alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ex1012.htm


    Exhibit
10.12

     

    
 

    PROMISSORY
NOTE

     

     

    
      	$178,162.65	
              January 1,
      2007

            
	 	
              Salt Lake City,
      Utah

            


    

     

    On or before December 31, 2007 (the
“Due Date”), the undersigned, Sequoia Media Group, LC, a Utah limited liability
company (“Payor”), promises to pay to the order of Chett B. Paulsen, or assigns
(“Payee”), in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately
available funds, the principal sum of $178,162.65 together with all accrued and
outstanding interest as set forth herein, plus a loan origination fee equal to
7% or 12,471.39.  This Promissory Note (“Note”) is issued in exchange
for documented advances made by the Payee for and on behalf of the Payor during
the formation stages of Payor.

    


    This Note shall bear simple interest at
the rate of 10% per annum which shall accrue and become due and payable with the
principal, unless expressly waived by Payee in writing.  All or any
portion of the principal and interest due hereunder of may be repaid at any time
without penalty prior to maturity.

    


    In the event of default under this
Note, Payee shall be entitled to collect a reasonable attorneys' fee from the
Payor, as well as other costs, charges, and expenses reasonably incurred, in
curing any default or attempting collection of the payment due on this Note,
whether or not litigation or any proceeding to enforce this Note is
commenced.

    


    If any term or provision of this Note,
or any portion of any such term or provision, shall be held invalid or against
public policy, or if the application of the same to any person or circumstance
is held invalid or against public policy, then, the remainder of this Note (or
the remainder of such term or provision) and the application thereof to other
persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby and shall remain valid
and in full force and effect to the fullest extent permitted by
law.

    


    This Note shall be governed by and
construed solely in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah.

    


     

    
      
        	 	 	“Payor”	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Sequoia
      Media Group, LC	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 
	
                 

              	
                 

              	/s/ 	 
	 	 	Edward
      B. Paulsen	 
	 	 	Secretary/Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TVI Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harley A. Hughes, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Harley A. Hughes                 
|                       |  |  |  | Harley A. Hughes                     
|                       |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



34
Exhibit 32

Certification Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)


Persuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) the
undersigned General Partners of TASA Products Limited, a Washington limited
partnership (the "Company"), do hereby certify, to the best of such General
Partner's knowledge and belief, that:

1. The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 (the
"Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/MICHEL E. MAES
Michel E. Maes
Managing General Partner
Date: 5-4-07
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

155) ll-K-(B)-154 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:53 AM Sheet 155 of 325 
P.2 

«:-v *• 

ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS, INC. 

1655 NORTH FORT MYER DRIVE ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22209 703/528-1900 

October 29, 1984 

A-83-27 

II-K-CB)-154 

L 

Mr. Robert Short 

Economic Analysis Branch 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Drop-12 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Subject: EPA Contract No. 68-02-3564, Work Assignment #19 

Dear Robert: 

Attached is a summary of total projected solid waste and liquid 

discharge disposal requirements in 1990. Estimates are included for two 

sets of projected industrial fuel prices: Reference Case and Higher Oil 

and Gas.Prices. These estimates have been derived from 14 IFCAM runs 

(made between July and October 1984). 

Sincerely, 

Tim Hogan 

TH/ce 

Enclosure 

cc: Dr. A. Wehe 

MANAGEMENT / ECONOMICS / ENGINEERING 
1990 IFCAM PROJECTIONS' 

Scenarios 

Regulatory Baseline 

Option Case 1 

Option Case 2 

Option Case 3 

Option Case 4 

Option Case 5 

Option Case 6 

cas 

107 

73 

76 

42 

72 

127 

127 

Solid waste 

(IO3 short tons) 

Reference Higher oil and 

gas prices 

Liquid discharge 

3 

(10 cubic meters) 

Reference Higher oil and 

case gas prices 

1,354 

1,225 

1,153 

773 

751 

773 

718 

811 

732 

1,154 

1,262 

3,206 

4,205 

4,944 

667 

699 

826 

5,584 

5,719 

6,080 

6,062 

New industrial fossil fuel-fired boilers installed after 1985 which are larger than 100 MMBtu/hr. 

includes bottom ash from coal boilers and fly ash collected by particulate matter emissions control equipment. 

"Sodium throwaway FGD waste. 

•j 

Correspond to scenarios summarized in Tables 1 and 2 of a letter from T. Hogan to R. Short dated October 19, 

1984.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                      2,159,434
<SECURITIES>                                   54,460
<RECEIVABLES>                               7,475,772
<ALLOWANCES>                                  820,425
<INVENTORY>                                 6,805,492
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           19,227,963
<PP&E>                                      5,174,637
<DEPRECIATION>                              3,773,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             21,949,808
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      13,571,572
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                       57,825
<OTHER-SE>                                  8,378,236
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               21,731,683
<SALES>                                    38,731,683
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           38,731,683
<CGS>                                      32,361,928
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              32,361,928
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            5,263,936
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          1,014,677
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               169,608
<INCOME-TAX>                                (300,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           469,608
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  469,608
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .09



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 3.1
                                                                     -----------



                        CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO THE
                        CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF
                                   CPAC, INC.

               UNDER SECTION 805 OF THE BUSINESS CORPORATION LAW


    The undersigned being the President and Secretary of CPAC, Inc., do hereby
certify and set forth:

    1.   The name of the Corporation is CPAC, Inc.  The name under which the
Corporation was originally formed is Computerized Pollution Abatement
Corporation.

    2.   The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation was filed by the
Department of State on March 27, 1969.

    3.  The Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to effect an
increase in the aggregate number of shares the Corporation has the authority to
issue.  Article 7 of the Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to add
an additional five million (5,000,000) shares of common stock at $.01 par value
to the existing five million (5,000,000) shares of common stock at $.01 par
value.

           To effect these changes, Article 7 of the Corporation's
Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended to read as follows:

           "7.  The aggregate number of shares which this Corporation shall
           have authority to issue is ten million (10,000,000) common shares,
           $.01 par value."

    4.   This amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation was authorized by
the unanimous vote of the Board of Directors followed by the affirmative vote of
the holders of a majority of all issued and outstanding shares entitled to vote
thereon at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders duly called and held on 
August 9, 1995, a quorum being present.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate this
17th day of August, 1995, and affirm under penalties of perjury that the
foregoing statements are true and complete.

                                       /s/ Thomas N. Hendrickson
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Thomas N. Hendrickson, President


                                       /s/ Robert Oppenheimer
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Robert Oppenheimer, Secretary
# CE2004078EN.01092201.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/922 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/922

---

(2004/C 78 E/0975)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0058/04

by Giuseppe Di Lello Finuoli (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(12 January 2004)

Subject:   Funding by the Italian State and the Region of Campania for the programme contract submitted by Agrifuturo S.c.a.r.l.

Subject:

With reference to the questioner's numerous previous questions on the subject, none of which has received a proper answer, the Commission has now had more than a year to examine the documents concerning the programme agreement with Agrifuturo. It is hard to believe that it has been impossible to decipher these documents after such a long time and, on the basis of this examination, to take some decision which could be communicated to the questioner before the end of the parliamentary term. Can the Commission please give a swift and comprehensive answer regarding the compatibility of the programme with point 4.9 of the 2000-2006 regional operational programme for Campania?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(30 January 2004)

(30 January 2004)

We have not had the documents on financing of the programme contract with Agrofuturo S.c.a.r.l. for more than a year. The Italian authorities sent them to us through the Permanent Representation under cover of a letter dated 15 May 2003.

On the basis of the information transmitted the Agrofuturo dossier has been transferred to the register of unnotified (illegal) aids.

A new request for information is at present in preparation.

We can assure the Honourable Member that a decision, whatever it turns out to be, will be adopted as soon as possible after the Italian authorities' reply is received.

It should be remembered that under Article 13(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 (now Article 88) of the EC Treaty (1) in cases of possible unlawful State aid the Commission is not bound by the normal two month time limit for examination of the case.

1

---

(1)  OJ L 83, 27.3.1999.

1

---
TRAVEL ORDERS REQUEST 

To: COMP • 

REF ID:A649BB 

t, REQUEST TRAVEL ORDERS TO PROCEED ON TEMPORARY DUTY BE ISSUED 'T'o: •• TO 

Rl!:TUAN WITH "OLLOWINO DEVIATIONS IN ITINltAA.AYI 

ll. l!:XPLANATION AND PURPOSI! OF TNIP1 luee re-rerae """e""""'") 

(middle} 

rruNC. ON PNO.J. AND TASK NOi 

ll. TRIP HAS BEl!:N COOADINATltO WITH THIE "OLLOWINO •TAFI" DIVISIONS ANO Ol"FICIES1 

4. CONT ACT l"'OR ADDITIONAL DltTAILI ON TR A VIEL OUTllOlt CONTINENTAL u.s • 

•• REQUEST l"OR TRAVEL ev ur eV TPA1 

D COMMERCIAL AIR D RAIL D TPA 

Av1DU.t.L oe.rEcT• To TRAVEL sv AIR 

DOWN CAk WfTH ____ PASS. IN TRAVEL STATUS. D PASSENGER 

TDY INVOLVES ATTENDANCE AT CONll'ERIENCIES OR CONVKNTIONS 

• ___ .D_ YES NO ES D NO 

llA.. THE FOt..LOWIHG AU' HO TIONll ARE A1Equ1E•T1to1 

D NO E"XPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT D TRAVEL AT NO EXPENSE TO THE GOVERNMENT D RAIL DIRECTED 

GOV. TRANS. DIRECTED IF D PER DIEM AT~ D TPA IS MORE ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE GOV. D AVAIL.ABLE 

O ORDERS TO BE PREPARED IN ACCOROANCE WITH ll_IRECTIVES ON ATTEND, AT coNVf;NTloNs D oi:_HER 

TPA NATE PltR Mil.It TAANSPQRT ATION 

DATE FORWARDED TO COMP o""'CE Otll • .,. ,,.,..,.. DIVISION OP'FICS:N , ....... Ure) 

D FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE 

DATE FORWARDED 

RECEIVED OPFICE CHIEP 01" STAl"F(•l•n•ture) 

D "PPROVEO D DISAPPROVED C]oTHER 

DATE PORWARD&:D CHlll:ll' OP' ST""" (•f(lflature) 

REMARKS 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

NSA FORM Ill REV Ill HOV Ill
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,354
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,879
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     96,873
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               124,402
<PP&E>                                         147,429
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 335,195
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           91,042
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             2
<OTHER-SE>                                     186,057
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   335,195
<SALES>                                        749,789
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               749,789
<CGS>                                          553,566
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  553,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               212,360
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,530
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (18,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,486)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,181)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,181)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.64)
        

</TABLE>
ii5:: --

~ 

--

-·-

~ 

~-: 

~ 

_ ~ ... ~ .. ~ ;;. _ t4 ·~1--~1::':r.,.. ~ - -- ~ .. ~ ~'!i.'~ff!'rl. .. : --_ .,.--~~-~-: -~--- ...... ~-7._-:-rf_- ~ -,w -"Vff" *!"> 

.,_ ·-:~ . RE~:. fb: A68297 . -- ,{"- ---- ~ ~- -- . - -... -,,.___.,. ~ 

,- 'i:--~=--~-zM~~:~~'!'.;;:;; x"4; {ELW-~~_, - __..:... __.c;-

,•':. 

Sd!alt 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Ir· ,Johft g. llward 

~Mr. Bwudi 

Tha.U you for Hndi!ti me tho ~-~c~~ :J of a papel" 

• i4vlsor,y boards,, am balievo it vill be 't'ftl"1 ...Cul 1n 

VattJ.n,; • lld.:1111.on and charter tor a •v sCAQ. 

IAT_,Pfl J • CA!fDlE 

a.Jor OGl:loN1 us Ar:q 

Diraotox-, Anied Forces Securiv Agma:y 

w.F .Fr.l.edman/ebJ-/l2 Juno 52 

Consul. t:mt; 

selt-e:xplana. t.or.r - repl1.y to ltr :f'ran l'.r. Howard 

to DirAF:..A dtd 2 June 52.
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 29, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 04-50730

_____________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 Plaintiff - Appellee

 v.

RICHARD AARON FIELDS

 Defendant - Appellant

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Western District of Texas

(04-CR-86)

---------------------

Before JONES, BARKSDALE, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

IT IS ORDERED that Appellee’s motion to vacate the sentence

is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s motion to remand the

case to the Western District of Texas, Waco Division for

resentencing is granted.

________________

* Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.

47.5.4.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee’s alternative request

for an extension of time to file the Appellee’s brief 14 days

from the denial of Appellee’s motion to vacate and remand is

denied as moot.
REF ID:A66584 

~ HEADQUARTER& 

UNITED STATES AIR F'DRCE SECURITY SERVICE 

BRDDKB AIR F"DRCE BABE, TEXAS 

Kr. William F. Friedman 

Armed Forces Securit~ Agency 

3801 Bebraska Avenue, N.W., 

Washington 25, D. C. 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

27 March 1951 

I want to take this opportunity to extend my warm appreciation 

for the interesting and enlightening lectures which you gave to ffI¥ 

Opera ti ans people on the 14th am 15th of this lmnth. 

As you well know, there frequently is a nDrale problem with 

people in our business who work in a restricted an~ confined 

envi.i:·onment and are not fully aware of the "tean" cir which they 

are a part, nor or the importance and potential ot their business. 

Your talks have been or immeasurable T/alUe in relieving this 

situation. 

I hope we may have the opportunity to hear your talks again 

in the not too distant f\lture, possibly sane time next autU!!!ll. 

Again, let me extend my sincere thanks for your ti::ie am 

efforts. 

Sincerely' yours, 

ORVILLE LAIRD 

Colonel, USAF 

Director ot Operations 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
NO. 07-07 -042 8-CV IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL B OC TOBER19, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ In re ROCKY W ADE SMIT H, Rel ator

_________

_________

_________

____ On Original

Procee ding For W

rit Of M andamus

_________

_________

_________

____ Bef ore QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ. Pendi ng before thi s c our t i s t he a ppl ic ati on of R ocky W ade Smi th for

a w ri t of
ma nda mu s. He req uest s thatw e orde r th e “Cottle Coun ty District Court Jud ge to perform hi s mi ni s te r i al d ut i es . . . and cr ed i t [ hi m] w i th al l ti me se r v ed ag ai ns t hi s se nt en c e for t i me spen t in custod y

und er said cau se, . . . .” W e de ny the a pplicat ion for the rea sons which follo w . First, rules of

proced ure ob lig ate one seeking ma nda mu s relief to accom pan y

his peti ti on w it h an appen d ix

. T EX . R. A PP . P. 5 2.3( j)

. The la tter

musti ncl ude, among othe r things, a certif ied or sw orn cop y of the do cum entsh owi ng th e ma tter com plaine d of . In this
cas e, t he doc ument s how ing the matter co mplai ned of w oul d be Smit h’s req uestto the t ri al court askin g for jail credit while h is ch arge w as pe ndin g. No such do cum entapp ears in2

Sm it h ’s a p p e n d ix. An d , t h a t S m it h m a y be ac ti n g pro se does not re li ev e hi m of compl y ing
w it h the r ule s o f proc edur e. Holt v. F.F. Ente rs. , 990 S.W .2d 756 , 759 (Tex. App. –Am arillo 199 8, pe t. de nied ). Seco nd, n othi ng of re cord i ndi cat es that Smit h’s r eq uest for c re ditfor t ime ser v ed dur ing the pendency o f h is case w as ev er

broug ht t o the att enti on of the dis tr ic t c our t. Simp ly put, before m and am us relief ma y issue, the petitione r mu st esta blish tha t the district
cour t 1) had a l eg al duty to per form a non- dis creti onar y act , 2) w as ask ed to per form the act , and 3) fail ed or

r efused to do i t. O’Conn or v. Fir st Court of Ap pea ls , 837 S.W .2d 9 4, 97 ( Tex . 199 2) ; In re Chavez , 6 2 S. W .3 d 22 5 , 2 2 8 (T e x. Ap p .–Am a rill o 20 0 1 , o rig. proce edin g) . Giv en th is, it is encu mb entu pon Smith to illustrate th at th e district court
re cei v ed and w as aw ar e of hi s req uest

. This is so becaus e a cour t cannot be fault ed for doi ng noth ing w hen i t i s o r w as unaw ar e of the need t o ac t. H er e, t he record fail s t o s how that Smit h had made a re q uestto the tr ial courtreg ardin g this jail time cre dit . W hether the tr ial cour t w as ev er made aw ar e of i t is unkno w n. Lack ing that infor mati on, we ca n n ot
s i mp l y a s s u me t h a t t h e d i s t r i c t c o u rt k n e w o f i t s s u p p o s e d d u t y t o a c t a n d n e g l e c t e d to per form it

. Thus, Smit h has not fulfill ed his burden to il lus trate that the t ri al cour t refused to ac t. Accordin gly , the app lication for w rit of man dam us pe ndin g bef ore t his court is deni ed. Br ian Qui nn C hie f Just ic e3
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wind Energy America Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Robert O. Knutson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated:   May 21, 2007



/s/ Robert O. KnutsonRobert O. KnutsonChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer


---