alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Soar higher with NRO

NRO satellites provide global coverage, carry out research and development, and assist emergency and disaster relief efforts in the U.S. and around the world.

National Reconnaissance Office
Launch your CareerDo Business With Us- Home
- About
- Careers
- Launches
- Work With Us
- News & Media
- Resources

- facebook
- twitter
- youtube
- instagram
- linkedin

Contact Us

National Reconnaissance Office

                                  - facebook
                                  - twitter
                                  - youtube
                                  - instagram
                                  - linkedin
Contact Us

Who We Are                                  - Mission Partners & Customers
                                  - Our Leadership
                                  - A Declassified History

Careers                                  - Working at the NRO
                                  - Career Fields
                                  - Job Listings
                                  - Student Opportunities

Launches                                  - Missions
                                  - Launch Vehicles

Do Business With Us                                  - How To Do Business With Us
                                  - Director's Innovation Initiative
                                  - Acquisition Research Center

News & Media                                  - Featured Stories
                                  - Press Releases
                                  - Podcasts
                                  - Speeches and Testimony

Resources                                  - NRO Multimedia
                                  - Request a Speaker
                                  National Reconnaissance Office - Above and Beyond
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 14-10932

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 5:13-cr-00058-MTT-CHW-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JASON JAMES, 

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Georgia

________________________

(January 6, 2015)

Before WILLIAM PRYOR, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 

Jason James appeals his sentence of 51 months of imprisonment following 

his plea of guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. 18 U.S.C. 

Case: 14-10932 Date Filed: 01/06/2015 Page: 1 of 3 
2

§§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2). James argues that his sentence is unreasonable because 

the district court failed to consider the statutory sentencing factors before it ordered 

that his federal sentence run consecutively to his undischarged state sentence of 

five years of probation. We affirm.

James’s sentence is procedurally and substantively reasonable. The district 

court considered the presentence investigation report, the statutory sentencing 

factors, and James’s argument that his federal sentence should run concurrent with 

his state sentence. See 18 U.S.C. § 3584(a), (b); United States v. Scott, 426 F.3d 

1324, 1329–30 (11th Cir. 2005). The district court had the discretion to order that 

James’s federal sentence “run concurrently . . . or consecutively to the prior 

undischarged term of imprisonment to achieve a reasonable punishment for the 

instant offense,” United States Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5G1.3(c) (Nov. 

2013), and it reasonably determined that “there was no connection between” 

James’s possession of a firearm and an earlier offense of aggravated assault that 

would warrant allowing him to serve the sentences for those offenses concurrently.

See id. cmt. n.3(A). The explanation provided by the district court reveals that it 

considered James’s background and history and the need for his sentence to 

provide just punishment for his illegal possession of a firearm, to promote respect 

for the law, and to deter him from committing further similar crimes. See 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3553(a). And the district court sentenced James within his advisory guideline 

Case: 14-10932 Date Filed: 01/06/2015 Page: 2 of 3 
3

range of 46 to 57 months of imprisonment, which we consider to be reasonable. 

United States v. Hunt, 526 F.3d 739, 746 (11th Cir. 2008). The district court did 

not abuse its discretion when it ordered James to serve his 51 month sentence 

consecutive to his state sentence of probation. 

AFFIRMED.

Case: 14-10932 Date Filed: 01/06/2015 Page: 3 of 3
#### The State ex rel. Johnson, Appellant, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *State ex rel. Johnson v. Indus. Comm.*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 381.]

(No. 98-2220

Submitted June 22, 1999

Decided September 8, 1999.)

*382*Law Office of Thomas Tootle*and *Thomas Tootle,*for appellant.

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *Thomas W. Atzberger,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission.

*Hanlon, Duff, Paleudis & Estadt Co., L.P.A.,*and *John G. Paleudis,*for appellee Quarto Mining Company.

*Garvin & Hickey, L.L.C.,*and *Michael J. Hickey,*for appellee North American Coal.

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

F.E. Sweeney, J., dissents.
#### Toledo Bar Association *v.*Viren.

[Cite as *Toledo Bar Assn. v. Viren*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 1204.]

(No. DD 86-14

Submitted June 9, 1999

Decided June 29, 1999.)

*1206For earlier case, see *Toledo Bar Assn. v. Viren*(1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 200, 25 OBR 264, 496 N.E.2d 243.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
e•m• 

11r. l1n el c~, Cl.a ...... laboami .... ..... ~ .. Ca.l"9e 

a. c..ttoJ. ~D.C: • 

.Dier ..... ~7: 

REF ID:A44342 - - - ---·------

-.s.i: N 0859 

AttacW 1a the ....... , illfcl'atica ........ 1-7 tbe 8abac •ttee 

- 1 M9nb 19'1. 

Ulclo9ure. 

•:~-

cc: DIR·. 

AG 

PROD 

SERV 

Reading File 

COMP-4 

COMP-01 

COMP-03 

M/R: This data is provided to the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee 

of the House as the result of a request made during the subcommittee 

hearing on the NSA FY 1962 Budget. .fW 

,. /. 

(..; 

O. D. WII.SON/COl{p-4/3181/8 Mar 61/dpt 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-21-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

. - : ?............ ,. ;', .• · .. 

........ ·.,:4.,. ..... 1=, '·.:,.,:' ~·)'i", .... : ~ .. c.,.,.~:,:lf ·:,::. ;.ti '.!if '.0.'1·,:"•",UI. 
REF ID:A44342 

"Vice Pttaidte't Jf1SOQ point• out tl:at tM .._..,epe st1ll aw 

not preMnted ott1c1al proof to ~rt tM1r cla1a ot cruA--JewMnc 

a rocket oe the .:>0a. BSOll told. new in. lew York City lut ll1(lllt. 

that none of u.e ~ kDov t!at it i• ca tM mam • 

. , (Mixon ai.o told DIN a that tlde latut 1'lff1 an space G:Jlo1 t --

in hi•~ -- 1•~ to pt~ al:iatt'. He.,.,. ..... tlat t1eimtif'ioall.7 ul ell'Oat:S.ane11F1 wen wll 9bM4. o'f tm leri.et•· 

!lut 

t.ha7're 

he poiitted. 

~ ••• 

out UM 

llllt ~ 

ia •lance, 

onr-an, 

.-ts.-

nan 

we're 

.n-4.) 

.-.0. .... ~ 

"{'l'be Vice rr..14-t aleo di tel.Jo•• ~t tDe P.Lla81.mla ball triel 

am. tailed 3 ttm. .ta the lut a ""1t• to leD4 a roe.kilt on ti.a lll)QQ. 

Be aid. Saturdq'a -"empt WU tba i.,tl:l • • • &D4 ~ti)' it WM 

aicceutul. )" 

(PAGB 2155 oS CIABSIFIKD TlWISCRIPl') 
REF ID:A44342 

---------··-

~ ----OV IW'Wi C~ - ______....___ c.RD101.0QIC ll&JGJI! ~ --·-

( 6o1laJ'a 1.a za1 l lt .... ) 

2. .AJta' ~ lifil'n' AGDCl ( .l8A) : 

~ 

~ation & ~., AZVS¥ 

taewl.cJ a, Test & ~toe. AnJY 

TO'!lL MA 

3• AIIC]' SJilNAL ~ ~UR!Tf NJIJJC'Y (J\&CU.) I 

~&~,An:q 

'l\JTAL ASCSA 

~. BYAL swunn c IOUP ( .DG) 1 

~an & S'iaint~ ?ia"Q' 

QtM:r ~, kt)' 

JiUlltary eon..maetioe, ...,.. 

TOTAL Bl 

5. AI.ft J'OJCt. aiCLall!'t e:EHYICI! (AFSS}: 

!!t1.lttal'J' ... • •) , Air i'azwe f ' ': ~ ) 

1'111 

~ 

ez ve Per80lllM1., A.11" ~ 

6 -.JRtrrrsce, Air Vorce 

~ ~, 417 ?oiNe 

NUi~ ~ Air t'orce 

'lUrAL .U"IS 

~ 89.4 

~·l 

$ ,3..1. •• 

l·-

i l~.2_ 

$ 5.9 

16.8 

2.0 --~. ---

$ 7.5 

.l 

Tf ·1 

'1.0 

.a 

• ~.7 

,-.. a 

14.2 

!A.7 

23·\ 

• 291.5 

*lion:: '!'be ~· llbowa. 1.ncl.ude e.-t'mete.a oeJ.,J ft.- u.o.e t\Me to 1;)e _.. 

di.ftat.l,y ~)able to tlw erntolo&ica Ac• IC1M in INpp01't ot aie&lON 

whice 

~ 

are c. tldA tat prr11cv o~ tbit ~, htion&l hcWit, JtctaMJ. 

aoaa b' lllllteey pc ... nel, oo m1eai1~, ~ llillll 

~. ~ 11!14 ~ nptr-•t. J8'0'f1.MI to tbe 

Cr,p>l~c A.poei .. ~ ~ ..-CiW .... oi w't aa • E*l-n19Aruh'• 

ba&i• an not iael:aht. 

'1be 4o1 tar .t:f •aes f'fr tbc zwtiaaa.l leclu:r1 tJ ~ nflAcrt the _.mta 

iDcW. 1a tba ~'• :sudg9t; otl:m' ~ x••• a\ tbt ..-:1Mft1 

.. ~~ to ml b7 Ula MU.itar1 ~· ia Oct4Mr l~. 

(PAalt W.2 of CViS!llYIBD TMmCnn)
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0259

SAT Date: 2/15/2013

Print Date: 7/2/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3 Health: ; Eco: based on measured value for (nearly iden

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: MUTA, IRR-MM,E, UNCERT-ONCO, NEURO, AQUATOX-C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0259

FATE: 

S < 1 mg/L at 25 C (Analogs)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and possible partial biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong
PBT Potential: P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin and poor through the 

lungs and GI tract based on physical/chemical properties. Expect poor hydrolysis in the stomach 

with poor release of By analogy to there is low 

concern for acute toxicity (oral and dermal routes LD50 = 16 g/kg), systemic effects, and 

reproductive/developmental toxicity. The analog has a NOEL of 1000 mg/kg in a combined 

repeated dose/reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test (EPA Hazard Characterization 

Document, March 2011). This analog is positive in an ip mouse micronucleus assay. The PMN 

material is expected to be irritating to mucous membranes and there is uncertain concern for 

oncogenicity based on the positive result in the micronucleus assay and possible release of 

in the stomach. There is also some concern for neurotoxicity based on possible release of 

and by analogy to which caused inhibition of brain esterase at 520 

ppm in a 90-day dietary neurotoxicity study in rats with a NOEL of 207 ppm (8e-12806). Low 

moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 *

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

* 0.035

nearly identical

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for 

 Stable @ pH 7; MW 822; with unknown mp (P); S < 0.001 g/L (P); 

pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and measured concentrations; 

hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

4

SARs

SAR Class
Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
REF ID:A65707 

e 

USCIB: 13.8/16 

10 May 1954 

MEM:>RANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB 

Subject: 

References: 

"Declassification of Document 

(a) USCIB 5.4/2 dated 19 October 1953 

(b) USCIB 13.S/7 dated 3 December 1953 

1. The classification of the attachment to the enclosure 

with reference (a) is herewith downgraded from RESTRICTED to 

UNCLASSIFIED in accordance with NSG Memo dated 4 May 1954, 

subject, "Concept of the National Security Council and Its 

Advisory and Subordinate Groups", which states as follows: 

"In accordance with Executive Order 10501 on 'Safeguarding Official In:f ormation in the Interests of the Defense of 

the United States 1 dated November 6, 1953, the subject memorandum which is presently classified 'Restricted - Security Inform.ation1 , is hereby declassified." 

2. Reference (a) may be downgraded from CONFIDENTIAL to 

USCIB: 13. 8/16 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-21-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

24
REF ID: A43~·Pt-----------

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 

MEMORANWM FOR THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 

(Installations and Logistics) 

Serial.: 

SUBJ.IOOT: Proposed Addition to the Armed Services Procurement 

Regulation(U) 

N 1519 

15 MAY 1981 

1. In accordance with instructions contained in USCSB Memorandum, CCJ4Sl00 13-/13, Blbject: Policy on Use of Cryptomaterial 

by Commercial Contractors, dated 16 February 1961, the guidance 

in paragraph 2 is proposed. for inclusion in the Armed Services 

Procurement Regulation (ASPR) in an appropriate location. 

2. United States commercial. contractors engaged in work on 

classified U. S. Government projects J1l8\V' be authorized, and should 

be encouraged, to use certain cryptosystems tor the encryption ot 

classified information. To the extent that there shall be no 

interference with the normal. supply of cryptomaterial to the 

departments and agencies of the Government, these contractors :mq 

also be authorized to use these cryptosystems at their discretion 

for encryption of defense-related information for which security 

is required.. Use of cryptomaterial mq- be authorized. for encryption of coJIDllUnications between contractors and the Government, 

between contractors, between various facilities of a contractor, 

and between contractors and subcontractors. The appropriate 

authorities of the contracting govermnent department or agency 

which authorize the use of the cryptosystem by the contractor 

shall specify the categories of classified information that ID8'3' 

be encrypted, and shall insure that procedures are established 

to provide·for the physical safeguarding of cryptomateriel.s and 

for.the secure and efficient operation of cryptosystems. 

3. The proposed guidance has been discussed informel.ly with 

Mr. A. Carter, Secretary to the ASPR Conmittee. Further information about the proposal may be obtained by telephon Mr. Philip 

W. Ide, Extension 6o677. 

Copy FUrnished: 

General G. B. Erskine, US]IJ.C-Ret, 

Asst to SecDef, Sp Opns 

Vice Admiral, USN 

Director 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 10-08-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
cc: DIR...... -~· 

AG 

Reading File 

BIGPO 

OPS 

LOG 

R/D 

· CSEC 

CSEC.:.011 

CBEC-04 

CSEC-05 

ENG 

MAT 

DOC-11 Subj File Copy 

DOC-11 ~ File Cop;y 

DOC-11 Comeback Capt 

REF ID:A43538 

• 

Serial: N 1519 

M/R: '!be USCSB paper Ca.fSEC 13-/131 subject: Release of Cryptomaterial to Commercial. Contractors, dated 16 February 19611 placed 

a requirement on OSD and NBA members to prepare, on the basis of 

the policy contained in the paper, the necessary guidance to assure 

inclusion of a proper statement in ASPR. 'Ibis has been disuussed 

with Mr. A. Carter, secretary of the ASPR committee who suggested 

the above channel as the best means of bringing the proposed chaiige 

before the ASPR comm! ttee. '!his has a.tao been discussed with Mr • 

M. M1rpby1 CSF.C-04, Mr. F. J McNeeley, CSEC-051 Mrs. Betty Simpson, 

LOG~61 and Mr. Frank Hardie, SIGPO. , n ~ 

~9f.'~ 

Mr. P.w. Ide/noc-11/2536st/ 27 Apr 61/M 

2
) 

~ -----==------

?-n:utr- - f~ ~, )k~ 6.Q.k.J. <AcrL_ 

----=W--=--~ ~ kd--=-~~ lAnk-h ... 'b1~ 

\8.u .al ZJ-<>.A-" .;;t,al::,,_ ~~-~~~-=---1'~V~~~~~~~~~~~-I-~· 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 12-08-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

\ 

\ 

'
-- -- _, 

REF ID:A66303 

Ml:'. .John e. MCP"'.uereon 

Vice l"res idient 

&er1sJ.: f I ~ 

I 2 F4-<r- 1 qs 4 

lAtex wtiooa.1 lwf inesa Machi.M1J Corp. 

S'.90 ~ A'VflllU& 

Sew tOl'k S!e, lew To:tk 

1'leC" lb".. Mci"bil: oon: 

Attar eouhI rillg Vi th Dr• Cl.Urns, Cbd:r=.n of tl1e 

Jlational. Seeurley ~ Sdent.U'ic Advi.a=7 JkMrd (ISW..B), 

ar .. ~n, N1lll Qr. vuu,, it ll'OW.d. ~that the JilCISt 

....a. 

Ritab14! 

~adG¥ 

Ga.tee tor tile 1l9Xt ~ -tiDc vould be ~ 

1 !f>.41 •U .1951;. • 

ft. .e;eu~a tor the ..-ti'QS ..ui prdbe.b~ \le eeat to 

J'W later. At thU tim, kmrvu, X would eppreeiate '1fNr 

"4Ya.tng • ot -.q item JOU would. lib placed on th& ~n. 

1 -.e =reu vUl f'1n4 ~ in pe1iUon to ~ tM> ~ -\iQG ~- ~tcy upon receipt. at attirzaative illtm~ 

m$1on, l v1U lie &lad to Mnd. 10'.t tra:vel crrd.e:ra, tt requ12"ed. 

cc:: NJ 

c/s 

S/ASST (Mr. W.1.Friedmn 

11.ncere~, 

vn.t.lAM , • J'Rim'lA.S 

8M;cut1..-~ 

mA 8eient1t1c Ahillol7 Jloar4 

M/R: Invitation to 20-21 Apri1 1954 NS.ABA:B Meeting. 

M.M.Felerski,S/ASST/6o493/10 Feb 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-24-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
Exhibit32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection withthe Annual Report on Form 10-K of Revlon, Inc. (the"Company") for the period ended December 31,2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the "Report"), I, Jack L. Stahl,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

/s/ Jack L.Stahl                 Jack L. StahlChiefExecutive OfficerMarch 10, 2005

----
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                            AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of President Casinos, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending February 28, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
John S. Aylsworth, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.

Date: June 12, 2007                  /s/ John S. Aylsworth
                                    ---------------------------
                                     John S. Aylsworth
                                     Chief Executive Officer of
                                     President Casinos, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                    6,466
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                            12,952
<ALLOWANCES>                                200
<INVENTORY>                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         24,104
<PP&E>                                    1,958
<DEPRECIATION>                            1,584
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           28,230
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    16,281
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                     54
<OTHER-SE>                               11,840
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             28,230
<SALES>                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         26,885
<CGS>                                    23,258
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            25,589
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           13
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           1,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                584
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         699
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                699
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.13)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.12)


</TABLE>
Filed 12/7/17 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2017 ND 276

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee

v.

Miguel Angel Rodriguez De La Cruz, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20170207

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable John C. Irby, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Leah J. Viste, Assistant State’s Attorney, Fargo, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.

Nicholas D. Thornton and James A. Teigland, Fargo, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. De La Cruz

No. 20170207

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Miguel Angel Rodriguez De La Cruz appealed from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of patronizing a minor for commercial sexual activity. On appeal, De La Cruz argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude the State presented sufficient evidence and summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Jon J. Jensen

Jerod E. Tufte

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers