alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2093 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2093

    To provide that the Secretary of Transportation shall have sole 
authority to appoint Federal Directors to the Board of Directors of the 
            Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2015

   Ms. Mikulski (for herself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Kaine, and Mr. Warner) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
        Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide that the Secretary of Transportation shall have sole 
authority to appoint Federal Directors to the Board of Directors of the 
            Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. APPOINTMENT OF DIRECTORS OF THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA 
              TRANSIT AUTHORITY.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section--
            (1) the term ``Compact'' means the Washington Metropolitan 
        Area Transit Authority Compact (Public Law 89-774; 80 Stat. 
        1324);
            (2) the term ``Federal Director'' means--
                    (A) a voting member of the Board of Directors of 
                the Transit Authority who represents the Federal 
                Government; and
                    (B) a nonvoting member of the Board of Directors of 
                the Transit Authority who serves as an alternate for a 
                member described in subparagraph (A); and
            (3) the term ``Transit Authority'' means the Washington 
        Metropolitan Area Transit Authority established under Article 
        III of the Compact.
    (b) Appointment by Secretary of Transportation.--
            (1) In general.--For any appointment made on or after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation 
        shall have sole authority to appoint Federal Directors to the 
        Board of Directors of the Transit Authority.
            (2) Amendment to compact.--The signatory parties to the 
        Compact shall amend the Compact as necessary in accordance with 
        paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 99.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
of Biomet, Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies that to his knowledge
on the date hereof:

(a)   The Form 10-Q of the Company for the Quarter Ended February 28, 2003
      filed on the date	hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   Information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                                   /s/  Dane A. Miller
                                                   -------------------
                                                   Dane A. Miller, Ph.D.
                                                   April 14, 2003

                                                   /s/  Gregory D. Hartman
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   Gregory D. Hartman
                                                   April 14, 2003
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2073 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

7715 Post Road in North Kingstown, Rhode Island, as the ‘‘Melvoid 

J. Benson Post Office Building’’. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 

Mr. WHITEHOUSE (for himself and Mr. REED) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 7715 Post Road in North Kingstown, Rhode 

Island, as the ‘‘Melvoid J. Benson Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MELVOID J. BENSON POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 7715 Post Road in North 

6 Kingstown, Rhode Island, shall be known and designated 

7 as the ‘‘Melvoid J. Benson Post Office Building’’. 

8 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg9 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2073 IS

1 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

2 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Melvoid J. Benson 

3 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
RULE 13A-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of MRV Communications, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned, in the capacities and on March 3,2004, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



| | 1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

| |  |                                      
| |  | -------------------------------------
| |  | MRV COMMUNICATIONS, INC              
| |  |                                      
| |  | By: /s/ Noam Lotan                   
| |  | Noam Lotan                           
| |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                                      
| |  | By: /s/ Shay Gonen                   
| |  | Shay Gonen                           
| |  | Chief Financial Officer              

94
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6242

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SEAN F. MESCALL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, 

at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cr-00215-RJC-1; 3:17-cv00202-RJC)

Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sean F. Mescall, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sean F. Mescall seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the 

merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 

336-38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner 

must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the 

motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 

484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Mescall has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We deny the motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-95605 and
333-30384) pertaining to the 1991 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan, the 1997 Non-Employee Directors' Stock Option Plan, the Amplicon Corp. Stock Option
Plan, the Tularik Matching Plan, and the 1999 Employee Stock Purchase Plan of Tularik Inc. of our report dated February 8, 2001, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Tularik Inc. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2000.



Palo Alto, California
March 22,2001

---
OF 

REF ID:A72868 

A?J.Il·;G m~i !~.?.LL ST1,,.rrc:~ 

~::!:3.3}..C-3: CE:: rL:'.l 

-Date filed 

l1i.m.e f !led 

• {fl) 

-~:,..,!Ji,.....i"-"'!l~>-.-19'3 

0100 ... 

~'C':i' 

····- c c:.~s ·~ ~ l·. ~'D 1.RI: USED 

".i. 0 r--~· '"''l'"'-,,,. •· -:7~ '"'"I"'~- ... """0 ., ,. ... Tr.-. ~·tro!t-r· ..,_n" ~ - ..,....,_ 1 ..... --• ... • .. ...,-.. .,'" v •• ..) ! •. .LJJ.-.. .i!.1.1 _. •• !. •·'I .... ·. t 

~ ..... .. '-1!.J • r· &.... ,, . r::·· .. 1.?.'£ lJ'S~Ft'L !~! :U!CI:~'l-'fTP JP..!' 1C-::' -o!'' P."..E.':'ICtU.E. GA F mrrrs - __ .... - PD so:::: er ':'EIS S~'ll: ,( IS !t:?:Co:~D~ /.~~ USrD l"::-: ·:r .. :1;Ir.l 

' 

--

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-28-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

De lie c~=i"i~ed 

I'i~e co;·.pleted • ,, , .... lo:' __ ,_ - ~ _ ... .a.llJ 

l . _.,. ... ~ 

_.,ww,/.j 

l':~E : _-.:.I::G c: ;1; E::..;.c r c C?Y o:: IiiIS : :::.35J...G~ !3 i'ORBIDIEl·:-

.. . ·' .. -

I 

f . 

I i ~ I 

~· ... ~ . 

,... .. .. r • : . 

~:· 

r : 

I 

I 

r " 

t ~. 

r •• 

-":.· ...... 

: .· 

. '· 

: ·.: .. ':' ·.· . : 

'=- •• : • 

. .. ·: . ... · .·: 

·.·: 

... : .. ... ~ 

.... 

:. .. :. 

:.··: 

.· 

1 

r
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,984
<SECURITIES>                                    18,205
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,302
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,525
<PP&E>                                           3,519
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,933
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,342
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,542
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,789
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,342
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,378
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,443)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        59
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (12,502)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,502)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.72)
        

</TABLE>
ex10-2.htm



EXHIBIT 10.2








Form of JULY 2011 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION AGREEMENT - Ms. Gouw







THIS COMPENSATION AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and effective as of July 26, 2011, by East West Bank, a California banking corporation (the “Company”) with respect to Julia Gouw (the “Employee”) and with reference to the following facts:








	
A.  

	
The Company desires to be assured of the continued association and services of the Employee in order to take advantage of her experience, knowledge and abilities in the Company’s business.








	
B.  

	
The Company also desires to recognize her crucial current and past role in successfully leading the Company to its current situation.












ACCORDINGLY, the Company hereby agrees as follows:


 



	
1.  

	
Long Term Performance / Retention Awards.    Executive shall receive a cash payment on each of October 31, 2015 and on March 31, 2016 of $1,250,000 subject to (i) the Company meeting certain performance criteria over these time periods; and (ii) Employee is employed by the Company.







 


 



	
2.  

	
Tax Withholding.  Payments are subject to applicable tax withholding requirements.







 


 



	
3.  

	
Termination for Cause.    The payments described herein shall become immediately due and payable, if Employee is terminated by the Company for any reason other than “for cause” or by the Employee with “just reason,” as such terms are defined in that Employment Agreement dated as of June 25, 1998 between the Company and Employee.







 


 



	
4.  

	
Severable Provisions.  The provisions of the Agreement are severable, and if any one or more provisions may be determined to be illegal or otherwise unenforceable, in whole or in part, the remaining provisions, and any partially unenforceable provisions to the extent enforceable, shall nevertheless be binding and enforceable.







 


 



	
5.  

	
Successors and Assigns.  All of the terms, provisions and obligations of the Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, representatives, successors and assigns.







 


 



	
6.  

	
Governing Law.  The validity, construction and interpretation of the Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts made and to be performed within that State and is subject to applicable banking and other laws and regulations applicable to the Company and this agreement.







 


 



	
7.  

	
Additional Agreement.  The Agreement supplements any and all existing employment agreements and arrangements with Employee.







 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first set forth above at the direction of its Board of Directors.







EAST WEST BANK







By: ________________________


Name:  _____________________


Its:  ________________________
- - - .. I > -p_ .i!_ .... ~ -- • : 

Mr. Bo:ri• d. 'W'. Hage lin 

Crypto A.G. 

Weinbergetrasse 10 

zug, awitzerl.and 

Dear Boris: 

L_ 

-BEiiit-rn : A64 4 o a 

3i61Jecond Street, s.K. 

l(ashillgf;on 3, :D. C!. 

28 October 1954 

A day or two ago Elizabeth and I were dinner guests of Ingrid and Art, and 

we enjoyed our Visit vith them very much indeed.. Also with that very attractive 

grandchild of yours, Anniel 

Ingrid told me they'd had. a letter from you recently, sent while enroute back 

to Zug. I hope you arrived home safely after a very f'ine summer in Sweden. 

I take this occasion to thank you and Annie a.gain f'or your absentee hospitaJ..ity to me while a guest in your hoioo le.et August. It would have been nicer, 

of course, bad you been home at the time, but as it was I enjoyed staying in that 

very pleasant house of yours. 

~ ~ine.tbat Bo ~s a+sap:poin~d with me in that I have not answered his 

last letter. As a !18tter of fact, I have been very much engrossed with many 

pressing things at the office and besides that, l mu.st say there wasn't anything 

I could add to what I'd told Bo in my previous letter. 

At home we are very busy with writing or rather putting the finishing 

touches to our book on Bbakespeare-Ba.conJ in addition, I am engrossed in preparing a revision of my article CODES AND CIPHERS tor the Encyclopaedia 

Britannica, originally written in 1927· In this connection b the wa. I 

asked Bo to sen~ me a cou le of' hoto a b.s one of the ..__ _ ___. so that I could use them for llustrations. He was mos k n , or 

not only got the :photos by return nail but also the negatives; and a f~w days 

later there came two cuts from Stockholm. So in addition to tbankj.ngBo, I 

must thank you, too, not only for this material but alao for l,etting me use 

it for :my revised article. EO 3.3(h)(2) - - -- 5 

,___ ______________ ----!! However, I hope you will be patient 

"With me f'or a little while longer. ""When and if matters c~ to a dead end or 

upon a. dead center, I will tell you SOJ in the m:!antima, I hope you will 

continue to think well of 

Yours sincerely, 

'P,.f:L Mv mn•+. -~~""'+.iAM•t• <Y'l"••i:·h!~-• +n •11 ____ WTT,T.T•M 11'- _ll'Qil'f'IMA.'N" __ _ 

BECRElJ 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 01-15-2015 ursuantto E .0. 1352
.-: •.d. • 

ADDRESS ONLY 

TlfE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C.,; 

• 

REF ID:A362685 

DEPARTMENT 

UNITED STATES 

OF 

PATENT 

COMMERCE 

OFFICE 

• 

WASHINGTON 

Please find below a communicationfrom the EXAMINER 

in charge of this application. ~ ,,~. a •U-... •• ec .. ~ -'! •q..c.' ~ .... --- . y- -··· ·~ 

.---------------- Commissioner of Patcnt3. 

PAPER No. 11 

All communicmions respecting dais applicaJion ahould give the lerial number, dat.e of jiling, 

and rnunc of the appli<:an:. 

U. S. PATENT OFftcf 

JUN 10 1948 Harry M. ~.aragovitz 

agal Div. 

c/ o lih1ef Signal Of fie er 

Pentagon Bl;.; 6• ~~s.sh1ng1xin, D.c. 

Division: 

Applicant: 

16 IVTAtLEn 

vV1111am F. ::Zrl."'edman 

Ser. No. 476,193 GPO 10-27315-6 Filed Mar. 6 1 1943 

Cartier 

Vernnm 

.ilanger 

For SY~'l'E:.: ! ml ELWIPHERING 

FACSIMILE 

Re1pona1ve to wnendnent filed Oct. 20_. 1947. 

Addi tionnl reference a relied on: 

July 

July 

Mar • 

Claim 10 has been canceled. 

26, 1932 

2.2, 1919 

8, 1932 

17B/22 

170/22 

178/6.6 

~ormerly allowed claim l is rejected ue beinG directly 

readable on Cartier or Vernam. The claim 1s .ceadc.ble on Cartier 

Figures 2 and 3 as t"ollows: The first circuit is the one connected to contacts K and the second circuit 1s connected to contacts 

Ki. D1 etribu tor Di is the transmitter v;h1le d1s tr1bu tor n2 1a 

the receiver. The interlock :is the relays J between K, Ki• 

The· third circuit ie that controlled by con toe ts N2. The second 

re cited interlock is relaYB J2. The claims are El.£~pl1cnble to 

Vernam in a similar manner. 

Claims 2, 3, 8, 9, 11 and 12 are rejected ue being unpo.tentable over Cartier or Verno.m on the .. su· .. ne ..:J'l'ounds o.s stated 

above in reference to claim l. 

Claim 4 1a rejected on Cartier or Vernam in view of 

Hant;er. ·It is not considered invention to substitute a photoelectric type of form scannin__; device such us tha. t of famt,;er 

for the tape scanning devices of Cartier or Vernam. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-22-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

......... ...
-, . ' 

: ,. ·J 

-· • REF ID:A362685e 

-2-

It ie not-r;.td that clthou.gh t;huoo cl£d.t:ia recite nface!milo 

nt vc.r1oua points no p&rtieulo.r facs1r.11le c;u t1r.r(,;uish1n._; atruc• 

t\r e J.a ~ot .fort:i ir~ tl~ clo.iw.s ... 

Cla.:lm.n 5, 6 and '{ still appear nllowublo. 

It 1e rourotted U1r.t the above patents were :wt prev1ously d18covoreu. 

::bis appl1catior. ahc·' .. ld be ~.repo.1 .. ed for final :.c tion. 

1~o 1urther Q'..i.entlnents t..bn t do not .r:lo.co tho cuee 1n con,i!.tion 

for allcwonee or better .forn .for appeo.l. td.ll be cnterc~: d'ter 

i'inal oction 1.:nloz~ u.cco!!i.punie~! by a propor show1n_- -oi :_poc one 

eur f1e1ent roaaons wh.y tb8"J were not earlier i.:iresente:.i. 1~.,~1e 

6U and com.:"!lizsioner'a I:C1t1.ce or April 26, l~u. 610 o. ;., ?.)8. 

S7iC/1pn Lm::rtner
ex10-13.htm


EXHIBIT 10.13







PROMISSORY NOTE












 



	
$1,700.00

	
April 12, 2011


	  	
Austin, Texas







 


FOR VALUE, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Restaurant Concepts of America, a Nevada company referred to as (“Borrower”), promises to pay to David Cho (“Lender”), or order, at Austin, Texas, or as otherwise instructed, the principal sum of one thousand seven dollars ($1,700.00) in lawful tender of the United States, together with simple interest thereon at an annual interest rate of eight percent (8%).







Terms of Repayment. This Promissory Note shall become due and payable together will all accrued interest on April 12, 2012.







Default.  Any one or more of the following events shall constitute a Default under the terms of this Note:








	
1)  

	
Borrower fail to make timely payment when due.


	
2)  

	
Borrower breaches an agreement or promise made to Lender, or fails to timely perform any obligation owing to Lender








	
3)  

	
Borrower makes any representation or statement to Lender that is false or misleading in any material manner.


	
4)  

	
Borrower becomes insolvent, or a receiver is appointed for any part of all of Borrower’s property, of Borrower makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or any proceeding is brought either by Borrower of against Borrower under any Bankruptcy or insolvency laws.












In the event of any default as described herein, Lender, without further protest, presentment or notice, may declare all sums due and payable, together with any interest then due.







Waiver.  Forbearance of any payment due of modification of any term of this Note by Lender in any manner shall not be deemed nor construed as a waiver of any other rights in favor of Lender under the terms of this Notice.







Legal.  This Note shall be construed in accordance with the laws of that State of Texas, which shall be the choice of jurisdiction and venue for purposes of enforcement of this Note.  If any action is brought to enforce any provision or collect on this Note, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reimbursement for all reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, in addition to any other relief to which that party may be entitled.


 



	  	
Restaurant Concepts of America


	  	  
	  	
By:   /s/ David Cho


	  	
David Cho - President / CEO