alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     MEDIQ INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         2,939
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  42,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                   2,809
<INVENTORY>                                    11,328
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               62,567
<PP&E>                                         238,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                 121,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 276,763
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          43,924
<BONDS>                                        147,968
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    3,337
<COMMON>                                       20,039
<OTHER-SE>                                     29,707
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   276,763
<SALES>                                        9,459
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               68,590
<CGS>                                          7,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  53,568
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             11,922
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,310
<INCOME-TAX>                                   6,444
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,134)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 37,175
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,926)
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   29,115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  1.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  1.14
        

</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2077 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability to request 

consumer reports in certain cases to establish and enforce child support 

payments and awards. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Credit Reporting Act to clarify the ability 

to request consumer reports in certain cases to establish 

and enforce child support payments and awards. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Child Support Assist5 ance Act of 2015’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2077 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUESTS FOR CONSUMER REPORTS BY STATE OR 

2 LOCAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT 

3 AGENCIES. 

4 Section 604(a)(4) of the Fair Credit Reporting Act 

5 (15 U.S.C. 1681b(a)(4)) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or deter7 mining the appropriate level of such payments’’ and 

8 inserting ‘‘, determining the appropriate level of 

9 such payments, or enforcing a child support order, 

10 award, agreement, or judgment’’; 

11 (2) in subparagraph (B)— 

12 (A) by striking ‘‘paternity’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘parentage’’; and 

14 (B) by adding ‘‘and’’ at the end; 

15 (3) by striking subparagraph (C); and 

16 (4) by redesignating subparagraph (D) as sub17 paragraph (C). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8121

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. MAURICE GREGORY, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00163-2; 2:08-cv-00393-REP)

Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Maurice Gregory, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.PER CURIAM: Maurice Gregory seeks to appeal the district court’s order treating his self-styled Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion as a successive and unauthorized 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2008) motion and dismissing it on that basis. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006); Reid v. Angelone , 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El

v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Gregory has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

23 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
e. 

Dear Bill: 

HARVEY 1l\ORTON ARONSON 

ATTORWF.Y AT LAW 

LAW AND PINANCE BUILDING 

PITTSBlJRGH, PA. 

June 20th 1944. 

The letter you addressed to Stewart 

Dunn was read at the 35th R9 -union of the 

Central High 109 Olaes. All of us were glad 

to bear from you, but sorry to learn you have 

been under such a physical strain. Here's 

hoping you will be batting normal soon. I can 

appreciate the heavy burdens now placed upon 

your shoulders. 

I just wanted to let you know that 

we missed you, and to say "Sello. 0 If you ever 

come to Pittsburgh I would appreciate your phoning me and I want you to feel free to make 

yourself comfortable at my home. 

With regards, I am 

HMA:AS 

Mr. William F. Friedman, 

Director of Communications Research, 

Headquarters, Army Service Forces, 

Office of the Chief Signal Officer, 

Washington, D. o. 

pproved for Release by NSA on 03-27-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

13526
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TVI Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harley A. Hughes, Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Dated: May 8, 2007 |  | /s/ Harley A. Hughes                 
|                   |  | Harley A. Hughes                     
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
' -

USCIB: 5.4/23 

7 lfia.rch 1955 

~1EMOR1JIDPM FOR THE MEMBER§ OF USGIB: 

Subject: 

Reference: 

Semi-Annual Report of the Executive Secretary, USCIB. 

(a) USOIB 5.4/20 of 10 February 1955. 

(b) USCIB 5.4/19 of 11 January 1955. 

:. It is requested that the enclosed page as ameaded by reference 

(a) be inserted in reference (b) and t.~e superseded page be destroyed. 

2. This document may be downgraded to UNCLASSIFIED when the 

enclosure is detached. 

Enclosure 

a/s. 

USCIB: 5.1../23 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

'f'OP SECRET 

24 
.. I I 111111 

• r~~11 • 

II. FUNCTIONS AND DUTIES. 

A. NARRATIVE. 

1. No changes in the routine duties being performed by the 

Secretariat have occurred since the last report. 

2. No further progress has been made on the project of codification of USCIB directives, policies and decisions. While some ground was 

gained in consoliaation of directives, ground was lost in the card indexing 

of USCIP decisions. This was due to the press of current business brought 

on by the Petersen Case, the CHICOM problem. and the MUSCO affair which 

resulted in building up new material without a commensurate increase in 

carding of the old. 

3. No further progress has been made on the project to consolidate 

and issue in one document USCIB directives and policy statements with regard 

to the security of COMINT. However, 'it is expected that progress will resume in the near future. 

4. Full implementation of the new Appendix 11B11 went into effect 

on 1 January 1955. The effect of this action is not yet discernible. 

A complete set of new code words was introduced concurrently with categorization. 

5. The security of electrical transmissions of COMINT is still 

not satisfactory. It is considered that it is too soon to tell what 

beneficial effect, if any, has resulteQ. from CIBD #9, and the report by the 

Director, NSA, contained as an enclosure with USCIB 13.5/81, dated 

3 September 1954. 

6. The Petersen Case occupied much of the time and effort of the 

Executive Secretariat throughout the latter half of the period of this 

report. A dossier on this case is on file in the office of the Executive 

Secretary. The lessons to be learned from it will be studied and presented 

for consideration at a later date. 

B. CO}IJ!ENTS. 

1. Members are again reminded of the requirement to file copies 

of their new security regulations with the office of the Executive Secretary. 

Only two members have done this so far. 

2. With the advent of categorization each member should make a 

diligent effort to divide and compartment his organization so as to allow 

for only the absolutely necessary minimum of Category III clearances. If 

effective cornpartrnentation cai1 be achieved, control of darn.age resulting from 

compromises can be enhanced materially. 

(Amended 2.3 Feb 1955) -2-· 

TOP SECRET
EXHIBIT 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

I, Robert O. Knutson, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Wind Energy America Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 1O-QSB of Wind Energy America Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.

| Date: February 19, 2008 | /s/ Robert O. Knutson |
|-------------------------|-----------------------|

Robert O. Knutson
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, FOURTEENTH DISTRICT, AT HOUSTON

No. 14-15-00260-CV

Jonathan Salazar

v.

Alta Vista Apts

(No. 1058681 IN COUNTY CIVIL COURT AT LAW NO 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY)

TYPE OF FEE CHARGES PAID/DUE STATUS PAID BY

FILING

STATEWIDE EFILING

$175.00

$20.00

03/25/2015

03/25/2015

NOT PAID

NOT PAID

ANT

ANT

The costs incurred on appeal to the Fourteenth Court of Appeals Houston, Texas 

are $195.00.

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK OF THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF 

APPEALS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing 

is a true and correct copy of the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 

FOURTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS, showing the charges and payments, in the 

above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness 

my hand and the Seal of the COURT 

OF APPEALS for the Fourteenth District 

of Texas, August 20, 2015.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT UNITED STATES OF AM ER IC A, Plaintiff - Appe lle e , v. R OB ER T TIM OTHY SWANK, Sr., De fe nda

nt - Appe lla

nt. No. 14-35511

D.C . Nos. 1:13-c v-00122-SPW

1:10-c r-00086-SPW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of M o nta

na Susa n P. W atte rs, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d August 25, 2015 ** B e fore : M c KEOW

N , C LIFTON, a

nd HUR W ITZ, C irc u it Judge s. Fe de ra l prisone r R obe rt Tim othy Swank, Sr., a

ppe a ls from

the distric t c ourt’ s judgm e nt dismi ssing his motion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 2255, a nd the distric t c ourt’ s orde r de ny ing his m o tion unde r Fe de ra l R ule of C i vil Proc e dure 59(e ). W e



# FIL ED SEP 01 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a )(2).have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . §§ 1291 a nd 2253. W e re ve rse and re m and with instruc tions. Swank c onte nds tha

t the distric t c ourt a

buse d its disc re t ion by

dism issing his se c t ion 2255 motion ba se d on his fa ilure to submit a signe d re que st for c ounse l, and by de ny ing his R

ule 59(e ) m otion, whic h inc lude d a signe d re que st for a ppointm e nt of c ounse l . Whe n an e vide ntia

ry he aring is orde re d , a

ppointm e nt of c ounse l for indige nt se c t ion 2255 mova nts is m an dat ory . S

e e R ule 8(c ) of the R ule s Gove rning Se c tion 2255 Proc e e dings, 28 U.S.C . foll. § 2255; Unite d State s v . Duarte -Higare da , 68 F.3d 369, 370 (9th C ir. 1995) (orde r) . In light of this a uthority , the gove rnm e n t

a gre e s with Swa

nk tha t this c a s e should bere m ande d. Ac c ordingly , we re ve rse and re m and for a ppointm e nt of c ounse l a

nd a n e vide ntia

ry he aring re ga

rding Swa

nk’ s c la im

tha t tria l c ounse l wa s ine ffe c tive whe n a dvising Swank to ple a d guilty . W e de ny Swank’ s re que st for a

n ope n re m and to e na

ble him to re argue the c la im s tha

t the distric t

c ourt de nie d on the m e rits without a n e vide ntia ry he a ring. W e tre a t Swa

nk’ s a dditiona l a

rgum e nts a s a

m otion to e xpa

nd the c e rtific ate of a ppe a l a bility . So tre a t e d, the m otion is denie d . Se e 9th C ir. R . 22-1(e ); Hiiv ala v . W ood , 195 F.3d 1098, 1104-05 (9th C ir. 1999) (pe r c uriam ). RE V E RSE D and RE M ANDE D. 1 4 - 3 5 5 1 1 2
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Letter requesting EPA grant petitions for reconsideration submitted by other parties
### SERVED: May 15, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF ABO SUPPLYLLC FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA 2013- 0713
HEARING NOTICE 

### l£1y ;.:AY I b 

## A iu: 

## 22

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that testimony and evidence will be heard and considered onJuly 8, 9,10 and 11, 2014; inclusive, in the U.S. Tax-Court, Courtroom 7006, CaseyU.S. Courthouse, 515 RuskAvenue, Houston, TX 77002. Hearings will commence at 9:00a.m. and conclude at 4:30p.m. each day. The parties should vacate the courthouse on or before 5:00p.m. each day. Settled cases will not be removed from the docket until theJudge receives the properpleading(s). Pleadings1 

### may be forwarded by fax, express mail, courieror postal service2•

# CJ:!i~~:J Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service List

1 Materials filed in the FAA Hearing Docket (except for materials which are sealed) also available for viewing at http://www.regulations.gov. For additional information see: http://dms.dot.gov. 2 The Administrator's civil penalty decisions, along with indexes ofthe decisions, the Rules ofPractice, as well as other materials relating to civil penalty cases, are available on the internet at: · http://www.faa.gov/aboutloffice org/headquarters offices/agc/po/ adjudicationlagc400/civi/ penalty/; see also: http://ecfr.gpoaccess.govlcgiltltext/text-idx?c=ecfr&tp/=lecfrbrowse/Titlel4/ 14tab 02. tpl. In addition, Thomson Reuters/West Puhlishing publishes Federal Aviation Decisions. Finally, the decisions are available through LEXIS (TRANS library) and WestLaw 9FTRAN-FAA database. For additional information, see the Web site. 1SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2Wl

### OOOr

Scott L. Johnston, Respondent's Counsel Givens & Johnston, PLLC 950 Echo Lane, Suite 360 Houston, TX77024-2788 TEL: 713-932-1540 FAX: 713-932-1542 WATTS: 800-285-8042 ONE COPY

EMAIL: sjohnston@givensjohnston.com James Archier, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office oftheRegional Counsel Southwest Region, ASW-7 Federal Aviation Administration 2601 Meacham Blvd., Suite 679 FortWorth, TX76137 TEL: 817-222-5074 FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 · U.S. Department ofTransportation. 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant/Paralegal FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS Nos.**FAA~2013-0713** (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur WrightBuilding-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.



### 2
REF ID:A65345 

Colonel. B'a.rrod G. Miller 

Signal Division 

Supreme Bead.quarter• 

Allied. Pwera Europe 

laria, France 

Dear Harrod: 

310 Second Street, S.E. ~ahine;ton 3, D. C. 

l June- 1954 

I u gratetu1 to you and to Lieutenant Colonel Arnaud 

tor the 'biographieal •'btch or 0.nero.l Cal-tier. 

I vould, or coune, had. liked lllUCh more on Cartier•• 

connection vith the kcon-Shakespeare •tter, 'but -.ybe there 

ian•t mueh more than vbat Arnaud. put down. 

Pleue be eure to thank Colonel Arnaud tor hi• ettort• in 

'1flY" behalt .. 

With beat :r61'Me, I am, 

Sincerely', 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
**Exhibit 10.9**

FIRST AMENDMENT TO CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT 

This First Amendment to Change in Control Agreement(the “Amendment”) is made this 31st day of December 2008 between BIOMET, INC., an Indiana corporation (“Biomet”), and Steven F. Schiess (“Executive”). All capitalized terms used herein shall havethe meanings ascribed to them in the Change in Control Agreement (defined below), unless otherwise defined herein. 

WHEREAS, Biomet andExecutive entered into that certain Change in Control Agreement dated as of September 20, 2006 (the “CIC Agreement”); 

WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.07 of the CIC Agreement, to the extent that any regulations or guidance issued under Code §409A would result in Executive being subject to the payment of any additional tax under Code §409A, theCompany and Executive agreed, to the extent reasonably possible, to amend the CIC Agreement in order to avoid the imposition of any such additional tax under Code §409A; and 

WHEREAS, Biomet and Executive desire to amend the CIC Agreement on the terms and conditions set forth herein; 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of whichare hereby acknowledged, Biomet and Executive hereby agree as follows: 

1. Section 3.01(b)(i):****Post-CIC Good Reason; OtherThan for Cause or Disability. Section 3.01(b)(i) of the CIC Agreement is hereby amended to delete the final sentence of Section 3.01(b)(i) in its entirety. 

2. Miscellaneous. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the CIC Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. This Amendment may be executed in two (2) or more counterparts, each of whichshall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 

*    *    *    *    * 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this First Amendment to Change in Control Agreement onthe date first set forth above. 

 
BIOMET, INC.By: 
/s/ Bradley J. Tandy
Name: Bradley J. TandyTitle: Senior Vice President, General Counsel & SecretaryEXECUTIVE
/s/ Steven F. Schiess
Name: Steven F. Schiess
~~~~REF ID:A63568 

Jam&ient to Contract JJo. nl lB .. U9-sc-109, 267-Lllf58 (5S-J.YR/PR•l580) Mr. WUliem !'. Prl.e&i:an 

8mPO (Attn: Iii-. Curr&u) '1.'Hl 18 Sep 58 - fhrut 1.00-3 J. F.Caiu/lltor;r/dmt 

llequest tbAt Contract 1fo. .M l.8-U9-ac .. 109, 267-ttH-58 (58 ... t.nr/PR-1580) Y1 th 

lfr. Ytll!am P. Frtedllan be llll!ell4ed to provide that the •ix leoons to be CQl!pleted 

under ProJeet 1 of Article I, ~ a(1) mf113 ~ cl.ueU'ied -.t the discretion o~ 

the eontr&!tor ~ to alt iucludtq caa:me:r:rw.. · N-, 

lOR TUE DIRroTOR CP mAIRIM>: 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a