alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Regulatory Evaluation
Docket No
. FAA- Directorate lde
. ntifier: -AD 

### Add the H'ork hours. parts cost, and number 

## q/ US. registeredproducls to the !able below. When you are flu is!ted. click on the
.. Update Fields., hull

### on to awomatically.fill in the totals. 

### Update Fields 

# j
Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., a ircraft, engine, (e.g., In spection , propeller, appliance)

replacement) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost To ta l Costs Number of Total Cost Do not include on- (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U.S
. F leet condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products 

### Inspection. repair, I 

### de. 1 ( •(! )I) Inspection 

### 1.2 I 0**~** N/A ' t} I(**I~** I''} 

### 123 1 · -l ( f ·'; 

## ' t) (H \ O
. O!J**~** 

### n ,, ' (! (}I (• 1 !1 1 .... fliP I d! 'I 'ljl 

## ' 1 ) 011 I) ( lf ,II 

# " ,,: ; l ( 1!1 

### r; .. 0 ) '**~** I.U\1 " (I 0(1 ) 01 

# " /J. 

## on . . ti {l(l I I Ill) 

# ... 0.(•') 

### ' '.1 II{ I ... !I ()(l 

## o no ' 0 ( , p () ()\) l)IH, '1 1 II I tlU ' 0 lit' ll !'I 

# .. \l ! I) 

# " 0 ')f l ( 

### n nn 

# .. ' r:l)

•' I ( i )(I

I ( !J( I )' l ()I ,l 1/l ( l)r I II!, ) 1HI

The known number of products in comp li ance: 

### Nu m ber Total Costs of compliance for 

### U.S. fleet: $ 0 Costs covered under wmTanty 

### (if known) $ Warranty
On-Conditio n Costs:
.. Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product Action (include access, (@$85/hour) (e.g., In spection, testing, and close-

replacement) up) Inspection 

### 1.2 ,fl N / A f I 'J : ) Replacement 

### 34 .::cl•}CJ O.P" 

### $ 

### 5,291 

## \ :p:,**~.** !l,(l{l 

# '· (' i)/ 1

### Spec ial cons id erat io n s for Economic Ana l ys is (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvio us. This field can also be used t o explain warranty costs): 

### Exec utiv e Order 1 2866: 

### Could th e 

### AD be considered a " significant regu l atory



# action **?~** YES* 0 NO IZI * Explanation: DOT Regu latory Policies and Procedures: 

### I s th e 

### AD s i gn ificant?

- ; YES* D NO IZI *Explanation: Regulator-y F lex ibili ty Act: 

### Will the 

### AD have a s ignifican t economic impact on a substantial numbe r of s mall entities? Explain for e ith e r a Y es or No answer.



# ~ YES 0 NO IZI Explanat i on: Intrastat e Aviat io n in Alaska: 

### Thi s 

### AD co uld affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate to inc lude spec ific req uirements for aircraft oper ate d in Alaska where av i ation might be the only m ode of tr ansportation?



# ~ YES* 0 NO IZI *Explanation:
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2057 

To appropriately limit the size of the population required for urban areas 

of metropolitan statistical areas. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2021 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. KELLY) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To appropriately limit the size of the population required 

for urban areas of metropolitan statistical areas. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Metropolitan Statis5 tical Area Preservation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. POPULATION OF URBAN AREAS. 

7 Section 3504 of title 44, United States Code, is 

8 amended by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(l) In implementing subsection (e)(3), the Direc10 tor— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2057 IS

1 ‘‘(1) shall not establish, for purposes of desig2 nating areas as metropolitan statistical areas, or any 

3 successor thereto, a minimum population for the 

4 urban area of such a metropolitan statistical area 

5 that is more than 50,000; and 

6 ‘‘(2) may, only for statistical purposes, and in 

7 addition to the minimum population for urban areas 

8 described in paragraph (1), establish other statistical 

9 area designations with minimum population require10 ments for urban areas that are higher than the min11 imum population for an urban area described in 

12 paragraph (1).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

    <ARTICLE>                         5
           
    <S>                               <C>
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
    <PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1998
    <PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-1998
    <CASH>                                            0
    <SECURITIES>                                      0
    <RECEIVABLES>                                     0
    <ALLOWANCES>                                      0
    <INVENTORY>                                       0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
    <PP&E>                                            0
    <DEPRECIATION>                                    0
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    0
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
    <BONDS>                                           0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
    <PREFERRED>                                       0
    <COMMON>                                          0
    <OTHER-SE>                                   672769
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      0
    <SALES>                                           0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
    <CGS>                                             0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
    <INCOME-TAX>                                      0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
    <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
    <CHANGES>                                         0
    <NET-INCOME>                                      0
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

    
</TABLE>
N 480.CJ 

OJJI! 

~ 

~ 

Ch1d ot statt tar Iatellignce . 

or tba lftt:/' !be~ . 

WUb1DgtoD 25, D. C. 

~ General W!llms: 

leterenee 1a made to :fQUr' l~'kr; J'Ue ACSI·IUO,. ~ 

21 !fovember 1960. 

We ~- gratit:letl to learn that ~ Slllc:m':l'tJ' Al{;1mq =cip!UOD ~- last Jo1J1t U.S. ~ 11..L - on tile I _ I givft!4 to be ~ to tJ1a sneea• et tbe 

\iO . er&:lce. 

L. a·. IJiOS'l' 

Vice Adllinl; US 

Mrector 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-25-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A44645 

.;_·,,..;<{~·~t. :: ..... ~~ :>~ ?---- '<··:,:/·.1~·-·ttr:; 

cc: l>IR>:.~ ~~ ... Beading File 

PJlOD-051 

PBGD-001 

PBOJ.>-05 

c,:. PBOD-o4 

PROD-02 

GENS 

GEZfS..;1 

OPS 

·-·· .' -~ • .• ·":-...Go:.f• a 1 ·•. 

Serial: 

N 

M/R: General Willems letter indicated. the value of NSA participation 

in the last Joint U.S. - U.K. conference and invited NBA to participate 

in the :f'orthccrming eonf'erence to be held in London 23-27 .1&nU&J:'7 1961.. 

Although t.b.e NSA representative wou1d be a member o-r the ACSI 

de1egation, General Willems indicated that the Army did DQt have 

sufficient :f'unds to cover the expense o~ our repreaentative. Above 

reply sel.1'-explanatoey. Approved by Assistant Dil'ec:tor, PROD. 

J. D. BUTLER, PROD-051, 3643, a.Jg, 5 Dec 60
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AARON PITTMAN NO. 

### 2022 KW 0081 APRIL 8, 2022 In Re: Aaron Pittman, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Washington, No. 

### 92- CR1- 52115. BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND THERIOT, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. PMC JEW MRT

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

## DEPTTTJ' CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Company’s Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Numbers 333-11669, 333-42403 and 333-130077) and on Form S-3 (Registration Numbers 333-08391 and 333-08216), of our report dated March 14, 2011, on our audit of the financial statements of CPI Aerostructures, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 and for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 appearing in the 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K.








/s/ J.H. Cohn LLP-----------------Jericho, New YorkMarch 14, 2011
EXHIBIT 99

|Contact: | PS Financial, Inc.Kimberly P. RooneyPresident and CEOChicago, Illinois(773) 376-3800 |  | PNA Holding CompanyLawrence H. ChlumPresidentNiles, Illinois(847) 966-7900
|-------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1845 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1845

  To amend the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act to provide for 
State and tribal management and protection of wild free-roaming horses 
                  and burros, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2015

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act to provide for 
State and tribal management and protection of wild free-roaming horses 
                  and burros, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wild Horse Oversight Act''.

SEC. 2. STATE AND TRIBAL MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION OF WILD FREE-ROAMING 
              HORSES AND BURROS.

    Public Law 92-195 (commonly known as the ``Wild Free-Roaming Horses 
and Burros Act'') is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 12. STATE AND TRIBAL MANAGEMENT AND PROTECTION.

    ``(a) In General.--Except as provided by subsection (b), at the 
request of the legislature or Governor of a State or the governing body 
of a federally recognized Indian tribe, the Secretary of the Interior 
and the Secretary of Agriculture shall allow the State or federally 
recognized Indian tribe to assume all management and protection 
functions under this Act regarding wild free-roaming horses and burros 
on land within the boundaries of the State or federally recognized 
Indian tribe. After a State or federally recognized Indian tribe 
assumes such functions, wild free-roaming horses and burros shall be 
managed by the State or federally recognized Indian tribe in accordance 
with this Act and in the same manner as any other non-federally 
regulated species regarding functions not specified in this Act.
    ``(b) Inventory.--The Secretary concerned shall continue to 
maintain the inventory required by section 3(b)(1).''.
                                 <all>
```
.-

Jr 

# 0

OFFlCE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN em&me---aEoiorablo z?mast Gu.itm CountpAttornay

county

Your roqImt for en .o Ti?m g?mla jury ire8 to bo appointed ITS a aqdp uharlft, w der to aselat the shdfr 0n WSX~~US 33t he is not 

### enfia.agcd ln diacharglng his dut &fivebeen roquoo he amybe appo 122 and MO.

### O-373. laatenoes in &oh pay I was wonderlri in a oeoe where tha 

### @and jury bailiff, ny eroaeua QO.00 a

o fact thst the CCrmi.ssi~ers~~Court tho pay or deputies, would it be their pr~mlssio~ for appolutmnt of in,cur opinion 80. 

### O-373that the Cosstltutloo. OfTsxae prohibits a da3uty shcxiff 

### fronsaroine a8 bailiff30 th.oeand jury o&d aoooptin& pny for both Ofi’iioe~. kiellkuwioa held in suoh oplnlotl that a deputy bharlf$ and a grand.jury bailifr WQ both Oiflocm or the Btate.

.,.. ‘, .
1

‘L-Honorable Pnsst G&m, page 2



### Artlolss 367and Jb’?b, Code of Crfmlnal Prooadure, 

### rortho 

### l

p~ointmant of grand Jury baiUfrrr Artlola 

### 368, Crlmlnsl froccdure, prcrldeo: WA ,ballltr 1s to obey the lmtruot1or.s of the fore%ui, rmmon all 

### wltn45se8, and, gencriiUj, to perrorm all auoh dutlcs 

### as the iorenan my requlib of him. Onebailiff &all bo alwayr with the grand Jury, it two or more are appolnt4cLw Thus it Is a&amt that a mai jurv balllii ia subjeot at all tlznos to tho pokformauoe of hir duti’em amsuoh during the 

### period the grand jury is *.inse~elon,

A deputy ohorltf la subject to the orders or thr 

### sherlrf and could **be** rcqulxcjd b the sheriff to poiiorm osrtala duties even thou& he.qae enti d od to no salary therefor. It .that thcr&zlght be & oonfllot between WY. Ii th6 sheriff-should oall upon a duty during tho timeot hi8 remlo@ to would **be** suoh a oouillot of authority aa 1s pooslble thorizforo the ohcriif and tg?md Ns doputy to pertarm the grad jury, there to icnderthe 0rfi00tilnoompatlble

.

Ke held 

### In

__ our’ opinion no. 

### O-1263that a de ty 

### sheriff could not hold a aomxaalon aB a speoial Rawer e~oh t 

### rowh he 0;~s to draw no ‘pay faF the latter poaltioa. Fi6

### believe uoh opinion forcoloses the questlau aubmltted and required o zr aaswer ln the ao&lve, w4 4nolo~s a oopy of sUOhopinion 

### rar your ooneldcratlon.



### Inviewof ournnffwer to your first 

### quastloai It 18 unneosssary to an@mr the oeoond question submttted. Yours 

### r&y truly
IN RE1 

REF ID : A2 7 2 ft&P 

., 

IN 'l'f1E UNITID STATES PATENT OFFICE 

Application of * WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN' 

* Serial Nmnber 

6S2.096 * 

Filed * 25 July 1933 

* For 

CRYP'l'OGRAl'H!G S!S'l'F.M * 

* * * ** * * *. * 

TO& The Honorable Commissioner of Patents 

Washington 251 D. C. 

Sirt 

Division 53 

fhe underaigned hereby revokes any and all powers or attor.ney 

heretof'ore given to prosecute the application for patent above 

identified and does illS\eacl appoint Hmu-y B. Stautter, whose postoffice address is care ct the Arlzy' SecuriV Agency, The Pentagon, 

Waahil'.lgton 25, D. c., his attorney, with full power of substitution 

and revocation, to prosecute said application, to make alterations 

. and aaemments \herein, to receive the patent, and to transact all 

lUiness in the Patent Ottice connected therewith. 

Signed in the Cftll1;J' or Arlington and State of Virginia this 

~I ,,:t da:r of 4t4. , A, D, 1947, 

Respectfully, 

iib.:taI'l F. P'riedman, Applicant 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-13-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 23, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40708 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE EDUARDO HERNANDEZ-BELTRAN, also known as Francisco Javier Beltran, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:04-CR-1060-ALL

-------------------- Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Eduardo Hernandez-Beltran (Hernandez) appeals his guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being illegally present in the United States following removal. Hernandez argues that the district court erred by finding that his prior Texas felony conviction for burglary of a habitation was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). In United States v. GarciaMendez , 420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert. filed (Dec. 15, 2005)(No. 05-8542), this court held that a priorNo. 05-40708 -2- Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation was a prior conviction for a crime of violence under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii) because it was equivalent to the enumerated offense of burglary of a dwelling. Hernandez asserts that Garcia-Mendez is inapplicable to the present case because the issue in that case was reviewed for plain error and because this court did not apply the categorical analysis mandated by Taylor v. United States , 495 U.S. 575 (1990). While the review of this issue in Garcia-Mendez was for plain error, this court clearly held that a Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation was a conviction for a crime of violence under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). See Garcia-Mendez , 420 F.3d at 456-57. Hernandez’s argument that this court did not properly apply the categorical analysis of Taylor in GarciaMendez is nothing more than an argument that Garcia-Mendez was incorrectly decided, and is unavailing. See Burge v. Parish of St. Tammany , 187 F.3d 452, 466 (5th Cir. 1999) (applying prior panel rule). Hernandez’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Hernandez contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding.
See United States v. Garza-Lopez , 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),No. 05-40708 -3- cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Hernandez properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.
AFFIRMED.
, 

. - REF ID:A27293~ .. •· 

IN REPLY REFER TO 

WAR DEPARTMENT 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 

J'uly 12, 1933. 

Memo rand'\ml For Mr. \¥'111 iam 1'". Friedman, Crypte.nalyst, 

Signal Intelligence Section, W.P. & T Div., 

Office Of ~l'he Chief Signal Officer, Mu.n.1 tions :Bldg., 

' Washington. 

Subjects New Patent Application, Cryptographic System (Improvement on 

Serial No. 588,344 ) 

l. The documents for your proposed new application identified 

above ha.ve been completed and are sulxnitted herewith for your a:pproval 

and execution prior to filing 1n the Pa.tent Off ice. 

2. To facilitate correction• as may be found necessary, the drawings have been prepared in pencil and ~ photostatic copies of the two 

sheets are included with the other papers. 

3. In executing the application, please aign in three places a.nd 

be sure in ea.ch instance to sign your :t'u.11 first, middle initial and last 

names. The Oath must be acknowledged before a Notary Public who mu.st also 

sign and impress his notarial seal. 

4. If you have any changes or corrections to suggest, please indicate 

the same in the carbon copy which is also enclosed for that purpose. Upon the 

return of the executed documents together with the carbon copy, the application 

will be promptly placed in order and filed in the Patent Office. 

Charles A. Rowe, 

Patents Section, Signal Corps, 

Enc ls. 

CONfiDENTlAt 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-18-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-29-1997
<CASH>                                              98
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1003
<ALLOWANCES>                                        21
<INVENTORY>                                       1323
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   274
<PP&E>                                            5389
<DEPRECIATION>                                    4761
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3614
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             2328
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          3508
<OTHER-SE>                                      (2870)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3614
<SALES>                                           6103
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  6103
<CGS>                                             4495
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     5975
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (42)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  47
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     86
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 86
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        86
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 99.1

 

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

 

            Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, Unites States Code), each of the undersigned officers of CPAC, Inc., a New York corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "10-Q Report") that:

 
(1)  the 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
(2)  the information contained in the 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 
 **CPAC, INC.
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
Dated:             August 13, 2002           
By  
/s/ Thomas N. Hendrickson                           **
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 19

- 00456

- CV

IMPACTO MEDIA, INC.

, Appellant

v.

UNITED INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT

, Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019

- CVH

- 001030

- D3 Honorable Sid L. Harle, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. Each party shall bear its respective costs. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1(d).

SIGNED August 7, 2019.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
..... ' 

... ~;:REF ID:A67333 

i 

• 

• 

-

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-10-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 
• REF IB : A67 33.