alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties Fund XVI(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), StevenD. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership,and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of thePartnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to thebest of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification is furnished with thisReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall notbe deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.
= 

--

_>&\ r 

.. _, 

l 

-- ' -

_, 

= 

-- J. -

A 

REF 

- ~-

= .I ' 

--

---·]!,- ID_~A7044B 

= =- = ...... --=--=- .... ------ - - _::::. - - -- - -==-- __ ..::::----

.:::- -- - -==- - - -- - ~ ----....::. _-::;_ - ---=--- =-- _,., ;; 4~ - r~ - -::.= fi -- -------= .- ~ -'- - - - - ~ -y:--_- -

~ - \ - --: - ;; ~-~-::_-:.-~;; :;_ 

-- ~-

"' -

~- --~- "!.--

--- .:: - -~ - - - - - -- }T - ;;: -~"!. - --y --- - -- :d"- ~- :t ;;:'! - :;_ - - - - - - -:.-= ~ -

~~=l~~~~if ;i~~~~~-~- =~~~-~i~~~~-~~~:~~~~i~--~~~--~~t_/[;~ --- - .::.'=.. ~--.. ~~ ---- ~ - ~ - ---- y =-==--=-=--=-~~:;_~ =_-....::- - - --=- - - -- - ----:_::...=--=---:.. - =-=----- =-~ -~ ~ ~ 

' ., 

"<r =-..:-__ - -

--------

:~ _= ---~ --3 - - =--:... ., - -- ' ~:::.-= .::--- : .... 

=------

_-:.,- - =- --

= 

= 

---- =- - -...- ----"'=- -- -= .... - - =-.... ,... -=-:_.=:._-:... --=--""i-~::._ _:=- -- -....- - - - = --

=-' -= ...:::~ -.... ;- -

= -- = =- = = - =-=== - - =._.:- = ... - -
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of US Energy Systems Inc (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 14, 2003

U. S. ENERGY SYSTEMS, INC.


By: /s/ Goran Mornhed
    --------------------------------------------
    Goran Morhhed
    Chief Executive Officer
    (Principal Executive Officer)


By: /s/ Thomas Noonan
    --------------------------------------------
    Thomas Noonan
    Chief Accounting Officer
    (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference of our reports dated February 12, 2002 included in the Form 10-K of
MRV Communications, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2001 into the
following Registration Statements of MRV Communications, Inc.:



<TABLE>
       <S>                                           <C>
       (i)     Form S-8 File No.  33-96458           (ii)    Form S-8 File No. 333-87743
       (iii)   Form S-8 File No. 333-87741           (iv)    Form S-8 File No. 333-87739
       (v)     Form S-8 File No. 333-87735           (vi)    Form S-8 File No. 333-87733
       (vii)   Form S-8 File No. 333-87731           (viii)  Form S-3 File No. 333-86163
       (ix)    Form S-3 File No. 333-17537           (x)     Form S-3 File No. 333-64017
       (xi)    Form S-3 File No. 333-39560           (xii)   Form S-8 File No. 333-42306
       (xiii)  Form S-3 File No. 333-44534           (xiv)   Form S-4 File No. 333-44536
       (xv)    Form S-8 File No. 333-44540           (xvi)   Form S-8 File No. 333-47896
       (xvii)  Form S-8 File No. 333-47898           (xviii) Form S-8 File No. 333-47900
       (xix)   Form S-8 File No. 333-55328           (xx)    Form S-8 File No. 333-55334
       (xxi)   Form S-8 File No. 333-71180           (xxii)  Form S-3 File No. 333-71178
       (xxiii) Form S-8 File No. 333-81954           (xxiv)  Form S-8 File No. 333-81958
       (xxv)   Form S-8 File No. 333-81950           (xxvi)  Form S-8 File No. 333-81956
</TABLE>




/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP


Los Angeles, California
March 19, 2002
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05269]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9053]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``T[ecirc]te-a-T[ecirc]te: Three Masterpieces From the 
Mus[eacute]e d'Orsay''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``T[ecirc]te-a-T[ecirc]te: Three 
Masterpieces from the Mus[eacute]e d'Orsay,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Norton Simon Museum of Art, 
Pasadena, California, from on or about March 26, 2015, until on or 
about June 22, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that 
Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the imported objects, contact the Office of the Legal Adviser, 
U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 25, 2015.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-05269 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997             JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,063                   8,063
<SECURITIES>                                    33,159                  33,159
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,837                   5,837
<ALLOWANCES>                                       309                     309
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                48,739                  48,739
<PP&E>                                           4,318                   4,318
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,613                   1,613
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,751                  51,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,489                   7,489
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                            77                      77
<OTHER-SE>                                      43,209                  43,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,751                  51,751
<SALES>                                          4,883                  10,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,936                  13,965
<CGS>                                              852                   1,554
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,570                   2,862
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,005                  11,645
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   3                       5
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (96)                     533
<INCOME-TAX>                                         8                      56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (104)                     477
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (104)                     477
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)                    0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                    0.06
        

</TABLE>
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 16, 2015.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-14-00780-CR

NORMA JEAN SANCHEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 351st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1399973

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to aggravated assault with a deadly 

weapon without an agreed recommendation on punishment. Appellant entered a 

plea of “true” to an enhancement paragraph and on September 18, 2014, the trial 

court sentenced appellant to confinement for thirty years in the Institutional 

Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a timely 

notice of appeal.
2

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal 

is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record and demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to 

be advanced. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978).

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised 

of the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford 

v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 512 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). At appellant’s request, the 

record was provided to her. As of this date, no response has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in 

the record. A discussion of the brief would add nothing to the jurisprudence of the 

state. We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a 

pro se response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for 

review. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jamison and Busby. 

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
#### Harold Raymond HOOKS et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, Michael E. Provence, Howard Douglas and Ray Broadhead, Intervenors-Appellees, v. Louie L. WAINWRIGHT, Secretary, etc., Respondent-Appellant.

No. 77-3308.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 24, 1978.

*1103Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Bernard S. McLendon, Asst. Atty. Gen., William C. Sherrill, Jr., Chief Trial Counsel, Tallahassee, Fla., for respondent-appellant.

Charles H. Livingston, Sarasota, Fla., for Hooks, et al.

John T. Chandler, Henry George White, Fla. Legal Services, Inc., Prison Project, Gainesville, Fla., for Provence, et al.

Before RONEY, RUBIN and VANCE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In 1971, the named plaintiff, relying on 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed an individual suit and a class action contending that the inmates of Florida’s state correctional institutions were unable properly to seek post conviction relief without legal books and services, and attacking the asserted insufficiency of the legal services provided them. On December 6, 1972, the lower court first directed the defendant to file a plan for the “speedy implementation” of legal services sufficient to meet the constitutional mandate of effective inmate access to the courts. Nearly four and a half years later, and before any permanent relief had been ordered, the Supreme Court, in another case, set forth the principles governing inmate access to the courts. *Bounds v. Smith,*1977, 430 U.S. 817, 97 S.Ct. 1491, 52 L.Ed.2d 72. Meanwhile, with federal financial assistance, a program called the Florida Legal Services, Inc. Prison Project began to provide legal services to inmates at three of the larger Florida state prisons. After *Bounds*was decided, the Florida authorities were required to take over the financial support of the Prison Project; to prevent its termination, the trial court issued a preliminary injunction forbidding the defendant Secretary of the Florida Department of Offender Rehabilitation to discontinue that project until the defendant presents, and the court approves, a legal services plan sufficient to meet the requirements of *Bounds.*

The evidence presented to the trial court amply supports its finding that, at the time the injunction was issued, the defendant was not providing the minimum level of legal assistance that is constitutionally required. Indeed, the Prison Project itself serves only about 25 per cent of the state’s inmate population.

At such time as the evidence demonstrates that an adequate plan has been implemented at any institution, the trial court should consider approving the plan at that institution, instead of allowing the injunction to remain in force unmodified until all inmates at all institutions are receiving what the Constitution mandates. However, the determination of the services that are needed to meet the *Bounds*standards for the inmates of Florida’s institutions, and the approval of a plan that satisfies these criteria with respect to the situation in the State of Florida are matters that must be determined, at least in the first instance, by the trial court.

AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

    <ARTICLE>                         5
           
    <S>                               <C>
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1997
    <PERIOD-START>                          APR-01-1997
    <PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1997
    <CASH>                                            0
    <SECURITIES>                                      0
    <RECEIVABLES>                                     0
    <ALLOWANCES>                                      0
    <INVENTORY>                                       0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
    <PP&E>                                            0
    <DEPRECIATION>                                    0
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    0
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
    <BONDS>                                           0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
    <PREFERRED>                                       0
    <COMMON>                                          0
    <OTHER-SE>                                   672769
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      0
    <SALES>                                           0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
    <CGS>                                             0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
    <INCOME-TAX>                                      0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
    <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
    <CHANGES>                                         0
    <NET-INCOME>                                      0
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

    
</TABLE>
involves regular software updates and constant inspection 

### for assessment

### of any damaged hardware.

Summary 

### IR DISTRO 

### INC seeks an exemption 

### from the

### following Regulations: 14 C.F.R. 21, subpart 

### H; 14 C.P.R. 

### a5.23(b);14 C.F.R. $$ 61.113 (a)

### & (b); 14C.F.R. $ 91.7 

### (a); 14 C.F.R. $

### el.e (bX2); 14 C.F.R. $

### e1.103(b); 14C.F.R. $

### 91.109; 14C.F.R. $ 

### 9r.tI9;14 C.F.R. $

### 91.121; 14 C.F.R. $91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. $$ 91.203(a) and 

### (b);
14 C.F.R. $91.40s 

### (a); 

### t4 C.F.R. $

### el.407 (a) 

### (1); 

### l4 C.P.R.$ 91.40e 

### (a)(D;

## A
C.P.R. $91.409 

### (a)(2); and,14 C.P.R.$$ 91.417 (a)

### & (b)

### to operate its 

### UAS for research, development and demonstration 

### to government/non-government, 

### Community education. 

### IR DISTRO 

### INC

### will offer education 

### to change the present and change the future. 

### America's economic 

### future is 

### bright 

### if IR DISTRO 

### INC is granted the 

### opportunity to educate our communities 

### to be respectful and responsible operators as 

### hobbyist and 

### future professionals 

### of UAS. Granting 

### IR DISTRO 

### INC request 

### for exemption 

### will reduce current 

### risk levels and thereby enhance safety. Further 

### IR DISTRO 

### INC operates at 

### lower altitudes and in the 

### line 

### of sight. 

### IR DISTRO 

### INC owners

### will be agood resource 

### for Government and communities to be educated 

### if exemption is granted. 

### UAS's andtherefore the 

### likelihood of death 

### or serious 

### bodily injury are

### significantly limited. IR DISTRO 

### INC respectfully requests thatthe 

### FAA grants its exemption request 

### without delay. The 

### FAAhas the 

### authority to issuethe exemption sought 

### by IR DISTRO 

### INC.

Sincerely 

# {n D,slu 1t4 Joel 

### Bredow CEO -t 

## -/ ./ 

# //4/ 

# {-25-zct5
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 39 (Friday, February 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 10681]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04082]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL14-33-000]


DATC Path 15, LLC; Notice of Institution of Section 206 
Proceeding and Refund Effective Date

    On April 17, 2014, the Commission issued an order in Docket No. 
EL14-33-000, pursuant to section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 
U.S.C. 824e (2012), instituting an investigation to determine the 
justness and reasonableness of DATC Path 15, LLC's proposed 
transmission revenue requirement reduction. DATC Path 15, LLC, 147 FERC 
] 61,035 (2014).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL14-33-000, established 
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication 
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: February 23, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-04082 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
- REF ID:A6909f' 

GQNFiOE~,n-IP•i;.. 

Jlr. J. DNch 

..... , ~e D1viaion 

ldiwl Cub~~ 

lla1a ... ' nr.te 

Dqtoe 9, oaio 

........ DNchl 

&crrw.: a I 3 7 ~~~ / 7-.J--<f 

the Dt.ntcn«, •i-10Da1 ~v ~, bu i.J:d'armd - tba~ ;;rou ..... ~ i..11 -1..tioD w ......-.s., - tM ~ Pwl 

fll ~ latiocal &.ecur11;J Apalq' SoieGUtio .Ab'i.aialy i.rd. (EMAi}. 

/ta ~ ot \he mu&AB, I w..&l.d. like w aprua -., sn.iiticat.iou 

tor 1fNZ ~~or~ .,.., .. tioa. 

Althot~ tho er1Jll -.tine ol ~ ~ Wb.ia:b ,,.. reta, ., to 

1a tU Mnctor'• lUt letter '° JOU lal DO\ ,...t been hel.4, then are 

oert&1.a anu ta vts.ich ..-1 Mt.ta au DOI M iaiti&tad. Spec1t10&ll)-, 

w 1atnd. '° ..- a .,..1&.l nat;r or oert.a.1• t~ ar pnaal purpoee 

nm-1• ual.7tto 99111 111\ SUie:h ~ u ~ u the w.lps.a fll VU'U... 6"1 ... ot tiftC't oi:ma•n to \be Aa•AQ, u4 1t 1Ja telt 

~ - .. -- & a-aau.e ~ w w.a etton.. 

It 1a baped. ~ Prof. J. J'a:riesWl' 1 Mr. Joam Howud, Mr. S. 1.4. 

Dt& 111, er. Clasen h..,,., u4 70W'Rl.t, all p illll'Uft .-.1 

1 tnr1, wUl •Ula to~ ... etton to thS. ~· Mr. Jolm 

c. lle:Pt•r1a, lioe ~' 111Mr9"1aal lluSrnr Mattdmar Ccl&'pora.-

u., 590 "lltt.,. A..._., In Yan•, .... ?Ol1r.1 Ul4 ca..u.a ot our 

lleetroaJ.q Pucl, ha.I &ecept.ed. u. ~ ot th1a O"OVP. 

It ,..,. Y1.U a4TUe - ot .,,.,,. p!"OllliUle ava1l.aldll tJ 1a tu 

r1111 l't:laq ...,. ~ tar th1a ettart, 1 vUl iJd"wm Mr. McPbtnon, 

1'ho eu tMll CODfer Wit.A 10\l oa tbl etepc aK• ... 17 to Wtiate such 

• .u.sy. 

cc: NJ 

c/s a. a. CAllJll 8/ Nm (Mr. Friedlan} a.snu 

Chtwl, JIWlAJ (Dr. C&irm) mA lciaUtl• ~ AMr4 

M/Rs Inrltatioa to Mr. Dnch to Joi.A a group \ID6n- the c~ ot 

Mr. llcPbencm (lleetrcmiu Penal, EMA.I, Cbairma) to -.a a special 

nwb' at cert&iJl tnea ot gneral pu:rpw nu:nue ~ic equ.ipmlt. 

attWIC/&/NJ11T/6CJ.93/2 Feb 54 

',;41~f J:.r .. ~:1~q.~ ~ ,.· ( ,.A.t~ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-25-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JEROME J. FINOCCHI, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4167

)

LINDSAY H. CALDWELL, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed October 3, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco 

County; Alicia Polk, Judge.

John G. DeGirolamo of The Law Offices of

John DeGirolamo, Tampa, for Appellant.

Jeffrey Grabel and Christy Ferioli of Bay 

Area Legal Services, Inc., Dade City; Kristin 

A. Norse of Kynes, Markman & Felman, 

P.A., for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SLEET, LUCAS, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.