alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
•. .fff ... .. 

REF ID:A39729 

I 

•• BE- . 

Jlsmoranda To. Officer In Charge, 

Resaaroh and Development D1v.l.aion, 

Office ot.· the Chief Signal otticer. 

c 0 p y .. 

----

I 

• 

Aprll 11 1936 

Subject: ~atent Application, .Ser. No. 1014121 Filed lfarch. 23, 1936, 

.·Improvement in Cl'JPtogr&phs 

. Will1am F • Friedman and Frank B. ROll'l.ett 

·le· Refe1"8!1Ce is made to memorandum dated lo-J.5-3S directing 

the Jatelits Section to take ~ necess&1'1' action to invoke the "Three 

Year· R"ulf" 1mder proVisions .. of section 4894, R. s., in connection with 

the patent· application, above -idel;ltitied, acting in accordance w:Lth_procedure 1zd.t1ated by order ot the Chi.et Signal Officer on or about August 211 l93S. ·. 

2~ .··.In order to compq 1f.th the requirements in these •tters, 

it was~ ziecessar.r to prepare the patent application comprising specifica~QDJ . alai ms and drawizJga in Complete £~, then S8C1D."9 the tiling 

ot said ai;t;lication 1n the Patent ottice J ( 2) then prepare an appropriate 

assigD11181lt Testing title in the United States as prori.ded 'b1" Section b.89k. 

3. Having secured the fornal .tiling ot tbe patent application, 

al>ove idantuied, the necessar.r fOl"Dl&l assignment of' title in favor of the 

Uzd.ted S~tes as represented by: the Secretar.r of War has bem prepared, which 

assignment identifies the patent; application by its Serial Number and filing 

date ·.and title of invention, and. said assignment is now subml tted herad.th 

f'or tran.mf.ttal through channels f'or execution by Messrs. Friedman and Rowlett. . . . . 

· 4·. As socn as the assignment has been executed by :Messrs. Friednan 

and Rowlett and notarial.q acknowledged, said assignment should be returned to 

the JliL~s ··section f'or further mcesE17 action. · . 

/s/ Charles A. Rawe 

CHA.RIBS A. ROWE, 

Patents· Se~on, Signal Corps 

!Declassified and approv~d for release by NSA on 09-27-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 

~ : . ·.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND>
                      ALLBRITTON COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY 
                          FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
                       IN ACCORDANCE WITH ITEM 601(C)
                        OR REGULATIONS S-K AND S-B

                             (In thousands)

This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Retained Earnings for
the year ended September 30, 1996 and the Consolidated Balance
Sheet as of September 30, 1996 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such consolidated financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1,000
       
<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>            12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                                12,108
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                         30,604
<ALLOWANCES>                                           1,385
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      62,963
<PP&E>                                               117,201
<DEPRECIATION>                                        64,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       281,778
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 45,686
<BONDS>                                              402,993
<COMMON>                                                   1
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                          (172,393)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         281,778
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     155,573
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        107,689
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       1,100
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         752
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    35,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       14,805
<INCOME-TAX>                                           7,812
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    6,993
<DISCONTINUED>                                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        7,750
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                             543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                              0
        



</TABLE>
I I 

I 

.1 REF.ID:A41587,.. 

Mr. Johll Howard 

Burrougb8 AWas lhehim CoqJa.1\Y R~ae&l"Ch D1Vi810~ 

511 Il. BrOG4 S~ 

Ph1ladelp1-ia 23, Pannsyl'l/e.Dia 

Dear f·'.r· ~~= 

2 April 195~ 

· With J"eterence to the· msslon or the SUbcomla1ttee 

on Genenl .Purpoee FJ..ex1ble ~lca.l E~, tbe 

date or~ 4.7, 1954, inel.ua1ve, bi.a been prop04td tor 

the initial review ot the problem eCl.1frQnti08 the c0ll1Jlittee~ 

The meet1Qs will bfJ h!'.114 3.t the Ne.tl~l Secut'ity Ageney. -

Various emben ot the A&ert!JY' ~ cont:ribUt!l1$ con.id~~·· 

abl.1# •'°fa.ct to ~..Ji;,111.i s. ·d6tt\Ued p~ntation of aeveJ&l 

probJ;;IaS pert~t, to~~~ ot t!)e c~ttee e:nd !.ti@ . h*4 -trot yw can· ~:to be ;pre$~nt ~or t..'19 entire 1n1tf.&1 

conf'eience. · · · 

. \1111 Yt)U please sd".r~o Mr. Wl~ P .. h!~n, R!tecut1ve Se~~ of ·the Uat1om.1 Seeur!tv A.zenoy Se1ent1f'~ Mv~or.Y 

lkaJ'A ... wh$t'her you will· bo ®le to attend in order that bt .•Y int~ tra.vel orden !' · . · · 

S1ncereq, 

JOBN C. McPHm\SOB 

Ch&lftan ~ tbe Subeonadttee 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

/ 

/ 

/
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                              LTC PROPERTIES, INC.

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-3 No. 333-2444) and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-85252) of
LTC Properties, Inc. of our report dated January 24, 2003 with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedules of LTC Properties, Inc.,
included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Los Angeles, California

March 28, 2003
II 

117TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2025 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve access to innovative new medical devices furnished to individuals with end stage renal 

disease under part B of the Medicare program by establishing a new 

device add-on payment adjustment under such part. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 10, 2021 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Ms. SINEMA, Mrs. HYDE-SMITH, and Mr. CARPER) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to improve 

access to innovative new medical devices furnished to 

individuals with end stage renal disease under part B 

of the Medicare program by establishing a new device 

add-on payment adjustment under such part. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Patient Access to 

5 ESRD New Innovative Devices Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 Congress finds the following: 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2025 IS

1 (1) There are approximately 400,000 Medicare 

2 beneficiaries with end-stage renal disease, making up 

3 1 percent of the Medicare population but accounting 

4 for approximately 7 percent of all Medicare spend5 ing. 

6 (2) Expected remaining lifetime for dialysis pa7 tients under 80 years old is one-third as long as 

8 their counterparts without ESRD, and for dialysis 

9 patients over 80 years old, it is one-half as long as 

10 that of their counterparts without ESRD. 

11 (3) On average, hemodialysis patients are hos12 pitalized nearly twice per year and about 30 percent 

13 have an unplanned rehospitalization within the 30 

14 days following discharge, contributing to high costs 

15 for treating ESRD Medicare beneficiaries. 

16 (4) There is a lack of innovative new devices for 

17 ESRD Medicare beneficiaries, in part because of the 

18 lack of reimbursement incentives for novel devices. 

19 SEC. 3. INCREASING PATIENT ACCESS TO INNOVATIVE DE20 VICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ESRD. 

21 The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall 

22 provide, and may implement by program instruction or 

23 otherwise— 

24 (1) a 3-year temporary add-on payment adjust25 ment under section 1881(b)(14) of the Social SecuVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:02 Jun 23, 2021 Jkt 019200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S2025.IS S2025

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 2025 IS

1 rity Act (42 U.S. 1395rr(b)(14)) for a new medical 

2 device approved by the Food and Drug Administra3 tion under section 513(f)(2) of the Federal Food, 

4 Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360c) on or 

5 after January 1, 2020, that is furnished to a bene6 ficiary for the diagnosis, treatment, or management 

7 of end stage renal disease; and 

8 (2) for such adjustment to be implemented in 

9 a nonbudget neutral manner under such section 

10 1881(b)(14). 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42PROD with BILLS
From: Nick Hutson/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Sharon Nizich/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc : Keith Barnett/RTP/USEPA/US@EP A, Robert J Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 1 1/29/2011 08:26 AM

Subject: HCl control using SDA /FF

Sharon,

See the attached spreadsheet. I extracted the data from the 2010 utility ICR to just show the

performance of spray dryer absorber (SDA) + fabric filter (FF) for HCl control.

As expected, the performance was VERY good ... ranged from 95

- nearly 100%.

Actually on one res ult was 95% ... the rest were 99.5+% .... the average control (from coal

- to

stack) was 99.8%.

(See attached file: 2010 Utility ICR

- HCl control_SDA+FF.xlsx)

Thanks,

Nick

Nick Hutson, PhD

Energy Strategies Group

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards U. S. Environmental Protection Agency

109 T. W. Alexander Drive (D243

- 01)

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

tel: (919) 541

- 2968

email: hutson.nick@epa.gov
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,424,211
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   334,513
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      81,057,796
<DEPRECIATION>                            (43,198,569)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              47,201,379
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                     58,973,477
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                47,201,379
<SALES>                                     12,510,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            12,689,462
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             9,535,894
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,950,759
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (797,191)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (797,191)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
·,· 

... 

•' 

..... . REF ID:A66798 

4._-<_~/ : .. . ·_ I S-1!t!_:~~~:· , - · -9 Pebruary 19'5 

SECBET .~ial ·Aaa1atiat (Mr_. l'r1e4maD) · Vice Director . · ' · .· 

·(D 1Ull) . 

DD/COMSEC 

. • I I ~ I 

Release' of Cr;n>tognphic Information to Sri.t .. rlani :. · 

. . . 

l. In accordance with. 70UJ" re~st that you be Wornied. rega~ &11 

action• pertaining to the releue ot cryptogr.aphic intonation to foreign nat1o~. 

the following intonation is torward.ed: · 

a~ i.ttera trom th9 ·A1ai~ 1Jil1ta17 Attache, ·Switaerland·, arid trom 

·the ·MU1tar.r and Air Attache to the. Aa&istant- C~et ot Statt, 0-2, indicate that 

the Swiss have expressed inte:rest. in "Automatic Code ··EquiJ1118nt" but it is not 

clear whether the Swiss interest is in en~ryption devices or in equipment tor 

coding inf oration to facilitate ts-ansinies~on. The correspomence found ite - way t~ NSA•062 and ·thence to COMSEC tor interpretation am guidance. A. Comment . 

Ho. 2 to NSA-o62 :lidicatea that insutticient intoratton is proV1d*i to determine 

the nature ot Swiss intere:,t, suggests that.exploratory conversations with Sw:l.es 

.representative$ might. clarUy the contusion~ 4nd .recommen.d:s t~t the G-2 :uaieon 

otticer be advised acc~ingly. · ,. · 

.... · 

. ' . 

. ' ' 

. ' ., 

·, 

.· 

. P~· I. lllDBLID 

'~' USU'. 

·Depit7 Director . 

•' • o r I Co 11m •' cat1osa1 Sec\\r1 t7 

... 

I • _. ' o .. -., 

' . 

. . . 

. '· 

~ I I ; ' 

' . 

~ . 

. . .. . 

. ' 

. ' I '1 "'IO 'o o 

.. - __:_, - - ,....:_ ~ ~· .. :=.:..----= . . @i -·· ·'(-,...,,·-·;.r ::; . , .. '. • ·.-.. ,1 .. _:-·.'--;sc' 1

<:r 1 A ..... . .. . :::-.::-_:::....- - -::::-1 --: _,... t . '-.\ -- l,.. • • 

.. .. .--: 

: . ~ ·~ . 

.. · . 

• ;· -: t 

. ~ ~ -. 

. :Declassi.fi ~d a~d approved for release by NSA ·o~ 10-31-2013 ' ' ' ' • .- I .1o Q ' 

pursuant.to E .o. 1352a 

'. ··~ .
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dreyers Grand Ice Cream, Inc.
(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 29, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Timothy F. Kahn, Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



| | /s/ Timothy F. KahnT. Gary Rogers
Timothy F. Kahn
Vice President of Finance and Administration
  and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2002
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 6.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


    In connection with the annual report of ID Biomedical Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Richard Bear, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated:  May 19, 2004

                                             By: /s/ RICHARD BEAR
                                                 -------------------------------
                                             Name:   Richard Bear
                                             Title:  Principal Financial Officer
## 3 Rhinelander/Oneid a Count yAirpor t Rober t G . Heck , Commissio n Chai r Josep h 3 . Brauer , Directo r 

### www.fly-i'hi.or g Januarys , 201 2

" • , j U . S . Departmen t o f Transportatio n Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s Essentia l Ai rServic e Divisio n 120 0 Ne wJerseyAvenue , S E ^" ' Washington , D

C 2059 0 Attn : Mr . Denni s J . DeVany , Chie f Essentia l Ai rServic e Divisio n RE : Docke t OST-2011-010 9 Rhinelander , Wisconsi n Dea rMr . DeVany , We wis h t o than k

Grea t Lake s Airlin e fo rthei rproposa l t o provid e essentia l ai r transportatio n t o Rhinelande rWisconsin . Th e communit yhas a n excellen t histor ywit h Great Lake s Airline s datin g bac k t o Februar y1990 . The yprovide d convenien t fligh t schedule s t o mee t th e demand s o f th e travelin g public . Great Lake s Airline s i s ver yfamilia rwit h th e Rhinelande r marke t an d pea k

seaso n trave l t o ou rresorts , camps , an d secon d hom e owners durin g th e summe rmonths . Th e coordinatio n o f electroni ccommunication s wit h Delt a Airline s i s a plu s sinc e w e have man ySKYMILE S traveler s i n surroundin g area . We concu rwit h Great Lake s thre e roun d trip s pe rdaydurin g of f pea k month s wit h a n increase d flight schedul e durin g ou rpea k summe rmonth s t o b e determjne d byth e airlin e t o mee t th e histori ctraffi cdemands . Again , w e loo k forwar d t o workin g wit h Great Lake s Airline s i n th e future . Sincerel y Rober t G . Hec k - Airpor t Chai r Cc : Michae l Matthews , Airpor t Commissio n Rhlnelander/Oneid a Count yAirpor t 337 5 Airpor t Roa d Rhinelander , W I 5450 1 OfTice : 715-365-341 6 Fa x-365-343 9 Email : rhIarpt@newnorth.ne t
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 219 

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for abortions, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 21, 2015 

Mr. CASEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the expenditure of Federal funds for abortions, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Hyde Amendment 

5 Codification Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING FEDERALLY FUNDED ABORTIONS. 

7 Title 1 of the United States Code is amended by add8 ing at the end the following new chapter: 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 219 IS

1 ‘‘CHAPTER 4—PROHIBITING FEDERALLY 

2 FUNDED ABORTIONS 

3 ‘‘SEC. 301. PROHIBITION ON FUNDING FOR ABORTIONS. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No funds authorized or appro5 priated by Federal law, and none of the funds in any trust 

6 fund to which funds are authorized or appropriated by 

7 Federal law, shall be expended for any abortion. 

8 ‘‘(b) HEALTH BENEFITS COVERAGE.—No funds au9 thorized or appropriated by Federal law, and none of the 

10 funds in any trust fund to which funds are authorized or 

11 appropriated by Federal law, shall be expended for health 

12 benefits coverage that includes coverage of abortion. 

13 ‘‘SEC. 302. TREATMENT OF ABORTIONS RELATED TO RAPE, 

14 INCEST, OR PRESERVING THE LIFE OF THE 

15 MOTHER. 

16 ‘‘The limitations established in sections 301 shall not 

17 apply to an abortion— 

18 ‘‘(1) if the pregnancy is the result of an act of 

19 rape or incest; or 

20 ‘‘(2) in the case where a woman suffers from a 

21 physical disorder, physical injury, or physical illness, 

22 including a life-endangering physical condition 

23 caused by or arising from the pregnancy itself, that 

24 would, as certified by a physician, place the woman 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

•S 219 IS

1 in danger of death unless an abortion is per2 formed.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Federal Register: September 16, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 179)]
[Notices]               
[Page 56653]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr16se10-117]                         

[[Page 56653]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

 
Suspension of Preparation of Environmental Impact Statement for 
the George Bush Intercontinental Airport, Houston, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice suspending preparation of the Environmental Impact 
Statement (EIS) for the George Bush Intercontinental Airport (IAH).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise federal, state, and 
local government agencies and the public that the FAA has suspended 
preparation of the EIS for the proposed airport improvements at IAH. 
The Houston Airport System (HAS), the sponsor of the proposed project, 
has advised the FAA that significant changes in the aviation industry 
and at IAH warrant suspension of the on-going EIS in order to 
reevaluate development needs for the airport. HAS has determined that 
reevaluation of the Airport Master Plan (AMP) assumptions will provide 
the most current and reliable information on which to base decisions 
regarding future proposals for airport development.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DOT/FAA, Southwest Region, Mr. Paul 
Blackford, ASW-650, 2601 Meacham Boulevard, Fort Worth, TX 76137, (817) 
222-5607, or e-mail at paul.blackford@faa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 9, 2009, the FAA issued a Notice of 
Intent in the Federal Register (74 FR 16255-16256) to prepare an EIS 
for proposed airfield improvements at IAH. The purpose of these 
proposed improvements is to increase airfield capacity and to reduce 
projected delays. Based on the results of the AMP, the airfield 
improvements being analyzed in the EIS included the proposed 
construction of additional runway(s) at IAH. Preparation of the EIS was 
undertaken by the FAA in accordance with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969, as amended.
    The FAA received a letter from HAS dated July 30, 2010 requesting 
that preparation of the EIS be delayed. Based on its letter, HAS 
believes that additional planning work is necessary to ensure that the 
assumptions used in the AMP remain valid. The letter points to the 
impacts of the potential United-Continental merger, the economic 
downturn, potential changes to aircraft fleet mix, and the need to 
update the existing terminal concept as reasons justifying their 
request to conduct additional planning. The FAA will issue another 
Federal Register notice when it determines that preparation of the EIS 
should resume.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX on September 3, 2010.
D. Cameron Bryan,
Acting Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-22869 Filed 9-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M
```