alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 25 1997

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

KENNETH N. POWELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 96-5204

(N. Dist. of Oklahoma)

(D.C. No. 91-CR-92E)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before SEYMOUR, Chief Judge, PORFILIO and MURPHY, Circuit Judges. 

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Kenneth N. Powell, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s denial of

his motion for recovery of currency and property brought pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.
-2-

P. 41(e). In his motion, Powell alleged that he was entitled to the return of

certain property forfeited through judicial forfeiture proceedings to the United

States pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 881(a). Powell contended that the Orders and

Judgments of Forfeiture forfeiting the currency and property to the United States

were invalid because he did not receive proper notice of the forfeiture

proceedings. The district court denied Powell’s motion, holding that the United

States’ attempted service of the complaint at both of Powell’s known residences,

as well as its attempted service on Powell’s attorney and constructive notice by

publication, were “‘reasonably calculated to give [Powell] actual notice of the

forfeiture proceedings.’” Dist. Ct. Order at 3 (quoting United States v. 51 Pieces

of Real Property, 17 F.3d 1306, 1317 (10th Cir. 1994)).

“Whether the government employed means reasonably calculated to provide

[Powell] actual notice is a question of fact which we review for clear error.” 51

Pieces of Real Property, 17 F.3d at 1316 (citation omitted). This court has

considered the district court order, the parties’ briefs and contentions, and the

entire record on appeal. Finding no clear error, we AFFIRM for substantially the

reasons set out in the district court’s Order dated August 8, 1996.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT,

Michael R. Murphy

Circuit Judge
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      11,243,943              39,683,712
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,914                 116,303
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,752                 535,915
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,054,957              40,509,679
<PP&E>                                         482,612               1,303,142
<DEPRECIATION>                                  98,756                 293,539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,461,613              41,605,003
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          861,050               2,646,533
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    463,354                 647,450
<COMMON>                                        51,169                  65,318
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,064,949              38,700,719
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,461,613              41,605,003
<SALES>                                        476,549                 954,650
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               476,549                 954,650
<CGS>                                          417,998                 844,330
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  417,998                 844,330
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,733,716              15,417,331
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              45,632                  73,334
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (6,610,684)            (15,000,492)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,610,684)            (15,000,492)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,610,684)            (15,002,492)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.32)                  (2.69)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.32)                  (2.69)


</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 18 

To prohibit authorized committees and leadership PACs from employing the 

spouse or immediate family members of any candidate or Federal office 

holder connected to the committee. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mr. VITTER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Rules and Administration 

A BILL 

To prohibit authorized committees and leadership PACs from 

employing the spouse or immediate family members of 

any candidate or Federal office holder connected to the 

committee. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF FAMILY 

4 MEMBERS OF A CANDIDATE OR FEDERAL OF5 FICE HOLDER BY CERTAIN POLITICAL COM6 MITTEES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Federal Election 

8 Campaign Act of 1971 (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.) is 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 18 IS

1 amended by inserting after section 324 the following new 

2 section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 325. PROHIBITION ON EMPLOYMENT OF FAMILY 

4 MEMBERS OF A CANDIDATE OR FEDERAL OF5 FICE HOLDER BY CERTAIN POLITICAL COM6 MITTEES. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be unlawful for any au8 thorized committee of a candidate or any other political 

9 committee established, maintained, or controlled by a can10 didate or a person who holds a Federal office to employ— 

11 ‘‘(1) the spouse of such candidate or Federal 

12 office holder; or 

13 ‘‘(2) any immediate family member of such can14 didate or Federal office holder. 

15 ‘‘(b) IMMEDIATE FAMILY MEMBER.—For purposes of 

16 subsection (a), the term ‘immediate family member’ means 

17 a son, daughter, stepson, stepdaughter, son-in-law, daugh18 ter-in-law, mother, father, stepmother, stepfather, mother19 in-law, father-in-law, brother, sister, stepbrother, or step20 sister of the Member.’’. 

21 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

22 this section shall take effect on the date of the enactment 

23 of this Act. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 18 IS

1 SEC. 2. SPOUSE LOBBYING MEMBER. 

2 Section 207(e) of title 18, United States Code, is 

3 amended by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(10) SPOUSES.—Any person who is the spouse 

5 of a Member of Congress and who was not serving 

6 as a registered lobbyist at least 1 year prior to the 

7 election of that Member of Congress to office and 

8 who, after the election of such Member, knowingly 

9 lobbies on behalf of a client for compensation any 

10 Member of Congress or is associated with any such 

11 lobbying activity by an employer of that spouse shall 

12 be punished as provided in section 216 of this 

13 title.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #14233 and #14234]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of California dated 02/23/2015. *Incident:*
                         Mission District Fire. *Incident Period:*
                         01/27/2015.
 DATES: *Effective Date:*
                         02/23/2015. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         04/24/2015. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         11/23/2015.
 ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally announced locations. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     San Francisco. *Contiguous Counties:*
                     California: Alameda; Marin; San Mateo. The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere
3.625Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere
1.813Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere
6.000Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625*For Economic Injury:*Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.625
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14233 5 and for economic injury is 14234 0. The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008) Dated: February 23, 2015. Maria Contreras-Sweet, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2015-04309 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      Item 23.1
                                                                                
                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT
                                        
We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement 
No. 333-51921 of Specialty Catalog Corp. on Form S-3 of our report dated 
March 8, 1999, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of 
Specialty Catalog Corp. for the year ended January 2, 1999.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 29, 1999
REF ID:A62830 

*9.jor General hank!. et.oner, USA, Rtd .. 

Varian AalOCiatea 

6ll !11.nsen Way 

Palo Al.to, Calitonda. 

Dear haM.s 

IO April 1955 

Here i• the l'ollov·up on 11',f .letter ot l AprU 1n OO?UlOC'tion 

vith the ar,yptoa)'•tea ;you Mnt • via Colonel Brown recently. Aa 

l indicated. we vould in 1lff letter, w aav. tblt thin; • ~ti;f 

tho;rougb ecru.tiny .. 

Untortunatel-1, the ay•tem 4eaigned b;r Mr. &aith doe• DOt 

aempli:ty any oqpta&rapbic pr.tnoiple• ~~know to ua, 

arid. it has certain aJor diaad.vutagea, ~ to wyatema in 

curreJlt \\le• Althoueh the ood>ination ot 'bu1c pr.Ui.cipl•• •hove 

a uen ~ taclle mind, am. a 1"lair tor ~phic mnip.il&tiou 

cm the~ or the ••s.ner, .... ral deterrent• to it• operatiorlal. tM.a!bil1~, tor our pit.U"pOM•, -_.'be aited.. '1w ixmorent req,uire-

•nt tbe.t e&eh eipber ••aa&e b9 twice the l.fm&th Qt the eol'Mlpond.~ 

1ua plain ~ i• an uneconoxl'loal t•turt1 tor large 'VOl\UDl!J traf'f'ic. ~ .t&at that a •Ulisle ~crepa:a.cy between the correct. cipbtr tat 

Ud ~ •r•1on rec•h•d .- attect the 1ntelltgib1ltt)' ot the re-

•1ndor of the -.sage •lao introduce•• b1lhl¥ un&t11nble factor. 

%t 11 recosnind that wch n'J'Or• 'ltlJ.Y be corrected ~il,y •nouah 

1n mm. operation ~ 1111ch a 9Y•teno hovever, in electro~Mcho.nie&l ud 

•1*Q'trl.'JU1C adaptationS I pl"eHnt CX'i Wria requint tbat &\ltol:atiO •Q.U1p.,. 

.-it be penaitt.ed ~operate umtt.ended, without the likelihood ~ 

UDFftd1etab]1' lOflS •tretches or \Ulintelligible plain WXt ruUlt1ng. 

I t•l a'Ul'9 that )'our lona baclqp-ow.id ot practical experience in 

•lectrical COlllrl.Ul1oation technolOQY will Hrve to corro'borate th4t 

4bllpbaaia w le1' upon the diMdvant.agea ot Mr. 1111 th'• Q"Stft tor 

extenaive ottioial telecomnsunicatione~ 

Xt 1• inter41•tb>a to note the tborouah anal.yl1•, b)' tho authora 

of t.he 'brochunt, cf the -potential WifikneeM• ot thi• 11#tbJ their 1~pemeutly cotWeb11d mthoda ~or avenitls theH veakneaaee :repre~ 

•nt • eonna~ble aohtevement. l: trwat ;you ViU ~··our 

appxieai.ation to )Ir, Saith, and to hi• utt0c1&te Mr· tavi.• 1 for their 

pi.t:riotio inwre•t. and expen4i1;ure ot t1- &nd •:ttort in thia •tter. 

At the JUll!l6nt l'. u rwcovering tram a minor heart attack buttlley put.• 1J1 ~ bo9pital ~rthe1-1•, wher9 I ha.ve alrle.~ been 

! ' I 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-18-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF ID:A62830 

~ _.,... t'IO weu.. Hovever,. t•a •kins .,ad -progreaa Nl4 lhould. be *'' or ~ la • coupl• ot bun4red 1fNU'• _ .. at i.n s.t vUl ... tn.t 

l®.i· 

' \ 

'\ \ 

\ \ 

' \ 

\ 

\I 

. \ 

\ }\ \i !. R I I \ ............. _ 

\ 

\
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 98-3623

___________ Foremost Insurance Group, * * Appellee, * * v. * * Randy Gene Lloyd; Randall Clay * Appeal from the United States Lloyd, a Minor, by and through his * District Court for the Natural Guardian, Randy Gene Lloyd, * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Defendants, * [UNPUBLISHED] * April Gardner, a Minor, by and through * her Natural Guardian, Billy Gardner; * Estate of Barbara Gardner, Deceased, * * Appellants. *

___________ Submitted: June 18, 1999 Filed: July 1, 1999

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. April Gardner (through her guardian) and the Estate of Barbara Gardner appeal from the entry of judgment for Foremost Insurance Group in its declaratory judgment1 The Honorable Elsijane T. Roy, United States District Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas.
-2- action against appellants and others. For reversal, appellants argue the district court 1 erred in concluding that the suit involved a sufficient amount in controversy to support federal diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
Upon de novo review, see General Elec. Capital Corp. v. Grossman , 991 F.2d 1376, 1380 (8th Cir. 1993), we agree with the district court that it does not appear to
a legal certainty that less than the jurisdictional amount was in controversy, see Missouri v. Western Sur. Co. , 51 F.3d 170, 173 (8th Cir. 1995).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Qr. c. J. ToapJrlna 

\tt\1ver•1't1 ot Callt'ornia 

a:dl41ng 3U 

REF ID:A65771 

S.05 Hilp:rd Avenue 

Loe Miele• ~, Cal.11'om.14 

Dear TtmDY• 

bDk JOU VffQ' 11'1,lCh tar 10UX' l.lfttcr of 19 •U· X 

can wll uuderstam r;tur reluctl:mce in •k'ng a MCOnd 

acro1s-the-continerit Junp betveen tba t.vo you now have 

ttehedul.e4 and therotoro I vUl. not p!'UB you to atterid 

'tbls Pit.ra91 Mt!ltiJ:lp OD. 20-21 »tq.. All • •tter Of tact, 

JOU aa an ol.4..tim!l' vill DOt lcee very nacb bf J'OlXt' inuill ty to attend at thi• Um& because we have~ nn-

==-r• cm the h.Ml.B 1.134. 'the ti:t1Jt met'-P6 1a na:t~ 

a..lgned to -. t4 mro 'benet'it to them. 

1"' l.1eu. at :fCMY: QQt attenc:U.nc. YO will probc.bly .end 

¥QU a ~ or the .-eth:is and will hope t.bat you can 

ooma the noxt ttee. 

With COl"41a1 grfft~, I ~ 

ec: Ml 

c/s 

8/ ASST (Mr. Friedntln) 

M/R: Acknowle6ging Dr. Tonpkin' a letter of 19 Apr 

and noting his inability to atteOO. Panel. meetill8B 

o:t 2Q-21 May is not e. natter ar great concern. 

l!\pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352f3
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Zuzana Reyes a/k/a Zuzana Hluskova

,

Appellant,

v.

Nelson Gonzales Reyes

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 9

- 00 0 8 9

- CV

Appeal from the

3 88 th District Court

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 201 4 DCM0466 )

O R D E R

On April 2 6, 2019, the Court suspended the appellate deadlines and ordered the trial court

to conduct a hearing to determine whether Appellant is unable to afford to pay costs on appeal.

The trial court conducted the hearing, and on May 14 , 2019, the court entered an order finding that

Appellant is able to afford to pay costs on appeal. Appellant has not filed a motion to challenge

the trial court’s order or an extension motion. See T EX .R.C IV .P. 145(g)(2). Therefore, Appellant

will not be allowed to proceed without payment of costs on appeal. The suspension of the appellate

deadlines is lifted. The record is due J uly 11 , 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 11 th day of June , 20 1 9

.

PER CURIAM

B efore McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Zimbabwe

On March 6, 2003, by Executive Order 13288, the President declared a national emergency and blocked the property of certain persons, pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706), to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States constituted by the actions and policies of certain members of the Government of Zimbabwe and other persons to undermine Zimbabwe's democratic processes or institutions. These actions and policies had contributed to the deliberate breakdown in the rule of law in Zimbabwe, to politically motivated violence and intimidation in that country, and to political and economic instability in the southern African region.

On November 22, 2005, the President issued Executive Order 13391 to take additional steps with respect to the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13288 by ordering the blocking of the property of certain persons who undermine democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe.

On July 25, 2008, the President issued Executive Order 13469, which expanded the scope of the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13288 and authorized the blocking of the property of certain persons determined to have engaged in actions or policies to undermine democratic processes or institutions in Zimbabwe, to commit acts of violence and other human rights abuses against political opponents, and to engage in public corruption.

The actions and policies of these persons continue to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared on March 6, 2003, and the measures adopted on that date, on November 22, 2005, and on July 25, 2008, to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond March 6, 2015. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13288.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2015-05338

Billing code 3295-F5
Form of Stancorp Financial Group, Inc. 2002 Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 STANCORP FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 
 2002 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 NON-STATUTORY STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT 
 THIS AGREEMENT
is made between StanCorp Financial Group, Inc., an Oregon corporation (the “Company”), and [                    ] (the
“Optionee”), pursuant to the Company’s 2002 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). The Company and the Optionee agree as follows: 
  

	1.	The Company hereby grants to the Optionee on the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the right and option (the “Option”) to purchase all or any part of
[            ] shares (the “Shares”) of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of
$[            ] per share. The Option is not intended to be an incentive stock option, as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and therefore
is a Non-Statutory Stock Option. 

  

	2.	The terms and conditions of the Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto, are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement. 

  

	3.	The Grant Date for this Option is [                    ]. Until this
Option expires or is earlier terminated as provided in the Plan, the Option may be exercised from time to time to purchase shares as to which it has become exercisable. This Option shall become exercisable in four equal installments on the first
four anniversaries of the Grant Date. 

  

	4.	Unless earlier terminated as provided in the Plan, this Option shall continue in effect for ten (10) years from the Grant Date, and therefore shall expire if not exercised on
or before [                    ]. 

  

	5.	The Option may not be assigned or transferred by the Optionee, either voluntarily or by operation of law, except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution of the state or
country of the Optionee’s domicile at the time of death. 

  

	6.	No rights or privileges of a stockholder in the Company are conferred by reason of the granting of this Option. Optionee will not become a stockholder in the Company with respect to
the Shares unless and until the Option has been properly exercised and the option price fully paid with respect to the portion of the Option exercised. 

  

	7.	This Agreement, together with the Plan, constitutes the complete and entire agreement concerning this Option between the parties. 

  

			
	  	 	 Grant Type:                    

		 	








 The parties have executed this Agreement in duplicate as of the Grant Date. 
  

			
	STANCORP FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
		
	By:	 	  


 ===========================================================================================

 ACCEPTANCE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT 
  

					
	 Dated:
	 	  
	  	  

		 		  	Home address
		
	  
	  	  

	 Optionee’s signature
	  	City, State, Zip
		
	  
	  	
	 Print name
	  	

 Please return one signed original to Human Resources P2B, no later than
[                    ].
REF rn.:;Xiz..l7.2AA ./ ~ \;..' (>..~("'.."' .-;..~~":..~-) :t 19 t-\? s <"'-"'· ' ''"' '--

~":,I:::.\.~ ........ ""=--~~~\.~ "( ~~--.(~~-) 

c..-....~SC-\ (."'-~t...,,'='"i<.""-'~ ~~. (~) 

~ s ~ \. ~ ( ~.V-."'""""- \ 

(_~~::.f\~ (~·~) 

~~\~ ... ~~ (~-.N. ~J.~ ~~~ c---~~) 

~. \,&_~ .__\ ~, "'-'--"\- ~ -("~~ ~~(~~~~ 

~':.~~{"'\~ ~·-~1 ~~.) 

~- . . . . tP~