alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
A-~~.~ 

____ j.-,f. ~ . s.J.~ 

REF ID:A68689 

• 

-- --~ ---"----- - - ------

------ --

- __ _}}·~-~--________...._ 

J·~~ 

--··-----", 

---=--c.~------------ --- ---- -------- -- ___ c,fJ. ~-· -

J-~-~--

J' :1f giir - - - --~--

----·- - --·-

----~----- ----- ------ - -------- ---. ---

-- -~ --- ----

_-_ _j~~ -~ 

- -----'---~~-~~--~~--.---o..-__::__.'---_..:._--~~ 

-------~----- - =---

----------- ---· _ .. ____________ __:~- - ------- --- ----

• 

---~-~,___ ___ --- - ------------------------
• REF ID:A68689 

·------------=---·--"""---·---'---__._ __ 

------- ----~~-~~---...:....~~--"""--

~---~-------~~~~-----------'----~! 

------·----~--~--~~~-_.__ __________ ~.......__;:_1 

-- - ----------~---~-----,__.__~~----'---~--~---=-

• 

-- ·- . -~--~~----~----"----~._,____ ______ ...____ 

------------~-
Exhibit 10.1

 

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO THE JANUS 401(K), PROFIT SHARING

AND EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN

 

The Janus 401(k), Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended as follows:

 

1.                                       Effective as of July 1, 2011, the Plan is hereby renamed the Janus 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, and a new sentence is hereby added to the end of the last paragraph of the Background section of the Plan to read as follows:

 

The Plan was amended as of July 1, 2011 to change its name to the Janus 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan.

 

2.                                       Effective as of July 1, 2011, Section 1.55 hereby is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

 

1.55      “Plan,” “Plan and Trust” and “Trust” mean the Janus 401(k) and Employee Stock Ownership Plan (formerly know as the  Janus 401(k), Profit Sharing and Employee Stock Ownership Plan). The Plan identification number is 001. Pursuant to Code Section 401(a)(27), the Plan is designated a profit sharing plan and pursuant to Code Section 401(a)(23) is designated a stock bonus plan. Furthermore, the Plan includes provisions within the meaning of Code Sections 401(k) and 401(m).

 

3.                                       Effective as of July 1, 2011, the Plan is hereby amended to replace the terms “Profit Sharing Account” and “Profit-Sharing Non-Elective Account” in each place stated with the term “Employer Contribution Account.”

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Janus Capital Group Inc. has executed this Amendment as of this 19th day of July, 2011.

 

 

	
 
    	
Janus Capital   Group Inc.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Gregory A.   Frost
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Gregory A. Frost
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Executive Vice   President,
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Chief Financial   Officer and Treasurer
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
ATTEST:
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10832

Summary Calendar

In the Matter of MARSHALL STEWART PHILLIPS, III,

Debtor.

______________________________

HARVEY L. MORTON,

Appellant,

VERSUS

MARSHALL STEWART PHILLIPS, III; STEVE SCHNEIDER,

Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(6:98-CV-25-C)

January 28, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED for the reasons

given by the district court in its order dated June 12, 1998.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit 

 Chicago, Illinois 60604

December 8, 2010

Before

     RICHARD A. POSNER, Circuit Judge

     JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

     DIANE S. SYKES, Circuit Judge

No. 10‐1963

AMERICAN BANK,

     Plaintiff‐Appellant,

          v.

DOVETAIL INCORPORATED,

MICHELLE PETERSON and

EVAN PETERSON,

          Defendants‐Appellees.

   

Appeal from the United States

District Court for the Northern

District of Indiana, Hammond

Division.

No. 4:09‐cv‐0064‐TLS‐APR

Theresa L. Springmann, Judge.

    

O R D E R 

Upon consideration of the motion filed by the defendants on December 2, 2010 to amend

the opinion in this case issued on November 29, 2010, the sentence on page 3 of the slip opinion,

beginning (ʺIn an example of”) is deleted and the following sentence substituted:

(Menashaʹs brief barely mentions, and does not discuss, the public‐records law and

contains no citation to it, as if to insinuate that there is no legal basis for American Bankʹs

insisting on compliance with the request and as if therefore the stay granted by the

district court did not preempt state law.)
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

 

SOPHIE ELLISON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2025

)

REEMPLOYMENT ASSISTANCE )

APPEALS COMMISSION and MAHNAZ )

QAYYUM MEDICAL ENTERPRISES, LLC, )

)

Appellee. )

) 

Opinion filed March 23, 2018.

Appeal from the Reemployment

Assistance Appeals Commission.

Sophie Ellison, pro se.,

Amanda L. Neff, Chief Appellate Counsel,

Tallahassee, for Reemployment Assistance

Appeals Commission. 

No appearance for the remaining

Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

LaROSE, C.J., and CRENSHAW and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                       5,484,929
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,489,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,934,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,331,975
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,863,052
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                     94,722,388
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,773,338
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             133,496,627
<DEPOSITS>                                 116,877,567
<SHORT-TERM>                                   180,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,361,342
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,529,779
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       400,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,147,939
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             133,496,627
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,547,193
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              405,334
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             2,952,527
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,166,615
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,236,762
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,715,765
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   16,500
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   4
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,372,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                743,137
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     508,732
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   508,732
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1,263
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1,263
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    566,235
<LOANS-PAST>                                   214,171
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,781,013
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   65,938
<RECOVERIES>                                    41,763
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,773,338
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,773,338
        

</TABLE>
NO. 07-02-0205-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

AUGUST 20, 2002

______________________________

LUPE MANUEL MEDELLIN, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 64TH DISTRICT COURT OF SWISHER COUNTY;

NO. A3673-0201; HONORABLE JACK R. MILLER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before BOYD, C.J., and REAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ.

ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Pursuant to a plea of guilty, appellant Lupe Manuel Medellin was convicted of

indecency with a child and punishment was assessed at ten years confinement. Although

represented by appointed counsel at trial, appointed counsel corresponded with appellant

notifying him that pursuant to his guilty plea, he could only appeal with permission of the
2

trial court and suggested that he file a pro se notice of appeal. Appellant, proceeding pro

se, timely perfected his appeal. Both the clerk’s record and reporter’s record have been

filed. Appellant’s brief was due to be filed by June 27, 2002, but has yet to be filed. Also,

no motion for extension of time has been filed. By letter dated July 23, 2002, this Court

notified appellant of the defect and also directed him to explain by August 5, 2002, why the

brief has not been filed. Appellant did not respond and the brief remains outstanding.

Therefore, we now abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for

further proceedings pursuant to Rule 38.8(b)(2) and (3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure. Upon remand, the trial court shall immediately cause notice of a hearing to be

given and, thereafter conduct a hearing to determine the following:

1. whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal; and

2. whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel.

The trial court shall cause the hearing to be transcribed. Should it be determined that

appellant desires to continue the appeal and is indigent, then the trial court shall also take

such measures as may be necessary to assure appellant effective assistance of counsel,

which measures may include the appointment of new counsel. If new counsel is

appointed, the name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of said counsel

shall be included in the order appointing new counsel. Finally, the trial court shall execute

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and such orders as the court may enter regarding the

aforementioned issues, and cause its findings and conclusions to be included in a
3

supplemental clerk's record. A supplemental record of the hearing shall also be included

in the appellate record. Finally, the trial court shall file the supplemental clerk's record and

the supplemental reporter's record with the Clerk of this Court by Friday, October 4, 2002.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File
Nos. 033-75934, 333-04280, 333-08047, 333-75339, 333-43802, 333-67504, 333-100753, 333-125882,
333-125883, 333-145334, 333-145337, 333-150069 and 333-152998) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 333-05939,
333-37921, 333-87157, 333-94859, 333-48936, 333-67328, 333-103950, 333-111522, 333-116533,
333-128527, 333-136673, 333-139897, 333-145335 and 333-150070) of our reports dated March 10, 2009 relating to the consolidated
financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for each of the years ended December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 of SatCon Technology Corporation and its subsidiaries, which appear in this Form 10-K.

/s/
Vitale, Caturano, and Company, P.C.

Boston,
Massachusetts

March 12,
2009

---



QuickLinks
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1905 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make permanent the reduced 

recognition period for built-in gains for S corporations. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 30, 2015 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself and Mr. CARDIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to make 

permanent the reduced recognition period for built-in 

gains for S corporations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDUCED RECOGNITION PERIOD FOR BUILT-IN 

4 GAINS MADE PERMANENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (7) of section 1374(d) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking subparagraphs (A), (B), (C), 

8 and (D), 

9 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as sub10 paragraph (B), and 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1905 IS

1 (3) by inserting before subparagraph (B) (as so 

2 redesignated) the following new subparagraph: 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘recognition 

4 period’ means the 5-year period beginning with 

5 the 1st day of the 1st taxable year for which 

6 the corporation was an S corporation. For pur7 poses of applying this section to any amount in8 cludible in income by reason of distributions to 

9 shareholders pursuant to section 593(e), the 

10 preceding sentence shall be applied without re11 gard to the phrase ‘5-year’.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# CE2004084EN.01026601.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/266 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/266

---

(2004/C 84 E/0313)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3921/03

by María Bergaz Conesa (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(18 December 2003)

Subject:   Illegal practices in use of water from the Segura Basin (Murcia, Spain)

Subject:

The Spanish State Prosecutor is currently investigating illegal practices with regard to use of water from the Segura Basin, the laxity of the Hydrographical Confederation in prosecuting illegal extraction of water and the favouritism shown to certain businesses. Before the chief prosecutor of the Madrid High Court of Justice, the chairman of the Segura Hydrographic Confederation has acknowledged that most of the cases brought against alleged illegal water extraction had lapsed.

The legal proceedings currently involve the trial of a business group which is accused of using political contacts in order to commit an alleged fraud, by manipulating European subsidies for the re-afforestation of a burnt-out wood, a process which ended with the installation of drip irrigation.

It is intended that the Segura Basin will receive 450 hm3 from the Ebro water transfer.

3

Is the Commission aware of the large number of existing irregularities in controls on illegal extractions of water from the Segura Basin?

Is the Commission aware of the alleged fraud involving European subsidies?

Is the Commission aware of other, similar cases?

Does the Commission intend to decide the funding of the Ebro water transfer before these irregularities are identified and resolved?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(18 February 2004)

(18 February 2004)

The Commission is aware through public sources that the Spanish judicial authorities are conducting enquiries into alleged illegal practices relating to the use and allocation of water resources and to the possible misuse of European subsidies relating to the Segura basin. The European Anti Fraud Office (OLAF) remains available to provide assistance to the Spanish judicial authorities in the event that such assistance is required.

The Commission is also aware, again through public sources, that there are many allegations/denouncements of illegal abstractions of water in the Segura as well as in other river basins in the South-East of Spain.

The Commission's future decision concerning the possible allocation of Community funds for the implementation of the Ebro transfer will be made according to the existing rules and procedures as set down in the relevant regulations, and in full compliance with the applicable Community legislation and policies including those relating to the environment.

---
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 43 (Thursday, March 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05221]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FARM CREDIT ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Regular Meeting

AGENCY: Farm Credit Administration Board, Farm Credit Administration.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Government in the 
Sunshine Act, of the regular meeting of the Farm Credit Administration 
Board (Board).

DATE AND TIME: The regular meeting of the Board will be held at the 
offices of the Farm Credit Administration in McLean, Virginia, on March 
12, 2015, from 9:00 a.m. until such time as the Board concludes its 
business.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm 
Credit Administration Board, (703) 883-4009, TTY (703) 883-4056.

ADDRESSES: Farm Credit Administration, 1501 Farm Credit Drive, McLean, 
Virginia 22102-5090. Submit attendance requests via email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d88eb1abb1acb7aa8abda9adbdabac989e9b99f6bfb7ae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="66300f150f120914340317130315122620252748010910">[email protected]</span></a>. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for further 
information about attendance requests.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Parts of this meeting of the Board will be 
open to the public (limited space available), and parts will be closed 
to the public. Please send an email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b3e5dac0dac7dcc1e1d6c2c6d6c0c7f3f5f0f29dd4dcc5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d086b9a3b9a4bfa282b5a1a5b5a3a490969391feb7bfa6">[email protected]</span></a> at least 
24 hours before the meeting. In your email include: Name, postal 
address, entity you are representing (if applicable), and telephone 
number. You will receive an email confirmation from us. Please be 
prepared to show a photo identification when you arrive. If you need 
assistance for accessibility reasons, or if you have any questions, 
contact Dale L. Aultman, Secretary to the Farm Credit Administration 
Board, at (703) 883-4009. The matters to be considered at the meeting 
are:

Open Session

A. Approval of Minutes

<bullet> February 12, 2015

B. Reports

<bullet> Report on Farm Credit System's Funding Condition
<bullet> Farm Credit System Building Association Auditor's Report on 
2014 Financial Audit

Closed Executive Session *
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    * Session Closed-Exempt pursuant to 5 U.S.C. Section 552b(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Reports

<bullet> Farm Credit Building Association Auditor's Report

    Dated: March 3, 2015.
Dale L. Aultman,
Secretary, Farm Credit Administration Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-05221 Filed 3-3-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6705-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
97-2186.

#### Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. Chandler.

On April 22,1998, this court indefinitely suspended respondent, Everett Alfred Chandler, from the practice of law pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(2). On March 29, 1999, this court, *sua*spowte, ordered respondent to show cause why he should not be found in contempt for failure to comply with this court’s April 22,1998 order, to wit, failure to surrender his Certificate of Admission and failure to file an affidavit of compliance on or before May 22, 1998. Respondent did not respond to the show cause order. On May 12, 1999, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion for order to appear and show cause, requesting the court to issue an order directing respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be found in contempt for his failure to comply with this court’s April 22, 1998 order. On June 29, 1999, this court, *sua sponte,*ordered that, in regard to the show cause order issued by this court on March 29,1999, respondent appear- in person before this court on Wednesday, July 28,1999, at 9:00 a.m. The court further granted movant’s motion and ordered respondent to show cause why he should not be found in contempt for failure to obey this court’s April 22,1998 order, by filing a written response with the court at or before 9:00 a.m. on July 28,1999. Respondent did not appear- before the court or file a written response to the show cause order on July 28, 1999. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that a warrant be issued to the Sheriff of Cuyahoga County for the arrest of respondent, Everett Alfred Chandler, Attorney Registration No. 0030888, last known business address in Cleveland, Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, *sua sponte,*that the Clerk of the Supreme Court be, and hereby is, authorized to release to the appropriate law enforcement officials any information concerning the respondent that might otherwise be confidential, including but not limited to respondent’s Social Security number, for the purpose of facilitating execution of the warrant issued for the arrest of respondent.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, *1478including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney Registration Office.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1).

Douglas, X, would find respondent in contempt.
**Exhibit 32**

 

**WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP** 

**FORM 10-QSB SEPTEMBER 30, 2006**

 

 

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winthrop Residential Associates I, A Limited Partnership, (the “Partnership”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
| Date:  November 14, 2006 | /s/ Eggert Dagbjartsson_____ |
|--------------------------|------------------------------|
|                     | Eggert Dagbjartsson          |  
 

Chief Executive Officer

 
 

Date:  November 14, 2006

/s/Andrew Prague                    

 

Andrew Prague

 
 

Chief Financial Officer

 
 

 

18

 

  |