alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       6,563,571
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,181,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            10,606,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 15,995,188
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       1,269,775
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    108,660,132
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,861,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             150,989,481
<DEPOSITS>                                 133,139,007
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,500,298
<LONG-TERM>                                  3,314,822
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       399,500
<OTHER-SE>                                  12,635,854
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             150,989,481
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              2,939,846
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              418,807
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                34,637
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             3,393,290
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           1,453,482
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,518,289
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        1,875,001
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   54,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,465,360
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                761,881
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     761,881
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   534,033
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    1.337
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    1.337
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                    254,736
<LOANS-PAST>                                    66,009
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                42,741
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,821,680
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   49,811
<RECOVERIES>                                    35,807
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,861,676
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,861,676
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1760

KIM L. ALLEN-PLOWDEN, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

NATIONAL HEALTHCARE OF SUMTER; CAROL BROWN, 

 Defendants - Appellees, 

 and 

BRENDA FLANAGAN; JEANIE S. CROTTS, 

 Defendants. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief 

District Judge. (3:07-cv-00420-JFA) 

Submitted: December 11, 2008 Decided: December 15, 2008 

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Kim L. Allen-Plowden, Appellant Pro Se. Jeffrey Andrew Lehrer, 

FORD & HARRISON, LLP, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Kim L. Allen-Plowden appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer and 

dismissing her complaint alleging employment discrimination and 

defamation. This court reviews a district court’s order 

granting summary judgment de novo, drawing reasonable inferences 

in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. Doe v. 

Kidd, 501 F.3d 348, 353 (4th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. 

Ct. 1483 (2008). Summary judgment is proper “if the pleadings, 

the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any 

affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any 

material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a 

matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(c); see Celotex Corp. v. 

Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). We have reviewed the record 

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Allen-Plowden v. Nat’l 

Healthcare of Sumter, No. 3:07-cv-00420-JFA (D.S.C. June 4, 

2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATON PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Hibshman Optical Corp. on Form 10-KSB
for the year ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof ( the "report"), Carmine Catizone, Treasurer of
the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




                                       /s/ CARMINE CATIZONE
                                       -----------------------------
                                       Carmine Catizone
                                       Treasurer
                                       (Principal Executive Officer)
REF 

Mr. J. l)uch 

Bead, lU.ectronic I>i:ri.siea 

.W&tiooa.l Cub llegi.ter Collpt.n;y 

Main and :t streets 

lllt.Jtoa. 9, Olio 

Deed' Mr. Dachs 

With 1.ti'e:rencEt to the rda•1oa or tbe SubcQlllldttee 

cu Geueml l'urpose J'lex1'ble Am.11'tical ~1pmtirt, t.be 

a.ate ot Mq' 4-7, 1954, 1-cluaiY&, bu 'been prq.,oae4 tor 

the tn1t1al. :reviev ct the prablem eoatraatb:lg the coamd.ttee. 

Tbe _.tbg VUl 'be held at the lfaticaal &ecur1t7 Apacy .. 

Vartoua •lben or tm A&eMT are ccatributS.. ccaataerable ettort t.o -.kilJS a dot.ailed preae11tat1w or eeTI:nil 

p:rdbler-:<S pertirent to the work ot the c:Ollaltittee ad. 1t ta 

hoped tmt )'OU can e.narie;e to be preffnt Car tbc entire initia.l 

eollf"er'6;;ce • 

WiU you. pl.eve ad.v!ee 1--'.:r,. W11llu1 F. Frk&aui, Bxeer:.tlve 

Seeretuy ot the Ba.t.io.l. ~11;,y J,.er;cy BcieJltif'ic .A4visar:y 

Boal:'dJ whether yc>u rill bo @le to o.ttend in or4er that be ~ 

:ta:ne tira"V"'91 ~rst' 

JOU c. McPHmSOR 

Cha:ln:a!l er t1lfl &iibc~l"cl t~e 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

.....
1

NUMBER 13-18-00566-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ANGEL GODINEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 28th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

O R D E R

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

Appellant, Angel Godinez, has filed a notice of appeal with this Court from his 

conviction in trial court cause number CR07000169-A. The trial court’s certification of 

the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the defendant does not have the right to 

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 

provide that an appeal must be dismissed if a certification showing that a defendant has 

a right of appeal is not made a part of the record. Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 

44.4. The purpose of the certification requirement is to efficiently sort appealable cases 
2

from non-appealable cases so that appealable cases can “move through the system 

unhindered while eliminating, at an early stage, the time and expense associated with 

non-appealable cases.” Greenwell v. Ct. of Apps. for the Thirteenth Jud. Dist., 159 

S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see Hargesheimer v. State, 182 S.W.3d 906, 

912 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Within thirty days of date of this notice, appellant’s lead appellate counsel, Hon. 

Tanya Garza, is hereby ORDERED to: 1) review the record; 2) determine whether 

appellant has a right to appeal; and 3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings 

as to whether appellant has a right to appeal and/or advise this Court as to the 

existence of any amended certification. If appellant’s counsel determines that appellant 

has a right to appeal, counsel is further ORDERED to file a motion with this Court within 

thirty days of this notice, identifying and explaining substantive reasons why appellant 

has a right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 

614–15 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); see also, e.g., Carroll v. State, 119 S.W.3d 838, 841 

(Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.) (certification form provided in appendix to 

appellate rules may be modified to reflect that defendant has right of appeal under 

circumstances not addressed by the form). The motion must include an analysis of the 

applicable case law, and any factual allegations therein must be true and supported by 

the record. See Dears, 154 S.W.3d at 614–15; cf. Woods v. State, 108 S.W.3d 314, 

316 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (construing former appellate rule 25.2(b)(3) and holding that 

recitations in the notice of appeal must be true and supported by the record). Copies of 

record documents necessary to evaluate the alleged error in the certification affecting 

appellant’s right to appeal shall be attached to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1,

10.2.
3

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the 11th day of October 2018.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7167

JAMES E. HARRISON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus C. T. NULTY, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-97-575-AM) Submitted: August 13, 1998 Decided: August 28, 1998 Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James E. Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: James E. Harrison seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.§ 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofappealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Harrison v. Nulty , No. CA-97-575-AM (E.D. Va. July 29, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

 

 

CERTIFICATION

I, Thomas N. Hendrickson, Chief Executive Officer of CPAC, Inc., certify that:

1.
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CPAC, Inc.;

2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)
[Reserved]  [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8392 and 34-49313.]

c)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; and

d)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 14, 2005
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 12.1


                    BLUE BIRD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                    BLUE BIRD BODY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

            STATEMENTS RE COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
  FOR THE YEARS ENDED NOVEMBER 1, 1997, NOVEMBER 2, 1996, OCTOBER 28, 1995,
                    OCTOBER 29, 1994 AND OCTOBER 30, 1993.
                         (In Thousands Except Ratios)


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                       BBC
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       NOVEMBER 1,   NOVEMBER 2,   OCTOBER 28,   OCTOBER 29,   OCTOBER 30,
                                          1997          1996          1995          1994          1993
                                       -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------   -----------
<S>                                    <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>

FIXED CHARGES:
 Interest expense......................  $ 32,488      $ 16,455      $ 16,282      $ 15,224      $ 15,973
 Interest element of rentals...........       539           473           536           521           448
 Amortization of debt issuance costs...     1,266         2,688         2,245         2,209         2,202
                                        ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
                                         $ 34,293      $ 19,616      $ 19,063      $ 17,954      $ 18,623
                                        ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
                                        ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------

EARNINGS:
 Net income (loss).....................  $ 10,597      $ 23,765      $ 16,852      $ 15,408      $  9,595
 Provision (benefit) for income taxes..    (4,473)       14,034        11,686        10,157         6,930
 Fixed charges.........................    34,293        19,616        19,063        17,954        18,623
 Interest capitalized..................       -0-           -0-          (208)         (145)          -0-
                                        ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
                                          $40,417       $57,415       $47,393       $43,374       $35,148
                                        ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
                                        ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------

RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES.....      1.2x          2.9x          2.5x          2.4x          1.9x
                                        ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------
                                        ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------     ---------

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Advanced Neuromodulation
Systems, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, F. Robert Merrill III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to the best of my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the
Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate,
effective as of August 9, 2004. /s/ F. Robert Merrill IIIName: F. Robert Merrill III
Title: Chief Financial Officer
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      State of
                                       Percentage  Incorporation
                                          of            or
    Parent           Subsidiary        Ownership    Organization
    ------           ----------        ----------   ------------
<S>                  <C>               <C>          <C>
Mid-Iowa Financial   Mid-Iowa Savings       100%       Federal
 Corp.              Bank, FSB

Mid-Iowa Financial   Mid-Iowa Security      100%         Iowa   
 Corp.                Corporation

Mid-Iowa Savings     Center of Iowa         100%         Iowa
 Bank, FSB              Investments, Limited

</TABLE>