alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~­

k:::-- - IE= 

F--

~--

'1E~U . .ITY INF .~·~11AT:ON 

~--e~~9-u4 RE$TRl~~t =>1f)>N'.r3 

Pl!!M!r.:::!§B! ~!S! 

SUBm:r 1 Ctllawr• nudJ,,.ng Material. - -

-~: 

.. -, .. , 

? 0 '"(\'-~"-- c.l.. . 'S i.--

m.r.IaM F. 1"1UF.DMAH 

ccm.ill4nt 

, _
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



                   CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

     As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the use of our
report (and to all references to our Firm) included in or made part of this
Registration Statement.


                                             /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP



Boston, Massachusetts
September 30, 1999
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6603
EDWIN WAYNE JOYCE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ALVAN P. PUGH, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. William L. Osteen, Sr., District Judge. (CA-95-132-2) Submitted: October 31, 1996 Decided: November 25, 1996Before HALL, Circuit Judge, and BUTZNER and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edwin Wayne Joyce, Appellant Pro Se. Alvan P. Pugh, GAVIN, COX, PUGH, GAVIN & GAVIN, Asheboro, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting his motion to voluntarily dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) action, but requiring that he pay the filing fee and be represented by an attorney if he chooses to refile this action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Joyce v. Pugh , No. CA-95-132-2 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-2530

___________________________ Lidia Perez-Mancilla; Mairyn Villeda-Perez lllllllllllllllllllll Petitioner s

v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States 1

lllllllllllllllllllll Respondent

____________ Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

____________ Submitted: March 19, 2021 Filed: March 24, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before KELLY, ERICKSON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Guatemalan native and citizen Lidia Perez-Mancilla, individually and on behalf of her minor daughter Mairyn Villeda-Perez, petitions for review of an order of the

1 Attorney General Garland is substituted for his predecessor pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(c).Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), which dismissed her appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying her asylum and withholding of removal. 2 After careful review, assuming without deciding that Perez-Mancilla’s proposed particular social group of “Guatemalan women who are unable to leave a domestic relationship and who are treated as property” is cognizable, we conclude substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Perez-Mancilla failed to demonstrate membership in that group, particularly given that she had no ongoing contact with her alleged abuser and was in a new relationship. See Fuentes-Erazo v. Sessions, 848 F.3d 847, 852-53 (8th Cir. 2017) (standard of review); see also Godinez v. Barr, 929 F.3d 598, 602 (8th Cir. 2019); Najera v. Whitaker, 745 F. App’x 670, 671-72 (8th Cir. 2018) (per curiam). Because Perez-Mancilla therefore failed to satisfy her burden of proof on her asylum claim, the BIA properly concluded she necessarily failed to satisfy the more rigorous standard for withholding of removal. See Fuentes-Erazo, 848 F.3d at 853. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review.

______________________________

2 Because Villeda-Perez’s asylum application is derivative of her mother’s, all references are to Perez-Mancilla. See 8 U.S.C. § 1158(b)(3)(A) (stating that a child may be granted asylum if the accompanying principal noncitizen was granted asylum). There are no derivative benefits for withholding of removal. See Fuentes v. Barr, 969 F.3d 865, 868 n.1 (8th Cir. 2020) (per curiam). Perez-Mancilla has waived any challenge to the BIA’s denial of her motion to remand because she does not challenge it in her brief. See Chay-Velasquez v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 751, 756 (8th Cir. 2004) (concluding that a claim not raised or meaningfully argued in an opening brief is deemed waived). -2-
*Friday, July 2, 1999*

MOTION DOCKET

99-1124.

#### Tricke, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Liquor Control.

Hamilton App. No. C-980662.

This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to stay court of appeals’ judgment pending appeal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to stay be, and hereby is, granted.

Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
EX-10.1






Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.

2005 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




     Dresser-Rand Group Inc., a Delaware corporation, having established the Dresser-Rand Group
Inc. 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), and having reserved the right under Article VIII
thereof to amend the Plan, does hereby amend the Plan as follows:



     1. The definition of “Change in Control” set forth in Section 9.1 of the Plan is hereby
amended to read in its entirety as follows:



     “CHANGE IN CONTROL” means the first to occur of any of the following events:



     (i) during any 12-month period, the members of the Board (the “INCUMBENT DIRECTORS”)
cease for any reason other than due to death or disability to constitute at least a majority
of the members of the Board, PROVIDED that any director whose election, or nomination for
election by the Company’s stockholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the
members of the Board who are at the time Incumbent Directors shall be considered an
Incumbent Director, other than any such individual whose initial assumption of office occurs
as a result of an actual or threatened election contest with respect to the election or
removal of directors or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or
on behalf of a person other than the Board;




     (ii) the acquisition or ownership by any individual, entity or “group” (within the
meaning of Section 13(d)(3) of the Act), other than the Company or any of its Affiliates or
Subsidiaries, or any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the
Company or any of its Affiliates or Subsidiaries, of beneficial ownership (within the
meaning of Rule 13d-3 promulgated under the Act) of 50% or more of the combined voting power
of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities entitled to vote generally in the
election of directors;




     (iii) the merger, consolidation or other similar transaction of the Company, as a
result of which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to such merger,
consolidation or other transaction, do not, immediately thereafter, beneficially own,
directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the combined voting power of the voting securities
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the merged, consolidated or other
surviving company; and




     (iv) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets
of the Company to one or more persons or entities that are not, immediately prior to such
sale, transfer or other disposition, Affiliates of the Company.




A “Change in Control” shall not be deemed to occur if the Company undergoes a bankruptcy,
liquidation or reorganization under the United States Bankruptcy Code.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Dresser-Rand Group Inc. has caused these presents to be executed by its
duly authorized officer and be effective this 28th day of October, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	DRESSER-RAND GROUP INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Mark F. Mai
 	 
	 	 	Mark F. Mai 	 
	 	 	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary 	 




1
. ,"'. #' -· ~~ ,_ ,.· r• I • " .:: .. ~ 

,- r 

·• • .. ' 

'•I 

.. ' .. I 

~ROSS nrry·~ SHE . T 

• 

' File under No. Department-State" . . De.to 28 .Jan 49 .-

Type of Correspon.denoe: Radiogram CM IN 19817 

', 

Subject: Communicgtion Requirements at Shanghai 

F:rorn: AMEMBASSY Nanking China 

TO: Secretary of State 

\ 

Class ifi oa.tion., SECHE'l' 

l. 

. , 

• I 

, ... ~ .• ; ' ··--- ... • 1' ' 

t ~~~!'" ... -;: ...... , 

~ ·.-.~·· I ,.·I ... 

'1. ' .II - ' ' - -

• < .-~.--·- ••• ';Jll 

IL,~. ~ 

.... '-.. ?t.: 

. - ---..... - . '1\~ ,....,,,,.~­

... ~~ . 't'-~ .. 

• .. ... f 

.... ,, ~ ,.,'··.• .. ' ; .. ~ ,,.· . .:. . , ... . •;.;~~~ Synopsis: ~eference State· Army discussions China communications 

and emergency requirements meet needs event Navy wi th-drawal ·· --··-~ 

from Shanghai. 

t, 

\ 

'' . ' 

,. 

Dooumont ~iled under ~o. Attaches-US Military 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

I 

I .
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         593,863
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      12,635,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                 583,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,039,673
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                      7,622,998
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         5,210
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,824,409
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,039,673
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,068,605
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  464,044
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             504,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 88,809
<INCOME-TAX>                                    67,741
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             21,068
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,068
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .05


</TABLE>
REF ID:A62458 

'CeN~,IDE&'JTArA~ 

lO Jm1e 19.55 

I I PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

:arrtish Joint Sii"Vicea lfiasion 

Jiiin 1faV,f 

Dear Peter: 

In o. recent letter trolll ;J'DU11,& lfa.g.elin he .-nt!orur 

a til'm tradi!lg und.&r the mm Uneal C~pber eo. which 

ill trying to give the Sege11n C011tpany some COJIP*"t1tion 

tar bu.aiDeea 1n India. I mve:.'" heard ot aucb a f1ra 

but perbap.s you have or perbllpa acne ot ~our a.aeociates 

1n ILindan haYe. Afr¥ 1nf'Ol'aat1on \r"hicb ;you. can obtain 

tor me about this firlll llill be very zmch. a.ppr-eciated .. 

Bb.cercly, 

.";,_ .... '\ 

Declassified and appr~ved for release by NSA on 06-17-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
A PPELLANT ’ S U NOPPOSED M OTION FOR V OLUNTARY D ISMISSAL Page 1 

## Cause No

. 05

- 1 7

- 0 1439

- CV

______________________________________________ ____________________

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

IN DALLAS

__________________________________________________________________

I N THE I NTEREST OF C.J.M. AND S.C.M

. , C HILDREN

__________________________________________________________________ APPELLANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

__________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1) , Appellant Michael Minces

(“Appellant” ) files this Unopposed Motion for Voluntary Dismissal as follows:

1. Appellant requests that the Court dismiss this appeal on motion of

Appellant.

2

. This Court has authority to dismiss this appeal pursuant to Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1)

. See Production Drilling Co. v. Kirkwood &

Morgan, Inc ., 406 S.W.2d 792, 793 (Tex. Civ. App.

— San Antonio 1966, no writ)

( a ppellant ordinarily has right to seek dismissal of appeal at any time before it has

been heard and determined).

3

. There is no cross

- appeal pending in this matter

.

WHEREFORE, P REMISES CONSIDERED, Appellant Michael Minces

respectfully requests that this Court dismiss this appeal

. ACCEPTED 05-17-01439-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS 6/4/2018 1:34 PM LISA MATZ CLERKA PPELLANT ’ S U NOPPOSED M OTION FOR V OLUNTARY D ISMISSAL Page 2 Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Jeremy C. Martin Jeremy C. Martin Texas Bar Number 24033611 MALOUF & NOCKELS LLP 6688 N

. Central Expy. , Suite 1050 Dallas, Texas 75206 214

- 969

- 7373 (Telephone) 214

- 969

- 7648 (Facsimile)

ATTORNEY FOR APPEL LANT

CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE

I certify that I conferred with counsel for Appellee, and Appellee is un opposed to the relief requested herein. /s/ Jeremy C. Martin Jeremy C. Martin

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a true copy of the above was served on each attorney of record or party in accordance with the Texas Rules of A p p ellate Procedure on June 4 , 201 8

.
/s/ Jeremy C. Martin Jeremy C. Martin
Mr, Harold B. Beveraga 

Vice Preaident 

iCA laboratories 

66 !Jz"oa4 Street 

Bev York 4, Kev York 

Deal" Mr . '!eV•l"&P 1 

/ 

e8 Ma.r 1954 

ln reference to your recently •ubmitted faiw covering 

your trip to tba 111.tione.l S.cu.rity A&ency lut nok, our 

f:ln&nee ~ople have uked • to aend the incloaed tOX'1'119 to 

you. Plu.ae do not till in the illtornation. It ;you will me.t~ly 11gn where Uldicated, I vill. have the mcea.ary 

in!Ql'mliLtion t.ra.nacribed 1"rom your Mileaae and Pu Diem 

Intormtion Bbeet •o that ;you Yill be re!Dbureed u ~tly 

u potl1ble. An addre•1ed envelope ia 1ncloted. tar your 

eonv.n1ence. 

I am earry to be cauj1ng :rou thil inconvtnienca. 

• 

I Incl.a z .. ;. 

81nceraly, 

I. T. McDONAI.J) 

C..pte.in mo 

.A.tat to Executive Becretary 

5SA Scientific Adviaoey Board 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

\ 

\,
REF ID:A6873. e 

mm11•xca:x11111 

"24 I. Oeorge ·. &llOn .Drin 

.6rlington, lirg1n1a 

.\r!ra. :lorh&":". B. ..::t.J.ke:r, Sr. 

Courtland Apt. ~i42 

Lynchbm"g, 7irginia 

19 !.i1a7 1949 

I 1111st ha.at.an to thank 7ou tor the photostata w~1ch ,you 

aant ea and w': lch arrived eateq a rn da:r• ago. 1 a.-: &OJT7 

that )"llU did not include a bill coverlntJ the coat thereof. "i:on•t 

you kind.lg' let :ie know, ao that 1 can reimburse 7ou7 

'{cr.ir courteq and kind!'leu in aet!in-: and talking ... 1t'!1 Mr. 

Fawo.t.t and i:ie a coue:;le of ••k• a::;o a?>out t~e 'Reale rap81"1 waa 

deepq appreciated. Jomcd&.7 I ·~ come back a·:a1n to pester you ~·1th more que1tiona. 

Th&."1c1n:t you a;r-i.1n and witb cor<:1al zreeti?\:S to :fOU aa:1 

to your two nice ds.ughtere, I am 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-04-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
**Exhibit 32(2)****Certification of Principal Accounting Officer**     I, Jerry W. Fanska, Vice President—Finance and Treasurer, of Layne Christensen Company, dohereby certify in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (a) the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the annual period endedJanuary 31, 2005, which this certification accompanies, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and     (b) the information contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A forthe annual period ended January 31, 2005, which this certification accompanies,fairly presents, in all material aspects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.     Dated: October 31, 2005 */s/ Jerry W. Fanska*     Jerry W. Fanska    Vice President—Finance and Treasurer
"DDRl!:'ll'll OP'P'ICll//.L COMMUH•CATIONB' "RI 

THE SECRETARY OF STATE 

WASHINGTON ~S, D. C. 

• 

REF ID:A66978 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

WASHINGTON 

February 19,, 1948 

MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF, ARMY SECURJ. TY AGENCY 

Attention: CSGAS-82 

.. 

Reference is ma.de to our Purchase Order No. 1931-48 

of September 5,, 1947. It is requested that the following 

One Time Tapes be produced for the Department of State: 

Short Title 

SD:XX 

XXSD 

SD MUN 

Editions 

101-300 

101-300 

501-700 

~~ Captain,, USN,, 

Chief,, Division of Cryptography 

SECRET Jeclassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 04-15-2014 

Jursuantto E .0. 13526 

, . -
_.- . 

. ~ ... 

·, 

• '• 

REF ID:A6889 ... 

lfajor eerm.i 1rano11 Lanahan 

!heater APO ?S7t Slft'ioe c/o Po._.._.. ~' ltzropean ~-. P.r.;; t~k, ?:n tozk 

Dear Dutel 

Upon hie retu.m to this sta.tion fl'Cll a ftcmrt tour ot -. .... '.PO!U7 ctutr Sn the ~ 'l'baater, mu fr!edme.n baa nportecl 

on the ve~ intere~lng and ·:lU!te :flltomatiw expsr1oncea enooantered while "fia.1tb:tg the w.ri011S 1utallationa U1IC1iR' ~ 

CIO'llllDll. The oppat'ttmit1es attol'dad b!ll ror 4incn coatact w:l:Ui 

the peop'le ~ in e!gnal !ntellipnae an4 .tgna1 8"1J2"1t:r 

openU•• in your theater anc1 tor look'ng Jato the faail:lt!a• 

prvrSW tor the• opemt1ons1 under Earla Oook, hsve gi'Nll h1a 

a goo4 iD•ipt !nto loaa.1 ocnU.oUooa. !h1a wlll• I feel ma,. mbl.e ua to be of mtua1 a14 !n prcmtq tblt ac.ooeafrO. .. .._ pU,..._ ot our joint tub. _ 

- B11l baa &1.80 told r:ie ot ;your 1paoial ooart•BJ' in percomll1' ocaducting hla tbrough·tba 115.gnal 011Dter and other d.pl !uta'l• 

laUon1 at Fran1d'u:1i, wh1cb h9 ~0184 'N?7 mah. !he -. ~ 

t..tee Shawa h11ll b:f Earle an4 hie aasist&nts, 1n connection 'ld.t.1L 

UCON ·•rations, ga.ve h.1.m the oppt>l"tun1t7 to 1noraaae hi• mo.-

led• ot rattera that will be ver.r ueafU1 'fio the &NJ Seourlq 

....,. 

on., own bebalt and on beh< ot rr!ed-.n, I wilb, thefttole, 

to thank 10f1 for ycnar ~ courteaies. I hope 1011 will feel .tr. 

to· call upon 11'e it I can exeroi• a.D1' reoiprocit7 br attorcUnc 

eiatlar OPr..urtunities for member• ot ·10'JI' ere rat. 

Sinoerel.J' ~s, 

W. ~TOH C~ 

·- Br-lgadier Geml'&].• USA 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto _E.O. 1352a
'\ 

1' 

I ' I 

I 

REF ID:A65586 

COMMENTS OM "ETOUSA REVIDf OF COOK BOARD REPORT 

3. Concur 

9. Concur 

13. (1) It ia not advisable to redesign the SIGABA to permit 

simultaneous cutting ot tape with the printing operation 

because ot the J118.1W corldJ. tions ot usage where such a teature 

is not reqμired. There is now under developnent, and nearq 

completed, an attachment tor the SIGABA which 11111 provide 

this desired teature. 

(2) Concur. Projects have been initiated to develop equipment 

to suppq this need. (Converters B S07 ( )/U and Ml: S08 

( )/U.) 

(3) Csmcur. A device ot this type is now under development. I 

(Converter MX Sl9 ( )/TG.) 

@'pp roved for Release bv NSA on 04-18-2014 pursuant to E .0. 1352\3
EXHIBIT 32(b)




CERTIFICATION OF


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Company Report





(1)  The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: November 15, 2010
By:
/s/ John F. FerraroJohn F. FerraroTreasurer and Chief Financial Officer





This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1917 

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to an entity that receives compensation for facilitating the donation of fetal tissue derived from an 

abortion. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 3, 2015 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. KIRK, and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 

Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To prohibit the provision of Federal funds to an entity that 

receives compensation for facilitating the donation of 

fetal tissue derived from an abortion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON FUNDING. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi5 sion of law, no Federal funds shall be made available to 

6 any affiliate, subsidiary, successor, or clinic of the Planned 

7 Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., if that affiliate, 

8 subsidiary, successor, or clinic receives compensation for 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1917 IS

1 facilitating the donation of fetal tissue products derived 

2 from an abortion. 

3 (b) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

4 shall be construed to— 

5 (1) affect any limitation contained in an appro6 priations Act relating to abortion; or 

7 (2) reduce overall Federal funding available in 

8 support of women’s health. 

9 (c) INVESTIGATION AND REPORT.—Not later than 90 

10 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Attorney 

11 General shall conduct an investigation, and submit to Con12 gress a report on the findings of such investigation, con13 cerning whether or not the Planned Parenthood Federa14 tion of America, Inc., or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, 

15 successors, or clinics has engaged in any illegal activity 

16 pertaining to fetal tissue products. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS