alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

99-869.

#### Tribett v. Mestek, Inc.

Jefferson App. No. 99JE1. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of the applications for dismissal by Mestek, Inc. and Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel Corporation,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the applications for dismissal be, and hereby are, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
# CE2004084EN.01019901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/199 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/199

---

(2004/C 84 E/0242)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0317/04

by Nicholas Clegg (ELDR) to the Commission

(6 February 2004)

Subject:   Pork by-products

Subject:

Is it correct that the EU plans to ban the sale of all pork by-products unless cooked? Is the Commission aware that raw pork products contain digestive enzymes which provide relief to enzyme-deficient animals who might otherwise suffer? What assurances can the Commission give that raw pork products will be available for animal consumption for medicinal purposes?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(16 March 2004)

(16 March 2004)

Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the Parliament and of the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption (1) requires that any protein, except some such as milk or colostrum, is heat treated before being given to farm animals.

1

Furthermore, Article 22 of the same Regulation prohibits intra-species recycling. In accordance with this prohibition, the feeding of processed animal proteins derived from one species to animals of the same species, including the case of pigs, is banned.

However, without prejudice of the above mentioned Regulation, enzymes and micro-organisms may be authorized in accordance with Council Directive 70/524/EEC of 23 November 1970 concerning additives in feedstuffs (2).

2

The purpose of these rules is to minimize the risk to public and animal health from material derived from animals.

---

(1)  OJ L 273, 10.10.2002.

1

(2)  OJ L 270, 14.12.1970.

2

---
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1853 

To limit the availability of funding for contributions to the United Nations 

if the arms embargo on Iran pursuant to United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1747 and 1929 is lifted. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 23, 2015 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To limit the availability of funding for contributions to the 

United Nations if the arms embargo on Iran pursuant 

to United Nations Security Council Resolutions 1747 

and 1929 is lifted. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Block Arms to Iran 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1853 IS

1 SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON FUNDING FOR UNITED NATIONS IF 

2 ARMS EMBARGO ON IRAN IS LIFTED. 

3 Of the amounts appropriated or otherwise made 

4 available for the Department of State for ‘‘Contributions 

5 to International Organizations’’ and available for con6 tributions to the United Nations, 20 percent may not be 

7 obligated or expended for such purpose if the arms embar8 go on Iran pursuant to paragraphs 5 and 6 of United Na9 tions Security Council Resolution 1747 (2007) and para10 graph 8 of United Nations Security Council Resolution 

11 1929 (2010) is lifted, reduced, or otherwise eased, not12 withstanding paragraph 13 of United Nations Security 

13 Council Resolution 1747 (2007) and paragraph 37 of 

14 United Nations Security Council 1929 (2010). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Illinois Superconductor Corporation and in the related
prospectuses of our report, dated February 25, 2000, with respect to the
financial statements and schedule of Illinois Superconductor Corporation
included in this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the
year ended December 31, 2000.

|                    |  |          |           | 
|------------------- |  | -------- | --------- | 
|Commission File No.
|                   
|Form S-3            |  | Form S-8
|                    |  |         
|333-45406           |  |          | 333-39342 | 
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-46658           |  |          | 333-06003 | 
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-59344           |  |          | 333-88716 | 
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-53646           |  |          | 333-49268 | 
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-53338          
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-56601          
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-41731          
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-36089          
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-29797          
|                   
|                   
|                   
|                   
|333-02846          



| | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP
| | ---------------------

Chicago, Illinois
April 30, 2001
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY INCLUDED UNDER ITEM 8 OF THIS
FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                           7,935
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   51,117
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,029)
<INVENTORY>                                     59,445
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,336
<PP&E>                                         271,493
<DEPRECIATION>                               (183,840)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 235,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,511
<BONDS>                                         80,035
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            97
<OTHER-SE>                                      96,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   235,860
<SALES>                                        289,586
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               289,586
<CGS>                                          235,401
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  249,721
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,691
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   120
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,894
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,732
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,428
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (126)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,302
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.08
        

</TABLE>
· .... - ~.J"' ~ --..... ,~ ... _--... 1. J ,..,_ ~- - • ~ 

REF ID:A63613 

Mr. 'V. J. Galbraith 

3).0 Sec®d. Street, s.1. Wuld.~ 31 n. o. 

e6 J~ l955 

lfN:&e&er, Gcrrernment Service• Deparbnent 

l'oto:rllLc lU.eatric Power Co.mpq' 

l.Otb and. I 8treet11 lortnwerat 

'Wahington 4, »• c. 

Dear Mr. Oalbraitbs 

l reter to certain eoneapondence excbe.Xlaed between ua 

la.et llovelDber, ill connection. vi.th & ...:U almninWll #VU.Oture 

•t the c:orner ot a.cQnd. P4 c streote, a.x. 

~ atru.cturo wu removed a tev de.1• -.;o1 aa torecaet 

in )'our letter ot 9 '.IOYelllbe1"1 M4. I vi•h to ~ you aDd. 

all other• concerned nth it• J'em0Val1 an aetion that bu 

mu.ch 1Dlproved the appeal'anCe ot that corner. 

Y•rr tru.lT )'0Ur•1 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

•
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 23.1


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form F-3 (Nos. 333-103033, 333-107363, 333-114099 and 333-124385) and
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 33-76384, 333-220, 333-5532, 333-7762
and 333-124384) pertaining to the Employee Share Option Plan of Trinity Biotech
plc of our report dated March 31, 2006, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Trinity Biotech plc included in this Annual
Report Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.




KPMG

Dublin, Ireland
March 31, 2006
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 14, 2019

No. 04-18-00727-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF K.M.J., A CHILD,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-PA-02187

Honorable Martha Tanner, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant A.J. is the presumed father of K.M.J. and A.N.J., though the children were 

born of different mothers. In separate causes, the Department petitioned to terminate A.J.’s 

rights to each of the children, and the causes were tried together. The trial court terminated 

A.J.’s parental rights to the children, and he filed a notice of appeal in each cause. A.J. is 

represented by the same court-appointed appellate counsel in each appeal.

After the appellate records and A.J.’s briefs were filed, the Department moved to 

consolidate the appeals. Having considered the motion to consolidate, we conclude that the 

appeals should be consolidated for all remaining briefs and any oral argument. The 

Department’s motion to consolidate the appeals is GRANTED.

The parties shall file all remaining motions, briefs, and other documents as if the two 

appeals were one case, but shall include both appeal numbers with the style of the case. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.3(a). The records for the two appeals shall remain separated. 

If the appeals are submitted on oral argument, both appeals shall be argued together as a 

single appeal; the court will decide the total time limit for each side. See id. R. 39.3. The court 

will dispose of the entire case with the same judgment, opinion, and mandate. This order does 

not extend the existing briefing schedule.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of January, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 26, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00218-CV

DR. RHODESIER LASTRAP, LONNIE GLISPIE, RACHEL TAYLOR, 

AND DEBORAH WYNN, Appellants

V.

UTOPIA LASTRAP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 61st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-45078

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants Dr. Rhodesier Lastrap, Lonnie Glispie, Rachel Taylor, and 

Deborah Wynn bring a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that is not 

otherwise appealable. Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 28.3(c) provides that [t]he 

petition must be filed within 15 days after the order to be appealed is signed.” Tex. 

R. App. 28.3(c). Under rule 28.3(d) “[t]he court of appeals may extend the time to 

file the petition if the party: (1) files the petition within 15 days after the deadline, 
2

and (2) files a motion complying with Rule 10.5(b).” Id. 28.3(d). 

The interlocutory order appellants attempt to appeal was signed by the trial 

court on February 14, 2022. The deadline for appellants to have filed their petition 

was March 1, 2022. See id. 28.3(c). The deadline for appellants to have filed a 

motion for extension of time, with the petition for permission to appeal the 

interlocutory order, was March 16, 2022. See id. 28.3(d). Appellants filed their 

notice of appeal on March 24, 2022—more than thirty days after the order appellants 

want to appeal was signed and eight days after the deadline for requesting an 

extension to time to file their petition. Appellants did not appeal the order until after 

the deadline for filing an extension had passed. Therefore, relator’s appeal is 

untimely. Moreover, appellants have not filed their petition for permission to appeal 

the February 14, 2022 interlocutory order. See id. 

We dismiss appellants’ interlocutory appeal for want of jurisdiction. 

Appellants’ motion to extend time to file their notice of appeal and appellee’s motion 

to strike the docketing statement are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Spain.
The Cascata Golf Course is located at 1 

Cascata Dr. in Boulder City, NV. 89005 

Golf course is designed on 451 acres of 

rolling hillside land.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF REGISTEREDINDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

Board of DirectorsSomantaPharmaceuticals, Inc. 

We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-139007) ofSomanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) of our report dated June 27, 2007,relating to the consolidated financial statements for the years ended April 30, 2007 and2006, and for the period from inception of operations (April 19, 2001) to April 30, 2007,which appear in this Form 10-KSB. 

We also hereby consent to theinclusion of our report dated June 27, 2007, relating to the consolidated financialstatements of the Company for the years ended April 30, 2007 and 2006, and for the periodfrom inception of operations (April 19, 2001) to April 30, 2007, which appear in this Form10-KSB in the prospectus supplement related to the Company’s Registration Statementon Form SB-2 (No. 333-132176). 

/s/ Stonefield Josephson,Inc. 

CERTIFIED PUBLICACCOUNTANTS 

Irvine, CaliforniaJune 27, 2007
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San A ntonio, Texas** 

November 20, 2019

No. 04

- 19

- 00672

- CR

IN RE John CERDA

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Ju stice

Liza Rodriguez, Justice

On October 16, 20 19 , this court issued an opinion d ismissing relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus for lack of jurisdictio n . On October 30 , 2019

, this court de nied relator ’ s motion for

rehearing

. On November 15, 2019, relator filed a “ Motion for Rehearing En Banc. ” Af ter

considering the arguments raised by relator , the motion is hereby DENIED. Relator ’ s request for

pub lication and oral argument is also DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on November 20, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

_________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court

1 This pro ceeding arises from a parole panel decision by the State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles.
co ..e Internal 

I ICI J3f111 •110. •009•,r.

—TOVSECREF-

*NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE

WASHINGTON. D.C.

THE NRO STAFF November 5, 1970

IRMINKIII3111

MEMORANDUM FOR DR. McLUCAS

SUBJECT: Briefing for Secretary Rogers

At the right is a new draft of youubriefing to

Secretary Rogers. This is significant) revised from

the previous draft.

You will recall that the briefing is scheduled for

Tuesday, November 17, from 3:00 to 4:30. You are scheduled

first, followed by Adm Gayler and then General Bennett.

Each speaker is allocated twenty minutes.

Your comments on the previous draft have been incorporated; however, we have left one blank where we are not

sure of the trade-off you were considering. We will

prepare the briefing in final form based upon your desires

and comments on the draft.

Included in the binder are selected photographs of

hardware. We will provide additional descriptions for

any you choose to use.

J-41'6

La.&

tergre.A. ri4Auto—t.• 1-;"ti JA41,

Ar tau .z moo , emovi".--e-, 'FREDERICK L. H

Major, USAF

kzest ta. to Atou – 2 ,„itA. •

•
REF ID:A65896 

.con • 

WILLIAM WEBSTER 

441 Stuart Street 

Boston 16, Massachusetts 

MaJor Gen. Ralph J. Canine, USA 

Director, Armed Forces Security Agemy 

Department of Defense 

Washington 25, D. c. 

My dear General Canine: 

May 27' 1952 

Thank you for your letter and the 

enclosed copy which I have read with great 

interest. I believe these moves are in the 

right direction an:i hope that the results 

may bear out th.is J.mpression. 

I have enjoyed my contact with this 

group an:i you may be certaJ.n that I shall 

continue to be much interested in the affairs 

and progress of the orgaru.zat:J.on. 

Please give my best regards to 

Joe Wenger. 

__ ,... 

Best personal regards. 

Sincerely, 

/s/Wm. Webster. 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

&,-~> ... ··-s·-.,.l Jt-.~--. \\-,..,R- -~~-A~"\'&"'-\'-------------------
• 

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 17 I 

Ground·Water Monitoring 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV­ STRIN­ ER IN 

REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE 

PART 264 - STANDARDS FOR OWNERS AND OPERATORS OF HAZARDOUS
 

WASTE TREATMENT. STORAGE. AND DISPOSAL FACILITIES WAC 173-303
 

SUBPART F - RELEASES FROM SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT UNITS 

APPLI CAB I LITV o 

t exerrptions 264.90Cb) 645(1)(b) x 

SUBPART K - SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS 

DOUBLE-LINED SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS: EXEMPTION FROM SUBPART F 

• 

section removed 

MONITORING AND INSPECTION 

oLd 264,226Cb)C3) 

removed; 264.226Cb)C4) 

redes ignated as 

264.226Cb)(3) 

264.222 

264.226Cb)(3) 

650(3) 

650(4)(b)( i i i) 

X 

X 

CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE 

oLd 264.228Cb)C2) 

removed; 264.228Cb)C3) 

and (4) redesignated 

as 264.228Cb)(2) and 

(3) 264.228(b)(2) 650(6)(bHi i) X 

section removed 264.228Cd) removed [650(6) Cd)] X 

SUBPART L - WASTE PILES 

DOUBLE'LINED PILES: EXEMPTION FROM SUBPART F 

section removed 264.252 removed [660(3)] X . 

INSPECTION OF LINERS: EXEMPTION FROM SUBPART F 

• 

section removed 264.253 removed [660(4)] X 

JUly 15~ 1985 - Page 13 of 25 
RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 17I: Ground-Water
 

Monitoring (conrd)
 

FEDERAL 

REQUIREMENT 

FEDERAL 

RCRA 

CITATION 

ANALOGOUS 

STATE 

CITATION 

STATE ANALOG IS: 

MORE 

EQUIV- STRINALENT GENT 

BROADERIN 

SCOPE 

MONITORING AND INSPECTION 

old264.254(b)(2) 

removed; 264.254(b)(3) 

.and (4) redesignated 

as264.254(b)(2) and 

(3) 264.254(b)(2) 660(5Xb)(ii) x 

SUBPART N-LANDFillS 

DOUBLE-lINED LANDFILLS: EXEMPTIONS FROM SUBPART F 

section removed 264.302 removed [665(3H X 

MONITORING AND INSPECTION 

remove old paragraph 

~64.303(b)(2); redesignate 264.303(b)(3) and· 

.(4)as264.303{b)(2) 

. and (3) 264.303(b)(2) 665(4)(b)(jj) X 0 

CLOSURE AND POST-CLOSURE CARE 

remove old paragraph 

264.310(b)(2); redesignate 264.310(b)(3), (4) 

and (5)as264.31 O(b) 

(2). (3) and (4) 264.310(bU2) 665f6Ub)(ii) . X 

subsection removed 264.310(c) removed[665(6)(cH X 

o
 

July 15, 1985 - Page 14of25 _
# CE2004088EN.01024701.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/247 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/247

---

(2004/C 88 E/0250)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0916/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(26 March 2004)

Subject:   Ireland and maritime safety legislation

Subject:

What reply if any has the Commission received from Ireland in response to the initiation of legal proceedings announced in July 2003 (press release IP/03/1116) regarding Ireland's failure to comply with Directive 2001/105/EC (1) on ship inspections and Directive 2001/106/EC (2) on port state control. What action has the Commission taken, or is proposing to take, with regard to this matter?

1

2

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(23 April 2004)

(23 April 2004)

In a letter dated 25 July 2003, Ireland sent the Commission the national measures (European Communities (Ship Inspection and Survey Organisations) Regulations 2003 – S.I. No 301) aimed at incorporating European Parliament and Council Directive 2001/105/EC of 19 December 2001 on ship inspections (3) into Irish law.

3

In a letter dated 1 July 2003, Ireland sent the Commission the national measures (European Communities Merchant Shipping (Port State Control) (Amendment) Regulations 2003 – S.I. No 243 of 2003) incorporating European Parliament and Council Directive 2001/106/EC of 19 December 2001 on Port State Control (3) into Irish law.

3

Consequently, on 15 October 2003, the Commission decided to terminate the infringement procedures initiated against Ireland for failure to communicate the national measures incorporating the abovemen-tioned directives into Irish law.

---

(1)  OJ L 19, 22.1.2002, p. 9.

1

(2)  OJ L 19, 22.1.2002, p. 17.

2

(3)  OJ L 19, 22.1.2002.

3

---
• enc i:Q= b97QlB 1 Urir tULI\ 1 1n-.. 

3 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT: 

Utilization of War Department Cryptosystems by State Department Abencies 

To: ASA Europe 

From: ASA Hdqs. 

BRIEF SUMMARY: 

CLASSIFICATION NUMBER: 

Department-State 

Date of Communication: 2 5 Oct 46 

Date of Basic Document: 7 0 ct 46 

Inquiry at the State Department, Washington indicate~ that Staim Department cryptographic systems are commonly held with the American Lagation, Dublin, Ireland, by the American Embassy, Paris, and the Office of the 

Political Advisor at B erlin and Frankfurt. 

It is requested that your office contact the Office of the Foreign Liquidation Commissioner, Faris and the Office of Military Government 

for Germany, Berlin, with the suggestion that messages from State 

Department Agencies for other State Dep~rtment Offices be cryptographed in State Department systems when such systems are available. 

Classifier: Mrs. Beyke 

Typist: Miss J otms 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

WDQAS form No, 1493 1 October 19'40 '4'4052 

~ 

-eW't'n~~ll 

Routed to:F'ile 

Date of Classifying: 22 Jun 48 

-

"# 

- .. ·-·-- -----

_)eclassified and approved for 

elease by NSA on 04-16-2014 

)LJrsuant to E .0. 13526