alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AFS

- 1 3

- 329

- E May 17, 2013

Exemption No. 10327A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0770

M r. Don Bintz

Unmanned Systems, Inc.

2709 Cyrano Avenue

Henderson, NV 89052

Dear Mr. Bintz :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption

No. 10327 . It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations. In addition, please note that the exemption nu mber above has been changed

to reflect your correct designated exemption number, Exemption No. 10327.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 1, 2013 you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on

behalf of Unmanned Systems, Inc. ( US I )

, for an exemption from §§ 91.9(b) (2) and 91.203(a)

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . This exemption will allow USI to

operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that does not carry and display the aircraft’s

airworthiness, certi fication, and registration documents required under part 91.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FA A has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to USI

.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10327

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrato r has

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations

.

Conditions and Limitations

1. The documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the pilot in

command of the UAS anytime the aircraft is ope rating.

2. Those documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be made available

within 10 days to any FAA, U.S. Department of Defense, or law enforcement

official.

3. This exemption is not valid for operations outside the United States.

This exemption termi nates on August 31, 201 6

, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

Service
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                         DANSKIN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                               530 SEVENTH AVENUE
                                 NEW YORK, N.Y.

               LETTER TO COMMISSION PURSUANT TO TEMPORARY NOTE 3T
                                 MARCH 28, 2002

Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20549-0408

Ladies and Gentlemen:

    Pursuant to temporary Note 3T to Article 3 of Regulation S-X, Danskin, Inc.
and Subsidiaries has obtained a letter of representation from Arthur Andersen
LLP ("Andersen") stating that the December 29, 2001 audit was subject to their
quality control system for the U.S. accounting and auditing practice to provide
reasonable assurance that the engagement was conducted in compliance with
professional standards, that there was appropriate continuity of Andersen
personnel working on the audit and availability of national office consultation.
Availability of personnel at foreign affiliates of Andersen is not relevant to
this audit.

                                          Very truly yours,
                                          Danskin, Inc. and Subsidiaries
                                          /s/ John A. Sarto
                                          John A. Sarto
                                          Executive Vice President and Chief
                                          Financial Officer
Presidential Documents

12067 

Federal Register 

Vol. 80, No. 43 

Thursday, March 5, 2015 

Title 3— 

The President 

Notice of March 3, 2015 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to 

Ukraine 

On March 6, 2014, by Executive Order 13660, I declared a national emergency 

pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 

1701–1706) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national 

security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions 

and policies of persons that undermine democratic processes and institutions 

in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial 

integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets. 

On March 16, 2014, I issued Executive Order 13661, which expanded the 

scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660, and 

found that the actions and policies of the Government of the Russian Federation with respect to Ukraine undermine democratic processes and institutions 

in Ukraine; threaten its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial 

integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets. 

On March 20, 2014, I issued Executive Order 13662, which further expanded 

the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13660, 

as expanded in scope in Executive Order 13661, and found that the actions 

and policies of the Government of the Russian Federation, including its 

purported annexation of Crimea and its use of force in Ukraine, continue 

to undermine democratic processes and institutions in Ukraine; threaten 

its peace, security, stability, sovereignty, and territorial integrity; and contribute to the misappropriation of its assets. 

On December 19, 2014, I issued Executive Order 13685, to take additional 

steps to address the Russian occupation of the Crimea region of Ukraine. 

The actions and policies addressed in these Executive Orders continue to 

pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign 

policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared 

on March 6, 2014, and the measures adopted on that date, on March 16, 

2014, on March 20, 2014, and December 19, 2014, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond March 6, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), 

I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive 

Order 13660. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with O0

12068 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 43 / Thursday, March 5, 2015 / Presidential Documents 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

March 3, 2015. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05337 

Filed 3–4–15; 11:15 am] 

Billing code 3295–F5 


mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with O0OB#1.EPS</GPH>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 186 

To improve transparency and efficiency with respect to audits and 

communications between taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 16, 2015 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. BLUNT, Mr. BOOZMAN, and Mr. INHOFE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To improve transparency and efficiency with respect to audits 

and communications between taxpayers and the Internal 

Revenue Service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Taxpayer Account5 ability Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEADLINE FOR RESPONSES TO TAXPAYER COR7 RESPONDENCE. 

8 Not later than 30 days after receiving any written 

9 correspondence from a taxpayer, the Internal Revenue 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 186 IS

1 Service shall provide a substantive written response. For 

2 purposes of the preceding sentence, an acknowledgment 

3 letter shall not be treated as a substantive response. 

4 SEC. 3. TAXPAYER NOTIFICATION OF DISCLOSURES BY IRS 

5 OF TAXPAYER INFORMATION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after dis7 closing any taxpayer information to any agency or instru8 mentality of Federal, State, or local government, the In9 ternal Revenue Service shall provide a written notification 

10 to the taxpayer describing— 

11 (1) the information disclosed, 

12 (2) to whom it was disclosed, and 

13 (3) the date of disclosure. 

14 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) shall not apply if 

15 the Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary’s designee, 

16 determines that such notification would be detrimental to 

17 an ongoing criminal investigation or pose a risk to na18 tional security. 

19 SEC. 4. DEADLINE FOR CONCLUSION OF AUDITS OF INDI20 VIDUAL TAXPAYERS. 

21 Any audit of a tax return of an individual by the In22 ternal Revenue Service shall be concluded not later than 

23 1 year after the date of the initiation of such audit and 

24 the Internal Revenue Service shall not assess any tax with 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 186 IS

1 respect to which such audit relates after the conclusion 

2 of such audit. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
99-905.

#### State v. Smith.

Richland C.P. No. 98CR601D. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Richland County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for extension of time to transmit the record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion for extension of time to transmit the record be, and hereby is, granted, and the time for transmitting the record is extended to September 7, 1999.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM XEROX
CREDIT CORPORATION'S JUNE 30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,739
<ALLOWANCES>                                       113
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,646
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,710
<BONDS>                                          3,997
<COMMON>                                            23
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         529
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,646
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   235
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     6
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    102
<INCOME-TAX>                                        40
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 62
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        62
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0




</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, John Thode, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ISCO International, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; 

 

c. disclosed by this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that was materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

a. all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          39,102
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    734,508
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           1,441
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             1,403
<LOANS>                                        921,969
<ALLOWANCE>                                     19,545
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,729,876
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,467,218
<SHORT-TERM>                                    15,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             30,478
<LONG-TERM>                                     88,974
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,990
<OTHER-SE>                                      71,216
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,729,876
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 58,652
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               36,921
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     3
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                95,576
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              37,018
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,433
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           54,143
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,806
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,792
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      21,073
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,073
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.65
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.38
<LOANS-NON>                                     45,398
<LOANS-PAST>                                     3,400
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 8,809
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                19,381
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,684
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,348
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               19,545
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            19,545
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Matthew Rodriquez 

Secretary for 

Environmental Protection 

March 6, 2014 

Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

Regional Administrator 

Region 9 

Air Resources Board 

Mary D. Nichols, Chairman 

1001 I Sireet • P.O. Box 2815 

Sacramento, California 95812 • www.arb.ca.gov 

U.S. Environmental Agency 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Dear Mr. Blumenfeld: 

Edmund G. Brown Jr. 

Governor 

The Air Resources Board (ARB or Board) is submitting to the United States 

Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) a revision to the infrastructure portion of 

California's State Implementation Plan (Infrastructure SIP}. The enclosed California 

Infrastructure SIP revision addresses requirements for several national ambient air 

quality standards (NAAQS), including 1997 and 2008 ozone standards, 1997, 2006, and 

2012 PM2.5 standards, 20081ead standard, 2010 nitrogen dioxide standard, and 2010 

sulfur dioxide standard. 

As required under the federal Clean Air Act (CAA), the Infrastructure SIP addresses 

the elements set forth in CAA Section 11 O(a)(2) by documenting California's authorities, 

resources, and programs to implement, attain, and enforce NAAQSs. The Board 

approved the Infrastructure SIP (Enclosure 1) at a public meeting on January 23, 2014. 

This Infrastructure SIP submittal includes one hard copy and one identical electronic 

copy of the following materials (enclosed). 

1. California Infrastructure SIP (Enclosure 1 ). 

2. ARB Resolution 14-1 approving the California Infrastructure SIP 

(Enclosure 2). 

3. Public Meeting Notice evidence of the January 23, 2014, Board Meeting to 

consider approval of the California Infrastructure SIP (Enclosure 3). 

The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. 

For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs, see our website: http://www.arb.ca.qov. 

California Environmental Protection Agency 

Printed on Recycled Paper 
Mr. Jared Blumenfeld 

March 6, 2014 

Page 2 

4. Comments received in response to the Public Meeting Notice (Enclosure 4). 

5. Statement regarding public availability (Enclosure 5). 

If you have any questions, please call Ms. Lynn Terry, Deputy Executive Officer, at 

(916) 322-2739 or have your staff contact Mr. Ravi Ramalingam, Chief, Consumer 

Products and Air Quality Assessment Branch, at (916) 322-2085. 

Sincerely, 

Enclosures (5) 

cc: (with enclosures) 

Deborah Jordan, Director 

Region 9, Air Division 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

Lynn Terry 

Deputy Executive Officer 

Executive Office 

Ravi Ramalingam, Chief 

Consumer Products and Air Quality Assessment Branch 

Air Quality Planning and Science Division
REF ID:A62445 

-SECRET 

17 JUIJlil 1955 

~.10R ~ DAV18 

ltlBJSC'rs Comittftct am. Joa.rd lilnl:iermipl ot Mr· w. r. ,r-iedJl:an 

'tbe t"ollo'.li:aC 11 a la'i ot camitt.e1, board.a, .tc. at which 

Kr· lriedan la & ~rt 

O.neral Ordu-• Jlu.Diber 64s 

91' :S:UautiTIJ :oevalopatnt Joa:rd .. -"«tr ot tha :lo«Lrd 

Oeneral Ord.er• 111.mber 14 I 

EA Civilian lromot1on Ritviav lloard - -*er ot the brd 

(Mi·. Olinr X!rb)' .. atticial al'tel'Date) 

l8A. •auiat1on Jlu.mber u .. 5, 

JalA Pllrtotmel DeYe~t br4 .. vot1nB ...,.r 

General Oiura ~r S5• 

I&\ Clu•ificat1on Ad'fiaory ~l ... Cb61:ran 

M. loo ComitW. tar ~OVltJOOnt ot Allied (.Mm) Ociaini•tions 

S.CU?'ity {Approach w the rnttieb) ... ottieial. ..tber 

Ccabined \Jorldua Group rw All1"4 (11A'tt>) Coaw>riioa.tiona S.Our1tq 

(Approaoh to tblt J'rttnch) .. ot.tici&l -=*>er 

General Or4e:n l'unt1er l)t 

Et\ C1v1.Uan PllTIOmlel lc:reenbg Joe.rd. - voti.Dg ~r 

Gerleral Order• ~r 881 

l8A hchnical Journa.l ld.itorial Pol.it:f brd ... Cbt.inan 

ISA ~tim l\u:lt>er U0-1 (Chit.rip t)t 

l'l'OfP"Ul ~ ~t AdvUora ... pe~ ..t:>er 

DA legu.l&tion Jbllbel" u .. 3 t 

mA ScieDt.itic .A4vaor:t loa:r4 - a.cut1ve a.cnte.r,r 

Oeneral Ord.er• luttMJ-r 16 a 

&\ i:ucutiv• Croup tor loud Attain (awl) - Cbai~ 

nr. l'.Ull:back .. Vice Cbainan 

-SECRE9F 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352\3 - -~-~ 

-
REF ID:A62445 

~--~ ~ ~ ~ --- - ~ . ~ - ~ . -. ~ 

tos »r. l\.\JU.ek, l/n 

Vic. Chai.nan, lxeeutift Grcup 

ror b.rd Attain 

--- ~· 

"i- ... 

~.: 

~ 

.. ~~ ~.., 

, ...... ·~ 

:.-. ..,-

.:t.:_ 

-. -

.".;l...!._ 

i~--

~ w - - • - • ~ - ~ * ~ • ~ - - - - • -- ( 

Jt«»ls ir.. trie418n, •IA 16 June 5~ COl£RT 11-· . 60493/ctU:J. ~-

In v1ev ot the extended ab1ence ot Mr. 'l'r1edaan, Cl-.irmo.n, lxecu.tivo Group · tor~ lttta.ira~ thia •tter 1a roterred to )'0\11 .. Vico Cba.in!Nl, tor -.n;y- recomMnda.tions ar ccarmenu JOU al)" ldllh to ..m. 

Ill' 

~ 

QTI!lt 

Adm1n. AB#iwtant to 8/A