alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report), I, Bradley D. Slye, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                |                                                    
|--------------- | ---------------------------------------------------
|August 13, 2010 | /s/ Bradley D. Slye                                
|                | Bradley D. Slye                                    
|                | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



---
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Maj ority Opinion and
Memorandum Dissenting Opinion filed March 14 , 202 4

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 22

- 00641

- CV

ELITE TOWNHOMES, LLC AND SOUHAIL H

. ADAM , Appellant s

V.

INTOWN CONSTRUCTION GROUP, L LC , Appellee

On A ppeal from the 234th Di st rict Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2022

- 06530



### MEMORANDUM DISSENTING OPINION

W hi le I otherwise agree with r evers ing the trial court ’ s interlocutory order

,
there is no cas e in this court to rem an d to the trial c ou rt because this is an

interlocutory appea l.

As Chief Justice Calver t famous ly wrot e , “ A correct draft of a judgment t o
be included in an opinion which has been written with care should be the final

challe n ge to the writing judge

. ” Robert W. Calvert, Appe ll ate Court Judgme nts or2 Strange Things Happe n on the Way to Judgment

, 6 T ex . Tech L. Rev. 915, 925

( 1975). I dissent to the portion of this court ’ s judgment pur porting to remand

something that is not here.

/s/ Char le s A. Spain
Jus t i c e

P an e l cons i st s of Just ices Spain, Poissant, and W i l s o n (Spain, J., dissenting)

.
REF ID:A64376 

Attached Draft ot NS,A Regula.t1on Number 113-1 

s/ JJJST. Mr. J'riedma.n 

S/.A!JST Capt Roltwick 

Dc/S Capt Agnew 

P/P 

LOO 

COMP 3 Bov 1954 

O.D. WiltJon, Jr/0014/60286/riba 

l. The attached draft of BSA Regulation l'iuln1>@r ll3-11 Program 

Management,. is submitted tor cOll'.DOOnts .m./or concurrence. 

2. In vriev of time 1indte.tion1 it i• requested that coinmunica.tiona 

from. Members of P.BA. be torwarded to this Ot:t1ce aa aoon aa :possible. 

Inol: 

cy ot NS.A 

Reg 113·1 

Concur. 

OTIS D. WILSON, Jr. 

Executive Secretary 

Program and :Budget Advisor• 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a - - = ---=-~---- -- ~~- ---
REF ID:A6.ft41 

.,., 

bote11or v. x. " Viaaatt, Ir. 

Yale Vn1••:zr.•1tJ" 

In Ba'fen, Connecticut 

Deatt Vimatt1 

I rece1Y•4 thia d&f through tl1e courtear ot 

vi-. Brigb&•, a cop1 ot h1• paper 11Udgar Allan Poe•a 

Co.at:r1but1oa• to Aleaadei- • • Weekl~r aeeael1gel"• and 

l am quite enthue1a•t1c about what be baa done. 

I aote oa page 6 tba t an ax-Uc: le bJ J'OU is 

scheduled to appear ill the p-q.blica1;1on of the aodern 

Language Asaoc1&t1oa ot America ancl I hope ;that 

7ou will not torget ••• · I should ~~1ke at leaet 

three repl"ints. 

With V&'/!7 best regard.a, I am 

S1rleex-el7 70Ul"s, 

SPSJ:S·T 

'.· 

Wtlliam F. Priedma.n Dii~ector~ ot Communic&t1ou 

Research 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuant to ·E. 0. 1352§ 

\ 

I 

I • 

't 

l• 

I
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Brachtl, Megan

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:53 PM

To: Sutton, Lisa

Subject: FW: SSM SIP Call Final Action Notification to States

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

Megan V. Brachtl, Group Leader

State and Local Programs Group

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

(919) 541‐2648

brachtl.megan@epa.gov

From: Daly, Carl  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:52 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan

Cc: Clark, Adam

Subject: SD: SSM SIP Call Final Action Notification to States

FYI ‐ SD

Carl Daly, Director

Air Program

303‐312‐6416

From: Daly, Carl  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 9:40 AM

To: Brian.Gustafson

Cc: Monica Morales

Subject: SSM SIP Call Final Action Notification to States

Brian

This email is a follow‐up to my update on the SAD call about the startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM) SIP call.  South

Dakota will be included in the SIP call.

The information below is from headquarters.

The EPA Administrator signed a final action today to ensure states have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources

at all times, including when the source is operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).  

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the

treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are treated

in state implementation plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action, EPA has

revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.
2

The EPA is calling for 36 states, including your state, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure

consistency with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy.  Your state will have 18 months to submit revisions

of your state plan to EPA. Your state’s revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22, 2016.  

As part of our notification to your state about this final SIP call, attached to this email is a letter from the EPA’s Acting

Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe. To inform you of the details on the final action, including

the specific SIP provisions your state needs to address, we have posted a pre‐publication version of the action on our

website at:  http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html.  

Carl Daly, Director

Air Program

303‐312‐6416
Docket No. FAA-2013-0422
#### Fritsche, Respondent, vs. Fritsche, Appellant.

*May 26*

June *21, 1890.*

*Easements: Ejectment.*

*An*action of ejectment cannot be maintained to recover a mere easement.

APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for *Crawford*County.

Tbe case is stated in tbe opinion.

For tbe appellant there was a brief by *Webster do*Miller, and oral argument by *D. Webster.*

For tbe respondent tbe cause was submitted on tbe brief of *Fuller do Wa/rd.*

LyoN, J.

This is an action of ejectment brought to recover a private right of way claimed by tbe plaintiff on certain lands of tbe defendant. Tbe right thus claimed was established by tbe judgment of this court affirming tbe judgment of tbe circuit court in an action at law brought by tbe plaintiff against defendant for obstructing such right of way. Tbe opinion in that action is filed herewith. See *Fritsche v.*Fritsche, *ante,*p. 266.

After tbe judgment of tbe circuit court for tbe plaintiff was entered in that action, affirming tbe existence of such *271right of way, the defendant again obstructed the same at the same point, and thereupon this action of ejectment was brought to recover such right or easement. The circuit court held that the judgment in the former action is *res adjudicates*of plaintiff’s right, and thereupon gave judgment herein in his favor, from which the defendant appeals. The ruling, was doubtless correct, and the judgment would also be correct if ejectment- could be maintained to recover a mere easement. But it is well settled, both on principle and by authority, that the action cannot be maintained for such purpose. It was so held in *Racine v. Crotsenberg,*61 Wis. 481. The subject is there quite fully considered, and it is unnecessary to repeat the discussion here. The remedy of the plaintiff is by action at law for damages, or, if ■the wrong be persisted in, by a suit in equity for an injunction.

*By the*Court.— The judgment is reversed, and the cause will be remanded with directions to the circuit court to dismiss the complaint.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS



We have not been able to obtain, after reasonable efforts, the written consent
from our former independent public accountant, Arthur Andersen LLP, to our
incorporation by reference on Form 10-K pertaining to D&K Healthcare Resources,
Inc. of their report dated August 7, 2001 with respect to the financial
statements and the supplemental schedule of D&K Healthcare Resources, Inc.
included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2001, as
required by Section 7 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Accordingly,
you will be unable to recover amounts sought in any action against Arthur
Andersen LLP, the former independent public accountant, pursuant to the
Securities Act of 1933 and the regulations thereunder, and therefore any right
of recovery may be limited as a result of the lack of that consent.





















                                       49
Amendment to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.7.1 
 WHITEGLOVE HEALTH, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 2011 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 The 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of WhiteGlove Health, Inc. (the “2011 Plan”) is hereby amended,
effective as of June 17, 2011, as follows: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 1.3(a) of Article I of the
2011 Plan is hereby amended to be read in its entirety as follows: 
 The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may
be issued under the Plan shall be 350,000 shares, plus (1) any shares of Common Stock that, as of the Registration Date, have been reserved but not issued pursuant to any awards granted under the Company’s 2007 Stock Option/Stock Issuance
Plan, as amended (the “Existing Plan”) and are not subject to any awards granted thereunder, and (2) any shares of Common Stock subject to stock options or similar awards granted under the Existing Plan that
expire or otherwise terminate without having been exercised in full and shares of Common Stock pursuant to awards granted under the Existing Plan that are forfeited to or repurchased by the Company, with the maximum number of shares of Common Stock
to be added to the Plan pursuant to clauses (1) and (2) equal to 2,367,250 shares of Common Stock. 
 2. Except as
modified by this Amendment, all the terms and provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, WhiteGlove Health, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer as of June 17, 2011. 
  


	
	WHITEGLOVE HEALTH, INC.
	
	/s/    William J. Kerley    
	 William J. Kerley
 Chief
Financial Officer
**EIS_Identifier SO2 (tons)**  **State County**  **Site Name**

8178911 22,393.0NH Merrimack PSNH - MERRIMACK STATION 7287811 1,707.9 NH Rockingham PSNH - SCHILLER STATION 7199811 309.0NH Grafton DARTMOUTH COLLEGE 7288011 307.6NH Rockingham PSNH - NEWINGTON STATION 7868211 169.8NH Grafton DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK MEDICAL CENTER 7513011 153.1 NH Sullivan APC PAPER COMPANY INC 7758711 140.8NH Hillsborough MONADNOCK PAPER MILLS INC 7866711 127.0NH Coos GORHAM PAPER & TISSUE LLC 14563211 66.3 NH Grafton NORTH COUNTRY ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 7301111 58.6NH Merrimack WHEELABRATOR CONCORD COMPANY LP 14563811 48.5 NH Merrimack NH DOC NEW HAMPSHIRE STATE PRISON 7301211 33.4NH Sullivan WHEELABRATOR CLAREMONT COMPANY LP 7237811 32.5 NH Strafford TURNKEY RECYCLING & ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERP 7868411 28.4NH Grafton PLYMOUTH COLLEGE COGENERATION LP 9369111 22.4NH Hillsborough Manchester 14563511 21.6NH Hillsborough WARWICK MILLS INC 14563011 19.6NH Coos MOUNT CARBERRY LANDFILL 7287411 13.7 NH Strafford UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 14564111 13.6NH Rockingham NEXTERA ENERGY SEABROOK LLC 7287911 12.8 NH Rockingham NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY 8192611 11.3 NH Hillsborough FOUR HILLS LANDFILL 7458411 8.4NH Rockingham GRANITE RIDGE ENERGY LLC 7456811 6.7 NH Merrimack CONCORD STEAM CORPORATION 7458511 6.1 NH Rockingham NEWINGTON ENERGY LLC 7757611 5.6NH Hillsborough ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC 14563111 4.7 NH Grafton INDECK ENERGY - ALEXANDRIA LLC 5209811 3.2 NH Cheshire SMITHS MEDICAL ASD INC - PRODUCTION AVE 9362511 2.5 NH Strafford LYDALL FILTRATION/SEPARATION INC 14564311 2.0NH Strafford MIDDLETON BUILDING SUPPLY 7866811 1.8 NH Coos TILLOTSON RUBBER COMPANY INC 7758611 1.3 NH Grafton BRIDGEWATER POWER COMPANY

http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/net/2011inventory.html Data source: EPA's 2011 National Emissions Inventory Database, ver. 2.

Listing of SO2 industrial sources that emitted 1 ton or more of SO2 in 2011.**Facility Type City** 

Electricity Generation via Combustion BOW Electricity Generation via Combustion PORTSMOUTH Institutional (school, hospital, prison, etc.) HANOVER Electricity Generation via Combustion NEWINGTON Institutional (school, hospital, prison, etc.) LEBANON Pulp and Paper Plant CLAREMONT Pulp and Paper Plant BENNINGTON Pulp and Paper Plant BERLIN Landfill BETHLEHEM Municipal Waste Combustor PENACOOK Institutional (school, hospital, prison, etc.) CONCORD Municipal Waste Combustor CLAREMONT Landfill ROCHESTER Electricity Generation via Combustion PLYMOUTH Airport Manchester NEW IPSWICH Landfill BERLIN Institutional (school, hospital, prison, etc.) DURHAM SEABROOK Mineral Processing Plant PORTSMOUTH Landfill NASHUA Electricity Generation via Combustion LONDONDERRY Steam/Heating Facility CONCORD Electricity Generation via Combustion NEWINGTON Breweries/Distilleries/Wineries MERRIMACK Electricity Generation via Combustion ALEXANDRIA KEENE Pulp and Paper Plant ROCHESTER Lumber/Sawmill MIDDLETON DIXVILLE NOTCH Electricity Generation via Combustion BRIDGEWATER
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2005 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prevent concurrent receipt 

of unemployment benefits and Social Security disability insurance, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 6, 2015 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title II of the Social Security Act to prevent 

concurrent receipt of unemployment benefits and Social 

Security disability insurance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Social Security Dis5 ability Insurance and Unemployment Benefits Double Dip 

6 Elimination Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2005 IS

1 SEC. 2. DISQUALIFICATION ON RECEIPT OF DISABILITY IN2 SURANCE BENEFITS IN A MONTH FOR WHICH 

3 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION IS RE4 CEIVED. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 223(d)(4) of the Social 

6 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 423(d)(4)) is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following: 

8 ‘‘(C)(i) If for any week in whole or in part within 

9 a month an individual is paid or determined to be eligible 

10 for unemployment compensation, such individual shall be 

11 deemed to have engaged in substantial gainful activity for 

12 such month. 

13 ‘‘(ii) For purposes of clause (i), the term ‘unemploy14 ment compensation’ means— 

15 ‘‘(I) ‘regular compensation’, ‘extended com16 pensation’, and ‘additional compensation’ (as such 

17 terms are defined by section 205 of the Federal18 State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act 

19 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note)); and 

20 ‘‘(II) trade adjustment assistance under title II 

21 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2251 et 

22 seq.).’’. 

23 (b) TRIAL WORK PERIOD.—Section 222(c) of the So24 cial Security Act (42 U.S.C. 422(c)) is amended by adding 

25 at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2005 IS

1 ‘‘(6)(A) For purposes of this subsection, an individual 

2 shall be deemed to have rendered services in a month if 

3 the individual is entitled to unemployment compensation 

4 for such month. 

5 ‘‘(B) For purposes of subparagraph (A), the term 

6 ‘unemployment compensation’ means— 

7 ‘‘(i) ‘regular compensation’, ‘extended com8 pensation’, and ‘additional compensation’ (as such 

9 terms are defined by section 205 of the Federal10 State Extended Unemployment Compensation Act 

11 (26 U.S.C. 3304 note)); and 

12 ‘‘(ii) trade adjustment assistance under title II 

13 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2251 et 

14 seq.).’’. 

15 (c) DATA MATCHING.—The Commissioner of Social 

16 Security shall implement the amendments made by this 

17 section using appropriate electronic data. 

18 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

19 this section shall apply with respect to individuals who ini20 tially apply for disability insurance benefits on or after 

21 January 1, 2016. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
At Twin Creeks, the Juniper Carbon Regeneration Kiln has installed a hypochlorite wet scrubber, which 

is equivalent to or better than any of the control devices at other facilities. The hypochlorite material acts 

to chemically react with mercury, enhancing the performance of the scrubber, and increasing the removal 

rate for mercury. 

Lone Tree 

Reond Phoenix 

Twin Creeks 

4.2.2 Capital and Energy Costs 

Existine Units. The Questionnaires submitted by precious metal mining facilities in Nevada with 

existing carbon regeneration kilns provided limited information about cost of controls. For this analysis, 

the estimated cost of mercury controls for wet scrubbers on carbon regeneration kilns is based on the 

cost estimate for the existing control system. At Twin Creeks, the wet scrubber was installed at the 

Juniper regeneration kiln in 1996, at a capital cost of $40,000. In 2003, as a result of the Nevada 

Voluntary Mercury Control Program, an additional hypochlorite wet scrubber was added at a capital cost 

of $620,000. Given the escalation in capital costs, based on the ENR Index, the escalation factors from 

1996 and 2003 are 1.40 and 1.17, respectively, which translate into a 2007 capital cost of $56,000 and 

$725,000, respectively, for these units. 

Mill Carbon Regeneration 

Kiln 

Carbon Regeneration Kiln 

Juniper Carbon 

Regeneration Kiln 

Table 11 summarizes capital costs for wet scrubbers and other control devices on carbon regeneration 

kilns at Nevada mining operations. 

61 1 

3,727 

5,650 

1450 

1204 

3000 

240 

275 

70 

572.16 

2.27 

23.89 

Wet Scrubber 

Wet Scrubber 

Wet Scrubber, 

Hypochlorite Wet Scrubber
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7681
DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus J. E. SETZER, JR., Judge, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (CA-95-851-5-CT-BO) Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996 Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Yarborough v. Setzer , No. CA-95-851-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
• 

WB.EEP.Alfl1Jm53 62 8 7,6 

SPSLG 

Legal Patents 

(Friedman & Mauborgne) 

dquarters, Services of Supply y Cff ll v SPSLG-.,- Office of the Chief Signal Officer '-',-I JC' 

Washington, D. c. 

(_in original) 

February 2, 1943. 

Mr. William F. Friedman,- 400 Lee Boulevard, 

Arlington, Virginia. 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

Inclosed herewith, in duplicate, is your joint application for a patent entitled "system for Enciphering 

Facsimilen. It comprises Petition, Specification, Oath, 

Assignment, License and a photostatic copy of the drawing. 

If this application meets with your approval, it is 

requested that you execute it by signing it with your 

first name in full at the places indicated by the attached 

tabs, before a notary public who must legalize the application by filling in the place and date of execution and 

impressing his seal at the places indicated by the attached 

tabs. 

It is requested that executed original application be 

returned to this office so that the execution of it by 

Major General Ma.uborgne may be secured after which the 

completely executed application will be filed in the United 

States Patent Office. 

The duplicate copy of the application is to be retained 

by you for your files. 

Your comments and suggestions relative to this application 

will be welcome. If they form a part of your original invention, they may be incorporated in the application by 

amendment. 

Incle - Pat. Appl. & forms . (in duplicate) 

Photostatic drawing 

Yours very truly, 

Nelson Moore 

Captain, Signal Corps 

Attorney, Office of Legal Director 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
l Sig.!leo.Div. 

a c~~. i.eai 

;11reot.or 

t,f!51.C-3a 

• REF ID:A362877 • 

Friodr.ian and. Mauborgm ... Invention 

• 

1. Inclo•od is a letter and ita inoloauro• 

&ddroosed to !.tr. Friodnan. 

2. It is oontra.ry to :Jolio;y oi" Local ~>ireotor 

to file patent &pplioationa on aeorot invontion8. 

They a.ru l'ilod on invontion& oonaidired r.con!'idontial'! 

Aclvico is requeatud whether or not this oasc should 

bfJ filed.-

3. lf ~ou deoiJe tho casu should not be filoJ. 

it i5 re·-~-.;t.;ttod that sarao bo ai;:nod at the prooent 

ti.'IlB • antl thia cf'fioe notified. Thia o!'i'ice uill 

then prepare a lottor £or the i"il• of the caso, 

sht'Wing tho facts 10 in a:r:.y future interferouoe 

pri~rit;/ contest our rt:cord will be oloar. 

Incl -

l.etter to Frie<lnau a:id its enoloau.ros 

1. It 1• rooor.t·end41d that ti. eubjeat 

?&ttmt &pplioation bo filed undo~ the oon!'idont.i.al 

olaaalfioat.1 on. 

I. ~ duplicate QOW ot the &ppllo&t1on hM 

'btt4in retainl<l by -.. r. :·r10~. 

s. 11'.> ohn.n;e.::. 1.1.1"(1 •uttelted l'Ola~ift tc tho 

applloatt.cn. 

:1elaon !.\oore 

Capt., Sit:;.C. 

A ttornoy II nrt. 

J..or;o.l Director 

~:mtc-3& D.xt. 

72410 Feb.2,1943 

"ii .Preston Corderma. 

Colonel~ Sig.Cor 

SPSIS-7 -

Gode 0129
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Bradley D. Slye, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August 14, 2007
        /s/ Bradley D. SlyeBradley D. SlyeChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer








---