alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 

Barry R. Stephens, P.E. Director 

Division of Air Pollution Control 

Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation 

9th Floor, L & C Annex 

401 Church Street 

Nashville, Tennessee 38243-1 53 1 

Dear Mr. Stephens: 

We are enclosing the final performance evaluation report as a result of the end-of- year 

review of your section 105 commitments in your FY 2010 Air Planning Agreement and as 

required under the joint evaluation process under 40 CFR 35.1 15. This report outlines the 

State's various grant commitments and their status. Upon completion of the review, we find 

that the State has satisfactorily met all commitments except one as noted below: 

Cross Cuttine Issues, Commitment No. 4 on Quality Assurance Proiect Plans 

(OAPP): The State or local agency must detail, every three years, the requirements for 

compliance with EPA standards on the handling of data collected for reporting to the 

EIS Gateway for the National Emission Inventory. The document is called the Quality 

Assurance Project Plan: National Emissions Inventory (NEI), otherwise hown as the 

NEI QAPP. It describes how the agency collects emission data along with details of the 

corresponding criteria for ensuring data quality. Detailed QAPPs for environmental 

data operations performed by or for the EPA are required by EPA Order 5360.1, 

Policy and Program Requirements to Implement the Mandatory Quality Assurance 

Program. By October 9, 2009, applicable agencies provide a status update and target 

submittal date. 

We understand that the State is currently working on the NEI QAPP. As a reminder, a 

programmatic term and condition on your FY 201 0-1 1 section 105 grant award required the 

submittal of this document by December 3 1,201 0. We strongly encourage the State to submit 

this to EPA as soon as possible to comply with grant requirements and to avoid delays in 

receiving future awards. If you have any questions regarding the NEI QAPP commitment, 

please contact Brenda Johnson of the EPA Region 4 staff at (404) 562-9037. 

We appreciate the progress you made in FY 201 0 and look forward to continuing our 

joint efforts to protect and improve air quality in the southeast. 

Internet Address (URL) http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable Pnnled with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recyded Paper (Minimum 30% Poslconsumer) 
If you have any questions regarding your grant, please contact Stuart Perry (404) 562- 

8980 or Gwendolyn Graf at (404) 562-9289 Jx+4 

ouglas Neeley C) Chief 

Air Toxics and Monitoring Branch 

Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division
99-1305.

#### State v. Koniski.

Jefferson App. No. 90J1. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2016 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 2016

  To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to promote the 
                   responsible transfer of firearms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 9, 2015

   Mr. Kaine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend chapter 44 of title 18, United States Code, to promote the 
                   responsible transfer of firearms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Responsible Transfer of Firearms 
Act''.

SEC. 2. UNIVERSAL BACKGROUND CHECKS.

    Section 922(d) of title 18, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking ``It 
        shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose 
        of any firearm or ammunition to any person knowing or having 
        reasonable cause to believe that such person'' and inserting 
        ``Unless the transferor has taken reasonable steps to determine 
        that the recipient is not legally barred from possessing 
        firearms or ammunition under paragraphs (1) through (9), it 
        shall be unlawful for any person to sell or otherwise dispose 
        of any firearm or ammunition to a person who'';
            (2) in paragraph (5), by striking ``who,'';
            (3) in paragraph (6), by striking ``who''; and
            (4) in paragraph (7), by striking ``who,''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 5.1

                            Opinion of Ropes & Gray

                                                                 August 17, 1999
Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC  20549

  Re:  NSTAR Registration on Form S-8

Ladies and Gentlemen:

  We have acted as counsel to NSTAR (the "Registrant"), a Massachusetts business
trust, in connection with the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8.
The Registration Statement is to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and relates to the registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, of 525,000 Common Shares, par value $1.00 per share (the "Shares"), in
connection with the Employee Savings Plan of Commonwealth Energy System and
Subsidiary Companies (collectively, the "Plan").

  We are familiar with the Registration Statement and the Plan, and we have
examined the Registrant's Declaration of Trust, dated April 20, 1999, and the
Registrant's By-Laws.  We have also examined such other documents, instruments,
certificates and corporate records as we considered necessary for purposes of
this opinion, and have assumed that the signatures on all documents examined by
us are genuine.

  Based on the foregoing, we are of the opinion that the Shares, when issued in
accordance with the Plan and the consideration therefore received by the
Registrant will be authorized, validly issued, fully paid and nonassessable.

  We hereby consent to the filing of this opinion as Exhibit 5.1 to the
Registration Statement.

                                            Very truly yours,

                                            /s/ Ropes & Gray

                                            Ropes & Gray
# CE2004084EN.01071001.xml

| 3.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 84/710 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 84/710

---

(2004/C 84 E/0797)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0797/04

by Ria Oomen-Ruijten (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(11 March 2004)

Subject:   Student grants and free movement of persons

Subject:

From the age of 18, Netherlands students still attending an institution of pre-university or senior secondary vocational education in the Netherlands are no longer eligible for a child allowance and in its place receive a grant under the Student Grants Act. If such 18 year olds receive their education across the border, they get no funding. Is the Commission prepared, bearing in mind that this question is now being posed for the third time, to give a clear answer concerning the key issue. Does the Commission agree that this poses obstacles which impede the free movement of students?

Supplementary joint answer

to Written Questions E-3868/02 and E-0797/04

given by Mrs Reding on behalf of the Commission

(26 April 2004)

(26 April 2004)

The Honourable Member raises the question of the territorial aspect of national grants and other financial aids awarded to students, an issue that was also the subject of written questions E-3868/02 and E-3584/03 (1).

1

Member States can provide in their legislation for financial assistance for students, in accordance with criteria that vary from one Member State to another. Under certain countries' legislation, a grant can be transferred if a student decides to study in another Member State, allowing students to continue to enjoy the financial assistance awarded by their country of origin while they study in another Member State. However, Dutch law does not allow this.

The Commission shares the Honourable Member's view that limiting financial assistance to those students studying within the territory of the Member State concerned may constitute an obstacle to the free movement of students. Furthermore, the Commission Green Paper ‘Education, training, research: the obstacles to transnational mobility’ (2) mentions that the territorial nature of national grants may constitute a significant obstacle to mobility.

2

However, according to the information brought to the Commission's attention, the provisions in force in the Netherlands are not incompatible with the principles of free movement, and no breach of Community law has been identified. Students from the Netherlands have the right to go to other European countries to study, and exercise this right, and foreign students from other Member States are entitled to study in the Netherlands.

---

(1)  The answer to question 3584/03 also applies as a supplementary answer to question 3868/02.

1

(2)  COM(96) 462 final.

2

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD04-4-002]

# DATES:

 Applications are requested by July 1, 2015 in order to prepare for an expected increase in ILP work load over the next several years. However, the application period will remain open indefinitely to maintain a current listing of potential applicants.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Applications must be filed electronically via the Internet. See the instructions on the Commission's Web site (                        *http://www.ferc.gov*) under the “e-Filing” link. Applications should reference “DOCKET No. AD04-4-002, NOTICE REQUESTING APPLICATIONS FOR PANEL MEMBER LIST FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSING STUDY DISPUTE RESOLUTION”.                    

*Other Information:*                         Complete individual contact information must be provided.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        David Turner, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,  Office of Energy Projects, 888 First Street NE ., Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-6091,                         *David.Turner@ferc.gov*.                    

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             See § 5.14 of the final rule, which may be viewed on the Commission's Web site at                         *http://www.access.gpo.gov/​nara/​cfr/​waisidx_​06/​18cfr5_​06.html*.                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             These persons must not be otherwise involved with the proceeding.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             See § 5.9 of the final rule.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2015-05389 Filed 3-11-15; 8:45 am]

 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Amendment No.2 to Acuity Brands, Inc Nonemployee Director Deferred Compensation




 Exhibit 10(iii)A(86) 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 TO 
 ACUITY
BRANDS, INC. 
 NONEMPLOYEE DIRECTOR DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 
 (As Amended And Restated Effective As Of June 29, 2006) 
 THIS AMENDMENT made as of this 24th day of October, 2008, by ACUITY BRANDS,
INC. (the “Company”); 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, the Company established the Acuity Brands, Inc. Nonemployee Director Deferred Compensation Plan, which Plan was amended and restated generally effective
as of June 29, 2006 (the “Plan”), subject to the transition rules of Section 409A; 
 WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the
Plan in the manner hereinafter provided; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, as follows: 
 1. 
 Section 8 is hereby amended by deleting the present
section in its entirety and substituting the following in lieu thereof: 
 “8. Amendment; Termination. The Company (or its designee) shall
have the right in its sole discretion to amend this Plan in any manner at any time; provided, however, that no such amendment shall reduce the Eligible Director’s vested interest in his Account at that time. Any amendment shall be in writing
and executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company. All Eligible Directors shall be bound by such amendment. 
 The Company expects to continue
this Plan, but does not obligate itself to do so. The Company reserves the right to discontinue and terminate the Plan at any time, in whole or in part, for any reason (including a change, or an impending change, in the tax laws of the United States
or any State). If the Plan is terminated, the Committee shall be notified of such action in a writing executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company, and the Plan shall be terminated at the time therein set forth. Upon such termination,
(i) the Eligible Director’s Pre-Section 409A Account shall be paid in a manner determined by the Committee, and (ii) the Eligible Director’s Section 409A Account shall be paid in a lump sum, provided that (A) the
Company terminates at the same time any other arrangement that would be aggregated with the Plan under Section 409A; (B) the Company does not adopt any other arrangement that would be aggregated with the Plan under Section 409A for
three years; (C) the payment upon such termination shall not commence until 12 months after the date of termination and all such payments are completed within 24 months after the date of termination; and (D) such other requirements as may
be imposed by Section 409A are satisfied. The termination of this Plan shall not result in the 









 
reduction of the amount credited to the Eligible Director’s Account as of the date of such termination.” 
 2. 
 This Amendment No. 2 shall be effective as of
October 24, 2008. Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this
Amendment No. 2 as of the date first written above. 
  
  

			
	ACUITY BRANDS, INC.
		
	By:	 	/S/  VERNON J. NAGEL
		 	 Vernon J. Nagel
 Chairman, President, and
 Chief Executive Officer



  

 2
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1444

In re: MAECHEL SHAWN PATTERSON , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 5: 12

- hc

- 02063

- D )

Submitted : September 30, 2020 Decided: October 16, 2020

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion

.

Maechel Shawn Patterson , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Maechel S. Patterson petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order from this court directing the district court to vacate its 2018 order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the court’s 2012 order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. Patterson also seeks an order directing the district court to liberally construe the § 2254 petition as an emergency motion to reduce his sentence to time served and to order his custodian to release him from prison due to the COVID

- 19 pandemic . We conclude that Patterson is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4 th Cir. 2018) . Further, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795. Mandamus may not be used as a substitute for appeal. In re Lockheed Martin Corp. , 503 F.3d 351, 353 (4t h Cir. 2007). This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cnty. , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969) (per curiam), and does not have jurisdiction to review final state court

o rders, D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). The relief sought by Patterson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten tions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Exhibit 32.2
                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                          AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
               SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of J Net Enterprises, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Mark E. Wilson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  February 17, 2004        By:  /s/ Mark E. Wilson
                                      _______________________
                                      Mark E. Wilson
                                      Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          33,637
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               127,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    619,262
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          94,342
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            94,390
<LOANS>                                        673,084
<ALLOWANCE>                                     15,848
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,571,537
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,352,172
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             26,233
<LONG-TERM>                                     38,777
<COMMON>                                        55,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,608
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,571,537
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 16,570
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               13,110
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     6
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                29,686
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              12,843
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 874
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,969
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,304
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 10,438
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,631
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,631
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.47
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.46
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.39
<LOANS-NON>                                     13,309
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,745
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                19,281
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                16,776
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,099
<RECOVERIES>                                       171
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               15,848
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            15,848
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>