alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Karger and others, Respondents, vs. Steele-Wedeles Company, imp., Appellant.

*April 26*

May *16, 1899.*

*Mortgages: Attachment: Priority: Recording act,*

*A*mortgage on real estate, executed and delivered in good faith, but not recorded until after the levy of a writ of attachment and *the*filing of the certificate with the register of deeds, takes precedence to such attachment lien. The recording act only protects a subsequent purchaser in good faith for a valuable consideration, who first records his conveyance, from the effect of a prior unrecorded conveyance, and does not extend to attaching creditors.

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Ashland county: John K. Paeish, Circuit Judge.

*Affirmed.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *Tomlcvns dh Merrill.*

To the point that the attachment lien was prior and superior to the mortgage lien, they cited secs. 2241, 2242, 2737, R. S. 1878; Drake, Attachment, § 239; *Shufeldt v. Pease,*16 Wis. 689; *Hibben v. Boyer, 38*Wis. 319; *Gutter v. James,*64 Wis. 173; *Prielcett v. Muele,*74 Wis. 199; *Bivrtv. M&rehcvnts Ins. Oo.*106 Mass. 356; *Wahrenberger v. Waid,*8 Colo. App. 200; *Southern B. da T. Oo. v. Folsom,*75 Eed. Rep. 929; *Oa/rter v. Ohampion,*8 Conn. 549; *Bigelow v.*Tojpliff, 25 Yt. 288; *Mcvyham v. Goornbs,*14 Ohio, 428; *Gross v. Fombey,*54 Ark. 179; *Bu,tler v. Bcmlc of Mazepgia,*94 Wis. 351.

Eor the respondents there was a brief by *Gleason d¡*Sleight, and oral argument by *Richard Sleight.*

*287Winslow, J.

This is an action of foreclosure of a real-estate mortgage, and the question presented is whether an attachment lien takes precedence of a prior mortgage upon the property, executed and delivered in good faith, but not recorded until after the levy of the attachment and filing of the certificate of attachment. The trial court held that the mortgage lien was prior to the attachment lien, and this-conclusion was undoubtedly correct. The rule is thus correctly stated in 1 Wade, Attachment, § 253: “The attachment only operates as a lien upon the interest in the premises-which the debtor has at the time of the levy. This is the general rule, and is only varied by statutes which give the-attaching creditor the same standing as subsequent purchasers without notice.” See, also, Drake, Attachment (7th ed.),. § 234

Our recording act only protects a “ subsequent purchaser in good faith and for a valuable consideration,” who first, records his conveyance, from the effect of a prior unrecorded conveyance, and does not extend to attaching creditors.. Stats. 1898, secs. 2241, 2242. The same principle has been applied to a mechanic’s lien in this state. *Mathwig v. Mann,*96 Wis. 213.

*By the*Oourt.— Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12470-12471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05390]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER15-1080-000]


Beethoven Wind, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding, 
of Beethoven Wind, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such application 
includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of 
future issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, 
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone 
filing a motion to

[[Page 12471]]

intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability is March 23, 2015.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f090a1d0c00212326212a1c3a3f3f203d3b0f292a3d2c61282039"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aee8ebfcede1c0c2c7c0cbfddbdedec1dcdaeec8cbdccd80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a> or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

    Dated: March 3, 2015.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-05390 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TlHR51~0461~ 

<to 3.3(h) (2) 

PL 86"--36/50 USC 3605 

Jbf Sl!iSR§ 

PRrOSED AG»!DA roR !J,S~u:u%F nt ~ TO DISCJ!Sf 

l • ....._1 ---

a. Evaluation of current/I l 

b. ;e;· ew of nres.en.· +,·<·a· naneements. c. I_ _ ./ ii t 

l Value of current material. 

(2) Requirements not yet satisfied. 

(3) Potential capabilities for meeting US/UIC requirements not 

yet satisfied. 

d. Assessment of/security practices and clearance procedures. 

e. Desirability/of extension: 

(1) Advantages. 

(2) Disadvantages. 

f. Recommend.ed policy and resultant course of action. 

2._1 ---

Same as paragraphs a. through f ., above. 

3 • I ..... __ ___. 

Same as paragraphs a. through £., above. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 05-13-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

T01°SECRET
~-, 

.__ 

-

~ 

~-

~· ......_. 

~­

j!:' 

=--- . ....: - .,.... 

---..._ -

----- -- ~-==--

-r --=-- - ~.1 

'" 

"-7 

~. ~ ~ I 0/9/:-.-·i--

d-r-J /oj 'l/5-2-

~j_. ~'\.'\,,...Q.. .).. • 

-~ JW law had w con\ltc\ wlth the ~- 'lfhtcn - bold 

at. ti. ksUtM !'el" !t:.iJIOt'lotl .11nalr.:ia th1a www:er Cl1 1tdeb wu 

ap;ft!i6idilJ7 t.n. u.d Vorca:s :3-oeuJ"!.f.7 Apnoy• T th1JS ;yo-.i 115.U ba 

l!'J~ated 

~ 

in knalt1ne ttw t 1 tioe d«Tidad to R'9rlf the •xr~ 

;,·~ lld to ha.Ta a si.S]ar ptbaring D8Xt IN:V'lOJ". YolU" opinion 

a w.pw:mts ~u be~ in M9la\1.f1G u. in d.et.emtn.t"z the dinO· 

tt.oa or •• next. :q11p&at.•. 

. _l WJ1,d_1!111Ch ·~·- hart»e 10r:tl mlhUPS 01" CUR ents on -u. ~"~ta ~ a det.trdta boar1~ on •JCb a ~nU111 

I

. .tro tbi Objecti. ftS 11Plire'1 tste? 

I Vas the Jftlfts:J Ulia ...-rill the r.l&b\ cllreot.1.an? . . v.mt kG1 peopl@ ar.lld t1e e1111f:h' to:r 1*ft ;rear": 

.- , Wbm eult1 JQ"1 ftQCDit&rid te '-~tor next. ,.e? 

a.\ fi:lr't.Mr o~tt-n~ do '70'-J. f1911D=-d 7 - -

1- WS 1!. ·u..i -,,,al'tu::ft.7 to ptA WW, ft.rat.-ha,n! kncr1ledJe 

C ._,, "ft1161ti.U~1~ uy.'lposila ~ it.a CCJIJ1\l.Ct. as not beetl poe91-

111.a for-jfj&l, bll'\ I ~ul.d 91'preciate 70--.:s.r :.t.a~s on t.beae qt.Wllt.ims~, 

•~•w IDM.n.ect or llmit.ed thq _,. b9,. c1.noe It.at. I vi.eh U"O ._ 

•?dons-~ed ,eopl.e W10 did not. diraotq ~o11l&te in t.m 

....,om-. . 

A oow ot 'till. OS1rn9 ~detrU.lil NpCi't, lt9!1 t."le rat.t»Sr wJJcy 

~ 

~-----.. eis, ts~ tar~ intormt1or.. tt 70-J. do not. mtlb to 

Vll- Np>"•~ • ....,~ 1t. In atdi\loc,. it 70;,,, would lib 

ti. ... a:r o:r .U of t.be llp!"tOJ'd1C93 to tbe Nport• ! 11111 tM g1M.l to 

..it iWl w 10!1 en request. 

: ·:t 1dl1 be ~ ~ to 7et1 roY t.tkt~ U.. Oft ih1Jt •ttsr. - - . ~ 

Ctplest~a 

' t&r<~i) 

_:~~~di2u~~*i1;.-~- -~t ~ ~ :~ift.t/~:l'" •-'•y 

.. 

~' .. -~, -

NSA on 06-12-2014 ursuantto E.O. 1352 
..l:ifl ......... , ... --- .. ' 

-

-...... 

~ 

:-

MEMO FOB. RECORD1 

PJ!"O.teaaor Oatrns, Ohie.t of 03 am Mr. J'rledman agreed it was usetul 

to have comments tl'Olll quali.f'led mathematicians on the symposium_. but not 

participants thereof". Comments would be usaM in guiding the next 

llYJll.po si m. 

}_. 

' . -"t';, ... 

r 

I 

= 

. 

.. 

. I 

' 

~ 

. 

-

-

• 

I 

= c 

f
Personal communication with Scott Everhart, May 2009.

SeptiTech, Sales Representative

SeptiTech manufactures and installs residential septic systems. SeptiTech also manufactures 

onsite wastewater treatment systems utilizing fixed film biological filters. These systems cost 

approximately $3,000 to $4,000 to install.
EXHIBIT 32(a)


                                CERTIFICATION OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                 SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending December 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), hereby certifies to the best
of the undersigned's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            (1) The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Date: February 10, 2005          By:      /s/  Robert A. Lerman
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                           Robert A. Lerman
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer

This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically
incorporates it by reference.
Exhibit 15.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We have issued our
reports dated March 25, 2015, with respect to the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of Trinity Biotech plc on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31,
2014. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in the following Registration Statements of Trinity Biotech plc:



|          |  |             |            |  |                |  |            | 
|--------- |  | ----------- | ---------- |  | -------------- |  | ---------- | 
|Form Type |  | File Number |            |  | Effective Date | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-7762   |  |                |  | 10/10/1997 | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-124384 |  |                |  | 4/28/2005  | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-166590 |  |                |  | 5/6/2010   | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-182279 |  |                |  | 6/22/2012  | 
|Form S-8  |  |             | 333-195232 |  |                |  | 4/11/2014  | 

/s/ GRANT THORNTON

Dublin, Ireland

March 25, 2015
# CE2004084EN.01091902.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/919 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/919

---

(2004/C 84 E/1016)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-0936/04

by Jens-Peter Bonde (EDD) to the Commission

(22 March 2004)

Subject:   EU Economic EU support for positive publicity

Subject:

Will the Commission give a complete list of all medias which have received economic subsidies from the EU Commission, and the journalists who have received subsidies from the Commission's information office?

The question is based on information from the article ‘Brussels pays for positive publicity’ on: (http://www.euobserver.com/index.phtml?aid=14700).

Answer given by Mr Prodi on behalf of the Commission

(30 April 2004)

(30 April 2004)

In May 2003, the Directorates-General for Enlargement, General Press and Communication and Secretariat General launched a call for proposals in the audiovisual sector, totalling EUR 16,5 million. It was intended for television and radio broadcasters and covered Enlargement, the Future of the EU and General Information on the EU.

The Honourable Member can find the results on the following sites:

| — | for ‘Enlargement’: (http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/communication/pdf/audiovisual_2003_result_fr.pdf) |
| --- | --- |

—

for ‘Enlargement’: (http://europa.eu.int/comm/enlargement/communication/pdf/audiovisual_2003_result_fr.pdf)

| — | for ‘Future of the EU’ and ‘General Information on the EU’: (http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/presscommunication/grants/grantsen.htm) |
| --- | --- |

—

for ‘Future of the EU’ and ‘General Information on the EU’: (http://europa.eu.int/comm/dgs/presscommunication/grants/grantsen.htm)

---
Exhibit 32.1





|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|Certification of CEO and CFO                 
|Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,          
|As Adopted Pursuant to                       
|Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002







In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties Fund XVI (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Martha L. Long, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of the Partnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financial officer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/Martha L. Long      
| | Name: Martha L. Long   
| | Date: August 13, 2008  
| |                        
| | /s/Stephen B. Waters   
| | Name: Stephen B. Waters
| | Date: August 13, 2008  





This certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
----- . . . ., - . - , REF ID :A68656 --:~: ;:v- .... 'WI ~ = 

~-a•- -_ -·-~JRF="ifX:N'TIAt -~-

Sec;ur!tyDivision 

A1'1'lh LTJQ Haag 

_ R~~ot tor Conterenc• Badce~ 

Consultant; · S March 19$2 

1. It is requested that oonterence badges be made available to the tollowing 

persons who are members of the Special Cryptologt.o Adnso17 Group (SCAG) tor the __ dates 12 mi l3 March 19$2. 

Dr. Stewart s. Caims 

Mr. Joseph Desch 

Mr. John H. HOlilal'd 

Hr. John ~~ >tcPhersQD. 

Dr, John von Neumann 

Dr. R. I. POtter 

Dr. H. P. Robertson 

Dr. Claude E. Shannon 

Dr. Charles B. Tompkina 

Mr. William Webstei2. Inasmuch as the conterenoe is to be held at Arlington Hall Station. it is 

requested t.'llat the bad.gee be made available to these peraona at .Arlington Hall 

Static:n by 1300 hours, 12 March 19$2. 

--

• 

MARY c. LANE 

Cap~WAC 

Ext. l 

------- -Declassified and approved for release by NSA on OB-16-2014 · pursuantto E .o. 13526- =-- · =
... --· <!! 

REF ID:A44586 

SECRET 

NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY 

FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 

Mr. T. Achilles Pol.yzoides 

Director, Special Projects Staff 

Department of State 

Washington 25, D. c. 

Dear Sir: 

Serial: N 

In the event it becomes difficult or impossible for the Natio~ Security Agency to continue operations at Fort Meade, 

5012 

these functions will be assumed by Headquarters, u. s. Air Force 

Security Service, at Kelly Air Force Base, San Antonio, Texas. 

Simultaneously with assumption of SIGINT responsibilities, HQS USAFSS 

will assume control of the Critical Communications System (CRITICOMM). . . 

'Emergency communications plans of the BQS USAFSS will include 

provision for SIGINT communications support of agencies and 

departments of the Government which move to relocation sites. · It 

is requested that you de8.l. directly with BQS USAFSS to complete 

arrangements for this support. 

NSA is malting no provision for direct communications with 

emergency relocation sites for two reasons. First, it is most 

unlikely that NSA can continue to operate under conditions which 

compel other departments and agencies to move; and second, in the 

unlikely event that NSA can continue to operate, coamunications 

with relocation sites can be effectively provided through HQS USA.Fas. 

Copy Furnished: 

COMUSAFSS 

AFSSOP 

Vice Admiral, USN 

Director 

T~~~ ~ ~~ ""S>\\:...__{C.\&\ ( N-so\~ ~c:..1 ~t..1.a-0) 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-25-2013 pursuantto E .0. 1352a 

SECRET 
... 

REF ID:A44586 

' 

- e SE€RET 

Serial: N 5012 

cc: nm~~-. . .. -. 

AG ' 

Reading File 

OPS 

PROD-04 

TCOM (5) 

M/R: NBA and Hq AFSS h~ve coord:lna ted their planning f'or emergency conmnmications. Hq AFSS is the alternate CRITICOMM CONTROL Center. Maintenance of' 

SIGINT ccmmru.nications with the emergency relocation sites of' the Departments 

and Agencies is included in this planning. BSA Ltr to COMUBAFSS1 SUbject: 

Communications Planning f'or the NBA Alternate Headquarters (U), dated 

14 October 1960 reflects the results of' this joint planning. It is now 

necessary to inf'orm the various Departments and Agencies of' this planning 

so they can ef'f'ectively coordinate their emergei:l.cy planning with Bq AFSS. 

This is one of' a series of' letters f'or that purpose. Coordinated with 

Col. Johnson, ~ ,":'4l;}_ ~s, PROD-o4. 

/tfHr::.~ DA. DSON1 A ~/TCOM1 33248,, 21 Dec 6o,, jvd 

SE€RET I
# FILED

July 23, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT NASHVILLE JULY 1998 SESSION

CARL LONDON, ) ) C.C.A. No. 01C01-9710- CR-00458 Appellant, ) ) Davidson County V. ) ) Honorable J. Ran dall Wyatt , Jr., Judge STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) (Post-Convicti on) Appellee. ) )

FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: Carl London, Pro Se John Knox Walkup TDOC # 122534 Attorney General & Reporter Lake County Regional Correctional Facili ty Elizabeth B. Marney Route 1, Box 330 Assistant Attorney Gener al Tiptonville, TN 38079 425 Fifth Avenue North Nashville, TN 37243-0493 Victor S. Johnson, III District Attorney General Lila Statom Dan Hamm Assistant District A

ttorneys General Washington Square, Suite 500 222 Second Avenue North Nashville, TN 37201-1649

OPINION FILED: ___________________

AFFIRMED-

-RULE 20 PAUL G. SUMM ERS, Judge

O P I N I O N-2- The appellant, Carl London, appeals the denial of post-convict ion relief. In January 1992, the appellant pled guilty to one count of aggravated rape and received a twenty

-three-year sentence i n the Tennessee Department of Correction. On January 17, 1997, the appellant filed a pro se petition for postconviction relief, and on F ebruary 5, 1997, the trial court dismissed the petiti on. The court held that the petition w as filed outside the statute of limi tations, and the appellant’s challenge to his sentence calculation was not a cognizable claim for post -convi ction r

elief.

The appellant’s primary issue for review then is whether the trial court properly denied his pe

tition for po

st-convi ction reli ef. We affirm.

The appellant contends that the post- conviction court err ed by dismissing his petition for post-conv iction relief. He arg ues that his guilty plea was involuntarily enter

ed, that his attorney prov ided ineffective assistance, a nd that the state breached its plea ag reement with him regar ding his sentence.

The state argues that the post- conviction court proper ly dismissed the appellant’s petition. The stat e contends that because the appellant ’s conviction became final in January 1992, his filing of a post-conviction petition on January 17, 1997, which was al most five years after his conviction, was t ime barred. Also, the state asserts that the appellant’s challenge to his sentence calculati on is not a cogniz able cl aim for p ost-con victi on reli ef.

We agree with the court’s determinat ion that the appellant’s petit ion was time barred and did not state a cognizable claim for relief. Theref ore, we affirm the denial of the petition pursuant to Rule 20 of the Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

_______________________-3- PAUL G. SUMMERS, Ju dge

CONCUR:

_____________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Jud ge

_____________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, Jud ge
CONFffiENl'lld; - tJ. 5. EYES OHL¥ 

SUBJECT NUMBER 

USCIB~ 9.3/34 

Subject: 

Item 5 of the Agenda for the ll3th Meeting of USCIB, 

held on 11 March 1955. 

USCIB Master Requirements List (USCIB 9.3/30). 

(Note by the Secretary: Due to the lateness or the hour the Acting Chairman 

(General Cabell) suggested that consideration or this item be held over 

until a subsequent meeting. It was so agreed.) 

USCIB: 9 .3/34 - 19 -

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-01-2014 pursuant to E. 0. 1352B
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 23

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

     We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-04524, 33-74026 and 33-89146) and in the
Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No.
333-21557) of Data Broadcasting Corporation of our report dated February 7,
2001, relating to the financial statements which appear in this Form 10-K. We
also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report on the financial
statement schedule, which also appears in this form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
February 7, 2001
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.3

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

The Board of Directors
Lycos, Inc.:

  We consent to the use of our report incorporated herein by reference and to
the references to our firm under the headings "Experts" and "Selected
Historical Financial Data" in the proxy statement/prospectus.

                                          /s/ KPMG LLP

Boston, Massachusetts

May 27, 1999