Joseph Millette

5000 Kyler Rd. Las Cruces, NM 88012
813

- 545

- 6142 uavpilotjoe@me.com

January 21, 2016

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Submission of request for Authorization to Conduct Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations Allowed by Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 Through the Exemption
Process Identified Under 14 CFR Section 11.81

Dear Sir/Madam,

Pursuant to S ection 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, I Joseph Millette as an independent contractor and operator of 3D Robotics Iris+, and Tough Wing sUAS , seeks an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulat ions (“FARs”) listed below and discussed in Appendix A.

Joseph Millette
sUAS Contractor

5000 Kyler Rd. Las Cruces, NM. 88012
813

- 545

- 6142 uavpilotjoe@me.com

## Contents

Description of the UAS

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .. 3
Exemption:

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 3
Safety and risk assessment evaluations:

................................ ................................ ................................ ....... 4

THE APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARD UNDER SECTION 333

................................ ................................ ........... 4

The sUAS

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ....................... 5
Aircraft Performance/Specifications:

................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 5

Iris+

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................ 5
ToughWing Mapper

................................ ................................ ................................ .............................. 5
Operator Requirements:

................................ ................................ ................................ ............................... 7
Mandatory Operating Conditions

................................ ................................ ................................ ................. 7

Public Interest

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 8
Privacy

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 8

Conclusion

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 8

APPENDIX A:

................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ................ 10

EXEMPTION REQUEST AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY SHOWINGS

................................ .................... 10

APPENDIX B: SUMMARY OF JOSEPH MILLETTE, SECTION 333 EXEMPTION REQUEST

................................ 13

## Description of the UAS

1. 3D Robotics Iris+

The 3D Robotics Iris+ is a quad sUAS in a Standard X frame Quad formation.

The 3DR Iris+ features the PixHawk autopilot system with GPS navigati on combined with a proven multi

rotor design. As part of the APM Copter family, the 3DR Iris+ uses the full range of autonomous flight features supported by APM Copter, including loiter, circle, retur n to launch, follow me, acrobatic flying mode, and more. Installation of free mission planning software allows the operator to run programmed way point missions and analyze flight data. R obust fail

- safe features include, Geo

- fencing ; RTL; Low Battery; and Loss Link. 3DR Iris+ is a capable multirotor for tasks such as Aerial Photography, Aerial Videography, Structural inspections, and terrain mapping

.

2. Tough Wing Mapper sUAS

The Tough Wing Mapper is a durable mapping airframe used for terrain mapping of areas up to 1 km 2

. The Tough Wing Mapper utilizes a PixHawk autopilot with GPS guidance. Because the Tough Wing Mapper uses the same autopilot as the Iris+ it too has similar safety fail safe featu res to ensure safe operation in the National Airspace System

.



## Exemption:

The requested exemption would permit commercial operation of 3DR Iris+ and Tough Wing Mapper
UAS , with payload installed, weigh approximately 3 lbs. and 4 lbs. respectively. Both ar e capable of capturing still imagery, video, and other sensors including IR, multi

- spectral, etc.

Remote sensing applications for these two sUAS include mapping, structural inspections, aerial imagery,
and demonstrations. Use of the two sUAS for these purp oses, safely provide high quality data at a fraction of the cost of using conventional aircraft. They can also operate in conditions that conventional
sized aircraft could not accommodate.

Operations under the exemption will be subject to strict operating requirements and conditions to ensure an equivalent level of safety to currently authorized operations using manned aircraft.

The airspace in which the sUAS will operate will occur in FAA approved airspace as designated in the
COA.

## Safety and risk assessment evaluations:

I respectfully submit that these small unmanned aerial systems will be used in lieu of comparatively hazardous operations now conducted with fi xed wing and rotary manned aircraft. The FAA can have confidence that the operations will achieve at least an equivalent or greater level of safety for persons and airspace users . Approval of this exemption would thereby enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation’s (the FAA Administrator’s) responsibilities under Section 333(c) of the Reform Act to “Establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems in the national airspace system.”

The regulations from which the exemption is requested are as follows:

14 C.F. R. 61.113(a) & (b) 14 C.F. R. 91.7 (a)

14 C.F. R. 91.119(c) 14 C.F. R. 91. 121

14 C.F. R. 91. 151(a) (1) 14 C.F. R. 91. 405(a)

14 C.F. R. 91. 407(a) (1) 14 C.F. R. 91. 409(a) (2)

14 C.F. R. 91. 417(a) & (b)



## THE APPLICABLE LEGAL STANDARD UNDER SECTION 333

I submit that granting of this exemption application for use of the sUAS 3DR Iris+ and Tough Wing Mapper for remote sensing with a focus on mapping, aerial imaging, industrial/structural inspections, and demonstrations. This will advance the Congressional m andate in Section 333 of the Reform Act to accelerate the introduction of UASs into the national airspace system (NAS). In making this determination, the Secretary is required to determine which types of UASs do not create a hazard to
users of the NAS or t he public or pose a threat to national security in light of the following:

• The UAS’s size, weight, speed, and operational capability

• Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas

• Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator.

The granting of the requested exemption is in the public interest based on the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act; the additional authority in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surround ing the proposed operations; and the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety and cost savings associated with transitioning to UASs for remote sensing. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that the FAA grant the requested exemptio n without delay.

## The sUAS

The sUAS in this petition will comply with the requirements set forth by Section 333 by its small size, weight, speed, and operational proximity to airports and densely populated areas. As a result under this exemption UAS’ are not deemed airworthy by an airworthiness certificate, but rather they are deemed airworthy by the operator conducting a thorough preflight of the aircraft. These aircraft will also be registered according to 14 CFR Part 47, marked in accordance to 14 CFR P art 45 Subpart C, and accompanied by a letter of alternative marking due to the unconventional design. Markings will be as large as practicable. These aircraft are of the same size, configuration, and operational capabilities of the aircraft granted in exe mptions 11138, 11153, and 11157.


### Aircraft Performance/Specifications: •Ground Control Station (GCS): The aircraft will be primarily controlled through the use of a 2.4 GHz RC transmitter. The aircraft can also be pre

- programmed to conduct a mission through the use of a laptop or tablet via a 915 MHz telemetry link. Whenever operations are conducted in this matter, the RC
Transmitter will be able to take control of the aircraft if the need arises.



### Iris+

• Video Downlink:

o 5.8 GHz at 200mW

• Lost Com:

o Aircraft w ill autonomously return to the launch location and safely land.

• Flight controller :

o Pixhawk

• Emergency Procedure:

o Should the need arise the aircraft can be commanded by a switch on the RC transmitter to safely land immediately or return and land at the laun ch location.

• Power Supply:

o Iris+: 3 S 51 00 mAh 25C Lithium Polymer Battery

• Dimensions:

o Iris+ : 26 in. prop tip to prop tip

• Maximum Speed:

o <44 knots

• Normal operating speed:

o < 30 knots

• Weight with payload:

o Iris+: 3 lb.



### Tough Wing Mapper

 Wingspan:

o 48" (1219 cm)

 Weight

o 3.3 pounds (1.5 kg)

 Weight

- Maximum:

o 4.4 pounds (2kg) Battery:

o 5000 mAh , 4 cell, lithium polymer

 Endurance:

o 45 minutes

 Minimum air speed:

o 13 meters per second

 Recommended automatic landing area:

o 100 ft. x 600 ft.

 Launch method:

o Hand launch

- no catapult required

Aircraft manuals and operations checklist will be included as additional information to this petition for exemption.

## Operator Requirements:

As the sUAS operator will meet or exceed all FAA requirements for UAS operations as listed below.

Minimum of:

• Private pilot’s certificate

• At least a third class medical,

• Aircraft specific flight training as defined below.

• 25 hours as a UAS rotorcraft pilot including,

• 10 hour s logged as a UAS pilot with a multi

- rotor UAS,

• 5 hours with the specific make and model of the UAS, and

• At least 3 take

- offs and landings within the preceding 90 days.


## Mandatory Operating Conditions
Grant of the exemption to Joseph Millette will be subjec t to the following mandatory conditions for flight operations.

• Operations shall not occur over congested, actively, or densely populated areas as defined by the local FSDO.

• Permission from land owner is required before commencing any flight.

• Operations wil l only occur during Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions (VMC).

• Operations will not occur less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the operator.

• The sUAS will r emain clear of manned aircraft and yield right of way.

• A flight test will be conducted after any major repair or alteration.

• A preflight check will be conducted before each flight to assure airworthiness.

• Aircraft will remain within Visual Line of Sight (V LOS) of the operator.

• All operations will be conducted with a Visual Observer (VO).

• Operations will be limited to daylight hours.

• Operations will be concluded with no less than 25% battery power remaining.

• Operations will not exceed 400ft AGL.

• Operations w ill not occur within 5nm of any airport unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s management is obtained.

• Operations will take place under a COA.

• Operator will file a NOTAM for each flight.

• All required permissions and permits will be obtained from territorial, state, county or city jurisdictions, including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies.• All non

- participants will keep 500ft away from operations unless there are adequate barriers to protect them.

• All operation s will be conducted according to the manufacturer’s manuals.

• All documents that will be kept at the GCS include but are not limited to; the aircraft manuals, maintenance logs, aircraft registration, grant of exemption, and COA.



## Public Interest

Consistent w ith the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §11.81(d), Petitioner offers the following reasons why granting this petition for exemption is in the public interest, i.e., how granting it would benefit the public
as a whole.

Approval of this exemption allowing commerci al remote sensing operations of sUAS in mapping, aerial imagery, structural inspections, and demonstration will benefit the public as a whole in the following

ways:

• It helps fulfill Congress' goal in passing Section 333(a) through (c) of the Reform Act, na mely, the FAA Administrator's assessment of whether certain UAS may operate safely in the National Airspace System before completion of the rulemaking required under Section 332
of the Reform Act.

• The operation significantly improves safety and reduces ris k by alleviating human exposure to danger associated with current aerial remote sensing methods, namely, full size helicopters. Reducing human exposure to death or serious injury associated with manned aircraft performing these tasks furthers the public’s interest.

• Petitioner's sUAS are battery powered and create no emissions. If Petitioner's sUAS crashes, there is no fuel to ignite and explode. Any impact of Petitioner's lightweight sUAS is far less than a full size manned aircraft. The public's interest i s furthered by minimizing ecological impact of an accident and by reducing human exposure to potentially harmful emissions
associated with manned aircraft.

• Remote sensing is as valuable tool for mapping, structural inspections, aerial imagery, flight
testi ng and training. However, problems with safety, cost, statistical integrity, and logistics continue to impede remote sensing from conventional manned aircraft. The use of sUAS addresses these problems and is a powerful tool for performing a wide

- range of r emote sensing applications. The public as a whole will benefit from the safer and more cost

effective remote sensing services that sUAS operations provide.



## Privacy
All flights will occur over property with the landowner’s prior consent.



## Conclusion

I Joseph Millette, seeks an exemption from the FARs set forth above and in Appendix A to allow commercial operations of a sUAS conducting remote sensing with a focus in research, mapping, aerial imaging, structural inspections, flight testing and R/C training.App roval of this exemption allowing commercial operations of the two sUAS for remote sensing will

enhance safety by reducing risk. Conventional remote sensing operations, using turbine or piston

powered aircraft present risks associated with vehicles that can weigh 5,000 to 7,000 lbs., or more, carry large quantities of fuel, passengers, and, in some cases, cargo. In contrast, these two sUAS weighing less than 6 lbs. and powered by batteries eliminates a portion of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel carried on board. The sUAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose any individuals to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights.

Additionally, no national security issue is raised by the grant of the reques ted exemptions due to all pilots being certified through the FAA.

The operation of the two sUAS weighing less than 6 lbs., for remote sensing in accordance with the strict conditions outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein.

These sUAS provide satisfaction of the criteria set forth in Section 333 of the Reform Act

— size, weight, speed, operating capabilities, lack of proximity to airports and populated areas, operation within visual
li ne of sight, and national security

— and its showing of an equivalent level of safety provides more than adequate justification for the grant of the requested exemptions allowing commercial operation of the two sUAS in the remote sensing business.

## APPENDIX A:

EXEMPTION REQUEST AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY SHOWINGS

UNDER APPLICABLE RULES SUBJECT TO EXEMPTION

I, Joseph Millette, request an exemption from the following regulations, all of which have been granted by every approved Section 333 exemption at the time of this submission.

14 C.F.R. § 61.113 Private pilot privileges and limitations: Pilot in command.

The regulation provides that no person that holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in command of an aircraft for compensation or hire. Subp aragraph (b) allows a private pilot to act as pilot in command of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if: (1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; and (2)

The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

Equivalent Level of Safety

Currently, there are no applicable areas identified for sUAS in either the private or commercial sector and therefore an exemption is required to conduct commercial operations. As flight operations will be conducted in a restricted environment as described in the operations section, these strict guidelines will achieve an equivalent level of safety for each individual flight especially when compared to commercial flights identified in Part 61 when originally developed.

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil Aircraft Airworthiness

Petitioner seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a), which requires that a civil aircraft be in airworthy condition to be operated. Inasmuch there will be no airworthiness certificate issued for the sUAS, should this exemption be granted, no FAA regulatory standard will exist for determining
airworthiness.

Equivalent Level of Safety

Given the size of the IRIS+ & TOUGHWING MAPPER and the preflight procedures including the review of
maintenance logs and preflight check lists, an equivalent level of safety will be provided to assure the aircraft is in an airworthy condition.

14 C.F.R. § 91.119(c): Minimum Safe Altitudes

Petitioner requests an exemption from the minimum safe altitude requirements o f 14

C.F.R. § 91.119(c) which states that aircraft may not operate closer than 500 feet above the surface and away from any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure in non

- congested areas.

To provide the intended operations, the sUAS is operated below 400 fee t AGL.

Equivalent Level of Safety

Compared to flight operations with rotorcraft weighing far more than the 6 pounds proposed herein, and given the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those thatpresently exist with conventional aircraft. An equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size,

weight, and speed of the UAS, as well as the location where it is operated. As set forth in the operations section of this exemption, the sUAS will be operated away from densely populated areas and at least 5nm away from airports (unless a letter of agreement from the airport’s management is obtained), where buildings and people will not be exposed to operations without their pre

- obtained consent.
Because of the adva nce notice to the property owners and participants, all affected individuals will be well aware of the planned flight operations.

14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings

This petition seeks an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.121, which requires a person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude or flight level by reference to an altimeter that is set to the elevation of the departure airport or barometric pressure. An exemption is required because the sUAS uses AGL from
take of location and not MSL altitude.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by the operator confirming the altitude of the launch site shown on the altitude indicator before flight. Moreover, the PIC will use the barometric altitude AGL
indicat or to constantly monitor the sUAS height, thus ensuring operation at safe altitudes.

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a) (1): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

Petitioner requests an exemption from 14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a) (1)'s fuel requirements for flight in VFR conditions during the day. Section 91.151(a) (1) states:

(a) No person may begin a flight in an airplane under VFR conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first point of intended landing and, assuming normal cruising speed

–
(1) During the day, to fly after that for at least 30 minutes;

Here, the battery powering the UAS provides approximately 12 minutes of flight. To meet the 30 minutes reserve requirement in 14 C.F.R. § 91.151, sUAS flights could not be conducted. Given the limitations on the sUAS proposed flight area and the location of its proposed operations within a predetermined area, a safety margin based on a reserve amount of battery life is needed.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the operations will be conducted on

- site without significant transit time by the sUAS. All flights will be planned to be terminated with no less than 25% reserve battery power still available. This res triction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS safely to the ground and its planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area even in the event of an unexpected occurrence. Operation of the sUAS with less than 30 minutes of reserve fuel does not include the type of risks that Section 91.151(a)(1) was intended to alleviate given the size and speed of the small UAS, and the proximity of the flight operation to the landing zone.14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a), 91.407(a) (1), 91.409(a) (2); 91.41 7(a) and (b): Maintenance Inspections

Petitioner also seeks an exemption from the maintenance inspection requirements contained in 14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a), 91.407(a) (1), 91.409(a) (2); 91.417(a) and (b). These regulations specify maintenance and inspection standards in reference to 14 C.F.R. Part

43. See, e.g., 14 C.F.R. § 91.405(a) (stating that each owner or operator of an aircraft "[s]hall have the aircraft inspected as prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections ...have
disc repancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter"). An exemption to these regulations is needed because Part 43 and these sections only apply to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, which
the sUAS will not have.

Equivalent Level of Safety

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the operator will ensure that the sUAS is in working order prior to initiating flight by following the preflight checklist, perform required maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. T he operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition.

## APPENDIX B: SUMMARY OF JOSEPH MILLETTE, SECTION 333 EXEMPTION

REQUEST

I, Joseph Millette, hereby provides pursuant to Part 11 a summary of its exemption application to allow commercial operation of the 3D Robotics Iris+ and Tough Wing Mapper unmanned aircraft in remote sensing. An exemption is requested from the following regulations:

14 C.F. R. 61.113(a) & (b);
14 C.F. R. 91.7 (a); 14 C.F. R. 91.119(c); 14 C.F. R. 91. 121; 14 C.F. R. 91. 151(a) (1); 14 C.F. R. 91. 405(a); 14 C.F. R. 91. 407(a) (1); 14 C.F. R. 91. 409(a) (2); 14 C.F. R. 91. 417(a) & (b).