alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 48 (Thursday, March 12, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13012-13013]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05576]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces a meeting for the initial review of 
applications in response to (FOA) DP15-009, Improving Surveillance and 
Prevention of Epilepsy Burden in U.S. Communities.

    Time and Date: 10:00 a.m.--6:00 p.m., March 31, 2015 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters for Discussion: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of applications received in 
response to ``Improving Surveillance and Prevention of Epilepsy 
Burden in US Communities'', DP15-009.
    Contact Person for More Information: M. Chris Langub, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop 
F-80, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3585, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7e3b3b31483e1d1a1d50191108"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc898983fa8cafa8afe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and

[[Page 13013]]

Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.


Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2015-05576 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Eddie Smith, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 545]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Stone, J.), rendered July 16, 2001, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 572 to 11 years, unanimously affirmed.

Giving deference to the trial court’s ability to observe de*292meaner, we conclude that the court properly granted the People’s challenge for cause to a prospective juror *(see People v Williams,*63 NY2d 882, 885 [1984]). Viewed as a whole, the panelist’s responses established that he was too biased against the police to serve as an impartial juror in a case turning on police credibility *(see People v Shtilman,*278 AD2d 5 [2000], *lv denied*96 NY2d 787 [2001]).

The court properly admitted evidence of an uncharged drug transaction that occurred immediately after the charged sale. This testimony tended to complete the narrative, and it was relevant to the contested issues of identity and acting in concert *(see e.g. People v Garcia,*276 AD2d 270 [2000], *lv denied*95 NY2d 963 [2000]). Furthermore, the evidence was rehable, and the limiting instructions included in the court’s final charge prevented any prejudice.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

We have considered and rejected defendant’s remaining claims. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Nardelli, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
#### The State ex rel. Ruffin, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Ruffin v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 385.]

(No. 98-2063

Submitted June 22, 1999

Decided September 8, 1999.)

*Clements, Mahin & Cohen, L.L.P.,*and *Lane N. Cohen,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Steven P. Fixler,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellees Industrial Commission and Administrator, Bureau of Workers’ Compensation.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2003-1427, 2008-1378, -1400 ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, and DAVID FINK, TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON, And FINK & JOHNSON,

Sanctioned Parties-Appellants,

v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in case no. 02-CV-60478, Judge Adalberto Jordan.

ON MOTION Before MOORE, Circuit Judge. ORDER We construe Alexander Orenshteyn's February 25, 2009 letter as a motion to direct Citrix Systems, Inc. to file a corrected brief. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: The motion is denied.FOR THE COURT



# MAR 2 0 2009 Date

cc: Alexander S. Orenshteyn Douglas J. Kline, Esq. David Fink, Esq. s19 /s/ Jan Horbalv Jan Horbaly FILED Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT MAR 2 0 2009 itth CixtK

2003-1427, 2008-1378, -1400 2
POL-26 

(8-57) 

ADDRESS ONLY RElAP:A363064 

~ All commun{caUons respecling this applJcotion should give the· 

serial number, date of filing, and name of the applicant. 

THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

PATENT OFFICE 

WASHINGTON 

NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE 

The application for patent identified below has been examined and found allowable for issuance 

of Letters Patent. 

~ NO. CLJl..IMS ALLOWED 

.,I EXAMINER 

APPLICANT .• 

f-----+-------~,------=-=--c..-··,,.._~-·---------1M'Alt:EJJ ~c .. 19.,_.· 19'8 

ASSIGNEE -------- TITLE OF INVENTION 

D The final fee for this application has been received. The patent will be issued 

and forwarded in approximately two months from date. 

~ This application for patent was filed under the provisions of 35 U. S. C. 266 and 

· will accordingly issue without payment of final fee. 

D Since the entire interest in this invention has been assigned to the United States 

Government, the patent will issue without payment of final fee in accordan~_ 

with the provisions of Comptroller General's Decision B-111, 648 of July 13, 1953. 

iJ The patent will be issued and forwarded in about 90 days from date unless earlier 

issuance, not less than two months from date, is requested by applicant. 

D This application is for reissue of patent number .. ______ _ 

REISSUE FILING DATE NO. REISSUE CLAIMS ALLOWED REISSUE DATE 

The patent will be reissued a-nd forwarded on the date. indicated above:------

By Direction of the Commissioner . . 

L _J 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\f
-/ 

l 

' 

REF ID:A65548 

DJ". 

~ 

8. s . lff.lka 

of Mathematica ._ 708, Fim lt&U 

Princeton Ua.1.venity 

hiJiceton, hv Jeney 

l1ear ... 

llerialt : ~ g 0 r:g 

eo;rno~ 

t'bie ta to ae~ JOUt' letter ot 20 April 1954 

tn rea;ud to the Paml activities or f.0-21 MillT· 

Your undentanding ot the progru ro:r 20 ..,. u 

~ 

accurate, and. I 4o JXJt think it ~eanr., fOJ' 10\1 to be 

QC. that dlr¥. 

Dr. 0.Jl(>eigne u vorld.ng on a proera.m tar the activitie• 

et the 2let. The program u apected to begin at 9t00 •·•· 

I .. incloaing eop1ea ot 10\Jl" travel order• d • txii.ns· 

JOl"tation raqueat in ~ion vitb )'out 21 M9¥ •ieit. 

lr.1-o htcloeed far ;vour conveuieuce 18 an 1nrttu.ction 

#hMt with the Nquired fOl"Ill8 ao tbia.t you~ receive eom- ~t1on for arq ~ incurred u protptly aa JOl91ble. 

cc: 

I.ookiag ~to seeblg you, I M 1 

8iDcerel.y J 

'WlLLVM F. 1'1U£IJ!Aff 

Jneutive Secretary 

mA Sc~titic Mviaor.r :Boo.rd 

NJ 

c/s 

8/N3ST (Mr. Friednnn) 

M/R: Acknowledges Dr. Wilks• acceptance ot 21 ... 21 May Panel Meetings. 

Notes t~ of arrival, encloses all necessary :forms and orders 

tar subject meeting. 

Lt. I. T. McDona.1d/6o493/4~ys4 I can --r-ov_e_d.,....,f,....or-=-e...,.le_s_e..,...b__,...N,..,,....,.A-o-n""""'o"""'7,...,_ 2""""3,...._ 2"""'0,....,1 ..... 4-u-rs ..... u-nt-t--=E....,. 0,,...._ ..... 1...,,.3=52~ - - -- -- - -
Commodity 2006 Pounds Applied 2007 Pounds Applied 2008 Pounds Applied

BROCCOLI 1.99
CAULIFLOWER 10.61
CUCUMBER (PICKLING, CHINESE, ETC.) 59.28
ENDIVE (ESCAROLE) 3.19
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE 253.33
LEAFY VEGETABLES (ALL OR UNSPEC) 56.25 LETTUCE, HEAD (ALL OR UNSPEC) 71222.83 59158.76 LETTUCE, LEAF (ALL OR UNSPEC) 77.80 64777.33 54504.79 MUSTARD, GENERAL 9.97
N

‐ GRNHS GRWN TRNSPLNT/PRPGTV MTRL 0.02 33.23 34.99
N

‐ OUTDR GRWN CUT FLWRS OR GREENS 1.99
N

‐ OUTDR GRWN TRNSPLNT/PRPGTV MTRL 10.96 4.15
ORNAMENTAL TURF (ALL OR UNSPEC) 15.00
PEPPERS (FRUITING VEGETABLE), (BELL,CHILI, ETC.) 10.77 821.26 1018.60
SPINACH 9.97 1.52 SQUASH (SUMMER) 1.99
TOMATILLO 63.05
TOMATO 252.20 772.71 800.31 TOMATOES, FOR PROCESSING/CANNING 415.97 388.05
VERTEBRATE PEST CONTROL 2.03
WATERMELONS 340.33 403.53 Grand Total 340.79 138527.88 116670.09 Date Prepared: November 24, 2010 Cal DPR Data: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/purmain.htm Empty cells indicate no available usage. 

### Propamocarb HCl(119302) Cal. DPR Usage Data

Publicly available data from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CADPR) was used to produce the following table outlining the pounds of Limonene used in California over the three most recent years available (2005 ‐ 2008).
^^7z^ ^^EDSTA^^^

^

rAı p,^orES

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

The Honorable Gary R. Herbert 

Governor of Utah 

P.O. Box 142220 

Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-2200 

1)ear Governor Herbert: 

Thank you for your letter of June 20, 2013, expressing your support of the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency's proposed Tier 3 regulations for motor vehicle emissions and gasoline standards. 

At the outset, having just been confirmed by the U.S. Senate, let me say how much I am looking forward 

to working with you and all of your gubernatorial colleagues across the country. I have worked with 

several governors throughout my career and truly appreciate the vast responsibilities they have and what 

a tremendous job they do carrying them out. 

I appreciate the information you shared regarding the need for a Tier 3 program and its potential for 

reducing harmful air pollutants in Utah. The health and air quality benefits of the proposed Tier 3 

program are too important to delay, and the EPA is working to finalize these standards by the end of this 

year. Over 158 million Americans are currently experiencing unhealthy levels of air pollution which are 

linked to adverse health impacts such as hospital admissions, emergency room visits and premature 

mortality. By reducing motor vehicle emissions, the proposed Tier 3 standards would lead to immediate 

air quality improvements that are critically important for states to attain and maintain the existing healthbased National Ambient Air Quality Standards and realize substantial health benefits. 

The EPA understands the importance of potential cost impacts on refineries, automakers, and 

consumers. As mentioned in your letter, we have included flexibility provisions in the proposed Tier 3 

program designed to help refiners and refineries transition to the lower sulfur standards. These 

flexibilities have proven successful in past fuel programs and include an averaging, banking, and trading 

program, relief for small refiners and refineries, and economic and technical hardship provisions. We 

included a refinery-by-refinery analysis of the costs associated with lowering sulfur in gasoline as part 

of the extensive cost analyses we conducted for the proposed Tier 3 standards. We estimate the proposed 

Tier 3 program would yield health benefits between $8 and $23 billion annually by 2030 for a cost of 

about a penny per gallon of gasoline and about $130 per vehicle. 

Internet Address (URL) • http//wwwepa gov 


Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer, Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
We recognize the specific points you raised and have submitted your letter to the public docket so that 

we may also address your comments as part of the final rule. 

Again, thank you for your letter. If you have further questions or concerns, please contact me or your 

staff may call Mark Rupp, the EPA's Deputy Associate Administrator for Intergovernmental Relations, 

at (202) 564-7178.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-28-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-28-1996
<CASH>                                         3532600
<SECURITIES>                                  23680800
<RECEIVABLES>                                 12522900
<ALLOWANCES>                                    563400
<INVENTORY>                                   15194900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              54710900
<PP&E>                                        19601700
<DEPRECIATION>                                14609600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                66089300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5683900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                      34678400
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  66089300
<SALES>                                       20850700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              20850700
<CGS>                                         13382900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 13382900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5873000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1594800
<INCOME-TAX>                                    510400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1084400
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1084400
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of
ACT Manufacturing, Inc. of our report dated August 21, 1998, except as to Note
14, which is as of October 9, 1998, relating to the financial statements of CMC
Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which appear in such Registration
Statement. We also consent to the references to us under the headings "Experts"
in such Registration Statement.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Memphis, Tennessee
June 21, 1999
[4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 (Docket No. FAA-2010-055~h.Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-124-AD; Amendme 

# \(045tf JO-l-, 39-*****j AD 2010-**-**} RlN 212ll-AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100&440) Airplanes; Model CL-600-2CIO (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702) Airplanes; Model CL-600-2DI5 (Regional Jet Series 705) Airplanes; and Model CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department ofTransportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule. ~C\lRIlt~CI:S (}IJIINGSV"OOl

n 

# "1/'" 10



### NITIA'-''''''' SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airworthiness directive (AD) forthe products list n: above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infomlation (MeAl) origmated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct anunsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAl describes the unsafe condition as:
Two cases ofa crack on a "dry" ADG [air driven generator] (Hamilton Sundstrand part number in the 761339 series), in the aft area ofthe stmt and generator housing assembly, have been reported on CL-600-2B19 aircraft. The same part is also installed on CL-600-2C I0, -2D15and -2D24 aircraft. Investigation determined that tbe crack was inan area of the stmt where the wall thickness ofthe casting was below specification, due to amanufacturing anomaly inaspecific batch ofADOs. Structural failure and departure ofthe ADO during deployment could possibly result indamage to the aircraft structure. Ifdeployment was activated by adual engine shutdown, ADO structural failure would also result inloss of ROlITrNGsn.,nOl

NlTlAL.sISI(;

OA1E i 

# i ROlITlNG sYMIIOl.

I'NlT'AI..S'SiG I

# I"n I 1l'G5Y"'llOl 

## I~."",",~",",,,---
• REF ID:A66442 

UNITED ST ATES AIR FORCE 

AIR UNIVERSITY 

HEADQUARTERS 

AIR COMMAND AND STAFF SCHOOL 

MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA 

ro: Dir..tar 

N&Uonal ~ \J" A£CIU\Y ••'DI\• is. o. c. 

1. We villh tct _,..... our .,,...,..ti• tw -.Jd.81 it ponilal• 

l• •· WS.111• r. hMMIMa to Wk to RI' Cr e mSoat.1..,..AlaaV.alos 

aatt ot&u Cour• • •ccmaioaU.ou xawuc .... " •· M..._, 

u uul.• gave a.,_, ia'9•ee\1aa 8114 We11M\£n talk, 81111 Id.a pn- ••'-~ion con.\l"J.ln&W gnat.q to tbl• cow• et ~ 

I. Pleaae .,. ... .,.. pt&tit.wltt \o •· ll':letllllm t• bl• 'Mae 

..i ettort. renea-.. in Mld.n.g tl).1a Jl'4'8.na\18L V. nal.iae ~ 

lt 1• not alwiq• ilUJ" tor tda t.o 1.-..,... a N7 •...a.l.• u be td.tll 

u. 

i.iUJUill Cl• HOOD 1 .Ja. 

11'11.Uer 1-ftl,, UiW" 

tr r••• 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12244]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05320]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[License No. 07/07-0118]


Notice Seeking Exemption under Section 312 of the Small Business 
Investment Act, Conflicts of Interest, C3 Capital Partners III, L.P.

    Notice is hereby given that C3 Capital Partners III, L.P., 1511 
Baltimore Ave., Suite 500, Kansas, MO 64108, a Federal Licensee under 
the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (the ``Act''), in 
connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an 
exemption under Section 312 of the Act and 13 CFR 107.730, Financings 
which Constitute Conflicts of Interest, of the Small Business 
Administration (``SBA'') Rules and Regulations. C3 Capital Partners 
III, L.P., provided a loan to Green Compass f/k/a Santa Clara Waste 
Water Company and California Living Waters, Inc. (``Green Compass''), 
2775 North Ventura Road, Suite 209, Oxnard, CA 93036. The financing was 
contemplated to provide capital that contributes to the growth and 
overall sound financing of Green Compass.
    The financing is brought within the purview of Sec.  107.730(a)(1) 
because C3 Capital Partners II, L.P., an Associate of C3 Capital 
Partners III, L.P., as defined in Sec.  107.50, owns a ten percent or 
greater equity interest in Green Compass. Accordingly, Green Compass is 
considered an Associate of C3 Capital Partners III, L.P.
    Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit 
written comments on the transaction to the Associate Administrator, 
Office of Investment and Innovation, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, 409 Third Street SW., Washington, DC 20416.

    Dated: February 25, 2015.
Javier E. Saade,
Associate Administrator, Office of Investment and Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2015-05320 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,828
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                       374
<INVENTORY>                                     31,015
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,772
<PP&E>                                          61,404
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,505
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,306
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,282
<BONDS>                                         28,780
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      6,999
<COMMON>                                         1,344
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   128,306
<SALES>                                         26,494
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,866
<CGS>                                           16,713
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,713
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,894
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                       727
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,005
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,005
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
        

</TABLE>
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00136-CR

STEVEN SEARLS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 16th District 

Court

of Denton County (F17-3268-16)

August 27, 2019

Opinion by Justice Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for want of 

jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel