alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                                                                      ----------

                          TOMMY HILFIGER CORPORATION
                 COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER ORDINARY SHARE
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                           Year Ended                Year Ended                 Year Ended
                                                            March 31,                 March 31,                  March 31,
                                                               2001                      2000                       1999
                                                           --------------          -----------------          -----------------
<S>                                                        <C>                     <C>                        <C>
FINANCIAL STATEMENT PRESENTATION
BASIC

Weighted average shares outstanding....................            91,239                     94,662                     92,264
                                                           ==============          =================          =================

Net income.............................................      $    130,961            $       172,358            $       173,717
                                                           ==============          =================          =================

Per share amount.......................................      $       1.44            $          1.82            $          1.88
                                                           ==============          =================          =================

DILUTED

Weighted average shares outstanding....................            91,239                     94,662                     92,264

Net effect of dilutive stock options based on the
    treasury stock method using average market price...               295                        970                      1,112
                                                           --------------          -----------------          -----------------

Total..................................................            91,534                     95,632                     93,376
                                                           ==============          =================          =================

Net Income.............................................      $    130,961            $       172,358            $       173,717
                                                           ==============          =================          =================

Per Share Amount.......................................      $       1.43            $          1.80            $          1.86
                                                           ==============          =================          =================
</TABLE>
# C_2005082EN.01000602.xml

| 2.4.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.4.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/6

---

Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order brought on 28 January 2005 by the Republic of Kazakhistan Statistics Agency against the Commission of the European Communities

(Case C-3/05 SA)

(2005/C 82/13)

An application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 28 January 2005 by the Republic of Kazakhistan Statistics Agency, represented by R. Nathan, avocat.

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | lift the Commission's immunity so that the funds which it holds in favour of the judgment debtor, in this case CESD – Communautaire a.s.b.l., may be garnisheed, there being no argument either in law or fact that the Commission, as garnishee, does not validly discharge its liability for the funds which it holds provisionally to the judgment debtor's order by paying them to the judgment creditor; |
| --- | --- |

—

lift the Commission's immunity so that the funds which it holds in favour of the judgment debtor, in this case CESD – Communautaire a.s.b.l., may be garnisheed, there being no argument either in law or fact that the Commission, as garnishee, does not validly discharge its liability for the funds which it holds provisionally to the judgment debtor's order by paying them to the judgment creditor;

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           39778
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                122200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     626065
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           50005
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             50146
<LOANS>                                         611578
<ALLOWANCE>                                      14962
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1487351
<DEPOSITS>                                     1283286
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              26460
<LONG-TERM>                                      38712
<COMMON>                                         52967
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       85926
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1487351
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  46921
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                34161
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 81082
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               34226
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               35922
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            45160
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     1000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  20905
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  28155
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       18550
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (488)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     18062
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.54
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.57
<LOANS-NON>                                       8712
<LOANS-PAST>                                      2541
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 22481
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 16209
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     4207
<RECOVERIES>                                      1960
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                14962
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             14962
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH B. COX,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 593 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of April, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
7. 

.. 

, .. 

·. 

·F· ID:A700·48 

.· 

I APR .1952 

: ... 

,.Dear captain HarrillOlla 

)br tudimsa in r~ to 7our letter of ll March is to be 

attributed to the faet that. 0111" perwl people vera unable t.o •~ah telephone coataot td.t.h the 11&11 about, 1fhGI ~u wrote ma •. r.inallT, the7 got ill touch vi.th hill tJ1rcn1gh a broth• or bis~ 1lbo .. 

ia • lacal ptv&ician and proper toiw to be completal by the JOUD&. 

MD ave been Milt .tdm. He ·appe.ara to ha.Ye good qualit1cat.ioaa 

tcw a posit.ion ill ou organisatim ·Gd I. &8IRIZ'9 7ou that. aost, carehl. oonaJd ... uon v.1U be gt.Ten hi• appJJ.catica. 

BeciprocatiDg ~v .kind ng&Na~ I •• 

. . 

.. 

. M~o for Record: 

•• I ' 

: ~ . .. 

. ... 

·. 

. Sizlc•rel.7 • 

W.F.Friedman/eb;y/2 April 52 

AFSA-OOT/Rm.1923 2B/Ex.t. 6o493 

This is in reply. to Capt. H~son• s personal°. quiry 

to Mr. Fried.man. · 

1

... . . . _ .· · .. · -... ·.l!\oQroved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 purs.uantto E.O. 1352a 

:c . . .. . ·.. ' . . . .· ,, . . . ' 

.() 
.. . .. = • .. .I' REF ID:A70048 

.. -~-·~ 

~I DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

BUREAU OF SHIPS 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

Colonel William F. Friedman, IBA 

A.F.s • .1.. 

• 3801 Nebraska Avenue, N.w. 

Washington, D. c. 

Dear Colonel Friedman: 

IN REPl.Y REP'l!R TO 

Code 744 

11 March 19.5'2 

One of my senior engineers advised me a £ew days ago regarding the 

£orthcomi.ng discharge 0£ his son-in-law from the Marine Corps 

Reserve, the man in question being a 22-year old Sergeant, whose 

experience is as outlined in the attached letter o£ S March addressed 

to me. 

In view 0£ this man's highly specialized training and ;rears 0£ 

experience, plus the £act that he has undoubtedly been able to 

satisfy the high standards required by the Marine Corps, I think he 

would probably- make a useful recruit for you if you have a vacancy 

in the categories in which he has specialized experience. 

\ 

I£ the matter is o£ irrterest to you, I would appreciate it if you 

would deal with it through your nonn.al channels, and if, in 

addition, you would let me know what your d~.J.s, this also 

would be much appreciated. .---

Best regards. 

Encl:(l) 
1:~~l: i.':1:1" : II )11):: '/::~\' l/(())(0)/q[;j ------

• • h ft -- ---~-~ -----~-----.::,,------------

p L· s= ~ ~ tJ ~ -~e--{\~~ 

~Ah-:N-l ~ d~·U· S ~J rtlL .. 

+~"1 • '% fh,.£.f L<.-~- ~ k_ 

~,., ~ . ~ rrv ""'"~~ 

~ ~~ 411"cle.. o.. ~ 

~~
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 21
                              PRESIDENT CASINOS, INC.
                             SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES



                                                    State or Jurisdiction
           Name                               of Incorporation or Organization

The Connelly Group, L.P.                                  Delaware

President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc.                 Missouri

The President Riverboat Casino-Mississippi, Inc.          Mississippi

President Riverboat Casino-Iowa, Inc.                     Iowa

TCG/Blackhawk, Inc.                                       Iowa

PRC Holdings Corporation                                  Delaware

PRC Management, Inc.                                      Pennsylvania

President Riverboat Casino-Philadelphia, Inc.             Pennsylvania

PRC Louisiana, Inc.                                       Louisiana

President Riverboat Casino-New York, Inc.                 Delaware

Broadwater Hotel, Inc.                                    Mississippi

President Broadwater Hotel, LLC                           Mississippi

Vegas Vegas, Inc.                                         Mississippi

President Casino New Yorker, Inc.                         New York
President Reagan greets former NSA Deputy Director Robert E. Rich, Mrs. Rich 

and the Rich family, and others including LTG William Odom, Director NSA. In 

this ceremony, the President is presenting Mr. Rich with the National Security 

Medal. The award citation is read noting Mr. Rich’s exemplary performance as 

Deputy Director NSA and his distinguished cryptologic career spanning 36 years 

at NSA. 

Mr. Rich, through his unique leadership and management skills and unblemished 

personal integrity, is recognized as one of the key individuals instrumental in 

shaping the national cryptologic effort into the dynamic and sophisticated system 

it has become today. His personal efforts in structuring the information base 

available to national decision makers in dealing with the Achille Lauro, KAL007, 

TWA flight 840 and Libyan terrorism incidents are testimony to his significant 

contributions. Mr. Rich’s superior achievements, which are recognized at all 

levels of government, deserve the highest recognition of both meritorious service 

to this nation and merit the award of the National Security Medal. 

As he pins the medal on Mr. Rich’s chest, the President congratulates Mr. Rich, 

thanks him for his service to the country and wishes him the best. Mr. Rich 

thanks the President and says he hopes we can keep that going to which the 

President replies that he is sure he will. The President presents Mr. Rich with the 

citation binder and thanks him again. Mr. Rich notes what a great pleasure it has 

been and an honor for the entire Agency. The President suggests a family photo 

and expresses his appreciation a final time.
# CE2004084EN.01094401.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/944 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/944

---

(2004/C 84 E/1042)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1087/04

by Kyösti Virrankoski (ELDR) to the Commission

(5 April 2004)

Subject:   Uncertainties regarding Finland's Natura 2000 network

Subject:

The Finnish Government has on several occasions forwarded material to the Commission concerning the Natura 2000 network which is to be established. Most recently the government took a decision on this on 22 January 2004. In its decision of that date it stated that Finland's Natura 2000 network comprised 1 806 areas.

According to information provided by the Commission last year, however, Finland's Natura 2000 network was to comprise 1832 areas. Moreover, again according to the Commission, their combined surface area was 1 239 000 hectares greater than decided by the Finnish Government.

According to the information currently available to the Commission, how many Natura 2000 network areas are there in Finland and what is their combined area?

How is it possible that the Commission's information does not correspond to the decisions of the Finnish Government?

What will the Commission do to bring its data into line with the decisions of the Finnish Government?

If the Commission adopts Finland's Natura 2000 network on the basis of contradictory material, will the legally binding decision comprise those areas designated by the Commission in its decision or those areas which the Finnish Government has proposed?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(28 April 2004)

(28 April 2004)

The Commission is investigating the differences identified with the Finnish authorities and undertakes to ensure that there are no discrepancies prior to the formal Commission decision on the Natura 2000 list for the Boreal region, which is programmed for later in 2004.

In relation to the discrepancies, these may arise from corrections in the data bases and consolidation of some overlaps by the Finnish authorities which have yet to be fully incorporated within the Commission figures.

The Commission will, after verification with the Finnish authorities, inform the Parliament of the latest updated and agreed figures.

---
·('·~ . ....... .• ..... 'lo ~ .,6 • 

REF ID:A63922 

- ... -

DMr Hr. Pri•dmo.nt 

I quote below the tex'ti ot a ...,rap&1m >:ele.ti:ca to four 

inqutry ot December I, v1th reapef:t to a torthcom1ng plibllea .. Uou. on the 11al"tt.ma cont1H·•ooea. fJ.'htl mouree of the inf'onnat1.on 

11 Mr- Q. Benlar4 ~ble, Chief ot 'the lliatoric:al DiTUion, 

Depuitment of' State& 

"l. i\te text ot the ••eagea (there vere three, I 

beltno) 1A 1ncluded in the wlumct• on the Potsdam Conr.rence. 

111. 1'he text 1• quoted trom th9 publi•hed. prooeedinaa 

ot the '.rolr,yo War CrU.1 T.ri.al1, ao ti. eter1al i• in print ~. 

rt,a. 1'bere i• a tootnoto which •ta.te• that the text. at 

tb'loe ••&ep• ~ 'known to' US official• on July 13. 

04. 'llwl.·• i• a hrther toot.not. reference to the 

,ubltahed 1;n-eatal RJ,arie• in which the prooe11 ot obtainifJI the • ri&i La cle&rl.1 1.d.entitiea. 

•5. 'lbe text turtb.er quote• Secx.tar,y Btiuon vrJ.t~ 

that he received tram the Pent440a an '1AtAreati:oc ••~ 

on JW.y 16 .. 

"6. b phraaln& ot tbct toot.note uent.1oued in 3 abOVe 

i1 as agreed "1th tlw :ttonte.gon t.o ~lace a more s.plicit 

..i..te.nt. on the plle;y ... proota .ubm1tte4 to Def•ruse. 11 

)b:o. WiUie.ra F .. hi~ 

lpecial. Aa•1•tant 

ktional Security Apney 

Vuhi»aton 

8inclf~l.y ~; 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
Exhibit 32.2 Certification
by Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant to 
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection
with the quarterly report of Data I/O Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Joel S. Hatlen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, that pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1)


The Report
 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
 Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)


The
 information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Joel S. HatlenJoel S.
 HatlenChief
 Financial Officer(Principal
 Financial Officer)May 14, 2008 27
REF ID:A66591 

llr. John YOn .1fcum.nn 

The lmtitute 'tar Ad:vanced study 

Priaceton UnivenitJPl'inceton, Bev JerDO¥ 

llear Dr. von JfeUIJaJUl t 

8er1al t (p I 4Cf 

1 5 DEC 1953 

At the lut •ating ct the •ttonaJ. Security Aprq Sclentitic 

Mvisary Icard, it vaa agreed to eatabl1ah tb:ree pmele devoted 

m,peet1'ft)¥ to the field.a at im.thene.t1ce1 telocoraram1cat1oJl81 &D1 

eleatronics. It 1e tho 11ltent1cm ot tbe Daar4 to ltatt these paMlAI 

with eminent •cienti.8ta who can be called vpon tor spec1.al eervil:e 

ur conaultaticm iii m.tters at importanco to tbia Aq:ncy. It 1a pro• 

pODed that torml -.thi.G;s ot the panela 'be very inf'requent and tba.t, 

U a pnenJ. ruJ.e I pa.Del J!l!Jlibe%'8 'bo called \WOll tQ Ml'V8 ~ U their 

ocmvonience per:dte and on an imiv14ual consultant b;.aie. Vbon the 

pmols us opcr-'1titJ£ u IN.Cb, they vill work throuah their cbe.irmon, 

*<> vill report to the Joard.. 

It ia zv ~ th:it )"OU haw expresacd vll11npeaa to 

nrvo OD tim Mat,,'le-.tice Panol, in addition to 70\lt" current eer-nce 

u & 11116Aibel· ot the Board :ltaelf'. ~ ~ ot th11 Panill 1a Dr. 

Jt. P .. Robertson, eal.1.ta.nrla Xnatituta ot 'l.'eobnoJ.oc;;y1 Pu114en-"' 1 

Call.torniaJ &D5. he v11l be vrltt»a 70'1 soon to Mk fOU t.o aonf'h-nl 

r:iur villifC!lMB to nrve 01\ hie pi.nel and to notity JOt.1 ot the date 

wb*11 tbe Jane 1 rlAY have 1ta tirat i'W.1 Slet11'S. 

I riab to_,,,..,, IO' 4Hp -wrac!ation tor )'OUl' aotiw izrtereat 

la our l'S"dblema and te# JCUr valued aontr1buti01l8 to thth' 1olution. 

·~17, 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

------ ---~-~~~-~
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC

Friends ofEast Hampton Airport, Inc. 

### etal., Complainant,

v. 

### FAA Docket No. 16-15-02 Town ofEast Hampton, NY Respondent.

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federal AviationAdministration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practicefor Federally AssistedAirportEnforcement Proceedings, 14 CFR Part 16 (Rules ofPractice). Pursuantto the Rules ofPractice, Section 16.ll(a), the date by whichthe Director's Determination will be issued 

### in this matter is hereby extended to January 11, 2017. An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

Kevin . Willis, Director Offic ofAirport Compliance

and Management AnalysisCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on December 12, 2016, I caused to be placed in the United States mail (first class mail, postage paid), a true copy ofthe Notice ofExtension of Time for FAA Docket 16-15-02 addressed to: Complainant Leonard D. Kirsch Shelley A. Ewalt McBreen & Kopko 500 N. Broadway, Suite 129 Jericho, NY 11753 lkirscMilmklawnyc.corn sewalt(wmklavmyc.corn Counsel for Respondent Elizabeth Vail Town Attorney Town ofEast Hampton !59 Pantigo Road East Hampton, NY !1937 EVail:2i)EHamptonNY.Gov W. Eric Pilsk Catherine van Heuven Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP 1001 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 epilsk@kaplankirsch.com cvanheuven!iz)kaplankirsch.com Copy to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket FAA Airport Compliance Division (ACO-l00) FAAEastern Regional Office (AEA-600) J

. I

laudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis