alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
X>NPfeE.~t!~ .L beew1ty ~anution 

Seria.l : 0 9 4 S 

"I OCT 1953 

SUBJECT: R.R. ll52, 83,rd Congress, lat Sesaion 

l. Re.farence is made tot.be bill, .B.R. 11521 83.rd Coograas, 

lst Senion, .. ,or the Ael.1cf of Williml 1. Friedman,'' concerning 

vb.1ch I bave prev1ou.ly expreased my view at the requeat ~ your 

Department . 

2. Mr • rrtedlaan ha.a now requested me t.o forward "through channels" a letter which he bas vrit~n to tbe llonorable Chauncey w. Reed, 

Chairaan of the aou.. Ccmaittee on the J\Mliciary, setting forth argumems in support of' the full mount of the award sought in l • .R. 1152. 

Mr. Friedll&n.'1 letter is claaaified as "COllrlDBl'l'l.U. - SBCORITY 

ID'OllCA1'1<8" vbich I believe to be the proper cluai.f'1cation. I 

&.110 belie-ve that the .tat.ent in ~ 8a(l)(b) of Jlr. Fried-

~'! letter is accurate aecord1Jl8 to tlwt beet - &Yailable information. 

lovever, l b.&ve not undertaken ill any vay to natne the validity of 

Mr. Friedman'• argi.aent.e. 

3. I have con.idered caref'ul.ly tbe queetion of forwarding Mr. 

Friedman' 1 letter to the Jlouae CcmD.ittff on the J'udici&ry and believe 

that there a.re tvo aapect• to tbt problAlll vbieh involve iaport.ant 

matters of policy, nuel.yi (l} tbe 4eei.nt.b1lity of releuirig cl.usified inform.a.tion to Congress in euppOrt 01· a private bill, and (2) 

whether the releaae ot thi• iJlformatiOll vould require the prior 

aecurity clearance and indoctrination ot the Congressmen o.oncerned. 

lt . Since Mr. P'riedman 1 • letter cont&ina 1.ntormat.ion 1nv ol ving 

both Ccamru.nicatione Intelllaeno• and c,.,...m1 cations Security, the 

special ru.lee involving tboee branches of 1ntelligence apply. In 

view of t.he l1&1t&t1ons established. by hipr aiut.horit7, I doubt 

that the Department of Detenae or any of it• Age.nciee could properly 

reaolve the above question. 

5. In viev or the fact that the Department oft.be A.ray is the 

action ssencY for the DepartD&llt of Dereme on H.!. ll52, I aa •ubnrltting Mr. Friedman'• letter to you and vould appreciate 7oo:r a.dviail'l€ me whether you vould have aey objection to it• transaiuion to 

Cor.:gr-eellllWl Reed if proper authority for r.lea.ae could be obtained. 

&~f,Y Incl: ~ 

RALPK J. c.AllIJIE 

Lieutenant General, US >.nq 

Direct.or 

Mr. ?riadlllan's ltr v/Incle ~~eNFIDENTIAL. 

~, Legal Advisor ,,.::.,/;;;; 

\ 

_, 

- ' ,: I 

-

r 

. 

"' 

"""" ' I 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11437]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04375]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than March 27, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. UniBanc Corp., Maywood, Nebraska; to acquire 100 percent of the 
voting shares of Bank of Stapleton, Stapleton, Nebraska:
    In connection with this proposal, UniBanc Corp. has applied to 
acquire Stapleton Investment Company, and thereby engage in general 
insurance activities in a town greater than 5,000 in population, 
pursuant to section 225.28(b)(11)(iii)(A).

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 25, 
2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-04375 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05339]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, April 9, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Theresa Singleton at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-3329.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Thursday, April 9, 2015, 
at 12:00 p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Theresa Singleton. For more information please contact: 
Theresa Singleton at 1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-3329, TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509--National Office, Washington, DC 
20224, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include a discussion on various letters, and other 
issues related to written communications from the IRS.

    Dated: March 3, 2015.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-05339 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2047 

To terminate the independent third-party program for sectors of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery unless the program is fully funded by the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 

Ms. AYOTTE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To terminate the independent third-party program for sectors 

of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery unless the program 

is fully funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Local Fish5 ing Jobs and Communities Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2047 IS

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF INDEPENDENT THIRD-PARTY 

2 MONITORING. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

4 (b), the Secretary of Commerce shall not require sectors 

5 of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery to comply with the 

6 independent third-party monitoring program required by 

7 section 648.87 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations 

8 (or similar successor regulation). 

9 (b) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary of Commerce may 

10 require sectors of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery to 

11 comply with the independent third-party monitoring pro12 gram required by section 648.87 of title 50, Code of Fed13 eral Regulations (or similar successor regulation), if the 

14 Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

15 Administration fully funds the program with funds appro16 priated for the Administration. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1 The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United St ates District Judge for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the re port and recommendation of the Honorable Robert E. Larsen, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri, to whom the motion was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).
2 The Honorable Fernando J. Gaitan, Jr., United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-2164

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Dana L. Ford, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: March 1, 2006 Filed: March 31, 2006

___________ Before MURPHY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. After the district court 1 denied his motion to suppress evidence seized from his home pursuant to a search warrant, a jury found Dana L. Ford guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The district court 2-2- sentenced him to thirty months in prison and three years of supervised release. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his motion to suppress and his request for an acceptance-of-responsibility reduction. For th e reasons discussed below, we affirm. We first conclude that the district court did not err by denying Ford’s suppression motion because the information w ithin the four corners of the affidavit submitted in support of the search warrant application was sufficient to establish probable cause. See United States v. Solomon , 432 F.3d 824, 827-28 (8th Cir. 2005). We also conclude that the district court did not err by denying Ford a reduction at sentencing for acceptance of responsibility b ecause he challenged his factual guilt at trial. See United States v. Yirkovsky , 338 F.3d 936, 941 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00383-CV

IN RE THE OFFICE OF THE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of 

the opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GARDNER, J. 

DELIVERED: December 13, 2013

 1

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d).
THIRD DIVISION

MCFADDEN, C. J.,

DOYLE, P. J., and HODGES, J.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be

physically received in our clerk’s office within ten

days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed.

https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

DEADLINES ARE NO LONGER TOLLED IN THIS

COURT. ALL FILINGS MUST BE SUBMITTED WITHIN

THE TIMES SET BY OUR COURT RULES.

October 2, 2020

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia

A20A1274, A20A1597, A20A1640. OLADUNNI v. THE STATE

(three cases).

MCFADDEN, Chief Judge.

Ibrahim Oladunni pled guilty to various crimes, and the trial court entered a

judgment of conviction on the plea on March 12, 2019. Within the same term of

court, Oladunni filed a timely motion to withdraw his guilty plea, Dos Santos v. State,

307 Ga. 151, 158 (5) (834 SE2d 733) (2019), and a timely motion in arrest of

judgment. OCGA § 17-9-61 (b). See OCGA § 15-6-3 (3) (terms of court for Atlanta

Circuit Superior Court, which includes Fulton County, commence on the first

Monday in January, March, May, July, September, and November).

He also filed three notices of appeal, two after oral rulings denying his motion

to withdraw his guilty plea and one after the entry of the trial court’s written order
denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. In each notice of appeal, Oladunni

challenged his conviction and sentence, the denial of his motion to withdraw his

guilty plea, and the trial court’s treatment of his motion in arrest of judgment.

Oladunni’s motion in arrest of judgment “was pending when [he] filed [his] notice[s]

of appeal, and as far as we know, his motion still is pending today.” State v. Hood,

295 Ga. 664 (763 SE2d 487) (2014). 

Because Oladunni’s motion in arrest of judgment remains pending, we lack

jurisdiction over his appeals. Oladunni’s “motion [in arrest of judgment] remains

pending, the trial court has jurisdiction to rule on the merits of the motion,

[Oladunni’s] notice[s] of appeal . . . [have] not ripened, and the attempted appeal in

this [c]ourt must be dismissed.” Pounds v. State, __ Ga. __, __ (4) (846 SE2d 48)

(2020) (addressing motion for new trial, which, like a motion in arrest of judgment,

is a resetting post-judgment motion under OCGA § 5-6-38 (a)). “If the motion [in

arrest of judgment] is denied, the judgment from which [Oladunni] seeks to appeal

willstand, and the notice[s] of appeal previously filed by [Oladunni]then will ripen.”

Hood, 295 Ga. at 665.

Appeals dismissed. Doyle, P. J., and Hodges, J., concur.

2
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Jay A. Herman, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Delphax TechnologiesInc. (the Company), do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to myknowledge:
(1) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period endedMarch 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (theReport), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) the information contained in the accompanying Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.   Date May 11, 2004 /s/ Jay A. Herman   Jay A. Herman Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
• REF ID: A6595' 

ST. PAUL, MINN. ARLINGTON, VA. 

g;,~~~~~/A'(J. 

CONFIDENTIAL ~ 507 ..... STREET SOUTH, ARUNGTON, VA. 

l{r. William F. Friedman 

3801 Nebraska Avenue 

Washington 16, D. C. 

Dear Mr. l"riedman: 

24 October 1951 

I'm enclosing a copy of a 1etter from Mr. :McPherson 

concerning Traveling Wave Tube Research which has 

certain implications with respect to your research 

program on Ultra Highspeed Computation. This information will probably be of interest to Captain 

Harper and Dr. Eachus. 

HTE:nlb 

Enclosure 

Yours, 

)211'/.~~ 

H. T. Engstrom 

Vice President 

CONFlDEN'ffAL 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
• REF ID: A659~ 

CONFIBEP~TIAL INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION 

590 MADIOON A VENUE 

Office of 

Vice President 

NEW YORK :a, N. Y. 

September 14, 1951 

co11r±da1t:ial 

Dr. H. T. Engstrom, Vice President 

Engineering ResearchAssociates, Inc. 

507 18th Street South 

Arlington, Virginia 

Dear Dr. Engstrom: 

Relative to the question which was raised at our group's 

meeting yesterday on Traveling Wave Tube Research, I have received 

the following comments: 

Dr. Lester Field at Stanford, who formerly worked with 

John Pierce of Bell Telephone Laboratories, is doing an outstanding 

job on basic research concerning this tube, extending its frequency 

range and learning more about its characteristics; and the work at 

MIT under Dr. L. Smullin also involves an interest in operating at 

higher prequency, but in recent months it is thought that Dr. 

Smullin has been off the traveling wave tube work and active on 

the Valley Committee and now on Project Charles. 

There is also s cme work being done on traveling wave 

tubes at Federal Communications Laboratory in Nutley, New Jersey, 

under John Bryan; in Sperry Gyroscope under Mr. Sheppard, by a 

Mr. Wang, a Chinese. This latter preject is primarily interested 

in very high-power applications of the traveling wave tube. 

In making my inquiries, I assumed that Bell Telephone 

Laboratories' work was already known. The people there undoubtedly are doing a very m.a.jor job on this tube, and you can secure 

comments on their interest and scope of work by inquiry from 

Dr. Potter or Dr. Shannon. 

Very truly yours, 

/s/ 

John c. McPherson 

JCMcP:JW 

GONFICE.[)JTI A I
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1467 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to establish new standards for 

automobile hoods and bumpers to reduce pedestrian injuries, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2015 

Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BOOKER, and Mr. 

SCHATZ) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to establish new 

standards for automobile hoods and bumpers to reduce 

pedestrian injuries, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pedestrian Safety Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MOTOR VEHICLE PEDESTRIAN PROTECTION. 

7 (a) RULEMAKING.—Not later than 2 years after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Trans9 portation, through the Administrator of the National 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1467 IS

1 Highway Traffic Safety Administration, shall issue a final 

2 rule that— 

3 (1) establishes standards for the hood and 

4 bumper areas of motor vehicles, including passenger 

5 cars, multipurpose passenger vehicles, trucks, and 

6 buses with a gross vehicle weight rating of 4,536 

7 kilograms (10,000 pounds) or less, in order to re8 duce the number of injuries and fatalities suffered 

9 by pedestrians who are struck by such vehicles; and 

10 (2) considers the protection of vulnerable pedes11 trian populations, including children and older 

12 adults. 

13 SEC. 3. PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS. 

14 Section 120(c)(1) of title 23, United States Code, is 

15 amended— 

16 (1) by inserting ‘‘including pedestrian hybrid 

17 beacons,’’ after ‘‘traffic control signalization,’’; and 

18 (2) by inserting ‘‘roadway improvements that 

19 provide separation between pedestrians and motor 

20 vehicles, including pedestrian sidewalks and crossing 

21 islands,’’ after ‘‘safety rest areas,’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1467 IS

1 SEC. 4. INCLUSION OF SAFETY PUBLIC AWARENESS CAM2 PAIGNS IN HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT 

3 PROJECTS. 

4 Section 148(a)(4)(B) of title 23, United States Code, 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(xxv) Safety public awareness cam7 paigns.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
ler1al1 I/ 7 cf 

/~~f 

14". S. G- ~ 

~t of Nat.bei.atiCft 

tbdvenity c4 Il.U.nuie 

'C!rbaDa, Il1it101• 

Deu- Stewart l 

The i.ncloaed latter 1'rcm a. v. Duo.well llPPOU• to be 

ill .uver tQ 7041r lettcrr h\v1 tina him to part1cipato in 

lltr • McPber•OA' • l!pCC:lal at\id.Y • Qu.r ftCOrda laO"J lhov that 

nr. ~ aD4 If&'. ~u be.ve agxee4 to devote~ cn'"t'art 

to thia at'Udif. We a:re still wa1 ti!lG ~or ruun.~1; .rram i~. 

Desch, hat* :ro:rreat6r1 and. Mr. Holt.iU"A. Their anr.rer• vlll 

'be t~d to 70U upon arrival. 

Bincerel;;, 

l iaclt 

L'tl" h'o:a 8. W. Dw>.vell 

cc:: AG 

c/s · 

S/ASST (Mr. Friedmn) 

M/R: Self'-explanatory 

M.K. Felerski/8/ASST/6o493/25 Feb 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3 _ t, -
SUBJEQT IDJMBm 

'CBCIB: 13.2/28 

Subject: 

Additional Item (Item 4) ot the Agenda for the 105th 

Meeting of USCIB, held on 13 August 1954. 

Clearance for Category III COMINT (WALTERS - USCIB 13.2/25 of 12 August 1954). 

The ACTING CHAIRMAN introduced this item, adding that clearance had 

been requested by NSC and asked for comment. 

GENERAL CANINE asked what the mission of the Net Evaluation Subcommittee is. 

The ACTIN1 CHAIRMAN explained that it is to make an assessment of the 

net capabilities of our enemies to do us serious injury. 

MR. SHELDON added that by this action we 'WOul.d obviate the need for 

clearance of some 25 other people comprising the Committee. 

GENERAL CANINE moved that the Board agree that Mr. Walters has a 

"need to know" for Category III COMINT. 

MR. GODEL stated that Mr:. Walters has had a full field investigation 

and has both TOP SECRET and "Q" clearance now. 

The motion was carried unanimously. 

DECISION: (13 August 1954) IBCIB agreed that Mr. Ralph T. Walters of 

the NSC staff has a need to know Category III COMINT for the purpose of 

enabling him to perform his duties as Executive Secretary of the Net 

Capabilities Evaluation Sub-Committee of the National Security Council 

·and that l;he CIA member should undertake appropriate administrative 

action. · 

The meeting adjourned at 1626 and went into Executive Session. 

WCIB: 13.2/28 - 16 -

SECRET 

eclassifi ed and a roved for release b NSA on 11-21-2014 ursuant to E .0. 1352
REF ID:A38733 i:; Cl. :,i;,:I<. .. ..t--~-- ! '~ ·...-w.. .-.4'l'~"!A- • --.r." 

.....----

·--- .. ::ii-- - ..,,, .,. 

. ... 

II 

.. .. . 

-

~, ...... - .t. 

j .. 

.. 

' 

. 

':. 

' 

Ip 

Jlaoot. n. v. .ADclree Dlt~nt ot rathe."'latlos 

TAe vm."NNlv or Clclaha:a 

-.ii, Cklahma 

DIU' ftofeuor AD.lr'eo1 

...Wt 1154 

31 JUL 1961 

Jllaeipt of ~ let.tor ot 21 J~ 1951 1e acknow'ledpd.. 

n, u trit.h 111eh ....-i. that I haw t.o adv1ae 100 ~t ..te.b119had Deport&::ent. ot Wenae pollCJ' ;rNClud.01 rq INP~ J"Oll 

11ltb azv IMtographa ar pibllca.t.io.ne auch aa 1'* .... uaa. 

I &am» that J'OU haft eoneul~ Prof .. Galland'•~ 

~~rt.z ~~· 1lh1ob.1 ln If' opbd.on, ie ml 

wt Cori ete bllo£ftt.Pb7 tbua ter p;.bli 9hecl. 

l:nll t.bc:ueh t t.lnt .,..:t.t unable t.o ue1.at JOU. l hope t.hat 

JOU 11111 be pnaroua moudi t.o em1 m a npr1nt ot 70Jr ..Ucle 

an aa1lablo .. 

1H1Bam r. Priedmon/et/30 Jul Sl 1-

AFSk-O<Jr, Ext 6o240 \!J 

~, "1a 

-~--pp-r-ov-e~d~fo-r=R~el~ea_s_e~b-y~N~S~A-o-n~0~9-~1~2-~2~01~3....-pu-r-su-a-nt-to--=E~.0~.~13~5~2-a __ ~----*~' ~-