alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF SIGNAL OFFICER 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

Dr. Hugh O'Neill,, 

The Catholic Universit7 of America,, Washington,, D. C. 

Dear Dr. O'Neill: 

26 June 1944. 

!PSIS-3 

I viah to thank J'OU ver1 much tor sending me tvo 

reprint• of your recent paper,, "Botanical Observations on 

the VOJDich Manuscript". I am ver7 b&pp7 to have this 

item to add to 1J1J' collection and vill ask Colonel XcGra11 

if he v1shea to have a cop7. 

I also vish to take this opportunit7 to transmit my- peraonal thank• through you to Dr. Petersen tor bis courtes7 

in making available to us the complete photostatic eop7 ot 

the VOJ111ch Manuscript. A recent letter from Mias-Nill 

advises that a negative photostatic copy is being sent to 

our group and this should be ver7 helpf'ul to us. 

With cordial greetings,,_ I am,, 

Sincerely 7ours, 

Yilliam F. Friedman1 

Director of Communications 

Research. 

pproved for Release by NSA on 07-15-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

13526
REF IDT~66013 

.. . u. p. Corvi.th 

Vice Pre~id.t:ti.t 

V.ater11 

® llud.aon 

Un.ion 

Stroot, 

!elt:gr-.ph 

Jtoom A 

~ 

... 3l 

kw Tork 13, h1t York 

lloar Hr~ Corvi tht 

-- -- - --"'~- .!. .._I I.: l\.. f.,U.,,;1? 

lo .mt!ai,pation at i'ut'Ul'(l activitiea ot the Panela 

Mil1(t organ!~'Jd ~ thct kt1onel. E:Wtcur!tf Agent;y 

Scientific Advia¢ry Je6rd,. a Joint aetin,g ot all tbreQ 

~la i• 'Nine ~uled tg;i- 00 ... 21 ~ 1954. 1 u ino1t>6~ f'or ~ inf'orms.tion IMDpl• cop.tee ot the · 

lettert 11ent to the Panel ~· who have been btvited. 

tor the ...tinel ~ both 20 MCI. ~ May and. to thotte 

invited onl:y tor 21 ~~ -

It is bope-1 ~t you,,. u Cbei:nan ot tbe ~le· 

COlllrA.\n1catiOWJ Paziel 'Will t1ncl yourklf 111 po11t1on to 

J&t'tiaipate J.n the activitie• 00. both ao and 11 May. 

WlU..IAM 1 .. l'JU~ 

.hecutiY• Secntt.a.ry 

.lllA Sctent.itic MvitK>ry brd 

ft J:ncllJ I 

1, ~le capy ot lettAr eent to P\uJ4l ~r• 

~or ao~21 Me.Jt' 1111eeti.Dg. 

2~ Suple 

ror 21 

copy 

~ 

ot 

1*Jettnaletter aent to ,.,,_l ~ 

cc: NJ ' 

c/s 

S/M3$T (Mr. Friednwl) 

M/R: Inf'orms Panel chairnnn 01: joint meeting of P&nel.s o£ NSASAB 

on 20~21 May and invites his attendance. 

M.M.fel.erski/S/ASST/60493/9 Apr 54 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E_O_ 1352a
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1064

CLYDE M. DAVIS-EL, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

HENRY G. CISNEROS, Secretary, HUD; HAROLD

YOUNG, Acting State Coordinator, Maryland

State Office; ROGER WILLIS, Acting Chief,

R.E.O. Branch for Maryland State Office; U.S.

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN DEVELOPMENT;

OTHER UNNAMED AGENTS,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

ALAN W. HEIFETZ, Chief Administrative Law

Judge,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96-

1857-MJG)

Submitted: August 28, 1997 Decided: September 10, 1997

Before WILKINS, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clyde M. Davis-El, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United

States Attorney, Donna Carol Sanger, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his

civil action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis-El v.

Cisneros, et al. No. CA-96-1857-MJG (D. Md. Nov. 12, 1996). We deny

Appellant's motion for stay pending appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1855 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1855

  To provide special foreign military sales status to the Philippines.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 23, 2015

  Ms. Hirono (for herself, Mr. Rubio, Mr. Menendez, and Mr. Johnson) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                     Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide special foreign military sales status to the Philippines.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``United States-Philippines Security 
Partnership Enhancement Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL FOREIGN MILITARY SALES STATUS FOR THE PHILIPPINES.

    The Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq.) is amended--
            (1) in sections 3(d)(2)(B), 3(d)(3)(A)(i), 3(d)(5), 
        21(e)(2)(A), 36(b), 36(c), 36(d)(2)(A), 62(c)(1), and 63(a)(2), 
        by inserting ``the Philippines,'' before ``or New Zealand'' 
        each place it appears;
            (2) in section 3(b)(2), by inserting ``the Government of 
        the Philippines,'' before ``or the Government of New Zealand''; 
        and
            (3) in section 21(h), by inserting ``the Philippines,'' 
        before ``or Israel'' each place it appears.
                                 <all>
```
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT JASON C AB O T, Plaintiff - Appe lla nt, v. STEPHANE C OM B ET-B LANC ; PAULA AB R AHIM I, De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 12-55422 D.C . No. 2:10-c v-05728-ODW AJW M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the C e ntra l Distric t of C a lifornia Otis D. W

right, II, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d M arc h 10, 2014 ** B e fore : PR EGER SON, LEAVY, a n d M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s . Ja son C a bot a ppe a ls pro se from

the distric t c ourt’ s orde r dism issing his dive rsity a c tion a s ba

rre d b y the a pplic a ble sta t ute s of limita

t ions. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. W e re vie w de novo. Ellis v . San Die go , 176 

# FIL ED MAR 17 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).F.3d 1183, 1188 (9th C ir. 1999). W e a ffirm .

The distric t c ourt prope rly dism isse d C a

bot’ s a c tion be c a

u se C a bot file d suit a fte r the a pplic a b l e sta tute s of lim i tations ha d e xpire d. Se eC a l. C iv. Proc . C ode § 335.1 (two y e a

rs for “ [a ] n a c tion for a ssa u lt, ba tte ry , or injury

to . . . a n individual c a

use d by the wrongful a c t or ne gle c t of a nothe r” ); § 340 (one y e ar for de fam at ion a

nd fa lse im

prisonm e nt c la im s). The distric t c ourt did not a buse its disc re tion in deny ing C a b ot’ s m otion unde r Fe d. R . C iv. P. 59 be c a use C a bot fa i le d to e sta

blish grounds wa

rranting re c o nside ration. Se eSc h. Dist. N o. 1J , Multnomah C

nty ., Or. v . AC

a ndS, Inc . , 5 F.3d 1255, 1262-63 (9th C ir. 1993) (se tting forth sta nda rd of re vie w a

nd grounds for re c onside ration unde r R ule 59(e )). C a bot’ s a rgum e nt tha

t the distric t c ourt should ha v e pe rm i tte d disc ove ry

to a llow him to e s ta blish theam ount of tim e , if a ny , de fe nda

nts we re a

b se nt from C a lifornia to toll his c l a im s unde r C a l. C i v. Proc . C ode § 351 is unpersua sive . AFFIRM E D.

1 2 - 5 5 4 2 2 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         190,409
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,388,493
<PP&E>                                         769,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                 226,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,931,761
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,575,782
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,820,607)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,931,761
<SALES>                                      5,047,474
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,687,457
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                15,397
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             244,370
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (3,868,596)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (3,868,596)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (3,868,596)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)


</TABLE>
Exhibit (31)(1)



CERTIFICATION



I, David A. Woodle certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of C-COR Incorporated;



2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors:



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                       |  |                                        
|---------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: February 2, 2005 |  | /s/ David A. Woodle                    
|                       |  | David A. Woodle Chief Executive
Officer
AFS-13-329-E

May 17, 2013

 Exemption No. 10327A

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2011-0770

Mr. Don Bintz

Unmanned Systems, Inc.

2709 Cyrano Avenue

Henderson, NV 89052

Dear Mr. Bintz:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption 

No. 10327. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions 

and limitations. In addition, please note that the exemption number above has been changed 

to reflect your correct designated exemption number, Exemption No. 10327.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated April 1, 2013 you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Unmanned Systems, Inc. (USI), for an exemption from §§ 91.9(b)(2) and 91.203(a) 

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). This exemption will allow USI to 

operate an unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that does not carry and display the aircraft’s 

airworthiness, certification, and registration documents required under part 91.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to USI.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10327 

remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the 

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has 

delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. The documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the pilot in 

command of the UAS anytime the aircraft is operating.

2. Those documents required under §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be made available 

within 10 days to any FAA, U.S. Department of Defense, or law enforcement 

official.

3. This exemption is not valid for operations outside the United States.

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2016, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Deputy Director, Flight Standards

 Service
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1924 

To transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain Bureau of Land Management land from the Secretary of the Interior to the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs for inclusion in the Black Hills National Cemetery, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

AUGUST 4, 2015 

Mr. THUNE (for himself and Mr. ROUNDS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To transfer administrative jurisdiction over certain Bureau 

of Land Management land from the Secretary of the 

Interior to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for inclusion 

in the Black Hills National Cemetery, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Black Hills National 

5 Cemetery Boundary Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS. 

7 In this Act: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1924 IS

1 (1) BLM LAND.—The term ‘‘BLM land’’ 

2 means the approximately 191.24 acres of Bureau of 

3 Land Management land within Meade County, 

4 South Dakota, which is more particularly described 

5 as follows: 

6 (A) In sec. 23, T. 5 N, R. 5 E., Black 

7 Hills Meridian— 

(i) the land in the SW1⁄4SW1 8 ⁄4 located 

9 south of the tread of the Centennial Trail; 

(ii) the land in the SE1⁄4SW1 10 ⁄4 located 

11 south of the tread of the Centennial Trail 

12 and southwest of the southwesterly rail13 road right-of-way boundary described and 

14 authorized under MTM–14260; and 

(iii) the land in the SW1⁄4SE1 15 ⁄4 lo16 cated southwest of the southwesterly rail17 road right-of-way boundary. 

18 (B) In sec. 26, T. 5 N, R. 5 E., Black 

19 Hills Meridian— 

20 (i) lots 5, 11, and 12; and 

21 (ii) in lot 10, the land located south22 west of the southwesterly railroad right-of23 way boundary described and authorized 

under MTM–14260 and NW1⁄4NW1 24 ⁄4. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1924 IS

1 (2) CEMETERY.—The term ‘‘Cemetery’’ means 

2 the Black Hills National Cemetery in Sturgis, South 

3 Dakota. 

4 SEC. 3. TRANSFER OF ADMINISTRATIVE JURISDICTION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Administrative jurisdiction over 

6 the BLM land is transferred from the Secretary of the 

7 Interior to the Secretary of Veterans Affairs for inclusion 

8 in the Cemetery. 

9 (b) BOUNDARY MODIFICATION.—On the transfer of 

10 the BLM land under subsection (a), the boundary of the 

11 Cemetery is modified to include the BLM land. 

12 (c) MODIFICATION OF PUBLIC LAND ORDER.—On 

13 the transfer of the BLM land under subsection (a), Public 

14 Land Order 2112, dated June 6, 1960 (25 Fed. Reg. 

15 5243), is modified to exclude the BLM land. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32

            WINTHROP RESIDENTIAL ASSOCIATES I, A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                            FORM 10-QSB JUNE 30, 2005

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Winthrop Residential Associates
I, A Limited Partnership, (the "Partnership"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the
date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Partnership.


Date: August 12, 2005                                    /s/ Michael L. Ashner
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Michael L. Ashner
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


Date: August 12, 2005                                    /s/ Thomas C. Staples
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Thomas C. Staples
                                                         Chief Financial Officer


                                    16 of 17
*Friday, September 17, 1999*

DISCIPLINARY DOCKET

99-1109.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Doe.

On June 14, 1999, movant, Disciplinary Counsel, filed a motion requesting this court to issue an order directing respondent to appear and show cause why he should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with requests for information and with a subpoena *duces tecum*issued by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline. On June 14, 1999, movant also filed a motion to file its motion under seal. Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED by this court that the motion to seal be and is hereby granted until further order of this court. It is further ordered that the motion to appear and show cause be and is hereby granted to the extent that respondent show cause by filing a written response with the Clerk of this court on or before twenty days from the date of this order why respondent should not be held in contempt. It is further ordered that if respondent fails to show cause, respondent will be indefinitely suspended until respondent fully complies.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that all documents filed with this court in this case shall meet the filing requirements set forth in the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio, including requirements as to form, number, and timeliness of filings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, *sua sponte,*that service shall be deemed made on respondent by sending this order, and all other orders in this case, by certified mail to the most recent address respondent has given to the Attorney Registration Office.
## IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA

April 12, 2024 SC-2024-0042 Ex parte A.J.E. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS (In re: A.J.E. v. B.S. and V.S.) (Limestone Juvenile Court: JU-21-309.01; Civil Appeals: CL-2023-0193).

CERTIFICATE OF JUDGMENT WHEREAS, the petition for writ of certiorari in the above referenced cause has been duly submitted and considered by the Supreme Court of Alabama and the judgment indicated below was entered in this cause on April 12, 2024: Writ Denied. No Opinion. Bryan, J. -- Parker, C.J., and Shaw, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Rule 41, Ala. R. App. P., IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this Court's judgment in this cause is certified on this date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, unless otherwise ordered by this Court or agreed upon by the parties, the costs of this cause are hereby taxed as provided by Rule 35, Ala. R. App. P.

I, Megan B. Rhodebeck, certify that this is the record of the judgment of the Court, witness my hand and seal.

Clerk, Supreme Court of Alabama