alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~ ...... 

.. ' 

REF ID:A7~3 

-· . '> .... 

S?SIS 311.G•Gonero.l · 

-------

·~ . 

I . 

llr. A. 3. Clark 

.!Jell I.aboratoriea 

463 .;est Street 

?low York, :;o,; "lcr.k· 

lJeo.r :.:r. Clo.rk: 

.., 

f -

. ,, 

I 

On nu last visit to tho Iaboratorioa, in conversation 

'1.dth Dr. Stabbit1, he mbnt:i.oned a nr. John Rajoh.":Bll who ia 

working with RCA in the eleotr0n:Loa i'ield and hacl developed 

an interustin:::; £adcet. Stebbit& thou~t that wo nit;11t bo 

interested in thia man and I had ~ porsonnol questionnaire 

aont to hir.i in care or Dr. ZWoeyldn, but ~ossibl,y the letter 

went aatro.~ because wu have not roceived a ro?ly• 

·.i·oulu you ploa.:1e ask Stebbitz to Givo mo a nore e~oi!'io 

addre1s? 

S incoro ly yours, 

·, :illiao F. Friod:-J&n 

~irector of CotJnUnicationa 

Research 

pproved for Release by NSA on 03-25-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

13526 
Colonel Corderman 

--1 t •. Colonel tloud -----

--_.--Lt. Colonel U1,;Grn.il -------

~Lt. Colonel N.:J. thews 

,...-1, t. C0l9nel Cock -------''----

-_ --1 t. Golo'nel Biackr1on ---:~a.jar Lt'S,•i::: --,...:.._ -------

-,--1- or nrovm' 

}J ta in .ii.ose11 ------'----~/---- / 

Ca1Jtain Dru:,..,._r---~~--·-.------ -1;,e-- ~J -··-

1st Lt:- Kre>'tlov-~ · __ •• ..'(t_· -------

---1st IJt. Snlt1f ----""";'-··-~~ 

---lt=·t IJt .... Re~~t .,, 

-:--l::;t Lt·. Rlmklc --- __ l 

~1st Lt. -Cac.tore"'vtE: ..:- ·-· ---1st Lt. Harder _____ ..,._~;.,.,-,,~---"--.. '---

--.-11'3t Lt. Hartwell --.-1st Lt'. D. Vi_ Hl ... i_p_s _________ _ 

-l:::;t tt. liam.'i!ar. __ .!~ ·-. • ..-\ 

__:_2nd Lt-'• 'sr:::.ur:io.re. · · ·. - _r- ----~n.d ~t~ .!-Iai1uel _ -~~~ _ .tr. l•riednan. .~ --.-}'..1:rs. 'filain ------------,------

----H!;s ._'-Jo'hhs~n · · ---u:-s. 'l'Lompsc""n....._ ____ __,_.....,_,~-----

---llrs .• _ 'lunrarll , _ 

---~·:l:iss Sass ------------,----'--

~iiss Barker ~~~-i ,/ lf),A,. ;;r~' '• 

Commcn ts c:' He turn 

---Hecom.11emiations. ----------

---Information 

,---Inforrrii1tion-~~-r~.e-t-1-;:r-~---------

-Inf. &. Forwa:rcLi.ng ---Ynur In:. < File·----,---·---

-Signature, if ap;n--ove<l 

---SGe 1Jote 0~1 Back' --------

-As R&qu'<='sted" 

---AS D·Lscussed--------------

-.--Your Action ~' 

----- ----~----~_.~~-

(~) ' 
... 

· .. .,. .. ' . - ••• '=-. •• • 

··.· .. 

. .. ... · .. •· ·- ..... ! . • 

.. · .. · . . -. . . . . . · .. · J,, : . • • • •••••. 

.. : . . . .. . .. "; .. 

,;,. .. -.. . . -· .. . . ,, ...
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.1

Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A. 
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

1. I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A. (the Company).

2. The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and

3. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 22, 2009

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Patricio Jottar    
| |                        
| | Chief Executive Officer

---
AODllE•S OFFICIAL COMMUNICATICINS TD 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE 

WAllHINGToN Z1, D. C. 

«£~~tDh.;CJa~. )'rU-f,t.?J'O~ J 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

WASHINGTON 

November s, 1947 

JniJLORANDUll FOR Clill!F, ABllY SECURITY AGENCY 

A.ttention: CSG.AS-82 

Reterence is made to our Purchase Order No. 1931-48 

ot September S, 1947. It is requested that the following 

One Time Tapes be produced tor the Department of State: .... 

Short Title 

WARllUN 

JW!lWAR 

@tions 

i-100 

l-100 

~~ L. W. Parke, 

Captain, tBN, 

Chief', Division of CryptograptQ'. 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526
<PAGE>


                                                               EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

   We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of
our report dated March 5, 1999, except for Note 2 as to which the date is
August 24, 1999, Note 19 as to which the date is October 18, 1999, and Note 20
as to which the date is December 16, 1999, relating to the financial statements
of Telaxis Communications Corporation (formerly known as Millitech
Corporation), which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to
the references to us under the headings "Experts" and "Selected Financial Data"
in such Registration Statement.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

December 20, 1999
**Exhibit 3.29**

 

**ADDENDUM TO CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT**
 

This is an addendum to the Credit Facility entered into as of February 27th 1998 by and between Epsom Investment Services N.V. (Epsom) and Calcitech Ltd dated the 28th February 2003.

 

Whereas, Epsom has extended credit to the Company on the following new terms:

 

Amount

Two Million Five Hundred Thousand United States Dollars (US$ 2,500,000)

 

Period

To the 6th March 2004

 

Interest Rate

7.5%

 

Facility Fee

1% of the total value of the credit facility paid on renewal of the credit facility

 

Collateral

All  shares held in its wholly owned subsidiary CalciTech Synthetic Minerals Ltd

 

It is agreed that all other terms and conditions of the Credit Facility remain the same.  This addendum is a part of the whole agreement of the above referenced credit agreement.

 

 

 

By:

“D. Craven”

By: “R.A. Leopard”

 

For Epsom Investment Services N.V.

For Calcitech Ltd.

David Craven

R.A. Leopard

 
Director

Director
#### Rosholt and others, Respondents, vs. Corlett and wife, imp., Appellants.

*March 2*2

April *6, 1900.*

*Mechanics' liens: Subcontractors: Notice to owner: Evidence.*

Unless a proper foundation therefor has been laid, oral testimony is incompetent to show compliance with the provision of sec. 8315, Stats. 1898, requiring subcontractors who claim a lien to give written notice thereof to the owner of the property affected.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Wauke-sha county: James J. Dice, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

*John A. Kelly,*for the appellants.

For the respondents there was a brief by *William Flem*ing, attorney,-and *Anthony B. Rogan,*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Rogan.*

WiNSLow, J.

No extended statement of the facts of the case is necessary. The action was a consolidated action for the foreclosure of three alleged mechanics’ liens in favor of subcontractors and materialmen against *Corlett,*the owner of the building, *Lizzie Corlett,*his wife, and the principal contractors for the building, Lesna and Jones; and the judgment established such liens and adjudged *Corlett*and wife personally liable. The complaints charged that the materials were sold and the work performed upon the joint request of the owner and the contractors, and did not allege the giving of the notice required by sec. 3315, Stats. 1898. Upon the trial it appeared without dispute that the materials Avere sold to, and the work was performed for, the principal contractors alone, and that neither *Corlett*nor his wife ordered the materials or made any contract with either of the plaintiffs. The only proof of the notice required by sec. 3315, *supra,*consisted of this question and answer, Avhich Avas put to each claimant: “ *Q.*You gave due notice to *Mr.*
      *475
      *Gorlett?*(Objected to as incompetent. Overruled, and exception taken.) *A.*Yes, sir.”

This proof ivas utterly incompetent, because the notice required must be in writing, and no foundation for oral proof of it had been laid. The objection should have been sustained. The lien is a creature of the statute, and every step prescribed by the statute must be shown to have been substantially followed, or it does not exist. There being no competent proof of the giving of the notice, the lien was never proven. The finding to that effect is, therefore, unsupported by the evidence. It follows that the judgment of lien, as well as the personal judgment for the amount thereof against the appealing defendants, *Gorlett*and his wife, must be reversed.

*By the*Court.— Those parts of the judgment adjudging liens upon the real estate named in the complaint and personal recoveries against the appellants, *Gorlett*and wife, are reversed, and the action remanded with directions to dismiss the action as against said appealing defendants.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

WALLY JEAN

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 3719

[ February 15, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; William W. Haury

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 14014938CF10A

.

Wally Jean, Bowling Green, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., L EVINE and K LINGENSMITH

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-10050

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER EARL RYMAN, also known as Christopher Fred Ryman,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:11-CR-250-38

Before DAVIS, DENNIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Earl Ryman has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Ryman has filed responses. The record is insufficiently developed 

to allow consideration at this time of Ryman’s claim of ineffective assistance of 

counsel; such a claim generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 17, 2013

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 13-10050 Document: 00512473032 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
No. 13-10050

claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed 

to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. 

Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and 

citation omitted). We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions 

of the record reflected therein, as well as Ryman’s responses. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, 

counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS 

DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. Ryman’s motion to relieve counsel and 

appoint substitute counsel is DENIED.

2

 Case: 13-10050 Document: 00512473032 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/17/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          43,473
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   28,934
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,181
<PP&E>                                         314,720
<DEPRECIATION>                                (86,490)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 303,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,514
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           316
<OTHER-SE>                                     232,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   303,918
<SALES>                                        119,710
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               116,396
<CGS>                                           48,751
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   48,751
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,059
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 64,586
<INCOME-TAX>                                    46,404<F1>
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,182
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,182
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.42
<FN>
<F1>Includes a one-time non-cash deferred tax charge of $30.10 million 
recognized as a result of the Combination consumated on March 29, 1996. See 
Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
., I 

. . 

.. • REF ID:A72606 

Ilico: ::I~'G : 33.:;;.GE 

FRC?.i: Al:EJ.-iBASSY J ... mrnou 

IO: li.IJ .. ID ;7ASHINGTCH ~;R: 4853 

Date filed l:AY 23, 1943 

I'ime filed 2100Z 

·.:-ILL r!OT B ; A.BL"~ TO CO:·'il~FNic;..!'!! YCUR T:'"O SIX F::IG-HT ZERO TO 

l ', ': 

.. ., 

( .. ' 

F?.!:::Dt:.~i~ UHTI!, i.:Oi:'UAY OR P0:05I:3LY TU::9DJ-.Y ?D IP ~ST CO?<.TwRSATIC~ .,. 

· .• !Tri ' E HE .Ii"DI.J .... TED 'IrJlT n.~ DID ::l'T ~:-:.\-P:2C'!' A.P.PROVAL OF P!\OPCSAL 

YOU ,. 'S'.~ G-1.;ll\G TO S'S..'!D SH ... "TJL!l S::l SE:?·1T AS 8001~ AS POSSIBLE ~ 

y !!.:?I.::!SSIC~: IS ThAI TH;:s~ ?~~ ... PL~ r ... 4.V!: !):!!;V:"LO?!~.J TRAFFIC 

SUG"!!i.:ST YOU CO!:tf.UNICAT~ "='ITE F'£.IE!:'!.:AN UKT!!, ~~I~Y DIR~TLY TO 

-& ..._ L( &w-••r r } r" rd C ~I>'\ r ._ .I I :. I t: 'I 

AS l:r 1 1 •: 'i ' D~te cc.mpletied r. •• ·• 1-

Ti.c:.e coin.pl eted -----

n::E ~:A:..I::G C:i' ;.1; ~-C 1! CC?Y OF liiIS : :L35.!.GE IS FORBIDDEI~ ' 

eclassified and a roved for release b NSA on 05-28-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 

I. 

.. ,, .. 

. -~ 

.: .. 

d 

' --
# CE2004084EN.01043101.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/431 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/431

---

(2004/C 84 E/0502)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0569/04

by Herbert Bösch (PSE) to the Commission

(26 February 2004)

Subject:   Leonardo da Vinci programme

Subject:

The Commission's Leonardo da Vinci programme is intended to help implement EU vocational training policy. The European Union needs to ensure its citizens are better prepared for entry into the job market and, in doing so, reduce the number of unemployed. The economy is also in need of a skilled workforce in order to keep up with the rapid scientific and technological developments. Against this backdrop, the Leonardo da Vinci programme serves as a laboratory of innovation in the field of lifelong learning.

Can the Commission provide a list of the projects that have been approved under the Leonardo programme over the last three years, including details of the promoters and the level of funding, stating how much has been paid out and how much is outstanding?

Are there any noticeable differences in outlook between the countries and the project managers with regard to various criteria, such as budget, share of funding and the actual results?

How does the Commission ensure that an audit of the funded projects is carried out quickly and efficiently, and how much time elapses on average between a project's completion and the audit?

In which countries do difficulties frequently arise when it comes to the audit?

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(1 April 2004)

(1 April 2004)

The Commission would like to reiterate the important role played by the Leonardo da Vinci programme in the field of vocational training and lifelong learning.

It would remind the Honourable Member that Parliament has lists of Leonardo da Vinci projects selected at Community level over the last three years. Under the committee procedures, once the programme committee has expressed its opinion, these lists are forwarded to Parliament for scrutiny. They include project titles, promoters' names, project durations and the amounts of financial assistance envisaged for each project.

Most of the projects financed last for a maximum of three years, which means the first significant results were not available until the end of 2003. The Commission is analysing the assessments already undertaken with regard to the final reports and results of projects, including the final subsidy allocations and payment periods. It will inform the Honourable Member of the results of this analysis in due course.

---
Exhibit 13.2

 

 

Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.         I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A. (the “Company”).

 

2.         The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and

 

3.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  April 29, 2015

 

 

                                                                                  /s/ Felipe Dubernet       

                                                                                  Chief Financial Officer
<Page>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.62

                               MODIFICATION
                          TO TEAMING AGREEMENT
                           (EXTENSION OF TERM)

This Modification to the Teaming Agreement ("Agreement") originally entered
into between GENERAL ATOMICS ("GA") and SATCON TECHNOLOGY, INC. ("SatCon")
with an effective date of February 20, 2003 extends the term of the
Agreement, as it is therein defined, as follows:

       In order to meet the objectives contained in the Agreement, GA and
SatCon desire that the three-year term of the Agreement be extended to five
years (until February 20, 2008). All other terms and conditions of the
Agreement remain unchanged.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this modification to the
Agreement to be executed in duplicate to be effective as of the later date of
signature below.


GENERAL ATOMICS                          SATCON APPLIED TECHNOLOGY, INC.

BY: /s/ David I. Roberts                 BY: /s/ Donald M. Flodin
   --------------------------------         --------------------------------
TITLE: Senior Vice President             TITLE: V.P. and General Manager
      -----------------------------            -----------------------------
DATE: October 4, 2003                    DATE: September 25, 2003
      -----------------------------            -----------------------------
Full Satisfaction of Mortgage



 Exhibit 10.1(c) 

FULL SATISFACTION OF MORTGAGE 
 Know all men, that the undersigned hereby certifies that a certain Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents and Leases, Fixture Filing, Timber Filing and Financing Statement executed by PFHI
Idaho Investment LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and recorded on December 8, 2008, as Instrument No. 221601 in the records of the Clerk of the District Court of Boise County, Idaho, is fully satisfied and discharged. 

The lien of the undersigned is hereby released. 
 Dated as of: June 28, 2011 
  

			
	 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., in its capacity as
 Collateral Agent

		
	By:	 	     /s/   Anthea Del
Bianco




			
	Name:	 	Anthea Del Bianco
	Title:	 	Vice President









 State of California 
 County of San Francisco 
 On this 28th day of June, in the year 2011, before me, a
Notary Public in and for said state, personally appeared Anthea Del Bianco, known or identified to me to be the person(s) whose name(s) are subscribed to the within Instrument and acknowledged to me that they executed same. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year in this certificate first above written.

  

			
	     /s/   Liliana Claar

	            Liliana Claar, Notary
Public




			
	Notary Public for the State of	 	
California




			
	Residing at:	 	
 




			
	Commission Expires:	 	     February 1, 2012



 /s/   Notary Seal 

  
 2
Exhibit 10.1

 

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO THE

WEST SUBURBAN BANCORP, INC.

 

DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 

WHEREAS, the Company sponsors a non-qualified deferred compensation plan entitled the Directors and Senior Management Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) effective as of January 1, 2005;

 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.2 of the Plan, the Company may amend the Plan by action of its Board of Directors; and

 

WHEREAS, the Board finds it to be in the Company’s best interest to amend the terms of the Plan to provide for a different method of crediting earnings to the Participants’ accounts;

 

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the following Section 1.15a be inserted into the Plan immediately following Section 1.15:

 

“1.15a    “Crediting Rate” shall mean six percent (6%).

 

FURTHER RESOLVED, that Section 3.8 of the Plan be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:

 

“3.8        Crediting of Account Balances.  In accordance with, and subject to, the rules and procedures that are established from time to time by the Committee, in its sole discretion, amounts shall be credited or debited to a Participant’s Account Balance in accordance with the following rules.  The Company shall credit a Participant’s Account Balance with:

 

(a)           the Participants Annual Deferral Amounts, if any; and

 

(b)           interest as follows:

 

(i)            on the last day of each month and immediately prior to the distribution of any benefits, but only until commencement of benefit distributions to the Participant or Beneficiary under this Plan, interest shall be credited on the Participant’s Account Balance at an annual rate equal to  the Crediting Rate, compounded monthly; and

 

(ii)           on the last day of each month during any installment period, interest shall be credited on the unpaid portion of the Participant’s Account Balance at an annual rate equal to the Crediting Rate, compounded monthly.

 











 

A Participant’s Account Balance shall at all times be a bookkeeping entry only and shall not represent any investment made on his or her behalf by the Company or the Trust; the Participant shall at all times remain an unsecured creditor of the Company.”