alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.5**
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC. SECTION 1350,
 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Calcitech Ltd Ltd (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the period ended February 29, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Geoffrey Long, the Chief Accountant of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 USC. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company
 
 Dated August 31, 2004

/s/ Geoffrey LongGeoffrey longChief Accountant 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH 

	NO. 2-09-194-CV

PATRICIA HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY 					        APPELLANT

AND AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE 

OF THE ESTATE OF HARVEY HARRIS, 

DECEASED		

	V.

ARLINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered “Appellant’s Agreed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL:  MCCOY, J.; CAYCE, C.J.; and LIVINGSTON, J. 

DELIVERED:  August 6, 2009
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7446

DAVID L. GUEST, Petitioner – Appellant,

v. GEORGE M. HINKLE, Warden, Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Gerald Bruce Lee, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00274-GBL-JFA)

Submitted: December 15, 2009 Decided: December 18, 2009

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David L. Guest, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

David L. Guest seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Guest has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
James Michael s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 16, 2014

No. 04-13-00803-CV

Denise MCVEA and Auris Project, Inc.,

Appellants

v.

James Michael KISSLER,

Appellee

From the 150th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-14927

Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Objection, Partial Motion for Reconsideration and Motion to Compel is 

DENIED.

_________________________________

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of May, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
REF ID: A6833. 

I 

Protes1o:tt W1. E. W1maatt 1 Jr .. 765 Jona.th~~ Edvard• Coll•g• Yale un1v?:J.Tlit7 

Nev Hav•XJ1 ,'·Cormeotiout 

I , I ' 

Dear Proteesor Wimsatt: 

I 

I hl.'9'e Juat returned. tt-oa an overseas Jd.aeion and 

hasten to repl7 to Jo\lll ~•tteit of April 24. '\ ' 

I t~ that it will.:bt quite aat1atacto17 to quote 

me a.s 7q\t have indicated tn 70U1' letter. I ' / \ 

Inaa~ch aa I a. no :longer on act! ve dut7, 1 t would 

proba);'ly:niot be quite accurate to petu 117 name with the 

title "C4lonel". Boveve~, I am 1t1l1 entitled to be adchteaee~ '1:Jat war in. n~a-otticial co~respon.denee or in 

sq.ci&l ~11at1ona, an4 Ji~u •7 do as fou please about addidg o:l',"droppihg the titl•. / Th• title ot the poa1t1on whioh I 

oocup7 n<W is e.1 1nd1o'ated beneath .., signature on thia 

letter a*d I preter tQ have ..,. ti.rat haao spelled out. 

I aa looking torward to seeing 7our paper 1.n print and 

I hop• rou vill be good enough to send me several r•printe. *'· B~igh&• vae nice enough to send .. seveJ'al copies ot hia ~per on Poe a.ad I am 1J1 the oourae of reading 1t 1n b1t1 

\ 

al a.tew •oaettt• attord u0v and then. All untortuna.t• tno• 'pap~cal.: •z.i-or 11 noted 1n the toot-not• on the ••17 t1rat 

p&gei .11\ which ., article / oa Aa•rican Li ter&il.Jlle is 1nc11cated ~· be~:ot ~e vintage ot 1836 iaateaC:i of §36. So tar aa 

I bav• gone, ~veve~, Brigbaa&•a pap•r 1• extremel1 int•r••'iJll· 

\ 

It J'OU are going to be ill Wa8hington th1• auuter do 

/ !drop i.-. to eee me. With beat 1'8g&1'4*, J:· f.11 

,' 

" ' I '\ .

... 

'Willl• F. FP1edman 

Direotor ot Comaunicationa 

Research 

pproved for Release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

13526 

\
~OP COPY 

21 sept 49 

Memo for Gen. Clarke: 

1. Herewith memo containing information for your own use in 

connection with AFCIAC meeting scheduled for 22 Sept re SISABA release. 

2. If this paper is going to be used officially, I think it ought 

to be signed by somebody else -- preferably yourself -- for the reason 

that my motives in preparing it might be subfect to question. 

3. If the paper is going to be circulated some revision might be 

in order -- a few simple changes. 

4. Wenger told me yesterday, during my visit at Naval Hospital 

that (1) he clearly remembers showing Tiltman the ECM in his own 

quarters in Navy Dept on Constitution Avenue; (2) he was directed 

to do so by Adm. Redman, orally via telephone; (3) he does not 

remember why the director ordered it be done or even if there was any 

explanation of the sudden change in policy; (4) he remembers that I 

was with them, had been given authority orally also to join in 

demonstration to Tiltman, and that we then went to Navy code center 

where TYPEX was shown to me. 

5. Further careful study of Inclosures 4 and 5 shows that Navy 

technicians (Safford & Smith) recommended disclosing ECM to British ~fter the CCM had been developed and approved as a plan for Combined 

communications but before mass production of the CCM was begun. They 

felt it was a question of saving ~ -- if ECM were released, the 

matter of Combined communications could be solved by early spring 

1943; but if ECM could not be released and production of CCM started, 

it would involve 12 to 18 months delay before COM system could be 

made effective -- a very important point, it proved to be!~ 

F. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-19-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

TOP SEGRE-r 

• 

. •
**Exhibit 23**

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on FormS-3 (No. 333-48355/48355-01) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-52810, 33-77168, 33-89298, 33-80439, 333-20993, 333-42241, 333-61669, 333-80027, 333-72758, 333-96011 and 333-113114) of Tommy Hilfiger Corporation of our report datedNovember 18, 2005 relating to the financial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,which appears in this Form 10-K. 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

New York, New York 

November 18, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>
                
<ARTICLE>             5
       
<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                        651,740
<SECURITIES>                                1,440,649 <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>                                  29,855
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            2,122,244
<PP&E>                                              0
<DEPRECIATION>                                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              2,122,244
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          87,746
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                  2,034,498 <F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                2,122,244
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              235,437 
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                 343,790
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (108,353)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (108,353)
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (108,353)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.98) <F3>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0 

<FN>
<F1>
This figure represents $1,427,594 of U.S. Treasury securities and
$13,055 of unrealized gain on open contracts.
<F2>
This figure represents $1,970,331 of Limited Partners' Capital
and $64,167 of General Partner's Capital.
<F3>
The net earnings per unit for a Limited Partner is ($.98).  The
net earnings per unit for the General Partner is ($1.00).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electro-Sensors, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Bradley D. Slye,Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofthe Company.

 

 
|                  |                                                          |
|-----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|
| August 13,  2004 | /s/ Bradley D. Slye                                           |
|                  | Bradley D. Slye                                               |
|                  | Principal Executive Officer and Principal  Accounting Officer |

 

----
# CE2004084EN.01053601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/536 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/536

---

(2004/C 84 E/0613)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0111/04

by Minerva Malliori (PSE) to the Commission

(19 January 2004)

Subject:   Dioxins in farm-raised salmon

Subject:

According to a report published in the reputable ‘Science’ journal, significant quantities of carcinogenic substances, such as PCBs, have been found in farm-raised salmon. This has caused great concern among consumers and breeders.

Given the large quantities of salmon consumed, since it is one of the healthiest fish, being rich in omega-3 fatty acids, reducing the risk of heart disease, together with the fact that it is a major source of revenue in areas such as Scotland, can the Commission confirm the reports of contaminated fish and will it take immediate measures to eliminate the danger to consumers and safeguard the livelihood of fish-breeders?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(20 February 2004)

(20 February 2004)

The Honourable Member refers to a study published in the journal ‘Science’, which analysed 246 samples of farmed and wild salmon from all over the world for 14 organochlorine contaminants, including dioxins (sum of dioxins, furans, dioxin-like PCBs) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)).

The substances, other than dioxins, mirex and PCBs are organochlorine pesticides or metabolites thereof, the use of which has been prohibited for a long time, with the exception of lindane which has been prohibited only since June 2002. Their presence in fish is due to the fact that residues of these pesticides are still present in the environment long after their prohibition, due to their very persistent nature.

Council Regulation (EC) No 2375/2001 of 29 November 2001 amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 466/2001 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs (1) establishes maximum levels for dioxins in a range of foodstuffs including fish. The levels found in this study were all below the set maximum levels. The Commission is of the opinion that the levels of dioxins and PCBs found in this study are in line with those previously found and this study does not raise any new food safety issues. No immediate action from the Commission is therefore required but the long term strategy foresees a progressive reduction of the maximum levels.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 321, 6.12.2001.

1

---
99-985.

#### Motil v. Med. Planning Serv., Inc.

In Prohibition. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 1434, 713 N.E.2d 1047. On motion for reconsideration and/or for clarification. Motion denied.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2016 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to promote the 

responsible transfer of firearms. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 

Mr. KAINE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to 

promote the responsible transfer of firearms. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Transfer 

5 of Firearms Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS. 

7 Section 922(d) of title 18, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by 

10 striking ‘‘It shall be unlawful for any person to sell 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2016 IS

1 or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammunition 

2 to any person knowing or having reasonable cause to 

3 believe that such person’’ and inserting ‘‘Unless the 

4 transferor has taken reasonable steps to determine 

5 that the recipient is not legally barred from pos6 sessing firearms or ammunition under paragraphs 

7 (1) through (9), it shall be unlawful for any person 

8 to sell or otherwise dispose of any firearm or ammu9 nition to a person who’’; 

10 (2) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘who,’’; 

11 (3) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘who’’; and 

12 (4) in paragraph (7), by striking ‘‘who,’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
p. 1



# OAR Box 1384 Prepped by Charmelle Mathews



### Document

Number: 

# 142 ) ll-E-10 2 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08 AM Sheet 142 of 26408/27/199 7 15:4 8 219784304 8

08/J6/9 7 14:0 3 ©1819941023 4 ULTR A GLA S Vh\> Ki r N C PAG E 3 2 P. 2

From : Date : Contact : Company : Contac tRepor t

Rober tJemison , Paelfi c Environmenta l Services , Inc . (PES ) Augus t25,199 7 Ms . Barbar

a Strycke r Ulira/Glas o f

Lakevillc , Inc.

^ Telephon e Number . (219 ) 784-895 9 Fa x Number : (219)784-304 8
Contac t Summary : Mr . Jemiso n contacte d Ms . Barbar a Strycke r a tUltra/Gla

s o f Lakeville , Inc . t o clarif

y informatio

n provide d i n tb e 199 7 ge l coa

tusag e informatio

n collectio n reques t(ICR) fo r th e reinforced plastic s NESHAP . Mr . Jemiso n aske d i f

th e amount

s o f styren e an d methy l methacrylat

e (MMA ) added tha

t sr e show n i n Tabl e I ofth e IC R represen

tadditiona

l styren e an d MM A adde d t o th e ge l coat s o

r th e styrene an

d MM A alread y presen tin th e ge l coa l upo

n receip tfro

m th e ge l coa tsupplier ? Ms . Strycke

r indicated tha

tth e amount

s show n represen

tth e styren e an

d MM A alread y presen ti n th e ge l coats whe n receive d fio m th e ge l coa tsupplier . Mr . Jemiso n als o requeste

d th e Materia l Safet y Dat a Sheet(MSDS ) fo r on e o f th e ge l coat s use d b y Ultra/Gla

s whic h wa s no tsubmitte

d as par tofth e ICR

. Th e MSD S dia

twa s missin g fro

m th e ICR wa s fo

r th e Olympic Whit

e ge l coa tmanufacture

d b y Ferr o Corporatio

n wit h a produ a numbe

r o f GV47056 . Ms . Strycke

r agree d t o fa x tiie MSD S fo r tiie abov e ge l coatt o PES . 

### •A-94-5 2

INFORMATIO

N I S ACCURAT

E
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2154 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the percentage 

depletion allowance for certain hardrock mines. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 7, 2015 

Mrs. SHAHEEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the percentage depletion allowance for certain hardrock 

mines. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Elimination of Double 

5 Subsidies for the Hardrock Mining Industry Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF PERCENTAGE DEPLETION ALLOWANCE 

7 FOR CERTAIN HARDROCK MINES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 613(a) of the Internal 

9 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting ‘‘(other 

10 than hardrock mines located on lands subject to the genVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:01 Oct 10, 2015 Jkt 059200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2154.IS S2154

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2154 IS

1 eral mining laws or on land patented under the general 

2 mining laws)’’ after ‘‘In the case of the mines’’. 

3 (b) GENERAL MINING LAWS DEFINED.—Section 613 

4 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by add5 ing at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(f) GENERAL MINING LAWS.—For purposes of sub7 section (a), the term ‘general mining laws’ means those 

8 Acts which generally comprise chapters 2, 12A, and 16, 

9 and sections 161 and 162 of title 30 of the United States 

10 Code.’’. 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration
statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 33-60580, 333-03895, 333-95127 and
333-95129) and Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-19195) of our report dated
February 28, 2002 (March 20, 2002 with respect to Note M) on our audit of the
financial statements included in the 2001 annual report on Form 10-K of Life
Medical Sciences, Inc. We also consent to the reference to our firm in the
Experts section of the Form S-3.

Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP

New York, New York
March 21, 2002
~a..-i.--t4'.-~ ~ 

REF ID:A~:6970 ey"- "f~~f 3 ADDRESS OFFICIAL COMMUNICATIONS TO 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE 

WASHINGTON 2!I, D. C:. DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

WASHINGTON 

March ll, 1948 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF, ARMY Sl!x:;URITY AGENCY 

Attention: CSGAS-82 

Reference is ma.de to our Purchase Order No. 19:31-48 

of September 5, 1947. It is requested that the following 

One Time Tapes be produced for the Department of State: 

Short Title 

MUNSD 

SDWN 

Editions 

201-600 

701-1200 

~+ Captain, USN, 

Chief, Division of Cryptography. 

SECRET 

eclassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 04-15-2014 

ursuantto E.O. 13526 

II
~ 

1 

I I 

' 

El 

REF ID :A10470~ 

_... i5""EPAR1'MEN"r OF DEFENSE: 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25 D C 

- IN R&:PL.Y RCl"ER TO 

AFBA•002/lpt 

Serie.ls 

74 

NOV l 6 1949 

Subject1 William F. l'riedman • Civilian Employee ot .Army securit7 Agency. 

Tot CO'nb'1lB.nd1ng General 

1rMY Security Agency 

Washington ?S, D. c. 

l. In accordance with ;your letteJ" CSOAS 072• dated 14 Uovember 

19491 the inaloauro thereto 11a11 shown to Nr. Jfillinm F. Friedman, and 

ia returned herewith. 

FOR TilE DIPLCT<P, AFSAi 

l Inol 

Ott Memo £r D/I to Ch., 

ASA, wbj as alN, dtd 

'6 Oct 49 

F. E. DI!NSMORE 

Captain. SieC 

Head, Secretariat ~anch 

~ w F ~~(r\~\ti"t"J 

(~~) 

___ @'pp roved for Release by NSA on_ 09-13-2013 Llursuantto E ~. 1352a 

\ 

"' \. 

31 

,, 

----
Subjeot: 

To: 

REF ID:A104704 

0 0 l? y 

DEPARTMENT or DEF~NSE 

Armed Forces Security Agency Wanh1ngton 25, D. C. 

AFSA-002/lpt 

Serial: 74 

NOV 16, 1949 

William r. Friedman - C1V111an Employee ot 

Army 8ecur1ty Agen~y 

Commanding General 

Army ~ecur1~y Agency 

Washington ~5, D.O. 

1. In acaordanoe w1th your letter OSGAS 072, dated 

14 November 1949, the inclosure thereto was shown to 

Mr W1111em F. Frtedman, and 18 returned herewith. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR, AFSA: 

1 !ncl 

Ott Memo tr D/I to 

Oh, ASA, subj as 

abv, dtd 26 Oat 49 

F. E. DEN6l.\ORE 

Oaptain, 61gC Hrad, 8eoretar1at Branoh 

-- -· -- - -- -·· ·- ·- . -· - - -·· -- ·-- - --· ·- .. . - . -- .. - . - ··-· -- . ··- -··· ·--- - - - . -- -- ·-- -

-
.. REF ID:A104704 

• • llP....jor A. L. Slllith/71994 

OFFICE.MEMORANDUM UNITED ST.A!fES GOVE:?NMENT 

TO : Chief, .Axrrry Security .Agency DATE: 26 Oct 1949 

FROM: The Director of Intelligence. 

SUBJECT: William F. Friedman - Civilian Employee of ASA. 

1. Reference is made to your 3d endorsement, ·dated 12 September 1949, to the 

Director of Intelligence, concerning Mr. William F. Friedman (Patent Application 

Serial No. 443,320). 

2. The Intelligence Division has no objection to Mr. Friedman's hiring private 

counsel provided no.classified inform~tion is revealed thereby. 

3. The other recommendations contained in youi• indorsement have been submitted 

to the Judge Advocate General for decision as concerns their legal aspects. 

FOR THE DIRECTOR OF INTELLIGENCE: 

Certified to be a true copy: 

~ CHSCLK, USN. 

/s/ Lionel C. McGarr 

LIONEL C. McGARR 

Colonel, GSO 

Acting Executive