which said two alkoxy groups may be the same or different or together represent a oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge optionally substituted with substituents selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, alkyoxyalkyl, carboxy, alkylsulphonato, alkyloxyalkylsulphonato and carboxy ester groups, a polyanion and at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent from a dispersion of said polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and said polyanion in water comprising in the following order the steps of: i) mixing at least one of said non-aqueous solvents with said aqueous dispersion of said polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and said polyanion; and ii) evaporating water from the mixture prepared in step i) until the content of water therein is reduced by at least 65% by weight.
It has been found that to minimize flocking of the polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene in which the two alkoxy groups may be the same or different or together represent an optionally substituted oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge and polyanion, the evaporation to reduce the water content by at least 65% by weight is best carried out with regular homogenization either on-line in a continuous process or off-line in a discontinuous process. In this way high concentrations of polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene in which the two alkoxy groups may be the same or different or together represent an optionally substituted oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge and polyanion can be realized without a prohibitive rise in viscosity due to flocking of the polymer/polyanion. Otherwise pronounced flocking is observed forming a highly viscous “skin” on the evaporating dispersion, which strongly reduces the evaporation rate of water. This can be regarded as phase separation, although water and the organic liquid may be perfectly miscible in the absence of the polymer or copolymer/polyanion. It is believed that a phase separation may take place during the evaporation into a water-deficient phase in which the polyanion chains are present in coils resulting in flocking and a water-rich phase in which the polyanion chains are extended.
According to a first embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the method further comprises the step of homogenization of the dispersion prepared in step (i) at least once during step (ii).
According to a second embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the method further comprises the step of homogenization of the dispersion prepared in step (i) at least twice during step (ii).
According to a third embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, step i) further comprises mixing the non-aqueous solvent and the aqueous dispersion of the polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and the polyanion with an organic liquid which forms an azeotrope with water. This enables the water to be evaporated off more rapidly. Ethanol, isopropanol, n-propanol, n-butanol, sec-butanol, methylisobutylketone, ethyl acetate and are all examples of organic liquids, which form binary azeotropes with water. n-Butanol, for example, enables water contents below 5% by weight to be easily achieved.
According to a fourth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention the ratio by weight of polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) to polyanion in the dispersion is in the range of 1:2.0 to 1:6.0.
According to a fifth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the water in the mixture from step i) is reduced by at least 70% by weight.
According to a sixth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the water in the mixture from step i) is reduced by at least 80% by weight.
According to a seventh embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the water in the mixture from step i) is reduced by at least 90% by weight.
According to an eighth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the water in the mixture from step i) is reduced by at least 95% by weight.
According to a ninth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the water in the mixture from step i) is reduced by at least 99% by weight.
According to a tenth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, at least 30% by weight of the composition is non-aqueous solvent.
According to an eleventh embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, at least 65% by weight of the composition is non-aqueous solvent.
According to a twelfth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, 80% by weight of composition is non-aqueous solvent.
According to a thirteenth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the composition contains between 0.15 and 2.5% by weight of polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene.
According to a fourteenth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the composition contains between 0.2 and 1.6% by weight of polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene.
According to a fifteenth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the composition contains between 0.2 and 0.8% by weight of polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene.
According to a sixteenth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the composition contains between 0.2 and 0.4% by weight of polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene.
A poly(3,4-ethylenedioxy thiophene) [PEDOT]/poly(styrene sulphonate) [PSS] dispersion prepared according to the process of EP 440 957 typically has a pH of about 1.9. The pH of the dispersion can be varied between 1.2 and 3.2 without adversely affecting the properties of compositions prepared according to the present invention.
In general the degree to which water can be removed in the process, according to the present invention, will depend upon the ability of the water to diffuse through the dispersion to the surface, which is dependent upon the viscosity of the PEDOT/PSS-dispersion under the evaporation conditions. However, the viscosity of PEDOT/PSS-dispersions is strongly dependent upon the PEDOT/PSS-content in the final dispersion. Water-contents of 1 to 5% by weight can be easily realized with dispersions of 0.8% by weight PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4, but just increasing the content of PEDOT/PSS, with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4, to 1.0% by weight has such a strong influence on the viscosity of the dispersion that the easily realizable water-content increases to 10 to 15% by weight.
It is preferred that the temperature at which the distillation is carried out a temperature at or below 80° C., particularly preferably at or below 70° C. Distillation at a temperature of 88–89° C. has been found to yield a PEDOT/PSS-dispersion, which upon working up to a screen printing paste gives prints with a significantly higher surface resistance.
It should be pointed out that the viscoelastic properties of the PEDOT/PSS-dispersions obtained with the method, according to the present invention, are stable upon storage under ambient conditions.
Polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene
According to a seventeenth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) has the formula




in which, each of R1 and R2 independently represents hydrogen or a C1-5-alkyl group or together represent an optionally substituted C1-5 alkylene group or a cycloalkylene group.

According to an eighteenth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) is a polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) in which the two alkoxy groups together represent an optionally substituted oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge.
According to a nineteenth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the polymers or copolymers of a (3,4-dialkoxy-thiophenes) are polymers or copolymers of a (3,4-dialkoxy-thiophenes) in which the two alkoxy groups together represent an optionally substituted oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge are selected from the group consisting of: poly(3,4-methylenedioxythiophene), poly(3,4-methylenedioxythiophene) derivatives, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) derivatives, poly(3,4-propylenedioxythiophene), poly(3,4-propylenedioxythiophene) derivatives, poly(3,4-butylenedioxythiophene) and poly(3,4-butylenedioxythiophene) derivatives and copolymers thereof.
According to a twentieth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the polymers or copolymers of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophenes), the substituents for the oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge are alkyl, alkoxy, alkyloxyalkyl, carboxy, alkylsulphonato, alkyloxyalkylsulphonato and carboxy ester groups.
According to a twenty-first embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, in the poly(3,4-dialkoxythiophenes) the two alkoxy groups together represent an optionally substituted oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge which is a 1,2-ethylene group, an optionally alkyl-substituted methylene group, an optionally C1-12-alkyl- or phenyl-substituted 1,2-ethylene group, a 1,3-propylene group or a 1,2-cyclohexylene group.
Such polymers are disclosed in Handbook of Oligo- and Polythiophenes Edited by D. Fichou, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (1999); by L. Groenendaal et al. in Advanced Materials, volume 12, pages 481–494 (2000); L. J. Kloeppner et al. in Polymer Preprints, volume 40(2), page 792 (1999); P. Schottland et al. in Synthetic Metals, volume 101, pages 7–8 (1999); and D. M. Welsh et al. in Polymer Preprints, volume 38(2), page 320 (1997).
Polyanion
According to a twenty-second embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, polyanions include the polyanions of polymeric carboxylic acids, e.g. polyacrylic acids, polymethacrylic acids, or polymaleic acids, and polysulphonic acids, e.g. poly(styrene sulphonic acid). These polycarboxylic acids and polysulphonic acids can also be copolymers of vinylcarboxylic acids and vinylsulphonic acids with other polymerizable monomers, e.g. acrylic acid esters, methacrylic acid esters and styrene.
According to a twenty-third embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the polyanion is a polyanion of poly(styrenesulphonic acid) or of a copolymer of poly(styrene sulphonic acid) with styrene.
According to a twenty-fourth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the molar ratio of polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene, in which the two alkoxy groups may be the same or different or together represent an optionally substituted oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge, to polyanion is in the range of 1:0.95 to 1:6.5.
According to a twenty-fifth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the molar ratio of polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene, in which the two alkoxy groups may be the same or different or together represent an optionally substituted oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge, to polyanion is in the range of 1:0.95 to 1:3.0.
Non-aqueous Solvents
According to a twenty-sixth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the non-aqueous solvent is incapable of forming an azeotrope with water.
According to a twenty-seventh embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent is exclusive of sugar alcohols and ethylene glycol and is preferably water miscible.
According to a twenty-eighth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, the at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, propandiol, glycerol, diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol.
According to a twenty-ninth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, wherein non-aqueous solvent is added in a further process step for example alcohols, ketones, arenes, esters, ethers, and their mixtures.
According to a thirtieth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, wherein non-aqueous solvent is added in a further process step and said further added non-aqueous solvent is a di- or polyhydroxy- and/or carboxy groups or amide or lactam group containing organic compound for example sugar alcohols, such as sorbitol, mannitol, saccharose and fructose, diethylene glycol, 1,2-propandiol and propylene glycol.
According to a thirty-first embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, wherein non-aqueous solvent is added in a further process step and said further added non-aqueous solvent is selected from the group consisting of 1,2-propandiol, propylene glycol, diethylene glycol, N,N-dimethylformamide, N-methylacetamide, glycerol, hexylene glycol and carbitol acetate.
The suitability of particular non-aqueous solvents can be evaluated by mixing 8 g of a 1.2% by weight aqueous dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with 12 g of solvent. If miscibility is observed without gel formation, the non-aqueous solvent is regarded as suitable. Tetrahydrofuran is miscible, but the dispersions are very viscous. Suitability according to the above miscibility test does not rule out phase separation upon further dilution of the PEDOT/PSS-dispersion with the same solvent, as is observed with tetrahydrofuran. It will be understood by one skilled in the art that a PEDOT/PSS-dispersion cannot be diluted to an unlimited extent without the possibility of phase separation.
Ethyl lactate induces gel-formation and hence is unsuitable. Benzyl alcohol, furfuryl alcohol and cyclohexane produced phase separation and hence are unsuitable.
Binders
According to a thirty-second embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, a binder is added in a further process step. This binder binds together the ingredients of the antistatic or electroconductive layer produced with the composition according to the present invention such that a non-planar structure on a support can be better coated. This binder may also increase the viscosity of the composition produced according to the method of the present invention.
According to a thirty-third embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, a binder is added in a further process step, wherein the binder is a polyester urethane copolymer e.g. DISPERCOLL U VP KA 8481 from BAYER.
According to a thirty-fourth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, a binder is added in a further process step, wherein the binder is selected from the group consisting polyacrylates, carboxymethylcellulose, polyvinylpyrrolidone, hydroxypropylcellulose, carboxylate-containing copolymers with sulfonic acid groups, hydroxy-modified acrylic acid copolymers and poly(vinyl alcohol).
The suitability of binders was assessed by adding 0.1% by weight of the particular binder to a typical dispersion medium for the PEDOT/PSS-containing compositions of the present invention such as 87% by weight of 1,2-propandiol, 9% by weight of diethylene glycol, 3% by weight of deionized water, 0.5% by weight of ZONYL® FSO and 0.5% by weight of silicone antifoam agent X50860A. A binder which dissolved in such a dispersion medium to the extent of 0.1% by weight was regarded as suitable for the compositions according to the present invention.
Particularly suitable binders are:













binder 01 =
CARBOPOL ® ETD-2623, a homo- and copolymers of



acrylic acid crosslinked with a polyalkenyl



polyether, from B. F. Goodrich;


binder 02 =
CARBOPOL ® Aqua 30, a latex of a copolymer of



acrylic acid and ethyl acrylate from B. F.



Goodrich;


binder 03 =
AMBERGUM ® 3021, a carboxymethylcellulose from



Hercules Inc.;


binder 04 =
LUVISKOL ® K30, a polyvinyl pyrrolidone from BASF;


binder 05 =
a hydroxyalkyl cellulose methylpropylether from



Shin-Etsu Chemical Company;


binder 06 =
KLUCEL ® L, hydroxypropylcellulose from Hercules



Inc.;


binder 07 =
NEOCRYL ® BT24, an acrylate-based aqueous latex from



Zenica;


binder 08 =
AQUACER ® 503, an acrylate-based aqueous latex from



BYC Cera;


binder 09 =
POLYPHOBE ® TR117, an acrylate-based aqueous latex



from Union Carbide;


binder 10 =
AMOREX ® CR2900, an acrylate-based aqueous latex



from Westvaco Corporation;


binder 11 =
CRX-8057-45, an acrylate-based aqueous latex from



Westvaco Corporation;


binder 12 =
PRIMAL TM EP-5380, a 54% by weight acrylate-based



aqueous latex from Rohm and Haas;


binder 13 =
JAGOTEX ® KEM1020, a 58% by weight acrylate-based



aqueous latex from Ernst Jager Chem. Rohstoffe



GmbH;


binder 14 =
PERMUTEX ® PS-34 = 320, a 54% by weight acrylate-



based aqueous latex from Stahl Holland BV;


binder 15 =
JAGOTEX ® KEM4009, a 55% by weight acrylate



copolymer aqueous latex from Ernst Jager Chem.



Rohstoffe GmbH;


binder 16 =
GOOD RITE ® K797, a 50% by weight acrylic acid-



AMPS copolymer aqueous latex from B. F. Goodrich;


binder 17 =
GOOD RITE ® K-7058, a 50% by weight water-soluble



acrylic acid polymer from B. F. Goodrich;


binder 18 =
NARLEX ® DX2020, an acrylic acid/styrene copolymer



latex from Alco Chemical;


binder 19 =
ALCOPERSE ® 725, an acrylic acid/styrene copolymer



latex from Alco Chemical;


binder 20 =
CARBOPOL ® EP2, a 18.1% by weight non-crosslinked



methacrylate acid/ethyl acrylate copolymer latex



from B. F. Goodrich


binder 21 =
97.5–99.5% hydrolyzed poly(vinyl alcohol) from



WACKER CHEMIE.


binder 22 =
DISPERCOLL TM U VP KA 8481, a polyester urethane



copolymer dispersion from BAYER









Binders 1, 2 and 20 have a very strong influence upon the viscosity of the dispersion independent of the PEDOT/PSS-content.

Pigments and Dyes
According to a thirty-fifth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, a pigment or dye is added in a further process step to provide coloured or non-transparent compositions. Transparent coloured compositions can be realized by incorporating coloured dyes or pigments e.g. diazo and phthalocyanine pigments.
Non-transparent compositions can also be realized by incorporating a black pigment such as LEVANYL® A-SF from BAYER, LEVANYL® NLF from BAYER, KL1925, a carbon black dispersion from Degussa, and MHI Black 8102M, a carbon black dispersion from Mikuni, or titanium dioxide pigments in a weight sufficient to give non-transparency in the layer thickness being coated.
Suitable pigments are:












Pig-

Manu-


ment nr.
Pigment
facturer


















PIG01
FLEXON-YL ®BlueB2G
CLARI-ANT






 


PIG02
LEVAN-YL ®YellowHRLP
BAYER






 


PIG03
NOVO-PERM ®YellowHR02
CLARI-ANT






 


PIG04
LEVAN-YL ®Blue G-LF
BAYER






 


PIG05
HOSTA-PERM ®Blue B2G
CLARI-ANT






 


PIG06
HOSTA-PERM ®Blue B2G-L
CLARI-ANT






 


PIG07
LEVAN-
BAYER
a carbon black pigment



YL ®



NLF


PIG08
LEVAN-
BAYER
a carbon black pigment



YL ®



A-SF


PIG09
MHI 8102M
DE-
a carbon black pigment




GUSSA









Crosslinking Agents
According to a thirty-sixth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, a cross-linking agent is added in a further process step. Suitable cross-linking agents are epoxysilane (e.g 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane), hydrolysis products of silanes (e.g. hydrolysis products of tetraethyoxysilane or tetramethoxy-silane) as disclosed in EP 564 911, herein incorporated by reference, and di- or oligo-isocyanates optionally in blocked form.
Anti-foaming Agents
According to a thirty-seventh embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, an anti-foaming agent is added.
A suitable anti-foaming agent is the silicone antifoam agent X50860A.
Surfactants
According to a thirty-eighth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, a surfactant is added.
According to a thirty-ninth embodiment of the method, according to the present invention, an anionic surfactant is added.
According to a fortieth embodiment of the method, according to the method of the present invention a non-ionic surfactant is added e.g. ethoxylated/fluroralkyl surfactants, polyethoxylated silicone surfactants, polysiloxane/polyether surfactants, ammonium salts of perfluro-alkylcarboxylic acids, polyethoxylated surfactants and fluorine-containing surfactants.
Suitable non-ionic surfactants are:













Surfactant no. 01 =
ZONYL ® FSN, a 40% by weight solution of



F(CF2CF2)1–9CH2CH2O(CH2CH2O)xH in a 50% by weight



solution of isopropanol in water where x  = 0 to



about 25, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 02 =
ZONYL ® FSN-100: F(CF2CF2)1–9CH2CH2O(CH2CH2O)xH



where x = 0 to about 25, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 03 =
ZONYL ® FS300, a 40% by weight aqueous solution



of a fluorinated surfactant, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 04 =
ZONYL ® FSO, a 50% by weight solution of a



mixture of ethoxylated non-ionic fluoro-



surfactant with the formula:



F(CF2CF2)1–7CH2CH2O(CH2CH2O)yH where y = 0 to ca.



15 in a 50% by weight solution of ethylene



glycol in water, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 05 =
ZONYL ® FSO-100, a mixture of ethoxylated non-



ionic fluoro-surfactant from DuPont with the



formula: F(CF2CF2)1–7CH2CH2O(CH2CH2O)yH where y =



0 to ca. 15 from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 06 =
Tegoglide ® 410, a polysiloxane-polymer copolymer



surfactant, from Goldschmidt;


Surfactant no. 07 =
Tegowet ®, a polysiloxane-polyester copolymer



surfactant, from Goldschmidt;


Surfactant no. 08 =
FLUORAD ®FC431: CF3(CF2)7SO2(C2H5)N—CH2CO—



(OCH2CH2)nOH from 3M;


Surfactant no. 09 =
FLUORAD ®FC126, a mixture of the ammonium salts



of perfluorocarboxylic acids, from 3M;


Surfactant no. 10 =
Polyoxyethylene-10-lauryl ether


Surfactant no. 11 =
FLUORAD ®FC430, a 98.5% active fluoroaliphatic



ester from 3M;









Suitable anionic surfactants are:














Surfactant no. 12 =
ZONYL ® 7950, a fluorinated surfactant, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 13 =
ZONYL ® FSA, 25% by weight solution of



F(CF2CF2)1–9CH2CH2SCH2CH2COOLi in a 50% by weight solution



of isopropanol in water, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 14 =
ZONYL ® FSE, a 14% by weight solution of



[F(CF2CF2)1–7CH2CH2O]xP(O) (ONH4)y where x = 1 or



2; y = 2 or 1; and x + y = 3 in a 70% by weight



solution of ethylene glycol in water, from



DuPont;


Surfactant no. 15 =
ZONYL ® FSJ, a 40% by weight solution of a blend



of F(CF2CF2)1–7CH2CH2O]xP(O) (ONH4)y where x = 1 or



2; y = 2 or 1; and x + y = 3 with a hydrocarbon



surfactant in 25% by weight solution of



isopropanol in water, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 16 =
ZONYL ® FSP, a 35% by weight solution of



[F(CF2CF2)1–7CH2CH2O]xP(O) (ONH4)y where x = 1 or



2; y = 2 or 1 and x + y = 3 in 69.2% by weight



solution of isopropanol in water, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 17 =
ZONYL ® UR: [F(CF2CF2)1–7CH2CH2O]xP(O) (OH)y where



x = 1 or 2; y = 2 or 1 and x + y = 3, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 18 =
ZONYL ® TBS: a 33% by weight solution of



F(CF2CF2)3–8CH2CH2SO3H in a 4.5% by weight



solution of acetic acid in water, from DuPont;


Surfactant no. 19 =
ammonium salt of perfluoro-octanoic acid;









Printing Ink or Paste
According to a first embodiment of the printing ink or paste according to the present invention, the printing ink or paste is a lithographic printing ink, a gravure printing ink, a flexographic printing ink, a screen printing ink, an ink-jet printing ink or an offset printing ink. The suitability of a composition, produced according to the method of the present invention, for a particular printing process is substantially determined by the viscosity of the composition.
Lithographic inks have a viscosity under printing conditions which varies from about 15 Pa·s to 35 Pa·s depending on the ink formulation, drying mechanism, printing machine and speed of printing.
Gravure and flexographic inks vary greatly, depending on whether one considers the viscosity of the inks in the can or the diluted inks on the printing press. In addition, dye-based inks tend to be of lower viscosity than pigmented inks, owing to pigment settling problems both in the can and on the printing press. As a general guide, a typical press-ink viscosity while being printed would be around 15 mPa·s.
Screen printing inks depend on the type of ink, screen mesh and printing speed. Typical viscosities of the diluted ink while being printed from the screen are between 0.5 and 5 Pa·s for rapid processing (shear rate=ca. 100 s−1) and 8 to 40 Pa·s for slow processing (shear rate=ca. 1 s−1) and 50 to 800 Pa·s at rest (shear rate=ca. 10−2 s−1).
Ink-jet inks have viscosities under printing conditions which vary from about 2 mPa·s to 20 mPa·s depending on the type of ink-jet process, nozzle construction, printing speed, ink-drying mechanism and print quality required.
Printing Process
Aspects of the present invention are realized by a printing process comprising the steps of: providing a printing ink or paste according to the present invention; printing the printing ink or paste on an optionally subbed support, a dielectric layer, a phosphor layer or a transparent conductive layer.
Layers of the pastes exhibit excellent adhesion to phosphor layers, polyacrylate subbing layers, polycarbonate and polyesters e.g. poly(ethylene terephthalate) and surface resistances ≦1000 Ω/square at visual light transmissions >75%, with ≧85% being obtainable.
Among the electroluminescent phosphors to which the printing ink or paste can be applied are II-VI semiconductors e.g. ZnS, or are a combination of group II elements with oxidic anions, the most common being silicates, phosphates, carbonates, germanates, stannates, borates, vanadates, tungstates and oxysulphates. Typical dopants are metals and all the rare earths e.g. Cu, Ag, Mn, Eu, Sm, Tb and Ce. The electroluminescent phosphor may be encapsulated with a transparent barrier layer against moisture e.g. Al2O3 and AlN. Such phosphors are available from Sylvania, Shinetsu polymer K K, Durel, Acheson and Toshiba. An example of coatings with such phosphors is 72x, available from Sylvania/GTE, and coatings disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,855,189. Suitable electroluminescent phosphors are ZnS doped with manganese, copper or terbium, CaGa2S4 doped with cerium, electroluminescent phosphor pastes supplied by DuPont e.g.: Luxprint® type 7138J, a white phosphor; Lux print® type 7151J, a green-blue phosphor; and Luxprint® type 7174J, a yellow-green phosphor; and Electrodag® EL-035A supplied by Acheson. A particularly preferred electroluminescent phosphor is a zinc sulphide phosphor doped with manganese and encapsulated with AlN.
Any dielectric material may be used, with yttria and barium titanate being preferred e.g. the barium titanate paste Luxprint® type 7153E high K dielectric insulator supplied by DuPont and the barium titanate paste Electrodag® EL-040 supplied by Acheson.
According to a first embodiment of the printing process according to the present invention, the printing process is a process for producing an electroluminescent device comprising the steps of: (i) printing a transparent or translucent support with a printing ink or paste according to the present invention, to produce the transparent or translucent first conductive layer; (ii) printing the first conductive layer with a layer comprising an electroluminescent phosphor; (iii) optionally printing the layer comprising an electroluminescent phosphor with a dielectric layer; and (iv) printing the dielectric layer if present, or the layer comprising the electroluminescent phosphor if no dielectric layer is present, with a solution, dispersion or paste comprising a polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) to produce the second conductive layer, wherein the polymer or copolymer of the (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) in the solution, dispersion or paste used in step (i) may be the same or different from the polymer or copolymer of the (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) used in the solution, dispersion or paste used in step (iv).
According to a second embodiment of the printing process according to the present invention, the printing process is a process for producing an electroluminescent device comprising the steps of: (i) printing a support with a printing ink or paste according to the present invention to produce the second conductive layer; (ii) optionally printing the second conductive layer with a dielectric layer; (iii) printing the dielectric layer if present, or the second conductive layer if no dielectric layer is present, with a layer comprising an electroluminescent phosphor; and (iv) printing the electroluminescent phosphor layer with a transparent solution, dispersion or paste comprising a polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) to produce the transparent or translucent first conductive layer, wherein the polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) in the solution, dispersion or paste used in step (i) may be the same or different from the polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) in the transparent solution, dispersion or paste used in step (iv).
Coating Process
Aspects of the present invention are realized by a coating process comprising the steps of: providing a coating composition according to the above-described process; coating the coating composition on an optionally subbed support, a dielectric layer, a phosphor layer or a transparent conductive layer thereby producing a layer with enhanced transparency at a given surface resistance.
Transparent or Translucent Support
According to a first embodiment of the coating process or third embodiment of the printing process, according to the present invention, the support is paper, polymer film, glass or ceramic.
According to a second embodiment of the coating process or a fourth embodiment of the printing process, according to the present invention, the support is a transparent or translucent polymer film. A transparent or translucent support suitable for use in the electroluminescent device of the present invention may be rigid or flexible and consist of a glass, a glass-polymer laminate, a polymer laminate, a thermoplastic polymer or a duroplastic polymer. Examples of thin flexible supports are those made of a cellulose ester, cellulose triacetate, polypropylene, polycarbonate or polyester, with poly(ethylene terephthalate) or poly(ethylene naphthalene-1,4-dicarboxylate) being particularly preferred.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICATION
The coating composition, printing ink and printing paste according to the present invention can, for example, be used to apply antistatic or electroconductive coatings to an optionally subbed support, a dielectric layer, a phosphor layer or a transparent conductive layer. This can, for example, be a step in the production of electroluminescent devices which can be used in lamps, displays, back-lights e.g. LCD, automobile dashboard and keyswitch backlighting, emergency lighting, cellular phones, personal digital assistants, home electronics, indicator lamps and other applications in which light emission is required.
The invention is illustrated hereinafter by way of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES and INVENTION EXAMPLES. The percentages and ratios given in these examples are by weight unless otherwise indicated.
The following supports were used in the COMPARATIVE and INVENTION EXAMPLES:

    
    
        AUTOSTAT®=a 175 μm thick heat-stabilized poly(ethylene terephthalate) [PET] subbed on both sides supplied by AUTOTYPE INTERNATIONAL LTD;
        100 μm thick heat-stabilized PET coated with subbing layer nr. 01;
        100 μm thick heat-stabilized PET coated with subbing layer nr. 02;
        100 μm thick heat-stabilized PET without a subbing layer;
        MAKROFOL® DE 1-1 SC=a 125 μm polycarbonate film from BAYER AG;
        BAYFOL® CR 1-4=a 115 μm thick extruded film of a blend of polycarbonate and, poly(butylene terephthalate) from BAYER AG.
    
    


Subbing layer Nr. 01 has the composition:













copolymer of 88% vinylidene chloride, 10% methyl acrylate and
79.1%


2% itaconic acid


Kieselsol ® 100F, a colloidal silica from BAYER
18.6%


Mersolat ® H, a surfactant from BAYER
0.4%


Ultravon ® W, a surfactant from CIBA-GEIGY
1.9%









Subbing layer Nr. 02 has the composition:













copolymer of 50 mol % ethylene glycol, 26.5 mol % terephthalic
77.2%


acid, 20 mol % isophthalic acid, 3.45 mol % sulfoisophthalic


acid and 0.05 mol % of


 








 


copolymer of 20% ethyl acrylate and 80% methacrylic acid
5.8%


Hordamer ® PE02, aqueous dispersion of polyethylene from
2.4%


HOECHST


PAREZ RESIN ® 707, a melamine-formaldehyde resin from
14.6%


AMERICAN CYANAMID









The following layers were used in the COMPARATIVE and INVENTION EXAMPLES:

    
    
        a layer of LUXPRINTTM 7153E (a high K dielectric insulator) screen printed through a P55 screen;
        a layer of LUXPRINTTM 7138J (a white phosphor) screen printed through a P55 screen.
    
    


The following ingredients not mentioned above were used in the compositions of the COMPARATIVE and INVENTION EXAMPLES:

    
    
        non-aqueous solvents:
        
            CA=carbitol acetate [di(ethyleneglycol) ethyl ether acetate]
            DEG=diethylene glycol
            NMP=N-methylpyrrolidinone
            PD=1,2-propandiol (propylene glycol)
        
        
        X50860A=silicone antifoam agent X50860A from Shin-Etsu
    
    


The starting material for the preparation of the PEDOT pastes described in the INVENTION EXAMPLES was a 1.2% by weight aqueous dispersion of PEDOT/PSS containing a weight ratio PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 prepared as disclosed in EP-A 440 957 and having a typical viscosity measured using an AR1000 plate and cone rheometer (diameter 4 cm; cone angle 2°) at 20° C. of 38 mPa·s at a shear rate of 5 s−1 decreasing to 33.5 mPa·s at a shear rate of 35 s−1 and has a typical pH of 1.9.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1 to 4 and INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 10
The compositions of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1 to 4 and INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 10 were prepared by mixing the solvent given in Table 1 in the quantity also given in Table 1 to the quantity of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water given in Table 1 and evaporating with stirring from the resulting mixtures by distillation at 45° C. at a vacuum of 50 mbar giving the compositions also given in Table 1.
The particle size of the PEDOT/PSS-latex particles in the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 4 was determined with a Chemical Process Specialists CPS DCP24000 Disc Centrifuge in which particle size distributions are determined using differential centrifugal sedimentation. Particles settle in a fluid under centrifugal field according to Stokes' Law. Sedimentation velocity increases as the square of the particle diameter, so particles that differ in size by only a few percent settle at significantly different rates. In differential sedimentation, all the particles in a sample begin sedimentation as a thin band. A sample of particles was produced by diluting 1 mL of the composition with 4 mL of 1,2-propandiol and then diluting the resulting mixture with 10 mL of deionized water and then further with 3 mL of ethanol. 0.1 mL of the resulting dispersion was then added to the top of the 9.5 mL of clear liquid consisting of a 8% aqueous solution of sucrose at the start of the analysis and the particles settled down in the centrifugal field. The detector initially read maximum intensity, but the signal was reduced when particles reached the detector beam. The reduction in intensity indicated the concentration of particles in the detector beam. When a monochromatic light source is used, The theory light scattering can be applied to the intensity data to calculate the particle concentration. When all the particles had passed the detector, the signal returned to the original level. A plot of the particle concentration against the calculated particle diameter provided a differential distribution.










TABLE 1









mixture before dewatering













1.2 wt %
(final) composition














non-aqueous
PEDOT/

non-aqueous

viscosity



solvent
PSS
PEDOT/
solvent

in Pa · s at

















quantity
dispersion
PSS

quantity
water
shear rate



type
[g]
in water
[wt %]
type
[wt. %]
[wt %]
of 1 s−1



















Compar-










ative


example


nr


1
NMP
70
700
3.28
NMP
23.72
73
100–300


2
NMP
70
700
3.64
NMP
28.91
67.45
200


3
CA
70
700
3.23
CA
23.77
73
100


4
CA
70
700
5.35
CA
42.59
52.06
4000


Invention


example


nr


1
NMP + DEG
50 + 15  
500
4.0
NMP + DEG
43.3*
53.3*
very










viscous


2
DEG
400
400
1.006
DEG
84
15
10


3
PD
400
400
1.03
PD
84.97
14.0
15


4
PD
400
400
1.09
PD
89.91
9.0
—


5
PD + DEG
400 + 61.35
400
0.92
PD + DEG
74.98 + 11.5
12.6
16


6
PD + DEG
400 + 54.32
400
0.98
PD + DEG
81.0 + 11 
7.02
—


7
DEG
300
300
1.09
DEG
87.91
11
—


8
DEG
200
400
1.62
DEG
65.38
33
50


9
DEG
200
400
1.66
DEG
68.84
29.5
70


10 
DEG
200
400
1.65
DEG
67.35
31
150





*theoretical






a mean latex particle size of 223 nm was found with a d10 of 223 nm and a d90 of 461 nm for the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 4.
The content of PEDOT in these compositions, obtained by dividing the content of PEDOT/PSS by 3.4, varied between 0.27 and 1.57% by weight. The viscosities at 20° C. and a shear rate of 1 s−1 were determined using an AR1000 plate and cone rheometer (diameter 4 cm; cone angle 2°) and are also given in Table 1.
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 8 and 10 and COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3 were screen printed though the screen given in Table 2 onto a PET film provided with the subbing layer also given in Table 2 and the print dried at 120° C. for 240 s.
The optical density of the print was determined using a MacBeth TR924 densitometer in transmission with blue, green, red and visible filters. The results are summarized in Table 2.
The surface resistance of the print was measured by contacting the printed layer with parallel copper electrodes each 35 mm long and 35 mm apart capable of forming line contacts, the electrodes being separated by a TEFLON® insulator. This enabled a direct measurement of the surface resistance to be realized. The results are also summarized in Table 2.















TABLE 2













Surface




subbing




resistance



Screen
layer no
Dblue
Dgreen
Dred
Dvis
[Ω/square]























Comparative









example nr


 1
P59
1
0.19
0.23
0.28
0.25
210


10
P59
1
0.13
0.16
0.21
0.17
460


Invention


example nr


 1
P120
1
0.09
0.12
0.16
0.14
210


2A
P77
1
0.05
0.07
0.10
0.08
500


2B
P77
2
0.05
0.06
0.10
0.07
570


 3
P77
1
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.07
560


 4
P77
2
0.05
0.08
0.11
0.08
580


 5
P77
1
0.04
0.06
0.09
0.07
710


 6
P77
2
0.05
0.06
0.08
0.06
940


 7
P59
1
0.06
0.08
0.11
0.09
460


 8
P59
1
0.08
0.09
0.12
0.10
1150


10
P77
1
0.06
0.08
0.11
0.09
1340









Coatings prepared with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 10 exhibited excellent transparency, a transparency which increased with increasing surface resistance of the layer. However, the coating prepared with the compositions of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 1 and 3 exhibited a much lower transparency i.e. a Dvis of 0.25 at a surface resistance of 210 Ω/square for COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 1, whereas the coating prepared with composition 1 had a identical surface resistance, but at a much higher transparency of Dvis=0.14; and a Dred of 0.21 at a surface resistance of 460 Ω/square for COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3, whereas the coating prepared with composition 7 had an identical surface resistance, but a much high transparency of Dred=0.11. This indicates that the use of N-methyl-pyrrolidinone (NMP) or carbitol acetate as the sole non-aqueous liquid is disadvantageous for layer transparency. Furthermore, the sole use of NMP also readily gives rise to lumps and flakes of PEDOT/PSS, which are not readily dispersible. This is not the case for polyol liquids such as ethylene glycol, the propandiols, diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol.
INVENTION EXAMPLES 16 and 17
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 16 and 17 were prepared by adding 400 g of diethylene glycol (DEG) to 400 g of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water and then evaporating the resulting mixtures in a rotary evaporator at 60° C. and a vacuum of 50 mbar giving the composition in Table 3.










TABLE 3







INVENTION




EXAMPLE 16
INVENTION EXAMPLE 17


















wt % PEDOT
0.315
0.307


wt % PEDOT/PSS
1.07
1.045


wt. % DEG
87.93
83.955


wt % deionized water
11.00
15.00









The viscosities at 20° C. of compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLE 13 and a 1.2 wt.% dispersion of PEDOT/PSS in water were measured with increasing shear rate and the results are given for particular shear rates in Table 4.
This composition can be used directly for coating or different ingredients may be added to produce non-aqueous solvent containing printing inks and pastes for different printing techniques.









TABLE 4









viscosity [Pa · s]









Shear rate
1.2 wt. % dispersion of
Composition of INVENTION


[s−1]
PEDOT/PSS in water
EXAMPLE 17












0.10
0.142
49.20


0.50
0.066
14.74


1.00
0.076
8.962


5.01
0.079
3.251


10.00
0.073
2.227


50.12
0.060
1.032


100.00
0.053
0.761


500.00
0.037
0.376









The composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 17 without added ingredients was screen printed through different screens onto unsubbed PET and dried at 120° C. for 120 s. These prints were characterized as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14 and the results obtained are given in Table 5.











TABLE 5










Prints with the composition of




screen
Invention example nr. 17











type
surface resistance [Ω/square]
Optical density Dvis







P34
250
0.17



P59
408
0.08



P77
540
0.07



P120
830
0.04










Prints with the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 16 gave analogous results to those given in Table 5 with the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 17.
INVENTION EXAMPLES 18 to 22
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 18 to 22 were prepared by adding 400 g of 1,2-propandiol, optionally 49 g diethylene glycol and 400 g of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water and evaporating the resulting mixture in a rotary evaporator at 60° C. under a vacuum of 50 mbar giving the composition and subsequently adding CARBOPOL® ETD 2623 or 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane to give the compositions given in Table 6.









TABLE 6









Composition of Invention



Example [% by weight]












Ingredient
Nr 18
nr 19
nr 20
nr 21
nr 22















PEDOT
0.300
0.279
0.318
0.279
0.300


PEDOT/PSS
1.02
0.95
1.08
0.95
1.02


DEG
—
11.0
—
11.0
—


PD
84.08
78.25
89.42
78.25
84.08


3-glycidoxypropyl-
—
—
—
—
3.00


trimethoxysilane


CARBOPOL ® ETD 2623

—
0.40
0.40
—


deionized water
14.90
9.80
9.10
9.40
11.90









Screen Printing
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 18 to 22 were screen printed on an AUTOSTATTM CT7 support using a screen printer with a P120 screen and dried at 120° C. for 120 s.
Characterization of the Printed Layers
The optical densities through a visible filter and surface resistance of the prints prepared with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 18 to 22 were evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14 and the results are given in Table 7.
The adhesion of the printed layers was determined by a tape test: first scratching the layer cross-wise with a razor blade over an area of ca. 4×10 cm2, applying a 10×24 cm2 piece of TESAPACK® 4122 brown tape, pressing by rubbing with a hard object and finally removing the tape from one end in a single movement in an upward direction. The adhesion of the printed layers was determined visually on a scale of 0 to 5, 0 corresponding to no removal of the layer with the tape, according to the following criteria:













adhesion assessment of 0:
no removal of the layer with the tape;


adhesion assessment of 1:
removal of an area equal to 25% of the



area of the tape with the tape;


adhesion assessment of 2:
removal of an area equal to 50% of the



area of the tape with the tape;


adhesion assessment of 3:
removal of an area equal to 75% of the



area of the tape with the tape;


adhesion assessment of 4:
removal of an area equal to the area of



the tape with the tape;


adhesion assessment of 5:
removal of an area greater than the area



of the tape with the tape.









Intermediate assessments such as 0/1, 1/2, 2/3 and 3/4 were also possible. The results of the evaluation of the adhesion of prints obtained with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 18 to 22 are also given in Table 7.









TABLE 7









Evaluation of Invention Example













nr 18
nr 19
nr 20
nr 21
nr 22















adhesion quality
0
0
0
0
5


optical density, Dvis
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.07


surface resistance
560
1100
550
615
2060


[ohm/square]









The results in Table 7 showed that the adhesion quality was excellent and the surface resistance was low for all prints except in the case of the print using the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 22 containing 3% by weight of 3-glycidoxypropyl-trimethoxysilane.
INVENTION EXAMPLES 23 to 34
The composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 23 was prepared as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 16 and 17 and consisted of: 0.75% by weight of PEDOT/PSS, 93% by weight of 1,2-propandiol, 5.9% by weight of water and 0.5% by weight of 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane.
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 24 to 34 were prepared by adding different surfactants in different concentrations, as given in Table 8, to the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 23.
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 23 to 34 were screen printed on an AUTOSTATTM CT7 support, the standard layer of LUXPRINTTM 7153E and the standard layer of LUXPRINTTM 7138J through a P120 screen and dried at 120° C. for 120 s.
Evaluation of the Prints
The optical density and surface resistance of the prints on AUTOSTAT® CT7 were evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14. The results obtained with prints prepared with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 23 to 34 are given in Table 8.
The adhesion of the prints AUTOSTATTM CT7 support, the standard layer of LUXPRINTTM 7153E and the standard layer of LUXPRINTTM 7138J was evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 18 to 22. The results obtained with prints prepared with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 23 to 34 are also given in Table 8.
The mottle of the printed layers on AUTOSTATTM CT7 support and the standard layers of LUXPRINTTM 7153E and LUXPRINTTM 7138J was determined visually on a scale of 0 to 5, 0 corresponding to a good mottle-free layer, according to the following criteria:













mottle assessment of 0:
no mottle observed upon visual inspection;


mottle assessment of 1:
mottle over between 1 and 10% of print;


mottle assessment of 2:
mottle over between 11 and 20% of print;


mottle assessment of 3:
mottle over between 21 and 40% of print;


mottle assessment of 4:
mottle over between 41 and 60% of print;


mottle assessment of 5:
mottle over more than 60% of the print.









The mottle results for prints obtained with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 23 to 34 are also given in Table 8.










TABLE 8







Composition
surfactant
layer on AUTOSTAT CT7
assessment of mottle in












of
in
surface


layer on














invention
composition
resistance


AUTOSTAT
LUXPRINT
LUXPRINT















example nr
Nr.
wt. %
[Ω/square]
Dvis
adhesion
CT7
7138J
7153E


















23
—
—
2380
0.02
0
1
4
4


24
03
0.125
2280
0.02
—
1
3
4


25
02
0.125
2640
0.02
—
1
2
2


26
04
0.125
2260
0.03
0
1
1–2
4


27

0.25

0.03
0
1
2
2


28

0.50

0.03
0
1
2
2


29
05
0.125
2090
0.03
0
1
1–2
3


30
19
1.0
2090
0.03
0
1
4
5


31
06
0.125
4000
0.03
1
1
3
4


32

0.25

0.03
1
1
3
4


33

0.50

0.03
0–1
1
1–2
3


34

1.0

0.03
2
2
1
1–2









The results in Table 8 show that incorporation of different non-ionic surfactants reduces the mottle and improves the adhesion of prints of compositions according to the present invention.
INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 41
The starting material for the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 41 was prepared by adding 34.68 kg of 1,2-propandiol and 3.84 kg of diethylene glycol to 25.6 kg of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in a reactor, then distilling off 15 L of water by heating with an oil bath at 62° C. under stirring at a vacuum which varied between 31 and 55 mbar over a period of 234 minutes, cooling the resulting mixture to 20° C. and then distilling off a further 4.85 L of water by heating with an oil bath at 60.5° C. under stirring at a vacuum which varied between 24 and 26 mbar over a period of 287 minutes. The water content in the 38.1 kg of paste produced, as determined by the Karl Fischer method, was 3.9% by weight.
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLE 35 to 41 were then prepared by adding deionized water, ZONYL® FSO-100, silicone antifoam agent X50860A and CARBOPOL® AQUA 30 with 30 minutes stirring in the quantities given in Table 9.









TABLE 9









Ingredient quantities [g] used in preparation of



compositions of Invention Example















Nr 35
nr 36
nr 37
nr 38
Nr 39
nr 40
nr 41


















starting material
4,950
8,372.5
3,726
92.83
92.09
93.09
87.65


2-glycidoxypropyl-
25
42.5
—
—
0.5
—
0.5


trimethoxysilane


CARBOPOL ® AQUA 30
—
—
7.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
—


CARBOPOL ® EP2
—
—
—
—
—
—
2.0


Deionized water
9.4
31.9
30.5
4.80
4.66
4.72
9.1


ZONYL ® FSO-100*
6.25
21.25
9.5
0.25
0.25
0.125
0.25


X50860A
6.25
21.25
9.5
0.12
0.5
—
0.5


DEG
3
10.6
5
—
—
0.063
—


Total
5,000
8,500
3,788
100
100
100
100





*ZONYL ® FSO is a 50% by wt solution of ZONYL ® FSO-100 in a mixture of 50% by wt of water and 50% by wt of ethylene glycol






The final compositions are given in Table 10.









TABLE 10









COMPOSITION OF INVENTION EXAMPLES [% by weight]














Ingredient
nr 35
nr 36
Nr 37
nr 38
Nr 39
nr 40
Nr 41

















PEDOT
0.224
0.224
0.224
0.209
0.208
0.210
0.197


PEDOT/PSS
0.760
0.760
0.760
0.712
0.706
0.715
0.672


DEG
9.000
9.000
9.000
8.417
8.350
8.460
7.947


PD
85.040
84.540
84.540
79.094
78.463
79.467
74.681


3-glycidoxypropyl-
0.500
0.500
—
—
0.500
—
0.500


trimethoxysilane


CARBOPOL ® AQUA 30
—
—
0.2000
2.000
2.000
2.000
—


CARBOPOL ® EP2






2.000


ZONYL ® FSO100
0.125
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.250
0.125
0.250


X50860A
0.120
0.240
0.240
0.120
0.500
—
0.500


ethylene glycol
0.063
0.125
0.125
—
—
0.063
—


deionized water
4.262
4.375
4.885
9.407
9.231
9.17
13.450









Viscosity Measurement
The viscosities at 20° C. of screen paste of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 and 36 were measured with an AR1000 plate and cone rheometer (diameter 4 cm; cone angle 2°) with increasing shear rate at particular shear rates are given-in Table 11.









TABLE 11









Viscosity [Pa · s]












Shear
1.2 wt. % PEDOT/
Composition
Composition
Composition
Composition


rate
PSS dispersion
of Invention
of Invention
of Invention
of Invention


[s−1]
in water
Example 35
Example 36
Example 37
Example 39















0.10
0.142
17.59
18.66
37.55
111.1


0.50
0.066
7.843
8.262
14.08


0.63




28.8


1.00
0.076
5.540
5.864
9.103
21.25


5.01
0.079
2.506
2.658
3.380


6.31




6.899


10.00
0.073
1.793
1.903
2.258
5.345


50.12
0.060
0.851
0.908
0.956


63.10




2.109


100.00
0.053
0.634
0.674
0.686
1.684


500.00
0.037
0.325
0.348
0.343


631.00




0.6579









The increase in viscosity upon addition of CARBOPOL® AQUA 30 is partly due to the non-Newtonian behaviour of the CARBOPOL® AQUA 30 solution itself as can be seen from the dependence of viscosity upon shear rate of a 2% by weight solution of CARBOPOL® AQUA 30 in the same medium given in Table 12.










TABLE 12








Viscosity [Pa, s] of 2% CARBOPOL ® AQUA




30 in a solvent mixture consisting



Shear rate
of 87% PG, 9% DEG, 3% water, 0.25% ZONYL ®



[s−1]
FSO100 and 0.5% silicone antifoam agent X50860A



















0.10
2.479



0.63
0.820



1.00
0.633



6.31
0.475



10.00
0.443



63.10
0.308



100.00
0.280



631.00
0.197










A similar situation is also observed with CARBOPOL® EP2 as can be seen from the dependence of viscosity upon shear rate for the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 41 and a solution of CARBOPOL® EP2 in the same medium is given in Table 13.









TABLE 13









Viscosity [Pa, s]










Composition
Solution of 2% CARBOPOL ® EP2 in a solvent


Shear
of
mixture consisting of 87% PG, 9% DEG, 3%


rate
Invention
water, 0.25% ZONYL ® FSO100 and 0.5%


[s−1]
Example nr 41
silicone antifoam agent X50860A












0.10
188.6
2.962


0.63
53.960
2.014


1.00
40.210
1.829


6.31
12.670
1.250


10.00
9.517
1.127


63.10
3.213
0.706


100.00
2.494
0.630


631.00
0.939
0.360









Screen Printing
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 38 and 40 were screen printed on an AUTOSTATTM CT7 support, the standard layer of LUXPRINTTM 7153E and the standard layer of LUXPRINTTM 7138J using a screen printer with a P120 screen and dried at 120° C. for 120 s.
Characterization of the Printed Layers
For coatings of the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 38 and 40 on AUTOSTAT® CT7, the optical densities through a visible filter were evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14, the haze was determined spectrally according to ASTM D1003-61 and the print quality assessed visually. The results for printing through a P120 mesh are given in Table 14.
The haze values reflect the amount of light-scattering in the printed layer and increase as the number of visually observable flecks, i.e. number of light-scattering spots in the print, increases. Lower haze and fewer or no flecks were observed with prints produced with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 37, 38 and 40 than with the prints of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 and 36.









TABLE 14









Print on AUTOSTAT TM CT7 of



composition of Invention Example













Nr 35
Nr 36
Nr 37
nr 38
nr 40





Print
flecks
flecks
A few flecks
no flecks
no flecks


quality


Haze [%]
5.99
5.66
—
3.57
2.57


Dvis
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03









For coatings of the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 38 and 40 on AUTOSTAT® CT7, MAKROFOL DE 1-1 SCI, PET with subbing layer 1 and layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E, the mottle of the prints was evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 23 to 34. The results for printing through a P120 mesh are given in Table 15.
Very low mottle was observed upon printing with all compositions on all the films and on the layer of LUXPRINT® 7138J. Only in the case of prints on LUXPRINT® 7153E was a significant variation in mottle observed as a function of coating composition with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 and 36 performing significantly more poorly than the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 37, 38 and 40.









TABLE 15









Print using composition



of Invention Example












MOTTLE TEST
nr 35
nr 36
nr 37
nr 38
nr 40





AUTOSTAT TM CT7
1
1
1
1
1


MAKROFOL DE 1-1 SC1
1
1
—
1
1


PET with subbing
1
1
—
1
1


layer no 1


LUXPRINT 7138J
2
2
0–1
0–1
1


LUXPRINT 7153E
4
3
1
1
1–2









For coatings of the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 38 and 40 on AUTOSTAT® CT7, MAKROFOL DE 1-1 SCI, PET with subbing layer 1 and layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E, the adhesion quality was evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 18 to 22. The results for printing through a P120 mesh are given in Table 16.









TABLE 16









Print using composition



of Invention Example












ADHESION QUALITY
nr 35
nr 36
nr 37
nr 38
nr 40





AUTOSTAT TM CT7
0
0
0
0
0


MAKROFOL TM DE 1-1 SC1
3
3
—
3
—


PET with subbing
0
0
—
0
0


layer no 1


LUXPRINT 7138J
1
0
0
0
0


LUXPRINT 7153E
0
0
0
0
0









Excellent adhesion was observed except for MAKROFOLTM DE 1-1 SC1.
For coatings of the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 38 and 40 on AUTOSTAT® CT7, MAKROFOL DE 1-1 SC1, PET with subbing layer 1 and layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E, the surface resistance of the prints were evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14. The results for printing through a P120 mesh are given in Table 17.









TABLE 17









SURFACE RESISTANCE in



[ohm/square] of a print using



composition of Invention Example













nr 35
nr 36
nr 37
nr 38
nr 40
















AUTOSTAT TM CT7
1423
1390
2200
1723
1523


MAKROFOL DE 1-1 SC1
1393
1343
—
1546
1503


PET WITH SUBBING
1296
1256
—
1583
1566


LAYER NO 1


LUXPRINT 7138J
3150
2360
5700
4050
2200


LUXPRINT 7153E
5200
1800
2390
1725
1850









The surface resistances for prints on film produced with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 and 36 were significantly lower than those produced with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 37, 38 and 40. The variation in the surface resistances observed on LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINT® 7153E layers was due to layer thickness variation as a result of the different wetting behaviour of the different compositions.
The results for layers printed through different mesh sizes onto AUTOSTAT CT7 and unsubbed PET are given in Table 18. The surface resistance increased significantly and the optical density decreased significantly with increasing layer thickness.










TABLE 18









Invention Example 35
Evaluation of prints on AUTOSTAT CT7











Unsubbed PET
Invention Example 35
Invention Example 36















Silk
Surface


surface


surface



Screen
resistance


resistance


resistance


type
[Ω/square]
Dvis
adhesion
[Ω/square]
Dvis
Adhesion
[Ω/square]
Dvis


















P43
—
—
—
423
0.09
—
463
0.09


P59
—
—
—
562
0.08
—
586
0.07


P79
—
—
0
700
0.05
—
796
0.05


P120
1200
0.03
0
1423
0.03
0
1390
0.03









INVENTION EXAMPLES 42 to 45
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLE 42 to 45 were prepared from the starting material used in INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 41 by adding deionized water, ZONYL FSO, 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy-silane, silicone antifoam agent X50860A and optionally Flexonyl® Blue B2G with 30 minutes stirring in the quantities given in Table 19.









TABLE 19









Ingredient quantities [g] used in



preparation of compositions



of Invention Example













nr 42
nr 43
nr 44
nr 45


















Starting material
297
295.5
99.0
98.5



2-glycidoxypropyl-
1.5
1.5
0.5
0.5



trimethoxysilane



ZONYL ® FSO
0.75
1.5
0.25
0.5



X50860A
0.75
1.5
0.25
0.5



PIG01
—
—
6.0
6.0










The final compositions are given in Table 20.










TABLE 20









COMPOSITION OF INVENTION




EXAMPLES [% by weight]











Ingredient
nr 42
nr 43
Nr 44
nr 45














PEDOT
0.224
0.223
0.211
0.211


PEDOT/PSS
0.762
0.759
0.719
0.716


DEG
9.032
8.986
8.521
8.477


PD
85.344
84.913
80.513
80.107


3-glycidoxypropyl-
0.500
0.500
0.472
0.472


trimethoxysilane


ZONYL ® FSO100
0.125
0.250
0.118
0.118


X50860A
0.250
0.500
0.236
0.472


ethylene glycol
0.063
0.125
0.059
0.118


deionized water
3.924
3.967
3.702
3.742


PIG01
—
—
5.660
5.660





* ZONYL ® FSO is a 50% by wt solution of ZONYL ® FSO100 a mixture of 50% by wt of water and 50% by wt of ethylene glycol






The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 42 to 45 were screen printed with a manual press and a P120 screen onto AUTOSTAT CT7 support. The surface resistance and optical densities were determined as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14. The results are given in Table 21.













TABLE 21





Invention





Surface resistance


example nr
Screen
Dblue
Dgreen
Dred
Dvis
[Ω/square]





















42
P120
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.03
1663


43
P120
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03
1917


44
P120
0.08
0.18
0.83
0.38
2843


45
P120
0.09
0.18
0.74
0.37
3583









The optical density results for prints printed with the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 44 and 45 show them to be transparent and blue.
INVENTION EXAMPLES 46 to 51
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLE 46 to 51 were prepared from the starting material used in INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 41 by adding deionized water, different non-ionic and anionic fluoro-surfactants as given in Table 22, 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxy-silane and silicone antifoam agent X50860A with 30 minutes stirring in the quantities given in Table 22.









TABLE 22









Composition of Invention Example













Ingredient
46
47
48
49
50
51
















starting material
98.75
98.5
98.0
97.22
98.29
98.75


3-glycidoxypropyl-
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


trimethoxysilane


Zonyl ® FSO100
0.25
—
—
—
—
—


Zonyl ® FSO
—
0.5
—
—
—
—


Zonyl ® FSA
—
—
1
—
—
—


Zonyl ® FSE
—
—
—
1.78
—
—


Zonyl ® FSP
—
—
—
—
0.71
—


ammonium perfluoro-
—
—
—
—
—
0.25


octanoate


X50860A
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5









The final compositions are given in Table 23.









TABLE 23









Composition of Invention Example













Ingredient
46
47
48
49
50
51
















PEDOT/PSS
0.762
0.760
0.756
0.750
0.758
0.762


DEG
9.023
9.000
8.954
8.883
8.981
9.023


PD
84.754
84.540
84.110
83.441
84.359
84.754


3-glycidoxypropyl-
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500


trimethoxysilane


Zonyl ® FSO100 (active)
0.250
—
—
—
—
—


Zonyl ® FSO (active)
—
0.250
—
—
—
—


Zonyl ® FSA (active)
—
—
0.250
—
—
—


Zonyl ® FSE (active)
—
—
—
0.250
—
—


Zonyl ® FSP (active)
—
—
—
—
0.249
—


Ammonium perfluoro-octanoate
—
—
—
—
—
0.012


silicone antifoam
0.240
0.240
0.240
0.240
0.240
0.240


agent X50860A


ethylene glycol
—
0.125
—
1.071
—
—


isopropanol
—
—
0.325
—
0.319
—


deionized water
4.471
4.586
4.815
4.865
4.594
4.711









The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 46 to 51 were screen printed with a manual press and a P120 screen onto a AUTOSTAT CT7 support and standard Luxprint® 7138J and Luxprint® 7153E layers as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 35 to 38 and 40. The surface resistance and optical densities were determined as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14. The mottle and adhesion quality were determined as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 23 to 34 and INVENTION EXAMPLES 18 to 22. The results are given in Table 24.
The mottle of layers of the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 46 to 51 were either good or very good, very low mottle being observed with layers containing both non-ionic and anionic surfactants.
Excellent adhesion on the standard Luxprint® 7138J and Luxprint® 7153E layers was realized both with compositions with non-ionic surfactant (INVENTION EXAMPLES 46 and 47) and with compositions with anionic surfactants (INVENTION EXAMPLES 48 and 51). However, the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 49 and 50, with phosphate anionic surfactants, gave poor adhesion on one or both layers. In the case of Autostat® CT7 all the compositions realized excellent or very good adhesion, regardless of whether the compositions contained non-ionic or anionic surfactants.









TABLE 24









Composition of Invention Example nr














46
47
48
49
50
51

















Dvis
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.05
0.04


Mottle test


Autostat ®
1
1
1–2
1
1–2
1


CT7


Adhesion


Quality


Autostat ®
0–1
0
0
0–1
0–1
0


CT7


Luxprint ®
0
0
0
0–1
4
0


7138J


Luxprint ®
0
0
0
4
4
0


7153E


Surface


resistance


in ohm/square


Autostat ®
695
773
833
763
786
850


CT7


Luxprint ®
3090
2900
2350
1475
1400
3600


7138J


Luxprint ®
710
740
705
875
775
795


7153E









The surface resitivities realized on Autostat® CT7 and the standard Luxprint® 7138J and Luxprint® 7153E layers varied with the choice of surfactant. The lower surface resistances realized on the standard Luxprint® 7138J with compositions containing ZONYL® FSE and ZONYL® FSP, both anionic phosphate surfactants (see INVENTION EXAMPLES 49 and 50) are notable, but this in the case of the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 50 was associated with poor adhesion.
These results clearly show that non-ionic and anionic surfactants can be used in the compositions according to the present invention.
INVENTION EXAMPLES 52 to 58
The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 52 to 58 were prepared by mixing the solvent given in Table 25 in the quantity also given in Table 25 to the quantity of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water given in Table 25 and evaporating with stirring from the resulting mixtures by distillation at 60° C. at a vacuum of 50 mbar giving the compositions also given in Table 25. The content of PEDOT in these compositions, obtained by dividing the content of PEDOT/PSS by 3.4, varied between 0.53 and 1.03% by weight.











TABLE 25









mixture before dewatering

(final) composition















non-aqueous
1.2 wt %


non-aqueous




Invention
solvent
PEDOT/PSS
wt %
PEDOT/
solvent
















example

quantity
dispersion
water
PSS

quantity
water
surfactant

















Nr
type
[g]
in water
removed
[wt %]
type
[wt. %]
[wt %]
nr.
wt %




















52
PD
50
150
68.2
1.8
PD
50
47.2
05
1


53
PD
75
150
85.0
1.8
PD
75
22.2
05
1


54
PD
20
267
71.3
3.2
PD
20
75.8
11
1


55
DEG
20
291.7
74.5
3.5
DEG
20
73.6
11
2.9


56
DEG
20
241.7
68.7
2.9
DEG
20
74.7
11
2.4


57
PD + DEG
17
200
68.0
2.4
PD + DEG
17 + 17
63.26
*
0.34




17


58
DEG
17
241.7
66.9
2.9
DEG
17
79.1
05
1





* a 2% by weight dispersion of TiO2 in PD






The compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 52 to 58 were screen printed though the screen given in Table 26 onto AUTOSTAT® CT7 and the print dried at 120° C. for 240 s.
The surface resistance and optical densities were determined as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14. The results are summarized in Table 26.










TABLE 26









P48 screen
P77 screen













Composition


Surface


Surface


of Invention
layer

resistance
layer

resistance


example nr
quality
Dvis
[Ω/square]
quality
Dvis
[Ω/square]





52
excellent
0.16
150
excel-
0.10
250






lent


53

—
—
many
0.07
430






micro-






bubbles


54
—
—
—
excel-
0.15
175






lent


55
a few
0.25
 85
—
—
—



bubbles


56
a few
0.21
100
many
0.18
115



bubbles


bubbles


57
marginal
0.40
140
—
—
—



adhesion


58
good
0.21
 85
—
—
—



adhesion









The results in Table 26 show that there is significant reduction in surface resistance upon increasing the concentration of PEDOT/PSS in the composition coated.
INVENTION EXAMPLES 59 to 69
The composition for preparing the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 59 to 69 was prepared by first adding 18 kg of 1,2-propandiol and 2 kg of diethylene glycol to 20 kg of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water, then evaporating water with stirring at 60° C. and a vacuum of 50 mbar until 15.05 kg of liquid (mainly water) had been removed and finally adding the ingredients given in Table 27 to 297 g thereof with stirring to obtain the starting composition given therein.









TABLE 27







Ingredient quantities [g] used



in preparation of compositions



of Invention Examples 59 to 69

















Starting material
297


2-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane
1.5


ZONYL ® FSO
0.75


X50860A
0.75









PIG01 to PIG07 were then added to the composition given in Table 27 in the quantities necessary to obtain the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 59 to 69 given in Table 28 below.









TABLE 28









COMPOSITION OF INVENTION EXAMPLES [% by weight]


















Ingredient
nr 59
nr 60
nr 61
nr 62
nr 63
nr 64
nr 65
nr 66
nr 67
nr 68
nr 69





















PEDOT
0.306
0.312
0.306
0.312
0.294
0.306
0.312
0.312
0.312
0.312
0.306


PEDOT/PSS
1.04
1.06
1.04
1.06
1.00
1.04
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.06
1.04


DEG
7.79
7.92
7.79
7.92
7.53
7.79
7.92
7.92
7.92
7.92
7.79


PD
69.87
71.04
69.87
71.04
67.53
69.87
71.04
71.04
71.04
71.04
69.87


3-glycidoxypropyl-
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5


trimethoxysilane


CARBOPOL ® AQUA 30
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0


ZONYL ® FSO100
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25


X50860A
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.024
0.024


PIG01
0.6
0.3
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


PIG02
—
—
1.0
0.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
—


PIG03
—
—
—
—
1.2
0.6
—
—
—
—
—


PIG04
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.6
—
—
—
—


PIG05
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.5
—
—
—


PIG06
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1.5
—
—


PIG07
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
0.57
1.14


deionized water
17.92
16.90
17.52
16.70
19.97
17.92
16.60
15.70
15.70
15.70
17.38









The pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 59 to 69 were screen printed through a P43 mesh using a hand screen printing press onto an AUTOSTAT® CT7 support and layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E and dried at 120° C. for 2 minutes for AUTOSTAT® CT7 and 130° C. for 5 minutes for the layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E. The print quality, adhesion, surface resistance and optical density were then evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14. The results for prints on AUTOSTAT® CT7 are given in Table 29.
Significantly coloured prints were obtained with excellent adhesion and low surface resistances: ca. 400 Ω/square were obtained with all pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 59 to 69. The properties of the prints appeared to be little affected by the choice of pigment.









TABLE 29









Properties of layers coated through



P43 screen on Autostat ® CT7










Invention

surface



Example
adhesion using
resistance
optical density in reflection













number
Tesapack 4122
[Ω/square]
dblue
dgreen
dred
dvis
















59
0
410
0.25
0.48
2.12
0.80


60
0
360
0.21
0.34
1.34
0.59


61
0
430
1.53
0.22
0.17
0.20


62
0
330
1.17
0.22
0.19
0.21


63
0
410
1.11
0.24
0.18
0.22


64
0
440
0.80
0.21
0.19
0.21


65
0
370
0.14
0.18
0.44
0.27


66
0
330
0.22
0.27
0.49
0.36


67
1
340
0.15
0.19
0.29
0.21


68
0–1
370
1.01
0.98
0.88
0.91


69
0
400
1.78
1.62
1.52
1.59









The results for prints on layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E are given in Table 30.









TABLE 30







Invention
P43 coating on 7153 layer
P43 coating on 7138 layer


Example
surface resistance [Ω/square]
surface resistance [Ω/square]











number
single layer
double layer
single layer
double layer














59
440
—
560
—


60
330
170
390
170


61
390
200
410
220


62
340
180
340
180


63
410
200
460
214


64
400
230
430
220


65
350
190
370
200


66
310
170
390
165


67
340
160
400
160


68
320
170
330
160


69
380
185
490
190









Again single prints obtained with the pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 59 to 69 all had surface resistances of ca. 400 Ω/square, which decreased to ca. 200 Ω/square when a second print was printed on top of the first print.
These results show that pigmented compositions, according to the present invention, can be used to produce prints with significant optical densities with surface resistances of ca. 400 Ω/square independent of the choice of pigment.
INVENTION EXAMPLE 70 to 72
The starting compositions for preparing the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 70 and 71 and INVENTION EXAMPLE 72 respectively were prepared by first adding 594 g of 1,2-propandiol and 6 g of N-methyl-pyrrolidinone and 540 g of 1,2-propandiol and 60 g of N-methyl-pyrrolidinone respectively to 400 g of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water and then evaporating water with stirring by distillation at 60° C. and a vacuum of 0.98 bar until 391 g and 398 g of liquid (mainly water) respectively had been removed after 70 and 90 minutes respectively. The compositions thereby obtained are given in Table 31.










TABLE 31







Starting composition for
Starting composition for



Invention Examples 70 & 71
Invention Example 72


















PEDOT/PSS
0.788
0.797


PD
96.7
89.2


NMP
0.98
9.9


deionized water
1.48
0.03









These compositions were then used as the starting compositions for preparing the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 70 and 71 and INVENTION EXAMPLE 72 respectively by adding the appropriate quantities of the ingredients given in Table 32 to prepare the compositions given therein.
The non-pigmented pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 70 to 72 were screen printed through a P79 mesh using a hand screen printing press onto BAYFOL® CR 1-4 and AUTOSTAT® CT7 supports and layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E and dried at 80° C. for 10 minutes for BAYFOL® CR 1-4, 120° C. for 2 minutes for AUTOSTAT® CT7 and 130° C. for 5 minutes for layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E. The print quality, adhesion, surface resistance and optical density were then evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14.









TABLE 32









Composition of



Invention Example [wt %]












Ingredient
nr 70
nr 71
nr 72
















PEDOT
0.215
0.203
0.215



PEDOT/PSS
0.73
0.69
0.73



PD
89.4
85.2
81.4



DEG
—
0.95
—



NMP
0.93
0.88
9.04



3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane
0.50
0.48
0.49



CARBOPOL ® AQUA 30
6.66
6.35
6.58



ZONYL ® FSO100
0.25
0.24
0.25



X50860A
0.05
0.05
0.05



DISPERCOLL ® U VP KA 8481
—
3.81
—



deionized water
1.39
1.32
1.37










The print quality results are given in Table 33, the surface resistance results in Table 34, the optical density measurements in Table 35 and the adhesion results in Table 36.










TABLE 33









Invention
Print on BAYFOL ® CR 1–4












Example nr
mottle
pinholes
haze







70
2
0
—



71
0
0
1



72
1
3
2



















TABLE 34









Surface resistance [Ω/square]










Invention
P79 layer on
P79 layer on
P79 layer on


Example nr
BAYFOL ® CR 1–4
AUTOSTAT ® CT7
LUXPRINT ® 7138J layer













70
2800
2800
3200


71
3200
3100
3300


72
2000
2350
3440


















TABLE 35







Invention
P79 layer on AUTOSTAT ® CT 7












Example nr
dblue
dgreen
dred
dvis





70
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.02


71
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03


72
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.01


















TABLE 36









Adhesion according to TESAPACK ® 4122 TEST











Invention


P79 layer on
P79 layer on


Example
P79 layer on
P79 layer on
LUXPRINT ®
LUXPRINT ®


nr
BAYFOL ® CR 1–4
AUTOSTAT ® CR7
7138J layer
7153E layer





70
4
0
4
4


71
0
0
0
0


72
4
0
0
0









The results in Table 36 clearly show a higher adhesion with the print produced with the paste of INVENTION EXAMPLE 71 with DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481 than with prints produced with the pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 70 and 72 without DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481. This demonstrates the efficacious effect of DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481 on the adhesion of pastes, according to the present invention, on BAYFOL® CR 1-4.
INVENTION EXAMPLE 73 to 76
The composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 73 was prepared by first adding 54 kg of 1,2-propandiol and 6 kg of diethylene glycol to 40 kg of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water and then evaporating water with stirring by distillation at 60° C. (heating element temperature) and a vacuum of 83 mbar for 11 hours whereupon 39.75 kg of liquid had been removed and the residual water concentration was 2.7% by weight. The ingredients given in Table 37 for INVENTION EXAMPLE 73 were then added with stirring to obtain the composition given therein.
The composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 73 was then used as the starting composition for preparing the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLE 74 to 76 by adding the appropriate quantities of DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481 to give the compositions given in Table 37.









TABLE 37









Composition of



Invention Example [wt %]











Ingredient
nr 73
nr 74
nr 75
nr 76














PEDOT
0.229
0.224
0.221
0.209


PEDOT/PSS
0.78
0.76
0.75
0.71


PD
80.9
79.3
77.7
73.4


DEG
9.35
9.17
8.99
8.50


3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane
0.51
0.50
0.49
0.46


CARBOPOL ® AQUA 30
6.74
6.60
6.47
6.12


ZONYL ® FSO100
0.25
0.25
0.24
0.23


X50860A
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05


DISPERCOLL ® U VP KA 8481
—
1.98
3.89
9.18


deionized water
1.40
1.38
1.35
1.27









The pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 73 to 76 were screen printed through a P79 mesh using a hand screen printing press onto BAYFOL® CR 1-4 and AUTOSTAT® CT7 supports and layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E and dried at 80° C. for 10 minutes for BAYFOL® CR 1-4, 120° C. for 2 minutes for AUTOSTAT® CT7 and 130° C. for 5 minutes for layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E. The print quality, adhesion, surface resistance and optical density were then evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14.
The print quality results on BAYFOL® CR 1-4 are given in Table 38, the surface resistance results on all the media in Table 39 and the optical density measurements of prints on BAYFOL® CR 1-4 and AUTOSTAT® CT7 in Table 40.










TABLE 38









Invention
Print on BAYFOL ® CR 1–4












Example nr
mottle
pinholes
haze







73
0
0
1



















TABLE 39









Surface resistance [Ω/square] of P79 layer











Invention
on BAYFOL ® CR 1–4
on
on
on












Example
before
after 100%
AUTOSTAT ®
LUXPRINT ®
LUXPRINT ®


nr
stretch
stretching at 120° C.
CR7
7138J layer
7153E layer















73
740
10700
1050
1050
840


74
990
10800
840
840
—


75
1430
23000
1000
1000
—


76
1240
20100
960
960
—



















TABLE 40









P79 layer on




BAYFOL ® CR 1–4










Invention
dvis

P79 layer on


Example
before
dvis after 100%
AUTOSTAT ® CR7













nr
stretch
stretching at 120° C.
dblue
dgreen
dred
dvis





73
0.05
0.08
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.02


74
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.03


75
0.03
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03


76
0.03
0.11
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.02









The adhesion measurements on all the media are given in Table 41.









TABLE 41









Adhesion according to TESAPACK ® 4122 TEST on P79 layer











Invention
on BAYFOL ® CR 1–4
on
on
on












Example
before
after 100%
AUTOSTAT ®
LUXPRINT ®
LUXPRINT ®


nr
stretch
stretching at 120° C.
CR7
7138J layer
7153E layer





73
4
5
1
0
0


74
0
0
0
0
0


75
0
0
0
0
0


76
0
0
0
0
0









The adhesion measurements of the prints on AUTOSTAT® CT7 and the layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E were excellent for all the pastes evaluated i.e. with or without DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481. However, with BAYFOL® CR 1-4 there was a significant improvement in adhesion with prints produced with the pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 74 to 76 containing DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481 compared with prints produced with the paste of INVENTION EXAMPLE 73 without DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481. Furthermore, this excellent adhesion on BAYFOL® CR 1-4 was maintained upon stretching the printed support by 100% at 120° C. in the cases of prints produced with pastes, according to the present invention, containing DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481. This stretching was accompanied by an increase in optical density from 0.02 to 0.03 to 0.07 to 0.11 and a 10- to 16-fold increase in surface resistance. This increase in resistance upon stretching was significantly lower in the case of prints produced with the paste of INVENTION EXAMPLE 74 compared with prints produced with the pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 75 and 76 indicating that an excess of DISPERCOLL® U VP KA 8481 over that required to realize good adhesion results in an increase in surface resistance of the resulting print which is much greater upon stretching.
INVENTION EXAMPLE 77
The composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 77 was prepared by adding 239 g of n-butanol, 631 g of 1,2-propandiol and 69 g of diethylene glycol to 1635 g of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water and then evaporating water in part as pure water and in part as an azeotropic mixture with n-butanol (42.8% by weight water and 57.2% by weight n-butanol with a boiling point at atmospheric pressure of 92.7° C. compared with 100° C. for water and 117° C. for n-butanol) with stirring by distillation at 60° C. (heat source temperature) and a vacuum of 30 mbar for 16 hours whereupon 1793 g of liquid had been removed and a final PEDOT/PSS concentration of 2.5% by weight had been realized with a residual water content of 3.9% by weight as determined using the Karl Fisher method.
INVENTION EXAMPLES 78 and 79
The starting compositions for preparing the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 78 and 79 were prepared by first adding 34.56 kg of diethylene glycol to 230.4 kg of a 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.4 in water to a 400 L vessel and then evaporating water with stirring by distillation at 88–89° C. using an oil bath at 110° C. for INVENTION EXAMPLE 78 and at 55° C. using a water both at 60° C. for INVENTION EXAMPLE 79 in both cases at a vacuum of 0.02 bar, while simultaneously 311.04 kg of 1,2-propandiol were added at a rate of 31 kg per hour, until 242.9 kg of mainly water had evaporated and the concentration of water had been reduced to a concentration of 1.1% by weight and 8.4% by weight respectively. The compositions thereby obtained are given in Table 42.










TABLE 42







Starting composition




for Invention
Starting composition for



Example 78 [wt %]
Invention Example 79 [wt %]


















PEDOT/PSS
0.82
0.73


PD
88.28
81.77


DEG
9.8
9.1


deionized water
1.1
8.4









These compositions were then used as the starting compositions for preparing the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 78 and 79 respectively by adding the appropriate quantities of the ingredients given in Table 43 to prepare 200 g of the compositions given therein.










TABLE 43









Composition of Invention




Example [wt %]











Ingredient
nr 78
nr 79















PEDOT
0.238
0.211



PEDOT/PSS
0.808
0.719



PD
86.956
80.543



DEG
9.653
8.964



3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane
0.5
0.5



ZONYL ® FSO100
0.5
0.5



X50860A
0.5
0.5



deionized water
1.084
8.274










The pastes of INVENTION EXAMPLES 78 and 79 were screen printed through a P120 mesh using a hand screen printing press onto AUTOSTAT® CT7 supports and layers of LUXPRINTTM 7138J and LUXPRINTM 7153E and dried at 120° C. for 2 minutes for AUTOSTAT® CT7 and 130° C. for 5 minutes for layers of LUXPRINT® 7138J and LUXPRINTTM 7153E. The print quality, adhesion, surface resistance and optical density were then evaluated as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 14.
The print quality results, optical density measurements and surface resistance results for INVENTION EXAMPLES 78 and 79 are given in Tables 44 and 45 respectively.















TABLE 44












Surface




Print




resistance



quality
Dblue
Dgreen
Dred
Dvis
[Ω/square]
Adhesion























Autostat
mat
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
13800



CT7


Luxprint
—
—
—
—
—
50000


7138J


Luxprint
—
—
—
—
—
34000


7153E
























TABLE 45












Surface




Print




resistance



quality
Dblue
Dgreen
Dred
Dvis
[Ω/square]
Adhesion























Autostat
slight
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.03
2170



CT7
mottle


Luxprint
—
—
—
—
—
5100


7138J


Luxprint
—
—
—
—
—
5300


7153E









The results in Tables 44 and 45 clearly show that prints obtained with the paste of INVENTION EXAMPLE 47 prepared from a starting composition prepared by evaporation at 88–89° C. exhibited inferior coating quality and surface resistances to those obtained with the paste of INVENTION EXAMPLE 48 with the same composition but prepared from a starting composition prepared by evaporation at 55° C.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5
EXAMPLE 1 of WO 02/042352 was repeated by first polymerizing EDOT in the presence of PSS as disclosed in EP-A-0 440 957, 150 g of the resulting dispersion mixed with 600 g (690 mL) of toluene forming an oil in water emulsion and 260 mL of the water/toluene azeotrope distilled off at 90° C., using an oil bath whose temperature did not exceed 135° C., over a period of 2 hours. Overnight the PEDOT/PSS-layer settled out and a precipitate was observed on the thermometer. The distillation of the azeotrope was resumed at a temperature of 92° C. for a further 200 minutes after which a total of 825 mL (723.8 g) of the azeotrope had distilled off. The distillate separated into an aqueous phase (130 mL) and an oil phase. 17.8 g of a deep blue-black residue containing 1.8 g of PEDOT/PSS-latex and 16 g of water was recovered by washing with ethanol, filtered off and dried and was found to have a rubbery consistency. This residue readily redispersed in water after 5 minutes in an ultrasonic bath.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 6
Preparation of Screen Printing Inks with a Powder Prepared by Freeze-drying an Aqueous PEDOT/PSS-dispersion as Disclosed in SAMPLES XVII to XXIII of WO 02/00759
SAMPLES XVII to XXIII of WO 02/00759 were prepared by adding different solvents optionally together with CARBOPOLTM ETD2623 to a powder prepared by freeze-drying a 1.2% by weight aqueous dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio PEDOT:PSS of 1:2.46 under high vacuum (0.7 hPa (mbar)) in a CHRIST BETA2-16 shelf freeze-dryer until all of the water was evaporated (i.e. until the temperature of the shelves was equal to room temperature), predispersing with an ULTRA-TURRAXTM followed by prolonged ball milling [for duration see Table 46 (=Table 8 of WO 02/00759)] so as to obtain samples XVII to XXIII with the compositions given in Table 46 (=Table 8 of WO 02/00759).







TABLE 46







(= Table 8 of WO 02/00759):














PEDOT/


CARBOPOL



ball milling
PSSA
water
solvent medium
ETD 2623













Sample
duration [h]
[wt. %]
[wt %]

[wt. %]
[wt. %]
















XVII
24
1.19
0.31
diethylene glycol/
98.5
—






carbitol-acetate






4/1


XVIII
48
1.58
0.42
diethylene glycol
96.0
2


XIX
48
1.58
0.42
N-methyl-pyrrolidone
96.0
2


XX
48
1.58
0.42
isopropanol
96.0
2


XXII
96
1.98
0.52
n-propanol
97.5
—


XXIII
24
1.24
0.31
diethylene glycol
98.45
—









Such high energy dispersion techniques are disadvantageous compared with the process, according to the present invention, which realizes exchange of water for an organic medium without the expenditure of such high energy over such long periods.
Samples XVII to XXIII obtained as a result of redispersing the freeze-dried powder are characterized in Table 47 (=Table 9 of WO 02/00759).







TABLE 47







(= Table 9 of WO 02/00759):










Sample
dispersion characteristics







XVII
viscous and flocked



XVIII
very thick dispersion



XIX
very thick dispersion



XX
very thick dispersion



XXII
strongly flocked



XXIII
homogeneous flowing dispersion










The complex viscosity η* of Sample XXIII was determined with a AR1000 cone and plate Rheometer at 25° C. and frequencies of 10, 1 and 0.1 Hz to be 1000 Pa·s, 5000 Pa·s and 40,000 Pa·s respectively.
Screen printing was carried out with Sample XXIII with a P59 screen on a subbed polyethylene terephthalate support. The surface resistance of the resulting prints was determined by cutting a strip having a length of 27.5 cm and a width of 35 mm, applying electrodes of a conductive polymer, ECCOCOAT CC-2, over the width of the strip a distance of 10 cm apart, applying a constant potential between the electrodes, measuring the current flowing through the circuit with a Pico-amperemeter KEITHLEY 485 and calculating the surface resistivity in Ω/square from the potential and the current, taking into account the geometry of the area between the electrodes. The optical density of the print was measured with a MACBETHTM T924 densitometer through a visible filter. The results are given in Table 48 (=Table 10 of WO 02/00759).







TABLE 48







(= Table 10 of WO 02/00759):











mesh used in
Surface resistivity
Optical density


Sample
screen printing
[Ω/square]
[visible filter]





XXIII
P59
370
0.11









INVENTION EXAMPLE 80
The composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 80 was prepared by adding 570 g of ethylene glycol to 430 g of a conventional 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.46 in water and then evaporating the resulting mixtures in a rotary evaporator at 60° C. and a vacuum of 50 hPa (mbar) giving the composition in Table 49.









TABLE 49







INVENTION EXAMPLE 80

















wt % PEDOT
 0.29


wt % PEDOT/PSS determined by drying
 1.00


for 4 h at 150° C.


wt. % ethylene glycol
 95.6


wt % deionized water as determined by
 3.4


Karl-Fischer method


Weight averaged mean particle size [nm]
183*


viscosity at 25° C. and 1 s−1
12.56 Pa · s


viscosity at 25° C. and 25 s−1
1.399 Pa · s





*bimodal distribution with peaks at 91.8 nm and 247.7 nm






The particle size of the PEDOT/PSS-latex in the solvent-exchanged dispersion was determined as described for the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 10 and the results given in Table 49. Viscosity measurements were carried out with an AR1000 plate and cone rheometer at 25° C. with a cone with an angle of 20 and a plate 4 cm in diameter with increasing shear rate from 0.1 to 1000 s−1 viscosities are given in Table 49 for shear rates of 1 s−1 and 25 s−1. A shear rate of 25 s−1 approximately corresponds to the shear rate realized with a Brookfield viscometer with a #2 spindle.
The composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 80 was too viscous to filter and was spin-coated onto a glass plate by spinning for 1 s at 2000 rpm and then 50 s at 4000 rpm followed by drying for 30 minutes at 25° C. followed by 5 minutes at 85° C. Further layers were coated on the spin-coated layer following the same procedure. The layers obtained by 1, 2 and 3 spin-coatings were characterized as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 10 and the results obtained are given in Table 50. The frequency of aggregates was assessed by pipetting 0.1 g of the solvent-exchanged dispersion taken from the centre of the pot onto a A5-size sheet of AUTOSTATTM CT7 and then placing an A5-size sheet of AUTOSTATTM CT7 on top and visually inspecting the dispersion on a scale of 1 to 3, according to the following criteria:
















aggregate assessment of 0:
no aggregates observed;



aggregate assessment of 1:
 1 to 2 aggregates;



aggregate assessment of 2:
13 to 5 aggregates observed;



aggregate assessment of 3:
more than 5 aggregates observed.






















TABLE 50







number of
layer

surface




spin-coated
thickness
aggregate
resistance
layer conductivity
optical density















layers
[nm]
assessment
[Ω/square]
[S/cm]
Dblue
Dgreen
Dred
Dvis


















1
66.7
0
2347
64
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02


2
105.7
0
953
99
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03


3
149.3
0–1
566
118
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.05









COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 7 to 9
The starting materials for the pastes of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 7 to 9 were prepared according to the process disclosed in WO 02/067273. A 500 mL in a 3-neck flask was filled with 100 mL of ethylene glycol, which was heated to 120° C. on an oil bath and stirred with an ULTRA-TURRAX stirrer at 2000 rpm. 76 mL of a conventional 1.2% by weight dispersion of PEDOT/PSS with a weight ratio of PEDOT to PSS of 1:2.46 in water was added with a perfusor pump at a rate of 1 mL/min while flushing continuously with nitrogen. Much of the water evaporated escaped via the shaft of the ULTRA-TURRAX stirrer. After 3 hours the mixture was cooled to room temperature. In COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 7 a Dean Stark trap was used and in COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 8 and 9 the Dean Stark trap was replaced with a conventional distillation set-up using a condenser to improve the rate of distillation. The conventional PEDOT/PSS dispersion used in COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 7 and 8 came from the same batch as that used in preparing the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 80 and BAYTRONTM P obtained from BAYER was used for preparing the composition of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 9.
The resulting dispersions all exhibited thixotropy and were filtered through a 8 μm Millipore microfilter leaving little residue behind. The composition and concentration of the resulting dispersions are summarized in Table 51. All the dispersions exhibited pronounced flocking.
The particle size of the PEDOT/PSS-latex in the solvent-exchanged dispersion was determined as described for the compositions of INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 10 and the results given in Table 51. Viscosity measurements were carried out with an AR1000 plate and cone rheometer at 25° C. with a cone with an angle of 2° and a plate 4 cm in diameter with increasing shear rate from 0.1 to 1000 s−1, viscosities are given in Table 51 for shear rates of 1 s−1 and 25 s−1. A shear rate of 25 s−1 approximately corresponds to the shear rate realized with a Brookfield viscometer with a #2 spindle.












TABLE 51









quantity of

particle size





water as

distribution













Comparative
PEDOT/
determined by
ethylene
weight
half-
viscosity# at 25° C.


Example
PSS*
Karl-Fischer
glycol
averaged
width
[Pa · s]














nr
[wt %]
method [wt %]
[wt %]
mean nm
[nm]
at 1 s−1
at 25 s−1

















7
0.81
15.3
83.89
77.7
55.6
0.515
0.192


8
0.8
13.6
85.6
78.5
76.4
0.559
0.205


9
1.0
10.05
88.95
96.1
59.5
0.660
0.223





*determined by drying for 4 h at 150° C.


#determined with a cone-plate viscometer with a 2° cone and a plate 6 cm in diameter






The weight-averaged mean particle size increased with decreasing water content and increasing viscosity.
The compositions of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 7 to 9 were then spin-coated onto a glass plate by spinning for 6 s at 800 rpm and then 50 s at 1500 rpm followed by drying for 30 minutes at 25° C. followed by 5 minutes at 85° C. Further layers were coated on the spin-coated layer following the same procedure. The layers obtained by 1, 2 and 3 spin-coatings were characterized as described for INVENTION EXAMPLES 1 to 10 and the results obtained are given in Table 52.
The degree aggregation in the layers spin-coated using the compositions of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 7 to 9 was significantly greater than in the case of the layers spin-coated using the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 80 prepared using the same liquid and the process according to the present invention, despite the fact that the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 80 was not filtered prior to spin-coating.













TABLE 52








number







Comparative
of spin-
layer

surface
layer


Example
coated
thickness
aggregate
resistance
conductivity
optical density
















nr
layers
[nm]
assessment
[Ω/square]
[S/cm]
Dblue
Dgreen
Dred
Dvis



















7
1
92.4
1
1348
80
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.02



2
242.8
2
614
67
0.02
0.03
0.05
0.04














3
—
—
—
—
too heterogeneous
















8
1
100.2
1
1448
69
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02



2
190.8
2
669
78
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03














3
—
—
—
—
too heterogeneous
















9
1
81.0
1
3462
36
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.02



2
170
2–3
1702
35
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.03



3
—
2–3
—
—
0.03
0.05
0.07
0.06









The higher degree of PEDOT/PSS-aggregation in the compositions of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 7 to 9 was also reflected in the much poorer quality of the layer produced therewith than in the case of the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 80, as reflected by its not being possible to measure the surface resistance of layers prepared by 3 spin-coatings.
Furthermore, the conductivities of the layers prepared by 2 spin-coatings with the compositions of COMPARATIVE EXAMPLES 7 and 8 produced with the same aqueous PEDOT/PSS-dispersion as used for preparing the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 80 were significantly inferior to that produced with the composition of INVENTION EXAMPLE 80.
These results show the superiority of the process for solvent replacement, according to the present invention, compared with the flash-distillation method disclosed in WO 02/067273.
The present invention may include any feature or combination of features disclosed herein either implicitly or explicitly or any generalisation thereof irrespective of whether it relates to the presently claimed invention. In view of the foregoing description it will be evident to a person skilled in the art that various modifications may be made within the scope of the invention.

## Claims

1. A method for preparing a composition comprising between 0.08 and 3.0% by weight of a polymer or copolymer of a 3,4-dialkoxythiophene in which said two alkoxy groups may be the same or different or together represent an oxy-alkylene-oxy bridge optionally substituted with substituents selected from the group consisting of alkyl, alkoxy, alkyoxyalkyl, carboxy, alkylsulphonato, alkyloxyalkylsulphonato and carboxy ester groups, a polyanion and at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent from a dispersion of said polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and said polyanion in water comprising in the following order the steps of: (i) preparing a mixture comprising at least one of said non-aqueous solvents, said aqueous dispersion of said polymer or copolymer of (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) and said polyanion; and (ii) heating the mixture prepared in step (i) at a temperature of 80° C. or below until the content of water therein is reduced by at least 65% by weight.

2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the water in said mixture from step (i) is reduced by at least 80% by weight.

3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the water in said mixture from step (i) is reduced by at least 90% by weight.

4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the water in said mixture from step (i) is reduced by at least 95% by weight.

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein a dye or pigment is added in a further process step.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein said polymer or copolymer of a (3,4-dialkoxythiophene) is selected from the group consisting of:
poly(3,4-methylenedioxy-thiophene), poly(3,4-methylenedioxythiophene) derivatives,
poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene), poly(3,4-ethylenedioxy-thiophene) derivatives,
poly[3,4-(propylenedioxy)thiophene], poly[3,4-(propylenedioxy)thiophene] derivatives, poly(3,4-butylenedioxythiophene), poly(3,4-butylenedioxythiophene) derivatives and copolymers therewith.

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the water in said mixture from step (i) is reduced by at least 80% by weight.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the water in said mixture from step (i) is reduced by at least 90% by weight.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the water in said mixture from step (i) is reduced by at least 95% by weight.

10. The method according to claim 9, wherein said at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, propandiol, glycerol, diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein said polyanion is poly(styrene sulphonate).

12. The method according to claim 11, wherein the water in said mixture from step (i) is reduced by at least 90% by weight.

13. The method according to claim 1, wherein said at least one polyhydroxy non-aqueous solvent is selected from the group consisting of ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, propandiol, glycerol, diethylene glycol and triethylene glycol.