alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 03-14-00299-CV

IN THE THIRD CO URT OF APPEALS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS

SUVI ORR Appellant/Plaintiff

v.
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, WILLIAM

C. POWERS, JR., JUDITH LANGLOIS AND SHELBY STANFIELD, in their official capacities only Appellees/Defendants

Interlocutory Appeal from the 98th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO WI THDRAW AS APPELLANT’S ATTORNEYS

Philip Durst State Bar No: 06287850 Manuel Quinto-Pozos State Bar No: 24070459 DEATS DURST & OWEN PLLC 1204 San Antonio Street, Suite 203 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 474-6200 FAX (512) 474-7896
Withdrawing attorneys for Appellant Suvi Orr ACCEPTED 03-14-00299-CV 5633121 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/11/2015 9:51:25 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK1 The undersigned counsel, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure
6.5, respectfully files this unopposed motion to withdraw as Appellant’s attorneys.
As required by Texas Rule of Appe llate Procedure 6.5(d), Appellant’s
substitute attorney’s information is as follows:
David K. Sergi Sergi and Associates P.C. 329 South Guadalupe Street San Marcos, Texas 78666 Tel: 512-392-5010 Fax: 512-392-5042 State Bar of Texas number 18036000

Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5(d), this motion to
withdraw need not comply with Rule 6.5( a) because “an attorney substitutes for a
withdrawing attorney.”
Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.1(a)(5), Appellant’s
withdrawing attorneys have conferred with Appellees’ attorneys, who do not
oppose the present motion to withdraw.

PRAYER The undersigned counsel respectfully re quest that the Court grant this

motion to withdraw and subs titute Appellant’s counsel.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Manuel Quinto-Pozos Philip Durst TBN: 06287850 Manuel Quinto-Pozos2 TBN: 24070459 DEATS DURST & OWEN, PLLC 1204 San Antonio Street, Suite 203 Austin, Texas 78701 (512) 474-6200 (512) 474-7896 – Fax
Withdrawing attorneys for Appellant Suvi Orr

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE On May 26, 2015, pursuant to Te xas Rules of Appellate Procedure
10.1(a)(5), Manuel Quinto-P ozos conferred with She lley Dahlberg, counsel for
Appellees, regarding this motion. Ms. Dahl berg indicated on behalf of Appellees

that this motion is unopposed

. /s/ Manuel Quinto-Pozos Manuel Quinto-Pozos

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE As required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.3 and 6.5, I certify that I have delivered this document to the following on June 10, 2015:

 Shelley Dahlberg shelley.dahlberg@tex asattorneygeneral.gov Angela V. Colmenero angela.colmenero@tex asattorneygeneral.gov Assistant Attorney General Office of the Attorney General P.O. Box 12548 Austin, Texas 78711-2548 (512) 463-2120 (512) 320-0667 FAX Attorneys for Appellees3 (Via email)

 Dr. Suvi Orr
(Via email and via certified and firs t class mail at la st known address)

 David K. Sergi david@sergilaw.com Sergi and Associates P.C. 329 South Guadalupe Street San Marcos, Texas 78666 Attorneys for Appellant
(Via email)
/s/ Manuel Quinto-Pozos Manuel Quinto-Pozos
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 135 

To prohibit Federal agencies from mandating the deployment of vulnerabilities 

in data security technologies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 8, 2015 

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal agencies from mandating the deployment 

of vulnerabilities in data security technologies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Data Act of 

5 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DATA SECURITY VULNERABILITY 

7 MANDATES. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

9 (b), no agency may mandate that a manufacturer, devel10 oper, or seller of covered products design or alter the secuVerDate Sep 11 2014 05:13 Jan 15, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S135.IS S135

smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 135 IS

1 rity functions in its product or service to allow the surveil2 lance of any user of such product or service, or to allow 

3 the physical search of such product, by any agency. 

4 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply to 

5 mandates authorized under the Communications Assist6 ance for Law Enforcement Act (47 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). 

7 (c) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 

8 (1) the term ‘‘agency’’ has the meaning given 

9 the term in section 3502 of title 44, United States 

10 Code; and 

11 (2) the term ‘‘covered product’’ means any com12 puter hardware, computer software, or electronic de13 vice that is made available to the general public. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Biomet, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended November 30, 2009 filed on the date hereof with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b) Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                 |  |  |  |                                                  
|---------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------
|January 14, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/ JEFFREY R. BINDER                            
|                 |  |  |  | Jeffrey R. Binder                                
|                 |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                 |  | 
|January 14, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/ DANIEL P. FLORIN                             
|                 |  |  |  | Daniel P. Florin                                 
|                 |  |  |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 25 (Friday, February 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6687-6688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-02347]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ARCTIC RESEARCH COMMISSION

103rd Commission Meeting

January 29, 2015.
    Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Arctic Research Commission 
will hold its 103rd meeting in Washington, District of Columbia, on 
March 4-5, 2015. The business sessions, open to the public, will 
convene at 9:00 a.m.
    The Agenda items include:

(1) Call to order and approval of the agenda
(2) Approval of the minutes from the 102nd meeting
(3) Commissioners and staff reports
(4) Discussion and presentations concerning Arctic research activities.

    The focus of the meeting will be on Arctic policy issues, and on 
programs and research projects affecting the Arctic.
    If you plan to attend this meeting, please notify us via the 
contact information below. Any person planning to attend who requires 
special accessibility features and/or auxiliary aids, such as sign 
language interpreters, must inform the Commission of those needs in 
advance of the meeting.
    Contact person for further information: John Farrell, Executive 
Director, U.S. Arctic Research

[[Page 6688]]

Commission, 703-525-0111 or TDD 703-306-0090.

Kathy Farrow,
Communications Specialist.
[FR Doc. 2015-02347 Filed 2-5-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
```
(' 

.. 

S!leit!T 

Vl6/F298 

REF ID:A44012 

-·~ -- !.----?~Oi'CZ0'2T ···- .... -5 

MEMORANDUM FOR Director, JIT.S.A. 

• 

BRITISH EMBASSY 

UASHINGTON 

13th March, 1961 

SUbject : Visit by Director, L.C.S.A. 

r hel:e~ that you are alread;y avare that 'MY Director, l will be visiting Washington for the NATO C-E Board 

and hopesoake the opportunity to visit N.S.A. to discuss 

outstanding problems. 

~ na: s+ ninard ha.s now advised me that, accompanied by 

!' he will arrive in Ha.sh.ington on 24th April and, 

........,,s""uo,,.,,...,.j.,,..ec=.,......,,t"""'o,.....,,.,y"""our agreement, he wou1d like to spend 25th and 

26th April at your Agency. 

3. He has in mind that he should spend 25th April with 

Director, CSEC discussing Comsec matters generally and that on 

26th April he shou1d visit Fort Meade. At Fort Meade he plans 

to call on yourself, Dr. Ku1lback and l-'.ir. Ma.thews and, in 

ad.di ti on, he hopes that an opportunity cou1d be provided for a 

general discussion about Comsec Release Policy and current 

problems related thereto. 

4. I should be grateful for your con:f'irmation that this proposed visit by :VJr. Stannard accompan~ecLb~ I is 

acceptable to you. Both are, Q:f' course 1 Cat III cleared. 

~i 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

..... : .. 

i"'~-~:~··_:/ • .-• •, •I• o ·- ~ • • . ~·
- ------ REF ID:A63691 

a.n.1or Sta.rt otticera• Course 

Mr. Friedma.n 

Special A•eiatant 

19 Jan 55 

l. On l9 Hovelllber 19'4 I 1ugse1ted that 90lll9 Yerf uscti\1.l ad c011$tru.ct1ve 

thinking Jl1ght be ga.112ed tor RSA 11' t1m ve:re provid.ed at the •nd ot the Senior 

etatt Otticera• Courae f!or the •tudeAt• to write or:tcirl&l u4 ta:lrly exteuiv. 

J,i&per• (undel- comitions or pri'V&Cl and academic f'reedom) relative to the :adaaion 

ot ISA.. Thi• a~estion vu aent (Incl. l) to m/mon. DD/CQ)7SE.a~ tJD/RAD, am. 

1'IG t~ comments (Inc:i.. 2 .. 5). 

2. IJl pneraJ., the CODllll9J1t8 im1ca.te esreement with the 5usgttBtion. 

lr.<wever, DD/COMSEO seems to :teal (Incl. 5) that eelected IUbJeots on apecltic 

probleme lf}lou.14 be aaa1gnad ti.ae officers. It' M ofticeI" wre at a l.oas to 

thi!S or a pertinent aubjeot tbat he himaelt woulcl. be interested in wr1t1~ abaUt, 

•UCh •P1CU'io pidance '1'0Ul4 BUTOl¥ bEl 1.Uletul.• ~ · :119rhaps it would. be best (ud. . ceJ'ta:tu:q it 'VOUl4 be m:n'9 enc0UN3ing or in4ependent thoutht) ~or tbeee ottieera 

to aeleot their own SUbJecta ind.epmden~ and. then su.brd.t them -tc:sr a~ 

prior to "the time allotted tor their :reaearch and vriting. In thi• -.nner, an 

element ot cQntrol Wt)U].d. be 1ntro4uced 'Vi thout unn4'ce•sar~ l.imitilig the 

&cadtm1 c freedom. 

J• !1'he authority to vhom. au.ch llUbJeeta voul.d 'be aubmitted tar approval. 

an«. to 1'bom 11uch i.pe:ra 'WOUl.4. be au.bm1tte4 t~ review 1a wiclear. l believe 

it. Jd,gb.t appropr1a:te~ 'M :placed on the new Depu.t1 Ch.tet o'Z atatt, OperatiOtUt• 

I think !'IG ~ prorida working space, •terials, am aas:latonce a. needed.. 

Ji.. 'l.'bia :ma.tte:r- 19 reternd to you ~or JOUl" cOllllllttnt• &TJIJ./or approval. 

Incl.It 5 

&/• 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

-. .:: -- - .!!! 

.. _.. . - ··-i
**Exhibit 8.1**

 

List of Subsidiaries

 

 
| **1.** | CalciTech Synthetic Minerals Ltd,  a Bermuda Company ("CSM")**** |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **2.** | CalciTech Group Services SA, a Swiss corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of CSM    |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **3.** | CalciTech Holding ApS, a Danish corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of CSM ("CHA") |
| **4.** | CalciTech Deutschland GmbH, a German corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of CHA    |
| **5.** | CalciTech Odda AS, a Norwegian corporation and an entity in which CHA owns 51%**** |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
<PAGE>

                                                                EXHIBIT 11

                       COMPUTATION OF LOSS PER SHARE
            FOR THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND 1998



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                      1999            1998
                                                  -------------    -------------
<S>                                              <C>              <C>

Net loss                                           $(14,830,642)    $ (9,665,503)

Deduct:
 Accretion, discount and dividends on
  preferred stock                                                      3,210,333
                                                  -------------    -------------

Net loss applicable to common shareholders         $(14,830,642)    $(12,875,836)
                                                  -------------    -------------

Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding                                          7,382,618        3,696,372
                                                  -------------    -------------
                                                  -------------    -------------

Basic loss per share                                $     (2.01)    $      (3.48)
                                                  -------------    -------------
                                                  -------------    -------------

Net loss for diluted loss per share
 computation                                       $(14,830,642)     $(9,665,503)
                                                  -------------    -------------
                                                  -------------    -------------

Weighted average number of common shares
 outstanding                                          7,382,618        3,696,372

Common share equivalent applicable to:
 Warrants - Class A                                     128,407          411,127
 Warrants - Class B                                     154,285          493,983
 Warrants - Class C                                       9,067           16,567
 Warrants - Other                                     1,090,097          882,724
 Stock options                                        1,002,157          862,446

Less common stock acquired with net proceeds         (2,384,013)      (2,505,145)
                                                  -------------    -------------

Weighted average number of common shares and
common share equivalents used to compute
diluted loss per share                                7,382,618        3,858,074
                                                  -------------    -------------
                                                  -------------    -------------

Diluted loss per share                              $     (2.01)     $     (2.51)
                                                  -------------    -------------
                                                  -------------    -------------
</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12246-12247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05267]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9052]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Art With Benefits: The Drigung Tradition''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Art With Benefits: The Drigung 
Tradition,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the Rubin Museum of Art, New York, New York, from on or about April 24, 
2015, until on or about September 7, 2015, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The

[[Page 12247]]

mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor 
(Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 25, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-05267 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XVI 1999 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000351931
<NAME> CNETURY PROPERTIES FUND XVI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             541
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          15,620
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,934)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,752
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          7,327
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,089
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,752
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   763
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   695
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 153
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        68
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.48<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jose Antigua, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 301]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Megan Tallmer, J.), rendered September 25, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him to a term of JVa to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses his claim that the court failed to exercise any discretion in sentencing *(see People v*Callahan, 80 NY2d 273 [1992]; *People v*Diaz, 304 AD2d 468 [2003], *lv denied*100 NY2d 561 [2003]). Were we *273to conclude otherwise, we would find defendant’s claim to be unpreserved and unavailing. We note that defendant’s sentence was lawful, and that he received the minimum sentence permitted by law. The question of whether defendant deserved even further leniency, by way of a plea to a lesser offense, was a matter of prosecutorial discretion *(Weatherford v Bursey,*429 US 545, 561 [1977]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Saxe and Friedman, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000352447
<NAME>                        Northwest Gold, Inc.

<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             MAY-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                JUN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  NOV-30-2000
<CASH>                        12,000
<SECURITIES>                  4,100
<RECEIVABLES>                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              16,100
<PP&E>                        29,000
<DEPRECIATION>                29,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                18,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         9,700
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      7,800
<OTHER-SE>                    500
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  8,300
<SALES>                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              300
<CGS>                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              9,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (8,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (8,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (8,700)
<EPS-BASIC>                   0
<EPS-DILUTED>                 0



</TABLE>