alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1962 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1962

   To authorize 2 additional district judgeships for the district of 
                               Colorado.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2015

Mr. Bennet (for himself and Mr. Gardner) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize 2 additional district judgeships for the district of 
                               Colorado.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO.

    (a) Additional District Judgeships.--The President shall appoint, 
by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 2 additional district 
judges for the district of Colorado.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table in section 
133(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking the item 
relating to Colorado and inserting the following:

``Colorado.................................................         9''.
 

    (c) Effective Date.--This Act, and the amendments made by this Act, 
shall take effect on January 21, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
# CE2004078EN.01032101.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/321 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/321

---

(2004/C 78 E/0329)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3793/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(11 December 2003)

Subject:   Update on funding for the city of Pisa under the Leonardo programme

Subject:

In reply to my earlier question E-1070/03 (1) asking whether the city of Pisa had submitted projects and obtained funding under the Leonardo programme, the Commission said on 8 March 2003 that the city had not submitted any application.

1

As regards the proportion of funds managed centrally, can the Commission say whether any new projects have been submitted since that date and what the outcome was?

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-3765/03, E-3766/03, E-3767/03, E-3768/03, E-3769/03, E-3770/03, E-3771/03, E-3772/03, E-3773/03, E-3774/03, E-3775/03 and E-3793/03

given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(15 January 2004)

(15 January 2004)

Some of the funds awarded under the Leonardo da Vinci programme are managed decentrally by national agencies, in particular the transnational mobility projects, whose total budget takes up almost 40 % of the annual budget for the programme.

The Honourable Member should contact the national agency in Italy for further information on these projects: ISFOL, Via G.B. Morgagni 30/e, I-00161 Roma, tel. (+39-06) 44.59.01 fax (+39-06) 44.59.04.75.

With regard to the funds managed centrally by the Commission (pilot projects, thematic actions, language skills, transnational networks, reference tools), the search check for the municipalities of Ancona, Carrara, Firenze, Livorno, Macerata, Massa, Perugia, Pisa, Pistoia, Prato, Siena e Terni showed that none of them presented any proposals in the context of the 2003 Leonardo da Vinci call for proposals (selection completed in July 2003).

---

(1)  OJ C 268 E, 7.11.2003, p. 151.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1947 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1947

  To exclude the discharge of certain Federal student loans from the 
                      calculation of gross income.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             August 5, 2015

  Mr. Merkley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To exclude the discharge of certain Federal student loans from the 
                      calculation of gross income.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Income-Based Repayment Debt 
Forgiveness Act''.

SEC. 2. FORGIVENESS OF CERTAIN FEDERAL STUDENT LOANS EXCLUDED FROM 
              INCOME TAX.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (1) of section 108(f) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``any student loan if'' and 
all that follows and inserting ``any student loan if--
                    ``(A) such discharge was pursuant to a provision of 
                such loan under which all or part of the indebtedness 
                of the individual would be discharged if the individual 
                worked for a certain period of time in certain 
                professions for any of a broad class of employers, or
                    ``(B) in the case of a loan made by the United 
                States or an instrumentality or agency thereof, such 
                discharge was pursuant to any Federal program or 
                provision of Federal law which provides for income 
                contingent or income-based repayment of such loan.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to discharges of loans that occur on or after July 1, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 21

                           Subsidiaries of Registrant



Health Micro Data Systems, Inc.

CITATION Professional Services, Inc.



     Both subsidiaries are wholly-owned by Registrant.


                                                                         Page 21



<PAGE>   2


                SCHEDULE VIII - VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
                                 (in thousands)



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                            ADDITIONS       ADDITIONS
                                            BALANCE AT      CHARGED TO      CHARGED TO      DEDUCTIONS      BALANCE AT
                                             BEGINNING      COSTS AND         OTHER          ACCOUNTS         END OF
               DESCRIPTION                   OF PERIOD       EXPENSES        ACCOUNTS       CHARGED OFF       PERIOD
               -----------                   ---------       --------        --------       -----------       ------
<S>                                            <C>             <C>              <C>             <C>            <C>
Year ended March 31, 1997:
   Allowance for Doubtful accounts             $170            $40              --              $48            $162

Year ended March 31, 1998:
   Allowance for Doubtful accounts             $162            $74              --              $31            $205

Year ended March 31, 1999:
   Allowance for Doubtful accounts             $205            $95              --              $88            $212
</TABLE>



                                                                         Page 22
Exhibit 31.1
  CERTIFICATIONS    1.
    I have reviewed this annual report on
    Form 10-K
    (the Report) of Revlon, Inc. (the
    Registrant);  2.
    Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any untrue
    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
    necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
    circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
    financial information included in this Report, fairly present in
    all material respects the financial condition, results of
    operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the
    periods presented in this Report;4.
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I are
    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
    Rules 13a-15(e)
    and
    15d-15(e))
    and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in
    Exchange Act Rules
    13a-15(f)
    and
    15d-15(f))
    for the Registrant and have:          5.
    The Registrants other certifying officer and I have
    disclosed, based on the Companys most recent evaluation of
    internal control over financial reporting, to the
    Registrants auditors and the audit committee of the
    Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
    equivalent functions):        /s/ David L. Kennedy
----------RE-F--Tn--:--A:o6rB·1 

-CC'~iFlD~~·<J=gL~At: . -

l!lr. !! • p. t'!wv1 th 

Vice Prnident ~Qsdoo~.'.:l~ 

6'0 hkon it.net,,. 1iooLJ A•)3 

aw York 13, 168v Tor~ 

Titte.l' *" ~ Ce:nrl th : 

-

hi'-JA.12 0 ::2 b u 

r~ 1 

IA ~d vith dstcla10M J8de .. t ~ lut ....ti?JG ot t.::wt 

..UCM..l Securi~ ~ !lcltti:rtific k\YUo:r;y lo&N, th1A Ai/}!ncy 

~ ~ tbe WtW eo:rt4c't. with t.he ~cl,.lYo i*'Wl ~a 

1a. tbl:t l«llilCr outl.1DcC. iA the ~.. let t.:.:r to :JOU ot 9 f\a'b ... 

~ JSJ~. 

~ :tncl.oee'1 Uat of pa:i:iel. ~a !JxUmtee the e:ut'Nnt ~ or each ~ctiva p&nQl ~. 

9:l tbc ~le~~tious Pwl, tr. ~· s. J'oehler ha.a 

llell:l ~itutcd rar .,.. ave1a a. 11.Nt, m ~e nt.b a MC•~iUltiJAtloo ~ bf' t.~ Ptdlco Corpotti.t.lon. 

Mr. lt°'4Q: t !, M1llc", UQW vtt~ Hc.lpar ~or<J.te·!, bu been 

.adod. 

~ 

to t.Qe ~ecoma&mk:~.tions Panel llit bee;-.u.ae r4 tiie 'QJ.uablo 

~ l;Jf Jd.m u an ~ueer ~ ll4I es ap~J. by 

thie .Afvm,c:;r. 

QQlJ tbooo Vbo al"& ~tl,y l..Ute4 U ~trl:autN ~ ~ 

an 

~tely 

bO eallod. ~tor ~ w!th 

~Y 

the 

'bua.lnesa. 

~Gt~ud..ino 

~ 

tbat. 

eo 

trur; 

l.l'C 

be 

cr;rpto 

ib.\octrioo.tt..?<1 

~ 

-.rcxru bt,>eCJfrtt\S ~in },.ani:;y ~. Tiiil ~t.rmt!.oo can 

aally ~ ~li!l:e:! en tht.tir f.int vtait to tha ~. 

A.I 'the ~tut or ~ !Mivi®aa in ~ pe"OC1ng ar ~~,,,, t"l'\)a" 

~t.c-s ~' rou. YlU 'be ln.f~..l ao t!:ia.t your peJ:al liflt ~ 

'Mbt;t~t 

I • lQQk:J ee ror,Jf);f: 1 to 11ee~ 7Ql at tno iO...zl ~ru ..ttnc; 

or the .lou'1. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

COE> ~ '< le; l:l D - r~~;·r~J..,~~AL ;;:,-_::, ~ ~ . 
C;;ONFiDENTIAL 

~ 

1h1.a lAttter aq be 6=1ua1fied. vben ti.~ a~-

l Iac.l: 

U.tert~t~l~ 

°"VJ'~t 

~ .. s. 84 ~ 

eci All 

c/s 

s I M3ST (Mr. Fried.r:nn) 

·~zrttr'Gl.y, 

VlLLIAM 'I• llUmJ.AN 

~utive~~ 

EA &etet.tifio Mvieor.f loar4. 

M/R; Inf'orJJling Ml:-. Corirlth (Chln ~leconm.Panel) as to the status 

or lli panel m;mibers. 

M.M,'Fe~rsk/8/ASE/J!/EIJ493/5 Mar 54 

I 

CONFIDENTIA~ 

\ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
National Archives and Records Administration

Office a/the Federal Register

Sine rely.

,

September 16, 20tO

FAA

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Room 915 J, Regulations Division

Washington, DC 20591

ATTN: Nancy Molitor, FAA Liaison Officer for the Federal Register

Dear Ms. Molitor:

The material listed in (he attachment is approved fOT incorporation by referenr;;e in 14 CF~ P.art39.

This approval is contingent upon the fmal rule containing any language changes, wh.ich were agreed upon by

our staffs. The approval to incorporate by reference this publication(s) is effective on the effective date of your

final rule. If you wish to enforce some other edition of the publication(s) approved, you must:

I. Publish notice of the change in the Federal Register, and amend the Code of Federal Regulations; and

2. Ensure that a copy of that edition is on file at the Office of the Federal Register; and

3. Notify me in writing of the change.

v/~

~YMO DA.MOSLEY

Director of the Federal Register

Federal Register Attomey: MB

Attaclunent

US mail address: 8601 Adelphi Road, CQllege Park, MD 2074D-60,0l

Office location: 800 North Capitol Street, NW, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20002-4244

Federal Register web sites: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register{/Ild http:/ /www.gpoaccess.gov/nara

. .
incorporation by Reference

Docket No. FAA-2D09-0715; Directorate Identifier 2008-NM-211-AD; Amendment 39-16-132: AD 2010-19-04

EMBRAER Service Bulletin 120-

49-0023

Revision 1 06130/2008

Docket No. fAA-2009-0Bl]; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-41-AD; Amendment 39-16429; AD 2!JIO-19-0]

Rolls-Royce Corporation Alert Service Bulletin Revision 2 06/2212009

AE 3007A-A·72-367

Rolls-Royce Corporation Service Bulletin AE Revision 3 OS/2412010

30Q7A-72-368

Rolls-Royce Corporation Service Bulletin AE Revision 2 11105/2009

3007A-72-369

DockeT No. FAA-2010-0426: Directorate 1dentifier 2009~SW-34-AD.' Amendment 39~16433;AD 2010-19-05

Eurocopler

Eurocopter

Alert Service Bulletin

No. 05.00.49

Alert Service Bulletin

NO.05A011

03f01l2006

03/01/2006

Docket No. FAA-2010-0926.- Directorate Identifier 2010-CE-024~AD; Amendment 39-16435: AD 2010-20-0]

GROB Aircraft AG

GROB Aircraft AG

GROB Aircraft AG

Prillted 91]6/2010

Recair Instruction No_

RI-1121-D17

Repair Instruction No.

RI-,121-D16

Service BuUetin No.:

ASBl121-11311

(14101/2010

0511612010

05118/2010

Page I of I
ex10-2.htm


Exhibit 10.2







FIRST AMENDMENT TO


INX INC. 2008 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN












WHEREAS, INX Inc. (“INX") maintains the INX Inc. 2008 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan");







WHEREAS, Section 19 of the Plan permits amendment to the Plan at any time and for any reason; and







WHEREAS, amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable to increase the number of shares of INX common stock available for purchase under the Plan;







NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that by virtue and in exercise of the amending power reserved to INX under the Plan, the Plan shall be, and hereby is, amended in the following particulars:








	
  

	
1.

	
By substituting the following for the first sentence of section 13(a) of the Plan:













	
  

	
“Subject to adjustment as provided in Section 18, the maximum number of Shares which shall be made available for sale under the Plan shall be one million two-hundred fifty thousand (1,250,000) Shares.”












FURTHER RESOLVED, except as specifically provided hereby, the Plan shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with the provisions thereof; and







FURTHER RESOLVED, this amendment shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of Texas.
99-751.

#### State v. McDade.

Lake App. No. 96-L-197. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1962 

To authorize 2 additional district judgeships for the district of Colorado. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 5, 2015 

Mr. BENNET (for himself and Mr. GARDNER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize 2 additional district judgeships for the district 

of Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS FOR THE 

4 DISTRICT OF COLORADO. 

5 (a) ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGESHIPS.—The Presi6 dent shall appoint, by and with the advice and consent 

7 of the Senate, 2 additional district judges for the district 

8 of Colorado. 

9 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.— 

10 The table in section 133(a) of title 28, United States 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1962 IS

1 Code, is amended by striking the item relating to Colorado 

2 and inserting the following: 

‘‘Colorado ........................................................................................ 9’’. 

3 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This Act, and the amend4 ments made by this Act, shall take effect on January 21, 

5 2017. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
J. Parker Erkmann

T: +1 202 776 2036

perkmann@cooley.com VIA REGULATIONS.GOV & EMAIL

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM March 24 , 2015

Mr. Paul L. Gretch

Director, Office of International Aviation

Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Room W86

- 3163

Washington, DC 20591

Re: DOT

- OST

- 2012

- 0052

– Notice of Additional Codeshare for JetBlue and Emirates

Dear Mr. Gretch:

JetBlue Airways Corporation ( “JetBlue” ) and Emirates hereby give 30 days’ not ice of

their intent to display Emirate’ s EK* designator code on Jet Blue

- operated flights to and from an

additional city pai r

, as required under the Notice of Action Taken approving the blanket

statement of authorization granted on April 17, 2012 in the above

- referenced docket . The new

city pair is listed below :

CLE

- BOS

The carriers plan to implement this new service on or about April 30, 2015

. Please feel

free to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

J. Parker Erkmann

Counsel for JetBlue Airways Corporation

cc: Charles Donley, Counsel for Emirates

Service ListMarch 24, 2015

Page Two

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing 30

- Day Notice Regarding Additional

Codesharing Point was served this 24 th day of March , 2015 via email transmission on the

following:

david.herfernan@cozen.com

Jeremy.Ross@alaskaair.com

abigail.donovan@aa.com

howard.kass@aa.com

robert.wirick@aa.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

c hris.walker@delta.com

dan.weiss@united.com

Thomas.bolling@united.com

steve.morrissey@united.com

gmurphy@crowell.com

nssparks@fedex.com

anbird@fedex.com

matwood@cozen.com

slachter@cozen.com

jcanny@amerijet.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com

kevin.montgo mery@polaraircargo.com

anita.mosner@hklaw.com

rpommer@atlasair.com

mlbenge@zsrlaw.com ben.taylor@dot.gov

brett.kruger@dot.gov

brian.hedberg@dot.gov

robert.finamore@dot.gov

john.s.duncan@faa.gov

englets@state.gov

cristinasa@state.gov

William.stallings@usdoj.gov

info@airlineinfo.com

Erin Combs

115217569
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 8, 2010

Before

RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 10

‐ 1963

AMERICAN BANK,

Plaintiff

‐ Appellant,

v

.

DOVETAIL INCORPORATED,

MICHELLE PETERSON and

EVAN PETERSON,

Defendants

‐ Appellees

. Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Indiana, Hammond

Division.

No. 4:09

‐ cv

‐ 0064

‐ TLS

‐ APR

Theresa L. Springmann, Judge

.

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion filed by the defendants on December 2, 2010 to amend

the opinion in this case issued on November 29, 2010, the sentence on page 3 of the slip opinion,

beginning ( ʺ In an example of”) is deleted and the following sentence substituted:

(Menasha ʹ s brief barely mentions, and does not discuss, the public

‐ records law and

contains no citation to it, as if to insinuate that there is no legal basis for American Bank ʹ s

insisting on compliance with the request and as if therefore the stay granted by the

district court did not preempt state law.)
ITO.t~ Manhall Ball 

Qdo eta to ttaivera1 ty 

Col.J.d.ma 10, Chio 

Jloalo lhnhall l 

REF ID:A65777 

~ rou very nach tw ,.our l.ett.tt Cit 16 April. 

1 u ~ to learn that )'OU vUl not be able to ccae 

to tbe Panel aeetinge on !041 Mia1'· &:A1over, •illC9 

'\lie tint aetins 1e 4c91&ned U»eCiall3 tor 'bae1'1t 

flt .-v-comers in CIUl:' tiel.d~ I 4o mt thil'ilt )"OU v1ll 

ldaa too lll,ICh. I ebaU eem. )'OU A ~ ot t'.M Jllet .. 

1'1s· 

Wit.Ii reference to JCUl" hopa to coma tor a~ ar 

tvtl 1D. ~, I tba.M. JOU ye-q ~h tot.' thinking ~ 

um ati4 ~st the.t we postpone a 4eea1on oo that 

WliiU NiY about a 8Xlth tn:=. DOW', when I abe.11 vrite 

10\l .. in. 

I IW)te vi th pl.ea.GuN that you are plAlmlina to 

IPend throe welts 1n Jul1' with SCI.MP. With cwd1al 

.,.iinp, I e 

WlLUAM ., • lllttr:MAI 

llllteutive Secretan" 

EA ScientU'ie Mviaor/ Joa.rd 

ec: AG 

c/s 

Mt-. Friednnn (8/.ASST) 

M/R: AcknoW'ledgipg Dr. Hall t 8 letter ar 16 Apr 

noting his inebillty to attend Panel Meetings ~ 

20-21 ~-

Lt I.T. McDona.ld./6o493/2&.,r54/can 

_@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Ms. Deborah Jordan, Director

Region 9 Air DivisionEnvironmental Protection Agency75 Hawthorne Street

San Francisco, CA 94105

Re: Pio Pico Energy Center Environmental Protection Agency Prevention of Significant Deterioration permit application

Dear Ms. Jordan,

I am writing you to seek your assistance regarding the Environmental Protection Agency’s review of the application for an Environmental Protection Agency Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit by the Pio Pico Energy Center proposed for South San Diego County. Specifically, I would like to call your attention to unique timing circumstances surrounding the permitting and operations deadlines that apply to the new peaker plant, and to request your aid to ensure that review process ofthe project’s application is completed in a timely manner.

The Pio Pico Energy Center (PPEC) is an important component of a regional energy strategy to reduce emissions, promote renewable sources and to improve reliability for San Diego County. PPEC will use the most efficient technology available on the market to ease the electrical supply deficit that has, and will, result from the shut-down of aging plants and will do so by providing the shaping power source needed to support existing and planned renewable energy projects.

PPEC will create 250-300 local craft labor jobs during construction with approximately $60 million in payroll, 12 full time jobs with an annual payroll of $1.8 million during operation, and will generate badly needed sales and property tax revenues for local government.

The PPEC PSD application is unique from most in that the developer, Apex Power Group, has reached a 20 year power purchase agreement (PPA) with SDG&E which requires that the plant be online by May 2014 (Commercial Operation Date or COD). In order for PPEC to meet this contractual obligation, it must receive all governmental approvals, including the Region 9 Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permit, with resolution of all potential appeals and challenges, by the fourth quarter of 2012.

County Administration Center • 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335 • San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 531-5511 • Fax (619) 235-0644 www.gregcox.com Email greg.cox@sdcounty,cagov
j

p

p

j

Given the benefits to San Diego County and to my constituents as described above, I would

greatly appreciate you monitoring the process to ensure its timely completion. Any updates the

EPA could provide my office would be very helpful.

Your attention to this matter is very much appreciated. If you should have any follow upquestions, or if I can be of any assistance, please feel free to contact my office at (619) 531-5511.

Supervisor, First District
., AJ 

• REF ID: A6698. 

~· 311.3 

:f5"f~t?S3 

~ ~ tor ye ,, YfJJP'I ~ ~' w ~ 14 ... t4 

lB ~. ! ~ .~ d.U ~ 'ttd.llk ~ ~ i~~ ill 

~ ~ )'9rP ~w· b ,..... I:i f'Cet8* ~ 

~+~ lt~ n.n ta 110 ~ $b0.A'\ /'')iQt ~. tN 

turM Ui~t l lft&\U loc-k r~ to \lwU ~ ~·l~da ·v. 

~~·.'#~~ 

;,,11~.n ~ • i:: :n:, .a ;AN 

.9f')llai.al.!~ 

O/ll 

S/Atm 

ro;c 

ClVl"''11S 

"' ~t/a• Thia ~ Xv. Dw~~·• lt&- ot 12 JUQ9 ·~ a. dU1 ftlOllw 

calr lW {.r 29'!J6) ~ ?'~ & F/;!ta (.-. 25ll). l'tr• ~ is 

• ~-~Panel.., ...... 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a