alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
USCIB: z:;.5/7 th\NBLE VIA 8EMIN'f 0H:Mffl1!ib5 OH±i!C 

14 February 1955 

EQ 3.3(h) (2) 

'PGP SB8!1:lft PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MF.MBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: U.S. 

Reference: USCIB z:;.5/6, dated 19 January 1955 •. 

1. Vote sheet replies to the reference indicate approval by all 

members with the following e.x:eptions: 

a. STATE: Approved, subject to the following: 

"Para lOb of Enclosure 3 (Minimum Security Standards) 

appears -a.··· that there may be some~terials which th .· make available to non-t__jpersonnel. 

This woul · consistent with the principle enumerated 

in para & of the statement of objectives and the provision contained within para 4 of the aide memoire. 

I suggest that this subpara be deleted and that subpara 

lOa of Enclosure 3 be altered to accommodate this 

deletion. 11 

b. CIA: 11Desire paper be considered at next regular 

meeting of USCIBEC. 11 

2. Accordingly, the reference will be placed on the agenda for 

consideration at the 25th meeting of USCIBEC. 

USCIB: 29.5/7 ff AMMIE VIA eOMINi' entcNHElfB Offf,¥ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-04-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

TOP SECRET 

24
DIR 

'l'BRUr c/s 

Classitied lbcuments 1n !'osaesaion or V1111em .... Friedman 

SIC 5· DEC 1958 

1. .lt the reciuest. ot the Deputy ntrector .. t.be Director ot Security contacted 

Mr. Priedman and augested that since he ant1c1pe.tes beiag out ot the city f'or an 

extended :per1od ot time, the A#,f!ncy class1:fied documenta in hie ,PO&session ehould 

be maintained at 118A tor aatekeeping until his return. Mr. J.l'r1edman 1ndicated 

that he vould be J.ea"fing the c1t;y- Bbort~ atter 1 January 1959 and asreed that 

det1n1te pl&Da should be _mac!e to J>ick \W the claesif'ied documents il01Det1me during 

the week of' 29 Decern'ber. Mr. Priec!man "IOiced m obJect1on regarding Ageney cJ..aas1-

fied. documents in lits .:possession. He clid indicate that be has a cons1derable amount 

ot material "tdlich ia historical and was once classitied. It bas since been declaaaif'ied and subsequentl.1' 1 OD the basis ot a Deplrtment Gr Defense ruling_. cl.assifted 

-.atn. Jlr. :rdedman stated that this materi&l 'fts widely 41asem1.Dated 1lb.en it was 

Oeclasaitied aucl much ot it is in the public "amain. He :pointed out tbat th:lsmater1al. has been integrated into his 11brar7 and. it wul4 be ditticult -ror him 

to locate. Be ei;preased extreme rel.ucte.n.ce :tn ba"lir.g this material tur.a.ed over 

to the ~ency. 

2. :rt ~a.rs that this problem breaks lbw 1n tw parts. !he tirat 1e AgerJCy 

clasait1ed material which has been loaned to Mr. J'riec2man. This material should be 

easily ident:l:fiabl.e an! can be picked up and returned to the Agency by personnel 

t:rom Security v.lthomo ~ difflculty. Die other :problem deals with material acquired 

'b;y Mr. J':r:ledman o-ver m!lDT ;years. '!hie material prob&b~ !a not ea.Iii~ ident1:t1ab1e 

&114 some clitticulty 110uld be encountered in. locati!Jg 1t, 4etem1niDS its class1t1• 

cation, and :returnin,g lt to the Atr,eney. !l'tlis ia ,Pert:tcularly true 111 viev o'f nr. 

Jrtedman'a reluctance. 

S. WESLEY RE'lt~OLDS 

l)l;actor cf Szci:rity 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 05-13-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID GETZEN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

JUAN GARCIA ROMERO, Detention

Officer,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 20

- 17241

D.C. No. 3:20

- cv

- 08066

- SRB

- DMF

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021 * *

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

David Getzen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

. Erlin v . United States

,

364 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on the basis of the statute of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The pa nel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 20

- 17241

limitations); Resnick v. Hayes , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) ( dismissal under

28 U.S.C. § 1915A )

. We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Getzen ’s action because it is barred by

the applicable two

- year statute of limitations

. See Jones v. Blanas , 393 F.3d 918,

927 (9th Cir. 2004) (§ 1983 claims are governed by the forum state’s statute of

limitations for personal injury claims); TwoRivers v. Lewi s , 174 F.3d 987, 991

- 92

(9th Cir. 1999) ( the statute of limitations for § 1983 claims in Arizona is two

years)

.

Getzen’s motion for default (Docket Entry No. 15) and motion to

consolidate (Docket Entry No. 16) are denied.

AFFIRMED.
Petition for Exemption

Raul F Negrete

104 Ra cing Media 834 W Holly Dr Yuma, AZ 85364

I, Raul F Negrete , hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112

- 95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333. I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, 3D Robotics Iris+ Quad copter Aircraft, in order to provide services for profit to include aerial photography, aerial cinematography, aerial filming and photography for real estate, co nstruction firms, aerial mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, business advertising, promotional events, geological surveying, and

environmental studies.

The ability to provide these services to other local businesses and individuals in my community will benefit them by opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have before. Traditional methods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable options for the average consumer as they ar e costly and involve greater risks to everyone involved; i.e. the use of larger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing

the UAV/UAS the same results can be achieved with much safer conditions.

Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UA S, I will conduct a Pre

- Flight Safety Inspection. Only the manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers will perform any and all repairs. Flights will not take place over densely populated areas or private property without the owner’s permission. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line of sight and will not be flown near airports or above 400 feet. The FAA can be confident that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics, and Mr. Mike Lloyd & Associates, all of who have received Section 333 exemptions for comparable aircraft for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking e xemption are as follows: 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5); 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a); 14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c); 14 C.F.R 91.7(a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2); 14C.F.R. 91.109(a);14 C.F.R. 91.119;

14 C.F.R. 91.121; 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 91.405(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1); 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2}; 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included User Manual, Preflight Check List and Flight Safety Guidelines

I t ruly thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely, Raul F. Negrete 104 Racing Media

https://3drobotics.com/wp

- content/uploads/2015/02/IRIS

- Plus

- Operation

- Manual

- vH

- web.pdf

https://3drobotics.com/wp

- content/uploads/2015/04/IRIS

- Plus

- Flight

- Checklist

- vB.pdf

https://3drobotics.com/kb/safety/
# CE2004084EN.01016701.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/167 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/167

---

(2004/C 84 E/0205)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0139/04

by Ilda Figueiredo (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(26 January 2004)

Subject:   Financial support for undersea optic-fibre cable link for the islands of Flores and Corvo (Azores)

Subject:

An undersea optic-fibre cable link, co-funded by the Community, now connects all parts of Portugal except for the islands of Flores and Corvo in the Azores Autonomous Region. This state of affairs constitutes serious discrimination against the residents of those islands in one of the Community's most remote regions.

Can the Commission provide information on possible Community support, especially financial, for constructing an undersea optic-fibre cable link for the islands of Flores and Corvo?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(23 February 2004)

(23 February 2004)

The fibre-optic undersea cable linking the Azores to the mainland and the fibre-optic undersea cable between the islands (except Flores and Corvo) were part-financed by the Regis II Community Initiative. The former cost approximately EUR 16,6 million, the latter approximately EUR 12,5 million. These projects received part-financing of EUR 12,5 million and EUR 9,35 million respectively from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). REGIS II was a Community Initiative during the 1994-1999 programming period.

Submitting applications and allocating finance came under the responsibility of the regional authorities, whose aim was to develop as many projects as possible as efficiently as possible. Flores and Corvo have a combined population of 4 400 and are 140 nautical miles (about 200 kilometres) from Faial, the nearest other island, and some 500 kilometres from the most populated island (Saint Miguel). Due to the cost of providing Flores and Corvo with a fibre-optic link, it was decided to use alternative technical means (wireless data link and satellite).

This type of project could be eligible for support under the POSI operational programme, but the choice of projects for approval also has to consider their cost-effectiveness in relation to existing and foreseeable traffic and take into account the results of the alternative solutions available. Approval of the projects submitted rests with the programme manager and the managing unit (at national level) taking into account inter alia the priorities set, the selection criteria laid down and the project's economic viability so as to maximise the operational programme's effectiveness while complying with the rules in force, including those on competition.

The Commission is currently also examining the question of remotest regions' links with the rest of the Union and ways of reducing their inaccessibility, with a view to responding to the memorandum which Portugal, France and Spain sent to the Commission in June 2003.

---
Exhibit 32.1

** **

** **
| **Certification of CEO and CFO**                  |
|---------------------------------------------------|
| **Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**           |
| **As Adopted Pursuant to**                        |
| **Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002** |

 

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties Fund XVI (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.

 

 
|   |       /s/Steven D. Cordes |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name: Steven D. Cordes                             |
|   | Date: August 12, 2009                              |
|   |                                               |
|   |      /s/Stephen B. Waters |
|   | Name: Stephen B. Waters                            |
|   | Date: August 12, 2009                              |

 

 

This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
- - -------------------

CCI AG 

.- REF ID:A67022 

D1lWtol" 

ai.:..rch La1n1'!to1-:,· vf ZJ..~...n)!1.toa 

itarmc-.hu.set.ts InatJ.fiuto or teah."»lna ~o, ,~,~:>t.ts 

I mlr:nwl.Gd:e w1 th MtV t.ha.'1ka raoeipt 

of a GOS!"/ ot •J. atbli~ph7 ot llttGimD.UOQ 

'r~J I" ft'lti..Xooted \y M i."l IQ' '.l.et.W of 

2?. --· 

4-'tLJ.T.Aftf 1. nll::Jr~tl 

Spocl&l. J.asiatant. 

C/S 

S/ASST 

M/R• Selt-sxplanat4r1" ~- ~ '--~~ ~-J cJ'S:"J.. L. 62--e....._\ --;--3 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-20-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6116

TERRY HARRIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus SHERIFF DAWSON, Williamsburg Sheriff; PAULK, Head of Medical, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-98-325-2) Submitted: April 15, 1999 Decided: April 20, 1999 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Terry Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Terry Harris appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint in which he alleged that prison officials provided inadequate medicalcare. The district court properly assessed a filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)(A) (1994), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Harris failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
~ 0 

0 

REF ID:A66820 

Lieut.. Col.onal .Pbllip a. EV'an81 USA? 

Aaais~ Dep~ Cbiei' ~ St.at.t', Cperats.waa 

United .5ta.t.es Air Poree Jeourity 3erYJ.ce 

Brocks Ail' Force oue, 1'exaa 

Dear Phll.1 

A minor lllneu lla.s delayed a more prompt. ~ to 10ur aice 

latter of 17 January, .rritten at ti..o time ot t.r.e t.enaio.at.ion ct '7f'U:-

asuigmaent as Deput7 (;h:iat oi Sta£!, Sac"'191Q. 

Your kind words or appNCia:t1on o! 3uch u:sist:ince ac it baa 

been 117 good 1'ort.une to be abl.e tu o.fter ~c Seeurity ::ervice L"l tba 

past. two 7eara are grato.f\il.ly ruc11J.vad, tt~ut;:'l : am sure the~ i1.attor 

!te as to ti» ext.eat. o£ that &.SGistance. 

I certainly echo your :-.opo t.!oa!. ;.re ~ ;cntinua to reta.iJ: the 

close parsor..al. trieadship we llav~ ou:.Ut. and I laok tcrlil.ud to r.:now:lng 

t.be ties in l~, 'WileD l: ~;,ope t.o ~i~ip<lt.o i.'l the :or.:l!IWU.ca.t.iar..s 

securit.7 ot!icera• contenmca. 

'tiit.4 COl'd1al. greet.lngs, ! all"" 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 10-25-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
EXHIBIT 21
                              PRESIDENT CASINOS, INC.
                             SCHEDULE OF SUBSIDIARIES


                                                    State or Jurisdiction
           Name                               of Incorporation or Organization

The Connelly Group, L.P.                                  Delaware

President Riverboat Casino-Missouri, Inc.                 Missouri

The President Riverboat Casino-Mississippi, Inc.          Mississippi

President Riverboat Casino-Iowa, Inc.                     Iowa

TCG/Blackhawk, Inc.                                       Iowa

PRC Holdings Corporation                                  Delaware

PRC Management, Inc.                                      Pennsylvania

President Riverboat Casino-Philadelphia, Inc.             Pennsylvania

PRC Louisiana, Inc.                                       Louisiana

President Riverboat Casino-New York, Inc.                 Delaware

President Mississippi Charter Corporation                 Mississippi

PRCX Corporation                                          Delaware

Broadwater Hotel, Inc.                                    Mississippi

President Broadwater, LLC                                 Mississippi

Vegas Vegas, Inc.                                         Mississippi
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
COMPANY'S DECEMBER 31, 1997 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          23,393
<SECURITIES>                                    14,385
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,688
<ALLOWANCES>                                       454
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,631
<PP&E>                                           4,480
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,080
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,681
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,938
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            81
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,885
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,681
<SALES>                                         19,662
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,639
<CGS>                                            3,673
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,314
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                34,901
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  31
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (11,421)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        56
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,477)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (11,477)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.48)
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Bureau of Prisons

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Prisons, Justice.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal inmates in Fiscal Year 2014 was $30,619.85 ($83.89 per day). (Please note: There were 365 days in FY 2014.) The average annual cost to confine an inmate in a Residential Re-entry Center for Fiscal Year 2014 was $28,999.25 ($79.45 per day).

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         March 10, 2015.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Office of General Counsel, Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First St. NW., Washington, DC 20534.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sarah Qureshi, (202) 307-2105.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

28 CFR part 505 allows for assessment and collection of a fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal inmates. We calculate this fee by dividing the number representing Bureau of Prisons facilities' monetary obligation (excluding activation costs) by the number of inmate-days incurred for the preceding fiscal year, and then by multiplying the quotient by 365. Under § 505.2, the Director of the Bureau of Prisons determined that, based upon fiscal year 2014 data, the fee to cover the average cost of incarceration for Federal inmates in Fiscal Year 2014 was $30,619.85 ($83.89 per day). (Please note: There were 365 days in FY 2014.) The average annual cost to confine an inmate in a Residential Re-entry Center for Fiscal Year 2014 was $28,999.25 ($79.45 per day).

Charles E. Samuels, Jr.,

Director, Bureau of Prisons.

[FR Doc. 2015-05437 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 4410-05-P
Dear Ting: 

- REF I-D:A6883f1 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

WASHINGTON 25, D. C. 

ll February 1954 

Quite some time ago it was m:r pleasure to attend 

one of your current intelligence briefings. Since that 

time, and at my request., I have been regularly receiving 

the OCI Briefing Notices. 

The consideration shown in my behalf in this regard 

is greatly appreciated. However, due to the pressure at 

business I find Jl\V'Self quite usually unable to take advantase ot the opportunities presented. 

I realize that for each recipient of such notices 

there is an associ.8.ted a,dm1ni strative burden. ·Therefore 

I feel I should no longer be included on the regular 

distribution list tor these- Notices and thus save your 

staff a little bit ot the burden.they have in this regard. 

Mr. Huntington Sheldon 

Deputy Director, CIA 

Sincerely, 

nLLIAH F. FRIBJJWI 

Special Assistant 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 05-19-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
REF ID:A58834 

19 Septeaber 194; 

!01 Chief, Opera.ting Services Dlv!eion 

Rt.u!iel'OWI requellts have been made ~or photographic prints or atatf' 

groups free nagat1wa now 1D the .tiloa ~ Laborato17 Branch. !here ia 

no objection to Dlldng a tempora.r;y rel.mae of euoh negritiwa ot those 

ataf't groups as my be desired 'Iv' the intareatoct d1'da1cm or brancli 

prov!4ed m expense 1• incurred to tho Oovarment a.rd that 210 oJ.aSBi• 

tied JDQ.terial. 18 llhown. this 111 interpreted also to !ll8t\!1 a BO'l.14 

ba.okground auoh aa treea o:r the aide ot a bulldblg Sn Which the BUi'rOUJJd• 

f.ng area !a not apparent. 

JOBR r. lfAT .. IER 

Lt. Colcmel.1 Signal. Corps' 

Executive attiae:r 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 07-25-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a