alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Sutton, Tia

From: Sutton, Tia Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:59 PM To: Whiteman, Chad; Hengst, Benjamin Subject: RE: EPA Aircraft GHG/EF - supplemental document Attachments: ICF_CO2 Analysis of CO2-Reducing Technologies for A ircraft_March 17 2015....docx

Hi Chad, Study is attached.

Thanks! -Tia

From: Whiteman, Chad [mailto:Chad_S_Whiteman@omb.eop.gov ] Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 3:53 PM To: Sutton, Tia; Hengst, Benjamin Subject: RE: EPA Aircraft GHG/EF - supplemental document

Would you folks please provide the ICR study refere nced in footnote 237? Thanks, Chad
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JAMES LEVELL, III,

Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM D. SNYDER, Sheriff of Martin County,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-2736

[February 14, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, 

Martin County; Barbara W. Bronis, Judge; L.T. Case No. 17-611CA.

James Levell, III, Stuart, pro se.

Brittany Brooks of Martin County Sheriff’s Office, Stuart, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without prejudice to Appellant filing a timely Rule 1.540 

Motion for Relief from Judgment.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
----

----

I Πράξεις για την ισχύ των οποίων απαιτείται δημοσίευση

----

ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΌΣ (ΕΚ) αριθ. 728/2006 ΤΟΥ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΊΟΥ

της 15ης Μαΐου 2006

για την αναστολή και την υπό όρους κατάργηση του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2193/2003 για επιβολή πρόσθετων δασμών στις εισαγωγές ορισμένων προϊόντων, καταγωγής Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών της Αμερικής

ΤΟ ΣΥΜΒΟΥΛΙΟ ΤΗΣ ΕΥΡΩΠΑΪΚΗΣ ΕΝΩΣΗΣ,

Έχοντας υπόψη:

τη συνθήκη για την ίδρυση της Ευρωπαϊκής Κοινότητας, και ιδίως το άρθρο 133,

την πρόταση της Επιτροπής,

Εκτιμώντας τα ακόλουθα:

ΕΞΕΔΩΣΕ ΤΟΝ ΠΑΡΟΝΤΑ ΚΑΝΟΝΙΣΜΟ:

Άρθρο 1

1.   Η αναστολή της εφαρμογής πρόσθετων δασμών που προβλέπεται στα άρθρα 1 και 2 του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 171/2005 παρατείνεται έως τις 29 Μαΐου 2006.

2.   Εάν ο Πρόεδρος των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών υπογράψει τον Νόμο που ενέκρινε το Κογκρέσο των Ηνωμένων Πολιτειών για την κατάργηση των διατάξεων περί κεκτημένων δικαιωμάτων του Νόμου FSC-ETI και του Νόμου JOBS στις ή πριν από τις 26 Μαΐου 2006, ο κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2193/2003, καταργείται με ισχύ από τις 29 Μαΐου 2006.

3.   Μετά την προαναφερθείσα υπογραφή, η Επιτροπή θα δημοσιεύσει αμέσως, στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, ανακοίνωση σχετικά με το ότι η υπογραφή έλαβε χώρα και ότι ο κανονισμός (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2193/2003 του Συμβουλίου καταργήθηκε με ισχύ από τις 29 Μαΐου 2006.

4.   Εάν η προαναφερθείσα υπογραφή δεν λάβει χώρα έως τις 26 Μαΐου 2006, η Επιτροπή θα δημοσιεύσει αμέσως, στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης, ανακοίνωση σχετικά με το ότι η εν λόγω υπογραφή δεν έλαβε χώρα, και ότι τα αντισταθμιστικά μέτρα, κατά τα προβλεπόμενα από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 2193/2003, εφαρμόζονται εκ νέου με ισχύ από τις 30 Μαΐου 2006.

Άρθρο 2

Ο παρών κανονισμός αρχίζει να ισχύει από την ημέρα της δημοσίευσής του στην Επίσημη Εφημερίδα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ένωσης.

Ο παρών κανονισμός είναι δεσμευτικός ως προς όλα τα μέρη του και ισχύει άμεσα σε κάθε κράτος μέλος.

Βρυξέλλες, 15 Μαΐου 2006.

Για το Συμβούλιο

Η Πρόεδρος

U. PLASSNIK

----

(1)EE L 328 της 17.12.2003, σ. 3· κανονισμός όπως τροποποιήθηκε από τον κανονισμό (ΕΚ) αριθ. 171/2005 (EE L 28 της 1.2.2005, σ. 31).

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 23, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 05-40708

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE EDUARDO HERNANDEZ-BELTRAN, 

also known as Francisco Javier Beltran,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:04-CR-1060-ALL

--------------------

Before GARZA, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jose Eduardo Hernandez-Beltran (Hernandez) appeals his

guilty-plea conviction and sentence for being illegally present

in the United States following removal. Hernandez argues that

the district court erred by finding that his prior Texas felony

conviction for burglary of a habitation was a crime of violence

under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). In United States v. GarciaMendez, 420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir. 2005), petition for cert.

filed (Dec. 15, 2005)(No. 05-8542), this court held that a prior
No. 05-40708

-2-

Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation was a prior

conviction for a crime of violence under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii)

because it was equivalent to the enumerated offense of burglary

of a dwelling. Hernandez asserts that Garcia-Mendez is

inapplicable to the present case because the issue in that case

was reviewed for plain error and because this court did not apply

the categorical analysis mandated by Taylor v. United States, 495

U.S. 575 (1990). While the review of this issue in Garcia-Mendez

was for plain error, this court clearly held that a Texas

conviction for burglary of a habitation was a conviction for a

crime of violence under § 2L1.2(b)(1)(A)(ii). See Garcia-Mendez,

420 F.3d at 456-57. Hernandez’s argument that this court did not

properly apply the categorical analysis of Taylor in GarciaMendez is nothing more than an argument that Garcia-Mendez was

incorrectly decided, and is unavailing. See Burge v. Parish of

St. Tammany, 187 F.3d 452, 466 (5th Cir. 1999) (applying prior

panel rule). 

Hernandez’s constitutional challenge to 8 U.S.C. § 1326 is

foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224,

235 (1998). Although Hernandez contends that Almendarez-Torres

was incorrectly decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court

would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of Apprendi v. New

Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), we have repeatedly rejected such

arguments on the basis that Almendarez-Torres remains binding. 

See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.),
No. 05-40708

-3-

cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 298 (2005). Hernandez properly concedes

that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres and

circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for

further review. 

AFFIRMED.
HUNTON& 

WILLIAMS 

June 5, 2014 

Ms. Heidi Bethel 

U.S. EPA, Office of Water 

Health and Ecological Criteria Division (Mail Code 4304T) 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW. 

Washington, DC 20460 

HUNTON & WILLIAMS LLP 

RIVERFRONT PLAZA, EAST TOWER 

951 EAST BYRD STREET 

RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219-4074 

TEL 804 • 788 • 8200 

FAX 804 • 788 • 8218 

MIRANDA R. YOST 

DIRECT DIAL: 804 • 788 • 8572 

EMAIL: myost@hunton.com 

FILE NO: 29142.070296 

RE: Request for Extension of the Comment Deadline for the Draft Updated National 

Recommended Water Quality Criteria for the Protection of Human Health; 

79 Fed. Reg. 27303 (May 13, 2014), Docket Id. No. EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0135 

Dear Ms. Bethel: 

I am writing on behalf of the Utility Water Act Group (UW AG) and its member companies to 

request that EPA extend the comment period for its recently released draft updated national 

recommended water quality criteria for the protection of human health (Docket ID No.: EPAHQ-OW-2014-0135). The public comment period is scheduled to end on July 14, 2014. 

UW AG and its members request a 60-day extension of the comment period, until September 

12, 2014. 

UW AG is a voluntary, ad hoc, non-profit, unincorporated group whose members operate 

power plants and other facilities that generate, transmit, and distribute electricity to customers 

in the United States. UWAG member companies must obtain National Pollution Discharge 

Elimination System (NPDES) permits issued in accordance to the Clean Water Act (CWA), 

and therefore are directly impacted by EPA's water quality criteria. 

EPA has made available the updated criteria for the purpose of obtaining public comments. 

Additional time is needed, however, to allow the public to meaningfully comment. EPA has 

proposed updates to its national recommended ambient water quality criteria for human health 

for 94 separate chemical pollutants. In conjunction with these draft criteria, EPA has released 

94 chemical-specific science documents. Furthermore, the updated criteria incorporate a 

newly-released updated fish consumption rate, which also is accompanied by significant 

technical analysis. EPA's current comment period does not allow adequate time for a 

ATLANTA AUSTIN BANGKOK BEIJING BRUSSELS CHARLOTTE DALLAS HOUSTON LONDON LOS ANGELES 

McLEAN MIAMI NEW YORK NORFOLK RALEIGH RICHMOND SAN FRANCISCO TOKYO WASHINGTON 

www.hunton.com 
HUNTON& 

WILLIAMS 

Ms. Heidi Bethel 

June 5, 2014 

Page 2 

comprehensive review of the draft criteria updates and extensive associated scientific 

analyses. Therefore, UWAG and its members request additional time to review and analyze 

these complex documents in order to prepare substantive comments. 

UW AG and its members believe that their public comment extension request is reasonable 

and should be granted. Accordingly, UW AG requests that EPA grant its request for a 60-day 

extension of the public comment period. 

Miranda R. Yost 

cc: Robert R. Wylie 

Terry E. Cheek
<PAGE>

                                                                       Exhibit 5
                                                                       ---------


                               August 17, 1999



Geerlings & Wade, Inc.
960 Turnpike Street
Canton, Massachusetts 02021

     Re:  Registration Statement on Form S-8
          ----------------------------------

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This opinion is furnished to you in connection with a registration
statement on Form S-8 (the "Registration Statement"), filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, for the registration of 150,000 shares of common stock, $.01 par value
(the "Shares"), of Geerlings & Wade, Inc. (the "Company").  The Shares are
issuable under the Company's Stock Option Plan, as amended (the "Stock Option
Plan").

     We have acted as counsel for the Company in connection with the Stock
Option Plan and are familiar with the actions taken by the Company in connection
therewith.  For purposes of this opinion, we have examined copies of the
Registration Statement, the Stock Option Plan and such other documents as we
have deemed appropriate.

     Based upon the foregoing, we are of the opinion that, when the Shares have
been issued and sold and consideration received by the Company therefor in
accordance with the terms of the Stock Option Plan, the Shares will have been
validly issued and will be fully paid and non-assessable.

     We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as part of the Registration
Statement.

                                   Very truly yours,


                                   /s/ Ropes & Gray
                                   ----------------------------
                                   Ropes & Gray
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000351685
<NAME> HELM RESOURCES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                              64
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,961
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        232
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,693
<PP&E>                                          11,104
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,680
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   7,860
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,553
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            25
<OTHER-SE>                                     (3,873)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     7,860
<SALES>                                         13,996
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,996
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,253
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,391
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 675
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (577)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (577)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   (168)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (745)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Approved for Release: 2017/08/16 COS099771 

29 April 71 

·Wbea··:Cbe attached :memo was sent 

t'~':j/ .. ,t'Q;,;pu:£.~ .. 1gnature ",00 lJ1d,ic-at,eQ 

,ades:lre:to discus. the su~j.ect wtth 

,.omeQne'IJ 

.... 1C..-.'<fl:scuea.d cbta .oning 

by JI~.I lana Col $weeney. 

lS811Y futther action deaired. 

EdwlaP .. he~y 

Colonel. USAF 

Approved for Release: 2017/08/16 COS099771 

50X1 
for Release: 2017/08/16 CO 

TOP SECRET 

;s(NATIONAL RECONNAISSANCE OFFICE 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

OffICE Of THE DIIRECTOIR 

MEMORANDUM FOR MR. PACKARD 

SUBJEC T: NRP Collection Effort 

The following data are provided in response to your question 

regarding the percentage of NRP collection effort directed toward 

ICBM's and ABM's: 

Film. Expenditure 

GAMBIT 

ICBM 1.,.S1.3~ 

ABM ,," 1..J% 

CORONA 

~ n". l.~. "~6 

Tnere are 26 ICBM com.plexes with 1# 509 silos, 

compared to 2 ABM complexes with 20 deployed 

sites, test range sites, and associated radars. 

SIGINT Expenditure 

ABM ICBM OTHER 

50X1 

CORONA EARPOP GAMBIT 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

I I CONTROL NO, ______ _ 

TOP SECRET EXCLUDED FROM AUTOMATIC REGRADING 

000 DIRECTIVE 520010 DOES NOT APPLY 

COPY ___ OF_--,,-_COPIES 

PAGE __ 1 __ OF __ 2 __ PAGES 

for Release: 2017/08/16 COS099771Zi, ·m~m1·'wm~~.· "'1· ••• m[~~Z 
for Release: 2017/08/16 COS099771 

.. 

TOP SECRET BIEMAN 

SIGINT Expenditure (Continued) 

HANDLE VIA 

BYEMAN 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

~BM ICBM OTHER --- ------

TRIPOS/ SOUSEA 0 0 lOO~V! 

STRAWMAN: THRESHER 200/11:1 0 SOo/lUI 

REAPER 2.0«1iOJ 0 80'111 

CONVOY 100% 0 0 

SAVANT 2.So/!ll 10,.$ S'III 

TIVOLI 600/0 101$ 30'-irI 

WESTON 0 0 HWo/!IIl 

LAM PAN /SAMPAN So/lfP 0 95% 

POppy 100/1.1 0 30,$ 

VAMPAN 50/0 0 95% 

TOPHAT 0 0 100'711)) 

It is not possible to calculate precise tasking percentages 

for each mission.. Therefore» the precentages given are 

approximate numbers based upon guidance issued by the 

Satellite Operations Center .. 

If we can provide any additional informationJ please advise .. 

John L. 'M cLucas 

TOP SECRET 

'J'lUPE(I nOli .lItOIl_.ne .. t~!U!>i"~ 

1100 O.M(Cllvt ~lOO '0 !)()U .. ot unApproved for Release: 7/08/16 COS099771 

_~_ !NIl, ______ _ 

,~~._.._-iIII'._...",...-.1:,1Ilf'111I 

.... u 2 .... _...;.2;;.,.-_ "''''n
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1994
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                              25
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,098
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                        213
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,069
<PP&E>                                          10,601
<DEPRECIATION>                                   8,038
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   9,392
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,601
<BONDS>                                          3,242
<COMMON>                                            24
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,663)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     9,392
<SALES>                                         11,183
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,183
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,623
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 687
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (773)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (773)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (773)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>
    
    <ARTICLE>                         5
           
    <S>                               <C>
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1998
    <PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1998
    <PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1998 
    <CASH>                                            0
    <SECURITIES>                                      0
    <RECEIVABLES>                                     0
    <ALLOWANCES>                                      0
    <INVENTORY>                                       0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
    <PP&E>                                            0
    <DEPRECIATION>                                    0
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    0
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
    <BONDS>                                           0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
    <PREFERRED>                                       0
    <COMMON>                                          0
    <OTHER-SE>                                   672769     
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      0
    <SALES>                                           0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
    <CGS>                                             0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
    <INCOME-TAX>                                      0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
    <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
    <CHANGES>                                         0
    <NET-INCOME>                                      0
    <EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0

    
</TABLE>
#### Clifford vs. The State. [Application for Stay.]

*May 31, 1883.*

*Criminal law*— Stay *of execution.*

Cole, C. J. In a criminal case no stay or delay of the execution of the judgment, under sec. 4724, B. S., should be granted unless error in the proceedings on the trial clearly appears or there are some special circumstances which render a stay necessary.

A writ of error having issued out of this court, May 23, 1883, to review the proceedings in the case of *The State v. Clifford*[see ante, p. 113], the chief justice ordered a stay of execution of the sentence until May 31, 1883. On that day an application to the chief justice for a further stay of execution was denied, and the following opinion was filed:

Cole, 0. J.

In a criminal case no stay or delay of the execution of the judgment, under sec. 4721, E. S., should be granted unless error in the proceedings on the trial clearly appears, or there are some special circumstances which render a stay necessary.

*128In this case it does not clearly appear that there was any ■error committed on the trial which could prejudice the •plaintiff in error; nor are any special circumstances shown which render a stay of the execution of the judgment proper and necessary.
/ - • !' 

, . / 

.................... 

I REF ID:A56863 • 

-----&L-\filpproved for Release by NSA on 05-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
·~...,.-~ 

REF ID:A56863. 

' .
~D Sr41

~‘ 

### • t UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

z

~ ~. .d ~ REGIONIX

~ 75 Hawthorne Street 

### % San Francisco, CA 94105 ~c p~o~c July 8, 2014

David C. Bloomfield, Plant Manager Arizona Public Service Company Four Corners Electric Power Station P.O. Box 355 Fruitland, NM 87416-0355 Re: Completeness Determination for Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration Permit Application forthe Four Corners Power Plant Dear Mr. Bloomfield: This letter concerns the status ofyour application for a Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD) permitfrom the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 thatwould authorize the construction and operation ofselective catalytic reduction systems on Units 4 and 5 atthe Four Corners Power Plant in Fruitland, New Mexico. We received your application on April 29, 2014 by email and May 2, 2014 by mail. You have since provided EPAwith supplemental information necessaryforprocessingthe PSD permit application, including yourAddendum dated July 2, 2014. Pursuantto 40 CFR sections 52.21 and 124.3, EPA has determined your application to be complete as ofthe date ofthis letter. Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Lisa Beckham at 415- 972-3811 or beckham.lisa~epa.gov. Sincerely,

~ Gerardo C. Chief, Pernii’ts Office

Mark Hajduk, APS (via email), Chas Spell, APS (via email), Raju Bisht, Navajo Nation EPA (via email) Tennille Begay, Navajo Nation EPA (via email)
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

Consent of Independent Auditors 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. File Nos. 333-54042, 333-45732, 333-39860, 333-36640, 333-36618,33-50860, 33-50862, 33-50864, 33-57734, 33-78804, 33-92312, 33-95288, 333-22631, 333-26857, 333-28745, 333-28675, 333-40671, 333-46259, 333-78553, 333-78551, 333-60764, 333-53705, 333-87984 and 333-53707) pertaining to various stock option plans ofePresence, Inc. of our report dated March 3, 2004, except for Note 1, Note 3 and Note 26, as to which the date is March 26, 2004, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ePresence, Inc. in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002, and 2001. 

 

 

/s/    Ernst & Young LLP 

 

March 26, 2004 

Boston, Massachusetts