alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## THEA~~~NEY GENERAL. OF TEXAS

.~ February 17, 1939 Han';Birl Conneti, Jr. CFlnili~~~l~Dlfi.ti-l~t Attorney Eastland, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion-No.Ok-323 Re: Requirement that tioter obtain city poll tax to vote In municipal election. Your letter of February 4th has been received, requesting our opinionwhether a voter may be required to obtain a city poll tax in order to vote in a municipal election.

R.C.S.,

We~resp~~tfullydlredt your attention to'Artlcle 1030, 1925, as amended, same reading as follows: "The City Council shall have power to levy and collectariannual poll t&x, not to exceed One ($1.00)Dollar to every Inhabitantof s&Id city over the'age of twenty-one (21)and under sixty (60)years, those persons exemptby law from paying the State Poll Tax except&l,who Is a resident thereof at the time of such annual assessment." The exact questions you raise do not aeem to have been passed upon by our courts of last report.

However, an'elaborate conference opinionwaPj wrltteii~

by Eon. Elbert Booper, First Assist&it Attorney General,--on March 27~;1934. (SeeReport and Opinions oft Attoi9iey

General, 1932- 1934; Op. No. 2945, p. 265) This opinionpassed tiponall the questlohs of the constltutionalltyof the requirements of tiltlea

&I to city poll taxes, and held a resident of a city. authorized to levy a clty'poll tax nesthave duly paid ‘game, as well as the state and county poll tax In ord@ to qtiallfy aa a voter In City electlons. Of course, this couldnot be extended to require payment of such city poll tax as a prerequisite to voting in state and county elections.

Mr. Hooper's opinion has been repeatedly followed In letter opinions ,subsequentto Its rendition. We agree with the pertinentprovisions of Mr. Booper'sHon. Earl Conner,Jr., February 

### 17, 1939,page 2 

### O-323

opinion,and you are advised it is within the constitutional $mwer of the Cit.3 of Eastland to~requlre voters to obtain a citypoll tax receipt in order to vote in the municipal election. By 'ourholding above, your secondquestionneed not be answered. Yours very truly ATTORNEYGENERALOFTEXAS By s/k3enj&lnWoodall Benjainln

Woodall Assistant BW:AW:+, APPROm: e/GeraldC. Mann AT!PORNEYI?KERALOF TEXAS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         March 12, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on March 4, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 115 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2015-35, CP2015-46.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-05630 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-25-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1997             DEC-27-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-26-1998             MAR-27-1997
<CASH>                                           1,850                   8,113
<SECURITIES>                                    26,228                  24,855
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,902                   6,072
<ALLOWANCES>                                       404                     394
<INVENTORY>                                      8,330                   8,158
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                45,717                  52,704
<PP&E>                                          22,194                  21,576
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,259                  18,187
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,801                  57,736
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,984                  19,478
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        16,921                  16,412
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,894                  18,202
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,801                  57,736
<SALES>                                          8,426                  11,867
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,426                  11,867
<CGS>                                            4,770                   5,909
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,746                   5,358
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (466)                    (75)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     7                       9
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  33                      51
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,664)                     615
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29                     183
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,693)                     432
<DISCONTINUED>                                     180                   (384)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,513)                      48
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.21)                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.21)                    0.01
        

</TABLE>
pproved for Release by NSA on 09-06-2013 pursuant 

o E.O. 13526 
•• ~ ·~ ~ 

REF ID :JA67 995 

:r 

\ , 

I 

t ~ /i 9 

0 ·- 1,.. l. 'f s- " , ~ 000 !l1) 0 0 0000 

C>OC> C) QQ OOOu 

00 0 OoOOC)F.><) 

------... --

--

'" _..o G\J,~ 

' lo'\. 1 i.o ~10 .l.O\ 

Io~ DO 310 ?>ol 

\ 0 .q.. \.qo 4 ft> <f-9 I 

I I 

JI '. 

l
Aldine Travel Inc. | """ ""^^ 

/9] St. Louis, Missouri 63124 

WORLD TRAVEL SPECIALISTS ^^ ^ (314)994-7878 

•^' ^ (800) 762-3385 

Fax: (314) 994-1374 

www.aldinetravel.com 

March 9, 2010 

en The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary ^ 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE > • - - c5 

Washington, D.C. 5 ^ 

20590 , ^ 

3 

o 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of American's application to 

provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy International Airport and Los Angeles International 

Airport to Tokyo International Airport at Haneda. 

I recognize and applaud you and the Obama administration for your success last December in reaching a 

landmark Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from New York and Los 

Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection between three of the world's largest 

financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld AUiance membership, 

have underscored American's strong commitment to the trans-Pacific market. American is likewise 

committed to New York and Los Angeles - both vital focal points of business, trade, entertainment, 

technology and education - providing unsurpassed air service since the mid-19005 

Both the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic benefits from these 

proposed new flights, as will American's customers and employees. However, we need your help to 

make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

Therefore, I strongly urge you to say yes to American Airlines and its request for slots to fly from Kennedy 

and Los Angeles to Haneda! 

Sincerely, 

Nancy Stein, Pre! 

VIRTUOSO MEMBER 

American Society of Travel Apents / Airline Reporting Corp. International Airlines Travel Agent Network Cruise Lines International A.SSCK.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1689 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to reduce the funding available 

for a State under the national highway performance program and the 

surface transportation program if the State issues a license plate that 

contains an image of a flag of the Confederate States of America, 

including the Battle Flag of the Confederate States of America. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 25, 2015 

Mr. BROWN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to reduce the funding 

available for a State under the national highway performance program and the surface transportation program 

if the State issues a license plate that contains an image 

of a flag of the Confederate States of America, including 

the Battle Flag of the Confederate States of America. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCTION OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CER4 TAIN FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAMS. 

5 Section 104 of title 23, United States Code, is 

6 amended by adding at the end the following: 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1689 IS

1 ‘‘(h) REDUCTION OF APPORTIONMENT FOR CERTAIN

2 FEDERAL-AID HIGHWAY PROGRAMS.—The amount ap3 portioned to a State under paragraphs (1) and (2) of sub4 section (b) shall be reduced by an amount equal to 5 per5 cent of those funds— 

6 ‘‘(1) effective beginning on October 1 of the 

7 first fiscal year beginning after the date of enact8 ment of this subsection, for each fiscal year in which 

9 the State issues a license plate that contains an 

10 image of a flag of the Confederate States of Amer11 ica, including the Battle Flag of the Confederate 

12 States of America; and 

13 ‘‘(2) effective beginning on October 1 of the 

14 second fiscal year beginning after the date of enact15 ment of this subsection, for each fiscal year in which 

16 the State allows a license plate described in para17 graph (1) and issued by the State before the first 

18 fiscal year referred to in that paragraph to be dis19 played on a motor vehicle registered in the State.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 22

                        Subsidiaries of the Registrant

     The Company has a 99.3% owned subsidiary, Ecco Industries, Inc., a Delaware
Corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary, International Electronics Europe
Limited, a United Kingdom Corporation.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 20240 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

BRANDON REECE

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:17

- CR

- 62

- 1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Brandon Reece has moved for leave

to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Reece h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s
assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED January 24, 2019

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-20240 Document: 00514808295 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/24/2019No. 18

- 20240

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from furthe r responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-20240 Document: 00514808295 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/24/2019
REF 

DISPOSITION FORM 

FILE Nil. 

Tltlliefs or Of'f'ices and 

Staff Divisions 

l. CHIEF OF STAFF 

iU.iJEIOT Digest of Staff Conference, 3 August 1954 

FROM C S 

Announced the a.ppointme11t of Captain E.S.L. Goodwin, USN, as 

Inspector General. 

1 \ .. 

COMMENT NO. 1 

Requests for additional office space by Chief's ot Offices aitd Stef'f' 

Di visions miist be approved by the Deputy Chief' of Staff'. Because of the 

already overcrmrded conditions, it is 1.mpoesible to assign anyone new apace 

without a rE-viev of space assignments. Space may be withdrawn where the 

s1tuat1on warrants but only at the e~nae of the cur.rent holder. 

2. PR.'.>DUCTION 

We have ca:opleted a study on :r.ealloce.tioo or space :follow1ng the 

interim mcive. Indications are that thnre will be 57 square feet per person 

after the interim move if' tne swing sh:lf't is continued. 

3. PERSONBEL 

Announced that preparations are under way for a-program to be held 

Wednesd&Jr, U August 1954, at MIS Post ·1.'hea.ter for personnel of NSA who have c~leted 10 years of service. The Dir1M:tor and his Staff will be present, 

at which time he will acknowledge the sr.~ce of these people. 

4. TECHNICAL IBFORMATIOlT 

The third and final edition of ·War Secrets in the Ether'. by 

Wilhellr1 F. Flicke has been published. Copies are being distributed through 

the ,AG.,, 

5. BE@SUARTERS CCMIANDANT 

Requested tb-:.t Ch1!1!f's of Offices and Staff' Divisions Who are 

plar1!1ing trips to Baltimore, Fort Meade, and Vint Hill Farms coordinate 

such trips for loeal transportation with 3qC, Ext. 423, at. least three 

days in advance.. Every ef'rort is being made to schedule transportation 

so ':;hat more t:::ansporta.tion Will be made available Vb.en needed. 

CONFIDEt~TtAL 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 05-28-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

DD FOUi 9 6 ~llft\111'9111'1116.. L eCJI' .. lf!\1911 111.\Vill! liEo. 1 PEI ii 
~f_ 

6. NSA-60 

Announced that the Off lee or Collectioo ie comb1nng into one 

divieioo all the units wbiab are ache~ for the Interim. Move. Dete.1.ls 

are being studied Vi.th NSA.70 and -90 as to hoW Collection seX"'Vices Will 

be maintained. during the interilll 1D0Ve. 

M. ,;,c=t@rr~ Asst. to the C/S 

2 

CONFIDENTI1A1L
February 28, 2014 

Mr. Douglass Chouinard 

Swift Air, LLC 

2710 East Old Tower Road 

Phoenix, AZ 85034 

Dear Mr. Chouinard: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§§ 61.157(a); item I (b) of appendix A to part 61; § 121.424(a), (b), and (d)(1); item I (a) of 

appendix E to part 121; and item I (b) of appendix F of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your request and tells you what you should do 

in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your February 19, 2014, exemption request for Swift Air, LLC (Swift Air) into 

the public docket (No. FAA-2014-0103), but we are unable to process your request any 

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy 

enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would 

provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an 

exemption. 

 Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

 Send the information about your particular situation, and the information we requested 

earlier in this letter that will enable us to process your request, to reach us within 30 days. 

We will consider the docket on your request open for that period. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without telling you 

further. 

If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Thuy H. Cooper 

Manager, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 14, 2007

Before

Hon. RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JAMES T. SULLIVAN, not ] Appeals from the United

individually, but as a Trustee ] States District Court for

of the Technical Engineering ] the Northern District of

Division Pension Fund, Local 130 ] Illinois, Eastern Division.

U.A., The Technical Engineering ] 

Division Welfare Fund, Local 130, ] No. 04 C 2736

U.A. and Trust Fund for Education, ] 

Technical Engineering Division ] Samuel Der-Yeghiayan,

Local 130, U.A., LOCAL 130 ] Judge.

TECHNICAL ENGINEERING DIVISION ] 

INDUSTRY FUND, U.A., CHICAGOLAND ] 

CONSTRUCTION SAFETY COUNCIL et al., ] 

 Plaintiffs-Appellants, ] 

 ] 

Nos. 06-1581 and 06-2994 v. ] 

 ] 

WILLIAM A. RANDOLPH, INC., ] 

 Defendant-Appellee. ] 

Upon consideration of the APPELLANT’S MOTION TO CORRECT

OPINION DATED OCTOBER 5, 2007, filed on December 7, 2007, by counsel for the

appellants,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The following sentence on

page 7 of the slip opinion:

ERISA authorizes the award of reasonable attorney’s fee to the

prevailing party. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2).

shall be AMENDED to read:

ERISA authorizes the award of reasonable attorney’s fee to the

prevailing party. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(1).
Exhibit 12(a)

                             XEROX CREDIT CORPORATION
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   (In Millions)

                         Nine Months Ended
                           September 30,         Year Ended December 31,

                            2000   1999    1999  1998  1997  1996  1995

Income before income taxes $ 104  $ 149  $  180 $ 137 $ 123 $ 123 $ 119

Fixed Charges:
   Interest expense
     Xerox debt               12     25      32    23     3     5     6
     Other debt              199    161     211   217   214   199   213
       Total fixed charges   211    186     243   240   217   204   219

Earnings available for
  fixed charges            $ 315  $ 335   $ 423 $ 377 $ 340 $ 327 $ 338

Ratio of earnings to
  fixed charges (1)         1.49   1.80    1.74  1.57  1.57  1.60  1.54


(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed by dividing
     total earnings available for fixed charges by total fixed charges.
-~~-----------~~~!11!!1!1!~-------- --- REF ID :_A65 7 7 9 __ ~ _ ___ ___ _ __ 

tlr. A. A. ilbort 

&ekart lJall 

Uidveralicy' ot Chi~ 

Chi C8gO 37 I Il li DOiS 

lJlmo Dr.. ilbert a 

~ 10'l verr lll!1Ch tor 7o.rt ~ or l~ Apru .. We U'1 1W:ry glad to kxa." that JOU vUl. be able to attend 

ti. metU:r.se ot t.he ~tiee Pcu:ael an 20-21 ~ 1954 .. ~ ~ bu 'been taken tJt r'O'tl" de.Gire• u ~ the 

tMtbod. ot travol. 

You 1¢'0bably knov tlat n:r. x.1'bl.er i. au.t or the 

eountey on w.ce.U.on. Be i4 due 'back on lB May' u4 ~oro I feel that I &Jll ~ in. tentative~ ae ... ~tng w ha 'beWlt yovr ff1:7 rdeo inrltattoo to lwcbfon 

oa. Sa:turdn:y, 2';1 Ma¥, «t the lla.t1aM.l ~ttr· I, too., 

aece;pi vith ~ tbaJ')ka. 

cc: NJ 

c/s 

s/MS'r (Mr. Fried.mm) 

M/R: Acknowledging Dr. A1bert •a acceptance to attend 

Mr.\tbemtics Panel m!etings 20-21 May. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.2
                                                                     -----------

                          TOMMY HILFIGER CORPORATION

                    CERTIFIED TRUE EXTRACT OF A RESOLUTION
                  OF THE DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY ADOPTED ON
                                3/rd/ JUNE, 1999


              ...................................................


Amendment to the Memorandum of Association
------------------------------------------

IT WAS RESOLVED THAT:

"pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the Company's Memorandum of Association (the
"Memorandum") and Paragraph 46 of the Company's Articles of Association (the
"Articles"), Paragraph 6 of the Memorandum be, and hereby is, amended to
increase the authorized capital of the Company from $800,000.00 to
$1,550,000.00; and further

RESOLVED, that pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the Memorandum and Paragraph 46 of
the Articles, Paragraph 7 of the Memorandum be, and hereby is, amended to
increase the number of authorized shares of Ordinary Shares (par value $0.01 per
share) from 75,000,000 to 150,000,000."

Dated this 4/th/ day of June, 1999.


 /s/ Sharon Sinclair Douglas
 ----------------------------------
 HWR Services Limited
 Registered Agent