alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:

(1)   Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-106555) and in the related prospectus of LTC Properties, Inc.,

(2)   Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-115991) and in the related prospectus of LTC Properties, Inc.,

(3)   Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-130834) and in the related prospectus of LTC Properties, Inc.,

(4)   Registration
Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-143826) and in the related prospectus of LTC Properties, Inc.

(5)   Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115855) pertaining to the 1998 Equity Participation Plan of LTC Properties, Inc.,

(6)   Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115856) pertaining to the 2004 Stock Option Plan of LTC Properties, Inc., and

(7)   Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-115857) pertaining to the 2004 Restricted common stock Plan of LTC
Properties, Inc.;

of
our reports dated March 13, 2008, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedules of LTC Properties, Inc. and the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting of LTC Properties, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2007.



Los
Angeles, California
March 13, 2008

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 23


               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



   We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement
   (Form S-8, No. 33-48735) pertaining to the Swing-N-Slide Corp. Stock
   Program of our report dated January 30, 1998, with respect to the
   consolidated financial statements and schedules of Swing-N-Slide Corp.
   included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
   1997.




   Milwaukee, Wisconsin                   /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
   March 26, 1998
STEAM ELECTRIC

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: ________________________________________

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.

SE04360A169
POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOWN ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints each of Barry F. Schwartz, Robert K. Kretzman and Michael T. Sheehan or any of them, each acting alone, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, in connection with the REVLON, INC. (the ‘‘Corporation’’) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the ‘‘Form 10-K’’) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, to sign the Form 10-K in the name and on behalf of the Corporation or on behalf of the undersigned as a director or officer of the Corporation, and any amendments to the Form 10-K and any instrument, contract, document or other writing, of or in connection with the Form 10-K or amendments thereto, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, including this power of attorney, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and any applicable securities exchange or securities self-regulatory body, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has signed these presents this 13th day of March,  2007.

|        |  |  |                    |
|--------|--|--|--------------------|
| /S/    |  |  | RONALD O. PERELMAN |
|   |  |  | RONALD O. PERELMAN |
|        |

----
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation New York State Electric & Gas Corporation

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.* NRG Energy, Inc.* CCI Roseton* Orange& Rockland Utilities, Inc. Dynegy NE Generation, Inc.* Rochester Gas & Electric Corporation Long Island Power Authority Selkirk Cogen* National Grid* TransCanada* New York Pow er Authority* US Power Generating Co.* 

# ENVIRONMENTAL ENERGY ALLIANCE OF NEW YORK 677 Broadway, Suite 1205 Albany, NY 12207

- 2996

June 16 , 2014

Submitted Via E

- Mail to Ruvo.Richard@epa.gov

Re: Rescission of Determination of Attainment and Call for Attainment Plans for New York, New Jersey and Connecticut for the 1997 8

- Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard for the NY

- NJ

- CT 1997 Ozone Nonattainment Area

- Docket ID No. EPA

- R02

- OAR

- 2014

- 0251

D ear Mr. Ruvo
,
I am pleased to write on behalf of the Environmental Energy Alliance of New York, LLC (the Alliance; see list of generating company members highlighted below on this page) to provide this comment on the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposed decision to rescind its previously issued determination of
attainment for the 1997 8

- hour ozone standard for the New York

- N. New Jersey

- Long Island, (NY

- NJ

- CT)
ozone nonattainment area because recent monitoring data show that the area has subsequently violated
the 1997 8

- hour ozone national ambie nt air quality standard (NAAQS } and to call for revisions to the State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for the States of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut as published in the Federal Registe r [ Vol. 79, No. 94 ] on May 15 , 2014. Alliance members own and operate electric generating and transmission and distribution facilities located throughout New York State and, in some instances, across the nation and the globe. The operations of Alliance members contribute to the reliability of the State’s electric grid and to the economic well

- being of New York State.

The Alliance agrees with the EPA decision to rescind its previously issued determination of attainment for
the 1997 8

- hour ozone standard for the NY

- NJ

- CT ozone nonattainment a rea because of the monitoring
data results . The Alliance also supports EPA's alternative to develop and submit a SIP for the 2008
NAAQS. Inherent in this SIP would be a pathway to attain the 1997 NAAQS "as expeditiously as practicable." Given regulatory agency staff constraints it seems that developing a single SIP for the stricter standard rather than two separate SIPs makes sense.

Sincerely,

Roger Caiazza Director 

### Cc: R. Sliwinski, DEC
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

** United States v. Booker , 543 U.S. 220 (2005). United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED May 2, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41551 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOEL ERNESTO VALDES, also known as Julio Nestor, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-580-ALL

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Joel Ernesto Valdes preserves for further review his contention that his sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post- Booker ** rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory Sentencing Guideline regime condemned in Booker . Valdes concedes that his argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mares , 402 F.3d 511 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005), and its progeny, which have outlined this court’s methodology for reviewingNo. 06-41551 -2- sentences for reasonableness. Valdes also raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
REF ID:A415B3iai 

~- (JolWftl b (!. ll1YN,ttt1At" (Ret,.) z;~(!• 

~ 

Mvut~ . 

tlemie CCJll.P&\1V M~ ;1, si.c~tc• ~ 

~,aevratk 

DOU' GeDlr&l. RivM: 

.,.,.. 

S.-1.al~ l;J, <Pc:> 

1 3 APR 1954 

In • PN'liOWt lctta .to Jt!U1 1t VU· etatt4 tbat1 ~ to 

tlw .20--21 Apil twetina ot t1ae llat.1.0M.l fttcurity A,._ Scf.atlfie 

Ad:rlaotY !old; the ~l a.tl'hm, 'Wbo C"e allo • ••• at tbl ~. Vill biJ llltle t.o c.dtJt" vttla 10\l on i.atte• ot pr.l!Dl orpt\1• 

tat1on and tutun Mt1Vit.1••· · · 

\re IU'tt DCl"I •cbe4\1li:Jg • J:oillt ~inc ct all tb:ree ~la u4 

t\Wizt =a1"'8D OD 20-21 Mq l~. During ·tho ~ flt the lint 

4&)", all tM 12eee.IA17 64Ddn11t.ratiw d<aila will 'ba •c..,11.w. 

!l!\1• ahould ftq_l.).in onl1" a cc>upi. ol bow.-... !be ~ ot tM. 

. tint ~· t.till be a.votti4 "° ·~inl ~ vitJa ta. Jligbl t;tite 

of the O&"pnizatton .and :lta .ttd'f. !ae McODd. IJAy,, 21 Moy, will 

be d.evote4 to a aetadl.4t4 ~iosi u4 4lacn..1oD ot ac:w ot 

OUI' tedm.1•1 ~l«!IC .$il4 te> p1'1.nt tor ~ pnnel act1Vi· 

ti ... 

It. 18 1~13" ~ that ~ ViU l>e able to attfmel '"-· 

:ncet.bJp on 'both 1tbeM 4'\Y•• 

.It )"OU \r'il.l. 1et • ~ ~ )'t1\l pl.M. to attend u4 tho ·tlOlfa 

ot tx.iavel )'OU i;;rf1Ur1 I vru h::we t~ nacea-.r:t 't.rlmll or&wa .ent 

to 10U• 

M/lh ~-Joint act.tug ot f'~lJa ot Jt;A&J, ~ 1m1toa 

attnauff t1t IMllCber•. 

ee~ AG 

'ff ~/mL1W;tfSAr I 

Allt to S/1J&l/tSt:O 

~~ (Mr. 111111;&••••••1. pproved for Release by NSA on 12-01-2014 

ursuant to E.O. 13526
REF ID:A5166iz& 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

ARMED FORCES SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, 0. C. 

Mr. R. Dudley Slaith, Cdr. R.N. {Ret..) 

Ot!icee of the CJ'pber Policy Board 

c/o Room 9 

Foreign or.rice, s.w. 1 

Dear Dudley: 

IN REPLY REFER TO 

The paclcage ot books am your lett.er of 3 Bepteaber arrived, 

much to 1111' delight. But 7ou tailed to give me &fl7 indication u to 

the amount ot sterling I on you, not an insignificant quantity, 

I•m sure. ?lease do let me know ard I'll td.tber J!l&ll8&9 a reimburaement in sterling or will set up a dollal'" credit here, apinat which 

you can draw next time ;you're with us. 

About the P.aconiana a.-d their antics in the cr,-ptogra.phic 

field - I've been collecting .material tor a. knockout blow, which 

I hope to publluh some tiine soon. As a matter ot tact, I gave a 

2-hour ta.lk before the members al1d peats ot the Folger Shakespeare 

Ubrary a couple ot years ago, and the people there "re moat 

1.nsiatent that I do the thing up in book form. 11'.veey once in a 

while the7 needle me a.bout it, too, eo I guesa 1111 have to get. bue;y 

on assembling the reeulte or rq etudy or a rather large quantity of 

data. 

Thar...k ;you very much for your courtesy in gathering the ita1l8 I 

requested. 

Looking forward to seeing you a.gain eoon (the:re is a. poaaibilit7 of 1117 Yild.t.1.ng 1011 thia aut11nn) an:t with cordial greetings, 

I am,, 

Sincerely, 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
# CE2004078EN.01090301.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/903 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/903

---

(2004/C 78 E/0954)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4044/03

by Theresa Villiers (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(12 January 2004)

Subject:   Free passes for local residents to the grounds of heritage and tourist sites

Subject:

| 1. | Can the Commission confirm that under forthcoming EU regulation, heritage and tourist sites will be unable to provide people with free passes to their grounds based on geographical proximity? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Can the Commission confirm that under forthcoming EU regulation, heritage and tourist sites will be unable to provide people with free passes to their grounds based on geographical proximity?

| 2. | As a result of such a European law, will heritage and tourist sites, such as Hampton Court Palace in London for example, be obliged to revoke the passes giving free access to their grounds to local residents? |
| --- | --- |

2.

As a result of such a European law, will heritage and tourist sites, such as Hampton Court Palace in London for example, be obliged to revoke the passes giving free access to their grounds to local residents?

Answer given by Mr Bolkestein on behalf of the Commission

(17 February 2004)

(17 February 2004)

In its Judgment of 16 January 2003 in Case C-388/01 on admission to museums in Italy, the Court of Justice ruled that, like those based on nationality, preferential rates granted on the basis of the place of residence — even local — of visitors to cultural sites were discriminatory and hence incompatible with the EC Treaty, and in particular the principle of free movement of services.

According to consolidated case-law, a distinction drawn on the basis of residence is liable to operate mainly to the detriment of nationals of other Member States, since the majority of non-residents are foreigners. In particular, it is immaterial whether the contested measure may affect nationals of the State in question resident in other parts of the national territory as well as nationals of other Member States.

A distinction based on local residence could be acceptable only if it were based on overriding reasons in the general interest — in other words, not purely economic reasons — and if it respected the principles of necessity and proportionality.

In its proposal for a Directive on services in the internal market adopted on 13 January 2004, the Commission upholds the principle, as expounded in the case-law of the Court of Justice, of prohibiting distinctions based on nationality and place of residence, with respect to terms of access to services.

It is in the light of these principles that the competent national authorities should examine cases where there are differences in fees for admission to tourist sites, such as those mentioned in the question by the Honourable Member, and should take the appropriate measures on the basis of the particular features of each situation in order to avoid discrimination between nationals of the various Member States.

---
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION WITH RESPECT TO ANNUAL REPORT OF HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
  1.
    
    that the Report fully complies with all requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
 March
2, 2009
    
    /s/ Frank J. BramantiDate
    
    Frank J. Bramanti, Chief Executive OfficerMarch
2, 2009
    
    /s/ Edward H. Ellis, Jr.Date
    
    Edward H. Ellis, Jr., Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
, REF. Itf:AG2412 _· 

Cotttinenta.l Causalcy C~ 

Zd'tlDld• Juildil)g 

917 15th ~t, lorthvest 

Wuh!Dgton1 D* C • 

At.tentiont Mr. George L. Dai.nee 

tlbu" Jtr. Jlai.Qf!a s 

All I told you an tr. tele}rilon9 I vu So1n& to C.0 1 I am DOW' pttUae; 

around to vritil\g a letter 1n x .. p;rd to rJq Policy Jku:lt>er mo367 ~ 

out rltb ~ ~ on t4 Deeent>er 1928 --- a &00(1. acy yean ago. Du.rin& all t.het.e ~ there 1-a bmm wt a •lngle ocoa.eion :tor q tUitlg 

a claim under the te:rma or thi• pol.lay, and this was &1ao a. &QOO. *!lY 

)'Gara ago, w.n X be.d a be.ck injur.y. 1l'b!t ~ recogniM<l tbt.t I 

lw1 a. ...U4 !llail'll in that ,,._Md. pa1d wry prc:aptly and without que•tion. 

!he 1nJu:cy X'UU.lted fi'a::1 an accident wbich happened Wh4n I \It.a laying a 

t'l.ea-atooe -1.k in tmnt of 'I/('/ bol:B at 3932 Mllltaey .ftted, lorthweet. 

llhen l tele:Phooed )'OU ~tly with the query .. t.o Whethar SO' policy 

WOUld cover an !»Jury euttered b;y • u a result. or wbi.t l think could 

a1JK> be t.anlDd. an accident '¥®.. atated quite oe.tegarieally ~t you 

wre certain that l 414 not be.ve uy- WLlid cldla. You v1ll reca.U that 

I told you that l lillila takiag ~ ~ uereiaea Vith a vitn1 to girth 

QQ:l.trol and u a dinct precipj:tant ffffeet ot S\leh exeroiae on the morning at 3 April 1955 I 1-.d. a .,bee.rt At.tack" -- t&cbnioally deaign&ted &a 

a.~ ocelue1oo. Toi.a atated ~t tb.U could. hardly be conaidered 

the rell\llt; dt an uaceident" because I was doing 90ll8thillg which I intemed to do. Jua.t bov tine a 41.at1Dct1on ~ dre.Y ~n th19 latter e-piaodc 

and the one to whiell I reterred -.rlier 1n m:1 i.tter l 4o DOt uxdenate.rd, 

beclLU8e I w.s ~ oot ~ :riag 9t.ori.H around ror pure ULU1e-

.-nti l .- ~a ..n:. In the .me Mt:lse 1 "1llU 2lOt takhia exercises 

ort 3 A.prU Just tor am.utement1 there .,.. a Wr:f Mricwa pu.rpoae ill Tiew. 

ttntort\Ulately vblle the ~ w.a QQOd., llOdethins 'ifholAt}J' lminte:lded 

nmu ted azJ4 l .uttered 'Wbat la 1:.ex'l:.ed Ml 11accii!enta.l. bodily injury.• M 

coorae, I Wldenr'ta.td t.be.t it at,ght w .Ud that 8(;)()Qer or later tb.iJ 

"hurt attackrt J11Cb.t have eoaa from doing 90lll!thine •l.ee1 but the tatrt i• 

that it ONllll b-t'lll - ~the exerc1MJ it I~ a:>t been ®ina thentta1H tba.t 1IOJ:"n1ng there 1a a 'pc)981bll1ty that l :m1gbt QOt b&ve .uttered 

an;)" arioua w&ecid.enta.l. bodfJ~ in.JUI'¥~ ~ar ~ ~·· 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-16-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e 
REF ID:A62412
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance






	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit No. 10.36




SCHEDULE OF PARTICIPATING DIRECTORS





Armstrong World Industries, Inc. has entered into Directors Stock Unit Plans with certain of its
directors, including Stanley A. Askren, Jon A. Boscia, James J. Gaffney, Robert C. Garland, Judith
R. Haberkorn, James J. O’Connor, Russell F. Peppet, Arthur J. Pergament, John J. Roberts and
Alexander M. Sanders, Jr.
Spot Prices

http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/pet_pri_spt_s1_a.htm

07:58:35 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time)

Source: U.S. Energy Information Administration

Series Link http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=RBRTE&f=A

Series Key RBRTE.A

Year Europe Brent Spot Price FOB $/bbl

2012 111.63

2011 111.26

2010 79.61

2009 61.74

2008 96.94

2007 72.44

2006 65.16

2005 54.57

2004 38.26

2003 28.85

2002 24.99

2001 24.46

2000 28.66

1999 17.9

1998 12.76

1997 19.11

1996 20.64

1995 17.02

1994 15.86

1993 17.01

1992 19.32

1991 20.04

1990 23.76

1989 18.23

1988 14.91

1987 18.53
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2



                       INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
Engage Technologies, Inc.


We consent to the use of our reports incorporated by reference in the
registration statement on Form S-8 of Engage Technologies, Inc.


KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
December 20, 1999
EXHIBIT 8

LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

Following are significant (direct/indirect)
subsidiaries of Creative:



|                                           |  |                         |  |           |  
|------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | --------- | -
|Name/Region of Principal Operations        |  | Country ofIncorporation |  | Ownership |  
|United States of America:                  |  |                         |  |           |  
|Cambridge SoundWorks, Inc.                 |  | U.S.A.                  |  | 100       | %
|Creative Labs, Inc.                        |  | U.S.A.                  |  | 100       | %
|CL Direct, Inc.                            |  | U.S.A.                  |  | 100       | %
|                                           |  |                        
|Europe:                                    |  |                         |  |           |  
|Creative Labs Ireland                      |  | Ireland                 |  | 100       | %
|                                           |  |                        
|Asia:                                      |  |                         |  |           |  
|Broadxent Pte Ltd and subsidiary companies |  | Singapore               |  | 100       | %
|Creative Media Kabashiki Kaisha            |  | Japan                   |  | 70        | %
|Creative Technology Centre Pte Ltd         |  | Singapore               |  | 100       | %
|Cubic Electronics Sdn Bhd                  |  | Malaysia                |  | 100       | %
|Creative Labs Pty Ltd                      |  | Australia               |  | 100       | %
|Creative Technology (Qingdao) Co. Ltd      |  | China                   |  | 100       | %
|                                           |  |                        
|Others:                                    |  |                         |  |           |  
|CTI Limited                                |  | Bermuda                 |  | 100       | %
|CTI II Limited                             |  | Bermuda                 |  | 100       | %
|3Dlabs Inc., Ltd and subsidiary companies  |  | Bermuda                 |  | 100       | %
EXHIBIT 23.1

                    CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

      We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements (Form S-8 No. 33-99200 and No. 333-42497) pertaining to the 1990
Incentive Stock Plan, the 1995 Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Employee Stock
Purchase Plan, and the 1995 Directors' Stock Option Plan of our report dated
July 22, 1998, with respect to the 1998 and 1997 consolidated financial
statements and schedule of Metra Biosystems, Inc. included in the Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended June 30, 1998.

                                                               ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Palo Alto, California
September 24, 1998
-- -:: 

c 

0 

REF ID:A44714 

• ' • 

p HF.ADQUARrEP.S 

Y DEP.ARDIEN'l' 07 THE AlMlC 

otfice of the Allll1stant Chle:f of statt tor ?atelllgence 

Washinston 251 D. C. 

AC SI-CS Oc1I 28, l96o 

st1BJEC'l'1 National Security Agency Cont1ngel10)' Plan for CUba (Nar.CPC (U)) ~ 

TO: DJ.rector, National Security Agency 

Fort George o. Meade 

Mary1and 

l. References: 

•• National Security ~ ContiDSll!JlCY Plan :for CUbA (NBA.CPC) 

28 March l96o (Rectnded). 

b. Letter, ACSI-cs, OACSI DA, 25 1-ky 1960, subject: National. 

security Agency Ccmttngenoy Plan for CUba (NBACPC) (Wi)u 

c. Letter, IATOP, CHUSMA, 26 July l96o1 subject: National 

Secur1 ty Ai!!JDcy Contingency Plan for CUba ~ 

2. ~ National. Becurity Agency Contingency Plan for Cuba (NSACPC) 

dated 26 September 196o, which 11iwerseded NSACPC dated 28 March l96o, 

reference a above, has been :reviewed Within the Department ot the Arrtt::I· 

i'be ca!llleilts below are ma.de 1n response to the request contnincd in the 

Letter ot Prauulgat1on. 

a. The pro,posed !M!Justments of intercept posit10l1ll e~rage 

at USASA. fixed inatall.ations to be effective upon 1l!qll.ementat1on of the 

Contingency Plan as outlined in Annex B, are con•idered reasonabl.e end 

effective. 

b. Paragraph 50, of Annex C, places a :requirement on the UB 

Naval Security Group to provide a t'armmntca.tion link between a minor 

CCMI?lT relay station at Galmtanemo Ba;y 1 CU'ba end the USASA direct B\WPOrt 

unit, USA.SI\ lla1son with the Navel Security Group ha.II revea.led that 

their current planning does not provide tor the establishment Of this 

Uok, meanwhile, Hq, tJa6.BA has subst1tu~ a camnun1cat1on pl.an using 

'l'aek Force 25' e cQlllllOll•u&er f11.eW ties. 

c. The USASA interim operations plan (3l7th U&\SA BOP l-6o). as 

outlined in reference b & c above, remain• the USASA. plan to implement 

XVIII Airborne Corps S'l'RAC ClPLAN 51•59 pertaining to CUba. 

/s/ Jahn M. Willems 

JOHN M. 'lffi.I.li)!B 

Major General, GS 

ACotS for Intellicence 

eclassified and approved for release by 

SA on 10-28-2013 ursuantto E.O. 1352