alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           8,511                  12,398
<SECURITIES>                                       980                   7,729
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,283                  29,924
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,264                   5,636
<INVENTORY>                                      3,021                   3,664
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                49,802                  67,405
<PP&E>                                          44,689                  39,892
<DEPRECIATION>                                  30,079                  25,296
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  91,886                 106,309
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           42,537                  57,871
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           190                     186
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,777                  44,156
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    91,886                 106,309
<SALES>                                         76,103                  85,935
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                88,262                 101,706
<CGS>                                            8,447                  11,784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,220                 109,682
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   219                      60
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  57                      27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (356)                 (6,667)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (128)                 (2,615)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (228)                 (4,052)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (228)                 (4,052)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)                  (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                  (0.24)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                     <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0                  14,604
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                 148,591
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                     371
<INVENTORY>                                          0                  21,274
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                 190,061
<PP&E>                                               0               1,277,009
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0                 606,625
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0                 863,672
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                 176,390
<BONDS>                                              0                 305,920
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                     326
<OTHER-SE>                                           0                 358,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0                 863,672
<SALES>                                        277,539                 722,055
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               278,926                 726,387
<CGS>                                          260,714                 666,229
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  260,714                 666,229
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,817                  18,094
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,419                  16,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,976                  26,064
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,652                   9,916
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,324                  16,148
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,324                  16,148
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .13                     .50
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .13                     .49


</TABLE>
Exhibit 12(a) 
 
 
                             XEROX CREDIT CORPORATION 
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES 
                                   (In Millions) 
 
 
                         Six Months Ended 
                             June 30,          Year Ended December 31, 
 
                            1997   1996     1996    1995   1994   1993   1992 
 
 
Income before income taxes $  64  $  63    $ 123   $ 119  $ 147  $ 154  $ 158 
 
Fixed Charges: 
   Interest expense 
     Xerox debt                3      3        5       6      5      4      2 
     Other debt              105    100      199     213    197    205    210 
       Total fixed charges   108    103      204     219    202    209    212 
 
Earnings available for 
  fixed charges            $ 172  $ 166    $ 327   $ 338  $ 349  $ 363  $ 370 
 
Ratio of earnings to 
  fixed charges (1)         1.59   1.61     1.60    1.54   1.73   1.74   1.75 
 
 
 
(1)  The ratio of earnings to fixed charges has been computed based on the 
     Company's continuing operations by dividing total earnings available 
     for fixed charges by total fixed charges. 
 
(2)  Debt had been assigned to discontinued operations based on the net 
     assets of the discontinued operations and the debt to equity ratios that 
     existed at the time the assets were acquired. Beginning in 1995, the 
     amount of interest expense that would have been allocated to 
     discontinued operations is insignificant and is now being reported 
     within continuing operations and therefore included in the fixed 
     charges.  Discontinued operations consist of the Company's real  
     estate development and related financing operations and its third-party  
     financing and leasing businesses.   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(12)
# CE2004084EN.01044302.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/443 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/443

---

(2004/C 84 E/0517)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0704/04

by Guido Sacconi (PSE) to the Commission

(4 March 2004)

Subject:   Transport of poultry

Subject:

EU citizens have repeatedly expressed concern for the conditions in which animals destined for slaughter or further fattening are kept, and the EP itself has called several times for an overall time limit for transport of eight hours or 500 km.

This concern regards all kind of animals, whose suffering should be limited by stricter rules.

The EC proposal for a review of the legislation on transport does not include any reference to stocking densities, journey limits, or stops for feeding and watering for poultry.

Several cases of transport of poultry which have involved serious problems of welfare and even death of these animals have been reported; in some cases, hundreds of animals died because the cages in which they were kept were broken by the cages above that crashed on to them.

Strict measures for the protection of poultry need to be introduced as a matter of urgency.

The EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) is currently producing evidence relating to the transport of poultry.

How and when will the Commission introduce standards for poultry within the debate for a new Regulation?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(2 April 2004)

(2 April 2004)

The Commission is aware of the animal welfare problems that may occur in the transport of poultry mentioned by the Honourable Member. The Commission proposal now under discussion in the Parliament and in the Council already includes general animal welfare requirements for the protection of poultry during transport aimed at improving the current situation.

Furthermore, in October 2002 the Commission requested the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare to examine the issue in order to elaborate a detailed scientific opinion on the protection of poultry during transport.

As the Scientific Committee for Animal Health and Animal Welfare (Schahaw) had not completed its evaluation at the time of transfer of competence for scientific advice from the Commission to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), the request was taken over by the EFSA Panel and Animal Health and Welfare.

Once the EFSA opinion becomes available the Commission will consider presenting a proposal to introduce additional standards for poultry.

---
: 

REF ID:A66121 

Co:mander Pendergrass, TIC 21 Ootober 1954 

Mr. J'riedman, 8/ABST 

R0-220-~11 Copy Ko. llS 

A few veeks ago ASA called and said that they wro cleaning out 

old tiles and that they had & document vhich w-e might like to have. 

I received today the accompanying doaument vhich deals with SlGSAtY 

and 8.lll 1;urn1ng this over to 1ou tor retention. 

WILLIAM F. 1RIIDMAD 

Inell 

RC-220-~l, 0¥ f 115 

·@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-01-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Iteris, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James S. Miele, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| 2.     |   | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 
|   | /s/  JAMES S. MIELE      |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | James  S. Miele          |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |
|   |                     |
|   | July 31,  2008      |

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or anyother document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----
REF ID:A63888 

e 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

Mr. William F. Friedman 

,31.0 2nd Street., s. E. 

Washington., D. c. 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

Serial: EXSAB 53-56 

17 October 1956 

At the meeting of the Board on 9 October., the question was raised 

as to lib.ether or not the members of the Board should tend.er their 

resignations to General. Canine., effective as of the end of his tenure 

as Director of the National. Securit7 Agency., in order to give the new 

Director a complete free hand. The Executive Secretary was directed 

to inquire as to the appropriate course of action and the desires of 

the new Director. This was done and I am hapw to report to the members 

of the Board that the reply to this query was that there was no reason 

or desire on the pa.rt of the successor to General. Canine for any- of 

the Board. members to resign. 

Sincerely., 

S. KULLBACK 

Executive Secretary 

NSA Scientific Advisory Board 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-15-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
#### Prather, Appellant, *v.*Brigano, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Prather v. Brigano*(1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 609.]

(No. 99-539

Submitted August 25, 1999

Decided September 29, 1999.)

*610
      *Gregory L. Prather, pro se.*

*Betty D. Montgomery,*Attorney General, and *D.J. Hildebrandt,*Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

*Per Curiam.*

The court of appeals did not err in dismissing Prather’s habeas corpus petition. Prather’s speedy-trial claim is not cognizable in habeas corpus. *State ex rel. Brantley v. Ghee*(1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 287, 288, 685 N.E.2d 1243, 1244. In addition, Prather did not attach his commitment papers to his petition. *Tucker v. McAninch*(1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 423, 696 N.E.2d 595, 596. Based on the foregoing, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
# Fourth Cour t of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 22, 2019

No. 04

- 18

- 00964

- CR

IN RE Jose Flores HERNANDEZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Irene Rios , Justice

On January 2, 2019, this court issued an opinion denying relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. On Jan uary 17, 2019 , relator filed a motion for rehearing . After considering the

motion, relator’s motion is hereby DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on January 22, 2019

.

PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO: _____________________________

Keith E . Hottle,

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 80

- CR

- 1362

- W , styled The State of Texas v. Jose Flores Hernandez

, pending in the 186th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Jefferson Moore presiding.
#### Waukesha County Agricultural Society, Respondent, vs. Wisconsin Central Railway Company, Appellant.

*March 25*

April *17, 1903.*

*Appealable order: Change of venue.*

An order denying a motion for a change of the place of trial is not appealable, under sec. 3069, Stats. 1898.

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Waukesha county: James J. Dick, Circuit Judge.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Action to recover damages alleged to have been caused by negligence of defendant in allowing fire to escape from one of its locomotive engines which ignited plaintiffs property, destroying the same. There was a motion on behalf of defendant for a change of the place of trial, and this appeal is from the order denying the same.

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Howard Moms*and *Thos. H.*Gill, and for the respondent on that of *Nyam,, Merton & Newbury.*

Marshall, J.

Such orders are not appealable. It has been repeatedly so held. *Evans v. Curtiss,*98 Wis. 97, 73 N. W. 432; *Latimer v. Central E. Co.*101 Wis. 310, 77 N. W. *540155; *Latimer v. Julius Andrae & Sons Co.*101 Wis. 311, 77 N. W. 1119; *State ex rel. Spence v.*Dick, 103 Wis. 407, 79 N. W. 421. It is now about eight years since the law respecting appealable orders was so changed as to tahe such as the one involved here out of the appealable class, and five years since it was so distinctly decided by this court. An order is not in such class merely because it denies a substantial right, as was formerly the case. To be in that class it must be: (a) one preventing a judgment 'from which an appeal may be taken; (b) one entered in a special proceeding or in an action after judgment; (e) one *granting,*refusing, continuing or modifying a provisional remedy, or granting, refusing, modifying or dissolving an injunction, or setting aside or dismissing a writ of attachment for irregularity, or granting a new trial or sustaining or overruling a demurrer; (d) or one vacating or refusing to set aside an order made at chambers which would be appealable if made by the court. Sec. 3069, Stats. 1898. Careful attention to this will prevent a recurrence of the mistake we find here.

*By the Oourt.*— The appeal is dismissed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.4 (RIGGS LOGO) Riggs National Corporation800 17 Street, NWWashington, D.C. 20006-3944(202) 835-5507Fax: (202) 835-5226
 February 27, 2004 Mr. Timothy C. Coughlin
President
Riggs National Corporation
800 17th Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20006 Dear Tim: Thank you for agreeing to become the Divisional Senior Vice President
for Embassy Banking in addition to your other responsibilities. Below
are the terms and conditions resulting from your acceptance of this
assignment:  1.
    
    You are authorized to prepare the definition of acceptable clients and the
strategic business plan for Embassy Banking to be approved by
Robert L. Allbritton and Lawrence I. Hebert and the Boards of Riggs Bank and Riggs
National Corporation for review and acceptance by the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.2.
    
    You will continue as President of Riggs National Corporation
at current
compensation or above until Full Retirement Age (65 years 10
months) or
receive equivalent severance pay without restrictions until
Full Retirement
Age for termination of employment other than by resignation,
retirement or in
the event of a finding by the Boards of gross negligence or
breach of fiduciary
duty involving personal profit.3.
    
    There will be a temporary suspension (up to six months or
longer by mutual
consent) of most of your other responsibilities including
Officer Committees,
Riggs Capital Partners, New Business Development, Customer
Retention,
Community Outreach/Involvement, Bank Philanthropic Activities,
etc., with
the exception of the Officers Risk Management Committee and
limited
involvement with the Legal Department, Riggs Investment
Advisors and
certain industry/community organizations including The
Financial Services
Roundtable, The Federal City Council and the Greater
Washington Board of
Trade.




---



##### 



Timothy 2. Coughlin
February 27, 2004
Page 2.  4.
    
    As long as you are Embassy Banking Group Executive while Riggs Bank
remains under a BSA enforcement action by the OCC, you will report directly to
the CEO of Riggs Bank on all matters regarding RNB & Emassy Banking.5.
    
    You are authorized to employ Embassy Banking staff with reasonable
choice of personnel from internal/external sources including the following
additions to staff or equivalent substitutions therefor:  -
    
    Risk Management: Patty McKeown and consultants/staff to be determined-
    
    Remediation Team: Cheryl Bryant, Amy Dawson and 2 officers from Compliance-
    
    Operations Team: Luis Gonzales and staff to be determined-
    
    Compliance: Imbedded Compliance Officer-
    
    Relationship Managers: 2 officers from Retail Banking for Africa/Middle East  6.
    
    You will have first call, if needed, on David Bachetti as soon as he is
available to return from London. Sincerely, -s- Lawrence I. Hebert
Lawrence I. Hebert
President and CEO 
Riggs Bank N.A.
    
    -s- Robert L. Allbritton
Robert L. Allbritton
Chairman and CEO
Riggs National CorporationAccepted and Agreed:-s- Timothy C. Coughlin
Timothy C. Coughlin
President, Riggs National Corporation
REF ID:A67047 

3 • 

CROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT: 

ltequeat tor SIGHUAD S,atea 

CLASSIFICATION NUMBER: 

l1•tem..Requ1rementa 

ToAS..9'6 

From~s.,.ee 

BRIEF SUMMARY:: 

Date of Communication:3 Jul fl1 

Date of Basic Document:l Jul •7 

C1'7P,oaratea 891 •111 be aupplled to o1te4 uni's for uae on 

C1rou1t 12190 bJ ? Jul.J 19t~. 

Routed to: 1'11• 

--~--

'.r -

. --=------

---&'"" .. ~ 

_. ""'~-... -"" ; I .. - .... - '° 

- f. 

.;. .. 

Classifier: M::ra Bepe 

Typist: llra 8e7ke Date of Classifyingr 26 Aug 47 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

WDGAS Form No, 1493 7 October 1946 44052 ' . 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 

J -

-· 

, 

. 

... "'= .. '~ 

-= ... -,.. ·~ ........ -.·.-.$-' 

......... -.. ~ 

····-~:~ 

. 

·----~ .. }. ; 

~.. .. ... 

I ~ f_l _.-,__,__,
# CE2004088EN.01024501.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/245 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/245

---

(2004/C 88 E/0248)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0913/04

by Philip Bradbourn (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(19 March 2004)

Subject:   Driver attestation checks

Subject:

Could the Commission inform me what percentage of HGV drivers entering the EU from non-member States are regularly checked in accordance with driver attestation regulations upon reaching the EU's common frontiers, especially Germany and Austria?

What minimum percentages of such checks are the European Commission and Member States proposing in order to ensure that following enlargement the new frontiers will be fully policed in respect of driver attestation?

Answer given by Mrs de Palacio on behalf of the Commission

(23 April 2004)

(23 April 2004)

Regulation (EEC) No 881/92 (1) as amended by Regulation (EC) No 484/2002 (2) foresees that a driver attestation shall be issued by the Member State at the request of the holder of the Community authorisation for each driver who is a national of a non-member country whom he lawfully employs or who is lawfully put at his disposal. This entails that only those drivers that are nationals of a non-member country driving a Community registered vehicle performing international carriage of goods (under the cover of a Community authorisation) must be in the possession of a driver attestation when checked, among others also at the border when entering the Community.

1

2

In principle at present all drivers covered by the scope of Regulation (EC) No 881/92 are checked at the external border when first entering the Community. This situation will not change after enlargement.

Moreover, the regulation mentioned provides that the competent authorities of the Member State of establishment shall regularly verify, by carrying out checks each year, covering at least 20 % of the valid attestations issued in that Member State, whether the conditions under which a driver attestation has been issued are still satisfied.

Finally, the objective of the Regulation (EC) No 484/2002 is not the protection of the internal market from competitive enterprises of non-member countries but the proper functioning of the Community's internal market for road transport.

---

(1)  OJ L 95, 9.4.1992.

1

(2)  Regulation (EC) No 484/2002 of the Parliament and of the Council of 1 March 2002 amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 881/92 and (EEC) No 3118/93 for the purposes of establishing a driver attestation, OJ L 76, 19.3.2002.

2

---