alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements of CPAC, Inc. for the period ending December 31, 1998 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000351717
<NAME> CPAC, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,735,391
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,141,647
<ALLOWANCES>                                   846,000
<INVENTORY>                                 21,348,630
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            43,410,783
<PP&E>                                      32,423,139
<DEPRECIATION>                              12,698,133
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,185,792
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,255,929
<BONDS>                                      7,567,581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        67,678
<OTHER-SE>                                  55,383,965
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,185,792
<SALES>                                     84,315,325
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            84,315,325
<CGS>                                       47,295,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,295,239
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             659,690
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,401,098
<INCOME-TAX>                                 3,030,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          4,371,098
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 4,371,098
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.63
        

</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register: May 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 102)]
[Notices]               
[Page 29769]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr27my10-67]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

 
Notice of Meetings

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act as amended (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ) announces meetings of scientific peer 
review groups. The subcommittees listed below are part of the Agency's 
Health Services Research Initial Review Group Committee.
    The subcommittee meetings will be closed to the public in 
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 
U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6). Grant applications are to 
be reviewed and discussed at these meetings. These discussions are 
likely to involve information concerning individuals associated with 
the applications, including assessments of their personal 
qualifications to conduct their proposed projects. This information is 
exempt from mandatory disclosure under the above-cited statutes.

    1. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Technology and Decision 
Sciences.
    Date: June 15-17, 2010 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on June 15 
and closed for remainder of the meeting)
    Place: Crowne Plaza Hotel, 3 Research Court, Conference Room 
TBD, Rockville, MD 20852.
    2. Name of Subcommittee: Health Systems Research.
    Date: June 16-18, 2010 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on June 16 
and closed for remainder of the meeting)
    Place: Sheraton Rockville Hotel, 920 King Farm Boulevard, 
Conference Room TBD, Rockville, MD 20852.
    3. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Research Training.
    Date: June 17-18, 2010 (Open from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. on June 17 
and closed for remainder of the meeting)
    Place: Hyatt Regency Hotel, 7400 Wisconsin Avenue, 1 Bethesda 
Metro Center, Conference Room TBD, Bethesda, Maryland 20814.
    4. Name of Subcommittee: Health Care Quality and Effectiveness 
Research.
    Date: June 22-24, 2010 (Open from 8:30 a.m. to 8:45 a.m. on June 
22 and closed for remainder of the meeting)
    Place: Hilton Rockville Executive Meeting Center, 1750 Rockville 
Pike, Conference Room TBD, Rockville, Maryland 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the nonconfidential portions of the meetings 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Suite 2000, Rockville, Maryland 20850, 
Telephone (301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for these meetings are subject to change as 
priorities dictate.

    Dated: May 13, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-12547 Filed 5-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
#### Robert P. McDANIEL, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross Appellant, v. The FULTON NATIONAL BANK OF ATLANTA, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Appellee. Jan T. BARKSDALE, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORP. OF ALPHARETTA, Defendant-Appellant. James R. BARRETT et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. VERNIE JONES FORD, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 75-2410, 75-2514 and 75-2515.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 23, 1978.

Marion H. Allen, III, Richard R. Cheat-ham, Atlanta, Ga., for Fulton Nat. Bank of Atlanta.

E. Lundy Baety, Atlanta, Ga., for Robert P. McDaniel.

Albert C. Ruehmann, III, Richard R. Cheatham, Atlanta, Ga., for Peoples Financial Corp. of Alpharetta and Vernie Jones Ford, Inc.

Graydon W. Florence, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for Jan T. Barksdale.

Mary Joyce Johnson, N. David Buffing-ton, Atlanta, Ga., for James R. Barrett.

Sewell K. Loggins, Douglas N. Campbell, Atlanta, Ga., for amicus curiae Beneficial Finance Co.

Ernest L. Sarason, Jr., Willard Ogburn, Boston, Mass., for amicus curiae Nat. Consumer Law Center, Inc.

Before TUTTLE, GOLDBERG and RO-NEY, Circuit Judges.

TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:

These three truth-in-lending eases commenced in three suits filed in the Northern District of Georgia, which having been considered by magistrates were then decided by three different district judges. In all cases, judgment was had in favor of the plaintiffs and against the respective defendants. The sole question in issue was whether the Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1638(a)(9) and Regulation Z, § 226.8(b)(4) required a creditor to disclose as a default charge the fact that the loan agreement gave him the contract right to accelerate and demand payment of the entire indebtedness, including unearned finance charges.

When these three cases were heard on appeal, this Court had decided another case, *Martin v. Commercial Securities Co.,*539 F.2d 521 (5th Cir. 1976), in which the Court held that the right to accelerate and demand such unearned finance charges was not such a “default, delinquency, or similar charge.” Thus, this Court, considering itself bound by the *Martin*decision, reversed the judgments of the district court, stating that:

> The established policy of this Court is to recognize the binding effect of a prior decision by another panel of the Court subject only to a reversal by the Court sitting en banc.

Thereupon a petition for rehearing en banc was filed and the Court by appropriate vote reheard the case en banc. The en banc opinion has now been published, and a petition for rehearing has been denied, 571 F.2d 948, 576 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir. 1978).

The en banc court, having reversed the holding in *Martin*and the panel decision in these three captioned cases relying on that decision, remanded the cases to the panel for final disposition.

The decision of this Court, sitting en banc, requires our affirmance of the three judgments in the district court.

The judgments are AFFIRMED.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00624-CV

Olivia Briones RIOJAS,

Appellant

v.

Elvira V. CHAVEZ, Independent Administrator of the Estate of Ruben G. Briones, Deceased,

Appellee

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PC3074

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: December 5, 2018

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

In this appeal of an eviction judgment, Appellant’s brief was due on October 26, 2018. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). On November 6, 2018, after no brief or motion for extension of time to 

file the brief was filed, we ordered Appellant to show cause in writing not later than November 16, 

2018, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a). We 

warned Appellant that if she failed to show cause in writing as ordered, we could dismiss this 

appeal without further notice. 
04-18-00624-CV

- 2 -

To date, Appellant has filed no response to our November 6, 2018 order. We dismiss this 

appeal for want of prosecution. See id. R. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION FURNISHED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Riggs National
Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Robert L. Allbritton, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By:  /s/ Robert L. AllbrittonName: Robert L. Allbritton
  Chief Executive Officer
  November 18, 2003

1
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00142

- CV

CITY OF LEON VALLEY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

, Appellant

v.

Larry LITTLE

, Appellee

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 17823 Honorable Peter A. Sakai, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, we WITHDRAW our opinion and order of June 19, 2013, and SUBSTITUTE this opinion an d judgment. The trial court’s order is AFFIRMED. We tax costs of this appeal against Appellant City of Leon Valley Economic Development Corporation.

SIGNED December 31, 2013.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
EXHIBIT 23

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-04524, 33-74026 and 33-89146) and in the
Prospectus constituting part of the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File
No. 333-21557) of Data Broadcasting Corporation of our report dated August 18,
1999, except as to the subsequent event described in Note 17 which is as of
August 31, 1999, relating to the financial statements which appear in this
Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
on the financial statement schedule, which also appears in this form 10-K.


/s/  PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP


Salt Lake City, Utah
September 27, 1999
1 The Honorable Henry E. Autrey, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-2140

___________ Michael L. Fogle, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Alan Blake, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: July 2, 2007 Filed: July 10, 2007

___________ Before RILEY, MAGILL, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Michael Fogle (Fogle), a civilly committed resident of the Missouri Sexual Offender Treatment Center (MSOTC), appeals the district court’s 1 pre-service dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. F ogle’s complaint alleged his constitutional rights had been violated because the MSOT C denied Fogle the use of a typewriter or computer as medically recommended relief from handwriting. The district court dismissed the complaint pre-service pursu ant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), for being legally frivolous or for failing to state a claim.-2- Upon de novo review, see Moore v. Sims , 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we conclude that dismi ssal was proper, notwithstanding the liberal standard applied to pro se complaints, seeStone v. Harry , 364 F.3d 912, 914 (8th Cir. 2004) (explaining pro se complaints are to be construed liberally but must allege sufficient facts to support claims). Accordi ngly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Century Properties Fund XVI(the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of thePartnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

 

This certification is furnished with thisReport pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall notbe deemed filed by the Partnership for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended.
QCOM 6.26.11 EX32.2






EXHIBIT 32.2 
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 
     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of QUALCOMM Incorporated (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 26, 2011 (the Report), I, William E. Keitel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 
		
	(1)
	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 


		
	(2)
	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 




Dated: July 20, 2011 


	
		
	/s/ William E. Keitel  
	 

	William E. Keitel, 
	 

	Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
V/DIR 1 

C/S 2 

DC/S 3 

P/P 4=7 062 14 

Nl S=ll 

S/ASST (Mro Frietilman) 12 

C/SF£ l3 

---

12 APR 54 

DTG: 122~~8z APR 54 

wt 2f6 PD PLS PASS FOLL TO MR FRANK AUSTIN PD USCIB HAS DISAPPiiOVED BRITISH 

REQUEST TO DISCLOSE FURTBIR DETAILS OF CIRCUIT MERCURY TO FRm!CH , 

M/R: Dscision of USCIB in 9 April meeting passed to Mro Austin tor his 

informa.tiono 

60548 TOP 

TOP SECRET CONTROL NR 54~0~~7253 

PAGE 1 Of' 1 PAGE 

COPY /~Of' 14 COP~ES 

~~~~l , CHIBF PJ? Jeclassified and approved for S E C it "'It T elease by NSA on 05-12-2014 

oursuantto E.O. 13526 I
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM XEROX 
CREDIT CORPORATION'S SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED 
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,757
<ALLOWANCES>                                       122
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,677
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,835
<BONDS>                                          4,026
<COMMON>                                            23
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         545
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,677
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   287
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     8
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 178
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    101
<INCOME-TAX>                                        41
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 60
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        60
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


        

</TABLE>
# CE2004078EN.01090701.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/907 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/907

---

(2004/C 78 E/0959)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-4062/03

by Alexandros Alavanos (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(13 January 2004)

Subject:   Health and safety of workers — complaint 00/4404, SG(2000) A/3828/2

Subject:

After examining complaint 00/4404, SG(2000) A/3828/2 and sending its representative to hold meetings in Greece, the Commission reportedly decided to initiate an infringement procedure against the Hellenic Republic and send it a letter of formal notice, to which the Greek Government has replied.

In view of the increasing number of complaints and the commonly held belief in Greece that the departments responsible for implementing Directive 89/391/EEC (1) on the health and safety of workers are not performing their task satisfactorily and employers continue to breach the rules on health and safety at work, what are the main points of the Commission's letter of formal notice and what was the Greek authorities' answer?

1

Answer given by Mrs Diamantopoulou on behalf of the Commission

(20 February 2004)

(20 February 2004)

As stated by the Honourable Member, with regard to complaint 2000/4404, the Commission has sent a letter of formal notice to the Greek Government, to which the Greek authorities have replied.

The letter of formal notice concerns the application under Greek law of Council Directive 89/391/EEC of 12 June 1989 on the implementation of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health of workers at work (2), and the individual Directives adopted under it. In particular, it reiterates the Member States' obligation to ensure appropriate monitoring and surveillance of provisions adopted to transpose Community directives. Failure to enforce such provisions, or failure to enforce them properly, constitutes an infringement of Community law and may give rise to infringement proceedings before the Court of Justice.

2

The Commission would like to inform the Honourable Member that it has officially asked the Greek Government for its comments on this subject, especially details of the checks carried out and the occupational accident rate.

The Greek authorities have provided detailed and reasoned replies to the letter of formal notice. In view of the complexity of the matter, the Commission is currently examining the Greek authorities' response and will take the necessary action in the light of the results of this examination and taking account of any information received subsequently.

---

(1)  OJ L 183, 29.6.1989, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ L 183, 29.6.1989.

2

---
• 

REF ID:A65450 

14 Ma;y 1954 

Mi•• Fn.ncee Wala• 

e/o Dr. O.a. Suit#, Vice P:rea1d.ent 

Gcneml Eleotric Coapu:iy 

P.O. b 1088 

fJ(!:bemctady, 1few York 

Dev Mi•• Walet s 

~.nie i• to a.clmovled{{fl the p:to11pt attention given 

to the req.ue•t contaizwd in~ i.tter ot 5 Mt.y 19!)4. 

l u torry to have trQubltd )'OU vith the atter, and. 

lft&t'.1.¥ app~cte.te the •lac:rity o:t y~ ft:P1Y. 

Sincere.11', 

I. T. McOOliAlD 

AA•iatant to William 'I. hiedma.n 

lacutiv• S.cretary-

?IJA Scientit'ic M.Yisory Board 

@'pproved for Release bv NSA on 07-23-2014 pursuantto E.O. 1352\3 

- - 1- --- - -
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 21

                        SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
                        ------------------------------
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                    Jurisdiction of
      Company                                                       Incorporation
      -------                                                       ---------------
<S>                                                                 <C>
1.    Banyan Systems International Incorporated                      Massachusetts

2.    Banyan Securities Corporation                                  Massachusetts

3.    Banyan Systems Asia-Pacific Incorporated                       Massachusetts

4.    Banyan Systems (UK) Ltd.                                       England

5.    Banyan Systems (Holland) B.V.                                  Holland

6.    Banyan Systems (Deutschland)                                   Germany

7.    Banyan Systems (France) S.A.R.L.                               France

8.    Beyond Incorporated                                            Delaware

9.    Banyan Systems S.A. de C.V                                     Mexico

10.   Banyan Systems Asia Pacific Ltd.                               Hong Kong

11.   Banyan Systems (Taiwan), Incorporated                          Massachusetts

12.   Nihon Banyan Systems K.K.                                      Japan

13.   Banyan Systems (Korea) Co., Ltd.                               Korea

14.   Banyan Systems do Brasil Ltda.                                 Brazil

15.   Banyan Enterprise Networks                                     South Africa

16.   Coordinate.com Incorporated                                    Delaware

17.   Switchboard Incorporated                                       Delaware
</TABLE>