alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 26, 2010 

y0719 

Order 

 

July 26, 2010 

140779 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140779 

 COA: 295437 

Kent CC: 06-000554-FH 

LaQUAN LATRICE JONES, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 27, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
DI _.._y .... ,,, 

REF ID:A105139 

WAR DEPARl'MENT • 10. 

OOSig0-334.. ?'-Sig .O .Patent :Bd. ow1m oF THE CHIBF s1C1NAL. OPPICER 

WA9HlllG'l'CN 

Jarmary 8, 1937. 

MEMOlW1DtJM FOll: llr. 'I. F. Friedman 

1. llef'erenoe ia mad.a to memo1'&Dd1 nn from this office 

dated September 1, 1936, concerning the action of the S1gnal 

Corps Patent :Board on two inventions of yours and Colonel 

llaborgne•a. 

a. !l?hia office baa directed tbat appl1cat1ona f'or 

patanta of the inventions referred to be filed under the provialona of Par. 5, .&..:a. 880-50 and that au.ch applicatlona be 

placed under the ll!f!hree Year llul.en aa provided tor·1n Section 

4894 :a.a., aa amended 'b7 u.s.c. Title 35, Section 'SI. 

BJ' order of the Chief Sip&l Oi"floer1 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 09-11-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
EXHIBIT 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Mack V. Traynor, III, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of HEI, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.                                                              /s/ Mack V. Traynor, III   Mack V. Traynor, III   Chief Executive Officer and President   Date: July11, 2006
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-11-00373- CV

Elicia Bai ley, Appellant

v. Jere m y Gasaway, Appellee

F ROM CO UNTY COURT AT LAW NO . 4 O F WI LLIAM SO N COUNTY NO. 10- 3175 -F C4, H ONO RAB LE JO HN MCM ASTER, JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The cler k’s rec ord in this appea l is overdue to be filed. The trial court cler k’s office has repor ted that appellant Elicia Ba iley has failed to pay or make arr ang ements to pay for the cler k’s
rec ord in this appea l. This Court’s cler k sent a letter dated September 28, 2011 to Ba iley reque sting that she make arr ang ements to pay for the c lerk’s recor d and that she file a st atus repor t reg arding this appea l with this Court. Ba iley was reque sted to file a response in th i s Court on or befor e October 10, 2011 or risk dismissal of her a ppeal. October 10, 2011 has passed. The cler k’s rec ord has not be en filed, and Ba iley has not filed any response in this Court. Acc ording ly , we dismiss this a ppeal for want of prosec ution. See Tex. R. App. P . 37.3(b), 42.3( b)._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J . Woodfin J ones, Chief Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Rose Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: January

19, 2012

2
IN REPL.Y REFER TO: 

SIGLG-3-mab 

REF ID:A362jii0 

DLi 

~ 

A..'=i. '11fu.il/T OF 'IHL &i..iltiY., 

OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

18 June 1948 

SUBJECT: Patent Application, '.'iilliam. F. Friedman, et al, Serial No. 478,868 

TO: Chief, Army Security Agency 

Washington 25, D.C. 

Attn: Mr. staU:ffer 

Forwarded herewith is corwmmication from the U. S. 

Patent Office, together with references cited, regarding the 

subject application. 

FOR THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFPICER: 

l Incl 

Comm cited above 

w/2 ref 

~~.11M<~ Patent Counsel 

Legal Division. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
#### Charles, Appellant, vs. Godfrey, Respondent.

*September 13*

October *3, 1905.*

*Appeal and error: Bill of exceptions: Certificate of trial judge: Questions reviewed: Mechanics’ liens: Foreclosure: Costs: Statutes.*

*1.*A finding of fact cannot he reviewed on appeal where there is no certificate by the trial judge that the bill of exceptions contains all the evidence, nor that it contains so much of the evidence as is necessary to present the questions of law raised at the trial.

*2.*Subd. 7, sec. 2918, Stats. 1898, governing costs in equitable actions, differs from the same subdivision in the revision of 1878, in that it is amended by inserting the words “in whole or in part,” and hence, no abuse of discretion appearing, it is not error, in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, to limit the amount of taxable costs to be recovered.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Wal-worth county: E. B. BeldeN, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

*J. JEL.*Page, for the appellant.

Eor the respondent there was a brief by *William 0. Wheeler*and *James G.*Kestol, and oral argument by *Mr. Wheeler.*

WiNslow, J.

The plaintiff sued to foreclose a mechanic’s lien of $170 for the purchase price of a furnace placed by him in the defendant’s house, and the defendant counterclaimed on account of alleged defects in the installation and operation of the furnace. The court after trial found that the cold-air pipe was not properly placed, and allowed $25 damage upon the counterclaim therefor, and rendered the usual lien judgment for the plaintiff for $145, with interest,' *595hut limited the costs, exclusive of disbursements, to the sum ■of $25. The plaintiff appeals from the judgment and assigns as errors (1) the allowance of any sum upon the counter•claim, and (2) the limiting of the taxable costs.

Ueither assignment of error is well taken. There is no -certificate by the trial judge that the bill of exceptions contains all of the evidence, nor that it contains so much of the evidence as is necessary to present the questions of law raised at the trial. Hence we cannot review any finding of fact. *Daskam v.*Beemer, 64 Wis. 13, 24 N. W. 485.

The action is an equitable action. Sec. 3323, Stats. 1898. Prior -to the enactment of the Statutes of 1898, costs in an equitable action could be allowed or not, in the discretion of the court; but the court had no discretion to allow partial costs. By the last-named Statutes, however, subd. 7, sec. 2918, E. S. 1878, was amended by inserting the words “in whole or in part,” so that the circuit court now has authority to allow partial costs, in its discretion, in equitable actions. There is no special statute changing this rule in reference to actions to foreclose mechanics’ liens. Uo abuse of discretion appears in the present case.

*By the Oourt.*— Judgment affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHARLES H. GUY, IV, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-5012

)

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; THE )

UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF CHARLES H. )

GUY, IV; ANY AND ALL UNKNOWN )

PARTIES CLAIMING BY, THROUGH, )

UNDER, AND AGAINST THE HEREIN )

NAMED INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANT(S) )

WHO ARE NOT KNOWN TO BE DEAD )

OR ALIVE, WHETHER SAID )

UNKNOWN PARTIES MAY CLAIM AN )

INTEREST AS SPOUSES, HEIRS, )

DEVISEES, GRANTEES, OR OTHER )

CLAIMANTS; TENANT #1; TENANT #2; )

TENANT #3; AND TENANT #4 THE )

NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS TO )

ACCOUNT FOR PARTIES IN )

POSSESSION, )

)

Appellees. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed June 19, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; John A. Schaefer, Judge.

Richard J. Mockler of Stay in My Home, 

P.A., St. Petersburg (withdrew after initial 

briefing); Latasha Scott of Lord Scott, 

PLLC, Tampa (withdrew after initial 

briefing); Dineen P. Wasylik and Jared M. 
- 2 -

Krukar of DPW Legal, Tampa (substituted 

as counsels of record), for Appellant.

Kimberly S. Mello and Danielle M. Diaz of 

Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Tampa; and 

Michele L. Stocker of Greenberg Traurig, 

P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Wells 

Fargo Bank, N.A.

No appearance for remaining Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, KELLY, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
~- : .......... ~;.- -

-· 

REF 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT: Klll tor A ttacha Bag4ad 

- AS-CIC•IN 8096 Otr.r 9'32 

To: ASA-23 

FromASA Europe 

BRIEF SUMMARY: 

CLASSIFICA TION.N.UMB.ER: Had1ograma .l5A EUrope 

Date of Communication:4 June 1948 

Date of Basic Document:2B Kay 1948 

. Request received here tram Militarr Attache Bagdad ror 7 11111 

1ncend1ary bombs and 14 Kl4 grenades ror dse by State Dept. State Dept here does not recommen& to 1*• tore1gn service posts the use ot M1A1 units to destroy cryptomaterial. Consequently State Dept is contac;tng tor61gn service otficar in Begda4 to determine reason ~or 

requesting incendiary un1ts. Ko requests tor these units received b7 ~SA 

or D or I. 

Classifier: 

Typist: 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

FILE,_~d,S.~. 

'{'(\_\.~•-(.'(._ '~~~',. 

Routed to: 

Date of Classifyingt 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-14-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-CO~JFID§)JTIAQ . 

... 

---- ------

.. ~ .....
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                  5
<LEGEND>

     This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from the
Company's financial  statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference to
such financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,083,500 <F1>
<SECURITIES>                                       927,500 <F2>
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,794,600 <F3>
<ALLOWANCES>                                       306,800
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                             336,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                     182,900
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,819,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                            441,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                        750,000
<COMMON>                                         1,209,400
<OTHER-SE>                                         129,800 <F4>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,819,400
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 2,444,800
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      770,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   910,000 <F5>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   354,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,152,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (742,600)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (262,800)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (479,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                          (45,500)
<NET-INCOME>                                      (525,300)
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


<FN>
<F1> Includes  $551,300 of cash held in  segregated  accounts for  investors
     and $866,700  of cash held in segregated accounts related to servicing
     agreements and securitization transactions.
<F2> Includes  $494,600  of  actively  managed  fixed  maturity  securities  and
     $432,900 of interest-only securities.
<F3> Includes $12,797,200 of finance receivables - securitized.
<F4> Includes retained earnings of $268,900 and accumulated other
     comprehensive losses of $139,100.
<F5> Represents an impairment  charge of $515,700 to  write  down the  carrying
     value of interest-only securities and servicing rights and $394,300 of
     special charges.

</FN>


</TABLE>
exhibit101.htm


 



EXHIBIT 10.1


First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated 1994 Stock


 


and Incentive Plan of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated


 


This FIRST AMENDMENT TO SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED 1994 STOCK AND INCENTIVE PLAN OF TESSCO TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED, a Delaware corporation, further amends the Second Amended and Restated 1994 Stock and Incentive Plan of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, as hereinafter set forth (as amended hereby, the “Plan”).  Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Plan


 


1. The aggregate number of shares available for Award at any time pursuant to the Plan has been increased by 690,000 from 2,863,125 to 3,553,125, subject to further adjustment from time to time provided under the terms of the Plan, and to that end, Section 5a(i) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:


 


“Subject to any adjustment pursuant to Section 8 of this Plan the aggregate number of shares available with respect to which Awards may be granted under the Plan shall be 3,553,125.”


 


2. The date through which Awards may be granted pursuant to the Plan has been extended from July 22, 2014 to July 21, 2016 and to that end, Section 3(b) of the Second Amended and Restated 1994 Stock and Incentive Plan is amended to read in full as follows:


 


“(b)  TERMINATION.  No Award shall be granted under this Plan after July 21, 2016; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that any Award theretofore granted may be extended beyond such date unless expressly provided otherwise herein or the Award Agreement; PROVIDED FURTHER, to the extent set forth in Section 8 hereof, the authority of the Committee to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue or terminate any such award or to waive any conditions or restrictions with respect to any such Award and the authority of the Board of Directors to amend the Plan shall extend beyond such date.”


 


3. Section 9(c) of the Second Amended and Restated Stock and Incentive Plan is amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


(c)  ACCELERATION.  Except as otherwise provided hereunder, the Committee may in its discretion, accelerate the time in which an outstanding Award granted hereunder may be exercised.  With respect to Restricted Stock, in connection with the consummation of a public tender offer for all or any portion of the shares of the Company, or consummation of a merger or consolidation of the Company with another entity, the Committee, in its sole discretion, may shorten or eliminate the Restriction Period consistent with the best interests of the Company


 


The foregoing amendments to the Plan were approved by the Board of Directors and, where required, the shareholders of the Company in accordance with applicable law, effective as of July 21, 2011, and by order of the Board of Directors of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated, this First Amendment to Second Amended and Restated 1994 Stock and Incentive Plan of TESSCO Technologies Incorporated shall be appended to and become part of the Plan.
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 32.2

                          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                           18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of President Casinos, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ralph
J. Vaclavik, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Date: May 26, 2006                   /s/ Ralph J. Vaclavik
                                    ----------------------------
                                     Ralph J. Vaclavik
                                     Senior Vice President and
                                     Chief Financial Officer of
                                     President Casinos, Inc.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Ancillary R01 Telephone Review SEP.                    

*Date:*                         April 3, 2015.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Two Democracy Plaza, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Xiaodu Guo, Md, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, DEA, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 761, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-5452, (301) 594-4719,                         *guox@extra.niddk.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: March 4, 2015.

David Clary,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2015-05509 Filed 3-9-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4140-01-P