alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jones and others, Respondents, vs. Kosing, Garnishee, Appellant.

*December 17,1895*—

*January 7, 1896.*

*Garnishment: Chattel mortgagee: Sale before service: Fraud.*

A garnishee who sold his interest in the property, and parted with the possession and control of it, and applied the proceeds in payment of the defendant’s debt to him, before service of the garnishee summons, cannot be held liable therefor, whether the mortgage and bill of sale of the property by .the defendant to him were valid or invalid, or his possession was lawful or unlawful, as against other creditors of the defendant.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau ‘Claire eounty: W. F. Bailey, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

Garnishment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Wickham do Farr,*.and oral argument by *James Wickham.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Geo. O. do Fred A. Teall,*and oral argument by *Fred A. Teall.*

Maeshall, J.

The defendant, Adolph Keller, being indebted to the garnishee, *Charles Kosing,*in the sum of $1,592, gave as security a bill of sale of some merchandise, situated in his warehouse, for $1,101, and a chattel mortgage to secure the balance of $491 on the stock of goods in his .-.store, subject, however, to a mortgage thereon of $1,680, to "William Keller, another creditor. The latter thereafter sold •the store stock on his mortgage, for $2,175. Thereafter defendant, Adolph Keller, and the garnishee defendant, *Kos-ing,*made a settlement, in which it was agreed that *Kosing*should take $1,400 for his claim. He then sold his interest iln the warehouse property, and his entire claim against Adolph Keller, to William Keller, for $1,400, and took his mote therefor. After *Kosing*had parted with the possession *56of and all interest in the property by the sale to "William' Seller, this suit was brought against Adolph Keller, and *Kosing*was summoned as garnishee. Plaintiffs claimed that the chattel mortgage and bill of sale given to the latter were-made to hinder and delay the creditors of the former. Issue-was joined in the garnishee action; was tried by a jury; a. verdict rendered in plaintiffs’ favor; and judgment entered thereon, from which this appeal was taken.

It follows from the foregoing that the garnishee, *Kosmgr*having sold his interest in the property, and parted with possession and control of it, and applied the proceeds in the-payment of Adolph Keller’s debt to him, before service of" the garnishee summons, he cannot be held as garnishee,, whether the mortgage and bill of sale were valid or invalid, or his possession was lawful or unlawful, as against the-other creditors of Adolph Keller. This was distinctly held in *Spitz v. Tripp,*86 Wis. 25, which case rules this.

*By the*Oowrt— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded for a new trial.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7810

BRUCE M. FRENCH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN GREENE, Brunswick Correctional Center;

R. MCDILDA, Sergeant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District

Judge. (CA-97-1997-AM)

Submitted: February 25, 1999 Decided: March 10, 1999

Before HAMILTON, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bruce M. French, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* The district court order was filed November 24, 1998.

2

PER CURIAM:

Bruce French appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint without prejudice.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. See French v. Greene, No. CA-97-1997-AM

(E.D. Va. Nov. 30, 1998).* We further deny French’s motion for the

appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
1/ 

I 

I 

I 

l 

f ' ~ ' REF ID:A62612 

13 ~ 1955 

I 

"I 

Co~~l Arthur C. l'otG"ft)n Chiet·L ArlJ\f f;ecuri ty .Agtnpy Europe 

Aro 7:t{ : 

Bew !'or~, Bev York · 

\ 

])ear Pe'tf1 ,, 

Unde~ eepl.X'ate cover I Ul nendina yoo, by u.s. Parcel Poat through 

the Aro, a tmall token ~ 1113 appreciation ot and thank.a for 1our many courtesiea t9 mit Wile I was yow- bouae au.eat in P'ranld'urt during Maroh. ~ie gitt wiil, I hope, 'be uec;td eut'tioient~ trequentzy to aerve as a 

reminder or ~ ha.vina been with you and th& only thins; l could possibly 

have v!ahed ""re d.ifforent durina llW" viait would. have been the •Ua.te o-r 

fO'llr hea.lth. ,l d.o hope that b;y t.hie t.ime ;rou have :rui~ recovered from 

the digeattve diatru'bance whieh you bore with •uch tortitude durin,g my 

ate.y. I ree.l.1se tbe.t you must have been exc•edlllgly uncond'ortable ooat 

or the tilllt;\but de•pite this you lMre a moat graoioua ho•t· 

\ 

X had inatructed my triend in Switzer.land to ahip the thing directly 

to ~u but eomehov he got con:rused and 1 t 'Wll.B brought to me by Colonel 

iurri• who we.a here ror a lhort viait and fJB'¥ •till be around. 

I aJl1 eunr that you are aware at r:q having come a cropper on 3 April 

which landed Pt in Qeorae Washington University Hospital by ambula.nce 

and kept :me there a tu.ll month. :But I have been hCJm(t tor ten de.ye and am 

now allowed to pt u~ and get dreeeed, <hou&h I u. atill conf'ined to 

tbe eecond tloor. Within a. :rew d.aya we hope to have our nev elevator 

iuatalled and in operating condition. 'l'hia will make it very much easier 

'for El1i.a'Oeth wo ha.a to ®rt things U'P •udleas munbera of t.imea and then 

d.ow 88&1n via tha.t loDS tli&ht of ataira in the front of the house. The 

elevator is being inatall.ed vhere the bac:k •t&ircaee 1.WOd to 'bo. tbta 

Ulpl'OVem&nt i• a bit •xpenaivo but it 1JJAY ~ tor itaeJ.t it it Will mean 

rrq remaining a.nxmg thoae :present tor a t'•v )"ear•• (Miae Noxtine object• 

to my saying what X Juat aa.id l>ut I eee no x-.aon ~w not being a bit 

real11tic about the aitua.tion.) 

Plea1e let me hear trom ybu eoon aa I am amcioua to know about the 

atate ot your health. With best regard1, I a.xn, 

Attoct1one.tely- your&, 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
ex10-1.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 










 












July 27, 2011












Mr. Carl E. Berg


Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC


10050 Bandley Dr.


Cupertino, CA  95014







Re:  Amend Covenants in Loan Agreements







Dear Mr. Berg:







Valence Technology, Inc. (the “Borrower”) and Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC, are currently parties to two loan agreements: (a) the Loan Agreement dated July 17, 1990, as amended (the “Original Amended Loan Agreement) and (b) the Loan Agreement dated October 5, 2001 (the “New Loan Agreement”)(collectively the “Loan Agreements” or “Loans”).  This letter is to formally document our agreement to amend the Loan Agreements to extend the maturity dates of the Loan Agreements from September 30, 2012 to September 30, 2015. 







This letter shall serve as Amendment No. 15 to the Original Amended Loan Agreement and as Amendment No. 7 to the New Loan Agreement.







Kindly indicate your acceptance of the amendments described above by signing and returning the enclosed copy of this letter.


















	  	
 Sincerely,


	  	  
	  	
VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.


	  	  
	  	  
	  	
/s/ Robert L. Kanode


	  	
Robert L. Kanode


	  	
CEO & President


	  	  





 



	
ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

	 	
VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC.


	  	 	  
	
BERG & BERG ENTERPRISES, LLC

	 	  
	  	 	  
	  	 	  
	
/s/ Carl E. Berg

	 	
/s/ Donald E. Gottschalk


	
Carl E. Berg, Managing Member

	
Donald E. Gottschalk


	
Actin

	 	
Acting Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00265-CV

IN RE Geoffrey PAWLACZYK, Relator

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice 

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 4, 2024

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On March 25, 2024, relator filed a petition for a writ of mandamus with the trial court. The 

trial court forwarded the mandamus petition, and it was received by this court on April 11, 2024. 

This court has determined the relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Therefore, the petition for 

a writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 20-439, in the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas, the 

Honorable Kirsten B. Cohoon, presiding.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1947 

To exclude the discharge of certain Federal student loans from the calculation 

of gross income. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2015 

Mr. MERKLEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To exclude the discharge of certain Federal student loans 

from the calculation of gross income. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Income-Based Repay5 ment Debt Forgiveness Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FORGIVENESS OF CERTAIN FEDERAL STUDENT 

7 LOANS EXCLUDED FROM INCOME TAX. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 108(f) 

9 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by strikVerDate Sep 11 2014 17:56 Aug 11, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1947.IS S1947

tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1947 IS

1 ing ‘‘any student loan if’’ and all that follows and inserting 

2 ‘‘any student loan if— 

3 ‘‘(A) such discharge was pursuant to a 

4 provision of such loan under which all or part 

5 of the indebtedness of the individual would be 

6 discharged if the individual worked for a certain 

7 period of time in certain professions for any of 

8 a broad class of employers, or 

9 ‘‘(B) in the case of a loan made by the 

10 United States or an instrumentality or agency 

11 thereof, such discharge was pursuant to any 

12 Federal program or provision of Federal law 

13 which provides for income contingent or in14 come-based repayment of such loan.’’. 

15 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

16 subsection (a) shall apply to discharges of loans that occur 

17 on or after July 1, 2016. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XVI 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000351931
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             422
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       10
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          14,908
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,183
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          7,440
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         960
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,770
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,143
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,178
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 466
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (91)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (91)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (91)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.65)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-1317

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM193AD

777-57A0059 --- 10/30/08

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 47 (Wednesday, March 11, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12821]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05589]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Notice: Cancellation of Meeting Notice

March 6, 2015.
    The following Commission meeting has been cancelled. No earlier 
announcement of the cancellation was possible.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Thursday, March 5, 2015

PLACE: The Richard V. Backley Hearing Room, Room 511N, 1331 
Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20004 (enter from F Street 
entrance)

STATUS: Open

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission will consider and act upon the 
following in open session: Pocahontas Coal Co., LLC. v. Secretary of 
Labor, Docket No. WEVA 2014-202-R; and Pocahontas Coal Co., LLC v. 
Secretary of Labor, Docket Nos. WEVA 2014-642-R, et al. (Issues include 
whether the Administrative Law Judges erred in ruling that they lacked 
jurisdiction to review a Notice of Pattern of Violations and a Notice 
of Safeguard, respectively.)
    Any person attending this meeting who requires special 
accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign language 
interpreters, must inform the Commission in advance of those needs. 
Subject to 29 CFR 2706.150(a)(3) and 2706.160(d).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFO: Emogene Johnson (202) 434-9935/(202) 708-
9300 for TDD Relay/1-800-877-8339 for toll free.

Emogene Johnson,
Administrative Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2015-05589 Filed 3-9-15; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 6735-01-P
exv10w16






Exhibit 10.16




Northrop Grumman Legacy Officers Plan* Matrix — Plan Year July 1, 2011 — June 30, 2012




	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	Plan Features	 	 	Benefit	 
	 	Eligibility

	 	 	Employee + Spouse & Children and or Adult Children up to age 26	 
	 	Medical Plan

	 	 	Premium PPO Plan administered by Anthem Blue Cross	 
	 	Coverage

	 	 	100% coverage, for all eligible plan expenses	 
	 	Annual Deductible

	 	 	No annual deductible	 
	 	Co-payment/Co-Insurance

	 	 	No co-payment/co-Insurance	 
	 	Preventive Care Coverage

	 	 	No limits as long as procedures fall under Anthem’s Guidelines	 
	 	Prescription Drug Coverage

	 	 	Covered under Medical Plan	 
	 	Annual Deductible

	 	 	No annual deductible	 
	 	Coverage — retail 30 — day supply

	 	 	100% coverage, when network pharmacy utilized	 
	 	Coverage — mail order 90 —day supply

	 	 	100% coverage, when network pharmacy utilized	 
	 	Vision Coverage

	 	 	$500 maximum reimbursement per person, per plan year, for exams, glasses,

contact lenses	 
	 	Hearing Coverage

	 	 	Up to two hearing aids per person, per plan year	 
	 	Acupuncture and Acupressure

	 	 	20 visits (combined) — per person, per plan year	 
	 	Chiropractic Care

	 	 	40 visits per person, per plan year (in and out of network)	 
	 	Physical Therapy

	 	 	50 visits per person, per plan year (in and out of network)	 
	 	Speech Therapy

	 	 	50 visits per person, per plan year (in and out of network)	 
	 	Occupational Therapy

	 	 	50 visits per person, per plan year (in and out of network)	 
	 	Mental Health Coverage

	 	 	Mental health is 100% covered (in and out of network); Office visits —
unlimited. Inpatient treatment based on mental health, substance abuse or detox
treatment will allow a combined total of 30 days coverage with pre-authorization
or utilization review and includes out-of-network providers.	 
	 	Health Plan Lifetime Maximums

	 	 	No Lifetime Maximums for essential medical, prescription drug or mental health

benefits	 
	 	Dental Plan

	 	 	Premium PPO Plan administered by Delta Dental	 
	 	Annual Maximum

	 	 	$4,000 per person — per plan year	 
	 	Coverage

	 	 	100% coverage, for all eligible plan expenses up to annual maximum, including
Orthodontics	 
	 	Annual Deductible

	 	 	No annual deductible	 
	 	Co-payment/Co-Insurance

	 	 	No co-payment/co-Insurance	 
	 	Eligibility

	 	 	Employee only	 
	 	Life Insurance Coverage

	 	 	Company-paid basic life insurance 3x annual base salary up to a maximum of 2
million	 
	 	Accidental Death & Dismemberment
Coverage

	 	 	Company-paid basic accidental death & dismemberment insurance — 6 x Annual base
salary up to a maximum of $1 million	 
	 	Long-Term Disability (LTD)

	 	 	Company-paid basic LTD benefit of 75% of monthly base salary, up to a maximum
monthly benefit $25,000	 
	 







 




		
	*	Executive Health Plan was frozen to new participants on July 1, 2009 and renamed Legacy Officers Plan effective July 1, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of CPAC, Inc. for the period ending June 30, 2000 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000351717
<NAME> CPAC, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       3,377,968
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,034,112
<ALLOWANCES>                                   716,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,445,165
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            40,368,015
<PP&E>                                      37,343,160
<DEPRECIATION>                              17,057,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              76,508,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,219,497
<BONDS>                                      8,934,309
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,653
<OTHER-SE>                                  52,061,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                76,508,014
<SALES>                                     26,881,360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            26,881,360
<CGS>                                       15,286,036
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,286,036
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             286,451
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,136,115
<INCOME-TAX>                                   809,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,327,115
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,327,115
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24


</TABLE>
<Page>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


<Table>
<Caption>

SUBSIDIARY                                   JURISDICTION OF INCORPORATION
----------                                   -----------------------------
<S>                                          <C>
SatCon Applied Technology, Inc.              Delaware
SatCon Power Systems, Inc.*                  Delaware
SatCon Electronics, Inc.**                   Delaware
Ling Electronics, Ltd.                       United Kingdom
SatCon Power Systems Canada, Ltd.            Canada

</Table>


----------

*     Also doing business as "MagMotor" and "Ling Electronics"
**    Also doing business as "Film Microelectronics, Inc."
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 206 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to reauthorize the State infrastructure 

bank program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 21, 2015 

Ms. AYOTTE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to reauthorize the 

State infrastructure bank program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Local Transportation 

5 Infrastructure Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOCAL TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE PRO7 GRAM. 

8 Section 610 of title 23, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (d)— 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 206 IS

1 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking subpara2 graph (A) and inserting the following: 

3 ‘‘(A) 10 percent of the funds apportioned 

4 to the State for each of fiscal years 2015 and 

5 2016 under each of sections 104(b)(1), 

6 104(b)(2), and 144; and’’; 

7 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘2005 

8 through 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 and 2016’’; 

9 (C) in paragraph (3), by striking ‘‘2005 

10 through 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 and 2016’’; 

11 and 

12 (D) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘section 

13 133(d)(3)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 133(d)(4)’’; 

14 (2) in subsection (h)(2)— 

15 (A) in the first sentence, by striking 

16 ‘‘shall’’ and inserting ‘‘shall not’’; and 

17 (B) in the second sentence, by striking 

18 ‘‘shall’’ and inserting ‘‘shall not’’; and 

19 (3) in subsection (k), by striking ‘‘2005 through 

20 2009’’ and inserting ‘‘2015 and 2016’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
99-1245.

#### Anderson v. Indian Valley School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

Tuscarawas App. Nos. 1998AP120123 and 1998AP120124. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that no conflict exists within the meaning of S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(2)(B). This cause is therefore dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.
SECTION F

TOLERANCE PROPOSAL

Tolerances are proposed for combined residues of spiromesifen 

### : 2-oxo-3-(2,4,6- trimethylphenyl)-1-oxasp iro[4.4]non-3-en-4-yl 3,3-dimethylbutanoate , its enol metabolite (4-hydroxy- 3-(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-1-oxaspiro [4.4 ] non-3-en-2-one) and its metabolites containing the 4-hydroxymethy l moiety (4-hydroxy-3-[4-(hydroxymethyl)- 2,6-dimethyl phenyl]-1-oxaspiro[4.4]non-3-en-2-one) and its conjugates, calculated as parent compound equivalents, on the following commodities from crops grown as rotational crops:

Rotational Crop Commodity Plant-Back

Interval Proposed Tolerance (Ppm)

vegetable , bulb, (Group 3-07) 30 0.09