alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,  George Rozakis,  President,  CEO,  and  Acting  Chief  Financial  Officer of
Implantable Vison, Inc. (the "Company"), certify that:

1. The  Quarterly  Report on Form  10QSB of the  Company  for the  period  ended
April 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         Dated:  June 23, 2006           Officer:   George Rozakis

                                        Name:       /s/ George Rozakis
                                                    ----------------------------
                                        Position:  President, CEO/CFO
" \\ 

,, '" 

1 II I\ I\ 

roved for Release b NSA on 07-2 -2014 ursuantto E.O. 135
Dr· A. Mot Gleason 

g .. 21,. Lo1re11 Howse 

He.t"Val'd Un1ver1it7 

Cembr.1dge 1 Maa$achu.aette 

Dear Dr. Glee.sen · 

REF ID:A41583ij . ~ 

Serial.2 ,;}.2 O 3 

A joint meeting of e.U three panel.a arg.:mize<l ~r tb.e 

National Security Agency Sc1ent~1c Ad:visory Board 18 b¢112.S 

pla.nned tor 20-21 May 1954. · .. 

The tir•t day wtll be devoted to. accompUshlns N1m:lntatrat1ve 

details and faa111Er1z1ns thos·e panel M11ber1 not previowsly 

acqUe.inted with the Ag~ncy With.the highlights ot our orgau1is.t1on 

and .ate.ff. 1'he second day. is to be · devoted to a detailed preaenta. ... 

tioo end.d.'bcuaaion. of SOllV) of our tecbnical ~bleu aud to plans 

fer :ruture panel act1v:i.t1ee 10 • 

You will not be required to attend the meeting on 20 Ma.y, but 

it ts elncerely hoped tb.o.t :fOtl will be e.bl.' to be preeent tor ta . 21 Mq meeting. tt :you Yill let mo know thut you plan to attend, · and the mode of' travel you p:ref E-r, I vill have the necqaary travel 

order• sent to you. 

AG , c/s · · · ·· 

S/ASST (Mr. Friedman) 

cc: 

WILLL'\M P. FRI3IH:\W 

Executive Secretary 

NSA Sc1ent1t1c Advits0%7 Board 

M/R: AnD,ounces joint meeting of three panels of the NSASJ\B and 

invites panel member 1 s attendance. · 

. I.T.McD~nald, S/ABST/60493/9Apr54 

@'pproved for Relea.se by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Amy E. Miles, Chief Financial Officer of United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc., certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



Date:
March 30, 2005

| |  | By: |  | /s/AMY E. MILESAmy E. Miles
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
| |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Div. 53 Room 

Addreu onl11 

"The CornmiMl<>ncr or Patent9, 

Waahlnlllon, D. C.," 

and not llDJ' official by name 

REF ID:A521677 

260 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE 

VH T: oac WASHINGTON 

Please li.nd below a communication from the EXAMINER in 

Paper Xo. 3 All rommaniOltione "'8p<'<"tinP. Ibis appllca1;0~ Hhould ~Ive the ecrlal number, W.tc of f.lin~. and name of lhe ap[>licant 

charge of this application. (,{) ~ 

••• 11-&2a ~Comml.1.1io11t1 of Patmts. Applicant: W1111e.tti P. Friedman 

Robert V. L"aughlin & 

Charles A. Rowe 

c/o Chief Ot The Air Corps. 

llun1 tions Building 

Washington, n. c. 

Ser. No. 

Filed 

For 

,YAR 1 H'~! 

Pl'iedman 

Hebern 

Danm 

Dmmn 

Reterencea •de ot record: 

Jan. 28, 1936 

Sept. 4, 1928 

June 2, 1925 

Oct. 4, 1922 

35-4 

35-4 

35-4 

35-4 

In Damm of 1925 lmoba v2 are cams and in Damm of 

1927 papta 24a are cams. They are used to actuate other 

aeebanieal parta and 1n these two patents they are the equivalents 

ef applicant'• eaaa ,02. The claim.a are rejected on theae 

patea.ta and also on the gronnd of lack o~ invention to move 

the pa:rta ot the device 11h1ch atep.s the CO!ll!Utator elements of 

th• Pried.man or Hebern devices by the cam apparatus or either 

Dua device. 

JA'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-22-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§
REF ID:A71139 

FUNCTIONS OF SECURITY DIVISION 

A. TECHNICAL STAFF 

Long range planning for communications security facilities and 

allocation of cryptologic materiel. 

B. MATERIEL BRA?JCH 

Product1on,,issue,4nlaccounting of all cryptographic systems 4J:d. 

materiel for th& Amy and procedures therefore. 

C. METHODS BRANCH - ~ "'-'., ..... ~ 

Responsible for cryptographic security, preparation and review 

of communication security doctrine and constantl.1' attacks crypto 

security of u. s. A:ney- systems. 

D. PROTECTIVE BRANCH - ~ .,......o+'•w• I \. 

Responsible for transmission security, preparation of security 

monitoring assignments and all radio deception functions. 

E. MAINTENANCE BRANCH - C \-\ "W\ 

Inspection and repair of all cryptographic equipment, preparation 

of maintenance doctrine)and supervision of new equipment 4 J' ' 7 

• , 

7

, , • , ,., ,... P/JC,-ro"r J.JN ,en;. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit 10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

AMENDMENT TO THE PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC. COMBINED EXECUTIVE 
 RETIREMENT PLAN 
 This Amendment to the Pepco Holdings, Inc. Combined
Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) is hereby made effective as of this first day of August, 2011, in order to freeze the Plan with regard to participation by any individuals not already participating in the Plan as of July 31,
2011. 
 WITNESSETH 
 WHEREAS, Pepco Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) sponsors the Plan, and desires to freeze the Plan to new participants; and 

WHEREAS, the Company, by resolution of its board of directors, has the power to amend the Plan in accordance with Section 6.5
thereof; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company’s board of directors has approved this amendment to the Plan. 

NOW THEREFORE, the Plan shall be amended as follows: 
 1. Effective as of August 1, 2011, the following new Section 2.4 is added at the end of Section II of the Plan, to read: 

“2.4 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan, no individual shall be a Participant in the Plan on or
after August 1, 2011 who was not already a Participant in the Plan as of July 31, 2011.” 
 2. In all other
respects, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect without change. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this
Amendment to the Plan to be executed and this __28th            day of __July            , 2011.


			
	PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph M. Rigby
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                       353
<INVENTORY>                                      2,567
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,264
<PP&E>                                          11,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,782
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,230
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            56
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,782
<SALES>                                          2,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,233
<CGS>                                            1,620
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,233
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   (3)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,997)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,997)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,997)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.35)
        

</TABLE>
#### Webster, Respondent, vs. Moore and others, Appellants.

*September 26, 1900*

January *8, 1901.*

*Webster v. Pierce, ante,*p. 407, followed.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Lang-lade county: Johh Goodland, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

Appeal from a judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor against all of the defendants in an action of ejectment. The pleadings and facts are similar to those in *Webster v. Fierce, ante,*p. 407, and the questions of law presented by the appeal are the same. The actions differ only in the parties defendant, the lands involved, the date of the tax deeds, and some other matters not material to the legal questions upon which the appeal turns.

*Geo. W. Laita,*for the appellants.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Geo. G. Greeney*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Greene*and *Mr. W. H. Webster.*

The following opinion was filed October 12, 1900:

MaRshall, J.

This case is ruled in appellants’ favor by the decision in *Webster v. Pierce, ante,*p. 407. We refer to-the opinion there instead of rediscussing the points decided.

*By the*Court.— The judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to render-judgment for the defendants dismissing the complaint with costs.

Oassoday, O. J., took no part.

The respondent moved for a rehearing.

For the appellants there was a brief by *Geo. W. Latta,,*and for the respondent a brief by *W. H. Webster, per se,*and *Geo. G. Greene,*of counsel.

The motion was denied January 8, 1901.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1868 

To extend by 15 years the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to conduct 

the quarterly financial report program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 27, 2015 

Mr. CARPER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To extend by 15 years the authority of the Secretary of 

Commerce to conduct the quarterly financial report program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Quarterly Financial 

5 Reporting Reauthorization Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1868 IS

1 SEC. 2. FIFTEEN-YEAR EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR 

2 SECRETARY OF COMMERCE TO CONDUCT 

3 THE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT PRO4 GRAMS. 

5 Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend 

6 title 13, United States Code, to transfer responsibility for 

7 the quarterly financial report from the Federal Trade 

8 Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, and for other 

9 purposes’’, approved January 12, 1983 (13 U.S.C. 91 

10 note), is amended by striking ‘‘2015’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘2030’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 10-20830

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. DAVID VASSER; SHIRLEY ADGER, Defendants-Appellants.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (4:08-cr-00640-5)

Before JONES, Chief Judge, WIENER and GRAVES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Defendants-Appellants David Vass e r an d S hirl ey Ad ge r w e re a m ong those charged in a 12-count gr a n d j u ry indictment that resulted from a large and l e n gthy mortgage fraud operation. Adger was charged with one count o f conspiring to commit mail and wire fraud and a second count of substantive wire fraud. Vas s e r was charged with five counts comprising conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, and engaging in monetary transactions involving criminally derived property. Both Adger and U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 8, 201 2 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-20830 Document: 00511881900 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/08/2012No. 10-20830

Vasser were convicted by a jury on all counts, and both raise numerous claims of error on appeal. Adger contends that the district court erred in refusing her requested jury instructions on good faith and int e n t , a n d complains of the sufficiency of the evidence to convict her. She also claims that she is harmed by a large number of omissions, as unintelligible, from the record of the trial proceedings. Vasser asserts that the trial court abused its discretion in admitting extrinsic evidence, under Rule 404(b), of similar fraudulent acts he committed sho r t l y b e fore the beginning of the instant consp i r a c y , and of plain error in giving a Rule 404(b) limiting instruction only a t t h e c onclusion of the trial. The defendants also assert that the district court erred in allowing marker tags to go to the jury on various documentary exh ib i t s a n d in admitting broker files from the offices of Motown Mortgage Group into evidence. A careful review of the record in this case and of the briefs of the parties,

as well as oral argument by able counsel for both defendants, coupled with our consideration of the facts and the law as revealed thereby and as set forth in the appellate briefs of the parties, satisfies us th a t t h e evidence was sufficient to support the convictions of both defendants on all count s a nd that each error claimed by the defendants either did not constitute reversible error or, at most, constituted harmless error. Consequently, the convictions of both DefendantsAppellants should be, and hereby are, AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 10-20830 Document: 00511881900 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/08/2012
I 

~1 

' I 

I \ • REF ID:A67796. 

INR .... YR ... 'IO 

I 

Subjeot. 

"l'o: 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

Patent Application, Ser. No. 36,868 

Electrical switching Mechanism 

Mr. William F. l!'riedman end 

Mr. !'rank B. Rowlett, 

Intelligence Section, 

war Plans and Training Division, 

Office of the Chief Signal Ofticer. 

May l2' 1938. 

le Tb.is will report a turtber action in this case and thert 

is enclosed a COPJ' of' the Examiner's letter of April 18, 19381 together 

With copies ot the neWl.y cited reference patents. 

2. In view of' the general attitude ot the Examiner at this 

stage of' the prosecution, it seems desirable tbst a fol'lllBl response be 

deterred until abortly bef'on the expiration of the time limit. It will 

then be time enough to discuss the validity of' the :Exemuier•s contentions. 

The criticism found in the marked para.graph on p8'P;e 1, speaks f'or itaelfe 

The field of argument appeara to be pretty well exhausted on this point, 

but whatever may be said about the alleged insufficiency of' the apecif'ioation, it ia believed tbat the drawing oan allf&l'B be relied upon to support 

the theory of operation and • have the right to amend and amplifT the 

apeoiticat!on to cure whatever ma.v~be lacking just aa long aa we can rel.J' 

upon the show1ng itself. 

3. This case is still open to prosec.ution and surely there ia 

patentable subject matter as admitted by the :Examiner. The prosecution 

ot this case baa been rendered more difticul t by the piecemeal citation 

of art. In any event, all grounds of 'objection can be disoussed at 

length in connection '11th the preparation of the next response and, it 

neoesaary, the case ma7 be- taken up wi:t;h 1ihe ]!lxamin~ on personal inter ... view prior to the actual tiling ot the next amendment. 

w' 

Charles A· Rowe, 

Bncl. Patents section, Signal Corps 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-05-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e ,,. -- - r 

... --- ---
Brigadier General WaeJ.e¥ i;c. Guest 

Chier Signo.1 Off ice~ 

Headquarters WAREUR 

Atio l+o3 

Ne" '1ol~k 1 Na., York. 

14 April 1955 

)ho. rritt&:an baa aaked m to tbank. you tor m1 ackno«<l ... 

td&* receipt ot the mate:da.l conce..--ning liemns and Hal.a~ 

Akt!engesoll.Schatt vhich you forwarded to hilt on 6 April. 

)lr. Friedmn i• presently in tblJ Oeoree Waishington 

Univer•i"t1' Ho.pit.l recuperating tram a heart attack and 

1a ~aaing u vell u oan bet expected. .A.ccordiPG to 

the Doctors, be vill be awtq from tbe ottice approxir:e.tely 

•1&ht veeka. 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3
#### SOUTHLAND ROYALTY COMPANY et al., Texaco, Inc., Exxon Corporation, and Mobil Oil Corporation, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Nos. 75-3373, 75-2851, 75-3682, 75-3819 and 75-4001.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 1978.

J. Evans Attwell, Henry S. May, Jr., Houston, Tex., for petitioner in No. 75-3373.

J. Evans Attwell, P. M. Schenkkan, Travis C. Broesche, Houston, Tex., Ernest E. Smith, III, Austin, Tex., Platt W. Davis, III, Washington, D. C., for Southland Royalty Co.

Kirk W. Weinert, Roger L. Brandt, C. Fielding Early, Jr., Houston, Tex., for Texaco, Inc.

Sherman S. Poland, Bernard A. Foster, III, Martin N. Erck, Douglas E. Mock, Houston, Tex., for Exxon Corp.

Robert D. Haworth, Houston, Tex., for Mobil Oil.

C. Frank Reifsnyder, Washington, D. C., Richard S. Morris, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Harris S. Wood, Atty., El Paso, Tex., G. Scott Cuming, Gen. Counsel, Houston, Tex., for El Paso Natural Gas Co.

Randolph W. Deutsch, J. Calvin Simpson, Richard D. Gravelle, San Francisco, Cal., for People & Public Utilities Comm, of State of Cal.

Jeffrey A. Meith, Los Angeles, Cal., for Southern California Gas Co.

Malcolm H. Furbush, San Francisco, Cal., Harris S. Wood, El Paso, Tex., for Pacific Gas & Elec. Co.

John Davenport, Austin, Tex., for Texas Independent Producers, etc.

Thomas W. Derryberry, Asst. Atty. Gen., William 0. Jordan, Santa Fe, N. M., for State of N. M.

William P. Pannill, F. H. Pannill, Houston, Tex., for Crane City Development Co.

J. Milton Richardson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., amicus curiae, for State of Tex.

James E. Williams, Lake Charles, La., amicus curiae, for Commissioner of Conservation of La., etc.

Paul E. DeGraffenreid, Atty., Commissioners of the Land Office, State of Okl., Oklahoma City, Okl., amicus curiae, for State of Okl. ex rel. Comm, of the Land Office.

Robert W. Perdue, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Steven A. Taube, Douglas L. Corbett, At-tys., Drexel D. Journey, Gen. Counsel, Allan A. Tuttle, Howard E. Shapiro, Sols., F. P. C., Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Martin N. Erck, Paul W. Wright, Houston, Tex., Sherman S. Poland, Bernard A. Foster, Jr., Ralph C. Oser, Washington, D. C., for petitioner in No. 75-3819.

Before CLARK, RONEY, and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States in *California et al. v. Southland Royalty Company et al.,*1978, - U.S. -, 98 S.Ct. 1955, 56 L.Ed.2d 505, the opinion of this court dated December 13, 1976, in *Southland Royalty Company v. Federal Power Commission,*543 F.2d 1134 (1976), is VACATED and the decision of the Federal Power Commission here on review is

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit 23.2**

 

**CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-59500, 333-95605 and 333-30384) pertaining to the 1991 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan, the Amplicon Corp. Stock OptionPlan, the Tularik Matching Plan and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Tularik Inc., and Form S-3 (Nos. 333-67366, 333-65232 and 333-102637) of our report dated February 4, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of TularikInc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP 

 

Palo Alto, California 

March 14, 2003