alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     EXHIBIT 5.1

              Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
                             One Financial Center
                          Boston, Massachusetts 02111


Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.                                Telephone: 617/542-6000
Washington, D.C. 20004                                   Fax: 617/542-2241
phone: 202/434-7300                                      www.mintz.com
       202/434-7400

                                   April 30, 1999

Ladies and Gentlemen:

You have requested our opinion with respect to certain matters in connection
with the filing by Number Nine Visual Technology Corporation (the "Company") of
a Registration Statement on Form S-3 on or about April 30, 1999 (the
"Registration Statement") with the Securities and Exchange Commission covering
the offering of Four Million Two Hundred Fifty Eight Thousand One Hundred 
Thirty-Seven (4,258,137) shares of the Company's Common Stock, $.01 par value 
(the "Shares").

In connection with this opinion, we have examined the Registration Statement and
such other documents, records, certificates, memoranda and other instruments as
we deem necessary as a basis for this opinion.  We have assumed the genuineness
and authenticity of all documents submitted to us as originals, and conformity
to originals of all documents submitted to us as copies thereof, and the due
execution and delivery of all documents where due execution and delivery are a
prerequisite to the effectiveness thereof.

On the basis of the foregoing, and in reliance thereon, we are the opinion that
the Shares, when sold in accordance with the Registration Statement will be
validly issued, fully paid, and nonassessable.

We consent to the filing of this opinion as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement.

                                         Very truly yours,


                                        /s/ Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris,
                                            Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. 
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,
                                        GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.
SECRET 

REF ID:A652. 

- USCIB: 13.2/59 llkNBI:iEl Vli 00M:EN'f 0llkNNB±B ONLY 

3 May 1955 

MEMORANDUM. FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Clearance for Category III COMINT (FIELDS). 

Reference: USCIB 13.2/58 of 25 April 1955. 

1. No objection having been received to the reference, the proposal 

contained in the enclosure therewith is considered approved. 

2. The CIA member has been in1formally notified of this decision, and 

authorized to proceed as indicated in paragraph 2 of the enclosure with 

the reference. 

Captain, • Navy 

utive Secretary, USCIB 

USCIB: 13.2/59 II:A:NB~ VIA OOM:EN'f Oll:A:NHElLS ONLY 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

SECRE'f 

24 
.t 

USCIB: 13. 2/58 HAfit>LE VIA e<MIN'f ffilkNNEfB ONt.¥ 

25 April 1955 

MEMORANDUM FOR THE MEMBERS OF USCIB: 

Subject: Clearance for Category III CCJ4:INT (FIEIDS). 

l. The enclosed request for confirmation of the "need-to-know" of 

Brigadier General Kenneth E. Fields is forwarded for consideration. 

2. Since the Board agreed that Major General K. D. Nichols, 

General Fields' predecessor, had a 11need-to-know11 during his tenure as 

General Manager of the Atomic Energy Commission (see USCIB 13.2/10) the 

"need-to-know" of General Fields is being proposed on a no objection 

basis. 

,3. Accordingly, if there is no objection raised by any member by 

1200, Monday, 2 May 1955, the enclosed proposal will be considered 

approved. 

Enclosure 

CIA Memo dtd 22 Apr 1955 

USCIB: 1.3. 2/58 

SECRET
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TVI Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George J. Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Dated: August 7, 2006 |  | /s/ George J. Roberts                            
|                      |  | George J. Roberts                                
|                      |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



-25-
cc: 

REF ID:A44413 

Serial: N 051L~ 

9 FE0 196'1 

COMSEC LIAISOlf OFFICER, mu!fISH EMBASS!' 

SUBJ.EC'l': IJ:SA/?JSA R&l> Discussions (U) 

REF.lmERCES: (a) IfSA letter, tile CSE&-169, SUbJect: Snnrnary 

or NSA/u!SA Discussions, <lated l J~ 1960 

(b) Memomndum, :file V17/F252, SubJect as above, 

dated 24 Janva:ey' l$6l. 

l. It is a. p.l.easure for me to ecm:t1rm ~ Director's 

proposals for the Engineers r meeting planned at the I£SA/NSA 

cU.scussions held 1n May J.960. 

2. Arrangements will be ma.de for approximate:cy :four of 

your representatives to visit RCA, Camden, ?f. J., am the Philco 

Corporati.Qn, pb1Jadelphia1 Pa. Dates :f'or this visit'vill be 

.sel.ected when a meeting can be arranged with you to discuss the 

fiDa.l ~a. 

3. AB you suggest, certa:f.n amendments to the agenda may 

be in order; accord1ngly, we concur in the direct di.scusaions 

you recommend. P1ease contact Mr. David Wolf'a.nd, &rED-Q21 

te1ephone PAr.kway 5-44oo, extension 78ftf, at 7our earliest 

conveJ:d.ence to arrange tar tbese d1.sc:ussions. 

4.. We l.ook forward to this visit which I am sure will be 

beneficjal to the UK/US COMSEC research and development ettort. 

D~~c~ , 

L. H. FROST 

Vice Admiral, USN 

Director AG 

Reading File 

R/D Reading File 

CSEC-o4 

B/D-02 

S'l'ED-02 

M/R: As a resul.t of the J.£SA/NSA discualdons he1d in May 1960, it 

was recommenQed that an NSA./Ii:SA Engineers 1 meeting be held at NSA. 

The UK COMSBC Liaison Off'ieer in a memorandum <lated 24 Jan 6J. sent 

to NSA a list of UK representatives and a proposed agellda. This 

letter--concurs in the visit and suggests an early meeting with the 

UK COMSBC Liaison Off'icer to firm. up the agenda and the representatives who will make the visits to RCA and Philco. CoordiDated with 

Miss K. Ross. CSEC-o4. 

Maj.David F. !hwaites, USAF/f!BD-02/5n4/pmi/7 Feb 61 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2003-1427, 2008-1378, -1400

ALEXANDER S. ORENSHTEYN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

and

DAVID FINK, TIMOTHY W. JOHNSON,

And FINK & JOHNSON,

Sanctioned Parties-Appellants,

v.

CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of

Florida in case no. 02-CV-60478, Judge Adalberto Jordan.

ON MOTION

Before MOORE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

We construe Alexander Orenshteyn's February 25, 2009 letter as a motion to

direct Citrix Systems, Inc. to file a corrected brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion is denied.
FOR THE COURT

MAR 2 0 2009

Date

cc:	Alexander S. Orenshteyn

Douglas J. Kline, Esq.

David Fink, Esq.

s19

/s/ Jan Horbalv

Jan Horbaly

FILED Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT

MAR 2 0 2009

itth

CixtK

2003-1427, 2008-1378, -1400	2
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theAnnual Report of Cornell Companies, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/Afor the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), IJames E. Hyman, Chief Executive Officer, President and the Chairmanof the Board, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.               The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.               The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ James E. Hyman                        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   | James E. Hyman, Chief  Executive Officer, |
|   | President and Chairman  of the Board      |
|   | March 5, 2010                        |

 

Note:     The certification the registrant furnishes in this exhibit is not deemed “filed”for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section. RegistrationStatements or other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionshall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expresslystated in such filing.

 

----
EXHIBIT 32(a)








CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Thermodynetics, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The Report complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in all material respects; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 12, 2010                                           By:          /s/  Robert A. Lerman


Robert A. Lerman


President and Chief Executive Officer





This certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.  This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent that the small business issuer specifically incorporates it by reference.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1306

MARIE M. MCMAHON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN P. ADAMS, Assistant Prosecutor, Morgan

County; DAVID H. SAVASTEN, Prosecutor, Morgan

County; DONALD C. HOTT, Honorable, retired

Senior Circuit Judge; JOHN M. HAMILTON,

retired Circuit Judge; GLEN STOTLER, County

Commissioner, Morgan County; CHARLES S. TRUMP,

IV, Attorney, State Delegate; MARGARET GORDON,

Attorney; SUSAN WEBSTER-MOSS, Town of Bath,

Mayor-defacto; DONALD SHARP, Senior Magistrate; MORGAN COUNTY FIRE BOARD, Sheriff's

Office; HOWARD TRITTIPOE, Secretary/Treasurer;

MARTIN & SEIBERT, L.C.; DANIEL T. BOOTH, Attorney; SUSAN SNOWDEN, Attorney; PAUL WEISS;

RAYMOND SHAPIRO, Doctor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. W. Craig Broadwater,

District Judge. (CA-97-143-3)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.
2

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marie M. McMahon, Appellant Pro Se. Lucien Garlow Lewin, STEPTOE &

JOHNSON, Martinsburg, West Virginia; Paul Benedict Weiss, MARTIN &

SEIBERT, L.C., Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing er

civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted and denying her motion for reconsideration. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. McMahon v. Adams, No. CA-97-143-3 (N.D.W. Va. Jan.

8 & Feb. 6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE COMPANY'S
DECEMBER 31, 1998 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN ITS FORM
10-K, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY OF REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,096
<SECURITIES>                                    17,335
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,431
<ALLOWANCES>                                       608
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                43,759
<PP&E>                                           7,077
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,517
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  48,951
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,855
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            89
<OTHER-SE>                                      35,124
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    48,951
<SALES>                                         26,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,848
<CGS>                                            2,972
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                36,033
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,755)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       140
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,895)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,895)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.34)<F1>
<FN>
<F1>The extracted information above identified as "EPS-PRIMARY" and
"EPS-DILUTED" represents basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) and diluted
EPS, respectively, calculated in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings Per Share".
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 23.3

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Form
S-8 No. File Nos. 333-54042, 333-45732, 333-39860, 333-36640, 333-36618,
33-50860, 33-50862, 33-50864, 33-57734, 33-78804, 33-92312, 33-95288, 333-22631,
333-26857, 333-28745, 333-28675, 333-40671, 333-46259, 333-78553, 333-78551,
333-60764, 333-53705, 333-87984 and 333-53707) pertaining to various stock
option plans of ePresence, Inc. of our report dated August 30, 2002, with
respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of ePresence, Inc.
in this Annual Report (Form 10-K/A) for year ended December 31, 2001.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
September 18, 2002
Boston, Massachusetts
REF ID:A60884 

... ~- • e s-t-3482 

SECURITY DPORMATIOl.1 

PROM: 

uscm COORJ>IIfA'l'OR 

z 

ACTION: SUSLO, LONDON SECRET· 

PASS J'OR ACTION TO smRE'l'ARY CYPHER POLICY BaARD FROM DIRAFSA X UCS 38 X 

YOUR CYB 20 XABLE X DISCUSSION OR DATA TRANSMISSIOD' SECURITY EQUIPMmTS IS 

I1l'mffDED TO BE MERELY EIPLO.RATORY CMA. COVERIBG GEmERAt. CONCEPTS OF DA.TA 'l'!WfSllIIJSI01' EllCRll"fiOll X ~Aim RO llA.!m. RllSllISSlOll m9- AS SOC11 llllDER CllRBBll'R 

I' 

DEVELOPMENT X BAKER X Alm CHARLIE X THESE .ARE ALMOST EBTIRELY AIR REQUIREMENTS X 

CITROL IS THE CORTROL BY SECURE MEARS OF ELECmOBICALLl' GUIDED AIRCRAFT X THE 

DISCUSSIONS OP CITROL ARD OF TBE BEMA.INIRG ITEMS ARE EXPJOOTED TO BE LARGELY . 

EXPLORATORY WITH A VllW '!QIARD AftEMPTDG TO DE'J.'ERMIRE WBE'J.'BER Ill FACT A COMBmED 

REQUIREM1i5T EXISTS AID WHAT SD:TJHITY REQtJIRFMDTS SHOULD BE Dn'OSED X WE ARE BOW 

IB PROCESS OF GATHERING I«>RE IllJ.i'ORMA.TIOR OB 'l'BESE ITEMS Alm WILL PASS IT TO YOU 

SOOK AS BECEIVED 

DIST: ••••• OOA ••••• 11 ••••• 04 ••••• COT ••••• 123 

PARAPHRASE NOT REQl.JIRED. 

QONSt.;L T CRYi>TGCE:·.;TER BEFORE DECLASSIFY I NG 

-.;tiiHEl 

Mll.. FRAMC C. AUSTIN 

.AFSA-41 601£9 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 04-10-2014 pursuantto E .0. 1352a
EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of HEI, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended November 27, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Mack V. Traynor, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley AcT of2002, that to the best of my knowledge:
     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Mack V. Traynor, III  Mack V. Traynor, III Chief Executive Officer and President
Date: February 3, 2005
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to HEI, Inc.and will be retained by HEI, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.
25
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1771 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt Indian tribal governments and other tribal entities from the employer health coverage mandate. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. THUNE, and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

Indian tribal governments and other tribal entities from 

the employer health coverage mandate. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tribal Employment 

5 and Jobs Protection Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1771 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION OF INDIAN TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS 

2 FROM EMPLOYER MANDATE. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 

4 4980H(c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amend5 ed by adding at the end the following new subparagraph: 

6 ‘‘(F) CERTAIN INDIAN EMPLOYERS.—The 

7 term ‘applicable large employer’ does not in8 clude— 

9 ‘‘(i) any Indian tribal government (as 

10 defined in section 7701(a)(40)), a subdivi11 sion of an Indian tribal government (deter12 mined in accordance with section 7871(d)), 

13 or an agency or instrumentality of an In14 dian tribal government or subdivision 

15 thereof, 

16 ‘‘(ii) any tribal organization (as de17 fined in section 4(l) of the Indian Self-De18 termination and Education Assistance 

19 Act), 

20 ‘‘(iii) any corporation if more than 50 

21 percent (determined by vote and value) of 

22 the outstanding stock of such corporation 

23 is owned, directly or indirectly, by any en24 tity described in subclause (i) or (ii), or 

25 ‘‘(iv) any partnership if more than 50 

26 percent of the value of the capital and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1771 IS

1 profits interests of such partnership are 

2 owned, directly or indirectly, by any entity 

3 described in subclause (i) or (ii).’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to calendar years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

99-1345.

#### State v. Kanetsky.

Trumbull App. No. 97-T-0162. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the application for dismissal be, and hereby is, granted.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause be, and hereby is, dismissed.
COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

      Independent directors are compensated at an annual rate of $20,000 plus
$1,000 for each Board meeting and $750 for each committee meeting (and $1,000
for audit committee meetings) attended in person or by telephone. Compensation
for participating in meetings is limited to $1,000 per day. Members of the
special committee formed in March 2005 to evaluate a potential business
combination were each paid $10,000 for service on such committee and are not
entitled to additional fees for participating in committee meetings. Newly
appointed or elected directors are granted ten-year non-qualified stock options
to acquire 40,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price equal to the
fair market value on the grant date. The Chairman of the Audit Committee and the
Compensation Committee receive a retainer at the annual rate of $10,000 and
$2,000, respectively. Forty percent of the foregoing compensation is paid to the
directors in the form of restricted stock units which are granted on a quarterly
basis at the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date.