alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
·• 

l Bovanber • 19 27. 

REF ID:A663BB 

Oonnan4er H. D• Hinelt1q1 

u. s. Ooaet Ouar41 

SUperllltendent Coe.et GU&l'd Academ;r, 

Jfa London• CQml• 

~a coinc14onoo I todaq lea.med that ltB,Jor 

l':ried.mn.1 crn<tealjilt 1n the off ice of tl~ Chiot Signal Off!od • 

1Uar ~nt, baa e.coepted ;rour !nvltatlon to lecture tha cadets am 

omctn of the CO&Bt OUar4 1n New London. on the aubJect ot "Cryptography", 

amt bas designated 16 December. 1927 as the date on which 11; will be 

most convenient tor him to apeak. 

"CJ-Jp'togr•_,~Fand "Codee and Sipl.a" being 

p-.aottcall,y 

~ 

one a.nd the .-am• thing• it woald apptBl' that both lfAJor 

am\ m:aelf' ban been inv1tea. to leoture on the same aubJect,ami 

that I have been as.signed the date, l& Deocr.oJ>er 192'1, most desired bT 

hhl. 

InNmmoh u nt.Jor Friedman is the leedbig AmG'rlcan 

authort't7 cm. the n.bJeci ot codes, clphen and eignala, an4 1a f'ar more 

competent than am I, a rank amateu%'1 to dieouea this h1gh17 interesting 

subJaoia, I am going to aak tbat 70u permit me to witbdmw rq acceptance 

of '1'0Q.r kind invitation &124 that 1011 aaste;a m:r date, 16 December 192'1 

to !fa.Jor Fr:lecSmaa. 

pproved for Release 

y NSA on 11-22-2013 

pursuant to E.O. 

13526
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 29, 2014

d0721 

# Order

Clerk July 29, 2014

148540(93)

IDA TOWNSHIP,

Plaintiff/Counter

- Defendant

- Appellee,

v SC: 148540

COA: 303595

Monroe CC: 09

- 027194

- CZ

SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN MOTORSPORTS,

LLC, DARRIN FELKEY, and CHARLES

MUDGE,

Defendants/Counter

- Plaintiffs

- Appellants,

and

IDA TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION,

Counter

- Defendant

- Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s April 28,

2014 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was

entered erroneously.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             NOV-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                          23,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               10,466,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  6,903,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,705,000
<PP&E>                                       3,388,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              28,394,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       13,882,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       238,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,316,000
<SALES>                                     21,760,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            21,760,000
<CGS>                                       14,975,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,925,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             266,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (406,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    14,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (420,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (420,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.2

                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
reports included in this Form 10-K into the Company's previously filed
Registration Statement File No.'s 333-54042, 333-45732, 333-39860, 333-36640,
333-36618, 33-50860, 33-50862, 33-50864, 33-57734, 33-78804, 33-92312, 33-95288,
333-22631, 333-26857, 333-28745, 333-28675,333-40671, 333-46259, 333-78553,
333-78551, 333-60764, 333-53705 and 333-53707.

                                                  /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 28, 2002
Exhibit 12

<TABLE>
Fleming Companies, Inc.
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<CAPTION>
                                             28 Weeks Ended
                                        July 11,        July 12,
(In thousands of dollars)                 1998            1997
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                     <C>             <C>
Earnings:
Pretax income                           $ 55,065        $ 38,467
Fixed charges, net                       107,995         105,720
                                        --------        --------
Total earnings                          $163,060        $144,187
                                        ========        ========
Fixed charges:
Interest expense                        $ 87,063        $ 85,045
Portion of rental charges
 deemed to be interest                    20,702          20,477
Capitalized interest                           -               -
                                        --------        --------
Total fixed charges                     $107,765        $105,522
                                        ========        ========
Ratio of earnings
 to fixed charges                           1.51            1.37
</TABLE>

"Earnings" consists of income before income taxes and fixed charges excluding
capitalized interest.  Capitalized interest amortized during the respective
periods is added back to earnings.

"Fixed charges, net" consists of interest expense, an estimated amount of
rental expense which is deemed to be representative of the interest factor and
amortization of capitalized interest.

The pro forma ratio of earnings to fixed charges is omitted as it is not
applicable.

<PAGE>
STATE OF MAINE 

• 

D E PARTME N T OF ENVIRONME N T AL PROTECTION 

PAUL R. LEPAGE 

GOVERNOR 

February 4, 2014 

Mr. H. Curtis Spalding 

Regional Administrator 

EPA New England, Region 1 

5 Post Office Square 

Mailcode: ORA 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Re: Direct Final Notice of Deletion of O'Connor Superfund Site, Augusta, Maine 

Dear Regional Administrator Spalding: 

PATRICIA W . AHO 

COMMISSIONER 

The Maine Department of Environmental Protection (MEDEP) reviewed the U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency's (EPA) direct final Notice of Deletion for the O'Connor Superfund Site (Site) which 

proposes to delete the site from the National Priorities List (NPL). Pursuant to §300.425(e)(1) of the 

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP}, the MEDEP concurs with the 

proposed delisting of the O'Connor Superfund Site located in Augusta, Maine. 

As documented in the Notice of Intent to Delete, the Site proposed for deletion from the NCP meets the 

criteria specified in the Record of Decision (ROD) finalized by EPA on September 27, 1989, and as 

modified by the Explanation of Significant Difference dated July 11, 1994, and the ROD Amendment 

dated September 26, 2002. However, if warranted by changes in site conditions, per §300.425 (e)(3) of 

the NCP, the delisted portion of the Site is eligible for future Fund-financed remedial actions. 

q~Commissioner ~ 

cc: Melanie Loyzim, MEDEP, Director, BRWM 

David Wright, MEDEP, Director, Division of Remediation 

Claudia Sait, MEDEP, Project Manager 

Terry Connelly, USEPA, Project Manager 

AUGUSTA 

17 STATE IIOUSF. STATION 

AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0017 

(207) 287-7688 FAX: (207) 287-7826 

web sue: www.maine.gov/dep 

BANGOR 

106 HOGAN ROAD, SU ITE 6 

BANGOR, MAIN E 04401 

(207) 94 I-4570 FAX: (207) 941 -4584 

PORT LAND 

3 I2 CANCO RO AD 

PORT LAND, MA INE 04I 03 

(207) 822-6300 FAX: (207) 822-6303 

PRESQUE ISLE 

1235 CENTRAL DRIVE, SKYWAY PAR K 

PRESQUE ISLE, MA INE 04769 

(207) 764-0477 FAX: (207) 760-3143
-----=---~-----=-=-=:-:--------====-~:i:r. A'TO 1332 

-· ~ 

1. Government time and materials and the aid or other 

Government eaployees were utilized. in the development or Mro 

Friedman's in'Yentions. 

2. Although the exact titles of Mr. Friedman's positions 

varied from time to time, it is f'air to say that all of' his 

inventions concerned in this aatter were directly related to 

his Federal employment • 

.3. Since the inventions were made during the period from 

about 19.3.3 to 1942, when lh"o Friedman was a civilian employee 

in the Office of the Chief Signal Officer, document&r1 evidence 

in the nature or laborator;y records, conference notes, and the 

like, if' still available, should be aaong th;e files or that 

Office, notwithstanding the files covering the applications for 

patent are in the custody of the National Security Agency. The 

official findings or the Signal Corps relative to the relations 

between Mr. Friedman's emplo)"Dlent and his several inventions 

are to be .found in the Signal Corps Patent Board minutes~ copies 

o.f which you haveo The findings (with the original evidence to 

the extent that it could be f'ound) have been reviewed on several 

occas~ by the Signal Corps and by your Of'f'ice and have :never 

been ( ZS:~ @'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-21-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
-' 

4o It is suggested that the Bureau of the Budget Jl&Y haire 

acted under a misapprehension in raising the questions at all 

since the language thereof relate them to Executive Order 10096 

which by its terms covers only inventions made af'ter 23 January 

1950; furthermore, H. R. 5728 does not present Mro Friedman as a . claimant in the usual sense but rather as a petitionero
'II --

1)1 

REF ID:A44601 

e SECRET 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

FORI' GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 

Serial: N 4984 

12 DEC.1960 

MJH;mA1DJN JOB DB BUX::unvB SECRmRI, U. S. CCH4UIICATIOE 

Sl!ICURM !OABD 

su:BJECT: Pakista.il Request for ~ Assistance -fa} 

It is requ~sted that the inclosure be c1~uiate4 to the 

Members, USCSB.1 tor information. 

Incl: 

Memo tor Members, 

USCSB (35 c;ys) 

,. 

. 

U?JJ.#1/~ ROBERT P. BALLORAW 

Colonel USAF 

Director, Operational Sertices 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-25-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a . 

SECRET 

\. 

. ..

' < 
. . ... 

cc: m1' c 

AG 

Reading File 

OPS 

. PROD-03 

CSEC-011 

CSEC 

CSEC-o4 

OOC-03 Bubj 

OOC-03 bQ' 

REF ID:A44601 

• 

Serial: N 4984 

M/R: Self-explamtory. Discussed with Mrs. J. Bi-ewer, PROD-031 and 

Mr. G. Pralle,y,.CSBC-04. ~ 

CROsborn/'OOC-03/2156/5 Dec &J/cw 

2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code
  (i)
    
    The Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act
of 1934; and(ii)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 4, 2006
    
    /s/ JOHN R. GIBSONJohn R. GibsonChairman of the Board of Directors, President
& Chief Executive Officer
Amendment 2011-1 to Contract Stock / Restricted Units Agt



 Exhibit 10.6 

AMENDMENT 2011-1 TO 
 CONTRACT STOCK / RESTRICTED UNITS AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT 2011-1 TO
CONTRACT STOCK / RESTRICTED UNITS AGREEMENT (this “Amendment 2011-1”), is made as of May 17, 2011, by and between Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Stuart M.
Essig (“Executive”). Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Restricted Units Agreement (as defined below). 

WHEREAS, pursuant to that certain Contract Stock / Restricted Units Agreement, dated as of July 27, 2004, between the Company and
Executive (the “Restricted Units Agreement”), the Company granted the Executive 750,000 shares of contract stock in the form of restricted units (the “Units”) representing the right to receive an equal number of
shares of common stock of the Company, par value $.01 per share (“Common Stock”), on the terms and conditions set forth in the Integra LifeSciences Holdings Corporation Second Amended and Restated 2003 Equity Incentive Plan and the
Restricted Units Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, on October 30, 2006, the Company and Executive entered into Amendment 2006-1 to the
Restricted Units Agreement, and on March 6, 2008, the Company and Executive entered into Amendment 2008-1 to the Restricted Units Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, Section 11 of the Restricted Units Agreement provides that the Restricted Units Agreement may be amended pursuant to a written agreement signed by the Company and the Executive; and

 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Restricted Units Agreement as set forth herein. 

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby
amend the Restricted Units Agreement, as follows: 
 1. Section 4(a) of the Restricted Units Agreement is hereby amended to
delete and replace the phrase “within thirty (30) days following” in its entirety with the phrase “within three (3) business days following.” 
 2. This Amendment 2011-1 shall be and is hereby incorporated in and forms a part of the Restricted Units Agreement. 
 3. All other terms and provisions of the Restricted Units Agreement shall remain unchanged except as specifically modified herein. 
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment 2011-1 as of the day and
year first above written. 
  

			
	INTEGRA LIFESCIENCES HOLDINGS CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	  

	Name:	 	Richard E. Caruso
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Board
	
	EXECUTIVE
	
	  

	Stuart M. Essig



  
 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE 40 WEEKS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-25-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          49,673
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  510,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,001
<INVENTORY>                                    867,145
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,632,121
<PP&E>                                       1,404,824
<DEPRECIATION>                                 681,633
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,349,812
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,080,659
<BONDS>                                      1,304,468
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        99,039
<OTHER-SE>                                     380,801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,349,812
<SALES>                                     11,118,959
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,118,959
<CGS>                                       10,107,717
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,107,150
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                19,380
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,659
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (139,230)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (54,449)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (84,781)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (84,781)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (2.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.19)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1917 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1917

 To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to an entity that receives 
compensation for facilitating the donation of fetal tissue derived from 
                              an abortion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 3, 2015

 Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Kirk, and Ms. Murkowski) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to an entity that receives 
compensation for facilitating the donation of fetal tissue derived from 
                              an abortion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FUNDING.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no 
Federal funds shall be made available to any affiliate, subsidiary, 
successor, or clinic of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, 
Inc., if that affiliate, subsidiary, successor, or clinic receives 
compensation for facilitating the donation of fetal tissue products 
derived from an abortion.
    (b) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this Act shall be construed 
to--
            (1) affect any limitation contained in an appropriations 
        Act relating to abortion; or
            (2) reduce overall Federal funding available in support of 
        women's health.
    (c) Investigation and Report.--Not later than 90 days after the 
date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall conduct an 
investigation, and submit to Congress a report on the findings of such 
investigation, concerning whether or not the Planned Parenthood 
Federation of America, Inc., or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, 
successors, or clinics has engaged in any illegal activity pertaining 
to fetal tissue products.
                                 <all>
```
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 30, 2015

No. 04-14-00742-CR

Andres Solis VIELMA,

Appellant

v.

The State of TexasAppellee/s

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-09-12304-CR

Honorable Bert Richardson, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief has this date been received 

and filed in the above styled and numbered cause. Extension of time to file the Appellant’s brief 

is this date GRANTED. Time is extended to February 23, 2015.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: ____________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE

CLERK OF COURT

cc: Daniel J. Kindred

38th Judicial District Attorney

3102 Avenue G

Hondo, TX 78861

Nancy B. Barohn

Attorney At Law

1202 South Alamo Street

San Antonio, TX 78210
2008 NAAQS Nonattainment Area

Preliminary 

2014 - 2016 

Design Value

Meets 2008 

NAAQS?

2016 

Exceedance 

Days

2014 4th 

Highest Daily 

Maximum

2015 4th 

Highest Daily 

Maximum

2016 4th 

Highest Daily 

Maximum

2016 Critical 

Value

2017 Critical 

Value

Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA 70 Yes 2 67 70 75 91 83

Atlanta, GA 75 Yes 13 73 77 75 78 76

Baltimore, MD 73 Yes 10 67 74 79 87 75

Baton Rouge, LA 72 Yes 3 75 73 68 80 87

Calaveras County, CA 76 No 9 71 81 77 76 70

Chicago-Naperville, IL-IN-WI 77 No 14 76 75 80 77 73

Chico (Butte County), CA 75 Yes 7 74 75 77 79 76

Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 72 Yes 8 70 70 76 88 82

Cleveland-Akron-Lorain, OH 75 Yes 6 75 74 76 79 78

Columbus, OH 71 Yes 3 70 71 72 87 85

Dallas-Fort Worth, TX 80 No 8 77 88 76 63 64

Denver-Boulder-Greeley-Ft. Collins-Loveland, CO 80 No 14 76 81 83 71 64

Dukes County, MA Inc 1 59 68 66 101 94

Greater Connecticut, CT 75 Yes 7 77 75 75 76 78

Houston-Galveston-Brazoria, TX 79 No 12 68 95 74 65 59

Imperial County, CA 76 No 5 78 77 74 73 77

Jamestown, NY 68 Yes 2 66 71 69 91 88

Kern County (Eastern Kern), CA 84 No 27 89 80 84 59 64

Lancaster, PA 69 Yes 2 66 70 71 92 87

Los Angeles-San Bernardino Counties (West Mojave Desert) 91 No 59 93 86 94 49 48

Los Angeles-South Coast Air Basin, CA 108 No 106 102 107 117 19 4

Mariposa County, CA 75 Yes 6 77 71 77 80 80

Morongo Band of Mission Indians, CA 97 No 51 98 97 97 33 34

Nevada County (Western part), CA 84 No 16 82 85 86 61 57

New York-N. New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-CT 85 No 25 81 87 87 60 54

Pechanga Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, CA 77 No 7 77 79 77 72 72

Philadelphia-Wilmington-Atlantic City, PA-NJ-MD-DE 77 No 14 71 82 80 75 66

Phoenix-Mesa, AZ 77 No 9 80 77 74 71 77

Pittsburgh-Beaver Valley, PA 70 Yes 6 68 70 73 90 85

Reading, PA 71 Yes 4 68 71 75 89 82

Riverside County (Coachella Valley), CA 87 No 25 89 86 87 53 55

Sacramento Metro, CA 84 No 32 82 80 92 66 56

San Diego County, CA 81 No 13 80 79 84 69 65

San Francisco Bay Area, CA 74 Yes 8 76 74 72 78 82

San Joaquin Valley, CA 94 No 88 97 93 92 38 43

San Luis Obispo (Eastern San Luis Obispo), CA 73 Yes 2 73 72 74 83 82

Seaford, DE 69 Yes 2 67 70 70 91 88

Sheboygan County, WI 79 No 6 72 81 85 75 62

St. Louis-St. Charles-Farmington, MO-IL 72 Yes 12 72 70 75 86 83

Tuscan Buttes, CA 79 No 23 76 76 87 76 65

Upper Green River Basin Area, WY 63 Yes 0 62 65 64 101 99

Ventura County, CA 77 No 4 81 74 77 73 77

Washington, DC-MD-VA 72 Yes 8 71 73 72 84 83
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

 38.0

 38.5

 39.0

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/09

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 09 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

★ ■ ■

■

■

★

●

●

●

★

● ●

● ●