12522 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Notices 

Wildlife, and a team of stakeholders, 

which included scientific experts, 

landowners and managers, agency 

representatives, and non-government 

organizations. 

Section 4(f) of the Act requires us to 

provide an opportunity for public 

review and comment prior to 

finalization of recovery plans. We made 

the draft of this recovery plan available 

for public comment from September 14, 

2012, to November 13, 2012 (77 FR 

56858). We considered all information 

we received during the public comment 

period and revised the recovery plan 

accordingly. 

Recovery Plan Goals 

The purpose of a recovery plan is to 

provide a framework for the recovery of 

species so that protection under the Act 

is no longer necessary. A recovery plan 

includes scientific information about 

the species and provides criteria that 

enable us to gauge whether downlisting 

or delisting the species is warranted. 

Furthermore, recovery plans help guide 

our recovery efforts by describing 

actions we consider necessary for each 

species’ conservation and by estimating 

time and costs for implementing needed 

recovery measures. 

To achieve these goals, we have 

identified the following objectives in the 

recovery plan: 

(1) Each federally listed subspecies of 

island fox exhibits demographic 

characteristics consistent with long-term 

viability; and 

(2) Land managers are able to respond 

in a timely fashion to predation by 

nesting golden eagles or significant 

predation rates by transient golden 

eagles, to potential or incipient disease 

outbreaks and to other identified threats 

using the best available technology. 

Because some or all of the subspecies 

may meet their recovery criteria, we are 

initiating a status review of each 

subspecies. 

Why do we conduct a status review? 

Under the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), 

we maintain Lists of Endangered and 

Threatened Wildlife and Plants (which 

we collectively refer to as the List) in 

the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at 

50 CFR 17.11 (for animals) and 17.12 

(for plants). Section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act 

requires us to review each listed 

species’ status at least once every 5 

years. Our regulations at 50 CFR 424.21 

require that we publish a notice in the 

Federal Register announcing those 

species under active review. For 

additional information about status 

reviews, go to http://www.fws.gov/

endangered/what-we-do/recoveryoverview.html, scroll down to ‘‘Learn 

More about 5-Year Reviews,’’ and click 

on our factsheet. 

What information do we consider in 

our review? 

A status review considers all new 

information available at the time of the 

review. In conducting these reviews, we 

consider the best scientific and 

commercial data that have become 

available since the listing determination 

or most recent status review, such as: 

(A) Species biology, including but not 

limited to population trends, 

distribution, abundance, demographics, 

and genetics; 

(B) Habitat conditions, including but 

not limited to amount, distribution, and 

suitability; 

(C) Conservation measures that have 

been implemented that benefit the 

species; 

(D) Threat status and trends in 

relation to the five listing factors (as 

defined in section 4(a)(1) of the Act); 

and 

(E) Other new information, data, or 

corrections, including but not limited to 

taxonomic or nomenclatural changes, 

identification of erroneous information 

contained in the List, and improved 

analytical methods. 

Any new information will be 

considered during the review and will 

also be useful in evaluating the ongoing 

recovery programs for the species. 

Request for Information 

To ensure that a status review is 

complete and based on the best 

available scientific and commercial 

information, we request new 

information from all sources. See ‘‘What 

Information Do We Consider in Our 

Review?’’ for specific criteria. If you 

submit information, please support it 

with documentation such as maps, 

bibliographic references, methods used 

to gather and analyze the data, and/or 

copies of any pertinent publications, 

reports, or letters by knowledgeable 

sources. 

Public Availability of Submissions 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment—including your 

personal identifying information—may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

Comments and materials received will 

be available for public inspection, by 

appointment, during normal business 

hours at the offices where the comments 

are submitted. 

Authority 

We developed our recovery plan and 

initiate these reviews under the 

authority of the Endangered Species Act 

of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et 

seq.). 

Dated: February 27, 2015. 

Alexandra Pitts, 

Regional Director, Pacific Southwest Region. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05029 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4310–55P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–909] 

Certain Non-Volatile Memory Devices 

and Products Containing Same; 

Commission Determination Not To 

Review Granting Motion Terminating 

the Investigation as to all 

Respondents; Termination of the 

Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 23) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

terminating the above-captioned 

investigation as to all respondents based 

on a settlement agreement. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http://

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES

Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 45 / Monday, March 9, 2015 / Notices 12523 

on February 3, 2014, based on a 

complaint filed on behalf of Macronix 

International Co., Ltd. of Hsin-chu, 

Taiwan and Macronix America, Inc. of 

Milpitas, California. 79 FR 6227–28. The 

complaint, as amended, alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain non-volatile 

memory devices and products 

containing the same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 6,552,360; 6,100,557; and 

6,002,630. The complaint further alleges 

a domestic industry exists or is in the 

process of being established. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation, as 

amended, named the following 

respondents: Spansion, Inc., Spansion 

LLC, and Ruckus Wireless, Inc., all of 

Sunnyvale, California; Spansion 

(Thailand) Ltd. of Nonthaburi, Thailand; 

Tellabs Operations, Inc. and Tellabs 

North America, Inc., both of Naperville, 

Illinois (collectively, ‘‘the Tellabs 

respondents’’); Beats Electronics LLC of 

Santa Monica, California; Delphi 

Automotive PLC of Kent, United 

Kingdom; Delphi Automotive Systems, 

LLC of Troy, Michigan; Harman 

International Industries, Inc. of 

Stamford, Connecticut; Harman Becker 

Automotive Systems, Inc. of Farmington 

Hills, Michigan; and Harman Becker 

Automotive Systems GmbH of Karlsbad, 

Germany. The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations participated in the 

investigation. 

On September 4, 2014, the 

Commission issued notice of its 

determination not to review the ALJ’s ID 

(Order No. 15) terminating the 

investigation as to original respondent 

Tellabs, Inc. of Naperville, Illinois, and 

amending the complaint and notice of 

investigation to substitute the Tellabs 

respondents for Tellabs, Inc. 

On January 29, 2015, complainants 

and all respondents jointly moved to 

terminate the investigation with respect 

to all respondents based on a settlement 

agreement. The Commission 

investigative attorney filed a response 

supporting the motion. 

On January 30, 2015, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 23) granting 

the joint motion for termination of the 

investigation as to all respondents. He 

found that the motion satisfies 

Commission rules 210.21(a)(2), (b)(1). 

No party petitioned for review of the ID. 

The Commission has determined not 

to review the subject ID, and has 

terminated the investigation. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 

210. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: March 4, 2015. 

Lisa R. Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05424 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Prisons 

Annual Determination of Average Cost 

of Incarceration 

AGENCY: Bureau of Prisons, Justice. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The fee to cover the average 

cost of incarceration for Federal inmates 

in Fiscal Year 2014 was $30,619.85 

($83.89 per day). (Please note: There 

were 365 days in FY 2014.) The average 

annual cost to confine an inmate in a 

Residential Re-entry Center for Fiscal 

Year 2014 was $28,999.25 ($79.45 per 

day). 

DATES: Effective Date: March 10, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: Office of General Counsel, 

Federal Bureau of Prisons, 320 First St. 

NW., Washington, DC 20534. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Sarah Qureshi, (202) 307–2105. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 28 CFR 

part 505 allows for assessment and 

collection of a fee to cover the average 

cost of incarceration for Federal 

inmates. We calculate this fee by 

dividing the number representing 

Bureau of Prisons facilities’ monetary 

obligation (excluding activation costs) 

by the number of inmate-days incurred 

for the preceding fiscal year, and then 

by multiplying the quotient by 365. 

Under § 505.2, the Director of the 

Bureau of Prisons determined that, 

based upon fiscal year 2014 data, the fee 

to cover the average cost of 

incarceration for Federal inmates in 

Fiscal Year 2014 was $30,619.85 ($83.89 

per day). (Please note: There were 365 

days in FY 2014.) The average annual 

cost to confine an inmate in a 

Residential Re-entry Center for Fiscal 

Year 2014 was $28,999.25 ($79.45 per 

day). 

Charles E. Samuels, Jr., 

Director, Bureau of Prisons. 

[FR Doc. 2015–05437 Filed 3–6–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–05–P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Office of the Secretary 

Bureau of International Labor Affairs 

National Advisory Committee for Labor 

Provisions of U.S. Free Trade 

Agreements 

AGENCY: Bureau of International Labor 

Affairs, Department of Labor. 

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (FACA), as 

amended (5 U.S.C. App. 2), the North 

American Agreement on Labor 

Cooperation (NAALC), and the Labor 

Chapters of U.S. Free Trade Agreements 

(FTAs), the Secretary of Labor has 

determined that the renewal of the 

charter of the National Advisory 

Committee for Labor Provisions of U.S. 

Free Trade Agreements (NAC) is 

necessary and in the public interest and 

will provide information that cannot be 

obtained from other sources. The 

committee shall provide its views to the 

Secretary of Labor through the Bureau of 

International Labor Affairs of the U.S. 

Department of Labor, which is the point 

of contact for the NAALC and the Labor 

Chapters of U.S. FTAs. The committee 

shall comprise twelve members, four 

representing the labor community, four 

representing the business community, 

and four representing the public. 

Purpose: In accordance with the 

provisions of the FACA, Article 17 of 

the NAALC, Article 17.4 of the United 

States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement, 

Article 18.4 of the United States-Chile 

Free Trade Agreement, Article 18.4 of 

the United States-Australia Free Trade 

Agreement, Article 16.4 of the United 

States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement, 

Article 16.4 of the Central AmericaDominican Republic-United States Free 

Trade Agreement (CAFTA–DR), Article 

15.4 of the United States-Bahrain Free 

Trade Agreement, Article 16.4 of the 

United States-Oman Free Trade 

Agreement, Article 17.5 of the United 

States-Peru Trade Promotion 

Agreement, Article 17.5 of the United 

States-Colombia Trade Promotion 

Agreement, Article 19.5 of the United 

States-Korea Free Trade Agreement, and 

Article 16.5 of the United States-Panama 

Trade Promotion Agreement, the 

Secretary of Labor has determined that 

the renewal of the charter of the NAC is 

necessary and in the public interest and 

will provide information that cannot be 

obtained from other sources. 

The Bureau of International Labor 

Affairs of the U.S. Department of Labor 

serves as the U.S. point of contact under 

the FTAs listed above. The committee 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES