alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amend#2 to Unfunded Supplemental Retirement Plan for Senior Managers



 Exhibit 10.5 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 
 INTERNATIONAL PAPER COMPANY 
 UNFUNDED SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT PLAN 
 FOR SENIOR MANAGERS 
 The International Paper Company Unfunded Supplemental
Retirement Plan for Senior Managers, as amended and restated January 1, 2008 (the “SERP”), is hereby amended effective the 14th day
of October 2008, as follows: 
 1. By deleting Section 4 in its entirety and inserting the following language in lieu thereof: 
 “4. Vesting. 
 An Eligible
Employee who has attained his or her Vesting Date while employed by the Company shall be vested in his or her retirement benefits under the Plan. 
 For purposes of the Plan, “Vesting Date” shall mean: 
 (A) his or her attainment of age 55; and 
 (B) completion of five years of Vesting Service.” 
 2.
By inserting the following language as a new paragraph immediately following the end of Section 5(A)(iii): 
 “An Eligible
Employee’s Supplemental Benefit shall be reduced by 4% for each year that commencement of payment precedes age 62. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Supplemental Benefit for any Participant who retires or whose service terminates and who has
completed at least 20 years of vesting service and who has attained age 61 at termination shall not be so reduced.” 
 3. By inserting the following new
sentence at the end of the second paragraph of Section 5(B): 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Supplemental Benefit for any
Participant who retires or whose service terminates and who has completed at least 20 years of vesting service and who has attained age 61 at termination shall not be so reduced.” 
 4. By inserting the following new sentence at the end of the fourth paragraph of Section 5(C): 
 “Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Supplemental Benefit for any Participant who retires or whose service terminates and who has completed at least 20 years of vesting service and who has attained age 61 at termination shall not be so
reduced.” 







 5. By deleting Section 5(D) in its entirety and inserting the following language in lieu thereof: 
 “D. Time of Payment of the Supplemental Benefit. 
 As specified in Section 6 below, for an Eligible Employee who terminates employment following his or her Vesting Date, payment of the Supplemental Benefit shall be made following his or her Retirement Date
(unless terminated prior to such Retirement Date as a result of a Change in Control) in accordance with, and at the time specified, under the applicable provision of Section 6. 
 For purposes of the Plan, “Retirement Date” shall mean the first of the month following the Eligible Employee’s termination of
employment with the Company and the earlier to occur of: 
 (i) his or her attainment of age 55 and completion of 10 years of Vesting
Service; or 
 (ii) his or her attainment of age 65 and completion of five years of Vesting Service.” 
 6. By deleting Section 5(F) in its entirety.
# CE2004088EN.01070501.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/705 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/705

---

(2004/C 88 E/0727)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0682/04

by Proinsias De Rossa (PSE) to the Commission

(9 March 2004)

Subject:   Bushmeat: Development Strategies

Subject:

Following the European Commission's support for the African Forest Law Enforcement and Governance Ministerial Declaration, what discussions has the Commission held with the governments of Cameroon and Ghana, concerning the implementation of the indicative actions relating to bushmeat? And what support does the Commission plan to provide to help these countries implement the indicative actions relating to bushmeat and integrate them into their development strategies?

Answer given by Mr Nielson on behalf of the Commission

(27 April 2004)

(27 April 2004)

Indicative actions relating to bushmeat form part of the declaration adopted at the launch of the Africa Ministerial Process for Forest Law Enforcement and Governance (AFLEG) in Yaoundé in 2003. The main objective of this declaration is to build commitment to strengthen forest sector governance and combat illegal logging. As yet, the Commission has not held discussions with the governments of Ghana and Cameroon regarding the specific implementation of indicative actions relating to bushmeat set out in the declaration. No specific provision of support outside existing co-operation is foreseen to help countries implement indicative actions relating to bushmeat and integrate these into their development strategies.

However, the Commission is working to ensure strong follow-up to the AFLEG ministerial process, including through the provision of financial support and in dialogue with partner countries. Dialogue with partner countries has focused on the attainment of the overall objective of the declaration, which is to strengthen forest sector governance in Africa. Strengthened forest sector governance will in turn support improvements in many aspects of forest management in Africa, including matters relating to bushmeat.

Follow-up to the AFLEG ministerial conference must reflect commitment from African governments, African civil society and the private sector. Follow-up activities will be subject to a loose form of central co-ordination, but the emphasis is firmly on governments and organisations contributing in the best ways they see fit. The Commission is providing technical, political and financial support for these activities.

In Cameroon an ‘Environment and Forests Cell’ is funded from the European Development Fund. This provides support to assist the government to address challenges which arise in relation to forests and the environment, including bushmeat.

In numerous other African countries, the Commission provides support to governments, civil society and local people to facilitate the sustainable management of protected areas, forest concessions and the wildlife resources found therein. This support will continue to be made available.

---
t- - " - -

:5:' ..... 

~ -- ;:......- ...... -

--is; 

.. 

r 

f. 

"--- - ~ - e::-_ 

iillll"' -

.. ;._ 

Mr •. Robert w._ Straus 

Straus & PerTl" 1~42 20t.h street, HW 

Washington ~, D. c. 

Dear Bobs 

,. 

REF ID:A68076 

:ir.,-- __ .. _ 

< - .. 

I ~-- •- .,· 

. ' , . 

I am indebted to you tor sending me tba literature,, 

which I llill reviev am then pass on to o~ers in our hierarchy. Attar that I will talk vi. th them am see where we 

M'.any thanks. 

.. , 

"' 

WIIJ..IAM F. FRIEDMAll 

Consultant 

@'pproved for Release by NSA on 06-13-2014 pursuant to E.O~ 13s2e 

• j 

ii 

-

I 

, 

I 

.- .. I ., I 

' • 4 

~:1 

-- ------------·--------=-·
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

 v.

ADRIANA NAVARRETE,

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 16-50194

D.C. No. 

3:15-cr-00596-BEN-5

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 10, 2017

Pasadena, California

Before: REINHARDT, KOZINSKI, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

“We review the district court’s interpretation of the [U.S. Sentencing]

Guidelines de novo, the district court’s application of the Guidelines to the facts of

the case for abuse of discretion, and the district court’s factual findings for clear

FILED

SEP 14 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
error.” United States v. Treadwell, 593 F.3d 990, 999 (9th Cir. 2010). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

1. The record establishes that the district court considered the enumerated

factors in the commentary to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2 when assessing whether Navarrete

should receive a sentence reduction for playing a minor role in the offense. See

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2, cmt. n.3(C) (2015). Defense counsel listed all five factors in the

guidelines commentary, and the district court stated that it had “considered the

application notes of 3B1.2.” “We assume that district judges know the law and

understand their obligation to consider all of the [sentencing] factors.” United

States v. Carty, 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008). “The district court need not tick

off each of the [sentencing] factors to show that it has considered them.” Id. The

district court did not improperly rely solely upon Navarrete’s “essential role” in the

conspiracy, and did not abuse its discretion in denying a minor role sentence

reduction.

2. There is no doubt that Navarrete knew the laundered funds were the

proceeds of cocaine sales or were intended to promote the distribution of cocaine. 

The district court therefore properly applied a six-level enhancement under

U.S.S.G. § 2S1.1(b)(1).

2
3. Navarrete entered into a plea agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B). The district court was not bound by its terms,

compare Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(B), with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1)(C), and at her

change-of-plea hearing, Navarrete confirmed that she understood the nature of her

agreement. When the district court rejected the plea agreement, it provided a

robust explanation of the nature of the offense and Navarrete’s role. There was

thus no error in the district court’s rejection of Navarrete’s plea agreement.

4. All arguments raised for the first time in Navarrete’s reply brief are

waived. See United States v. Romm, 455 F.3d 990, 997 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

3
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 41 (Tuesday, March 3, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 11518]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-04309]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #14233 and #14234]


California Disaster #CA-00231

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of California dated 02/23/2015.
    Incident: Mission District Fire.
    Incident Period: 01/27/2015.

DATES: Effective Date: 02/23/2015.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 04/24/2015.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 11/23/2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing And Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A. Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Assistance, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW., 
Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: San Francisco.
Contiguous Counties: California: Alameda; Marin; San Mateo.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      3.625
  Homeowners Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      1.813
  Businesses With Credit Available Elsewhere.................      6.000
  Businesses Without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations With Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.625
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
For Economic Injury:
  Businesses & Small Agricultural Cooperatives Without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations Without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.625
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 14233 5 
and for economic injury is 14234 0.
    The States which received an EIDL Declaration # are California.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 59002 and 59008)

    Dated: February 23, 2015.
Maria Contreras-Sweet,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2015-04309 Filed 3-2-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FREDY AND MARIA BOTELLO,

Appellants,

v.

FELIX AND ROSIE SALINAS,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00201

- CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 2

of Travis County, Texas

(TC # C

- 1

- CV

- 14

- 003359)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of prosecution, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We further order that because Appellant is indigent, no order regarding costs

is made. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERE D THIS 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER , 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Barajas, C.J., (Senior Judge)

(Barajas, C.J., Senior Judge, sitting by assignment, not participating)
REF ID:A43485 

-.-

I '-.f · --~ ... ~ .... 

--.i1 

MIMOIAJIDVM fOI. t1IE RClrl.f\RY or J)U£Ml2 

(mN: Mr. Clyde W. llllott, tlepldJ Direct«, 

Offloe of Specl&l OpereUona) 

IUIJEClt Request for~ l\utborsty 

1. a.cent denlopaumta in the area wldoll Use IJAIIDll 

Pl'OQfUl wu m.19ned to exploit have reaultecl Jn a doubliDv of 

pctentJal cf~ plPi text. Tllo Ctllnmt ~ .baYe tJ!ae 

capadty to uploU only • porUoa or the ~ favOl'abie situauons. Other J!l'Ulftlsln9 but sltraaUon ma now bemo backlogged 

to -U edditlouJ maekllla. 

2. .--lddltloaa1 tHtUJpment i. m-oe-ad:r needed at tho wUest 

posalt.le dale m «Ur to produ~ mere decrypted p.la.tn text sooner. 

During ct>Utnlc:Uoo, sovena1 advences will be .Incorporated into 

part ot the lot1c w double tbo capa~ty cf one ot I.ha <levtoes. It 

18 also J>l&nMd ~ incol'porete thla :aodl:UcaUon. into the already 

e.KHU."2.g devle-e aitv tho deUvesy ~{ the prof~cced new one. r.wa, 

lt I.a expected that moat of the ~tnv a.ltuatkms will be o:plonable more Narly on a eotrent baets. 

J. The ~oet of thLt _... device and of the .nccSUJcaU::m to 

the r;.-eaent oae will t.e about $2.1so.aoo ot which &boQt $Z.uoo. iJOC 

wW be O&M money. me re.wlr.der AD'f&E. Tbe latter fu;:ids caa 1'.G 

aada av&tl.able within NIA ltDT&E luDds. 

"· AUtbodly 1s benby ra~eatecl 1....U.tely to re~am 

$ 2. OQO, 000 from the rr-GJ $11. GOO• GOO funde wftleh wete added 

oa to tbe rr-u baa• budget tor ,urpoaes of copl1tf wtth Uw 9fOW!Av .,..,... proble• diaou•ed at &bat Ume. fhla nt~ can 

be accompliabed wUh 91.lnJmua dlarQUOD watch Will DO& •PJl'KiAbJJ' 

dekf tla• wart orl9inall7' coatemplat9d wlaea tlle $1i. 800. 040 wae 

mflU8•ted· 

THfS DOCUMENT IS SUIJECJ TO SEMIANNUAL INVENJORY. 

- - - ~ 

QA TS Co1t11ta61 03608 

~:: .~"t;:.,~&;LQ. ... ,A.~NUAL INVEN"l"O;,'t. 

eclassified and approved for release by NSA on 10-08-2013 pursuant to E.O. 

3526 
.. 

REF ID:A43485 

JOPMCOXppwt 

5. Simvl&eMOdly witla the procwwaltllt actlon tor the 

addWoaal devlca, baeucb aDd Dewlop..al peraoaael taalllar 

wllh the 1Wol:Je• bave ea'91'ed into an a..t .. IN tbree-month 

study wlUch will ,..•It la •peoifloatlw I• MdlUoaal setUDt 

•vtcea. Tha1e units we .... ...,. to JIQCluce clecrypted *-l 

bf exteulon of the renltll clev•loped bf the ..,1p.e11t MD.tloHCl 

uav• and oUaer IL\IWNt Ml'l1P .. nta. J)epeftd!a; upon tb• aature 

of t&e Rea..-oa. end ~enlopaent propoaela. I •Y baYe ta recauat 

add!Uonal faanda to procve dwa-t uni ta. The •---• wUl l:Mt a 

mauar of turtb.er carrespondenc9. 

6. :1dcl1Uonal details can t,,e made avallaNe lma.clla'8ly 

by Dr. Tordella or myaeU Jn caae they are naecled. 

ccs D/DIR 

ADRD 

DADP 

DIR « "' 

In(, 

's' L. H. FROST .. 

L. H. raon 

Vice Ada!rU, USN 

Dll'eotal' 

N/R: 'lext by D/DIR, ADR, and DADP. Procurement •ctlon lnvolved 

bu bHn coordlnat8d wltb pntiea caacerned 1n ualyaill and exploitaUon. 

L. W. Tardella, D/DIR, 322V ... 

2 

',: . . . 61 036Q8 ·,.......... .. ... " ,,...... •• ~-lo 

, ~ f""!" ... 

f,,~ .. _ ... .a.--"·.~ . _,. ·::c 

.. . ~· ... .,. .
CLASSIFIED 

MESSAGE 

INCOMING • DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY 

STAFF COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE 

S'E0REE!' PARAPHRASE NOT REQUIRED 

STATE DEPT MSG: 

Prom: 

To: 

Nr: 

Secretary of State sgd Acheson 

AMCONSUL Shanghai China 

648 13 Apr 49 

Dept generally approves plan (CONTEL 1077). Establish 

CW base Taipei utilizing present equipment available (PC-339's). Report when base ready commence operations and Dept. will make 

arrangements tor CW contact with Navy to Guam or Sangley Point. 

Navy advisee you must supply frequencies. In event none available suggest use free channel determined by local monitoring. Installation should be made with view possible ~onversion 

radio teletype. Any cost involved in transfer equipment should 

be charged evacuation allotment #9E135380. 

Repeated to: Nank1ng, Canton. Taipei. 

Declassified and approved for release by NSA on 07-30-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352a 

ROTE: TEL 1077 is CM IN 14764 (6 Apr 49) SIG (FAC) 

DA SCD FORM 22-2 15 JAN 1949 

ACTION: SIG 

IKFO • • AF. ID, LOGD. PO CSGAS-80 CSG.~S-20 

CM IN 16732 (15 Apl' 49) DTO: 13 Apl'/2pm dwn/C 

1

-t 62 APR 161'949-

- 52 -= - -

~­

... -. 

. , 

' • ' 

I . 

I -
KENNETH E. HIGGINS and DEETE HIGGINS, on behalf of

t hemselves and all others similarly situated

,
Appellant s ,

v.

COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY

,
Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 1 4

- 22 84

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 1 4 , 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Nassau County. Robert M. Foster , Judge

.

John S. Mills and C ourtney Brewer of the Mills Firm, P.A., Tallahassee ; Robert J. Axelrod of Axelrod & Dean LLP, New York, New York ; P. Scott Russell, IV of P. Scott Russell, P.A., Jacksonville ; Jeffery M. Liggio and Geoff S. Stahl of Liggio Benrubi, West Palm Beach

, for App ellant s

.

Peter D. Webster of Carlton, Fields, Jorden, Burt, P.A., Tallahassee ; Marty J. Solomon and Joseph H. Lang, Jr. of Carlton, Fields, Jorden, Burt, P.A., Tampa , for Appellee

.

Alexandra J. Overhoff, Tallahassee, for Amicus Curiae Florida Land Title Association

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See generally Bleich v. Chicago Title Ins. Co. , 117 So. 3d

1163, 1165 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013), review denied , 134 So. 3d 445 (Fla. 2014).2 ROBERTS, C.J., BENTON, and LEWIS, JJ., CONCUR.
......... - .,-- --..... --- '· .!, ARL~£: .. iiti.~.€J}_~ 5 J..i'IU' .I.Vil fi..., i;;1 .1.J\.1...LVll 

~ .. Date tf~"li . .. ql'lll.!;it:J--

_,. 

TO/ FRO~·I 

V Commancb..ng Officer ----..,. s st. t:onmandant/ --------~4---- --D1r. of Com. Hes_e_a-r"""ch,.---\7--.,,,. ___ _ 

-Executive Officer 

hSSt. Executive O""f""f"'"i-c-er------

--AdJutant --Asst. ,ld_J_u..,..t_an_t_________ _ 

--Chief 1 Headquarters Branch 

--Coordination Section ~-~-

--Inf. and Liaison Sec ti on 

--Cluef, J~ Branch ------

-Chief, B !3ranch 

-Chief, C Branch----------

--Chief, D Branch 

Chief, E !3ranch -------------- -Chief, F Branch----------

--Dir. of Tra:i.m.ng _ 2 d Sir,. ~erv. Bn. ·------------ _______ _ 

Property ufficer ---Personnel Office_r ___________ _ 

-Provost l!arshal 

:2 o st Engineer ------------- -CJ..assified I1ai......,,..l.....,..R-o-om_1 _______ _ 

-Secretar,i' to .c. o. --Gen~ral Files --------

201 1',iles 

/comments and Return 

--ilecol"llilendat.Lons ---------

---In!ormation 

--Inf 0r1 a tion_a_n...,.d-I"'"le-t"""u_r_n ______ _ 

--I:'lf. and rorward:mg 

--Your Information an....,d"""F""1"""1=-e------

___ S~gnat".ll"e, if approved 

See Note on Back ------

-At- Re 11uested 

---nS Discussed-------------------

--Your _lction 

-----------------~ 
- ~ -- r-
APJ..INGTrnJ HAI.i. STATION 

TO 

Cor:ir.mnd:tnt; Of f:..ce:"' 

---A::; st. CO'l'IIiP •• 1dc.11'b- ------.----

~1r. of Co:.1. Hesearch 

-----E:tecutiYc Officer ~-------

.'.s::it. E:-:ecutive Officpr ~AcJutant . ---------

A~1at. Adjut.:mt ----Caoruination Se·_c_t_i-on-------------

Chief; Headquarters Branch --- _:__Chief, A }3ranch ________ -----_ 

Chief, B Brcmch 

----Chief, C Branch --------------- -----Cl Lief, D Branch ------------- ----Chief, E Branch--------------

-Chief, F 1rnncn 

Dir. of Training -------~-----

---c. o. of Troops -------------- ----Property Of f~ce_r _____________ ~-

Pers onnel .. Of fie er 

----·Provost :i~ir;::.1al ----------------

CJ.as sified i~il 2oom 

---secretaZ:: to c. o. --------- -General l'ilcs 

.201 P_i_lcs ------------- ---

C0!'\!11e .:t:3 a ~d :;:le:tur:'l. ----: e c ome-1dc t 1.ons ------------ --~~I~formatioa ------------------- I.1for;:mt1011 a 1d Rcrl.urn -----Inf. ai11..-I_ F:>:•\ •. .rd.J._1t; -------- ----Your I.U'or:.r.:ition anc..~=-.~li'i~l-e~.~------

____ Si~~~ture, if ~~proved ___________ _ 

See i.lote o~ 3a.ck~ 

-----A a Requested ---------------- ----As Discussed-------------------~-

Your Action 

---- -----------------------
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2010-NM-040-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory 3, tion"?

YES () cxpla;n NO (X)

DOT Regulatory llolicies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES () expla;n NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a slLbstantial number of small entities?

YES () expla;n NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where avi~tion might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)