alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1809 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1809

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the treatment of 
 seasonal positions for purposes of the employer shared responsibility 
                              requirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 21, 2015

   Ms. Ayotte (for herself, Mr. King, and Mr. Blunt) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to simplify the treatment of 
 seasonal positions for purposes of the employer shared responsibility 
                              requirement.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Simplifying Technical Aspects 
Regarding Seasonality Act of 2015'' or the ``STARS Act''.

SEC. 2. SIMPLIFICATION OF SEASONAL RULES FOR PURPOSES OF EMPLOYER 
              SHARED RESPONSIBILITY REQUIREMENT.

    (a) Full-Time Employee Exception for Determining Assessable 
Payment.--Paragraph (4) of section 4980H(c) of the Internal Revenue 
Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subparagraph (B) as subparagraph (C), 
        and
            (2) by inserting after subparagraph (A) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(B) Exception for seasonal employees.--Such term 
                shall not include any seasonal employee.''.
    (b) Applicable Large Employer.--Subparagraph (B) of section 
4980H(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as 
follows:
                    ``(B) Exception for seasonal employees.--For 
                purposes of this paragraph, seasonal employees shall 
                not be taken into account as employees.''.
    (c) Seasonal Employee.--Subsection (c) of section 4980H of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraphs (5), (6), and (7) as 
        paragraphs (6), (7), and (8), respectively, and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (4) the following new 
        paragraph:
            ``(5) Seasonal employee.--The term `seasonal employee' 
        means an employee who is employed in a position for which the 
        customary annual employment is not more than 6 months and which 
        requires performing labor or services which are ordinarily 
        performed at certain seasons or periods of the year.''.
    (d) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in section 1513 of the Patient Protection and 
Affordable Care Act.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Properties Fund XVI 1997 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000351931
<NAME> CENTURY PROPERTIES FUND XVI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             353
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       11
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          14,867
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,061
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   8,747
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          7,457
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,001
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     8,747
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,415
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,409
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 311
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (50)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (50)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (50)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.36)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
• REF ID:A70122 • 

Dear Adndral Stone: 

424 North George l.tuon Drift 

Arlington 3, Virginia 

5 October 1951 

I was highly pleased to receive the nice photograph 

with its flattering autograph and wish to thank ;you verr 

much for 7our courteq. 

Mt o.ttice was recentq m.cned a11 per plane an! now I 

have a ver'1' f'ine wall on which to atru tJJT galler,y of 

notables and diatinguiahed. contributor• in the tield of 

1$.erellt. Your photograph will occupy a prominent position 

therein. 

'lhings are going along tairq well. I juet got back 

this .morning trait a trip to the Air University, where I 

gan the uaual lecture before the C-E Division. 

We had the pleasure or seeing Capt. Hanson a couple 

ol days ago, who ca.ma in to aay hia farewell.a. He was 

looking quite well am seems ~o be ~ell on the road to ccmplete recove17 • 

... e' U soon be loaing 'Pick. A farewell party ia being 

gf:nn ror him on the lltb ot October. 

With cordial greeting• to J!re. stone, to ,cu, an:l to 

Liaa\. Block, a.rd ?d.th aeaurancea ot 1qy appreciation of 7our 

photo,,.aph, 

Rear Admiral F.arl E. Stone, u.s .. N. 

CcnM;rder Cruiser Divi.aion One 

c/o Fleet Post Office 

San·Francieco, California 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 03-27-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 
'- . • 

REF ID:A70122 

• ,-~- ~ 

~ 

COMMANDER ~RUISER DIVISION ONE 

C/O Fleet Pos1 Office 

SAN FRANCISCO,CALIFORNIA 

{/lt1. ~ -

f/T.Afi'H7.J""/L>'~· ~~;(£,~ - di~ ~ , 

;a~~~~ '£;!"~./'~ '.J 22{? - a -~ ~ 

I
EXHIBIT 32(b)








CERTIFICATION OF


AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 as filed with Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 12, 2010                                      By:         /s/  John F. Ferraro


John F. Ferraro


Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer




This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 99.2

                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             SECTIONS 302 AND 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and the Chief Financial Officer
("CFO") of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


      Date: February 11, 2003           By:      /s/ Robert I. Lieberman
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Robert I. Lieberman
                                           Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer


                                    Page 16
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10806

Summary Calendar

 

MARVIN CRAIG MITCHELL,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

A. STARK, Corporal; ROBISON, Officer,

Defendants-Appellants.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:96-CV-122-C

- - - - - - - - - -

March 4, 1998

Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

 A. Stark and T.J. Robison appeal the district court’s

denial of their motions for summary judgment based on qualified

immunity. They argue that Marvin Craig Mitchell’s injury was

de minimis, that their actions were not the direct and only cause

of Mitchell’s injury, and that their actions were objectively

reasonable in that they were necessary to restrain Mitchell and

prevent him from destroying evidence. Based on the summary

judgment evidence, the district court determined a reasonable
No. 97-10806 

-2-

jury could conclude that the actions of Stark and Robison in

striking Mitchell while he was handcuffed and on the floor were

excessive, directly resulted in Mitchell’s injuries, and were

objectively unreasonable. Stark and Mitchell have not shown that

the district court erred in denying their motions for summary

judgment.

AFFIRMED.
#### Dufur, imp., Respondent, vs. Home Investment Company, imp., Appellant.

*September 7*

September 27, *1904.*

*Judgment: Vacating at subsequent term.*

In the absence of any claim that a judgment was void or was the result of clerical error, or that it was rendered through mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, and in the absence of any motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, the circuit court has no power to set it aside at a term subsequent to that at which it was rendered.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Ashland county: John K. PaRish, Circuit Judge.

*Reversed.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *A. W. Sanborn,*and oral argument by A. *T. Pray.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *E. 0. Alvord.*

Winslow, J.

This is an appeal from an order vacating a final judgment. The order was not made during the term at which the judgment was rendered, but at a subsequent term. There was no claim that the judgment was void or was the result of a clerical error, nor was there any proof or claim that it was rendered through mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, so as to come within the provisions of sec. 2832, Stats. 1898. Neither was the motion brought within the provisions of sec. 2879, Stats. 1898. Under these circumstances, the court manifestly erred in vacating the judgment. *Whitney v. Karner,*44 Wis. 568; *Zinc C. Co. v. First Nat.*Bank, 103 Wis. 125, 79 N. W. 229; *Bassett v.*Bassett, 99 Wis. 344, 74 N. W. 780.

*By the Gouri.*— Order reversed.
REF ID:A65513 

Mr. .JobD Coad>• 

Iatemat1mal 1Swl1J:ea1 Machine& Corp. 

~aie, JJn York 

1'lel' Jtr • Coo?il:ta I 

n.ta 1• to acknowledge :receipt ot JOUr' acceptar:a.ce ~ 

tbe iDYitatim to YlaS.t the lf&t:lcmal leCUl'it)' ~tar 

the 20·21 *1' Joint Panel eeet~. 

Ir JOU vf.11 Jlan to GT1Te at 3801 le'braak& Avem.w~ 

Wuh112gtcm, at 814' •·•· cm 20 *1'1 ve v1ll bl.ve IKl'Gleelle 

at the ptebouae to met ;you. 

I-. iocloe~ cop1e1 or 10\U' travel CIX'dera u4 a ~t1on requeat t~ tb.i• trip in accordance v1th 

FQUr vhbea. .AJ.ao illc.l.Olled tar 7c:JUr eonveutence 1al u 

1utruct1ou •beet with tbe requil'ed t~ "° tbat JOU '118'¥' 

i:eceive conpeuatton tar J'Olll' HJ"Vicea u p!'Clapt~ M 

po.t•1ble \lpOl1 tbeir coiiplet1on. 

ca: AG _ 

C/8 T s/ ASST (Mr":° J'riednan) 

WILLIAM 1. IBIElJWI 

a.cu.ts.ve ~t&J7 

EA Sc!ent.1tio M:d.aa17 J!locard. 

M/R: Acknowledging receipt ar Mr. Coombs' 

acceptance to 20-23. May Joint Panel. meetings. Inclosi»g travel. orders,, T/R,, and other 

neceaaary torms tar subject visit. Notes 

ti.ma ot arrival NSA. 

LT, I, T. McDonald/6o493/~54/can 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3
99-598.

#### State ex rel. Forsyth v. Brigner.

Montgomery App. No. 17547. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. On June 11, 1999, appellant filed a motion for oral argument that was due, under S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(2)(B), no later than June 2, 1999. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits untimely filings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, *sita sponte,*that appellant’s motion for oral argument be, and hereby is, stricken.
To 

I 

V' 

REA ID: A66899 .... Date --------

SECURITY DIVISION 

ROUTING SLIP 

Chief, Security Division 

Ass't Chief, Security Div. 

Technical Consultant 

Executive, Sec. Div. 

Tec~S~81) 

Materiel Branch (AS-82) 

Custodian 

Methods Branch (AS-83) 

. Protective Branch (AS-84) 

Maintenance Branch (AS-85) 

Historian (AS-80) 

All Officers 

From 

/ 

C,u,/ 

For: D Action 

D Ap~al 

rUn'f ormation 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 

2-18-2014 ursuantto E.O. 13526 

/ 
SECRET , CONFID~~.;AL , REF RDTA~ • DATE W ""' 

TO .FROM· TO FROM , ,... _Chief, ASA ........... (10)_ _ /Tech Staff ......... (96)_ 

__ Executive 0 ........ (11)_· _ -_L/_C Ch, Security Div ..... (80) __ 

_ Co'r Joint Oper ..... (12)_ ' Tech Staff ......... (81) __ 

__ Deputy Chief, ASA ... (20) Ch, Materiel Br .... (82) __ 

Ch, Comm Res Sec.(14)__ Ch, Methods Br .... (83) __ 

Ch, Hist Unit .... (13)__ Ch, Protective Br ... (84)_._ 

Ch, Pers Sec ....... (21)_ Ch, Maint Br ...... (85)_· 

Ch, Org & Tng Sec'. . (22)_ _ Ch, Res Lab Div .... (70)_ 

Ch, Plans & Oper ... (23)_ Tech Staff ......... (71)_ 

Ch, Materiel Sec .... (24)_ Ch, Ch. Ciph & Cif Br(72)_ 

Ch, Fiscal Sec ..... (25) · . Ch, Int Equip Br ... (73)_·_ 

Adjutant, ASA ..... (26)= Ch, Elec & Elec Br. (74)_ 

Ch, Sec Cont Sec ... (27)_ Ch, Lab Serv Br .... (75) _ 

__ Ch, Operations Div .. (90)__ Ch, C'logic -Br ...... (76) __ 

Ch, Lab Br ........ (91)_ _. Ch, Pers & Tng Br .... (61)_· __ 

Ch, Machine Br .... (92)_ _Ch, Supply Br ........ (62) __ 

Ch, Crypt Br ...... (93)_ _· _Co, Arlington Hall .... (40)_ 

Gh, Int Cont Br .... (94)_ 

Ch, I & D Br ...... (95)_ 

) Approval & Return 

) As Requested 

) Concurrence or Comments 

) Information & Forwarding 

) Information & Return 

CSGAS 96 (f!ev. 12) 16 Apr 47 47938 

( tl("Information & File 

( ) Recommendation 

( ) Signature if approved 

( ) Your action by 

( ) Info upon which to base reply 
~ =tr ~899 • 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT: Poaa1ble Compromise ot American 

Code in Pazila /" 

~·' 

Toi Sec. ot State 

From: ASA 

CLASSIFICATION NUMBER: V1olat1on or c:rntOCraph1c Secur1t7•Correapondence 

Date of Communication: 3 Jun 48 

Date of Basic Document: 

BRIEF SUMMARYz . .l thorou,ch aearch ot Department ot the Army ftle• haa revealed 

no enc%"1pted mesaages conta1n1ng information felat1Te to the two 

intelligence reports dealing with possible compromise ot "American 

codert. . 

It is considered that a study ot the State Department •&•••I• files 

m1ght be desired. 

Classifier: Mrs Be7ke 

Typist: Jira Beyke 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

FILE: Department-State 

) ., 

WDGAS form No, 1493 1October1946 44052 

Ta;P S!CRET ..._ ________ _..._ __ ......__..----''=-----'-'~~- ----

Routed to: Pile 

Date of Classifying1 21 .Tun 48 

~ .. 

• I
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 2034 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional aggravating 

factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on the status 

of the victim. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 

Mr. TOOMEY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional 

aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty based on the status of the victim. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Thin Blue Line Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AGGRAVATING FACTORS FOR DEATH PENALTY. 

6 Section 3592(c) of title 18, United States Code, is 

7 amended by inserting after paragraph (16) the following: 

8 ‘‘(17) KILLING OR TARGETING OF LAW EN9 FORCEMENT OFFICER.— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 2034 IS

1 ‘‘(A) The defendant killed or attempted to 

2 kill, in the circumstance described in subpara3 graph (B), a person who is authorized by law— 

4 ‘‘(i) to engage in or supervise the pre5 vention, detention, investigation, or pros6 ecution, or the incarceration of any person 

7 for any criminal violation of law; 

8 ‘‘(ii) to apprehend, arrest, or pros9 ecute an individual for any criminal viola10 tion of law; or 

11 ‘‘(iii) to be a firefighter or other first 

12 responder. 

13 ‘‘(B) The circumstance referred to in sub14 paragraph (A) is that the person was killed or 

15 targeted— 

16 ‘‘(i) while he or she was engaged in 

17 the performance of his or her official du18 ties; 

19 ‘‘(ii) because of the performance of his 

20 or her official duties; or 

21 ‘‘(iii) because of his or her status as 

22 a public official or employee.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# CE2004078EN.01095701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/957 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/957

---

(2004/C 78 E/1014)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0616/04

by Klaus Hänsch (PSE) to the Commission

(1 March 2004)

Subject:   Allocation of EU resources

Subject:

As regards the allocation of EU resources to the district (Kreis) of Mettmann and the cities of Duisburg, Düsseldorf, Neuss, Remscheid, Solingen and Wuppertal (in North Rhine-Westphalia), will the Commission give:

| 1. | The total amount and breakdown of EU structural resources received under the individual funds and the various Community programmes and initiatives? |
| --- | --- |

1.

The total amount and breakdown of EU structural resources received under the individual funds and the various Community programmes and initiatives?

| 2. | The amount of EU resources allocated since 1999 under other budgetary headings for pilot projects or — as direct aid — to universities, research establishments, enterprises and other bodies in the above-mentioned cities and the district of Mettmann? |
| --- | --- |

2.

The amount of EU resources allocated since 1999 under other budgetary headings for pilot projects or — as direct aid — to universities, research establishments, enterprises and other bodies in the above-mentioned cities and the district of Mettmann?

| 3. | The number of jobs created or maintained by means of this assistance? |
| --- | --- |

3.

The number of jobs created or maintained by means of this assistance?

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(4 March 2004)

(4 March 2004)

The Commission is collecting the information it needs to answer the question. It will communicate its findings as soon as possible.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2095 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2095

 To establish certain requirements with respect to pollock and golden 
                               king crab.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 29, 2015

   Ms. Cantwell (for herself, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Sullivan, and Mrs. 
    Murray) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish certain requirements with respect to pollock and golden 
                               king crab.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alaskan Pollock and Golden King Crab 
Labeling Act''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Pollock and Golden King Crab.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, for purposes of applying the Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.)--
            (1) the acceptable market name of Gadus chalcogrammus, 
        formerly known as Theragra chalcogramma, is ``pollock''; and
            (2) the acceptable market name of Lithodes aequispinus is 
        ``golden king crab''.
    (b) Labeling of Pollock.--Section 403 of the Federal Food, Drug, 
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 343) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
    ``(z) If it is labeled or advertised as `Alaskan pollock' or 
`Alaska pollock' and it is not pollock that is harvested in the 
exclusive economic zone (as that term is defined in the section 3 of 
the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (16 U.S.C. 
1802)) or the State waters adjacent to the State of Alaska.''.
                                 <all>
```