alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

    <ARTICLE>                         5

    <S>                               <C>
    <PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
    <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-1999
    <PERIOD-START>                          JUL-01-1999
    <PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-1999
    <CASH>                                            0
    <SECURITIES>                                      0
    <RECEIVABLES>                                     0
    <ALLOWANCES>                                      0
    <INVENTORY>                                       0
    <CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0
    <PP&E>                                            0
    <DEPRECIATION>                                    0
    <TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    0
    <CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0
    <BONDS>                                           0
    <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0
    <PREFERRED>                                       0
    <COMMON>                                          0
    <OTHER-SE>                                   672769
    <TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      0
    <SALES>                                           0
    <TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  0
    <CGS>                                             0
    <TOTAL-COSTS>                                     0
    <OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  0
    <LOSS-PROVISION>                                  0
    <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                0
    <INCOME-PRETAX>                                   0
    <INCOME-TAX>                                      0
    <INCOME-CONTINUING>                               0
    <DISCONTINUED>                                    0
    <EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0
    <CHANGES>                                         0
    <NET-INCOME>                                      0
    <EPS-BASIC>                                     0
    <EPS-DILUTED>                                     0


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY, INC. CONTAINED IN ITS
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED FEBRUARY 28, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-1999
<CASH>                                           1,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,986
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,365
<INVENTORY>                                     52,045
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               123,054
<PP&E>                                          27,782
<DEPRECIATION>                                  14,793
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 162,489
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           30,154
<BONDS>                                         84,694
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            78
<OTHER-SE>                                      47,563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   162,489
<SALES>                                         91,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                91,531
<CGS>                                           61,789
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   61,789
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                22,966
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,233
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,476
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,656
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,820
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
AND CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                   1.00
<CASH>                                          20,692
<SECURITIES>                                   127,201
<RECEIVABLES>                                   63,083
<ALLOWANCES>                                     8,487
<INVENTORY>                                     47,467
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               163,791
<PP&E>                                          28,558
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,201
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 320,192
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,473
<BONDS>                                         90,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            88
<OTHER-SE>                                     174,341
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   320,192
<SALES>                                        264,075
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               264,075
<CGS>                                          165,385
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  118,874
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,345
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 2,591
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,180
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,190)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,707
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (22,897)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  2,791
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (20,106)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.76)
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 1, 2010 

Order 

 

December 1, 2010 

139769 & (60) 

DAN-KAI TUS and NU CHEN YEN TUS, 

Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants/ 

Appellants, 

 SC: 139769 

v COA: 281007 

Washtenaw CC: 06-000910-CH 

SHIRLEY HURT f/k/a SHIRLEY ROBBINS, 

Defendant-Cross Defendant, 

and 

STERLING MORTGAGE & INVESTMENT 

COMPANY, 

 Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff/Cross 

 Plaintiff/Appellee, 

and 

AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF 

WASHTENAW and REPUBLIC BANC 

MORTGAGE COMPANY, 

 Third-Party Defendants. 

_________________________________________ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation by counsel agreeing to the dismissal of 

the appeal is considered and the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
# CE2004084EN.01028501.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/285 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/285

---

(2004/C 84 E/0331)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4018/03

by Salvador Garriga Polledo (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(9 January 2004)

Subject:   Standardised use of the European flag on aircraft of EU airlines

Subject:

The circumstance that some airlines from EU Member States display the European flag on their aircraft while others do not has given rise to the most diverse interpretations by airport authorities in third countries. This, not surprisingly, generates considerable confusion over the symbolic dimension.

One might therefore think it logical that there should be Community legislation to standardise the use of the European flag as a symbol, on aircraft that belong to the same (European) community. The consensus among third-country airport authorities is that either the Community flag should be displayed by all aircraft from EU Member States, or none of them should have the right to use or display it.

Can the Commission state its position on standardisation? Does it believe legislation should be proposed on the matter, in order to ensure that the EU projects a unified corporate image in this respect?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(16 March 2004)

(16 March 2004)

The European emblem dates back to 1955 and is the ‘property’ of the Council of Europe. In 1979, the Council of Europe notified the emblem to the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) in Geneva. As a result, the emblem obtained protection in accordance with Article 6ter of the Paris Convention on the protection of industrial property.

Thus, any initiative to adopt Community legislation harmonising the use of the European emblem on aircrafts belonging to aircraft companieslocated in the Union would require the consensus of the Council of Europe.

With regard to the substance of the question, the Commission thinks that an initiative of the kind, as suggested by the Honourable Member, would require an in-depth prior assessment, notably involving the European air transport companies and competent national air transport authorities on the implications for the organization of air traffic, taking into account the legal framework of the Chicago Convention on international civil aviation.

The Commission is not aware of any practical problems arising for EU airlines in third countries due to the non-standardised use of the European flag.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                 EXHIBIT 23.1

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT

President Casinos, Inc.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-80024, 333-43907 and 333-71492 of President Casinos, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form S-8 of our report dated May 26, 2006 (which report expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs referring to the
Company's filing for Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code, substantial
doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern, and the sale
of the St. Louis, Missouri and Biloxi, Mississippi operations) appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of President Casinos, Inc. for the year ended
February 28, 2007.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche, LLP
--------------------------

St. Louis, Missouri
June 11, 2007
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation Nos. 701-TA-458 and 731-TA-1154 (Review)]

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year reviews, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the existing antidumping and countervailing duty orders on certain kitchen appliance shelving and racks from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to a U.S. industry producing refrigeration shelving and a U.S. industry producing oven racks within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted these reviews on August 1, 2014 (79 FR 44862) and determined on November 4, 2014 that it would conduct expedited reviews (79 FR 69525, November 21, 2014).

                    The Commission completed and filed its determinations in these reviews on February 24, 2015. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 4520 (February 2015), entitled                     *Certain Kitchen Appliance Shelving and Racks from China: Investigation Nos. 701-TA-458 and 731-TA-1154 (Review).*

Issued: February 24, 2015.

By order of the Commission.

Lisa R. Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-04114 Filed 2-26-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report for Epoch Holding Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), William W. Priest, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Adam Borak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of, and for, the periods presented in the Report.



|                  |  |     |  |                                                                                               
|----------------- |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2011 |  | By: |  | /S/ WILLIAM W. PRIEST 
William W. Priest Chief Executive
Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



|                  |  |     |  |                                                                                                
|----------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 5, 2011 |  | By: |  | /s/ ADAM BORAK 
Adam Borak Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Colonel B. 8. Pulling 

SWID trni:~, :Box 55 

lfavy 100 

7 lforth .A.udle;y Street 

London W.l.1 England 

Dear Bartl 

310 Second Street, S .:rt. 

Washington 31 D. c. 

20 August 195~ 

Thill Yill be a 1hort note to tell you ot 1f1¥ eat• &l"X'1val 

home atte:r &. very }'leaaant NA trane .. Atlantic t'Ught. 

I vaa, hQvever, much diaawointed in the tact that 111¥' 

•tutt tram Se:ttridae t • na not aboard the plane. l was 

more than disappointed, in tact quite annoyed, becaua~ l vent 

to the ~Uble of' nsakillg a apecial. visit to the Export Depart .. 

ment at Bettridge'• the rl1q' "be:rore l took ott, to uaure myse~ 

that they had everything laid on properl)". !rhey 18.id they had .. 

I llave initiated a tracer :tram. this end vith the 1'WA people 

and :QOY am vri ting to aak it you vould be good enough to have 

•omebod,y to go over to Bettridge'• and •tart a tracer from that 

end on. Export Card lf\lJllbQr JS 44567. 1'he package contained one 

ovorcoa.t 1 one eports jacket, three card1pns and. tour pail."a ot 

argyle 1ocks1 total value nwroximte]¥ $200. 

U" it we.a Bettridge'• t&ul.t that the atutt vu n.ot put 

aboard, I aha.ll expQct them to bear the cost or ahip.ment by air 

direct to me at 1J1¥ home a.&1l'\'las vhieh I quoted above. l sbe.ll be 

a'blo to get the atutt thro1J6b. U.S. cu.atoma OK becaueo l uclared 

it on '11I¥' t'om on &l"l"ival, for later cleliVe)!';Y. 

l have alreaey received fl'om Zug a receipt tor the flO I paid 

tor changing m;y air tl;'&vel tieket trom tourist to lat claS•· U' 

you need. it1 let :me know and I'll 1end it. to you. 

Please .let me thank 30u -ror th.et llllW.Y courtesies that :you and 

;your a1Uli&tants •hoved iae while I 1ft!UJ :tn London. 

lincere~, 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-17-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352\3
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1646 

To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to make a 

technical correction relating to the amendments made by Public Law 

113–243. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 23, 2015 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. BROWN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

to make a technical correction relating to the amendments made by Public Law 113–243. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Technical Clarification 

5 to Public Law 113–243 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TECHNICAL AMENDMENT RELATING TO ROLLOVER 

7 OF CERTAIN AIRLINE PAYMENT AMOUNTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1106(a) of the FAA Mod9 ernization and Reform Act of 2012 (26 U.S.C. 408 note) 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1646 IS

1 is amended by adding at the end the following new para2 graph: 

3 ‘‘(6) SPECIAL RULE FOR CERTAIN AIRLINE PAY4 MENT AMOUNTS.—In the case of any amount which 

5 became an airline payment amount by reason of the 

6 amendments made by section 1(b) of Public Law 

7 113–243 (26 U.S.C. 408 note), paragraph (1) shall 

8 be applied by substituting ‘(or, if later, within the 

9 period beginning on December 18, 2014, and ending 

10 on the date which is 180 days after the date of en11 actment of the Technical Clarification to Public Law 

12 113–243 Act of 2015)’ for ‘(or, if later, within 180 

13 days of the date of the enactment of this Act)’.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 this section shall take effect as if included in Public Law 

16 113–243 (26 U.S.C. 408 note). 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
99-926.

#### Christe v. GMS Mgt. Co.

Summit App. No. 18992. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed April 26, *14181999:

“Under R.C. Chapter 5321, shall attorneys’ fees be assessed as costs or awarded as damages?”

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Resnick, J., not participating.

The conflict case is *Breault v. Williamsburg*(Nov. 21, 1986), Lucas App. No. L-86-116, unreported, 1986 WL 13169.

*Sua sponte,*cause consolidated with 99-450, *infra.*

F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Resnick, J., not participating.
# 1)oL~t**:L.&~'i-e~ sr;;;**  

# City 

# ofAlpena

CITY HALL • 208 NORTH FIRST AVENUE • ALPENA, MICHIGAN 49707-2885 www.alpena. mi. us December 29,2011

Mr. Dennis DeVany Chief, Essential Air Service Division Office ofAviation Analysis US Department ofTransportation 1200 Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. DeVany: 1 r · ·. r ·1 

### :: < L

This letter is in response to the proposal received as a result of RFP Order 2011-11-20, for subsidized air service to Alpena County Regional Airport. The only proposal received was from Intrepid International Airlines, which does not currently have operating authority to provide scheduled passenger service; therefore Alpena is not interested in this proposal.

Mayor
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXA S
N O . P D - 0 8 1 0 - 1 9

R I C A R D O M A T A , A p p e l l a n t

v . T H E S T A T E O F T E X A S O R D E R R E G A R D I N G R E P R E S E N T A T I O N

H I D A L G O C O U N T Y

P e r c u r i a m . O R D E R Appellee was indicted for Ag g rava ted Kidnapping , Child Traf ficking and Sex ual Assault of

a Child in cause number CR-2611-16-B in the 93 District Court of Hidalg o County

. Appellee filed rd

a motion to suppress which was g rante d on J uly 11, 2017; the State of Texas appea led this order on J uly 31, 2017. The court of appea ls aff irmed in part insofar as it perta ins to the roadside statements, but reve rsed the judgme nt of t he trial court as to the writ t en statement. Mata v. State, No. 13-17- 00494-CR (Tex. App. —Corpus Christi, delivere d J uly 11, 2019). The State Prosecuting Attorney ’spetition for discretionar y revie w was g rante d by this Court on September 18, 2019. Appellee is entitled to repr esenta tion befor e this Court at t his time. See Article 1.051(a) (d)( 2), V.A.C.C.P. Appellee is without repr esenta tion in this Court. Acc ording ly , the trial court is order ed to deter mine if Appell ee is curr ently repr esente d by counsel, and if so, to inform this court who repr esents Appellee

. I f Appellee is not curr ently repr esente d by counsel and desires counsel, the trial court must first deter

mine whether Appellee is indige nt. I f the trial court finds Appellee is indige nt, that court shall appoint an at t o rney to repr esent Appellee befor e this court in reg ard to PDR No. PD0810-19, in acc ord with the provisi o n s o f Articles 1.051 and 26.04, V.A.C.C.P. Any hear ing conducte d pursua nt to this order shall be held within 30 day s of the date of this order

. The trial court' s order appointing counsel, any finding s of fac t, aff idavits, or transcr iption of the court repor ter' s notes and any other supplementation of the rec ord shall be returne d to this court within 45 day s of the date of this order. I T I S SO ORDERED THI S THE 15 DAY OF OCTOB ER, 2019 t h DO NOT PUBL I SH