alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
~~--------------.......... .. 

REF ID:A63578 

. ·-

~tion llo. 58-LY11/PR-158o 

SIGPQ-A8 

Attn: Mr. Curr.n 

ma 30 Apr 58 

F. G. T.ate/4057 /dm ... 

'lbe bid on Quotation :mo. 58-LYR/~-158o dated 9 April 1958 u aubmitted by 

llr. Wllllma F. i'rJedmn 1e considered acceptable by the Ottice ~ Training Services. 

J.POR THE DIRECTOR CJF TRADOJ(G: 

JOBB Jt. LDUi I JR. 

Chief, Pl.aria u4. '!Bcbni~s Group 

@'pp roved for Release by NSA on 11-18-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

--------=-

\ I 

'\ 

\ 

"\ 

I 

,'j 

·\ 

,,, 

'i 

I, 

1\ 

I 

I 

i 

' I 

I__ ,\
4-- - ' ~.ll ....... 

~--~- --

.. .. -=-=- ...... ,;·M...-

- --..-.r- .. ·Er. - - r---= -~~ 

.. -- ~-.. _.,. . 

•·TI•~•-~ li!Jllili e.u.~. et "~ Al'Y. 

--~-'O.....i1t, ---\Id~ l, liohipn 

*" ;.an n.,~n.1 

.il"Wr" di"~~ "1\b ..- <ii N' cqU.....:.e3 t!ie s•Jett ot fl(/ 

... .wM.tion rd.th 1". J~l~n Oft .. oeea.11«\ of AL»,...,_\. TI.at 

.._ 

~ 

1111111-;-...._ I rim U!!~ ~" !• ~t~ion• m~ 1«\wn1\ \o t~w!.:-~ t.he ~A!bil!t., ot otterlnc ~ tln:as2aJ w.pport 

w ~ luati.an lariJ~e n&t!tttoe pzoJllCt\1 ~ul.d V&at. ii. DJ fed 

- !\# •--l4\J&4\. 

I •iWI\ .. i.JOl.l a~alt.. & ~ ~ r;r 'tM ~w:~ 

flt '1111 ~ .. il\\h & lio;t. or q-eot~ ~ti the ~ues ,.at '° ._ ~\94_, ~ a ~...Qo'.)WU ot t.b-a t-~lf a.d.;!. tpoo ""•'--;.\. Qf =-~; ~l~~~ ~~~ ;:::~ ;r=\·\lt-=•bl• ftlMrt::ll ,JlfoJeel .. 

- _,,.,. 

.....,., ' 

-~!t~ 

w.rttrt~tlb7/S MM¥ S2 Consul.tf211. ,, EX:t. ~9, 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-16~_2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352!>_.._.,. _ 

------ -- ---- -------------------~--=-~~~-U' ~~~-~v 

l 

I 

i 

I 

I 

l ~
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                         5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1000
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                 JUN-27-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                    DEC-28-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                      MAR-28-1997
<CASH>                                               1,194
<SECURITIES>                                           367
<RECEIVABLES>                                       19,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                           286
<INVENTORY>                                         25,343
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    50,856
<PP&E>                                              48,913
<DEPRECIATION>                                      22,706
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      78,443
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               17,818
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               963
<OTHER-SE>                                          50,799
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        78,443
<SALES>                                             33,718
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    33,718
<CGS>                                               27,561
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,919
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (104)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      59
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                       (717) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                          (881)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    164
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           164
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .02
        

</TABLE>
• 

:?1.ss !'.dna M'cElltOe · 

2919 $(m.t!l :·ttChanan Street Ar~ ~a 

Deal- ~aeu !Io:Enroe1 

REF ID : A68ji 0 

• 

!loceipt ·ot yoitl" loftW o! .23 Al\;.~t. 19~.3 '4th i.te 

:lnclo~ is ackncbrl.~. l at1. turninz the matter CRC" 

to. the !>ropel" ~ in our ?orsonnel 1'V'is1on, With 1:be 

. req~t .thnt 110 niv«t it bis _persoml -&.ttenti.on. 1 

slloul.d hoar tron ltl.r.l jJ} a ftN cJaya m1l wU.l. bG c:lad to 

let 1Q'll 1:.'lOW t!Jo ra.ul.t vhen ~ telephone l".te. . . ,· 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-15-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352d
# CE2004088EN.01022601.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/226 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/226

---

(2004/C 88 E/0229)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0795/04

by Patricia McKenna (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Derrybrien wind farm bogslide

Subject:

Further to the Commission's answer to my question P-3350/03 (1), the reports that were commissioned by ESB subsidiary, Hibernian Wind Power Ltd, and Galway County Council, just published, confirm the responsibility of the wind farm project for the major landslide, and also for several earlier small ones. They identify many areas of the site that are similarly at risk, thereby showing in particular that a landslide directly above the village cannot be excluded due to low stability levels. However, the two reports pay scant attention to the impact of dynamic forces on the peat, and most of the safety analysis appears to be based on static loadings only. Thus the effects of heavy truck and crane movements on floating roads, as well as those of explosives used on site, are effectively ignored. Furthermore, safety as examined is more concerned about on site risks, not off site. These reports are cross-referenced, and show a remarkable consistency, and it is known that the two sets of consultants met on this question, raising further doubts about their real independence.

1

To help secure the future of wind energy in Ireland, will the Commission now insist that the planning process be undertaken from the beginning, based on a proper and complete EIS relating to the actual project proposed, and also require that any continuation be conditional on a fresh planning approval? Will the Commission assist the locals in commissioning a truly independent study of the project and its impact, as they have proposed, with the primary aim of avoiding further environmental damage and injury or even loss of life, which would surely arise from a landslide above Derrybrien village?

Answer given by Mrs Wallström on behalf of the Commission

(27 April 2004)

(27 April 2004)

The Commission confirms that, in the framework of several complaints, it has received copies of the two reports referred to by the Honourable Member. It also confirms that it has received further extensive documentation relating to the various development consent procedures that have been followed in connection with the wind-farm project at Derrybrien. Pending the conclusion of its examination of these documents, it would be premature for the Commission to comment in detail on the appropriate next steps to take.

---

(1)  OJ C 78 E, 27.3.2004, p. 528.

1

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. IN13-15-000]

                    With respect to orders issued by the Commission on August 5, 2013 and May 15, 2014 in the above-captioned docket, with the exceptions noted below, the staff of the Office of Enforcement are designated as non-decisional in deliberations by the Commission in this docket. Accordingly, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2202 (2014), they will not serve as advisors to the Commission or take part in the Commission's review of any                           ( print page 10474)                        offer of settlement. Likewise, as non-decisional staff, pursuant to 18 CFR 385.2201 (2014), they are prohibited from communicating with advisory staff concerning any deliberations in this docket.                

Exceptions to this designation as non-decisional are:

Larry Gasteiger

James Owens

Justin Shellaway

Timothy Helwick

Eric Ciccoretti

Shawn Bennett

Jill Davis

Sebastian Krynski

Dated: February 19, 2015.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2015-03995 Filed 2-25-15; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
99-775.

#### Meeker v. Bituminous Cas. Corp.

Hamilton App. No. C-970977. Reported at 86 Ohio St.3d 1436, 713 N.E.2d 1048. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Douglas, J., dissents.
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT
UNDER THE HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
2008 FLEXIBLE INCENTIVE PLAN
 Agreement Grant Date Company Employee Plan
     Grant of RSUs RSUs Section 2 Section 3
  Section 3 First Restriction Period
 Section 5




---



##### 



Restrictions
 Section 7 Section 7 Section 2(a)
 Section 3
 Vesting
      Section 8
 Employment
 Delivery of Share Certificates; Compliance with Securities Laws Section 7
 2




---



##### 



Section 7 Section 3 Section 7
 Tax Consequences; Tax Withholding
 Section 3
  Forfeiture Event Following Vesting Section 3(a) Section 3 Restricted Shares Section 7 Second Restriction Period) Minimum Stockholding Obligation
 Section 3(a) Share Forfeiture
Obligation
 3




---



##### 



Section 5
 Section 7
 Section 5
 Changes in Stock Restriction Period
 Confidential Information
 4




---



##### 



Notices
 Amendments and Waivers
 No Right to Continued Service
 Confidentiality of Agreement
 Effect of Payment
 Agreement to Offset Section 7
 5




---



##### 



Successors and Assigns; Binding Effect
 Entire Agreement
 Interpretation
 Severability
 Employee Acknowledgment
 6




---



##### 



Compliance with Code Section 409A
  Survival of Certain Provisions
 Governing Law and Venue
 Signature in Counterparts
 EXPIRATION OF AGREEMENT
 [SIGNATURE PAGE TO RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARD AGREEMENT]
 7




---



##### 



DEFINITIONS APPENDIX TO AGREEMENT
 Bona Fide Retirement Prohibited Activity),
         A-1




---



##### 



Section 7
 Companys Market
 Competitive Business
 Involuntary Termination Without Cause
     A-2




---



##### 



Termination for Good
Reason.
  Parties Party
 Termination For Good Reason
      A-3
S. 

4L PROt'

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF THE 

ADMINISTRATOR The Honorable Brian Sandoval 

Governor of Nevada 

Chairman, Western Governors' Association 

1600 Broadway 

Suite 1700 

Denver, Colorado 80202 

Dear Governor Sandoval: 

Thank you for your letter of March 30, 2015, in which you ask the Environmental Protection Agency for 

increased consultation concerning regulatory efforts affecting tribal authority under the Clean Water 

Act. Specifically, you asked that the EPA consult further with states in the development of two potential 

EPA rules related to the treatment of tribes in a manner similar to a state. 

We share your commitment to working together as co-regulators. The EPA very much values this 

relationship and works hard to cultivate partnerships with states. Your letter recognizes the outreach we 

made to state associations in the fall of 2014 regarding these potential rulemaking efforts. We received a 

lot of valuable input from those interactions, which will be reflected in any subsequent actions, and we 

welcome additional thoughts. 

To this end, we are interested in engaging with the Western Governors' Association in the hope that you 

and your colleagues can facilitate a discussion among the states and with EPA before the agency issues 

any proposed rules. EPA staff has already connected with WGA staff, together with your representative 

to the WGA Staff Advisory Council, in order to identify ways we can move forward together, and we 

look forward to additional discussions. 

Again, thank you for your letter. If you have further questions or concerns, please contact me or your 

staff may contact Mark Rupp, Deputy Associate Administrator for Intergovernmental Relations, at 

rupp.markepa.gov or at 202-564-7178. 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Recycled Paper (20% Postconsumer)
,, ..... Ji:. 

e REF ID:A63870 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

FT. GEORGE G. MEADE, MD. 

Mr. William F. Friedman 

310 2nd Street, S. E. 

Washington, D. c. 

Dear Mr. Friedman: 

Serial: EXSAB 98-58 

2 October 1958 

The replies about the date for the next meeting of the 

NSA Scientific Advisory Board indicate that the meeting should 

be held December 4th and 5th. 

Would you, therefore, please keep those days available 

for the NSASAB meeting? 

Further details and an agenda will reach you a month prior 

to the meeting. 

Sincerely, 

S. KULLBACK 

Executive Secretary 

NSA Scientific Advisory Board 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 11-15-2013 pursuantto E.O. 1352e
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

** United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 2, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-41551

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus 

JOEL ERNESTO VALDES, also known as Julio Nestor,

Defendant-Appellant. 

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:06-CR-580-ALL

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Joel Ernesto

Valdes preserves for further review his contention that his

sentence is unreasonable because this court’s post-Booker**

rulings have effectively reinstated the mandatory Sentencing

Guideline regime condemned in Booker. Valdes concedes that his

argument is foreclosed by United States v. Mares, 402 F.3d 511

(5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 43 (2005), and its progeny,

which have outlined this court’s methodology for reviewing
No. 06-41551

-2-

sentences for reasonableness. Valdes also raises arguments that

are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S.

224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a

penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Table of Contents

Exhibit 13.2

Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A. 
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Sections 1350(a) and (b)), the undersigned hereby certifies as follows:

1. I am the Chief Financial Officer of Compañía Cervecerías Unidas S.A. (the Company).

2. The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 accompanying this Certification, in the form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and

3. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: June 22, 2009

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ Ricardo Reyes      
| |                        
| | Chief Financial Officer

---
REF ID:A72421 

,_EAIDtll rem SE DlUC'lCtl, JIATIOIAL htumt MJmCY 

IUB.TBC'J!r ~1aon ot ISA. Oivilirm Ora4e ltructure with Otticer 

ln4e IJ:mit.ation Act ~ 1951, 

1. A9 of 30 liq J.951;., EA ciTi.Uan graAea ca111MuH1ura.te Vitb 

Jdli'taz7 p-a4u nre • tollowai 

~ Civilian 

rne !2.· ! or 'J!o'bl 

CID Ott ... J.6, 17, 18 ' eoi cNt> •·15 ll9 1:~ Lt ~ Cdr) .... iz.. " 1.2 

MaJ 1.eclr) GS-13 ~(Lt) as ~ 7·r ... ia 15. 

let Lt ~Lt.jf) as-u. 10 ~ W"f ·1 

lal.Lt .. GS-9,, 8 8" 44.8 - - 'fOJ!AL lSlT 100.0 

t. Prm '1le ctticer Grade IJ.llitaticm Act c4 ~' a89iain6 a 

tota.l eall:l••ioned •tren.cth in 1a.ch hrv1ce ot S0,.0001 the a.uthorili$\ 

an;d)ers ot nnlor ottieerm traaelate into tbcff percenta.£.•sc 

= t=> ,:r ,:;' ,.;62 

Lt Col (C4r) J.3•9 lO., la.l ..., (Lo4r) 18.7 17.3 J.8.9 

J. hlectin& the .:>at favorable ~ the previous pe:C'Cem.taeea and 

~ln& tbs to the 1817 totB.l 1JI. ~h l, D.A. tap civilian gradea 

~ 1n t.'beae :mml>er111 

Jlo. 

- •-1!, 17, 18 la.n) 9.15 Col) •-1~ Lt Col) m-13 llaJ) 

- -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 09-10-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 
REF- IB--:-A1~2.._..4.-..2!""-1---

CO~FIDENTIAL 

.,_ 

- m-16.. i 7, 18 laen) Cll-l~ Col) f.11.1' Lt Co1) 

fll-13 JtaJ) 

# ,,..., 

CC>NFIDE:N I IAL 

• ea••ld-.IJ 

(~tual) 

' 15 

59 

132 

i 

I 

.. 

• I 

i 

. • 

- ~. _.,
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 36

 38

 40

 42

▲ ★

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

08/15

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 15 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL
Exhibit
31.1




SARBANES-OXLEY
SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION




I, Robert
O. Knutson, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Wind Energy America Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls
and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and




c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and




5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of
small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and




b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over
financial reporting.




/s/ Robert O.
Knutson




Robert O.
Knutson




Principal
Executive Officer and
Principal                          Dated:
May 20, 2009


Financial
Officer
... 

REK,.. .. TJ;>~= .. ~.€.?.~ 6 7 

Uil!~i'illtit I iAt 

3 

·cROSS REFERENCE SHEET 

MAIN SUBJECT: 

Propoaed Circular Letter 

To: Asat Exec tor ldm 

FromASA 

BRIEF SUMMARY: 

CLASSIFICATION NUMBER: 

Personnel- In'Y8st1gat1on ant Clea~anca tor crJ'Ptographic Dut1e• 

Date of Communication:l6 Kar• 1948 

Date of Basic Document:l6 llar • 1948 

lt is believed desirable that all Killtar7 Attabhea be inf"o:rmed 

-o• Dept. of the Army policy with regard to acceptance ot Dept. ot the Navy cert1t1cat1ona ot clearance tor c~yptograph1c duties, and pattial acceptance ot Dept. or State cert1r1cations ot 

clearance. It 1s therefore requested that 1ntormat1on substantially' 

aa follows be distributed in a circular letter to all KA: 

Classifier: Jira• Beyke 

Typist: Jlr s • Bm1 th 

CROSS REFERENCE NUMBERS: 

..,_ _ ........ _ 

I ] zcat. . btsl I J QA at tor .... ... ..a- - --

WDGAS Form No, 1493 7October1946 44052 

·. 

Routed to: 1'1lea 

Date of Classifying: 29 Kar• 1948 

_)eclassified and approved for release 

JY NSA on 04-15-2014 pursuant to 

::.o. 13526
,• 

I 

•' 

I 

I 

I 

I 

I 

Kr. John '!~ Wiutol"1ch 

8atur&l¥ :Rev.f.ev 

25 Weet la.5th Street •w Xork, Jlev York 

./': 

REF ID:A62916 

l3 April 1955 

~tr• WintFicha · · · ' ·- -

r I bope 70u rill recall IQ" husband Willia F • J'riedman 

~ tbe -.r 4'Y• "1ben you were a ~ ot the arouP ot 

ObA-cated Doak Collectora in Waahincton• Alt.bolJgh lie 1a 

t ~ ~ hi• ba.ck i.A the boapital recuperatiDg h'cD a bean 

k., ha ,... ext:rem~ interested in 701Jr m:iagrauaa.tic 

' le in the Sat~ ltevie'lf ot April 9. 

It would be inte:reatue to wa to know 1't 7ou beard 

E 11XJ¥ om abou-t. the dit:tieult)" ~ ymr problem.J ·rar 

crntaaraphic principle behind your mm;plea 1a eactq 

that ot eel"tain "proofs" ~ mm-Si.keepearean authort.mip1 wb1ch have been pu.t torth in alalst utronomieal 

i 

i~•· 

ltY bullband 88¥8 be viahea ;you 1184 not pri!Xted the 

arJll.Wera. What vou14 have happened 1n that cue intrigues hi.JIJ u4. replie• f'rcllll corre•pandents 'WOUld ba.ve -.de a .. tinte:nt•tillll a:hibit. 

81.ncere'.cy' )'Cfl.lra, 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-19-2014 pursuant to E.O. 1352e
No. 68500 

# FILED MAR 09 2016
TRACIE K. LrNDEMAN CLERK OF 'UPREME COURT BY .DEPUTY CLERK IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA ANDREW D. MILLER, THE SPECIAL ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF RICHARD K. MILLER; ANDREW D. MILLER, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND SUZETTE MILLER, AN INDIVIDUAL,

Appellants, vs. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORAITON; AND CLEAR RECON CORP. A NEVADA CORPORATION,

Respondent. ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and cause appearing, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.
CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT TRACE K. LINDEMAN

cc: Hon. Jerome M. Polaha, District Judge Madelyn Shipman, Settlement Judge Geoffrey Lynn Giles Ballard Spahr, LLP Aldridge Pite, LLP Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA CLERK'S ORDER 

### iG- 07519