alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## 2002 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

2-15-2002 

# U S A v . P a n a r el l a
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ock e t 1-1739

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2002

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. I t h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2002 D e c i sion s b y a n a uthor i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no v a U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al R e posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min

. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du

. 

## R e c omme nde d C it a t ion

" U SA v . P a n a r e l l a " (2002). 2002 D e cisio n s . P ape r 125. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2002/125

### Filed February 15, 2002

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 01-1739
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v. NICHOLAS PANARELLA, JR., Appellant (D.C. Crim. No. 00-cr-00655) Present: BECKER, Chief Judge, AMBRO, and WEIS, Circuit Judges. (Opinion Filed: January 11, 2002)
ORDER AMENDING OPINION The slip opinion in the above case filed January 11 , 2002, is amended as follows: 1. On page 8, line 11, the word "business" s hould be changed to "businesses." 2. On page 12, first full paragraph, line 7, add the word "the" before "defendant." 3. On page 17, first full paragraph, line 5, change the referenced Section to S 2255. 4. On page 23, first full paragraph, line 11 , add the word "infra" after the word See . 5. On page 34, footnote 9, third line from t he bottom, the first word should be "financial."

### BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward R. Becker Chief Judge DATE: February 15, 2002 A True Copy: Teste: Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID GETZEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

JUAN GARCIA ROMERO, Detention 

Officer, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 20-17241 

D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08066-SRB-DMF 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges. 

David Getzen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Erlin v. United States, 

364 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on the basis of the statute of 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

SEP 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 20-17241 

limitations); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) (dismissal under 

28 U.S.C. § 1915A). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Getzen’s action because it is barred by 

the applicable two-year statute of limitations. See Jones v. Blanas, 393 F.3d 918, 

927 (9th Cir. 2004) (§ 1983 claims are governed by the forum state’s statute of 

limitations for personal injury claims); TwoRivers v. Lewis, 174 F.3d 987, 991-92

(9th Cir. 1999) (the statute of limitations for § 1983 claims in Arizona is two 

years).

Getzen’s motion for default (Docket Entry No. 15) and motion to 

consolidate (Docket Entry No. 16) are denied.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-7099

ALVIN LAWRENCE JARRETT, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-734-2) Submitted: October 15, 2004 Decided: November 8, 2004 Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Alvin Lawrence Jarrett, Appellant Pro Se. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Alvin Lawrence Jarrett seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a subst antial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Jarrett has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Amendment No. 1 to Consulting Agreement



 Exhibit 10.1 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT 
 This Amendment No. 1 to the Consulting
Agreement between Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Jacobs”) and Noel G. Watson (“Mr. Watson”) dated July 1, 2010 is made effective July 1, 2011. 
 WHEREAS, the Consulting Agreement provides for a term of one (1) year and is renewable for additional periods by mutual agreement of the parties; and 

WHEREAS, Mr. Watson and Jacobs have agreed to renew the Consulting Agreement for an additional two year period to June 30, 2013.

 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the valuable promises and the agreements contained herein, it is agreed as follows: 

 

	 	1.	The Consulting Agreement shall be extended through June 30, 2013. 

  

	 	2.	All other terms and conditions of the Consulting Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the day and year first above written. 

 

									
	NOEL G. WATSON	 		  	JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC.

					
	 /s/ Noel G. Watson
	 		  		  	By:	 	 /s/ Craig L. Martin

		 		  		  	Craig L. Martin, President & CEO
Order filed November 1, 2011.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-11-00630-CR

____________

MERCEDEZ LESHION JONES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1280521

O R D E R

The reporter=s record in this case was due August 22, 2011. See Tex. R. App. P.

35.2. On September 8, 2011, Marcia Barnett filed a motion for extension of time to file 

the record. 

The court granted an extension for the record until October 20, 2011. The record 

has not been filed with the court. 

We order Marcia Barnett, the court reporter, to file her portion of the record in this 

appeal on or before November 21, 2011.

PER CURIAM
2
ADDRESS ONLY 

THE co!tMISSIONER OF PATENTS • REF 'D: A36312 7 ti 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

R:CHMOND, VIRGINIA 

Ex parte William F. Friedman 

Serial No. 549,086 

?!led August 11, 1944 

Electrical Syatem 

Dece~ber 5, 1945 

In compliance with the request in tho 

letter of the Actine Secretary ot War, dated 

Aueust 29, 1945, this application :ts placed under 

the provisions of u. s. Code, Title ;5, Section 

;7. 

The assignment accompanying said letter, 

conveying to the Government of the United Ztates 

ot America the entire right, titl& and interest 

in and to the above noted at~lication, has been 

recorded in accordance with the Commissioner's 

Order No. ;250, ot September 5, 1933, tor record~ 

ing assirnments ot applications that are to be 

preserved in secrecy, and the assignment is 

returned as requested to Colonel Francis H. 

yanderwerker, Of~ice of the Judge Advocate General, 

War Department, Washington, D. c. 

This application will not become abandoned 

prior to the expiretion of three years from the 

date of the last Office /jl~7.on,~ . 

, . First ~;~ Assi.,.!t"2'7 o_miesioner 

William D. Hall 

e/o Chie! Signal Officer 

Pentagon Bldg. Washington, D. c. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 08-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
<PAGE>

                                                                 Exhibit 99.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of President Casinos, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Ralph J. Vaclavik, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.


Date: May 28, 2003              /s/ Ralph J. Vaclavik
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                     Ralph J. Vaclavik
                                     Chief Financial Officer of
                                     President Casinos, Inc.
EXHIBIT 10.4
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AMPAC FINE CHEMICALS LLC PENSION PLAN
FOR BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES
   EMPLOYEE UNIT:
    
    Ampac Fine Chemicals LLC
Sacramento, California
International Association of Machinists &
Aerospace Workers, Local #946
  Date of Last Employmentin Employee Unit
    
    Benefit FactorOn or after December 1, 2005
    
    $
    53.00And before June 15, 2007On or after June 15, 2007
    
    $
    58.00And before June 15, 2011On or after June 15, 2011
    
    $
    61.00And before June 15, 2012On or after June 15, 2012
    
    $
    63.00
 15th July 2010
 American Pacific CorporationATTEST: (SEAL)
    
    By:
    
    /s/ JOSEPH CARLEONE
 1
.l.!r. William A. Friedman 

NatiOJUil. Securit7 Agency 

Washington 251 D. C. 

Dear Sir: 

REF ID:A72894 

2 November 1954 

I wish to express m:y sincere a~preciation for the very kiln com:nents 

you recantl,y made in coDnection with the Code and Cipher chapter ot uq 

draft MID History covering the peacetime years (1919-1941). They are already proving to be most helpfa.il in my '3urrent final revision task. Mq 

I aak 7our further indulgence in order to clear up another point? 

The following statement was contained in General Mauborgne's letter ot 

conmenta 

n1 suggest that one or more paragraphs be inserted in the present text 

to cover the :tact that I persuaded Secretary Stimson to let the .Ari:i,y seDd 

one o:t the Ar1l\7-designed Japanese diplomatic code-breaking machines to the 

Britiah High Commal'Jd in .L:>r.don together with ~artaL"'l experts to demonstrate 

the use thereof', since we reared that the NaV7 was about to send over one 

of' these machines and steal Army thUilder. r::-. I'riadman can g.ve the entire 

story and state just what we got from the British in return - a most impo~WlDt swap worth recording on the pages of history." 

I agree with General iiauborg:ne that this exchange should be mentioned 

' and hope that you may see f'it to fill out the gap t""or me, including the 

tiI:le element. 

Incid"ntl71 :.Ir. Fabyan did publish two books in regard to his Bacon 

decipherr.:ient ettort. They are presently- very difficult to locate but I 

secured both of them through the Department o-£ the J.rrq inter-librar7 loan 

serrlce. I oncy made tun note ot one ot them, however, as tollon1 

George Fabyan1 The Ken for Deciphering the Greatas1; Work of Sk 

Francis Bacon (Geneva, Ill. 1916). 

Sincerely' yours 

BRUCE W. BIDWELL 

ColoIJel U.S.A. Ret. 

i 

I 

I 

I 

I 

- - Ji.< 

J 

----- _J 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 05-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

--~-
-

REF ID:A64981 

Encyclopaedia Britannica 

425 1forth Michigan Avenue 

Chicago 11, Illinois 

:oe~ Mt-. Yu.etc 

310 Second St~eet, S.E. 

Wa.&hiPgton 3, D. C. 

2 JuJ¥ 19.54 

lleceipt of your letter ot 29 June 1954 is 

acknowledged. 

l'. alJI. glad to accept the assignment to revise 

'lfi¥" article Qn COm-.s & Cll'HmS and request that you 

aend me a paste-up ot the present article tor use 

in connection with the revision. 

Sincerely, 

l!\pproved for Release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-

\ 

I 

\ r, 

\ 

I 

\ 

l 

\ 

• t 

\ 

t
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-74247A; File No. SR-BATS-2015-09]

# AGENCY:

Securities and Exchange Commission 

# ACTION:

 Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         on February 18, 2015, concerning a Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change to Amend Rules 11.9, 11.12, and 11.13 of BATS Exchange, Inc.. The document contained a typographical error.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher P. Grobbel, Division of Trading and Markets, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, (202) 551-5491.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of February 18, 2015 in FR Doc. 2015-3222, on page 8720, in the first and second line in the subheading under the heading “SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION” in the third column, correct the reference to “File No. SR-BATS-2014-09” instead to “File No. SR-BATS-2015-09.”                    

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-04423 Filed 3-3-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 Certification
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 I, Christopher G. Chavez, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced
Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and 5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Date: May 10, 2004 /s/Christopher G. ChavezName: Christopher G. ChavezTitle: Chief Executive Officer
REF ID :·A69931 

Mr~ Edmund iii. Slo11an 

1426 Buhl Building 

Detroit 26, Michigan 

M7 dear Mr •. Sloman: 

-

424 North George Uason Drive 

Arlington, Virginia 

l June 19.50 

In my letter of 28 April l95Q I indicated that I would.reply in 

greater detail as· soon as possible to~your letter of 3 .April 1950. 

A couple of' years ago -Uiss Pauline H~ltles or Watertown, Mass., 

wrote to rue a:id we exchanged soae letters on the subject of Dr. Owen's 

"word· cipher." I fea.r that I was not very helpful; becauae I have no 

confidence in the validity· of Lr. Owen's method and, as a consequence, 

io the validity of any results which might be obtained from the ap- · plication of the method. I am afraid that Miss Holmes r efforts during the past three years t~ work out exact. rules are doomed to 

disappointment beoattse, in my opinion, .Dr. Owen's n#ord c1p!ler11 is 

purely subjective in character. 

You imply that I have studied the Owen system intensively while 

I waa at Rivsrbank. This is far from the fact because I paid little 

or no attention-to it. If lam not mistaken, Mra. Gallup had herself 

lost faith in the "word cipher, 11 £or I rarely ewaT heard her even 

mention it. · 

You state that ~iss Holmes is convinced that Dr. Owen was substantially handicapped by the f aot that he did not know of the 

existence of three additional "guidewords." It- $eema to me that the 

multiplicity of "guidewords" that Dr. Owen already had aTailable or 

had elaborated is such that additional ones are hardly necessar.r. 

The number used by him 1$ suff ici&nt to enable one to compile "cipher 

messages" to one's heart's content., provided sufficient ingenuity and 

time are available. , 

I may, or course, be miata~•n in m7 opinion. I-note that you 

state t•We are both convinced that there are a number of plays, histories 

and poetic works written by Francia Bacon which are stiil buried in 

the cipher, _and which would constitute a substantial addition to 

English literature if they could be deciphered and preserved." l 

would be very glad to have TOU indicate the basis upon which your · conviction rests; and if it is sound enough to dissuade ne trom my 

present non-belief in the existence .of a cipher such as that 

postulated by Dr. Owen, I will be very glad to be of whatever assistance 

I can. . · - ., -, . · 

Very truly yours, 

iILLIAM F. FRIEPMAN 

roved for Release b NSA on 04-01-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 
r I 

I I . 

;.· 

• 

llr. Edmund 11. Sloman 

1426 Buhl Build1ug 

Detroit 26, Michigan 

. Dear Mr. Sloma~' 

6. July 1950~ 

'· '. 

This will be just a short. note.to.acknowledge . . . . . . ,. 

. receipt of yam: long letter of 30 June and to sq 

. . . . · that as a~onaa possibl.Q I will rep]¥ in greater 

detail. 

' . 

'' 

. 

. •' 

' 

. ' 

, . 

Very t~ yours, . 

·. 

, . 

'• . ,•, 

., 

• • I I 

· .... 

I :, \ • 

. ,. 

·.·· 

.· 

. : ... 

' ' 

..
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Trinity Biotech plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Ronan OCaoimh, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|                       
|/s/ RONAN OCAOIMH *   
|Ronan OCaoimh         
|Chief Executive Officer

April 6, 2012



|* | The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------