alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### VonDemHagen, Rebecca

From: Bruce Alan Karas <brkaras@coca-cola.com>

Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2014 10:41 AM

To: VonDemHagen, Rebecca

Cc: Newberg, Cindy; Godwin, Dave

Subject: Additional information regarding, Docket ID Number EPA–HQ–OAR–2014–0198

Attachments: Additional Coca-Cola Comme nts-EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0198.pdf

In response to your recent request, the attached letter provides additional information regarding the U.S. Environmental

Protection Agency (EPA) notice of proposed rulemaking (NOPR) about changes to the listing status for certain substitutes

under the SNAP program. Coca

‐ Cola believes the SNAP program is an effective vehicle to reduce f

‐ gas atmospheric

pollutants and address climate protection.

The rulemaking proposes a singular transition date of January 1, 2016 to set HFC

‐ 134a and other HFC refrigerant blends

as unacceptable for new stand

‐ alone retail food refrigeration and new vending machines because acceptable

alternatives exist [79 Federal Register 46126 (August 6, 2014), to amend 40 C.F.R. Part 82]. However, these acceptable

alternatives (R744, R717, R600a, R290, R441a) currently do not have essential system components commercially

available in all refrigerating capacities to establish efficient equipment for the full range of equipment sizes. The chart

of Table 1 in the attached letter, differentiates when the various sizes are expected to be achieved and available for

commercial application. Understand that even when the appropriate components become commercially available, time

must still be allocated to develop the new refrigeration system for the appliance, test and optimize it, secure safety

certification, and make arrangements for production. Coca

‐ Cola recommends that the EPA refine the timetable of the

NOPR to reflect what can be realistically achieved as expressed below in this table.

Thank you for soliciting our input. Do not hesitate to request greater detail, if needed.

Regards,

Bruce Karas

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information t hat is confidential, privileged and

exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notifi ed that any printing, copying,

dissemination, distribution, disclosure or forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this c ommunication in error, please contact the

sender immediately and delete it from your system. Thank You.2
: . ' COPY 

Div. 53 

REF IDoof6i272719-

260 Paper lfo. 25 

DEP l!RTI:JEKT OF COIJI\IJERCE 

United States Patent Office 

Y!ashington 

Please find belovr a connnunication f': ·.,m the E:XiiLiilJER in 

charge of this application . TODD/ A Conway P. Coe 

Co:rmnissioner of Pa tents 

COPY 

Tiilliam D. Hall 

Patents Section 

Signal Co~s 

Munitions Bldg. 

i:<1ailed Jan. 31, 1942 

Applicant: William F. Friedman. 

Ser. No. 682,096 

Filed July 25, 1933 

i'lar Dept., Wash., D.C. For CRYPTOGRAPHIC SYSTEM 

H.esponsive to amendment of Aug. 29, 1941. 

Claims in the case are 1-19, 12, 14-40. The 

:-:itatus of claims 1-10, 12, u.-39 is thc:.t given in the 

action of Nov. 1, 1938. 

The amendment filed Aug. 29, 1941 wherein claim 

40 (renumbe:~ed from 35 so that the numbering may 

comply '-d.th Rule 73) is non-responsive since the remarks, 

required by Order 2801, Feb. 20, 1923, as applied 

to said claim 40 are wholly inadequate. The pertinent 

part of the order reads; 

"If nev1 claims are inserted without argument-------

the claims vrill not be allowed. The reasons must be of 

record.n 

Examiner. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 09-13-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information (prepared in accordance 
with accounting principles generally accepted in Canada) extracted from the 
accounting records of Mitel Corporation and included in the Consolidated
Statements of Income for the nine months ended December 25, 1998 and the 
Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 25, 1998 and is qualified in its 
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> CANADIAN DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-26-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-25-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.55029<F1>
<CASH>                                          35,707
<SECURITIES>                                    59,296
<RECEIVABLES>                                  307,026
<ALLOWANCES>                                    13,450
<INVENTORY>                                    217,592
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               668,037
<PP&E>                                         918,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                 369,278
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,334,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          304,702
<BONDS>                                        271,178
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     37,175
<COMMON>                                       331,131
<OTHER-SE>                                     338,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,334,044
<SALES>                                      1,032,764
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,032,764
<CGS>                                          517,313
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  517,313
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               430,057
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              30,942
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 58,732
<INCOME-TAX>                                    13,531
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             45,201
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    45,201
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .37<F3>
<FN>
<F1>The foreign exchange rate of 1.550291 should be used to translate the
balance sheet items from Canadian Dollars (figures above) to U.S. Dollars.
The nine month moving average foreign exchange rate of 1.498157 should be
used to translate the income statement items from Canadian Dollars
(figures above) to U.S. Dollars.
<F2>The figure quoted is EPS-Basic under Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles.
<F3>The figure quoted is EPS-Fully Diluted under Canadian Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Trinity Biotech plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin Tansley, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ KEVIN TANSLEY*     
|Kevin Tansley          
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|March 25, 2015         



|* | The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except
to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by Trinity Biotech plc for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
\.~ REF ID:A72900 

Office Memorandum · UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT 

TO : COLONEL BIDWELL DATE. 20 August 1954 

FRO~ : SPECIAL S!UDIES DIVISION 

SUBJECT: Cooments on "Codes and Ciphers,a pp. 136-159. 

1. The accomplishments in this field between World War I and Pearl Harbor 

are among the brightest aspects or military intelligence in the U. S. Arr:u. Iet 

with all these accomplishments the war was opened with the most destructive 

surprise in our history. Clear]Jr this was not due to a failure of Signal Corps 

intelligence. The failure will be found elsewhere. 

2. Detailed comments: 

p. 139. Delete the word "consequential.n 

p. 144~ footnote. Here you infer that President Hoover might have been the 

one to cause Mr. Stimson to talce the a<*.ion he did. This is certainly not good 

history and the inference should be deleted unless you can show that President 

Hoover directed Mr. stJ.mSon to take such action. \fr. Hoover is still living and 

his memory might suffice to get the answer. However, it is vecy doubt£ul because 

or the enormous responsibilities that he has had as well as because or his age. 

Your note is particul.arly bad inasmuch as you use evidence or his attitude while 

in charge or European relief as an indication of his probable reaction in this 

Jll&tter. The footnote should be changed. l ' r 

.X.,,yW_,r;J,,.1 ,./.., 

p. 145, 6th line from bottom. Delete the word "inexpedient.a 

p. 150. It is interesting to note that when General 'Malm Craig became Chier 

or Starr General Uaugborne soon became Chief Signal ,Officer. He had been Chief 

Signal Of'ficer or the I AraJy Corps in France while General Craig was Chief or staff. 

I 

J' 

" 

' .... "' -

• <I 

He he.d also twice served General Craig a.s departmental or corps area Signal officer. ~ ,,, 

I am quite sure ·that this close association was important in enabling General. :l i r 

Maugborne to secure better support for Signal intelligence, a subject which had > ' 

long been something more than a hobby with him. 

p. 151, line 14 from top. Spelling of •hence• 

' , 

- 1 I •l 

. 

P. 11. ROBINETT 

Chief, Special Studies Division 

J' 

. _, , 

\
AAM-10-318-E 

 Exemption No. 10093 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2010-0682 

Ms. Jamie Gallagher 

Pacific Crest Aviation, Inc. 

37730 Sky Canyon Road 

Murrieta, CA 92563 

Dear Ms. Gallagher: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated June 22, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Pacific Crest Aviation, Inc. (Pacific Crest Aviation), for an exemption from part 120 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow 

Pacific Crest Aviation which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its 

safety-sensitive employees under one testing program. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Pacific Crest Aviation. 

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two testing programs into 

one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of safety to that 

provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was unnecessary to burden 

the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs. 
2 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed grant of 

exemption; 

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Pacific Crest Aviation, Inc., an exemption from part 120 to 

the extent necessary to allow Pacific Crest Aviation, which is operating under separate parts 

of the regulations, to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one testing program, subject 

to the conditions and limitations described below. 

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Pacific Crest Aviation are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations at 

all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91. 

 2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the 

 Pacific Crest Aviation part 135 operation, not under part 91. 

This exemption terminates on July 31, 2012, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Dr. James R. Fraiser 

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon 

Enclosure
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [File No. 500-1]

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Black Sea Metals, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended May 31, 2012.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of GigaBeam Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2007.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Safe Technologies International, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended December 31, 2010.

It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of Whitemark Homes, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the period ended September 30, 2012.

                    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the protection of                           ( print page 12690)                        investors require a suspension of trading in the securities of the above-listed companies.                

Therefore, it is ordered, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended for the period from 9:30 a.m. EST on March 5, 2015, through 11:59 p.m. EDT on March 18, 2015.

By the Commission.

Jill M. Peterson,

Assistant Secretary

[FR Doc. 2015-05515 Filed 3-6-15; 11:15 am]

 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: May 12, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Ray Saracino, EPA Region 9

SUBJECT: February 18, 2015, Meeting with Guam EPA Regarding Proposed Clean Power 

Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendee listed below on February 18, 2015 to 

discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014 and published in the Federal Register on 

June 18, 2014.

ATTENDEES

External Stakeholders

Conchita San Nicolas Taitano

EPA 

Michael Mann

Ray Saracino
Exhibit 10.97

                              ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT

      This ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT ("Assignment") is made this 30th day of
September, 2004 by and among AJG FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., a Delaware
corporation ("AJG"), and U.S. ENERGY BIOGAS CORP., a Delaware corporation (the
"Company").

      WHEREAS, the Company issued a Second Amended and Restated Subordinated
Note dated April 8, 2004 (the "Subordinated Note") to AJG; and

      WHEREAS, pursuant to a Purchase Agreement dated September 30, 2004 between
AJG and the Company (the "Purchase Agreement"), AJG desires to sell and assign
the Subordinated Note to the Company and the Company desires to purchase the
Subordinated Note.

      NOW THERFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and
valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows;

      1.    Any capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined, shall
            have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Purchase Agreement.

      2.    AJG hereby sells, assigns and transfers to the Company, its
            successors and assigns, all right, title and interest of AJG in, to
            and under the Subordinated Note.

      3.    The Company accepts assignment of the Subordinated Note and agrees
            to pay or has paid the Purchase Price to AJG.

      4.    The parties agree to duly execute and deliver such further
            instruments or documents or take such further action as the other
            may request in writing in order to obtain the full benefit of this
            Assignment and the rights granted herein.

      5.    This Assignment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
            with the laws of the state of Delaware.

      6.    This assignment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of
            each party hereto, its successors and permitted assigns. This
            assignment is not intended to create any third-party beneficiary
            rights in any person not a party to this Assignment.

<PAGE>

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the
day and year first written above.

                                        AJG FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

                                        By:____________________________

                                        Title:_________________________


                                        U.S. ENERGY BIOGAS CORP.

                                        By:____________________________

                                        Title:_________________________
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of
Biomet, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge on the
date hereof:

(a)  The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended
     February 29, 2004 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
     Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)  Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

					/s/  Dane A. Miller
					Dane A. Miller, Ph.D.
					President and Chief Executive Officer

					/s/  Gregory D. Hartman
					Gregory D. Hartman
					Senior Vice President - Finance
					and Chief Financial Officer
April 14, 2004


The foregoing certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q and shall not be deemed to be
considered filed as part of the Form 10-Q.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          10,950
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,243
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,541)
<INVENTORY>                                     85,708
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               201,123
<PP&E>                                         136,211
<DEPRECIATION>                                  87,700
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 301,213
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          176,519
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           13,515
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,030
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,545
<SALES>                                        164,066
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               164,066
<CGS>                                          118,183
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,311
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (34)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,036
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (23,247)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       354
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,601)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,601)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.75)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.75)


</TABLE>