alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7149

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLSHAWN JONES,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (7:02-cr-00244-HMH-13)

Submitted: October 27, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2009

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willshawn Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Jean Howard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Willshawn Jones appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have

reviewed the record and find that the § 3582(c) motion was
properly denied because Jones is ineligible for a sentence

reduction. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1 cmt.
n.10(D)(ii)(II) (2008). Accordingly, we find no reversible

error and affirm the district court’s order. United States v.

Jones , No. 7:02-cr-00244-HMH-13 (D.S.C. June 6, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
98-1.

#### Specht v. BP Am., Inc.

Cuyahoga App. No. 71899. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 29, 711 N.E.2d 225. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
March 26, 1999

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C.  20549

Re:  Export Funding Corporation
     Export Funding Trust, Series 1994-A
     7.89% Pass-Through Certificates, Class A
     (File No. 33-49560)

     Export Funding Corporation
     Export Funding Trust, Series 1995-A
     8.21% Pass-Through Certificates, Class A
     (File No. 33-49560)

Dear Sirs:

The  Export Funding Corporation,  on behalf of the Export Funding Trust,  Series
1994-A, 1995-A,  is filing an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1998.

Kindly  acknowledge  receipt  and acceptance of  this  filing  by  returning  an
original confirmation submission to our attention.

Very truly yours,

/s/Michael T. Timoney
Michael T. Timoney
Vice President
121 West Trade Street, 21st Floor
Charlotte, North Carolina 28255
\. 

. ADDRESS ONL.Y 

THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS REF tl>:A363441. .I 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

• UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 

· December 5,. 1945 

Bx parte William F. Fried~an 

Seri al lfo. 551 172 

Piled August 25. 1944 

Authenticating Device 

In compliance wl th the req,ue,st in the 

letter ot the Acting Secretary of ~~r, dated 

August 29, 1945, thia application 1;a placed under the provisions ot U. s. Code,. Title 35, 

Sec·t1on 37• · 

The assignment accompanying ;'.aa1d letter,. 

conveying to the Government of th• Un1t•d Sta.tea 

or America the entire right, title )and interest 

in and to the above noted appl1cat1.on, bae been 

recorded in accordance with the Oomm1a•1oner'• 

Order Ko. ,250, or September 5,, 1933, f'or recording aaa1gnme~ta of app11cat1ona that are to be preae~ved in secrecy, and the aaa1gi'lment la ~eturned aa requested to Colonel Francia H. 

Vand.erwerker. Office of the Judg• A;d.voc•te General • . War Departm.ent. Waah1ngton, D. c. -

1'h1a application will not beoome abandoned 

prior to th• expiration or three ye_:ara :t'l"om the 

~ate or tha last OU!o/Y)t_1o?;.) 1 

. . 

~v.:' · ll'irat Aa~DllliaaioMr 

William D. ijall c/o Chie.t' Signal Ott!oer 

Pentagon Bldg. Washington. u. O. 

. . . 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Amendment No. 1 to Warrant



 EXHIBIT 10.25.7.1 

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO WARRANT 
 This Amendment No. 1 to Warrant (“Amendment”), is made, delivered, and effective as of the Effective Date by and between NEXX SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation
(“Borrower”) and COMERICA BANK, a Texas banking association (“Comerica”) in order to amend the Warrant to Purchase Stock dated June 10, 2011 issued by Borrower to Comerica Bank
(“Warrant”). 
 For valuable consideration, Borrower and Comerica agree as follows: 

1. Section 2.4 of the Warrant is amended entirely to read as set forth below: 

“2.4 Intentionally deleted.” 
 2. This Amendment is not an agreement to any further or other amendment of the Warrant. Borrower and Comerica expressly acknowledge and agree that except as expressly amended in this Amendment, the
Warrant, as amended, remains in full force and effect and is ratified and confirmed. 
 This Amendment No. 1 to Warrant is executed and
delivered as of the date first written above. 
  

									
	NEXX SYSTEMS, INC.	 	 	 	COMERICA BANK
					
	By:	 	 /S/ STANLEY D. PIEKOS
	 	 	 	By:	 	 /S/ LAREEDA RENTIE

	Name:	 	Stanley D. Piekos	 	 	 	Name:	 	LaReeda Rentie
	Title:	 	Chief Financial Officer	 	 	 	Title:	 	First Level Officer
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2196 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for the nonapplication of Medicare competitive acquisition rates to complex rehabilitative wheelchairs and accessories. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 22, 2015 

Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. PORTMAN, Mr. SCHUMER, and Mr. COCHRAN) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

for the non-application of Medicare competitive acquisition rates to complex rehabilitative wheelchairs and accessories. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLARIFYING NON-APPLICATION OF MEDICARE 

4 COMPETITIVE ACQUISITION RATES TO COM5 PLEX REHABILITATIVE WHEELCHAIRS AND 

6 ACCESSORIES. 

7 Section 1834(a)(1)(F) of the Social Security Act (42 

8 U.S.C. 1395m(a)(1)(F)) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2196 IS

1 (1) in clause (ii), by striking at the end ‘‘and’’; 

2 (2) in clause (iii), by striking at the end the pe3 riod and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

4 (3) by adding at the end the following new 

5 clause: 

6 ‘‘(iv) in the case of covered items fur7 nished on or after January 1, 2016, the 

8 Secretary shall not apply this subpara9 graph or any other provision of this title to 

10 use information from the competitive ac11 quisition program to determine payment 

12 amounts for items excluded from such 

13 competitive acquisition program, including 

14 all complex rehabilitative manual and 

15 power wheelchairs classified by the Sec16 retary as of January 1, 2015, and, without 

17 limitation, any wheelchair accessory, cush18 ion, or back when furnished in connection 

19 with a complex rehabilitative manual or 

20 power wheelchair.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# CE2004078EN.01032404.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/324 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/324

---

(2004/C 78 E/0341)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3808/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on use of funding from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Macerata

Subject:

In its answer to question E-0982/03 (1), which asked whether the municipality of Macerata had submitted projects or secured funding under the Culture 2000 programme, the Commission stated, on 30 July has been the case subsequently and up to the present?

1

---

(1)  OJ C 242 E, 9.10.2003, p. 200.

1

---
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intermagnetics General Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ending February 26, 2006, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Glenn H. Epstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Glenn H. Epstein*
------------------------------------
Glenn H. Epstein
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
April 7, 2006


* These certifications are being furnished as required by Rule 13a-14(b) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code, and shall not be deemed
"filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to
the liability of that Section. These certifications shall not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or
the Exchange Act, except as otherwise stated in such filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1


                      CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-09161 and 333-11869) of Workgroup Technology
Corporation of our report dated April 23, 1999 relating to the financial
statements, which appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
June 29,1999
<PAGE>



                              October 28, 1997




Mr. Edward B. Jobe
32 Vreeland Court
Princeton, New Jersey  08540

Dear Ed:

     This letter will confirm the terms on which you have agreed to continue to
provide consulting services to American Re Corporation or a successor
organization.

     For the period from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998 you agree to
provide various consulting services, from time to time, under my direction and
as I may request.  We have agreed that these services may involve up to 50% of
your work-time over the course of the year.

     As consideration for these services, American Re will pay you an annual fee
of $250,000 payable in equal monthly installations of $20,833.33 on the last day
of each month.  Other reasonable expenses related to American Re's business, if
approved in advance, will also be reimbursed.

     American Re agrees to indemnify and hold you harmless against any and all
claims, damages, costs, expenses and suits related to your performance of
services for American Re, except those arising out of your intentional
misconduct or gross negligence.

     You may terminate this agreement at any time upon 90 days written notice to
American Re.  American Re may terminate this agreement only in the event of
fraud, intentional misconduct, gross negligence, or your inability to perform
due to death or disability.

     If these terms are acceptable, please sign the agreement in the space
provided below and return it to my attention.

     As you know, I am pleased that I can continue my association with you both
personally and professionally.

                              Sincerely,



                              Edward J. Noonan


Accepted and Agreed:________________________________,Dated:____________________
                       Edward B. Jobe
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        14,814,452
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                      24,012
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                   66,458
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              17,747,921
<CASH>                                       3,772,772
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           5,166,702
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         250,370
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              31,850,144
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             17,324,943
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          6,041,606
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     3,002,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,427,866
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                31,850,144
<PREMIUMS>                                   5,125,644
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            825,866
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              48,783
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   3,507,006
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,822,264
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                671,023
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,420
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            657,603
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   657,603
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1

VonDemHagen, Rebecca

From: Bruce Alan Karas <brkaras@coca-cola.com>

Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 10:41 AM

To: VonDemHagen, Rebecca

Cc: Newberg, Cindy; Godwin, Dave

Subject: Additional information regarding, Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0198

Attachments: Additional Coca-Cola Comments-EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0198.pdf

In response to your recent request, the attached letter provides additional information regarding the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) about changes to the listing status for certain substitutes

under the SNAP program.  Coca‐Cola believes the SNAP program is an effective vehicle to reduce f‐gas atmospheric

pollutants and address climate protection.  

The rulemaking proposes a singular transition date of January 1, 2016 to set HFC‐134a and other HFC refrigerant blends

as unacceptable for new stand‐alone retail food refrigeration and new vending machines because acceptable

alternatives exist [79 Federal Register 46126 (August 6, 2014), to amend 40 C.F.R. Part 82]. However, these acceptable

alternatives (R744, R717, R600a, R290, R441a) currently do not have essential system components commercially

available in all refrigerating capacities to establish efficient equipment for the full range of equipment sizes.   The chart

of Table 1 in the attached letter, differentiates when the various sizes are expected to be achieved and available for

commercial application. Understand that even when the appropriate components become commercially available, time

must still be allocated to develop the new refrigeration system for the appliance, test and optimize it, secure safety

certification, and make arrangements for production.   Coca‐Cola recommends that the EPA refine the timetable of the

NOPR to reflect what can be realistically achieved as expressed below in this table.  

Thank you for soliciting our input. Do not hesitate to request greater detail, if needed.

Regards,

Bruce Karas

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential, privileged and 

exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any printing, copying, 

dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the 

sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.
2
IN REPLY 

REFER TO 

REF ID:A105020 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

LME·D 

MEMORANDUll R>R THE PKRSONNEL DIVISION, 

Training Beotion. 

July 18, 1924. 

1. Re your memorandum of Jime 6, 1924, you are advised tli...s.t upon 

investigation it has been found that the use of positive and negative polarity in 

modification of the i'eletype apparatus for cryptographic purposes would somewhat 

complicate the equipment and would nake it neceesary to redesign the transmitter 

contact device. It is believed to be impracticable to install additional contacts 

on this rotating device in order to give OpPOSite polarity without endangering 

the chance of short circuit. 

2. The printer magnet is also rather heavy, and i£ the time element 

were shortened as would be required if the two polarities were used, it would 

probably be necessary to reduce the speed in order to give the necessary time £or 

its proper operation. 

3. A.:f'l;er a careful study of the equipment it has been found that 

proper results can be obtained with one polarity provided the printer magnet 

is differentially wound. This will require no change in the present rotating 

contact device of the Teletype transmitter and the printer nagnet is so constructed that it can be connected as a differential nagnet. It is, therefore, 

only necessary to reconnect this nagnet and install in connection with the present Teletype transmitter a sychronized contact device through which one or more 

Western Electric tape transmitters nay be added to thi.s equipment. The resultant 0£ the Teletype transmitter and tape transmitter will be transmtted over the 

line and can be deciphered at the other end by a similar arrangement.. 

4. A description of the proposed method is attached. Work is n.aW 

under way to add the additional equipment to modify the Teletype set along these 

lines. 

N. F. McClure,'· 

Colonel, )!:~igna.l Corps. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-12-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
**Exhibit
      13.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Trinity Biotech plc (the “Company”) on Form
      20-F for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rory Nealon, Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








RORY
      NEALON*


Rory
      Nealon


Chief
      Financial Officer





May
      8,
      2007




*  The
      originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the
      Company’s offices and will be made available for inspection upon
      request.


130
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Equidyne Corporation (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffery
B. Weinress, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that based on my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Date: December 12, 2002
                                                     By: /s/ Jeffery B. Weinress
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Jeffery B. Weinress
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-10288

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DARIN LEE MUIR,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:18-CR-216-1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Darin Lee Muir has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Muir has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 7, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-10288 Document: 00515190744 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/07/2019
No. 19-10288

2

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-10288 Document: 00515190744 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/07/2019