alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM VISTA
INFORMATION SOLUTION, INC.'S CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1997
AND RELATED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1997.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                         341,781
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,780,966
<ALLOWANCES>                                   191,500
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,203,277
<PP&E>                                       4,207,710
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,810,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,378,886
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,559,906
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      7,677
<COMMON>                                       188,819
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,151,288
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,378,886
<SALES>                                     10,391,453
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            10,391,453
<CGS>                                        2,317,982
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               12,183,675
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,486,296
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (13,409)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,465,711
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,596,500)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,596,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,596,500)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.87)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.87)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          30,070
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               137,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    621,626
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          62,293
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            62,481
<LOANS>                                        751,116
<ALLOWANCE>                                     17,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,622,787
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,380,067
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             33,534
<LONG-TERM>                                     38,843
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        56,067
<OTHER-SE>                                     114,276
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,622,787
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 54,689
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               39,525
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     7
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                94,221
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              40,300
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,629
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           51,292
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 22,979
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 34,133
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      21,352
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,352
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.51
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.48
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.50
<LOANS-NON>                                     12,359
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,088
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                11,188
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,776
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,829
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,463
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               17,410
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            17,410
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1746 

To require the Office of Personnel Management to provide complimentary, 

comprehensive identity protection coverage to all individuals whose personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data 

breaches at Federal agencies. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 9, 2015 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Ms. MIKULSKI, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. KAINE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To require the Office of Personnel Management to provide 

complimentary, comprehensive identity protection coverage to all individuals whose personally identifiable information was compromised during recent data breaches 

at Federal agencies. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing the Effects 

5 of the Cyberattack on OPM Victims Emergency Response 

6 Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘RECOVER Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1746 IS

1 SEC. 2. IDENTITY PROTECTION COVERAGE FOR INDIVID2 UALS AFFECTED BY FEDERAL AGENCY DATA 

3 BREACHES. 

4 (a) DEFINITION.—In this section, the term ‘‘affected 

5 individual’’ means any individual whose personally identi6 fiable information was compromised during— 

7 (1) the data breach of personnel records of cur8 rent and former Federal employees, at a network 

9 maintained by the Department of the Interior, that 

10 was announced by the Office of Personnel Manage11 ment on June 4, 2015; or 

12 (2) the data breach of systems of the Office of 

13 Personnel Management containing information re14 lated to the background investigations of current, 

15 former, and prospective Federal employees, and of 

16 other individuals. 

17 (b) IDENTITY PROTECTION COVERAGE.—The Office 

18 of Personnel Management shall provide to each affected 

19 individual complimentary identity protection coverage 

20 that— 

21 (1) is not less comprehensive than the com22 plimentary identify protection coverage that the Of23 fice provided to affected individuals before the date 

24 of enactment of this Act; 

25 (2) is effective for the remainder of the life of 

26 the individual; and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1746 IS

1 (3) includes not less than $5,000,000 in iden2 tity theft insurance. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7561

ROBERT LEE WHITE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

EDSEL TAYLOR, Warden of MacDougall Correctional Institution; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE

OF SOUTH CAROLINA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District Judge.

(CA-97-2378-3-23BC)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 12, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert L. White, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. White seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. See White v. Taylor, No. CA-97-2378-3-23BC

(D.S.C. Sept. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                    Consent

                                                                Exhibit No. 23.1

We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Independent Auditors"
and "Selected Financial Data" in the Registration Statement Form S-4 and related
proxy statement/prospectus of CTC Communications Corp. for the registration of
13,907,704 shares of its common stock and 666,666 shares of Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock and to the incorporation by reference therein of our report
dated May 19, 1999, except for Notes 7 and 10, as to which the date is June 30,
1999, with respect to the financial statements and schedule of CTC
Communications Corp. included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for the year
ended March 31, 1999, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
July 30, 1999
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

I, Frank Cesario, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of ISCO International, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) for the registrant and have: 

 

a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; 

 

b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation; 

 

c. disclosed by this annual report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that was materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the Audit Committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions): 

 

a. all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 003 56 - CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant,

v. LEE FRANCIS , Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Nueces County, Texas



## ORDE R OF ABATEMENT
Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Perkes

Order Per Curiam Appell ee ’ s counsel, Simon B. Purnell , has filed a motion requesting to withdraw as
counsel and a motion for extension of time to file the brief . According to h is motion to withdraw, good cause exists for h im to withdraw because he has moved from Nueces County, Texas to Cook County, Illinois and is currently practicing at a civil defense law2

firm. Adequate reason for the discharge of counsel and appointment of ne w counsel rests within the sound discretion of the trial court. Carroll v. State , 176 S.W.3d 249, 255 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2004, pet. ref'd). In those circumstances where the appointment of substitute counsel may be necessary, an appellate cour t, when faced with a motion to withdraw, should abate the proceeding to the trial court for determination of this issue. Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this order. A ppellee ’s motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine whether appell ee ’ s court

- appointed attorney should remain as appell ee 's counsel; and, if not, whether appell ee is entitled to new appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that there is no reason to discharge appell ee ’ s current appointed attorney and appoint substitute counsel, the court shall enter an order to that effect. If the trial court determines that new counsel should be appointed,
th e name, address, telephone number, and state bar number of newly appointed counsel shall be included in the order appointing counsel. The trial court shall further cause its order to be included in a supplemental clerk's record to be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the date of this order.
It is so ordered. PER CURIAM
Do Not Publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2 (b)

. D elivered and filed the 14 th day of November, 2014

.
.. 

...... =..- • 

. ' 

REF ID:A63538 

Prote•llOl' A. M. Gleason 

161 B&Deock Street 

CUib:'icSae 39, Maaeachueetta 

:oee,,,. ArJfll1"t 

I u men indebted to 70\l tatt 1rJUr ftX'Y tnte:re.ths letter 

ot • J&DJJll.r1. 

What I vail4 Ulre to 9USP•t u t.bat 10u Yrit.e a briet' Jl*l*l" 

'1rl. the :problem which l praed. .mt. vbich then ooul.4 be pl'.bliahed. Sn 

IOZr.le ISA. -4!.um such u the quarier~ report gotten out b7 DA.-'4 

®.their Naarcbel. ft U l'OUible J011 nd.gb.t want to J,iUblilh 

a ,paper in__,.. unclaHitied •tber.aa.tical Jourtal, ~ :t ... no ~ 'Vb;f' it eoul4n •t be <laao that WiY• llU.t it 10\.l are DOt 

tutticient:t., iutereated, .,._.ra vc:W.4 be 'ft1'1 &la4 to 'tfOl'k up a 

ieper vhich voul4 meke WIO ot tbe tarmula JO~ cited and abov alOIAe 

applications. 

n..e le~• lcQQv ycur tbotiaht• or v1abta 1u. thi• reprd.1 "° tbat x can tell IWraar•· 111 the -.o.ttme, plee10 accept '111¥ 

'beat -thanka ft:r • (Uick u4 DMt aolutton to the problem. 

With belt ~' I a, 

pproved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 

------ ... .., 

i. 

-t • ' I 

~ 

-

;f,. 

-

.. ... 

~ 

• F 

.. 

r ...
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,469,515
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               28,043,705
<ALLOWANCES>                                 6,097,643
<INVENTORY>                                  1,348,380
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,568,260
<PP&E>                                      26,689,650
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,045,982
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              54,912,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,470,043
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    21,907,546
<OTHER-SE>                                    (748,653)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                54,912,478
<SALES>                                     17,990,547
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            17,990,547
<CGS>                                       12,586,967
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,215,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             212,083
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (774,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (308,505)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (465,855)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.3)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.3)



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Science Dynamics Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Joe Noto, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


May 17, 2005                        /s/ Joe Noto
                                    -----------------------
                                    Joe Noto
                                    Chief Financial Officer
# CE2004088EN.01016701.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/167 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/167

---

(2004/C 88 E/0175)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0049/04

by Camilo Nogueira Román (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(20 January 2004)

Subject:   EU aid to Iran to tackle the tragic consequences of the Bam earthquake

Subject:

What is the nature of the EU's relations with the Iranian government following the major disaster at Bam? How much aid has the EU sent to Bam? What will the EU contribute to enable the cities and villages affected to resume normal life as far as possible? Does the Commission have the resources required to aid communities affected by such disasters, commensurate with the Union's economic capacity?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(5 March 2004)

(5 March 2004)

The EU has for many years explored ways of developing wider political and economic relations with Iran. To that effect, the EU launched negotiations in December 2002 on a Trade and Cooperation Agreement as well as on an Agreement on Political Dialogue and the Fight against Terrorism. Almost simultaneously, a dialogue on Human Rights was established with Iran. Working groups on trade and investment, and energy, exist since 1999. The EU continues to base its approach towards Iran on the global concept of Comprehensive Dialogue, introduced in 1998.

Following the tragic earthquake on 26 December 2003, the Commission through its Humanitarian Aid Office (ECHO) promptly reacted by allocating, on 27 December 2003, EUR 2,3 million for the most urgent humanitarian needs. The funds have been channelled through the Red Cross movement and international non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Already on 26 December 2003, the EU Civil protection and Monitoring and Information Centre, hosted by the Commission, dispatched and coordinated the Search and Rescue teams' response of Member States, the European Economic Area (EEA), Candidate and Acceding Countries.

On 18 February 2004 the Commission adopted a follow up decision of EUR 6,2 million for continued humanitarian aid. As before, funds will be disbursed through the Red Cross and international NGOs, as well as through the United Nations agencies. The sectors targeted will be health, water and sanitation and psycho-social care with a focus on the most vulnerable, in particular children.

The Commissioner in charge of development and cooperation visited Iran 18/19 February 2004. He had talks with the government, the Iranian Red Crescent and United Nations organisations in Teheran and visited Bam where he met the organisations working in the field.

---