alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
- ------

REF ID:A63059 

•o DISTRIBUTIOK 

DIR/lfSA, WASH, D.C. 

ROUTINE 

CR BSllUR, FRAJKFURT, GEmlAIY 

xx 

WG ___ • 

MCGRi:GOR FROM FRIIJJW(. PACKAGE ID'l' ll VIP I.OUJIGE WAS PAPIR SHOPPIXG BAG 

CO:MTAIIIIG BEW TRAVEL CLOCK Ilf I.U.TBER CASK, DW LilATDR CASID SHAVIBG KIT 

WITH EMPTY COBTAIMERS, COMB AID BRUSH, ETC., DW LADIES VAIIITY CASE AID 

1'EW 'BELT BUCKJ.B. PIS ASK PETKRS01'S DRIVER I.OOK Ilf TRURK COMP.ABTMlnT FOR 

PAPER SHOPPING :BAG. DID lfOT BA.VB BOX AT ALL .AMOBG MY SIOllJIItGS AID BE 

MISTAKEN OB THAT romr. AIBO PIS EXAMIIB BAG FOUID m VIP LOUBGE AGAIB 

AID CHICK WITH COBTUTS LIST.ID ABOVE. 

COIF 1 1 

William ., • Friedllla.n, Ga-18 

6o493 Spec:l..al. Assistant to Director, nBA 

i 

• 

~ . 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a-------
REF ~?}';~~" 1 v .... "':. ... -# ..... ,. 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT: CLASSIFICATION NUMBER: Di ff icul ty 1Ct?BU.'ince SIG ROD to New Dcllhi Radiograr.is ASA Pacific 

Karachi, Singa~ore. 

AS-CM-IN ~460 Out 3816 

To:ASA-80, Attaches 

From: ASAPacific 

Date of Communication: 10 J.Iar. 1948 

Date of Basic Document: ~ Mar. 1948 

BRIEF SUMMARY: 

Present plans for issue of SIGROD to New Delhi, Karachi and S1ngapur6 tempor~rily suspended dud to difficulties encountdrdd in obt .ining visas 

granting customs exem~tions and aut.orizing the we1rin6 of weapons. 

Request local authoriti~s be cont~ctdd for authorization for entry of 

armed personnel carrying sealed cont~iners into countries concerned. 

Material will be delivered as soon as transportation can be arrangdd after ap~ropriate visas have been issued, 

Suggest utilization of Atate Dept. courier servic~ rf>im Shanghai to 

Singapore-New Delhi and Karachi. If necessary Air At~he Karachi could 

pick up machines from M~w Delhi. As alternative suggest you request 

American Political Adviser to design~te officer and men as diplomatic 

couriers rather than attempt per~isaion for entry as Military Personnel. 

Classifier:t~iss Meece Routed to: File 

Typist: ~.Uss Meece Date of Classifying: 10 Uar. 194 8 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

Atfi-~mm~§ 

Machine SIGROD Gem. 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-15-2014 

ursuant to E.O. 13526 

WDGAS Form No. 1493 7 October 1946 44052 

- ·-- -----
Exhibit 10.2

AMENDMENT

TO

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

This Amendment is made and entered into as of the 31st day of March, 2004, by and between Satcon Technology Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the "Company"),
and David B. Eisenhaure (the "Executive").

The
following facts set forth the background to this Amendment:



NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1.Amendments.The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:



2.Effective Date.This Amendment shall be effective as of the date set forth above. From and after the
effective date hereof, each reference in the Agreement to "this Agreement," "hereto", "hereunder" or words of like import, and all references to the Agreement in any and all agreements, instruments,
documents, notes, certificates and other writings of every kind and nature shall be deemed to mean the Agreement as modified and amended by this Amendment.

3.Counterparts.This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and by different parties hereto in separate
counterparts each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be deemed to be an original and all of which when taken together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.

4.No Other Modifications.Except as otherwise expressly modified by the terms and provisions of this Amendment,
the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect, and is hereby in all respects confirmed and ratified by the parties hereto; and, except as expressly provided herein, nothing in this Amendment
will be construed as a waiver of any of the rights or obligations of the parties under the Agreement.

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and the Executive have executed this Amendment as of the date set forth above.

| |  | COMPANY:                                             
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------
| |  | SATCON TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION,
a Delaware corporation
| |  | By:                                                  
| |  | EXECUTIVE:                                           
| |  | /s/ David B. EisenhaureDavid B. Eisenhaure           

2

---



QuickLinks
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bryon L. Fye, Appellant.

[773 NYS2d 717]

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Counsel’s motion to be relieved of assignment granted *(see People v Crawford,*71 AD2d 38 [1979]). (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Larry M. Himelein, J.—Burglary, 3rd Degree.) Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Green, Wisner, Hurlbutt and Gorski, JJ.
<PAGE>   1


     Exhibit 11 - Statement Re: Computation of Per Share Earnings

                            Pioneer Bancshares, Inc.
                   Computation of Net Income Per Common Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
For the years ending December 31,                            1996         1995         1994
                                                          ------------------------------------
<S>                                                       <C>          <C>          <C>       
Income as reported in consolidated statement of income    $8,996,847   $7,081,813   $8,059,160
                                                          ====================================
Per share computation of common and dilutive common
  equivalent shares:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding              3,759,912    3,759,912    3,759,912
Weighted average number of shares issuable upon
  exercise of stock options applying the treasury stock
  method                                                           0            0            0
                                                          ------------------------------------
Weighted average number of shares outstanding used
  to calculate per share data assuming no dilution         3,759,912    3,759,912    3,759,912
                                                          ====================================

Net income per common and common equivalent share         $     2.39   $     1.88   $     2.14
                                                          ====================================
Per share computation assuming full dilution:

Weighted average number of shares outstanding              3,759,912    3,759,912    3,759,912

Weighted average number of shares issuable upon
  exercise of stock options applying the treasury stock
  method                                                           0            0            0

Weighted average number of shares outstanding used
  to calculate per share data assuming no dilution         3,759,912    3,759,912    3,759,912
                                                          ====================================

Net income per common and common equivalent share
  assuming full dilution                                  $     2.39   $     1.88   $     2.14
                                                          ====================================
</TABLE>



                                       91
Unassociated Document



Exhibit 10.1




AMENDMENT


TO


PROMISSORY NOTE












    This Amendment to Promissory Note, dated July 27, 2011 (this “Amendment”), is entered into by and between Committed Capital Acquisition Corporation (f/k/a Plastron Acquisition Corp. II) (the "Maker") and Broadband Capital Management LLC (the "Payee"), and amends that certain Promissory Note issued on May 27, 2011 (No. A-1) (the “Note”).


 


For good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


1.           Section 11 of the Note is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“Trust Waiver.  Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Payee hereby waives any and all right, title, interest or claim of any kind ("Claim") in or to any distribution of the trust account in which the proceeds of the initial public offering (the "IPO") conducted by the Maker and the proceeds of the sale of the securities issued in a private placement to be consummated concurrently with the completion of the initial business combination of the Maker, as described in greater detail in the registration statement and prospectus filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the IPO, will be deposited, and hereby agrees not to seek recourse, reimbursement, payment or satisfaction for any Claim against the trust account for any reason whatsoever.”


 


2.           The Note is amended as set forth in this Amendment.  Except only as modified in this Amendment, the Note shall continue in full force and effect.


 


3.           THIS AMENDMENT, AND THE NOTE AS AMENDED BY THIS AMENDMENT, SHALL BE CONSTRUED AND ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICT OF LAW PROVISIONS THEREOF.


 


[Remainder of page intentionally left blank]




 




  





  











  











 


In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written.


 









	 	 
COMMITTED CAPITAL ACQUISITION CORPORATION

	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Philip Wagenheim	 
	 	 	Name:  Philip Wagenheim	 
	 	 	Title:  Secretary	 
	 	 	 	 















	 	 
 
BROADBAND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC



	 
	 	 	 	 
	
 

	
By: 

	/s/ Michael Rapp	 
	 	 	Name:  Michael Rapp	 
	 	 	Title:  Chairman
SECRET 

~~~/ a>;, __ JV-~ 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-27-2014 

ursuantto E.O. 13526 
.. 

' NAME OR mu . ft FSA - uf 

ORIAlllZATIClll MD LOCATION 

I 

I 

4 

~· 

FROll NAME OR Tl1Lll 

CllllAIHATIClll AllD LCICA1IClll 

' . • . 

ltmALI 

DATI 

CIRCll.A11 

CDCllllllllA'llClll 

PILE 

lllRIRllA11DIL 

llrll: MD 

llEIVllll 

.... 

~-'-

•• ft 

· 1 

I 

·.~ 

. ·.-.. 
REF ID:A71122 e 

SECURI T! r::-:uu.s:&: OF LBCTUR8 OH .; • I. 

AFSA-00.A JO .Jan. 19~ 

Sf. J.. G .... .b/•b/,35 

The dratt. of the lecture on CDllBnicat.iona 1.nt-elllgenoe &iY•n b;r 7ou betore tJie 

tac\Ll.t.J and et.ude:its o! r;lua 50-B1 Air Ccn~u.'lic&tion and ~leat.ronic st.e.tt otticere' 

courH, on 29 Sept.f.l~i~cr 19)0 ie approv6d !or delive17, under Use claaeitiaat.im ot 

SECRET, at. the Air COJ:!;.utnd and sWt f:.chool, ~anell A.FB1 on 2 Februu,. 1951.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. § 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§ 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Form 10-Q of Xerox Credit Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), for the
quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Gary R. Kabureck, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John F. Rivera, Vice President,
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of his/her knowledge, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Gary R. KabureckGary R. KabureckChief Executive OfficerMay 8, 2009




/s/ John F. RiveraJohn F. RiveraChief Financial OfficerMay 8, 2009


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 has been provided to Xerox Credit Corporation and will be retained by Xerox Credit Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.



20
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7681

DANNY LAMONT YARBOROUGH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. E. SETZER, JR., Judge,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District

Judge. (CA-95-851-5-CT-BO)

Submitted: January 11, 1996 Decided: January 25, 1996

Before RUSSELL, HALL, and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Danny Lamont Yarborough, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Yarborough v. Setzer, No. CA-95-851-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct.

11, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
• 

' 

!lr. G. Colladay' 

Reta.il ?Jook Do .•rtnont 

Thu Institution for the 

Popularization of Soienae 

1719 l.3troet l!.·,;. 

,:o.ahinr;ton, u.c. 

Doar .~!r. Colladay'1 

REF ID:A7091 ~ 

Febru&l"'J 11, 1~3 

Uy broohuro ~ntitled nTho Uso ot Codoc o..."ld Ciphcrc ii! t'!le 

:7orle ::a.:r uM ltBBDODB to bo Leo.med Thorof'rar.i" \'r.:.D pu:,lioh-3d 

in the Si[;Dal Corps EullotiD Iro. 101, i•auo ot JuJ¥-Soptmil.bor 

1038. Thia bulletin ia a restricted nublication and is now 

out or ;-rint. n:awove:r, tha Air Corps- Liewtena.nt who ia interoated therein. c~ld probably obtain ·a copy cc. 2r.iore.ndurl. 

reoaipt tor a short timD lonn tron tho · .. Q.r Collece Librar,y. 

I Ngret that I am ··unable to offor Alt! inl'onation ooncorniDG Gonoral :!ala.n's 'boO:C. 

Verr; tNly your. 

\:ilU.m::t. F • Friedr.an 

Director, Car.aunico.tion 

~see.rah 

lA\pproved for Release by. NSA on 03-25-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352§ 
William F. Friedman 

3932 Milita17 load 

Washington, D. C. 

.J, I '°' 

t· 
• SGENCE SERVICEfDear Mr. Friedman: 

THI IN51'IMION POI nit l'OfUUlfZAllON Of ~ 

1110N.__ W~D.C. 

. ' 

J'ebl'll0l7 8, 1943 

We have been trying im.succ~ssfu.ll.7 

to reach 7ou b7 'pb.o~. Will you be so kind as to give 

us the name of the -pu.blisher of 7aa.r book: 11 'l!b.e Use o'f 

Codes and Oi-ohers in the World War and lessons to be 

Learned Therefrom"? We have had a request for this boOk· 

from an Air Corps Lieutenant and we are ve17 anxious to 

fill the order for him. Perhaps 7ou. could t•ll us tao, 

where we might be able to locate the book:1 Mil1t8.17 

IntelU.gence in the A.E.J'." b7 Maj. Oen. D. I. Nolan. 

'l!b.anking you for mq assistance you may be able to give 

us, We are, Sincerely, 'lhe Retail &%11: nt. 

1hl1 fonn of communication 11 used In the lnt-t J ;anlQ'& ,.
Second Amendment to the CryoLife, Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.4 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
 THE CRYOLIFE, INC. 

2004 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Section 2.4 of the CryoLife, Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 

2.4 Payment of Option Exercise Price. The payment of the Exercise Price of an Option granted under this Section 2 shall be subject to the
following: 
 (a) Subject to the following provisions of this subsection 2.4, the full Exercise Price for shares of Stock
purchased upon the exercise of any Option shall be paid at the time of such exercise (except that, in the case of an exercise arrangement approved by the Committee and described in paragraph 2.4(c), payment may be made as soon as practicable after
the exercise), unless such Exercise Price is paid pursuant to subsection 2.4(d) below. 
 (b) Unless the Exercise Price is paid
pursuant to subsection 2.4(d) below, the Exercise Price shall be payable in cash or by tendering (by actual delivery of shares) shares of Stock that are acceptable to the Committee, have been held by the participant for at least six months, and were
valued at Fair Market Value as of the day the shares are tendered, or in any combination of cash or shares, as determined by the Committee. 
 (c) To the extent permitted by applicable law, a Participant may elect to pay the Exercise Price upon the exercise of an Option by irrevocably authorizing a third party to sell shares of Stock (or a
sufficient portion of the shares) acquired upon exercise of the Option and remit to the Company a sufficient portion of the sale proceeds to pay the entire Exercise Price and any tax withholding resulting from such exercise. 

(d) If the Award Agreement so provides, the Exercise Price may be paid via a cashless net exercise in which the Participant provides
notice of intent to exercise and pay the Exercise Price pursuant to this subsection 2.4(d) and the Company withholds shares of Stock, valued at Fair Market Value as of the day the Option is exercised, and having an aggregate Fair Market Value equal
to the aggregate Option Exercise Price. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Second Amendment to be executed
effective as of the 24th day of May, 2011. 
  

					
	CRYOLIFE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ D. Ashley Lee

		 	Name:	 	D. Ashley Lee
		 	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer and
 Chief Operating
Officer
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00082

- CR

C HRISTOPHER W AYNE M ORRISS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 89th District Court

of Wichita County ( 61,511

- C )

September 9, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was error in one of the trial c ourt’s judgment s

. We affirm t he trial court ’ s judgment on

coun t 1. We modify the judgment on count 6 to (1) delete and r eplace “Indecency w/

Child Sex ual Contact” with “I nde c ency w / Child Exposure” and (2) delete and

replace “2nd Degree Felony” wit h “3rd Degree Fe lony .” We affirm the judgment on

count 6 as modi fied.SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of LTC Properties, Inc. (or the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (or the Report), I, Wendy L. Simpson, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and I, Pamela Shelley-Kessler,
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, certify solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



Date: February 24, 2010

/s/ WENDY L. SIMPSON Wendy L. Simpson
Chief Executive Officer and PresidentDate: February 24, 2010

/s/ PAMELA SHELLEY-KESSLER Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Corporate Secretary


This certification is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.

---



QuickLinks
3 Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport 

Robert G. Heck, Commission Chair 

Joseph 3. Brauer, Director 

www.fly-i'hi.org 

Januarys, 2012 

" • , j 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

Essential Air Service Division 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE ^"' 

Washington, DC 20590 

Attn: Mr. Dennis J. DeVany, Chief Essential Air Service Division 

RE: Docket OST-2011-0109 Rhinelander, Wisconsin 

Dear Mr. DeVany, 

We wish to thank Great Lakes Airline for their proposal to provide essential air 

transportation to Rhinelander Wisconsin. 

The community has an excellent history with Great Lakes Airlines dating back to 

February 1990. They provided convenient flight schedules to meet the demands 

of the traveling public. Great Lakes Airlines is very familiar with the Rhinelander 

market and peak season travel to our resorts, camps, and second home owners 

during the summer months. The coordination of electronic communications with 

Delta Airlines is a plus since we have many SKYMILES travelers in surrounding 

area. 

We concur with Great Lakes three round trips per day during off peak months 

with an increased flight schedule during our peak summer months to be 

determjned by the airline to meet the historic traffic demands. Again, we look 

forward to working with Great Lakes Airlines in the future. 

Sincerely 

Robert G. Heck - Airport Chair 

Cc: Michael Matthews, Airport Commission 

Rhlnelander/Oneida County Airport 3375 Airport Road Rhinelander, WI 54501 

OfTice: 715-365-3416 Fax -365-3439 Email: rhIarpt@newnorth.net