alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> UT
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      212,319
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      2,517
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          64,791
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        20,244
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   5,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 304,892
<COMMON>                                         6,007
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       59,873
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             33,723
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  99,603
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,200
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            93,061
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                              17,146
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    3,313
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  88,569
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  304,892
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      157,607
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             7,347
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     132,174
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     139,521
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         18,086
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                 293
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  18,379
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         4,257
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,122
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        209
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   13,913
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         3,227
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        3,244
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          17,499
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.32
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 52 (Wednesday, March 18, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05372]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2014-0941]

Port Access Route Study: In the Chukchi Sea, Bering Strait and 
Bering Sea

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published a document in the Federal Register 
of February 19, 2015, (80 FR 8892) concerning the Port Access Route 
Study (PARS) in the Chukchi Sea, Bering Strait and Bering Sea. The 
February 19, 2015, PARS document was erroneously published and should 
be disregarded in its entirety.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice 
of study or any of the meetings, call or email LT Kody Stitz, 
Seventeenth Coast Guard District (dpw); telephone (907) 463-2270; email 
[email protected] or Mr. David Seris, Seventeenth Coast Guard 
District (dpw); telephone (907) 463-2267; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For correct information on the Port Access 
Route Study please see the Notice of Study published in the Federal 
Register on December 5, 2014 (79 FR 72157); and the Notice of Public 
Meetings published in the Federal Register on February 25, 2015 (80 FR 
10137).
    To electronically access all information referenced in this notice 
of correction visit http://www.regulations.gov and search for ``USCG-
2014-0941''.

    Dated: March 3, 2015.
D.B. Abel,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Seventeenth Coast Guard 
District.
[FR Doc. 2015-05372 Filed 3-17-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P
```
. ' . • 

Op-20-S-3/rah 

CONFIDENTIAl 26 April 1943 

ME:MORANDUM FOR COLONEL COOK: 

I was not surprised today to hear Captain Stephenson 

say that you would not be able to provide me with exact translations or the messages in question. My purpose, of course, 

was to avoid the necessity of asking you to check the paraphrases. However, it is either that now or no further 

progress. 

Accordingly, I am forwarding herewith a copy of 

the ONI brief of State Department telegrams with the request that you have these paraphrases checked insofar as 

practicable against the exact translations. It should not 

be necessary to do them all, but I would appreciate as 

comprehensive an analysis as you may find practicable. 

I would not like to have the State Department know abqut this matter since it is at the moment a matter 

strictly between me and.ONI. I shall have to be guided 

by the conclusions at which your representative arrives 

and so request that he not submit any conclusions which 

will put me out on a limb. 

Ra7TifZ_ 

'DENSFORD 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-17-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
## UNITED STATES ARMY COUR T OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

Before HAIGHT, PENLAND, and WOLFE Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES, Appellee

v. Staff Sergeant RODERICK N. PUGH United States Army, Appellant

ARMY 20140176

Headquarters, Fort Stewart John T. Rothwell, Milit ary Judge (arraignment) Richard Weis, Milita ry Judge (trial) Colonel Francisco A. Vila, Staff Judge Advocate

For Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Ch arles D. Lozano, JA; Major Aaron R. Inkenbrandt, JA; Captain Amanda R. McNeil, JA (on brief).

For Appellee: Major A.G. Courie, III, JA; Major John K. Choike, JA; Captain Jaclyn E. Shea, JA (on brief).

8 October 2015

---------------------------------- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

----------------------------------

Per Curiam:

A military judge sitting as a special court-martial convicted appellant, pursuant to his pleas, of false official statement a nd larceny, in viol ation of Articles 107 and 121, Uniform Code of Military Jus tice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 907 and 921 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The military judge sentenced ap pellant to a bad-conduct discharge and one mont h of confinement. The conve ning authority approved the adjudged sentence.

This case is before us for review under Article 66, UCMJ. Appellant assigns
two errors and raises matters pursuant to United States v. Grostefon , 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982). One of the assigned errors warrants br ief discussion and relief.

DISCUSSION

In one specification, appellant was charged with, pleaded guilty to, and convicted of stealing three distinct allowa nces, with a total va lue of $26, 408.51, “on divers occasions.” While appellant ackn owledges that divers allowances werePUGH – ARMY 20140176

2 stolen, he now correc tly asserts that he only stole $26,408.51 once, not multiple
times. The st ipulation of fact a nd providence inquiry support and confirm appellant’s assertion. Acco rdingly, we will gr ant appellant’s requ ested relief of amending the larceny specification by rem oving the words “on di vers occasions.”

CONCLUSION

The court amends and AFFI RMS only so much of the finding of guilty of Charge II and its Spec ification as provides:

Charge II, The Specification: In that [appellant], U.S. Army, did, at or near Yongson, Repu blic of Korea,
between on or about 11 June 20 10 and on or about 10 July 2011, steal Basic Allowance fo r Housing (BAH), Cost of Living Allowance (COLA), and Dislocation Allowance (DLA), totaling a value of about $26,408.51, the property
of the United States Government.

The remaining findings of guilty and the sentence ar e AFFIRMED. All rights, privileges, and property of wh ich appellant was deprived by virtue of that portion of his findings being set as ide by this decision are hereby ordered restored.

FOR THE COURT:

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR.
Clerk of Court MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR.
Clerk of Court FOR THE COURT:
,.~, 

~/ 

I' 

- --~----~ 

REF ID:A66850 

CONFIOE:-~TIAl=i 

EPP!!B!i : •!!!"! P_:!!!w'1!' 

~~~:.~.t11A1 

.... 

I <lif.1 M.r '1el't!!iM !'flt.W 

• 1M" 1!1-t#,, HIS Notfl 

•1 ~ 

:t-~i (2) 

Prof, ~on c/o s/A'!!f'>T. 

1'/lh klt-e..";ll~"\&tor;. 

w.v,M>Grtson/cono/4 Aug 5J-ob:i 

SEGl:JRlTV AHfOHMAHwn 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                              19
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,563
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,412
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,623
<BONDS>                                          1,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               38
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,706)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,412
<SALES>                                             58
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    58
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    55
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  73
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (160)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (160)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (20)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (190)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
REF 

Serial• I o 0 5 

Colonel lobert W. G:ritfin, Ul.Q 

Cb.1et, Cc&:mtJ..11tcatioms Divi•ion 

llesdque.rte%11, Air Cocnatd a.ad. 8tatt School 

HD.xvtll At.r J'OX'C4) Jue, Ale.Mma 

Dear Colonel Grittilu 

I 'f 4 J-1,- I '1 ~-it 

~ 701.J. tor )"OUr letter at 20 J&nUtU"Y 1954. 

The atticial ftfl\WIBt tor Jiii lecture baa t~ 

arrived ar.4 an ottic1al accept.::ince v1ll .oon be on 1ta 

~ date Md. t1mo tea: 'II/I t.a.lk are atilltactar,y. 

I will tra'\'el v1& eo1110: •:rc:1al. air and vill 114.viH later 

M to t.lMJ date ar:d hour ot ~ arrbal at. Mcmtgamery. 

Look1 r:i& t01'Wa1'd to aeeing 10U ._1n, I • 

6incereJ.¥, 

cc: AG 

c/s 

s/ M3ST (Mr. Frilednan) 

M/R; Acknowle~nt o-J: in:f'orma.l. request for Mr. Fried:iran 

to lecture at Maxwell AF.B,Ala. 

M.M. Fe1erski/S/ ASST/60493/ll3Feb 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

-... ...... -. ... iiiiiii-...~-
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10
- 23
- 00110
- C R IN RE BOBBY ROY CHILDERS
Original Proceeding From the 54th District Court McLennan County, Texas Trial Court No. 2008
- 466
- C1

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This is an original proceeding in which relator Bobby Roy Childers, a pro se
inmate , challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to su pport the assessment of fees, court costs, attorney fees and fines in trial court cause number 2008

- 466

- C1.
In a criminal mandamus , the relator must show that he has no adequate remedy at law and what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act not involving a discretionary or judicial decision. In re Pierce , 586 S.W.3d 566, 569 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2019, orig. proceeding ). An act is minist erial if relator can show a clear right to the relief sought. Id.In re Childers Page 2

Mandamus is not available to compel a discretionary act as distinguished from a
ministerial act. Id

. The sufficiency of the evidence to support assessments of costs contained within judgm ents may be directly appealed. See Mayer v. State , 309 S.W.3d 552, 555 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010). The judgment he complains of was rendered more than a decade ago and the time for appealing that judgment has long since passed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.2

. Be cause relator has failed to show that he lacks an adequate remedy at law, he has not
met his burden to obtain mandamus relief. In re Pierce , 586 S.W.3d at 569. The petition for writ of mandamus filed on April 12, 2023 by relator Bobby Roy
Childers is deni ed.

STEVE SMITH Justice Before Chief Justice Gray Justice Johnson Justice Smith Petition denied Opinion issued and filed May 24 , 2023 [OT06 ]
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ISCO International, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ JOHN THODE         
|John Thode             
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 31, 2006         
|                       
|/s/ FRANK CESARIO      
|Frank Cesario          
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 31, 2006         



-46-
# United States Navy

**- Marine Corps**  **Court of Criminal Appeals**

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Jordan D. ANDERSON Private (E

- 1 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant
No. 201800307 Appeal from the United States Nav y - Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

. Decid ed: 4 April 2019

. Military Judges : Lieutenant Colonel Mark Sameit, USMC (arraign ment); Lieutenant Colonel Jeffrey V. Munoz, USMC (trial). Sentence a djudged 13 July 2018 by a general court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton , California consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence approved by convening authority : confinement for 13 months , and a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Commander C. Eric Roper , JAGC, USN

. For Appellee: Brian K. Keller , Esq.

_______________________ __ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________ Before FULTON, CRISFIELD , and A TTANASIO , Appellate Military Judges.United States v. Anderson , No. 201 800307

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submi tted without assignment of error, we have determined that the approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the a ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. Articles 59 and 6 6, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 86 6. T he findings and sentence as a pproved by the convening authority are AFFIRMED

.
FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman WESLEY K. FINKTON

United States Air Force

ACM S32 277

6 January 2016

Sentence adjudged 17 October 201 4 by SP CM convened at Fairchild Air

Force Base, W ashington

. Military Judge: Vance H. Spath

.

Approved S entence: Bad

- conduct discharge, confinement for 3 month s

, hard labor without confinement for 3 months, forfeitures of $1021.00 pay

per month for 12 months and reduction to E

- 1

.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Judith A. Walker;

Major Thomas A. Smith and Captain Jonathan D. Legg

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Major Mary Ellen Payne and

Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire

.

Before

ALLRED, TELLER , and ZIMMER MAN

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent

under Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4

.



### PER CURIAM :

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error

materially prejudicia l to the substantial rights of the appellant occ urred. Article 66(c),

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed , 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000).

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

LEAH M. CALAHAN

Clerk of the Court
# CE2004084EN.01063502.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/635 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/635

---

(2004/C 84 E/0714)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0610/04

by Graham Watson (ELDR) to the Commission

(1 March 2004)

Subject:   Irish stud farms

Subject:

Would the Commission comment on the issue of tax breaks given by the Irish Government to stud farms? Each year Irish stud farms earn from the ‘nomination fees’ that an owner receives when a stallion impregnates a mare, and yet pay nothing in tax. This gives them a major advantage over British stud farms, resulting in lost revenue and jobs in the UK.

Joint answer

to Written Questions E-0592/04 and E-0610/04

given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(2 April 2004)

(2 April 2004)

The Commission has received a formal complaint in this matter and is investigating the issue. Before the investigation has been finalized, the Commission is not in a position to indicate whether the scheme is compatible with the EC Treaty.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-2000

<CASH>                                            133,012
<SECURITIES>                                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   3,310,639
<ALLOWANCES>                                       23,000
<INVENTORY>                                     4,920,254
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                8,834,611
<PP&E>                                          6,830,317
<DEPRECIATION>                                  1,324,093
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 15,499,025
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           6,629,059
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0
<COMMON>                                           41,060
<OTHER-SE>                                      4,855,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   15,499,025
<SALES>                                        11,681,842
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,694,623
<CGS>                                           8,528,862
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   2,837,290
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                371,221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (42,750)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (15,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (27,750)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (27,750)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (.01)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0000351498
<NAME>                                         US1 INDUSTRIES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  6,179,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                   156,624
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               6,791,427
<PP&E>                                         22,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                 63,615
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 6,981,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          5,666,977
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    953,826
<COMMON>                                       40,844,296
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   6,981,432
<SALES>                                        11,593,128
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               11,592,128
<CGS>                                          11,311,135
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  11,311,135
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               25,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (160,958)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                169,912
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            169,912
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   169,912
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>