alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                    Exhibit 21.0

                  FIDELITY NATIONAL INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.

                           Subsidiaries as of 12/31/02


<TABLE>
<S>                                                       <C>
Business World Travel, Inc.                               Pennsylvania

Comstock Net Services, Inc.                               Delaware

Eastern Financial Systems, Inc.                           Pennsylvania

Eastern Software Corporation                              Pennsylvania

Eastern Software Corporation of California                Pennsylvania

EcoSearch Acquisition Corporation                         Delaware

EcoSearch Environmental Resources, Inc.                   Indiana

Ensite Corporation of Denver                              Colorado

E/RISK Information Solutions, Inc.                        California

Fidelity National Credit Services, Inc.                   New York

Fidelity National Information Services Canada, Inc.       Ontario, Canada

Fidelity National Tax Service, Inc.                       California

FNIS Flood of California, LLC                             Delaware

FNIS Flood Group, LLC                                     Delaware

FNIS Flood Services, LP                                   Delaware

FNIS Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.                 Delaware

FNIS Management Services, Inc.                            Delaware

FNIS MLS Services, Inc.                                   Delaware

FNIS Services, Inc.                                       Delaware

Geosure, Inc.                                             Delaware

Geosure, LP                                               New York
</TABLE>



                                       1

<PAGE>

<TABLE>
<S>                                                       <C>
Hansen Quality, LLC   (55%)                               California

International Data Management Corporation                 California

L/D Exchange, Inc.                                        Delaware

Market Intelligence, Inc.                                 Massachusetts

Micro General Corporation                                 Delaware

MGEN Intellectual Property Holdings, Inc.                 Delaware

MGEN Services Corp.                                       Delaware

NRC Insurance Services, Inc.                              North Carolina

RealEC Technologies, Inc. (47.40%)                        Delaware

Risco, Inc.                                               Kansas

SoftPro Merger Corp.                                      California

Vista DMS, Inc.                                           Delaware

Vista Environmental Information, Inc.                     Delaware
</TABLE>



                                       2
REF ID:A67869 

:li81Rl8fL9 se:uv11Hi01Mlkll 

HS!Rfe!f.9 • setJRfff Jll~"ttOM. 18 lovembcr 19)2 

JIIH>P.AllDUM FOB '!RE CHIEF 1 SF.COOT!' C011'f.IOL DIYISIOlf 

SOBJECT1 Addi\ional Clea1""41C88 Eor SCAMP .00 J.chieoey Board. 

l. ,,_ tollowill{ .td1 Uonal 3rsons ue being considered as cami• 

dates for nut ~r•a a•11ar (SCA.MP)• 

TUCKER_, Albert W1Uia 

n.o.B. - 28 November l90S 

p,.o.B ..... Oahawa,. Ol'ltario,, Canada 

Pntaent addnaa: Prof. of Mathena.tics., Princeton Univerait7_. 

Princeton. New Jersey 

SP.RHCEil, Donald c .. D.t'.L - :r.o.B. • 

Pn11ent addresss Prot. ct Jlfathemt.ios, Princeton Urxtver311J', 

Prlnceton, Re-• Jersq 

BROCK1 R. H. 

D.O.B. • 

P.o.B ..... Present address' a..aooiate Proteasor at Ma.themat.ics, 

Un1vars1 t¥ ot Willcons1n,. Madiaoa, W1acons1n 

PALL, Pl'Ot • Ool'don 

D.O.B. ""' 26 DocotlbeJ' l.907 

P.o.B. - 'W1nnepeg,. Kanitoba.,. Canada 

Pn1ent aidressi Prof. of HathemlltLcs, Illinois Inst.1. tute ot TachnolOQ",, 

Chicago• Illinois 

RISER, 'R. J. 

D.O.,B- ... P.O.B. - Present A.ddress1 Prof,. ot 1'.athmatictJ, Ohio state Univeraj:tv, 

________ co_iJ.,_•m_ibus_,, Ohio PL 86-36/50 USC 3605 

1~1~·~ ~t'i 

......... Pte.......--SE!Il---.-t.-a ..... d .... dl"U--s-, -1 ...... tl.......-oriil-----Bureau ot st:uxlards, Wuhingt.on,, D. c. 

2. •· Retorenco 1• tmde t.o t.he list ot names funllshed JOU 1n 11¥ 

.-ol'Qndl,11'1 ot 6 llovembei-1 1N1R1e tnibject. On that. liet. the D.o.s. mi 

P .. o.B. forl lean now be suppl.1ed1 

=REStRlCTlB '~ 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 06-12-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
··~ .. 

REF ID:A67869 

RESTRICftD _,.., .. 

Rltft'flf:8i'tl:J 

• • t • I aa.I 18 Jlovarber 1952 

b. 811111.lar data tor Mr. 1'homas lleei'Vs on tho •alQO list are not 

19t available_. but. will be obtainm as aoon ae posa!.blo • Tb.is also 

applies to thl!'e& ca:ses on tho llet now being tcN.uoded,. 

/ .s I WILLIAM F. PR.Ilil»'.AH 

I Consult.mt. 

_.&JJ1 ~~(J?). ~'-

2 

RESTRICTED 

--· 

.-

... " 

.. 

_,. 

. 

..
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED August 5, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-51346 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus MARTHA ALICIA RUBIO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:04-CR-639-ALL-DB

-------------------- Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Martha Alicia Rubio appeals her jury-trial convictions for importation of and possession with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 952, and 960. Rubio argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she knew that marijuana was hidden in the furniture that she was transporting in her vehicle. She contends that the evidence was, at best, in equipoise.No. 04-51346 -2- Although the jury may ordinarily infer the defendant’s guilty knowledge from his control over a drug-laden vehicle, if the drugs are contained in a hidden compartment, as in this case, this court requires additional circumstantial evidence that demonstrates guilty knowledge. United States v. Villarreal , 324 F.3d 319, 324 (5th Cir. 2003). Rubio exhibited nervous behavior during the canine search of her vehicle. Based on the actions of Rubio in this regard, the jury could have reasonably inferred that Rubio was nervous concerning the discovery of marijuana in the furniture. See United States v. Ortega Reyna , 148 F.3d 540, 544 (5th Cir. 1998). Rubio’s statements to the federal agents were inconsistent with the evidence presented at trial. Inconsistent statements also provide evidence of guilty knowledge. United States v. DiazCarreon , 915 F.2d 951, 954-55 (5th Cir. 1990). Finally, the amount and value of the marijuana discovered in the furniture in her possession supports the jury’s finding of guilty knowledge. The jury could have rationally inferred that Rubio would not be entrusted with such valuable cargo is she had not been a knowing participant in a drug-smuggling scheme. Villarreal , 324 F.3d at 324. The evidence presented at trial was sufficient to allow a rational jury to find that Rubio had knowledge of the marijuana in her possession. Ortega Reyna , 148 F.3d at 543. Accordingly, Rubio’s convictions are AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6103

LESTER BARNETT, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

BOB SMITH, Superintendent; MICHAEL F. EASLEY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-421-3-MU)

Submitted: March 22, 2001 Decided: March 30, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lester Barnett, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Lester Barnett, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Barnett v. Smith, No. CA-95-421-

3-MU (W.D.N.C. Oct. 18, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1643 Reported in Senate (RS)]

                                                       Calendar No. 133
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1643

  To require a report on actions to secure the safety and security of 
                dissidents housed at Camp Liberty, Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 23, 2015

Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mrs. Shaheen) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

                             June 25, 2015

               Reported by Mr. Corker, with an amendment
  [Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require a report on actions to secure the safety and security of 
                dissidents housed at Camp Liberty, Iraq.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring the Safety and Security of 
Iranian Dissidents in Iraq Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REPORT ON ACTIONS TO SECURE THE SAFETY AND SECURITY OF 
              DISSIDENTS HOUSED AT CAMP LIBERTY, IRAQ.

    Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary of State shall certify, in writing, to the committee on 
Foreign Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of 
the House of Representatives whether or not the Central Government of 
Iraq is taking appropriate and sufficient actions to ensure the safety 
and security of dissidents housed at Camp Liberty, Iraq.
     Not later than 30 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of State shall submit to the Committee on Foreign 
Relations of the Senate and the Committee on Foreign Affairs of the 
House of Representatives a written report setting forth an assessment 
of whether the Central Government of Iraq is taking appropriate and 
sufficient actions to ensure the safety and security of dissidents 
housed at Camp Liberty, Iraq. 
                                                       Calendar No. 133

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1643

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

  To require a report on actions to secure the safety and security of 
                dissidents housed at Camp Liberty, Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 25, 2015

                       Reported with an amendment
```
#### Marvin, Respondent, vs. The Town of Jacobs, Appellant.

*April 30*

*May 20, 1890.*

*Town orders drawn on road fund.*

There being no law authorizing the establishment of a separate road fund, town orders pm-porting to be drawn upon such a fund are payable out of the general fund of the town.

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for *Ashland*County.

Action upon the several town orders, payment of which *32bad been, refused. Each of said orders was in form like the following:

“ $10.00 Eoad Okdee. No. 302.

“ (Hidden, Ashland Co., Wis., July 20, 1889.

“ *To the Treasurer of the, Town of Taoobs:*Pay to II. Xal-vring or bearer, the sum of ten dollars out of any moneys in the road fund not otherwise appropriated, being for inspecting road. O. W. Kline, Chairman.

“ Countersigned: P. J. ScalloN, Clerk.”

The defendant appeals from an order overruling a general demurrer to the complaint.

For the appellant there was a brief by *Cole & O’Keefe,*attorneys, and *Tomhms, Merrill <&*Smith, of counsel, and oral argument by *Dublee A. Cole*and *W. M. Tomldns.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Mead <& Dixon,*and oral argument by *A. K. Dixon.*

Cole, C. J.

This is a suit against the town upon town orders. The objection to the complaint is that the orders are drawn upon a particular fund, — that is, the road fund,— and that it does not appear that there was any money belonging to that hind to pay them. The orders must be deemed payable out of the general fund of the town. We do not understand that there is any provision of law which authorizes the town officers to establish a separate road fund. The orders, therefore, were payable out of the general fund of the town. The fact that the orders stated that they were payable out of the road fund not otherwise appropriated must be understood as merely designating the purpose for which the orders were drawn, and for the convenience of the officers of the town in tracing and adjusting their accounts. *Montague v. Horton,*12 Wis. 668.

The other objections to the complaint are disposed of by *33tbe decisions in *Brown v. Town Board, ante,*p. 27, and *Brown v. Jacobs, ante,*p. 29.

*By the*Court.— Tbe order of tbe circuit court is affirmed, and tbe cause remanded for further proceedings.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of TVI Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jeffery C. Kordela, Corporate Controller and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |                                                        
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 15, 2005 |  | /s/ JEFFERY C. KORDELA                                 
|                       |  | Jeffery C. Kordela                                     
|                       |  | Corporate Controller and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Trinity Biotech plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin Tansley, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

|                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | 
|                       
|/s/ KEVIN TANSLEY*     
|Kevin Tansley          
|Chief Financial Officer

April 6, 2012



|* | The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Companys offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# CE2004084EN.01031901.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/319 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/319

---

(2004/C 84 E/0366)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0149/04

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   Revenue from denationalisation used to cover current expenditure

Subject:

The Greek Government holds account number 234 339/0 with the Bank of Greece, into which is paid the revenue obtained from the denationalisation of public enterprises. Finance Ministry documents put before the Hellenic Parliament have revealed that between 2001 and 20 September 2003, EUR 3,9 billion was drawn from that account to cover current government expenditure.

The Finance Ministry documents refer to specific funds for the Olympic Games, the staff insurance fund of the Greek Telecommunications Organisation (OTE), the Skaramanga shipyards, the Thessaloniki Water Company, the ‘Bambakos’ organisation, hospitals, and meeting the needs of the Public Company for Transferable Securities (DEKA), etc.

Under the terms of the relevant regulations, can the revenue from denationalisation be used to cover current budget expenditure or only to reduce the public debt? What measures does the Commission propose to take in this matter?

Answer given by Mr Solbes Mira on behalf of the Commission

(13 February 2004)

(13 February 2004)

In the context of the Community budgetary surveillance procedures, government accounts — notably the government deficit/surplus — should be compiled according to the rules laid down in the European System of National and Regional Accounts (ESA95) (1).

1

According to the ESA95 accounting rules, privatisation proceeds — including proceeds from indirect privatisations — are financial receipts (see ESA95 paragraphs 4.165(g) and 5.86). Therefore, such receipts are not taken into account in the calculation of the general government deficit/surplus. This means that if an EU government decides to increase expenditure, and finances such spending through a privatisation, its deficit will increase.

Since the government debt that is relevant for budgetary surveillance procedure is defined in gross terms (2) — that is, without netting government assets such as shares in public enterprises — privatisation lead to a reduction in the government debt level insofar as they reduce the government debt issuance or allow the government to buy back debt.

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 of 25 June 1996 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the Community, OJ L 310, 30.11.1996.

1

(2)  The general government debt is defined in Article 1(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 of 22 November 1993 on the application of the Protocol on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty establishing the European Community, OJ L 332, 31.12.1993.

2

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 9, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-20267 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE PINEDA-GARDUNO, also known as Jose Garduno Pineda, also known as Jose G. Pineda, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:04-CR-369-ALL

-------------------- Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Jose Pineda-Garduno (“Pineda”) appeals the sentence imposed following entry of his guilty plea to a charge of being found illegally in the United States after he had been removed subsequent to his conviction for an aggravated felony. The district court sentenced Pineda to 57 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. Pineda’s sole issue on appeal is a challenge to the validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), andNo. 05-20267 -2- the use of his prior conviction to increase his sentence. Pineda asserts that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are unconstitutional because they are treated as sentencing factors rather than as elements of the offense. Pineda concedes that his argument is foreclosed by circuit precedent and admits that he raises the argument merely to preserve it for Supreme Court review. As Pineda concedes, his arguments are foreclosed. See United States v. Izaguirre-Flores , 405 F.3d 270, 277-78 (5th Cir.), cert. denied , 126 S. Ct. 253 (2005) ; United States v. Mancia-Perez , 331 F.3d 464, 470 (5th Cir. 2003). The Supreme Court in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000), did not overrule Almendarez-Torres , and we must follow AlmendarezTorres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Mancia-Perez , 331 F.3d at 470 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

. AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of TVI  Corporation(the  "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),I,  Richard V. Priddy,
Chief Executive Officer, of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. $ 1350,
as adopted pursuant to $ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
company.


/s/ Richard V. Priddy
    Chief Executive Officer
    May 14, 2003