alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000351532
<NAME> INTERFERON SCIENCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          86,650
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  386,416
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    439,139
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,048,991
<PP&E>                                      12,771,773
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,309,451
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,764,092
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,705,057
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        46,681
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,354
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,764,092
<SALES>                                        459,798
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               459,798
<CGS>                                        1,033,219
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,033,219
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,049,187
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,617,871)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,617,871)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,617,871)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.57)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.57)
        


</TABLE>
, 

lypist: 

FILE: 

... 

.. " : 

:.=·; .. ~ .t .. ~ ,,. . - ' .. . 

,.~ ..... ... ~l- .. ' ... 

" • J!' ·, ... 

& &a'IWIMIT--- I ~~~...-.
Exhibit 10.44

INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATION

2000 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN



---

2007 AMENDMENT



---

Interactive Data Corporation (the
Company) hereby amends the Interactive Data Corporation 2000 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the Plan) as set forth below.

* * * * *

1. Adjustments. The first sentence of Paragraph (c) of Section 4 shall be amended by deleting the clause: that
the Committee shall determine as indicated below:

(c) Adjustments. In the event that any recapitalization, forward or
reverse split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, repurchase or exchange of Stock or other securities, Stock dividend or other special, large and non-recurring dividend or distribution (whether in the form of cash,
securities or other property), liquidation, dissolution, or other similar corporate transaction or event, affects the Stock such that an adjustment is appropriate in order to prevent dilution or enlargement of the rights of Participants under the
Plan, then the Committee shall, in such manner as it may deem equitable, adjust any or all of (i) the number and kind of shares of Stock reserved and available for Awards under Sections 4(a) and 4(b), including shares reserved for ISOs,
(ii) the number and kind of shares of outstanding Restricted Stock or other outstanding Awards in connection with which shares have been issued, (iii) the number and kind of shares that may be issued in respect of other outstanding Awards
and (iv) the exercise price, grant price or purchase price relating to any Award. (or, if deemed appropriate, the Committee may make provision for a cash payment with respect to any outstanding Award).

* * * * *

2. Further Amendments. Except as
hereinabove specifically amended, all provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect; provided, however, that the Company hereby reserves the power from time to time to further amend the Plan.

* * * * *



---

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this
2007 Amendment to be executed in its name and on its behalf this 15thday of February, 2007.



INTERACTIVE DATA CORPORATIONBy:

/s/ Stuart J. ClarkStuart J. Clark, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATIONS

I, J. Michael Anderson, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of Layne Christensen Company; |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date:  April 20, 2018

 

| /s/ J. Michael Anderson                           |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| J. Michael Anderson                               |
| Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|FOR MORE INFORMATION                 | FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
|------------------------------------ | ---------------------
|Contact Andra K. Black, Co-President | Date  June 14, 2001  
|and Chief Financial Officer          |                      
|at (515) 223-8484                    |                      

Clive, Iowa . . . StateFed Financial Corporation (NASDAQ: SFFC) announced today
preliminary results of the modified dutch auction tender offer that expired on Monday, June
11, 2001.  Approximately 493,808 shares were tendered at prices between $11.50 to $13.00
per share.  StateFed Financial Corporation expects to purchase approximately 231,774 of
these shares which represents approximately 47% of the shares tendered or 15% of the
company's issued and outstanding shares.  The number of shares is subject to verification
by First Bankers Trust Co., which acted as the depositary in the offer.  The actual number
of shares to be purchased and the price per share will be announced within several days upon
completion of the verification process.  It is currently expected that payment for all shares
purchased will be made on or about Monday, June 18, 2001.

StateFed Financial Corporation is a savings and loan holding company based in
Clive, Iowa, and has approximately $109 million in total assets.  Its subsidiary bank, State
Federal Savings and Loan Association of Des Moines, has three banking offices serving the
Des Moines and Clive area.
<PAGE>   1

EXHIBIT 11.1
STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                        Three Months Ended                   Nine Months Ended
                                                   -----------------------------        -----------------------------
                                                   September 30     September 30        September 30     September 30
                                                       1995             1994                1995             1994
                                                   ------------     ------------        ------------     ------------
<S>                                                <C>              <C>                 <C>              <C>
EARNINGS PER SHARE

   Weighted average shares outstanding              20,497,109       20,302,920          20,464,887       20,052,651
                                                   ===========      ===========         ===========      ===========
   Net income per share                            $      0.48      $      0.47         $      1.26      $      1.37
                                                   ===========      ===========         ===========      ===========

PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE

   Weighted average shares outstanding              20,497,109       20,302,920          20,464,887       20,052,651
   Dilutive stock options                              230,285          174,384             205,642          203,062
                                                   -----------      -----------         -----------      -----------
                                                    20,727,394       20,477,304          20,670,529       20,255,713
                                                   ===========      ===========         ===========      ===========

   Net income per share                            $      0.47      $      0.46         $      1.25      $      1.36
                                                   ===========      ===========         ===========      ===========

FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE

   Weighted average shares outstanding              20,497,109       20,302,920          20,464,887       20,052,651
   Dilutive stock options                              285,590          186,797             299,837          209,251
                                                   -----------      -----------         -----------      -----------
                                                    20,782,699       20,489,717          20,764,724       20,261,902
                                                   ===========      ===========         ===========      ===========

   Net income per share                            $      0.47      $      0.46         $      1.25      $      1.35
                                                   ===========      ===========         ===========      ===========
</TABLE>
Capitol B uilding Roo m 24 1 -South 300 SW 1 Oth Street Topeka, KS 66612

Mr. Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region VII 90 1 North 5 111 Street Kansas City, KS 66 101 Dear Mr. Brooks: Offi ce of the G overn or June 13, 2011 phone : 785 -296 -3232 fax: 785-368 -8788 governor@ks
. gov Sam Brownback, Governor

In June 20 I 0, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) revised the primary N ational Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for sulfur dioxide (S02) (75 FR 35520). The process for de signations following promulgation of new or revised NAAQS is contained in Section 107(d)(l) of the Clean Air Act (Act). This section of the Act provides a process for the Governor to recommend attainment, nonattainment, or unclassifiable designations, with appropriate boundaries , to EPA and requires that these recommendations be submitted to EPA within one year of promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS. This letter is intended to fulfill this obligation for the State of Kansas. In the preamble to the NAAQS rulemaking and in a March 24, 2011 , EPA guidance memorandum from Stephen D. Page, 

### Area Designations/or the 2010 Revised Primary Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards, EPA describes the expected designations process. EPA ' s final designations are expected to be based on 2008-2010 air quality data reported from existing S02 monitors and on any refined modeling conducted by the states specifically for initial area designations. EPA's planned designation approach is as follows:
• Any area that has either monitoring data or refined modeling results showing a violation would be designated " nonattainment." • Any area that has both mo- nitoring and refined modeling results showing no violations wou ld be designated
" attainment." • All other areas initially would be designated " unclassifiable. " • County would be the presumptive nonattainment boundary unles s the state demonstrates otherwise m recommendations to EPA. EPA states in its guidance memorandum , " Given the currently limited network of S02 monitors and our expectation that states w ill not yet have completed appropriate modeling of all significant S0 2 sources , we anticipate that most areas ofthe country will be designated 'unclassifiable."'2010 !-Hour Sulfur Dioxide NAAQS De signation Page 2 of2

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has evaluated sources of S02 but has not completed modeling at this time. Because there are no existing S02 monitors that violate the revised standard, I recommend that EPA designate each ofthe I05 counties in Kansas as "unclass i fiab le" with respect to the revised S02 standard. Please feel free to contact Jo hn Mitchell, Director of the Division of Environment, at 785-296-153 5 or jmitchell@kdheks.gov ifyou have any questions regarding this designation recommenda tion. Sincerely,

Governor of the State of Kansas

c: Robert Moser, MD, Secretary, KDHE John M itchell, Director, Division of Environment Rick Brunetti, Director, Bureau of Air
MOTION DOCKET

96-2029.

#### State v. White.

Ashland C.P. No. 96CRI07366. On motion to recall mandate and permit supplemental briefing. Motion stricken.
EERE Information Center

Search Help More Search Options

Printable Version

Residential Clothes Dryer and

Room Air Conditioners

Framework Document Public

Meeting

Purpose: The U.S. Department of Energy

(DOE) held a meeting to discuss the

procedural and analytical approaches DOE

anticipated using to evaluate energy

conservation standards for residential clothes

dryers and room air conditioners.

Some of the following documents are

available as Adobe Acrobat PDFs. Download

Adobe Reader.

Public Meeting Materials

Notice of public meeting and availability

of the Framework Document (PDF 76

KB) PLEASE NOTE: The correct date

for submitting comments to this

document is November 7, 2007, not

October 3, 2007, as listed in the

notice.

Framework Document (PDF 740 KB)

Agenda (PDF 26 KB)

Presentation (PDF 731 KB)

Transcript (PDF 302 KB)

Contact Information

Stephen Witkowski, P.E.

Project Manager

(202) 586-7436

Printable Version

DATE: October 24, 2007

TIME: 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. EDT

LOCATION:

Holiday Inn Capital

550 C Street SW

Washington, DC

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Clothes D... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/c...

1 of 2 7/16/2009 2:43 PM

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010 COMMENT 12
Building Technologies Program Home | EERE Home | U.S. Department of Energy

Webmaster | Web Site Policies | Security & Privacy | USA.gov

Content Last Updated: 07/01/2009

Appliances and Commercial Equipment Standards: Residential Clothes D... http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/residential/c...

2 of 2 7/16/2009 2:43 PM

EERE-2007-BT-STD-0010 COMMENT 12
Exhibit24.9

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BYTHESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appointseach of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or either of them,each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, withfull power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, inany and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the"Corporation") Annual Report on Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Form10-K") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation oron behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of theCorporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument,contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibitsthereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including thispower of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and anyapplicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body,granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone,full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thingrequisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fullyto all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do orcause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has signed these presents this 8th day of March,2005.

|  | /s/ KENNETH L. WOLFE |
|--|----------------------|

|  |
|--|
|  |  |  |
|  |

|  | KENNETH L.WOLFE |
|--|-----------------|

----
Exhibit 8.1





List of Subsidiaries







Below is a list of subsidiaries directly and indirectly owned
by CalciTech Ltd.



|Name of Company                                   |  | Country     |  |  | Proportionheld          | Nature of business                              
|------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  |  | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------------------
|CalciTech Synthetic Minerals Ltd. (“CSM”)         |  | Bermuda     |  |  | 100% owned by CalciTech | Technology licensor                             
|CalciTech Group Services SA                       |  | Switzerland |  |  | 100% owned by CSM       | HQ Administration                               
|CalciTech Synthetic Minerals Europe Ltd. (“CSME”) |  | UK          |  |  | 83.44% owned by CSM     | European holding company and operations licensee
|CalciTech Piesteritz GmbH                         |  | Germany     |  |  | 100% owned by CSME      | Production Company
Amendment to the 2011 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.7.2 
 WHITEGLOVE HEALTH, INC. 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO 2011 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

 The 2011 Equity Incentive Plan of WhiteGlove Health, Inc. (the “2011 Plan”) is hereby amended,
effective as of July 18, 2011, as follows: 
 1. The first sentence of Section 1.3(a) of Article I of the
2011 Plan is hereby amended to be read in its entirety as follows: 
 The maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may
be issued under the Plan shall be 850,000 shares, plus (1) any shares of Common Stock that, as of the Registration Date, have been reserved but not issued pursuant to any awards granted under the Company’s 2007 Stock Option/Stock Issuance
Plan, as amended (the “Existing Plan”) and are not subject to any awards granted thereunder, and (2) any shares of Common Stock subject to stock options or similar awards granted under the Existing Plan that
expire or otherwise terminate without having been exercised in full and shares of Common Stock pursuant to awards granted under the Existing Plan that are forfeited to or repurchased by the Company, with the maximum number of shares of Common Stock
to be added to the Plan pursuant to clauses (1) and (2) equal to 2,367,250 shares of Common Stock. 
 2. Except as
modified by this Amendment, all the terms and provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, WhiteGlove Health, Inc. has caused this Amendment to be executed on its behalf by its duly authorized officer as of July 18, 2011. 
  


	
	WHITEGLOVE HEALTH, INC.
	
	/s/    William J. Kerley    
	 William J. Kerley
 Chief
Financial Officer
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
Doc ID: 4103376
#### Bergh, as Commissioner of Banking, Respondent, vs. Security Savings Bank, Respondent, and others, Appellants.

*September 9*

September 27, *1904.*

*Banlcs:*Insolvency;; *Winding-up action, by whom to be brought: Substitution of parties.*

Ch. 234, Laws of 1903, does not authorize the commissioner of hanking to bring an action to sequestrate the property and wind up the affairs of a state bank; and such an action having been brought by him, the application of creditors of the bank to be substituted as plaintiffs should have been granted.

Appeal from an order of tke circuit court for Ashland county: John K'. Parish, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

Por the appellants there was a brief by *Sanborn, Lamo-reux &*Pray, and oral argument by A. *T. Pray.*

Por the respondents there was a brief by the *Attorney General*for the plaintiff, and *Richard Sleight*and *Edward Foster*for the receiver, and the cause was argued orally by *Mr. Sleight.*

Winslow, J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to grant the motion of the appellants, *Lolvman*and others, to be substituted as plaintiffs in the action for the plaintiff *Bergh.*The action is one in equity to sequestrate the property of a state bank and wind up its affairs. It appears by the complaint that the directors of the bank placed the same in the hands of the commissioner of banking February 13, 1904, and that the commissioner on the following day commenced this action against the bank alone, and a receiver was appointed. Three days thereafter, the appellants, *Lohman*and others, upon verified petition showing that , they were creditors of the bank in large amounts, and that the same was insolvent, and that the officers and stockholders had been guilty •of mismanagement in various ways, moved that they be sub*515■stituted as plaintiffs for the commissioner of banking, and they appeal from an order denying the motion.

It is clear to onr minds that the motion' should have been granted. It was denied, apparently, on the ground that by •ch. 234, Laws of 1903, the commissioner of banking was endowed with power to bring such actions in his own name. 'There is no foundation for this claim. There is no word or -sentence in the entire chapter conferring any such right, in terms, nor can such an intention be inferred therefrom. On the other hand, the statutes regulating the procedure in actions of this nature (viz., secs. 3218, 3219, *et*seq., Stats. 1898) remain untouched by said ch. 234. Sec. 3219 provides, in express terms, that the action may be brought by the .-attorney general in the name of the state, or by any creditor •or stockholder of such corporation. Why it should be supposed that the commissioner of banking *is added*to the list ■of plaintiffs by ch. 234 we are at a loss to understand. Having actually brought the action, the application of the creditors to be substituted for him should at once have been .•granted.

*By the Gowrt'.*— Order reversed, and action remanded with •direction to grant the motion for substitution.
<PAGE>

                                                   Exhibit 24


                               POWER OF ATTORNEY
                               -----------------


     We, the undersigned officers and trustees of NSTAR (the "Trust"), hereby
severally constitute Thomas J. May, Russell D. Wright, Douglas S. Horan, and
Michael P. Sullivan, and each of them singly, our true and lawful attorneys,
with full power to them and each of them to sign for us, and in our names in the
capacities indicated below, any and all amendments (including post-effective
amendments) to the Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Employee Savings
Plan of Commonwealth Energy System and Subsidiary Companies, and generally to do
all such things in our names and on our behalf in the capacities indicated below
to enable NSTAR to comply with the provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and all requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby
ratifying and confirming our signatures as they may be signed by our said
attorneys to all amendments to said registration statement.

     Witness our hands and common seal on the respective dates set forth below.

/s/ Thomas J. May         Chairman of the Board,                August 18, 1999
-------------------       Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer,
THOMAS J. MAY             and Trustee



/s/ Russell D. Wright     President, Chief Operating Officer,   August 18, 1999
---------------------     Clerk, and Trustee
RUSSELL D. WRIGHT