alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w10







Exhibit 10.10





To whom it might concern:




From: DVB Bank SE (acting as Agent on behalf of the Lenders)




Date: 16th of June 2010




Re: Compliance Confirmation Letter




We herewith in our capacity as Lenders in Loan Agreement dated 10 September 2007, as amended by a
First Supplemental Agreement dated 10 January 2008 and as further amended by a Second Supplemental
Agreement dated 23 January 2009, made between (1) Drillship Hydra Owners Inc. and Drillship Paros
Owners Inc. as joint and several borrowers, (2) the banks listed in schedule 1 thereto as lenders,
(3) the banks listed in schedule 1 thereto as arrangers and (4) DVB Bank SE (formerly known as DVB
Bank AG (“DVB”) as agent, underwriter and security agent, in respect of a loan facility of up to
US$230,000,000, (the “Loan Agreement”), herewith confirm that Dryships Inc. (and defined Borrowing
entities) are in full compliance with the Loan Agreement (as supplemented / addended from time
during the duration of the loan).




This
Compliance Confirmation is valid until July 15th, 2010.




Signed:




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 

	/s/ Sjur Agdestein

	 	 	 	/s/ Philip Froyland
	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Sjur Agdestein

	 	 	 	Philip Froyland	 	 
	Managing Director

	 	 	 	Vice President	 	 
	Offshore Drilling

	 	 	 	Offshore Drilling
<PAGE>
                                                                     EXHIBIT 12.


               GREEN TREE FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

               COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            Year Ended December 31
                       ------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           1996           1995          1994            1993          1992
                       ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
<S>                    <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Earnings:
  Earnings before
    income taxes       $323,829,000   $409,628,000   $302,131,000   $200,537,000   $118,806,000

Fixed charges:
  Interest             $ 70,050,000   $ 57,313,000   $ 41,619,000   $ 51,155,000   $ 44,868,000
  One-third rent          2,888,000      2,034,000      1,688,000      1,483,000      1,652,000
                       ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
                         72,938,000     59,347,000     43,307,000     52,638,000     46,520,000
                       ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
                       $396,767,000   $468,975,000   $345,438,000   $253,175,000   $165,326,000
                       ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Fixed charges:
   Interest            $ 70,050,000   $ 57,313,000   $ 41,619,000   $ 51,155,000   $ 44,868,000 
   One-third rent         2,888,000      2,034,000      1,688,000      1,483,000      1,652,000
                       ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
                       $ 72,938,000   $ 59,347,000   $ 43,307,000   $ 52,638,000   $ 46,520,000
                       ============   ============   ============   ============   ============

Ratio of earnings
  to fixed charges (1)         5.44           7.90           7.98           4.81           3.55
                              =====          =====          =====          =====          =====
</TABLE>

(1)  For purposes of computing the ratio, earnings consist of earnings before
     income taxes plus fixed charges.
1 The Honorable George F. Gunn, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. ___________ No. 95-2597

___________ Lonnie D. Snelling, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Chrysler Motor Corporation; * Stephen P. McGlynn; John Doe, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: February 7, 1996 Filed: February 13, 1996

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Lonnie D. Snelling appeals the District Court's 1 dismissal of his diversity action under Missouri law. Having carefully reviewed the entire record and the parties' submissions, we conclude the judgment of the District Court was correct. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The parties' motions for sanctions are denied.-2- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
1 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION JULY 21, 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT : Burden estimate associated with proposed rule to amend 40 CFR part 98, subpart

I FROM : Shaun Ragnauth

Climate Change Division, U.S. EPA TO : Kirsten Cappel

Climate Change Division , U.S. EPA The 2009 final GHG reporting rule (2009 final rule) was signed by EPA Administrator Lis a Jackson on September 22, 2009 and published in the Federal Register on October 30, 2009 (7 4 FR 56260, October 30, 2009). The 2009 final rule, which became effective on December 29, 2009, included reporting of GHGs from various facilities and suppliers, consistent with the 2008 Consolidated Appropriations Act. Subsequent notices were published in 2010 finalizing the requirements for additional subparts

. The requirements for subpart I were finalized in a December 1, 2010 notice (75 FR 74774, December 1, 2010). The source categories in 40 CFR part 98 cover approximately 85

- 90 percent of U.S. GHG emissions through reporting by direct emitters, as well as suppliers of certain products that would result in GHG emission when released, used, or oxidized, and th ose that geologically sequester or otherwise inject CO2 underground. EPA is proposing to amend specific provisi ons in 40 CFR part 98, subpart I to correct certain technical and editorial errors that have been identified since promulgation and to clarify or propose amendments to certain provisions that have been the subject of ques tions from reporting entities. EPA does not anticipate an increase in burden resulting from these proposed changes because this action is clarifying the intent of the requir ements finalized in subpart I. In finalizing the reporting requirements for fluorinated heat transfer fluids ( HTFs ) , EPA did not intend to exclude fluorocarbons that can enter the atmosphere under the conditions in which HTFs are used in the elec tronics manuf acturing industry. EPA’s burden estimates were based on reporting of all fluorinated HTFs , therefore the clarification of intent does not impose additional burden on reporters. Section 4.3, pg 4

- 5, of the Economic Impact Analysis for the2

Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions

- F

- Gases: Subparts I, L, DD, QQ, SS outlines EPA’s compliance cost estimates for subpart I reporting. As a result, the original national cost estimates for subpart I remain $ 2.9 million in the First Year and $ .96 million in subsequent years.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1999
<CASH>                                          23,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,625,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,441,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,898,000
<PP&E>                                       3,248,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              22,772,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,971,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       238,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,367,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                22,772,000
<SALES>                                     16,378,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,378,000
<CGS>                                       11,872,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,958,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             245,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (697,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (697,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (697,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-19-00391-CV

__________________

DONALD NEWLAND, Appellant

VS.

MONTGOMERY CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 284th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-07-09249-CV

__________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Donald Newland filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. Appellant 

states in his motion that the parties have settled the case. This motion is voluntarily 

made by appellant prior to any decision of this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

No other party filed notice of appeal. We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM
2

Submitted on December 9, 2020

Opinion Delivered December 10, 2020

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
99-1415.

#### State v. Fincher.

Franklin App. No. 97APA04-494. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7366

MICHAEL W. SLOAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JANE KIMBRIEL; JAMES M. LESLIE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, i.e., U.S.

Attorney's Office; FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District

Judge. (CA-01-347-3)

Submitted: May 8, 2003 Decided: May 21, 2003

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Michael W. Sloan, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant

Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael W. Sloan appeals the district court’s orders accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge, denying relief on his

mandamus petition, granting judgment to the Defendants on his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint, and denying his motion for

reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Sloan v. United

States, No. CA-01-347-3 (E.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2002; July 10, 2002; Aug.

14, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 10.73


                     2000-1 AMENDMENT TO THE
      FLEMING COMPANIES, INC. ASSOCIATE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


     The Fleming Companies, Inc. Associate Stock Purchase Plan
(the "Plan") is hereby amended as follows:

                               I.

     Section 2.1(n) of the Plan is hereby amended to read as
follows:

          "The word 'Participant' shall mean an Associate
          (i) who executes with the Company an Option
          Agreement on or prior to a Granting Date, (ii) who
          on such Granting Date was employed by the
          Employer, and (iii) whose customary employment is
          more than 20 hours per week and more than five
          months in any calendar year.  The word
          'Participant' shall also include the legal
          representative of a deceased Participant, and a
          Participant who, within three months prior to the
          end of the applicable Purchase Period for which he
          is a Participant, terminates his employment with
          the Employer.  'Disability' for purposes of this
          Subsection (n) shall mean a physical or mental
          condition which, in the judgment of the Committee,
          totally and permanently prevents a Participant
          from engaging in any substantial gainful
          employment with the Employer.  A determination
          that disability exists shall be based upon
          independent medical evidence satisfactory to the
          Committee.  In the event that any Employer ceases
          to be a Subsidiary of the Company, the Associates
          of such Employer will be deemed to have terminated
          employment as of such date."

                               II.

     The second sentence of Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby
amended to read as follows:

          "A legal representative of a deceased Participant
          and a Participant who terminates employment for
          any reason within three months prior to the end of
          the applicable Purchase Period will continue to be
          a Participant in the Plan until the next
          succeeding Exercise Date unless such Participant
          or his representative (in the event of the
          Participant's death) elects to withdraw from the
          Plan pursuant to this Section 3.3."

     Except as otherwise provided in this 2000-1 Amendment to the
Fleming Companies, Inc. Associate Stock Purchase Plan
("Amendment"), the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed in all
respects.  This Amendment shall be effective as of July 1, 2000.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-13-0004290 12-DEC-2017 10:32 AM
.L.oJ ~ ~cJ.&_F(JJjjfl68981 

fJJAw " ~ "'. U1tiJ. ' . . 

;(Ju; ae UH.e.J. ~d 

r~~·'"ru 

~ 1tZ/T~'~&· - ~ l:J.JAL. PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

~ -~;;: .
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSBSB for the quarter ended Dec 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2005

/s/Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       ---------------

                                                       Robert E. Wolfe

                                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

**CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

I, Robert E. Wolfe, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSBSB for the quarter ended Dec 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSBSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 14, 2005

/s/ Robert E. Wolfe

                                                          --------------

                                                         Robert E. Wolfe

                                                         Treasurer

A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906 is retained by Advanced Oxygen Technologies, Inc. and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         705,689
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,481
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               707,183
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 792,943
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,300
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     779,643
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   792,943
<SALES>                                         84,626
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,920,754
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  176,787
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                70,937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,349
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             11,661,681
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                              11,661,681
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                11,661,681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   441.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   441.59<F1>
<FN>
<F1>EPS is per limited partnership unit.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Documentation of Voice Mail Message

To: Philip Crawford, ERG

From: Ross M. Smith, PCS Phosphate Aurora

Date: May 21 , 2012

Subject: Rock Dryer at PCS Phosphate Aurora

Following an inquiry from ERG, Ross M. Smith of PCS Phosphate Aurora left a voice mail message for Philip Crawford, ERG on Monday, May 21, 2012 . The voice mail was in regards to the rock dryer at the PCS Aurora facility. Mr. Smith stated the following:

• The rock dry er is currently used to process phosphate rock feed for the defluorinated phosphate (DFP) kilning process at the Aurora facility,

• The rock dryer was historically used to dry rock previously sold by PCS, and

• The rock dry er was historically used to dry phosphate rock for the granulated triple super phosphate (GTSP) production process. Mr. Smith stated that GTSP is no longer produced at the Aurora facility.

Mr. Smith stated that PCS Phosphate Aurora no longer sells dried pho sphate rock. Mr. Smith also noted that PCS is not aware of any other rock dryers in operation in the United
States.

1
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5 D 23

- 3168 LT Case No. 2008

- CF

- 010573

- C

_____________________________
R AYDEL A LVAREZ , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________
3.800 appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County

. Robert Segal , Judge

. Raydel Alvarez, Century, pro se

. No Appearance for Appellee.

January 2, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.

M AKAR , B OATWRIGHT , and K ILBANE , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1
                                                                     -----------


                             CHOATE, HALL & STEWART
               A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
                                 EXCHANGE PLACE
                                53 STATE STREET
                       BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS  02109-2891
                            TELEPHONE (617) 248-5000
                            FACSIMILE (617) 248-4000
                                 TELEX 49615860


                                         July 21, 1999


Innovasive Devices, Inc.
734 Forest Street
Marlborough, Massachusetts 01752-3032

Gentlemen:

     This opinion is delivered to you in connection with the registration
statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement") to be filed on July 21,
1999 by Innovasive Devices, Inc. (the "Company") under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, for registration under said Act of 100,000 shares of common
stock, $.0001 par value (the "Common Stock"), of the Company.

     We are familiar with the Company's Third Restated Articles of Organization,
as amended, its By-Laws, as amended, and its corporate minute book as well as
the Registration Statement.  We have also examined such other documents, records
and certificates and made such further investigation as we have deemed necessary
for the purposes of this opinion.

     Based upon and subject to the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the
shares of Common Stock to be sold by the Company under its 1996 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, as in effect on the date hereof, when issued against receipt of
the agreed purchase price therefor, will be legally issued, fully paid and
nonassessable.

     We understand that this opinion is to be used in connection with the
Registration Statement and consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit
to the Registration Statement.  We further consent to the reference to this firm
in the section entitled "Interests of Named Experts and Counsel" in the
Registration Statement.

                                    Very truly yours,


                                    CHOATE, HALL & STEWART