alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ENTRY ORDER

SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2013-256

DECEMBER TERM, 2013

In re John Davis Buckley, Esq. } Original Jurisdiction 

}

}

 }

} Professional Responsibility Board 

}

} PRB NO. 2014-007

In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter:

Pursuant to Administrative Order 9, Rule 21.E., a hearing panel of the Professional 

Responsibility Board has filed a written report with the Court recommending that it grant 

respondent John Davis Buckley’s petition for reinstatement from disability inactive status, 

subject to specified conditions. Based upon the report and recommendation, the Court finds by 

clear and convincing evidence that reinstatement is warranted, and grants the petition subject to 

the following conditions:

1. Petitioner shall be placed on probation for a period of one year, commencing on the 

date of this order, under the provisions of Administrative Order 9, Rule 8.A(6).

2. The probation shall be supervised by a probation monitor acceptable to Disciplinary 

Counsel.

3. Respondent shall, on a bi-monthly basis, review his client files with the probation 

monitor to discuss areas of client communication and practice management. 

4. During the period of probation, petitioner shall continue to consult with his treating 

psychiatrist, Dr. Kalibat, on a regular basis and as recommended. Dr. Kalibat shall 

provide Disciplinary Counsel with quarterly written reports as to respondent’s 

condition and shall note any concerns in his report.

5. In the event Dr. Kaliban becomes unavailable, respondent shall seek treatment from 

another physician, notify Disciplinary Counsel, and arrange for the same written 

reports to be filed with Disciplinary Counsel. 

6. Respondent shall accept and implement all reasonable suggestions offered by the 

probation monitor and Dr. Kalibat or his replacement physician. 

7. All expenses of probation shall be the responsibility of respondent.
2

8. Respondent’s probation shall be renewed or terminated after one year as provided in 

Administrative Order 9, Rule 8.A(6).

9. Prior to readmission, respondent shall satisfy in full his Continuing Legal Education 

requirements, which shall include eight live credit hours in the areas of client 

communication and practice management.

 

BY THE COURT:

Paul L. Reiber, Chief Justice

John A. Dooley, Associate Justice

Marilyn S. Skoglund, Associate Justice

Beth Robinson, Associate Justice

Geoffrey W. Crawford, Associate Justice
SCWC-30402
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

JOHN E. ROBINS, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,

vs. STATE OF HAWAI # I , Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 30402; S.P.P. NO. 08-1-0014 (CR. NO. 02-1-0671))
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, Duffy, McKenna, JJ.)

Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant John E. Robins’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on January 9, 2012, is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, February 13, 2012. Keith S. Shigetomi, on the application forPetitioner/PetitionerAppellant. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30402 13-FEB-2012 11:28 AM
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MICHAEL GHANEM,

Appellant,

v.

DARLENE DIAK GHANEM n/k/a DARLENE DIAK,

Appellee.

No. 4D2022-3273

[February 29, 2024]

Appeal and cross-appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura C. Burkhart, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. 50-2015-DR-004206-XXXX-SB.

Vanessa L. Prieto of Vanessa L. Prieto Law Offices, L.L.C., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellant.

Nancy A. Hass of Nancy A. Hass, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

DAMOORGIAN, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. This court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

AUG 17 1998

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

TENTH CIRCUIT

TERRY F. WALLING,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CHARLES SIMMONS, Kansas Secretary

of Corrections,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 98-3115

(D.C. No. 94-CV-3398)

(District of Kansas)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before PORFILIO, KELLY, and HENRY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.
- 2 -

Terry F. Walling appeals the order of the district court granting summary judgment

against him on his complaint for declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. Our review

of the records reveals the district court did not err in its judgment, and we AFFIRM for

the same reasons given by the district court in its order.

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

John C. Porfilio

Circuit Judge
WASHDIGTC& 25, D~ C., 

7 May 1952 

l)ear :Brigadier I 

Bega.rd ~ note (lloP.2766) o:t 25 April 1952, A!'SA baa 

no Jmavledge ot ~purchase or cont.enqllated purchase by the I IQf' cipher machiDea in tbe U.S.A. 

Aa ibly bear1.Ds on tbie subject, we have al 

'lll8 J)eJartaent ot State baa ~ intormed ot thia meaaage 

8Dd they are an tbe alert for any a~ in the premises. 

Ycun sincerely, 

EO 3 . 3 ( h) ( 2 ) 

John vuu._ PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

TOP SECRET -----1 eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 03-14-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-4330

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DONTE LAMONT DINGLE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cr-00204-DKC-1)

Submitted: November 29, 2022 Decided: January 27, 2023

Before AGEE and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Christopher M. Davis, Mary E. Davis, DAVIS & DAVIS, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellant. Erek L. Barron, United States Attorney, Brandon K. Moore, Assistant 

United States Attorney, LaRai N. Everett, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4330 Doc: 73 Filed: 01/27/2023 Pg: 1 of 3
2

PER CURIAM:

Donte Dingle was convicted by a jury of ten offenses arising from four armed 

robberies. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(c), 1951(a). The district court sentenced Dingle

to 30 years of imprisonment, to be followed by 5 years of supervised release. Dingle raises

three questions related to the search warrant of Dingle’s room: whether the warrant was 

supported by probable cause; whether the warrant affidavit contained material 

misstatements and omissions; and whether the issuing magistrate had power to authorize a 

warrant. Dingle also objects to two of the district court’s evidentiary rulings: its admission 

of witness testimony about the robbery suspect’s shirt, and its limitation of Dingle’s

counsel’s cross-examination of an FBI witness.

Before the district court, Dingle objected to the veracity of the warrant affidavit and 

whether the warrant was supported by probable cause. This Court thus reviews the district 

court’s factual findings on those issues for clear error and its legal determinations de novo. 

United States v. Scott, 941 F.3d 677, 683 (4th Cir. 2019); United States v. Jones, 942 F.3d 

634, 640 (4th Cir. 2019). Because Dingle objects to the issuing magistrate’s authority for 

the first time before this Court, he must establish a plain error that affected his substantial 

rights. United States v. Nelson, 37 F.4th 962, 966 (4th Cir. 2022); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 

52(b). Finally, because Dingle made the same evidentiary objections before the district 

court and has thus preserved them, we review those rulings for abuse of discretion, mindful 

of whether any errors were harmless. See United States v. Walker, 32 F.4th 377, 394 (4th 

Cir. 2022). 

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4330 Doc: 73 Filed: 01/27/2023 Pg: 2 of 3
3

We have carefully reviewed the record and have identified no reversible error. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-4330 Doc: 73 Filed: 01/27/2023 Pg: 3 of 3
., ? . ::...(<.\ 

1~-3,02-

1·~ - 3,7,..l. ;\'";:> 

'v' ·v 

/ \ v .-, 1 

......... •. 

,--{;. l.'Y 0 

?· 3 u
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               4
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,441
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,536
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,236
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,530
<BONDS>                                          1,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            38
<OTHER-SE>                                      (1,787)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,236
<SALES>                                            115
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   115
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    98
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 150
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (281)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (281)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    (20)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (261)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the ‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the ‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 13th day of March,  2007.

|        |  |  |                  |
|--------|--|--|------------------|
| /S/    |  |  | KENNETH L. WOLFE |
|   |  |  | KENNETH L. WOLFE |
|        |

----
Letter Agreement dated December 22, 2010



 Exhibit 10.41 
 



 
 December 22, 2010 
 Glasshouse Technologies, Inc. 
 200 Crossing Boulevard 

Framingham, MA 01702 
  

			
	RE:	  	LOAN AND SECURITY AGREEMENT NO. 4091 DATED JUNE 30, 2004,
AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, BY AND BETWEEN LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL
PARTNERS V, L.P. (“LIGHTHOUSE”) AS LENDER AND GLASSHOUSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
(“GLASSHOUSE”) AS BORROWER (THE “LIGHTHOUSE LOAN”)

 To Whom It May Concern: 
 Whereas Glasshouse and WF FUND III LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, c/o/b as WELLINGTON FINANCIAL LP and WELLINGTON FINANCIAL FUND III, (collectively “Wellington”) are Borrower and Lender,
respectively, under that certain Loan and Security Agreement dated as of March 29, 2010, as amended, (the “Wellington Loan”), and; 
 Whereas Lighthouse, Wellington and Glasshouse are parties to that certain Intercreditor Agreement dated March 29, 2010, and; 
 Whereas Glasshouse has violated a financial covenant under the Wellington Loan and is in technical default, and; 
 Whereas per the terms of the Intercreditor Agreement the Wellington Loan default is a default under the Lighthouse Loan, and; 
 Now therefore, Lighthouse agrees with the terms of Section 4.C of that certain Amendment No. 2 to Loan and Security Agreement dated December     , 2010, between
Glasshouse and Wellington. 
 Lighthouse hereby waives any and all defaults and events of default existing as of the date hereof under the
Lighthouse Loan, the Intercreditor Agreement and the documents executed in connection therewith. 
  

			
	Sincerely,
	
	Lighthouse Capital Partners V, L.P.
	By:	 	Lighthouse Management Partners V,
	L.L.C., its general partner
		
	By:	 	 





		 	Thomas Conneely
		 	Vice President

 PHONE 415.464-5950 FAX 415.925.3387 

500 DRAKES LANDING ROAD, GREENBRAE, CA 94904-3011
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KEITH B. COX,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 593 EAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER
63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the Annual Report of Creative Technology Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ng Keh Long, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ Ng Keh LongNg Keh Long Chief Financial Officer Date: November 16, 2007
A. B. Cryptotekn1k lordent"lJrchtavagen, 62 

Stockholm 30, 8vee!bn 

Dear Mr- liyberg: 

REF 

310 Second. Street, B.E. 

Wuhington 31 D. C. 

19 October 1954 

I am grateful tor your aending me so promptly the 

photographs and. negatives at the C·4 8ZJd. BC-Jm.chinea. 

'l'b.ese are exact)¥ What I lleeded in connection with re~ 

viaing DJY' article 1n the Encyclopaedi«. llritannica.. 

We are all quite well here and I thank you and. Mra. 

If;y'berg 'tor ;your good. vishea, which I reciprocate 1n full 

measure. In case tha He.gellns a.re &till in Stockholm 

pleaee convey a a:pecial greeting to them :rrom ue. 

Sincerely, 

WILLIAM P. FRIEIJMN 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-16-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
I 

; .. 

• REF ID:A2263014 

BORIS HAGELIN • Sundsor, Sweden, Aug 26, 45. 

Mr. William F. Friedman, 

Chief Cryptanalyst (I hope this is the right title) 

U.S. Signal Corps. 

En~land. 

Dear Bill, 

We just had a letter from Elizabeth, telling us that you were 

in Encland (or had been there on Aug. 6), so I am trying to get 

in touch with you with these lines. 

First of all I want to congratulate you on your childrens act~ 

vities. Elizabeth told us both about Barbaras work in ·.Panama, 

and Johns at Mersersburg and in the Army, and we understand r 

that you must be proud of them! 

And then I wonder if Stockholm is on your visiting list; and 

if it isnt, I hope that you can 13et permission to come here 

for a few days at least. Our main motive for wanting you to 

co~e here is of course th~t we would very much want to have 

you as our guest and to have a nice reunion. But[f think that 

your trip here might bring you some supplementary information 

on the German secret communication systems. I have just come 

back from a trip to Denmarkj which was very instructive in 

that respect, and which complemented my own picture of those 

activities very nicely. 

If these linss reach you, when you are still in Europe, you 

could always get in touch with me, either by writing to the 

above adress (§.~r!dsor, Sweden), or by co:nmunicating with Major 

Arthur Conradi Jr, Asst. Military Air Attache, U S Legation in 

Stockholm. He is a friend of ours (and especially Ingrid), and 

has promised to do his best to establish co~munications with 

-T 

you. \ 

Elizabeth told us that you wEre feeling fit, and we are glad 

to know that! Now with the war successfully fou5ht to a victo~ 

ious close, it should be possible for you and Elizabeth to take 

t Lne off for a we 11 needed and we 11 earned rest. I hope that 

you can find your way to come both of you next summer h0re for 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

~ 

-

~ 

= 

!!!!!!!!! 

-

i!iii 

I 

• 

--

I 

!! 

--

-

• 

--

= 

~ 

I 

I 

= 

--

= -

= • !!!!!!!! 

!'!"'!' 

• 

• • I 

i 

• I 

I
Dr. Juliua •• !tratt.~ts 

' . 

leri< 73 0 

//)~/' 

f.104 President. and Pl'¥VOGt 

Xau&chusot.tl* Imtituto ot 'fechnoloQ' 

Ccabridae 39, .MuQ.C..iuaotta 

Our Or. ~rat.torn 

It. is with rogret, that, I learn that '°u pref ti.I" not 

to be oonsidtn"ed. tor ~rahip on \he !leotronlce Panel 

•f t..'19 W&tional. Security Aconoy Sctletitto Adri.Mr-J li>a.rd. 

Howovur, let M thank )'Ott for 70ur pl'Oelpt. repq and kind 

Hn!lideration. or tho utter. 

COi AG 

iAlJ>H J • CmF' 

Lieutenant General, tt:3 ~ 

m.roctor 

c/s 

5/ASST (Mr. Friedman) 

M/Rt Acknowledgment ot Dr. Strattonts ltr dtd 27 Jan 54. 

Dr. Stratton will be unable to accept the Director's invitation 

or memborship on the Electronics Panel, or NSASAB. 

J.M?eleraki/S/ASST/60493/3 Feb 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
Dm 1 

S/Mm 2 

AG 3 

C/S 4 

115 5-6 

DIDSA 

IOPOftU 

PI.EASE PASS TO GENERAL A?~T moM GEf.ERAL CWiD:E 

-:' -st:etirtln' lNFeRMAFIJN-

:l ':;~~3 

YOU MAI RECALL THAT SEVERAL 'YBARS .AGO MR. FR!EllW~ INTRODUCED MR. BORIS HJ.GELIN 

TO IOU AT THE ARMY-NAVY COOf.'TRY cwa. MR. HAGELIK IS 4 SWEDE l'OW LIVD;G IN 

~1) 'WHO HAS D.'VEh"TEO SEVERAL CRYPTOORAPHIC DEVICES Ir.CUJDING THE M-209 

AND OTHER S1J(ILA.'Ft MACHINES IN USE BI SEVER.AL COU?iTRDS. HK HAS REMAINED ACTIVE 

IN THE FIELD Ahl) HAS SEVERAL liEV DEV'ICES A.BOOT READY FOR LARGE-SCAlE PRODUCTION. 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

WILLIAM F. PUIIIIWi 

8/ASST 60/+93 

l 

Declassified and aooroved for release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e ........, - • - ~v:w.t ~- --

2 
D1IR 1 

S/lSS'!. 2 

.A.G 3 

C/S 4 

115 5-6 

WIJ,.t:wt 1. PRJ:EJl.'.A?I 

S/ASST 

REF ID:A67049 

2.5 MAY 1953 ROUTil~ 

.I 

............................................................... 

EO 3.3(h)(2) 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 -

L 

2
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Stephen B. Waters, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties Fund XVI;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



(a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)

Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 8, 2007

/s/Stephen B. Waters

Stephen B. Waters



Vice President of Fox Capital Management Corporation, equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership
.. ,,.. 

' 

·=.;~ 

!Ot obi.et ot swt 

l Inal 

e/c 

REF ID:A68354 

Subjects IBM Electronic Data Processing Machines 

t 

~ @'pp roved for Release by NSA on 06-16-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a ~