alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
           Rules 13a - 14(a) and 15d - 14(a) under the Securities and
                        Exchange Act of 1934, as amended


I, Richard Augustine, the Chief Accounting Officer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of U.S. Energy Systems
Inc.

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I am responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing equivalent functions):

      (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.


Dated: August 22, 2005

/s/ Richard J. Augustine
------------------------
Richard J. Augustine
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer and Financial Officer)
Interim Decision .#1567 

MAXI= or SALAMA 

In. Deportation Proceedings 

A-10753303 

Decided by Board March 28, 1966 

Respondent's application under section 243(h), Immigration and Nationality 

Act, as amended, to withhold deportation to the United Arab Republic 

(Egypt) is granted Since he, a person of the Jewish faith, would be subject 

to persecution in that country because of his religion. 

CHARGE: 

• .Order: Aat of 1052-5aotion 241(a) (2) (S 11.5.0. 1251(a) (2)1—Exchange 

visitor—remained longer. 

The special inquiry officer found respondent deportable upon the 

ground stated above, but under section 243(h) of the Act granted 

his application for withholding deportation to the United Arab Republic (Egypt). The special inquiry officer found that respondent, 

a person of the Jewish faith would be subject to persecution in the 

United Arab Republic because of his religion. He certified his order 

to the Board because the phrase "persecution on account of race, 

religion, or political opinion" had not been construed by the Board. 

We believe the special inquiry officer properly found that the 

record established that a government campaign of discrimination 

was responsible for the departure of some 37,000 Jews from Egypt 

since 1951, leaving only between 3,000 and 4,000, including many 

who are aged and ill. In addition, evidence that the Medical Association of Egypt had directed the Egyptian populace to refrain from 

consulting Jewish surgeons and physicians for any cause, and that 

Jewish professional men have been dropped from the rolls of professional societies, establishes respondent would face persecution in 

Egypt because of his religion. 

ORDER: It is ordered no change be made in the order of the 

special inquiry officer. 

536
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsection (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsection (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of POSCO, a corporation organized under the laws of the Republic of Korea (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



/s/ Kwon, Oh-JoonKwon, Oh-JoonChief Executive Officer and Representative Director


Date: May 12, 2014



/s/ Lee, Young-HoonLee, Young-HoonPresident and Chief Financial and Planning Officer


Date: May 12, 2014

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to POSCO and will be retained by POSCO and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-50670

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CODY LYN TIMMONS,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:11-CR-388-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Cody Lyn Timmons has moved for

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). 

Timmons has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

August 20, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

 Case: 12-50670 Document: 00512347516 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
No. 12-50670

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 12-50670 Document: 00512347516 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/20/2013
REF ID:A71250 • 

--/) ~ IJ .-.-- 11 /;' 5__ - !_ --- - --

/{AD Ac ~~&r"~~,, t,,~ lJ.-

_J}::sd_~/1-c /7f?.~1c_en _____ _ 

tl $_~1_f3 ____ (~h) - --- - ------- -- -

- -------------- ) /l-(:_~(f c_ ____ (_~s ------ --

£j5p-)i}_/lif!s c;:o_hi AJ5"1~110 -<; 4if~~ 

z~~~--;_~-,;~lJ(o 0 4.~. -:IF q ~~1_~.f3_j G"o'$F :?f.<~J~ 

/f!Sj?J--~1__1! _________ (i (} P 2- 3 / 5~.f"~ ~ /avl; ,us/I~ 2G> -/o_., 2~,fo-~_ 

c(/155 -/1JJV. /5)) --
REF ID:A101371 

• (\:.; 

·!) ., ,1. '~- ~ . 

>\~· \. 

\ 

~vate Law 625 - 84th Congre s 

t Chapter 264 - 2d .Sessio 

I. • H. R. 2068 "\ .•.· 

v AN ACT .. s. \ "\. \ ,J For thfo' rfo'lief of William F. Friedman . 

.r'-~' Be it 0111dnl by thP Se1111te 1111d Houxe o.f Rep/'e.•entatfres of the 

l'nited Stafn1 of Amerfra in CongresJI a.>1>sembled, That the Secretary 

of the Treasury is authorized and. directed to pay to William F. Friedman, out of any money in the Tre~1s11rv not otherwise appropriated, 

the sum of lf;lOo,ooo, in full settlement for a 11 rights in respect of hi>' 

inYentions in eonnectiou with military, uanil, and air communication~ 

faeilities whieh are now or at any time ham been plaeed in secrecy 

status by the 'Yar Department or the Department of Defense, induding but not limited to all rights with respect to his inventions 

eove1·ed by Patent Xumbered 2,~95,86:3 and by patent application 

serials ti82,096, 107,zU, 70,·±12, ±!a,~:.w, -!78,19:3, and 5-!9,086, and 

with respect to all im·entions for which patent applications have been 

withheld by the 'Yar Department or Department of Defense in order 

to preserrn secrecy: Pro1•ided. That no part of the amount appropriated in this Act in excess of 10 per centum thereof shall be paid 

or delivered to or received by any agent or attorney on account of 

se1Tiees rendered in !'onnection with this daim and the same shall 

be unlawful, any eontrat't to the eontrary notwithstanding. Any per- son violnting the provisions of this Act shall be deemed guilty of a 

misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined in any sum not exceeding $1,000. 

Approved May 10, 1956. 

GPO 7 1128 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-21-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
Exhibit 10.1


AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO REVOLVING CREDIT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT





This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment”) dated as of April 14, 2011 to the Revolving Credit And Security Agreement referred to below by and between SyntheMed, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Borrower”), and Pathfinder, LLC, a Massachusetts limited liability company (the “Lender”).





WITNESSETH:





WHEREAS, Borrower and Lender are party to that certain Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated as of September 14, 2010, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto effective February 15, 2011 (the “Credit Agreement”); and





WHEREAS, the parties hereto desire to amend certain provisions of the Credit Agreement.





NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:





SECTION  1.  Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms that are not defined in this Amendment have the respective meanings set forth in the Credit Agreement.





SECTION  2.  Amendments to Credit Agreement.  The Credit Agreement is hereby amended as follows:





(a)           The definition of “Revolving Credit Period” in Section 1.1 is hereby amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows:





“Revolving Credit Period” means the period from and including the Closing Date to the earlier of (a) May 31, 2011 or (b) such earlier date as the Lender shall determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, upon at least five (5) Business Days’ prior written notice to the Borrower.





SECTION  3.  Effect on Credit Agreement.Except as otherwise expressly amended herein, the Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  All references in any document or agreement to the Credit Agreement shall refer to the Credit Agreement, as amended hereby.





SECTION 4.Execution in Counterparts; Facsimile Signatures. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same document. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission, such signature shall create a valid binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) the same with the same force and effect as if such facsimile signature were the original thereof.











[Signature Page Follows]










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Amendment as of the 14th day of April, 2011.







THE BORROWER:



SYNTHEMED, INC.

By: /s/ Barry Frankel

Barry Frankel, Chairman of Special Committee





THE LENDER:



PATHFINDER, LLC



By:/s/Richard L. Franklin

Richard L. Franklin, President and Manager
















[Signature Page to Amendment No. 2 to Revolving Credit and Security Agreement]







2
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Registration Numbers 333-11669, 333-42403 and 333-130077) and on Form S-3 (Registration Numbers 333-08391 and 333-08216), of our report dated March  29,  2007, on our audit of the financial statements of CPI Aerostructures, Inc. as of and for the years ended December  31,  2006, 2005 and 2004, appearing in the 2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

|        |  |  |                                    |
|--------|--|--|------------------------------------|
|   |  |  | /s/   J.H. Cohn LLP |
|   |  |  | Jericho, New York                  |
|   |  |  | March  30, 2007                    |
|        |

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MARGARET SILVIA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 15-30117

D.C. No. 2:13-cr-00022-SEH

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 26, 2016**

Before: McKEOWN, WARDLAW, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Margaret Silvia appeals from the district court’s amended judgment reducing 

her sentence from 100 to 74 months. We dismiss. 

Silvia waived her right to appeal if the government moved for a sentence 

reduction under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35 and the district court 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 29 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-30117

granted the motion. The government argues that Silvia’s appeal should be 

dismissed because the district court granted its Rule 35 motion. Silvia counters 

that the waiver is unenforceable because her sentence is illegal and the government 

breached the plea agreement. We agree with the government. Silvia’s sentence 

is not illegal because it does not exceed the statutory maximum or violate the 

Constitution. See United States v. Bibler, 495 F.3d 621, 624 (9th Cir. 2007). 

Moreover, the record reflects that the government complied with all of its 

obligations under the plea agreement, including its promise to recommend a 

sentence at the low end of the Guidelines range.

DISMISSED.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

No. 19-40947

Conference Calendar

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Joaquin Gutierrez-Pineda, 

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:19-CR-483-1

Before Davis, Elrod, and Oldham, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Joaquin Gutierrez-Pineda has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Gutierrez-Pineda has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 14, 2021

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 19-40947 Document: 00515897719 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/14/2021
No. 19-40947

2

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 19-40947 Document: 00515897719 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/14/2021
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by Chief Executive
Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly
Report of Data I/O Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Frederick R. Hume, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of           the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material           respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Frederick R. Hume 
________________________________
Frederick R. Hume 
Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) 

May 12, 2006

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

GUSTAVO A. BASMESON,

Appellant,

v.

MELBA R. BASMESON,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-2568

[April 23, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Charles E. Burton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502017DR011822XXXXSB.

Gustavo A. Basmeson, David, Chiriqui, Republic of Panamá, pro se.

Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Rebecca Mercier Vargas and Stephanie L. 

Serafin of Kreusler-Walsh, Vargas & Serafin, P.A., West Palm Beach, and 

Jeffery Jones of Legal Aid Society of Palm Beach County, West Palm 

Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, KLINGENSMITH and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 30, 2013

p0923 

# Order

Clerk September 30, 2013

147217

MAGDICH & ASSOCIATES PC,

Pla intiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147217

COA: 314518

Oakland CC: 2012

- 125729

- CK

NOVI DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LLC,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 19, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of

granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the order of the Court of Appeals, and we

REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for plenary consideration.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Neuromodulation
Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Christopher G. Chavez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate,
effective as of August 12, 2003.

| |  |                               
| |  | ------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Christopher G. Chavez     
| |  |                               
| |  | Name: Christopher G. Chavez   
| |  | Title: Chief Executive Officer
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40178

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE ALBERTO ESCOBAR-LARA,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-00-CR-451-1

--------------------

February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jorge

Alberto Escobar-Lara (Escobar) has moved to withdraw and has

filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967). Escobar has received a copy of counsel’s motion and

brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of

the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for

appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,

and the appeal is DISMISSED. 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.