alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________ No. 14

- 10932 Non

- Argument Calendar

________________________ D.C. Docket No. 5:13

- cr - 00058

- MTT

- CHW

- 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff

- Appellee,
versus JASON JAMES, Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________ (January 6, 2015) Before WILLIAM PRYOR , MARTIN and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Jason James appeals his sentence of 51 months of imprisonment following his plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm
. 18 U.S.C.

Case: 14-10932 Date Filed: 01/06/2015 Page: 1 of 32 §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2)
. James argues that his sentence is unreasonable because the district court failed to consider the statutory sentencing factors before it ordered that his federal sentence run consecutive ly to his undischarged state sentence of five years of probation. We affirm. James’s sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable. The district court considered the presentence investigation report, the statutory sentencing factors , and James’s argument that his federal sentence should run concurrent with his state sentence
. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584( a ) , (b); United States v. Scott , 426 F.3d 1324, 1329

– 30 (11th Cir. 2005)
. The district court had the discretion to order that James’s federal sentence “ run concurrently
. . . or consecutively to the prior undischarged term of imprisonment to achieve a reasonable punishment for the instant offense , ” United States Senten cing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(c ) (Nov. 2013), and it reason ably determin ed that “there was no connection between” James ’s possession of a firearm and an earlier offense of aggravated assault t hat would warrant allowing him to serve t h e sentences for those offenses concurrently
. S ee id. cmt. n. 3(A)
. Th e explanation provided by the district court reveals that it considered James’s background and history and the need for his sentence to provide just punishment for his illegal possessi o n of a firearm, to promote respect for the law, and to deter him from committing further similar crimes. See 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). And the district court sentenced James within his advisory guideline

Case: 14-10932 Date Filed: 01/06/2015 Page: 2 of 33 range of 46 to 57 months of imprisonment, which we consider to be reasonable. United States v. Hunt , 526 F.3d 739, 746 (11th Cir. 2008). The district court did not abuse its discretion when it ordered James to serve his 51 month sentence
c onsecutive to his state sentence of probation
. AFFIRMED. Case: 14-10932 Date Filed: 01/06/2015 Page: 3 of 3
' 

t , -

~ . / . ~ .... ... 

.-

-i 

............... 

•. ,. 

Ser1al:OU195 

25 l!arch 1952 

MDtORAmUf POR S!X:RE'l'ARY, U. K. JOINT C0:-1.mRICATIONS-ELECTRORICS 

CO?«I'l"l'EE (WASBINGTOB) 

~: Jl'relJch Modified Converter M-209-B 

:Ref'erence: Secy u. K. JCEC (w) memo v. 204 dated 6 March 1952 

1. Aft.er caref'ul study of the Frenci.l mo41t'1cet1on ot the 

Converter M-209-B, the Director concurs 1n the re:f'erence. 

2. The Director alao co?M:ura in the necessity :tor 1mpos1ng 

'the restrictions eet f'orth in paragraph 5 ot the reference, 8Jl4 

eanaidera f"urtber that variable spacing must be used with the 

ll)'lltem. 

3. 'l'be use of t.h111 machine tor tntra-u. s. or combined 

COJ111Nnicat1ona is not. consider:-:tl desirable • 

./Jd.ub £ 9!:J:r.n-7 

,.,. -.'BED R. MARCY 

Co1onel, Signal Corps 

Chief' ot Staf .r 

-

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

Copies to: 

Captain E. A. T&Ylor. USN 

secretary, C)'l>her Policy Board, London 

(v/cy ref') 

cc: AG (3) 

04 Comeback Cy ( 

04 Mail Haem 

o4 Dai~ 

412 (2) 

MEMO FOR THE lm:ORD: 

'the French modification ot 

the M-209 ia being considered tor 

NATO fo? 3rd level uae. The ref· 

erence sets forth the UK poaitloza 

on t·ta aecur1 ty am method o'f tO.W ~ 

Thie correspondenee essentially ~:.1-

curs !n the Brit.ish position. 

Hr.R.H.Shav/412/f:IJ~2/mt/12Mar52 

Lt .B .R .Pe ~r&on/AG/(/J219/rlp /1&1'.=· .-·52 Mr.P.C.Auet'5:4/41/&J489/vb/24Ma~~~ 

SECRET 

Qeclassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-29-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a • ~ .... ~ • • I ... :It • • - .. - • •
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 37 (Wednesday, February 25, 2015)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 10321]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04091]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 37 / Wednesday, February 25, 2015 / 
Presidential Documents

[[Page 10321]]


                Presidential Determination No. 2015-04 of February 20, 
                2015

                
Determination and Waiver Pursuant to Section 1209 
                of the Carl Levin and Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon 
                National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015 
                Regarding the Provision of Assistance to Appropriately 
                Vetted Elements of the Syrian Opposition

                Memorandum for the Secretary of Defense

                Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States, 
                including section 1209 of the Carl Levin and Howard P. 
                ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act 
                (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 (Public Law 113-291), 
                I hereby:

                -- determine that sections 40 and 40A of the Arms 
                Export Control Act; section 2249a of Title 10, U.S. 
                Code; and Chapter 137 of Title 10, U.S. Code, would 
                impede national security objectives of the United 
                States by prohibiting, restricting, delaying, or 
                otherwise limiting the provision of assistance, 
                including training, equipment, supplies, stipends, 
                construction of training and associated facilities, and 
                sustainment, to appropriately vetted elements of the 
                Syrian opposition and other appropriately vetted Syrian 
                groups and individuals; and

                -- waive said provisions of law, to the extent 
                necessary to allow the Department of Defense, with the 
                coordination of the Department of State, to carry out 
                the purposes of section 1209 of the NDAA FY 2015.

                You are hereby authorized and directed to report this 
                determination and the accompanying Memorandum of 
                Justification to the Congress and publish the 
                determination in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, February 20, 2015

[FR Doc. 2015-04091
Filed 2-24-15; 11:15 am]
Billing code 5000-04
REF ID:A40415 

:POR O:P:PICIAL USS OHLY 14 October 1958 

TO All Members of the Crypto-Mathematics Institute 

FROM Workshop Committee of C M.I 

It seems highly desirable to build up a "Who's Who" (or rather 

"who knows about or is interested m what? 11 ) file on members of the 

c M I , constructed purely from an Agency point of view The so rt 

of information needed would include a member's academic training, 

relevant experience (lncludmg teaching exper1ence) outside the Agency, 

and technical expenence within the Agen,cy. The last should be 

phrased so as to make clear the natuJ,"e of the work. done, or the 

problem studied - not me~ely "seven monthci 1n RUMP-7041 11 , but 

a statement that would be undeJ:1tood by a crypto-mathematician who 

knew nothing about RUMP-7041 as illtih. You are also asked to give 

sub3ects of any papers you may have written, or courses you have 

taught or studied, and to mention aspects of crypto-mathematics 

which you would be mterest~g m studying should thfill opportunity arise 

To leave you as unhampered i,S pojijsible in malung clear statement, 

this form has been classified "TOP S~CRET V1.hen filled out", and 

should be handled accordingly The committee will very much appreciate it if you will give them this information m your own way in the 

space provided 

Example 

Name and Current Assignment, Location and Phone 

John Doe -- 4Wl27, Ext 46J!> 

I am currently ass1gned to the Remington Rand Computer Programming Branch of Methods Divu1on of the Office of Machine Processing 

of PROD 

Technical Education and Experiem .. e Outside of the Agency: 

1937 - 1941 Southmuuster College, Westport, Arkansas, received 

AB with ma3or ln Physics and minor in Mathematics 

1941 - 1942 Western Rese't've Unn·ersity, Clevel.and, Ohio, MA 

received 111 Mathematics 

1942 - 1944 Instructor m the Mathematics of Computers, Michigan 

University, Ann Aroor, Michigan 

1944 - 1946 Regional Representative for Sperry Rand Computer 

Division 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 02-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A40415 

. ~ 

POR OPPICIAL US:!!: OMLY 

Agency Technical Experience 

1946 - 1950 Office of Analytical Equipment Development of R/D, 

planning logical design of ATLAS I Computer 

1950 - 1954 Programming Division of MPRO During tl11s time I 

did programming for all new computers purchased by 

the Agency and prepared instructional materials in 

Mod Z Algebra and the Algebra of Computer Logic 

1954 - 1956 Assigned to GENS as a consultant on machine processing During this time I took three Agency courses in 

the Russian language 

1956 Present I have been head of MPR0-064 with the assignment 

of planning all phases of Agency effort in automatic 

processing of Intercept traffic 

2. 
REF ID:A40415 - - - --- - -- -- - ----- ---· .. ,., ... ~ .. 

TOP SECRET when filled in 

Name and Current Assignment, Location and Phone 

Technical Education and Experience Outside of the Agency 

Agency Technical Experience.
#### Payne, Appellant, vs. Jelleff, Respondent.

*November*3

*November 23, 1886.*

*Hiring of horses: Joint or several liability.*

-Although, the charges for the hire of horses on several occasions were made against two persons jointly, yet if there was in fact no joint liability they may be held severally responsible, each for what was furnished at his request.

APPEAL from the County Court of *Fond du Lac*County.

The case is thus stated by Mr. Justice Cassoday :

“ This action was commenced in justice’s court to recover the balance due the plaintiff for the use of livery rigs, etc., alleged to have been hired by the defendant from the plaintiff, amounting to $11.50. The answer was a general denial, and pleaded payment. On the trial before the j ustice *247and a jury, a verdict was rendered in favor of the plaintiff for $11.50, and judgment was entered thereon for that amount of damages, and $22.31 costs. From that judgment the defendant appealed to the county court, in which the cause was tried upon the return of the justice, and wholly reversed, and judgment for costs of $44.31 rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff. From that judgment the plaintiff appeals.”

For the appellant there was a brief by *Gerpheide &*McKenna, and oral argument by *Mr. McKenna.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Duffy dé McCrory,*and oral argument by *Mr. McOrory.*

Cassoday, J.

There seems to have been sufficient evidence before the justice to sustain the verdict. If the evidence showed the plaintiff’s indebtedness a dollar less than the verdict, still it would not have authorized the reversal. The plaintiff’s bill of particulars showed the plaintiff’s charges to have been made against the defendant and one Bannon. It is urged that this made it a claim against the two jointly. There is no pretense that they were partners or .in any way associated in business. The livery was not for. their joint use, but for political purposes. Each had livery rigs from the plaintiff, and the defendant only seems to have been held responsible for what was furnished at his request No joint liability was established. The defendant was properly held liable in the justice’s court.

*By the*Court.— The judgment of the county court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with direction to affirm the judgment of the justice.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1292 CA 11-01333 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, LINDLEY, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

THERESA OVERHOFF, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

V ORDER
BAUER SERVICE, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

DUKE, HOLZMAN, PHOTIADIS & GRESENS LLP, BUFFALO (ELIZABETH A. KRAENGEL OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.
BROWN & KELLY, LLP, BUFFALO (RYAN J. MILLS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered December 21, 2010 in a personal injury action. The order denied plaintiff’s motion to set aside the jury verdict and for a new trial.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs ( see Smith v Catholic Med. Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens , 155 AD2d 435; see also CPLR 5501 [a] [1], [2]).

Entered: December 30, 2011 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000674 31-JUL-2014 08:13 AM
99-998.

#### State v. Sanchez.

Ashtabula App. No. 98-A-0006. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On June 10, 1999, appellant filed a notice that a motion to certify a conflict was pending in the court of appeals and, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(A), this court stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal. Whereas appellant has neither notified this court that the court of appeals determined that a conflict does not exist as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(B) nor filed a copy of the court of appeals’ order certifying the existence of a conflict as provided by S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(4)(C),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua *sponte,*that appellant show cause within ten days of the date of this entry why this court should not proceed to consider the jurisdictional memoranda in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. IV(6).
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934



Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): July 27, 2005



First Mutual Bancshares, Inc.



(exact name of registrant as specified it its charter)





|Washington                                     | 000-28261                | 91-2005970                          
|---------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------
|(State or other jurisdiction
of Incorporation) | (Commission File Number) | (IRS Employer Identification Number)





400 -108th AVENUE N.E.

BELLEVUE, WASHINGTON 98004

(425) 455-7300

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code, and telephone number, Including area code)





Not applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)



Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

|[ ] | Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17CFR 230.425)                  
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|[ ] | Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17CFR 240.14a-12)                 
|[ ] | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act
(17CFR 240.14d-2(b)) 
|[ ] | Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act
(17 CFR 204.13e-4(c))



Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Condition

On July 27, 2005, First Mutual Bancshares, Inc, issued a press release announcing its financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2005.  A copy of the press release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits

(c)	Exhibits.

Exhibit		Description

99.1		Press Release, dated July 27, 2005.



SIGNATURE



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

|                     | FIRST MUTUAL BANCSHARES, INC.
|-------------------- | -----------------------------
|Dated  July 27, 2005 |                              
|                     | By:  /s/ John R. Valaas      
|                     | Its:  President and CEO      
|                     |                              



Exhibit Index:



|Exhibit
Number | Description                            
|-------------- | ---------------------------------------
|               |                                        
|               |                                        
|99.1           | 99.1	Press Release, dated July 27, 2005
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
                             PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Allbritton Communications Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Stephen P. Gibson, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.



                                            /s/ Stephen P. Gibson
                                            ---------------------------
                                            Stephen P. Gibson
                                            Senior Vice President and
                                              Chief Financial Officer


December 12, 2003
### -SERVED4U-L Y12 , 201 0

U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
I NTH EMATTE RO F KYL EPONSFOR D FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP09AL000 7 (Civi l Penalt y Case ) DM S FAA-2009-072 9
DEFAUL T JUDGEMEN T Complainant , Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n("Complainant " o r "agency" ) filedaComplain t

date dJul y 24 , 2009
. B y Orde r date dMay 4 , 2010 , Kyl e Ponsfor d ("Respondent" ) wa s deeme dt o hav e answere dth e Complaint
. Pursuan t t o Respondent' s Reques t for Hearing , date dAugus t

2 , 2009 , thi s matte r was se t for hearin g i n Juneau , AK
. o nJun e 29 , 2010
. Ou r Hearin g Notic e wa s serve do n January 13,2010
. O n Jun e 29 , 2010 , Responden t faile dt o appear

at th e hearin g h e requested
. WHEREFORE , i t

b e an di s hereb y ORDERE D a s follows : 1
. Respondent' s Reques t

fo r Hearin g b e an di s hereb y DISMISSE D with prejudice : 2
. Responden t

b e an di s hereb y DEEME D t o hav e admitte dt o all o f th e allegation s i n Complainant' s Complaint ; 3
. Judgmen t

b e an di s hereb y ENTERE D ascjidl-penalt y i nth e amoun t o f $1,000.0 0 agains t

Responden t

a s requeste diirjScffnplaJDant' s Complaint
.

UC f U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09AL000 7 - | (Civi l Penalty Action ) I CORRECTE D SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 '

ON ECOP Y Kyl e Ponsford , Responden t H C 6 0 Bo x 339 4 Haines , A K

9982 7 Glen nH
. Brown , Complainant' s Counse l Senio r Attorney , Offic e o f

th e Regiona l Counsel , AAL- 7 AlaskanRegio n Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 22 2 Wes t 7 * Avenue , Bo x 1 4 Anchorage , A K

99513-758 7 TEL : 907-271-526 9 FAX : 907-271-280 0 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Legal Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n perso no r b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio n Administration, 60

0 Independenc

e Avenue, S
. W. , Wilbu

r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m 2014 , Washington

, D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin

g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.
REF ID:A67427 

COPY FOR MR. FRIEDMAN 

SIGNAL CORPS PA'?Slft BOA.-:u> 

lm'.l'ING 110. 2 ,\pril 11, ic136. 

Z.. 1.. TJae BOard met. at 2130 p. 2., this date, in Room 3435t 

Mazlliion• B•d l 44 ng. Present 1 All .members. 

2. The purpose ot this meeting vu 'to take action and make 

the MCMS'81'J' recommendations with re.ferezu:e to l.l1Tentions ot Willi• 

F· Friedman. said iDTenUona relate to illproTmenta or modi:fiaations 

in mecharlical cipher dfticn, 11COl1Tel'ters u•l.34-Tl ad !i-134-T2" • 

3. 'l'be Board t!Bds that 1 

a. The im'ention of Ir· Friedmall coy.ring a modification in 

ConTarler tiie U-134-Tl ia a. modification et an iATmtion of ueaen. 

Wli&lll r. ?riedriian anl :;eorge .\• Grahamt ?atant }21 028,712 (January 28, 19)6.). 

'b. '?he patent ref'erred to above 1i'8.S granted by the COC!IDiaaianer 

ot ?at.en.ta iiiider allthority contained a section 4886 of the Revised statutes 

end that the war Depart-sent. was giTen a non-exal11siYe license thereto and 

that the )&r Deparlmu.t did not req11est a complete asai~nt. 

c. Tl1e Board recommends1 - (1) That the action ~roposed by :lll'· }'Tiedman in. 

paragraph 2 of hi• memorandma iaf l!areh 241 1'36, to Research 

and 1)eV81.opment :Jirision (through 1er Plans and rr•ining 

Division) be approved, and tha"S ~r. Friedman be i:is-cruct.ed 

to submit specifications to t.he Patent. 3ection for the 

neceas8l"J' ac1;ion wi:th a view to obtaining Letters ?dent. 

(2) Tha:t the inventioa be not considered iaportant in 

the wational Defense, and that a aon•excluaive license to 

the GoTernment, in writ!Zlg, be re«1airad. 

!I l. The Board :!1.Dds that r 

a. The inTmt.1on of Mr. Friedman coYering .moclif1cations in a 

cipher derice tao• as1 •c011Yerler 11•134-t!•• ccwers improvements in a 

deri.ce now being prosecuted 1111der pateat. application .f'82,096s ud tmd.• 

'which seweral claim baTe bee allowed. 

l b. Whereu1 the original iavent.ioa we.a not considered of such 

importance -u to be placeci in the catego17 which prondea tor its beiag 

«ept secret, the 1mproTemenia deacribed iD the cleltcription accOlllpallJing 

his meaorand.Wll ot uarch 23, 1936, t.o auea.rch ancl DeTelopment DiTisicm, ihroagh ~ar Pl.au and Tn1zdng Dirision, are conaid_.ed aa, •Dllportant 1D the nation-al 

Defense•. 

lA\pproved for Release by NSA on 09-10-2013 pursuant to E.O. 1352§ 
REF ID:A67427 

(1) that the application tor patent coT8l"ilag mdi.t.teati.• 

1n CODTerter u-1)4-?2 be proa.ectaad. uder the j>l"DTid.oa of 

secliOD 4886 ot the Rniaed stat.~ea1 

(2) That, ader tba prnis1ou of paragraph 6 a, AR-8:SD-S01 

December 31, 1,34, a complete a88igallrelrl 1le requested, aad, 

(3) That the iDTent.icm 'be kept secret. 

aoger B• Colton, 

~ col., Sipsl corps, 

?reaideat. 

~. s. RumlKtugh, 

)laJor, Signal Corps, 

z•• ... 

2 

George I• aa.ct, 

captain, Ji&DaJ, COJ'P•• 

Member. 

"Jalt er c. =llls, ~a.jor, ;;ignal corps., 

aecord.er. 

J. B· Allison, 

K&Jor Gonera4 

Chief Sipal Off1c• of tbe B87•