alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      16,409,420
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            16,409,420
<PP&E>                                      10,930,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              27,339,953
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,545
<BONDS>                                      1,033,108
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,151,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                27,339,953
<SALES>                                        763,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,120,830
<CGS>                                          189,826
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  189,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               122,816
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,808,188
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,808,188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,808,188
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    89.60
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    89.60
        

</TABLE>
REF ID:A64673 

Mr. John v. Dod.go Managing Editor ~clopeadia !r1tnzmia 

425 lorth Micltlg&n Avenue 

Chiaago 111 Xllinoi1 

Dear Mr. Dodge l 

310 Seco.n4 Street-'. S ._E. 

Waahington 31 l>. c. 

l Octo'bin- 1954 

I u ind.eed P"&tcttul tor )'"OUr telegram. ot 30 September, 

1n vhich you extend the 4.eadline tor 1Jf¥ uticlt!J COllF.$ AID 

WH£RB h'om 15 October to 15 Jfove.mber. 

~ extension, I teel.1 ahould certainly 'be auttic:ient 

to meet rq needs. 

'n1a.nldng you agail1, 1 ... 

lillcare4', 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-17-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

i
PHOTO INFORMATION

** Download

** Details

** Share

# D-21 Declassified: NRO Technology Ahead of its Time Finds a New Home

By StaffNational Reconnaissance Office

                BIRMINGHAM, Ala.  –              
Stealthy, sleek, able to fly at speeds over Mach 3.3 at an altitude of over 90,000 feet, the NRO’s D-21 drone, 1960’s technology ahead of its time, landed in a new home at the Southern Museum of Flight (SMF) here.

On March 21, 2019, the Museum hosted historians from NRO’s Center for the Study of Reconnaissance (CSNR) in an event about the D-21 drone that was recently unveiled in the museum’s new Cold War wing. The reconnaissance drone is on long-term loan to the SMF from NRO. The event coincided with the release of 97 recently declassified NRO documents about the drone program.  The D-21 foreshadowed the unpiloted aircraft of the 21st century everyone is familiar with today.  The drone was carried and launched from a modified A-12 CIA high-performance reconnaissance aircraft and then later from a modified USAF B-52.  Born of the Cold War, it tested the limits of technology available in the time period as a way of collecting reconnaissance imagery over denied territory.

Dr. James Outzen, D/CSNR, Director Emeritus Dr. Robert McDonald, Senior Curator

Trisha Aquintey, Chief Research Officer Patrick Widlake and others spoke on various aspects of the D-21 drone, from its place in reconnaissance history to the legacy of the artifact.

Dr. Outzen and Mr. Widlake also gave a presentation about the history of the D-21, and it’s role as the predecessor of the drones we know today, to a group of 80 second graders visiting the museum. When asked if any one of them owned a drone, the speakers were amazed when approximately half the children excitedly raised their hands and told stories of taking pictures with their drone or just flying them around their neighborhoods.

Though the D-21 program was cancelled in 1971, it was a bold technology for its time and its influence is evident in later technology used in NRO, Air Force and NASA vehicles, military drones, and even the drones used by second graders.

**                    SHARE                

**                    PRINT                

2019Intelligence CommunityIntelligencereconnaissance
\ 

\ 

REF ID:A275384 

22nd July, 1942. 

My dear Friedman, 

I am taking advantage of Kulback' s return 

to send you a few lines of greeting. I am sure 

his visit is of great service to both of us. 

Speaking !or the D1plomat1c Sections only, he 

now knows what all of us are doing and has seen 

weak points in the liaison in the case of the Fr~nch _and South American, and will, I hope, take 

steps on his return to clear up aey misunderst8nimgs. I consider that in Japanese, Gerrnan and Italian 

we are now walking in step, and I hope soon to see 

the other subjects equally efficient. 

It will then be the time for you to come 

over and put the final touches on what I hope will 

be a record in international cooperation. 

I hope to have Colonel Hayes down at my home for the weekend and to introduce him to my golf course, ..vh1ch is knmm in these parts as a 

goat track, as it entails a certain amount of 

mounta1neer1ng. 

Please give my sincere greetings to 

:W.rs. Freid.man. 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-15-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
.... 

---

REF ID:A43811 

PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

E0.3.3(h) (2) 

.C.Jltm, ~~ a.111~ ~ 

1_18S 

WBJJni ~ ...... __________ ___.)~ {SGS) 

i. ft1Mk soa tor 'IOU ~a, afJCJJD/'J(l6p., da'M4 2l. Jlllfta l;J6l. 

twr Obeen•laa u to t.u flK1PI of "- d1"11981eu 1• -.;,pree1a"94 Ud 

np.'11._tat.iv•• -er- aU. ~t.a ~ 'IU.Y1-1ou v.1.U be lfel.t:atje. 

~• tbaU alto v'S.ldl to 1aolllile l'epn._ta'Un• fl'a 41ft"eral ort2.eea 

=-t.na cat&ln ~ ot tae 41MUaa1~. 

2. !' 1• waa:enect ~~tu ~r.m al a mare Q.etail.M a&Mda 

:.... a.. IBQS'f 

·11c• AdatftJ., 

~ 

Ji3I 

cc: DIR - ---·- -· --.: 

NJ 

Bea41ng J'1le 

OPS 

PROD (6): PBOD-03, PBOD-oli.l (~, AINA, !BOD...001 

S"'-.5 .... :i.1.J 

M/B: D/8o80/3o6/2 contaiu OCllQ acceptance o'L .ISi. 1-itation to hold 

•ubJect 41scuaa1aa.a at EA d.uriDg mid-JUDe 1961. ~e reference al•o state• 

11i 11&1' be de•1rable t~ GCBQ to •end repreRDtatiTe• fraa 8tiller GCllQ 41Yiaions 

u.d tb&'t there ..,. be lim. t&Uon• OD the extent to which 'theae repreaea•tive• 

could speak tor GCllQ 011 11CJ1M of the agenda 1 tau. Concurred 1D 'b7 IJNA. 

(Rr. llaraton), PROD-03 (Jin. Budenbach), A/Dm SOD (Jlr. BaYeD) &Del OPS (Mr. 

Price). 

Julia Vard/ftoD-o41/'+3tJam/10 kJ1r ,61/RdJ 

----...:.·...:.·:...:· .. ~~:...:.i.·· _,_, '. . : ) - .. r ... l :i 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-10-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
~-~-~---=--~-~--=---=--=----::---=~ ........... ~------------------------------ REF ID:A65708 

SW" .lrl.bur t.. lentel ~c te:boraW:rice 

Jtla.nt fe. 

Interna.tionnl ~ine•s Mll.chimts Corp. ~aie, .,.. Yark 

lllur !lr. &uau.l t 

!it\1• i• to ac~le~ ~1Pt or 10U1" ~o at 

the itrrltation to rlait tho lati~ Becur1t,y Apncy ff# 

tM 20-21 ~ '1o1nt hzlel naetUlg9. 

:rt you will flu tc arrive at 3801 hbra11ca Avenu'l, 

\kuJ~t:n1 .. t 8i45 •·•· on 20 th)' 1 w Ylll ho.ve SO.'lliloM 

•t the ptehouae W ~ JOU• 

X • inclOtJ11'5 eogtea ot .,~ t.l'aVel OZ'd.ers D1. a 

~ortatJ.on ftqu98t tor~ trip ie. &CC<>t"4H1"'~ vtth 

JOtti" 'atuhea. n.o 1.QC! l¢Md tfY1' )"OUr e~e-ace 1a u. 

tnatru.ction •~t vith t...~ requiN~ to.nae eo t..l\at pi 197 

rtcoint CQ:C>enaation tar ~ MrV1ce8 u 1U"O'l1Pt1Y u 

J(ala!ble ~ their CODPletion· 

' !J.l' 

1lIJ.L.'W1 , • ft'UtWJ 

Zmt'!U\1 TI> Sec:rat .. 'l.%1 

laA 8oi.utit1o M.YUory brd 

cc: NJ - / ... M/i: Acknowledging receipt or Dr.. Samuel•• 

C/8 :--· acceptance to 20-21 :tiny Joint Po.nel Meetings. 

S/N3ST (Mr. Friedlmn) Aao incJ.osing •ll neceesary ~rs/ T/R, 

and rorms in connection with visit. 

@'pproved for Release by t:JS~ on 07-23-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352a
Order entered May 23, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-17-00289-CR

LEONARD MORNES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1575949-S

ORDER

Appellant’s May 21, 2018 motion to extend the time for filing a reply brief is 

GRANTED. Appellant’s reply brief, received on May 17, 2018, is ORDERED filed as of the 

date of this order.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

PRESIDING JUSTICE
99-363.

#### State v. Fautenberry.

Hamilton App. No. C-971017. Reported at 85 Ohio St.3d 1477, 709 N.E.2d 849. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
Jib'. Jonu c. Mcl'beraon 

'le• h"esid.ent 

~1&11 ~/ 87 

1 3 APR 1954 

htvnat1Ql)O.l. ~tneu Wachb\ea Ccnpo¥"-a.tiou 

'90 *4190!1 Avenue 

lev ?ark 12, lew YOX'k 

Dear John.J 

In~ to our p.l&l:med activiti.e• tor the Puel.9 

ot tblt lattonal. Se®rity JcenCY So1ent1tic Mvieor¥ loud, 

I am inclOdina tC# )'OUl" intonation ae.qtle eq1iea ot the 

letter• Mnt to ~Panel melliben Who have been invited 

tor ~ moetaca on both 20 &).ld 21 May and to those lfho 

be.VG Meil invited oul)' tar 21 Ma)r • 

It a hoped that you, u Cha.inm.n or tl:Mrt &J.actro.nie• 

Pa.nftl, vill :tim youra.elt 1.n pt»ition to particS.,..te 11l 

the aetivitie• an both ao alld. al Ma.y. 

S~cerely, 

WllJJ.AM ,. • l':Rl:El»Utlf 

.becutive seeretaey 

EA Scientitic Advi•o:rt Board 

2 lnc1ht 

I 

1. ~le cq>y at letter ffnt to ~l ~ tor 

l!0·2l Ma)' meet~. 

I. ltulple ccipy Qt JAt.ter Mnt to 7aael .-bera tor 

ll. ....,. .-till&. 

cc; Ml 

c/s s/ ASST (Mr. Fried.:ioo.n) 

.M/R: In a recent visit to the NSA, Mr. McPherson participated 

in the pJannjng of Panel activities. Letter content eelt 

explanatory. 

M.M.leJ.erski/S/ASST/6o493/9 lipr 54 

~- -

~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~--........... 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7079
CURTIS WATERS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus T. H. SUMMER; NEWBERRY COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-1976-3-17-BC) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 21, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Curtis Waters, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Gary Tusten Pope, POPE & HUDGENS, P.A., Newberry, South Carolina; Vinton DeVane Lide, LIDE, MONTGOMERY, POTTS & MEDLOCK, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Waters v. Summer , No. CA-94-1976-3-17-BC (D.S.C. June 26, 1995). We dispense withoral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
-- -----

REF ID:A65290 

310 Second Street, S.K. 

lluhington ! 1 D. c. 

Prote•aor Charles T. Prouty 

Department or Engliah 

Yale Univereity Jlev Haven, Connecticut 

Dear Prof. Prouty1 

9 June 1954 

I am much indebted to you tor 7our •econd gitt cogy of 

A liundreth SWllb:-1• l"lowre•· 

I note )'our very iluainati?Jg remarks on the •ubject ~ 

the Pa.y ''MoritUJl pat&:re, o.-ave" and oths:r co=ant• Which 

V1ll bo balptul. 

Again t.hanld ng ;you tor your ld n4ne••, I a, 

Sincarel,y yours, 

WILLIAM F. FRIEDMAlf 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-18-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

• 

~ 

-

-

:;; 

~ fl 

--

... ""' 

~ ~ 

~ 

~ 

-

~ 

---=--
... 

. / 

f 

• 

• 

• 

• 

REF ID:A66339-

BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES 

INCORPORATED 

TO: 

RECEIPT FOR CLASSIFIED MATERIAL <FORMAL> 

Lt. General Ralph J. Canine 

Director 

National Security Agency Washington 25, D.C. 

FRO~. Ralph K. Pott~r, Director 

Transmission Research 

Bell Telephone Laboratories, I~o 

Murray Hill, New Jersey 

DATE TRANSMITTED 

I 

TRANSMITTED VIA 

1 

POSTAL REG1701 NO. 

January 21, 1954 u.s.Mail 

INSTRUCTIONS: 

CL.ASS. 

(NOTE A) 

c 

c 

J, 1ST COPY OF THIS RECEIPT TO BE SIGNED PERSONALLY BY RECIPIENT AND RETURNED TO SENDER. 

2. 2ND COPY TO BE RETAINED BY RECIPIENT ADDRESSED • 

3. 3RD COPY TO BE RETAINED BY SENDER FOR FOLLOW-UP FILE 

4. 4TH COPY TO BE COMPLETED WHEN TOP SECRET OR SECRET DOCUMENTS ARE TRANSMITTED AND 

FORWARDED TO APPROPRIATE CONTROL STATION 

5. AVOID IDENTIFYING MATERIAL BELOW IN ANY WAY THAT MIGHT NECESSITATE CLASSIFICATION 

OF THIS FORM. 

DOCUMENT 

TYPE (NOTE 8) 

Let. 

SO and 

ac. 

NO OF 

PAGES 

1 

NSA 4 

Reg. 

No.11-3 

DATED 

DESCRIPTION 

FROM 

(NOTE C) 

TO 

(NOTE C) 

1/2~~ R.K.Potter Lt.Gen. Canine 

1/22,V53 

CONTROL NUMBER 

11\ooroved for Release bv NSA on 07-24-2014 oursuantto E.O. 1352CJ 

CERTIFICATE 

I HAVE PERSONALLY RECEIVED FROM THE SENDER THE MATERIAL. INCLUDING ENCLOSURES AND 

ATTACHMENTS, AS IDENTIFIED ABOVE. I ASSUME RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SAFE HANDLING, STORAGE AND 

TRANSMITTAL ELSEWHERE OF THIS MATERIAL IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH EXISTING REGULATIONS. 

RECEIVED BY (SIGNATURE) 

I 

NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) I DATE RECEIVED 

~.;HO - . RALPli_J. OM!I~- . llJM1tN 

NOTE A 

B - INDICATE WHETHER "LET" !LETTER), "RPT" !REPORT), "P" (PHOTOGRAPH!, "PN" !PHOTO-NEGATIVE>: ALSO INDICATE 

IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS, IF ANY, AND WHETHER "SO" {SIGNED ORIGINAL!, "CC" !CARBON COPY!, "Tc" (TYPED 

COPY), "PC'' (PRINTED COPY-MIMEOGRAPH, HECTOGRAPH, PHOTOSTAT, ETC.I. 

INDICATE WHETHER "OT" CDRAWING-TRACINGJ, "DTR" (DRAWING-TRANSPARENCY), "DVD" <DRAWING-VAN 

DYKE!, "ON" <DRAWING-CAMERA NEGATIVE), "DPB" !DRAWING-BLUE PRINT>. "DP" DRAWING-OFFSET PRINT).
Exhibit
      32.1








**Certification
      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,**


**18
      U.S.C. Section 1350**









I,
      Alexander von Welczeck, President and Chief Executive Officer of friendlyway
      Corporation (the “Corporation”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, to my knowledge that:




1.
      the
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Corporation for the fiscal year ended
      October 31, 2005 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date:
      March 8, 2006




By:
            /s/ Alexander
              von
              WelczeckAlexander
                von WelczeckPresident
                and Chief Executive Officer
# CE2004088EN.01054901.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/549 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/549

---

(2004/C 88 E/0559)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0899/04

by Patricia McKenna (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(24 March 2004)

Subject:   Larger Member State representation on the ECB board

Subject:

Will the Commission comment on recent allegations in the Financial Times (8 March 2004) which claim that Germany, Italy France and Spain are attempting to set a precedent for larger Member States to always have representation on the European Central Bank's six-member board? Could such a situation ever be allowed to occur? And if so, under what circumstances?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(23 April 2004)

(23 April 2004)

The rules and the procedure for the appointment of the members of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank (ECB) are laid down in Article 112(2)(b) EC as well as in Article 11 (2) of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank. The decision is taken by common accord (i.e. unanimity without abstention) of the governments of the Member States at the level of Heads of State or Government. The decision is based on a recommendation from the Council, while both the European Parliament and the Governing Council of the ECB are consulted. It should be noted that only the Member States belonging to the euro area are entitled to take part in the relevant decisions of the Council and the Governments according to Article 122(4) of the EC Treaty.

The EC Treaty imposes two requirements for the selection of the members of the Executive Board. Firstly, they shall be appointed from among persons of recognised standing and professional experience in monetary and banking matters. Secondly, they shall be nationals of participating Member States. The members of the Executive Board moreover act in a personal capacity as opposed to acting as representatives of their country of origin. Any notion of representation of Member States would therefore not be in line with the rules and principles governing the appointment of the members of the Executive Board.

---
REF ID:A67664 

fitrtala 

Proteaaor John wn leua.um. 

Tho I.astd. tut.e tor Advanced 5t\ld7 

Prl.JJOeton Uni TN":d. V 

Pn.noeton, IP Jerff¥ 

Dear P.rotuaor Ton lleurumt1 

?our letter at S Janu.ary 19$) accept.f.ng th9 imit&tJ.on. 

ntended in IQ' let.t.er.i ol ll t!Gcetmbel" l.9S2 1• a IOUl'Ce ot 

aratif'icat.i.on. 

Ve had contemplated holding tho tii-st, aaeU.ug or \!lo JUr'1' 

Boa.rd on 26 Janue:t.71 u 1ntU.oatod in 'lff7 letter, bu.t t.h1s date 

has provod to bo qsu1 table &rd 1h• moeti~ bu been po•tfJOried 

to tha .til'at vecak in PebN&l"1'• A let.tar on thi.s nbjeot. will 

be •cut 10u in a ltl'.1 d_,.. 

I too a.a look1ns toivard to aee1ng 101.1 again at. ou.it:i.l'at aoet1ng. 

COi AG 

c/s 

OONS 

MLPB J. CB.ID 

Jlajo"' ac .. .i, tl9 ;,.wq 

J'l.S.r8fJ tor 

II/Ra In our letter, aer. 0795, dtd ll Dec S2 we invited Prof. 

von Heumann to be a monber of HSASAB. Pro.t. von Neumarm accepted 

in his letter ot S Jan S3. 

w. F • .Frledl'llan/OOHS/60493/9 Jan S3 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-30-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
# CE2004088EN.01072402.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/724 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/724

---

(2004/C 88 E/0745)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-1190/04

by Joan Vallvé (ELDR) to the Commission

(14 April 2004)

Subject:   Forum of Cultures 2004

Subject:

In its answer of 21 October 2003 to my question on the Forum of Cultures (H-0539/03 (1)), which will formally open in Barcelona on 9 May 2004, the Commission stated that it was keeping track of the preparations for the Forum and implementing a series of initiatives aimed at fostering intercultural dialogue.

1

Since the opening of the Forum is approaching, I would like to know what initiatives the Commission intends to implement. I should also like to know whether the intercultural dialogue referred to will take into account the specific cultural characteristics of Catalonia, and more particularly the Catalan language, which is an official Forum language.

Answer given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

The Commission recently presented the outline of the future new-generation programme on culture, in its Communication on citizenship in action. It proposes to focus on promoting the dialogue between cultures in this future programme, as the contribution to this dialogue is one of the main benefits offered by cultural action at Community level.

With regard to the Forum to be held in Barcelona from May to September 2004, the Commission can only reiterate that it will follow the event closely, as it is not the organiser. As regards any official languages for the event, therefore, the Commission would suggest contacting the organisers, namely Unesco, the Spanish State, the Generalitat de Catalunya and the Ajuntament de Barcelona. In any event, the event's website (http://www.barcelona2004.org) exists in three languages: English, Catalan and Spanish.

---

(1)  Written answer of 21.10.2003.

1

---
NSA Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) Complaints Data

Posted Pursuant to the No Fear Act

FY22 (4

th Quarter)

I. Complaints of Discrimination Filed

Number of Complaints Filed 46

Number of Individuals Filing Complaints 42

Number of Individuals Filing Two or More Complaints 4

II. Bases of Complaints Filed

Age 7

Color 8

Disability 18

National Origin 4

Race 7

GINA 6

Religion 16

Reprisal 5

Sex 10

1. Equal Pay Act 0

2. Pregnancy Discrimination Act 0

III. Issues of Complaints Filed

Assignment of Duties 4

Awards 0

Disciplinary Action

Warning 2

Removal 1

Suspension 0

Disciplinary 11

Duty Hours 0

Evaluation/Appraisal 2

Examination/Test 0

Harassment (Sexual) 0

(Non-Sexual) 8

Promotion/Non-selection 6

Reasonable Accommodation 4

Reassignment - Denied 0

Termination 0

Terms and Conditions of Employment 14

Time and Attendance 1
Training 0

IV. Average Complaints Processing Time to Completion

All Investigations

1. Hearing Not Requested 34

2. Hearing Requested 12

Final Actions by Agency

1. Processing Time Without a Hearing/FAD 267

2. Processing Time With a Hearing/Final Order 180

V. Dismissals

Number of Dismissals 7

Average Days Pending At the Time of Dismissal 54

VI. Withdrawals

Number of Complaints Withdrawn by Complainants 4

VII. Findings of Discrimination

Findings Rendered with a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Findings Rendered without a Hearing

Number of Findings 0

Issues of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Issues 0

Bases of Findings of Discrimination

Number of Bases 0

VIII. Pending Complaints Carried Over From Previous FYs

Complaints Open Any Length of Time During Reporting Year

1. Number of Individuals Filing These Complaints 16

2. Number of These Complaints Currently Pending 16

Status of These Cases:

1. Investigation 45

2. Final Agency Action 5

Hearing 16

 Appeal 5

IX. Complaints Pending Any Length of Time This Fiscal Year Not 

Investigated Within 180 Days (plus any authorized extensions)

0