alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
........ --~-----... : &;?~-=----~---- ------- .. .:.- -

•• 

Colonel Otis ::t~ S&dtler .. Head4uarters. A1!'fl7 Ground.For~•·~ 

War College. VaahiDgt_on,, D. C. 

Dear Otis: 

· I vant to thank J'OU veJ!7 much tor the · · 

excellent photograph 7ou·eent.m.e the.other da7 

and ~he autographed •tter thereon. 

Your picture vill occun ~ J as nent place 

1D IQ' g&lle17. . , ·· . 

-~. I 

~ .. ' 

·-~ 

l 

-~ 

With cordial greetings. I •• 

'· 

William F. 'Friedman. · 

: pprov~d for Relea$'e by NSA on 04-01-2014 pursuant to E. 0 .. 

13526:' 

,• 

\ 

I 

. \ 

. . \ 

. \ 

I " ·~ 

\ 

\ 

\ 

\ 

\ 

' 

' \ 

· .. 

' " 

\ 

\
**EXHIBIT
      23.1**








CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTING FIRM




We
      have
      issued our report dated March 30, 2007, accompanying the consolidated
      balance sheet of ISCO International Inc. and subsidiaries as of
      December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of
      operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years then
      ended included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
      December 31, 2006. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of
      said report in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File numbers: 333-136612,
      333-129339, 333-109127, 333-111242, 333-53338 and 333-53646) and Form S-8 (File
      numbers: 333-136613, 333-126623, 333-115967, 333-39342, 333-64818, 333-43164
      and
      333-49268).






Chicago,
              IllinoisDate: March
              30, 2007
            By:
            /s/ GRANT
              THORNTON LLP
exv10w20






Exhibit 10.20




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is entered into as of May
20th, 2005, by and between CORNERSTONE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD., an Anguilla company
(“Cornerstone”), and VINTAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“Vintage”).



RECITALS:




     A. Cornerstone and Vintage are parties to that certain Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
July 20, 2004 (the “Agreement”);



     B. The parties desire to amend certain provisions of the Agreement.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual agreements herein contained, the
parties hereby agree as follows:



     SECTION 1. DEFINED TERMS. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment, unless otherwise
defined herein, shall have the meanings given such terms in the Agreement.



     SECTION 2. RECITALS. The recitals set forth above are incorporated herein by
reference, as if fully restated herein.



     SECTION 3. STATUS OF AGREEMENT. The Agreement, as amended, hereby remains in full
force and effect, and, except to the extent expressly set forth in this Amendment, shall not be
deemed waived, modified, superseded or otherwise affected in any respect.



     SECTION 4. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT. Section 3.02(ii) is amended by replacing “January
15, 2005” with “August 1, 2005,” and Section 3.02(iii) is amended by replacing “July 15, 2005,”
with “November 1, 2005.”



     SECTION 5. COUNTERPARTS. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts,
each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the
same instrument.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of date first above
written.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	CORNERSTONE PHARMACEUTICALS
LTD.	 	 	 	VINTAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Craig A. Collard
	 	 	 	By:
	 	/s/ William S. Propst, Jr.
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Name:

	 	Craig A. Collard
	 	 	 	Name:
	 	William S. Propst, Jr.
	Its:

	 	CEO
	 	 	 	Its:
	 	President
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1923 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1923

   To amend titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act to provide 
  certain individuals with information on employment support services.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 4, 2015

    Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Coats, Mr. Lankford, and Mr. Blunt) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act to provide 
  certain individuals with information on employment support services.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Promoting Opportunity for Disability 
Benefit Applicants Act''.

SEC. 2. PROVIDING INFORMATION ON PUBLIC OR PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT SUPPORT 
              SERVICES.

    (a) Amendment to Title II.--Title II of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 401 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 218 the 
following:

``SEC. 219. INFORMATION ON EMPLOYMENT SUPPORT SERVICES.

    ``The Commissioner of Social Security may provide individuals who 
are denied benefits under this title based on an adverse determination 
of disability information on appropriate public or private entities 
that provide employment services, vocational rehabilitation services, 
or other support services.''.
    (b) Amendment to Title XVI.--Section 1615 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
1382d) is amended by inserting after subsection (a) the following:
    ``(b) The Commissioner of Social Security may provide individuals 
who are denied benefits under this title based on an adverse 
determination of disability information on appropriate public or 
private entities that provide employment services, vocational 
rehabilitation services, or other support services.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply with respect to applications for monthly benefits filed on 
or after the date that is 180 days after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
~'' REF ID:A7003~ 

HEADQUARTERS ' 

ARMY SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

18 Januar7 1946 

Lt. Colonel C~rles H. Hiser, 0354978 

Signal Security Detachment D 

HQ. USFET (MAIN) APO 757, e/o Postmaster 

New York, New York 

Dear Charlie: 

I am ver7 much indebted to you for yo'Ul'" nice letter 

of 2 December and for the enclosure of the 35 millimeter film~ I think it will suit ll1'1 purposes very well. 

By this time• no doubt• ·Ear le has brought back a ~ 

first-hand report on everything in Washington and I vill 

not attempt to add anything o.r my own at the moment. I 

know a bit about what some of your. troubles are like due 

to shortages or personnel and I won't undertake to tell 

you our own headaches in the same line. 

I don't knov what living conditions are like there. 

but I imagine that you could use a log fire or two nov 

and then. 

Did you have as nice a Christmas as you anticipated 

in 7our letter. I hope 7ou did, a11d I want to take this 

opportunity to vish you and all the rest the best of 

everything for the coming 7ear. 

'WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAN 

Director of 

Communicstions Research 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
REF_-J,!).jJl-7~ /VJ_/ j/ 

17 ks r-£r (ff AIN} 

Rrf'o 75 7 i P~ P.)"." .,v:,.,.-: 

:i. ~ f-J 
REF ID:A70035 

• •
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOEL DAVID JOSEPH,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

KRAFT HEINZ FOODS COMPANY, INC.; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 16

- 55742

D.C. No. 2:15

- cv

- 09399

- AB

- E

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California Andre Birotte, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 24 , 2017 **

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and SILVERMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

Joel David Joseph appeals pro se from district court’s judgment dismissing

his diversity action alleging state law claims arising out his purchase of cashew

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Joseph’s request for oral argument, set forth in his reply brief, is denied. 

# FILED

MAY 31 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COUR T OF APPEALS2 16

- 55742

products without country of origin markings . We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We revi ew de no vo a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6)

.

Hinojos v. Kohl’

s Corp. , 718 F.3d 1098, 1103 (9th Cir. 2013) . We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Joseph’s claims under California’s

Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”) bec ause Joseph failed to allege facts sufficient

to show that he relied on the abse nce of a country of origin marking on defendants’

cashew products in making his purchases. See Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17204

(standing under the UCL requires plaintiff’s injury to occur “as a result of”

defendant’s misconduct); Kwikset Corp. v. Super

. C t. , 246 P.3d 877, 88 5

- 88 (Cal.

2011) (to establish standing to bring a UCL claim, a plaintiff must allege economic

injury and reliance on defendant’s alleged misrepresentation )

.

We do not consid er matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents and facts not p resented to the district court.

See United States v. Elias

, 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Documents or facts

not presented to the district court are not part of the record on appeal.”).

AFFIRMED.
SetupPLEASE DO NOT CHANGE ANYTHING HEREUser ChoicesFPindex2AEO 2000 - Reference CaseAEO 2000 - Reference CaseStartYear2006Projection TrendBaseOpt1Baseline (SEER=10)Elec ElecElecStdOpt430% Impr. (SEER=13)cent/kWh cent/kWh cent/kWhPriceOpt 10=ARI mean, 1=Rev.Engr.19988.05 1.0019988.05System Opt 1Packaged System19997.92 0.9820007.86CB 0 20007.86 0.9820107.3920017.74 0.9620207.28Multi-Run Options20027.63 0.9520307.28StdOptBegin320037.59 0.942000-2030StdOptEnd520047.56 0.94Growth -0.3%20057.47 0.93Comm./Resid. Choice2<-This cell is dynamically defined when20067.48 0.93user updates the % comm. and % resid.20077.48 0.93% Shipment Breakdown(Don’t change assumptions here)20087.46 0.93Commercial1 10.0% 20097.37 0.92Residential2 90.0% 20107.39 0.92Base Manuf. Cost$59320117.33 0.91Base Equipment Price$1,43920127.30 0.91Base Opt Manuf. Cost$59320137.29 0.91Base Opt Equipment Price$1,43920147.32 0.91Std Opt Manuf. Cost$81820157.33 0.91Std Opt Equipment Price$1,87520167.32 0.91System Installation Price$2,16020177.32 0.9120187.32 0.91value user use 20197.29 0.91used value default 20207.28 0.90Manufacturer Markup123% 0% 120217.28 0.90Distributor Markup109% 0% 120227.28 0.90Dealer Markup127% 0% 120237.28 0.90Builder Markup109% 0% 120247.28 0.90Sales Tax104% 0% 120257.28 0.90Std. Level20267.28 0.90Std Opt Price Multiplier100% 0% 1020277.28 0.90108% 0% 1120287.28 0.90113% 0% 1220297.28 0.90138% 0% 1320307.28 0.90174% 0% 14186% 0% 15186% 0% 16Page 1
REF ID:A363539 

Qf.t:ico 0£ the chiefs:.~ Ot.t'icer 

Signal tacurity Liv!..Bion 

Patent hpplicat.ion 

Legal f.'!.vlsion 72416 

Your piater.t applica.t.ion entitled "AUthcnt.!.catin:J r:.evicen 'WaB :t!led 

in the u.r. Patent ottiee on 2S ~u.gust., 1944 and as.signed eer:al number $$1.,,172'. 

1ta~toid J.. Mel!.lhannon 

.UU.jor1 ~)ignal Corps 

Actin.:; ?at.ents tt !nv$llf,iona (OW'l&el. 

Legal .t!viaion 

@<pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-29-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352a
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.0

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc.

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (No.
333-75174, 333-52672, 333-96411, 333-78451, 333-09417, 033-73212) on Form S-8 of
Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report
dated March 6, 2002, except as to Note N to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, which is as of March 25, 2002, relating to the Consolidated Balance
Sheets of Fidelity Information Solutions, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December
31, 2001 and 2000 and the related Consolidated Statements of Operations,
Stockholders' Equity and Cash Flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2001, which report appears in the December 31, 2001
annual report on Form 10-K of Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc. and
subsidiaries.

As discussed in Note L to the Consolidated Financial Statements, effective
July 1, 2001, Fidelity National Information Solutions, Inc. adopted provisions
of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No. 141, "Business
Combinations," and certain provisions of SFAS no. 142, as required for goodwill
and intangible assets resulting from business combinations consummated after
June 30, 2001.


KPMG LLP
Los Angeles, California
March 29, 2002
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas N. Hendrickson, Chief Executive Officer of CPAC, Inc., hereby certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CPAC, Inc.
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based upon such evaluation; and
c)  disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
5.     The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: November 13, 2003 | /s/ Thomas N. Hendrickson
Thomas N. Hendrickson
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------





25



---
USCIB: 29 .lS/6 

25 May 1954 

'l'OP BfienE'f EO 3.3(h) (2) 

PL S6~36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: UKUSAI \ 

'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--

1. The following tentative record of deci.si.on on the above subject, 

as considered at the 103rd Meeting of' USCIB, 14\.May 1954, is forwarded 

for the purpose of' guiding the deliberations of \the Working Committee: 

DECISION: (14 May 1954) USCIB agreed: 

(a) Not to accept the basic report by the Ad\ Hoc Committee as 

presented. Instead, it was agreed to appoint a new committee, under the 

chairmanship of Mr. Frank Raven, which will: 

(1) Consider proposed agenda items "a" through "d" and, if 

agreement is reached on these items, to proceed with 

consideration of items "e" and 11f 11 • If agreement is not 

reached on items "a" through 11d11 , present divergent views 

to USCIB for resolution at a special meeting. 

(2} Submit recommendations to USCIB in sufficient time to 

pennit consideration at the regular June. meeting (11 June), 

with a view to having approved U.S. position papers available for exchange with U.K. authorities by 15 June 1954. 

(b) To delete paragraph 4 of the proposed conference agenda. 

(c) That member organizations concemed will submit to USCIB, on 

11 June 1954, the names of their conference delegates and technical 

advisers, keeping the number as limited as possible. 

(d) That Mr. W. Park Armstrong, Jr., subject to his\availability, 

will serve as Chairman of the U.S. Delegation. 

(e) Not to approve, prior to the conference, the U.K. reaues~ for 

authority to extend the scope of their collaboration with l _ eyond 

the provisions of Appendix P, UKUSA. 

2. THIS DOCUMDJT CONTAINS COMMUNICATIONS INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION 

AND SHALL BE HANDLED ONLY IN CHANNELS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED FOR COMINT. 

USCIB: 29.18/6 

eclassifi ed and a ursuantto E .0. 1352
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 27, 2009

s0518 

# Order

May 27, 2009

138465

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138465 COA: 288635 Oakland CC: 07-218413-FH MARTIN LEE WILLIS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 19, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
I STANDllRD FORM 52 PROllULGATED BY t!IE 

U. s. C1¥1L SERVICE COMMISSION 

JANUARY liH-FEDERAL PERSON•EL 

MMiUAL CffAPrER RI 

_··· 

REQUEST FOR PERSONNEL ACTION 

REQUESTING OFFICE: fill in items 1 through 12 and A through D except 68 anJ 7 unless otherwise instructed. 

If applicable, obtain resignation and fill in separation data on reverse. 

1. NAll!EDr.-Misa:m:-ona Aivon n111ne, initiel(s), and surname) 2. DATE OF BIRTH 3. REQUEST NO., C. DATE OF JIEaUEST 

Mi•• Edythe B. Ioq 15 Oct l92S 

5. NATURE OF ACTION REQUESTED: 

A. PERSONNEL (Specify whether appointment, promotion, separation, etc.) 

Promotion 

B. POSITION (Specify whether establish, chan.Ae grade or title, etc.) 

FROM-

.A.dministr&tiVe Aaaigtant# NSA-2047 

GS-6 0 13920. 

Speoial. A••iatant 

llSA - NSS 

IL POSITION TITLE AND 

HUMBER 

9. SERVICI:, GRAD!:, AND 

SALARY 

10. ORGANIZATIONAL 

DESIGNATIONS 

11. HEADQUARTERS 

TO8. EFFECTIVE DATE 

A. PROPOSED: 

ASAP 

B. APPROVED: 

Special A11iatant 

ISA • USS 

6 Feb Sl 

7. C.S.OROTHER 

LEGAL AUTHORITY 

IXl FIELD 11 DEPARTMENTAL 12. FIELD OR DEPARTMENTAL fX"l FIELD 11 DEPARTMENTAL 

A. REMARKS (Use reverse ii nccessar.Y) 

IncWQ.bent has blen performing addi tion.i dutie• tor a period ~ee~ 30 daJ8. 

B. REQUESTED BY (Name and title) D. REQUEST APPROVED B'/ 

---"")11"=---•'-"Wi=ll=i::.::Ul=-=F,_,· •<....::Fc.=ri=·e::=dunc:::c=s. _____ ~--1 Signaturo: __ _.WJ~I.,.J,...I ... 4..,M.......,!""' • .__..F..,R..,T...,ElJf .... ~AuH-------I C. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CALL (Name and telephone extension) Special A•81Bt&nt 

Code 131 Ext 6o493 Titte: 

13. VETERAN PREFERENCE 

NONE WWII OTHER 5·PT. 010-POINT 

DISAB. IOTHCR 

15. 16 17. APPROPRIATION 

SEX RACE FROM: 

TO: 

21. STANDARD FORM 50 REMARKS 

22. CLEARANCES 

A. 

B. CEIL. OR POS. CONTROL 

C. CLASSIFICATION 

E. 

F, APPROVED BY 

INITIAL OR SIGNATURE DATE 

14 POSITION CLASSIFICATION ACTION 

NE\V VICC I. A. REAL. 

18. SUBJECT TO C. S. 

RETIREMENT ACT 

(YES-NO) 

,.. 

19. DATE OF APPOINTMENT AFFIDAVITS 

(ACCESSIONS ONLY) 

-·------ . . -

REMARKS: 

20. LEGJIL. RESIDENCE 

D CLAIMED D PROVED 

STATE: 

roved for Release b NSA on 12-17-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 16-6732~
#### The State ex rel. Fuller, Appellant, *v.*Sutula, Judge, Appellee.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Fuller v. Sutula*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 301.]

(No. 99-424

Submitted June 22, 1999

Decided September 1, 1999.)

*302
      *Johnny Ray Fuller, pro se.*

*William D. Mason,*Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and *Randi Marie Ostry,*Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. Judge Sutula had no duty to issue findings of fact and conclusions of law on Fuller’s second petition for postconviction relief. *State ex rel. Carroll v. Corrigan*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 529, 530, 705 N.E.2d 1226, 1227.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

    We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-87157, 333-05939, 333-37921 and 333-94859) and
Form S-8 (No. 333-75339, 33-75934, 333-04280, 333-08047 and 333-43802) of SatCon
Technology Corporation and its subsidiaries of our report dated December 17,
1998, except to the restatement described in Note A, as to which the date is
September 11, 2000, relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule, which appear in this Amendment No. 3 to Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
May 23, 2001
REF ID:A63090 

•• Arthur v. laJ'tol1 ;tr. •u !elepbono 1.AboratOl"U., Inc. ~ 

~ 

Bill ~to¥'¥ 

JWJ., lew hr .. ., 

Dear ... lrortaD.• 

hrW.t 

l .. wq 1la4 that rou plan to •t.t.o4 the 6·7 Apl"11 

~11116 vt '\he lattonal leeuri~ ~ kientU'io Mvl.aoi7 

br4 au4 to 'Do prQent April 8. 

!be Chier or ~ llSA Jiteciati'f tOt' Co:Nu.ltut• -. 'been nQ.uelf\iec!l to ake appropriate ~nt• tor JOUX' -.. ... 1. 

b tvo-""1 llfttS.. ta •chedule4 to open at. taOO &·•· 

tM 'Qr-11 in the ltatt Cod~ &ooa (11....MJ.) at. tbe •..i 

~ 

a.cur1t;y atation, w..hl1'Sto1:i. It s.. plunt4 to 

a llttrlea ot pre.-ntatione tc tm loll.rd, l:ir1"11ivJ. 

ti. .. re \lp to ute CCl the -.jor p>oblb an.# of .__ 

~-

l .. 1QC)k1DC tot'V&td to INSn; )'® &t tlat ...-t1ga .. 

lltct:re)¥ I 

CCJ NJ 

'MC/O .. .... 8/A~~· ... -

ISARC (Mr. Wiodata, ms) 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a