alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 12(a)


                           XEROX CREDIT CORPORATION
              COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                (In Millions)


                          Six Months Ended
                               June 30,          Year Ended December 31,
                             1998   1997     1997   1996   1995   1994   1993
Income before income taxes  $  68  $  64    $ 123  $ 123  $ 119  $ 147  $ 154

Fixed Charges:
Interest expense (2)
  Xerox debt                    6      3        3      5      6      5      4
  Other debt                  111    105      214    199    213    197    205
    Total fixed charges       117    108      217    204    219    202    209

Earnings available for
 fixed charges              $ 185  $ 172    $ 340  $ 327  $ 338  $ 349  $ 363

Ratio of earnings to
 fixed charges (1)           1.58   1.59     1.57   1.60   1.54   1.73   1.74


(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing 
total earnings available for fixed charges by total fixed charges.

(2)  Debt has been assigned to discontinued operations based on the net assets 
of the discontinued operations and the debt-to-equity ratios in accordance 
with the Company's guideline. Beginning in 1995, the amount of interest 
expense that would have been allocated to discontinued operations was 
insignificant and therefore is now being reported within continuing operations 
and included in the fixed charges. Discontinued operations consist of the 
Company's third party financing and real estate businesses.






















                                     (27)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED JUNE 30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       4,722,620
<SECURITIES>                                 3,088,602
<RECEIVABLES>                                  613,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                    40,000
<INVENTORY>                                    341,433
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,887,790
<PP&E>                                       1,393,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                 692,047
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,019,802
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          881,318
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,866
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,126,618
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,018,802
<SALES>                                      1,094,823
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,094,823
<CGS>                                          979,515
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  979,515
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,711,850
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,465,354)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,465,354)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,465,354)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.31)


</TABLE>
99-1171.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Stimmel.

On June 23, 1999, movant filed a motion for this court to issue an order requiring respondent to appear and show cause why respondent should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s July 2,1998 suspension order. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court, effective August 11, 1999, that the motion be, and is hereby, granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why he should not be found in contempt.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney Registration Office.
|FOR MORE INFORMATION                                                                            | FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------
|Contact Andra K. Black, Co- President       and Chief Financial Officer       at (515) 223-8484 | Date  June 19, 2001  

Clive, Iowa . . . StateFed Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: SFFC) announced today
final results of the modified dutch auction tender offer that expired on Monday, June 11,
2001.  A total of 493,808 shares were tendered at prices ranging from $11.50 to $13.00 per
share.  StateFed Financial Corporation purchased 231,774 of these shares, all for $11.50 per
share.  As a result of the repurchase, the Company has 1,275,326 shares issued and
outstanding.

The tender offer was commenced on May 11, 2001.  Under the terms of the offer,
StateFed Financial Corporation originally offered to repurchase up to 230,770 shares of its
common stock within a price range of $11.50 per share to $13.00 per share (with the ability
to repurchase up to an additional 2% of the outstanding shares, as desired).  The number of
shares purchased represents approximately 15% of StateFed Financial Corporation's shares
of common stock outstanding.  This share repurchase is one tool the company has utilized
in conjunction with regular cash dividends and ongoing share repurchases to enhance
stockholder value.

StateFed Financial Corporation is a savings and loan holding company based
in Clive, Iowa, and has approximately $109 million in total assets.  Its subsidiary bank, State
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Des Moines, has three banking offices serving the
Des Moines and Clive area.
THE SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR WASHINGTON

ORDERNO. 3302 Subject: Change ofthe Name ofthe Minerals Management Service to the Bureau ofOcean Energy Iv1anagemem, Regulation, and Enforcement Sec. 1 Purpose. The purpose ofthis Order is to change the name ofthe Minerals Management Service (MMS) to the Bureau ofOcean Energy Management, Regulation, andEnforcement (BOEMRE). Sec. 2 Authority. This Order is issued underthe authority ofSection 2 ofReorganization Plan No.3 of 1950 (64 Stat. 1262). as amended. Sec. 3 The Bureau ofOcean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement
a. The Minerals Management Service shall hereafter be named the Bureau ofOcean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement. b. The BOEMRE shall be headed by a director and shall be under the supervision ofthe Assistant**Secretary-~Land** and Minerals Management.
c. The BOEMRE shall exercise all authorities previously vested in the MMS. Sec. 4 Implementation. The Assistant Secretary-Land and Minerals Management and the Assistant Secretary-Policy. Management and Budget shall take all appropriate steps to implement this Order including. but not limited to:
a. Changing all references ofthe MMS to BOEMRE in the Departmental Manual: b. Promulgating a briefrule in the Federal Register changing all references ofthe MMS to BOEMRE in the Department's regulations: and
c. Notifying the Congress ofthe name change from the MMS to the BOEMRE.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2034 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2034

     To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional 
 aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on 
                       the status of the victim.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2015

  Mr. Toomey introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional 
 aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on 
                       the status of the victim.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Thin Blue Line Act''.

SEC. 2. AGGRAVATING FACTORS FOR DEATH PENALTY.

    Section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting after paragraph (16) the following:
            ``(17) Killing or targeting of law enforcement officer.--
                    ``(A) The defendant killed or attempted to kill, in 
                the circumstance described in subparagraph (B), a 
                person who is authorized by law--
                            ``(i) to engage in or supervise the 
                        prevention, detention, investigation, or 
                        prosecution, or the incarceration of any person 
                        for any criminal violation of law;
                            ``(ii) to apprehend, arrest, or prosecute 
                        an individual for any criminal violation of 
                        law; or
                            ``(iii) to be a firefighter or other first 
                        responder.
                    ``(B) The circumstance referred to in subparagraph 
                (A) is that the person was killed or targeted--
                            ``(i) while he or she was engaged in the 
                        performance of his or her official duties;
                            ``(ii) because of the performance of his or 
                        her official duties; or
                            ``(iii) because of his or her status as a 
                        public official or employee.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 033-75934, 333-04280, 333-08047, 333-75339, 333-43802, 333-67504, 333-100753, 333-125882,
333-125883, 333-145334, 333-145337, 333-150069 and 333-152998) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-05939,
333-37921, 333-87157, 333-94859, 333-48936, 333-67328, 333-103950, 333-111522, 333-116533,
333-128527, 333-136673, 333-139897, 333-145335, 333-150070 and 333-159010) of our report dated March 11, 2010 relating to
the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule for the three years ended December 31, 2009 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009 of Satcon Technology Corporation and its subsidiaries, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/
Caturano and Company, P.C.

Boston,
Massachusetts

March 11,
2010

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dane A. Miller, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Biomet, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
   to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
   such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
   covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
   of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
   registrant and have:

  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

  (b) [Not Required]

  (c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
      of the period covered by this report, based on such evaluation: and

  (d) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting that occured during the registrant's most recent
      fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
      materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
   our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting,
   to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board
   of directors:

  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting.

Date: 1/13/2004                                /s/ Dane A. Miller
      ---------                                ------------------
                                               Dane A. Miller, Ph.D.
                                               President and
                                               Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-20830

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DAVID VASSER; SHIRLEY ADGER,

Defendants-Appellants.

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(4:08-cr-00640-5)

Before JONES, Chief Judge, WIENER and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Defendants-Appellants David Vasser andShirley Adger were among those

charged in a 12-count grand jury indictment that resulted from a large and

lengthy mortgage fraud operation. Adger was charged with one count of

conspiring to commit mail and wire fraud and a second count of substantive wire

fraud. Vasser was charged with five counts comprising conspiracy to commit

mail and wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and engaging in

monetary transactions involving criminally derived property. Both Adger and

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 8, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-20830 Document: 00511881900 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2012
No. 10-20830

Vasser were convicted by a jury on all counts, and both raise numerous claims

of error on appeal.

Adger contends that the district court erred in refusing her requested jury

instructions on good faith and intent, and complains of the sufficiency of the

evidence to convict her. She also claims that she is harmed by a large number

of omissions, as unintelligible, from the record of the trial proceedings. Vasser

asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting extrinsic evidence,

under Rule 404(b), of similar fraudulent acts he committed shortly before the

beginning of the instant conspiracy, and of plain error in giving a Rule 404(b)

limiting instruction only at the conclusion of the trial. The defendants also

assert that the district court erred in allowing marker tags to go to the jury on

various documentary exhibits and in admitting broker files from the offices of

Motown Mortgage Group into evidence.

A careful review of the record in this case and of the briefs of the parties,

as well as oral argument by able counsel for both defendants, coupled with our

consideration of the facts and the law as revealed thereby and as set forth in the

appellate briefs of the parties, satisfies us that the evidence was sufficient to

support the convictions of both defendants on all counts and that each error

claimed by the defendants either did not constitute reversible error or, at most,

constituted harmless error. Consequently, the convictions of both DefendantsAppellants should be, and hereby are, 

AFFIRMED. 

2

Case: 10-20830 Document: 00511881900 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2012
•1111.· ···· 1 nd ; ;•if !ut.V!~ i1t•(·n, :·1,1HI. l oru.Jl!~ ._,"(' {'1111.r:--:n 

;_.I! ·1 ·j, '1. I I. 

~'/0 (H'l'~-,(~j "-''~~"; ·1;1vr> 11q ::.· ·rio11~.> (_~11f11nl.n.inLs~ .1.1,c! 

.L..t.~ '.:i:~ 1l1·1 i1nt ;.-~f-!1:n :~n ....,~l'r··r ln1s:~ ... 

,,' C: : 11.•f It "t.i ic~ :·1ontJ1 t 1 J.' ,_'r •tll'llP r'~ i 11 [·:rn.1·.t"l\1 • J t. '

1"/:l.S ;"t Oi Ii 1 1.1 • dj_ F !l.f""•' r0-

;1,i.>.LC? :1s +.l1C! i·.'n~i.t.!1.1,1· ',vas 1msenson~11lly cnl<l, ;:11.cl n11r 11m>' .'l•»•r·kwni; 

11-::1.!1 11oi". r1•;HI.,\ .. , .-::o :·,:1J\l". ;-11! 'ind t.o .. ·i.:.~:.\- :-1.t a :toi"i1?.l. 's0 1tln.11an:nd 

\·ri.Ll ~-~~o t)n.ck "f.l1cre ntt ..:\.1Jril l::;t,, l.\·1r n. con!d.n nf i.-tP1·~:<:.~. i~a.rl 

1h.lJ1rdn and f1i.s ,_._.,,,: l_v '.v.i. i. I. .i(lill llS, :mr_I_ \vr-: '.v.il.l. ;;'"'"'" 

iiolidn,vs t<F"<·{·.l1ur. 

And ·:,ow :·•.rr> :,''1Hr n·w1·1 p_l;1n::;;, d.o ·.-.n c~x- '""+· Lil c:1H:11~ t.n Llii s ::cicle 

.,f 1·.i 1 C! Atln.ntic ........ 

'""' '.'C1ll kllO\I, h'O \·!<'t tld 

be :nu::;t ho.nny i;o havr~ c;_ r:t1nncc ·Lo l1avo \'"011 :·1 .. s C•lll' gues+.s~ :it :i.s 

t.iio 1 onn: a ·t:.i 111P. :~ir:c1! :·•011 were l11~rP. l ·1st. 

(hlr l>.l:i.ns 't'i•r' i;lw ;;:;111tflP.l' nr0 'lllci>r,nrrod, :"~O \·.'f! r>'-r·nr:-•<.'.t. l-.n Jp:_1VC! 

:·,q, ,_;;.rr!ri0n ;; 1:n1mri ,i11nn l'.~ :1.illl -i-•• -. 1·r>t.nrn ·Lii1.·00 '.in1.-l·.1,s i :::tnr. 

·.fr~ :,<>"!'" i.n li::v<'• 1H•·1·i.• 1 .,_11ci. "-··r ,.;iil.lr0n ·.;1-til 11s 1 ·.! p, ;;1w:.irn· 

;_1wricl :_:: ·-·:•· . .-:-.i.n." 'L . · i.vorr'P frn11J her !1u:olin.rnl. ';fJ1ich n'' c-11;w2c ls 

"· :'.:·ul ·f.iii.llf"., i··11 t-. w.1 i.cil I 11ndcrf_'. l;[111d i.~~ ::·,,1• f·.i10 IH·St,, /nr :1. 1.1 

<;1i11(~r·1·ncll ,:._~:~:i:n+, ·:_'nr ~'· .. rt,. There is 11n ;_~:.-T.rc.L n 1 1·!-·n1-: ·1.n· ...-nl\'"0rl ~ 

.111.: i_·::. i.:.; 1111 :·c~ ··rirl :arimlc; incrnnnn.t.n.t)j.J.j_ V-.-. 

::n ·:-,1c:11 ••rnid.r~nr.; ii<>t·.-:·. :ind wo .ilonr~ Lo !in :1.1i.lr> ~.n c<d.cl>r::.te n11r 

1~·11·:--; Li_t•IG. 

·,·fn ;1~1V(• _;1: 111 :l \:~~r·' ,_···!l1.l \V.l.rrL<·r. ~1 .. Jltl tll(~ o:.itlf1: l.:1.~:·;·: ii~ ~·11 1~11 -~'rn·',C'!Tl 

,·)\tc~r •. i.-t. i.n Li1c-? :~f~1:n~HL t:i.111G tilli ~ 11: .~-~ i,~1~1:•nt (h.l ill i".:.is C~Prd;11r,-. 

"!Utf.~:· J."c.~ ~Ul<i i .. ;\! ~:~il()\-j" i .'·; l•l<"?lt.ilU"' ~ (l..'·n· .• ··::f'! .'.1CP' 1".'o .i:'nr ;1n •·;•_r"'J"\r ::·: •l'illf! 

.11d a :~:·\it.I :·~ill !lri<~r~ ;=.~~ +.J\,.! .l..1.:.L :-.111·,·r~ ;: 11; 1 .. 1•r·s ~-rt ~,\.;1_ (i_0n int:vc~ beru1 

,-.,1._, .. 1.·:ul i.1t(L<:·f;d • 

. lln "..rri tc ~; .. <111 '"11:L 1.--.·1:. us i<;ncnr fin•; ."rn1 haYC ~ ... ,_•11. 

1·;ith aJ:'t'r:ct.i 011w1:,c"! 1·r•1·<i.nl.s J.'rn1:1 11s ;,,,i',;,. 

,_·; i.n ,~, · r ·•· lv 

-r (.r .:r '--- .._. -· . ..,." 

t"pproved for Release by NSA on 08-05-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our
reports dated April 8, 2016, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Trinity Biotech plc on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015. We
consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the following Registration Statements of Trinity Biotech plc:



|          |  |             |            |  |                |  |            | 
|--------- |  | ----------- | ---------- |  | -------------- |  | ---------- | 
|Form Type |  | File Number |            |  | Effective Date | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-7762   |  |                |  | 10/10/1997 | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-124384 |  |                |  | 4/28/2005  | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-166590 |  |                |  | 5/6/2010   | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-182279 |  |                |  | 6/22/2012  | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-195232 |  |                |  | 4/11/2014  | 
|Form F-3  |  |             | 333-203555 |  |                |  | 4/22/2015  | 



|                  
|------------------
|/s/ GRANT THORNTON
|Dublin, Ireland   
|                  
|April 8, 2016
Commodity 

2006 

Pounds 

Applied

2007 

Pounds 

Applied

2008 

Pounds 

Applied

BROCCOLI 1.99

CAULIFLOWER 10.61

CUCUMBER (PICKLING, CHINESE, ETC.) 59.28

ENDIVE (ESCAROLE) 3.19

LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 253.33

LEAFY VEGETABLES (ALL OR UNSPEC) 56.25

LETTUCE, HEAD (ALL OR UNSPEC) 71222.83 59158.76

LETTUCE, LEAF (ALL OR UNSPEC) 77.80 64777.33 54504.79

MUSTARD, GENERAL 9.97

N‐GRNHS GRWN TRNSPLNT/PRPGTV MTRL 0.02 33.23 34.99

N‐OUTDR GRWN CUT FLWRS OR GREENS 1.99

N‐OUTDR GRWN TRNSPLNT/PRPGTV MTRL 10.96 4.15

ORNAMENTAL TURF (ALL OR UNSPEC) 15.00

PEPPERS (FRUITING VEGETABLE), (BELL,CHILI, ETC.) 10.77 821.26 1018.60

SPINACH 9.97 1.52

SQUASH (SUMMER) 1.99

TOMATILLO 63.05

TOMATO 252.20 772.71 800.31

TOMATOES, FOR PROCESSING/CANNING 415.97 388.05

VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL 2.03

WATERMELONS 340.33 403.53

Grand Total 340.79 138527.88 116670.09

Date Prepared: November 24, 2010

Cal DPR Data: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/purmain.htm

Empty cells indicate no available usage.

Propamocarb HCl(119302) Cal. DPR Usage Data 

Publicly available data from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation

(CADPR) was used to produce the following table outlining the pounds of Limonene

used in California over the three most recent years available (2005 ‐ 2008).