alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~I 

REF ID:A43809 

• SECRET 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY • 

FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 

Se:r1al: 

/EO 3.3(h)(2) 

N .. 1186 

12 APR 1961 

Director, Central Intelligence Agency PL 86-36/50 USC 3605" 

2430 B street, R. V. . 

Washington 25 1 D. c. 

Dear Sir: 

Reference is DBde to 7011r letter ()f./23 March 1961, in which 7011 

contim flll"eeDM;tDt on the text of an appendix to th~ !Operating 

' 

InstNcti~ for the Cent:ral IDteU:Lsence .Agenq. 

We have piblished this &1Jl*lcl1X and 1Dclose twelve copies tor 

• 

Vice Admiral., USN 

DJ.rector 

Incl: 

Speci~ INnction 

AasignTd to cIA. A~e:ndix 

to the_ / ! for CIA (12 eys) 

!\. 

caw Furiiishec\: cxc==Jtiaison Otticer 

SECRET eclassified and approved for release 

y NSA on 01-26-2015 pursuant to 

.0. 13526 
REF ID:A43809 

SE€RET 

APPENDIX 

s~IAti f JMlcTioRs ASS~GNED TO _cIA 

"6 April 1961 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

Pt 86-36/50 USC 3605 

• IJ»assist the Director,. BSA, in discharg1.ng adequate3" hia national. 

responsibility, CIA will perform specific tasks which ~ caxisidered · es eu ial. and are beyond the capabilities of resources directl)" available to 

RSA. 

2. The functions to be perf'o:'med b;y CIA are those which appear,\. :f'rom pa.st 

experience and discussion, most compatible with existing CIA activities and 

responsibilities. 

3. In accordance with the above, CIA will perfom the tollmd,ng assigned . tunctions: 

Appendix to 

SE€RET 
SBalllf! 

cc: mB~1111111 : C"--.... c• 

AG'-

Bea.ding File 

PROD-o4 (2 cys) 

PROD-03. 

PROD-05 (2 CJ"B) 

PRO.D-001 

D/MB 

OPS 

COSA. 

::f ~~ ::~ 

SE€RE'f e 

Serial: N · 1186 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

M/R: A draft appendix to th~ // - ltor the · Central Intelligence .Agency I was fOJ:'Wal"did to CIA OD m Ja.nuar,y 'b7 EA 

Serial: B0096. In a letter of 1 Pebruar,y 1961, Cr.A p:ropoaed a substitute wording for paragraph 3. b. of the draft. As proposed in NSA 

Serial: No835, dated 7 March 1961, a meeting of BSA an~ Cr.A repreaenta- . tives was held on 17 March 19.61/to cl.ar1fy the issues iovolved. D8A 

¥as represented b;y Mr. Kirby, .Chief, P.ROD-04; Mr. CODl.ey, Chief, COSA; 

Mr. Price, OPS; and Mr. L:lbb····ert, Chief, CO&\-~~ The ~remnent reached 

on the clratt appendix, StlbJect: Special I _ I Assigned to 

CIA, is recorded in a Memo1:8.Udum for the Rico / dite~ March 1961, 

prepared by the CIAl!Liaison Officer. lfo further coordination is 

considered necessary~publication of this appendix. 

G. o. S. DARBY/PROD-0423/33 -s/6 'Apr 6i/rh 

SE€RE'f
**Exhibit 12.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Nicholas Meadmore, Chief Financial Officer for CalciTech Ltd., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Transition Report on Form 20-F of CalciTech Ltd. for the fiscal yearended December 31, 2006 (“Transition Report”);2. Based on my knowledge, this Transition Report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Transition Report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis Transition Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented inthis Transition Report;4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Omitted;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.        Dated:  May 31, 2007 /s/ Nicholas Meadmore   Nicholas Meadmore, Chief Financial Officer   (Principal Accounting Officer)
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 16795-16796]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6919]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70

[EPA-R02-OAR-2012-0032, FRL -9651-4]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Operating 
Permits Program; Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; Administrative Changes

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Puerto Rico 
Regulations for the Control of Atmospheric Pollution, submitted to EPA 
by the Puerto Rico Environmental Quality Board (PREQB) on July 13, 
2011. This action proposes to approve revisions to Rules 102, 111, 115, 
116, 609 and Appendix A. Generally the revisions to the regulations 
involve administrative

[[Page 16796]]

changes which improve the clarity of the rules contained in the 
Commonwealth's Implementation Plan and Operating Permits Program. They 
do not change the emission limitations nor add significant new 
requirements. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal 
Register, EPA is approving the Commonwealth's SIP submittal as a direct 
final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a 
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A 
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final 
rule. If EPA receives no adverse comments, EPA will not take further 
action on this proposed rule. If EPA receives adverse comments, EPA 
will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not take effect. EPA 
will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on 
this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period 
on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action 
should do so at this time.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 23, 2012.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be addressed to: Raymond Werner, Chief, 
Air Programs Branch, Environmental Protection Agency, Region II Office, 
290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866.
    Copies of the State submittal are available at the following 
addresses for inspection during normal business hours:

Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Office, 290 Broadway, 25th 
Floor, New York, New York 10007-1866.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2 Caribbean Field Office Centro 
Europa Building, Suite 417, 1492 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Stop 22, 
Santurce, Puerto Rico 00909.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kirk J. Wieber, Air Programs Branch, 
Environmental Protection Agency, 290 Broadway, 25th Floor, New York, 
New York 10278, (212) 637-4249.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information see the direct 
final rule which is located in the Rules Section of this Federal 
Register.

    Dated: January 30, 2012.
Judith A. Enck,
Regional Administrator Region 2.
[FR Doc. 2012-6919 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 3.3
                                                                     -----------

                          TOMMY HILFIGER CORPORATION

                      (An International Business Company)

                      CERTIFIED TRUE COPY OF A RESOLUTION
                       ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
                  PURSUANT TO THE ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF
                 THE COMPANY ON THE 18/th/ DAY OF JANUARY, 1999


AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
------------------------------------

RESOLVED, that Article 108 of the Corporation's Articles of Association (the
"Articles") be and hereby is amended to add the following sentence at the end
thereof:  "Section 56(3A) of the Act shall not apply to any agreement or
transaction between (a) the Company and (b) one or more of its directors, or any
person in which any director has a financial interest or to whom any director is
related, including as a director of that other person."


Dated this 20/th/ day of January, 1999.


                            /s/ Richard Parsons
                            --------------------------------------------
                            HWR SERVICES LIMITED
                            Registered Agent
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05283**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket** **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  05283\05283_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 05283\05283_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05283\05283_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05283\05283_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05283\05283_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05283\05283_Part E.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05283\05283_Part F.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05283\05283_Part G.xls Plant submitted survey file x 05283\05283_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

05283\Certification Statement Plant ID 05283.pdf Plant certification statement 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_A5-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_A5-3 WaterBalanceDiagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_AEP ELGs ICR submittal letter 10-13-10.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_D3-1 Diagram-2 POND-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_D3-1 Diagram-3 RET POND-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_D3-1.Diagram-1.POND-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_F5-6 Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_Follo Up Questions.doc Follow-up correspondence and material for the survey. x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_Follow up Email.pdf Follow-up correspondence and material for the survey. x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_Follow Up Responses 2.pdf Follow-up correspondence and material for the survey. x 05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_Follow up Responses.pdf Follow-up correspondence and material for the survey.

05283\Supplemental Documents\05283_G3-2 Aerial Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 05283\05283_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

05283\05283_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in theSteam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
## NUMBER 13 - 2 4 - 00 0 56 - CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

IN RE MONTY GEORGE STUMBAUGH

ON APPEAL FROM THE 332ND DISTRICT COURT OF HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Peña Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras
On January 25 , 2024 , a ppellant Liborio Plata f iled a notice of appeal from a n order granting a presuit deposition under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 202. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 2 02

. The order subject to appeal provides that Monty George Stumbaugh is entitled to
take appellant ’ s deposition “ in anticipation of suit

. ” See id. R. 202.1. On February 2, 2024, the Clerk of this Court advised appellant that it appeared
that there was no t a final, appealable order. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3 (a) ; In re Jorden , 249 S.W.3d 416, 419 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding) ( holding t hat a ruling on a Rule 2022 petition constitutes a final, appealable order “ only if [the pre

- suit deposition is] sought from someone against whom suit is not anticipated ” and is neither final nor appealable when

“ sought from an anticipated defendant ” ). The Clerk informed appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if this defect was not cured. The Clerk also requested appellant to pay the $205.00 filing fee for the notice of appeal within ten days. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 5 ( “ A party who is not excused by s tatute or these rules from paying costs must pay

— at the time an item is presented for filing

— whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just. ” ); T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN . § 51.207 (delineating the required fees and costs in an appellate court). On February 20, 2024, the Clerk notified appellant that he was delinquent in submitted the filing fee for the notice of appeal and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if the fili ng fee was not paid. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 42.3(b), (c). The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file , is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed. To date, appellant has not responded to the Clerk ’ s notice s, correct ed the defect in the appeal, or pa id the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See id. R. 42.3(a), (b), (c).

DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice Delivered and filed on the 2 1st day of March , 202 4

.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Neuromodulation
Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Christopher G. Chavez, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate,
effective as of May 15, 2003.

| |                               
| | ------------------------------
| | /s/ Christopher G. Chavez     
| |                               
| | Name: Christopher G. Chavez   
| | Title: Chief Executive Officer

Note: The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 302.201*et seq.*).                

The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions to Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in  appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2007-0066.                

*Date Filed:*                     January 20, 2015.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion to Modify Scope:*                     February 10, 2015.                

*Description:*                     Application of Hainan Airlines Co., Ltd. (“Hainan Airlines”) requesting an amendment to Hainan Airlines' foreign air carrier permit to enable it to engage in scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail between (i) Beijing, People's Republic of China (PEK), on the one hand, and San Jose, California (SJC), on the other hand, and (ii) Shanghai, People's Republic of China (PVG), on the one hand, and Seattle, Washington (SEA), on the other hand. Hainan Airlines also requests exemption authority to the extent necessary so that it may exercise the rights  requested in this application prior to the issuance of an amended foreign air carrier permit.                

 Barbara J. Hairston,

Supervisory Dockets Officer, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2015-05626 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4910-9x-P
|              |  |                
|------------- |  | ---------------
|CERTIFICATION |  | Exhibit (31)(1)



I, David A. Woodle certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of C-COR.net Corp.;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                       |  |  |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------
|                       |  | 
|Date: February 6, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/ David A. Woodle                    
|                       |  |  |  |                                        
|                       |  |  |  | David A. Woodle Chief Executive
Officer
Federal Implementation for Interstate Transport of Pollution Affecting Visibility and Best Available

Retrofit Technology Determination; New Mexico The docket for the Federal Implementation Plan can be found at Docket ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 Links for some key documents from that action can be found below. Proposed rule (1/05/2011) :  NM041.001a Approvals and Promulgations of Implementation Plans: New Mexico; Federal Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport of Pollution Affecting Visibility and Best Available Retrofit Technology Determination -- Comment period extended to April 4, 2011 Document ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 - 0001 Technical Support Document (TSD) :  NM041.003 Technical Support Document: Visibili ty Modeling for BART Determination - San Juan Generating Station - New Mexico Document ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 - 0003 TSD reference material:  NM041.200 - TSD ref : File List Document ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 - 0014

 NM041.200 - TSD ref -- Additional Documents: File List Document ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 - 0020 Final Rule (8/22/2011) :  NM041.8000 Approvals and Promulgations of Implementation Plans: New Mexico; Federal Implementation Plan for Interstate Transport of Pollution Affecti ng Visibility. 53 pages r8m Document ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 - 0126 Response to Comments:  NM041.8001 Complete Response to Comments for New Mexico Regional Haze S IP. 144 pages 0.835 MB r8m7R Document ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 - 0127  NM041.8002 Exhibit 1 RTC Revised Cost Analysis. r8m Document ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 - 0128  NM041.8003 Exhibit 2 Best SCR RetrofitDocument ID: EPA - R06 - OAR - 2010 - 0846 - 0129