alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                        Certification of CFO Pursuant to

                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

                             As Adopted Pursuant to

                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kemper Investors Life Insurance
Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Frederick L. Blackmon, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

            Dated: August 14, 2002             /s/ Frederick L. Blackmon
                                               ------------------------------
                                                   Frederick L. Blackmon
                                                   Chief Financial Officer



This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 66 (Thursday, April 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20633]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8130]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS12-06]

Appraisal Subcommittee Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council

ACTION: Notice of Meeting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Description: In accordance with Section 1104(b) of Title XI of the 
Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, 
as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee 
(ASC) will meet in closed session:
    Location: OCC--250 E Street SW., Room 8C, Washington, DC 20219.
    Date: April 11, 2012.
    Time: Immediately following the ASC open session.
    Status: Closed.
    Matters To Be Considered:
    March 14, 2012 minutes--Closed Session.
    Preliminary discussion of State Compliance Reviews.

    Dated: March 30, 2012.
James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2012-8130 Filed 4-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
**CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Paul F. Folino, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EmulexCorporation;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report in being prepared; b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarterthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal controlover financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 4, 2004   /s/ Paul F. Folino Paul F. FolinoChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31A
Speaker: Carroll Robinson 

Williams: Did you ever have any run-ins...? Because you were in management, 

and there are social functions—sometimes luncheons. Did you ever have any 

run-ins in the local establishments because of...? 

Robinson: Not a run-in, no. 

Williams: But in terms of not getting service, did you have any incidents like 

that? 

Robinson: Not here. 

Williams: Mm mm. 

Robinson: But in Philadelphia, we had a problem that’s...We were on a business 

trip. 

Williams: I see. 

Robinson: And we all went to this restaurant, and they wouldn’t serve me. And 

so, all the fellows got up and walked...All...Everybody left. (B% And the 

business) (1B)... 

Williams: This was a TDY? 

Robinson: Yeah. So they said, “Well, you’re not going to serve him?” And then, 

everybody got up and left. So... 

Williams: That was the only time that occurred? 

Robinson: That’s the only time that it occurred. So...
""" ·-' 

STANDARD FORM NO. 64 - • ~~ ~ ~lD 13 0'3 ~ RE:::?_I~~·~ SECURITY IWFOffi·f}\TIOW 

Office Memorandum • UNITED sTATEs GovERNMENT 

TO 

FROM 

SUBJECT: 

Colonel MaNJ', Chief ot Statt 

Mr. stautter, 302L 

Pending Medan Billa 

DA TE: 21 February 1952 

1. The pr1ncipal maohines and derloea oarared b.r app11oatio.ns area 

a. SIGABA. (aerial 1'Ullber 70,'12 .... Im'entorst Madman and Rowlett) -

Appraxlatel.7 3330 ot these aahinea vve built at a cost ot $5,9251000 and ware 

v.t.d.elT ...... 

b. SIOCUM (aerial maber 443,320 - limmtoraa P.r:tedman and Rowlett) - AppzoOldJnatel.7 3220 meh:lnel were built at a coat ot $1.1719,325.0S and vere widelJ" 

used.. 

•• smrar (aerial number S491086 • I12Yentor1 Pried.man) • ApproxinatelJ" 

12,000 mohinu were bullt at a ooet ot tl.,617,884.25 and were never put into 

t:leld ue. 

SE CURI 'fY IM'.E'OillvIA'I' ION Ri:aTRIC'f~D 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
.. 

REF ID:A101303 

RES'fRIC'f~D SEC URI 'f' Y IUF OFdiA'f' I O~if 

2. Appliaatian serial numben 682,096 and lrn,244 cavered the early approaches 

to the SIGA.BA. The maohines represented by these applicaticm.s were not made in large 

quantities nor widel.7 uedf total quantity, probably, less than 100. 

3. l\ltent number 2,395,863 covers a strip ciJiier device (M-13S) which was used 

to sane extent but 'WBB not opareticmslly important.. 

4. Applieation serial mtmber 478,193 (now patent number 5S2,S~) discloees a 

relay-operated circuit tor prorl.ding tao8Wl.e pr.lft.CQ" by a.bin1Dg an intelligence 

signal with a d.uJarlv aipal b.r so-called Vernam addition. Thia dnioe was nner used 

although Mr. Medlnan teela that it Jl!'C'lided the be.sis tor much ot the later work 1Jl 

f'aoaimile Jriw.q. 

BECURI'f'Y IMFOF:::1'11\TION 

HENRI B. STAUmll 

Head, 302L 

RES'f'RIC'fED
-··-·:. --·,-.·-

MEMO ROUTING SLIP ~ FOA M'~!.~~~~a 

1 llAllE CIR Tl1U · Co&.. s ttil.h,.., AllllTIAW CIRCUUTE 

a 

3 

OUAlllZATION Ale . 

DATE COCIRDINATIClll 

PD.I 

INPDRllAnmi 

- llEClllSARY 

AC:nOll 

NCnE AND 

lll11IRJI 

- EllE 

- •llATURE 

>. 

pproved for Release by NSA on 

4-02-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

= 0

- 0 FOlll 95 ~DA.l00~-1.lprG,8114.lll'BQ ................ I FEB 110 J'mm 11. 10 Nov '7, wJdab mar tie 1llld. . . 
U. L GOVERNIUllT 

MEMORANDUM OF CALL Date 

TOD 'l'OU WBltB C.U.LBD BT- D 'l'OU 'WBU 'V!BITl:D BYMIL PBRS 

I Number or aade 

2'BLBPBOJl'B: 

D PLBAIB CALL 

D 'WILL CALL AGAIN 

D ltBTUllNDl'CI TOUR CAl.L 

D WAITIKG TO BBB 'l'OU 

D Wl8BBI AN .APPOIKTIUUIT 

LBl'T Tm• MBllAGB: Wiggington baa left aau 

. Ce.raon and is on hi• 1181' to ISA, has not 

arrived u ;yet, perhaps taki.Jlg a del.q in 

route. Will noti1'y 1'0U when he arr:tvea. 

I ReceJvec1 i.y1 U. 8, -•H•llllT nlllTI•• GPFIC& ~l-1 
.. 

- ... -·· 

4 •• fl' . . ..:.·.-:. 
NEMO. · .ROUTING SLIP 

INITIALS CIRCULATE 

~- .·>·.: .... : .. -~~~--~TION. 2 . Fil.I! 

I 

~. tf6M6 ........ Y'7. 

·Ar. M•v,,/1~ (,i,i,Jl'•rd wnll ,..,,..,. A. 

lllFORllATIClll 

NOMAND 

REruRll 

-·· 

SlillATURI 

&keelc ou1"" ,,,; '1'11 f-'4,,.,fJ.8' w AuA 

_t.,JJ1/I /,f Md ""'""" 

ft·.·· .. FROM MME OR TITLE DATE 

l--'-"-'··..,--~---.~~~~~~~~1'~/)," CIRU.tiu.:noit AllD LGCATIOH TELEPHOllE 

· . o· ··o· ..... ·.9· 5 BeplaaieDAAOOl'orm881,1Apr'8,aad.A.J'HQ · · < ·. · . · l'RHO . , lraim n..10 Nov 47. wldab mar Iii 1lllicL 
. ··~· ~ "-/! ' ·. . . 

. ·~.J&MO: ROUTING SLIP· . . .. ~~. -. . . . . . 

. '.:,.•. 

,~~~,rr~ ,,' 

, 14~~~1f?E~ 

a 

4· 

INITIALS 

DATE · - , . 

CIRCUlATE • 

COORDlllATIOlll 

FlLI!: 

iNFORMATIOK 

NECESSARY 

ACTION 

N01J! AND 

RETURN'· 

SEE ME
Full Satisfaction of Mortgage



 Exhibit 10.1(d) 

FULL SATISFACTION OF MORTGAGE 
 Know all men, that the undersigned hereby certifies that a certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Leases, Fixture Filing, Timber Filing and Financing Statement executed by PFHI
Idaho Investment LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and recorded on December 8, 2008 as Instrument No. 337167 in the records of the Clerk of the District Court of Valley County, Idaho, is fully satisfied and discharged. 

The lien of the undersigned is hereby released. 
 Dated as of: June 28, 2011 
  

			
	 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., in its capacity as
 Collateral Agent

		
	By:	 	     /s/   Anthea Del
Bianco




			
	Name:	 	Anthea Del Bianco



			
	Title:	 	Vice President









 State of California 
 County of San Francisco 
 On this 28th day of June, in the year 2011, before me, a
Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared Anthea Del Bianco, known or identified to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed same. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written.

  

			
	     /s/   Liliana Claar

	            Liliana Claar, Notary
Public

	Notary Public for the State of	 	
California




			
	Residing at:	 	
 




			
	Commission Expires:	 	     February 1, 2012



 /s/   Notary Seal 

  
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000889469
<NAME> BLUE BIRD CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          NOV-02-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-29-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-02-1996
<CASH>                                      46,253,258
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               45,657,373
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 69,775,802
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           166,990,601
<PP&E>                                      64,598,711
<DEPRECIATION>                            (25,709,736)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             391,030,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       86,573,208
<BONDS>                                    131,350,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    29,382,048
<OTHER-SE>                                  74,882,812
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               391,030,747
<SALES>                                    570,184,841
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           570,184,841
<CGS>                                      474,066,847
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               46,398,911
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           (7,222,882)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,889,261
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             40,052,704
<INCOME-TAX>                                14,872,343
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         25,180,361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            (1,415,302)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,765,059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00263

- CV
G ADBERRY C ONSTRUCTION C OMPANY , I NC ., Appellant

V

.

R OBERT R

ANEY D / B / A S TAMPED C ONCRETE , Appellee §
§
§
§ On Appeal from the 141st District Court
of Tarrant County (141

- 291001

- 17 )
July 18, 2019
Opinion by Justice Kerr
JUDGMENT
This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there
was no error in the trial court’s judgment. We affirm the trial court’s judgment and

order Appellant Gadberry Construction Company, Inc. to pay all appellate costs

.
We further order that Appel lee Robert Raney d/b/a Stamped Concrete have
and recover from Appellant Gadberry Construction Company, Inc. and from its cash
deposit in lieu of supersedeas bond the amount adjudged in the trial court’s judgment
together with any unpaid appellate costs, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS
By

_ /s/ Eli zabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
EXHIBIT 32(a)
                                                                   -------------


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics,  Inc. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  quarter  ending  June  30,  2003,  as  filed  with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"),  hereby certifies to the best
of the undersigned's  knowledge and belief,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



         Date: August 11, 2004     By:   /s/  Robert A. Lerman
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                           Robert A. Lerman
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise  subject to the liability of that
section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities  Exchange Act
of 1934,  except to the  extent  that the  small  business  issuer  specifically
incorporates it by reference.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7099

ALVIN LAWRENCE JARRETT,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (CA-03-734-2)

Submitted: October 15, 2004 Decided: November 8, 2004

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Alvin Lawrence Jarrett, Appellant Pro Se. Amy L. Marshall, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Alvin Lawrence Jarrett seeks to appeal the district

court’s order accepting the report and recommendation of a

magistrate judge and dismissing as untimely his petition filed

under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the

final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a circuit justice or

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue

absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this

standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that

his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Jarrett has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Form S-3 No. 333-52820 dated December 27, 2000, Form S-8 No. 333-40674 dated
June 30, 2000, and Form S-8 No. 333-92607 dated December 10, 1999, of Online
Resources Corporation and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated
February 11, 2002, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of
Online Resources Corporation included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
year ended December 31, 2001.

                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP


MCLEAN, VIRGINIA
MARCH 26, 2002
Exhibit 10.75



TERMINATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT



This Agreement (the Agreement) is entered into as of October 20, 2003 (the Effective Date), by and
between Microsoft Corporation, a Washington corporation (Microsoft), and ePresence, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation (ePresence).



For valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by both parties, the parties agrees as follows:



1. Payment. On the Effective Date, ePresence shall pay to Microsoft
the sum of $6.5 million by wire transfer to an account designated by Microsoft.



2. Termination. As of the Effective Date, the Alliance Agreement dated as of January 8, 1999, as amended, between Microsoft and ePresence (the Alliance Agreement) shall terminate and neither
Microsoft nor ePresence shall have any further rights or obligations thereunder, except that the provisions of Sections 8.1, 9, 11, 12 and 14 (other than Section 14.4) shall survive such termination and remain in effect.



3. Warrants. As of the Effective Date, the Common Stock Warrant dated
January 8, 1999 issued by ePresence to Microsoft providing for the right of Microsoft Corporation to purchase up to 1,750,000 shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, of ePresence, and the Warrant Purchase Agreement dated as of January 8,
1999 made by and between ePresence and Microsoft, shall terminate (unexercised) and shall be of no further force or effect.



4. Releases.



(a) ePresence does hereby release and forever discharge Microsoft from all claims that ePresence has or may have in any way relating to
the Alliance Agreement.



(b) Microsoft does
hereby release and forever discharge ePresence from all claims that Microsoft has or may have in any way relating to the Alliance Agreement.



5. General. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all which shall constitute one and
the same agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof.



ePRESENCE, INC.By:

/s/    WILLIAM P. FERRYName:

William P. FerryTitle:

Chairman and CEOMICROSOFT CORPORATIONBy:

/s/    JOHN G. CONNORSName:

John G. ConnorsTitle:

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

CAMBRIDGE               Cooperative Marketing Agreement
HEART

  Friday, May 7, 1999


  Mark Bartell
  VP of Marketing
  CPI/Guidant
  4100 Hamline Avenue North
  St. Paul, MN 55112-5798
  Fax: 651-582-5933


  Dear Mark:

  This letter confirms our agreement to cooperate in educating physicians about
  the clinical use and benefits of T-wave alternans measurement. Specifically
  we agree:

  1.  Guidant will identify and make available speaking opportunities for
      presentations on T-wave alternans at Guidant sponsored national and
      regional seminars and symposia in the U.S.

  2.  Cambridge Heart will identify speakers for these opportunities and will
      pay their travel expenses and honoraria.

  3.  It is the non-binding intent of both parties that Guidant will identify
      and Cambridge Heart will pay for at least three such opportunities per
      calendar quarter.

  4.  Cambridge Heart will additionally make available to Guidant educational
      materials that can be given to clinicians by Guidant sales
      representatives.

  5.  The parties agree to periodically consult on other means of potential
      cooperation.

  6.  The term of this agreement is through December 31, 2000. It can be
      terminated at any time by 30 day written notice of either party.

  Yours sincerely,


  /s/ Jeff Arnold
  Jeffrey M. Arnold
  Chairman, President and CEO


  Agreed:   /s/ Mark Bartell        Date     5-14-99
         -------------------------       ----------------------
         Mark Bartell
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION

Cause Number: 01-12-01165-CV

Trial Court Cause 

Number: 1174311

Style: Port Arthur Steam Energy LP

v Oxbow Calcining LLC

Date motion filed*: April 19, 2013

Type of motion: Unopposed motion for extension of time to file reply brief

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed: reply brief

Is appeal accelerated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: May 7, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 0

Date Requested: 30 days

Ordered that motion is:

X Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: June 6, 2013

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually 

Date: April 22, 2013