alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
... ... .. 

.. \ 

- . 

, 

~ 

.. 

t 

~ i ... 

~ 

( 

.... ~ 

• 

" 1 , 

• 

~ 

\ 

... 

• 

REF ID:A363304 

AUG -9 1944 

C Y. R T I P I t A T B ----------- TO t'J:B couumsxom:a OF PATlmS 

I here'bl' certify tJaat the 1nnntim ~ 

1111Uam F. Prladr.tan, an •pl.cvoe ot tho OoviiftaiG11'1 

relat4.D& to a new and uaetul 1aproval8D't in an 

• 

.. 

D.IC':RICAL f-XSTlll, ia liable to be used .in the piblJ.o 

iutereat. and I cone1dar t.he oa1d invention to be ono tba\ 

( 

_.. within tho purview of the Act ot Uarcb J, 188J1 

"u wmdad. b7 the Aat ot April JO, 1928. 

I' 

• 

, 

-

(C.rned) RODER~ A. LOVE?? 

• 

' ' 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

.....
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.2



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

         We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of our report dated July 2, 1999, except for
Footnote M which is dated October 6, 1999 relating to the financial statements
of Be Free, Inc. and its subsidiaries, which appears in Be Free, Inc.'s
Registration Statement on Form S-1 as amended.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
------------------------------
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
November 11, 1999
[4910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

(Docket No. FAA-2010-055~h.Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-124-AD; Amendme

\(045tf JO-l-,

39-*****j AD 2010-**-**}

RlN 212ll-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series

100 & 440) Airplanes; Model CL-600-2CIO (Regional Jet Series 700, 701, & 702)

Airplanes; Model CL-600-2DI5 (Regional Jet Series 705) Airplanes; and Model

CL-600-2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

~C\lRIlt~CI:S

(}IJIINGSV"OOl

n

"1/'" 10

NITIA'-'''''''

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products list n:

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infomlation (MeAl)

origmated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MCAl describes the unsafe condition as:

Two cases ofa crack on a "dry" ADG [air driven generator] (Hamilton

Sundstrand part number in the 761339 series), in the aft area of the stmt

and generator housing assembly, have been reported on CL-600-2B19

aircraft. The same part is also installed on CL-600-2C I0, -2D 15 and

-2D24 aircraft. Investigation determined that tbe crack was in an area of

the stmt where the wall thickness of the casting was below specification,

due to a manufacturing anomaly in a specific batch of ADOs. Structural

failure and departure of the ADO during deployment could possibly result

in damage to the aircraft structure. If deployment was activated by a dual

engine shutdown, ADO structural failure would also result in loss of

ROlITrNGsn.,nOl

NlTlAL.sISI(;

OA1E

i

i ROlITlNG sYMIIOl.

I'NlT'AI..S'SiG

I

I"n

I 1l'G 5Y"'llOl

I~."",",~",",,,---
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO 18
U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of ISCO International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Act of 1934; and



2. The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JOHN THODE         
|John Thode             
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 31, 2005         
|                       
|/s/ FRANK CESARIO      
|Frank Cesario          
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 31, 2005
**EXHIBIT 23.1**
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**
      We have issued our report dated January 12, 2001, except for the final sectionof Note 12 and for Note 13, as to which the dates are February 26, 2001, andMarch 19, 2001, respectively, on the consolidated balance sheet of IllinoisSuperconductor Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000, and therelated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cashflows of Illinois Superconductor Corporation for the year ended December 31,2000, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31,2000 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of our report in the Registration Statements on FormS-3 (File numbers 333-53338, 333-45406, 333-46658 and 333-53646) and Form S-8 (File numbers 333-39342and 333-49268). /s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Chicago, Illinois
Exhibit 10-n-2







Schedule of Executives of the Company who are a party to the Change of Control Agreement:







Three-Year Agreement








	
1.

	
Clayton M. Jones








	
2.

	
Barry M. Abzug








	
3.

	
Patrick E. Allen








	
4.

	
John-Paul E. Besong








	
5.

	
Gary R. Chadick








	
6.

	
Gregory S. Churchill








	
7.

	
Bruce M. King








	
8.

	
Ronald W. Kirchenbauer








	
9.

	
Nan Mattai








	
10.

	
Jeffrey A. Moore








	
11.

	
Robert K. Ortberg








	
12.

	
Kent L. Statler








	
13.

	
Robert A. Sturgell







 


Two-Year Agreement








	
1.

	
David H. Brehm








	
2.

	
Marsha A. Schulte








	
3.

	
David S. Rokos








	
4.

	
Douglas E. Stenske
* Pursuan t to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances s et forth in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 99-20713 Summary Calendar

_____________________

CHARLES DENNIS SMITH,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

VERNETTE PORTER; ROCHELLE McKENNEY; OWEN MURRAY; F. CHERIAN, Dr.; NEVA YARBOROUGH,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CV-4287

_________________________________________________________________ April 4, 2000

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Charles Denni s Smith, Texas prisoner # 734317, appeals the

district court’s denial of his Rule 60(b) motion to reconsider the

summary judgment dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights

complaint. Smith alleged that the defendants were deliberately

indifferent to his serious medical needs.

Smith has not shown that any of the grounds enumerated in Rule

60(b)(1) to (5) are present and has not shown that extraordinary2

circumstances exist that would warrant relief under Rule 60(b)(6).

See Government Fin. Servs. On e Ltd. Partnership v. Peyton Place,

Inc.
, 62 F.3d 767, 773-74 (5th Cir. 1995). Smith has not shown

that the magistrate judge abused his discretion in denying his Rule

60(b) motion for relief from the judgment. See Seven Elves, Inc.

v. Eskenazi , 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. 1981)(en banc). Smith’s

appeal is frivolous and is therefore DISMISSED. S ee Howard v.

King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Smith is cautioned that any additional frivolous appeals filed by

him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions,

Smith is further cautioned to review any pending appeals to ensure

that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous because they

have been previously decided by this court.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
REF ID:A10512. 

eoMF±BEiM'l'IA:b 

Tn::G.AS-71 11 October 19/,.6 

SUBJECT Patent Application of Friedman and M"a.uborgne, SM 478,868 

TO Chief SJ.gnal Of .f'icer 

DJ.rector, Legal Division 

Patents and Inventions Branch 

4C 2741 The Pentagon 

Washington 25, D c. 

ATTENTION Mr. Harry n. Saragovitz 

1. Inclosed herewJ.th, :in duplicate, is a proposed amendment to 

the subJect application. 

2. The amendment is due in the Patent Office 16 October 1946 

FOR THE CFIEF, ARl'Y SECURITY ..GENCY 

1 Incl S. KULL3ACK 

Amendr.&1.t J.n dup Chief, Research and Develop:nent Division 

GOHfif>Eift'!A'.L 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuant to E .0. 1352a
# CE2004088EN.01020302.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/203 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/203

---

(2004/C 88 E/0211)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0675/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Transfrontier Shipments of Waste Regulation

Subject:

What reply, if any, has the Commission received from Ireland in response to the letter of formal notice sent to Ireland in April 2003, as announced in IP/03/544, regarding the Irish Government's failure to cooperate with the Commission's request for information on how Ireland has complied with the Transfrontier Waste Shipment Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 (1), following a complaint about irregularities in the required paperwork for waste exports from Ireland?

1

What action has the Commission taken or is it considering in this matter?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(21 April 2004)

(21 April 2004)

An Irish response to the Commission letter of formal notice referred to by the Honourable Member was received in June 2003. This response was considered as having brought to an end the infringement for non-cooperation based on Article 10 of the EC Treaty, and no further action is currently contemplated on this ground. The Commission is still considering the substantive issues raised by the complaint.

---

(1)  OJ L 30, 6.2.1993, p. 1.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,927
<SECURITIES>                                       100
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                       327
<INVENTORY>                                        653
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,910
<PP&E>                                           1,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,863
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,935
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,909
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,500
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,475
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,935
<SALES>                                          2,352
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                10,868
<CGS>                                            1,719
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,498
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   371
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,186
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,412)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,412)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,412)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.87)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              7
<CIK>                  0000352162
<NAME>                 NORTHEAST INSURANCE COMPANY
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                        13,005,308
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     136,664
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                              13,141,972
<CASH>                                       5,279,389
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                           3,568,279
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                       1,098,820
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              32,587,749
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             14,080,586
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                          6,921,706
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     3,046,842
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,446,296
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                32,587,749
<PREMIUMS>                                   2,538,957
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            223,763
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                              33,192
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   2,478,176
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  1,078,492
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (760,756)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (269,942)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (490,814)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (490,814)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.16)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.16)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
REE ~ID :A38721 

AFSA ATTACHED DOCUMENTS: 

ACTION 

ROUTING SLIP Class J.fication: UNCLA.SS IF IED 

The attached commum.cation req1ll.res action in- Date Rec'd• 

volving the initiation of a replying or implemen- 13 Apr 51 

ting communicationo This communication should be 

signed by the cognizant Chief, or presented for Orig: l 

the signature of higher authority, as appropriate, 

not later than 20 April 1951 o Serial: 

8144 

Route 

Order 

Routing 

S:vmbol AFSA Authority Initials Date Out FJJ..e#: 

A I ti ,.,, R. 1q ti j ! , . . 

COORDINATION WITH OTHER INTERESTED AFSA OFFICERS 

IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OFFICER ASSIGNED ACTIONo 

REMARKS· Carded/rwr 

fin"14ti1.,.1 ,.,.,{4 rr w,,11 f 

/-t.r ()d J .f•tj ~' _(V- t'f'• {H / 

FROM: USAFSS 

ENCL: 

Cy~ l 

Date: 

9 Apr 51 

Cy#: 

Ht Ot!A_,..,,.,.1 t},,.v_ -

NOTE: If the action has been ~ectly ~ --------- assigned, Retain ~rig:i.naJ.: the officer assigned the action is, nevertheless, opy: 

Refi/g 

\\ responsible for it until the assignment is changed, ~ either through arrangement with AFSA-11 (code 131, 

exto 60219) or, in urgent cases, through direct 

arrangement with the properly responsible officer, 

Action taken by AFSA Serial: 6 3 2 

.ill which case AFSA-11 should be notified as soon ROUTING SYMBOLS: 

as practicablea A-Action V-Illl.tial 

0-Comment W-Rewrite 

RETURN THIS ROUTING SLIP TO AFSA-sECRETARIAT, EVEN I-Info X-Indicate Routing 

THOUGH CORRESPONDENCE IS RETAINEDa R-Retain 

:209 

AFSA Form Nooa73 ROUTING SLIP NO: 

Revised J.4,,._Ma~ l.95l.@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-12-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e --~
##### 



Exhibit 31.1

Certification

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Christopher G. Chavez, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advanced
Neuromodulation Systems, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2003

/s/Christopher G. ChavezName: Christopher G. ChavezTitle: Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12553-12554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05365]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held April 7, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(954) 423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Tax Forms and 
Publications Project Committee will be held Tuesday April 7, 2015 at 
1:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Donna Powers. For more information please contact: Donna 
Powers at 1-888-912-

[[Page 12554]]

1227 or (954) 423-7977 or write: TAP Office, 1000 S. Pine Island Road, 
Plantation, FL 33324 or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org. The committee will be discussing various issues 
related to Tax Forms and Publications and public input is welcomed.

    Dated: March 3, 2015.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-05365 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### Morrow vs. The City of Green Bay.

*April 7*

May *10, 1882.*

*Stay of Proceedings for Reassessment.*

In an action to set aside tax sales and certificates, on the ground that the assessments were void, judgment in plaintiff’s favor is reversed for a refusal to stay proceedings until a reassessment should he made under sec. 12105, R. S., as amended by chapter 255 of 1879.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Brown*County.

The defendant appealed from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

*H. J. Huntington,*for the appellant.

The cause was submitted for the respondent on the brief of *Tracy db Bailey.*

*113Outon, J.

This action was brought to set aside certain tax sales and certificates on the ground of void assessments. At the close of the trial the appellant moved for a stay of proceedings until a reassessment could he made, which was refused, and judgment was rendered for the relief demanded in the complaint. The learned counsel on both sides agree that this was erroneous. *Single v. Town of Stettin,*49 Wis., 645; *Monroe v. Ft. Howard, 50*Wis., 228.

*By the*Oowrt.— The judgment of the circuit "court is reversed, and the cause remanded with direction to stay all proceedings in the action until a reassessment of the property in said city can.be had according to section .12105, R. S., as amended by chapter 255, Laws of 1879.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of TVI  Corporation  (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period  ending  March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I,  Richard V. Priddy,
Chief Executive  Officer,  of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


/s/ Richard V. Priddy
    Chief Executive Officer
    May 12, 2004