12804 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 47 / Wednesday, March 11, 2015 / Notices 

5See 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

6See 19 CFR 351.309(c)–(d), 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

7See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(l)(ii) and 351.309(d)(l). 

8See 19 CFR 351.309(d)(2). 

9See 19 CFR 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

10See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

11See 19 CFR 351.310. 

12See 19 CFR 351.310(c). 

1See Countervailing Duty Order: Prestressed 

Concrete Steel Wire Strand From India, 69 FR 5319 

(February 4, 2004) (‘‘Order’’) 

2See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 79 

FR 65186 (November 3, 2014). 

Company Subsidy rate 

(percent) 

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 34.77 

Daewoo Electronics Corporation ........................................ 81.91 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

The Department intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with this 

preliminary determination within five 

days of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register.5 Interested parties 

may submit case and rebuttal briefs, as 

well as request a hearing.6 Interested 

parties may submit written comments 

(case briefs) within 30 days of 

publication of the preliminary results 

and rebuttal comments (rebuttal briefs) 

within five days after the time limit for 

filing case briefs.7 Rebuttal briefs must 

be limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs.8 Parties who submit case or 

rebuttal briefs are requested to submit 

with the argument: (1) A statement of 

the issue; (2) a brief summary of the 

argument; and (3) a table of authorities.9

Interested parties who wish to request 

a hearing, or to participate if one is 

requested, must do so within 30 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

by submitting a written request to the 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, using Enforcement and 

Compliance’s ACCESS system.10

Requests should contain the party’s 

name, address, and telephone number, 

the number of participants, and a list of 

the issues to be discussed. If a request 

for a hearing is made, we will inform 

parties of the scheduled date for the 

hearing which will be held at the U.S. 

Department of Commerce, 14th Street 

and Constitution Avenue NW., 

Washington, DC 20230, at a time and 

location to be determined.11 Parties 

should confirm by telephone the date, 

time, and location of the hearing. Issues 

addressed at the hearing will be limited 

to those raised in the briefs.12 All briefs 

and hearing requests must be filed 

electronically and received successfully 

in their entirety through ACCESS by 

5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the due date. 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act, we intend to issue the final results 

of this administrative review, including 

the results of our analysis of the issues 

raised by the parties in their comments, 

within 120 days after issuance of these 

preliminary results. 

Assessment Rates and Cash Deposit 

Requirement 

In accordance with 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4)(i), we assigned a subsidy 

rate for each producer/exporter subject 

to this administrative review. Upon 

issuance of the final results, the 

Department shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, CVDs on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. We 

intend to issue instructions to CBP 15 

days after publication of the final results 

of review. 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, the Department also intends to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated CVDs, in the amounts shown 

above for each of the respective 

companies shown above, on shipments 

of subject merchandise entered, or 

withdrawn from warehouse, for 

consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review. For all non-reviewed firms, we 

will instruct CBP to continue to collect 

cash deposits at the most-recent 

company-specific or all-others rate 

applicable to the company, as 

appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

These preliminary results are issued 

and published in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: March 2, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Adverse Inferences 

V. Analysis of Programs 

VI. Conclusion 

[FR Doc. 2015–05562 Filed 3–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–533–829] 

Final Results of Expedited Sunset 

Review of Countervailing Duty Order: 

Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire 

Strand From India 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset 

review, the Department of Commerce 

(the ‘‘Department’’) finds that revocation 

of the countervailing duty (‘‘CVD’’) 

order on prestressed concrete steel wire 

strand (‘‘PC Strand’’) from India would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

at the level indicated in the ‘‘Final 

Results of Review’’ section of this 

notice. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mandy Mallott, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6430. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On November 3, 2014, the Department 

initiated the second sunset review of the 

Order 1 pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

‘‘Act’’).2 On November 17, 2014, the 

Department received a timely 

notification of intent to participate from 

Insteel Wire Products Company and 

Sumiden Wire Products Corporation 

(collectively, ‘‘domestic parties’’ or 

‘‘Petitioners’’), filed in accordance with 

19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i). On December 3, 

2014, the Department received a 

substantive response from Petitioners, 

timely filed in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.218(d)(3)(i). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) and section 

751(c)(3)(B) of the Act, when there are 

inadequate responses from respondent 

interested parties, the Department will 

conduct an expedited sunset review 

and, not later than 120 days after the 

date of publication in the Federal 

Register of the notice of initiation, issue 

final results of review based on the facts 

available. The Department did not 

receive a substantive response from the 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 47 / Wednesday, March 11, 2015 / Notices 12805 

3See Memorandum from Christian Marsh, Deputy 

Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, entitled ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited 

First Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty 

Order on Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 

from the India,’’ dated concurrently with this 

notice. 

4On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and 

Compliance changed the name of Enforcement and 

Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized Electronic 

Service System (‘‘IA ACCESS’’) to AD and CVD 

Centralized Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’). 

The web location was changed from http://

iaaccess.trade.gov to http://access.trade.gov. The 

Final Rule changing the references to the 

Regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 

(November 20, 2014). 

1See Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Preliminary 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2013–2014, 79 FR 75789 (December 19, 

2014) (Preliminary Results). 

Government of India or any Indian 

producers or exporters. Accordingly, we 

conducted an expedited (120-day) 

sunset review of the Order. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to this order 

is prestressed concrete steel wire (‘‘PC 

strand’’), which is steel strand produced 

from wire of non-stainless, nongalvanized steel, which is suitable for 

use in prestressed concrete (both pretensioned and post-tensioned) 

applications. The product definition 

encompasses covered and uncovered 

strand and all types, grades, and 

diameters of PC strand. 

The merchandise under this order is 

currently classifiable under subheadings 

7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012 of the 

Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 

United States (‘‘HTSUS’’). Although the 

HTSUS subheadings are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the merchandise 

under investigation is dispositive. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in this review are 

addressed in the accompanying Issues 

and Decision Memorandum (‘‘IDM’’), 

which is hereby adopted by this notice.3

The issues discussed in the IDM include 

the likelihood of continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

and the net countervailable subsidy 

likely to prevail if the Order were 

revoked. Parties can find a complete 

discussion of all issues raised in this 

expedited sunset review and the 

corresponding recommendations in this 

public memorandum which is on file 

electronically via the Enforcement and 

Compliance Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (‘‘ACCESS’’).4

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at http://access.trade.gov and in the 

Central Records Unit, Room 7046 of the 

main Department of Commerce 

building. In addition, a complete 

version of the IDM can be accessed 

directly on the Internet at http://

enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html. 

The signed IDM and the electronic 

versions of the IDM are identical in 

content. 

Final Results of Review 

Pursuant to sections 752(b)(1) and (3) 

of the Act, the Department determines 

that revocation of the Order would be 

likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of a countervailable subsidy 

for all producers/manufacturers/

exporters at a net countervailable 

subsidy rate of 62.92 percent. 

Notification Regarding Administrative 

Protective Order 

This notice serves as the only 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (‘‘APO’’) 

of their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. 

Timely notification of return/

destruction of APO materials or 

conversion to judicial protective order is 

hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and the terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

We are issuing and publishing the 

results and notice in accordance with 

sections 751(c), 752, and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act. 

Dated: March 2, 2015. 

Paul Piquado, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05560 Filed 3–10–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–351–825] 

Stainless Steel Bar From Brazil: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2013–2014 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: On December 19, 2014, the 

Department of Commerce (the 

Department) published the preliminary 

results of the administrative review of 

the antidumping duty order on stainless 

steel bar (SSB) from Brazil.1 The period 

of review (POR) is February 1, 2013, 

through January 31, 2014. The review 

covers one producer/exporter of the 

subject merchandise, Villares Metals 

S.A. (Villares). We invited parties to 

comment on the Preliminarily Results. 

None were received. Accordingly, for 

the final results, we continue to find 

that Villares did not make sales of 

subject merchandise at less than normal 

value. 

DATES: Effective Date: March 11, 2015. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Catherine Cartsos or Minoo Hatten, AD/ 

CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–1757, and (202) 

482–1690, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On December 19, 2014, the 

Department published the Preliminary 

Results of the administrative review. 

The Department gave interested parties 

an opportunity to comment on the 

Preliminary Results. None were 

received. The Department conducted 

this review in accordance with section 

751(a)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise subject to the order 

is SSB. The term SSB with respect to the 

order means articles of stainless steel in 

straight lengths that have been either 

hot-rolled, forged, turned, cold-drawn, 

cold-rolled or otherwise cold-finished, 

or ground, having a uniform solid cross 

section along their whole length in the 

shape of circles, segments of circles, 

ovals, rectangles (including squares), 

triangles, hexagons, octagons or other 

convex polygons. SSB includes coldfinished SSBs that are turned or ground 

in straight lengths, whether produced 

from hot-rolled bar or from straightened 

and cut rod or wire, and reinforcing bars 

that have indentations, ribs, grooves, or 

other deformations produced during the 

rolling process. Except as specified 

above, the term does not include 

stainless steel semi-finished products, 

cut-length flat-rolled products (i.e., cutlength rolled products which if less than 

4.75 mm in thickness have a width 

measuring at least 10 times the 

thickness, or if 4.75 mm or more in 

thickness having a width which exceeds 

150 mm and measures at least twice the 

thickness), wire (i.e., cold-formed 

products in coils, of any uniform solid 

cross section along their whole length, 

which do not conform to the definition 

of flat-rolled products), and angles, 

shapes and sections. The SSB subject to 

the order is currently classifiable under 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES