alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SAT Report 

PMN Number: P-10-0235

SAT Date: 3/5/2010 

Related cases: 

Health related cases: 

 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 1

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-S,E,MM,L; DEVEL; SENS-S; AQUATOX 

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-10-0235

FATE: 

Liquid with MP < 25 EC (E) 

log Kow = 5.77 (E) 

S = 11.2 mg/L at 25 EC (E) 

VP = 2.0E-4 torr at 25 EC (NOMO5) 

BP = 326 EC (NOMO5) based on 127 EC @ 0.5 mm Hg (M) 

H = 1.58E-4 (E) 

log Koc = 4.43 (E) 

log Fish BCF = 2.10 (E) 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
log Fish BAF = 2.75 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption 

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk 

Sorption to soils/sediments = strong - v.strong 

Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 7 hrs 

Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 8 da 

Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 9.7 hr via OH radical 

PBT Potential: P1B1 

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl 

 Health:

 Health Summary: Expect poor absorption via all routes (pchem). Concern 

for dermal sensitization and irritation to all tissues based on submitted test data. Also concern for 

developmental toxicity based on nitrogen heterocyclic compounds. 

 Test Data: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; rat oral LD50 

>300 and <2000 mg/kg, signs of GI tract irritation; moderate skin irritation in rabbits; (+) for 

skin sensitization in a mouse local lymph node assay at 10 and 25% ai, (-) at 5% ai 

 Ecotox:

Test 

Organism

Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.081 or *

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.080 or*

green algal 96-h EC50 0.20

fish chronic value 0.011

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.017

algal _ chronic 

value

0.14

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic compounds; 

SAR chemical class = pyridine; MW 219; liquid with unknown mp (M); log Kow = 5.77 (EPI); 

S = 11.2 mg/L at 20 °C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients 

and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L; 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs neutral organic chemicals

SAR Class pyridine

Ecotox Category 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
99-1240.

#### Ameritech Ohio v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 97-155-TP-CSS. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio.

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the parties are to file notice in this court upon resolution of case No. C2-99-552 pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
CERTIFICATIONS  I, R. Halsey Wise, certify that:1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intergraph
      Corporation;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
      statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
      make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
      statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
      this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
      information included in this report, fairly present in all material
      respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
  report;4.
    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
      case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and5.
    The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
      based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
      registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
      functions):a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.Date:  August 13, 2003/s/
      R. Halsey WiseR.
      Halsey WiseChief
      Executive Officer
99-1139.

#### State ex rel. Murin v. Nash.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus by David Murin.

*Sua sponte,*cause dismissed.

Moyer, C. J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1385

GERTRUDE E. JORDAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (CA-03-

638-RWT)

Submitted: July 28, 2004 Decided: August 17, 2004

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gertrude E. Jordan, Appellant Pro Se. H. Dean Bouland, Jr., Leslie

John Williams, Jr., BOULAND & BRUSH, L.L.C., Baltimore, Maryland,

Lisa K. Burrow, GENERAL CONFERENCE OF SEVENTH-DAY ADVENTISTS,

Silver Spring, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gertrude E. Jordan appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing her discrimination action. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district

court’s orders. See Jordan v. General Conference of Seventh-Day

Adventists, No. CA-03-638-RWT (D. Md. Feb. 25, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
exv4w2









Exhibit 4.2




Execution Copy




NOTE GUARANTY





      NOTE GUARANTY dated as of September 30, 2008 executed by the undersigned Guarantor (the
“Undersigned”).




     1. Capitalized terms used in this Note Guaranty are used as defined in Neenah Foundry
Company’s 12 1/2% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (including the form of indenture
attached thereto and incorporated therein and the Note Guaranty dated as of December 29,
2006 attached thereto and incorporated therein) (the “Notes” and, collectively with the
form of indenture and the Note Guaranty, the “Indenture”) in the original principal sum of
$75,000,000 issued in favor of Tontine Capital Partners, L.P.




     2. The Undersigned agrees to be a Guarantor of the Notes and to be bound by the terms
of the Indenture and the Notes applicable to Guarantors, including, but not limited to,
Article 10 of the Indenture.




     3. This Guaranty shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the internal
laws of the State of New York.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MORGAN’S WELDING, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Jeffrey S. Jenkins
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Jeffrey S. Jenkins 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Corporate Vice President — Finance
and

 Interim Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 



Note Guaranty



1
Jf:r. John. c. HcPberaon 

Vice Pre114ent 

REF ID:A64710 

i3 September 1954 

international. ltuai?leaa Ma.chi.net Corp. 

Wo "'411on .A.venue 

lev York 221 low York 

Dear Joluu 

I Nnd. 1'QU under •epe.raw cover t~ ~ copy or the 

'brochure on the nstaplea Alphabet ExbibitiQn Vbich w 

d.i1cuaaed yeaterday. I can tell you that the -.n who 

u•1•ted m.?at in uaemblUia the •tei-19.l *'°1 pl"epe.riJJa 

the l.egenda, Dr. Dir1llger, 11 tn:'Qba.blf the greate•t living 

e.uthority on the aubject. Me a lOOk altlo at the names 

® the Advisory Panel. 

1 encl.otse herewith a. 4ratt ot a lcrtter which l m1gh.t 

1•n4. )Ir. W..teon. Plea.le eke 1uch cba.?>gee u you think 

a4v1aable an4 nturn to me. 

Incl: 

a/• 

It va.a nicfJ to Me ;you yaaterda¥. 

Sincere17, 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352\3
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 26, 2010

s0222 

# Order

February 26, 2010

139572

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139572 COA: 291321 Emmet CC: 05-002399-FH BRADFORD CARL ROSS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the July 16, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, a nd it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 13.1 

 

 

Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.         I am the Chief Executive Officer of Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A. (the “Company”).

 

2.         The Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”); and

 

3.         The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  April 27, 2012

 

 

                                                                                  /s/ Patricio Jottar          

                                                                                  Chief Executive Officer

 

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6636** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. PAUL BERNARD MITCHELL, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. Malcolm J. Howard , Senior District Judge. ( 5:09

- cr - 00382

- H

- 1; 5:12

- cv - 00471

- H )

Submitted : July 25 , 2013 Decided: July 30, 2013

Before GREGORY , DAVIS , and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Paul Bernard Mitchell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions ar e not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Paul Bernard Mitchell , Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or ju dge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court de nies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484

- 85 (2000)
. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mitchell has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 1036 Directorate ID: 2010 - SW - 088 - AD Helicopter Model: Agusta S.p.A. (Agusta) Model AB139 and AW139 Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 26 Helicopters in the US Registry. Reason : This action is prompted by some in - flight emergencies due to internal corrosion of the MAU circuit card assemblies. This action requires inspecting certain modules and connectors for corrosion, cleaning if corrosion is found on the connectors, replacing modules if corrosion is found on the modules , and modification of the Number 2 Modular Avionic Unit ventilation duct. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 360,738 (replace) plus $440 (modification) Labor per Helicopter ( 8 x $ 8 5 /work-hour) $ 680 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ 361,858 Total US Fleet Cost $ 9,408,308 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: George Schwab
REF ID:A67219 I 

I 

' 

-

leri.11 • \ \o~ ~ 

'='\ ~ "?~ \ \... \' 'S 3 

bar Acll.lnl Joseph n. .. Jleda:ln. u:m, :let. 

Yice hea1.den' 

wan.m tftd.on 1'el.e&r.i;pb. Compm;J' 

l.40S o sv.t. 1.v. 

W.Uhtn.&ton,, D. C. 

Dtar Adld.ral JltldMn I 

I ~f.e the lollow.1Dg rtoa a peraonal lllt.ter dated 28 IW'ch l9S) 

tioa 111 td..ml .Bod. Bq:fll.:ln of Z•• Svlt.~1 

•i4th naud to tbs fe2.ekr.Jt>t.oA. U it. la not. too llUCh ~~l!I- I •ul.d apprea!ate it. it JOU ooll.l.4 pt• \be a.DAol"MUon obtatn.U•, al• u to U. pr'.loe. Our 

ilit.e,.1t 1a pr~ a or cut'iont,", Gd n wodd b-q 

0.. -.ctd.ms on1,y U tba pzlco 1• low mcqh.• 

Ir. liqeU.n1 u iou pftibabl.J .,, -11 a•ua. 1• \\lo bald of tha 

ftn tha\ am~act\J,tffa dJ7PtA>-dovlces. 'Ille t.lN'• headquartera ued 

to be ill ltockhola UM! •Wl 97 be then, al thi11.11h the Jaladquartar.s 

or a aev nmtd1a17 :b .,. 1n !\Jg. I mq add thil t 1n all ov ,,_,Sn&• 

td.t.b Mr. B.tceUa bet bu 4aaomt.rated a bl&h order ot mteplt.J Ill! 

iri.Le'blorthlnea. 

X 1d..U 'M clad to to~ e.r 1Dtorut1on 1V" Mt be &blJJ t.o 

ob\dn aa to t.bO pl'S.cee, ll!d.p;d.Dg coats. •to., ot OA9 or botb of 

two Toltb'IPt;:iu Jllebinea I lmdantlmd are a\\1.1 av.Uabl.e. Oa Ua 

~t.her band, lhoul.d 1011 w W.tern UD!on Id.alb t.o COi'ns;>osv.I d1notq 

Id.th Ma, • letter addremlOd u to'll.ows will ra~h htat 

Ir. lom c. w. Da&elln 

zva 

Swl tzerlancl 

~J.n& J'O\A tor JOUr covt.eq, .n1 with cordial P'8*t.1l'lllt•• 

:r. -· 

CCI AG 

C/S 

S/AS~ 

M/R1 Selt-explana to17. 

W.CLLIM« F • f'JWDIAti 

lpaJ1al. A•iltan\ 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
EXHIBIT 32.1

PSI CORPORATION
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David Foni,
the Chief Executive Officer of PSI Corporation (the Company), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                    |  |                         
|------------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: June 24, 2010 |  | /s/ David
 Foni         
|                    |  |                         
|                    |  |                         
|                    |  | David Foni              
|                    |  | Chief
 Executive Officer

---
____ _ BEF ID : A6 6155 __ ---

Dr. v. Jt. Q. kker 

Vice Pro•id.ent and. General W.ne.e;er 

llcct.ro:dca X>1:~181on 

General neatric Ca::paoy 

iyn.CUM1 lfrr.r York 

Dear Dr. Balter 1 

... !alt 

Jtecoipt ot your lettor or u March 1a a.cknmrl~cd. 

I n.gret that rou v1U bo w.'ble <to atwnd. the f'ir•t 

~·· 

coveriJli 

metina ~ tvo or 

da1' 

\be 

period 

brd. 

vlll 

Xt u 

M expected IUCh that 

that 

absence 

the ~ 

troa 

't.b.a fi.nt. 4'Y" v1ll t\Ot. ~11 intcrtare vith 1rJ1.tr uaeful 

panicip&t.icm 1n the procei:l:1nga ot tbe eecond ~· Ienco 

l ~ it Jl1«ht l>e -11 wa:rth~vhtle tor rati to •ttend tha .. ting Gil the IHJ¢0nd. dlq, 21 .J»rU1 it' JW CaQ. ~ it. 

!he necea1o3cy ar4era vill 'Ms ...Ued. ~o you ii:\ the mar~. 

CCI AG 

c/s s/ /..SST (Mr. Friedm.n) 

WILLI>.K , • J'Rli00..1( 

lbr:eeuti·H ~ntar1 

llA Scienti:t'ia NtvUOJ')" lloft.rd 

M/R t Acknowledgment o-t Dr. Baker 1 s l.tr dated ll Mar 54. Dr. 

:Be.ker ia unable to &ttend t'irat day or NSASAB iooeting to be 

held ~ril 20 ... 21, because or GE annual meeting. 

M.M.Feleraki/S/N3ST/&J493/15 Mar 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<TABLE>
                            EXHIBIT 11
             STATEMENT RE: COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
<CAPTION>
                                   For the Three Months Ended March 31,
                                     1997                    1996
                             ----------------------  ----------------------
                                            Fully                   Fully
                               Primary     Diluted     Primary     Diluted
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
<S>                          <C>         <C>         <C>         <C>
Weighted Average 
  Shares Outstanding:
    Common Stock             12,195,891  12,195,891  12,195,891  12,195,891
    Shares Available 
      Under Options (1)               -           -      90,516      90,516
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Weighted Average Common
  and Common Equivalent
  Shares Outstanding         12,195,891  12,195,891  12,286,407  12,286,407
                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
Net Income (Loss)              ($63,494)   ($63,494)   $147,634    $147,634
                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
Earnings (Loss) per Share        ($0.01)     ($0.01)      $0.01       $0.01
                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

                                   For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
                                     1997                    1996
                             ----------------------  ----------------------
                                           Fully                   Fully
                              Primary     Diluted     Primary     Diluted
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Weighted Average 
  Shares Outstanding:
    Common Stock             12,195,891  12,195,891  12,195,891  12,195,891
    Shares Available 
      Under Options (1)               -           -     112,052     112,052 
                             ----------  ----------  ----------  ----------
Weighted Average Common
  and Common Equivalent
  Shares Outstanding         12,195,891  12,195,891  12,307,943  12,307,943
                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
Net Income (Loss)             ($141,771)  ($141,771)   $400,797    $400,797
                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========
Earnings (Loss) per Share        ($0.01)     ($0.01)      $0.03       $0.03
                             ==========  ==========  ==========  ==========

(1) Outstanding stock options granted under the Company's stock option
    plans and other grants outside of the Company's plans are considered
    common stock equivalents for the purpose of earnings per share data;
    however, they are excluded from the 1996 computations because the
    effect of their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40305 

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSÉ ANTONIO SALDIVAR-GONZALEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-99-CR-417-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 14, 2000

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

José Antonio Saldivar-Gonzalez (Saldivar) appeals his

conviction and 77-month sentence following his plea of guilty to

illegal re-entry into the United States after deportation in

violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Saldivar argues that the felony

conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been

charged in the indictment. He acknowledges that his argument is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224

(1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court
No. 00-40305 

-2-

review in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 120 S. Ct. 2348

(2000). Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See

Apprendi, 120 S. Ct. at 2361-62 & n.15. Saldivar’s argument is

foreclosed. See Almendarez-Torres, 523 U.S. at 235. 

Accordingly, Saldivar’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.