alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.4

 

Section 302 – Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

 

 

I, Ricardo Reyes, certify that:

 

1.         I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.;

 

2.         Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.         Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

 

Date: May 17, 2013

 

/s/ Ricardo Reyes       

                                                                                  Ricardo Reyes 

Chief Financial Officer
Table of Contents

**Exhibit 13.2**

 

 

Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.         I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A. (the “Company”).

 

2.         The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and

 

3.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated: June 11, 2010

 

 

                                                                                  /s/ Ricardo Reyes      

                                                                                  Chief Financial Officer

 

 

----
REF ID:A363301 

• 

* 

* 4 * * & ~ * * * * 

4:'he 1ft!c;c;c~ !m.v.f.ne1 on er amu1; tho 11th dJq ~ AUgUst 1944.• 

made appllca.ticm .for let'fiiom patent :rcr an !az~ In Qeotr1ca1 

31aten ( eer.la1 mllbor 549•<*>', a..'ld Jarinc th1s dq nvolmd a pcsar 

at attomey glwn cm. GLf' about; the Jn dq or A.usuat 1944 to WUUa'!'l J>. 

Ball, ot tho Ott:lco or the Cid.et Rtgnnl ot:riee, bare1:f' appoints 

Jlem7" s. sta.urf'o:r, of Ar~ Colm1U1 VJl'gjlda, b1s attormv, with 

"Um, to ~ alteratlor.tt and ~ts ~ to l"80eiw the pa.tea•, 

and to _.. •.&Wt all lJm:lneo:J in tbo Fatcftt ott:loo, oaanected tl:lo:oo'Dith. 

~, m tbo oouuv or Arl!ngtm and state ot V!rg:bda tlda 

1"'6l. diq ot I ~ •••U=•=.:-_._f A. ». 1947. 

Ira iMLAi!WOU aa•:m.. -~rlttiS'~ ·~-:;..."\._,.._.,..A' 

'1'11iam ... ~, AR>ol"oa.nt 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit 10.1

 

Compensation of the Chairman of the Board

 

On May 3, 2011, Board of Directors of Guaranty Bancorp (the “Company”) elected director Edward B. Cordes to serve as the Chairman of the Board.  In connection with such election, the Board approved a $45,000 annual cash retainer for the position of the Chairman of the Board, in addition to the annual cash retainer of $50,000 paid to each non-management director (i.e., for an aggregate $95,000 annual cash retainer).  All other terms of director compensation, previously disclosed in the Company’s 2011 Proxy Statement, remain the same.
Assumption Agreement executed by PayEase Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd.



 Exhibit 10.19 
 ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT 
 For good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged PayEase Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. hereby assumes the obligations of PayEase Beijing (HK) Limited and its subsidiaries under that certain Nominee Agreement dated December 3, 2010 by
and between Loyalty Alliance Enterprise Corporation and its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and PayEase Beijing (HK) Limited and its subsidiaries, on the other hand. This Assumption Agreement is effective as of the date of that certain Equity
Transfer Agreement by and among PayEase (HK) Limited, Beijing PayEase E-Commerce Co., Ltd. and Beijing Jinquan Travel Service Co., Ltd. pursuant to which PayEase Beijing (HK) Limited transferred its equity interest in PayEase Technology (Beijing)
Co., Ltd. Loyalty Alliance Enterprise Corporation and its subsidiaries are express third party beneficiaries under this Assumption Agreement. 
  

			
	PAYEASE TECHNOLOGY (BEIJING) CO., LTD.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Abraham Jou

		
	Name:	 	 Abraham Jou

		
	Title:	 	 Director
' I ~ 

REF ID:A72469 

SECRET .. 

I !'l:C o: -"I"--"'· -...... r! ":' L ':,";ii --:.'----=.--·- ...... .., ........ ~ ..... Date ?iled Y..~Y 20. J943 

i-~i\CI:: 

1'0: 

::R: 

AHE .l3ASSY LOHDOX 

MIL!D WAS,INGTON 

4825 

·-

Ti1:ie ?iled 2229Z ---=-=::.:=:==~----

YIHILE· VIEWING J COli!·:.ERCIAL SECTIOM I ASK:S:D TH:!!l ABOUT' 

GOSHO -TRAFFIC~ w:;ICn LAST I iZA.RD vrn:. ,n!!~aE NOT READING 

(TAYLOR TO STRO. G FOR CORDi:Rl.!AN ) • TH:::Y HA 'VE N!:V3:R S~N 

AMY GOSHO IN CODE BUT HAVE A FE"~;r IN CLEAR, EX..4.!a'LE FOLLO\V: 

TO JAJ F.n.01.1 H EIGHT E Tit:F.E3!; ~-?AB.:!LE OSK BA?~GKO!~ 549, 

11, 14, 1438, LC GOSHO OS.Ila; TEXT 82/97 XEK:.IP..IEKI?.: 

HONJITUSYO~ID'NO TUNJISOKINSITA IRI:s:YOEIYOS~O K~"TEHAITIU 

OJ~:S::HE?:J!SU?.U q-OSHO. T:~ SAY GOSHO IS N.i:.~ ~F J 

HOM! :ER.IIAL FIRPi WITH B:nA?~CnES SAIGON ~NG!COK CANTON AND .. ELS~ ."lHERO::, NOT IMt>ORTANT AHD TRAFFIJ OF L!TTL~ INTER~ST. 

T~EY AR~ I~"TE:fi.~STED IN C-OSEO cone T?J:.?FIC AND SUGG-ES~ YOU 

SE!lD TH~ Sek~, POSSIBLY TP.:!!Y CAN Il)ENT!FY IT Au:oNG 

VARIOUS J COlf!".!:RCIAL CODES '!I":- ICH T"!!~ A~E INTO 

AJ :rr_4 .. l-.::6:.::5"---

:J-:t te Co:!~leted },ll\Y 21, 1943 

T l.!'::!.C cc:-.~· let a d._ ... l=-=9~5~5-Z=---

ljT._,.~ ,.,, _ T"' •. .a-... -.. -J.;:.·.:. • .. .., o':"" _ r.. ,. j'I' 1=".,, .....v. C" - coFY CF r::-:!s I3eSAG:::;:. rs ~-c?..3:::::o:c:: 

..... 

.. I

: : . 

~ 

[

· ..... ;· 

r:: ~:::.:.=. F . • , ... :·· I• •••• ... . ... I" ••• ::· ·:·::. 

t .. ::::::· r· . =.···· 

~ = .· .· t •. I: ••. 

"'. 

: ··. • .... 

:. .· ~:· ·: ... r ...•• 

:o··. ·::··. ::·. ·::.· 

r·.: .·.-.· 

: ·: ·.::. 

o:.· • ::: 

:".. ·:: .. :. ···:::· 

.:.: ... · 

:··· .. . .... ·.· 

: •• ···:·.r. 

: ··--···:: 

:.. :··: 

:- •• ·:::i: 

-:. ....... :: 

:.· .· .·· :·· .· ::.:. 

":. ·· .. · ~. · .. · 

. 

·. . . 

........... 

. 

: .... 

•• i:.: 

'"'"":.'" .. ·: 

:: .. ··:. 

..... ..si 

:·. 

i···
1. AS•20 AS-80 6 Peb 4? 

REF ID:A6557. 

cor~FIDE~h1,a.;U, 

Draft ot •am•ript •n.. Ettects of World War II 

oa '119 Securi\7 of I. s. Waftl. CoaunicaUou• 

1. !h• b&aie doem .. t •the Ettecta of World War II on t.he Securi\T of U. s. 

law.l Co-.n1-tiou• baa been read with eouiderable iateraat. It ia a.a excel• 

lat ecapilatioa and discueaioa or &l'J'Ptograpb.ic aecnui.t)' during the war. 

2. Ia Yi• ot tlle tact that there are reteracea ia tile docuaeat. t.o TICCW, 

lt le 90U1d.•red tu.t the replatiou with regard to claaaitication ot TICta 

•tertal will require a elasa1t1atioa or TOP SECRET. !he auggestioa aight be 

ll&d.e tbat t1£CICC 1houlc:l be coanlted on the t.n>• ot at.rial whieh eu ~ ext.noted tna TICOM reports and oa tae claa~itica:t.io• tllat such extraeta •bould 

b•r. 

3. A abor comieat ia •ad• with regard 'to paragraph 4 on page 8. It ia 

stated that the lapa.neff illtercepted all circuits wh1.cll eould be copied. Alt.bough 

thie at..t.•t. is oorreot, it aight be better to strees the known tact tllat there 

n1 DO iat.l"Cept wbateTer ot radio teletJPe circuits. It ia recommuded that the 

word ••anual• be insertf!d prior to th.a wrd •circuits." 

4. Reeeipt ot a copy or the lawl doc1111ent ill fhlal rorm will be wch 

appreciated b1 Seauritl1 Dirtsion. 

1 ?Ml 

Memo from CBO, U.!:'•20-I, 

21 laa 47, subJ as abo'N, 

111 iul 

A. ~,IlfKOY 

Chiet, Seeur1t," Di'rieion 

Extensioa 241 

l 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-24-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Exhibit 31.2

|   | SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION |
|--------|------------------------------------------|

I, Alan L. Cross, Chief Financial Officer of Wind Energy America Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 1O-QSB of Wind Energy America Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

| Date: May 20, 2008 | /s/Alan L. Cross |
|--------------------|------------------|

|   | Alan L. Cross |
|--------|---------------|

                                                                      Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM XEROX 
CREDIT CORPORATION'S MARCH 31, 1997 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN 
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1000000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,953
<ALLOWANCES>                                       118
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,961
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,960
<BONDS>                                          3,373
<COMMON>                                            23
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         456
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,961
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    88
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  53
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     32
<INCOME-TAX>                                        13
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 19
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        19
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


        

</TABLE>
#### Brown, Appellant, *v.*Leonard, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Brown v. Leonard*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 593.]

(No. 99-916

Submitted August 25, 1999

Decided September 29, 1999.)

*Lawrence Broim, pro se.*

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Michele M. Schoeppe,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals for the reasons stated in its opinion. Neither a claimed violation of the right to a speedy trial nor a mere sentencing error is cognizable in habeas corpus. *Russell v. Mitchell*(1999), 84 Ohio St.3d 328, 329, 703 N.E.2d 1249, 1249-1250; *Heddleston v. Mack*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 213, 702 N.E.2d 1198. Further, Brown waived the additional claims he raises in this appeal, *e.g.,*ineffective assistance of counsel, by failing to raise them below, and such claims are also not cognizable in habeas corpus. *State ex rel. Porter v. Cleveland Dept. of Pub. Safety*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 258, 259, 703 N.E.2d 308, 309; *Thomas v. Huffman*(1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 266, 267, 703 N.E.2d 315, 315-316.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
Table H-9-1. OTC MM5 Meteorological Model Configuration

Science Options Configuration Details/Comments

Model Code MM5 Version 3.6

Horizontal Grid Mesh 36km/12km

36-km grid 149x129 cells

12-km grid 175x175 cells

Vertical Grid Mesh 29 layers

Grid Interaction No feedback Two-way nesting

Initialization Eta first guess fields/LittleR

Boundary Conditions Eta first guess fields/LittleR

Microphysics Simple Ice

Cumulus Scheme Kain-Fritsch 36km/12km grids

Planetary Boundary Layer High-resolution Blackadar PBL

Radiation Simple cooling

Vegetation Data USGS 24 Category Scheme

Land Surface Model Five-Layer Soil model

Shallow Convection None

Sea Surface Temperature Do not update SST

Thermal Roughness Default

Snow Cover Effects None

4D Data Assimilation Analysis Nudging: 36km/12km

Integration Time Step 75 seconds

Simulation Periods 2002

Platform Linux Cluster Done at UMD
1

Medina, Dayana

From: Reitter, Annabeth <Annabeth.Reitter@domtar.com>

Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2015 3:56 PM

To: Medina, Dayana

Subject: Domtar Ashdown Mill Power Boiler #2

Attachments: removed.txt

Hi Dayana,

In our discussions regarding the appropriate SO2 BART emission limit for the Domtar Ashdown Mill Power

Boiler #2, a key factor is the baseline period; that is, whether the BART reduction is applied to the average SO2

emissions from the 2001‐2003 BART baseline period or the 2011‐2013 timeframe.  As expressed on the call,

we believe the 2001‐2003 BART baseline period is the appropriate baseline for this calculation for the

following reasons:

 The SO2 emissions from baseline years of 2001‐2003 were used as a basis for including Power Boiler 2 in

the BART program and for determining the unit is subject to BART.

 If the BART program had been expeditiously implemented as contemplated under the original BART rules,

the baseline of 2001‐2003 would have been used.

 Use of a baseline that is 10 years later (2011‐2013) does not account for the changes that occurred at the

mill in reducing SO2 emissions.  For the period of 2001‐2003, the average tons of SO2 emissions from

Power Boiler 2 is 2,078 tons.  For the period of 2011‐2013, the average tons of SO2 emissions from

Power Boiler 2 is 1,229 tons.  That equates to an over 40% decrease in SO2 emissions from the 2001‐

2003 BART baseline period.

 Substantial reductions in use of coal occurred over this 10‐year period, while use of low SO2 fuels

(TDF/Bark) substantially increased and contributed to the reductions in SO2 emissions from the BART

baseline period.

 By using the lower SO2 emissions from the 2011‐2013 period, the mill is being penalized for its voluntary

efforts to significantly reduce SO2 emissions.

 In other situations involving pulp and paper mills (Georgia‐Pacific, Wisconsin, 2012), the state with U.S.

EPA concurrence used 2002 as the baseline period in its emission reduction calculations.

 In the approved portions of the Arkansas SIP, U.S. EPA agreed (with respect to the cost of controls)

baseline emissions may reflect past practices.  Similarly, in U.S. EPA’s BART guidelines, reference is

made to calculating baseline emissions based on a continuation of past practices (Guidelines, at

39167).  By analogy, the percent reduction in SO2 should also be applied to past practice as reflected in

the 2001‐2003 timeframe.

Thank you for further consideration of this important matter.  Please let me know if there are any questions or

if you would like to further discuss.

Best Regards,

Annabeth
2

Annabeth Reitter

Corporate Manager, Environmental Regulation 

T 715-886-7785 | C 715-459-9257 The linked image cannot be displayed. The file may have been moved, renamed, or deleted. Verify that the link points to the correct file and location.

Domtar

301 Point Basse Avenue

Nekoosa, WI 54457

Domtar reminds you to print responsibly. Learn more about paper as a sustainable choice at paperbecause.com 

This email is for the exclusive use of the addressee and is subject to Domtar Confidentiality Notice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Effective date:*                         March 12, 2015.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on March 4, 2015, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 116 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov*, Docket Nos. MC2015-36, CP2015-47.                

Stanley F. Mires,

Attorney, Federal Requirements.

[FR Doc. 2015-05635 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 23.2**
**CONSENT OF NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.**
We consent to the references to us and to estimates of reserves contained in “Part I, Item 1 and2. Business and Properties - Natural Gas and Oil Reserves” in this Annual Report on Form 10-Kof The Houston Exploration Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 and in HoustonExploration’s previously filed Registration Statements (and any prospectus supplement thereto)with file numbers as follows: (i) 333-78843 dated May 20, 1999, 333-113659 dated March 16,2004 and 333-120000 dated December 3, 2004, on Form S-3; (ii) 333-106836 dated December 4,2003, on Form 4; and (iii) 333-36977 dated October 1, 1997, 333-47370 dated October 5, 2000,333-59698 dated April 27, 2001, 333-75264 dated December 17, 2001, 333-99799 dated September19, 2002 and 333-117789 dated July 30, 2004, on Form S-8.      NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.
• 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT: 

Joint Use ot Code Room in Manila 1 Philippine Islands 

To: State Dept 

From: ASA 

BRIEF SUMMARY: 

Date of Communication: 20 Feb 48 

Date of Basic Document: 

ASA has recently received a request .from USMA in Manila, Philippine Islands for permission to use 3o1nt code room facilities with the 

Embass7 in Manila. It is beleived that such arrangements are in the 

inter•st or economy and efticiency, and that authorization permitting joint use ot the code room is advisable. 

Your comments on the above proposal~requested. 

Classifier: Mrs Beylre 

Typist: Mrs Beyke 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

FILE: Department • State 

WDGAS Form No. 1493 7 October 1946 44052 

Routed to: File 

Date of Classifying: IJxilfJlx 

27 Feb 48
I ) -~ 

~ .. nr s~ s. Ca!na ~~Gt Stctarda 

JaoS tmaw .t.YWW&t 

la Aae.tes 24, c.u...~ 

... Pl\lt-~~ C&l.rmt 

~---.... "---

1 } 

lurbf, ~ ~ i.tts- at 6 .l\1pst l?SJ 1:o :tr.~ 

t.eaolova~ 

lime *'• ~1.1 a eu leav~ tQr W> ~ \W..11 

.aw ma GQQa '9 w at.tent.icm. ~ t.Nvlll ~ er. 

~ ~up to l'U4 ~ ao1 ~ ilzrlinea ~ 

&dca:o • ~~. ~ o.t'dent wUl be Rn\ to 1ba 

•t!"••tslm ~ t1121"fVIJitv ot lllirr:d.8 f-att ~ 

Cll'~. 

Get AG 

CJ/iS 

S/ASST 

>Var Pro!. Oa.1rns1 Cha.irman o! the 'NSASAB will bo attending ll02tla 

or tho Board•a spec1al atudy group aessions st.art.int: .31 A~<'Y\JSt 

thru 11 Sept. In h1fJ ltr o.t 6 Au,z ha requested. hie travel orders 

read u •tated. above. 

I. 1'. McDonald/Asst to S/liSST/ll Aug )3-Qby 

§pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a _ ~
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS




As independent public accountant's, we hereby consent to the
incorporation by reference of our report included in this Form
10-K, into the Company's previously filed Registration Statement
File No. 33-83958, dated September 14, 1994, and the Company's
previously filed Registration Statement No. 33-86354, dated
November 14, 1994.


\s\ Arthur Andersen LLP

St. Louis, Missouri,
  November 25, 1996