alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 44 (Friday, March 6, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05220]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The applications will also be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than April 2, 2015.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (Yvonne Sparks, Community 
Development Officer), P.O. Box 442, St. Louis, Missouri 63166-2034:
    1. BancorpSouth, Inc., Tupelo, Mississippi; to merge with Central 
Community Corporation, Temple, Texas, and thereby indirectly acquire 
First State Bank Central Texas, Austin, Texas.
    2. BancorpSouth, Inc., Tupelo, Mississippi; to acquire, through 
merger, Ouachita Bancshares Corporation, and thereby indirectly acquire 
Ouachita Independent Bank, both in Monroe, Louisiana.
    B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant 
Vice President), 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:
    1. Ironhorse Financial Group, Inc., Muskogee, Oklahoma; to acquire 
100 percent of the voting shares of Benefit Bank, Fort Smith, Arkansas.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, March 3, 2015.
Michael J. Lewandowski,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2015-05220 Filed 3-5-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 20

- 30695 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus
**Jeremy Rubin,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:18

- CR

- 359

- 1

Before **Smith, Stewart,** and **Graves,** Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  * We previously remanded this case to the district court for it to
consider and state on the record “ whether it would have imposed the same sentence if it had known that the BOP could not, and therefore would not, give Rubin credit for time served since Janu ary 14th, 2019 .” United States v.

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 3, 2021 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-30695 Document: 00516116252 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/03/2021No. 20

- 30695

2 Rubin , 854 F. App’x 625, 626

- 27 (5th Cir. 2021). We retained jurisdiction over the appeal pending the district court’s answer to the inquiries on limited
remand. Id. at 627. On limited remand, the district court indicat ed that it “would not have imposed the same sentence if it had known that the BOP could not, and therefore would not, give Rubin credit for time served since January 14th, 2019.” The district court further clarified that it would have pronounced its

sente nce as follows: “39 months imprisonment, which represents a within

guidelines sentence of 57 months, adjusted by the 18 months [d]efendant already served

. . . on a related sentence.” According to the district court,
the 18

- month adjustment would constitu te “either: (1) a sentence reduction pursuant to [ U.S.S.G. § 5G1.3(b)], or (2) a downward departure pursuant to [ U.S.S.G. § 5K2.23], because the 18

- month period of imprisonment by state authorities will not be credited by the [BOP].” We conclude that the district court fulfilled its duty by clarifying on the record the information we required. Accordingly, we hold that the district court erred in failing to calculate Rubin’s sentence itself and in attempting to order the BOP to award credit for time serve d since January 14, 2019. See United States v. Taylor , 973 F.3d 414, 418

- 19 (5th Cir. 2020).
Therefore, we **VACATE** and **REMAND** to the district court to
determine Rubin’s new sentence. Case: 20-30695 Document: 00516116252 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/03/2021
: A. .. ..; 

·-

REF. ID:Jl6991f • 

5PSIS-3 

4 April 1944 

. ·11r. · R&lph E. Pierce . Aaarican Telephone and Telegraph Co •. 

195 Broadva7 · New York 7 • ~~.York. 

Dear Jiil". Pierce: 

Receipt ot 7our letter ot Jl&rch 31 ia acknoVledged. 

Tbank 7ou veey much tor· 7our eongre.tul&tions and kind 

vorda. ··I bad bard.17 expected the neva ~ thf.s avard 

to get ~s tar aa Bev York but apparentl7 it baa. 

It has been a long time since ve ban bad a. "get- . together• at the Bell L&bs but I am expecting to be 

up tbe:r>e aometi.e soon and ~~·.!I will get a chance 

to see.7ou. 

With cordial greetings~ I am# 

·s1D.eerel7 7ours. 

W1111aa F. Friedman 

.Director ot COJllllUD1cat1(ms Research 

pproved for Release by NSA on 04-02-2014 pursuant to.E.O. 

13526 
·-

REF ID: A699.. e 

AMERICAN TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY 

195 BROADWAY, NEW YORK 7, N.Y. 

EXCHANGE 3·9800 

t~al."'ch 31, 1944 J, J PIL.L.100 

AISISTANT CHll!P' l!NGINEE" 

Mr. w. F. Friedman, Director of Communication Research, 

Army Communication Service, 

Pentagon Building, 

Washington, D. c. 

Dear .Mr. Friedrna.zu 

I notieed the announcement of your recent decoration by General Ingles 

and I wish to congratulate you on this recognition of your work. Having had 

some knowledge of your work over the years, I know that this recent honor is 

well deserved and a small oompensatio.n for your contribution to the war effort. 

Yours very truly,
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40947

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FELIPE ANTONIO NUNEZ-MARTINEZ

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:08-CR-348-1

Before SMITH, BENAVIDES, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Felipe Antonio

Nunez-Martinez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Nunez-Martinez has

not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 16, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-40947

2

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
Memorandum 

U.S. Department of 

Transportation 

Office of the Secretary/ u j 7 

of Transportation ·· " 1: OL1 

Subject: Essential Air Service at Merced (Docket DOT -OST -1998-

3521) and Visalia (Docket DOT-OST-2004-19916), 

q~omia.,d, J() ~ .. 

From: 

v~ Dennis J. D any, .u-ft, 

Chief ~ 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division, X-53 

To: Dockets Operations, M-30 

Date: June 11, 2012 

Reply to Brian Swanson, 

Attn. of: X-53 Ext. 65392 

By Order 2012-5-11, May 10, 2012, proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Merced 

and/or Visalia, California were due on June 11, 2011. Great Lakes Aviation Ltd., the 

incumbent EAS carrier, without objection from either community, requested a two-week 

extension to submit a proposal. 

This is to advise all parties that the Department has decided to grant the requested 

extension to file EAS proposals at Merced and/or Visalia. Proposals must be received by 

no later than June 25, 2012. 
Swanson, Brian (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Dennis I Brian, 

Chuck Howell <chowell@flygreatlakes.com> 

Sunday, June 10, 2012 10:56 PM 

Devany, Dennis (OST); dvoss@flygreatlakes.com 

Swanson, Brian (OST) 

RE: Extension- RFP for MCE & VIS 

Please accept this email as our formal request for an additional (2) two weeks extension to submit the EAS proposals for 

Merced & Visalia, California. 

In light of recent gate /parking limitations at LAX we would like the additional time to sort out these issues & cost. 

Regards, 

Chuck Howell 

Great Lakes Airlines 

1
June 3, 2015 

Mr. Barry Tanner 

BarryAir, LLC 

210 Rue Chavaniac 

Lafayette, LA 70508 

Dear Mr. Tanner: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It 

explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your May 19, 2015, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-

1715), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does 

not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request 

any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 99.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the
undersigned, John R. Gibson, Chairman of the Board of Directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of American Pacific Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 of the Company (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/    JOHN R. GIBSON





John R. Gibson


Chairman of the Board of Directors, President &


Chief Executive Officer


January 29, 2003
Exhibit 32.01



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Occupational Health + Rehabilitation Inc (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John C. Garbarino, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Keith G. Frey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                          |  |  |  |                                      
|----------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|/s/    JOHN C.
GARBARINO                  |  |  |  | /s/    KEITH G.
FREY                 
|John C. Garbarino Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Keith G. Frey Chief Financial Officer
|                                          |  | 
|March 30, 2004                            |  |  |  | March 30, 2004
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<CIK> 0000351541
<NAME> BCT INTERNATIONAL, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1998
<CASH>                                             871
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,511
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,251
<INVENTORY>                                      2,375
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,611
<PP&E>                                           1,680
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  14,169
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,795
<BONDS>                                            515
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               60
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           226
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    14,169
<SALES>                                          3,863
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,405
<CGS>                                            2,883
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,430
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    47
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    51
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   9
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    868
<INCOME-TAX>                                       199
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                669
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       669
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 45 (Monday, March 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 12549]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05341]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone Line 
Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Line Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel 
is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, April 15, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Rivera at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(202) 317-3337.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Line Project Committee will be held Wednesday, April 15, 2015 at 2:30 
p.m. Eastern Time via teleconference. The public is invited to make 
oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to 
limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Linda Rivera. For more information please contact: Ms. Rivera 
at 1-888-912-1227 or (202) 317-3337, or write TAP Office, 1111 
Constitution Avenue NW., Room 1509--National Office, Washington, DC 
20224, or contact us at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The committee will be discussing Toll-free issues and public input 
is welcomed.

    Dated: March 3, 2015.
Otis Simpson,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2015-05341 Filed 3-6-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 97-11060 Summary Calendar

_____________________
CONCHITA WASHINGTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JANET RENO, Attorney General of the United States of America; KATHLEEN HAWK, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons; J. B. BOGAN, Warden, Federal Medical Center, Carswell; TERRY BARNHARD, Director and/or Supervisor Education Department, Federal Medical Center, Carswell, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CV-575-A

_________________________________________________________________ June 30, 1998 Before JOLLY, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Conchita Washington, federal inmate #14826-039, appeals the dismissal of her complaint for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate record. For essentially the same reasons as stated by2–

the district court, we conclude that the district court did not err in its dismissal for want of exhaustion. Even if Washington had
exhausted her administrative rem edies at the time she filed her complaint, her complaint fails to allege the violation of federal
law. AFFIRMED. All pending motions are DENIED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350)

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §1350), the undersigned, David N. Keys, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of American Pacific Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 of the Company (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|   | /s/  DAVID N. KEYS                                                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                     |
|   | **David N.   Keys   Executive Vice President, Chief Financial    Officer, Secretary and Treasurer** |
|   | **February   4, 2004**                                                                              |
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document









































 
 

  Exhibit 10(a)    
    


[Sutherland
Asbill and Brennan LLP Letterhead] 


October 29,
2008 


Board
of Directors

Protective Life Insurance Company

2801 Highway 201 South

Birmingham, Alabama 35223 


Directors: 


        We
hereby consent to the reference to our name under the caption "Legal Matters" in the statement of additional information filed as part of Pre-Effective Amendment
Number 1 to the Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-153041) filed by Protective Life Insurance Company and Protective Variable Annuity
Separate Account with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In giving this consent, we do not admit that we are in the category of persons whose consent is required under Section 7 of the
Securities Act of 1933. 



						
	 	 	 	Sincerely,
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	SUTHERLAND ASBILL & BRENNAN LLP
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ Stephen E. Roth






  Stephen E. Roth















QuickLinks



Exhibit 10(a)
1

Proposed Rule: Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Meeting Documentation: IBMDate Staff Contact Information Name of Organization Summary of Discussion Writt

ComProvDid tsubmDock

June 8, 2010 Scott Bartos 

(202) 343-9167 bartos.scott@ epa.gov 

• Outside participants identified below. • EPA Climate Change Division and EPA contractors: Scott Bartos, EPA; Deb Harris, ICF 

International; Shep Burton, ICF International. 

Participants presented work on the uncertainty analysis and a proposal for gas apportioning models. The presentation and the modeling proposal are available in the docket. 

IBM comthe d

Outside Participants: Michele Bolz, IBM, mmbolz@us.ibm.com Andy Brendler, IBM, brendler@us.ibm.com Jay Dietrich, IBM, jdietric@us.ibm.com Stephanie Smallwood, IBM, swsmallw@us.ibm.com Dave Speed, IBM, speed@us.ibm.com
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Senior Airman WESLEY K. FINKTON

United States Air Force

ACM S32277

6 January 2016

Sentence adjudged 17 October 2014 by SPCM convened at Fairchild Air 

Force Base, Washington. Military Judge: Vance H. Spath.

Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 months,

hard labor without confinement for 3 months, forfeitures of $1021.00 pay 

per month for 12 months and reduction to E-1.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Lieutenant Colonel Judith A. Walker; 

Major Thomas A. Smith and Captain Jonathan D. Legg

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Major Mary Ellen Payne and 

Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before

ALLRED, TELLER, and ZIMMERMAN

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is issued as an unpublished opinion and, as such, does not serve as precedent 

under Rule of Practice and Procedure 18.4.

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

LEAH M. CALAHAN

Clerk of the Court