12370 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

State, local, or tribal government, in the 

aggregate, or by the private sector of 

$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or 

more in any one year. Though this 

proposed rule would not result in such 

expenditure, we do discuss the effects of 

this rule elsewhere in this preamble. 

8. Taking of Private Property 

This proposed rule would not cause a 

taking of private property or otherwise 

have taking implications under 

Executive Order 12630, Governmental 

Actions and Interference with 

Constitutionally Protected Property 

Rights. 

9. Civil Justice Reform 

This proposed rule meets applicable 

standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of 

Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice 

Reform, to minimize litigation, 

eliminate ambiguity, and reduce 

burden. 

10. Protection of Children From 

Environmental Health Risks 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Executive Order 13045, 

Protection of Children from 

Environmental Health Risks and Safety 

Risks. This rule is not an economically 

significant rule and would not create an 

environmental risk to health or risk to 

safety that might disproportionately 

affect children. 

11. Indian Tribal Governments 

This proposed rule does not have 

tribal implications under Executive 

Order 13175, Consultation and 

Coordination with Indian Tribal 

Governments, because it would not have 

a substantial direct effect on one or 

more Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes. 

12. Energy Effects 

This proposed rule is not a 

‘‘significant energy action’’ under 

Executive Order 13211, Actions 

Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use. 

13. Technical Standards 

This proposed rule does not use 

technical standards. Therefore, we did 

not consider the use of voluntary 

consensus standards. 

14. Environment 

We have analyzed this proposed rule 

under Department of Homeland 

Security Management Directive 023–01 

and Commandant Instruction 

M16475.lD, which guide the Coast 

Guard in complying with the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 

(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and 

have made a preliminary determination 

that this action is one of a category of 

actions that do not individually or 

cumulatively have a significant effect on 

the human environment. This rule is 

categorically excluded from further 

review under paragraph 34(g) of Figure 

2–1 of the Commandant Instruction. A 

preliminary environmental analysis 

checklist supporting this determination 

is available in the docket where 

indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek 

any comments or information that may 

lead to the discovery of a significant 

environmental impact from this 

proposed rule. 

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 

Marine safety, Navigation (water), 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Waterways. 

For the reasons discussed in the 

preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to 

amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows: 

PART 165—SAFETY ZONES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 46 U.S.C. 

Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 

33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 

107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of 

Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. 

■ 2. Add a temporary § 165.T07–0093 to 

read as follows: 

§ 165.T07–0093 Safety Zone; Swim Around 

Lido key, Sarasota Bay; Sarasota, FL. 

(a) Regulated Areas. All waters within 

a 50-yard radius around the swimmers 

and safety vessels including kayaks. 

(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated 

representative’’ means Coast Guard 

Patrol Commanders, including Coast 

Guard coxswains, petty officers, and 

other officers operating Coast Guard 

vessels, and Federal, state, and local 

officers designated by or assisting the 

Captain of the Port St. Petersburg in the 

enforcement of the regulated areas. 

(c) Regulations. (1) All persons and 

vessels are prohibited from entering, 

transiting through, anchoring in, or 

remaining within the regulated area 

unless authorized by the Captain of the 

Port St. Petersburg or a designated 

representative. 

(2) Non-participant persons and 

vessels desiring to enter, transit through, 

anchor in, or remain within the 

regulated area may contact the Captain 

of the Port St. Petersburg by telephone 

at (727) 824–7506, or a designated 

representative via VHF radio on channel 

16. If authorization to enter, transit 

through, anchor in, or remain within the 

regulated area is granted by the Captain 

of the Port St. Petersburg or a designated 

representative, all persons and vessels 

receiving such authorization must 

comply with the instructions of the 

Captain of the Port St. Petersburg or a 

designated representative. 

(3) The Coast Guard will provide 

notice of the regulated area by Local 

Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to 

Mariners, and/or on-scene designated 

representatives. 

(d) Effective Date. This rule will be 

enforced from 8 a.m. to 2 p.m. on April 

12, 2015. 

Dated: February 18, 2015. 

G.D. Case, 

Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the 

Port St. Petersburg. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05422 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION 

34 CFR Chapter III 

[Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance 

(CFDA) Number: 84.328C.] 

Proposed Waiver and Extension of the 

Project Period for the Community 

Parent Resource Centers 

AGENCY: Office of Special Education 

Programs (OSEP), Office of Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services 

(OSERS), Department of Education. 

ACTION: Proposed waiver and extension 

of the project period. 

SUMMARY: The Secretary proposes to 

waive the requirements in the Education 

Department General Administrative 

Regulations that generally prohibit 

project periods exceeding five years and 

project period extensions involving the 

obligation of additional Federal funds. 

We take this action because this 

proposed waiver and extension of the 

project period would enable nine 

currently funded Community Parent 

Resource Centers (CPRCs) to receive 

funding from October 1, 2015, through 

September 30, 2016. 

DATES: We must receive your comments 

on or before April 8, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Address all comments about 

this proposed waiver and extension of 

the project period to Carmen Sanchez, 

U.S. Department of Education, 400 

Maryland Avenue SW., Room 4057, 

Potomac Center Plaza (PCP), 

Washington, DC 20202–2600. 

If you prefer to send your comments 

by email, use the following address: 

carmen.sanchez@ed.gov. You must 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules 12371 

include the phrase ‘‘Proposed waiver 

and extension of the project period’’ in 

the subject line of your message. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Carmen Sanchez. Telephone: (202) 245– 

6595, or by email at: carmen.sanchez@

ed.gov. 

If you use a telecommunications 

device for the deaf or a text telephone, 

call the Federal Relay Service, toll free, 

at 1–800–877–8339. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Invitation to Comment: We invite you 

to submit comments regarding this 

proposed waiver and extension. During 

and after the comment period, you may 

inspect all public comments about this 

proposed waiver and extension of the 

project period in room 4057, PCP, 550 

12th Street SW., Washington, DC, 

between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 

p.m., Washington, DC time, Monday 

through Friday of each week, except 

Federal holidays. 

Assistance to Individuals with 

Disabilities in Reviewing the 

Rulemaking Record: On request, we will 

provide an appropriate accommodation 

or auxiliary aid to an individual with a 

disability who needs assistance to 

review the comments or other 

documents in the public rulemaking 

record for this notice. If you want to 

schedule an appointment for this type of 

aid, please contact the person listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Background 

On May 3, 2010, the Department of 

Education (Department) published in 

the Federal Register (75 FR 23254) a 

notice inviting applications (2010 NIA) 

for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2010 

for up to 10 CPRCs. The CPRCs were 

funded under the Parent Training and 

Information (PTI) Program, authorized 

under sections 672 and 673 of the 

Individuals with Disabilities Education 

Act (IDEA). 

The purpose of CPRCs is to provide 

underserved parents of children with 

disabilities in targeted communities— 

including low-income parents, parents 

of limited English proficient children, 

and parents with disabilities—with the 

training and information they need to 

enable them to participate cooperatively 

and effectively in helping their children 

with disabilities to— 

(1) Meet developmental and 

functional goals, as well as challenging 

academic achievement standards that 

have been established for all children; 

and 

(2) Be prepared to lead the most 

productive, independent adult lives 

possible. 

The CPRCs provide training and 

information to parents of infants, 

toddlers, and children, from birth 

through age 26, with the full range of 

disabilities described in section 602(3) 

of IDEA by: (a) Responding to 

individual requests for information and 

support from parents of children with 

disabilities, including parents of 

children who may be inappropriately 

identified in their targeted communities; 

(b) providing training to parents of 

children with disabilities; (c) supporting 

parents of children with disabilities, as 

needed, such as helping them to prepare 

for individualized education program or 

individualized family service plan 

meetings; and (d) maintaining a Web 

site and social media presence, as 

appropriate, to inform parents in their 

targeted communities of appropriate 

resources. 

Based on the selection criteria 

published in the 2010 NIA, the 

Department made awards for a period of 

60 months to 10 organizations, nine of 

which have received FY 2014 

continuation funding: Fiesta Educativa 

in California; Parent to Parent of Miami, 

Inc. in Florida; Agenda for Children/

Pyramid Parent Training in Louisiana; 

Urban PRIDE in Massachusetts; SPEAKS 

Education, Inc. in Michigan; Education 

for Parents of Indian Children with 

Special Needs (EPICS) in New Mexico; 

Palau Parents Empowered in Palau; 

Philadelphia HUNE, Inc. in 

Pennsylvania; and Disabilities 

Information Coalition in Texas. 

The 2010 CPRC cohort’s current 

project period is scheduled to end on 

September 30, 2015. We do not believe 

that it would be in the public interest to 

run a competition for new CPRCs this 

year because the Department is in the 

process of changing the competition 

schedule for the PTI Program to make 

better use of Department resources. 

Under the proposed CPRC competition 

schedule, instead of holding three 

competitions over five years, each for 10 

CPRCs, we would hold one competition 

for 30 CPRCs for a project period of up 

to five years. We propose to fund 30 

CPRCs in FY 2016. We also have 

concluded that it would be contrary to 

the public interest to provide services to 

fewer underserved families in order to 

change the Department’s competition 

schedule. 

For these reasons, the Secretary 

proposes to waive the requirements in 

34 CFR 75.250, which prohibit project 

periods exceeding five years, as well as 

the requirements in 34 CFR 75.261(a) 

and (c)(2), which allow the extension of 

a project period only if the extension 

does not involve the obligation of 

additional Federal funds. The waiver 

would allow the Department to issue FY 

2015 continuation awards of $100,000 

to each of the nine centers in the FY 

2010 cohort. 

Any activities carried out during the 

year of this continuation award would 

have to be consistent with, or a logical 

extension of, the scope, goals, and 

objectives of the grantee’s application as 

approved in the FY 2010 CPRC 

competition. 

If the proposed waiver and extension 

of the project period are announced in 

a final notice in the Federal Register, 

the requirements applicable to 

continuation awards for this 

competition set forth in the 2010 NIA 

and the requirements in 34 CFR 75.253 

would apply to any continuation awards 

sought by the current CPRC grantees. 

We will base our decisions regarding 

continuation awards on the program 

narratives, budgets, budget narratives, 

and program performance reports 

submitted by the current grantees, and 

the requirements in 34 CFR 75.253. 

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification 

The Department certifies that the 

proposed waiver and extension of the 

project period would not have a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities. 

The only entities that would be affected 

by the proposed waiver and extension of 

the project period are the current 

grantees receiving Federal funds and 

any other potential applicants. 

The Secretary certifies that the 

proposed waiver and extension would 

not have a significant economic impact 

on these entities because the extension 

of an existing project period imposes 

minimal compliance costs, and the 

activities required to support the 

additional year of funding would not 

impose additional regulatory burdens or 

require unnecessary Federal 

supervision. 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 

This notice of proposed waiver and 

extension of the project period does not 

contain any information collection 

requirements. 

Intergovernmental Review 

This program is subject to Executive 

Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 

CFR part 79. One of the objectives of the 

Executive order is to foster an 

intergovernmental partnership and a 

strengthened federalism. The Executive 

order relies on processes developed by 

State and local governments for 

coordination and review of proposed 

Federal financial assistance. This 

document provides early notification of 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
12372 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Proposed Rules 

our specific plans and actions for this 

program. 

Accessible Format: Individuals with 

disabilities can obtain this document in 

an accessible format (e.g., braille, large 

print, audiotape, or compact disc) on 

request to the contact person listed 

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION

CONTACT. 

Electronic Access to This Document: 

The official version of this document is 

the document published in the Federal 

Register. Free Internet access to the 

official edition of the Federal Register 

and the Code of Federal Regulations is 

available via the Federal Digital System 

at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys. At this site you 

can view this document, as well as all 

other documents of this Department 

published in the Federal Register, in 

text or Adobe Portable Document 

Format (PDF). To use PDF you must 

have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is 

available free at the site. 

You may also access documents of the 

Department published in the Federal 

Register by using the article search 

feature at: www.federalregister.gov. 

Specifically, through the advanced 

search feature at this site, you can limit 

your search to documents published by 

the Department. 

Dated: March 3, 2015. 

Sue Swenson, 

Acting Assistant Secretary for Special 

Education and Rehabilitative Services. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05280 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4000–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Chapter 1 

[EPA–HQ–OA–2011–0156; FRL–9923–87– 

OA] 

Improving EPA Regulations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Notice; request for comment. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is requesting public input 

on the agency’s periodic retrospective 

review of its regulations. Executive 

Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation 

and Regulatory Review,’’ and Executive 

Order 13610, ‘‘Identifying and Reducing 

Regulatory Burdens,’’ call on all federal 

agencies to conduct a retrospective 

analysis of rules that may be outmoded, 

ineffective, insufficient, or excessively 

burdensome and to modify, streamline, 

expand, or repeal them in accordance 

with what has been learned. The EPA is 

particularly seeking public input on 

how the agency can promote regulatory 

modernization through business-process 

streamlining, facilitated by improved 

technology. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before April 8, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– 

OA–2011–0156, to the Federal 

eRulemaking Portal: http://

www.regulations.gov. Follow the online 

instructions for submitting comments. 

Once submitted, comments cannot be 

edited or withdrawn. EPA may publish 

any comment received to its public 

docket. Do not submit electronically any 

information you consider to be 

Confidential Business Information (CBI) 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. If you need to 

include CBI as part of your comment, 

please visit http://www.epa.gov/

dockets/comments.html for instructions. 

Multimedia submissions (audio, video, 

etc.) must be accompanied by a written 

comment. The written comment is 

considered the official comment and 

should include discussion of all points 

you wish to make. For additional 

submission methods, the full EPA 

public comment policy, and general 

guidance on making effective 

comments, please visit http://

www.epa.gov/dockets/comments.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

further information on this document, 

please contact Nathaniel Jutras, Office of 

Policy, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., 

Mail Code 1803A, Washington, DC 

20460, Phone: (202) 564–0301; Fax: 

(202) 564–8601; Jutras.Nathaniel@

epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

is committed to a regulatory strategy 

that effectively achieves the Agency’s 

mission of protecting the environment 

and the health, welfare, and safety of 

Americans while also supporting 

economic growth, job creation, 

competitiveness, and innovation. 

Recognizing the importance of 

reducing unnecessary red tape— 

especially for America’s small 

businesses—with Executive Orders 

13563 and 13610 President Obama 

launched a historic review of existing 

rules to eliminate, streamline or update 

those that no longer make sense in their 

current form. This effort is on track to 

produce completed actions that will 

reduce nearly $20 billion in regulatory 

costs in the near term. 

As part of this review, in August 2011 

the agency issued its Final Plan for 

Periodic Retrospective Reviews of 

Existing Regulations (http://

www.epa.gov/regdarrt/). This Plan was 

developed after extensive public 

outreach that sought input on an agency 

plan for retrospective review, as well as 

on possible reforms to modify, 

streamline, expand or repeal existing 

regulations. That outreach included 20 

public meetings, town halls, and 

Webinars with over 600 participants. 

Since 2011, the EPA has maintained an 

open comment docket for public 

feedback on the existing Plan for 

Periodic Retrospective Review of 

Existing Regulations and the subsequent 

progress reports. To date, we have 

completed 21 of our original 35 

retrospective reviews. We added five 

new reviews in July 2014. 

The EPA views this review process as 

an ongoing exercise and is seeking 

further public input to ensure our 

regulations continue to maximize net 

social benefit. The focus of this new 

request for input is on how the agency 

can promote regulatory modernization 

through business-process streamlining 

facilitated by improved technology. We 

specifically solicit comments on the 

following questions: 

D Which regulations, including 

economically significant rules, could be 

transitioned from paper to electronic 

reporting? 

D How can the EPA reduce duplicative 

reporting requirements in existing 

regulations that may overlap other 

federal requirements? 

D How can the EPA streamline or 

consolidate reporting requirements to 

reduce burden? 

D Which regulations could benefit 

from the use of existing shared services 

(such as the Substance Registry System) 

or new shared services? 

D Should the EPA create a joint 

registry of regulated facilities with states 

and tribes to streamline electronic 

reporting to multiple programs and 

maximize burden reduction? 

D Which regulations could be 

improved through the use of advance 

monitoring techniques or the 

development of mobile applications to 

facilitate environmental protection? 

D Which regulations could be 

amended to reduce the frequency of 

reporting while maintaining effective 

programs? 

D Is the same information being 

collected in multiple places, either 

across different regulations, or across 

different levels of government (Federal, 

State, Tribal, and local)? 

We request that commenters be as 

specific as possible, include any 

supporting data or other information, 

and provide a citation when referencing 

a specific regulation. In addition, in 

drafting comments, bear in mind that 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS